Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
/-!
# Pullbacks and pushouts in the category of topological spaces
-/
open TopologicalSpace Topology
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [Category.{w} J]
section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
/-- The first projection from the pullback. -/
abbrev pullbackFst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ X :=
ofHom ⟨Prod.fst ∘ Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩
lemma pullbackFst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackFst f g x = x.1.1 := rfl
/-- The second projection from the pullback. -/
abbrev pullbackSnd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ Y :=
ofHom ⟨Prod.snd ∘ Subtype.val, by fun_prop⟩
lemma pullbackSnd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackSnd f g x = x.1.2 := rfl
/-- The explicit pullback cone of `X, Y` given by `{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }`. -/
def pullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackFst f g) (pullbackSnd f g)
(by
dsimp [pullbackFst, pullbackSnd, Function.comp_def]
ext ⟨x, h⟩
simpa)
/-- The constructed cone is a limit. -/
def pullbackConeIsLimit (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : IsLimit (pullbackCone f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _
(by
intro S
constructor; swap
· exact ofHom
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨S.fst x, S.snd x⟩, by simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom S.condition x⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop }
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
dsimp
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
dsimp
· intro m h₁ h₂
ext x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): used to be `ext x`.
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₂ x)
/-- The pullback of two maps can be identified as a subspace of `X × Y`. -/
def pullbackIsoProdSubtype (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
pullback f g ≅ TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackConeIsLimit f g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = pullbackFst f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
pullback.fst f g ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).fst :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst f g) x
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = pullbackSnd f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
pullback.snd f g ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).snd :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd f g) x
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackFst f g = pullback.fst _ _ := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackSnd f g = pullback.snd _ _ := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(x : ↑(pullback f g)) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom x =
⟨⟨pullback.fst f g x, pullback.snd f g x⟩, by
simpa using CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩ := by
apply Subtype.ext; apply Prod.ext
exacts [ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst f g) x,
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd f g) x]
theorem pullback_topology {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullback f g).str =
induced (pullback.fst f g) X.str ⊓
induced (pullback.snd f g) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g)
refine homeo.isInducing.eq_induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (induced _ ( (induced Prod.fst X.str) ⊓ (induced Prod.snd Y.str))) = _
simp only [induced_compose, induced_inf]
congr
theorem range_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) =
{ x | (Limits.prod.fst ≫ f) x = (Limits.prod.snd ≫ g) x } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
simp [pullback.condition]
· rintro (h : f (_, _).1 = g (_, _).2)
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h⟩
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, limit.lift_π] <;>
-- This used to be `simp` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
aesop_cat
/-- The pullback along an embedding is (isomorphic to) the preimage. -/
noncomputable
def pullbackHomeoPreimage
{X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
(f : X → Z) (hf : Continuous f) (g : Y → Z) (hg : IsEmbedding g) :
{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ≃ₜ f ⁻¹' Set.range g where
toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x.1.1, _, x.2.symm⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x.1, Exists.choose x.2⟩, (Exists.choose_spec x.2).symm⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext <;> dsimp
apply hg.injective
convert x.prop
exact Exists.choose_spec (p := fun y ↦ g y = f (↑x : X × Y).1) _
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
refine continuous_subtype_val.prodMk <| hg.isInducing.continuous_iff.mpr ?_
convert hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
ext x
exact Exists.choose_spec x.2
theorem isInducing_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
IsInducing <| ⇑(prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) :=
⟨by simp [prod_topology, pullback_topology, induced_compose, ← coe_comp]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_pullback_to_prod := isInducing_pullback_to_prod
theorem isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
IsEmbedding <| ⇑(prod.lift (pullback.fst f g) (pullback.snd f g)) :=
⟨isInducing_pullback_to_prod f g, (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_pullback_to_prod := isEmbedding_pullback_to_prod
/-- If the map `S ⟶ T` is mono, then there is a description of the image of `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z`. -/
theorem range_pullback_map {W X Y Z S T : TopCat} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Set.range (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) =
(pullback.fst g₁ g₂) ⁻¹' Set.range i₁ ∩ (pullback.snd g₁ g₂) ⁻¹' Set.range i₂ := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range]
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app]
exact ⟨exists_apply_eq_apply _ _, exists_apply_eq_apply _ _⟩
rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
have : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂ := by
apply (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp H₃
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, eq₁, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, eq₂,
ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, hx₁, hx₂,
← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, pullback.condition, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f₁ f₂).inv ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, this⟩
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;>
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
· simp [hx₁, ← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inl]
· simp [hx₁]
· simp [hx₂]
theorem pullback_fst_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.fst f g) = { x : X | ∃ y : Y, f x = g y } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
| use pullback.snd f g y
exact CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition y
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
theorem pullback_snd_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.snd f g) = { y : Y | ∃ x : X, f x = g y } := by
ext y
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
use pullback.fst f g x
exact CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x
· rintro ⟨x, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
/-- If there is a diagram where the morphisms `W ⟶ Y` and `X ⟶ Z` are embeddings,
then the induced morphism `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z` is also an embedding.
```
W ⟶ Y
↘ ↘
S ⟶ T
↗ ↗
X ⟶ Z
```
-/
theorem pullback_map_isEmbedding {W X Y Z S T : TopCat.{u}} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S)
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) {i₁ : W ⟶ Y} {i₂ : X ⟶ Z} (H₁ : IsEmbedding i₁)
(H₂ : IsEmbedding i₂) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
IsEmbedding (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine .of_comp (ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
(show Continuous (prod.lift (pullback.fst g₁ g₂) (pullback.snd g₁ g₂)) from
ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
?_
suffices
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Pullbacks.lean | 211 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbotD_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbotD_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
natDegree (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_natCast _
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
theorem withBotSucc_degree_eq_natDegree_add_one (h : p ≠ 0) : p.degree.succ = p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
exact WithBot.succ_coe p.natDegree
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
rcases le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h | h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl])
fun a s has ih =>
calc
degree (∑ i ∈ cons a s has, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i)) := by
rw [Finset.sum_cons]; exact degree_add_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [sup_cons]; exact max_le_max le_rfl ih
theorem degree_mul_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_mul_le (WithBot.coe_add _ _).le _ _
theorem degree_mul_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p * q) ≤ a + b :=
(p.degree_mul_le _).trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_pow_le (p : R[X]) : ∀ n : ℕ, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n • degree p
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| n + 1 =>
calc
degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree (p ^ n) + degree p := by
rw [pow_succ]; exact degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [succ_nsmul]; exact add_le_add_right (degree_pow_le _ _) _
theorem degree_pow_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} (b : ℕ) (hp : degree p ≤ a) :
degree (p ^ b) ≤ b * a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp [degree_one_le]
| succ n hn =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ]
exact degree_mul_le_of_le hn hp
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (monomial n a) = a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, (monomial n).map_zero, leadingCoeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_monomial, if_neg ha, coeff_monomial]
simp
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ n) = a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leadingCoeff_monomial]
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a * X) = a := by
simpa only [pow_one] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow a 1
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_C (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a) = a :=
leadingCoeff_monomial a 0
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = 1 := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n
theorem leadingCoeff_X : leadingCoeff (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @leadingCoeff_X_pow R _ 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_X_pow (n : ℕ) : Monic (X ^ n : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow n
@[simp]
theorem monic_X : Monic (X : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X
theorem leadingCoeff_one : leadingCoeff (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_C 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_one : Monic (1 : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_C _
theorem Monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [Monic] at hp
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0 : R) ≠ 1) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
exact hp.ne_zero
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : Monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne
hp.ne_zero
theorem natDegree_mul_le {p q : R[X]} : natDegree (p * q) ≤ natDegree p + natDegree q := by
apply natDegree_le_of_degree_le
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q)
rw [Nat.cast_add]
apply add_le_add <;> apply degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_mul_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hg : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p * q) ≤ m + n :=
natDegree_mul_le.trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_pow_le {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).natDegree ≤ n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ i hi =>
rw [pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
apply le_trans natDegree_mul_le (add_le_add_right hi _)
theorem natDegree_pow_le_of_le (n : ℕ) (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) :
natDegree (p ^ n) ≤ n * m :=
natDegree_pow_le.trans (Nat.mul_le_mul le_rfl ‹_›)
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.cast_zero]
theorem degree_zero_le : degree (0 : R[X]) ≤ 0 := natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp rfl
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : WithBot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.max, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, ← not_le,
not_imp_comm, Nat.cast_withBot]
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ, max_eq_sup_coe, Nat.cast_withBot, Ne, not_imp_not]
theorem natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos : 0 < natDegree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
end Semiring
section NontrivialSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_pow : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X_pow : natDegree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow n)
end NontrivialSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree_neg q] using degree_add_le p (-q)
theorem degree_sub_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p - q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p - q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
simpa only [← natDegree_neg q] using natDegree_add_le p (-q)
theorem natDegree_sub_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p - q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p = leadingCoeff q) : degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : monomial (natDegree p) (leadingCoeff p) + p.erase (natDegree p) = p :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hq : monomial (natDegree q) (leadingCoeff q) + q.erase (natDegree q) = q :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hd' : natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [hd]
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0)
calc
degree (p - q) = degree (erase (natDegree q) p + -erase (natDegree q) q) := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (degree (erase (natDegree q) p)) (degree (erase (natDegree q) q)) :=
(degree_neg (erase (natDegree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _)
_ < degree p := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
theorem degree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).degree ≤ 1 :=
(degree_sub_le _ _).trans (max_le degree_X_le (degree_C_le.trans zero_le_one))
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_X_sub_C_le r
end Ring
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 1,067 | 1,072 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
/-!
# Additional properties of binary recursion on `Nat`
This file documents additional properties of binary recursion,
which allows us to more easily work with operations which do depend
on the number of leading zeros in the binary representation of `n`.
For example, we can more easily work with `Nat.bits` and `Nat.size`.
See also: `Nat.bitwise`, `Nat.pow` (for various lemmas about `size` and `shiftLeft`/`shiftRight`),
and `Nat.digits`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
-- Once we're in the `Nat` namespace, `xor` will inconveniently resolve to `Nat.xor`.
/-- `bxor` denotes the `xor` function i.e. the exclusive-or function on type `Bool`. -/
local notation "bxor" => xor
namespace Nat
universe u
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- `boddDiv2 n` returns a 2-tuple of type `(Bool, Nat)` where the `Bool` value indicates whether
`n` is odd or not and the `Nat` value returns `⌊n/2⌋` -/
def boddDiv2 : ℕ → Bool × ℕ
| 0 => (false, 0)
| succ n =>
match boddDiv2 n with
| (false, m) => (true, m)
| (true, m) => (false, succ m)
/-- `div2 n = ⌊n/2⌋` the greatest integer smaller than `n/2` -/
def div2 (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (boddDiv2 n).2
/-- `bodd n` returns `true` if `n` is odd -/
def bodd (n : ℕ) : Bool := (boddDiv2 n).1
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = false := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = true := rfl
lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = false := rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_succ (n : ℕ) : bodd (succ n) = not (bodd n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2]
let ⟨b,m⟩ := boddDiv2 n
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_add (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) := by
induction n
case zero => simp
case succ n ih => simp [← Nat.add_assoc, Bool.xor_not, ih]
@[simp]
lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m * n) = (bodd m && bodd n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
simp only [mul_succ, bodd_add, IH, bodd_succ]
cases bodd m <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma mod_two_of_bodd (n : ℕ) : n % 2 = (bodd n).toNat := by
have := congr_arg bodd (mod_add_div n 2)
simp? [not] at this says
simp only [bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, not, bodd_zero, Bool.false_and, Bool.bne_false]
at this
have _ : ∀ b, and false b = false := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
have _ : ∀ b, bxor b false = b := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
rw [← this]
rcases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h | h <;> rw [h] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_zero : div2 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_one : div2 1 = 0 := rfl
lemma div2_two : div2 2 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma div2_succ (n : ℕ) : div2 (n + 1) = cond (bodd n) (succ (div2 n)) (div2 n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2, div2]
rcases boddDiv2 n with ⟨_|_, _⟩ <;> simp
attribute [local simp] Nat.add_comm Nat.add_assoc Nat.add_left_comm Nat.mul_comm Nat.mul_assoc
lemma bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, (bodd n).toNat + 2 * div2 n = n
| 0 => rfl
| succ n => by
simp only [bodd_succ, Bool.cond_not, div2_succ, Nat.mul_comm]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (congr_arg succ (bodd_add_div2 n))
cases bodd n
· simp
· simp; omega
lemma div2_val (n) : div2 n = n / 2 := by
refine Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (by decide)
(Nat.add_left_cancel (Eq.trans ?_ (Nat.mod_add_div n 2).symm))
rw [mod_two_of_bodd, bodd_add_div2]
lemma bit_decomp (n : Nat) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans <| (Nat.add_comm _ _).trans <| bodd_add_div2 _
lemma bit_zero : bit false 0 = 0 :=
rfl
/-- `shiftLeft' b m n` performs a left shift of `m` `n` times
and adds the bit `b` as the least significant bit each time.
Returns the corresponding natural number -/
def shiftLeft' (b : Bool) (m : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => m
| n + 1 => bit b (shiftLeft' b m n)
@[simp]
| lemma shiftLeft'_false : ∀ n, shiftLeft' false m n = m <<< n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
have : 2 * (m * 2^n) = 2^(n+1)*m := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bits.lean | 131 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
| @[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 610 | 613 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
/-!
# Convex combinations
This file defines convex combinations of points in a vector space.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.centerMass`: Center of mass of a finite family of points.
## Implementation notes
We divide by the sum of the weights in the definition of `Finset.centerMass` because of the way
mathematical arguments go: one doesn't change weights, but merely adds some. This also makes a few
lemmas unconditional on the sum of the weights being `1`.
-/
open Set Function Pointwise
universe u u'
section
variable {R R' E F ι ι' α : Type*} [Field R] [Field R'] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
[AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [Module R E] [Module R F] [Module R α] {s : Set E}
/-- Center of mass of a finite collection of points with prescribed weights.
Note that we require neither `0 ≤ w i` nor `∑ w = 1`. -/
def Finset.centerMass (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E) : E :=
(∑ i ∈ t, w i)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i
variable (i j : ι) (c : R) (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
open Finset
theorem Finset.centerMass_empty : (∅ : Finset ι).centerMass w z = 0 := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_empty, smul_zero]
theorem Finset.centerMass_pair [DecidableEq ι] (hne : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = (w i / (w i + w j)) • z i + (w j / (w i + w j)) • z j := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_pair hne]
module
variable {w}
theorem Finset.centerMass_insert [DecidableEq ι] (ha : i ∉ t) (hw : ∑ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0) :
(insert i t).centerMass w z =
(w i / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • z i +
((∑ j ∈ t, w j) / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert ha, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hw, one_div]
theorem Finset.centerMass_singleton (hw : w i ≠ 0) : ({i} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = z i := by
rw [centerMass, sum_singleton, sum_singleton]
match_scalars
field_simp
@[simp] lemma Finset.centerMass_neg_left : t.centerMass (-w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, inv_neg]
lemma Finset.centerMass_smul_left {c : R'} [Module R' R] [Module R' E] [SMulCommClass R' R R]
[IsScalarTower R' R R] [SMulCommClass R R' E] [IsScalarTower R' R E] (hc : c ≠ 0) :
t.centerMass (c • w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, -smul_assoc, smul_assoc c, ← smul_sum, smul_inv₀, smul_smul_smul_comm, hc]
theorem Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 (hw : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) :
t.centerMass w z = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, hw, inv_one, one_smul]
theorem Finset.centerMass_smul : (t.centerMass w fun i => c • z i) = c • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, Finset.smul_sum, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]
/-- A convex combination of two centers of mass is a center of mass as well. This version
deals with two different index types. -/
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset ι') (ws : ι → R) (zs : ι → E)
(wt : ι' → R) (zt : ι' → E) (hws : ∑ i ∈ s, ws i = 1) (hwt : ∑ i ∈ t, wt i = 1) (a b : R)
(hab : a + b = 1) : a • s.centerMass ws zs + b • t.centerMass wt zt = (s.disjSum t).centerMass
(Sum.elim (fun i => a * ws i) fun j => b * wt j) (Sum.elim zs zt) := by
rw [s.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hws, t.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hwt, smul_sum, smul_sum, ←
Finset.sum_sumElim, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· congr with ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr, mul_smul]
· rw [sum_sumElim, ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hws, hwt, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
/-- A convex combination of two centers of mass is a center of mass as well. This version
works if two centers of mass share the set of original points. -/
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment (s : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) (a b : R) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • s.centerMass w₁ z + b • s.centerMass w₂ z =
s.centerMass (fun i => a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i) z := by
have hw : (∑ i ∈ s, (a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i)) = 1 := by
simp only [← mul_sum, sum_add_distrib, mul_one, *]
simp only [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw,
smul_sum, sum_add_distrib, add_smul, mul_smul, *]
theorem Finset.centerMass_ite_eq [DecidableEq ι] (hi : i ∈ t) :
t.centerMass (fun j => if i = j then (1 : R) else 0) z = z i := by
rw [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· trans ∑ j ∈ t, if i = j then z i else 0
· congr with i
split_ifs with h
exacts [h ▸ one_smul _ _, zero_smul _ _]
· rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi]
· rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi]
variable {t}
theorem Finset.centerMass_subset {t' : Finset ι} (ht : t ⊆ t') (h : ∀ i ∈ t', i ∉ t → w i = 0) :
t.centerMass w z = t'.centerMass w z := by
rw [centerMass, sum_subset ht h, smul_sum, centerMass, smul_sum]
apply sum_subset ht
intro i hit' hit
rw [h i hit' hit, zero_smul, smul_zero]
theorem Finset.centerMass_filter_ne_zero [∀ i, Decidable (w i ≠ 0)] :
{i ∈ t | w i ≠ 0}.centerMass w z = t.centerMass w z :=
Finset.centerMass_subset z (filter_subset _ _) fun i hit hit' => by
simpa only [hit, mem_filter, true_and, Ne, Classical.not_not] using hit'
namespace Finset
variable [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [OrderedSMul R α]
theorem centerMass_le_sup {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i) :
s.centerMass w f ≤ s.sup' (nonempty_of_ne_empty <| by rintro rfl; simp at hw₁) f := by
rw [centerMass, inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos hw₁, sum_smul]
exact sum_le_sum fun i hi => smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left (le_sup' _ hi) <| hw₀ i hi
theorem inf_le_centerMass {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i) :
s.inf' (nonempty_of_ne_empty <| by rintro rfl; simp at hw₁) f ≤ s.centerMass w f :=
centerMass_le_sup (α := αᵒᵈ) hw₀ hw₁
end Finset
variable {z}
lemma Finset.centerMass_of_sum_add_sum_eq_zero {s t : Finset ι}
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i + ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 0) (hz : ∑ i ∈ s, w i • z i + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i = 0) :
s.centerMass w z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right hw, eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hz, ← neg_inv]
variable [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [OrderedSMul R α]
/-- The center of mass of a finite subset of a convex set belongs to the set
provided that all weights are non-negative, and the total weight is positive. -/
theorem Convex.centerMass_mem (hs : Convex R s) :
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → (0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) → (∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) → t.centerMass w z ∈ s := by
classical
induction' t using Finset.induction with i t hi ht
· simp [lt_irrefl]
intro h₀ hpos hmem
have zi : z i ∈ s := hmem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
have hs₀ : ∀ j ∈ t, 0 ≤ w j := fun j hj => h₀ j <| mem_insert_of_mem hj
rw [sum_insert hi] at hpos
by_cases hsum_t : ∑ j ∈ t, w j = 0
· have ws : ∀ j ∈ t, w j = 0 := (sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg hs₀).1 hsum_t
have wz : ∑ j ∈ t, w j • z j = 0 := sum_eq_zero fun i hi => by simp [ws i hi]
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert hi, wz, hsum_t, add_zero]
simp only [hsum_t, add_zero] at hpos
rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (ne_of_gt hpos), one_smul]
exact zi
· rw [Finset.centerMass_insert _ _ _ hi hsum_t]
refine convex_iff_div.1 hs zi (ht hs₀ ?_ ?_) ?_ (sum_nonneg hs₀) hpos
· exact lt_of_le_of_ne (sum_nonneg hs₀) (Ne.symm hsum_t)
· intro j hj
exact hmem j (mem_insert_of_mem hj)
· exact h₀ _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
theorem Convex.sum_mem (hs : Convex R s) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1)
(hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i) ∈ s := by
simpa only [h₁, centerMass, inv_one, one_smul] using
hs.centerMass_mem h₀ (h₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hz
/-- A version of `Convex.sum_mem` for `finsum`s. If `s` is a convex set, `w : ι → R` is a family of
nonnegative weights with sum one and `z : ι → E` is a family of elements of a module over `R` such
that `z i ∈ s` whenever `w i ≠ 0`, then the sum `∑ᶠ i, w i • z i` belongs to `s`. See also
`PartitionOfUnity.finsum_smul_mem_convex`. -/
theorem Convex.finsum_mem {ι : Sort*} {w : ι → R} {z : ι → E} {s : Set E} (hs : Convex R s)
(h₀ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ᶠ i, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i, w i ≠ 0 → z i ∈ s) :
(∑ᶠ i, w i • z i) ∈ s := by
have hfin_w : (support (w ∘ PLift.down)).Finite := by
by_contra H
rw [finsum, dif_neg H] at h₁
exact zero_ne_one h₁
have hsub : support ((fun i => w i • z i) ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ hfin_w.toFinset :=
(support_smul_subset_left _ _).trans hfin_w.coe_toFinset.ge
rw [finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset hsub]
refine hs.sum_mem (fun _ _ => h₀ _) ?_ fun i hi => hz _ ?_
· rwa [finsum, dif_pos hfin_w] at h₁
· rwa [hfin_w.mem_toFinset] at hi
theorem convex_iff_sum_mem : Convex R s ↔ ∀ (t : Finset E) (w : E → R),
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1 → (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) → (∑ x ∈ t, w x • x) ∈ s := by
classical
refine ⟨fun hs t w hw₀ hw₁ hts => hs.sum_mem hw₀ hw₁ hts, ?_⟩
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
by_cases h_cases : x = y
· rw [h_cases, ← add_smul, hab, one_smul]
exact hy
· convert h {x, y} (fun z => if z = y then b else a) _ _ _
· simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos trivial]
· intro i _
simp only
split_ifs <;> assumption
· simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos trivial, hab]
· intro i hi
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_insert] at hi
cases hi <;> subst i <;> assumption
theorem Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull (t : Finset ι) {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(hws : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) {z : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) :
t.centerMass w z ∈ convexHull R s :=
(convex_convexHull R s).centerMass_mem hw₀ hws fun i hi => subset_convexHull R s <| hz i hi
/-- A version of `Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull` for when the weights are nonpositive. -/
lemma Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos (t : Finset ι) (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, w i ≤ 0)
(hws : ∑ i ∈ t, w i < 0) (hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) : t.centerMass w z ∈ convexHull R s := by
rw [← centerMass_neg_left]
exact Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull _ (fun _i hi ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hw₀ _ hi) (by simpa) hz
/-- A refinement of `Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull` when the indexed family is a `Finset` of
the space. -/
theorem Finset.centerMass_id_mem_convexHull (t : Finset E) {w : E → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(hws : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) : t.centerMass w id ∈ convexHull R (t : Set E) :=
t.centerMass_mem_convexHull hw₀ hws fun _ => mem_coe.2
/-- A version of `Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull` for when the weights are nonpositive. -/
lemma Finset.centerMass_id_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos (t : Finset E) {w : E → R}
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, w i ≤ 0) (hws : ∑ i ∈ t, w i < 0) :
t.centerMass w id ∈ convexHull R (t : Set E) :=
t.centerMass_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos hw₀ hws fun _ ↦ mem_coe.2
omit [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
theorem affineCombination_eq_centerMass {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {p : ι → E} {w : ι → R}
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) : t.affineCombination R p w = centerMass t w p := by
rw [affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ w _ hw₂ (0 : E),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, vadd_eq_add, add_zero, t.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hw₂]
simp_rw [vsub_eq_sub, sub_zero]
theorem affineCombination_mem_convexHull {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → E} {w : ι → R}
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : s.sum w = 1) :
s.affineCombination R v w ∈ convexHull R (range v) := by
rw [affineCombination_eq_centerMass hw₁]
apply s.centerMass_mem_convexHull hw₀
· simp [hw₁]
· simp
/-- The centroid can be regarded as a center of mass. -/
@[simp]
theorem Finset.centroid_eq_centerMass (s : Finset ι) (hs : s.Nonempty) (p : ι → E) :
s.centroid R p = s.centerMass (s.centroidWeights R) p :=
affineCombination_eq_centerMass (s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty R hs)
theorem Finset.centroid_mem_convexHull (s : Finset E) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.centroid R id ∈ convexHull R (s : Set E) := by
rw [s.centroid_eq_centerMass hs]
apply s.centerMass_id_mem_convexHull
· simp only [inv_nonneg, imp_true_iff, Nat.cast_nonneg, Finset.centroidWeights_apply]
· have hs_card : (#s : R) ≠ 0 := by simp [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.mp hs]
simp only [hs_card, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀, Ne, not_false_iff,
Finset.centroidWeights_apply, zero_lt_one]
theorem convexHull_range_eq_exists_affineCombination (v : ι → E) : convexHull R (range v) =
{ x | ∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → R), (∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) ∧ s.sum w = 1 ∧
s.affineCombination R v w = x } := by
classical
refine Subset.antisymm (convexHull_min ?_ ?_) ?_
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.mp hx
exact ⟨{i}, Function.const ι (1 : R), by simp, by simp, by simp [hi]⟩
· rintro x ⟨s, w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩ y ⟨s', w', hw₀', hw₁', rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
let W : ι → R := fun i => (if i ∈ s then a * w i else 0) + if i ∈ s' then b * w' i else 0
have hW₁ : (s ∪ s').sum W = 1 := by
rw [sum_add_distrib, ← sum_subset subset_union_left,
← sum_subset subset_union_right, sum_ite_of_true,
sum_ite_of_true, ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hw₁, hw₁', ← add_mul, hab,
mul_one] <;> intros <;> simp_all
refine ⟨s ∪ s', W, ?_, hW₁, ?_⟩
· rintro i -
by_cases hi : i ∈ s <;> by_cases hi' : i ∈ s' <;>
simp [W, hi, hi', add_nonneg, mul_nonneg ha (hw₀ i _), mul_nonneg hb (hw₀' i _)]
· simp_rw [W, affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s ∪ s') v _ hW₁,
affineCombination_eq_linear_combination s v w hw₁,
affineCombination_eq_linear_combination s' v w' hw₁', add_smul, sum_add_distrib]
rw [← sum_subset subset_union_left, ← sum_subset subset_union_right]
· simp only [ite_smul, sum_ite_of_true fun _ hi => hi, mul_smul, ← smul_sum]
· intro i _ hi'
simp [hi']
· intro i _ hi'
simp [hi']
· rintro x ⟨s, w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩
exact affineCombination_mem_convexHull hw₀ hw₁
/--
Convex hull of `s` is equal to the set of all centers of masses of `Finset`s `t`, `z '' t ⊆ s`.
For universe reasons, you shouldn't use this lemma to prove that a given center of mass belongs
to the convex hull. Use convexity of the convex hull instead.
-/
theorem convexHull_eq (s : Set E) : convexHull R s =
{ x : E | ∃ (ι : Type) (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E), (∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) ∧
∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1 ∧ (∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) ∧ t.centerMass w z = x } := by
refine Subset.antisymm (convexHull_min ?_ ?_) ?_
· intro x hx
use PUnit, {PUnit.unit}, fun _ => 1, fun _ => x, fun _ _ => zero_le_one, sum_singleton _ _,
fun _ _ => hx
simp only [Finset.centerMass, Finset.sum_singleton, inv_one, one_smul]
· rintro x ⟨ι, sx, wx, zx, hwx₀, hwx₁, hzx, rfl⟩ y ⟨ι', sy, wy, zy, hwy₀, hwy₁, hzy, rfl⟩ a b ha
hb hab
rw [Finset.centerMass_segment' _ _ _ _ _ _ hwx₁ hwy₁ _ _ hab]
refine ⟨_, _, _, _, ?_, ?_, ?_, rfl⟩
· rintro i hi
rw [Finset.mem_disjSum] at hi
rcases hi with (⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ | ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩) <;> simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr] <;>
apply_rules [mul_nonneg, hwx₀, hwy₀]
· simp [Finset.sum_sumElim, ← mul_sum, *]
· intro i hi
rw [Finset.mem_disjSum] at hi
rcases hi with (⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ | ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩) <;> apply_rules [hzx, hzy]
· rintro _ ⟨ι, t, w, z, hw₀, hw₁, hz, rfl⟩
exact t.centerMass_mem_convexHull hw₀ (hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hz
/-- Universe polymorphic version of the reverse implication of `mem_convexHull_iff_exists_fintype`.
-/
lemma mem_convexHull_of_exists_fintype {s : Set E} {x : E} [Fintype ι] (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₀ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : ∑ i, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i, z i ∈ s) (hx : ∑ i, w i • z i = x) :
x ∈ convexHull R s := by
rw [← hx, ← centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw₁]
exact centerMass_mem_convexHull _ (by simpa using hw₀) (by simp [hw₁]) (by simpa using hz)
/-- The convex hull of `s` is equal to the set of centers of masses of finite families of points in
`s`.
For universe reasons, you shouldn't use this lemma to prove that a given center of mass belongs
to the convex hull. Use `mem_convexHull_of_exists_fintype` of the convex hull instead. -/
lemma mem_convexHull_iff_exists_fintype {s : Set E} {x : E} :
x ∈ convexHull R s ↔ ∃ (ι : Type) (_ : Fintype ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E), (∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) ∧
∑ i, w i = 1 ∧ (∀ i, z i ∈ s) ∧ ∑ i, w i • z i = x := by
constructor
· simp only [convexHull_eq, mem_setOf_eq]
rintro ⟨ι, t, w, z, h⟩
refine ⟨t, inferInstance, w ∘ (↑), z ∘ (↑), ?_⟩
simpa [← sum_attach t, centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ h.2.1] using h
· rintro ⟨ι, _, w, z, hw₀, hw₁, hz, hx⟩
exact mem_convexHull_of_exists_fintype w z hw₀ hw₁ hz hx
theorem Finset.convexHull_eq (s : Finset E) : convexHull R ↑s =
{ x : E | ∃ w : E → R, (∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y) ∧ ∑ y ∈ s, w y = 1 ∧ s.centerMass w id = x } := by
classical
refine Set.Subset.antisymm (convexHull_min ?_ ?_) ?_
· intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_coe] at hx
refine ⟨_, ?_, ?_, Finset.centerMass_ite_eq _ _ _ hx⟩
· intros
split_ifs
exacts [zero_le_one, le_refl 0]
· rw [Finset.sum_ite_eq, if_pos hx]
· rintro x ⟨wx, hwx₀, hwx₁, rfl⟩ y ⟨wy, hwy₀, hwy₁, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
rw [Finset.centerMass_segment _ _ _ _ hwx₁ hwy₁ _ _ hab]
refine ⟨_, ?_, ?_, rfl⟩
· rintro i hi
apply_rules [add_nonneg, mul_nonneg, hwx₀, hwy₀]
· simp only [Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← mul_sum, mul_one, *]
· rintro _ ⟨w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩
exact
s.centerMass_mem_convexHull (fun x hx => hw₀ _ hx) (hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) fun x hx => hx
theorem Finset.mem_convexHull {s : Finset E} {x : E} : x ∈ convexHull R (s : Set E) ↔
∃ w : E → R, (∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y) ∧ ∑ y ∈ s, w y = 1 ∧ s.centerMass w id = x := by
rw [Finset.convexHull_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
/-- This is a version of `Finset.mem_convexHull` stated without `Finset.centerMass`. -/
lemma Finset.mem_convexHull' {s : Finset E} {x : E} :
x ∈ convexHull R (s : Set E) ↔
∃ w : E → R, (∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y) ∧ ∑ y ∈ s, w y = 1 ∧ ∑ y ∈ s, w y • y = x := by
rw [mem_convexHull]
refine exists_congr fun w ↦ and_congr_right' <| and_congr_right fun hw ↦ ?_
simp_rw [centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw, id_eq]
theorem Set.Finite.convexHull_eq {s : Set E} (hs : s.Finite) : convexHull R s =
{ x : E | ∃ w : E → R, (∀ y ∈ s, 0 ≤ w y) ∧ ∑ y ∈ hs.toFinset, w y = 1 ∧
hs.toFinset.centerMass w id = x } := by
simpa only [Set.Finite.coe_toFinset, Set.Finite.mem_toFinset, exists_prop] using
hs.toFinset.convexHull_eq
/-- A weak version of Carathéodory's theorem. -/
theorem convexHull_eq_union_convexHull_finite_subsets (s : Set E) :
convexHull R s = ⋃ (t : Finset E) (_ : ↑t ⊆ s), convexHull R ↑t := by
classical
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [_root_.convexHull_eq]
rintro x ⟨ι, t, w, z, hw₀, hw₁, hz, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion]
refine ⟨t.image z, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
exact hz
· apply t.centerMass_mem_convexHull hw₀
· simp only [hw₁, zero_lt_one]
· exact fun i hi => Finset.mem_coe.2 (Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· exact iUnion_subset fun i => iUnion_subset convexHull_mono
theorem mk_mem_convexHull_prod {t : Set F} {x : E} {y : F} (hx : x ∈ convexHull R s)
(hy : y ∈ convexHull R t) : (x, y) ∈ convexHull R (s ×ˢ t) := by
rw [mem_convexHull_iff_exists_fintype] at hx hy ⊢
obtain ⟨ι, _, w, f, hw₀, hw₁, hfs, hf⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨κ, _, v, g, hv₀, hv₁, hgt, hg⟩ := hy
have h_sum : ∑ i : ι × κ, w i.1 * v i.2 = 1 := by
rw [Fintype.sum_prod_type, ← sum_mul_sum, hw₁, hv₁, mul_one]
refine ⟨ι × κ, inferInstance, fun p => w p.1 * v p.2, fun p ↦ (f p.1, g p.2),
fun p ↦ mul_nonneg (hw₀ _) (hv₀ _), h_sum, fun p ↦ ⟨hfs _, hgt _⟩, ?_⟩
ext
· simp_rw [Prod.fst_sum, Prod.smul_mk, Fintype.sum_prod_type, mul_comm (w _), mul_smul,
sum_comm (γ := ι), ← Fintype.sum_smul_sum, hv₁, one_smul, hf]
· simp_rw [Prod.snd_sum, Prod.smul_mk, Fintype.sum_prod_type, mul_smul, ← Fintype.sum_smul_sum,
hw₁, one_smul, hg]
@[simp]
theorem convexHull_prod (s : Set E) (t : Set F) :
convexHull R (s ×ˢ t) = convexHull R s ×ˢ convexHull R t :=
Subset.antisymm
(convexHull_min (prod_mono (subset_convexHull _ _) <| subset_convexHull _ _) <|
(convex_convexHull _ _).prod <| convex_convexHull _ _) <|
prod_subset_iff.2 fun _ hx _ => mk_mem_convexHull_prod hx
theorem convexHull_add (s t : Set E) : convexHull R (s + t) = convexHull R s + convexHull R t := by
simp_rw [← add_image_prod, ← IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_add.image_convexHull, convexHull_prod]
variable (R E)
/-- `convexHull` is an additive monoid morphism under pointwise addition. -/
@[simps]
def convexHullAddMonoidHom : Set E →+ Set E where
toFun := convexHull R
map_add' := convexHull_add
map_zero' := convexHull_zero
variable {R E}
theorem convexHull_sub (s t : Set E) : convexHull R (s - t) = convexHull R s - convexHull R t := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, convexHull_add, ← convexHull_neg]
theorem convexHull_list_sum (l : List (Set E)) : convexHull R l.sum = (l.map <| convexHull R).sum :=
map_list_sum (convexHullAddMonoidHom R E) l
theorem convexHull_multiset_sum (s : Multiset (Set E)) :
convexHull R s.sum = (s.map <| convexHull R).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (convexHullAddMonoidHom R E) s
theorem convexHull_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set E) :
convexHull R (∑ i ∈ s, t i) = ∑ i ∈ s, convexHull R (t i) :=
map_sum (convexHullAddMonoidHom R E) _ _
/-! ### `stdSimplex` -/
variable (ι) [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R}
/-- `stdSimplex 𝕜 ι` is the convex hull of the canonical basis in `ι → 𝕜`. -/
theorem convexHull_basis_eq_stdSimplex [DecidableEq ι] :
convexHull R (range fun i j : ι => if i = j then (1 : R) else 0) = stdSimplex R ι := by
refine Subset.antisymm (convexHull_min ?_ (convex_stdSimplex R ι)) ?_
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ite_eq_mem_stdSimplex R i
· rintro w ⟨hw₀, hw₁⟩
rw [pi_eq_sum_univ w, ← Finset.univ.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hw₁]
exact Finset.univ.centerMass_mem_convexHull (fun i _ => hw₀ i) (hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)
fun i _ => mem_range_self i
variable {ι}
/-- The convex hull of a finite set is the image of the standard simplex in `s → ℝ`
under the linear map sending each function `w` to `∑ x ∈ s, w x • x`.
Since we have no sums over finite sets, we use sum over `@Finset.univ _ hs.fintype`.
The map is defined in terms of operations on `(s → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ` so that later we will not need
to prove that this map is linear. -/
theorem Set.Finite.convexHull_eq_image {s : Set E} (hs : s.Finite) : convexHull R s =
haveI := hs.fintype
(⇑(∑ x : s, (@LinearMap.proj R s _ (fun _ => R) _ _ x).smulRight x.1)) '' stdSimplex R s := by
classical
letI := hs.fintype
rw [← convexHull_basis_eq_stdSimplex, LinearMap.image_convexHull, ← Set.range_comp]
apply congr_arg
simp_rw [Function.comp_def]
convert Subtype.range_coe.symm
simp [LinearMap.sum_apply, ite_smul, Finset.filter_eq, Finset.mem_univ]
/-- All values of a function `f ∈ stdSimplex 𝕜 ι` belong to `[0, 1]`. -/
theorem mem_Icc_of_mem_stdSimplex (hf : f ∈ stdSimplex R ι) (x) : f x ∈ Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
⟨hf.1 x, hf.2 ▸ Finset.single_le_sum (fun y _ => hf.1 y) (Finset.mem_univ x)⟩
/-- The convex hull of an affine basis is the intersection of the half-spaces defined by the
corresponding barycentric coordinates. -/
theorem AffineBasis.convexHull_eq_nonneg_coord {ι : Type*} (b : AffineBasis ι R E) :
convexHull R (range b) = { x | ∀ i, 0 ≤ b.coord i x } := by
rw [convexHull_range_eq_exists_affineCombination]
ext x
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨s, w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩ i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· rw [b.coord_apply_combination_of_mem hi hw₁]
exact hw₀ i hi
· rw [b.coord_apply_combination_of_not_mem hi hw₁]
· have hx' : x ∈ affineSpan R (range b) := by
rw [b.tot]
exact AffineSubspace.mem_top R E x
obtain ⟨s, w, hw₁, rfl⟩ := (mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination R E).mp hx'
refine ⟨s, w, ?_, hw₁, rfl⟩
intro i hi
specialize hx i
rw [b.coord_apply_combination_of_mem hi hw₁] at hx
exact hx
variable {s t t₁ t₂ : Finset E}
/-- Two simplices glue nicely if the union of their vertices is affine independent. -/
lemma AffineIndependent.convexHull_inter (hs : AffineIndependent R ((↑) : s → E))
(ht₁ : t₁ ⊆ s) (ht₂ : t₂ ⊆ s) :
convexHull R (t₁ ∩ t₂ : Set E) = convexHull R t₁ ∩ convexHull R t₂ := by
classical
refine (Set.subset_inter (convexHull_mono inf_le_left) <|
convexHull_mono inf_le_right).antisymm ?_
simp_rw [Set.subset_def, mem_inter_iff, Set.inf_eq_inter, ← coe_inter, mem_convexHull']
rintro x ⟨⟨w₁, h₁w₁, h₂w₁, h₃w₁⟩, w₂, -, h₂w₂, h₃w₂⟩
let w (x : E) : R := (if x ∈ t₁ then w₁ x else 0) - if x ∈ t₂ then w₂ x else 0
have h₁w : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 := by simp [w, Finset.inter_eq_right.2, *]
replace hs := hs.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype h₁w <| by
simp only [w, sub_smul, zero_smul, ite_smul, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ← Finset.sum_filter, h₃w₁,
Finset.filter_mem_eq_inter, Finset.inter_eq_right.2 ht₁, Finset.inter_eq_right.2 ht₂, h₃w₂,
sub_self]
have ht (x) (hx₁ : x ∈ t₁) (hx₂ : x ∉ t₂) : w₁ x = 0 := by
simpa [w, hx₁, hx₂] using hs _ (ht₁ hx₁)
refine ⟨w₁, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [and_imp, Finset.mem_inter]
exact fun y hy₁ _ ↦ h₁w₁ y hy₁
all_goals
· rwa [sum_subset inter_subset_left]
rintro x
simp_intro hx₁ hx₂
simp [ht x hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Two simplices glue nicely if the union of their vertices is affine independent.
Note that `AffineIndependent.convexHull_inter` should be more versatile in most use cases. -/
lemma AffineIndependent.convexHull_inter' [DecidableEq E]
(hs : AffineIndependent R ((↑) : ↑(t₁ ∪ t₂) → E)) :
convexHull R (t₁ ∩ t₂ : Set E) = convexHull R t₁ ∩ convexHull R t₂ :=
hs.convexHull_inter subset_union_left subset_union_right
end
section pi
| variable {𝕜 ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[Π i, AddCommGroup (E i)] [Π i, Module 𝕜 (E i)] {s : Set ι} {t : Π i, Set (E i)} {x : Π i, E i}
open Finset Fintype
lemma mem_convexHull_pi (h : ∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (t i)) : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (s.pi t) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
wlog hs : s = Set.univ generalizing s t
· rw [← pi_univ_ite]
refine this (fun i _ ↦ ?_) rfl
split_ifs with hi
· exact h i hi
· simp
subst hs
simp only [Set.mem_univ, mem_convexHull_iff_exists_fintype, true_implies, Set.mem_pi] at h
choose κ _ w f hw₀ hw₁ hft hf using h
refine mem_convexHull_of_exists_fintype (fun k : Π i, κ i ↦ ∏ i, w i (k i)) (fun g i ↦ f _ (g i))
(fun g ↦ prod_nonneg fun _ _ ↦ hw₀ _ _) ?_ (fun _ _ _ ↦ hft _ _) ?_
· rw [← Fintype.prod_sum]
exact prod_eq_one fun _ _ ↦ hw₁ _
ext i
calc
_ = ∑ g : ∀ i, κ i, (∏ i, w i (g i)) • f i (g i) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Combination.lean | 562 | 585 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `LinearMap.toMatrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `Matrix κ ι R`
* `Matrix.toLin`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`
to `Matrix m n R` (with the standard basis on `m → R` and `n → R`)
* `Matrix.toLin'`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix'`
* `algEquivMatrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `Matrix n n R`
## Issues
This file was originally written without attention to non-commutative rings,
and so mostly only works in the commutative setting. This should be fixed.
In particular, `Matrix.mulVec` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R)`
while `Matrix.vecMul` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`.
At present, the first equivalence is developed in detail but only for commutative rings
(and we omit the distinction between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`),
while the second equivalence is developed only in brief, but for not-necessarily-commutative rings.
Naming is slightly inconsistent between the two developments.
In the original (commutative) development `linear` is abbreviated to `lin`,
although this is not consistent with the rest of mathlib.
In the new (non-commutative) development `linear` is not abbreviated, and declarations use `_right`
to indicate they use the right action of matrices on vectors (via `Matrix.vecMul`).
When the two developments are made uniform, the names should be made uniform, too,
by choosing between `linear` and `lin` consistently,
and (presumably) adding `_left` where necessary.
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
section ToMatrixRight
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.vecMul M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) : (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R where
toFun x := x ᵥ* M
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ add_dotProduct _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ smul_dotProduct _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) (x : m → R) :
M.vecMulLinear x = x ᵥ* M := rfl
theorem Matrix.coe_vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.vecMulLinear : _ → _) = M.vecMul := rfl
variable [Fintype m]
theorem range_vecMulLinear (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.vecMulLinear = span R (range M.row) := by
letI := Classical.decEq m
simp_rw [range_eq_map, ← iSup_range_single, Submodule.map_iSup, range_eq_map, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span, image_image, image_singleton,
Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply, iSup_span, range_eq_iUnion, iUnion_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.single, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, row_def]
unfold vecMul
simp_rw [single_dotProduct, one_mul]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff {R : Type*} [Ring R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.vecMul ↔ LinearIndependent R M.row := by
rw [← coe_vecMulLinear]
simp only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff,
LinearMap.mem_ker, vecMulLinear_apply, row_def]
refine ⟨fun h c h0 ↦ congr_fun <| h c ?_, fun h c h0 ↦ funext <| h c ?_⟩
· rw [← h0]
ext i
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
· rw [← h0]
ext j
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_rows_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [Ring R] {A : Matrix m m R}
[DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) : LinearIndependent R A.row := by
rw [← Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.vecMul_injective_of_isUnit ha
section
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- Linear maps `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to `Matrix m n R`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication.
-/
def LinearMap.toMatrixRight' : ((m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] Matrix m n R where
toFun f i j := f (single R (fun _ ↦ R) i 1) j
invFun := Matrix.vecMulLinear
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R m).ext
intro j; ext i
simp
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to a linear map `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication. -/
abbrev Matrix.toLinearMapRight' [DecidableEq m] : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm LinearMap.toMatrixRight'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : m → R) :
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight') M v = v ᵥ* M := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) =
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N).comp (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _x ↦ (vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) (x) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) x =
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M x) :=
(vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (1 : Matrix m m R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp [Module.End.one_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `n → A`
and `m → A` corresponding to `M.vecMul` and `M'.vecMul`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinearEquivRight'OfInv [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n R}
{M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] m → R :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrixRight'.symm M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply] }
end
end ToMatrixRight
/-!
From this point on, we only work with commutative rings,
and fail to distinguish between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`.
This should eventually be remedied.
-/
section mulVec
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.mulVec M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R where
toFun := M.mulVec
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_add _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_smul _ _ _
theorem Matrix.coe_mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.mulVecLin : _ → _) = M.mulVec := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_apply [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
M.mulVecLin v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_zero [Fintype n] : Matrix.mulVecLin (0 : Matrix m n R) = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext zero_mulVec
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_add [Fintype n] (M N : Matrix m n R) :
(M + N).mulVecLin = M.mulVecLin + N.mulVecLin :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ add_mulVec _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_transpose [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.mulVecLin = M.vecMulLinear := by
ext; simp [mulVec_transpose]
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_transpose [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.vecMulLinear = M.mulVecLin := by
ext; simp [vecMul_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(M.submatrix f₁ e₂).mulVecLin = funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ submatrix_mulVec_equiv _ _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(reindex e₁ e₂ M).mulVecLin =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ
M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ ↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
variable [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_one [DecidableEq n] :
Matrix.mulVecLin (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext; simp [Matrix.one_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_mul [Fintype m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.mulVecLin (M * N) = (Matrix.mulVecLin M).comp (Matrix.mulVecLin N) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ (mulVec_mulVec _ _ _).symm
theorem Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix m n R} :
(LinearMap.ker M.mulVecLin) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 := by
simp only [Submodule.eq_bot_iff, LinearMap.mem_ker, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply]
theorem Matrix.range_mulVecLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.mulVecLin = span R (range M.col) := by
rw [← vecMulLinear_transpose, range_vecMulLinear, row_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.mulVec ↔ LinearIndependent R M.col := by
change Function.Injective (fun x ↦ _) ↔ _
simp_rw [← M.vecMul_transpose, vecMul_injective_iff, row_transpose]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_cols_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Fintype m]
{A : Matrix m m R} [DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) :
LinearIndependent R A.col := by
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.mulVec_injective_of_isUnit ha
end mulVec
section ToMatrix'
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)` are linearly equivalent to `Matrix m n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R where
toFun f := of fun i j ↦ f (Pi.single j 1) i
invFun := Matrix.mulVecLin
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.mulVec_single_one, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R n).ext
intro j; ext i
simp only [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single_one,
Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, of_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, of_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`.
Note that the forward-direction does not require `DecidableEq` and is `Matrix.vecMulLin`. -/
def Matrix.toLin' : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply' (M : Matrix m n R) : Matrix.toLin' M = M.mulVecLin :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_symm :
(Matrix.toLin'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) : LinearMap.toMatrix' (Matrix.toLin' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLin'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, of_apply]
congr! with i
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, Pi.single_eq_same]
apply Pi.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) : Matrix.toLin' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_one : Matrix.toLin' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_id : LinearMap.toMatrix' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 := by
ext
rw [Matrix.one_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply, id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_one : LinearMap.toMatrix' (1 : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M * N) = (Matrix.toLin' M).comp (Matrix.toLin' N) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_submatrix [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M.submatrix f₁ e₂) =
funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.toLin'_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_reindex [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (reindex e₁ e₂ M) =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex _ _ _
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin'_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply` -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin' (M * N) x = Matrix.toLin' M (Matrix.toLin' N x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, LinearMap.comp_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R)
(g : (l → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f.comp g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g := by
suffices f.comp g = Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g) by
rw [this, LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin']
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix', Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix']
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (f g : (m → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp f g
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (algebraMap R (Module.End R (n → R)) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem Matrix.ker_toLin'_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
LinearMap.ker (Matrix.toLin' M) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 :=
Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff
theorem Matrix.range_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range (Matrix.toLin' M) = span R (range M.col) :=
Matrix.range_mulVecLin _
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `m → A`
and `n → A` corresponding to `M.mulVec` and `M'.mulVec`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLin'OfInv [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R}
(hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R :=
{ Matrix.toLin' M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLin' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLin' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply] }
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are algebra equivalent to `Matrix n n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv LinearMap.toMatrix' LinearMap.toMatrix'_one LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul
/-- A `Matrix n n R` is algebra equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_toLinAlgEquiv' (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv']
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_apply (M : Matrix n n R) (v : n → R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_one : Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.toLin'_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_id :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_comp (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp _ _
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_mul (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f * g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_comp f g
end ToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
section Finite
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*} [Fintype n] [Finite m] [DecidableEq n]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable (v₁ : Basis n R M₁) (v₂ : Basis m R M₂)
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂` and matrices over `R` indexed by the bases. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R :=
LinearEquiv.trans (LinearEquiv.arrowCongr v₁.equivFun v₂.equivFun) LinearMap.toMatrix'
/-- `LinearMap.toMatrix'` is a particular case of `LinearMap.toMatrix`, for the standard basis
`Pi.basisFun R n`. -/
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_eq_toMatrix' :
LinearMap.toMatrix (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R n) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between matrices over `R` indexed by the bases and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂`. -/
def Matrix.toLin : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂).symm
/-- `Matrix.toLin'` is a particular case of `Matrix.toLin`, for the standard basis
`Pi.basisFun R n`. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin_eq_toLin' : Matrix.toLin (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_symm : (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂).symm = Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_symm : (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂).symm = LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_toMatrix (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f) = f := by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_symm, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M) = M := by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply,
LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, Basis.equivFun_symm_apply, Finset.sum_eq_single j, if_pos rfl,
one_smul, Basis.equivFun_apply]
· intro j' _ hj'
rw [if_neg hj', zero_smul]
· intro hj
have := Finset.mem_univ j
contradiction
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext fun i ↦ f.toMatrix_apply _ _ i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_apply v₁ v₂ f i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply v₁ v₂ f j
/-- This will be a special case of `LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix`. -/
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_id : LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ id = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_one : LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ 1 = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_id v₁
@[simp]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_singleton {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] (f : R →ₗ[R] R) (i j : ι) :
f.toMatrix (.singleton ι R) (.singleton ι R) i j = f 1 := by
simp [toMatrix, Subsingleton.elim j default]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_one : Matrix.toLin v₁ v₁ 1 = LinearMap.id := by
rw [← LinearMap.toMatrix_id v₁, Matrix.toLin_toMatrix]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_reindexRange [DecidableEq M₁] (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (k : m) (i : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁.reindexRange v₂.reindexRange f ⟨v₂ k, Set.mem_range_self k⟩
⟨v₁ i, Set.mem_range_self i⟩ =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f k i := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Basis.reindexRange_self, Basis.reindexRange_repr]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (algebraMap R (Module.End R M₁) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, LinearMap.toMatrix_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_mulVec_repr (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (x : M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f *ᵥ v₁.repr x = v₂.repr (f x) := by
ext i
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix',
LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, v₂.equivFun_apply]
congr
exact v₁.equivFun.symm_apply_apply x
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_basis_equiv [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (b : Basis l R M₁)
(b' : Basis l R M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix b' b (b'.equiv b (Equiv.refl l) : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₁) = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_smulBasis_left {G} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M₁]
[SMulCommClass G R M₁] (g : G) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix (g • v₁) v₂ f =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (f ∘ₗ DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _ g) := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
dsimp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_smulBasis_right {G} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M₂]
[SMulCommClass G R M₂] (g : G) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ (g • v₂) f =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _ g⁻¹ ∘ₗ f) := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
dsimp
end Finite
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*} [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq n]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable (v₁ : Basis n R M₁) (v₂ : Basis m R M₂)
theorem Matrix.toLin_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : M₁) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M v = ∑ j, (M *ᵥ v₁.repr v) j • v₂ j :=
show v₂.equivFun.symm (Matrix.toLin' M (v₁.repr v)) = _ by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_apply, v₂.equivFun_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_self (M : Matrix m n R) (i : n) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₂ j := by
rw [Matrix.toLin_apply, Finset.sum_congr rfl fun j _hj ↦ ?_]
rw [Basis.repr_self, Matrix.mulVec, dotProduct, Finset.sum_eq_single i, Finsupp.single_eq_same,
mul_one]
· intro i' _ i'_ne
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne i'_ne.symm, mul_zero]
· intros
have := Finset.mem_univ i
contradiction
variable {M₃ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃] (v₃ : Basis l R M₃)
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_comp [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₃ (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₂ v₃ f * LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ g := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_comp _ v₂.equivFun,
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ f * LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ g := by
rw [Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₁ v₁ f g]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_pow (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (k : ℕ) :
(toMatrix v₁ v₁ f) ^ k = toMatrix v₁ v₁ (f ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ih, ← toMatrix_mul]
theorem Matrix.toLin_mul [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix l m R) (B : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₃ (A * B) = (Matrix.toLin v₂ v₃ A).comp (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ B) := by
apply (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₃).injective
haveI : DecidableEq l := fun _ _ ↦ Classical.propDecidable _
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₂ v₃]
repeat' rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin]
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply`. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin_mul_apply [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix l m R) (B : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin v₁ v₃ (A * B) x = (Matrix.toLin v₂ v₃ A) (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ B x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin_mul v₁ v₂, LinearMap.comp_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M` are each other's inverse matrices, `Matrix.toLin M` and `Matrix.toLin M'`
form a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinOfInv [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1)
(hM'M : M' * M = 1) : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M with
toFun := Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M
invFun := Matrix.toLin v₂ v₁ M'
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin_one, id_apply] }
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁` and square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁) (LinearMap.toMatrix_one v₁) (LinearMap.toMatrix_mul v₁)
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁).symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁).symm = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁).symm = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_toMatrixAlgEquiv (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f) = f := by
rw [← Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_toLinAlgEquiv (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ M) = M := by
rw [← Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm, AlgEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f i j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i := by
simp [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f)ᵀ j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext fun i ↦ f.toMatrix_apply _ _ i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (i j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f i j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply v₁ f i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f)ᵀ j = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_transpose_apply v₁ f j
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_apply (M : Matrix n n R) (v : M₁) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ M v = ∑ j, (M *ᵥ v₁.repr v) j • v₁ j :=
show v₁.equivFun.symm (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M (v₁.repr v)) = _ by
rw [Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_apply, v₁.equivFun_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_self (M : Matrix n n R) (i : n) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₁ j :=
Matrix.toLin_self _ _ _ _
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_id : LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ id = 1 := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv, AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_id]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_one : Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ 1 = LinearMap.id := by
rw [← LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_id v₁, Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_toMatrixAlgEquiv]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_reindexRange [DecidableEq M₁] (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (k i : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁.reindexRange f
⟨v₁ k, Set.mem_range_self k⟩ ⟨v₁ i, Set.mem_range_self i⟩ =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f k i := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_apply, Basis.reindexRange_self, Basis.reindexRange_repr]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_comp (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ g := by
simp [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₁ v₁ f g]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ (f * g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ g := by
rw [Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_comp v₁ f g]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_mul (A B : Matrix n n R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ (A * B) =
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ A).comp (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ B) := by
convert Matrix.toLin_mul v₁ v₁ v₁ A B
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_finTwoProd_apply (a b c d : R) (x : R × R) :
Matrix.toLin (Basis.finTwoProd R) (Basis.finTwoProd R) !![a, b; c, d] x =
(a * x.fst + b * x.snd, c * x.fst + d * x.snd) := by
simp [Matrix.toLin_apply, Matrix.mulVec, dotProduct]
theorem Matrix.toLin_finTwoProd (a b c d : R) :
Matrix.toLin (Basis.finTwoProd R) (Basis.finTwoProd R) !![a, b; c, d] =
(a • LinearMap.fst R R R + b • LinearMap.snd R R R).prod
(c • LinearMap.fst R R R + d • LinearMap.snd R R R) :=
LinearMap.ext <| Matrix.toLin_finTwoProd_apply _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_distrib_mul_action_toLinearMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M₁ x) =
Matrix.diagonal fun _ ↦ x := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, DistribMulAction.toLinearMap_apply, LinearEquiv.map_smul,
Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single_one, Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, Matrix.diagonal_apply,
Pi.single_apply]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_prodMap [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq (n ⊕ m)]
(φ₁ : Module.End R M₁) (φ₂ : Module.End R M₂) :
toMatrix (v₁.prod v₂) (v₁.prod v₂) (φ₁.prodMap φ₂) =
Matrix.fromBlocks (toMatrix v₁ v₁ φ₁) 0 0 (toMatrix v₂ v₂ φ₂) := by
ext (i|i) (j|j) <;> simp [toMatrix]
end ToMatrix
namespace Algebra
section Lmul
variable {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable {m : Type*} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (b : Basis m R S)
theorem toMatrix_lmul' (x : S) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrix b b (lmul R S x) i j = b.repr (x * b j) i := by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply', coe_lmul_eq_mul, LinearMap.mul_apply']
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_lsmul (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix b b (Algebra.lsmul R R S x) = Matrix.diagonal fun _ ↦ x :=
| toMatrix_distrib_mul_action_toLinearMap b x
/-- `leftMulMatrix b x` is the matrix corresponding to the linear map `fun y ↦ x * y`.
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLin.lean | 797 | 800 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
/-!
# Specific subobjects
We define `equalizerSubobject`, `kernelSubobject` and `imageSubobject`, which are the subobjects
represented by the equalizer, kernel and image of (a pair of) morphism(s) and provide conditions
for `P.factors f`, where `P` is one of these special subobjects.
TODO: Add conditions for when `P` is a pullback subobject.
TODO: an iff characterisation of `(imageSubobject f).Factors h`
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
section Equalizer
variable (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasEqualizer f g]
/-- The equalizer of morphisms `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev equalizerSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (equalizer.ι f g)
/-- The underlying object of `equalizerSubobject f g` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `equalizer f g`. -/
def equalizerSubobjectIso : (equalizerSubobject f g : C) ≅ equalizer f g :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (equalizer.ι f g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).hom ≫ equalizer.ι f g = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow' :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).inv ≫ (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow = equalizer.ι f g := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp :
(equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ f = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ g := by
rw [← equalizerSubobject_arrow, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, equalizer.condition]
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h :=
⟨equalizer.lift h w, by simp⟩
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = h ≫ g :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp,
Category.assoc],
equalizerSubobject_factors f g h⟩
end Equalizer
section Kernel
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev kernelSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f)
/-- The underlying object of `kernelSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `kernel f`. -/
def kernelSubobjectIso : (kernelSubobject f : C) ≅ kernel f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (kernel.ι f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ kernel.ι f = (kernelSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow' :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = kernel.ι f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow_comp : (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [← kernelSubobject_arrow]
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.condition, comp_zero]
theorem kernelSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h :=
⟨kernel.lift _ h w, by simp⟩
theorem kernelSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = 0 :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, kernelSubobject_arrow_comp,
comp_zero],
kernelSubobject_factors f h⟩
/-- A factorisation of `h : W ⟶ X` through `kernelSubobject f`, assuming `h ≫ f = 0`. -/
def factorThruKernelSubobject {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernelSubobject f :=
(kernelSubobject f).factorThru h (kernelSubobject_factors f h w)
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_arrow {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = h := by
dsimp [factorThruKernelSubobject]
simp
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_kernelSubobjectIso {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso f).hom = kernel.lift f h w :=
(cancel_mono (kernel.ι f)).1 <| by simp
section
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} [HasKernel f']
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism between the kernel subobjects. -/
def kernelSubobjectMap (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
(kernelSubobject f : C) ⟶ (kernelSubobject f' : C) :=
Subobject.factorThru _ ((kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left)
(kernelSubobject_factors _ _ (by simp [sq.w]))
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_arrow (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobject f').arrow = (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left := by
simp [kernelSubobjectMap]
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_id : kernelSubobjectMap (𝟙 (Arrow.mk f)) = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_comp {X'' Y'' : C} {f'' : X'' ⟶ Y''} [HasKernel f'']
(sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') (sq' : Arrow.mk f' ⟶ Arrow.mk f'') :
kernelSubobjectMap (sq ≫ sq') = kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ kernelSubobjectMap sq' := by
aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
theorem kernel_map_comp_kernelSubobjectIso_inv (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernel.map f f' sq.1 sq.2 sq.3.symm ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).inv =
(kernelSubobjectIso _).inv ≫ kernelSubobjectMap sq := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
theorem kernelSubobjectIso_comp_kernel_map (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
(kernelSubobjectIso _).hom ≫ kernel.map f f' sq.1 sq.2 sq.3.symm =
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).hom := by
simp [← Iso.comp_inv_eq, kernel_map_comp_kernelSubobjectIso_inv]
end
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobject_zero {A B : C} : kernelSubobject (0 : A ⟶ B) = ⊤ :=
(isIso_iff_mk_eq_top _).mp (by infer_instance)
instance isIso_kernelSubobject_zero_arrow : IsIso (kernelSubobject (0 : X ⟶ Y)).arrow :=
(isIso_arrow_iff_eq_top _).mpr kernelSubobject_zero
theorem le_kernelSubobject (A : Subobject X) (h : A.arrow ≫ f = 0) : A ≤ kernelSubobject f :=
Subobject.le_mk_of_comm (kernel.lift f A.arrow h) (by simp)
/-- The isomorphism between the kernel of `f ≫ g` and the kernel of `g`,
when `f` is an isomorphism.
-/
def kernelSubobjectIsoComp {X' : C} (f : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel g] :
(kernelSubobject (f ≫ g) : C) ≅ (kernelSubobject g : C) :=
kernelSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ kernelIsIsoComp f g ≪≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).symm
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectIsoComp_hom_arrow {X' : C} (f : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel g] :
(kernelSubobjectIsoComp f g).hom ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow =
(kernelSubobject (f ≫ g)).arrow ≫ f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIsoComp]
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectIsoComp_inv_arrow {X' : C} (f : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel g] :
(kernelSubobjectIsoComp f g).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject (f ≫ g)).arrow =
(kernelSubobject g).arrow ≫ inv f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIsoComp]
/-- The kernel of `f` is always a smaller subobject than the kernel of `f ≫ h`. -/
theorem kernelSubobject_comp_le (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel (f ≫ h)] :
kernelSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject (f ≫ h) :=
le_kernelSubobject _ _ (by simp)
/-- Postcomposing by a monomorphism does not change the kernel subobject. -/
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobject_comp_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono h] :
kernelSubobject (f ≫ h) = kernelSubobject f :=
le_antisymm (le_kernelSubobject _ _ ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simp))) (kernelSubobject_comp_le f h)
instance kernelSubobject_comp_mono_isIso (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono h] :
IsIso (Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le f h)) := by
rw [ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm (kernelCompMono f h).inv]
· infer_instance
· simp
/-- Taking cokernels is an order-reversing map from the subobjects of `X` to the quotient objects
of `X`. -/
@[simps]
def cokernelOrderHom [HasCokernels C] (X : C) : Subobject X →o (Subobject (op X))ᵒᵈ where
toFun :=
Subobject.lift (fun _ f _ => Subobject.mk (cokernel.π f).op)
(by
rintro A B f g hf hg i rfl
refine Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ (Iso.op ?_) (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
· exact (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _)
(isCokernelEpiComp (colimit.isColimit _) i.hom rfl)).symm
· simp only [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Iso.op_hom, Iso.symm_hom, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op,
colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom, Cofork.ofπ_ι_app,
coequalizer.cofork_π])
monotone' :=
Subobject.ind₂ _ <| by
intro A B f g hf hg h
dsimp only [Subobject.lift_mk]
refine Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (cokernel.desc f (cokernel.π g) ?_).op ?_
· rw [← Subobject.ofMkLEMk_comp h, Category.assoc, cokernel.condition, comp_zero]
· exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (cokernel.π_desc _ _ _)
/-- Taking kernels is an order-reversing map from the quotient objects of `X` to the subobjects of
`X`. -/
@[simps]
def kernelOrderHom [HasKernels C] (X : C) : (Subobject (op X))ᵒᵈ →o Subobject X where
toFun :=
Subobject.lift (fun _ f _ => Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f.unop))
(by
rintro A B f g hf hg i rfl
refine Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _)
(isKernelCompMono (limit.isLimit (parallelPair g.unop 0)) i.unop.hom rfl)
· dsimp
simp only [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp,
Fork.ofι_π_app])
monotone' :=
Subobject.ind₂ _ <| by
intro A B f g hf hg h
dsimp only [Subobject.lift_mk]
refine Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (kernel.lift g.unop (kernel.ι f.unop) ?_) ?_
· rw [← Subobject.ofMkLEMk_comp h, unop_comp, kernel.condition_assoc, zero_comp]
· exact Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
end Kernel
section Image
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f]
/-- The image of a morphism `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject Y`. -/
abbrev imageSubobject : Subobject Y :=
Subobject.mk (image.ι f)
/-- The underlying object of `imageSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `image f`. -/
def imageSubobjectIso : (imageSubobject f : C) ≅ image f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (image.ι f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow :
(imageSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ image.ι f = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by simp [imageSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow' :
(imageSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (imageSubobject f).arrow = image.ι f := by simp [imageSubobjectIso]
/-- A factorisation of `f : X ⟶ Y` through `imageSubobject f`. -/
def factorThruImageSubobject : X ⟶ imageSubobject f :=
factorThruImage f ≫ (imageSubobjectIso f).inv
instance [HasEqualizers C] : Epi (factorThruImageSubobject f) := by
dsimp [factorThruImageSubobject]
apply epi_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow_comp : factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ (imageSubobject f).arrow = f := by
simp [factorThruImageSubobject, imageSubobject_arrow]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow_comp_eq_zero [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
[HasImage f] [Epi (factorThruImageSubobject f)] (h : f ≫ g = 0) :
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ g = 0 :=
zero_of_epi_comp (factorThruImageSubobject f) <| by simp [h]
theorem imageSubobject_factors_comp_self {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) : (imageSubobject f).Factors (k ≫ f) :=
⟨k ≫ factorThruImage f, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_self {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h) :
(imageSubobject f).factorThru (k ≫ f) h = k ≫ factorThruImageSubobject f := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_self_assoc {W W' : C} (k : W ⟶ W') (k' : W' ⟶ X) (h) :
(imageSubobject f).factorThru (k ≫ k' ≫ f) h = k ≫ k' ≫ factorThruImageSubobject f := by
ext
simp
/-- The image of `h ≫ f` is always a smaller subobject than the image of `f`. -/
theorem imageSubobject_comp_le {X' : C} (h : X' ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] [HasImage (h ≫ f)] :
imageSubobject (h ≫ f) ≤ imageSubobject f :=
Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (image.preComp h f) (by simp)
section
open ZeroObject
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroObject C]
@[simp]
theorem imageSubobject_zero_arrow : (imageSubobject (0 : X ⟶ Y)).arrow = 0 := by
rw [← imageSubobject_arrow]
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageSubobject_zero {A B : C} : imageSubobject (0 : A ⟶ B) = ⊥ :=
Subobject.eq_of_comm (imageSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ imageZero ≪≫ Subobject.botCoeIsoZero.symm) (by simp)
end
section
variable [HasEqualizers C]
/-- The morphism `imageSubobject (h ≫ f) ⟶ imageSubobject f`
is an epimorphism when `h` is an epimorphism.
In general this does not imply that `imageSubobject (h ≫ f) = imageSubobject f`,
although it will when the ambient category is abelian.
-/
instance imageSubobject_comp_le_epi_of_epi {X' : C} (h : X' ⟶ X) [Epi h] (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f]
[HasImage (h ≫ f)] : Epi (Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f)) := by
rw [ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm (image.preComp h f)]
· infer_instance
· simp
end
section
variable [HasEqualizers C]
/-- Postcomposing by an isomorphism gives an isomorphism between image subobjects. -/
def imageSubobjectCompIso (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] {Y' : C} (h : Y ⟶ Y') [IsIso h] :
(imageSubobject (f ≫ h) : C) ≅ (imageSubobject f : C) :=
imageSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ (image.compIso _ _).symm ≪≫ (imageSubobjectIso _).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobjectCompIso_hom_arrow (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] {Y' : C} (h : Y ⟶ Y') [IsIso h] :
(imageSubobjectCompIso f h).hom ≫ (imageSubobject f).arrow =
(imageSubobject (f ≫ h)).arrow ≫ inv h := by
simp [imageSubobjectCompIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobjectCompIso_inv_arrow (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] {Y' : C} (h : Y ⟶ Y') [IsIso h] :
(imageSubobjectCompIso f h).inv ≫ (imageSubobject (f ≫ h)).arrow =
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ h := by
simp [imageSubobjectCompIso]
end
theorem imageSubobject_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : imageSubobject f = Subobject.mk f :=
eq_of_comm (imageSubobjectIso f ≪≫ imageMonoIsoSource f ≪≫ (underlyingIso f).symm) (by simp)
/-- Precomposing by an isomorphism does not change the image subobject. -/
theorem imageSubobject_iso_comp [HasEqualizers C] {X' : C} (h : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso h] (f : X ⟶ Y)
[HasImage f] : imageSubobject (h ≫ f) = imageSubobject f :=
le_antisymm (imageSubobject_comp_le h f)
(Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (inv (image.preComp h f)) (by simp))
theorem imageSubobject_le {A B : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (h : A ⟶ X)
(w : h ≫ X.arrow = f) : imageSubobject f ≤ X :=
Subobject.le_of_comm
((imageSubobjectIso f).hom ≫
image.lift
{ I := (X : C)
e := h
m := X.arrow })
(by rw [assoc, image.lift_fac, imageSubobject_arrow])
theorem imageSubobject_le_mk {A B : C} {X : C} (g : X ⟶ B) [Mono g] (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f]
(h : A ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ g = f) : imageSubobject f ≤ Subobject.mk g :=
imageSubobject_le f (h ≫ (Subobject.underlyingIso g).inv) (by simp [w])
/-- Given a commutative square between morphisms `f` and `g`,
we have a morphism in the category from `imageSubobject f` to `imageSubobject g`. -/
def imageSubobjectMap {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ X} [HasImage f] {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasImage g]
(sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk g) [HasImageMap sq] :
(imageSubobject f : C) ⟶ (imageSubobject g : C) :=
(imageSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ image.map sq ≫ (imageSubobjectIso g).inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobjectMap_arrow {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ X} [HasImage f] {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasImage g]
(sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk g) [HasImageMap sq] :
imageSubobjectMap sq ≫ (imageSubobject g).arrow = (imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.right := by
simp only [imageSubobjectMap, Category.assoc, imageSubobject_arrow']
erw [image.map_ι, ← Category.assoc, imageSubobject_arrow]
theorem image_map_comp_imageSubobjectIso_inv {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ X} [HasImage f] {g : Y ⟶ Z}
[HasImage g] (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk g) [HasImageMap sq] :
image.map sq ≫ (imageSubobjectIso _).inv =
(imageSubobjectIso _).inv ≫ imageSubobjectMap sq := by
ext
simpa using image.map_ι sq
theorem imageSubobjectIso_comp_image_map {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ X} [HasImage f] {g : Y ⟶ Z}
[HasImage g] (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk g) [HasImageMap sq] :
(imageSubobjectIso _).hom ≫ image.map sq =
| imageSubobjectMap sq ≫ (imageSubobjectIso _).hom := by
erw [← Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, ← (imageSubobjectIso f).eq_inv_comp,
image_map_comp_imageSubobjectIso_inv sq]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Limits.lean | 419 | 422 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Norm
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 332 | 333 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
/-!
# Cast of integers (additional theorems)
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the integers into an additive group with a one (`Int.cast`).
There is also `Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas`,
which includes lemmas stated in terms of algebraic homomorphisms,
and results involving the order structure of `ℤ`.
By contrast, this file's only import beyond `Data.Int.Cast.Defs` is `Algebra.Group.Basic`.
-/
universe u
namespace Nat
variable {R : Type u} [AddGroupWithOne R]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_sub {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : ((n - m : ℕ) : R) = n - m :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by rw [← cast_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
-- `HasLiftT` appeared in the type signature
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_pred : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → ((n - 1 : ℕ) : R) = n - 1
| 0, h => by cases h
| n + 1, _ => by rw [cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
end Nat
open Nat
namespace Int
variable {R : Type u} [AddGroupWithOne R]
-- TODO: I don't like that `norm_cast` is used here, because it results in `norm_cast`
-- introducing the "implementation detail" `Int.negSucc`.
@[simp, norm_cast squash]
theorem cast_negSucc (n : ℕ) : (-[n+1] : R) = -(n + 1 : ℕ) :=
AddGroupWithOne.intCast_negSucc n
-- expected `n` to be implicit, and `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℤ) : R) = 0 :=
(AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat 0).trans Nat.cast_zero
-- type had `HasLiftT`
-- This lemma competes with `Int.ofNat_eq_natCast` to come later
@[simp high, nolint simpNF, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : R) = n :=
AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat _
-- expected `n` to be implicit, and `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℤ) : R) = ofNat(n) := by
simpa only [OfNat.ofNat] using AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat (R := R) n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one : ((1 : ℤ) : R) = 1 := by
rw [← Int.natCast_one, cast_natCast, Nat.cast_one]
-- type had `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_neg : ∀ n, ((-n : ℤ) : R) = -n
| (0 : ℕ) => by simp
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => by rw [cast_natCast, neg_ofNat_succ]; simp
| -[n+1] => by rw [Int.neg_negSucc, cast_natCast]; simp
-- type had `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_subNatNat (m n) : ((Int.subNatNat m n : ℤ) : R) = m - n := by
unfold subNatNat
cases e : n - m
· simp only [ofNat_eq_coe]
simp [e, Nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero e]
· rw [cast_negSucc, ← e, Nat.cast_sub <| _root_.le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e, neg_sub]
-- type had `HasLiftT`
@[simp]
theorem cast_negOfNat (n : ℕ) : ((negOfNat n : ℤ) : R) = -n := by simp [Int.cast_neg, negOfNat_eq]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add : ∀ m n, ((m + n : ℤ) : R) = m + n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by simp [← Int.natCast_add]
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] => by erw [cast_subNatNat, cast_natCast, cast_negSucc, sub_eq_add_neg]
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) => by
#adaptation_note
/-- `_root_` can be removed again after
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7359 lands in nightly-2025-03-06. -/
erw [cast_subNatNat, cast_natCast, cast_negSucc, _root_.sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_assoc,
eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq, ← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.add_comm]
| | -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Cast/Basic.lean | 105 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
/-! # sublists
`List.Sublists` gives a list of all (not necessarily contiguous) sublists of a list.
This file contains basic results on this function.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Nat
namespace List
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper definition for `sublists'` -/
def sublists'Aux (a : α) (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r₁.foldl (init := r₂) fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl (a : α) : ∀ (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = ((r₁.toArray).foldl (init := r₂.toArray)
(fun r l => r.push (a :: l))).toList := by
intro r₁ r₂
rw [sublists'Aux, Array.foldl_toList]
have := List.foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => r.push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]) (l := r₁) (init := r₂.toArray) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux (l : List α) :
sublists' l = l.foldr (fun a r => sublists'Aux a r r) [[]] := by
simp only [sublists', sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl]
rw [← List.foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_map (a : α) (r₁ : List (List α)) : ∀ (r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = r₂ ++ map (cons a) r₁ :=
List.reverseRecOn r₁ (fun _ => by simp [sublists'Aux]) fun r₁ l ih r₂ => by
rw [map_append, map_singleton, ← append_assoc, ← ih, sublists'Aux, foldl_append, foldl]
simp [sublists'Aux]
@[simp 900]
theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) := by
simp [sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux, foldr_cons, sublists'Aux_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublists' {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t := by
induction' t with a t IH generalizing s
· simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h], eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map]
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with (h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩)
· exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h
· exact h.cons_cons _
· obtain - | ⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : List α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
simp +arith only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l,
length_map, length, Nat.pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper function for `sublists` -/
def sublistsAux (a : α) (r : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r.foldl (init := []) fun r l => r ++ [l, a :: l]
theorem sublistsAux_eq_array_foldl :
sublistsAux = fun (a : α) (r : List (List α)) =>
(r.toArray.foldl (init := #[])
fun r l => (r.push l).push (a :: l)).toList := by
funext a r
simp only [sublistsAux, Array.foldl_toList, Array.mkEmpty]
have := foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => (r.push l).push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [l, a :: l]) (l := r) (init := #[]) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublistsAux_eq_flatMap :
sublistsAux = fun (a : α) (r : List (List α)) => r.flatMap fun l => [l, a :: l] :=
funext fun a => funext fun r =>
List.reverseRecOn r
(by simp [sublistsAux])
(fun r l ih => by
rw [flatMap_append, ← ih, flatMap_singleton, sublistsAux, foldl_append]
simp [sublistsAux])
@[csimp] theorem sublists_eq_sublistsFast : @sublists = @sublistsFast := by
ext α l : 2
trans l.foldr sublistsAux [[]]
· rw [sublistsAux_eq_flatMap, sublists]
· simp only [sublistsFast, sublistsAux_eq_array_foldl, Array.foldr_toList]
rw [← foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (sublists l₂) >>= (fun x => (sublists l₁).map (· ++ x)) := by
simp only [sublists, foldr_append]
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons a l₁ ih =>
rw [foldr_cons, ih]
simp [List.flatMap, flatten_flatten, Function.comp_def]
theorem sublists_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists (a :: l) = sublists l >>= (fun x => [x, a :: x]) :=
show sublists ([a] ++ l) = _ by
rw [sublists_append]
simp only [sublists_singleton, map_cons, bind_eq_flatMap, nil_append, cons_append, map_nil]
@[simp]
theorem sublists_concat (l : List α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (fun x => x ++ [a]) (sublists l) := by
rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_flatMap, flatMap_cons, flatMap_cons, flatMap_nil,
map_id'' append_nil, append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : List α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) := by
induction' l with hd tl ih <;> [rfl;
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_flatMap, map_map, flatMap_cons, append_nil, flatMap_nil,
Function.comp_def]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : List α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) := by
rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : List α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) := by
simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id'' reverse_reverse, Function.comp_def]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : List α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) := by
rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublists {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t := by
rw [← reverse_sublist, ← mem_sublists', sublists'_reverse,
mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp]
theorem length_sublists (l : List α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l := by
simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_pure_sublist_sublists (l : List α) : map pure l <+ sublists l := by
induction' l using reverseRecOn with l a ih <;> simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]
· simp only [sublists_nil, sublist_cons_self]
exact ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 <|
singleton_sublist.2 <| mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by rfl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 ih)
/-! ### sublistsLen -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
`f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublistsLenAux : ℕ → List α → (List α → β) → List β → List β
| 0, _, f, r => f [] :: r
| _ + 1, [], _, r => r
| n + 1, a :: l, f, r => sublistsLenAux (n + 1) l f (sublistsLenAux n l (f ∘ List.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
def sublistsLen (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : List (List α) :=
sublistsLenAux n l id []
theorem sublistsLenAux_append :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : List α) (f : List α → β) (g : β → γ) (r : List β) (s : List γ),
sublistsLenAux n l (g ∘ f) (r.map g ++ s) = (sublistsLenAux n l f r).map g ++ s
| 0, l, f, g, r, s => by unfold sublistsLenAux; simp
| _ + 1, [], _, _, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, a :: l, f, g, r, s => by
unfold sublistsLenAux
simp only [show (g ∘ f) ∘ List.cons a = g ∘ f ∘ List.cons a by rfl, sublistsLenAux_append,
sublistsLenAux_append]
theorem sublistsLenAux_eq (l : List α) (n) (f : List α → β) (r) :
sublistsLenAux n l f r = (sublistsLen n l).map f ++ r := by
rw [sublistsLen, ← sublistsLenAux_append]; rfl
theorem sublistsLenAux_zero (l : List α) (f : List α → β) (r) :
sublistsLenAux 0 l f r = f [] :: r := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublistsLen_zero (l : List α) : sublistsLen 0 l = [[]] :=
sublistsLenAux_zero _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sublistsLen_succ_nil (n) : sublistsLen (n + 1) (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublistsLen_succ_cons (n) (a : α) (l) :
sublistsLen (n + 1) (a :: l) = sublistsLen (n + 1) l ++ (sublistsLen n l).map (cons a) := by
rw [sublistsLen, sublistsLenAux, sublistsLenAux_eq, sublistsLenAux_eq, map_id,
append_nil]; rfl
theorem sublistsLen_one (l : List α) : sublistsLen 1 l = l.reverse.map ([·]) :=
l.rec (by rw [sublistsLen_succ_nil, reverse_nil, map_nil]) fun a s ih ↦ by
rw [sublistsLen_succ_cons, ih, reverse_cons, map_append, sublistsLen_zero]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_sublistsLen :
∀ (n) (l : List α), length (sublistsLen n l) = Nat.choose (length l) n
| 0, l => by simp
| _ + 1, [] => by simp
| n + 1, a :: l => by
rw [sublistsLen_succ_cons, length_append, length_sublistsLen (n+1) l,
length_map, length_sublistsLen n l, length_cons, Nat.choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_comm]
theorem sublistsLen_sublist_sublists' :
∀ (n) (l : List α), sublistsLen n l <+ sublists' l
| 0, l => by simp
| _ + 1, [] => nil_sublist _
| n + 1, a :: l => by
rw [sublistsLen_succ_cons, sublists'_cons]
exact (sublistsLen_sublist_sublists' _ _).append ((sublistsLen_sublist_sublists' _ _).map _)
theorem sublistsLen_sublist_of_sublist (n) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) :
sublistsLen n l₁ <+ sublistsLen n l₂ := by
induction' n with n IHn generalizing l₁ l₂; · simp
induction h with
| slnil => rfl
| cons a _ IH =>
refine IH.trans ?_
rw [sublistsLen_succ_cons]
apply sublist_append_left
| cons₂ a s IH => simpa only [sublistsLen_succ_cons] using IH.append ((IHn s).map _)
theorem length_of_sublistsLen :
∀ {n} {l l' : List α}, l' ∈ sublistsLen n l → length l' = n
| 0, l, l', h => by simp_all
| n + 1, a :: l, l', h => by
rw [sublistsLen_succ_cons, mem_append, mem_map] at h
rcases h with (h | ⟨l', h, rfl⟩)
· exact length_of_sublistsLen h
· exact congr_arg (· + 1) (length_of_sublistsLen h)
theorem mem_sublistsLen_self {l l' : List α} (h : l' <+ l) :
l' ∈ sublistsLen (length l') l := by
induction h with
| slnil => simp
| @cons l₁ l₂ a s IH =>
rcases l₁ with - | ⟨b, l₁⟩
· simp
· rw [length, sublistsLen_succ_cons]
exact mem_append_left _ IH
| cons₂ a s IH =>
rw [length, sublistsLen_succ_cons]
exact mem_append_right _ (mem_map.2 ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublistsLen {n} {l l' : List α} :
l' ∈ sublistsLen n l ↔ l' <+ l ∧ length l' = n :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨mem_sublists'.1 ((sublistsLen_sublist_sublists' _ _).subset h), length_of_sublistsLen h⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_sublistsLen_self h₁⟩
theorem sublistsLen_of_length_lt {n} {l : List α} (h : l.length < n) : sublistsLen n l = [] :=
eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ =>
mem_sublistsLen.not.mpr fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ => (h.trans_eq hl.symm).not_le (Sublist.length_le hs)
@[simp]
theorem sublistsLen_length : ∀ l : List α, sublistsLen l.length l = [l]
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
simp only [length, sublistsLen_succ_cons, sublistsLen_length, map,
sublistsLen_of_length_lt (lt_succ_self _), nil_append]
open Function
theorem Pairwise.sublists' {R} :
∀ {l : List α}, Pairwise R l → Pairwise (Lex (swap R)) (sublists' l)
| _, Pairwise.nil => pairwise_singleton _ _
| _, @Pairwise.cons _ _ a l H₁ H₂ => by
simp only [sublists'_cons, pairwise_append, pairwise_map, mem_sublists', mem_map, exists_imp,
and_imp]
refine ⟨H₂.sublists', H₂.sublists'.imp fun l₁ => Lex.cons l₁, ?_⟩
rintro l₁ sl₁ x l₂ _ rfl
rcases l₁ with - | ⟨b, l₁⟩; · constructor
exact Lex.rel (H₁ _ <| sl₁.subset mem_cons_self)
theorem pairwise_sublists {R} {l : List α} (H : Pairwise R l) :
Pairwise (Lex R on reverse) (sublists l) := by
have := (pairwise_reverse.2 H).sublists'
rwa [sublists'_reverse, pairwise_map] at this
@[simp]
theorem nodup_sublists {l : List α} : Nodup (sublists l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨fun h => (h.sublist (map_pure_sublist_sublists _)).of_map _, fun h =>
(pairwise_sublists h).imp @fun l₁ l₂ h => by simpa using h.to_ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem nodup_sublists' {l : List α} : Nodup (sublists' l) ↔ Nodup l := by
rw [sublists'_eq_sublists, nodup_map_iff reverse_injective, nodup_sublists, nodup_reverse]
protected alias ⟨Nodup.of_sublists, Nodup.sublists⟩ := nodup_sublists
protected alias ⟨Nodup.of_sublists', _⟩ := nodup_sublists'
theorem nodup_sublistsLen (n : ℕ) {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) : (sublistsLen n l).Nodup := by
have : Pairwise (· ≠ ·) l.sublists' := Pairwise.imp
(fun h => Lex.to_ne (by convert h using 3; simp [swap, eq_comm])) h.sublists'
exact this.sublist (sublistsLen_sublist_sublists' _ _)
theorem sublists_map (f : α → β) : ∀ (l : List α),
sublists (map f l) = map (map f) (sublists l)
| [] => by simp
| a::l => by
rw [map_cons, sublists_cons, bind_eq_flatMap, sublists_map f l, sublists_cons,
bind_eq_flatMap, map_eq_flatMap, map_eq_flatMap]
induction sublists l <;> simp [*]
theorem sublists'_map (f : α → β) : ∀ (l : List α),
sublists' (map f l) = map (map f) (sublists' l)
| [] => by simp
| a::l => by simp [map_cons, sublists'_cons, sublists'_map f l, Function.comp]
theorem sublists_perm_sublists' (l : List α) : sublists l ~ sublists' l := by
rw [← finRange_map_get l, sublists_map, sublists'_map]
apply Perm.map
apply (perm_ext_iff_of_nodup _ _).mpr
· simp
· exact nodup_sublists.mpr (nodup_finRange _)
· exact (nodup_sublists'.mpr (nodup_finRange _))
theorem sublists_cons_perm_append (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists (a :: l) ~ sublists l ++ map (cons a) (sublists l) :=
Perm.trans (sublists_perm_sublists' _) <| by
rw [sublists'_cons]
exact Perm.append (sublists_perm_sublists' _).symm (Perm.map _ (sublists_perm_sublists' _).symm)
theorem revzip_sublists (l : List α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, (l₁, l₂) ∈ revzip l.sublists → l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l := by
rw [revzip]
induction' l using List.reverseRecOn with l' a ih
· intro l₁ l₂ h
simp? at h says
simp only [sublists_nil, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_nil_right,
mem_cons, Prod.mk.injEq, not_mem_nil, or_false] at h
simp [h]
· intro l₁ l₂ h
rw [sublists_concat, reverse_append, zip_append (by simp), ← map_reverse, zip_map_right,
zip_map_left] at *
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, mem_map, mem_append, Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with (⟨l₁, l₂', h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁', l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩)
· rw [← append_assoc]
exact (ih _ _ h).append_right _
· rw [append_assoc]
apply (perm_append_comm.append_left _).trans
rw [← append_assoc]
exact (ih _ _ h).append_right _
theorem revzip_sublists' (l : List α) : ∀ l₁ l₂, (l₁, l₂) ∈ revzip l.sublists' → l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l := by
rw [revzip]
induction' l with a l IH <;> intro l₁ l₂ h
· simp_all only [sublists'_nil, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, zip_cons_cons,
zip_nil_right, mem_singleton, Prod.mk.injEq, append_nil, Perm.refl]
· rw [sublists'_cons, reverse_append, zip_append, ← map_reverse, zip_map_right, zip_map_left] at *
<;> [simp only [mem_append, mem_map, Prod.map_apply, id_eq, Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.exists,
exists_eq_right_right] at h; simp]
rcases h with (⟨l₁, l₂', h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁', h, rfl⟩)
· exact perm_middle.trans ((IH _ _ h).cons _)
· exact (IH _ _ h).cons _
theorem range_bind_sublistsLen_perm (l : List α) :
((List.range (l.length + 1)).flatMap fun n => sublistsLen n l) ~ sublists' l := by
induction' l with h tl l_ih
· simp [range_succ]
· simp_rw [range_succ_eq_map, length, flatMap_cons, flatMap_map, sublistsLen_succ_cons,
sublists'_cons, List.sublistsLen_zero, List.singleton_append]
refine ((flatMap_append_perm (range (tl.length + 1)) _ _).symm.cons _).trans ?_
simp_rw [← List.map_flatMap, ← cons_append]
rw [← List.singleton_append, ← List.sublistsLen_zero tl]
refine Perm.append ?_ (l_ih.map _)
rw [List.range_succ, flatMap_append, flatMap_singleton,
sublistsLen_of_length_lt (Nat.lt_succ_self _), append_nil,
| ← List.flatMap_map Nat.succ fun n => sublistsLen n tl,
← flatMap_cons (f := fun n => sublistsLen n tl), ← range_succ_eq_map]
exact l_ih
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sublists.lean | 405 | 411 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Sign function
This file defines the sign function for types with zero and a decidable less-than relation, and
proves some basic theorems about it.
-/
-- Don't generate unnecessary `sizeOf_spec` lemmas which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- The type of signs. -/
inductive SignType
| zero
| neg
| pos
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
namespace SignType
instance : Zero SignType :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One SignType :=
⟨pos⟩
instance : Neg SignType :=
⟨fun s =>
match s with
| neg => pos
| zero => zero
| pos => neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_zero : zero = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_neg_one : neg = -1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pos_eq_one : pos = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Mul SignType :=
⟨fun x y =>
match x with
| neg => -y
| zero => zero
| pos => y⟩
/-- The less-than-or-equal relation on signs. -/
protected inductive LE : SignType → SignType → Prop
| of_neg (a) : SignType.LE neg a
| zero : SignType.LE zero zero
| of_pos (a) : SignType.LE a pos
instance : LE SignType :=
⟨SignType.LE⟩
instance LE.decidableRel : DecidableRel SignType.LE := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
instance decidableEq : DecidableEq SignType := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
private lemma mul_comm : ∀ (a b : SignType), a * b = b * a := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
private lemma mul_assoc : ∀ (a b c : SignType), (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
/- We can define a `Field` instance on `SignType`, but it's not mathematically sensible,
so we only define the `CommGroupWithZero`. -/
instance : CommGroupWithZero SignType where
zero := 0
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
inv := id
mul_zero a := by cases a <;> rfl
zero_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_one a := by cases a <;> rfl
one_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_inv_cancel a ha := by cases a <;> trivial
mul_comm := mul_comm
mul_assoc := mul_assoc
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by rintro ⟨_⟩⟩
inv_zero := rfl
private lemma le_antisymm (a b : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ a) : a = b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> trivial
private lemma le_trans (a b c : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> tauto
instance : LinearOrder SignType where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := by cases a <;> constructor
le_total a b := by cases a <;> cases b <;> first | left; constructor | right; constructor
le_antisymm := le_antisymm
le_trans := le_trans
toDecidableLE := LE.decidableRel
toDecidableEq := SignType.decidableEq
instance : BoundedOrder SignType where
top := 1
le_top := LE.of_pos
bot := -1
bot_le :=
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6053
Added `by exact`, but don't understand why it was needed. -/
by exact LE.of_neg
instance : HasDistribNeg SignType :=
{ neg_neg := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl
neg_mul := fun x y => by cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
mul_neg := fun x y => by cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl }
/-- `SignType` is equivalent to `Fin 3`. -/
def fin3Equiv : SignType ≃* Fin 3 where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 => ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 1 => ⟨1, by simp⟩
| -1 => ⟨2, by simp⟩
invFun a :=
match a with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => 0
| ⟨1, _⟩ => 1
| ⟨2, _⟩ => -1
left_inv a := by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv a :=
match a with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => by simp
| ⟨1, _⟩ => by simp
| ⟨2, _⟩ => by simp
map_mul' a b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
section CaseBashing
theorem nonneg_iff {a : SignType} : 0 ≤ a ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by decide +revert
theorem nonneg_iff_ne_neg_one {a : SignType} : 0 ≤ a ↔ a ≠ -1 := by decide +revert
theorem neg_one_lt_iff {a : SignType} : -1 < a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by decide +revert
theorem nonpos_iff {a : SignType} : a ≤ 0 ↔ a = -1 ∨ a = 0 := by decide +revert
theorem nonpos_iff_ne_one {a : SignType} : a ≤ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := by decide +revert
theorem lt_one_iff {a : SignType} : a < 1 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_iff {a : SignType} : a < 0 ↔ a = -1 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem le_neg_one_iff {a : SignType} : a ≤ -1 ↔ a = -1 :=
le_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem pos_iff {a : SignType} : 0 < a ↔ a = 1 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem one_le_iff {a : SignType} : 1 ≤ a ↔ a = 1 :=
top_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_le (a : SignType) : -1 ≤ a :=
bot_le
@[simp]
theorem le_one (a : SignType) : a ≤ 1 :=
le_top
@[simp]
theorem not_lt_neg_one (a : SignType) : ¬a < -1 :=
not_lt_bot
@[simp]
theorem not_one_lt (a : SignType) : ¬1 < a :=
not_top_lt
@[simp]
theorem self_eq_neg_iff (a : SignType) : a = -a ↔ a = 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff (a : SignType) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_lt_one : (-1 : SignType) < 1 :=
bot_lt_top
end CaseBashing
section cast
variable {α : Type*} [Zero α] [One α] [Neg α]
/-- Turn a `SignType` into zero, one, or minus one. This is a coercion instance. -/
@[coe]
def cast : SignType → α
| zero => 0
| pos => 1
| neg => -1
/-- This is a `CoeTail` since the type on the right (trivially) determines the type on the left.
`outParam`-wise it could be a `Coe`, but we don't want to try applying this instance for a
coercion to any `α`.
-/
instance : CoeTail SignType α :=
⟨cast⟩
/-- Casting out of `SignType` respects composition with functions preserving `0, 1, -1`. -/
lemma map_cast' {β : Type*} [One β] [Neg β] [Zero β]
(f : α → β) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (h₂ : f 0 = 0) (h₃ : f (-1) = -1) (s : SignType) :
f s = s := by
cases s <;> simp only [SignType.cast, h₁, h₂, h₃]
/-- Casting out of `SignType` respects composition with suitable bundled homomorphism types. -/
lemma map_cast {α β F : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] [One β] [SubtractionMonoid β]
[FunLike F α β] [AddMonoidHomClass F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (f : F) (s : SignType) :
f s = s := by
apply map_cast' <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : SignType) = (0 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : SignType) = (1 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : SignType) = (-1 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_neg {α : Type*} [One α] [SubtractionMonoid α] (s : SignType) :
(↑(-s) : α) = -↑s := by
cases s <;> simp
/-- Casting `SignType → ℤ → α` is the same as casting directly `SignType → α`. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_cast {α : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] (s : SignType) : ((s : ℤ) : α) = s :=
map_cast' _ Int.cast_one Int.cast_zero (@Int.cast_one α _ ▸ Int.cast_neg 1) _
end cast
/-- `SignType.cast` as a `MulWithZeroHom`. -/
@[simps]
def castHom {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α] : SignType →*₀ α where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [zero_eq_zero, pos_eq_one, neg_eq_neg_one]
theorem univ_eq : (Finset.univ : Finset SignType) = {0, -1, 1} := by
decide
theorem range_eq {α} (f : SignType → α) : Set.range f = {f zero, f neg, f pos} := by
classical rw [← Fintype.coe_image_univ, univ_eq]
classical simp [Finset.coe_insert]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a b : SignType) :
↑(a * b) = (a : α) * b :=
map_mul SignType.castHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow {α} [MonoidWithZero α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a : SignType) (k : ℕ) :
↑(a ^ k) = (a : α) ^ k :=
map_pow SignType.castHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zpow {α} [GroupWithZero α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a : SignType) (k : ℤ) :
↑(a ^ k) = (a : α) ^ k :=
map_zpow₀ SignType.castHom _ _
end SignType
-- The lemma `exists_signed_sum` needs explicit universe handling in its statement.
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open SignType
section Preorder
variable [Zero α] [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] {a : α}
/-- The sign of an element is 1 if it's positive, -1 if negative, 0 otherwise. -/
def SignType.sign : α →o SignType :=
⟨fun a => if 0 < a then 1 else if a < 0 then -1 else 0, fun a b h => by
dsimp
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ _ _ h₂ h₃ <;> try constructor
· cases lt_irrefl 0 (h₁.trans <| h.trans_lt h₃)
· cases h₂ (h₁.trans_le h)
· cases h₄ (h.trans_lt h₃)⟩
theorem sign_apply : sign a = ite (0 < a) 1 (ite (a < 0) (-1) 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : sign (0 : α) = 0 := by simp [sign_apply]
@[simp]
theorem sign_pos (ha : 0 < a) : sign a = 1 := by rwa [sign_apply, if_pos]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (ha : a < 0) : sign a = -1 := by rwa [sign_apply, if_neg <| asymm ha, if_pos]
theorem sign_eq_one_iff : sign a = 1 ↔ 0 < a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sign_pos h⟩
by_contra hn
rw [sign_apply, if_neg hn] at h
split_ifs at h
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_iff : sign a = -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sign_neg h⟩
rw [sign_apply] at h
split_ifs at h
assumption
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Zero α] [LinearOrder α] {a : α}
/-- `SignType.sign` respects strictly monotone zero-preserving maps. -/
lemma StrictMono.sign_comp {β F : Type*} [Zero β] [Preorder β] [DecidableLT β]
[FunLike F α β] [ZeroHomClass F α β] {f : F} (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) :
sign (f a) = sign a := by
simp only [sign_apply, ← map_zero f, hf.lt_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff : sign a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ sign_zero⟩
rw [sign_apply] at h
split_ifs at h with h_1 h_2
cases h
exact (le_of_not_lt h_1).eq_of_not_lt h_2
theorem sign_ne_zero : sign a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
sign_eq_zero_iff.not
| Mathlib/Data/Sign.lean | 354 | 354 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Divisor Finsets
This file defines sets of divisors of a natural number. This is particularly useful as background
for defining Dirichlet convolution.
## Main Definitions
Let `n : ℕ`. All of the following definitions are in the `Nat` namespace:
* `divisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`.
* `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`, other than `n`.
* `divisorsAntidiagonal n` is the `Finset` of pairs `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`.
* `Perfect n` is true when `n` is positive and the sum of `properDivisors n` is `n`.
## Conventions
Since `0` has infinitely many divisors, none of the definitions in this file make sense for it.
Therefore we adopt the convention that `Nat.divisors 0`, `Nat.properDivisors 0`,
`Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0` and `Int.divisorsAntidiag 0` are all `∅`.
## Tags
divisors, perfect numbers
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- `divisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`. By convention, we set `divisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def divisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1) | d ∣ n}
/-- `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`, other than `n`.
By convention, we set `properDivisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 n | d ∣ n}
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number as a finset.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonal` is the finset of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`.
By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅`.
O(n). -/
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(Icc 1 n).filterMap (fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
fun x₁ x₂ (x, y) hx₁ hx₂ ↦ by aesop
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number, as a list.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonalList` is the list of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`, ordered
by increasing `a`. By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = []`.
-/
def divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) : List (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(List.range' 1 n).filterMap
(fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n.succ | d ∣ n} = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n | d ∣ n} = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := x
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, mem_filterMap, mem_Icc, one_le_iff_ne_zero,
Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, Prod.ext_iff, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨han, ⟨ha, han'⟩, rfl⟩
simp [Nat.mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, han]
omega
· rintro ⟨rfl, hab⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hab
simpa [hab.1, hab.2] using Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ hab.2.bot_lt
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_zero : divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_one : divisorsAntidiagonalList 1 = [(1, 1)] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.toFinset = n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
rw [divisorsAntidiagonalList, divisorsAntidiagonal, List.toFinset_filterMap (f_inj := by aesop),
List.toFinset_range'_1_1]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.fst < ·.fst) := by
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap fun a b c d h h' ha => ?_
rw [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq] at h h'
simpa [← h.right, ← h'.right]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.snd > ·.snd) := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap ?_
simp only [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, gt_iff_lt, and_imp, Prod.forall,
Prod.mk.injEq]
rintro a b _ _ _ _ ha rfl rfl hb rfl rfl hab
rwa [Nat.div_lt_div_left hn ⟨_, hb.symm⟩ ⟨_, ha.symm⟩]
lemma nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} : n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Nodup :=
have : IsIrrefl (ℕ × ℕ) (·.fst < ·.fst) := ⟨by simp⟩
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.nodup
/-- The `Finset` and `List` versions agree by definition. -/
@[simp]
theorem val_divisorsAntidiagonal (n : ℕ) :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).val = divisorsAntidiagonalList n :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a.1 * a.2 = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
rw [← List.mem_toFinset, toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal]
@[simp high]
lemma swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a.swap ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList := by simp [mul_comm]
lemma reverse_divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.reverse = n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.map .swap := by
have : IsAsymm (ℕ × ℕ) (·.snd < ·.snd) := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ lt_asymm⟩
refine List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted ?_ sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd.reverse <|
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.map _ fun _ _ ↦ id
simp [List.reverse_perm', List.perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList
(nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList.map Prod.swap_injective), mul_comm]
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
rcases m with - | m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
theorem card_divisors_le_self (n : ℕ) : #n.divisors ≤ n := calc
_ ≤ #(Ico 1 (n + 1)) := by
apply card_le_card
simp only [divisors, filter_subset]
_ = n := by rw [card_Ico, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem divisors_subset_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) (hdiff : m ≠ n) :
divisors m ⊆ properDivisors n := by
apply Finset.subset_iff.2
intro x hx
exact
Nat.mem_properDivisors.2
⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.1 hx).1.trans h,
lt_of_le_of_lt (divisor_le hx)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (divisor_le (Nat.mem_divisors.2 ⟨h, hzero⟩)) hdiff)⟩
| lemma divisors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {n m : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ∣ n) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | d ∣ m} = m.divisors := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 220 | 221 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.PUnit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
/-!
# The category of monoids in a monoidal category.
We define monoids in a monoidal category `C` and show that the category of monoids is equivalent to
the category of lax monoidal functors from the unit monoidal category to `C`. We also show that if
`C` is braided, then the category of monoids is naturally monoidal.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂ u
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory Functor.LaxMonoidal Functor.OplaxMonoidal
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
/-- A monoid object internal to a monoidal category.
When the monoidal category is preadditive, this is also sometimes called an "algebra object".
-/
class Mon_Class (X : C) where
/-- The unit morphism of a monoid object. -/
one : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X
/-- The multiplication morphism of a monoid object. -/
mul : X ⊗ X ⟶ X
/- For the names of the conditions below, the unprimed names are reserved for the version where
the argument `X` is explicit. -/
one_mul' : one ▷ X ≫ mul = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
mul_one' : X ◁ one ≫ mul = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
-- Obviously there is some flexibility stating this axiom.
-- This one has left- and right-hand sides matching the statement of `Monoid.mul_assoc`,
-- and chooses to place the associator on the right-hand side.
-- The heuristic is that unitors and associators "don't have much weight".
mul_assoc' : (mul ▷ X) ≫ mul = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ (X ◁ mul) ≫ mul := by aesop_cat
namespace Mon_Class
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "μ" => Mon_Class.mul
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "μ["M"]" => Mon_Class.mul (X := M)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "η" => Mon_Class.one
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "η["M"]" => Mon_Class.one (X := M)
/- The simp attribute is reserved for the unprimed versions. -/
attribute [reassoc] one_mul' mul_one' mul_assoc'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem one_mul (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : η ▷ X ≫ μ = (λ_ X).hom := one_mul'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_one (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : X ◁ η ≫ μ = (ρ_ X).hom := mul_one'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_assoc (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : μ ▷ X ≫ μ = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ X ◁ μ ≫ μ := mul_assoc'
@[ext]
theorem ext {X : C} (h₁ h₂ : Mon_Class X) (H : h₁.mul = h₂.mul) : h₁ = h₂ := by
suffices h₁.one = h₂.one by cases h₁; cases h₂; subst H this; rfl
trans (λ_ _).inv ≫ (h₁.one ⊗ h₂.one) ≫ h₁.mul
· simp [tensorHom_def, H, ← unitors_equal]
· simp [tensorHom_def']
end Mon_Class
open scoped Mon_Class
variable {M N : C} [Mon_Class M] [Mon_Class N]
/-- The property that a morphism between monoid objects is a monoid morphism. -/
class IsMon_Hom (f : M ⟶ N) : Prop where
one_hom (f) : η ≫ f = η := by aesop_cat
mul_hom (f) : μ ≫ f = (f ⊗ f) ≫ μ := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsMon_Hom.one_hom IsMon_Hom.mul_hom
variable (C)
/-- A monoid object internal to a monoidal category.
When the monoidal category is preadditive, this is also sometimes called an "algebra object".
-/
structure Mon_ where
/-- The underlying object in the ambient monoidal category -/
X : C
/-- The unit morphism of the monoid object -/
one : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X
/-- The multiplication morphism of a monoid object -/
mul : X ⊗ X ⟶ X
one_mul : (one ▷ X) ≫ mul = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
mul_one : (X ◁ one) ≫ mul = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
-- Obviously there is some flexibility stating this axiom.
-- This one has left- and right-hand sides matching the statement of `Monoid.mul_assoc`,
-- and chooses to place the associator on the right-hand side.
-- The heuristic is that unitors and associators "don't have much weight".
mul_assoc : (mul ▷ X) ≫ mul = (α_ X X X).hom ≫ (X ◁ mul) ≫ mul := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] Mon_.one_mul Mon_.mul_one
attribute [simp] Mon_.one_mul Mon_.mul_one
-- We prove a more general `@[simp]` lemma below.
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Mon_.mul_assoc
namespace Mon_
variable {C}
/-- Construct an object of `Mon_ C` from an object `X : C` and `Mon_Class X` instance. -/
@[simps]
def mk' (X : C) [Mon_Class X] : Mon_ C where
X := X
one := η
mul := μ
instance {M : Mon_ C} : Mon_Class M.X where
one := M.one
mul := M.mul
one_mul' := M.one_mul
mul_one' := M.mul_one
mul_assoc' := M.mul_assoc
variable (C)
/-- The trivial monoid object. We later show this is initial in `Mon_ C`.
-/
@[simps]
def trivial : Mon_ C where
X := 𝟙_ C
one := 𝟙 _
mul := (λ_ _).hom
mul_assoc := by monoidal_coherence
mul_one := by monoidal_coherence
instance : Inhabited (Mon_ C) :=
⟨trivial C⟩
variable {C}
variable {M : Mon_ C}
@[simp]
theorem one_mul_hom {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ M.X) : (M.one ⊗ f) ≫ M.mul = (λ_ Z).hom ≫ f := by
rw [tensorHom_def'_assoc, M.one_mul, leftUnitor_naturality]
@[simp]
theorem mul_one_hom {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ M.X) : (f ⊗ M.one) ≫ M.mul = (ρ_ Z).hom ≫ f := by
rw [tensorHom_def_assoc, M.mul_one, rightUnitor_naturality]
theorem mul_assoc_flip :
(M.X ◁ M.mul) ≫ M.mul = (α_ M.X M.X M.X).inv ≫ (M.mul ▷ M.X) ≫ M.mul := by simp
/-- A morphism of monoid objects. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (M N : Mon_ C) where
/-- The underlying morphism -/
hom : M.X ⟶ N.X
one_hom : M.one ≫ hom = N.one := by aesop_cat
mul_hom : M.mul ≫ hom = (hom ⊗ hom) ≫ N.mul := by aesop_cat
/-- Construct a morphism `M ⟶ N` of `Mon_ C` from a map `f : M ⟶ N` and a `IsMon_Hom f` instance. -/
abbrev Hom.mk' {M N : C} [Mon_Class M] [Mon_Class N] (f : M ⟶ N) [IsMon_Hom f] :
Hom (.mk' M) (.mk' N) := .mk f
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.one_hom Hom.mul_hom
/-- The identity morphism on a monoid object. -/
@[simps]
def id (M : Mon_ C) : Hom M M where
hom := 𝟙 M.X
instance homInhabited (M : Mon_ C) : Inhabited (Hom M M) :=
⟨id M⟩
/-- Composition of morphisms of monoid objects. -/
@[simps]
def comp {M N O : Mon_ C} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N O) : Hom M O where
hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom
instance : Category (Mon_ C) where
Hom M N := Hom M N
id := id
comp f g := comp f g
instance {M N : Mon_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) : IsMon_Hom f.hom := ⟨f.2, f.3⟩
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : Mon_ C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g :=
Hom.ext w
@[simp]
theorem id_hom' (M : Mon_ C) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M).hom = 𝟙 M.X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom' {M N K : Mon_ C} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
(f ≫ g : Hom M K).hom = f.hom ≫ g.hom :=
rfl
section
variable (C)
/-- The forgetful functor from monoid objects to the ambient category. -/
@[simps]
def forget : Mon_ C ⥤ C where
obj A := A.X
map f := f.hom
end
instance forget_faithful : (forget C).Faithful where
instance {A B : Mon_ C} (f : A ⟶ B) [e : IsIso ((forget C).map f)] : IsIso f.hom :=
e
/-- The forgetful functor from monoid objects to the ambient category reflects isomorphisms. -/
instance : (forget C).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects f e := ⟨⟨{ hom := inv f.hom }, by aesop_cat⟩⟩
/-- Construct an isomorphism of monoids by giving an isomorphism between the underlying objects
and checking compatibility with unit and multiplication only in the forward direction.
-/
@[simps]
def mkIso {M N : Mon_ C} (f : M.X ≅ N.X) (one_f : M.one ≫ f.hom = N.one := by aesop_cat)
(mul_f : M.mul ≫ f.hom = (f.hom ⊗ f.hom) ≫ N.mul := by aesop_cat) : M ≅ N where
hom := { hom := f.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := f.inv
one_hom := by rw [← one_f]; simp
mul_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [mul_f]
simp }
@[simps]
instance uniqueHomFromTrivial (A : Mon_ C) : Unique (trivial C ⟶ A) where
default :=
{ hom := A.one
mul_hom := by simp [A.one_mul, unitors_equal] }
uniq f := by
ext
simp only [trivial_X]
rw [← Category.id_comp f.hom]
erw [f.one_hom]
open CategoryTheory.Limits
instance : HasInitial (Mon_ C) :=
hasInitial_of_unique (trivial C)
end Mon_
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {C} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
section LaxMonoidal
variable [F.LaxMonoidal] (X Y : C) [Mon_Class X] [Mon_Class Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsMon_Hom f]
/-- The image of a monoid object under a lax monoidal functor is a monoid object. -/
abbrev obj.instMon_Class : Mon_Class (F.obj X) where
one := ε F ≫ F.map η
mul := LaxMonoidal.μ F X X ≫ F.map μ
one_mul' := by simp [← F.map_comp]
mul_one' := by simp [← F.map_comp]
mul_assoc' := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, Mon_Class.mul_assoc]
simp
attribute [local instance] obj.instMon_Class
@[reassoc, simp] lemma obj.η_def : (η : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj X) = ε F ≫ F.map η := rfl
@[reassoc, simp] lemma obj.μ_def : μ = LaxMonoidal.μ F X X ≫ F.map μ := rfl
instance map.instIsMon_Hom : IsMon_Hom (F.map f) where
one_hom := by simp [← map_comp]
mul_hom := by simp [← map_comp]
-- TODO: mapMod F A : Mod A ⥤ Mod (F.mapMon A)
/-- A lax monoidal functor takes monoid objects to monoid objects.
That is, a lax monoidal functor `F : C ⥤ D` induces a functor `Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D`.
-/
@[simps]
def mapMon (F : C ⥤ D) [F.LaxMonoidal] : Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D where
-- TODO: The following could be, but it leads to weird `erw`s later down the file
-- obj A := .mk' (F.obj A.X)
obj A :=
{ X := F.obj A.X
one := ε F ≫ F.map A.one
mul := «μ» F _ _ ≫ F.map A.mul
one_mul := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
LaxMonoidal.left_unitality]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, A.one_mul]
mul_one := by
simp_rw [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc,
LaxMonoidal.right_unitality]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, A.mul_one]
mul_assoc := by
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Category.assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← F.map_comp, A.mul_assoc]
simp }
map f := .mk' (F.map f.hom)
protected instance Faithful.mapMon [F.Faithful] : F.mapMon.Faithful where
map_injective {_X _Y} _f _g hfg := Mon_.Hom.ext <| map_injective congr(($hfg).hom)
end LaxMonoidal
section Monoidal
variable [F.Monoidal]
attribute [local instance] obj.instMon_Class
protected instance Full.mapMon [F.Full] [F.Faithful] : F.mapMon.Full where
map_surjective {X Y} f :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := F.map_surjective f.hom
⟨{
hom := g
one_hom := F.map_injective <| by simpa [← hg, cancel_epi] using f.one_hom
mul_hom := F.map_injective <| by simpa [← hg, cancel_epi] using f.mul_hom
}, Mon_.Hom.ext hg⟩
instance FullyFaithful.isMon_Hom_preimage (hF : F.FullyFaithful) {X Y : C}
[Mon_Class X] [Mon_Class Y] (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) [IsMon_Hom f] :
IsMon_Hom (hF.preimage f) where
one_hom := hF.map_injective <| by simp [← obj.η_def_assoc, ← obj.η_def, ← cancel_epi (ε F)]
mul_hom := hF.map_injective <| by
simp [← obj.μ_def_assoc, ← obj.μ_def, ← μ_natural_assoc, ← cancel_epi (LaxMonoidal.μ F ..)]
/-- If `F : C ⥤ D` is a fully faithful monoidal functor, then `Mon(F) : Mon C ⥤ Mon D` is fully
faithful too. -/
protected def FullyFaithful.mapMon (hF : F.FullyFaithful) : F.mapMon.FullyFaithful where
preimage {X Y} f := .mk' <| hF.preimage f.hom
end Monoidal
variable (C D)
/-- `mapMon` is functorial in the lax monoidal functor. -/
@[simps] -- Porting note: added this, not sure how it worked previously without.
def mapMonFunctor : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D ⥤ Mon_ C ⥤ Mon_ D where
obj F := F.mapMon
map α := { app := fun A => { hom := α.hom.app A.X } }
map_comp _ _ := rfl
end CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace Mon_
namespace EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps]
def laxMonoidalToMon : LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C ⥤ Mon_ C where
obj F := (F.mapMon : Mon_ _ ⥤ Mon_ C).obj (trivial (Discrete PUnit))
map α := ((Functor.mapMonFunctor (Discrete PUnit) C).map α).app _
variable {C}
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps!]
def monToLaxMonoidalObj (A : Mon_ C) :
Discrete PUnit.{u + 1} ⥤ C := (Functor.const _).obj A.X
instance (A : Mon_ C) : (monToLaxMonoidalObj A).LaxMonoidal where
ε' := A.one
μ' := fun _ _ => A.mul
@[simp]
lemma monToLaxMonoidalObj_ε (A : Mon_ C) :
ε (monToLaxMonoidalObj A) = A.one := rfl
@[simp]
lemma monToLaxMonoidalObj_μ (A : Mon_ C) (X Y) :
«μ» (monToLaxMonoidalObj A) X Y = A.mul := rfl
variable (C)
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps]
def monToLaxMonoidal : Mon_ C ⥤ LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C where
obj A := LaxMonoidalFunctor.of (monToLaxMonoidalObj A)
map f :=
{ hom := { app := fun _ => f.hom }
isMonoidal := { } }
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps!]
def unitIso :
𝟭 (LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C) ≅ laxMonoidalToMon C ⋙ monToLaxMonoidal C :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun F ↦ LaxMonoidalFunctor.isoOfComponents (fun _ ↦ F.mapIso (eqToIso (by ext))))
/-- Implementation of `Mon_.equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit`. -/
@[simps!]
def counitIso : monToLaxMonoidal C ⋙ laxMonoidalToMon C ≅ 𝟭 (Mon_ C) :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun F ↦ mkIso (Iso.refl _)
end EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
open EquivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit
attribute [local simp] eqToIso_map
/--
Monoid objects in `C` are "just" lax monoidal functors from the trivial monoidal category to `C`.
-/
@[simps]
def equivLaxMonoidalFunctorPUnit : LaxMonoidalFunctor (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1}) C ≌ Mon_ C where
functor := laxMonoidalToMon C
inverse := monToLaxMonoidal C
unitIso := unitIso C
counitIso := counitIso C
end Mon_
namespace Mon_
/-!
In this section, we prove that the category of monoids in a braided monoidal category is monoidal.
Given two monoids `M` and `N` in a braided monoidal category `C`,
| the multiplication on the tensor product `M.X ⊗ N.X` is defined in the obvious way:
it is the tensor product of the multiplications on `M` and `N`,
except that the tensor factors in the source come in the wrong order,
which we fix by pre-composing with a permutation isomorphism constructed from the braiding.
(There is a subtlety here: in fact there are two ways to do these,
using either the positive or negative crossing.)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Mon_.lean | 440 | 447 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Interval
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Pi
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
/-!
# Theory of topology on ordered spaces
## Main definitions
The order topology on an ordered space is the topology generated by all open intervals (or
equivalently by those of the form `(-∞, a)` and `(b, +∞)`). We define it as `Preorder.topology α`.
However, we do *not* register it as an instance (as many existing ordered types already have
topologies, which would be equal but not definitionally equal to `Preorder.topology α`). Instead,
we introduce a class `OrderTopology α` (which is a `Prop`, also known as a mixin) saying that on
the type `α` having already a topological space structure and a preorder structure, the topological
structure is equal to the order topology.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts. For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `OrderTopology`, `Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
* `exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds`, `exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds` : if `x < y`, then any
neighborhood of `x` includes an interval `[x, z)` for some `z ∈ (x, y]`, and any neighborhood
of `y` includes an interval `(z, y]` for some `z ∈ [x, y)`.
* `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le` : theorem known as squeeze theorem,
sandwich theorem, theorem of Carabinieri, and two policemen (and a drunk) theorem; if `g` and `h`
both converge to `a`, and eventually `g x ≤ f x ≤ h x`, then `f` converges to `a`.
## Implementation notes
We do _not_ register the order topology as an instance on a preorder (or even on a linear order).
Indeed, on many such spaces, a topology has already been constructed in a different way (think
of the discrete spaces `ℕ` or `ℤ`, or `ℝ` that could inherit a topology as the completion of `ℚ`),
and is in general not defeq to the one generated by the intervals. We make it available as a
definition `Preorder.topology α` though, that can be registered as an instance when necessary, or
for specific types.
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- TODO: define `Preorder.topology` before `OrderTopology` and reuse the def
/-- The order topology on an ordered type is the topology generated by open intervals. We register
it on a preorder, but it is mostly interesting in linear orders, where it is also order-closed.
We define it as a mixin. If you want to introduce the order topology on a preorder, use
`Preorder.topology`. -/
class OrderTopology (α : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The topology is generated by open intervals `Set.Ioi _` and `Set.Iio _`. -/
topology_eq_generate_intervals : t = generateFrom { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a }
/-- (Order) topology on a partial order `α` generated by the subbase of open intervals
`(a, ∞) = { x ∣ a < x }, (-∞ , b) = {x ∣ x < b}` for all `a, b` in `α`. We do not register it as an
instance as many ordered sets are already endowed with the same topology, most often in a non-defeq
way though. Register as a local instance when necessary. -/
def Preorder.topology (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : TopologicalSpace α :=
generateFrom { s : Set α | ∃ a : α, s = { b : α | a < b } ∨ s = { b : α | b < a } }
section OrderTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α]
instance [t : OrderTopology α] : OrderTopology αᵒᵈ :=
⟨by
convert OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals (α := α) using 6
apply or_comm⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_generate_intervals [t : OrderTopology α] {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ GenerateOpen { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a } s := by
rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals]; rfl
theorem isOpen_lt' [OrderTopology α] (a : α) : IsOpen { b : α | a < b } :=
isOpen_iff_generate_intervals.2 <| .basic _ ⟨a, .inl rfl⟩
theorem isOpen_gt' [OrderTopology α] (a : α) : IsOpen { b : α | b < a } :=
isOpen_iff_generate_intervals.2 <| .basic _ ⟨a, .inr rfl⟩
theorem lt_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a < x :=
(isOpen_lt' _).mem_nhds h
theorem le_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a ≤ x :=
(lt_mem_nhds h).mono fun _ => le_of_lt
theorem gt_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b :=
(isOpen_gt' _).mem_nhds h
theorem ge_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b :=
(gt_mem_nhds h).mono fun _ => le_of_lt
theorem nhds_eq_order [OrderTopology α] (a : α) :
𝓝 a = (⨅ b ∈ Iio a, 𝓟 (Ioi b)) ⊓ ⨅ b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b) := by
rw [OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals (α := α), nhds_generateFrom]
simp_rw [mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (a ∈ _), exists_or, or_and_right, iInf_or, iInf_and,
iInf_exists, iInf_inf_eq, iInf_comm (ι := Set α), iInf_iInf_eq_left, mem_Ioi, mem_Iio]
theorem tendsto_order [OrderTopology α] {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : Filter β} :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ a' < a, ∀ᶠ b in x, a' < f b) ∧ ∀ a' > a, ∀ᶠ b in x, f b < a' := by
simp only [nhds_eq_order a, tendsto_inf, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]; rfl
instance tendstoIccClassNhds [OrderTopology α] (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Icc (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) := by
simp only [nhds_eq_order, iInf_subtype']
refine
((hasBasis_iInf_principal_finite _).inf (hasBasis_iInf_principal_finite _)).tendstoIxxClass
fun s _ => ?_
refine ((ordConnected_biInter ?_).inter (ordConnected_biInter ?_)).out <;> intro _ _
exacts [ordConnected_Ioi, ordConnected_Iio]
instance tendstoIcoClassNhds [OrderTopology α] (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Ico (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendstoIxxClass_of_subset fun _ _ => Ico_subset_Icc_self
instance tendstoIocClassNhds [OrderTopology α] (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Ioc (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendstoIxxClass_of_subset fun _ _ => Ioc_subset_Icc_self
instance tendstoIooClassNhds [OrderTopology α] (a : α) : TendstoIxxClass Ioo (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a) :=
tendstoIxxClass_of_subset fun _ _ => Ioo_subset_Icc_self
/-- **Squeeze theorem** (also known as **sandwich theorem**). This version assumes that inequalities
hold eventually for the filter. -/
theorem tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' [OrderTopology α] {f g h : β → α} {b : Filter β}
{a : α} (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : Tendsto h b (𝓝 a)) (hgf : ∀ᶠ b in b, g b ≤ f b)
(hfh : ∀ᶠ b in b, f b ≤ h b) : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
(hg.Icc hh).of_smallSets <| hgf.and hfh
alias Filter.Tendsto.squeeze' := tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'
/-- **Squeeze theorem** (also known as **sandwich theorem**). This version assumes that inequalities
hold everywhere. -/
theorem tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le [OrderTopology α] {f g h : β → α} {b : Filter β}
{a : α} (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : Tendsto h b (𝓝 a)) (hgf : g ≤ f) (hfh : f ≤ h) :
Tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' hg hh (Eventually.of_forall hgf)
(Eventually.of_forall hfh)
alias Filter.Tendsto.squeeze := tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le
theorem nhds_order_unbounded [OrderTopology α] {a : α} (hu : ∃ u, a < u) (hl : ∃ l, l < a) :
𝓝 a = ⨅ (l) (_ : l < a) (u) (_ : a < u), 𝓟 (Ioo l u) := by
simp only [nhds_eq_order, ← inf_biInf, ← biInf_inf, *, ← inf_principal, ← Ioi_inter_Iio]; rfl
theorem tendsto_order_unbounded [OrderTopology α] {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : Filter β}
(hu : ∃ u, a < u) (hl : ∃ l, l < a) (h : ∀ l u, l < a → a < u → ∀ᶠ b in x, l < f b ∧ f b < u) :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) := by
simp only [nhds_order_unbounded hu hl, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
exact fun l hl u => h l u hl
end Preorder
instance tendstoIxxNhdsWithin {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] (a : α) {s t : Set α}
{Ixx} [TendstoIxxClass Ixx (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a)] [TendstoIxxClass Ixx (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t)] :
TendstoIxxClass Ixx (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] a) :=
Filter.tendstoIxxClass_inf
instance tendstoIccClassNhdsPi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] [∀ i, OrderTopology (α i)] (f : ∀ i, α i) :
TendstoIxxClass Icc (𝓝 f) (𝓝 f) := by
constructor
conv in (𝓝 f).smallSets => rw [nhds_pi, Filter.pi]
simp only [smallSets_iInf, smallSets_comap_eq_comap_image, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff]
intro i
have : Tendsto (fun g : ∀ i, α i => g i) (𝓝 f) (𝓝 (f i)) := (continuous_apply i).tendsto f
refine (this.comp tendsto_fst).Icc (this.comp tendsto_snd) |>.smallSets_mono ?_
filter_upwards [] using fun ⟨f, g⟩ ↦ image_subset_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ ⟨hp.1 i, hp.2 i⟩
theorem induced_topology_le_preorder [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y) :
induced f ‹TopologicalSpace β› ≤ Preorder.topology α := by
let _ := Preorder.topology α; have : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
refine le_of_nhds_le_nhds fun x => ?_
simp only [nhds_eq_order, nhds_induced, comap_inf, comap_iInf, comap_principal, Ioi, Iio, ← hf]
refine inf_le_inf (le_iInf₂ fun a ha => ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun a ha => ?_)
exacts [iInf₂_le (f a) ha, iInf₂_le (f a) ha]
theorem induced_topology_eq_preorder [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H₁ : ∀ {a b x}, b < f a → ¬(b < f x) → ∃ y, y < a ∧ b ≤ f y)
(H₂ : ∀ {a b x}, f a < b → ¬(f x < b) → ∃ y, a < y ∧ f y ≤ b) :
induced f ‹TopologicalSpace β› = Preorder.topology α := by
let _ := Preorder.topology α; have : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
refine le_antisymm (induced_topology_le_preorder hf) ?_
refine le_of_nhds_le_nhds fun a => ?_
simp only [nhds_eq_order, nhds_induced, comap_inf, comap_iInf, comap_principal]
refine inf_le_inf (le_iInf₂ fun b hb => ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun b hb => ?_)
· rcases em (∃ x, ¬(b < f x)) with (⟨x, hx⟩ | hb)
· rcases H₁ hb hx with ⟨y, hya, hyb⟩
exact iInf₂_le_of_le y hya (principal_mono.2 fun z hz => hyb.trans_lt (hf.2 hz))
· push_neg at hb
exact le_principal_iff.2 (univ_mem' hb)
· rcases em (∃ x, ¬(f x < b)) with (⟨x, hx⟩ | hb)
· rcases H₂ hb hx with ⟨y, hya, hyb⟩
exact iInf₂_le_of_le y hya (principal_mono.2 fun z hz => (hf.2 hz).trans_le hyb)
· push_neg at hb
exact le_principal_iff.2 (univ_mem' hb)
theorem induced_orderTopology' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Preorder α] [ta : TopologicalSpace β]
[Preorder β] [OrderTopology β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H₁ : ∀ {a x}, x < f a → ∃ b < a, x ≤ f b) (H₂ : ∀ {a x}, f a < x → ∃ b > a, f b ≤ x) :
@OrderTopology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
let _ := induced f ta
⟨induced_topology_eq_preorder hf (fun h _ => H₁ h) (fun h _ => H₂ h)⟩
theorem induced_orderTopology {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Preorder α] [ta : TopologicalSpace β]
[Preorder β] [OrderTopology β] (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H : ∀ {x y}, x < y → ∃ a, x < f a ∧ f a < y) : @OrderTopology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
induced_orderTopology' f (hf)
(fun xa => let ⟨b, xb, ba⟩ := H xa; ⟨b, hf.1 ba, le_of_lt xb⟩)
fun ax => let ⟨b, ab, bx⟩ := H ax; ⟨b, hf.1 ab, le_of_lt bx⟩
/-- The topology induced by a strictly monotone function with order-connected range is the preorder
topology. -/
nonrec theorem StrictMono.induced_topology_eq_preorder {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α]
[LinearOrder β] [t : TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StrictMono f) (hc : OrdConnected (range f)) : t.induced f = Preorder.topology α := by
refine induced_topology_eq_preorder hf.lt_iff_lt (fun h₁ h₂ => ?_) fun h₁ h₂ => ?_
· rcases hc.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨not_lt.1 h₂, h₁.le⟩ with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hf.lt_iff_lt.1 h₁, le_rfl⟩
· rcases hc.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨h₁.le, not_lt.1 h₂⟩ with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hf.lt_iff_lt.1 h₁, le_rfl⟩
/-- A strictly monotone function between linear orders with order topology is a topological
embedding provided that the range of `f` is order-connected. -/
theorem StrictMono.isEmbedding_of_ordConnected {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
[TopologicalSpace α] [h : OrderTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StrictMono f) (hc : OrdConnected (range f)) : IsEmbedding f :=
⟨⟨h.1.trans <| Eq.symm <| hf.induced_topology_eq_preorder hc⟩, hf.injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias StrictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected := StrictMono.isEmbedding_of_ordConnected
/-- On a `Set.OrdConnected` subset of a linear order, the order topology for the restriction of the
order is the same as the restriction to the subset of the order topology. -/
instance orderTopology_of_ordConnected {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] {t : Set α} [ht : OrdConnected t] : OrderTopology t :=
⟨(Subtype.strictMono_coe t).induced_topology_eq_preorder <| by
rwa [← @Subtype.range_val _ t] at ht⟩
theorem nhdsGE_eq_iInf_inf_principal [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] (a : α) :
𝓝[≥] a = (⨅ (u) (_ : a < u), 𝓟 (Iio u)) ⊓ 𝓟 (Ici a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_eq_order]
refine le_antisymm (inf_le_inf_right _ inf_le_right) (le_inf (le_inf ?_ inf_le_left) inf_le_right)
exact inf_le_right.trans (le_iInf₂ fun l hl => principal_mono.2 <| Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hl)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Ici_eq'' := nhdsGE_eq_iInf_inf_principal
theorem nhdsLE_eq_iInf_inf_principal [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] (a : α) :
𝓝[≤] a = (⨅ l < a, 𝓟 (Ioi l)) ⊓ 𝓟 (Iic a) :=
nhdsGE_eq_iInf_inf_principal (toDual a)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Iic_eq'' := nhdsLE_eq_iInf_inf_principal
theorem nhdsGE_eq_iInf_principal [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ u, a < u) : 𝓝[≥] a = ⨅ (u) (_ : a < u), 𝓟 (Ico a u) := by
simp only [nhdsGE_eq_iInf_inf_principal, biInf_inf ha, inf_principal, Iio_inter_Ici]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Ici_eq' := nhdsGE_eq_iInf_principal
theorem nhdsLE_eq_iInf_principal [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ l, l < a) : 𝓝[≤] a = ⨅ l < a, 𝓟 (Ioc l a) := by
simp only [nhdsLE_eq_iInf_inf_principal, biInf_inf ha, inf_principal, Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Iic_eq' := nhdsLE_eq_iInf_principal
theorem nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ u, a < u) : (𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (fun u => a < u) fun u => Ico a u :=
(nhdsGE_eq_iInf_principal ha).symm ▸
hasBasis_biInf_principal
(fun b hb c hc => ⟨min b c, lt_min hb hc, Ico_subset_Ico_right (min_le_left _ _),
Ico_subset_Ico_right (min_le_right _ _)⟩)
ha
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Ici_basis' := nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt
theorem nhdsLE_basis_of_exists_lt [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ l, l < a) : (𝓝[≤] a).HasBasis (fun l => l < a) fun l => Ioc l a := by
convert nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt (α := αᵒᵈ) ha using 2
exact Ico_toDual.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Iic_basis' := nhdsLE_basis_of_exists_lt
theorem nhdsGE_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
(𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (fun u => a < u) fun u => Ico a u :=
nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt (exists_gt a)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Ici_basis := nhdsGE_basis
theorem nhdsLE_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) :
(𝓝[≤] a).HasBasis (fun l => l < a) fun l => Ioc l a :=
nhdsLE_basis_of_exists_lt (exists_lt a)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias nhdsWithin_Iic_basis := nhdsLE_basis
theorem nhds_top_order [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] [OrderTopology α] :
𝓝 (⊤ : α) = ⨅ (l) (_ : l < ⊤), 𝓟 (Ioi l) := by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊤ : α)]
theorem nhds_bot_order [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] [OrderTopology α] :
𝓝 (⊥ : α) = ⨅ (l) (_ : ⊥ < l), 𝓟 (Iio l) := by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊥ : α)]
theorem nhds_top_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTop α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] : (𝓝 ⊤).HasBasis (fun a : α => a < ⊤) fun a : α => Ioi a := by
have : ∃ x : α, x < ⊤ := (exists_ne ⊤).imp fun x hx => hx.lt_top
simpa only [Iic_top, nhdsWithin_univ, Ioc_top] using nhdsLE_basis_of_exists_lt this
theorem nhds_bot_basis [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderBot α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] : (𝓝 ⊥).HasBasis (fun a : α => ⊥ < a) fun a : α => Iio a :=
nhds_top_basis (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem nhds_top_basis_Ici [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTop α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] [DenselyOrdered α] : (𝓝 ⊤).HasBasis (fun a : α => a < ⊤) Ici :=
nhds_top_basis.to_hasBasis
(fun _a ha => let ⟨b, hab, hb⟩ := exists_between ha; ⟨b, hb, Ici_subset_Ioi.mpr hab⟩)
fun a ha => ⟨a, ha, Ioi_subset_Ici_self⟩
theorem nhds_bot_basis_Iic [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderBot α] [OrderTopology α]
[Nontrivial α] [DenselyOrdered α] : (𝓝 ⊥).HasBasis (fun a : α => ⊥ < a) Iic :=
nhds_top_basis_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_mono [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderTopology β]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 ⊤)) (hg : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 ⊤) := by
simp only [nhds_top_order, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal] at hf ⊢
intro x hx
filter_upwards [hf x hx, hg] with _ using lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem tendsto_nhds_bot_mono [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder β] [OrderBot β] [OrderTopology β]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 ⊥)) (hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 ⊥) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_mono (β := βᵒᵈ) hf hg
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_mono' [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderTopology β]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 ⊤)) (hg : f ≤ g) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 ⊤) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_mono hf (Eventually.of_forall hg)
theorem tendsto_nhds_bot_mono' [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder β] [OrderBot β] [OrderTopology β]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 ⊥)) (hg : g ≤ f) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 ⊥) :=
tendsto_nhds_bot_mono hf (Eventually.of_forall hg)
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
section OrderTopology
theorem order_separated [OrderTopology α] {a₁ a₂ : α} (h : a₁ < a₂) :
∃ u v : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ a₁ ∈ u ∧ a₂ ∈ v ∧ ∀ b₁ ∈ u, ∀ b₂ ∈ v, b₁ < b₂ :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, h⟩ := h.exists_disjoint_Iio_Ioi
⟨Iio x, Ioi y, isOpen_gt' _, isOpen_lt' _, hx, hy, h⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderTopology.to_orderClosedTopology [OrderTopology α] :
OrderClosedTopology α where
isClosed_le' := isOpen_compl_iff.1 <| isOpen_prod_iff.mpr fun a₁ a₂ (h : ¬a₁ ≤ a₂) =>
have h : a₂ < a₁ := lt_of_not_ge h
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha₁, ha₂, h⟩ := order_separated h
⟨v, u, hv, hu, ha₂, ha₁, fun ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => not_le_of_gt <| h b₂ h₂ b₁ h₁⟩
theorem exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a)
(h : ∃ l, l < a) : ∃ l < a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(nhdsLE_basis_of_exists_lt h).mem_iff.mp (nhdsWithin_le_nhds hs)
theorem exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) {l : α}
(hl : l < a) : ∃ l' ∈ Ico l a, Ioc l' a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'a, hl's⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds hs ⟨l, hl⟩
⟨max l l', ⟨le_max_left _ _, max_lt hl hl'a⟩,
(Ioc_subset_Ioc_left <| le_max_right _ _).trans hl's⟩
theorem exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) {u : α}
(hu : a < u) : ∃ u' ∈ Ioc a u, Ico a u' ⊆ s := by
simpa only [OrderDual.exists, exists_prop, Ico_toDual, Ioc_toDual] using
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 (toDual a) from hs) hu.dual
theorem exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a)
(h : ∃ u, a < u) : ∃ u, a < u ∧ Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_l', hl'⟩ := h
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' hs hl'
⟨l, hl.1.1, hl.2⟩
theorem exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsGE [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a) : ∃ b, a ≤ b ∧ Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ∧ Icc a b ⊆ s := by
rcases (em (IsMax a)).imp_right not_isMax_iff.mp with (ha | ha)
· use a
simpa [ha.Ici_eq] using hs
· rcases(nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt ha).mem_iff.mp hs with ⟨b, hab, hbs⟩
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (Ioo a b) with (H | ⟨c, hac, hcb⟩)
· have : Ico a b = Icc a a := by rw [← Icc_union_Ioo_eq_Ico le_rfl hab, H, union_empty]
exact ⟨a, le_rfl, this ▸ ⟨Ico_mem_nhdsGE hab, hbs⟩⟩
· refine ⟨c, hac.le, Icc_mem_nhdsGE hac, ?_⟩
exact (Icc_subset_Ico_right hcb).trans hbs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsGE
theorem exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsLE [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a) : ∃ b ≤ a, Icc b a ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ∧ Icc b a ⊆ s := by
simpa only [Icc_toDual, toDual.surjective.exists] using
exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsGE (α := αᵒᵈ) (a := toDual a) hs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsLE
theorem exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhds [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
∃ b c, a ∈ Icc b c ∧ Icc b c ∈ 𝓝 a ∧ Icc b c ⊆ s := by
rcases exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsLE (nhdsWithin_le_nhds hs) with
⟨b, hba, hb_nhds, hbs⟩
rcases exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhdsGE (nhdsWithin_le_nhds hs) with
⟨c, hac, hc_nhds, hcs⟩
refine ⟨b, c, ⟨hba, hac⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← Icc_union_Icc_eq_Icc hba hac, ← nhdsLE_sup_nhdsGE]
exact ⟨union_mem_sup hb_nhds hc_nhds, union_subset hbs hcs⟩
theorem IsOpen.exists_Ioo_subset [OrderTopology α] [Nontrivial α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsOpen s)
(h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ a b, a < b ∧ Ioo a b ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ s := h
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ y, y ≠ x := exists_ne x
rcases lt_trichotomy x y with (H | rfl | H)
· obtain ⟨u, xu, hu⟩ : ∃ u, x < u ∧ Ico x u ⊆ s :=
exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx) ⟨y, H⟩
exact ⟨x, u, xu, Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans hu⟩
· exact (hy rfl).elim
· obtain ⟨l, lx, hl⟩ : ∃ l, l < x ∧ Ioc l x ⊆ s :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx) ⟨y, H⟩
exact ⟨l, x, lx, Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans hl⟩
theorem dense_of_exists_between [OrderTopology α] [Nontrivial α] {s : Set α}
(h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < b → ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b) : Dense s := by
refine dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U U_open U_nonempty => ?_
obtain ⟨a, b, hab, H⟩ : ∃ a b : α, a < b ∧ Ioo a b ⊆ U := U_open.exists_Ioo_subset U_nonempty
obtain ⟨x, xs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, a < x ∧ x < b := h hab
exact ⟨x, ⟨H hx, xs⟩⟩
/-- A set in a nontrivial densely linear ordered type is dense in the sense of topology if and only
if for any `a < b` there exists `c ∈ s`, `a < c < b`. Each implication requires less typeclass
assumptions. -/
theorem dense_iff_exists_between [OrderTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [Nontrivial α] {s : Set α} :
Dense s ↔ ∀ a b, a < b → ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
⟨fun h _ _ hab => h.exists_between hab, dense_of_exists_between⟩
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, u)` containing `a`,
provided `a` is neither a bottom element nor a top element. -/
theorem mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' [OrderTopology α] {a : α} {s : Set α} (hl : ∃ l, l < a)
(hu : ∃ u, a < u) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds h hu with ⟨u, au, hu⟩
rcases exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds h hl with ⟨l, la, hl⟩
exact ⟨l, u, ⟨la, au⟩, Ioc_union_Ico_eq_Ioo la au ▸ union_subset hl hu⟩
· rintro ⟨l, u, ha, h⟩
apply mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds ha.1 ha.2) h
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, u)` containing `a`.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [OrderTopology α] [NoMaxOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] {a : α}
{s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' (exists_lt a) (exists_gt a)
theorem nhds_basis_Ioo' [OrderTopology α] {a : α} (hl : ∃ l, l < a) (hu : ∃ u, a < u) :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun b : α × α => b.1 < a ∧ a < b.2) fun b => Ioo b.1 b.2 :=
⟨fun s => (mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hl hu).trans <| by simp⟩
theorem nhds_basis_Ioo [OrderTopology α] [NoMaxOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun b : α × α => b.1 < a ∧ a < b.2) fun b => Ioo b.1 b.2 :=
nhds_basis_Ioo' (exists_lt a) (exists_gt a)
theorem Filter.Eventually.exists_Ioo_subset [OrderTopology α] [NoMaxOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] {a : α}
{p : α → Prop} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∃ l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ { x | p x } :=
mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.1 hp
theorem Dense.topology_eq_generateFrom [OrderTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] {s : Set α}
(hs : Dense s) : ‹TopologicalSpace α› = .generateFrom (Ioi '' s ∪ Iio '' s) := by
refine (OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals (α := α)).trans ?_
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti ?_) (le_generateFrom ?_)
· simp only [union_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
exact ⟨fun a _ ↦ ⟨a, .inl rfl⟩, fun a _ ↦ ⟨a, .inr rfl⟩⟩
· rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [hs.Ioi_eq_biUnion]
let _ := generateFrom (Ioi '' s ∪ Iio '' s)
exact isOpen_iUnion fun x ↦ isOpen_iUnion fun h ↦ .basic _ <| .inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ h.1
· rw [hs.Iio_eq_biUnion]
let _ := generateFrom (Ioi '' s ∪ Iio '' s)
exact isOpen_iUnion fun x ↦ isOpen_iUnion fun h ↦ .basic _ <| .inr <| mem_image_of_mem _ h.1
theorem PredOrder.hasBasis_nhds_Ioc_of_exists_gt [OrderTopology α] [PredOrder α] {a : α}
(ha : ∃ u, a < u) : (𝓝 a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Set.Ico a ·) :=
PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds a ▸ nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt ha
| theorem PredOrder.hasBasis_nhds_Ioc [OrderTopology α] [PredOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Set.Ico a ·) :=
PredOrder.hasBasis_nhds_Ioc_of_exists_gt (exists_gt a)
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/Basic.lean | 500 | 502 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Taylor
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
/-!
# Laurent expansions of rational functions
## Main declarations
* `RatFunc.laurent`: the Laurent expansion of the rational function `f` at `r`, as an `AlgHom`.
* `RatFunc.laurent_injective`: the Laurent expansion at `r` is unique
## Implementation details
Implemented as the quotient of two Taylor expansions, over domains.
An auxiliary definition is provided first to make the construction of the `AlgHom` easier,
which works on `CommRing` which are not necessarily domains.
-/
universe u
namespace RatFunc
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (r s : R) (p q : R[X]) (f : RatFunc R)
theorem taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors (hp : p ∈ R[X]⁰) : taylor r p ∈ R[X]⁰ := by
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff]
intro x hx
have : x = taylor (r - r) x := by simp
rwa [this, sub_eq_add_neg, ← taylor_taylor, ← taylor_mul,
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (taylor_injective _), mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hp,
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (taylor_injective _)] at hx
/-- The Laurent expansion of rational functions about a value.
Auxiliary definition, usage when over integral domains should prefer `RatFunc.laurent`. -/
def laurentAux : RatFunc R →+* RatFunc R :=
RatFunc.mapRingHom
( { toFun := taylor r
map_add' := map_add (taylor r)
map_mul' := taylor_mul _
map_zero' := map_zero (taylor r)
map_one' := taylor_one r } : R[X] →+* R[X])
(taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors _)
theorem laurentAux_ofFractionRing_mk (q : R[X]⁰) :
laurentAux r (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk p q)) =
ofFractionRing (.mk (taylor r p) ⟨taylor r q, taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors r q q.prop⟩) :=
map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
variable [IsDomain R]
theorem laurentAux_div :
laurentAux r (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (taylor r p) / algebraMap _ _ (taylor r q) :=
-- Porting note: added `by exact taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors r`
map_apply_div _ (by exact taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors r) _ _
@[simp]
theorem laurentAux_algebraMap : laurentAux r (algebraMap _ _ p) = algebraMap _ _ (taylor r p) := by
rw [← mk_one, ← mk_one, mk_eq_div, laurentAux_div, mk_eq_div, taylor_one, map_one, map_one]
/-- The Laurent expansion of rational functions about a value. -/
| def laurent : RatFunc R →ₐ[R] RatFunc R :=
RatFunc.mapAlgHom (.ofLinearMap (taylor r) (taylor_one _) (taylor_mul _))
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Laurent.lean | 74 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.NoAtoms
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.SFinite
/-!
# Dirac measure
In this file we define the Dirac measure `MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac a`
and prove some basic facts about it.
-/
open Function Set
open scoped ENNReal
noncomputable section
variable {α β δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α} {a : α}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- The dirac measure. -/
def dirac (a : α) : Measure α := (OuterMeasure.dirac a).toMeasure (by simp)
instance : MeasureSpace PUnit :=
⟨dirac PUnit.unit⟩
theorem le_dirac_apply {a} : s.indicator 1 a ≤ dirac a s :=
OuterMeasure.dirac_apply a s ▸ le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem dirac_apply' (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : dirac a s = s.indicator 1 a :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
@[simp]
theorem dirac_apply_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : dirac a s = 1 := by
have : ∀ t : Set α, a ∈ t → t.indicator (1 : α → ℝ≥0∞) a = 1 := fun t ht => indicator_of_mem ht 1
refine le_antisymm (this univ trivial ▸ ?_) (this s h ▸ le_dirac_apply)
rw [← dirac_apply' a MeasurableSet.univ]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ s)
@[simp]
theorem dirac_apply [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (a : α) (s : Set α) :
dirac a s = s.indicator 1 a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s; · rw [dirac_apply_of_mem h, indicator_of_mem h, Pi.one_apply]
rw [indicator_of_not_mem h, ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
calc
dirac a s ≤ dirac a {a}ᶜ := measure_mono (subset_compl_comm.1 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 h)
_ = 0 := by simp [dirac_apply' _ (measurableSet_singleton _).compl]
@[simp] lemma dirac_ne_zero : dirac a ≠ 0 :=
fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using dirac_apply_of_mem (mem_univ a)
theorem map_dirac {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) : (dirac a).map f = dirac (f a) := by
classical
exact ext fun s hs => by simp [hs, map_apply hf hs, hf hs, indicator_apply]
@[simp]
lemma map_const (μ : Measure α) (c : β) : μ.map (fun _ ↦ c) = (μ Set.univ) • dirac c := by
ext s hs
simp only [aemeasurable_const, measurable_const, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply,
dirac_apply' _ hs, smul_eq_mul]
classical
rw [Measure.map_apply measurable_const hs, Set.preimage_const]
by_cases hsc : c ∈ s
· rw [(Set.indicator_eq_one_iff_mem _).mpr hsc, mul_one, if_pos hsc]
· rw [if_neg hsc, (Set.indicator_eq_zero_iff_not_mem _).mpr hsc, measure_empty, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_singleton (μ : Measure α) (a : α) : μ.restrict {a} = μ {a} • dirac a := by
ext1 s hs
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· have : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by simpa
simp [*]
· have : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := inter_singleton_eq_empty.2 ha
simp [*]
/-- Two measures on a countable space are equal if they agree on singletons. -/
theorem ext_of_singleton [Countable α] {μ ν : Measure α} (h : ∀ a, μ {a} = ν {a}) : μ = ν :=
ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ (countable_range singleton) (by aesop) (by aesop)
/-- Two measures on a countable space are equal if and only if they agree on singletons. -/
theorem ext_iff_singleton [Countable α] {μ ν : Measure α} : μ = ν ↔ ∀ a, μ {a} = ν {a} :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ h ▸ rfl, ext_of_singleton⟩
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.ext_iff_measureReal_singleton [Countable α]
{μ1 μ2 : Measure α} [SigmaFinite μ1] [SigmaFinite μ2] :
μ1 = μ2 ↔ ∀ x, μ1.real {x} = μ2.real {x} := by
rw [Measure.ext_iff_singleton]
congr! with x
rw [measureReal_def, measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal_iff]
simp [measure_singleton_lt_top, ne_of_lt]
/-- If `f` is a map with countable codomain, then `μ.map f` is a sum of Dirac measures. -/
theorem map_eq_sum [Countable β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β)
(hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f = sum fun b : β => μ (f ⁻¹' {b}) • dirac b := by
ext s
have : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y}) := fun y _ => hf (measurableSet_singleton _)
simp [← tsum_measure_preimage_singleton (to_countable s) this, *,
tsum_subtype s fun b => μ (f ⁻¹' {b}), ← indicator_mul_right s fun b => μ (f ⁻¹' {b})]
/-- A measure on a countable type is a sum of Dirac measures. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_smul_dirac [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (μ : Measure α) :
(sum fun a => μ {a} • dirac a) = μ := by simpa using (map_eq_sum μ id measurable_id).symm
/-- Given that `α` is a countable, measurable space with all singleton sets measurable,
write the measure of a set `s` as the sum of the measure of `{x}` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem tsum_indicator_apply_singleton [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (μ : Measure α)
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (∑' x : α, s.indicator (fun x => μ {x}) x) = μ s := by
classical
calc
(∑' x : α, s.indicator (fun x => μ {x}) x) =
Measure.sum (fun a => μ {a} • Measure.dirac a) s := by
simp only [Measure.sum_apply _ hs, Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Measure.dirac_apply,
Set.indicator_apply, mul_ite, Pi.one_apply, mul_one, mul_zero]
_ = μ s := by rw [μ.sum_smul_dirac]
end Measure
open Measure
theorem mem_ae_dirac_iff {a : α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae (dirac a) ↔ a ∈ s := by
by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp [mem_ae_iff, dirac_apply', hs.compl, indicator_apply, *]
theorem ae_dirac_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂dirac a, p x) ↔ p a :=
mem_ae_dirac_iff hp
@[simp]
theorem ae_dirac_eq [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (a : α) : ae (dirac a) = pure a := by
ext s
simp [mem_ae_iff, imp_false]
theorem ae_eq_dirac' [MeasurableSingletonClass β] {a : α} {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
f =ᵐ[dirac a] const α (f a) :=
(ae_dirac_iff <| show MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {f a}) from hf <| measurableSet_singleton _).2 rfl
theorem ae_eq_dirac [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {a : α} (f : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[dirac a] const α (f a) := by simp [Filter.EventuallyEq]
@[fun_prop]
lemma aemeasurable_dirac [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {a : α} {f : α → β} :
AEMeasurable f (Measure.dirac a) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ f a, measurable_const, ae_eq_dirac f⟩
instance Measure.dirac.isProbabilityMeasure {x : α} : IsProbabilityMeasure (dirac x) :=
⟨dirac_apply_of_mem <| mem_univ x⟩
/-! Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance Measure.dirac.instIsFiniteMeasure {a : α} : IsFiniteMeasure (dirac a) := inferInstance
instance Measure.dirac.instSigmaFinite {a : α} : SigmaFinite (dirac a) := inferInstance
theorem restrict_dirac' (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
(Measure.dirac a).restrict s = if a ∈ s then Measure.dirac a else 0 := by
split_ifs with has
· apply restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem
rw [ae_dirac_iff] <;> assumption
· rw [restrict_eq_zero, dirac_apply' _ hs, indicator_of_not_mem has]
theorem restrict_dirac [MeasurableSingletonClass α] [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
(Measure.dirac a).restrict s = if a ∈ s then Measure.dirac a else 0 := by
split_ifs with has
· apply restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem
rwa [ae_dirac_eq]
· rw [restrict_eq_zero, dirac_apply, indicator_of_not_mem has]
lemma mutuallySingular_dirac [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (x : α) (μ : Measure α) [NoAtoms μ] :
Measure.dirac x ⟂ₘ μ :=
⟨{x}ᶜ, (MeasurableSet.singleton x).compl, by simp, by simp⟩
section dirac_injective
/-- Dirac delta measures at two points are equal if every measurable set contains either both or
neither of the points. -/
lemma dirac_eq_dirac_iff_forall_mem_iff_mem {x y : α} :
Measure.dirac x = Measure.dirac y ↔ ∀ A, MeasurableSet A → (x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A) := by
constructor
· intro h A A_mble
have obs := congr_arg (fun μ ↦ μ A) h
simp only [Measure.dirac_apply' _ A_mble] at obs
by_cases x_in_A : x ∈ A
· simpa only [x_in_A, indicator_of_mem, Pi.one_apply, true_iff, Eq.comm (a := (1 : ℝ≥0∞)),
indicator_eq_one_iff_mem] using obs
| · simpa only [x_in_A, indicator_of_not_mem, Eq.comm (a := (0 : ℝ≥0∞)), indicator_apply_eq_zero,
false_iff, not_false_eq_true, Pi.one_apply, one_ne_zero, imp_false] using obs
· intro h
ext A A_mble
by_cases x_in_A : x ∈ A
· simp only [Measure.dirac_apply' _ A_mble, x_in_A, indicator_of_mem, Pi.one_apply,
(h A A_mble).mp x_in_A]
· have y_notin_A : y ∉ A := by simp_all only [false_iff, not_false_eq_true]
simp only [Measure.dirac_apply' _ A_mble, x_in_A, y_notin_A,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Dirac.lean | 194 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
/-!
# Lemmas for the interaction between polynomials and `∑` and `∏`.
Recall that `∑` and `∏` are notation for `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod` respectively.
## Main results
- `Polynomial.natDegree_prod_of_monic` : the degree of a product of monic polynomials is the
product of degrees. We prove this only for `[CommSemiring R]`,
but it ought to be true for `[Semiring R]` and `List.prod`.
- `Polynomial.natDegree_prod` : for polynomials over an integral domain,
the degree of the product is the sum of degrees.
- `Polynomial.leadingCoeff_prod` : for polynomials over an integral domain,
the leading coefficient is the product of leading coefficients.
- `Polynomial.prod_X_sub_C_coeff_card_pred` carries most of the content for computing
the second coefficient of the characteristic polynomial.
-/
open Finset
open Multiset
open Polynomial
universe u w
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
variable (s : Finset ι)
section Semiring
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_list_sum_le (l : List S[X]) :
natDegree l.sum ≤ (l.map natDegree).foldr max 0 := by
apply List.sum_le_foldr_max natDegree
· simp
· exact natDegree_add_le
theorem natDegree_multiset_sum_le (l : Multiset S[X]) :
natDegree l.sum ≤ (l.map natDegree).foldr max 0 :=
Quotient.inductionOn l (by simpa using natDegree_list_sum_le)
theorem natDegree_sum_le (f : ι → S[X]) :
natDegree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.fold max 0 (natDegree ∘ f) := by
simpa using natDegree_multiset_sum_le (s.val.map f)
lemma natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le {n : ℕ} (f : ι → S[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, natDegree (f i) ≤ n) :
natDegree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ n :=
le_trans (natDegree_sum_le s f) <| (Finset.fold_max_le n).mpr <| by simpa
theorem degree_list_sum_le_of_forall_degree_le (l : List S[X])
(n : WithBot ℕ) (hl : ∀ p ∈ l, degree p ≤ n) :
degree l.sum ≤ n := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨hhd, htl⟩
rw [List.sum_cons]
exact le_trans (degree_add_le hd tl.sum) (max_le hhd (ih htl))
theorem degree_list_sum_le (l : List S[X]) : degree l.sum ≤ (l.map natDegree).maximum := by
apply degree_list_sum_le_of_forall_degree_le
intros p hp
by_cases h : p = 0
· subst h
simp
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
apply List.le_maximum_of_mem'
rw [List.mem_map]
use p
simp [hp]
theorem natDegree_list_prod_le (l : List S[X]) : natDegree l.prod ≤ (l.map natDegree).sum := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simpa using natDegree_mul_le.trans (add_le_add_left IH _)
theorem degree_list_prod_le (l : List S[X]) : degree l.prod ≤ (l.map degree).sum := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simpa using (degree_mul_le _ _).trans (add_le_add_left IH _)
theorem coeff_list_prod_of_natDegree_le (l : List S[X]) (n : ℕ) (hl : ∀ p ∈ l, natDegree p ≤ n) :
coeff (List.prod l) (l.length * n) = (l.map fun p => coeff p n).prod := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· have hl' : ∀ p ∈ tl, natDegree p ≤ n := fun p hp => hl p (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hp)
simp only [List.prod_cons, List.map, List.length]
rw [add_mul, one_mul, add_comm, ← IH hl', mul_comm tl.length]
have h : natDegree tl.prod ≤ n * tl.length := by
refine (natDegree_list_prod_le _).trans ?_
rw [← tl.length_map natDegree, mul_comm]
refine List.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ ?_
simpa using hl'
exact coeff_mul_add_eq_of_natDegree_le (hl _ List.mem_cons_self) h
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] (f : ι → R[X]) (t : Multiset R[X])
theorem natDegree_multiset_prod_le : t.prod.natDegree ≤ (t.map natDegree).sum :=
Quotient.inductionOn t (by simpa using natDegree_list_prod_le)
theorem natDegree_prod_le : (∏ i ∈ s, f i).natDegree ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_multiset_prod_le (s.1.map f)
/-- The degree of a product of polynomials is at most the sum of the degrees,
where the degree of the zero polynomial is ⊥.
-/
theorem degree_multiset_prod_le : t.prod.degree ≤ (t.map Polynomial.degree).sum :=
Quotient.inductionOn t (by simpa using degree_list_prod_le)
theorem degree_prod_le : (∏ i ∈ s, f i).degree ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degree := by
simpa only [Multiset.map_map] using degree_multiset_prod_le (s.1.map f)
/-- The leading coefficient of a product of polynomials is equal to
the product of the leading coefficients, provided that this product is nonzero.
See `Polynomial.leadingCoeff_multiset_prod` (without the `'`) for a version for integral domains,
where this condition is automatically satisfied.
-/
theorem leadingCoeff_multiset_prod' (h : (t.map leadingCoeff).prod ≠ 0) :
t.prod.leadingCoeff = (t.map leadingCoeff).prod := by
induction' t using Multiset.induction_on with a t ih; · simp
simp only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons] at h ⊢
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul']
· rw [ih]
simp only [ne_eq]
apply right_ne_zero_of_mul h
· rw [ih]
· exact h
simp only [ne_eq, not_false_eq_true]
apply right_ne_zero_of_mul h
/-- The leading coefficient of a product of polynomials is equal to
the product of the leading coefficients, provided that this product is nonzero.
See `Polynomial.leadingCoeff_prod` (without the `'`) for a version for integral domains,
where this condition is automatically satisfied.
-/
theorem leadingCoeff_prod' (h : (∏ i ∈ s, (f i).leadingCoeff) ≠ 0) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).leadingCoeff = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i).leadingCoeff := by
simpa using leadingCoeff_multiset_prod' (s.1.map f) (by simpa using h)
/-- The degree of a product of polynomials is equal to
the sum of the degrees, provided that the product of leading coefficients is nonzero.
See `Polynomial.natDegree_multiset_prod` (without the `'`) for a version for integral domains,
where this condition is automatically satisfied.
-/
theorem natDegree_multiset_prod' (h : (t.map fun f => leadingCoeff f).prod ≠ 0) :
t.prod.natDegree = (t.map fun f => natDegree f).sum := by
revert h
refine Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t ih ht => ?_; · simp
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons] at ht ⊢
rw [Multiset.sum_cons, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', ih]
· apply right_ne_zero_of_mul ht
· rwa [Polynomial.leadingCoeff_multiset_prod']
apply right_ne_zero_of_mul ht
/-- The degree of a product of polynomials is equal to
the sum of the degrees, provided that the product of leading coefficients is nonzero.
See `Polynomial.natDegree_prod` (without the `'`) for a version for integral domains,
where this condition is automatically satisfied.
-/
theorem natDegree_prod' (h : (∏ i ∈ s, (f i).leadingCoeff) ≠ 0) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).natDegree = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_multiset_prod' (s.1.map f) (by simpa using h)
theorem natDegree_multiset_prod_of_monic (h : ∀ f ∈ t, Monic f) :
t.prod.natDegree = (t.map natDegree).sum := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_multiset_prod'
suffices (t.map fun f => leadingCoeff f).prod = 1 by
rw [this]
simp
convert prod_replicate (Multiset.card t) (1 : R)
· simp only [eq_replicate, Multiset.card_map, eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hi
apply h
assumption
· simp
theorem degree_multiset_prod_of_monic [Nontrivial R] (h : ∀ f ∈ t, Monic f) :
t.prod.degree = (t.map degree).sum := by
have : t.prod ≠ 0 := Monic.ne_zero <| by simpa using monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ h
rw [degree_eq_natDegree this, natDegree_multiset_prod_of_monic _ h, Nat.cast_multiset_sum,
Multiset.map_map, Function.comp_def,
Multiset.map_congr rfl (fun f hf => (degree_eq_natDegree (h f hf).ne_zero).symm)]
theorem natDegree_prod_of_monic (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).Monic) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).natDegree = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_multiset_prod_of_monic (s.1.map f) (by simpa using h)
theorem degree_prod_of_monic [Nontrivial R] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).Monic) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degree = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degree := by
simpa using degree_multiset_prod_of_monic (s.1.map f) (by simpa using h)
theorem coeff_multiset_prod_of_natDegree_le (n : ℕ) (hl : ∀ p ∈ t, natDegree p ≤ n) :
coeff t.prod ((Multiset.card t) * n) = (t.map fun p => coeff p n).prod := by
induction t using Quotient.inductionOn
| simpa using coeff_list_prod_of_natDegree_le _ _ hl
theorem coeff_prod_of_natDegree_le (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ p ∈ s, natDegree (f p) ≤ n) :
coeff (∏ i ∈ s, f i) (#s * n) = ∏ i ∈ s, coeff (f i) n := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/BigOperators.lean | 219 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (Pi.map f) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuous_apply i)
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
protected theorem IsOpenMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] {f : ∀ i, π i → Y i}
(hfo : ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f i)) (hsurj : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) :
IsOpenMap (Pi.map f) := by
refine IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_pi, nhds_pi, map_piMap_pi hsurj]
exact Filter.pi_mono fun i ↦ (hfo i).nhds_le _
protected theorem IsOpenQuotientMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, IsOpenQuotientMap (f i)) : IsOpenQuotientMap (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2, .piMap (fun i ↦ (hf i).3) <|
.of_forall fun i ↦ (hf i).1⟩
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem ContinuousAt.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} {x : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (f i) (x i)) :
ContinuousAt (Pi.map f) x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuousAt_apply i x)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp_def]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Set ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict (s : Finset ι) : Continuous (s.restrict (π := π)) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Finset ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
Continuous (Finset.restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
variable [TopologicalSpace Z]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Set X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Set X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Finset X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Finset X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
section Fin
variable {n : ℕ} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finCons
{f : Y → π 0} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.succ} {l : Filter Y} {x : π 0} {y : ∀ j, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.cons x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.cases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finCons hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.matrixVecCons
{f : Y → Z} {g : Y → Fin n → Z} {l : Filter Y} {x : Z} {y : Fin n → Z}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Matrix.vecCons x y) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem ContinuousAt.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finSnoc
{f : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : Y → π (Fin.last _)}
{l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π (Fin.castSucc j)} {y : π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.snoc x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.lastCases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hf) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finSnoc hg
theorem Continuous.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finSnoc hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {l : Filter Y}
{x : π i} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth := Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInsertNth i hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth := ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
theorem Continuous.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finInsertNth i hg.continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Continuous.fin_insertNth := Continuous.finInsertNth
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInit {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.init x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.castSucc
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInit
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finInit
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finTail {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.tail x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.succ
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finTail
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finTail
end Fin
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
classical
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
· rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
theorem isOpen_pi_iff' [Finite ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ u : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ univ.pi u ⊆ s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose,
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose_spec.2,
(pi_mono fun i _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.1).trans (Subset.trans ?_ h2)⟩⟩
rw [← pi_inter_compl (I : Set ι)]
exact inter_subset_left
· exact fun ⟨u, ⟨h1, _⟩⟩ =>
⟨Finset.univ, u, ⟨fun i => ⟨u i, ⟨rfl.subset, h1 i⟩⟩, by rwa [Finset.coe_univ]⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsClosed (s a)) :
IsClosed (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact isClosed_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) (hs : I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a)
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ I) : s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi] at hs; exact mem_of_pi_mem_pi hs hi
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ 𝓝 (x a)) : pi i s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [pi_def, biInter_mem hi]
exact fun a ha => (continuous_apply a).continuousAt (hs a ha)
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) :
I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ i : ι, i ∈ I → s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi, pi_mem_pi_iff hI]
theorem interior_pi_set {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
interior (pi I s) = I.pi fun i => interior (s i) := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_pi, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, set_pi_mem_nhds_iff hI]
|
theorem exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds [DecidableEq ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (y : ∀ a, π a) : ∃ I : Finset ι, I.piecewise x y ∈ s := by
simp only [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi'] at hs
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 924 | 927 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Edge density
This file defines the number and density of edges of a relation/graph.
## Main declarations
Between two finsets of vertices,
* `Rel.interedges`: Finset of edges of a relation.
* `Rel.edgeDensity`: Edge density of a relation.
* `SimpleGraph.interedges`: Finset of edges of a graph.
* `SimpleGraph.edgeDensity`: Edge density of a graph.
-/
open Finset
variable {𝕜 ι κ α β : Type*}
/-! ### Density of a relation -/
namespace Rel
section Asymmetric
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
(r : α → β → Prop) [∀ a, DecidablePred (r a)] {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α}
{t t₁ t₂ : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β} {δ : 𝕜}
/-- Finset of edges of a relation between two finsets of vertices. -/
def interedges (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) := {e ∈ s ×ˢ t | r e.1 e.2}
/-- Edge density of a relation between two finsets of vertices. -/
def edgeDensity (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : ℚ := #(interedges r s t) / (#s * #t)
variable {r}
theorem mem_interedges_iff {x : α × β} : x ∈ interedges r s t ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t ∧ r x.1 x.2 := by
rw [interedges, mem_filter, Finset.mem_product, and_assoc]
theorem mk_mem_interedges_iff : (a, b) ∈ interedges r s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ r a b :=
mem_interedges_iff
@[simp]
theorem interedges_empty_left (t : Finset β) : interedges r ∅ t = ∅ := by
rw [interedges, Finset.empty_product, filter_empty]
theorem interedges_mono (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : interedges r s₂ t₂ ⊆ interedges r s₁ t₁ :=
fun x ↦ by
simp_rw [mem_interedges_iff]
exact fun h ↦ ⟨hs h.1, ht h.2.1, h.2.2⟩
variable (r)
theorem card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(interedges r s t) + #(interedges (fun x y ↦ ¬r x y) s t) = #s * #t := by
classical
rw [← card_product, interedges, interedges, ← card_union_of_disjoint, filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
exact disjoint_filter.2 fun _ _ ↦ Classical.not_not.2
theorem interedges_disjoint_left {s s' : Finset α} (hs : Disjoint s s') (t : Finset β) :
Disjoint (interedges r s t) (interedges r s' t) := by
rw [Finset.disjoint_left] at hs ⊢
intro _ hx hy
rw [mem_interedges_iff] at hx hy
exact hs hx.1 hy.1
theorem interedges_disjoint_right (s : Finset α) {t t' : Finset β} (ht : Disjoint t t') :
Disjoint (interedges r s t) (interedges r s t') := by
rw [Finset.disjoint_left] at ht ⊢
intro _ hx hy
rw [mem_interedges_iff] at hx hy
exact ht hx.2.1 hy.2.1
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
lemma interedges_eq_biUnion :
interedges r s t =
s.biUnion fun x ↦ {y ∈ t | r x y}.map ⟨(x, ·), Prod.mk_right_injective x⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [mem_interedges_iff]
theorem interedges_biUnion_left (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset β) (f : ι → Finset α) :
interedges r (s.biUnion f) t = s.biUnion fun a ↦ interedges r (f a) t := by
ext
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_interedges_iff, exists_and_right, ← and_assoc]
theorem interedges_biUnion_right (s : Finset α) (t : Finset ι) (f : ι → Finset β) :
interedges r s (t.biUnion f) = t.biUnion fun b ↦ interedges r s (f b) := by
ext a
simp only [mem_interedges_iff, mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨fun ⟨x₁, ⟨x₂, x₃, x₄⟩, x₅⟩ ↦ ⟨x₂, x₃, x₁, x₄, x₅⟩,
fun ⟨x₂, x₃, x₁, x₄, x₅⟩ ↦ ⟨x₁, ⟨x₂, x₃, x₄⟩, x₅⟩⟩
theorem interedges_biUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (f : ι → Finset α) (g : κ → Finset β) :
interedges r (s.biUnion f) (t.biUnion g) =
(s ×ˢ t).biUnion fun ab ↦ interedges r (f ab.1) (g ab.2) := by
simp_rw [product_biUnion, interedges_biUnion_left, interedges_biUnion_right]
end DecidableEq
theorem card_interedges_le_mul (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(interedges r s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_filter_le _ _).trans (card_product _ _).le
theorem edgeDensity_nonneg (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : 0 ≤ edgeDensity r s t := by
apply div_nonneg <;> exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
theorem edgeDensity_le_one (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : edgeDensity r s t ≤ 1 := by
apply div_le_one_of_le₀
· exact mod_cast card_interedges_le_mul r s t
· exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
theorem edgeDensity_add_edgeDensity_compl (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
edgeDensity r s t + edgeDensity (fun x y ↦ ¬r x y) s t = 1 := by
rw [edgeDensity, edgeDensity, div_add_div_same, div_eq_one_iff_eq]
· exact mod_cast card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl r s t
· exact mod_cast (mul_pos hs.card_pos ht.card_pos).ne'
@[simp]
theorem edgeDensity_empty_left (t : Finset β) : edgeDensity r ∅ t = 0 := by
rw [edgeDensity, Finset.card_empty, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, div_zero]
@[simp]
theorem edgeDensity_empty_right (s : Finset α) : edgeDensity r s ∅ = 0 := by
rw [edgeDensity, Finset.card_empty, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, div_zero]
theorem card_interedges_finpartition_left [DecidableEq α] (P : Finpartition s) (t : Finset β) :
#(interedges r s t) = ∑ a ∈ P.parts, #(interedges r a t) := by
classical
simp_rw [← P.biUnion_parts, interedges_biUnion_left, id]
rw [card_biUnion]
exact fun x hx y hy h ↦ interedges_disjoint_left r (P.disjoint hx hy h) _
theorem card_interedges_finpartition_right [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (P : Finpartition t) :
#(interedges r s t) = ∑ b ∈ P.parts, #(interedges r s b) := by
classical
simp_rw [← P.biUnion_parts, interedges_biUnion_right, id]
rw [card_biUnion]
exact fun x hx y hy h ↦ interedges_disjoint_right r _ (P.disjoint hx hy h)
theorem card_interedges_finpartition [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (P : Finpartition s)
(Q : Finpartition t) :
#(interedges r s t) = ∑ ab ∈ P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts, #(interedges r ab.1 ab.2) := by
rw [card_interedges_finpartition_left _ P, sum_product]
congr; ext
rw [card_interedges_finpartition_right]
theorem mul_edgeDensity_le_edgeDensity (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) (hs₂ : s₂.Nonempty)
(ht₂ : t₂.Nonempty) :
(#s₂ : ℚ) / #s₁ * (#t₂ / #t₁) * edgeDensity r s₂ t₂ ≤ edgeDensity r s₁ t₁ := by
have hst : (#s₂ : ℚ) * #t₂ ≠ 0 := by simp [hs₂.ne_empty, ht₂.ne_empty]
rw [edgeDensity, edgeDensity, div_mul_div_comm, mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel₀ hst]
gcongr
exact interedges_mono hs ht
|
theorem edgeDensity_sub_edgeDensity_le_one_sub_mul (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) (hs₂ : s₂.Nonempty)
(ht₂ : t₂.Nonempty) :
edgeDensity r s₂ t₂ - edgeDensity r s₁ t₁ ≤ 1 - #s₂ / #s₁ * (#t₂ / #t₁) := by
refine (sub_le_sub_left (mul_edgeDensity_le_edgeDensity r hs ht hs₂ ht₂) _).trans ?_
refine le_trans ?_ (mul_le_of_le_one_right ?_ (edgeDensity_le_one r s₂ t₂))
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Density.lean | 171 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 535 | 548 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ choice) using Lean's underlying type theory,
building on the pre-sets defined in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet`.
The theory of classes is developed in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.Class`.
## Main definitions
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
* `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `Set`.
* `Classical.allZFSetDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
-/
universe u
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
namespace ZFSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary `PSet`
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class Definable (n) (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) where
/-- Turns a definable function into an n-ary `PSet` function. -/
out : (Fin n → PSet.{u}) → PSet.{u}
/-- A set function `f` is the image of `Definable.out f`. -/
mk_out xs : mk (out xs) = f (mk <| xs ·) := by simp
attribute [simp] Definable.mk_out
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for unary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₁ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 1 (fun s ↦ f (s 0))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₁`. -/
abbrev Definable₁.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x, ⟦out x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧) :
Definable₁ f where
out xs := out (xs 0)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0)
/-- Turns a unary definable function into a unary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₁.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0)) ![x]
lemma Definable₁.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f]
{x : PSet} :
.mk (out f x) = f (.mk x) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x]
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for binary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₂ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 2 (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₂`. -/
abbrev Definable₂.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x y, ⟦out x y⟧ = f ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧) :
Definable₂ f where
out xs := out (xs 0) (xs 1)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0) (xs 1)
/-- Turns a binary definable function into a binary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₂.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x y ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1)) ![x, y]
lemma Definable₂.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₂ f]
{x y : PSet} :
.mk (out f x y) = f (.mk x) (.mk y) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x, y]
instance (f) [Definable₁ f] (n g) [Definable n g] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g s)) where
out xs := Definable₁.out f (Definable.out g xs)
instance (f) [Definable₂ f] (n g₁ g₂) [Definable n g₁] [Definable n g₂] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g₁ s) (g₂ s)) where
out xs := Definable₂.out f (Definable.out g₁ xs) (Definable.out g₂ xs)
instance (n) (i) : Definable n (fun s ↦ s i) where
out s := s i
lemma Definable.out_equiv {n} (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable n f]
{xs ys : Fin n → PSet} (h : ∀ i, xs i ≈ ys i) :
out f xs ≈ out f ys := by
rw [← Quotient.eq_iff_equiv, mk_eq, mk_eq, mk_out, mk_out]
exact congrArg _ (funext fun i ↦ Quotient.sound (h i))
lemma Definable₁.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f]
{x y : PSet} (h : x ≈ y) :
out f x ≈ out f y :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [h])
lemma Definable₂.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f]
{x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PSet} (h₁ : x₁ ≈ y₁) (h₂ : x₂ ≈ y₂) :
out f x₁ x₂ ≈ out f y₁ y₂ :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [Fin.forall_fin_succ, h₁, h₂])
end ZFSet
namespace Classical
open PSet ZFSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allZFSetDefinable {n} (F : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) : Definable n F where
out xs := (F (mk <| xs ·)).out
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ (· ∈ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet where
mem t s := ZFSet.Mem s t
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hb
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
simp [ZFSet.ext_iff]
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map₂ PSet.insert
fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun _ _ _ => PSet.mem_insert_iff.trans (or_congr_left eq.symm)
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_singleton.trans eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton (x : ZFSet) : {x, x} = ({x} : ZFSet) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x, y} : ZFSet) = {z} ↔ x = z ∧ y = z := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← mem_singleton]
simp [← h]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact pair_eq_singleton y
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_pair_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y, z} ↔ x = y ∧ x = z := by
rw [eq_comm, pair_eq_singleton_iff]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map (PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y))
fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
PSet.mem_sep (p := p ∘ mk) fun _ _ h => (Quotient.sound h).subst
@[simp]
theorem sep_empty (p : ZFSet → Prop) : (∅ : ZFSet).sep p = ∅ :=
(eq_empty _).mpr fun _ h ↦ not_mem_empty _ (mem_sep.mp h).1
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.powerset
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_powerset.trans subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
obtain ⟨γδ, δγ⟩ := hb
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.sUnion
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
define `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := (⋃₀ x).sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z)
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_sUnion.trans
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
unfold sInter
simp only [and_iff_right_iff_imp, mem_sep]
intro mem
apply mem_sUnion.mpr
replace ⟨s, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, h, mem _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := by simp [sInter]
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
instance : IsWellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨mem_wf⟩
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm_of (· ∈ ·)
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl_of (· ∈ ·) x
theorem not_subset_of_mem {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ y) : ¬ y ⊆ x :=
fun h' ↦ mem_irrefl _ (h' h)
theorem not_mem_of_subset {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ⊆ y) : y ∉ x :=
imp_not_comm.2 not_subset_of_mem h
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let r := Definable₁.out f
Quotient.map (PSet.image r)
fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).symm
theorem image.mk (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] (x) {y} : y ∈ x → f y ∈ image f x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => by
simp only [mk_eq, ← Definable₁.mk_out (f := f)]
exact ⟨a, Definable₁.out_equiv f ya⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_image {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, ((Quotient.sound ya).trans Definable₁.mk_out).symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ => e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
/-- The range of a type-indexed family of sets. -/
noncomputable def range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⟦⟨_, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ (equivShrink α).symm⟩⟧
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α} [Small.{u} α] {f : α → ZFSet.{u}} {x : ZFSet.{u}} :
x ∈ range f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨(equivShrink α).symm z, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use equivShrink α z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) :
(range f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
(powerset (powerset (x ∪ y))).sep fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := by
intro x x' y y' H
simp_rw [ZFSet.ext_iff, pair, mem_pair] at H
obtain rfl : x = x' := And.left <| by simpa [or_and_left] using (H {x}).1 (Or.inl rfl)
have he : y = x → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
simpa [eq_comm] using H {y, y'}
have hx := H {x, y}
simp_rw [pair_eq_singleton_iff, true_and, or_true, true_iff] at hx
refine ⟨rfl, hx.elim he fun hy ↦ Or.elim ?_ he id⟩
simpa using ZFSet.ext_iff.1 hy y
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by simp [funs, IsFunc]
instance : Definable₁ ({·}) := .mk ({·}) (fun _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ insert := .mk insert (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ pair := by unfold pair; infer_instance
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
def map (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
image fun y => pair y (f y)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
theorem map_unique {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x z : ZFSet.{u}}
(zx : z ∈ x) : ∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, fun y yx => by
let ⟨w, _, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
let ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_injective we
rw [← fy, wz]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_isFunc {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
IsFunc x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨fun ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx =>
let ⟨_, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
fun h =>
⟨fun _ yx =>
let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
fun _ => map_unique⟩⟩
/-- Given a predicate `p` on ZFC sets. `Hereditarily p x` means that `x` has property `p` and the
members of `x` are all `Hereditarily p`. -/
def Hereditarily (p : ZFSet → Prop) (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y
termination_by x
section Hereditarily
variable {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}}
theorem hereditarily_iff : Hereditarily p x ↔ p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y := by
rw [← Hereditarily]
alias ⟨Hereditarily.def, _⟩ := hereditarily_iff
theorem Hereditarily.self (h : x.Hereditarily p) : p x :=
h.def.1
theorem Hereditarily.mem (h : x.Hereditarily p) (hy : y ∈ x) : y.Hereditarily p :=
h.def.2 _ hy
theorem Hereditarily.empty : Hereditarily p x → p ∅ := by
apply @ZFSet.inductionOn _ x
intro y IH h
rcases ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty y with (rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· exact h.self
· exact IH a ha (h.mem ha)
end Hereditarily
end ZFSet
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,021 | 1,024 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Theodore Hwa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Junyan Xu, Theodore Hwa
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Hydra
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Basic
/-!
### Surreal multiplication
In this file, we show that multiplication of surreal numbers is well-defined, and thus the
surreal numbers form a linear ordered commutative ring.
An inductive argument proves the following three main theorems:
* P1: being numeric is closed under multiplication,
* P2: multiplying a numeric pregame by equivalent numeric pregames results in equivalent pregames,
* P3: the product of two positive numeric pregames is positive (`mul_pos`).
This is Theorem 8 in [Conway2001], or Theorem 3.8 in [SchleicherStoll]. P1 allows us to define
multiplication as an operation on numeric pregames, P2 says that this is well-defined as an
operation on the quotient by `PGame.Equiv`, namely the surreal numbers, and P3 is an axiom that
needs to be satisfied for the surreals to be a `OrderedRing`.
We follow the proof in [SchleicherStoll], except that we use the well-foundedness of
the hydra relation `CutExpand` on `Multiset PGame` instead of the argument based
on a depth function in the paper.
In the argument, P3 is stated with four variables `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `y₂` satisfying `x₁ < x₂` and
`y₁ < y₂`, and says that `x₁ * y₂ + x₂ * x₁ < x₁ * y₁ + x₂ * y₂`, which is equivalent to
`0 < x₂ - x₁ → 0 < y₂ - y₁ → 0 < (x₂ - x₁) * (y₂ - y₁)`, i.e.
`@mul_pos PGame _ (x₂ - x₁) (y₂ - y₁)`. It has to be stated in this form and not in terms of
`mul_pos` because we need to show P1, P2 and (a specialized form of) P3 simultaneously, and
for example `P1 x y` will be deduced from P3 with variables taking values simpler than `x` or `y`
(among other induction hypotheses), but if you subtract two pregames simpler than `x` or `y`,
the result may no longer be simpler.
The specialized version of P3 is called P4, which takes only three arguments `x₁`, `x₂`, `y` and
requires that `y₂ = y` or `-y` and that `y₁` is a left option of `y₂`. After P1, P2 and P4 are
shown, a further inductive argument (this time using the `GameAdd` relation) proves P3 in full.
Implementation strategy of the inductive argument: we
* extract specialized versions (`IH1`, `IH2`, `IH3`, `IH4` and `IH24`) of the induction hypothesis
that are easier to apply (taking `IsOption` arguments directly), and
* show they are invariant under certain symmetries (permutation and negation of arguments) and that
the induction hypothesis indeed implies the specialized versions.
* utilize the symmetries to minimize calculation.
The whole proof features a clear separation into lemmas of different roles:
* verification of symmetry properties of P and IH (`P3_comm`, `ih1_neg_left`, etc.),
* calculations that connect P1, P2, P3, and inequalities between the product of
two surreals and its options (`mulOption_lt_iff_P1`, etc.),
* specializations of the induction hypothesis
(`numeric_option_mul`, `ih1`, `ih1_swap`, `ih₁₂`, `ih4`, etc.),
* application of specialized induction hypothesis
(`P1_of_ih`, `mul_right_le_of_equiv`, `P3_of_lt`, etc.).
## References
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][Conway2001]
* [Schleicher, Stoll, *An introduction to Conway's games and numbers*][SchleicherStoll]
-/
universe u
open SetTheory Game PGame WellFounded
namespace Surreal.Multiplication
/-- The nontrivial part of P1 in [SchleicherStoll] says that the left options of `x * y` are less
than the right options, and this is the general form of these statements. -/
def P1 (x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ : PGame) :=
⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₂⟧ - ⟦x₁ * y₂⟧ < ⟦x₃ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₃⟧ - (⟦x₃ * y₃⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P2, without numericity assumptions. -/
def P2 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) := x₁ ≈ x₂ → ⟦x₁ * y⟧ = (⟦x₂ * y⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P3, without the `x₁ < x₂` and `y₁ < y₂` assumptions. -/
def P3 (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : PGame) := ⟦x₁ * y₂⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₁⟧ < ⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ + (⟦x₂ * y₂⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P4, without numericity assumptions. In the references, the second part of the
conjunction is stated as `∀ j, P3 x₁ x₂ y (y.moveRight j)`, which is equivalent to our statement
by `P3_comm` and `P3_neg`. We choose to state everything in terms of left options for uniform
treatment. -/
def P4 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) :=
x₁ < x₂ → (∀ i, P3 x₁ x₂ (y.moveLeft i) y) ∧ ∀ j, P3 x₁ x₂ ((-y).moveLeft j) (-y)
/-- The conjunction of P2 and P4. -/
def P24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop := P2 x₁ x₂ y ∧ P4 x₁ x₂ y
variable {x x₁ x₂ x₃ x' y y₁ y₂ y₃ y' : PGame.{u}}
/-! #### Symmetry properties of P1, P2, P3, and P4 -/
lemma P3_comm : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ ↔ P3 y₁ y₂ x₁ x₂ := by
rw [P3, P3, add_comm]
congr! 2 <;> rw [quot_mul_comm]
| lemma P3.trans (h₁ : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (h₂ : P3 x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂) : P3 x₁ x₃ y₁ y₂ := by
rw [P3] at h₁ h₂
rw [P3, ← add_lt_add_iff_left (⟦x₂ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₂⟧)]
convert add_lt_add h₁ h₂ using 1 <;> abel
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Multiplication.lean | 100 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `atTop`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α` to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `TendstoUniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.continuousOn`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `TendstoUniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `TendstoUniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
Finally, we introduce the notion of a uniform Cauchy sequence, which is to uniform
convergence what a Cauchy sequence is to the usual notion of convergence.
## Implementation notes
We derive most of our initial results from an auxiliary definition `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter`.
This definition in and of itself can sometimes be useful, e.g., when studying the local behavior
of the `Fₙ` near a point, which would typically look like `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓝 x)`.
Still, while this may be the "correct" definition (see
`tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter`), it is somewhat unwieldy to work with in
practice. Thus, we provide the more traditional definition in `TendstoUniformlyOn`.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set Uniform
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f`
with respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has
`p ×ˢ p'`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
/--
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ p'` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `p'`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ 𝓟 s` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `s`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ ⊤` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hx : 𝓟 {x} ≤ p') : Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.mpr fun u hu => mem_map.mpr ?_
filter_upwards [(h u hu).curry]
intro i h
simpa using h.filter_mono hx
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| hx)
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at le_top
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p'' p' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p'' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p.prod_mono_right hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.mono (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s' :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr h'))
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', F n.fst n.snd = F' n.fst n.snd) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f p p' := by
refine fun u hu => ((hf u hu).and hff').mono fun n h => ?_
rw [← h.right]
exact h.left
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n in p, Set.EqOn (F n) (F' n) s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at hf ⊢
refine hf.congr ?_
rw [eventually_iff] at hff' ⊢
simp only [Set.EqOn] at hff'
simp only [mem_prod_principal, hff', mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendstoUniformly_congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hF : F =ᶠ[p] F') :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformly F' f p := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ] at *
have HF := EventuallyEq.exists_mem hF
exact ⟨fun h => h.congr (by aesop), fun h => h.congr (by simp_rw [eqOn_comm]; aesop)⟩
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right {g : α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hfg : EqOn f g s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F g p s := fun u hu => by
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with i hi a ha using hfg ha ▸ hi a ha
protected theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMap tendsto_comap)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [TendstoUniformlyOn, comap_principal] using TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp h g
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.comp (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [principal_univ, comap_principal] using h.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p p' := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p s := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {q : Filter ι'} {q' : Filter α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q q') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ q)
(p' ×ˢ q') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h h' ⊢
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, ← map_swap4_prod, tendsto_map'_iff]
simpa using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s') :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p')
(s ×ˢ s') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h h' ⊢
simpa only [prod_principal_principal] using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p') := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, ← univ_prod_univ] at *
exact h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod_map := TendstoUniformly.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {q : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ q) p' :=
fun u hu => ((h.prodMap h') u hu).diag_of_prod_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk
protected theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p')
s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p') :=
(h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod := TendstoUniformly.prodMk
/-- Uniform convergence on a filter `p'` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ p'`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_filter_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F (fun _ => c) p p' := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]
rfl
/-- Uniform convergence on a set `s` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ 𝓟 s`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_principal_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOn F (fun _ => c) p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in `p ×ˢ ⊤`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_top_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformly F (fun _ => c) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on the empty set is vacuously true -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_empty : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p ∅ := fun u _ => by simp
/-- Uniform convergence on a singleton is equivalent to regular convergence -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_singleton_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p {x} ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x)) := by
simp_rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right, tendsto_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp [mem_prod_principal, preimage]
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(p' : Filter α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p p' := by
simpa only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff] using hg.comp (tendsto_fst (g := p'))
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOn_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(s : Set α) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr (hg.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const (𝓟 s))
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
{V : Set β} {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ V)) (hU : x ∈ U) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F (F x) (𝓝[U] x) V := by
set φ := fun q : α × β => ((x, q.2), q)
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto]
change Tendsto (Prod.map (↿F) ↿F ∘ φ) (𝓝[U] x ×ˢ 𝓟 V) (𝓤 γ)
simp only [nhdsWithin, Filter.prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_assoc, comap_principal, inf_principal]
refine hF.comp (Tendsto.inf ?_ <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun x hx => ⟨⟨hU, hx.2⟩, hx⟩)
simp only [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, (· ∘ ·),
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap]
exact tendsto_comap.prodMk (tendsto_diag_uniformity _ _)
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ (univ : Set β))) :
TendstoUniformly F (F x) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hU]
using hF.tendstoUniformlyOn (mem_of_mem_nhds hU)
theorem UniformContinuous₂.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {f : α → β → γ}
(h : UniformContinuous₂ f) : TendstoUniformly f (f x) (𝓝 x) :=
UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly univ_mem <| by rwa [univ_prod_univ, uniformContinuousOn_univ]
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : (ι × ι) × α in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', (F m.fst.fst m.snd, F m.fst.snd m.snd) ∈ u
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOn (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : ι × ι in p ×ˢ p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (F m.fst x, F m.snd x) ∈ u
theorem uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s ↔ UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [UniformCauchySeqOn, UniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
refine forall₂_congr fun u hu => ?_
rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by rwa [← uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p' := by
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
have := tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((hF t ht).prod_mk (hF t ht))
apply this.diag_of_prod_right.mono
simp only [and_imp, Prod.forall]
intro n1 n2 x hl hr
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (prodMk_mem_compRel (htsymm hl) hr) htmem
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.uniformCauchySeqOn (hF : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s :=
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mpr
hF.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto
(hF : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hF' : ∀ᶠ x : α in p', Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' := by
rcases p.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [TendstoUniformlyOnFilter, bot_prod, eventually_bot, implies_true]
-- Proof idea: |f_n(x) - f(x)| ≤ |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| + |f_m(x) - f(x)|. We choose `n`
-- so that |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| is uniformly small across `s` whenever `m ≥ n`. Then for
-- a fixed `x`, we choose `m` sufficiently large such that |f_m(x) - f(x)| is small.
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
-- We will choose n, x, and m simultaneously. n and x come from hF. m comes from hF'
-- But we need to promote hF' to the full product filter to use it
have hmc : ∀ᶠ x in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x.snd) p (𝓝 (f x.snd)) := by
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ => True, by simp, _, hF', by simp⟩
-- To apply filter operations we'll need to do some order manipulation
rw [Filter.eventually_swap_iff]
have := tendsto_prodAssoc.eventually (tendsto_prod_swap.eventually ((hF t ht).and hmc))
apply this.curry.mono
simp only [Equiv.prodAssoc_apply, eventually_and, eventually_const, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap,
and_imp, Prod.forall]
-- Complete the proof
intro x n hx hm'
refine Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (mem_compRel.mpr ?_) htmem
rw [Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right] at hm'
have := hx.and (hm' ht)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this.exists
exact ⟨F m x, ⟨hm.2, htsymm hm.1⟩⟩
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_tendsto (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(hF' : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(hF.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto hF')
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p'' p' := by
intro u hu
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left (Filter.prod_mono hp hp))
exact this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p'' := fun u hu =>
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono ((p ×ˢ p).prod_mono_right hp)
this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.mono (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hss' : s' ⊆ s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s' := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr hss')
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(g : γ → α) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := fun u hu => by
obtain ⟨pa, hpa, pb, hpb, hpapb⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.mp (hf u hu)
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
refine ⟨pa, hpa, pb ∘ g, ?_, fun hx _ hy => hpapb hx hy⟩
exact eventually_comap.mpr (hpb.mono fun x hx y hy => by simp only [hx, hy, Function.comp_apply])
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (g : γ → α) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
simpa only [UniformCauchySeqOn, comap_principal] using hf.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_uniformCauchySeqOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => g ∘ F n) p s := fun _u hu => hf _ (hg hu)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s') :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (s ×ˢ s') := by
intro u hu
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_prod, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at hu
obtain ⟨v, hv, w, hw, hvw⟩ := hu
simp_rw [mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.map_apply]
rw [← Set.image_subset_iff] at hvw
apply (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((h v hv).prod_mk (h' w hw))).mono
intro x hx a b ha hb
exact hvw ⟨_, mk_mem_prod (hx.1 a ha) (hx.2 b hb), rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformCauchySeqOn.prod_map := UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.fst a, F' i.snd a)) (p ×ˢ p') s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod' {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι → α → β'}
(h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι) a => (F i a, F' i a)) p s := fun u hu =>
have hh : Tendsto (fun x : ι => (x, x)) p (p ×ˢ p) := tendsto_diag
(hh.prodMap hh).eventually ((h.prod h') u hu)
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchy_map [hp : NeBot p] (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Cauchy (map (fun i => F i x) p) := by
simp only [cauchy_map_iff, hp, true_and]
intro u hu
rw [mem_map]
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with p hp using hp x hx
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. See `UniformCauchSeqOn.cauchy_map` for the non-`atTop` case. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchySeq [Nonempty ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
(hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F atTop s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
CauchySeq fun i ↦ F i x :=
hf.cauchy_map (hp := atTop_neBot) hx
section SeqTendsto
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
(h : ∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro u hu
rw [tendsto_prod_iff'] at hu
specialize h (fun n => (u n).fst) hu.1
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMk hu.2)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s)
(u : ℕ → ι) (hu : Tendsto u atTop l) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp ((hu.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk tendsto_snd)
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s :=
⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn, tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn⟩
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_seq_tendstoUniformly {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformly F f l ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformly (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ]
exact tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn
end SeqTendsto
section
variable [NeBot p] {L : ι → β} {ℓ : β}
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_left]
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, Set.preimage, ← eventually_iff]
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hs
have p1 : ∀ᶠ i in p, (L i, ℓ) ∈ t := tendsto_nhds_left.mp h3 ht
have p2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (F i x, L i) ∈ t := by
filter_upwards [h2] with i h2 using tendsto_nhds_left.mp h2 ht
have p3 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (f x, F i x) ∈ t := (h1 t ht).curry
obtain ⟨i, p4, p5, p6⟩ := (p1.and (p2.and p3)).exists
filter_upwards [p5, p6] with x p5 p6 using hts ⟨F i x, p6, L i, p5, p4⟩
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) :=
(h1.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right le_top).tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto h2 h3
end
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 627 | 630 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Dilation
/-!
# Dilation equivalence
In this file we define `DilationEquiv X Y`, a type of bundled equivalences between `X` and Y` such
that `edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y` for some `r : ℝ≥0`, `r ≠ 0`.
We also develop basic API about these equivalences.
## TODO
- Add missing lemmas (compare to other `*Equiv` structures).
- [after-port] Add `DilationEquivInstance` for `IsometryEquiv`.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
open Function Set Filter Bornology
open Dilation (ratio ratio_ne_zero ratio_pos edist_eq)
section Class
variable (F : Type*) (X Y : outParam Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [PseudoEMetricSpace Y]
/-- Typeclass saying that `F` is a type of bundled equivalences such that all `e : F` are
dilations. -/
class DilationEquivClass [EquivLike F X Y] : Prop where
edist_eq' : ∀ f : F, ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : X, edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y
instance (priority := 100) [EquivLike F X Y] [DilationEquivClass F X Y] : DilationClass F X Y :=
{ inferInstanceAs (FunLike F X Y), ‹DilationEquivClass F X Y› with }
end Class
/-- Type of equivalences `X ≃ Y` such that `∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y` for some
`r : ℝ≥0`, `r ≠ 0`. -/
structure DilationEquiv (X Y : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [PseudoEMetricSpace Y]
extends X ≃ Y, Dilation X Y
@[inherit_doc] infixl:25 " ≃ᵈ " => DilationEquiv
namespace DilationEquiv
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [PseudoEMetricSpace Y] [PseudoEMetricSpace Z]
instance : EquivLike (X ≃ᵈ Y) X Y where
coe f := f.1
inv f := f.1.symm
left_inv f := f.left_inv'
right_inv f := f.right_inv'
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ h -; congr; exact DFunLike.ext' h
instance : DilationEquivClass (X ≃ᵈ Y) X Y where
edist_eq' f := f.edist_eq'
@[simp] theorem coe_toEquiv (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : ⇑e.toEquiv = e := rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {e e' : X ≃ᵈ Y} (h : ∀ x, e x = e' x) : e = e' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
/-- Inverse `DilationEquiv`. -/
def symm (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : Y ≃ᵈ X where
toEquiv := e.1.symm
edist_eq' := by
refine ⟨(ratio e)⁻¹, inv_ne_zero <| ratio_ne_zero e, e.surjective.forall₂.2 fun x y ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, coe_toEquiv, edist_eq]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.coe_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (ratio_ne_zero e),
ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (DilationEquiv.symm : (X ≃ᵈ Y) → Y ≃ᵈ X) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) (x : Y) : e (e.symm x) = x := e.right_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) (x : X) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : Y → X := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections DilationEquiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
lemma ratio_toDilation (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : ratio e.toDilation = ratio e := rfl
/-- Identity map as a `DilationEquiv`. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied apply]
def refl (X : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : X ≃ᵈ X where
toEquiv := .refl X
edist_eq' := ⟨1, one_ne_zero, fun _ _ ↦ by simp⟩
@[simp] theorem refl_symm : (refl X).symm = refl X := rfl
@[simp] theorem ratio_refl : ratio (refl X) = 1 := Dilation.ratio_id
/-- Composition of `DilationEquiv`s. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied apply]
def trans (e₁ : X ≃ᵈ Y) (e₂ : Y ≃ᵈ Z) : X ≃ᵈ Z where
toEquiv := e₁.1.trans e₂.1
__ := e₂.toDilation.comp e₁.toDilation
@[simp] theorem refl_trans (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : (refl X).trans e = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_refl (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : e.trans (refl Y) = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_self (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : e.symm.trans e = refl Y :=
DilationEquiv.ext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem self_trans_symm (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : e.trans e.symm = refl X :=
DilationEquiv.ext e.symm_apply_apply
protected theorem surjective (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : Surjective e := e.1.surjective
protected theorem bijective (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : Bijective e := e.1.bijective
protected theorem injective (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : Injective e := e.1.injective
@[simp]
theorem ratio_trans (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) (e' : Y ≃ᵈ Z) : ratio (e.trans e') = ratio e * ratio e' := by
-- If `X` is trivial, then so is `Y`, otherwise we apply `Dilation.ratio_comp'`
by_cases hX : ∀ x y : X, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ∞
· have hY : ∀ x y : Y, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ∞ := e.surjective.forall₂.2 fun x y ↦ by
refine (hX x y).imp (fun h ↦ ?_) fun h ↦ ?_ <;> simp [*, Dilation.ratio_ne_zero]
simp [Dilation.ratio_of_trivial, *]
push_neg at hX
exact (Dilation.ratio_comp' (g := e'.toDilation) (f := e.toDilation) hX).trans (mul_comm _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ratio_symm (e : X ≃ᵈ Y) : ratio e.symm = (ratio e)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by rw [← ratio_trans, symm_trans_self, ratio_refl]
| instance : Group (X ≃ᵈ X) where
mul e e' := e'.trans e
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/DilationEquiv.lean | 135 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Symmetric powers
This file defines symmetric powers of a type. The nth symmetric power
consists of homogeneous n-tuples modulo permutations by the symmetric
group.
The special case of 2-tuples is called the symmetric square, which is
addressed in more detail in `Data.Sym.Sym2`.
TODO: This was created as supporting material for `Sym2`; it
needs a fleshed-out interface.
## Tags
symmetric powers
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Function
/-- The nth symmetric power is n-tuples up to permutation. We define it
as a subtype of `Multiset` since these are well developed in the
library. We also give a definition `Sym.sym'` in terms of vectors, and we
show these are equivalent in `Sym.symEquivSym'`.
-/
def Sym (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) :=
{ s : Multiset α // Multiset.card s = n }
/-- The canonical map to `Multiset α` that forgets that `s` has length `n` -/
@[coe] def Sym.toMultiset {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (s : Sym α n) : Multiset α :=
s.1
instance Sym.hasCoe (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) : CoeOut (Sym α n) (Multiset α) :=
⟨Sym.toMultiset⟩
-- The following instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Sym α n) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq <| Subtype _
/-- This is the `List.Perm` setoid lifted to `Vector`.
See note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev List.Vector.Perm.isSetoid (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) : Setoid (Vector α n) :=
(List.isSetoid α).comap Subtype.val
attribute [local instance] Vector.Perm.isSetoid
-- Copy over the `DecidableRel` instance across the definition.
-- (Although `List.Vector.Perm.isSetoid` is an `abbrev`, `List.isSetoid` is not.)
instance {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] :
DecidableRel (· ≈ · : List.Vector α n → List.Vector α n → Prop) :=
fun _ _ => List.decidablePerm _ _
namespace Sym
variable {α β : Type*} {n n' m : ℕ} {s : Sym α n} {a b : α}
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : Sym α n → Multiset α) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Sym α n} : (s₁ : Multiset α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[ext] theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Sym α n} (h : (s₁ : Multiset α) = ↑s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
coe_injective h
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_coe (s : Sym α n) : s.1 = ↑s :=
rfl
/-- Construct an element of the `n`th symmetric power from a multiset of cardinality `n`.
-/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev mk (m : Multiset α) (h : Multiset.card m = n) : Sym α n :=
⟨m, h⟩
/-- The unique element in `Sym α 0`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def nil : Sym α 0 :=
⟨0, Multiset.card_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : ↑(@Sym.nil α) = (0 : Multiset α) :=
rfl
/-- Inserts an element into the term of `Sym α n`, increasing the length by one.
-/
@[match_pattern]
def cons (a : α) (s : Sym α n) : Sym α n.succ :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, by rw [Multiset.card_cons, s.2]⟩
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ₛ " => cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) (s s' : Sym α n) : a ::ₛ s = a ::ₛ s' ↔ s = s' :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans <| (Multiset.cons_inj_right _).trans Subtype.ext_iff.symm
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_left (a a' : α) (s : Sym α n) : a ::ₛ s = a' ::ₛ s ↔ a = a' :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans <| Multiset.cons_inj_left _
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : Sym α n) : a ::ₛ b ::ₛ s = b ::ₛ a ::ₛ s :=
Subtype.ext <| Multiset.cons_swap a b s.1
theorem coe_cons (s : Sym α n) (a : α) : (a ::ₛ s : Multiset α) = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
/-- This is the quotient map that takes a list of n elements as an n-tuple and produces an nth
symmetric power.
-/
def ofVector : List.Vector α n → Sym α n :=
fun x => ⟨↑x.val, (Multiset.coe_card _).trans x.2⟩
/-- This is the quotient map that takes a list of n elements as an n-tuple and produces an nth
symmetric power.
-/
instance : Coe (List.Vector α n) (Sym α n) where coe x := ofVector x
@[simp]
theorem ofVector_nil : ↑(Vector.nil : List.Vector α 0) = (Sym.nil : Sym α 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofVector_cons (a : α) (v : List.Vector α n) :
↑(Vector.cons a v) = a ::ₛ (↑v : Sym α n) := by
cases v
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_coe : Multiset.card (s : Multiset α) = n := s.prop
/-- `α ∈ s` means that `a` appears as one of the factors in `s`.
-/
instance : Membership α (Sym α n) :=
⟨fun s a => a ∈ s.1⟩
instance decidableMem [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Sym α n) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
s.1.decidableMem _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Multiset α) (h : Multiset.card s = n) : mk s h = s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk (a : α) (s : Multiset α) (h : Multiset.card s = n) : a ∈ mk s h ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
lemma «forall» {p : Sym α n → Prop} :
(∀ s : Sym α n, p s) ↔ ∀ (s : Multiset α) (hs : Multiset.card s = n), p (Sym.mk s hs) := by
simp [Sym]
lemma «exists» {p : Sym α n → Prop} :
(∃ s : Sym α n, p s) ↔ ∃ (s : Multiset α) (hs : Multiset.card s = n), p (Sym.mk s hs) := by
simp [Sym]
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : ¬ a ∈ (nil : Sym α 0) :=
Multiset.not_mem_zero a
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons : a ∈ b ::ₛ s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe : a ∈ (s : Multiset α) ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b ::ₛ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem h
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Sym α n) : a ∈ a ::ₛ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self a s.1
theorem cons_of_coe_eq (a : α) (v : List.Vector α n) : a ::ₛ (↑v : Sym α n) = ↑(a ::ᵥ v) :=
Subtype.ext <| by
cases v
rfl
open scoped List in
theorem sound {a b : List.Vector α n} (h : a.val ~ b.val) : (↑a : Sym α n) = ↑b :=
Subtype.ext <| Quotient.sound h
/-- `erase s a h` is the sym that subtracts 1 from the
multiplicity of `a` if a is present in the sym. -/
def erase [DecidableEq α] (s : Sym α (n + 1)) (a : α) (h : a ∈ s) : Sym α n :=
⟨s.val.erase a, (Multiset.card_erase_of_mem h).trans <| s.property.symm ▸ n.pred_succ⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_mk [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α)
(hc : Multiset.card m = n + 1) (a : α) (h : a ∈ m) :
(mk m hc).erase a h =mk (m.erase a)
(by rw [Multiset.card_erase_of_mem h, hc, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_erase [DecidableEq α] {s : Sym α n.succ} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
(s.erase a h : Multiset α) = Multiset.erase s a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_erase [DecidableEq α] {s : Sym α n.succ} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ::ₛ s.erase a h = s :=
coe_injective <| Multiset.cons_erase h
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_head [DecidableEq α] (s : Sym α n) (a : α)
(h : a ∈ a ::ₛ s := mem_cons_self a s) : (a ::ₛ s).erase a h = s :=
coe_injective <| Multiset.erase_cons_head a s.1
/-- Another definition of the nth symmetric power, using vectors modulo permutations. (See `Sym`.)
-/
def Sym' (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) :=
Quotient (Vector.Perm.isSetoid α n)
/-- This is `cons` but for the alternative `Sym'` definition.
-/
def cons' {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} : α → Sym' α n → Sym' α (Nat.succ n) := fun a =>
Quotient.map (Vector.cons a) fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h => List.Perm.cons _ h
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation a " :: " b => cons' a b
/-- Multisets of cardinality n are equivalent to length-n vectors up to permutations.
-/
def symEquivSym' {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} : Sym α n ≃ Sym' α n :=
Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype _ _ (fun _ => by rfl) fun _ _ => by rfl
theorem cons_equiv_eq_equiv_cons (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s : Sym α n) :
(a::symEquivSym' s) = symEquivSym' (a ::ₛ s) := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, _⟩
rfl
instance instZeroSym : Zero (Sym α 0) :=
⟨⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem toMultiset_zero : toMultiset (0 : Sym α 0) = 0 := rfl
instance : EmptyCollection (Sym α 0) :=
⟨0⟩
theorem eq_nil_of_card_zero (s : Sym α 0) : s = nil :=
Subtype.ext <| Multiset.card_eq_zero.1 s.2
instance uniqueZero : Unique (Sym α 0) :=
⟨⟨nil⟩, eq_nil_of_card_zero⟩
/-- `replicate n a` is the sym containing only `a` with multiplicity `n`. -/
def replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Sym α n :=
⟨Multiset.replicate n a, Multiset.card_replicate _ _⟩
theorem replicate_succ {a : α} {n : ℕ} : replicate n.succ a = a ::ₛ replicate n a :=
rfl
theorem coe_replicate : (replicate n a : Multiset α) = Multiset.replicate n a :=
rfl
theorem val_replicate : (replicate n a).val = Multiset.replicate n a := by
rw [val_eq_coe, coe_replicate]
@[simp]
theorem mem_replicate : b ∈ replicate n a ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_iff : s = replicate n a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a := by
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, val_replicate, Multiset.eq_replicate]
exact and_iff_right s.2
theorem exists_mem (s : Sym α n.succ) : ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
Multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem.1 <| s.2.symm ▸ n.succ_pos
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : Sym α (n + 1)} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ t, s = a ::ₛ t := by
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := Multiset.exists_cons_of_mem h
have : Multiset.card m = n := by
apply_fun Multiset.card at h
rw [s.2, Multiset.card_cons, add_left_inj] at h
exact h.symm
use ⟨m, this⟩
apply Subtype.ext
exact h
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_succ (s : Sym α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (s' : Sym α n), s = a ::ₛ s' := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_mem s
classical exact ⟨a, s.erase a ha, (cons_erase ha).symm⟩
theorem eq_replicate {a : α} {n : ℕ} {s : Sym α n} : s = replicate n a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans <| Multiset.eq_replicate.trans <| and_iff_right s.prop
theorem eq_replicate_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (a : α) {n : ℕ} (s : Sym α n) :
s = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2 fun _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
instance [Subsingleton α] (n : ℕ) : Subsingleton (Sym α n) :=
⟨by
cases n
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· intro s s'
obtain ⟨b, -⟩ := exists_mem s
rw [eq_replicate_of_subsingleton b s', eq_replicate_of_subsingleton b s]⟩
instance inhabitedSym [Inhabited α] (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Sym α n) :=
⟨replicate n default⟩
instance inhabitedSym' [Inhabited α] (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Sym' α n) :=
⟨Quotient.mk' (List.Vector.replicate n default)⟩
instance (n : ℕ) [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (Sym α n.succ) :=
⟨fun s => by
obtain ⟨a, -⟩ := exists_mem s
exact isEmptyElim a⟩
instance (n : ℕ) [Unique α] : Unique (Sym α n) :=
Unique.mk' _
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans (Multiset.replicate_right_inj h)
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (replicate n : α → Sym α n) := fun _ _ => (replicate_right_inj h).1
instance (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial α] : Nontrivial (Sym α (n + 1)) :=
(replicate_right_injective n.succ_ne_zero).nontrivial
/-- A function `α → β` induces a function `Sym α n → Sym β n` by applying it to every element of
the underlying `n`-tuple. -/
def map {n : ℕ} (f : α → β) (x : Sym α n) : Sym β n :=
⟨x.val.map f, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {n : ℕ} {f : α → β} {b : β} {l : Sym α n} :
b ∈ Sym.map f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
/-- Note: `Sym.map_id` is not simp-normal, as simp ends up unfolding `id` with `Sym.map_congr` -/
@[simp]
theorem map_id' {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (s : Sym α n) : Sym.map (fun x : α => x) s = s := by
ext; simp only [map, Multiset.map_id', ← val_eq_coe]
theorem map_id {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (s : Sym α n) : Sym.map id s = s := by
ext; simp only [map, id_eq, Multiset.map_id', ← val_eq_coe]
@[simp]
theorem map_map {α β γ : Type*} {n : ℕ} (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Sym α n) :
Sym.map g (Sym.map f s) = Sym.map (g ∘ f) s :=
Subtype.ext <| by dsimp only [Sym.map]; simp
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : Sym.map f (0 : Sym α 0) = (0 : Sym β 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_cons {n : ℕ} (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Sym α n) : (a ::ₛ s).map f = f a ::ₛ s.map f :=
ext <| Multiset.map_cons _ _ _
@[congr]
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Sym α n} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) : map f s = map g s :=
Subtype.ext <| Multiset.map_congr rfl h
@[simp]
theorem map_mk {f : α → β} {m : Multiset α} {hc : Multiset.card m = n} :
map f (mk m hc) = mk (m.map f) (by simp [hc]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (s : Sym α n) (f : α → β) : ↑(s.map f) = Multiset.map f s :=
rfl
theorem map_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (n : ℕ) :
Injective (map f : Sym α n → Sym β n) := fun _ _ h =>
coe_injective <| Multiset.map_injective hf <| coe_inj.2 h
/-- Mapping an equivalence `α ≃ β` using `Sym.map` gives an equivalence between `Sym α n` and
`Sym β n`. -/
@[simps]
def equivCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Sym α n ≃ Sym β n where
toFun := map e
invFun := map e.symm
left_inv x := by rw [map_map, Equiv.symm_comp_self, map_id]
right_inv x := by rw [map_map, Equiv.self_comp_symm, map_id]
/-- "Attach" a proof that `a ∈ s` to each element `a` in `s` to produce
an element of the symmetric power on `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : Sym α n) : Sym { x // x ∈ s } n :=
⟨s.val.attach, by (conv_rhs => rw [← s.2, ← Multiset.card_attach])⟩
@[simp]
theorem attach_mk {m : Multiset α} {hc : Multiset.card m = n} :
attach (mk m hc) = mk m.attach (Multiset.card_attach.trans hc) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_attach (s : Sym α n) : (s.attach : Multiset { a // a ∈ s }) =
Multiset.attach (s : Multiset α) :=
rfl
theorem attach_map_coe (s : Sym α n) : s.attach.map (↑) = s :=
coe_injective <| Multiset.attach_map_val _
@[simp]
theorem mem_attach (s : Sym α n) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : x ∈ s.attach :=
Multiset.mem_attach _ _
@[simp]
theorem attach_nil : (nil : Sym α 0).attach = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_cons (x : α) (s : Sym α n) :
(cons x s).attach =
cons ⟨x, mem_cons_self _ _⟩ (s.attach.map fun x => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem x.prop⟩) :=
coe_injective <| Multiset.attach_cons _ _
/-- Change the length of a `Sym` using an equality.
The simp-normal form is for the `cast` to be pushed outward. -/
protected def cast {n m : ℕ} (h : n = m) : Sym α n ≃ Sym α m where
toFun s := ⟨s.val, s.2.trans h⟩
invFun s := ⟨s.val, s.2.trans h.symm⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_rfl : Sym.cast rfl s = s :=
Subtype.ext rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_cast {n'' : ℕ} (h : n = n') (h' : n' = n'') :
Sym.cast h' (Sym.cast h s) = Sym.cast (h.trans h') s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_cast (h : n = m) : (Sym.cast h s : Multiset α) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cast (h : n = m) : a ∈ Sym.cast h s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Append a pair of `Sym` terms. -/
def append (s : Sym α n) (s' : Sym α n') : Sym α (n + n') :=
⟨s.1 + s'.1, by rw [Multiset.card_add, s.2, s'.2]⟩
@[simp]
theorem append_inj_right (s : Sym α n) {t t' : Sym α n'} : s.append t = s.append t' ↔ t = t' :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans <| (add_right_inj _).trans Subtype.ext_iff.symm
@[simp]
theorem append_inj_left {s s' : Sym α n} (t : Sym α n') : s.append t = s'.append t ↔ s = s' :=
Subtype.ext_iff.trans <| (add_left_inj _).trans Subtype.ext_iff.symm
theorem append_comm (s : Sym α n') (s' : Sym α n') :
s.append s' = Sym.cast (add_comm _ _) (s'.append s) := by
ext
simp [append, add_comm]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_append (s : Sym α n) (s' : Sym α n') : (s.append s' : Multiset α) = s + s' :=
rfl
theorem mem_append_iff {s' : Sym α m} : a ∈ s.append s' ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ s' :=
Multiset.mem_add
/-- `a ↦ {a}` as an equivalence between `α` and `Sym α 1`. -/
@[simps apply]
def oneEquiv : α ≃ Sym α 1 where
toFun a := ⟨{a}, by simp⟩
invFun s := (Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype
(·.length = 1) _ (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl) (fun l l' ↦ by rfl) s).liftOn
(fun l ↦ l.1.head <| List.length_pos_iff.mp <| by simp)
fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ fun perm ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := List.length_eq_one_iff.mp h
exact List.eq_of_mem_singleton (perm.mem_iff.mp <| List.head_mem _)
left_inv a := by rfl
right_inv := by rintro ⟨⟨l⟩, h⟩; obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := List.length_eq_one_iff.mp h; rfl
/-- Fill a term `m : Sym α (n - i)` with `i` copies of `a` to obtain a term of `Sym α n`.
This is a convenience wrapper for `m.append (replicate i a)` that adjusts the term using
`Sym.cast`. -/
def fill (a : α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (m : Sym α (n - i)) : Sym α n :=
Sym.cast (Nat.sub_add_cancel i.is_le) (m.append (replicate i a))
theorem coe_fill {a : α} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {m : Sym α (n - i)} :
(fill a i m : Multiset α) = m + replicate i a :=
rfl
theorem mem_fill_iff {a b : α} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {s : Sym α (n - i)} :
a ∈ Sym.fill b i s ↔ (i : ℕ) ≠ 0 ∧ a = b ∨ a ∈ s := by
rw [fill, mem_cast, mem_append_iff, or_comm, mem_replicate]
open Multiset
/-- Remove every `a` from a given `Sym α n`.
Yields the number of copies `i` and a term of `Sym α (n - i)`. -/
def filterNe [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (m : Sym α n) : Σ i : Fin (n + 1), Sym α (n - i) :=
⟨⟨m.1.count a, (count_le_card _ _).trans_lt <| by rw [m.2, Nat.lt_succ_iff]⟩,
m.1.filter (a ≠ ·),
Nat.eq_sub_of_add_eq <|
Eq.trans
(by
rw [← countP_eq_card_filter, add_comm]
simp only [eq_comm, Ne, count]
rw [← card_eq_countP_add_countP _ _])
m.2⟩
theorem sigma_sub_ext {m₁ m₂ : Σ i : Fin (n + 1), Sym α (n - i)} (h : (m₁.2 : Multiset α) = m₂.2) :
m₁ = m₂ :=
Sigma.subtype_ext
(Fin.ext <| by
rw [← Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_of_lt_succ m₁.1.is_lt), ← m₁.2.2, val_eq_coe, h,
← val_eq_coe, m₂.2.2, Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_of_lt_succ m₂.1.is_lt)])
h
theorem fill_filterNe [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (m : Sym α n) :
(m.filterNe a).2.fill a (m.filterNe a).1 = m :=
Sym.ext
(by
rw [coe_fill, filterNe, ← val_eq_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Fin.val_mk]
ext b; dsimp
rw [count_add, count_filter, Sym.coe_replicate, count_replicate]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a b
· rw [if_pos rfl, if_neg (not_not.2 rfl), zero_add]
· rw [if_pos h, if_neg h, add_zero])
theorem filter_ne_fill
[DecidableEq α] (a : α) (m : Σ i : Fin (n + 1), Sym α (n - i)) (h : a ∉ m.2) :
(m.2.fill a m.1).filterNe a = m :=
sigma_sub_ext
(by
rw [filterNe, ← val_eq_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, val_eq_coe, coe_fill]
rw [filter_add, filter_eq_self.2, add_eq_left, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem]
· intro b hb
rw [mem_filter, Sym.mem_coe, mem_replicate] at hb
exact hb.2 hb.1.2.symm
· exact fun a ha ha' => h <| ha'.symm ▸ ha)
theorem count_coe_fill_self_of_not_mem [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {s : Sym α (n - i)}
(hx : a ∉ s) :
count a (fill a i s : Multiset α) = i := by
simp [coe_fill, coe_replicate, hx]
theorem count_coe_fill_of_ne [DecidableEq α] {a x : α} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {s : Sym α (n - i)}
(hx : x ≠ a) :
count x (fill a i s : Multiset α) = count x s := by
suffices x ∉ Multiset.replicate i a by simp [coe_fill, coe_replicate, this]
simp [Multiset.mem_replicate, hx]
end Sym
section Equiv
/-! ### Combinatorial equivalences -/
variable {α : Type*} {n : ℕ}
open Sym
namespace SymOptionSuccEquiv
/-- Function from the symmetric product over `Option` splitting on whether or not
it contains a `none`. -/
def encode [DecidableEq α] (s : Sym (Option α) n.succ) : Sym (Option α) n ⊕ Sym α n.succ :=
if h : none ∈ s then Sum.inl (s.erase none h)
else
Sum.inr
(s.attach.map fun o =>
o.1.get <| Option.ne_none_iff_isSome.1 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem o.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem encode_of_none_mem [DecidableEq α] (s : Sym (Option α) n.succ) (h : none ∈ s) :
encode s = Sum.inl (s.erase none h) :=
dif_pos h
@[simp]
theorem encode_of_not_none_mem [DecidableEq α] (s : Sym (Option α) n.succ) (h : ¬none ∈ s) :
encode s =
Sum.inr
(s.attach.map fun o =>
o.1.get <| Option.ne_none_iff_isSome.1 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem o.2 h) :=
dif_neg h
|
/-- Inverse of `Sym_option_succ_equiv.decode`. -/
def decode : Sym (Option α) n ⊕ Sym α n.succ → Sym (Option α) n.succ
| Sum.inl s => none ::ₛ s
| Sum.inr s => s.map Embedding.some
@[simp]
theorem decode_inl (s : Sym (Option α) n) : decode (Sum.inl s) = none ::ₛ s :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Sym/Basic.lean | 594 | 603 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm _ _ := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := abs_sub_le _ _ _
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
exact Or.inl (le_refl _)
theorem Real.ball_eq_Ioo (x r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo (x - r) (x + r) :=
Set.ext fun y => by
rw [mem_ball, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_lt_iff, mem_Ioo, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
sub_lt_comm]
theorem Real.closedBall_eq_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closedBall x r = Icc (x - r) (x + r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add',
sub_le_comm]
theorem Real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
theorem Real.Icc_eq_closedBall (x y : ℝ) : Icc x y = closedBall ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
theorem Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
𝓤 α = comap (fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
ext s
simp only [mem_uniformity_dist, (nhds_basis_ball.comap _).mem_iff]
simp [subset_def, Real.dist_0_eq_abs]
theorem tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : ι → α × α} {p : Filter ι} :
Tendsto f p (𝓤 α) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x).1 (f x).2) p (𝓝 0) := by
rw [Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h₁ : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a)) (h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
h₁.congr_uniformity <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
alias tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist := Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist
theorem tendsto_iff_of_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
Uniform.tendsto_congr <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
end Real
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.dist_eq_of_dist_zero (x : α) {y z : α} (h : dist y z = 0) :
dist x y = dist x z :=
dist_comm y x ▸ dist_comm z x ▸ sub_eq_zero.1 (abs_nonpos_iff.1 (h ▸ abs_dist_sub_le y z x))
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_left (x y z : α) : dist (dist x z) (dist y z) ≤ dist x y :=
abs_dist_sub_le ..
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_right (x y z : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x z) ≤ dist y z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using dist_dist_dist_le_left y z x
theorem dist_dist_dist_le (x y x' y' : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x' y') ≤ dist x x' + dist y y' :=
(dist_triangle _ _ _).trans <|
add_le_add (dist_dist_dist_le_left _ _ _) (dist_dist_dist_le_right _ _ _)
theorem nhds_comap_dist (a : α) : ((𝓝 (0 : ℝ)).comap (dist · a)) = 𝓝 a := by
simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity α, Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, comap_comap,
Function.comp_def, dist_comm]
theorem tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a : α} :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun b => dist (f b) a) x (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← nhds_comap_dist a, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
namespace Metric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
theorem ball_subset_interior_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ interior (closedBall x ε) :=
interior_maximal ball_subset_closedBall isOpen_ball
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in pseudometric spaces -/
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm]
theorem mem_closure_range_iff {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < ε := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
theorem mem_closure_range_iff_nat {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1) :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ).trans <| by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm, exists_range_iff, forall_const]
theorem mem_of_closed' {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {a : α} :
a ∈ s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε := by
simpa only [hs.closure_eq] using @mem_closure_iff _ _ s a
theorem dense_iff {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, (ball x r ∩ s).Nonempty :=
forall_congr' fun x => by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_ball', and_comm]
theorem dense_iff_iUnion_ball (s : Set α) : Dense s ↔ ∀ r > 0, ⋃ c ∈ s, ball c r = univ := by
simp_rw [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_ball, Dense, mem_closure_iff,
forall_comm (α := α)]
theorem denseRange_iff {f : β → α} : DenseRange f ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, ∃ y, dist x (f y) < r :=
forall_congr' fun x => by simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
end Metric
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (Additive α) := ‹_›
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹_›
section
| variable [PseudoMetricSpace X]
@[simp] theorem nndist_ofMul (a b : X) : nndist (ofMul a) (ofMul b) = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp] theorem nndist_ofAdd (a b : X) : nndist (ofAdd a) (ofAdd b) = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp] theorem nndist_toMul (a b : Additive X) : nndist a.toMul b.toMul = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem nndist_toAdd (a b : Multiplicative X) : nndist a.toAdd b.toAdd = nndist a b := rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 1,168 | 1,178 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Primitive Element Theorem
In this file we prove the primitive element theorem.
## Main results
- `Field.exists_primitive_element`: a finite separable extension `E / F` has a primitive element,
i.e. there is an `α : E` such that `F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)`.
- `Field.exists_primitive_element_iff_finite_intermediateField`: a finite extension `E / F` has a
primitive element if and only if there exist only finitely many intermediate fields between `E`
and `F`.
## Implementation notes
In declaration names, `primitive_element` abbreviates `adjoin_simple_eq_top`:
it stands for the statement `F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)`. We did not add an extra
declaration `IsPrimitiveElement F α := F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)` because this
requires more unfolding without much obvious benefit.
## Tags
primitive element, separable field extension, separable extension, intermediate field, adjoin,
exists_adjoin_simple_eq_top
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
section PrimitiveElementFinite
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] (E : Type*) [Field E] [Algebra F E]
/-! ### Primitive element theorem for finite fields -/
/-- **Primitive element theorem** assuming E is finite. -/
@[stacks 09HY "second part"]
theorem exists_primitive_element_of_finite_top [Finite E] : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨α, hα⟩ := @IsCyclic.exists_generator Eˣ _ _
use α
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rw [hx]
exact F⟮α.val⟯.zero_mem
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Set.mem_range.mp (hα (Units.mk0 x hx))
rw [show x = α ^ n by norm_cast; rw [hn, Units.val_mk0]]
exact zpow_mem (mem_adjoin_simple_self F (E := E) ↑α) n
/-- Primitive element theorem for finite dimensional extension of a finite field. -/
theorem exists_primitive_element_of_finite_bot [Finite F] [FiniteDimensional F E] :
∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ :=
haveI : Finite E := Module.finite_of_finite F
exists_primitive_element_of_finite_top F E
end PrimitiveElementFinite
/-! ### Primitive element theorem for infinite fields -/
section PrimitiveElementInf
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] [Infinite F] {E : Type*} [Field E] (ϕ : F →+* E) (α β : E)
theorem primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (f g : F[X]) :
∃ c : F, ∀ α' ∈ (f.map ϕ).roots, ∀ β' ∈ (g.map ϕ).roots, -(α' - α) / (β' - β) ≠ ϕ c := by
classical
let sf := (f.map ϕ).roots
let sg := (g.map ϕ).roots
classical
let s := (sf.bind fun α' => sg.map fun β' => -(α' - α) / (β' - β)).toFinset
let s' := s.preimage ϕ fun x _ y _ h => ϕ.injective h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset s'
simp_rw [s', s, Finset.mem_preimage, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Multiset.mem_bind, Multiset.mem_map]
at hc
push_neg at hc
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
variable (F)
variable [Algebra F E]
/-- This is the heart of the proof of the primitive element theorem. It shows that if `F` is
infinite and `α` and `β` are separable over `F` then `F⟮α, β⟯` is generated by a single element. -/
theorem primitive_element_inf_aux [Algebra.IsSeparable F E] : ∃ γ : E, F⟮α, β⟯ = F⟮γ⟯ := by
classical
have hα := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral F α
have hβ := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral F β
let f := minpoly F α
let g := minpoly F β
let ιFE := algebraMap F E
let ιEE' := algebraMap E (SplittingField (g.map ιFE))
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (ιEE'.comp ιFE) (ιEE' α) (ιEE' β) f g
let γ := α + c • β
suffices β_in_Fγ : β ∈ F⟮γ⟯ by
use γ
apply le_antisymm
· rw [adjoin_le_iff]
have α_in_Fγ : α ∈ F⟮γ⟯ := by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right α (c • β)]
exact F⟮γ⟯.sub_mem (mem_adjoin_simple_self F γ) (F⟮γ⟯.toSubalgebra.smul_mem β_in_Fγ c)
rintro x (rfl | rfl) <;> assumption
· rw [adjoin_simple_le_iff]
have α_in_Fαβ : α ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert α {β})
have β_in_Fαβ : β ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert_of_mem α rfl)
exact F⟮α, β⟯.add_mem α_in_Fαβ (F⟮α, β⟯.smul_mem β_in_Fαβ)
classical
let p := EuclideanDomain.gcd ((f.map (algebraMap F F⟮γ⟯)).comp
(C (AdjoinSimple.gen F γ) - (C ↑c : F⟮γ⟯[X]) * X)) (g.map (algebraMap F F⟮γ⟯))
let h := EuclideanDomain.gcd ((f.map ιFE).comp (C γ - C (ιFE c) * X)) (g.map ιFE)
have map_g_ne_zero : g.map ιFE ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero hβ)
have h_ne_zero : h ≠ 0 :=
mt EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_zero_iff.mp (not_and.mpr fun _ => map_g_ne_zero)
suffices p_linear : p.map (algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E) = C h.leadingCoeff * (X - C β) by
have finale : β = algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E (-p.coeff 0 / p.coeff 1) := by
simp [map_div₀, RingHom.map_neg, ← coeff_map, ← coeff_map, p_linear,
mul_sub, coeff_C, mul_div_cancel_left₀ β (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp h_ne_zero)]
rw [finale]
exact Subtype.mem (-p.coeff 0 / p.coeff 1)
have h_sep : h.Separable := separable_gcd_right _ (Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable F β).map
have h_root : h.eval β = 0 := by
apply eval_gcd_eq_zero
· rw [eval_comp, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_C, eval_X, eval_map, ← aeval_def, ←
Algebra.smul_def, add_sub_cancel_right, minpoly.aeval]
· rw [eval_map, ← aeval_def, minpoly.aeval]
have h_splits : Splits ιEE' h :=
splits_of_splits_gcd_right ιEE' map_g_ne_zero (SplittingField.splits _)
have h_roots : ∀ x ∈ (h.map ιEE').roots, x = ιEE' β := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_roots_map h_ne_zero] at hx
specialize hc (ιEE' γ - ιEE' (ιFE c) * x) (by
have f_root := root_left_of_root_gcd hx
rw [eval₂_comp, eval₂_sub, eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_C, eval₂_X, eval₂_map] at f_root
exact (mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero hα)).mpr f_root)
specialize hc x (by
rw [mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero hβ), ← eval₂_map]
exact root_right_of_root_gcd hx)
by_contra a
apply hc
apply (div_eq_iff (sub_ne_zero.mpr a)).mpr
simp only [γ, Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.comp_apply]
ring
rw [← eq_X_sub_C_of_separable_of_root_eq h_sep h_root h_splits h_roots]
trans EuclideanDomain.gcd (?_ : E[X]) (?_ : E[X])
· dsimp only [γ]
convert (gcd_map (algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E)).symm
· simp only [map_comp, Polynomial.map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, Polynomial.map_sub,
map_C, AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen, map_add, Polynomial.map_mul, map_X]
congr
-- If `F` is infinite and `E/F` has only finitely many intermediate fields, then for any
-- `α` and `β` in `E`, `F⟮α, β⟯` is generated by a single element.
-- Marked as private since it's a special case of
-- `exists_primitive_element_of_finite_intermediateField`.
private theorem primitive_element_inf_aux_of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] : ∃ γ : E, F⟮α, β⟯ = F⟮γ⟯ := by
let f : F → IntermediateField F E := fun x ↦ F⟮α + x • β⟯
obtain ⟨x, y, hneq, heq⟩ := Finite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite f
use α + x • β
apply le_antisymm
· rw [adjoin_le_iff]
have αxβ_in_K : α + x • β ∈ F⟮α + x • β⟯ := mem_adjoin_simple_self F _
have αyβ_in_K : α + y • β ∈ F⟮α + y • β⟯ := mem_adjoin_simple_self F _
dsimp [f] at *
simp only [← heq] at αyβ_in_K
have β_in_K := sub_mem αxβ_in_K αyβ_in_K
rw [show (α + x • β) - (α + y • β) = (x - y) • β by rw [sub_smul]; abel1] at β_in_K
replace β_in_K := smul_mem _ β_in_K (x := (x - y)⁻¹)
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_eq_div, div_self (sub_ne_zero.2 hneq), one_smul] at β_in_K
have α_in_K : α ∈ F⟮α + x • β⟯ := by
convert ← sub_mem αxβ_in_K (smul_mem _ β_in_K)
apply add_sub_cancel_right
rintro x (rfl | rfl) <;> assumption
· rw [adjoin_simple_le_iff]
have α_in_Fαβ : α ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert α {β})
have β_in_Fαβ : β ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert_of_mem α rfl)
exact F⟮α, β⟯.add_mem α_in_Fαβ (F⟮α, β⟯.smul_mem β_in_Fαβ)
end PrimitiveElementInf
variable (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E]
variable [Algebra F E]
section SeparableAssumption
variable [FiniteDimensional F E] [Algebra.IsSeparable F E]
/-- **Primitive element theorem**: a finite separable field extension `E` of `F` has a
primitive element, i.e. there is an `α ∈ E` such that `F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)`. -/
@[stacks 030N "The moreover part"]
theorem exists_primitive_element : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty (Fintype F) with (F_inf | ⟨⟨F_finite⟩⟩)
· let P : IntermediateField F E → Prop := fun K => ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = K
have base : P ⊥ := ⟨0, adjoin_zero⟩
have ih : ∀ (K : IntermediateField F E) (x : E), P K → P (K⟮x⟯.restrictScalars F) := by
intro K β hK
obtain ⟨α, hK⟩ := hK
rw [← hK, adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple]
haveI : Infinite F := isEmpty_fintype.mp F_inf
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ := primitive_element_inf_aux F α β
exact ⟨γ, hγ.symm⟩
exact induction_on_adjoin P base ih ⊤
· exact exists_primitive_element_of_finite_bot F E
/-- Alternative phrasing of primitive element theorem:
a finite separable field extension has a basis `1, α, α^2, ..., α^n`.
See also `exists_primitive_element`. -/
noncomputable def powerBasisOfFiniteOfSeparable : PowerBasis F E :=
let α := (exists_primitive_element F E).choose
let pb := adjoin.powerBasis (Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral F α)
have e : F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ := (exists_primitive_element F E).choose_spec
pb.map ((IntermediateField.equivOfEq e).trans IntermediateField.topEquiv)
end SeparableAssumption
section FiniteIntermediateField
-- TODO: show a more generalized result: [F⟮α⟯ : F⟮α ^ m⟯] = m if m > 0 and α transcendental.
theorem isAlgebraic_of_adjoin_eq_adjoin {α : E} {m n : ℕ} (hneq : m ≠ n)
(heq : F⟮α ^ m⟯ = F⟮α ^ n⟯) : IsAlgebraic F α := by
wlog hmn : m < n
· exact this F E hneq.symm heq.symm (hneq.lt_or_lt.resolve_left hmn)
by_cases hm : m = 0
· rw [hm] at heq hmn
simp only [pow_zero, adjoin_one] at heq
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_bot.1 (heq.symm ▸ mem_adjoin_simple_self F (α ^ n))
refine ⟨X ^ n - C y, X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hmn y, ?_⟩
simp only [map_sub, map_pow, aeval_X, aeval_C, h, sub_self]
obtain ⟨r, s, h⟩ := (mem_adjoin_simple_iff F _).1 (heq ▸ mem_adjoin_simple_self F (α ^ m))
by_cases hzero : aeval (α ^ n) s = 0
· simp only [hzero, div_zero, pow_eq_zero_iff hm] at h
exact h.symm ▸ isAlgebraic_zero
replace hm : 0 < m := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hm
rw [eq_div_iff hzero, ← sub_eq_zero] at h
replace hzero : s ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp only [map_zero, not_true_eq_false] at hzero
let f : F[X] := X ^ m * expand F n s - expand F n r
refine ⟨f, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : f.coeff (n * s.natDegree + m) ≠ 0 := by
have hn : 0 < n := by linarith only [hm, hmn]
have hndvd : ¬ n ∣ n * s.natDegree + m := by
rw [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (n.dvd_mul_right s.natDegree)]
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt hm hmn
simp only [f, coeff_sub, coeff_X_pow_mul, s.coeff_expand_mul' hn, coeff_natDegree,
coeff_expand hn r, hndvd, ite_false, sub_zero]
exact leadingCoeff_ne_zero.2 hzero
intro h
simp only [h, coeff_zero, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at this
· simp only [f, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, aeval_X, expand_aeval, h]
theorem isAlgebraic_of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E := ⟨fun α ↦
have ⟨_m, _n, hneq, heq⟩ := Finite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite fun n ↦ F⟮α ^ n⟯
isAlgebraic_of_adjoin_eq_adjoin F E hneq heq⟩
theorem FiniteDimensional.of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] : FiniteDimensional F E := by
let IF := { K : IntermediateField F E // ∃ x, K = F⟮x⟯ }
have := isAlgebraic_of_finite_intermediateField F E
haveI : ∀ K : IF, FiniteDimensional F K.1 := fun ⟨_, x, rfl⟩ ↦ adjoin.finiteDimensional
(Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral _)
have hfin := finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite (t := fun K : IF ↦ K.1)
have htop : ⨆ K : IF, K.1 = ⊤ := le_top.antisymm fun x _ ↦
le_iSup (fun K : IF ↦ K.1) ⟨F⟮x⟯, x, rfl⟩ <| mem_adjoin_simple_self F x
rw [htop] at hfin
exact topEquiv.toLinearEquiv.finiteDimensional
theorem exists_primitive_element_of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] (K : IntermediateField F E) : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = K := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.of_finite_intermediateField F E
rcases finite_or_infinite F with (_ | _)
· obtain ⟨α, h⟩ := exists_primitive_element_of_finite_bot F K
exact ⟨α, by simpa only [lift_adjoin_simple, lift_top] using congr_arg lift h⟩
· apply induction_on_adjoin (fun K ↦ ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = K) ⟨0, adjoin_zero⟩
rintro K β ⟨α, rfl⟩
simp_rw [adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple, eq_comm]
exact primitive_element_inf_aux_of_finite_intermediateField F α β
theorem FiniteDimensional.of_exists_primitive_element [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E]
(h : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤) : FiniteDimensional F E := by
obtain ⟨α, hprim⟩ := h
have hfin := adjoin.finiteDimensional (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (R := F) α)
rw [hprim] at hfin
exact topEquiv.toLinearEquiv.finiteDimensional
-- A finite simple extension has only finitely many intermediate fields
theorem finite_intermediateField_of_exists_primitive_element [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E]
(h : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤) : Finite (IntermediateField F E) := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.of_exists_primitive_element F E h
obtain ⟨α, hprim⟩ := h
-- Let `f` be the minimal polynomial of `α ∈ E` over `F`
let f : F[X] := minpoly F α
let G := { g : E[X] // g.Monic ∧ g ∣ f.map (algebraMap F E) }
-- Then `f` has only finitely many monic factors
have hfin : Finite G := @Finite.of_fintype _ <| fintypeSubtypeMonicDvd
(f.map (algebraMap F E)) <| map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero_of_finite F α)
-- If `K` is an intermediate field of `E/F`, let `g` be the minimal polynomial of `α` over `K`
-- which is a monic factor of `f`
let g : IntermediateField F E → G := fun K ↦
⟨(minpoly K α).map (algebraMap K E), (minpoly.monic <| .of_finite K α).map _, by
convert Polynomial.map_dvd (algebraMap K E) (minpoly.dvd_map_of_isScalarTower F K α)
rw [Polynomial.map_map]; rfl⟩
-- The map `K ↦ g` is injective
have hinj : Function.Injective g := fun K K' heq ↦ by
rw [Subtype.mk.injEq] at heq
apply_fun fun f : E[X] ↦ adjoin F (f.coeffs : Set E) at heq
simpa only [adjoin_minpoly_coeff_of_exists_primitive_element F hprim] using heq
-- Therefore there are only finitely many intermediate fields
exact Finite.of_injective g hinj
/-- **Steinitz theorem**: an algebraic extension `E` of `F` has a
primitive element (i.e. there is an `α ∈ E` such that `F⟮α⟯ = (⊤ : Subalgebra F E)`)
if and only if there exist only finitely many intermediate fields between `E` and `F`. -/
@[stacks 030N "Equivalence of (1) & (2)"]
theorem exists_primitive_element_iff_finite_intermediateField :
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E ∧ ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤) ↔ Finite (IntermediateField F E) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ finite_intermediateField_of_exists_primitive_element F E h,
fun _ ↦ ⟨isAlgebraic_of_finite_intermediateField F E,
exists_primitive_element_of_finite_intermediateField F E _⟩⟩
end FiniteIntermediateField
end Field
variable (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
[FiniteDimensional F E] [Algebra.IsSeparable F E]
@[simp]
theorem AlgHom.card_of_splits (L : Type*) [Field L] [Algebra F L]
(hL : ∀ x : E, (minpoly F x).Splits (algebraMap F L)) :
Fintype.card (E →ₐ[F] L) = finrank F E := by
convert (AlgHom.card_of_powerBasis (L := L) (Field.powerBasisOfFiniteOfSeparable F E)
(Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable _ _) <| hL _).trans
(PowerBasis.finrank _).symm
@[simp]
theorem AlgHom.card (K : Type*) [Field K] [IsAlgClosed K] [Algebra F K] :
Fintype.card (E →ₐ[F] K) = finrank F E :=
AlgHom.card_of_splits _ _ _ (fun _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _)
section iff
namespace Field
open Module IntermediateField Polynomial Algebra Set
variable (F : Type*) {E : Type*} [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] [FiniteDimensional F E]
theorem primitive_element_iff_minpoly_natDegree_eq (α : E) :
F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ ↔ (minpoly F α).natDegree = finrank F E := by
rw [← adjoin.finrank (IsIntegral.of_finite F α), ← finrank_top F E]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_of_le_of_finrank_eq le_top h⟩
exact congr_arg (fun K : IntermediateField F E => finrank F K) h
theorem primitive_element_iff_minpoly_degree_eq (α : E) :
F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ ↔ (minpoly F α).degree = finrank F E := by
rw [degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq, primitive_element_iff_minpoly_natDegree_eq]
exact minpoly.ne_zero_of_finite F α
variable [Algebra.IsSeparable F E] (A : Type*) [Field A] [Algebra F A]
(hA : ∀ x : E, (minpoly F x).Splits (algebraMap F A))
include hA
theorem primitive_element_iff_algHom_eq_of_eval' (α : E) :
F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ ↔ Function.Injective fun φ : E →ₐ[F] A ↦ φ α := by
classical
simp_rw [primitive_element_iff_minpoly_natDegree_eq, ← card_rootSet_eq_natDegree (K := A)
(Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable F α) (hA _), ← toFinset_card,
← (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite F E).range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly_of_splits _ hA α,
| ← AlgHom.card_of_splits F E A hA, Fintype.card, toFinset_range, Finset.card_image_iff,
Finset.coe_univ, ← injective_iff_injOn_univ]
theorem primitive_element_iff_algHom_eq_of_eval (α : E)
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 386 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Opposite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Bilinear
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines the conversion between sesquilinear maps and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂` given a basis define a bilinear map
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'` define the bilinear map on `n → R`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear map
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear map on `n → R`
## TODO
At the moment this is quite a literal port from `Matrix.BilinearForm`. Everything should be
generalized to fully semibilinear forms.
## Tags
Sesquilinear form, Sesquilinear map, matrix, basis
-/
variable {R R₁ S₁ R₂ S₂ M₁ M₂ M₁' M₂' N₂ n m n' m' ι : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
open scoped RightActions
section AuxToLinearMap
variable [Semiring R₁] [Semiring S₁] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring S₂] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
[Module S₁ N₂] [Module S₂ N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ S₁ N₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable (σ₁ : R₁ →+* S₁) (σ₂ : R₂ →+* S₂)
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear maps on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'`. -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m N₂) : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂ :=
-- porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
mk₂'ₛₗ σ₁ σ₂ (fun (v : n → R₁) (w : m → R₂) => ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₂ (w j) • σ₁ (v i) • f i j)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, smul_add, sum_add_distrib, add_smul])
(fun c v w => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_sum, smul_eq_mul, σ₁.map_mul, ← smul_comm _ (σ₁ c),
MulAction.mul_smul])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, sum_add_distrib])
(fun _ v w => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, map_mul, MulAction.mul_smul, smul_sum])
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single (f : Matrix n m N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = f i j := by
rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
have : (∑ i', ∑ j', (if i = i' then (1 : S₁) else (0 : S₁)) •
(if j = j' then (1 : S₂) else (0 : S₂)) • f i' j') =
f i j := by
simp_rw [← Finset.smul_sum]
simp only [op_smul_eq_smul, ite_smul, one_smul, zero_smul, sum_ite_eq, mem_univ, ↓reduceIte]
rw [← this]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by aesop
end AuxToLinearMap
section AuxToMatrix
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring S₁] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring S₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
[Module R N₂] [Module S₁ N₂] [Module S₂ N₂] [SMulCommClass S₁ R N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ R N₂]
[SMulCommClass S₂ S₁ N₂]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* S₁} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* S₂}
variable (R)
/-- The linear map from sesquilinear maps to `Matrix n m N₂` given an `n`-indexed basis for `M₁`
and an `m`-indexed basis for `M₂`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂) :
(M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) →ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ where
toFun f := of fun i j => f (b₁ i) (b₂ j)
map_add' _f _g := rfl
map_smul' _f _g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply (f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂)
(i : n) (j : m) : LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R b₁ b₂ f i j = f (b₁ i) (b₂ j) :=
rfl
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
theorem LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux (f : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R (fun i => Pi.single i 1) (fun j => Pi.single j 1) f) =
f := by
refine ext_basis (Pi.basisFun R₁ n) (Pi.basisFun R₂ m) fun i j => ?_
simp_rw [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single, LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply]
theorem Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m N₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R (fun i => Pi.single i 1)
(fun j => Pi.single j 1) (f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂) =
f := by
ext i j
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single]
end CommSemiring
end AuxToMatrix
section ToMatrix'
/-! ### Bilinear maps over `n → R`
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and sesquilinear maps on `n → R`.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [Module R N₂] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
[Semiring S₁] [Semiring S₂] [Module S₁ N₂] [Module S₂ N₂]
[SMulCommClass S₁ R N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ R N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ S₁ N₂]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* S₁} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* S₂}
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable (R)
/-- The linear equivalence between sesquilinear maps and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' : ((n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R (fun i => Pi.single i 1) (fun j => Pi.single j 1) with
toFun := LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R _ _
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
left_inv := LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux R
right_inv := Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux R }
/-- The linear equivalence between bilinear maps and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂' : ((n → S₁) →ₗ[S₁] (m → S₂) →ₗ[S₂] N₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R
variable (σ₁ σ₂)
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and sesquilinear maps on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' : Matrix n m N₂ ≃ₗ[R] (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R).symm
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and bilinear maps on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂' : Matrix n m N₂ ≃ₗ[R] (n → S₁) →ₗ[S₁] (m → S₂) →ₗ[S₂] N₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R).symm
variable {R}
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq (M : Matrix n m N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ M = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M :=
rfl
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m N₂) (x : n → R₁) (y : m → R₂) :
-- porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (x i) • σ₂ (y j) • M i j := by
rw [toLinearMapₛₗ₂', toMatrixₛₗ₂', LinearEquiv.coe_symm_mk, toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by
rw [smul_comm]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m N₂) (x : n → S₁) (y : m → S₂) :
-- porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, x i • y j • M i j :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by
rw [RingHom.id_apply, RingHom.id_apply, smul_comm]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply' {T : Type*} [CommSemiring T] (M : Matrix n m T) (v : n → T)
(w : m → T) : Matrix.toLinearMap₂' T M v w = dotProduct v (M *ᵥ w) := by
simp_rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply, dotProduct, Matrix.mulVec, dotProduct]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm (w _), ← mul_assoc]
|
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_single (M : Matrix n m N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single σ₁ σ₂ M i j
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SesquilinearForm.lean | 194 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
/-!
# Linear equivalences of tensor products as isometries
These results are separate from the definition of `QuadraticForm.tmul` as that file is very slow.
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticForm.Isometry.tmul`: `TensorProduct.map` as a `QuadraticForm.Isometry`
* `QuadraticForm.tensorComm`: `TensorProduct.comm` as a `QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv`
* `QuadraticForm.tensorAssoc`: `TensorProduct.assoc` as a `QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv`
* `QuadraticForm.tensorRId`: `TensorProduct.rid` as a `QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv`
* `QuadraticForm.tensorLId`: `TensorProduct.lid` as a `QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv`
-/
suppress_compilation
universe uR uM₁ uM₂ uM₃ uM₄
variable {R : Type uR} {M₁ : Type uM₁} {M₂ : Type uM₂} {M₃ : Type uM₃} {M₄ : Type uM₄}
open scoped TensorProduct
open QuadraticMap
namespace QuadraticForm
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃] [AddCommGroup M₄]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄] [Invertible (2 : R)]
@[simp]
theorem tmul_comp_tensorMap
{Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁} {Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂}
{Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃} {Q₄ : QuadraticForm R M₄}
(f : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂) (g : Q₃ →qᵢ Q₄) :
(Q₂.tmul Q₄).comp (TensorProduct.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap) = Q₁.tmul Q₃ := by
have h₁ : Q₁ = Q₂.comp f.toLinearMap := QuadraticMap.ext fun x => (f.map_app x).symm
have h₃ : Q₃ = Q₄.comp g.toLinearMap := QuadraticMap.ext fun x => (g.map_app x).symm
refine (QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse R).injective ?_
ext m₁ m₃ m₁' m₃'
simp [-associated_apply, h₁, h₃, associated_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem tmul_tensorMap_apply
{Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁} {Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂}
{Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃} {Q₄ : QuadraticForm R M₄}
(f : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂) (g : Q₃ →qᵢ Q₄) (x : M₁ ⊗[R] M₃) :
Q₂.tmul Q₄ (TensorProduct.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap x) = Q₁.tmul Q₃ x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (tmul_comp_tensorMap f g) x
namespace Isometry
/-- `TensorProduct.map` for `Quadraticform.Isometry`s -/
def _root_.QuadraticMap.Isometry.tmul
{Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁} {Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂}
{Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃} {Q₄ : QuadraticForm R M₄}
(f : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂) (g : Q₃ →qᵢ Q₄) : (Q₁.tmul Q₃) →qᵢ (Q₂.tmul Q₄) where
toLinearMap := TensorProduct.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap
map_app' := tmul_tensorMap_apply f g
@[simp]
theorem _root_.QuadraticMap.Isometry.tmul_apply
{Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁} {Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂}
{Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃} {Q₄ : QuadraticForm R M₄}
(f : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂) (g : Q₃ →qᵢ Q₄) (x : M₁ ⊗[R] M₃) :
f.tmul g x = TensorProduct.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap x :=
rfl
end Isometry
section tensorComm
@[simp]
theorem tmul_comp_tensorComm (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
(Q₂.tmul Q₁).comp (TensorProduct.comm R M₁ M₂) = Q₁.tmul Q₂ := by
refine (QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse R).injective ?_
ext m₁ m₂ m₁' m₂'
dsimp [-associated_apply]
simp only [associated_tmul, QuadraticMap.associated_comp]
exact mul_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem tmul_tensorComm_apply
(Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (x : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) :
Q₂.tmul Q₁ (TensorProduct.comm R M₁ M₂ x) = Q₁.tmul Q₂ x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (tmul_comp_tensorComm Q₁ Q₂) x
/-- `TensorProduct.comm` preserves tensor products of quadratic forms. -/
@[simps toLinearEquiv]
def tensorComm (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
(Q₁.tmul Q₂).IsometryEquiv (Q₂.tmul Q₁) where
toLinearEquiv := TensorProduct.comm R M₁ M₂
map_app' := tmul_tensorComm_apply Q₁ Q₂
@[simp] lemma tensorComm_apply (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂)
(x : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) :
tensorComm Q₁ Q₂ x = TensorProduct.comm R M₁ M₂ x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma tensorComm_symm (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
(tensorComm Q₁ Q₂).symm = tensorComm Q₂ Q₁ :=
rfl
end tensorComm
section tensorAssoc
@[simp]
theorem tmul_comp_tensorAssoc
(Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃) :
(Q₁.tmul (Q₂.tmul Q₃)).comp (TensorProduct.assoc R M₁ M₂ M₃) = (Q₁.tmul Q₂).tmul Q₃ := by
refine (QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse R).injective ?_
ext m₁ m₂ m₁' m₂' m₁'' m₂''
dsimp [-associated_apply]
simp only [associated_tmul, QuadraticMap.associated_comp]
exact mul_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem tmul_tensorAssoc_apply
(Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃)
(x : (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) ⊗[R] M₃) :
Q₁.tmul (Q₂.tmul Q₃) (TensorProduct.assoc R M₁ M₂ M₃ x) = (Q₁.tmul Q₂).tmul Q₃ x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (tmul_comp_tensorAssoc Q₁ Q₂ Q₃) x
/-- `TensorProduct.assoc` preserves tensor products of quadratic forms. -/
@[simps toLinearEquiv]
def tensorAssoc (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃) :
((Q₁.tmul Q₂).tmul Q₃).IsometryEquiv (Q₁.tmul (Q₂.tmul Q₃)) where
toLinearEquiv := TensorProduct.assoc R M₁ M₂ M₃
map_app' := tmul_tensorAssoc_apply Q₁ Q₂ Q₃
@[simp] lemma tensorAssoc_apply
(Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃)
(x : (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) ⊗[R] M₃) :
tensorAssoc Q₁ Q₂ Q₃ x = TensorProduct.assoc R M₁ M₂ M₃ x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma tensorAssoc_symm_apply
(Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) (Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃)
(x : M₁ ⊗[R] (M₂ ⊗[R] M₃)) :
(tensorAssoc Q₁ Q₂ Q₃).symm x = (TensorProduct.assoc R M₁ M₂ M₃).symm x :=
rfl
end tensorAssoc
| section tensorRId
theorem comp_tensorRId_eq (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) :
Q₁.comp (TensorProduct.rid R M₁) = Q₁.tmul (sq (R := R)) := by
refine (QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse R).injective ?_
ext m₁ m₁'
dsimp [-associated_apply]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/TensorProduct/Isometries.lean | 153 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sets
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
/-!
# Instances for finite types
This file is a collection of basic `Fintype` instances for types such as `Fin`, `Prod` and pi types.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Finset.val_univ_fin (n : ℕ) : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).val = List.finRange n := rfl
/-- See also `nonempty_encodable`, `nonempty_denumerable`. -/
theorem nonempty_fintype (α : Type*) [Finite α] : Nonempty (Fintype α) := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨.ofEquiv _ e.symm⟩
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_castSucc (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.castSucc = {Fin.last n}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_last, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
/- The following three lemmas use `Finset.cons` instead of `insert` and `Finset.map` instead of
`Finset.image` to reduce proof obligations downstream. -/
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons 0 (univ.map ⟨Fin.succ, Fin.succ_injective _⟩) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `Fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_castSuccEmb (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons (Fin.last n) (univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succAbove (n : ℕ) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) = Finset.cons p (univ.map <| Fin.succAboveEmb p) (by simp) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_get [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
Finset.univ.image l.get = l.toFinset := by
simp [univ_image_def]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_getElem' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp only [univ_image_def, List.ofFn_getElem_eq_map]
theorem Fin.univ_image_get' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (f <| l.get ·) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp
@[instance]
def Unique.fintype {α : Type*} [Unique α] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton default
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq (y : α) : Fintype { x // x = y } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp)
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq' (y : α) : Fintype { x // y = x } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp [eq_comm])
theorem Fintype.univ_empty : @univ Empty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.univ_pempty : @univ PEmpty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
instance Unit.fintype : Fintype Unit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton ()
theorem Fintype.univ_unit : @univ Unit _ = {()} :=
rfl
instance PUnit.fintype : Fintype PUnit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton PUnit.unit
theorem Fintype.univ_punit : @univ PUnit _ = {PUnit.unit} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.univ_bool : @univ Bool _ = {true, false} :=
rfl
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodLeft {α β} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty β] : Fintype α :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.fst, fun a => by simp⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodRight {α β} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty α] : Fintype β :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.snd, fun b => by simp⟩
instance ULift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (ULift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift.symm
instance PLift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (PLift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift.symm
instance PLift.fintypeProp (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Fintype (PLift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, fun ⟨h⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
instance Quotient.fintype [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
Fintype (Quotient s) :=
Fintype.ofSurjective Quotient.mk'' Quotient.mk''_surjective
instance PSigma.fintypePropLeft {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Fintype (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : α then Fintype.ofEquiv (β h) ⟨fun x => ⟨h, x⟩, PSigma.snd, fun _ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, fun x => (h x.1).elim⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropRight {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv { a // β a }
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropProp {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, fun ⟨x, y⟩ =>
(h ⟨x, y⟩).elim⟩
instance pfunFintype (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, Fintype (α hp)] :
Fintype (∀ hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then Fintype.ofEquiv (α hp) ⟨fun a _ => a, fun f => f hp, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton fun h => (hp h).elim, fun h => mem_singleton.2
(funext fun x => by contradiction)⟩
section Trunc
/-- For `s : Multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `Trunc α`.
-/
def truncOfMultisetExistsMem {α} (s : Multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → Trunc α :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l h =>
match l, h with
| [], _ => False.elim (by tauto)
| a :: _, _ => Trunc.mk a
/-- A `Nonempty` `Fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfNonemptyFintype (α) [Nonempty α] [Fintype α] : Trunc α :=
truncOfMultisetExistsMem Finset.univ.val (by simp)
/-- By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `Trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def truncSigmaOfExists {α} [Fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
Trunc (Σ'a, P a) :=
@truncOfNonemptyFintype (Σ'a, P a) ((Exists.elim h) fun a ha => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end Trunc
namespace Multiset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem count_univ [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : count a Finset.univ.val = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem Finset.univ.nodup (Finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_val_equiv (e : α ≃ β) :
map e univ.val = univ.val := by
rw [← congr_arg Finset.val (Finset.map_univ_equiv e), Finset.map_val, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
/-- For functions on finite sets, they are bijections iff they map universes into universes. -/
@[simp]
theorem bijective_iff_map_univ_eq_univ (f : α → β) :
f.Bijective ↔ map f (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = univ.val :=
⟨fun bij ↦ congr_arg (·.val) (map_univ_equiv <| Equiv.ofBijective f bij),
fun eq ↦ ⟨
fun a₁ a₂ ↦ inj_on_of_nodup_map (eq.symm ▸ univ.nodup) _ (mem_univ a₁) _ (mem_univ a₂),
fun b ↦ have ⟨a, _, h⟩ := mem_map.mp (eq.symm ▸ mem_univ_val b); ⟨a, h⟩⟩⟩
end Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition to show `exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists`. -/
noncomputable def seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) : ℕ → α
| n =>
Classical.choose
(h
(Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h i)
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m < n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
(h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (f m) (f n) := by
classical
have : Nonempty α := by
rcases h ∅ (by simp) with ⟨y, _⟩
exact ⟨y⟩
choose! F hF using h
have h' : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y := fun s => ⟨F s, hF s⟩
set f := seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h' with hf
have A : ∀ n : ℕ, P (f n) := by
intro n
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
have IH' : ∀ x : Fin n, P (f x) := fun n => IH n.1 n.2
rw [hf, seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
exact
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
(by simp [IH'])).1
refine ⟨f, A, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
conv_rhs => rw [hf]
rw [seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
apply
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)))) (by simp [A])).2
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
symmetric relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m ≠ n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
[IsSymm α r] (h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ Pairwise (r on f) := by
rcases exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists P r h with ⟨f, hf, hf'⟩
refine ⟨f, hf, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | rfl | h)
· exact hf' m n h
· exact (hmn rfl).elim
· unfold Function.onFun
apply symm
exact hf' n m h
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 676 | 677 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
/-!
# Series of a relation
If `r` is a relation on `α` then a relation series of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
variable {α : Type*} (r : Rel α α)
variable {β : Type*} (s : Rel β β)
/--
Let `r` be a relation on `α`, a relation series of `r` of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
structure RelSeries where
/-- The number of inequalities in the series -/
length : ℕ
/-- The underlying function of a relation series -/
toFun : Fin (length + 1) → α
/-- Adjacent elements are related -/
step : ∀ (i : Fin length), r (toFun (Fin.castSucc i)) (toFun i.succ)
namespace RelSeries
instance : CoeFun (RelSeries r) (fun x ↦ Fin (x.length + 1) → α) :=
{ coe := RelSeries.toFun }
/--
For any type `α`, each term of `α` gives a relation series with the right most index to be 0.
-/
@[simps!] def singleton (a : α) : RelSeries r where
length := 0
toFun _ := a
step := Fin.elim0
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (RelSeries r) where
false x := IsEmpty.false (x 0)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (RelSeries r) where
default := singleton r default
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (RelSeries r) :=
Nonempty.map (singleton r) inferInstance
variable {r}
@[ext (iff := false)]
lemma ext {x y : RelSeries r} (length_eq : x.length = y.length)
(toFun_eq : x.toFun = y.toFun ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [length_eq])) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨nx, fx⟩
dsimp only at length_eq toFun_eq
subst length_eq toFun_eq
rfl
lemma rel_of_lt [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i < j) :
r (x i) (x j) :=
(Fin.liftFun_iff_succ r).mpr x.step h
lemma rel_or_eq_of_le [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) :
r (x i) (x j) ∨ x i = x j :=
(Fin.lt_or_eq_of_le h).imp (x.rel_of_lt ·) (by rw [·])
/--
Given two relations `r, s` on `α` such that `r ≤ s`, any relation series of `r` induces a relation
series of `s`
-/
@[simps!]
def ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) : RelSeries s where
length := x.length
toFun := x
step _ := h _ _ <| x.step _
lemma coe_ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) :
(x.ofLE h : _ → _) = x := rfl
/-- Every relation series gives a list -/
def toList (x : RelSeries r) : List α := List.ofFn x
@[simp]
lemma length_toList (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.length = x.length + 1 :=
List.length_ofFn
lemma toList_chain' (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.Chain' r := by
rw [List.chain'_iff_get]
intros i h
convert x.step ⟨i, by simpa [toList] using h⟩ <;> apply List.get_ofFn
lemma toList_ne_nil (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList ≠ [] := fun m =>
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mp m (x 0) <| List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- Every nonempty list satisfying the chain condition gives a relation series -/
@[simps]
def fromListChain' (x : List α) (x_ne_nil : x ≠ []) (hx : x.Chain' r) : RelSeries r where
length := x.length - 1
toFun i := x[Fin.cast (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x_ne_nil) i]
step i := List.chain'_iff_get.mp hx i i.2
/-- Relation series of `r` and nonempty list of `α` satisfying `r`-chain condition bijectively
corresponds to each other. -/
protected def Equiv : RelSeries r ≃ {x : List α | x ≠ [] ∧ x.Chain' r} where
toFun x := ⟨_, x.toList_ne_nil, x.toList_chain'⟩
invFun x := fromListChain' _ x.2.1 x.2.2
left_inv x := ext (by simp [toList]) <| by ext; dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn
right_inv x := by
refine Subtype.ext (List.ext_get ?_ fun n hn1 _ => by dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn)
have := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x.2.1
simp_all [toList]
lemma toList_injective : Function.Injective (RelSeries.toList (r := r)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (RelSeries.Equiv).injective <| Subtype.ext h
-- TODO : build a similar bijection between `RelSeries α` and `Quiver.Path`
end RelSeries
namespace Rel
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class FiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
exists_longest_relSeries : ∃ x : RelSeries r, ∀ y : RelSeries r, y.length ≤ x.length
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of arbitrary
length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class InfiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of
arbitrary length. -/
exists_relSeries_with_length : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ x : RelSeries r, x.length = n
end Rel
namespace RelSeries
/-- The longest relational series when a relation is finite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] : RelSeries r :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose
lemma length_le_length_longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] (x : RelSeries r) :
x.length ≤ (RelSeries.longestOf r).length :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose_spec _
/-- A relation series with length `n` if the relation is infinite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) : RelSeries r :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose
@[simp] lemma length_withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) :
(RelSeries.withLength r n).length = n :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose_spec
section
variable {r} {s : RelSeries r} {x : α}
/-- If a relation on `α` is infinite dimensional, then `α` is nonempty. -/
lemma nonempty_of_infiniteDimensional [r.InfiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α :=
⟨RelSeries.withLength r 0 0⟩
lemma nonempty_of_finiteDimensional [r.FiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α := by
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := (Rel.finiteDimensional_iff r).mp ‹_›
exact ⟨p 0⟩
instance membership : Membership α (RelSeries r) :=
⟨Function.swap (· ∈ Set.range ·)⟩
theorem mem_def : x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ Set.range s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_toList : x ∈ s.toList ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [RelSeries.toList, List.mem_ofFn', RelSeries.mem_def]
theorem subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero (hs : s.length = 0) : {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩ - ⟨j, rfl⟩
congr!
exact finCongr (by rw [hs, zero_add]) |>.injective <| Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) _ _
theorem length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : s.length ≠ 0 :=
fun hs ↦ h.not_subsingleton <| subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs
theorem length_pos_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial h
theorem length_ne_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length ≠ 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨s 0, by simp [mem_def], s 1, by simp [mem_def], fun rid ↦ irrefl (s 0) ?_⟩,
length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial⟩
nth_rw 2 [rid]
convert s.step ⟨0, by omega⟩
ext
simpa [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem length_pos (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : 0 < s.length ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| length_ne_zero irrefl
lemma length_eq_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length = 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_ne_iff, length_ne_zero irrefl, Set.not_nontrivial_iff]
/-- Start of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its head is `a₀`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def head (x : RelSeries r) : α := x 0
/-- End of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its last element is `aₙ`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def last (x : RelSeries r) : α := x <| Fin.last _
lemma apply_last (x : RelSeries r) : x (Fin.last <| x.length) = x.last := rfl
lemma head_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.head ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
lemma last_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.last ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma head_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).head = x := by simp [singleton, head]
@[simp]
lemma last_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).last = x := by simp [singleton, last]
end
variable {r s}
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and `b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ` are two strict series
such that `r aₙ b₀`, then there is a chain of length `n + m + 1` given by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ`.
-/
@[simps length]
def append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + q.length + 1
toFun := Fin.append p q ∘ Fin.cast (by omega)
step i := by
obtain hi | rfl | hi :=
lt_trichotomy i (Fin.castLE (by omega) (Fin.last _ : Fin (p.length + 1)))
· convert p.step ⟨i.1, hi⟩ <;> convert Fin.append_left p q _ <;> rfl
· convert connect
· convert Fin.append_left p q _
· convert Fin.append_right p q _; rfl
· set x := _; set y := _
change r (Fin.append p q x) (Fin.append p q y)
have hx : x = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <|
i.2.trans <| by omega⟩ := by
ext; dsimp [x, y]; rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel']; exact hi
have hy : y = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - p.length, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (le_of_lt hi)
(by exact i.2)⟩ := by
ext
dsimp
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm p.length 1, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel' <| le_of_lt (show p.length < i.1 from hi), add_comm]
rfl
rw [hx, Fin.append_right, hy, Fin.append_right]
convert q.step ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <| by omega⟩
rw [Fin.succ_mk, Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_of_lt hi : p.length ≤ i),
Nat.add_assoc _ 1, add_comm 1, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
exact hi
lemma append_apply_left (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect ((i.castAdd (q.length + 1)).cast (by dsimp; omega)) = p i := by
delta append
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_left _ _ _
lemma append_apply_right (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (q.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect (i.natAdd p.length + 1) = q i := by
delta append
simp only [Fin.coe_natAdd, Nat.cast_add, Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_right _ _ _
ext
simp only [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_natAdd]
conv_rhs => rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, ← add_assoc]
change _ % _ = _
simp only [Nat.add_mod_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_succ_eq_iff_lt]
omega
@[simp] lemma head_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).head = p.head :=
append_apply_left p q connect 0
@[simp] lemma last_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).last = q.last := by
delta last
convert append_apply_right p q connect (Fin.last _)
ext
change _ = _ % _
simp only [append_length, Fin.val_last, Fin.natAdd_last, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod,
Nat.mod_succ]
/--
For two types `α, β` and relation on them `r, s`, if `f : α → β` preserves relation `r`, then an
`r`-series can be pushed out to an `s`-series by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ ↦ f a₀ -s→ f a₁ -s→ ... -s→ f aₙ`
-/
@[simps length]
def map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : RelSeries s where
length := p.length
toFun := f.1.comp p
step := (f.2 <| p.step ·)
@[simp] lemma map_apply (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.map f i = f (p i) := rfl
@[simp] lemma head_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).head = f p.head := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).last = f p.last := rfl
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` is an `r`-series and `a` is such that
`aᵢ -r→ a -r→ a_ᵢ₊₁`, then
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aᵢ -r→ a -r→ aᵢ₊₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`
is another `r`-series
-/
@[simps]
def insertNth (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin p.length) (a : α)
(prev_connect : r (p (Fin.castSucc i)) a) (connect_next : r a (p i.succ)) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + 1
toFun := (Fin.castSucc i.succ).insertNth a p
step m := by
set x := _; set y := _; change r x y
obtain hm | hm | hm := lt_trichotomy m.1 i.1
· convert p.step ⟨m, hm.trans i.2⟩
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· change m.1 + 1 < i.1 + 1; rwa [add_lt_add_iff_right]
simp; rfl
· rw [show x = p m from show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _ by
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· show m.1 < i.1 + 1; exact hm ▸ lt_add_one _
simp]
convert prev_connect
· ext; exact hm
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.succ = i.succ.castSucc by ext; change _ + 1 = _ + 1; rw [hm],
Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
obtain hm | hm := hm
· convert p.step ⟨m.1 - 1, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add (by omega) m.2⟩
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above (h := hm)]
aesop
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp only [Fin.val_succ, Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant, Fin.succ_mk]
congr
exact Fin.ext <| Eq.symm <| Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_trans (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) hm)
· convert connect_next
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.castSucc = i.succ.castSucc from Fin.ext hm.symm, Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· change i.1 + 1 < m.1 + 1; omega
simp only [Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant]
congr; ext; exact hm.symm
/--
A relation series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` of `r` gives a relation series of the reverse of `r`
by reversing the series `aₙ ←r- aₙ₋₁ ←r- ... ←r- a₁ ←r- a₀`.
-/
@[simps length]
def reverse (p : RelSeries r) : RelSeries (fun (a b : α) ↦ r b a) where
length := p.length
toFun := p ∘ Fin.rev
step i := by
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply]
have hi : i.1 + 1 ≤ p.length := by omega
convert p.step ⟨p.length - (i.1 + 1), Nat.sub_lt_self (by omega) hi⟩
· ext; simp
· ext
simp only [Fin.val_rev, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_succ]
omega
@[simp] lemma reverse_apply (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.reverse i = p i.rev := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.last = p.head := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma head_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.head = p.last := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma reverse_reverse {r : Rel α α} (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
ext <;> simp
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `a₀ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a -r→ a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) : RelSeries r :=
(singleton r newHead).append p rel
@[simp] lemma head_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).head = newHead := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).last = p.last := by
delta cons
rw [last_append]
lemma cons_cast_succ (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r a s.head) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
(s.cons a h) (.cast (by simp) (.succ i)) = s i := by
dsimp [cons]
convert append_apply_right (singleton r a) s h i
ext
show i.1 + 1 = _ % _
simpa using (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by simp)).symm
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `aₙ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ a`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) : RelSeries r :=
p.append (singleton r newLast) rel
@[simp] lemma head_snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
(p.snoc newLast rel).head = p.head := by
delta snoc; rw [head_append]
@[simp] lemma last_snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
(p.snoc newLast rel).last = newLast := last_append _ _ _
lemma snoc_cast_castSucc (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r s.last a) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
(s.snoc a h) (.cast (by simp) (.castSucc i)) = s i :=
append_apply_left s (singleton r a) h i
-- This lemma is useful because `last_snoc` is about `Fin.last (p.snoc _ _).length`, but we often
-- see `Fin.last (p.length + 1)` in practice. They are equal by definition, but sometimes simplifier
-- does not pick up `last_snoc`
@[simp] lemma last_snoc' (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
p.snoc newLast rel (Fin.last (p.length + 1)) = newLast := last_append _ _ _
@[simp] lemma snoc_castSucc (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (connect : r s.last a)
(i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : snoc s a connect (Fin.castSucc i) = s i :=
Fin.append_left _ _ i
lemma mem_snoc {p : RelSeries r} {newLast : α} {rel : r p.last newLast} {x : α} :
x ∈ p.snoc newLast rel ↔ x ∈ p ∨ x = newLast := by
simp only [snoc, append, singleton_length, Nat.add_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.cast_refl,
Function.comp_id, mem_def, id_eq, Set.mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact Fin.lastCases (Or.inr <| Fin.append_right _ _ 0) (fun i => Or.inl ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩,
(Fin.append_left _ _ _).symm⟩) i
· intro h
rcases h with (⟨i, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact ⟨i.castSucc, Fin.append_left _ _ _⟩
· exact ⟨Fin.last _, Fin.append_right _ _ 0⟩
/--
If a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ...` has positive length, then `a₁ -r→ ...` is another series
-/
@[simps]
def tail (p : RelSeries r) (len_pos : p.length ≠ 0) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length - 1
toFun := Fin.tail p ∘ (Fin.cast <| Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero len_pos)
step i := p.step ⟨i.1 + 1, Nat.lt_pred_iff.mp i.2⟩
@[simp] lemma head_tail (p : RelSeries r) (len_pos : p.length ≠ 0) :
(p.tail len_pos).head = p 1 := by
show p (Fin.succ _) = p 1
congr
ext
show (1 : ℕ) = (1 : ℕ) % _
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
simpa only [lt_add_iff_pos_left, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma last_tail (p : RelSeries r) (len_pos : p.length ≠ 0) :
(p.tail len_pos).last = p.last := by
show p _ = p _
congr
ext
simp only [tail_length, Fin.val_succ, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_last]
exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (by simpa [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero] using len_pos)
/--
If a series ``a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ``, then `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ₋₁` is
another series -/
@[simps]
def eraseLast (p : RelSeries r) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length - 1
toFun i := p ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.sub_le _ _))⟩
step i := p.step ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (Nat.sub_le _ _)⟩
@[simp] lemma head_eraseLast (p : RelSeries r) : p.eraseLast.head = p.head := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_eraseLast (p : RelSeries r) :
p.eraseLast.last = p ⟨p.length.pred, Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.pred_le _)⟩ := rfl
/-- In a non-trivial series `p`, the last element of `p.eraseLast` is related to `p.last` -/
lemma eraseLast_last_rel_last (p : RelSeries r) (h : p.length ≠ 0) :
r p.eraseLast.last p.last := by
simp only [last, Fin.last, eraseLast_length, eraseLast_toFun]
convert p.step ⟨p.length - 1, by omega⟩
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Fin.succ_mk]; omega
/--
Given two series of the form `a₀ -r→ ... -r→ X` and `X -r→ b ---> ...`,
then `a₀ -r→ ... -r→ X -r→ b ...` is another series obtained by combining the given two.
-/
@[simps length]
def smash (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : p.last = q.head) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + q.length
toFun := Fin.addCases (m := p.length) (n := q.length + 1) (p ∘ Fin.castSucc) q
step := by
apply Fin.addCases <;> intro i
· simp_rw [Fin.castSucc_castAdd, Fin.addCases_left, Fin.succ_castAdd]
convert p.step i
split_ifs with h
· rw [Fin.addCases_right, h, ← last, connect, head]
· apply Fin.addCases_left
simpa only [Fin.castSucc_natAdd, Fin.succ_natAdd, Fin.addCases_right] using q.step i
lemma smash_castLE {p q : RelSeries r} (h : p.last = q.head) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.smash q h (i.castLE (by simp)) = p i := by
| refine i.lastCases ?_ fun _ ↦ by dsimp only [smash]; apply Fin.addCases_left
show p.smash q h (Fin.natAdd p.length (0 : Fin (q.length + 1))) = _
simpa only [smash, Fin.addCases_right] using h.symm
lemma smash_castAdd {p q : RelSeries r} (h : p.last = q.head) (i : Fin p.length) :
p.smash q h (i.castAdd q.length).castSucc = p i.castSucc :=
smash_castLE h i.castSucc
lemma smash_succ_castAdd {p q : RelSeries r} (h : p.last = q.head)
| Mathlib/Order/RelSeries.lean | 543 | 551 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Instances
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Real
/-!
# The unit interval, as a topological space
Use `open unitInterval` to turn on the notation `I := Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) (1 : ℝ)`.
We provide basic instances, as well as a custom tactic for discharging
`0 ≤ ↑x`, `0 ≤ 1 - ↑x`, `↑x ≤ 1`, and `1 - ↑x ≤ 1` when `x : I`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Int Set.Icc
/-! ### The unit interval -/
/-- The unit interval `[0,1]` in ℝ. -/
abbrev unitInterval : Set ℝ :=
Set.Icc 0 1
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[unitInterval] notation "I" => unitInterval
namespace unitInterval
theorem zero_mem : (0 : ℝ) ∈ I :=
⟨le_rfl, zero_le_one⟩
theorem one_mem : (1 : ℝ) ∈ I :=
⟨zero_le_one, le_rfl⟩
theorem mul_mem {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ I) (hy : y ∈ I) : x * y ∈ I :=
⟨mul_nonneg hx.1 hy.1, mul_le_one₀ hx.2 hy.1 hy.2⟩
theorem div_mem {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hxy : x ≤ y) : x / y ∈ I :=
⟨div_nonneg hx hy, div_le_one_of_le₀ hxy hy⟩
theorem fract_mem (x : ℝ) : fract x ∈ I :=
⟨fract_nonneg _, (fract_lt_one _).le⟩
theorem mem_iff_one_sub_mem {t : ℝ} : t ∈ I ↔ 1 - t ∈ I := by
rw [mem_Icc, mem_Icc]
constructor <;> intro <;> constructor <;> linarith
instance hasZero : Zero I :=
⟨⟨0, zero_mem⟩⟩
instance hasOne : One I :=
⟨⟨1, by constructor <;> norm_num⟩⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass I := ⟨zero_le_one (α := ℝ)⟩
instance : CompleteLattice I := have : Fact ((0 : ℝ) ≤ 1) := ⟨zero_le_one⟩; inferInstance
lemma univ_eq_Icc : (univ : Set I) = Icc (0 : I) (1 : I) := Icc_bot_top.symm
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_ne_zero {x : I} : (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_ne_one {x : I} : (x : ℝ) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 := coe_eq_one.not
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_pos {x : I} : (0 : ℝ) < x ↔ 0 < x := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_lt_one {x : I} : (x : ℝ) < 1 ↔ x < 1 := Iff.rfl
instance : Nonempty I :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Mul I :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x * y, mul_mem x.2 y.2⟩⟩
theorem mul_le_left {x y : I} : x * y ≤ x :=
Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| mul_le_of_le_one_right x.2.1 y.2.2
theorem mul_le_right {x y : I} : x * y ≤ y :=
Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| mul_le_of_le_one_left y.2.1 x.2.2
/-- Unit interval central symmetry. -/
def symm : I → I := fun t => ⟨1 - t, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp t.prop⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "σ" => unitInterval.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_zero : σ 0 = 1 :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
@[simp]
theorem symm_one : σ 1 = 0 :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (x : I) : σ (σ x) = x :=
Subtype.ext <| by simp [symm]
theorem symm_involutive : Function.Involutive (symm : I → I) := symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : I → I) := symm_involutive.bijective
@[simp]
theorem coe_symm_eq (x : I) : (σ x : ℝ) = 1 - x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
symm (projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one x) = projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (1 - x) := by
ext
rcases le_total x 0 with h₀ | h₀
· simp [projIcc_of_le_left, projIcc_of_right_le, h₀]
· rcases le_total x 1 with h₁ | h₁
· lift x to I using ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
simp_rw [← coe_symm_eq, projIcc_val]
· simp [projIcc_of_le_left, projIcc_of_right_le, h₁]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous σ :=
Continuous.subtype_mk (by fun_prop) _
/-- `unitInterval.symm` as a `Homeomorph`. -/
@[simps]
def symmHomeomorph : I ≃ₜ I where
toFun := symm
invFun := symm
left_inv := symm_symm
right_inv := symm_symm
theorem strictAnti_symm : StrictAnti σ := fun _ _ h ↦ sub_lt_sub_left (α := ℝ) h _
@[simp]
theorem symm_inj {i j : I} : σ i = σ j ↔ i = j := symm_bijective.injective.eq_iff
theorem half_le_symm_iff (t : I) : 1 / 2 ≤ (σ t : ℝ) ↔ (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [coe_symm_eq, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_comm, ← le_sub_iff_add_le, sub_half]
@[simp]
lemma symm_eq_one {i : I} : σ i = 1 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← symm_zero, symm_inj]
@[simp]
lemma symm_eq_zero {i : I} : σ i = 0 ↔ i = 1 := by
rw [← symm_one, symm_inj]
@[simp]
theorem symm_le_symm {i j : I} : σ i ≤ σ j ↔ j ≤ i := by
simp only [symm, Subtype.mk_le_mk, sub_le_sub_iff, add_le_add_iff_left, Subtype.coe_le_coe]
theorem le_symm_comm {i j : I} : i ≤ σ j ↔ j ≤ σ i := by
rw [← symm_le_symm, symm_symm]
theorem symm_le_comm {i j : I} : σ i ≤ j ↔ σ j ≤ i := by
rw [← symm_le_symm, symm_symm]
@[simp]
theorem symm_lt_symm {i j : I} : σ i < σ j ↔ j < i := by
simp only [symm, Subtype.mk_lt_mk, sub_lt_sub_iff_left, Subtype.coe_lt_coe]
theorem lt_symm_comm {i j : I} : i < σ j ↔ j < σ i := by
rw [← symm_lt_symm, symm_symm]
theorem symm_lt_comm {i j : I} : σ i < j ↔ σ j < i := by
rw [← symm_lt_symm, symm_symm]
instance : ConnectedSpace I :=
Subtype.connectedSpace ⟨nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one, isPreconnected_Icc⟩
/-- Verify there is an instance for `CompactSpace I`. -/
example : CompactSpace I := by infer_instance
theorem nonneg (x : I) : 0 ≤ (x : ℝ) :=
x.2.1
theorem one_minus_nonneg (x : I) : 0 ≤ 1 - (x : ℝ) := by simpa using x.2.2
theorem le_one (x : I) : (x : ℝ) ≤ 1 :=
x.2.2
theorem one_minus_le_one (x : I) : 1 - (x : ℝ) ≤ 1 := by simpa using x.2.1
theorem add_pos {t : I} {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < (x + t : ℝ) :=
add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hx <| nonneg _
/-- like `unitInterval.nonneg`, but with the inequality in `I`. -/
theorem nonneg' {t : I} : 0 ≤ t :=
t.2.1
/-- like `unitInterval.le_one`, but with the inequality in `I`. -/
theorem le_one' {t : I} : t ≤ 1 :=
t.2.2
protected lemma pos_iff_ne_zero {x : I} : 0 < x ↔ x ≠ 0 := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected lemma lt_one_iff_ne_one {x : I} : x < 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 := lt_top_iff_ne_top
lemma eq_one_or_eq_zero_of_le_mul {i j : I} (h : i ≤ j * i) : i = 0 ∨ j = 1 := by
contrapose! h
rw [← unitInterval.lt_one_iff_ne_one, ← coe_lt_one, ← unitInterval.pos_iff_ne_zero,
← coe_pos] at h
rw [← Subtype.coe_lt_coe, coe_mul]
simpa using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h.right h.left
instance : Nontrivial I := ⟨⟨1, 0, (one_ne_zero <| congrArg Subtype.val ·)⟩⟩
theorem mul_pos_mem_iff {a t : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) : a * t ∈ I ↔ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) (1 / a) := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ <;> constructor
· exact nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right h₁ ha
· rwa [le_div_iff₀ ha, mul_comm]
· exact mul_nonneg ha.le h₁
· rwa [le_div_iff₀ ha, mul_comm] at h₂
theorem two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff {t : ℝ} : 2 * t - 1 ∈ I ↔ t ∈ Set.Icc (1 / 2 : ℝ) 1 := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ <;> constructor <;> linarith
/-- The unit interval as a submonoid of ℝ. -/
def submonoid : Submonoid ℝ where
carrier := unitInterval
one_mem' := unitInterval.one_mem
mul_mem' := unitInterval.mul_mem
@[simp] theorem coe_unitIntervalSubmonoid : submonoid = unitInterval := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_unitIntervalSubmonoid {x} : x ∈ submonoid ↔ x ∈ unitInterval :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem prod_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ unitInterval) :
| ∏ c ∈ t, f c ∈ unitInterval := _root_.prod_mem (S := unitInterval.submonoid) h
instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero I where
zero_mul i := zero_mul i
mul_zero i := mul_zero i
zero_le_one := nonneg'
| Mathlib/Topology/UnitInterval.lean | 232 | 237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro,
Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Lattice structure of lists
This files prove basic properties about `List.disjoint`, `List.union`, `List.inter` and
`List.bagInter`, which are defined in core Lean and `Data.List.Defs`.
`l₁ ∪ l₂` is the list where all elements of `l₁` have been inserted in `l₂` in order. For example,
`[0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 3] ∪ [4, 3, 3, 0] = [1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 0]`
`l₁ ∩ l₂` is the list of elements of `l₁` in order which are in `l₂`. For example,
`[0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 3] ∪ [4, 3, 3, 0] = [0, 0, 3]`
`List.bagInter l₁ l₂` is the list of elements that are in both `l₁` and `l₂`,
counted with multiplicity and in the order they appear in `l₁`.
As opposed to `List.inter`, `List.bagInter` copes well with multiplicity. For example,
`bagInter [0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0] [1, 0, 1, 4, 3] = [0, 1, 3, 1]`
-/
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {p : α → Prop} {a : α}
/-! ### `Disjoint` -/
section Disjoint
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
end Disjoint
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-! ### `union` -/
section Union
theorem mem_union_left (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : List α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union_iff.2 (Or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union_iff.2 (Or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [], _ => ⟨[], by rfl, rfl⟩
| a :: l₁, l₂ =>
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ then
⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by
simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else
⟨a :: t, s.cons_cons _, by
simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h]⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp fun _ => And.right
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨_, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union : (∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x := by
simp only [mem_union_iff, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
theorem Subset.union_eq_right {xs ys : List α} (h : xs ⊆ ys) : xs ∪ ys = ys := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
rw [cons_union, insert_of_mem <| mem_union_right _ <| h mem_cons_self,
ih <| subset_of_cons_subset h]
end Union
/-! ### `inter` -/
section Inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_nil (l : List α) : [] ∩ l = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inter_cons_of_mem (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∈ l₂) : (a :: l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: l₁ ∩ l₂ := by
simp [Inter.inter, List.inter, h]
@[simp]
theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₂) : (a :: l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ := by
simp [Inter.inter, List.inter, h]
@[simp]
theorem inter_nil' (l : List α) : l ∩ [] = [] := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih => by_cases x ∈ xs <;> simp [ih]
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right (h : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂) : a ∈ l₂ := by simpa using of_mem_filter h
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : a ∈ l₁) (h₂ : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem h₁ <| by simpa using h₂
theorem inter_subset_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset' _
theorem inter_subset_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ := fun _ => mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ := fun _ h =>
mem_inter_iff.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter_iff, not_and]
rfl
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.inter_eq_nil⟩ := inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) (l₂ : List α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
BAll.imp_left (fun _ => mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right (l₁ : List α) (h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
BAll.imp_left (fun _ => mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
@[simp]
| theorem inter_reverse {xs ys : List α} : xs.inter ys.reverse = xs.inter ys := by
| Mathlib/Data/List/Lattice.lean | 147 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.AddCircle
/-!
# The additive circle as a normed group
We define the normed group structure on `AddCircle p`, for `p : ℝ`. For example if `p = 1` then:
`‖(x : AddCircle 1)‖ = |x - round x|` for any `x : ℝ` (see `UnitAddCircle.norm_eq`).
## Main definitions:
* `AddCircle.norm_eq`: a characterisation of the norm on `AddCircle p`
## TODO
* The fact `InnerProductGeometry.angle (Real.cos θ) (Real.sin θ) = ‖(θ : Real.Angle)‖`
-/
noncomputable section
open Metric QuotientAddGroup Set
open Int hiding mem_zmultiples_iff
open AddSubgroup
namespace AddCircle
variable (p : ℝ)
instance : NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle p) := QuotientAddGroup.instNormedAddCommGroup _
@[simp]
theorem norm_coe_mul (x : ℝ) (t : ℝ) :
‖(↑(t * x) : AddCircle (t * p))‖ = |t| * ‖(x : AddCircle p)‖ := by
| obtain rfl | ht := eq_or_ne t 0
· simp
simp only [norm_eq_infDist, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← infDist_smul₀ ht, smul_zero]
congr with m
simp only [zmultiples, eq_iff_sub_mem, zsmul_eq_mul, mem_mk, mem_setOf_eq,
mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ ht, smul_eq_mul]
simp_rw [mul_left_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, Set.range_smul, mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ ht]
simp [mul_sub, ht, -mem_range]
theorem norm_neg_period (x : ℝ) : ‖(x : AddCircle (-p))‖ = ‖(x : AddCircle p)‖ := by
suffices ‖(↑(-1 * x) : AddCircle (-1 * p))‖ = ‖(x : AddCircle p)‖ by
rw [← this, neg_one_mul]
simp
simp only [norm_coe_mul, abs_neg, abs_one, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_of_zero {x : ℝ} : ‖(x : AddCircle (0 : ℝ))‖ = |x| := by
suffices { y : ℝ | (y : AddCircle (0 : ℝ)) = (x : AddCircle (0 : ℝ)) } = {x} by
simp [norm_eq_infDist, this]
ext y
simp [eq_iff_sub_mem, mem_zmultiples_iff, sub_eq_zero]
theorem norm_eq {x : ℝ} : ‖(x : AddCircle p)‖ = |x - round (p⁻¹ * x) * p| := by
suffices ∀ x : ℝ, ‖(x : AddCircle (1 : ℝ))‖ = |x - round x| by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/AddCircle.lean | 44 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
/-!
# Opposite categories
We provide a category instance on `Cᵒᵖ`.
The morphisms `X ⟶ Y` are defined to be the morphisms `unop Y ⟶ unop X` in `C`.
Here `Cᵒᵖ` is an irreducible typeclass synonym for `C`
(it is the same one used in the algebra library).
We also provide various mechanisms for constructing opposite morphisms, functors,
and natural transformations.
Unfortunately, because we do not have a definitional equality `op (op X) = X`,
there are quite a few variations that are needed in practice.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
open Opposite
variable {C : Type u₁}
section Quiver
variable [Quiver.{v₁} C]
theorem Quiver.Hom.op_inj {X Y : C} :
Function.Injective (Quiver.Hom.op : (X ⟶ Y) → (Opposite.op Y ⟶ Opposite.op X)) := fun _ _ H =>
congr_arg Quiver.Hom.unop H
theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_inj {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} :
Function.Injective (Quiver.Hom.unop : (X ⟶ Y) → (Opposite.unop Y ⟶ Opposite.unop X)) :=
fun _ _ H => congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op H
@[simp]
theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f.op.unop = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_op' {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} {x} :
@Quiver.Hom.unop C _ X Y no_index (Opposite.op (unop := x)) = x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quiver.Hom.op_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f.unop.op = f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem Quiver.Hom.unop_mk {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Quiver.Hom.unop {unop := f} = f := rfl
end Quiver
namespace CategoryTheory
variable [Category.{v₁} C]
/-- The opposite category. -/
@[stacks 001M]
instance Category.opposite : Category.{v₁} Cᵒᵖ where
comp f g := (g.unop ≫ f.unop).op
id X := (𝟙 (unop X)).op
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem op_comp {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g).op = g.op ≫ f.op :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_id {X : C} : (𝟙 X).op = 𝟙 (op X) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem unop_comp {X Y Z : Cᵒᵖ} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g).unop = g.unop ≫ f.unop :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_id {X : Cᵒᵖ} : (𝟙 X).unop = 𝟙 (unop X) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_id_op {X : C} : (𝟙 (op X)).unop = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_id_unop {X : Cᵒᵖ} : (𝟙 (unop X)).op = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
section
variable (C)
/-- The functor from the double-opposite of a category to the underlying category. -/
@[simps]
def unopUnop : Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ ⥤ C where
obj X := unop (unop X)
map f := f.unop.unop
/-- The functor from a category to its double-opposite. -/
@[simps]
def opOp : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ where
obj X := op (op X)
map f := f.op.op
/-- The double opposite category is equivalent to the original. -/
@[simps]
def opOpEquivalence : Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ ≌ C where
functor := unopUnop C
inverse := opOp C
unitIso := Iso.refl (𝟭 Cᵒᵖᵒᵖ)
counitIso := Iso.refl (opOp C ⋙ unopUnop C)
instance : (opOp C).IsEquivalence :=
(opOpEquivalence C).isEquivalence_inverse
instance : (unopUnop C).IsEquivalence :=
(opOpEquivalence C).isEquivalence_functor
end
/-- If `f` is an isomorphism, so is `f.op` -/
instance isIso_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.op :=
⟨⟨(inv f).op, ⟨Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp), Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)⟩⟩⟩
/-- If `f.op` is an isomorphism `f` must be too.
(This cannot be an instance as it would immediately loop!)
-/
theorem isIso_of_op {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f.op] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨(inv f.op).unop, ⟨Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp), Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)⟩⟩⟩
theorem isIso_op_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : IsIso f.op ↔ IsIso f :=
⟨fun _ => isIso_of_op _, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
theorem isIso_unop_iff {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) : IsIso f.unop ↔ IsIso f := by
rw [← isIso_op_iff f.unop, Quiver.Hom.op_unop]
instance isIso_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsIso f.unop :=
(isIso_unop_iff _).2 inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem op_inv {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : (inv f).op = inv f.op := by
apply IsIso.eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id
rw [← op_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, op_id]
@[simp]
theorem unop_inv {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : (inv f).unop = inv f.unop := by
apply IsIso.eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id
rw [← unop_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, unop_id]
namespace Functor
section
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- The opposite of a functor, i.e. considering a functor `F : C ⥤ D` as a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made between these. -/
@[simps]
protected def op (F : C ⥤ D) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ where
obj X := op (F.obj (unop X))
map f := (F.map f.unop).op
/-- Given a functor `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ` we can take the "unopposite" functor `F : C ⥤ D`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made between these.
-/
@[simps]
protected def unop (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : C ⥤ D where
obj X := unop (F.obj (op X))
map f := (F.map f.op).unop
/-- The isomorphism between `F.op.unop` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def opUnopIso (F : C ⥤ D) : F.op.unop ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
/-- The isomorphism between `F.unop.op` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def unopOpIso (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : F.unop.op ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
variable (C D)
/-- Taking the opposite of a functor is functorial.
-/
@[simps]
def opHom : (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ where
obj F := (unop F).op
map α :=
{ app := fun X => (α.unop.app (unop X)).op
naturality := fun _ _ f => Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (α.unop.naturality f.unop).symm }
/-- Take the "unopposite" of a functor is functorial.
-/
@[simps]
def opInv : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) ⥤ (C ⥤ D)ᵒᵖ where
obj F := op F.unop
map α :=
Quiver.Hom.op
{ app := fun X => (α.app (op X)).unop
naturality := fun _ _ f => Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| (α.naturality f.op).symm }
variable {C D}
/--
Another variant of the opposite of functor, turning a functor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ` into a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made.
-/
@[simps]
protected def leftOp (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj X := unop (F.obj (unop X))
map f := (F.map f.unop).unop
/--
Another variant of the opposite of functor, turning a functor `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D` into a functor `C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`.
In informal mathematics no distinction is made.
-/
@[simps]
protected def rightOp (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ where
obj X := op (F.obj (op X))
map f := (F.map f.op).op
lemma rightOp_map_unop {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F.rightOp.map f).unop = F.map f.op := rfl
instance {F : C ⥤ D} [Full F] : Full F.op where
map_surjective f := ⟨(F.preimage f.unop).op, by simp⟩
instance {F : C ⥤ D} [Faithful F] : Faithful F.op where
map_injective h := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by simpa using map_injective F (Quiver.Hom.op_inj h)
/-- If F is faithful then the right_op of F is also faithful. -/
instance rightOp_faithful {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} [Faithful F] : Faithful F.rightOp where
map_injective h := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (map_injective F (Quiver.Hom.op_inj h))
/-- If F is faithful then the left_op of F is also faithful. -/
instance leftOp_faithful {F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} [Faithful F] : Faithful F.leftOp where
map_injective h := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (map_injective F (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h))
instance rightOp_full {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} [Full F] : Full F.rightOp where
map_surjective f := ⟨(F.preimage f.unop).unop, by simp⟩
instance leftOp_full {F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} [Full F] : Full F.leftOp where
map_surjective f := ⟨(F.preimage f.op).op, by simp⟩
/-- The isomorphism between `F.leftOp.rightOp` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def leftOpRightOpIso (F : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : F.leftOp.rightOp ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
/-- The isomorphism between `F.rightOp.leftOp` and `F`. -/
@[simps!]
def rightOpLeftOpIso (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : F.rightOp.leftOp ≅ F :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
/-- Whenever possible, it is advisable to use the isomorphism `rightOpLeftOpIso`
instead of this equality of functors. -/
theorem rightOp_leftOp_eq (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : F.rightOp.leftOp = F := by
cases F
rfl
end
end Functor
namespace NatTrans
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
section
variable {F G : C ⥤ D}
/-- The opposite of a natural transformation. -/
@[simps]
protected def op (α : F ⟶ G) : G.op ⟶ F.op where
app X := (α.app (unop X)).op
naturality X Y f := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem op_id (F : C ⥤ D) : NatTrans.op (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 F.op :=
rfl
/-- The "unopposite" of a natural transformation. -/
@[simps]
protected def unop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F ⟶ G) : G.unop ⟶ F.unop where
app X := (α.app (op X)).unop
naturality X Y f := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem unop_id (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : NatTrans.unop (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 F.unop :=
rfl
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F.op ⟶ G.op`,
we can take the "unopposite" of each component obtaining a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`.
-/
@[simps]
protected def removeOp (α : F.op ⟶ G.op) : G ⟶ F where
app X := (α.app (op X)).unop
naturality X Y f :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by simpa only [Functor.op_map] using (α.naturality f.op).symm
@[simp]
theorem removeOp_id (F : C ⥤ D) : NatTrans.removeOp (𝟙 F.op) = 𝟙 F :=
rfl
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F.unop ⟶ G.unop`, we can take the opposite of each
component obtaining a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`. -/
@[simps]
protected def removeUnop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F.unop ⟶ G.unop) : G ⟶ F where
app X := (α.app (unop X)).op
naturality X Y f :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by simpa only [Functor.unop_map] using (α.naturality f.unop).symm
@[simp]
theorem removeUnop_id (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ) : NatTrans.removeUnop (𝟙 F.unop) = 𝟙 F :=
rfl
end
section
variable {F G H : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ}
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F ⟶ G`, for `F G : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`,
taking `unop` of each component gives a natural transformation `G.leftOp ⟶ F.leftOp`.
-/
@[simps]
protected def leftOp (α : F ⟶ G) : G.leftOp ⟶ F.leftOp where
app X := (α.app (unop X)).unop
naturality X Y f := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem leftOp_id : NatTrans.leftOp (𝟙 F : F ⟶ F) = 𝟙 F.leftOp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leftOp_comp (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) : NatTrans.leftOp (α ≫ β) =
NatTrans.leftOp β ≫ NatTrans.leftOp α :=
rfl
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F.leftOp ⟶ G.leftOp`, for `F G : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ`,
taking `op` of each component gives a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`.
-/
@[simps]
protected def removeLeftOp (α : F.leftOp ⟶ G.leftOp) : G ⟶ F where
app X := (α.app (op X)).op
naturality X Y f :=
Quiver.Hom.unop_inj <| by simpa only [Functor.leftOp_map] using (α.naturality f.op).symm
@[simp]
theorem removeLeftOp_id : NatTrans.removeLeftOp (𝟙 F.leftOp) = 𝟙 F :=
rfl
end
section
variable {F G H : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D}
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F ⟶ G`, for `F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`,
taking `op` of each component gives a natural transformation `G.rightOp ⟶ F.rightOp`.
-/
@[simps]
protected def rightOp (α : F ⟶ G) : G.rightOp ⟶ F.rightOp where
app _ := (α.app _).op
naturality X Y f := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem rightOp_id : NatTrans.rightOp (𝟙 F : F ⟶ F) = 𝟙 F.rightOp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightOp_comp (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) : NatTrans.rightOp (α ≫ β) =
NatTrans.rightOp β ≫ NatTrans.rightOp α :=
rfl
/-- Given a natural transformation `α : F.rightOp ⟶ G.rightOp`, for `F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D`,
taking `unop` of each component gives a natural transformation `G ⟶ F`.
-/
@[simps]
protected def removeRightOp (α : F.rightOp ⟶ G.rightOp) : G ⟶ F where
app X := (α.app X.unop).unop
naturality X Y f :=
Quiver.Hom.op_inj <| by simpa only [Functor.rightOp_map] using (α.naturality f.unop).symm
@[simp]
theorem removeRightOp_id : NatTrans.removeRightOp (𝟙 F.rightOp) = 𝟙 F :=
rfl
end
end NatTrans
namespace Iso
variable {X Y : C}
/-- The opposite isomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
protected def op (α : X ≅ Y) : op Y ≅ op X where
hom := α.hom.op
inv := α.inv.op
hom_inv_id := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj α.inv_hom_id
inv_hom_id := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj α.hom_inv_id
/-- The isomorphism obtained from an isomorphism in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ≅ Y) : Y.unop ≅ X.unop where
hom := f.hom.unop
inv := f.inv.unop
hom_inv_id := by simp only [← unop_comp, f.inv_hom_id, unop_id]
inv_hom_id := by simp only [← unop_comp, f.hom_inv_id, unop_id]
@[simp]
theorem unop_op {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ≅ Y) : f.unop.op = f := by (ext; rfl)
@[simp]
theorem op_unop {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) : f.op.unop = f := by (ext; rfl)
section
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] {F G : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (e : F ≅ G) (X : C)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma unop_hom_inv_id_app : (e.hom.app X).unop ≫ (e.inv.app X).unop = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← unop_comp, inv_hom_id_app, unop_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma unop_inv_hom_id_app : (e.inv.app X).unop ≫ (e.hom.app X).unop = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← unop_comp, hom_inv_id_app, unop_id]
end
end Iso
namespace NatIso
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
variable {F G : C ⥤ D}
/-- The natural isomorphism between opposite functors `G.op ≅ F.op` induced by a natural
isomorphism between the original functors `F ≅ G`. -/
@[simps]
protected def op (α : F ≅ G) : G.op ≅ F.op where
hom := NatTrans.op α.hom
inv := NatTrans.op α.inv
hom_inv_id := by ext; dsimp; rw [← op_comp]; rw [α.inv_hom_id_app]; rfl
inv_hom_id := by ext; dsimp; rw [← op_comp]; rw [α.hom_inv_id_app]; rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism between functors `G ≅ F` induced by a natural isomorphism
between the opposite functors `F.op ≅ G.op`. -/
@[simps]
protected def removeOp (α : F.op ≅ G.op) : G ≅ F where
hom := NatTrans.removeOp α.hom
inv := NatTrans.removeOp α.inv
/-- The natural isomorphism between functors `G.unop ≅ F.unop` induced by a natural isomorphism
between the original functors `F ≅ G`. -/
@[simps]
protected def unop {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (α : F ≅ G) : G.unop ≅ F.unop where
hom := NatTrans.unop α.hom
inv := NatTrans.unop α.inv
end NatIso
namespace Equivalence
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- An equivalence between categories gives an equivalence between the opposite categories.
-/
@[simps]
def op (e : C ≌ D) : Cᵒᵖ ≌ Dᵒᵖ where
functor := e.functor.op
inverse := e.inverse.op
unitIso := (NatIso.op e.unitIso).symm
counitIso := (NatIso.op e.counitIso).symm
| functor_unitIso_comp X := by
apply Quiver.Hom.unop_inj
dsimp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Opposites.lean | 484 | 486 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
| theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 388 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`MonoidHom` (resp., `AddMonoidHom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
This file also defines the lesser-used (and notation-less) homomorphism types which are used as
building blocks for other homomorphisms:
* `ZeroHom`
* `OneHom`
* `AddHom`
* `MulHom`
## Notations
* `→+`: Bundled `AddMonoid` homs. Also use for `AddGroup` homs.
* `→*`: Bundled `Monoid` homs. Also use for `Group` homs.
* `→ₙ+`: Bundled `AddSemigroup` homs.
* `→ₙ*`: Bundled `Semigroup` homs.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `GroupHom` -- the idea is that `MonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `MonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `MonoidHom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `MonoidHom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `Deprecated/Group`.
## Tags
MonoidHom, AddMonoidHom
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β M N P : Type*}
-- monoids
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
-- groups
variable {F : Type*}
-- homs
section Zero
/-- `ZeroHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve zero.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ZeroHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [ZeroHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `ZeroHomClass`.
-/
structure ZeroHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
protected map_zero' : toFun 0 = 0
/-- `ZeroHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of zero-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `ZeroHom`.
-/
class ZeroHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] [FunLike F M N] :
Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
map_zero : ∀ f : F, f 0 = 0
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Zero
section Add
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve addition. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `AddHom` is a non-unital additive monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : AddHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddHomClass`.
-/
structure AddHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Add M] [Add N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
protected map_add' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` denotes the type of addition-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ+ " => AddHom
/-- `AddHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `AddHom`.
-/
class AddHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Add M] [Add N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
map_add : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Add
section add_zero
/-- `M →+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `AddZeroClass` structure.
`AddMonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →+ N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddMonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddMonoidHomClass`.
-/
structure AddMonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] extends
ZeroHom M N, AddHom M N
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `M →+ N` denotes the type of additive monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →+ " => AddMonoidHom
/-- `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `AddZeroClass`-preserving
homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `AddMonoidHom`.
-/
class AddMonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*)
[AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M N, ZeroHomClass F M N
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end add_zero
section One
variable [One M] [One N]
/-- `OneHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve one.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : OneHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `OneHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure OneHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [One M] [One N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
protected map_one' : toFun 1 = 1
/-- `OneHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of one-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `OneHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class OneHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [One M] [One N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
map_one : ∀ f : F, f 1 = 1
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.funLike : FunLike (OneHom M N) M N where
coe := OneHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.oneHomClass : OneHomClass (OneHom M N) M N where
map_one := OneHom.map_one'
library_note "low priority simp lemmas"
/--
The hom class hierarchy allows for a single lemma, such as `map_one`, to apply to a large variety
of morphism types, so long as they have an instance of `OneHomClass`. For example, this applies to
to `MonoidHom`, `RingHom`, `AlgHom`, `StarAlgHom`, as well as their `Equiv` variants, etc. However,
precisely because these lemmas are so widely applicable, they keys in the `simp` discrimination tree
are necessarily highly non-specific. For example, the key for `map_one` is
`@DFunLike.coe _ _ _ _ _ 1`.
Consequently, whenever lean sees `⇑f 1`, for some `f : F`, it will attempt to synthesize a
`OneHomClass F ?A ?B` instance. If no such instance exists, then Lean will need to traverse (almost)
the entirety of the `FunLike` hierarchy in order to determine this because so many classes have a
`OneHomClass` instance (in fact, this problem is likely worse for `ZeroHomClass`). This can lead to
a significant performance hit when `map_one` fails to apply.
To avoid this problem, we mark these widely applicable simp lemmas with key discimination tree keys
with `low` priority in order to ensure that they are not tried first.
| -/
variable [FunLike F M N]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/Defs.lean | 213 | 215 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
/-!
# Basic theory of bornology
We develop the basic theory of bornologies. Instead of axiomatizing bounded sets and defining
bornologies in terms of those, we recognize that the cobounded sets form a filter and define a
bornology as a filter of cobounded sets which contains the cofinite filter. This allows us to make
use of the extensive library for filters, but we also provide the relevant connecting results for
bounded sets.
The specification of a bornology in terms of the cobounded filter is equivalent to the standard
one (e.g., see [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987], **covering bornology**, now
often called simply **bornology**) in terms of bounded sets (see `Bornology.ofBounded`,
`IsBounded.union`, `IsBounded.subset`), except that we do not allow the empty bornology (that is,
we require that *some* set must be bounded; equivalently, `∅` is bounded). In the literature the
cobounded filter is generally referred to as the *filter at infinity*.
## Main definitions
- `Bornology α`: a class consisting of `cobounded : Filter α` and a proof that this filter
contains the `cofinite` filter.
- `Bornology.IsCobounded`: the predicate that a set is a member of the `cobounded α` filter. For
`s : Set α`, one should prefer `Bornology.IsCobounded s` over `s ∈ cobounded α`.
- `bornology.IsBounded`: the predicate that states a set is bounded (i.e., the complement of a
cobounded set). One should prefer `Bornology.IsBounded s` over `sᶜ ∈ cobounded α`.
- `BoundedSpace α`: a class extending `Bornology α` with the condition
`Bornology.IsBounded (Set.univ : Set α)`
Although use of `cobounded α` is discouraged for indicating the (co)boundedness of individual sets,
it is intended for regular use as a filter on `α`.
-/
open Set Filter
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-- A **bornology** on a type `α` is a filter of cobounded sets which contains the cofinite filter.
Such spaces are equivalently specified by their bounded sets, see `Bornology.ofBounded`
and `Bornology.ext_iff_isBounded` -/
class Bornology (α : Type*) where
/-- The filter of cobounded sets in a bornology. This is a field of the structure, but one
should always prefer `Bornology.cobounded` because it makes the `α` argument explicit. -/
cobounded' : Filter α
/-- The cobounded filter in a bornology is smaller than the cofinite filter. This is a field of
the structure, but one should always prefer `Bornology.le_cofinite` because it makes the `α`
argument explicit. -/
le_cofinite' : cobounded' ≤ cofinite
/- porting note: Because Lean 4 doesn't accept the `[]` syntax to make arguments of structure
fields explicit, we have to define these separately, prove the `ext` lemmas manually, and
initialize new `simps` projections. -/
/-- The filter of cobounded sets in a bornology. -/
def Bornology.cobounded (α : Type*) [Bornology α] : Filter α := Bornology.cobounded'
alias Bornology.Simps.cobounded := Bornology.cobounded
lemma Bornology.le_cofinite (α : Type*) [Bornology α] : cobounded α ≤ cofinite :=
Bornology.le_cofinite'
initialize_simps_projections Bornology (cobounded' → cobounded)
@[ext]
lemma Bornology.ext (t t' : Bornology α)
(h_cobounded : @Bornology.cobounded α t = @Bornology.cobounded α t') :
t = t' := by
cases t
cases t'
congr
/-- A constructor for bornologies by specifying the bounded sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
@[simps]
def Bornology.ofBounded {α : Type*} (B : Set (Set α))
(empty_mem : ∅ ∈ B)
(subset_mem : ∀ s₁ ∈ B, ∀ s₂ ⊆ s₁, s₂ ∈ B)
(union_mem : ∀ s₁ ∈ B, ∀ s₂ ∈ B, s₁ ∪ s₂ ∈ B)
(singleton_mem : ∀ x, {x} ∈ B) : Bornology α where
cobounded' := comk (· ∈ B) empty_mem subset_mem union_mem
le_cofinite' := by simpa [le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem]
/-- A constructor for bornologies by specifying the bounded sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
@[simps! cobounded]
def Bornology.ofBounded' {α : Type*} (B : Set (Set α))
(empty_mem : ∅ ∈ B)
(subset_mem : ∀ s₁ ∈ B, ∀ s₂ ⊆ s₁, s₂ ∈ B)
(union_mem : ∀ s₁ ∈ B, ∀ s₂ ∈ B, s₁ ∪ s₂ ∈ B)
(sUnion_univ : ⋃₀ B = univ) :
Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded B empty_mem subset_mem union_mem fun x => by
rw [sUnion_eq_univ_iff] at sUnion_univ
rcases sUnion_univ x with ⟨s, hs, hxs⟩
exact subset_mem s hs {x} (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hxs)
namespace Bornology
section
/-- `IsCobounded` is the predicate that `s` is in the filter of cobounded sets in the ambient
bornology on `α` -/
def IsCobounded [Bornology α] (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s ∈ cobounded α
/-- `IsBounded` is the predicate that `s` is bounded relative to the ambient bornology on `α`. -/
def IsBounded [Bornology α] (s : Set α) : Prop :=
IsCobounded sᶜ
variable {_ : Bornology α} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
theorem isCobounded_def {s : Set α} : IsCobounded s ↔ s ∈ cobounded α :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isBounded_def {s : Set α} : IsBounded s ↔ sᶜ ∈ cobounded α :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_compl_iff : IsBounded sᶜ ↔ IsCobounded s := by
rw [isBounded_def, isCobounded_def, compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem isCobounded_compl_iff : IsCobounded sᶜ ↔ IsBounded s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨IsBounded.of_compl, IsCobounded.compl⟩ := isBounded_compl_iff
alias ⟨IsCobounded.of_compl, IsBounded.compl⟩ := isCobounded_compl_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_empty : IsBounded (∅ : Set α) := by
rw [isBounded_def, compl_empty]
exact univ_mem
theorem nonempty_of_not_isBounded (h : ¬IsBounded s) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
rintro rfl
exact h isBounded_empty
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_singleton : IsBounded ({x} : Set α) := by
rw [isBounded_def]
exact le_cofinite _ (finite_singleton x).compl_mem_cofinite
theorem isBounded_iff_forall_mem : IsBounded s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h _ _ ↦ h, fun h ↦ by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
exacts [isBounded_empty, h x hx]⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCobounded_univ : IsCobounded (univ : Set α) :=
univ_mem
@[simp]
theorem isCobounded_inter : IsCobounded (s ∩ t) ↔ IsCobounded s ∧ IsCobounded t :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem IsCobounded.inter (hs : IsCobounded s) (ht : IsCobounded t) : IsCobounded (s ∩ t) :=
isCobounded_inter.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_union : IsBounded (s ∪ t) ↔ IsBounded s ∧ IsBounded t := by
simp only [← isCobounded_compl_iff, compl_union, isCobounded_inter]
theorem IsBounded.union (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s ∪ t) :=
isBounded_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem IsCobounded.superset (hs : IsCobounded s) (ht : s ⊆ t) : IsCobounded t :=
mem_of_superset hs ht
theorem IsBounded.subset (ht : IsBounded t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : IsBounded s :=
ht.superset (compl_subset_compl.mpr hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_bounded_univ : ⋃₀ { s : Set α | IsBounded s } = univ :=
sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun a => ⟨{a}, isBounded_singleton, mem_singleton a⟩
theorem IsBounded.insert (h : IsBounded s) (x : α) : IsBounded (insert x s) :=
isBounded_singleton.union h
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_insert : IsBounded (insert x s) ↔ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.subset (subset_insert _ _), (.insert · x)⟩
theorem comap_cobounded_le_iff [Bornology β] {f : α → β} :
(cobounded β).comap f ≤ cobounded α ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, IsBounded s → IsBounded (f '' s) := by
refine
⟨fun h s hs => ?_, fun h t ht =>
⟨(f '' tᶜ)ᶜ, h <| IsCobounded.compl ht, compl_subset_comm.1 <| subset_preimage_image _ _⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := h hs.compl
rw [subset_compl_comm, ← preimage_compl] at hts
exact (IsCobounded.compl ht).subset ((image_subset f hts).trans <| image_preimage_subset _ _)
end
theorem ext_iff' {t t' : Bornology α} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ @cobounded α t ↔ s ∈ @cobounded α t' :=
Bornology.ext_iff.trans Filter.ext_iff
theorem ext_iff_isBounded {t t' : Bornology α} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, @IsBounded α t s ↔ @IsBounded α t' s :=
ext_iff'.trans compl_surjective.forall
variable {s : Set α}
theorem isCobounded_ofBounded_iff (B : Set (Set α)) {empty_mem subset_mem union_mem sUnion_univ} :
@IsCobounded _ (ofBounded B empty_mem subset_mem union_mem sUnion_univ) s ↔ sᶜ ∈ B :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isBounded_ofBounded_iff (B : Set (Set α)) {empty_mem subset_mem union_mem sUnion_univ} :
@IsBounded _ (ofBounded B empty_mem subset_mem union_mem sUnion_univ) s ↔ s ∈ B := by
rw [isBounded_def, ofBounded_cobounded, compl_mem_comk]
variable [Bornology α]
theorem isCobounded_biInter {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
IsCobounded (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IsCobounded (f i) :=
biInter_mem hs
@[simp]
| theorem isCobounded_biInter_finset (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set α} :
IsCobounded (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IsCobounded (f i) :=
biInter_finset_mem s
@[simp]
theorem isCobounded_iInter [Finite ι] {f : ι → Set α} :
IsCobounded (⋂ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, IsCobounded (f i) :=
iInter_mem
| Mathlib/Topology/Bornology/Basic.lean | 226 | 233 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.MonoidWithZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.Ring
/-!
# Localizations of commutative rings
This file contains various basic results on localizations.
We characterize the localization of a commutative ring `R` at a submonoid `M` up to
isomorphism; that is, a commutative ring `S` is the localization of `R` at `M` iff we can find a
ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` satisfying 3 properties:
1. For all `y ∈ M`, `f y` is a unit;
2. For all `z : S`, there exists `(x, y) : R × M` such that `z * f y = f x`;
3. For all `x, y : R` such that `f x = f y`, there exists `c ∈ M` such that `x * c = y * c`.
(The converse is a consequence of 1.)
In the following, let `R, P` be commutative rings, `S, Q` be `R`- and `P`-algebras
and `M, T` be submonoids of `R` and `P` respectively, e.g.:
```
variable (R S P Q : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing P] [CommRing Q]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra P Q] (M : Submonoid R) (T : Submonoid P)
```
## Main definitions
* `IsLocalization.algEquiv`: if `Q` is another localization of `R` at `M`, then `S` and `Q`
are isomorphic as `R`-algebras
## Implementation notes
In maths it is natural to reason up to isomorphism, but in Lean we cannot naturally `rewrite` one
structure with an isomorphic one; one way around this is to isolate a predicate characterizing
a structure up to isomorphism, and reason about things that satisfy the predicate.
A previous version of this file used a fully bundled type of ring localization maps,
then used a type synonym `f.codomain` for `f : LocalizationMap M S` to instantiate the
`R`-algebra structure on `S`. This results in defining ad-hoc copies for everything already
defined on `S`. By making `IsLocalization` a predicate on the `algebraMap R S`,
we can ensure the localization map commutes nicely with other `algebraMap`s.
To prove most lemmas about a localization map `algebraMap R S` in this file we invoke the
corresponding proof for the underlying `CommMonoid` localization map
`IsLocalization.toLocalizationMap M S`, which can be found in `GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization`
and the namespace `Submonoid.LocalizationMap`.
To reason about the localization as a quotient type, use `mk_eq_of_mk'` and associated lemmas.
These show the quotient map `mk : R → M → Localization M` equals the surjection
`LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by the map `algebraMap : R →+* Localization M`.
The lemma `mk_eq_of_mk'` hence gives you access to the results in the rest of the file,
which are about the `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by any localization map.
The proof that "a `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R \ {0}`
is a field" is a `def` rather than an `instance`, so if you want to reason about a field of
fractions `K`, assume `[Field K]` instead of just `[CommRing K]`.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Function
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
variable {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CommSemiring (R i)]
variable {i : ι} (S : Submonoid (R i))
/-- `IsLocalization.map` applied to a projection homomorphism from a product ring. -/
noncomputable abbrev mapPiEvalRingHom :
Localization (S.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i) →+* Localization S :=
map (T := S) _ (Pi.evalRingHom R i) le_rfl
open Function in
theorem mapPiEvalRingHom_bijective : Bijective (mapPiEvalRingHom S) := by
let T := S.comap (Pi.evalRingHom R i)
classical
refine ⟨fun x₁ x₂ eq ↦ ?_, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨r₁, s₁, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective T x₁
obtain ⟨r₂, s₂, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective T x₂
simp_rw [map_mk'] at eq
rw [IsLocalization.eq] at eq ⊢
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := eq
refine ⟨⟨update 0 i s, by apply update_self i s.1 0 ▸ s.2⟩, funext fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa using hs
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
· obtain ⟨r, s, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective S x
exact ⟨mk' (M := T) _ (update 0 i r) ⟨update 0 i s, by apply update_self i s.1 0 ▸ s.2⟩,
by simp [map_mk']⟩
end Localization
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {M N : Submonoid R} {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommSemiring P]
namespace IsLocalization
section IsLocalization
variable [IsLocalization M S]
variable (M S) in
include M in
theorem linearMap_compatibleSMul (N₁ N₂) [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [Module R N₁]
[Module S N₁] [Module R N₂] [Module S N₂] [IsScalarTower R S N₁] [IsScalarTower R S N₂] :
LinearMap.CompatibleSMul N₁ N₂ S R where
map_smul f s s' := by
obtain ⟨r, m, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M s
rw [← (map_units S m).smul_left_cancel]
simp_rw [algebraMap_smul, ← map_smul, ← smul_assoc, smul_mk'_self, algebraMap_smul, map_smul]
variable {g : R →+* P} (hg : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (g y))
variable (M) in
include M in
-- This is not an instance since the submonoid `M` would become a metavariable in typeclass search.
theorem algHom_subsingleton [Algebra R P] : Subsingleton (S →ₐ[R] P) :=
⟨fun f g =>
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective <|
IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M <| by rw [f.comp_algebraMap, g.comp_algebraMap]⟩
section AlgEquiv
variable {Q : Type*} [CommSemiring Q] [Algebra R Q] [IsLocalization M Q]
section
variable (M S Q)
/-- If `S`, `Q` are localizations of `R` at the submonoid `M` respectively,
there is an isomorphism of localizations `S ≃ₐ[R] Q`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquiv : S ≃ₐ[R] Q :=
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv S Q (RingEquiv.refl R) M.map_id with
commutes' := ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ }
end
theorem algEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : algEquiv M S Q (mk' S x y) = mk' Q x y := by
simp
theorem algEquiv_symm_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : (algEquiv M S Q).symm (mk' Q x y) = mk' S x y := by simp
variable (M) in
include M in
protected lemma bijective (f : S →+* Q) (hf : f.comp (algebraMap R S) = algebraMap R Q) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(show f = IsLocalization.algEquiv M S Q by
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext M; rw [hf]; ext; simp) ▸
(IsLocalization.algEquiv M S Q).toEquiv.bijective
end AlgEquiv
section liftAlgHom
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A]
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra A R] {M : Submonoid R}
{S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra A S] [Algebra R S] [IsScalarTower A R S]
{P : Type*} [CommSemiring P] [Algebra A P] [IsLocalization M S]
{f : R →ₐ[A] P} (hf : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (f y)) (x : S)
include hf
/-- `AlgHom` version of `IsLocalization.lift`. -/
noncomputable def liftAlgHom : S →ₐ[A] P where
__ := lift hf
commutes' r := show lift hf (algebraMap A S r) = _ by
simp [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A R S]
theorem liftAlgHom_toRingHom : (liftAlgHom hf : S →ₐ[A] P).toRingHom = lift hf := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftAlgHom : ⇑(liftAlgHom hf : S →ₐ[A] P) = lift hf := rfl
theorem liftAlgHom_apply : liftAlgHom hf x = lift hf x := rfl
end liftAlgHom
section AlgEquivOfAlgEquiv
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A]
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra A R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*)
[CommSemiring S] [Algebra A S] [Algebra R S] [IsScalarTower A R S] [IsLocalization M S]
{P : Type*} [CommSemiring P] [Algebra A P] {T : Submonoid P} (Q : Type*)
[CommSemiring Q] [Algebra A Q] [Algebra P Q] [IsScalarTower A P Q] [IsLocalization T Q]
(h : R ≃ₐ[A] P) (H : Submonoid.map h M = T)
include H
/-- If `S`, `Q` are localizations of `R` and `P` at submonoids `M`, `T` respectively,
an isomorphism `h : R ≃ₐ[A] P` such that `h(M) = T` induces an isomorphism of localizations
`S ≃ₐ[A] Q`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquivOfAlgEquiv : S ≃ₐ[A] Q where
__ := ringEquivOfRingEquiv S Q h.toRingEquiv H
commutes' _ := by dsimp; rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A R S, map_eq,
RingHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.commutes, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply A P Q]
variable {S Q h}
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_eq_map :
(algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H : S →+* Q) =
map Q (h : R →+* P) (M.le_comap_of_map_le (le_of_eq H)) :=
rfl
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_eq (x : R) :
algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H ((algebraMap R S) x) = algebraMap P Q (h x) := by
simp
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H (mk' S x y) =
mk' Q (h x) ⟨h y, show h y ∈ T from H ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem h y.2⟩ := by
simp [map_mk']
theorem algEquivOfAlgEquiv_symm : (algEquivOfAlgEquiv S Q h H).symm =
algEquivOfAlgEquiv Q S h.symm (show Submonoid.map h.symm T = M by
rw [← H, ← Submonoid.map_coe_toMulEquiv, AlgEquiv.symm_toMulEquiv,
← Submonoid.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, ← Submonoid.map_coe_toMulEquiv,
Submonoid.comap_map_eq_of_injective (h : R ≃* P).injective]) := rfl
end AlgEquivOfAlgEquiv
section at_units
variable (R M)
/-- The localization at a module of units is isomorphic to the ring. -/
noncomputable def atUnits (H : M ≤ IsUnit.submonoid R) : R ≃ₐ[R] S := by
refine AlgEquiv.ofBijective (Algebra.ofId R S) ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro x y hxy
obtain ⟨c, eq⟩ := (IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S).mp hxy
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := H c.prop
rwa [← hu, Units.mul_right_inj] at eq
· intro y
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, eq⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M y
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := H s.prop
use x * u.inv
dsimp [Algebra.ofId, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_mks]
rw [RingHom.map_mul, ← eq, ← hu, mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
simp
end at_units
end IsLocalization
section
variable (M N)
theorem isLocalization_of_algEquiv [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization M S] (h : S ≃ₐ[R] P) :
IsLocalization M P := by
constructor
· intro y
convert (IsLocalization.map_units S y).map h.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toMonoidHom
exact (h.commutes y).symm
· intro y
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M (h.symm y)
apply_fun (show S → P from h) at e
simp only [map_mul, h.apply_symm_apply, h.commutes] at e
exact ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩
· intro x y
rw [← h.symm.toEquiv.injective.eq_iff, ← IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S, ← h.symm.commutes, ←
h.symm.commutes]
exact id
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_algEquiv [Algebra R P] (h : S ≃ₐ[R] P) :
IsLocalization M S ↔ IsLocalization M P :=
⟨fun _ => isLocalization_of_algEquiv M h, fun _ => isLocalization_of_algEquiv M h.symm⟩
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_ringEquiv (h : S ≃+* P) :
IsLocalization M S ↔
haveI := (h.toRingHom.comp <| algebraMap R S).toAlgebra; IsLocalization M P :=
letI := (h.toRingHom.comp <| algebraMap R S).toAlgebra
isLocalization_iff_of_algEquiv M { h with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
variable (S) in
/-- If an algebra is simultaneously localizations for two submonoids, then an arbitrary algebra
is a localization of one submonoid iff it is a localization of the other. -/
theorem isLocalization_iff_of_isLocalization [IsLocalization M S] [IsLocalization N S]
[Algebra R P] : IsLocalization M P ↔ IsLocalization N P :=
⟨fun _ ↦ isLocalization_of_algEquiv N (algEquiv M S P),
fun _ ↦ isLocalization_of_algEquiv M (algEquiv N S P)⟩
theorem iff_of_le_of_exists_dvd (N : Submonoid R) (h₁ : M ≤ N) (h₂ : ∀ n ∈ N, ∃ m ∈ M, n ∣ m) :
IsLocalization M S ↔ IsLocalization N S :=
have : IsLocalization N (Localization M) := of_le_of_exists_dvd _ _ h₁ h₂
isLocalization_iff_of_isLocalization _ _ (Localization M)
end
variable (M)
/-- If `S₁` is the localization of `R` at `M₁` and `S₂` is the localization of
`R` at `M₂`, then every localization `T` of `S₂` at `M₁` is also a localization of
`S₁` at `M₂`, in other words `M₁⁻¹M₂⁻¹R` can be identified with `M₂⁻¹M₁⁻¹R`. -/
lemma commutes (S₁ S₂ T : Type*) [CommSemiring S₁]
[CommSemiring S₂] [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R S₁] [Algebra R S₂] [Algebra R T] [Algebra S₁ T]
[Algebra S₂ T] [IsScalarTower R S₁ T] [IsScalarTower R S₂ T] (M₁ M₂ : Submonoid R)
[IsLocalization M₁ S₁] [IsLocalization M₂ S₂]
[IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) T] :
IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₁ M₂) T where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨m, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T]
exact IsUnit.map _ (IsLocalization.map_units' ⟨a, ha⟩)
surj' a := by
obtain ⟨⟨y, -, m, hm, rfl⟩, hy⟩ := surj (M := Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) a
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₁ T] at hy
obtain ⟨⟨z, n, hn⟩, hz⟩ := IsLocalization.surj (M := M₂) y
have hunit : IsUnit (algebraMap R S₁ m) := map_units' ⟨m, hm⟩
use ⟨algebraMap R S₁ z * hunit.unit⁻¹, ⟨algebraMap R S₁ n, n, hn, rfl⟩⟩
rw [map_mul, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T]
conv_rhs => rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T, ← hz, map_mul, ← hy]
convert_to _ = a * (algebraMap S₂ T) ((algebraMap R S₂) n) *
(algebraMap S₁ T) (((algebraMap R S₁) m) * hunit.unit⁻¹.val)
· rw [map_mul]
ring
simp
exists_of_eq {x y} hxy := by
obtain ⟨r, s, d, hr, hs⟩ := IsLocalization.surj₂ M₁ S₁ x y
apply_fun (· * algebraMap S₁ T (algebraMap R S₁ d)) at hxy
simp_rw [← map_mul, hr, hs, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S₂ T] at hxy
obtain ⟨⟨-, c, hmc, rfl⟩, hc⟩ := exists_of_eq (M := Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S₂ M₁) hxy
simp_rw [← map_mul] at hc
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := IsLocalization.exists_of_eq (M := M₂) hc
use ⟨algebraMap R S₁ a, a, a.property, rfl⟩
apply (map_units S₁ d).mul_right_cancel
rw [mul_assoc, hr, mul_assoc, hs]
apply (map_units S₁ ⟨c, hmc⟩).mul_right_cancel
rw [← map_mul, ← map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm _ c, ha, map_mul, map_mul]
ring
end IsLocalization
namespace Localization
open IsLocalization
theorem mk_natCast (m : ℕ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℕ) _
variable [IsLocalization M S]
section
variable (S) (M)
/-- The localization of `R` at `M` as a quotient type is isomorphic to any other localization. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def algEquiv : Localization M ≃ₐ[R] S :=
IsLocalization.algEquiv M _ _
/-- The localization of a singleton is a singleton. Cannot be an instance due to metavariables. -/
noncomputable def _root_.IsLocalization.unique (R Rₘ) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring Rₘ]
(M : Submonoid R) [Subsingleton R] [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ] : Unique Rₘ :=
have : Inhabited Rₘ := ⟨1⟩
(algEquiv M Rₘ).symm.injective.unique
end
nonrec theorem algEquiv_mk' (x : R) (y : M) : algEquiv M S (mk' (Localization M) x y) = mk' S x y :=
algEquiv_mk' _ _
nonrec theorem algEquiv_symm_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
(algEquiv M S).symm (mk' S x y) = mk' (Localization M) x y :=
algEquiv_symm_mk' _ _
theorem algEquiv_mk (x y) : algEquiv M S (mk x y) = mk' S x y := by rw [mk_eq_mk', algEquiv_mk']
theorem algEquiv_symm_mk (x : R) (y : M) : (algEquiv M S).symm (mk' S x y) = mk x y := by
rw [mk_eq_mk', algEquiv_symm_mk']
lemma coe_algEquiv :
(Localization.algEquiv M S : Localization M →+* S) =
IsLocalization.map (M := M) (T := M) _ (RingHom.id R) le_rfl := rfl
lemma coe_algEquiv_symm :
((Localization.algEquiv M S).symm : S →+* Localization M) =
IsLocalization.map (M := M) (T := M) _ (RingHom.id R) le_rfl := rfl
end Localization
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
namespace Localization
theorem mk_intCast (m : ℤ) : (mk m 1 : Localization M) = m := by
simpa using mk_algebraMap (R := R) (A := ℤ) _
end Localization
open IsLocalization
/-- If `R` is a field, then localizing at a submonoid not containing `0` adds no new elements. -/
theorem IsField.localization_map_bijective {R Rₘ : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing Rₘ]
{M : Submonoid R} (hM : (0 : R) ∉ M) (hR : IsField R) [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap R Rₘ) := by
letI := hR.toField
replace hM := le_nonZeroDivisors_of_noZeroDivisors hM
refine ⟨IsLocalization.injective _ hM, fun x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨r, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M x
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero <| hM hm)
exact ⟨r * n, by rw [eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, ← map_mul, mul_assoc, _root_.mul_comm n, hn, mul_one]⟩
/-- If `R` is a field, then localizing at a submonoid not containing `0` adds no new elements. -/
theorem Field.localization_map_bijective {K Kₘ : Type*} [Field K] [CommRing Kₘ] {M : Submonoid K}
(hM : (0 : K) ∉ M) [Algebra K Kₘ] [IsLocalization M Kₘ] :
Function.Bijective (algebraMap K Kₘ) :=
(Field.toIsField K).localization_map_bijective hM
-- this looks weird due to the `letI` inside the above lemma, but trying to do it the other
-- way round causes issues with defeq of instances, so this is actually easier.
section Algebra
variable {S} {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ]
variable [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ]
variable [Algebra S Sₘ] [i : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
include S
section
variable (S M)
/-- Definition of the natural algebra induced by the localization of an algebra.
Given an algebra `R → S`, a submonoid `R` of `M`, and a localization `Rₘ` for `M`,
let `Sₘ` be the localization of `S` to the image of `M` under `algebraMap R S`.
Then this is the natural algebra structure on `Rₘ → Sₘ`, such that the entire square commutes,
where `localization_map.map_comp` gives the commutativity of the underlying maps.
This instance can be helpful if you define `Sₘ := Localization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M)`,
however we will instead use the hypotheses `[Algebra Rₘ Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ Sₘ]` in lemmas
since the algebra structure may arise in different ways.
-/
noncomputable def localizationAlgebra : Algebra Rₘ Sₘ :=
(map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :
Rₘ →+* Sₘ).toAlgebra
end
section
variable [Algebra Rₘ Sₘ] [Algebra R Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ Sₘ] [IsScalarTower R S Sₘ]
variable (S Rₘ Sₘ)
theorem IsLocalization.map_units_map_submonoid (y : M) : IsUnit (algebraMap R Sₘ y) := by
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply _ S]
exact IsLocalization.map_units Sₘ ⟨algebraMap R S y, Algebra.mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem y⟩
-- can't be simp, as `S` only appears on the RHS
theorem IsLocalization.algebraMap_mk' (x : R) (y : M) :
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ (IsLocalization.mk' Rₘ x y) =
IsLocalization.mk' Sₘ (algebraMap R S x)
⟨algebraMap R S y, Algebra.mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem y⟩ := by
rw [IsLocalization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, Subtype.coe_mk, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ Sₘ,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ Sₘ, ← map_mul, mul_comm,
IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
exact congr_arg (algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ) (IsLocalization.mk'_mul_cancel_left x y)
variable (M)
/-- If the square below commutes, the bottom map is uniquely specified:
```
R → S
↓ ↓
Rₘ → Sₘ
```
-/
theorem IsLocalization.algebraMap_eq_map_map_submonoid :
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ =
map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :=
Eq.symm <|
IsLocalization.map_unique _ (algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ) fun x => by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S Sₘ, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ Sₘ]
/-- If the square below commutes, the bottom map is uniquely specified:
```
R → S
↓ ↓
Rₘ → Sₘ
```
-/
theorem IsLocalization.algebraMap_apply_eq_map_map_submonoid (x) :
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ x =
map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (IsLocalization.algebraMap_eq_map_map_submonoid _ _ _ _) x
theorem IsLocalization.lift_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap :
IsLocalization.lift (M := M) (IsLocalization.map_units_map_submonoid S Sₘ) =
algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ :=
IsLocalization.lift_unique _ fun _ => (IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm
end
variable (Rₘ Sₘ)
theorem localizationAlgebraMap_def :
@algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S) =
map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :=
rfl
/-- Injectivity of the underlying `algebraMap` descends to the algebra induced by localization. -/
theorem localizationAlgebra_injective (hRS : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) :
Function.Injective (@algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S)) :=
have : IsLocalization (M.map (algebraMap R S)) Sₘ := i
IsLocalization.map_injective_of_injective _ _ _ hRS
end Algebra
end CommRing
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean | 723 | 725 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,912 | 1,915 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
/-!
# Internally graded rings and algebras
This module provides `DirectSum.GSemiring` and `DirectSum.GCommSemiring` instances for a collection
of subobjects `A` when a `SetLike.GradedMonoid` instance is available:
* `SetLike.gnonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`
* `SetLike.gsemiring`
* `SetLike.gcommSemiring`
With these instances in place, it provides the bundled canonical maps out of a direct sum of
subobjects into their carrier type:
* `DirectSum.coeRingHom` (a `RingHom` version of `DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom`)
* `DirectSum.coeAlgHom` (an `AlgHom` version of `DirectSum.coeLinearMap`)
Strictly the definitions in this file are not sufficient to fully define an "internal" direct sum;
to represent this case, `(h : DirectSum.IsInternal A) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]` is
needed. In the future there will likely be a data-carrying, constructive, typeclass version of
`DirectSum.IsInternal` for providing an explicit decomposition function.
When `iSupIndep (Set.range A)` (a weaker condition than
`DirectSum.IsInternal A`), these provide a grading of `⨆ i, A i`, and the
mapping `⨁ i, A i →+ ⨆ i, A i` can be obtained as
`DirectSum.toAddMonoid (fun i ↦ AddSubmonoid.inclusion <| le_iSup A i)`.
This file also provides some extra structure on `A 0`, namely:
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subsemiring`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instSemiring`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instCommSemiring`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subring`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instRing`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instCommRing`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subalgebra`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instAlgebra`
## Tags
internally graded ring
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι : Type*} {σ S R : Type*}
theorem SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded [Zero ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (s : S) : algebraMap S R s ∈ A 0 := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact (A 0).smul_mem s <| SetLike.one_mem_graded _
theorem SetLike.natCast_mem_graded [Zero ι] [AddMonoidWithOne R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (n : ℕ) : (n : R) ∈ A 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
rw [Nat.cast_zero]
| exact zero_mem (A 0)
| succ _ n_ih =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
exact add_mem n_ih (SetLike.one_mem_graded _)
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Internal.lean | 66 | 69 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} :
∀ n, s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| 0, h => bisim h
| n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} : s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a :: corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1 :: corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a :: unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n))) = get s₁ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons]
rw [get_interleave_left n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem get_interleave_right : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n + 1) = get s₂ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n + 1))) = get s₂ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons,
get_interleave_right n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem mem_interleave_left {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_interleave_left])
theorem mem_interleave_right {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_interleave_right])
theorem odd_eq (s : Stream' α) : odd s = even (tail s) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_even (s : Stream' α) : head (even s) = head s :=
rfl
theorem tail_even (s : Stream' α) : tail (even s) = even (tail (tail s)) := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]
rfl
theorem even_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (s : Stream' α) : even (a₁::a₂::s) = a₁::even s := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem even_tail (s : Stream' α) : even (tail s) = odd s :=
rfl
theorem even_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : even (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁' s₁ => ∃ s₂, s₁' = even (s₁ ⋈ s₂))
(fun s₁' s₁ ⟨s₂, h₁⟩ => by
rw [h₁]
constructor
· rfl
· exact ⟨tail s₂, by rw [interleave_eq, even_cons_cons, tail_cons]⟩)
(Exists.intro s₂ rfl)
theorem interleave_even_odd (s₁ : Stream' α) : even s₁ ⋈ odd s₁ = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s' s => s' = even s ⋈ odd s)
(fun s' s (h : s' = even s ⋈ odd s) => by
rw [h]; constructor
· rfl
· simp [odd_eq, odd_eq, tail_interleave, tail_even])
rfl
theorem get_even : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α), get (even s) n = get s (2 * n)
| 0, _ => rfl
| succ n, s => by
change get (even s) (succ n) = get s (succ (succ (2 * n)))
rw [get_succ, get_succ, tail_even, get_even n]; rfl
theorem get_odd : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α), get (odd s) n = get s (2 * n + 1) := fun n s => by
rw [odd_eq, get_even]; rfl
theorem mem_of_mem_even (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ even s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_even])
theorem mem_of_mem_odd (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ odd s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_odd])
@[simp] theorem nil_append_stream (s : Stream' α) : appendStream' [] s = s :=
rfl
theorem cons_append_stream (a : α) (l : List α) (s : Stream' α) :
appendStream' (a::l) s = a::appendStream' l s :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem append_append_stream : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : List α) (s : Stream' α),
l₁ ++ l₂ ++ₛ s = l₁ ++ₛ (l₂ ++ₛ s)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| List.cons a l₁, l₂, s => by
rw [List.cons_append, cons_append_stream, cons_append_stream, append_append_stream l₁]
lemma get_append_left (h : n < x.length) : (x ++ₛ a).get n = x[n] := by
induction' x with b x ih generalizing n
· simp at h
· rcases n with (_ | n)
· simp
· simp [ih n (by simpa using h), cons_append_stream]
@[simp] lemma get_append_right : (x ++ₛ a).get (x.length + n) = a.get n := by
induction' x <;> simp [Nat.succ_add, *, cons_append_stream]
@[simp] lemma get_append_length : (x ++ₛ a).get x.length = a.get 0 := get_append_right 0 x a
lemma append_right_injective (h : x ++ₛ a = x ++ₛ b) : a = b := by
ext n; replace h := congr_arg (fun a ↦ a.get (x.length + n)) h; simpa using h
@[simp] lemma append_right_inj : x ++ₛ a = x ++ₛ b ↔ a = b :=
⟨append_right_injective x a b, by simp +contextual⟩
lemma append_left_injective (h : x ++ₛ a = y ++ₛ b) (hl : x.length = y.length) : x = y := by
apply List.ext_getElem hl
intros
rw [← get_append_left, ← get_append_left, h]
theorem map_append_stream (f : α → β) :
∀ (l : List α) (s : Stream' α), map f (l ++ₛ s) = List.map f l ++ₛ map f s
| [], _ => rfl
| List.cons a l, s => by
rw [cons_append_stream, List.map_cons, map_cons, cons_append_stream, map_append_stream f l]
theorem drop_append_stream : ∀ (l : List α) (s : Stream' α), drop l.length (l ++ₛ s) = s
| [], s => by rfl
| List.cons a l, s => by
rw [List.length_cons, drop_succ, cons_append_stream, tail_cons, drop_append_stream l s]
theorem append_stream_head_tail (s : Stream' α) : [head s] ++ₛ tail s = s := by
simp
theorem mem_append_stream_right : ∀ {a : α} (l : List α) {s : Stream' α}, a ∈ s → a ∈ l ++ₛ s
| _, [], _, h => h
| a, List.cons _ l, s, h =>
have ih : a ∈ l ++ₛ s := mem_append_stream_right l h
mem_cons_of_mem _ ih
theorem mem_append_stream_left : ∀ {a : α} {l : List α} (s : Stream' α), a ∈ l → a ∈ l ++ₛ s
| _, [], _, h => absurd h List.not_mem_nil
| a, List.cons b l, s, h =>
Or.elim (List.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) (fun aeqb : a = b => Exists.intro 0 aeqb)
fun ainl : a ∈ l => mem_cons_of_mem b (mem_append_stream_left s ainl)
@[simp]
theorem take_zero (s : Stream' α) : take 0 s = [] :=
rfl
-- This lemma used to be simp, but we removed it from the simp set because:
-- 1) It duplicates the (often large) `s` term, resulting in large tactic states.
-- 2) It conflicts with the very useful `dropLast_take` lemma below (causing nonconfluence).
theorem take_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : take (succ n) s = head s::take n (tail s) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem take_succ_cons {a : α} (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) :
take (n+1) (a::s) = a :: take n s := rfl
theorem take_succ' {s : Stream' α} : ∀ n, s.take (n+1) = s.take n ++ [s.get n]
| 0 => rfl
| n+1 => by rw [take_succ, take_succ' n, ← List.cons_append, ← take_succ, get_tail]
@[simp]
theorem length_take (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : (take n s).length = n := by
induction n generalizing s <;> simp [*, take_succ]
@[simp]
theorem take_take {s : Stream' α} : ∀ {m n}, (s.take n).take m = s.take (min n m)
| 0, n => by rw [Nat.min_zero, List.take_zero, take_zero]
| m, 0 => by rw [Nat.zero_min, take_zero, List.take_nil]
| m+1, n+1 => by rw [take_succ, List.take_succ_cons, Nat.succ_min_succ, take_succ, take_take]
@[simp] theorem concat_take_get {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.take n ++ [s.get n] = s.take (n + 1) :=
(take_succ' n).symm
theorem getElem?_take {s : Stream' α} : ∀ {k n}, k < n → (s.take n)[k]? = s.get k
| 0, _+1, _ => by simp only [length_take, zero_lt_succ, List.getElem?_eq_getElem]; rfl
| k+1, n+1, h => by
rw [take_succ, List.getElem?_cons_succ, getElem?_take (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h), get_succ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias get?_take := getElem?_take
theorem getElem?_take_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) :
(take (succ n) s)[n]? = some (get s n) :=
getElem?_take (Nat.lt_succ_self n)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias get?_take_succ := getElem?_take_succ
@[simp] theorem dropLast_take {n : ℕ} {xs : Stream' α} :
(Stream'.take n xs).dropLast = Stream'.take (n-1) xs := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n => rw [take_succ', List.dropLast_concat, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
@[simp]
theorem append_take_drop : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
appendStream' (take n s) (drop n s) = s := by
intro n
induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [take_succ, drop_succ, cons_append_stream, ih (tail s), Stream'.eta]
lemma append_take : x ++ (a.take n) = (x ++ₛ a).take (x.length + n) := by
induction' x <;> simp [take, Nat.add_comm, cons_append_stream, *]
@[simp] lemma take_get (h : m < (a.take n).length) : (a.take n)[m] = a.get m := by
nth_rw 2 [← append_take_drop n a]; rw [get_append_left]
theorem take_append_of_le_length (h : n ≤ x.length) :
(x ++ₛ a).take n = x.take n := by
apply List.ext_getElem (by simp [h])
intro _ _ _; rw [List.getElem_take, take_get, get_append_left]
lemma take_add : a.take (m + n) = a.take m ++ (a.drop m).take n := by
apply append_left_injective _ _ (a.drop (m + n)) ((a.drop m).drop n) <;>
simp [- drop_drop]
@[gcongr] lemma take_prefix_take_left (h : m ≤ n) : a.take m <+: a.take n := by
rw [(by simp [h] : a.take m = (a.take n).take m)]
apply List.take_prefix
@[simp] lemma take_prefix : a.take m <+: a.take n ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.length_le, take_prefix_take_left m n a⟩
lemma map_take (f : α → β) : (a.take n).map f = (a.map f).take n := by
apply List.ext_getElem <;> simp
|
lemma take_drop : (a.drop m).take n = (a.take (m + n)).drop m := by
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 586 | 587 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Path
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Equiv
/-!
# Contractible spaces
In this file, we define `ContractibleSpace`, a space that is homotopy equivalent to `Unit`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContinuousMap
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
/-- A map is nullhomotopic if it is homotopic to a constant map. -/
def Nullhomotopic (f : C(X, Y)) : Prop :=
∃ y : Y, Homotopic f (ContinuousMap.const _ y)
theorem nullhomotopic_of_constant (y : Y) : Nullhomotopic (ContinuousMap.const X y) :=
⟨y, by rfl⟩
theorem Nullhomotopic.comp_right {f : C(X, Y)} (hf : f.Nullhomotopic) (g : C(Y, Z)) :
(g.comp f).Nullhomotopic := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf
use g y
| exact Homotopic.hcomp hy (Homotopic.refl g)
theorem Nullhomotopic.comp_left {f : C(Y, Z)} (hf : f.Nullhomotopic) (g : C(X, Y)) :
(f.comp g).Nullhomotopic := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Contractible.lean | 32 | 36 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
import Mathlib.Computability.TMConfig
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
The files `TMConfig` and `TMToPartrec` define a simplified basis for partial recursive functions,
and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open List (Vector)
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## Simulating sequentialized partial recursive functions in TM2
At this point we have a sequential model of partial recursive functions: the `Cfg` type and
`step : Cfg → Option Cfg` function from `TMConfig.lean`. The key feature of this model is that
it does a finite amount of computation (in fact, an amount which is statically bounded by the size
of the program) between each step, and no individual step can diverge (unlike the compositional
semantics, where every sub-part of the computation is potentially divergent). So we can utilize the
same techniques as in the other TM simulations in `Computability.TuringMachine` to prove that
each step corresponds to a finite number of steps in a lower level model. (We don't prove it here,
but in anticipation of the complexity class P, the simulation is actually polynomial-time as well.)
The target model is `Turing.TM2`, which has a fixed finite set of stacks, a bit of local storage,
with programs selected from a potentially infinite (but finitely accessible) set of program
positions, or labels `Λ`, each of which executes a finite sequence of basic stack commands.
For this program we will need four stacks, each on an alphabet `Γ'` like so:
inductive Γ' | consₗ | cons | bit0 | bit1
We represent a number as a bit sequence, lists of numbers by putting `cons` after each element, and
lists of lists of natural numbers by putting `consₗ` after each list. For example:
0 ~> []
1 ~> [bit1]
6 ~> [bit0, bit1, bit1]
[1, 2] ~> [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons]
[[], [1, 2]] ~> [consₗ, bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ]
The four stacks are `main`, `rev`, `aux`, `stack`. In normal mode, `main` contains the input to the
current program (a `List ℕ`) and `stack` contains data (a `List (List ℕ)`) associated to the
current continuation, and in `ret` mode `main` contains the value that is being passed to the
continuation and `stack` contains the data for the continuation. The `rev` and `aux` stacks are
usually empty; `rev` is used to store reversed data when e.g. moving a value from one stack to
another, while `aux` is used as a temporary for a `main`/`stack` swap that happens during `cons₁`
evaluation.
The only local store we need is `Option Γ'`, which stores the result of the last pop
operation. (Most of our working data are natural numbers, which are too large to fit in the local
store.)
The continuations from the previous section are data-carrying, containing all the values that have
been computed and are awaiting other arguments. In order to have only a finite number of
continuations appear in the program so that they can be used in machine states, we separate the
data part (anything with type `List ℕ`) from the `Cont` type, producing a `Cont'` type that lacks
this information. The data is kept on the `stack` stack.
Because we want to have subroutines for e.g. moving an entire stack to another place, we use an
infinite inductive type `Λ'` so that we can execute a program and then return to do something else
without having to define too many different kinds of intermediate states. (We must nevertheless
prove that only finitely many labels are accessible.) The labels are:
* `move p k₁ k₂ q`: move elements from stack `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds of the value being moved.
The last element, that fails `p`, is placed in neither stack but left in the local store.
At the end of the operation, `k₂` will have the elements of `k₁` in reverse order. Then do `q`.
* `clear p k q`: delete elements from stack `k` until `p` is true. Like `move`, the last element is
left in the local storage. Then do `q`.
* `copy q`: Move all elements from `rev` to both `main` and `stack` (in reverse order),
then do `q`. That is, it takes `(a, b, c, d)` to `(b.reverse ++ a, [], c, b.reverse ++ d)`.
* `push k f q`: push `f s`, where `s` is the local store, to stack `k`, then do `q`. This is a
duplicate of the `push` instruction that is part of the TM2 model, but by having a subroutine
just for this purpose we can build up programs to execute inside a `goto` statement, where we
have the flexibility to be general recursive.
* `read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')`: go to state `f s` where `s` is the local store. Again this is only
here for convenience.
* `succ q`: perform a successor operation. Assuming `[n]` is encoded on `main` before,
`[n+1]` will be on main after. This implements successor for binary natural numbers.
* `pred q₁ q₂`: perform a predecessor operation or `case` statement. If `[]` is encoded on
`main` before, then we transition to `q₁` with `[]` on main; if `(0 :: v)` is on `main` before
then `v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₁`; and if `(n+1 :: v)` is on `main`
before then `n :: v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₂`.
* `ret k`: call continuation `k`. Each continuation has its own interpretation of the data in
`stack` and sets up the data for the next continuation.
* `ret (cons₁ fs k)`: `v :: KData` on `stack` and `ns` on `main`, and the next step expects
`v` on `main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`. So we have to do a little dance here with six
reverse-moves using the `aux` stack to perform a three-point swap, each of which involves two
reversals.
* `ret (cons₂ k)`: `ns :: KData` is on `stack` and `v` is on `main`, and we have to put
`ns.headI :: v` on `main` and `KData` on `stack`. This is done using the `head` subroutine.
* `ret (fix f k)`: This stores no data, so we just check if `main` starts with `0` and
if so, remove it and call `k`, otherwise `clear` the first value and call `f`.
* `ret halt`: the stack is empty, and `main` has the output. Do nothing and halt.
In addition to these basic states, we define some additional subroutines that are used in the
above:
* `push'`, `peek'`, `pop'` are special versions of the builtins that use the local store to supply
inputs and outputs.
* `unrev`: special case `move false rev main` to move everything from `rev` back to `main`. Used as
a cleanup operation in several functions.
* `moveExcl p k₁ k₂ q`: same as `move` but pushes the last value read back onto the source stack.
* `move₂ p k₁ k₂ q`: double `move`, so that the result comes out in the right order at the target
stack. Implemented as `moveExcl p k rev; move false rev k₂`. Assumes that neither `k₁` nor `k₂`
is `rev` and `rev` is initially empty.
* `head k q`: get the first natural number from stack `k` and reverse-move it to `rev`, then clear
the rest of the list at `k` and then `unrev` to reverse-move the head value to `main`. This is
used with `k = main` to implement regular `head`, i.e. if `v` is on `main` before then `[v.headI]`
will be on `main` after; and also with `k = stack` for the `cons` operation, which has `v` on
`main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`, and results in `KData` on `stack` and `ns.headI :: v` on
`main`.
* `trNormal` is the main entry point, defining states that perform a given `code` computation.
It mostly just dispatches to functions written above.
The main theorem of this section is `tr_eval`, which asserts that for each that for each code `c`,
the state `init c v` steps to `halt v'` in finitely many steps if and only if
`Code.eval c v = some v'`.
-/
namespace PartrecToTM2
section
open ToPartrec
/-- The alphabet for the stacks in the program. `bit0` and `bit1` are used to represent `ℕ` values
as lists of binary digits, `cons` is used to separate `List ℕ` values, and `consₗ` is used to
separate `List (List ℕ)` values. See the section documentation. -/
inductive Γ'
| consₗ
| cons
| bit0
| bit1
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
/-- The four stacks used by the program. `main` is used to store the input value in `trNormal`
mode and the output value in `Λ'.ret` mode, while `stack` is used to keep all the data for the
continuations. `rev` is used to store reversed lists when transferring values between stacks, and
`aux` is only used once in `cons₁`. See the section documentation. -/
inductive K'
| main
| rev
| aux
| stack
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open K'
/-- Continuations as in `ToPartrec.Cont` but with the data removed. This is done because we want
the set of all continuations in the program to be finite (so that it can ultimately be encoded into
the finite state machine of a Turing machine), but a continuation can handle a potentially infinite
number of data values during execution. -/
inductive Cont'
| halt
| cons₁ : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| cons₂ : Cont' → Cont'
| comp : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| fix : Code → Cont' → Cont'
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
/-- The set of program positions. We make extensive use of inductive types here to let us describe
"subroutines"; for example `clear p k q` is a program that clears stack `k`, then does `q` where
`q` is another label. In order to prevent this from resulting in an infinite number of distinct
accessible states, we are careful to be non-recursive (although loops are okay). See the section
documentation for a description of all the programs. -/
inductive Λ'
| move (p : Γ' → Bool) (k₁ k₂ : K') (q : Λ')
| clear (p : Γ' → Bool) (k : K') (q : Λ')
| copy (q : Λ')
| push (k : K') (s : Option Γ' → Option Γ') (q : Λ')
| read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')
| succ (q : Λ')
| pred (q₁ q₂ : Λ')
| ret (k : Cont')
compile_inductive% Code
compile_inductive% Cont'
compile_inductive% K'
compile_inductive% Λ'
instance Λ'.instInhabited : Inhabited Λ' :=
⟨Λ'.ret Cont'.halt⟩
instance Λ'.instDecidableEq : DecidableEq Λ' := fun a b => by
induction a generalizing b <;> cases b <;> first
| apply Decidable.isFalse; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩; done
| exact decidable_of_iff' _ (by simp [funext_iff]; rfl)
/-- The type of TM2 statements used by this machine. -/
def Stmt' :=
TM2.Stmt (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
/-- The type of TM2 configurations used by this machine. -/
def Cfg' :=
TM2.Cfg (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
open TM2.Stmt
/-- A predicate that detects the end of a natural number, either `Γ'.cons` or `Γ'.consₗ` (or
implicitly the end of the list), for use in predicate-taking functions like `move` and `clear`. -/
@[simp]
def natEnd : Γ' → Bool
| Γ'.consₗ => true
| Γ'.cons => true
| _ => false
attribute [nolint simpNF] natEnd.eq_3
/-- Pop a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def pop' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
pop k fun _ v => v
/-- Peek a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def peek' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
peek k fun _ v => v
/-- Push the value in the local store to the given stack. -/
@[simp]
def push' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
push k fun x => x.iget
/-- Move everything from the `rev` stack to the `main` stack (reversed). -/
def unrev :=
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev main
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds, with the last element being left on `k₁`. -/
def moveExcl (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ <| Λ'.push k₁ id q
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` without reversion, by performing a double move via the `rev`
stack. -/
def move₂ (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
moveExcl p k₁ rev <| Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev k₂ q
/-- Assuming `trList v` is on the front of stack `k`, remove it, and push `v.headI` onto `main`.
See the section documentation. -/
def head (k : K') (q : Λ') : Λ' :=
Λ'.move natEnd k rev <|
(Λ'.push rev fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <|
Λ'.read fun s =>
(if s = some Γ'.consₗ then id else Λ'.clear (fun x => x = Γ'.consₗ) k) <| unrev q
/-- The program that evaluates code `c` with continuation `k`. This expects an initial state where
`trList v` is on `main`, `trContStack k` is on `stack`, and `aux` and `rev` are empty.
See the section documentation for details. -/
@[simp]
def trNormal : Code → Cont' → Λ'
| Code.zero', k => (Λ'.push main fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.succ, k => head main <| Λ'.succ <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.tail, k => Λ'.clear natEnd main <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.cons f fs, k =>
(Λ'.push stack fun _ => some Γ'.consₗ) <|
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) main rev <| Λ'.copy <| trNormal f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)
| Code.comp f g, k => trNormal g (Cont'.comp f k)
| Code.case f g, k => Λ'.pred (trNormal f k) (trNormal g k)
| Code.fix f, k => trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
/-- The main program. See the section documentation for details. -/
def tr : Λ' → Stmt'
| Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q =>
pop' k₁ <|
branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)
| Λ'.push k f q =>
branch (fun s => (f s).isSome) ((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q)
(goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.read q => goto q
| Λ'.clear p k q =>
pop' k <| branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)
| Λ'.copy q =>
pop' rev <|
branch Option.isSome (push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.succ q =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1) ((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =>
goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k) => goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k) => goto fun _ => trNormal f k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k) =>
pop' main <|
goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
| Λ'.ret Cont'.halt => (load fun _ => none) <| halt
@[simp]
theorem tr_move (p k₁ k₂ q) : tr (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q) =
pop' k₁ (branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_push (k f q) : tr (Λ'.push k f q) = branch (fun s => (f s).isSome)
((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => q) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_read (q) : tr (Λ'.read q) = goto q := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_clear (p k q) : tr (Λ'.clear p k q) = pop' k (branch
(fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_copy (q) : tr (Λ'.copy q) = pop' rev (branch Option.isSome
(push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_succ (q) : tr (Λ'.succ q) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_pred (q₁ q₂) : tr (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₁ (fs k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)) = goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₂ (k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k)) =
goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_comp (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k)) = goto fun _ => trNormal f k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_fix (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k)) = pop' main (goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_halt : tr (Λ'.ret Cont'.halt) = (load fun _ => none) halt := rfl
/-- Translating a `Cont` continuation to a `Cont'` continuation simply entails dropping all the
data. This data is instead encoded in `trContStack` in the configuration. -/
def trCont : Cont → Cont'
| Cont.halt => Cont'.halt
| Cont.cons₁ c _ k => Cont'.cons₁ c (trCont k)
| Cont.cons₂ _ k => Cont'.cons₂ (trCont k)
| Cont.comp c k => Cont'.comp c (trCont k)
| Cont.fix c k => Cont'.fix c (trCont k)
/-- We use `PosNum` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. A natural number is
represented as a little-endian list of `bit0` and `bit1` elements:
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
In particular, this representation guarantees no trailing `bit0`'s at the end of the list. -/
def trPosNum : PosNum → List Γ'
| PosNum.one => [Γ'.bit1]
| PosNum.bit0 n => Γ'.bit0 :: trPosNum n
| PosNum.bit1 n => Γ'.bit1 :: trPosNum n
/-- We use `Num` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. Positive numbers are
translated using `trPosNum`, and `trNum 0 = []`. So there are never any trailing `bit0`'s in
a translated `Num`.
0 = []
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
-/
def trNum : Num → List Γ'
| Num.zero => []
| Num.pos n => trPosNum n
/-- Because we use binary encoding, we define `trNat` in terms of `trNum`, using `Num`, which are
binary natural numbers. (We could also use `Nat.binaryRecOn`, but `Num` and `PosNum` make for
easy inductions.) -/
def trNat (n : ℕ) : List Γ' :=
trNum n
@[simp]
theorem trNat_zero : trNat 0 = [] := by rw [trNat, Nat.cast_zero]; rfl
theorem trNat_default : trNat default = [] :=
trNat_zero
/-- Lists are translated with a `cons` after each encoded number.
For example:
[] = []
[0] = [cons]
[1] = [bit1, cons]
[6, 0] = [bit0, bit1, bit1, cons, cons]
-/
@[simp]
def trList : List ℕ → List Γ'
| [] => []
| n::ns => trNat n ++ Γ'.cons :: trList ns
/-- Lists of lists are translated with a `consₗ` after each encoded list.
For example:
[] = []
[[]] = [consₗ]
[[], []] = [consₗ, consₗ]
[[0]] = [cons, consₗ]
[[1, 2], [0]] = [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ, cons, consₗ]
-/
@[simp]
def trLList : List (List ℕ) → List Γ'
| [] => []
| l::ls => trList l ++ Γ'.consₗ :: trLList ls
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
@[simp]
def contStack : Cont → List (List ℕ)
| Cont.halt => []
| Cont.cons₁ _ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.cons₂ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.comp _ k => contStack k
| Cont.fix _ k => contStack k
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
def trContStack (k : Cont) :=
trLList (contStack k)
/-- This is the nondependent eliminator for `K'`, but we use it specifically here in order to
represent the stack data as four lists rather than as a function `K' → List Γ'`, because this makes
rewrites easier. The theorems `K'.elim_update_main` et. al. show how such a function is updated
after an `update` to one of the components. -/
def K'.elim (a b c d : List Γ') : K' → List Γ'
| K'.main => a
| K'.rev => b
| K'.aux => c
| K'.stack => d
-- The equation lemma of `elim` simplifies to `match` structures.
theorem K'.elim_main (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.main = a := rfl
theorem K'.elim_rev (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.rev = b := rfl
theorem K'.elim_aux (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.aux = c := rfl
theorem K'.elim_stack (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.stack = d := rfl
attribute [simp] K'.elim
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_main {a b c d a'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) main a' = K'.elim a' b c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_rev {a b c d b'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) rev b' = K'.elim a b' c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_aux {a b c d c'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) aux c' = K'.elim a b c' d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_stack {a b c d d'} :
update (K'.elim a b c d) stack d' = K'.elim a b c d' := by funext x; cases x <;> rfl
/-- The halting state corresponding to a `List ℕ` output value. -/
def halt (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨none, none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
/-- The `Cfg` states map to `Cfg'` states almost one to one, except that in normal operation the
local store contains an arbitrary garbage value. To make the final theorem cleaner we explicitly
clear it in the halt state so that there is exactly one configuration corresponding to output `v`.
-/
def TrCfg : Cfg → Cfg' → Prop
| Cfg.ret k v, c' =>
∃ s, c' = ⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩
| Cfg.halt v, c' => c' = halt v
/-- This could be a general list definition, but it is also somewhat specialized to this
application. `splitAtPred p L` will search `L` for the first element satisfying `p`.
If it is found, say `L = l₁ ++ a :: l₂` where `a` satisfies `p` but `l₁` does not, then it returns
`(l₁, some a, l₂)`. Otherwise, if there is no such element, it returns `(L, none, [])`. -/
def splitAtPred {α} (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α × Option α × List α
| [] => ([], none, [])
| a :: as =>
cond (p a) ([], some a, as) <|
let ⟨l₁, o, l₂⟩ := splitAtPred p as
⟨a::l₁, o, l₂⟩
theorem splitAtPred_eq {α} (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L l₁ o l₂,
(∀ x ∈ l₁, p x = false) →
Option.elim' (L = l₁ ∧ l₂ = []) (fun a => p a = true ∧ L = l₁ ++ a::l₂) o →
splitAtPred p L = (l₁, o, l₂)
| [], _, none, _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
| [], l₁, some o, l₂, _, ⟨_, h₃⟩ => by simp at h₃
| a :: L, l₁, o, l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [splitAtPred]
have IH := splitAtPred_eq p L
rcases o with - | o
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨⟩, rfl⟩
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH L none [] _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩]
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨h₂, ⟨⟩⟩
· rw [h₂, cond]
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH l₁ (some o) l₂ _ ⟨h₂, _⟩] <;> try rfl
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
theorem splitAtPred_false {α} (L : List α) : splitAtPred (fun _ => false) L = (L, none, []) :=
splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => rfl) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem move_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ k₂)
(e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, o, update (update S k₁ L₂) k₂ (L₁.reverseAux (S k₂))⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· rw [(_ : [].reverseAux _ = _), Function.update_eq_self]
swap
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h₁.symm, List.reverseAux_nil]
refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux]
revert e; rcases S k₁ with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons, Option.iget_some] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
simp only [e]
rfl
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', Option.elim, TM2.stepAux, push']
rcases e₁ : S k₁ with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, ne_eq, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update (update S k₁ Sk) k₂ (a :: S k₂)) _ using 2 <;>
simp [Function.update_of_ne, h₁, h₁.symm, e₃, List.reverseAux]
simp [Function.update_comm h₁.symm]
theorem unrev_ok {q s} {S : K' → List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (unrev q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S rev []) main (List.reverseAux (S rev) (S main))⟩ :=
move_ok (by decide) <| splitAtPred_false _
theorem move₂_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ rev ∧ k₂ ≠ rev ∧ k₁ ≠ k₂)
(h₂ : S rev = []) (e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (move₂ p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S k₁ (o.elim id List.cons L₂)) k₂ (L₁ ++ S k₂)⟩ := by
refine (move_ok h₁.1 e).trans (TransGen.head rfl ?_)
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, id_eq, ne_eq, Option.elim]
cases o <;> simp only [Option.elim] <;> rw [tr]
<;> simp only [id, TM2.stepAux, Option.isSome, cond_true, cond_false]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [Function.update_comm h₁.1, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, List.reverseAux_eq, h₂, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, List.reverse_reverse]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [h₂, Function.update_comm h₁.1, List.reverseAux_eq, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1, Function.update_self, List.reverse_reverse]
theorem clear_ok {p k q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (e : splitAtPred p (S k) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.clear p k q), s, S⟩ ⟨some q, o, update S k L₂⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
revert e; rcases S k with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
rcases e with ⟨e₁, e₂⟩
rw [e₁, e₂]
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
rcases e₁ : S k with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update S k Sk) _ using 2 <;> simp [e₃]
theorem copy_ok (q s a b c d) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.copy q), s, K'.elim a b c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (List.reverseAux b a) [] c (List.reverseAux b d)⟩ := by
induction' b with x b IH generalizing a d s
· refine TransGen.single ?_
simp
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_rev, List.head?_cons, Option.isSome_some,
List.tail_cons, elim_update_rev, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_update_main,
elim_stack, elim_update_stack, cond_true, List.reverseAux_cons, pop', push']
exact IH _ _ _
theorem trPosNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trPosNum n, natEnd x = false
| PosNum.one, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
| PosNum.bit1 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit1 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
theorem trNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trNum n, natEnd x = false
| Num.pos n, x, h => trPosNum_natEnd n x h
theorem trNat_natEnd (n) : ∀ x ∈ trNat n, natEnd x = false :=
trNum_natEnd _
theorem trList_ne_consₗ : ∀ (l), ∀ x ∈ trList l, x ≠ Γ'.consₗ
| a :: l, x, h => by
simp only [trList, List.mem_append, List.mem_cons] at h
obtain h | rfl | h := h
· rintro rfl
cases trNat_natEnd _ _ h
· rintro ⟨⟩
· exact trList_ne_consₗ l _ h
theorem head_main_ok {q s L} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (head main q), s, K'.elim (trList L) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [L.headI]) [] c d⟩ := by
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn L none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat L.headI) o (trList L.tail) (trNat_natEnd _) ?_)).trans
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
· cases L <;> simp [o]
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_update_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev,
Function.update_self, trList]
rw [if_neg (show o ≠ some Γ'.consₗ by cases L <;> simp [o])]
refine (clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ none [] ?_ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)).trans ?_
· exact fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)
convert unrev_ok using 2; simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem head_stack_ok {q s L₁ L₂ L₃} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (head stack q), s, K'.elim (trList L₁) [] [] (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList (L₂.headI :: L₁)) [] [] L₃⟩ := by
rcases L₂ with - | ⟨a, L₂⟩
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ [] (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃ (by rintro _ ⟨⟩) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_true, id_eq, trList, List.nil_append,
elim_update_stack, elim_rev, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_nil, trNat_default]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat a) (some Γ'.cons) (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)
(trNat_natEnd _) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_false, trList, List.append_assoc,
List.cons_append, elim_update_stack, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_cons]
refine
TransGen.trans
(clear_ok
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trList L₂) (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem succ_ok {q s n} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.succ q), s, K'.elim (trList [n]) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [n.succ]) [] c d⟩ := by
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, decide_false, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, decide_true, Function.update_self,
cond_true, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 1
simp only [elim_update_rev, elim_rev, elim_main, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_main]
rfl
simp only [trNum, Num.succ, Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a.succ) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some q.succ, s, K'.elim (trPosNum a ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp? [List.reverseAux] at e says simp only [List.reverseAux, List.reverseAux_eq] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m _ generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, [Γ'.bit1], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (Γ'.bit0 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp [PosNum.succ, trPosNum]
rfl
· refine ⟨l₁, _, some Γ'.bit0, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step]; rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.stepAux, pop', elim_main, elim_update_main, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq]
rfl
theorem pred_ok (q₁ q₂ s v) (c d : List Γ') : ∃ s',
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] c d⟩
(v.headI.rec ⟨some q₁, s', K'.elim (trList v.tail) [] c d⟩ fun n _ =>
⟨some q₂, s', K'.elim (trList (n::v.tail)) [] c d⟩) := by
rcases v with (_ | ⟨_ | n, v⟩)
· refine ⟨none, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
· refine ⟨some Γ'.cons, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
refine ⟨none, ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, trNum, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ,
List.tail_cons, List.headI_cons]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· simp only [trPosNum, Num.succ', List.singleton_append, List.nil_append]
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
simp only [Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (q₁.pred q₂), s, K'.elim (trPosNum a.succ ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q₂), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp only [List.reverseAux] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m IH generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit1::l₁, [], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum, show PosNum.one.succ = PosNum.one.bit0 from rfl]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (some Γ'.bit0) (Γ'.bit1 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp
rfl
· obtain ⟨a, l, e, h⟩ : ∃ a l, (trPosNum m = a::l) ∧ natEnd a = false := by
cases m <;> refine ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, _, some a, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp [trPosNum, PosNum.succ, e, h, show some Γ'.bit1 ≠ some Γ'.bit0 by decide,
Option.iget, -natEnd]
rfl
theorem trNormal_respects (c k v s) :
∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepNormal c k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (trNormal c (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction c generalizing k v s with
| zero' => refine ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, TransGen.single ?_⟩; simp
| succ => refine ⟨_, ⟨none, rfl⟩, head_main_ok.trans succ_ok⟩
| tail =>
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn v none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine ⟨_, ⟨o, rfl⟩, ?_⟩; convert clear_ok _ using 2
· simp; rfl
swap
refine splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI) _ _ (trNat_natEnd _) ?_
cases v <;> simp [o]
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf (Cont.cons₁ fs v k) v none
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| (move_ok (by decide) (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, elim_stack, elim_update_stack, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev]
refine (copy_ok _ none [] (trList v).reverse _ _).trans ?_
convert h₂ using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq, trContStack]
| comp f _ _ IHg => exact IHg (Cont.comp f k) v s
| case f g IHf IHg =>
rw [stepNormal]
simp only
obtain ⟨s', h⟩ := pred_ok _ _ s v _ _
revert h; rcases v.headI with - | n <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHg k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
| fix f IH => apply IH
theorem tr_ret_respects (k v s) : ∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepRet k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction k generalizing v s with
| halt => exact ⟨_, rfl, TransGen.single rfl⟩
| cons₁ fs as k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects fs (Cont.cons₂ v k) as none
refine ⟨s', h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩; simp
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, id_eq, elim_update_main, elim_main, elim_aux,
List.append_nil, elim_update_aux]
refine (move₂_ok (L₁ := ?_) (o := ?_) (L₂ := ?_) (by decide) rfl ?_).trans ?_
pick_goal 4
· exact splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ (some Γ'.consₗ) _
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, elim_update_stack, elim_main,
List.append_nil, elim_update_main, id_eq, elim_update_aux, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_aux, elim_stack]
exact h₂
| cons₂ ns k IH =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH (ns.headI :: v) none
exact ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| head_stack_ok.trans h₂⟩
| comp f k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f k v s
exact ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl h₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [stepRet]
have :
if v.headI = 0 then natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = true ∧ (trList v).tail = trList v.tail
else
natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = false ∧
(trList v).tail = (trNat v.headI).tail ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v.tail := by
obtain - | n := v
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases n with - | n
· simp
rw [trList, List.headI, trNat, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ, List.tail]
cases (n : Num).succ' <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
by_cases h : v.headI = 0 <;> simp only [h, ite_true, ite_false] at this ⊢
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH v.tail (trList v).head?
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this, elim_update_main]
exact h₂
· obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f (Cont.fix f k) v.tail (some Γ'.cons)
refine ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| TransGen.trans ?_ h₂⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this.1]
convert clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI).tail (some Γ'.cons) _ _ _) using 2
· simp
convert rfl
· exact fun x h => trNat_natEnd _ _ (List.tail_subset _ h)
· exact ⟨rfl, this.2⟩
theorem tr_respects : Respects step (TM2.step tr) TrCfg
| Cfg.ret _ _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => tr_ret_respects _ _ _
| Cfg.halt _, _, rfl => rfl
/-- The initial state, evaluating function `c` on input `v`. -/
def init (c : Code) (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨some (trNormal c Cont'.halt), none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
theorem tr_init (c v) :
∃ b, TrCfg (stepNormal c Cont.halt v) b ∧ Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) (init c v) b :=
trNormal_respects _ _ _ _
theorem tr_eval (c v) : eval (TM2.step tr) (init c v) = halt <$> Code.eval c v := by
obtain ⟨i, h₁, h₂⟩ := tr_init c v
refine Part.ext fun x => ?_
rw [reaches_eval h₂.to_reflTransGen]; simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc₁, hc₂⟩ := tr_eval_rev tr_respects h₁ h
simp [stepNormal_eval] at hc₂
obtain ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩ := hc₂
exact ⟨_, hv, hc₁.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩
have := Turing.tr_eval (b₁ := Cfg.halt v') tr_respects h₁
simp only [stepNormal_eval, Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff, Cfg.halt.injEq,
exists_eq_right] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩ := this hv
exact h
/-- The set of machine states reachable via downward label jumps, discounting jumps via `ret`. -/
def trStmts₁ : Λ' → Finset Λ'
| Q@(Λ'.move _ _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.push _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.read q) => insert Q <| Finset.univ.biUnion fun s => trStmts₁ (q s)
| Q@(Λ'.clear _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.copy q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.succ q) => insert Q <| insert (unrev q) <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ insert (unrev q₂) (trStmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(Λ'.ret _) => {Q}
theorem trStmts₁_trans {q q'} : q' ∈ trStmts₁ q → trStmts₁ q' ⊆ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
all_goals
simp +contextual only [trStmts₁, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union,
or_imp, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.Subset.refl, imp_true_iff, true_and]
repeat exact fun h => Finset.Subset.trans (q_ih h) (Finset.subset_insert _ _)
· simp
intro s h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr ⟨_, q_ih s h h'⟩
· constructor
· rintro rfl
apply Finset.subset_insert
· intro h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| q_ih h h')
· refine ⟨fun h x h' => ?_, fun _ x h' => ?_, fun h x h' => ?_⟩ <;> simp
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inl <| q₁_ih h h')
· rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h' with h' | h' <;> simp [h', unrev]
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inr <| q₂_ih h h')
theorem trStmts₁_self (q) : q ∈ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q <;> · first |apply Finset.mem_singleton_self|apply Finset.mem_insert_self
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c`,
including the state `ret k` but not any states after that (that is, the states visited while
evaluating `k`). -/
def codeSupp' : Code → Cont' → Finset Λ'
| c@Code.zero', k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.succ, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.tail, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@(Code.cons f fs), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) ∪
(trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k))))
| c@(Code.comp f g), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' g (Cont'.comp f k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (trNormal f k) ∪ codeSupp' f k))
| c@(Code.case f g), k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪ (codeSupp' f k ∪ codeSupp' g k)
| c@(Code.fix f), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.fix f k) ∪
(trStmts₁ (Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) ∪ {Λ'.ret k}))
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp'_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp' c k := by
cases c <;> first | rfl | exact Finset.union_subset_left (fun _ a ↦ a)
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of a continuation
`k`, not including the initial state `ret k`. -/
def contSupp : Cont' → Finset Λ'
| Cont'.cons₁ fs k =>
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k))
| Cont'.cons₂ k => trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.comp f k => codeSupp' f k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.fix f k => codeSupp' (Code.fix f) k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.halt => ∅
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c` in
continuation `k`. This is actually closed under forward simulation (see `tr_supports`), and the
existence of this set means that the machine constructed in this section is in fact a proper
Turing machine, with a finite set of states. -/
def codeSupp (c : Code) (k : Cont') : Finset Λ' :=
codeSupp' c k ∪ contSupp k
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp c k :=
Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp'_self _ _) (Finset.union_subset_left fun _ a ↦ a)
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_zero (k) : codeSupp Code.zero' k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.zero' k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_succ (k) : codeSupp Code.succ k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.succ k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_tail (k) : codeSupp Code.tail k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.tail k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_cons (f fs k) :
codeSupp (Code.cons f fs) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.cons f fs) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_comp (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.comp f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.comp f g) k) ∪ codeSupp g (Cont'.comp f k) := by
simp only [codeSupp, codeSupp', trNormal, Finset.union_assoc, contSupp]
rw [← Finset.union_assoc _ _ (contSupp k),
Finset.union_eq_right.2 (codeSupp'_self _ _)]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_case (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.case f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.case f g) k) ∪ (codeSupp f k ∪ codeSupp g k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_fix (f k) :
codeSupp (Code.fix f) k = trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.fix f) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm,
Finset.union_left_idem]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₁ (fs k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
codeSupp fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₂ (k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₂ k) = trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_comp (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.comp f k) = codeSupp f k :=
rfl
theorem contSupp_fix (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.fix f k) = codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp +contextual [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc,
Finset.subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_halt : contSupp Cont'.halt = ∅ :=
rfl
/-- The statement `Λ'.Supports S q` means that `contSupp k ⊆ S` for any `ret k`
reachable from `q`.
(This is a technical condition used in the proof that the machine is supported.) -/
def Λ'.Supports (S : Finset Λ') : Λ' → Prop
| Λ'.move _ _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.push _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.read q => ∀ s, Λ'.Supports S (q s)
| Λ'.clear _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.copy q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.succ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ => Λ'.Supports S q₁ ∧ Λ'.Supports S q₂
| Λ'.ret k => contSupp k ⊆ S
/-- A shorthand for the predicate that we are proving in the main theorems `trStmts₁_supports`,
`codeSupp'_supports`, `contSupp_supports`, `codeSupp_supports`. The set `S` is fixed throughout
the proof, and denotes the full set of states in the machine, while `K` is a subset that we are
currently proving a property about. The predicate asserts that every state in `K` is closed in `S`
under forward simulation, i.e. stepping forward through evaluation starting from any state in `K`
stays entirely within `S`. -/
def Supports (K S : Finset Λ') :=
∀ q ∈ K, TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q)
theorem supports_insert {K S q} :
Supports (insert q K) S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) ∧ Supports K S := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_singleton {S q} : Supports {q} S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_union {K₁ K₂ S} : Supports (K₁ ∪ K₂) S ↔ Supports K₁ S ∧ Supports K₂ S := by
simp [Supports, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem supports_biUnion {K : Option Γ' → Finset Λ'} {S} :
Supports (Finset.univ.biUnion K) S ↔ ∀ a, Supports (K a) S := by
simpa [Supports] using forall_swap
theorem head_supports {S k q} (H : (q : Λ').Supports S) : (head k q).Supports S := fun _ => by
dsimp only; split_ifs <;> exact H
theorem ret_supports {S k} (H₁ : contSupp k ⊆ S) : TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr (Λ'.ret k)) := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
cases k with
| halt => trivial
| cons₁ => rw [contSupp_cons₁, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| cons₂ => rw [contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| comp => rw [contSupp_comp] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁ (codeSupp_self _ _ W)
| fix =>
rw [contSupp_fix] at H₁
have L := @Finset.mem_union_left; have R := @Finset.mem_union_right
intro s; dsimp only; cases natEnd s.iget
· refine H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| L _ W)
· exact H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| R _ <| Finset.mem_singleton_self _)
theorem trStmts₁_supports {S q} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (HS₁ : trStmts₁ q ⊆ S) :
Supports (trStmts₁ q) S := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
simp [trStmts₁, -Finset.singleton_subset_iff] at HS₁ ⊢
any_goals
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 HS₁
first | have h₃ := h₂ W | try simp [Finset.subset_iff] at h₂
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- move
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- clear
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- copy
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- push
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨fun _ => h₂ _ W, ?_⟩ -- read
exact supports_biUnion.2 fun _ => q_ih _ (H₁ _) fun _ h => h₂ _ h
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩ -- succ
exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ W, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂.2⟩
· refine -- pred
supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl W),
fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr W), fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact q₁_ih H₁.1 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl h)
· exact q₂_ih H₁.2 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr h)
· exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports H₁) -- ret
theorem trStmts₁_supports' {S q K} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (H₂ : trStmts₁ q ∪ K ⊆ S)
(H₃ : K ⊆ S → Supports K S) : Supports (trStmts₁ q ∪ K) S := by
simp only [Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact supports_union.2 ⟨trStmts₁_supports H₁ H₂.1, H₃ H₂.2⟩
theorem trNormal_supports {S c k} (Hk : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : (trNormal c k).Supports S := by
induction c generalizing k with simp [Λ'.Supports, head]
| zero' => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| succ => intro; split_ifs <;> exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| tail => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
apply IHf
rw [codeSupp_cons] at Hk
exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| comp f g _ IHg => apply IHg; rw [codeSupp_comp] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| case f g IHf IHg =>
simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at Hk
exact ⟨IHf Hk.2.1, IHg Hk.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf => apply IHf; rw [codeSupp_fix] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
theorem codeSupp'_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp' c k) S := by
induction c generalizing k with
| cons f fs IHf IHfs =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_cons, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun h => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2, H.2⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHfs ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₁] at H'
exact Finset.union_subset_right (Finset.union_subset_right H'.2)
exact
trStmts₁_supports (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
(Finset.union_subset_right h)
| comp f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; rw [codeSupp_comp] at H'; have H' := Finset.union_subset_right H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHg H', ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2, H.2⟩
exact IHf (Finset.union_subset_right H')
| case f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun _ => ?_
exact supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2.1, IHg H'.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_fix, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp, trStmts₁,
Finset.insert_subset_iff] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨H.1.1, h⟩, H.2⟩
exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
| _ => exact trStmts₁_supports (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp_self _ _) H)
theorem contSupp_supports {S k} (H : contSupp k ⊆ S) : Supports (contSupp k) S := by
induction k with
| halt => simp [contSupp_halt, Supports]
| cons₁ f k IH =>
have H₁ := H; rw [contSupp_cons₁] at H₁; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H₁
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H₂) H₁ fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H₂, ?_⟩
simp only [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports H₂.2.2) (Finset.union_subset_right h) IH
| cons₂ k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_cons₂] at H'
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H') H' IH
| comp f k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_comp] at H'; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H'
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H', IH H₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [contSupp] at H
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, IH (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
theorem codeSupp_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp c k) S :=
supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, contSupp_supports (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
/-- The set `codeSupp c k` is a finite set that witnesses the effective finiteness of the `tr`
Turing machine. Starting from the initial state `trNormal c k`, forward simulation uses only
states in `codeSupp c k`, so this is a finite state machine. Even though the underlying type of
state labels `Λ'` is infinite, for a given partial recursive function `c` and continuation `k`,
only finitely many states are accessed, corresponding roughly to subterms of `c`. -/
theorem tr_supports (c k) : @TM2.Supports _ _ _ _ ⟨trNormal c k⟩ tr (codeSupp c k) :=
⟨codeSupp_self _ _ (trStmts₁_self _), fun _ => codeSupp_supports (Finset.Subset.refl _) _⟩
end
end PartrecToTM2
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 1,364 | 1,367 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Theta
/-!
# Asymptotic equivalence
In this file, we define the relation `IsEquivalent l u v`, which means that `u-v` is little o of
`v` along the filter `l`.
Unlike `Is(Little|Big)O` relations, this one requires `u` and `v` to have the same codomain `β`.
While the definition only requires `β` to be a `NormedAddCommGroup`, most interesting properties
require it to be a `NormedField`.
## Notations
We introduce the notation `u ~[l] v := IsEquivalent l u v`, which you can use by opening the
`Asymptotics` locale.
## Main results
If `β` is a `NormedAddCommGroup` :
- `_ ~[l] _` is an equivalence relation
- Equivalent statements for `u ~[l] const _ c` :
- If `c ≠ 0`, this is true iff `Tendsto u l (𝓝 c)` (see `isEquivalent_const_iff_tendsto`)
- For `c = 0`, this is true iff `u =ᶠ[l] 0` (see `isEquivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero`)
If `β` is a `NormedField` :
- Alternative characterization of the relation (see `isEquivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul`) :
`u ~[l] v ↔ ∃ (φ : α → β) (hφ : Tendsto φ l (𝓝 1)), u =ᶠ[l] φ * v`
- Provided some non-vanishing hypothesis, this can be seen as `u ~[l] v ↔ Tendsto (u/v) l (𝓝 1)`
(see `isEquivalent_iff_tendsto_one`)
- For any constant `c`, `u ~[l] v` implies `Tendsto u l (𝓝 c) ↔ Tendsto v l (𝓝 c)`
(see `IsEquivalent.tendsto_nhds_iff`)
- `*` and `/` are compatible with `_ ~[l] _` (see `IsEquivalent.mul` and `IsEquivalent.div`)
If `β` is a `NormedLinearOrderedField` :
- If `u ~[l] v`, we have `Tendsto u l atTop ↔ Tendsto v l atTop`
(see `IsEquivalent.tendsto_atTop_iff`)
## Implementation Notes
Note that `IsEquivalent` takes the parameters `(l : Filter α) (u v : α → β)` in that order.
This is to enable `calc` support, as `calc` requires that the last two explicit arguments are `u v`.
-/
namespace Asymptotics
open Filter Function
open Topology
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable {α β : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Two functions `u` and `v` are said to be asymptotically equivalent along a filter `l`
(denoted as `u ~[l] v` in the `Asymptotics` namespace)
when `u x - v x = o(v x)` as `x` converges along `l`. -/
def IsEquivalent (l : Filter α) (u v : α → β) :=
(u - v) =o[l] v
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation:50 u " ~[" l:50 "] " v:50 => Asymptotics.IsEquivalent l u v
variable {u v w : α → β} {l : Filter α}
theorem IsEquivalent.isLittleO (h : u ~[l] v) : (u - v) =o[l] v := h
nonrec theorem IsEquivalent.isBigO (h : u ~[l] v) : u =O[l] v :=
(IsBigO.congr_of_sub h.isBigO.symm).mp (isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem IsEquivalent.isBigO_symm (h : u ~[l] v) : v =O[l] u := by
convert h.isLittleO.right_isBigO_add
simp
theorem IsEquivalent.isTheta (h : u ~[l] v) : u =Θ[l] v :=
⟨h.isBigO, h.isBigO_symm⟩
theorem IsEquivalent.isTheta_symm (h : u ~[l] v) : v =Θ[l] u :=
⟨h.isBigO_symm, h.isBigO⟩
@[refl]
theorem IsEquivalent.refl : u ~[l] u := by
rw [IsEquivalent, sub_self]
exact isLittleO_zero _ _
@[symm]
theorem IsEquivalent.symm (h : u ~[l] v) : v ~[l] u :=
(h.isLittleO.trans_isBigO h.isBigO_symm).symm
@[trans]
theorem IsEquivalent.trans {l : Filter α} {u v w : α → β} (huv : u ~[l] v) (hvw : v ~[l] w) :
u ~[l] w :=
(huv.isLittleO.trans_isBigO hvw.isBigO).triangle hvw.isLittleO
theorem IsEquivalent.congr_left {u v w : α → β} {l : Filter α} (huv : u ~[l] v) (huw : u =ᶠ[l] w) :
w ~[l] v :=
huv.congr' (huw.sub (EventuallyEq.refl _ _)) (EventuallyEq.refl _ _)
theorem IsEquivalent.congr_right {u v w : α → β} {l : Filter α} (huv : u ~[l] v) (hvw : v =ᶠ[l] w) :
u ~[l] w :=
(huv.symm.congr_left hvw).symm
theorem isEquivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero : u ~[l] 0 ↔ u =ᶠ[l] 0 := by
rw [IsEquivalent, sub_zero]
exact isLittleO_zero_right_iff
theorem isEquivalent_zero_iff_isBigO_zero : u ~[l] 0 ↔ u =O[l] (0 : α → β) := by
refine ⟨IsEquivalent.isBigO, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [isEquivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero, eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem]
exact ⟨{ x : α | u x = 0 }, isBigO_zero_right_iff.mp h, fun x hx ↦ hx⟩
theorem isEquivalent_const_iff_tendsto {c : β} (h : c ≠ 0) :
u ~[l] const _ c ↔ Tendsto u l (𝓝 c) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [IsEquivalent, const, isLittleO_const_iff h]
constructor <;> intro h
· have := h.sub (tendsto_const_nhds (x := -c))
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this
exact this
· have := h.sub (tendsto_const_nhds (x := c))
rwa [sub_self] at this
theorem IsEquivalent.tendsto_const {c : β} (hu : u ~[l] const _ c) : Tendsto u l (𝓝 c) := by
rcases em <| c = 0 with rfl | h
· exact (tendsto_congr' <| isEquivalent_zero_iff_eventually_zero.mp hu).mpr tendsto_const_nhds
· exact (isEquivalent_const_iff_tendsto h).mp hu
theorem IsEquivalent.tendsto_nhds {c : β} (huv : u ~[l] v) (hu : Tendsto u l (𝓝 c)) :
Tendsto v l (𝓝 c) := by
by_cases h : c = 0
· subst c
rw [← isLittleO_one_iff ℝ] at hu ⊢
simpa using (huv.symm.isLittleO.trans hu).add hu
· rw [← isEquivalent_const_iff_tendsto h] at hu ⊢
exact huv.symm.trans hu
theorem IsEquivalent.tendsto_nhds_iff {c : β} (huv : u ~[l] v) :
Tendsto u l (𝓝 c) ↔ Tendsto v l (𝓝 c) :=
⟨huv.tendsto_nhds, huv.symm.tendsto_nhds⟩
theorem IsEquivalent.add_isLittleO (huv : u ~[l] v) (hwv : w =o[l] v) : u + w ~[l] v := by
simpa only [IsEquivalent, add_sub_right_comm] using huv.add hwv
theorem IsEquivalent.sub_isLittleO (huv : u ~[l] v) (hwv : w =o[l] v) : u - w ~[l] v := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using huv.add_isLittleO hwv.neg_left
theorem IsLittleO.add_isEquivalent (hu : u =o[l] w) (hv : v ~[l] w) : u + v ~[l] w :=
add_comm v u ▸ hv.add_isLittleO hu
theorem IsLittleO.isEquivalent (huv : (u - v) =o[l] v) : u ~[l] v := huv
theorem IsEquivalent.neg (huv : u ~[l] v) : (fun x ↦ -u x) ~[l] fun x ↦ -v x := by
rw [IsEquivalent]
convert huv.isLittleO.neg_left.neg_right
simp [neg_add_eq_sub]
end NormedAddCommGroup
open Asymptotics
section NormedField
variable {α β : Type*} [NormedField β] {u v : α → β} {l : Filter α}
theorem isEquivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul :
u ~[l] v ↔ ∃ (φ : α → β) (_ : Tendsto φ l (𝓝 1)), u =ᶠ[l] φ * v := by
rw [IsEquivalent, isLittleO_iff_exists_eq_mul]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨φ, hφ, h⟩ <;> [refine ⟨φ + 1, ?_, ?_⟩; refine ⟨φ - 1, ?_, ?_⟩]
· conv in 𝓝 _ => rw [← zero_add (1 : β)]
exact hφ.add tendsto_const_nhds
· convert h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l v) <;> simp [add_mul]
· conv in 𝓝 _ => rw [← sub_self (1 : β)]
exact hφ.sub tendsto_const_nhds
· convert h.sub (EventuallyEq.refl l v); simp [sub_mul]
theorem IsEquivalent.exists_eq_mul (huv : u ~[l] v) :
∃ (φ : α → β) (_ : Tendsto φ l (𝓝 1)), u =ᶠ[l] φ * v :=
isEquivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul.mp huv
theorem isEquivalent_of_tendsto_one (hz : ∀ᶠ x in l, v x = 0 → u x = 0)
(huv : Tendsto (u / v) l (𝓝 1)) : u ~[l] v := by
rw [isEquivalent_iff_exists_eq_mul]
exact ⟨u / v, huv, hz.mono fun x hz' ↦ (div_mul_cancel_of_imp hz').symm⟩
theorem isEquivalent_of_tendsto_one' (hz : ∀ x, v x = 0 → u x = 0) (huv : Tendsto (u / v) l (𝓝 1)) :
u ~[l] v :=
isEquivalent_of_tendsto_one (Eventually.of_forall hz) huv
theorem isEquivalent_iff_tendsto_one (hz : ∀ᶠ x in l, v x ≠ 0) :
u ~[l] v ↔ Tendsto (u / v) l (𝓝 1) := by
constructor
· intro hequiv
have := hequiv.isLittleO.tendsto_div_nhds_zero
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_div] at this
have key : Tendsto (fun x ↦ v x / v x) l (𝓝 1) :=
(tendsto_congr' <| hz.mono fun x hnz ↦ @div_self _ _ (v x) hnz).mpr tendsto_const_nhds
convert this.add key
· simp
· norm_num
· exact isEquivalent_of_tendsto_one (hz.mono fun x hnvz hz ↦ (hnvz hz).elim)
end NormedField
section SMul
theorem IsEquivalent.smul {α E 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{a b : α → 𝕜} {u v : α → E} {l : Filter α} (hab : a ~[l] b) (huv : u ~[l] v) :
| (fun x ↦ a x • u x) ~[l] fun x ↦ b x • v x := by
rcases hab.exists_eq_mul with ⟨φ, hφ, habφ⟩
have : ((fun x ↦ a x • u x) - (fun x ↦ b x • v x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ b x • (φ x • u x - v x) := by
convert (habφ.comp₂ (· • ·) <| EventuallyEq.refl _ u).sub
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/AsymptoticEquivalent.lean | 218 | 221 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℂ g x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivAt h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ g s x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableWithinAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℂ g s)
(h0 : Set.MapsTo f s slitPlane) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).cpow (hg x hx) (h0 hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s :=
hf.cpow (differentiableOn_const c) h0
theorem Differentiable.cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f) (hg : Differentiable ℂ g)
(h0 : ∀ x, f x ∈ slitPlane) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).cpow (hg x) (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.const_cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiable_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] :
Differentiable ℂ fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
differentiable_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiableAt_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] (t : ℂ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s) t :=
differentiableAt_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end fderiv
section deriv
open Complex
variable {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `HasFDerivAt.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `HasDerivAt.cpow`. -/
private theorem aux : ((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' := by
simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul']
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa using (hf.cpow hg h0).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h).comp x hf
theorem Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun z : ℂ => z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x := by
simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
(hasStrictDerivAt_id x).cpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x c) h
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') s x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
/-- Although `fun x => x ^ r` for fixed `r` is *not* complex-differentiable along the negative real
line, it is still real-differentiable, and the derivative is what one would formally expect.
See `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const` for an alternate formulation. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ -1) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← Ne] at hr
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hx.symm with (hx | hx)
· -- easy case : `0 < x`
apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (e := fun y => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1))
convert HasDerivAt.div_const (𝕜 := ℂ) ?_ (r + 1) using 1
· exact (mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr).symm
· convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
· -- harder case : `x < 0`
have : ∀ᶠ y : ℝ in 𝓝 x,
(y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) = (-y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) * exp (π * I * (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
refine Filter.eventually_of_mem (Iio_mem_nhds hx) fun y hy => ?_
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hy)]
refine HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hx)]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-↑y) ^ (r + 1) * exp (↑π * I * (r + 1)))
((r + 1) * (-↑x) ^ r * exp (↑π * I * r)) x by
convert this.div_const (r + 1) using 1
conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr]
rw [mul_add ((π : ℂ) * _), mul_one, exp_add, exp_pi_mul_I, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) (-1 : ℂ),
neg_one_mul]
simp_rw [mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← ofReal_neg]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (↑(-y) : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) (-(r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) x by
convert this.neg.mul_const _ using 1; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) (-x) by
convert @HasDerivAt.scomp ℝ _ ℂ _ _ x ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this (hasDerivAt_neg x) using 1
rw [real_smul, ofReal_neg 1, ofReal_one]; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) ↑(-x) by
exact this.comp_ofReal
conv in ↑_ ^ _ => rw [(by ring : r = r + 1 - 1)]
convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id ((-x : ℝ) : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-15")] alias hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow := hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'
/-- An alternate formulation of `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ r) (r * x ^ (r - 1)) x := by
have := HasDerivAt.const_mul r <| hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' hx
(by rwa [ne_eq, sub_eq_neg_self])
simpa [sub_add_cancel, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr] using this
/-- A version of `DifferentiableAt.cpow_const` for a real function. -/
theorem DifferentiableAt.ofReal_cpow_const {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h0 : f x ≠ 0) (h1 : c ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun (y : ℝ) => (f y : ℂ) ^ c) x :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const h0 h1).differentiableAt.comp x hf
theorem Complex.deriv_cpow_const (hx : x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ x ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const hx).hasDerivAt.deriv
/-- A version of `Complex.deriv_cpow_const` for a real variable. -/
theorem Complex.deriv_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x : ℂ) ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc).deriv
theorem deriv_cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hx : f x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ f x ^ c) x = c * f x ^ (c - 1) * deriv f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.cpow_const hx).deriv
theorem isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop {c : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =Θ[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
calc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ c * x ^ (c - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with x hx using by rw [deriv_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ ‖(x : ℂ) ^ (c - 1)‖ :=
(Asymptotics.IsTheta.of_norm_eventuallyEq EventuallyEq.rfl).const_mul_left hc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x ↦ x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx, sub_re, one_re]
theorem isBigO_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop (c : ℂ) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· simp_rw [cpow_zero, deriv_const', Asymptotics.isBigO_zero]
· exact (isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop hc).1
end deriv
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is strictly differentiable at `p : ℝ × ℝ` such that `0 < p.fst`. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : 0 < p.1) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℝ ℝ ℝ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℝ ℝ ℝ) p := by
have : (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
(continuousAt_fst.eventually (lt_mem_nhds hp)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_pos hp _
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
convert ((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.log hp.ne').mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).exp using 1
rw [rpow_sub_one hp.ne', ← rpow_def_of_pos hp, smul_add, smul_smul, mul_div_left_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv, smul_smul, smul_smul, mul_assoc, add_comm]
/-- `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is strictly differentiable at `p : ℝ × ℝ` such that `p.fst < 0`. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_neg (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 < 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℝ ℝ ℝ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1 - exp (log p.1 * p.2) * sin (p.2 * π) * π) •
ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℝ ℝ ℝ) p := by
have : (fun x : ℝ × ℝ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) * cos (x.2 * π) :=
(continuousAt_fst.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hp)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_neg hp _
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
convert ((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.log hp.ne).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).exp.mul
(hasStrictFDerivAt_snd.mul_const π).cos using 1
simp_rw [rpow_sub_one hp.ne, smul_add, ← add_assoc, smul_smul, ← add_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm (cos _), ← rpow_def_of_neg hp]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_comm]; congr 2 <;> ring
/-- The function `fun (x, y) => x ^ y` is infinitely smooth at `(x, y)` unless `x = 0`. -/
theorem contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 ≠ 0) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => p.1 ^ p.2) p := by
rcases hp.lt_or_lt with hneg | hpos
exacts
[(((contDiffAt_fst.log hneg.ne).mul contDiffAt_snd).exp.mul
(contDiffAt_snd.mul contDiffAt_const).cos).congr_of_eventuallyEq
((continuousAt_fst.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hneg)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_neg hp _),
((contDiffAt_fst.log hpos.ne').mul contDiffAt_snd).exp.congr_of_eventuallyEq
((continuousAt_fst.eventually (lt_mem_nhds hpos)).mono fun p hp => rpow_def_of_pos hp _)]
theorem differentiableAt_rpow_of_ne (p : ℝ × ℝ) (hp : p.1 ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => p.1 ^ p.2) p :=
(contDiffAt_rpow_of_ne p hp).differentiableAt le_rfl
theorem _root_.HasStrictDerivAt.rpow {f g : ℝ → ℝ} {f' g' : ℝ} (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x) (h : 0 < f x) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(f' * g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) + g' * f x ^ g x * Real.log (f x)) x := by
convert (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_pos ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x
(hf.prodMk hg) using 1
simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (p : ℝ) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => x ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) x := by
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· have := (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_neg (x, p) hx).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x
((hasStrictDerivAt_id x).prodMk (hasStrictDerivAt_const x p))
convert this using 1; simp
· simpa using (hasStrictDerivAt_id x).rpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x p) hx
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (x : ℝ) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => a ^ x) (a ^ x * log a) x := by
simpa using (hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _).rpow (hasStrictDerivAt_id x) ha
lemma differentiableAt_rpow_const_of_ne (p : ℝ) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => x ^ p) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne hx p).differentiableAt
lemma differentiableOn_rpow_const (p : ℝ) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => (x : ℝ) ^ p) {0}ᶜ :=
fun _ hx => (Real.differentiableAt_rpow_const_of_ne p hx).differentiableWithinAt
/-- This lemma says that `fun x => a ^ x` is strictly differentiable for `a < 0`. Note that these
values of `a` are outside of the "official" domain of `a ^ x`, and we may redefine `a ^ x`
for negative `a` if some other definition will be more convenient. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_rpow_of_neg {a x : ℝ} (ha : a < 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => a ^ x) (a ^ x * log a - exp (log a * x) * sin (x * π) * π) x := by
simpa using (hasStrictFDerivAt_rpow_of_neg (a, x) ha).comp_hasStrictDerivAt x
((hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _).prodMk (hasStrictDerivAt_id _))
end Real
namespace Real
variable {z x y : ℝ}
| theorem hasDerivAt_rpow_const {x p : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ p) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => x ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) x := by
rcases ne_or_eq x 0 with (hx | rfl)
· exact (hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne hx _).hasDerivAt
replace h : 1 ≤ p := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
apply hasDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_ne fun x hx =>
(hasStrictDerivAt_rpow_const_of_ne hx p).hasDerivAt
exacts [continuousAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr (zero_le_one.trans h)),
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 396 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
| @[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 474 | 474 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
| theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 37 | 40 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
/-! # sublists
`List.Sublists` gives a list of all (not necessarily contiguous) sublists of a list.
This file contains basic results on this function.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Nat
namespace List
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper definition for `sublists'` -/
def sublists'Aux (a : α) (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r₁.foldl (init := r₂) fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl (a : α) : ∀ (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = ((r₁.toArray).foldl (init := r₂.toArray)
(fun r l => r.push (a :: l))).toList := by
intro r₁ r₂
rw [sublists'Aux, Array.foldl_toList]
have := List.foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => r.push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]) (l := r₁) (init := r₂.toArray) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux (l : List α) :
sublists' l = l.foldr (fun a r => sublists'Aux a r r) [[]] := by
simp only [sublists', sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl]
rw [← List.foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_map (a : α) (r₁ : List (List α)) : ∀ (r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = r₂ ++ map (cons a) r₁ :=
List.reverseRecOn r₁ (fun _ => by simp [sublists'Aux]) fun r₁ l ih r₂ => by
rw [map_append, map_singleton, ← append_assoc, ← ih, sublists'Aux, foldl_append, foldl]
simp [sublists'Aux]
@[simp 900]
theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) := by
simp [sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux, foldr_cons, sublists'Aux_eq_map]
@[simp]
| theorem mem_sublists' {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t := by
induction' t with a t IH generalizing s
· simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h], eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sublists.lean | 68 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic with cardinals
This file collects results about the cardinality of different ordinal operations.
-/
universe u v
open Cardinal Ordinal Set
/-! ### Cardinal operations with ordinal indices -/
namespace Cardinal
/-- Bounds the cardinal of an ordinal-indexed union of sets. -/
lemma mk_iUnion_Ordinal_lift_le_of_le {β : Type v} {o : Ordinal.{u}} {c : Cardinal.{v}}
(ho : lift.{v} o.card ≤ lift.{u} c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (A : Ordinal → Set β)
(hA : ∀ j < o, #(A j) ≤ c) : #(⋃ j < o, A j) ≤ c := by
simp_rw [← mem_Iio, biUnion_eq_iUnion, iUnion, iSup, ← o.enumIsoToType.symm.surjective.range_comp]
rw [← lift_le.{u}]
apply ((mk_iUnion_le_lift _).trans _).trans_eq (mul_eq_self (aleph0_le_lift.2 hc))
rw [mk_toType]
refine mul_le_mul' ho (ciSup_le' ?_)
intro i
simpa using hA _ (o.enumIsoToType.symm i).2
lemma mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le {β : Type*} {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal}
(ho : o.card ≤ c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (A : Ordinal → Set β)
(hA : ∀ j < o, #(A j) ≤ c) : #(⋃ j < o, A j) ≤ c := by
apply mk_iUnion_Ordinal_lift_le_of_le _ hc A hA
rwa [Cardinal.lift_le]
end Cardinal
@[deprecated mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le (since := "2024-11-02")]
alias Ordinal.Cardinal.mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le := mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
theorem lift_card_iSup_le_sum_card {ι : Type u} [Small.{v} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{v}) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (⨆ i, f i).card ≤ Cardinal.sum fun i ↦ (f i).card := by
simp_rw [← mk_toType]
rw [← mk_sigma, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v} #(Σ _, _), ← Cardinal.lift_umax.{v, u}]
apply lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective (f := enumIsoToType _ ∘ (⟨(enumIsoToType _).symm ·.2,
(mem_Iio.mp ((enumIsoToType _).symm _).2).trans_le (Ordinal.le_iSup _ _)⟩))
rw [EquivLike.comp_surjective]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff.mp hx
exact ⟨⟨i, enumIsoToType _ ⟨x, hi⟩⟩, by simp⟩
theorem card_iSup_le_sum_card {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ i, f i).card ≤ Cardinal.sum (fun i ↦ (f i).card) := by
have := lift_card_iSup_le_sum_card f
rwa [Cardinal.lift_id'] at this
theorem card_iSup_Iio_le_sum_card {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : Iio o → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ a : Iio o, f a).card ≤ Cardinal.sum fun i ↦ (f ((enumIsoToType o).symm i)).card := by
apply le_of_eq_of_le (congr_arg _ _).symm (card_iSup_le_sum_card _)
simpa using (enumIsoToType o).symm.iSup_comp (g := fun x ↦ f x)
theorem card_iSup_Iio_le_card_mul_iSup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : Iio o → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ a : Iio o, f a).card ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} o.card * ⨆ a : Iio o, (f a).card := by
apply (card_iSup_Iio_le_sum_card f).trans
convert ← sum_le_iSup_lift _
· exact mk_toType o
· exact (enumIsoToType o).symm.iSup_comp (g := fun x ↦ (f x).card)
theorem card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left {a : Ordinal} (ha : ω ≤ a) (b : Ordinal) :
(a ^ b).card ≤ max a.card b.card := by
refine limitRecOn b ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa using one_lt_omega0.le.trans ha
· intro b IH
rw [opow_succ, card_mul, card_succ, Cardinal.mul_eq_max_of_aleph0_le_right, max_comm]
· apply (max_le_max_left _ IH).trans
rw [← max_assoc, max_self]
exact max_le_max_left _ le_self_add
· rw [ne_eq, card_eq_zero, opow_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨rfl, -⟩
cases omega0_pos.not_le ha
· rwa [aleph0_le_card]
· intro b hb IH
rw [(isNormal_opow (one_lt_omega0.trans_le ha)).apply_of_isLimit hb]
apply (card_iSup_Iio_le_card_mul_iSup _).trans
rw [Cardinal.lift_id, Cardinal.mul_eq_max_of_aleph0_le_right, max_comm]
· apply max_le _ (le_max_right _ _)
apply ciSup_le'
intro c
exact (IH c.1 c.2).trans (max_le_max_left _ (card_le_card c.2.le))
· simpa using hb.pos.ne'
· refine le_ciSup_of_le ?_ ⟨1, one_lt_omega0.trans_le <| omega0_le_of_isLimit hb⟩ ?_
· exact Cardinal.bddAbove_of_small _
· simpa
theorem card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : ω ≤ b) :
(a ^ b).card ≤ max a.card b.card := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ | ha := eq_nat_or_omega0_le a
· apply (card_le_card <| opow_le_opow_left b (nat_lt_omega0 n).le).trans
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left le_rfl _).trans
simp [hb]
· exact card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha b
theorem card_opow_le (a b : Ordinal) : (a ^ b).card ≤ max ℵ₀ (max a.card b.card) := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ | ha := eq_nat_or_omega0_le a
· obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ | hb := eq_nat_or_omega0_le b
· rw [← natCast_opow, card_nat]
exact le_max_of_le_left (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le
· exact (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right _ hb).trans (le_max_right _ _)
· exact (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha _).trans (le_max_right _ _)
theorem card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (ha : ω ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) :
(a ^ b).card = max a.card b.card := by
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha b).antisymm (max_le _ _) <;> apply card_le_card
· exact left_le_opow a hb
· exact right_le_opow b (one_lt_omega0.trans_le ha)
theorem card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_right {a b : Ordinal} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : ω ≤ b) :
(a ^ b).card = max a.card b.card := by
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right a hb).antisymm (max_le _ _) <;> apply card_le_card
· exact left_le_opow a (omega0_pos.trans_le hb)
· exact right_le_opow b ha
theorem card_omega0_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : card (ω ^ a) = max ℵ₀ a.card := by
rw [card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_left le_rfl h.bot_lt, card_omega0]
theorem card_opow_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : card (a ^ ω) = max ℵ₀ a.card := by
rw [card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_right h le_rfl, card_omega0, max_comm]
theorem principal_opow_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· ^ ·) (ω_ o) := by
obtain rfl | ho := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos o
· rw [omega_zero]
exact principal_opow_omega0
· intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_omega_iff_card_lt] at ha hb ⊢
apply (card_opow_le a b).trans_lt (max_lt _ (max_lt ha hb))
rwa [← aleph_zero, aleph_lt_aleph]
theorem IsInitial.principal_opow {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· ^ ·) o := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := mem_range_omega_iff.2 ⟨ho, h⟩
exact principal_opow_omega a
theorem principal_opow_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· ^ ·) c.ord := by
apply (isInitial_ord c).principal_opow
rwa [omega0_le_ord]
/-! ### Initial ordinals are principal -/
theorem principal_add_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· + ·) c.ord := by
intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_ord, card_add] at *
exact add_lt_of_lt hc ha hb
theorem IsInitial.principal_add {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· + ·) o := by
rw [← h.ord_card]
apply principal_add_ord
rwa [aleph0_le_card]
theorem principal_add_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· + ·) (ω_ o) :=
(isInitial_omega o).principal_add (omega0_le_omega o)
theorem principal_mul_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· * ·) c.ord := by
intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_ord, card_mul] at *
exact mul_lt_of_lt hc ha hb
theorem IsInitial.principal_mul {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· * ·) o := by
rw [← h.ord_card]
apply principal_mul_ord
rwa [aleph0_le_card]
theorem principal_mul_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· * ·) (ω_ o) :=
(isInitial_omega o).principal_mul (omega0_le_omega o)
@[deprecated principal_add_omega (since := "2024-11-08")]
theorem _root_.Cardinal.principal_add_aleph (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· + ·) (ℵ_ o).ord :=
principal_add_ord <| aleph0_le_aleph o
end Ordinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean | 755 | 762 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Path
/-!
# Path connectedness
Continuing from `Mathlib.Topology.Path`, this file defines path components and path-connected
spaces.
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
## Main theorems
* `Joined` is an equivalence relation, while `JoinedIn F` is at least symmetric and transitive.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
Furthermore, it is shown that continuous images and quotients of path-connected sets/spaces are
path-connected, and that every path-connected set/space is also connected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := h.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hxy.mem
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hyz.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
theorem JoinedIn.map_continuousOn (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨γ, hγ⟩ := h
⟨γ.map' <| hf.mono (range_subset_iff.mpr hγ), fun t ↦ mem_image_of_mem _ (hγ t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.map (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
h.map_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem Topology.IsInducing.joinedIn_image {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) (hx : x ∈ F)
(hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) ↔ JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨?_, (.map · hf.continuous)⟩
rintro ⟨γ, hγ⟩
choose γ' hγ'F hγ' using hγ
have h₀ : x ⤳ γ' 0 := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.source]
have h₁ : γ' 1 ⤳ y := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.target]
have h : JoinedIn F (γ' 0) (γ' 1) := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨γ', ?_⟩, rfl, rfl⟩, hγ'F⟩
simpa only [hf.continuous_iff, comp_def, hγ'] using map_continuous γ
exact (h₀.joinedIn hx (hγ'F _)).trans <| h.trans <| h₁.joinedIn (hγ'F _) hy
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.joinedIn_image := IsInducing.joinedIn_image
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
theorem mem_pathComponent_iff : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ Joined y x := .rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
theorem pathComponent_subset_component (x : X) : pathComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
fun y h =>
(isConnected_range h.somePath.continuous).subset_connectedComponent ⟨0, by simp⟩ ⟨1, by simp⟩
/-- The path component of `x` in `F` is the set of points that can be joined to `x` in `F`. -/
def pathComponentIn (x : X) (F : Set X) :=
{ y | JoinedIn F x y }
@[simp]
theorem pathComponentIn_univ (x : X) : pathComponentIn x univ = pathComponent x := by
simp [pathComponentIn, pathComponent, JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem Joined.mem_pathComponent (hyz : Joined y z) (hxy : y ∈ pathComponent x) :
z ∈ pathComponent x :=
hxy.trans hyz
theorem mem_pathComponentIn_self (h : x ∈ F) : x ∈ pathComponentIn x F :=
JoinedIn.refl h
theorem pathComponentIn_subset : pathComponentIn x F ⊆ F :=
fun _ hy ↦ hy.target_mem
theorem pathComponentIn_nonempty_iff : (pathComponentIn x F).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨γ, hγ⟩⟩ ↦ γ.source ▸ hγ 0, fun hx ↦ ⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self hx⟩⟩
theorem pathComponentIn_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponentIn y F) :
pathComponentIn x F = pathComponentIn y F := by
ext; exact ⟨h.trans, h.symm.trans⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem pathComponentIn_mono {G : Set X} (h : F ⊆ G) :
pathComponentIn x F ⊆ pathComponentIn x G :=
fun _ ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ ⟨γ, fun t ↦ h (hγ t)⟩
/-! ### Path connected sets -/
/-- A set `F` is path connected if it contains a point that can be joined to all other in `F`. -/
def IsPathConnected (F : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ {y}, y ∈ F → JoinedIn F x y
theorem isPathConnected_iff_eq : IsPathConnected F ↔ ∃ x ∈ F, pathComponentIn x F = F := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, x_in, h⟩ <;> use x, x_in
· ext y
exact ⟨fun hy => hy.mem.2, h⟩
· intro y y_in
rwa [← h] at y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.joinedIn (h : IsPathConnected F) :
∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y := fun _x x_in _y y_in =>
let ⟨_b, _b_in, hb⟩ := h
(hb x_in).symm.trans (hb y_in)
theorem isPathConnected_iff :
IsPathConnected F ↔ F.Nonempty ∧ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨let ⟨b, b_in, _hb⟩ := h; ⟨b, b_in⟩, h.joinedIn⟩,
fun ⟨⟨b, b_in⟩, h⟩ => ⟨b, b_in, fun x_in => h _ b_in _ x_in⟩⟩
/-- If `f` is continuous on `F` and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image' (hF : IsPathConnected F)
{f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
rcases hF with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f x_in
rintro _ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(hx y_in).somePath.map' ?_, fun t ↦ ⟨_, (hx y_in).somePath_mem t, rfl⟩⟩
exact hf.mono (range_subset_iff.2 (hx y_in).somePath_mem)
/-- If `f` is continuous and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image (hF : IsPathConnected F) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (f '' F) :=
hF.image' hf.continuousOn
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, `f(F)` is path-connected iff `F` is. -/
nonrec theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
IsPathConnected F ↔ IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
simp only [IsPathConnected, forall_mem_image, exists_mem_image]
refine exists_congr fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun hx ↦ forall₂_congr fun y hy ↦ ?_
rw [hf.joinedIn_image hx hy]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPathConnected_iff := IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_image {s : Set X} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h '' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s :=
h.isInducing.isPathConnected_iff.symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h⁻¹(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s := by
rw [← Homeomorph.image_symm]; exact h.symm.isPathConnected_image
theorem IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
y ∈ pathComponent x :=
(h.joinedIn x x_in y y_in).joined
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) :
F ⊆ pathComponent x := fun _y y_in => h.mem_pathComponent x_in y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponentIn {s : Set X} (hs : IsPathConnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ pathComponentIn x F :=
fun y hys ↦ (hs.joinedIn x hxs y hys).mono hsF
theorem isPathConnected_singleton (x : X) : IsPathConnected ({x} : Set X) := by
refine ⟨x, rfl, ?_⟩
rintro y rfl
exact JoinedIn.refl rfl
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (h : x ∈ F) : IsPathConnected (pathComponentIn x F) :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self h, fun ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ by
refine ⟨γ, fun t ↦
⟨(γ.truncateOfLE t.2.1).cast (γ.extend_zero.symm) (γ.extend_extends' t).symm, fun t' ↦ ?_⟩⟩
dsimp [Path.truncateOfLE, Path.truncate]
exact γ.extend_extends' ⟨min (max t'.1 0) t.1, by simp [t.2.1, t.2.2]⟩ ▸ hγ _⟩
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponent : IsPathConnected (pathComponent x) := by
rw [← pathComponentIn_univ]
exact isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (mem_univ x)
theorem IsPathConnected.union {U V : Set X} (hU : IsPathConnected U) (hV : IsPathConnected V)
(hUV : (U ∩ V).Nonempty) : IsPathConnected (U ∪ V) := by
rcases hUV with ⟨x, xU, xV⟩
use x, Or.inl xU
rintro y (yU | yV)
· exact (hU.joinedIn x xU y yU).mono subset_union_left
· exact (hV.joinedIn x xV y yV).mono subset_union_right
/-- If a set `W` is path-connected, then it is also path-connected when seen as a set in a smaller
ambient type `U` (when `U` contains `W`). -/
theorem IsPathConnected.preimage_coe {U W : Set X} (hW : IsPathConnected W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) :
IsPathConnected (((↑) : U → X) ⁻¹' W) := by
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_val, inter_eq_right.2 hWU]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), range γ ⊆ s ∧ ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
let p' : ℕ → X := fun k => if h : k < n + 1 then p ⟨k, h⟩ else p ⟨0, n.zero_lt_succ⟩
| obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ : ∃ γ : Path (p' 0) (p' n), (∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ range γ) ∧ range γ ⊆ s := by
have hp' : ∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ s := by
intro i hi
simp [p', Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi, hp]
clear_value p'
clear hp p
induction n with
| zero =>
use Path.refl (p' 0)
constructor
· rintro i hi
rw [Nat.le_zero.mp hi]
exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rw [range_subset_iff]
rintro _x
exact hp' 0 le_rfl
| succ n hn =>
rcases hn fun i hi => hp' i <| Nat.le_succ_of_le hi with ⟨γ₀, hγ₀⟩
rcases h.joinedIn (p' n) (hp' n n.le_succ) (p' <| n + 1) (hp' (n + 1) <| le_rfl) with
⟨γ₁, hγ₁⟩
let γ : Path (p' 0) (p' <| n + 1) := γ₀.trans γ₁
use γ
have range_eq : range γ = range γ₀ ∪ range γ₁ := γ₀.trans_range γ₁
constructor
· rintro i hi
by_cases hi' : i ≤ n
· rw [range_eq]
left
exact hγ₀.1 i hi'
· rw [not_le, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at hi'
have : i = n.succ := le_antisymm hi hi'
rw [this]
use 1
exact γ.target
· rw [range_eq]
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 365 | 399 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Unions of finite sets
This file defines the union of a family `t : α → Finset β` of finsets bounded by a finset
`s : Finset α`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.disjUnion`: Given a hypothesis `h` which states that finsets `s` and `t` are disjoint,
`s.disjUnion t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`; this does
not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.biUnion`: Finite unions of finsets; given an indexing function `f : α → Finset β` and an
`s : Finset α`, `s.biUnion f` is the union of all finsets of the form `f a` for `a ∈ s`.
## TODO
Remove `Finset.biUnion` in favour of `Finset.sup`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero MulAction
variable {α β γ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {t t₁ t₂ : α → Finset β}
namespace Finset
section DisjiUnion
/-- `disjiUnion s f h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjiUnion s f` iff `a ∈ f i` for some `i ∈ s`.
It is the same as `s.biUnion f`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The
hypothesis ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (hf : (s : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint t) : Finset β :=
⟨s.val.bind (Finset.val ∘ t), Multiset.nodup_bind.2
⟨fun a _ ↦ (t a).nodup, s.nodup.pairwise fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦ disjoint_val.2 <| hf ha hb hab⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).1 = s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_empty (t : α → Finset β) : disjiUnion ∅ t (by simp) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_disjiUnion {b : β} {h} : b ∈ s.disjiUnion t h ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, disjiUnion_val, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_disjiUnion {h} : (s.disjiUnion t h : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_disjiUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (f : α → Finset β) (H) :
disjiUnion (cons a s ha) f H =
(f a).disjUnion ((s.disjiUnion f) fun _ hb _ hc ↦ H (mem_cons_of_mem hb) (mem_cons_of_mem hc))
(disjoint_left.2 fun _ hb h ↦
let ⟨_, hc, h⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp h
disjoint_left.mp
(H (mem_cons_self a s) (mem_cons_of_mem hc) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc ha).symm) hb h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.cons_bind _ _ _
@[simp] lemma singleton_disjiUnion (a : α) {h} : Finset.disjiUnion {a} t h = t a :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_bind _ _
lemma disjiUnion_disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (g : β → Finset γ) (h1 h2) :
(s.disjiUnion f h1).disjiUnion g h2 =
s.attach.disjiUnion
(fun a ↦ ((f a).disjiUnion g) fun _ hb _ hc ↦
h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hb⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hc⟩))
fun a _ b _ hab ↦
disjoint_left.mpr fun x hxa hxb ↦ by
obtain ⟨xa, hfa, hga⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxa
obtain ⟨xb, hfb, hgb⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxb
refine disjoint_left.mp
(h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hfa⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, b.prop, hfb⟩) ?_) hga
hgb
rintro rfl
exact disjoint_left.mp (h1 a.prop b.prop <| Subtype.coe_injective.ne hab) hfa hfb :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_assoc.trans (Multiset.attach_bind_coe _ _).symm
lemma sUnion_disjiUnion {f : α → Finset (Set β)} (I : Finset α)
(hf : (I : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint f) :
⋃₀ (I.disjiUnion f hf : Set (Set β)) = ⋃ a ∈ I, ⋃₀ ↑(f a) := by
ext
simp only [coe_disjiUnion, Set.mem_sUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, exists_prop]
tauto
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β}
private lemma pairwiseDisjoint_fibers : Set.PairwiseDisjoint ↑t fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a) :=
fun x' hx y' hy hne ↦ by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]; rintro i ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, rfl⟩; exact hne rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_filter_eq (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α → β) :
t.disjiUnion (fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a)) pairwiseDisjoint_fibers =
s.filter fun c ↦ f c ∈ t :=
ext fun b => by simpa using and_comm
lemma disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) :
t.disjiUnion (fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a)) pairwiseDisjoint_fibers = s := by
simpa [filter_eq_self]
end DecidableEq
theorem map_disjiUnion {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {t : β → Finset γ} {h} :
(s.map f).disjiUnion t h =
s.disjiUnion (fun a => t (f a)) fun _ ha _ hb hab =>
h (mem_map_of_mem _ ha) (mem_map_of_mem _ hb) (f.injective.ne hab) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_map _ _ _
theorem disjiUnion_map {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β} {f : β ↪ γ} {h} :
(s.disjiUnion t h).map f =
s.disjiUnion (fun a => (t a).map f) (h.mono' fun _ _ ↦ (disjoint_map _).2) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_bind _ _ _
variable {f : α → β} {op : β → β → β} [hc : Std.Commutative op] [ha : Std.Associative op]
theorem fold_disjiUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Finset α} {b : ι → β} {b₀ : β} (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).fold op (s.fold op b₀ b) f = s.fold op b₀ fun i => (t i).fold op (b i) f :=
(congr_arg _ <| Multiset.map_bind _ _ _).trans (Multiset.fold_bind _ _ _ _ _)
end DisjiUnion
section BUnion
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `Finset.biUnion s t` is the union of `t a` over `a ∈ s`.
(This was formerly `bind` due to the monad structure on types with `DecidableEq`.) -/
protected def biUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) : Finset β :=
(s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1).toFinset
@[simp] lemma biUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).1 = (s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1).dedup := rfl
@[simp] lemma biUnion_empty : Finset.biUnion ∅ t = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_biUnion {b : β} : b ∈ s.biUnion t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, biUnion_val, Multiset.mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_biUnion : (s.biUnion t : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_biUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp]
lemma biUnion_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : (insert a s).biUnion t = t a ∪ s.biUnion t := by
aesop
lemma biUnion_congr (hs : s₁ = s₂) (ht : ∀ a ∈ s₁, t₁ a = t₂ a) :
s₁.biUnion t₁ = s₂.biUnion t₂ := by
aesop
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_eq_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (hf) :
s.disjiUnion f hf = s.biUnion f := eq_of_veq (s.disjiUnion f hf).nodup.dedup.symm
lemma biUnion_subset {s' : Finset β} : s.biUnion t ⊆ s' ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ s' := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨fun H a ha b hb ↦ H ⟨a, ha, hb⟩, fun H b ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ ↦ H a ha hb⟩
@[simp]
lemma singleton_biUnion {a : α} : Finset.biUnion {a} t = t a := by
classical rw [← insert_empty_eq, biUnion_insert, biUnion_empty, union_empty]
lemma biUnion_inter (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (t : Finset β) :
s.biUnion f ∩ t = s.biUnion fun x ↦ f x ∩ t := by
ext x
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_inter]
tauto
lemma inter_biUnion (t : Finset β) (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) :
t ∩ s.biUnion f = s.biUnion fun x ↦ t ∩ f x := by
rw [inter_comm, biUnion_inter]
simp [inter_comm]
| lemma biUnion_biUnion [DecidableEq γ] (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (g : β → Finset γ) :
(s.biUnion f).biUnion g = s.biUnion fun a ↦ (f a).biUnion g := by
ext
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
simp_rw [← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left, and_assoc]
rw [exists_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Union.lean | 181 | 186 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertIdx
/-! # Some lemmas about lists involving sets
Split out from `Data.List.Basic` to reduce its dependencies.
-/
open List
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace List
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq_empty_iff {l : List α} : { x | x ∈ l } = ∅ ↔ l = [] :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias tail_reverse_eq_reverse_dropLast := tail_reverse
theorem injOn_insertIdx_index_of_not_mem (l : List α) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ l) :
Set.InjOn (fun k => l.insertIdx k x) { n | n ≤ l.length } := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· intro n hn m hm _
simp_all [Set.mem_singleton_iff, Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton, length]
· intro n hn m hm h
simp only [length, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hn hm
simp only [mem_cons, not_or] at hx
cases n <;> cases m
· rfl
· simp [hx.left] at h
· simp [Ne.symm hx.left] at h
· simp only [true_and, eq_self_iff_true, insertIdx_succ_cons] at h
rw [Nat.succ_inj]
refine IH hx.right ?_ ?_ (by injection h)
· simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using hn
· simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using hm
theorem foldr_range_subset_of_range_subset {f : β → α → α} {g : γ → α → α}
(hfg : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) (a : α) : Set.range (foldr f a) ⊆ Set.range (foldr g a) := by
rintro _ ⟨l, rfl⟩
induction' l with b l H
· exact ⟨[], rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hgf⟩ := hfg (Set.mem_range_self b)
obtain ⟨m, hgf'⟩ := H
rw [foldr_cons, ← hgf, ← hgf']
exact ⟨c :: m, rfl⟩
theorem foldl_range_subset_of_range_subset {f : α → β → α} {g : α → γ → α}
(hfg : (Set.range fun a c => f c a) ⊆ Set.range fun b c => g c b) (a : α) :
Set.range (foldl f a) ⊆ Set.range (foldl g a) := by
change (Set.range fun l => _) ⊆ Set.range fun l => _
-- Porting note: have to write `(foldr_reverse)` instead of `foldr_reverse`.
simp_rw [← (foldr_reverse), Set.range_comp' _ reverse,
reverse_involutive.bijective.surjective.range_eq, Set.image_univ]
exact foldr_range_subset_of_range_subset hfg a
theorem foldr_range_eq_of_range_eq {f : β → α → α} {g : γ → α → α} (hfg : Set.range f = Set.range g)
(a : α) : Set.range (foldr f a) = Set.range (foldr g a) :=
(foldr_range_subset_of_range_subset hfg.le a).antisymm
(foldr_range_subset_of_range_subset hfg.ge a)
theorem foldl_range_eq_of_range_eq {f : α → β → α} {g : α → γ → α}
(hfg : (Set.range fun a c => f c a) = Set.range fun b c => g c b) (a : α) :
Set.range (foldl f a) = Set.range (foldl g a) :=
(foldl_range_subset_of_range_subset hfg.le a).antisymm
(foldl_range_subset_of_range_subset hfg.ge a)
/-!
### MapAccumr and Foldr
Some lemmas relation `mapAccumr` and `foldr`
-/
section MapAccumr
theorem mapAccumr_eq_foldr {σ : Type*} (f : α → σ → σ × β) : ∀ (as : List α) (s : σ),
mapAccumr f as s = List.foldr (fun a s =>
let r := f a s.1
(r.1, r.2 :: s.2)
) (s, []) as
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: as, s => by
simp only [mapAccumr, foldr, mapAccumr_eq_foldr f as]
|
theorem mapAccumr₂_eq_foldr {σ φ : Type*} (f : α → β → σ → σ × φ) :
∀ (as : List α) (bs : List β) (s : σ),
mapAccumr₂ f as bs s = foldr (fun ab s =>
let r := f ab.1 ab.2 s.1
(r.1, r.2 :: s.2)
) (s, []) (as.zip bs)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 90 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file defines bundled ordered groups and develops a few basic results.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
/-
`NeZero` theory should not be needed at this point in the ordered algebraic hierarchy.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive IsOrderedAddMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) IsOrderedMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelMonoid
[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] : IsOrderedCancelMonoid α where
le_of_mul_le_mul_left a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
le_of_mul_le_mul_right a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
/-!
### Linearly ordered commutative groups
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative group is an
additive commutative group with a linear order in which
addition is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedAddCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group is a
commutative group with a linear order in which
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
attribute [nolint docBlame]
LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrder LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.toLinearOrder
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left]
theorem LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' (a b : α) (h : a < b) (c : α) : c * a < c * b :=
_root_.mul_lt_mul_left' h c
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_neg_eq]
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq' (h : a⁻¹ = a) : a = 1 :=
match lt_trichotomy a 1 with
| Or.inl h₁ =>
have : 1 < a := h ▸ one_lt_inv_of_inv h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
| Or.inr (Or.inl h₁) => h₁
| Or.inr (Or.inr h₁) =>
have : a < 1 := h ▸ inv_lt_one'.mpr h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
@[to_additive exists_zero_lt]
theorem exists_one_lt' [Nontrivial α] : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Decidable.exists_ne (1 : α)
obtain h|h := hy.lt_or_lt
· exact ⟨y⁻¹, one_lt_inv'.mpr h⟩
· exact ⟨y, h⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMaxOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a * y, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' a hy⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMinOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a / y, (div_lt_self_iff a).mpr hy⟩⟩
| @[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [inv_le_iff_one_le_mul']
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 138 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
/-!
# e-transforms
e-transforms are a family of transformations of pairs of finite sets that aim to reduce the size
of the sumset while keeping some invariant the same. This file defines a few of them, to be used
as internals of other proofs.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.mulDysonETransform`: The Dyson e-transform. Replaces `(s, t)` by
`(s ∪ e • t, t ∩ e⁻¹ • s)`. The additive version preserves `|s ∩ [1, m]| + |t ∩ [1, m - e]|`.
* `Finset.mulETransformLeft`/`Finset.mulETransformRight`: Replace `(s, t)` by
`(s ∩ s • e, t ∪ e⁻¹ • t)` and `(s ∪ s • e, t ∩ e⁻¹ • t)`. Preserve (together) the sum of
the cardinalities (see `Finset.MulETransform.card`). In particular, one of the two transforms
increases the sum of the cardinalities and the other one decreases it. See
`le_or_lt_of_add_le_add` and around.
## TODO
Prove the invariance property of the Dyson e-transform.
-/
open MulOpposite
open Pointwise
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
namespace Finset
/-! ### Dyson e-transform -/
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] (e : α) (x : Finset α × Finset α)
/-- The **Dyson e-transform**. Turns `(s, t)` into `(s ∪ e • t, t ∩ e⁻¹ • s)`. This reduces the
product of the two sets. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The **Dyson e-transform**.
Turns `(s, t)` into `(s ∪ e +ᵥ t, t ∩ -e +ᵥ s)`. This reduces the sum of the two sets."]
def mulDysonETransform : Finset α × Finset α :=
(x.1 ∪ e • x.2, x.2 ∩ e⁻¹ • x.1)
@[to_additive]
theorem mulDysonETransform.subset :
(mulDysonETransform e x).1 * (mulDysonETransform e x).2 ⊆ x.1 * x.2 := by
refine union_mul_inter_subset_union.trans (union_subset Subset.rfl ?_)
rw [mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc, inv_smul_smul, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulDysonETransform.card :
(mulDysonETransform e x).1.card + (mulDysonETransform e x).2.card = x.1.card + x.2.card := by
dsimp
rw [← card_smul_finset e (_ ∩ _), smul_finset_inter, smul_inv_smul, inter_comm,
card_union_add_card_inter, card_smul_finset]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulDysonETransform_idem :
mulDysonETransform e (mulDysonETransform e x) = mulDysonETransform e x := by
ext : 1 <;> dsimp
· rw [smul_finset_inter, smul_inv_smul, inter_comm, union_eq_left]
exact inter_subset_union
· rw [smul_finset_union, inv_smul_smul, union_comm, inter_eq_left]
exact inter_subset_union
variable {e x}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulDysonETransform.smul_finset_snd_subset_fst :
e • (mulDysonETransform e x).2 ⊆ (mulDysonETransform e x).1 := by
dsimp
rw [smul_finset_inter, smul_inv_smul, inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_union
end CommGroup
/-!
### Two unnamed e-transforms
The following two transforms both reduce the product/sum of the two sets. Further, one of them must
decrease the sum of the size of the sets (and then the other increases it).
This pair of transforms doesn't seem to be named in the literature. It is used by Sanders in his
bound on Roth numbers, and by DeVos in his proof of Cauchy-Davenport.
-/
section Group
variable [Group α] (e : α) (x : Finset α × Finset α)
/-- An **e-transform**. Turns `(s, t)` into `(s ∩ s • e, t ∪ e⁻¹ • t)`. This reduces the
product of the two sets. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "An **e-transform**.
Turns `(s, t)` into `(s ∩ s +ᵥ e, t ∪ -e +ᵥ t)`. This reduces the sum of the two sets."]
def mulETransformLeft : Finset α × Finset α :=
(x.1 ∩ op e • x.1, x.2 ∪ e⁻¹ • x.2)
/-- An **e-transform**. Turns `(s, t)` into `(s ∪ s • e, t ∩ e⁻¹ • t)`. This reduces the
product of the two sets. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "An **e-transform**.
Turns `(s, t)` into `(s ∪ s +ᵥ e, t ∩ -e +ᵥ t)`. This reduces the sum of the two sets."]
def mulETransformRight : Finset α × Finset α :=
(x.1 ∪ op e • x.1, x.2 ∩ e⁻¹ • x.2)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulETransformLeft_one : mulETransformLeft 1 x = x := by simp [mulETransformLeft]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulETransformRight_one : mulETransformRight 1 x = x := by simp [mulETransformRight]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulETransformLeft.fst_mul_snd_subset :
(mulETransformLeft e x).1 * (mulETransformLeft e x).2 ⊆ x.1 * x.2 := by
refine inter_mul_union_subset_union.trans (union_subset Subset.rfl ?_)
rw [op_smul_finset_mul_eq_mul_smul_finset, smul_inv_smul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulETransformRight.fst_mul_snd_subset :
(mulETransformRight e x).1 * (mulETransformRight e x).2 ⊆ x.1 * x.2 := by
refine union_mul_inter_subset_union.trans (union_subset Subset.rfl ?_)
rw [op_smul_finset_mul_eq_mul_smul_finset, smul_inv_smul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulETransformLeft.card :
(mulETransformLeft e x).1.card + (mulETransformRight e x).1.card = 2 * x.1.card :=
(card_inter_add_card_union _ _).trans <| by rw [card_smul_finset, two_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulETransformRight.card :
(mulETransformLeft e x).2.card + (mulETransformRight e x).2.card = 2 * x.2.card :=
(card_union_add_card_inter _ _).trans <| by rw [card_smul_finset, two_mul]
/-- This statement is meant to be combined with `le_or_lt_of_add_le_add` and similar lemmas. -/
@[to_additive AddETransform.card "This statement is meant to be combined with
`le_or_lt_of_add_le_add` and similar lemmas."]
protected theorem MulETransform.card :
(mulETransformLeft e x).1.card + (mulETransformLeft e x).2.card +
((mulETransformRight e x).1.card + (mulETransformRight e x).2.card) =
| x.1.card + x.2.card + (x.1.card + x.2.card) := by
rw [add_add_add_comm, mulETransformLeft.card, mulETransformRight.card, ← mul_add, two_mul]
end Group
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/ETransform.lean | 150 | 153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow₀ one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
rcases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h | h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
theorem quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five :
letI c := cos (π / 5)
4 * c ^ 2 - 2 * c - 1 = 0 := by
set θ := π / 5 with hθ
set c := cos θ
set s := sin θ
suffices 2 * c = 4 * c ^ 2 - 1 by simp [this]
have hs : s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, sin_eq_zero_iff, hθ]
push_neg
intro n hn
replace hn : n * 5 = 1 := by field_simp [mul_comm _ π, mul_assoc] at hn; norm_cast at hn
omega
suffices s * (2 * c) = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) from mul_left_cancel₀ hs this
calc s * (2 * c) = 2 * s * c := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm 2]
_ = sin (2 * θ) := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = sin (π - 2 * θ) := by rw [sin_pi_sub]
_ = sin (2 * θ + θ) := by congr; field_simp [hθ]; linarith
_ = sin (2 * θ) * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := sin_add (2 * θ) θ
_ = 2 * s * c * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = 2 * s * c * c + (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) * s := by rw [cos_two_mul]
_ = s * (2 * c * c) + s * (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
_ = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
open Polynomial in
theorem Polynomial.isRoot_cos_pi_div_five :
(4 • X ^ 2 - 2 • X - C 1 : ℝ[X]).IsRoot (cos (π / 5)) := by
simpa using quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
/-- The cosine of `π / 5` is `(1 + √5) / 4`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_five : cos (π / 5) = (1 + √5) / 4 := by
set c := cos (π / 5)
have : 4 * (c * c) + (-2) * c + (-1) = 0 := by
rw [← sq, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
have hd : discrim 4 (-2) (-1) = (2 * √5) * (2 * √5) := by norm_num [discrim, mul_mul_mul_comm]
rcases (quadratic_eq_zero_iff (by norm_num) hd c).mp this with h | h
· field_simp [h]; linarith
· absurd (show 0 ≤ c from cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos.le])
rw [not_le, h]
exact div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (by norm_num [lt_sqrt]) (by positivity)
end CosDivSq
/-- `Real.sin` as an `OrderIso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sinOrderIso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.orderIso _ _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ bijOn_sin.image_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : (sinOrderIso x : ℝ) = sin x :=
rfl
theorem sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : sinOrderIso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four]
have h : √2 / 2 > 0 := by positivity
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_six : tan (π / 6) = 1 / sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_six, cos_pi_div_six]
ring
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_three : tan (π / 3) = sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_three, cos_pi_div_three]
ring
theorem tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith)) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
theorem tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| Or.inl hx0, Or.inl hxp => le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| Or.inl _, Or.inr hxp => by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| Or.inr hx0, _ => by simp [hx0.symm]
theorem tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
theorem tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
theorem strictMonoOn_tan : StrictMonoOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
rintro x hx y hy hlt
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos,
div_lt_div_iff₀ (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hy), mul_comm, ← sub_pos, ← sin_sub]
exact sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (sub_pos.2 hlt) <| by linarith [hx.1, hy.2]
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
strictMonoOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂ hxy
theorem injOn_tan : InjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_tan.injOn
theorem tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
injOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan π := by
simpa only [Function.Periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi : tan π = 0 := by rw [tan_periodic.eq, tan_zero]
theorem tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
theorem tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem tan_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π / 2 - x) = (tan x)⁻¹ := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos, inv_div, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) atTop := by
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_pos zero_lt_one
tendsto_sin_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
theorem tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto using 2
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) atBot := by
convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end Real
namespace Complex
open Real
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc
cos (π / 2) = Real.cos (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_cos]; simp
_ = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc
sin (π / 2) = Real.sin (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_sin]; simp
_ = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin, Real.sin_pi]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by rw [← ofReal_cos, Real.cos_pi]; simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
|
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 1,093 | 1,095 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Bound
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Equitabilise
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Uniform
/-!
# Chunk of the increment partition for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
In the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma, we need to partition each part of a starting partition
to increase the energy. This file defines those partitions of parts and shows that they locally
increase the energy.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.chunk`: The partition of a part of the starting partition.
* `SzemerediRegularity.edgeDensity_chunk_uniform`: `chunk` does not locally decrease the edge
density between uniform parts too much.
* `SzemerediRegularity.edgeDensity_chunk_not_uniform`: `chunk` locally increases the edge density
between non-uniform parts.
## TODO
Once ported to mathlib4, this file will be a great golfing ground for Heather's new tactic
`gcongr`.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finpartition Finset Fintype Rel Nat
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
(hP : P.IsEquipartition) (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (ε : ℝ) {U : Finset α}
(hU : U ∈ P.parts) (V : Finset α)
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound #P.parts : ℕ)
/-!
### Definitions
We define `chunk`, the partition of a part, and `star`, the sets of parts of `chunk` that are
contained in the corresponding witness of non-uniformity.
-/
/-- The portion of `SzemerediRegularity.increment` which partitions `U`. -/
noncomputable def chunk : Finpartition U :=
if hUcard : #U = m * 4 ^ #P.parts + (card α / #P.parts - m * 4 ^ #P.parts) then
(atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).equitabilise <| card_aux₁ hUcard
else (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).equitabilise <| card_aux₂ hP hU hUcard
-- `hP` and `hU` are used to get that `U` has size
-- `m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a or m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a + 1`
/-- The portion of `SzemerediRegularity.chunk` which is contained in the witness of non-uniformity
of `U` and `V`. -/
noncomputable def star (V : Finset α) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V}
/-!
### Density estimates
We estimate the density between parts of `chunk`.
-/
theorem biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness :
(star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V :=
biUnion_subset_iff_forall_subset.2 fun _ hA => (mem_filter.1 hA).2
variable {hP G ε hU V} {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α}
theorem star_subset_chunk : star hP G ε hU V ⊆ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts :=
filter_subset _ _
private theorem card_nonuniformWitness_sdiff_biUnion_star (hV : V ∈ P.parts) (hUV : U ≠ V)
(h₂ : ¬G.IsUniform ε U V) :
#(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V \ (star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) ≤ 2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * m := by
have hX : G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∈ P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U :=
nonuniformWitness_mem_nonuniformWitnesses h₂ hV hUV
have q : G.nonuniformWitness ε U V \ (star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id ⊆
| {B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts |
B ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∧ B.Nonempty}.biUnion
fun B => B \ {A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ B}.biUnion id := by
intro x hx
rw [← biUnion_filter_atomise hX (G.nonuniformWitness_subset h₂), star, mem_sdiff,
mem_biUnion] at hx
simp only [not_exists, mem_biUnion, and_imp, exists_prop, mem_filter,
not_and, mem_sdiff, id, mem_sdiff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨B, hB₁, hB₂⟩, hx⟩ := hx
exact ⟨B, hB₁, hB₂, fun A hA AB => hx A hA <| AB.trans hB₁.2.1⟩
apply (card_le_card q).trans (card_biUnion_le.trans _)
trans ∑ B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts with
B ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∧ B.Nonempty, m
· suffices ∀ B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts,
#(B \ {A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ B}.biUnion id) ≤ m by
exact sum_le_sum fun B hB => this B <| filter_subset _ _ hB
intro B hB
unfold chunk
split_ifs with h₁
· convert card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le _ (card_aux₁ h₁) hB
· convert card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le _ (card_aux₂ hP hU h₁) hB
rw [sum_const]
refine mul_le_mul_right' ?_ _
have t := card_filter_atomise_le_two_pow (s := U) hX
refine t.trans (pow_right_mono₀ (by norm_num) <| tsub_le_tsub_right ?_ _)
exact card_image_le.trans (card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _)
private theorem one_sub_eps_mul_card_nonuniformWitness_le_card_star (hV : V ∈ P.parts)
(hUV : U ≠ V) (hunif : ¬G.IsUniform ε U V) (hPε : ↑100 ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5)
(hε₁ : ε ≤ 1) :
(1 - ε / 10) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) ≤ #((star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) := by
have hP₁ : 0 < #P.parts := Finset.card_pos.2 ⟨_, hU⟩
have : (↑2 ^ #P.parts : ℝ) * m / (#U * ε) ≤ ε / 10 := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Chunk.lean | 92 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.LocPathConnected
/-!
# Charted spaces
A smooth manifold is a topological space `M` locally modelled on a euclidean space (or a euclidean
half-space for manifolds with boundaries, or an infinite dimensional vector space for more general
notions of manifolds), i.e., the manifold is covered by open subsets on which there are local
homeomorphisms (the charts) going to a model space `H`, and the changes of charts should be smooth
maps.
In this file, we introduce a general framework describing these notions, where the model space is an
arbitrary topological space. We avoid the word *manifold*, which should be reserved for the
situation where the model space is a (subset of a) vector space, and use the terminology
*charted space* instead.
If the changes of charts satisfy some additional property (for instance if they are smooth), then
`M` inherits additional structure (it makes sense to talk about smooth manifolds). There are
therefore two different ingredients in a charted space:
* the set of charts, which is data
* the fact that changes of charts belong to some group (in fact groupoid), which is additional Prop.
We separate these two parts in the definition: the charted space structure is just the set of
charts, and then the different smoothness requirements (smooth manifold, orientable manifold,
contact manifold, and so on) are additional properties of these charts. These properties are
formalized through the notion of structure groupoid, i.e., a set of partial homeomorphisms stable
under composition and inverse, to which the change of coordinates should belong.
## Main definitions
* `StructureGroupoid H` : a subset of partial homeomorphisms of `H` stable under composition,
inverse and restriction (ex: partial diffeomorphisms).
* `continuousGroupoid H` : the groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms of `H`.
* `ChartedSpace H M` : charted space structure on `M` modelled on `H`, given by an atlas of
partial homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` whose sources cover `M`. This is a type class.
* `HasGroupoid M G` : when `G` is a structure groupoid on `H` and `M` is a charted space
modelled on `H`, require that all coordinate changes belong to `G`. This is a type class.
* `atlas H M` : when `M` is a charted space modelled on `H`, the atlas of this charted
space structure, i.e., the set of charts.
* `G.maximalAtlas M` : when `M` is a charted space modelled on `H` and admitting `G` as a
structure groupoid, one can consider all the partial homeomorphisms from `M` to `H` such that
changing coordinate from any chart to them belongs to `G`. This is a larger atlas, called the
maximal atlas (for the groupoid `G`).
* `Structomorph G M M'` : the type of diffeomorphisms between the charted spaces `M` and `M'` for
the groupoid `G`. We avoid the word diffeomorphism, keeping it for the smooth category.
As a basic example, we give the instance
`instance chartedSpaceSelf (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : ChartedSpace H H`
saying that a topological space is a charted space over itself, with the identity as unique chart.
This charted space structure is compatible with any groupoid.
Additional useful definitions:
* `Pregroupoid H` : a subset of partial maps of `H` stable under composition and
restriction, but not inverse (ex: smooth maps)
* `Pregroupoid.groupoid` : construct a groupoid from a pregroupoid, by requiring that a map and
its inverse both belong to the pregroupoid (ex: construct diffeos from smooth maps)
* `chartAt H x` is a preferred chart at `x : M` when `M` has a charted space structure modelled on
`H`.
* `G.compatible he he'` states that, for any two charts `e` and `e'` in the atlas, the composition
of `e.symm` and `e'` belongs to the groupoid `G` when `M` admits `G` as a structure groupoid.
* `G.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'` states that, for any two charts `e` and `e'` in the
maximal atlas associated to the groupoid `G`, the composition of `e.symm` and `e'` belongs to the
`G` if `M` admits `G` as a structure groupoid.
* `ChartedSpaceCore.toChartedSpace`: consider a space without a topology, but endowed with a set
of charts (which are partial equivs) for which the change of coordinates are partial homeos.
Then one can construct a topology on the space for which the charts become partial homeos,
defining a genuine charted space structure.
## Implementation notes
The atlas in a charted space is *not* a maximal atlas in general: the notion of maximality depends
on the groupoid one considers, and changing groupoids changes the maximal atlas. With the current
formalization, it makes sense first to choose the atlas, and then to ask whether this precise atlas
defines a smooth manifold, an orientable manifold, and so on. A consequence is that structomorphisms
between `M` and `M'` do *not* induce a bijection between the atlases of `M` and `M'`: the
definition is only that, read in charts, the structomorphism locally belongs to the groupoid under
consideration. (This is equivalent to inducing a bijection between elements of the maximal atlas).
A consequence is that the invariance under structomorphisms of properties defined in terms of the
atlas is not obvious in general, and could require some work in theory (amounting to the fact
that these properties only depend on the maximal atlas, for instance). In practice, this does not
create any real difficulty.
We use the letter `H` for the model space thinking of the case of manifolds with boundary, where the
model space is a half space.
Manifolds are sometimes defined as topological spaces with an atlas of local diffeomorphisms, and
sometimes as spaces with an atlas from which a topology is deduced. We use the former approach:
otherwise, there would be an instance from manifolds to topological spaces, which means that any
instance search for topological spaces would try to find manifold structures involving a yet
unknown model space, leading to problems. However, we also introduce the latter approach,
through a structure `ChartedSpaceCore` making it possible to construct a topology out of a set of
partial equivs with compatibility conditions (but we do not register it as an instance).
In the definition of a charted space, the model space is written as an explicit parameter as there
can be several model spaces for a given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold
(modelled over `ℂ^n`) will also be seen sometimes as a real manifold modelled over `ℝ^(2n)`.
## Notations
In the locale `Manifold`, we denote the composition of partial homeomorphisms with `≫ₕ`, and the
composition of partial equivs with `≫`.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace Topology
universe u
variable {H : Type u} {H' : Type*} {M : Type*} {M' : Type*} {M'' : Type*}
/- Notational shortcut for the composition of partial homeomorphisms and partial equivs, i.e.,
`PartialHomeomorph.trans` and `PartialEquiv.trans`.
Note that, as is usual for equivs, the composition is from left to right, hence the direction of
the arrow. -/
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] infixr:100 " ≫ₕ " => PartialHomeomorph.trans
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] infixr:100 " ≫ " => PartialEquiv.trans
open Set PartialHomeomorph Manifold -- Porting note: Added `Manifold`
/-! ### Structure groupoids -/
section Groupoid
/-! One could add to the definition of a structure groupoid the fact that the restriction of an
element of the groupoid to any open set still belongs to the groupoid.
(This is in Kobayashi-Nomizu.)
I am not sure I want this, for instance on `H × E` where `E` is a vector space, and the groupoid is
made of functions respecting the fibers and linear in the fibers (so that a charted space over this
groupoid is naturally a vector bundle) I prefer that the members of the groupoid are always
defined on sets of the form `s × E`. There is a typeclass `ClosedUnderRestriction` for groupoids
which have the restriction property.
The only nontrivial requirement is locality: if a partial homeomorphism belongs to the groupoid
around each point in its domain of definition, then it belongs to the groupoid. Without this
requirement, the composition of structomorphisms does not have to be a structomorphism. Note that
this implies that a partial homeomorphism with empty source belongs to any structure groupoid, as
it trivially satisfies this condition.
There is also a technical point, related to the fact that a partial homeomorphism is by definition a
global map which is a homeomorphism when restricted to its source subset (and its values outside
of the source are not relevant). Therefore, we also require that being a member of the groupoid only
depends on the values on the source.
We use primes in the structure names as we will reformulate them below (without primes) using a
`Membership` instance, writing `e ∈ G` instead of `e ∈ G.members`.
-/
/-- A structure groupoid is a set of partial homeomorphisms of a topological space stable under
composition and inverse. They appear in the definition of the smoothness class of a manifold. -/
structure StructureGroupoid (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] where
/-- Members of the structure groupoid are partial homeomorphisms. -/
members : Set (PartialHomeomorph H H)
/-- Structure groupoids are stable under composition. -/
trans' : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ∈ members → e ≫ₕ e' ∈ members
/-- Structure groupoids are stable under inverse. -/
symm' : ∀ e : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e.symm ∈ members
/-- The identity morphism lies in the structure groupoid. -/
id_mem' : PartialHomeomorph.refl H ∈ members
/-- Let `e` be a partial homeomorphism. If for every `x ∈ e.source`, the restriction of e to some
open set around `x` lies in the groupoid, then `e` lies in the groupoid. -/
locality' : ∀ e : PartialHomeomorph H H,
(∀ x ∈ e.source, ∃ s, IsOpen s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ members) → e ∈ members
/-- Membership in a structure groupoid respects the equivalence of partial homeomorphisms. -/
mem_of_eqOnSource' : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ≈ e → e' ∈ members
variable [TopologicalSpace H]
instance : Membership (PartialHomeomorph H H) (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun (G : StructureGroupoid H) (e : PartialHomeomorph H H) ↦ e ∈ G.members⟩
instance (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] :
SetLike (StructureGroupoid H) (PartialHomeomorph H H) where
coe s := s.members
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr
instance : Min (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun G G' => StructureGroupoid.mk
(members := G.members ∩ G'.members)
(trans' := fun e e' he he' =>
⟨G.trans' e e' he.left he'.left, G'.trans' e e' he.right he'.right⟩)
(symm' := fun e he => ⟨G.symm' e he.left, G'.symm' e he.right⟩)
(id_mem' := ⟨G.id_mem', G'.id_mem'⟩)
(locality' := by
intro e hx
apply (mem_inter_iff e G.members G'.members).mpr
refine And.intro (G.locality' e ?_) (G'.locality' e ?_)
all_goals
intro x hex
rcases hx x hex with ⟨s, hs⟩
use s
refine And.intro hs.left (And.intro hs.right.left ?_)
· exact hs.right.right.left
· exact hs.right.right.right)
(mem_of_eqOnSource' := fun e e' he hee' =>
⟨G.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he.left hee', G'.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he.right hee'⟩)⟩
instance : InfSet (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun S => StructureGroupoid.mk
(members := ⋂ s ∈ S, s.members)
(trans' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e e' he he' i hi
exact i.trans' e e' (he i hi) (he' i hi))
(symm' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e he i hi
exact i.symm' e (he i hi))
(id_mem' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro i _
exact i.id_mem')
(locality' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e he i hi
refine i.locality' e ?_
intro x hex
rcases he x hex with ⟨s, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨hs.left, ⟨hs.right.left, hs.right.right i hi⟩⟩⟩)
(mem_of_eqOnSource' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e e' he he'e
exact fun i hi => i.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' (he i hi) he'e)⟩
theorem StructureGroupoid.trans (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (he' : e' ∈ G) : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
G.trans' e e' he he'
theorem StructureGroupoid.symm (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) :
e.symm ∈ G :=
G.symm' e he
theorem StructureGroupoid.id_mem (G : StructureGroupoid H) : PartialHomeomorph.refl H ∈ G :=
G.id_mem'
theorem StructureGroupoid.locality (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(h : ∀ x ∈ e.source, ∃ s, IsOpen s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ G) : e ∈ G :=
G.locality' e h
theorem StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (h : e' ≈ e) : e' ∈ G :=
G.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he h
theorem StructureGroupoid.mem_iff_of_eqOnSource {G : StructureGroupoid H}
{e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H} (h : e ≈ e') : e ∈ G ↔ e' ∈ G :=
⟨fun he ↦ G.mem_of_eqOnSource he (Setoid.symm h), fun he' ↦ G.mem_of_eqOnSource he' h⟩
/-- Partial order on the set of groupoids, given by inclusion of the members of the groupoid. -/
instance StructureGroupoid.partialOrder : PartialOrder (StructureGroupoid H) :=
PartialOrder.lift StructureGroupoid.members fun a b h ↦ by
cases a
cases b
dsimp at h
induction h
rfl
theorem StructureGroupoid.le_iff {G₁ G₂ : StructureGroupoid H} : G₁ ≤ G₂ ↔ ∀ e, e ∈ G₁ → e ∈ G₂ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The trivial groupoid, containing only the identity (and maps with empty source, as this is
necessary from the definition). -/
def idGroupoid (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] : StructureGroupoid H where
members := {PartialHomeomorph.refl H} ∪ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ }
trans' e e' he he' := by
rcases he with he | he
· simpa only [mem_singleton_iff.1 he, refl_trans]
· have : (e ≫ₕ e').source ⊆ e.source := sep_subset _ _
rw [he] at this
have : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ } := eq_bot_iff.2 this
exact (mem_union _ _ _).2 (Or.inr this)
symm' e he := by
rcases (mem_union _ _ _).1 he with E | E
· simp [mem_singleton_iff.mp E]
· right
simpa only [e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target.symm, mfld_simps] using E
id_mem' := mem_union_left _ rfl
locality' e he := by
rcases e.source.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· right
exact h
· left
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases he x hx with ⟨s, open_s, xs, hs⟩
have x's : x ∈ (e.restr s).source := by
rw [restr_source, open_s.interior_eq]
exact ⟨hx, xs⟩
rcases hs with hs | hs
· replace hs : PartialHomeomorph.restr e s = PartialHomeomorph.refl H := by
simpa only using hs
have : (e.restr s).source = univ := by
rw [hs]
simp
have : e.toPartialEquiv.source ∩ interior s = univ := this
have : univ ⊆ interior s := by
rw [← this]
exact inter_subset_right
have : s = univ := by rwa [open_s.interior_eq, univ_subset_iff] at this
simpa only [this, restr_univ] using hs
· exfalso
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hs
rwa [hs] at x's
mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he he'e := by
rcases he with he | he
· left
have : e = e' := by
refine eq_of_eqOnSource_univ (Setoid.symm he'e) ?_ ?_ <;>
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 he] <;> rfl
rwa [← this]
· right
have he : e.toPartialEquiv.source = ∅ := he
rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, EqOnSource.source_eq he'e]
/-- Every structure groupoid contains the identity groupoid. -/
instance instStructureGroupoidOrderBot : OrderBot (StructureGroupoid H) where
bot := idGroupoid H
bot_le := by
intro u f hf
have hf : f ∈ {PartialHomeomorph.refl H} ∪ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ } := hf
simp only [singleton_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_insert_iff] at hf
rcases hf with hf | hf
· rw [hf]
apply u.id_mem
· apply u.locality
intro x hx
rw [hf, mem_empty_iff_false] at hx
exact hx.elim
instance : Inhabited (StructureGroupoid H) := ⟨idGroupoid H⟩
/-- To construct a groupoid, one may consider classes of partial homeomorphisms such that
both the function and its inverse have some property. If this property is stable under composition,
one gets a groupoid. `Pregroupoid` bundles the properties needed for this construction, with the
groupoid of smooth functions with smooth inverses as an application. -/
structure Pregroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] where
/-- Property describing membership in this groupoid: the pregroupoid "contains"
all functions `H → H` having the pregroupoid property on some `s : Set H` -/
property : (H → H) → Set H → Prop
/-- The pregroupoid property is stable under composition -/
comp : ∀ {f g u v}, property f u → property g v →
IsOpen u → IsOpen v → IsOpen (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v) → property (g ∘ f) (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
/-- Pregroupoids contain the identity map (on `univ`) -/
id_mem : property id univ
/-- The pregroupoid property is "local", in the sense that `f` has the pregroupoid property on `u`
iff its restriction to each open subset of `u` has it -/
locality :
∀ {f u}, IsOpen u → (∀ x ∈ u, ∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ v ∧ property f (u ∩ v)) → property f u
/-- If `f = g` on `u` and `property f u`, then `property g u` -/
congr : ∀ {f g : H → H} {u}, IsOpen u → (∀ x ∈ u, g x = f x) → property f u → property g u
/-- Construct a groupoid of partial homeos for which the map and its inverse have some property,
from a pregroupoid asserting that this property is stable under composition. -/
def Pregroupoid.groupoid (PG : Pregroupoid H) : StructureGroupoid H where
members := { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target }
trans' e e' he he' := by
constructor
· apply PG.comp he.1 he'.1 e.open_source e'.open_source
apply e.continuousOn_toFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_source e'.open_source
· apply PG.comp he'.2 he.2 e'.open_target e.open_target
apply e'.continuousOn_invFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e'.open_target e.open_target
symm' _ he := ⟨he.2, he.1⟩
id_mem' := ⟨PG.id_mem, PG.id_mem⟩
locality' e he := by
constructor
· refine PG.locality e.open_source fun x xu ↦ ?_
rcases he x xu with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, s_open, xs, ?_⟩
convert hs.1 using 1
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.restr]
rw [s_open.interior_eq]
· refine PG.locality e.open_target fun x xu ↦ ?_
rcases he (e.symm x) (e.map_target xu) with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩
refine ⟨e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s, ?_, ⟨xu, xs⟩, ?_⟩
· exact ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.continuousOn_invFun e.open_target s_open
· rw [← inter_assoc, inter_self]
convert hs.2 using 1
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.restr]
rw [s_open.interior_eq]
mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he ee' := by
constructor
· apply PG.congr e'.open_source ee'.2
simp only [ee'.1, he.1]
· have A := EqOnSource.symm' ee'
apply PG.congr e'.symm.open_source A.2
-- Porting note: was
-- convert he.2
-- rw [A.1]
-- rfl
rw [A.1, symm_toPartialEquiv, PartialEquiv.symm_source]
exact he.2
theorem mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid {PG : Pregroupoid H} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} :
e ∈ PG.groupoid ↔ PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target :=
Iff.rfl
theorem groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le (PG₁ PG₂ : Pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀ f s, PG₁.property f s → PG₂.property f s) : PG₁.groupoid ≤ PG₂.groupoid := by
refine StructureGroupoid.le_iff.2 fun e he ↦ ?_
rw [mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid] at he ⊢
exact ⟨h _ _ he.1, h _ _ he.2⟩
theorem mem_pregroupoid_of_eqOnSource (PG : Pregroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he' : e ≈ e') (he : PG.property e e.source) : PG.property e' e'.source := by
rw [← he'.1]
exact PG.congr e.open_source he'.eqOn.symm he
/-- The pregroupoid of all partial maps on a topological space `H`. -/
abbrev continuousPregroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : Pregroupoid H where
property _ _ := True
comp _ _ _ _ _ := trivial
id_mem := trivial
locality _ _ := trivial
congr _ _ _ := trivial
instance (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : Inhabited (Pregroupoid H) :=
⟨continuousPregroupoid H⟩
/-- The groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms on a topological space `H`. -/
def continuousGroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (continuousPregroupoid H)
/-- Every structure groupoid is contained in the groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms. -/
instance instStructureGroupoidOrderTop : OrderTop (StructureGroupoid H) where
top := continuousGroupoid H
le_top _ _ _ := ⟨trivial, trivial⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (StructureGroupoid H) :=
{ SetLike.instPartialOrder,
completeLatticeOfInf _ (by
exact fun s =>
⟨fun S Ss F hF => mem_iInter₂.mp hF S Ss,
fun T Tl F fT => mem_iInter₂.mpr (fun i his => Tl his fT)⟩) with
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
bot := instStructureGroupoidOrderBot.bot
bot_le := instStructureGroupoidOrderBot.bot_le
top := instStructureGroupoidOrderTop.top
le_top := instStructureGroupoidOrderTop.le_top
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁₂ h₁₃ _ hm ↦ ⟨h₁₂ hm, h₁₃ hm⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ ↦ And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ ↦ And.right }
/-- A groupoid is closed under restriction if it contains all restrictions of its element local
homeomorphisms to open subsets of the source. -/
class ClosedUnderRestriction (G : StructureGroupoid H) : Prop where
closedUnderRestriction :
∀ {e : PartialHomeomorph H H}, e ∈ G → ∀ s : Set H, IsOpen s → e.restr s ∈ G
theorem closedUnderRestriction' {G : StructureGroupoid H} [ClosedUnderRestriction G]
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) : e.restr s ∈ G :=
ClosedUnderRestriction.closedUnderRestriction he s hs
/-- The trivial restriction-closed groupoid, containing only partial homeomorphisms equivalent
to the restriction of the identity to the various open subsets. -/
def idRestrGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H where
members := { e | ∃ (s : Set H) (h : IsOpen s), e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s h }
trans' := by
rintro e e' ⟨s, hs, hse⟩ ⟨s', hs', hse'⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ s', hs.inter hs', ?_⟩
have := PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.trans' hse hse'
rwa [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_trans_ofSet] at this
symm' := by
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hse⟩
refine ⟨s, hs, ?_⟩
rw [← ofSet_symm]
exact PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.symm' hse
id_mem' := ⟨univ, isOpen_univ, by simp only [mfld_simps, refl]⟩
locality' := by
intro e h
refine ⟨e.source, e.open_source, by simp only [mfld_simps], ?_⟩
intro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨s, hs, hxs, s', hs', hes'⟩
have hes : x ∈ (e.restr s).source := by
rw [e.restr_source]
refine ⟨hx, ?_⟩
rw [hs.interior_eq]
exact hxs
simpa only [mfld_simps] using PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.eqOn hes' hes
mem_of_eqOnSource' := by
rintro e e' ⟨s, hs, hse⟩ hee'
exact ⟨s, hs, Setoid.trans hee' hse⟩
theorem idRestrGroupoid_mem {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) : ofSet s hs ∈ @idRestrGroupoid H _ :=
⟨s, hs, refl _⟩
/-- The trivial restriction-closed groupoid is indeed `ClosedUnderRestriction`. -/
instance closedUnderRestriction_idRestrGroupoid : ClosedUnderRestriction (@idRestrGroupoid H _) :=
⟨by
rintro e ⟨s', hs', he⟩ s hs
use s' ∩ s, hs'.inter hs
refine Setoid.trans (PartialHomeomorph.EqOnSource.restr he s) ?_
exact ⟨by simp only [hs.interior_eq, mfld_simps], by simp only [mfld_simps, eqOn_refl]⟩⟩
/-- A groupoid is closed under restriction if and only if it contains the trivial restriction-closed
groupoid. -/
theorem closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le (G : StructureGroupoid H) :
ClosedUnderRestriction G ↔ idRestrGroupoid ≤ G := by
constructor
· intro _i
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
refine G.mem_of_eqOnSource ?_ hes
convert closedUnderRestriction' G.id_mem hs
-- Porting note: was
-- change s = _ ∩ _
-- rw [hs.interior_eq]
-- simp only [mfld_simps]
ext
· rw [PartialHomeomorph.restr_apply, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply, id, ofSet_apply, id_eq]
· simp [hs]
· simp [hs.interior_eq]
· intro h
constructor
intro e he s hs
rw [← ofSet_trans (e : PartialHomeomorph H H) hs]
refine G.trans ?_ he
apply StructureGroupoid.le_iff.mp h
exact idRestrGroupoid_mem hs
/-- The groupoid of all partial homeomorphisms on a topological space `H`
is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (continuousGroupoid H) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr le_top
end Groupoid
/-! ### Charted spaces -/
/-- A charted space is a topological space endowed with an atlas, i.e., a set of local
homeomorphisms taking value in a model space `H`, called charts, such that the domains of the charts
cover the whole space. We express the covering property by choosing for each `x` a member
`chartAt x` of the atlas containing `x` in its source: in the smooth case, this is convenient to
construct the tangent bundle in an efficient way.
The model space is written as an explicit parameter as there can be several model spaces for a
given topological space. For instance, a complex manifold (modelled over `ℂ^n`) will also be seen
sometimes as a real manifold over `ℝ^(2n)`.
-/
@[ext]
class ChartedSpace (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] where
/-- The atlas of charts in the `ChartedSpace`. -/
protected atlas : Set (PartialHomeomorph M H)
/-- The preferred chart at each point in the charted space. -/
protected chartAt : M → PartialHomeomorph M H
protected mem_chart_source : ∀ x, x ∈ (chartAt x).source
protected chart_mem_atlas : ∀ x, chartAt x ∈ atlas
/-- The atlas of charts in a `ChartedSpace`. -/
abbrev atlas (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] : Set (PartialHomeomorph M H) :=
ChartedSpace.atlas
/-- The preferred chart at a point `x` in a charted space `M`. -/
abbrev chartAt (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : PartialHomeomorph M H :=
ChartedSpace.chartAt x
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma mem_chart_source (H : Type*) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : x ∈ (chartAt H x).source :=
ChartedSpace.mem_chart_source x
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma chart_mem_atlas (H : Type*) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : chartAt H x ∈ atlas H M :=
ChartedSpace.chart_mem_atlas x
lemma nonempty_of_chartedSpace {H : Type*} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] (x : M) : Nonempty H :=
⟨chartAt H x x⟩
lemma isEmpty_of_chartedSpace (H : Type*) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M] [IsEmpty H] : IsEmpty M := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty M with hM | ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
· exact hM
· exact (IsEmpty.false (chartAt H x x)).elim
section ChartedSpace
section
variable (H) [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- Porting note: Added `(H := H)` to avoid typeclass instance problem.
theorem mem_chart_target (x : M) : chartAt H x x ∈ (chartAt H x).target :=
(chartAt H x).map_source (mem_chart_source _ _)
theorem chart_source_mem_nhds (x : M) : (chartAt H x).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(chartAt H x).open_source.mem_nhds <| mem_chart_source H x
theorem chart_target_mem_nhds (x : M) : (chartAt H x).target ∈ 𝓝 (chartAt H x x) :=
(chartAt H x).open_target.mem_nhds <| mem_chart_target H x
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_source_chartAt : (⋃ x : M, (chartAt H x).source) = (univ : Set M) :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun x ↦ mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨x, mem_chart_source H x⟩
theorem ChartedSpace.isOpen_iff (s : Set M) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x : M, IsOpen <| chartAt H x '' ((chartAt H x).source ∩ s) := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_cover (fun i ↦ (chartAt H i).open_source) (iUnion_source_chartAt H M)]
simp only [(chartAt H _).isOpen_image_iff_of_subset_source inter_subset_left]
/-- `achart H x` is the chart at `x`, considered as an element of the atlas.
Especially useful for working with `BasicContMDiffVectorBundleCore`. -/
def achart (x : M) : atlas H M :=
⟨chartAt H x, chart_mem_atlas H x⟩
theorem achart_def (x : M) : achart H x = ⟨chartAt H x, chart_mem_atlas H x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_achart (x : M) : (achart H x : PartialHomeomorph M H) = chartAt H x :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem achart_val (x : M) : (achart H x).1 = chartAt H x :=
rfl
theorem mem_achart_source (x : M) : x ∈ (achart H x).1.source :=
mem_chart_source H x
open TopologicalSpace
theorem ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_countable_cover [SecondCountableTopology H] {s : Set M}
(hs : ⋃ (x) (_ : x ∈ s), (chartAt H x).source = univ) (hsc : s.Countable) :
SecondCountableTopology M := by
haveI : ∀ x : M, SecondCountableTopology (chartAt H x).source :=
fun x ↦ (chartAt (H := H) x).secondCountableTopology_source
haveI := hsc.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hs
exact secondCountableTopology_of_countable_cover (fun x : s ↦ (chartAt H (x : M)).open_source) hs
variable (M)
theorem ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SecondCountableTopology H]
[SigmaCompactSpace M] : SecondCountableTopology M := by
obtain ⟨s, hsc, hsU⟩ : ∃ s, Set.Countable s ∧ ⋃ (x) (_ : x ∈ s), (chartAt H x).source = univ :=
countable_cover_nhds_of_sigmaCompact fun x : M ↦ chart_source_mem_nhds H x
exact ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_countable_cover H hsU hsc
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-13")] alias
ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_sigma_compact := ChartedSpace.secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact
/-- If a topological space admits an atlas with locally compact charts, then the space itself
is locally compact. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace H] : LocallyCompactSpace M := by
have : ∀ x : M, (𝓝 x).HasBasis
(fun s ↦ s ∈ 𝓝 (chartAt H x x) ∧ IsCompact s ∧ s ⊆ (chartAt H x).target)
fun s ↦ (chartAt H x).symm '' s := fun x ↦ by
rw [← (chartAt H x).symm_map_nhds_eq (mem_chart_source H x)]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (chartAt H x x)).hasBasis_self_subset
(chart_target_mem_nhds H x)).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩
exact h₂.image_of_continuousOn ((chartAt H x).continuousOn_symm.mono h₃)
/-- If a topological space admits an atlas with locally connected charts, then the space itself is
locally connected. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.locallyConnectedSpace [LocallyConnectedSpace H] : LocallyConnectedSpace M := by
let e : M → PartialHomeomorph M H := chartAt H
refine locallyConnectedSpace_of_connected_bases (fun x s ↦ (e x).symm '' s)
(fun x s ↦ (IsOpen s ∧ e x x ∈ s ∧ IsConnected s) ∧ s ⊆ (e x).target) ?_ ?_
· intro x
simpa only [e, PartialHomeomorph.symm_map_nhds_eq, mem_chart_source] using
((LocallyConnectedSpace.open_connected_basis (e x x)).restrict_subset
((e x).open_target.mem_nhds (mem_chart_target H x))).map (e x).symm
· rintro x s ⟨⟨-, -, hsconn⟩, hssubset⟩
exact hsconn.isPreconnected.image _ ((e x).continuousOn_symm.mono hssubset)
/-- If a topological space `M` admits an atlas with locally path-connected charts,
then `M` itself is locally path-connected. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.locPathConnectedSpace [LocPathConnectedSpace H] : LocPathConnectedSpace M := by
refine ⟨fun x ↦ ⟨fun s ↦ ⟨fun hs ↦ ?_, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ ↦ Filter.mem_of_superset hu.1.1 hu.2⟩⟩⟩
let e := chartAt H x
let t := s ∩ e.source
have ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x := Filter.inter_mem hs (chart_source_mem_nhds _ _)
refine ⟨e.symm '' pathComponentIn (e x) (e '' t), ⟨?_, ?_⟩, (?_ : _ ⊆ t).trans inter_subset_left⟩
· nth_rewrite 1 [← e.left_inv (mem_chart_source _ _)]
apply e.symm.image_mem_nhds (by simp [e])
exact pathComponentIn_mem_nhds <| e.image_mem_nhds (mem_chart_source _ _) ht
· refine (isPathConnected_pathComponentIn <| mem_image_of_mem e (mem_of_mem_nhds ht)).image' ?_
refine e.continuousOn_symm.mono <| subset_trans ?_ e.map_source''
exact (pathComponentIn_mono <| image_mono inter_subset_right).trans pathComponentIn_subset
· exact (image_mono pathComponentIn_subset).trans
(PartialEquiv.symm_image_image_of_subset_source _ inter_subset_right).subset
/-- If `M` is modelled on `H'` and `H'` is itself modelled on `H`, then we can consider `M` as being
modelled on `H`. -/
def ChartedSpace.comp (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H']
(M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H H'] [ChartedSpace H' M] :
ChartedSpace H M where
atlas := image2 PartialHomeomorph.trans (atlas H' M) (atlas H H')
chartAt p := (chartAt H' p).trans (chartAt H (chartAt H' p p))
mem_chart_source p := by simp only [mfld_simps]
chart_mem_atlas p := ⟨chartAt _ p, chart_mem_atlas _ p, chartAt _ _, chart_mem_atlas _ _, rfl⟩
theorem chartAt_comp (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H']
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H H'] [ChartedSpace H' M] (x : M) :
(letI := ChartedSpace.comp H H' M; chartAt H x) = chartAt H' x ≫ₕ chartAt H (chartAt H' x x) :=
rfl
/-- A charted space over a T1 space is T1. Note that this is *not* true for T2 (for instance for
the real line with a double origin). -/
theorem ChartedSpace.t1Space [T1Space H] : T1Space M := by
apply t1Space_iff_exists_open.2 (fun x y hxy ↦ ?_)
by_cases hy : y ∈ (chartAt H x).source
· refine ⟨(chartAt H x).source ∩ (chartAt H x)⁻¹' ({chartAt H x y}ᶜ), ?_, ?_, by simp⟩
· exact PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_inter_preimage _ isOpen_compl_singleton
· simp only [preimage_compl, mem_inter_iff, mem_chart_source, mem_compl_iff, mem_preimage,
mem_singleton_iff, true_and]
exact (chartAt H x).injOn.ne (ChartedSpace.mem_chart_source x) hy hxy
· exact ⟨(chartAt H x).source, (chartAt H x).open_source, ChartedSpace.mem_chart_source x, hy⟩
/-- A charted space over a discrete space is discrete. -/
theorem ChartedSpace.discreteTopology [DiscreteTopology H] : DiscreteTopology M := by
apply singletons_open_iff_discrete.1 (fun x ↦ ?_)
have : IsOpen ((chartAt H x).source ∩ (chartAt H x) ⁻¹' {chartAt H x x}) :=
isOpen_inter_preimage _ (isOpen_discrete _)
convert this
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp) ?_
simp only [subset_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, and_imp]
intro y hy h'y
exact (chartAt H x).injOn hy (mem_chart_source _ x) h'y
end
section Constructions
/-- An empty type is a charted space over any topological space. -/
def ChartedSpace.empty (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H]
(M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [IsEmpty M] : ChartedSpace H M where
atlas := ∅
chartAt x := (IsEmpty.false x).elim
mem_chart_source x := (IsEmpty.false x).elim
chart_mem_atlas x := (IsEmpty.false x).elim
/-- Any space is a `ChartedSpace` modelled over itself, by just using the identity chart. -/
instance chartedSpaceSelf (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] : ChartedSpace H H where
atlas := {PartialHomeomorph.refl H}
chartAt _ := PartialHomeomorph.refl H
mem_chart_source x := mem_univ x
chart_mem_atlas _ := mem_singleton _
/-- In the trivial `ChartedSpace` structure of a space modelled over itself through the identity,
the atlas members are just the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem chartedSpaceSelf_atlas {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} :
e ∈ atlas H H ↔ e = PartialHomeomorph.refl H :=
Iff.rfl
/-- In the model space, `chartAt` is always the identity. -/
theorem chartAt_self_eq {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {x : H} :
chartAt H x = PartialHomeomorph.refl H := rfl
/-- Any discrete space is a charted space over a singleton set.
We keep this as a definition (not an instance) to avoid instance search trying to search for
`DiscreteTopology` or `Unique` instances.
-/
def ChartedSpace.of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace H]
[DiscreteTopology M] [h : Unique H] : ChartedSpace H M where
atlas :=
letI f := fun x : M ↦ PartialHomeomorph.const
(isOpen_discrete {x}) (isOpen_discrete {h.default})
Set.image f univ
chartAt x := PartialHomeomorph.const (isOpen_discrete {x}) (isOpen_discrete {h.default})
mem_chart_source x := by simp
chart_mem_atlas x := by simp
/-- A chart on the discrete space is the constant chart. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
lemma chartedSpace_of_discreteTopology_chartAt [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace H]
[DiscreteTopology M] [h : Unique H] {x : M} :
haveI := ChartedSpace.of_discreteTopology (M := M) (H := H)
chartAt H x = PartialHomeomorph.const (isOpen_discrete {x}) (isOpen_discrete {h.default}) :=
rfl
section Products
library_note "Manifold type tags" /-- For technical reasons we introduce two type tags:
* `ModelProd H H'` is the same as `H × H'`;
* `ModelPi H` is the same as `∀ i, H i`, where `H : ι → Type*` and `ι` is a finite type.
In both cases the reason is the same, so we explain it only in the case of the product. A charted
space `M` with model `H` is a set of charts from `M` to `H` covering the space. Every space is
registered as a charted space over itself, using the only chart `id`, in `chartedSpaceSelf`. You
can also define a product of charted space `M` and `M'` (with model space `H × H'`) by taking the
products of the charts. Now, on `H × H'`, there are two charted space structures with model space
`H × H'` itself, the one coming from `chartedSpaceSelf`, and the one coming from the product of
the two `chartedSpaceSelf` on each component. They are equal, but not defeq (because the product
of `id` and `id` is not defeq to `id`), which is bad as we know. This expedient of renaming `H × H'`
solves this problem. -/
/-- Same thing as `H × H'`. We introduce it for technical reasons,
see note [Manifold type tags]. -/
def ModelProd (H : Type*) (H' : Type*) :=
H × H'
/-- Same thing as `∀ i, H i`. We introduce it for technical reasons,
see note [Manifold type tags]. -/
def ModelPi {ι : Type*} (H : ι → Type*) :=
∀ i, H i
section
-- attribute [local reducible] ModelProd -- Porting note: not available in Lean4
instance modelProdInhabited [Inhabited H] [Inhabited H'] : Inhabited (ModelProd H H') :=
instInhabitedProd
instance (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (H' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H'] :
TopologicalSpace (ModelProd H H') :=
instTopologicalSpaceProd
-- Next lemma shows up often when dealing with derivatives, so we register it as simp lemma.
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelProd_range_prod_id {H : Type*} {H' : Type*} {α : Type*} (f : H → α) :
(range fun p : ModelProd H H' ↦ (f p.1, p.2)) = range f ×ˢ (univ : Set H') := by
rw [prod_range_univ_eq]
rfl
end
section
|
variable {ι : Type*} {Hi : ι → Type*}
instance modelPiInhabited [∀ i, Inhabited (Hi i)] : Inhabited (ModelPi Hi) :=
Pi.instInhabited
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ChartedSpace.lean | 835 | 840 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,691 | 1,692 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| | 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 69 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ClassNumber.AdmissibleAbs
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ClassNumber.Finite
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Discriminant.Basic
/-!
# Class numbers of number fields
This file defines the class number of a number field as the (finite) cardinality of
the class group of its ring of integers. It also proves some elementary results
on the class number.
## Main definitions
- `NumberField.classNumber`: the class number of a number field is the (finite)
cardinality of the class group of its ring of integers
-/
namespace NumberField
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
namespace RingOfIntegers
noncomputable instance instFintypeClassGroup : Fintype (ClassGroup (𝓞 K)) :=
ClassGroup.fintypeOfAdmissibleOfFinite ℚ K AbsoluteValue.absIsAdmissible
end RingOfIntegers
/-- The class number of a number field is the (finite) cardinality of the class group. -/
noncomputable def classNumber : ℕ :=
Fintype.card (ClassGroup (𝓞 K))
variable {K}
/-- The class number of a number field is `1` iff the ring of integers is a PID. -/
theorem classNumber_eq_one_iff : classNumber K = 1 ↔ IsPrincipalIdealRing (𝓞 K) :=
card_classGroup_eq_one_iff
open Module NumberField.InfinitePlace
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Real
theorem exists_ideal_in_class_of_norm_le (C : ClassGroup (𝓞 K)) :
∃ I : (Ideal (𝓞 K))⁰, ClassGroup.mk0 I = C ∧
Ideal.absNorm (I : Ideal (𝓞 K)) ≤ (4 / π) ^ nrComplexPlaces K *
((finrank ℚ K).factorial / (finrank ℚ K) ^ (finrank ℚ K) * Real.sqrt |discr K|) := by
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ := ClassGroup.mk0_surjective C⁻¹
obtain ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, h_nz, h_nm⟩ :=
exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr K (FractionalIdeal.mk0 K J)
obtain ⟨I₀, hI⟩ := Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr ((Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem J).mpr (by convert ha))
have : I₀ ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h_nz
rw [h_nz, mul_zero, show 0 = (⊥ : Ideal (𝓞 K)) by rfl, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at hI
rw [Algebra.linearMap_apply, hI, map_zero]
let I := (⟨I₀, mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr this⟩ : (Ideal (𝓞 K))⁰)
refine ⟨I, ?_, ?_⟩
· suffices ClassGroup.mk0 I = (ClassGroup.mk0 J)⁻¹ by rw [this, hJ, inv_inv]
exact ClassGroup.mk0_eq_mk0_inv_iff.mpr ⟨a, Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_nz, by rw [mul_comm, hI]⟩
· rw [← FractionalIdeal.absNorm_span_singleton (𝓞 K), Algebra.linearMap_apply,
← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_span_singleton, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_absNorm, hI, map_mul,
Nat.cast_mul, Rat.cast_mul, show Ideal.absNorm I₀ = Ideal.absNorm (I : Ideal (𝓞 K)) by rfl,
Rat.cast_natCast, Rat.cast_natCast, FractionalIdeal.coe_mk0,
FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_absNorm, Rat.cast_natCast, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
at h_nm
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_of_pos_left h_nm ?_
exact Nat.cast_pos.mpr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| Ideal.absNorm_ne_zero_of_nonZeroDivisors J
theorem _root_.RingOfIntegers.isPrincipalIdealRing_of_abs_discr_lt
(h : |discr K| < (2 * (π / 4) ^ nrComplexPlaces K *
((finrank ℚ K) ^ (finrank ℚ K) / (finrank ℚ K).factorial)) ^ 2) :
IsPrincipalIdealRing (𝓞 K) := by
have : 0 < finrank ℚ K := finrank_pos -- Lean needs to know that for positivity to succeed
| rw [← Real.sqrt_lt (by positivity) (by positivity), mul_assoc, ← inv_mul_lt_iff₀' (by positivity),
mul_inv, ← inv_pow, inv_div, inv_div, mul_assoc, Int.cast_abs] at h
rw [← classNumber_eq_one_iff, classNumber, Fintype.card_eq_one_iff]
refine ⟨1, fun C ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨I, rfl, hI⟩ := exists_ideal_in_class_of_norm_le C
have : Ideal.absNorm I.1 = 1 := by
refine le_antisymm (Nat.lt_succ.mp ?_) (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
(Ideal.absNorm_ne_zero_of_nonZeroDivisors I))
exact Nat.cast_lt.mp <| lt_of_le_of_lt hI h
rw [ClassGroup.mk0_eq_one_iff, Ideal.absNorm_eq_one_iff.mp this]
exact top_isPrincipal
end NumberField
namespace Rat
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/ClassNumber.lean | 77 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
/-!
# UV-compressions
This file defines UV-compression. It is an operation on a set family that reduces its shadow.
UV-compressing `a : α` along `u v : α` means replacing `a` by `(a ⊔ u) \ v` if `a` and `u` are
disjoint and `v ≤ a`. In some sense, it's moving `a` from `v` to `u`.
UV-compressions are immensely useful to prove the Kruskal-Katona theorem. The idea is that
compressing a set family might decrease the size of its shadow, so iterated compressions hopefully
minimise the shadow.
## Main declarations
* `UV.compress`: `compress u v a` is `a` compressed along `u` and `v`.
* `UV.compression`: `compression u v s` is the compression of the set family `s` along `u` and `v`.
It is the compressions of the elements of `s` whose compression is not already in `s` along with
the element whose compression is already in `s`. This way of splitting into what moves and what
does not ensures the compression doesn't squash the set family, which is proved by
`UV.card_compression`.
* `UV.card_shadow_compression_le`: Compressing reduces the size of the shadow. This is a key fact in
the proof of Kruskal-Katona.
## Notation
`𝓒` (typed with `\MCC`) is notation for `UV.compression` in locale `FinsetFamily`.
## Notes
Even though our emphasis is on `Finset α`, we define UV-compressions more generally in a generalized
boolean algebra, so that one can use it for `Set α`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, UV-compression, shadow
-/
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- UV-compression is injective on the elements it moves. See `UV.compress`. -/
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
/-! ### UV-compression in generalized boolean algebras -/
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableLE α] {s : Finset α} {u v a : α}
/-- UV-compressing `a` means removing `v` from it and adding `u` if `a` and `u` are disjoint and
`v ≤ a` (it replaces the `v` part of `a` by the `u` part). Else, UV-compressing `a` doesn't do
anything. This is most useful when `u` and `v` are disjoint finsets of the same size. -/
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· exact h.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
· rfl
/-- An element can be compressed to any other element by removing/adding the differences. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_sdiff_sdiff (a b : α) : compress (a \ b) (b \ a) b = a := by
refine (compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_left sdiff_le).trans ?_
rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff, disjoint_sdiff_self_right.sdiff_eq_left, sup_eq_right]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le
/-- Compressing an element is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_idem (u v a : α) : compress u v (compress u v a) = compress u v a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h h'
· rw [le_sdiff_right.1 h'.2, sdiff_bot, sdiff_bot, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
· rfl
· rfl
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- To UV-compress a set family, we compress each of its elements, except that we don't want to
reduce the cardinality, so we keep all elements whose compression is already present. -/
def compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} ∪ {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s}
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓒 " => UV.compression
open scoped FinsetFamily
/-- `IsCompressed u v s` expresses that `s` is UV-compressed. -/
def IsCompressed (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
𝓒 u v s = s
/-- UV-compression is injective on the sets that are not UV-compressed. -/
theorem compress_injOn : Set.InjOn (compress u v) ↑{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∉ s} := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at ha hb
rw [compress] at ha hab
split_ifs at ha hab with has
· rw [compress] at hb hab
split_ifs at hb hab with hbs
· exact sup_sdiff_injOn u v has hbs hab
· exact (hb.2 hb.1).elim
· exact (ha.2 ha.1).elim
/-- `a` is in the UV-compressed family iff it's in the original and its compression is in the
original, or it's not in the original but it's the compression of something in the original. -/
theorem mem_compression :
a ∈ 𝓒 u v s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ compress u v a ∈ s ∨ a ∉ s ∧ ∃ b ∈ s, compress u v b = a := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm]
protected theorem IsCompressed.eq (h : IsCompressed u v s) : 𝓒 u v s = s := h
@[simp]
theorem compression_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u u s = s := by
unfold compression
convert union_empty s
· ext a
rw [mem_filter, compress_self, and_self_iff]
· refine eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_image, compress_self] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, hb'⟩ := ha
exact hb' hb
/-- Any family is compressed along two identical elements. -/
theorem isCompressed_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : IsCompressed u u s := compression_self u s
theorem compress_disjoint :
Disjoint {a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s} :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha₁ ha₂ ↦ (mem_filter.1 ha₂).2 (mem_filter.1 ha₁).1
theorem compress_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ s) : compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression]
by_cases h : compress u v a ∈ s
· rw [compress_idem]
exact Or.inl ⟨h, h⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨h, a, ha, rfl⟩
-- This is a special case of `compress_mem_compression` once we have `compression_idem`.
theorem compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) :
compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression] at ha ⊢
simp only [compress_idem, exists_prop]
obtain ⟨_, ha⟩ | ⟨_, b, hb, rfl⟩ := ha
· exact Or.inl ⟨ha, ha⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [compress_idem], b, hb, (compress_idem _ _ _).symm⟩
/-- Compressing a family is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compression_idem (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u v (𝓒 u v s) = 𝓒 u v s := by
have h : {a ∈ 𝓒 u v s | compress u v a ∉ 𝓒 u v s} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun a ha h ↦ h <| compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression ha
rw [compression, filter_image, h, image_empty, ← h]
exact filter_union_filter_neg_eq _ (compression u v s)
/-- Compressing a family doesn't change its size. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : #(𝓒 u v s) = #s := by
rw [compression, card_union_of_disjoint compress_disjoint, filter_image,
card_image_of_injOn compress_injOn, ← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s _ _),
filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
theorem le_of_mem_compression_of_not_mem (h : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (ha : a ∉ s) : u ≤ a := by
rw [mem_compression] at h
obtain h | ⟨-, b, hb, hba⟩ := h
· cases ha h.1
unfold compress at hba
split_ifs at hba with h
· rw [← hba, le_sdiff]
exact ⟨le_sup_right, h.1.mono_right h.2⟩
· cases ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha hba
theorem disjoint_of_mem_compression_of_not_mem (h : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint v a := by
rw [mem_compression] at h
obtain h | ⟨-, b, hb, hba⟩ := h
· cases ha h.1
unfold compress at hba
split_ifs at hba
· rw [← hba]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_right
· cases ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha hba
theorem sup_sdiff_mem_of_mem_compression_of_not_mem (h : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(a ⊔ v) \ u ∈ s := by
rw [mem_compression] at h
obtain h | ⟨-, b, hb, hba⟩ := h
· cases ha h.1
unfold compress at hba
split_ifs at hba with h
· rwa [← hba, sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left h.2), sup_sdiff_right_self,
h.1.symm.sdiff_eq_left]
· cases ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha hba
/-- If `a` is in the family compression and can be compressed, then its compression is in the
original family. -/
theorem sup_sdiff_mem_of_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (hva : v ≤ a) (hua : Disjoint u a) :
(a ⊔ u) \ v ∈ s := by
rw [mem_compression, compress_of_disjoint_of_le hua hva] at ha
obtain ⟨_, ha⟩ | ⟨_, b, hb, rfl⟩ := ha
· exact ha
have hu : u = ⊥ := by
suffices Disjoint u (u \ v) by rwa [(hua.mono_right hva).sdiff_eq_left, disjoint_self] at this
refine hua.mono_right ?_
rw [← compress_idem, compress_of_disjoint_of_le hua hva]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_sup_right
have hv : v = ⊥ := by
rw [← disjoint_self]
apply Disjoint.mono_right hva
rw [← compress_idem, compress_of_disjoint_of_le hua hva]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_right
rwa [hu, hv, compress_self, sup_bot_eq, sdiff_bot]
/-- If `a` is in the `u, v`-compression but `v ≤ a`, then `a` must have been in the original
family. -/
theorem mem_of_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) (hva : v ≤ a) (hvu : v = ⊥ → u = ⊥) :
a ∈ s := by
rw [mem_compression] at ha
obtain ha | ⟨_, b, hb, h⟩ := ha
· exact ha.1
unfold compress at h
split_ifs at h
· rw [← h, le_sdiff_right] at hva
rwa [← h, hvu hva, hva, sup_bot_eq, sdiff_bot]
· rwa [← h]
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
/-! ### UV-compression on finsets -/
open FinsetFamily
variable [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {u v : Finset α} {r : ℕ}
/-- Compressing a finset doesn't change its size. -/
theorem card_compress (huv : #u = #v) (a : Finset α) : #(compress u v a) = #a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· rw [card_sdiff (h.2.trans le_sup_left), sup_eq_union, card_union_of_disjoint h.1.symm, huv,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
| · rfl
lemma _root_.Set.Sized.uvCompression (huv : #u = #v) (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized r) :
(𝓒 u v 𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized r := by
simp_rw [Set.Sized, mem_coe, mem_compression]
rintro s (hs | ⟨huvt, t, ht, rfl⟩)
· exact h𝒜 hs.1
· rw [card_compress huv, h𝒜 ht]
private theorem aux (huv : ∀ x ∈ u, ∃ y ∈ v, IsCompressed (u.erase x) (v.erase y) 𝒜) :
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 276 | 285 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.smul_comp
@[simp]
protected lemma id_comp {n : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain F G n) :
(Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F)).comp z₂ (zero_add n) = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [zero_cochain_comp_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_zero {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (0 : Cochain G K n₂) h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, comp_zero]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_add {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ + z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, comp_add]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_sub {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ - z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, comp_sub]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_neg {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (-z₂) h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, comp_neg]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : R) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.comp_smul]
@[simp]
lemma comp_units_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : Rˣ) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.comp_smul
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_id {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) :
z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G)) (add_zero n) = z₁ := by
ext p q hpq
| simp only [comp_zero_cochain_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, comp_id]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 379 | 381 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HahnBanach.Extension
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HahnBanach.Separation
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Completeness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
/-!
# Spaces with separating dual
We introduce a typeclass `SeparatingDual R V`, registering that the points of the topological
module `V` over `R` can be separated by continuous linear forms.
This property is satisfied for normed spaces over `ℝ` or `ℂ` (by the analytic Hahn-Banach theorem)
and for locally convex topological spaces over `ℝ` (by the geometric Hahn-Banach theorem).
Under the assumption `SeparatingDual R V`, we show in
`SeparatingDual.exists_continuousLinearMap_apply_eq` that the group of continuous linear
equivalences acts transitively on the set of nonzero vectors.
-/
/-- When `E` is a topological module over a topological ring `R`, the class `SeparatingDual R E`
registers that continuous linear forms on `E` separate points of `E`. -/
@[mk_iff separatingDual_def]
class SeparatingDual (R V : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup V] [TopologicalSpace V]
[TopologicalSpace R] [Module R V] : Prop where
/-- Any nonzero vector can be mapped by a continuous linear map to a nonzero scalar. -/
exists_ne_zero' : ∀ (x : V), x ≠ 0 → ∃ f : V →L[R] R, f x ≠ 0
instance {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [AddCommGroup E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
[Module ℝ E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E] [LocallyConvexSpace ℝ E] [T1Space E] : SeparatingDual ℝ E :=
⟨fun x hx ↦ by
rcases geometric_hahn_banach_point_point hx.symm with ⟨f, hf⟩
simp only [map_zero] at hf
exact ⟨f, hf.ne'⟩⟩
instance {E 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : SeparatingDual 𝕜 E :=
⟨fun x hx ↦ by
rcases exists_dual_vector 𝕜 x hx with ⟨f, -, hf⟩
refine ⟨f, ?_⟩
simpa [hf] using hx⟩
namespace SeparatingDual
section Ring
variable {R V : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup V] [TopologicalSpace V]
[TopologicalSpace R] [Module R V] [SeparatingDual R V]
lemma exists_ne_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ f : V →L[R] R, f x ≠ 0 :=
exists_ne_zero' x hx
theorem exists_separating_of_ne {x y : V} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ f : V →L[R] R, f x ≠ f y := by
rcases exists_ne_zero (R := R) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne h) with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨f, by simpa [sub_ne_zero] using hf⟩
protected theorem t1Space [T1Space R] : T1Space V := by
apply t1Space_iff_exists_open.2 (fun x y hxy ↦ ?_)
rcases exists_separating_of_ne (R := R) hxy with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨f ⁻¹' {f y}ᶜ, isOpen_compl_singleton.preimage f.continuous, hf, by simp⟩
protected theorem t2Space [T2Space R] : T2Space V := by
apply (t2Space_iff _).2 (fun {x} {y} hxy ↦ ?_)
rcases exists_separating_of_ne (R := R) hxy with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact separated_by_continuous f.continuous hf
end Ring
section Field
variable {R V : Type*} [Field R] [AddCommGroup V] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace V]
[IsTopologicalRing R] [Module R V]
-- TODO (@alreadydone): this could generalize to CommRing R if we were to add a section
theorem _root_.separatingDual_iff_injective : SeparatingDual R V ↔
Function.Injective (ContinuousLinearMap.coeLM (R := R) R (M := V) (N₃ := R)).flip := by
simp_rw [separatingDual_def, Ne, injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
congrm ∀ v, ?_
rw [not_imp_comm, LinearMap.ext_iff]
push_neg; rfl
variable [SeparatingDual R V]
open Function in
/-- Given a finite-dimensional subspace `W` of a space `V` with separating dual, any
linear functional on `W` extends to a continuous linear functional on `V`.
This is stated more generally for an injective linear map from `W` to `V`. -/
theorem dualMap_surjective_iff {W} [AddCommGroup W] [Module R W] [FiniteDimensional R W]
{f : W →ₗ[R] V} : Surjective (f.dualMap ∘ ContinuousLinearMap.toLinearMap) ↔ Injective f := by
constructor <;> intro hf
· exact LinearMap.dualMap_surjective_iff.mp hf.of_comp
have := (separatingDual_iff_injective.mp ‹_›).comp hf
rw [← LinearMap.coe_comp] at this
exact LinearMap.flip_surjective_iff₁.mpr this
lemma exists_eq_one {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ f : V →L[R] R, f x = 1 := by
rcases exists_ne_zero (R := R) hx with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨(f x)⁻¹ • f, inv_mul_cancel₀ hf⟩
theorem exists_eq_one_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_pair {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
∃ f : V →L[R] R, f x = 1 ∧ f y ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨u, ux⟩ : ∃ u : V →L[R] R, u x = 1 := exists_eq_one hx
rcases ne_or_eq (u y) 0 with uy|uy
· exact ⟨u, ux, uy⟩
obtain ⟨v, vy⟩ : ∃ v : V →L[R] R, v y = 1 := exists_eq_one hy
rcases ne_or_eq (v x) 0 with vx|vx
· exact ⟨(v x)⁻¹ • v, inv_mul_cancel₀ vx, show (v x)⁻¹ * v y ≠ 0 by simp [vx, vy]⟩
· exact ⟨u + v, by simp [ux, vx], by simp [uy, vy]⟩
| variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup V]
/-- In a topological vector space with separating dual, the group of continuous linear equivalences
acts transitively on the set of nonzero vectors: given two nonzero vectors `x` and `y`, there
exists `A : V ≃L[R] V` mapping `x` to `y`. -/
theorem exists_continuousLinearEquiv_apply_eq [ContinuousSMul R V]
{x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
∃ A : V ≃L[R] V, A x = y := by
obtain ⟨G, Gx, Gy⟩ : ∃ G : V →L[R] R, G x = 1 ∧ G y ≠ 0 :=
exists_eq_one_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_pair hx hy
let A : V ≃L[R] V :=
{ toFun := fun z ↦ z + G z • (y - x)
invFun := fun z ↦ z + ((G y) ⁻¹ * G z) • (x - y)
map_add' := fun a b ↦ by simp [add_smul]; abel
map_smul' := by simp [smul_smul]
left_inv := fun z ↦ by
simp only [id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast, RingHom.id_apply, smul_eq_mul, AddHom.toFun_eq_coe,
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
AddHom.coe_mk, map_add, map_smulₛₗ _, map_sub, Gx, mul_sub, mul_one, add_sub_cancel]
rw [mul_comm (G z), ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ Gy]
simp only [smul_sub, one_mul]
abel
right_inv := fun z ↦ by
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simp only [map_add, map_smulₛₗ _, map_mul, map_inv₀, RingHom.id_apply, map_sub, Gx,
smul_eq_mul, mul_sub, mul_one]
rw [mul_comm _ (G y), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ Gy]
simp only [smul_sub, one_mul, add_sub_cancel]
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/HahnBanach/SeparatingDual.lean | 117 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Deriv
/-!
# The function `x ↦ - x * log x`
The purpose of this file is to record basic analytic properties of the function `x ↦ - x * log x`,
which is notably used in the theory of Shannon entropy.
## Main definitions
* `negMulLog`: the function `x ↦ - x * log x` from `ℝ` to `ℝ`.
-/
open scoped Topology
namespace Real
@[fun_prop]
lemma continuous_mul_log : Continuous fun x ↦ x * log x := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
obtain hx | rfl := ne_or_eq x 0
· exact (continuous_id'.continuousAt).mul (continuousAt_log hx)
rw [ContinuousAt, zero_mul]
simp_rw [mul_comm _ (log _)]
nth_rewrite 1 [← nhdsWithin_univ]
have : (Set.univ : Set ℝ) = Set.Iio 0 ∪ Set.Ioi 0 ∪ {0} := by ext; simp [em]
rw [this, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_union]
simp only [nhdsWithin_singleton, sup_le_iff, Filter.nonpos_iff, Filter.tendsto_sup]
refine ⟨⟨tendsto_log_mul_self_nhdsLT_zero, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simpa only [rpow_one] using tendsto_log_mul_rpow_nhdsGT_zero zero_lt_one
· convert tendsto_pure_nhds (fun x ↦ log x * x) 0
simp
@[fun_prop]
lemma Continuous.mul_log {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ f a * log (f a) := continuous_mul_log.comp hf
lemma differentiableOn_mul_log : DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x ↦ x * log x) {0}ᶜ :=
differentiable_id'.differentiableOn.mul differentiableOn_log
@[simp]
lemma deriv_mul_log {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : deriv (fun x ↦ x * log x) x = log x + 1 := by
rw [deriv_mul differentiableAt_id' (differentiableAt_log hx)]
simp only [deriv_id'', one_mul, deriv_log', ne_eq, add_right_inj]
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ hx
lemma hasDerivAt_mul_log {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt (fun x ↦ x * log x) (log x + 1) x := by
rw [← deriv_mul_log hx, hasDerivAt_deriv_iff]
refine DifferentiableOn.differentiableAt differentiableOn_mul_log ?_
simp [hx]
@[simp]
lemma rightDeriv_mul_log {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
derivWithin (fun x ↦ x * log x) (Set.Ioi x) x = log x + 1 :=
(hasDerivAt_mul_log hx).hasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Ioi x)
@[simp]
lemma leftDeriv_mul_log {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
derivWithin (fun x ↦ x * log x) (Set.Iio x) x = log x + 1 :=
(hasDerivAt_mul_log hx).hasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Iio x)
open Filter in
private lemma tendsto_deriv_mul_log_nhdsWithin_zero :
Tendsto (deriv (fun x ↦ x * log x)) (𝓝[>] 0) atBot := by
have : (deriv (fun x ↦ x * log x)) =ᶠ[𝓝[>] 0] (fun x ↦ log x + 1) := by
apply eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hx
exact deriv_mul_log hx.ne'
simp only [tendsto_congr' this, tendsto_atBot_add_const_right, tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero]
open Filter in
lemma tendsto_deriv_mul_log_atTop :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ deriv (fun x ↦ x * log x) x) atTop atTop := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mpr (tendsto_log_atTop.atTop_add (tendsto_const_nhds (x := 1)))
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨1, fun _ hx ↦ deriv_mul_log (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx).ne'⟩
open Filter in
lemma tendsto_rightDeriv_mul_log_atTop :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ derivWithin (fun x ↦ x * log x) (Set.Ioi x) x) atTop atTop := by
| refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mpr (tendsto_log_atTop.atTop_add (tendsto_const_nhds (x := 1)))
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atTop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/NegMulLog.lean | 91 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Basic
/-!
# Algebra instance on adic completion
In this file we provide an algebra instance on the adic completion of a ring. Then the adic
completion of any module is a module over the adic completion of the ring.
## Implementation details
We do not make a separate adic completion type in algebra case, to not duplicate all module
theoretic results on adic completions. This choice does cause some trouble though,
since `I ^ n • ⊤` is not defeq to `I ^ n`. We try to work around most of the trouble by
providing as much API as possible.
-/
suppress_compilation
open Submodule
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (I : Ideal R)
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
namespace AdicCompletion
attribute [-simp] smul_eq_mul Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_ideal_mk {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (x : R) :
transitionMap I R hmn (Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) x) =
Ideal.Quotient.mk (I ^ m • ⊤ : Ideal R) x :=
rfl
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_map_one {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : transitionMap I R hmn 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_map_mul {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (x y : R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :
transitionMap I R hmn (x * y) = transitionMap I R hmn x * transitionMap I R hmn y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
@[local simp]
theorem transitionMap_map_pow {m n a : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (x : R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :
transitionMap I R hmn (x ^ a) = transitionMap I R hmn x ^ a :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x (fun _ ↦ rfl)
/-- `AdicCompletion.transitionMap` as an algebra homomorphism. -/
def transitionMapₐ {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) →ₐ[R] R ⧸ (I ^ m • ⊤ : Ideal R) :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (transitionMap I R hmn) rfl (transitionMap_map_mul I hmn)
/-- `AdicCompletion I R` is an `R`-subalgebra of `∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)`. -/
def subalgebra : Subalgebra R (∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :=
Submodule.toSubalgebra (submodule I R) (fun _ ↦ by simp [transitionMap_map_one I])
(fun x y hx hy m n hmn ↦ by simp [hx hmn, hy hmn, transitionMap_map_mul I hmn])
/-- `AdicCompletion I R` is a subring of `∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)`. -/
def subring : Subring (∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R)) :=
Subalgebra.toSubring (subalgebra I)
instance : Mul (AdicCompletion I R) where
mul x y := ⟨x.val * y.val, fun hmn ↦ by
simp [x.property, y.property, transitionMap_map_mul I hmn]⟩
instance : One (AdicCompletion I R) where
one := ⟨1, by simp [transitionMap_map_one I]⟩
instance : NatCast (AdicCompletion I R) where
natCast n := ⟨n, fun _ ↦ rfl⟩
instance : IntCast (AdicCompletion I R) where
intCast n := ⟨n, fun _ ↦ rfl⟩
instance : Pow (AdicCompletion I R) ℕ where
pow x n := ⟨x.val ^ n, fun hmn ↦ by simp [x.property, transitionMap_map_pow I hmn]⟩
instance : CommRing (AdicCompletion I R) :=
| let f : AdicCompletion I R → ∀ n, R ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Ideal R) := Subtype.val
Subtype.val_injective.commRing f rfl rfl
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdicCompletion/Algebra.lean | 87 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
/-!
# Open sets
## Summary
We define the subtype of open sets in a topological space.
## Main Definitions
### Bundled open sets
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens α` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α`.
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens.IsBasis` is a predicate saying that a set of `Opens`s form a topological
basis.
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens.comap`: preimage of an open set under a continuous map as a `FrameHom`.
- `Homeomorph.opensCongr`: order-preserving equivalence between open sets in the domain and the
codomain of a homeomorphism.
### Bundled open neighborhoods
- `TopologicalSpace.OpenNhdsOf x` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α` containing
`x : α`.
- `TopologicalSpace.OpenNhdsOf.comap f x U` is the preimage of open neighborhood `U` of `f x` under
`f : C(α, β)`.
## Main results
We define order structures on both `Opens α` (`CompleteLattice`, `Frame`) and `OpenNhdsOf x`
(`OrderTop`, `DistribLattice`).
## TODO
- Rename `TopologicalSpace.Opens` to `Open`?
- Port the `auto_cases` tactic version (as a plugin if the ported `auto_cases` will allow plugins).
-/
open Filter Function Order Set
open Topology
variable {ι α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- The type of open subsets of a topological space. -/
structure Opens where
/-- The underlying set of a bundled `TopologicalSpace.Opens` object. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The `TopologicalSpace.Opens.carrier _` is an open set. -/
is_open' : IsOpen carrier
namespace Opens
instance : SetLike (Opens α) α where
coe := Opens.carrier
coe_injective' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ _ => by congr
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Opens α) (↑) IsOpen :=
⟨fun s h => ⟨⟨s, h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
instance instSecondCountableOpens [SecondCountableTopology α] (U : Opens α) :
SecondCountableTopology U := inferInstanceAs (SecondCountableTopology U.1)
theorem «forall» {p : Opens α → Prop} : (∀ U, p U) ↔ ∀ (U : Set α) (hU : IsOpen U), p ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h _, fun h _ => h _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem carrier_eq_coe (U : Opens α) : U.1 = ↑U := rfl
/-- the coercion `Opens α → Set α` applied to a pair is the same as taking the first component -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {U : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} : ↑(⟨U, hU⟩ : Opens α) = U :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {x : α} {U : Set α} {h : IsOpen U} : x ∈ mk U h ↔ x ∈ U := Iff.rfl
protected theorem nonempty_coeSort {U : Opens α} : Nonempty U ↔ (U : Set α).Nonempty :=
Set.nonempty_coe_sort
-- TODO: should this theorem be proved for a `SetLike`?
protected theorem nonempty_coe {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ U :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext] -- TODO: replace with `∀ x, x ∈ U ↔ x ∈ V`?
theorem ext {U V : Opens α} (h : (U : Set α) = V) : U = V :=
SetLike.coe_injective h
theorem coe_inj {U V : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = V ↔ U = V :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
/-- A version of `Set.inclusion` not requiring definitional abuse -/
abbrev inclusion {U V : Opens α} (h : U ≤ V) : U → V := Set.inclusion h
protected theorem isOpen (U : Opens α) : IsOpen (U : Set α) :=
U.is_open'
@[simp] theorem mk_coe (U : Opens α) : mk (↑U) U.isOpen = U := rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (U : Opens α) : Set α := U
initialize_simps_projections Opens (carrier → coe, as_prefix coe)
/-- The interior of a set, as an element of `Opens`. -/
@[simps]
protected def interior (s : Set α) : Opens α :=
⟨interior s, isOpen_interior⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_interior {s : Set α} {x : α} : x ∈ Opens.interior s ↔ x ∈ _root_.interior s := .rfl
theorem gc : GaloisConnection ((↑) : Opens α → Set α) Opens.interior := fun U _ =>
⟨fun h => interior_maximal h U.isOpen, fun h => le_trans h interior_subset⟩
/-- The galois coinsertion between sets and opens. -/
def gi : GaloisCoinsertion (↑) (@Opens.interior α _) where
choice s hs := ⟨s, interior_eq_iff_isOpen.mp <| le_antisymm interior_subset hs⟩
gc := gc
u_l_le _ := interior_subset
choice_eq _s hs := le_antisymm hs interior_subset
instance : CompleteLattice (Opens α) :=
CompleteLattice.copy (GaloisCoinsertion.liftCompleteLattice gi)
-- le
(fun U V => (U : Set α) ⊆ V) rfl
-- top
⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ (ext interior_univ.symm)
-- bot
⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ rfl
-- sup
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∪ ↑V, U.2.union V.2⟩) rfl
-- inf
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∩ ↑V, U.2.inter V.2⟩)
(funext₂ fun U V => ext (U.2.inter V.2).interior_eq.symm)
-- sSup
(fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isOpen_biUnion fun s _ => s.2⟩)
(funext fun _ => ext sSup_image.symm)
-- sInf
_ rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inf_mk {U V : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} {hV : IsOpen V} :
(⟨U, hU⟩ ⊓ ⟨V, hV⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨U ⊓ V, IsOpen.inter hU hV⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∩ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_inf {s t : Opens α} {x : α} : x ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∪ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Opens α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_bot {x : α} : x ∈ (⊥ : Opens α) ↔ False := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_empty : (⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ : Opens α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = ∅ ↔ U = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_top (x : α) : x ∈ (⊤ : Opens α) := trivial
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Opens α) : Set α) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_univ : (⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ : Opens α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = univ ↔ U = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {S : Set (Opens α)} : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋃ i ∈ S, ↑i :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_sup (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.sup f) : Set α) = s.sup ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_sup (⟨⟨(↑), coe_sup⟩, coe_bot⟩ : SupBotHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_inf (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.inf f) : Set α) = s.inf ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_inf (⟨⟨(↑), coe_inf⟩, coe_top⟩ : InfTopHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
instance : Inhabited (Opens α) := ⟨⊥⟩
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Opens α) where
uniq _ := ext <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Opens α) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨⊥, ⊤, mt coe_inj.2 empty_ne_univ⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ((⨆ i, s i : Opens α) : Set α) = ⋃ i, s i := by
simp [iSup]
theorem iSup_def {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ⨆ i, s i = ⟨⋃ i, s i, isOpen_iUnion fun i => (s i).2⟩ :=
ext <| coe_iSup s
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mk {ι} (s : ι → Set α) (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
(⨆ i, ⟨s i, h i⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨⋃ i, s i, isOpen_iUnion h⟩ :=
iSup_def _
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {ι} {x : α} {s : ι → Opens α} : x ∈ iSup s ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ s i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {Us : Set (Opens α)} {x : α} : x ∈ sSup Us ↔ ∃ u ∈ Us, x ∈ u := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, mem_iSup, exists_prop]
/-- Open sets in a topological space form a frame. -/
def frameMinimalAxioms : Frame.MinimalAxioms (Opens α) where
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s :=
(ext <| by simp only [coe_inf, coe_iSup, coe_sSup, Set.inter_iUnion₂]).le
instance instFrame : Frame (Opens α) := .ofMinimalAxioms frameMinimalAxioms
theorem isOpenEmbedding' (U : Opens α) : IsOpenEmbedding (Subtype.val : U → α) :=
U.isOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal
theorem isOpenEmbedding_of_le {U V : Opens α} (i : U ≤ V) :
IsOpenEmbedding (Set.inclusion <| SetLike.coe_subset_coe.2 i) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion i
isOpen_range := by
rw [Set.range_inclusion i]
exact U.isOpen.preimage continuous_subtype_val
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_bot (U : Opens α) : ¬Set.Nonempty (U : Set α) ↔ U = ⊥ := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_bot, ← Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem ne_bot_iff_nonempty (U : Opens α) : U ≠ ⊥ ↔ Set.Nonempty (U : Set α) := by
rw [Ne, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_bot, not_not]
/-- An open set in the indiscrete topology is either empty or the whole space. -/
theorem eq_bot_or_top {α} [t : TopologicalSpace α] (h : t = ⊤) (U : Opens α) : U = ⊥ ∨ U = ⊤ := by
subst h; letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊤
rw [← coe_eq_empty, ← coe_eq_univ, ← isOpen_top_iff]
exact U.2
instance [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : IsSimpleOrder (Opens α) where
eq_bot_or_eq_top := eq_bot_or_top <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- A set of `opens α` is a basis if the set of corresponding sets is a topological basis. -/
def IsBasis (B : Set (Opens α)) : Prop :=
IsTopologicalBasis (((↑) : _ → Set α) '' B)
theorem isBasis_iff_nbhd {B : Set (Opens α)} :
IsBasis B ↔ ∀ {U : Opens α} {x}, x ∈ U → ∃ U' ∈ B, x ∈ U' ∧ U' ≤ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rintro ⟨sU, hU⟩ x hx
rcases h.mem_nhds_iff.mp (IsOpen.mem_nhds hU hx) with ⟨sV, ⟨⟨V, H₁, H₂⟩, hsV⟩⟩
refine ⟨V, H₁, ?_⟩
cases V
dsimp at H₂
subst H₂
exact hsV
· refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds ?_ ?_
· rintro sU ⟨U, -, rfl⟩
exact U.2
· intro x sU hx hsU
rcases @h ⟨sU, hsU⟩ x hx with ⟨V, hV, H⟩
exact ⟨V, ⟨V, hV, rfl⟩, H⟩
theorem isBasis_iff_cover {B : Set (Opens α)} :
IsBasis B ↔ ∀ U : Opens α, ∃ Us, Us ⊆ B ∧ U = sSup Us := by
constructor
· intro hB U
refine ⟨{ V : Opens α | V ∈ B ∧ V ≤ U }, fun U hU => hU.left, ext ?_⟩
rw [coe_sSup, hB.open_eq_sUnion' U.isOpen]
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, iUnion, mem_setOf_eq, iSup_and, iSup_image]
rfl
· intro h
rw [isBasis_iff_nbhd]
intro U x hx
rcases h U with ⟨Us, hUs, rfl⟩
rcases mem_sSup.1 hx with ⟨U, Us, xU⟩
exact ⟨U, hUs Us, xU, le_sSup Us⟩
/-- If `α` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `α` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem IsBasis.isCompact_open_iff_eq_finite_iUnion {ι : Type*} (b : ι → Opens α)
(hb : IsBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsCompact (b i : Set α)) (U : Set α) :
IsCompact U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Finite ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
apply isCompact_open_iff_eq_finite_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis fun i : ι => (b i).1
· convert (config := {transparency := .default}) hb
ext
simp
· exact hb'
lemma IsBasis.le_iff {α} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α}
{Us : Set (Opens α)} (hUs : @IsBasis α t₂ Us) :
t₁ ≤ t₂ ↔ ∀ U ∈ Us, IsOpen[t₁] U := by
conv_lhs => rw [hUs.eq_generateFrom]
simp [Set.subset_def, le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen]
@[simp]
theorem isCompactElement_iff (s : Opens α) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement s ↔ IsCompact (s : Set α) := by
rw [isCompact_iff_finite_subcover, CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun H ι U hU => ?_⟩
· introv H hU hU'
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := H ι (fun i => ⟨U i, hU i⟩) (by simpa)
refine ⟨t, Set.Subset.trans ht ?_⟩
rw [coe_finset_sup, Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
rfl
| · obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
H (fun i => U i) (fun i => (U i).isOpen) (by simpa using show (s : Set α) ⊆ ↑(iSup U) from hU)
refine ⟨t, Set.Subset.trans ht ?_⟩
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
show ∀ i ∈ t, U i ≤ t.sup U
exact fun i => Finset.le_sup
/-- The preimage of an open set, as an open set. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Sets/Opens.lean | 332 | 339 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
/-!
# Homogeneous Localization
## Notation
- `ι` is a commutative monoid;
- `R` is a commutative semiring;
- `A` is a commutative ring and an `R`-algebra;
- `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A` is the grading of `A`;
- `x : Submonoid A` is a submonoid
## Main definitions and results
This file constructs the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and denominator have the same grading,
i.e. `{a/b ∈ Aₓ | ∃ (i : ι), a ∈ 𝒜ᵢ ∧ b ∈ 𝒜ᵢ}`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg`: a structure with a numerator and denominator field
where they are required to have the same grading.
However `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` cannot have a ring structure for many reasons, for example if `c`
is a `NumDenSameDeg`, then generally, `c + (-c)` is not necessarily `0` for degree reasons ---
`0` is considered to have grade zero (see `deg_zero`) but `c + (-c)` has the same degree as `c`. To
circumvent this, we quotient `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` by the kernel of `c ↦ c.num / c.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding`: for `x : Submonoid A` and any
`c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a denominator of the same degree,
we get an element `c.num / c.den` of `Aₓ`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization`: `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` quotiented by kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.val`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.val` is an element
of `Aₓ`. In another word, one can view `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as a subring of `Aₓ`
through `HomogeneousLocalization.val`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.num : A` is the
numerator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.den : A` is the
denominator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.deg : ι` is the
degree of `f` such that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg` and `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`
(see `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg` and `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`).
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.num_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.den_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.eq_num_div_den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.val : Aₓ` is equal to `f.num / f.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.isLocalRing`: `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is a local ring when `x` is
the complement of some prime ideals.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.map`: Let `A` and `B` be two graded rings and `g : A → B` a grading
preserving ring map. If `P ≤ A` and `Q ≤ B` are submonoids such that `P ≤ g⁻¹(Q)`, then `g`
induces a ring map between the homogeneous localization of `A` at `P` and the homogeneous
localization of `B` at `Q`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
noncomputable section
open DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike
variable {ι R A : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A)
variable (x : Submonoid A)
local notation "at " x => Localization x
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
section
/-- Let `x` be a submonoid of `A`, then `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` is a structure with a numerator and a
denominator with same grading such that the denominator is contained in `x`.
-/
structure NumDenSameDeg where
deg : ι
(num den : 𝒜 deg)
den_mem : (den : A) ∈ x
end
namespace NumDenSameDeg
open SetLike.GradedMonoid Submodule
variable {𝒜}
@[ext]
theorem ext {c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x} (hdeg : c1.deg = c2.deg) (hnum : (c1.num : A) = c2.num)
(hden : (c1.den : A) = c2.den) : c1 = c2 := by
rcases c1 with ⟨i1, ⟨n1, hn1⟩, ⟨d1, hd1⟩, h1⟩
rcases c2 with ⟨i2, ⟨n2, hn2⟩, ⟨d2, hd2⟩, h2⟩
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at *
subst hdeg hnum hden
congr
instance : Neg (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
neg c := ⟨c.deg, ⟨-c.num, neg_mem c.num.2⟩, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (-c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).num : A) = -c.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
instance : SMul α (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
smul m c := ⟨c.deg, m • c.num, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : (m • c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).num : A) = m • c.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
end SMul
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι] [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
instance : One (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one :=
{ deg := 0
-- Porting note: Changed `one_mem` to `GradedOne.one_mem`
num := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.one_mem _ }
@[simp]
theorem deg_one : (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num : A) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Zero (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
zero := ⟨0, 0, ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩, Submonoid.one_mem _⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_zero : ((0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Mul (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
mul p q :=
{ deg := p.deg + q.deg
-- Porting note: Changed `mul_mem` to `GradedMul.mul_mem`
num := ⟨p.num * q.num, GradedMul.mul_mem p.num.prop q.num.prop⟩
den := ⟨p.den * q.den, GradedMul.mul_mem p.den.prop q.den.prop⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ p.den_mem q.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 * c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).num : A) = c1.num * c2.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
instance : Add (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
add c1 c2 :=
{ deg := c1.deg + c2.deg
num := ⟨c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num,
add_mem (GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.num.2)
(add_comm c2.deg c1.deg ▸ GradedMul.mul_mem c2.den.2 c1.num.2)⟩
den := ⟨c1.den * c2.den, GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.den.2⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ c1.den_mem c2.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 + c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
((c1 + c2).num : A) = c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 + c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
instance : CommMonoid (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := ext _ (add_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _)
one_mul _ := ext _ (zero_add _) (one_mul _) (one_mul _)
mul_one _ := ext _ (add_zero _) (mul_one _) (mul_one _)
mul_comm _ _ := ext _ (add_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _)
instance : Pow (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow c n :=
⟨n • c.deg, @GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.num,
@GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.den, by
induction' n with n ih
· simpa only [coe_gnpow, pow_zero] using Submonoid.one_mem _
· simpa only [pow_succ, coe_gnpow] using x.mul_mem ih c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : (c ^ n).deg = n • c.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).num : A) = (c.num : A) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).den : A) = (c.den : A) ^ n :=
rfl
variable (𝒜)
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A` and any `p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a
denominator of the same degree, we get an element `p.num / p.den` of `Aₓ`.
-/
def embedding (p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Localization.mk p.num ⟨p.den, p.den_mem⟩
end NumDenSameDeg
end HomogeneousLocalization
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A`, `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` modulo the
kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`. This is essentially the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and
denominator share the same grading.
-/
def HomogeneousLocalization : Type _ :=
Quotient (Setoid.ker <| HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x)
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
open HomogeneousLocalization HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
variable {𝒜} {x}
/-- Construct an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` from a homogeneous fraction. -/
abbrev mk (y : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x :=
Quotient.mk'' y
lemma mk_surjective : Function.Surjective (mk (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective
/-- View an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as an element of `Aₓ` by forgetting that the
numerator and denominator are of the same grading.
-/
def val (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Quotient.liftOn' y (NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x) fun _ _ => id
@[simp]
theorem val_mk (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
val (mk i) = Localization.mk (i.num : A) ⟨i.den, i.den_mem⟩ :=
rfl
variable (x)
@[ext]
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (HomogeneousLocalization.val (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
fun a b => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' a b fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound' h
variable (𝒜) {x} in
lemma subsingleton (hx : 0 ∈ x) : Subsingleton (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
have := IsLocalization.subsingleton (S := at x) hx
(HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)).subsingleton
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
variable [IsScalarTower α A A]
instance : SMul α (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
smul m := Quotient.map' (m • ·) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_smul, den_smul]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => m • z) h <;> rw [Localization.smul_mk]
@[simp] lemma mk_smul (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : mk (m • i) = m • mk i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_smul (n : α) : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (n • y).val = n • y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ by rw [← mk_smul, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.smul_mk]; rfl
theorem val_nsmul (n : ℕ) (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (n • y).val = n • y.val := by
rw [val_smul, OreLocalization.nsmul_eq_nsmul]
theorem val_zsmul (n : ℤ) (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (n • y).val = n • y.val := by
rw [val_smul, OreLocalization.zsmul_eq_zsmul]
end SMul
instance : Neg (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
neg := Quotient.map' Neg.neg fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_neg, den_neg, ← Localization.neg_mk]
exact congr_arg Neg.neg h
@[simp] lemma mk_neg (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (-i) = -mk i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg {x} : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (-y).val = -y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun y ↦ by rw [← mk_neg, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.neg_mk]; rfl
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι] [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
instance hasPow : Pow (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow z n :=
(Quotient.map' (· ^ n) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_pow, den_pow]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => z ^ n) h <;> rw [Localization.mk_pow] <;> rfl :
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x → HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x)
z
@[simp] lemma mk_pow (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : mk (i ^ n) = mk i ^ n := rfl
instance : Add (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
add :=
Quotient.map₂ (· + ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
| change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_add, den_add, ← Localization.add_mk]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousLocalization.lean | 367 | 368 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Circulant matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about circulant matrices.
Given a vector `v : n → α` indexed by a type that is endowed with subtraction,
`Matrix.circulant v` is the matrix whose `(i, j)`th entry is `v (i - j)`.
## Main results
- `Matrix.circulant`: the circulant matrix generated by a given vector `v : n → α`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul`: the product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul_comm`: multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do.
## Implementation notes
`Matrix.Fin.foo` is the `Fin n` version of `Matrix.foo`.
Namely, the index type of the circulant matrices in discussion is `Fin n`.
## Tags
circulant, matrix
-/
variable {α β n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Function
open Matrix
/-- Given the condition `[Sub n]` and a vector `v : n → α`,
we define `circulant v` to be the circulant matrix generated by `v` of type `Matrix n n α`.
The `(i,j)`th entry is defined to be `v (i - j)`. -/
def circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => v (i - j)
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `circulant`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem circulant_apply [Sub n] (v : n → α) (i j) : circulant v i j = v (i - j) := rfl
theorem circulant_col_zero_eq [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) (i : n) : circulant v i 0 = v i :=
congr_arg v (sub_zero _)
theorem circulant_injective [SubtractionMonoid n] :
Injective (circulant : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) := by
intro v w h
ext k
rw [← circulant_col_zero_eq v, ← circulant_col_zero_eq w, h]
|
theorem Fin.circulant_injective : ∀ n, Injective fun v : Fin n → α => circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_injective
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Circulant.lean | 61 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
/-!
# Quadratic maps
This file defines quadratic maps on an `R`-module `M`, taking values in an `R`-module `N`.
An `N`-valued quadratic map on a module `M` over a commutative ring `R` is a map `Q : M → N` such
that:
* `QuadraticMap.map_smul`: `Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x`
* `QuadraticMap.polar_add_left`, `QuadraticMap.polar_add_right`,
`QuadraticMap.polar_smul_left`, `QuadraticMap.polar_smul_right`:
the map `QuadraticMap.polar Q := fun x y ↦ Q (x + y) - Q x - Q y` is bilinear.
This notion generalizes to commutative semirings using the approach in [izhakian2016][] which
requires that there be a (possibly non-unique) companion bilinear map `B` such that
`∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y`. Over a ring, this `B` is precisely `QuadraticMap.polar Q`.
To build a `QuadraticMap` from the `polar` axioms, use `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`.
Quadratic maps come with a scalar multiplication, `(a • Q) x = a • Q x`,
and composition with linear maps `f`, `Q.comp f x = Q (f x)`.
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`: a more familiar constructor that works on rings
* `QuadraticMap.associated`: associated bilinear map
* `QuadraticMap.PosDef`: positive definite quadratic maps
* `QuadraticMap.Anisotropic`: anisotropic quadratic maps
* `QuadraticMap.discr`: discriminant of a quadratic map
* `QuadraticMap.IsOrtho`: orthogonality of vectors with respect to a quadratic map.
## Main statements
* `QuadraticMap.associated_left_inverse`,
* `QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse`: in a commutative ring where 2 has
an inverse, there is a correspondence between quadratic maps and symmetric
bilinear forms
* `LinearMap.BilinForm.exists_orthogonal_basis`: There exists an orthogonal basis with
respect to any nondegenerate, symmetric bilinear map `B`.
## Notation
In this file, the variable `R` is used when a `CommSemiring` structure is available.
The variable `S` is used when `R` itself has a `•` action.
## Implementation notes
While the definition and many results make sense if we drop commutativity assumptions,
the correct definition of a quadratic maps in the noncommutative setting would require
substantial refactors from the current version, such that $Q(rm) = rQ(m)r^*$ for some
suitable conjugation $r^*$.
The [Zulip thread](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/Quadratic.20Maps/near/395529867)
has some further discussion.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant#Quadratic_forms
## Tags
quadratic map, homogeneous polynomial, quadratic polynomial
-/
universe u v w
variable {S T : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {M N P A : Type*}
open LinearMap (BilinMap BilinForm)
section Polar
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
namespace QuadraticMap
/-- Up to a factor 2, `Q.polar` is the associated bilinear map for a quadratic map `Q`.
Source of this name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form#Generalization
-/
def polar (f : M → N) (x y : M) :=
f (x + y) - f x - f y
protected theorem map_add (f : M → N) (x y : M) :
f (x + y) = f x + f y + polar f x y := by
rw [polar]
abel
theorem polar_add (f g : M → N) (x y : M) : polar (f + g) x y = polar f x y + polar g x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.add_apply]
abel
theorem polar_neg (f : M → N) (x y : M) : polar (-f) x y = -polar f x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.neg_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
theorem polar_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] (f : M → N) (s : S) (x y : M) :
polar (s • f) x y = s • polar f x y := by simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub]
theorem polar_comm (f : M → N) (x y : M) : polar f x y = polar f y x := by
rw [polar, polar, add_comm, sub_sub, sub_sub, add_comm (f x) (f y)]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to express bilinearity of `QuadraticMap.polar` without subtraction. -/
theorem polar_add_left_iff {f : M → N} {x x' y : M} :
polar f (x + x') y = polar f x y + polar f x' y ↔
f (x + x' + y) + (f x + f x' + f y) = f (x + x') + f (x' + y) + f (y + x) := by
simp only [← add_assoc]
simp only [polar, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_sub]
simp only [add_right_comm _ (f y) _, add_right_comm _ (f x') (f x)]
rw [add_comm y x, add_right_comm _ _ (f (x + y)), add_comm _ (f (x + y)),
add_right_comm (f (x + y)), add_left_inj]
theorem polar_comp {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup S] [FunLike F N S] [AddMonoidHomClass F N S]
(f : M → N) (g : F) (x y : M) :
polar (g ∘ f) x y = g (polar f x y) := by
simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, Function.comp_apply, map_sub]
/-- `QuadraticMap.polar` as a function from `Sym2`. -/
def polarSym2 (f : M → N) : Sym2 M → N :=
Sym2.lift ⟨polar f, polar_comm _⟩
@[simp]
lemma polarSym2_sym2Mk (f : M → N) (xy : M × M) : polarSym2 f (.mk xy) = polar f xy.1 xy.2 := rfl
end QuadraticMap
end Polar
/-- A quadratic map on a module.
For a more familiar constructor when `R` is a ring, see `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`. -/
structure QuadraticMap (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (N : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N] where
toFun : M → N
toFun_smul : ∀ (a : R) (x : M), toFun (a • x) = (a * a) • toFun x
exists_companion' : ∃ B : BilinMap R M N, ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y + B x y
section QuadraticForm
variable (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- A quadratic form on a module. -/
abbrev QuadraticForm : Type _ := QuadraticMap R M R
end QuadraticForm
namespace QuadraticMap
section DFunLike
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable {Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (QuadraticMap R M N) M N where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' x y h := by cases x; cases y; congr
variable (Q)
/-- The `simp` normal form for a quadratic map is `DFunLike.coe`, not `toFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : Q.toFun = ⇑Q :=
rfl
-- this must come after the coe_to_fun definition
initialize_simps_projections QuadraticMap (toFun → apply)
variable {Q}
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x : M, Q x = Q' x) : Q = Q' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
theorem congr_fun (h : Q = Q') (x : M) : Q x = Q' x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
/-- Copy of a `QuadraticMap` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : QuadraticMap R M N where
toFun := Q'
toFun_smul := h.symm ▸ Q.toFun_smul
exists_companion' := h.symm ▸ Q.exists_companion'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : ⇑(Q.copy Q' h) = Q' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : Q.copy Q' h = Q :=
DFunLike.ext' h
end DFunLike
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (Q : QuadraticMap R M N)
protected theorem map_smul (a : R) (x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x :=
Q.toFun_smul a x
theorem exists_companion : ∃ B : BilinMap R M N, ∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y :=
Q.exists_companion'
theorem map_add_add_add_map (x y z : M) :
Q (x + y + z) + (Q x + Q y + Q z) = Q (x + y) + Q (y + z) + Q (z + x) := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
rw [add_comm z x]
simp only [h, LinearMap.map_add₂]
abel
theorem map_add_self (x : M) : Q (x + x) = 4 • Q x := by
rw [← two_smul R x, Q.map_smul, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul R]
norm_num
-- not @[simp] because it is superseded by `ZeroHomClass.map_zero`
protected theorem map_zero : Q 0 = 0 := by
rw [← @zero_smul R _ _ _ _ (0 : M), Q.map_smul, zero_mul, zero_smul]
instance zeroHomClass : ZeroHomClass (QuadraticMap R M N) M N :=
{ QuadraticMap.instFunLike (R := R) (M := M) (N := N) with map_zero := QuadraticMap.map_zero }
theorem map_smul_of_tower [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
| [Module S N] [IsScalarTower S R N] (a : S)
(x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Basic.lean | 236 | 237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
/-!
# Characterizations of weak convergence of finite measures and probability measures
This file will provide portmanteau characterizations of the weak convergence of finite measures
and of probability measures, i.e., the standard characterizations of convergence in distribution.
## Main definitions
The topologies of weak convergence on the types of finite measures and probability measures are
already defined in their corresponding files; no substantial new definitions are introduced here.
## Main results
The main result will be the portmanteau theorem providing various characterizations of the
weak convergence of measures (probability measures or finite measures). Given measures μs
and μ on a topological space Ω, the conditions that will be proven equivalent (under quite
general hypotheses) are:
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly.
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
The separate implications are:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto` is the implication (T) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge` is the equivalence (C) ↔ (O).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier` is the implication (O) → (B).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure` is the implication (B) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_of_forall_isOpen_le_liminf` gives the implication (O) → (T) for
any sequence of Borel probability measures.
## Implementation notes
Many of the characterizations of weak convergence hold for finite measures and are proven in that
generality and then specialized to probability measures. Some implications hold with slightly
more general assumptions than in the usual statement of portmanteau theorem. The full portmanteau
theorem, however, is most convenient for probability measures on pseudo-emetrizable spaces with
their Borel sigma algebras.
Some specific considerations on the assumptions in the different implications:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto`, i.e., implication (T) → (C),
assumes that in the underlying topological space, indicator functions of closed sets have
decreasing bounded continuous pointwise approximating sequences. The assumption is in the form
of the type class `HasOuterApproxClosed`. Type class inference knows that for example the more
common assumptions of metrizability or pseudo-emetrizability suffice.
* Where formulations are currently only provided for probability measures, one can obtain the
finite measure formulations using the characterization of convergence of finite measures by
their total masses and their probability-normalized versions, i.e., by
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_normalize_iff_tendsto`.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, convergence in distribution, convergence in law, finite measure,
probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen
/-! ### Portmanteau: limsup condition for closed sets iff liminf condition for open sets
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, the following two conditions are equivalent:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
Either of these will later be shown to be equivalent to the weak convergence of the sequence
of measures.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E) :
μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [liminf_bot, le_top]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.liminf fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.liminf ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_limsup_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ) :
μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
compl_compl E ▸ le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
theorem limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.limsup fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.limsup ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_liminf_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E :=
compl_compl E ▸ limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One pair of implications of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, the following two are equivalent:
(C) The limsup of the measures of any closed set is at most the measure of the closed set
under a candidate limit measure.
(O) The liminf of the measures of any open set is at least the measure of the open set
under a candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] :
(∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F) ↔
∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G := by
constructor
· intro h G G_open
exact le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le
G_open.measurableSet (h Gᶜ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
· intro h F F_closed
exact limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl
F_closed.measurableSet (h Fᶜ (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr F_closed))
end LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen -- section
section TendstoOfNullFrontier
/-! ### Portmanteau: limit of measures of Borel sets whose boundary carries no mass in the limit
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, either of the following equivalent conditions:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
implies that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} {E₀ E E₁ : Set Ω} (E₀_subset : E₀ ⊆ E) (subset_E₁ : E ⊆ E₁)
(nulldiff : μ (E₁ \ E₀) = 0) (h_E₀ : μ E₀ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀)
(h_E₁ : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁) ≤ μ E₁) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
apply tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
· have E₀_ae_eq_E : E₀ =ᵐ[μ] E :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm E₀_subset.eventuallyLE
(subset_E₁.eventuallyLE.trans (ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff))
calc
μ E = μ E₀ := measure_congr E₀_ae_eq_E.symm
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀ := h_E₀
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
liminf_le_liminf (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono E₀_subset)
· have E_ae_eq_E₁ : E =ᵐ[μ] E₁ :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm subset_E₁.eventuallyLE
((ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff).trans E₀_subset.eventuallyLE)
calc
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁ :=
limsup_le_limsup (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono subset_E₁)
_ ≤ μ E₁ := h_E₁
_ = μ E := measure_congr E_ae_eq_E₁.symm
· infer_param
· infer_param
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, if the liminf of the measures of any open set is at
least the measure of the open set under a candidate limit measure, then for any set whose
boundary carries no probability mass under the candidate limit measure, then its measures under the
sequence converge to its measure under the candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G) {E : Set Ω}
(E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F :=
limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge.mpr h_opens
tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le interior_subset subset_closure
E_nullbdry (h_opens _ isOpen_interior) (h_closeds _ isClosed_closure)
end TendstoOfNullFrontier --section
section ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: weak convergence implies a limsup condition for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (T) implies also both
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G);
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of finite measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed set is
at most the measure of the closed set under the limit measure.
-/
theorem FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μs : ι → FiniteMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro ε ε_pos _
have ε_pos' := (ENNReal.half_pos (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr ε_pos.ne.symm)).ne.symm
let fs := F_closed.apprSeq
have key₁ : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ ω, (fs n ω : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) F)) :=
HasOuterApproxClosed.tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq F_closed (μ : Measure Ω)
have room₁ : (μ : Measure Ω) F < (μ : Measure Ω) F + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (measure_lt_top (μ : Measure Ω) F).ne ε_pos'
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp <| key₁.eventually_lt_const room₁
have key₂ := FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mp μs_lim (fs M)
have room₂ :
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) <
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_of_lt ((fs M).lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _)) ε_pos'
have ev_near := key₂.eventually_le_const room₂
have ev_near' := ev_near.mono
(fun n ↦ le_trans (HasOuterApproxClosed.measure_le_lintegral F_closed (μs n) M))
apply (Filter.limsup_le_limsup ev_near').trans
rw [limsup_const]
apply le_trans (add_le_add (hM M rfl.le).le (le_refl (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞)))
simp only [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves, le_refl]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed
set is at most the measure of the closed set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
apply FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
((tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds L).mp μs_lim) F_closed
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the liminf of the measures of any open set
is at least the measure of the open set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{G : Set Ω} (G_open : IsOpen G) :
(μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F :=
fun _ F_closed ↦ limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto μs_lim F_closed
le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le G_open.measurableSet
(h_closeds _ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' {Ω ι : Type*}
{L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
[HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω}
(μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : (μ : Measure Ω) (frontier E) = 0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) E) L (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) E)) :=
haveI h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → (μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
fun _ G_open ↦ le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto μs_lim G_open
tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier h_opens E_nullbdry
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that if the boundary of a Borel set
carries no probability mass under the limit measure, then the limit of the measures of the set
equals the measure of the set under the limit probability measure.
A version with coercions to ordinary `ℝ≥0∞`-valued measures is
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto'`.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have key := tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' μs_lim (by simpa using E_nullbdry)
exact (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal (measure_ne_top (↑μ) E)).comp key
end ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE --section
section LimitBorelImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: limit condition for Borel sets implies limsup for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B)
implies
| (C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (B) implies also
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Portmanteau.lean | 360 | 367 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ClassGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Group law on Weierstrass curves
This file proves that the nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve form an abelian group
under the geometric group law defined in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` given by a Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0` in
affine coordinates. As in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`, the set of
nonsingular rational points `W⟮F⟯` of `W` consist of the unique point at infinity `𝓞` and
nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. With this description, there is an addition-preserving injection
between `W⟮F⟯` and the ideal class group of the *affine coordinate ring*
`F[W] := F[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of `W`. This is given by mapping `𝓞` to the trivial ideal class and a
nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` to the ideal class of the invertible ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩`.
Proving that this is well-defined and preserves addition reduces to equalities of integral ideals
checked in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_neg_mul` and in
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal` via explicit ideal computations.
Now `F[W]` is a free rank two `F[X]`-algebra with basis `{1, Y}`, so every element of `F[W]` is of
the form `p + qY` for some `p, q` in `F[X]`, and there is an algebra norm `N : F[W] → F[X]`.
Injectivity can then be shown by computing the degree of such a norm `N(p + qY)` in two different
ways, which is done in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis` and in the
auxiliary lemmas in the proof of `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing`: the coordinate ring `F[W]` of a Weierstrass curve `W`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.basis`: the power basis of `F[W]` over `F[X]`.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.instIsDomainCoordinateRing`: the affine coordinate ring
of a Weierstrass curve is an integral domain.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis`: the degree of the norm of an
element in the affine coordinate ring in terms of its power basis.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`: the type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine
coordinates forms an abelian group under addition.
## References
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol268-itp2023/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6.pdf
## Tags
elliptic curve, group law, class group
-/
open Ideal Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow])
universe u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve.Affine
/-! ## Weierstrass curves in affine coordinates -/
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : Affine R) (f : R →+* S)
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, this is a `def` under a `derive comm_ring` tag.
-- This generates a reducible instance of `comm_ring` for `coordinate_ring`. In certain
-- circumstances this might be extremely slow, because all instances in its definition are unified
-- exponentially many times. In this case, one solution is to manually add the local attribute
-- `local attribute [irreducible] coordinate_ring.comm_ring` to block this type-level unification.
-- In Lean 4, this is no longer an issue and is now an `abbrev`. See Zulip thread:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/.E2.9C.94.20class_group.2Emk
/-- The affine coordinate ring `R[W] := R[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev CoordinateRing : Type u :=
AdjoinRoot W.polynomial
/-- The function field `R(W) := Frac(R[W])` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev FunctionField : Type u :=
FractionRing W.CoordinateRing
namespace CoordinateRing
section Algebra
/-! ### The coordinate ring as an `R[X]`-algebra -/
noncomputable instance : Algebra R W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R
noncomputable instance : Algebra R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R[X]
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.isScalarTower R R[X] _
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton W.CoordinateRing :=
Module.subsingleton R[X] _
/-- The natural ring homomorphism mapping `R[X][Y]` to `R[W]`. -/
noncomputable abbrev mk : R[X][Y] →+* W.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.mk W.polynomial
/-- The power basis `{1, Y}` for `R[W]` over `R[X]`. -/
protected noncomputable def basis : Basis (Fin 2) R[X] W.CoordinateRing := by
classical exact (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).by_cases (fun _ => default) fun _ =>
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).basis.reindex <| finCongr W.natDegree_polynomial
lemma basis_apply (n : Fin 2) :
CoordinateRing.basis W n = (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).gen ^ (n : ℕ) := by
classical
nontriviality R
rw [CoordinateRing.basis, Or.by_cases, dif_neg <| not_subsingleton R, Basis.reindex_apply,
PowerBasis.basis_eq_pow]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma basis_zero : CoordinateRing.basis W 0 = 1 := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_zero _
@[simp]
lemma basis_one : CoordinateRing.basis W 1 = mk W Y := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_one _
lemma coe_basis : (CoordinateRing.basis W : Fin 2 → W.CoordinateRing) = ![1, mk W Y] := by
ext n
fin_cases n
exacts [basis_zero W, basis_one W]
variable {W} in
lemma smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) : x • y = mk W (C x) * y :=
(algebraMap_smul W.CoordinateRing x y).symm
variable {W} in
lemma smul_basis_eq_zero {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = 0) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 := by
have h := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.mp (CoordinateRing.basis W).linearIndependent ![p, q]
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, basis_zero, Fin.sum_univ_one, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨h hpq 0, h hpq 1⟩
variable {W} in
lemma exists_smul_basis_eq (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
∃ p q : R[X], p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = x := by
have h := (CoordinateRing.basis W).sum_equivFun x
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_one, basis_zero, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
lemma smul_basis_mul_C (y : R[X]) (p q : R[X]) :
(p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W (C y) =
(p * y) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + (q * y) • mk W Y := by
simp only [smul, map_mul]
ring1
lemma smul_basis_mul_Y (p q : R[X]) : (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W Y =
(q * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) +
(p - q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)) • mk W Y := by
have Y_sq : mk W Y ^ 2 =
mk W (C (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) * Y) := by
exact AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [polynomial]; ring1⟩
simp only [smul, add_mul, mul_assoc, ← sq, Y_sq, C_sub, map_sub, C_mul, map_mul]
ring1
/-- The ring homomorphism `R[W] →+* S[W.map f]` induced by a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`. -/
noncomputable def map : W.CoordinateRing →+* (W.map f).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.lift ((AdjoinRoot.of _).comp <| mapRingHom f)
((AdjoinRoot.root (WeierstrassCurve.map W f).toAffine.polynomial)) <| by
rw [← eval₂_map, ← map_polynomial, AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root]
lemma map_mk (x : R[X][Y]) : map W f (mk W x) = mk (W.map f) (x.map <| mapRingHom f) := by
rw [map, AdjoinRoot.lift_mk, ← eval₂_map]
exact AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq <| x.map <| mapRingHom f
variable {W} in
protected lemma map_smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) :
map W f (x • y) = x.map f • map W f y := by
rw [smul, map_mul, map_mk, map_C, smul]
rfl
variable {f} in
lemma map_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective <| map W f :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr fun y hy => by
obtain ⟨p, q, rfl⟩ := exists_smul_basis_eq y
simp_rw [map_add, CoordinateRing.map_smul, map_one, map_mk, map_X] at hy
obtain ⟨hp, hq⟩ := smul_basis_eq_zero hy
rw [Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff hf] at hp hq
simp_rw [hp, hq, zero_smul, add_zero]
instance [IsDomain R] : IsDomain W.CoordinateRing :=
have : IsDomain (W.map <| algebraMap R <| FractionRing R).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.isDomain_of_prime irreducible_polynomial.prime
(map_injective W <| IsFractionRing.injective R <| FractionRing R).isDomain
end Algebra
section Ring
/-! ### Ideals in the coordinate ring over a ring -/
/-- The class of the element `X - x` in `R[W]` for some `x` in `R`. -/
noncomputable def XClass (x : R) : W.CoordinateRing :=
mk W <| C <| X - C x
lemma XClass_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (x : R) : XClass W x ≠ 0 :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt W.monic_polynomial (C_ne_zero.mpr <| X_sub_C_ne_zero x) <|
by rw [natDegree_polynomial, natDegree_C]; norm_num1
/-- The class of the element `Y - y(X)` in `R[W]` for some `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def YClass (y : R[X]) : W.CoordinateRing :=
mk W <| Y - C y
lemma YClass_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (y : R[X]) : YClass W y ≠ 0 :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt W.monic_polynomial (X_sub_C_ne_zero y) <|
by rw [natDegree_polynomial, natDegree_X_sub_C]; norm_num1
lemma C_addPolynomial (x y L : R) : mk W (C <| W.addPolynomial x y L) =
mk W ((Y - C (linePolynomial x y L)) * (W.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x y L))) :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [W.C_addPolynomial, add_sub_cancel_left, mul_one]⟩
/-- The ideal `⟨X - x⟩` of `R[W]` for some `x` in `R`. -/
noncomputable def XIdeal (x : R) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {XClass W x}
/-- The ideal `⟨Y - y(X)⟩` of `R[W]` for some `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def YIdeal (y : R[X]) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {YClass W y}
/-- The ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y(X)⟩` of `R[W]` for some `x` in `R` and `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def XYIdeal (x : R) (y : R[X]) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {XClass W x, YClass W y}
lemma XYIdeal_eq₁ (x y L : R) : XYIdeal W x (C y) = XYIdeal W x (linePolynomial x y L) := by
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, linePolynomial]
rw [← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| -L, ← map_mul, ← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
C_simp
ring1
lemma XYIdeal_add_eq (x₁ x₂ y₁ L : R) : XYIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ L) (C <| W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ L) =
span {mk W <| W.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ L)} ⊔ XIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ L) := by
simp only [XYIdeal, XIdeal, XClass, YClass, addY, negAddY, negY, negPolynomial, linePolynomial]
rw [sub_sub <| -(Y : R[X][Y]), neg_sub_left (Y : R[X][Y]), map_neg, span_singleton_neg, sup_comm,
← span_insert, ← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| W.a₁ + L, ← map_mul,
← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
C_simp
ring1
/-- The `R`-algebra isomorphism from `R[W] / ⟨X - x, Y - y(X)⟩` to `R` obtained by evaluation at
some `y(X)` in `R[X]` and at some `x` in `R` provided that `W(x, y(x)) = 0`. -/
noncomputable def quotientXYIdealEquiv {x : R} {y : R[X]} (h : (W.polynomial.eval y).eval x = 0) :
(W.CoordinateRing ⧸ XYIdeal W x y) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
((quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, ← Set.image_pair, ← map_span]; rfl).trans <|
DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLEₐ R <| (span_singleton_le_iff_mem _).mpr <|
mem_span_C_X_sub_C_X_sub_C_iff_eval_eval_eq_zero.mpr h).trans
quotientSpanCXSubCXSubCAlgEquiv
end Ring
section Field
/-! ### Ideals in the coordinate ring over a field -/
variable {F : Type u} [Field F] {W : Affine F}
lemma C_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
mk W (C <| W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-(XClass W x₁ * XClass W x₂ * XClass W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)) :=
congr_arg (mk W) <| W.C_addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy
lemma XYIdeal_eq₂ {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
XYIdeal W x₂ (C y₂) = XYIdeal W x₂ (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
have hy₂ : y₂ = (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂).eval x₂ := by
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
field_simp [linePolynomial, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy]
· field_simp [linePolynomial, slope_of_X_ne hx, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx]
ring1
nth_rw 1 [hy₂]
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, linePolynomial]
rw [← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| -W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂, ← map_mul,
← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
lemma XYIdeal_neg_mul {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
XYIdeal W x (C <| W.negY x y) * XYIdeal W x (C y) = XIdeal W x := by
have Y_rw : (Y - C (C y)) * (Y - C (C <| W.negY x y)) -
C (X - C x) * (C (X ^ 2 + C (x + W.a₂) * X + C (x ^ 2 + W.a₂ * x + W.a₄)) - C (C W.a₁) * Y) =
W.polynomial * 1 := by
linear_combination (norm := (rw [negY, polynomial]; C_simp; ring1))
congr_arg C (congr_arg C ((equation_iff ..).mp h.left).symm)
simp_rw [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, span_pair_mul_span_pair, mul_comm, ← map_mul,
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, Y_rw⟩, map_mul, span_insert,
← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Ideal.mul_sup, ← span_insert]
convert mul_top (_ : Ideal W.CoordinateRing) using 2
simp_rw [← Set.image_singleton (f := mk W), ← Set.image_insert_eq, ← map_span]
convert map_top (R := F[X][Y]) (mk W) using 1
apply congr_arg
simp_rw [eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_insert', mem_span_singleton']
rcases ((nonsingular_iff' ..).mp h).right with hx | hy
· let W_X := W.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x + W.a₄)
refine
⟨C <| C W_X⁻¹ * -(X + C (2 * x + W.a₂)), C <| C <| W_X⁻¹ * W.a₁, 0, C <| C <| W_X⁻¹ * -1, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hx]
simp only [W_X, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx]
C_simp
ring1
· let W_Y := 2 * y + W.a₁ * x + W.a₃
refine ⟨0, C <| C W_Y⁻¹, C <| C <| W_Y⁻¹ * -1, 0, ?_⟩
rw [negY, ← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hy]
simp only [W_Y, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy]
C_simp
ring1
private lemma XYIdeal'_mul_inv {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
XYIdeal W x (C y) * (XYIdeal W x (C <| W.negY x y) *
(XIdeal W x : FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul, mul_comm <| XYIdeal W .., XYIdeal_neg_mul h,
XIdeal, FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv W.FunctionField <| XClass_ne_zero W x]
lemma XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
XIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) * (XYIdeal W x₁ (C y₁) * XYIdeal W x₂ (C y₂)) =
YIdeal W (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) *
XYIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
(C <| W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
have sup_rw : ∀ a b c d : Ideal W.CoordinateRing, a ⊔ (b ⊔ (c ⊔ d)) = a ⊔ d ⊔ b ⊔ c :=
fun _ _ c _ => by rw [← sup_assoc, sup_comm c, sup_sup_sup_comm, ← sup_assoc]
rw [XYIdeal_add_eq, XIdeal, mul_comm, XYIdeal_eq₁ W x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂, XYIdeal,
XYIdeal_eq₂ h₁ h₂ hxy, XYIdeal, span_pair_mul_span_pair]
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_rw, Ideal.sup_mul, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr <| C_addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy, span_singleton_neg,
C_addPolynomial, map_mul, YClass]
simp_rw [mul_comm <| XClass W x₁, mul_assoc, ← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Ideal.mul_sup]
rw [span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← span_insert,
← span_pair_add_mul_right <| -(XClass W <| W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂), mul_neg,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_mul, ← map_sub <| mk W, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, span_insert,
← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← sup_rw, ← Ideal.sup_mul, ← Ideal.sup_mul]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _)
convert top_mul (_ : Ideal W.CoordinateRing)
simp_rw [XClass, ← Set.image_singleton (f := mk W), ← map_span, ← Ideal.map_sup, eq_top_iff_one,
mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ AdjoinRoot.mk_surjective, ← span_insert, mem_span_insert',
mem_span_singleton']
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
let y := (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) ^ 2
replace hxy := pow_ne_zero 2 <| sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy
refine ⟨1 + C (C <| y⁻¹ * 4) * W.polynomial,
⟨C <| C y⁻¹ * (C 4 * X ^ 2 + C (4 * x₁ + W.b₂) * X + C (4 * x₁ ^ 2 + W.b₂ * x₁ + 2 * W.b₄)),
0, C (C y⁻¹) * (Y - W.negPolynomial), ?_⟩, by
rw [map_add, map_one, map_mul <| mk W, AdjoinRoot.mk_self, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
rw [polynomial, negPolynomial, ← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hxy]
simp only [y, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hxy]
linear_combination (norm := (rw [b₂, b₄, negY]; C_simp; ring1))
-4 * congr_arg C (congr_arg C <| (equation_iff ..).mp h₁)
· replace hx := sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨C <| C (x₁ - x₂)⁻¹, C <| C <| (x₁ - x₂)⁻¹ * -1, 0, ?_⟩, map_one _⟩⟩
rw [← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hx]
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx]
C_simp
ring1
/-- The non-zero fractional ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩` of `F(W)` for some `x` and `y` in `F`. -/
noncomputable def XYIdeal' {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
(FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField)ˣ :=
Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ <| XYIdeal'_mul_inv h
lemma XYIdeal'_eq {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
(XYIdeal' h : FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField) = XYIdeal W x (C y) :=
rfl
lemma mk_XYIdeal'_neg_mul {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' <| (nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h) * ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h) = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul]
exact (ClassGroup.mk_eq_one_of_coe_ideal <| (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul ..).symm.trans <|
FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_inj.mpr <| XYIdeal_neg_mul h).mpr ⟨_, XClass_ne_zero W _, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias mk_XYIdeal'_mul_mk_XYIdeal'_of_Yeq :=
| mk_XYIdeal'_neg_mul
lemma mk_XYIdeal'_mul_mk_XYIdeal' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h₁) * ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h₂) =
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' <| nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy) := by
rw [← map_mul]
exact (ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul ..).symm <|
XYIdeal'_eq _).mpr
⟨_, _, XClass_ne_zero W _, YClass_ne_zero W _, XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal h₁.left h₂.left hxy⟩
end Field
section Norm
/-! ### Norms on the coordinate ring -/
lemma norm_smul_basis (p q : R[X]) :
Algebra.norm R[X] (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) =
p ^ 2 - p * q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) -
q ^ 2 * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) := by
simp_rw [Algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det <| CoordinateRing.basis W, Matrix.det_fin_two,
Algebra.leftMulMatrix_eq_repr_mul, basis_zero, mul_one, basis_one, smul_basis_mul_Y, map_add,
Finsupp.add_apply, map_smul, Finsupp.smul_apply, ← basis_zero, ← basis_one,
Basis.repr_self_apply, if_pos, one_ne_zero, if_false, smul_eq_mul]
ring1
lemma coe_norm_smul_basis (p q : R[X]) :
Algebra.norm R[X] (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) =
mk W ((C p + C q * X) * (C p + C q * (-(Y : R[X][Y]) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)))) :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr
⟨C q ^ 2, by simp only [norm_smul_basis, polynomial]; C_simp; ring1⟩
lemma degree_norm_smul_basis [IsDomain R] (p q : R[X]) :
(Algebra.norm R[X] <| p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y).degree =
max (2 • p.degree) (2 • q.degree + 3) := by
have hdp : (p ^ 2).degree = 2 • p.degree := degree_pow p 2
have hdpq : (p * q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)).degree ≤ p.degree + q.degree + 1 := by
simpa only [degree_mul] using add_le_add_left degree_linear_le (p.degree + q.degree)
have hdq :
(q ^ 2 * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)).degree = 2 • q.degree + 3 := by
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean | 395 | 435 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
exact mod_cast Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [pow_add, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_sum]
gcongr
simp_rw [← div_pow]
rw [geom_sum_eq, div_le_iff_of_neg]
· trans (-1 : ℝ)
· linarith
· simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, div_pow, Nat.cast_succ, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
positivity
· linarith
· linarith
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖exp x - 1‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 1, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by simp [sum_range_succ]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 1 * ((Nat.succ 1 : ℝ) * ((Nat.factorial 1) * (1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ = 2 * ‖x‖ := by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm, add_mul, Nat.factorial]
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1 - x‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp x - 1 - x‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 2, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sum_range_succ_comm, add_assoc, Nat.factorial]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * ((Nat.succ 2 : ℝ) * (Nat.factorial 2 * (2 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * 1 := by gcongr; norm_num [Nat.factorial]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_one]
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
calc ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
_ ≤ (∑ m ∈ range j, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj, sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
refine (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..).trans_eq ?_
congr with i
simp [Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
gcongr
exact Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
lemma norm_exp_le_exp_norm (x : ℂ) : ‖exp x‖ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
convert norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum x 0 using 1 <;> simp
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ _
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr with i hi
· rw [Complex.norm_pow]
· simp
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
rw [← mul_sum]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) := by
congr 1
refine (sum_bij (fun m hm ↦ m + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro a ha
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, zero_le, and_true]
simp only [mem_range] at ha
rwa [← lt_tsub_iff_right]
· intro a ha b hb hab
simpa using hab
· intro b hb
simp only [mem_range, exists_prop]
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range] at hb
refine ⟨b - n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hb.2]
exact hb.1
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hb.2]
· simp
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
gcongr
refine Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg ?_ _
exact norm_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_le := norm_exp_sub_one_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le := norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_abs_sub_sum :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_le_exp_abs := norm_exp_le_exp_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_abs_mul_exp :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex Finset
nonrec theorem exp_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
|exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial| ≤ |x| ^ n * (n.succ / (n.factorial * n)) := by
have hxc : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
convert exp_bound hxc hn using 2 <;>
norm_cast
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Real.exp x ≤ (∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) +
x ^ n * (n + 1) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h3 : |x| = x := by simpa
have h4 : |x| ≤ 1 := by rwa [h3]
have h' := Real.exp_bound h4 hn
rw [h3] at h'
have h'' := (abs_sub_le_iff.1 h').1
have t := sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 h''
simpa [mul_div_assoc] using t
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1| ≤ 2 * |x| := by
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_le (x := x) this
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1 - x| ≤ x ^ 2 := by
rw [← sq_abs]
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le this
/-- A finite initial segment of the exponential series, followed by an arbitrary tail.
For fixed `n` this is just a linear map wrt `r`, and each map is a simple linear function
of the previous (see `expNear_succ`), with `expNear n x r ⟶ exp x` as `n ⟶ ∞`,
for any `r`. -/
noncomputable def expNear (n : ℕ) (x r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) + x ^ n / n.factorial * r
@[simp]
theorem expNear_zero (x r) : expNear 0 x r = r := by simp [expNear]
@[simp]
theorem expNear_succ (n x r) : expNear (n + 1) x r = expNear n x (1 + x / (n + 1) * r) := by
simp [expNear, range_succ, mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, pow_succ, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
theorem expNear_sub (n x r₁ r₂) : expNear n x r₁ -
expNear n x r₂ = x ^ n / n.factorial * (r₁ - r₂) := by
simp [expNear, mul_sub]
theorem exp_approx_end (n m : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (h : |x| ≤ 1) :
|exp x - expNear m x 0| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * ((m + 1) / m) := by
simp only [expNear, mul_zero, add_zero]
convert exp_bound (n := m) h ?_ using 1
· field_simp [mul_comm]
· omega
theorem exp_approx_succ {n} {x a₁ b₁ : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (a₂ b₂ : ℝ)
(e : |1 + x / m * a₂ - a₁| ≤ b₁ - |x| / m * b₂)
(h : |exp x - expNear m x a₂| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * b₂) :
|exp x - expNear n x a₁| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
refine (abs_sub_le _ _ _).trans ((add_le_add_right h _).trans ?_)
subst e₁; rw [expNear_succ, expNear_sub, abs_mul]
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (a := |x| ^ n / ↑(Nat.factorial n))
(le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 e) ?_ using 1
· simp [mul_add, pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, abs_mul, abs_inv, ← pow_abs, mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
· simp [div_nonneg, abs_nonneg]
theorem exp_approx_end' {n} {x a b : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (rm : ℝ) (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |x| ≤ 1) (e : |1 - a| ≤ b - |x| / rm * ((rm + 1) / rm)) :
|exp x - expNear n x a| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b := by
subst er
exact exp_approx_succ _ e₁ _ _ (by simpa using e) (exp_approx_end _ _ _ e₁ h)
theorem exp_1_approx_succ_eq {n} {a₁ b₁ : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (en : n + 1 = m) {rm : ℝ} (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |exp 1 - expNear m 1 ((a₁ - 1) * rm)| ≤ |1| ^ m / m.factorial * (b₁ * rm)) :
|exp 1 - expNear n 1 a₁| ≤ |1| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
subst er
refine exp_approx_succ _ en _ _ ?_ h
field_simp [show (m : ℝ) ≠ 0 by norm_cast; omega]
theorem exp_approx_start (x a b : ℝ) (h : |exp x - expNear 0 x a| ≤ |x| ^ 0 / Nat.factorial 0 * b) :
|exp x - a| ≤ b := by simpa using h
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x < 1 / (1 - x) := by
have H : 0 < 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := calc
0 < x ^ 3 := by positivity
_ = 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := by ring
calc
exp x ≤ _ := exp_bound' h1.le h2.le zero_lt_three
_ ≤ 1 + x + x ^ 2 := by
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [Finset.sum] <;> nlinarith`
-- This proof should be restored after the norm_num plugin for big operators is ported.
-- (It may also need the positivity extensions in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3907.)
rw [show 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 from rfl]
repeat rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
norm_num [Nat.factorial]
nlinarith
_ < 1 / (1 - x) := by rw [lt_div_iff₀] <;> nlinarith
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x ≤ 1 / (1 - x) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with (rfl | h1)
· simp
· exact (exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' h1 h2).le
theorem add_one_lt_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x + 1 < Real.exp x := by
obtain hx | hx := hx.symm.lt_or_lt
· exact add_one_lt_exp_of_pos hx
obtain h' | h' := le_or_lt 1 (-x)
· linarith [x.exp_pos]
have hx' : 0 < x + 1 := by linarith
simpa [add_comm, exp_neg, inv_lt_inv₀ (exp_pos _) hx']
using exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' (neg_pos.2 hx) h'
theorem add_one_le_exp (x : ℝ) : x + 1 ≤ Real.exp x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
· exact (add_one_lt_exp hx).le
lemma one_sub_lt_exp_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : 1 - x < exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_lt <| add_one_lt_exp <| neg_ne_zero.2 hx
lemma one_sub_le_exp_neg (x : ℝ) : 1 - x ≤ exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_le <| add_one_le_exp _
theorem one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg {n : ℕ} {t : ℝ} (ht' : t ≤ n) : (1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ exp (-t) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rwa [Nat.cast_zero] at ht'
calc
(1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ rexp (-(t / n)) ^ n := by
gcongr
· exact sub_nonneg.2 <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ht' n.cast_nonneg
· exact one_sub_le_exp_neg _
_ = rexp (-t) := by rw [← Real.exp_nat_mul, mul_neg, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀]; positivity
lemma le_inv_mul_exp (x : ℝ) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) : x ≤ c⁻¹ * exp (c * x) := by
rw [le_inv_mul_iff₀ hc]
calc c * x
_ ≤ c * x + 1 := le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
_ ≤ _ := Real.add_one_le_exp (c * x)
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Real.exp` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.exp _]
def evalExp : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.exp $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.exp_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.exp"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Complex
@[simp]
theorem norm_exp_ofReal (x : ℝ) : ‖exp x‖ = Real.exp x := by
rw [← ofReal_exp]
exact Complex.norm_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (Real.exp_pos _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_ofReal := norm_exp_ofReal
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 944 | 945 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
/-!
# The `arctan` function.
Inequalities, identities and `Real.tan` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)`
and the whole line.
The result of `arctan x + arctan y` is given by `arctan_add`, `arctan_add_eq_add_pi` or
`arctan_add_eq_sub_pi` depending on whether `x * y < 1` and `0 < x`. As an application of
`arctan_add` we give four Machin-like formulas (linear combinations of arctangents equal to
`π / 4 = arctan 1`), including John Machin's original one at
`four_mul_arctan_inv_5_sub_arctan_inv_239`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
exact continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun x => id
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
theorem continuousOn_tan_Ioo : ContinuousOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
refine ContinuousOn.mono continuousOn_tan fun x => ?_
simp only [and_imp, mem_Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [cos_eq_zero_iff]
rintro hx_gt hx_lt ⟨r, hxr_eq⟩
rcases le_or_lt 0 r with h | h
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_lt
refine hx_lt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
simp [h]
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_gt
refine hx_gt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
have hr_le : r ≤ -1 := by rwa [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right] at h
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm, ← le_div_iff₀]
· norm_num
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg]; norm_cast
· exact zero_lt_two
theorem surjOn_tan : SurjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) univ :=
have := neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos
continuousOn_tan_Ioo.surjOn_of_tendsto (nonempty_Ioo.2 this)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot this]; exact tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop this]; exact tendsto_tan_pi_div_two)
theorem tan_surjective : Function.Surjective tan := fun _ => surjOn_tan.subset_range trivial
theorem image_tan_Ioo : tan '' Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) = univ :=
| univ_subset_iff.1 surjOn_tan
/-- `Real.tan` as an `OrderIso` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)` and `ℝ`. -/
def tanOrderIso : Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o ℝ :=
(strictMonoOn_tan.orderIso _ _).trans <|
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 89 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Action
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Constructions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Caratheodory
/-!
# Induced Outer Measure
We can extend a function defined on a subset of `Set α` to an outer measure.
The underlying function is called `extend`, and the measure it induces is called
`inducedOuterMeasure`.
Some lemmas below are proven twice, once in the general case, and one where the function `m`
is only defined on measurable sets (i.e. when `P = MeasurableSet`). In the latter cases, we can
remove some hypotheses in the statement. The general version has the same name, but with a prime
at the end.
## Tags
outer measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open OuterMeasure
section Extend
variable {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variable (m : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- We can trivially extend a function defined on a subclass of objects (with codomain `ℝ≥0∞`)
to all objects by defining it to be `∞` on the objects not in the class. -/
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ h : P s, m s h
theorem extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h := by simp [extend, h]
theorem extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ := by simp [extend, h]
theorem smul_extend {R} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c • extend m = extend fun s h => c • m s h := by
| classical
ext1 s
dsimp [extend]
by_cases h : P s
· simp [h]
· simp [h, ENNReal.smul_top, hc]
theorem le_extend {s : α} (h : P s) : m s h ≤ extend m s := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Induced.lean | 55 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`MonoidHom` (resp., `AddMonoidHom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
This file also defines the lesser-used (and notation-less) homomorphism types which are used as
building blocks for other homomorphisms:
* `ZeroHom`
* `OneHom`
* `AddHom`
* `MulHom`
## Notations
* `→+`: Bundled `AddMonoid` homs. Also use for `AddGroup` homs.
* `→*`: Bundled `Monoid` homs. Also use for `Group` homs.
* `→ₙ+`: Bundled `AddSemigroup` homs.
* `→ₙ*`: Bundled `Semigroup` homs.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `GroupHom` -- the idea is that `MonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `MonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `MonoidHom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `MonoidHom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `Deprecated/Group`.
## Tags
MonoidHom, AddMonoidHom
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β M N P : Type*}
-- monoids
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
-- groups
variable {F : Type*}
-- homs
section Zero
/-- `ZeroHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve zero.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ZeroHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [ZeroHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `ZeroHomClass`.
-/
structure ZeroHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
protected map_zero' : toFun 0 = 0
/-- `ZeroHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of zero-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `ZeroHom`.
-/
class ZeroHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] [FunLike F M N] :
Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
map_zero : ∀ f : F, f 0 = 0
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Zero
section Add
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve addition. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `AddHom` is a non-unital additive monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : AddHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddHomClass`.
-/
structure AddHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Add M] [Add N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
protected map_add' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` denotes the type of addition-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ+ " => AddHom
/-- `AddHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `AddHom`.
-/
class AddHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Add M] [Add N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
map_add : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Add
section add_zero
/-- `M →+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `AddZeroClass` structure.
`AddMonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →+ N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddMonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddMonoidHomClass`.
-/
structure AddMonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] extends
ZeroHom M N, AddHom M N
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `M →+ N` denotes the type of additive monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →+ " => AddMonoidHom
/-- `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `AddZeroClass`-preserving
homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `AddMonoidHom`.
-/
class AddMonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*)
[AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M N, ZeroHomClass F M N
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end add_zero
section One
variable [One M] [One N]
/-- `OneHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve one.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : OneHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `OneHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure OneHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [One M] [One N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
protected map_one' : toFun 1 = 1
/-- `OneHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of one-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `OneHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class OneHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [One M] [One N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
map_one : ∀ f : F, f 1 = 1
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.funLike : FunLike (OneHom M N) M N where
coe := OneHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.oneHomClass : OneHomClass (OneHom M N) M N where
map_one := OneHom.map_one'
library_note "low priority simp lemmas"
/--
The hom class hierarchy allows for a single lemma, such as `map_one`, to apply to a large variety
of morphism types, so long as they have an instance of `OneHomClass`. For example, this applies to
to `MonoidHom`, `RingHom`, `AlgHom`, `StarAlgHom`, as well as their `Equiv` variants, etc. However,
precisely because these lemmas are so widely applicable, they keys in the `simp` discrimination tree
are necessarily highly non-specific. For example, the key for `map_one` is
`@DFunLike.coe _ _ _ _ _ 1`.
Consequently, whenever lean sees `⇑f 1`, for some `f : F`, it will attempt to synthesize a
`OneHomClass F ?A ?B` instance. If no such instance exists, then Lean will need to traverse (almost)
the entirety of the `FunLike` hierarchy in order to determine this because so many classes have a
`OneHomClass` instance (in fact, this problem is likely worse for `ZeroHomClass`). This can lead to
a significant performance hit when `map_one` fails to apply.
To avoid this problem, we mark these widely applicable simp lemmas with key discimination tree keys
with `low` priority in order to ensure that they are not tried first.
-/
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f 1 = 1 :=
OneHomClass.map_one f
@[to_additive] lemma map_comp_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f ∘ (1 : ι → M) = 1 := by simp
/-- In principle this could be an instance, but in practice it causes performance issues. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem Subsingleton.of_oneHomClass [Subsingleton M] [OneHomClass F M N] :
Subsingleton F where
allEq f g := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (OneHom M N) := .of_oneHomClass
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_one_iff [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f)
{x : M} :
f x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := hf.eq_iff' (map_one f)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_ne_one_iff {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} : f x ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 := (map_eq_one_iff f hf).not
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_map {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S]
{f : F} {x : R} (hx : f x ≠ 1) : x ≠ 1 := ne_of_apply_ne f <| (by rwa [(map_one f)])
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OneHomClass F M N` into an actual
`OneHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `OneHom M N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `ZeroHomClass F M N` into an actual
`ZeroHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `ZeroHom M N`."]
def OneHomClass.toOneHom [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : OneHom M N where
toFun := f
map_one' := map_one f
/-- Any type satisfying `OneHomClass` can be cast into `OneHom` via `OneHomClass.toOneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `ZeroHomClass` can be cast into `ZeroHom` via
`ZeroHomClass.toZeroHom`. "]
instance [OneHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (OneHom M N) :=
⟨OneHomClass.toOneHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_coe [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) :
((f : OneHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end One
section Mul
variable [Mul M] [Mul N]
/-- `M →ₙ* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve multiplication. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `MulHom` is a non-unital monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →ₙ* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MulHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MulHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
protected map_mul' : ∀ x y, toFun (x * y) = toFun x * toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ* N` denotes the type of multiplication-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ* " => MulHom
/-- `MulHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `MulHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class MulHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
map_mul : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y
@[to_additive]
instance MulHom.funLike : FunLike (M →ₙ* N) M N where
coe := MulHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
/-- `MulHom` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms -/
@[to_additive "`AddHom` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms"]
instance MulHom.mulHomClass : MulHomClass (M →ₙ* N) M N where
map_mul := MulHom.map_mul'
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (x y : M) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
MulHomClass.map_mul f x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (g h : ι → M) : f ∘ (g * h) = f ∘ g * f ∘ h := by
ext; simp
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MulHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddHomClass F M N` into an actual
`AddHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ+ N`."]
def MulHomClass.toMulHom [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul f
/-- Any type satisfying `MulHomClass` can be cast into `MulHom` via `MulHomClass.toMulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddHomClass` can be cast into `AddHom` via
`AddHomClass.toAddHom`."]
instance [MulHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →ₙ* N) :=
⟨MulHomClass.toMulHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_coe [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : MulHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end Mul
section mul_one
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
/-- `M →* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `Monoid` structure.
`MonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MonoidHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] extends
OneHom M N, M →ₙ* N
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toOneHom
/-- `M →* N` denotes the type of monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →* " => MonoidHom
/-- `MonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `Monoid`-preserving homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
[FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends MulHomClass F M N, OneHomClass F M N
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instFunLike : FunLike (M →* N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
apply DFunLike.coe_injective'
exact h
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (M →* N) M N where
map_mul := MonoidHom.map_mul'
map_one f := f.toOneHom.map_one'
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (M →* N) := .of_oneHomClass
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MonoidHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` into an
actual `MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →+ N`."]
def MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →* N :=
{ (f : M →ₙ* N), (f : OneHom M N) with }
/-- Any type satisfying `MonoidHomClass` can be cast into `MonoidHom` via
`MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `AddMonoidHom` via
`AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom`."]
instance [MonoidHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →* N) :=
⟨MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_coe [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : M →* N) : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_eq_one [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) :
f a * f b = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul, h, map_one]
variable [FunLike F G H]
@[to_additive]
theorem map_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (a b : G) : f (a / b) = f a / f b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, hf]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (g h : ι → G) : f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by
ext; simp [map_div' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve inverse.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve negation."]
theorem map_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (a : G) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| map_mul_eq_one f <| inv_mul_cancel _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) :
f ∘ g⁻¹ = (f ∘ g)⁻¹ := by ext; simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a b : G) :
f (a * b⁻¹) = f a * (f b)⁻¹ := by rw [map_mul, map_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g * h⁻¹) = f ∘ g * (f ∘ h)⁻¹ := by simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
∀ a b, f (a / b) = f a / f b := map_div' _ <| map_inv f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by ext; simp
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)]
theorem map_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a : G) :
∀ n : ℕ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, map_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, map_mul, map_pow f a n]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) (n : ℕ) :
f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, map_pow, zpow_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, hf, map_pow, ← zpow_negSucc]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (g : ι → G) (n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by
ext; simp [map_zpow' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve integer power.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)
"Additive group homomorphisms preserve integer scaling."]
theorem map_zpow [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (g : G) (n : ℤ) : f (g ^ n) = f g ^ n := map_zpow' f (map_inv f) g n
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_zpow [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G)
(n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by simp
end mul_one
-- completely uninteresting lemmas about coercion to function, that all homs need
section Coes
/-! Bundled morphisms can be down-cast to weaker bundlings -/
attribute [coe] MonoidHom.toOneHom
attribute [coe] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `MonoidHom` down-cast to a `OneHom`, forgetting the multiplicative property. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoidHom` down-cast to a `ZeroHom`, forgetting the additive property"]
instance MonoidHom.coeToOneHom [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Coe (M →* N) (OneHom M N) := ⟨MonoidHom.toOneHom⟩
attribute [coe] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [coe] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
/-- `MonoidHom` down-cast to a `MulHom`, forgetting the 1-preserving property. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoidHom` down-cast to an `AddHom`, forgetting the 0-preserving property."]
instance MonoidHom.coeToMulHom [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Coe (M →* N) (M →ₙ* N) := ⟨MonoidHom.toMulHom⟩
-- these must come after the coe_toFun definitions
initialize_simps_projections ZeroHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddMonoidHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections OneHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections MulHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections MonoidHom (toFun → apply)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_mk [One M] [One N] (f : M → N) (h1) : (OneHom.mk f h1 : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.toFun_eq_coe [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_mk [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N) (hmul) : (MulHom.mk f hmul : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.toFun_eq_coe [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_mk [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f hmul) :
(MonoidHom.mk f hmul : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
(f.toOneHom : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.toMulHom_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
f.toMulHom.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem OneHom.ext [One M] [One N] ⦃f g : OneHom M N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MulHom.ext [Mul M] [Mul N] ⦃f g : M →ₙ* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MonoidHom.ext [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] ⦃f g : M →* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
namespace MonoidHom
variable [Group G]
variable [MulOneClass M]
/-- Makes a group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps -fullyApplied)
"Makes an additive group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves addition."]
def mk' (f : M → G) (map_mul : ∀ a b : M, f (a * b) = f a * f b) : M →* G where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul
map_one' := by rw [← mul_right_cancel_iff, ← map_mul _ 1, one_mul, one_mul]
end MonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.mk_coe [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) (h1) : OneHom.mk f h1 = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.mk_coe [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (hmul) : MulHom.mk f hmul = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.mk_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (hmul) :
MonoidHom.mk f hmul = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
end Coes
/-- Copy of a `OneHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of a `ZeroHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def OneHom.copy [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
OneHom M N where
toFun := f'
map_one' := h.symm ▸ f.map_one'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_copy {_ : One M} {_ : One N} (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.coe_copy_eq {_ : One M} {_ : One N} (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Copy of a `MulHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an `AddHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def MulHom.copy [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f'
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ f.map_mul'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_copy {_ : Mul M} {_ : Mul N} (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.coe_copy_eq {_ : Mul M} {_ : Mul N} (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Copy of a `MonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an `AddMonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def MonoidHom.copy [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : M →* N :=
{ f.toOneHom.copy f' h, f.toMulHom.copy f' h with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_copy {_ : MulOneClass M} {_ : MulOneClass N} (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : (f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.copy_eq {_ : MulOneClass M} {_ : MulOneClass N} (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem OneHom.map_one [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f 1 = 1 :=
f.map_one'
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f 1 = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f 0 = 0`."]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_one [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) : f 1 = 1 :=
f.map_one'
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MulHom.map_mul [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (a b : M) : f (a * b) = f a * f b :=
f.map_mul' a b
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f (a * b) = f a * f b`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f (a + b) = f a + f b`."]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_mul [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (a b : M) :
f (a * b) = f a * f b := f.map_mul' a b
namespace MonoidHom
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a right inverse,
then `f x` has a right inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `IsUnit.map`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a right inverse, then `f x` has a right inverse too."]
theorem map_exists_right_inv (f : F) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, x * y = 1) : ∃ y, f x * y = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
⟨f y, map_mul_eq_one f hy⟩
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a left inverse,
then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `IsUnit.map`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a left inverse, then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see
`IsAddUnit.map`."]
theorem map_exists_left_inv (f : F) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, y * x = 1) : ∃ y, y * f x = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
⟨f y, map_mul_eq_one f hy⟩
end MonoidHom
/-- The identity map from a type with 1 to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from a type with zero to itself."]
def OneHom.id (M : Type*) [One M] : OneHom M M where
toFun x := x
map_one' := rfl
/-- The identity map from a type with multiplication to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from a type with addition to itself."]
def MulHom.id (M : Type*) [Mul M] : M →ₙ* M where
toFun x := x
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
/-- The identity map from a monoid to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from an additive monoid to itself."]
def MonoidHom.id (M : Type*) [MulOneClass M] : M →* M where
toFun x := x
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma OneHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [One M] : (OneHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MulHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [Mul M] : (MulHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MonoidHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] : (MonoidHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
/-- Composition of `OneHom`s as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `ZeroHom`s as a `ZeroHom`."]
def OneHom.comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (hnp : OneHom N P) (hmn : OneHom M N) : OneHom M P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_one' := by simp
/-- Composition of `MulHom`s as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `AddHom`s as an `AddHom`."]
def MulHom.comp [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (hnp : N →ₙ* P) (hmn : M →ₙ* N) : M →ₙ* P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_mul' x y := by simp
/-- Composition of monoid morphisms as a monoid morphism. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid morphisms as an additive monoid morphism."]
def MonoidHom.comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (hnp : N →* P) (hmn : M →* N) :
M →* P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (g : OneHom N P) (f : OneHom M N) :
↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_comp [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) :
↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) : ↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.comp_apply [One M] [One N] [One P] (g : OneHom N P) (f : OneHom M N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.comp_apply [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_apply [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) (x : M) : g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
/-- Composition of monoid homomorphisms is associative. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid homomorphisms is associative."]
theorem OneHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [One M] [One N] [One P] [One Q]
(f : OneHom M N) (g : OneHom N P) (h : OneHom P Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] [Mul Q]
(f : M →ₙ* N) (g : N →ₙ* P) (h : P →ₙ* Q) : (h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
[MulOneClass Q] (f : M →* N) (g : N →* P) (h : P →* Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.cancel_right [One M] [One N] [One P] {g₁ g₂ : OneHom N P} {f : OneHom M N}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => OneHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.cancel_right [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] {g₁ g₂ : N →ₙ* P} {f : M →ₙ* N}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => MulHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.cancel_right [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
{g₁ g₂ : N →* P} {f : M →* N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.cancel_left [One M] [One N] [One P] {g : OneHom N P} {f₁ f₂ : OneHom M N}
(hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => OneHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← OneHom.comp_apply, h, OneHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.cancel_left [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] {g : N →ₙ* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →ₙ* N}
(hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => MulHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← MulHom.comp_apply, h, MulHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.cancel_left [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
{g : N →* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →* N} (hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h, MonoidHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
section
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toOneHom_injective [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Function.Injective (MonoidHom.toOneHom : (M →* N) → OneHom M N) :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := DFunLike.coe) DFunLike.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toMulHom_injective [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Function.Injective (MonoidHom.toMulHom : (M →* N) → M →ₙ* N) :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := DFunLike.coe) DFunLike.coe_injective
end
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.comp_id [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f.comp (OneHom.id M) = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.comp_id [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.comp (MulHom.id M) = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_id [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
f.comp (MonoidHom.id M) = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.id_comp [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : (OneHom.id N).comp f = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.id_comp [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : (MulHom.id N).comp f = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.id_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
(MonoidHom.id N).comp f = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_pow [Monoid M] [Monoid N] (f : M →* N) (a : M) (n : ℕ) :
f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n := map_pow f a n
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid M] [DivInvMonoid N] (f : M →* N)
(hf : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : M) (n : ℤ) :
f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n := map_zpow' f hf a n
/-- Makes a `OneHom` inverse from the bijective inverse of a `OneHom` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Make a `ZeroHom` inverse from the bijective inverse of a `ZeroHom`"]
def OneHom.inverse [One M] [One N]
(f : OneHom M N) (g : N → M)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
OneHom N M :=
{ toFun := g,
map_one' := by rw [← f.map_one, h₁] }
/-- Makes a multiplicative inverse from a bijection which preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Makes an additive inverse from a bijection which preserves addition."]
def MulHom.inverse [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (g : N → M)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : N →ₙ* M where
toFun := g
map_mul' x y :=
calc
g (x * y) = g (f (g x) * f (g y)) := by rw [h₂ x, h₂ y]
_ = g (f (g x * g y)) := by rw [f.map_mul]
_ = g x * g y := h₁ _
/-- If `M` and `N` have multiplications, `f : M →ₙ* N` is a surjective multiplicative map,
and `M` is commutative, then `N` is commutative. -/
@[to_additive
"If `M` and `N` have additions, `f : M →ₙ+ N` is a surjective additive map,
and `M` is commutative, then `N` is commutative."]
theorem Function.Surjective.mul_comm [Mul M] [Mul N] {f : M →ₙ* N}
(is_surj : Function.Surjective f) (is_comm : Std.Commutative (· * · : M → M → M)) :
Std.Commutative (· * · : N → N → N) where
comm := fun a b ↦ by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := is_surj a
obtain ⟨b', hb'⟩ := is_surj b
simp only [← ha', ← hb', ← map_mul]
rw [is_comm.comm]
/-- The inverse of a bijective `MonoidHom` is a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The inverse of a bijective `AddMonoidHom` is an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def MonoidHom.inverse {A B : Type*} [Monoid A] [Monoid B] (f : A →* B) (g : B → A)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) (h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : B →* A :=
{ (f : OneHom A B).inverse g h₁,
(f : A →ₙ* B).inverse g h₁ h₂ with toFun := g }
section End
namespace Monoid
variable (M) [MulOneClass M]
/-- The monoid of endomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "The monoid of endomorphisms.", to_additive_dont_translate]
protected def End := M →* M
namespace End
@[to_additive]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Monoid.End M) M M := MonoidHom.instFunLike
@[to_additive]
instance instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (Monoid.End M) M M := MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass
@[to_additive instOne]
instance instOne : One (Monoid.End M) where one := .id _
@[to_additive instMul]
instance instMul : Mul (Monoid.End M) where mul := .comp
@[to_additive instMonoid]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (Monoid.End M) where
mul := MonoidHom.comp
one := MonoidHom.id M
mul_assoc _ _ _ := MonoidHom.comp_assoc _ _ _
mul_one := MonoidHom.comp_id
one_mul := MonoidHom.id_comp
npow n f := (npowRec n f).copy f^[n] <| by induction n <;> simp [npowRec, *] <;> rfl
npow_succ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective <| Function.iterate_succ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.End M) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_pow]
lemma coe_pow (f : Monoid.End M) (n : ℕ) : (↑(f ^ n) : M → M) = f^[n] := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_one]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : Monoid.End M) : M → M) = id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_mul]
theorem coe_mul (f g) : ((f * g : Monoid.End M) : M → M) = f ∘ g := rfl
end End
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] protected alias coe_one := End.coe_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] protected alias coe_mul := End.coe_mul
end Monoid
end End
/-- `1` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "`0` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `0`."]
instance [One M] [One N] : One (OneHom M N) := ⟨⟨fun _ => 1, rfl⟩⟩
| /-- `1` is the multiplicative homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "`0` is the additive homomorphism sending all elements to `0`"]
instance [Mul M] [MulOneClass N] : One (M →ₙ* N) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => 1, fun _ _ => (one_mul 1).symm⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/Defs.lean | 958 | 961 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Defs
/-!
# Basic kernels
This file contains basic results about kernels in general and definitions of some particular
kernels.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f)`:
kernel `a ↦ Measure.dirac (f a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.id`: the identity kernel, deterministic kernel for
the identity function.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.copy α`: the deterministic kernel that maps `x : α` to
the Dirac measure at `(x, x) : α × α`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.discard α`: the Markov kernel to the type `Unit`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.swap α β`: the deterministic kernel that maps `(x, y)` to
the Dirac measure at `(y, x)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.const α (μβ : measure β)`: constant kernel `a ↦ μβ`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.restrict κ (hs : MeasurableSet s)`: kernel for which the image of
`a : α` is `(κ a).restrict s`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(κ.restrict hs a) = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂(κ a)`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight`: Kernel with value `(κ a).comap f`,
for a measurable embedding `f`. That is, for a measurable set `t : Set β`,
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight κ hf a t = κ a (f '' t)`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.piecewise (hs : MeasurableSet s) κ η`: the kernel equal to `κ`
on the measurable set `s` and to `η` on its complement.
## Main statements
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open MeasureTheory
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {κ : Kernel α β}
namespace Kernel
section Deterministic
/-- Kernel which to `a` associates the dirac measure at `f a`. This is a Markov kernel. -/
noncomputable def deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) : Kernel α β where
toFun a := Measure.dirac (f a)
measurable' := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator (hf hs)
theorem deterministic_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
deterministic f hf a = Measure.dirac (f a) :=
rfl
theorem deterministic_apply' {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : deterministic f hf a s = s.indicator (fun _ => 1) (f a) := by
rw [deterministic]
change Measure.dirac (f a) s = s.indicator 1 (f a)
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
/-- Because of the measurability field in `Kernel.deterministic`, `rw [h]` will not rewrite
`deterministic f hf` to `deterministic g ⋯`. Instead one can do `rw [deterministic_congr h]`. -/
theorem deterministic_congr {f g : α → β} {hf : Measurable f} (h : f = g) :
deterministic f hf = deterministic g (h ▸ hf) := by
conv_lhs => enter [1]; rw [h]
instance isMarkovKernel_deterministic {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
IsMarkovKernel (deterministic f hf) :=
⟨fun a => by rw [deterministic_apply hf]; infer_instance⟩
theorem lintegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac (g a) f]
theorem setLIntegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by
rw [deterministic_apply, setLIntegral_dirac' hf hs]
@[simp]
theorem setLIntegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] (s : Set β) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by
rw [deterministic_apply, setLIntegral_dirac f s]
end Deterministic
section Id
/-- The identity kernel, that maps `x : α` to the Dirac measure at `x`. -/
protected noncomputable
def id : Kernel α α := Kernel.deterministic id measurable_id
instance : IsMarkovKernel (Kernel.id : Kernel α α) := by rw [Kernel.id]; infer_instance
lemma id_apply (a : α) : Kernel.id a = Measure.dirac a := by
rw [Kernel.id, deterministic_apply, id_def]
lemma lintegral_id' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(@Kernel.id α mα a) = f a := by
rw [id_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
lemma lintegral_id [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (a : α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(@Kernel.id α mα a) = f a := by
rw [id_apply, lintegral_dirac]
end Id
section Copy
/-- The deterministic kernel that maps `x : α` to the Dirac measure at `(x, x) : α × α`. -/
noncomputable
def copy (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Kernel α (α × α) :=
Kernel.deterministic (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (measurable_id.prod measurable_id)
instance : IsMarkovKernel (copy α) := by rw [copy]; infer_instance
lemma copy_apply (a : α) : copy α a = Measure.dirac (a, a) := by simp [copy, deterministic_apply]
end Copy
section Discard
/-- The Markov kernel to the `Unit` type. -/
noncomputable
def discard (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Kernel α Unit :=
Kernel.deterministic (fun _ ↦ ()) measurable_const
instance : IsMarkovKernel (discard α) := by rw [discard]; infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma discard_apply (a : α) : discard α a = Measure.dirac () := deterministic_apply _ _
end Discard
section Swap
/-- The deterministic kernel that maps `(x, y)` to the Dirac measure at `(y, x)`. -/
noncomputable
def swap (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] : Kernel (α × β) (β × α) :=
Kernel.deterministic Prod.swap measurable_swap
instance : IsMarkovKernel (swap α β) := by rw [swap]; infer_instance
/-- See `swap_apply'` for a fully applied version of this lemma. -/
lemma swap_apply (ab : α × β) : swap α β ab = Measure.dirac ab.swap := by
rw [swap, deterministic_apply]
/-- See `swap_apply` for a partially applied version of this lemma. -/
lemma swap_apply' (ab : α × β) {s : Set (β × α)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
swap α β ab s = s.indicator 1 ab.swap := by
rw [swap_apply, Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
end Swap
section Const
/-- Constant kernel, which always returns the same measure. -/
def const (α : Type*) {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} (μβ : Measure β) :
Kernel α β where
toFun _ := μβ
measurable' := measurable_const
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (μβ : Measure β) (a : α) : const α μβ a = μβ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma const_zero : const α (0 : Measure β) = 0 := by
ext x s _; simp [const_apply]
lemma const_add (β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace β] (μ ν : Measure α) :
const β (μ + ν) = const β μ + const β ν := by ext; simp
lemma sum_const [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure β) :
Kernel.sum (fun n ↦ const α (μ n)) = const α (Measure.sum μ) := rfl
instance const.instIsFiniteKernel {μβ : Measure β} [IsFiniteMeasure μβ] :
IsFiniteKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨⟨μβ Set.univ, measure_lt_top _ _, fun _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
instance const.instIsSFiniteKernel {μβ : Measure β} [SFinite μβ] :
IsSFiniteKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨fun n ↦ const α (sfiniteSeq μβ n), fun n ↦ inferInstance, by rw [sum_const, sum_sfiniteSeq]⟩
instance const.instIsMarkovKernel {μβ : Measure β} [hμβ : IsProbabilityMeasure μβ] :
IsMarkovKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨fun _ => hμβ⟩
instance const.instIsZeroOrMarkovKernel {μβ : Measure β} [hμβ : IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μβ] :
IsZeroOrMarkovKernel (const α μβ) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_isProbabilityMeasure μβ with rfl | h
· simp only [const_zero]
infer_instance
· infer_instance
lemma isSFiniteKernel_const [Nonempty α] {μβ : Measure β} :
IsSFiniteKernel (const α μβ) ↔ SFinite μβ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.sFinite (Classical.arbitrary α), fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure β} {a : α} :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂const α μ a = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [const_apply]
@[simp]
theorem setLIntegral_const {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure β} {a : α} {s : Set β} :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂const α μ a = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by rw [const_apply]
end Const
/-- In a countable space with measurable singletons, every function `α → MeasureTheory.Measure β`
defines a kernel. -/
def ofFunOfCountable [MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [Countable α]
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → Measure β) : Kernel α β where
toFun := f
measurable' := measurable_of_countable f
section Restrict
variable {s t : Set β}
/-- Kernel given by the restriction of the measures in the image of a kernel to a set. -/
protected noncomputable def restrict (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Kernel α β where
toFun a := (κ a).restrict s
measurable' := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun t ht => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht]
exact Kernel.measurable_coe κ (ht.inter hs)
theorem restrict_apply (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) :
κ.restrict hs a = (κ a).restrict s :=
rfl
theorem restrict_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
κ.restrict hs a t = (κ a) (t ∩ s) := by
rw [restrict_apply κ hs a, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : κ.restrict MeasurableSet.univ = κ := by
ext1 a
rw [Kernel.restrict_apply, Measure.restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_restrict (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ b, f b ∂κ.restrict hs a = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂κ a := by rw [restrict_apply]
@[simp]
theorem setLIntegral_restrict (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞)
(t : Set β) : ∫⁻ b in t, f b ∂κ.restrict hs a = ∫⁻ b in t ∩ s, f b ∂κ a := by
rw [restrict_apply, Measure.restrict_restrict' hs]
instance IsFiniteKernel.restrict (κ : Kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IsFiniteKernel (κ.restrict hs) := by
refine ⟨⟨IsFiniteKernel.bound κ, IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ, fun a => ?_⟩⟩
rw [restrict_apply' κ hs a MeasurableSet.univ]
exact measure_le_bound κ a _
instance IsSFiniteKernel.restrict (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IsSFiniteKernel (κ.restrict hs) := by
refine ⟨⟨fun n => Kernel.restrict (seq κ n) hs, inferInstance, ?_⟩⟩
ext1 a
simp_rw [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ← Measure.restrict_sum _ hs, ← sum_apply, kernel_sum_seq]
end Restrict
section ComapRight
variable {γ : Type*} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : γ → β}
/-- Kernel with value `(κ a).comap f`, for a measurable embedding `f`. That is, for a measurable set
`t : Set β`, `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight κ hf a t = κ a (f '' t)`. -/
noncomputable def comapRight (κ : Kernel α β) (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) : Kernel α γ where
toFun a := (κ a).comap f
measurable' := by
refine Measure.measurable_measure.mpr fun t ht => ?_
have : (fun a => Measure.comap f (κ a) t) = fun a => κ a (f '' t) := by
ext1 a
rw [Measure.comap_apply _ hf.injective _ _ ht]
exact fun s' hs' ↦ hf.measurableSet_image.mpr hs'
rw [this]
exact Kernel.measurable_coe _ (hf.measurableSet_image.mpr ht)
theorem comapRight_apply (κ : Kernel α β) (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) (a : α) :
comapRight κ hf a = Measure.comap f (κ a) :=
rfl
theorem comapRight_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) (a : α) {t : Set γ}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : comapRight κ hf a t = κ a (f '' t) := by
rw [comapRight_apply,
Measure.comap_apply _ hf.injective (fun s => hf.measurableSet_image.mpr) _ ht]
@[simp]
lemma comapRight_id (κ : Kernel α β) : comapRight κ MeasurableEmbedding.id = κ := by
ext _ _ hs; rw [comapRight_apply' _ _ _ hs]; simp
theorem IsMarkovKernel.comapRight (κ : Kernel α β) (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
(hκ : ∀ a, κ a (Set.range f) = 1) : IsMarkovKernel (comapRight κ hf) := by
refine ⟨fun a => ⟨?_⟩⟩
rw [comapRight_apply' κ hf a MeasurableSet.univ]
simp only [Set.image_univ, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Set.setOf_mem_eq]
exact hκ a
instance IsFiniteKernel.comapRight (κ : Kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) : IsFiniteKernel (comapRight κ hf) := by
refine ⟨⟨IsFiniteKernel.bound κ, IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ, fun a => ?_⟩⟩
rw [comapRight_apply' κ hf a .univ]
exact measure_le_bound κ a _
protected instance IsSFiniteKernel.comapRight (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) : IsSFiniteKernel (comapRight κ hf) := by
refine ⟨⟨fun n => comapRight (seq κ n) hf, inferInstance, ?_⟩⟩
ext1 a
rw [sum_apply]
simp_rw [comapRight_apply _ hf]
have :
(Measure.sum fun n => Measure.comap f (seq κ n a)) =
Measure.comap f (Measure.sum fun n => seq κ n a) := by
ext1 t ht
rw [Measure.comap_apply _ hf.injective (fun s' => hf.measurableSet_image.mpr) _ ht,
Measure.sum_apply _ ht, Measure.sum_apply _ (hf.measurableSet_image.mpr ht)]
congr with n : 1
rw [Measure.comap_apply _ hf.injective (fun s' => hf.measurableSet_image.mpr) _ ht]
rw [this, measure_sum_seq]
end ComapRight
section Piecewise
variable {η : Kernel α β} {s : Set α} {hs : MeasurableSet s} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
/-- `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.piecewise hs κ η` is the kernel equal to `κ` on the measurable set `s`
and to `η` on its complement. -/
def piecewise (hs : MeasurableSet s) (κ η : Kernel α β) : Kernel α β where
toFun a := if a ∈ s then κ a else η a
measurable' := κ.measurable.piecewise hs η.measurable
theorem piecewise_apply (a : α) : piecewise hs κ η a = if a ∈ s then κ a else η a :=
rfl
theorem piecewise_apply' (a : α) (t : Set β) :
piecewise hs κ η a t = if a ∈ s then κ a t else η a t := by
rw [piecewise_apply]; split_ifs <;> rfl
instance IsMarkovKernel.piecewise [IsMarkovKernel κ] [IsMarkovKernel η] :
IsMarkovKernel (piecewise hs κ η) := by
refine ⟨fun a => ⟨?_⟩⟩
rw [piecewise_apply', measure_univ, measure_univ, ite_self]
instance IsFiniteKernel.piecewise [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
IsFiniteKernel (piecewise hs κ η) := by
refine ⟨⟨max (IsFiniteKernel.bound κ) (IsFiniteKernel.bound η), ?_, fun a => ?_⟩⟩
· exact max_lt (IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ) (IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top η)
rw [piecewise_apply']
exact (ite_le_sup _ _ _).trans (sup_le_sup (measure_le_bound _ _ _) (measure_le_bound _ _ _))
protected instance IsSFiniteKernel.piecewise [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η] :
IsSFiniteKernel (piecewise hs κ η) := by
refine ⟨⟨fun n => piecewise hs (seq κ n) (seq η n), inferInstance, ?_⟩⟩
ext1 a
simp_rw [sum_apply, Kernel.piecewise_apply]
split_ifs <;> exact (measure_sum_seq _ a).symm
theorem lintegral_piecewise (a : α) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ b, g b ∂piecewise hs κ η a = if a ∈ s then ∫⁻ b, g b ∂κ a else ∫⁻ b, g b ∂η a := by
simp_rw [piecewise_apply]; split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem setLIntegral_piecewise (a : α) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) (t : Set β) :
∫⁻ b in t, g b ∂piecewise hs κ η a =
if a ∈ s then ∫⁻ b in t, g b ∂κ a else ∫⁻ b in t, g b ∂η a := by
simp_rw [piecewise_apply]; split_ifs <;> rfl
end Piecewise
lemma exists_ae_eq_isMarkovKernel {μ : Measure α}
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a)) (h' : μ ≠ 0) :
∃ (η : Kernel α β), (κ =ᵐ[μ] η) ∧ IsMarkovKernel η := by
classical
obtain ⟨s, s_meas, μs, hs⟩ : ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s = 0
∧ ∀ a ∉ s, IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a) := by
refine ⟨toMeasurable μ {a | ¬ IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a)}, measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _,
by simpa [measure_toMeasurable] using h, ?_⟩
intro a ha
contrapose! ha
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ha
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : sᶜ.Nonempty := by
contrapose! h'; simpa [μs, h'] using measure_univ_le_add_compl s (μ := μ)
refine ⟨Kernel.piecewise s_meas (Kernel.const _ (κ a)) κ, ?_, ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 μs] with b hb
simp [hb, piecewise]
· refine ⟨fun b ↦ ?_⟩
by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· simpa [hb, piecewise] using hs _ ha
· simpa [hb, piecewise] using hs _ hb
end Kernel
end ProbabilityTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean | 746 | 750 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Shing Tak Lam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Grpd
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Fundamental groupoid of a space
Given a topological space `X`, we can define the fundamental groupoid of `X` to be the category with
objects being points of `X`, and morphisms `x ⟶ y` being paths from `x` to `y`, quotiented by
homotopy equivalence. With this, the fundamental group of `X` based at `x` is just the automorphism
group of `x`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
universe u
variable {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X]
variable {x₀ x₁ : X}
noncomputable section
open unitInterval
namespace Path
namespace Homotopy
section
/-- Auxiliary function for `reflTransSymm`. -/
def reflTransSymmAux (x : I × I) : ℝ :=
if (x.2 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then x.1 * 2 * x.2 else x.1 * (2 - 2 * x.2)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_reflTransSymmAux : Continuous reflTransSymmAux := by
refine continuous_if_le ?_ ?_ (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) ?_
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
intro x hx
norm_num [hx, mul_assoc]
theorem reflTransSymmAux_mem_I (x : I × I) : reflTransSymmAux x ∈ I := by
dsimp only [reflTransSymmAux]
split_ifs
· constructor
· apply mul_nonneg
· apply mul_nonneg
· unit_interval
· norm_num
· unit_interval
· rw [mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_one₀
· unit_interval
· apply mul_nonneg
· norm_num
· unit_interval
· linarith
· constructor
· apply mul_nonneg
· unit_interval
linarith [unitInterval.nonneg x.2, unitInterval.le_one x.2]
· apply mul_le_one₀
· unit_interval
· linarith [unitInterval.nonneg x.2, unitInterval.le_one x.2]
· linarith [unitInterval.nonneg x.2, unitInterval.le_one x.2]
/-- For any path `p` from `x₀` to `x₁`, we have a homotopy from the constant path based at `x₀` to
`p.trans p.symm`. -/
def reflTransSymm (p : Path x₀ x₁) : Homotopy (Path.refl x₀) (p.trans p.symm) where
toFun x := p ⟨reflTransSymmAux x, reflTransSymmAux_mem_I x⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
map_zero_left := by simp [reflTransSymmAux]
map_one_left x := by
dsimp only [reflTransSymmAux, Path.coe_toContinuousMap, Path.trans]
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rw [Path.extend, Set.IccExtend_of_mem]
· norm_num
· rw [unitInterval.mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two]
exact ⟨unitInterval.nonneg x, h⟩
· rw [Path.symm, Path.extend, Set.IccExtend_of_mem]
· simp only [Set.Icc.coe_one, one_mul, coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply]
congr 1
ext
norm_num [sub_sub_eq_add_sub]
· rw [unitInterval.two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff]
exact ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, unitInterval.le_one x⟩
prop' t x hx := by
simp only [Set.mem_singleton_iff, Set.mem_insert_iff] at hx
simp only [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, coe_toContinuousMap, Path.refl_apply]
cases hx with
| inl hx
| inr hx =>
rw [hx]
norm_num [reflTransSymmAux]
/-- For any path `p` from `x₀` to `x₁`, we have a homotopy from the constant path based at `x₁` to
`p.symm.trans p`. -/
def reflSymmTrans (p : Path x₀ x₁) : Homotopy (Path.refl x₁) (p.symm.trans p) :=
(reflTransSymm p.symm).cast rfl <| congr_arg _ (Path.symm_symm _)
end
section TransRefl
/-- Auxiliary function for `trans_refl_reparam`. -/
def transReflReparamAux (t : I) : ℝ :=
if (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then 2 * t else 1
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_transReflReparamAux : Continuous transReflReparamAux := by
refine continuous_if_le ?_ ?_ (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) ?_ <;>
[fun_prop; fun_prop; fun_prop; fun_prop; skip]
intro x hx
simp [hx]
theorem transReflReparamAux_mem_I (t : I) : transReflReparamAux t ∈ I := by
unfold transReflReparamAux
split_ifs <;> constructor <;> linarith [unitInterval.le_one t, unitInterval.nonneg t]
theorem transReflReparamAux_zero : transReflReparamAux 0 = 0 := by
norm_num [transReflReparamAux]
theorem transReflReparamAux_one : transReflReparamAux 1 = 1 := by
norm_num [transReflReparamAux]
theorem trans_refl_reparam (p : Path x₀ x₁) :
p.trans (Path.refl x₁) =
p.reparam (fun t => ⟨transReflReparamAux t, transReflReparamAux_mem_I t⟩) (by fun_prop)
(Subtype.ext transReflReparamAux_zero) (Subtype.ext transReflReparamAux_one) := by
ext
unfold transReflReparamAux
| simp only [Path.trans_apply, not_le, coe_reparam, Function.comp_apply, one_div, Path.refl_apply]
split_ifs
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/FundamentalGroupoid/Basic.lean | 143 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Independent
/-!
# Simplicial complexes
In this file, we define simplicial complexes in `𝕜`-modules. A simplicial complex is a collection
of simplices closed by inclusion (of vertices) and intersection (of underlying sets).
We model them by a downward-closed set of affine independent finite sets whose convex hulls "glue
nicely", each finite set and its convex hull corresponding respectively to the vertices and the
underlying set of a simplex.
## Main declarations
* `SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E`: A simplicial complex in the `𝕜`-module `E`.
* `SimplicialComplex.vertices`: The zero dimensional faces of a simplicial complex.
* `SimplicialComplex.facets`: The maximal faces of a simplicial complex.
## Notation
`s ∈ K` means that `s` is a face of `K`.
`K ≤ L` means that the faces of `K` are faces of `L`.
## Implementation notes
"glue nicely" usually means that the intersection of two faces (as sets in the ambient space) is a
face. Given that we store the vertices, not the faces, this would be a bit awkward to spell.
Instead, `SimplicialComplex.inter_subset_convexHull` is an equivalent condition which works on the
vertices.
## TODO
Simplicial complexes can be generalized to affine spaces once `ConvexHull` has been ported.
-/
open Finset Set
variable (𝕜 E : Type*) [Ring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
namespace Geometry
-- TODO: update to new binder order? not sure what binder order is correct for `down_closed`.
/-- A simplicial complex in a `𝕜`-module is a collection of simplices which glue nicely together.
Note that the textbook meaning of "glue nicely" is given in
`Geometry.SimplicialComplex.disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convexHull`. It is mostly useless, as
`Geometry.SimplicialComplex.convexHull_inter_convexHull` is enough for all purposes. -/
@[ext]
structure SimplicialComplex where
/-- the faces of this simplicial complex: currently, given by their spanning vertices -/
faces : Set (Finset E)
/-- the empty set is not a face: hence, all faces are non-empty -/
not_empty_mem : ∅ ∉ faces
/-- the vertices in each face are affine independent: this is an implementation detail -/
indep : ∀ {s}, s ∈ faces → AffineIndependent 𝕜 ((↑) : s → E)
/-- faces are downward closed: a non-empty subset of its spanning vertices spans another face -/
down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ≠ ∅ → t ∈ faces
inter_subset_convexHull : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ∈ faces →
convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convexHull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convexHull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : Set E)
namespace SimplicialComplex
variable {𝕜 E}
variable {K : SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E} {s t : Finset E} {x : E}
/-- A `Finset` belongs to a `SimplicialComplex` if it's a face of it. -/
instance : Membership (Finset E) (SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨fun K s => s ∈ K.faces⟩
/-- The underlying space of a simplicial complex is the union of its faces. -/
def space (K : SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E) : Set E :=
⋃ s ∈ K.faces, convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E)
-- Porting note: Expanded `∃ s ∈ K.faces` to get the type to match more closely with Lean 3
theorem mem_space_iff : x ∈ K.space ↔ ∃ s ∈ K.faces, x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E) := by
simp [space]
-- Porting note: Original proof was `:= subset_biUnion_of_mem hs`
| theorem convexHull_subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ⊆ K.space := by
convert subset_biUnion_of_mem hs
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/SimplicialComplex/Basic.lean | 86 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Combination
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Jensen's inequality and maximum principle for convex functions
In this file, we prove the finite Jensen inequality and the finite maximum principle for convex
functions. The integral versions are to be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
## Main declarations
Jensen's inequalities:
* `ConvexOn.map_centerMass_le`, `ConvexOn.map_sum_le`: Convex Jensen's inequality. The image of a
convex combination of points under a convex function is less than the convex combination of the
images.
* `ConcaveOn.le_map_centerMass`, `ConcaveOn.le_map_sum`: Concave Jensen's inequality.
* `StrictConvexOn.map_sum_lt`: Convex strict Jensen inequality.
* `StrictConcaveOn.lt_map_sum`: Concave strict Jensen inequality.
As corollaries, we get:
* `StrictConvexOn.map_sum_eq_iff`: Equality case of the convex Jensen inequality.
* `StrictConcaveOn.map_sum_eq_iff`: Equality case of the concave Jensen inequality.
* `ConvexOn.exists_ge_of_mem_convexHull`: Maximum principle for convex functions.
* `ConcaveOn.exists_le_of_mem_convexHull`: Minimum principle for concave functions.
-/
open Finset LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F β ι : Type*}
/-! ### Jensen's inequality -/
section Jensen
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E]
[AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
[OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β} {t : Finset ι} {w : ι → 𝕜} {p : ι → E} {v : 𝕜} {q : E}
/-- Convex **Jensen's inequality**, `Finset.centerMass` version. -/
theorem ConvexOn.map_centerMass_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
f (t.centerMass w p) ≤ t.centerMass w (f ∘ p) := by
have hmem' : ∀ i ∈ t, (p i, (f ∘ p) i) ∈ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := fun i hi =>
⟨hmem i hi, le_rfl⟩
convert (hf.convex_epigraph.centerMass_mem h₀ h₁ hmem').2 <;>
simp only [centerMass, Function.comp, Prod.smul_fst, Prod.fst_sum, Prod.smul_snd, Prod.snd_sum]
/-- Concave **Jensen's inequality**, `Finset.centerMass` version. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.le_map_centerMass (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
t.centerMass w (f ∘ p) ≤ f (t.centerMass w p) :=
ConvexOn.map_centerMass_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hf h₀ h₁ hmem
/-- Convex **Jensen's inequality**, `Finset.sum` version. -/
theorem ConvexOn.map_sum_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1)
(hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) : f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) := by
simpa only [centerMass, h₁, inv_one, one_smul] using
hf.map_centerMass_le h₀ (h₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hmem
/-- Concave **Jensen's inequality**, `Finset.sum` version. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.le_map_sum (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
(∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)) ≤ f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) :=
ConvexOn.map_sum_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hf h₀ h₁ hmem
/-- Convex **Jensen's inequality** where an element plays a distinguished role. -/
lemma ConvexOn.map_add_sum_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : v + ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) (hv : 0 ≤ v) (hq : q ∈ s) :
f (v • q + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) ≤ v • f q + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) := by
let W j := Option.elim j v w
let P j := Option.elim j q p
have : f (∑ j ∈ insertNone t, W j • P j) ≤ ∑ j ∈ insertNone t, W j • f (P j) :=
hf.map_sum_le (forall_mem_insertNone.2 ⟨hv, h₀⟩) (by simpa using h₁)
(forall_mem_insertNone.2 ⟨hq, hmem⟩)
simpa using this
/-- Concave **Jensen's inequality** where an element plays a distinguished role. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.map_add_sum_le (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : v + ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) (hv : 0 ≤ v) (hq : q ∈ s) :
v • f q + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) ≤ f (v • q + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) :=
hf.dual.map_add_sum_le h₀ h₁ hmem hv hq
/-! ### Strict Jensen inequality -/
/-- Convex **strict Jensen inequality**.
If the function is strictly convex, the weights are strictly positive and the indexed family of
points is non-constant, then Jensen's inequality is strict.
See also `StrictConvexOn.map_sum_eq_iff`. -/
lemma StrictConvexOn.map_sum_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 < w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) (hp : ∃ j ∈ t, ∃ k ∈ t, p j ≠ p k) :
f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) < ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) := by
classical
obtain ⟨j, hj, k, hk, hjk⟩ := hp
-- We replace `t` by `t \ {j, k}`
have : k ∈ t.erase j := mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_apply_ne _ hjk.symm, hk⟩
let u := (t.erase j).erase k
have hj : j ∉ u := by simp [u]
have hk : k ∉ u := by simp [u]
have ht :
t = (u.cons k hk).cons j (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro (ne_of_apply_ne _ hjk) hj) := by
simp [u, insert_erase this, insert_erase ‹j ∈ t›, *]
clear_value u
subst ht
simp only [sum_cons]
have := h₀ j <| by simp
have := h₀ k <| by simp
let c := w j + w k
have hc : w j / c + w k / c = 1 := by field_simp [c]
calc f (w j • p j + (w k • p k + ∑ x ∈ u, w x • p x))
_ = f (c • ((w j / c) • p j + (w k / c) • p k) + ∑ x ∈ u, w x • p x) := by
congrm f ?_
match_scalars <;> field_simp
_ ≤ c • f ((w j / c) • p j + (w k / c) • p k) + ∑ x ∈ u, w x • f (p x) :=
-- apply the usual Jensen's inequality wrt the weighted average of the two distinguished
-- points and all the other points
hf.convexOn.map_add_sum_le (fun i hi ↦ (h₀ _ <| by simp [hi]).le)
(by simpa [-cons_eq_insert, ← add_assoc] using h₁)
(forall_of_forall_cons <| forall_of_forall_cons hmem) (by positivity) <| by
refine hf.1 (hmem _ <| by simp) (hmem _ <| by simp) ?_ ?_ hc <;> positivity
_ < c • ((w j / c) • f (p j) + (w k / c) • f (p k)) + ∑ x ∈ u, w x • f (p x) := by
-- then apply the definition of strict convexity for the two distinguished points
gcongr; refine hf.2 (hmem _ <| by simp) (hmem _ <| by simp) hjk ?_ ?_ hc <;> positivity
_ = (w j • f (p j) + w k • f (p k)) + ∑ x ∈ u, w x • f (p x) := by
match_scalars <;> field_simp
_ = w j • f (p j) + (w k • f (p k) + ∑ x ∈ u, w x • f (p x)) := by abel_nf
/-- Concave **strict Jensen inequality**.
If the function is strictly concave, the weights are strictly positive and the indexed family of
points is non-constant, then Jensen's inequality is strict.
See also `StrictConcaveOn.map_sum_eq_iff`. -/
lemma StrictConcaveOn.lt_map_sum (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 < w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) (hp : ∃ j ∈ t, ∃ k ∈ t, p j ≠ p k) :
∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) < f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) := hf.dual.map_sum_lt h₀ h₁ hmem hp
/-! ### Equality case of Jensen's inequality -/
/-- A form of the **equality case of Jensen's equality**.
For a strictly convex function `f` and positive weights `w`, if
`f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)`, then the points `p` are all equal.
See also `StrictConvexOn.map_sum_eq_iff`. -/
lemma StrictConvexOn.eq_of_le_map_sum (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 < w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s)
(h_eq : ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) ≤ f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i)) :
∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ t → ∀ ⦃k⦄, k ∈ t → p j = p k := by
by_contra!; exact h_eq.not_lt <| hf.map_sum_lt h₀ h₁ hmem this
/-- A form of the **equality case of Jensen's equality**.
For a strictly concave function `f` and positive weights `w`, if
`f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)`, then the points `p` are all equal.
See also `StrictConcaveOn.map_sum_eq_iff`. -/
lemma StrictConcaveOn.eq_of_map_sum_eq (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 < w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s)
(h_eq : f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)) :
∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ t → ∀ ⦃k⦄, k ∈ t → p j = p k := by
by_contra!; exact h_eq.not_lt <| hf.lt_map_sum h₀ h₁ hmem this
/-- Canonical form of the **equality case of Jensen's equality**.
For a strictly convex function `f` and positive weights `w`, we have
`f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)` if and only if the points `p` are all equal
(and in fact all equal to their center of mass wrt `w`). -/
lemma StrictConvexOn.map_sum_eq_iff {w : ι → 𝕜} {p : ι → E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 < w i) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ t, p j = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i := by
constructor
· obtain rfl | ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
intro h_eq i hi
have H : ∀ j ∈ t, p j = p i₀ := by
intro j hj
apply hf.eq_of_le_map_sum h₀ h₁ hmem h_eq.ge hj hi₀
calc p i = p i₀ := by rw [H _ hi]
_ = (1 : 𝕜) • p i₀ := by simp
_ = (∑ j ∈ t, w j) • p i₀ := by rw [h₁]
_ = ∑ j ∈ t, (w j • p i₀) := by rw [sum_smul]
_ = ∑ j ∈ t, (w j • p j) := by congr! 2 with j hj; rw [← H _ hj]
· intro h
have H : ∀ j ∈ t, w j • f (p j) = w j • f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) := by
intro j hj
simp [h j hj]
rw [sum_congr rfl H, ← sum_smul, h₁, one_smul]
/-- Canonical form of the **equality case of Jensen's equality**.
For a strictly concave function `f` and positive weights `w`, we have
`f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)` if and only if the points `p` are all equal
(and in fact all equal to their center of mass wrt `w`). -/
lemma StrictConcaveOn.map_sum_eq_iff (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 < w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) ↔ ∀ j ∈ t, p j = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i := by
simpa using hf.neg.map_sum_eq_iff h₀ h₁ hmem
/-- Canonical form of the **equality case of Jensen's equality**.
For a strictly convex function `f` and nonnegative weights `w`, we have
`f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)` if and only if the points `p` with nonzero
weight are all equal (and in fact all equal to their center of mass wrt `w`). -/
lemma StrictConvexOn.map_sum_eq_iff' (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) ↔
∀ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0 → p j = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i := by
have hw (i) (_ : i ∈ t) : w i • p i ≠ 0 → w i ≠ 0 := by aesop
have hw' (i) (_ : i ∈ t) : w i • f (p i) ≠ 0 → w i ≠ 0 := by aesop
rw [← sum_filter_of_ne hw, ← sum_filter_of_ne hw', hf.map_sum_eq_iff]
· simp
· simp +contextual [(h₀ _ _).gt_iff_ne]
· rwa [sum_filter_ne_zero]
· simp +contextual [hmem _ _]
/-- Canonical form of the **equality case of Jensen's equality**.
For a strictly concave function `f` and nonnegative weights `w`, we have
`f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i)` if and only if the points `p` with nonzero
weight are all equal (and in fact all equal to their center of mass wrt `w`). -/
lemma StrictConcaveOn.map_sum_eq_iff' (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) (hmem : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
f (∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i) = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • f (p i) ↔
∀ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0 → p j = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • p i := hf.dual.map_sum_eq_iff' h₀ h₁ hmem
end Jensen
/-! ### Maximum principle -/
section MaximumPrinciple
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E]
[AddCommGroup β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [Module 𝕜 E]
[Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β} {w : ι → 𝕜} {p : ι → E}
{x y z : E}
theorem ConvexOn.le_sup_of_mem_convexHull {t : Finset E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hts : ↑t ⊆ s)
(hx : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (t : Set E)) :
f x ≤ t.sup' (coe_nonempty.1 <| convexHull_nonempty_iff.1 ⟨x, hx⟩) f := by
obtain ⟨w, hw₀, hw₁, rfl⟩ := mem_convexHull.1 hx
exact (hf.map_centerMass_le hw₀ (by positivity) hts).trans
(centerMass_le_sup hw₀ <| by positivity)
theorem ConvexOn.inf_le_of_mem_convexHull {t : Finset E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hts : ↑t ⊆ s)
(hx : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (t : Set E)) :
t.inf' (coe_nonempty.1 <| convexHull_nonempty_iff.1 ⟨x, hx⟩) f ≤ f x :=
hf.dual.le_sup_of_mem_convexHull hts hx
/-- If a function `f` is convex on `s`, then the value it takes at some center of mass of points of
`s` is less than the value it takes on one of those points. -/
lemma ConvexOn.exists_ge_of_centerMass {t : Finset ι} (h : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) (hp : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
∃ i ∈ t, f (t.centerMass w p) ≤ f (p i) := by
set y := t.centerMass w p
-- TODO: can `rsuffices` be used to write the `exact` first, then the proof of this obtain?
obtain ⟨i, hi, hfi⟩ : ∃ i ∈ {i ∈ t | w i ≠ 0}, w i • f y ≤ w i • (f ∘ p) i := by
have hw' : (0 : 𝕜) < ∑ i ∈ t with w i ≠ 0, w i := by rwa [sum_filter_ne_zero]
refine exists_le_of_sum_le (nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero hw'.ne') ?_
rw [← sum_smul, ← smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left (inv_pos.2 hw'), inv_smul_smul₀ hw'.ne', ←
centerMass, centerMass_filter_ne_zero]
exact h.map_centerMass_le hw₀ hw₁ hp
rw [mem_filter] at hi
exact ⟨i, hi.1, (smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left <| (hw₀ i hi.1).lt_of_ne hi.2.symm).1 hfi⟩
/-- If a function `f` is concave on `s`, then the value it takes at some center of mass of points of
`s` is greater than the value it takes on one of those points. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.exists_le_of_centerMass {t : Finset ι} (h : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) (hp : ∀ i ∈ t, p i ∈ s) :
∃ i ∈ t, f (p i) ≤ f (t.centerMass w p) := h.dual.exists_ge_of_centerMass hw₀ hw₁ hp
/-- **Maximum principle** for convex functions. If a function `f` is convex on the convex hull of
`s`, then the eventual maximum of `f` on `convexHull 𝕜 s` lies in `s`. -/
lemma ConvexOn.exists_ge_of_mem_convexHull {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hts : t ⊆ s)
(hx : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 t) : ∃ y ∈ t, f x ≤ f y := by
rw [_root_.convexHull_eq] at hx
obtain ⟨α, t, w, p, hw₀, hw₁, hp, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨i, hit, Hi⟩ := hf.exists_ge_of_centerMass hw₀ (hw₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)
fun i hi ↦ hts (hp i hi)
exact ⟨p i, hp i hit, Hi⟩
/-- **Minimum principle** for concave functions. If a function `f` is concave on the convex hull of
`s`, then the eventual minimum of `f` on `convexHull 𝕜 s` lies in `s`. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.exists_le_of_mem_convexHull {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hts : t ⊆ s)
(hx : x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 t) : ∃ y ∈ t, f y ≤ f x := hf.dual.exists_ge_of_mem_convexHull hts hx
/-- **Maximum principle** for convex functions on a segment. If a function `f` is convex on the
segment `[x, y]`, then the eventual maximum of `f` on `[x, y]` is at `x` or `y`. -/
lemma ConvexOn.le_max_of_mem_segment (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : f z ≤ max (f x) (f y) := by
rw [← convexHull_pair] at hz; simpa using hf.exists_ge_of_mem_convexHull (pair_subset hx hy) hz
/-- **Minimum principle** for concave functions on a segment. If a function `f` is concave on the
segment `[x, y]`, then the eventual minimum of `f` on `[x, y]` is at `x` or `y`. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.min_le_of_mem_segment (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f z := hf.dual.le_max_of_mem_segment hx hy hz
/-- **Maximum principle** for convex functions on an interval. If a function `f` is convex on the
interval `[x, y]`, then the eventual maximum of `f` on `[x, y]` is at `x` or `y`. -/
lemma ConvexOn.le_max_of_mem_Icc {s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → β} {x y z : 𝕜} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ Icc x y) : f z ≤ max (f x) (f y) := by
rw [← segment_eq_Icc (hz.1.trans hz.2)] at hz; exact hf.le_max_of_mem_segment hx hy hz
|
/-- **Minimum principle** for concave functions on an interval. If a function `f` is concave on the
interval `[x, y]`, then the eventual minimum of `f` on `[x, y]` is at `x` or `y`. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.min_le_of_mem_Icc {s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → β} {x y z : 𝕜} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ Icc x y) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f z :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Jensen.lean | 313 | 317 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrongEpi
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Factorization
/-!
# Categorical images
We define the categorical image of `f` as a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism `m`,
so that `m` factors through the `m'` in any other such factorisation.
## Main definitions
* A `MonoFactorisation` is a factorisation `f = e ≫ m`, where `m` is a monomorphism
* `IsImage F` means that a given mono factorisation `F` has the universal property of the image.
* `HasImage f` means that there is some image factorization for the morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`.
* In this case, `image f` is some image object (selected with choice), `image.ι f : image f ⟶ Y`
is the monomorphism `m` of the factorisation and `factorThruImage f : X ⟶ image f` is the
morphism `e`.
* `HasImages C` means that every morphism in `C` has an image.
* Let `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : P ⟶ Q` be morphisms in `C`, which we will represent as objects of the
arrow category `Arrow C`. Then `sq : f ⟶ g` is a commutative square in `C`. If `f` and `g` have
images, then `HasImageMap sq` represents the fact that there is a morphism
`i : image f ⟶ image g` making the diagram
X ----→ image f ----→ Y
| | |
| | |
↓ ↓ ↓
P ----→ image g ----→ Q
commute, where the top row is the image factorisation of `f`, the bottom row is the image
factorisation of `g`, and the outer rectangle is the commutative square `sq`.
* If a category `HasImages`, then `HasImageMaps` means that every commutative square admits an
image map.
* If a category `HasImages`, then `HasStrongEpiImages` means that the morphism to the image is
always a strong epimorphism.
## Main statements
* When `C` has equalizers, the morphism `e` appearing in an image factorisation is an epimorphism.
* When `C` has strong epi images, then these images admit image maps.
## Future work
* TODO: coimages, and abelian categories.
* TODO: connect this with existing working in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
-/
noncomputable section
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- A factorisation of a morphism `f = e ≫ m`, with `m` monic. -/
structure MonoFactorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) where
I : C -- Porting note: violates naming conventions but can't think a better replacement
m : I ⟶ Y
[m_mono : Mono m]
e : X ⟶ I
fac : e ≫ m = f := by aesop_cat
attribute [inherit_doc MonoFactorisation] MonoFactorisation.I MonoFactorisation.m
MonoFactorisation.m_mono MonoFactorisation.e MonoFactorisation.fac
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoFactorisation.fac
attribute [instance] MonoFactorisation.m_mono
namespace MonoFactorisation
/-- The obvious factorisation of a monomorphism through itself. -/
def self [Mono f] : MonoFactorisation f where
I := X
m := f
e := 𝟙 X
-- I'm not sure we really need this, but the linter says that an inhabited instance
-- ought to exist...
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (MonoFactorisation f) := ⟨self f⟩
variable {f}
/-- The morphism `m` in a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism is uniquely
determined. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hI : F.I = F'.I)
(hm : F.m = eqToHom hI ≫ F'.m) : F = F' := by
obtain ⟨_, Fm, _, Ffac⟩ := F; obtain ⟨_, Fm', _, Ffac'⟩ := F'
cases hI
simp? at hm says simp only [eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp] at hm
congr
apply (cancel_mono Fm).1
rw [Ffac, hm, Ffac']
/-- Any mono factorisation of `f` gives a mono factorisation of `f ≫ g` when `g` is a mono. -/
@[simps]
def compMono (F : MonoFactorisation f) {Y' : C} (g : Y ⟶ Y') [Mono g] :
MonoFactorisation (f ≫ g) where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ g
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
e := F.e
/-- A mono factorisation of `f ≫ g`, where `g` is an isomorphism,
gives a mono factorisation of `f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofCompIso {Y' : C} {g : Y ⟶ Y'} [IsIso g] (F : MonoFactorisation (f ≫ g)) :
MonoFactorisation f where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ inv g
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
e := F.e
/-- Any mono factorisation of `f` gives a mono factorisation of `g ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def isoComp (F : MonoFactorisation f) {X' : C} (g : X' ⟶ X) : MonoFactorisation (g ≫ f) where
I := F.I
m := F.m
e := g ≫ F.e
/-- A mono factorisation of `g ≫ f`, where `g` is an isomorphism,
gives a mono factorisation of `f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsoComp {X' : C} (g : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso g] (F : MonoFactorisation (g ≫ f)) :
MonoFactorisation f where
I := F.I
m := F.m
e := inv g ≫ F.e
/-- If `f` and `g` are isomorphic arrows, then a mono factorisation of `f`
gives a mono factorisation of `g` -/
@[simps]
def ofArrowIso {f g : Arrow C} (F : MonoFactorisation f.hom) (sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] :
MonoFactorisation g.hom where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ sq.right
e := inv sq.left ≫ F.e
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
fac := by simp only [fac_assoc, Arrow.w, IsIso.inv_comp_eq, Category.assoc]
end MonoFactorisation
variable {f}
/-- Data exhibiting that a given factorisation through a mono is initial. -/
structure IsImage (F : MonoFactorisation f) where
lift : ∀ F' : MonoFactorisation f, F.I ⟶ F'.I
lift_fac : ∀ F' : MonoFactorisation f, lift F' ≫ F'.m = F.m := by aesop_cat
attribute [inherit_doc IsImage] IsImage.lift IsImage.lift_fac
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsImage.lift_fac
namespace IsImage
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem fac_lift {F : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) (F' : MonoFactorisation f) :
F.e ≫ hF.lift F' = F'.e :=
(cancel_mono F'.m).1 <| by simp
variable (f)
/-- The trivial factorisation of a monomorphism satisfies the universal property. -/
@[simps]
def self [Mono f] : IsImage (MonoFactorisation.self f) where lift F' := F'.e
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (IsImage (MonoFactorisation.self f)) :=
⟨self f⟩
variable {f}
-- TODO this is another good candidate for a future `UniqueUpToCanonicalIso`.
/-- Two factorisations through monomorphisms satisfying the universal property
must factor through isomorphic objects. -/
@[simps]
def isoExt {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) (hF' : IsImage F') :
F.I ≅ F'.I where
hom := hF.lift F'
inv := hF'.lift F
hom_inv_id := (cancel_mono F.m).1 (by simp)
inv_hom_id := (cancel_mono F'.m).1 (by simp)
variable {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) (hF' : IsImage F')
theorem isoExt_hom_m : (isoExt hF hF').hom ≫ F'.m = F.m := by simp
theorem isoExt_inv_m : (isoExt hF hF').inv ≫ F.m = F'.m := by simp
theorem e_isoExt_hom : F.e ≫ (isoExt hF hF').hom = F'.e := by simp
theorem e_isoExt_inv : F'.e ≫ (isoExt hF hF').inv = F.e := by simp
/-- If `f` and `g` are isomorphic arrows, then a mono factorisation of `f` that is an image
gives a mono factorisation of `g` that is an image -/
@[simps]
def ofArrowIso {f g : Arrow C} {F : MonoFactorisation f.hom} (hF : IsImage F) (sq : f ⟶ g)
[IsIso sq] : IsImage (F.ofArrowIso sq) where
lift F' := hF.lift (F'.ofArrowIso (inv sq))
lift_fac F' := by
simpa only [MonoFactorisation.ofArrowIso_m, Arrow.inv_right, ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_inv_eq] using hF.lift_fac (F'.ofArrowIso (inv sq))
end IsImage
variable (f)
/-- Data exhibiting that a morphism `f` has an image. -/
structure ImageFactorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) where
F : MonoFactorisation f -- Porting note: another violation of the naming convention
isImage : IsImage F
attribute [inherit_doc ImageFactorisation] ImageFactorisation.F ImageFactorisation.isImage
namespace ImageFactorisation
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (ImageFactorisation f) :=
⟨⟨_, IsImage.self f⟩⟩
/-- If `f` and `g` are isomorphic arrows, then an image factorisation of `f`
gives an image factorisation of `g` -/
@[simps]
def ofArrowIso {f g : Arrow C} (F : ImageFactorisation f.hom) (sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] :
ImageFactorisation g.hom where
F := F.F.ofArrowIso sq
isImage := F.isImage.ofArrowIso sq
end ImageFactorisation
/-- `HasImage f` means that there exists an image factorisation of `f`. -/
class HasImage (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_image : Nonempty (ImageFactorisation f)
attribute [inherit_doc HasImage] HasImage.exists_image
theorem HasImage.mk {f : X ⟶ Y} (F : ImageFactorisation f) : HasImage f :=
⟨Nonempty.intro F⟩
theorem HasImage.of_arrow_iso {f g : Arrow C} [h : HasImage f.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] :
HasImage g.hom :=
⟨⟨h.exists_image.some.ofArrowIso sq⟩⟩
instance (priority := 100) mono_hasImage (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : HasImage f :=
HasImage.mk ⟨_, IsImage.self f⟩
section
variable [HasImage f]
/-- Some factorisation of `f` through a monomorphism (selected with choice). -/
def Image.monoFactorisation : MonoFactorisation f :=
(Classical.choice HasImage.exists_image).F
/-- The witness of the universal property for the chosen factorisation of `f` through
a monomorphism. -/
def Image.isImage : IsImage (Image.monoFactorisation f) :=
(Classical.choice HasImage.exists_image).isImage
/-- The categorical image of a morphism. -/
def image : C :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).I
/-- The inclusion of the image of a morphism into the target. -/
def image.ι : image f ⟶ Y :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).m
@[simp]
theorem image.as_ι : (Image.monoFactorisation f).m = image.ι f := rfl
instance : Mono (image.ι f) :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).m_mono
/-- The map from the source to the image of a morphism. -/
def factorThruImage : X ⟶ image f :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).e
/-- Rewrite in terms of the `factorThruImage` interface. -/
@[simp]
theorem as_factorThruImage : (Image.monoFactorisation f).e = factorThruImage f :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.fac : factorThruImage f ≫ image.ι f = f :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).fac
variable {f}
/-- Any other factorisation of the morphism `f` through a monomorphism receives a map from the
image. -/
def image.lift (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : image f ⟶ F'.I :=
(Image.isImage f).lift F'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.lift_fac (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : image.lift F' ≫ F'.m = image.ι f :=
(Image.isImage f).lift_fac F'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.fac_lift (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : factorThruImage f ≫ image.lift F' = F'.e :=
(Image.isImage f).fac_lift F'
@[simp]
theorem image.isImage_lift (F : MonoFactorisation f) : (Image.isImage f).lift F = image.lift F :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem IsImage.lift_ι {F : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) :
hF.lift (Image.monoFactorisation f) ≫ image.ι f = F.m :=
hF.lift_fac _
-- TODO we could put a category structure on `MonoFactorisation f`,
-- with the morphisms being `g : I ⟶ I'` commuting with the `m`s
-- (they then automatically commute with the `e`s)
-- and show that an `imageOf f` gives an initial object there
-- (uniqueness of the lift comes for free).
instance image.lift_mono (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : Mono (image.lift F') := by
refine @mono_of_mono _ _ _ _ _ _ F'.m ?_
simpa using MonoFactorisation.m_mono _
theorem HasImage.uniq (F' : MonoFactorisation f) (l : image f ⟶ F'.I) (w : l ≫ F'.m = image.ι f) :
l = image.lift F' :=
(cancel_mono F'.m).1 (by simp [w])
/-- If `has_image g`, then `has_image (f ≫ g)` when `f` is an isomorphism. -/
instance {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasImage g] : HasImage (f ≫ g) where
exists_image :=
⟨{ F :=
{ I := image g
m := image.ι g
e := f ≫ factorThruImage g }
isImage :=
{ lift := fun F' => image.lift
{ I := F'.I
m := F'.m
e := inv f ≫ F'.e } } }⟩
end
section
variable (C)
/-- `HasImages` asserts that every morphism has an image. -/
class HasImages : Prop where
has_image : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), HasImage f
attribute [inherit_doc HasImages] HasImages.has_image
attribute [instance 100] HasImages.has_image
end
section
/-- The image of a monomorphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def imageMonoIsoSource [Mono f] : image f ≅ X :=
IsImage.isoExt (Image.isImage f) (IsImage.self f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageMonoIsoSource_inv_ι [Mono f] : (imageMonoIsoSource f).inv ≫ image.ι f = f := by
simp [imageMonoIsoSource]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageMonoIsoSource_hom_self [Mono f] : (imageMonoIsoSource f).hom ≫ f = image.ι f := by
simp only [← imageMonoIsoSource_inv_ι f]
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.id_comp]
-- This is the proof that `factorThruImage f` is an epimorphism
-- from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_%28category_theory%29, which is in turn taken from:
-- Mitchell, Barry (1965), Theory of categories, MR 0202787, p.12, Proposition 10.1
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem image.ext [HasImage f] {W : C} {g h : image f ⟶ W} [HasLimit (parallelPair g h)]
(w : factorThruImage f ≫ g = factorThruImage f ≫ h) : g = h := by
let q := equalizer.ι g h
let e' := equalizer.lift _ w
let F' : MonoFactorisation f :=
{ I := equalizer g h
m := q ≫ image.ι f
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
e := e' }
let v := image.lift F'
have t₀ : v ≫ q ≫ image.ι f = image.ι f := image.lift_fac F'
have t : v ≫ q = 𝟙 (image f) :=
(cancel_mono_id (image.ι f)).1
(by
convert t₀ using 1
rw [Category.assoc])
-- The proof from wikipedia next proves `q ≫ v = 𝟙 _`,
-- and concludes that `equalizer g h ≅ image f`,
-- but this isn't necessary.
calc
g = 𝟙 (image f) ≫ g := by rw [Category.id_comp]
_ = v ≫ q ≫ g := by rw [← t, Category.assoc]
_ = v ≫ q ≫ h := by rw [equalizer.condition g h]
_ = 𝟙 (image f) ≫ h := by rw [← Category.assoc, t]
_ = h := by rw [Category.id_comp]
instance [HasImage f] [∀ {Z : C} (g h : image f ⟶ Z), HasLimit (parallelPair g h)] :
Epi (factorThruImage f) :=
⟨fun _ _ w => image.ext f w⟩
theorem epi_image_of_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] [E : Epi f] : Epi (image.ι f) := by
rw [← image.fac f] at E
exact epi_of_epi (factorThruImage f) (image.ι f)
theorem epi_of_epi_image {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] [Epi (image.ι f)]
[Epi (factorThruImage f)] : Epi f := by
rw [← image.fac f]
apply epi_comp
end
section
variable {f}
variable {f' : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f] [HasImage f']
/-- An equation between morphisms gives a comparison map between the images
(which momentarily we prove is an iso).
-/
def image.eqToHom (h : f = f') : image f ⟶ image f' :=
image.lift
{ I := image f'
m := image.ι f'
e := factorThruImage f'
fac := by rw [h]; simp only [image.fac]}
instance (h : f = f') : IsIso (image.eqToHom h) :=
⟨⟨image.eqToHom h.symm,
⟨(cancel_mono (image.ι f)).1 (by
-- Porting note: added let's for used to be a simp [image.eqToHom]
let F : MonoFactorisation f' :=
⟨image f, image.ι f, factorThruImage f, (by aesop_cat)⟩
dsimp [image.eqToHom]
rw [Category.id_comp,Category.assoc,image.lift_fac F]
let F' : MonoFactorisation f :=
⟨image f', image.ι f', factorThruImage f', (by aesop_cat)⟩
rw [image.lift_fac F'] ),
(cancel_mono (image.ι f')).1 (by
-- Porting note: added let's for used to be a simp [image.eqToHom]
let F' : MonoFactorisation f :=
⟨image f', image.ι f', factorThruImage f', (by aesop_cat)⟩
dsimp [image.eqToHom]
rw [Category.id_comp,Category.assoc,image.lift_fac F']
let F : MonoFactorisation f' :=
⟨image f, image.ι f, factorThruImage f, (by aesop_cat)⟩
rw [image.lift_fac F])⟩⟩⟩
/-- An equation between morphisms gives an isomorphism between the images. -/
def image.eqToIso (h : f = f') : image f ≅ image f' :=
asIso (image.eqToHom h)
/-- As long as the category has equalizers,
the image inclusion maps commute with `image.eqToIso`.
-/
theorem image.eq_fac [HasEqualizers C] (h : f = f') :
image.ι f = (image.eqToIso h).hom ≫ image.ι f' := by
apply image.ext
dsimp [asIso,image.eqToIso, image.eqToHom]
rw [image.lift_fac] -- Porting note: simp did not fire with this it seems
end
section
variable {Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- The comparison map `image (f ≫ g) ⟶ image g`. -/
def image.preComp [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] : image (f ≫ g) ⟶ image g :=
image.lift
{ I := image g
m := image.ι g
e := f ≫ factorThruImage g }
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.preComp_ι [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] :
image.preComp f g ≫ image.ι g = image.ι (f ≫ g) := by
dsimp [image.preComp]
rw [image.lift_fac] -- Porting note: also here, see image.eq_fac
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.factorThruImage_preComp [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] :
factorThruImage (f ≫ g) ≫ image.preComp f g = f ≫ factorThruImage g := by simp [image.preComp]
/-- `image.preComp f g` is a monomorphism.
-/
instance image.preComp_mono [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] : Mono (image.preComp f g) := by
refine @mono_of_mono _ _ _ _ _ _ (image.ι g) ?_
simp only [image.preComp_ι]
infer_instance
/-- The two step comparison map
`image (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ⟶ image (g ≫ h) ⟶ image h`
agrees with the one step comparison map
`image (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ≅ image ((f ≫ g) ≫ h) ⟶ image h`.
-/
theorem image.preComp_comp {W : C} (h : Z ⟶ W) [HasImage (g ≫ h)] [HasImage (f ≫ g ≫ h)]
[HasImage h] [HasImage ((f ≫ g) ≫ h)] :
image.preComp f (g ≫ h) ≫ image.preComp g h =
image.eqToHom (Category.assoc f g h).symm ≫ image.preComp (f ≫ g) h := by
apply (cancel_mono (image.ι h)).1
dsimp [image.preComp, image.eqToHom]
repeat (rw [Category.assoc,image.lift_fac])
rw [image.lift_fac,image.lift_fac]
variable [HasEqualizers C]
/-- `image.preComp f g` is an epimorphism when `f` is an epimorphism
(we need `C` to have equalizers to prove this).
-/
instance image.preComp_epi_of_epi [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] [Epi f] :
Epi (image.preComp f g) := by
apply @epi_of_epi_fac _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ (image.factorThruImage_preComp _ _)
exact epi_comp _ _
instance hasImage_iso_comp [IsIso f] [HasImage g] : HasImage (f ≫ g) :=
HasImage.mk
{ F := (Image.monoFactorisation g).isoComp f
isImage := { lift := fun F' => image.lift (F'.ofIsoComp f)
lift_fac := fun F' => by
dsimp
have : (MonoFactorisation.ofIsoComp f F').m = F'.m := rfl
rw [← this,image.lift_fac (MonoFactorisation.ofIsoComp f F')] } }
/-- `image.preComp f g` is an isomorphism when `f` is an isomorphism
(we need `C` to have equalizers to prove this).
-/
instance image.isIso_precomp_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] [HasImage g] : IsIso (image.preComp f g) :=
⟨⟨image.lift
{ I := image (f ≫ g)
m := image.ι (f ≫ g)
e := inv f ≫ factorThruImage (f ≫ g) },
⟨by
ext
simp [image.preComp], by
ext
simp [image.preComp]⟩⟩⟩
-- Note that in general we don't have the other comparison map you might expect
-- `image f ⟶ image (f ≫ g)`.
instance hasImage_comp_iso [HasImage f] [IsIso g] : HasImage (f ≫ g) :=
HasImage.mk
{ F := (Image.monoFactorisation f).compMono g
isImage :=
{ lift := fun F' => image.lift F'.ofCompIso
lift_fac := fun F' => by
rw [← Category.comp_id (image.lift (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F') ≫ F'.m),
← IsIso.inv_hom_id g,← Category.assoc]
refine congrArg (· ≫ g) ?_
have : (image.lift (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F') ≫ F'.m) ≫ inv g =
image.lift (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F') ≫
((MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F').m) := by
simp only [MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso_I, Category.assoc,
MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso_m]
rw [this, image.lift_fac (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F'),image.as_ι] }}
/-- Postcomposing by an isomorphism induces an isomorphism on the image. -/
def image.compIso [HasImage f] [IsIso g] : image f ≅ image (f ≫ g) where
hom := image.lift (Image.monoFactorisation (f ≫ g)).ofCompIso
inv := image.lift ((Image.monoFactorisation f).compMono g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.compIso_hom_comp_image_ι [HasImage f] [IsIso g] :
(image.compIso f g).hom ≫ image.ι (f ≫ g) = image.ι f ≫ g := by
ext
simp [image.compIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.compIso_inv_comp_image_ι [HasImage f] [IsIso g] :
(image.compIso f g).inv ≫ image.ι f = image.ι (f ≫ g) ≫ inv g := by
ext
simp [image.compIso]
end
end CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section
instance {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] : HasImage (Arrow.mk f).hom :=
show HasImage f by infer_instance
end
section HasImageMap
-- Don't generate unnecessary injectivity lemmas which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- An image map is a morphism `image f → image g` fitting into a commutative square and satisfying
the obvious commutativity conditions. -/
structure ImageMap {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) where
map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom
map_ι : map ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right := by aesop
attribute [inherit_doc ImageMap] ImageMap.map ImageMap.map_ι
instance inhabitedImageMap {f : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] : Inhabited (ImageMap (𝟙 f)) :=
⟨⟨𝟙 _, by simp⟩⟩
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ImageMap.map_ι
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ImageMap.factor_map {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(m : ImageMap sq) : factorThruImage f.hom ≫ m.map = sq.left ≫ factorThruImage g.hom :=
(cancel_mono (image.ι g.hom)).1 <| by simp
/-- To give an image map for a commutative square with `f` at the top and `g` at the bottom, it
suffices to give a map between any mono factorisation of `f` and any image factorisation of
`g`. -/
def ImageMap.transport {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(F : MonoFactorisation f.hom) {F' : MonoFactorisation g.hom} (hF' : IsImage F')
{map : F.I ⟶ F'.I} (map_ι : map ≫ F'.m = F.m ≫ sq.right) : ImageMap sq where
map := image.lift F ≫ map ≫ hF'.lift (Image.monoFactorisation g.hom)
map_ι := by simp [map_ι]
/-- `HasImageMap sq` means that there is an `ImageMap` for the square `sq`. -/
class HasImageMap {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) : Prop where
mk' ::
has_image_map : Nonempty (ImageMap sq)
attribute [inherit_doc HasImageMap] HasImageMap.has_image_map
theorem HasImageMap.mk {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] {sq : f ⟶ g}
(m : ImageMap sq) : HasImageMap sq :=
⟨Nonempty.intro m⟩
theorem HasImageMap.transport {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(F : MonoFactorisation f.hom) {F' : MonoFactorisation g.hom} (hF' : IsImage F')
(map : F.I ⟶ F'.I) (map_ι : map ≫ F'.m = F.m ≫ sq.right) : HasImageMap sq :=
HasImageMap.mk <| ImageMap.transport sq F hF' map_ι
/-- Obtain an `ImageMap` from a `HasImageMap` instance. -/
def HasImageMap.imageMap {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
[HasImageMap sq] : ImageMap sq :=
Classical.choice <| @HasImageMap.has_image_map _ _ _ _ _ _ sq _
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasImageMapOfIsIso {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom]
(sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] : HasImageMap sq :=
HasImageMap.mk
{ map := image.lift ((Image.monoFactorisation g.hom).ofArrowIso (inv sq))
map_ι := by
erw [← cancel_mono (inv sq).right, Category.assoc, ← MonoFactorisation.ofArrowIso_m,
image.lift_fac, Category.assoc, ← Comma.comp_right, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Comma.id_right,
Category.comp_id] }
instance HasImageMap.comp {f g h : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] [HasImage h.hom]
(sq1 : f ⟶ g) (sq2 : g ⟶ h) [HasImageMap sq1] [HasImageMap sq2] : HasImageMap (sq1 ≫ sq2) :=
HasImageMap.mk
{ map := (HasImageMap.imageMap sq1).map ≫ (HasImageMap.imageMap sq2).map
map_ι := by
rw [Category.assoc,ImageMap.map_ι, ImageMap.map_ι_assoc, Comma.comp_right] }
variable {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
section
attribute [local ext] ImageMap
/- Porting note: ImageMap.mk.injEq has LHS simplify to True due to the next instance
We make a replacement -/
theorem ImageMap.map_uniq_aux {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] {sq : f ⟶ g}
(map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom)
(map_ι : map ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right := by aesop_cat)
(map' : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom)
(map_ι' : map' ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right) : (map = map') := by
have : map ≫ image.ι g.hom = map' ≫ image.ι g.hom := by rw [map_ι,map_ι']
apply (cancel_mono (image.ι g.hom)).1 this
-- Porting note: added to get variant on ImageMap.mk.injEq below
theorem ImageMap.map_uniq {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom]
{sq : f ⟶ g} (F G : ImageMap sq) : F.map = G.map := by
apply ImageMap.map_uniq_aux _ F.map_ι _ G.map_ι
@[simp]
theorem ImageMap.mk.injEq' {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] {sq : f ⟶ g}
(map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom)
(map_ι : map ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right := by aesop_cat)
(map' : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom)
(map_ι' : map' ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right) : (map = map') = True := by
simp only [Functor.id_obj, eq_iff_iff, iff_true]
apply ImageMap.map_uniq_aux _ map_ι _ map_ι'
instance : Subsingleton (ImageMap sq) :=
Subsingleton.intro fun a b =>
ImageMap.ext <| ImageMap.map_uniq a b
end
variable [HasImageMap sq]
/-- The map on images induced by a commutative square. -/
abbrev image.map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom :=
(HasImageMap.imageMap sq).map
theorem image.factor_map :
factorThruImage f.hom ≫ image.map sq = sq.left ≫ factorThruImage g.hom := by simp
theorem image.map_ι : image.map sq ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right := by simp
theorem image.map_homMk'_ι {X Y P Q : C} {k : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage k] {l : P ⟶ Q} [HasImage l]
{m : X ⟶ P} {n : Y ⟶ Q} (w : m ≫ l = k ≫ n) [HasImageMap (Arrow.homMk' _ _ w)] :
image.map (Arrow.homMk' _ _ w) ≫ image.ι l = image.ι k ≫ n :=
image.map_ι _
section
variable {h : Arrow C} [HasImage h.hom] (sq' : g ⟶ h)
variable [HasImageMap sq']
/-- Image maps for composable commutative squares induce an image map in the composite square. -/
def imageMapComp : ImageMap (sq ≫ sq') where map := image.map sq ≫ image.map sq'
@[simp]
theorem image.map_comp [HasImageMap (sq ≫ sq')] :
image.map (sq ≫ sq') = image.map sq ≫ image.map sq' :=
show (HasImageMap.imageMap (sq ≫ sq')).map = (imageMapComp sq sq').map by
congr; simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end
section
variable (f)
/-- The identity `image f ⟶ image f` fits into the commutative square represented by the identity
morphism `𝟙 f` in the arrow category. -/
def imageMapId : ImageMap (𝟙 f) where map := 𝟙 (image f.hom)
@[simp]
theorem image.map_id [HasImageMap (𝟙 f)] : image.map (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 (image f.hom) :=
show (HasImageMap.imageMap (𝟙 f)).map = (imageMapId f).map by
congr; simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end
end HasImageMap
section
variable (C) [HasImages C]
/-- If a category `has_image_maps`, then all commutative squares induce morphisms on images. -/
class HasImageMaps : Prop where
has_image_map : ∀ {f g : Arrow C} (st : f ⟶ g), HasImageMap st
attribute [instance 100] HasImageMaps.has_image_map
end
section HasImageMaps
variable [HasImages C] [HasImageMaps C]
/-- The functor from the arrow category of `C` to `C` itself that maps a morphism to its image
and a commutative square to the induced morphism on images. -/
@[simps]
def im : Arrow C ⥤ C where
obj f := image f.hom
map st := image.map st
end HasImageMaps
section StrongEpiMonoFactorisation
/-- A strong epi-mono factorisation is a decomposition `f = e ≫ m` with `e` a strong epimorphism
and `m` a monomorphism. -/
structure StrongEpiMonoFactorisation {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) extends MonoFactorisation f where
[e_strong_epi : StrongEpi e]
attribute [inherit_doc StrongEpiMonoFactorisation] StrongEpiMonoFactorisation.e_strong_epi
attribute [instance] StrongEpiMonoFactorisation.e_strong_epi
/-- Satisfying the inhabited linter -/
instance strongEpiMonoFactorisationInhabited {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [StrongEpi f] :
Inhabited (StrongEpiMonoFactorisation f) :=
⟨⟨⟨Y, 𝟙 Y, f, by simp⟩⟩⟩
| /-- A mono factorisation coming from a strong epi-mono factorisation always has the universal
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Images.lean | 797 | 797 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Intervals in `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
In this file we prove various lemmas about `Set.image`s and `Set.preimage`s of intervals under
`some : α → WithTop α` and `some : α → WithBot α`.
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### `WithTop` -/
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio ⊤ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a ⊤ = Ici a := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a ⊤ = Ioi a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioi a = Ioo (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ici a = Ico (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ici_inter_Iio]
|
theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iio a = Iio (a : WithTop α) := by
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 80 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.EvenOddRec
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Elliptic divisibility sequences
This file defines the type of an elliptic divisibility sequence (EDS) and a few examples.
## Mathematical background
Let `R` be a commutative ring. An elliptic sequence is a sequence `W : ℤ → R` satisfying
`W(m + n)W(m - n)W(r)² = W(m + r)W(m - r)W(n)² - W(n + r)W(n - r)W(m)²` for any `m, n, r ∈ ℤ`.
A divisibility sequence is a sequence `W : ℤ → R` satisfying `W(m) ∣ W(n)` for any `m, n ∈ ℤ` such
that `m ∣ n`. An elliptic divisibility sequence is simply a divisibility sequence that is elliptic.
Some examples of EDSs include
* the identity sequence,
* certain terms of Lucas sequences, and
* division polynomials of elliptic curves.
## Main definitions
* `IsEllSequence`: a sequence indexed by integers is an elliptic sequence.
* `IsDivSequence`: a sequence indexed by integers is a divisibility sequence.
* `IsEllDivSequence`: a sequence indexed by integers is an EDS.
* `preNormEDS'`: the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS indexed by `ℕ`.
* `preNormEDS`: the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS indexed by `ℤ`.
* `normEDS`: the canonical example of a normalised EDS indexed by `ℤ`.
## Main statements
* TODO: prove that `normEDS` satisfies `IsEllDivSequence`.
* TODO: prove that a normalised sequence satisfying `IsEllDivSequence` can be given by `normEDS`.
## Implementation notes
The normalised EDS `normEDS b c d n` is defined in terms of the auxiliary sequence
`preNormEDS (b ^ 4) c d n`, which are equal when `n` is odd, and which differ by a factor of `b`
when `n` is even. This coincides with the definition in the references since both agree for
`normEDS b c d 2` and for `normEDS b c d 4`, and the correct factors of `b` are removed in
`normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 2) + 1)` and in `normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`.
One reason is to avoid the necessity for ring division by `b` in the inductive definition of
`normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`. The idea is that, it can be shown that `normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`
always contains a factor of `b`, so it is possible to remove a factor of `b` *a posteriori*, but
stating this lemma requires first defining `normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`, which requires having this
factor of `b` *a priori*. Another reason is to allow the definition of univariate `n`-division
polynomials of elliptic curves, omitting a factor of the bivariate `2`-division polynomial.
## References
M Ward, *Memoir on Elliptic Divisibility Sequences*
## Tags
elliptic, divisibility, sequence
-/
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
section IsEllDivSequence
variable (W : ℤ → R)
/-- The proposition that a sequence indexed by integers is an elliptic sequence. -/
def IsEllSequence : Prop :=
∀ m n r : ℤ, W (m + n) * W (m - n) * W r ^ 2 =
W (m + r) * W (m - r) * W n ^ 2 - W (n + r) * W (n - r) * W m ^ 2
/-- The proposition that a sequence indexed by integers is a divisibility sequence. -/
def IsDivSequence : Prop :=
∀ m n : ℕ, m ∣ n → W m ∣ W n
/-- The proposition that a sequence indexed by integers is an EDS. -/
| def IsEllDivSequence : Prop :=
IsEllSequence W ∧ IsDivSequence W
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/EllipticDivisibilitySequence.lean | 83 | 84 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Martin Zinkevich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Martin Zinkevich
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Finite
/-!
# Subtraction of measures
In this file we define `μ - ν` to be the least measure `τ` such that `μ ≤ τ + ν`.
It is the equivalent of `(μ - ν) ⊔ 0` if `μ` and `ν` were signed measures.
Compare with `ENNReal.instSub`.
Specifically, note that if you have `α = {1,2}`, and `μ {1} = 2`, `μ {2} = 0`, and
`ν {2} = 2`, `ν {1} = 0`, then `(μ - ν) {1, 2} = 2`. However, if `μ ≤ ν`, and
`ν univ ≠ ∞`, then `(μ - ν) + ν = μ`.
-/
open Set
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- The measure `μ - ν` is defined to be the least measure `τ` such that `μ ≤ τ + ν`.
It is the equivalent of `(μ - ν) ⊔ 0` if `μ` and `ν` were signed measures.
Compare with `ENNReal.instSub`.
Specifically, note that if you have `α = {1,2}`, and `μ {1} = 2`, `μ {2} = 0`, and
`ν {2} = 2`, `ν {1} = 0`, then `(μ - ν) {1, 2} = 2`. However, if `μ ≤ ν`, and
`ν univ ≠ ∞`, then `(μ - ν) + ν = μ`. -/
noncomputable instance instSub {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] : Sub (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => sInf { τ | μ ≤ τ + ν }⟩
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} {s : Set α}
theorem sub_def : μ - ν = sInf { d | μ ≤ d + ν } := rfl
theorem sub_le_of_le_add {d} (h : μ ≤ d + ν) : μ - ν ≤ d :=
sInf_le h
theorem sub_eq_zero_of_le (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ - ν = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero'.1 <| sub_le_of_le_add <| by rwa [zero_add]
theorem sub_le : μ - ν ≤ μ :=
sub_le_of_le_add <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_top : μ - ⊤ = 0 :=
sub_eq_zero_of_le le_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub : 0 - μ = 0 :=
sub_eq_zero_of_le μ.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem sub_self : μ - μ = 0 :=
sub_eq_zero_of_le le_rfl
/-- This application lemma only works in special circumstances. Given knowledge of
when `μ ≤ ν` and `ν ≤ μ`, a more general application lemma can be written. -/
theorem sub_apply [IsFiniteMeasure ν] (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h₂ : ν ≤ μ) :
(μ - ν) s = μ s - ν s := by
-- We begin by defining `measure_sub`, which will be equal to `(μ - ν)`.
let measure_sub : Measure α := MeasureTheory.Measure.ofMeasurable
(fun (t : Set α) (_ : MeasurableSet t) => μ t - ν t) (by simp)
(fun g h_meas h_disj ↦ by
simp only [measure_iUnion h_disj h_meas]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_sub _ (h₂ <| g ·)]
rw [← measure_iUnion h_disj h_meas]
apply measure_ne_top)
-- Now, we demonstrate `μ - ν = measure_sub`, and apply it.
have h_measure_sub_add : ν + measure_sub = μ := by
ext1 t h_t_measurable_set
simp only [Pi.add_apply, coe_add]
rw [MeasureTheory.Measure.ofMeasurable_apply _ h_t_measurable_set, add_comm,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₂ t)]
have h_measure_sub_eq : μ - ν = measure_sub := by
rw [MeasureTheory.Measure.sub_def]
apply le_antisymm
· apply sInf_le
simp [le_refl, add_comm, h_measure_sub_add]
apply le_sInf
intro d h_d
rw [← h_measure_sub_add, mem_setOf_eq, add_comm d] at h_d
apply Measure.le_of_add_le_add_left h_d
rw [h_measure_sub_eq]
apply Measure.ofMeasurable_apply _ h₁
theorem sub_add_cancel_of_le [IsFiniteMeasure ν] (h₁ : ν ≤ μ) : μ - ν + ν = μ := by
ext1 s h_s_meas
rw [add_apply, sub_apply h_s_meas h₁, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₁ s)]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_sub_cancel [IsFiniteMeasure ν] : μ + ν - ν = μ := by
ext1 s hs
rw [sub_apply hs (Measure.le_add_left (le_refl _)), add_apply,
ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_right (measure_ne_top ν s)]
theorem restrict_sub_eq_restrict_sub_restrict (h_meas_s : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ - ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s - ν.restrict s := by
repeat rw [sub_def]
have h_nonempty : { d | μ ≤ d + ν }.Nonempty := ⟨μ, Measure.le_add_right le_rfl⟩
rw [restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict h_nonempty h_meas_s]
apply le_antisymm
· refine sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le ?_
intro ν' h_ν'_in
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at h_ν'_in
refine ⟨ν'.restrict s, ?_, restrict_le_self⟩
refine ⟨ν' + (⊤ : Measure α).restrict sᶜ, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_setOf_eq, add_right_comm, Measure.le_iff]
intro t h_meas_t
repeat rw [← measure_inter_add_diff t h_meas_s]
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_
· rw [add_apply, add_apply]
apply le_add_right _
rw [← restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right,
← restrict_eq_self ν inter_subset_right]
apply h_ν'_in
· rw [add_apply, restrict_apply (h_meas_t.diff h_meas_s), diff_eq, inter_assoc, inter_self,
← add_apply]
have h_mu_le_add_top : μ ≤ ν' + ν + ⊤ := by simp only [add_top, le_top]
exact Measure.le_iff'.1 h_mu_le_add_top _
· ext1 t h_meas_t
simp [restrict_apply h_meas_t, restrict_apply (h_meas_t.inter h_meas_s), inter_assoc]
· refine sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le ?_
refine forall_mem_image.2 fun t h_t_in => ⟨t.restrict s, ?_, le_rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← restrict_add]
exact restrict_mono Subset.rfl h_t_in
theorem sub_apply_eq_zero_of_restrict_le_restrict (h_le : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s)
(h_meas_s : MeasurableSet s) : (μ - ν) s = 0 := by
rw [← restrict_apply_self, restrict_sub_eq_restrict_sub_restrict, sub_eq_zero_of_le] <;> simp [*]
instance isFiniteMeasure_sub [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : IsFiniteMeasure (μ - ν) :=
isFiniteMeasure_of_le μ sub_le
| end Measure
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Sub.lean | 137 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : #{a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : #(insert a s) = if a ∈ s then #s else #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : #{a, b} = 1 ∨ #{a, b} = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : #{a, b} = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) = #s - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) + 1 = #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) < #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : #(s.erase a) ≤ #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : #s - 1 ≤ #(s.erase a) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : #(s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then #s - 1 else #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : #(range n) = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : #s.attach = #s :=
Multiset.card_attach
end Finset
open scoped Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : #m.toFinset = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : #m.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
#m.toFinset = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
#m.toFinset = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : #l.toFinset = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : #l.toFinset ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : #l.toFinset = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t u : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = #s := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : #(s.image f) = #s := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : #(s.image f) = #s) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) = #s ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
#(s.image f) = #s :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
#(s.filter fun x ↦ f x = y) ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
#(s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < #s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun _ hx ↦ Multiset.subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : #(s.map f) = #s :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
#(s.subtype p) = #(s.filter p) := by simp [Finset.subtype]
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) ≤ #s :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : #t ≤ #s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
theorem eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst, (ge_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ·)⟩
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : #t ≤ #s) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
theorem eq_iff_card_ge_of_superset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ t = s :=
(eq_iff_card_le_of_subset hst).trans eq_comm
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : #t ≤ #s) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
theorem card_filter_eq_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = #s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
rw [(card_filter_le s p).eq_iff_not_lt, not_lt, eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (filter_subset p s),
filter_eq_self]
alias ⟨filter_card_eq, _⟩ := card_filter_eq_iff
theorem card_filter_eq_zero_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x := by
rw [card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : #s < #t := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : #s = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
#s = #((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) := by rw [this]
_ = #(range n).attach := ?_
_ = #(range n) := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : #s = #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #s.attach := card_attach.symm
_ = #(s.attach.image fun a ↦ i a.1 a.2) := Eq.symm ?_
_ = #t := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : #s = #t := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : #s = #t :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : #s = #t :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : #s = #t := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
#s = #t := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
lemma card_le_card_of_injOn (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn f) :
#s ≤ #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #(s.image f) := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ #t := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {f : s → t} (hf : f.Injective) : #s ≤ #t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩
· simp
· classical
let f' : α → β := fun a => f (if ha : a ∈ s then ⟨a, ha⟩ else ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩)
apply card_le_card_of_injOn f'
· aesop
· intro a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂ haa
rw [mem_coe] at ha₁ ha₂
simp only [f', ha₁, ha₂, ← Subtype.ext_iff] at haa
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (hf haa)
lemma card_le_card_of_surjOn (f : α → β) (hf : Set.SurjOn f s t) : #t ≤ #s := by
classical unfold Set.SurjOn at hf; exact (card_le_card (mod_cast hf)).trans card_image_le
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : #t < #s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_injOn f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ #s :=
calc
n = #(range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ #s := card_le_card_of_injOn f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa)
| lemma surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hinj : Set.InjOn f s)
(hst : #t ≤ #s) : Set.SurjOn f s t := by
classical
suffices s.image f = t by simp [← this, Set.SurjOn]
have : s.image f ⊆ t := by aesop (add simp Finset.subset_iff)
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 433 | 437 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Gabin Kolly
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.FinitelyGenerated
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Quotients
import Mathlib.Order.DirectedInverseSystem
/-!
# Direct Limits of First-Order Structures
This file constructs the direct limit of a directed system of first-order embeddings.
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit G f` is the direct limit of the directed system `f` of
first-order embeddings between the structures indexed by `G`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit.lift` is the universal property of the direct limit: maps
from the components to another module that respect the directed system structure give rise to
a unique map out of the direct limit.
- `FirstOrder.Language.DirectLimit.equiv_lift` is the equivalence between limits of
isomorphic direct systems.
-/
universe v w w' u₁ u₂
open FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure Set
variable {L : Language} {ι : Type v} [Preorder ι]
variable {G : ι → Type w} [∀ i, L.Structure (G i)]
variable (f : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → G i ↪[L] G j)
namespace DirectedSystem
alias map_self := DirectedSystem.map_self'
alias map_map := DirectedSystem.map_map'
variable {G' : ℕ → Type w} [∀ i, L.Structure (G' i)] (f' : ∀ n : ℕ, G' n ↪[L] G' (n + 1))
/-- Given a chain of embeddings of structures indexed by `ℕ`, defines a `DirectedSystem` by
composing them. -/
def natLERec (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) : G' m ↪[L] G' n :=
Nat.leRecOn h (@fun k g => (f' k).comp g) (Embedding.refl L _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_natLERec (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(natLERec f' m n h : G' m → G' n) = Nat.leRecOn h (@fun k => f' k) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
ext x
induction' k with k ih
· -- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [natLERec, Nat.leRecOn_self, Embedding.refl_apply, Nat.leRecOn_self]
· -- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [Nat.leRecOn_succ le_self_add, natLERec, Nat.leRecOn_succ le_self_add, ← natLERec,
Embedding.comp_apply, ih]
instance natLERec.directedSystem : DirectedSystem G' fun i j h => natLERec f' i j h :=
⟨fun _ _ => congr (congr rfl (Nat.leRecOn_self _)) rfl,
fun _ _ _ hij hjk => by simp [Nat.leRecOn_trans hij hjk]⟩
end DirectedSystem
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- Alias for `Σ i, G i`.
Instead of `Σ i, G i`, we use the alias `Language.Structure.Sigma` which depends on `f`.
This way, Lean can infer what `L` and `f` are in the `Setoid` instance.
Otherwise we have a "cannot find synthesization order" error.
See also the discussion at
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/local.20instance.20cannot.20find.20synthesization.20order.20in.20porting
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
protected abbrev Structure.Sigma (f : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → G i ↪[L] G j) := Σ i, G i
local notation "Σˣ" => Structure.Sigma
/-- Constructor for `FirstOrder.Language.Structure.Sigma` alias. -/
abbrev Structure.Sigma.mk (i : ι) (x : G i) : Σˣ f := ⟨i, x⟩
namespace DirectLimit
/-- Raises a family of elements in the `Σ`-type to the same level along the embeddings. -/
def unify {α : Type*} (x : α → Σˣ f) (i : ι) (h : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x)))
(a : α) : G i :=
f (x a).1 i (h (mem_range_self a)) (x a).2
variable [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h]
@[simp]
theorem unify_sigma_mk_self {α : Type*} {i : ι} {x : α → G i} :
(unify f (fun a => .mk f i (x a)) i fun _ ⟨_, hj⟩ =>
_root_.trans (le_of_eq hj.symm) (refl _)) = x := by
ext a
rw [unify]
apply DirectedSystem.map_self
theorem comp_unify {α : Type*} {x : α → Σˣ f} {i j : ι} (ij : i ≤ j)
(h : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
f i j ij ∘ unify f x i h = unify f x j
fun k hk => _root_.trans (mem_upperBounds.1 h k hk) ij := by
ext a
simp [unify, DirectedSystem.map_map]
end DirectLimit
variable (G)
namespace DirectLimit
/-- The directed limit glues together the structures along the embeddings. -/
def setoid [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] : Setoid (Σˣ f) where
r := fun ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ => ∃ (k : ι) (ik : i ≤ k) (jk : j ≤ k), f i k ik x = f j k jk y
iseqv :=
⟨fun ⟨i, _⟩ => ⟨i, refl i, refl i, rfl⟩, @fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨k, ik, jk, h⟩ =>
⟨k, jk, ik, h.symm⟩,
@fun ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ ⟨k, z⟩ ⟨ij, hiij, hjij, hij⟩ ⟨jk, hjjk, hkjk, hjk⟩ => by
obtain ⟨ijk, hijijk, hjkijk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) ij jk
refine ⟨ijk, le_trans hiij hijijk, le_trans hkjk hjkijk, ?_⟩
rw [← DirectedSystem.map_map, hij, DirectedSystem.map_map]
· symm
rw [← DirectedSystem.map_map, ← hjk, DirectedSystem.map_map]
assumption
assumption⟩
/-- The structure on the `Σ`-type which becomes the structure on the direct limit after quotienting.
-/
noncomputable def sigmaStructure [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Nonempty ι] : L.Structure (Σˣ f) where
funMap F x :=
⟨_,
funMap F
(unify f x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1))
(Classical.choose_spec (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)))⟩
RelMap R x :=
RelMap R
(unify f x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1))
(Classical.choose_spec (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)))
end DirectLimit
/-- The direct limit of a directed system is the structures glued together along the embeddings. -/
def DirectLimit [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] :=
Quotient (DirectLimit.setoid G f)
attribute [local instance] DirectLimit.setoid DirectLimit.sigmaStructure
instance [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Inhabited ι]
[Inhabited (G default)] : Inhabited (DirectLimit G f) :=
⟨⟦⟨default, default⟩⟧⟩
namespace DirectLimit
variable [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [DirectedSystem G fun i j h => f i j h]
theorem equiv_iff {x y : Σˣ f} {i : ι} (hx : x.1 ≤ i) (hy : y.1 ≤ i) :
x ≈ y ↔ (f x.1 i hx) x.2 = (f y.1 i hy) y.2 := by
cases x
cases y
refine ⟨fun xy => ?_, fun xy => ⟨i, hx, hy, xy⟩⟩
obtain ⟨j, _, _, h⟩ := xy
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j
have h := congr_arg (f j k jk) h
apply (f i k ik).injective
rw [DirectedSystem.map_map, DirectedSystem.map_map] at *
exact h
theorem funMap_unify_equiv {n : ℕ} (F : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i j : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) (hj : j ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
Structure.Sigma.mk f i (funMap F (unify f x i hi)) ≈ .mk f j (funMap F (unify f x j hj)) := by
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j
refine ⟨k, ik, jk, ?_⟩
rw [(f i k ik).map_fun, (f j k jk).map_fun, comp_unify, comp_unify]
theorem relMap_unify_equiv {n : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i j : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) (hj : j ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
RelMap R (unify f x i hi) = RelMap R (unify f x j hj) := by
obtain ⟨k, ik, jk⟩ := directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j
rw [← (f i k ik).map_rel, comp_unify, ← (f j k jk).map_rel, comp_unify]
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem exists_unify_eq {α : Type*} [Finite α] {x y : α → Σˣ f} (xy : x ≈ y) :
∃ (i : ι) (hx : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x)))
(hy : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ y))), unify f x i hx = unify f y i hy := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Finite.bddAbove_range (Sum.elim (fun a => (x a).1) fun a => (y a).1)
rw [Sum.elim_range, upperBounds_union] at hi
simp_rw [← Function.comp_apply (f := Sigma.fst)] at hi
exact ⟨i, hi.1, hi.2, funext fun a => (equiv_iff G f _ _).1 (xy a)⟩
| theorem funMap_equiv_unify {n : ℕ} (F : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i : ι)
(hi : i ∈ upperBounds (range (Sigma.fst ∘ x))) :
funMap F x ≈ .mk f _ (funMap F (unify f x i hi)) :=
funMap_unify_equiv G f F x (Classical.choose (Finite.bddAbove_range fun a => (x a).1)) i _ hi
theorem relMap_equiv_unify {n : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → Σˣ f) (i : ι)
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/DirectLimit.lean | 199 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Center
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Centralizer
/-!
# Centralizers of subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G']
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
/-- The `centralizer` of `s` is the subgroup of `g : G` commuting with every `h : s`. -/
@[to_additive
"The `centralizer` of `s` is the additive subgroup of `g : G` commuting with every `h : s`."]
def centralizer (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
{ Submonoid.centralizer s with
carrier := Set.centralizer s
inv_mem' := Set.inv_mem_centralizer }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_centralizer_iff {g : G} {s : Set G} : g ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ h ∈ s, h * g = g * h :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_centralizer_iff_commutator_eq_one {g : G} {s : Set G} :
g ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ h ∈ s, h * g * h⁻¹ * g⁻¹ = 1 := by
simp only [mem_centralizer_iff, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, one_mul]
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_centralizer_singleton_iff {g k : G} :
k ∈ Subgroup.centralizer {g} ↔ k * g = g * k := by
| simp only [mem_centralizer_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
exact eq_comm
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Centralizer.lean | 42 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Graph
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
/-! ### Products of modules
This file defines constructors for linear maps whose domains or codomains are products.
It contains theorems relating these to each other, as well as to `Submodule.prod`, `Submodule.map`,
`Submodule.comap`, `LinearMap.range`, and `LinearMap.ker`.
## Main definitions
- products in the domain:
- `LinearMap.fst`
- `LinearMap.snd`
- `LinearMap.coprod`
- `LinearMap.prod_ext`
- products in the codomain:
- `LinearMap.inl`
- `LinearMap.inr`
- `LinearMap.prod`
- products in both domain and codomain:
- `LinearMap.prodMap`
- `LinearEquiv.prodMap`
- `LinearEquiv.skewProd`
-/
universe u v w x y z u' v' w' y'
variable {R : Type u} {K : Type u'} {M : Type v} {V : Type v'} {M₂ : Type w} {V₂ : Type w'}
variable {M₃ : Type y} {V₃ : Type y'} {M₄ : Type z} {ι : Type x}
variable {M₅ M₆ : Type*}
section Prod
namespace LinearMap
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₅] [AddCommMonoid M₆]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
variable [Module R M₅] [Module R M₆]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
section
variable (R M M₂)
/-- The first projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M where
toFun := Prod.fst
map_add' _x _y := rfl
map_smul' _x _y := rfl
/-- The second projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun := Prod.snd
map_add' _x _y := rfl
map_smul' _x _y := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_apply (x : M × M₂) : fst R M M₂ x = x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_apply (x : M × M₂) : snd R M M₂ x = x.2 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : ⇑(fst R M M₂) = Prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : ⇑(snd R M M₂) = Prod.snd := rfl
theorem fst_surjective : Function.Surjective (fst R M M₂) := fun x => ⟨(x, 0), rfl⟩
theorem snd_surjective : Function.Surjective (snd R M M₂) := fun x => ⟨(0, x), rfl⟩
/-- The prod of two linear maps is a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ where
toFun := Pi.prod f g
map_add' x y := by simp only [Pi.prod, Prod.mk_add_mk, map_add]
map_smul' c x := by simp only [Pi.prod, Prod.smul_mk, map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
theorem coe_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : ⇑(f.prod g) = Pi.prod f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (fst R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (snd R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem pair_fst_snd : prod (fst R M M₂) (snd R M M₂) = LinearMap.id := rfl
theorem prod_comp (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄)
(h : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (f.prod g).comp h = (f.comp h).prod (g.comp h) :=
rfl
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same domain is equivalent to taking the product of
their codomains.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def prodEquiv [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] :
((M →ₗ[R] M₂) × (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) ≃ₗ[S] M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f := ((fst _ _ _).comp f, (snd _ _ _).comp f)
left_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
section
variable (R M M₂)
/-- The left injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inl : M →ₗ[R] M × M₂ :=
prod LinearMap.id 0
/-- The right injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inr : M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ :=
prod 0 LinearMap.id
theorem range_inl : range (inl R M M₂) = ker (snd R M M₂) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_ker, mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rfl
· intro h
exact ⟨x.fst, Prod.ext rfl h.symm⟩
theorem ker_snd : ker (snd R M M₂) = range (inl R M M₂) :=
Eq.symm <| range_inl R M M₂
theorem range_inr : range (inr R M M₂) = ker (fst R M M₂) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_ker, mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rfl
· intro h
exact ⟨x.snd, Prod.ext h.symm rfl⟩
theorem ker_fst : ker (fst R M M₂) = range (inr R M M₂) :=
Eq.symm <| range_inr R M M₂
@[simp] theorem fst_comp_inl : fst R M M₂ ∘ₗ inl R M M₂ = id := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_comp_inl : snd R M M₂ ∘ₗ inl R M M₂ = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fst_comp_inr : fst R M M₂ ∘ₗ inr R M M₂ = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_comp_inr : snd R M M₂ ∘ₗ inr R M M₂ = id := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem coe_inl : (inl R M M₂ : M → M × M₂) = fun x => (x, 0) :=
rfl
theorem inl_apply (x : M) : inl R M M₂ x = (x, 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inr : (inr R M M₂ : M₂ → M × M₂) = Prod.mk 0 :=
rfl
theorem inr_apply (x : M₂) : inr R M M₂ x = (0, x) :=
rfl
theorem inl_eq_prod : inl R M M₂ = prod LinearMap.id 0 :=
rfl
theorem inr_eq_prod : inr R M M₂ = prod 0 LinearMap.id :=
rfl
theorem inl_injective : Function.Injective (inl R M M₂) := fun _ => by simp
theorem inr_injective : Function.Injective (inr R M M₂) := fun _ => by simp
/-- The coprod function `x : M × M₂ ↦ f x.1 + g x.2` is a linear map. -/
def coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ :=
f.comp (fst _ _ _) + g.comp (snd _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem coprod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M × M₂) :
coprod f g x = f x.1 + g x.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inl (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (coprod f g).comp (inl R M M₂) = f := by
ext; simp only [map_zero, add_zero, coprod_apply, inl_apply, comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inr (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (coprod f g).comp (inr R M M₂) = g := by
ext; simp only [map_zero, coprod_apply, inr_apply, zero_add, comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inl_inr : coprod (inl R M M₂) (inr R M M₂) = LinearMap.id := by
ext <;>
simp only [Prod.mk_add_mk, add_zero, id_apply, coprod_apply, inl_apply, inr_apply, zero_add]
theorem coprod_zero_left (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₃).coprod g = g.comp (snd R M M₂) :=
zero_add _
theorem coprod_zero_right (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : f.coprod (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) = f.comp (fst R M M₂) :=
add_zero _
theorem comp_coprod (f : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
f.comp (g₁.coprod g₂) = (f.comp g₁).coprod (f.comp g₂) :=
ext fun x => f.map_add (g₁ x.1) (g₂ x.2)
theorem fst_eq_coprod : fst R M M₂ = coprod LinearMap.id 0 := by ext; simp
theorem snd_eq_coprod : snd R M M₂ = coprod 0 LinearMap.id := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem coprod_comp_prod (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (f' : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g' : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(f.coprod g).comp (f'.prod g') = f.comp f' + g.comp g' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coprod_map_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (S : Submodule R M)
(S' : Submodule R M₂) : (Submodule.prod S S').map (LinearMap.coprod f g) = S.map f ⊔ S'.map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [LinearMap.coprod_apply, Submodule.coe_sup, Submodule.map_coe]
rw [← Set.image2_add, Set.image2_image_left, Set.image2_image_right]
exact Set.image_prod fun m m₂ => f m + g m₂
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same codomain is equivalent to taking the product of
their domains.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def coprodEquiv [Module S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] :
((M →ₗ[R] M₃) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)) ≃ₗ[S] M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ where
toFun f := f.1.coprod f.2
invFun f := (f.comp (inl _ _ _), f.comp (inr _ _ _))
left_inv f := by simp only [coprod_inl, coprod_inr]
right_inv f := by simp only [← comp_coprod, comp_id, coprod_inl_inr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp only [Prod.snd_add, add_apply, coprod_apply, Prod.fst_add, add_add_add_comm]
map_smul' r a := by
dsimp
ext
simp only [smul_add, smul_apply, Prod.smul_snd, Prod.smul_fst, coprod_apply]
theorem prod_ext_iff {f g : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} :
f = g ↔ f.comp (inl _ _ _) = g.comp (inl _ _ _) ∧ f.comp (inr _ _ _) = g.comp (inr _ _ _) :=
(coprodEquiv ℕ).symm.injective.eq_iff.symm.trans Prod.ext_iff
/--
Split equality of linear maps from a product into linear maps over each component, to allow `ext`
to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ M₃` and `M₂ →ₗ M₃`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod_ext {f g : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} (hl : f.comp (inl _ _ _) = g.comp (inl _ _ _))
(hr : f.comp (inr _ _ _) = g.comp (inr _ _ _)) : f = g :=
prod_ext_iff.2 ⟨hl, hr⟩
/-- `Prod.map` of two linear maps. -/
def prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ × M₄ :=
(f.comp (fst R M M₂)).prod (g.comp (snd R M M₂))
theorem coe_prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : ⇑(f.prodMap g) = Prod.map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) : f.prodMap g x = (f x.1, g x.2) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_comap_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (S : Submodule R M₂)
(S' : Submodule R M₄) :
(Submodule.prod S S').comap (LinearMap.prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
theorem ker_prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
ker (LinearMap.prodMap f g) = Submodule.prod (ker f) (ker g) := by
dsimp only [ker]
rw [← prodMap_comap_prod, Submodule.prod_bot]
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_id : (id : M →ₗ[R] M).prodMap (id : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_one : (1 : M →ₗ[R] M).prodMap (1 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_comp (f₁₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (f₂₃ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₁₂ : M₄ →ₗ[R] M₅)
(g₂₃ : M₅ →ₗ[R] M₆) :
f₂₃.prodMap g₂₃ ∘ₗ f₁₂.prodMap g₁₂ = (f₂₃ ∘ₗ f₁₂).prodMap (g₂₃ ∘ₗ g₁₂) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_mul (f₁₂ : M →ₗ[R] M) (f₂₃ : M →ₗ[R] M) (g₁₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) (g₂₃ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
f₂₃.prodMap g₂₃ * f₁₂.prodMap g₁₂ = (f₂₃ * f₁₂).prodMap (g₂₃ * g₁₂) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_add (f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₁ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
(f₁ + f₂).prodMap (g₁ + g₂) = f₁.prodMap g₁ + f₂.prodMap g₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_zero : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prodMap (0 : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_smul [DistribMulAction S M₃] [DistribMulAction S M₄] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₄] (s : S) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
prodMap (s • f) (s • g) = s • prodMap f g :=
rfl
variable (R M M₂ M₃ M₄)
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def prodMapLinear [Module S M₃] [Module S M₄] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₄] :
(M →ₗ[R] M₃) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) →ₗ[S] M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ × M₄ where
toFun f := prodMap f.1 f.2
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def prodMapRingHom : (M →ₗ[R] M) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) →+* M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ where
toFun f := prodMap f.1 f.2
map_one' := prodMap_one
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
variable {R M M₂ M₃ M₄}
section map_mul
variable {A : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable {B : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
theorem inl_map_mul (a₁ a₂ : A) :
LinearMap.inl R A B (a₁ * a₂) = LinearMap.inl R A B a₁ * LinearMap.inl R A B a₂ :=
Prod.ext rfl (by simp)
theorem inr_map_mul (b₁ b₂ : B) :
LinearMap.inr R A B (b₁ * b₂) = LinearMap.inr R A B b₁ * LinearMap.inr R A B b₂ :=
Prod.ext (by simp) rfl
end map_mul
end LinearMap
end Prod
namespace LinearMap
variable (R M M₂)
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps!]
def prodMapAlgHom : Module.End R M × Module.End R M₂ →ₐ[R] Module.End R (M × M₂) :=
{ prodMapRingHom R M M₂ with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
[Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
theorem range_coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (f.coprod g) = range f ⊔ range g :=
Submodule.ext fun x => by simp [mem_sup]
theorem isCompl_range_inl_inr : IsCompl (range <| inl R M M₂) (range <| inr R M M₂) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_def]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, inl_apply, inr_apply, mem_bot] at hx hy ⊢
exact ⟨hy.1.symm, hx.2.symm⟩
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ -
simp only [mem_sup, mem_range, exists_prop]
refine ⟨(x, 0), ⟨x, rfl⟩, (0, y), ⟨y, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
simp
theorem sup_range_inl_inr : (range <| inl R M M₂) ⊔ (range <| inr R M M₂) = ⊤ :=
IsCompl.sup_eq_top isCompl_range_inl_inr
theorem disjoint_inl_inr : Disjoint (range <| inl R M M₂) (range <| inr R M M₂) := by
simp +contextual [disjoint_def, @eq_comm M 0, @eq_comm M₂ 0]
theorem map_coprod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : Submodule R M)
(q : Submodule R M₂) : map (coprod f g) (p.prod q) = map f p ⊔ map g q := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 ?_) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 ?_))
· rw [SetLike.le_def]
rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, h₂, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
· exact fun x hx => ⟨(x, 0), by simp [hx]⟩
· exact fun x hx => ⟨(0, x), by simp [hx]⟩
theorem comap_prod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(q : Submodule R M₃) : comap (prod f g) (p.prod q) = comap f p ⊓ comap g q :=
Submodule.ext fun _x => Iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_inf_comap (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.comap (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) ⊓ q.comap (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) :=
Submodule.ext fun _x => Iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_sup_map (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.map (LinearMap.inl R M M₂) ⊔ q.map (LinearMap.inr R M M₂) := by
rw [← map_coprod_prod, coprod_inl_inr, map_id]
theorem span_inl_union_inr {s : Set M} {t : Set M₂} :
span R (inl R M M₂ '' s ∪ inr R M M₂ '' t) = (span R s).prod (span R t) := by
rw [span_union, prod_eq_sup_map, ← span_image, ← span_image]
@[simp]
theorem ker_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker (prod f g) = ker f ⊓ ker g := by
rw [ker, ← prod_bot, comap_prod_prod]; rfl
theorem range_prod_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
range (prod f g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) := by
simp only [SetLike.le_def, prod_apply, mem_range, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_prod, exists_imp]
rintro _ x rfl
exact ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem ker_prod_ker_le_ker_coprod {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂] {M₃ : Type*}
| [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(ker f).prod (ker g) ≤ ker (f.coprod g) := by
rintro ⟨y, z⟩
simp +contextual
theorem ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] {M₃ : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(hd : Disjoint (range f) (range g)) : ker (f.coprod g) = (ker f).prod (ker g) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (ker_prod_ker_le_ker_coprod f g)
rintro ⟨y, z⟩ h
simp only [mem_ker, mem_prod, coprod_apply] at h ⊢
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Prod.lean | 445 | 455 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Complete
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each `Lᵖ` Borel measurable function can be approximated in `Lᵖ` norm
by a sequence of simple functions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Lp.simpleFunc`, the type of `Lp` simple functions
* `coeToLp`, the embedding of `Lp.simpleFunc E p μ` into `Lp E p μ`
## Main results
* `tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm` (Lᵖ convergence): If `E` is a `NormedAddCommGroup` and `f` is
measurable and `MemLp` (for `p < ∞`), then the simple functions
`SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf s 0 h₀ n` may be considered as elements of `Lp E p μ`, and they tend
in Lᵖ to `f`.
* `Lp.simpleFunc.isDenseEmbedding`: the embedding `coeToLp` of the `Lp` simple functions into
`Lp` is dense.
* `Lp.simpleFunc.induction`, `Lp.induction`, `MemLp.induction`, `Integrable.induction`: to prove
a predicate for all elements of one of these classes of functions, it suffices to check that it
behaves correctly on simple functions.
## TODO
For `E` finite-dimensional, simple functions `α →ₛ E` are dense in L^∞ -- prove this.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ β` (local notation): the type of simple functions `α → β`.
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`: the type of `L1` simple functions `α → β`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric Finset
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ι E F 𝕜 : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
/-! ### Lp approximation by simple functions -/
section Lp
variable [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
{q : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem nnnorm_approxOn_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
{y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f x - y₀‖₊ := by
have := edist_approxOn_le hf h₀ x n
rw [edist_comm y₀] at this
simp only [edist_nndist, nndist_eq_nnnorm] at this
exact mod_cast this
theorem norm_approxOn_y₀_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
{y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x - y₀‖ ≤ ‖f x - y₀‖ + ‖f x - y₀‖ := by
simpa [enorm, edist_eq_enorm_sub, ← ENNReal.coe_add, norm_sub_rev]
using edist_approxOn_y0_le hf h₀ x n
theorem norm_approxOn_zero_le [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set E}
(h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (x : β) (n : ℕ) :
‖approxOn f hf s 0 h₀ n x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ + ‖f x‖ := by
simpa [enorm, edist_eq_enorm_sub, ← ENNReal.coe_add, norm_sub_rev]
using edist_approxOn_y0_le hf h₀ x n
|
theorem tendsto_approxOn_Lp_eLpNorm [OpensMeasurableSpace E] {f : β → E} (hf : Measurable f)
{s : Set E} {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {μ : Measure β}
(hμ : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) (hi : eLpNorm (fun x => f x - y₀) p μ < ∞) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (⇑(approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n) - f) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFuncDenseLp.lean | 85 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hy, _, hy, ?_⟩
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_one]; simp
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_zero]; simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, vsub_self]
module
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₃₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide z x :=
h.symm.wOppSide₁₃ hy
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
@[simp]
theorem wOppSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} : s.WOppSide x x ↔ x ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, -, -, -, h₁, -⟩ := h.exists_eq_smul_add
rw [add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at h₁
rw [h₁]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem a hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact fun h => ⟨x, h, x, h, SameRay.rfl⟩
theorem not_sOppSide_self (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x : P) : ¬s.SOppSide x x := by
rw [SOppSide]
simp
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← hr, smul_smul, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr₂.ne.symm,
← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wSameSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [SSameSide, and_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_iff_exists_left h, ← and_assoc, and_comm (a := y ∉ s), and_assoc]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(-r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right x p₁ p₁']
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) hr
ring
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wOppSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h]
constructor
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_right h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
and_congr_right_iff]
rintro _ hy
rw [or_iff_right hy]
theorem WSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SSameSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sSameSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.wSameSide.trans_sSameSide hyz, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem SSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.wSameSide.trans_wOppSide hyz hxy.2.2
theorem SSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem WOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_wOppSide hxy.symm hy).symm
theorem WOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wSameSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
rw [← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at hyz
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h ▸ hp₂)
theorem WOppSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WSameSide x y ∧ s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ y ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ho⟩
rw [wOppSide_comm] at ho
by_contra h
rw [not_or] at h
exact h.1 (wOppSide_self_iff.1 (hs.trans_wOppSide ho h.2))
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_left_mem y h, wOppSide_of_left_mem y h⟩
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_right_mem x h, wOppSide_of_right_mem x h⟩
theorem WSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h, ho.1⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact ho.2.1 hx
· exact ho.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.WOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h.1, ho⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact h.2.1 hx
· exact h.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y :=
fun ho => h.not_wOppSide ho.1
theorem WOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_wOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.WSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_sOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => h.not_wSameSide hs.1
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, Wbtw R x p y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨p, hp, h⟩ => h.wOppSide₁₃ hp⟩
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h]
exact ⟨p₁, hp₁, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [← h]
exact ⟨p₂, hp₂, wbtw_self_right _ _ _⟩
· refine ⟨lineMap x y (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)), ?_, ?_⟩
· have : (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (y -ᵥ p₂ + (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) - (x -ᵥ p₁)) + (x -ᵥ p₁) =
(r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ y]
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) (r₁ + r₂)⁻¹ • h
rw [lineMap_apply, ← vsub_vadd x p₁, ← vsub_vadd y p₂, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc,
← vadd_assoc, vadd_eq_add, this]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _
⟨by positivity,
div_le_one_of_le₀ (le_add_of_nonneg_left hr₁.le) (Left.add_pos hr₁ hr₂).le⟩
theorem SOppSide.exists_sbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
∃ p ∈ s, Sbtw R x p y := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hw⟩ := wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw.1 h.wOppSide
refine ⟨p, hp, hw, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.1 hp
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.2 hp
theorem _root_.Sbtw.sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P}
(h : Sbtw R x y z) (hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : s.SOppSide x z := by
refine ⟨h.wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ hy, hx, fun hz => hx ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rw [lineMap_apply] at hy
have ht : t ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
simp [lineMap_apply] at hyz
have hy' := vsub_mem_direction hy hz
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, ← neg_one_smul R (z -ᵥ x), ← add_smul,
← sub_eq_add_neg, s.direction.smul_mem_iff (sub_ne_zero_of_ne ht)] at hy'
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy')] at hy
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne.symm,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sSameSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sOppSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ici 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ici]
constructor
· rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, (div_pos hr₁ hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ioi 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ioi]
constructor
· rw [sSameSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, div_pos hr₁ hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_wOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iic 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iic]
constructor
· rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨-r₁ / r₂, (div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr₁) hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, neg_smul, h, smul_neg, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iio 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iio]
constructor
· rw [sOppSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨-r₁ / r₂, div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr₁) hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, neg_smul, h, smul_neg, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem wOppSide_pointReflection {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide y (pointReflection R x y) :=
(wbtw_pointReflection R _ _).wOppSide₁₃ hx
theorem sOppSide_pointReflection {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) :
s.SOppSide y (pointReflection R x y) := by
refine (sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne R fun h => hy ?_).sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem hy hx
rwa [← h]
end LinearOrderedField
section Normed
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [PseudoMetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
theorem isConnected_setOf_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (x : P) (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
IsConnected { y | s.WSameSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [wSameSide_of_left_mem, hx]
have := AddTorsor.connectedSpace V P
exact isConnected_univ
· rw [setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Ici.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_wSameSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.WSameSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_wSameSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_wSameSide x h).isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_setOf_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {x : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : IsConnected { y | s.SSameSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
rw [setOf_sSameSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Ioi.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_sSameSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.SSameSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_sSameSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [hx, SSameSide, not_true, false_and, and_false]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_sSameSide hx h).isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_setOf_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (x : P) (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
IsConnected { y | s.WOppSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [wOppSide_of_left_mem, hx]
have := AddTorsor.connectedSpace V P
exact isConnected_univ
· rw [setOf_wOppSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Iic.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_wOppSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.WOppSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_wOppSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_wOppSide x h).isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_setOf_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {x : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) : IsConnected { y | s.SOppSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
rw [setOf_sOppSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Iio.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
theorem isPreconnected_setOf_sOppSide (s : AffineSubspace ℝ P) (x : P) :
IsPreconnected { y | s.SOppSide x y } := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set P) with (h | h)
· rw [coe_eq_bot_iff] at h
simp only [h, not_sOppSide_bot]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [hx, SOppSide, not_true, false_and, and_false]
exact isPreconnected_empty
· exact (isConnected_setOf_sOppSide hx h).isPreconnected
end Normed
end AffineSubspace
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 881 | 888 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
/-!
# The category of graded objects
For any type `β`, a `β`-graded object over some category `C` is just
a function `β → C` into the objects of `C`.
We put the "pointwise" category structure on these, as the non-dependent specialization of
`CategoryTheory.Pi`.
We describe the `comap` functors obtained by precomposing with functions `β → γ`.
As a consequence a fixed element (e.g. `1`) in an additive group `β` provides a shift
functor on `β`-graded objects
When `C` has coproducts we construct the `total` functor `GradedObject β C ⥤ C`,
show that it is faithful, and deduce that when `C` is concrete so is `GradedObject β C`.
A covariant functoriality of `GradedObject β C` with respect to the index set `β` is also
introduced: if `p : I → J` is a map such that `C` has coproducts indexed by `p ⁻¹' {j}`, we
have a functor `map : GradedObject I C ⥤ GradedObject J C`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
universe w v u
/-- A type synonym for `β → C`, used for `β`-graded objects in a category `C`. -/
def GradedObject (β : Type w) (C : Type u) : Type max w u :=
β → C
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter...
instance inhabitedGradedObject (β : Type w) (C : Type u) [Inhabited C] :
Inhabited (GradedObject β C) :=
⟨fun _ => Inhabited.default⟩
-- `s` is here to distinguish type synonyms asking for different shifts
/-- A type synonym for `β → C`, used for `β`-graded objects in a category `C`
with a shift functor given by translation by `s`.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
abbrev GradedObjectWithShift {β : Type w} [AddCommGroup β] (_ : β) (C : Type u) : Type max w u :=
GradedObject β C
namespace GradedObject
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
@[simps!]
instance categoryOfGradedObjects (β : Type w) : Category.{max w v} (GradedObject β C) :=
CategoryTheory.pi fun _ => C
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {β : Type*} {X Y : GradedObject β C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := by
funext
apply h
/-- The projection of a graded object to its `i`-th component. -/
@[simps]
def eval {β : Type w} (b : β) : GradedObject β C ⥤ C where
obj X := X b
map f := f b
section
variable {β : Type*} (X Y : GradedObject β C)
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `GradedObject` -/
@[simps]
def isoMk (e : ∀ i, X i ≅ Y i) : X ≅ Y where
hom i := (e i).hom
inv i := (e i).inv
variable {X Y}
-- this lemma is not an instance as it may create a loop with `isIso_apply_of_isIso`
lemma isIso_of_isIso_apply (f : X ⟶ Y) [hf : ∀ i, IsIso (f i)] :
IsIso f := by
change IsIso (isoMk X Y (fun i => asIso (f i))).hom
infer_instance
instance isIso_apply_of_isIso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (i : β) : IsIso (f i) := by
change IsIso ((eval i).map f)
infer_instance
end
end GradedObject
namespace Iso
variable {C D E J : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Category E]
{X Y : GradedObject J C}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma hom_inv_id_eval (e : X ≅ Y) (j : J) :
e.hom j ≫ e.inv j = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_comp, e.hom_inv_id,
GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_hom_id_eval (e : X ≅ Y) (j : J) :
e.inv j ≫ e.hom j = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_comp, e.inv_hom_id,
GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_hom_inv_id_eval (e : X ≅ Y) (F : C ⥤ D) (j : J) :
F.map (e.hom j) ≫ F.map (e.inv j) = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← F.map_comp, ← GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_comp, e.hom_inv_id,
GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_id, Functor.map_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_inv_hom_id_eval (e : X ≅ Y) (F : C ⥤ D) (j : J) :
F.map (e.inv j) ≫ F.map (e.hom j) = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← F.map_comp, ← GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_comp, e.inv_hom_id,
GradedObject.categoryOfGradedObjects_id, Functor.map_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_hom_inv_id_eval_app (e : X ≅ Y) (F : C ⥤ D ⥤ E) (j : J) (Y : D) :
(F.map (e.hom j)).app Y ≫ (F.map (e.inv j)).app Y = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← NatTrans.comp_app, ← F.map_comp, hom_inv_id_eval,
Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_inv_hom_id_eval_app (e : X ≅ Y) (F : C ⥤ D ⥤ E) (j : J) (Y : D) :
(F.map (e.inv j)).app Y ≫ (F.map (e.hom j)).app Y = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← NatTrans.comp_app, ← F.map_comp, inv_hom_id_eval,
Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app]
end Iso
namespace GradedObject
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable (C)
/-- Pull back an `I`-graded object in `C` to a `J`-graded object along a function `J → I`. -/
abbrev comap {I J : Type*} (h : J → I) : GradedObject I C ⥤ GradedObject J C :=
Pi.comap (fun _ => C) h
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_proj {I : Type*} {x x' : GradedObject I C} (h : x = x') (i : I) :
(eqToHom h : x ⟶ x') i = eqToHom (funext_iff.mp h i) := by
subst h
rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism comparing between
pulling back along two propositionally equal functions.
-/
@[simps]
def comapEq {β γ : Type w} {f g : β → γ} (h : f = g) : comap C f ≅ comap C g where
hom := { app := fun X b => eqToHom (by dsimp; simp only [h]) }
inv := { app := fun X b => eqToHom (by dsimp; simp only [h]) }
theorem comapEq_symm {β γ : Type w} {f g : β → γ} (h : f = g) :
comapEq C h.symm = (comapEq C h).symm := by aesop_cat
theorem comapEq_trans {β γ : Type w} {f g h : β → γ} (k : f = g) (l : g = h) :
comapEq C (k.trans l) = comapEq C k ≪≫ comapEq C l := by aesop_cat
theorem eqToHom_apply {β : Type w} {X Y : β → C} (h : X = Y) (b : β) :
(eqToHom h : X ⟶ Y) b = eqToHom (by rw [h]) := by
subst h
rfl
/-- The equivalence between β-graded objects and γ-graded objects,
given an equivalence between β and γ.
-/
@[simps]
def comapEquiv {β γ : Type w} (e : β ≃ γ) : GradedObject β C ≌ GradedObject γ C where
functor := comap C (e.symm : γ → β)
inverse := comap C (e : β → γ)
counitIso :=
(Pi.comapComp (fun _ => C) _ _).trans (comapEq C (by ext; simp))
unitIso :=
(comapEq C (by ext; simp)).trans (Pi.comapComp _ _ _).symm
end
instance hasShift {β : Type*} [AddCommGroup β] (s : β) : HasShift (GradedObjectWithShift s C) ℤ :=
hasShiftMk _ _
{ F := fun n => comap C fun b : β => b + n • s
zero := comapEq C (by aesop_cat) ≪≫ Pi.comapId β fun _ => C
add := fun m n => comapEq C (by ext; dsimp; rw [add_comm m n, add_zsmul, add_assoc]) ≪≫
(Pi.comapComp _ _ _).symm }
@[simp]
theorem shiftFunctor_obj_apply {β : Type*} [AddCommGroup β] (s : β) (X : β → C) (t : β) (n : ℤ) :
(shiftFunctor (GradedObjectWithShift s C) n).obj X t = X (t + n • s) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem shiftFunctor_map_apply {β : Type*} [AddCommGroup β] (s : β)
{X Y : GradedObjectWithShift s C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (t : β) (n : ℤ) :
(shiftFunctor (GradedObjectWithShift s C) n).map f t = f (t + n • s) :=
rfl
instance [HasZeroMorphisms C] (β : Type w) (X Y : GradedObject β C) :
Zero (X ⟶ Y) := ⟨fun _ => 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply [HasZeroMorphisms C] (β : Type w) (X Y : GradedObject β C) (b : β) :
(0 : X ⟶ Y) b = 0 :=
rfl
instance hasZeroMorphisms [HasZeroMorphisms C] (β : Type w) :
HasZeroMorphisms.{max w v} (GradedObject β C) where
section
open ZeroObject
instance hasZeroObject [HasZeroObject C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (β : Type w) :
HasZeroObject.{max w v} (GradedObject β C) := by
refine ⟨⟨fun _ => 0, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨fun b => 0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X =>
⟨⟨⟨fun b => 0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩⟩ <;> aesop_cat
end
end GradedObject
namespace GradedObject
-- The universes get a little hairy here, so we restrict the universe level for the grading to 0.
-- Since we're typically interested in grading by ℤ or a finite group, this should be okay.
-- If you're grading by things in higher universes, have fun!
variable (β : Type)
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasCoproducts.{0} C]
section
/-- The total object of a graded object is the coproduct of the graded components.
-/
noncomputable def total : GradedObject β C ⥤ C where
obj X := ∐ fun i : β => X i
map f := Limits.Sigma.map fun i => f i
end
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/--
The `total` functor taking a graded object to the coproduct of its graded components is faithful.
To prove this, we need to know that the coprojections into the coproduct are monomorphisms,
which follows from the fact we have zero morphisms and decidable equality for the grading.
-/
instance : (total β C).Faithful where
map_injective {X Y} f g w := by
ext i
replace w := Sigma.ι (fun i : β => X i) i ≫= w
erw [colimit.ι_map, colimit.ι_map] at w
simp? at * says simp only [Discrete.functor_obj_eq_as, Discrete.natTrans_app] at *
exact Mono.right_cancellation _ _ w
end GradedObject
namespace GradedObject
noncomputable section
variable (β : Type)
variable (C : Type (u + 1)) [LargeCategory C] [HasForget C] [HasCoproducts.{0} C]
[HasZeroMorphisms C]
instance : HasForget (GradedObject β C) where forget := total β C ⋙ forget C
instance : HasForget₂ (GradedObject β C) C where forget₂ := total β C
end
end GradedObject
namespace GradedObject
variable {I J K : Type*} {C : Type*} [Category C]
(X Y Z : GradedObject I C) (φ : X ⟶ Y) (e : X ≅ Y) (ψ : Y ⟶ Z) (p : I → J)
/-- If `X : GradedObject I C` and `p : I → J`, `X.mapObjFun p j` is the family of objects `X i`
for `i : I` such that `p i = j`. -/
abbrev mapObjFun (j : J) (i : p ⁻¹' {j}) : C := X i
variable (j : J)
/-- Given `X : GradedObject I C` and `p : I → J`, `X.HasMap p` is the condition that
for all `j : J`, the coproduct of all `X i` such `p i = j` exists. -/
abbrev HasMap : Prop := ∀ (j : J), HasCoproduct (X.mapObjFun p j)
variable {X Y} in
lemma hasMap_of_iso (e : X ≅ Y) (p: I → J) [HasMap X p] : HasMap Y p := fun j => by
have α : Discrete.functor (X.mapObjFun p j) ≅ Discrete.functor (Y.mapObjFun p j) :=
Discrete.natIso (fun ⟨i, _⟩ => (GradedObject.eval i).mapIso e)
exact hasColimit_of_iso α.symm
section
variable [X.HasMap p] [Y.HasMap p]
/-- Given `X : GradedObject I C` and `p : I → J`, `X.mapObj p` is the graded object by `J`
which in degree `j` consists of the coproduct of the `X i` such that `p i = j`. -/
noncomputable def mapObj : GradedObject J C := fun j => ∐ (X.mapObjFun p j)
/-- The canonical inclusion `X i ⟶ X.mapObj p j` when `i : I` and `j : J` are such
that `p i = j`. -/
noncomputable def ιMapObj (i : I) (j : J) (hij : p i = j) : X i ⟶ X.mapObj p j :=
Sigma.ι (X.mapObjFun p j) ⟨i, hij⟩
/-- Given `X : GradedObject I C`, `p : I → J` and `j : J`,
`CofanMapObjFun X p j` is the type `Cofan (X.mapObjFun p j)`. The point object of
such colimits cofans are isomorphic to `X.mapObj p j`, see `CofanMapObjFun.iso`. -/
abbrev CofanMapObjFun (j : J) : Type _ := Cofan (X.mapObjFun p j)
-- in order to use the cofan API, some definitions below
-- have a `simp` attribute rather than `simps`
/-- Constructor for `CofanMapObjFun X p j`. -/
@[simp]
def CofanMapObjFun.mk (j : J) (pt : C) (ι' : ∀ (i : I) (_ : p i = j), X i ⟶ pt) :
CofanMapObjFun X p j :=
Cofan.mk pt (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ι' i hi)
/-- The tautological cofan corresponding to the coproduct decomposition of `X.mapObj p j`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def cofanMapObj (j : J) : CofanMapObjFun X p j :=
CofanMapObjFun.mk X p j (X.mapObj p j) (fun i hi => X.ιMapObj p i j hi)
/-- Given `X : GradedObject I C`, `p : I → J` and `j : J`, `X.mapObj p j` satisfies
the universal property of the coproduct of those `X i` such that `p i = j`. -/
noncomputable def isColimitCofanMapObj (j : J) : IsColimit (X.cofanMapObj p j) :=
colimit.isColimit _
@[ext]
lemma mapObj_ext {A : C} {j : J} (f g : X.mapObj p j ⟶ A)
(hfg : ∀ (i : I) (hij : p i = j), X.ιMapObj p i j hij ≫ f = X.ιMapObj p i j hij ≫ g) :
f = g :=
Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (X.isColimitCofanMapObj p j) _ _ (fun ⟨i, hij⟩ => hfg i hij)
/-- This is the morphism `X.mapObj p j ⟶ A` constructed from a family of
morphisms `X i ⟶ A` for all `i : I` such that `p i = j`. -/
noncomputable def descMapObj {A : C} {j : J} (φ : ∀ (i : I) (_ : p i = j), X i ⟶ A) :
X.mapObj p j ⟶ A :=
Cofan.IsColimit.desc (X.isColimitCofanMapObj p j) (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => φ i hi)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_descMapObj {A : C} {j : J}
(φ : ∀ (i : I) (_ : p i = j), X i ⟶ A) (i : I) (hi : p i = j) :
X.ιMapObj p i j hi ≫ X.descMapObj p φ = φ i hi := by
apply Cofan.IsColimit.fac
end
namespace CofanMapObjFun
lemma hasMap (c : ∀ j, CofanMapObjFun X p j) (hc : ∀ j, IsColimit (c j)) :
X.HasMap p := fun j => ⟨_, hc j⟩
variable {j X p}
variable [X.HasMap p]
variable {c : CofanMapObjFun X p j} (hc : IsColimit c)
/-- If `c : CofanMapObjFun X p j` is a colimit cofan, this is the induced
isomorphism `c.pt ≅ X.mapObj p j`. -/
noncomputable def iso : c.pt ≅ X.mapObj p j :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc (X.isColimitCofanMapObj p j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inj_iso_hom (i : I) (hi : p i = j) :
c.inj ⟨i, hi⟩ ≫ (c.iso hc).hom = X.ιMapObj p i j hi := by
apply IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ιMapObj_iso_inv (i : I) (hi : p i = j) :
X.ιMapObj p i j hi ≫ (c.iso hc).inv = c.inj ⟨i, hi⟩ := by
apply IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv
end CofanMapObjFun
variable {X Y}
variable [X.HasMap p] [Y.HasMap p]
/-- The canonical morphism of `J`-graded objects `X.mapObj p ⟶ Y.mapObj p` induced by
a morphism `X ⟶ Y` of `I`-graded objects and a map `p : I → J`. -/
noncomputable def mapMap : X.mapObj p ⟶ Y.mapObj p := fun j =>
X.descMapObj p (fun i hi => φ i ≫ Y.ιMapObj p i j hi)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_mapMap (i : I) (j : J) (hij : p i = j) :
X.ιMapObj p i j hij ≫ mapMap φ p j = φ i ≫ Y.ιMapObj p i j hij := by
simp only [mapMap, ι_descMapObj]
lemma congr_mapMap (φ₁ φ₂ : X ⟶ Y) (h : φ₁ = φ₂) : mapMap φ₁ p = mapMap φ₂ p := by
subst h
rfl
variable (X)
@[simp]
lemma mapMap_id : mapMap (𝟙 X) p = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
variable {X Z}
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma mapMap_comp [Z.HasMap p] : mapMap (φ ≫ ψ) p = mapMap φ p ≫ mapMap ψ p := by aesop_cat
/-- The isomorphism of `J`-graded objects `X.mapObj p ≅ Y.mapObj p` induced by an
isomorphism `X ≅ Y` of graded objects and a map `p : I → J`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def mapIso : X.mapObj p ≅ Y.mapObj p where
| hom := mapMap e.hom p
inv := mapMap e.inv p
variable (C)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GradedObject.lean | 421 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning and Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Solvable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PolynomialGaloisGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
/-!
# The Abel-Ruffini Theorem
This file proves one direction of the Abel-Ruffini theorem, namely that if an element is solvable
by radicals, then its minimal polynomial has solvable Galois group.
## Main definitions
* `solvableByRad F E` : the intermediate field of solvable-by-radicals elements
## Main results
* the Abel-Ruffini Theorem `solvableByRad.isSolvable'` : An irreducible polynomial with a root
that is solvable by radicals has a solvable Galois group.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial IntermediateField
section AbelRuffini
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
theorem gal_zero_isSolvable : IsSolvable (0 : F[X]).Gal := by infer_instance
theorem gal_one_isSolvable : IsSolvable (1 : F[X]).Gal := by infer_instance
theorem gal_C_isSolvable (x : F) : IsSolvable (C x).Gal := by infer_instance
theorem gal_X_isSolvable : IsSolvable (X : F[X]).Gal := by infer_instance
theorem gal_X_sub_C_isSolvable (x : F) : IsSolvable (X - C x).Gal := by infer_instance
theorem gal_X_pow_isSolvable (n : ℕ) : IsSolvable (X ^ n : F[X]).Gal := by infer_instance
theorem gal_mul_isSolvable {p q : F[X]} (_ : IsSolvable p.Gal) (_ : IsSolvable q.Gal) :
IsSolvable (p * q).Gal :=
solvable_of_solvable_injective (Gal.restrictProd_injective p q)
theorem gal_prod_isSolvable {s : Multiset F[X]} (hs : ∀ p ∈ s, IsSolvable (Gal p)) :
IsSolvable s.prod.Gal := by
apply Multiset.induction_on' s
· exact gal_one_isSolvable
· intro p t hps _ ht
rw [Multiset.insert_eq_cons, Multiset.prod_cons]
exact gal_mul_isSolvable (hs p hps) ht
theorem gal_isSolvable_of_splits {p q : F[X]}
(_ : Fact (p.Splits (algebraMap F q.SplittingField))) (hq : IsSolvable q.Gal) :
IsSolvable p.Gal :=
haveI : IsSolvable (q.SplittingField ≃ₐ[F] q.SplittingField) := hq
solvable_of_surjective (AlgEquiv.restrictNormalHom_surjective q.SplittingField)
theorem gal_isSolvable_tower (p q : F[X]) (hpq : p.Splits (algebraMap F q.SplittingField))
(hp : IsSolvable p.Gal) (hq : IsSolvable (q.map (algebraMap F p.SplittingField)).Gal) :
IsSolvable q.Gal := by
let K := p.SplittingField
let L := q.SplittingField
haveI : Fact (p.Splits (algebraMap F L)) := ⟨hpq⟩
let ϕ : (L ≃ₐ[K] L) ≃* (q.map (algebraMap F K)).Gal :=
(IsSplittingField.algEquiv L (q.map (algebraMap F K))).autCongr
have ϕ_inj : Function.Injective ϕ.toMonoidHom := ϕ.injective
haveI : IsSolvable (K ≃ₐ[F] K) := hp
haveI : IsSolvable (L ≃ₐ[K] L) := solvable_of_solvable_injective ϕ_inj
exact isSolvable_of_isScalarTower F p.SplittingField q.SplittingField
section GalXPowSubC
theorem gal_X_pow_sub_one_isSolvable (n : ℕ) : IsSolvable (X ^ n - 1 : F[X]).Gal := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, pow_zero, sub_self]
exact gal_zero_isSolvable
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn
have hn'' : (X ^ n - 1 : F[X]) ≠ 0 := X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn' 1
apply isSolvable_of_comm
intro σ τ
ext a ha
simp only [mem_rootSet_of_ne hn'', map_sub, aeval_X_pow, aeval_one, sub_eq_zero] at ha
have key : ∀ σ : (X ^ n - 1 : F[X]).Gal, ∃ m : ℕ, σ a = a ^ m := by
intro σ
lift n to ℕ+ using hn'
exact map_rootsOfUnity_eq_pow_self σ.toAlgHom (rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq a ha)
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := key σ
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := key τ
rw [σ.mul_apply, τ.mul_apply, hc, map_pow, hd, map_pow, hc, ← pow_mul, pow_mul']
theorem gal_X_pow_sub_C_isSolvable_aux (n : ℕ) (a : F)
| (h : (X ^ n - 1 : F[X]).Splits (RingHom.id F)) : IsSolvable (X ^ n - C a).Gal := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha, C_0, sub_zero]
exact gal_X_pow_isSolvable n
have ha' : algebraMap F (X ^ n - C a).SplittingField a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (RingHom.injective _) a) ha
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← C_sub]
exact gal_C_isSolvable (1 - a)
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn
have hn'' : X ^ n - C a ≠ 0 := X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn' a
have hn''' : (X ^ n - 1 : F[X]) ≠ 0 := X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn' 1
have mem_range : ∀ {c : (X ^ n - C a).SplittingField},
(c ^ n = 1 → (∃ d, algebraMap F (X ^ n - C a).SplittingField d = c)) := fun {c} hc =>
RingHom.mem_range.mp (minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one F c (h.def.resolve_left hn'''
(minpoly.irreducible ((SplittingField.instNormal (X ^ n - C a)).isIntegral c))
(minpoly.dvd F c (by rwa [map_id, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, aeval_X_pow, aeval_one]))))
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/AbelRuffini.lean | 98 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sean Leather. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.AList
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Finite maps over `Multiset`
-/
universe u v w
open List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### Multisets of sigma types -/
namespace Multiset
/-- Multiset of keys of an association multiset. -/
def keys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Multiset α :=
s.map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem coe_keys {l : List (Sigma β)} : keys (l : Multiset (Sigma β)) = (l.keys : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_zero : keys (0 : Multiset (Sigma β)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Multiset (Sigma β)} :
keys (⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ keys s := by
simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton {a : α} {b : β a} : keys ({⟨a, b⟩} : Multiset (Sigma β)) = {a} := rfl
/-- `NodupKeys s` means that `s` has no duplicate keys. -/
def NodupKeys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.NodupKeys fun _ _ p => propext <| perm_nodupKeys p
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodupKeys {l : List (Sigma β)} : @NodupKeys α β l ↔ l.NodupKeys :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nodup_keys {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} : m.keys.Nodup ↔ m.NodupKeys := by
rcases m with ⟨l⟩; rfl
alias ⟨_, NodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩ := nodup_keys
protected lemma NodupKeys.nodup {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} (h : m.NodupKeys) : m.Nodup :=
h.nodup_keys.of_map _
end Multiset
/-! ### Finmap -/
/-- `Finmap β` is the type of finite maps over a multiset. It is effectively
a quotient of `AList β` by permutation of the underlying list. -/
structure Finmap (β : α → Type v) : Type max u v where
/-- The underlying `Multiset` of a `Finmap` -/
entries : Multiset (Sigma β)
/-- There are no duplicate keys in `entries` -/
nodupKeys : entries.NodupKeys
/-- The quotient map from `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def AList.toFinmap (s : AList β) : Finmap β :=
⟨s.entries, s.nodupKeys⟩
local notation:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => AList.toFinmap a
theorem AList.toFinmap_eq {s₁ s₂ : AList β} :
toFinmap s₁ = toFinmap s₂ ↔ s₁.entries ~ s₂.entries := by
cases s₁
cases s₂
simp [AList.toFinmap]
@[simp]
theorem AList.toFinmap_entries (s : AList β) : ⟦s⟧.entries = s.entries :=
rfl
/-- Given `l : List (Sigma β)`, create a term of type `Finmap β` by removing
entries with duplicate keys. -/
def List.toFinmap [DecidableEq α] (s : List (Sigma β)) : Finmap β :=
s.toAList.toFinmap
namespace Finmap
open AList
lemma nodup_entries (f : Finmap β) : f.entries.Nodup := f.nodupKeys.nodup
/-! ### Lifting from AList -/
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def liftOn {γ} (s : Finmap β) (f : AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a b : AList β, a.entries ~ b.entries → f a = f b) : γ := by
refine
(Quotient.liftOn s.entries
(fun (l : List (Sigma β)) => (⟨_, fun nd => f ⟨l, nd⟩⟩ : Part γ))
(fun l₁ l₂ p => Part.ext' (perm_nodupKeys p) ?_) : Part γ).get ?_
· exact fun h1 h2 => H _ _ p
· have := s.nodupKeys
revert this
rcases s.entries with ⟨l⟩
exact id
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_toFinmap {γ} (s : AList β) (f : AList β → γ) (H) : liftOn ⟦s⟧ f H = f s := by
cases s
rfl
| /-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on 2 `AList`s to 2 `Finmap`s. -/
def liftOn₂ {γ} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : AList β,
| Mathlib/Data/Finmap.lean | 118 | 120 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Devon Tuma, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Opposite
/-!
# Non-zero divisors and smul-divisors
In this file we define the submonoid `nonZeroDivisors` and `nonZeroSMulDivisors` of a
`MonoidWithZero`. We also define `nonZeroDivisorsLeft` and `nonZeroDivisorsRight` for
non-commutative monoids.
## Notations
This file declares the notations:
- `M₀⁰` for the submonoid of non-zero-divisors of `M₀`, in the locale `nonZeroDivisors`.
- `M₀⁰[M]` for the submonoid of non-zero smul-divisors of `M₀` with respect to `M`, in the locale
`nonZeroSMulDivisors`
Use the statement `open scoped nonZeroDivisors nonZeroSMulDivisors` to access this notation in
your own code.
-/
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
section
variable (M₀ : Type*) [MonoidWithZero M₀] {x : M₀}
/-- The collection of elements of a `MonoidWithZero` that are not left zero divisors form a
`Submonoid`. -/
def nonZeroDivisorsLeft : Submonoid M₀ where
carrier := {x | ∀ y, y * x = 0 → y = 0}
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {x} {y} hx hy := fun z hz ↦ hx _ <| hy _ (mul_assoc z x y ▸ hz)
@[simp]
lemma mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff : x ∈ nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ ↔ ∀ y, y * x = 0 → y = 0 := .rfl
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff :
x ∉ nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ ↔ {y | y * x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
simpa [mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff] using Set.nonempty_def.symm
/-- The collection of elements of a `MonoidWithZero` that are not right zero divisors form a
`Submonoid`. -/
def nonZeroDivisorsRight : Submonoid M₀ where
carrier := {x | ∀ y, x * y = 0 → y = 0}
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' := fun {x} {y} hx hy z hz ↦ hy _ (hx _ ((mul_assoc x y z).symm ▸ hz))
@[simp]
lemma mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff : x ∈ nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ ↔ ∀ y, x * y = 0 → y = 0 := .rfl
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff :
x ∉ nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ ↔ {y | x * y = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
simpa [mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff] using Set.nonempty_def.symm
lemma nonZeroDivisorsLeft_eq_right (M₀ : Type*) [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] :
nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ = nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ := by
ext x; simp [mul_comm x]
@[simp] lemma coe_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_eq [NoZeroDivisors M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] :
nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ = {x : M₀ | x ≠ 0} := by
ext x
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff, mul_eq_zero, forall_eq_or_imp, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hx y hx' ↦ by contradiction⟩
contrapose! h
exact ⟨1, h, one_ne_zero⟩
|
@[simp] lemma coe_nonZeroDivisorsRight_eq [NoZeroDivisors M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] :
nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ = {x : M₀ | x ≠ 0} := by
ext x
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff, mul_eq_zero, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hx y hx' ↦ by aesop⟩
contrapose! h
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/NonZeroDivisors.lean | 77 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
/-!
# Scalar-multiple polynomial evaluation
This file defines polynomial evaluation via scalar multiplication. Our polynomials have
coefficients in a semiring `R`, and we evaluate at a weak form of `R`-algebra, namely an additive
commutative monoid with an action of `R` and a notion of natural number power. This
is a generalization of `Algebra.Polynomial.Eval`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.smeval`: function for evaluating a polynomial with coefficients in a `Semiring`
`R` at an element `x` of an `AddCommMonoid` `S` that has natural number powers and an `R`-action.
* `smeval.linearMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-linear map, when `S` is an `R`-module.
* `smeval.algebraMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-algebra map, when `S` is an `R`-algebra.
## Main results
* `smeval_monomial`: monomials evaluate as we expect.
* `smeval_add`, `smeval_smul`: linearity of evaluation, given an `R`-module.
* `smeval_mul`, `smeval_comp`: multiplicativity of evaluation, given power-associativity.
* `eval₂_smulOneHom_eq_smeval`, `leval_eq_smeval.linearMap`,
`aeval_eq_smeval`, etc.: comparisons
## TODO
* `smeval_neg` and `smeval_intCast` for `R` a ring and `S` an `AddCommGroup`.
* Nonunital evaluation for polynomials with vanishing constant term for `Pow S ℕ+` (different file?)
-/
namespace Polynomial
section MulActionWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (p : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ]
[MulActionWithZero R S] (x : S)
/-- Scalar multiplication together with taking a natural number power. -/
def smul_pow : ℕ → R → S := fun n r => r • x^n
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` in the scalar semiring `R` at an element `x` in the target `S` using
scalar multiple `R`-action. -/
irreducible_def smeval : S := p.sum (smul_pow x)
theorem smeval_eq_sum : p.smeval x = p.sum (smul_pow x) := by rw [smeval_def]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_C : (C r).smeval x = r • x ^ 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_C_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_monomial (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n r).smeval x = r • x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index]
theorem eval_eq_smeval : p.eval r = p.smeval r := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, smeval_eq_sum]
rfl
theorem eval₂_smulOneHom_eq_smeval (R : Type*) [Semiring R] {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (p : R[X]) (x : S) :
p.eval₂ RingHom.smulOneHom x = p.smeval x := by
rw [smeval_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum]
congr 1 with e a
simp only [RingHom.smulOneHom_apply, smul_one_mul, smul_pow]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem smeval_zero : (0 : R[X]).smeval x = 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, sum_zero_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_one : (1 : R[X]).smeval x = 1 • x ^ 0 := by
rw [← C_1, smeval_C]
simp only [Nat.cast_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_X :
(X : R[X]).smeval x = x ^ 1 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_X_index, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_X_pow {n : ℕ} :
(X ^ n : R[X]).smeval x = x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, X_pow_eq_monomial, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index, one_smul]
end MulActionWithZero
section Module
variable (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (p q : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ] [Module R S]
(x : S)
@[simp]
theorem smeval_add : (p + q).smeval x = p.smeval x + q.smeval x := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow]
refine sum_add_index p q (smul_pow x) (fun _ ↦ ?_) (fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_)
· rw [smul_pow, zero_smul]
· rw [smul_pow, smul_pow, smul_pow, add_smul]
theorem smeval_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).smeval x = n • x ^ 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [smeval_zero, Nat.cast_zero, zero_smul]
| succ n ih => rw [n.cast_succ, smeval_add, ih, smeval_one, ← add_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_smul (r : R) : (r • p).smeval x = r • p.smeval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => rw [smul_add, smeval_add, ph, qh, ← smul_add, smeval_add]
| monomial n a => rw [smul_monomial, smeval_monomial, smeval_monomial, smul_assoc]
/-- `Polynomial.smeval` as a linear map. -/
def smeval.linearMap : R[X] →ₗ[R] S where
toFun f := f.smeval x
map_add' f g := by simp only [smeval_add]
map_smul' c f := by simp only [smeval_smul, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem smeval.linearMap_apply : smeval.linearMap R x p = p.smeval x := rfl
theorem leval_coe_eq_smeval {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) :
⇑(leval r) = fun p => p.smeval r := by
rw [funext_iff]
intro
rw [leval_apply, smeval_def, eval_eq_sum]
rfl
theorem leval_eq_smeval.linearMap {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) :
leval r = smeval.linearMap R r := by
refine LinearMap.ext ?_
intro
rw [leval_apply, smeval.linearMap_apply, eval_eq_smeval]
end Module
section Neg
variable (R : Type*) [Ring R] {S : Type*} [AddCommGroup S] [Pow S ℕ] [Module R S] (p q : R[X])
(x : S)
@[simp]
theorem smeval_neg : (-p).smeval x = - p.smeval x := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← smeval_add, neg_add_cancel, smeval_zero]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_sub : (p - q).smeval x = p.smeval x - q.smeval x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, smeval_add, smeval_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem smeval_neg_nat (S : Type*) [NonAssocRing S] [Pow S ℕ] [NatPowAssoc S] (q : ℕ[X])
(n : ℕ) : q.smeval (-(n : S)) = q.smeval (-n : ℤ) := by
rw [smeval_eq_sum, smeval_eq_sum]
simp only [Polynomial.smul_pow, sum_def, Int.cast_sum, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_npow]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl ?_
intro k _
rw [show -(n : S) = (-n : ℤ) by simp only [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast], nsmul_eq_mul,
← AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_npow, ← Int.cast_mul, ← nsmul_eq_mul]
end Neg
section NatPowAssoc
/-!
In the module docstring for algebras at `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic`, we see that
`[CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S] [IsScalarTower R S S] [SMulCommClass R S S]` is an
equivalent way to express `[CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]` that allows one to relax
the defining structures independently. For non-associative power-associative algebras (e.g.,
octonions), we replace the `[Semiring S]` with `[NonAssocSemiring S] [Pow S ℕ] [NatPowAssoc S]`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (r : R) (p q : R[X]) {S : Type*}
[NonAssocSemiring S] [Module R S] [Pow S ℕ] (x : S)
theorem smeval_C_mul : (C r * p).smeval x = r • p.smeval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => simp only [mul_add, smeval_add, ph, qh, smul_add]
| monomial n b => simp only [C_mul_monomial, smeval_monomial, mul_smul]
variable [NatPowAssoc S]
theorem smeval_at_natCast (q : ℕ[X]) : ∀(n : ℕ), q.smeval (n : S) = q.smeval n := by
induction q using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh =>
intro n
simp only [add_mul, smeval_add, ph, qh, Nat.cast_add]
| monomial n a =>
intro n
rw [smeval_monomial, smeval_monomial, nsmul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_npow]
theorem smeval_at_zero : p.smeval (0 : S) = (p.coeff 0) • (1 : S) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => simp_all only [smeval_add, coeff_add, add_smul]
| monomial n a =>
cases n with
| zero => simp only [monomial_zero_left, smeval_C, npow_zero, coeff_C_zero]
| succ n => rw [coeff_monomial_succ, smeval_monomial, npow_add, npow_one, mul_zero, zero_smul,
smul_zero]
section
variable [SMulCommClass R S S]
theorem smeval_X_mul : (X * p).smeval x = x * p.smeval x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => simp only [smeval_add, ph, qh, mul_add]
| monomial n a =>
rw [← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, smeval_monomial, one_mul, npow_add,
npow_one, ← mul_smul_comm, smeval_monomial]
theorem smeval_X_pow_assoc (m n : ℕ) :
x ^ m * x ^ n * p.smeval x = x ^ m * (x ^ n * p.smeval x) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => simp only [smeval_add, ph, qh, mul_add]
| monomial n a => simp only [smeval_monomial, mul_smul_comm, npow_mul_assoc]
theorem smeval_X_pow_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ), (X^n * p).smeval x = x^n * p.smeval x
| 0 => by
simp [npow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by
rw [add_comm, npow_add, mul_assoc, npow_one, smeval_X_mul, smeval_X_pow_mul n, npow_add,
smeval_X_pow_assoc, npow_one]
theorem smeval_monomial_mul (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n r * p).smeval x = r • (x ^ n * p.smeval x) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add r s hr hs =>
simp only [add_comp, hr, hs, smeval_add, add_mul]
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, mul_assoc, smeval_C_mul, smeval_X_pow_mul, smeval_add]
| monomial n a =>
rw [smeval_monomial, monomial_mul_monomial, smeval_monomial, npow_add, mul_smul, mul_smul_comm]
end
variable [IsScalarTower R S S]
theorem smeval_mul_X : (p * X).smeval x = p.smeval x * x := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => simp only [add_mul, smeval_add, ph, qh]
| monomial n a =>
simp only [← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, smeval_monomial, mul_one, pow_succ',
mul_assoc, npow_add, smul_mul_assoc, npow_one]
theorem smeval_assoc_X_pow (m n : ℕ) :
p.smeval x * x ^ m * x ^ n = p.smeval x * (x ^ m * x ^ n) := by
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q ph qh => simp only [smeval_add, ph, qh, add_mul]
| | monomial n a =>
rw [smeval_monomial, smul_mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc, npow_mul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc]
theorem smeval_mul_X_pow : ∀ (n : ℕ), (p * X^n).smeval x = p.smeval x * x^n
| 0 => by
simp only [npow_zero, mul_one]
| n + 1 => by
rw [npow_add, ← mul_assoc, npow_one, smeval_mul_X, smeval_mul_X_pow n, npow_add,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Smeval.lean | 255 | 262 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Jensen
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.SpecificFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
import Mathlib.Data.Real.ConjExponents
/-!
# Mean value inequalities
In this file we prove several inequalities for finite sums, including AM-GM inequality,
HM-GM inequality, Young's inequality, Hölder inequality, and Minkowski inequality. Versions for
integrals of some of these inequalities are available in
`Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.MeanInequalities`.
## Main theorems
### AM-GM inequality:
The inequality says that the geometric mean of a tuple of non-negative numbers is less than or equal
to their arithmetic mean. We prove the weighted version of this inequality: if $w$ and $z$
are two non-negative vectors and $\sum_{i\in s} w_i=1$, then
$$
\prod_{i\in s} z_i^{w_i} ≤ \sum_{i\in s} w_iz_i.
$$
The classical version is a special case of this inequality for $w_i=\frac{1}{n}$.
We prove a few versions of this inequality. Each of the following lemmas comes in two versions:
a version for real-valued non-negative functions is in the `Real` namespace, and a version for
`NNReal`-valued functions is in the `NNReal` namespace.
- `geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted` : weighted version for functions on `Finset`s;
- `geom_mean_le_arith_mean2_weighted` : weighted version for two numbers;
- `geom_mean_le_arith_mean3_weighted` : weighted version for three numbers;
- `geom_mean_le_arith_mean4_weighted` : weighted version for four numbers.
### HM-GM inequality:
The inequality says that the harmonic mean of a tuple of positive numbers is less than or equal
to their geometric mean. We prove the weighted version of this inequality: if $w$ and $z$
are two positive vectors and $\sum_{i\in s} w_i=1$, then
$$
1/(\sum_{i\in s} w_i/z_i) ≤ \prod_{i\in s} z_i^{w_i}
$$
The classical version is proven as a special case of this inequality for $w_i=\frac{1}{n}$.
The inequalities are proven only for real valued positive functions on `Finset`s, and namespaced in
`Real`. The weighted version follows as a corollary of the weighted AM-GM inequality.
### Young's inequality
Young's inequality says that for non-negative numbers `a`, `b`, `p`, `q` such that
$\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1$ we have
$$
ab ≤ \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}.
$$
This inequality is a special case of the AM-GM inequality. It is then used to prove Hölder's
inequality (see below).
### Hölder's inequality
The inequality says that for two conjugate exponents `p` and `q` (i.e., for two positive numbers
such that $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1$) and any two non-negative vectors their inner product is
less than or equal to the product of the $L_p$ norm of the first vector and the $L_q$ norm of the
second vector:
$$
\sum_{i\in s} a_ib_i ≤ \sqrt[p]{\sum_{i\in s} a_i^p}\sqrt[q]{\sum_{i\in s} b_i^q}.
$$
We give versions of this result in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`.
There are at least two short proofs of this inequality. In our proof we prenormalize both vectors,
then apply Young's inequality to each $a_ib_i$. Another possible proof would be to deduce this
inequality from the generalized mean inequality for well-chosen vectors and weights.
### Minkowski's inequality
The inequality says that for `p ≥ 1` the function
$$
\|a\|_p=\sqrt[p]{\sum_{i\in s} a_i^p}
$$
satisfies the triangle inequality $\|a+b\|_p\le \|a\|_p+\|b\|_p$.
We give versions of this result in `Real`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`.
We deduce this inequality from Hölder's inequality. Namely, Hölder inequality implies that $\|a\|_p$
is the maximum of the inner product $\sum_{i\in s}a_ib_i$ over `b` such that $\|b\|_q\le 1$. Now
Minkowski's inequality follows from the fact that the maximum value of the sum of two functions is
less than or equal to the sum of the maximum values of the summands.
## TODO
- each inequality `A ≤ B` should come with a theorem `A = B ↔ _`; one of the ways to prove them
is to define `StrictConvexOn` functions.
- generalized mean inequality with any `p ≤ q`, including negative numbers;
- prove that the power mean tends to the geometric mean as the exponent tends to zero.
-/
universe u v
open Finset NNReal ENNReal
open scoped BigOperators
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type u} (s : Finset ι)
section GeomMeanLEArithMean
/-! ### AM-GM inequality -/
namespace Real
/-- **AM-GM inequality**: The geometric mean is less than or equal to the arithmetic mean, weighted
version for real-valued nonnegative functions. -/
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted (w z : ι → ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) :
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i := by
-- If some number `z i` equals zero and has non-zero weight, then LHS is 0 and RHS is nonnegative.
by_cases A : ∃ i ∈ s, z i = 0 ∧ w i ≠ 0
· rcases A with ⟨i, his, hzi, hwi⟩
rw [prod_eq_zero his]
· exact sum_nonneg fun j hj => mul_nonneg (hw j hj) (hz j hj)
· rw [hzi]
exact zero_rpow hwi
-- If all numbers `z i` with non-zero weight are positive, then we apply Jensen's inequality
-- for `exp` and numbers `log (z i)` with weights `w i`.
· simp only [not_exists, not_and, Ne, Classical.not_not] at A
have := convexOn_exp.map_sum_le hw hw' fun i _ => Set.mem_univ <| log (z i)
simp only [exp_sum, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm (w _) (log _)] at this
convert this using 1 <;> [apply prod_congr rfl;apply sum_congr rfl] <;> intro i hi
· rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (hz i hi) with hz | hz
· simp [A i hi hz.symm]
· exact rpow_def_of_pos hz _
· rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (hz i hi) with hz | hz
· simp [A i hi hz.symm]
· rw [exp_log hz]
/-- **AM-GM inequality**: The **geometric mean is less than or equal to the arithmetic mean. -/
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → ℝ) (z : ι → ℝ)
(hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw' : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) :
(∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i) ^ (∑ i ∈ s, w i)⁻¹ ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i) / (∑ i ∈ s, w i) := by
convert geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted s (fun i => (w i) / ∑ i ∈ s, w i) z ?_ ?_ hz using 2
· rw [← finset_prod_rpow _ _ (fun i hi => rpow_nonneg (hz _ hi) _) _]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun _ ih => ?_)
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, rpow_mul (hz _ ih)]
· simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← Finset.sum_mul, mul_comm]
· exact fun _ hi => div_nonneg (hw _ hi) (le_of_lt hw')
· simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← Finset.sum_mul]
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ (by linarith)
theorem geom_mean_weighted_of_constant (w z : ι → ℝ) (x : ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) (hx : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → z i = x) :
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i = x :=
calc
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i = ∏ i ∈ s, x ^ w i := by
refine prod_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne (w i) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· rw [h₀, rpow_zero, rpow_zero]
· rw [hx i hi h₀]
_ = x := by
rw [← rpow_sum_of_nonneg _ hw, hw', rpow_one]
have : (∑ i ∈ s, w i) ≠ 0 := by
rw [hw']
exact one_ne_zero
obtain ⟨i, his, hi⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero this
rw [← hx i his hi]
exact hz i his
theorem arith_mean_weighted_of_constant (w z : ι → ℝ) (x : ℝ) (hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(hx : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → z i = x) : ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i = x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i = ∑ i ∈ s, w i * x := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne (w i) 0 with hwi | hwi
· rw [hwi, zero_mul, zero_mul]
· rw [hx i hi hwi]
_ = x := by rw [← sum_mul, hw', one_mul]
theorem geom_mean_eq_arith_mean_weighted_of_constant (w z : ι → ℝ) (x : ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) (hx : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → z i = x) :
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i = ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i := by
rw [geom_mean_weighted_of_constant, arith_mean_weighted_of_constant] <;> assumption
/-- **AM-GM inequality - equality condition**: This theorem provides the equality condition for the
*positive* weighted version of the AM-GM inequality for real-valued nonnegative functions. -/
theorem geom_mean_eq_arith_mean_weighted_iff' (w z : ι → ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) :
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i = ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, z j = ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i := by
by_cases A : ∃ i ∈ s, z i = 0 ∧ w i ≠ 0
· rcases A with ⟨i, his, hzi, hwi⟩
rw [prod_eq_zero his]
· constructor
· intro h
rw [← h]
intro j hj
apply eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_left_eq_zero (ne_of_lt (hw j hj)).symm
apply (sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg ?_).mp h.symm j hj
exact fun i hi => (mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left (hw i hi)).mpr (hz i hi)
· intro h
convert h i his
exact hzi.symm
· rw [hzi]
exact zero_rpow hwi
· simp only [not_exists, not_and] at A
have hz' := fun i h => lt_of_le_of_ne (hz i h) (fun a => (A i h a.symm) (ne_of_gt (hw i h)))
have := strictConvexOn_exp.map_sum_eq_iff hw hw' fun i _ => Set.mem_univ <| log (z i)
simp only [exp_sum, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm (w _) (log _)] at this
convert this using 1
· apply Eq.congr <;>
[apply prod_congr rfl; apply sum_congr rfl] <;>
intro i hi <;>
simp only [exp_mul, exp_log (hz' i hi)]
· constructor <;> intro h j hj
· rw [← arith_mean_weighted_of_constant s w _ (log (z j)) hw' fun i _ => congrFun rfl]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
simp only [mul_comm, h j hj, h x hx]
· rw [← arith_mean_weighted_of_constant s w _ (z j) hw' fun i _ => congrFun rfl]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
simp only [log_injOn_pos (hz' j hj) (hz' x hx), h j hj, h x hx]
/-- **AM-GM inequality - equality condition**: This theorem provides the equality condition for the
weighted version of the AM-GM inequality for real-valued nonnegative functions. -/
theorem geom_mean_eq_arith_mean_weighted_iff (w z : ι → ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) :
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i = ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, w j ≠ 0 → z j = ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i := by
have h (i) (_ : i ∈ s) : w i * z i ≠ 0 → w i ≠ 0 := by apply left_ne_zero_of_mul
have h' (i) (_ : i ∈ s) : z i ^ w i ≠ 1 → w i ≠ 0 := by
by_contra!
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := this
simp only [h2, rpow_zero, ne_self_iff_false] at h1
rw [← sum_filter_of_ne h, ← prod_filter_of_ne h', geom_mean_eq_arith_mean_weighted_iff']
· simp
· simp +contextual [(hw _ _).gt_iff_ne]
· rwa [sum_filter_ne_zero]
· simp_all only [ne_eq, mul_eq_zero, not_or, not_false_eq_true, and_imp, implies_true, mem_filter]
/-- **AM-GM inequality - strict inequality condition**: This theorem provides the strict inequality
condition for the *positive* weighted version of the AM-GM inequality for real-valued nonnegative
functions. -/
theorem geom_mean_lt_arith_mean_weighted_iff_of_pos (w z : ι → ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ z i) :
∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i < ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i ↔ ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ k ∈ s, z j ≠ z k:= by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra! h_contra
rw [(geom_mean_eq_arith_mean_weighted_iff' s w z hw hw' hz).mpr ?_] at h
· exact (lt_self_iff_false _).mp h
· intro j hjs
rw [← arith_mean_weighted_of_constant s w (fun _ => z j) (z j) hw' fun _ _ => congrFun rfl]
apply sum_congr rfl (fun x a => congrArg (HMul.hMul (w x)) (h_contra j hjs x a))
· rintro ⟨j, hjs, k, hks, hzjk⟩
have := geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted s w z (fun i a => le_of_lt (hw i a)) hw' hz
by_contra! h
apply le_antisymm this at h
apply (geom_mean_eq_arith_mean_weighted_iff' s w z hw hw' hz).mp at h
simp only [h j hjs, h k hks, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at hzjk
end Real
namespace NNReal
/-- **AM-GM inequality**: The geometric mean is less than or equal to the arithmetic mean, weighted
version for `NNReal`-valued functions. -/
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted (w z : ι → ℝ≥0) (hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
(∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ (w i : ℝ)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, w i * z i :=
mod_cast
Real.geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted _ _ _ (fun i _ => (w i).coe_nonneg)
(by assumption_mod_cast) fun i _ => (z i).coe_nonneg
/-- **AM-GM inequality**: The geometric mean is less than or equal to the arithmetic mean, weighted
version for two `NNReal` numbers. -/
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean2_weighted (w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂ : ℝ≥0) :
w₁ + w₂ = 1 → p₁ ^ (w₁ : ℝ) * p₂ ^ (w₂ : ℝ) ≤ w₁ * p₁ + w₂ * p₂ := by
simpa only [Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_succ, Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty,
Finset.univ_eq_empty, Fin.cons_succ, Fin.cons_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted univ ![w₁, w₂] ![p₁, p₂]
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean3_weighted (w₁ w₂ w₃ p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℝ≥0) :
w₁ + w₂ + w₃ = 1 →
p₁ ^ (w₁ : ℝ) * p₂ ^ (w₂ : ℝ) * p₃ ^ (w₃ : ℝ) ≤ w₁ * p₁ + w₂ * p₂ + w₃ * p₃ := by
simpa only [Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_succ, Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty,
Finset.univ_eq_empty, Fin.cons_succ, Fin.cons_zero, add_zero, mul_one, ← add_assoc,
mul_assoc] using geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted univ ![w₁, w₂, w₃] ![p₁, p₂, p₃]
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean4_weighted (w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄ p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : ℝ≥0) :
w₁ + w₂ + w₃ + w₄ = 1 →
p₁ ^ (w₁ : ℝ) * p₂ ^ (w₂ : ℝ) * p₃ ^ (w₃ : ℝ) * p₄ ^ (w₄ : ℝ) ≤
w₁ * p₁ + w₂ * p₂ + w₃ * p₃ + w₄ * p₄ := by
simpa only [Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_succ, Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty,
Finset.univ_eq_empty, Fin.cons_succ, Fin.cons_zero, add_zero, mul_one, ← add_assoc,
mul_assoc] using geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted univ ![w₁, w₂, w₃, w₄] ![p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄]
end NNReal
namespace Real
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean2_weighted {w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂ : ℝ} (hw₁ : 0 ≤ w₁) (hw₂ : 0 ≤ w₂)
(hp₁ : 0 ≤ p₁) (hp₂ : 0 ≤ p₂) (hw : w₁ + w₂ = 1) : p₁ ^ w₁ * p₂ ^ w₂ ≤ w₁ * p₁ + w₂ * p₂ :=
NNReal.geom_mean_le_arith_mean2_weighted ⟨w₁, hw₁⟩ ⟨w₂, hw₂⟩ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ ⟨p₂, hp₂⟩ <|
NNReal.coe_inj.1 <| by assumption
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean3_weighted {w₁ w₂ w₃ p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℝ} (hw₁ : 0 ≤ w₁) (hw₂ : 0 ≤ w₂)
(hw₃ : 0 ≤ w₃) (hp₁ : 0 ≤ p₁) (hp₂ : 0 ≤ p₂) (hp₃ : 0 ≤ p₃) (hw : w₁ + w₂ + w₃ = 1) :
p₁ ^ w₁ * p₂ ^ w₂ * p₃ ^ w₃ ≤ w₁ * p₁ + w₂ * p₂ + w₃ * p₃ :=
NNReal.geom_mean_le_arith_mean3_weighted ⟨w₁, hw₁⟩ ⟨w₂, hw₂⟩ ⟨w₃, hw₃⟩ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ ⟨p₂, hp₂⟩
⟨p₃, hp₃⟩ <|
NNReal.coe_inj.1 hw
theorem geom_mean_le_arith_mean4_weighted {w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄ p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : ℝ} (hw₁ : 0 ≤ w₁)
(hw₂ : 0 ≤ w₂) (hw₃ : 0 ≤ w₃) (hw₄ : 0 ≤ w₄) (hp₁ : 0 ≤ p₁) (hp₂ : 0 ≤ p₂) (hp₃ : 0 ≤ p₃)
(hp₄ : 0 ≤ p₄) (hw : w₁ + w₂ + w₃ + w₄ = 1) :
p₁ ^ w₁ * p₂ ^ w₂ * p₃ ^ w₃ * p₄ ^ w₄ ≤ w₁ * p₁ + w₂ * p₂ + w₃ * p₃ + w₄ * p₄ :=
NNReal.geom_mean_le_arith_mean4_weighted ⟨w₁, hw₁⟩ ⟨w₂, hw₂⟩ ⟨w₃, hw₃⟩ ⟨w₄, hw₄⟩ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩
⟨p₂, hp₂⟩ ⟨p₃, hp₃⟩ ⟨p₄, hp₄⟩ <|
NNReal.coe_inj.1 <| by assumption
/-- As an example application of AM-GM we prove that the **Motzkin polynomial** is nonnegative.
This bivariate polynomial cannot be written as a sum of squares. -/
lemma motzkin_polynomial_nonneg (x y : ℝ) :
0 ≤ x ^ 4 * y ^ 2 + x ^ 2 * y ^ 4 - 3 * x ^ 2 * y ^ 2 + 1 := by
have nn₁ : 0 ≤ x ^ 4 * y ^ 2 := by positivity
have nn₂ : 0 ≤ x ^ 2 * y ^ 4 := by positivity
have key := geom_mean_le_arith_mean3_weighted (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
nn₁ nn₂ zero_le_one (add_thirds 1)
rw [one_rpow, mul_one, ← mul_rpow nn₁ nn₂, ← mul_add, ← mul_add,
show x ^ 4 * y ^ 2 * (x ^ 2 * y ^ 4) = (x ^ 2) ^ 3 * (y ^ 2) ^ 3 by ring,
mul_rpow (by positivity) (by positivity),
← rpow_natCast _ 3, ← rpow_mul (sq_nonneg x), ← rpow_natCast _ 3, ← rpow_mul (sq_nonneg y),
show ((3 : ℕ) * ((1 : ℝ) / 3)) = 1 by norm_num, rpow_one, rpow_one] at key
linarith
end Real
end GeomMeanLEArithMean
section HarmMeanLEGeomMean
/-! ### HM-GM inequality -/
namespace Real
/-- **HM-GM inequality**: The harmonic mean is less than or equal to the geometric mean, weighted
version for real-valued nonnegative functions. -/
theorem harm_mean_le_geom_mean_weighted (w z : ι → ℝ) (hs : s.Nonempty) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < w i)
(hw' : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < z i) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i / z i)⁻¹ ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i := by
have : ∏ i ∈ s, (1 / z) i ^ w i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, w i * (1 / z) i :=
geom_mean_le_arith_mean_weighted s w (1/z) (fun i hi ↦ le_of_lt (hw i hi)) hw'
(fun i hi ↦ one_div_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt (hz i hi)))
have p_pos : 0 < ∏ i ∈ s, (z i)⁻¹ ^ w i :=
prod_pos fun i hi => rpow_pos_of_pos (inv_pos.2 (hz i hi)) _
have s_pos : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i * (z i)⁻¹ :=
sum_pos (fun i hi => mul_pos (hw i hi) (inv_pos.2 (hz i hi))) hs
norm_num at this
rw [← inv_le_inv₀ s_pos p_pos] at this
apply le_trans this
have p_pos₂ : 0 < (∏ i ∈ s, (z i) ^ w i)⁻¹ :=
inv_pos.2 (prod_pos fun i hi => rpow_pos_of_pos ((hz i hi)) _ )
rw [← inv_inv (∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i), inv_le_inv₀ p_pos p_pos₂, ← Finset.prod_inv_distrib]
gcongr
· exact fun i hi ↦ inv_nonneg.mpr (Real.rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt (hz i hi)) _)
· rw [Real.inv_rpow]; apply fun i hi ↦ le_of_lt (hz i hi); assumption
/-- **HM-GM inequality**: The **harmonic mean is less than or equal to the geometric mean. -/
theorem harm_mean_le_geom_mean {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (hs : s.Nonempty) (w : ι → ℝ)
(z : ι → ℝ) (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < w i) (hw' : 0 < ∑ i ∈ s, w i) (hz : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < z i) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i) / (∑ i ∈ s, w i / z i) ≤ (∏ i ∈ s, z i ^ w i) ^ (∑ i ∈ s, w i)⁻¹ := by
have := harm_mean_le_geom_mean_weighted s (fun i => (w i) / ∑ i ∈ s, w i) z hs ?_ ?_ hz
· simp only at this
set n := ∑ i ∈ s, w i
nth_rw 1 [div_eq_mul_inv, (show n = (n⁻¹)⁻¹ by norm_num), ← mul_inv, Finset.mul_sum _ _ n⁻¹]
simp_rw [inv_mul_eq_div n ((w _)/(z _)), div_right_comm _ _ n]
convert this
rw [← Real.finset_prod_rpow s _ (fun i hi ↦ Real.rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt <| hz i hi) _)]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun i hi => ?_)
rw [← Real.rpow_mul (le_of_lt <| hz i hi) (w _) n⁻¹, div_eq_mul_inv (w _) n]
· exact fun i hi ↦ div_pos (hw i hi) hw'
· simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv (w _) (∑ i ∈ s, w i), ← Finset.sum_mul _ _ (∑ i ∈ s, w i)⁻¹]
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ hw'.ne'
end Real
end HarmMeanLEGeomMean
section Young
/-! ### Young's inequality -/
namespace Real
/-- **Young's inequality**, a version for nonnegative real numbers. -/
theorem young_inequality_of_nonneg {a b p q : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b)
(hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) : a * b ≤ a ^ p / p + b ^ q / q := by
simpa [← rpow_mul, ha, hb, hpq.ne_zero, hpq.symm.ne_zero, _root_.div_eq_inv_mul] using
geom_mean_le_arith_mean2_weighted hpq.inv_nonneg hpq.symm.inv_nonneg
(rpow_nonneg ha p) (rpow_nonneg hb q) hpq.inv_add_inv_eq_one
/-- **Young's inequality**, a version for arbitrary real numbers. -/
theorem young_inequality (a b : ℝ) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
a * b ≤ |a| ^ p / p + |b| ^ q / q :=
calc
a * b ≤ |a * b| := le_abs_self (a * b)
_ = |a| * |b| := abs_mul a b
_ ≤ |a| ^ p / p + |b| ^ q / q :=
Real.young_inequality_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b) hpq
end Real
namespace NNReal
/-- **Young's inequality**, `ℝ≥0` version. We use `{p q : ℝ≥0}` in order to avoid constructing
witnesses of `0 ≤ p` and `0 ≤ q` for the denominators. -/
theorem young_inequality (a b : ℝ≥0) {p q : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
a * b ≤ a ^ (p : ℝ) / p + b ^ (q : ℝ) / q :=
Real.young_inequality_of_nonneg a.coe_nonneg b.coe_nonneg hpq.coe
/-- **Young's inequality**, `ℝ≥0` version with real conjugate exponents. -/
theorem young_inequality_real (a b : ℝ≥0) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
a * b ≤ a ^ p / Real.toNNReal p + b ^ q / Real.toNNReal q := by
simpa [Real.coe_toNNReal, hpq.nonneg, hpq.symm.nonneg] using young_inequality a b hpq.toNNReal
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- **Young's inequality**, `ℝ≥0∞` version with real conjugate exponents. -/
theorem young_inequality (a b : ℝ≥0∞) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
a * b ≤ a ^ p / ENNReal.ofReal p + b ^ q / ENNReal.ofReal q := by
by_cases h : a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤
· refine le_trans le_top (le_of_eq ?_)
repeat rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
rcases h with h | h <;> rw [h] <;> simp [h, hpq.pos, hpq.symm.pos]
push_neg at h
-- if a ≠ ⊤ and b ≠ ⊤, use the nnreal version: nnreal.young_inequality_real
rw [← coe_toNNReal h.left, ← coe_toNNReal h.right, ← coe_mul, ← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hpq.nonneg,
← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hpq.symm.nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ←
@coe_div (Real.toNNReal p) _ (by simp [hpq.pos]), ←
@coe_div (Real.toNNReal q) _ (by simp [hpq.symm.pos]), ← coe_add, coe_le_coe]
exact NNReal.young_inequality_real a.toNNReal b.toNNReal hpq
end ENNReal
end Young
section HoelderMinkowski
/-! ### Hölder's and Minkowski's inequalities -/
namespace NNReal
private theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lp_of_norm_le_one (f g : ι → ℝ≥0) {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) (hf : ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p ≤ 1) (hg : ∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q ≤ 1) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ 1 := by
have hp : 0 < p.toNNReal := zero_lt_one.trans hpq.toNNReal.lt
have hq : 0 < q.toNNReal := zero_lt_one.trans hpq.toNNReal.symm.lt
calc
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i ^ p / Real.toNNReal p + g i ^ q / Real.toNNReal q) :=
Finset.sum_le_sum fun i _ => young_inequality_real (f i) (g i) hpq
_ = (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) / Real.toNNReal p + (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) / Real.toNNReal q := by
rw [sum_add_distrib, sum_div, sum_div]
_ ≤ 1 / Real.toNNReal p + 1 / Real.toNNReal q := by
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> rwa [div_le_iff₀, div_mul_cancel₀] <;> positivity
_ = 1 := by simp_rw [one_div, hpq.toNNReal.inv_add_inv_eq_one]
private theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lp_of_norm_eq_zero (f g : ι → ℝ≥0) {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) (hf : ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p = 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
simp only [hf, hpq.ne_zero, one_div, sum_eq_zero_iff, zero_rpow, zero_mul,
inv_eq_zero, Ne, not_false_iff, le_zero_iff, mul_eq_zero]
intro i his
left
rw [sum_eq_zero_iff] at hf
exact (rpow_eq_zero_iff.mp (hf i his)).left
/-- **Hölder inequality**: The scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. Version for sums over finite sets,
with `ℝ≥0`-valued functions. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq (f g : ι → ℝ≥0) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
obtain hf | hf := eq_zero_or_pos (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p)
· exact inner_le_Lp_mul_Lp_of_norm_eq_zero s f g hpq hf
obtain hg | hg := eq_zero_or_pos (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q)
· calc
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i = ∑ i ∈ s, g i * f i := by
congr with i
rw [mul_comm]
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) * (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :=
(inner_le_Lp_mul_Lp_of_norm_eq_zero s g f hpq.symm hg)
_ = (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := mul_comm _ _
let f' i := f i / (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p)
let g' i := g i / (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q)
suffices (∑ i ∈ s, f' i * g' i) ≤ 1 by
simp_rw [f', g', div_mul_div_comm, ← sum_div] at this
rwa [div_le_iff₀, one_mul] at this
-- TODO: We are missing a positivity extension here
exact mul_pos (rpow_pos hf) (rpow_pos hg)
refine inner_le_Lp_mul_Lp_of_norm_le_one s f' g' hpq (le_of_eq ?_) (le_of_eq ?_)
· simp_rw [f', div_rpow, ← sum_div, ← rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel₀ hpq.ne_zero, rpow_one,
div_self hf.ne']
· simp_rw [g', div_rpow, ← sum_div, ← rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel₀ hpq.symm.ne_zero,
rpow_one, div_self hg.ne']
/-- **Weighted Hölder inequality**. -/
lemma inner_le_weight_mul_Lp (s : Finset ι) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (w f : ι → ℝ≥0) :
∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, w i) ^ (1 - p⁻¹) * (∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ^ p) ^ p⁻¹ := by
obtain rfl | hp := hp.eq_or_lt
· simp
calc
_ = ∑ i ∈ s, w i ^ (1 - p⁻¹) * (w i ^ p⁻¹ * f i) := ?_
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, (w i ^ (1 - p⁻¹)) ^ (1 - p⁻¹)⁻¹) ^ (1 / (1 - p⁻¹)⁻¹) *
(∑ i ∈ s, (w i ^ p⁻¹ * f i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :=
inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq _ _ _ (.symm <| Real.holderConjugate_iff.mpr ⟨hp, by simp⟩)
_ = _ := ?_
· congr with i
rw [← mul_assoc, ← rpow_of_add_eq _ one_ne_zero, rpow_one]
simp
· have hp₀ : p ≠ 0 := by positivity
have hp₁ : 1 - p⁻¹ ≠ 0 := by simp [sub_eq_zero, hp.ne']
simp [mul_rpow, div_inv_eq_mul, one_mul, one_div, hp₀, hp₁]
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. A version for `NNReal`-valued
functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the infinite sums are already expressed as
`p`-th powers, see `inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_hasSum`. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
(hf : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg : Summable fun i => g i ^ q) :
(Summable fun i => f i * g i) ∧
∑' i, f i * g i ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑' i, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
have H₁ : ∀ s : Finset ι,
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑' i, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
intro s
refine le_trans (inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq s f g hpq) (mul_le_mul ?_ ?_ bot_le bot_le)
· rw [NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.mpr hpq.pos)]
exact hf.sum_le_tsum _ (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
· rw [NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.mpr hpq.symm.pos)]
exact hg.sum_le_tsum _ (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
have bdd : BddAbove (Set.range fun s => ∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i) := by
refine ⟨(∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑' i, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q), ?_⟩
rintro a ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact H₁ s
have H₂ : Summable _ := (hasSum_of_isLUB _ (isLUB_ciSup bdd)).summable
exact ⟨H₂, H₂.tsum_le_of_sum_le H₁⟩
theorem summable_mul_of_Lp_Lq {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
(hf : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg : Summable fun i => g i ^ q) :
Summable fun i => f i * g i :=
(inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum hpq hf hg).1
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum' {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
(hf : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg : Summable fun i => g i ^ q) :
∑' i, f i * g i ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑' i, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) :=
(inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum hpq hf hg).2
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. A version for `NNReal`-valued
functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the infinite sums are not already expressed as
`p`-th powers, see `inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum`. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_hasSum {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {A B : ℝ≥0} {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) (hf : HasSum (fun i => f i ^ p) (A ^ p))
(hg : HasSum (fun i => g i ^ q) (B ^ q)) : ∃ C, C ≤ A * B ∧ HasSum (fun i => f i * g i) C := by
obtain ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum hpq hf.summable hg.summable
have hA : A = (∑' i : ι, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by rw [hf.tsum_eq, rpow_inv_rpow_self hpq.ne_zero]
have hB : B = (∑' i : ι, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [hg.tsum_eq, rpow_inv_rpow_self hpq.symm.ne_zero]
refine ⟨∑' i, f i * g i, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa [hA, hB] using H₂
· simpa only [rpow_self_rpow_inv hpq.ne_zero] using H₁.hasSum
/-- For `1 ≤ p`, the `p`-th power of the sum of `f i` is bounded above by a constant times the
sum of the `p`-th powers of `f i`. Version for sums over finite sets, with `ℝ≥0`-valued functions.
-/
theorem rpow_sum_le_const_mul_sum_rpow (f : ι → ℝ≥0) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ p ≤ (#s : ℝ≥0) ^ (p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hp with hp | hp
· simp [← hp]
let q : ℝ := p / (p - 1)
have hpq : p.HolderConjugate q := .conjExponent hp
have hp₁ : 1 / p * p = 1 := one_div_mul_cancel hpq.ne_zero
have hq : 1 / q * p = p - 1 := by
rw [← hpq.div_conj_eq_sub_one]
ring
simpa only [NNReal.mul_rpow, ← NNReal.rpow_mul, hp₁, hq, one_mul, one_rpow, rpow_one,
Pi.one_apply, sum_const, Nat.smul_one_eq_cast] using
NNReal.rpow_le_rpow (inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq s 1 f hpq.symm) hpq.nonneg
/-- The `L_p` seminorm of a vector `f` is the greatest value of the inner product
`∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i` over functions `g` of `L_q` seminorm less than or equal to one. -/
theorem isGreatest_Lp (f : ι → ℝ≥0) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
IsGreatest ((fun g : ι → ℝ≥0 => ∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i) '' { g | ∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q ≤ 1 })
((∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p)) := by
constructor
· use fun i => f i ^ p / f i / (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / q)
obtain hf | hf := eq_zero_or_pos (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p)
· simp [hf, hpq.ne_zero, hpq.symm.ne_zero]
· have A : p + q - q ≠ 0 := by simp [hpq.ne_zero]
have B : ∀ y : ℝ≥0, y * y ^ p / y = y ^ p := by
refine fun y => mul_div_cancel_left_of_imp fun h => ?_
simp [h, hpq.ne_zero]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, div_rpow, ← sum_div, ← rpow_mul,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hpq.symm.ne_zero, rpow_one, div_le_iff₀ hf, one_mul, hpq.mul_eq_add, ←
rpow_sub' A, add_sub_cancel_right, le_refl, true_and, ← mul_div_assoc, B]
rw [div_eq_iff, ← rpow_add hf.ne', one_div, one_div, hpq.inv_add_inv_eq_one, rpow_one]
simpa [hpq.symm.ne_zero] using hf.ne'
· rintro _ ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩
apply le_trans (inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq s f g hpq)
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (NNReal.rpow_le_one hg (le_of_lt hpq.symm.one_div_pos)) _
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the sum of two vectors is less than or equal
to the sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands. A version for `NNReal`-valued functions. -/
theorem Lp_add_le (f g : ι → ℝ≥0) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
(∑ i ∈ s, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by
-- The result is trivial when `p = 1`, so we can assume `1 < p`.
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hp with (rfl | hp)
· simp [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
have hpq := Real.HolderConjugate.conjExponent hp
have := isGreatest_Lp s (f + g) hpq
simp only [Pi.add_apply, add_mul, sum_add_distrib] at this
rcases this.1 with ⟨φ, hφ, H⟩
rw [← H]
exact
add_le_add ((isGreatest_Lp s f hpq).2 ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩) ((isGreatest_Lp s g hpq).2 ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩)
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the infinite sum of two vectors is less than or
equal to the infinite sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands, if these infinite sums both
exist. A version for `NNReal`-valued functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the
infinite sums are already expressed as `p`-th powers, see `Lp_add_le_hasSum_of_nonneg`. -/
theorem Lp_add_le_tsum {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : Summable fun i => f i ^ p)
(hg : Summable fun i => g i ^ p) :
(Summable fun i => (f i + g i) ^ p) ∧
(∑' i, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑' i, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by
have pos : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp
have H₁ : ∀ s : Finset ι,
(∑ i ∈ s, (f i + g i) ^ p) ≤
((∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑' i, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p)) ^ p := by
intro s
rw [one_div, ← NNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff pos, ← one_div]
refine le_trans (Lp_add_le s f g hp) (add_le_add ?_ ?_) <;>
rw [NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.mpr pos)] <;>
refine Summable.sum_le_tsum _ (fun _ _ => zero_le _) ?_
exacts [hf, hg]
have bdd : BddAbove (Set.range fun s => ∑ i ∈ s, (f i + g i) ^ p) := by
refine ⟨((∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑' i, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p)) ^ p, ?_⟩
rintro a ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact H₁ s
have H₂ : Summable _ := (hasSum_of_isLUB _ (isLUB_ciSup bdd)).summable
refine ⟨H₂, ?_⟩
rw [one_div, NNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff pos, ← one_div]
exact H₂.tsum_le_of_sum_le H₁
theorem summable_Lp_add {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : Summable fun i => f i ^ p)
(hg : Summable fun i => g i ^ p) : Summable fun i => (f i + g i) ^ p :=
(Lp_add_le_tsum hp hf hg).1
theorem Lp_add_le_tsum' {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : Summable fun i => f i ^ p)
(hg : Summable fun i => g i ^ p) :
(∑' i, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑' i, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :=
(Lp_add_le_tsum hp hf hg).2
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the infinite sum of two vectors is less than or
equal to the infinite sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands, if these infinite sums both
exist. A version for `NNReal`-valued functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the
infinite sums are not already expressed as `p`-th powers, see `Lp_add_le_tsum_of_nonneg`. -/
theorem Lp_add_le_hasSum {f g : ι → ℝ≥0} {A B : ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf : HasSum (fun i => f i ^ p) (A ^ p)) (hg : HasSum (fun i => g i ^ p) (B ^ p)) :
∃ C, C ≤ A + B ∧ HasSum (fun i => (f i + g i) ^ p) (C ^ p) := by
have hp' : p ≠ 0 := (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp).ne'
obtain ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := Lp_add_le_tsum hp hf.summable hg.summable
have hA : A = (∑' i : ι, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by rw [hf.tsum_eq, rpow_inv_rpow_self hp']
have hB : B = (∑' i : ι, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by rw [hg.tsum_eq, rpow_inv_rpow_self hp']
refine ⟨(∑' i, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p), ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa [hA, hB] using H₂
· simpa only [rpow_self_rpow_inv hp'] using H₁.hasSum
end NNReal
namespace Real
variable (f g : ι → ℝ) {p q : ℝ}
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. Version for sums over finite sets,
with real-valued functions. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq (hpq : HolderConjugate p q) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, |f i| ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑ i ∈ s, |g i| ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
have :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.2
(NNReal.inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq s (fun i => ⟨_, abs_nonneg (f i)⟩) (fun i => ⟨_, abs_nonneg (g i)⟩)
hpq)
push_cast at this
refine le_trans (sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_) this
simp only [← abs_mul, le_abs_self]
/-- For `1 ≤ p`, the `p`-th power of the sum of `f i` is bounded above by a constant times the
sum of the `p`-th powers of `f i`. Version for sums over finite sets, with `ℝ`-valued functions. -/
theorem rpow_sum_le_const_mul_sum_rpow (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
(∑ i ∈ s, |f i|) ^ p ≤ (#s : ℝ) ^ (p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ s, |f i| ^ p := by
have :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.2
(NNReal.rpow_sum_le_const_mul_sum_rpow s (fun i => ⟨_, abs_nonneg (f i)⟩) hp)
push_cast at this
exact this
-- for some reason `exact_mod_cast` can't replace this argument
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the sum of two vectors is less than or equal
to the sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands. A version for `Real`-valued functions. -/
theorem Lp_add_le (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
(∑ i ∈ s, |f i + g i| ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑ i ∈ s, |f i| ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑ i ∈ s, |g i| ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by
have :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.2
(NNReal.Lp_add_le s (fun i => ⟨_, abs_nonneg (f i)⟩) (fun i => ⟨_, abs_nonneg (g i)⟩) hp)
push_cast at this
refine le_trans (rpow_le_rpow ?_ (sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_) ?_) this <;>
simp [sum_nonneg, rpow_nonneg, abs_nonneg, le_trans zero_le_one hp, abs_add,
rpow_le_rpow]
variable {f g}
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. Version for sums over finite sets,
with real-valued nonnegative functions. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg (hpq : HolderConjugate p q) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i)
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g i) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
convert inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq s f g hpq using 3 <;> apply sum_congr rfl <;> intro i hi <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonneg, hf i hi, hg i hi]
/-- **Weighted Hölder inequality**. -/
lemma inner_le_weight_mul_Lp_of_nonneg (s : Finset ι) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (w f : ι → ℝ)
(hw : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) :
∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, w i) ^ (1 - p⁻¹) * (∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ^ p) ^ p⁻¹ := by
lift w to ι → ℝ≥0 using hw
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
beta_reduce at *
norm_cast at *
exact NNReal.inner_le_weight_mul_Lp _ hp _ _
/-- **Weighted Hölder inequality** in terms of `Finset.expect`. -/
lemma compact_inner_le_weight_mul_Lp_of_nonneg (s : Finset ι) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) {w f : ι → ℝ}
(hw : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) :
𝔼 i ∈ s, w i * f i ≤ (𝔼 i ∈ s, w i) ^ (1 - p⁻¹) * (𝔼 i ∈ s, w i * f i ^ p) ^ p⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [expect_eq_sum_div_card]
rw [div_rpow, div_rpow, div_mul_div_comm, ← rpow_add', sub_add_cancel, rpow_one]
· gcongr
exact inner_le_weight_mul_Lp_of_nonneg s hp _ _ hw hf
any_goals simp
· exact sum_nonneg fun i _ ↦ by have := hw i; have := hf i; positivity
· exact sum_nonneg fun i _ ↦ by have := hw i; positivity
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. A version for `ℝ`-valued functions.
For an alternative version, convenient if the infinite sums are already expressed as `p`-th powers,
see `inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_hasSum_of_nonneg`. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum_of_nonneg (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i)
(hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i) (hf_sum : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg_sum : Summable fun i => g i ^ q) :
(Summable fun i => f i * g i) ∧
∑' i, f i * g i ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑' i, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift g to ι → ℝ≥0 using hg
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734, `norm_cast` needs help with beta reduction.
beta_reduce at *
norm_cast at *
exact NNReal.inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum hpq hf_sum hg_sum
theorem summable_mul_of_Lp_Lq_of_nonneg (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i)
(hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i) (hf_sum : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg_sum : Summable fun i => g i ^ q) :
Summable fun i => f i * g i :=
(inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum_of_nonneg hpq hf hg hf_sum hg_sum).1
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum_of_nonneg' (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i)
(hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i) (hf_sum : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg_sum : Summable fun i => g i ^ q) :
∑' i, f i * g i ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑' i, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) :=
(inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum_of_nonneg hpq hf hg hf_sum hg_sum).2
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. A version for `NNReal`-valued
functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the infinite sums are not already expressed as
`p`-th powers, see `inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_tsum_of_nonneg`. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_hasSum_of_nonneg (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) {A B : ℝ} (hA : 0 ≤ A)
(hB : 0 ≤ B) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i)
(hf_sum : HasSum (fun i => f i ^ p) (A ^ p)) (hg_sum : HasSum (fun i => g i ^ q) (B ^ q)) :
∃ C : ℝ, 0 ≤ C ∧ C ≤ A * B ∧ HasSum (fun i => f i * g i) C := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift g to ι → ℝ≥0 using hg
lift A to ℝ≥0 using hA
lift B to ℝ≥0 using hB
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734, `norm_cast` needs help with beta reduction.
beta_reduce at *
norm_cast at hf_sum hg_sum
obtain ⟨C, hC, H⟩ := NNReal.inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq_hasSum hpq hf_sum hg_sum
refine ⟨C, C.prop, hC, ?_⟩
norm_cast
/-- For `1 ≤ p`, the `p`-th power of the sum of `f i` is bounded above by a constant times the
sum of the `p`-th powers of `f i`. Version for sums over finite sets, with nonnegative `ℝ`-valued
functions. -/
theorem rpow_sum_le_const_mul_sum_rpow_of_nonneg (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ p ≤ (#s : ℝ) ^ (p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p := by
convert rpow_sum_le_const_mul_sum_rpow s f hp using 2 <;> apply sum_congr rfl <;> intro i hi <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonneg, hf i hi]
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the sum of two vectors is less than or equal
to the sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands. A version for `ℝ`-valued nonnegative
functions. -/
theorem Lp_add_le_of_nonneg (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g i) :
(∑ i ∈ s, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by
convert Lp_add_le s f g hp using 2 <;> [skip;congr 1;congr 1] <;> apply sum_congr rfl <;>
intro i hi <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonneg, hf i hi, hg i hi, add_nonneg]
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the infinite sum of two vectors is less than or
equal to the infinite sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands, if these infinite sums both
exist. A version for `ℝ`-valued functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the infinite
sums are already expressed as `p`-th powers, see `Lp_add_le_hasSum_of_nonneg`. -/
theorem Lp_add_le_tsum_of_nonneg (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i)
(hf_sum : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg_sum : Summable fun i => g i ^ p) :
(Summable fun i => (f i + g i) ^ p) ∧
(∑' i, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑' i, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift g to ι → ℝ≥0 using hg
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734, `norm_cast` needs help with beta reduction.
beta_reduce at *
norm_cast0 at *
exact NNReal.Lp_add_le_tsum hp hf_sum hg_sum
theorem summable_Lp_add_of_nonneg (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i)
(hf_sum : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg_sum : Summable fun i => g i ^ p) :
Summable fun i => (f i + g i) ^ p :=
(Lp_add_le_tsum_of_nonneg hp hf hg hf_sum hg_sum).1
theorem Lp_add_le_tsum_of_nonneg' (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i)
(hf_sum : Summable fun i => f i ^ p) (hg_sum : Summable fun i => g i ^ p) :
(∑' i, (f i + g i) ^ p) ^ (1 / p) ≤ (∑' i, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) + (∑' i, g i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) :=
(Lp_add_le_tsum_of_nonneg hp hf hg hf_sum hg_sum).2
/-- **Minkowski inequality**: the `L_p` seminorm of the infinite sum of two vectors is less than or
equal to the infinite sum of the `L_p`-seminorms of the summands, if these infinite sums both
exist. A version for `ℝ`-valued functions. For an alternative version, convenient if the infinite
sums are not already expressed as `p`-th powers, see `Lp_add_le_tsum_of_nonneg`. -/
theorem Lp_add_le_hasSum_of_nonneg (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i) {A B : ℝ}
(hA : 0 ≤ A) (hB : 0 ≤ B) (hfA : HasSum (fun i => f i ^ p) (A ^ p))
(hgB : HasSum (fun i => g i ^ p) (B ^ p)) :
∃ C, 0 ≤ C ∧ C ≤ A + B ∧ HasSum (fun i => (f i + g i) ^ p) (C ^ p) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift g to ι → ℝ≥0 using hg
lift A to ℝ≥0 using hA
lift B to ℝ≥0 using hB
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734, `norm_cast` needs help with beta reduction.
beta_reduce at hfA hgB
norm_cast at hfA hgB
obtain ⟨C, hC₁, hC₂⟩ := NNReal.Lp_add_le_hasSum hp hfA hgB
use C
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734, `norm_cast` needs help with beta reduction.
beta_reduce
norm_cast
exact ⟨zero_le _, hC₁, hC₂⟩
end Real
namespace ENNReal
variable (f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞) {p q : ℝ}
/-- **Hölder inequality**: the scalar product of two functions is bounded by the product of their
`L^p` and `L^q` norms when `p` and `q` are conjugate exponents. Version for sums over finite sets,
with `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions. -/
theorem inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) := by
by_cases H : (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) = 0 ∨ (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) = 0
· replace H : (∀ i ∈ s, f i = 0) ∨ ∀ i ∈ s, g i = 0 := by
simpa [ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hpq.pos, hpq.symm.pos, asymm hpq.pos, asymm hpq.symm.pos,
sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg] using H
have : ∀ i ∈ s, f i * g i = 0 := fun i hi => by rcases H with H | H <;> simp [H i hi]
simp [sum_eq_zero this]
push_neg at H
by_cases H' : (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ p) ^ (1 / p) = ⊤ ∨ (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ q) ^ (1 / q) = ⊤
· rcases H' with H' | H' <;> simp [H', -one_div, -sum_eq_zero_iff, -rpow_eq_zero_iff, H]
replace H' : (∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ⊤) ∧ ∀ i ∈ s, g i ≠ ⊤ := by
simpa [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, asymm hpq.pos, asymm hpq.symm.pos, hpq.pos, hpq.symm.pos,
ENNReal.sum_eq_top, not_or] using H'
have := ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (@NNReal.inner_le_Lp_mul_Lq _ s (fun i => ENNReal.toNNReal (f i))
(fun i => ENNReal.toNNReal (g i)) _ _ hpq)
simp [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hpq.pos.le, hpq.one_div_pos.le, hpq.symm.pos.le,
hpq.symm.one_div_pos.le] at this
convert this using 1 <;> [skip; congr 2] <;> [skip; skip; simp; skip; simp] <;>
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
| simp [H'.1 i hi, H'.2 i hi, -WithZero.coe_mul]
/-- **Weighted Hölder inequality**. -/
lemma inner_le_weight_mul_Lp_of_nonneg (s : Finset ι) {p : ℝ} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (w f : ι → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, w i) ^ (1 - p⁻¹) * (∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ^ p) ^ p⁻¹ := by
obtain rfl | hp := hp.eq_or_lt
· simp
have hp₀ : 0 < p := by positivity
have hp₁ : p⁻¹ < 1 := inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ hp
by_cases H : (∑ i ∈ s, w i) ^ (1 - p⁻¹) = 0 ∨ (∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ^ p) ^ p⁻¹ = 0
· replace H : (∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0) ∨ ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 ∨ f i = 0 := by
simpa [hp₀, hp₁, hp₀.not_lt, hp₁.not_lt, sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg] using H
have (i) (hi : i ∈ s) : w i * f i = 0 := by rcases H with H | H <;> simp [H i hi]
simp [sum_eq_zero this]
push_neg at H
by_cases H' : (∑ i ∈ s, w i) ^ (1 - p⁻¹) = ⊤ ∨ (∑ i ∈ s, w i * f i ^ p) ^ p⁻¹ = ⊤
| Mathlib/Analysis/MeanInequalities.lean | 909 | 924 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Discrete.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
/-!
# Binary (co)products
We define a category `WalkingPair`, which is the index category
for a binary (co)product diagram. A convenience method `pair X Y`
constructs the functor from the walking pair, hitting the given objects.
We define `prod X Y` and `coprod X Y` as limits and colimits of such functors.
Typeclasses `HasBinaryProducts` and `HasBinaryCoproducts` assert the existence
of (co)limits shaped as walking pairs.
We include lemmas for simplifying equations involving projections and coprojections, and define
braiding and associating isomorphisms, and the product comparison morphism.
## References
* [Stacks: Products of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001R)
* [Stacks: coproducts of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04AN)
-/
universe v v₁ u u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a binary (co)product. -/
inductive WalkingPair : Type
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open WalkingPair
/-- The equivalence swapping left and right.
-/
def WalkingPair.swap : WalkingPair ≃ WalkingPair where
toFun
| left => right
| right => left
invFun
| left => right
| right => left
left_inv j := by cases j <;> rfl
right_inv j := by cases j <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_left : WalkingPair.swap left = right :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_right : WalkingPair.swap right = left :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt : WalkingPair.swap.symm left = right :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff : WalkingPair.swap.symm right = left :=
rfl
/-- An equivalence from `WalkingPair` to `Bool`, sometimes useful when reindexing limits.
-/
def WalkingPair.equivBool : WalkingPair ≃ Bool where
toFun
| left => true
| right => false
-- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
invFun b := Bool.recOn b right left
left_inv j := by cases j <;> rfl
right_inv b := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left : WalkingPair.equivBool left = true :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right : WalkingPair.equivBool right = false :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm true = left :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm false = right :=
rfl
variable {C : Type u}
/-- The function on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pairFunction (X Y : C) : WalkingPair → C := fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_left (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y left = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_right (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y right = Y :=
rfl
variable [Category.{v} C]
/-- The diagram on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pair (X Y : C) : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C :=
Discrete.functor fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨left⟩ = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨right⟩ = Y :=
rfl
section
variable {F G : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨left⟩)
(g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨right⟩)
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
/-- The natural transformation between two functors out of the
walking pair, specified by its components. -/
def mapPair : F ⟶ G where
app
| ⟨left⟩ => f
| ⟨right⟩ => g
naturality := fun ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_left : (mapPair f g).app ⟨left⟩ = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_right : (mapPair f g).app ⟨right⟩ = g :=
rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism between two functors out of the walking pair, specified by its
components. -/
@[simps!]
def mapPairIso (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨left⟩) (g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨right⟩) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j ↦ match j with
| ⟨left⟩ => f
| ⟨right⟩ => g)
(fun ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat)
end
/-- Every functor out of the walking pair is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `pair` -/
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoPair (F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) :=
mapPairIso (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
section
variable {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D]
/-- The natural isomorphism between `pair X Y ⋙ F` and `pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)`. -/
def pairComp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagramIsoPair _
end
/-- A binary fan is just a cone on a diagram indexing a product. -/
abbrev BinaryFan (X Y : C) :=
Cone (pair X Y)
/-- The first projection of a binary fan. -/
abbrev BinaryFan.fst {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
/-- The second projection of a binary fan. -/
abbrev BinaryFan.snd {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.snd :=
rfl
/-- Constructs an isomorphism of `BinaryFan`s out of an isomorphism of the tips that commutes with
the projections. -/
def BinaryFan.ext {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryFan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.fst = e.hom ≫ c'.fst) (h₂ : c.snd = e.hom ≫ c'.snd) : c ≅ c' :=
Cones.ext e (fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> assumption)
@[simp]
lemma BinaryFan.ext_hom_hom {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryFan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.fst = e.hom ≫ c'.fst) (h₂ : c.snd = e.hom ≫ c'.snd) :
(ext e h₁ h₂).hom.hom = e.hom := rfl
/-- A convenient way to show that a binary fan is a limit. -/
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y)
(lift : ∀ {T : C} (_ : T ⟶ X) (_ : T ⟶ Y), T ⟶ s.pt)
(hl₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.fst = f)
(hl₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.snd = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (m : T ⟶ s.pt) (_ : m ≫ s.fst = f) (_ : m ≫ s.snd = g),
m = lift f g) :
IsLimit s :=
Limits.IsLimit.mk (fun t => lift (BinaryFan.fst t) (BinaryFan.snd t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hl₁ _ _
· exact hl₂ _ _)
fun _ _ h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
theorem BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) {f g : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
/-- A binary cofan is just a cocone on a diagram indexing a coproduct. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan (X Y : C) := Cocone (pair X Y)
/-- The first inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
/-- The second inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
/-- Constructs an isomorphism of `BinaryCofan`s out of an isomorphism of the tips that commutes with
the injections. -/
def BinaryCofan.ext {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryCofan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.inl ≫ e.hom = c'.inl) (h₂ : c.inr ≫ e.hom = c'.inr) : c ≅ c' :=
Cocones.ext e (fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> assumption)
@[simp]
lemma BinaryCofan.ext_hom_hom {A B : C} {c c' : BinaryCofan A B} (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(h₁ : c.inl ≫ e.hom = c'.inl) (h₂ : c.inr ≫ e.hom = c'.inr) :
(ext e h₁ h₂).hom.hom = e.hom := rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.inl := rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.inr := rfl
/-- A convenient way to show that a binary cofan is a colimit. -/
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y)
(desc : ∀ {T : C} (_ : X ⟶ T) (_ : Y ⟶ T), s.pt ⟶ T)
(hd₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inl ≫ desc f g = f)
(hd₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inr ≫ desc f g = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (m : s.pt ⟶ T) (_ : s.inl ≫ m = f) (_ : s.inr ≫ m = g),
m = desc f g) :
IsColimit s :=
Limits.IsColimit.mk (fun t => desc (BinaryCofan.inl t) (BinaryCofan.inr t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hd₁ _ _
· exact hd₂ _ _)
fun _ _ h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
theorem BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s)
{f g : s.pt ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
variable {X Y : C}
section
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- A binary fan with vertex `P` consists of the two projections `π₁ : P ⟶ X` and `π₂ : P ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps pt]
def BinaryFan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : BinaryFan X Y where
pt := P
π := { app := fun | { as := j } => match j with | left => π₁ | right => π₂ }
/-- A binary cofan with vertex `P` consists of the two inclusions `ι₁ : X ⟶ P` and `ι₂ : Y ⟶ P`. -/
@[simps pt]
def BinaryCofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : BinaryCofan X Y where
pt := P
ι := { app := fun | { as := j } => match j with | left => ι₁ | right => ι₂ }
end
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_fst {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).fst = π₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_snd {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).snd = π₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inl {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inl = ι₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inr {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inr = ι₂ :=
rfl
/-- Every `BinaryFan` is isomorphic to an application of `BinaryFan.mk`. -/
def isoBinaryFanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryFan.mk c.fst c.snd :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun ⟨l⟩ => by cases l; repeat simp
/-- Every `BinaryFan` is isomorphic to an application of `BinaryFan.mk`. -/
def isoBinaryCofanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryCofan.mk c.inl c.inr :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun ⟨l⟩ => by cases l; repeat simp
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `BinaryFan` constructed using
`BinaryFan.mk` is a limit cone.
-/
def BinaryFan.isLimitMk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (lift : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryFan X Y) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk fst snd) :=
{ lift := lift
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `BinaryCofan` constructed using
`BinaryCofan.mk` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def BinaryCofan.isColimitMk {W : C} {inl : X ⟶ W} {inr : Y ⟶ W}
(desc : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryCofan X Y) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk inl inr) :=
{ desc := desc
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
/-- If `s` is a limit binary fan over `X` and `Y`, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and
`g : W ⟶ Y` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ s.pt` satisfying `l ≫ s.fst = f` and `l ≫ s.snd = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g } :=
⟨h.lift <| BinaryFan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
/-- If `s` is a colimit binary cofan over `X` and `Y`,, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : s.pt ⟶ W` satisfying `s.inl ≫ l = f` and `s.inr ≫ l = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨h.desc <| BinaryCofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
/-- Binary products are symmetric. -/
def BinaryFan.isLimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryFan X Y} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => hc.lift (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal Y) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.fst := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' H (𝟙 X) (h.from X)
exact
⟨⟨l,
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext H (by simpa [hl, -Category.comp_id] using Category.comp_id _)
(h.hom_ext _ _),
hl⟩⟩
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f _ => f ≫ inv c.fst) (fun _ _ => by simp)
(fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ => by simp [← e]⟩
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal X) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.snd := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst h (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some).ofIsoLimit (isoBinaryFanMk c).symm⟩⟩
/-- If `X' ≅ X`, then `X × Y` also is the product of `X'` and `Y`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : X ⟶ X')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (c.fst ≫ f) c.snd) := by
fapply BinaryFan.isLimitMk
· exact fun s => h.lift (BinaryFan.mk (s.fst ≫ inv f) s.snd)
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [Category.comp_id,BinaryFan.π_app_left,IsIso.inv_hom_id,
BinaryFan.mk_fst,IsLimit.fac_assoc,eq_self_iff_true,Category.assoc]
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,eq_self_iff_true,IsLimit.fac]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: simpa timed out here also
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext h
· simpa only
[BinaryFan.π_app_left,BinaryFan.mk_fst,Category.assoc,IsLimit.fac,IsIso.eq_comp_inv]
· simpa only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,IsLimit.fac]
/-- If `Y' ≅ Y`, then `X x Y` also is the product of `X` and `Y'`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : Y ⟶ Y')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.fst (c.snd ≫ f)) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitFlip <| BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h)
/-- Binary coproducts are symmetric. -/
def BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial Y) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inl := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' H (𝟙 X) (h.to X)
refine ⟨⟨l, hl, BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext H (?_) (h.hom_ext _ _)⟩⟩
rw [Category.comp_id]
have e : (inl c ≫ l) ≫ inl c = 𝟙 X ≫ inl c := congrArg (·≫inl c) hl
rwa [Category.assoc,Category.id_comp] at e
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f _ => inv c.inl ≫ f)
(fun _ _ => IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc _ _) (fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ =>
(IsIso.eq_inv_comp _).mpr e⟩
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial X) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inr := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl h (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some).ofIsoColimit (isoBinaryCofanMk c).symm⟩⟩
/-- If `X' ≅ X`, then `X ⨿ Y` also is the coproduct of `X'` and `Y`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : X' ⟶ X)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (f ≫ c.inl) c.inr) := by
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s => h.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (inv f ≫ s.inl) s.inr)
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
apply BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext h
· rw [← cancel_epi f]
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc] using e₁
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
· simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
/-- If `Y' ≅ Y`, then `X ⨿ Y` also is the coproduct of `X` and `Y'`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : Y' ⟶ Y)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inl (f ≫ c.inr)) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip <| BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h)
/-- An abbreviation for `HasLimit (pair X Y)`. -/
abbrev HasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) :=
HasLimit (pair X Y)
/-- An abbreviation for `HasColimit (pair X Y)`. -/
abbrev HasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) :=
HasColimit (pair X Y)
/-- If we have a product of `X` and `Y`, we can access it using `prod X Y` or
`X ⨯ Y`. -/
noncomputable abbrev prod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :=
limit (pair X Y)
/-- If we have a coproduct of `X` and `Y`, we can access it using `coprod X Y` or
`X ⨿ Y`. -/
noncomputable abbrev coprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :=
colimit (pair X Y)
/-- Notation for the product -/
notation:20 X " ⨯ " Y:20 => prod X Y
/-- Notation for the coproduct -/
notation:20 X " ⨿ " Y:20 => coprod X Y
/-- The projection map to the first component of the product. -/
noncomputable abbrev prod.fst {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
/-- The projection map to the second component of the product. -/
noncomputable abbrev prod.snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
/-- The inclusion map from the first component of the coproduct. -/
noncomputable abbrev coprod.inl {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
/-- The inclusion map from the second component of the coproduct. -/
noncomputable abbrev coprod.inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
/-- The binary fan constructed from the projection maps is a limit. -/
noncomputable def prodIsProd (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) prod.snd) :=
(limit.isLimit _).ofIsoLimit (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
))
/-- The binary cofan constructed from the coprojection maps is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def coprodIsCoprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) coprod.inr) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).ofIsoColimit (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
))
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] {f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y}
(h₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext (limit.isLimit _) h₁ h₂
@[ext 1100]
theorem coprod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] {f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W}
(h₁ : coprod.inl ≫ f = coprod.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : coprod.inr ≫ f = coprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (colimit.isColimit _) h₁ h₂
/-- If the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and `g : W ⟶ Y`
induces a morphism `prod.lift f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y`. -/
noncomputable abbrev prod.lift {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y]
(f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y :=
limit.lift _ (BinaryFan.mk f g)
/-- diagonal arrow of the binary product in the category `fam I` -/
noncomputable abbrev diag (X : C) [HasBinaryProduct X X] : X ⟶ X ⨯ X :=
prod.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
/-- If the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `coprod.desc f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W`. -/
noncomputable abbrev coprod.desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y]
(f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (BinaryCofan.mk f g)
/-- codiagonal arrow of the binary coproduct -/
noncomputable abbrev codiag (X : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] : X ⨿ X ⟶ X :=
coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.fst = f :=
limit.lift_π _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.snd = g :=
limit.lift_π _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc f g = f :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc f g = g :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono f] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono g] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_snd _ _
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi f] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inl_desc _ _
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi g] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inr_desc _ _
/-- If the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and `g : W ⟶ Y`
induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y` satisfying `l ≫ Prod.fst = f` and `l ≫ Prod.snd = g`. -/
noncomputable def prod.lift' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
{ l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y // l ≫ prod.fst = f ∧ l ≫ prod.snd = g } :=
⟨prod.lift f g, prod.lift_fst _ _, prod.lift_snd _ _⟩
/-- If the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W` satisfying `coprod.inl ≫ l = f` and
`coprod.inr ≫ l = g`. -/
noncomputable def coprod.desc' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
{ l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W // coprod.inl ≫ l = f ∧ coprod.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨coprod.desc f g, coprod.inl_desc _ _, coprod.inr_desc _ _⟩
/-- If the products `W ⨯ X` and `Y ⨯ Z` exist, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ Y` and
`g : X ⟶ Z` induces a morphism `prod.map f g : W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z`. -/
noncomputable def prod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z :=
limMap (mapPair f g)
/-- If the coproducts `W ⨿ X` and `Y ⨿ Z` exist, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ Y` and
`g : W ⟶ Z` induces a morphism `coprod.map f g : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z`. -/
noncomputable def coprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z :=
colimMap (mapPair f g)
noncomputable section ProdLemmas
-- Making the reassoc version of this a simp lemma seems to be more harmful than helpful.
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem prod.comp_lift {V W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : W ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ prod.lift g h = prod.lift (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h) := by ext <;> simp
theorem prod.comp_diag {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct Y Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ diag Y = prod.lift f f := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_fst {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst ≫ f :=
limMap_π _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_snd {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.snd = prod.snd ≫ g :=
limMap_π _ _
@[simp]
theorem prod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : prod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem prod.lift_fst_snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
prod.lift prod.fst prod.snd = 𝟙 (X ⨯ Y) := by ext <;> simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.lift_map {V W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : V ⟶ W)
(g : V ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) (k : X ⟶ Z) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.lift (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W Y] [HasBinaryProduct X Z]
(g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) : prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ g) (prod.snd ≫ g') = prod.map g g' := by
rw [← prod.lift_map]
simp
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `map_fst` and `map_snd` can still work just
-- as well.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C} [HasBinaryProduct A₁ B₁] [HasBinaryProduct A₂ B₂]
[HasBinaryProduct A₃ B₃] (f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
prod.map f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by ext <;> simp
-- TODO: is it necessary to weaken the assumption here?
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] :
prod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 B) = prod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ prod.map (𝟙 Y) f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.map_comp_id {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasBinaryProduct X W]
[HasBinaryProduct Z W] [HasBinaryProduct Y W] :
prod.map (f ≫ g) (𝟙 W) = prod.map f (𝟙 W) ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 W) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.map_id_comp {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasBinaryProduct W X]
[HasBinaryProduct W Y] [HasBinaryProduct W Z] :
prod.map (𝟙 W) (f ≫ g) = prod.map (𝟙 W) f ≫ prod.map (𝟙 W) g := by simp
/-- If the products `W ⨯ X` and `Y ⨯ Z` exist, then every pair of isomorphisms `f : W ≅ Y` and
`g : X ≅ Z` induces an isomorphism `prod.mapIso f g : W ⨯ X ≅ Y ⨯ Z`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.mapIso {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ≅ Y)
(g : X ≅ Z) : W ⨯ X ≅ Y ⨯ Z where
hom := prod.map f.hom g.hom
inv := prod.map f.inv g.inv
instance isIso_prod {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsIso g] : IsIso (prod.map f g) :=
| (prod.mapIso (asIso f) (asIso g)).isIso_hom
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/BinaryProducts.lean | 706 | 707 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Gabriel Moise. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Moise, Yaël Dillies, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
/-!
# Incidence matrix of a simple graph
This file defines the unoriented incidence matrix of a simple graph.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix`: `G.incMatrix R` is the incidence matrix of `G` over the ring `R`.
## Main results
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix_mul_transpose_diag`: The diagonal entries of the product of
`G.incMatrix R` and its transpose are the degrees of the vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix_mul_transpose`: Gives a complete description of the product of
`G.incMatrix R` and its transpose; the diagonal is the degrees of each vertex, and the
off-diagonals are 1 or 0 depending on whether or not the vertices are adjacent.
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix_transpose_mul_diag`: The diagonal entries of the product of the
transpose of `G.incMatrix R` and `G.inc_matrix R` are `2` or `0` depending on whether or
not the unordered pair is an edge of `G`.
## Implementation notes
The usual definition of an incidence matrix has one row per vertex and one column per edge.
However, this definition has columns indexed by all of `Sym2 α`, where `α` is the vertex type.
This appears not to change the theory, and for simple graphs it has the nice effect that every
incidence matrix for each `SimpleGraph α` has the same type.
## TODO
* Define the oriented incidence matrices for oriented graphs.
* Define the graph Laplacian of a simple graph using the oriented incidence matrix from an
arbitrary orientation of a simple graph.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph Sym2
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (R : Type*) {α : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph α)
/-- `G.incMatrix R` is the `α × Sym2 α` matrix whose `(a, e)`-entry is `1` if `e` is incident to
`a` and `0` otherwise. -/
noncomputable def incMatrix [Zero R] [One R] : Matrix α (Sym2 α) R := fun a =>
(G.incidenceSet a).indicator 1
variable {R}
theorem incMatrix_apply [Zero R] [One R] {a : α} {e : Sym2 α} :
G.incMatrix R a e = (G.incidenceSet a).indicator 1 e :=
rfl
/-- Entries of the incidence matrix can be computed given additional decidable instances. -/
theorem incMatrix_apply' [Zero R] [One R] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {a : α}
{e : Sym2 α} : G.incMatrix R a e = if e ∈ G.incidenceSet a then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [incMatrix, Set.indicator, Pi.one_apply]
section MulZeroOneClass
variable [MulZeroOneClass R] {a b : α} {e : Sym2 α}
theorem incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply : G.incMatrix R a e * G.incMatrix R b e =
(G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b).indicator 1 e := by
classical simp only [incMatrix, Set.indicator_apply, ite_zero_mul_ite_zero, Pi.one_apply, mul_one,
Set.mem_inter_iff]
theorem incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply_of_not_adj (hab : a ≠ b) (h : ¬G.Adj a b) :
G.incMatrix R a e * G.incMatrix R b e = 0 := by
rw [incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
rw [G.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_not_adj h hab]
exact Set.not_mem_empty e
theorem incMatrix_of_not_mem_incidenceSet (h : e ∉ G.incidenceSet a) : G.incMatrix R a e = 0 := by
rw [incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem h]
|
theorem incMatrix_of_mem_incidenceSet (h : e ∈ G.incidenceSet a) : G.incMatrix R a e = 1 := by
rw [incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem h, Pi.one_apply]
variable [Nontrivial R]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/IncMatrix.lean | 85 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`K.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = K.orthogonalProjection u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `K.reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `K.reflection u` to satisfy
`u + (K.reflection u) = 2 • K.orthogonalProjection u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open InnerProductSpace
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Finsupp
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- **Existence of minimizers**, aka the **Hilbert projection theorem**.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`. -/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
exact le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
namespace Submodule
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superseded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply RCLike.ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).2 this
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if every vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
K.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases K.exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← K.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero hwK]
instance [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map f.toLinearIsometry).HasOrthogonalProjection :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E).HasOrthogonalProjection := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u), K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ +
‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ := by
set p := K.orthogonalProjectionFn v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [K.orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq x]
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
K.orthogonalProjectionFn v = (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) :=
rfl
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjection v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - K.orthogonalProjection v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u : E) = u - K.orthogonalProjection u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (K.orthogonalProjection u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u =
⟨u - K.orthogonalProjection u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [U.HasOrthogonalProjection] (y : E) :
‖y - U.orthogonalProjection y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [U.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [K'.HasOrthogonalProjection]
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = (K'.orthogonalProjection u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : K.orthogonalProjection v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : K.orthogonalProjection v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker K.orthogonalProjection = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection]
(x : E) : f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f.toLinearMap).orthogonalProjection (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f).HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E) :
f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f).orthogonalProjection (f x) :=
have : (p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
((p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).orthogonalProjection x : E') =
f (p.orthogonalProjection (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E).orthogonalProjection = 0 := by ext
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖K.orthogonalProjection‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • ((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -map_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
rw [← smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w]
simp [hv]
end orthogonalProjection
section reflection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `reflection`: the reflection as a linear equivalence. -/
def reflectionLinearEquiv : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive
(2 • (K.subtype.comp K.orthogonalProjection.toLinearMap) - LinearMap.id) fun x => by
simp [two_smul]
/-- Reflection in a complete subspace of an inner product space. The word "reflection" is
sometimes understood to mean specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The definition here, of
reflection in a subspace, is a more general sense of the word that includes both those common
cases. -/
def reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ K.reflectionLinearEquiv with
norm_map' := by
intro x
let w : K := K.orthogonalProjection x
let v := x - w
have : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0 := orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x w w.2
convert norm_sub_eq_norm_add this using 2
· rw [LinearEquiv.coe_mk, reflectionLinearEquiv, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_ofInvolutive, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, two_smul,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
dsimp [v]
abel
· simp only [v, add_sub_cancel, eq_self_iff_true] }
variable {K}
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
theorem reflection_apply (p : E) : K.reflection p = 2 • (K.orthogonalProjection p : E) - p :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_symm : K.reflection.symm = K.reflection :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_inv : K.reflection⁻¹ = K.reflection :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_reflection (p : E) : K.reflection (K.reflection p) = p :=
K.reflection.left_inv p
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
theorem reflection_involutive : Function.Involutive K.reflection :=
K.reflection_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_trans_reflection :
K.reflection.trans K.reflection = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_involutive K
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_mul_reflection : K.reflection * K.reflection = 1 :=
reflection_trans_reflection _
theorem reflection_orthogonal_apply (v : E) : Kᗮ.reflection v = -K.reflection v := by
simp [reflection_apply]; abel
theorem reflection_orthogonal : Kᗮ.reflection = .trans K.reflection (.neg _) := by
ext; apply reflection_orthogonal_apply
variable {K}
theorem reflection_singleton_apply (u v : E) :
reflection (𝕜 ∙ u) v = 2 • (⟪u, v⟫ / ((‖u‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2)) • u - v := by
rw [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_singleton, ofReal_pow]
/-- A point is its own reflection if and only if it is in the subspace. -/
theorem reflection_eq_self_iff (x : E) : K.reflection x = x ↔ x ∈ K := by
rw [← orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, reflection_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← two_smul 𝕜,
two_smul ℕ, ← two_smul 𝕜]
refine (smul_right_injective E ?_).eq_iff
exact two_ne_zero
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self {x : E} (hx : x ∈ K) : K.reflection x = x :=
(reflection_eq_self_iff x).mpr hx
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x = f (K.reflection (f.symm x)) := by
simp [two_smul, reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_map_apply f K x]
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) = f.symm.trans (K.reflection.trans f) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_map_apply f K
/-- Reflection through the trivial subspace {0} is just negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_bot : reflection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg 𝕜 := by
ext; simp [reflection_apply]
end reflection
end Submodule
section Orthogonal
namespace Submodule
/-- If `K₁` is complete and contained in `K₂`, `K₁` and `K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂` span `K₂`. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace {K₁ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂)
[K₁.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K₁ ⊔ K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ = K₂ := by
ext x
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
let v : K₁ := orthogonalProjection K₁ x
have hvm : x - v ∈ K₁ᗮ := sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact K₂.add_mem (h hy) hz.2
· exact fun hx => ⟨v, v.prop, x - v, ⟨hvm, K₂.sub_mem hx (h v.prop)⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable {K} in
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` span the whole space. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := by
convert Submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) using 2
simp
/-- If `K` is complete, any `v` in `E` can be expressed as a sum of elements of `K` and `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (v : E) :
∃ y ∈ K, ∃ z ∈ Kᗮ, v = y + z :=
⟨K.orthogonalProjection v, Subtype.coe_prop _, v - K.orthogonalProjection v,
sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _, by simp⟩
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, then the orthogonal complement of its orthogonal
complement is itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮᗮ = K := by
ext v
constructor
· obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := K.exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal v
intro hv
have hz' : z = 0 := by
have hyz : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0 := by simp [hz y hy, inner_eq_zero_symm]
simpa [inner_add_right, hyz] using hv z hz
simp [hy, hz']
· intro hv w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact hw v hv
/-- In a Hilbert space, the orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement of a subspace `K`
is the topological closure of `K`.
Note that the completeness assumption is necessary. Let `E` be the space `ℕ →₀ ℝ` with inner space
structure inherited from `PiLp 2 (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℝ)`. Let `K` be the subspace of sequences with the sum
of all elements equal to zero. Then `Kᗮ = ⊥`, `Kᗮᗮ = ⊤`. -/
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure [CompleteSpace E] :
Kᗮᗮ = K.topologicalClosure := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· convert Submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_monotone K.le_topologicalClosure using 1
rw [K.topologicalClosure.orthogonal_orthogonal]
· exact K.topologicalClosure_minimal K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal Kᗮ.isClosed_orthogonal
variable {K}
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, `K` and `Kᗮ` are complements of each other. -/
theorem isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : IsCompl K Kᗮ :=
⟨K.orthogonal_disjoint, codisjoint_iff.2 Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace⟩
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalComplement_eq_orthogonalComplement {L : Submodule 𝕜 E} [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
[L.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ = Lᗮ ↔ K = L :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using congr(Submodule.orthogonal $(h)),
fun h ↦ congr(Submodule.orthogonal $(h))⟩
@[simp]
theorem orthogonal_eq_bot_iff [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ = ⊥ ↔ K = ⊤ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => by rw [h, Submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot]⟩
intro h
have : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace
rwa [h, sup_comm, bot_sup_eq] at this
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `K` of an element of `Kᗮ` is zero. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{v : E} (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : K.orthogonalProjection v = 0 := by
ext
convert eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal (K := K) _ _ <;> simp [hv]
/-- The projection into `U` from an orthogonal submodule `V` is the zero map. -/
theorem IsOrtho.orthogonalProjection_comp_subtypeL {U V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[U.HasOrthogonalProjection] (h : U ⟂ V) : U.orthogonalProjection ∘L V.subtypeL = 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext fun v =>
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero <| h.symm v.prop
/-- The projection into `U` from `V` is the zero map if and only if `U` and `V` are orthogonal. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_comp_subtypeL_eq_zero_iff {U V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[U.HasOrthogonalProjection] : U.orthogonalProjection ∘L V.subtypeL = 0 ↔ U ⟂ V :=
⟨fun h u hu v hv => by
convert orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero v u hu using 2
have : U.orthogonalProjection v = 0 := DFunLike.congr_fun h (⟨_, hv⟩ : V)
rw [this, Submodule.coe_zero, sub_zero], Submodule.IsOrtho.orthogonalProjection_comp_subtypeL⟩
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_linear_proj [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E) :
K.orthogonalProjection x =
K.linearProjOfIsCompl _ Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace x := by
have : IsCompl K Kᗮ := Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace
conv_lhs => rw [← Submodule.linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self this x]
rw [map_add, orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self,
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero (Submodule.coe_mem _), add_zero]
theorem orthogonalProjection_coe_linearMap_eq_linearProj [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
(K.orthogonalProjection : E →ₗ[𝕜] K) =
K.linearProjOfIsCompl _ Submodule.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace :=
LinearMap.ext <| orthogonalProjection_eq_linear_proj
/-- The reflection in `K` of an element of `Kᗮ` is its negation. -/
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_neg [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] {v : E}
(hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : K.reflection v = -v := by
simp [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero hv]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `Kᗮ` of an element of `K` is zero. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_zero
[Kᗮ.HasOrthogonalProjection] {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) : Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection v = 0 :=
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero (K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hv)
/-- If `U ≤ V`, then projecting on `V` and then on `U` is the same as projecting on `U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonalProjection_of_le {U V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
[U.HasOrthogonalProjection] [V.HasOrthogonalProjection] (h : U ≤ V) (x : E) :
U.orthogonalProjection (V.orthogonalProjection x) = U.orthogonalProjection x :=
Eq.symm <| by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, map_sub] using
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero
(Submodule.orthogonal_le h (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal x))
/-- Given a monotone family `U` of complete submodules of `E` and a fixed `x : E`,
the orthogonal projection of `x` on `U i` tends to the orthogonal projection of `x` on
`(⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure` along `atTop`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_tendsto_closure_iSup {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
(U : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E) [∀ i, (U i).HasOrthogonalProjection]
[(⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.HasOrthogonalProjection] (hU : Monotone U) (x : E) :
Filter.Tendsto (fun i => ((U i).orthogonalProjection x : E)) atTop
(𝓝 ((⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.orthogonalProjection x : E)) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp h
let y := ((⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.orthogonalProjection x : E)
have proj_x : ∀ i, (U i).orthogonalProjection x = (U i).orthogonalProjection y := fun i =>
(orthogonalProjection_orthogonalProjection_of_le
((le_iSup U i).trans (iSup U).le_topologicalClosure) _).symm
suffices ∀ ε > 0, ∃ I, ∀ i ≥ I, ‖((U i).orthogonalProjection y : E) - y‖ < ε by
simpa only [proj_x, NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_atTop] using this
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨a, ha, hay⟩ : ∃ a ∈ ⨆ i, U i, dist y a < ε := by
have y_mem : y ∈ (⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure := Submodule.coe_mem _
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe, Metric.mem_closure_iff] at y_mem
exact y_mem ε hε
rw [dist_eq_norm] at hay
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ : ∃ I, a ∈ U I := by rwa [Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed _ hU.directed_le] at ha
refine ⟨I, fun i (hi : I ≤ i) => ?_⟩
rw [norm_sub_rev, orthogonalProjection_minimal]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hay
change _ ≤ ‖y - (⟨a, hU hi hI⟩ : U i)‖
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.mpr fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩ _
/-- Given a monotone family `U` of complete submodules of `E` with dense span supremum,
and a fixed `x : E`, the orthogonal projection of `x` on `U i` tends to `x` along `at_top`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_tendsto_self {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
(U : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E) [∀ t, (U t).HasOrthogonalProjection] (hU : Monotone U) (x : E)
(hU' : ⊤ ≤ (⨆ t, U t).topologicalClosure) :
Filter.Tendsto (fun t => ((U t).orthogonalProjection x : E)) atTop (𝓝 x) := by
have : (⨆ i, U i).topologicalClosure.HasOrthogonalProjection := by
rw [top_unique hU']
infer_instance
convert orthogonalProjection_tendsto_closure_iSup U hU x
rw [eq_comm, orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, top_unique hU']
trivial
/-- The orthogonal complement satisfies `Kᗮᗮᗮ = Kᗮ`. -/
theorem triorthogonal_eq_orthogonal [CompleteSpace E] : Kᗮᗮᗮ = Kᗮ := by
rw [Kᗮ.orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure]
exact K.isClosed_orthogonal.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq
/-- The closure of `K` is the full space iff `Kᗮ` is trivial. -/
theorem topologicalClosure_eq_top_iff [CompleteSpace E] :
K.topologicalClosure = ⊤ ↔ Kᗮ = ⊥ := by
rw [← K.orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← Submodule.triorthogonal_eq_orthogonal, h, Submodule.top_orthogonal_eq_bot]
· rw [h, Submodule.bot_orthogonal_eq_top]
end Submodule
namespace Dense
/- TODO: Move to another file? -/
open Submodule
variable {K} {x y : E}
theorem eq_zero_of_inner_left (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪x, v⟫ = 0) : x = 0 := by
have : (⟪x, ·⟫) = 0 := (continuous_const.inner continuous_id).ext_on
hK continuous_const (Subtype.forall.1 h)
simpa using congr_fun this x
theorem eq_zero_of_mem_orthogonal (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : x ∈ Kᗮ) : x = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_inner_left hK fun v ↦ (mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 h _ v.2
/-- If `S` is dense and `x - y ∈ Kᗮ`, then `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_sub_mem_orthogonal (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : x - y ∈ Kᗮ) : x = y :=
sub_eq_zero.1 <| eq_zero_of_mem_orthogonal hK h
theorem eq_of_inner_left (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y :=
hK.eq_of_sub_mem_orthogonal (Submodule.sub_mem_orthogonal_of_inner_left h)
theorem eq_of_inner_right (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪(v : E), x⟫ = ⟪(v : E), y⟫) :
x = y :=
hK.eq_of_sub_mem_orthogonal (Submodule.sub_mem_orthogonal_of_inner_right h)
theorem eq_zero_of_inner_right (hK : Dense (K : Set E)) (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪(v : E), x⟫ = 0) : x = 0 :=
hK.eq_of_inner_right fun v => by rw [inner_zero_right, h v]
end Dense
namespace Submodule
variable {K}
/-- The reflection in `Kᗮ` of an element of `K` is its negation. -/
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_neg [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] {v : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) : Kᗮ.reflection v = -v :=
reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_neg (K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hv)
/-- The orthogonal projection onto `(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ` of `v` is zero. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_zero (v : E) :
(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ.orthogonalProjection v = 0 :=
orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_zero
(Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self v)
/-- The reflection in `(𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ` of `v` is `-v`. -/
theorem reflection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_neg (v : E) : reflection (𝕜 ∙ v)ᗮ v = -v :=
reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonal_precomplement_eq_neg (Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self v)
theorem reflection_sub {v w : F} (h : ‖v‖ = ‖w‖) : reflection (ℝ ∙ (v - w))ᗮ v = w := by
set R : F ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F := reflection (ℝ ∙ v - w)ᗮ
suffices R v + R v = w + w by
apply smul_right_injective F (by norm_num : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0)
simpa [two_smul] using this
have h₁ : R (v - w) = -(v - w) := reflection_orthogonalComplement_singleton_eq_neg (v - w)
have h₂ : R (v + w) = v + w := by
apply reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self
rw [Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
rw [real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff]
exact h
convert congr_arg₂ (· + ·) h₂ h₁ using 1
· simp
· abel
variable (K)
section FiniteDimensional
open Module
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 K]
@[simp]
theorem det_reflection : LinearMap.det K.reflection.toLinearMap = (-1) ^ finrank 𝕜 Kᗮ := by
by_cases hK : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 Kᗮ
swap
· rw [finrank_of_infinite_dimensional hK, pow_zero, LinearMap.det_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_zero]
exact finrank_of_infinite_dimensional fun h ↦ hK (h.finiteDimensional_submodule _)
let e := K.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ K.isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace
let b := (finBasis 𝕜 K).prod (finBasis 𝕜 Kᗮ)
have : LinearMap.toMatrix b b (e.symm ∘ₗ K.reflection.toLinearMap ∘ₗ e.symm.symm) =
Matrix.fromBlocks 1 0 0 (-1) := by
ext (_ | _) (_ | _) <;>
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, b, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, e, eq_comm,
reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self, reflection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_neg]
rw [← LinearMap.det_conj _ e.symm, ← LinearMap.det_toMatrix b, this, Matrix.det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁,
Matrix.det_one, one_mul, Matrix.det_neg, Fintype.card_fin, Matrix.det_one, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_reflection : K.reflection.det = (-1) ^ finrank 𝕜 Kᗮ := by
ext
rw [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
exact K.det_reflection
end FiniteDimensional
/-- If the orthogonal projection to `K` is well-defined, then a vector splits as the sum of its
orthogonal projections onto a complete submodule `K` and onto the orthogonal complement of `K`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
(w : E) : (K.orthogonalProjection w : E) + (Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection w : E) = w := by
simp
/-- The Pythagorean theorem, for an orthogonal projection. -/
theorem norm_sq_eq_add_norm_sq_projection (x : E) (S : Submodule 𝕜 E) [S.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
‖x‖ ^ 2 = ‖S.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 + ‖Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖x‖ ^ 2 = ‖(S.orthogonalProjection x : E) + Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal]
_ = ‖S.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 + ‖Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]
exact norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero _ _ <|
(S.mem_orthogonal _).1 (Sᗮ.orthogonalProjection x).2 _ (S.orthogonalProjection x).2
/-- In a complete space `E`, the projection maps onto a complete subspace `K` and its orthogonal
complement sum to the identity. -/
theorem id_eq_sum_orthogonalProjection_self_orthogonalComplement [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E =
K.subtypeL.comp K.orthogonalProjection + Kᗮ.subtypeL.comp Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection := by
ext w
exact (K.orthogonalProjection_add_orthogonalProjection_orthogonal w).symm
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `Submodule.coe_inner`.
@[simp high]
theorem inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_right [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (u : K) (v : E) :
⟪K.orthogonalProjection v, u⟫ = ⟪v, u⟫ :=
calc
⟪K.orthogonalProjection v, u⟫ = ⟪(K.orthogonalProjection v : E), u⟫ := K.coe_inner _ _
_ = ⟪(K.orthogonalProjection v : E), u⟫ + ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjection v, u⟫ := by
rw [orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ (Submodule.coe_mem _), add_zero]
_ = ⟪v, u⟫ := by rw [← inner_add_left, add_sub_cancel]
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `Submodule.coe_inner`.
@[simp high]
theorem inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_left [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (u : K) (v : E) :
⟪u, K.orthogonalProjection v⟫ = ⟪(u : E), v⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, ← inner_conj_symm (u : E), inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_right]
| /-- The orthogonal projection is self-adjoint. -/
theorem inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (u v : E) :
⟪↑(K.orthogonalProjection u), v⟫ = ⟪u, K.orthogonalProjection v⟫ := by
rw [← inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_left, inner_orthogonalProjection_eq_of_mem_right]
/-- The orthogonal projection is symmetric. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_isSymmetric [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
(K.subtypeL ∘L K.orthogonalProjection : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric :=
inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right K
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 1,058 | 1,066 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# Measurability of the integral against a kernel
The Bochner integral of a strongly measurable function against a kernel is strongly measurable.
## Main statements
* `MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right`: the function
`a ↦ ∫ b, f a b ∂(κ a)` is measurable, for an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function
`f : α → β → E` such that `uncurry f` is measurable.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Function Set Filter
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{κ : Kernel α β} {η : Kernel β γ} {a : α} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_integrable ⦃f : β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | Integrable f (κ a)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt hf.enorm.lintegral_kernel measurable_const
variable [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : Kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_kernel_integrable ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) :
MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_kernel_prod_right hf.enorm) measurable_const
open ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
omit [IsSFiniteKernel κ] in
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel ⦃f : β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
have : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc β E := SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let f' n : α → E := {x | Integrable f (κ x)}.indicator fun x ↦ (s n).integral (κ x)
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto (f := f') atTop (fun n ↦ ?_) ?_
· refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun _ _ ↦ ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
exact κ.measurable_coe ((s n).measurableSet_fiber _)
· rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable f (κ x)
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hfx, indicator_of_mem, f']
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset _ hfx
exact subset_rfl
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prodMk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n =>
{x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral (κ x)
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_kernel_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply Kernel.measurable_kernel_prodMk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂κ x) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) (κ x)
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) (κ x) := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was
-- exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
-- SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le hf.measurable (by simp) (x, y) n
· refine Eventually.of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf.measurable (by simp) ?_
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂κ x := by
rw [← uncurry_curry f] at hf
exact hf.integral_kernel_prod_right
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right'' {f : β × γ → E}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun x => ∫ y, (fun u : (α × β) × γ => f (u.1.2, u.2)) (x, y) ∂η x) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.snd.prodMk measurable_snd))
simpa using this
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left ⦃f : β → α → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f x y ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' ⦃f : β × α → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left'' {f : γ × β → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂η (a, y) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun y => ∫ x, (fun u : γ × α × β => f (u.1, u.2.2)) (x, y) ∂η y) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_snd.snd))
simpa using this
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/MeasurableIntegral.lean | 316 | 319 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.