Context stringlengths 295 65.3k | file_name stringlengths 21 74 | start int64 14 1.41k | end int64 20 1.41k | theorem stringlengths 27 1.42k | proof stringlengths 0 4.57k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 347 | 347 | theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend,
PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target {x : M} :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
section IsManifold
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'}
open IsManifold
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I 1 M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source (I := I)] at h2x
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, differentiableWithinAtProp_self_source,
DifferentiableWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x) hx'
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx',
preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt]
rw [differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy,
continuousWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
/-- An alternative formulation of `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source)
(hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq hs hx]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hx hy
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. Version requiring differentiability
in the target instead of `range I`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source))
(extChartAt I x x') := by
refine (mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans ?_
rw [← extChartAt_source I] at hx
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
rw [and_congr_right_iff]
set e := extChartAt I x; set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
refine fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
rw [← e.image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' hx,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' hx, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' hy)
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') :=
(mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, DifferentiableOn, Set.forall_mem_image, ← forall_and, MDifferentiableOn]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx => mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image he he' hs (hs hx) (h2s hx)
/-- Differentiability on a set is equivalent to differentiability in the extended charts. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) :=
(mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hs h2s).trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦
(e.continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff hs h2s).1 h.continuousOn
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) :=
mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source' {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (extChartAt I' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) := by
rw [extChartAt_source] at hs h2s
exact mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h x hx).1, fun x y z hz => ?_⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hz
let w := (extChartAt I x).symm z
have : w ∈ s := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
specialize h w this
have w1 : w ∈ (chartAt H x).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
have w2 : f w ∈ (chartAt H' y).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
convert ((mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source w1 w2).mp h).2.mono _
· simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
· mfld_set_tac
· rintro ⟨hcont, hdiff⟩ x hx
refine differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_iff.mpr ?_
refine ⟨hcont x hx, ?_⟩
dsimp [DifferentiableWithinAtProp]
convert hdiff x (f x) (extChartAt I x x) (by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]) using 1
mfld_set_tac
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_target :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M', MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f)
(s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
simp only [mdifferentiableOn_iff, ModelWithCorners.source_eq, chartAt_self_eq,
PartialHomeomorph.refl_partialEquiv, PartialEquiv.refl_trans, extChartAt,
PartialHomeomorph.extend, Set.preimage_univ, Set.inter_univ, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
constructor
· refine fun h' y => ⟨?_, fun x _ => h' x y⟩
have h'' : ContinuousOn _ univ := (ModelWithCorners.continuous I').continuousOn
convert (h''.comp_inter (chartAt H' y).continuousOn_toFun).comp_inter h
simp
· exact fun h' x y => (h' y).2 x 0
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
simp [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff, continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart in the
target. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff_target :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ y : M',
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
rw [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff_target]
simp [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
end IsManifold
/-! ### Deducing differentiability from smoothness -/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
suffices h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) x by
rwa [mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'] at h
apply hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
exact extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (f x)
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff]
exact ⟨hf.1.mono inter_subset_left, (hf.2.differentiableWithinAt (mod_cast hn)).mono
(by mfld_set_tac)⟩
theorem ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt hf hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
(hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiable (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
fun x => (hf x).mdifferentiableAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn := ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiable := ContMDiff.mdifferentiable
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiable.continuous (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt
/-! ### Deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds -/
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hg : MDifferentiableAt I I'' g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x)
(hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x) (hg : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s)
(hg : MDifferentiableOn I I'' g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I I'' g) : MDifferentiable I (I'.prod I'') fun x => (f x, g x) := fun x =>
(hf x).prodMk (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk := MDifferentiable.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s) (hg : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk_space (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''} (hf : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g) : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') fun x => (f x, g x) :=
fun x => (hf x).prodMk_space (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiable.prodMk_space
theorem writtenInExtChartAt_comp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
{y | writtenInExtChartAt I I'' x (g ∘ f) y =
(writtenInExtChartAt I' I'' (f x) g ∘ writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f) y} ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x := by
apply
@Filter.mem_of_superset _ _ (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) _
(extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
(h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _)))
mfld_set_tac
variable {f' f₀' f₁' : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (f x)}
{g' : TangentSpace I' (f x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I'' (g (f x))}
/-- `UniqueMDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
protected nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' := by
-- Porting note: didn't need `convert` because of finding instances by unification
convert U.eq h.2 h₁.2
protected theorem UniqueMDiffOn.eq (U : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (hx : x ∈ s)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' :=
UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U _ hx) h h₁
/-!
### General lemmas on derivatives of functions between manifolds
We mimic the API for functions between vector spaces
-/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderivWithin_univ : mfderivWithin I I' f univ = mfderiv I I' f := by
ext x : 1
simp only [mfderivWithin, mfderiv, mfld_simps]
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt (h : ¬MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x = 0 := by simp only [mfderiv, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] : MDifferentiable I I' f := by
intro x
have : Subsingleton H := I.injective.subsingleton
have : DiscreteTopology M := discreteTopology H M
simp only [mdifferentiableAt_iff, continuous_of_discreteTopology.continuousAt, true_and]
exact (hasFDerivAt_of_subsingleton _ _).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin
(hf : (mfderivWithin I I' f s x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
contrapose hf
rw [mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt hf]
contrapose! hf
rcases ContinuousLinearMap.isInvertible_zero_iff.1 hf with ⟨hE, hF⟩
have : Subsingleton E := hE
exact mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton.mdifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_of_isInvertible_mfderiv
(hf : (mfderiv I I' f x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp only [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mfderivWithin_univ] at hf ⊢
exact mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin hf
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst,
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 (inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono hst) (Subset.refl _))⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt h.1, HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 inter_subset_right⟩
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 657 | 665 | theorem HasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by | rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f univ x f' ↔ HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivAt, continuousWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 217 | 233 | theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by | let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
/-- Variant of `Ideal.IsPrime.comap` where ideal is explicit rather than implicit. -/
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
H.comap f
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I J : Ideal S) :
(I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
rfl
section Surjective
section
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction (hx := H) (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
end
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
(I : Ideal S) : map e (comap e I) = I :=
I.map_comap_of_surjective e (EquivLike.surjective e)
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
instance (priority := low) (f : R →+* S) [RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) [I.IsTwoSided] :
(I.map f).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left b ha := by
rw [map_eq_submodule_map] at ha ⊢
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := f.surjective b
rw [RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap, ← map_mul]
exact ⟨_, I.mul_mem_right _ ha, rfl⟩
open Function in
theorem IsMaximal.comap_piEvalRingHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
{i : ι} {I : Ideal (R i)} (h : I.IsMaximal) : (I.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i).IsMaximal := by
refine isMaximal_iff.mpr ⟨I.ne_top_iff_one.mp h.ne_top, fun J x le hxI hxJ ↦ ?_⟩
have ⟨r, y, hy, eq⟩ := h.exists_inv hxI
classical
convert J.add_mem (J.mul_mem_left (update 0 i r) hxJ)
(b := update 1 i y) (le <| by apply update_self i y 1 ▸ hy)
ext j
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa [eq_comm] using eq
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I J : Ideal S) :
comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
inj' _ _ eq := SetLike.ext' (Set.preimage_injective.mpr hf <| SetLike.ext'_iff.mp eq)
map_rel_iff' := comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective _ hf ..
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {I : Ideal R}
(H : IsMaximal I) : map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top ↦ ⟨⟨ne_top, fun _J hJ ↦ comap_injective_of_surjective f hf <|
H.1.2 _ (le_comap_map.trans_lt <| (orderEmbeddingOfSurjective f hf).strictMono hJ)⟩⟩
end Surjective
section Injective
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
theorem comap_bot_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm {I : Ideal S} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv (RingEquiv.symm f)
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {y : S} :
f.symm y ∈ I ↔ y ∈ I.map f := by
rw [← comap_symm, mem_comap]
@[simp]
theorem apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {x : R} :
f x ∈ I.map f ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← comap_symm, Ideal.mem_comap, f.symm_apply_apply]
theorem mem_map_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{I : Ideal R} (y : S) : y ∈ map e I ↔ ∃ x ∈ I, e x = y := by
constructor
· intro h
simp_rw [show map e I = _ from map_comap_of_equiv (e : R ≃+* S)] at h
exact ⟨(e : R ≃+* S).symm y, h, (e : R ≃+* S).apply_symm_apply y⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mem_map_of_mem e hx
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f) {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S}
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := map_comap_of_surjective _ hf.2
right_inv J :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ h ↦ have ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf.2).mp h; hf.1 eq ▸ hy)
le_comap_map
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, comap_mono⟩
have := map_mono (f := f) h
simpa only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, map_comap_of_surjective f hf.2] using this
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
lemma comap_map_of_bijective : (I.map f).comap f = I :=
le_antisymm ((comap_le_iff_le_map f hf).mpr fun _ ↦ id) le_comap_map
theorem isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (map f I) ↔ IsMaximal I := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).symm.isCoatom_iff _
theorem isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (comap f K) ↔ IsMaximal K := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).isCoatom_iff _
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.map_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.comap_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective
/-- A ring isomorphism sends a maximal ideal to a maximal ideal. -/
instance map_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (map e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.map_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
/-- The pullback of a maximal ideal under a ring isomorphism is a maximal ideal. -/
instance comap_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal S} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (comap e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.comap_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
theorem isMaximal_iff_of_bijective : (⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h ↦ map_bot (f := f) ▸ h.map_bijective f hf, fun h ↦ have e := RingEquiv.ofBijective f hf
map_bot (f := e.symm) ▸ h.map_bijective _ e.symm.bijective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias map.isMaximal := IsMaximal.map_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias comap.isMaximal := IsMaximal.comap_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff := isMaximal_iff_of_bijective
end Bijective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I : Ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
-- May not hold if `R` is a semiring: consider `ℕ →+* ZMod 2`.
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] :
IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end Surjective
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable (I J : Ideal R) (K L : Ideal S)
protected theorem map_mul {R} [Semiring R] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
(f : F) (I J : Ideal R) :
map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a (semi)ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →+* Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' := Ideal.map_mul f
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_add' I J := Ideal.map_sup f I J
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(Ideal.map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
lemma disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
{p : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} [p.IsPrime] :
Disjoint (I : Set S) (p.primeCompl.map f) ↔ I.comap f ≤ p := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
simp [Set.disjoint_iff, Set.ext_iff, Ideal.primeCompl, not_imp_not, SetLike.le_def]
/-- For a prime ideal `p` of `R`, `p` extended to `S` and
restricted back to `R` is `p` if and only if `p` is the restriction of a prime in `S`. -/
lemma comap_map_eq_self_iff_of_isPrime {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S}
(p : Ideal R) [p.IsPrime] :
(p.map f).comap f = p ↔ (∃ (q : Ideal S), q.IsPrime ∧ q.comap f = p) := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂, hq₃⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_prime_disjoint _ _
(disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mpr hp.le)
exact ⟨q, hq₁, le_antisymm (disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mp hq₃)
(map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hq₂)⟩
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
simp
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
variable (f : F) (g : G)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : Ideal R :=
Ideal.comap f ⊥
instance (priority := low) : (ker f).IsTwoSided := inferInstanceAs (Ideal.comap f ⊥).IsTwoSided
variable {f} in
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero. -/
@[simp] theorem mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 := by rw [ker, Ideal.mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot]
theorem ker_eq : (ker f : Set R) = Set.preimage f {0} :=
rfl
theorem ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = Ideal.comap f ⊥ :=
rfl
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 670 | 670 | theorem comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : (ker f).comap g = ker (f.comp g) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
theorem add_den_dvd_lcm (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den.lcm q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq, Nat.div_dvd_iff_dvd_mul (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
(Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right (by simp)), ← Nat.gcd_mul_lcm,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (Nat.lcm_ne_zero (by simp) (by simp)), Nat.dvd_gcd_iff]
refine ⟨?_, dvd_mul_right _ _⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs]
apply Int.dvd_add
<;> apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right <;> rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
<;> [exact Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _; exact Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _]
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 81 | 84 | theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by | rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yourong Zang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yourong Zang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
/-!
# The OnePoint Compactification
We construct the OnePoint compactification (the one-point compactification) of an arbitrary
topological space `X` and prove some properties inherited from `X`.
## Main definitions
* `OnePoint`: the OnePoint compactification, we use coercion for the canonical embedding
`X → OnePoint X`; when `X` is already compact, the compactification adds an isolated point
to the space.
* `OnePoint.infty`: the extra point
## Main results
* The topological structure of `OnePoint X`
* The connectedness of `OnePoint X` for a noncompact, preconnected `X`
* `OnePoint X` is `T₀` for a T₀ space `X`
* `OnePoint X` is `T₁` for a T₁ space `X`
* `OnePoint X` is normal if `X` is a locally compact Hausdorff space
## Tags
one-point compactification, Alexandroff compactification, compactness
-/
open Set Filter Topology
/-!
### Definition and basic properties
In this section we define `OnePoint X` to be the disjoint union of `X` and `∞`, implemented as
`Option X`. Then we restate some lemmas about `Option X` for `OnePoint X`.
-/
variable {X Y : Type*}
/-- The OnePoint extension of an arbitrary topological space `X` -/
def OnePoint (X : Type*) :=
Option X
/-- The repr uses the notation from the `OnePoint` locale. -/
instance [Repr X] : Repr (OnePoint X) :=
⟨fun o _ =>
match o with
| none => "∞"
| some a => "↑" ++ repr a⟩
namespace OnePoint
/-- The point at infinity -/
@[match_pattern] def infty : OnePoint X := none
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "∞" => OnePoint.infty
/-- Coercion from `X` to `OnePoint X`. -/
@[coe, match_pattern] def some : X → OnePoint X := Option.some
@[simp]
lemma some_eq_iff (x₁ x₂ : X) : (some x₁ = some x₂) ↔ (x₁ = x₂) := by
rw [iff_eq_eq]
exact Option.some.injEq x₁ x₂
instance : CoeTC X (OnePoint X) := ⟨some⟩
instance : Inhabited (OnePoint X) := ⟨∞⟩
protected lemma «forall» {p : OnePoint X → Prop} :
(∀ (x : OnePoint X), p x) ↔ p ∞ ∧ ∀ (x : X), p x :=
Option.forall
protected lemma «exists» {p : OnePoint X → Prop} :
(∃ x, p x) ↔ p ∞ ∨ ∃ (x : X), p x :=
Option.exists
instance [Fintype X] : Fintype (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Fintype (Option X))
instance infinite [Infinite X] : Infinite (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Infinite (Option X))
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
Option.some_injective X
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : X} : (x : OnePoint X) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_infty (x : X) : (x : OnePoint X) ≠ ∞ :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem infty_ne_coe (x : X) : ∞ ≠ (x : OnePoint X) :=
nofun
/-- Recursor for `OnePoint` using the preferred forms `∞` and `↑x`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator, cases_eliminator]
protected def rec {C : OnePoint X → Sort*} (infty : C ∞) (coe : ∀ x : X, C x) :
∀ z : OnePoint X, C z
| ∞ => infty
| (x : X) => coe x
/-- An elimination principle for `OnePoint`. -/
@[inline] protected def elim : OnePoint X → Y → (X → Y) → Y := Option.elim
@[simp] theorem elim_infty (y : Y) (f : X → Y) : ∞.elim y f = y := rfl
@[simp] theorem elim_some (y : Y) (f : X → Y) (x : X) : (some x).elim y f = f x := rfl
theorem isCompl_range_coe_infty : IsCompl (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) {∞} :=
isCompl_range_some_none X
theorem range_coe_union_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∪ {∞} = univ :=
range_some_union_none X
@[simp]
theorem insert_infty_range_coe : insert ∞ (range (@some X)) = univ :=
insert_none_range_some _
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_inter_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∩ {∞} = ∅ :=
range_some_inter_none X
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_coe : (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X))ᶜ = {∞} :=
compl_range_some X
theorem compl_infty : ({∞}ᶜ : Set (OnePoint X)) = range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
(@isCompl_range_coe_infty X).symm.compl_eq
theorem compl_image_coe (s : Set X) : ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ = (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [coe_injective.compl_image_eq, compl_range_coe]
theorem ne_infty_iff_exists {x : OnePoint X} : x ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ y : X, (y : OnePoint X) = x := by
induction x using OnePoint.rec <;> simp
instance canLift : CanLift (OnePoint X) X (↑) fun x => x ≠ ∞ :=
WithTop.canLift
theorem not_mem_range_coe_iff {x : OnePoint X} : x ∉ range some ↔ x = ∞ := by
rw [← mem_compl_iff, compl_range_coe, mem_singleton_iff]
theorem infty_not_mem_range_coe : ∞ ∉ range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
not_mem_range_coe_iff.2 rfl
theorem infty_not_mem_image_coe {s : Set X} : ∞ ∉ ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) '' s :=
not_mem_subset (image_subset_range _ _) infty_not_mem_range_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_infty : ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' {∞} = ∅ := by
ext
simp
/-- Extend a map `f : X → Y` to a map `OnePoint X → OnePoint Y`
by sending infinity to infinity. -/
protected def map (f : X → Y) : OnePoint X → OnePoint Y :=
Option.map f
@[simp] theorem map_infty (f : X → Y) : OnePoint.map f ∞ = ∞ := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_some (f : X → Y) (x : X) : (x : OnePoint X).map f = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_id : OnePoint.map (id : X → X) = id := Option.map_id
theorem map_comp {Z : Type*} (f : Y → Z) (g : X → Y) :
OnePoint.map (f ∘ g) = OnePoint.map f ∘ OnePoint.map g :=
(Option.map_comp_map _ _).symm
/-!
### Topological space structure on `OnePoint X`
We define a topological space structure on `OnePoint X` so that `s` is open if and only if
* `(↑) ⁻¹' s` is open in `X`;
* if `∞ ∈ s`, then `((↑) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ` is compact.
Then we reformulate this definition in a few different ways, and prove that
`(↑) : X → OnePoint X` is an open embedding. If `X` is not a compact space, then we also prove
that `(↑)` has dense range, so it is a dense embedding.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
instance : TopologicalSpace (OnePoint X) where
IsOpen s := (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) ∧
IsOpen (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro ⟨hms, hs⟩ ⟨hmt, ht⟩
refine ⟨?_, hs.inter ht⟩
rintro ⟨hms', hmt'⟩
simpa [compl_inter] using (hms hms').union (hmt hmt')
isOpen_sUnion S ho := by
suffices IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' ⋃₀ S : Set X) by
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rintro ⟨s, hsS : s ∈ S, hs : ∞ ∈ s⟩
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset ((ho s hsS).1 hs) this.isClosed_compl ?_
exact compl_subset_compl.mpr (preimage_mono <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hsS)
rw [preimage_sUnion]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun s hs => (ho s hs).2
variable {s : Set (OnePoint X)}
theorem isOpen_def :
IsOpen s ↔ (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ) ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem' (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactification/OnePoint.lean | 224 | 226 | theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ := by | simp only [isOpen_iff_of_mem' h, isClosed_compl_iff, and_comm] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metrizable
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each Borel measurable function can be approximated pointwise
by a sequence of simple functions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.nearestPt (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) : α →ₛ ℕ`: the `SimpleFunc` sending
each `x : α` to the point `e k` which is the nearest to `x` among `e 0`, ..., `e N`.
* `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approxOn (f : β → α) (hf : Measurable f) (s : Set α) (y₀ : α)
(h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (n : ℕ) : β →ₛ α` : a simple function that takes values in `s`
and approximates `f`.
## Main results
* `tendsto_approxOn` (pointwise convergence): If `f x ∈ s`, then the sequence of simple
approximations `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n`, evaluated at `x`,
tends to `f x` as `n` tends to `∞`.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ β` (local notation): the type of simple functions `α → β`.
-/
open Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric Finset
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ι E F 𝕜 : Type*}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
/-! ### Pointwise approximation by simple functions -/
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
/-- `nearestPtInd e N x` is the index `k` such that `e k` is the nearest point to `x` among the
points `e 0`, ..., `e N`. If more than one point are at the same distance from `x`, then
`nearestPtInd e N x` returns the least of their indexes. -/
noncomputable def nearestPtInd (e : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α →ₛ ℕ
| 0 => const α 0
| N + 1 =>
piecewise (⋂ k ≤ N, { x | edist (e (N + 1)) x < edist (e k) x })
(MeasurableSet.iInter fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.iInter fun _ =>
measurableSet_lt measurable_edist_right measurable_edist_right)
(const α <| N + 1) (nearestPtInd e N)
/-- `nearestPt e N x` is the nearest point to `x` among the points `e 0`, ..., `e N`. If more than
one point are at the same distance from `x`, then `nearestPt e N x` returns the point with the
least possible index. -/
noncomputable def nearestPt (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) : α →ₛ α :=
(nearestPtInd e N).map e
@[simp]
theorem nearestPtInd_zero (e : ℕ → α) : nearestPtInd e 0 = const α 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nearestPt_zero (e : ℕ → α) : nearestPt e 0 = const α (e 0) :=
rfl
theorem nearestPtInd_succ (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) (x : α) :
nearestPtInd e (N + 1) x =
if ∀ k ≤ N, edist (e (N + 1)) x < edist (e k) x then N + 1 else nearestPtInd e N x := by
simp only [nearestPtInd, coe_piecewise, Set.piecewise]
congr
simp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFuncDense.lean | 87 | 92 | theorem nearestPtInd_le (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) (x : α) : nearestPtInd e N x ≤ N := by | induction' N with N ihN; · simp
simp only [nearestPtInd_succ]
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, ihN.trans N.le_succ] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Renaming variables of polynomials
This file establishes the `rename` operation on multivariate polynomials,
which modifies the set of variables.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.rename`
* `MvPolynomial.renameEquiv`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ α : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R S : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` `[CommSemiring S]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R` elements of the coefficient ring
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ α`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {σ τ α R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
namespace MvPolynomial
section Rename
/-- Rename all the variables in a multivariable polynomial. -/
def rename (f : σ → τ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval (X ∘ f)
theorem rename_C (f : σ → τ) (r : R) : rename f (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem rename_X (f : σ → τ) (i : σ) : rename f (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X (f i) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
theorem map_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p
(fun a => by simp only [map_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, map_add]) fun p n hp => by
simp only [hp, rename_X, map_X, map_mul]
lemma map_comp_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) :
(map f).comp (rename g).toRingHom = (rename g).toRingHom.comp (map f) :=
RingHom.ext fun p ↦ map_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _ by
simp only [rename, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
-- Porting note: the Lean 3 proof of this was very fragile and included a nonterminal `simp`.
-- Hopefully this is less prone to breaking
rw [eval₂_comp_left (eval₂Hom (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial α R)) (X ∘ g)) C (X ∘ f) p]
simp only [comp_def, eval₂Hom_X']
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext1; simp only [comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, eval₂Hom_C]
lemma rename_comp_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) :
(rename (R := R) g).comp (rename f) = rename (g ∘ f) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ rename_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_id : rename id = AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ eval₂_eta p
lemma rename_id_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : rename id p = p := by
simp
theorem rename_monomial (f : σ → τ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
rename f (monomial d r) = monomial (d.mapDomain f) r := by
rw [rename, aeval_monomial, monomial_eq (s := Finsupp.mapDomain f d),
Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index]
· rfl
· exact fun n => pow_zero _
· exact fun n i₁ i₂ => pow_add _ _ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Rename.lean | 102 | 106 | theorem rename_eq (f : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename f p = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p := by | simp only [rename, aeval_def, eval₂, Finsupp.mapDomain, algebraMap_eq, comp_apply,
X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index]
rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
/-!
# Iterations of a function
In this file we prove simple properties of `Nat.iterate f n` a.k.a. `f^[n]`:
* `iterate_zero`, `iterate_succ`, `iterate_succ'`, `iterate_add`, `iterate_mul`:
formulas for `f^[0]`, `f^[n+1]` (two versions), `f^[n+m]`, and `f^[n*m]`;
* `iterate_id` : `id^[n]=id`;
* `Injective.iterate`, `Surjective.iterate`, `Bijective.iterate` :
iterates of an injective/surjective/bijective function belong to the same class;
* `LeftInverse.iterate`, `RightInverse.iterate`, `Commute.iterate_left`, `Commute.iterate_right`,
`Commute.iterate_iterate`:
some properties of pairs of functions survive under iterations
* `iterate_fixed`, `Function.Semiconj.iterate_*`, `Function.Semiconj₂.iterate`:
if `f` fixes a point (resp., semiconjugates unary/binary operations), then so does `f^[n]`.
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Iterate a function. -/
def Nat.iterate {α : Sort u} (op : α → α) : ℕ → α → α
| 0, a => a
| succ k, a => iterate op k (op a)
@[inherit_doc Nat.iterate]
notation:max f "^["n"]" => Nat.iterate f n
namespace Function
open Function (Commute)
variable (f : α → α)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_zero : f^[0] = id :=
rfl
theorem iterate_zero_apply (x : α) : f^[0] x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) : f^[n.succ] = f^[n] ∘ f :=
rfl
theorem iterate_succ_apply (n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[n.succ] x = f^[n] (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (n : ℕ) : (id : α → α)^[n] = id :=
Nat.recOn n rfl fun n ihn ↦ by rw [iterate_succ, ihn, id_comp]
theorem iterate_add (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, f^[m + n] = f^[m] ∘ f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| Nat.succ n => by rw [Nat.add_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_add m n]; rfl
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Iterate.lean | 71 | 72 | theorem iterate_add_apply (m n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[m + n] x = f^[m] (f^[n] x) := by | rw [iterate_add f m n] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Fin
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Finset Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
/-!
### Locally finite order etc instances
-/
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder (n : ℕ) : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) where
finsetIcc a b := attachFin (Icc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIco a b := attachFin (Ico a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finsetIoc a b := attachFin (Ioc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIoo a b := attachFin (Ioo a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finset_mem_Icc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ico a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioo a b := by simp
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderBot
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n}
variable {m : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Icc :
attachFin (Icc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Icc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico :
attachFin (Ico a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ico a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioc :
attachFin (Ioc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Ioc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo :
attachFin (Ioo a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ioo a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_uIcc :
attachFin (uIcc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt (max a b).2) = uIcc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici : attachFin (Ico a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2) = Ici a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi : attachFin (Ioo a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2) = Ioi a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Iic : attachFin (Iic a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iic.mp hx).trans_lt a.2) = Iic a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Iio : attachFin (Iio a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iio.mp hx).trans a.2) = Iio a := by
ext; simp
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Icc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ico (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioo (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).fin n := attachFin_eq_fin _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_uIcc (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := Icc_eq_finset_subtype _ _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ici_eq_finset_subtype : Ici a = (Ico (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Ioi_eq_finset_subtype : Ioi a = (Ioo (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Iic (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Iic_eq_finset_subtype : Iic b = (Iic (b : ℕ)).fin n := by ext; simp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated attachFin_Iio (since := "2025-04-06")]
theorem Iio_eq_finset_subtype : Iio b = (Iio (b : ℕ)).fin n := by ext; simp
end deprecated
section val
/-!
### Images under `Fin.val`
-/
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Icc : (Icc a b).image val = Icc (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ico : (Ico a b).image val = Ico (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioc : (Ioc a b).image val = Ioc (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioo : (Ioo a b).image val = Ioo (a : ℕ) b :=
image_val_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_uIcc : (uIcc a b).image val = uIcc (a : ℕ) b :=
finsetImage_val_Icc _ _
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ici : (Ici a).image val = Ico (a : ℕ) n := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Ioi : (Ioi a).image val = Ioo (a : ℕ) n := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Iic : (Iic a).image val = Iic (a : ℕ) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem finsetImage_val_Iio : (Iio b).image val = Iio (b : ℕ) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-!
### `Finset.map` along `Fin.valEmbedding`
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioo : (Ioo a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_attachFin _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 190 | 201 | theorem map_valEmbedding_uIcc : (uIcc a b).map valEmbedding = uIcc (a : ℕ) b :=
map_valEmbedding_Icc _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")]
alias map_subtype_embedding_uIcc := map_valEmbedding_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ici : (Ici a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico (a : ℕ) n := by | rw [← attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici, map_valEmbedding_attachFin]
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioi : (Ioi a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo (a : ℕ) n := by |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogBounds
/-!
# Complex arctangent
This file defines the complex arctangent `Complex.arctan` as
$$\arctan z = -\frac i2 \log \frac{1 + zi}{1 - zi}$$
and shows that it extends `Real.arctan` to the complex plane. Its Taylor series expansion
$$\arctan z = \frac{(-1)^n}{2n + 1} z^{2n + 1},\ |z|<1$$
is proved in `Complex.hasSum_arctan`.
-/
namespace Complex
open scoped Real
/-- The complex arctangent, defined via the complex logarithm. -/
noncomputable def arctan (z : ℂ) : ℂ := -I / 2 * log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I))
theorem tan_arctan {z : ℂ} (h₁ : z ≠ I) (h₂ : z ≠ -I) : tan (arctan z) = z := by
unfold tan sin cos
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
-- multiply top and bottom by `exp (arctan z * I)`
← mul_div_mul_right _ _ (exp_ne_zero (arctan z * I)), sub_mul, add_mul,
← exp_add, neg_mul, neg_add_cancel, exp_zero, ← exp_add, ← two_mul]
have z₁ : 1 + z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₁
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg] at h₁
exact h₁.symm
have z₂ : 1 - z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₂
rw [sub_eq_zero, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, one_mul] at h₂
exact h₂.symm
have key : exp (2 * (arctan z * I)) = (1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I) := by
rw [arctan, ← mul_rotate, ← mul_assoc,
show 2 * (I * (-I / 2)) = 1 by field_simp, one_mul, exp_log]
· exact div_ne_zero z₁ z₂
-- multiply top and bottom by `1 - z * I`
rw [key, ← mul_div_mul_right _ _ z₂, sub_mul, add_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ z₂, one_mul,
show _ / _ * I = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
/-- `cos z` is nonzero when the bounds in `arctan_tan` are met (`z` lies in the vertical strip
`-π / 2 < z.re < π / 2` and `z ≠ π / 2`). -/
lemma cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re)
(h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) : cos z ≠ 0 := by
refine cos_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun k ↦ ?_)
rw [ne_eq, Complex.ext_iff, not_and_or] at h₀ ⊢
norm_cast at h₀ ⊢
rcases h₀ with nr | ni
· left; contrapose! nr
rw [nr, mul_div_assoc, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_lt_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₁
rw [nr, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (by positivity)] at h₂
norm_cast at h₁ h₂
change -1 < _ at h₁
rwa [show 2 * k + 1 = 1 by omega, Int.cast_one, one_mul] at nr
· exact Or.inr ni
theorem arctan_tan {z : ℂ} (h₀ : z ≠ π / 2) (h₁ : -(π / 2) < z.re) (h₂ : z.re ≤ π / 2) :
arctan (tan z) = z := by
have h := cos_ne_zero_of_arctan_bounds h₀ h₁ h₂
unfold arctan tan
-- multiply top and bottom by `cos z`
rw [← mul_div_mul_right (1 + _) _ h, add_mul, sub_mul, one_mul, ← mul_rotate, mul_div_cancel₀ _ h]
conv_lhs =>
enter [2, 1, 2]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← sin_neg, ← cos_neg]
rw [← exp_mul_I, ← exp_mul_I, ← exp_sub, show z * I - -z * I = 2 * (I * z) by ring, log_exp,
show -I / 2 * (2 * (I * z)) = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
all_goals norm_num
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' two_pos, neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' two_pos]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_arctan (x : ℝ) : (Real.arctan x : ℂ) = arctan x := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Real.tan_arctan x]
rw [ofReal_tan, arctan_tan]
all_goals norm_cast
· rw [← ne_eq]; exact (Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two _).ne
· exact Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan _
· exact (Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two _).le
/-- The argument of `1 + z` for `z` in the open unit disc is always in `(-π / 2, π / 2)`. -/
lemma arg_one_add_mem_Ioo {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) : (1 + z).arg ∈ Set.Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [Set.mem_Ioo, ← abs_lt, abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, add_re, one_re, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add']
exact Or.inl (abs_lt.mp ((abs_re_le_norm z).trans_lt hz)).1
/-- We can combine the logs in `log (1 + z * I) + -log (1 - z * I)` into one.
This is only used in `hasSum_arctan`. -/
lemma hasSum_arctan_aux {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
log (1 + z * I) + -log (1 - z * I) = log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I)) := by
have z₁ := mem_slitPlane_iff_arg.mp (mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one (z := z * I) (by simpa))
have z₂ := mem_slitPlane_iff_arg.mp (mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one (z := -(z * I)) (by simpa))
rw [← sub_eq_add_neg] at z₂
rw [← log_inv _ z₂.1, ← (log_mul_eq_add_log_iff z₁.2 (inv_eq_zero.ne.mpr z₂.2)).mpr,
div_eq_mul_inv]
-- `log_mul_eq_add_log_iff` requires a bound on `arg (1 + z * I) + arg (1 - z * I)⁻¹`.
-- `arg_one_add_mem_Ioo` provides sufficiently tight bounds on both terms
have b₁ := arg_one_add_mem_Ioo (z := z * I) (by simpa)
have b₂ : arg (1 - z * I)⁻¹ ∈ Set.Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
simp_rw [arg_inv, z₂.1, ite_false, Set.neg_mem_Ioo_iff, neg_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact arg_one_add_mem_Ioo (by simpa)
have c₁ := add_lt_add b₁.1 b₂.1
have c₂ := add_lt_add b₁.2 b₂.2
rw [show -(π / 2) + -(π / 2) = -π by ring] at c₁
rw [show π / 2 + π / 2 = π by ring] at c₂
exact ⟨c₁, c₂.le⟩
/-- The power series expansion of `Complex.arctan`, valid on the open unit disc. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arctan.lean | 115 | 132 | theorem hasSum_arctan {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (-1) ^ n * z ^ (2 * n + 1) / ↑(2 * n + 1)) (arctan z) := by | have := ((hasSum_taylorSeries_log (z := z * I) (by simpa)).add
(hasSum_taylorSeries_neg_log (z := z * I) (by simpa))).mul_left (-I / 2)
simp_rw [← add_div, ← add_one_mul, hasSum_arctan_aux hz] at this
replace := (Nat.divModEquiv 2).symm.hasSum_iff.mpr this
dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp_rw [← mul_comm 2 _] at this
refine this.prod_fiberwise fun k => ?_
dsimp only
convert hasSum_fintype (_ : Fin 2 → ℂ) using 1
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, Odd.neg_one_pow (n := 2 * k + 0 + 1) (by simp),
neg_add_cancel, zero_mul, zero_div, mul_zero, zero_add,
show 2 * k + 1 + 1 = 2 * (k + 1) by ring, Even.neg_one_pow (n := 2 * (k + 1)) (by simp),
← mul_div_assoc (_ / _), ← mul_assoc, show -I / 2 * (1 + 1) = -I by ring]
congr 1
rw [mul_pow, pow_succ' I, pow_mul, I_sq,
show -I * _ = -(I * I) * (-1) ^ k * z ^ (2 * k + 1) by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 449 | 450 | theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by | simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn,
Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-! # getD and getI
This file provides theorems for working with the `getD` and `getI` functions. These are used to
access an element of a list by numerical index, with a default value as a fallback when the index
is out of range.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
namespace List
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (l : List α) (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ)
section getD
variable (d : α)
theorem getD_eq_getElem {n : ℕ} (hn : n < l.length) : l.getD n d = l[n] := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp at hn
| cons head tail ih =>
cases n
· exact getD_cons_zero
· exact ih _
| Mathlib/Data/List/GetD.lean | 38 | 44 | theorem getD_map {n : ℕ} (f : α → β) : (map f l).getD n (f d) = f (l.getD n d) := by | simp
theorem getD_eq_default {n : ℕ} (hn : l.length ≤ n) : l.getD n d = d := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => exact getD_nil
| cons head tail ih =>
cases n |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 121 | 121 | theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem h hs]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self h]
apply Nat.pred_le
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem ncard_exchange {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| encard_exchange ha hb
theorem ncard_exchange' {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
(insert a s \ {b}).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_exchange ha hb, ← singleton_union, ← singleton_union, union_diff_distrib,
@diff_singleton_eq_self _ b {a} fun h ↦ ha (by rwa [← mem_singleton_iff.mp h])]
lemma odd_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Odd (insert a s).ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.odd_add]
simp only [Nat.odd_add, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Nat.not_even_one, iff_false, Decidable.not_not]
lemma even_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Even (insert a s).ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.even_add_one, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end InsertErase
variable {f : α → β}
theorem ncard_image_le (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (f '' s).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_image_le
theorem ncard_image_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| H.encard_image
theorem injOn_of_ncard_image_eq (h : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq] at h
exact hs.injOn_of_encard_image_eq h
theorem ncard_image_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(f '' s).ncard = s.ncard ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h ↦ injOn_of_ncard_image_eq h hs, ncard_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem ncard_image_of_injective (s : Set α) (H : f.Injective) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
theorem ncard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range {s : Set β} (H : f.Injective)
(hs : s ⊆ Set.range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injective _ H, image_preimage_eq_iff.mpr hs]
theorem fiber_ncard_ne_zero_iff_mem_image {y : β} (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
{ x ∈ s | f x = y }.ncard ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ f '' s := by
refine ⟨nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact @ncard_ne_zero_of_mem _ ({ x ∈ s | f x = f z }) z (mem_sep hz rfl)
(hs.subset (sep_subset _ _))
@[simp] theorem ncard_map (f : α ↪ β) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injective _ f.inj'
@[simp] theorem ncard_subtype (P : α → Prop) (s : Set α) :
{ x : Subtype P | (x : α) ∈ s }.ncard = (s ∩ setOf P).ncard := by
convert (ncard_image_of_injective _ (@Subtype.coe_injective _ P)).symm
ext x
simp [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right]
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_left (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_left hs
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_right (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ t.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_right ht
theorem eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (h : s ⊆ t) (h' : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s = t :=
ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' h
(by rwa [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq] at h')
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_ncard_le (h : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst ↦ eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hst h ht, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (h : f '' s ⊆ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
f '' s = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le h (ncard_map _).ge hs
theorem sep_of_ncard_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : { x ∈ s | P x }.ncard = s.ncard) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : P a :=
sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true.mp (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (by simp) h.symm.le hs) _ ha
theorem ncard_lt_ncard (h : s ⊂ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard < t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h.subset).cast_ncard_eq]
exact (ht.subset h.subset).encard_lt_encard h
theorem ncard_strictMono [Finite α] : @StrictMono (Set α) _ _ _ ncard :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ncard_lt_ncard h
theorem ncard_eq_of_bijective {n : ℕ} (f : ∀ i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀ (i) (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i j) (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.ncard = n := by
let f' : Fin n → α := fun i ↦ f i.val i.is_lt
suffices himage : s = f' '' Set.univ by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Set.ncard_univ, himage]
exact ncard_image_of_injOn <| fun i _hi j _hj h ↦ Fin.ext <| f_inj i.val j.val i.is_lt j.is_lt h
ext x
simp only [image_univ, mem_range]
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ?_, fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ hf' i hi⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
use ⟨i, hi⟩
theorem ncard_congr {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.ncard = t.ncard := by
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, h₁ _ _⟩
have hbij : f'.Bijective := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
exact h₂ _ _ hx hy hxy
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h₃ y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f' hbij)
theorem ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : InjOn f s)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
have hle := encard_le_encard_of_injOn hf f_inj
to_encard_tac; rwa [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.finite_of_encard_le hle).cast_ncard_eq]
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_ncard_lt_of_maps_to {t : Set β} (hc : t.ncard < s.ncard) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
by_contra h'
simp only [Ne, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not] at h'
exact (ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn f hf h' ht).not_lt hc
theorem le_ncard_of_inj_on_range {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
n ≤ s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs]
apply Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range <;> simpa
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
intro b hb
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have finj : f'.Injective := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
apply hinj _ _ hx hy hxy
have hft := ht.fintype
have hft' := Fintype.ofInjective f' finj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
convert @Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f'' _ _ _ _ (by simpa) using 1
· simp [f'']
· simp [f'', hf]
· intros a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h
rw [mem_toFinset] at ha₁ ha₂
exact hinj _ _ ha₁ ha₂ h
rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
a₁ = a₂ := by
classical
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have hsurj : f'.Surjective := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hsurj y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
haveI := hs.fintype
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective _ hsurj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
exact
@Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f''
(fun a ha ↦ by { rw [mem_toFinset] at ha ⊢; exact hf a ha }) (by simpa)
(by { rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card'] }) a₁
(by simpa) a₂ (by simpa) (by simpa)
@[simp] theorem ncard_coe {α : Type*} (s : Set α) :
Set.ncard (Set.univ : Set (Set.Elem s)) = s.ncard :=
Set.ncard_congr (fun a ha ↦ ↑a) (fun a ha ↦ a.prop) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma ncard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : (s.graphOn f).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
section Lattice
theorem ncard_union_add_ncard_inter (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard + (s ∩ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq,
(hs.subset inter_subset_left).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_add_encard_inter]
theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_union (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
rw [add_comm, ncard_union_add_ncard_inter _ _ hs ht]
theorem ncard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard + t.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := (s ∪ t).finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac
rw [h.cast_ncard_eq, (h.subset subset_union_left).cast_ncard_eq,
(h.subset subset_union_right).cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_union_le
rw [h.ncard]
apply zero_le
theorem ncard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_eq h]
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard + s.ncard = t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq, ht.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h]
theorem ncard_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
obtain ht | ht := t.finite_or_infinite
· rw [← ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset hst ht, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.zero_sub, (ht.diff hs).ncard]
lemma cast_ncard_sdiff {R : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne R] (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((t \ s).ncard : R) = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_diff hst (ht.subset hst), Nat.cast_sub (ncard_le_ncard hst ht)]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ (s \ t).ncard + t.ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem le_ncard_diff (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
t.ncard - s.ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr (by rw [add_comm]; apply ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard _ _ hs)
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ t).ncard + t.ncard = (s ∪ t).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left hs.diff ht, diff_union_self]
theorem diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, diff_eq_empty]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (ncard_le_ncard h' hs)
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s :=
diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard h hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard (s t : Set α)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s \ t).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_right)
(hs.inter_of_left _) hs.diff, union_comm, diff_union_inter]
theorem ncard_eq_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_eq_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard = t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard = (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_right_inj]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_le_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem ncard_lt_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_lt_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard < t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard < (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem ncard_add_ncard_compl (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(hsc : sᶜ.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard + sᶜ.ncard = Nat.card α := by
rw [← ncard_univ, ← ncard_union_eq (@disjoint_compl_right _ _ s) hs hsc, union_compl_self]
theorem eq_univ_iff_ncard [Finite α] (s : Set α) :
s = univ ↔ ncard s = Nat.card α := by
rw [← compl_empty_iff, ← ncard_eq_zero, ← ncard_add_ncard_compl s, left_eq_add]
lemma even_ncard_compl_iff [Finite α] (heven : Even (Nat.card α)) (s : Set α) :
Even sᶜ.ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
simp [compl_eq_univ_diff, ncard_diff (subset_univ _ : s ⊆ Set.univ),
Nat.even_sub (ncard_le_ncard (subset_univ _ : s ⊆ Set.univ)),
(ncard_univ _).symm ▸ heven]
lemma odd_ncard_compl_iff [Finite α] (heven : Even (Nat.card α)) (s : Set α) :
Odd sᶜ.ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, even_ncard_compl_iff heven, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end Lattice
/-- Given a subset `s` of a set `t`, of sizes at most and at least `n` respectively, there exists a
set `u` of size `n` which is both a superset of `s` and a subset of `t`. -/
lemma exists_subsuperset_card_eq {n : ℕ} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hsn : s.ncard ≤ n) (hnt : n ≤ t.ncard) :
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ u.ncard = n := by
obtain ht | ht := t.infinite_or_finite
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.le_zero, ← ht.ncard] at hnt
exact ⟨t, hst, Subset.rfl, hnt.symm⟩
lift s to Finset α using ht.subset hst
lift t to Finset α using ht
obtain ⟨u, hsu, hut, hu⟩ := Finset.exists_subsuperset_card_eq (mod_cast hst) (by simpa using hsn)
(mod_cast hnt)
exact ⟨u, mod_cast hsu, mod_cast hut, mod_cast hu⟩
/-- We can shrink a set to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_subset_card_eq {n : ℕ} (hns : n ≤ s.ncard) : ∃ t ⊆ s, t.ncard = n := by
simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.empty_subset (by simp) hns
theorem Infinite.exists_subset_ncard_eq {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) (k : ℕ) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Finite ∧ t.ncard = k := by
have := hs.to_subtype
obtain ⟨t', -, rfl⟩ := @Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq s univ infinite_univ k
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' (t' : Set s), by simp, Finite.image _ (by simp), ?_⟩
rw [ncard_image_of_injective _ Subtype.coe_injective]
simp
theorem Infinite.exists_superset_ncard_eq {s t : Set α} (ht : t.Infinite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : s.Finite) {k : ℕ} (hsk : s.ncard ≤ k) : ∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ s' ⊆ t ∧ s'.ncard = k := by
obtain ⟨s₁, hs₁, hs₁fin, hs₁card⟩ := (ht.diff hs).exists_subset_ncard_eq (k - s.ncard)
refine ⟨s ∪ s₁, subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hs₁.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rwa [ncard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hs₁ disjoint_sdiff_right) hs hs₁fin, hs₁card,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le]
theorem exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_ncard {n : ℕ} (hst : 2 * n < (s ∪ t).ncard) :
∃ r : Set α, n < r.ncard ∧ (r ⊆ s ∨ r ⊆ t) := by
classical
have hu := finite_of_ncard_ne_zero ((Nat.zero_le _).trans_lt hst).ne.symm
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hu,
Finite.toFinset_union (hu.subset subset_union_left)
(hu.subset subset_union_right)] at hst
obtain ⟨r', hnr', hr'⟩ := Finset.exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card hst
exact ⟨r', by simpa, by simpa using hr'⟩
/-! ### Explicit description of a set from its cardinality -/
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_one : s.ncard = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; rw [ncard_singleton]⟩
have hft := (finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (ne_zero_of_eq_one h)).fintype
simp_rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card', @Finset.card_eq_one _ (toFinset s)] at h
refine h.imp fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton] at ha
exact ha
theorem exists_eq_insert_iff_ncard (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t) ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s.ncard + 1 = t.ncard := by
classical
rcases t.finite_or_infinite with ht | ht
· rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs, ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ ht,
← @Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset _ _ _ hs ht, ← Finset.exists_eq_insert_iff]
convert Iff.rfl using 2; simp only [Finite.mem_toFinset]
ext x
simp [Finset.ext_iff, Set.ext_iff]
simp only [ht.ncard, exists_prop, add_eq_zero, and_false, iff_false, not_exists, not_and,
reduceCtorEq]
rintro x - rfl
exact ht (hs.insert x)
theorem ncard_le_one (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a = b := by
simp_rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs, Finset.card_le_one, Finite.mem_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem ncard_le_one_iff_subsingleton [Finite s] :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
ncard_le_one <| inferInstanceAs (Finite s)
theorem ncard_le_one_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [ncard_le_one hs]
tauto
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 1,031 | 1,033 | theorem ncard_le_one_iff_eq (hs : s.Finite := by | toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
/-!
# Permutations from a list
A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
When there are duplicate elements in `l`, how and in what arrangement with respect to the other
elements they appear in the list determines the formed permutation.
This is because `List.formPerm` is implemented as a product of `Equiv.swap`s.
That means that presence of a sublist of two adjacent duplicates like `[..., x, x, ...]`
will produce the same permutation as if the adjacent duplicates were not present.
The `List.formPerm` definition is meant to primarily be used with `Nodup l`, so that
the resulting permutation is cyclic (if `l` has at least two elements).
The presence of duplicates in a particular placement can lead `List.formPerm` to produce a
nontrivial permutation that is noncyclic.
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section FormPerm
variable [DecidableEq α] (l : List α)
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
/-- A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
-/
def formPerm : Equiv.Perm α :=
(zipWith Equiv.swap l l.tail).prod
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_nil : formPerm ([] : List α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_singleton (x : α) : formPerm [x] = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_cons (x y : α) (l : List α) :
formPerm (x :: y :: l) = swap x y * formPerm (y :: l) :=
prod_cons
theorem formPerm_pair (x y : α) : formPerm [x, y] = swap x y :=
rfl
theorem mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne : ∀ {l l' : List α} {x : α},
(zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x → x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ l'
| [], _, _ => by simp
| _, [], _ => by simp
| a::l, b::l', x => fun hx ↦
if h : (zipWith swap l l').prod x = x then
(eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self (a := a) (b := b) (x := x) (by simpa [h] using hx)).imp
(by rintro rfl; exact .head _) (by rintro rfl; exact .head _)
else
(mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h).imp (.tail _) (.tail _)
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support' (l l' : List α) :
{ x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := fun _ h ↦ by
simpa using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support [Fintype α] (l l' : List α) :
(zipWith swap l l').prod.support ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using zipWith_swap_prod_support' _ _ hx'
theorem support_formPerm_le' : { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset := by
refine (zipWith_swap_prod_support' l l.tail).trans ?_
simpa [Finset.subset_iff] using tail_subset l
theorem support_formPerm_le [Fintype α] : support (formPerm l) ≤ l.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using support_formPerm_le' _ hx'
variable {l} {x : α}
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne (h : l.formPerm x ≠ x) : x ∈ l := by
simpa [or_iff_left_of_imp mem_of_mem_tail] using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
theorem formPerm_apply_of_not_mem (h : x ∉ l) : formPerm l x = x :=
not_imp_comm.1 mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne h
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem (h : x ∈ l) : formPerm l x ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨y, l⟩
· simp at h
induction' l with z l IH generalizing x y
· simpa using h
· by_cases hx : x ∈ z :: l
· rw [formPerm_cons_cons, mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs
· simp [IH _ hx]
· simp
· simp [*]
· replace h : x = y := Or.resolve_right (mem_cons.1 h) hx
simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, ← h]
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem (h : l.formPerm x ∈ l) : x ∈ l := by
contrapose h
rwa [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_mem_iff_mem : l.formPerm x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ l :=
⟨l.mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem, l.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_concat_apply_last (x y : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: (xs ++ [y])) y = x := by
induction' xs with z xs IH generalizing x y
· simp
· simp [IH]
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getLast (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs)) = x := by
induction' xs using List.reverseRecOn with xs y _ generalizing x <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem_length (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) (x :: xs)[xs.length] = x := by
rw [getElem_cons_length rfl, formPerm_apply_getLast]
theorem formPerm_apply_head (x y : α) (xs : List α) (h : Nodup (x :: y :: xs)) :
formPerm (x :: y :: xs) x = y := by simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h.not_mem]
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem_zero (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (hl : 1 < l.length) :
formPerm l l[0] = l[1] := by
rcases l with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hl
· simp at hl
· rw [getElem_cons_zero, formPerm_apply_head _ _ _ h, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero]
variable (l)
theorem formPerm_eq_head_iff_eq_getLast (x y : α) :
formPerm (y :: l) x = y ↔ x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
Iff.trans (by rw [formPerm_apply_getLast]) (formPerm (y :: l)).injective.eq_iff
theorem formPerm_apply_lt_getElem (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n + 1 < xs.length) :
formPerm xs xs[n] = xs[n + 1] := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing xs
· simpa using formPerm_apply_getElem_zero _ h _
· rcases xs with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, l⟩⟩)
· simp at hn
· rw [formPerm_singleton, getElem_singleton, getElem_singleton, one_apply]
· specialize IH (y :: l) h.of_cons _
· simpa [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn
simp only [swap_apply_eq_iff, coe_mul, formPerm_cons_cons, Function.comp]
simp only [getElem_cons_succ] at *
rw [← IH, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
· intro hx
rw [← hx, IH] at h
simp [getElem_mem] at h
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem (xs : List α) (w : Nodup xs) (i : ℕ) (h : i < xs.length) :
formPerm xs xs[i] =
xs[(i + 1) % xs.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨x, xs⟩
· simp at h
· have : i ≤ xs.length := by
refine Nat.le_of_lt_succ ?_
simpa using h
rcases this.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hn')
· simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_lt_getElem (x :: xs) w _ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hn')]
congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
theorem support_formPerm_of_nodup' (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (h' : ∀ x : α, l ≠ [x]) :
{ x | formPerm l x ≠ x } = l.toFinset := by
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· exact support_formPerm_le' l
· intro x hx
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, mem_toFinset] at hx
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, formPerm_apply_getElem _ h]
intro H
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get, Function.Injective] at h
specialize h H
rcases (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hn).eq_or_lt with hn' | hn'
· simp only [← hn', Nat.mod_self] at h
refine not_exists.mpr h' ?_
rw [← length_eq_one_iff, ← hn', (Fin.mk.inj_iff.mp h).symm]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn'] at h
theorem support_formPerm_of_nodup [Fintype α] (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (h' : ∀ x : α, l ≠ [x]) :
support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset := by
rw [← Finset.coe_inj]
convert support_formPerm_of_nodup' _ h h'
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem formPerm_rotate_one (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) : formPerm (l.rotate 1) = formPerm l := by
have h' : Nodup (l.rotate 1) := by simpa using h
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l.rotate 1
· obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [formPerm_apply_getElem _ h', getElem_rotate l, getElem_rotate l, formPerm_apply_getElem _ h]
simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, formPerm_apply_of_not_mem]
simpa using hx
theorem formPerm_rotate (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) :
formPerm (l.rotate n) = formPerm l := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
rw [← rotate_rotate, formPerm_rotate_one, hn]
rwa [IsRotated.nodup_iff]
exact IsRotated.forall l n
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/List.lean | 230 | 242 | theorem formPerm_eq_of_isRotated {l l' : List α} (hd : Nodup l) (h : l ~r l') :
formPerm l = formPerm l' := by | obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
exact (formPerm_rotate l hd n).symm
theorem formPerm_append_pair : ∀ (l : List α) (a b : α),
formPerm (l ++ [a, b]) = formPerm (l ++ [a]) * swap a b
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| x::y::l, a, b => by
simpa [mul_assoc] using formPerm_append_pair (y::l) a b
theorem formPerm_reverse : ∀ l : List α, formPerm l.reverse = (formPerm l)⁻¹ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rishikesh Vaishnav. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rishikesh Vaishnav
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
/-!
# Conditional Probability
This file defines conditional probability and includes basic results relating to it.
Given some measure `μ` defined on a measure space on some type `Ω` and some `s : Set Ω`,
we define the measure of `μ` conditioned on `s` as the restricted measure scaled by
the inverse of the measure of `s`: `cond μ s = (μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. The scaling
ensures that this is a probability measure (when `μ` is a finite measure).
From this definition, we derive the "axiomatic" definition of conditional probability
based on application: for any `s t : Set Ω`, we have `μ[t|s] = (μ s)⁻¹ * μ (s ∩ t)`.
## Main Statements
* `cond_cond_eq_cond_inter`: conditioning on one set and then another is equivalent
to conditioning on their intersection.
* `cond_eq_inv_mul_cond_mul`: Bayes' Theorem, `μ[t|s] = (μ s)⁻¹ * μ[s|t] * (μ t)`.
## Notations
This file uses the notation `μ[|s]` the measure of `μ` conditioned on `s`,
and `μ[t|s]` for the probability of `t` given `s` under `μ` (equivalent to the
application `μ[|s] t`).
These notations are contained in the locale `ProbabilityTheory`.
## Implementation notes
Because we have the alternative measure restriction application principles
`Measure.restrict_apply` and `Measure.restrict_apply'`, which require
measurability of the restricted and restricting sets, respectively,
many of the theorems here will have corresponding alternatives as well.
For the sake of brevity, we've chosen to only go with `Measure.restrict_apply'`
for now, but the alternative theorems can be added if needed.
Use of `@[simp]` generally follows the rule of removing conditions on a measure
when possible.
Hypotheses that are used to "define" a conditional distribution by requiring that
the conditioning set has non-zero measure should be named using the abbreviation
"c" (which stands for "conditionable") rather than "nz". For example `(hci : μ (s ∩ t) ≠ 0)`
(rather than `hnzi`) should be used for a hypothesis ensuring that `μ[|s ∩ t]` is defined.
## Tags
conditional, conditioned, bayes
-/
noncomputable section
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure MeasurableSpace Set
variable {Ω Ω' α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {m' : MeasurableSpace Ω'} {μ : Measure Ω}
{s t : Set Ω}
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable (μ) in
/-- The conditional probability measure of measure `μ` on set `s` is `μ` restricted to `s`
and scaled by the inverse of `μ s` (to make it a probability measure):
`(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. -/
def cond (s : Set Ω) : Measure Ω :=
(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s
@[inherit_doc ProbabilityTheory.cond]
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[|" s:term "]" : term =>
`(ProbabilityTheory.cond $μ $s)
@[inherit_doc cond]
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[" t:term " | " s:term "]" : term =>
`(ProbabilityTheory.cond $μ $s $t)
/-!
We can't use `notation` or `notation3` as it does not support `noWs`, and so we have to write
our own delaborators.
-/
section delaborators
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
/-- Unexpander for `μ[|s]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander ProbabilityTheory.cond]
def condUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $μ $s) => `($μ[|$s])
| _ => throw ()
/-- info: μ[|s] : Measure Ω -/
#guard_msgs in
#check μ[|s]
/-- Delaborator for `μ[t|s]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def delabCondApplied : Delab :=
whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 6 do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity' ``DFunLike.coe 6
guard <| (e.getArg!' 4).isAppOf' ``ProbabilityTheory.cond
let t ← withAppArg delab
withAppFn <| withAppArg do
let μ ← withNaryArg 2 delab
let s ← withNaryArg 3 delab
`($μ[$t|$s])
/-- info: μ[t | s] : ℝ≥0∞ -/
#guard_msgs in
#check μ[t | s]
/-- info: μ[t | s] : ℝ≥0∞ -/
#guard_msgs in
#check μ[|s] t
end delaborators
/-- The conditional probability measure of measure `μ` on `{ω | X ω ∈ s}`.
It is `μ` restricted to `{ω | X ω ∈ s}` and scaled by the inverse of `μ {ω | X ω ∈ s}`
(to make it a probability measure): `(μ {ω | X ω ∈ s})⁻¹ • μ.restrict {ω | X ω ∈ s}`. -/
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[|" X:term " in " s:term "]" : term => `($μ[|$X ⁻¹' $s])
/-- The conditional probability measure of measure `μ` on set `{ω | X ω = x}`.
It is `μ` restricted to `{ω | X ω = x}` and scaled by the inverse of `μ {ω | X ω = x}`
(to make it a probability measure): `(μ {ω | X ω = x})⁻¹ • μ.restrict {ω | X ω = x}`. -/
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[" s:term " | " X:term " in " t:term "]" : term =>
`($μ[$s | $X ⁻¹' $t])
/-- The conditional probability measure of measure `μ` on `{ω | X ω = x}`.
It is `μ` restricted to `{ω | X ω = x}` and scaled by the inverse of `μ {ω | X ω = x}`
(to make it a probability measure): `(μ {ω | X ω = x})⁻¹ • μ.restrict {ω | X ω = x}`. -/
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[|" X:term " ← " x:term "]" : term => `($μ[|$X in {$x:term}])
/-- The conditional probability measure of measure `μ` on set `{ω | X ω = x}`.
It is `μ` restricted to `{ω | X ω = x}` and scaled by the inverse of `μ {ω | X ω = x}`
(to make it a probability measure): `(μ {ω | X ω = x})⁻¹ • μ.restrict {ω | X ω = x}`. -/
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[" s:term " | " X:term " ← " x:term "]" : term =>
`($μ[$s | $X in {$x:term}])
/-- The conditional probability measure of any measure on any set of finite positive measure
is a probability measure. -/
theorem cond_isProbabilityMeasure_of_finite (hcs : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
IsProbabilityMeasure μ[|s] :=
⟨by
unfold ProbabilityTheory.cond
simp only [Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul]
exact ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hcs hs⟩
/-- The conditional probability measure of any finite measure on any set of positive measure
is a probability measure. -/
theorem cond_isProbabilityMeasure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hcs : μ s ≠ 0) :
IsProbabilityMeasure μ[|s] := cond_isProbabilityMeasure_of_finite hcs (measure_ne_top μ s)
instance : IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μ[|s] := by
constructor
simp only [cond, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply,
univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
rcases eq_or_ne (μ s) 0 with h | h
· simp [h]
rcases eq_or_ne (μ s) ∞ with h' | h'
· simp [h']
simp [ENNReal.div_self h h']
variable (μ) in
theorem cond_toMeasurable_eq :
μ[|(toMeasurable μ s)] = μ[|s] := by
unfold cond
by_cases hnt : μ s = ∞
· simp [hnt]
· simp [Measure.restrict_toMeasurable hnt]
lemma cond_absolutelyContinuous : μ[|s] ≪ μ :=
smul_absolutelyContinuous.trans restrict_le_self.absolutelyContinuous
lemma absolutelyContinuous_cond_univ [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : μ ≪ μ[|univ] := by
rw [cond, restrict_univ]
refine absolutelyContinuous_smul ?_
simp [measure_ne_top]
lemma ae_cond_mem₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ[|s], x ∈ s :=
ae_smul_measure (ae_restrict_mem₀ hs) _
lemma ae_cond_mem (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ[|s], x ∈ s :=
ae_smul_measure (ae_restrict_mem hs) _
section Bayes
variable (μ) in
@[simp] lemma cond_empty : μ[|∅] = 0 := by simp [cond]
variable (μ) in
@[simp] lemma cond_univ [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ[|Set.univ] = μ := by
simp [cond, measure_univ, Measure.restrict_univ]
@[simp] lemma cond_eq_zero : μ[|s] = 0 ↔ μ s = ∞ ∨ μ s = 0 := by simp [cond]
lemma cond_eq_zero_of_meas_eq_zero (hμs : μ s = 0) : μ[|s] = 0 := by simp [hμs]
/-- The axiomatic definition of conditional probability derived from a measure-theoretic one. -/
| Mathlib/Probability/ConditionalProbability.lean | 207 | 209 | theorem cond_apply (hms : MeasurableSet s) (μ : Measure Ω) (t : Set Ω) :
μ[t|s] = (μ s)⁻¹ * μ (s ∩ t) := by | rw [cond, Measure.smul_apply, Measure.restrict_apply' hms, Set.inter_comm, smul_eq_mul] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
/-!
# Coverages
A coverage `K` on a category `C` is a set of presieves associated to every object `X : C`,
called "covering presieves".
This collection must satisfy a certain "pullback compatibility" condition, saying that
whenever `S` is a covering presieve on `X` and `f : Y ⟶ X` is a morphism, then there exists
some covering sieve `T` on `Y` such that `T` factors through `S` along `f`.
The main difference between a coverage and a Grothendieck pretopology is that we *do not*
require `C` to have pullbacks.
This is useful, for example, when we want to consider the Grothendieck topology on the category
of extremally disconnected sets in the context of condensed mathematics.
A more concrete example: If `ℬ` is a basis for a topology on a type `X` (in the sense of
`TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis`) then it naturally induces a coverage on `Opens X`
whose associated Grothendieck topology is the one induced by the topology
on `X` generated by `ℬ`. (Project: Formalize this!)
## Main Definitions and Results:
All definitions are in the `CategoryTheory` namespace.
- `Coverage C`: The type of coverages on `C`.
- `Coverage.ofGrothendieck C`: A function which associates a coverage to any Grothendieck topology.
- `Coverage.toGrothendieck C`: A function which associates a Grothendieck topology to any coverage.
- `Coverage.gi`: The two functions above form a Galois insertion.
- `Presieve.isSheaf_coverage`: Given `K : Coverage C` with associated
Grothendieck topology `J`, a `Type*`-valued presheaf on `C` is a sheaf for `K` if and only if
it is a sheaf for `J`.
# References
We don't follow any particular reference, but the arguments can probably be distilled from
the following sources:
- [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.1.
- [nLab, *Coverage*](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/coverage)
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C D : Type _} [Category C] [Category D]
open Limits
namespace Presieve
/--
Given a morphism `f : Y ⟶ X`, a presieve `S` on `Y` and presieve `T` on `X`,
we say that *`S` factors through `T` along `f`*, written `S.FactorsThruAlong T f`,
provided that for any morphism `g : Z ⟶ Y` in `S`, there exists some
morphism `e : W ⟶ X` in `T` and some morphism `i : Z ⟶ W` such that the obvious
square commutes: `i ≫ e = g ≫ f`.
This is used in the definition of a coverage.
-/
def FactorsThruAlong {X Y : C} (S : Presieve Y) (T : Presieve X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Z : C⦄ ⦃g : Z ⟶ Y⦄, S g →
∃ (W : C) (i : Z ⟶ W) (e : W ⟶ X), T e ∧ i ≫ e = g ≫ f
/--
Given `S T : Presieve X`, we say that `S` factors through `T` if any morphism in `S`
factors through some morphism in `T`.
The lemma `Presieve.isSheafFor_of_factorsThru` gives a *sufficient* condition for a
presheaf to be a sheaf for a presieve `T`, in terms of `S.FactorsThru T`, provided
that the presheaf is a sheaf for `S`.
-/
def FactorsThru {X : C} (S T : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Z : C⦄ ⦃g : Z ⟶ X⦄, S g →
∃ (W : C) (i : Z ⟶ W) (e : W ⟶ X), T e ∧ i ≫ e = g
@[simp]
lemma factorsThruAlong_id {X : C} (S T : Presieve X) :
S.FactorsThruAlong T (𝟙 X) ↔ S.FactorsThru T := by
simp [FactorsThruAlong, FactorsThru]
lemma factorsThru_of_le {X : C} (S T : Presieve X) (h : S ≤ T) :
S.FactorsThru T :=
fun Y g hg => ⟨Y, 𝟙 _, g, h _ hg, by simp⟩
lemma le_of_factorsThru_sieve {X : C} (S : Presieve X) (T : Sieve X) (h : S.FactorsThru T) :
S ≤ T := by
rintro Y f hf
obtain ⟨W, i, e, h1, rfl⟩ := h hf
exact T.downward_closed h1 _
lemma factorsThru_top {X : C} (S : Presieve X) : S.FactorsThru ⊤ :=
factorsThru_of_le _ _ le_top
lemma isSheafFor_of_factorsThru
{X : C} {S T : Presieve X}
(P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type*)
(H : S.FactorsThru T) (hS : S.IsSheafFor P)
(h : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, T f → ∃ (R : Presieve Y),
R.IsSeparatedFor P ∧ R.FactorsThruAlong S f) :
T.IsSheafFor P := by
simp only [← Presieve.isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor] at *
choose W i e h1 h2 using H
refine ⟨?_, fun x hx => ?_⟩
· intro x y₁ y₂ h₁ h₂
refine hS.1.ext (fun Y g hg => ?_)
simp only [← h2 hg, op_comp, P.map_comp, types_comp_apply, h₁ _ (h1 _ ), h₂ _ (h1 _)]
let y : S.FamilyOfElements P := fun Y g hg => P.map (i _).op (x (e hg) (h1 _))
have hy : y.Compatible := by
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ h
rw [← types_comp_apply (P.map (i h₁).op) (P.map g₁.op),
← types_comp_apply (P.map (i h₂).op) (P.map g₂.op),
← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp]
apply hx
simp only [h2, h, Category.assoc]
let ⟨_, h2'⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := h2' y hy
refine ⟨z, fun Y g hg => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨R, hR1, hR2⟩ := h hg
choose WW ii ee hh1 hh2 using hR2
refine hR1.ext (fun Q t ht => ?_)
rw [← types_comp_apply (P.map g.op) (P.map t.op), ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, ← hh2 ht,
op_comp, P.map_comp, types_comp_apply, hz _ (hh1 _),
← types_comp_apply _ (P.map (ii ht).op), ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp]
apply hx
simp only [Category.assoc, h2, hh2]
end Presieve
variable (C) in
/--
The type `Coverage C` of coverages on `C`.
A coverage is a collection of *covering* presieves on every object `X : C`,
which satisfies a *pullback compatibility* condition.
Explicitly, this condition says that whenever `S` is a covering presieve for `X` and
`f : Y ⟶ X` is a morphism, then there exists some covering presieve `T` for `Y`
such that `T` factors through `S` along `f`.
-/
@[ext]
structure Coverage where
/-- The collection of covering presieves for an object `X`. -/
covering : ∀ (X : C), Set (Presieve X)
/-- Given any covering sieve `S` on `X` and a morphism `f : Y ⟶ X`, there exists
some covering sieve `T` on `Y` such that `T` factors through `S` along `f`. -/
pullback : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : Presieve X) (_ : S ∈ covering X),
∃ (T : Presieve Y), T ∈ covering Y ∧ T.FactorsThruAlong S f
namespace Coverage
instance : CoeFun (Coverage C) (fun _ => (X : C) → Set (Presieve X)) where
coe := covering
variable (C) in
/--
Associate a coverage to any Grothendieck topology.
If `J` is a Grothendieck topology, and `K` is the associated coverage, then a presieve
`S` is a covering presieve for `K` if and only if the sieve that it generates is a
covering sieve for `J`.
-/
def ofGrothendieck (J : GrothendieckTopology C) : Coverage C where
covering X := { S | Sieve.generate S ∈ J X }
pullback := by
intro X Y f S (hS : Sieve.generate S ∈ J X)
refine ⟨(Sieve.generate S).pullback f, ?_, fun Z g h => h⟩
dsimp
rw [Sieve.generate_sieve]
exact J.pullback_stable _ hS
lemma ofGrothendieck_iff {X : C} {S : Presieve X} (J : GrothendieckTopology C) :
S ∈ ofGrothendieck _ J X ↔ Sieve.generate S ∈ J X := Iff.rfl
/--
An auxiliary definition used to define the Grothendieck topology associated to a
coverage. See `Coverage.toGrothendieck`.
-/
inductive Saturate (K : Coverage C) : (X : C) → Sieve X → Prop where
| of (X : C) (S : Presieve X) (hS : S ∈ K X) : Saturate K X (Sieve.generate S)
| top (X : C) : Saturate K X ⊤
| transitive (X : C) (R S : Sieve X) :
Saturate K X R →
(∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, R f → Saturate K Y (S.pullback f)) →
Saturate K X S
lemma eq_top_pullback {X Y : C} {S T : Sieve X} (h : S ≤ T) (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : S f) :
T.pullback f = ⊤ := by
ext Z g
simp only [Sieve.pullback_apply, Sieve.top_apply, iff_true]
apply h
apply S.downward_closed
exact hf
lemma saturate_of_superset (K : Coverage C) {X : C} {S T : Sieve X} (h : S ≤ T)
(hS : Saturate K X S) : Saturate K X T := by
apply Saturate.transitive _ _ _ hS
intro Y g hg
rw [eq_top_pullback (h := h)]
· apply Saturate.top
· assumption
variable (C) in
/--
The Grothendieck topology associated to a coverage `K`.
It is defined *inductively* as follows:
1. If `S` is a covering presieve for `K`, then the sieve generated by `S` is a covering
sieve for the associated Grothendieck topology.
2. The top sieves are in the associated Grothendieck topology.
3. Add all sieves required by the *local character* axiom of a Grothendieck topology.
The pullback compatibility condition for a coverage ensures that the
associated Grothendieck topology is pullback stable, and so an additional constructor
in the inductive construction is not needed.
-/
def toGrothendieck (K : Coverage C) : GrothendieckTopology C where
sieves := Saturate K
top_mem' := .top
pullback_stable' := by
intro X Y S f hS
induction hS generalizing Y with
| of X S hS =>
obtain ⟨R,hR1,hR2⟩ := K.pullback f S hS
suffices Sieve.generate R ≤ (Sieve.generate S).pullback f from
saturate_of_superset _ this (Saturate.of _ _ hR1)
rintro Z g ⟨W, i, e, h1, h2⟩
obtain ⟨WW, ii, ee, hh1, hh2⟩ := hR2 h1
refine ⟨WW, i ≫ ii, ee, hh1, ?_⟩
simp only [hh2, reassoc_of% h2, Category.assoc]
| top X => apply Saturate.top
| transitive X R S _ hS H1 _ =>
apply Saturate.transitive
· apply H1 f
intro Z g hg
rw [← Sieve.pullback_comp]
exact hS hg
transitive' _ _ hS _ hR := .transitive _ _ _ hS hR
instance : PartialOrder (Coverage C) where
le A B := A.covering ≤ B.covering
le_refl _ _ := le_refl _
le_trans _ _ _ h1 h2 X := le_trans (h1 X) (h2 X)
le_antisymm _ _ h1 h2 := Coverage.ext <| funext <|
fun X => le_antisymm (h1 X) (h2 X)
variable (C) in
/--
The two constructions `Coverage.toGrothendieck` and `Coverage.ofGrothendieck` form
a Galois insertion.
-/
def gi : GaloisInsertion (toGrothendieck C) (ofGrothendieck C) where
choice K _ := toGrothendieck _ K
choice_eq := fun _ _ => rfl
le_l_u J X S hS := by
rw [← Sieve.generate_sieve S]
apply Saturate.of
dsimp [ofGrothendieck]
rwa [Sieve.generate_sieve S]
gc K J := by
constructor
· intro H X S hS
exact H _ <| Saturate.of _ _ hS
· intro H X S hS
induction hS with
| of X S hS => exact H _ hS
| top => apply J.top_mem
| transitive X R S _ _ H1 H2 => exact J.transitive H1 _ H2
/--
An alternative characterization of the Grothendieck topology associated to a coverage `K`:
it is the infimum of all Grothendieck topologies whose associated coverage contains `K`.
-/
theorem toGrothendieck_eq_sInf (K : Coverage C) : toGrothendieck _ K =
sInf {J | K ≤ ofGrothendieck _ J } := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_sInf; intro J hJ
intro X S hS
induction hS with
| of X S hS => apply hJ; assumption
| top => apply J.top_mem
| transitive X R S _ _ H1 H2 => exact J.transitive H1 _ H2
· apply sInf_le
intro X S hS
apply Saturate.of _ _ hS
instance : SemilatticeSup (Coverage C) where
sup x y :=
{ covering := fun B ↦ x.covering B ∪ y.covering B
pullback := by
rintro X Y f S (hx | hy)
· obtain ⟨T, hT⟩ := x.pullback f S hx
exact ⟨T, Or.inl hT.1, hT.2⟩
· obtain ⟨T, hT⟩ := y.pullback f S hy
exact ⟨T, Or.inr hT.1, hT.2⟩ }
toPartialOrder := inferInstance
le_sup_left _ _ _ := Set.subset_union_left
le_sup_right _ _ _ := Set.subset_union_right
sup_le _ _ _ hx hy X := Set.union_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hx X, hy X⟩
@[simp]
lemma sup_covering (x y : Coverage C) (B : C) :
(x ⊔ y).covering B = x.covering B ∪ y.covering B :=
rfl
/--
Any sieve that contains a covering presieve for a coverage is a covering sieve for the associated
Grothendieck topology.
-/
theorem mem_toGrothendieck_sieves_of_superset (K : Coverage C) {X : C} {S : Sieve X}
{R : Presieve X} (h : R ≤ S) (hR : R ∈ K.covering X) : S ∈ (K.toGrothendieck C) X :=
K.saturate_of_superset ((Sieve.generate_le_iff _ _).mpr h) (Coverage.Saturate.of X _ hR)
end Coverage
open Coverage
namespace Presieve
/--
The main theorem of this file: Given a coverage `K` on `C`,
a `Type*`-valued presheaf on `C` is a sheaf for `K` if and only if it is a sheaf for
the associated Grothendieck topology.
-/
theorem isSheaf_coverage (K : Coverage C) (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type*) :
Presieve.IsSheaf (toGrothendieck _ K) P ↔
(∀ {X : C} (R : Presieve X), R ∈ K X → Presieve.IsSheafFor P R) := by
constructor
· intro H X R hR
rw [Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_generate]
apply H _ <| Saturate.of _ _ hR
· intro H X S hS
-- This is the key point of the proof:
-- We must generalize the induction in the correct way.
suffices ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), Presieve.IsSheafFor P (S.pullback f).arrows by
simpa using this (f := 𝟙 _)
induction hS with
| of X S hS =>
intro Y f
obtain ⟨T, hT1, hT2⟩ := K.pullback f S hS
apply Presieve.isSheafFor_of_factorsThru (S := T)
· intro Z g hg
obtain ⟨W, i, e, h1, h2⟩ := hT2 hg
exact ⟨Z, 𝟙 _, g, ⟨W, i, e, h1, h2⟩, by simp⟩
· apply H; assumption
· intro Z g _
obtain ⟨R, hR1, hR2⟩ := K.pullback g _ hT1
exact ⟨R, (H _ hR1).isSeparatedFor, hR2⟩
| top => intros; simpa using Presieve.isSheafFor_top_sieve _
| transitive X R S _ _ H1 H2 =>
intro Y f
simp only [← Presieve.isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor] at *
choose H1 H1' using H1
choose H2 H2' using H2
refine ⟨?_, fun x hx => ?_⟩
· intro x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂
refine (H1 f).ext (fun Z g hg => ?_)
refine (H2 hg (𝟙 _)).ext (fun ZZ gg hgg => ?_)
simp only [Sieve.pullback_id, Sieve.pullback_apply] at hgg
simp only [← types_comp_apply]
rw [← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, h₁, h₂]
simpa only [Sieve.pullback_apply, Category.assoc] using hgg
let y : ∀ ⦃Z : C⦄ (g : Z ⟶ Y),
((S.pullback (g ≫ f)).pullback (𝟙 _)).arrows.FamilyOfElements P :=
fun Z g ZZ gg hgg => x (gg ≫ g) (by simpa using hgg)
have hy : ∀ ⦃Z : C⦄ (g : Z ⟶ Y), (y g).Compatible := by
intro Z g Y₁ Y₂ ZZ g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ h
rw [hx]
rw [reassoc_of% h]
choose z hz using fun ⦃Z : C⦄ ⦃g : Z ⟶ Y⦄ (hg : R.pullback f g) =>
H2' hg (𝟙 _) (y g) (hy g)
let q : (R.pullback f).arrows.FamilyOfElements P := fun Z g hg => z hg
have hq : q.Compatible := by
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ h
apply (H2 h₁ g₁).ext
intro ZZ gg hgg
simp only [← types_comp_apply]
rw [← P.map_comp, ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, ← op_comp, hz, hz]
· dsimp [y]; congr 1; simp only [Category.assoc, h]
· simpa [reassoc_of% h] using hgg
· simpa using hgg
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := H1' f q hq
refine ⟨t, fun Z g hg => ?_⟩
refine (H1 (g ≫ f)).ext (fun ZZ gg hgg => ?_)
rw [← types_comp_apply _ (P.map gg.op), ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, ht]
on_goal 2 => simpa using hgg
refine (H2 hgg (𝟙 _)).ext (fun ZZZ ggg hggg => ?_)
rw [← types_comp_apply _ (P.map ggg.op), ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, hz]
on_goal 2 => simpa using hggg
refine (H2 hgg ggg).ext (fun ZZZZ gggg _ => ?_)
rw [← types_comp_apply _ (P.map gggg.op), ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp]
apply hx
simp
/--
A presheaf is a sheaf for the Grothendieck topology generated by a union of coverages iff it is a
sheaf for the Grothendieck topology generated by each coverage separately.
-/
theorem isSheaf_sup (K L : Coverage C) (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type*) :
(Presieve.IsSheaf ((K ⊔ L).toGrothendieck C)) P ↔
(Presieve.IsSheaf (K.toGrothendieck C)) P ∧ (Presieve.IsSheaf (L.toGrothendieck C)) P := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨Presieve.isSheaf_of_le _ ((gi C).gc.monotone_l le_sup_left) h,
Presieve.isSheaf_of_le _ ((gi C).gc.monotone_l le_sup_right) h⟩, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [isSheaf_coverage, isSheaf_coverage] at h
rw [isSheaf_coverage]
intro X R hR
rcases hR with hR | hR
· exact h.1 R hR
· exact h.2 R hR
end Presieve
namespace Presheaf
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coverage.lean | 416 | 422 | theorem isSheaf_iff_isLimit_coverage (K : Coverage C) (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
Presheaf.IsSheaf (toGrothendieck _ K) P ↔ ∀ ⦃X : C⦄ (R : Presieve X),
R ∈ K.covering X →
Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone (Sieve.generate R).arrows.cocone.op)) := by | simp only [Presheaf.IsSheaf, Presieve.isSheaf_coverage, isLimit_iff_isSheafFor,
← Presieve.isSheafFor_iff_generate]
aesop |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.OrderedMonoid
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
/-!
# Prime factors of nonzero naturals
This file defines the factorization of a nonzero natural number `n` as a multiset of primes,
the multiplicity of `p` in this factors multiset being the p-adic valuation of `n`.
## Main declarations
* `PrimeMultiset`: Type of multisets of prime numbers.
* `FactorMultiset n`: Multiset of prime factors of `n`.
-/
/-- The type of multisets of prime numbers. Unique factorization
gives an equivalence between this set and ℕ+, as we will formalize
below. -/
def PrimeMultiset :=
Multiset Nat.Primes deriving Inhabited, AddCommMonoid, DistribLattice,
SemilatticeSup, Sub
-- The `CanonicallyOrderedAdd, OrderBot, OrderedSub` instances should be constructed by a deriving
-- handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (CanonicallyOrderedAdd (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderBot PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderedSub PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (Multiset Nat.Primes))
namespace PrimeMultiset
-- `@[derive]` doesn't work for `meta` instances
unsafe instance : Repr PrimeMultiset := by delta PrimeMultiset; infer_instance
/-- The multiset consisting of a single prime -/
def ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : PrimeMultiset :=
({p} : Multiset Nat.Primes)
theorem card_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : Multiset.card (ofPrime p) = 1 :=
rfl
/-- We can forget the primality property and regard a multiset
of primes as just a multiset of positive integers, or a multiset
of natural numbers. In the opposite direction, if we have a
multiset of positive integers or natural numbers, together with
a proof that all the elements are prime, then we can regard it
as a multiset of primes. The next block of results records
obvious properties of these coercions.
-/
def toNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coeNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨toNatMultiset⟩
/-- `PrimeMultiset.coe`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of
naturals, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeNatMonoidHom : (coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_nat_injective
theorem coeNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ) = {(p : ℕ)} :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
/-- Converts a `PrimeMultiset` to a `Multiset ℕ+`. -/
def toPNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coePNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ+) :=
⟨toPNatMultiset⟩
/-- `coePNat`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of positive
naturals, regarded as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ+ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coePNatMonoidHom : (coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_injective
theorem coePNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ+) = {(p : ℕ+)} :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ+) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ+)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
instance coeMultisetPNatNat : Coe (Multiset ℕ+) (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨fun v => v.map (↑)⟩
theorem coePNat_nat (v : PrimeMultiset) : ((v : Multiset ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ) := by
change (v.map ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+)).map Subtype.val = v.map Subtype.val
rw [Multiset.map_map]
congr
/-- The product of a `PrimeMultiset`, as a `ℕ+`. -/
def prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : ℕ+ :=
(v : Multiset PNat).prod
theorem coe_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : (v.prod : ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ).prod := by
have h : (v.prod : ℕ) = ((v.map (↑) : Multiset ℕ+).map (↑)).prod :=
PNat.coeMonoidHom.map_multiset_prod v.toPNatMultiset
simpa [Multiset.map_map] using h
theorem prod_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p).prod = (p : ℕ+) :=
Multiset.prod_singleton _
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ Nat.Primes Nat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨p, hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) : (ofNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ) = v := by
dsimp [ofNatMultiset, toNatMultiset]
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id']
theorem prod_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) :
((ofNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ) = (v.prod : ℕ) := by rw [coe_prod, to_ofNatMultiset]
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ+ Nat.Primes PNat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨(p : ℕ), hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ+) = v := by
dsimp [ofPNatMultiset, toPNatMultiset]
have : (fun (p : ℕ+) (h : p.Prime) => ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) ⟨p, h⟩) = fun p _ => id p := by
funext p h
apply Subtype.eq
rfl
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, this, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id]
theorem prod_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : ((ofPNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ+) = v.prod := by
dsimp [prod]
rw [to_ofPNatMultiset]
/-- Lists can be coerced to multisets; here we have some results
about how this interacts with our constructions on multisets. -/
def ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
theorem prod_ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h) : ((ofNatList l h).prod : ℕ) = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- If a `List ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset` with
the coercion from lists to multisets. -/
def ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
theorem prod_ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatList l h).prod = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- The product map gives a homomorphism from the additive monoid
of multisets to the multiplicative monoid ℕ+. -/
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Factors.lean | 184 | 186 | theorem prod_zero : (0 : PrimeMultiset).prod = 1 := by | exact Multiset.prod_zero |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Julian Kuelshammer, Heather Macbeth, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Chebyshev polynomials
The Chebyshev polynomials are families of polynomials indexed by `ℤ`,
with integral coefficients.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.U`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C`: the rescaled Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind (also known as the
Vieta–Lucas polynomials), given by $C_n(2x) = 2T_n(x)$.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.S`: the rescaled Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind (also known as the
Vieta–Fibonacci polynomials), given by $S_n(2x) = U_n(x)$.
## Main statements
* The formal derivative of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind is a scalar multiple of the
Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul_T`, twice the product of the `m`-th and `k`-th Chebyshev polynomials
of the first kind is the sum of the `m + k`-th and `m - k`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first
kind. There is a similar statement `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C_mul_C` for the `C` polynomials.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul`, the `(m * n)`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is the
composition of the `m`-th and `n`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. There is a similar
statement `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C_mul` for the `C` polynomials.
## Implementation details
Since Chebyshev polynomials have interesting behaviour over the complex numbers and modulo `p`,
we define them to have coefficients in an arbitrary commutative ring, even though
technically `ℤ` would suffice.
The benefit of allowing arbitrary coefficient rings, is that the statements afterwards are clean,
and do not have `map (Int.castRingHom R)` interfering all the time.
## References
[Lionel Ponton, _Roots of the Chebyshev polynomials: A purely algebraic approach_]
[ponton2020chebyshev]
## TODO
* Redefine and/or relate the definition of Chebyshev polynomials to `LinearRecurrence`.
* Add explicit formula involving square roots for Chebyshev polynomials
* Compute zeroes and extrema of Chebyshev polynomials.
* Prove that the roots of the Chebyshev polynomials (except 0) are irrational.
* Prove minimax properties of Chebyshev polynomials.
-/
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
open Polynomial
variable (R R' : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing R']
/-- `T n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def T : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * T (n + 1) - T n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * T (-n) - T (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
/-- Induction principle used for proving facts about Chebyshev polynomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induct (motive : ℤ → Prop)
(zero : motive 0)
(one : motive 1)
(add_two : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (↑n + 1) → motive ↑n → motive (↑n + 2))
(neg_add_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (-↑n) → motive (-↑n + 1) → motive (-↑n - 1)) :
∀ (a : ℤ), motive a :=
T.induct motive zero one add_two fun n hn hnm => by
simpa only [Int.negSucc_eq, neg_add] using neg_add_one n hn hnm
@[simp]
theorem T_add_two : ∀ n, T R (n + 2) = 2 * X * T R (n + 1) - T R n
| (k : ℕ) => T.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) T.eq_4 R k
theorem T_add_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_sub_two (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 2) = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem T_sub_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_eq (n : ℤ) : T R n = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
@[simp]
theorem T_zero : T R 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem T_one : T R 1 = X := rfl
theorem T_neg_one : T R (-1) = X := show 2 * X * 1 - X = X by ring
theorem T_two : T R 2 = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
simpa [pow_two, mul_assoc] using T_add_two R 0
@[simp]
theorem T_neg (n : ℤ) : T R (-n) = T R n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => rfl
| one => show 2 * X * 1 - X = X; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_two R n
have h₂ := T_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X : R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 - h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_one R n
have h₂ := T_sub_one R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X : R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ - h₂
theorem T_natAbs (n : ℤ) : T R n.natAbs = T R n := by
obtain h | h := Int.natAbs_eq n <;> nth_rw 2 [h]; simp
theorem T_neg_two : T R (-2) = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by simp [T_two]
@[simp]
theorem T_eval_one (n : ℤ) : (T R n).eval 1 = 1 := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 => simp [T_add_two, ih1, ih2]; norm_num
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 => simp [T_sub_one, -T_neg, ih1, ih2]; norm_num
@[simp]
theorem T_eval_neg_one (n : ℤ) : (T R n).eval (-1) = n.negOnePow := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_add_two, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_neg, mul_one, ih1,
Int.negOnePow_add, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.val_neg, Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg, ih2,
Int.negOnePow_def 2]
norm_cast
norm_num
ring
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_sub_one, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_neg, mul_one, ih1, neg_mul,
ih2, Int.negOnePow_add, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.val_neg, Int.cast_neg, sub_neg_eq_add,
Int.negOnePow_sub]
ring
/-- `U n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def U : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => 2 * X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * U (n + 1) - U n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * U (-n) - U (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_add_two : ∀ n, U R (n + 2) = 2 * X * U R (n + 1) - U R n
| (k : ℕ) => U.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) U.eq_4 R k
theorem U_add_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 2) = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem U_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_eq (n : ℤ) : U R n = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
@[simp]
theorem U_zero : U R 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem U_one : U R 1 = 2 * X := rfl
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_one : U R (-1) = 0 := by simpa using U_sub_one R 0
theorem U_two : U R 2 = 4 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
have := U_add_two R 0
simp only [zero_add, U_one, U_zero] at this
linear_combination this
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_two : U R (-2) = -1 := by
simpa [zero_sub, Int.reduceNeg, U_neg_one, mul_zero, U_zero] using U_sub_two R 0
theorem U_neg_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 1) = -U R (n - 1) := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_one R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n - 1)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X : R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_eq R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X : R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
theorem U_neg (n : ℤ) : U R (-n) = -U R (n - 2) := by simpa [sub_sub] using U_neg_sub_one R (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 2) = -U R n := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] using U_neg R (n + 2)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Chebyshev.lean | 226 | 230 | theorem U_eval_one (n : ℤ) : (U R n).eval 1 = n + 1 := by | induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp; norm_num
| add_two n ih1 ih2 => |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.BirkhoffSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
/-!
# Birkhoff average
In this file we define `birkhoffAverage f g n x` to be
$$
\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}g(f^{[k]}(x)),
$$
where `f : α → α` is a self-map on some type `α`,
`g : α → M` is a function from `α` to a module over a division semiring `R`,
and `R` is used to formalize division by `n` as `(n : R)⁻¹ • _`.
While we need an auxiliary division semiring `R` to define `birkhoffAverage`,
the definition does not depend on the choice of `R`,
see `birkhoffAverage_congr_ring`.
-/
open Finset
section birkhoffAverage
variable (R : Type*) {α M : Type*} [DivisionSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- The average value of `g` on the first `n` points of the orbit of `x` under `f`,
i.e. the Birkhoff sum `∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, g (f^[k] x)` divided by `n`.
This average appears in many ergodic theorems
which say that `(birkhoffAverage R f g · x)`
converges to the "space average" `⨍ x, g x ∂μ` as `n → ∞`.
We use an auxiliary `[DivisionSemiring R]` to define division by `n`.
However, the definition does not depend on the choice of `R`,
see `birkhoffAverage_congr_ring`. -/
def birkhoffAverage (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : M := (n : R)⁻¹ • birkhoffSum f g n x
theorem birkhoffAverage_zero (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) :
birkhoffAverage R f g 0 x = 0 := by simp [birkhoffAverage]
@[simp] theorem birkhoffAverage_zero' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffAverage R f g 0 = 0 :=
funext <| birkhoffAverage_zero _ _ _
| Mathlib/Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Average.lean | 50 | 51 | theorem birkhoffAverage_one (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) :
birkhoffAverage R f g 1 x = g x := by | simp [birkhoffAverage] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.LatticeIntervals
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
/-! # Subtypes of conditionally complete linear orders
In this file we give conditions on a subset of a conditionally complete linear order, to ensure that
the subtype is itself conditionally complete.
We check that an `OrdConnected` set satisfies these conditions.
## TODO
Add appropriate instances for all `Set.Ixx`. This requires a refactor that will allow different
default values for `sSup` and `sInf`.
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} (s : Set α)
section SupSet
variable [Preorder α] [SupSet α]
open Classical in
/-- `SupSet` structure on a nonempty subset `s` of a preorder with `SupSet`. This definition is
non-canonical (it uses `default s`); it should be used only as here, as an auxiliary instance in the
construction of the `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder` structure. -/
noncomputable def subsetSupSet [Inhabited s] : SupSet s where
sSup t :=
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove t ∧ sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩
else default
attribute [local instance] subsetSupSet
open Classical in
@[simp]
theorem subset_sSup_def [Inhabited s] :
@sSup s _ = fun t =>
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove t ∧ sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩
else default :=
rfl
theorem subset_sSup_of_within [Inhabited s] {t : Set s}
(h' : t.Nonempty) (h'' : BddAbove t) (h : sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s) :
sSup ((↑) '' t : Set α) = (@sSup s _ t : α) := by simp [dif_pos, h, h', h'']
theorem subset_sSup_emptyset [Inhabited s] :
sSup (∅ : Set s) = default := by
simp [sSup]
theorem subset_sSup_of_not_bddAbove [Inhabited s] {t : Set s} (ht : ¬BddAbove t) :
sSup t = default := by
simp [sSup, ht]
end SupSet
section InfSet
variable [Preorder α] [InfSet α]
open Classical in
/-- `InfSet` structure on a nonempty subset `s` of a preorder with `InfSet`. This definition is
non-canonical (it uses `default s`); it should be used only as here, as an auxiliary instance in the
construction of the `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder` structure. -/
noncomputable def subsetInfSet [Inhabited s] : InfSet s where
sInf t :=
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow t ∧ sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩
else default
attribute [local instance] subsetInfSet
open Classical in
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInf_def [Inhabited s] :
@sInf s _ = fun t =>
if ht : t.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow t ∧ sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s
then ⟨sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α), ht.2.2⟩ else
default :=
rfl
theorem subset_sInf_of_within [Inhabited s] {t : Set s}
(h' : t.Nonempty) (h'' : BddBelow t) (h : sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) ∈ s) :
sInf ((↑) '' t : Set α) = (@sInf s _ t : α) := by simp [dif_pos, h, h', h'']
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteLatticeIntervals.lean | 97 | 99 | theorem subset_sInf_emptyset [Inhabited s] :
sInf (∅ : Set s) = default := by | simp [sInf] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
/-!
# Projection of a line onto a closed interval
Given a linearly ordered type `α`, in this file we define
* `Set.projIci (a : α)` to be the map `α → [a, ∞)` sending `(-∞, a]` to `a`, and each point
`x ∈ [a, ∞)` to itself;
* `Set.projIic (b : α)` to be the map `α → (-∞, b[` sending `[b, ∞)` to `b`, and each point
`x ∈ (-∞, b]` to itself;
* `Set.projIcc (a b : α) (h : a ≤ b)` to be the map `α → [a, b]` sending `(-∞, a]` to `a`, `[b, ∞)`
to `b`, and each point `x ∈ [a, b]` to itself;
* `Set.IccExtend {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) (f : Icc a b → β)` to be the extension of `f` to `α` defined
as `f ∘ projIcc a b h`.
* `Set.IciExtend {a : α} (f : Ici a → β)` to be the extension of `f` to `α` defined
as `f ∘ projIci a`.
* `Set.IicExtend {b : α} (f : Iic b → β)` to be the extension of `f` to `α` defined
as `f ∘ projIic b`.
We also prove some trivial properties of these maps.
-/
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α]
open Function
namespace Set
/-- Projection of `α` to the closed interval `[a, ∞)`. -/
def projIci (a x : α) : Ici a := ⟨max a x, le_max_left _ _⟩
/-- Projection of `α` to the closed interval `(-∞, b]`. -/
def projIic (b x : α) : Iic b := ⟨min b x, min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Projection of `α` to the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
def projIcc (a b : α) (h : a ≤ b) (x : α) : Icc a b :=
⟨max a (min b x), le_max_left _ _, max_le h (min_le_left _ _)⟩
variable {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) {x : α}
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_projIci (a x : α) : (projIci a x : α) = max a x := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_projIic (b x : α) : (projIic b x : α) = min b x := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_projIcc (a b : α) (h : a ≤ b) (x : α) : (projIcc a b h x : α) = max a (min b x) := rfl
theorem projIci_of_le (hx : x ≤ a) : projIci a x = ⟨a, le_rfl⟩ := Subtype.ext <| max_eq_left hx
theorem projIic_of_le (hx : b ≤ x) : projIic b x = ⟨b, le_rfl⟩ := Subtype.ext <| min_eq_left hx
theorem projIcc_of_le_left (hx : x ≤ a) : projIcc a b h x = ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩ := by
simp [projIcc, hx, hx.trans h]
theorem projIcc_of_right_le (hx : b ≤ x) : projIcc a b h x = ⟨b, right_mem_Icc.2 h⟩ := by
simp [projIcc, hx, h]
@[simp]
theorem projIci_self (a : α) : projIci a a = ⟨a, le_rfl⟩ := projIci_of_le le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem projIic_self (b : α) : projIic b b = ⟨b, le_rfl⟩ := projIic_of_le le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem projIcc_left : projIcc a b h a = ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩ :=
projIcc_of_le_left h le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem projIcc_right : projIcc a b h b = ⟨b, right_mem_Icc.2 h⟩ :=
projIcc_of_right_le h le_rfl
theorem projIci_eq_self : projIci a x = ⟨a, le_rfl⟩ ↔ x ≤ a := by simp [projIci, Subtype.ext_iff]
theorem projIic_eq_self : projIic b x = ⟨b, le_rfl⟩ ↔ b ≤ x := by simp [projIic, Subtype.ext_iff]
theorem projIcc_eq_left (h : a < b) : projIcc a b h.le x = ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.mpr h.le⟩ ↔ x ≤ a := by
simp [projIcc, Subtype.ext_iff, h.not_le]
theorem projIcc_eq_right (h : a < b) : projIcc a b h.le x = ⟨b, right_mem_Icc.2 h.le⟩ ↔ b ≤ x := by
simp [projIcc, Subtype.ext_iff, max_min_distrib_left, h.le, h.not_le]
theorem projIci_of_mem (hx : x ∈ Ici a) : projIci a x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa [projIci]
theorem projIic_of_mem (hx : x ∈ Iic b) : projIic b x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa [projIic]
theorem projIcc_of_mem (hx : x ∈ Icc a b) : projIcc a b h x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
simp [projIcc, hx.1, hx.2]
@[simp]
theorem projIci_coe (x : Ici a) : projIci a x = x := by cases x; apply projIci_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem projIic_coe (x : Iic b) : projIic b x = x := by cases x; apply projIic_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem projIcc_val (x : Icc a b) : projIcc a b h x = x := by
cases x
apply projIcc_of_mem
theorem projIci_surjOn : SurjOn (projIci a) (Ici a) univ := fun x _ => ⟨x, x.2, projIci_coe x⟩
theorem projIic_surjOn : SurjOn (projIic b) (Iic b) univ := fun x _ => ⟨x, x.2, projIic_coe x⟩
theorem projIcc_surjOn : SurjOn (projIcc a b h) (Icc a b) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨x, x.2, projIcc_val h x⟩
theorem projIci_surjective : Surjective (projIci a) := fun x => ⟨x, projIci_coe x⟩
theorem projIic_surjective : Surjective (projIic b) := fun x => ⟨x, projIic_coe x⟩
theorem projIcc_surjective : Surjective (projIcc a b h) := fun x => ⟨x, projIcc_val h x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_projIci : range (projIci a) = univ := projIci_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_projIic : range (projIic a) = univ := projIic_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_projIcc : range (projIcc a b h) = univ :=
(projIcc_surjective h).range_eq
theorem monotone_projIci : Monotone (projIci a) := fun _ _ => max_le_max le_rfl
theorem monotone_projIic : Monotone (projIic a) := fun _ _ => min_le_min le_rfl
theorem monotone_projIcc : Monotone (projIcc a b h) := fun _ _ hxy =>
max_le_max le_rfl <| min_le_min le_rfl hxy
theorem strictMonoOn_projIci : StrictMonoOn (projIci a) (Ici a) := fun x hx y hy hxy => by
simpa only [projIci_of_mem, hx, hy]
theorem strictMonoOn_projIic : StrictMonoOn (projIic b) (Iic b) := fun x hx y hy hxy => by
simpa only [projIic_of_mem, hx, hy]
theorem strictMonoOn_projIcc : StrictMonoOn (projIcc a b h) (Icc a b) := fun x hx y hy hxy => by
simpa only [projIcc_of_mem, hx, hy]
/-- Extend a function `[a, ∞) → β` to a map `α → β`. -/
def IciExtend (f : Ici a → β) : α → β :=
f ∘ projIci a
/-- Extend a function `(-∞, b] → β` to a map `α → β`. -/
def IicExtend (f : Iic b → β) : α → β :=
f ∘ projIic b
/-- Extend a function `[a, b] → β` to a map `α → β`. -/
def IccExtend {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) (f : Icc a b → β) : α → β :=
f ∘ projIcc a b h
theorem IciExtend_apply (f : Ici a → β) (x : α) : IciExtend f x = f ⟨max a x, le_max_left _ _⟩ :=
rfl
theorem IicExtend_apply (f : Iic b → β) (x : α) : IicExtend f x = f ⟨min b x, min_le_left _ _⟩ :=
rfl
theorem IccExtend_apply (h : a ≤ b) (f : Icc a b → β) (x : α) :
IccExtend h f x = f ⟨max a (min b x), le_max_left _ _, max_le h (min_le_left _ _)⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_IciExtend (f : Ici a → β) : range (IciExtend f) = range f := by
simp only [IciExtend, range_comp f, range_projIci, range_id', image_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_IicExtend (f : Iic b → β) : range (IicExtend f) = range f := by
simp only [IicExtend, range_comp f, range_projIic, range_id', image_univ]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/ProjIcc.lean | 179 | 180 | theorem IccExtend_range (f : Icc a b → β) : range (IccExtend h f) = range f := by | simp only [IccExtend, range_comp f, range_projIcc, image_univ] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
/-!
# Bernstein polynomials
The definition of the Bernstein polynomials
```
bernsteinPolynomial (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)
```
and the fact that for `ν : Fin (n+1)` these are linearly independent over `ℚ`.
We prove the basic identities
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = 1`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ ν • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = n • X`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ (ν * (ν-1)) • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = (n * (n-1)) • X^2`
## Notes
See also `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Bernstein`, which defines the Bernstein approximations
of a continuous function `f : C([0,1], ℝ)`, and shows that these converge uniformly to `f`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat (choose)
open Polynomial (X)
open scoped Polynomial
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-- `bernsteinPolynomial R n ν` is `(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)`.
Although the coefficients are integers, it is convenient to work over an arbitrary commutative ring.
-/
def bernsteinPolynomial (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν)
example : bernsteinPolynomial ℤ 3 2 = 3 * X ^ 2 - 3 * X ^ 3 := by
norm_num [bernsteinPolynomial, choose]
ring
namespace bernsteinPolynomial
theorem eq_zero_of_lt {n ν : ℕ} (h : n < ν) : bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map (f : R →+* S) (n ν : ℕ) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).map f = bernsteinPolynomial S n ν := by simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
end
theorem flip (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).comp (1 - X) = bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν) := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, h, tsub_tsub_assoc, mul_right_comm]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Bernstein.lean | 76 | 78 | theorem flip' (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = (bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν)).comp (1 - X) := by | simp [← flip _ _ _ h, Polynomial.comp_assoc] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem isLindelof_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Countable ι] (h : ∀ i, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i, f i) := (countable_range f).isLindelof_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof (hs : s.Countable) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof (hs : s.Finite) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem IsLindelof.countable_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsLindelof s) :
s.Countable := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, ht, _, hssubt⟩
rw [biUnion_of_singleton] at hssubt
exact ht.mono hssubt
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology X] : IsLindelof s ↔ s.Countable :=
⟨fun h => h.countable_of_discrete, fun h => h.isLindelof⟩
theorem IsLindelof.union (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsLindelof t) : IsLindelof (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isLindelof_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsLindelof.insert (hs : IsLindelof s) (a) : IsLindelof (insert a s) :=
isLindelof_singleton.union hs
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isLindelof_open_iff_eq_countable_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsLindelof (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsLindelof U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Countable ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨Y, f, rfl, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion h₂
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
h₁.elim_countable_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) Subset.rfl
refine ⟨t.image f', Countable.image (ht.1) f', le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht.2 ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
rw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := (mem_image ..).mp hi
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
/-- `Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets. -/
def Filter.coLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
--`Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coLindelof : (coLindelof X).HasBasis IsLindelof compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isLindelof_empty⟩
theorem mem_coLindelof : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_iff
theorem mem_coLindelof' : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_coLindelof.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof (hs : IsLindelof s) : sᶜ ∈ coLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_of_mem hs
theorem coLindelof_le_cofinite : coLindelof X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof
theorem Tendsto.isLindelof_insert_range_of_coLindelof {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (coLindelof X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne _ hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff_nonempty, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_coLindelof.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
/-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets. -/
def Filter.coclosedLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsClosed s) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coclosedLindelof :
(Filter.coclosedLindelof X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsLindelof s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedLindelof, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isLindelof_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
theorem mem_coclosedLindelof : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_iff, and_assoc]
theorem mem_coclosed_Lindelof' : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t := by
simp only [mem_coclosedLindelof, compl_subset_comm]
theorem coLindelof_le_coclosedLindelof : coLindelof X ≤ coclosedLindelof X :=
iInf_mono fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
theorem IsLindeof.compl_mem_coclosedLindelof_of_isClosed (hs : IsLindelof s) (hs' : IsClosed s) :
sᶜ ∈ Filter.coclosedLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_of_mem ⟨hs', hs⟩
/-- X is a Lindelöf space iff every open cover has a countable subcover. -/
class LindelofSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a Lindelöf space, `Set.univ` is a Lindelöf set. -/
isLindelof_univ : IsLindelof (univ : Set X)
instance (priority := 10) Subsingleton.lindelofSpace [Subsingleton X] : LindelofSpace X :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.isLindelof⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ_iff : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) ↔ LindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ [h : LindelofSpace X] : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) :=
h.isLindelof_univ
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 491 | 493 | theorem cluster_point_of_Lindelof [LindelofSpace X] (f : Filter X) [NeBot f]
[CountableInterFilter f] : ∃ x, ClusterPt x f := by | simpa using isLindelof_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ by simp) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
lemma nontrivial_iff {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (ZMod n) ↔ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, subsingleton_iff]
-- todo: this can be made a `Unique` instance.
instance subsingleton_units : Subsingleton (ZMod 2)ˣ :=
⟨by decide⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 904 | 905 | theorem add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} :
a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Indicator function
- `Set.indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `0` otherwise.
- `Set.mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `1` otherwise.
## Implementation note
In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function is a function
used to indicate membership of an element in a set `s`,
having the value `1` for all elements of `s` and the value `0` otherwise.
But since it is usually used to restrict a function to a certain set `s`,
we let the indicator function take the value `f x` for some function `f`, instead of `1`.
If the usual indicator function is needed, just set `f` to be the constant function `fun _ ↦ 1`.
The indicator function is implemented non-computably, to avoid having to pass around `Decidable`
arguments. This is in contrast with the design of `Pi.single` or `Set.piecewise`.
## Tags
indicator, characteristic
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
/-- `Set.mulIndicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `1` otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun _ => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
/-- If a multiplicative indicator function is not equal to `1` at a point, then that point is in the
set. -/
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`"]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) f s := fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_mem hx f
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator` for the version with `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator` for the version with `s`."]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator' : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) 1 sᶜ :=
fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hx f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ s := fun _ hx =>
hx.imp_symm fun h => mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_mulSupport : mulIndicator (mulSupport f) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 Subset.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) (g : α → M) :
mulIndicator (range f) g ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ range f)
piecewise_range_comp _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_congr (h : EqOn f g s) : mulIndicator s f = mulIndicator s g :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with h_1
· exact h h_1
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator {t : Set β} {g : β → M} {b : β}
(h1 : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) (h2 : f a = g b) :
s.mulIndicator f a = t.mulIndicator g b := by
by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp_all
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_eq_mulIndicator_const {t : Set β} {b : β} {c : M} (h : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) :
s.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) a = t.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) b :=
mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator h rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_univ (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (univ : Set α) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 <| subset_univ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_empty (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = fun _ => 1 :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| disjoint_empty _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_empty' (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = 1 :=
mulIndicator_empty f
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one (s : Set α) : (mulIndicator s fun _ => (1 : M)) = fun _ => (1 : M) :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| by simp only [mulSupport_one, empty_disjoint]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one' {s : Set α} : s.mulIndicator (1 : α → M) = 1 :=
mulIndicator_one M s
variable {M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (mulIndicator t f) = mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp_all +contextual
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∩ mulSupport f) f = mulIndicator s f := by
rw [← mulIndicator_mulIndicator, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator (h : M → β) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {x : α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
h (s.mulIndicator f x) = s.piecewise (h ∘ f) (const α (h 1)) x := by
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
convert s.apply_piecewise f (const α 1) (fun _ => h) (x := x) using 2
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 209 | 210 | theorem mulIndicator_comp_right {s : Set α} (f : β → α) {g : α → M} {x : β} :
mulIndicator (f ⁻¹' s) (g ∘ f) x = mulIndicator s g (f x) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
/-!
# Probability density function
This file defines the probability density function of random variables, by which we mean
measurable functions taking values in a Borel space. The probability density function is defined
as the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the law of `X`. In particular, a measurable function `f`
is said to the probability density function of a random variable `X` if for all measurable
sets `S`, `ℙ(X ∈ S) = ∫ x in S, f x dx`. Probability density functions are one way of describing
the distribution of a random variable, and are useful for calculating probabilities and
finding moments (although the latter is better achieved with moment generating functions).
This file also defines the continuous uniform distribution and proves some properties about
random variables with this distribution.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.HasPDF` : A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to `HasPDF` with
respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E` if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X`
is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ` and they `HaveLebesgueDecomposition`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf` : If `X` is a random variable that `HasPDF X ℙ μ`, then `pdf X`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform` : A random variable `X` is said to follow the uniform
distribution if it has a constant probability density function with a compact, non-null support.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_pdf_smul` : Law of the unconscious statistician,
i.e. if a random variable `X : Ω → E` has pdf `f`, then `𝔼(g(X)) = ∫ x, f x • g x dx` for
all measurable `g : E → F`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_mul_eq_integral` : A real-valued random variable `X` with
pdf `f` has expectation `∫ x, x * f x dx`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.integral_eq` : If `X` follows the uniform distribution with
its pdf having support `s`, then `X` has expectation `(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x dx` where `λ`
is the Lebesgue measure.
## TODO
Ultimately, we would also like to define characteristic functions to describe distributions as
it exists for all random variables. However, to define this, we will need Fourier transforms
which we currently do not have.
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E]
/-- A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to have a probability density function (`HasPDF`)
with respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E`
if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`
and they have a Lebesgue decomposition (`HaveLebesgueDecomposition`). -/
class HasPDF {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
Prop where
protected aemeasurable' : AEMeasurable X ℙ
protected haveLebesgueDecomposition' : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
protected absolutelyContinuous' : map X ℙ ≪ μ
section HasPDF
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X Y : Ω → E} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
theorem hasPDF_iff :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ AEMeasurable X ℙ ∧ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩⟩
theorem hasPDF_iff_of_aemeasurable (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hasPDF_iff]
simp only [hX, true_and]
variable (X ℙ μ) in
@[measurability]
theorem HasPDF.aemeasurable [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : AEMeasurable X ℙ := HasPDF.aemeasurable' μ
instance HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ :=
HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition'
theorem HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : map X ℙ ≪ μ := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous'
/-- A random variable that `HasPDF` is quasi-measure preserving. -/
theorem HasPDF.quasiMeasurePreserving_of_measurable (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E)
[HasPDF X ℙ μ] (h : Measurable X) : QuasiMeasurePreserving X ℙ μ :=
{ measurable := h
absolutelyContinuous := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous .. }
theorem HasPDF.congr (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] : HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨(HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ).congr hXY, ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.haveLebesgueDecomposition,
ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.absolutelyContinuous⟩
theorem HasPDF.congr_iff (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) : HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY, fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias HasPDF.congr' := HasPDF.congr_iff
/-- X `HasPDF` if there is a pdf `f` such that `map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f`. -/
theorem hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) (f : E → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨hX, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [h]
· rw [withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
exact haveLebesgueDecomposition_withDensity μ hf.measurable_mk
· exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f
end HasPDF
/-- If `X` is a random variable, then `pdf X ℙ μ`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`. -/
def pdf {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
E → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ
theorem pdf_def {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
pdf X ℙ μ = (map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ := rfl
theorem pdf_of_not_aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
{X : Ω → E} (hX : ¬AEMeasurable X ℙ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [pdf_def, map_of_not_aemeasurable hX]
exact rnDeriv_zero μ
theorem pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
{μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} (h : ¬(map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ) : pdf X ℙ μ = 0 :=
rnDeriv_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition h
theorem aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
(X : Ω → E) (h : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
contrapose! h
exact pdf_of_not_aemeasurable h
theorem hasPDF_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E}
(hac : map X ℙ ≪ μ) (hpdf : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, hac⟩
· exact aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero X hpdf
· contrapose! hpdf
have := pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition hpdf
filter_upwards using congrFun this
@[measurability]
| Mathlib/Probability/Density.lean | 152 | 155 | theorem measurable_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by | volume_tac) : Measurable (pdf X ℙ μ) := by
exact measurable_rnDeriv _ _ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
/-!
# Scalar-multiple polynomial evaluation
This file defines polynomial evaluation via scalar multiplication. Our polynomials have
coefficients in a semiring `R`, and we evaluate at a weak form of `R`-algebra, namely an additive
commutative monoid with an action of `R` and a notion of natural number power. This
is a generalization of `Algebra.Polynomial.Eval`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.smeval`: function for evaluating a polynomial with coefficients in a `Semiring`
`R` at an element `x` of an `AddCommMonoid` `S` that has natural number powers and an `R`-action.
* `smeval.linearMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-linear map, when `S` is an `R`-module.
* `smeval.algebraMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-algebra map, when `S` is an `R`-algebra.
## Main results
* `smeval_monomial`: monomials evaluate as we expect.
* `smeval_add`, `smeval_smul`: linearity of evaluation, given an `R`-module.
* `smeval_mul`, `smeval_comp`: multiplicativity of evaluation, given power-associativity.
* `eval₂_smulOneHom_eq_smeval`, `leval_eq_smeval.linearMap`,
`aeval_eq_smeval`, etc.: comparisons
## TODO
* `smeval_neg` and `smeval_intCast` for `R` a ring and `S` an `AddCommGroup`.
* Nonunital evaluation for polynomials with vanishing constant term for `Pow S ℕ+` (different file?)
-/
namespace Polynomial
section MulActionWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (p : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ]
[MulActionWithZero R S] (x : S)
/-- Scalar multiplication together with taking a natural number power. -/
def smul_pow : ℕ → R → S := fun n r => r • x^n
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` in the scalar semiring `R` at an element `x` in the target `S` using
scalar multiple `R`-action. -/
irreducible_def smeval : S := p.sum (smul_pow x)
theorem smeval_eq_sum : p.smeval x = p.sum (smul_pow x) := by rw [smeval_def]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_C : (C r).smeval x = r • x ^ 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_C_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_monomial (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n r).smeval x = r • x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index]
theorem eval_eq_smeval : p.eval r = p.smeval r := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, smeval_eq_sum]
rfl
theorem eval₂_smulOneHom_eq_smeval (R : Type*) [Semiring R] {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (p : R[X]) (x : S) :
p.eval₂ RingHom.smulOneHom x = p.smeval x := by
rw [smeval_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum]
congr 1 with e a
simp only [RingHom.smulOneHom_apply, smul_one_mul, smul_pow]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem smeval_zero : (0 : R[X]).smeval x = 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, sum_zero_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_one : (1 : R[X]).smeval x = 1 • x ^ 0 := by
rw [← C_1, smeval_C]
simp only [Nat.cast_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_X :
(X : R[X]).smeval x = x ^ 1 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_X_index, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_X_pow {n : ℕ} :
(X ^ n : R[X]).smeval x = x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, X_pow_eq_monomial, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index, one_smul]
end MulActionWithZero
section Module
variable (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (p q : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ] [Module R S]
(x : S)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Smeval.lean | 105 | 109 | theorem smeval_add : (p + q).smeval x = p.smeval x + q.smeval x := by | simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow]
refine sum_add_index p q (smul_pow x) (fun _ ↦ ?_) (fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_)
· rw [smul_pow, zero_smul]
· rw [smul_pow, smul_pow, smul_pow, add_smul] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
/-!
# Differentiation of measures
On a second countable metric space with a measure `μ`, consider a Vitali family (i.e., for each `x`
one has a family of sets shrinking to `x`, with a good behavior with respect to covering theorems).
Consider also another measure `ρ`. Then, for almost every `x`, the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges when
`a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with
respect to `μ`. This is the main theorem on differentiation of measures.
This theorem is proved in this file, under the name `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`. Note that,
almost surely, `μ a` is eventually positive and finite (see
`VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos` and `VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top`), so the
ratio really makes sense.
For concrete applications, one needs concrete instances of Vitali families, as provided for instance
by `Besicovitch.vitaliFamily` (for balls) or by `Vitali.vitaliFamily` (for doubling measures).
Specific applications to Lebesgue density points and the Lebesgue differentiation theorem are also
derived:
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that, for almost every point `x ∈ s`,
then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` tends to `1` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_average_norm_sub` states that, for almost every point `x`, then the
average of `y ↦ ‖f y - f x‖` on `a` tends to `0` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
## Sketch of proof
Let `v` be a Vitali family for `μ`. Assume for simplicity that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with
respect to `μ`, as the case of a singular measure is easier.
It is easy to see that a set `s` on which `liminf ρ a / μ a < q` satisfies `ρ s ≤ q * μ s`, by using
a disjoint subcovering provided by the definition of Vitali families. Similarly for the limsup.
It follows that a set on which `ρ a / μ a` oscillates has measure `0`, and therefore that
`ρ a / μ a` converges almost surely (`VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_div`). Moreover, on a set where the
limit is close to a constant `c`, one gets `ρ s ∼ c μ s`, using again a covering lemma as above.
It follows that `ρ` is equal to `μ.withDensity (v.limRatio ρ x)`, where `v.limRatio ρ x` is the
limit of `ρ a / μ a` at `x` (which is well defined almost everywhere). By uniqueness of the
Radon-Nikodym derivative, one gets `v.limRatio ρ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x` almost everywhere, completing
the proof.
There is a difficulty in this sketch: this argument works well when `v.limRatio ρ` is measurable,
but there is no guarantee that this is the case, especially if one doesn't make further assumptions
on the Vitali family. We use an indirect argument to show that `v.limRatio ρ` is always
almost everywhere measurable, again based on the disjoint subcovering argument
(see `VitaliFamily.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio`), and then proceed as sketched above
but replacing `v.limRatio ρ` by a measurable version called `v.limRatioMeas ρ`.
## Counterexample
The standing assumption in this file is that spaces are second countable. Without this assumption,
measures may be zero locally but nonzero globally, which is not compatible with differentiation
theory (which deduces global information from local one). Here is an example displaying this
behavior.
Define a measure `μ` by `μ s = 0` if `s` is covered by countably many balls of radius `1`,
and `μ s = ∞` otherwise. This is indeed a countably additive measure, which is moreover
locally finite and doubling at small scales. It vanishes on every ball of radius `1`, so all the
quantities in differentiation theory (defined as ratios of measures as the radius tends to zero)
make no sense. However, the measure is not globally zero if the space is big enough.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.9][Federer1996]
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
/-- The limit along a Vitali family of `ρ a / μ a` where it makes sense, and garbage otherwise.
Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary device to show that this ratio tends almost
everywhere to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
/-- For almost every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have positive
measure. (This is a nontrivial result, following from the covering property of Vitali families). -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp -zeta only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
/-- For every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have finite measure.
(This is a trivial result, following from the fact that the measure is locally finite). -/
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
/-- If two measures `ρ` and `ν` have, at every point of a set `s`, arbitrarily small sets in a
Vitali family satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`, then `ρ s ≤ ν s` if `ρ ≪ μ`. -/
theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
theorem eventually_filterAt_integrableOn (x : α) {f : α → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, IntegrableOn f a μ := by
rcases hf x with ⟨w, w_nhds, hw⟩
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds w_nhds] with a ha
exact hw.mono_set ha
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {ρ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ρ]
/-- If a measure `ρ` is singular with respect to `μ`, then for `μ` almost every `x`, the ratio
`ρ a / μ a` tends to zero when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family. This makes sense
as `μ a` is eventually positive by `ae_eventually_measure_pos`. -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (hρ : ρ ⟂ₘ μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
have A : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a := by
intro ε εpos
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a} with hs
change μ s = 0
obtain ⟨o, _, ρo, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, MeasurableSet o ∧ ρ o = 0 ∧ μ oᶜ = 0 := hρ
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ o ∪ oᶜ) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inter_union_compl s o]
gcongr
apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ o) + μ oᶜ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (s ∩ o) := by rw [μo, add_zero]
_ = (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * (ε • μ) (s ∩ o) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne' ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ (s ∩ o) := by
gcongr
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ smul_absolutelyContinuous _ ?_
intro x hx
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [mem_inter_iff, not_lt, not_eventually, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
exact hx.1
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ o := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = 0 := by rw [ρo, mul_zero]
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ≥0, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < u n * μ a :=
ae_all_iff.2 fun n => A (u n) (u_pos n)
filter_upwards [B, v.ae_eventually_measure_pos]
intro x hx h'x
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun z hz => (ENNReal.not_lt_zero hz).elim, fun z hz => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨w, w_pos, w_lt⟩ : ∃ w : ℝ≥0, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < w ∧ (w : ℝ≥0∞) < z :=
ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hz
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < w := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 w (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 w_pos)).exists
filter_upwards [hx n, h'x, v.eventually_measure_lt_top x]
intro a ha μa_pos μa_lt_top
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl μa_pos.ne') (Or.inl μa_lt_top.ne)]
exact ha.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' ((ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 hn.le).trans w_lt.le) _)
section AbsolutelyContinuous
variable (hρ : ρ ≪ μ)
include hρ
/-- A set of points `s` satisfying both `ρ a ≤ c * μ a` and `ρ a ≥ d * μ a` at arbitrarily small
sets in a Vitali family has measure `0` if `c < d`. Indeed, the first inequality should imply
that `ρ s ≤ c * μ s`, and the second one that `ρ s ≥ d * μ s`, a contradiction if `0 < μ s`. -/
theorem null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge {c d : ℝ≥0} (hcd : c < d) (s : Set α)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ c * μ a)
(hd : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, (d : ℝ≥0∞) * μ a ≤ ρ a) : μ s = 0 := by
apply measure_null_of_locally_null s fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ μ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top μ x
refine ⟨s ∩ o, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), ?_⟩
let s' := s ∩ o
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ s')
calc
ρ s' ≤ c * μ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (c • μ) hρ s' fun x hx => hc x hx.1
_ < d * μ s' := by
apply (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_right h _).2 (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hcd)
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right) μo).ne
_ ≤ ρ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ smul_absolutelyContinuous s' fun x hx ↦ hd x hx.1
/-- If `ρ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`, then for almost every `x`,
the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family for `μ`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_div : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ c, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 c) := by
obtain ⟨w, w_count, w_dense, _, w_top⟩ :
∃ w : Set ℝ≥0∞, w.Countable ∧ Dense w ∧ 0 ∉ w ∧ ∞ ∉ w :=
ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
have I : ∀ x ∈ w, x ≠ ∞ := fun x xs hx => w_top (hx ▸ xs)
have A : ∀ c ∈ w, ∀ d ∈ w, c < d → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ,
¬((∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a / μ a < c) ∧ ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, d < ρ a / μ a) := by
intro c hc d hd hcd
lift c to ℝ≥0 using I c hc
lift d to ℝ≥0 using I d hd
apply v.null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge hρ (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 hcd)
· simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt, not_le, not_eventually,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
intro x h1x _
apply h1x.mono fun a ha => ?_
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
· simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt, not_le, not_eventually,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
intro x _ h2x
apply h2x.mono fun a ha => ?_
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ c ∈ w, ∀ d ∈ w, c < d →
¬((∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a / μ a < c) ∧ ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, d < ρ a / μ a) := by
#adaptation_note /-- 2024-04-23
The next two lines were previously just `simpa only [ae_ball_iff w_count, ae_all_iff]` -/
rw [ae_ball_iff w_count]; intro x hx; rw [ae_ball_iff w_count]; revert x
simpa only [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [B]
intro x hx
exact tendsto_of_no_upcrossings w_dense hx
theorem ae_tendsto_limRatio :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) := by
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_div hρ]
intro x hx
exact tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx
/-- Given two thresholds `p < q`, the sets `{x | v.limRatio ρ x < p}`
and `{x | q < v.limRatio ρ x}` are obviously disjoint. The key to proving that `v.limRatio ρ` is
almost everywhere measurable is to show that these sets have measurable supersets which are also
disjoint, up to zero measure. This is the content of this lemma. -/
theorem exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio {p q : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p < q) :
∃ a b, MeasurableSet a ∧ MeasurableSet b ∧
{x | v.limRatio ρ x < p} ⊆ a ∧ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatio ρ x} ⊆ b ∧ μ (a ∩ b) = 0 := by
/- Here is a rough sketch, assuming that the measure is finite and the limit is well defined
everywhere. Let `u := {x | v.limRatio ρ x < p}` and `w := {x | q < v.limRatio ρ x}`. They
have measurable supersets `u'` and `w'` of the same measure. We will show that these satisfy
the conclusion of the theorem, i.e., `μ (u' ∩ w') = 0`. For this, note that
`ρ (u' ∩ w') = ρ (u ∩ w')` (as `w'` is measurable, see `measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left`).
The latter set is included in the set where the limit of the ratios is `< p`, and therefore
its measure is `≤ p * μ (u ∩ w')`. Using the same trick in the other direction gives that this
is `p * μ (u' ∩ w')`. We have shown that `ρ (u' ∩ w') ≤ p * μ (u' ∩ w')`. Arguing in the same
way but using the `w` part gives `q * μ (u' ∩ w') ≤ ρ (u' ∩ w')`. If `μ (u' ∩ w')` were nonzero,
this would be a contradiction as `p < q`.
For the rigorous proof, we need to work on a part of the space where the measure is finite
(provided by `spanningSets (ρ + μ)`) and to restrict to the set where the limit is well defined
(called `s` below, of full measure). Otherwise, the argument goes through.
-/
let s := {x | ∃ c, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 c)}
let o : ℕ → Set α := spanningSets (ρ + μ)
let u n := s ∩ {x | v.limRatio ρ x < p} ∩ o n
let w n := s ∩ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatio ρ x} ∩ o n
-- the supersets are obtained by restricting to the set `s` where the limit is well defined, to
-- a finite measure part `o n`, taking a measurable superset here, and then taking the union over
-- `n`.
refine
⟨toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u n),
toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n), ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- check that these sets are measurable supersets as required
· exact
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).union
(MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).union
(MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· intro x hx
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· refine Or.inr (mem_iUnion.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex (ρ + μ) x, ?_⟩)
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ⟨⟨h, hx⟩, mem_spanningSetsIndex _ _⟩
· exact Or.inl (subset_toMeasurable μ sᶜ h)
· intro x hx
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· refine Or.inr (mem_iUnion.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex (ρ + μ) x, ?_⟩)
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ⟨⟨h, hx⟩, mem_spanningSetsIndex _ _⟩
· exact Or.inl (subset_toMeasurable μ sᶜ h)
-- it remains to check the nontrivial part that these sets have zero measure intersection.
-- it suffices to do it for fixed `m` and `n`, as one is taking countable unions.
suffices H : ∀ m n : ℕ, μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) = 0 by
have A :
(toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u n)) ∩
(toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ⊆
toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪
⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n) := by
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, true_and,
subset_union_left, union_subset_iff, inter_self]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact inter_subset_right.trans subset_union_left
· exact inter_subset_left.trans subset_union_left
· simp_rw [iUnion_inter, inter_iUnion]; exact subset_union_right
refine le_antisymm ((measure_mono A).trans ?_) bot_le
calc
μ (toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪
⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
μ (toMeasurable μ sᶜ) +
μ (⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
have : μ sᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_div hρ; rw [measure_toMeasurable, this, zero_add]
_ ≤ ∑' (m) (n), μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
((measure_iUnion_le _).trans (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun m => measure_iUnion_le _))
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
-- now starts the nontrivial part of the argument. We fix `m` and `n`, and show that the
-- measurable supersets of `u m` and `w n` have zero measure intersection by using the lemmas
-- `measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left` (to reduce to `u m` or `w n` instead of the measurable
-- superset) and `measure_le_of_frequently_le` to compare their measures for `ρ` and `μ`.
intro m n
have I : (ρ + μ) (u m) ≠ ∞ := by
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) m)).ne
exact inter_subset_right
have J : (ρ + μ) (w n) ≠ ∞ := by
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) n)).ne
exact inter_subset_right
have A :
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
calc
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) =
ρ (u m ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) I
_ ≤ (p • μ) (u m ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (p • μ) hρ _ fun x hx => ?_
have L : Tendsto (fun a : Set α => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) :=
tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx.1.1.1
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, ρ b / μ b < p := (tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ hx.1.1.2
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
_ = p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply,
measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) I]
have B :
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
calc
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) =
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ w n) := by
conv_rhs => rw [inter_comm]
rw [inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) J]
_ ≤ ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ w n) := by
rw [← coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le _ (.smul_left .rfl _) _ ?_
intro x hx
have L : Tendsto (fun a : Set α => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) :=
tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx.2.1.1
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, (q : ℝ≥0∞) < ρ b / μ b :=
(tendsto_order.1 L).1 _ hx.2.1.2
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
_ = ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
conv_rhs => rw [inter_comm]
rw [inter_comm]
exact (measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) J).symm
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)))
calc
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
A
_ < q * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
gcongr
suffices H : (ρ + μ) (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≠ ∞ by
simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at H
exact H.2
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_left) _).ne
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) m)
exact inter_subset_right
_ ≤ ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := B
theorem aemeasurable_limRatio : AEMeasurable (v.limRatio ρ) μ := by
apply ENNReal.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets _ _ fun p q hpq => ?_
exact v.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio hρ hpq
/-- A measurable version of `v.limRatio ρ`. Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary
device to show that `v.limRatio` is almost everywhere equal to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatioMeas : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(v.aemeasurable_limRatio hρ).mk _
theorem limRatioMeas_measurable : Measurable (v.limRatioMeas hρ) :=
AEMeasurable.measurable_mk _
theorem ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x)) := by
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_limRatio hρ, AEMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (v.aemeasurable_limRatio hρ)]
intro x hx h'x
rwa [h'x] at hx
/-- If, for all `x` in a set `s`, one has frequently `ρ a / μ a < p`, then `ρ s ≤ p * μ s`, as
proved in `measure_le_of_frequently_le`. Since `ρ a / μ a` tends almost everywhere to
`v.limRatioMeas hρ x`, the same property holds for sets `s` on which `v.limRatioMeas hρ < p`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 434 | 438 | theorem measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt {p : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α}
(h : s ⊆ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x < p}) : ρ s ≤ p * μ s := by | let t := {x : α | Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x))}
have A : μ tᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ
suffices H : ρ (s ∩ t) ≤ (p • μ) (s ∩ t) by calc |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Fin
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Finset Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
/-!
### Locally finite order etc instances
-/
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder (n : ℕ) : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) where
finsetIcc a b := attachFin (Icc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIco a b := attachFin (Ico a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finsetIoc a b := attachFin (Ioc a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2
finsetIoo a b := attachFin (Ioo a b) fun x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2
finset_mem_Icc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ico a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioc a b := by simp
finset_mem_Ioo a b := by simp
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderBot
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n}
variable {m : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Icc :
attachFin (Icc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Icc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico :
attachFin (Ico a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ico a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioc :
attachFin (Ioc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioc.mp hx).2.trans_lt b.2) = Ioc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo :
attachFin (Ioo a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2.trans b.2) = Ioo a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_uIcc :
attachFin (uIcc a b) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Icc.mp hx).2.trans_lt (max a b).2) = uIcc a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ico_eq_Ici : attachFin (Ico a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ico.mp hx).2) = Ici a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem attachFin_Ioo_eq_Ioi : attachFin (Ioo a n) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Ioo.mp hx).2) = Ioi a := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 84 | 85 | theorem attachFin_Iic : attachFin (Iic a) (fun _x hx ↦ (mem_Iic.mp hx).trans_lt a.2) = Iic a := by | ext; simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
/-!
# Cast of factorials
This file allows calculating factorials (including ascending and descending ones) as elements of a
semiring.
This is particularly crucial for `Nat.descFactorial` as subtraction on `ℕ` does **not** correspond
to subtraction on a general semiring. For example, we can't rely on existing cast lemmas to prove
`↑(a.descFactorial 2) = ↑a * (↑a - 1)`. We must use the fact that, whenever `↑(a - 1)` is not equal
to `↑a - 1`, the other factor is `0` anyway.
-/
open Nat
variable (S : Type*)
namespace Nat
section Semiring
variable [Semiring S] (a b : ℕ)
theorem cast_ascFactorial : a.ascFactorial b = (ascPochhammer S b).eval (a : S) := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, ascPochhammer_eval_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Cast.lean | 34 | 35 | theorem cast_descFactorial :
a.descFactorial b = (ascPochhammer S b).eval (a - (b - 1) : S) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_nat_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
exact ⟨i, hi⟩
instance (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel (SameCycle f)] :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f⁻¹) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (f.SameCycle x y) (sameCycle_inv).symm
instance (priority := 100) [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (SameCycle (1 : Perm α)) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (x = y) sameCycle_one.symm
end SameCycle
/-!
### `IsCycle`
-/
section IsCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- A cycle is a non identity permutation where any two nonfixed points of the permutation are
related by repeated application of the permutation. -/
def IsCycle (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, f y ≠ y → SameCycle f x y
theorem IsCycle.ne_one (h : IsCycle f) : f ≠ 1 := fun hf => by simp [hf, IsCycle] at h
@[simp]
theorem not_isCycle_one : ¬(1 : Perm α).IsCycle := fun H => H.ne_one rfl
protected theorem IsCycle.sameCycle (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
SameCycle f x y :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hg.2 hx
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := hg.2 hy
⟨b - a, by rw [← ha, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel, hb]⟩
theorem IsCycle.exists_zpow_eq : IsCycle f → f x ≠ x → f y ≠ y → ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y :=
IsCycle.sameCycle
theorem IsCycle.inv (hf : IsCycle f) : IsCycle f⁻¹ :=
hf.imp fun _ ⟨hx, h⟩ =>
⟨inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hx.symm, fun _ hy => (h <| inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hy.symm).inv⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_inv : IsCycle f⁻¹ ↔ IsCycle f :=
⟨fun h => h.inv, IsCycle.inv⟩
theorem IsCycle.conj : IsCycle f → IsCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx, h⟩
refine ⟨g x, by simp [coe_mul, inv_apply_self, hx], fun y hy => ?_⟩
rw [← apply_inv_self g y]
exact (h <| eq_inv_iff_eq.not.2 hy).conj
protected theorem IsCycle.extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) :
IsCycle g → IsCycle (g.extendDomain f) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩
refine ⟨f a, ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· rw [extendDomain_apply_image]
exact Subtype.coe_injective.ne (f.injective.ne ha)
have h : b = f (f.symm ⟨b, of_not_not <| hb ∘ extendDomain_apply_not_subtype _ _⟩) := by
rw [apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [h] at hb ⊢
simp only [extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_injective.ne_iff, f.injective.ne_iff] at hb
exact (ha' hb).extendDomain
theorem isCycle_iff_sameCycle (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle f ↔ ∀ {y}, SameCycle f x y ↔ f y ≠ y :=
⟨fun hf y =>
⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ hy =>
hx <| by
rw [← zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy i, (f ^ i).injective.eq_iff] at hi
rw [hi, hy],
hf.exists_zpow_eq hx⟩,
fun h => ⟨x, hx, fun _ hy => h.2 hy⟩⟩
section Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem IsCycle.exists_pow_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx hy
classical exact
⟨(n % orderOf f).toNat, by
{have := n.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt (orderOf_pos f)))
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this, zpow_mod_orderOf]}⟩
end Finite
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem isCycle_swap (hxy : x ≠ y) : IsCycle (swap x y) :=
⟨y, by rwa [swap_apply_right], fun a (ha : ite (a = x) y (ite (a = y) x a) ≠ a) =>
if hya : y = a then ⟨0, hya⟩
else
⟨1, by
rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs at * <;> tauto⟩⟩
protected theorem IsSwap.isCycle : IsSwap f → IsCycle f := by
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩
exact isCycle_swap hxy
variable [Fintype α]
theorem IsCycle.two_le_card_support (h : IsCycle f) : 2 ≤ #f.support :=
two_le_card_support_of_ne_one h.ne_one
/-- The subgroup generated by a cycle is in bijection with its support -/
noncomputable def IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) :
(Subgroup.zpowers σ) ≃ σ.support :=
Equiv.ofBijective
(fun (τ : ↥ ((Subgroup.zpowers σ) : Set (Perm α))) =>
⟨(τ : Perm α) (Classical.choose hσ), by
obtain ⟨τ, n, rfl⟩ := τ
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
exact (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1⟩)
(by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, m, rfl⟩ ⟨b, n, rfl⟩ h
ext y
by_cases hy : σ y = y
· simp_rw [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy]
· obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_comm σ m i, zpow_apply_comm σ n i]
exact congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h)
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [mem_support] at hy
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
exact ⟨⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) {n : ℕ} :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport ⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ =
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_symm_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) (n : ℕ) :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport.symm
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ =
⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ :=
(Equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 hσ.zpowersEquivSupport_apply
protected theorem IsCycle.orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) : orderOf f = #f.support := by
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers, ← Fintype.card_coe]
convert Fintype.card_congr (IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport hf)
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℕ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => exact fun _ h => ⟨0, h⟩
| succ n hn =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb' : (swap x (f x) * f) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, apply_inv_self, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx), Ne, ←
f.injective.eq_iff, apply_inv_self]
exact this.1
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn hb' (f.injective <| by
rw [apply_inv_self]; rwa [pow_succ', mul_apply] at h)
⟨i + 1, by
rw [add_comm, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, zpow_one, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb).2 (Ne.symm hfbx)]⟩
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℤ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
cases n with
| ofNat n => exact isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n
| negSucc n =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx' : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx'⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs <;>
simp only [inv_eq_iff_eq, Perm.mul_apply, zpow_negSucc, Ne, Perm.apply_inv_self] at *
<;> tauto
let ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n hb
(show (f⁻¹ ^ n) (f⁻¹ x) = f⁻¹ b by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, zpow_negSucc,
← inv_pow, pow_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, mul_one, zpow_natCast,
← pow_succ', ← pow_succ])
have h : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f x) = f⁻¹ x := by
rw [mul_apply, inv_apply_self, swap_apply_left]
⟨-i, by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right i 1, neg_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add, zpow_one, zpow_neg,
← inv_zpow, mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, mul_swap_eq_swap_mul, inv_apply_self, swap_comm _ x,
zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply, mul_apply (_ ^ i), h, hi, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx')]⟩
theorem IsCycle.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α}
(hf : IsCycle f) {x : α} (hfx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) = x) : f = swap x (f x) :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hz.2 hfx
if hyx : y = x then by simp [hyx]
else
if hfyx : y = f x then by simp [hfyx, hffx]
else by
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hyx hfyx]
refine by_contradiction fun hy => ?_
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hz.2 hy
rw [← sub_add_cancel j i, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi] at hj
rcases zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx (j - i) with hji | hji
· rw [← hj, hji] at hyx
tauto
· rw [← hj, hji] at hfyx
tauto
theorem IsCycle.swap_mul {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) {x : α}
(hx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) ≠ x) : IsCycle (swap x (f x) * f) :=
⟨f x, by simp [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, if_neg hffx, f.injective.eq_iff, if_neg hx, hx],
fun y hy =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy).1
have hi : (f ^ (i - 1)) (f x) = y :=
calc
(f ^ (i - 1) : Perm α) (f x) = (f ^ (i - 1) * f ^ (1 : ℤ) : Perm α) x := by simp
_ = y := by rwa [← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel]
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ (i - 1) hy hi⟩
theorem IsCycle.sign {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) : sign f = -(-1) ^ #f.support :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
calc
Perm.sign f = Perm.sign (swap x (f x) * (swap x (f x) * f)) := by
{rw [← mul_assoc, mul_def, mul_def, swap_swap, trans_refl]}
_ = -(-1) ^ #f.support :=
if h1 : f (f x) = x then by
have h : swap x (f x) * f = 1 := by
simp only [mul_def, one_def]
rw [hf.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self hx.1 h1, swap_apply_left, swap_swap]
rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, h, sign_one,
hf.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self hx.1 h1, card_support_swap hx.1.symm]
rfl
else by
have h : #(swap x (f x) * f).support + 1 = #f.support := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_support.2 hx.1), support_swap_mul_eq _ _ h1,
card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_erase _ _), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
have : #(swap x (f x) * f).support < #f.support := card_support_swap_mul hx.1
rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, (hf.swap_mul hx.1 h1).sign, ← h]
simp only [mul_neg, neg_mul, one_mul, neg_neg, pow_add, pow_one, mul_one]
termination_by #f.support
theorem IsCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h1 : IsCycle (f ^ n)) (h2 : f.support ⊆ (f ^ n).support) :
IsCycle f := by
have key : ∀ x : α, (f ^ n) x ≠ x ↔ f x ≠ x := by
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.ext_iff]
exact (support_pow_le _ n).antisymm h2
obtain ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ := h1
refine ⟨x, (key x).mp hx1, fun y hy => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ := hx2 ((key y).mpr hy)
exact ⟨n * i, by rwa [zpow_mul]⟩
-- The lemma `support_zpow_le` is relevant. It means that `h2` is equivalent to
-- `σ.support = (σ ^ n).support`, as well as to `#σ.support ≤ #(σ ^ n).support`.
theorem IsCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} (h1 : IsCycle (f ^ n)) (h2 : f.support ⊆ (f ^ n).support) :
IsCycle f := by
cases n
· exact h1.of_pow h2
· simp only [le_eq_subset, zpow_negSucc, Perm.support_inv] at h1 h2
exact (inv_inv (f ^ _) ▸ h1.inv).of_pow h2
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles {l : List (Perm β)} (h1 : ∀ f ∈ l, IsCycle f)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup :=
nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint (fun h => (h1 1 h).ne_one rfl) h2
/-- Unlike `support_congr`, which assumes that `∀ (x ∈ g.support), f x = g x)`, here
we have the weaker assumption that `∀ (x ∈ f.support), f x = g x`. -/
theorem IsCycle.support_congr (hf : IsCycle f) (hg : IsCycle g) (h : f.support ⊆ g.support)
(h' : ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
have : f.support = g.support := by
refine le_antisymm h ?_
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, _⟩ := id hf
have hx' : g x ≠ x := by rwa [← h' x (mem_support.mpr hx)]
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hg.exists_pow_eq hx' (mem_support.mp hz)
have h'' : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x := by
intro x hx
exact h' x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)
rwa [← hm, ←
pow_eq_on_of_mem_support h'' _ x
(mem_inter_of_mem (mem_support.mpr hx) (mem_support.mpr hx')),
pow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
refine Equiv.Perm.support_congr h ?_
simpa [← this] using h'
/-- If two cyclic permutations agree on all terms in their intersection,
and that intersection is not empty, then the two cyclic permutations must be equal. -/
theorem IsCycle.eq_on_support_inter_nonempty_congr (hf : IsCycle f) (hg : IsCycle g)
(h : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x)
(hx : f x = g x) (hx' : x ∈ f.support) : f = g := by
have hx'' : x ∈ g.support := by rwa [mem_support, ← hx, ← mem_support]
have : f.support ⊆ g.support := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq (mem_support.mp hx') (mem_support.mp hy)
rwa [pow_eq_on_of_mem_support h _ _ (mem_inter_of_mem hx' hx''), pow_apply_mem_support]
rw [inter_eq_left.mpr this] at h
exact hf.support_congr hg this h
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 513 | 534 | theorem IsCycle.support_pow_eq_iff (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
support (f ^ n) = support f ↔ ¬orderOf f ∣ n := by | rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
constructor
· intro h H
refine hf.ne_one ?_
rw [← support_eq_empty_iff, ← h, H, support_one]
· intro H
apply le_antisymm (support_pow_le _ n) _
intro x hx
contrapose! H
ext z
by_cases hz : f z = z
· rw [pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hz, one_apply]
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq hz (mem_support.mp hx)
apply (f ^ k).injective
rw [← mul_apply, (Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq, mul_apply]
simpa using H
theorem IsCycle.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n)
(hn : n < orderOf f) : (f ^ n).support = f.support :=
hf.support_pow_eq_iff.2 <| Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt npos hn |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-!
# Definition of well-known power series
In this file we define the following power series:
* `PowerSeries.invUnitsSub`: given `u : Rˣ`, this is the series for `1 / (u - x)`.
It is given by `∑ n, x ^ n /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)`.
* `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow`: given a commutative ring `S` and a number `d : ℕ`,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` is the multiplicative inverse of `(1 - X) ^ d` in `S⟦X⟧ˣ`.
When `d` is `0`, `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` will just be `1`. When `d` is positive,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` will be `∑ n, Nat.choose (d - 1 + n) (d - 1)`.
* `PowerSeries.sin`, `PowerSeries.cos`, `PowerSeries.exp` : power series for sin, cosine, and
exponential functions.
-/
namespace PowerSeries
section Ring
variable {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
/-- The power series for `1 / (u - x)`. -/
def invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) : PowerSeries R :=
mk fun n => 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (invUnitsSub u) = 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1) :=
coeff_mk _ _
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) : constantCoeff R (invUnitsSub u) = 1 /ₚ u := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invUnitsSub, zero_add, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem invUnitsSub_mul_X (u : Rˣ) : invUnitsSub u * X = invUnitsSub u * C R u - 1 := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp
· simp [n.succ_ne_zero, pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem invUnitsSub_mul_sub (u : Rˣ) : invUnitsSub u * (C R u - X) = 1 := by
simp [mul_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
theorem map_invUnitsSub (f : R →+* S) (u : Rˣ) :
map f (invUnitsSub u) = invUnitsSub (Units.map (f : R →* S) u) := by
ext
simp only [← map_pow, coeff_map, coeff_invUnitsSub, one_divp]
rfl
end Ring
section invOneSubPow
variable (S : Type*) [CommRing S] (d : ℕ)
/--
(1 + X + X^2 + ...) * (1 - X) = 1.
Note that the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...` is written as `mk 1` where `1` is the constant
function so that `mk 1` is the power series with all coefficients equal to one.
-/
theorem mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one : (mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) * (1 - X) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n => simp [sub_mul]
/--
Note that `mk 1` is the constant function `1` so the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...`. This theorem
states that for any `d : ℕ`, `(1 + X + X^2 + ... : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1)` is equal to the power series
`mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧`.
-/
theorem mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add :
(mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1) = (mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) := by
induction d with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ d hd =>
ext n
rw [pow_add, hd, pow_one, mul_comm, coeff_mul]
simp_rw [coeff_mk, Pi.one_apply, one_mul]
norm_cast
rw [Finset.sum_antidiagonal_choose_add, add_right_comm]
/--
Given a natural number `d : ℕ` and a commutative ring `S`, `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` is the
multiplicative inverse of `(1 - X) ^ d` in `S⟦X⟧ˣ`. When `d` is `0`, `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d`
will just be `1`. When `d` is positive, `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` will be the power series
`mk fun n => Nat.choose (d - 1 + n) (d - 1)`.
-/
noncomputable def invOneSubPow : ℕ → S⟦X⟧ˣ
| 0 => 1
| d + 1 => {
val := mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d
inv := (1 - X) ^ (d + 1)
val_inv := by
rw [← mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add, ← mul_pow, mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one, one_pow]
inv_val := by
rw [← mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add, ← mul_pow, mul_comm, mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one, one_pow]
}
theorem invOneSubPow_zero : invOneSubPow S 0 = 1 := by
delta invOneSubPow
simp only [Units.val_one]
theorem invOneSubPow_val_eq_mk_sub_one_add_choose_of_pos (h : 0 < d) :
(invOneSubPow S d).val = (mk fun n => Nat.choose (d - 1 + n) (d - 1) : S⟦X⟧) := by
rw [← Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos h, invOneSubPow, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem invOneSubPow_val_succ_eq_mk_add_choose :
(invOneSubPow S (d + 1)).val = (mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) := rfl
theorem invOneSubPow_val_one_eq_invUnitSub_one :
(invOneSubPow S 1).val = invUnitsSub (1 : Sˣ) := by
simp [invOneSubPow, invUnitsSub]
/--
The theorem `PowerSeries.mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one` implies that `1 - X` is a unit in `S⟦X⟧`
whose inverse is the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...`. This theorem states that for any `d : ℕ`,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` is equal to `(1 - X)⁻¹ ^ d`.
-/
theorem invOneSubPow_eq_inv_one_sub_pow :
invOneSubPow S d =
(Units.mkOfMulEqOne (1 - X) (mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) <|
Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) (mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one S))⁻¹ ^ d := by
induction d with
| zero => exact Eq.symm <| pow_zero _
| succ d _ =>
rw [inv_pow]
exact (DivisionMonoid.inv_eq_of_mul _ (invOneSubPow S (d + 1)) <| by
rw [← Units.val_eq_one, Units.val_mul, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
exact (invOneSubPow S (d + 1)).inv_val).symm
theorem invOneSubPow_inv_eq_one_sub_pow :
(invOneSubPow S d).inv = (1 - X : S⟦X⟧) ^ d := by
induction d with
| zero => exact Eq.symm <| pow_zero _
| succ d => rfl
theorem invOneSubPow_inv_zero_eq_one : (invOneSubPow S 0).inv = 1 := by
delta invOneSubPow
simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, inv_one, Units.val_one]
theorem mk_add_choose_mul_one_sub_pow_eq_one :
(mk fun n ↦ Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) * ((1 - X) ^ (d + 1)) = 1 :=
(invOneSubPow S (d + 1)).val_inv
theorem invOneSubPow_add (e : ℕ) :
invOneSubPow S (d + e) = invOneSubPow S d * invOneSubPow S e := by
simp_rw [invOneSubPow_eq_inv_one_sub_pow, pow_add]
theorem one_sub_pow_mul_invOneSubPow_val_add_eq_invOneSubPow_val (e : ℕ) :
(1 - X) ^ e * (invOneSubPow S (d + e)).val = (invOneSubPow S d).val := by
simp [invOneSubPow_add, Units.val_mul, mul_comm, mul_assoc, ← invOneSubPow_inv_eq_one_sub_pow]
theorem one_sub_pow_add_mul_invOneSubPow_val_eq_one_sub_pow (e : ℕ) :
(1 - X) ^ (d + e) * (invOneSubPow S e).val = (1 - X) ^ d := by
simp [pow_add, mul_assoc, ← invOneSubPow_inv_eq_one_sub_pow S e]
end invOneSubPow
section Field
variable (A A' : Type*) [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A']
open Nat
/-- Power series for the exponential function at zero. -/
def exp : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !)
/-- Power series for the sine function at zero. -/
def sin : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then 0 else algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !)
/-- Power series for the cosine function at zero. -/
def cos : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !) else 0
variable {A A'} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_exp : coeff A n (exp A) = algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !) :=
coeff_mk _ _
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_exp : constantCoeff A (exp A) = 1 := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_exp]
simp
variable (f : A →+* A')
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/WellKnown.lean | 206 | 208 | theorem map_exp : map (f : A →+* A') (exp A) = exp A' := by | ext
simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ.OrderedMonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas about filters and ordered rings.
-/
namespace Filter
open Function Filter
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Ring.lean | 20 | 23 | theorem EventuallyLE.mul_le_mul [MulZeroClass β] [Preorder β] [PosMulMono β] [MulPosMono β]
{l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) (hg₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] g₁)
(hf₀ : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ * g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ * g₂ := by | filter_upwards [hf, hg, hg₀, hf₀] with x using _root_.mul_le_mul |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
/-!
# Local properties invariant under a groupoid
We study properties of a triple `(g, s, x)` where `g` is a function between two spaces `H` and `H'`,
`s` is a subset of `H` and `x` is a point of `H`. Our goal is to register how such a property
should behave to make sense in charted spaces modelled on `H` and `H'`.
The main examples we have in mind are the properties "`g` is differentiable at `x` within `s`", or
"`g` is smooth at `x` within `s`". We want to develop general results that, when applied in these
specific situations, say that the notion of smooth function in a manifold behaves well under
restriction, intersection, is local, and so on.
## Main definitions
* `LocalInvariantProp G G' P` says that a property `P` of a triple `(g, s, x)` is local, and
invariant under composition by elements of the groupoids `G` and `G'` of `H` and `H'`
respectively.
* `ChartedSpace.LiftPropWithinAt` (resp. `LiftPropAt`, `LiftPropOn` and `LiftProp`):
given a property `P` of `(g, s, x)` where `g : H → H'`, define the corresponding property
for functions `M → M'` where `M` and `M'` are charted spaces modelled respectively on `H` and
`H'`. We define these properties within a set at a point, or at a point, or on a set, or in the
whole space. This lifting process (obtained by restricting to suitable chart domains) can always
be done, but it only behaves well under locality and invariance assumptions.
Given `hG : LocalInvariantProp G G' P`, we deduce many properties of the lifted property on the
charted spaces. For instance, `hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter` says that `P g s x` is equivalent to
`P g (s ∩ t) x` whenever `t` is a neighborhood of `x`.
## Implementation notes
We do not use dot notation for properties of the lifted property. For instance, we have
`hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr` saying that if `LiftPropWithinAt P g s x` holds, and `g` and `g'`
coincide on `s`, then `LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x` holds. We can't call it
`LiftPropWithinAt.congr` as it is in the namespace associated to `LocalInvariantProp`, not
in the one for `LiftPropWithinAt`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped Manifold Topology
variable {H M H' M' X : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
variable [TopologicalSpace H'] [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
namespace StructureGroupoid
variable (G : StructureGroupoid H) (G' : StructureGroupoid H')
/-- Structure recording good behavior of a property of a triple `(f, s, x)` where `f` is a function,
`s` a set and `x` a point. Good behavior here means locality and invariance under given groupoids
(both in the source and in the target). Given such a good behavior, the lift of this property
to charted spaces admitting these groupoids will inherit the good behavior. -/
structure LocalInvariantProp (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) : Prop where
is_local : ∀ {s x u} {f : H → H'}, IsOpen u → x ∈ u → (P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x)
right_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H},
e ∈ G → x ∈ e.source → P f s x → P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x)
congr_of_forall : ∀ {s x} {f g : H → H'}, (∀ y ∈ s, f y = g y) → f x = g x → P f s x → P g s x
left_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'},
e' ∈ G' → s ⊆ f ⁻¹' e'.source → f x ∈ e'.source → P f s x → P (e' ∘ f) s x
variable {G G'} {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop}
variable (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G' P)
include hG
namespace LocalInvariantProp
theorem congr_set {s t : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : P f s x ↔ P f t x := by
obtain ⟨o, host, ho, hxo⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hu.mem_iff
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf, ← and_congr_left_iff, ← mem_inter_iff, ← Set.ext_iff] at host
rw [hG.is_local ho hxo, host, ← hG.is_local ho hxo]
theorem is_local_nhds {s u : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x :=
hG.congr_set <| mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.mp hu
theorem congr_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g)
(h2 : f x = g x) : P f s x ↔ P g s x := by
simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h1]
exact ⟨hG.congr_of_forall (fun y hy ↦ hy.2) h2, hG.congr_of_forall (fun y hy ↦ hy.2.symm) h2.symm⟩
theorem congr_nhdsWithin {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin h1 h2).mp hP
theorem congr_nhdsWithin' {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin h1 h2).mpr hP
theorem congr_iff {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : P f s x ↔ P g s x :=
hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h) (mem_of_mem_nhds h :)
theorem congr {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff h).mp hP
theorem congr' {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
hG.congr h.symm hP
theorem left_invariance {s : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'}
(he' : e' ∈ G') (hfs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hxe' : f x ∈ e'.source) :
P (e' ∘ f) s x ↔ P f s x := by
have h2f := hfs.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (e'.open_source.mem_nhds hxe')
have h3f :=
((e'.continuousAt hxe').comp_continuousWithinAt hfs).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin <|
e'.symm.open_source.mem_nhds <| e'.mapsTo hxe'
constructor
· intro h
rw [hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h
have h2 := hG.left_invariance' (G'.symm he') inter_subset_right (e'.mapsTo hxe') h
rw [← hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h2
refine hG.congr_nhdsWithin ?_ (e'.left_inv hxe') h2
exact eventually_of_mem h2f fun x' ↦ e'.left_inv
· simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h2f]
exact hG.left_invariance' he' inter_subset_right hxe'
theorem right_invariance {s : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G)
(hxe : x ∈ e.source) : P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hG.right_invariance' he hxe⟩
have := hG.right_invariance' (G.symm he) (e.mapsTo hxe) h
rw [e.symm_symm, e.left_inv hxe] at this
refine hG.congr ?_ ((hG.congr_set ?_).mp this)
· refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) fun x' hx' ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hx']
· rw [eventuallyEq_set]
refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) fun x' hx' ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_preimage, e.left_inv hx']
end LocalInvariantProp
end StructureGroupoid
namespace ChartedSpace
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property in a charted space, by requiring that it holds at the preferred chart at
this point. (When the property is local and invariant, it will in fact hold using any chart, see
`liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`). We require continuity in the lifted property, as otherwise one
single chart might fail to capture the behavior of the function.
-/
@[mk_iff liftPropWithinAt_iff']
structure LiftPropWithinAt (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :
Prop where
continuousWithinAt : ContinuousWithinAt f s x
prop : P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) ((chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chartAt H x x)
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of functions on sets in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
around each point of the set, in the preferred charts. -/
def LiftPropOn (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LiftPropWithinAt P f s x
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function at a point in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart. -/
def LiftPropAt (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
LiftPropWithinAt P f univ x
theorem liftPropAt_iff {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} {x : M} :
LiftPropAt P f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) univ (chartAt H x x) := by
rw [LiftPropAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ]
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart around every point. -/
def LiftProp (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') :=
∀ x, LiftPropAt P f x
theorem liftProp_iff {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} :
LiftProp P f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ x, P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) univ (chartAt H x x) := by
simp_rw [LiftProp, liftPropAt_iff, forall_and, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
end ChartedSpace
open ChartedSpace
namespace StructureGroupoid
variable {G : StructureGroupoid H} {G' : StructureGroupoid H'} {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H}
{f f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {g g' : M → M'} {s t : Set M}
{x : M} {Q : (H → H) → Set H → H → Prop}
theorem liftPropWithinAt_univ : LiftPropWithinAt P g univ x ↔ LiftPropAt P g x := Iff.rfl
theorem liftPropOn_univ : LiftPropOn P g univ ↔ LiftProp P g := by
simp [LiftPropOn, LiftProp, LiftPropAt]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self {f : H → H'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ P f s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self_source {f : H → M'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f) s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self_target {f : M → H'} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
P (f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) ((chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chartAt H x x) :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
namespace LocalInvariantProp
section
variable (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G' P)
include hG
/-- `LiftPropWithinAt P f s x` is equivalent to a definition where we restrict the set we are
considering to the domain of the charts at `x` and `f x`. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_iff {f : M → M'} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm)
((chartAt H x).target ∩ (chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (chartAt H' (f x)).source))
(chartAt H x x) := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr_right fun hf ↦ hG.congr_set ?_
exact PartialHomeomorph.preimage_eventuallyEq_target_inter_preimage_inter hf
(mem_chart_source H x) (chart_source_mem_nhds H' (f x))
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source_aux (g : M → H') (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M)
(xe : x ∈ e.source) (he' : e' ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe' : x ∈ e'.source) :
P (g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (g ∘ e'.symm) (e'.symm ⁻¹' s) (e' x) := by
rw [← hG.right_invariance (compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he')]
swap; · simp only [xe, xe', mfld_simps]
simp_rw [PartialHomeomorph.trans_apply, e.left_inv xe]
rw [hG.congr_iff]
· refine hG.congr_set ?_
refine (eventually_of_mem ?_ fun y (hy : y ∈ e'.symm ⁻¹' e.source) ↦ ?_).set_eq
· refine (e'.symm.continuousAt <| e'.mapsTo xe').preimage_mem_nhds (e.open_source.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [e'.left_inv xe', xe]
simp_rw [mem_preimage, PartialHomeomorph.coe_trans_symm, PartialHomeomorph.symm_symm,
Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hy]
· refine ((e'.eventually_nhds' _ xe').mpr <| e.eventually_left_inverse xe).mono fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mfld_simps]
rw [hy]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux2 (g : H → M') {x : H} {s : Set H}
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source) (hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf' : g x ∈ f'.source) (hgs : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) : P (f ∘ g) s x ↔ P (f' ∘ g) s x := by
have hcont : ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ g) s x := (f.continuousAt xf).comp_continuousWithinAt hgs
rw [← hG.left_invariance (compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf hf') hcont
(by simp only [xf, xf', mfld_simps])]
refine hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin ?_ (by simp only [xf, mfld_simps])
exact (hgs.eventually <| f.eventually_left_inverse xf).mono fun y ↦ congr_arg f'
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux {g : X → M'} {e : PartialHomeomorph X H} {x : X}
{s : Set X} (xe : x ∈ e.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source)
(hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source) (hgs : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (f' ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
rw [← e.left_inv xe] at xf xf' hgs
refine hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux2 (g ∘ e.symm) hf xf hf' xf' ?_
exact hgs.comp (e.symm.continuousAt <| e.mapsTo xe).continuousWithinAt Subset.rfl
/-- If a property of a germ of function `g` on a pointed set `(s, x)` is invariant under the
structure groupoid (by composition in the source space and in the target space), then
expressing it in charted spaces does not depend on the element of the maximal atlas one uses
both in the source and in the target manifolds, provided they are defined around `x` and `g x`
respectively, and provided `g` is continuous within `s` at `x` (otherwise, the local behavior
of `g` at `x` can not be captured with a chart in the target). -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_aux (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(he' : e' ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe' : x ∈ e'.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) (hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source)
(hgs : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (f' ∘ g ∘ e'.symm) (e'.symm ⁻¹' s) (e' x) := by
rw [← Function.comp_assoc, hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source_aux (f ∘ g) he xe he' xe',
Function.comp_assoc, hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux xe' hf xf hf' xf' hgs]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart [HasGroupoid M G] [HasGroupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ∧ P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
simp only [liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right <|
hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_aux (chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) he xe
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) hf xf
/-- A version of `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`, only for the source. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source [HasGroupoid M G] (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M)
(xe : x ∈ e.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P (g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_self_source, liftPropWithinAt_iff',
e.symm.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right xe, e.symm_symm]
refine and_congr Iff.rfl ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv xe, ← Function.comp_assoc,
hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source_aux (chartAt _ (g x) ∘ g) (chart_mem_maximalAtlas G x)
(mem_chart_source _ x) he xe, Function.comp_assoc]
/-- A version of `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`, only for the target. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target [HasGroupoid M' G'] (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x ∧ LiftPropWithinAt P (f ∘ g) s x := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_self_target, liftPropWithinAt_iff', and_congr_right_iff]
intro hg
simp_rw [(f.continuousAt xf).comp_continuousWithinAt hg, true_and]
exact hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux (mem_chart_source _ _)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) hf xf hg
/-- A version of `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`, that uses `LiftPropWithinAt` on both sides. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart' [HasGroupoid M G] [HasGroupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ∧ LiftPropWithinAt P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
rw [hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he xe hf xf, liftPropWithinAt_self, and_left_comm,
Iff.comm, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
intro h
have h1 := (e.symm.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right xe).mp h.1
have : ContinuousAt f ((g ∘ e.symm) (e x)) := by
simp_rw [Function.comp, e.left_inv xe, f.continuousAt xf]
exact this.comp_continuousWithinAt h1
theorem liftPropOn_indep_chart [HasGroupoid M G] [HasGroupoid M' G'] (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M)
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (h : LiftPropOn P g s) {y : H}
(hy : y ∈ e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ g ⁻¹' f.source)) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) y := by
convert ((hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he (e.symm_mapsTo hy.1) hf hy.2.2).1 (h _ hy.2.1)).2
rw [e.right_inv hy.1]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g (s ∩ t) x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_iff', liftPropWithinAt_iff', continuousWithinAt_inter' ht, hG.congr_set]
simp_rw [eventuallyEq_set, mem_preimage,
(chartAt _ x).eventually_nhds' (fun x ↦ x ∈ s ∩ t ↔ x ∈ s) (mem_chart_source _ x)]
exact (mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.mp ht).symm.mem_iff
theorem liftPropWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g (s ∩ t) x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x :=
hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter' (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ht)
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_set (hu : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g t x := by
rw [← hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter (s := s) hu, ← hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter (s := t) hu,
← eq_iff_iff]
congr 1
aesop
theorem liftPropAt_of_liftPropWithinAt (h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
LiftPropAt P g x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter hs] at h
theorem liftPropWithinAt_of_liftPropAt_of_mem_nhds (h : LiftPropAt P g x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter hs]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/LocalInvariantProperties.lean | 356 | 361 | theorem liftPropOn_of_locally_liftPropOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ LiftPropOn P g (s ∩ u)) : LiftPropOn P g s := by | intro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩
have := hu x ⟨hx, xu⟩
rwa [hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter] at this |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 116 | 118 | theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by | simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.CancelLeads
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
/-!
# GCD structures on polynomials
Definitions and basic results about polynomials over GCD domains, particularly their contents
and primitive polynomials.
## Main Definitions
Let `p : R[X]`.
- `p.content` is the `gcd` of the coefficients of `p`.
- `p.IsPrimitive` indicates that `p.content = 1`.
## Main Results
- `Polynomial.content_mul`:
If `p q : R[X]`, then `(p * q).content = p.content * q.content`.
- `Polynomial.NormalizedGcdMonoid`:
The polynomial ring of a GCD domain is itself a GCD domain.
## Note
This has nothing to do with minimal polynomials of primitive elements in finite fields.
-/
namespace Polynomial
section Primitive
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- A polynomial is primitive when the only constant polynomials dividing it are units.
Note: This has nothing to do with minimal polynomials of primitive elements in finite fields. -/
def IsPrimitive (p : R[X]) : Prop :=
∀ r : R, C r ∣ p → IsUnit r
theorem isPrimitive_iff_isUnit_of_C_dvd {p : R[X]} : p.IsPrimitive ↔ ∀ r : R, C r ∣ p → IsUnit r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isPrimitive_one : IsPrimitive (1 : R[X]) := fun _ h =>
isUnit_C.mp (isUnit_of_dvd_one h)
theorem Monic.isPrimitive {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.IsPrimitive := by
rintro r ⟨q, h⟩
exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one r (q.coeff p.natDegree) (by rwa [← coeff_C_mul, ← h])
theorem IsPrimitive.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.IsPrimitive) : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact (hp 0 (dvd_zero (C 0))).ne_zero rfl
theorem isPrimitive_of_dvd {p q : R[X]} (hp : IsPrimitive p) (hq : q ∣ p) : IsPrimitive q :=
fun a ha => isPrimitive_iff_isUnit_of_C_dvd.mp hp a (dvd_trans ha hq)
/-- An irreducible nonconstant polynomial over a domain is primitive. -/
theorem _root_.Irreducible.isPrimitive [NoZeroDivisors R]
{p : Polynomial R} (hp : Irreducible p) (hp' : p.natDegree ≠ 0) : p.IsPrimitive := by
rintro r ⟨q, hq⟩
suffices ¬IsUnit q by simpa using ((hp.2 hq).resolve_right this).map Polynomial.constantCoeff
intro H
have hr : r ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp_all
obtain ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩ := Polynomial.isUnit_iff.mp H
simp [hq, Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul hr] at hp'
end Primitive
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
section NormalizedGCDMonoid
variable [NormalizedGCDMonoid R]
/-- `p.content` is the `gcd` of the coefficients of `p`. -/
def content (p : R[X]) : R :=
p.support.gcd p.coeff
theorem content_dvd_coeff {p : R[X]} (n : ℕ) : p.content ∣ p.coeff n := by
by_cases h : n ∈ p.support
· apply Finset.gcd_dvd h
rw [mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not] at h
rw [h]
apply dvd_zero
@[simp]
theorem content_C {r : R} : (C r).content = normalize r := by
rw [content]
by_cases h0 : r = 0
· simp [h0]
have h : (C r).support = {0} := support_monomial _ h0
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem content_zero : content (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by rw [← C_0, content_C, normalize_zero]
@[simp]
theorem content_one : content (1 : R[X]) = 1 := by rw [← C_1, content_C, normalize_one]
theorem content_X_mul {p : R[X]} : content (X * p) = content p := by
rw [content, content, Finset.gcd_def, Finset.gcd_def]
refine congr rfl ?_
have h : (X * p).support = p.support.map ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩ := by
ext a
simp only [exists_prop, Finset.mem_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Ne, mem_support_iff]
rcases a with - | a
· simp [coeff_X_mul_zero, Nat.succ_ne_zero]
rw [mul_comm, coeff_mul_X]
constructor
· intro h
use a
· rintro ⟨b, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
rw [← Nat.succ_injective h2]
apply h1
rw [h]
simp only [Finset.map_val, Function.comp_apply, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Multiset.map_map]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) rfl
ext a
rw [mul_comm]
simp [coeff_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem content_X_pow {k : ℕ} : content ((X : R[X]) ^ k) = 1 := by
induction' k with k hi
· simp
rw [pow_succ', content_X_mul, hi]
@[simp]
theorem content_X : content (X : R[X]) = 1 := by rw [← mul_one X, content_X_mul, content_one]
theorem content_C_mul (r : R) (p : R[X]) : (C r * p).content = normalize r * p.content := by
by_cases h0 : r = 0; · simp [h0]
rw [content]; rw [content]; rw [← Finset.gcd_mul_left]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) ?_ <;> ext <;> simp [h0, mem_support_iff]
@[simp]
theorem content_monomial {r : R} {k : ℕ} : content (monomial k r) = normalize r := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, content_C_mul, content_X_pow, mul_one]
theorem content_eq_zero_iff {p : R[X]} : content p = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
rw [content, Finset.gcd_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· ext n
by_cases h0 : n ∈ p.support
· rw [h n h0, coeff_zero]
· rw [mem_support_iff] at h0
push_neg at h0
simp [h0]
· intro x
simp [h]
-- Porting note: this reduced with simp so created `normUnit_content` and put simp on it
theorem normalize_content {p : R[X]} : normalize p.content = p.content :=
Finset.normalize_gcd
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_content {p : R[X]} : normUnit (content p) = 1 := by
by_cases hp0 : p.content = 0
· simp [hp0]
· ext
apply mul_left_cancel₀ hp0
rw [← normalize_apply, normalize_content, Units.val_one, mul_one]
theorem content_eq_gcd_range_of_lt (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.natDegree < n) :
p.content = (Finset.range n).gcd p.coeff := by
apply dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq normalize_content Finset.normalize_gcd
· rw [Finset.dvd_gcd_iff]
intro i _
apply content_dvd_coeff _
· apply Finset.gcd_mono
intro i
simp only [Nat.lt_succ_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_range]
contrapose!
intro h1
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h h1)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Content.lean | 184 | 195 | theorem content_eq_gcd_range_succ (p : R[X]) :
p.content = (Finset.range p.natDegree.succ).gcd p.coeff :=
content_eq_gcd_range_of_lt _ _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
theorem content_eq_gcd_leadingCoeff_content_eraseLead (p : R[X]) :
p.content = GCDMonoid.gcd p.leadingCoeff (eraseLead p).content := by | by_cases h : p = 0
· simp [h]
rw [← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, leadingCoeff, ← Ne, ← mem_support_iff] at h
rw [content, ← Finset.insert_erase h, Finset.gcd_insert, leadingCoeff, content,
eraseLead_support]
refine congr rfl (Finset.gcd_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih =>
rw [repeatEq]
exact i_ih
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih => apply @i_ih (drop α)
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
ext i a
induction i with
| fz => cases a; rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem append_prod_appendFun {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n} {φ φ' ψ ψ' : Type u}
{f₀ : α ⟹ α'} {g₀ : β ⟹ β'} {f₁ : φ → φ'} {g₁ : ψ → ψ'} :
((f₀ ⊗' g₀) ::: (_root_.Prod.map f₁ g₁)) = ((f₀ ::: f₁) ⊗' (g₀ ::: g₁)) := by
ext i a
cases i
· cases a
rfl
· rfl
end Liftp'
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_diag {α} : dropFun (@prod.diag (n + 1) α) = prod.diag := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (subtypeVal p) = subtypeVal _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (subtypeVal p) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (toSubtype p) = toSubtype _ := by
ext i
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (toSubtype p) = _root_.id := by
ext i : 2
induction i; simp [dropFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (ofSubtype p) = ofSubtype _ := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (ofSubtype p) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_RelLast' {α : TypeVec n} {β} (R : β → β → Prop) :
dropFun (RelLast' α R) = repeatEq α :=
rfl
attribute [simp] drop_append1'
open MvFunctor
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
dropFun (f ⊗' f') = (dropFun f ⊗' dropFun f') := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
lastFun (f ⊗' f') = Prod.map (lastFun f) (lastFun f') := by
ext i : 1
induction i; simp [lastFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
dropFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
lastFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_id {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : dropFun (@TypeVec.id _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 645 | 649 | theorem prod_map_id {α β : TypeVec n} : (@TypeVec.id _ α ⊗' @TypeVec.id _ β) = id := by | ext i x : 2
induction i <;> simp only [TypeVec.prod.map, *, dropFun_id]
cases x
· rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Regular
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
/-!
# Cardinal of sigma-algebras
If a sigma-algebra is generated by a set of sets `s`, then the cardinality of the sigma-algebra is
bounded by `(max #s 2) ^ ℵ₀`. This is stated in `MeasurableSpace.cardinal_generate_measurable_le`
and `MeasurableSpace.cardinalMeasurableSet_le`.
In particular, if `#s ≤ 𝔠`, then the generated sigma-algebra has cardinality at most `𝔠`, see
`MeasurableSpace.cardinal_measurableSet_le_continuum`.
For the proof, we rely on an explicit inductive construction of the sigma-algebra generated by
`s` (instead of the inductive predicate `GenerateMeasurable`). This transfinite inductive
construction is parameterized by an ordinal `< ω₁`, and the cardinality bound is preserved along
each step of the construction. We show in `MeasurableSpace.generateMeasurable_eq_rec` that this
indeed generates this sigma-algebra.
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u}
open Cardinal Ordinal Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
/-- Transfinite induction construction of the sigma-algebra generated by a set of sets `s`. At each
step, we add all elements of `s`, the empty set, the complements of already constructed sets, and
countable unions of already constructed sets.
We index this construction by an arbitrary ordinal for simplicity, but by `ω₁` we will have
generated all the sets in the sigma-algebra.
This construction is very similar to that of the Borel hierarchy. -/
def generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) : Set (Set α) :=
let S := ⋃ j < i, generateMeasurableRec s j
s ∪ {∅} ∪ compl '' S ∪ Set.range fun f : ℕ → S => ⋃ n, (f n).1
termination_by i
theorem self_subset_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) :
s ⊆ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
apply_rules [subset_union_of_subset_left]
exact subset_rfl
theorem empty_mem_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) :
∅ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ (mem_singleton ∅)))
theorem compl_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i j : Ordinal} (h : j < i) {t : Set α}
(ht : t ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) : tᶜ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ ⟨t, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨j, h, ht⟩, rfl⟩)
theorem iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i : Ordinal} {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf : ∀ n, ∃ j < i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) :
⋃ n, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_right _ ⟨fun n => ⟨f n, let ⟨j, hj, hf⟩ := hf n; mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨j, hj, hf⟩⟩, rfl⟩
theorem generateMeasurableRec_mono (s : Set (Set α)) : Monotone (generateMeasurableRec s) := by
intro i j h x hx
rcases h.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h)
· exact hx
· convert iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec fun _ => ⟨i, h, hx⟩
exact (iUnion_const x).symm
/-- An inductive principle for the elements of `generateMeasurableRec`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Card.lean | 81 | 86 | theorem generateMeasurableRec_induction {s : Set (Set α)} {i : Ordinal} {t : Set α}
{p : Set α → Prop} (hs : ∀ t ∈ s, p t) (h0 : p ∅)
(hc : ∀ u, p u → (∃ j < i, u ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) → p uᶜ)
(hn : ∀ f : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, p (f n) ∧ ∃ j < i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) → p (⋃ n, f n)) :
t ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i → p t := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta.Basic
/-!
# Baire spaces
A topological space is called a *Baire space*
if a countable intersection of dense open subsets is dense.
Baire theorems say that all completely metrizable spaces
and all locally compact regular spaces are Baire spaces.
We prove the theorems in `Mathlib/Topology/Baire/CompleteMetrizable`
and `Mathlib/Topology/Baire/LocallyCompactRegular`.
In this file we prove various corollaries of Baire theorems.
The good concept underlying the theorems is that of a Gδ set, i.e., a countable intersection
of open sets. Then Baire theorem can also be formulated as the fact that a countable
intersection of dense Gδ sets is a dense Gδ set. We deduce this version from Baire property.
We also prove the important consequence that, if the space is
covered by a countable union of closed sets, then the union of their interiors is dense.
We also prove that in Baire spaces, the `residual` sets are exactly those containing a dense Gδ set.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace
variable {X α : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section BaireTheorem
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [BaireSpace X]
/-- Definition of a Baire space. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_isOpen_nat {f : ℕ → Set X} (ho : ∀ n, IsOpen (f n))
(hd : ∀ n, Dense (f n)) : Dense (⋂ n, f n) :=
BaireSpace.baire_property f ho hd
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with ⋂₀. -/
theorem dense_sInter_of_isOpen {S : Set (Set X)} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) (hS : S.Countable)
(hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense s) : Dense (⋂₀ S) := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
· rcases hS.exists_eq_range h with ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact dense_iInter_of_isOpen_nat (forall_mem_range.1 ho) (forall_mem_range.1 hd)
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable set in any type. -/
theorem dense_biInter_of_isOpen {S : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen (f s))
(hS : S.Countable) (hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense (f s)) : Dense (⋂ s ∈ S, f s) := by
rw [← sInter_image]
refine dense_sInter_of_isOpen ?_ (hS.image _) ?_ <;> rwa [forall_mem_image]
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable type. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_isOpen [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i))
(hd : ∀ i, Dense (f i)) : Dense (⋂ s, f s) :=
dense_sInter_of_isOpen (forall_mem_range.2 ho) (countable_range _) (forall_mem_range.2 hd)
/-- A set is residual (comeagre) if and only if it includes a dense `Gδ` set. -/
theorem mem_residual {s : Set X} : s ∈ residual X ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsGδ t ∧ Dense t := by
constructor
· rw [mem_residual_iff]
rintro ⟨S, hSo, hSd, Sct, Ss⟩
refine ⟨_, Ss, ⟨_, fun t ht => hSo _ ht, Sct, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact dense_sInter_of_isOpen hSo Sct hSd
rintro ⟨t, ts, ho, hd⟩
exact mem_of_superset (residual_of_dense_Gδ ho hd) ts
/-- A property holds on a residual (comeagre) set if and only if it holds on some dense `Gδ` set. -/
theorem eventually_residual {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in residual X, p x) ↔ ∃ t : Set X, IsGδ t ∧ Dense t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Eventually, mem_residual, subset_def, mem_setOf_eq]
tauto
theorem dense_of_mem_residual {s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ residual X) : Dense s :=
let ⟨_, hts, _, hd⟩ := mem_residual.1 hs
hd.mono hts
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with ⋂₀. -/
theorem dense_sInter_of_Gδ {S : Set (Set X)} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsGδ s) (hS : S.Countable)
(hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense s) : Dense (⋂₀ S) :=
dense_of_mem_residual ((countable_sInter_mem hS).mpr
(fun _ hs => residual_of_dense_Gδ (ho _ hs) (hd _ hs)))
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable type. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_Gδ [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set X} (ho : ∀ s, IsGδ (f s))
(hd : ∀ s, Dense (f s)) : Dense (⋂ s, f s) :=
dense_sInter_of_Gδ (forall_mem_range.2 ‹_›) (countable_range _) (forall_mem_range.2 ‹_›)
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable set in any type. -/
theorem dense_biInter_of_Gδ {S : Set α} {f : ∀ x ∈ S, Set X} (ho : ∀ s (H : s ∈ S), IsGδ (f s H))
(hS : S.Countable) (hd : ∀ s (H : s ∈ S), Dense (f s H)) : Dense (⋂ s ∈ S, f s ‹_›) := by
rw [biInter_eq_iInter]
haveI := hS.to_subtype
exact dense_iInter_of_Gδ (fun s => ho s s.2) fun s => hd s s.2
/-- Baire theorem: the intersection of two dense Gδ sets is dense. -/
theorem Dense.inter_of_Gδ {s t : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s) (ht : IsGδ t) (hsc : Dense s)
(htc : Dense t) : Dense (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_eq_iInter]
apply dense_iInter_of_Gδ <;> simp [Bool.forall_bool, *]
/-- If a countable family of closed sets cover a dense `Gδ` set, then the union of their interiors
is dense. Formulated here with `⋃`. -/
theorem IsGδ.dense_iUnion_interior_of_closed [Countable ι] {s : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s) (hd : Dense s)
{f : ι → Set X} (hc : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, f i) :
Dense (⋃ i, interior (f i)) := by
let g i := (frontier (f i))ᶜ
have hgo : ∀ i, IsOpen (g i) := fun i => isClosed_frontier.isOpen_compl
have hgd : Dense (⋂ i, g i) := by
refine dense_iInter_of_isOpen hgo fun i x => ?_
rw [closure_compl, interior_frontier (hc _)]
exact id
refine (hd.inter_of_Gδ hs (.iInter_of_isOpen fun i => (hgo i)) hgd).mono ?_
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxg⟩
rw [mem_iInter] at hxg
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hU hxs) with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, self_diff_frontier (f i) ▸ ⟨hi, hxg _⟩⟩
/-- If a countable family of closed sets cover a dense `Gδ` set, then the union of their interiors
is dense. Formulated here with a union over a countable set in any type. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Baire/Lemmas.lean | 132 | 145 | theorem IsGδ.dense_biUnion_interior_of_closed {t : Set α} {s : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s) (hd : Dense s)
(ht : t.Countable) {f : α → Set X} (hc : ∀ i ∈ t, IsClosed (f i)) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, f i) :
Dense (⋃ i ∈ t, interior (f i)) := by | haveI := ht.to_subtype
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall'] at *
exact hs.dense_iUnion_interior_of_closed hd hc hU
/-- If a countable family of closed sets cover a dense `Gδ` set, then the union of their interiors
is dense. Formulated here with `⋃₀`. -/
theorem IsGδ.dense_sUnion_interior_of_closed {T : Set (Set X)} {s : Set X} (hs : IsGδ s)
(hd : Dense s) (hc : T.Countable) (hc' : ∀ t ∈ T, IsClosed t) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃₀ T) :
Dense (⋃ t ∈ T, interior t) :=
hs.dense_biUnion_interior_of_closed hd hc hc' <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann, Kyle Miller, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Fibonacci Numbers
This file defines the fibonacci series, proves results about it and introduces
methods to compute it quickly.
-/
/-!
# The Fibonacci Sequence
## Summary
Definition of the Fibonacci sequence `F₀ = 0, F₁ = 1, Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁`.
## Main Definitions
- `Nat.fib` returns the stream of Fibonacci numbers.
## Main Statements
- `Nat.fib_add_two`: shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.`.
- `Nat.fib_gcd`: `fib n` is a strong divisibility sequence.
- `Nat.fib_succ_eq_sum_choose`: `fib` is given by the sum of `Nat.choose` along an antidiagonal.
- `Nat.fib_succ_eq_succ_sum`: shows that `F₀ + F₁ + ⋯ + Fₙ = Fₙ₊₂ - 1`.
- `Nat.fib_two_mul` and `Nat.fib_two_mul_add_one` are the basis for an efficient algorithm to
compute `fib` (see `Nat.fastFib`).
## Implementation Notes
For efficiency purposes, the sequence is defined using `Stream.iterate`.
## Tags
fib, fibonacci
-/
namespace Nat
/-- Implementation of the fibonacci sequence satisfying
`fib 0 = 0, fib 1 = 1, fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1)`.
*Note:* We use a stream iterator for better performance when compared to the naive recursive
implementation.
-/
@[pp_nodot]
def fib (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.snd, p.fst + p.snd))^[n] (0, 1)).fst
@[simp]
theorem fib_zero : fib 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fib_one : fib 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fib_two : fib 2 = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.` -/
theorem fib_add_two {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1) := by
simp [fib, Function.iterate_succ_apply']
lemma fib_add_one : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → fib (n + 1) = fib (n - 1) + fib n
| _n + 1, _ => fib_add_two
theorem fib_le_fib_succ {n : ℕ} : fib n ≤ fib (n + 1) := by cases n <;> simp [fib_add_two]
@[mono]
theorem fib_mono : Monotone fib :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun _ => fib_le_fib_succ
@[simp] lemma fib_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, fib n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| 1 => Iff.rfl
| n + 2 => by simp [fib_add_two, fib_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma fib_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < fib n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem fib_add_two_sub_fib_add_one {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) - fib (n + 1) = fib n := by
rw [fib_add_two, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem fib_lt_fib_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : fib n < fib (n + 1) := by
rcases exists_add_of_le hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← tsub_pos_iff_lt, add_comm 2, add_right_comm, fib_add_two, add_tsub_cancel_right, fib_pos]
exact succ_pos n
/-- `fib (n + 2)` is strictly monotone. -/
theorem fib_add_two_strictMono : StrictMono fun n => fib (n + 2) := by
refine strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => ?_
rw [add_right_comm]
exact fib_lt_fib_succ (self_le_add_left _ _)
lemma fib_strictMonoOn : StrictMonoOn fib (Set.Ici 2)
| _m + 2, _, _n + 2, _, hmn => fib_add_two_strictMono <| lt_of_add_lt_add_right hmn
lemma fib_lt_fib {m : ℕ} (hm : 2 ≤ m) : ∀ {n}, fib m < fib n ↔ m < n
| 0 => by simp [hm]
| 1 => by simp [hm]
| n + 2 => fib_strictMonoOn.lt_iff_lt hm <| by simp
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Fib/Basic.lean | 120 | 123 | theorem le_fib_self {n : ℕ} (five_le_n : 5 ≤ n) : n ≤ fib n := by | induction' five_le_n with n five_le_n IH
· -- 5 ≤ fib 5
rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| Nat.zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 365 | 373 | theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {Y} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by | refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (ofNat(n) : PartENat) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 543 | 544 | theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_of_ne (hij : i ≠ j) (hj : j ∈ s) : (Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod, prod_eq_zero_iff]
exact ⟨j, ⟨mem_erase.mpr ⟨hij.symm, hj⟩, eval_basisDivisor_right⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).natDegree = #s - 1 := by
have H : ∀ j, j ∈ s.erase i → basisDivisor (v i) (v j) ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Ne, mem_erase, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact fun j ⟨hij₁, hj⟩ hij₂ => hij₁ (hvs hj hi hij₂.symm)
rw [← card_erase_of_mem hi, card_eq_sum_ones]
convert natDegree_prod _ _ H using 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => (natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne ?_).symm
rw [Ne, ← basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact H _ hj
theorem degree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).degree = ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree (basis_ne_zero hvs hi), natDegree_basis hvs hi]
theorem sum_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∑ j ∈ s, Lagrange.basis s v j = 1 := by
refine eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs (lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_) ?_ ?_
· rw [Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe #s)]
intro i hi
rw [degree_basis hvs hi, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.pred_lt (card_ne_zero_of_mem hi)
· rw [degree_one, ← WithBot.coe_zero, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nonempty.card_pos hs
· intro i hi
rw [eval_finset_sum, eval_one, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi, eval_basis_self hvs hi,
add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j hj => ?_
rcases mem_erase.mp hj with ⟨hij, _⟩
rw [eval_basis_of_ne hij hi]
theorem basisDivisor_add_symm {x y : F} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
basisDivisor x y + basisDivisor y x = 1 := by
classical
rw [← sum_basis Function.injective_id.injOn ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ {y}⟩,
sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.mpr hxy), sum_singleton, basis_pair_left hxy,
basis_pair_right hxy, id, id]
end Basis
section Interpolate
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s t : Finset ι} {i j : ι} {v : ι → F} (r r' : ι → F)
open Finset
/-- Lagrange interpolation: given a finset `s : Finset ι`, a nodal map `v : ι → F` injective on
`s` and a value function `r : ι → F`, `interpolate s v r` is the unique
polynomial of degree `< #s` that takes value `r i` on `v i` for all `i` in `s`. -/
@[simps]
def interpolate (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) : (ι → F) →ₗ[F] F[X] where
toFun r := ∑ i ∈ s, C (r i) * Lagrange.basis s v i
map_add' f g := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
have h : (fun x => C (f x) * Lagrange.basis s v x + C (g x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) =
(fun x => C ((f + g) x) * Lagrange.basis s v x) := by
simp_rw [← add_mul, ← C_add, Pi.add_apply]
rw [h]
map_smul' c f := by
simp_rw [Finset.smul_sum, C_mul', smul_smul, Pi.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem interpolate_empty : interpolate ∅ v r = 0 := by rw [interpolate_apply, sum_empty]
theorem interpolate_singleton : interpolate {i} v r = C (r i) := by
rw [interpolate_apply, sum_singleton, basis_singleton, mul_one]
theorem interpolate_one (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : interpolate s v 1 = 1 := by
simp_rw [interpolate_apply, Pi.one_apply, map_one, one_mul]
exact sum_basis hvs hs
theorem eval_interpolate_at_node (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
eval (v i) (interpolate s v r) = r i := by
rw [interpolate_apply, eval_finset_sum, ← add_sum_erase _ _ hi]
simp_rw [eval_mul, eval_C, eval_basis_self hvs hi, mul_one, add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basis_of_ne (mem_erase.mp H).1 hi, mul_zero]
theorem degree_interpolate_le (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(interpolate s v r).degree ≤ ↑(#s - 1) := by
refine (degree_sum_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro i hi
rw [degree_mul, degree_basis hvs hi]
by_cases hr : r i = 0
· simpa only [hr, map_zero, degree_zero, WithBot.bot_add] using bot_le
· rw [degree_C hr, zero_add]
theorem degree_interpolate_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : (interpolate s v r).degree < #s := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | h)
· rw [interpolate_empty, degree_zero, card_empty]
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
· refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_interpolate_le _ hvs) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
exact Nat.sub_lt (Nonempty.card_pos h) zero_lt_one
theorem degree_interpolate_erase_lt (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(interpolate (s.erase i) v r).degree < ↑(#s - 1) := by
rw [← Finset.card_erase_of_mem hi]
exact degree_interpolate_lt _ (Set.InjOn.mono (coe_subset.mpr (erase_subset _ _)) hvs)
theorem values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(hrr' : interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r') : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i := fun _ hi => by
rw [← eval_interpolate_at_node r hvs hi, hrr', eval_interpolate_at_node r' hvs hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on (hrr' : ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' :=
sum_congr rfl fun i hi => by rw [hrr' _ hi]
theorem interpolate_eq_iff_values_eq_on (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
interpolate s v r = interpolate s v r' ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, r i = r' i :=
⟨values_eq_on_of_interpolate_eq _ _ hvs, interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _⟩
theorem eq_interpolate {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) :
f = interpolate s v fun i => f.eval (v i) :=
eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs degree_f_lt (degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs) fun _ hi =>
(eval_interpolate_at_node (fun x ↦ eval (v x) f) hvs hi).symm
theorem eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = r i) : f = interpolate s v r := by
rw [eq_interpolate hvs degree_f_lt]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ eval_f
/-- This is the characteristic property of the interpolation: the interpolation is the
unique polynomial of `degree < Fintype.card ι` which takes the value of the `r i` on the `v i`.
-/
theorem eq_interpolate_iff {f : F[X]} (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) :
(f.degree < #s ∧ ∀ i ∈ s, eval (v i) f = r i) ↔ f = interpolate s v r := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq _ hvs h.1 h.2
· rw [h]
exact ⟨degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs, fun _ hi => eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi⟩
/-- Lagrange interpolation induces isomorphism between functions from `s`
and polynomials of degree less than `Fintype.card ι`. -/
def funEquivDegreeLT (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) : degreeLT F #s ≃ₗ[F] s → F where
toFun f i := f.1.eval (v i)
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ => eval_add
map_smul' c f := funext <| by simp
invFun r :=
⟨interpolate s v fun x => if hx : x ∈ s then r ⟨x, hx⟩ else 0,
mem_degreeLT.2 <| degree_interpolate_lt _ hvs⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, dite_eq_ite]
rw [mem_degreeLT] at hf
conv => rhs; rw [eq_interpolate hvs hf]
exact interpolate_eq_of_values_eq_on _ _ fun _ hi => if_pos hi
right_inv := by
intro f
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, eval_interpolate_at_node _ hvs hi]
exact dif_pos hi
theorem interpolate_eq_sum_interpolate_insert_sdiff (hvt : Set.InjOn v t) (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hst : s ⊆ t) :
interpolate t v r = ∑ i ∈ s, interpolate (insert i (t \ s)) v r * Lagrange.basis s v i := by
symm
refine eq_interpolate_of_eval_eq _ hvt (lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_) fun i hi => ?_
· simp_rw [Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe #t), degree_mul]
intro i hi
have hs : 1 ≤ #s := Nonempty.card_pos ⟨_, hi⟩
have hst' : #s ≤ #t := card_le_card hst
have H : #t = 1 + (#t - #s) + (#s - 1) := by
rw [add_assoc, tsub_add_tsub_cancel hst' hs, ← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (hs.trans hst'),
Nat.succ_add_sub_one, zero_add]
rw [degree_basis (Set.InjOn.mono hst hvt) hi, H, WithBot.coe_add, Nat.cast_withBot,
WithBot.add_lt_add_iff_right (@WithBot.coe_ne_bot _ (#s - 1))]
convert degree_interpolate_lt _
(hvt.mono (coe_subset.mpr (insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hst hi, sdiff_subset⟩)))
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right hi), card_sdiff hst, add_comm]
· simp_rw [eval_finset_sum, eval_mul]
by_cases hi' : i ∈ s
· rw [← add_sum_erase _ _ hi', eval_basis_self (hvt.mono hst) hi',
eval_interpolate_at_node _
(hvt.mono (coe_subset.mpr (insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hi, sdiff_subset⟩)))
(mem_insert_self _ _),
mul_one, add_eq_left]
refine sum_eq_zero fun j hj => ?_
rcases mem_erase.mp hj with ⟨hij, _⟩
rw [eval_basis_of_ne hij hi', mul_zero]
· have H : (∑ j ∈ s, eval (v i) (Lagrange.basis s v j)) = 1 := by
rw [← eval_finset_sum, sum_basis (hvt.mono hst) hs, eval_one]
rw [← mul_one (r i), ← H, mul_sum]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
congr
exact
eval_interpolate_at_node _ (hvt.mono (insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hst hj, sdiff_subset⟩))
(mem_insert.mpr (Or.inr (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hi, hi'⟩)))
theorem interpolate_eq_add_interpolate_erase (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(hij : i ≠ j) :
interpolate s v r =
interpolate (s.erase j) v r * basisDivisor (v i) (v j) +
interpolate (s.erase i) v r * basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [interpolate_eq_sum_interpolate_insert_sdiff _ hvs ⟨i, mem_insert_self i {j}⟩ _,
sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.mpr hij), sum_singleton, basis_pair_left hij,
basis_pair_right hij, sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem hi (not_mem_singleton.mpr hij),
sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, pair_comm,
sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem hj (not_mem_singleton.mpr hij.symm),
sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
exact insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hi, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hj⟩
end Interpolate
section Nodal
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*}
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → R}
open Finset Polynomial
/-- `nodal s v` is the unique monic polynomial whose roots are the nodes defined by `v` and `s`.
That is, the roots of `nodal s v` are exactly the image of `v` on `s`,
with appropriate multiplicity.
We can use `nodal` to define the barycentric forms of the evaluated interpolant.
-/
def nodal (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → R) : R[X] :=
∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (v i))
theorem nodal_eq (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → R) : nodal s v = ∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (v i)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nodal_empty : nodal ∅ v = 1 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_nodal [Nontrivial R] : (nodal s v).natDegree = #s := by
simp_rw [nodal, natDegree_prod_of_monic (h := fun i _ => monic_X_sub_C (v i)),
natDegree_X_sub_C, sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem nodal_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : nodal s v ≠ 0 := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | h)
· exact one_ne_zero
· apply ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt (n := 0)
simp only [natDegree_nodal, h.card_pos]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 480 | 491 | theorem degree_nodal [Nontrivial R] : (nodal s v).degree = #s := by | simp_rw [degree_eq_natDegree nodal_ne_zero, natDegree_nodal]
theorem nodal_monic : (nodal s v).Monic :=
monic_prod_of_monic s (fun i ↦ X - C (v i)) fun i _ ↦ monic_X_sub_C (v i)
theorem eval_nodal {x : R} : (nodal s v).eval x = ∏ i ∈ s, (x - v i) := by
simp_rw [nodal, eval_prod, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C]
theorem eval_nodal_at_node {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : eval (v i) (nodal s v) = 0 := by
rw [eval_nodal]
exact s.prod_eq_zero hi (sub_self (v i)) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.Measurable
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoundedVariation
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Distribution.AEEqOfIntegralContDiff
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Disintegration
/-!
# Rademacher's theorem: a Lipschitz function is differentiable almost everywhere
This file proves Rademacher's theorem: a Lipschitz function between finite-dimensional real vector
spaces is differentiable almost everywhere with respect to the Lebesgue measure. This is the content
of `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. Versions for functions which are Lipschitz on sets are also
given (see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`).
## Implementation
There are many proofs of Rademacher's theorem. We follow the one by Morrey, which is not the most
elementary but maybe the most elegant once necessary prerequisites are set up.
* Step 0: without loss of generality, one may assume that `f` is real-valued.
* Step 1: Since a one-dimensional Lipschitz function has bounded variation, it is differentiable
almost everywhere. With a Fubini argument, it follows that given any vector `v` then `f` is ae
differentiable in the direction of `v`. See `LipschitzWith.ae_lineDifferentiableAt`.
* Step 2: the line derivative `LineDeriv ℝ f x v` is ae linear in `v`. Morrey proves this by a
duality argument, integrating against a smooth compactly supported function `g`, passing the
derivative to `g` by integration by parts, and using the linearity of the derivative of `g`.
See `LipschitzWith.ae_lineDeriv_sum_eq`.
* Step 3: consider a countable dense set `s` of directions. Almost everywhere, the function `f`
is line-differentiable in all these directions and the line derivative is linear. Approximating
any direction by a direction in `s` and using the fact that `f` is Lipschitz to control the error,
it follows that `f` is Fréchet-differentiable at these points.
See `LipschitzWith.hasFDerivAt_of_hasLineDerivAt_of_closure`.
## References
* [Pertti Mattila, Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces, Theorem 7.3][Federer1996]
-/
open Filter MeasureTheory Measure Module Metric Set Asymptotics
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {C D : ℝ≥0} {f g : E → ℝ} {s : Set E}
{μ : Measure E}
namespace LipschitzWith
/-!
### Step 1: A Lipschitz function is ae differentiable in any given direction
This follows from the one-dimensional result that a Lipschitz function on `ℝ` has bounded
variation, and is therefore ae differentiable, together with a Fubini argument.
-/
theorem memLp_lineDeriv (hf : LipschitzWith C f) (v : E) :
MemLp (fun x ↦ lineDeriv ℝ f x v) ∞ μ :=
memLp_top_of_bound (aestronglyMeasurable_lineDeriv hf.continuous μ)
(C * ‖v‖) (.of_forall fun _x ↦ norm_lineDeriv_le_of_lipschitz ℝ hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_lineDeriv := memLp_lineDeriv
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem ae_lineDifferentiableAt
(hf : LipschitzWith C f) (v : E) :
∀ᵐ p ∂μ, LineDifferentiableAt ℝ f p v := by
let L : ℝ →L[ℝ] E := ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℝ) v
suffices A : ∀ p, ∀ᵐ (t : ℝ) ∂volume, LineDifferentiableAt ℝ f (p + t • v) v from
ae_mem_of_ae_add_linearMap_mem L.toLinearMap volume μ
(measurableSet_lineDifferentiableAt hf.continuous) A
intro p
have : ∀ᵐ (s : ℝ), DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun t ↦ f (p + t • v)) s :=
(hf.comp ((LipschitzWith.const p).add L.lipschitz)).ae_differentiableAt_real
filter_upwards [this] with s hs
have h's : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun t ↦ f (p + t • v)) (s + 0) := by simpa using hs
have : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun t ↦ s + t) 0 := differentiableAt_id.const_add _
simp only [LineDifferentiableAt]
convert h's.comp 0 this with _ t
simp only [LineDifferentiableAt, add_assoc, Function.comp_apply, add_smul]
theorem locallyIntegrable_lineDeriv (hf : LipschitzWith C f) (v : E) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x ↦ lineDeriv ℝ f x v) μ :=
(hf.memLp_lineDeriv v).locallyIntegrable le_top
/-!
### Step 2: the ae line derivative is linear
Surprisingly, this is the hardest step. We prove it using an elegant but slightly sophisticated
argument by Morrey, with a distributional flavor: we integrate against a smooth function, and push
the derivative to the smooth function by integration by parts. As the derivative of a smooth
function is linear, this gives the result.
-/
theorem integral_inv_smul_sub_mul_tendsto_integral_lineDeriv_mul
(hf : LipschitzWith C f) (hg : Integrable g μ) (v : E) :
Tendsto (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ∫ x, (t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) * g x ∂μ) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ f x v * g x ∂μ)) := by
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x ↦ (C * ‖v‖) * ‖g x‖)
· filter_upwards with t
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.mul ?_ hg.aestronglyMeasurable
apply aestronglyMeasurable_const.smul
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.sub _ hf.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable
apply AEMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
exact hf.continuous.measurable.comp_aemeasurable' (aemeasurable_id'.add_const _)
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with t (ht : 0 < t)
filter_upwards with x
calc ‖t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x) * g x‖
= (t⁻¹ * ‖f (x + t • v) - f x‖) * ‖g x‖ := by simp [norm_mul, ht.le]
_ ≤ (t⁻¹ * (C * ‖(x + t • v) - x‖)) * ‖g x‖ := by
gcongr; exact LipschitzWith.norm_sub_le hf (x + t • v) x
_ = (C * ‖v‖) *‖g x‖ := by field_simp [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg ht.le]; ring
· exact hg.norm.const_mul _
· filter_upwards [hf.ae_lineDifferentiableAt v] with x hx
exact hx.hasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_right.mul tendsto_const_nhds
theorem integral_inv_smul_sub_mul_tendsto_integral_lineDeriv_mul'
(hf : LipschitzWith C f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) (hg : Continuous g) (v : E) :
Tendsto (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ∫ x, (t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) * g x ∂μ) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ f x v * g x ∂μ)) := by
let K := cthickening (‖v‖) (tsupport f)
have K_compact : IsCompact K := IsCompact.cthickening h'f
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
(K.indicator (fun x ↦ (C * ‖v‖) * ‖g x‖))
· filter_upwards with t
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.mul ?_ hg.aestronglyMeasurable
apply aestronglyMeasurable_const.smul
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.sub _ hf.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable
apply AEMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
exact hf.continuous.measurable.comp_aemeasurable' (aemeasurable_id'.add_const _)
· filter_upwards [Ioc_mem_nhdsGT zero_lt_one] with t ht
have t_pos : 0 < t := ht.1
filter_upwards with x
by_cases hx : x ∈ K
· calc ‖t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x) * g x‖
= (t⁻¹ * ‖f (x + t • v) - f x‖) * ‖g x‖ := by simp [norm_mul, t_pos.le]
_ ≤ (t⁻¹ * (C * ‖(x + t • v) - x‖)) * ‖g x‖ := by
gcongr; exact LipschitzWith.norm_sub_le hf (x + t • v) x
_ = (C * ‖v‖) *‖g x‖ := by field_simp [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg t_pos.le]; ring
_ = K.indicator (fun x ↦ (C * ‖v‖) * ‖g x‖) x := by rw [indicator_of_mem hx]
· have A : f x = 0 := by
rw [← Function.nmem_support]
contrapose! hx
exact self_subset_cthickening _ (subset_tsupport _ hx)
have B : f (x + t • v) = 0 := by
rw [← Function.nmem_support]
contrapose! hx
apply mem_cthickening_of_dist_le _ _ (‖v‖) (tsupport f) (subset_tsupport _ hx)
simp only [dist_eq_norm, sub_add_cancel_left, norm_neg, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg t_pos.le, norm_pos_iff]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_left (norm_nonneg v) ht.2
simp only [B, A, _root_.sub_self, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, zero_mul, norm_zero]
exact indicator_nonneg (fun y _hy ↦ by positivity) _
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff K_compact.measurableSet]
apply ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact K_compact
exact (Continuous.mul continuous_const hg.norm).continuousOn
· filter_upwards [hf.ae_lineDifferentiableAt v] with x hx
exact hx.hasLineDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_right.mul tendsto_const_nhds
/-- Integration by parts formula for the line derivative of Lipschitz functions, assuming one of
them is compactly supported. -/
theorem integral_lineDeriv_mul_eq
(hf : LipschitzWith C f) (hg : LipschitzWith D g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) (v : E) :
∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ f x v * g x ∂μ = ∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ g x (-v) * f x ∂μ := by
/- Write down the line derivative as the limit of `(f (x + t v) - f x) / t` and
`(g (x - t v) - g x) / t`, and therefore the integrals as limits of the corresponding integrals
thanks to the dominated convergence theorem. At fixed positive `t`, the integrals coincide
(with the change of variables `y = x + t v`), so the limits also coincide. -/
have A : Tendsto (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ∫ x, (t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) * g x ∂μ) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ f x v * g x ∂μ)) :=
integral_inv_smul_sub_mul_tendsto_integral_lineDeriv_mul
hf (hg.continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h'g) v
have B : Tendsto (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ∫ x, (t⁻¹ • (g (x + t • (-v)) - g x)) * f x ∂μ) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ g x (-v) * f x ∂μ)) :=
integral_inv_smul_sub_mul_tendsto_integral_lineDeriv_mul' hg h'g hf.continuous (-v)
suffices S1 : ∀ (t : ℝ), ∫ x, (t⁻¹ • (f (x + t • v) - f x)) * g x ∂μ =
∫ x, (t⁻¹ • (g (x + t • (-v)) - g x)) * f x ∂μ by
simp only [S1] at A; exact tendsto_nhds_unique A B
intro t
suffices S2 : ∫ x, (f (x + t • v) - f x) * g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x * (g (x + t • (-v)) - g x) ∂μ by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc, integral_const_mul, S2, mul_neg, mul_comm (f _)]
have S3 : ∫ x, f (x + t • v) * g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x * g (x + t • (-v)) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_add_right_eq_self _ (t • (-v))]; simp
simp_rw [_root_.sub_mul, _root_.mul_sub]
rw [integral_sub, integral_sub, S3]
· apply Continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport
· exact hf.continuous.mul (hg.continuous.comp (continuous_add_right _))
· exact (h'g.comp_homeomorph (Homeomorph.addRight (t • (-v)))).mul_left
· exact (hf.continuous.mul hg.continuous).integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h'g.mul_left
· apply Continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport
· exact (hf.continuous.comp (continuous_add_right _)).mul hg.continuous
· exact h'g.mul_left
· exact (hf.continuous.mul hg.continuous).integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h'g.mul_left
/-- The line derivative of a Lipschitz function is almost everywhere linear with respect to fixed
coefficients. -/
theorem ae_lineDeriv_sum_eq
(hf : LipschitzWith C f) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (a : ι → ℝ) (v : ι → E) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, lineDeriv ℝ f x (∑ i ∈ s, a i • v i) = ∑ i ∈ s, a i • lineDeriv ℝ f x (v i) := by
/- Clever argument by Morrey: integrate against a smooth compactly supported function `g`, switch
the derivative to `g` by integration by parts, and use the linearity of the derivative of `g` to
conclude that the initial integrals coincide. -/
apply ae_eq_of_integral_contDiff_smul_eq (hf.locallyIntegrable_lineDeriv _)
(locallyIntegrable_finset_sum _ (fun i hi ↦ (hf.locallyIntegrable_lineDeriv (v i)).smul (a i)))
(fun g g_smooth g_comp ↦ ?_)
simp_rw [Finset.smul_sum]
have A : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (fun x ↦ g x • (a i • fun x ↦ lineDeriv ℝ f x (v i)) x) μ :=
fun i hi ↦ (g_smooth.continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport g_comp).smul_of_top_left
((hf.memLp_lineDeriv (v i)).const_smul (a i))
rw [integral_finset_sum _ A]
suffices S1 : ∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ f x (∑ i ∈ s, a i • v i) * g x ∂μ
= ∑ i ∈ s, a i * ∫ x, lineDeriv ℝ f x (v i) * g x ∂μ by
dsimp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (a _), mul_assoc, integral_const_mul, mul_comm (g _), S1]
suffices S2 : ∫ x, (∑ i ∈ s, a i * fderiv ℝ g x (v i)) * f x ∂μ =
∑ i ∈ s, a i * ∫ x, fderiv ℝ g x (v i) * f x ∂μ by
obtain ⟨D, g_lip⟩ : ∃ D, LipschitzWith D g :=
ContDiff.lipschitzWith_of_hasCompactSupport g_comp g_smooth (mod_cast le_top)
simp_rw [integral_lineDeriv_mul_eq hf g_lip g_comp]
simp_rw [(g_smooth.differentiable (mod_cast le_top)).differentiableAt.lineDeriv_eq_fderiv]
simp only [map_neg, _root_.map_sum, map_smul, smul_eq_mul, neg_mul]
simp only [integral_neg, mul_neg, Finset.sum_neg_distrib, neg_inj]
exact S2
suffices B : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (fun x ↦ a i * (fderiv ℝ g x (v i) * f x)) μ by
simp_rw [Finset.sum_mul, mul_assoc, integral_finset_sum s B, integral_const_mul]
intro i _hi
let L : (E →L[ℝ] ℝ) → ℝ := fun f ↦ f (v i)
change Integrable (fun x ↦ a i * ((L ∘ (fderiv ℝ g)) x * f x)) μ
refine (Continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport ?_ ?_).const_mul _
· exact ((g_smooth.continuous_fderiv (mod_cast le_top)).clm_apply continuous_const).mul
hf.continuous
· exact ((g_comp.fderiv ℝ).comp_left rfl).mul_right
/-!
### Step 3: construct the derivative using the line derivatives along a basis
-/
theorem ae_exists_fderiv_of_countable
(hf : LipschitzWith C f) {s : Set E} (hs : s.Countable) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ (L : E →L[ℝ] ℝ), ∀ v ∈ s, HasLineDerivAt ℝ f (L v) x v := by
have B := Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E
have I1 : ∀ᵐ (x : E) ∂μ, ∀ v ∈ s, lineDeriv ℝ f x (∑ i, (B.repr v i) • B i) =
∑ i, B.repr v i • lineDeriv ℝ f x (B i) :=
(ae_ball_iff hs).2 (fun v _ ↦ hf.ae_lineDeriv_sum_eq _ _ _)
have I2 : ∀ᵐ (x : E) ∂μ, ∀ v ∈ s, LineDifferentiableAt ℝ f x v :=
(ae_ball_iff hs).2 (fun v _ ↦ hf.ae_lineDifferentiableAt v)
filter_upwards [I1, I2] with x hx h'x
let L : E →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (B.constr ℝ (fun i ↦ lineDeriv ℝ f x (B i)))
refine ⟨L, fun v hv ↦ ?_⟩
have J : L v = lineDeriv ℝ f x v := by convert (hx v hv).symm <;> simp [L, B.sum_repr v]
simpa [J] using (h'x v hv).hasLineDerivAt
omit [MeasurableSpace E] in
/-- If a Lipschitz functions has line derivatives in a dense set of directions, all of them given by
a single continuous linear map `L`, then it admits `L` as Fréchet derivative. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_of_hasLineDerivAt_of_closure
{f : E → F} (hf : LipschitzWith C f) {s : Set E} (hs : sphere 0 1 ⊆ closure s)
{L : E →L[ℝ] F} {x : E} (hL : ∀ v ∈ s, HasLineDerivAt ℝ f (L v) x v) :
HasFDerivAt f L x := by
rw [hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, isLittleO_iff]
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ (C + ‖L‖ + 1) * δ = ε :=
⟨ε / (C + ‖L‖ + 1), by positivity, mul_div_cancel₀ ε (by positivity)⟩
obtain ⟨q, hqs, q_fin, hq⟩ : ∃ q, q ⊆ s ∧ q.Finite ∧ sphere 0 1 ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ q, ball y δ := by
have : sphere 0 1 ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ s, ball y δ := by
apply hs.trans (fun z hz ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, dist z y < δ := Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 hz δ δpos
exact mem_biUnion ys hy
exact (isCompact_sphere 0 1).elim_finite_subcover_image (fun y _hy ↦ isOpen_ball) this
have I : ∀ᶠ t in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), ∀ v ∈ q, ‖f (x + t • v) - f x - t • L v‖ ≤ δ * ‖t‖ := by
apply (Finite.eventually_all q_fin).2 (fun v hv ↦ ?_)
apply Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def ?_ δpos
exact hasLineDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero.1 (hL v (hqs hv))
obtain ⟨r, r_pos, hr⟩ : ∃ (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ ∀ (t : ℝ), ‖t‖ < r →
∀ v ∈ q, ‖f (x + t • v) - f x - t • L v‖ ≤ δ * ‖t‖ := by
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 I with ⟨r, r_pos, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, r_pos, fun t ht v hv ↦ hr (mem_ball_zero_iff.2 ht) v hv⟩
apply Metric.mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨r, r_pos, fun v hv ↦ ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne v 0 with rfl|v_ne
· simp
obtain ⟨w, ρ, w_mem, hvw, hρ⟩ : ∃ w ρ, w ∈ sphere 0 1 ∧ v = ρ • w ∧ ρ = ‖v‖ := by
refine ⟨‖v‖⁻¹ • v, ‖v‖, by simp [norm_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 v_ne)], ?_, rfl⟩
simp [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 v_ne)]
have norm_rho : ‖ρ‖ = ρ := by rw [hρ, norm_norm]
have rho_pos : 0 ≤ ρ := by simp [hρ]
obtain ⟨y, yq, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ q, ‖w - y‖ < δ := by simpa [← dist_eq_norm] using hq w_mem
have : ‖y - w‖ < δ := by rwa [norm_sub_rev]
calc ‖f (x + v) - f x - L v‖
= ‖f (x + ρ • w) - f x - ρ • L w‖ := by simp [hvw]
_ = ‖(f (x + ρ • w) - f (x + ρ • y)) + (ρ • L y - ρ • L w)
+ (f (x + ρ • y) - f x - ρ • L y)‖ := by congr; abel
_ ≤ ‖f (x + ρ • w) - f (x + ρ • y)‖ + ‖ρ • L y - ρ • L w‖
+ ‖f (x + ρ • y) - f x - ρ • L y‖ := norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ C * ‖(x + ρ • w) - (x + ρ • y)‖ + ρ * (‖L‖ * ‖y - w‖) + δ * ρ := by
gcongr
· exact hf.norm_sub_le _ _
· rw [← smul_sub, norm_smul, norm_rho]
gcongr
exact L.lipschitz.norm_sub_le _ _
· conv_rhs => rw [← norm_rho]
apply hr _ _ _ yq
simpa [norm_rho, hρ] using hv
_ ≤ C * (ρ * δ) + ρ * (‖L‖ * δ) + δ * ρ := by
simp only [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, ← smul_sub, norm_smul, norm_rho]; gcongr
_ = ((C + ‖L‖ + 1) * δ) * ρ := by ring
_ = ε * ‖v‖ := by rw [hδ, hρ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-15")]
alias hasFderivAt_of_hasLineDerivAt_of_closure := hasFDerivAt_of_hasLineDerivAt_of_closure
/-- A real-valued function on a finite-dimensional space which is Lipschitz is
differentiable almost everywere. Superseded by
`LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt` which works for functions taking value in any
finite-dimensional space. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt_of_real (hf : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense⟩ : ∃ (s : Set E), s.Countable ∧ Dense s :=
TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense E
have hs : sphere 0 1 ⊆ closure s := by rw [s_dense.closure_eq]; exact subset_univ _
filter_upwards [hf.ae_exists_fderiv_of_countable s_count]
rintro x ⟨L, hL⟩
exact (hf.hasFDerivAt_of_hasLineDerivAt_of_closure hs hL).differentiableAt
end LipschitzWith
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ F] [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
namespace LipschitzOnWith
/-- A real-valued function on a finite-dimensional space which is Lipschitz on a set is
differentiable almost everywere in this set. Superseded by
`LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem` which works for functions taking value in any
finite-dimensional space. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_of_real (hf : LipschitzOnWith C f s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨g, g_lip, hg⟩ : ∃ (g : E → ℝ), LipschitzWith C g ∧ EqOn f g s := hf.extend_real
filter_upwards [g_lip.ae_differentiableAt_of_real] with x hx xs
exact hx.differentiableWithinAt.congr hg (hg xs)
/-- A function on a finite-dimensional space which is Lipschitz on a set and taking values in a
product space is differentiable almost everywere in this set. Superseded by
`LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem` which works for functions taking value in any
finite-dimensional space. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Rademacher.lean | 354 | 364 | theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
{ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : E → ι → ℝ} {s : Set E}
(hf : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by | have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 (fun x : ι → ℝ ↦ x i) := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : E ↦ f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_of_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_lipschitzOnWith (A i) hf
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 (fun i ↦ hx i xs)
/-- *Rademacher's theorem*: a function between finite-dimensional real vector spaces which is |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
/-!
# Cardinality of finite types
The cardinality of a finite type `α` is given by `Nat.card α`. This function has
the "junk value" of `0` for infinite types, but to ensure the function has valid
output, one just needs to know that it's possible to produce a `Finite` instance
for the type. (Note: we could have defined a `Finite.card` that required you to
supply a `Finite` instance, but (a) the function would be `noncomputable` anyway
so there is no need to supply the instance and (b) the function would have a more
complicated dependent type that easily leads to "motive not type correct" errors.)
## Implementation notes
Theorems about `Nat.card` are sometimes incidentally true for both finite and infinite
types. If removing a finiteness constraint results in no loss in legibility, we remove
it. We generally put such theorems into the `SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite` module.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- There is (noncomputably) an equivalence between a finite type `α` and `Fin (Nat.card α)`. -/
def Finite.equivFin (α : Type*) [Finite α] : α ≃ Fin (Nat.card α) := by
have := (Finite.exists_equiv_fin α).choose_spec.some
rwa [Nat.card_eq_of_equiv_fin this]
/-- Similar to `Finite.equivFin` but with control over the term used for the cardinality. -/
def Finite.equivFinOfCardEq [Finite α] {n : ℕ} (h : Nat.card α = n) : α ≃ Fin n := by
subst h
apply Finite.equivFin
open scoped Classical in
theorem Nat.card_eq (α : Type*) :
Nat.card α = if _ : Finite α then @Fintype.card α (Fintype.ofFinite α) else 0 := by
cases finite_or_infinite α
· letI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [this, *, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, dif_pos]
· simp only [*, card_eq_zero_of_infinite, not_finite_iff_infinite.mpr, dite_false]
theorem Finite.card_pos_iff [Finite α] : 0 < Nat.card α ↔ Nonempty α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
theorem Finite.card_pos [Finite α] [h : Nonempty α] : 0 < Nat.card α :=
Finite.card_pos_iff.mpr h
namespace Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias cast_card_eq_mk := Nat.cast_card
theorem card_eq [Finite α] [Finite β] : Nat.card α = Nat.card β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite β
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_eq]
theorem card_le_one_iff_subsingleton [Finite α] : Nat.card α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial [Finite α] : 1 < Nat.card α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial]
theorem one_lt_card [Finite α] [h : Nontrivial α] : 1 < Nat.card α :=
one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem card_option [Finite α] : Nat.card (Option α) = Nat.card α + 1 := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_option]
theorem card_le_of_injective [Finite β] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite β
haveI := Fintype.ofInjective f hf
simpa only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] using Fintype.card_le_of_injective f hf
theorem card_le_of_embedding [Finite β] (f : α ↪ β) : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β :=
card_le_of_injective _ f.injective
| Mathlib/Data/Finite/Card.lean | 93 | 95 | theorem card_le_of_surjective [Finite α] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α := by | classical |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Complex
/-!
# Cyclotomic polynomials.
For `n : ℕ` and an integral domain `R`, we define a modified version of the `n`-th cyclotomic
polynomial with coefficients in `R`, denoted `cyclotomic' n R`, as `∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ` varies
over the primitive `n`th roots of unity. If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R` then
this the standard definition. We then define the standard cyclotomic polynomial `cyclotomic n R`
with coefficients in any ring `R`.
## Main definition
* `cyclotomic n R` : the `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_cyclotomic` : The degree of `cyclotomic n` is `totient n`.
* `Polynomial.prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one` : `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (cyclotomic i)`, where `i`
divides `n`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_prod_X_pow_sub_one_pow_moebius` : The Möbius inversion formula for
`cyclotomic n R` over an abstract fraction field for `R[X]`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `cyclotomic' n R` makes sense in any integral domain `R`, but the interesting
results hold if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. In particular, our definition is
not the standard one unless there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`. For example,
`cyclotomic' 3 ℤ = 1`, since there are no primitive cube roots of unity in `ℤ`. The main example is
`R = ℂ`, we decided to work in general since the difficulties are essentially the same.
To get the standard cyclotomic polynomials, we use `unique_int_coeff_of_cycl`, with `R = ℂ`,
to get a polynomial with integer coefficients and then we map it to `R[X]`, for any ring `R`.
-/
open scoped Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace Polynomial
section Cyclotomic'
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
/-- The modified `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`, it is the usual cyclotomic
polynomial if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. -/
def cyclotomic' (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : R[X] :=
∏ μ ∈ primitiveRoots n R, (X - C μ)
/-- The zeroth modified cyclotomic polyomial is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_zero (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 0 R = 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_empty, primitiveRoots_zero]
/-- The first modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_one (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 1 R = X - 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_one,
IsPrimitiveRoot.primitiveRoots_one]
/-- The second modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X + 1` if the characteristic of `R` is not `2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_two (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p : ℕ) [CharP R p] (hp : p ≠ 2) :
cyclotomic' 2 R = X + 1 := by
rw [cyclotomic']
have prim_root_two : primitiveRoots 2 R = {(-1 : R)} := by
simp only [Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_primitiveRoots two_pos]
exact ⟨IsPrimitiveRoot.neg_one p hp, fun x => IsPrimitiveRoot.eq_neg_one_of_two_right⟩
simp only [prim_root_two, Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_neg, RingHom.map_one, sub_neg_eq_add]
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is monic. -/
theorem cyclotomic'.monic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).Monic :=
monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun _ _ => monic_X_sub_C _
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is different from `0`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' n R ≠ 0 :=
(cyclotomic'.monic n R).ne_zero
/-- The natural degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of
unity in `R`. -/
theorem natDegree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).natDegree = Nat.totient n := by
rw [cyclotomic']
rw [natDegree_prod (primitiveRoots n R) fun z : R => X - C z]
· simp only [IsPrimitiveRoot.card_primitiveRoots h, mul_one, natDegree_X_sub_C, Nat.cast_id,
Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
intro z _
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero z
/-- The degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of unity in `R`. -/
theorem degree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).degree = Nat.totient n := by
simp only [degree_eq_natDegree (cyclotomic'_ne_zero n R), natDegree_cyclotomic' h]
/-- The roots of `cyclotomic' n R` are the primitive `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem roots_of_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).roots = (primitiveRoots n R).val := by
rw [cyclotomic']; exact roots_prod_X_sub_C (primitiveRoots n R)
/-- If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ`
varies over the `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
X ^ n - 1 = ∏ ζ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R), (X - C ζ) := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset, ← Multiset.toFinset_eq (IsPrimitiveRoot.nthRoots_one_nodup h)]
simp only [Finset.prod_mk, RingHom.map_one]
rw [nthRoots]
have hmonic : (X ^ n - C (1 : R)).Monic := monic_X_pow_sub_C (1 : R) (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
symm
apply prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq hmonic
rw [@natDegree_X_pow_sub_C R _ _ n 1, ← nthRoots]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- `cyclotomic' n K` splits. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_splits (n : ℕ) : Splits (RingHom.id K) (cyclotomic' n K) := by
apply splits_prod (RingHom.id K)
intro z _
simp only [splits_X_sub_C (RingHom.id K)]
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1` splits. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_splits {ζ : K} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
Splits (RingHom.id K) (X ^ n - C (1 : K)) := by
rw [splits_iff_card_roots, ← nthRoots, IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then
`∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic' i K = X ^ n - 1`. -/
theorem prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic' i K = X ^ n - 1 := by
classical
have hd : (n.divisors : Set ℕ).PairwiseDisjoint fun k => primitiveRoots k K :=
fun x _ y _ hne => IsPrimitiveRoot.disjoint hne
simp only [X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod hpos h, cyclotomic', ← Finset.prod_biUnion hd,
IsPrimitiveRoot.nthRoots_one_eq_biUnion_primitiveRoots]
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then
`cyclotomic' n K = (X ^ k - 1) /ₘ (∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors k, cyclotomic' i K)`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one_div {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
cyclotomic' n K = (X ^ n - 1) /ₘ ∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors n, cyclotomic' i K := by
rw [← prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos h, ← Nat.cons_self_properDivisors hpos.ne',
Finset.prod_cons]
have prod_monic : (∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors n, cyclotomic' i K).Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic
intro i _
exact cyclotomic'.monic i K
rw [(div_modByMonic_unique (cyclotomic' n K) 0 prod_monic _).1]
simp only [degree_zero, zero_add]
refine ⟨by rw [mul_comm], ?_⟩
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
intro h
exact Monic.ne_zero prod_monic (degree_eq_bot.1 h)
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `cyclotomic' n K` comes from a
monic polynomial with integer coefficients. -/
theorem int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) : ∃ P : ℤ[X], map (Int.castRingHom K) P =
cyclotomic' n K ∧ P.degree = (cyclotomic' n K).degree ∧ P.Monic := by
refine lifts_and_degree_eq_and_monic ?_ (cyclotomic'.monic n K)
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with k ihk generalizing ζ
rcases k.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· use 1
simp only [cyclotomic'_zero, coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_one]
let B : K[X] := ∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors k, cyclotomic' i K
have Bmo : B.Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic
intro i _
exact cyclotomic'.monic i K
have Bint : B ∈ lifts (Int.castRingHom K) := by
refine Subsemiring.prod_mem (lifts (Int.castRingHom K)) ?_
intro x hx
have xsmall := (Nat.mem_properDivisors.1 hx).2
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := (Nat.mem_properDivisors.1 hx).1
rw [mul_comm] at hd
exact ihk x xsmall (h.pow hpos hd)
replace Bint := lifts_and_degree_eq_and_monic Bint Bmo
obtain ⟨B₁, hB₁, _, hB₁mo⟩ := Bint
let Q₁ : ℤ[X] := (X ^ k - 1) /ₘ B₁
have huniq : 0 + B * cyclotomic' k K = X ^ k - 1 ∧ (0 : K[X]).degree < B.degree := by
constructor
· rw [zero_add, mul_comm, ← prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos h, ←
Nat.cons_self_properDivisors hpos.ne', Finset.prod_cons]
· simpa only [degree_zero, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot] using Bmo.ne_zero
replace huniq := div_modByMonic_unique (cyclotomic' k K) (0 : K[X]) Bmo huniq
simp only [lifts, RingHom.mem_rangeS]
use Q₁
rw [coe_mapRingHom, map_divByMonic (Int.castRingHom K) hB₁mo, hB₁, ← huniq.1]
simp
/-- If `K` is of characteristic `0` and there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`,
then `cyclotomic n K` comes from a unique polynomial with integer coefficients. -/
theorem unique_int_coeff_of_cycl {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CharZero K] {ζ : K}
{n : ℕ+} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
∃! P : ℤ[X], map (Int.castRingHom K) P = cyclotomic' n K := by
obtain ⟨P, hP⟩ := int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' h
refine ⟨P, hP.1, fun Q hQ => ?_⟩
apply map_injective (Int.castRingHom K) Int.cast_injective
rw [hP.1, hQ]
end Field
end Cyclotomic'
section Cyclotomic
/-- The `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`. -/
def cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] : R[X] :=
if h : n = 0 then 1
else map (Int.castRingHom R) (int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n h)).choose
theorem int_cyclotomic_rw {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
cyclotomic n ℤ = (int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n h)).choose := by
simp only [cyclotomic, h, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
ext i
simp only [coeff_map, Int.cast_id, eq_intCast]
/-- `cyclotomic n R` comes from `cyclotomic n ℤ`. -/
theorem map_cyclotomic_int (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] :
map (Int.castRingHom R) (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic n R := by
by_cases hzero : n = 0
· simp only [hzero, cyclotomic, dif_pos, Polynomial.map_one]
simp [cyclotomic, hzero]
theorem int_cyclotomic_spec (n : ℕ) :
map (Int.castRingHom ℂ) (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic' n ℂ ∧
(cyclotomic n ℤ).degree = (cyclotomic' n ℂ).degree ∧ (cyclotomic n ℤ).Monic := by
by_cases hzero : n = 0
· simp only [hzero, cyclotomic, degree_one, monic_one, cyclotomic'_zero, dif_pos,
eq_self_iff_true, Polynomial.map_one, and_self_iff]
rw [int_cyclotomic_rw hzero]
exact (int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n hzero)).choose_spec
theorem int_cyclotomic_unique {n : ℕ} {P : ℤ[X]} (h : map (Int.castRingHom ℂ) P = cyclotomic' n ℂ) :
P = cyclotomic n ℤ := by
apply map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℂ) Int.cast_injective
rw [h, (int_cyclotomic_spec n).1]
/-- The definition of `cyclotomic n R` commutes with any ring homomorphism. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
map f (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic n S := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int n R, ← map_cyclotomic_int n S, map_map]
have : Subsingleton (ℤ →+* S) := inferInstance
congr!
theorem cyclotomic.eval_apply {R S : Type*} (q : R) (n : ℕ) [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
eval (f q) (cyclotomic n S) = f (eval q (cyclotomic n R)) := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic n f, eval_map, eval₂_at_apply]
@[simp] theorem cyclotomic.eval_apply_ofReal (q : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
eval (q : ℂ) (cyclotomic n ℂ) = (eval q (cyclotomic n ℝ)) :=
cyclotomic.eval_apply q n (algebraMap ℝ ℂ)
/-- The zeroth cyclotomic polyomial is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_zero (R : Type*) [Ring R] : cyclotomic 0 R = 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic, dif_pos]
/-- The first cyclotomic polyomial is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_one (R : Type*) [Ring R] : cyclotomic 1 R = X - 1 := by
have hspec : map (Int.castRingHom ℂ) (X - 1) = cyclotomic' 1 ℂ := by
simp only [cyclotomic'_one, PNat.one_coe, map_X, Polynomial.map_one, Polynomial.map_sub]
symm
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← int_cyclotomic_unique hspec]
simp only [map_X, Polynomial.map_one, Polynomial.map_sub]
/-- `cyclotomic n` is monic. -/
theorem cyclotomic.monic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] : (cyclotomic n R).Monic := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int]
exact (int_cyclotomic_spec n).2.2.map _
/-- `cyclotomic n` is primitive. -/
theorem cyclotomic.isPrimitive (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] : (cyclotomic n R).IsPrimitive :=
(cyclotomic.monic n R).isPrimitive
/-- `cyclotomic n R` is different from `0`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] : cyclotomic n R ≠ 0 :=
(cyclotomic.monic n R).ne_zero
/-- The degree of `cyclotomic n` is `totient n`. -/
theorem degree_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] :
(cyclotomic n R).degree = Nat.totient n := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int]
rw [degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (Int.castRingHom R) _]
· rcases n with - | k
· simp only [cyclotomic, degree_one, dif_pos, Nat.totient_zero, CharP.cast_eq_zero]
rw [← degree_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp k.succ (Nat.succ_ne_zero k))]
exact (int_cyclotomic_spec k.succ).2.1
simp only [(int_cyclotomic_spec n).right.right, eq_intCast, Monic.leadingCoeff, Int.cast_one,
Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero]
/-- The natural degree of `cyclotomic n` is `totient n`. -/
theorem natDegree_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] :
(cyclotomic n R).natDegree = Nat.totient n := by
rw [natDegree, degree_cyclotomic]; norm_cast
/-- The degree of `cyclotomic n R` is positive. -/
theorem degree_cyclotomic_pos (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) (hpos : 0 < n) [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] :
0 < (cyclotomic n R).degree := by
rwa [degree_cyclotomic n R, Nat.cast_pos, Nat.totient_pos]
open Finset
/-- `∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic i R = X ^ n - 1`. -/
theorem prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one {n : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < n) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] :
∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic i R = X ^ n - 1 := by
have integer : ∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic i ℤ = X ^ n - 1 := by
apply map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℂ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [Polynomial.map_prod, int_cyclotomic_spec, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X,
Polynomial.map_one, Polynomial.map_sub]
exact prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n hpos.ne')
simpa only [Polynomial.map_prod, map_cyclotomic_int, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_one,
Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_X] using congr_arg (map (Int.castRingHom R)) integer
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 336 | 345 | theorem cyclotomic.dvd_X_pow_sub_one (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] :
cyclotomic n R ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by | suffices cyclotomic n ℤ ∣ X ^ n - 1 by
simpa only [map_cyclotomic_int, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_one, Polynomial.map_pow,
Polynomial.map_X] using map_dvd (Int.castRingHom R) this
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [← prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one hn]
exact Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ (n.mem_divisors_self hn.ne') |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 356 | 364 | theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by | simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sean Leather. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.AList
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Finite maps over `Multiset`
-/
universe u v w
open List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### Multisets of sigma types -/
namespace Multiset
/-- Multiset of keys of an association multiset. -/
def keys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Multiset α :=
s.map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem coe_keys {l : List (Sigma β)} : keys (l : Multiset (Sigma β)) = (l.keys : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_zero : keys (0 : Multiset (Sigma β)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Multiset (Sigma β)} :
keys (⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ keys s := by
simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton {a : α} {b : β a} : keys ({⟨a, b⟩} : Multiset (Sigma β)) = {a} := rfl
/-- `NodupKeys s` means that `s` has no duplicate keys. -/
def NodupKeys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.NodupKeys fun _ _ p => propext <| perm_nodupKeys p
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodupKeys {l : List (Sigma β)} : @NodupKeys α β l ↔ l.NodupKeys :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nodup_keys {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} : m.keys.Nodup ↔ m.NodupKeys := by
rcases m with ⟨l⟩; rfl
alias ⟨_, NodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩ := nodup_keys
protected lemma NodupKeys.nodup {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} (h : m.NodupKeys) : m.Nodup :=
h.nodup_keys.of_map _
end Multiset
/-! ### Finmap -/
/-- `Finmap β` is the type of finite maps over a multiset. It is effectively
a quotient of `AList β` by permutation of the underlying list. -/
structure Finmap (β : α → Type v) : Type max u v where
/-- The underlying `Multiset` of a `Finmap` -/
entries : Multiset (Sigma β)
/-- There are no duplicate keys in `entries` -/
nodupKeys : entries.NodupKeys
/-- The quotient map from `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def AList.toFinmap (s : AList β) : Finmap β :=
⟨s.entries, s.nodupKeys⟩
local notation:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => AList.toFinmap a
theorem AList.toFinmap_eq {s₁ s₂ : AList β} :
toFinmap s₁ = toFinmap s₂ ↔ s₁.entries ~ s₂.entries := by
cases s₁
cases s₂
simp [AList.toFinmap]
@[simp]
theorem AList.toFinmap_entries (s : AList β) : ⟦s⟧.entries = s.entries :=
rfl
/-- Given `l : List (Sigma β)`, create a term of type `Finmap β` by removing
entries with duplicate keys. -/
def List.toFinmap [DecidableEq α] (s : List (Sigma β)) : Finmap β :=
s.toAList.toFinmap
namespace Finmap
open AList
lemma nodup_entries (f : Finmap β) : f.entries.Nodup := f.nodupKeys.nodup
/-! ### Lifting from AList -/
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def liftOn {γ} (s : Finmap β) (f : AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a b : AList β, a.entries ~ b.entries → f a = f b) : γ := by
refine
(Quotient.liftOn s.entries
(fun (l : List (Sigma β)) => (⟨_, fun nd => f ⟨l, nd⟩⟩ : Part γ))
(fun l₁ l₂ p => Part.ext' (perm_nodupKeys p) ?_) : Part γ).get ?_
· exact fun h1 h2 => H _ _ p
· have := s.nodupKeys
revert this
rcases s.entries with ⟨l⟩
exact id
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_toFinmap {γ} (s : AList β) (f : AList β → γ) (H) : liftOn ⟦s⟧ f H = f s := by
cases s
rfl
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on 2 `AList`s to 2 `Finmap`s. -/
def liftOn₂ {γ} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : AList β,
a₁.entries ~ a₂.entries → b₁.entries ~ b₂.entries → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : γ :=
liftOn s₁ (fun l₁ => liftOn s₂ (f l₁) fun _ _ p => H _ _ _ _ (Perm.refl _) p) fun a₁ a₂ p => by
have H' : f a₁ = f a₂ := funext fun _ => H _ _ _ _ p (Perm.refl _)
simp only [H']
@[simp]
theorem liftOn₂_toFinmap {γ} (s₁ s₂ : AList β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ) (H) :
liftOn₂ ⟦s₁⟧ ⟦s₂⟧ f H = f s₁ s₂ := by
cases s₁; cases s₂; rfl
/-! ### Induction -/
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/Data/Finmap.lean | 134 | 136 | theorem induction_on {C : Finmap β → Prop} (s : Finmap β) (H : ∀ a : AList β, C ⟦a⟧) : C s := by | rcases s with ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩; exact H ⟨a, h⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Functor
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Functors with two arguments
This file defines bifunctors.
A bifunctor is a function `F : Type* → Type* → Type*` along with a bimap which turns `F α β`into
`F α' β'` given two functions `α → α'` and `β → β'`. It further
* respects the identity: `bimap id id = id`
* composes in the obvious way: `(bimap f' g') ∘ (bimap f g) = bimap (f' ∘ f) (g' ∘ g)`
## Main declarations
* `Bifunctor`: A typeclass for the bare bimap of a bifunctor.
* `LawfulBifunctor`: A typeclass asserting this bimap respects the bifunctor laws.
-/
universe u₀ u₁ u₂ v₀ v₁ v₂
open Function
/-- Lawless bifunctor. This typeclass only holds the data for the bimap. -/
class Bifunctor (F : Type u₀ → Type u₁ → Type u₂) where
bimap : ∀ {α α' β β'}, (α → α') → (β → β') → F α β → F α' β'
export Bifunctor (bimap)
/-- Bifunctor. This typeclass asserts that a lawless `Bifunctor` is lawful. -/
class LawfulBifunctor (F : Type u₀ → Type u₁ → Type u₂) [Bifunctor F] : Prop where
id_bimap : ∀ {α β} (x : F α β), bimap id id x = x
bimap_bimap :
∀ {α₀ α₁ α₂ β₀ β₁ β₂} (f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : α₁ → α₂) (g : β₀ → β₁) (g' : β₁ → β₂) (x : F α₀ β₀),
bimap f' g' (bimap f g x) = bimap (f' ∘ f) (g' ∘ g) x
export LawfulBifunctor (id_bimap bimap_bimap)
attribute [higher_order bimap_id_id] id_bimap
attribute [higher_order bimap_comp_bimap] bimap_bimap
export LawfulBifunctor (bimap_id_id bimap_comp_bimap)
variable {F : Type u₀ → Type u₁ → Type u₂} [Bifunctor F]
namespace Bifunctor
/-- Left map of a bifunctor. -/
abbrev fst {α α' β} (f : α → α') : F α β → F α' β :=
bimap f id
/-- Right map of a bifunctor. -/
abbrev snd {α β β'} (f : β → β') : F α β → F α β' :=
bimap id f
variable [LawfulBifunctor F]
@[higher_order fst_id]
theorem id_fst : ∀ {α β} (x : F α β), fst id x = x :=
@id_bimap _ _ _
@[higher_order snd_id]
theorem id_snd : ∀ {α β} (x : F α β), snd id x = x :=
@id_bimap _ _ _
@[higher_order fst_comp_fst]
theorem comp_fst {α₀ α₁ α₂ β} (f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : α₁ → α₂) (x : F α₀ β) :
fst f' (fst f x) = fst (f' ∘ f) x := by simp [fst, bimap_bimap]
@[higher_order fst_comp_snd]
theorem fst_snd {α₀ α₁ β₀ β₁} (f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : β₀ → β₁) (x : F α₀ β₀) :
fst f (snd f' x) = bimap f f' x := by simp [fst, bimap_bimap]
@[higher_order snd_comp_fst]
theorem snd_fst {α₀ α₁ β₀ β₁} (f : α₀ → α₁) (f' : β₀ → β₁) (x : F α₀ β₀) :
snd f' (fst f x) = bimap f f' x := by simp [snd, bimap_bimap]
@[higher_order snd_comp_snd]
| Mathlib/Control/Bifunctor.lean | 86 | 87 | theorem comp_snd {α β₀ β₁ β₂} (g : β₀ → β₁) (g' : β₁ → β₂) (x : F α β₀) :
snd g' (snd g x) = snd (g' ∘ g) x := by | simp [snd, bimap_bimap] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Geißer, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.DiophantineApproximation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
/-!
# Pell's Equation
*Pell's Equation* is the equation $x^2 - d y^2 = 1$, where $d$ is a positive integer
that is not a square, and one is interested in solutions in integers $x$ and $y$.
In this file, we aim at providing all of the essential theory of Pell's Equation for general $d$
(as opposed to the contents of `NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic`, which is specific to the case
$d = a^2 - 1$ for some $a > 1$).
We begin by defining a type `Pell.Solution₁ d` for solutions of the equation,
show that it has a natural structure as an abelian group, and prove some basic
properties.
We then prove the following
**Theorem.** Let $d$ be a positive integer that is not a square. Then the equation
$x^2 - d y^2 = 1$ has a nontrivial (i.e., with $y \ne 0$) solution in integers.
See `Pell.exists_of_not_isSquare` and `Pell.Solution₁.exists_nontrivial_of_not_isSquare`.
We then define the *fundamental solution* to be the solution
with smallest $x$ among all solutions satisfying $x > 1$ and $y > 0$.
We show that every solution is a power (in the sense of the group structure mentioned above)
of the fundamental solution up to a (common) sign,
see `Pell.IsFundamental.eq_zpow_or_neg_zpow`, and that a (positive) solution has this property
if and only if it is fundamental, see `Pell.pos_generator_iff_fundamental`.
## References
* [K. Ireland, M. Rosen, *A classical introduction to modern number theory*
(Section 17.5)][IrelandRosen1990]
## Tags
Pell's equation
## TODO
* Extend to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = -1` and further generalizations.
* Connect solutions to the continued fraction expansion of `√d`.
-/
namespace Pell
/-!
### Group structure of the solution set
We define a structure of a commutative multiplicative group with distributive negation
on the set of all solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
The type of such solutions is `Pell.Solution₁ d`. It corresponds to a pair of integers `x` and `y`
and a proof that `(x, y)` is indeed a solution.
The multiplication is given by `(x, y) * (x', y') = (x*y' + d*y*y', x*y' + y*x')`.
This is obtained by mapping `(x, y)` to `x + y*√d` and multiplying the results.
In fact, we define `Pell.Solution₁ d` to be `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))` and transport
the "commutative group with distributive negation" structure from `↥(unitary (ℤ√d))`.
We then set up an API for `Pell.Solution₁ d`.
-/
open CharZero Zsqrtd
/-- An element of `ℤ√d` has norm one (i.e., `a.re^2 - d*a.im^2 = 1`) if and only if
it is contained in the submonoid of unitary elements.
TODO: merge this result with `Pell.isPell_iff_mem_unitary`. -/
theorem is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} :
a.re ^ 2 - d * a.im ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary, norm_def, sq, sq, ← mul_assoc]
-- We use `solution₁ d` to allow for a more general structure `solution d m` that
-- encodes solutions to `x^2 - d*y^2 = m` to be added later.
/-- `Pell.Solution₁ d` is the type of solutions to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1`.
We define this in terms of elements of `ℤ√d` of norm one.
-/
def Solution₁ (d : ℤ) : Type :=
↥(unitary (ℤ√d))
namespace Solution₁
variable {d : ℤ}
instance instCommGroup : CommGroup (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (CommGroup (unitary (ℤ√d)))
instance instHasDistribNeg : HasDistribNeg (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (HasDistribNeg (unitary (ℤ√d)))
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (unitary (ℤ√d)))
instance : Coe (Solution₁ d) (ℤ√d) where coe := Subtype.val
/-- The `x` component of a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
protected def x (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).re
/-- The `y` component of a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
protected def y (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).im
/-- The proof that `a` is a solution to the Pell equation `x^2 - d*y^2 = 1` -/
theorem prop (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 - d * a.y ^ 2 = 1 :=
is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mpr a.property
/-- An alternative form of the equation, suitable for rewriting `x^2`. -/
theorem prop_x (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 = 1 + d * a.y ^ 2 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
/-- An alternative form of the equation, suitable for rewriting `d * y^2`. -/
theorem prop_y (a : Solution₁ d) : d * a.y ^ 2 = a.x ^ 2 - 1 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
/-- Two solutions are equal if their `x` and `y` components are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {a b : Solution₁ d} (hx : a.x = b.x) (hy : a.y = b.y) : a = b :=
Subtype.ext <| Zsqrtd.ext hx hy
/-- Construct a solution from `x`, `y` and a proof that the equation is satisfied. -/
def mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : Solution₁ d where
val := ⟨x, y⟩
property := is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mp prop
@[simp]
theorem x_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).y = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (↑(mk x y prop) : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, y⟩ :=
Zsqrtd.ext (x_mk x y prop) (y_mk x y prop)
@[simp]
theorem x_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).x = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).y = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem x_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).x = a.x * b.x + d * (a.y * b.y) := by
rw [← mul_assoc]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).y = a.x * b.y + a.y * b.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem x_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.x = a.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.y = -a.y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem x_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).x = -a.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem y_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).y = -a.y :=
rfl
/-- When `d` is negative, then `x` or `y` must be zero in a solution. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_d_neg (h₀ : d < 0) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x = 0 ∨ a.y = 0 := by
have h := a.prop
contrapose! h
have h1 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.1
have h2 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.2
nlinarith
/-- A solution has `x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem x_ne_zero (h₀ : 0 ≤ d) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx
have h : 0 ≤ d * a.y ^ 2 := mul_nonneg h₀ (sq_nonneg _)
rw [a.prop_y, hx, sq, zero_mul, zero_sub] at h
exact not_le.mpr (neg_one_lt_zero : (-1 : ℤ) < 0) h
/-- A solution with `x > 1` must have `y ≠ 0`. -/
theorem y_ne_zero_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : a.y ≠ 0 := by
intro hy
have prop := a.prop
rw [hy, sq (0 : ℤ), zero_mul, mul_zero, sub_zero] at prop
exact lt_irrefl _ (((one_lt_sq_iff₀ <| zero_le_one.trans ha.le).mpr ha).trans_eq prop)
/-- If a solution has `x > 1`, then `d` is positive. -/
theorem d_pos_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : 0 < d := by
refine pos_of_mul_pos_left ?_ (sq_nonneg a.y)
rw [a.prop_y, sub_pos]
exact one_lt_pow₀ ha two_ne_zero
/-- If a solution has `x > 1`, then `d` is not a square. -/
theorem d_nonsquare_of_one_lt_x {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : 1 < a.x) : ¬IsSquare d := by
have hp := a.prop
rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← sq, ← mul_pow, sq_sub_sq, Int.mul_eq_one_iff_eq_one_or_neg_one] at hp
omega
/-- A solution with `x = 1` is trivial. -/
theorem eq_one_of_x_eq_one (h₀ : d ≠ 0) {a : Solution₁ d} (ha : a.x = 1) : a = 1 := by
have prop := a.prop_y
rw [ha, one_pow, sub_self, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right h₀, sq_eq_zero_iff] at prop
exact ext ha prop
/-- A solution is `1` or `-1` if and only if `y = 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one_iff_y_eq_zero {a : Solution₁ d} : a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ↔ a.y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.elim (fun h => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h], fun H => ?_⟩
have prop := a.prop
rw [H, sq (0 : ℤ), mul_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, sq_eq_one_iff] at prop
exact prop.imp (fun h => ext h H) fun h => ext h H
/-- The set of solutions with `x > 0` is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem x_mul_pos {a b : Solution₁ d} (ha : 0 < a.x) (hb : 0 < b.x) : 0 < (a * b).x := by
simp only [x_mul]
refine neg_lt_iff_pos_add'.mp (abs_lt.mp ?_).1
rw [← abs_of_pos ha, ← abs_of_pos hb, ← abs_mul, ← sq_lt_sq, mul_pow a.x, a.prop_x, b.prop_x, ←
sub_pos]
ring_nf
rcases le_or_lt 0 d with h | h
· positivity
· rw [(eq_zero_of_d_neg h a).resolve_left ha.ne', (eq_zero_of_d_neg h b).resolve_left hb.ne']
simp
/-- The set of solutions with `x` and `y` positive is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem y_mul_pos {a b : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) (hbx : 0 < b.x)
(hby : 0 < b.y) : 0 < (a * b).y := by
simp only [y_mul]
positivity
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` positive, then all its powers with natural exponents
have positive `x`. -/
theorem x_pow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (n : ℕ) : 0 < (a ^ n).x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, x_one, zero_lt_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ]; exact x_mul_pos ih hax
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then all its powers with positive
natural exponents have positive `y`. -/
theorem y_pow_succ_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) (n : ℕ) :
0 < (a ^ n.succ).y := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_one, hay]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ']; exact y_mul_pos hax hay (x_pow_pos hax _) ih
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` and `y` positive, then all its powers with positive
exponents have positive `y`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Pell.lean | 264 | 277 | theorem y_zpow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (hay : 0 < a.y) {n : ℤ} (hn : 0 < n) :
0 < (a ^ n).y := by | lift n to ℕ using hn.le
norm_cast at hn ⊢
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
exact y_pow_succ_pos hax hay _
/-- If `(x, y)` is a solution with `x` positive, then all its powers have positive `x`. -/
theorem x_zpow_pos {a : Solution₁ d} (hax : 0 < a.x) (n : ℤ) : 0 < (a ^ n).x := by
cases n with
| ofNat n =>
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact x_pow_pos hax n
| negSucc n => |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
/-!
# Infimum separation
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `Set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `Set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `Set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_iff {d} :
s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < d := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 74 | 76 | theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.einfsep < ∞) : s.Nontrivial := by | rcases einfsep_lt_top.1 hs with ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy, _⟩
exact ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 626 | 629 | theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by | cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.