Context stringlengths 57 92.3k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Order.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ULift
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
#align_import order.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
@[gcongr_forward] def exactSubsetOfSSubset : Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.ForwardExt where
eval h goal := do goal.assignIfDefeq (← Lean.Meta.mkAppM ``subset_of_ssubset #[h])
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
#align le_antisymm' le_antisymm
-- TODO: automatic construction of dual definitions / theorems
class SemilatticeSup (α : Type u) extends Sup α, PartialOrder α where
protected le_sup_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a ⊔ b
protected le_sup_right : ∀ a b : α, b ≤ a ⊔ b
protected sup_le : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ c → b ≤ c → a ⊔ b ≤ c
#align semilattice_sup SemilatticeSup
def SemilatticeSup.mk' {α : Type*} [Sup α] (sup_comm : ∀ a b : α, a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a)
(sup_assoc : ∀ a b c : α, a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ (b ⊔ c)) (sup_idem : ∀ a : α, a ⊔ a = a) :
SemilatticeSup α where
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le a b := a ⊔ b = b
le_refl := sup_idem
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by dsimp; rw [← hbc, ← sup_assoc, hab]
le_antisymm a b hab hba := by rwa [← hba, sup_comm]
le_sup_left a b := by dsimp; rw [← sup_assoc, sup_idem]
le_sup_right a b := by dsimp; rw [sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
sup_le a b c hac hbc := by dsimp; rwa [sup_assoc, hbc]
#align semilattice_sup.mk' SemilatticeSup.mk'
instance OrderDual.instSup (α : Type*) [Inf α] : Sup αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊓ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
instance OrderDual.instInf (α : Type*) [Sup α] : Inf αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊔ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_left : a ≤ a ⊔ b :=
SemilatticeSup.le_sup_left a b
#align le_sup_left le_sup_left
#align le_sup_left' le_sup_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-04")] alias le_sup_left' := le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_right : b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
SemilatticeSup.le_sup_right a b
#align le_sup_right le_sup_right
#align le_sup_right' le_sup_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-04")] alias le_sup_right' := le_sup_right
theorem le_sup_of_le_left (h : c ≤ a) : c ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_trans h le_sup_left
#align le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_of_le_left
theorem le_sup_of_le_right (h : c ≤ b) : c ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_trans h le_sup_right
#align le_sup_of_le_right le_sup_of_le_right
theorem lt_sup_of_lt_left (h : c < a) : c < a ⊔ b :=
h.trans_le le_sup_left
#align lt_sup_of_lt_left lt_sup_of_lt_left
theorem lt_sup_of_lt_right (h : c < b) : c < a ⊔ b :=
h.trans_le le_sup_right
#align lt_sup_of_lt_right lt_sup_of_lt_right
theorem sup_le : a ≤ c → b ≤ c → a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
SemilatticeSup.sup_le a b c
#align sup_le sup_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_le_iff : a ⊔ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h : a ⊔ b ≤ c => ⟨le_trans le_sup_left h, le_trans le_sup_right h⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => sup_le h₁ h₂⟩
#align sup_le_iff sup_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_left : a ⊔ b = a ↔ b ≤ a :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans <| by simp [le_rfl]
#align sup_eq_left sup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_right : a ⊔ b = b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_antisymm_iff.trans <| by simp [le_rfl]
#align sup_eq_right sup_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_sup : a = a ⊔ b ↔ b ≤ a :=
eq_comm.trans sup_eq_left
#align left_eq_sup left_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_sup : b = a ⊔ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans sup_eq_right
#align right_eq_sup right_eq_sup
alias ⟨_, sup_of_le_left⟩ := sup_eq_left
#align sup_of_le_left sup_of_le_left
alias ⟨le_of_sup_eq, sup_of_le_right⟩ := sup_eq_right
#align sup_of_le_right sup_of_le_right
#align le_of_sup_eq le_of_sup_eq
attribute [simp] sup_of_le_left sup_of_le_right
@[simp]
theorem left_lt_sup : a < a ⊔ b ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
le_sup_left.lt_iff_ne.trans <| not_congr left_eq_sup
#align left_lt_sup left_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem right_lt_sup : b < a ⊔ b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
le_sup_right.lt_iff_ne.trans <| not_congr right_eq_sup
#align right_lt_sup right_lt_sup
theorem left_or_right_lt_sup (h : a ≠ b) : a < a ⊔ b ∨ b < a ⊔ b :=
h.not_le_or_not_le.symm.imp left_lt_sup.2 right_lt_sup.2
#align left_or_right_lt_sup left_or_right_lt_sup
theorem le_iff_exists_sup : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a ⊔ c := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨b, (sup_eq_right.mpr h).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨c, rfl : _ = _ ⊔ _⟩
exact le_sup_left
#align le_iff_exists_sup le_iff_exists_sup
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_le_sup (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ d :=
sup_le (le_sup_of_le_left h₁) (le_sup_of_le_right h₂)
#align sup_le_sup sup_le_sup
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_le_sup_left (h₁ : a ≤ b) (c) : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup le_rfl h₁
#align sup_le_sup_left sup_le_sup_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sup_le_sup_right (h₁ : a ≤ b) (c) : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c :=
sup_le_sup h₁ le_rfl
#align sup_le_sup_right sup_le_sup_right
| Mathlib/Order/Lattice.lean | 219 | 219 | theorem sup_idem (a : α) : a ⊔ a = a := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
#align polynomial.roots Polynomial.roots
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
-- porting noteL `‹_›` doesn't work for instance arguments
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
#align polynomial.roots_def Polynomial.roots_def
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align polynomial.roots_zero Polynomial.roots_zero
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
#align polynomial.card_roots Polynomial.card_roots
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
#align polynomial.card_roots' Polynomial.card_roots'
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C'
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
#align polynomial.count_roots Polynomial.count_roots
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
#align polynomial.mem_roots' Polynomial.mem_roots'
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
#align polynomial.mem_roots Polynomial.mem_roots
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots Polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
#align polynomial.is_root_of_mem_roots Polynomial.isRoot_of_mem_roots
-- Porting note: added during port.
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots w, IsRoot.def, aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
Z.card ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
#align polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots Polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align polynomial.finite_set_of_is_root Polynomial.finite_setOf_isRoot
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_is_root Polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_max_root Polynomial.exists_max_root
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_min_root Polynomial.exists_min_root
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq Polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
#align polynomial.roots_mul Polynomial.roots_mul
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
#align polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd Polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C'
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X Polynomial.roots_X
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C Polynomial.roots_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
#align polynomial.roots_one Polynomial.roots_one
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C_mul Polynomial.roots_C_mul
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
#align polynomial.roots_smul_nonzero Polynomial.roots_smul_nonzero
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
#align polynomial.roots_list_prod Polynomial.roots_list_prod
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
#align polynomial.roots_multiset_prod Polynomial.roots_multiset_prod
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
#align polynomial.roots_prod Polynomial.roots_prod
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction' n with n ihn
· rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
· rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
#align polynomial.roots_pow Polynomial.roots_pow
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_pow Polynomial.roots_X_pow
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.roots_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
#align polynomial.roots_monomial Polynomial.roots_monomial
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_prod_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_prod_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.card_roots_X_pow_sub_C
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
#align polynomial.zero_of_eval_zero Polynomial.zero_of_eval_zero
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
#align polynomial.funext Polynomial.funext
variable [CommRing T]
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, roots_C_mul]
rwa [map_ne_zero_iff]
exact NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective T S
@[simp]
theorem aroots_smul_nonzero [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, aroots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).aroots S = n • p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_pow, roots_pow]
theorem aroots_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_pow, aroots_X]
theorem aroots_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(C a * X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_C_mul _ ha, aroots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n a).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, aroots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
def rootSet (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Set S :=
haveI := Classical.decEq S
(p.aroots S).toFinset
#align polynomial.root_set Polynomial.rootSet
theorem rootSet_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [DecidableEq S] :
p.rootSet S = (p.aroots S).toFinset := by
rw [rootSet]
convert rfl
#align polynomial.root_set_def Polynomial.rootSet_def
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 515 | 517 | theorem rootSet_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).rootSet S = ∅ := by |
classical
rw [rootSet_def, aroots_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.coe_empty]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.braided from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.braided_category CategoryTheory.BraidedCategory
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open Category
open MonoidalCategory
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
namespace BraidedCategory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] [BraidedCategory.{v} C]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫
(β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫ (α_ Z X Y).hom := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Z X Y).inv).1
simp [hexagon_reverse]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Y Z X).hom).1
simp [hexagon_forward]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ Z X Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ Y Z X).hom ≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫
(β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (braiding Y Y').hom = (braiding X X').hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) := by
rw [tensorHom_def' f g, tensorHom_def g f]
simp_rw [Category.assoc, braiding_naturality_left, braiding_naturality_right_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_right (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
X ◁ f ≫ (β_ Z X).inv = (β_ Y X).inv ≫ f ▷ X :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_left f X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ (β_ Z Y).inv = (β_ Z X).inv ≫ Z ◁ f :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_right Z f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (β_ Y' Y).inv = (β_ X' X).inv ≫ (g ⊗ f) :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality g f
@[reassoc]
theorem yang_baxter (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X ≫ (α_ Z Y X).hom =
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom := by
rw [← braiding_tensor_right_assoc X Y Z, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).inv]
repeat rw [assoc]
rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, ← braiding_naturality_right, braiding_tensor_right]
theorem yang_baxter' (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ⊗≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X =
𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ⊗≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).hom]
convert yang_baxter X Y Z using 1
all_goals coherence
theorem yang_baxter_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) ≪≫ (α_ Y Z X).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ Y Z) X ≪≫ (α_ Z Y X) =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y ≪≫ α_ Z X Y ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Z (β_ X Y) := Iso.ext (yang_baxter X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_forward_iso (X Y Z : C) :
α_ X Y Z ≪≫ β_ X (Y ⊗ Z) ≪≫ α_ Y Z X =
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_forward X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_reverse_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≪≫ (α_ Z X Y).symm =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_reverse X Y Z)
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 181 | 184 | theorem hexagon_forward_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z := by |
simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
#align ennreal.div_eq_inv_mul ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
#align ennreal.inv_zero ENNReal.inv_zero
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
#align ennreal.inv_top ENNReal.inv_top
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
#align ennreal.coe_inv_le ENNReal.coe_inv_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr, coe_one]
#align ennreal.coe_inv ENNReal.coe_inv
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
#align ennreal.coe_inv_two ENNReal.coe_inv_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
#align ennreal.coe_div ENNReal.coe_div
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
#align ennreal.div_zero ENNReal.div_zero
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
#align ennreal.inv_pow ENNReal.inv_pow
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
#align ennreal.mul_inv_cancel ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
#align ennreal.inv_mul_cancel ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel
protected theorem div_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
#align ennreal.div_mul_cancel ENNReal.div_mul_cancel
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel h0 hI]
#align ennreal.mul_div_cancel' ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'
-- Porting note: `simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc]` doesn't work in the following two
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, ← mul_assoc]
#align ennreal.mul_comm_div ENNReal.mul_comm_div
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
#align ennreal.mul_div_right_comm ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_top ENNReal.inv_eq_top
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_top ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_top ENNReal.inv_lt_top
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_ne_top.mpr h2)
#align ennreal.div_lt_top ENNReal.div_lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_zero ENNReal.inv_eq_zero
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_zero ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
#align ennreal.div_pos ENNReal.div_pos
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
#align ennreal.mul_inv ENNReal.mul_inv
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_left ENNReal.mul_div_mul_left
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_right ENNReal.mul_div_mul_right
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
#align ennreal.sub_div ENNReal.sub_div
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
#align ennreal.inv_pos ENNReal.inv_pos
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
#align ennreal.inv_strict_anti ENNReal.inv_strictAnti
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
#align ennreal.inv_lt_inv ENNReal.inv_lt_inv
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt ENNReal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv ENNReal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
#align ennreal.inv_le_inv ENNReal.inv_le_inv
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_inv_le ENNReal.inv_le_iff_inv_le
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_le_inv ENNReal.le_inv_iff_le_inv
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_le_one ENNReal.inv_le_one
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_le_inv ENNReal.one_le_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_one ENNReal.inv_lt_one
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_lt_inv ENNReal.one_lt_inv
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal OrderIso.invENNReal
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_symm_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
#align ennreal.div_top ENNReal.div_top
-- Porting note: reordered 4 lemmas
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
#align ennreal.top_div ENNReal.top_div
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
#align ennreal.top_div_of_ne_top ENNReal.top_div_of_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.top_div_coe ENNReal.top_div_coe
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
#align ennreal.top_div_of_lt_top ENNReal.top_div_of_lt_top
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
#align ennreal.zero_div ENNReal.zero_div
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
#align ennreal.div_eq_top ENNReal.div_eq_top
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
#align ennreal.le_div_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
#align ennreal.div_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
#align ennreal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt ENNReal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul' ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul'
protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div' ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div'
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
#align ennreal.div_lt_iff ENNReal.div_lt_iff
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div'
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.inv_le_iff_le_mul
@[simp 900]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] <;>
· right
simp
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_inv_iff_mul_le
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div (hab : a ≤ b) (hdc : d ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / d :=
div_eq_mul_inv b d ▸ div_eq_mul_inv a c ▸ mul_le_mul' hab (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mpr hdc)
#align ennreal.div_le_div ENNReal.div_le_div
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
ENNReal.div_le_div le_rfl h
#align ennreal.div_le_div_left ENNReal.div_le_div_left
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
ENNReal.div_le_div h le_rfl
#align ennreal.div_le_div_right ENNReal.div_le_div_right
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h), ← mul_assoc, h,
one_mul]
rintro rfl
simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h] at h
#align ennreal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left ENNReal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
theorem mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b := by
rw [← @ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁,
one_mul]
#align ennreal.mul_le_iff_le_inv ENNReal.mul_le_iff_le_inv
instance : PosSMulStrictMono ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ where
elim _r hr _a _b hab := ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left' (coe_pos.2 hr).ne' coe_ne_top hab
instance : SMulPosMono ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ where
elim _r _ _a _b hab := mul_le_mul_right' (coe_le_coe.2 hab) _
#align ennreal.le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos
#align ennreal.inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos
theorem le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr
exact h r hr
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt ENNReal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt
theorem le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r → ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr =>
(zero_le r).eq_or_lt.elim (fun h => h ▸ zero_le _) fun h0 => h r h0 hr
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt
theorem eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique <| le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r _ => h r
#align ennreal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le
protected theorem add_div : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
right_distrib a b c⁻¹
#align ennreal.add_div ENNReal.add_div
protected theorem div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
ENNReal.add_div.symm
#align ennreal.div_add_div_same ENNReal.div_add_div_same
protected theorem div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
#align ennreal.div_self ENNReal.div_self
theorem mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
mul_le_of_le_div' le_rfl
#align ennreal.mul_div_le ENNReal.mul_div_le
theorem eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) : b = c / a ↔ a * b = c :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' ha ha'], fun h => by
rw [← h, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' ha ha']⟩
#align ennreal.eq_div_iff ENNReal.eq_div_iff
protected theorem div_eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b ≠ ∞) :
c / b = d / a ↔ a * c = b * d := by
rw [eq_div_iff ha ha']
conv_rhs => rw [eq_comm]
rw [← eq_div_iff hb hb', mul_div_assoc, eq_comm]
#align ennreal.div_eq_div_iff ENNReal.div_eq_div_iff
theorem div_eq_one_iff {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb₁ : b ≠ ∞) : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← (eq_div_iff hb₀ hb₁).mp h.symm, mul_one], fun h =>
h.symm ▸ ENNReal.div_self hb₀ hb₁⟩
#align ennreal.div_eq_one_iff ENNReal.div_eq_one_iff
theorem inv_two_add_inv_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.div_self two_ne_zero two_ne_top]
#align ennreal.inv_two_add_inv_two ENNReal.inv_two_add_inv_two
theorem inv_three_add_inv_three : (3 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 1 :=
calc (3 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 3 * 3⁻¹ := by ring
_ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| by decide) coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.inv_three_add_inv_three ENNReal.inv_three_add_inv_three
@[simp]
protected theorem add_halves (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
#align ennreal.add_halves ENNReal.add_halves
@[simp]
theorem add_thirds (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, inv_three_add_inv_three, mul_one]
#align ennreal.add_thirds ENNReal.add_thirds
@[simp] theorem div_eq_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align ennreal.div_zero_iff ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or]
#align ennreal.div_pos_iff ENNReal.div_pos_iff
protected theorem half_pos (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a / 2 := by
simp only [div_pos_iff, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true, two_ne_top, and_self]
#align ennreal.half_pos ENNReal.half_pos
protected theorem one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 :=
ENNReal.inv_lt_one.2 <| one_lt_two
#align ennreal.one_half_lt_one ENNReal.one_half_lt_one
protected theorem half_lt_self (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a / 2 < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
rw [coe_ne_zero] at hz
rw [← coe_two, ← coe_div, coe_lt_coe]
exacts [NNReal.half_lt_self hz, two_ne_zero' _]
#align ennreal.half_lt_self ENNReal.half_lt_self
protected theorem half_le_self : a / 2 ≤ a :=
le_add_self.trans_eq <| ENNReal.add_halves _
#align ennreal.half_le_self ENNReal.half_le_self
theorem sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h
exact sub_eq_of_add_eq (mul_ne_top coe_ne_top <| by simp) (ENNReal.add_halves a)
#align ennreal.sub_half ENNReal.sub_half
@[simp]
theorem one_sub_inv_two : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul] using sub_half one_ne_top
#align ennreal.one_sub_inv_two ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two
@[simps! apply_coe]
def orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
refine StrictMono.orderIsoOfRightInverse
(fun x => ⟨(x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹, ENNReal.inv_le_one.2 <| le_add_self⟩)
(fun x y hxy => ?_) (fun x => (x.1⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹) fun x => Subtype.ext ?_
· simpa only [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_right one_ne_top]
· have : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ x.1⁻¹ := ENNReal.one_le_inv.2 x.2
simp only [inv_inv, Subtype.coe_mk, tsub_add_cancel_of_le this]
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_one_birational ENNReal.orderIsoIicOneBirational
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIicOneBirational_symm_apply (x : Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) :
orderIsoIicOneBirational.symm x = (x.1⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_one_birational_symm_apply ENNReal.orderIsoIicOneBirational_symm_apply
@[simps! apply_coe]
def orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a :=
OrderIso.symm
{ toFun := fun x => ⟨x, coe_le_coe.2 x.2⟩
invFun := fun x => ⟨ENNReal.toNNReal x, coe_le_coe.1 <| coe_toNNReal_le_self.trans x.2⟩
left_inv := fun x => Subtype.ext <| toNNReal_coe
right_inv := fun x => Subtype.ext <| coe_toNNReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top coe_ne_top x.2)
map_rel_iff' := fun {_ _} => by
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.mk_le_mk, coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_le_coe] }
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_coe ENNReal.orderIsoIicCoe
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIicCoe_symm_apply_coe (a : ℝ≥0) (b : Iic a) :
((orderIsoIicCoe a).symm b : ℝ≥0∞) = b :=
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_Iic_coe_symm_apply_coe ENNReal.orderIsoIicCoe_symm_apply_coe
def orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
orderIsoIicOneBirational.trans <| (orderIsoIicCoe 1).trans <| (NNReal.orderIsoIccZeroCoe 1).symm
#align ennreal.order_iso_unit_interval_birational ENNReal.orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational_apply_coe (x : ℝ≥0∞) :
(orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational x : ℝ) = (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹.toReal :=
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_unit_interval_birational_apply_coe ENNReal.orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational_apply_coe
theorem exists_inv_nat_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ 0) : ∃ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ < a :=
inv_inv a ▸ by simp only [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (inv_ne_top.2 h)]
#align ennreal.exists_inv_nat_lt ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt
theorem exists_nat_pos_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : ∃ n > 0, b < (n : ℕ) * a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (div_lt_top hb ha).ne
⟨n, Nat.cast_pos.1 ((zero_le _).trans_lt hn), by
rwa [← ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl ha) (Or.inr hb)]⟩
#align ennreal.exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ENNReal.exists_nat_pos_mul_gt
theorem exists_nat_mul_gt (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * a :=
(exists_nat_pos_mul_gt ha hb).imp fun _ => And.right
#align ennreal.exists_nat_mul_gt ENNReal.exists_nat_mul_gt
theorem exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ n > 0, ((n : ℕ) : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * a < b := by
rcases exists_nat_pos_mul_gt hb ha with ⟨n, npos, hn⟩
use n, npos
rw [← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_lt_of_lt_mul' hn
#align ennreal.exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ENNReal.exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 573 | 576 | theorem exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : ∃ n > 0, ↑(n : ℝ≥0) * a < b := by |
rcases exists_nat_pos_inv_mul_lt ha hb with ⟨n, npos : 0 < n, hn⟩
use (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹
simp [*, npos.ne', zero_lt_one]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.ArctanDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
#align_import analysis.special_functions.integrals from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"011cafb4a5bc695875d186e245d6b3df03bf6c40"
open Real Nat Set Finset
open scoped Real Interval
variable {a b : ℝ} (n : ℕ)
open intervalIntegral
theorem integral_cpow {r : ℂ} (h : -1 < r.re ∨ r ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (x : ℂ) ^ r) = ((b:ℂ) ^ (r + 1) - (a:ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
rw [sub_div]
have hr : r + 1 ≠ 0 := by
cases' h with h h
· apply_fun Complex.re
rw [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re, Complex.zero_re, Ne, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
exact h.ne'
· rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h; exact h.1
by_cases hab : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]
· apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun x hx => ?_)
(intervalIntegrable_cpow (r := r) <| Or.inr hab)
refine hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx hab) ?_
contrapose! hr; rwa [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
replace h : -1 < r.re := by tauto
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, (∫ x : ℝ in (0)..c, (x : ℂ) ^ r) =
(c:ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) - (0:ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) by
rw [← integral_add_adjacent_intervals (@intervalIntegrable_cpow' a 0 r h)
(@intervalIntegrable_cpow' 0 b r h), integral_symm, this a, this b, Complex.zero_cpow hr]
ring
intro c
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDeriv_right
· refine ((Complex.continuous_ofReal_cpow_const ?_).div_const _).continuousOn
rwa [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add]
· refine fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow ?_ ?_).hasDerivWithinAt
· rcases le_total c 0 with (hc | hc)
· rw [max_eq_left hc] at hx; exact hx.2.ne
· rw [min_eq_left hc] at hx; exact hx.1.ne'
· contrapose! hr; rw [hr]; ring
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow' h
#align integral_cpow integral_cpow
theorem integral_rpow {r : ℝ} (h : -1 < r ∨ r ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, x ^ r = (b ^ (r + 1) - a ^ (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
have h' : -1 < (r : ℂ).re ∨ (r : ℂ) ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]] := by
cases h
· left; rwa [Complex.ofReal_re]
· right; rwa [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Ne, Complex.ofReal_inj]
have :
(∫ x in a..b, (x : ℂ) ^ (r : ℂ)) = ((b : ℂ) ^ (r + 1 : ℂ) - (a : ℂ) ^ (r + 1 : ℂ)) / (r + 1) :=
integral_cpow h'
apply_fun Complex.re at this; convert this
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, Complex.real_smul, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
-- Porting note: was `change ... with ...`
have : Complex.re = RCLike.re := rfl
rw [this, ← integral_re]
· rfl
refine intervalIntegrable_iff.mp ?_
cases' h' with h' h'
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow' h'
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow (Or.inr h'.2)
· rw [(by push_cast; rfl : (r : ℂ) + 1 = ((r + 1 : ℝ) : ℂ))]
simp_rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← Complex.ofReal_inv, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, Complex.sub_re]
rfl
#align integral_rpow integral_rpow
theorem integral_zpow {n : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ n ∨ n ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, x ^ n = (b ^ (n + 1) - a ^ (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := by
replace h : -1 < (n : ℝ) ∨ (n : ℝ) ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]] := mod_cast h
exact mod_cast integral_rpow h
#align integral_zpow integral_zpow
@[simp]
theorem integral_pow : ∫ x in a..b, x ^ n = (b ^ (n + 1) - a ^ (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := by
simpa only [← Int.ofNat_succ, zpow_natCast] using integral_zpow (Or.inl n.cast_nonneg)
#align integral_pow integral_pow
theorem integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc : ∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by
rcases le_or_lt a b with hab | hab
· calc
∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = ∫ x in a..b, |x - a| ^ n := by
rw [uIoc_of_le hab, ← integral_of_le hab]
_ = ∫ x in (0)..(b - a), x ^ n := by
simp only [integral_comp_sub_right fun x => |x| ^ n, sub_self]
refine integral_congr fun x hx => congr_arg₂ Pow.pow (abs_of_nonneg <| ?_) rfl
rw [uIcc_of_le (sub_nonneg.2 hab)] at hx
exact hx.1
_ = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by simp [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hab)]
· calc
∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = ∫ x in b..a, |x - a| ^ n := by
rw [uIoc_of_lt hab, ← integral_of_le hab.le]
_ = ∫ x in b - a..0, (-x) ^ n := by
simp only [integral_comp_sub_right fun x => |x| ^ n, sub_self]
refine integral_congr fun x hx => congr_arg₂ Pow.pow (abs_of_nonpos <| ?_) rfl
rw [uIcc_of_le (sub_nonpos.2 hab.le)] at hx
exact hx.2
_ = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by
simp [integral_comp_neg fun x => x ^ n, abs_of_neg (sub_neg.2 hab)]
#align integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc
@[simp]
theorem integral_id : ∫ x in a..b, x = (b ^ 2 - a ^ 2) / 2 := by
have := @integral_pow a b 1
norm_num at this
exact this
#align integral_id integral_id
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem integral_one : (∫ _ in a..b, (1 : ℝ)) = b - a := by
simp only [mul_one, smul_eq_mul, integral_const]
#align integral_one integral_one
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Integrals.lean | 452 | 452 | theorem integral_const_on_unit_interval : ∫ _ in a..a + 1, b = b := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.MemPartition
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableSeparatingOn
open Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
variable {α β : Type*}
class CountablyGenerated (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
isCountablyGenerated : ∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ m = generateFrom b
#align measurable_space.countably_generated MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
def countableGeneratingSet (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set (Set α) :=
insert ∅ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose
lemma countable_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Countable (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
Countable.insert _ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.1
lemma generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet [m : MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
generateFrom (countableGeneratingSet α) = m :=
(generateFrom_insert_empty _).trans <| h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.2.symm
lemma empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
∅ ∈ countableGeneratingSet α := mem_insert _ _
lemma nonempty_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Nonempty (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
⟨∅, mem_insert _ _⟩
lemma measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
{s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ countableGeneratingSet α) :
MeasurableSet s := by
rw [← generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)]
exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
def natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] : ℕ → (Set α) :=
enumerateCountable (countable_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)) ∅
lemma generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] : generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _)) = m := by
rw [natGeneratingSequence, range_enumerateCountable_of_mem _ empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet,
generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet]
lemma measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (n : ℕ) :
MeasurableSet (natGeneratingSequence α n) :=
measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet $ Set.enumerateCountable_mem _
empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet n
theorem CountablyGenerated.comap [m : MeasurableSpace β] [h : CountablyGenerated β] (f : α → β) :
@CountablyGenerated α (.comap f m) := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨b, hbc, rfl⟩⟩
rw [comap_generateFrom]
letI := generateFrom (preimage f '' b)
exact ⟨_, hbc.image _, rfl⟩
theorem CountablyGenerated.sup {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} (h₁ : @CountablyGenerated β m₁)
(h₂ : @CountablyGenerated β m₂) : @CountablyGenerated β (m₁ ⊔ m₂) := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁c, rfl⟩⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂c, rfl⟩⟩
exact @mk _ (_ ⊔ _) ⟨_, hb₁c.union hb₂c, generateFrom_sup_generateFrom⟩
instance (priority := 100) [MeasurableSpace α] [Countable α] : CountablyGenerated α where
isCountablyGenerated := by
refine ⟨⋃ y, {measurableAtom y}, countable_iUnion (fun i ↦ countable_singleton _), ?_⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le (by simp [MeasurableSet.measurableAtom_of_countable]))
intro s hs
have : s = ⋃ y ∈ s, measurableAtom y := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro x hx
simpa using ⟨x, hx, by simp⟩
· simp only [iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x hx
exact measurableAtom_subset hs hx
rw [this]
apply MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable s) (fun x _hx ↦ ?_)
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
simp
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] {p : α → Prop} :
CountablyGenerated { x // p x } := .comap _
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] [MeasurableSpace β] [CountablyGenerated β] :
CountablyGenerated (α × β) :=
.sup (.comap Prod.fst) (.comap Prod.snd)
section SeparatesPoints
class SeparatesPoints (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
separates : ∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) → x = y
theorem separatesPoints_def [MeasurableSpace α] [hs : SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) : x = y := hs.separates _ _ h
theorem exists_measurableSet_of_ne [MeasurableSpace α] [SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : x ≠ y) : ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∉ s := by
contrapose! h
exact separatesPoints_def h
theorem separatesPoints_iff [MeasurableSpace α] : SeparatesPoints α ↔
∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s)) → x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ fun _ _ hxy ↦ h.separates _ _ fun _ hs xs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp xs,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ h _ _ fun _ hs ↦
⟨fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs xs, not_imp_not.mp fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs.compl xs⟩⟩⟩
theorem separating_of_generateFrom (S : Set (Set α))
[h : @SeparatesPoints α (generateFrom S)] :
∀ x y : α, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y := by
letI := generateFrom S
intros x y hxy
rw [← forall_generateFrom_mem_iff_mem_iff] at hxy
exact separatesPoints_def $ fun _ hs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp
theorem SeparatesPoints.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @SeparatesPoints _ m] (h : m ≤ m') :
@SeparatesPoints _ m' := @SeparatesPoints.mk _ m' fun _ _ hxy ↦
@SeparatesPoints.separates _ m hsep _ _ fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ (h _ hs)
class CountablySeparated (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
countably_separated : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ
instance countablySeparated_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ] : CountablySeparated α := ⟨h⟩
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
h.countably_separated
theorem countablySeparated_def [MeasurableSpace α] :
CountablySeparated α ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.countably_separated, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/CountablyGenerated.lean | 185 | 189 | theorem CountablySeparated.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @CountablySeparated _ m]
(h : m ≤ m') : @CountablySeparated _ m' := by |
simp_rw [countablySeparated_def] at *
rcases hsep with ⟨S, Sct, Smeas, hS⟩
use S, Sct, (fun s hs ↦ h _ <| Smeas _ hs), hS
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Complex
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DivergenceTheorem
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Dslope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.ReImTopology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DiffContOnCl
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
#align_import analysis.complex.cauchy_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
open TopologicalSpace Set MeasureTheory intervalIntegral Metric Filter Function
open scoped Interval Real NNReal ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]
namespace Complex
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I := by
set e : (ℝ × ℝ) ≃L[ℝ] ℂ := equivRealProdCLM.symm
have he : ∀ x y : ℝ, ↑x + ↑y * I = e (x, y) := fun x y => (mk_eq_add_mul_I x y).symm
have he₁ : e (1, 0) = 1 := rfl; have he₂ : e (0, 1) = I := rfl
simp only [he] at *
set F : ℝ × ℝ → E := f ∘ e
set F' : ℝ × ℝ → ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] E := fun p => (f' (e p)).comp (e : ℝ × ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ)
have hF' : ∀ p : ℝ × ℝ, (-(I • F' p)) (1, 0) + F' p (0, 1) = -(I • f' (e p) 1 - f' (e p) I) := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [F', ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, he₁, he₂, neg_add_eq_sub,
neg_sub]
set R : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := [[z.re, w.re]] ×ˢ [[w.im, z.im]]
set t : Set (ℝ × ℝ) := e ⁻¹' s
rw [uIcc_comm z.im] at Hc Hi; rw [min_comm z.im, max_comm z.im] at Hd
have hR : e ⁻¹' ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[w.im, z.im]]) = R := rfl
have htc : ContinuousOn F R := Hc.comp e.continuousOn hR.ge
have htd :
∀ p ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ˢ Ioo (min w.im z.im) (max w.im z.im) \ t,
HasFDerivAt F (F' p) p :=
fun p hp => (Hd (e p) hp).comp p e.hasFDerivAt
simp_rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_smul, intervalIntegral.integral_symm w.im z.im, ←
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, ← hF']
refine (integral2_divergence_prod_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable (fun p => -(I • F p)) F
(fun p => -(I • F' p)) F' z.re w.im w.re z.im t (hs.preimage e.injective)
(htc.const_smul _).neg htc (fun p hp => ((htd p hp).const_smul I).neg) htd ?_).symm
rw [← (volume_preserving_equiv_real_prod.symm _).integrableOn_comp_preimage
(MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _)] at Hi
simpa only [hF'] using Hi.neg
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_has_fderiv_at_real_off_countable Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real (f : ℂ → E) (f' : ℂ → ℂ →L[ℝ] E)
(z w : ℂ) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im),
HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • f' z 1 - f' z I) ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, I • f' (x + y * I) 1 - f' (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f f' z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
(fun x hx => Hd x hx.1) Hi
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_continuous_on_of_has_fderiv_at_real Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_continuousOn_of_hasFDerivAt_real
theorem integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℝ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun z => I • fderiv ℝ f z 1 - fderiv ℝ f z I)
([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) =
∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, ∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im,
I • fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) 1 - fderiv ℝ f (x + y * I) I :=
integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f (fderiv ℝ f) z w ∅ countable_empty
Hd.continuousOn
(fun x hx => Hd.hasFDerivAt <| by
simpa only [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_reProdIm, uIcc, interior_Icc] using hx.1)
Hi
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiable_on_real Complex.integral_boundary_rect_of_differentiableOn_real
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(s : Set ℂ) (hs : s.Countable) (Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im) \ s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 := by
refine (integral_boundary_rect_of_hasFDerivAt_real_off_countable f
(fun z => (fderiv ℂ f z).restrictScalars ℝ) z w s hs Hc
(fun x hx => (Hd x hx).hasFDerivAt.restrictScalars ℝ) ?_).trans ?_ <;>
simp [← ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(Hc : ContinuousOn f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]))
(Hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f
(Ioo (min z.re w.re) (max z.re w.re) ×ℂ Ioo (min z.im w.im) (max z.im w.im))) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable f z w ∅ countable_empty Hc
fun _x hx => Hd.differentiableAt <| (isOpen_Ioo.reProdIm isOpen_Ioo).mem_nhds hx.1
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuous_on_of_differentiable_on Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn
theorem integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn (f : ℂ → E) (z w : ℂ)
(H : DifferentiableOn ℂ f ([[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]])) :
(∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + z.im * I)) - (∫ x : ℝ in z.re..w.re, f (x + w.im * I)) +
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re w + y * I)) -
I • (∫ y : ℝ in z.im..w.im, f (re z + y * I)) = 0 :=
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_continuousOn_of_differentiableOn f z w H.continuousOn <|
H.mono <|
inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) (preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on Complex.integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable {c : ℂ}
{r R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (hle : r ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ ball c r))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ closedBall c r) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z := by
set A := closedBall c R \ ball c r
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ a, Real.exp a = r := ⟨Real.log r, Real.exp_log h0⟩
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, Real.exp b = R := ⟨Real.log R, Real.exp_log (h0.trans_le hle)⟩
rw [Real.exp_le_exp] at hle
-- Unfold definition of `circleIntegral` and cancel some terms.
suffices
(∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, I • f (circleMap c (Real.exp b) θ)) =
∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, I • f (circleMap c (Real.exp a) θ) by
simpa only [circleIntegral, add_sub_cancel_left, ofReal_exp, ← exp_add, smul_smul, ←
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (circleMap_ne_center (Real.exp_pos _).ne'),
circleMap_sub_center, deriv_circleMap]
set R := [[a, b]] ×ℂ [[0, 2 * π]]
set g : ℂ → ℂ := (c + exp ·)
have hdg : Differentiable ℂ g := differentiable_exp.const_add _
replace hs : (g ⁻¹' s).Countable := (hs.preimage (add_right_injective c)).preimage_cexp
have h_maps : MapsTo g R A := by rintro z ⟨h, -⟩; simpa [g, A, dist_eq, abs_exp, hle] using h.symm
replace hc : ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) R := hc.comp hdg.continuous.continuousOn h_maps
replace hd : ∀ z ∈ Ioo (min a b) (max a b) ×ℂ Ioo (min 0 (2 * π)) (max 0 (2 * π)) \ g ⁻¹' s,
DifferentiableAt ℂ (f ∘ g) z := by
refine fun z hz => (hd (g z) ⟨?_, hz.2⟩).comp z (hdg _)
simpa [g, dist_eq, abs_exp, hle, and_comm] using hz.1.1
simpa [g, circleMap, exp_periodic _, sub_eq_zero, ← exp_add] using
integral_boundary_rect_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable _ ⟨a, 0⟩ ⟨b, 2 * π⟩ _ hs hc hd
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable
theorem circleIntegral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable {c : ℂ} {r R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r)
(hle : r ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ ball c r))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ closedBall c r) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, r), f z :=
calc
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable h0 hle hs
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).smul hc) fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_id.sub_const _).smul (hd z hz))
_ = ∮ z in C(c, r), f z := circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _
#align complex.circle_integral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto {c : ℂ}
{R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < R) {f : ℂ → E} {y : E} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R \ {c}))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ (ball c R \ {c}) \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) (hy : Tendsto f (𝓝[{c}ᶜ] c) (𝓝 y)) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
refine le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun ε ε0 => ?_
obtain ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ z ∈ closedBall c δ \ {c}, dist (f z) y < ε / (2 * π) :=
((nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_closedBall _).tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).1 hy _
(div_pos ε0 Real.two_pi_pos)
obtain ⟨r, hr0, hrδ, hrR⟩ : ∃ r, 0 < r ∧ r ≤ δ ∧ r ≤ R :=
⟨min δ R, lt_min δ0 h0, min_le_left _ _, min_le_right _ _⟩
have hsub : closedBall c R \ ball c r ⊆ closedBall c R \ {c} :=
diff_subset_diff_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_ball_self hr0)
have hsub' : ball c R \ closedBall c r ⊆ ball c R \ {c} :=
diff_subset_diff_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_closedBall_self hr0.le)
have hzne : ∀ z ∈ sphere c r, z ≠ c := fun z hz =>
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz fun h => hr0.ne' <| dist_self c ▸ Eq.symm h
calc
‖(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) - (2 * ↑π * I) • y‖ =
‖(∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) - ∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • y‖ := by
congr 2
· exact circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_eq_of_differentiable_on_annulus_off_countable hr0
hrR hs (hc.mono hsub) fun z hz => hd z ⟨hsub' hz.1, hz.2⟩
· simp [hr0.ne']
_ = ‖∮ z in C(c, r), (z - c)⁻¹ • (f z - y)‖ := by
simp only [smul_sub]
have hc' : ContinuousOn (fun z => (z - c)⁻¹) (sphere c r) :=
(continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ fun z hz => sub_ne_zero.2 <| hzne _ hz
rw [circleIntegral.integral_sub] <;> refine (hc'.smul ?_).circleIntegrable hr0.le
· exact hc.mono <| subset_inter
(sphere_subset_closedBall.trans <| closedBall_subset_closedBall hrR) hzne
· exact continuousOn_const
_ ≤ 2 * π * r * (r⁻¹ * (ε / (2 * π))) := by
refine circleIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hr0.le fun z hz => ?_
specialize hzne z hz
rw [mem_sphere, dist_eq_norm] at hz
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, hz, ← dist_eq_norm]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hδ _ ⟨?_, hzne⟩).le (inv_nonneg.2 hr0.le)
rwa [mem_closedBall_iff_norm, hz]
_ = ε := by field_simp [hr0.ne', Real.two_pi_pos.ne']; ac_rfl
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto
theorem circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < R)
{f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • f z) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f c :=
circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable_of_tendsto h0 hs
(hc.mono diff_subset) (fun z hz => hd z ⟨hz.1.1, hz.2⟩)
(hc.continuousAt <| closedBall_mem_nhds _ h0).continuousWithinAt
#align complex.circle_integral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable Complex.circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/CauchyIntegral.lean | 410 | 421 | theorem circleIntegral_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_off_countable {R : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ R) {f : ℂ → E}
{c : ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (hc : ContinuousOn f (closedBall c R))
(hd : ∀ z ∈ ball c R \ s, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) : (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = 0 := by |
rcases h0.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h0); · apply circleIntegral.integral_radius_zero
calc
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹ • (z - c) • f z :=
(circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul _ _ _ _).symm
_ = (2 * ↑π * I : ℂ) • (c - c) • f c :=
(circleIntegral_sub_center_inv_smul_of_differentiable_on_off_countable h0 hs
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).smul hc) fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_id.sub_const _).smul (hd z hz))
_ = 0 := by rw [sub_self, zero_smul, smul_zero]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.simple_func from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
structure SimpleFunc.{u, v} (α : Type u) [MeasurableSpace α] (β : Type v) where
toFun : α → β
measurableSet_fiber' : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (toFun ⁻¹' {x})
finite_range' : (Set.range toFun).Finite
#align measure_theory.simple_func MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
#align measure_theory.simple_func.to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.toFun
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range'
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →ₛ β) fun _ => α → β :=
⟨toFun⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instCoeFun
theorem coe_injective ⦃f g : α →ₛ β⦄ (H : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_injective MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ₛ β} (H : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
coe_injective <| funext H
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ext MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ext
theorem finite_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (Set.range f).Finite :=
f.finite_range'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range
theorem measurableSet_fiber (f : α →ₛ β) (x : β) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
f.measurableSet_fiber' x
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem apply_mk (f : α → β) (h h') (x : α) : SimpleFunc.mk f h h' x = f x :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.apply_mk MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.apply_mk
def ofFinite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : α →ₛ β where
toFun := f
measurableSet_fiber' x := (toFinite (f ⁻¹' {x})).measurableSet
finite_range' := Set.finite_range f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")] alias ofFintype := ofFinite
def ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : α →ₛ β := ofFinite isEmptyElim
#align measure_theory.simple_func.of_is_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ofIsEmpty
protected def range (f : α →ₛ β) : Finset β :=
f.finite_range.toFinset
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {b} : b ∈ f.range ↔ b ∈ range f :=
Finite.mem_toFinset _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range
theorem mem_range_self (f : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : f x ∈ f.range :=
mem_range.2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range_self MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range_self
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (↑f.range : Set β) = Set.range f :=
f.finite_range.coe_toFinset
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_range
theorem mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero {f : α →ₛ β} {x : β} {μ : Measure α} (H : μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) ≠ 0) :
x ∈ f.range :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero H
mem_range.2 ⟨a, ha⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero
theorem forall_mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) := by
simp only [mem_range, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.forall_mem_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.forall_mem_range
theorem exists_range_iff {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) := by
simpa only [mem_range, exists_prop] using Set.exists_range_iff
#align measure_theory.simple_func.exists_range_iff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.exists_range_iff
theorem preimage_eq_empty_iff (f : α →ₛ β) (b : β) : f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ↔ b ∉ f.range :=
preimage_singleton_eq_empty.trans <| not_congr mem_range.symm
#align measure_theory.simple_func.preimage_eq_empty_iff MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.preimage_eq_empty_iff
theorem exists_forall_le [Nonempty β] [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] (f : α →ₛ β) :
∃ C, ∀ x, f x ≤ C :=
f.range.exists_le.imp fun _ => forall_mem_range.1
#align measure_theory.simple_func.exists_forall_le MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.exists_forall_le
def const (α) {β} [MeasurableSpace α] (b : β) : α →ₛ β :=
⟨fun _ => b, fun _ => MeasurableSet.const _, finite_range_const⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const
instance instInhabited [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨const _ default⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.inhabited MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instInhabited
theorem const_apply (a : α) (b : β) : (const α b) a = b :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.const_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.const_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_const
@[simp]
theorem range_const (α) [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty α] (b : β) : (const α b).range = {b} :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Function.const]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_const
theorem range_const_subset (α) [MeasurableSpace α] (b : β) : (const α b).range ⊆ {b} :=
Finset.coe_subset.1 <| by simp
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_const_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_const_subset
theorem simpleFunc_bot {α} (f : @SimpleFunc α ⊥ β) [Nonempty β] : ∃ c, ∀ x, f x = c := by
have hf_meas := @SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber α _ ⊥ f
simp_rw [MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_bot_iff] at hf_meas
exact (exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton hf_meas).imp fun c hc ↦ congr_fun hc
#align measure_theory.simple_func.simple_func_bot MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot
theorem simpleFunc_bot' {α} [Nonempty β] (f : @SimpleFunc α ⊥ β) :
∃ c, f = @SimpleFunc.const α _ ⊥ c :=
letI : MeasurableSpace α := ⊥; (simpleFunc_bot f).imp fun _ ↦ ext
#align measure_theory.simple_func.simple_func_bot' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot'
theorem measurableSet_cut (r : α → β → Prop) (f : α →ₛ β) (h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet { a | r a b }) :
MeasurableSet { a | r a (f a) } := by
have : { a | r a (f a) } = ⋃ b ∈ range f, { a | r a b } ∩ f ⁻¹' {b} := by
ext a
suffices r a (f a) ↔ ∃ i, r a (f i) ∧ f a = f i by simpa
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ⟨h, rfl⟩⟩, fun ⟨a', ⟨h', e⟩⟩ => e.symm ▸ h'⟩
rw [this]
exact
MeasurableSet.biUnion f.finite_range.countable fun b _ =>
MeasurableSet.inter (h b) (f.measurableSet_fiber _)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_cut MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_cut
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (s) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) :=
measurableSet_cut (fun _ b => b ∈ s) f fun b => MeasurableSet.const (b ∈ s)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_preimage
@[measurability]
protected theorem measurable [MeasurableSpace β] (f : α →ₛ β) : Measurable f := fun s _ =>
measurableSet_preimage f s
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurable
@[measurability]
protected theorem aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure α} (f : α →ₛ β) :
AEMeasurable f μ :=
f.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.aemeasurable
protected theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) {μ : Measure α} (s : Finset β) :
(∑ y ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) :=
sum_measure_preimage_singleton _ fun _ _ => f.measurableSet_fiber _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (μ : Measure α) :
(∑ y ∈ f.range, μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) = μ univ := by
rw [f.sum_measure_preimage_singleton, coe_range, preimage_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton
def piecewise (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ β :=
⟨s.piecewise f g, fun _ =>
letI : MeasurableSpace β := ⊤
f.measurable.piecewise hs g.measurable trivial,
(f.finite_range.union g.finite_range).subset range_ite_subset⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise
@[simp]
theorem coe_piecewise {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) :
⇑(piecewise s hs f g) = s.piecewise f g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_piecewise MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise
theorem piecewise_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) (a) :
piecewise s hs f g a = if a ∈ s then f a else g a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_apply
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_compl {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet sᶜ) (f g : α →ₛ β) :
piecewise sᶜ hs f g = piecewise s hs.of_compl g f :=
coe_injective <| by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp [hs]; convert Set.piecewise_compl s f g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_compl MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_compl
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_univ (f g : α →ₛ β) : piecewise univ MeasurableSet.univ f g = f :=
coe_injective <| by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp; convert Set.piecewise_univ f g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_univ MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_univ
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_empty (f g : α →ₛ β) : piecewise ∅ MeasurableSet.empty f g = g :=
coe_injective <| by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp; convert Set.piecewise_empty f g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.piecewise_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.piecewise_empty
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_same (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s hs f f = f :=
coe_injective <| Set.piecewise_same _ _
theorem support_indicator [Zero β] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α →ₛ β) :
Function.support (f.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const α 0)) = s ∩ Function.support f :=
Set.support_indicator
#align measure_theory.simple_func.support_indicator MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.support_indicator
theorem range_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hs_nonempty : s.Nonempty)
(hs_ne_univ : s ≠ univ) (x y : β) :
(piecewise s hs (const α x) (const α y)).range = {x, y} := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_inj, coe_range, coe_piecewise, range_piecewise, coe_const,
Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_singleton, hs_nonempty.image_const,
(nonempty_compl.2 hs_ne_univ).image_const, singleton_union, Function.const]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_indicator MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_indicator
theorem measurable_bind [MeasurableSpace γ] (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α → γ)
(hg : ∀ b, Measurable (g b)) : Measurable fun a => g (f a) a := fun s hs =>
f.measurableSet_cut (fun a b => g b a ∈ s) fun b => hg b hs
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_bind MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurable_bind
def bind (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α →ₛ γ) : α →ₛ γ :=
⟨fun a => g (f a) a, fun c =>
f.measurableSet_cut (fun a b => g b a = c) fun b => (g b).measurableSet_preimage {c},
(f.finite_range.biUnion fun b _ => (g b).finite_range).subset <| by
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩; simp⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.bind MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α →ₛ γ) (a) : f.bind g a = g (f a) a :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.bind_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.bind_apply
def map (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ γ :=
bind f (const α ∘ g)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map
theorem map_apply (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a) : f.map g a = g (f a) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_apply
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (h : γ → δ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g).map h = f.map (h ∘ g) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g : α → γ) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem range_map [DecidableEq γ] (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g).range = f.range.image g :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_range, coe_map, Finset.coe_image, range_comp]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_map MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_map
@[simp]
theorem map_const (g : β → γ) (b : β) : (const α b).map g = const α (g b) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_const
theorem map_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → γ) (s : Set γ) :
f.map g ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' ↑(f.range.filter fun b => g b ∈ s) := by
simp only [coe_range, sep_mem_eq, coe_map, Finset.coe_filter,
← mem_preimage, inter_comm, preimage_inter_range, ← Finset.mem_coe]
exact preimage_comp
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_preimage
theorem map_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → γ) (c : γ) :
f.map g ⁻¹' {c} = f ⁻¹' ↑(f.range.filter fun b => g b = c) :=
map_preimage _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_preimage_singleton
def comp [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) (g : α → β) (hgm : Measurable g) : α →ₛ γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
finite_range' := f.finite_range.subset <| Set.range_comp_subset_range _ _
measurableSet_fiber' z := hgm (f.measurableSet_fiber z)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.comp MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.comp
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hgm : Measurable g) :
⇑(f.comp g hgm) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_comp MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_comp
theorem range_comp_subset_range [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hgm : Measurable g) :
(f.comp g hgm).range ⊆ f.range :=
Finset.coe_subset.1 <| by simp only [coe_range, coe_comp, Set.range_comp_subset_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range_comp_subset_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range_comp_subset_range
def extend [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) (g : α → β) (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : β →ₛ γ where
toFun := Function.extend g f₁ f₂
finite_range' :=
(f₁.finite_range.union <| f₂.finite_range.subset (image_subset_range _ _)).subset
(range_extend_subset _ _ _)
measurableSet_fiber' := by
letI : MeasurableSpace γ := ⊤; haveI : MeasurableSingletonClass γ := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
exact fun x => hg.measurable_extend f₁.measurable f₂.measurable (measurableSet_singleton _)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) (x : α) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂) (g x) = f₁ x :=
hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_apply
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply' [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) {y : β} (h : ¬∃ x, g x = y) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂) y = f₂ y :=
Function.extend_apply' _ _ _ h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_apply' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_apply'
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp_eq' [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : f₁.extend g hg f₂ ∘ g = f₁ :=
funext fun _ => extend_apply _ _ _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_comp_eq' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_comp_eq'
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp_eq [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂).comp g hg.measurable = f₁ :=
coe_injective <| extend_comp_eq' _ hg _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.extend_comp_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.extend_comp_eq
def seq (f : α →ₛ β → γ) (g : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ γ :=
f.bind fun f => g.map f
#align measure_theory.simple_func.seq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.seq
@[simp]
theorem seq_apply (f : α →ₛ β → γ) (g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : f.seq g a = f a (g a) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.seq_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.seq_apply
def pair (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) : α →ₛ β × γ :=
(f.map Prod.mk).seq g
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair
@[simp]
theorem pair_apply (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (a) : pair f g a = (f a, g a) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair_apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair_apply
theorem pair_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (s : Set β) (t : Set γ) :
pair f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pair_preimage MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.pair_preimage
-- A special form of `pair_preimage`
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFunc.lean | 421 | 424 | theorem pair_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (b : β) (c : γ) :
pair f g ⁻¹' {(b, c)} = f ⁻¹' {b} ∩ g ⁻¹' {c} := by |
rw [← singleton_prod_singleton]
exact pair_preimage _ _ _ _
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate
open Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
#align nnreal.rpow NNReal.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_pow NNReal.rpow_eq_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_rpow NNReal.coe_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
#align nnreal.rpow_zero NNReal.rpow_zero
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff NNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
#align nnreal.zero_rpow NNReal.zero_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
#align nnreal.rpow_one NNReal.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
#align nnreal.one_rpow NNReal.one_rpow
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
#align nnreal.rpow_add NNReal.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_add' NNReal.rpow_add'
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
#align nnreal.rpow_mul NNReal.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
#align nnreal.rpow_neg NNReal.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
#align nnreal.rpow_neg_one NNReal.rpow_neg_one
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
#align nnreal.rpow_sub NNReal.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_sub' NNReal.rpow_sub'
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_inv_rpow_self NNReal.rpow_inv_rpow_self
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_self_rpow_inv NNReal.rpow_self_rpow_inv
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
#align nnreal.inv_rpow NNReal.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
#align nnreal.div_rpow NNReal.div_rpow
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
#align nnreal.sqrt_eq_rpow NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
#align nnreal.rpow_nat_cast NNReal.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
#align nnreal.rpow_two NNReal.rpow_two
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
#align nnreal.mul_rpow NNReal.mul_rpow
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
#align ennreal.rpow ENNReal.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
#align ennreal.rpow_eq_pow ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
#align ennreal.rpow_zero ENNReal.rpow_zero
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
#align ennreal.top_rpow_def ENNReal.top_rpow_def
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
#align ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
#align ennreal.top_rpow_of_neg ENNReal.top_rpow_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_of_neg ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_neg
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_def ENNReal.zero_rpow_def
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_mul_self ENNReal.zero_rpow_mul_self
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
#align ennreal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
#align ennreal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
#align ennreal.coe_rpow_def ENNReal.coe_rpow_def
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
#align ennreal.rpow_one ENNReal.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
#align ennreal.one_rpow ENNReal.one_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases' x with x
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
#align ennreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases' x with x
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
#align ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
#align ennreal.rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
#align ennreal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
#align ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
cases' x with x
· exact (h'x rfl).elim
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simp [h] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_add this]
#align ennreal.rpow_add ENNReal.rpow_add
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
cases' x with x
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· have A : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, NNReal.rpow_neg]
#align ennreal.rpow_neg ENNReal.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align ennreal.rpow_sub ENNReal.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
#align ennreal.rpow_neg_one ENNReal.rpow_neg_one
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
cases' x with x
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
· by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
· have : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_mul]
#align ennreal.rpow_mul ENNReal.rpow_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases x
· cases n <;> simp [top_rpow_of_pos (Nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (Nat.succ_pos _)]
· simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (Nat.cast_nonneg n)]
#align ennreal.rpow_nat_cast ENNReal.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
#align ennreal.rpow_two ENNReal.rpow_two
theorem mul_rpow_eq_ite (x y : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = if (x = 0 ∧ y = ⊤ ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y = 0) ∧ z < 0 then ⊤ else x ^ z * y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz); · simp
replace hz := hz.lt_or_lt
wlog hxy : x ≤ y
· convert this y x z hz (le_of_not_le hxy) using 2 <;> simp only [mul_comm, and_comm, or_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx0)
· induction y <;> cases' hz with hz hz <;> simp [*, hz.not_lt]
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy0)
· exact (hx0 (bot_unique hxy)).elim
induction x
· cases' hz with hz hz <;> simp [hz, top_unique hxy]
induction y
· rw [ne_eq, coe_eq_zero] at hx0
cases' hz with hz hz <;> simp [*]
simp only [*, false_and_iff, and_false_iff, false_or_iff, if_false]
norm_cast at *
rw [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero hx0 hy0), NNReal.mul_rpow]
norm_cast
#align ennreal.mul_rpow_eq_ite ENNReal.mul_rpow_eq_ite
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
#align ennreal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) * y) ^ z = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z * (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z :=
mul_rpow_of_ne_top coe_ne_top coe_ne_top z
#align ennreal.coe_mul_rpow ENNReal.coe_mul_rpow
theorem prod_coe_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r = ((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r := by
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← coe_mul_rpow, coe_mul]
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
#align ennreal.mul_rpow_of_ne_zero ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_zero
theorem mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
simp [hz.not_lt, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
#align ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem prod_rpow_of_ne_top {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| @insert i s hi ih =>
have h2f : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞ := fun i hi ↦ hf i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi
rw [prod_insert hi, prod_insert hi, ih h2f, ← mul_rpow_of_ne_top <| hf i <| mem_insert_self ..]
apply prod_lt_top h2f |>.ne
theorem prod_rpow_of_nonneg {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hr]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy); · simp only [rpow_zero, inv_one]
replace hy := hy.lt_or_lt
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h0); · cases hy <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne x ⊤ with (rfl | h_top); · cases hy <;> simp [*]
apply ENNReal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
rw [← mul_rpow_of_ne_zero (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 h_top) h0, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0 h_top,
one_rpow]
#align ennreal.inv_rpow ENNReal.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hz, inv_rpow, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align ennreal.div_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.div_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ z := by
intro x y hxy
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hxy
rcases eq_or_ne y ∞ with (rfl | hy)
· simp only [top_rpow_of_pos h, coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h.le, coe_lt_top]
· lift y to ℝ≥0 using hy
simp only [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h.le, NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow (coe_lt_coe.1 hxy) h, coe_lt_coe]
#align ennreal.strict_mono_rpow_of_pos ENNReal.strictMono_rpow_of_pos
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
#align ennreal.monotone_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.monotone_rpow_of_nonneg
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
#align ennreal.order_iso_rpow ENNReal.orderIsoRpow
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_apply (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]
rfl
#align ennreal.order_iso_rpow_symm_apply ENNReal.orderIsoRpow_symm_apply
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
monotone_rpow_of_nonneg h₂ h₁
#align ennreal.rpow_le_rpow ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
strictMono_rpow_of_pos h₂ h₁
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hz).le_iff_le
#align ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_iff ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hz).lt_iff_lt
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow_iff ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem le_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← rpow_one x]
nth_rw 1 [← @_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z hz.ne']
rw [rpow_mul, ← one_div, @rpow_le_rpow_iff _ _ (1 / z) (by simp [hz])]
#align ennreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff
theorem lt_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z < y := by
nth_rw 1 [← rpow_one x]
nth_rw 1 [← @_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z (ne_of_lt hz).symm]
rw [rpow_mul, ← one_div, @rpow_lt_rpow_iff _ _ (1 / z) (by simp [hz])]
#align ennreal.lt_rpow_one_div_iff ENNReal.lt_rpow_one_div_iff
theorem rpow_one_div_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ (1 / z) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
nth_rw 1 [← ENNReal.rpow_one y]
nth_rw 2 [← @_root_.mul_inv_cancel _ _ z hz.ne.symm]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← one_div, ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.2 hz)]
#align ennreal.rpow_one_div_le_iff ENNReal.rpow_one_div_le_iff
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hx' : x ≠ ⊤) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx'
rw [one_lt_coe_iff] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz]
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
cases x
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_refl] <;>
linarith
· simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz]
#align ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx1 le_top)
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff, coe_pos] at hx0 hx1
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx0), NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz]
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y z : ℝ} (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx1 coe_lt_top)
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, h, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_refl] <;>
linarith
· rw [coe_le_one_iff] at hx1
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h,
NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h) hx1 hyz]
#align ennreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
nth_rw 2 [← ENNReal.rpow_one x]
exact ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx h_one_le
#align ennreal.rpow_le_self_of_le_one ENNReal.rpow_le_self_of_le_one
theorem le_rpow_self_of_one_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ≤ x ^ z := by
nth_rw 1 [← ENNReal.rpow_one x]
exact ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx h_one_le
#align ennreal.le_rpow_self_of_one_le ENNReal.le_rpow_self_of_one_le
theorem rpow_pos_of_nonneg {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) : 0 < x ^ p := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp [hp_zero, zero_lt_one]
· rw [← Ne] at hp_zero
have hp_pos := lt_of_le_of_ne hp_nonneg hp_zero.symm
rw [← zero_rpow_of_pos hp_pos]
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
#align ennreal.rpow_pos_of_nonneg ENNReal.rpow_pos_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx_ne_top : x ≠ ⊤) : 0 < x ^ p := by
cases' lt_or_le 0 p with hp_pos hp_nonpos
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hx_pos (le_of_lt hp_pos)
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, ENNReal.inv_pos]
exact rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (Right.nonneg_neg_iff.mpr hp_nonpos) hx_ne_top
#align ennreal.rpow_pos ENNReal.rpow_pos
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx le_top)
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), NNReal.rpow_lt_one hx hz]
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_one ENNReal.rpow_lt_one
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx coe_lt_top)
simp only [coe_le_one_iff] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hz, NNReal.rpow_le_one hx hz]
#align ennreal.rpow_le_one ENNReal.rpow_le_one
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 := by
cases x
· simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, zero_lt_one]
· simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)),
NNReal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz]
#align ennreal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg ENNReal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
cases x
· simp [top_rpow_of_neg hz, zero_lt_one]
· simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)),
NNReal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx (le_of_lt hz)]
#align ennreal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_neg ENNReal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_neg
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z := by
cases x
· simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz]
· simp only [some_eq_coe, one_lt_coe_iff] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), NNReal.one_lt_rpow hx hz]
#align ennreal.one_lt_rpow ENNReal.one_lt_rpow
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z := by
cases x
· simp [top_rpow_of_pos hz]
· simp only [one_le_coe_iff, some_eq_coe] at hx
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt hz), NNReal.one_le_rpow hx (le_of_lt hz)]
#align ennreal.one_le_rpow ENNReal.one_le_rpow
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hx2 le_top)
simp only [coe_lt_one_iff, coe_pos] at hx1 hx2 ⊢
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1), NNReal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz]
#align ennreal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg ENNReal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z := by
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hx2 coe_lt_top)
simp only [coe_le_one_iff, coe_pos] at hx1 hx2 ⊢
simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hx1),
NNReal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 (le_of_lt hz)]
#align ennreal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_neg ENNReal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_neg
theorem toNNReal_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) : x.toNNReal ^ z = (x ^ z).toNNReal := by
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (H | H | H)
· cases' x with x
· simp [H, ne_of_lt]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx, H, ne_of_lt]
· simp [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx]
· simp [H]
· cases x
· simp [H, ne_of_gt]
simp [coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (le_of_lt H)]
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_rpow ENNReal.toNNReal_rpow
theorem toReal_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) : x.toReal ^ z = (x ^ z).toReal := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal, ENNReal.toReal, ← NNReal.coe_rpow, ENNReal.toNNReal_rpow]
#align ennreal.to_real_rpow ENNReal.toReal_rpow
theorem ofReal_rpow_of_pos {x p : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) :
ENNReal.ofReal x ^ p = ENNReal.ofReal (x ^ p) := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.ofReal]
rw [coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg hx_pos.le]
simp [hx_pos]
#align ennreal.of_real_rpow_of_pos ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 879 | 888 | theorem ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x p : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) (hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal x ^ p = ENNReal.ofReal (x ^ p) := by |
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [← Ne] at hp0
have hp_pos : 0 < p := lt_of_le_of_ne hp_nonneg hp0.symm
simp [hx0, hp_pos, hp_pos.ne.symm]
rw [← Ne] at hx0
exact ofReal_rpow_of_pos (hx_nonneg.lt_of_ne hx0.symm)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
#align_import algebra.gcd_monoid.finset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
#align_import algebra.gcd_monoid.div from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b537794f8409bc9598febb79cd510b1df5f4539d"
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
section lcm
def lcm (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.lcm 1 f
#align finset.lcm Finset.lcm
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm :=
rfl
#align finset.lcm_def Finset.lcm_def
@[simp]
theorem lcm_empty : (∅ : Finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
#align finset.lcm_empty Finset.lcm_empty
@[simp]
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.lcm_dvd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
#align finset.lcm_dvd_iff Finset.lcm_dvd_iff
theorem lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2
#align finset.lcm_dvd Finset.lcm_dvd
theorem dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
#align finset.dvd_lcm Finset.dvd_lcm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Finset.lean | 77 | 82 | theorem lcm_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (f b) (s.lcm f) := by |
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(lcm_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.lcm f) (Multiset.normalize_lcm (s.1.map f))).2 (dvd_lcm h)]
apply fold_insert h
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
#align_import field_theory.ratfunc from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf9bbbcf0c1c1ead18280b0d010e417b10abb1b6"
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
#align ratfunc.zero RatFunc.zero
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
-- Porting note: added `OfNat.ofNat`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [zero_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by
simp only [Zero.zero, OfNat.ofNat, RatFunc.zero]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_zero RatFunc.ofFractionRing_zero
protected irreducible_def add : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p + q⟩
#align ratfunc.add RatFunc.add
instance : Add (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.add⟩
-- Porting note: added `HAdd.hAdd`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [add_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_add (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p + q) = ofFractionRing p + ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add, RatFunc.add]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_add RatFunc.ofFractionRing_add
protected irreducible_def sub : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p - q⟩
#align ratfunc.sub RatFunc.sub
instance : Sub (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.sub⟩
-- Porting note: added `HSub.hSub`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [sub_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_sub (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p - q) = ofFractionRing p - ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [Sub.sub, HSub.hSub, RatFunc.sub]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_sub RatFunc.ofFractionRing_sub
protected irreducible_def neg : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨-p⟩
#align ratfunc.neg RatFunc.neg
instance : Neg (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.neg⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_neg (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (-p) = -ofFractionRing p := by simp only [Neg.neg, RatFunc.neg]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_neg RatFunc.ofFractionRing_neg
protected irreducible_def one : RatFunc K :=
⟨1⟩
#align ratfunc.one RatFunc.one
instance : One (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.one⟩
-- Porting note: added `OfNat.ofNat`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [one_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_one : (ofFractionRing 1 : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
simp only [One.one, OfNat.ofNat, RatFunc.one]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_one RatFunc.ofFractionRing_one
protected irreducible_def mul : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p * q⟩
#align ratfunc.mul RatFunc.mul
instance : Mul (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.mul⟩
-- Porting note: added `HMul.hMul`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [mul_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_mul (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p * q) = ofFractionRing p * ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [Mul.mul, HMul.hMul, RatFunc.mul]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_mul RatFunc.ofFractionRing_mul
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
protected irreducible_def div : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p / q⟩
#align ratfunc.div RatFunc.div
instance : Div (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.div⟩
-- Porting note: added `HDiv.hDiv`. using `simp?` produces `simp only [div_def]`
-- that does not close the goal
theorem ofFractionRing_div (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p / q) = ofFractionRing p / ofFractionRing q := by
simp only [Div.div, HDiv.hDiv, RatFunc.div]
#align ratfunc.of_fraction_ring_div RatFunc.ofFractionRing_div
protected irreducible_def inv : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p⁻¹⟩
#align ratfunc.inv RatFunc.inv
instance : Inv (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.inv⟩
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 177 | 179 | theorem ofFractionRing_inv (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing p⁻¹ = (ofFractionRing p)⁻¹ := by |
simp only [Inv.inv, RatFunc.inv]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
#align_import algebra.homology.augment from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits HomologicalComplex
universe v u
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V]
namespace CochainComplex
@[simps]
def truncate [HasZeroMorphisms V] : CochainComplex V ℕ ⥤ CochainComplex V ℕ where
obj C :=
{ X := fun i => C.X (i + 1)
d := fun i j => C.d (i + 1) (j + 1)
shape := fun i j w => by
apply C.shape
simpa }
map f := { f := fun i => f.f (i + 1) }
#align cochain_complex.truncate CochainComplex.truncate
def toTruncate [HasZeroObject V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) :
(single₀ V).obj (C.X 0) ⟶ truncate.obj C :=
(fromSingle₀Equiv (truncate.obj C) (C.X 0)).symm ⟨C.d 0 1, by aesop⟩
#align cochain_complex.to_truncate CochainComplex.toTruncate
variable [HasZeroMorphisms V]
def augment (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
CochainComplex V ℕ where
X | 0 => X
| i + 1 => C.X i
d | 0, 1 => f
| i + 1, j + 1 => C.d i j
| _, _ => 0
shape i j s := by
simp? at s says simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel] at s
rcases j with (_ | _ | j) <;> cases i <;> try simp
· contradiction
· rw [C.shape]
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel]
contrapose! s
rw [← s]
d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk := by
rcases k with (_ | _ | k) <;> rcases j with (_ | _ | j) <;> cases i <;> try simp
cases k
· exact w
· rw [C.shape, comp_zero]
simp only [Nat.zero_eq, ComplexShape.up_Rel, zero_add]
exact (Nat.one_lt_succ_succ _).ne
#align cochain_complex.augment CochainComplex.augment
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_zero (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
(augment C f w).X 0 = X :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cochain_complex.augment_X_zero CochainComplex.augment_X_zero
@[simp]
theorem augment_X_succ (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0)
(i : ℕ) : (augment C f w).X (i + 1) = C.X i :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cochain_complex.augment_X_succ CochainComplex.augment_X_succ
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_zero_one (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
(augment C f w).d 0 1 = f :=
rfl
#align cochain_complex.augment_d_zero_one CochainComplex.augment_d_zero_one
@[simp]
theorem augment_d_succ_succ (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0)
(i j : ℕ) : (augment C f w).d (i + 1) (j + 1) = C.d i j :=
rfl
#align cochain_complex.augment_d_succ_succ CochainComplex.augment_d_succ_succ
def truncateAugment (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0) (w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) :
truncate.obj (augment C f w) ≅ C where
hom := { f := fun i => 𝟙 _ }
inv :=
{ f := fun i => 𝟙 _
comm' := fun i j => by
cases j <;>
· dsimp
simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
cases i <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align cochain_complex.truncate_augment CochainComplex.truncateAugment
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_hom_f (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0)
(w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) (i : ℕ) : (truncateAugment C f w).hom.f i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
#align cochain_complex.truncate_augment_hom_f CochainComplex.truncateAugment_hom_f
@[simp]
theorem truncateAugment_inv_f (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) {X : V} (f : X ⟶ C.X 0)
(w : f ≫ C.d 0 1 = 0) (i : ℕ) :
(truncateAugment C f w).inv.f i = 𝟙 ((truncate.obj (augment C f w)).X i) :=
rfl
#align cochain_complex.truncate_augment_inv_f CochainComplex.truncateAugment_inv_f
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Augment.lean | 325 | 328 | theorem cochainComplex_d_succ_succ_zero (C : CochainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) : C.d 0 (i + 2) = 0 := by |
rw [C.shape]
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel, zero_add]
exact (Nat.one_lt_succ_succ _).ne
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.PrimitiveRoots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Discriminant
#align_import number_theory.cyclotomic.discriminant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
universe u v
open Algebra Polynomial Nat IsPrimitiveRoot PowerBasis
open scoped Polynomial Cyclotomic
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} {L : Type v} {ζ : L} [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra K L]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} K L] [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hirr : Irreducible (cyclotomic (↑(p ^ (k + 1)) : ℕ) K))
(hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) : discr K (hζ.powerBasis K).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
haveI hne := IsCyclotomicExtension.neZero' (p ^ (k + 1)) K L
-- Porting note: these two instances are not automatically synthesised and must be constructed
haveI mf : Module.Finite K L := finiteDimensional {p ^ (k + 1)} K L
haveI se : IsSeparable K L := (isGalois (p ^ (k + 1)) K L).to_isSeparable
rw [discr_powerBasis_eq_norm, finrank L hirr, hζ.powerBasis_gen _, ←
hζ.minpoly_eq_cyclotomic_of_irreducible hirr, PNat.pow_coe,
totient_prime_pow hp.out (succ_pos k), Nat.add_one_sub_one]
have coe_two : ((2 : ℕ+) : ℕ) = 2 := rfl
have hp2 : p = 2 → k ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl rfl
exact absurd rfl hk
congr 1
· rcases eq_or_ne p 2 with (rfl | hp2)
· rcases Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (hp2 rfl) with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [coe_two, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, mul_one]; simp only [_root_.pow_succ']
rw [mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ zero_lt_two, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ zero_lt_two]
cases k
· simp
· simp_rw [_root_.pow_succ', (even_two.mul_right _).neg_one_pow,
((even_two.mul_right _).mul_right _).neg_one_pow]
· replace hp2 : (p : ℕ) ≠ 2 := by rwa [Ne, ← coe_two, PNat.coe_inj]
have hpo : Odd (p : ℕ) := hp.out.odd_of_ne_two hp2
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := (hp.out.even_sub_one hp2).two_dvd
rw [ha, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ two_pos,
Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ two_pos, mul_right_comm, pow_mul, (hpo.pow.mul _).neg_one_pow,
pow_mul, hpo.pow.neg_one_pow]
refine Nat.Even.sub_odd ?_ (even_two_mul _) odd_one
rw [mul_left_comm, ← ha]
exact one_le_mul (one_le_pow _ _ hp.1.pos) (succ_le_iff.2 <| tsub_pos_of_lt hp.1.one_lt)
· have H := congr_arg (@derivative K _) (cyclotomic_prime_pow_mul_X_pow_sub_one K p k)
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_sub, derivative_one, sub_zero, derivative_X_pow, C_eq_natCast,
derivative_sub, derivative_one, sub_zero, derivative_X_pow, C_eq_natCast, ← PNat.pow_coe,
hζ.minpoly_eq_cyclotomic_of_irreducible hirr] at H
replace H := congr_arg (fun P => aeval ζ P) H
simp only [aeval_add, aeval_mul, minpoly.aeval, zero_mul, add_zero, aeval_natCast,
_root_.map_sub, aeval_one, aeval_X_pow] at H
replace H := congr_arg (Algebra.norm K) H
have hnorm : (norm K) (ζ ^ (p : ℕ) ^ k - 1) = (p : K) ^ (p : ℕ) ^ k := by
by_cases hp : p = 2
· exact mod_cast hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_eq_prime_pow_of_ne_zero hirr le_rfl (hp2 hp)
· exact mod_cast hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hirr le_rfl hp
rw [MonoidHom.map_mul, hnorm, MonoidHom.map_mul, ← map_natCast (algebraMap K L),
Algebra.norm_algebraMap, finrank L hirr] at H
conv_rhs at H => -- Porting note: need to drill down to successfully rewrite the totient
enter [1, 2]
rw [PNat.pow_coe, ← succ_eq_add_one, totient_prime_pow hp.out (succ_pos k), Nat.sub_one,
Nat.pred_succ]
rw [← hζ.minpoly_eq_cyclotomic_of_irreducible hirr, map_pow, hζ.norm_eq_one hk hirr, one_pow,
mul_one, PNat.pow_coe, cast_pow, ← pow_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm (k + 1), mul_assoc] at H
have := mul_pos (succ_pos k) (tsub_pos_of_lt hp.out.one_lt)
rw [← succ_pred_eq_of_pos this, mul_succ, pow_add _ _ ((p : ℕ) ^ k)] at H
replace H := (mul_left_inj' fun h => ?_).1 H
· simp only [H, mul_comm _ (k + 1)]; norm_cast
· -- Porting note: was `replace h := pow_eq_zero h; rw [coe_coe] at h; simpa using hne.1`
have := hne.1
rw [PNat.pow_coe, Nat.cast_pow, Ne, pow_eq_zero_iff (by omega)] at this
exact absurd (pow_eq_zero h) this
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.discr_prime_pow_ne_two IsCyclotomicExtension.discr_prime_pow_ne_two
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} K L] [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hirr : Irreducible (cyclotomic (↑(p ^ (k + 1)) : ℕ) K))
(hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) : discr K (hζ.powerBasis K).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * (p - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
simpa [totient_prime_pow hp.out (succ_pos k)] using discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ hirr hk
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.discr_prime_pow_ne_two' IsCyclotomicExtension.discr_prime_pow_ne_two'
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
theorem discr_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L] [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) (hirr : Irreducible (cyclotomic (↑(p ^ k) : ℕ) K)) :
discr K (hζ.powerBasis K).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
cases' k with k k
· simp only [coe_basis, _root_.pow_zero, powerBasis_gen _ hζ, totient_one, mul_zero, mul_one,
show 1 / 2 = 0 by rfl, discr, traceMatrix]
have hζone : ζ = 1 := by simpa using hζ
rw [hζ.powerBasis_dim _, hζone, ← (algebraMap K L).map_one,
minpoly.eq_X_sub_C_of_algebraMap_inj _ (algebraMap K L).injective, natDegree_X_sub_C]
simp only [traceMatrix, map_one, one_pow, Matrix.det_unique, traceForm_apply, mul_one]
rw [← (algebraMap K L).map_one, trace_algebraMap, finrank _ hirr]
norm_num
· by_cases hk : p ^ (k + 1) = 2
· have coe_two : 2 = ((2 : ℕ+) : ℕ) := rfl
have hp : p = 2 := by
rw [← PNat.coe_inj, PNat.pow_coe, ← pow_one 2] at hk
replace hk :=
eq_of_prime_pow_eq (prime_iff.1 hp.out) (prime_iff.1 Nat.prime_two) (succ_pos _) hk
rwa [coe_two, PNat.coe_inj] at hk
subst hp
rw [← PNat.coe_inj, PNat.pow_coe] at hk
nth_rw 2 [← pow_one 2] at hk
replace hk := Nat.pow_right_injective rfl.le hk
rw [add_left_eq_self] at hk
subst hk
rw [pow_one] at hζ hcycl
have : natDegree (minpoly K ζ) = 1 := by
rw [hζ.eq_neg_one_of_two_right, show (-1 : L) = algebraMap K L (-1) by simp,
minpoly.eq_X_sub_C_of_algebraMap_inj _ (NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective K L)]
exact natDegree_X_sub_C (-1)
rcases Fin.equiv_iff_eq.2 this with ⟨e⟩
rw [← Algebra.discr_reindex K (hζ.powerBasis K).basis e, coe_basis, powerBasis_gen]; norm_num
simp_rw [hζ.eq_neg_one_of_two_right, show (-1 : L) = algebraMap K L (-1) by simp]
convert_to (discr K fun i : Fin 1 ↦ (algebraMap K L) (-1) ^ ↑i) = _
· congr
ext i
simp only [map_neg, map_one, Function.comp_apply, Fin.coe_fin_one, _root_.pow_zero]
suffices (e.symm i : ℕ) = 0 by simp [this]
rw [← Nat.lt_one_iff]
convert (e.symm i).2
rw [this]
· simp only [discr, traceMatrix_apply, Matrix.det_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, Fin.val_zero,
_root_.pow_zero, traceForm_apply, mul_one]
rw [← (algebraMap K L).map_one, trace_algebraMap, finrank _ hirr]; norm_num
· exact discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ hirr hk
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.discr_prime_pow IsCyclotomicExtension.discr_prime_pow
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L]
[hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k))
(hirr : Irreducible (cyclotomic (↑(p ^ k) : ℕ) K)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr K (hζ.powerBasis K).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [discr_prime_pow hζ hirr]
by_cases heven : Even ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2)
· exact ⟨1, (p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1), by rw [heven.neg_one_pow]; norm_num⟩
· exact ⟨-1, (p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1), by
rw [(odd_iff_not_even.2 heven).neg_one_pow]; norm_num⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow IsCyclotomicExtension.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Discriminant.lean | 207 | 216 | theorem discr_odd_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} K L] [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hirr : Irreducible (cyclotomic p K)) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr K (hζ.powerBasis K).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by |
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} K L := by
rw [zero_add, pow_one]
infer_instance
have hζ' : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1) :) := by simpa using hζ
convert discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ' (by simpa [hirr]) (by simp [hodd]) using 2
· rw [zero_add, pow_one, totient_prime hp.out]
· rw [_root_.pow_zero, one_mul, zero_add, mul_one, Nat.sub_sub]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Unique
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.condexp_L2 from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E E' F G G' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- E for an inner product space
[NormedAddCommGroup E]
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [CompleteSpace E]
-- E' for an inner product space on which we compute integrals
[NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] [CompleteSpace E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- G for a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G]
-- G' for integrals on a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedSpace ℝ G'] [CompleteSpace G']
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫₂" => @inner 𝕜 (α →₂[μ] E) _ x y
-- Porting note: the argument `E` of `condexpL2` is not automatically filled in Lean 4.
-- To avoid typing `(E := _)` every time it is made explicit.
variable (E 𝕜)
noncomputable def condexpL2 (hm : m ≤ m0) : (α →₂[μ] E) →L[𝕜] lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ :=
@orthogonalProjection 𝕜 (α →₂[μ] E) _ _ _ (lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ)
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
inferInstance
#align measure_theory.condexp_L2 MeasureTheory.condexpL2
variable {E 𝕜}
theorem aeStronglyMeasurable'_condexpL2 (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' (β := E) m (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) μ :=
lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' _
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'_condexp_L2 MeasureTheory.aeStronglyMeasurable'_condexpL2
theorem integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top (hm : m ≤ m0) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
IntegrableOn (E := E) (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) s μ :=
integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E) fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim
hμs
#align measure_theory.integrable_on_condexp_L2_of_measure_ne_top MeasureTheory.integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top
theorem integrable_condexpL2_of_isFiniteMeasure (hm : m ≤ m0) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →₂[μ] E} :
Integrable (β := E) (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) μ :=
integrableOn_univ.mp <| integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm (measure_ne_top _ _) f
#align measure_theory.integrable_condexp_L2_of_is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_condexpL2_of_isFiniteMeasure
theorem norm_condexpL2_le_one (hm : m ≤ m0) : ‖@condexpL2 α E 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ _ μ hm‖ ≤ 1 :=
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
orthogonalProjection_norm_le _
#align measure_theory.norm_condexp_L2_le_one MeasureTheory.norm_condexpL2_le_one
theorem norm_condexpL2_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) : ‖condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
((@condexpL2 _ E 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ _ μ hm).le_opNorm f).trans
(mul_le_of_le_one_left (norm_nonneg _) (norm_condexpL2_le_one hm))
#align measure_theory.norm_condexp_L2_le MeasureTheory.norm_condexpL2_le
theorem snorm_condexpL2_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
snorm (F := E) (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f) 2 μ ≤ snorm f 2 μ := by
rw [lpMeas_coe, ← ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _) (Lp.snorm_ne_top _), ←
Lp.norm_def, ← Lp.norm_def, Submodule.norm_coe]
exact norm_condexpL2_le hm f
#align measure_theory.snorm_condexp_L2_le MeasureTheory.snorm_condexpL2_le
theorem norm_condexpL2_coe_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
‖(condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, Lp.norm_def, ← lpMeas_coe]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ?_ (Lp.snorm_ne_top _)).mpr (snorm_condexpL2_le hm f)
exact Lp.snorm_ne_top _
#align measure_theory.norm_condexp_L2_coe_le MeasureTheory.norm_condexpL2_coe_le
theorem inner_condexpL2_left_eq_right (hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : α →₂[μ] E} :
⟪(condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E), g⟫₂ = ⟪f, (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm g : α →₂[μ] E)⟫₂ :=
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right _ f g
#align measure_theory.inner_condexp_L2_left_eq_right MeasureTheory.inner_condexpL2_left_eq_right
theorem condexpL2_indicator_of_measurable (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(c : E) :
(condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c) : α →₂[μ] E) =
indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c := by
rw [condexpL2]
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
have h_mem : indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c ∈ lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ :=
mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp hm hs hμs
let ind := (⟨indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c, h_mem⟩ : lpMeas E 𝕜 m 2 μ)
have h_coe_ind : (ind : α →₂[μ] E) = indicatorConstLp 2 (hm s hs) hμs c := rfl
have h_orth_mem := orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self ind
rw [← h_coe_ind, h_orth_mem]
#align measure_theory.condexp_L2_indicator_of_measurable MeasureTheory.condexpL2_indicator_of_measurable
theorem inner_condexpL2_eq_inner_fun (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : α →₂[μ] E)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) :
⟪(condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E), g⟫₂ = ⟪f, g⟫₂ := by
symm
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← inner_sub_left, condexpL2]
simp only [mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mpr hg, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero f g]
#align measure_theory.inner_condexp_L2_eq_inner_fun MeasureTheory.inner_condexpL2_eq_inner_fun
theorem condexpL2_const_inner (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp E 2 μ) (c : E) :
condexpL2 𝕜 𝕜 hm (((Lp.memℒp f).const_inner c).toLp fun a => ⟪c, f a⟫) =ᵐ[μ]
fun a => ⟪c, (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) a⟫ := by
rw [lpMeas_coe]
have h_mem_Lp : Memℒp (fun a => ⟪c, (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) a⟫) 2 μ := by
refine Memℒp.const_inner _ ?_; rw [lpMeas_coe]; exact Lp.memℒp _
have h_eq : h_mem_Lp.toLp _ =ᵐ[μ] fun a => ⟪c, (condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f : α → E) a⟫ :=
h_mem_Lp.coeFn_toLp
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ h_eq
refine Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq' 𝕜 hm _ _ two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(fun s _ hμs => integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs.ne _) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro s _ hμs
rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr (ae_restrict_of_ae h_eq)]
exact (integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs.ne _).const_inner _
· intro s hs hμs
rw [← lpMeas_coe, integral_condexpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real _ hs hμs.ne,
integral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae h_eq), lpMeas_coe, ←
L2.inner_indicatorConstLp_eq_setIntegral_inner 𝕜 (↑(condexpL2 E 𝕜 hm f)) (hm s hs) c hμs.ne,
← inner_condexpL2_left_eq_right, condexpL2_indicator_of_measurable _ hs,
L2.inner_indicatorConstLp_eq_setIntegral_inner 𝕜 f (hm s hs) c hμs.ne,
setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs)
((Memℒp.coeFn_toLp ((Lp.memℒp f).const_inner c)).mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
· rw [← lpMeas_coe]; exact lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' _
· refine AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr ?_ h_eq.symm
exact (lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' _).const_inner _
#align measure_theory.condexp_L2_const_inner MeasureTheory.condexpL2_const_inner
theorem integral_condexpL2_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp E' 2 μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ∫ x in s, (condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f : α → E') x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, lpMeas_coe, ←
integral_sub' (integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs)
(integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs)]
refine integral_eq_zero_of_forall_integral_inner_eq_zero 𝕜 _ ?_ ?_
· rw [integrable_congr (ae_restrict_of_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub (↑(condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f)) f).symm)]
exact integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs
intro c
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, inner_sub_right]
rw [integral_sub
((integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs).const_inner c)
((integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs).const_inner c)]
have h_ae_eq_f := Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (E := 𝕜) ((Lp.memℒp f).const_inner c)
rw [← lpMeas_coe, sub_eq_zero, ←
setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) ((condexpL2_const_inner hm f c).mono fun x hx _ => hx), ←
setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) (h_ae_eq_f.mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
exact integral_condexpL2_eq_of_fin_meas_real _ hs hμs
#align measure_theory.integral_condexp_L2_eq MeasureTheory.integral_condexpL2_eq
variable {E'' 𝕜' : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜'] [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜' E'']
[CompleteSpace E''] [NormedSpace ℝ E'']
variable (𝕜 𝕜')
theorem condexpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap (hm : m ≤ m0) (T : E' →L[ℝ] E'') (f : α →₂[μ] E') :
(condexpL2 E'' 𝕜' hm (T.compLp f) : α →₂[μ] E'') =ᵐ[μ]
T.compLp (condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E') := by
refine Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq' 𝕜' hm _ _ two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(fun s _ hμs => integrableOn_condexpL2_of_measure_ne_top hm hμs.ne _) (fun s _ hμs =>
integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs.ne) ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
rw [T.setIntegral_compLp _ (hm s hs),
T.integral_comp_comm
(integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top _ fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs.ne),
← lpMeas_coe, ← lpMeas_coe, integral_condexpL2_eq hm f hs hμs.ne,
integral_condexpL2_eq hm (T.compLp f) hs hμs.ne, T.setIntegral_compLp _ (hm s hs),
T.integral_comp_comm
(integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top f fact_one_le_two_ennreal.elim hμs.ne)]
· rw [← lpMeas_coe]; exact lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' _
· have h_coe := T.coeFn_compLp (condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f : α →₂[μ] E')
rw [← EventuallyEq] at h_coe
refine AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr ?_ h_coe.symm
exact (lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' (condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm f)).continuous_comp T.continuous
#align measure_theory.condexp_L2_comp_continuous_linear_map MeasureTheory.condexpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 𝕜'}
section CondexpL2Indicator
variable (𝕜)
theorem condexpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : E') :
condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) =ᵐ[μ] fun a =>
(condexpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ)) : α → ℝ) a • x := by
rw [indicatorConstLp_eq_toSpanSingleton_compLp hs hμs x]
have h_comp :=
condexpL2_comp_continuousLinearMap ℝ 𝕜 hm (toSpanSingleton ℝ x)
(indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ))
rw [← lpMeas_coe] at h_comp
refine h_comp.trans ?_
exact (toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLp _
#align measure_theory.condexp_L2_indicator_ae_eq_smul MeasureTheory.condexpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul
theorem condexpL2_indicator_eq_toSpanSingleton_comp (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E') : (condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α →₂[μ] E') =
(toSpanSingleton ℝ x).compLp (condexpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1)) := by
ext1
rw [← lpMeas_coe]
refine (condexpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul 𝕜 hm hs hμs x).trans ?_
have h_comp := (toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLp
(condexpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α →₂[μ] ℝ)
rw [← EventuallyEq] at h_comp
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ h_comp.symm
filter_upwards with y using rfl
#align measure_theory.condexp_L2_indicator_eq_to_span_singleton_comp MeasureTheory.condexpL2_indicator_eq_toSpanSingleton_comp
variable {𝕜}
theorem set_lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E') {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet[m] t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α → E') a‖₊ ∂μ ≤
μ (s ∩ t) * ‖x‖₊ :=
calc
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α → E') a‖₊ ∂μ =
∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condexpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a • x‖₊ ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_congr_fun (hm t ht)
((condexpL2_indicator_ae_eq_smul 𝕜 hm hs hμs x).mono fun a ha _ => by rw [ha])
_ = (∫⁻ a in t, ‖(condexpL2 ℝ ℝ hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs 1) : α → ℝ) a‖₊ ∂μ) * ‖x‖₊ := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_smul, ENNReal.coe_mul]
rw [lintegral_mul_const, lpMeas_coe]
exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).ennnorm
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) * ‖x‖₊ :=
mul_le_mul_right' (lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le_real hs hμs ht hμt) _
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_nnnorm_condexp_L2_indicator_le MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le (hm : m ≤ m0) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : E') [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
∫⁻ a, ‖(condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x) : α → E') a‖₊ ∂μ ≤ μ s * ‖x‖₊ := by
refine lintegral_le_of_forall_fin_meas_le' hm (μ s * ‖x‖₊) ?_ fun t ht hμt => ?_
· rw [lpMeas_coe]
exact (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _).ennnorm
refine (set_lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le hm hs hμs x ht hμt).trans ?_
gcongr
apply Set.inter_subset_left
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_condexp_L2_indicator_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/CondexpL2.lean | 367 | 376 | theorem integrable_condexpL2_indicator (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E') :
Integrable (β := E') (condexpL2 E' 𝕜 hm (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x)) μ := by |
refine integrable_of_forall_fin_meas_le' hm (μ s * ‖x‖₊)
(ENNReal.mul_lt_top hμs ENNReal.coe_ne_top) ?_ ?_
· rw [lpMeas_coe]; exact Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _
· refine fun t ht hμt =>
(set_lintegral_nnnorm_condexpL2_indicator_le hm hs hμs x ht hμt).trans ?_
gcongr
apply Set.inter_subset_left
|
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
#align_import data.pnat.xgcd from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6afc9b06856ad973f6a2619e3e8a0a8d537a58f2"
open Nat
namespace PNat
structure XgcdType where
wp : ℕ
x : ℕ
y : ℕ
zp : ℕ
ap : ℕ
bp : ℕ
deriving Inhabited
#align pnat.xgcd_type PNat.XgcdType
namespace XgcdType
variable (u : XgcdType)
instance : SizeOf XgcdType :=
⟨fun u => u.bp⟩
instance : Repr XgcdType where
reprPrec
| g, _ => s!"[[[{repr (g.wp + 1)}, {repr g.x}], \
[{repr g.y}, {repr (g.zp + 1)}]], \
[{repr (g.ap + 1)}, {repr (g.bp + 1)}]]"
def mk' (w : ℕ+) (x : ℕ) (y : ℕ) (z : ℕ+) (a : ℕ+) (b : ℕ+) : XgcdType :=
mk w.val.pred x y z.val.pred a.val.pred b.val.pred
#align pnat.xgcd_type.mk' PNat.XgcdType.mk'
def w : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.wp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.w PNat.XgcdType.w
def z : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.zp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.z PNat.XgcdType.z
def a : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.ap
#align pnat.xgcd_type.a PNat.XgcdType.a
def b : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.bp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.b PNat.XgcdType.b
def r : ℕ :=
(u.ap + 1) % (u.bp + 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.r PNat.XgcdType.r
def q : ℕ :=
(u.ap + 1) / (u.bp + 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.q PNat.XgcdType.q
def qp : ℕ :=
u.q - 1
#align pnat.xgcd_type.qp PNat.XgcdType.qp
def vp : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨u.wp + u.x + u.ap + u.wp * u.ap + u.x * u.bp, u.y + u.zp + u.bp + u.y * u.ap + u.zp * u.bp⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.vp PNat.XgcdType.vp
def v : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b, u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.v PNat.XgcdType.v
def succ₂ (t : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨t.1.succ, t.2.succ⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.succ₂ PNat.XgcdType.succ₂
theorem v_eq_succ_vp : u.v = succ₂ u.vp := by
ext <;> dsimp [v, vp, w, z, a, b, succ₂] <;> ring_nf
#align pnat.xgcd_type.v_eq_succ_vp PNat.XgcdType.v_eq_succ_vp
def IsSpecial : Prop :=
u.wp + u.zp + u.wp * u.zp = u.x * u.y
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_special PNat.XgcdType.IsSpecial
def IsSpecial' : Prop :=
u.w * u.z = succPNat (u.x * u.y)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_special' PNat.XgcdType.IsSpecial'
theorem isSpecial_iff : u.IsSpecial ↔ u.IsSpecial' := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, IsSpecial']
let ⟨wp, x, y, zp, ap, bp⟩ := u
constructor <;> intro h <;> simp [w, z, succPNat] at * <;>
simp only [← coe_inj, mul_coe, mk_coe] at *
· simp_all [← h, Nat.mul, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]; ring
· simp [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_mul, ← Nat.add_assoc] at h; rw [← h]; ring
-- Porting note: Old code has been removed as it was much more longer.
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_special_iff PNat.XgcdType.isSpecial_iff
def IsReduced : Prop :=
u.ap = u.bp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_reduced PNat.XgcdType.IsReduced
def IsReduced' : Prop :=
u.a = u.b
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_reduced' PNat.XgcdType.IsReduced'
theorem isReduced_iff : u.IsReduced ↔ u.IsReduced' :=
succPNat_inj.symm
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_reduced_iff PNat.XgcdType.isReduced_iff
def flip : XgcdType where
wp := u.zp
x := u.y
y := u.x
zp := u.wp
ap := u.bp
bp := u.ap
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip PNat.XgcdType.flip
@[simp]
theorem flip_w : (flip u).w = u.z :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_w PNat.XgcdType.flip_w
@[simp]
theorem flip_x : (flip u).x = u.y :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_x PNat.XgcdType.flip_x
@[simp]
theorem flip_y : (flip u).y = u.x :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_y PNat.XgcdType.flip_y
@[simp]
theorem flip_z : (flip u).z = u.w :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_z PNat.XgcdType.flip_z
@[simp]
theorem flip_a : (flip u).a = u.b :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_a PNat.XgcdType.flip_a
@[simp]
theorem flip_b : (flip u).b = u.a :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_b PNat.XgcdType.flip_b
theorem flip_isReduced : (flip u).IsReduced ↔ u.IsReduced := by
dsimp [IsReduced, flip]
constructor <;> intro h <;> exact h.symm
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_is_reduced PNat.XgcdType.flip_isReduced
theorem flip_isSpecial : (flip u).IsSpecial ↔ u.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, flip]
rw [mul_comm u.x, mul_comm u.zp, add_comm u.zp]
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_is_special PNat.XgcdType.flip_isSpecial
theorem flip_v : (flip u).v = u.v.swap := by
dsimp [v]
ext
· simp only
ring
· simp only
ring
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_v PNat.XgcdType.flip_v
theorem rq_eq : u.r + (u.bp + 1) * u.q = u.ap + 1 :=
Nat.mod_add_div (u.ap + 1) (u.bp + 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.rq_eq PNat.XgcdType.rq_eq
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Xgcd.lean | 241 | 246 | theorem qp_eq (hr : u.r = 0) : u.q = u.qp + 1 := by |
by_cases hq : u.q = 0
· let h := u.rq_eq
rw [hr, hq, mul_zero, add_zero] at h
cases h
· exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hq)).symm
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.ConjFinite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Dihedral
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
#align_import group_theory.commuting_probability from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Fintype
variable (M : Type*) [Mul M]
def commProb : ℚ :=
Nat.card { p : M × M // Commute p.1 p.2 } / (Nat.card M : ℚ) ^ 2
#align comm_prob commProb
theorem commProb_def :
commProb M = Nat.card { p : M × M // Commute p.1 p.2 } / (Nat.card M : ℚ) ^ 2 :=
rfl
#align comm_prob_def commProb_def
theorem commProb_prod (M' : Type*) [Mul M'] : commProb (M × M') = commProb M * commProb M' := by
simp_rw [commProb_def, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.card_prod, Nat.cast_mul, mul_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul,
← Nat.card_prod, Commute, SemiconjBy, Prod.ext_iff]
congr 2
exact Nat.card_congr ⟨fun x => ⟨⟨⟨x.1.1.1, x.1.2.1⟩, x.2.1⟩, ⟨⟨x.1.1.2, x.1.2.2⟩, x.2.2⟩⟩,
fun x => ⟨⟨⟨x.1.1.1, x.2.1.1⟩, ⟨x.1.1.2, x.2.1.2⟩⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩, fun x => rfl, fun x => rfl⟩
theorem commProb_pi {α : Type*} (i : α → Type*) [Fintype α] [∀ a, Mul (i a)] :
commProb (∀ a, i a) = ∏ a, commProb (i a) := by
simp_rw [commProb_def, Finset.prod_div_distrib, Finset.prod_pow, ← Nat.cast_prod,
← Nat.card_pi, Commute, SemiconjBy, Function.funext_iff]
congr 2
exact Nat.card_congr ⟨fun x a => ⟨⟨x.1.1 a, x.1.2 a⟩, x.2 a⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨fun a => (x a).1.1,
fun a => (x a).1.2⟩, fun a => (x a).2⟩, fun x => rfl, fun x => rfl⟩
theorem commProb_function {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Mul β] :
commProb (α → β) = (commProb β) ^ Fintype.card α := by
rw [commProb_pi, Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ]
@[simp]
theorem commProb_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite M] : commProb M = 0 :=
div_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl (Nat.cast_eq_zero.2 Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite))
variable [Finite M]
theorem commProb_pos [h : Nonempty M] : 0 < commProb M :=
h.elim fun x ↦
div_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Finite.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨⟨(x, x), rfl⟩⟩))
(pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr Finite.card_pos) 2)
#align comm_prob_pos commProb_pos
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CommutingProbability.lean | 78 | 81 | theorem commProb_le_one : commProb M ≤ 1 := by |
refine div_le_one_of_le ?_ (sq_nonneg (Nat.card M : ℚ))
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_le, sq, ← Nat.card_prod]
apply Finite.card_subtype_le
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
#align_import algebra.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime (0 : α) := fun h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align not_prime_zero not_prime_zero
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime (1 : α) := fun h => h.not_unit isUnit_one
#align not_prime_one not_prime_one
theorem Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{a b : α} : a ∣ p * b → p ∣ a ∨ a ∣ b := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
rcases hp.2.2 a c (hc ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _) with (h | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at hc
exact Or.inr (hc.symm ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ a) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
exact one_dvd b
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ih (dvd_trans (pow_dvd_pow p n.le_succ) h')
rw [pow_succ]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left _ ((hp.dvd_or_dvd _).resolve_left h)
rwa [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero), ← pow_succ, mul_left_comm]
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ b) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ a := by
rw [mul_comm] at h'
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left n h h'
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
| Mathlib/Algebra/Associated.lean | 154 | 170 | theorem Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α}
{n : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hpow : p ^ n.succ ∣ a ^ n.succ * b ^ n) (hb : ¬p ^ 2 ∣ b) : p ∣ a := by |
-- Suppose `p ∣ b`, write `b = p * x` and `hy : a ^ n.succ * b ^ n = p ^ n.succ * y`.
cases' hp.dvd_or_dvd ((dvd_pow_self p (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).trans hpow) with H hbdiv
· exact hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow H
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hbdiv
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hpow
-- Then we can divide out a common factor of `p ^ n` from the equation `hy`.
have : a ^ n.succ * x ^ n = p * y := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc _ p, ← pow_succ, ← hy, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc (a ^ n.succ), mul_comm _ (p ^ n),
mul_assoc]
-- So `p ∣ a` (and we're done) or `p ∣ x`, which can't be the case since it implies `p^2 ∣ b`.
refine hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow ((hp.dvd_or_dvd ⟨_, this⟩).resolve_right fun hdvdx => hb ?_)
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hdvdx
rw [pow_two, ← mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 621 | 628 | theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by |
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Filter
open Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
#align real.arcsin Real.arcsin
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arcsin_mem_Icc Real.arcsin_mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
#align real.range_arcsin Real.range_arcsin
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
#align real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
#align real.arcsin_proj_Icc Real.arcsin_projIcc
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
#align real.sin_arcsin' Real.sin_arcsin'
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.sin_arcsin Real.sin_arcsin
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
#align real.arcsin_sin' Real.arcsin_sin'
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_sin Real.arcsin_sin
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
#align real.strict_mono_on_arcsin Real.strictMonoOn_arcsin
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
#align real.monotone_arcsin Real.monotone_arcsin
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_arcsin Real.injOn_arcsin
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_inj Real.arcsin_inj
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align real.continuous_arcsin Real.continuous_arcsin
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
#align real.continuous_at_arcsin Real.continuousAt_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
#align real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq Real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
#align real.arcsin_zero Real.arcsin_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_one Real.arcsin_one
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_one_le Real.arcsin_of_one_le
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_neg_one Real.arcsin_neg_one
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one Real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
#align real.arcsin_neg Real.arcsin_neg
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
cases' lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin'
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 162 | 166 | theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by |
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
#align_import linear_algebra.dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a5f8186becdbc826190ced4312f8199f9db6a5"
noncomputable section
universe w w' u u' v v'
variable {R : Type u} {R' : Type u'} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'}
open Cardinal Submodule Function Set
section Module
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (R M)
protected irreducible_def Module.rank : Cardinal :=
⨆ ι : { s : Set M // LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) }, (#ι.1)
#align module.rank Module.rank
theorem rank_le_card : Module.rank R M ≤ #M :=
(Module.rank_def _ _).trans_le (ciSup_le' fun _ ↦ mk_set_le _)
lemma nonempty_linearIndependent_set : Nonempty {s : Set M // LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M)} :=
⟨⟨∅, linearIndependent_empty _ _⟩⟩
end
variable [Ring R] [Ring R'] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M₁] [Module R' M'] [Module R' M₁]
section
theorem LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (i : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') :=
lift_rank_le_of_injective_injective (RingHom.id R) f (fun _ h ↦ h) i f.map_smul
#align linear_map.lift_rank_le_of_injective LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective
theorem LinearMap.rank_le_of_injective (f : M →ₗ[R] M₁) (i : Injective f) :
Module.rank R M ≤ Module.rank R M₁ :=
Cardinal.lift_le.1 (f.lift_rank_le_of_injective i)
#align linear_map.rank_le_of_injective LinearMap.rank_le_of_injective
-- The proof is: a free submodule of the range lifts to a free submodule of the
-- source, by arbitrarily lifting a basis.
theorem lift_rank_range_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : Cardinal.lift.{v}
(Module.rank R (LinearMap.range f)) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) := by
simp only [Module.rank_def]
rw [Cardinal.lift_iSup (Cardinal.bddAbove_range.{v', v'} _)]
apply ciSup_le'
rintro ⟨s, li⟩
apply le_trans
swap
· apply Cardinal.lift_le.mpr
refine le_ciSup (Cardinal.bddAbove_range.{v, v} _) ⟨rangeSplitting f '' s, ?_⟩
apply LinearIndependent.of_comp f.rangeRestrict
convert li.comp (Equiv.Set.rangeSplittingImageEquiv f s) (Equiv.injective _) using 1
· exact (Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨Equiv.Set.rangeSplittingImageEquiv f s⟩).ge
#align lift_rank_range_le lift_rank_range_le
theorem rank_range_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₁) : Module.rank R (LinearMap.range f) ≤ Module.rank R M := by
simpa using lift_rank_range_le f
#align rank_range_le rank_range_le
theorem lift_rank_map_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (p : Submodule R M) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R (p.map f)) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R p) := by
have h := lift_rank_range_le (f.comp (Submodule.subtype p))
rwa [LinearMap.range_comp, range_subtype] at h
#align lift_rank_map_le lift_rank_map_le
theorem rank_map_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₁) (p : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (p.map f) ≤ Module.rank R p := by simpa using lift_rank_map_le f p
#align rank_map_le rank_map_le
theorem rank_le_of_submodule (s t : Submodule R M) (h : s ≤ t) :
Module.rank R s ≤ Module.rank R t :=
(Submodule.inclusion h).rank_le_of_injective fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ eq =>
Subtype.eq <| show x = y from Subtype.ext_iff_val.1 eq
#align rank_le_of_submodule rank_le_of_submodule
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Basic.lean | 296 | 300 | theorem LinearEquiv.lift_rank_eq (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') := by |
apply le_antisymm
· exact f.toLinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective f.injective
· exact f.symm.toLinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective f.symm.injective
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.type from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47adfab39a11a072db552f47594bf8ed2cf8a722"
namespace Equiv.Perm
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
theorem card_compl_support_modEq [DecidableEq α] {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] {σ : Perm α}
(hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : σ.supportᶜ.card ≡ Fintype.card α [MOD p] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd', ← Finset.card_compl, compl_compl, ← sum_cycleType]
· refine Multiset.dvd_sum fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨m, -, hm⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
obtain ⟨l, -, rfl⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ hm).mp (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hk))
exact dvd_pow_self _ fun h => (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hk).ne <| by rw [h, pow_zero]
· exact Finset.card_le_univ _
#align equiv.perm.card_compl_support_modeq Equiv.Perm.card_compl_support_modEq
open Function in
theorem card_fixedPoints_modEq [DecidableEq α] {f : Function.End α} {p n : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hf : f ^ p ^ n = 1) :
Fintype.card α ≡ Fintype.card f.fixedPoints [MOD p] := by
let σ : α ≃ α := ⟨f, f ^ (p ^ n - 1),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_sub_mul_pow f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_mul_pow_sub f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf)⟩
have hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1 := by
rw [DFunLike.ext'_iff, coe_pow]
exact (hom_coe_pow (fun g : Function.End α ↦ g) rfl (fun g h ↦ rfl) f (p ^ n)).symm.trans hf
suffices Fintype.card f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ.card from
this ▸ (card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm
suffices f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ by
simp only [this]; apply Fintype.card_coe
simp [σ, Set.ext_iff, IsFixedPt]
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : ¬p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : ∃ a : α, σ a = a := by
classical
contrapose! hα
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hα
exact Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 ((congr_arg _ (Finset.card_eq_zero.2 (compl_eq_bot.2 hα))).mp
(card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm)
#align equiv.perm.exists_fixed_point_of_prime Equiv.Perm.exists_fixed_point_of_prime
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime' {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) {a : α} (ha : σ a = a) : ∃ b : α, σ b = b ∧ b ≠ a := by
classical
have h : ∀ b : α, b ∈ σ.supportᶜ ↔ σ b = b := fun b => by
rw [Finset.mem_compl, mem_support, Classical.not_not]
obtain ⟨b, hb1, hb2⟩ := Finset.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hp.out.one_lt.trans_le
(Nat.le_of_dvd (Finset.card_pos.mpr ⟨a, (h a).mpr ha⟩) (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp
((card_compl_support_modEq hσ).trans (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mpr hα))))) a
exact ⟨b, (h b).mp hb1, hb2⟩
#align equiv.perm.exists_fixed_point_of_prime' Equiv.Perm.exists_fixed_point_of_prime'
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : Fintype.card α < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
classical exact isCycle_of_prime_order h1 (lt_of_le_of_lt σ.support.card_le_univ h2)
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle_of_prime_order' Equiv.Perm.isCycle_of_prime_order'
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order'' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h2 : orderOf σ = Fintype.card α) : σ.IsCycle :=
isCycle_of_prime_order' ((congr_arg Nat.Prime h2).mpr h1) <| by
rw [← one_mul (Fintype.card α), ← h2, mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ)]
exact one_lt_two
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle_of_prime_order'' Equiv.Perm.isCycle_of_prime_order''
section Cauchy
variable (G : Type*) [Group G] (n : ℕ)
def vectorsProdEqOne : Set (Vector G n) :=
{ v | v.toList.prod = 1 }
#align equiv.perm.vectors_prod_eq_one Equiv.Perm.vectorsProdEqOne
theorem subgroup_eq_top_of_swap_mem [DecidableEq α] {H : Subgroup (Perm α)}
[d : DecidablePred (· ∈ H)] {τ : Perm α} (h0 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h1 : Fintype.card α ∣ Fintype.card H) (h2 : τ ∈ H) (h3 : IsSwap τ) : H = ⊤ := by
haveI : Fact (Fintype.card α).Prime := ⟨h0⟩
obtain ⟨σ, hσ⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card (Fintype.card α) h1
have hσ1 : orderOf (σ : Perm α) = Fintype.card α := (Subgroup.orderOf_coe σ).trans hσ
have hσ2 : IsCycle ↑σ := isCycle_of_prime_order'' h0 hσ1
have hσ3 : (σ : Perm α).support = ⊤ :=
Finset.eq_univ_of_card (σ : Perm α).support (hσ2.orderOf.symm.trans hσ1)
have hσ4 : Subgroup.closure {↑σ, τ} = ⊤ := closure_prime_cycle_swap h0 hσ2 hσ3 h3
rw [eq_top_iff, ← hσ4, Subgroup.closure_le, Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨Subtype.mem σ, h2⟩
#align equiv.perm.subgroup_eq_top_of_swap_mem Equiv.Perm.subgroup_eq_top_of_swap_mem
def IsThreeCycle [DecidableEq α] (σ : Perm α) : Prop :=
σ.cycleType = {3}
#align equiv.perm.is_three_cycle Equiv.Perm.IsThreeCycle
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 644 | 660 | theorem isThreeCycle_swap_mul_swap_same {a b c : α} (ab : a ≠ b) (ac : a ≠ c) (bc : b ≠ c) :
IsThreeCycle (swap a b * swap a c) := by |
suffices h : support (swap a b * swap a c) = {a, b, c} by
rw [← card_support_eq_three_iff, h]
simp [ab, ac, bc]
apply le_antisymm ((support_mul_le _ _).trans fun x => _) fun x hx => ?_
· simp [ab, ac, bc]
· simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton] at hx
rw [mem_support]
simp only [Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne]
obtain rfl | rfl | rfl := hx
· rw [swap_apply_left, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne ac.symm bc.symm]
exact ac.symm
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne ab.symm bc, swap_apply_right]
exact ab
· rw [swap_apply_right, swap_apply_left]
exact bc
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.add from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3fb84046afd187b710170887195d50bada934ee"
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
section Sub
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.sub HasStrictFDerivAt.sub
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sub (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.sub HasFDerivAtFilter.sub
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
#align has_fderiv_within_at.sub HasFDerivWithinAt.sub
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
#align has_fderiv_at.sub HasFDerivAt.sub
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.sub DifferentiableWithinAt.sub
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.sub DifferentiableAt.sub
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sub (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
#align differentiable_on.sub DifferentiableOn.sub
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sub (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - g y := fun x => (hf x).sub (hg x)
#align differentiable.sub Differentiable.sub
theorem fderivWithin_sub (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x - fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_sub fderivWithin_sub
theorem fderiv_sub (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x - fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
#align fderiv_sub fderiv_sub
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sub_const (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x - c) f' x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add_const (-c)
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.sub_const HasStrictFDerivAt.sub_const
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sub_const (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => f x - c) f' x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add_const (-c)
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.sub_const HasFDerivAtFilter.sub_const
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sub_const (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x - c) f' s x :=
hf.sub_const c
#align has_fderiv_within_at.sub_const HasFDerivWithinAt.sub_const
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.sub_const (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (c : F) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x - c) f' x :=
hf.sub_const c
#align has_fderiv_at.sub_const HasFDerivAt.sub_const
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_sub_const {x : F} (c : F) : HasStrictFDerivAt (· - c) (id 𝕜 F) x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_id x).sub_const c
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_sub_const {x : F} (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (· - c) (id 𝕜 F) x :=
(hasFDerivAt_id x).sub_const c
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sub_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub_const c).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.sub_const DifferentiableWithinAt.sub_const
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff]
#align differentiable_within_at_sub_const_iff differentiableWithinAt_sub_const_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sub_const (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub_const c).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.sub_const DifferentiableAt.sub_const
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableAt_add_const_iff]
#align differentiable_at_sub_const_iff differentiableAt_sub_const_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sub_const (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).sub_const c
#align differentiable_on.sub_const DifferentiableOn.sub_const
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_add_const_iff]
#align differentiable_on_sub_const_iff differentiableOn_sub_const_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sub_const (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : F) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - c := fun x => (hf x).sub_const c
#align differentiable.sub_const Differentiable.sub_const
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - c) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiable_add_const_iff]
#align differentiable_sub_const_iff differentiable_sub_const_iff
theorem fderivWithin_sub_const (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, fderivWithin_add_const hxs]
#align fderiv_within_sub_const fderivWithin_sub_const
theorem fderiv_sub_const (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, fderiv_add_const]
#align fderiv_sub_const fderiv_sub_const
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c - f x) (-f') x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.neg.const_add c
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.const_sub HasStrictFDerivAt.const_sub
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.const_sub (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => c - f x) (-f') x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.neg.const_add c
#align has_fderiv_at_filter.const_sub HasFDerivAtFilter.const_sub
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_sub (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c - f x) (-f') s x :=
hf.const_sub c
#align has_fderiv_within_at.const_sub HasFDerivWithinAt.const_sub
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.const_sub (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (c : F) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c - f x) (-f') x :=
hf.const_sub c
#align has_fderiv_at.const_sub HasFDerivAt.const_sub
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_sub (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c - f y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_sub c).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.const_sub DifferentiableWithinAt.const_sub
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Add.lean | 671 | 673 | theorem differentiableWithinAt_const_sub_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c - f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by |
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.CompleteLinearOrder
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.SchroederBernstein
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
open scoped Classical
open Function Set Order
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {α β : Type u}
instance Cardinal.isEquivalent : Setoid (Type u) where
r α β := Nonempty (α ≃ β)
iseqv := ⟨
fun α => ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩,
fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩,
fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align cardinal.is_equivalent Cardinal.isEquivalent
@[pp_with_univ]
def Cardinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Cardinal.isEquivalent
#align cardinal Cardinal
namespace Cardinal
def mk : Type u → Cardinal :=
Quotient.mk'
#align cardinal.mk Cardinal.mk
@[inherit_doc]
scoped prefix:max "#" => Cardinal.mk
instance canLiftCardinalType : CanLift Cardinal.{u} (Type u) mk fun _ => True :=
⟨fun c _ => Quot.inductionOn c fun α => ⟨α, rfl⟩⟩
#align cardinal.can_lift_cardinal_Type Cardinal.canLiftCardinalType
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : Cardinal → Prop} (c : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α, p #α) : p c :=
Quotient.inductionOn c h
#align cardinal.induction_on Cardinal.inductionOn
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(h : ∀ α β, p #α #β) : p c₁ c₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ c₁ c₂ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₂ Cardinal.inductionOn₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(c₃ : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α β γ, p #α #β #γ) : p c₁ c₂ c₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ c₁ c₂ c₃ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₃ Cardinal.inductionOn₃
protected theorem eq : #α = #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align cardinal.eq Cardinal.eq
@[simp]
theorem mk'_def (α : Type u) : @Eq Cardinal ⟦α⟧ #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_def Cardinal.mk'_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (c : Cardinal) : #c.out = c :=
Quotient.out_eq _
#align cardinal.mk_out Cardinal.mk_out
def outMkEquiv {α : Type v} : (#α).out ≃ α :=
Nonempty.some <| Cardinal.eq.mp (by simp)
#align cardinal.out_mk_equiv Cardinal.outMkEquiv
theorem mk_congr (e : α ≃ β) : #α = #β :=
Quot.sound ⟨e⟩
#align cardinal.mk_congr Cardinal.mk_congr
alias _root_.Equiv.cardinal_eq := mk_congr
#align equiv.cardinal_eq Equiv.cardinal_eq
def map (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} :=
Quotient.map f fun α β ⟨e⟩ => ⟨hf α β e⟩
#align cardinal.map Cardinal.map
@[simp]
theorem map_mk (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) (α : Type u) :
map f hf #α = #(f α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.map_mk Cardinal.map_mk
def map₂ (f : Type u → Type v → Type w) (hf : ∀ α β γ δ, α ≃ β → γ ≃ δ → f α γ ≃ f β δ) :
Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{w} :=
Quotient.map₂ f fun α β ⟨e₁⟩ γ δ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨hf α β γ δ e₁ e₂⟩
#align cardinal.map₂ Cardinal.map₂
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (c : Cardinal.{v}) : Cardinal.{max v u} :=
map ULift.{u, v} (fun _ _ e => Equiv.ulift.trans <| e.trans Equiv.ulift.symm) c
#align cardinal.lift Cardinal.lift
@[simp]
theorem mk_uLift (α) : #(ULift.{v, u} α) = lift.{v} #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_ulift Cardinal.mk_uLift
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a => inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_umax Cardinal.lift_umax
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{max v u, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
lift_umax
#align cardinal.lift_umax' Cardinal.lift_umax'
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_id' (a : Cardinal.{max u v}) : lift.{u} a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_congr Equiv.ulift
#align cardinal.lift_id' Cardinal.lift_id'
@[simp]
theorem lift_id (a : Cardinal) : lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_id Cardinal.lift_id
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id'.{0, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_uzero Cardinal.lift_uzero
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift.{u_1} (a : Cardinal.{u_1}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_lift Cardinal.lift_lift
instance : LE Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun q₁ q₂ =>
Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ (fun α β => Nonempty <| α ↪ β) fun _ _ _ _ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ =>
propext ⟨fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁ e₂⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁.symm e₂.symm⟩⟩⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Cardinal.{u} where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.refl _⟩
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact Quotient.sound (e₁.antisymm e₂)
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.partialOrder with
le_total := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩
apply Embedding.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem le_def (α β : Type u) : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align cardinal.le_def Cardinal.le_def
theorem mk_le_of_injective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_injective Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.cardinal_le {α β : Type u} (f : α ↪ β) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨f⟩
#align function.embedding.cardinal_le Function.Embedding.cardinal_le
theorem mk_le_of_surjective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : #β ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.ofSurjective f hf⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective Cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_set {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} : c ≤ #α ↔ ∃ p : Set α, #p = c :=
⟨inductionOn c fun _ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ => ⟨Set.range f, (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).cardinal_eq.symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨⟨Subtype.val, fun _ _ => Subtype.eq⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set Cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set
theorem mk_subtype_le {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : #(Subtype p) ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.subtype p⟩
#align cardinal.mk_subtype_le Cardinal.mk_subtype_le
theorem mk_set_le (s : Set α) : #s ≤ #α :=
mk_subtype_le s
#align cardinal.mk_set_le Cardinal.mk_set_le
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
theorem out_embedding {c c' : Cardinal} : c ≤ c' ↔ Nonempty (c.out ↪ c'.out) := by
trans
· rw [← Quotient.out_eq c, ← Quotient.out_eq c']
· rw [mk'_def, mk'_def, le_def]
#align cardinal.out_embedding Cardinal.out_embedding
theorem lift_mk_le {α : Type v} {β : Type w} :
lift.{max u w} #α ≤ lift.{max u v} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift.symm Equiv.ulift.symm f⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le
theorem lift_mk_le' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
lift_mk_le.{0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le' Cardinal.lift_mk_le'
theorem lift_mk_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{max v w} #α = lift.{max u w} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'.trans
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Equiv.ulift.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift.symm⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq Cardinal.lift_mk_eq
theorem lift_mk_eq' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α = lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
lift_mk_eq.{u, v, 0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq' Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_mk_le.{u}
#align cardinal.lift_le Cardinal.lift_le
-- Porting note: changed `simps` to `simps!` because the linter told to do so.
@[simps! (config := .asFn)]
def liftOrderEmbedding : Cardinal.{v} ↪o Cardinal.{max v u} :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff lift.{u, v} fun _ _ => lift_le
#align cardinal.lift_order_embedding Cardinal.liftOrderEmbedding
theorem lift_injective : Injective lift.{u, v} :=
liftOrderEmbedding.injective
#align cardinal.lift_injective Cardinal.lift_injective
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a = lift.{v, u} b ↔ a = b :=
lift_injective.eq_iff
#align cardinal.lift_inj Cardinal.lift_inj
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a < lift.{v, u} b ↔ a < b :=
liftOrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt
#align cardinal.lift_lt Cardinal.lift_lt
theorem lift_strictMono : StrictMono lift := fun _ _ => lift_lt.2
#align cardinal.lift_strict_mono Cardinal.lift_strictMono
theorem lift_monotone : Monotone lift :=
lift_strictMono.monotone
#align cardinal.lift_monotone Cardinal.lift_monotone
instance : Zero Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PEmpty` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 0)⟩
instance : Inhabited Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero (α : Type u) [IsEmpty α] : #α = 0 :=
(Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero Cardinal.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
#align cardinal.lift_zero Cardinal.lift_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_zero {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_zero
#align cardinal.lift_eq_zero Cardinal.lift_eq_zero
theorem mk_eq_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun e =>
let ⟨h⟩ := Quotient.exact e
h.isEmpty,
@mk_eq_zero α⟩
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff
theorem mk_ne_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α :=
(not_iff_not.2 mk_eq_zero_iff).trans not_isEmpty_iff
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_ne_zero (α : Type u) [Nonempty α] : #α ≠ 0 :=
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero Cardinal.mk_ne_zero
instance : One Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PUnit` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 1)⟩
instance : Nontrivial Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, mk_ne_zero _⟩⟩
theorem mk_eq_one (α : Type u) [Unique α] : #α = 1 :=
(Equiv.equivOfUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_one Cardinal.mk_eq_one
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
#align cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton Cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
#align set.subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one
instance : Add Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Sum fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.sumCongr⟩
theorem add_def (α β : Type u) : #α + #β = #(Sum α β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.add_def Cardinal.add_def
instance : NatCast Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun n => lift #(Fin n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_sum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α ⊕ β) = lift.{v, u} #α + lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.sumCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_sum Cardinal.mk_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_option {α : Type u} : #(Option α) = #α + 1 := by
rw [(Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit.{u, u} α).cardinal_eq, mk_sum, mk_eq_one PUnit, lift_id, lift_id]
#align cardinal.mk_option Cardinal.mk_option
@[simp]
theorem mk_psum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(PSum α β) = lift.{v} #α + lift.{u} #β :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.psumEquivSum α β)).trans (mk_sum α β)
#align cardinal.mk_psum Cardinal.mk_psum
@[simp]
theorem mk_fintype (α : Type u) [h : Fintype α] : #α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_congr (Fintype.equivOfCardEq (by simp))
protected theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} (Fin (n+1))) = # (ULift.{u} (Fin n)) + 1
rw [← mk_option, mk_fintype, mk_fintype]
simp only [Fintype.card_ulift, Fintype.card_fin, Fintype.card_option]
instance : Mul Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Prod fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.prodCongr⟩
theorem mul_def (α β : Type u) : #α * #β = #(α × β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mul_def Cardinal.mul_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_prod (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α × β) = lift.{v, u} #α * lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_prod Cardinal.mk_prod
private theorem mul_comm' (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : a * b = b * a :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodComm α β
instance instPowCardinal : Pow Cardinal.{u} Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ (fun α β => β → α) fun _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂ => e₂.arrowCongr e₁⟩
theorem power_def (α β : Type u) : #α ^ #β = #(β → α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.power_def Cardinal.power_def
theorem mk_arrow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α → β) = (lift.{u} #β^lift.{v} #α) :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_arrow Cardinal.mk_arrow
@[simp]
theorem lift_power (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a ^ b) = lift.{v} a ^ lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.ulift.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_power Cardinal.lift_power
@[simp]
theorem power_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.power_zero Cardinal.power_zero
@[simp]
theorem power_one {a : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^ (1 : Cardinal) = a :=
inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr (Equiv.funUnique (ULift.{u} (Fin 1)) α)
#align cardinal.power_one Cardinal.power_one
theorem power_add {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow β γ α
#align cardinal.power_add Cardinal.power_add
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Cardinal.{u} where
zero := 0
one := 1
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
zero_add a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.emptySum (ULift (Fin 0)) α
add_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))
add_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumAssoc α β γ
add_comm a b := inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumComm α β
zero_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
mul_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
one_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.uniqueProd α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_one a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ
mul_comm := mul_comm'
left_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodSumDistrib α β γ
right_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumProdDistrib α β γ
nsmul := nsmulRec
npow n c := c ^ (n : Cardinal)
npow_zero := @power_zero
npow_succ n c := show c ^ (↑(n + 1) : Cardinal) = c ^ (↑n : Cardinal) * c
by rw [Cardinal.cast_succ, power_add, power_one, mul_comm']
natCast := (fun n => lift.{u} #(Fin n) : ℕ → Cardinal.{u})
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := Cardinal.cast_succ
-- Porting note: Proof used to be simp, needed to remind simp that 1 + 1 = 2
theorem lift_two : lift.{u, v} 2 = 2 := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two Cardinal.lift_two
@[simp]
theorem mk_set {α : Type u} : #(Set α) = 2 ^ #α := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two, Set, mk_arrow]
#align cardinal.mk_set Cardinal.mk_set
@[simp]
theorem mk_powerset {α : Type u} (s : Set α) : #(↥(𝒫 s)) = 2 ^ #(↥s) :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.Set.powerset s)).trans mk_set
#align cardinal.mk_powerset Cardinal.mk_powerset
theorem lift_two_power (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (2 ^ a) = 2 ^ lift.{v} a := by
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two_power Cardinal.lift_two_power
section OrderProperties
open Sum
protected theorem zero_le : ∀ a : Cardinal, 0 ≤ a := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.ofIsEmpty⟩
#align cardinal.zero_le Cardinal.zero_le
private theorem add_le_add' : ∀ {a b c d : Cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a + c ≤ b + d := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.sumMap e₂⟩
-- #align cardinal.add_le_add' Cardinal.add_le_add'
instance add_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => add_le_add' le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_covariant_class Cardinal.add_covariantClass
instance add_swap_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h => add_le_add' h le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_swap_covariant_class Cardinal.add_swap_covariantClass
instance canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring : CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.partialOrder with
bot := 0
bot_le := Cardinal.zero_le
add_le_add_left := fun a b => add_le_add_left
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
have : Sum α ((range f)ᶜ : Set β) ≃ β :=
(Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.ofInjective f hf) (Equiv.refl _)).trans <|
Equiv.Set.sumCompl (range f)
⟨#(↥(range f)ᶜ), mk_congr this.symm⟩
le_self_add := fun a b => (add_zero a).ge.trans <| add_le_add_left (Cardinal.zero_le _) _
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
simpa only [mul_def, mk_eq_zero_iff, isEmpty_prod] using id }
instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Cardinal.linearOrder with }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.linearOrder with
mul_le_mul_left := @mul_le_mul_left' _ _ _ _
zero_le_one := zero_le _ }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
-- Porting note: new
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
theorem zero_power_le (c : Cardinal.{u}) : (0 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ c ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : c = 0
· rw [h, power_zero]
· rw [zero_power h]
apply zero_le
#align cardinal.zero_power_le Cardinal.zero_power_le
theorem power_le_power_left : ∀ {a b c : Cardinal}, a ≠ 0 → b ≤ c → a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ hα ⟨e⟩
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 hα
exact ⟨@Function.Embedding.arrowCongrLeft _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_left Cardinal.power_le_power_left
theorem self_le_power (a : Cardinal) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact zero_le _
· convert power_le_power_left ha hb
exact power_one.symm
#align cardinal.self_le_power Cardinal.self_le_power
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 736 | 741 | theorem cantor (a : Cardinal.{u}) : a < 2 ^ a := by |
induction' a using Cardinal.inductionOn with α
rw [← mk_set]
refine ⟨⟨⟨singleton, fun a b => singleton_eq_singleton_iff.1⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
exact cantor_injective f hf
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.factorization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
-- Workaround for lean4#2038
attribute [-instance] instBEqNat
open Nat Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
def factorization (n : ℕ) : ℕ →₀ ℕ where
support := n.primeFactors
toFun p := if p.Prime then padicValNat p n else 0
mem_support_toFun := by simp [not_or]; aesop
#align nat.factorization Nat.factorization
@[simp] lemma support_factorization (n : ℕ) : (factorization n).support = n.primeFactors := rfl
theorem factorization_def (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : n.factorization p = padicValNat p n := by
simpa [factorization] using absurd pp
#align nat.factorization_def Nat.factorization_def
@[simp]
theorem factors_count_eq {n p : ℕ} : n.factors.count p = n.factorization p := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn0)
· simp [factorization, count]
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt prime_of_mem_factors pp)]
simp [factorization, pp]
simp only [factorization_def _ pp]
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
exact List.le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.mp le_rfl |>.subperm
· rw [← lt_add_one_iff, lt_iff_not_ge, ge_iff_le,
le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
intro h
have := h.count_le p
simp at this
#align nat.factors_count_eq Nat.factors_count_eq
theorem factorization_eq_factors_multiset (n : ℕ) :
n.factorization = Multiset.toFinsupp (n.factors : Multiset ℕ) := by
ext p
simp
#align nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset Nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset
theorem multiplicity_eq_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
multiplicity p n = n.factorization p := by
simp [factorization, pp, padicValNat_def' pp.ne_one hn.bot_lt]
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization Nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization
@[simp]
theorem factorization_prod_pow_eq_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization.prod (· ^ ·) = n := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp only [← prod_toMultiset, factorization, Multiset.prod_coe, Multiset.toFinsupp_toMultiset]
exact prod_factors hn
#align nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self
theorem eq_of_factorization_eq {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ p : ℕ, a.factorization p = b.factorization p) : a = b :=
eq_of_perm_factors ha hb (by simpa only [List.perm_iff_count, factors_count_eq] using h)
#align nat.eq_of_factorization_eq Nat.eq_of_factorization_eq
theorem factorization_inj : Set.InjOn factorization { x : ℕ | x ≠ 0 } := fun a ha b hb h =>
eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => by simp [h]
#align nat.factorization_inj Nat.factorization_inj
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero : factorization 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_zero Nat.factorization_zero
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one : factorization 1 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_one Nat.factorization_one
#noalign nat.support_factorization
#align nat.factor_iff_mem_factorization Nat.mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factorization Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factorization Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.le_of_mem_factorization Nat.le_of_mem_primeFactors
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff (n p : ℕ) :
n.factorization p = 0 ↔ ¬p.Prime ∨ ¬p ∣ n ∨ n = 0 := by
simp_rw [← not_mem_support_iff, support_factorization, mem_primeFactors, not_and_or, not_ne_iff]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = 0 := by simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hp]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : n.factorization p = 0 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 0 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_zero
#align nat.factorization_zero_right Nat.factorization_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
#align nat.factorization_one_right Nat.factorization_one_right
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_factors <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
#align nat.dvd_of_factorization_pos Nat.dvd_of_factorization_pos
theorem Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : p ∣ n) :
0 < n.factorization p := by
rwa [← factors_count_eq, count_pos_iff_mem, mem_factors_iff_dvd hn hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd Nat.Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hr : ¬p ∣ r) :
(p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
apply factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd
rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (Dvd.intro i rfl)]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero_iff.mp hr0).2
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff' Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem factorization_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).factorization = a.factorization + b.factorization := by
ext p
simp only [add_apply, ← factors_count_eq, perm_iff_count.mp (perm_factors_mul ha hb) p,
count_append]
#align nat.factorization_mul Nat.factorization_mul
#align nat.factorization_mul_support Nat.primeFactors_mul
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
#align nat.prod_factorization_eq_prod_factors Nat.prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
theorem factorization_prod {α : Type*} {S : Finset α} {g : α → ℕ} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ≠ 0) :
(S.prod g).factorization = S.sum fun x => (g x).factorization := by
classical
ext p
refine Finset.induction_on' S ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro x T hxS hTS hxT IH
have hT : T.prod g ≠ 0 := prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr fun x hx => hS x (hTS hx)
simp [prod_insert hxT, sum_insert hxT, ← IH, factorization_mul (hS x hxS) hT]
#align nat.factorization_prod Nat.factorization_prod
@[simp]
theorem factorization_pow (n k : ℕ) : factorization (n ^ k) = k • n.factorization := by
induction' k with k ih; · simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [Nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, factorization_mul hn (pow_ne_zero _ hn), ih,
add_smul, one_smul, add_comm]
#align nat.factorization_pow Nat.factorization_pow
@[simp]
protected theorem Prime.factorization {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization = single p 1 := by
ext q
rw [← factors_count_eq, factors_prime hp, single_apply, count_singleton', if_congr eq_comm] <;>
rfl
#align nat.prime.factorization Nat.Prime.factorization
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_self Nat.Prime.factorization_self
theorem Prime.factorization_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : (p ^ k).factorization = single p k := by
simp [hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_pow Nat.Prime.factorization_pow
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
-- Porting note: explicitly added `Finsupp.prod_single_index`
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
simp
#align nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single Nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
#align nat.prime.eq_of_factorization_pos Nat.Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos
theorem prod_pow_factorization_eq_self {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ f.support → Prime p) :
(f.prod (· ^ ·)).factorization = f := by
have h : ∀ x : ℕ, x ∈ f.support → x ^ f x ≠ 0 := fun p hp =>
pow_ne_zero _ (Prime.ne_zero (hf p hp))
simp only [Finsupp.prod, factorization_prod h]
conv =>
rhs
rw [(sum_single f).symm]
exact sum_congr rfl fun p hp => Prime.factorization_pow (hf p hp)
#align nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self Nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
#align nat.eq_factorization_iff Nat.eq_factorization_iff
def factorizationEquiv : ℕ+ ≃ { f : ℕ →₀ ℕ | ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p } where
toFun := fun ⟨n, _⟩ => ⟨n.factorization, fun _ => prime_of_mem_primeFactors⟩
invFun := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
⟨f.prod _, prod_pow_pos_of_zero_not_mem_support fun H => not_prime_zero (hf 0 H)⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => Subtype.ext <| factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hx.ne.symm
right_inv := fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => Subtype.ext <| prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf
#align nat.factorization_equiv Nat.factorizationEquiv
theorem factorizationEquiv_apply (n : ℕ+) : (factorizationEquiv n).1 = n.1.factorization := by
cases n
rfl
#align nat.factorization_equiv_apply Nat.factorizationEquiv_apply
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
#align nat.factorization_equiv_inv_apply Nat.factorizationEquiv_inv_apply
-- Porting note: Lean 4 thinks we need `HPow` without this
set_option quotPrecheck false in
notation "ord_proj[" p "] " n:arg => p ^ Nat.factorization n p
notation "ord_compl[" p "] " n:arg => n / ord_proj[p] n
@[simp]
theorem ord_proj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ord_proj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
#align nat.ord_proj_of_not_prime Nat.ord_proj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ord_compl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ord_compl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
#align nat.ord_compl_of_not_prime Nat.ord_compl_of_not_prime
theorem ord_proj_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ord_proj[p] n ∣ n := by
if hp : p.Prime then ?_ else simp [hp]
rw [← factors_count_eq]
apply dvd_of_factors_subperm (pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero)
rw [hp.factors_pow, List.subperm_ext_iff]
intro q hq
simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hq]
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd
theorem ord_proj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ord_proj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
#align nat.ord_proj_pos Nat.ord_proj_pos
theorem ord_proj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ord_proj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_proj_le Nat.ord_proj_le
theorem ord_compl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ord_compl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p hn) (ord_proj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
#align nat.ord_compl_pos Nat.ord_compl_pos
theorem ord_compl_le (n p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
#align nat.ord_compl_le Nat.ord_compl_le
theorem ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ord_proj[p] n * ord_compl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self Nat.ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self
theorem ord_proj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ord_proj[p] (a * b) = ord_proj[p] a * ord_proj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
#align nat.ord_proj_mul Nat.ord_proj_mul
theorem ord_compl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] (a * b) = ord_compl[p] a * ord_compl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ord_proj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ord_proj_dvd a p) (ord_proj_dvd b p)]
#align nat.ord_compl_mul Nat.ord_compl_mul
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_factorization Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactors
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ord_proj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
lt_pow_self pp.one_lt _
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
#align nat.factorization_lt Nat.factorization_lt
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ord_proj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
#align nat.factorization_le_of_le_pow Nat.factorization_le_of_le_pow
theorem factorization_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
d.factorization ≤ n.factorization ↔ d ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro hdn
set K := n.factorization - d.factorization with hK
use K.prod (· ^ ·)
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, ← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hd,
← Finsupp.prod_add_index' pow_zero pow_add, hK, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hdn]
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [factorization_mul hd (right_ne_zero_of_mul hn)]
simp
#align nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
#align nat.factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd Nat.factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd
theorem pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : p.Prime) :
¬p ^ (n.factorization p + 1) ∣ n := by
intro h
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos hp.pos _).ne' hn] at h
simpa [hp.factorization] using h p
#align nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd Nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
#align nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_left Nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_left
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 445 | 448 | theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by |
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
#align_import data.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
#align polynomial Polynomial
#align polynomial.of_finsupp Polynomial.ofFinsupp
#align polynomial.to_finsupp Polynomial.toFinsupp
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
#align polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp Polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
#align polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp Polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
#align polynomial.eta Polynomial.eta
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
#align polynomial.has_zero Polynomial.zero
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
#align polynomial.one Polynomial.one
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
#align polynomial.has_add Polynomial.add'
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
#align polynomial.has_neg Polynomial.neg'
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
#align polynomial.has_sub Polynomial.sub
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
#align polynomial.has_mul Polynomial.mul'
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
#align polynomial.smul_zero_class Polynomial.smulZeroClass
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
#align polynomial.has_pow Polynomial.pow
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_add Polynomial.ofFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_neg Polynomial.ofFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 178 | 180 | theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by |
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Star
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
#align_import analysis.convex.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
variable {𝕜 E F β : Type*}
open LinearMap Set
open scoped Convex Pointwise
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {s : Set E} {x : E}
theorem convex_iff_openSegment_subset :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => starConvex_iff_openSegment_subset
#align convex_iff_open_segment_subset convex_iff_openSegment_subset
theorem convex_iff_forall_pos :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => starConvex_iff_forall_pos
#align convex_iff_forall_pos convex_iff_forall_pos
theorem convex_iff_pairwise_pos : Convex 𝕜 s ↔
s.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine convex_iff_forall_pos.trans ⟨fun h x hx y hy _ => h hx hy, ?_⟩
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rwa [Convex.combo_self hab]
· exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align convex_iff_pairwise_pos convex_iff_pairwise_pos
theorem Convex.starConvex_iff (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (h : s.Nonempty) : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun hxs => hxs.mem h, hs.starConvex⟩
#align convex.star_convex_iff Convex.starConvex_iff
protected theorem Set.Subsingleton.convex {s : Set E} (h : s.Subsingleton) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr (h.pairwise _)
#align set.subsingleton.convex Set.Subsingleton.convex
theorem convex_singleton (c : E) : Convex 𝕜 ({c} : Set E) :=
subsingleton_singleton.convex
#align convex_singleton convex_singleton
theorem convex_zero : Convex 𝕜 (0 : Set E) :=
convex_singleton _
#align convex_zero convex_zero
theorem convex_segment (x y : E) : Convex 𝕜 [x -[𝕜] y] := by
rintro p ⟨ap, bp, hap, hbp, habp, rfl⟩ q ⟨aq, bq, haq, hbq, habq, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine
⟨a * ap + b * aq, a * bp + b * bq, add_nonneg (mul_nonneg ha hap) (mul_nonneg hb haq),
add_nonneg (mul_nonneg ha hbp) (mul_nonneg hb hbq), ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [add_add_add_comm, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, habp, habq, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
· simp_rw [add_smul, mul_smul, smul_add]
exact add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
#align convex_segment convex_segment
theorem Convex.linear_image (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : Convex 𝕜 (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
exact ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hx hy ha hb hab, by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
#align convex.linear_image Convex.linear_image
theorem Convex.is_linear_image (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
Convex 𝕜 (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image <| hf.mk' f
#align convex.is_linear_image Convex.is_linear_image
theorem Convex.linear_preimage {s : Set F} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
Convex 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]
exact hs hx hy ha hb hab
#align convex.linear_preimage Convex.linear_preimage
theorem Convex.is_linear_preimage {s : Set F} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
Convex 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) :=
hs.linear_preimage <| hf.mk' f
#align convex.is_linear_preimage Convex.is_linear_preimage
theorem Convex.add {t : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) : Convex 𝕜 (s + t) := by
rw [← add_image_prod]
exact (hs.prod ht).is_linear_image IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_add
#align convex.add Convex.add
variable (𝕜 E)
def convexAddSubmonoid : AddSubmonoid (Set E) where
carrier := {s : Set E | Convex 𝕜 s}
zero_mem' := convex_zero
add_mem' := Convex.add
#align convex_add_submonoid convexAddSubmonoid
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_convexAddSubmonoid : ↑(convexAddSubmonoid 𝕜 E) = {s : Set E | Convex 𝕜 s} :=
rfl
#align coe_convex_add_submonoid coe_convexAddSubmonoid
variable {𝕜 E}
@[simp]
theorem mem_convexAddSubmonoid {s : Set E} : s ∈ convexAddSubmonoid 𝕜 E ↔ Convex 𝕜 s :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_convex_add_submonoid mem_convexAddSubmonoid
theorem convex_list_sum {l : List (Set E)} (h : ∀ i ∈ l, Convex 𝕜 i) : Convex 𝕜 l.sum :=
(convexAddSubmonoid 𝕜 E).list_sum_mem h
#align convex_list_sum convex_list_sum
theorem convex_multiset_sum {s : Multiset (Set E)} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Convex 𝕜 i) : Convex 𝕜 s.sum :=
(convexAddSubmonoid 𝕜 E).multiset_sum_mem _ h
#align convex_multiset_sum convex_multiset_sum
theorem convex_sum {ι} {s : Finset ι} (t : ι → Set E) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Convex 𝕜 (t i)) :
Convex 𝕜 (∑ i ∈ s, t i) :=
(convexAddSubmonoid 𝕜 E).sum_mem h
#align convex_sum convex_sum
theorem Convex.vadd (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (z : E) : Convex 𝕜 (z +ᵥ s) := by
simp_rw [← image_vadd, vadd_eq_add, ← singleton_add]
exact (convex_singleton _).add hs
#align convex.vadd Convex.vadd
theorem Convex.translate (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (z : E) : Convex 𝕜 ((fun x => z + x) '' s) :=
hs.vadd _
#align convex.translate Convex.translate
theorem Convex.translate_preimage_right (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (z : E) :
Convex 𝕜 ((fun x => z + x) ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
have h := hs hx hy ha hb hab
rwa [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, ← add_smul, hab, one_smul] at h
#align convex.translate_preimage_right Convex.translate_preimage_right
theorem Convex.translate_preimage_left (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (z : E) :
Convex 𝕜 ((fun x => x + z) ⁻¹' s) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hs.translate_preimage_right z
#align convex.translate_preimage_left Convex.translate_preimage_left
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing 𝕜]
section
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Basic.lean | 621 | 627 | theorem Set.OrdConnected.convex_of_chain [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [OrderedAddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E]
[OrderedSMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs : s.OrdConnected) (h : IsChain (· ≤ ·) s) : Convex 𝕜 s := by |
refine convex_iff_segment_subset.mpr fun x hx y hy => ?_
obtain hxy | hyx := h.total hx hy
· exact (segment_subset_Icc hxy).trans (hs.out hx hy)
· rw [segment_symm]
exact (segment_subset_Icc hyx).trans (hs.out hy hx)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
#align_import algebra.associated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime (0 : α) := fun h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align not_prime_zero not_prime_zero
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime (1 : α) := fun h => h.not_unit isUnit_one
#align not_prime_one not_prime_one
theorem Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{a b : α} : a ∣ p * b → p ∣ a ∨ a ∣ b := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
rcases hp.2.2 a c (hc ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _) with (h | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' hp.ne_zero] at hc
exact Or.inr (hc.symm ▸ dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul Prime.left_dvd_or_dvd_right_of_dvd_mul
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ a) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero]
exact one_dvd b
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := ih (dvd_trans (pow_dvd_pow p n.le_succ) h')
rw [pow_succ]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left _ ((hp.dvd_or_dvd _).resolve_left h)
rwa [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero), ← pow_succ, mul_left_comm]
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α} (hp : Prime p)
(n : ℕ) (h : ¬p ∣ b) (h' : p ^ n ∣ a * b) : p ^ n ∣ a := by
rw [mul_comm] at h'
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left n h h'
#align prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
theorem Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p a b : α}
{n : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hpow : p ^ n.succ ∣ a ^ n.succ * b ^ n) (hb : ¬p ^ 2 ∣ b) : p ∣ a := by
-- Suppose `p ∣ b`, write `b = p * x` and `hy : a ^ n.succ * b ^ n = p ^ n.succ * y`.
cases' hp.dvd_or_dvd ((dvd_pow_self p (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).trans hpow) with H hbdiv
· exact hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow H
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hbdiv
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hpow
-- Then we can divide out a common factor of `p ^ n` from the equation `hy`.
have : a ^ n.succ * x ^ n = p * y := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero) ?_
rw [← mul_assoc _ p, ← pow_succ, ← hy, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc (a ^ n.succ), mul_comm _ (p ^ n),
mul_assoc]
-- So `p ∣ a` (and we're done) or `p ∣ x`, which can't be the case since it implies `p^2 ∣ b`.
refine hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow ((hp.dvd_or_dvd ⟨_, this⟩).resolve_right fun hdvdx => hb ?_)
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hdvdx
rw [pow_two, ← mul_assoc]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd Prime.dvd_of_pow_dvd_pow_mul_pow_of_square_not_dvd
theorem prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p x y : α} (h : Prime p)
{i : ℕ} (hxy : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x * y) : p ^ (i + 1) ∣ x ∨ p ∣ y := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro hy
induction' i with i ih generalizing x
· rw [pow_one] at hxy ⊢
exact (h.dvd_or_dvd hxy).resolve_right hy
rw [pow_succ'] at hxy ⊢
obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := (h.dvd_or_dvd (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd hxy)).resolve_right hy
rw [mul_assoc] at hxy
exact mul_dvd_mul_left p (ih ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h.ne_zero).mp hxy))
#align prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul prime_pow_succ_dvd_mul
structure Irreducible [Monoid α] (p : α) : Prop where
not_unit : ¬IsUnit p
isUnit_or_isUnit' : ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b
#align irreducible Irreducible
theorem irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p : α} :
Irreducible p ↔ ¬IsUnit p ∧ ∀ a b, p = a * b → IsUnit a ∨ IsUnit b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align irreducible_iff irreducible_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_one [Monoid α] : ¬Irreducible (1 : α) := by simp [irreducible_iff]
#align not_irreducible_one not_irreducible_one
theorem Irreducible.ne_one [Monoid α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 1
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_one hp
#align irreducible.ne_one Irreducible.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_irreducible_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ¬Irreducible (0 : α)
| ⟨hn0, h⟩ =>
have : IsUnit (0 : α) ∨ IsUnit (0 : α) := h 0 0 (mul_zero 0).symm
this.elim hn0 hn0
#align not_irreducible_zero not_irreducible_zero
theorem Irreducible.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero α] : ∀ {p : α}, Irreducible p → p ≠ 0
| _, hp, rfl => not_irreducible_zero hp
#align irreducible.ne_zero Irreducible.ne_zero
theorem of_irreducible_mul {α} [Monoid α] {x y : α} : Irreducible (x * y) → IsUnit x ∨ IsUnit y
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h _ _ rfl
#align of_irreducible_mul of_irreducible_mul
theorem not_irreducible_pow {α} [Monoid α] {x : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) :
¬ Irreducible (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n =>
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
have := h₂ _ _ (pow_succ _ _)
rw [isUnit_pow_iff (Nat.succ_ne_succ.mp hn), or_self] at this
exact h₁ (this.pow _)
#noalign of_irreducible_pow
theorem irreducible_or_factor {α} [Monoid α] (x : α) (h : ¬IsUnit x) :
Irreducible x ∨ ∃ a b, ¬IsUnit a ∧ ¬IsUnit b ∧ a * b = x := by
haveI := Classical.dec
refine or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun H => ?_
simp? [h, irreducible_iff] at H ⊢ says
simp only [exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and, irreducible_iff, h, not_false_eq_true,
true_and] at H ⊢
refine fun a b h => by_contradiction fun o => ?_
simp? [not_or] at o says simp only [not_or] at o
exact H _ o.1 _ o.2 h.symm
#align irreducible_or_factor irreducible_or_factor
theorem Irreducible.dvd_symm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q → q ∣ p := by
rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
rw [IsUnit.mul_right_dvd (Or.resolve_left (of_irreducible_mul hq) hp.not_unit)]
#align irreducible.dvd_symm Irreducible.dvd_symm
theorem Irreducible.dvd_comm [Monoid α] {p q : α} (hp : Irreducible p) (hq : Irreducible q) :
p ∣ q ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨hp.dvd_symm hq, hq.dvd_symm hp⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_comm Irreducible.dvd_comm
section
variable [Monoid α]
theorem irreducible_units_mul (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (↑a * b) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_units_mul, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← a.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← a⁻¹.isUnit_units_mul]
apply h
rw [mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align irreducible_units_mul irreducible_units_mul
theorem irreducible_isUnit_mul {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_units_mul a b
#align irreducible_is_unit_mul irreducible_isUnit_mul
theorem irreducible_mul_units (a : αˣ) (b : α) : Irreducible (b * ↑a) ↔ Irreducible b := by
simp only [irreducible_iff, Units.isUnit_mul_units, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun h A B HAB => ?_, fun h A B HAB => ?_⟩
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB]
· rw [← Units.isUnit_mul_units B a⁻¹]
apply h
rw [← mul_assoc, ← HAB, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]
#align irreducible_mul_units irreducible_mul_units
theorem irreducible_mul_isUnit {a b : α} (h : IsUnit a) : Irreducible (b * a) ↔ Irreducible b :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
ha ▸ irreducible_mul_units a b
#align irreducible_mul_is_unit irreducible_mul_isUnit
theorem irreducible_mul_iff {a b : α} :
Irreducible (a * b) ↔ Irreducible a ∧ IsUnit b ∨ Irreducible b ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· refine fun h => Or.imp (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (fun h' => ⟨?_, h'⟩) (h.isUnit_or_isUnit rfl).symm
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit h'] at h
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul h'] at h
· rintro (⟨ha, hb⟩ | ⟨hb, ha⟩)
· rwa [irreducible_mul_isUnit hb]
· rwa [irreducible_isUnit_mul ha]
#align irreducible_mul_iff irreducible_mul_iff
end
def Associated [Monoid α] (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ u : αˣ, x * u = y
#align associated Associated
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
attribute [local instance] Associated.setoid
theorem unit_associated_one [Monoid α] {u : αˣ} : (u : α) ~ᵤ 1 :=
⟨u⁻¹, Units.mul_inv u⟩
#align unit_associated_one unit_associated_one
@[simp]
theorem associated_one_iff_isUnit [Monoid α] {a : α} : (a : α) ~ᵤ 1 ↔ IsUnit a :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨c, h⟩ := h.symm
h ▸ ⟨c, (one_mul _).symm⟩)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ => Associated.symm ⟨c, by simp [h]⟩
#align associated_one_iff_is_unit associated_one_iff_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem associated_zero_iff_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero α] (a : α) : a ~ᵤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨u, h⟩ := h.symm
simpa using h.symm)
fun h => h ▸ Associated.refl a
#align associated_zero_iff_eq_zero associated_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem associated_one_of_mul_eq_one [CommMonoid α] {a : α} (b : α) (hab : a * b = 1) : a ~ᵤ 1 :=
show (Units.mkOfMulEqOne a b hab : α) ~ᵤ 1 from unit_associated_one
#align associated_one_of_mul_eq_one associated_one_of_mul_eq_one
theorem associated_one_of_associated_mul_one [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : a * b ~ᵤ 1 → a ~ᵤ 1
| ⟨u, h⟩ => associated_one_of_mul_eq_one (b * u) <| by simpa [mul_assoc] using h
#align associated_one_of_associated_mul_one associated_one_of_associated_mul_one
theorem associated_mul_unit_left {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) a :=
let ⟨u', hu⟩ := hu
⟨u'⁻¹, hu ▸ Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _⟩
#align associated_mul_unit_left associated_mul_unit_left
theorem associated_unit_mul_left {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) a := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu
#align associated_unit_mul_left associated_unit_mul_left
theorem associated_mul_unit_right {β : Type*} [Monoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (a * u) :=
(associated_mul_unit_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_mul_unit_right associated_mul_unit_right
theorem associated_unit_mul_right {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (a u : β) (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * a) :=
(associated_unit_mul_left a u hu).symm
#align associated_unit_mul_right associated_unit_mul_right
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
⟨(associated_mul_unit_right _ _ hu).trans, (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ hu).trans⟩
#align associated_mul_is_unit_left_iff associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {u a b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated (u * a) b ↔ Associated a b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu
#align associated_is_unit_mul_left_iff associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff
theorem associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b u : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_mul_is_unit_right_iff associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff
theorem associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a u b : β} (hu : IsUnit u) :
Associated a (u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
Associated.comm.trans <| (associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff hu).trans Associated.comm
#align associated_is_unit_mul_right_iff associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_left_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (a * u) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_left_iff associated_mul_unit_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_left_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated (↑u * a) b ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_left_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_left_iff associated_unit_mul_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_mul_unit_right_iff {β : Type*} [Monoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (b * u) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_mul_isUnit_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_mul_unit_right_iff associated_mul_unit_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem associated_unit_mul_right_iff {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] {a b : β} {u : Units β} :
Associated a (↑u * b) ↔ Associated a b :=
associated_isUnit_mul_right_iff u.isUnit
#align associated_unit_mul_right_iff associated_unit_mul_right_iff
theorem Associated.mul_left [Monoid α] (a : α) {b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a * b ~ᵤ a * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_left Associated.mul_left
theorem Associated.mul_right [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) (c : α) : a * c ~ᵤ b * c := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h; exact ⟨d, mul_right_comm _ _ _⟩
#align associated.mul_right Associated.mul_right
theorem Associated.mul_mul [CommMonoid α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
(h₁ : a₁ ~ᵤ b₁) (h₂ : a₂ ~ᵤ b₂) : a₁ * a₂ ~ᵤ b₁ * b₂ := (h₁.mul_right _).trans (h₂.mul_left _)
#align associated.mul_mul Associated.mul_mul
theorem Associated.pow_pow [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ^ n ~ᵤ b ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [Associated.refl]
convert h.mul_mul ih <;> rw [pow_succ']
#align associated.pow_pow Associated.pow_pow
protected theorem Associated.dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} : a ~ᵤ b → a ∣ b := fun ⟨u, hu⟩ =>
⟨u, hu.symm⟩
#align associated.dvd Associated.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd' [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : b ∣ a :=
h.symm.dvd
protected theorem Associated.dvd_dvd [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a :=
⟨h.dvd, h.symm.dvd⟩
#align associated.dvd_dvd Associated.dvd_dvd
theorem associated_of_dvd_dvd [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
a ~ᵤ b := by
rcases hab with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases hba with ⟨d, a_eq⟩
by_cases ha0 : a = 0
· simp_all
have hac0 : a * c ≠ 0 := by
intro con
rw [con, zero_mul] at a_eq
apply ha0 a_eq
have : a * (c * d) = a * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hcd : c * d = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ ha0 this
have : a * c * (d * c) = a * c * 1 := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← a_eq, mul_one]
have hdc : d * c = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hac0 this
exact ⟨⟨c, d, hcd, hdc⟩, rfl⟩
#align associated_of_dvd_dvd associated_of_dvd_dvd
theorem dvd_dvd_iff_associated [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} : a ∣ b ∧ b ∣ a ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => associated_of_dvd_dvd h1 h2, Associated.dvd_dvd⟩
#align dvd_dvd_iff_associated dvd_dvd_iff_associated
instance [CancelMonoidWithZero α] [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
DecidableRel ((· ~ᵤ ·) : α → α → Prop) := fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff _ dvd_dvd_iff_associated
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ∣ c ↔ b ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.mul_right_dvd.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_left
theorem Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right [Monoid α] {a b c : α} (h : b ~ᵤ c) : a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ c :=
let ⟨_, hu⟩ := h
hu ▸ Units.dvd_mul_right.symm
#align associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right Associated.dvd_iff_dvd_right
theorem Associated.eq_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [← Units.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq, zero_mul]
#align associated.eq_zero_iff Associated.eq_zero_iff
theorem Associated.ne_zero_iff [MonoidWithZero α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : a ≠ 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 :=
not_congr h.eq_zero_iff
#align associated.ne_zero_iff Associated.ne_zero_iff
theorem Associated.neg_left [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h; ⟨-u, by simp [hu]⟩
theorem Associated.neg_right [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated a (-b) :=
h.symm.neg_left.symm
theorem Associated.neg_neg [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a b : α} (h : Associated a b) :
Associated (-a) (-b) :=
h.neg_left.neg_right
protected theorem Associated.prime [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Prime p) :
Prime q :=
⟨h.ne_zero_iff.1 hp.ne_zero,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
⟨fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => hp.not_unit ⟨v * u⁻¹, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩,
hu ▸ by
simp only [IsUnit.mul_iff, Units.isUnit, and_true, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd]
intro a b
exact hp.dvd_or_dvd⟩⟩
#align associated.prime Associated.prime
theorem prime_mul_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {x y : α} :
Prime (x * y) ↔ (Prime x ∧ IsUnit y) ∨ (IsUnit x ∧ Prime y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases of_irreducible_mul h.irreducible with hx | hy
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, (associated_unit_mul_left y x hx).prime h⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨(associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).prime h, hy⟩
· rintro (⟨hx, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, hy⟩)
· exact (associated_mul_unit_left x y hy).symm.prime hx
· exact (associated_unit_mul_right y x hx).prime hy
@[simp]
lemma prime_pow_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} {n : ℕ} :
Prime (p ^ n) ↔ Prime p ∧ n = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, fun ⟨hp, hn⟩ ↦ by simpa [hn]⟩
suffices n = 1 by aesop
cases' n with n
· simp at hp
· rw [Nat.succ.injEq]
rw [pow_succ', prime_mul_iff] at hp
rcases hp with ⟨hp, hpn⟩ | ⟨hp, hpn⟩
· by_contra contra
rw [isUnit_pow_iff contra] at hpn
exact hp.not_unit hpn
· exfalso
exact hpn.not_unit (hp.pow n)
theorem Irreducible.dvd_iff [Monoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
y ∣ x ↔ IsUnit y ∨ Associated x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
obtain (h|h) := hx.isUnit_or_isUnit hz
· exact Or.inl h
· rw [hz]
exact Or.inr (associated_mul_unit_left _ _ h)
· rintro (hy|h)
· exact hy.dvd
· exact h.symm.dvd
theorem Irreducible.associated_of_dvd [Monoid α] {p q : α} (p_irr : Irreducible p)
(q_irr : Irreducible q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
((q_irr.dvd_iff.mp dvd).resolve_left p_irr.not_unit).symm
#align irreducible.associated_of_dvd Irreducible.associated_of_dvdₓ
theorem Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated [Monoid α] {p q : α}
(pp : Irreducible p) (qp : Irreducible q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
⟨Irreducible.associated_of_dvd pp qp, Associated.dvd⟩
#align irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated Irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated
theorem Prime.associated_of_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (p_prime : Prime p)
(q_prime : Prime q) (dvd : p ∣ q) : Associated p q :=
p_prime.irreducible.associated_of_dvd q_prime.irreducible dvd
#align prime.associated_of_dvd Prime.associated_of_dvd
theorem Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (pp : Prime p)
(qp : Prime q) : p ∣ q ↔ Associated p q :=
pp.irreducible.dvd_irreducible_iff_associated qp.irreducible
#align prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated
theorem Associated.prime_iff [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) : Prime p ↔ Prime q :=
⟨h.prime, h.symm.prime⟩
#align associated.prime_iff Associated.prime_iff
protected theorem Associated.isUnit [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a → IsUnit b :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => ⟨v * u, by simp [hv, hu.symm]⟩
#align associated.is_unit Associated.isUnit
theorem Associated.isUnit_iff [Monoid α] {a b : α} (h : a ~ᵤ b) : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b :=
⟨h.isUnit, h.symm.isUnit⟩
#align associated.is_unit_iff Associated.isUnit_iff
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd [Monoid α]
{x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) (hy : y ∣ x) : IsUnit y ↔ ¬ Associated x y :=
⟨fun hy hxy => hx.1 (hxy.symm.isUnit hy), (hx.dvd_iff.mp hy).resolve_right⟩
protected theorem Associated.irreducible [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) (hp : Irreducible p) :
Irreducible q :=
⟨mt h.symm.isUnit hp.1,
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
fun a b hab =>
have hpab : p = a * (b * (u⁻¹ : αˣ)) :=
calc
p = p * u * (u⁻¹ : αˣ) := by simp
_ = _ := by rw [hu]; simp [hab, mul_assoc]
(hp.isUnit_or_isUnit hpab).elim Or.inl fun ⟨v, hv⟩ => Or.inr ⟨v * u, by simp [hv]⟩⟩
#align associated.irreducible Associated.irreducible
protected theorem Associated.irreducible_iff [Monoid α] {p q : α} (h : p ~ᵤ q) :
Irreducible p ↔ Irreducible q :=
⟨h.irreducible, h.symm.irreducible⟩
#align associated.irreducible_iff Associated.irreducible_iff
theorem Associated.of_mul_left [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ~ᵤ c * d)
(h₁ : a ~ᵤ c) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b ~ᵤ d :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
let ⟨v, hv⟩ := Associated.symm h₁
⟨u * (v : αˣ),
mul_left_cancel₀ ha
(by
rw [← hv, mul_assoc c (v : α) d, mul_left_comm c, ← hu]
simp [hv.symm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm])⟩
#align associated.of_mul_left Associated.of_mul_left
theorem Associated.of_mul_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d : α} :
a * b ~ᵤ c * d → b ~ᵤ d → b ≠ 0 → a ~ᵤ c := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm c]; exact Associated.of_mul_left
#align associated.of_mul_right Associated.of_mul_right
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₁ : 0 < k₁) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ := by
have : p₁ ∣ p₂ ^ k₂ := by
rw [← h.dvd_iff_dvd_right]
apply dvd_pow_self _ hk₁.ne'
rw [← hp₁.dvd_prime_iff_associated hp₂]
exact hp₁.dvd_of_dvd_pow this
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime
theorem Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p₁ p₂ : α} {k₁ k₂ : ℕ}
(hp₁ : Prime p₁) (hp₂ : Prime p₂) (hk₂ : 0 < k₂) (h : p₁ ^ k₁ ~ᵤ p₂ ^ k₂) : p₁ ~ᵤ p₂ :=
(h.symm.of_pow_associated_of_prime hp₂ hp₁ hk₂).symm
#align associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime' Associated.of_pow_associated_of_prime'
lemma Irreducible.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
IsRelPrime p n ↔ ¬ p ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h contra ↦ hp.not_unit (h dvd_rfl contra), fun hpn d hdp hdn ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! hpn
suffices Associated p d from this.dvd.trans hdn
exact (hp.dvd_iff.mp hdp).resolve_left hpn
lemma Irreducible.dvd_or_isRelPrime [Monoid α] {p n : α} (hp : Irreducible p) :
p ∣ n ∨ IsRelPrime p n := Classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr hp.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd.2
abbrev Associates (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Type _ :=
Quotient (Associated.setoid α)
#align associates Associates
namespace Associates
open Associated
protected abbrev mk {α : Type*} [Monoid α] (a : α) : Associates α :=
⟦a⟧
#align associates.mk Associates.mk
instance [Monoid α] : Inhabited (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff_associated [Monoid α] {a b : α} : Associates.mk a = Associates.mk b ↔ a ~ᵤ b :=
Iff.intro Quotient.exact Quot.sound
#align associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated
theorem quotient_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : ⟦a⟧ = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.mk Setoid.r a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.quot_mk_eq_mk Associates.quot_mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem quot_out [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk (Quot.out a) = a := by
rw [← quot_mk_eq_mk, Quot.out_eq]
#align associates.quot_out Associates.quot_outₓ
theorem mk_quot_out [Monoid α] (a : α) : Quot.out (Associates.mk a) ~ᵤ a := by
rw [← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, Associates.quot_out]
theorem forall_associated [Monoid α] {p : Associates α → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a, p (Associates.mk a) :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ => h _) fun h a => Quotient.inductionOn a h
#align associates.forall_associated Associates.forall_associated
theorem mk_surjective [Monoid α] : Function.Surjective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
forall_associated.2 fun a => ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align associates.mk_surjective Associates.mk_surjective
instance [Monoid α] : One (Associates α) :=
⟨⟦1⟧⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_one [Monoid α] : Associates.mk (1 : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_one Associates.mk_one
theorem one_eq_mk_one [Monoid α] : (1 : Associates α) = Associates.mk 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.one_eq_mk_one Associates.one_eq_mk_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_one [Monoid α] {a : α} : Associates.mk a = 1 ↔ IsUnit a := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, associated_one_iff_isUnit]
instance [Monoid α] : Bot (Associates α) :=
⟨1⟩
theorem bot_eq_one [Monoid α] : (⊥ : Associates α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align associates.bot_eq_one Associates.bot_eq_one
theorem exists_rep [Monoid α] (a : Associates α) : ∃ a0 : α, Associates.mk a0 = a :=
Quot.exists_rep a
#align associates.exists_rep Associates.exists_rep
instance [Monoid α] [Subsingleton α] :
Unique (Associates α) where
default := 1
uniq := forall_associated.2 fun _ ↦ mk_eq_one.2 <| isUnit_of_subsingleton _
theorem mk_injective [Monoid α] [Unique (Units α)] : Function.Injective (@Associates.mk α _) :=
fun _ _ h => associated_iff_eq.mp (Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.mp h)
#align associates.mk_injective Associates.mk_injective
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
instance instMul : Mul (Associates α) :=
⟨Quotient.map₂ (· * ·) fun _ _ h₁ _ _ h₂ ↦ h₁.mul_mul h₂⟩
theorem mk_mul_mk {x y : α} : Associates.mk x * Associates.mk y = Associates.mk (x * y) :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_mul_mk Associates.mk_mul_mk
instance instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (Associates α) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_one a' := Quotient.inductionOn a' fun a => show ⟦a * 1⟧ = ⟦a⟧ by simp
one_mul a' := Quotient.inductionOn a' fun a => show ⟦1 * a⟧ = ⟦a⟧ by simp
mul_assoc a' b' c' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a' b' c' fun a b c =>
show ⟦a * b * c⟧ = ⟦a * (b * c)⟧ by rw [mul_assoc]
mul_comm a' b' :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a' b' fun a b => show ⟦a * b⟧ = ⟦b * a⟧ by rw [mul_comm]
instance instPreorder : Preorder (Associates α) where
le := Dvd.dvd
le_refl := dvd_refl
le_trans a b c := dvd_trans
protected def mkMonoidHom : α →* Associates α where
toFun := Associates.mk
map_one' := mk_one
map_mul' _ _ := mk_mul_mk
#align associates.mk_monoid_hom Associates.mkMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem mkMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : Associates.mkMonoidHom a = Associates.mk a :=
rfl
#align associates.mk_monoid_hom_apply Associates.mkMonoidHom_apply
theorem associated_map_mk {f : Associates α →* α} (hinv : Function.RightInverse f Associates.mk)
(a : α) : a ~ᵤ f (Associates.mk a) :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.1 (hinv (Associates.mk a)).symm
#align associates.associated_map_mk Associates.associated_map_mk
theorem mk_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : Associates.mk (a ^ n) = Associates.mk a ^ n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, pow_succ, Associates.mk_mul_mk.symm]
#align associates.mk_pow Associates.mk_pow
theorem dvd_eq_le : ((· ∣ ·) : Associates α → Associates α → Prop) = (· ≤ ·) :=
rfl
#align associates.dvd_eq_le Associates.dvd_eq_le
theorem mul_eq_one_iff {x y : Associates α} : x * y = 1 ↔ x = 1 ∧ y = 1 :=
Iff.intro
(Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun a b h =>
have : a * b ~ᵤ 1 := Quotient.exact h
⟨Quotient.sound <| associated_one_of_associated_mul_one this,
Quotient.sound <| associated_one_of_associated_mul_one <| by rwa [mul_comm] at this⟩)
(by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
#align associates.mul_eq_one_iff Associates.mul_eq_one_iff
theorem units_eq_one (u : (Associates α)ˣ) : u = 1 :=
Units.ext (mul_eq_one_iff.1 u.val_inv).1
#align associates.units_eq_one Associates.units_eq_one
instance uniqueUnits : Unique (Associates α)ˣ where
default := 1
uniq := Associates.units_eq_one
#align associates.unique_units Associates.uniqueUnits
@[simp]
theorem coe_unit_eq_one (u : (Associates α)ˣ) : (u : Associates α) = 1 := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align associates.coe_unit_eq_one Associates.coe_unit_eq_one
theorem isUnit_iff_eq_one (a : Associates α) : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ coe_unit_eq_one _) fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one
#align associates.is_unit_iff_eq_one Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one
theorem isUnit_iff_eq_bot {a : Associates α} : IsUnit a ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, bot_eq_one]
#align associates.is_unit_iff_eq_bot Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_bot
theorem isUnit_mk {a : α} : IsUnit (Associates.mk a) ↔ IsUnit a :=
calc
IsUnit (Associates.mk a) ↔ a ~ᵤ 1 := by
rw [isUnit_iff_eq_one, one_eq_mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
_ ↔ IsUnit a := associated_one_iff_isUnit
#align associates.is_unit_mk Associates.isUnit_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_dvd_mk {a b : α} : Associates.mk a ∣ Associates.mk b ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp only [dvd_def, mk_surjective.exists, mk_mul_mk, mk_eq_mk_iff_associated,
Associated.comm (x := b)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, u, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, mul_assoc ..⟩
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
use c
#align associates.mk_dvd_mk Associates.mk_dvd_mk
theorem dvd_of_mk_le_mk {a b : α} : Associates.mk a ≤ Associates.mk b → a ∣ b :=
mk_dvd_mk.mp
#align associates.dvd_of_mk_le_mk Associates.dvd_of_mk_le_mk
theorem mk_le_mk_of_dvd {a b : α} : a ∣ b → Associates.mk a ≤ Associates.mk b :=
mk_dvd_mk.mpr
#align associates.mk_le_mk_of_dvd Associates.mk_le_mk_of_dvd
theorem mk_le_mk_iff_dvd {a b : α} : Associates.mk a ≤ Associates.mk b ↔ a ∣ b := mk_dvd_mk
#align associates.mk_le_mk_iff_dvd_iff Associates.mk_le_mk_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-16")] alias mk_le_mk_iff_dvd_iff := mk_le_mk_iff_dvd
@[simp]
theorem isPrimal_mk {a : α} : IsPrimal (Associates.mk a) ↔ IsPrimal a := by
simp_rw [IsPrimal, forall_associated, mk_surjective.exists, mk_mul_mk, mk_dvd_mk]
constructor <;> intro h b c dvd <;> obtain ⟨a₁, a₂, h₁, h₂, eq⟩ := @h b c dvd
· obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.mp eq.symm
exact ⟨a₁, a₂ * u, h₁, Units.mul_right_dvd.mpr h₂, mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
· exact ⟨a₁, a₂, h₁, h₂, congr_arg _ eq⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-16")] alias isPrimal_iff := isPrimal_mk
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Associated.lean | 1,056 | 1,057 | theorem decompositionMonoid_iff : DecompositionMonoid (Associates α) ↔ DecompositionMonoid α := by |
simp_rw [_root_.decompositionMonoid_iff, forall_associated, isPrimal_mk]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
#align_import order.filter.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
protected def prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter (α × β) :=
f.comap Prod.fst ⊓ g.comap Prod.snd
#align filter.prod Filter.prod
instance instSProd : SProd (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter (α × β)) where
sprod := Filter.prod
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
#align filter.prod_mem_prod Filter.prod_mem_prod
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
#align filter.mem_prod_iff Filter.mem_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_mem_prod_iff Filter.prod_mem_prod_iff
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
#align filter.mem_prod_principal Filter.mem_prod_principal
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align filter.mem_prod_top Filter.mem_prod_top
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 101 | 104 | theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by |
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.Algebra.RingQuot
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorAlgebra.Basic
#align_import algebra.lie.universal_enveloping from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32b08ef840dd25ca2e47e035c5da03ce16d2dc3c"
universe u₁ u₂ u₃
variable (R : Type u₁) (L : Type u₂)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
local notation "ιₜ" => TensorAlgebra.ι R
def UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra :=
RingQuot (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.Rel R L)
#align universal_enveloping_algebra UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra
namespace UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra
-- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020): the next three
-- instances were derived automatically in mathlib3.
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (RingQuot (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.Rel R L)))
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.inhabited UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.instInhabited
instance instRing : Ring (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L) :=
inferInstanceAs (Ring (RingQuot (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.Rel R L)))
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.ring UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.instRing
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L) :=
inferInstanceAs (Algebra R (RingQuot (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.Rel R L)))
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.algebra UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.instAlgebra
def mkAlgHom : TensorAlgebra R L →ₐ[R] UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L :=
RingQuot.mkAlgHom R (Rel R L)
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.mk_alg_hom UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.mkAlgHom
variable {L}
@[simps!] -- Porting note (#11445): added
def ι : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L :=
{ (mkAlgHom R L).toLinearMap.comp ιₜ with
map_lie' := fun {x y} => by
suffices mkAlgHom R L (ιₜ ⁅x, y⁆ + ιₜ y * ιₜ x) = mkAlgHom R L (ιₜ x * ιₜ y) by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul] at this; simp [LieRing.of_associative_ring_bracket, ← this]
exact RingQuot.mkAlgHom_rel _ (Rel.lie_compat x y) }
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.ι UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.ι
variable {A : Type u₃} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (f : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ A)
def lift : (L →ₗ⁅R⁆ A) ≃ (UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₐ[R] A) where
toFun f :=
RingQuot.liftAlgHom R
⟨TensorAlgebra.lift R (f : L →ₗ[R] A), by
intro a b h; induction' h with x y
simp only [LieRing.of_associative_ring_bracket, map_add, TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply,
LieHom.coe_toLinearMap, LieHom.map_lie, map_mul, sub_add_cancel]⟩
invFun F := (F : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₗ⁅R⁆ A).comp (ι R)
left_inv f := by
ext
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [ι, mkAlgHom, TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply, LieHom.coe_toLinearMap,
-- LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp, LieHom.coe_comp, AlgHom.coe_toLieHom,
-- LieHom.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply,
-- RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply]
simp only [LieHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, AlgHom.coe_toLieHom,
UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.ι_apply, mkAlgHom]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply]
simp only [TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply, LieHom.coe_toLinearMap]
right_inv F := by
apply RingQuot.ringQuot_ext'
ext
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [ι, mkAlgHom, TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply, LieHom.coe_toLinearMap,
-- LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp, LieHom.coe_linearMap_comp,
-- AlgHom.comp_toLinearMap, Function.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply,
-- RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply, AlgHom.coe_toLieHom, LieHom.coe_mk]
-- extra `rfl` after leanprover/lean4#2644
simp [mkAlgHom]; rfl
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.lift UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₐ[R] A) :
(lift R).symm F = (F : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₗ⁅R⁆ A).comp (ι R) :=
rfl
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.lift_symm_apply UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.lift_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift : lift R f ∘ ι R = f :=
funext <| LieHom.ext_iff.mp <| (lift R).symm_apply_apply f
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.ι_comp_lift UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.ι_comp_lift
-- Porting note: moved `@[simp]` to the next theorem (LHS simplifies)
theorem lift_ι_apply (x : L) : lift R f (ι R x) = f x := by
rw [← Function.comp_apply (f := lift R f) (g := ι R) (x := x), ι_comp_lift]
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.lift_ι_apply UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.lift_ι_apply
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply' (x : L) :
lift R f ((UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.mkAlgHom R L) (ιₜ x)) = f x := by
simpa using lift_ι_apply R f x
theorem lift_unique (g : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₐ[R] A) : g ∘ ι R = f ↔ g = lift R f := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (lift R).symm_apply_eq
constructor <;> · intro h; ext; simp [← h]
#align universal_enveloping_algebra.lift_unique UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra.lift_unique
@[ext]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/UniversalEnveloping.lean | 164 | 170 | theorem hom_ext {g₁ g₂ : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₐ[R] A}
(h :
(g₁ : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₗ⁅R⁆ A).comp (ι R) =
(g₂ : UniversalEnvelopingAlgebra R L →ₗ⁅R⁆ A).comp (ι R)) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
have h' : (lift R).symm g₁ = (lift R).symm g₂ := by | ext; simp [h]
(lift R).symm.injective h'
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
#align_import analysis.calculus.extend_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Filter Set Metric ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped Topology
attribute [local mono] Set.prod_mono
theorem has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E} {f' : E →L[ℝ] F}
(f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (s_conv : Convex ℝ s) (s_open : IsOpen s)
(f_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s y)
(h : Tendsto (fun y => fderiv ℝ f y) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 f')) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (closure s) x := by
classical
-- one can assume without loss of generality that `x` belongs to the closure of `s`, as the
-- statement is empty otherwise
by_cases hx : x ∉ closure s
· rw [← closure_closure] at hx; exact hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure hx
push_neg at hx
rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff]
intro ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ y ∈ s, dist y x < δ → ‖fderiv ℝ f y - f'‖ < ε := by
simpa [dist_zero_right] using tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds.1 h ε ε_pos
set B := ball x δ
suffices ∀ y ∈ B ∩ closure s, ‖f y - f x - (f' y - f' x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖ from
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.2 ⟨δ, δ_pos, fun y hy => by simpa using this y hy⟩
suffices
∀ p : E × E,
p ∈ closure ((B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s)) → ‖f p.2 - f p.1 - (f' p.2 - f' p.1)‖ ≤ ε * ‖p.2 - p.1‖ by
rw [closure_prod_eq] at this
intro y y_in
apply this ⟨x, y⟩
have : B ∩ closure s ⊆ closure (B ∩ s) := isOpen_ball.inter_closure
exact ⟨this ⟨mem_ball_self δ_pos, hx⟩, this y_in⟩
have key : ∀ p : E × E, p ∈ (B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s) →
‖f p.2 - f p.1 - (f' p.2 - f' p.1)‖ ≤ ε * ‖p.2 - p.1‖ := by
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
have conv : Convex ℝ (B ∩ s) := (convex_ball _ _).inter s_conv
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (B ∩ s) := f_diff.mono inter_subset_right
have bound : ∀ z ∈ B ∩ s, ‖fderivWithin ℝ f (B ∩ s) z - f'‖ ≤ ε := by
intro z z_in
have h := hδ z
have : fderivWithin ℝ f (B ∩ s) z = fderiv ℝ f z := by
have op : IsOpen (B ∩ s) := isOpen_ball.inter s_open
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin _ (op.uniqueDiffOn z z_in)]
exact (diff z z_in).differentiableAt (IsOpen.mem_nhds op z_in)
rw [← this] at h
exact le_of_lt (h z_in.2 z_in.1)
simpa using conv.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le' diff bound u_in v_in
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ uv_in
have f_cont' : ∀ y ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt (f - ⇑f') s y := by
intro y y_in
exact Tendsto.sub (f_cont y y_in) f'.cont.continuousWithinAt
refine ContinuousWithinAt.closure_le uv_in ?_ ?_ key
all_goals
-- common start for both continuity proofs
have : (B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s) ⊆ s ×ˢ s := by mono <;> exact inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨u_in, v_in⟩ : u ∈ closure s ∧ v ∈ closure s := by
simpa [closure_prod_eq] using closure_mono this uv_in
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mono _ this
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt]
· rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
have : ∀ u v, f v - f u - (f' v - f' u) = f v - f' v - (f u - f' u) := by intros; abel
simp only [this]
exact
Tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuousAt
((Tendsto.comp (f_cont' v v_in) tendsto_snd).sub <|
Tendsto.comp (f_cont' u u_in) tendsto_fst)
· apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact
tendsto_const_nhds.mul
(Tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuousAt <| tendsto_snd.sub tendsto_fst)
#align has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv
theorem has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv {s : Set ℝ} {e : E} {a : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
(f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (f_lim : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[>] a)
(f_lim' : Tendsto (fun x => deriv f x) (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 e)) : HasDerivWithinAt f e (Ici a) a := by
obtain ⟨b, ab : a < b, sab : Ioc a b ⊆ s⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset.1 hs
let t := Ioo a b
have ts : t ⊆ s := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self sab
have t_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f t := f_diff.mono ts
have t_conv : Convex ℝ t := convex_Ioo a b
have t_open : IsOpen t := isOpen_Ioo
have t_closure : closure t = Icc a b := closure_Ioo ab.ne
have t_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure t, ContinuousWithinAt f t y := by
rw [t_closure]
intro y hy
by_cases h : y = a
· rw [h]; exact f_lim.mono ts
· have : y ∈ s := sab ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne hy.1 (Ne.symm h), hy.2⟩
exact (f_diff.continuousOn y this).mono ts
have t_diff' : Tendsto (fun x => fderiv ℝ f x) (𝓝[t] a) (𝓝 (smulRight (1 : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℝ) e)) := by
simp only [deriv_fderiv.symm]
exact Tendsto.comp
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight : IsBoundedBilinearMap ℝ _).continuous_right.continuousAt
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left Ioo_subset_Ioi_self f_lim')
-- now we can apply `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_differentiable`
have : HasDerivWithinAt f e (Icc a b) a := by
rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, ← t_closure]
exact has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv t_diff t_conv t_open t_cont t_diff'
exact this.mono_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici <| left_mem_Ico.2 ab)
#align has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
theorem has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv {s : Set ℝ} {e : E} {a : ℝ}
{f : ℝ → E} (f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (f_lim : ContinuousWithinAt f s a)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝[<] a) (f_lim' : Tendsto (fun x => deriv f x) (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 e)) :
HasDerivWithinAt f e (Iic a) a := by
obtain ⟨b, ba, sab⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Iio a, Ico b a ⊆ s := mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ico_subset.1 hs
let t := Ioo b a
have ts : t ⊆ s := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self sab
have t_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f t := f_diff.mono ts
have t_conv : Convex ℝ t := convex_Ioo b a
have t_open : IsOpen t := isOpen_Ioo
have t_closure : closure t = Icc b a := closure_Ioo (ne_of_lt ba)
have t_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure t, ContinuousWithinAt f t y := by
rw [t_closure]
intro y hy
by_cases h : y = a
· rw [h]; exact f_lim.mono ts
· have : y ∈ s := sab ⟨hy.1, lt_of_le_of_ne hy.2 h⟩
exact (f_diff.continuousOn y this).mono ts
have t_diff' : Tendsto (fun x => fderiv ℝ f x) (𝓝[t] a) (𝓝 (smulRight (1 : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℝ) e)) := by
simp only [deriv_fderiv.symm]
exact Tendsto.comp
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight : IsBoundedBilinearMap ℝ _).continuous_right.continuousAt
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left Ioo_subset_Iio_self f_lim')
-- now we can apply `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_differentiable`
have : HasDerivWithinAt f e (Icc b a) a := by
rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, ← t_closure]
exact has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv t_diff t_conv t_open t_cont t_diff'
exact this.mono_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic <| right_mem_Ioc.2 ba)
#align has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Extend.lean | 180 | 209 | theorem hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne {f g : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ}
(f_diff : ∀ y ≠ x, HasDerivAt f (g y) y) (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : HasDerivAt f (g x) x := by |
have A : HasDerivWithinAt f (g x) (Ici x) x := by
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioi x) := fun y hy =>
(f_diff y (ne_of_gt hy)).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
-- next line is the nontrivial bit of this proof, appealing to differentiability
-- extension results.
apply
has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv diff hf.continuousWithinAt
self_mem_nhdsWithin
have : Tendsto g (𝓝[>] x) (𝓝 (g x)) := tendsto_inf_left hg
apply this.congr' _
apply mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin fun y hy => _
intros y hy
exact (f_diff y (ne_of_gt hy)).deriv.symm
have B : HasDerivWithinAt f (g x) (Iic x) x := by
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Iio x) := fun y hy =>
(f_diff y (ne_of_lt hy)).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
-- next line is the nontrivial bit of this proof, appealing to differentiability
-- extension results.
apply
has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv diff hf.continuousWithinAt
self_mem_nhdsWithin
have : Tendsto g (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 (g x)) := tendsto_inf_left hg
apply this.congr' _
apply mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin fun y hy => _
intros y hy
exact (f_diff y (ne_of_lt hy)).deriv.symm
simpa using B.union A
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import algebra.gcd_monoid.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"550b58538991c8977703fdeb7c9d51a5aa27df11"
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note: mathlib3 had a `@[protect_proj]` here, but adding `protected` to all the fields
-- adds unnecessary clutter to later code
class NormalizationMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
normUnit : α → αˣ
normUnit_zero : normUnit 0 = 1
normUnit_mul : ∀ {a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → normUnit (a * b) = normUnit a * normUnit b
normUnit_coe_units : ∀ u : αˣ, normUnit u = u⁻¹
#align normalization_monoid NormalizationMonoid
export NormalizationMonoid (normUnit normUnit_zero normUnit_mul normUnit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] normUnit_coe_units normUnit_zero normUnit_mul
-- Porting note: mathlib3 had a `@[protect_proj]` here, but adding `protected` to all the fields
-- adds unnecessary clutter to later code
class GCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
gcd : α → α → α
lcm : α → α → α
gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a
gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b
dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b
gcd_mul_lcm : ∀ a b, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b)
lcm_zero_left : ∀ a, lcm 0 a = 0
lcm_zero_right : ∀ a, lcm a 0 = 0
#align gcd_monoid GCDMonoid
class NormalizedGCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] extends NormalizationMonoid α,
GCDMonoid α where
normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b
normalize_lcm : ∀ a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b
#align normalized_gcd_monoid NormalizedGCDMonoid
export GCDMonoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section GCDMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
instance [NormalizationMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [GCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
theorem gcd_isUnit_iff_isRelPrime [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} :
IsUnit (gcd a b) ↔ IsRelPrime a b :=
⟨fun h _ ha hb ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit (dvd_gcd ha hb) h, (· (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b))⟩
-- Porting note: lower priority to avoid linter complaints about simp-normal form
@[simp 1100]
theorem normalize_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd
#align normalize_gcd normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm [GCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b) :=
GCDMonoid.gcd_mul_lcm
#align gcd_mul_lcm gcd_mul_lcm
section GCD
theorem dvd_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _), h.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩) fun ⟨hab, hac⟩ =>
dvd_gcd hab hac
#align dvd_gcd_iff dvd_gcd_iff
theorem gcd_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
#align gcd_comm gcd_comm
theorem gcd_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (gcd a b) (gcd b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
#align gcd_comm' gcd_comm'
theorem gcd_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
#align gcd_assoc gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (gcd (gcd m n) k) (gcd m (gcd n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
#align gcd_assoc' gcd_assoc'
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) gcd where
comm := gcd_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) gcd where
assoc := gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) : gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
#align gcd_eq_normalize gcd_eq_normalize
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
#align gcd_zero_left gcd_zero_left
theorem gcd_zero_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 0 a) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
#align gcd_zero_left' gcd_zero_left'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
#align gcd_zero_right gcd_zero_right
theorem gcd_zero_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 0) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
#align gcd_zero_right' gcd_zero_right'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b
let ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b
rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => by
rw [ha, hb, ← zero_dvd_iff]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rfl
#align gcd_eq_zero_iff gcd_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
#align gcd_one_left gcd_one_left
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_left [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd 1 a) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
theorem gcd_one_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 1 a) 1 := by simp
#align gcd_one_left' gcd_one_left'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
#align gcd_one_right gcd_one_right
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_right [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd a 1) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem gcd_one_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 1) 1 := by simp
#align gcd_one_right' gcd_one_right'
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left _ _).trans hab) ((gcd_dvd_right _ _).trans hcd)
#align gcd_dvd_gcd gcd_dvd_gcd
protected theorem Associated.gcd [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (gcd a₁ b₁) (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd hb.dvd) (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem gcd_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
#align gcd_same gcd_same
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c) by simpa
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a
(show d ∣ gcd b c from
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)))
(dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _))
#align gcd_mul_left gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (a * b) (a * c)) (a * gcd b c) := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left']
obtain ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
apply associated_of_dvd_dvd
· rw [eq]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
exact
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _)
#align gcd_mul_left' gcd_mul_left'
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
#align gcd_mul_right gcd_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (b * a) (c * a)) (gcd b c * a) := by
simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left']
#align gcd_mul_right' gcd_mul_right'
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
#align gcd_eq_left_iff gcd_eq_left_iff
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a := by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
#align gcd_eq_right_iff gcd_eq_right_iff
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(gcd_dvd_gcd h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
#align associated.gcd_eq_left Associated.gcd_eq_left
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
#align associated.gcd_eq_right Associated.gcd_eq_right
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ gcd k m * n :=
(dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ n) H).trans (gcd_mul_right' n k m).dvd
#align dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ gcd k m * n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k m) dvd_rfl), dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n := by
rw [mul_comm] at H ⊢
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
#align dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ m * gcd k n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul dvd_rfl (gcd_dvd_right k n)), dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α)] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal k m n H := by
cases h
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at h0
rcases h0 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨0, n, dvd_refl 0, dvd_refl n, by simp⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left k m
refine ⟨gcd k m, a, gcd_dvd_right _ _, ?_, ha⟩
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← ha]
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd [GCDMonoid α] (k m n : α) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n := by
obtain ⟨m', n', hm', hn', h⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k (m * n))
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h
rw [h]
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _
apply mul_dvd_mul
· have hm'k : m' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_right m' n').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm'
· have hn'k : n' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_left n' m').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn'
#align gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd
theorem gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} :
gcd a (b ^ k) ∣ gcd a b ^ k := by
by_cases hg : gcd a b = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact
(gcd_zero_left' (0 ^ k : α)).dvd.trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_zero_left' (0 : α)).symm.dvd _)
· induction' k with k hk
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
exact (gcd_one_right' a).dvd
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ']
trans gcd a b * gcd a (b ^ k)
· exact gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd a b (b ^ k)
· exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hg).mpr hk
#align gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
theorem gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd a b ^ k :=
calc
gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd b (a ^ k) := (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd
_ ∣ gcd b a ^ k := gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
_ ∣ gcd a b ^ k := pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd _
#align gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
theorem pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d₁ d₂ : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) (hc : c = d₁ * d₂) (hd₁ : d₁ ∣ a) : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 ∧ d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
have h1 : IsUnit (gcd (d₁ ^ k) b) := by
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
trans gcd d₁ b ^ k
· exact gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
· apply IsUnit.dvd
apply IsUnit.pow
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
apply dvd_trans _ hab.dvd
apply gcd_dvd_gcd hd₁ (dvd_refl b)
have h2 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a * b := by
use d₂ ^ k
rw [h, hc]
exact mul_pow d₁ d₂ k
rw [mul_comm] at h2
have h3 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
apply (dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul h2).trans
rw [h1.mul_left_dvd]
have h4 : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro hdk
rw [hdk] at h3
apply absurd (zero_dvd_iff.mp h3) ha
exact ⟨h4, h3⟩
#align pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow
theorem exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, Associated (d ^ k) a := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· use 0
rw [Subsingleton.elim a (0 ^ k)]
by_cases ha : a = 0
· use 0
obtain rfl | hk := eq_or_ne k 0
· simp [ha] at h
· rw [ha, zero_pow hk]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· use 1
rw [one_pow]
apply (associated_one_iff_isUnit.mpr hab).symm.trans
rw [hb]
exact gcd_zero_right' a
obtain rfl | hk := k.eq_zero_or_pos
· use 1
rw [pow_zero] at h ⊢
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, one_mul]
have hc : c ∣ a * b := by
rw [h]
exact dvd_pow_self _ hk.ne'
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, hd₁, hd₂, hc⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul hc
use d₁
obtain ⟨h0₁, ⟨a', ha'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow ha hab h hc hd₁
rw [mul_comm] at h hc
rw [(gcd_comm' a b).isUnit_iff] at hab
obtain ⟨h0₂, ⟨b', hb'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow hb hab h hc hd₂
rw [ha', hb', hc, mul_pow] at h
have h' : a' * b' = 1 := by
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₁).mp
rw [mul_one]
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₂).mp
rw [← h]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm a', ← mul_assoc _ b', ← mul_assoc b', mul_comm b']
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h'
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, ha']
#align exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow
theorem exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] [Unique αˣ] {a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, a = d ^ k :=
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow hab h
⟨d, (associated_iff_eq.mp hd).symm⟩
#align exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow
theorem gcd_greatest {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
GCDMonoid.gcd a b = normalize d :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
gcd_eq_normalize h (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb)
#align gcd_greatest gcd_greatest
theorem gcd_greatest_associated {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
Associated d (GCDMonoid.gcd a b) :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
associated_of_dvd_dvd (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb) h
#align gcd_greatest_associated gcd_greatest_associated
theorem isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α]
{x y x' y' : α} (ex : x = gcd x y * x') (ey : y = gcd x y * y') (h : gcd x y ≠ 0) :
IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
refine Associated.of_mul_left ?_ (Associated.refl <| gcd x y) h
convert (gcd_mul_left' (gcd x y) x' y').symm using 1
rw [← ex, ← ey, mul_one]
#align is_unit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd
theorem extract_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] (x y : α) :
∃ x' y', x = gcd x y * x' ∧ y = gcd x y * y' ∧ IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
by_cases h : gcd x y = 0
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := (gcd_eq_zero_iff x y).1 h
simp_rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
exact ⟨1, 1, by rw [h, zero_mul], by rw [h, zero_mul], gcd_one_left' 1⟩
obtain ⟨x', ex⟩ := gcd_dvd_left x y
obtain ⟨y', ey⟩ := gcd_dvd_right x y
exact ⟨x', y', ex, ey, isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd ex ey h⟩
#align extract_gcd extract_gcd
theorem associated_gcd_left_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated x (gcd x y) ↔ x ∣ y :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd dvd_rfl hxy) (gcd_dvd_left x y)⟩
theorem associated_gcd_right_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated y (gcd x y) ↔ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd hxy dvd_rfl) (gcd_dvd_right x y)⟩
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
IsUnit (gcd x y) ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [hx.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left x y), not_iff_not, associated_gcd_left_iff]
theorem Irreducible.gcd_eq_one_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
gcd x y = 1 ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [← hx.isUnit_gcd_iff, ← normalize_eq_one, NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd]
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing α] [IsDomain α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
theorem gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b - c) : gcd a b = gcd a c := by
apply dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) <;>
rw [dvd_gcd_iff] <;>
refine ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨d, hd⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_right a b with ⟨e, he⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_left a b with ⟨f, hf⟩
use e - f * d
rw [mul_sub, ← he, ← mul_assoc, ← hf, ← hd, sub_sub_cancel]
· rcases h with ⟨d, hd⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_right a c with ⟨e, he⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_left a c with ⟨f, hf⟩
use e + f * d
rw [mul_add, ← he, ← mul_assoc, ← hf, ← hd, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm c b, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Basic.lean | 1,024 | 1,025 | theorem gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_left {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b - c) : gcd b a = gcd c a := by |
rw [gcd_comm _ a, gcd_comm _ a, gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import ring_theory.localization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b69c9a770ecf37eb21f7b8cf4fa00de3b62694ec"
open Function
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (M : Submonoid R) (S : Type*) [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommSemiring P]
@[mk_iff] class IsLocalization : Prop where
-- Porting note: add ' to fields, and made new versions of these with either `S` or `M` explicit.
map_units' : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (algebraMap R S y)
surj' : ∀ z : S, ∃ x : R × M, z * algebraMap R S x.2 = algebraMap R S x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ {x y}, algebraMap R S x = algebraMap R S y → ∃ c : M, ↑c * x = ↑c * y
#align is_localization IsLocalization
variable {M}
namespace IsLocalization
section IsLocalization
variable [IsLocalization M S]
section
@[inherit_doc IsLocalization.map_units']
theorem map_units : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (algebraMap R S y) :=
IsLocalization.map_units'
variable (M) {S}
@[inherit_doc IsLocalization.surj']
theorem surj : ∀ z : S, ∃ x : R × M, z * algebraMap R S x.2 = algebraMap R S x.1 :=
IsLocalization.surj'
variable (S)
@[inherit_doc IsLocalization.exists_of_eq]
theorem eq_iff_exists {x y} : algebraMap R S x = algebraMap R S y ↔ ∃ c : M, ↑c * x = ↑c * y :=
Iff.intro IsLocalization.exists_of_eq fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
apply_fun algebraMap R S at h
rw [map_mul, map_mul] at h
exact (IsLocalization.map_units S c).mul_right_inj.mp h
variable {S}
theorem of_le (N : Submonoid R) (h₁ : M ≤ N) (h₂ : ∀ r ∈ N, IsUnit (algebraMap R S r)) :
IsLocalization N S where
map_units' r := h₂ r r.2
surj' s :=
have ⟨⟨x, y, hy⟩, H⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M s
⟨⟨x, y, h₁ hy⟩, H⟩
exists_of_eq {x y} := by
rw [IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M]
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact ⟨⟨c, h₁ c.2⟩, hc⟩
#align is_localization.of_le IsLocalization.of_le
variable (S)
@[simps]
def toLocalizationWithZeroMap : Submonoid.LocalizationWithZeroMap M S where
__ := algebraMap R S
toFun := algebraMap R S
map_units' := IsLocalization.map_units _
surj' := IsLocalization.surj _
exists_of_eq _ _ := IsLocalization.exists_of_eq
#align is_localization.to_localization_with_zero_map IsLocalization.toLocalizationWithZeroMap
abbrev toLocalizationMap : Submonoid.LocalizationMap M S :=
(toLocalizationWithZeroMap M S).toLocalizationMap
#align is_localization.to_localization_map IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap
@[simp]
theorem toLocalizationMap_toMap : (toLocalizationMap M S).toMap = (algebraMap R S : R →*₀ S) :=
rfl
#align is_localization.to_localization_map_to_map IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap_toMap
theorem toLocalizationMap_toMap_apply (x) : (toLocalizationMap M S).toMap x = algebraMap R S x :=
rfl
#align is_localization.to_localization_map_to_map_apply IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap_toMap_apply
theorem surj₂ : ∀ z w : S, ∃ z' w' : R, ∃ d : M,
(z * algebraMap R S d = algebraMap R S z') ∧ (w * algebraMap R S d = algebraMap R S w') :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).surj₂
end
variable (M) {S}
noncomputable def sec (z : S) : R × M :=
Classical.choose <| IsLocalization.surj _ z
#align is_localization.sec IsLocalization.sec
@[simp]
theorem toLocalizationMap_sec : (toLocalizationMap M S).sec = sec M :=
rfl
#align is_localization.to_localization_map_sec IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap_sec
theorem sec_spec (z : S) :
z * algebraMap R S (IsLocalization.sec M z).2 = algebraMap R S (IsLocalization.sec M z).1 :=
Classical.choose_spec <| IsLocalization.surj _ z
#align is_localization.sec_spec IsLocalization.sec_spec
theorem sec_spec' (z : S) :
algebraMap R S (IsLocalization.sec M z).1 = algebraMap R S (IsLocalization.sec M z).2 * z := by
rw [mul_comm, sec_spec]
#align is_localization.sec_spec' IsLocalization.sec_spec'
variable {M}
theorem subsingleton (h : 0 ∈ M) : Subsingleton S := (toLocalizationMap M S).subsingleton h
theorem map_right_cancel {x y} {c : M} (h : algebraMap R S (c * x) = algebraMap R S (c * y)) :
algebraMap R S x = algebraMap R S y :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).map_right_cancel h
#align is_localization.map_right_cancel IsLocalization.map_right_cancel
theorem map_left_cancel {x y} {c : M} (h : algebraMap R S (x * c) = algebraMap R S (y * c)) :
algebraMap R S x = algebraMap R S y :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).map_left_cancel h
#align is_localization.map_left_cancel IsLocalization.map_left_cancel
theorem eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero {z x} {y : M} (h : z * algebraMap R S y = algebraMap R S x)
(hx : x = 0) : z = 0 := by
rw [hx, (algebraMap R S).map_zero] at h
exact (IsUnit.mul_left_eq_zero (IsLocalization.map_units S y)).1 h
#align is_localization.eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero IsLocalization.eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero
variable (M S)
theorem map_eq_zero_iff (r : R) : algebraMap R S r = 0 ↔ ∃ m : M, ↑m * r = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := (IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S).mp ((algebraMap R S).map_zero.trans h.symm)
exact ⟨m, by simpa using hm.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨m, hm⟩
rw [← (IsLocalization.map_units S m).mul_right_inj, mul_zero, ← RingHom.map_mul, hm,
RingHom.map_zero]
#align is_localization.map_eq_zero_iff IsLocalization.map_eq_zero_iff
variable {M}
noncomputable def mk' (x : R) (y : M) : S :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk' x y
#align is_localization.mk' IsLocalization.mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_sec (z : S) : mk' S (IsLocalization.sec M z).1 (IsLocalization.sec M z).2 = z :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_sec _
#align is_localization.mk'_sec IsLocalization.mk'_sec
theorem mk'_mul (x₁ x₂ : R) (y₁ y₂ : M) : mk' S (x₁ * x₂) (y₁ * y₂) = mk' S x₁ y₁ * mk' S x₂ y₂ :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_mul _ _ _ _
#align is_localization.mk'_mul IsLocalization.mk'_mul
theorem mk'_one (x) : mk' S x (1 : M) = algebraMap R S x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_one _
#align is_localization.mk'_one IsLocalization.mk'_one
@[simp]
theorem mk'_spec (x) (y : M) : mk' S x y * algebraMap R S y = algebraMap R S x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_spec _ _
#align is_localization.mk'_spec IsLocalization.mk'_spec
@[simp]
theorem mk'_spec' (x) (y : M) : algebraMap R S y * mk' S x y = algebraMap R S x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_spec' _ _
#align is_localization.mk'_spec' IsLocalization.mk'_spec'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_spec_mk (x) (y : R) (hy : y ∈ M) :
mk' S x ⟨y, hy⟩ * algebraMap R S y = algebraMap R S x :=
mk'_spec S x ⟨y, hy⟩
#align is_localization.mk'_spec_mk IsLocalization.mk'_spec_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk'_spec'_mk (x) (y : R) (hy : y ∈ M) :
algebraMap R S y * mk' S x ⟨y, hy⟩ = algebraMap R S x :=
mk'_spec' S x ⟨y, hy⟩
#align is_localization.mk'_spec'_mk IsLocalization.mk'_spec'_mk
variable {S}
theorem eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq {x} {y : M} {z} :
z = mk' S x y ↔ z * algebraMap R S y = algebraMap R S x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq
#align is_localization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq IsLocalization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul {x} {y : M} {z} :
mk' S x y = z ↔ algebraMap R S x = z * algebraMap R S y :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align is_localization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul
theorem mk'_add_eq_iff_add_mul_eq_mul {x} {y : M} {z₁ z₂} :
mk' S x y + z₁ = z₂ ↔ algebraMap R S x + z₁ * algebraMap R S y = z₂ * algebraMap R S y := by
rw [← mk'_spec S x y, ← IsUnit.mul_left_inj (IsLocalization.map_units S y), right_distrib]
#align is_localization.mk'_add_eq_iff_add_mul_eq_mul IsLocalization.mk'_add_eq_iff_add_mul_eq_mul
variable (M)
theorem mk'_surjective (z : S) : ∃ (x : _) (y : M), mk' S x y = z :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := IsLocalization.surj _ z
⟨r.1, r.2, (eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq.2 hr).symm⟩
#align is_localization.mk'_surjective IsLocalization.mk'_surjective
variable (S)
noncomputable def fintype' [Fintype R] : Fintype S :=
have := Classical.propDecidable
Fintype.ofSurjective (Function.uncurry <| IsLocalization.mk' S) fun a =>
Prod.exists'.mpr <| IsLocalization.mk'_surjective M a
#align is_localization.fintype' IsLocalization.fintype'
variable {M S}
def uniqueOfZeroMem (h : (0 : R) ∈ M) : Unique S :=
uniqueOfZeroEqOne <| by simpa using IsLocalization.map_units S ⟨0, h⟩
#align is_localization.unique_of_zero_mem IsLocalization.uniqueOfZeroMem
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : M} :
mk' S x₁ y₁ = mk' S x₂ y₂ ↔ algebraMap R S (y₂ * x₁) = algebraMap R S (y₁ * x₂) :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_eq_iff_eq
#align is_localization.mk'_eq_iff_eq IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq' {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : M} :
mk' S x₁ y₁ = mk' S x₂ y₂ ↔ algebraMap R S (x₁ * y₂) = algebraMap R S (x₂ * y₁) :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_eq_iff_eq'
#align is_localization.mk'_eq_iff_eq' IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
theorem mk'_mem_iff {x} {y : M} {I : Ideal S} : mk' S x y ∈ I ↔ algebraMap R S x ∈ I := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← mk'_spec S x y, mul_comm]
exact I.mul_mem_left ((algebraMap R S) y) h
· rw [← mk'_spec S x y] at h
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv.1 (map_units S y)
have := I.mul_mem_left b h
rwa [mul_comm, mul_assoc, hb, mul_one] at this
#align is_localization.mk'_mem_iff IsLocalization.mk'_mem_iff
protected theorem eq {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : M} :
mk' S a₁ a₂ = mk' S b₁ b₂ ↔ ∃ c : M, ↑c * (↑b₂ * a₁) = c * (a₂ * b₁) :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).eq
#align is_localization.eq IsLocalization.eq
theorem mk'_eq_zero_iff (x : R) (s : M) : mk' S x s = 0 ↔ ∃ m : M, ↑m * x = 0 := by
rw [← (map_units S s).mul_left_inj, mk'_spec, zero_mul, map_eq_zero_iff M]
#align is_localization.mk'_eq_zero_iff IsLocalization.mk'_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk'_zero (s : M) : IsLocalization.mk' S 0 s = 0 := by
rw [eq_comm, IsLocalization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, zero_mul, map_zero]
#align is_localization.mk'_zero IsLocalization.mk'_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_mk'_ne_zero {x : R} {y : M} (hxy : IsLocalization.mk' S x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact hxy (IsLocalization.mk'_zero _)
#align is_localization.ne_zero_of_mk'_ne_zero IsLocalization.ne_zero_of_mk'_ne_zero
theorem mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul (x y : R) (z : M) :
(algebraMap R S) x * mk' S y z = mk' S (x * y) z :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul _ _ _
#align is_localization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul
theorem mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one (x : R) (y : M) : mk' S x y = (algebraMap R S) x * mk' S 1 y :=
((toLocalizationMap M S).mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' _ _).symm
#align is_localization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one
@[simp]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_left (x : R) (y : M) : mk' S (y * x : R) y = (algebraMap R S) x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_mul_cancel_left _ _
#align is_localization.mk'_mul_cancel_left IsLocalization.mk'_mul_cancel_left
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_right (x : R) (y : M) : mk' S (x * y) y = (algebraMap R S) x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).mk'_mul_cancel_right _ _
#align is_localization.mk'_mul_cancel_right IsLocalization.mk'_mul_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one (x y : M) : mk' S (x : R) y * mk' S (y : R) x = 1 := by
rw [← mk'_mul, mul_comm]; exact mk'_self _ _
#align is_localization.mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one IsLocalization.mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one
theorem mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one' (x : R) (y : M) (h : x ∈ M) : mk' S x y * mk' S (y : R) ⟨x, h⟩ = 1 :=
mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one ⟨x, h⟩ _
#align is_localization.mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one' IsLocalization.mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one'
theorem smul_mk' (x y : R) (m : M) : x • mk' S y m = mk' S (x * y) m := by
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul m]
rw [mk'_mul, mk'_one, Algebra.smul_def]
@[simp] theorem smul_mk'_one (x : R) (m : M) : x • mk' S 1 m = mk' S x m := by
rw [smul_mk', mul_one]
@[simp] lemma smul_mk'_self {m : M} {r : R} :
(m : R) • mk' S r m = algebraMap R S r := by
rw [smul_mk', mk'_mul_cancel_left]
@[simps]
instance invertible_mk'_one (s : M) : Invertible (IsLocalization.mk' S (1 : R) s) where
invOf := algebraMap R S s
invOf_mul_self := by simp
mul_invOf_self := by simp
section
variable (M)
theorem isUnit_comp (j : S →+* P) (y : M) : IsUnit (j.comp (algebraMap R S) y) :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).isUnit_comp j.toMonoidHom _
#align is_localization.is_unit_comp IsLocalization.isUnit_comp
end
theorem eq_of_eq {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y)) {x y}
(h : (algebraMap R S) x = (algebraMap R S) y) : g x = g y :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq (toLocalizationMap M S) (g := g.toMonoidHom) hg h
#align is_localization.eq_of_eq IsLocalization.eq_of_eq
theorem mk'_add (x₁ x₂ : R) (y₁ y₂ : M) :
mk' S (x₁ * y₂ + x₂ * y₁) (y₁ * y₂) = mk' S x₁ y₁ + mk' S x₂ y₂ :=
mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <|
Eq.symm
(by
rw [mul_comm (_ + _), mul_add, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mk'_add_eq_iff_add_mul_eq_mul,
mul_comm (_ * _), ← mul_assoc, add_comm, ← map_mul, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul,
mk'_add_eq_iff_add_mul_eq_mul]
simp only [map_add, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul]
ring)
#align is_localization.mk'_add IsLocalization.mk'_add
theorem mul_add_inv_left {g : R →+* P} (h : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y)) (y : M) (w z₁ z₂ : P) :
w * ↑(IsUnit.liftRight (g.toMonoidHom.restrict M) h y)⁻¹ + z₁ =
z₂ ↔ w + g y * z₁ = g y * z₂ := by
rw [mul_comm, ← one_mul z₁, ← Units.inv_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (g.toMonoidHom.restrict M) h y),
mul_assoc, ← mul_add, Units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, Units.inv_mul_cancel_left,
IsUnit.coe_liftRight]
simp [RingHom.toMonoidHom_eq_coe, MonoidHom.restrict_apply]
#align is_localization.mul_add_inv_left IsLocalization.mul_add_inv_left
theorem lift_spec_mul_add {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y)) (z w w' v) :
((toLocalizationWithZeroMap M S).lift g.toMonoidWithZeroHom hg) z * w + w' = v ↔
g ((toLocalizationMap M S).sec z).1 * w + g ((toLocalizationMap M S).sec z).2 * w' =
g ((toLocalizationMap M S).sec z).2 * v := by
erw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, mul_add_inv_left hg, mul_comm]
rfl
#align is_localization.lift_spec_mul_add IsLocalization.lift_spec_mul_add
noncomputable def lift {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y)) : S →+* P :=
{ Submonoid.LocalizationWithZeroMap.lift (toLocalizationWithZeroMap M S)
g.toMonoidWithZeroHom hg with
map_add' := by
intro x y
erw [(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_spec, mul_add, mul_comm, eq_comm, lift_spec_mul_add,
add_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc, lift_spec_mul_add]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
show g _ * g _ * g _ + g _ * g _ * g _ = g _ * g _ * g _
simp_rw [← map_mul g, ← map_add g]
apply eq_of_eq (S := S) hg
simp only [sec_spec', toLocalizationMap_sec, map_add, map_mul]
ring }
#align is_localization.lift IsLocalization.lift
variable {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y))
theorem lift_mk' (x y) :
lift hg (mk' S x y) = g x * ↑(IsUnit.liftRight (g.toMonoidHom.restrict M) hg y)⁻¹ :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_mk' _ _ _
#align is_localization.lift_mk' IsLocalization.lift_mk'
theorem lift_mk'_spec (x v) (y : M) : lift hg (mk' S x y) = v ↔ g x = g y * v :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_mk'_spec _ _ _ _
#align is_localization.lift_mk'_spec IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq (x : R) : lift hg ((algebraMap R S) x) = g x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_eq _ _
#align is_localization.lift_eq IsLocalization.lift_eq
theorem lift_eq_iff {x y : R × M} :
lift hg (mk' S x.1 x.2) = lift hg (mk' S y.1 y.2) ↔ g (x.1 * y.2) = g (y.1 * x.2) :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_eq_iff _
#align is_localization.lift_eq_iff IsLocalization.lift_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp : (lift hg).comp (algebraMap R S) = g :=
RingHom.ext <| (DFunLike.ext_iff (F := MonoidHom _ _)).1 <| (toLocalizationMap M S).lift_comp _
#align is_localization.lift_comp IsLocalization.lift_comp
@[simp]
theorem lift_of_comp (j : S →+* P) : lift (isUnit_comp M j) = j :=
RingHom.ext <| (DFunLike.ext_iff (F := MonoidHom _ _)).1 <|
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_of_comp j.toMonoidHom
#align is_localization.lift_of_comp IsLocalization.lift_of_comp
variable (M)
theorem monoidHom_ext ⦃j k : S →* P⦄
(h : j.comp (algebraMap R S : R →* S) = k.comp (algebraMap R S)) : j = k :=
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap (toLocalizationMap M S) <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
#align is_localization.monoid_hom_ext IsLocalization.monoidHom_ext
theorem ringHom_ext ⦃j k : S →+* P⦄ (h : j.comp (algebraMap R S) = k.comp (algebraMap R S)) :
j = k :=
RingHom.coe_monoidHom_injective <| monoidHom_ext M <| MonoidHom.ext <| RingHom.congr_fun h
#align is_localization.ring_hom_ext IsLocalization.ringHom_ext
theorem algHom_subsingleton [Algebra R P] : Subsingleton (S →ₐ[R] P) :=
⟨fun f g =>
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective <|
IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M <| by rw [f.comp_algebraMap, g.comp_algebraMap]⟩
#align is_localization.alg_hom_subsingleton IsLocalization.algHom_subsingleton
protected theorem ext (j k : S → P) (hj1 : j 1 = 1) (hk1 : k 1 = 1)
(hjm : ∀ a b, j (a * b) = j a * j b) (hkm : ∀ a b, k (a * b) = k a * k b)
(h : ∀ a, j (algebraMap R S a) = k (algebraMap R S a)) : j = k :=
let j' : MonoidHom S P :=
{ toFun := j, map_one' := hj1, map_mul' := hjm }
let k' : MonoidHom S P :=
{ toFun := k, map_one' := hk1, map_mul' := hkm }
have : j' = k' := monoidHom_ext M (MonoidHom.ext h)
show j'.toFun = k'.toFun by rw [this]
#align is_localization.ext IsLocalization.ext
variable {M}
theorem lift_unique {j : S →+* P} (hj : ∀ x, j ((algebraMap R S) x) = g x) : lift hg = j :=
RingHom.ext <|
(DFunLike.ext_iff (F := MonoidHom _ _)).1 <|
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_unique (toLocalizationMap M S) (g := g.toMonoidHom) hg
(j := j.toMonoidHom) hj
#align is_localization.lift_unique IsLocalization.lift_unique
@[simp]
theorem lift_id (x) : lift (map_units S : ∀ _ : M, IsUnit _) x = x :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_id _
#align is_localization.lift_id IsLocalization.lift_id
theorem lift_surjective_iff :
Surjective (lift hg : S → P) ↔ ∀ v : P, ∃ x : R × M, v * g x.2 = g x.1 :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_surjective_iff hg
#align is_localization.lift_surjective_iff IsLocalization.lift_surjective_iff
theorem lift_injective_iff :
Injective (lift hg : S → P) ↔ ∀ x y, algebraMap R S x = algebraMap R S y ↔ g x = g y :=
(toLocalizationMap M S).lift_injective_iff hg
#align is_localization.lift_injective_iff IsLocalization.lift_injective_iff
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
section
instance instUniqueLocalization [Subsingleton R] : Unique (Localization M) where
uniq a := show a = mk 1 1 from
Localization.induction_on a fun _ => by
congr <;> apply Subsingleton.elim
protected irreducible_def add (z w : Localization M) : Localization M :=
Localization.liftOn₂ z w (fun a b c d => mk ((b : R) * c + d * a) (b * d))
fun {a a' b b' c c' d d'} h1 h2 =>
mk_eq_mk_iff.2
(by
rw [r_eq_r'] at h1 h2 ⊢
cases' h1 with t₅ ht₅
cases' h2 with t₆ ht₆
use t₅ * t₆
dsimp only
calc ↑t₅ * ↑t₆ * (↑b' * ↑d' * ((b : R) * c + d * a))
_ = t₆ * (d' * c) * (t₅ * (b' * b)) + t₅ * (b' * a) * (t₆ * (d' * d)) := by ring
_ = t₅ * t₆ * (b * d * (b' * c' + d' * a')) := by rw [ht₆, ht₅]; ring
)
#align localization.add Localization.add
instance : Add (Localization M) :=
⟨Localization.add⟩
theorem add_mk (a b c d) : (mk a b : Localization M) + mk c d =
mk ((b : R) * c + (d : R) * a) (b * d) := by
show Localization.add (mk a b) (mk c d) = mk _ _
simp [Localization.add_def]
#align localization.add_mk Localization.add_mk
theorem add_mk_self (a b c) : (mk a b : Localization M) + mk c b = mk (a + c) b := by
rw [add_mk, mk_eq_mk_iff, r_eq_r']
refine (r' M).symm ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp only [Submonoid.coe_one, Submonoid.coe_mul]
ring
#align localization.add_mk_self Localization.add_mk_self
local macro "localization_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ intros
simp only [add_mk, Localization.mk_mul, ← Localization.mk_zero 1]
refine mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr (r_of_eq ?_)
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul]
ring })
instance : CommSemiring (Localization M) :=
{ (show CommMonoidWithZero (Localization M) by infer_instance) with
add := (· + ·)
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := fun x =>
Localization.induction_on x fun x => by simp only [smul_mk, zero_nsmul, mk_zero]
nsmul_succ := fun n x =>
Localization.induction_on x fun x => by simp only [smul_mk, succ_nsmul, add_mk_self]
add_assoc := fun m n k =>
Localization.induction_on₃ m n k
(by localization_tac)
zero_add := fun y =>
Localization.induction_on y
(by localization_tac)
add_zero := fun y =>
Localization.induction_on y
(by localization_tac)
add_comm := fun y z =>
Localization.induction_on₂ z y
(by localization_tac)
left_distrib := fun m n k =>
Localization.induction_on₃ m n k
(by localization_tac)
right_distrib := fun m n k =>
Localization.induction_on₃ m n k
(by localization_tac) }
@[simps]
def mkAddMonoidHom (b : M) : R →+ Localization M where
toFun a := mk a b
map_zero' := mk_zero _
map_add' _ _ := (add_mk_self _ _ _).symm
#align localization.mk_add_monoid_hom Localization.mkAddMonoidHom
theorem mk_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R) (s : Finset ι) (b : M) :
mk (∑ i ∈ s, f i) b = ∑ i ∈ s, mk (f i) b :=
map_sum (mkAddMonoidHom b) f s
#align localization.mk_sum Localization.mk_sum
theorem mk_list_sum (l : List R) (b : M) : mk l.sum b = (l.map fun a => mk a b).sum :=
map_list_sum (mkAddMonoidHom b) l
#align localization.mk_list_sum Localization.mk_list_sum
theorem mk_multiset_sum (l : Multiset R) (b : M) : mk l.sum b = (l.map fun a => mk a b).sum :=
(mkAddMonoidHom b).map_multiset_sum l
#align localization.mk_multiset_sum Localization.mk_multiset_sum
instance {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
DistribMulAction S (Localization M) where
smul_zero s := by simp only [← Localization.mk_zero 1, Localization.smul_mk, smul_zero]
smul_add s x y :=
Localization.induction_on₂ x y <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ =>
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ => by
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, Localization.add_mk, smul_add, mul_comm _ (s • _),
mul_comm _ r₁, mul_comm _ r₂, smul_mul_assoc]
instance {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [MulSemiringAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
MulSemiringAction S (Localization M) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (MulDistribMulAction S (Localization M)),
inferInstanceAs (DistribMulAction S (Localization M)) with }
instance {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : Module S (Localization M) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DistribMulAction S (Localization M)) with
zero_smul :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, zero_smul, mk_zero]
add_smul := fun s₁ s₂ =>
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, add_smul, add_mk_self] }
instance algebra {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S (Localization M) where
toRingHom :=
RingHom.comp
{ Localization.monoidOf M with
toFun := (monoidOf M).toMap
map_zero' := by rw [← mk_zero (1 : M), mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk]
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, add_mk, Submonoid.coe_one, one_mul, add_comm] }
(algebraMap S R)
smul_def' s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intro r x
dsimp
simp only [← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, mk_mul, Localization.smul_mk, one_mul,
Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intro r x
dsimp
simp only [← mk_one_eq_monoidOf_mk, mk_mul, Localization.smul_mk, one_mul, mul_one,
Algebra.commutes]
instance isLocalization : IsLocalization M (Localization M) where
map_units' := (Localization.monoidOf M).map_units
surj' := (Localization.monoidOf M).surj
exists_of_eq := (Localization.monoidOf M).eq_iff_exists.mp
end
@[simp]
theorem toLocalizationMap_eq_monoidOf : toLocalizationMap M (Localization M) = monoidOf M :=
rfl
#align localization.to_localization_map_eq_monoid_of Localization.toLocalizationMap_eq_monoidOf
theorem monoidOf_eq_algebraMap (x) : (monoidOf M).toMap x = algebraMap R (Localization M) x :=
rfl
#align localization.monoid_of_eq_algebra_map Localization.monoidOf_eq_algebraMap
theorem mk_one_eq_algebraMap (x) : mk x 1 = algebraMap R (Localization M) x :=
rfl
#align localization.mk_one_eq_algebra_map Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap
theorem mk_eq_mk'_apply (x y) : mk x y = IsLocalization.mk' (Localization M) x y := by
rw [mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'_apply, mk', toLocalizationMap_eq_monoidOf]
#align localization.mk_eq_mk'_apply Localization.mk_eq_mk'_apply
-- Porting note: removed `simp`. Left hand side can be simplified; not clear what normal form should
--be.
theorem mk_eq_mk' : (mk : R → M → Localization M) = IsLocalization.mk' (Localization M) :=
mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'
#align localization.mk_eq_mk' Localization.mk_eq_mk'
theorem mk_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra A R] (m : A) :
mk (algebraMap A R m) 1 = algebraMap A (Localization M) m := by
rw [mk_eq_mk', mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul, Submonoid.coe_one, map_one, mul_one]; rfl
#align localization.mk_algebra_map Localization.mk_algebraMap
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean | 1,095 | 1,096 | theorem mk_natCast (m : ℕ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by |
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℕ) _
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PurelyInseparable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PerfectClosure
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
def pNilradical (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) : Ideal R := if 1 < p then nilradical R else ⊥
theorem pNilradical_le_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} :
pNilradical R p ≤ nilradical R := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
simp_rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp, bot_le]
theorem pNilradical_eq_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := by rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬ 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := by rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot' {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≤ 1) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := pNilradical_eq_bot (not_lt.2 hp)
theorem pNilradical_prime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := pNilradical_eq_nilradical hp.one_lt
theorem pNilradical_one {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] :
pNilradical R 1 = ⊥ := pNilradical_eq_bot' rfl.le
theorem mem_pNilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} {x : R} :
x ∈ pNilradical R p ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ p ^ n = 0 := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical_eq_nilradical hp]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨n, ?_⟩, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨p ^ n, h⟩⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel ((Nat.lt_pow_self hp n).le), pow_add, h, mul_zero]
rw [pNilradical_eq_bot hp, Ideal.mem_bot]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨0, by rw [pow_zero, pow_one, h]⟩, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
rcases Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 (not_lt.1 hp) with hp | hp
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rwa [hn, pow_zero, pow_one] at h
rw [hp, zero_pow hn, pow_zero] at h
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h.symm
exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
rwa [hp, one_pow, pow_one] at h
theorem sub_mem_pNilradical_iff_pow_expChar_pow_eq {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} [ExpChar R p]
{x y : R} : x - y ∈ pNilradical R p ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ p ^ n = y ^ p ^ n := by
simp_rw [mem_pNilradical, sub_pow_expChar_pow, sub_eq_zero]
theorem pow_expChar_pow_inj_of_pNilradical_eq_bot (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
(h : pNilradical R p = ⊥) (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun x : R ↦ x ^ p ^ n := fun _ _ H ↦
sub_eq_zero.1 <| Ideal.mem_bot.1 <| h ▸ sub_mem_pNilradical_iff_pow_expChar_pow_eq.2 ⟨n, H⟩
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot_of_frobenius_inj (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
(h : Function.Injective (frobenius R p)) : pNilradical R p = ⊥ := bot_unique fun x ↦ by
rw [mem_pNilradical, Ideal.mem_bot]
exact fun ⟨n, _⟩ ↦ h.iterate n (by rwa [← coe_iterateFrobenius, map_zero])
theorem PerfectRing.pNilradical_eq_bot (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
[PerfectRing R p] : pNilradical R p = ⊥ :=
pNilradical_eq_bot_of_frobenius_inj R p (injective_frobenius R p)
section IsPerfectClosure
variable {K L M N : Type*}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring K] [CommSemiring L] [CommSemiring M]
(i : K →+* L) (j : K →+* M) (f : L →+* M)
(p : ℕ) [ExpChar K p] [ExpChar L p] [ExpChar M p]
@[mk_iff]
class IsPRadical : Prop where
pow_mem' : ∀ x : L, ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : K), i y = x ^ p ^ n
ker_le' : RingHom.ker i ≤ pNilradical K p
theorem IsPRadical.pow_mem [IsPRadical i p] (x : L) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : K), i y = x ^ p ^ n := pow_mem' x
theorem IsPRadical.ker_le [IsPRadical i p] :
RingHom.ker i ≤ pNilradical K p := ker_le'
theorem IsPRadical.comap_pNilradical [IsPRadical i p] :
(pNilradical L p).comap i = pNilradical K p := by
refine le_antisymm (fun x h ↦ mem_pNilradical.2 ?_) (fun x h ↦ ?_)
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 <| Ideal.mem_comap.1 h
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 <| ker_le i p ((map_pow i x _).symm ▸ h)
exact ⟨n + m, by rwa [pow_add, pow_mul]⟩
simp only [Ideal.mem_comap, mem_pNilradical] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨n, by simpa only [map_pow, map_zero] using congr(i $h)⟩
variable (K) in
instance IsPRadical.of_id : IsPRadical (RingHom.id K) p where
pow_mem' x := ⟨0, x, by simp⟩
ker_le' x h := by convert Ideal.zero_mem _
theorem IsPRadical.trans [IsPRadical i p] [IsPRadical f p] :
IsPRadical (f.comp i) p where
pow_mem' x := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hy⟩ := pow_mem f p x
obtain ⟨m, z, hz⟩ := pow_mem i p y
exact ⟨n + m, z, by rw [RingHom.comp_apply, hz, map_pow, hy, pow_add, pow_mul]⟩
ker_le' x h := by
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.comp_apply, ← RingHom.mem_ker] at h
simpa only [← Ideal.mem_comap, comap_pNilradical] using ker_le f p h
@[nolint unusedArguments]
abbrev IsPerfectClosure [PerfectRing L p] := IsPRadical i p
theorem RingHom.pNilradical_le_ker_of_perfectRing [PerfectRing L p] :
pNilradical K p ≤ RingHom.ker i := fun x h ↦ by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 h
replace h := congr((iterateFrobeniusEquiv L p n).symm (i $h))
rwa [map_pow, ← iterateFrobenius_def, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
map_zero, map_zero] at h
theorem IsPerfectClosure.ker_eq [PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p] :
RingHom.ker i = pNilradical K p :=
IsPRadical.ker_le'.antisymm (i.pNilradical_le_ker_of_perfectRing p)
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [CommRing L] [CommRing M] [CommRing N]
(i : K →+* L) (j : K →+* M) (k : K →+* N) (f : L →+* M) (g : L →+* N)
(p : ℕ) [ExpChar K p] [ExpChar L p] [ExpChar M p] [ExpChar N p]
namespace PerfectRing
variable [PerfectRing M p] [IsPRadical i p]
theorem liftAux_apply (x : L) (n : ℕ) (y : K) (h : i y = x ^ p ^ n) :
liftAux i j p x = (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p n).symm (j y) := by
rw [liftAux]
have h' := Classical.choose_spec (lift_aux i p x)
set n' := (Classical.choose (lift_aux i p x)).1
replace h := congr($(h.symm) ^ p ^ n')
rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, ← h', ← map_pow, ← map_pow, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub,
← RingHom.mem_ker] at h
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 (IsPRadical.ker_le i p h)
refine (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p (m + n + n')).injective ?_
conv_lhs => rw [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n n', ← add_assoc,
iterateFrobeniusEquiv_add_apply (m := m + n'), RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply,
iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def,
← sub_eq_zero, ← map_pow, ← map_pow, ← map_sub,
add_comm m, add_comm m, pow_add, pow_mul, pow_add, pow_mul, ← sub_pow_expChar_pow, h, map_zero]
def lift : L →+* M where
toFun := liftAux i j p
map_one' := by simp [liftAux_apply i j p 1 0 1 (by rw [one_pow, map_one])]
map_mul' x1 x2 := by
obtain ⟨n1, y1, h1⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x1
obtain ⟨n2, y2, h2⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x2
simp only; rw [liftAux_apply i j p _ _ _ h1, liftAux_apply i j p _ _ _ h2,
liftAux_apply i j p (x1 * x2) (n1 + n2) (y1 ^ p ^ n2 * y2 ^ p ^ n1) (by rw [map_mul,
map_pow, map_pow, h1, h2, ← pow_mul, ← pow_add, ← pow_mul, ← pow_add,
add_comm n2, mul_pow]),
map_mul, map_pow, map_pow, map_mul, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def]
nth_rw 1 [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply]
rw [RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply, add_comm n1, iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply,
← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
map_zero' := by simp [liftAux_apply i j p 0 0 0 (by rw [pow_zero, pow_one, map_zero])]
map_add' x1 x2 := by
obtain ⟨n1, y1, h1⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x1
obtain ⟨n2, y2, h2⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x2
simp only; rw [liftAux_apply i j p _ _ _ h1, liftAux_apply i j p _ _ _ h2,
liftAux_apply i j p (x1 + x2) (n1 + n2) (y1 ^ p ^ n2 + y2 ^ p ^ n1) (by rw [map_add,
map_pow, map_pow, h1, h2, ← pow_mul, ← pow_add, ← pow_mul, ← pow_add,
add_comm n2, add_pow_expChar_pow]),
map_add, map_pow, map_pow, map_add, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def]
nth_rw 1 [iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply]
rw [RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply, add_comm n1, iterateFrobeniusEquiv_symm_add_apply,
← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_def, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem lift_apply (x : L) (n : ℕ) (y : K) (h : i y = x ^ p ^ n) :
lift i j p x = (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p n).symm (j y) :=
liftAux_apply i j p _ _ _ h
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_apply (x : K) : lift i j p (i x) = j x := by
rw [lift_apply i j p _ 0 x (by rw [pow_zero, pow_one]), iterateFrobeniusEquiv_zero]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp : (lift i j p).comp i = j := RingHom.ext (lift_comp_apply i j p)
theorem lift_self_apply [PerfectRing L p] (x : L) : lift i i p x = x := liftAux_self_apply i p x
@[simp]
theorem lift_self [PerfectRing L p] : lift i i p = RingHom.id L :=
RingHom.ext (liftAux_self_apply i p)
theorem lift_id_apply (x : K) : lift (RingHom.id K) j p x = j x := liftAux_id_apply j p x
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : lift (RingHom.id K) j p = j := RingHom.ext (liftAux_id_apply j p)
@[simp]
theorem comp_lift : lift i (f.comp i) p = f :=
IsPRadical.injective_comp_of_perfect _ i p (lift_comp i _ p)
theorem comp_lift_apply (x : L) : lift i (f.comp i) p x = f x := congr($(comp_lift i f p) x)
variable (M) in
def liftEquiv : (K →+* M) ≃ (L →+* M) where
toFun j := lift i j p
invFun f := f.comp i
left_inv f := lift_comp i f p
right_inv f := comp_lift i f p
theorem liftEquiv_apply : liftEquiv M i p j = lift i j p := rfl
theorem liftEquiv_symm_apply : (liftEquiv M i p).symm f = f.comp i := rfl
theorem liftEquiv_id_apply : liftEquiv M (RingHom.id K) p j = j :=
lift_id j p
@[simp]
theorem liftEquiv_id : liftEquiv M (RingHom.id K) p = Equiv.refl _ :=
Equiv.ext (liftEquiv_id_apply · p)
namespace IsPerfectClosure
variable [PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p] [PerfectRing M p] [IsPerfectClosure j p]
def equiv : L ≃+* M where
__ := PerfectRing.lift i j p
invFun := PerfectRing.liftAux j i p
left_inv := PerfectRing.lift_comp_lift_apply_eq_self i j p
right_inv := PerfectRing.lift_comp_lift_apply_eq_self j i p
theorem equiv_toRingHom : (equiv i j p).toRingHom = PerfectRing.lift i j p := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equiv_symm : (equiv i j p).symm = equiv j i p := rfl
theorem equiv_symm_toRingHom :
(equiv i j p).symm.toRingHom = PerfectRing.lift j i p := rfl
theorem equiv_apply (x : L) (n : ℕ) (y : K) (h : i y = x ^ p ^ n) :
equiv i j p x = (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p n).symm (j y) :=
PerfectRing.liftAux_apply i j p _ _ _ h
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsPerfectClosure.lean | 457 | 459 | theorem equiv_symm_apply (x : M) (n : ℕ) (y : K) (h : j y = x ^ p ^ n) :
(equiv i j p).symm x = (iterateFrobeniusEquiv L p n).symm (i y) := by |
rw [equiv_symm, equiv_apply j i p _ _ _ h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import data.nat.part_enat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
open Part hiding some
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
#align part_enat PartENat
namespace PartENat
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
#align part_enat.some PartENat.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_some PartENat.dom_some
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm x y := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add x := Part.ext' (true_and_iff _) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero x := Part.ext' (and_true_iff _) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc x y z := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (true_and_iff _).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.some_eq_coe PartENat.some_eq_natCast
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
#align part_enat.coe_inj PartENat.natCast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_coe PartENat.dom_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Sup PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
#align part_enat.le_def PartENat.le_def
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
#align part_enat.cases_on' PartENat.casesOn'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
#align part_enat.cases_on PartENat.casesOn
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (false_and_iff _) fun h => h.left.elim
#align part_enat.top_add PartENat.top_add
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
#align part_enat.add_top PartENat.add_top
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
#align part_enat.coe_get PartENat.natCast_get
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_coe' PartENat.get_natCast'
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
#align part_enat.get_coe PartENat.get_natCast
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_add_get PartENat.coe_add_get
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_add PartENat.get_add
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_zero PartENat.get_zero
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_one PartENat.get_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom) :
Part.get (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) h = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x)) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_some PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_of_dom PartENat.dom_of_le_of_dom
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_some PartENat.dom_of_le_some
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_coe PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by rw [le_def])
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
#align part_enat.decidable_le PartENat.decidableLe
-- Porting note: Removed. Use `Nat.castAddMonoidHom` instead.
#noalign part_enat.coe_hom
#noalign part_enat.coe_coe_hom
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
#align part_enat.lt_def PartENat.lt_def
noncomputable instance orderedAddCommMonoid : OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder, PartENat.addCommMonoid with
add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
#align part_enat.semilattice_sup PartENat.semilatticeSup
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
#align part_enat.order_bot PartENat.orderBot
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
#align part_enat.order_top PartENat.orderTop
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
#align part_enat.coe_le_coe PartENat.coe_le_coe
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
#align part_enat.coe_lt_coe PartENat.coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_le_get PartENat.get_le_get
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
#align part_enat.le_coe_iff PartENat.le_coe_iff
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_iff PartENat.lt_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_le_iff PartENat.coe_le_iff
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_lt_iff PartENat.coe_lt_iff
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
#align part_enat.eq_zero_iff PartENat.eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
#align part_enat.ne_zero_iff PartENat.ne_zero_iff
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
#align part_enat.dom_of_lt PartENat.dom_of_lt
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
#align part_enat.top_eq_none PartENat.top_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
#align part_enat.coe_lt_top PartENat.natCast_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.coe_ne_top PartENat.natCast_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.not_is_max_coe PartENat.not_isMax_natCast
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff PartENat.ne_top_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff_dom PartENat.ne_top_iff_dom
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
#align part_enat.not_dom_iff_eq_top PartENat.not_dom_iff_eq_top
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
#align part_enat.ne_top_of_lt PartENat.ne_top_of_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_le PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_le
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [iff_true_iff, le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
#align part_enat.pos_iff_one_le PartENat.pos_iff_one_le
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
-- Porting note: was `max_def := @sup_eq_maxDefault _ _ (id _) _ }`
max_def := fun a b => by
change (fun a b => a ⊔ b) a b = _
rw [@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (id _) _]
rfl }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup, PartENat.orderBot,
PartENat.orderedAddCommMonoid with
le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun a =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
#align part_enat.eq_coe_sub_of_add_eq_coe PartENat.eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
-- Porting note: was apply_mod_cast natCast_lt_top
norm_cast; apply natCast_lt_top
norm_cast at h
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h`
norm_cast; apply add_lt_add_right h
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_right PartENat.add_lt_add_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_right PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_left PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
#align part_enat.lt_add_iff_pos_right PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
#align part_enat.lt_add_one PartENat.lt_add_one
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.le_of_lt_add_one PartENat.le_of_lt_add_one
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_of_lt PartENat.add_one_le_of_lt
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_of_succ_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_iff_lt PartENat.add_one_le_iff_lt
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
#align part_enat.coe_succ_le_succ_iff PartENat.coe_succ_le_iff
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_succ_of_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.lt_add_one_iff_lt PartENat.lt_add_one_iff_lt
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le PartENat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
#align part_enat.add_eq_top_iff PartENat.add_eq_top_iff
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
#align part_enat.add_right_cancel_iff PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
#align part_enat.add_left_cancel_iff PartENat.add_left_cancel_iff
section WithTop
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
#align part_enat.to_with_top PartENat.toWithTop
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top PartENat.toWithTop_top
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top' PartENat.toWithTop_top'
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero PartENat.toWithTop_zero
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero' PartENat.toWithTop_zero'
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_some PartENat.toWithTop_some
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
#align part_enat.to_with_top_coe PartENat.toWithTop_natCast
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 628 | 630 | theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by |
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
|
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_symm_diff toDual_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_bihimp ofDual_bihimp
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
#align symm_diff_comm symmDiff_comm
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
#align symm_diff_is_comm symmDiff_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
#align symm_diff_self symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_bot symmDiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
#align bot_symm_diff bot_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
#align symm_diff_eq_bot symmDiff_eq_bot
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_le symmDiff_of_le
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_ge symmDiff_of_ge
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
#align symm_diff_le symmDiff_le
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align symm_diff_le_iff symmDiff_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
#align symm_diff_le_sup symmDiff_le_sup
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.symm_diff_eq_sup Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff symmDiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_inf symmDiff_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
#align symm_diff_sdiff_eq_sup symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_eq_sup sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
#align symm_diff_sup_inf symmDiff_sup_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align inf_sup_symm_diff inf_sup_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align symm_diff_symm_diff_inf symmDiff_symmDiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
#align inf_symm_diff_symm_diff inf_symmDiff_symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_triangle symmDiff_triangle
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 218 | 219 | theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by |
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
|
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
theorem Icc_bot_top [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] : Icc (⊥ : α) ⊤ = univ := by simp
#align set.Icc_bot_top Set.Icc_bot_top
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c d : α}
theorem not_mem_Ici : c ∉ Ici a ↔ c < a :=
not_le
#align set.not_mem_Ici Set.not_mem_Ici
theorem not_mem_Iic : c ∉ Iic b ↔ b < c :=
not_le
#align set.not_mem_Iic Set.not_mem_Iic
theorem not_mem_Ioi : c ∉ Ioi a ↔ c ≤ a :=
not_lt
#align set.not_mem_Ioi Set.not_mem_Ioi
theorem not_mem_Iio : c ∉ Iio b ↔ b ≤ c :=
not_lt
#align set.not_mem_Iio Set.not_mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem compl_Iic : (Iic a)ᶜ = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => not_le
#align set.compl_Iic Set.compl_Iic
@[simp]
theorem compl_Ici : (Ici a)ᶜ = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => not_le
#align set.compl_Ici Set.compl_Ici
@[simp]
theorem compl_Iio : (Iio a)ᶜ = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => not_lt
#align set.compl_Iio Set.compl_Iio
@[simp]
theorem compl_Ioi : (Ioi a)ᶜ = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => not_lt
#align set.compl_Ioi Set.compl_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ici : Ici a \ Ici b = Ico a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ici, Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ici Set.Ici_diff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi : Ici a \ Ioi b = Icc a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ioi, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ici_diff_Ioi Set.Ici_diff_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_diff_Ioi : Ioi a \ Ioi b = Ioc a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ioi, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Ioi_diff_Ioi Set.Ioi_diff_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_diff_Ici : Ioi a \ Ici b = Ioo a b := by rw [diff_eq, compl_Ici, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.Ioi_diff_Ici Set.Ioi_diff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iic : Iic b \ Iic a = Ioc a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iic, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iic Set.Iic_diff_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iio_diff_Iic : Iio b \ Iic a = Ioo a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iic, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.Iio_diff_Iic Set.Iio_diff_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio : Iic b \ Iio a = Icc a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iio, inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.Iic_diff_Iio Set.Iic_diff_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iio_diff_Iio : Iio b \ Iio a = Ico a b := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_Iio, inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.Iio_diff_Iio Set.Iio_diff_Iio
theorem Ioi_injective : Injective (Ioi : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_gt_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Ioi_injective Set.Ioi_injective
theorem Iio_injective : Injective (Iio : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_lt_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
#align set.Iio_injective Set.Iio_injective
theorem Ioi_inj : Ioi a = Ioi b ↔ a = b :=
Ioi_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Ioi_inj Set.Ioi_inj
theorem Iio_inj : Iio a = Iio b ↔ a = b :=
Iio_injective.eq_iff
#align set.Iio_inj Set.Iio_inj
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
have : a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ a₁ < b₂ := h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩
⟨this.1, le_of_not_lt fun h' => lt_irrefl b₂ (h ⟨this.2.le, h'⟩).2⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Ico_subset_Ico h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff Set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ ∧ a₂ ≤ a₁ := by
convert @Ico_subset_Ico_iff αᵒᵈ _ b₁ b₂ a₁ a₂ h₁ using 2 <;> exact (@dual_Ico α _ _ _).symm
#align set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff [DenselyOrdered α] (h₁ : a₁ < b₁) :
Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases exists_between h₁ with ⟨x, xa, xb⟩
constructor <;> refine le_of_not_lt fun h' => ?_
· have ab := (h ⟨xa, xb⟩).1.trans xb
exact lt_irrefl _ (h ⟨h', ab⟩).1
· have ab := xa.trans (h ⟨xa, xb⟩).2
exact lt_irrefl _ (h ⟨ab, h'⟩).2,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Ioo_subset_Ioo h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Ico_eq_Ico_iff (h : a₁ < b₁ ∨ a₂ < b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ = Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
⟨fun e => by
simp only [Subset.antisymm_iff] at e
simp only [le_antisymm_iff]
cases' h with h h <;>
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_lt, ge_iff_le, Ico_subset_Ico_iff h] at e <;>
[ rcases e with ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, e'⟩; rcases e with ⟨e', ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩ ] <;>
-- Porting note: restore `tauto`
have hab := (Ico_subset_Ico_iff <| h₁.trans_lt <| h.trans_le h₂).1 e' <;>
[ exact ⟨⟨hab.left, h₁⟩, ⟨h₂, hab.right⟩⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, hab.left⟩, ⟨hab.right, h₂⟩⟩ ],
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by rw [h₁, h₂]⟩
#align set.Ico_eq_Ico_iff Set.Ico_eq_Ico_iff
lemma Ici_eq_singleton_iff_isTop {x : α} : (Ici x = {x}) ↔ IsTop x := by
refine ⟨fun h y ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by ext y; simp [(h y).ge_iff_eq]⟩
by_contra! H
have : y ∈ Ici x := H.le
rw [h, mem_singleton_iff] at this
exact lt_irrefl y (this.le.trans_lt H)
open scoped Classical
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a ↔ a ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Ioi_subset_Ioi h⟩
by_contra ba
exact lt_irrefl _ (h (not_le.mp ba))
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a ↔ a ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Ioi_subset_Ici h⟩
by_contra ba
obtain ⟨c, bc, ca⟩ : ∃ c, b < c ∧ c < a := exists_between (not_le.mp ba)
exact lt_irrefl _ (ca.trans_le (h bc))
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ici_iff Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_iff
@[simp]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio_iff : Iio a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Iio_subset_Iio h⟩
by_contra ab
exact lt_irrefl _ (h (not_le.mp ab))
#align set.Iio_subset_Iio_iff Set.Iio_subset_Iio_iff
@[simp]
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Iio a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← diff_eq_empty, Iio_diff_Iic, Ioo_eq_empty_iff, not_lt]
#align set.Iio_subset_Iic_iff Set.Iio_subset_Iic_iff
theorem Iic_union_Ioi_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Iic b ∪ Ioi a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.lt_or_le x).symm
#align set.Iic_union_Ioi_of_le Set.Iic_union_Ioi_of_le
theorem Iio_union_Ici_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Iio b ∪ Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.le_or_lt x).symm
#align set.Iio_union_Ici_of_le Set.Iio_union_Ici_of_le
theorem Iic_union_Ici_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : Iic b ∪ Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.le_or_le x).symm
#align set.Iic_union_Ici_of_le Set.Iic_union_Ici_of_le
theorem Iio_union_Ioi_of_lt (h : a < b) : Iio b ∪ Ioi a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x => (h.lt_or_lt x).symm
#align set.Iio_union_Ioi_of_lt Set.Iio_union_Ioi_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Iic_union_Ici : Iic a ∪ Ici a = univ :=
Iic_union_Ici_of_le le_rfl
#align set.Iic_union_Ici Set.Iic_union_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iio_union_Ici : Iio a ∪ Ici a = univ :=
Iio_union_Ici_of_le le_rfl
#align set.Iio_union_Ici Set.Iio_union_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_union_Ioi : Iic a ∪ Ioi a = univ :=
Iic_union_Ioi_of_le le_rfl
#align set.Iic_union_Ioi Set.Iic_union_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Iio_union_Ioi : Iio a ∪ Ioi a = {a}ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => lt_or_lt_iff_ne
#align set.Iio_union_Ioi Set.Iio_union_Ioi
theorem Ioo_union_Ioi' (h₁ : c < b) : Ioo a b ∪ Ioi c = Ioi (min a c) := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_Ioo, mem_Ioi, min_lt_iff]
by_cases hc : c < x
· simp only [hc, or_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
· have hxb : x < b := (le_of_not_gt hc).trans_lt h₁
simp only [hxb, and_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
#align set.Ioo_union_Ioi' Set.Ioo_union_Ioi'
theorem Ioo_union_Ioi (h : c < max a b) : Ioo a b ∪ Ioi c = Ioi (min a c) := by
rcases le_total a b with hab | hab <;> simp [hab] at h
· exact Ioo_union_Ioi' h
· rw [min_comm]
simp [*, min_eq_left_of_lt]
#align set.Ioo_union_Ioi Set.Ioo_union_Ioi
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioo_union_Ici : Ioi a ⊆ Ioo a b ∪ Ici b := fun x hx =>
(lt_or_le x b).elim (fun hxb => Or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) fun hxb => Or.inr hxb
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioo_union_Ici Set.Ioi_subset_Ioo_union_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ Ici b = Ioi a :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => hx.elim And.left h.trans_le) Ioi_subset_Ioo_union_Ici
#align set.Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi Set.Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi
theorem Ici_subset_Ico_union_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ico a b ∪ Ici b := fun x hx =>
(lt_or_le x b).elim (fun hxb => Or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) fun hxb => Or.inr hxb
#align set.Ici_subset_Ico_union_Ici Set.Ici_subset_Ico_union_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ico_union_Ici_eq_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ Ici b = Ici a :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => hx.elim And.left h.trans) Ici_subset_Ico_union_Ici
#align set.Ico_union_Ici_eq_Ici Set.Ico_union_Ici_eq_Ici
theorem Ico_union_Ici' (h₁ : c ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ Ici c = Ici (min a c) := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_Ico, mem_Ici, min_le_iff]
by_cases hc : c ≤ x
· simp only [hc, or_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
· have hxb : x < b := (lt_of_not_ge hc).trans_le h₁
simp only [hxb, and_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
#align set.Ico_union_Ici' Set.Ico_union_Ici'
theorem Ico_union_Ici (h : c ≤ max a b) : Ico a b ∪ Ici c = Ici (min a c) := by
rcases le_total a b with hab | hab <;> simp [hab] at h
· exact Ico_union_Ici' h
· simp [*]
#align set.Ico_union_Ici Set.Ico_union_Ici
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioc_union_Ioi : Ioi a ⊆ Ioc a b ∪ Ioi b := fun x hx =>
(le_or_lt x b).elim (fun hxb => Or.inl ⟨hx, hxb⟩) fun hxb => Or.inr hxb
#align set.Ioi_subset_Ioc_union_Ioi Set.Ioi_subset_Ioc_union_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ Ioi b = Ioi a :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => hx.elim And.left h.trans_lt) Ioi_subset_Ioc_union_Ioi
#align set.Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi Set.Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi
theorem Ioc_union_Ioi' (h₁ : c ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ Ioi c = Ioi (min a c) := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_Ioc, mem_Ioi, min_lt_iff]
by_cases hc : c < x
· simp only [hc, or_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
· have hxb : x ≤ b := (le_of_not_gt hc).trans h₁
simp only [hxb, and_true] -- Porting note: restore `tauto`
#align set.Ioc_union_Ioi' Set.Ioc_union_Ioi'
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 1,351 | 1,354 | theorem Ioc_union_Ioi (h : c ≤ max a b) : Ioc a b ∪ Ioi c = Ioi (min a c) := by |
rcases le_total a b with hab | hab <;> simp [hab] at h
· exact Ioc_union_Ioi' h
· simp [*]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.gauge from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"373b03b5b9d0486534edbe94747f23cb3712f93d"
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
#align gauge gauge
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
#align gauge_def gauge_def
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
#align gauge_def' gauge_def'
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
#align absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
#align gauge_mono gauge_mono
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
#align exists_lt_of_gauge_lt exists_lt_of_gauge_lt
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
#align gauge_zero gauge_zero
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
#align gauge_zero' gauge_zero'
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
#align gauge_empty gauge_empty
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
#align gauge_of_subset_zero gauge_of_subset_zero
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ fun _ hx => hx.1.le
#align gauge_nonneg gauge_nonneg
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
#align gauge_neg gauge_neg
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
#align gauge_neg_set_neg gauge_neg_set_neg
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
#align gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
#align gauge_le_of_mem gauge_le_of_mem
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
#align gauge_le_eq gauge_le_eq
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
#align gauge_lt_eq' gauge_lt_eq'
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
#align gauge_lt_eq gauge_lt_eq
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
#align gauge_lt_one_subset_self gauge_lt_one_subset_self
theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
#align gauge_le_one_of_mem gauge_le_one_of_mem
theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by
refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha', x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s x) (half_pos hε))
obtain ⟨b, hb, hb', y, hy, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s y) (half_pos hε))
calc
gauge s (a • x + b • y) ≤ a + b := gauge_le_of_mem (by positivity) <| by
rw [hs.add_smul ha.le hb.le]
exact add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
_ < gauge s (a • x) + gauge s (b • y) + ε := by linarith
#align gauge_add_le gauge_add_le
theorem self_subset_gauge_le_one : s ⊆ { x | gauge s x ≤ 1 } := fun _ => gauge_le_one_of_mem
#align self_subset_gauge_le_one self_subset_gauge_le_one
theorem Convex.gauge_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
Convex ℝ { x | gauge s x ≤ a } := by
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a
· rw [gauge_le_eq hs h₀ absorbs ha]
exact convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter fun _ => hs.smul _
· -- Porting note: `convert` needed help
convert convex_empty (𝕜 := ℝ) (E := E)
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => ha <| (gauge_nonneg _).trans hx
#align convex.gauge_le Convex.gauge_le
theorem Balanced.starConvex (hs : Balanced ℝ s) : StarConvex ℝ 0 s :=
starConvex_zero_iff.2 fun x hx a ha₀ ha₁ =>
hs _ (by rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg ha₀]) (smul_mem_smul_set hx)
#align balanced.star_convex Balanced.starConvex
theorem le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₀ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ a • s) :
a ≤ gauge s x := by
rw [starConvex_zero_iff] at hs₀
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := hs₂.exists_pos
refine le_csInf ⟨r, hr, singleton_subset_iff.1 <| h _ (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le).ge⟩ ?_
rintro b ⟨hb, x, hx', rfl⟩
refine not_lt.1 fun hba => hx ?_
have ha := hb.trans hba
refine ⟨(a⁻¹ * b) • x, hs₀ hx' (by positivity) ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le hba.le ha.le
· dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ ha.ne']
#align le_gauge_of_not_mem le_gauge_of_not_mem
theorem one_le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₁ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ s) :
1 ≤ gauge s x :=
le_gauge_of_not_mem hs₁ hs₂ <| by rwa [one_smul]
#align one_le_gauge_of_not_mem one_le_gauge_of_not_mem
open Filter
section ContinuousSMul
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E]
open Filter in
theorem interior_subset_gauge_lt_one (s : Set E) : interior s ⊆ { x | gauge s x < 1 } := by
intro x hx
have H₁ : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ ↦ r⁻¹ • x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 ((1 : ℝ)⁻¹ • x)) :=
((tendsto_id.inv₀ one_ne_zero).smul tendsto_const_nhds).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [inv_one, one_smul] at H₁
have H₂ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[<] (1 : ℝ), x ∈ r • s ∧ 0 < r ∧ r < 1 := by
filter_upwards [H₁ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hx), Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' one_pos]
intro r h₁ h₂
exact ⟨(mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ h₂.1.ne' _ _).2 h₁, h₂⟩
rcases H₂.exists with ⟨r, hxr, hr₀, hr₁⟩
exact (gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hxr).trans_lt hr₁
#align interior_subset_gauge_lt_one interior_subset_gauge_lt_one
theorem gauge_lt_one_eq_self_of_isOpen (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } = s := by
refine (gauge_lt_one_subset_self hs₁ ‹_› <| absorbent_nhds_zero <| hs₂.mem_nhds hs₀).antisymm ?_
convert interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s
exact hs₂.interior_eq.symm
#align gauge_lt_one_eq_self_of_open gauge_lt_one_eq_self_of_isOpen
-- Porting note: droped unneeded assumptions
theorem gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen (hs₂ : IsOpen s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) :
gauge s x < 1 :=
interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s <| by rwa [hs₂.interior_eq]
#align gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_open gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpenₓ
-- Porting note: droped unneeded assumptions
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 404 | 409 | theorem gauge_lt_of_mem_smul (x : E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ ε • s) :
gauge s x < ε := by |
have : ε⁻¹ • x ∈ s := by rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hε.ne']
have h_gauge_lt := gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen hs₂ this
rwa [gauge_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hε.le), smul_eq_mul, inv_mul_lt_iff hε, mul_one]
at h_gauge_lt
|
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.rel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"706d88f2b8fdfeb0b22796433d7a6c1a010af9f2"
variable {α β γ : Type*}
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop -- deriving CompleteLattice, Inhabited
#align rel Rel
-- Porting note: `deriving` above doesn't work.
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
-- Porting note: required for later theorems.
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
#align rel.inv Rel.inv
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.inv_def Rel.inv_def
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
#align rel.inv_inv Rel.inv_inv
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
#align rel.dom Rel.dom
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
#align rel.dom_mono Rel.dom_mono
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
#align rel.codom Rel.codom
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.codom_inv Rel.codom_inv
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.dom_inv Rel.dom_inv
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
#align rel.comp Rel.comp
-- Porting note: the original `∘` syntax can't be overloaded here, lean considers it ambiguous.
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
#align rel.comp_assoc Rel.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
#align rel.comp_right_id Rel.comp_right_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
#align rel.comp_left_id Rel.comp_left_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
#align rel.inv_id Rel.inv_id
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
#align rel.inv_comp Rel.inv_comp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 156 | 158 | theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by |
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Bot.bot, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
#align_import data.set.bool_indicator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fc2ed6f838ce7c9b7c7171e58d78eaf7b438fb0e"
open Bool
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} (s : Set α)
noncomputable def boolIndicator (x : α) :=
@ite _ (x ∈ s) (Classical.propDecidable _) true false
#align set.bool_indicator Set.boolIndicator
theorem mem_iff_boolIndicator (x : α) : x ∈ s ↔ s.boolIndicator x = true := by
unfold boolIndicator
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mem_iff_bool_indicator Set.mem_iff_boolIndicator
| Mathlib/Data/Set/BoolIndicator.lean | 32 | 34 | theorem not_mem_iff_boolIndicator (x : α) : x ∉ s ↔ s.boolIndicator x = false := by |
unfold boolIndicator
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.SetSemiring
open MeasurableSpace Set
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {𝒜 : Set (Set α)} {s t : Set α}
structure IsSetAlgebra (𝒜 : Set (Set α)) : Prop where
empty_mem : ∅ ∈ 𝒜
compl_mem : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ 𝒜 → sᶜ ∈ 𝒜
union_mem : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ 𝒜 → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/SetAlgebra.lean | 172 | 212 | theorem mem_generateSetAlgebra_elim (s_mem : s ∈ generateSetAlgebra 𝒜) :
∃ A : Set (Set (Set α)), A.Finite ∧ (∀ a ∈ A, a.Finite) ∧
(∀ᵉ (a ∈ A) (t ∈ a), t ∈ 𝒜 ∨ tᶜ ∈ 𝒜) ∧ s = ⋃ a ∈ A, ⋂ t ∈ a, t := by |
induction s_mem with
| base u u_mem =>
refine ⟨{{u}}, finite_singleton {u},
fun a ha ↦ eq_of_mem_singleton ha ▸ finite_singleton u,
fun a ha t ht ↦ ?_, by simp⟩
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton ha, ha, eq_of_mem_singleton ht, ht] at *
exact Or.inl u_mem
| empty => exact ⟨∅, finite_empty, fun _ h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim,
fun _ ha _ _ ↦ (not_mem_empty _ ha).elim, by simp⟩
| compl u _ u_ind =>
rcases u_ind with ⟨A, A_fin, mem_A, hA, u_eq⟩
have := finite_coe_iff.2 A_fin
have := fun a : A ↦ finite_coe_iff.2 <| mem_A a.1 a.2
refine ⟨{{(f a).1ᶜ | a : A} | f : (Π a : A, ↑a)}, finite_coe_iff.1 inferInstance,
fun a ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ hf ▸ finite_coe_iff.1 inferInstance, fun a ha t ht ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases ha with ⟨f, rfl⟩
rcases ht with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [compl_compl, or_comm]
exact hA a.1 a.2 (f a).1 (f a).2
· ext x
simp only [u_eq, compl_iUnion, compl_iInter, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_compl_iff,
exists_prop, Subtype.exists, mem_setOf_eq, iUnion_exists, iUnion_iUnion_eq',
iInter_exists]
constructor <;> intro hx
· choose f hf using hx
exact ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a ha, (hf a ha).1⟩, fun _ a ha h ↦ by rw [← h]; exact (hf a ha).2⟩
· rcases hx with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact fun a ha ↦ ⟨f ⟨a, ha⟩, (f ⟨a, ha⟩).2, hf (f ⟨a, ha⟩)ᶜ a ha rfl⟩
| union u v _ _ u_ind v_ind =>
rcases u_ind with ⟨Au, Au_fin, mem_Au, hAu, u_eq⟩
rcases v_ind with ⟨Av, Av_fin, mem_Av, hAv, v_eq⟩
refine ⟨Au ∪ Av, Au_fin.union Av_fin, ?_, ?_, by rw [u_eq, v_eq, ← biUnion_union]⟩
· rintro a (ha | ha)
· exact mem_Au a ha
· exact mem_Av a ha
· rintro a (ha | ha) t ht
· exact hAu a ha t ht
· exact hAv a ha t ht
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.PiLp
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
#align_import analysis.matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {R l m n α β : Type*} [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
section LinfLinf
protected def normedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] : NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.normedAddCommGroup
#align matrix.normed_add_comm_group Matrix.normedAddCommGroup
section frobenius
open scoped Matrix
@[local instance]
def frobeniusSeminormedAddCommGroup [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
inferInstanceAs (SeminormedAddCommGroup (PiLp 2 fun _i : m => PiLp 2 fun _j : n => α))
#align matrix.frobenius_seminormed_add_comm_group Matrix.frobeniusSeminormedAddCommGroup
@[local instance]
def frobeniusNormedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] : NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedAddCommGroup (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
#align matrix.frobenius_normed_add_comm_group Matrix.frobeniusNormedAddCommGroup
@[local instance]
theorem frobeniusBoundedSMul [SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α]
[BoundedSMul R α] :
BoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : BoundedSMul R (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
@[local instance]
def frobeniusNormedSpace [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α] :
NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedSpace R (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
#align matrix.frobenius_normed_space Matrix.frobeniusNormedSpace
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = (∑ i, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) := by
-- Porting note: added, along with `WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply` below
change ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm fun i => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm fun j => A i j‖₊ = _
simp_rw [PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L2, NNReal.sq_sqrt, NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow, NNReal.rpow_two,
WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
#align matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_def Matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_def
theorem frobenius_norm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = (∑ i, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (frobenius_nnnorm_def A)).trans <| by simp [NNReal.coe_sum]
#align matrix.frobenius_norm_def Matrix.frobenius_norm_def
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊) :
‖A.map f‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by simp_rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, Matrix.map_apply, hf]
#align matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq Matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖ = ‖a‖) :
‖A.map f‖ = ‖A‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq A f fun a => Subtype.ext <| hf a : _)
#align matrix.frobenius_norm_map_eq Matrix.frobenius_norm_map_eq
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by
rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, frobenius_nnnorm_def, Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [Matrix.transpose_apply] -- Porting note: added
#align matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_transpose Matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_transpose
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_transpose A
#align matrix.frobenius_norm_transpose Matrix.frobenius_norm_transpose
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
(frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq _ _ nnnorm_star).trans A.frobenius_nnnorm_transpose
#align matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_conj_transpose Matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose A
#align matrix.frobenius_norm_conj_transpose Matrix.frobenius_norm_conjTranspose
instance frobenius_normedStarGroup [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] :
NormedStarGroup (Matrix m m α) :=
⟨frobenius_norm_conjTranspose⟩
#align matrix.frobenius_normed_star_group Matrix.frobenius_normedStarGroup
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_row (v : m → α) : ‖row v‖ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖ := by
rw [frobenius_norm_def, Fintype.sum_unique, PiLp.norm_eq_of_L2, Real.sqrt_eq_rpow]
simp only [row_apply, Real.rpow_two, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
#align matrix.frobenius_norm_row Matrix.frobenius_norm_row
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_row (v : m → α) : ‖row v‖₊ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| frobenius_norm_row v
#align matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_row Matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_row
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_col (v : n → α) : ‖col v‖ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖ := by
simp_rw [frobenius_norm_def, Fintype.sum_unique, PiLp.norm_eq_of_L2, Real.sqrt_eq_rpow]
simp only [col_apply, Real.rpow_two, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
#align matrix.frobenius_norm_col Matrix.frobenius_norm_col
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_col (v : n → α) : ‖col v‖₊ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| frobenius_norm_col v
#align matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_col Matrix.frobenius_nnnorm_col
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Matrix.lean | 635 | 646 | theorem frobenius_nnnorm_diagonal [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) :
‖diagonal v‖₊ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖₊ := by |
simp_rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, ← Finset.sum_product', Finset.univ_product_univ,
PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L2]
let s := (Finset.univ : Finset n).map ⟨fun i : n => (i, i), fun i j h => congr_arg Prod.fst h⟩
rw [← Finset.sum_subset (Finset.subset_univ s) fun i _hi his => ?_]
· rw [Finset.sum_map, NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow]
dsimp
simp_rw [diagonal_apply_eq, NNReal.rpow_two]
· suffices i.1 ≠ i.2 by rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ this, nnnorm_zero, NNReal.zero_rpow two_ne_zero]
intro h
exact Finset.mem_map.not.mp his ⟨i.1, Finset.mem_univ _, Prod.ext rfl h⟩
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
#align_import topology.separation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
open Function Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
section Separation
def SeparatedNhds : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun s t : Set X =>
∃ U V : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ IsOpen V ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ t ⊆ V ∧ Disjoint U V
#align separated_nhds SeparatedNhds
theorem separatedNhds_iff_disjoint {s t : Set X} : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) := by
simp only [(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).disjoint_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t), SeparatedNhds, exists_prop, ←
exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align separated_nhds_iff_disjoint separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
alias ⟨SeparatedNhds.disjoint_nhdsSet, _⟩ := separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
class T0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
t0 : ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, Inseparable x y → x = y
#align t0_space T0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y → x = y :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align t0_space_iff_inseparable t0Space_iff_inseparable
theorem t0Space_iff_not_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ¬Inseparable x y := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, Ne, not_imp_not, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_not_inseparable t0Space_iff_not_inseparable
theorem Inseparable.eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : Inseparable x y) : x = y :=
T0Space.t0 h
#align inseparable.eq Inseparable.eq
protected theorem Inducing.injective [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Injective f := fun _ _ h =>
(hf.inseparable_iff.1 <| .of_eq h).eq
#align inducing.injective Inducing.injective
protected theorem Inducing.embedding [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Embedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.injective⟩
#align inducing.embedding Inducing.embedding
lemma embedding_iff_inducing [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y} :
Embedding f ↔ Inducing f :=
⟨Embedding.toInducing, Inducing.embedding⟩
#align embedding_iff_inducing embedding_iff_inducing
theorem t0Space_iff_nhds_injective (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
t0Space_iff_inseparable X
#align t0_space_iff_nhds_injective t0Space_iff_nhds_injective
theorem nhds_injective [T0Space X] : Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
(t0Space_iff_nhds_injective X).1 ‹_›
#align nhds_injective nhds_injective
theorem inseparable_iff_eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ x = y :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align inseparable_iff_eq inseparable_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_iff [T0Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align nhds_eq_nhds_iff nhds_eq_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem inseparable_eq_eq [T0Space X] : Inseparable = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext inseparable_iff_eq
#align inseparable_eq_eq inseparable_eq_eq
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inseparable_iff {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
⟨fun h s hs ↦ inseparable_iff_forall_open.1 h _ (hb.isOpen hs),
fun h ↦ hb.nhds_hasBasis.eq_of_same_basis <| by
convert hb.nhds_hasBasis using 2
exact and_congr_right (h _)⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.eq_iff [T0Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : x = y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
inseparable_iff_eq.symm.trans hb.inseparable_iff
theorem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, xor_iff_not_iff, not_forall, exists_prop,
inseparable_iff_forall_open, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_exists_is_open_xor_mem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
theorem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) :=
(t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem X).1 ‹_› h
#align exists_is_open_xor_mem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
def specializationOrder (X) [TopologicalSpace X] [T0Space X] : PartialOrder X :=
{ specializationPreorder X, PartialOrder.lift (OrderDual.toDual ∘ 𝓝) nhds_injective with }
#align specialization_order specializationOrder
instance SeparationQuotient.instT0Space : T0Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
⟨fun x y => Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun _ _ h =>
SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 <| SeparationQuotient.inducing_mk.inseparable_iff.1 h⟩
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· refine this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s \ U = s := hmin (s \ U) diff_subset ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩ (hs.sdiff hUo)
exact (this.symm.subset hx).2 hxU
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2
⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton
theorem IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton [T0Space X] [CompactSpace X] {S : Set X}
(hS : IsClosed S) (hne : S.Nonempty) : ∃ x : X, x ∈ S ∧ IsClosed ({x} : Set X) := by
obtain ⟨V, Vsub, Vne, Vcls, hV⟩ := hS.exists_minimal_nonempty_closed_subset hne
rcases minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton Vcls Vne hV with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, Vsub (mem_singleton x), Vcls⟩
#align is_closed.exists_closed_singleton IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· exact this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s ∩ U = s := hmin (s ∩ U) inter_subset_left ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ (hs.inter hUo)
exact hyU (this.symm.subset hy).2
#align minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2 ⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton
theorem exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hfin : s.Finite)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (ho : IsOpen s) : ∃ x ∈ s, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
lift s to Finset X using hfin
induction' s using Finset.strongInductionOn with s ihs
rcases em (∃ t, t ⊂ s ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ IsOpen (t : Set X)) with (⟨t, hts, htne, hto⟩ | ht)
· rcases ihs t hts htne hto with ⟨x, hxt, hxo⟩
exact ⟨x, hts.1 hxt, hxo⟩
· -- Porting note: was `rcases minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne _ with ⟨x, hx⟩`
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/116
rsuffices ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, s.toSet = {x}
· exact ⟨x, hx.symm ▸ rfl, hx ▸ ho⟩
refine minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne ?_
refine fun t hts htne hto => of_not_not fun hts' => ht ?_
lift t to Finset X using s.finite_toSet.subset hts
exact ⟨t, ssubset_iff_subset_ne.2 ⟨hts, mt Finset.coe_inj.2 hts'⟩, htne, hto⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_open_finite exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_finite [T0Space X] [Finite X] [Nonempty X] :
∃ x : X, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) :=
let ⟨x, _, h⟩ := exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite (Set.toFinite _)
univ_nonempty isOpen_univ
⟨x, h⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_fintype exists_open_singleton_of_finite
theorem t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T0Space Y] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => hf <| (h.map hf').eq⟩
#align t0_space_of_injective_of_continuous t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T0Space X :=
t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t0_space Embedding.t0Space
instance Subtype.t0Space [T0Space X] {p : X → Prop} : T0Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t0Space
#align subtype.t0_space Subtype.t0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun a b : X => a ∉ closure ({b} : Set X) ∨ b ∉ closure ({a} : Set X) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, inseparable_iff_mem_closure, not_and_or]
#align t0_space_iff_or_not_mem_closure t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure
instance Prod.instT0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] [T0Space Y] : T0Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => Prod.ext (h.map continuous_fst).eq (h.map continuous_snd).eq⟩
instance Pi.instT0Space {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, T0Space (X i)] :
T0Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => funext fun i => (h.map (continuous_apply i)).eq⟩
#align pi.t0_space Pi.instT0Space
instance ULift.instT0Space [T0Space X] : T0Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t0Space
theorem T0Space.of_cover (h : ∀ x y, Inseparable x y → ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s ∧ T0Space s) :
T0Space X := by
refine ⟨fun x y hxy => ?_⟩
rcases h x y hxy with ⟨s, hxs, hys, hs⟩
lift x to s using hxs; lift y to s using hys
rw [← subtype_inseparable_iff] at hxy
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hxy.eq
#align t0_space.of_cover T0Space.of_cover
theorem T0Space.of_open_cover (h : ∀ x, ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s ∧ T0Space s) : T0Space X :=
T0Space.of_cover fun x _ hxy =>
let ⟨s, hxs, hso, hs⟩ := h x
⟨s, hxs, (hxy.mem_open_iff hso).1 hxs, hs⟩
#align t0_space.of_open_cover T0Space.of_open_cover
@[mk_iff]
class R0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
specializes_symmetric : Symmetric (Specializes : X → X → Prop)
export R0Space (specializes_symmetric)
class T1Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
t1 : ∀ x, IsClosed ({x} : Set X)
#align t1_space T1Space
theorem isClosed_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsClosed ({x} : Set X) :=
T1Space.t1 x
#align is_closed_singleton isClosed_singleton
theorem isOpen_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen ({x}ᶜ : Set X) :=
isClosed_singleton.isOpen_compl
#align is_open_compl_singleton isOpen_compl_singleton
theorem isOpen_ne [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen { y | y ≠ x } :=
isOpen_compl_singleton
#align is_open_ne isOpen_ne
@[to_additive]
theorem Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport [T1Space X] [One X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X}
(hf : Continuous f) : IsOpen (mulSupport f) :=
isOpen_ne.preimage hf
#align continuous.is_open_mul_support Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport
#align continuous.is_open_support Continuous.isOpen_support
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x = 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ne.nhdsWithin_eq h
#align ne.nhds_within_compl_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) (s : Set X) :
𝓝[s \ {y}] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [diff_eq, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds h)
#align ne.nhds_within_diff_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton
lemma nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_le [T1Space X] (x y : X) : 𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x ≤ 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl|hy
· exact Eq.le rfl
· rw [Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton hy]
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
IsOpen { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≠] x, p y } := by
refine isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.mpr fun a ha => ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.mpr ha] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | h
· exact hb
· rw [h.symm.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton] at hb
exact hb.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds_within isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin
protected theorem Set.Finite.isClosed [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Set.Finite s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s]
exact hs.isClosed_biUnion fun i _ => isClosed_singleton
#align set.finite.is_closed Set.Finite.isClosed
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne [T1Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ a ∈ b, x ∈ a ∧ y ∉ a := by
rcases hb.isOpen_iff.1 isOpen_ne x h with ⟨a, ab, xa, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ab, xa, fun h => ha h rfl⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_mem_of_ne TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne
protected theorem Finset.isClosed [T1Space X] (s : Finset X) : IsClosed (s : Set X) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed
#align finset.is_closed Finset.isClosed
theorem t1Space_TFAE (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
List.TFAE [T1Space X,
∀ x, IsClosed ({ x } : Set X),
∀ x, IsOpen ({ x }ᶜ : Set X),
Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → {y}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, y ∉ s,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2
· exact ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
tfae_have 2 ↔ 3
· simp only [isOpen_compl_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 3
· refine forall_swap.trans ?_
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 6
· simp only [← subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_mem_subset_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7
· simp only [(nhds_basis_opens _).mem_iff, subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc,
and_left_comm]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 8
· simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_right]
tfae_have 8 ↔ 9
· exact forall_swap.trans (by simp only [disjoint_comm, ne_comm])
tfae_have 1 → 4
· simp only [continuous_def, CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff']
rintro H s (rfl | hs)
exacts [isOpen_empty, compl_compl s ▸ (@Set.Finite.isClosed _ _ H _ hs).isOpen_compl]
tfae_have 4 → 2
· exact fun h x => (CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff.2 <| Or.inr (finite_singleton _)).preimage h
tfae_have 2 ↔ 10
· simp only [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, specializes_iff_mem_closure, subset_def,
mem_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
#align t1_space_tfae t1Space_TFAE
theorem t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of : T1Space X ↔ Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 3
#align t1_space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of
theorem CofiniteTopology.continuous_of [T1Space X] : Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mp ‹_›
#align cofinite_topology.continuous_of CofiniteTopology.continuous_of
theorem t1Space_iff_exists_open :
T1Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 6
#align t1_space_iff_exists_open t1Space_iff_exists_open
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 8
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 7
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 9
#align t1_space_iff_specializes_imp_eq t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq
theorem disjoint_pure_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_pure_nhds disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem disjoint_nhds_pure [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_nhds_pure disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem Specializes.eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ⤳ y) : x = y :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.1 ‹_› h
#align specializes.eq Specializes.eq
theorem specializes_iff_eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} : x ⤳ y ↔ x = y :=
⟨Specializes.eq, fun h => h ▸ specializes_rfl⟩
#align specializes_iff_eq specializes_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem specializes_eq_eq [T1Space X] : (· ⤳ ·) = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext specializes_iff_eq
#align specializes_eq_eq specializes_eq_eq
@[simp]
theorem pure_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : pure a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_pure.symm.trans specializes_iff_eq
#align pure_le_nhds_iff pure_le_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_eq
#align nhds_le_nhds_iff nhds_le_nhds_iff
instance (priority := 100) [T1Space X] : R0Space X where
specializes_symmetric _ _ := by rw [specializes_iff_eq, specializes_iff_eq]; exact Eq.symm
instance : T1Space (CofiniteTopology X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mpr continuous_id
theorem t1Space_antitone : Antitone (@T1Space X) := fun a _ h _ =>
@T1Space.mk _ a fun x => (T1Space.t1 x).mono h
#align t1_space_antitone t1Space_antitone
theorem continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Function.update f x y) s x' ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x' :=
EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt
(mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| mem_of_superset (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hne) fun _y' hy' =>
Function.update_noteq hy' _ _)
(Function.update_noteq hne _ _)
#align continuous_within_at_update_of_ne continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{f : X → Y} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousAt (Function.update f x y) x' ↔ ContinuousAt f x' := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ, continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hne]
#align continuous_at_update_of_ne continuousAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousOn_update_iff [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x : X} {y : Y} :
ContinuousOn (Function.update f x y) s ↔
ContinuousOn f (s \ {x}) ∧ (x ∈ s → Tendsto f (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y)) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, ← and_forall_ne x, and_comm]
refine and_congr ⟨fun H z hz => ?_, fun H z hzx hzs => ?_⟩ (forall_congr' fun _ => ?_)
· specialize H z hz.2 hz.1
rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hz.2] at H
exact H.mono diff_subset
· rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hzx]
refine (H z ⟨hzs, hzx⟩).mono_of_mem (inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ ?_)
exact isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hzx
· exact continuousWithinAt_update_same
#align continuous_on_update_iff continuousOn_update_iff
theorem t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T1Space Y] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.2 fun _ _ h => hf (h.map hf').eq
#align t1_space_of_injective_of_continuous t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t1Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T1Space X :=
t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t1_space Embedding.t1Space
instance Subtype.t1Space {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
T1Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t1Space
#align subtype.t1_space Subtype.t1Space
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space X] [T1Space Y] : T1Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ => @singleton_prod_singleton _ _ a b ▸ isClosed_singleton.prod isClosed_singleton⟩
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, T1Space (X i)] :
T1Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun f => univ_pi_singleton f ▸ isClosed_set_pi fun _ _ => isClosed_singleton⟩
instance ULift.instT1Space [T1Space X] : T1Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) TotallyDisconnectedSpace.t1Space [h: TotallyDisconnectedSpace X] :
T1Space X := by
rw [((t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 1 :)]
intro x
rw [← totallyDisconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent_singleton.mp h x]
exact isClosed_connectedComponent
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T1Space.t0Space [T1Space X] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => h.specializes.eq⟩
#align t1_space.t0_space T1Space.t0Space
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {x y : X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y ↔ y ≠ x :=
isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds_iff
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : y ≠ x) : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y :=
compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff.mpr h
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds compl_singleton_mem_nhds
@[simp]
theorem closure_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : closure ({x} : Set X) = {x} :=
isClosed_singleton.closure_eq
#align closure_singleton closure_singleton
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: the proof was `hs.induction_on (by simp) fun x => by simp`
theorem Set.Subsingleton.closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Subsingleton) :
(closure s).Subsingleton := by
rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) <;> simp
#align set.subsingleton.closure Set.Subsingleton.closure
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} : (closure s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨fun h => h.anti subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align subsingleton_closure subsingleton_closure
theorem isClosedMap_const {X Y} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {y : Y} :
IsClosedMap (Function.const X y) :=
IsClosedMap.of_nonempty fun s _ h2s => by simp_rw [const, h2s.image_const, isClosed_singleton]
#align is_closed_map_const isClosedMap_const
theorem nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s : Set X} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
𝓝[insert y s] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
refine le_antisymm (Filter.le_def.2 fun t ht => ?_) (nhdsWithin_mono x <| subset_insert y s)
obtain ⟨o, ho, hxo, host⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr ⟨o \ {y}, ho.sdiff isClosed_singleton, ⟨hxo, hxy⟩, ?_⟩
rw [inter_insert_of_not_mem <| not_mem_diff_of_mem (mem_singleton y)]
exact (inter_subset_inter diff_subset Subset.rfl).trans host
#align nhds_within_insert_of_ne nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s t : Set X}
(hu : t ⊆ insert y s) : insert x s ∈ 𝓝[t] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hu
refine nhdsWithin_mono x hu ?_
rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h]
exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_insert x s)
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_of_subset_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert
@[simp]
theorem ker_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X) : (𝓝 x).ker = {x} := by
simp [ker_nhds_eq_specializes]
theorem biInter_basis_nhds [T1Space X] {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {x : X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : ⋂ (i) (_ : p i), s i = {x} := by
rw [← h.ker, ker_nhds]
#align bInter_basis_nhds biInter_basis_nhds
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {x : X} {s : Set X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∉ s := by
rw [isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhdsSet, subset_compl_singleton_iff]
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_set_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_le_iff [T1Space X] {s t : Set X} : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => monotone_nhdsSet h⟩
simp_rw [Filter.le_def]; intro h x hx
specialize h {x}ᶜ
simp_rw [compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff] at h
by_contra hxt
exact h hxt hx
#align nhds_set_le_iff nhdsSet_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_inj_iff [T1Space X] {s t : Set X} : 𝓝ˢ s = 𝓝ˢ t ↔ s = t := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff]
exact and_congr nhdsSet_le_iff nhdsSet_le_iff
#align nhds_set_inj_iff nhdsSet_inj_iff
theorem injective_nhdsSet [T1Space X] : Function.Injective (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) := fun _ _ hst =>
nhdsSet_inj_iff.mp hst
#align injective_nhds_set injective_nhdsSet
theorem strictMono_nhdsSet [T1Space X] : StrictMono (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) :=
monotone_nhdsSet.strictMono_of_injective injective_nhdsSet
#align strict_mono_nhds_set strictMono_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {s : Set X} {x : X} : 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [← nhdsSet_singleton, nhdsSet_le_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
#align nhds_le_nhds_set_iff nhds_le_nhdsSet_iff
theorem Dense.diff_singleton [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s) (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
Dense (s \ {x}) :=
hs.inter_of_isOpen_right (dense_compl_singleton x) isOpen_compl_singleton
#align dense.diff_singleton Dense.diff_singleton
theorem Dense.diff_finset [T1Space X] [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s)
(t : Finset X) : Dense (s \ t) := by
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simpa using hs
| insert _ ih =>
rw [Finset.coe_insert, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff]
exact ih.diff_singleton _
#align dense.diff_finset Dense.diff_finset
theorem Dense.diff_finite [T1Space X] [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] {s : Set X} (hs : Dense s)
{t : Set X} (ht : t.Finite) : Dense (s \ t) := by
convert hs.diff_finset ht.toFinset
exact (Finite.coe_toFinset _).symm
#align dense.diff_finite Dense.diff_finite
theorem eq_of_tendsto_nhds [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)) : f x = y :=
by_contra fun hfa : f x ≠ y =>
have fact₁ : {f x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y := compl_singleton_mem_nhds hfa.symm
have fact₂ : Tendsto f (pure x) (𝓝 y) := h.comp (tendsto_id'.2 <| pure_le_nhds x)
fact₂ fact₁ (Eq.refl <| f x)
#align eq_of_tendsto_nhds eq_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {g : X → Y}
{l : Filter X} {b₁ b₂ : Y} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b₁)) (hb : b₁ ≠ b₂) : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ≠ b₂ :=
hg.eventually (isOpen_compl_singleton.eventually_mem hb)
#align filter.tendsto.eventually_ne Filter.Tendsto.eventually_ne
theorem ContinuousAt.eventually_ne [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {g : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hg1 : ContinuousAt g x) (hg2 : g x ≠ y) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, g z ≠ y :=
hg1.tendsto.eventually_ne hg2
#align continuous_at.eventually_ne ContinuousAt.eventually_ne
theorem eventually_ne_nhds [T1Space X] {a b : X} (h : a ≠ b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≠ b :=
IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne h
theorem eventually_ne_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {a b : X} {s : Set X} (h : a ≠ b) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ≠ b :=
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| eventually_ne_nhds h
theorem continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y} {x : X} {y : Y}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y)) : ContinuousAt f x := by
rwa [ContinuousAt, eq_of_tendsto_nhds h]
#align continuous_at_of_tendsto_nhds continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_const_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {l : Filter Y} [NeBot l] {c d : X} :
Tendsto (fun _ => c) l (𝓝 d) ↔ c = d := by simp_rw [Tendsto, Filter.map_const, pure_le_nhds_iff]
#align tendsto_const_nhds_iff tendsto_const_nhds_iff
theorem isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X)
{s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (hsf : s.Finite) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
have A : {x} ⊆ s := by simp only [singleton_subset_iff, mem_of_mem_nhds hs]
have B : IsClosed (s \ {x}) := (hsf.subset diff_subset).isClosed
have C : (s \ {x})ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x := B.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds fun h => h.2 rfl
have D : {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by simpa only [← diff_eq, diff_diff_cancel_left A] using inter_mem hs C
rwa [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← singleton_subset_iff, subset_interior_iff_isOpen] at D
#align is_open_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds
theorem infinite_of_mem_nhds {X} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] (x : X) [hx : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)]
{s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : Set.Infinite s := by
refine fun hsf => hx.1 ?_
rw [← isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds]
exact isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds x hs hsf
#align infinite_of_mem_nhds infinite_of_mem_nhds
theorem discrete_of_t1_of_finite [T1Space X] [Finite X] :
DiscreteTopology X := by
apply singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp
intro x
rw [← isClosed_compl_iff]
exact (Set.toFinite _).isClosed
#align discrete_of_t1_of_finite discrete_of_t1_of_finite
theorem PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete [PreconnectedSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] :
Subsingleton X := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton]
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [Ne, ← mem_singleton_iff, (isClopen_discrete _).eq_univ <| singleton_nonempty y] at hxy
exact hxy (mem_univ x)
#align preconnected_space.trivial_of_discrete PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete
theorem IsPreconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (h : IsPreconnected s)
(hs : s.Nontrivial) : s.Infinite := by
refine mt (fun hf => (subsingleton_coe s).mp ?_) (not_subsingleton_iff.mpr hs)
haveI := @discrete_of_t1_of_finite s _ _ hf.to_subtype
exact @PreconnectedSpace.trivial_of_discrete _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace h) _
#align is_preconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial IsPreconnected.infinite_of_nontrivial
theorem ConnectedSpace.infinite [ConnectedSpace X] [Nontrivial X] [T1Space X] : Infinite X :=
infinite_univ_iff.mp <| isPreconnected_univ.infinite_of_nontrivial nontrivial_univ
#align connected_space.infinite ConnectedSpace.infinite
instance (priority := 100) ConnectedSpace.neBot_nhdsWithin_compl_of_nontrivial_of_t1space
[ConnectedSpace X] [Nontrivial X] [T1Space X] (x : X) :
NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
by_contra contra
rw [not_neBot, ← isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds] at contra
replace contra := nonempty_inter isOpen_compl_singleton
contra (compl_union_self _) (Set.nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial _) (singleton_nonempty _)
simp [compl_inter_self {x}] at contra
theorem SeparationQuotient.t1Space_iff : T1Space (SeparationQuotient X) ↔ R0Space X := by
rw [r0Space_iff, ((t1Space_TFAE (SeparationQuotient X)).out 0 9 :)]
constructor
· intro h x y xspecy
rw [← Inducing.specializes_iff inducing_mk, h xspecy] at *
· rintro h ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ sxspecsy
have xspecy : x ⤳ y := (Inducing.specializes_iff inducing_mk).mp sxspecsy
have yspecx : y ⤳ x := h xspecy
erw [mk_eq_mk, inseparable_iff_specializes_and]
exact ⟨xspecy, yspecx⟩
theorem singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : {x} ∈ 𝓝[s] x := by
have : ({⟨x, hx⟩} : Set s) ∈ 𝓝 (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) := by simp [nhds_discrete]
simpa only [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe hx, image_singleton] using
@image_mem_map _ _ _ ((↑) : s → X) _ this
#align singleton_mem_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
theorem nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] x = pure x :=
le_antisymm (le_pure_iff.2 <| singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete hx) (pure_le_nhdsWithin hx)
#align nhds_within_of_mem_discrete nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
theorem Filter.HasBasis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop}
{t : ι → Set X} {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hb : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p t)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ i, p i ∧ t i ∩ s = {x} := by
rcases (nhdsWithin_hasBasis hb s).mem_iff.1 (singleton_mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete hx) with
⟨i, hi, hix⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, hix.antisymm <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds <| hb.mem_of_mem hi, hx⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete Filter.HasBasis.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
theorem nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, U ∩ s = {x} := by
simpa using (𝓝 x).basis_sets.exists_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
#align nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete
theorem isOpen_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ U ∩ s = {x} := by
obtain ⟨U, hU_nhds, hU_inter⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
obtain ⟨t, ht_sub, ht_open, ht_x⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hU_nhds
refine ⟨t, ht_open, Set.Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· exact hU_inter ▸ Set.inter_subset_inter_left s ht_sub
· rw [Set.subset_inter_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨ht_x, hx⟩
theorem disjoint_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete {s : Set X} [DiscreteTopology s] {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) :
∃ U ∈ 𝓝[≠] x, Disjoint U s :=
let ⟨V, h, h'⟩ := nhds_inter_eq_singleton_of_mem_discrete hx
⟨{x}ᶜ ∩ V, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ h,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (by rw [inter_assoc, h', compl_inter_self])⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_within_of_mem_discrete disjoint_nhdsWithin_of_mem_discrete
@[deprecated embedding_inclusion (since := "2023-02-02")]
theorem TopologicalSpace.subset_trans {s t : Set X} (ts : t ⊆ s) :
(instTopologicalSpaceSubtype : TopologicalSpace t) =
(instTopologicalSpaceSubtype : TopologicalSpace s).induced (Set.inclusion ts) :=
(embedding_inclusion ts).induced
#align topological_space.subset_trans TopologicalSpace.subset_trans
@[mk_iff]
class T2Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
t2 : Pairwise fun x y => ∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v
#align t2_space T2Space
theorem t2_separation [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v : Set X, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ u ∧ y ∈ v ∧ Disjoint u v :=
T2Space.t2 h
#align t2_separation t2_separation
-- todo: use this as a definition?
theorem t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds : T2Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := by
refine (t2Space_iff X).trans (forall₃_congr fun x y _ => ?_)
simp only [(nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens y), exists_prop, ← exists_and_left,
and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align t2_space_iff_disjoint_nhds t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_nhds [T2Space X] {x y : X} : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨fun hd he => by simp [he, nhds_neBot.ne] at hd, (t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds.mp ‹_› ·)⟩
#align disjoint_nhds_nhds disjoint_nhds_nhds
theorem pairwise_disjoint_nhds [T2Space X] : Pairwise (Disjoint on (𝓝 : X → Filter X)) := fun _ _ =>
disjoint_nhds_nhds.2
#align pairwise_disjoint_nhds pairwise_disjoint_nhds
protected theorem Set.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds [T2Space X] (s : Set X) : s.PairwiseDisjoint 𝓝 :=
pairwise_disjoint_nhds.set_pairwise s
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_nhds Set.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds
theorem Set.Finite.t2_separation [T2Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ U : X → Set X, (∀ x, x ∈ U x ∧ IsOpen (U x)) ∧ s.PairwiseDisjoint U :=
s.pairwiseDisjoint_nhds.exists_mem_filter_basis hs nhds_basis_opens
#align set.finite.t2_separation Set.Finite.t2_separation
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.t1Space [T2Space X] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mpr fun _ _ hne =>
(disjoint_nhds_nhds.2 hne).mono_left <| pure_le_nhds _
#align t2_space.t1_space T2Space.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T2Space.r1Space [T2Space X] : R1Space X :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (eq_or_ne x y).imp specializes_of_eq disjoint_nhds_nhds.2⟩
theorem SeparationQuotient.t2Space_iff : T2Space (SeparationQuotient X) ↔ R1Space X := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, Pairwise, surjective_mk.forall₂, ne_eq, mk_eq_mk,
r1Space_iff_inseparable_or_disjoint_nhds, ← disjoint_comap_iff surjective_mk, comap_mk_nhds_mk,
← or_iff_not_imp_left]
instance SeparationQuotient.t2Space [R1Space X] : T2Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
t2Space_iff.2 ‹_›
instance (priority := 80) [R1Space X] [T0Space X] : T2Space X :=
t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds.2 fun _x _y hne ↦ disjoint_nhds_nhds_iff_not_inseparable.2 fun hxy ↦
hne hxy.eq
theorem R1Space.t2Space_iff_t0Space [R1Space X] : T2Space X ↔ T0Space X := by
constructor <;> intro <;> infer_instance
theorem t2_iff_nhds : T2Space X ↔ ∀ {x y : X}, NeBot (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y) → x = y := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, disjoint_iff, neBot_iff, Ne, not_imp_comm, Pairwise]
#align t2_iff_nhds t2_iff_nhds
theorem eq_of_nhds_neBot [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : NeBot (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓝 y)) : x = y :=
t2_iff_nhds.mp ‹_› h
#align eq_of_nhds_ne_bot eq_of_nhds_neBot
theorem t2Space_iff_nhds :
T2Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 y, Disjoint U V := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, Filter.disjoint_iff, Pairwise]
#align t2_space_iff_nhds t2Space_iff_nhds
theorem t2_separation_nhds [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v, u ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ v ∈ 𝓝 y ∧ Disjoint u v :=
let ⟨u, v, open_u, open_v, x_in, y_in, huv⟩ := t2_separation h
⟨u, v, open_u.mem_nhds x_in, open_v.mem_nhds y_in, huv⟩
#align t2_separation_nhds t2_separation_nhds
theorem t2_separation_compact_nhds [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ u v, u ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ v ∈ 𝓝 y ∧ IsCompact u ∧ IsCompact v ∧ Disjoint u v := by
simpa only [exists_prop, ← exists_and_left, and_comm, and_assoc, and_left_comm] using
((compact_basis_nhds x).disjoint_iff (compact_basis_nhds y)).1 (disjoint_nhds_nhds.2 h)
#align t2_separation_compact_nhds t2_separation_compact_nhds
theorem t2_iff_ultrafilter :
T2Space X ↔ ∀ {x y : X} (f : Ultrafilter X), ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x → ↑f ≤ 𝓝 y → x = y :=
t2_iff_nhds.trans <| by simp only [← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_imp, le_inf_iff, exists_imp]
#align t2_iff_ultrafilter t2_iff_ultrafilter
theorem t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal : T2Space X ↔ IsClosed (diagonal X) := by
simp only [t2Space_iff_disjoint_nhds, ← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, Prod.forall,
nhds_prod_eq, compl_diagonal_mem_prod, mem_compl_iff, mem_diagonal_iff, Pairwise]
#align t2_iff_is_closed_diagonal t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal
theorem isClosed_diagonal [T2Space X] : IsClosed (diagonal X) :=
t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal.mp ‹_›
#align is_closed_diagonal isClosed_diagonal
-- Porting note: 2 lemmas moved below
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique [T2Space X] {f : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X} [NeBot l]
(ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_neBot <| neBot_of_le <| le_inf ha hb
#align tendsto_nhds_unique tendsto_nhds_unique
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique' [T2Space X] {f : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X} (_ : NeBot l)
(ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : a = b :=
eq_of_nhds_neBot <| neBot_of_le <| le_inf ha hb
#align tendsto_nhds_unique' tendsto_nhds_unique'
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq [T2Space X] {f g : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X}
[NeBot l] (ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (hfg : f =ᶠ[l] g) : a = b :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (ha.congr' hfg) hb
#align tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventually_eq tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq
theorem tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq [T2Space X] {f g : Y → X} {l : Filter Y} {a b : X}
(ha : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (hb : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (hfg : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x = g x) : a = b :=
have : ∃ᶠ z : X × X in 𝓝 (a, b), z.1 = z.2 := (ha.prod_mk_nhds hb).frequently hfg
not_not.1 fun hne => this (isClosed_diagonal.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hne)
#align tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq tendsto_nhds_unique_of_frequently_eq
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inter_eq [T2Space X] {s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) :
𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) = 𝓝ˢ s ⊓ 𝓝ˢ t := by
refine le_antisymm (nhdsSet_inter_le _ _) ?_
simp_rw [hs.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup, ht.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup, nhdsSet, sSup_image]
refine iSup₂_le fun x hxs ↦ iSup₂_le fun y hyt ↦ ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl|hne)
· exact le_iSup₂_of_le x ⟨hxs, hyt⟩ (inf_idem _).le
· exact (disjoint_nhds_nhds.mpr hne).eq_bot ▸ bot_le
| Mathlib/Topology/Separation.lean | 1,438 | 1,450 | theorem Set.InjOn.exists_mem_nhdsSet {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[T2Space Y] {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} (inj : InjOn f s) (sc : IsCompact s)
(fc : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (loc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, InjOn f u) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s, InjOn f t := by |
have : ∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ s, ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y.1 = f y.2 → y.1 = y.2 := fun (x, y) ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | hne
· rcases loc x hx with ⟨u, hu, hf⟩
exact Filter.mem_of_superset (prod_mem_nhds hu hu) <| forall_prod_set.2 hf
· suffices ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 (x, y), f z.1 ≠ f z.2 from this.mono fun _ hne h ↦ absurd h hne
refine (fc x hx).prod_map' (fc y hy) <| isClosed_diagonal.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds ?_
exact inj.ne hx hy hne
rw [← eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall, sc.nhdsSet_prod_eq sc] at this
exact eventually_prod_self_iff.1 this
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.WidePullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7316286ff2942aa14e540add9058c6b0aa1c8070"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
universe w v₁ v₂ v u u₂
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy, no local
abbrev WalkingCospan : Type :=
WidePullbackShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.left : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.left
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.right : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.right
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.one : WalkingCospan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.one CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.one
abbrev WalkingSpan : Type :=
WidePushoutShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.left : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.left
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.right : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.right
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.zero : WalkingSpan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.zero CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.zero
open WalkingSpan.Hom WalkingCospan.Hom WidePullbackShape.Hom WidePushoutShape.Hom
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
def WalkingCospan.ext {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} {s t : Cone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.left = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.right = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₁
have h₂ := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₂
simp_rw [h₂, ← Category.assoc, ← w₁, ← h₁]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.ext
def WalkingSpan.ext {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} {s t : Cocone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.left ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.right ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cocones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₁
have h₂ := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₂
simp_rw [← h₁, Category.assoc, w₁, h₂]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.ext
def cospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : WalkingCospan ⥤ C :=
WidePullbackShape.wideCospan Z (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan
def span {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : WalkingSpan ⥤ C :=
WidePushoutShape.wideSpan X (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j Y Z) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.span CategoryTheory.Limits.span
@[simp]
theorem cospan_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_left
@[simp]
theorem span_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.left = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_left CategoryTheory.Limits.span_left
@[simp]
theorem cospan_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.right = Y := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_right
@[simp]
theorem span_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.right = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_right CategoryTheory.Limits.span_right
@[simp]
theorem cospan_one {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.one = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_one
@[simp]
theorem span_zero {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.zero = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.span_zero
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inl {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inl = f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inl
@[simp]
theorem span_map_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.fst = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_fst
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inr {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inr = g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inr
@[simp]
theorem span_map_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.snd = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_snd
theorem cospan_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingCospan) :
(cospan f g).map (WalkingCospan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_id
theorem span_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingSpan) :
(span f g).map (WalkingSpan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_id
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoCospan (F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C) : F ≅ cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoCospan
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoSpan (F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C) : F ≅ span (F.map fst) (F.map snd) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_span CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoSpan
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
def cospanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
cospan f g ⋙ F ≅ cospan (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.right = Iso.refl _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.one = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_one
end
def spanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
span f g ⋙ F ≅ span (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.right = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.zero = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_zero
end
section
variable {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (iX : X ≅ X') (iY : Y ≅ Y') (iZ : Z ≅ Z')
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Z'} {g' : Y' ⟶ Z'}
def cospanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
cospan f g ≅ cospan f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iZ, iX, iY])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_left : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.left = iX := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_right : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.right = iY := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.one = iZ := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_one
end
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} {g' : X' ⟶ Z'}
def spanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
span f g ≅ span f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iX, iY, iZ])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.left = iY := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.right = iZ := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_one : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.zero = iX := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_zero
end
end
variable {W X Y Z : C}
abbrev PullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
Cone (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone
namespace PullbackCone
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
abbrev fst (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ X :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst
abbrev snd (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ Y :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd
@[simp]
theorem π_app_left (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.left = c.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem π_app_right (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.right = c.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_one (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.π.app WalkingCospan.one = t.fst ≫ f := by
have w := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at w; simpa using w
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition_one
def isLimitAux (t : PullbackCone f g) (lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.snd = s.snd)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => Option.casesOn j (by
rw [← s.w inl, ← t.w inl, ← Category.assoc]
congr
exact fac_left s)
fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux
def isLimitAux' (t : PullbackCone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PullbackCone f g,
{ l //
l ≫ t.fst = s.fst ∧
l ≫ t.snd = s.snd ∧ ∀ {m}, m ≫ t.fst = s.fst → m ≫ t.snd = s.snd → m = l }) :
Limits.IsLimit t :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1)
(fun s => (create s).2.2.1) fun s _ w =>
(create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) : PullbackCone f g where
pt := W
π := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (fst ≫ f) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' fst snd
naturality := by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) j <;> cases j <;> dsimp <;> simp [eq] }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_left {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.left = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_right {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.right = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_one {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.one = fst ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_fst {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).fst = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem mk_snd {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).snd = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PullbackCone f g) : fst t ≫ f = snd t ≫ g :=
(t.w inl).trans (t.w inr).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition
theorem equalizer_ext (t : PullbackCone f g) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt} (h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t)
(h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, k ≫ t.π.app j = l ≫ t.π.app j
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w inl, reassoc_of% h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.equalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.equalizer_ext
theorem IsLimit.hom_ext {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt}
(h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t) (h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext
theorem mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono f] :
Mono t.snd := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ i⟩
rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ g) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono
theorem mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono g] :
Mono t.fst := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht i ?_⟩
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ f) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono
def ext {s t : PullbackCone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.fst = i.hom ≫ t.fst)
(w₂ : s.snd = i.hom ≫ t.snd) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingCospan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ext
-- Porting note: `IsLimit.lift` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
def IsLimit.lift {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ t.pt :=
ht.lift <| PullbackCone.mk _ _ w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_fst {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ fst t = h := ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_snd {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ snd t = k := ht.fac _ _
def IsLimit.lift' {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ t.pt // l ≫ fst t = h ∧ l ≫ snd t = k } :=
⟨IsLimit.lift ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift'
def IsLimit.mk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g)
(lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (mk fst snd eq) :=
isLimitAux _ lift fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk
@[simps]
def Cone.ofPullbackCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr)) :
Cone F where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).inv
#align category_theory.limits.cone.of_pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.ofPullbackCone
@[simps]
def Cocone.ofPushoutCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd)) :
Cocone F where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).hom ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.of_pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.ofPushoutCocone
@[simps]
def PullbackCone.ofCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr) where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).hom
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ofCone
@[simps!]
def PullbackCone.isoMk {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
(Cones.postcompose (diagramIsoCospan.{v} _).hom).obj t ≅
PullbackCone.mk (t.π.app WalkingCospan.left) (t.π.app WalkingCospan.right)
((t.π.naturality inl).symm.trans (t.π.naturality inr : _)) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isoMk
@[simps]
def PushoutCocone.ofCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd) where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).inv ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ofCocone
@[simps!]
def PushoutCocone.isoMk {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
(Cocones.precompose (diagramIsoSpan.{v} _).inv).obj t ≅
PushoutCocone.mk (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left) (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right)
((t.ι.naturality fst).trans (t.ι.naturality snd).symm) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isoMk
abbrev HasPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
HasLimit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPullback
abbrev HasPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasColimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPushout
abbrev pullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :=
limit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback
abbrev pushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :=
colimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout
abbrev pullback.fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ X :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst
abbrev pullback.snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd
abbrev pushout.inl {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Y ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl
abbrev pushout.inr {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Z ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr
abbrev pullback.lift {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ pullback f g :=
limit.lift _ (PullbackCone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift
abbrev pushout.desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout f g ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (PushoutCocone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.desc
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.fst (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.snd (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inl (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inr (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_fst {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.fst = h :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_snd {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.snd = k :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_snd
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inl_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inl ≫ pushout.desc h k w = h :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_desc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inr_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inr ≫ pushout.desc h k w = k :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_desc
def pullback.lift' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ pullback f g // l ≫ pullback.fst = h ∧ l ≫ pullback.snd = k } :=
⟨pullback.lift h k w, pullback.lift_fst _ _ _, pullback.lift_snd _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift'
def pullback.desc' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : pushout f g ⟶ W // pushout.inl ≫ l = h ∧ pushout.inr ≫ l = k } :=
⟨pushout.desc h k w, pushout.inl_desc _ _ _, pushout.inr_desc _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.desc'
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) ≫ f = pullback.snd ≫ g :=
PullbackCone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.condition
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] :
f ≫ (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) = g ≫ pushout.inr :=
PushoutCocone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.condition
abbrev pullback.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂] (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ pullback g₁ g₂ :=
pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ i₁) (pullback.snd ≫ i₂)
(by simp [← eq₁, ← eq₂, pullback.condition_assoc])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map
abbrev pullback.mapDesc {X Y S T : C} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] : pullback f g ⟶ pullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) :=
pullback.map f g (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc
abbrev pushout.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂] (g₁ : T ⟶ Y)
(g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) : pushout f₁ f₂ ⟶ pushout g₁ g₂ :=
pushout.desc (i₁ ≫ pushout.inl) (i₂ ≫ pushout.inr)
(by
simp only [← Category.assoc, eq₁, eq₂]
simp [pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map
abbrev pushout.mapLift {X Y S T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] : pushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) ⟶ pushout f g :=
pushout.map (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) f g (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift
@[ext 1100]
theorem pullback.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] {W : C}
{k l : W ⟶ pullback f g} (h₀ : k ≫ pullback.fst = l ≫ pullback.fst)
(h₁ : k ≫ pullback.snd = l ≫ pullback.snd) : k = l :=
limit.hom_ext <| PullbackCone.equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.hom_ext
def pullbackIsPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) pullback.snd pullback.condition) :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => pullback.lift s.fst s.snd s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsPullback
instance pullback.fst_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono g] :
Mono (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst_of_mono
instance pullback.snd_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono f] :
Mono (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd_of_mono
instance mono_pullback_to_prod {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasPullback f g] [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
Mono (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.fst) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.snd) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.mono_pullback_to_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.mono_pullback_to_prod
@[ext 1100]
theorem pushout.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] {W : C}
{k l : pushout f g ⟶ W} (h₀ : pushout.inl ≫ k = pushout.inl ≫ l)
(h₁ : pushout.inr ≫ k = pushout.inr ≫ l) : k = l :=
colimit.hom_ext <| PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.hom_ext
def pushoutIsPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f g) pushout.inr pushout.condition) :=
PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => pushout.desc s.inl s.inr s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsPushout
instance pushout.inl_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi g] :
Epi (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_of_epi
instance pushout.inr_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi f] :
Epi (pushout.inr : Z ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_of_epi
instance epi_coprod_to_pushout {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
[HasPushout f g] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] :
Epi (coprod.desc pushout.inl pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inl ≫ f) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inr ≫ f) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout
instance pullback.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map_isIso
@[simps! hom]
def pullback.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] : pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pullback.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] :
(pullback.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pullback.lift_fst]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_fst_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
· erw [pullback.lift_snd]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_snd_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom_inv
instance pushout.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : T ⟶ Y) (g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pushout.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map_isIso
theorem pullback.mapDesc_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (i : T ⟶ S) (i' : S ⟶ S')
[HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] [HasPullback (f ≫ i ≫ i') (g ≫ i ≫ i')]
[HasPullback ((f ≫ i) ≫ i') ((g ≫ i) ≫ i')] :
pullback.mapDesc f g (i ≫ i') = pullback.mapDesc f g i ≫ pullback.mapDesc _ _ i' ≫
(pullback.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc_comp
@[simps! hom]
def pushout.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] : pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pushout f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pushout.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] :
(pushout.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
· erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom_inv
theorem pushout.mapLift_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) (i' : S' ⟶ S)
[HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] [HasPushout (i' ≫ i ≫ f) (i' ≫ i ≫ g)]
[HasPushout ((i' ≫ i) ≫ f) ((i' ≫ i) ≫ g)] :
pushout.mapLift f g (i' ≫ i) =
(pushout.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom ≫
pushout.mapLift _ _ i' ≫ pushout.mapLift f g i := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift_comp
section
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
def pullbackComparison (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
G.obj (pullback f g) ⟶ pullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
pullback.lift (G.map pullback.fst) (G.map pullback.snd)
(by simp only [← G.map_comp, pullback.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackComparison_comp_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pullbackComparison G f g ≫ pullback.fst = G.map pullback.fst :=
pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackComparison_comp_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pullbackComparison G f g ≫ pullback.snd = G.map pullback.snd :=
pullback.lift_snd _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison_comp_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison_comp_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_lift_pullbackComparison (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] {W : C} {h : W ⟶ X} {k : W ⟶ Y} (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
G.map (pullback.lift _ _ w) ≫ pullbackComparison G f g =
pullback.lift (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) := by
ext <;> simp [← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.map_lift_pullback_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.map_lift_pullbackComparison
def pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pushout (G.map f) (G.map g) ⟶ G.obj (pushout f g) :=
pushout.desc (G.map pushout.inl) (G.map pushout.inr)
(by simp only [← G.map_comp, pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] : pushout.inl ≫ pushoutComparison G f g = G.map pushout.inl :=
pushout.inl_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_comp_pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] : pushout.inr ≫ pushoutComparison G f g = G.map pushout.inr :=
pushout.inr_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inr_comp_pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_comp_pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pushoutComparison_map_desc (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] {W : C} {h : Y ⟶ W} {k : Z ⟶ W} (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) :
pushoutComparison G f g ≫ G.map (pushout.desc _ _ w) =
pushout.desc (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) := by
ext <;> simp [← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_comparison_map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutComparison_map_desc
end
section PushoutSymmetry
open WalkingCospan
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
theorem hasPushout_symmetry [HasPushout f g] : HasPushout g f :=
⟨⟨⟨_, PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout f g)⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_symmetry
attribute [local instance] hasPushout_symmetry
def pushoutSymmetry [HasPushout f g] : pushout f g ≅ pushout g f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso
(PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout f g)) (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutSymmetry
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).hom = pushout.inr :=
(colimit.isColimit (span f g)).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
(PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout g f)) _
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_symmetry_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).hom = pushout.inl :=
(colimit.isColimit (span f g)).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
(PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout g f)) _
#align category_theory.limits.inr_comp_pushout_symmetry_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).inv = pushout.inr := by simp [Iso.comp_inv_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_symmetry_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean | 1,613 | 1,614 | theorem inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).inv = pushout.inl := by | simp [Iso.comp_inv_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
#align_import computability.tm_to_partrec from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6155d4351090a6fad236e3d2e4e0e4e7342668e8"
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
namespace ToPartrec
inductive Code
| zero'
| succ
| tail
| cons : Code → Code → Code
| comp : Code → Code → Code
| case : Code → Code → Code
| fix : Code → Code
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align turing.to_partrec.code Turing.ToPartrec.Code
#align turing.to_partrec.code.zero' Turing.ToPartrec.Code.zero'
#align turing.to_partrec.code.succ Turing.ToPartrec.Code.succ
#align turing.to_partrec.code.tail Turing.ToPartrec.Code.tail
#align turing.to_partrec.code.cons Turing.ToPartrec.Code.cons
#align turing.to_partrec.code.comp Turing.ToPartrec.Code.comp
#align turing.to_partrec.code.case Turing.ToPartrec.Code.case
#align turing.to_partrec.code.fix Turing.ToPartrec.Code.fix
def Code.eval : Code → List ℕ →. List ℕ
| Code.zero' => fun v => pure (0 :: v)
| Code.succ => fun v => pure [v.headI.succ]
| Code.tail => fun v => pure v.tail
| Code.cons f fs => fun v => do
let n ← Code.eval f v
let ns ← Code.eval fs v
pure (n.headI :: ns)
| Code.comp f g => fun v => g.eval v >>= f.eval
| Code.case f g => fun v => v.headI.rec (f.eval v.tail) fun y _ => g.eval (y::v.tail)
| Code.fix f =>
PFun.fix fun v => (f.eval v).map fun v => if v.headI = 0 then Sum.inl v.tail else Sum.inr v.tail
#align turing.to_partrec.code.eval Turing.ToPartrec.Code.eval
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
namespace PartrecToTM2
section
open ToPartrec
inductive Γ'
| consₗ
| cons
| bit0
| bit1
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Γ' Turing.PartrecToTM2.Γ'
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Γ'.Cons Turing.PartrecToTM2.Γ'.consₗ
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Γ'.cons Turing.PartrecToTM2.Γ'.cons
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Γ'.bit0 Turing.PartrecToTM2.Γ'.bit0
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Γ'.bit1 Turing.PartrecToTM2.Γ'.bit1
inductive K'
| main
| rev
| aux
| stack
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K' Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.main Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.main
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.rev Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.rev
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.aux Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.aux
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.stack Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.stack
open K'
inductive Cont'
| halt
| cons₁ : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| cons₂ : Cont' → Cont'
| comp : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| fix : Code → Cont' → Cont'
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont' Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cont'
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont'.halt Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cont'.halt
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont'.cons₁ Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cont'.cons₁
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont'.cons₂ Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cont'.cons₂
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont'.comp Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cont'.comp
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont'.fix Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cont'.fix
inductive Λ'
| move (p : Γ' → Bool) (k₁ k₂ : K') (q : Λ')
| clear (p : Γ' → Bool) (k : K') (q : Λ')
| copy (q : Λ')
| push (k : K') (s : Option Γ' → Option Γ') (q : Λ')
| read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')
| succ (q : Λ')
| pred (q₁ q₂ : Λ')
| ret (k : Cont')
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ' Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.move Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.move
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.clear Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.clear
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.copy Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.copy
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.push Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.push
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.read Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.read
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.succ Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.succ
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.pred Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.pred
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.ret Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.ret
-- Porting note: `Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.rec` is noncomputable in Lean4, so we make it computable.
compile_inductive% Code
compile_inductive% Cont'
compile_inductive% K'
compile_inductive% Λ'
instance Λ'.instInhabited : Inhabited Λ' :=
⟨Λ'.ret Cont'.halt⟩
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.inhabited Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.instInhabited
instance Λ'.instDecidableEq : DecidableEq Λ' := fun a b => by
induction a generalizing b <;> cases b <;> first
| apply Decidable.isFalse; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩; done
| exact decidable_of_iff' _ (by simp [Function.funext_iff]; rfl)
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.Λ'.decidable_eq Turing.PartrecToTM2.Λ'.instDecidableEq
def Stmt' :=
TM2.Stmt (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.stmt' Turing.PartrecToTM2.Stmt'
def Cfg' :=
TM2.Cfg (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cfg' Turing.PartrecToTM2.Cfg'
open TM2.Stmt
@[simp]
def natEnd : Γ' → Bool
| Γ'.consₗ => true
| Γ'.cons => true
| _ => false
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.nat_end Turing.PartrecToTM2.natEnd
@[simp]
def pop' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
pop k fun _ v => v
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.pop' Turing.PartrecToTM2.pop'
@[simp]
def peek' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
peek k fun _ v => v
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.peek' Turing.PartrecToTM2.peek'
@[simp]
def push' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
push k fun x => x.iget
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.push' Turing.PartrecToTM2.push'
def unrev :=
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev main
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.unrev Turing.PartrecToTM2.unrev
def moveExcl (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ <| Λ'.push k₁ id q
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.move_excl Turing.PartrecToTM2.moveExcl
def move₂ (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
moveExcl p k₁ rev <| Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev k₂ q
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.move₂ Turing.PartrecToTM2.move₂
def head (k : K') (q : Λ') : Λ' :=
Λ'.move natEnd k rev <|
(Λ'.push rev fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <|
Λ'.read fun s =>
(if s = some Γ'.consₗ then id else Λ'.clear (fun x => x = Γ'.consₗ) k) <| unrev q
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.head Turing.PartrecToTM2.head
@[simp]
def trNormal : Code → Cont' → Λ'
| Code.zero', k => (Λ'.push main fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.succ, k => head main <| Λ'.succ <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.tail, k => Λ'.clear natEnd main <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.cons f fs, k =>
(Λ'.push stack fun _ => some Γ'.consₗ) <|
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) main rev <| Λ'.copy <| trNormal f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)
| Code.comp f g, k => trNormal g (Cont'.comp f k)
| Code.case f g, k => Λ'.pred (trNormal f k) (trNormal g k)
| Code.fix f, k => trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_normal Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNormal
def tr : Λ' → Stmt'
| Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q =>
pop' k₁ <|
branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)
| Λ'.push k f q =>
branch (fun s => (f s).isSome) ((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q)
(goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.read q => goto q
| Λ'.clear p k q =>
pop' k <| branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)
| Λ'.copy q =>
pop' rev <|
branch Option.isSome (push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.succ q =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1) ((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =>
goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k) => goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k) => goto fun _ => trNormal f k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k) =>
pop' main <|
goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
| Λ'.ret Cont'.halt => (load fun _ => none) <| halt
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr Turing.PartrecToTM2.tr
theorem tr_move (p k₁ k₂ q) : tr (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q) =
pop' k₁ (branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)) := rfl
theorem tr_push (k f q) : tr (Λ'.push k f q) = branch (fun s => (f s).isSome)
((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => q) := rfl
theorem tr_read (q) : tr (Λ'.read q) = goto q := rfl
theorem tr_clear (p k q) : tr (Λ'.clear p k q) = pop' k (branch
(fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)) := rfl
theorem tr_copy (q) : tr (Λ'.copy q) = pop' rev (branch Option.isSome
(push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)) := rfl
theorem tr_succ (q) : tr (Λ'.succ q) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)) := rfl
theorem tr_pred (q₁ q₂) : tr (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))) := rfl
theorem tr_ret_cons₁ (fs k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)) = goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := rfl
theorem tr_ret_cons₂ (k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k)) =
goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k := rfl
theorem tr_ret_comp (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k)) = goto fun _ => trNormal f k := rfl
theorem tr_ret_fix (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k)) = pop' main (goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) := rfl
theorem tr_ret_halt : tr (Λ'.ret Cont'.halt) = (load fun _ => none) halt := rfl
attribute
[eqns tr_move tr_push tr_read tr_clear tr_copy tr_succ tr_pred tr_ret_cons₁
tr_ret_cons₂ tr_ret_comp tr_ret_fix tr_ret_halt] tr
attribute [simp] tr
def trCont : Cont → Cont'
| Cont.halt => Cont'.halt
| Cont.cons₁ c _ k => Cont'.cons₁ c (trCont k)
| Cont.cons₂ _ k => Cont'.cons₂ (trCont k)
| Cont.comp c k => Cont'.comp c (trCont k)
| Cont.fix c k => Cont'.fix c (trCont k)
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_cont Turing.PartrecToTM2.trCont
def trPosNum : PosNum → List Γ'
| PosNum.one => [Γ'.bit1]
| PosNum.bit0 n => Γ'.bit0 :: trPosNum n
| PosNum.bit1 n => Γ'.bit1 :: trPosNum n
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_pos_num Turing.PartrecToTM2.trPosNum
def trNum : Num → List Γ'
| Num.zero => []
| Num.pos n => trPosNum n
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_num Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNum
def trNat (n : ℕ) : List Γ' :=
trNum n
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_nat Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNat
@[simp]
theorem trNat_zero : trNat 0 = [] := by rw [trNat, Nat.cast_zero]; rfl
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_nat_zero Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNat_zero
theorem trNat_default : trNat default = [] :=
trNat_zero
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_nat_default Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNat_default
@[simp]
def trList : List ℕ → List Γ'
| [] => []
| n::ns => trNat n ++ Γ'.cons :: trList ns
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_list Turing.PartrecToTM2.trList
@[simp]
def trLList : List (List ℕ) → List Γ'
| [] => []
| l::ls => trList l ++ Γ'.consₗ :: trLList ls
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_llist Turing.PartrecToTM2.trLList
@[simp]
def contStack : Cont → List (List ℕ)
| Cont.halt => []
| Cont.cons₁ _ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.cons₂ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.comp _ k => contStack k
| Cont.fix _ k => contStack k
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.cont_stack Turing.PartrecToTM2.contStack
def trContStack (k : Cont) :=
trLList (contStack k)
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_cont_stack Turing.PartrecToTM2.trContStack
def K'.elim (a b c d : List Γ') : K' → List Γ'
| K'.main => a
| K'.rev => b
| K'.aux => c
| K'.stack => d
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.elim Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.elim
-- The equation lemma of `elim` simplifies to `match` structures.
theorem K'.elim_main (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.main = a := rfl
theorem K'.elim_rev (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.rev = b := rfl
theorem K'.elim_aux (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.aux = c := rfl
theorem K'.elim_stack (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.stack = d := rfl
attribute [simp] K'.elim
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_main {a b c d a'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) main a' = K'.elim a' b c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.elim_update_main Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.elim_update_main
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_rev {a b c d b'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) rev b' = K'.elim a b' c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.elim_update_rev Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.elim_update_rev
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_aux {a b c d c'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) aux c' = K'.elim a b c' d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.elim_update_aux Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.elim_update_aux
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_stack {a b c d d'} :
update (K'.elim a b c d) stack d' = K'.elim a b c d' := by funext x; cases x <;> rfl
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.K'.elim_update_stack Turing.PartrecToTM2.K'.elim_update_stack
def halt (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨none, none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.halt Turing.PartrecToTM2.halt
def TrCfg : Cfg → Cfg' → Prop
| Cfg.ret k v, c' =>
∃ s, c' = ⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩
| Cfg.halt v, c' => c' = halt v
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_cfg Turing.PartrecToTM2.TrCfg
def splitAtPred {α} (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α × Option α × List α
| [] => ([], none, [])
| a :: as =>
cond (p a) ([], some a, as) <|
let ⟨l₁, o, l₂⟩ := splitAtPred p as
⟨a::l₁, o, l₂⟩
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.split_at_pred Turing.PartrecToTM2.splitAtPred
theorem splitAtPred_eq {α} (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L l₁ o l₂,
(∀ x ∈ l₁, p x = false) →
Option.elim' (L = l₁ ∧ l₂ = []) (fun a => p a = true ∧ L = l₁ ++ a::l₂) o →
splitAtPred p L = (l₁, o, l₂)
| [], _, none, _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
| [], l₁, some o, l₂, _, ⟨_, h₃⟩ => by simp at h₃
| a :: L, l₁, o, l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [splitAtPred]
have IH := splitAtPred_eq p L
cases' o with o
· cases' l₁ with a' l₁ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨⟩, rfl⟩
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH L none [] _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩]
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
· cases' l₁ with a' l₁ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨h₂, ⟨⟩⟩
· rw [h₂, cond]
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH l₁ (some o) l₂ _ ⟨h₂, _⟩] <;> try rfl
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.split_at_pred_eq Turing.PartrecToTM2.splitAtPred_eq
theorem splitAtPred_false {α} (L : List α) : splitAtPred (fun _ => false) L = (L, none, []) :=
splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => rfl) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.split_at_pred_ff Turing.PartrecToTM2.splitAtPred_false
theorem move_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ k₂)
(e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, o, update (update S k₁ L₂) k₂ (L₁.reverseAux (S k₂))⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· rw [(_ : [].reverseAux _ = _), Function.update_eq_self]
swap
· rw [Function.update_noteq h₁.symm, List.reverseAux_nil]
refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim, ne_eq]
revert e; cases' S k₁ with a Sk <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons, Option.iget_some] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and] at e ⊢
simp only [e]
rfl
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim, ne_eq, List.reverseAux_cons]
cases' e₁ : S k₁ with a' Sk <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, ne_eq, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update (update S k₁ Sk) k₂ (a :: S k₂)) _ using 2 <;>
simp [Function.update_noteq, h₁, h₁.symm, e₃, List.reverseAux]
simp [Function.update_comm h₁.symm]
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.move_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.move_ok
theorem unrev_ok {q s} {S : K' → List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (unrev q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S rev []) main (List.reverseAux (S rev) (S main))⟩ :=
move_ok (by decide) <| splitAtPred_false _
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.unrev_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.unrev_ok
theorem move₂_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ rev ∧ k₂ ≠ rev ∧ k₁ ≠ k₂)
(h₂ : S rev = []) (e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (move₂ p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S k₁ (o.elim id List.cons L₂)) k₂ (L₁ ++ S k₂)⟩ := by
refine (move_ok h₁.1 e).trans (TransGen.head rfl ?_)
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, id_eq, ne_eq, Option.elim]
cases o <;> simp only [Option.elim, id]
· simp only [TM2.stepAux, Option.isSome, cond_false]
convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [Function.update_comm h₁.1, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_noteq h₁.2.2.symm, Function.update_noteq h₁.2.1,
Function.update_noteq h₁.1.symm, List.reverseAux_eq, h₂, Function.update_same,
List.append_nil, List.reverse_reverse]
· simp only [TM2.stepAux, Option.isSome, cond_true]
convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [h₂, Function.update_comm h₁.1, List.reverseAux_eq, Function.update_same,
List.append_nil, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_noteq h₁.1.symm, Function.update_noteq h₁.2.2.symm,
Function.update_noteq h₁.2.1, Function.update_same, List.reverse_reverse]
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.move₂_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.move₂_ok
theorem clear_ok {p k q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (e : splitAtPred p (S k) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.clear p k q), s, S⟩ ⟨some q, o, update S k L₂⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
revert e; cases' S k with a Sk <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and] at e ⊢
rcases e with ⟨e₁, e₂⟩
rw [e₁, e₂]
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
cases' e₁ : S k with a' Sk <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update S k Sk) _ using 2 <;> simp [e₃]
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.clear_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.clear_ok
theorem copy_ok (q s a b c d) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.copy q), s, K'.elim a b c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (List.reverseAux b a) [] c (List.reverseAux b d)⟩ := by
induction' b with x b IH generalizing a d s
· refine TransGen.single ?_
simp
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_rev, List.head?_cons, Option.isSome_some,
List.tail_cons, elim_update_rev, ne_eq, Function.update_noteq, elim_main, elim_update_main,
elim_stack, elim_update_stack, cond_true, List.reverseAux_cons]
exact IH _ _ _
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.copy_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.copy_ok
theorem trPosNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trPosNum n, natEnd x = false
| PosNum.one, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
| PosNum.bit1 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit1 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_pos_num_nat_end Turing.PartrecToTM2.trPosNum_natEnd
theorem trNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trNum n, natEnd x = false
| Num.pos n, x, h => trPosNum_natEnd n x h
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_num_nat_end Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNum_natEnd
theorem trNat_natEnd (n) : ∀ x ∈ trNat n, natEnd x = false :=
trNum_natEnd _
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_nat_nat_end Turing.PartrecToTM2.trNat_natEnd
theorem trList_ne_consₗ : ∀ (l), ∀ x ∈ trList l, x ≠ Γ'.consₗ
| a :: l, x, h => by
simp [trList] at h
obtain h | rfl | h := h
· rintro rfl
cases trNat_natEnd _ _ h
· rintro ⟨⟩
· exact trList_ne_consₗ l _ h
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.tr_list_ne_Cons Turing.PartrecToTM2.trList_ne_consₗ
theorem head_main_ok {q s L} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (head main q), s, K'.elim (trList L) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [L.headI]) [] c d⟩ := by
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn L none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat L.headI) o (trList L.tail) (trNat_natEnd _) ?_)).trans
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
· cases L <;> simp [o]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_update_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev,
Function.update_same, trList]
rw [if_neg (show o ≠ some Γ'.consₗ by cases L <;> simp [o])]
refine (clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ none [] ?_ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)).trans ?_
· exact fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)
convert unrev_ok using 2; simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.head_main_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.head_main_ok
theorem head_stack_ok {q s L₁ L₂ L₃} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (head stack q), s, K'.elim (trList L₁) [] [] (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList (L₂.headI :: L₁)) [] [] L₃⟩ := by
cases' L₂ with a L₂
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ [] (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃ (by rintro _ ⟨⟩) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_true, id_eq, trList, List.nil_append,
elim_update_stack, elim_rev, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_rev, Function.update_same,
List.headI_nil, trNat_default]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat a) (some Γ'.cons) (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)
(trNat_natEnd _) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_false, trList, List.append_assoc,
List.cons_append, elim_update_stack, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_same,
List.headI_cons]
refine
TransGen.trans
(clear_ok
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trList L₂) (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.head_stack_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.head_stack_ok
theorem succ_ok {q s n} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.succ q), s, K'.elim (trList [n]) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [n.succ]) [] c d⟩ := by
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one]
cases' (n : Num) with a
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, decide_False, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_noteq, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, decide_True, Function.update_same,
cond_true, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 1
simp only [elim_update_rev, elim_rev, elim_main, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_main]
rfl
simp only [trNum, Num.succ, Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a.succ) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some q.succ, s, K'.elim (trPosNum a ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp? [List.reverseAux] at e says simp only [List.reverseAux] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m _ generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, [Γ'.bit1], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (Γ'.bit0 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp [PosNum.succ, trPosNum]
rfl
· refine ⟨l₁, _, some Γ'.bit0, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, elim_update_main, ne_eq, Function.update_noteq,
elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_same, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq]
rfl
#align turing.partrec_to_TM2.succ_ok Turing.PartrecToTM2.succ_ok
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 1,545 | 1,588 | theorem pred_ok (q₁ q₂ s v) (c d : List Γ') : ∃ s',
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] c d⟩
(v.headI.rec ⟨some q₁, s', K'.elim (trList v.tail) [] c d⟩ fun n _ =>
⟨some q₂, s', K'.elim (trList (n::v.tail)) [] c d⟩) := by |
rcases v with (_ | ⟨_ | n, v⟩)
· refine ⟨none, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
· refine ⟨some Γ'.cons, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
refine ⟨none, ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, trNum, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ,
List.tail_cons, List.headI_cons]
cases' (n : Num) with a
· simp [trPosNum, trNum, show Num.zero.succ' = PosNum.one from rfl]
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, List.head?_cons, Option.some.injEq,
decide_False, List.tail_cons, elim_update_main, ne_eq, Function.update_noteq, elim_rev,
elim_update_rev, natEnd, Function.update_same, cond_true, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
simp only [Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (q₁.pred q₂), s, K'.elim (trPosNum a.succ ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q₂), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp only [List.reverseAux] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m IH generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit1::l₁, [], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum, show PosNum.one.succ = PosNum.one.bit0 from rfl]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (some Γ'.bit0) (Γ'.bit1 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp
rfl
· obtain ⟨a, l, e, h⟩ : ∃ a l, (trPosNum m = a::l) ∧ natEnd a = false := by
cases m <;> refine ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, _, some a, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp [trPosNum, PosNum.succ, e, h, show some Γ'.bit1 ≠ some Γ'.bit0 by decide,
Option.iget, -natEnd]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
floor : α → ℕ
ceil : α → ℕ
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
floor : α → ℤ
ceil : α → ℤ
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
#align int.fract_int_cast Int.fract_intCast
@[simp]
theorem fract_natCast (n : ℕ) : fract (n : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_nat_cast Int.fract_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : α) = 0 :=
fract_natCast n
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem fract_floor (a : α) : fract (⌊a⌋ : α) = 0 :=
fract_intCast _
#align int.fract_floor Int.fract_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_fract (a : α) : ⌊fract a⌋ = 0 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff, Int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.floor_fract Int.floor_fract
theorem fract_eq_iff {a b : α} : fract a = b ↔ 0 ≤ b ∧ b < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, ⟨⌊a⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩,
by
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, z, hz⟩
rw [← self_sub_floor, eq_comm, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, hz,
Int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ← hz]
constructor <;> simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] ⟩
#align int.fract_eq_iff Int.fract_eq_iff
theorem fract_eq_fract {a b : α} : fract a = fract b ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => ⟨⌊a⌋ - ⌊b⌋, by unfold fract at h; rw [Int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h]⟩,
by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
refine fract_eq_iff.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, z + ⌊b⌋, ?_⟩
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, add_comm, Int.cast_add]
exact add_sub_sub_cancel _ _ _⟩
#align int.fract_eq_fract Int.fract_eq_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_eq_self {a : α} : fract a = a ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ a < 1 :=
fract_eq_iff.trans <| and_assoc.symm.trans <| and_iff_left ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align int.fract_eq_self Int.fract_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (a : α) : fract (fract a) = fract a :=
fract_eq_self.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.fract_fract Int.fract_fract
theorem fract_add (a b : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (a + b) - fract a - fract b = z :=
⟨⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ - ⌊a + b⌋, by
unfold fract
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, cast_add, cast_neg]
abel⟩
#align int.fract_add Int.fract_add
theorem fract_neg {x : α} (hx : fract x ≠ 0) : fract (-x) = 1 - fract x := by
rw [fract_eq_iff]
constructor
· rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]
exact (fract_lt_one x).le
refine ⟨sub_lt_self _ (lt_of_le_of_ne' (fract_nonneg x) hx), -⌊x⌋ - 1, ?_⟩
simp only [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, cast_sub, cast_neg, cast_one, sub_left_inj]
conv in -x => rw [← floor_add_fract x]
simp [-floor_add_fract]
#align int.fract_neg Int.fract_neg
@[simp]
theorem fract_neg_eq_zero {x : α} : fract (-x) = 0 ↔ fract x = 0 := by
simp only [fract_eq_iff, le_refl, zero_lt_one, tsub_zero, true_and_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ <;> use -z <;> simp [← hz]
#align int.fract_neg_eq_zero Int.fract_neg_eq_zero
theorem fract_mul_nat (a : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract a * b - fract (a * b) = z := by
induction' b with c hc
· use 0; simp
· rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
rcases fract_add (a * c) a with ⟨y, hy⟩
use z - y
rw [Int.cast_sub, ← hz, ← hy]
abel
#align int.fract_mul_nat Int.fract_mul_nat
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
theorem preimage_fract (s : Set α) :
fract ⁻¹' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x => x - (m:α)) ⁻¹' (s ∩ Ico (0 : α) 1) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⌊x⌋, h, fract_nonneg x, fract_lt_one x⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨m, hms, hm0, hm1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊x⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 hm0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 hm1⟩
exact hms
#align int.preimage_fract Int.preimage_fract
theorem image_fract (s : Set α) : fract '' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x : α => x - m) '' s ∩ Ico 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_image, mem_inter_iff, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⌊y⌋, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, fract_nonneg y, fract_lt_one y⟩
· rintro ⟨m, ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩, h0, h1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊y⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 h0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 h1⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩
#align int.image_fract Int.image_fract
section FloorRingToSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) FloorRing.toFloorSemiring : FloorSemiring α where
floor a := ⌊a⌋.toNat
ceil a := ⌈a⌉.toNat
floor_of_neg {a} ha := Int.toNat_of_nonpos (Int.floor_nonpos ha.le)
gc_floor {a n} ha := by rw [Int.le_toNat (Int.floor_nonneg.2 ha), Int.le_floor, Int.cast_natCast]
gc_ceil a n := by rw [Int.toNat_le, Int.ceil_le, Int.cast_natCast]
#align floor_ring.to_floor_semiring FloorRing.toFloorSemiring
theorem Int.floor_toNat (a : α) : ⌊a⌋.toNat = ⌊a⌋₊ :=
rfl
#align int.floor_to_nat Int.floor_toNat
theorem Int.ceil_toNat (a : α) : ⌈a⌉.toNat = ⌈a⌉₊ :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_to_nat Int.ceil_toNat
@[simp]
theorem Nat.floor_int : (Nat.floor : ℤ → ℕ) = Int.toNat :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_int Nat.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem Nat.ceil_int : (Nat.ceil : ℤ → ℕ) = Int.toNat :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_int Nat.ceil_int
variable {a : α}
theorem Int.ofNat_floor_eq_floor (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : ℤ) = ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.floor_toNat, Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.floor_nonneg.2 ha)]
#align nat.cast_floor_eq_int_floor Int.ofNat_floor_eq_floor
theorem Int.ofNat_ceil_eq_ceil (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : ℤ) = ⌈a⌉ := by
rw [← Int.ceil_toNat, Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.ceil_nonneg ha)]
#align nat.cast_ceil_eq_int_ceil Int.ofNat_ceil_eq_ceil
theorem natCast_floor_eq_intCast_floor (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_floor_eq_floor ha, Int.cast_natCast]
#align nat.cast_floor_eq_cast_int_floor natCast_floor_eq_intCast_floor
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,740 | 1,741 | theorem natCast_ceil_eq_intCast_ceil (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) = ⌈a⌉ := by |
rw [← Int.ofNat_ceil_eq_ceil ha, Int.cast_natCast]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Maximal
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2bbc7e3884ba234309d2a43b19144105a753292e"
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
noncomputable instance FractionalIdeal.semifield : Semifield (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ := coeIdeal_injective.nontrivial
inv_zero := inv_zero' _
div_eq_mul_inv := FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
mul_inv_cancel _ := FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := _
#align fractional_ideal.semifield FractionalIdeal.semifield
instance FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ : CommSemiring (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := inferInstance
#align fractional_ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero
instance Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero : CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Ideal A) :=
{ Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero (coeIdealHom A⁰ (FractionRing A)) coeIdeal_injective
(RingHom.map_zero _) (RingHom.map_one _) (RingHom.map_mul _) (RingHom.map_pow _) with }
#align ideal.cancel_comm_monoid_with_zero Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero
-- Porting note: Lean can infer all it needs by itself
instance Ideal.isDomain : IsDomain (Ideal A) := { }
#align ideal.is_domain Ideal.isDomain
theorem Ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : Ideal A} : I ∣ J ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨Ideal.le_of_dvd, fun h => by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· have hJ : J = ⊥ := by rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h
rw [hI, hJ]
have hI' : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
have : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 :=
le_trans (mul_left_mono (↑I)⁻¹ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal _).mpr h))
(le_of_eq (inv_mul_cancel hI'))
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp this
use H
refine coeIdeal_injective (show (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = ↑(I * H) from ?_)
rw [coeIdeal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hI', one_mul]⟩
#align ideal.dvd_iff_le Ideal.dvd_iff_le
theorem Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt {I J : Ideal A} : DvdNotUnit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨fun ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩ =>
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt
(fun h =>
have : H = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one])
show IsUnit H from this.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
hunit),
fun h =>
dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
#align ideal.dvd_not_unit_iff_lt Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt
instance : WfDvdMonoid (Ideal A) where
wellFounded_dvdNotUnit := by
have : WellFounded ((· > ·) : Ideal A → Ideal A → Prop) :=
isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp (isNoetherianRing_iff.mp IsDedekindRing.toIsNoetherian)
convert this
ext
rw [Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt]
instance Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := by
intro P
exact ⟨fun hirr => ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_unit, fun I J => by
have : P.IsMaximal := by
refine ⟨⟨mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mpr hirr.not_unit, ?_⟩⟩
intro J hJ
obtain ⟨_J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mpr hJ
exact Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp ((hirr.isUnit_or_isUnit P_eq).resolve_right hunit)
rw [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, SetLike.le_def, SetLike.le_def,
SetLike.le_def]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩
exact
⟨x * y, Ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.isPrime.mem_or_mem (not_or_of_not x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩ }
#align ideal.unique_factorization_monoid Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid
instance Ideal.normalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
normalizationMonoidOfUniqueUnits
#align ideal.normalization_monoid Ideal.normalizationMonoid
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : Ideal A} {x : A} : I ∣ Ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
Ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (Ideal.span_le.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff)
#align ideal.dvd_span_singleton Ideal.dvd_span_singleton
theorem Ideal.isPrime_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) : IsPrime P := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
rw [← Ideal.one_eq_top] at h
exact h.not_unit isUnit_one
· simp only [← Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hxy ⊢
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy
#align ideal.is_prime_of_prime Ideal.isPrime_of_prime
theorem Ideal.prime_of_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : IsPrime P) : Prime P := by
refine ⟨hP, mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp h.ne_top, fun I J hIJ => ?_⟩
simpa only [Ideal.dvd_iff_le] using h.mul_le.mp (Ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)
#align ideal.prime_of_is_prime Ideal.prime_of_isPrime
theorem Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) : Prime P ↔ IsPrime P :=
⟨Ideal.isPrime_of_prime, Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP⟩
#align ideal.prime_iff_is_prime Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime
theorem Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : Ideal A} : IsPrime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ Prime P :=
⟨fun hp => (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right fun hp0 => Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hp0 hp, fun hp =>
hp.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_prime) Ideal.isPrime_of_prime⟩
#align ideal.is_prime_iff_bot_or_prime Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.prime_span_singleton_iff {a : A} : Prime (Ideal.span {a}) ↔ Prime a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· rw [Set.singleton_zero, span_zero, ← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_prime_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· have ha' : span {a} ≠ ⊥ := by simpa only [ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot] using ha
rw [Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime ha', Ideal.span_singleton_prime ha]
open Submodule.IsPrincipal in
theorem Ideal.prime_generator_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) [P.IsPrincipal] :
Prime (generator P) :=
have : Ideal.IsPrime P := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime h
prime_generator_of_isPrime _ h.ne_zero
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid in
nonrec theorem Ideal.mem_normalizedFactors_iff {p I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
p ∈ normalizedFactors I ↔ p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p := by
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [← zero_eq_bot] at hI
simp only [hp, zero_not_mem_normalizedFactors, zero_dvd_iff, hI, false_iff, not_and,
not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
· rwa [mem_normalizedFactors_iff hI, prime_iff_isPrime]
theorem Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
StrictAnti (I ^ · : ℕ → Ideal A) :=
strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt fun e =>
Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp ⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt isUnit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ I e⟩
#align ideal.strict_anti_pow Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti
theorem Ideal.pow_lt_self (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) :
I ^ e < I := by
convert I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 he
dsimp only
rw [pow_one]
#align ideal.pow_lt_self Ideal.pow_lt_self
theorem Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I ^ e, x ∉ I ^ (e + 1) :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
#align ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le {P I : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥)
{i : ℕ} (hlt : P ^ (i + 1) < I) (hle : I ≤ P ^ i) : I = P ^ i := by
refine le_antisymm hle ?_
have P_prime' := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP P_prime
have h1 : I ≠ ⊥ := (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hlt).ne'
have := pow_ne_zero i hP
have h3 := pow_ne_zero (i + 1) hP
rw [← Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt, dvdNotUnit_iff_normalizedFactors_lt_normalizedFactors h1 h3,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, Multiset.lt_replicate_succ] at hlt
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_pow,
normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
all_goals assumption
#align ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le
theorem Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow {P : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (i : ℕ) :
P ^ (i + 1) < P ^ i :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.le_succ _))
(mt (pow_eq_pow_iff hP (mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp P_prime.ne_top)).mp i.succ_ne_self)
#align ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow
theorem Associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : Ideal A) :
Associates.mk I ^ n ≤ Associates.mk (Ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I ^ n := by
simp_rw [← Associates.dvd_eq_le, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk,
Ideal.dvd_span_singleton]
#align associates.le_singleton_iff Associates.le_singleton_iff
variable {K}
lemma FractionalIdeal.le_inv_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J⁻¹ ↔ J ≤ I⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, inv_eq, le_div_iff_mul_le hI, le_div_iff_mul_le hJ, mul_comm]
lemma FractionalIdeal.inv_le_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I⁻¹ ≤ J ↔ J⁻¹ ≤ I := by
simpa using le_inv_comm (A := A) (K := K) (inv_ne_zero hI) (inv_ne_zero hJ)
open FractionalIdeal
theorem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem {J : Ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
(f : ι → K) {j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K,
(∀ i ∈ s, IsLocalization.IsInteger A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, a * f i ∉ (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K := spanFinset A s f
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := spanFinset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices ↑J / I < I⁻¹ by
obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this
rw [mem_inv_iff hI0] at hI
refine ⟨a, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
· exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i) (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hi)))
· contrapose! hpI
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr fun y hy => Submodule.span_induction hy ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; exact hpI i hi
· rw [mul_zero]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro x y hx hy; rw [mul_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
· intro b x hx; rw [mul_smul_comm]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ b hx
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc
↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ := div_eq_mul_inv (↑J) I
_ < 1 * I⁻¹ := mul_right_strictMono (inv_ne_zero hI0) ?_
_ = I⁻¹ := one_mul _
rw [← coeIdeal_top]
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact
strictMono_of_le_iff_le (fun _ _ => (coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ)
#align ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem
section Gcd
namespace IsDedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
-- Porting note(#5171): removed `has_nonempty_instance`, linter doesn't exist yet
@[ext, nolint unusedArguments]
structure HeightOneSpectrum where
asIdeal : Ideal R
isPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
ne_bot : asIdeal ≠ ⊥
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
attribute [instance] HeightOneSpectrum.isPrime
variable (v : HeightOneSpectrum R) {R}
section
open Ideal
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal R} {J : Ideal A}
@[simps] -- Porting note: use `Subtype` instead of `Set` to make linter happy
def idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{p : Ideal R // p ∣ I} →o {p : Ideal A // p ∣ J} where
toFun X := ⟨comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)), by
have : RingHom.ker (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) ≤
comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)) :=
ker_le_comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
rw [mk_ker] at this
exact dvd_iff_le.mpr this⟩
monotone' := by
rintro ⟨X, hX⟩ ⟨Y, hY⟩ h
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk] at h ⊢
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Quotient.mk_surjective, map_le_iff_le_comap, Subtype.coe_mk, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf
(map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y)]
suffices map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X ≤ map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y by
exact le_sup_of_le_left this
rwa [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
Quotient.mk_surjective, ← RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker, sup_eq_left.mpr <| le_of_dvd hY]
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_coe_coe idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id :
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (RingHom.id (A ⧸ J)).surjective = OrderHom.id :=
OrderHom.ext _ _
(funext fun X => by
simp only [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, map_id, OrderHom.coe_mk, OrderHom.id_coe, id,
comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) Quotient.mk_surjective, ←
RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot (Ideal.Quotient.mk J), mk_ker,
sup_eq_left.mpr (dvd_iff_le.mp X.prop), Subtype.coe_eta])
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_id idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] {L : Ideal B}
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} {g : A ⧸ J →+* B ⧸ L}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
(idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hg).comp (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hf) =
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (show Function.Surjective (g.comp f) from hg.comp hf) := by
refine OrderHom.ext _ _ (funext fun x => ?_)
rw [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.comp_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk,
OrderHom.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.coe_mk,
Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, map_comap_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Quotient.mk_surjective, map_map]
#align ideal_factors_fun_of_quot_hom_comp idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (f : R ⧸ I ≃+* A ⧸ J)
-- @[simps] -- Porting note: simpNF complains about the lemmas generated by simps
def idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I } ≃o { p : Ideal A | p ∣ J } := by
have f_surj : Function.Surjective (f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J) := f.surjective
have fsym_surj : Function.Surjective (f.symm : A ⧸ J →+* R ⧸ I) := f.symm.surjective
refine OrderIso.ofHomInv (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom f_surj) (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom fsym_surj)
?_ ?_
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp fsym_surj f_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.comp_symm, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp f_surj fsym_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.symm_comp, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm = idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm := rfl
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso {L M : Ideal R} (hL : L ∣ I) (hM : M ∣ I) :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ : Ideal A) ∣ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ↔
L ∣ M := by
suffices
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ≤ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ ↔
(⟨M, hM⟩ : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I }) ≤ ⟨L, hL⟩
by rw [dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le, Subtype.coe_le_coe, this, Subtype.mk_le_mk]
exact (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).le_iff_le
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_is_dvd_iso idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
variable [DecidableEq (Ideal R)] [DecidableEq (Ideal A)]
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
{L : Ideal R} (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
↑(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hL⟩)
∈ normalizedFactors J := by
have hI : I ≠ ⊥ := by
intro hI
rw [hI, bot_eq_zero, normalizedFactors_zero, ← Multiset.empty_eq_zero] at hL
exact Finset.not_mem_empty _ hL
refine mem_normalizedFactors_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
rintro ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f
#align ideal_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_mem_normalized_factors_of_mem_normalized_factors idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors
-- @[simps apply] -- Porting note: simpNF complains about the lemmas generated by simps
def normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
{ L : Ideal R | L ∈ normalizedFactors I } ≃ { M : Ideal A | M ∈ normalizedFactors J } where
toFun j :=
⟨idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩,
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f hJ j.prop⟩
invFun j :=
⟨(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩, by
rw [idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm]
exact
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f.symm hI
j.prop⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by
simp
-- This used to be the end of the proof before leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
#align normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv
@[simp]
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ).symm =
normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm hJ hI := rfl
#align normalized_factors_equiv_of_quot_equiv_symm normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm
variable [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : Ideal R → Ideal R → Prop)]
variable [DecidableRel ((· ∣ ·) : Ideal A → Ideal A → Prop)]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 1,188 | 1,194 | theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_multiplicity_eq_multiplicity (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
(L : Ideal R) (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
multiplicity (↑(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ ⟨L, hL⟩)) J = multiplicity L I := by |
rw [normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine multiplicity_factor_dvd_iso_eq_multiplicity_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
exact fun ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩ => idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f hl hl'
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.well_known from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8199f6717c150a7fe91c4534175f4cf99725978f"
namespace PowerSeries
section Field
variable (A A' : Type*) [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A']
open Nat
def exp : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !)
#align power_series.exp PowerSeries.exp
def sin : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then 0 else algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !)
#align power_series.sin PowerSeries.sin
def cos : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !) else 0
#align power_series.cos PowerSeries.cos
variable {A A'} [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A'] (n : ℕ) (f : A →+* A')
@[simp]
theorem coeff_exp : coeff A n (exp A) = algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !) :=
coeff_mk _ _
#align power_series.coeff_exp PowerSeries.coeff_exp
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_exp : constantCoeff A (exp A) = 1 := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_exp]
simp
#align power_series.constant_coeff_exp PowerSeries.constantCoeff_exp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/WellKnown.lean | 181 | 182 | theorem coeff_sin_bit0 : coeff A (bit0 n) (sin A) = 0 := by |
rw [sin, coeff_mk, if_pos (even_bit0 n)]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finrank
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.InvariantBasisNumber
#align_import linear_algebra.dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a5f8186becdbc826190ced4312f8199f9db6a5"
noncomputable section
universe u v w w'
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
section StrongRankCondition
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
open Submodule
-- An auxiliary lemma for `linearIndependent_le_span'`,
-- with the additional assumption that the linearly independent family is finite.
theorem linearIndependent_le_span_aux' {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : ι → M)
(i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M) [Fintype w] (s : range v ≤ span R w) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
-- We construct an injective linear map `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] (w → R)`,
-- by thinking of `f : ι → R` as a linear combination of the finite family `v`,
-- and expressing that (using the axiom of choice) as a linear combination over `w`.
-- We can do this linearly by constructing the map on a basis.
fapply card_le_of_injective' R
· apply Finsupp.total
exact fun i => Span.repr R w ⟨v i, s (mem_range_self i)⟩
· intro f g h
apply_fun Finsupp.total w M R (↑) at h
simp only [Finsupp.total_total, Submodule.coe_mk, Span.finsupp_total_repr] at h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← LinearMap.map_sub] at h
exact sub_eq_zero.mp (linearIndependent_iff.mp i _ h)
#align linear_independent_le_span_aux' linearIndependent_le_span_aux'
lemma LinearIndependent.finite_of_le_span_finite {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v)
(w : Set M) [Finite w] (s : range v ≤ span R w) : Finite ι :=
letI := Fintype.ofFinite w
Fintype.finite <| fintypeOfFinsetCardLe (Fintype.card w) fun t => by
let v' := fun x : (t : Set ι) => v x
have i' : LinearIndependent R v' := i.comp _ Subtype.val_injective
have s' : range v' ≤ span R w := (range_comp_subset_range _ _).trans s
simpa using linearIndependent_le_span_aux' v' i' w s'
#align linear_independent_fintype_of_le_span_fintype LinearIndependent.finite_of_le_span_finite
theorem linearIndependent_le_span' {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M)
[Fintype w] (s : range v ≤ span R w) : #ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
haveI : Finite ι := i.finite_of_le_span_finite v w s
letI := Fintype.ofFinite ι
rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype]
simp only [Cardinal.natCast_le]
exact linearIndependent_le_span_aux' v i w s
#align linear_independent_le_span' linearIndependent_le_span'
theorem linearIndependent_le_span {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M)
[Fintype w] (s : span R w = ⊤) : #ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
apply linearIndependent_le_span' v i w
rw [s]
exact le_top
#align linear_independent_le_span linearIndependent_le_span
theorem linearIndependent_le_span_finset {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v)
(w : Finset M) (s : span R (w : Set M) = ⊤) : #ι ≤ w.card := by
simpa only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe] using linearIndependent_le_span v i w s
#align linear_independent_le_span_finset linearIndependent_le_span_finset
theorem linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis {ι : Type w} (b : Basis ι R M) [Infinite ι] {κ : Type w}
(v : κ → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) : #κ ≤ #ι := by
classical
by_contra h
rw [not_le, ← Cardinal.mk_finset_of_infinite ι] at h
let Φ := fun k : κ => (b.repr (v k)).support
obtain ⟨s, w : Infinite ↑(Φ ⁻¹' {s})⟩ := Cardinal.exists_infinite_fiber Φ h (by infer_instance)
let v' := fun k : Φ ⁻¹' {s} => v k
have i' : LinearIndependent R v' := i.comp _ Subtype.val_injective
have w' : Finite (Φ ⁻¹' {s}) := by
apply i'.finite_of_le_span_finite v' (s.image b)
rintro m ⟨⟨p, ⟨rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Finset.coe_image]
apply Basis.mem_span_repr_support
exact w.false
#align linear_independent_le_infinite_basis linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/StrongRankCondition.lean | 266 | 276 | theorem linearIndependent_le_basis {ι : Type w} (b : Basis ι R M) {κ : Type w} (v : κ → M)
(i : LinearIndependent R v) : #κ ≤ #ι := by |
classical
-- We split into cases depending on whether `ι` is infinite.
cases fintypeOrInfinite ι
· rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype ι] -- When `ι` is finite, we have `linearIndependent_le_span`,
haveI : Nontrivial R := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.ofInjective b b.injective)]
exact linearIndependent_le_span v i (range b) b.span_eq
· -- and otherwise we have `linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis`.
exact linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis b v i
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.InjSurj
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.congruence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f39bcbc98f8255490f8d4562762c9467694c809"
structure RingCon (R : Type*) [Add R] [Mul R] extends Con R, AddCon R where
#align ring_con RingCon
add_decl_doc RingCon.toCon
add_decl_doc RingCon.toAddCon
variable {α R : Type*}
inductive RingConGen.Rel [Add R] [Mul R] (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of : ∀ x y, r x y → RingConGen.Rel r x y
| refl : ∀ x, RingConGen.Rel r x x
| symm : ∀ {x y}, RingConGen.Rel r x y → RingConGen.Rel r y x
| trans : ∀ {x y z}, RingConGen.Rel r x y → RingConGen.Rel r y z → RingConGen.Rel r x z
| add : ∀ {w x y z}, RingConGen.Rel r w x → RingConGen.Rel r y z →
RingConGen.Rel r (w + y) (x + z)
| mul : ∀ {w x y z}, RingConGen.Rel r w x → RingConGen.Rel r y z →
RingConGen.Rel r (w * y) (x * z)
#align ring_con_gen.rel RingConGen.Rel
def ringConGen [Add R] [Mul R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := RingConGen.Rel r
iseqv := ⟨RingConGen.Rel.refl, @RingConGen.Rel.symm _ _ _ _, @RingConGen.Rel.trans _ _ _ _⟩
add' := RingConGen.Rel.add
mul' := RingConGen.Rel.mul
#align ring_con_gen ringConGen
namespace RingCon
section Data
section Lattice
variable [Add R] [Mul R]
instance : LE (RingCon R) where
le c d := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, c x y → d x y
theorem le_def {c d : RingCon R} : c ≤ d ↔ ∀ {x y}, c x y → d x y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (RingCon R) where
sInf S :=
{ r := fun x y => ∀ c : RingCon R, c ∈ S → c x y
iseqv :=
⟨fun x c _hc => c.refl x, fun h c hc => c.symm <| h c hc, fun h1 h2 c hc =>
c.trans (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc
mul' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc }
theorem sInf_toSetoid (S : Set (RingCon R)) : (sInf S).toSetoid = sInf ((·.toSetoid) '' S) :=
Setoid.ext' fun x y =>
⟨fun h r ⟨c, hS, hr⟩ => by rw [← hr]; exact h c hS, fun h c hS => h c.toSetoid ⟨c, hS, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (RingCon R)) : ⇑(sInf S) = sInf ((⇑) '' S) := by
ext; simp only [sInf_image, iInf_apply, iInf_Prop_eq]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Congruence.lean | 470 | 471 | theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → RingCon R) : ⇑(iInf f) = ⨅ i, ⇑(f i) := by |
rw [iInf, coe_sInf, ← Set.range_comp, sInf_range, Function.comp]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import analysis.normed.group.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
open Metric Set Pointwise Topology
variable {E : Type*}
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : Set E} {x y : E}
variable (ε δ s t x y)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_thickening : (thickening δ s)⁻¹ = thickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [thickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
#align inv_thickening inv_thickening
#align neg_thickening neg_thickening
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_cthickening : (cthickening δ s)⁻¹ = cthickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [cthickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
#align inv_cthickening inv_cthickening
#align neg_cthickening neg_cthickening
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ball : (ball x δ)⁻¹ = ball x⁻¹ δ := (IsometryEquiv.inv E).preimage_ball x δ
#align inv_ball inv_ball
#align neg_ball neg_ball
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_closedBall : (closedBall x δ)⁻¹ = closedBall x⁻¹ δ :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv E).preimage_closedBall x δ
#align inv_closed_ball inv_closedBall
#align neg_closed_ball neg_closedBall
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_ball : {x} * ball y δ = ball (x * y) δ := by
simp only [preimage_mul_ball, image_mul_left, singleton_mul, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm y x]
#align singleton_mul_ball singleton_mul_ball
#align singleton_add_ball singleton_add_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_ball : {x} / ball y δ = ball (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_ball, singleton_mul_ball]
#align singleton_div_ball singleton_div_ball
#align singleton_sub_ball singleton_sub_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_mul_singleton : ball x δ * {y} = ball (x * y) δ := by
rw [mul_comm, singleton_mul_ball, mul_comm y]
#align ball_mul_singleton ball_mul_singleton
#align ball_add_singleton ball_add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_div_singleton : ball x δ / {y} = ball (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_singleton, ball_mul_singleton]
#align ball_div_singleton ball_div_singleton
#align ball_sub_singleton ball_sub_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_ball_one : {x} * ball 1 δ = ball x δ := by simp
#align singleton_mul_ball_one singleton_mul_ball_one
#align singleton_add_ball_zero singleton_add_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_ball_one : {x} / ball 1 δ = ball x δ := by
rw [singleton_div_ball, div_one]
#align singleton_div_ball_one singleton_div_ball_one
#align singleton_sub_ball_zero singleton_sub_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_mul_singleton : ball 1 δ * {x} = ball x δ := by simp [ball_mul_singleton]
#align ball_one_mul_singleton ball_one_mul_singleton
#align ball_zero_add_singleton ball_zero_add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_div_singleton : ball 1 δ / {x} = ball x⁻¹ δ := by
rw [ball_div_singleton, one_div]
#align ball_one_div_singleton ball_one_div_singleton
#align ball_zero_sub_singleton ball_zero_sub_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ball_one : x • ball (1 : E) δ = ball x δ := by
rw [smul_ball, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align smul_ball_one smul_ball_one
#align vadd_ball_zero vadd_ball_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem singleton_mul_closedBall : {x} * closedBall y δ = closedBall (x * y) δ := by
simp_rw [singleton_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, image_smul, smul_closedBall]
#align singleton_mul_closed_ball singleton_mul_closedBall
#align singleton_add_closed_ball singleton_add_closedBall
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem singleton_div_closedBall : {x} / closedBall y δ = closedBall (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_closedBall, singleton_mul_closedBall]
#align singleton_div_closed_ball singleton_div_closedBall
#align singleton_sub_closed_ball singleton_sub_closedBall
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem closedBall_mul_singleton : closedBall x δ * {y} = closedBall (x * y) δ := by
simp [mul_comm _ {y}, mul_comm y]
#align closed_ball_mul_singleton closedBall_mul_singleton
#align closed_ball_add_singleton closedBall_add_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem closedBall_div_singleton : closedBall x δ / {y} = closedBall (x / y) δ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align closed_ball_div_singleton closedBall_div_singleton
#align closed_ball_sub_singleton closedBall_sub_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_closedBall_one : {x} * closedBall 1 δ = closedBall x δ := by simp
#align singleton_mul_closed_ball_one singleton_mul_closedBall_one
#align singleton_add_closed_ball_zero singleton_add_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_closedBall_one : {x} / closedBall 1 δ = closedBall x δ := by
rw [singleton_div_closedBall, div_one]
#align singleton_div_closed_ball_one singleton_div_closedBall_one
#align singleton_sub_closed_ball_zero singleton_sub_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem closedBall_one_mul_singleton : closedBall 1 δ * {x} = closedBall x δ := by simp
#align closed_ball_one_mul_singleton closedBall_one_mul_singleton
#align closed_ball_zero_add_singleton closedBall_zero_add_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem closedBall_one_div_singleton : closedBall 1 δ / {x} = closedBall x⁻¹ δ := by simp
#align closed_ball_one_div_singleton closedBall_one_div_singleton
#align closed_ball_zero_sub_singleton closedBall_zero_sub_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem smul_closedBall_one : x • closedBall (1 : E) δ = closedBall x δ := by simp
#align smul_closed_ball_one smul_closedBall_one
#align vadd_closed_ball_zero vadd_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ball_one : s * ball 1 δ = thickening δ s := by
rw [thickening_eq_biUnion_ball]
convert iUnion₂_mul (fun x (_ : x ∈ s) => {x}) (ball (1 : E) δ)
· exact s.biUnion_of_singleton.symm
ext x
simp_rw [singleton_mul_ball, mul_one]
#align mul_ball_one mul_ball_one
#align add_ball_zero add_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ball_one : s / ball 1 δ = thickening δ s := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_ball_one]
#align div_ball_one div_ball_one
#align sub_ball_zero sub_ball_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_mul_one : ball 1 δ * s = thickening δ s := by rw [mul_comm, mul_ball_one]
#align ball_mul_one ball_mul_one
#align ball_add_zero ball_add_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_div_one : ball 1 δ / s = thickening δ s⁻¹ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ball_mul_one]
#align ball_div_one ball_div_one
#align ball_sub_zero ball_sub_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_ball : s * ball x δ = x • thickening δ s := by
rw [← smul_ball_one, mul_smul_comm, mul_ball_one]
#align mul_ball mul_ball
#align add_ball add_ball
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_ball : s / ball x δ = x⁻¹ • thickening δ s := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_ball div_ball
#align sub_ball sub_ball
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ball_mul : ball x δ * s = x • thickening δ s := by rw [mul_comm, mul_ball]
#align ball_mul ball_mul
#align ball_add ball_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ball_div : ball x δ / s = x • thickening δ s⁻¹ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align ball_div ball_div
#align ball_sub ball_sub
variable {ε δ s t x y}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.mul_closedBall_one (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
s * closedBall (1 : E) δ = cthickening δ s := by
rw [hs.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall hδ]
ext x
simp only [mem_mul, dist_eq_norm_div, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, exists_and_left,
mem_closedBall_one_iff, ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq'', div_one, exists_eq_right]
#align is_compact.mul_closed_ball_one IsCompact.mul_closedBall_one
#align is_compact.add_closed_ball_zero IsCompact.add_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.div_closedBall_one (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
s / closedBall 1 δ = cthickening δ s := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, hs.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
#align is_compact.div_closed_ball_one IsCompact.div_closedBall_one
#align is_compact.sub_closed_ball_zero IsCompact.sub_closedBall_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.closedBall_one_mul (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
closedBall 1 δ * s = cthickening δ s := by rw [mul_comm, hs.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
#align is_compact.closed_ball_one_mul IsCompact.closedBall_one_mul
#align is_compact.closed_ball_zero_add IsCompact.closedBall_zero_add
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Pointwise.lean | 291 | 293 | theorem IsCompact.closedBall_one_div (hs : IsCompact s) (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
closedBall 1 δ / s = cthickening δ s⁻¹ := by |
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, hs.inv.mul_closedBall_one hδ]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightLim
#align_import measure_theory.measure.stieltjes from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"20d5763051978e9bc6428578ed070445df6a18b3"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set Filter Function ENNReal NNReal Topology MeasureTheory
open ENNReal (ofReal)
structure StieltjesFunction where
toFun : ℝ → ℝ
mono' : Monotone toFun
right_continuous' : ∀ x, ContinuousWithinAt toFun (Ici x) x
#align stieltjes_function StieltjesFunction
#align stieltjes_function.to_fun StieltjesFunction.toFun
#align stieltjes_function.mono' StieltjesFunction.mono'
#align stieltjes_function.right_continuous' StieltjesFunction.right_continuous'
namespace StieltjesFunction
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun StieltjesFunction fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
#align stieltjes_function.has_coe_to_fun StieltjesFunction.instCoeFun
initialize_simps_projections StieltjesFunction (toFun → apply)
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : StieltjesFunction} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := by
exact (StieltjesFunction.mk.injEq ..).mpr (funext (by exact h))
variable (f : StieltjesFunction)
theorem mono : Monotone f :=
f.mono'
#align stieltjes_function.mono StieltjesFunction.mono
theorem right_continuous (x : ℝ) : ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici x) x :=
f.right_continuous' x
#align stieltjes_function.right_continuous StieltjesFunction.right_continuous
theorem rightLim_eq (f : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) : Function.rightLim f x = f x := by
rw [← f.mono.continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_rightLim_eq, continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici]
exact f.right_continuous' x
#align stieltjes_function.right_lim_eq StieltjesFunction.rightLim_eq
theorem iInf_Ioi_eq (f : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) : ⨅ r : Ioi x, f r = f x := by
suffices Function.rightLim f x = ⨅ r : Ioi x, f r by rw [← this, f.rightLim_eq]
rw [f.mono.rightLim_eq_sInf, sInf_image']
rw [← neBot_iff]
infer_instance
#align stieltjes_function.infi_Ioi_eq StieltjesFunction.iInf_Ioi_eq
theorem iInf_rat_gt_eq (f : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) :
⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, f r = f x := by
rw [← iInf_Ioi_eq f x]
refine (Real.iInf_Ioi_eq_iInf_rat_gt _ ?_ f.mono).symm
refine ⟨f x, fun y => ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, hy_mem, rfl⟩
exact f.mono (le_of_lt hy_mem)
#align stieltjes_function.infi_rat_gt_eq StieltjesFunction.iInf_rat_gt_eq
@[simps]
protected def id : StieltjesFunction where
toFun := id
mono' _ _ := id
right_continuous' _ := continuousWithinAt_id
#align stieltjes_function.id StieltjesFunction.id
#align stieltjes_function.id_apply StieltjesFunction.id_apply
@[simp]
theorem id_leftLim (x : ℝ) : leftLim StieltjesFunction.id x = x :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (StieltjesFunction.id.mono.tendsto_leftLim x) <|
continuousAt_id.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align stieltjes_function.id_left_lim StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim
instance instInhabited : Inhabited StieltjesFunction :=
⟨StieltjesFunction.id⟩
#align stieltjes_function.inhabited StieltjesFunction.instInhabited
noncomputable def _root_.Monotone.stieltjesFunction {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Monotone f) :
StieltjesFunction where
toFun := rightLim f
mono' x y hxy := hf.rightLim hxy
right_continuous' := by
intro x s hs
obtain ⟨l, u, hlu, lus⟩ : ∃ l u : ℝ, rightLim f x ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.1 hs
obtain ⟨y, xy, h'y⟩ : ∃ (y : ℝ), x < y ∧ Ioc x y ⊆ f ⁻¹' Ioo l u :=
mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset.1 (hf.tendsto_rightLim x (Ioo_mem_nhds hlu.1 hlu.2))
change ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≥] x, rightLim f y ∈ s
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici ⟨le_refl x, xy⟩] with z hz
apply lus
refine ⟨hlu.1.trans_le (hf.rightLim hz.1), ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, za, ay⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ, z < a ∧ a < y := exists_between hz.2
calc
rightLim f z ≤ f a := hf.rightLim_le za
_ < u := (h'y ⟨hz.1.trans_lt za, ay.le⟩).2
#align monotone.stieltjes_function Monotone.stieltjesFunction
theorem _root_.Monotone.stieltjesFunction_eq {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Monotone f) (x : ℝ) :
hf.stieltjesFunction x = rightLim f x :=
rfl
#align monotone.stieltjes_function_eq Monotone.stieltjesFunction_eq
theorem countable_leftLim_ne (f : StieltjesFunction) : Set.Countable { x | leftLim f x ≠ f x } := by
refine Countable.mono ?_ f.mono.countable_not_continuousAt
intro x hx h'x
apply hx
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (f.mono.tendsto_leftLim x) (h'x.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
#align stieltjes_function.countable_left_lim_ne StieltjesFunction.countable_leftLim_ne
def length (s : Set ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (a) (b) (_ : s ⊆ Ioc a b), ofReal (f b - f a)
#align stieltjes_function.length StieltjesFunction.length
@[simp]
theorem length_empty : f.length ∅ = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| iInf_le_of_le 0 <| iInf_le_of_le 0 <| by simp
#align stieltjes_function.length_empty StieltjesFunction.length_empty
@[simp]
theorem length_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : f.length (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a) := by
refine
le_antisymm (iInf_le_of_le a <| iInf₂_le b Subset.rfl)
(le_iInf fun a' => le_iInf fun b' => le_iInf fun h => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 ?_)
rcases le_or_lt b a with ab | ab
· rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 (f.mono ab))]
apply zero_le
cases' (Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff ab).1 h with h₁ h₂
exact Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal (sub_le_sub (f.mono h₁) (f.mono h₂))
#align stieltjes_function.length_Ioc StieltjesFunction.length_Ioc
theorem length_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set ℝ} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : f.length s₁ ≤ f.length s₂ :=
iInf_mono fun _ => biInf_mono fun _ => h.trans
#align stieltjes_function.length_mono StieltjesFunction.length_mono
open MeasureTheory
protected def outer : OuterMeasure ℝ :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction f.length f.length_empty
#align stieltjes_function.outer StieltjesFunction.outer
theorem outer_le_length (s : Set ℝ) : f.outer s ≤ f.length s :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction_le _
#align stieltjes_function.outer_le_length StieltjesFunction.outer_le_length
theorem length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo {a b : ℝ} {c d : ℕ → ℝ} (ss : Icc a b ⊆ ⋃ i, Ioo (c i) (d i)) :
ofReal (f b - f a) ≤ ∑' i, ofReal (f (d i) - f (c i)) := by
suffices
∀ (s : Finset ℕ) (b), Icc a b ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (s : Set ℕ), Ioo (c i) (d i)) →
(ofReal (f b - f a) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ofReal (f (d i) - f (c i)) by
rcases isCompact_Icc.elim_finite_subcover_image
(fun (i : ℕ) (_ : i ∈ univ) => @isOpen_Ioo _ _ _ _ (c i) (d i)) (by simpa using ss) with
⟨s, _, hf, hs⟩
have e : ⋃ i ∈ (hf.toFinset : Set ℕ), Ioo (c i) (d i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, Ioo (c i) (d i) := by
simp only [ext_iff, exists_prop, Finset.set_biUnion_coe, mem_iUnion, forall_const,
iff_self_iff, Finite.mem_toFinset]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ hf.toFinset)
exact this hf.toFinset _ (by simpa only [e] )
clear ss b
refine fun s => Finset.strongInductionOn s fun s IH b cv => ?_
rcases le_total b a with ab | ab
· rw [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (sub_nonpos.2 (f.mono ab))]
exact zero_le _
have := cv ⟨ab, le_rfl⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, gt_iff_lt, not_lt, ge_iff_le, mem_iUnion, mem_Ioo, exists_and_left,
exists_prop] at this
rcases this with ⟨i, cb, is, bd⟩
rw [← Finset.insert_erase is] at cv ⊢
rw [Finset.coe_insert, biUnion_insert] at cv
rw [Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _)]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (IH _ (Finset.erase_ssubset is) (c i) ?_) _)
· refine le_trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_) ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
exact sub_le_sub_right (f.mono bd.le) _
· rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact (cv ⟨h₁, le_trans h₂ (le_of_lt cb)⟩).resolve_left (mt And.left (not_lt_of_le h₂))
#align stieltjes_function.length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo StieltjesFunction.length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem outer_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : f.outer (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a) := by
refine
le_antisymm
(by
rw [← f.length_Ioc]
apply outer_le_length)
(le_iInf₂ fun s hs => ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_)
let δ := ε / 2
have δpos : 0 < (δ : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [δ] using εpos.ne'
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable δpos.ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', ε'0, hε⟩
obtain ⟨a', ha', aa'⟩ : ∃ a', f a' - f a < δ ∧ a < a' := by
have A : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => f r - f a) (Ioi a) a := by
refine ContinuousWithinAt.sub ?_ continuousWithinAt_const
exact (f.right_continuous a).mono Ioi_subset_Ici_self
have B : f a - f a < δ := by rwa [sub_self, NNReal.coe_pos, ← ENNReal.coe_pos]
exact (((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ B).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have : ∀ i, ∃ p : ℝ × ℝ, s i ⊆ Ioo p.1 p.2 ∧
(ofReal (f p.2 - f p.1) : ℝ≥0∞) < f.length (s i) + ε' i := by
intro i
have hl :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right ((ENNReal.le_tsum i).trans_lt h).ne (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 (ε'0 i).ne')
conv at hl =>
lhs
rw [length]
simp only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨p, q', spq, hq'⟩
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => ofReal (f r - f p)) (Ioi q') q' := by
apply ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
refine ContinuousWithinAt.sub ?_ continuousWithinAt_const
exact (f.right_continuous q').mono Ioi_subset_Ici_self
rcases (((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ hq').and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨q, hq, q'q⟩
exact ⟨⟨p, q⟩, spq.trans (Ioc_subset_Ioo_right q'q), hq⟩
choose g hg using this
have I_subset : Icc a' b ⊆ ⋃ i, Ioo (g i).1 (g i).2 :=
calc
Icc a' b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun x hx => ⟨aa'.trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
_ ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := hs
_ ⊆ ⋃ i, Ioo (g i).1 (g i).2 := iUnion_mono fun i => (hg i).1
calc
ofReal (f b - f a) = ofReal (f b - f a' + (f a' - f a)) := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ ofReal (f b - f a') + ofReal (f a' - f a) := ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
_ ≤ ∑' i, ofReal (f (g i).2 - f (g i).1) + ofReal δ :=
(add_le_add (f.length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo I_subset) (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ha'.le))
_ ≤ ∑' i, (f.length (s i) + ε' i) + δ :=
(add_le_add (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => (hg i).2.le)
(by simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, le_rfl]))
_ = ∑' i, f.length (s i) + ∑' i, (ε' i : ℝ≥0∞) + δ := by rw [ENNReal.tsum_add]
_ ≤ ∑' i, f.length (s i) + δ + δ := add_le_add (add_le_add le_rfl hε.le) le_rfl
_ = ∑' i : ℕ, f.length (s i) + ε := by simp [δ, add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
#align stieltjes_function.outer_Ioc StieltjesFunction.outer_Ioc
theorem measurableSet_Ioi {c : ℝ} : MeasurableSet[f.outer.caratheodory] (Ioi c) := by
refine OuterMeasure.ofFunction_caratheodory fun t => ?_
refine le_iInf fun a => le_iInf fun b => le_iInf fun h => ?_
refine
le_trans
(add_le_add (f.length_mono <| inter_subset_inter_left _ h)
(f.length_mono <| diff_subset_diff_left h)) ?_
rcases le_total a c with hac | hac <;> rcases le_total b c with hbc | hbc
· simp only [Ioc_inter_Ioi, f.length_Ioc, hac, _root_.sup_eq_max, hbc, le_refl, Ioc_eq_empty,
max_eq_right, min_eq_left, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_empty, zero_add, not_lt]
· simp only [hac, hbc, Ioc_inter_Ioi, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_Ioc, min_eq_right,
_root_.sup_eq_max, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, f.mono hac, f.mono hbc, sub_nonneg,
sub_add_sub_cancel, le_refl,
max_eq_right]
· simp only [hbc, le_refl, Ioc_eq_empty, Ioc_inter_Ioi, min_eq_left, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_empty,
zero_add, or_true_iff, le_sup_iff, f.length_Ioc, not_lt]
· simp only [hac, hbc, Ioc_inter_Ioi, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_Ioc, min_eq_right, _root_.sup_eq_max,
le_refl, Ioc_eq_empty, add_zero, max_eq_left, f.length_empty, not_lt]
#align stieltjes_function.measurable_set_Ioi StieltjesFunction.measurableSet_Ioi
theorem outer_trim : f.outer.trim = f.outer := by
refine le_antisymm (fun s => ?_) (OuterMeasure.le_trim _)
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf]
refine le_iInf fun t => le_iInf fun ht => ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε ε0 h => ?_
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', ε'0, hε⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt hε) _)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_add]
choose g hg using
show ∀ i, ∃ s, t i ⊆ s ∧ MeasurableSet s ∧ f.outer s ≤ f.length (t i) + ofReal (ε' i) by
intro i
have hl :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right ((ENNReal.le_tsum i).trans_lt h).ne (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 (ε'0 i)).ne'
conv at hl =>
lhs
rw [length]
simp only [iInf_lt_iff] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩
rw [← f.outer_Ioc] at h₂
exact ⟨_, h₁, measurableSet_Ioc, le_of_lt <| by simpa using h₂⟩
simp only [ofReal_coe_nnreal] at hg
apply iInf_le_of_le (iUnion g) _
apply iInf_le_of_le (ht.trans <| iUnion_mono fun i => (hg i).1) _
apply iInf_le_of_le (MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => (hg i).2.1) _
exact le_trans (measure_iUnion_le _) (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => (hg i).2.2)
#align stieltjes_function.outer_trim StieltjesFunction.outer_trim
theorem borel_le_measurable : borel ℝ ≤ f.outer.caratheodory := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [f.measurableSet_Ioi]
#align stieltjes_function.borel_le_measurable StieltjesFunction.borel_le_measurable
protected irreducible_def measure : Measure ℝ where
toOuterMeasure := f.outer
m_iUnion _s hs := f.outer.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory fun i => f.borel_le_measurable _ (hs i)
trim_le := f.outer_trim.le
#align stieltjes_function.measure StieltjesFunction.measure
@[simp]
theorem measure_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : f.measure (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a) := by
rw [StieltjesFunction.measure]
exact f.outer_Ioc a b
#align stieltjes_function.measure_Ioc StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioc
#adaptation_note
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Stieltjes.lean | 360 | 383 | theorem measure_singleton (a : ℝ) : f.measure {a} = ofReal (f a - leftLim f a) := by |
obtain ⟨u, u_mono, u_lt_a, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ, StrictMono u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, u n < a) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) :=
exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto a
have A : {a} = ⋂ n, Ioc (u n) a := by
refine Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hx, u_lt_a]) fun x hx => ?_
simp? at hx says simp only [mem_iInter, mem_Ioc] at hx
have : a ≤ x := le_of_tendsto' u_lim fun n => (hx n).1.le
simp [le_antisymm this (hx 0).2]
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => f.measure (Ioc (u n) a)) atTop (𝓝 (f.measure {a})) := by
rw [A]
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => measurableSet_Ioc) (fun m n hmn => ?_) ?_
· exact Ioc_subset_Ioc (u_mono.monotone hmn) le_rfl
· exact ⟨0, by simpa only [measure_Ioc] using ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top⟩
have L2 :
Tendsto (fun n => f.measure (Ioc (u n) a)) atTop (𝓝 (ofReal (f a - leftLim f a))) := by
simp only [measure_Ioc]
have : Tendsto (fun n => f (u n)) atTop (𝓝 (leftLim f a)) := by
apply (f.mono.tendsto_leftLim a).comp
exact
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ u_lim
(eventually_of_forall fun n => u_lt_a n)
exact ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.tendsto.comp (tendsto_const_nhds.sub this)
exact tendsto_nhds_unique L1 L2
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.lucas_lehmer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10b4e499f43088dd3bb7b5796184ad5216648ab1"
def mersenne (p : ℕ) : ℕ :=
2 ^ p - 1
#align mersenne mersenne
theorem strictMono_mersenne : StrictMono mersenne := fun m n h ↦
(Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right <| Nat.one_le_pow _ _ two_pos).2 <| by gcongr; norm_num1
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_lt_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p < mersenne q ↔ p < q :=
strictMono_mersenne.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_lt_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_lt_mersenne
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_le_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p ≤ mersenne q ↔ p ≤ q :=
strictMono_mersenne.le_iff_le
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_le_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_le_mersenne
@[simp] theorem mersenne_zero : mersenne 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mersenne_pos {p : ℕ} : 0 < mersenne p ↔ 0 < p := mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 0)
#align mersenne_pos mersenne_pos
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_mersenne {p : ℕ} : 1 < mersenne p ↔ 1 < p :=
mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 1)
@[simp]
theorem succ_mersenne (k : ℕ) : mersenne k + 1 = 2 ^ k := by
rw [mersenne, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact one_le_pow_of_one_le (by norm_num) k
#align succ_mersenne succ_mersenne
namespace LucasLehmer
open Nat
def s : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => s i ^ 2 - 2
#align lucas_lehmer.s LucasLehmer.s
def sZMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => sZMod p i ^ 2 - 2
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod LucasLehmer.sZMod
def sMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4 % (2 ^ p - 1)
| i + 1 => (sMod p i ^ 2 - 2) % (2 ^ p - 1)
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod LucasLehmer.sMod
theorem mersenne_int_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) : (0 : ℤ) < 2 ^ p - 1 :=
sub_pos.2 <| mod_cast Nat.one_lt_two_pow hp
theorem mersenne_int_ne_zero (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) ≠ 0 :=
(mersenne_int_pos hp).ne'
#align lucas_lehmer.mersenne_int_ne_zero LucasLehmer.mersenne_int_ne_zero
theorem sMod_nonneg (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : 0 ≤ sMod p i := by
cases i <;> dsimp [sMod]
· exact sup_eq_right.mp rfl
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
exact mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_nonneg LucasLehmer.sMod_nonneg
theorem sMod_mod (p i : ℕ) : sMod p i % (2 ^ p - 1) = sMod p i := by cases i <;> simp [sMod]
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_mod LucasLehmer.sMod_mod
theorem sMod_lt (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : sMod p i < 2 ^ p - 1 := by
rw [← sMod_mod]
refine (Int.emod_lt _ (mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp)).trans_eq ?_
exact abs_of_nonneg (mersenne_int_pos hp).le
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_lt LucasLehmer.sMod_lt
theorem sZMod_eq_s (p' : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod (p' + 2) i = (s i : ZMod (2 ^ (p' + 2) - 1)) := by
induction' i with i ih
· dsimp [s, sZMod]
norm_num
· push_cast [s, sZMod, ih]; rfl
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod_eq_s LucasLehmer.sZMod_eq_s
-- These next two don't make good `norm_cast` lemmas.
theorem Int.natCast_pow_pred (b p : ℕ) (w : 0 < b) : ((b ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (b : ℤ) ^ p - 1 := by
have : 1 ≤ b ^ p := Nat.one_le_pow p b w
norm_cast
#align lucas_lehmer.int.coe_nat_pow_pred LucasLehmer.Int.natCast_pow_pred
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias Int.coe_nat_pow_pred := Int.natCast_pow_pred
theorem Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred (p : ℕ) : ((2 ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) :=
Int.natCast_pow_pred 2 p (by decide)
#align lucas_lehmer.int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred LucasLehmer.Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LucasLehmer.lean | 173 | 174 | theorem sZMod_eq_sMod (p : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod p i = (sMod p i : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)) := by |
induction i <;> push_cast [← Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred p, sMod, sZMod, *] <;> rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import algebra.field.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2651125b48fc5c170ab1111afd0817c903b1fc6c"
universe u
section IsField
structure IsField (R : Type u) [Semiring R] : Prop where
exists_pair_ne : ∃ x y : R, x ≠ y
mul_comm : ∀ x y : R, x * y = y * x
mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {a : R}, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b, a * b = 1
#align is_field IsField
theorem Semifield.toIsField (R : Type u) [Semifield R] : IsField R where
__ := ‹Semifield R›
mul_inv_cancel {a} ha := ⟨a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel ha⟩
#align semifield.to_is_field Semifield.toIsField
theorem Field.toIsField (R : Type u) [Field R] : IsField R :=
Semifield.toIsField _
#align field.to_is_field Field.toIsField
@[simp]
theorem IsField.nontrivial {R : Type u} [Semiring R] (h : IsField R) : Nontrivial R :=
⟨h.exists_pair_ne⟩
#align is_field.nontrivial IsField.nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_isField_of_subsingleton (R : Type u) [Semiring R] [Subsingleton R] : ¬IsField R :=
fun h =>
let ⟨_, _, h⟩ := h.exists_pair_ne
h (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align not_is_field_of_subsingleton not_isField_of_subsingleton
open scoped Classical
noncomputable def IsField.toSemifield {R : Type u} [Semiring R] (h : IsField R) : Semifield R where
__ := ‹Semiring R›
__ := h
inv a := if ha : a = 0 then 0 else Classical.choose (h.mul_inv_cancel ha)
inv_zero := dif_pos rfl
mul_inv_cancel a ha := by convert Classical.choose_spec (h.mul_inv_cancel ha); exact dif_neg ha
nnqsmul := _
#align is_field.to_semifield IsField.toSemifield
noncomputable def IsField.toField {R : Type u} [Ring R] (h : IsField R) : Field R :=
{ ‹Ring R›, IsField.toSemifield h with qsmul := _ }
#align is_field.to_field IsField.toField
| Mathlib/Algebra/Field/IsField.lean | 84 | 93 | theorem uniq_inv_of_isField (R : Type u) [Ring R] (hf : IsField R) :
∀ x : R, x ≠ 0 → ∃! y : R, x * y = 1 := by |
intro x hx
apply exists_unique_of_exists_of_unique
· exact hf.mul_inv_cancel hx
· intro y z hxy hxz
calc
y = y * (x * z) := by rw [hxz, mul_one]
_ = x * y * z := by rw [← mul_assoc, hf.mul_comm y x]
_ = z := by rw [hxy, one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpOrder
#align_import measure_theory.function.l1_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ccdbfb6e5614667af5aa3ab2d50885e0ef44a46f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} [MeasurableSpace δ]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup β]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup γ]
namespace MeasureTheory
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by simp only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by
simp only [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_edist_triangle {f g h : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hh : AEStronglyMeasurable h μ) :
(∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (h a) ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, edist (g a) (h a) ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_left' (hf.edist hh)]
refine lintegral_mono fun a => ?_
apply edist_triangle_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_edist_triangle MeasureTheory.lintegral_edist_triangle
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_zero : (∫⁻ _ : α, ‖(0 : β)‖₊ ∂μ) = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_left {f : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (g : α → γ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_left' hf.ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_right (f : α → β) {g : α → γ} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' _ hg.ennnorm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_neg {f : α → β} : (∫⁻ a, ‖(-f) a‖₊ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, nnnorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg
def HasFiniteIntegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
(∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ ((∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_norm MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, edist_dist, dist_zero_right]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_edist MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) < ∞ := by
rw [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg h]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_real MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : HasFiniteIntegral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ ‖g a‖) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm] at *
calc
(∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal ‖g a‖ ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun a h => ofReal_le_ofReal h)
_ < ∞ := hg
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : HasFiniteIntegral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hg.mono <| h.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono' MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono'
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hf.mono <| EventuallyEq.le <| EventuallyEq.symm h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.congr' MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.congr'
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_congr' MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_congr'
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hf.congr' <| h.fun_comp norm
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.congr MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.congr
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_congr' <| h.fun_comp norm
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_congr MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_congr
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff {c : β} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ := by
simp [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_const, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ENNReal.mul_eq_top,
or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_const_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : β) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => c) μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff.2 (Or.inr <| measure_lt_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_const MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_const
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {C : ℝ}
(hC : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ C) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
(hasFiniteIntegral_const C).mono' hC
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_of_bounded MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.of_finite [Finite α] [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype α
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded <| ae_of_all μ <| norm_le_pi_norm f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias hasFiniteIntegral_of_fintype := HasFiniteIntegral.of_finite
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono' hμ le_rfl) h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : HasFiniteIntegral f μ)
(hν : HasFiniteIntegral f ν) : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_add_measure] at *
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨hμ, hν⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_right <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.left_of_add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ν :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_left <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.right_of_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_add_measure {f : α → β} :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν) ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ ∧ HasFiniteIntegral f ν :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(hc : c ≠ ∞) : HasFiniteIntegral f (c • μ) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_smul_measure] at *
exact mul_lt_top hc h.ne
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.smul_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.smul_measure
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (0 : Measure α) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_zero_measure, zero_lt_top]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure
variable (α β μ)
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_zero : HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => (0 : β)) μ := by
simp [HasFiniteIntegral]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_zero MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_zero
variable {α β μ}
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.neg {f : α → β} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (-f) μ := by simpa [HasFiniteIntegral] using hfi
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.neg MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.neg
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_neg_iff {f : α → β} : HasFiniteIntegral (-f) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, HasFiniteIntegral.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_neg_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_neg_iff
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.norm {f : α → β} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ := by
have eq : (fun a => (nnnorm ‖f a‖ : ℝ≥0∞)) = fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
funext
rw [nnnorm_norm]
rwa [HasFiniteIntegral, eq]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.norm MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_congr' <| eventually_of_forall fun x => norm_norm (f x)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_norm_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x).toReal) μ := by
have :
∀ x, (‖(f x).toReal‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨(f x).toReal, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg⟩ := by
intro x
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg]
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, this]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono fun x => ?_) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hf)
by_cases hfx : f x = ∞
· simp [hfx]
· lift f x to ℝ≥0 using hfx with fx h
simp [← h, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) := by
refine isFiniteMeasure_withDensity ((lintegral_mono fun x => ?_).trans_lt hfi).ne
exact Real.ofReal_le_ennnorm (f x)
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_withDensity_ofReal
-- variable [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace δ]
def Integrable {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ ∧ HasFiniteIntegral f μ
#align measure_theory.integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable
theorem memℒp_one_iff_integrable {f : α → β} : Memℒp f 1 μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [Integrable, HasFiniteIntegral, Memℒp, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable MeasureTheory.memℒp_one_iff_integrable
theorem Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem Integrable.aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.aemeasurable
theorem Integrable.hasFiniteIntegral {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hf.2
#align measure_theory.integrable.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.Integrable.hasFiniteIntegral
theorem Integrable.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ ‖g a‖) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.hasFiniteIntegral.mono h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono
theorem Integrable.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.hasFiniteIntegral.mono' h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono' MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono'
theorem Integrable.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : Integrable g μ :=
⟨hg, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.congr' h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.congr' MeasureTheory.Integrable.congr'
theorem integrable_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) :
Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h2f => h2f.congr' hg h, fun h2g => h2g.congr' hf <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_congr' MeasureTheory.integrable_congr'
theorem Integrable.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Integrable g μ :=
⟨hf.1.congr h, hf.2.congr h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.congr MeasureTheory.Integrable.congr
theorem integrable_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr h, fun hg => hg.congr h.symm⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_congr MeasureTheory.integrable_congr
theorem integrable_const_iff {c : β} : Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ := by
have : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun _ : α => c) μ := aestronglyMeasurable_const
rw [Integrable, and_iff_right this, hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff]
#align measure_theory.integrable_const_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem integrable_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : β) : Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ :=
integrable_const_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| measure_lt_top _ _
#align measure_theory.integrable_const MeasureTheory.integrable_const
@[simp]
theorem Integrable.of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
(μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → β) : Integrable (fun a ↦ f a) μ :=
⟨(StronglyMeasurable.of_finite f).aestronglyMeasurable, .of_finite⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")] alias integrable_of_fintype := Integrable.of_finite
theorem Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow
theorem Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Integrable (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) μ := by
by_cases h_zero : p = 0
· simp [h_zero, integrable_const]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, integrable_const]
exact hf.integrable_norm_rpow h_zero h_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow'
theorem Integrable.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨h.aestronglyMeasurable.mono_measure hμ, h.hasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure hμ⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono_measure
theorem Integrable.of_measure_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ)
{f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable f μ' := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.of_measure_le_smul c hc hμ'_le
#align measure_theory.integrable.of_measure_le_smul MeasureTheory.Integrable.of_measure_le_smul
theorem Integrable.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
Integrable f (μ + ν) := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hμ hν ⊢
refine ⟨hμ.aestronglyMeasurable.add_measure hν.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [snorm_one_add_measure, ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨hμ.snorm_lt_top, hν.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.add_measure
theorem Integrable.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f (μ + ν)) : Integrable f μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.left_of_add_measure
#align measure_theory.integrable.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.left_of_add_measure
theorem Integrable.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
Integrable f ν := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.right_of_add_measure
#align measure_theory.integrable.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.right_of_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integrable_add_measure {f : α → β} :
Integrable f (μ + ν) ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable f ν :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_add_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integrable_zero_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → β} :
Integrable f (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero_measure f, hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure f⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_zero_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_zero_measure
theorem integrable_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → β} {μ : ι → Measure α}
{s : Finset ι} : Integrable f (∑ i ∈ s, μ i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable f (μ i) := by
induction s using Finset.induction_on <;> simp [*]
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum_measure
theorem Integrable.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c • μ) := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.smul_measure hc
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_measure
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L1Space.lean | 572 | 575 | theorem Integrable.smul_measure_nnreal {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0} :
Integrable f (c • μ) := by |
apply h.smul_measure
simp
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.WittPolynomial
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.structure_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open MvPolynomial Set
open Finset (range)
open Finsupp (single)
-- This lemma reduces a bundled morphism to a "mere" function,
-- and consequently the simplifier cannot use a lot of powerful simp-lemmas.
-- We disable this locally, and probably it should be disabled globally in mathlib.
attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂Hom
variable {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} {idx : Type*} [CommRing R]
open scoped Witt
section PPrime
variable (p) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
noncomputable def wittStructureRat (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ :=
bind₁ (fun k => bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)
#align witt_structure_rat wittStructureRat
theorem wittStructureRat_prop (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (wittStructureRat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ :=
calc
bind₁ (wittStructureRat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) =
bind₁ (fun k => bind₁ (fun i => (rename (Prod.mk i)) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ)
(bind₁ (xInTermsOfW p ℚ) (W_ ℚ n)) := by
rw [bind₁_bind₁]; exact eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_rat _ _) rfl rfl
_ = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ := by
rw [bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial p _ n, bind₁_X_right]
#align witt_structure_rat_prop wittStructureRat_prop
theorem wittStructureRat_existsUnique (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) :
∃! φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ,
∀ n : ℕ, bind₁ φ (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ := by
refine ⟨wittStructureRat p Φ, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n; apply wittStructureRat_prop
· intro φ H
funext n
rw [show φ n = bind₁ φ (bind₁ (W_ ℚ) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) by
rw [bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW p, bind₁_X_right]]
rw [bind₁_bind₁]
exact eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_rat _ _) (funext H) rfl
#align witt_structure_rat_exists_unique wittStructureRat_existsUnique
theorem wittStructureRat_rec_aux (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
wittStructureRat p Φ n * C ((p : ℚ) ^ n) =
bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℚ) ^ i) * wittStructureRat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
have := xInTermsOfW_aux p ℚ n
replace := congr_arg (bind₁ fun k : ℕ => bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) this
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right] at this
rw [wittStructureRat, this]; clear this
conv_lhs => simp only [AlgHom.map_sub, bind₁_X_right]
rw [sub_right_inj]
simp only [AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right, AlgHom.map_pow]
rfl
#align witt_structure_rat_rec_aux wittStructureRat_rec_aux
theorem wittStructureRat_rec (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
wittStructureRat p Φ n =
C (1 / (p : ℚ) ^ n) *
(bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℚ) ^ i) * wittStructureRat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i)) := by
calc
wittStructureRat p Φ n = C (1 / (p : ℚ) ^ n) * (wittStructureRat p Φ n * C ((p : ℚ) ^ n)) := ?_
_ = _ := by rw [wittStructureRat_rec_aux]
rw [mul_left_comm, ← C_mul, div_mul_cancel₀, C_1, mul_one]
exact pow_ne_zero _ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hp.1.ne_zero)
#align witt_structure_rat_rec wittStructureRat_rec
noncomputable def wittStructureInt (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ :=
Finsupp.mapRange Rat.num (Rat.num_intCast 0) (wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) n)
#align witt_structure_int wittStructureInt
variable {p}
theorem bind₁_rename_expand_wittPolynomial (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ)
(IH :
∀ m : ℕ,
m < n + 1 →
map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (wittStructureInt p Φ m) =
wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) m) :
bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (expand p (W_ ℤ n))) Φ =
bind₁ (fun i => expand p (wittStructureInt p Φ i)) (W_ ℤ n) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [map_bind₁, map_rename, map_expand, rename_expand, map_wittPolynomial]
have key := (wittStructureRat_prop p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) n).symm
apply_fun expand p at key
simp only [expand_bind₁] at key
rw [key]; clear key
apply eval₂Hom_congr' rfl _ rfl
rintro i hi -
rw [wittPolynomial_vars, Finset.mem_range] at hi
simp only [IH i hi]
#align bind₁_rename_expand_witt_polynomial bind₁_rename_expand_wittPolynomial
theorem C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_wittPolynomial_sub_sum (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ)
(IH :
∀ m : ℕ,
m < n →
map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (wittStructureInt p Φ m) =
wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) m) :
(C ((p ^ n :) : ℤ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ) ∣
bind₁ (fun b : idx => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℤ) ^ i) * wittStructureInt p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
cases' n with n
· simp only [isUnit_one, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add, pow_zero, C_1, IsUnit.dvd,
Nat.cast_one, Nat.zero_eq]
-- prepare a useful equation for rewriting
have key := bind₁_rename_expand_wittPolynomial Φ n IH
apply_fun map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod (p ^ (n + 1)))) at key
conv_lhs at key => simp only [map_bind₁, map_rename, map_expand, map_wittPolynomial]
-- clean up and massage
rw [C_dvd_iff_zmod, RingHom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_bind₁]
simp only [map_rename, map_wittPolynomial, wittPolynomial_zmod_self]
rw [key]; clear key IH
rw [bind₁, aeval_wittPolynomial, map_sum, map_sum, Finset.sum_congr rfl]
intro k hk
rw [Finset.mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hk
-- Porting note (#11083): was much slower
-- simp only [← sub_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_sub, ← C_dvd_iff_zmod, C_eq_coe_nat, ← mul_sub, ←
-- Nat.cast_pow]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_sub, ← C_dvd_iff_zmod, C_eq_coe_nat, ← Nat.cast_pow,
← Nat.cast_pow, C_eq_coe_nat, ← mul_sub]
have : p ^ (n + 1) = p ^ k * p ^ (n - k + 1) := by
rw [← pow_add, ← add_assoc]; congr 2; rw [add_comm, ← tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hk]
rw [this]
rw [Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_pow]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left ((p : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ) ^ k)
rw [show p ^ (n + 1 - k) = p * p ^ (n - k) by rw [← pow_succ', ← tsub_add_eq_add_tsub hk]]
rw [pow_mul]
-- the machine!
apply dvd_sub_pow_of_dvd_sub
rw [← C_eq_coe_nat, C_dvd_iff_zmod, RingHom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_expand, RingHom.map_pow,
MvPolynomial.expand_zmod]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_witt_polynomial_sub_sum C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_wittPolynomial_sub_sum
variable (p)
@[simp]
theorem map_wittStructureInt (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) :
map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (wittStructureInt p Φ n) =
wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) n := by
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on with | h n IH => ?_
rw [wittStructureInt, map_mapRange_eq_iff, Int.coe_castRingHom]
intro c
rw [wittStructureRat_rec, coeff_C_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc', mul_one]
have sum_induction_steps :
map (Int.castRingHom ℚ)
(∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℤ) ^ i) * wittStructureInt p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i)) =
∑ i ∈ range n,
C ((p : ℚ) ^ i) * wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
rw [map_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
simp only [IH i hi, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_pow, map_C]
rfl
simp only [← sum_induction_steps, ← map_wittPolynomial p (Int.castRingHom ℚ), ← map_rename, ←
map_bind₁, ← RingHom.map_sub, coeff_map]
rw [show (p : ℚ) ^ n = ((↑(p ^ n) : ℤ) : ℚ) by norm_cast]
rw [← Rat.den_eq_one_iff, eq_intCast, Rat.den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff]
swap; · exact mod_cast pow_ne_zero n hp.1.ne_zero
revert c; rw [← C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff]
exact C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_wittPolynomial_sub_sum Φ n IH
#align map_witt_structure_int map_wittStructureInt
theorem wittStructureInt_prop (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n) :
bind₁ (wittStructureInt p Φ) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) =
bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℤ n)) Φ := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
have := wittStructureRat_prop p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) n
simpa only [map_bind₁, ← eval₂Hom_map_hom, eval₂Hom_C_left, map_rename, map_wittPolynomial,
AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, map_wittStructureInt]
#align witt_structure_int_prop wittStructureInt_prop
theorem eq_wittStructureInt (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ)
(h : ∀ n, bind₁ φ (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℤ n)) Φ) :
φ = wittStructureInt p Φ := by
funext k
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
rw [map_wittStructureInt]
-- Porting note: was `refine' congr_fun _ k`
revert k
refine congr_fun ?_
apply ExistsUnique.unique (wittStructureRat_existsUnique p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ))
· intro n
specialize h n
apply_fun map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) at h
simpa only [map_bind₁, ← eval₂Hom_map_hom, eval₂Hom_C_left, map_rename, map_wittPolynomial,
AlgHom.coe_toRingHom] using h
· intro n; apply wittStructureRat_prop
#align eq_witt_structure_int eq_wittStructureInt
theorem wittStructureInt_existsUnique (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) :
∃! φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ,
∀ n : ℕ,
bind₁ φ (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = bind₁ (fun i : idx => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℤ n)) Φ :=
⟨wittStructureInt p Φ, wittStructureInt_prop _ _, eq_wittStructureInt _ _⟩
#align witt_structure_int_exists_unique wittStructureInt_existsUnique
theorem witt_structure_prop (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n) :
aeval (fun i => map (Int.castRingHom R) (wittStructureInt p Φ i)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) =
aeval (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W n)) Φ := by
convert congr_arg (map (Int.castRingHom R)) (wittStructureInt_prop p Φ n) using 1 <;>
rw [hom_bind₁] <;>
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
· rfl
· simp only [map_rename, map_wittPolynomial]
#align witt_structure_prop witt_structure_prop
theorem wittStructureInt_rename {σ : Type*} (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (f : idx → σ) (n : ℕ) :
wittStructureInt p (rename f Φ) n = rename (Prod.map f id) (wittStructureInt p Φ n) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [map_rename, map_wittStructureInt, wittStructureRat, rename_bind₁, rename_rename,
bind₁_rename]
rfl
#align witt_structure_int_rename wittStructureInt_rename
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittStructureRat_zero (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) :
constantCoeff (wittStructureRat p Φ 0) = constantCoeff Φ := by
simp only [wittStructureRat, bind₁, map_aeval, xInTermsOfW_zero, constantCoeff_rename,
constantCoeff_wittPolynomial, aeval_X, constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap, eval₂Hom_zero'_apply,
RingHom.id_apply]
#align constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat_zero constantCoeff_wittStructureRat_zero
theorem constantCoeff_wittStructureRat (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (h : constantCoeff Φ = 0) (n : ℕ) :
constantCoeff (wittStructureRat p Φ n) = 0 := by
simp only [wittStructureRat, eval₂Hom_zero'_apply, h, bind₁, map_aeval, constantCoeff_rename,
constantCoeff_wittPolynomial, constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap, RingHom.id_apply,
constantCoeff_xInTermsOfW]
#align constant_coeff_witt_structure_rat constantCoeff_wittStructureRat
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittStructureInt_zero (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) :
constantCoeff (wittStructureInt p Φ 0) = constantCoeff Φ := by
have inj : Function.Injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) := by intro m n; exact Int.cast_inj.mp
apply inj
rw [← constantCoeff_map, map_wittStructureInt, constantCoeff_wittStructureRat_zero,
constantCoeff_map]
#align constant_coeff_witt_structure_int_zero constantCoeff_wittStructureInt_zero
theorem constantCoeff_wittStructureInt (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (h : constantCoeff Φ = 0) (n : ℕ) :
constantCoeff (wittStructureInt p Φ n) = 0 := by
have inj : Function.Injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) := by intro m n; exact Int.cast_inj.mp
apply inj
rw [← constantCoeff_map, map_wittStructureInt, constantCoeff_wittStructureRat, RingHom.map_zero]
rw [constantCoeff_map, h, RingHom.map_zero]
#align constant_coeff_witt_structure_int constantCoeff_wittStructureInt
variable (R)
-- we could relax the fintype on `idx`, but then we need to cast from finset to set.
-- for our applications `idx` is always finite.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean | 389 | 400 | theorem wittStructureRat_vars [Fintype idx] (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
(wittStructureRat p Φ n).vars ⊆ Finset.univ ×ˢ Finset.range (n + 1) := by |
rw [wittStructureRat]
intro x hx
simp only [Finset.mem_product, true_and_iff, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.mem_range]
obtain ⟨k, hk, hx'⟩ := mem_vars_bind₁ _ _ hx
obtain ⟨i, -, hx''⟩ := mem_vars_bind₁ _ _ hx'
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := mem_vars_rename _ _ hx''
rw [wittPolynomial_vars, Finset.mem_range] at hj
replace hk := xInTermsOfW_vars_subset p _ hk
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hk
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hj hk
|
import Mathlib.Data.TypeMax
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Images
#align_import category_theory.limits.types from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4aa2a2e17940311e47007f087c9df229e7f12942"
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace Types
variable {J : Type v} [Category.{w} J]
theorem hasLimit_iff_small_sections (F : J ⥤ Type u): HasLimit F ↔ Small.{u} F.sections :=
⟨fun _ => .mk ⟨_, ⟨(Equiv.ofBijective _
((isLimit_iff_bijective_sectionOfCone (limit.cone F)).mp ⟨limit.isLimit _⟩)).symm⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨_, Small.limitConeIsLimit F⟩⟩
-- TODO: If `UnivLE` works out well, we will eventually want to deprecate these
-- definitions, and probably as a first step put them in namespace or otherwise rename them.
def Quot.Rel (F : J ⥤ Type u) : (Σ j, F.obj j) → (Σ j, F.obj j) → Prop := fun p p' =>
∃ f : p.1 ⟶ p'.1, p'.2 = F.map f p.2
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def Quot (F : J ⥤ Type u) : Type (max v u) :=
_root_.Quot (Quot.Rel F)
instance [Small.{u} J] (F : J ⥤ Type u) : Small.{u} (Quot F) :=
small_of_surjective (surjective_quot_mk _)
def Quot.ι (F : J ⥤ Type u) (j : J) : F.obj j → Quot F :=
fun x => Quot.mk _ ⟨j, x⟩
lemma Quot.jointly_surjective {F : J ⥤ Type u} (x : Quot F) : ∃ j y, x = Quot.ι F j y :=
Quot.ind (β := fun x => ∃ j y, x = Quot.ι F j y) (fun ⟨j, y⟩ => ⟨j, y, rfl⟩) x
section
variable {F : J ⥤ Type u} (c : Cocone F)
def Quot.desc : Quot F → c.pt :=
Quot.lift (fun x => c.ι.app x.1 x.2) <| by
rintro ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨j', _⟩ ⟨φ : j ⟶ j', rfl : _ = F.map φ x⟩
exact congr_fun (c.ι.naturality φ).symm x
@[simp]
lemma Quot.ι_desc (j : J) (x : F.obj j) : Quot.desc c (Quot.ι F j x) = c.ι.app j x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Quot.map_ι {j j' : J} {f : j ⟶ j'} (x : F.obj j) : Quot.ι F j' (F.map f x) = Quot.ι F j x :=
(Quot.sound ⟨f, rfl⟩).symm
@[simps]
def toCocone {α : Type u} (f : Quot F → α) : Cocone F where
pt := α
ι := { app := fun j => f ∘ Quot.ι F j }
lemma Quot.desc_toCocone_desc {α : Type u} (f : Quot F → α) (hc : IsColimit c) (x : Quot F) :
hc.desc (toCocone f) (Quot.desc c x) = f x := by
obtain ⟨j, y, rfl⟩ := Quot.jointly_surjective x
simpa using congrFun (hc.fac _ j) y
theorem isColimit_iff_bijective_desc : Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ (Quot.desc c).Bijective := by
classical
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· refine fun ⟨hc⟩ => ⟨fun x y h => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· let f : Quot F → ULift.{u} Bool := fun z => ULift.up (x = z)
suffices f x = f y by simpa [f] using this
rw [← Quot.desc_toCocone_desc c f hc x, h, Quot.desc_toCocone_desc]
· let f₁ : c.pt ⟶ ULift.{u} Bool := fun _ => ULift.up true
let f₂ : c.pt ⟶ ULift.{u} Bool := fun x => ULift.up (∃ a, Quot.desc c a = x)
suffices f₁ = f₂ by simpa [f₁, f₂] using congrFun this x
refine hc.hom_ext fun j => funext fun x => ?_
simpa [f₁, f₂] using ⟨Quot.ι F j x, by simp⟩
· refine fun h => ⟨?_⟩
let e := Equiv.ofBijective _ h
have h : ∀ j x, e.symm (c.ι.app j x) = Quot.ι F j x :=
fun j x => e.injective (Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply _ _ _)
exact
{ desc := fun s => Quot.desc s ∘ e.symm
fac := fun s j => by
ext x
simp [h]
uniq := fun s m hm => by
ext x
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := e.surjective x
obtain ⟨j, x, rfl⟩ := Quot.jointly_surjective x
rw [← h, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
simpa [h] using congrFun (hm j) x }
end
@[simps]
noncomputable def colimitCocone (F : J ⥤ Type u) [Small.{u} (Quot F)] : Cocone F where
pt := Shrink (Quot F)
ι :=
{ app := fun j x => equivShrink.{u} _ (Quot.mk _ ⟨j, x⟩)
naturality := fun _ _ f => funext fun _ => congrArg _ (Quot.sound ⟨f, rfl⟩).symm }
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Types.lean | 442 | 445 | theorem Quot.desc_colimitCocone (F : J ⥤ Type u) [Small.{u} (Quot F)] :
Quot.desc (colimitCocone F) = equivShrink.{u} (Quot F) := by |
ext ⟨j, x⟩
rfl
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.SplitCoequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Basic
#align_import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.equalizers from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4698e35ca56a0d4fa53aa5639c3364e0a77f4eba"
noncomputable section
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
section Coequalizers
variable {X Y Z : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ h)
def isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv :
IsColimit (G.mapCocone (Cofork.ofπ h w)) ≃
IsColimit
(Cofork.ofπ (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
(IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv (diagramIsoParallelPair _) _).symm.trans <|
IsColimit.equivIsoColimit <|
Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
dsimp only [Cofork.π, Cofork.ofπ_ι_app]
dsimp; rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_map_cocone_cofork_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv
def isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit [PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G]
(l : IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ h w)) :
IsColimit
(Cofork.ofπ (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv G w (PreservesColimit.preserves l)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_cofork_map_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit
def isColimitOfIsColimitCoforkMap [ReflectsColimit (parallelPair f g) G]
(l :
IsColimit
(Cofork.ofπ (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g))) :
IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ h w) :=
ReflectsColimit.reflects ((isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv G w).symm l)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_of_is_colimit_cofork_map CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitOfIsColimitCoforkMap
variable (f g) [HasCoequalizer f g]
def isColimitOfHasCoequalizerOfPreservesColimit [PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G] :
IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ (G.map (coequalizer.π f g)) (by
simp only [← G.map_comp]; rw [coequalizer.condition]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit G _ (coequalizerIsCoequalizer f g)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_of_has_coequalizer_of_preserves_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitOfHasCoequalizerOfPreservesColimit
variable [HasCoequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g)]
def ofIsoComparison [i : IsIso (coequalizerComparison f g G)] :
PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G := by
apply preservesColimitOfPreservesColimitCocone (coequalizerIsCoequalizer f g)
apply (isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv _ _).symm _
refine
@IsColimit.ofPointIso _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (colimit.isColimit (parallelPair (G.map f) (G.map g))) ?_
apply i
#align category_theory.limits.of_iso_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.ofIsoComparison
variable [PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G]
def PreservesCoequalizer.iso : coequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g) ≅ G.obj (coequalizer f g) :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _)
(isColimitOfHasCoequalizerOfPreservesColimit G f g)
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_coequalizer.iso CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesCoequalizer.iso
@[simp]
theorem PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom :
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).hom = coequalizerComparison f g G :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_coequalizer.iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom
instance : IsIso (coequalizerComparison f g G) := by
rw [← PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom]
infer_instance
instance map_π_epi : Epi (G.map (coequalizer.π f g)) :=
⟨fun {W} h k => by
rw [← ι_comp_coequalizerComparison]
haveI : Epi (coequalizer.π (G.map f) (G.map g) ≫ coequalizerComparison f g G) := by
apply epi_comp
apply (cancel_epi _).1⟩
#align category_theory.limits.map_π_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.map_π_epi
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Equalizers.lean | 207 | 211 | theorem map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv :
G.map (coequalizer.π f g) ≫ (PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).inv =
coequalizer.π (G.map f) (G.map g) := by |
rw [← ι_comp_coequalizerComparison_assoc, ← PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom, Iso.hom_inv_id,
comp_id]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8ea5598db6caeddde6cb734aa179cc2408dbd345"
assert_not_exists Module
assert_not_exists Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_equivalent Ordinal.isEquivalent
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
#align ordinal Ordinal
instance hasWellFoundedOut (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.out.α :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
#align has_well_founded_out hasWellFoundedOut
instance linearOrderOut (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.out.α :=
IsWellOrder.linearOrder o.out.r
#align linear_order_out linearOrderOut
instance isWellOrder_out_lt (o : Ordinal) : IsWellOrder o.out.α (· < ·) :=
o.out.wo
#align is_well_order_out_lt isWellOrder_out_lt
namespace Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem card_univ : card univ.{u,v} = Cardinal.univ.{u,v} :=
rfl
#align ordinal.card_univ Ordinal.card_univ
@[simp]
theorem nat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : Cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (n : Ordinal) ≤ o := by
rw [← Cardinal.ord_le, Cardinal.ord_nat]
#align ordinal.nat_le_card Ordinal.nat_le_card
@[simp]
theorem one_le_card {o} : 1 ≤ card o ↔ 1 ≤ o := by
simpa using nat_le_card (n := 1)
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal)) ≤ card o ↔ (OfNat.ofNat n : Ordinal) ≤ o :=
nat_le_card
@[simp]
theorem nat_lt_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : Cardinal) < card o ↔ (n : Ordinal) < o := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, ← succ_le_iff, ← nat_succ, nat_le_card]
rfl
#align ordinal.nat_lt_card Ordinal.nat_lt_card
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_card {o} : 0 < card o ↔ 0 < o := by
simpa using nat_lt_card (n := 0)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_card {o} : 1 < card o ↔ 1 < o := by
simpa using nat_lt_card (n := 1)
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_card {o} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : Cardinal)) < card o ↔ (OfNat.ofNat n : Ordinal) < o :=
nat_lt_card
@[simp]
theorem card_lt_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o < n ↔ o < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le nat_le_card
#align ordinal.card_lt_nat Ordinal.card_lt_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem card_lt_ofNat {o} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card o < (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) ↔ o < OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_lt_nat
@[simp]
theorem card_le_nat {o} {n : ℕ} : card o ≤ n ↔ o ≤ n :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 nat_lt_card
#align ordinal.card_le_nat Ordinal.card_le_nat
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,607 | 1,608 | theorem card_le_one {o} : card o ≤ 1 ↔ o ≤ 1 := by |
simpa using card_le_nat (n := 1)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
#align_import data.finsupp.ne_locus from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
variable {α M N P : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DecidableEq N]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_left [AddLeftCancelMonoid N] (f g h : α →₀ N) :
(f + g).neLocus (f + h) = g.neLocus h :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_left _ _ _ _ add_right_injective
#align finsupp.ne_locus_add_left Finsupp.neLocus_add_left
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_right [AddRightCancelMonoid N] (f g h : α →₀ N) :
(f + h).neLocus (g + h) = f.neLocus g :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_right _ _ _ _ add_left_injective
#align finsupp.ne_locus_add_right Finsupp.neLocus_add_right
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup N] (f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ : α →₀ N)
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_neg_neg : neLocus (-f) (-g) = f.neLocus g :=
mapRange_neLocus_eq _ _ neg_zero neg_injective
#align finsupp.ne_locus_neg_neg Finsupp.neLocus_neg_neg
theorem neLocus_neg : neLocus (-f) g = f.neLocus (-g) := by rw [← neLocus_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align finsupp.ne_locus_neg Finsupp.neLocus_neg
theorem neLocus_eq_support_sub : f.neLocus g = (f - g).support := by
rw [← neLocus_add_right _ _ (-g), add_right_neg, neLocus_zero_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align finsupp.ne_locus_eq_support_sub Finsupp.neLocus_eq_support_sub
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/NeLocus.lean | 149 | 150 | theorem neLocus_sub_left : neLocus (f - g₁) (f - g₂) = neLocus g₁ g₂ := by |
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neLocus_add_left, neLocus_neg_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformGroup
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section TopologicalGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalGroup α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
-- `by simpa using` speeds up elaboration. Why?
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.inv (h : HasProd f a) : HasProd (fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) a⁻¹ := by
simpa only using h.map (MonoidHom.id α)⁻¹ continuous_inv
#align has_sum.neg HasSum.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.inv (hf : Multipliable f) : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹ :=
hf.hasProd.inv.multipliable
#align summable.neg Summable.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.of_inv (hf : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) : Multipliable f := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using hf.inv
#align summable.of_neg Summable.of_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_inv_iff : (Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨Multipliable.of_inv, Multipliable.inv⟩
#align summable_neg_iff summable_neg_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.div (hf : HasProd f a₁) (hg : HasProd g a₂) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b / g b) (a₁ / a₂) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align has_sum.sub HasSum.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).multipliable
#align summable.sub Summable.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.trans_div (hg : Multipliable g) (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f := by
simpa only [div_mul_cancel] using hfg.mul hg
#align summable.trans_sub Summable.trans_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_iff_of_multipliable_div (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.trans_div <| by simpa only [inv_div] using hfg.inv, fun hg ↦ hg.trans_div hfg⟩
#align summable_iff_of_summable_sub summable_iff_of_summable_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.update (hf : HasProd f a₁) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
HasProd (update f b a) (a / f b * a₁) := by
convert (hasProd_ite_eq b (a / f b)).mul hf with b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· rw [h, update_same]
simp [eq_self_iff_true, if_true, sub_add_cancel]
· simp only [h, update_noteq, if_false, Ne, one_mul, not_false_iff]
#align has_sum.update HasSum.update
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.update (hf : Multipliable f) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
Multipliable (update f b a) :=
(hf.hasProd.update b a).multipliable
#align summable.update Summable.update
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) a₂ ↔ HasProd f (a₁ * a₂) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ hf.mul_compl h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at hf ⊢
rw [Set.mulIndicator_compl]
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_comm] using h.div hf
#align has_sum.has_sum_compl_iff HasSum.hasSum_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_iff_compl {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd f a₂ ↔ HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) (a₂ / a₁) :=
Iff.symm <| hf.hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_div_cancel]
#align has_sum.has_sum_iff_compl HasSum.hasSum_iff_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f where
mp := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_compl_iff.1 ha).multipliable
mpr := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_iff_compl.1 ha).multipliable
#align summable.summable_compl_iff Summable.summable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd f (a * ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_comm]
#align finset.has_sum_compl_iff Finset.hasSum_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_iff_compl (s : Finset β) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) (a / ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_iff_compl
#align finset.has_sum_iff_compl Finset.hasSum_iff_compl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
(Multipliable fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(s.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
#align finset.summable_compl_iff Finset.summable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.Finite.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(hs.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
#align set.finite.summable_compl_iff Set.Finite.summable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_div_hasProd [DecidableEq β] (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) :
HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) (a / f b) := by
convert hf.update b 1 using 1
· ext n
rw [Function.update_apply]
· rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul]
#align has_sum_ite_sub_has_sum hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum
section TopologicalGroup
variable {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [CommGroup G] [TopologicalGroup G] {f : α → G}
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.vanishing (hf : Multipliable f) ⦃e : Set G⦄ (he : e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G)) :
∃ s : Finset α, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → (∏ k ∈ t, f k) ∈ e := by
classical
letI : UniformSpace G := TopologicalGroup.toUniformSpace G
have : UniformGroup G := comm_topologicalGroup_is_uniform
exact cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing.1 hf.hasProd.cauchySeq e he
#align summable.vanishing Summable.vanishing
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.tprod_vanishing (hf : Multipliable f) ⦃e : Set G⦄ (he : e ∈ 𝓝 1) :
∃ s : Finset α, ∀ t : Set α, Disjoint t s → (∏' b : t, f b) ∈ e := by
classical
letI : UniformSpace G := TopologicalGroup.toUniformSpace G
have : UniformGroup G := comm_topologicalGroup_is_uniform
exact cauchySeq_finset_iff_tprod_vanishing.1 hf.hasProd.cauchySeq e he
@[to_additive "The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover
the whole space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all such sums are zero."]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Group.lean | 347 | 356 | theorem tendsto_tprod_compl_atTop_one (f : α → G) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset α ↦ ∏' a : { x // x ∉ s }, f a) atTop (𝓝 1) := by |
classical
by_cases H : Multipliable f
· intro e he
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := H.tprod_vanishing he
rw [Filter.mem_map, mem_atTop_sets]
exact ⟨s, fun t hts ↦ hs _ <| Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun a ha has ↦ ha (hts has)⟩
· refine tendsto_const_nhds.congr fun _ ↦ (tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable ?_).symm
rwa [Finset.multipliable_compl_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.lucas_lehmer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10b4e499f43088dd3bb7b5796184ad5216648ab1"
def mersenne (p : ℕ) : ℕ :=
2 ^ p - 1
#align mersenne mersenne
theorem strictMono_mersenne : StrictMono mersenne := fun m n h ↦
(Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right <| Nat.one_le_pow _ _ two_pos).2 <| by gcongr; norm_num1
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_lt_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p < mersenne q ↔ p < q :=
strictMono_mersenne.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_lt_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_lt_mersenne
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_le_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p ≤ mersenne q ↔ p ≤ q :=
strictMono_mersenne.le_iff_le
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_le_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_le_mersenne
@[simp] theorem mersenne_zero : mersenne 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mersenne_pos {p : ℕ} : 0 < mersenne p ↔ 0 < p := mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 0)
#align mersenne_pos mersenne_pos
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_mersenne {p : ℕ} : 1 < mersenne p ↔ 1 < p :=
mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 1)
@[simp]
theorem succ_mersenne (k : ℕ) : mersenne k + 1 = 2 ^ k := by
rw [mersenne, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact one_le_pow_of_one_le (by norm_num) k
#align succ_mersenne succ_mersenne
namespace LucasLehmer
open Nat
def s : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => s i ^ 2 - 2
#align lucas_lehmer.s LucasLehmer.s
def sZMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => sZMod p i ^ 2 - 2
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod LucasLehmer.sZMod
def sMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4 % (2 ^ p - 1)
| i + 1 => (sMod p i ^ 2 - 2) % (2 ^ p - 1)
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod LucasLehmer.sMod
theorem mersenne_int_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) : (0 : ℤ) < 2 ^ p - 1 :=
sub_pos.2 <| mod_cast Nat.one_lt_two_pow hp
theorem mersenne_int_ne_zero (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) ≠ 0 :=
(mersenne_int_pos hp).ne'
#align lucas_lehmer.mersenne_int_ne_zero LucasLehmer.mersenne_int_ne_zero
theorem sMod_nonneg (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : 0 ≤ sMod p i := by
cases i <;> dsimp [sMod]
· exact sup_eq_right.mp rfl
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
exact mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_nonneg LucasLehmer.sMod_nonneg
theorem sMod_mod (p i : ℕ) : sMod p i % (2 ^ p - 1) = sMod p i := by cases i <;> simp [sMod]
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_mod LucasLehmer.sMod_mod
theorem sMod_lt (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : sMod p i < 2 ^ p - 1 := by
rw [← sMod_mod]
refine (Int.emod_lt _ (mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp)).trans_eq ?_
exact abs_of_nonneg (mersenne_int_pos hp).le
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_lt LucasLehmer.sMod_lt
theorem sZMod_eq_s (p' : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod (p' + 2) i = (s i : ZMod (2 ^ (p' + 2) - 1)) := by
induction' i with i ih
· dsimp [s, sZMod]
norm_num
· push_cast [s, sZMod, ih]; rfl
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod_eq_s LucasLehmer.sZMod_eq_s
-- These next two don't make good `norm_cast` lemmas.
theorem Int.natCast_pow_pred (b p : ℕ) (w : 0 < b) : ((b ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (b : ℤ) ^ p - 1 := by
have : 1 ≤ b ^ p := Nat.one_le_pow p b w
norm_cast
#align lucas_lehmer.int.coe_nat_pow_pred LucasLehmer.Int.natCast_pow_pred
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias Int.coe_nat_pow_pred := Int.natCast_pow_pred
theorem Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred (p : ℕ) : ((2 ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) :=
Int.natCast_pow_pred 2 p (by decide)
#align lucas_lehmer.int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred LucasLehmer.Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred
theorem sZMod_eq_sMod (p : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod p i = (sMod p i : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)) := by
induction i <;> push_cast [← Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred p, sMod, sZMod, *] <;> rfl
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod_eq_s_mod LucasLehmer.sZMod_eq_sMod
def lucasLehmerResidue (p : ℕ) : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1) :=
sZMod p (p - 2)
#align lucas_lehmer.lucas_lehmer_residue LucasLehmer.lucasLehmerResidue
theorem residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero (p : ℕ) (w : 1 < p) :
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 ↔ sMod p (p - 2) = 0 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue]
rw [sZMod_eq_sMod p]
constructor
· -- We want to use that fact that `0 ≤ s_mod p (p-2) < 2^p - 1`
-- and `lucas_lehmer_residue p = 0 → 2^p - 1 ∣ s_mod p (p-2)`.
intro h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, gt_iff_lt, ofNat_pos, pow_pos, cast_pred,
cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
apply Int.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nonneg_of_lt _ _ h <;> clear h
· exact sMod_nonneg _ (by positivity) _
· exact sMod_lt _ (by positivity) _
· intro h
rw [h]
simp
#align lucas_lehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_s_mod_eq_zero LucasLehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero
def LucasLehmerTest (p : ℕ) : Prop :=
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0
#align lucas_lehmer.lucas_lehmer_test LucasLehmer.LucasLehmerTest
-- Porting note: We have a fast `norm_num` extension, and we would rather use that than accidentally
-- have `simp` use `decide`!
def q (p : ℕ) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.minFac (mersenne p), Nat.minFac_pos (mersenne p)⟩
#align lucas_lehmer.q LucasLehmer.q
-- It would be nice to define this as (ℤ/qℤ)[x] / (x^2 - 3),
-- obtaining the ring structure for free,
-- but that seems to be more trouble than it's worth;
-- if it were easy to make the definition,
-- cardinality calculations would be somewhat more involved, too.
def X (q : ℕ+) : Type :=
ZMod q × ZMod q
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X LucasLehmer.X
open X
theorem two_lt_q (p' : ℕ) : 2 < q (p' + 2) := by
refine (minFac_prime (one_lt_mersenne.2 ?_).ne').two_le.lt_of_ne' ?_
· exact le_add_left _ _
· rw [Ne, minFac_eq_two_iff, mersenne, Nat.pow_succ']
exact Nat.two_not_dvd_two_mul_sub_one Nat.one_le_two_pow
#align lucas_lehmer.two_lt_q LucasLehmer.two_lt_q
theorem ω_pow_formula (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
∃ k : ℤ,
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) =
k * mersenne (p' + 2) * (ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ p' - 1 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue] at h
rw [sZMod_eq_s p'] at h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_right, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, gt_iff_lt, ofNat_pos,
pow_pos, cast_pred, cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
cases' h with k h
use k
replace h := congr_arg (fun n : ℤ => (n : X (q (p' + 2)))) h
-- coercion from ℤ to X q
dsimp at h
rw [closed_form] at h
replace h := congr_arg (fun x => ω ^ 2 ^ p' * x) h
dsimp at h
have t : 2 ^ p' + 2 ^ p' = 2 ^ (p' + 1) := by ring
rw [mul_add, ← pow_add ω, t, ← mul_pow ω ωb (2 ^ p'), ω_mul_ωb, one_pow] at h
rw [mul_comm, coe_mul] at h
rw [mul_comm _ (k : X (q (p' + 2)))] at h
replace h := eq_sub_of_add_eq h
have : 1 ≤ 2 ^ (p' + 2) := Nat.one_le_pow _ _ (by decide)
exact mod_cast h
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_pow_formula LucasLehmer.ω_pow_formula
theorem mersenne_coe_X (p : ℕ) : (mersenne p : X (q p)) = 0 := by
ext <;> simp [mersenne, q, ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, -pow_pos]
apply Nat.minFac_dvd
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.mersenne_coe_X LucasLehmer.mersenne_coe_X
theorem ω_pow_eq_neg_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) = -1 := by
cases' ω_pow_formula p' h with k w
rw [mersenne_coe_X] at w
simpa using w
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_pow_eq_neg_one LucasLehmer.ω_pow_eq_neg_one
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LucasLehmer.lean | 504 | 510 | theorem ω_pow_eq_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = 1 :=
calc
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = (ω ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1)) ^ 2 := by |
rw [← pow_mul, ← Nat.pow_succ]
_ = (-1) ^ 2 := by rw [ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h]
_ = 1 := by simp
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pi.Wallis
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import analysis.special_functions.stirling from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open scoped Topology Real Nat Asymptotics
open Finset Filter Nat Real
namespace Stirling
noncomputable def stirlingSeq (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
n ! / (√(2 * n : ℝ) * (n / exp 1) ^ n)
#align stirling.stirling_seq Stirling.stirlingSeq
@[simp]
theorem stirlingSeq_zero : stirlingSeq 0 = 0 := by
rw [stirlingSeq, cast_zero, mul_zero, Real.sqrt_zero, zero_mul, div_zero]
#align stirling.stirling_seq_zero Stirling.stirlingSeq_zero
@[simp]
theorem stirlingSeq_one : stirlingSeq 1 = exp 1 / √2 := by
rw [stirlingSeq, pow_one, factorial_one, cast_one, mul_one, mul_one_div, one_div_div]
#align stirling.stirling_seq_one Stirling.stirlingSeq_one
theorem log_stirlingSeq_formula (n : ℕ) :
log (stirlingSeq n) = Real.log n ! - 1 / 2 * Real.log (2 * n) - n * log (n / exp 1) := by
cases n
· simp
· rw [stirlingSeq, log_div, log_mul, sqrt_eq_rpow, log_rpow, Real.log_pow, tsub_tsub]
<;> positivity
-- Porting note: generalized from `n.succ` to `n`
#align stirling.log_stirling_seq_formula Stirling.log_stirlingSeq_formulaₓ
theorem log_stirlingSeq_diff_hasSum (m : ℕ) :
HasSum (fun k : ℕ => (1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(k + 1) + 1) * ((1 / (2 * ↑(m + 1) + 1)) ^ 2) ^ ↑(k + 1))
(log (stirlingSeq (m + 1)) - log (stirlingSeq (m + 2))) := by
let f (k : ℕ) := (1 : ℝ) / (2 * k + 1) * ((1 / (2 * ↑(m + 1) + 1)) ^ 2) ^ k
change HasSum (fun k => f (k + 1)) _
rw [hasSum_nat_add_iff]
convert (hasSum_log_one_add_inv m.cast_add_one_pos).mul_left ((↑(m + 1) : ℝ) + 1 / 2) using 1
· ext k
dsimp only [f]
rw [← pow_mul, pow_add]
push_cast
field_simp
ring
· have h : ∀ x ≠ (0 : ℝ), 1 + x⁻¹ = (x + 1) / x := fun x hx ↦ by field_simp [hx]
simp (disch := positivity) only [log_stirlingSeq_formula, log_div, log_mul, log_exp,
factorial_succ, cast_mul, cast_succ, cast_zero, range_one, sum_singleton, h]
ring
#align stirling.log_stirling_seq_diff_has_sum Stirling.log_stirlingSeq_diff_hasSum
theorem log_stirlingSeq'_antitone : Antitone (Real.log ∘ stirlingSeq ∘ succ) :=
antitone_nat_of_succ_le fun n =>
sub_nonneg.mp <| (log_stirlingSeq_diff_hasSum n).nonneg fun m => by positivity
#align stirling.log_stirling_seq'_antitone Stirling.log_stirlingSeq'_antitone
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Stirling.lean | 104 | 120 | theorem log_stirlingSeq_diff_le_geo_sum (n : ℕ) :
log (stirlingSeq (n + 1)) - log (stirlingSeq (n + 2)) ≤
((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2 / (1 - ((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2) := by |
have h_nonneg : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2 := sq_nonneg _
have g : HasSum (fun k : ℕ => (((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2) ^ ↑(k + 1))
(((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2 / (1 - ((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2)) := by
have := (hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h_nonneg ?_).mul_left (((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2)
· simp_rw [← _root_.pow_succ'] at this
exact this
rw [one_div, inv_pow]
exact inv_lt_one (one_lt_pow ((lt_add_iff_pos_left 1).mpr <| by positivity) two_ne_zero)
have hab (k : ℕ) : (1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(k + 1) + 1) * ((1 / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2) ^ ↑(k + 1) ≤
(((1 : ℝ) / (2 * ↑(n + 1) + 1)) ^ 2) ^ ↑(k + 1) := by
refine mul_le_of_le_one_left (pow_nonneg h_nonneg ↑(k + 1)) ?_
rw [one_div]
exact inv_le_one (le_add_of_nonneg_left <| by positivity)
exact hasSum_le hab (log_stirlingSeq_diff_hasSum n) g
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Caratheodory
#align_import measure_theory.measure.outer_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped Classical NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open OuterMeasure
section Extend
variable {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variable (m : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞)
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ h : P s, m s h
#align measure_theory.extend MeasureTheory.extend
theorem extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h := by simp [extend, h]
#align measure_theory.extend_eq MeasureTheory.extend_eq
theorem extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ := by simp [extend, h]
#align measure_theory.extend_eq_top MeasureTheory.extend_eq_top
theorem smul_extend {R} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c • extend m = extend fun s h => c • m s h := by
ext1 s
dsimp [extend]
by_cases h : P s
· simp [h]
· simp [h, ENNReal.smul_top, hc]
#align measure_theory.smul_extend MeasureTheory.smul_extend
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Induced.lean | 65 | 68 | theorem le_extend {s : α} (h : P s) : m s h ≤ extend m s := by |
simp only [extend, le_iInf_iff]
intro
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.fin.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3a2b5524a138b5d0b818b858b516d4ac8a484b03"
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
open Fin Nat Function
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
#align fin_zero_elim finZeroElim
namespace Fin
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
#align fin.elim0' Fin.elim0
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
#align fin.fin_to_nat Fin.coeToNat
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
#align fin.val_injective Fin.val_injective
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
#align fin.prop Fin.prop
#align fin.is_lt Fin.is_lt
#align fin.pos Fin.pos
#align fin.pos_iff_nonempty Fin.pos_iff_nonempty
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt $ Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align fin.equiv_subtype Fin.equivSubtype
#align fin.equiv_subtype_symm_apply Fin.equivSubtype_symm_apply
#align fin.equiv_subtype_apply Fin.equivSubtype_apply
section Add
#align fin.val_one Fin.val_one
#align fin.coe_one Fin.val_one
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
#align fin.coe_one' Fin.val_one'
-- Porting note: Delete this lemma after porting
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
#align fin.one_val Fin.val_one''
#align fin.mk_one Fin.mk_one
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero, Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
-- Porting note: here and in the next lemma, had to use `← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero`.
#align fin.nontrivial_iff_two_le Fin.nontrivial_iff_two_le
#align fin.subsingleton_iff_le_one Fin.subsingleton_iff_le_one
section Monoid
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`, `simp` can prove it with AddCommMonoid instance
protected theorem add_zero [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : k + 0 = k := by
simp only [add_def, val_zero', Nat.add_zero, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
#align fin.add_zero Fin.add_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`, `simp` can prove it with AddCommMonoid instance
protected theorem zero_add [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : 0 + k = k := by
simp [ext_iff, add_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
#align fin.zero_add Fin.zero_add
instance {a : ℕ} [NeZero n] : OfNat (Fin n) a where
ofNat := Fin.ofNat' a n.pos_of_neZero
instance inhabited (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Inhabited (Fin n) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
#align fin.default_eq_zero Fin.default_eq_zero
#align fin.val_add Fin.val_add
#align fin.coe_add Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
#align fin.coe_add_eq_ite Fin.val_add_eq_ite
#align fin.coe_add_one_of_lt Fin.val_add_one_of_lt
#align fin.last_add_one Fin.last_add_one
#align fin.coe_add_one Fin.val_add_one
#align fin.val_two Fin.val_two
--- Porting note: syntactically the same as the above
#align fin.coe_two Fin.val_two
section Pred
#align fin.pred Fin.pred
#align fin.coe_pred Fin.coe_pred
#align fin.succ_pred Fin.succ_pred
#align fin.pred_succ Fin.pred_succ
#align fin.pred_eq_iff_eq_succ Fin.pred_eq_iff_eq_succ
#align fin.pred_mk_succ Fin.pred_mk_succ
#align fin.pred_mk Fin.pred_mk
#align fin.pred_le_pred_iff Fin.pred_le_pred_iff
#align fin.pred_lt_pred_iff Fin.pred_lt_pred_iff
#align fin.pred_inj Fin.pred_inj
#align fin.pred_one Fin.pred_one
#align fin.pred_add_one Fin.pred_add_one
#align fin.sub_nat Fin.subNat
#align fin.coe_sub_nat Fin.coe_subNat
#align fin.sub_nat_mk Fin.subNat_mk
#align fin.pred_cast_succ_succ Fin.pred_castSucc_succ
#align fin.add_nat_sub_nat Fin.addNat_subNat
#align fin.sub_nat_add_nat Fin.subNat_addNat
#align fin.nat_add_sub_nat_cast Fin.natAdd_subNat_castₓ
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero', Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := a.castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
#align fin.cast_succ_pred_eq_pred_cast_succ Fin.castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases' a using cases with a
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,148 | 1,150 | theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by |
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Reflective
import Mathlib.Topology.StoneCech
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Limits
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
#align_import topology.category.CompHaus.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
universe v u
-- This was a global instance prior to #13170. We may experiment with removing it.
attribute [local instance] CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
open CategoryTheory
structure CompHaus where
toTop : TopCat
-- Porting note: Renamed field.
[is_compact : CompactSpace toTop]
[is_hausdorff : T2Space toTop]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus CompHaus
-- Porting note: `semireducible` -> `.default`.
@[simps (config := { rhsMd := .default })]
def compHausToTop : CompHaus.{u} ⥤ TopCat.{u} :=
inducedFunctor _ -- deriving Full, Faithful -- Porting note: deriving fails, adding manually.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus_to_Top compHausToTop
instance : compHausToTop.Full :=
show (inducedFunctor _).Full from inferInstance
instance : compHausToTop.Faithful :=
show (inducedFunctor _).Faithful from inferInstance
-- Porting note (#10754): Adding instance
instance (X : CompHaus) : CompactSpace (compHausToTop.obj X) :=
show CompactSpace X.toTop from inferInstance
-- Porting note (#10754): Adding instance
instance (X : CompHaus) : T2Space (compHausToTop.obj X) :=
show T2Space X.toTop from inferInstance
instance CompHaus.forget_reflectsIsomorphisms : (forget CompHaus.{u}).ReflectsIsomorphisms :=
⟨by intro A B f hf; exact CompHaus.isIso_of_bijective _ ((isIso_iff_bijective f).mp hf)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus.forget_reflects_isomorphisms CompHaus.forget_reflectsIsomorphisms
@[simps!]
def stoneCechObj (X : TopCat) : CompHaus :=
CompHaus.of (StoneCech X)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align StoneCech_obj stoneCechObj
noncomputable def stoneCechEquivalence (X : TopCat.{u}) (Y : CompHaus.{u}) :
(stoneCechObj X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X ⟶ compHausToTop.obj Y) where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ stoneCechUnit
continuous_toFun := f.2.comp (@continuous_stoneCechUnit X _) }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := stoneCechExtend f.2
continuous_toFun := continuous_stoneCechExtend f.2 }
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f : StoneCech X ⟶ Y, hf : Continuous f⟩
-- Porting note: `ext` fails.
apply ContinuousMap.ext
intro (x : StoneCech X)
refine congr_fun ?_ x
apply Continuous.ext_on denseRange_stoneCechUnit (continuous_stoneCechExtend _) hf
· rintro _ ⟨y, rfl⟩
apply congr_fun (stoneCechExtend_extends (hf.comp _)) y
apply continuous_stoneCechUnit
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f : (X : Type _) ⟶ Y, hf : Continuous f⟩
-- Porting note: `ext` fails.
apply ContinuousMap.ext
intro
exact congr_fun (stoneCechExtend_extends hf) _
#align stone_cech_equivalence stoneCechEquivalence
noncomputable def topToCompHaus : TopCat.{u} ⥤ CompHaus.{u} :=
Adjunction.leftAdjointOfEquiv stoneCechEquivalence.{u} fun _ _ _ _ _ => rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top_to_CompHaus topToCompHaus
theorem topToCompHaus_obj (X : TopCat) : ↥(topToCompHaus.obj X) = StoneCech X :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top_to_CompHaus_obj topToCompHaus_obj
noncomputable instance compHausToTop.reflective : Reflective compHausToTop where
L := topToCompHaus
adj := Adjunction.adjunctionOfEquivLeft _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus_to_Top.reflective compHausToTop.reflective
noncomputable instance compHausToTop.createsLimits : CreatesLimits compHausToTop :=
monadicCreatesLimits _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus_to_Top.creates_limits compHausToTop.createsLimits
instance CompHaus.hasLimits : Limits.HasLimits CompHaus :=
hasLimits_of_hasLimits_createsLimits compHausToTop
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus.has_limits CompHaus.hasLimits
instance CompHaus.hasColimits : Limits.HasColimits CompHaus :=
hasColimits_of_reflective compHausToTop
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus.has_colimits CompHaus.hasColimits
namespace CompHaus
def limitCone {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] (F : J ⥤ CompHaus.{max v u}) : Limits.Cone F :=
letI FF : J ⥤ TopCat := F ⋙ compHausToTop
{ pt := {
toTop := (TopCat.limitCone FF).pt
is_compact := by
show CompactSpace { u : ∀ j, F.obj j | ∀ {i j : J} (f : i ⟶ j), (F.map f) (u i) = u j }
rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
apply IsClosed.isCompact
have :
{ u : ∀ j, F.obj j | ∀ {i j : J} (f : i ⟶ j), F.map f (u i) = u j } =
⋂ (i : J) (j : J) (f : i ⟶ j), { u | F.map f (u i) = u j } := by
ext1
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [this]
apply isClosed_iInter
intro i
apply isClosed_iInter
intro j
apply isClosed_iInter
intro f
apply isClosed_eq
· exact (ContinuousMap.continuous (F.map f)).comp (continuous_apply i)
· exact continuous_apply j
is_hausdorff :=
show T2Space { u : ∀ j, F.obj j | ∀ {i j : J} (f : i ⟶ j), (F.map f) (u i) = u j } from
inferInstance }
π := {
app := fun j => (TopCat.limitCone FF).π.app j
naturality := by
intro _ _ f
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp only [comp_apply, Functor.const_obj_map, id_apply]
exact (hx f).symm } }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus.limit_cone CompHaus.limitCone
def limitConeIsLimit {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] (F : J ⥤ CompHaus.{max v u}) :
Limits.IsLimit.{v} (limitCone.{v,u} F) :=
letI FF : J ⥤ TopCat := F ⋙ compHausToTop
{ lift := fun S => (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit FF).lift (compHausToTop.mapCone S)
fac := fun S => (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit FF).fac (compHausToTop.mapCone S)
uniq := fun S => (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit FF).uniq (compHausToTop.mapCone S) }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus.limit_cone_is_limit CompHaus.limitConeIsLimit
theorem epi_iff_surjective {X Y : CompHaus.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Epi f ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
constructor
· dsimp [Function.Surjective]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ hf
let C := Set.range f
have hC : IsClosed C := (isCompact_range f.continuous).isClosed
let D := ({y} : Set Y)
have hD : IsClosed D := isClosed_singleton
have hCD : Disjoint C D := by
rw [Set.disjoint_singleton_right]
rintro ⟨y', hy'⟩
exact hy y' hy'
obtain ⟨φ, hφ0, hφ1, hφ01⟩ := exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed hC hD hCD
haveI : CompactSpace (ULift.{u} <| Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) := Homeomorph.ulift.symm.compactSpace
haveI : T2Space (ULift.{u} <| Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) := Homeomorph.ulift.symm.t2Space
let Z := of (ULift.{u} <| Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1)
let g : Y ⟶ Z :=
⟨fun y' => ⟨⟨φ y', hφ01 y'⟩⟩,
continuous_uLift_up.comp (φ.continuous.subtype_mk fun y' => hφ01 y')⟩
let h : Y ⟶ Z := ⟨fun _ => ⟨⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.mpr zero_le_one⟩⟩, continuous_const⟩
have H : h = g := by
rw [← cancel_epi f]
ext x
-- Porting note: `ext` doesn't apply these two lemmas.
apply ULift.ext
apply Subtype.ext
dsimp
-- Porting note: This `change` is not ideal.
-- I think lean is having issues understanding when a `ContinuousMap` should be considered
-- as a morphism.
-- TODO(?): Make morphisms in `CompHaus` (and other topological categories)
-- into a one-field-structure.
change 0 = φ (f x)
simp only [hφ0 (Set.mem_range_self x), Pi.zero_apply]
apply_fun fun e => (e y).down.1 at H
dsimp [Z] at H
change 0 = φ y at H
simp only [hφ1 (Set.mem_singleton y), Pi.one_apply] at H
exact zero_ne_one H
· rw [← CategoryTheory.epi_iff_surjective]
apply (forget CompHaus).epi_of_epi_map
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align CompHaus.epi_iff_surjective CompHaus.epi_iff_surjective
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/CompHaus/Basic.lean | 380 | 392 | theorem mono_iff_injective {X Y : CompHaus.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f := by |
constructor
· intro hf x₁ x₂ h
let g₁ : of PUnit ⟶ X := ⟨fun _ => x₁, continuous_const⟩
let g₂ : of PUnit ⟶ X := ⟨fun _ => x₂, continuous_const⟩
have : g₁ ≫ f = g₂ ≫ f := by
ext
exact h
rw [cancel_mono] at this
apply_fun fun e => e PUnit.unit at this
exact this
· rw [← CategoryTheory.mono_iff_injective]
apply (forget CompHaus).mono_of_mono_map
|
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 361 | 363 | theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by |
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
universe uR uA uM₁ uM₂
variable {R : Type uR} {A : Type uA} {M₁ : Type uM₁} {M₂ : Type uM₂}
open TensorProduct
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
namespace QuadraticForm
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A]
variable [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂]
variable [Algebra R A] [Module R M₁] [Module A M₁]
variable [SMulCommClass R A M₁] [SMulCommClass A R M₁] [IsScalarTower R A M₁]
variable [Module R M₂] [Invertible (2 : R)]
variable (R A) in
-- `noncomputable` is a performance workaround for mathlib4#7103
noncomputable def tensorDistrib :
QuadraticForm A M₁ ⊗[R] QuadraticForm R M₂ →ₗ[A] QuadraticForm A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) :=
letI : Invertible (2 : A) := (Invertible.map (algebraMap R A) 2).copy 2 (map_ofNat _ _).symm
-- while `letI`s would produce a better term than `let`, they would make this already-slow
-- definition even slower.
let toQ := BilinForm.toQuadraticFormLinearMap A A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂)
let tmulB := BilinForm.tensorDistrib R A (M₁ := M₁) (M₂ := M₂)
let toB := AlgebraTensorModule.map
(QuadraticForm.associated : QuadraticForm A M₁ →ₗ[A] BilinForm A M₁)
(QuadraticForm.associated : QuadraticForm R M₂ →ₗ[R] BilinForm R M₂)
toQ ∘ₗ tmulB ∘ₗ toB
-- TODO: make the RHS `MulOpposite.op (Q₂ m₂) • Q₁ m₁` so that this has a nicer defeq for
-- `R = A` of `Q₁ m₁ * Q₂ m₂`.
@[simp]
theorem tensorDistrib_tmul (Q₁ : QuadraticForm A M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (m₁ : M₁) (m₂ : M₂) :
tensorDistrib R A (Q₁ ⊗ₜ Q₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = Q₂ m₂ • Q₁ m₁ :=
letI : Invertible (2 : A) := (Invertible.map (algebraMap R A) 2).copy 2 (map_ofNat _ _).symm
(BilinForm.tensorDistrib_tmul _ _ _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _
(associated_eq_self_apply _ _ _) (associated_eq_self_apply _ _ _)
-- `noncomputable` is a performance workaround for mathlib4#7103
protected noncomputable abbrev tmul (Q₁ : QuadraticForm A M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
QuadraticForm A (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) :=
tensorDistrib R A (Q₁ ⊗ₜ[R] Q₂)
theorem associated_tmul [Invertible (2 : A)] (Q₁ : QuadraticForm A M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
associated (R := A) (Q₁.tmul Q₂)
= (associated (R := A) Q₁).tmul (associated (R := R) Q₂) := by
rw [QuadraticForm.tmul, tensorDistrib, BilinForm.tmul]
dsimp
have : Subsingleton (Invertible (2 : A)) := inferInstance
convert associated_left_inverse A ((associated_isSymm A Q₁).tmul (associated_isSymm R Q₂))
theorem polarBilin_tmul [Invertible (2 : A)] (Q₁ : QuadraticForm A M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
polarBilin (Q₁.tmul Q₂) = ⅟(2 : A) • (polarBilin Q₁).tmul (polarBilin Q₂) := by
simp_rw [← two_nsmul_associated A, ← two_nsmul_associated R, BilinForm.tmul, tmul_smul,
← smul_tmul', map_nsmul, associated_tmul]
rw [smul_comm (_ : A) (_ : ℕ), ← smul_assoc, two_smul _ (_ : A), invOf_two_add_invOf_two,
one_smul]
variable (A) in
-- `noncomputable` is a performance workaround for mathlib4#7103
protected noncomputable def baseChange (Q : QuadraticForm R M₂) : QuadraticForm A (A ⊗[R] M₂) :=
QuadraticForm.tmul (R := R) (A := A) (M₁ := A) (M₂ := M₂) (QuadraticForm.sq (R := A)) Q
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (Q : QuadraticForm R M₂) (a : A) (m₂ : M₂) :
Q.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ m₂) = Q m₂ • (a * a) :=
tensorDistrib_tmul _ _ _ _
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/TensorProduct.lean | 95 | 99 | theorem associated_baseChange [Invertible (2 : A)] (Q : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
associated (R := A) (Q.baseChange A) = (associated (R := R) Q).baseChange A := by |
dsimp only [QuadraticForm.baseChange, LinearMap.baseChange]
rw [associated_tmul (QuadraticForm.sq (R := A)) Q, associated_sq]
exact rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Basic
#align_import algebra.direct_sum.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
open Function
universe u v w u₁
variable (ι : Type v) [dec_ι : DecidableEq ι] (β : ι → Type w)
def DirectSum [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : Type _ :=
-- Porting note: Failed to synthesize
-- Π₀ i, β i deriving AddCommMonoid, Inhabited
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
Π₀ i, β i
#align direct_sum DirectSum
-- Porting note (#10754): Added inhabited instance manually
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : Inhabited (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (Π₀ i, β i))
-- Porting note (#10754): Added addCommMonoid instance manually
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : AddCommMonoid (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (Π₀ i, β i))
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : DFunLike (DirectSum ι β) _ fun i : ι => β i :=
inferInstanceAs (DFunLike (Π₀ i, β i) _ _)
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] : CoeFun (DirectSum ι β) fun _ => ∀ i : ι, β i :=
inferInstanceAs (CoeFun (Π₀ i, β i) fun _ => ∀ i : ι, β i)
scoped[DirectSum] notation3 "⨁ "(...)", "r:(scoped f => DirectSum _ f) => r
-- Porting note: The below recreates some of the lean3 notation, not fully yet
-- section
-- open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
-- syntax (name := bigdirectsum) "⨁ " extBinders ", " term : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigdirectsum)
-- | `(⨁ $_:ident, $y:ident → $z:ident) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $y ↦ $z))
-- | `(⨁ $x:ident, $p) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $x ↦ $p))
-- | `(⨁ $_:ident : $t:ident, $p) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(⨁ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) => `(DirectSum _ (fun $x ↦ fun $y ↦ $p))
-- end
instance [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, DecidableEq (β i)] : DecidableEq (DirectSum ι β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq (Π₀ i, β i)
namespace DirectSum
variable {ι}
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)]
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (i : ι) : (0 : ⨁ i, β i) i = 0 :=
rfl
#align direct_sum.zero_apply DirectSum.zero_apply
variable {β}
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : ⨁ i, β i) (i : ι) : (g₁ + g₂) i = g₁ i + g₂ i :=
rfl
#align direct_sum.add_apply DirectSum.add_apply
variable (β)
def mk (s : Finset ι) : (∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i.1) →+ ⨁ i, β i where
toFun := DFinsupp.mk s
map_add' _ _ := DFinsupp.mk_add
map_zero' := DFinsupp.mk_zero
#align direct_sum.mk DirectSum.mk
def of (i : ι) : β i →+ ⨁ i, β i :=
DFinsupp.singleAddHom β i
#align direct_sum.of DirectSum.of
@[simp]
theorem of_eq_same (i : ι) (x : β i) : (of _ i x) i = x :=
DFinsupp.single_eq_same
#align direct_sum.of_eq_same DirectSum.of_eq_same
theorem of_eq_of_ne (i j : ι) (x : β i) (h : i ≠ j) : (of _ i x) j = 0 :=
DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
#align direct_sum.of_eq_of_ne DirectSum.of_eq_of_ne
lemma of_apply {i : ι} (j : ι) (x : β i) : of β i x j = if h : i = j then Eq.recOn h x else 0 :=
DFinsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_zero [∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] : (0 : ⨁ i, β i).support = ∅ :=
DFinsupp.support_zero
#align direct_sum.support_zero DirectSum.support_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_of [∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (i : ι) (x : β i) (h : x ≠ 0) :
(of _ i x).support = {i} :=
DFinsupp.support_single_ne_zero h
#align direct_sum.support_of DirectSum.support_of
theorem support_of_subset [∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] {i : ι} {b : β i} :
(of _ i b).support ⊆ {i} :=
DFinsupp.support_single_subset
#align direct_sum.support_of_subset DirectSum.support_of_subset
theorem sum_support_of [∀ (i : ι) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (x : ⨁ i, β i) :
(∑ i ∈ x.support, of β i (x i)) = x :=
DFinsupp.sum_single
#align direct_sum.sum_support_of DirectSum.sum_support_of
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Basic.lean | 155 | 159 | theorem sum_univ_of [Fintype ι] (x : ⨁ i, β i) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.univ, of β i (x i) = x := by |
apply DFinsupp.ext (fun i ↦ ?_)
rw [DFinsupp.finset_sum_apply]
simp [of_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.AEval
#align_import data.polynomial.module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"63417e01fbc711beaf25fa73b6edb395c0cfddd0"
universe u v
open Polynomial BigOperators
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def PolynomialModule (R M : Type*) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] := ℕ →₀ M
#align polynomial_module PolynomialModule
variable (R M : Type*) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
-- Porting note: stated instead of deriving
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (PolynomialModule R M) := Finsupp.instInhabited
noncomputable instance : AddCommGroup (PolynomialModule R M) := Finsupp.instAddCommGroup
variable {M}
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
namespace PolynomialModule
@[nolint unusedArguments]
noncomputable instance : Module S (PolynomialModule R M) :=
Finsupp.module ℕ M
instance instFunLike : FunLike (PolynomialModule R M) ℕ M :=
Finsupp.instFunLike
instance : CoeFun (PolynomialModule R M) fun _ => ℕ → M :=
Finsupp.instCoeFun
theorem zero_apply (i : ℕ) : (0 : PolynomialModule R M) i = 0 :=
Finsupp.zero_apply
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : PolynomialModule R M) (a : ℕ) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
Finsupp.add_apply g₁ g₂ a
noncomputable def single (i : ℕ) : M →+ PolynomialModule R M :=
Finsupp.singleAddHom i
#align polynomial_module.single PolynomialModule.single
theorem single_apply (i : ℕ) (m : M) (n : ℕ) : single R i m n = ite (i = n) m 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
#align polynomial_module.single_apply PolynomialModule.single_apply
noncomputable def lsingle (i : ℕ) : M →ₗ[R] PolynomialModule R M :=
Finsupp.lsingle i
#align polynomial_module.lsingle PolynomialModule.lsingle
theorem lsingle_apply (i : ℕ) (m : M) (n : ℕ) : lsingle R i m n = ite (i = n) m 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
#align polynomial_module.lsingle_apply PolynomialModule.lsingle_apply
theorem single_smul (i : ℕ) (r : R) (m : M) : single R i (r • m) = r • single R i m :=
(lsingle R i).map_smul r m
#align polynomial_module.single_smul PolynomialModule.single_smul
variable {R}
theorem induction_linear {P : PolynomialModule R M → Prop} (f : PolynomialModule R M) (h0 : P 0)
(hadd : ∀ f g, P f → P g → P (f + g)) (hsingle : ∀ a b, P (single R a b)) : P f :=
Finsupp.induction_linear f h0 hadd hsingle
#align polynomial_module.induction_linear PolynomialModule.induction_linear
noncomputable instance polynomialModule : Module R[X] (PolynomialModule R M) :=
inferInstanceAs (Module R[X] (Module.AEval' (Finsupp.lmapDomain M R Nat.succ)))
#align polynomial_module.polynomial_module PolynomialModule.polynomialModule
lemma smul_def (f : R[X]) (m : PolynomialModule R M) :
f • m = aeval (Finsupp.lmapDomain M R Nat.succ) f m := by
rfl
instance (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
IsScalarTower S R (PolynomialModule R M) :=
Finsupp.isScalarTower _ _
instance isScalarTower' (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower S R M] : IsScalarTower S R[X] (PolynomialModule R M) := by
haveI : IsScalarTower R R[X] (PolynomialModule R M) :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsScalarTower R R[X] <| Module.AEval' <| Finsupp.lmapDomain M R Nat.succ
constructor
intro x y z
rw [← @IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S R, ← @IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S R, smul_assoc]
#align polynomial_module.is_scalar_tower' PolynomialModule.isScalarTower'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Module/Basic.lean | 123 | 135 | theorem monomial_smul_single (i : ℕ) (r : R) (j : ℕ) (m : M) :
monomial i r • single R j m = single R (i + j) (r • m) := by |
simp only [LinearMap.mul_apply, Polynomial.aeval_monomial, LinearMap.pow_apply,
Module.algebraMap_end_apply, smul_def]
induction i generalizing r j m with
| zero =>
rw [Function.iterate_zero, zero_add]
exact Finsupp.smul_single r j m
| succ n hn =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ, Function.comp_apply, add_assoc, ← hn]
congr 2
rw [Nat.one_add]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_single
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.join from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
attribute [simp] join
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem join_singleton (l : List α) : [l].join = l := by rw [join, join, append_nil]
#align list.join_singleton List.join_singleton
@[simp]
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] => iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| l :: L => by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
#align list.join_eq_nil List.join_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : List (List α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ := by
induction L₁
· rfl
· simp [*]
#align list.join_append List.join_append
theorem join_concat (L : List (List α)) (l : List α) : join (L.concat l) = join L ++ l := by simp
#align list.join_concat List.join_concat
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_not_isEmpty :
∀ {L : List (List α)}, join (L.filter fun l => !l.isEmpty) = L.join
| [] => rfl
| [] :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L), isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
| (a :: l) :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L)]
#align list.join_filter_empty_eq_ff List.join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-25")] alias join_filter_isEmpty_eq_false := join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_ne_nil [DecidablePred fun l : List α => l ≠ []] {L : List (List α)} :
join (L.filter fun l => l ≠ []) = L.join := by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty, ← isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
#align list.join_filter_ne_nil List.join_filter_ne_nil
theorem join_join (l : List (List (List α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.join_join List.join_join
lemma length_join' (L : List (List α)) : length (join L) = Nat.sum (map length L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, Nat.sum_cons, length_append]]
lemma countP_join' (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L : List (List α), countP p L.join = Nat.sum (L.map (countP p))
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [join, countP_append, map_cons, Nat.sum_cons, countP_join' _ l]
lemma count_join' [BEq α] (L : List (List α)) (a : α) :
L.join.count a = Nat.sum (L.map (count a)) := countP_join' _ _
lemma length_bind' (l : List α) (f : α → List β) :
length (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (length ∘ f) l) := by rw [List.bind, length_join', map_map]
lemma countP_bind' (p : β → Bool) (l : List α) (f : α → List β) :
countP p (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (countP p ∘ f) l) := by rw [List.bind, countP_join', map_map]
lemma count_bind' [BEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → List β) (x : β) :
count x (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (count x ∘ f) l) := countP_bind' _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_nil {l : List α} {f : α → List β} : List.bind l f = [] ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = [] :=
join_eq_nil.trans <| by
simp only [mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
#align list.bind_eq_nil List.bind_eq_nil
theorem take_sum_join' (L : List (List α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) = (L.take i).join := by
induction L generalizing i
· simp
· cases i <;> simp [take_append, *]
theorem drop_sum_join' (L : List (List α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) = (L.drop i).join := by
induction L generalizing i
· simp
· cases i <;> simp [drop_append, *]
theorem drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get (L : List α) (i : Fin L.length) :
(L.take (i + 1)).drop i = [get L i] := by
induction' L with head tail ih
· exact (Nat.not_succ_le_zero i i.isLt).elim
rcases i with ⟨_ | i, hi⟩
· simp
· simpa using ih ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get (since := "2023-01-10")]
theorem drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nthLe (L : List α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i + 1)).drop i = [nthLe L i hi] := by
induction' L with head tail generalizing i
· simp only [length] at hi
exact (Nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim
cases' i with i hi
· simp
rfl
have : i < tail.length := by simpa using hi
simp [*]
rfl
#align list.drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le List.drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nthLe
theorem drop_take_succ_join_eq_get' (L : List (List α)) (i : Fin L.length) :
(L.join.take (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take (i + 1)))).drop (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) =
get L i := by
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i + 1)).map length).take i := by
simp [map_take, take_take, Nat.min_eq_left]
simp only [this, length_map, take_sum_join', drop_sum_join', drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get,
join, append_nil]
#noalign list.drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le
#noalign list.sum_take_map_length_lt1
#noalign list.sum_take_map_length_lt2
#noalign list.nth_le_join
theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : List (List α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' := by
refine ⟨fun H => by simp [H], ?_⟩
rintro ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩
apply ext_get
· have : length (map length L) = length (map length L') := by rw [length_eq]
simpa using this
· intro n h₁ h₂
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_get', ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_get', join_eq, length_eq]
#align list.eq_iff_join_eq List.eq_iff_join_eq
theorem join_drop_length_sub_one {L : List (List α)} (h : L ≠ []) :
(L.drop (L.length - 1)).join = L.getLast h := by
induction L using List.reverseRecOn
· cases h rfl
· simp
#align list.join_drop_length_sub_one List.join_drop_length_sub_one
| Mathlib/Data/List/Join.lean | 188 | 192 | theorem append_join_map_append (L : List (List α)) (x : List α) :
x ++ (L.map (· ++ x)).join = (L.map (x ++ ·)).join ++ x := by |
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rw [map_nil, join, append_nil, map_nil, join, nil_append]
· rw [map_cons, join, map_cons, join, append_assoc, ih, append_assoc, append_assoc]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 366 | 367 | theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by |
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.principal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Order
namespace Ordinal
-- Porting note: commented out, doesn't seem necessary
--local infixr:0 "^" => @pow Ordinal Ordinal Ordinal.hasPow
def Principal (op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < o → b < o → op a b < o
#align ordinal.principal Ordinal.Principal
theorem principal_iff_principal_swap {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal} {o : Ordinal} :
Principal op o ↔ Principal (Function.swap op) o := by
constructor <;> exact fun h a b ha hb => h hb ha
#align ordinal.principal_iff_principal_swap Ordinal.principal_iff_principal_swap
theorem principal_zero {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal} : Principal op 0 := fun a _ h =>
(Ordinal.not_lt_zero a h).elim
#align ordinal.principal_zero Ordinal.principal_zero
@[simp]
theorem principal_one_iff {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal} : Principal op 1 ↔ op 0 0 = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a b ha hb => ?_⟩
· rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
exact h zero_lt_one zero_lt_one
· rwa [lt_one_iff_zero, ha, hb] at *
#align ordinal.principal_one_iff Ordinal.principal_one_iff
theorem Principal.iterate_lt {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal} {a o : Ordinal} (hao : a < o)
(ho : Principal op o) (n : ℕ) : (op a)^[n] a < o := by
induction' n with n hn
· rwa [Function.iterate_zero]
· rw [Function.iterate_succ']
exact ho hao hn
#align ordinal.principal.iterate_lt Ordinal.Principal.iterate_lt
theorem op_eq_self_of_principal {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal} {a o : Ordinal.{u}} (hao : a < o)
(H : IsNormal (op a)) (ho : Principal op o) (ho' : IsLimit o) : op a o = o := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (H.self_le _)
rw [← IsNormal.bsup_eq.{u, u} H ho', bsup_le_iff]
exact fun b hbo => (ho hao hbo).le
#align ordinal.op_eq_self_of_principal Ordinal.op_eq_self_of_principal
theorem nfp_le_of_principal {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal} {a o : Ordinal} (hao : a < o)
(ho : Principal op o) : nfp (op a) a ≤ o :=
nfp_le fun n => (ho.iterate_lt hao n).le
#align ordinal.nfp_le_of_principal Ordinal.nfp_le_of_principal
#adaptation_note
theorem principal_nfp_blsub₂ (op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o : Ordinal) :
Principal op (nfp (fun o' => blsub₂.{u, u, u} o' o' (@fun a _ b _ => op a b)) o) :=
fun a b ha hb => by
rw [lt_nfp] at *
cases' ha with m hm
cases' hb with n hn
cases' le_total
((fun o' => blsub₂.{u, u, u} o' o' (@fun a _ b _ => op a b))^[m] o)
((fun o' => blsub₂.{u, u, u} o' o' (@fun a _ b _ => op a b))^[n] o) with h h
· use n + 1
rw [Function.iterate_succ']
exact lt_blsub₂.{u} (@fun a _ b _ => op a b) (hm.trans_le h) hn
· use m + 1
rw [Function.iterate_succ']
exact lt_blsub₂.{u} (@fun a _ b _ => op a b) hm (hn.trans_le h)
#align ordinal.principal_nfp_blsub₂ Ordinal.principal_nfp_blsub₂
theorem unbounded_principal (op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal) :
Set.Unbounded (· < ·) { o | Principal op o } := fun o =>
⟨_, principal_nfp_blsub₂ op o, (le_nfp _ o).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.unbounded_principal Ordinal.unbounded_principal
theorem principal_add_one : Principal (· + ·) 1 :=
principal_one_iff.2 <| zero_add 0
#align ordinal.principal_add_one Ordinal.principal_add_one
theorem principal_add_of_le_one {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≤ 1) : Principal (· + ·) o := by
rcases le_one_iff.1 ho with (rfl | rfl)
· exact principal_zero
· exact principal_add_one
#align ordinal.principal_add_of_le_one Ordinal.principal_add_of_le_one
theorem principal_add_isLimit {o : Ordinal} (ho₁ : 1 < o) (ho : Principal (· + ·) o) :
o.IsLimit := by
refine ⟨fun ho₀ => ?_, fun a hao => ?_⟩
· rw [ho₀] at ho₁
exact not_lt_of_gt zero_lt_one ho₁
· rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with ha | ha
· rw [ha, succ_zero]
exact ho₁
· refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (ho hao hao)
rwa [← add_one_eq_succ, add_le_add_iff_left, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.principal_add_is_limit Ordinal.principal_add_isLimit
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Principal.lean | 143 | 153 | theorem principal_add_iff_add_left_eq_self {o : Ordinal} :
Principal (· + ·) o ↔ ∀ a < o, a + o = o := by |
refine ⟨fun ho a hao => ?_, fun h a b hao hbo => ?_⟩
· cases' lt_or_le 1 o with ho₁ ho₁
· exact op_eq_self_of_principal hao (add_isNormal a) ho (principal_add_isLimit ho₁ ho)
· rcases le_one_iff.1 ho₁ with (rfl | rfl)
· exact (Ordinal.not_lt_zero a hao).elim
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at hao
rw [hao, zero_add]
· rw [← h a hao]
exact (add_isNormal a).strictMono hbo
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.AbsMax
#align_import analysis.complex.open_mapping from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f9dd3204df14a0749cd456fac1e6849dfe7d2b88"
open Set Filter Metric Complex
open scoped Topology
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {U : Set E} {f : ℂ → ℂ} {g : E → ℂ}
{z₀ w : ℂ} {ε r m : ℝ}
theorem DiffContOnCl.ball_subset_image_closedBall (h : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z₀ r)) (hr : 0 < r)
(hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere z₀ r, ε ≤ ‖f z - f z₀‖) (hz₀ : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z ≠ f z₀) :
ball (f z₀) (ε / 2) ⊆ f '' closedBall z₀ r := by
rintro v hv
have h1 : DiffContOnCl ℂ (fun z => f z - v) (ball z₀ r) := h.sub_const v
have h2 : ContinuousOn (fun z => ‖f z - v‖) (closedBall z₀ r) :=
continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn (closure_ball z₀ hr.ne.symm ▸ h1.continuousOn)
have h3 : AnalyticOn ℂ f (ball z₀ r) := h.differentiableOn.analyticOn isOpen_ball
have h4 : ∀ z ∈ sphere z₀ r, ε / 2 ≤ ‖f z - v‖ := fun z hz => by
linarith [hf z hz, show ‖v - f z₀‖ < ε / 2 from mem_ball.mp hv,
norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub (f z) v (f z₀)]
have h5 : ‖f z₀ - v‖ < ε / 2 := by simpa [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm] using mem_ball.mp hv
obtain ⟨z, hz1, hz2⟩ : ∃ z ∈ ball z₀ r, IsLocalMin (fun z => ‖f z - v‖) z :=
exists_isLocalMin_mem_ball h2 (mem_closedBall_self hr.le) fun z hz => h5.trans_le (h4 z hz)
refine ⟨z, ball_subset_closedBall hz1, sub_eq_zero.mp ?_⟩
have h6 := h1.differentiableOn.eventually_differentiableAt (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds hz1)
refine (eventually_eq_or_eq_zero_of_isLocalMin_norm h6 hz2).resolve_left fun key => ?_
have h7 : ∀ᶠ w in 𝓝 z, f w = f z := by filter_upwards [key] with h; field_simp
replace h7 : ∃ᶠ w in 𝓝[≠] z, f w = f z := (h7.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds).frequently
have h8 : IsPreconnected (ball z₀ r) := (convex_ball z₀ r).isPreconnected
have h9 := h3.eqOn_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq analyticOn_const h8 hz1 h7
have h10 : f z = f z₀ := (h9 (mem_ball_self hr)).symm
exact not_eventually.mpr hz₀ (mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds z₀ hr) (h10 ▸ h9))
#align diff_cont_on_cl.ball_subset_image_closed_ball DiffContOnCl.ball_subset_image_closedBall
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/OpenMapping.lean | 77 | 106 | theorem AnalyticAt.eventually_constant_or_nhds_le_map_nhds_aux (hf : AnalyticAt ℂ f z₀) :
(∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = f z₀) ∨ 𝓝 (f z₀) ≤ map f (𝓝 z₀) := by |
/- The function `f` is analytic in a neighborhood of `z₀`; by the isolated zeros principle, if `f`
is not constant in a neighborhood of `z₀`, then it is nonzero, and therefore bounded below, on
every small enough circle around `z₀` and then `DiffContOnCl.ball_subset_image_closedBall`
provides an explicit ball centered at `f z₀` contained in the range of `f`. -/
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun h => ?_
refine (nhds_basis_ball.le_basis_iff (nhds_basis_closedBall.map f)).mpr fun R hR => ?_
have h1 := (hf.eventually_eq_or_eventually_ne analyticAt_const).resolve_left h
have h2 : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, AnalyticAt ℂ f z := (isOpen_analyticAt ℂ f).eventually_mem hf
obtain ⟨ρ, hρ, h3, h4⟩ :
∃ ρ > 0, AnalyticOn ℂ f (closedBall z₀ ρ) ∧ ∀ z ∈ closedBall z₀ ρ, z ≠ z₀ → f z ≠ f z₀ := by
simpa only [setOf_and, subset_inter_iff] using
nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.mp (h2.and (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.mp h1))
replace h3 : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z₀ ρ) :=
⟨h3.differentiableOn.mono ball_subset_closedBall,
(closure_ball z₀ hρ.lt.ne.symm).symm ▸ h3.continuousOn⟩
let r := ρ ⊓ R
have hr : 0 < r := lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨hρ, hR⟩
have h5 : closedBall z₀ r ⊆ closedBall z₀ ρ := closedBall_subset_closedBall inf_le_left
have h6 : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z₀ r) := h3.mono (ball_subset_ball inf_le_left)
have h7 : ∀ z ∈ sphere z₀ r, f z ≠ f z₀ := fun z hz =>
h4 z (h5 (sphere_subset_closedBall hz)) (ne_of_mem_sphere hz hr.ne.symm)
have h8 : (sphere z₀ r).Nonempty := NormedSpace.sphere_nonempty.mpr hr.le
have h9 : ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x - f z₀‖) (sphere z₀ r) := continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn
((h6.sub_const (f z₀)).continuousOn_ball.mono sphere_subset_closedBall)
obtain ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := (isCompact_sphere z₀ r).exists_isMinOn h8 h9
refine ⟨‖f x - f z₀‖ / 2, half_pos (norm_sub_pos_iff.mpr (h7 x hx)), ?_⟩
exact (h6.ball_subset_image_closedBall hr (fun z hz => hfx hz) (not_eventually.mp h)).trans
(image_subset f (closedBall_subset_closedBall inf_le_right))
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Real
open Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
#align real.sin_pi Real.sin_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
#align real.cos_pi Real.cos_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
#align real.sin_two_pi Real.sin_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
#align real.cos_two_pi Real.cos_two_pi
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_antiperiodic Real.sin_antiperiodic
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align real.sin_periodic Real.sin_periodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
#align real.sin_add_pi Real.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
#align real.sin_add_two_pi Real.sin_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align real.sin_sub_pi Real.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.sin_sub_two_pi Real.sin_sub_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align real.sin_pi_sub Real.sin_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.sin_two_pi_sub Real.sin_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align real.sin_nat_mul_pi Real.sin_nat_mul_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
#align real.sin_int_mul_pi Real.sin_int_mul_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi Real.sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi Real.sin_add_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Real.sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi Real.sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Real.sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub Real.sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.coe_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_antiperiodic Real.cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
#align real.cos_periodic Real.cos_periodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
#align real.cos_add_pi Real.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
#align real.cos_add_two_pi Real.cos_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
#align real.cos_sub_pi Real.cos_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
#align real.cos_sub_two_pi Real.cos_sub_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
#align real.cos_pi_sub Real.cos_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
#align real.cos_two_pi_sub Real.cos_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
#align real.cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
#align real.cos_add_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_add_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
#align real.cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi Real.cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
#align real.cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi Real.cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.coe_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi Real.cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], but simp can prove it
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
#align real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
#align real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
#align real.sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo Real.sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
#align real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
#align real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
#align real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
#align real.sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le Real.sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
#align real.sin_pi_div_two Real.sin_pi_div_two
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
#align real.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
#align real.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
#align real.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
#align real.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
#align real.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
#align real.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
#align real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
#align real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
#align real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le Real.cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align real.cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le Real.cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
#align real.sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq Real.sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
#align real.cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq Real.cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.sin_ne_zero_iff
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
#align real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq Real.sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel ((Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero _ _).2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
#align real.cos_eq_one_iff Real.cos_eq_one_iff
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align real.cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt Real.cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
#align real.sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two Real.sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_sin Real.strictMonoOn_sin
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
#align real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
#align real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two Real.cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
#align real.strict_anti_on_cos Real.strictAntiOn_cos
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
#align real.cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi Real.cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
#align real.sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two Real.sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_sin Real.injOn_sin
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
#align real.inj_on_cos Real.injOn_cos
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
#align real.surj_on_sin Real.surjOn_sin
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
#align real.surj_on_cos Real.surjOn_cos
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
#align real.sin_mem_Icc Real.sin_mem_Icc
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
#align real.cos_mem_Icc Real.cos_mem_Icc
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
#align real.maps_to_sin Real.mapsTo_sin
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
#align real.maps_to_cos Real.mapsTo_cos
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
#align real.bij_on_sin Real.bijOn_sin
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
#align real.bij_on_cos Real.bijOn_cos
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
#align real.range_cos Real.range_cos
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
#align real.range_sin Real.range_sin
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
#align real.range_cos_infinite Real.range_cos_infinite
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
#align real.range_sin_infinite Real.range_sin_infinite
namespace Complex
open Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 1,119 | 1,121 | theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 := by |
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.BilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Minpoly
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Trace
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PrimitiveElement
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.MinpolyDiv
#align_import ring_theory.trace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
universe u v w z
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing T]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R T]
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
variable {ι κ : Type w} [Fintype ι]
open FiniteDimensional
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
open LinearMap
open Matrix
open scoped Matrix
namespace Algebra
variable (b : Basis ι R S)
variable (R S)
noncomputable def trace : S →ₗ[R] R :=
(LinearMap.trace R S).comp (lmul R S).toLinearMap
#align algebra.trace Algebra.trace
variable {S}
-- Not a `simp` lemma since there are more interesting ways to rewrite `trace R S x`,
-- for example `trace_trace`
theorem trace_apply (x) : trace R S x = LinearMap.trace R S (lmul R S x) :=
rfl
#align algebra.trace_apply Algebra.trace_apply
theorem trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis (h : ¬∃ s : Finset S, Nonempty (Basis s R S)) :
trace R S = 0 := by ext s; simp [trace_apply, LinearMap.trace, h]
#align algebra.trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis Algebra.trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis
variable {R}
-- Can't be a `simp` lemma because it depends on a choice of basis
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R S) (s : S) :
trace R S s = Matrix.trace (Algebra.leftMulMatrix b s) := by
rw [trace_apply, LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace _ b, ← toMatrix_lmul_eq]; rfl
#align algebra.trace_eq_matrix_trace Algebra.trace_eq_matrix_trace
theorem trace_algebraMap_of_basis (x : R) : trace R S (algebraMap R S x) = Fintype.card ι • x := by
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [trace_apply, LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, Matrix.trace]
convert Finset.sum_const x
simp [-coe_lmul_eq_mul]
#align algebra.trace_algebra_map_of_basis Algebra.trace_algebraMap_of_basis
@[simp]
theorem trace_algebraMap (x : K) : trace K L (algebraMap K L x) = finrank K L • x := by
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset L, Nonempty (Basis s K L)
· rw [trace_algebraMap_of_basis H.choose_spec.some, finrank_eq_card_basis H.choose_spec.some]
· simp [trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis K H, finrank_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis_finset H]
#align algebra.trace_algebra_map Algebra.trace_algebraMap
theorem trace_trace_of_basis [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] {ι κ : Type*} [Finite ι]
[Finite κ] (b : Basis ι R S) (c : Basis κ S T) (x : T) :
trace R S (trace S T x) = trace R T x := by
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
haveI := Classical.decEq κ
cases nonempty_fintype ι
cases nonempty_fintype κ
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace (b.smul c), trace_eq_matrix_trace b, trace_eq_matrix_trace c,
Matrix.trace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.trace, ← Finset.univ_product_univ, Finset.sum_product]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ ?_
simp only [AlgHom.map_sum, smul_leftMulMatrix, Finset.sum_apply,
Matrix.diag, Finset.sum_apply
i (Finset.univ : Finset κ) fun y => leftMulMatrix b (leftMulMatrix c x y y)]
#align algebra.trace_trace_of_basis Algebra.trace_trace_of_basis
theorem trace_comp_trace_of_basis [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] {ι κ : Type*} [Finite ι]
[Finite κ] (b : Basis ι R S) (c : Basis κ S T) :
(trace R S).comp ((trace S T).restrictScalars R) = trace R T := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.restrictScalars_apply, trace_trace_of_basis b c]
#align algebra.trace_comp_trace_of_basis Algebra.trace_comp_trace_of_basis
@[simp]
theorem trace_trace [Algebra K T] [Algebra L T] [IsScalarTower K L T] [FiniteDimensional K L]
[FiniteDimensional L T] (x : T) : trace K L (trace L T x) = trace K T x :=
trace_trace_of_basis (Basis.ofVectorSpace K L) (Basis.ofVectorSpace L T) x
#align algebra.trace_trace Algebra.trace_trace
@[simp]
theorem trace_comp_trace [Algebra K T] [Algebra L T] [IsScalarTower K L T] [FiniteDimensional K L]
[FiniteDimensional L T] : (trace K L).comp ((trace L T).restrictScalars K) = trace K T := by
ext; rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.restrictScalars_apply, trace_trace]
#align algebra.trace_comp_trace Algebra.trace_comp_trace
@[simp]
theorem trace_prod_apply [Module.Free R S] [Module.Free R T] [Module.Finite R S] [Module.Finite R T]
(x : S × T) : trace R (S × T) x = trace R S x.fst + trace R T x.snd := by
nontriviality R
let f := (lmul R S).toLinearMap.prodMap (lmul R T).toLinearMap
have : (lmul R (S × T)).toLinearMap = (prodMapLinear R S T S T R).comp f :=
LinearMap.ext₂ Prod.mul_def
simp_rw [trace, this]
exact trace_prodMap' _ _
#align algebra.trace_prod_apply Algebra.trace_prod_apply
theorem trace_prod [Module.Free R S] [Module.Free R T] [Module.Finite R S] [Module.Finite R T] :
trace R (S × T) = (trace R S).coprod (trace R T) :=
LinearMap.ext fun p => by rw [coprod_apply, trace_prod_apply]
#align algebra.trace_prod Algebra.trace_prod
section EqSumRoots
open Algebra Polynomial
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable [Algebra K S] [Algebra K F]
theorem PowerBasis.trace_gen_eq_nextCoeff_minpoly [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis K S) :
Algebra.trace K S pb.gen = -(minpoly K pb.gen).nextCoeff := by
have d_pos : 0 < pb.dim := PowerBasis.dim_pos pb
have d_pos' : 0 < (minpoly K pb.gen).natDegree := by simpa
haveI : Nonempty (Fin pb.dim) := ⟨⟨0, d_pos⟩⟩
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace pb.basis, trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff, charpoly_leftMulMatrix, ←
pb.natDegree_minpoly, Fintype.card_fin, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos d_pos']
#align power_basis.trace_gen_eq_next_coeff_minpoly PowerBasis.trace_gen_eq_nextCoeff_minpoly
theorem PowerBasis.trace_gen_eq_sum_roots [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis K S)
(hf : (minpoly K pb.gen).Splits (algebraMap K F)) :
algebraMap K F (trace K S pb.gen) = ((minpoly K pb.gen).aroots F).sum := by
rw [PowerBasis.trace_gen_eq_nextCoeff_minpoly, RingHom.map_neg, ←
nextCoeff_map (algebraMap K F).injective,
sum_roots_eq_nextCoeff_of_monic_of_split ((minpoly.monic (PowerBasis.isIntegral_gen _)).map _)
((splits_id_iff_splits _).2 hf),
neg_neg]
#align power_basis.trace_gen_eq_sum_roots PowerBasis.trace_gen_eq_sum_roots
namespace IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple
open IntermediateField
theorem trace_gen_eq_zero {x : L} (hx : ¬IsIntegral K x) :
Algebra.trace K K⟮x⟯ (AdjoinSimple.gen K x) = 0 := by
rw [trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis, LinearMap.zero_apply]
contrapose! hx
obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := hx
refine .of_mem_of_fg K⟮x⟯.toSubalgebra ?_ x ?_
· exact (Submodule.fg_iff_finiteDimensional _).mpr (FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b)
· exact subset_adjoin K _ (Set.mem_singleton x)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.trace_gen_eq_zero IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.trace_gen_eq_zero
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Trace.lean | 262 | 271 | theorem trace_gen_eq_sum_roots (x : L) (hf : (minpoly K x).Splits (algebraMap K F)) :
algebraMap K F (trace K K⟮x⟯ (AdjoinSimple.gen K x)) =
((minpoly K x).aroots F).sum := by |
have injKxL := (algebraMap K⟮x⟯ L).injective
by_cases hx : IsIntegral K x; swap
· simp [minpoly.eq_zero hx, trace_gen_eq_zero hx, aroots_def]
rw [← adjoin.powerBasis_gen hx, (adjoin.powerBasis hx).trace_gen_eq_sum_roots] <;>
rw [adjoin.powerBasis_gen hx, ← minpoly.algebraMap_eq injKxL] <;>
try simp only [AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen _ _]
exact hf
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
#align_import algebra.big_operators.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
open Function
variable {ι α β M N G k R : Type*}
namespace Finset
theorem abs_sum_le_sum_abs {G : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup G] (f : ι → G) (s : Finset ι) :
|∑ i ∈ s, f i| ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, |f i| := le_sum_of_subadditive _ abs_zero abs_add s f
#align finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs
theorem abs_sum_of_nonneg {G : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup G] {f : ι → G} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) : |∑ i ∈ s, f i| = ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
#align finset.abs_sum_of_nonneg Finset.abs_sum_of_nonneg
theorem abs_sum_of_nonneg' {G : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup G] {f : ι → G} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : |∑ i ∈ s, f i| = ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg (Finset.sum_nonneg' hf)]
#align finset.abs_sum_of_nonneg' Finset.abs_sum_of_nonneg'
section DoubleCounting
variable [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {B : Finset (Finset α)} {n : ℕ}
theorem sum_card_inter_le (h : ∀ a ∈ s, (B.filter (a ∈ ·)).card ≤ n) :
(∑ t ∈ B, (s ∩ t).card) ≤ s.card * n := by
refine le_trans ?_ (s.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ h)
simp_rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, card_eq_sum_ones, sum_filter]
exact sum_comm.le
#align finset.sum_card_inter_le Finset.sum_card_inter_le
theorem sum_card_le [Fintype α] (h : ∀ a, (B.filter (a ∈ ·)).card ≤ n) :
∑ s ∈ B, s.card ≤ Fintype.card α * n :=
calc
∑ s ∈ B, s.card = ∑ s ∈ B, (univ ∩ s).card := by simp_rw [univ_inter]
_ ≤ Fintype.card α * n := sum_card_inter_le fun a _ ↦ h a
#align finset.sum_card_le Finset.sum_card_le
theorem le_sum_card_inter (h : ∀ a ∈ s, n ≤ (B.filter (a ∈ ·)).card) :
s.card * n ≤ ∑ t ∈ B, (s ∩ t).card := by
apply (s.card_nsmul_le_sum _ _ h).trans
simp_rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, card_eq_sum_ones, sum_filter]
exact sum_comm.le
#align finset.le_sum_card_inter Finset.le_sum_card_inter
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 344 | 348 | theorem le_sum_card [Fintype α] (h : ∀ a, n ≤ (B.filter (a ∈ ·)).card) :
Fintype.card α * n ≤ ∑ s ∈ B, s.card :=
calc
Fintype.card α * n ≤ ∑ s ∈ B, (univ ∩ s).card := le_sum_card_inter fun a _ ↦ h a
_ = ∑ s ∈ B, s.card := by | simp_rw [univ_inter]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import combinatorics.composition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
blocks : List ℕ
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
#align composition Composition
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
#align composition_as_set CompositionAsSet
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
#align composition.length Composition.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
#align composition.blocks_length Composition.blocks_length
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
#align composition.blocks_fun Composition.blocksFun
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
#align composition.of_fn_blocks_fun Composition.ofFn_blocksFun
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
#align composition.sum_blocks_fun Composition.sum_blocksFun
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _ _
#align composition.blocks_fun_mem_blocks Composition.blocksFun_mem_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
#align composition.one_le_blocks Composition.one_le_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) i h)
#align composition.one_le_blocks' Composition.one_le_blocks'
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
#align composition.blocks_pos' Composition.blocks_pos'
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
#align composition.one_le_blocks_fun Composition.one_le_blocksFun
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
#align composition.length_le Composition.length_le
theorem length_pos_of_pos (h : 0 < n) : 0 < c.length := by
apply length_pos_of_sum_pos
convert h
exact c.blocks_sum
#align composition.length_pos_of_pos Composition.length_pos_of_pos
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
#align composition.size_up_to Composition.sizeUpTo
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
#align composition.size_up_to_zero Composition.sizeUpTo_zero
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_all_of_le h
#align composition.size_up_to_of_length_le Composition.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
#align composition.size_up_to_length Composition.sizeUpTo_length
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align composition.size_up_to_le Composition.sizeUpTo_le
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
#align composition.size_up_to_succ Composition.sizeUpTo_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
#align composition.size_up_to_succ' Composition.sizeUpTo_succ'
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
#align composition.size_up_to_strict_mono Composition.sizeUpTo_strict_mono
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
#align composition.monotone_size_up_to Composition.monotone_sizeUpTo
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
#align composition.boundary Composition.boundary
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_zero Composition.boundary_zero
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_last Composition.boundary_last
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
#align composition.boundaries Composition.boundaries
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
#align composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length Composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
#align composition.to_composition_as_set Composition.toCompositionAsSet
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align composition.order_emb_of_fin_boundaries Composition.orderEmbOfFin_boundaries
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ _).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
#align composition.embedding Composition.embedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_embedding Composition.coe_embedding
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
#align composition.index_exists Composition.index_exists
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
#align composition.index Composition.index
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
#align composition.lt_size_up_to_index_succ Composition.lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
#align composition.size_up_to_index_le Composition.sizeUpTo_index_le
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
#align composition.inv_embedding Composition.invEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_inv_embedding Composition.coe_invEmbedding
theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
#align composition.embedding_comp_inv Composition.embedding_comp_inv
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ c.sizeUpTo i ≤ j ∧ (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i : ℕ).succ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases Set.mem_range.2 h with ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [Fin.ext_iff] at hk
dsimp at hk
rw [← hk]
simp [sizeUpTo_succ', k.is_lt]
· intro h
apply Set.mem_range.2
refine ⟨⟨j - c.sizeUpTo i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_iff_left, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact h.2
· exact h.1
· rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact add_tsub_cancel_of_le h.1
#align composition.mem_range_embedding_iff Composition.mem_range_embedding_iff
theorem disjoint_range {i₁ i₂ : Fin c.length} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
Disjoint (Set.range (c.embedding i₁)) (Set.range (c.embedding i₂)) := by
classical
wlog h' : i₁ < i₂
· exact (this c h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h')).symm
by_contra d
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ :
∃ x : Fin n, x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₁) ∧ x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₂) :=
Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 d
have A : (i₁ : ℕ).succ ≤ i₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h'
apply lt_irrefl (x : ℕ)
calc
(x : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i₁ : ℕ).succ := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₁).2
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo (i₂ : ℕ) := monotone_sum_take _ A
_ ≤ x := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₂).1
#align composition.disjoint_range Composition.disjoint_range
theorem mem_range_embedding (j : Fin n) : j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) := by
have : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) :=
Set.mem_range_self _
rwa [c.embedding_comp_inv j] at this
#align composition.mem_range_embedding Composition.mem_range_embedding
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff' {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ i = c.index j := by
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not]
intro h
exact Set.disjoint_right.1 (c.disjoint_range h) (c.mem_range_embedding j)
· intro h
rw [h]
exact c.mem_range_embedding j
#align composition.mem_range_embedding_iff' Composition.mem_range_embedding_iff'
theorem index_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
c.index (c.embedding i j) = i := by
symm
rw [← mem_range_embedding_iff']
apply Set.mem_range_self
#align composition.index_embedding Composition.index_embedding
theorem invEmbedding_comp (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.invEmbedding (c.embedding i j) : ℕ) = j := by
simp_rw [coe_invEmbedding, index_embedding, coe_embedding, add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align composition.inv_embedding_comp Composition.invEmbedding_comp
def blocksFinEquiv : (Σi : Fin c.length, Fin (c.blocksFun i)) ≃ Fin n where
toFun x := c.embedding x.1 x.2
invFun j := ⟨c.index j, c.invEmbedding j⟩
left_inv x := by
rcases x with ⟨i, y⟩
dsimp
congr; · exact c.index_embedding _ _
rw [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
· exact c.invEmbedding_comp _ _
· rw [c.index_embedding]
right_inv j := c.embedding_comp_inv j
#align composition.blocks_fin_equiv Composition.blocksFinEquiv
theorem blocksFun_congr {n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (c₁ : Composition n₁) (c₂ : Composition n₂) (i₁ : Fin c₁.length)
(i₂ : Fin c₂.length) (hn : n₁ = n₂) (hc : c₁.blocks = c₂.blocks) (hi : (i₁ : ℕ) = i₂) :
c₁.blocksFun i₁ = c₂.blocksFun i₂ := by
cases hn
rw [← Composition.ext_iff] at hc
cases hc
congr
rwa [Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.blocks_fun_congr Composition.blocksFun_congr
theorem sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq {c : Σn, Composition n} {c' : Σn, Composition n} :
c = c' ↔ c.2.blocks = c'.2.blocks := by
refine ⟨fun H => by rw [H], fun H => ?_⟩
rcases c with ⟨n, c⟩
rcases c' with ⟨n', c'⟩
have : n = n' := by rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← c'.blocks_sum, H]
induction this
congr
ext1
exact H
#align composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq Composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq
def ones (n : ℕ) : Composition n :=
⟨replicate n (1 : ℕ), fun {i} hi => by simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hi], by simp⟩
#align composition.ones Composition.ones
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (Composition n) :=
⟨Composition.ones n⟩
@[simp]
theorem ones_length (n : ℕ) : (ones n).length = n :=
List.length_replicate n 1
#align composition.ones_length Composition.ones_length
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocks (n : ℕ) : (ones n).blocks = replicate n (1 : ℕ) :=
rfl
#align composition.ones_blocks Composition.ones_blocks
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocksFun (n : ℕ) (i : Fin (ones n).length) : (ones n).blocksFun i = 1 := by
simp only [blocksFun, ones, blocks, i.2, List.get_replicate]
#align composition.ones_blocks_fun Composition.ones_blocksFun
@[simp]
theorem ones_sizeUpTo (n : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : (ones n).sizeUpTo i = min i n := by
simp [sizeUpTo, ones_blocks, take_replicate]
#align composition.ones_size_up_to Composition.ones_sizeUpTo
@[simp]
theorem ones_embedding (i : Fin (ones n).length) (h : 0 < (ones n).blocksFun i) :
(ones n).embedding i ⟨0, h⟩ = ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (ones n).length_le⟩ := by
ext
simpa using i.2.le
#align composition.ones_embedding Composition.ones_embedding
theorem eq_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ ∀ i ∈ c.blocks, i = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact fun i => eq_of_mem_replicate
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks = replicate c.blocks.length 1 := eq_replicate_of_mem H
have : c.blocks.length = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, A]
simp
rw [A, this, ones_blocks]
#align composition.eq_ones_iff Composition.eq_ones_iff
theorem ne_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c ≠ ones n ↔ ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := by
refine (not_congr eq_ones_iff).trans ?_
have : ∀ j ∈ c.blocks, j = 1 ↔ j ≤ 1 := fun j hj => by simp [le_antisymm_iff, c.one_le_blocks hj]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [this]
#align composition.ne_ones_iff Composition.ne_ones_iff
theorem eq_ones_iff_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ c.length = n := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ones_length n
· contrapose
intro H length_n
apply lt_irrefl n
calc
n = ∑ i : Fin c.length, 1 := by simp [length_n]
_ < ∑ i : Fin c.length, c.blocksFun i := by
{
obtain ⟨i, hi, i_blocks⟩ : ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := ne_ones_iff.1 H
rw [← ofFn_blocksFun, mem_ofFn c.blocksFun, Set.mem_range] at hi
obtain ⟨j : Fin c.length, hj : c.blocksFun j = i⟩ := hi
rw [← hj] at i_blocks
exact Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => one_le_blocksFun c i) ⟨j, Finset.mem_univ _, i_blocks⟩
}
_ = n := c.sum_blocksFun
#align composition.eq_ones_iff_length Composition.eq_ones_iff_length
theorem eq_ones_iff_le_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ n ≤ c.length := by
simp [eq_ones_iff_length, le_antisymm_iff, c.length_le]
#align composition.eq_ones_iff_le_length Composition.eq_ones_iff_le_length
def single (n : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) : Composition n :=
⟨[n], by simp [h], by simp⟩
#align composition.single Composition.single
@[simp]
theorem single_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).length = 1 :=
rfl
#align composition.single_length Composition.single_length
@[simp]
theorem single_blocks {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).blocks = [n] :=
rfl
#align composition.single_blocks Composition.single_blocks
@[simp]
theorem single_blocksFun {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin (single n h).length) :
(single n h).blocksFun i = n := by simp [blocksFun, single, blocks, i.2]
#align composition.single_blocks_fun Composition.single_blocksFun
@[simp]
theorem single_embedding {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin n) :
((single n h).embedding (0 : Fin 1)) i = i := by
ext
simp
#align composition.single_embedding Composition.single_embedding
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 577 | 588 | theorem eq_single_iff_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c = single n h ↔ c.length = 1 := by |
constructor
· intro H
rw [H]
exact single_length h
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks.length = 1 := H ▸ c.blocks_length
have B : c.blocks.sum = n := c.blocks_sum
rw [eq_cons_of_length_one A] at B ⊢
simpa [single_blocks] using B
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le'
theorem lintegral_sub_le (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub_le' f g hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h : ∃ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ g x) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, Ne, Classical.not_not]
exact ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le h_le hfi hg h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) {s : Set α} (hμs : μ s ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt hg hfi h_le <|
((frequently_ae_mem_iff.2 hμs).and_eventually h).mono fun _x hx => (hx.2 hx.1).ne
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on
theorem lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
rw [Ne, ← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
refine lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on hg hfi (ae_le_of_ae_lt h) hμ ?_
simpa using h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono
theorem set_lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ 0) (hg : Measurable g) (hfi : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono (by simp [hs]) hg.aemeasurable hfi ((ae_restrict_iff' hsm).mpr h)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_strict_mono
theorem lintegral_iInf_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ ≤ᵐ[μ] f n) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
have fn_le_f0 : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
have fn_le_f0' : ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ := iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
(ENNReal.sub_right_inj h_fin fn_le_f0 fn_le_f0').1 <|
show ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ from
calc
∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_sub (measurable_iInf h_meas)
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun a => iInf_le _ _)).symm
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ := congr rfl (funext fun a => ENNReal.sub_iInf)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup_ae (fun n => (h_meas 0).sub (h_meas n)) fun n =>
(h_mono n).mono fun a ha => tsub_le_tsub le_rfl ha)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
(have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ a ≤ f n a := ae_all_iff.2 h_mono
have h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f 0 a := fun n =>
h_mono.mono fun a h => by
induction' n with n ih
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans (h n) ih
congr_arg iSup <|
funext fun n =>
lintegral_sub (h_meas _) (ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono_ae <| h_mono n)
(h_mono n))
_ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := ENNReal.sub_iInf.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_ae
theorem lintegral_iInf {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_anti : Antitone f)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iInf_ae h_meas (fun n => ae_of_all _ <| h_anti n.le_succ) h_fin
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf
theorem lintegral_iInf' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_anti : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a)) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iInf_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Antitone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_anti
have h_ae_seq_mono : Antitone (aeSeq h_meas p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet h_meas p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet h_meas hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iInf h_meas hp).symm]
simp_rw [iInf_apply]
rw [lintegral_iInf (aeSeq.measurable h_meas p) h_ae_seq_mono]
· congr
exact funext fun n ↦ lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp n)
· rwa [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp 0)]
theorem lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [Countable β]
{f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b))
(hf_int : ∀ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_directed : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp only [iInf_of_empty, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.top_mul (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.mpr hμ)]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨅ b, f b a = ⨅ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
refine fun a =>
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun n => iInf_le _ _)
(le_iInf fun b => iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) ?_)
exact h_directed.sequence_le b a
-- Porting note: used `∘` below to deal with its reduced reducibility
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by simp only [this, Function.comp_apply]
_ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_iInf ?_ h_directed.sequence_anti]
· exact hf_int _
· exact fun n => hf _
_ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun b => ?_) (le_iInf fun n => ?_)
· exact iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.sequence_le b)
· exact iInf_le (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
#align lintegral_infi_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_liminf_le' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
calc
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat]
_ = ⨆ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup' (fun n => aemeasurable_biInf _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ h_meas i))
(ae_of_all μ fun a n m hnm => iInf_le_iInf_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi))
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := iSup_mono fun n => le_iInf₂_lintegral _
_ = atTop.liminf fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le'
theorem lintegral_liminf_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
lintegral_liminf_le' fun n => (h_meas n).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le
theorem limsup_lintegral_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_bound : ∀ n, f n ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ :=
calc
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
_ ≤ ⨅ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := iInf_mono fun n => iSup₂_lintegral_le _
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
refine (lintegral_iInf ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro n
exact measurable_biSup _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ hf_meas i)
· intro n m hnm a
exact iSup_le_iSup_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi
· refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin (lintegral_mono_ae ?_)
refine (ae_all_iff.2 h_bound).mono fun n hn => ?_
exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => hn i
_ = ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ := by simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat]
#align measure_theory.limsup_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.limsup_lintegral_le
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) :=
tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
(calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n : ℕ => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.liminf_eq.symm
_ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop := lintegral_liminf_le hF_meas
)
(calc
limsup (fun n : ℕ => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
limsup_lintegral_le hF_meas h_bound h_fin
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.limsup_eq
)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) := by
have : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a ∂μ := fun n =>
lintegral_congr_ae (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk
simp_rw [this]
apply
tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence bound (fun n => (hF_meas n).measurable_mk) _ h_fin
· have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := fun n => (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk.symm
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := ae_all_iff.mpr this
filter_upwards [this, h_lim] with a H H'
simp_rw [H]
exact H'
· intro n
filter_upwards [h_bound n, (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk] with a H H'
rwa [H'] at H
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence'
theorem tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {F : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (bound : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, F n a ≤ bound a)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl := by
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
exact xl
have h := inter_mem hF_meas h_bound
replace h := hxl _ h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact bound
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).1
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).2
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· assumption
· refine h_lim.mono fun a h_lim => ?_
apply @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) fun n => F n a
· assumption
rw [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
assumption
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_anti : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h0 : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
have : Antitone fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij ↦
lintegral_mono_ae (h_anti.mono fun x hx ↦ hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf this
rw [← lintegral_iInf' hf h_anti h0]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_anti, h_tendsto] with _ hx_anti hx_tendsto
using tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iInf hx_anti)
section
open Encodable
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b)) (h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp [iSup_of_empty]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨆ b, f b a = ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
intro a
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun b => ?_) (iSup_le fun n => le_iSup (fun n => f n a) _)
exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (h_directed.le_sequence b a)
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ := by simp only [this]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => hf _) h_directed.sequence_mono)
_ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun b => ?_)
· exact le_iSup (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
· exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.le_sequence b)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b, AEMeasurable (f b) μ)
(h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (β → ENNReal) → Prop := fun x f' => Directed LE.le f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := by
filter_upwards [] with x i j
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed i j
exact ⟨z, hz₁ x, hz₂ x⟩
have h_ae_seq_directed : Directed LE.le (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro b₁ b₂
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed b₁ b₂
refine ⟨z, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· repeat rw [aeSeq.aeSeq_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx]
apply_rules [hz₁, hz₂]
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
convert lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_directed using 1
· simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
· congr 1
ext1 b
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
apply EventuallyEq.symm
exact aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed
end
theorem lintegral_tsum [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑' i, f i a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [lintegral_iSup_directed]
· simp [lintegral_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => hf i]
· intro b
exact Finset.aemeasurable_sum _ fun i _ => hf i
· intro s t
use s ∪ t
constructor
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_left
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tsum MeasureTheory.lintegral_tsum
open Measure
theorem lintegral_iUnion₀ [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_iUnion_ae hd hm, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion₀
theorem lintegral_iUnion [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iUnion₀ (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion₀ {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : t.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, lintegral_iUnion₀ (SetCoe.forall'.1 hm) (hd.subtype _ _)]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, MeasurableSet (s i)) (hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion₀ ht (fun i hi => (hm i hi).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on t)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t b) μ)
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [← Finset.mem_coe, lintegral_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hm hd, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} (hd : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t b)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint (fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet) f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset
theorem lintegral_iUnion_le [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ ≤ ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_sum_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' restrict_iUnion_le le_rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion_le
theorem lintegral_union {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {A B : Set α} (hB : MeasurableSet B) (hAB : Disjoint A B) :
∫⁻ a in A ∪ B, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in A, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in B, f a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union hAB hB, lintegral_add_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_union MeasureTheory.lintegral_union
theorem lintegral_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s ∪ t, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' (restrict_union_le _ _) le_rfl
theorem lintegral_inter_add_diff {B : Set α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (A : Set α) (hB : MeasurableSet B) :
∫⁻ x in A ∩ B, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in A \ B, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, restrict_inter_add_diff _ hB]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.lintegral_inter_add_diff
theorem lintegral_add_compl (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {A : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in Aᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, Measure.restrict_add_restrict_compl hA]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_compl MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_compl
theorem lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ x, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
have hm : MeasurableSet { x | f x ≤ g x } := measurableSet_le hf hg
rw [← lintegral_add_compl (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) hm]
simp only [← compl_setOf, ← not_le]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm ?_) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm.compl ?_)
exacts [ae_of_all _ fun x => max_eq_right (a := f x) (b := g x),
ae_of_all _ fun x (hx : ¬ f x ≤ g x) => max_eq_left (not_le.1 hx).le]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_max MeasureTheory.lintegral_max
theorem set_lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in s, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_max hf hg, restrict_restrict, restrict_restrict, inter_comm s, inter_comm s]
exacts [measurableSet_lt hg hf, measurableSet_le hf hg]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_max MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_max
theorem lintegral_map {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
erw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral (hf.comp hg)]
congr with n : 1
convert SimpleFunc.lintegral_map _ hg
ext1 x; simp only [eapprox_comp hf hg, coe_comp]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map MeasureTheory.lintegral_map
theorem lintegral_map' {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f (Measure.map g μ)) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂Measure.map g μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂Measure.map (hg.mk g) μ := by
congr 1
exact Measure.map_congr hg.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f (hg.mk g a) ∂μ := lintegral_map hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f (g a) ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| hg.ae_eq_mk.symm.fun_comp _
_ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae (ae_eq_comp hg hf.ae_eq_mk.symm)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map' MeasureTheory.lintegral_map'
theorem lintegral_map_le {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup_le fun h'i => ?_
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (i ∘ g) (hi.comp hg) ?_
exact le_iSup_of_le (fun x => h'i (g x)) (le_of_eq (lintegral_map hi hg))
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_map_le
theorem lintegral_comp [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : lintegral μ (f ∘ g) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ :=
(lintegral_map hf hg).symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_comp MeasureTheory.lintegral_comp
theorem set_lintegral_map [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ y in s, f y ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ x in g ⁻¹' s, f (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_map hg hs, lintegral_map hf hg]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_map MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_map
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_comp {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) (f a) ∂μ = c * μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
erw [lintegral_comp (measurable_const.indicator hs) hf, lintegral_indicator_const hs,
Measure.map_apply hf hs]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const_comp MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const_comp
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.lintegral_map [MeasurableSpace β] {g : α → β}
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun f₀ hf₀ => ?_) (iSup₂_le fun f₀ hf₀ => ?_)
· rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_map _ hg.measurable]
have : (f₀.comp g hg.measurable : α → ℝ≥0∞) ≤ f ∘ g := fun x => hf₀ (g x)
exact le_iSup_of_le (comp f₀ g hg.measurable) (by exact le_iSup (α := ℝ≥0∞) _ this)
· rw [← f₀.extend_comp_eq hg (const _ 0), ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_map, ←
SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, ← lintegral]
refine lintegral_mono_ae (hg.ae_map_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
exact (extend_apply _ _ _ _).trans_le (hf₀ _)
#align measurable_embedding.lintegral_map MeasurableEmbedding.lintegral_map
theorem lintegral_map_equiv [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : α ≃ᵐ β) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ :=
g.measurableEmbedding.lintegral_map f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map_equiv MeasureTheory.lintegral_map_equiv
protected theorem MeasurePreserving.lintegral_map_equiv [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β}
(f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : α ≃ᵐ β) (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ ν) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
rw [← MeasureTheory.lintegral_map_equiv f g, hg.map_eq]
theorem MeasurePreserving.lintegral_comp {mb : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β} {g : α → β}
(hg : MeasurePreserving g μ ν) {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂ν := by rw [← hg.map_eq, lintegral_map hf hg.measurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.lintegral_comp MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.lintegral_comp
theorem MeasurePreserving.lintegral_comp_emb {mb : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β} {g : α → β}
(hg : MeasurePreserving g μ ν) (hge : MeasurableEmbedding g) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂ν := by rw [← hg.map_eq, hge.lintegral_map]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.lintegral_comp_emb MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.lintegral_comp_emb
theorem MeasurePreserving.set_lintegral_comp_preimage {mb : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β}
{g : α → β} (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ ν) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a in g ⁻¹' s, f (g a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂ν := by
rw [← hg.map_eq, set_lintegral_map hs hf hg.measurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.set_lintegral_comp_preimage MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.set_lintegral_comp_preimage
theorem MeasurePreserving.set_lintegral_comp_preimage_emb {mb : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β}
{g : α → β} (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ ν) (hge : MeasurableEmbedding g) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞)
(s : Set β) : ∫⁻ a in g ⁻¹' s, f (g a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂ν := by
rw [← hg.map_eq, hge.restrict_map, hge.lintegral_map]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.set_lintegral_comp_preimage_emb MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.set_lintegral_comp_preimage_emb
theorem MeasurePreserving.set_lintegral_comp_emb {mb : MeasurableSpace β} {ν : Measure β}
{g : α → β} (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ ν) (hge : MeasurableEmbedding g) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞)
(s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a in s, f (g a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ b in g '' s, f b ∂ν := by
rw [← hg.set_lintegral_comp_preimage_emb hge, preimage_image_eq _ hge.injective]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.set_lintegral_comp_emb MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.set_lintegral_comp_emb
theorem lintegral_subtype_comap {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x : s, f x ∂(μ.comap (↑)) = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).lintegral_map, map_comap_subtype_coe hs]
theorem set_lintegral_subtype {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂(μ.comap (↑)) = ∫⁻ x in (↑) '' t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).restrict_comap, lintegral_subtype_comap hs,
restrict_restrict hs, inter_eq_right.2 (Subtype.coe_image_subset _ _)]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,629 | 1,639 | theorem ae_lt_top {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (h2f : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞ := by |
simp_rw [ae_iff, ENNReal.not_lt_top]
by_contra h
apply h2f.lt_top.not_le
have : (f ⁻¹' {∞}).indicator ⊤ ≤ f := by
intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ f ⁻¹' {∞} <;> [simpa [indicator_of_mem hx]; simp [indicator_of_not_mem hx]]
convert lintegral_mono this
rw [lintegral_indicator _ (hf (measurableSet_singleton ∞))]
simp [ENNReal.top_mul', preimage, h]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Bitwise
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.zpow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"03fda9112aa6708947da13944a19310684bfdfcb"
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {n' : Type*} [DecidableEq n'] [Fintype n'] {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
local notation "M" => Matrix n' n' R
noncomputable instance : DivInvMonoid M :=
{ show Monoid M by infer_instance, show Inv M by infer_instance with }
section ZPow
open Int
@[simp]
theorem one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : M) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| -[n+1] => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
#align matrix.one_zpow Matrix.one_zpow
theorem zero_zpow : ∀ z : ℤ, z ≠ 0 → (0 : M) ^ z = 0
| (n : ℕ), h => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zero_pow]
exact mod_cast h
| -[n+1], _ => by simp [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero]
#align matrix.zero_zpow Matrix.zero_zpow
theorem zero_zpow_eq (n : ℤ) : (0 : M) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, zpow_zero]
· rw [zero_zpow _ h]
#align matrix.zero_zpow_eq Matrix.zero_zpow_eq
theorem inv_zpow (A : M) : ∀ n : ℤ, A⁻¹ ^ n = (A ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow']
| -[n+1] => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow']
#align matrix.inv_zpow Matrix.inv_zpow
@[simp]
theorem zpow_neg_one (A : M) : A ^ (-1 : ℤ) = A⁻¹ := by
convert DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' 0 A
simp only [zpow_one, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zpow_eq_pow, zero_add]
#align matrix.zpow_neg_one Matrix.zpow_neg_one
#align matrix.zpow_coe_nat zpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem zpow_neg_natCast (A : M) (n : ℕ) : A ^ (-n : ℤ) = (A ^ n)⁻¹ := by
cases n
· simp
· exact DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
#align matrix.zpow_neg_coe_nat Matrix.zpow_neg_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias zpow_neg_coe_nat := zpow_neg_natCast
theorem _root_.IsUnit.det_zpow {A : M} (h : IsUnit A.det) (n : ℤ) : IsUnit (A ^ n).det := by
cases' n with n n
· simpa using h.pow n
· simpa using h.pow n.succ
#align is_unit.det_zpow IsUnit.det_zpow
theorem isUnit_det_zpow_iff {A : M} {z : ℤ} : IsUnit (A ^ z).det ↔ IsUnit A.det ∨ z = 0 := by
induction' z using Int.induction_on with z _ z _
· simp
· rw [← Int.ofNat_succ, zpow_natCast, det_pow, isUnit_pow_succ_iff, ← Int.ofNat_zero,
Int.ofNat_inj]
simp
· rw [← neg_add', ← Int.ofNat_succ, zpow_neg_natCast, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, det_pow,
isUnit_pow_succ_iff, neg_eq_zero, ← Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_inj]
simp
#align matrix.is_unit_det_zpow_iff Matrix.isUnit_det_zpow_iff
theorem zpow_neg {A : M} (h : IsUnit A.det) : ∀ n : ℤ, A ^ (-n) = (A ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => zpow_neg_natCast _ _
| -[n+1] => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, neg_negSucc, zpow_natCast, nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv]
rw [det_pow]
exact h.pow _
#align matrix.zpow_neg Matrix.zpow_neg
theorem inv_zpow' {A : M} (h : IsUnit A.det) (n : ℤ) : A⁻¹ ^ n = A ^ (-n) := by
rw [zpow_neg h, inv_zpow]
#align matrix.inv_zpow' Matrix.inv_zpow'
theorem zpow_add_one {A : M} (h : IsUnit A.det) : ∀ n : ℤ, A ^ (n + 1) = A ^ n * A
| (n : ℕ) => by simp only [← Nat.cast_succ, pow_succ, zpow_natCast]
| -[n+1] =>
calc
A ^ (-(n + 1) + 1 : ℤ) = (A ^ n)⁻¹ := by
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right, zpow_neg h, zpow_natCast]
_ = (A * A ^ n)⁻¹ * A := by
rw [mul_inv_rev, Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul _ h, Matrix.mul_one]
_ = A ^ (-(n + 1 : ℤ)) * A := by
rw [zpow_neg h, ← Int.ofNat_succ, zpow_natCast, pow_succ']
#align matrix.zpow_add_one Matrix.zpow_add_one
theorem zpow_sub_one {A : M} (h : IsUnit A.det) (n : ℤ) : A ^ (n - 1) = A ^ n * A⁻¹ :=
calc
A ^ (n - 1) = A ^ (n - 1) * A * A⁻¹ := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv _ h, mul_one]
_ = A ^ n * A⁻¹ := by rw [← zpow_add_one h, sub_add_cancel]
#align matrix.zpow_sub_one Matrix.zpow_sub_one
theorem zpow_add {A : M} (ha : IsUnit A.det) (m n : ℤ) : A ^ (m + n) = A ^ m * A ^ n := by
induction n using Int.induction_on with
| hz => simp
| hp n ihn => simp only [← add_assoc, zpow_add_one ha, ihn, mul_assoc]
| hn n ihn => rw [zpow_sub_one ha, ← mul_assoc, ← ihn, ← zpow_sub_one ha, add_sub_assoc]
#align matrix.zpow_add Matrix.zpow_add
theorem zpow_add_of_nonpos {A : M} {m n : ℤ} (hm : m ≤ 0) (hn : n ≤ 0) :
A ^ (m + n) = A ^ m * A ^ n := by
rcases nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero A with (⟨h, _⟩ | h)
· exact zpow_add (isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h) m n
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_neg_ofNat hm
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_neg_ofNat hn
simp_rw [← neg_add, ← Int.ofNat_add, zpow_neg_natCast, ← inv_pow', h, pow_add]
#align matrix.zpow_add_of_nonpos Matrix.zpow_add_of_nonpos
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ZPow.lean | 184 | 188 | theorem zpow_add_of_nonneg {A : M} {m n : ℤ} (hm : 0 ≤ m) (hn : 0 ≤ n) :
A ^ (m + n) = A ^ m * A ^ n := by |
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le hm
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le hn
rw [← Int.ofNat_add, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, pow_add]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
theorem dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (p1 p2 p3 : P) :
dist p1 p3 * dist p1 p3 = dist p1 p2 * dist p1 p2 + dist p3 p2 * dist p3 p2 ↔
∠ p1 p2 p3 = π / 2 := by
erw [dist_comm p3 p2, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 p3, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 p2,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p2 p3, ← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p1, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p2 p3, norm_neg]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arccos (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arcsin (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, @ne_comm _ p₃, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ p₂, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₃ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arctan (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂) := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_pos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂) : 0 < ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, eq_comm, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃, add_comm]
exact angle_add_pos_of_inner_eq_zero h h0
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_pos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_pos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_le_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃, add_comm]
exact angle_add_le_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_le_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_le_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_lt_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₃ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ < π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V] at h0
rw [angle, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃, add_comm]
exact angle_add_lt_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero h h0
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_lt_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_lt_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.cos (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : Real.sin (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, @ne_comm _ p₃, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ p₂, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.tan (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
#align euclidean_geometry.tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.cos (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h]
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.sin (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h]
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : Real.tan (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₃ p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
#align euclidean_geometry.tan_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.tan_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/RightAngle.lean | 487 | 493 | theorem dist_div_cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : dist p₃ p₂ / Real.cos (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₃ := by |
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Quotient
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Floor
#align_import measure_theory.integral.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
open Set Function MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace AddSubgroup intervalIntegral
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
@[measurability]
protected theorem AddCircle.measurable_mk' {a : ℝ} :
Measurable (β := AddCircle a) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle a) :=
Continuous.measurable <| AddCircle.continuous_mk' a
#align add_circle.measurable_mk' AddCircle.measurable_mk'
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ)
(μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine this.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa only [add_comm x] using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine (AddSubgroup.equivOp _).bijective.comp this |>.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc' isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc'
namespace AddCircle
variable (T : ℝ) [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
noncomputable instance measureSpace : MeasureSpace (AddCircle T) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.measurableSpace _ with volume := ENNReal.ofReal T • addHaarMeasure ⊤ }
#align add_circle.measure_space AddCircle.measureSpace
#adaptation_note
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T := by
dsimp [volume]
rw [← PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
simp [addHaarMeasure_self (G := AddCircle T), -PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
#align add_circle.measure_univ AddCircle.measure_univ
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) :=
IsAddHaarMeasure.smul _ (by simp [hT.out]) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
instance isFiniteMeasure : IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by simp
#align add_circle.is_finite_measure AddCircle.isFiniteMeasure
instance : HasAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) ℝ where
ExistsIsAddFundamentalDomain := ⟨Ioc 0 (0 + T), isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' Fact.out 0⟩
instance : AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage volume (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
apply MeasureTheory.leftInvariantIsAddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
simp [(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out 0).covolume_eq_volume, AddCircle.measure_univ]
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := AddCircle T) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
measurePreserving_quotientAddGroup_mk_of_AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
volume (𝓕 := Ioc t (t+T)) (isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _) _
#align add_circle.measure_preserving_mk AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
lemma add_projection_respects_measure (t : ℝ) {U : Set (AddCircle T)} (meas_U : MeasurableSet U) :
volume U = volume (QuotientAddGroup.mk ⁻¹' U ∩ (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _).addProjection_respects_measure_apply
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) meas_U
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Periodic.lean | 107 | 124 | theorem volume_closedBall {x : AddCircle T} (ε : ℝ) :
volume (Metric.closedBall x ε) = ENNReal.ofReal (min T (2 * ε)) := by |
have hT' : |T| = T := abs_eq_self.mpr hT.out.le
let I := Ioc (-(T / 2)) (T / 2)
have h₁ : ε < T / 2 → Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε ∩ I = Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε := by
intro hε
rw [inter_eq_left, Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_sub, zero_add]
rintro y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; constructor <;> linarith
have h₂ : (↑) ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (0 : AddCircle T) ε ∩ I =
if ε < T / 2 then Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε else I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← if_ctx_congr (Iff.rfl : ε < T / 2 ↔ ε < T / 2) h₁ fun _ => rfl, ← hT']
apply coe_real_preimage_closedBall_inter_eq
simpa only [hT', Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_add, zero_sub] using Ioc_subset_Icc_self
rw [addHaar_closedBall_center, add_projection_respects_measure T (-(T/2))
measurableSet_closedBall, (by linarith : -(T / 2) + T = T / 2), h₂]
by_cases hε : ε < T / 2
· simp [hε, min_eq_right (by linarith : 2 * ε ≤ T)]
· simp [I, hε, min_eq_left (by linarith : T ≤ 2 * ε)]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun.DomAct
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped ENNReal
namespace DomMulAct
variable {M N α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace N]
[MeasurableSpace α] [NormedAddCommGroup E] {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section SMul
variable [SMul M α] [SMulInvariantMeasure M α μ] [MeasurableSMul M α]
@[to_additive]
instance : SMul Mᵈᵐᵃ (Lp E p μ) where
smul c f := Lp.compMeasurePreserving (mk.symm c • ·) (measurePreserving_smul _ _) f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_Lp_val (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (f : Lp E p μ) : (c • f).1 = c • f.1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_Lp_ae_eq (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • f =ᵐ[μ] (f <| mk.symm c • ·) :=
Lp.coeFn_compMeasurePreserving _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_smul_toLp (c : M) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
mk c • hf.toLp f =
(hf.comp_measurePreserving <| measurePreserving_smul c μ).toLp (f <| c • ·) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_Lp_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (a : E) :
c • Lp.const p μ a = Lp.const p μ a :=
rfl
instance [SMul N α] [SMulCommClass M N α] [SMulInvariantMeasure N α μ] [MeasurableSMul N α] :
SMulCommClass Mᵈᵐᵃ Nᵈᵐᵃ (Lp E p μ) :=
Subtype.val_injective.smulCommClass (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] : SMulCommClass Mᵈᵐᵃ 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
Subtype.val_injective.smulCommClass (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 Mᵈᵐᵃ (Lp E p μ) :=
.symm _ _ _
-- We don't have a typeclass for additive versions of the next few lemmas
-- Should we add `AddDistribAddAction` with `to_additive` both from `MulDistribMulAction`
-- and `DistribMulAction`?
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_Lp_add (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) : ∀ f g : Lp E p μ, c • (f + g) = c • f + c • g := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩; rfl
attribute [simp] DomAddAct.vadd_Lp_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
theorem smul_Lp_zero (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) : c • (0 : Lp E p μ) = 0 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_Lp_neg (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • (-f) = -(c • f) := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSpace/DomAct/Basic.lean | 82 | 83 | theorem smul_Lp_sub (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) : ∀ f g : Lp E p μ, c • (f - g) = c • f - c • g := by |
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
#align_import set_theory.game.pgame from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8900d545017cd21961daa2a1734bb658ef52c618"
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace SetTheory
open Function Relation
-- We'd like to be able to use multi-character auto-implicits in this file.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
inductive PGame : Type (u + 1)
| mk : ∀ α β : Type u, (α → PGame) → (β → PGame) → PGame
#align pgame SetTheory.PGame
compile_inductive% PGame
namespace PGame
def LeftMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk l _ _ _ => l
#align pgame.left_moves SetTheory.PGame.LeftMoves
def RightMoves : PGame → Type u
| mk _ r _ _ => r
#align pgame.right_moves SetTheory.PGame.RightMoves
def moveLeft : ∀ g : PGame, LeftMoves g → PGame
| mk _l _ L _ => L
#align pgame.move_left SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft
def moveRight : ∀ g : PGame, RightMoves g → PGame
| mk _ _r _ R => R
#align pgame.move_right SetTheory.PGame.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem leftMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).LeftMoves = xl :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveLeft = xL :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_left_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_mk
@[simp]
theorem rightMoves_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).RightMoves = xr :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_mk SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_mk
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_mk {xl xr xL xR} : (⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ : PGame).moveRight = xR :=
rfl
#align pgame.move_right_mk SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_mk
-- TODO define this at the level of games, as well, and perhaps also for finsets of games.
def ofLists (L R : List PGame.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
mk (ULift (Fin L.length)) (ULift (Fin R.length)) (fun i => L.get i.down) fun j ↦ R.get j.down
#align pgame.of_lists SetTheory.PGame.ofLists
theorem leftMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves = ULift (Fin L.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_ofLists
theorem rightMoves_ofLists (L R : List PGame) : (ofLists L R).RightMoves = ULift (Fin R.length) :=
rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_of_lists SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_ofLists
def toOfListsLeftMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin L.length ≃ (ofLists L R).LeftMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (leftMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsLeftMoves
def toOfListsRightMoves {L R : List PGame} : Fin R.length ≃ (ofLists L R).RightMoves :=
((Equiv.cast (rightMoves_ofLists L R).symm).trans Equiv.ulift).symm
#align pgame.to_of_lists_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.toOfListsRightMoves
theorem ofLists_moveLeft {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin L.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft (toOfListsLeftMoves i) = L.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveLeft' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).LeftMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveLeft i = L.get (toOfListsLeftMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_left' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveLeft'
theorem ofLists_moveRight {L R : List PGame} (i : Fin R.length) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight (toOfListsRightMoves i) = R.get i :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight
@[simp]
theorem ofLists_moveRight' {L R : List PGame} (i : (ofLists L R).RightMoves) :
(ofLists L R).moveRight i = R.get (toOfListsRightMoves.symm i) :=
rfl
#align pgame.of_lists_move_right' SetTheory.PGame.ofLists_moveRight'
@[elab_as_elim]
def moveRecOn {C : PGame → Sort*} (x : PGame)
(IH : ∀ y : PGame, (∀ i, C (y.moveLeft i)) → (∀ j, C (y.moveRight j)) → C y) : C x :=
x.recOn fun yl yr yL yR => IH (mk yl yr yL yR)
#align pgame.move_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.moveRecOn
@[mk_iff]
inductive IsOption : PGame → PGame → Prop
| moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : IsOption (x.moveLeft i) x
| moveRight {x : PGame} (i : x.RightMoves) : IsOption (x.moveRight i) x
#align pgame.is_option SetTheory.PGame.IsOption
theorem IsOption.mk_left {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
(xL i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_left
theorem IsOption.mk_right {xl xr : Type u} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xr) :
(xR i).IsOption (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@IsOption.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.is_option.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.IsOption.mk_right
theorem wf_isOption : WellFounded IsOption :=
⟨fun x =>
moveRecOn x fun x IHl IHr =>
Acc.intro x fun y h => by
induction' h with _ i _ j
· exact IHl i
· exact IHr j⟩
#align pgame.wf_is_option SetTheory.PGame.wf_isOption
def Subsequent : PGame → PGame → Prop :=
TransGen IsOption
#align pgame.subsequent SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent
instance : IsTrans _ Subsequent :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTrans _ (TransGen _)
@[trans]
theorem Subsequent.trans {x y z} : Subsequent x y → Subsequent y z → Subsequent x z :=
TransGen.trans
#align pgame.subsequent.trans SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.trans
theorem wf_subsequent : WellFounded Subsequent :=
wf_isOption.transGen
#align pgame.wf_subsequent SetTheory.PGame.wf_subsequent
instance : WellFoundedRelation PGame :=
⟨_, wf_subsequent⟩
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveLeft {x : PGame} (i : x.LeftMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveLeft i) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveLeft i)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.moveRight {x : PGame} (j : x.RightMoves) : Subsequent (x.moveRight j) x :=
TransGen.single (IsOption.moveRight j)
#align pgame.subsequent.move_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.moveRight
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_left {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i : xl) :
Subsequent (xL i) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveLeft (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_left SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_left
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : xr) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) :=
@Subsequent.moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.subsequent.mk_right SetTheory.PGame.Subsequent.mk_right
macro "pgame_wf_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic| solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 })
[Prod.Lex.left, Prod.Lex.right, PSigma.Lex.left, PSigma.Lex.right,
Subsequent.moveLeft, Subsequent.moveRight, Subsequent.mk_left, Subsequent.mk_right,
Subsequent.trans] )
-- Register some consequences of pgame_wf_tac as simp-lemmas for convenience
-- (which are applied by default for WF goals)
-- This is different from mk_right from the POV of the simplifier,
-- because the unifier can't solve `xr =?= RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)` at reducible transparency.
@[simp]
theorem Subsequent.mk_right' (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j : RightMoves (mk xl xr xL xR)) :
Subsequent (xR j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveRight_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveRight j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_left (xL : xl → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xL i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
@[simp] theorem Subsequent.moveLeft_mk_right (xR : xr → PGame) (j) :
Subsequent ((xR i).moveLeft j) (mk xl xr xL xR) := by
pgame_wf_tac
-- Porting note: linter claims these lemmas don't simplify?
open Subsequent in attribute [nolint simpNF] mk_left mk_right mk_right'
moveRight_mk_left moveRight_mk_right moveLeft_mk_left moveLeft_mk_right
instance : Zero PGame :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, PEmpty, PEmpty.elim, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_leftMoves : LeftMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem zero_rightMoves : RightMoves 0 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.zero_rightMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (LeftMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_leftMoves
instance isEmpty_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 0) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_zero_rightMoves
instance : Inhabited PGame :=
⟨0⟩
instance instOnePGame : One PGame :=
⟨⟨PUnit, PEmpty, fun _ => 0, PEmpty.elim⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_leftMoves : LeftMoves 1 = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_leftMoves
@[simp]
theorem one_moveLeft (x) : moveLeft 1 x = 0 :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_move_left SetTheory.PGame.one_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem one_rightMoves : RightMoves 1 = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.one_rightMoves
instance uniqueOneLeftMoves : Unique (LeftMoves 1) :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueOneLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_one_rightMoves : IsEmpty (RightMoves 1) :=
instIsEmptyPEmpty
#align pgame.is_empty_one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_one_rightMoves
instance le : LE PGame :=
⟨Sym2.GameAdd.fix wf_isOption fun x y le =>
(∀ i, ¬le y (x.moveLeft i) (Sym2.GameAdd.snd_fst <| IsOption.moveLeft i)) ∧
∀ j, ¬le (y.moveRight j) x (Sym2.GameAdd.fst_snd <| IsOption.moveRight j)⟩
def LF (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
¬y ≤ x
#align pgame.lf SetTheory.PGame.LF
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infixl:50 " ⧏ " => PGame.LF
@[simp]
protected theorem not_le {x y : PGame} : ¬x ≤ y ↔ y ⧏ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.not_le SetTheory.PGame.not_le
@[simp]
theorem not_lf {x y : PGame} : ¬x ⧏ y ↔ y ≤ x :=
Classical.not_not
#align pgame.not_lf SetTheory.PGame.not_lf
theorem _root_.LE.le.not_gf {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y → ¬y ⧏ x :=
not_lf.2
#align has_le.le.not_gf LE.le.not_gf
theorem LF.not_ge {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y → ¬y ≤ x :=
id
#align pgame.lf.not_ge SetTheory.PGame.LF.not_ge
theorem le_iff_forall_lf {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔ (∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j := by
unfold LE.le le
simp only
rw [Sym2.GameAdd.fix_eq]
rfl
#align pgame.le_iff_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_iff_forall_lf
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ≤ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∀ i, xL i ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR) ∧ ∀ j, mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ yR j :=
le_iff_forall_lf
#align pgame.mk_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_le_mk
theorem le_of_forall_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x ⧏ y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_iff_forall_lf.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lf
theorem lf_iff_exists_le {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔ (∃ i, x ≤ y.moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ y := by
rw [LF, le_iff_forall_lf, not_and_or]
simp
#align pgame.lf_iff_exists_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_iff_exists_le
@[simp]
theorem mk_lf_mk {xl xr xL xR yl yr yL yR} :
mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR ↔ (∃ i, mk xl xr xL xR ≤ yL i) ∨ ∃ j, xR j ≤ mk yl yr yL yR :=
lf_iff_exists_le
#align pgame.mk_lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_mk
theorem le_or_gf (x y : PGame) : x ≤ y ∨ y ⧏ x := by
rw [← PGame.not_le]
apply em
#align pgame.le_or_gf SetTheory.PGame.le_or_gf
theorem moveLeft_lf_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (i) : x.moveLeft i ⧏ y :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).1 i
#align pgame.move_left_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.moveLeft_lf := moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align has_le.le.move_left_lf LE.le.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight_of_le {x y : PGame} (h : x ≤ y) (j) : x ⧏ y.moveRight j :=
(le_iff_forall_lf.1 h).2 j
#align pgame.lf_move_right_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.lf_moveRight := lf_moveRight_of_le
#align has_le.le.lf_move_right LE.le.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_of_moveRight_le {x y : PGame} {j} (h : x.moveRight j ≤ y) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inr ⟨j, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_move_right_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_moveRight_le
theorem lf_of_le_moveLeft {x y : PGame} {i} (h : x ≤ y.moveLeft i) : x ⧏ y :=
lf_iff_exists_le.2 <| Or.inl ⟨i, h⟩
#align pgame.lf_of_le_move_left SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_moveLeft
theorem lf_of_le_mk {xl xr xL xR y} : mk xl xr xL xR ≤ y → ∀ i, xL i ⧏ y :=
moveLeft_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_le_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_mk
theorem lf_of_mk_le {x yl yr yL yR} : x ≤ mk yl yr yL yR → ∀ j, x ⧏ yR j :=
lf_moveRight_of_le
#align pgame.lf_of_mk_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_mk_le
theorem mk_lf_of_le {xl xr y j} (xL) {xR : xr → PGame} : xR j ≤ y → mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ y :=
@lf_of_moveRight_le (mk _ _ _ _) y j
#align pgame.mk_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf_of_le
theorem lf_mk_of_le {x yl yr} {yL : yl → PGame} (yR) {i} : x ≤ yL i → x ⧏ mk yl yr yL yR :=
@lf_of_le_moveLeft x (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk_of_le
private theorem le_trans_aux {x y z : PGame}
(h₁ : ∀ {i}, y ≤ z → z ≤ x.moveLeft i → y ≤ x.moveLeft i)
(h₂ : ∀ {j}, z.moveRight j ≤ x → x ≤ y → z.moveRight j ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ z :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₁ hyz h).not_gf <| hxy.moveLeft_lf i)
fun j => PGame.not_le.1 fun h => (h₂ h hxy).not_gf <| hyz.lf_moveRight j
instance : Preorder PGame :=
{ PGame.le with
le_refl := fun x => by
induction' x with _ _ _ _ IHl IHr
exact
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => lf_of_le_moveLeft (IHl i)) fun i => lf_of_moveRight_le (IHr i)
le_trans := by
suffices
∀ {x y z : PGame},
(x ≤ y → y ≤ z → x ≤ z) ∧ (y ≤ z → z ≤ x → y ≤ x) ∧ (z ≤ x → x ≤ y → z ≤ y) from
fun x y z => this.1
intro x y z
induction' x with xl xr xL xR IHxl IHxr generalizing y z
induction' y with yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr generalizing z
induction' z with zl zr zL zR IHzl IHzr
exact
⟨le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHxl i).2.1) fun {j} => (IHzr j).2.2,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHyl i).2.2) fun {j} => (IHxr j).1,
le_trans_aux (fun {i} => (IHzl i).1) fun {j} => (IHyr j).2.1⟩
lt := fun x y => x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y }
theorem lt_iff_le_and_lf {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ x ⧏ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align pgame.lt_iff_le_and_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_iff_le_and_lf
theorem lt_of_le_of_lf {x y : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : x ⧏ y) : x < y :=
⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align pgame.lt_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lt_of_le_of_lf
theorem lf_of_lt {x y : PGame} (h : x < y) : x ⧏ y :=
h.2
#align pgame.lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.lf := lf_of_lt
#align has_lt.lt.lf LT.lt.lf
theorem lf_irrefl (x : PGame) : ¬x ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.not_gf
#align pgame.lf_irrefl SetTheory.PGame.lf_irrefl
instance : IsIrrefl _ (· ⧏ ·) :=
⟨lf_irrefl⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_le_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₂ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₂ (h₃.trans h₁)
#align pgame.lf_of_le_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_le_of_lf
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_le_of_lf⟩
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_le {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y ≤ z) : x ⧏ z := by
rw [← PGame.not_le] at h₁ ⊢
exact fun h₃ => h₁ (h₂.trans h₃)
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_le
-- Porting note (#10754): added instance
instance : Trans (· ⧏ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ⧏ ·) := ⟨lf_of_lf_of_le⟩
alias _root_.LE.le.trans_lf := lf_of_le_of_lf
#align has_le.le.trans_lf LE.le.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_le := lf_of_lf_of_le
#align pgame.lf.trans_le SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lt_of_lf {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : y ⧏ z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.le.trans_lf h₂
#align pgame.lf_of_lt_of_lf SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lt_of_lf
@[trans]
theorem lf_of_lf_of_lt {x y z : PGame} (h₁ : x ⧏ y) (h₂ : y < z) : x ⧏ z :=
h₁.trans_le h₂.le
#align pgame.lf_of_lf_of_lt SetTheory.PGame.lf_of_lf_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.trans_lf := lf_of_lt_of_lf
#align has_lt.lt.trans_lf LT.lt.trans_lf
alias LF.trans_lt := lf_of_lf_of_lt
#align pgame.lf.trans_lt SetTheory.PGame.LF.trans_lt
theorem moveLeft_lf {x : PGame} : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ x :=
le_rfl.moveLeft_lf
#align pgame.move_left_lf SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_lf
theorem lf_moveRight {x : PGame} : ∀ j, x ⧏ x.moveRight j :=
le_rfl.lf_moveRight
#align pgame.lf_move_right SetTheory.PGame.lf_moveRight
theorem lf_mk {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (i) : xL i ⧏ mk xl xr xL xR :=
@moveLeft_lf (mk _ _ _ _) i
#align pgame.lf_mk SetTheory.PGame.lf_mk
theorem mk_lf {xl xr} (xL : xl → PGame) (xR : xr → PGame) (j) : mk xl xr xL xR ⧏ xR j :=
@lf_moveRight (mk _ _ _ _) j
#align pgame.mk_lf SetTheory.PGame.mk_lf
theorem le_of_forall_lt {x y : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i, x.moveLeft i < y) (h₂ : ∀ j, x < y.moveRight j) :
x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_lf (fun i => (h₁ i).lf) fun i => (h₂ i).lf
#align pgame.le_of_forall_lt SetTheory.PGame.le_of_forall_lt
theorem le_def {x y : PGame} :
x ≤ y ↔
(∀ i, (∃ i', x.moveLeft i ≤ y.moveLeft i') ∨ ∃ j, (x.moveLeft i).moveRight j ≤ y) ∧
∀ j, (∃ i, x ≤ (y.moveRight j).moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j', x.moveRight j' ≤ y.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [lf_iff_exists_le]
#align pgame.le_def SetTheory.PGame.le_def
theorem lf_def {x y : PGame} :
x ⧏ y ↔
(∃ i, (∀ i', x.moveLeft i' ⧏ y.moveLeft i) ∧ ∀ j, x ⧏ (y.moveLeft i).moveRight j) ∨
∃ j, (∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i ⧏ y) ∧ ∀ j', x.moveRight j ⧏ y.moveRight j' := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
conv =>
lhs
simp only [le_iff_forall_lf]
#align pgame.lf_def SetTheory.PGame.lf_def
theorem zero_le_lf {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, 0 ⧏ x.moveRight j := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.zero_le_lf SetTheory.PGame.zero_le_lf
theorem le_zero_lf {x : PGame} : x ≤ 0 ↔ ∀ i, x.moveLeft i ⧏ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lf]
simp
#align pgame.le_zero_lf SetTheory.PGame.le_zero_lf
theorem zero_lf_le {x : PGame} : 0 ⧏ x ↔ ∃ i, 0 ≤ x.moveLeft i := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.zero_lf_le SetTheory.PGame.zero_lf_le
theorem lf_zero_le {x : PGame} : x ⧏ 0 ↔ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ 0 := by
rw [lf_iff_exists_le]
simp
#align pgame.lf_zero_le SetTheory.PGame.lf_zero_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/PGame.lean | 671 | 673 | theorem zero_le {x : PGame} : 0 ≤ x ↔ ∀ j, ∃ i, 0 ≤ (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i := by |
rw [le_def]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
#align_import group_theory.submonoid.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cf8e77c636317b059a8ce20807a29cf3772a0640"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {M N P : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (S : Submonoid M)
section
@[simps]
def Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid : Submonoid M ≃o AddSubmonoid (Additive M) where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := Additive.toMul ⁻¹' S
zero_mem' := S.one_mem'
add_mem' := fun ha hb => S.mul_mem' ha hb }
invFun S :=
{ carrier := Additive.ofMul ⁻¹' S
one_mem' := S.zero_mem'
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => S.add_mem' ha hb}
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align submonoid.to_add_submonoid Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid
#align submonoid.to_add_submonoid_symm_apply_coe Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid_symm_apply_coe
#align submonoid.to_add_submonoid_apply_coe Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid_apply_coe
abbrev AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid' : AddSubmonoid (Additive M) ≃o Submonoid M :=
Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid.symm
#align add_submonoid.to_submonoid' AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid'
theorem Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid_closure (S : Set M) :
Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid (Submonoid.closure S)
= AddSubmonoid.closure (Additive.toMul ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid.le_symm_apply.1 <|
Submonoid.closure_le.2 (AddSubmonoid.subset_closure (M := Additive M)))
(AddSubmonoid.closure_le.2 <| Submonoid.subset_closure (M := M))
#align submonoid.to_add_submonoid_closure Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid_closure
theorem AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid'_closure (S : Set (Additive M)) :
AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid' (AddSubmonoid.closure S)
= Submonoid.closure (Multiplicative.ofAdd ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid'.le_symm_apply.1 <|
AddSubmonoid.closure_le.2 (Submonoid.subset_closure (M := M)))
(Submonoid.closure_le.2 <| AddSubmonoid.subset_closure (M := Additive M))
#align add_submonoid.to_submonoid'_closure AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid'_closure
end
section
variable {A : Type*} [AddZeroClass A]
@[simps]
def AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid : AddSubmonoid A ≃o Submonoid (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S
one_mem' := S.zero_mem'
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => S.add_mem' ha hb }
invFun S :=
{ carrier := Multiplicative.ofAdd ⁻¹' S
zero_mem' := S.one_mem'
add_mem' := fun ha hb => S.mul_mem' ha hb}
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align add_submonoid.to_submonoid AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid
#align add_submonoid.to_submonoid_symm_apply_coe AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid_symm_apply_coe
#align add_submonoid.to_submonoid_apply_coe AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid_apply_coe
abbrev Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid' : Submonoid (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubmonoid A :=
AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid.symm
#align submonoid.to_add_submonoid' Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid'
theorem AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid_closure (S : Set A) :
(AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid) (AddSubmonoid.closure S)
= Submonoid.closure (Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid.to_galoisConnection.l_le <|
AddSubmonoid.closure_le.2 <| Submonoid.subset_closure (M := Multiplicative A))
(Submonoid.closure_le.2 <| AddSubmonoid.subset_closure (M := A))
#align add_submonoid.to_submonoid_closure AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid_closure
theorem Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid'_closure (S : Set (Multiplicative A)) :
Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid' (Submonoid.closure S)
= AddSubmonoid.closure (Additive.ofMul ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid'.to_galoisConnection.l_le <|
Submonoid.closure_le.2 <| AddSubmonoid.subset_closure (M := A))
(AddSubmonoid.closure_le.2 <| Submonoid.subset_closure (M := Multiplicative A))
#align submonoid.to_add_submonoid'_closure Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid'_closure
end
namespace Submonoid
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [mc : MonoidHomClass F M N]
open Set
@[to_additive
"The preimage of an `AddSubmonoid` along an `AddMonoid` homomorphism is an `AddSubmonoid`."]
def comap (f : F) (S : Submonoid N) :
Submonoid M where
carrier := f ⁻¹' S
one_mem' := show f 1 ∈ S by rw [map_one]; exact S.one_mem
mul_mem' ha hb := show f (_ * _) ∈ S by rw [map_mul]; exact S.mul_mem ha hb
#align submonoid.comap Submonoid.comap
#align add_submonoid.comap AddSubmonoid.comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_comap (S : Submonoid N) (f : F) : (S.comap f : Set M) = f ⁻¹' S :=
rfl
#align submonoid.coe_comap Submonoid.coe_comap
#align add_submonoid.coe_comap AddSubmonoid.coe_comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_comap {S : Submonoid N} {f : F} {x : M} : x ∈ S.comap f ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
#align submonoid.mem_comap Submonoid.mem_comap
#align add_submonoid.mem_comap AddSubmonoid.mem_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_comap (S : Submonoid P) (g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) :
(S.comap g).comap f = S.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align submonoid.comap_comap Submonoid.comap_comap
#align add_submonoid.comap_comap AddSubmonoid.comap_comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_id (S : Submonoid P) : S.comap (MonoidHom.id P) = S :=
ext (by simp)
#align submonoid.comap_id Submonoid.comap_id
#align add_submonoid.comap_id AddSubmonoid.comap_id
@[to_additive
"The image of an `AddSubmonoid` along an `AddMonoid` homomorphism is an `AddSubmonoid`."]
def map (f : F) (S : Submonoid M) :
Submonoid N where
carrier := f '' S
one_mem' := ⟨1, S.one_mem, map_one f⟩
mul_mem' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨x * y, S.mul_mem hx hy, by rw [map_mul]⟩
#align submonoid.map Submonoid.map
#align add_submonoid.map AddSubmonoid.map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map (f : F) (S : Submonoid M) : (S.map f : Set N) = f '' S :=
rfl
#align submonoid.coe_map Submonoid.coe_map
#align add_submonoid.coe_map AddSubmonoid.coe_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {S : Submonoid M} {y : N} : y ∈ S.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y := Iff.rfl
#align submonoid.mem_map Submonoid.mem_map
#align add_submonoid.mem_map AddSubmonoid.mem_map
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {S : Submonoid M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
#align submonoid.mem_map_of_mem Submonoid.mem_map_of_mem
#align add_submonoid.mem_map_of_mem AddSubmonoid.mem_map_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (S : Submonoid M) (x : S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
#align submonoid.apply_coe_mem_map Submonoid.apply_coe_mem_map
#align add_submonoid.apply_coe_mem_map AddSubmonoid.apply_coe_mem_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_map (g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) : (S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_image _ _ _
#align submonoid.map_map Submonoid.map_map
#align add_submonoid.map_map AddSubmonoid.map_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Submonoid.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mem_map_iff_mem {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) {S : Submonoid M} {x : M} :
f x ∈ S.map f ↔ x ∈ S :=
hf.mem_set_image
#align submonoid.mem_map_iff_mem Submonoid.mem_map_iff_mem
#align add_submonoid.mem_map_iff_mem AddSubmonoid.mem_map_iff_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {S : Submonoid M} {T : Submonoid N} :
S.map f ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
#align submonoid.map_le_iff_le_comap Submonoid.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align add_submonoid.map_le_iff_le_comap AddSubmonoid.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
#align submonoid.gc_map_comap Submonoid.gc_map_comap
#align add_submonoid.gc_map_comap AddSubmonoid.gc_map_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_of_le_comap {T : Submonoid N} {f : F} : S ≤ T.comap f → S.map f ≤ T :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
#align submonoid.map_le_of_le_comap Submonoid.map_le_of_le_comap
#align add_submonoid.map_le_of_le_comap AddSubmonoid.map_le_of_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_of_map_le {T : Submonoid N} {f : F} : S.map f ≤ T → S ≤ T.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
#align submonoid.le_comap_of_map_le Submonoid.le_comap_of_map_le
#align add_submonoid.le_comap_of_map_le AddSubmonoid.le_comap_of_map_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_map {f : F} : S ≤ (S.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
#align submonoid.le_comap_map Submonoid.le_comap_map
#align add_submonoid.le_comap_map AddSubmonoid.le_comap_map
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_le {S : Submonoid N} {f : F} : (S.comap f).map f ≤ S :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
#align submonoid.map_comap_le Submonoid.map_comap_le
#align add_submonoid.map_comap_le AddSubmonoid.map_comap_le
@[to_additive]
theorem monotone_map {f : F} : Monotone (map f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
#align submonoid.monotone_map Submonoid.monotone_map
#align add_submonoid.monotone_map AddSubmonoid.monotone_map
@[to_additive]
theorem monotone_comap {f : F} : Monotone (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_u
#align submonoid.monotone_comap Submonoid.monotone_comap
#align add_submonoid.monotone_comap AddSubmonoid.monotone_comap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comap_map {f : F} : ((S.map f).comap f).map f = S.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l _
#align submonoid.map_comap_map Submonoid.map_comap_map
#align add_submonoid.map_comap_map AddSubmonoid.map_comap_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_map_comap {S : Submonoid N} {f : F} : ((S.comap f).map f).comap f = S.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u _
#align submonoid.comap_map_comap Submonoid.comap_map_comap
#align add_submonoid.comap_map_comap AddSubmonoid.comap_map_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_sup (S T : Submonoid M) (f : F) : (S ⊔ T).map f = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
#align submonoid.map_sup Submonoid.map_sup
#align add_submonoid.map_sup AddSubmonoid.map_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (s : ι → Submonoid M) : (iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
#align submonoid.map_supr Submonoid.map_iSup
#align add_submonoid.map_supr AddSubmonoid.map_iSup
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_inf (S T : Submonoid N) (f : F) : (S ⊓ T).comap f = S.comap f ⊓ T.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_inf
#align submonoid.comap_inf Submonoid.comap_inf
#align add_submonoid.comap_inf AddSubmonoid.comap_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (s : ι → Submonoid N) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
#align submonoid.comap_infi Submonoid.comap_iInf
#align add_submonoid.comap_infi AddSubmonoid.comap_iInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_bot (f : F) : (⊥ : Submonoid M).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
#align submonoid.map_bot Submonoid.map_bot
#align add_submonoid.map_bot AddSubmonoid.map_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_top (f : F) : (⊤ : Submonoid N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
#align submonoid.comap_top Submonoid.comap_top
#align add_submonoid.comap_top AddSubmonoid.comap_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id (S : Submonoid M) : S.map (MonoidHom.id M) = S :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨_, h, rfl⟩⟩
#align submonoid.map_id Submonoid.map_id
#align add_submonoid.map_id AddSubmonoid.map_id
variable {A : Type*} [SetLike A M] [hA : SubmonoidClass A M] (S' : A)
instance AddSubmonoidClass.nSMul {M} [AddMonoid M] {A : Type*} [SetLike A M]
[AddSubmonoidClass A M] (S : A) : SMul ℕ S :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a.1, nsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_submonoid_class.has_nsmul AddSubmonoidClass.nSMul
namespace Submonoid
open MonoidHom
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Submonoid/Operations.lean | 1,225 | 1,225 | theorem mrange_inl : mrange (inl M N) = prod ⊤ ⊥ := by | simpa only [mrange_eq_map] using map_inl ⊤
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
#align_import algebra.algebra.hom from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e97cf15cd1aec9bd5c193b2ffac5a6dc9118912b"
universe u v w u₁ v₁
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): linter not ported yet
structure AlgHom (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] extends RingHom A B where
commutes' : ∀ r : R, toFun (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
#align alg_hom AlgHom
add_decl_doc AlgHom.toRingHom
@[inherit_doc AlgHom]
infixr:25 " →ₐ " => AlgHom _
@[inherit_doc]
notation:25 A " →ₐ[" R "] " B => AlgHom R A B
class AlgHomClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*)
[CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[FunLike F A B] extends RingHomClass F A B : Prop where
commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
#align alg_hom_class AlgHomClass
-- Porting note: `dangerousInstance` linter has become smarter about `outParam`s
-- attribute [nolint dangerousInstance] AlgHomClass.toRingHomClass
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- attribute [simp] AlgHomClass.commutes
namespace AlgHom
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type u₁} {D : Type v₁}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Semiring C] [Semiring D]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R C] [Algebra R D]
-- Porting note: we don't port specialized `CoeFun` instances if there is `DFunLike` instead
#noalign alg_hom.has_coe_to_fun
instance funLike : FunLike (A →ₐ[R] B) A B where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _, _⟩, _⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _, _⟩, _⟩
congr
-- Porting note: This instance is moved.
instance algHomClass : AlgHomClass (A →ₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
commutes f := f.commutes'
#align alg_hom.alg_hom_class AlgHom.algHomClass
def Simps.apply {R : Type u} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} [CommSemiring R]
[Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : α → β := f
initialize_simps_projections AlgHom (toFun → apply)
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A →ₐ[R] B) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_coe AlgHom.coe_coe
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.to_fun_eq_coe AlgHom.toFun_eq_coe
#noalign alg_hom.coe_ring_hom
-- Porting note (#11445): A new definition underlying a coercion `↑`.
@[coe]
def toMonoidHom' (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : A →* B := (f : A →+* B)
instance coeOutMonoidHom : CoeOut (A →ₐ[R] B) (A →* B) :=
⟨AlgHom.toMonoidHom'⟩
#align alg_hom.coe_monoid_hom AlgHom.coeOutMonoidHom
-- Porting note (#11445): A new definition underlying a coercion `↑`.
@[coe]
def toAddMonoidHom' (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : A →+ B := (f : A →+* B)
instance coeOutAddMonoidHom : CoeOut (A →ₐ[R] B) (A →+ B) :=
⟨AlgHom.toAddMonoidHom'⟩
#align alg_hom.coe_add_monoid_hom AlgHom.coeOutAddMonoidHom
-- Porting note: Lean 3: `@[simp, norm_cast] coe_mk`
-- Lean 4: `@[simp] coe_mk` & `@[norm_cast] coe_mks`
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {f : A →+* B} (h) : ((⟨f, h⟩ : A →ₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mks {f : A → B} (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) : ⇑(⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄⟩, h₅⟩ : A →ₐ[R] B) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_mk AlgHom.coe_mks
-- Porting note: This theorem is new.
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ringHom_mk {f : A →+* B} (h) : ((⟨f, h⟩ : A →ₐ[R] B) : A →+* B) = f :=
rfl
-- make the coercion the simp-normal form
@[simp]
theorem toRingHom_eq_coe (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : f.toRingHom = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.to_ring_hom_eq_coe AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toRingHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(f : A →+* B) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_to_ring_hom AlgHom.coe_toRingHom
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toMonoidHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(f : A →* B) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_to_monoid_hom AlgHom.coe_toMonoidHom
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(f : A →+ B) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_to_add_monoid_hom AlgHom.coe_toAddMonoidHom
variable (φ : A →ₐ[R] B)
theorem coe_fn_injective : @Function.Injective (A →ₐ[R] B) (A → B) (↑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
#align alg_hom.coe_fn_injective AlgHom.coe_fn_injective
theorem coe_fn_inj {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} : (φ₁ : A → B) = φ₂ ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align alg_hom.coe_fn_inj AlgHom.coe_fn_inj
theorem coe_ringHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A →ₐ[R] B) → A →+* B) := fun φ₁ φ₂ H =>
coe_fn_injective <| show ((φ₁ : A →+* B) : A → B) = ((φ₂ : A →+* B) : A → B) from congr_arg _ H
#align alg_hom.coe_ring_hom_injective AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective
theorem coe_monoidHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A →ₐ[R] B) → A →* B) :=
RingHom.coe_monoidHom_injective.comp coe_ringHom_injective
#align alg_hom.coe_monoid_hom_injective AlgHom.coe_monoidHom_injective
theorem coe_addMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A →ₐ[R] B) → A →+ B) :=
RingHom.coe_addMonoidHom_injective.comp coe_ringHom_injective
#align alg_hom.coe_add_monoid_hom_injective AlgHom.coe_addMonoidHom_injective
protected theorem congr_fun {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} (H : φ₁ = φ₂) (x : A) : φ₁ x = φ₂ x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun H x
#align alg_hom.congr_fun AlgHom.congr_fun
protected theorem congr_arg (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) {x y : A} (h : x = y) : φ x = φ y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg φ h
#align alg_hom.congr_arg AlgHom.congr_arg
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} (H : ∀ x, φ₁ x = φ₂ x) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
#align alg_hom.ext AlgHom.ext
theorem ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B} : φ₁ = φ₂ ↔ ∀ x, φ₁ x = φ₂ x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align alg_hom.ext_iff AlgHom.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) : (⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄⟩, h₅⟩ : A →ₐ[R] B) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align alg_hom.mk_coe AlgHom.mk_coe
@[simp]
theorem commutes (r : R) : φ (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r :=
φ.commutes' r
#align alg_hom.commutes AlgHom.commutes
theorem comp_algebraMap : (φ : A →+* B).comp (algebraMap R A) = algebraMap R B :=
RingHom.ext <| φ.commutes
#align alg_hom.comp_algebra_map AlgHom.comp_algebraMap
protected theorem map_add (r s : A) : φ (r + s) = φ r + φ s :=
map_add _ _ _
#align alg_hom.map_add AlgHom.map_add
protected theorem map_zero : φ 0 = 0 :=
map_zero _
#align alg_hom.map_zero AlgHom.map_zero
protected theorem map_mul (x y) : φ (x * y) = φ x * φ y :=
map_mul _ _ _
#align alg_hom.map_mul AlgHom.map_mul
protected theorem map_one : φ 1 = 1 :=
map_one _
#align alg_hom.map_one AlgHom.map_one
protected theorem map_pow (x : A) (n : ℕ) : φ (x ^ n) = φ x ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
#align alg_hom.map_pow AlgHom.map_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
protected theorem map_smul (r : R) (x : A) : φ (r • x) = r • φ x :=
map_smul _ _ _
#align alg_hom.map_smul AlgHom.map_smul
protected theorem map_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → A) (s : Finset ι) :
φ (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, φ (f x) :=
map_sum _ _ _
#align alg_hom.map_sum AlgHom.map_sum
protected theorem map_finsupp_sum {α : Type*} [Zero α] {ι : Type*} (f : ι →₀ α) (g : ι → α → A) :
φ (f.sum g) = f.sum fun i a => φ (g i a) :=
map_finsupp_sum _ _ _
#align alg_hom.map_finsupp_sum AlgHom.map_finsupp_sum
#noalign alg_hom.map_bit0
#noalign alg_hom.map_bit1
def mk' (f : A →+* B) (h : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ f with
toFun := f
commutes' := fun c => by simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, h, f.map_one] }
#align alg_hom.mk' AlgHom.mk'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : A →+* B) (h : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : ⇑(mk' f h) = f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_mk' AlgHom.coe_mk'
section
variable (R A)
protected def id : A →ₐ[R] A :=
{ RingHom.id A with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
#align alg_hom.id AlgHom.id
@[simp]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(AlgHom.id R A) = id :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_id AlgHom.coe_id
@[simp]
theorem id_toRingHom : (AlgHom.id R A : A →+* A) = RingHom.id _ :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.id_to_ring_hom AlgHom.id_toRingHom
end
theorem id_apply (p : A) : AlgHom.id R A p = p :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.id_apply AlgHom.id_apply
def comp (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) : A →ₐ[R] C :=
{ φ₁.toRingHom.comp ↑φ₂ with
commutes' := fun r : R => by rw [← φ₁.commutes, ← φ₂.commutes]; rfl }
#align alg_hom.comp AlgHom.comp
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(φ₁.comp φ₂) = φ₁ ∘ φ₂ :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_comp AlgHom.coe_comp
theorem comp_apply (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) (p : A) : φ₁.comp φ₂ p = φ₁ (φ₂ p) :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.comp_apply AlgHom.comp_apply
theorem comp_toRingHom (φ₁ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(φ₁.comp φ₂ : A →+* C) = (φ₁ : B →+* C).comp ↑φ₂ :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.comp_to_ring_hom AlgHom.comp_toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem comp_id : φ.comp (AlgHom.id R A) = φ :=
ext fun _x => rfl
#align alg_hom.comp_id AlgHom.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem id_comp : (AlgHom.id R B).comp φ = φ :=
ext fun _x => rfl
#align alg_hom.id_comp AlgHom.id_comp
theorem comp_assoc (φ₁ : C →ₐ[R] D) (φ₂ : B →ₐ[R] C) (φ₃ : A →ₐ[R] B) :
(φ₁.comp φ₂).comp φ₃ = φ₁.comp (φ₂.comp φ₃) :=
ext fun _x => rfl
#align alg_hom.comp_assoc AlgHom.comp_assoc
def toLinearMap : A →ₗ[R] B where
toFun := φ
map_add' := map_add _
map_smul' := map_smul _
#align alg_hom.to_linear_map AlgHom.toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem toLinearMap_apply (p : A) : φ.toLinearMap p = φ p :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.to_linear_map_apply AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply
theorem toLinearMap_injective :
Function.Injective (toLinearMap : _ → A →ₗ[R] B) := fun _φ₁ _φ₂ h =>
ext <| LinearMap.congr_fun h
#align alg_hom.to_linear_map_injective AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective
@[simp]
theorem comp_toLinearMap (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(g.comp f).toLinearMap = g.toLinearMap.comp f.toLinearMap :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.comp_to_linear_map AlgHom.comp_toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem toLinearMap_id : toLinearMap (AlgHom.id R A) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
#align alg_hom.to_linear_map_id AlgHom.toLinearMap_id
@[simps]
def ofLinearMap (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (map_one : f 1 = 1) (map_mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := f
map_one' := map_one
map_mul' := map_mul
commutes' := fun c => by simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, f.map_smul, map_one] }
#align alg_hom.of_linear_map AlgHom.ofLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem ofLinearMap_toLinearMap (map_one) (map_mul) :
ofLinearMap φ.toLinearMap map_one map_mul = φ := by
ext
rfl
#align alg_hom.of_linear_map_to_linear_map AlgHom.ofLinearMap_toLinearMap
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Hom.lean | 395 | 398 | theorem toLinearMap_ofLinearMap (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (map_one) (map_mul) :
toLinearMap (ofLinearMap f map_one map_mul) = f := by |
ext
rfl
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import linear_algebra.pi_tensor_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ce11c3c2a285bbe6937e26d9792fda4e51f3fe1a"
suppress_compilation
open Function
section Semiring
variable {ι ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R₁ R₂ : Type*}
variable {s : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (s i)] [∀ i, Module R (s i)]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommMonoid F]
variable (R) (s)
def PiTensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).Quotient
#align pi_tensor_product PiTensorProduct
variable {R}
unsuppress_compilation in
scoped[TensorProduct] notation3:100"⨂["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => PiTensorProduct R f) => r
open TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section Module
instance : AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).addMonoid with
add_comm := fun x y ↦
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ ↦
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (⨂[R] i, s i) := ⟨0⟩
variable (R) {s}
def tprodCoeff (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) : ⨂[R] i, s i :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)
#align pi_tensor_product.tprod_coeff PiTensorProduct.tprodCoeff
variable {R}
theorem zero_tprodCoeff (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R 0 f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_scalar _
#align pi_tensor_product.zero_tprod_coeff PiTensorProduct.zero_tprodCoeff
theorem zero_tprodCoeff' (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (hf : f i = 0) : tprodCoeff R z f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero _ _ i hf
#align pi_tensor_product.zero_tprod_coeff' PiTensorProduct.zero_tprodCoeff'
theorem add_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₁) + tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₂) =
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (m₁ + m₂)) :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add _ z f i m₁ m₂)
#align pi_tensor_product.add_tprod_coeff PiTensorProduct.add_tprodCoeff
theorem add_tprodCoeff' (z₁ z₂ : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
tprodCoeff R z₁ f + tprodCoeff R z₂ f = tprodCoeff R (z₁ + z₂) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f)
#align pi_tensor_product.add_tprod_coeff' PiTensorProduct.add_tprodCoeff'
theorem smul_tprodCoeff_aux [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r * z) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _ _ _
#align pi_tensor_product.smul_tprod_coeff_aux PiTensorProduct.smul_tprodCoeff_aux
theorem smul_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R₁) [SMul R₁ R]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R R] [SMul R₁ (s i)] [IsScalarTower R₁ R (s i)] :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := by
have h₁ : r • z = r • (1 : R) * z := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
have h₂ : r • f i = (r • (1 : R)) • f i := (smul_one_smul _ _ _).symm
rw [h₁, h₂]
exact smul_tprodCoeff_aux z f i _
#align pi_tensor_product.smul_tprod_coeff PiTensorProduct.smul_tprodCoeff
def liftAddHom (φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F)
(C0 : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), φ (r, f) = 0)
(C0' : ∀ f : Π i, s i, φ (0, f) = 0)
(C_add : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
φ (r, update f i m₁) + φ (r, update f i m₂) = φ (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
(C_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i), φ (r, f) + φ (r', f) = φ (r + r', f))
(C_smul : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
φ (r, update f i (r' • f i)) = φ (r' * r, f)) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) →+ F :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift φ) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy ↦
match hxy with
| Eqv.of_zero r' f i hf =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0 r' f i hf]
| Eqv.of_zero_scalar f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0']
| Eqv.of_add inst z f i m₁ m₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_add inst]
| Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C_add_scalar]
| Eqv.of_smul inst z f i r' =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_smul inst]
| Eqv.add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, add_comm]
#align pi_tensor_product.lift_add_hom PiTensorProduct.liftAddHom
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(tprodCoeff : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (tprodCoeff R r f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
have C0 : motive 0 := by
have h₁ := tprodCoeff 0 0
rwa [zero_tprodCoeff] at h₁
refine AddCon.induction_on z fun x ↦ FreeAddMonoid.recOn x C0 ?_
simp_rw [AddCon.coe_add]
refine fun f y ih ↦ add _ _ ?_ ih
convert tprodCoeff f.1 f.2
#align pi_tensor_product.induction_on' PiTensorProduct.induction_on'
section Multilinear
open MultilinearMap
variable {s}
section lift
def liftAux (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) : (⨂[R] i, s i) →+ E :=
liftAddHom (fun p : R × Π i, s i ↦ p.1 • φ p.2)
(fun z f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [map_coord_zero φ i hf, smul_zero])
(fun f ↦ by simp_rw [zero_smul])
(fun z f i m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp_rw [← smul_add, φ.map_add])
(fun z₁ z₂ f ↦ by rw [← add_smul])
fun z f i r ↦ by simp [φ.map_smul, smul_smul, mul_comm]
#align pi_tensor_product.lift_aux PiTensorProduct.liftAux
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/PiTensorProduct.lean | 433 | 446 | theorem liftAux_tprod (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) (f : Π i, s i) : liftAux φ (tprod R f) = φ f := by |
simp only [liftAux, liftAddHom, tprod_eq_tprodCoeff_one, tprodCoeff, AddCon.coe_mk']
-- The end of this proof was very different before leanprover/lean4#2644:
-- rw [FreeAddMonoid.of, FreeAddMonoid.ofList, Equiv.refl_apply, AddCon.lift_coe]
-- dsimp [FreeAddMonoid.lift, FreeAddMonoid.sumAux]
-- show _ • _ = _
-- rw [one_smul]
erw [AddCon.lift_coe]
erw [FreeAddMonoid.of]
dsimp [FreeAddMonoid.ofList]
rw [← one_smul R (φ f)]
erw [Equiv.refl_apply]
convert one_smul R (φ f)
simp
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
#align_import group_theory.noncomm_pi_coprod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6f9f36364eae3f42368b04858fd66d6d9ae730d8"
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
@[to_additive "`Finset.noncommSum` is “injective” in `f` if `f` maps into independent subgroups.
This generalizes (one direction of) `AddSubgroup.disjoint_iff_add_eq_zero`. "]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/NoncommPiCoprod.lean | 55 | 78 | theorem eq_one_of_noncommProd_eq_one_of_independent {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → G) (comm)
(K : ι → Subgroup G) (hind : CompleteLattice.Independent K) (hmem : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ K x)
(heq1 : s.noncommProd f comm = 1) : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by |
classical
revert heq1
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hnmem ih
· simp
· have hcomm := comm.mono (Finset.coe_subset.2 <| Finset.subset_insert _ _)
simp only [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hmem
have hmem_bsupr : s.noncommProd f hcomm ∈ ⨆ i ∈ (s : Set ι), K i := by
refine Subgroup.noncommProd_mem _ _ ?_
intro x hx
have : K x ≤ ⨆ i ∈ (s : Set ι), K i := le_iSup₂ (f := fun i _ => K i) x hx
exact this (hmem.2 x hx)
intro heq1
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hnmem] at heq1
have hnmem' : i ∉ (s : Set ι) := by simpa
obtain ⟨heq1i : f i = 1, heq1S : s.noncommProd f _ = 1⟩ :=
Subgroup.disjoint_iff_mul_eq_one.mp (hind.disjoint_biSup hnmem') hmem.1 hmem_bsupr heq1
intro i h
simp only [Finset.mem_insert] at h
rcases h with (rfl | h)
· exact heq1i
· refine ih hcomm hmem.2 heq1S _ h
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import field_theory.finite.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"12a85fac627bea918960da036049d611b1a3ee43"
variable {K : Type*} {R : Type*}
local notation "q" => Fintype.card K
open Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace FiniteField
theorem prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [Fintype Kˣ] :
∏ x : Kˣ, x = (-1 : Kˣ) := by
classical
have : (∏ x ∈ (@univ Kˣ _).erase (-1), x) = 1 :=
prod_involution (fun x _ => x⁻¹) (by simp)
(fun a => by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Units.inv_eq_self_iff])
(fun a => by simp [@inv_eq_iff_eq_inv _ _ a]) (by simp)
rw [← insert_erase (mem_univ (-1 : Kˣ)), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), this, mul_one]
#align finite_field.prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one FiniteField.prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem card_cast_subgroup_card_ne_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K] [Nontrivial K]
(G : Subgroup Kˣ) [Fintype G] : (Fintype.card G : K) ≠ 0 := by
let n := Fintype.card G
intro nzero
have ⟨p, char_p⟩ := CharP.exists K
have hd : p ∣ n := (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff K p n).mp nzero
cases CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero K p with
| inr pzero =>
exact (Fintype.card_pos).ne' <| Nat.eq_zero_of_zero_dvd <| pzero ▸ hd
| inl pprime =>
have fact_pprime := Fact.mk pprime
-- G has an element x of order p by Cauchy's theorem
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card p hd
-- F has an element u (= ↑↑x) of order p
let u := ((x : Kˣ) : K)
have hu : orderOf u = p := by rwa [orderOf_units, Subgroup.orderOf_coe]
-- u ^ p = 1 implies (u - 1) ^ p = 0 and hence u = 1 ...
have h : u = 1 := by
rw [← sub_left_inj, sub_self 1]
apply pow_eq_zero (n := p)
rw [sub_pow_char_of_commute, one_pow, ← hu, pow_orderOf_eq_one, sub_self]
exact Commute.one_right u
-- ... meaning x didn't have order p after all, contradiction
apply pprime.one_lt.ne
rw [← hu, h, orderOf_one]
theorem sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] (hg : G ≠ ⊥) :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = 0 := by
rw [Subgroup.ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨a, ha⟩
-- The action of a on G as an embedding
let a_mul_emb : G ↪ G := mulLeftEmbedding a
-- ... and leaves G unchanged
have h_unchanged : Finset.univ.map a_mul_emb = Finset.univ := by simp
-- Therefore the sum of x over a G is the sum of a x over G
have h_sum_map := Finset.univ.sum_map a_mul_emb fun x => ((x : Kˣ) : K)
-- ... and the former is the sum of x over G.
-- By algebraic manipulation, we have Σ G, x = ∑ G, a x = a ∑ G, x
simp only [a_mul_emb, h_unchanged, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.Embedding.toFun_eq_coe,
mulLeftEmbedding_apply, Submonoid.coe_mul, Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid, Units.val_mul,
← Finset.mul_sum] at h_sum_map
-- thus one of (a - 1) or ∑ G, x is zero
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) - 1) = 0 ∨ ∑ x : ↥G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) = 0 := by
rw [← mul_eq_zero, sub_mul, ← h_sum_map, one_mul, sub_self]
apply Or.resolve_left hzero
contrapose! ha
ext
rwa [← sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_units [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] [Decidable (G = ⊥)] :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = if G = ⊥ then 1 else 0 := by
by_cases G_bot : G = ⊥
· subst G_bot
simp only [ite_true, Subgroup.mem_bot, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_one,
Nat.cast_zero, univ_unique, Set.default_coe_singleton, sum_singleton, Units.val_one]
· simp only [G_bot, ite_false]
exact sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero G_bot
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_pow_eq_zero [CommRing K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Fintype.card G) :
∑ x : G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k = 0 := by
nontriviality K
have := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain K
rcases (exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic k_pos k_lt_card_G) with ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
have h_multiset_map :
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) =
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) := by
simp_rw [← mul_pow]
have as_comp :
(fun x : ↥G => (((x : Kˣ) : K) * ((a : Kˣ) : K)) ^ k)
= (fun x : ↥G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) ∘ fun x : ↥G => x * a := by
funext x
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Submonoid.coe_mul, Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid, Units.val_mul]
rw [as_comp, ← Multiset.map_map]
congr
rw [eq_comm]
exact Multiset.map_univ_val_equiv (Equiv.mulRight a)
have h_multiset_map_sum : (Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum =
(Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum := by
rw [h_multiset_map]
rw [Multiset.sum_map_mul_right] at h_multiset_map_sum
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k - 1 : K)
* (Multiset.map (fun i : G => (i.val : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum = 0 := by
rw [sub_mul, mul_comm, ← h_multiset_map_sum, one_mul, sub_self]
rw [mul_eq_zero] at hzero
refine hzero.resolve_left fun h => ha ?_
ext
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
simp_rw [SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, OneMemClass.coe_one, Units.val_one, h]
section
variable [GroupWithZero K] [Fintype K]
theorem pow_card_sub_one_eq_one (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ^ (q - 1) = 1 := by
calc
a ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) = (Units.mk0 a ha ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) : Kˣ).1 := by
rw [Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_mk0]
_ = 1 := by
classical
rw [← Fintype.card_units, pow_card_eq_one]
rfl
#align finite_field.pow_card_sub_one_eq_one FiniteField.pow_card_sub_one_eq_one
theorem pow_card (a : K) : a ^ q = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [h]; apply zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos Fintype.card_pos, pow_succ, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one,
pow_card_sub_one_eq_one a h, one_mul]
#align finite_field.pow_card FiniteField.pow_card
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Finite/Basic.lean | 232 | 235 | theorem pow_card_pow (n : ℕ) (a : K) : a ^ q ^ n = a := by |
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, pow_mul, ih, pow_card]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
floor : α → ℕ
ceil : α → ℕ
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
floor : α → ℤ
ceil : α → ℤ
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,005 | 1,008 | theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by |
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
#align_import analysis.analytic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal
open Set Filter Asymptotics
section
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf pg : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞}
structure HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
Prop where
r_le : r ≤ p.radius
r_pos : 0 < r
hasSum :
∀ {y}, y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r → HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y))
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball HasFPowerSeriesOnBall
def HasFPowerSeriesAt (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) :=
∃ r, HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r
#align has_fpower_series_at HasFPowerSeriesAt
variable (𝕜)
def AnalyticAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x
#align analytic_at AnalyticAt
def AnalyticOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x, x ∈ s → AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x
#align analytic_on AnalyticOn
variable {𝕜}
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x :=
⟨r, hf⟩
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.has_fpower_series_at HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨p, hf⟩
#align has_fpower_series_at.analytic_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.analyticAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.analytic_at HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.analyticAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.congr (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(hg : EqOn f g (EMetric.ball x r)) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g p x r :=
{ r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun {y} hy => by
convert hf.hasSum hy using 1
apply hg.symm
simpa [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] using hy }
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.congr HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.congr
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.comp_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (y : E) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun z => f (z - y)) p (x + y) r :=
{ r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun {z} hz => by
convert hf.hasSum hz using 2
abel }
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.comp_sub HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.comp_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball x r) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => y - x) (f y) := by
have : y - x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simpa [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] using hy
simpa only [add_sub_cancel] using hf.hasSum this
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.has_sum_sub HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : 0 < p.radius :=
lt_of_lt_of_le hf.r_pos hf.r_le
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.radius_pos HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.radius_pos
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : 0 < p.radius :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.radius_pos
#align has_fpower_series_at.radius_pos HasFPowerSeriesAt.radius_pos
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (r'_pos : 0 < r')
(hr : r' ≤ r) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r' :=
⟨le_trans hr hf.1, r'_pos, fun hy => hf.hasSum (EMetric.ball_subset_ball hr hy)⟩
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.mono HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.mono
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.congr (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt g p x := by
rcases hf with ⟨r₁, h₁⟩
rcases EMetric.mem_nhds_iff.mp hg with ⟨r₂, h₂pos, h₂⟩
exact ⟨min r₁ r₂,
(h₁.mono (lt_min h₁.r_pos h₂pos) inf_le_left).congr
fun y hy => h₂ (EMetric.ball_subset_ball inf_le_right hy)⟩
#align has_fpower_series_at.congr HasFPowerSeriesAt.congr
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ r : ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝[>] 0, HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi (left_mem_Ico.2 hr.r_pos)) fun _ hr' =>
hr.mono hr'.1 hr'.2.le
#align has_fpower_series_at.eventually HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 0, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y)) := by
filter_upwards [EMetric.ball_mem_nhds (0 : E) hf.r_pos] using fun _ => hf.hasSum
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.eventually_has_sum HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 0, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y)) :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_hasSum
#align has_fpower_series_at.eventually_has_sum HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y - x) (f y) := by
filter_upwards [EMetric.ball_mem_nhds x hf.r_pos] with y using hf.hasSum_sub
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.eventually_has_sum_sub HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y - x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_hasSum_sub
#align has_fpower_series_at.eventually_has_sum_sub HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_eq_zero
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) x r) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, f z = 0 := by
filter_upwards [hf.eventually_hasSum_sub] with z hz using hz.unique hasSum_zero
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.eventually_eq_zero HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_eq_zero
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_eq_zero
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) x) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, f z = 0 :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_eq_zero
#align has_fpower_series_at.eventually_eq_zero HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_eq_zero
theorem hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e ⊤ := by
refine ⟨by simp, WithTop.zero_lt_top, fun _ => hasSum_single 0 fun n hn => ?_⟩
simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries_apply hn]
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball_const hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const
theorem hasFPowerSeriesAt_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e :=
⟨⊤, hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const⟩
#align has_fpower_series_at_const hasFPowerSeriesAt_const
theorem analyticAt_const {v : F} : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) x :=
⟨constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v, hasFPowerSeriesAt_const⟩
#align analytic_at_const analyticAt_const
theorem analyticOn_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
fun _ _ => analyticAt_const
#align analytic_on_const analyticOn_const
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.add (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x r) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) x r :=
{ r_le := le_trans (le_min_iff.2 ⟨hf.r_le, hg.r_le⟩) (pf.min_radius_le_radius_add pg)
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun hy => (hf.hasSum hy).add (hg.hasSum hy) }
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.add HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.add
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.add (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) (hg : HasFPowerSeriesAt g pg x) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (f + g) (pf + pg) x := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
#align has_fpower_series_at.add HasFPowerSeriesAt.add
theorem AnalyticAt.congr (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x :=
let ⟨_, hpf⟩ := hf
(hpf.congr hg).analyticAt
theorem analyticAt_congr (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x ↔ AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.congr h, fun hg ↦ hg.congr h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticAt.add (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (f + g) x :=
let ⟨_, hpf⟩ := hf
let ⟨_, hqf⟩ := hg
(hpf.add hqf).analyticAt
#align analytic_at.add AnalyticAt.add
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.neg (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (-f) (-pf) x r :=
{ r_le := by
rw [pf.radius_neg]
exact hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun hy => (hf.hasSum hy).neg }
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.neg HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.neg
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.neg (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) : HasFPowerSeriesAt (-f) (-pf) x :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.neg.hasFPowerSeriesAt
#align has_fpower_series_at.neg HasFPowerSeriesAt.neg
theorem AnalyticAt.neg (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (-f) x :=
let ⟨_, hpf⟩ := hf
hpf.neg.analyticAt
#align analytic_at.neg AnalyticAt.neg
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x r) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (f - g) (pf - pg) x r := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.sub HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) (hg : HasFPowerSeriesAt g pg x) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (f - g) (pf - pg) x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align has_fpower_series_at.sub HasFPowerSeriesAt.sub
theorem AnalyticAt.sub (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x) :
AnalyticAt 𝕜 (f - g) x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align analytic_at.sub AnalyticAt.sub
theorem AnalyticOn.mono {s t : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun z hz => hf z (hst hz)
#align analytic_on.mono AnalyticOn.mono
theorem AnalyticOn.congr' {s : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).congr (mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mp hg z hz)
theorem analyticOn_congr' {s : Set E} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticOn.congr {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : s.EqOn f g) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s :=
hf.congr' <| mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mpr
(fun _ hz => eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨s, hs.mem_nhds hz, hg⟩)
theorem analyticOn_congr {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) (h : s.EqOn f g) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s ↔
AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s := ⟨fun hf => hf.congr hs h, fun hg => hg.congr hs h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticOn.add {s : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (f + g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).add (hg z hz)
#align analytic_on.add AnalyticOn.add
theorem AnalyticOn.sub {s : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (f - g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).sub (hg z hz)
#align analytic_on.sub AnalyticOn.sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
pf 0 v = f x := by
have v_eq : v = fun i => 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
have zero_mem : (0 : E) ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simp [hf.r_pos]
have : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → (pf i fun j => 0) = 0 := by
intro i hi
have : 0 < i := pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hi
exact ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero _ (⟨0, this⟩ : Fin i) rfl
have A := (hf.hasSum zero_mem).unique (hasSum_single _ this)
simpa [v_eq] using A.symm
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.coeff_zero HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.coeff_zero
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
pf 0 v = f x :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.coeff_zero v
#align has_fpower_series_at.coeff_zero HasFPowerSeriesAt.coeff_zero
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (g ∘ f) (g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p) x r :=
{ r_le := h.r_le.trans (p.radius_le_radius_continuousLinearMap_comp _)
r_pos := h.r_pos
hasSum := fun hy => by
simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.compFormalMultilinearSeries_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, Function.comp_apply] using
g.hasSum (h.hasSum hy) }
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_has_fpower_series_on_ball ContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_analyticOn {s : Set E} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s := by
rintro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨p, r, hp⟩
exact ⟨g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p, r, g.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall hp⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_analytic_on ContinuousLinearMap.comp_analyticOn
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.uniform_geometric_approx' {r' : ℝ≥0}
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (h : (r' : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ y ∈ Metric.ball (0 : E) r', ∀ n,
‖f (x + y) - p.partialSum n y‖ ≤ C * (a * (‖y‖ / r')) ^ n := by
obtain ⟨a, ha, C, hC, hp⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r' : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n :=
p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (h.trans_le hf.r_le)
refine ⟨a, ha, C / (1 - a), div_pos hC (sub_pos.2 ha.2), fun y hy n => ?_⟩
have yr' : ‖y‖ < r' := by
rw [ball_zero_eq] at hy
exact hy
have hr'0 : 0 < (r' : ℝ) := (norm_nonneg _).trans_lt yr'
have : y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by
refine mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff.2 (lt_trans ?_ h)
exact mod_cast yr'
rw [norm_sub_rev, ← mul_div_right_comm]
have ya : a * (‖y‖ / ↑r') ≤ a :=
mul_le_of_le_one_right ha.1.le (div_le_one_of_le yr'.le r'.coe_nonneg)
suffices ‖p.partialSum n y - f (x + y)‖ ≤ C * (a * (‖y‖ / r')) ^ n / (1 - a * (‖y‖ / r')) by
refine this.trans ?_
have : 0 < a := ha.1
gcongr
apply_rules [sub_pos.2, ha.2]
apply norm_sub_le_of_geometric_bound_of_hasSum (ya.trans_lt ha.2) _ (hf.hasSum this)
intro n
calc
‖(p n) fun _ : Fin n => y‖
_ ≤ ‖p n‖ * ∏ _i : Fin n, ‖y‖ := ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
_ = ‖p n‖ * (r' : ℝ) ^ n * (‖y‖ / r') ^ n := by field_simp [mul_right_comm]
_ ≤ C * a ^ n * (‖y‖ / r') ^ n := by gcongr ?_ * _; apply hp
_ ≤ C * (a * (‖y‖ / r')) ^ n := by rw [mul_pow, mul_assoc]
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.uniform_geometric_approx' HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.uniform_geometric_approx'
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.uniform_geometric_approx {r' : ℝ≥0}
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (h : (r' : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1,
∃ C > 0, ∀ y ∈ Metric.ball (0 : E) r', ∀ n, ‖f (x + y) - p.partialSum n y‖ ≤ C * a ^ n := by
obtain ⟨a, ha, C, hC, hp⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ y ∈ Metric.ball (0 : E) r', ∀ n,
‖f (x + y) - p.partialSum n y‖ ≤ C * (a * (‖y‖ / r')) ^ n :=
hf.uniform_geometric_approx' h
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC, fun y hy n => (hp y hy n).trans ?_⟩
have yr' : ‖y‖ < r' := by rwa [ball_zero_eq] at hy
have := ha.1.le -- needed to discharge a side goal on the next line
gcongr
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right ha.1.le (div_le_one_of_le yr'.le r'.coe_nonneg)
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.uniform_geometric_approx HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.uniform_geometric_approx
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.isBigO_sub_partialSum_pow (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) (n : ℕ) :
(fun y : E => f (x + y) - p.partialSum n y) =O[𝓝 0] fun y => ‖y‖ ^ n := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, hf⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hf.r_pos with ⟨r', r'0, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, C, -, hp⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ y ∈ Metric.ball (0 : E) r', ∀ n,
‖f (x + y) - p.partialSum n y‖ ≤ C * (a * (‖y‖ / r')) ^ n :=
hf.uniform_geometric_approx' h
refine isBigO_iff.2 ⟨C * (a / r') ^ n, ?_⟩
replace r'0 : 0 < (r' : ℝ) := mod_cast r'0
filter_upwards [Metric.ball_mem_nhds (0 : E) r'0] with y hy
simpa [mul_pow, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc, div_mul_eq_mul_div] using hp y hy n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_fpower_series_at.is_O_sub_partial_sum_pow HasFPowerSeriesAt.isBigO_sub_partialSum_pow
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.isBigO_image_sub_image_sub_deriv_principal
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (hr : r' < r) :
(fun y : E × E => f y.1 - f y.2 - p 1 fun _ => y.1 - y.2) =O[𝓟 (EMetric.ball (x, x) r')]
fun y => ‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖ := by
lift r' to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr
rcases (zero_le r').eq_or_lt with (rfl | hr'0)
· simp only [isBigO_bot, EMetric.ball_zero, principal_empty, ENNReal.coe_zero]
obtain ⟨a, ha, C, hC : 0 < C, hp⟩ :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r' : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n :=
p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (hr.trans_le hf.r_le)
simp only [← le_div_iff (pow_pos (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hr'0) _)] at hp
set L : E × E → ℝ := fun y =>
C * (a / r') ^ 2 * (‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖) * (a / (1 - a) ^ 2 + 2 / (1 - a))
have hL : ∀ y ∈ EMetric.ball (x, x) r', ‖f y.1 - f y.2 - p 1 fun _ => y.1 - y.2‖ ≤ L y := by
intro y hy'
have hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball x r ×ˢ EMetric.ball x r := by
rw [EMetric.ball_prod_same]
exact EMetric.ball_subset_ball hr.le hy'
set A : ℕ → F := fun n => (p n fun _ => y.1 - x) - p n fun _ => y.2 - x
have hA : HasSum (fun n => A (n + 2)) (f y.1 - f y.2 - p 1 fun _ => y.1 - y.2) := by
convert (hasSum_nat_add_iff' 2).2 ((hf.hasSum_sub hy.1).sub (hf.hasSum_sub hy.2)) using 1
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, Finset.sum_range_one, hf.coeff_zero, hf.coeff_zero, sub_self,
zero_add, ← Subsingleton.pi_single_eq (0 : Fin 1) (y.1 - x), Pi.single,
← Subsingleton.pi_single_eq (0 : Fin 1) (y.2 - x), Pi.single, ← (p 1).map_sub, ← Pi.single,
Subsingleton.pi_single_eq, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hy'
set B : ℕ → ℝ := fun n => C * (a / r') ^ 2 * (‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖) * ((n + 2) * a ^ n)
have hAB : ∀ n, ‖A (n + 2)‖ ≤ B n := fun n =>
calc
‖A (n + 2)‖ ≤ ‖p (n + 2)‖ * ↑(n + 2) * ‖y - (x, x)‖ ^ (n + 1) * ‖y.1 - y.2‖ := by
-- Porting note: `pi_norm_const` was `pi_norm_const (_ : E)`
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin, pi_norm_const, Prod.norm_def, Pi.sub_def,
Prod.fst_sub, Prod.snd_sub, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] using
(p <| n + 2).norm_image_sub_le (fun _ => y.1 - x) fun _ => y.2 - x
_ = ‖p (n + 2)‖ * ‖y - (x, x)‖ ^ n * (↑(n + 2) * ‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖) := by
rw [pow_succ ‖y - (x, x)‖]
ring
-- Porting note: the two `↑` in `↑r'` are new, without them, Lean fails to synthesize
-- instances `HDiv ℝ ℝ≥0 ?m` or `HMul ℝ ℝ≥0 ?m`
_ ≤ C * a ^ (n + 2) / ↑r' ^ (n + 2)
* ↑r' ^ n * (↑(n + 2) * ‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖) := by
have : 0 < a := ha.1
gcongr
· apply hp
· apply hy'.le
_ = B n := by
field_simp [B, pow_succ]
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
have hBL : HasSum B (L y) := by
apply HasSum.mul_left
simp only [add_mul]
have : ‖a‖ < 1 := by simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos ha.1, ha.2]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact (hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one this).add -- Porting note: was `convert`!
((hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one this).mul_left 2)
exact hA.norm_le_of_bounded hBL hAB
suffices L =O[𝓟 (EMetric.ball (x, x) r')] fun y => ‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖ by
refine (IsBigO.of_bound 1 (eventually_principal.2 fun y hy => ?_)).trans this
rw [one_mul]
exact (hL y hy).trans (le_abs_self _)
simp_rw [L, mul_right_comm _ (_ * _)]
exact (isBigO_refl _ _).const_mul_left _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.is_O_image_sub_image_sub_deriv_principal HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.isBigO_image_sub_image_sub_deriv_principal
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.image_sub_sub_deriv_le (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(hr : r' < r) :
∃ C, ∀ᵉ (y ∈ EMetric.ball x r') (z ∈ EMetric.ball x r'),
‖f y - f z - p 1 fun _ => y - z‖ ≤ C * max ‖y - x‖ ‖z - x‖ * ‖y - z‖ := by
simpa only [isBigO_principal, mul_assoc, norm_mul, norm_norm, Prod.forall, EMetric.mem_ball,
Prod.edist_eq, max_lt_iff, and_imp, @forall_swap (_ < _) E] using
hf.isBigO_image_sub_image_sub_deriv_principal hr
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.image_sub_sub_deriv_le HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.image_sub_sub_deriv_le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.isBigO_image_sub_norm_mul_norm_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
(fun y : E × E => f y.1 - f y.2 - p 1 fun _ => y.1 - y.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun y =>
‖y - (x, x)‖ * ‖y.1 - y.2‖ := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, hf⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hf.r_pos with ⟨r', r'0, h⟩
refine (hf.isBigO_image_sub_image_sub_deriv_principal h).mono ?_
exact le_principal_iff.2 (EMetric.ball_mem_nhds _ r'0)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align has_fpower_series_at.is_O_image_sub_norm_mul_norm_sub HasFPowerSeriesAt.isBigO_image_sub_norm_mul_norm_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoUniformlyOn {r' : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(h : (r' : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n y => p.partialSum n y) (fun y => f (x + y)) atTop
(Metric.ball (0 : E) r') := by
obtain ⟨a, ha, C, -, hp⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ y ∈ Metric.ball (0 : E) r', ∀ n,
‖f (x + y) - p.partialSum n y‖ ≤ C * a ^ n := hf.uniform_geometric_approx h
refine Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff.2 fun ε εpos => ?_
have L : Tendsto (fun n => (C : ℝ) * a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 ((C : ℝ) * 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2)
rw [mul_zero] at L
refine (L.eventually (gt_mem_nhds εpos)).mono fun n hn y hy => ?_
rw [dist_eq_norm]
exact (hp y hy n).trans_lt hn
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.tendsto_uniformly_on HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoUniformlyOn
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn (fun n y => p.partialSum n y) (fun y => f (x + y)) atTop
(EMetric.ball (0 : E) r) := by
intro u hu x hx
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hx with ⟨r', xr', hr'⟩
have : EMetric.ball (0 : E) r' ∈ 𝓝 x := IsOpen.mem_nhds EMetric.isOpen_ball xr'
refine ⟨EMetric.ball (0 : E) r', mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds this, ?_⟩
simpa [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal] using hf.tendstoUniformlyOn hr' u hu
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoUniformlyOn' {r' : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(h : (r' : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n y => p.partialSum n (y - x)) f atTop (Metric.ball (x : E) r') := by
convert (hf.tendstoUniformlyOn h).comp fun y => y - x using 1
· simp [(· ∘ ·)]
· ext z
simp [dist_eq_norm]
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.tendsto_uniformly_on' HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoUniformlyOn'
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn' (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn (fun n y => p.partialSum n (y - x)) f atTop
(EMetric.ball (x : E) r) := by
have A : ContinuousOn (fun y : E => y - x) (EMetric.ball (x : E) r) :=
(continuous_id.sub continuous_const).continuousOn
convert hf.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn.comp (fun y : E => y - x) _ A using 1
· ext z
simp
· intro z
simp [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub]
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.tendsto_locally_uniformly_on' HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn'
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
ContinuousOn f (EMetric.ball x r) :=
hf.tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn'.continuousOn <|
eventually_of_forall fun n =>
((p.partialSum_continuous n).comp (continuous_id.sub continuous_const)).continuousOn
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.continuous_on HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.continuousOn.continuousAt (EMetric.ball_mem_nhds x hr.r_pos)
#align has_fpower_series_at.continuous_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt
protected theorem AnalyticAt.continuousAt (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
let ⟨_, hp⟩ := hf
hp.continuousAt
#align analytic_at.continuous_at AnalyticAt.continuousAt
protected theorem AnalyticOn.continuousOn {s : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align analytic_on.continuous_on AnalyticOn.continuousOn
theorem AnalyticOn.continuous {f : E → F} (fa : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f univ) : Continuous f := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact fa.continuousOn
protected theorem FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall [CompleteSpace F]
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (h : 0 < p.radius) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall p.sum p 0 p.radius :=
{ r_le := le_rfl
r_pos := h
hasSum := fun hy => by
rw [zero_add]
exact p.hasSum hy }
#align formal_multilinear_series.has_fpower_series_on_ball FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.sum (h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r) : f (x + y) = p.sum y :=
(h.hasSum hy).tsum_eq.symm
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.sum HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.sum
protected theorem FormalMultilinearSeries.continuousOn [CompleteSpace F] :
ContinuousOn p.sum (EMetric.ball 0 p.radius) := by
rcases (zero_le p.radius).eq_or_lt with h | h
· simp [← h, continuousOn_empty]
· exact (p.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall h).continuousOn
#align formal_multilinear_series.continuous_on FormalMultilinearSeries.continuousOn
end
section Uniqueness
open ContinuousMultilinearMap
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 949 | 998 | theorem Asymptotics.IsBigO.continuousMultilinearMap_apply_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : E[×n]→L[𝕜] F}
(h : (fun y => p fun _ => y) =O[𝓝 0] fun y => ‖y‖ ^ (n + 1)) (y : E) : (p fun _ => y) = 0 := by |
obtain ⟨c, c_pos, hc⟩ := h.exists_pos
obtain ⟨t, ht, t_open, z_mem⟩ := eventually_nhds_iff.mp (isBigOWith_iff.mp hc)
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, δε⟩ := (Metric.isOpen_iff.mp t_open) 0 z_mem
clear h hc z_mem
cases' n with n
· exact norm_eq_zero.mp (by
-- Porting note: the symmetric difference of the `simpa only` sets:
-- added `Nat.zero_eq, zero_add, pow_one`
-- removed `zero_pow, Ne.def, Nat.one_ne_zero, not_false_iff`
simpa only [Nat.zero_eq, fin0_apply_norm, norm_eq_zero, norm_zero, zero_add, pow_one,
mul_zero, norm_le_zero_iff] using ht 0 (δε (Metric.mem_ball_self δ_pos)))
· refine Or.elim (Classical.em (y = 0))
(fun hy => by simpa only [hy] using p.map_zero) fun hy => ?_
replace hy := norm_pos_iff.mpr hy
refine norm_eq_zero.mp (le_antisymm (le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε ε_pos => ?_) (norm_nonneg _))
have h₀ := _root_.mul_pos c_pos (pow_pos hy (n.succ + 1))
obtain ⟨k, k_pos, k_norm⟩ := NormedField.exists_norm_lt 𝕜
(lt_min (mul_pos δ_pos (inv_pos.mpr hy)) (mul_pos ε_pos (inv_pos.mpr h₀)))
have h₁ : ‖k • y‖ < δ := by
rw [norm_smul]
exact inv_mul_cancel_right₀ hy.ne.symm δ ▸
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (lt_of_lt_of_le k_norm (min_le_left _ _)) hy
have h₂ :=
calc
‖p fun _ => k • y‖ ≤ c * ‖k • y‖ ^ (n.succ + 1) := by
-- Porting note: now Lean wants `_root_.`
simpa only [norm_pow, _root_.norm_norm] using ht (k • y) (δε (mem_ball_zero_iff.mpr h₁))
--simpa only [norm_pow, norm_norm] using ht (k • y) (δε (mem_ball_zero_iff.mpr h₁))
_ = ‖k‖ ^ n.succ * (‖k‖ * (c * ‖y‖ ^ (n.succ + 1))) := by
-- Porting note: added `Nat.succ_eq_add_one` since otherwise `ring` does not conclude.
simp only [norm_smul, mul_pow, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
-- Porting note: removed `rw [pow_succ]`, since it now becomes superfluous.
ring
have h₃ : ‖k‖ * (c * ‖y‖ ^ (n.succ + 1)) < ε :=
inv_mul_cancel_right₀ h₀.ne.symm ε ▸
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (lt_of_lt_of_le k_norm (min_le_right _ _)) h₀
calc
‖p fun _ => y‖ = ‖k⁻¹ ^ n.succ‖ * ‖p fun _ => k • y‖ := by
simpa only [inv_smul_smul₀ (norm_pos_iff.mp k_pos), norm_smul, Finset.prod_const,
Finset.card_fin] using
congr_arg norm (p.map_smul_univ (fun _ : Fin n.succ => k⁻¹) fun _ : Fin n.succ => k • y)
_ ≤ ‖k⁻¹ ^ n.succ‖ * (‖k‖ ^ n.succ * (‖k‖ * (c * ‖y‖ ^ (n.succ + 1)))) := by gcongr
_ = ‖(k⁻¹ * k) ^ n.succ‖ * (‖k‖ * (c * ‖y‖ ^ (n.succ + 1))) := by
rw [← mul_assoc]
simp [norm_mul, mul_pow]
_ ≤ 0 + ε := by
rw [inv_mul_cancel (norm_pos_iff.mp k_pos)]
simpa using h₃.le
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
#align_import geometry.euclidean.circumcenter from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
def circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : Sphere P :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere Affine.Simplex.circumsphere
theorem circumsphere_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumsphere.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧
Set.range s.points ⊆ s.circumsphere) ∧
∀ cs : Sphere P,
cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧ Set.range s.points ⊆ cs →
cs = s.circumsphere :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose_spec
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumsphere.center
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter Affine.Simplex.circumcenter
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumsphere.radius
#align affine.simplex.circumradius Affine.Simplex.circumradius
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_center {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.center = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_center Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_center
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_radius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.radius = s.circumradius :=
rfl
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_radius Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_radius
theorem circumcenter_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_mem_affine_span Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere (Set.mem_range_self _) s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
#align affine.simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius Affine.Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
theorem mem_circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i ∈ s.circumsphere :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius i
#align affine.simplex.mem_circumsphere Affine.Simplex.mem_circumsphere
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius := by
intro i
rw [dist_comm]
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
#align affine.simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' Affine.Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius'
theorem eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.1
#align affine.simplex.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
theorem eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and_iff] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and_iff] at h
exact h.2
#align affine.simplex.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq
theorem circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
#align affine.simplex.circumradius_nonneg Affine.Simplex.circumradius_nonneg
theorem circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg ?_
intro h
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
simp_rw [← h, dist_eq_zero] at hr
have h01 := s.independent.injective.ne (by simp : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1)
simp [hr] at h01
#align affine.simplex.circumradius_pos Affine.Simplex.circumradius_pos
theorem circumcenter_eq_point (s : Simplex ℝ P 0) (i : Fin 1) : s.circumcenter = s.points i := by
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have : Unique (Fin 1) := ⟨⟨0, by decide⟩, fun a => by simp only [Fin.eq_zero]⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton] at h
rw [h]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_eq_point Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_eq_point
theorem circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : Simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points := by
have hr :
Set.Pairwise Set.univ fun i j : Fin 2 =>
dist (s.points i) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) := by
intro i hi j hj hij
rw [Finset.centroid_pair_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←
one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ← one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [-one_smul, ← sub_smul] <;> norm_num
rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at hr
cases' hr with r hr
exact
(s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (Finset.card_fin 2)) fun i =>
hr i (Set.mem_univ _)).symm
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_eq_centroid Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_eq_centroid
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumsphere = s.circumsphere := by
refine s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 _ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [← s.reindex_range_points e]
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
#align affine.simplex.circumsphere_reindex Affine.Simplex.circumsphere_reindex
@[simp]
theorem circumcenter_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumcenter = s.circumcenter := by simp_rw [circumcenter, circumsphere_reindex]
#align affine.simplex.circumcenter_reindex Affine.Simplex.circumcenter_reindex
@[simp]
theorem circumradius_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumradius = s.circumradius := by simp_rw [circumradius, circumsphere_reindex]
#align affine.simplex.circumradius_reindex Affine.Simplex.circumradius_reindex
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
def orthogonalProjectionSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
P →ᵃ[ℝ] affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
orthogonalProjection (affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points))
#align affine.simplex.orthogonal_projection_span Affine.Simplex.orthogonalProjectionSpan
theorem orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
{p1 : P} (p2 : P) (r : ℝ) (hp : p1 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
s.orthogonalProjectionSpan (r • (p2 -ᵥ s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2 : V) +ᵥ p1) = ⟨p1, hp⟩ :=
EuclideanGeometry.orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ _
#align affine.simplex.orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection Affine.Simplex.orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection
theorem coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection {n : ℕ} {r₁ : ℝ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p p₁o : P} (hp₁o : p₁o ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan (r₁ • (p -ᵥ ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p)) +ᵥ p₁o)) = p₁o :=
congrArg ((↑) : _ → P) (orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ _ hp₁o)
#align affine.simplex.coe_orthogonal_projection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonal_projection Affine.Simplex.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection
theorem dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p1 : P} (p2 : P) (hp1 : p1 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p1 p2 * dist p1 p2 =
dist p1 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) * dist p1 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) +
dist p2 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) * dist p2 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) := by
rw [PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm p2 _, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 _, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p1 _,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p2, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p1 (s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p2) p2,
norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero]
exact
Submodule.inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal (vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction p2 hp1)
(orthogonalProjection_vsub_mem_direction_orthogonal _ p2)
#align affine.simplex.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq_add_dist_orthogonal_projection_sq Affine.Simplex.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq
theorem dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p₁ : P}
(h₁ : ∀ i : Fin (n + 1), dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₁' : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = s.circumcenter)
(h : s.points 0 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius := by
rw [dist_comm, ← h₁ 0,
s.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p₁ h]
simp only [h₁', dist_comm p₁, add_sub_cancel_left, Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius]
#align affine.simplex.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius Affine.Simplex.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter := by
change ∃ r : ℝ, ∀ i, (fun x => dist x p = r) (s.points i) at hr
have hr : ∃ (r : ℝ), ∀ (a : P),
a ∈ Set.range (fun (i : Fin (n + 1)) => s.points i) → dist a p = r := by
cases' hr with r hr
use r
refine Set.forall_mem_range.mpr ?_
exact hr
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) p] at hr
cases' hr with r hr
exact
s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq (orthogonalProjection_mem p) fun i => hr _ (Set.mem_range_self i)
#align affine.simplex.orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P} {r : ℝ}
(hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter :=
s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq ⟨r, hr⟩
#align affine.simplex.orthogonal_projection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq Affine.Simplex.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Circumcenter.lean | 487 | 493 | theorem orthogonalProjection_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))}
{m : ℕ} (h : fs.card = m + 1) :
↑((s.face h).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) = (s.face h).circumcenter :=
haveI hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist ((s.face h).points i) s.circumcenter = r := by |
use s.circumradius
simp [face_points]
orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq _ hr
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e00d81bdcbf77c8188bbd18f5524ddc3ed8cac6"
namespace Nat
--@[pp_nodot] porting note: unknown attribute
def log (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b then log b (n / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : n / b < n := div_lt_self ((Nat.zero_lt_one.trans h.2).trans_le h.1) h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.log Nat.log
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 0 ↔ n < b ∨ b ≤ 1 := by
rw [log, dite_eq_right_iff]
simp only [Nat.add_eq_zero_iff, Nat.one_ne_zero, and_false, imp_false, not_and_or, not_le, not_lt]
#align nat.log_eq_zero_iff Nat.log_eq_zero_iff
theorem log_of_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : n < b) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl hb)
#align nat.log_of_lt Nat.log_of_lt
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inr hb)
#align nat.log_of_left_le_one Nat.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_pos_iff {b n : ℕ} : 0 < log b n ↔ b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b := by
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, log_eq_zero_iff, not_or, not_lt, not_le]
#align nat.log_pos_iff Nat.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hbn : b ≤ n) : 0 < log b n :=
log_pos_iff.2 ⟨hbn, hb⟩
#align nat.log_pos Nat.log_pos
theorem log_of_one_lt_of_le {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (hn : b ≤ n) : log b n = log b (n / b) + 1 := by
rw [log]
exact if_pos ⟨hn, h⟩
#align nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le Nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le
@[simp] lemma log_zero_left : ∀ n, log 0 n = 0 := log_of_left_le_one $ Nat.zero_le _
#align nat.log_zero_left Nat.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b 0 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (le_total 1 b)
#align nat.log_zero_right Nat.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ n, log 1 n = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align nat.log_one_left Nat.log_one_left
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b 1 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (lt_or_le _ _)
#align nat.log_one_right Nat.log_one_right
theorem pow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
b ^ x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ log b y := by
induction' y using Nat.strong_induction_on with y ih generalizing x
cases x with
| zero => dsimp; omega
| succ x =>
rw [log]; split_ifs with h
· have b_pos : 0 < b := lt_of_succ_lt hb
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih (y / b) (div_lt_self
(Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hy) hb) (Nat.div_pos h.1 b_pos).ne', le_div_iff_mul_le b_pos,
pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm]
· exact iff_of_false (fun hby => h ⟨(le_self_pow x.succ_ne_zero _).trans hby, hb⟩)
(not_succ_le_zero _)
#align nat.pow_le_iff_le_log Nat.pow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_pow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x ↔ log b y < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy)
#align nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt
theorem pow_le_of_le_log {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (h : x ≤ log b y) : b ^ x ≤ y := by
refine (le_or_lt b 1).elim (fun hb => ?_) fun hb => (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).2 h
rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.le_zero] at h
rwa [h, Nat.pow_zero, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.pow_le_of_le_log Nat.pow_le_of_le_log
theorem le_log_of_pow_le {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ x ≤ y) : x ≤ log b y := by
rcases ne_or_eq y 0 with (hy | rfl)
exacts [(pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).1 h, (h.not_lt (Nat.pow_pos (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb))).elim]
#align nat.le_log_of_pow_le Nat.le_log_of_pow_le
theorem pow_log_le_self (b : ℕ) {x : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
pow_le_of_le_log hx le_rfl
#align nat.pow_log_le_self Nat.pow_log_le_self
theorem log_lt_of_lt_pow {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x → log b y < x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_le_of_le_log hy)
#align nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow Nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow
theorem lt_pow_of_log_lt {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : log b y < x → y < b ^ x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (le_log_of_pow_le hb)
#align nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt
theorem lt_pow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x < b ^ (log b x).succ :=
lt_pow_of_log_lt hb (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self
theorem log_eq_iff {b m n : ℕ} (h : m ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) :
log b n = m ↔ b ^ m ≤ n ∧ n < b ^ (m + 1) := by
rcases em (1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) with (⟨hb, hn⟩ | hbn)
· rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← pow_le_iff_le_log, ← lt_pow_iff_log_lt, and_comm] <;>
assumption
have hm : m ≠ 0 := h.resolve_right hbn
rw [not_and_or, not_lt, Ne, not_not] at hbn
rcases hbn with (hb | rfl)
· obtain rfl | rfl := le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 hb
any_goals
simp only [ne_eq, zero_eq, reduceSucc, lt_self_iff_false, not_lt_zero, false_and, or_false]
at h
simp [h, eq_comm (a := 0), Nat.zero_pow (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 _)] <;> omega
· simp [@eq_comm _ 0, hm]
#align nat.log_eq_iff Nat.log_eq_iff
theorem log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow {b m n : ℕ} (h₁ : b ^ m ≤ n) (h₂ : n < b ^ (m + 1)) :
log b n = m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· rw [Nat.pow_one] at h₂
exact log_of_lt h₂
· exact (log_eq_iff (Or.inl hm)).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow Nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow
theorem log_pow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : log b (b ^ x) = x :=
log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow le_rfl (Nat.pow_lt_pow_right hb x.lt_succ_self)
#align nat.log_pow Nat.log_pow
theorem log_eq_one_iff' {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ b ≤ n ∧ n < b * b := by
rw [log_eq_iff (Or.inl Nat.one_ne_zero), Nat.pow_add, Nat.pow_one]
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff' Nat.log_eq_one_iff'
theorem log_eq_one_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ n < b * b ∧ 1 < b ∧ b ≤ n :=
log_eq_one_iff'.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, lt_mul_self_iff.1 (h.1.trans_lt h.2), h.1⟩, fun h => ⟨h.2.2, h.1⟩⟩
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff Nat.log_eq_one_iff
theorem log_mul_base {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : log b (n * b) = log b n + 1 := by
apply log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow <;> rw [pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm b]
exacts [Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (pow_log_le_self _ hn),
(Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb)).2 (lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _)]
#align nat.log_mul_base Nat.log_mul_base
theorem pow_log_le_add_one (b : ℕ) : ∀ x, b ^ log b x ≤ x + 1
| 0 => by rw [log_zero_right, Nat.pow_zero]
| x + 1 => (pow_log_le_self b x.succ_ne_zero).trans (x + 1).le_succ
#align nat.pow_log_le_add_one Nat.pow_log_le_add_one
theorem log_monotone {b : ℕ} : Monotone (log b) := by
refine monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => ?_
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
· exact le_log_of_pow_le hb (pow_log_le_add_one _ _)
#align nat.log_monotone Nat.log_monotone
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : log b n ≤ log b m :=
log_monotone h
#align nat.log_mono_right Nat.log_mono_right
@[mono]
theorem log_anti_left {b c n : ℕ} (hc : 1 < c) (hb : c ≤ b) : log b n ≤ log c n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · rw [log_zero_right, log_zero_right]
apply le_log_of_pow_le hc
calc
c ^ log b n ≤ b ^ log b n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hb _
_ ≤ n := pow_log_le_self _ hn
#align nat.log_anti_left Nat.log_anti_left
theorem log_antitone_left {n : ℕ} : AntitoneOn (fun b => log b n) (Set.Ioi 1) := fun _ hc _ _ hb =>
log_anti_left (Set.mem_Iio.1 hc) hb
#align nat.log_antitone_left Nat.log_antitone_left
@[simp]
theorem log_div_base (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b) = log b n - 1 := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.zero_sub]
cases' lt_or_le n b with h h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, log_of_lt h, log_zero_right]
rw [log_of_one_lt_of_le hb h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align nat.log_div_base Nat.log_div_base
@[simp]
theorem log_div_mul_self (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b * b) = log b n := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb]
cases' lt_or_le n b with h h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, Nat.zero_mul, log_zero_right, log_of_lt h]
rw [log_mul_base hb (Nat.div_pos h (by omega)).ne', log_div_base,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_iff.2 <| log_pos hb h)]
#align nat.log_div_mul_self Nat.log_div_mul_self
theorem add_pred_div_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : (n + b - 1) / b < n := by
rw [div_lt_iff_lt_mul (by omega), ← succ_le_iff, ← pred_eq_sub_one,
succ_pred_eq_of_pos (by omega)]
exact Nat.add_le_mul hn hb
-- Porting note: Was private in mathlib 3
-- #align nat.add_pred_div_lt Nat.add_pred_div_lt
--@[pp_nodot]
def clog (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n then clog b ((n + b - 1) / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : (n + b - 1) / b < n := add_pred_div_lt h.1 h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.clog Nat.clog
theorem clog_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : clog b n = 0 := by
rw [clog, dif_neg fun h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n => h.1.not_le hb]
#align nat.clog_of_left_le_one Nat.clog_of_left_le_one
theorem clog_of_right_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ 1) (b : ℕ) : clog b n = 0 := by
rw [clog, dif_neg fun h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n => h.2.not_le hn]
#align nat.clog_of_right_le_one Nat.clog_of_right_le_one
@[simp] lemma clog_zero_left (n : ℕ) : clog 0 n = 0 := clog_of_left_le_one (Nat.zero_le _) _
#align nat.clog_zero_left Nat.clog_zero_left
@[simp] lemma clog_zero_right (b : ℕ) : clog b 0 = 0 := clog_of_right_le_one (Nat.zero_le _) _
#align nat.clog_zero_right Nat.clog_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_left (n : ℕ) : clog 1 n = 0 :=
clog_of_left_le_one le_rfl _
#align nat.clog_one_left Nat.clog_one_left
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_right (b : ℕ) : clog b 1 = 0 :=
clog_of_right_le_one le_rfl _
#align nat.clog_one_right Nat.clog_one_right
theorem clog_of_two_le {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
clog b n = clog b ((n + b - 1) / b) + 1 := by rw [clog, dif_pos (⟨hb, hn⟩ : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n)]
#align nat.clog_of_two_le Nat.clog_of_two_le
theorem clog_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : 0 < clog b n := by
rw [clog_of_two_le hb hn]
exact zero_lt_succ _
#align nat.clog_pos Nat.clog_pos
theorem clog_eq_one {b n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) (h : n ≤ b) : clog b n = 1 := by
rw [clog_of_two_le (hn.trans h) hn, clog_of_right_le_one]
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul] <;> omega
#align nat.clog_eq_one Nat.clog_eq_one
theorem le_pow_iff_clog_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} : x ≤ b ^ y ↔ clog b x ≤ y := by
induction' x using Nat.strong_induction_on with x ih generalizing y
cases y
· rw [Nat.pow_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => (clog_of_right_le_one h b).le, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← not_lt]
contrapose!
exact clog_pos hb
have b_pos : 0 < b := zero_lt_of_lt hb
rw [clog]; split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih ((x + b - 1) / b) (add_pred_div_lt hb h.2),
Nat.div_le_iff_le_mul_add_pred b_pos, Nat.mul_comm b, ← Nat.pow_succ,
Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.succ_le_of_lt b_pos), Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
· exact iff_of_true ((not_lt.1 (not_and.1 h hb)).trans <| succ_le_of_lt <| Nat.pow_pos b_pos)
(zero_le _)
#align nat.le_pow_iff_clog_le Nat.le_pow_iff_clog_le
theorem pow_lt_iff_lt_clog {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} : b ^ y < x ↔ y < clog b x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_pow_iff_clog_le hb)
#align nat.pow_lt_iff_lt_clog Nat.pow_lt_iff_lt_clog
theorem clog_pow (b x : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) : clog b (b ^ x) = x :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z ↦ by rw [← le_pow_iff_clog_le hb, Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right hb]
#align nat.clog_pow Nat.clog_pow
theorem pow_pred_clog_lt_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℕ} (hx : 1 < x) :
b ^ (clog b x).pred < x := by
rw [← not_le, le_pow_iff_clog_le hb, not_le]
exact pred_lt (clog_pos hb hx).ne'
#align nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self Nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self
theorem le_pow_clog {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x ≤ b ^ clog b x :=
(le_pow_iff_clog_le hb).2 le_rfl
#align nat.le_pow_clog Nat.le_pow_clog
@[mono]
theorem clog_mono_right (b : ℕ) {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : clog b n ≤ clog b m := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [clog_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
· rw [← le_pow_iff_clog_le hb]
exact h.trans (le_pow_clog hb _)
#align nat.clog_mono_right Nat.clog_mono_right
@[mono]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Log.lean | 335 | 339 | theorem clog_anti_left {b c n : ℕ} (hc : 1 < c) (hb : c ≤ b) : clog b n ≤ clog c n := by |
rw [← le_pow_iff_clog_le (lt_of_lt_of_le hc hb)]
calc
n ≤ c ^ clog c n := le_pow_clog hc _
_ ≤ b ^ clog c n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hb _
|
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
#align nat.Inf_def Nat.sInf_def
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
#align nat.Sup_def Nat.sSup_def
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
#align set.infinite.nat.Sup_eq_zero Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, iff_true_iff, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false_iff, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
#align nat.Inf_eq_zero Nat.sInf_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = 0 := by
rw [sInf_eq_zero]
right
rfl
#align nat.Inf_empty Nat.sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInf_of_empty {ι : Sort*} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℕ) : iInf f = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
#align nat.infi_of_empty Nat.iInf_of_empty
@[simp]
lemma iInf_const_zero {ι : Sort*} : ⨅ i : ι, 0 = 0 :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty ι).elim (fun h ↦ by simp) fun h ↦ sInf_eq_zero.2 <| by simp
theorem sInf_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s := by
rw [Nat.sInf_def h]
exact Nat.find_spec h
#align nat.Inf_mem Nat.sInf_mem
theorem not_mem_of_lt_sInf {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m < sInf s) : m ∉ s := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h; apply not_mem_empty
| inr h => rw [Nat.sInf_def h] at hm; exact Nat.find_min h hm
#align nat.not_mem_of_lt_Inf Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf
protected theorem sInf_le {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ m := by
rw [Nat.sInf_def ⟨m, hm⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨m, hm⟩ hm
#align nat.Inf_le Nat.sInf_le
theorem nonempty_of_pos_sInf {s : Set ℕ} (h : 0 < sInf s) : s.Nonempty := by
by_contra contra
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at contra
have h' : sInf s ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h
apply h'
rw [Nat.sInf_eq_zero]
right
assumption
#align nat.nonempty_of_pos_Inf Nat.nonempty_of_pos_sInf
theorem nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ {s : Set ℕ} {k : ℕ} (h : sInf s = k + 1) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_pos_sInf (h.symm ▸ succ_pos k : sInf s > 0)
#align nat.nonempty_of_Inf_eq_succ Nat.nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ
theorem eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed {s : Set ℕ} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hs' : ∀ k₁ k₂ : ℕ, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s) : s = Ici (sInf s) :=
ext fun n ↦ ⟨fun H ↦ Nat.sInf_le H, fun H ↦ hs' (sInf s) n H (sInf_mem hs)⟩
#align nat.eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed Nat.eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 110 | 120 | theorem sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff {s : Set ℕ} (hs : ∀ k₁ k₂ : ℕ, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s)
(k : ℕ) : sInf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s := by |
constructor
· intro H
rw [eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed (nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ _) hs, H, mem_Ici, mem_Ici]
· exact ⟨le_rfl, k.not_succ_le_self⟩;
· exact k
· assumption
· rintro ⟨H, H'⟩
rw [sInf_def (⟨_, H⟩ : s.Nonempty), find_eq_iff]
exact ⟨H, fun n hnk hns ↦ H' <| hs n k (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp hnk) hns⟩
|
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
import Batteries.Data.List.Init.Attach
import Batteries.Data.List.Pairwise
-- Adaptation note: nightly-2024-03-18. We should be able to remove this after nightly-2024-03-19.
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Rfl
open Nat
namespace List
open Perm (swap)
@[simp, refl] protected theorem Perm.refl : ∀ l : List α, l ~ l
| [] => .nil
| x :: xs => (Perm.refl xs).cons x
protected theorem Perm.rfl {l : List α} : l ~ l := .refl _
theorem Perm.of_eq (h : l₁ = l₂) : l₁ ~ l₂ := h ▸ .rfl
protected theorem Perm.symm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₂ ~ l₁ := by
induction h with
| nil => exact nil
| cons _ _ ih => exact cons _ ih
| swap => exact swap ..
| trans _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => exact trans ih₂ ih₁
theorem perm_comm {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ~ l₂ ↔ l₂ ~ l₁ := ⟨Perm.symm, Perm.symm⟩
theorem Perm.swap' (x y : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : y :: x :: l₁ ~ x :: y :: l₂ :=
(swap ..).trans <| p.cons _ |>.cons _
@[elab_as_elim] theorem Perm.recOnSwap'
{motive : (l₁ : List α) → (l₂ : List α) → l₁ ~ l₂ → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
(nil : motive [] [] .nil)
(cons : ∀ x {l₁ l₂}, (h : l₁ ~ l₂) → motive l₁ l₂ h → motive (x :: l₁) (x :: l₂) (.cons x h))
(swap' : ∀ x y {l₁ l₂}, (h : l₁ ~ l₂) → motive l₁ l₂ h →
motive (y :: x :: l₁) (x :: y :: l₂) (.swap' _ _ h))
(trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃}, (h₁ : l₁ ~ l₂) → (h₂ : l₂ ~ l₃) → motive l₁ l₂ h₁ → motive l₂ l₃ h₂ →
motive l₁ l₃ (.trans h₁ h₂)) : motive l₁ l₂ p :=
have motive_refl l : motive l l (.refl l) :=
List.recOn l nil fun x xs ih => cons x (.refl xs) ih
Perm.recOn p nil cons (fun x y l => swap' x y (.refl l) (motive_refl l)) trans
theorem Perm.eqv (α) : Equivalence (@Perm α) := ⟨.refl, .symm, .trans⟩
instance isSetoid (α) : Setoid (List α) := .mk Perm (Perm.eqv α)
theorem Perm.mem_iff {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂ := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [mem_cons, ih]
| swap => simp only [mem_cons, or_left_comm]
| trans _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => simp only [ih₁, ih₂]
theorem Perm.subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ := fun _ => p.mem_iff.mp
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Perm.lean | 78 | 83 | theorem Perm.append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} (t₁ : List α) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : l₁ ++ t₁ ~ l₂ ++ t₁ := by |
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => exact cons _ ih
| swap => exact swap ..
| trans _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => exact trans ih₁ ih₂
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
#align_import field_theory.minpoly.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df0098f0db291900600f32070f6abb3e178be2ba"
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial Set Function
variable {A B B' : Type*}
namespace minpoly
section Ring
variable [CommRing A] [Ring B] [Ring B'] [Algebra A B] [Algebra A B']
variable {x : B}
theorem monic (hx : IsIntegral A x) : Monic (minpoly A x) := by
delta minpoly
rw [dif_pos hx]
exact (degree_lt_wf.min_mem _ hx).1
#align minpoly.monic minpoly.monic
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial A] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : minpoly A x ≠ 0 :=
(monic hx).ne_zero
#align minpoly.ne_zero minpoly.ne_zero
theorem eq_zero (hx : ¬IsIntegral A x) : minpoly A x = 0 :=
dif_neg hx
#align minpoly.eq_zero minpoly.eq_zero
theorem algHom_eq (f : B →ₐ[A] B') (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : B) :
minpoly A (f x) = minpoly A x := by
refine dif_ctx_congr (isIntegral_algHom_iff _ hf) (fun _ => ?_) fun _ => rfl
simp_rw [← Polynomial.aeval_def, aeval_algHom, AlgHom.comp_apply, _root_.map_eq_zero_iff f hf]
#align minpoly.minpoly_alg_hom minpoly.algHom_eq
theorem algebraMap_eq {B} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [Algebra B B'] [IsScalarTower A B B']
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B B')) (x : B) :
minpoly A (algebraMap B B' x) = minpoly A x :=
algHom_eq (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B B') h x
@[simp]
theorem algEquiv_eq (f : B ≃ₐ[A] B') (x : B) : minpoly A (f x) = minpoly A x :=
algHom_eq (f : B →ₐ[A] B') f.injective x
#align minpoly.minpoly_alg_equiv minpoly.algEquiv_eq
variable (A x)
@[simp]
theorem aeval : aeval x (minpoly A x) = 0 := by
delta minpoly
split_ifs with hx
· exact (degree_lt_wf.min_mem _ hx).2
· exact aeval_zero _
#align minpoly.aeval minpoly.aeval
@[simp]
theorem aeval_algHom (f : B →ₐ[A] B') (x : B) : (Polynomial.aeval (f x)) (minpoly A x) = 0 := by
rw [Polynomial.aeval_algHom, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval, map_zero]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/Basic.lean | 100 | 103 | theorem ne_one [Nontrivial B] : minpoly A x ≠ 1 := by |
intro h
refine (one_ne_zero : (1 : B) ≠ 0) ?_
simpa using congr_arg (Polynomial.aeval x) h
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.EqualizerSheafCondition
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
def IsSheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike in
def IsSeparated (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) [ConcreteCategory A] : Prop :=
∀ (X : C) (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ J X) (x y : P.obj (op X)),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : S f), P.map f.op x = P.map f.op y) → x = y
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable (A : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} A]
structure Sheaf where
val : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A
cond : Presheaf.IsSheaf J val
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Sheaf CategoryTheory.Sheaf
@[simps]
def sheafToPresheaf : Sheaf J A ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A where
obj := Sheaf.val
map f := f.val
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Sheaf_to_presheaf CategoryTheory.sheafToPresheaf
abbrev sheafSections : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Sheaf J A ⥤ A := (sheafToPresheaf J A).flip
@[simps]
def fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf : (sheafToPresheaf J A).FullyFaithful where
preimage f := ⟨f⟩
variable {J A} in
abbrev Sheaf.homEquiv {X Y : Sheaf J A} : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X.val ⟶ Y.val) :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).homEquiv
instance : (sheafToPresheaf J A).Full :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).full
instance : (sheafToPresheaf J A).Faithful :=
(fullyFaithfulSheafToPresheaf J A).faithful
theorem Sheaf.Hom.mono_of_presheaf_mono {F G : Sheaf J A} (f : F ⟶ G) [h : Mono f.1] : Mono f :=
(sheafToPresheaf J A).mono_of_mono_map h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Sheaf.hom.mono_of_presheaf_mono CategoryTheory.Sheaf.Hom.mono_of_presheaf_mono
instance Sheaf.Hom.epi_of_presheaf_epi {F G : Sheaf J A} (f : F ⟶ G) [h : Epi f.1] : Epi f :=
(sheafToPresheaf J A).epi_of_epi_map h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Sheaf.hom.epi_of_presheaf_epi CategoryTheory.Sheaf.Hom.epi_of_presheaf_epi
@[simps]
def sheafOver {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {J : GrothendieckTopology C} (ℱ : Sheaf J A) (E : A) :
SheafOfTypes J :=
⟨ℱ.val ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E), ℱ.cond E⟩
#align category_theory.sheaf_over CategoryTheory.sheafOver
theorem isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) :
Presheaf.IsSheaf J P ↔ Presieve.IsSheaf J P := by
constructor
· intro hP
refine Presieve.isSheaf_iso J ?_ (hP PUnit)
exact isoWhiskerLeft _ Coyoneda.punitIso ≪≫ P.rightUnitor
· intro hP X Y S hS z hz
refine ⟨fun x => (hP S hS).amalgamate (fun Z f hf => z f hf x) ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ h
exact congr_fun (hz g₁ g₂ hf₁ hf₂ h) x
· intro Z f hf
funext x
apply Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue
· intro y hy
funext x
apply (hP S hS).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Y' f hf
rw [Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ hf, ← hy _ hf]
rfl
#align category_theory.is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf_of_type CategoryTheory.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type
variable {J} in
lemma Presheaf.IsSheaf.isSheafFor {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P)
{X : C} (S : Sieve X) (hS : S ∈ J X) : Presieve.IsSheafFor P S.arrows := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type] at hP
exact hP S hS
@[simps]
def sheafEquivSheafOfTypes : Sheaf J (Type w) ≌ SheafOfTypes J where
functor :=
{ obj := fun S => ⟨S.val, (isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type _ _).1 S.2⟩
map := fun f => ⟨f.val⟩ }
inverse :=
{ obj := fun S => ⟨S.val, (isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type _ _).2 S.2⟩
map := fun f => ⟨f.val⟩ }
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Iso.refl _
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Iso.refl _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Sheaf_equiv_SheafOfTypes CategoryTheory.sheafEquivSheafOfTypes
instance : Inhabited (Sheaf (⊥ : GrothendieckTopology C) (Type w)) :=
⟨(sheafEquivSheafOfTypes _).inverse.obj default⟩
variable {J} {A}
def Sheaf.isTerminalOfBotCover (F : Sheaf J A) (X : C) (H : ⊥ ∈ J X) :
IsTerminal (F.1.obj (op X)) := by
refine @IsTerminal.ofUnique _ _ _ ?_
intro Y
choose t h using F.2 Y _ H (by tauto) (by tauto)
exact ⟨⟨t⟩, fun a => h.2 a (by tauto)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.Sheaf.is_terminal_of_bot_cover CategoryTheory.Sheaf.isTerminalOfBotCover
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
-- Under here is the equalizer story, which is equivalent if A has products (and doesn't
-- make sense otherwise). It's described in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL,
-- between 00VQ and 00VR.
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
-- `A` is a general category; `A'` is a variant where the morphisms live in a large enough
-- universe to guarantee that we can take limits in A of things coming from C.
-- I would have liked to use something like `UnivLE.{max v₁ u₁, v₂}` as a hypothesis on
-- `A`'s morphism universe rather than introducing `A'` but I can't get it to work.
-- So, for now, results which need max v₁ u₁ ≤ v₂ are just stated for `A'` and `P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A'`
-- instead.
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable {A' : Type u₂} [Category.{max v₁ u₁} A']
variable {B : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} B]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {U : C} (R : Presieve U)
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) (P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A')
section
variable [HasProducts.{max u₁ v₁} A]
variable [HasProducts.{max u₁ v₁} A']
def firstObj : A :=
∏ᶜ fun f : ΣV, { f : V ⟶ U // R f } => P.obj (op f.1)
#align category_theory.presheaf.first_obj CategoryTheory.Presheaf.firstObj
def forkMap : P.obj (op U) ⟶ firstObj R P :=
Pi.lift fun f => P.map f.2.1.op
#align category_theory.presheaf.fork_map CategoryTheory.Presheaf.forkMap
variable [HasPullbacks C]
def secondObj : A :=
∏ᶜ fun fg : (ΣV, { f : V ⟶ U // R f }) × ΣW, { g : W ⟶ U // R g } =>
P.obj (op (pullback fg.1.2.1 fg.2.2.1))
#align category_theory.presheaf.second_obj CategoryTheory.Presheaf.secondObj
def firstMap : firstObj R P ⟶ secondObj R P :=
Pi.lift fun _ => Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map pullback.fst.op
#align category_theory.presheaf.first_map CategoryTheory.Presheaf.firstMap
def secondMap : firstObj R P ⟶ secondObj R P :=
Pi.lift fun _ => Pi.π _ _ ≫ P.map pullback.snd.op
#align category_theory.presheaf.second_map CategoryTheory.Presheaf.secondMap
theorem w : forkMap R P ≫ firstMap R P = forkMap R P ≫ secondMap R P := by
apply limit.hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟨Y, f, hf⟩, ⟨Z, g, hg⟩⟩
simp only [firstMap, secondMap, forkMap, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, assoc, Fan.mk_π_app,
Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, pullback.condition]
simp
#align category_theory.presheaf.w CategoryTheory.Presheaf.w
def IsSheaf' (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ (U : C) (R : Presieve U) (_ : generate R ∈ J U), Nonempty (IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (w R P)))
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf' CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf'
-- Again I wonder whether `UnivLE` can somehow be used to allow `s` to take
-- values in a more general universe.
def isSheafForIsSheafFor' (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) (s : A ⥤ Type max v₁ u₁)
[∀ J, PreservesLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{max v₁ u₁} J) s] (U : C) (R : Presieve U) :
IsLimit (s.mapCone (Fork.ofι _ (w R P))) ≃
IsLimit (Fork.ofι _ (Equalizer.Presieve.w (P ⋙ s) R)) := by
apply Equiv.trans (isLimitMapConeForkEquiv _ _) _
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm.trans (IsLimit.equivIsoLimit _)
· apply NatIso.ofComponents _ _
· rintro (_ | _)
· apply PreservesProduct.iso s
· apply PreservesProduct.iso s
· rintro _ _ (_ | _)
· refine limit.hom_ext (fun j => ?_)
dsimp [Equalizer.Presieve.firstMap, firstMap]
simp only [limit.lift_π, map_lift_piComparison, assoc, Fan.mk_π_app, Functor.map_comp]
rw [piComparison_comp_π_assoc]
· refine limit.hom_ext (fun j => ?_)
dsimp [Equalizer.Presieve.secondMap, secondMap]
simp only [limit.lift_π, map_lift_piComparison, assoc, Fan.mk_π_app, Functor.map_comp]
rw [piComparison_comp_π_assoc]
· dsimp
simp
· refine Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_
dsimp [Equalizer.forkMap, forkMap]
simp [Fork.ι]
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf_for_is_sheaf_for' CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheafForIsSheafFor'
-- Remark : this lemma uses `A'` not `A`; `A'` is `A` but with a universe
-- restriction. Can it be generalised?
theorem isSheaf_iff_isSheaf' : IsSheaf J P' ↔ IsSheaf' J P' := by
constructor
· intro h U R hR
refine ⟨?_⟩
apply coyonedaJointlyReflectsLimits
intro X
have q : Presieve.IsSheafFor (P' ⋙ coyoneda.obj X) _ := h X.unop _ hR
rw [← Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_generate] at q
rw [Equalizer.Presieve.sheaf_condition] at q
replace q := Classical.choice q
apply (isSheafForIsSheafFor' _ _ _ _).symm q
· intro h U X S hS
rw [Equalizer.Presieve.sheaf_condition]
refine ⟨?_⟩
refine isSheafForIsSheafFor' _ _ _ _ ?_
letI := preservesSmallestLimitsOfPreservesLimits (coyoneda.obj (op U))
apply isLimitOfPreserves
apply Classical.choice (h _ S.arrows _)
simpa
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf_iff_is_sheaf' CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf'
end
section Concrete
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheaf.lean | 723 | 726 | theorem isSheaf_of_isSheaf_comp (s : A ⥤ B) [ReflectsLimitsOfSize.{v₁, max v₁ u₁} s]
(h : IsSheaf J (P ⋙ s)) : IsSheaf J P := by |
rw [isSheaf_iff_isLimit] at h ⊢
exact fun X S hS ↦ (h S hS).map fun t ↦ isLimitOfReflects s t
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.NNRat.Defs
variable {ι α : Type*}
namespace NNRat
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℚ≥0) : (l.sum : ℚ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum coeHom _
#align nnrat.coe_list_sum NNRat.coe_list_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℚ≥0) : (l.prod : ℚ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod coeHom _
#align nnrat.coe_list_prod NNRat.coe_list_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℚ≥0) : (s.sum : ℚ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum coeHom _
#align nnrat.coe_multiset_sum NNRat.coe_multiset_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℚ≥0) : (s.prod : ℚ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod coeHom _
#align nnrat.coe_multiset_prod NNRat.coe_multiset_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℚ≥0} : ↑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, (f a : ℚ) :=
map_sum coeHom _ _
#align nnrat.coe_sum NNRat.coe_sum
theorem toNNRat_sum_of_nonneg {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℚ} (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a).toNNRat = ∑ a ∈ s, (f a).toNNRat := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_sum, Rat.coe_toNNRat _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs ↦ by rw [Rat.coe_toNNRat _ (hf x hxs)]
#align nnrat.to_nnrat_sum_of_nonneg NNRat.toNNRat_sum_of_nonneg
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℚ≥0} : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℚ) :=
map_prod coeHom _ _
#align nnrat.coe_prod NNRat.coe_prod
| Mathlib/Data/NNRat/BigOperators.lean | 52 | 55 | theorem toNNRat_prod_of_nonneg {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℚ} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, 0 ≤ f a) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a).toNNRat = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a).toNNRat := by |
rw [← coe_inj, coe_prod, Rat.coe_toNNRat _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs ↦ by rw [Rat.coe_toNNRat _ (hf x hxs)]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.List
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import data.set.countable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Function Set Encodable
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
namespace Set
protected def Countable (s : Set α) : Prop := Countable s
#align set.countable Set.Countable
@[simp]
theorem countable_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Countable s ↔ s.Countable := .rfl
#align set.countable_coe_iff Set.countable_coe_iff
theorem to_countable (s : Set α) [Countable s] : s.Countable := ‹_›
#align set.to_countable Set.to_countable
alias ⟨_root_.Countable.to_set, Countable.to_subtype⟩ := countable_coe_iff
#align countable.to_set Countable.to_set
#align set.countable.to_subtype Set.Countable.to_subtype
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_injective {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : s → ℕ, Injective f :=
countable_iff_exists_injective s
#align set.countable_iff_exists_injective Set.countable_iff_exists_injective
theorem countable_iff_exists_injOn {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : α → ℕ, InjOn f s :=
Set.countable_iff_exists_injective.trans exists_injOn_iff_injective.symm
#align set.countable_iff_exists_inj_on Set.countable_iff_exists_injOn
theorem countable_iff_nonempty_encodable {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ Nonempty (Encodable s) :=
Encodable.nonempty_encodable.symm
alias ⟨Countable.nonempty_encodable, _⟩ := countable_iff_nonempty_encodable
protected def Countable.toEncodable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : Encodable s :=
Classical.choice hs.nonempty_encodable
#align set.countable.to_encodable Set.Countable.toEncodable
theorem Countable.mono {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs : s₂.Countable) : s₁.Countable :=
have := hs.to_subtype; (inclusion_injective h).countable
#align set.countable.mono Set.Countable.mono
theorem countable_range [Countable ι] (f : ι → β) : (range f).Countable :=
surjective_onto_range.countable.to_set
#align set.countable_range Set.countable_range
theorem countable_iff_exists_subset_range [Nonempty α] {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → α, s ⊆ range f :=
⟨fun h => by
inhabit α
exact ⟨enumerateCountable h default, subset_range_enumerate _ _⟩, fun ⟨f, hsf⟩ =>
(countable_range f).mono hsf⟩
#align set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_surjective {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → s, Surjective f :=
@countable_iff_exists_surjective s hs.to_subtype
#align set.countable_iff_exists_surjective Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective
alias ⟨Countable.exists_surjective, _⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective
#align set.countable.exists_surjective Set.Countable.exists_surjective
theorem countable_univ [Countable α] : (univ : Set α).Countable :=
to_countable univ
#align set.countable_univ Set.countable_univ
theorem countable_univ_iff : (univ : Set α).Countable ↔ Countable α :=
countable_coe_iff.symm.trans (Equiv.Set.univ _).countable_iff
theorem Countable.exists_eq_range {s : Set α} (hc : s.Countable) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, s = range f := by
rcases hc.exists_surjective hs with ⟨f, hf⟩
refine ⟨(↑) ∘ f, ?_⟩
rw [hf.range_comp, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.countable.exists_eq_range Set.Countable.exists_eq_range
@[simp] theorem countable_empty : (∅ : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
#align set.countable_empty Set.countable_empty
@[simp] theorem countable_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
#align set.countable_singleton Set.countable_singleton
theorem Countable.image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Countable := by
rw [image_eq_range]
have := hs.to_subtype
apply countable_range
#align set.countable.image Set.Countable.image
theorem MapsTo.countable_of_injOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : MapsTo f s t)
(hf' : InjOn f s) (ht : t.Countable) : s.Countable :=
have := ht.to_subtype
have : Injective (hf.restrict f s t) := (injOn_iff_injective.1 hf').codRestrict _
this.countable
#align set.maps_to.countable_of_inj_on Set.MapsTo.countable_of_injOn
theorem Countable.preimage_of_injOn {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : (f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
(mapsTo_preimage f s).countable_of_injOn hf hs
#align set.countable.preimage_of_inj_on Set.Countable.preimage_of_injOn
protected theorem Countable.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
hs.preimage_of_injOn hf.injOn
#align set.countable.preimage Set.Countable.preimage
theorem exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable [CompleteLattice α] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ x, p x) :
(∃ s : ℕ → α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⨆ n, s n = ⊤) ↔
∃ S : Set α, S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ sSup S = ⊤ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hps, hs⟩
refine ⟨range s, countable_range s, forall_mem_range.2 hps, ?_⟩
rwa [sSup_range]
· rintro ⟨S, hSc, hps, hS⟩
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty S with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sSup_empty] at hS
haveI := subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top hS
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨fun _ => x, fun _ => hx, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· rcases (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective hne).1 hSc with ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n, fun n => hps _ (s n).coe_prop, ?_⟩
rwa [hs.iSup_comp, ← sSup_eq_iSup']
#align set.exists_seq_supr_eq_top_iff_countable Set.exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable
theorem exists_seq_cover_iff_countable {p : Set α → Prop} (h : ∃ s, p s) :
(∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ) ↔
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ ⋃₀ S = univ :=
exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable h
#align set.exists_seq_cover_iff_countable Set.exists_seq_cover_iff_countable
theorem countable_of_injective_of_countable_image {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : InjOn f s)
(hs : (f '' s).Countable) : s.Countable :=
(mapsTo_image _ _).countable_of_injOn hf hs
#align set.countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Set.countable_of_injective_of_countable_image
theorem countable_iUnion {t : ι → Set α} [Countable ι] (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Countable) :
(⋃ i, t i).Countable := by
have := fun i ↦ (ht i).to_subtype
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply countable_range
#align set.countable_Union Set.countable_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem countable_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] {t : ι → Set α} :
(⋃ i, t i).Countable ↔ ∀ i, (t i).Countable :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono <| subset_iUnion _ _, countable_iUnion⟩
#align set.countable_Union_iff Set.countable_iUnion_iff
theorem Countable.biUnion_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ a ∈ s, Set β} (hs : s.Countable) :
(⋃ a ∈ s, t a ‹_›).Countable ↔ ∀ a (ha : a ∈ s), (t a ha).Countable := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, countable_iUnion_iff, SetCoe.forall']
#align set.countable.bUnion_iff Set.Countable.biUnion_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Countable.lean | 241 | 242 | theorem Countable.sUnion_iff {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable) :
(⋃₀ s).Countable ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a.Countable := by | rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs.biUnion_iff]
|
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
#align_import algebra.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a07d750983b94c530ab69a726862c2ab6802b38c"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
variable {α β G M : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
#align comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative CommMagma.to_isCommutative
#align add_comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative AddCommMagma.to_isCommutative
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b c d : G} {n : ℤ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_inv_self : a / b = b⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_eq_self]
#align div_eq_inv_self div_eq_inv_self
#align sub_eq_neg_self sub_eq_neg_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_surjective (a : G) : Surjective (a * ·) :=
fun x ↦ ⟨a⁻¹ * x, mul_inv_cancel_left a x⟩
#align mul_left_surjective mul_left_surjective
#align add_left_surjective add_left_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_surjective (a : G) : Function.Surjective fun x ↦ x * a := fun x ↦
⟨x * a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_right x a⟩
#align mul_right_surjective mul_right_surjective
#align add_right_surjective add_right_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (h : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq
#align eq_add_neg_of_add_eq eq_add_neg_of_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (h : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq
#align eq_neg_add_of_add_eq eq_neg_add_of_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul (h : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c := by simp [h]
#align inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul
#align neg_add_eq_of_eq_add neg_add_eq_of_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c := by simp [h]
#align mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul
#align add_neg_eq_of_eq_add add_neg_eq_of_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq
#align eq_add_of_add_neg_eq eq_add_of_add_neg_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq
#align eq_add_of_neg_add_eq eq_add_of_neg_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul
#align add_eq_of_eq_neg_add add_eq_of_eq_neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
#align mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv
#align add_eq_of_eq_add_neg add_eq_of_eq_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left, fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_left_inv]⟩
#align mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv
#align add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv]
#align mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq
#align add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one : a = b⁻¹ ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.symm
#align eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one
#align eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq.symm
#align inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one
#align neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
#align eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq
#align eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
#align eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq
#align eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
#align inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
#align mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_one : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inv]
#align mul_inv_eq_one mul_inv_eq_one
#align add_neg_eq_zero add_neg_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inj]
#align inv_mul_eq_one inv_mul_eq_one
#align neg_add_eq_zero neg_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem conj_eq_one_iff : a * b * a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_right_eq_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_left_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ a / b := by
-- FIXME this could be by `simpa`, but it fails. This is probably a bug in `simpa`.
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ mul_left_injective b⁻¹ h
#align div_left_injective div_left_injective
#align sub_left_injective sub_left_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ b / a := by
-- FIXME see above
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ inv_injective (mul_right_injective b h)
#align div_right_injective div_right_injective
#align sub_right_injective sub_right_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_cancel (a b : G) : a / b * b = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_mul_cancel_right a b]
#align div_mul_cancel' div_mul_cancel
#align sub_add_cancel sub_add_cancel
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sub_self]
theorem div_self' (a : G) : a / a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_inv a]
#align div_self' div_self'
#align sub_self sub_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_cancel_right (a b : G) : a * b / b = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_right a b]
#align mul_div_cancel'' mul_div_cancel_right
#align add_sub_cancel add_sub_cancel_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma div_mul_cancel_right (a b : G) : a / (b * a) = b⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_div, mul_div_cancel_right]
#align div_mul_cancel''' div_mul_cancel_right
#align sub_add_cancel'' sub_add_cancel_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 1,020 | 1,021 | theorem mul_div_mul_right_eq_div (a b c : G) : a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by |
rw [div_mul_eq_div_div_swap]; simp only [mul_left_inj, eq_self_iff_true, mul_div_cancel_right]
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
#align_import topology.metric_space.emetric_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
open Set Filter Classical
open scoped Uniformity Topology Filter NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
theorem uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity [LinearOrder β] {U : Filter (α × α)} (z : β)
(D : α → α → β) (H : ∀ s, s ∈ U ↔ ∃ ε > z, ∀ {a b : α}, D a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :
U = ⨅ ε > z, 𝓟 { p : α × α | D p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
HasBasis.eq_biInf ⟨fun s => by simp only [H, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_setOf]⟩
#align uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity
@[ext]
class EDist (α : Type*) where
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞
#align has_edist EDist
export EDist (edist)
def uniformSpaceOfEDist (edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞) (edist_self : ∀ x : α, edist x x = 0)
(edist_comm : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = edist y x)
(edist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, edist x z ≤ edist x y + edist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, ENNReal.half_pos ε0.ne', fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
(ENNReal.add_lt_add h₁ h₂).trans_eq (ENNReal.add_halves _)⟩
#align uniform_space_of_edist uniformSpaceOfEDist
-- the uniform structure is embedded in the emetric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
class PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends EDist α : Type u where
edist_self : ∀ x : α, edist x x = 0
edist_comm : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = edist y x
edist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, edist x z ≤ edist x y + edist y z
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := uniformSpaceOfEDist edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle
uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by rfl
#align pseudo_emetric_space PseudoEMetricSpace
attribute [instance] PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace
@[ext]
protected theorem PseudoEMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoEMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toEDist = m'.toEDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with ed _ _ _ U hU
cases' m' with ed' _ _ _ U' hU'
congr 1
exact UniformSpace.ext (((show ed = ed' from h) ▸ hU).trans hU'.symm)
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
export PseudoEMetricSpace (edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle)
attribute [simp] edist_self
theorem edist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : edist x y ≤ edist z x + edist z y := by
rw [edist_comm z]; apply edist_triangle
#align edist_triangle_left edist_triangle_left
theorem edist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : edist x y ≤ edist x z + edist y z := by
rw [edist_comm y]; apply edist_triangle
#align edist_triangle_right edist_triangle_right
theorem edist_congr_right {x y z : α} (h : edist x y = 0) : edist x z = edist y z := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← zero_add (edist y z), ← h]
apply edist_triangle
· rw [edist_comm] at h
rw [← zero_add (edist x z), ← h]
apply edist_triangle
#align edist_congr_right edist_congr_right
theorem edist_congr_left {x y z : α} (h : edist x y = 0) : edist z x = edist z y := by
rw [edist_comm z x, edist_comm z y]
apply edist_congr_right h
#align edist_congr_left edist_congr_left
-- new theorem
theorem edist_congr {w x y z : α} (hl : edist w x = 0) (hr : edist y z = 0) :
edist w y = edist x z :=
(edist_congr_right hl).trans (edist_congr_left hr)
theorem edist_triangle4 (x y z t : α) : edist x t ≤ edist x y + edist y z + edist z t :=
calc
edist x t ≤ edist x z + edist z t := edist_triangle x z t
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z + edist z t := add_le_add_right (edist_triangle x y z) _
#align edist_triangle4 edist_triangle4
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align edist_le_Ico_sum_edist edist_le_Ico_sum_edist
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align edist_le_range_sum_edist edist_le_range_sum_edist
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le
theorem uniformity_pseudoedist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist
#align uniformity_pseudoedist uniformity_pseudoedist
theorem uniformSpace_edist :
‹PseudoEMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace =
uniformSpaceOfEDist edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext uniformity_pseudoedist
#align uniform_space_edist uniformSpace_edist
theorem uniformity_basis_edist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
(@uniformSpace_edist α _).symm ▸ UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun ⟨1, one_pos⟩ _ _ _ _ _
#align uniformity_basis_edist uniformity_basis_edist
theorem mem_uniformity_edist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_edist.mem_uniformity_iff
#align mem_uniformity_edist mem_uniformity_edist
protected theorem EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_edist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x hx => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx.out H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
#align emetric.mk_uniformity_basis EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis
protected theorem EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_edist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x hx => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx.out H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x hx => H (le_of_lt hx.out)⟩
#align emetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_le uniformity_basis_edist_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist' (ε' : ℝ≥0∞) (hε' : 0 < ε') :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => ε ∈ Ioo 0 ε') fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := exists_between hε'
⟨min ε δ, ⟨lt_min ε₀ hδ.1, lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) hδ.2⟩, min_le_left _ _⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist' uniformity_basis_edist'
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_le' (ε' : ℝ≥0∞) (hε' : 0 < ε') :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => ε ∈ Ioo 0 ε') fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => And.left) fun ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := exists_between hε'
⟨min ε δ, ⟨lt_min ε₀ hδ.1, lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) hδ.2⟩, min_le_left _ _⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_le' uniformity_basis_edist_le'
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => ENNReal.coe_pos.2) fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ε₀
⟨δ, ENNReal.coe_pos.1 hδ.1, le_of_lt hδ.2⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => ENNReal.coe_pos.2) fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ε₀
⟨δ, ENNReal.coe_pos.1 hδ.1, le_of_lt hδ.2⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < (↑n)⁻¹ } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ ↦ ENNReal.inv_pos.2 <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top n) fun _ε ε₀ ↦
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt (ne_of_gt ε₀)
⟨n, trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < 2⁻¹ ^ n } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => ENNReal.pow_pos (ENNReal.inv_pos.2 ENNReal.two_ne_top) _)
fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_inv_two_pow_lt (ne_of_gt ε₀)
⟨n, trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow
theorem edist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_edist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, id⟩
#align edist_mem_uniformity edist_mem_uniformity
open EMetric
def PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoEMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoEMetricSpace α where
edist := @edist _ m.toEDist
edist_self := edist_self
edist_comm := edist_comm
edist_triangle := edist_triangle
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_edist := H.trans (@PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist α _)
#align pseudo_emetric_space.replace_uniformity PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity
def PseudoEMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoEMetricSpace β) :
PseudoEMetricSpace α where
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_self _ := edist_self _
edist_comm _ _ := edist_comm _ _
edist_triangle _ _ _ := edist_triangle _ _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_edist := (uniformity_basis_edist.comap (Prod.map f f)).eq_biInf
#align pseudo_emetric_space.induced PseudoEMetricSpace.induced
instance {α : Type*} {p : α → Prop} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : PseudoEMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
theorem Subtype.edist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : edist x y = edist (x : α) y := rfl
#align subtype.edist_eq Subtype.edist_eq
instance Prod.pseudoEMetricSpaceMax [PseudoEMetricSpace β] : PseudoEMetricSpace (α × β) where
edist x y := edist x.1 y.1 ⊔ edist x.2 y.2
edist_self x := by simp
edist_comm x y := by simp [edist_comm]
edist_triangle x y z :=
max_le (le_trans (edist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)))
(le_trans (edist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _)))
uniformity_edist := uniformity_prod.trans <| by
simp [PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist, ← iInf_inf_eq, setOf_and]
toUniformSpace := inferInstance
#align prod.pseudo_emetric_space_max Prod.pseudoEMetricSpaceMax
theorem Prod.edist_eq [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (x y : α × β) :
edist x y = max (edist x.1 y.1) (edist x.2 y.2) :=
rfl
#align prod.edist_eq Prod.edist_eq
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) : Set α :=
{ y | edist y x < ε }
#align emetric.ball EMetric.ball
@[simp] theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ edist y x < ε := Iff.rfl
#align emetric.mem_ball EMetric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ edist x y < ε := by rw [edist_comm, mem_ball]
#align emetric.mem_ball' EMetric.mem_ball'
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :=
{ y | edist y x ≤ ε }
#align emetric.closed_ball EMetric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ edist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball EMetric.mem_closedBall
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 560 | 560 | theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ edist x y ≤ ε := by | rw [edist_comm, mem_closedBall]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.