Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
|
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 204 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity.WalkCounting
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
/-!
# Adjacency Matrices
This module defines the adjacency matrix of a graph, and provides theorems connecting graph
properties to computational properties of the matrix.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix`: `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`.
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.to_graph`: for `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : A.IsAdjMatrix`,
`h.to_graph` is the simple graph induced by `A`.
* `Matrix.compl`: for `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be
the adjacency matrix of the complement graph of the graph induced by `A`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix`: the adjacency matrix of a `SimpleGraph`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk`: each entry of the `n`th power of
a graph's adjacency matrix counts the number of length-`n` walks between the corresponding
pair of vertices.
-/
open Matrix
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph
variable {V α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
/-- `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`. -/
structure IsAdjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] (A : Matrix V V α) : Prop where
zero_or_one : ∀ i j, A i j = 0 ∨ A i j = 1 := by aesop
symm : A.IsSymm := by aesop
apply_diag : ∀ i, A i i = 0 := by aesop
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A : Matrix V V α}
@[simp]
theorem apply_diag_ne [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i : V) :
¬A i i = 1 := by simp [h.apply_diag i]
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_one_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 1 ↔ A i j = 0 := by obtain h | h := h.zero_or_one i j <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_zero_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 0 ↔ A i j = 1 := by rw [← apply_ne_one_iff h, Classical.not_not]
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : IsAdjMatrix A`,
`h.toGraph` is the simple graph whose adjacency matrix is `A`. -/
@[simps]
def toGraph [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj i j := A i j = 1
symm i j hij := by simp only; rwa [h.symm.apply i j]
loopless i := by simp [h]
instance [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
DecidableRel h.toGraph.Adj := by
simp only [toGraph]
infer_instance
end IsAdjMatrix
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be the adjacency matrix of
the complement graph of the graph induced by `A.adjMatrix`. -/
def compl [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α) : Matrix V V α :=
fun i j => ite (i = j) 0 (ite (A i j = 0) 1 0)
section Compl
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α)
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply_diag [Zero α] [One α] (i : V) : A.compl i i = 0 := by simp [compl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply [Zero α] [One α] (i j : V) : A.compl i j = 0 ∨ A.compl i j = 1 := by
unfold compl
split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : A.compl.IsSymm := by
ext
simp [compl, h.apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
{ symm := by simp [h] }
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
isAdjMatrix_compl A h.symm
theorem toGraph_compl_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
h.compl.toGraph = h.toGraphᶜ := by
ext v w
rcases h.zero_or_one v w with h | h <;> by_cases hvw : v = w <;> simp [Matrix.compl, h, hvw]
end IsAdjMatrix
end Compl
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
variable (α) in
/-- `adjMatrix G α` is the matrix `A` such that `A i j = (1 : α)` if `i` and `j` are
adjacent in the simple graph `G`, and otherwise `A i j = 0`. -/
def adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : Matrix V V α :=
of fun i j => if G.Adj i j then (1 : α) else 0
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `adjMatrix`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_apply (v w : V) [Zero α] [One α] :
G.adjMatrix α v w = if G.Adj v w then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem transpose_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α)ᵀ = G.adjMatrix α := by
ext
simp [adj_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsSymm :=
transpose_adjMatrix G
variable (α)
/-- The adjacency matrix of `G` is an adjacency matrix. -/
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsAdjMatrix :=
{ zero_or_one := fun i j => by by_cases h : G.Adj i j <;> simp [h] }
/-- The graph induced by the adjacency matrix of `G` is `G` itself. -/
theorem toGraph_adjMatrix_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] :
(G.isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix α).toGraph = G := by
ext
simp only [IsAdjMatrix.toGraph_adj, adjMatrix_apply, ite_eq_left_iff, zero_ne_one]
apply Classical.not_not
variable {α}
/-- The sum of the identity, the adjacency matrix, and its complement is the all-ones matrix. -/
theorem one_add_adjMatrix_add_compl_adjMatrix_eq_allOnes [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq α]
[AddMonoidWithOne α] : 1 + G.adjMatrix α + (G.adjMatrix α).compl = Matrix.of fun _ _ ↦ 1 := by
ext i j
unfold Matrix.compl
rw [of_apply, add_apply, adjMatrix_apply, add_apply, adjMatrix_apply, one_apply]
by_cases h : G.Adj i j
· aesop
· split_ifs <;> simp_all
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_dotProduct [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct (G.adjMatrix α v) vec = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_adjMatrix [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct vec (G.adjMatrix α v) = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter, Finset.sum_apply]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ vec) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
rw [mulVec, adjMatrix_dotProduct]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_vecMul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(vec ᵥ* G.adjMatrix α) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp only [← dotProduct_adjMatrix, vecMul]
refine congr rfl ?_; ext x
rw [← transpose_apply (adjMatrix α G) x v, transpose_adjMatrix]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix V V α) (v w : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α * M) v w = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, M u w := by
simp [mul_apply, neighborFinset_eq_filter, sum_filter]
@[simp]
theorem mul_adjMatrix_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix V V α) (v w : V) :
(M * G.adjMatrix α) v w = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset w, M v u := by
simp [mul_apply, neighborFinset_eq_filter, sum_filter, adj_comm]
variable (α) in
@[simp]
theorem trace_adjMatrix [AddCommMonoid α] [One α] : Matrix.trace (G.adjMatrix α) = 0 := by
simp [Matrix.trace]
theorem adjMatrix_mul_self_apply_self [NonAssocSemiring α] (i : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α * G.adjMatrix α) i i = degree G i := by simp [filter_true_of_mem]
variable {G}
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_const_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] {a : α} {v : V} :
(G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ Function.const _ a) v = G.degree v * a := by simp
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_const_apply_of_regular [NonAssocSemiring α] {d : ℕ} {a : α}
(hd : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) {v : V} : (G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ Function.const _ a) v = d * a := by
simp [hd v]
theorem adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk [DecidableEq V] [Semiring α] (n : ℕ) (u v : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α ^ n) u v = Fintype.card { p : G.Walk u v | p.length = n } := by
rw [card_set_walk_length_eq]
induction n generalizing u v with
| zero => obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne u v <;> simp [finsetWalkLength, *]
| succ n ih =>
simp only [pow_succ', finsetWalkLength, ih, adjMatrix_mul_apply]
rw [Finset.card_biUnion]
· norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_sum, card_map, neighborFinset_def]
apply Finset.sum_toFinset_eq_subtype
-- Disjointness for card_bUnion
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ - ⟨y, hy⟩ - hxy
rw [Function.onFun, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
intro p hp
| simp only [inf_eq_inter, mem_inter, mem_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, exists_prop] at hp
obtain ⟨⟨px, _, rfl⟩, ⟨py, hpy, hp⟩⟩ := hp
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/AdjMatrix.lean | 251 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 1,126 | 1,128 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
| generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 82 | 84 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `IsCauSeq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
* `CauSeq`: the type of Cauchy sequences valued in type `β` with respect to an absolute value
function `abv`.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing Module
variable {α β : Type*}
open IsAbsoluteValue
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
(abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ →
abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma {ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ → abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ →
abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε := by
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _)
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0
refine ⟨_, εK, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _))
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _))
set M := max 1 (max K₁ K₂)
have : abv (a₁ - b₁) * abv b₂ + abv (a₂ - b₂) * abv a₁ < ε / 2 / M * M + ε / 2 / M * M := by
gcongr
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b → abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε := by
refine ⟨K * ε * K, mul_pos (mul_pos K0 ε0) K0, fun {a b} ha hb h => ?_⟩
have a0 := K0.trans_le ha
have b0 := K0.trans_le hb
rw [inv_sub_inv' ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0), abv_mul abv, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv,
abv_inv abv, abv_sub abv]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ b0.le) a0.le
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ b0.ne', ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ a0.ne', one_mul]
refine h.trans_le ?_
gcongr
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsCauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :
Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace IsCauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] {f g : ℕ → β}
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
--@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := by
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij k ik => ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) ?_)
rw [abv_sub abv]; exact hi _ ik
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0
⟨i, fun _ ij _ jk => H _ (le_trans ij jk) _ ij⟩
lemma bounded (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := by
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hf _ zero_lt_one
set R : ℕ → α := @Nat.rec (fun _ => α) (abv (f 0)) fun i c => max c (abv (f i.succ)) with hR
have : ∀ i, ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R i := by
refine Nat.rec (by simp [hR]) ?_
rintro i hi j (rfl | hj)
· simp [R]
· exact (hi j hj).trans (le_max_left _ _)
refine ⟨R i + 1, fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain hji | hij := le_total j i
· exact (this i _ hji).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
· simpa using (abv_add abv _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this i _ le_rfl) (h _ hij)
lemma bounded' (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := hf.bounded
⟨max r (x + 1), (lt_add_one x).trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
fun i ↦ (h i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩
lemma const (x : β) : IsCauSeq abv fun _ ↦ x :=
fun ε ε0 ↦ ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero] using ε0⟩
theorem add (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f + g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
lemma mul (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f * g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, _, hF⟩ := hf.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, _, hG⟩ := hg.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun j ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
@[simp] lemma _root_.isCauSeq_neg : IsCauSeq abv (-f) ↔ IsCauSeq abv f := by
simp only [IsCauSeq, Pi.neg_apply, ← neg_sub', abv_neg]
protected alias ⟨of_neg, neg⟩ := isCauSeq_neg
end IsCauSeq
/-- `CauSeq β abv` is the type of `β`-valued Cauchy sequences, with respect to the absolute value
function `abv`. -/
def CauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(β : Type*) [Ring β] (abv : β → α) : Type _ :=
{ f : ℕ → β // IsCauSeq abv f }
namespace CauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
section Ring
variable [Ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : CoeFun (CauSeq β abv) fun _ => ℕ → β :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g := Subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem isCauSeq (f : CauSeq β abv) : IsCauSeq abv f :=
f.2
theorem cauchy (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∀ {ε}, 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := @f.2
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f`, create a Cauchy sequence from a sequence `g` with
the same values as `f`. -/
def ofEq (f : CauSeq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨g, fun ε => by rw [show g = f from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} :
0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} : 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded
theorem bounded' (f : CauSeq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded' x
instance : Add (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f + g) = (f : ℕ → β) + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem add_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i :=
rfl
variable (abv) in
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : CauSeq β abv := ⟨fun _ ↦ x, IsCauSeq.const _⟩
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abv
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_const (x : β) : (const x : ℕ → β) = Function.const ℕ x :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x :=
rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : CauSeq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => congr_arg (fun f : CauSeq β abv => (f : ℕ → β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : Zero (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : CauSeq β abv) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CauSeq β abv) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : CauSeq β abv) i = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : CauSeq β abv) i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_zero : const 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_one : const 1 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
rfl
instance : Mul (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f g ↦ ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f * g) = (f : ℕ → β) * g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i :=
rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
rfl
instance : Neg (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f ↦ ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem neg_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i :=
rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
rfl
instance : Sub (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ofEq (f + -g) (fun x => f x - g x) fun i => by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f - g) = (f : ℕ → β) - g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i :=
rfl
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β]
instance : SMul G (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f => (ofEq (const (a • (1 : β)) * f) (a • (f : ℕ → β))) fun _ => smul_one_mul _ _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(a • f) = a • (f : ℕ → β) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem smul_apply (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (a • f) i = a • f i :=
rfl
theorem const_smul (a : G) (x : β) : const (a • x) = a • const x :=
rfl
instance : IsScalarTower G (CauSeq β abv) (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f g => Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc a (f : ℕ → β) (g : ℕ → β)⟩
end SMul
instance addGroup : AddGroup (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instNatCast : NatCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroupWithOne Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl
coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
instance : Pow (CauSeq β abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n =>
(ofEq (npowRec n f) fun i => f i ^ n) <| by induction n <;> simp [*, npowRec, pow_succ]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (f : CauSeq β abv) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (f : ℕ → β) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pow_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (n i : ℕ) : (f ^ n) i = f i ^ n :=
rfl
theorem const_pow (x : β) (n : ℕ) : const (x ^ n) = const x ^ n :=
rfl
instance ring : Ring (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.ring Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl coe_add coe_mul coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) coe_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] : CommRing (CauSeq β abv) :=
{ CauSeq.ring with
mul_comm := fun a b => ext fun n => by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm] }
/-- `LimZero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def LimZero {abv : β → α} (f : CauSeq β abv) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f + g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ <| half_pos ε0) (hg _ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_limZero_right (f : CauSeq β abv) {g} (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 F0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt <| hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem mul_limZero_left {f} (g : CauSeq β abv) (hg : LimZero f) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 G0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _)
rwa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem neg_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) : LimZero (-f) := by
rw [← neg_one_mul f]
exact mul_limZero_right _ hf
theorem sub_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f - g) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_limZero hf (neg_limZero hg)
theorem limZero_sub_rev {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hfg : LimZero (f - g)) : LimZero (g - f) := by
simpa using neg_limZero hfg
theorem zero_limZero : LimZero (0 : CauSeq β abv)
| ε, ε0 => ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_limZero {x : β} : LimZero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun H =>
(abv_eq_zero abv).1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _)) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, hi⟩ := H _ ε0
le_of_lt <| hi _ le_rfl,
fun e => e.symm ▸ zero_limZero⟩
instance equiv : Setoid (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => LimZero (f - g),
⟨fun f => by simp [zero_limZero],
fun f ε hε => by simpa using neg_limZero f ε hε,
fun fg gh => by simpa using add_limZero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem add_equiv_add {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 + g1 ≈ f2 + g2 := by simpa only [← add_sub_add_comm] using add_limZero hf hg
theorem neg_equiv_neg {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f ≈ g) : -f ≈ -g := by
simpa only [neg_sub'] using neg_limZero hf
theorem sub_equiv_sub {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 - g1 ≈ f2 - g2 := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_equiv_add hf (neg_equiv_neg hg)
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ <| half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij k jk => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk))
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem limZero_congr {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : LimZero f ↔ LimZero g :=
⟨fun l => by simpa using add_limZero (Setoid.symm h) l, fun l => by simpa using add_limZero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
by_contra nk
refine hf fun ε ε0 => ?_
simp? [not_forall] at nk says
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ge_iff_le, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp,
not_le] at nk
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0)
rcases nk _ (half_pos ε0) i with ⟨j, ij, hj⟩
refine ⟨j, fun k jk => ?_⟩
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi j ij k jk) hj)
rwa [sub_add_cancel, add_halves] at this
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → β) (g : CauSeq β abv) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - g j) < ε) :
IsCauSeq abv f
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (h _ (half_pos <| half_pos ε0)) (g.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)
⟨i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl; rw [abv_sub abv] at h₁
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij).1 h₁)
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add this (h₂ _ ij))
rwa [add_halves, add_halves, add_right_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this⟩
theorem not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ¬LimZero f := by
intro h
have : LimZero (f - 0) := by simp [h]
exact hf this
theorem mul_equiv_zero (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : g * f ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (g * f) := mul_limZero_right _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (g * f - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_equiv_zero' (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : f * g ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (f * g) := mul_limZero_left _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (f * g - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_not_equiv_zero {f g : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : ¬f * g ≈ 0 :=
fun (this : LimZero (f * g - 0)) => by
have hlz : LimZero (f * g) := by simpa
have hf' : ¬LimZero f := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (f - 0) from hf
have hg' : ¬LimZero g := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (g - 0) from hg
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf' with ⟨a1, ha1, N1, hN1⟩
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hg' with ⟨a2, ha2, N2, hN2⟩
have : 0 < a1 * a2 := mul_pos ha1 ha2
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hlz _ this
let i := max N (max N1 N2)
have hN' := hN i (le_max_left _ _)
have hN1' := hN1 i (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
have hN1' := hN2 i (le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
apply not_le_of_lt hN'
change _ ≤ abv (_ * _)
rw [abv_mul abv]
gcongr
theorem const_equiv {x y : β} : const x ≈ const y ↔ x = y :=
show LimZero _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_limZero, sub_eq_zero]
theorem mul_equiv_mul {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 * g1 ≈ f2 * g2 := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
using add_limZero (mul_limZero_left g1 hf) (mul_limZero_right f2 hg)
theorem smul_equiv_smul {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β] {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (c : G)
(hf : f1 ≈ f2) : c • f1 ≈ c • f2 := by
simpa [const_smul, smul_one_mul _ _] using
mul_equiv_mul (const_equiv.mpr <| Eq.refl <| c • (1 : β)) hf
theorem pow_equiv_pow {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (n : ℕ) : f1 ^ n ≈ f2 ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, Setoid.refl]
| succ n ih => simpa only [pow_succ'] using mul_equiv_mul hf ih
end Ring
section IsDomain
variable [Ring β] [IsDomain β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem one_not_equiv_zero : ¬const abv 1 ≈ const abv 0 := fun h =>
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ k, i ≤ k → abv (1 - 0) < ε := h
have h1 : abv 1 ≤ 0 :=
le_of_not_gt fun h2 : 0 < abv 1 =>
(Exists.elim (this _ h2)) fun i hi => lt_irrefl (abv 1) <| by simpa using hi _ le_rfl
have h2 : 0 ≤ abv 1 := abv_nonneg abv _
have : abv 1 = 0 := le_antisymm h1 h2
have : (1 : β) = 0 := (abv_eq_zero abv).mp this
absurd this one_ne_zero
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem inv_aux {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((f j)⁻¹ - (f i)⁻¹) < ε
| _, ε0 =>
let ⟨_, K0, HK⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abv ε0 K0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and HK (f.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨iK, H'⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H _ ij).1 iK (H' _ ij)⟩
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f` with nonzero limit, create a Cauchy sequence with values equal to
the inverses of the values of `f`. -/
def inv (f : CauSeq β abv) (hf : ¬LimZero f) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨_, inv_aux hf⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : ⇑(inv f hf) = (f : ℕ → β)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem inv_apply {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf i) : inv f hf i = (f i)⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem inv_mul_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : inv f hf * f ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : f * inv f hf ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_inv {x : β} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
const abv x⁻¹ = inv (const abv x) (by rwa [const_limZero]) :=
rfl
end DivisionRing
section Abs
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abs
/-- The entries of a positive Cauchy sequence eventually have a positive lower bound. -/
def Pos (f : CauSeq α abs) : Prop :=
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ f j
theorem not_limZero_of_pos {f : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → ¬LimZero f
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ F0)
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ le_rfl
not_lt_of_le h₁ (abs_lt.1 h₂).2
theorem const_pos {x : α} : Pos (const x) ↔ 0 < x :=
⟨fun ⟨_, K0, _, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (h _ le_rfl), fun h => ⟨x, h, 0, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
theorem add_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, _root_.add_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
add_le_add h₁ h₂⟩
theorem pos_add_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → LimZero g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ (half_pos F0))
⟨_, half_pos F0, i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h j ij
have := add_le_add h₁ (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 h₂).1)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two] at this⟩
protected theorem mul_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f * g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, mul_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
mul_le_mul h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt G0) (le_trans (le_of_lt F0) h₁)⟩
theorem trichotomy (f : CauSeq α abs) : Pos f ∨ LimZero f ∨ Pos (-f) := by
rcases Classical.em (LimZero f) with h | h <;> simp [*]
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero h with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
rcases exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ K0) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine (le_total 0 (f i)).imp ?_ ?_ <;>
refine fun h => ⟨K, K0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩ <;>
have := (hi _ ij).1 <;>
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl
· rwa [abs_of_nonneg] at this
rw [abs_of_nonneg h] at h₁
exact
(le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).1
(le_trans h₁ <| neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).1)
· rwa [abs_of_nonpos] at this
rw [abs_of_nonpos h] at h₁
rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right, zero_sub]
exact le_trans (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).2) h₁
instance : LT (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => Pos (g - f)⟩
instance : LE (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => f < g ∨ f ≈ g⟩
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g ≈ h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert pos_add_limZero fg (neg_limZero gh) using 1
simp
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≈ g) (gh : g < h) : f < h := by
have := pos_add_limZero gh (neg_limZero fg)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] at this
theorem lt_trans {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert add_pos fg gh using 1
simp
theorem lt_irrefl {f : CauSeq α abs} : ¬f < f
| h => not_limZero_of_pos h (by simp [zero_limZero])
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≈ g) (hgh : g ≤ h) : f ≤ h :=
hgh.elim (Or.inl ∘ CauSeq.lt_of_eq_of_lt hfg) (Or.inr ∘ Setoid.trans hfg)
theorem le_of_le_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≤ g) (hgh : g ≈ h) : f ≤ h :=
hfg.elim (fun h => Or.inl (CauSeq.lt_of_lt_of_eq h hgh)) fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.trans h hgh)
instance : Preorder (CauSeq α abs) where
lt := (· < ·)
le f g := f < g ∨ f ≈ g
le_refl _ := Or.inr (Setoid.refl _)
le_trans _ _ _ fg gh :=
match fg, gh with
| Or.inl fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_trans fg gh
| Or.inl fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_lt_of_eq fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_eq_of_lt fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inr <| Setoid.trans fg gh
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Or.inl h, not_or_intro (mt (lt_trans h) lt_irrefl) (not_limZero_of_pos h)⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₁.resolve_right (mt (fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.symm h)) h₂)⟩
theorem le_antisymm {f g : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≤ g) (gf : g ≤ f) : f ≈ g :=
fg.resolve_left (not_lt_of_le gf)
theorem lt_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f < g ∨ f ≈ g ∨ g < f :=
(trichotomy (g - f)).imp_right fun h =>
h.imp (fun h => Setoid.symm h) fun h => by rwa [neg_sub] at h
theorem le_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f ≤ g ∨ g ≤ f :=
(or_assoc.2 (lt_total f g)).imp_right Or.inl
theorem const_lt {x y : α} : const x < const y ↔ x < y :=
show Pos _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_pos, sub_pos]
theorem const_le {x y : α} : const x ≤ const y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq]; exact or_congr const_lt const_equiv
theorem le_of_exists {f g : CauSeq α abs} (h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, f j ≤ g j) : f ≤ g :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
(or_assoc.2 (CauSeq.lt_total f g)).elim id fun hgf =>
False.elim
(let ⟨_, hK0, j, hKj⟩ := hgf
not_lt_of_ge (hi (max i j) (le_max_left _ _))
(sub_pos.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hK0 (hKj _ (le_max_right _ _)))))
theorem exists_gt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, f < const a :=
let ⟨K, H⟩ := f.bounded
⟨K + 1, 1, zero_lt_one, 0, fun i _ => by
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H _)).2⟩
theorem exists_lt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, const a < f :=
let ⟨a, h⟩ := (-f).exists_gt
⟨-a, show Pos _ by rwa [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_sup_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊔ a₂ - b₁ ⊔ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
| -- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_inf_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊓ a₂ - b₁ ⊓ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
instance : Max (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_sup_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
instance : Min (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊓ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Basic.lean | 708 | 724 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of sums etc
In this file we prove formulas about derivatives of `f + g`, `-f`, `f - g`, and `∑ i, f i x` for
functions from the base field to a normed space over this field.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} {L : Filter 𝕜}
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L := by
simpa using (hf.add hg).hasDerivAtFilter
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x := by simpa using (hf.add hg).hasStrictDerivAt
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.add (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
theorem derivWithin_add (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => f y + g y) s x = derivWithin f s x + derivWithin g s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hf.hasDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (fun y => f y + g y) x = deriv f x + deriv g x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.add hg.hasDerivAt).deriv
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivAtFilter (f · + c) f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAtFilter.add_const⟩ := hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasStrictDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivWithinAt (f · + c) f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivWithinAt.add_const⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) : HasDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasDerivAt_add_const_iff
theorem derivWithin_add_const (c : F) :
derivWithin (fun y => f y + c) s x = derivWithin f s x := by
simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_add_const]
theorem deriv_add_const (c : F) : deriv (fun y => f y + c) x = deriv f x := by
simp only [deriv, fderiv_add_const]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_add_const' (c : F) : (deriv fun y => f y + c) = deriv f :=
funext fun _ => deriv_add_const c
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivAtFilter (c + f ·) f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAtFilter.const_add⟩ := hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasStrictDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivWithinAt (c + f ·) f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivWithinAt.const_add⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) : HasDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
| alias ⟨_, HasDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasDerivAt_const_add_iff
theorem derivWithin_const_add (c : F) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Add.lean | 129 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
| rfl
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 200 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson, Martin Dvorak
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Kleene
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Languages
This file contains the definition and operations on formal languages over an alphabet.
Note that "strings" are implemented as lists over the alphabet.
Union and concatenation define a [Kleene algebra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene_algebra)
over the languages.
In addition to that, we define a reversal of a language and prove that it behaves well
with respect to other language operations.
## Notation
* `l + m`: union of languages `l` and `m`
* `l * m`: language of strings `x ++ y` such that `x ∈ l` and `y ∈ m`
* `l ^ n`: language of strings consisting of `n` members of `l` concatenated together
* `1`: language consisting of only the empty string.
This is because it is the unit of the `*` operator.
* `l∗`: Kleene's star – language of strings consisting of arbitrarily many
members of `l` concatenated together
(Note that this is the Unicode asterisk `∗`, and not the more common star `*`)
## Main definitions
* `Language α`: a set of strings over the alphabet `α`
* `l.map f`: transform a language `l` over `α` into a language over `β`
by translating through `f : α → β`
## Main theorems
* `Language.self_eq_mul_add_iff`: Arden's lemma – if a language `l` satisfies the equation
`l = m * l + n`, and `m` doesn't contain the empty string,
then `l` is the language `m∗ * n`
-/
open List Set Computability
universe v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A language is a set of strings over an alphabet. -/
def Language (α) :=
Set (List α)
namespace Language
instance : Membership (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.Mem⟩
instance : Singleton (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.singleton⟩
instance : Insert (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.insert⟩
instance instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Language α) :=
Set.instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra
variable {l m : Language α} {a b x : List α}
/-- Zero language has no elements. -/
instance : Zero (Language α) :=
⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
/-- `1 : Language α` contains only one element `[]`. -/
instance : One (Language α) :=
⟨{[]}⟩
instance : Inhabited (Language α) := ⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
/-- The sum of two languages is their union. -/
instance : Add (Language α) :=
⟨((· ∪ ·) : Set (List α) → Set (List α) → Set (List α))⟩
/-- The product of two languages `l` and `m` is the language made of the strings `x ++ y` where
`x ∈ l` and `y ∈ m`. -/
instance : Mul (Language α) :=
⟨image2 (· ++ ·)⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Language α) = (∅ : Set _) :=
rfl
theorem one_def : (1 : Language α) = ({[]} : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
theorem add_def (l m : Language α) : l + m = (l ∪ m : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
theorem mul_def (l m : Language α) : l * m = image2 (· ++ ·) l m :=
rfl
/-- The Kleene star of a language `L` is the set of all strings which can be written by
concatenating strings from `L`. -/
instance : KStar (Language α) := ⟨fun l ↦ {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l}⟩
lemma kstar_def (l : Language α) : l∗ = {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l} :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {l m : Language α} (h : ∀ (x : List α), x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ m) : l = m :=
Set.ext h
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (x : List α) : x ∉ (0 : Language α) :=
id
@[simp]
theorem mem_one (x : List α) : x ∈ (1 : Language α) ↔ x = [] := by rfl
theorem nil_mem_one : [] ∈ (1 : Language α) :=
Set.mem_singleton _
theorem mem_add (l m : Language α) (x : List α) : x ∈ l + m ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ m :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mul : x ∈ l * m ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, ∃ b ∈ m, a ++ b = x :=
mem_image2
theorem append_mem_mul : a ∈ l → b ∈ m → a ++ b ∈ l * m :=
mem_image2_of_mem
theorem mem_kstar : x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
theorem join_mem_kstar {L : List (List α)} (h : ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l) : L.flatten ∈ l∗ :=
⟨L, rfl, h⟩
theorem nil_mem_kstar (l : Language α) : [] ∈ l∗ :=
⟨[], rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
instance instSemiring : Semiring (Language α) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := union_assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := empty_union
add_zero := union_empty
add_comm := union_comm
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := image2_assoc append_assoc
zero_mul _ := image2_empty_left
mul_zero _ := image2_empty_right
one := 1
one_mul l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
mul_one l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
natCast n := if n = 0 then 0 else 1
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ n := by cases n <;> simp [Nat.cast, add_def, zero_def]
left_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_right
right_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem add_self (l : Language α) : l + l = l :=
sup_idem _
/-- Maps the alphabet of a language. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Language α →+* Language β where
toFun := image (List.map f)
map_zero' := image_empty _
map_one' := image_singleton
map_add' := image_union _
map_mul' _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| fun _ _ => map_append
@[simp]
theorem map_id (l : Language α) : map id l = l := by simp [map]
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (l : Language α) : map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) l := by
simp [map, image_image]
lemma mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty {x : List α} :
x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, rfl, h⟩
refine ⟨S.filter fun l ↦ !List.isEmpty l,
by simp [List.flatten_filter_not_isEmpty], fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [mem_filter, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, isEmpty_eq_false_iff, ne_eq] at hy
exact ⟨h y hy.1, hy.2⟩
· rintro ⟨S, hx, h⟩
exact ⟨S, hx, fun y hy ↦ (h y hy).1⟩
theorem kstar_def_nonempty (l : Language α) :
l∗ = { x | ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] } := by
ext x; apply mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty
theorem le_iff (l m : Language α) : l ≤ m ↔ l + m = m :=
sup_eq_right.symm
theorem le_mul_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : Language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ * l₂ ≤ m₁ * m₂ := by
intro h₁ h₂ x hx
simp only [mul_def, exists_and_left, mem_image2, image_prod] at hx ⊢
tauto
theorem le_add_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : Language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ + l₂ ≤ m₁ + m₂ :=
sup_le_sup
theorem mem_iSup {ι : Sort v} {l : ι → Language α} {x : List α} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, l i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ l i :=
mem_iUnion
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) * m = ⨆ i, l i * m :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(m * ⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m * l i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort v} [Nonempty ι] (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) + m = ⨆ i, l i + m :=
iSup_sup
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort v} [Nonempty ι] (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(m + ⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m + l i :=
sup_iSup
theorem mem_pow {l : Language α} {x : List α} {n : ℕ} :
x ∈ l ^ n ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ S.length = n ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing x
· simp only [mem_one, pow_zero, length_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨[], rfl, rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
· rintro ⟨_, rfl, rfl, _⟩
rfl
· simp only [pow_succ', mem_mul, ihn]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, ⟨S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: S, rfl, rfl, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨ha, hS⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, S⟩, rfl, hn, hS⟩ <;> cases hn
rw [forall_mem_cons] at hS
exact ⟨a, hS.1, _, ⟨S, rfl, rfl, hS.2⟩, rfl⟩
theorem kstar_eq_iSup_pow (l : Language α) : l∗ = ⨆ i : ℕ, l ^ i := by
ext x
simp only [mem_kstar, mem_iSup, mem_pow]
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, rfl, hS⟩
exact ⟨_, S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩
· rintro ⟨_, S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩
exact ⟨S, rfl, hS⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_kstar (f : α → β) (l : Language α) : map f l∗ = (map f l)∗ := by
rw [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, kstar_eq_iSup_pow]
simp_rw [← map_pow]
exact image_iUnion
theorem mul_self_kstar_comm (l : Language α) : l∗ * l = l * l∗ := by
simp only [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, mul_iSup, iSup_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar (l : Language α) : 1 + l * l∗ = l∗ := by
simp only [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, mul_iSup, ← pow_succ', ← pow_zero l]
exact sup_iSup_nat_succ _
@[simp]
theorem one_add_kstar_mul_self_eq_kstar (l : Language α) : 1 + l∗ * l = l∗ := by
rw [mul_self_kstar_comm, one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar]
instance : KleeneAlgebra (Language α) :=
{ instSemiring, instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra with
kstar := fun L ↦ L∗,
one_le_kstar := fun a _ hl ↦ ⟨[], hl, by simp⟩,
mul_kstar_le_kstar := fun a ↦ (one_add_self_mul_kstar_eq_kstar a).le.trans' le_sup_right,
kstar_mul_le_kstar := fun a ↦ (one_add_kstar_mul_self_eq_kstar a).le.trans' le_sup_right,
| kstar_mul_le_self := fun l m h ↦ by
rw [kstar_eq_iSup_pow, iSup_mul]
refine iSup_le (fun n ↦ ?_)
| Mathlib/Computability/Language.lean | 274 | 276 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Prime.Lemmas
/-!
# Theory of degrees of polynomials
Some of the main results include
- `natDegree_comp_le` : The degree of the composition is at most the product of degrees
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {ι : Type w} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Degree
theorem natDegree_comp_le : natDegree (p.comp q) ≤ natDegree p * natDegree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p.comp q = 0 then by rw [h0, natDegree_zero]; exact Nat.zero_le _
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
↑(natDegree (p.comp q)) = degree (p.comp q) := (degree_eq_natDegree h0).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg degree comp_eq_sum_left
_ ≤ _ := degree_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ _ :=
Finset.sup_le fun n hn =>
calc
degree (C (coeff p n) * q ^ n) ≤ degree (C (coeff p n)) + degree (q ^ n) :=
degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • degree q :=
(add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_pow_le _ _))
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • ↑(natDegree q) :=
(add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_right (@degree_le_natDegree _ _ q) n) _)
_ = (n * natDegree q : ℕ) := by
rw [natDegree_C, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, nsmul_eq_mul]
simp
_ ≤ (natDegree p * natDegree q : ℕ) :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mem_support_iff.1 hn))
(Nat.zero_le _)
theorem natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ^ p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p.comp q) = natDegree p * natDegree q := by
by_cases hq : natDegree q = 0
· exact le_antisymm natDegree_comp_le (by simp [hq])
apply natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero natDegree_comp_le
rwa [coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree hq]
theorem degree_pos_of_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (h : IsRoot p a) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hlt
rw [IsRoot, this, eval_C] at h
simp only [h, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact hp this
theorem natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero : p.natDegree ≤ n ↔ ∀ N : ℕ, n < N → p.coeff N = 0 := by
simp_rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_left {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le h qn⟩
refine natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr fun m hm => ?_
convert natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp h m hm using 1
rw [coeff_add, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp qn _ hm, add_zero]
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_right {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ pn
-- TODO: Do we really want the following two lemmas? They are straightforward consequences of a
-- more atomic lemma
theorem natDegree_C_mul_le (a : R) (f : R[X]) : (C a * f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_mul_le (p := C a)
theorem natDegree_mul_C_le (f : R[X]) (a : R) : (f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_mul_le (q := C a)
theorem eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (ns : n ∈ p.support) :
p.natDegree = n :=
le_antisymm pn (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ ns)
theorem natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : ai * a = 1) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_C_mul_le a p)
(calc
p.natDegree = (1 * p).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← one_mul p]
_ = (C ai * (C a * p)).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (C a * p).natDegree := natDegree_C_mul_le ai (C a * p))
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : a * ai = 1) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_mul_C_le p a)
(calc
p.natDegree = (p * 1).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← mul_one p]
_ = (p * C a * C ai).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (p * C a).natDegree := natDegree_mul_C_le (p * C a) ai)
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * a ≠ 0) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_mul_C_le p a) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_mul_C]
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero (h : a * p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_C_mul_le a p) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_C_mul]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-03")]
alias natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero := natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero
lemma degree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero (h : a * p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) : (C a * p).degree = p.degree := by
rw [degree_mul' (by simpa)]; simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul h]
theorem natDegree_add_coeff_mul (f g : R[X]) :
(f * g).coeff (f.natDegree + g.natDegree) = f.coeff f.natDegree * g.coeff g.natDegree := by
simp only [coeff_natDegree, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree]
theorem natDegree_lt_coeff_mul (h : p.natDegree + q.natDegree < m + n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (natDegree_mul_le.trans_lt h)
theorem coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le (pm : p.natDegree ≤ m) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = p.coeff m * q.coeff n := by
simp_rw [← Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply, toFinsupp_mul]
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.apply_add_of_supDegree_le ?_ Function.injective_id ?_ ?_
· simp
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
theorem coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p ^ m).coeff (m * n) = p.coeff n ^ m := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ← hm, Nat.succ_mul, coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le _ pn]
refine natDegree_pow_le.trans (le_trans ?_ (le_refl _))
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left pn m.zero_le
theorem coeff_pow_eq_ite_of_natDegree_le_of_le {o : ℕ}
(pn : natDegree p ≤ n) (mno : m * n ≤ o) :
coeff (p ^ m) o = if o = m * n then (coeff p n) ^ m else 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o (m * n) with rfl | h
· simpa only [ite_true] using coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le pn
· simpa only [h, ite_false] using coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <|
lt_of_le_of_lt (natDegree_pow_le_of_le m pn) (lt_of_le_of_ne mno h.symm)
theorem coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt (qn : q.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = p.coeff n :=
(coeff_add _ _ _).trans <|
(congr_arg _ <| coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| qn).trans <| add_zero _
theorem coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt (pn : p.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = q.coeff n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt pn
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on degree ∘ f)) :
degree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => degree (f i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with x s hx IH
· simp
· simp only [hx, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff, Finset.sup_insert]
specialize IH (h.mono fun _ => by simp +contextual)
rcases lt_trichotomy (degree (f x)) (degree (s.sum f)) with (H | H | H)
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_right.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt H]
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp
obtain ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs fun i => degree (f i)
rw [IH, hy'] at H
by_cases hx0 : f x = 0
· simp [hx0, IH]
have hy0 : f y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! H
simpa [H, degree_eq_bot] using hx0
refine absurd H (h ?_ ?_ fun H => hx ?_)
· simp [hx0]
· simp [hy, hy0]
· exact H.symm ▸ hy
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_left.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt H]
theorem natDegree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on natDegree ∘ f)) :
natDegree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => natDegree (f i) := by
by_cases H : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0
· obtain ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := H
have hs : s.Nonempty := ⟨x, hx⟩
refine natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some ?_
rw [degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint]
· rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs, ← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs,
Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.coe_sup' hs, ←
Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· simpa [hb'] using hs
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hb', Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup' (fun i : S => (natDegree (f i) : WithBot ℕ)) hb
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
simp only [Finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx'
simpa [← Nat.cast_withBot, hb', degree_eq_bot] using hx'
exact ⟨b, hb, (degree_eq_natDegree hb').ge⟩
· exact h.imp fun x y hxy hxy' => hxy (natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq hxy')
· push_neg at H
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero H, natDegree_zero, eq_comm, show 0 = ⊥ from rfl, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
simp [H x hx]
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < natDegree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have A : p = C (p.coeff 0) := eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero hlt
rw [A, eval₂_C] at hz
simp only [inj (p.coeff 0) hz, RingHom.map_zero] at A
exact hp A
theorem degree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < degree p :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp f hz inj)
@[simp]
theorem coe_lt_degree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (n : WithBot ℕ) < degree p ↔ n < natDegree p := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp [h]
simp [degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_lt]
@[simp]
theorem degree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
degree (map f p) = degree p ↔ f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0 ∨ p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with h|h
· simp [h]
simp only [h, or_false]
refine ⟨fun h2 ↦ ?_, degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f⟩
have h3 : natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p := by simp_rw [natDegree, h2]
have h4 : map f p ≠ 0 := by
rwa [ne_eq, ← degree_eq_bot, h2, degree_eq_bot]
rwa [← coeff_natDegree, ← coeff_map, ← h3, coeff_natDegree, ne_eq, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p ↔ f (p.leadingCoeff) ≠ 0 ∨ natDegree p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne (natDegree p) 0 with h|h
· simp_rw [h, ne_eq, or_true, iff_true, ← Nat.le_zero, ← h, natDegree_map_le]
have h2 : p ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp at h
simp_all [natDegree, WithBot.unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero (h : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0) : 0 < p.natDegree := by
rw [nextCoeff] at h
by_cases hpz : p.natDegree = 0
· simp_all only [ne_eq, zero_le, ite_true, not_true_eq_false]
· apply Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hpz
end Degree
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem natDegree_sub : (p - q).natDegree = (q - p).natDegree := by rw [← natDegree_neg, neg_sub]
theorem natDegree_sub_le_iff_left (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p - q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [← natDegree_neg] at qn
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ qn]
theorem natDegree_sub_le_iff_right (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p - q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by rwa [natDegree_sub, natDegree_sub_le_iff_left]
theorem coeff_sub_eq_left_of_lt (dg : q.natDegree < n) : (p - q).coeff n = p.coeff n := by
rw [← natDegree_neg] at dg
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt dg]
theorem coeff_sub_eq_neg_right_of_lt (df : p.natDegree < n) : (p - q).coeff n = -q.coeff n := by
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]} {a : R}
@[simp]
lemma nextCoeff_C_mul_X_add_C (ha : a ≠ 0) (c : R) : nextCoeff (C a * X + C c) = c := by
rw [nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos] <;> simp [ha]
lemma natDegree_eq_one : p.natDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ a ≠ 0, ∃ b, C a * X + C b = p := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ⟨p.coeff 1, fun h ↦ ?_, p.coeff 0, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← hp, coeff_natDegree, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at h
aesop
· ext n
obtain _ | _ | n := n
· simp
· simp
· simp only [coeff_add, coeff_mul_X, coeff_C_succ, add_zero]
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
simp [hp]
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, rfl⟩
simp [ha]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
theorem degree_mul_C (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (p * C a).degree = p.degree := by
rw [degree_mul, degree_C a0, add_zero]
theorem degree_C_mul (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).degree = p.degree := by
rw [degree_mul, degree_C a0, zero_add]
theorem natDegree_mul_C (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp only [natDegree, degree_mul_C a0]
theorem natDegree_C_mul (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp only [natDegree, degree_C_mul a0]
theorem natDegree_comp : natDegree (p.comp q) = natDegree p * natDegree q := by
by_cases q0 : q.natDegree = 0
· rw [degree_le_zero_iff.mp (natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp q0), comp_C, natDegree_C,
natDegree_C, mul_zero]
· by_cases p0 : p = 0
· simp only [p0, zero_comp, natDegree_zero, zero_mul]
· simp only [Ne, mul_eq_zero, leadingCoeff_eq_zero, p0, natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero,
ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero q0), not_false_eq_true, pow_ne_zero, or_self]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_iterate_comp (k : ℕ) :
(p.comp^[k] q).natDegree = p.natDegree ^ k * q.natDegree := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k IH => rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', natDegree_comp, IH, pow_succ', mul_assoc]
theorem leadingCoeff_comp (hq : natDegree q ≠ 0) :
leadingCoeff (p.comp q) = leadingCoeff p * leadingCoeff q ^ natDegree p := by
rw [← coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree hq, ← natDegree_comp, coeff_natDegree]
end NoZeroDivisors
@[simp] lemma comp_neg_X_leadingCoeff_eq [Ring R] (p : R[X]) :
(p.comp (-X)).leadingCoeff = (-1) ^ p.natDegree * p.leadingCoeff := by
nontriviality R
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp [h]
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero, coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree] <;>
simp [((Commute.neg_one_left _).pow_left _).eq, h]
lemma comp_eq_zero_iff [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]} :
p.comp q = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ p.eval (q.coeff 0) = 0 ∧ q = C (q.coeff 0) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Or.rec (fun h ↦ by simp [h]) fun h ↦ by rw [h.2, comp_C, h.1, C_0]⟩
have key : p.natDegree = 0 ∨ q.natDegree = 0 := by
rw [← mul_eq_zero, ← natDegree_comp, h, natDegree_zero]
obtain key | key := Or.imp eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero key
· rw [key, C_comp] at h
exact Or.inl (key.trans h)
· rw [key, comp_C, C_eq_zero] at h
exact Or.inr ⟨h, key⟩
section DivisionRing
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
/-! Useful lemmas for the "monicization" of a nonzero polynomial `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem irreducible_mul_leadingCoeff_inv {p : K[X]} :
Irreducible (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) ↔ Irreducible p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact irreducible_mul_isUnit
(isUnit_C.mpr (IsUnit.mk0 _ (inv_ne_zero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp0))))
@[simp] lemma dvd_mul_leadingCoeff_inv {p q : K[X]} (hp0 : p ≠ 0) :
| q ∣ p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹ ↔ q ∣ p :=
IsUnit.dvd_mul_right <| isUnit_C.mpr <| IsUnit.mk0 _ <|
inv_ne_zero <| leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp0
theorem monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv {p : K[X]} (h : p ≠ 0) : Monic (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Lemmas.lean | 406 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
/-!
# Open sets
## Summary
We define the subtype of open sets in a topological space.
## Main Definitions
### Bundled open sets
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens α` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α`.
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens.IsBasis` is a predicate saying that a set of `Opens`s form a topological
basis.
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens.comap`: preimage of an open set under a continuous map as a `FrameHom`.
- `Homeomorph.opensCongr`: order-preserving equivalence between open sets in the domain and the
codomain of a homeomorphism.
### Bundled open neighborhoods
- `TopologicalSpace.OpenNhdsOf x` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α` containing
`x : α`.
- `TopologicalSpace.OpenNhdsOf.comap f x U` is the preimage of open neighborhood `U` of `f x` under
`f : C(α, β)`.
## Main results
We define order structures on both `Opens α` (`CompleteLattice`, `Frame`) and `OpenNhdsOf x`
(`OrderTop`, `DistribLattice`).
## TODO
- Rename `TopologicalSpace.Opens` to `Open`?
- Port the `auto_cases` tactic version (as a plugin if the ported `auto_cases` will allow plugins).
-/
open Filter Function Order Set
open Topology
variable {ι α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- The type of open subsets of a topological space. -/
structure Opens where
/-- The underlying set of a bundled `TopologicalSpace.Opens` object. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The `TopologicalSpace.Opens.carrier _` is an open set. -/
is_open' : IsOpen carrier
namespace Opens
instance : SetLike (Opens α) α where
coe := Opens.carrier
coe_injective' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ _ => by congr
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Opens α) (↑) IsOpen :=
⟨fun s h => ⟨⟨s, h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
instance instSecondCountableOpens [SecondCountableTopology α] (U : Opens α) :
SecondCountableTopology U := inferInstanceAs (SecondCountableTopology U.1)
theorem «forall» {p : Opens α → Prop} : (∀ U, p U) ↔ ∀ (U : Set α) (hU : IsOpen U), p ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h _, fun h _ => h _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem carrier_eq_coe (U : Opens α) : U.1 = ↑U := rfl
/-- the coercion `Opens α → Set α` applied to a pair is the same as taking the first component -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {U : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} : ↑(⟨U, hU⟩ : Opens α) = U :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {x : α} {U : Set α} {h : IsOpen U} : x ∈ mk U h ↔ x ∈ U := Iff.rfl
protected theorem nonempty_coeSort {U : Opens α} : Nonempty U ↔ (U : Set α).Nonempty :=
Set.nonempty_coe_sort
-- TODO: should this theorem be proved for a `SetLike`?
protected theorem nonempty_coe {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ U :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext] -- TODO: replace with `∀ x, x ∈ U ↔ x ∈ V`?
theorem ext {U V : Opens α} (h : (U : Set α) = V) : U = V :=
SetLike.coe_injective h
theorem coe_inj {U V : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = V ↔ U = V :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
/-- A version of `Set.inclusion` not requiring definitional abuse -/
abbrev inclusion {U V : Opens α} (h : U ≤ V) : U → V := Set.inclusion h
protected theorem isOpen (U : Opens α) : IsOpen (U : Set α) :=
U.is_open'
@[simp] theorem mk_coe (U : Opens α) : mk (↑U) U.isOpen = U := rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (U : Opens α) : Set α := U
initialize_simps_projections Opens (carrier → coe, as_prefix coe)
/-- The interior of a set, as an element of `Opens`. -/
@[simps]
protected def interior (s : Set α) : Opens α :=
⟨interior s, isOpen_interior⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_interior {s : Set α} {x : α} : x ∈ Opens.interior s ↔ x ∈ _root_.interior s := .rfl
theorem gc : GaloisConnection ((↑) : Opens α → Set α) Opens.interior := fun U _ =>
⟨fun h => interior_maximal h U.isOpen, fun h => le_trans h interior_subset⟩
/-- The galois coinsertion between sets and opens. -/
def gi : GaloisCoinsertion (↑) (@Opens.interior α _) where
choice s hs := ⟨s, interior_eq_iff_isOpen.mp <| le_antisymm interior_subset hs⟩
gc := gc
u_l_le _ := interior_subset
choice_eq _s hs := le_antisymm hs interior_subset
instance : CompleteLattice (Opens α) :=
CompleteLattice.copy (GaloisCoinsertion.liftCompleteLattice gi)
-- le
(fun U V => (U : Set α) ⊆ V) rfl
-- top
⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ (ext interior_univ.symm)
-- bot
⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ rfl
-- sup
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∪ ↑V, U.2.union V.2⟩) rfl
-- inf
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∩ ↑V, U.2.inter V.2⟩)
(funext₂ fun U V => ext (U.2.inter V.2).interior_eq.symm)
-- sSup
(fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isOpen_biUnion fun s _ => s.2⟩)
(funext fun _ => ext sSup_image.symm)
-- sInf
_ rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inf_mk {U V : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} {hV : IsOpen V} :
(⟨U, hU⟩ ⊓ ⟨V, hV⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨U ⊓ V, IsOpen.inter hU hV⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∩ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_inf {s t : Opens α} {x : α} : x ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∪ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Opens α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_bot {x : α} : x ∈ (⊥ : Opens α) ↔ False := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_empty : (⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ : Opens α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = ∅ ↔ U = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_top (x : α) : x ∈ (⊤ : Opens α) := trivial
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Opens α) : Set α) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_univ : (⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ : Opens α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = univ ↔ U = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {S : Set (Opens α)} : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋃ i ∈ S, ↑i :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_sup (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.sup f) : Set α) = s.sup ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_sup (⟨⟨(↑), coe_sup⟩, coe_bot⟩ : SupBotHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_inf (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.inf f) : Set α) = s.inf ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_inf (⟨⟨(↑), coe_inf⟩, coe_top⟩ : InfTopHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
instance : Inhabited (Opens α) := ⟨⊥⟩
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Opens α) where
uniq _ := ext <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Opens α) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨⊥, ⊤, mt coe_inj.2 empty_ne_univ⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ((⨆ i, s i : Opens α) : Set α) = ⋃ i, s i := by
simp [iSup]
theorem iSup_def {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ⨆ i, s i = ⟨⋃ i, s i, isOpen_iUnion fun i => (s i).2⟩ :=
ext <| coe_iSup s
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mk {ι} (s : ι → Set α) (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
(⨆ i, ⟨s i, h i⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨⋃ i, s i, isOpen_iUnion h⟩ :=
iSup_def _
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {ι} {x : α} {s : ι → Opens α} : x ∈ iSup s ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ s i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {Us : Set (Opens α)} {x : α} : x ∈ sSup Us ↔ ∃ u ∈ Us, x ∈ u := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, mem_iSup, exists_prop]
/-- Open sets in a topological space form a frame. -/
def frameMinimalAxioms : Frame.MinimalAxioms (Opens α) where
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s :=
(ext <| by simp only [coe_inf, coe_iSup, coe_sSup, Set.inter_iUnion₂]).le
instance instFrame : Frame (Opens α) := .ofMinimalAxioms frameMinimalAxioms
theorem isOpenEmbedding' (U : Opens α) : IsOpenEmbedding (Subtype.val : U → α) :=
| U.isOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal
theorem isOpenEmbedding_of_le {U V : Opens α} (i : U ≤ V) :
| Mathlib/Topology/Sets/Opens.lean | 245 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Maximal.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one, inv_eq]
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
theorem isPrincipal_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)]
(h : I ≠ 0) : Submodule.IsPrincipal I⁻¹.1 := by
rw [val_eq_coe, isPrincipal_iff]
use (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹
have hI : I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) hI).symm
variable {K}
lemma den_mem_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(algebraMap R₁ K) (I.den : R₁) ∈ I⁻¹ := by
rw [mem_inv_iff hI]
intro i hi
rw [← Algebra.smul_def (I.den : R₁) i, ← mem_coe, coe_one]
suffices Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) I.num ≤ 1 from
this <| (den_mul_self_eq_num I).symm ▸ smul_mem_pointwise_smul i I.den I.coeToSubmodule hi
apply le_trans <| map_mono (show I.num ≤ 1 by simp only [Ideal.one_eq_top, le_top, bot_eq_zero])
rw [Ideal.one_eq_top, Submodule.map_top, one_eq_range]
lemma num_le_mul_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I.num ≤ I * I⁻¹ := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, num_zero_eq <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K, zero_mul, zero_eq_bot,
coeIdeal_bot]
· rw [mul_comm, ← den_mul_self_eq_num']
exact mul_right_mono I <| spanSingleton_le_iff_mem.2 (den_mem_inv hI)
lemma bot_lt_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < I * I⁻¹ :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (coeIdeal_ne_zero.2 (hI ∘ num_eq_zero_iff.1)).bot_lt I.num_le_mul_inv
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := { inv_one := div_one }
end FractionalIdeal
section IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [IsDomain A]
/-- A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `IsDedekindDomain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `IsDedekindDomain A`, which implies `IsDedekindDomainInv`. For **integral** ideals,
`IsDedekindDomain`(`_inv`) implies only `Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`.
-/
def IsDedekindDomainInv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
open FractionalIdeal
variable {R A K}
theorem isDedekindDomainInv_iff [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] :
IsDedekindDomainInv A ↔ ∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
let h : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A) ≃+* FractionalIdeal A⁰ K :=
FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv (FractionRing.algEquiv A K)
refine h.toEquiv.forall_congr (fun {x} => ?_)
rw [← h.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
simp [h, IsDedekindDomainInv]
theorem FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (x : K)
(hx : IsIntegral A x) (hI : IsUnit (adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx)) : adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx = 1 := by
set I := adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx
have mul_self : IsIdempotentElem I := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, adjoinIntegral_coe, I]
rw [(Algebra.adjoin A {x}).isIdempotentElem_toSubmodule]
convert congr_arg (· * I⁻¹) mul_self <;>
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one]
namespace IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (h : IsDedekindDomainInv A)
include h
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
isDedekindDomainInv_iff.mp h I hI
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
protected theorem isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : IsUnit I :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
theorem isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A := by
refine isNoetherianRing_iff.mpr ⟨fun I : Ideal A => ?_⟩
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· rw [hI]; apply Submodule.fg_bot
have hI : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
exact I.fg_of_isUnit (IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A)) (h.isUnit hI)
theorem integrallyClosed : IsIntegrallyClosed A := by
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine (isIntegrallyClosed_iff (FractionRing A)).mpr (fun {x hx} => ?_)
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← Algebra.mem_bot, ← Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot,
Submodule.one_eq_span, ← coe_spanSingleton A⁰ (1 : FractionRing A), spanSingleton_one, ←
FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit x hx (h.isUnit _)]
· exact mem_adjoinIntegral_self A⁰ x hx
· exact fun h => one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (Algebra.adjoin A {x}).one_mem)
open Ring
theorem dimensionLEOne : DimensionLEOne A := ⟨by
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintro P P_ne hP
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, fun M hM => ?_⟩
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr P_ne
have M'_ne : (M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hM.ne_bot
-- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ P by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A), coeIdeal_top]
calc
(1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = _ * _ * _ := ?_
_ ≤ _ * _ := mul_right_mono
((P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) this
_ = M := ?_
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne,
one_mul, h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
· rw [← mul_assoc (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), h.mul_inv_eq_one P'_ne, one_mul]
-- Suppose we have `x ∈ M⁻¹ * P`, then in fact `x = algebraMap _ _ y` for some `y`.
intro x hx
have le_one : (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ 1 := by
rw [← h.inv_mul_eq_one M'_ne]
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A)).mpr hM.le)
obtain ⟨y, _hy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp (le_one hx)
-- Since `M` is strictly greater than `P`, let `z ∈ M \ P`.
obtain ⟨z, hzM, hzp⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt hM
-- We have `z * y ∈ M * (M⁻¹ * P) = P`.
have zy_mem := mul_mem_mul (mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ hzM) hx
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_eq_one M'_ne, one_mul] at zy_mem
obtain ⟨zy, hzy, zy_eq⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal A⁰).mp zy_mem
rw [IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A) zy_eq] at hzy
-- But `P` is a prime ideal, so `z ∉ P` implies `y ∈ P`, as desired.
exact mem_coeIdeal_of_mem A⁰ (Or.resolve_left (hP.mem_or_mem hzy) hzp)⟩
/-- Showing one side of the equivalence between the definitions
`IsDedekindDomainInv` and `IsDedekindDomain` of Dedekind domains. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain : IsDedekindDomain A :=
{ h.isNoetherianRing, h.dimensionLEOne, h.integrallyClosed with }
end IsDedekindDomainInv
end IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable {A K}
theorem one_mem_inv_coe_ideal [IsDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(1 : K) ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI)]
intro y hy
rw [one_mul]
exact FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_le_one hy
/-- Specialization of `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` to Dedekind domains:
Let `I : Ideal A` be a nonzero ideal, where `A` is a Dedekind domain that is not a field.
Then `exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain` states we can find a product of prime
ideals that is contained within `I`. This lemma extends that result by making the product minimal:
let `M` be a maximal ideal that contains `I`, then the product including `M` is contained within `I`
and the product excluding `M` is not contained within `I`. -/
theorem exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le [IsDedekindDomain A] (hNF : ¬IsField A)
{I M : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hIM : I ≤ M) [hM : M.IsMaximal] :
∃ Z : Multiset (PrimeSpectrum A),
(M ::ₘ Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧
¬Multiset.prod (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal) ≤ I := by
-- Let `Z` be a minimal set of prime ideals such that their product is contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z₀, hZ₀⟩ := PrimeSpectrum.exists_primeSpectrum_prod_le_and_ne_bot_of_domain hNF hI0
obtain ⟨Z, ⟨hZI, hprodZ⟩, h_eraseZ⟩ :=
wellFounded_lt.has_min
{Z | (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≤ I ∧ (Z.map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥}
⟨Z₀, hZ₀.1, hZ₀.2⟩
obtain ⟨_, hPZ', hPM⟩ := hM.isPrime.multiset_prod_le.mp (hZI.trans hIM)
-- Then in fact there is a `P ∈ Z` with `P ≤ M`.
obtain ⟨P, hPZ, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hPZ'
classical
have := Multiset.map_erase PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal (fun _ _ => PrimeSpectrum.ext) P Z
obtain ⟨hP0, hZP0⟩ : P.asIdeal ≠ ⊥ ∧ ((Z.erase P).map PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal).prod ≠ ⊥ := by
rwa [Ne, ← Multiset.cons_erase hPZ', Multiset.prod_cons, Ideal.mul_eq_bot, not_or, ←
this] at hprodZ
-- By maximality of `P` and `M`, we have that `P ≤ M` implies `P = M`.
have hPM' := (P.isPrime.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hM.ne_top hPM
subst hPM'
-- By minimality of `Z`, erasing `P` from `Z` is exactly what we need.
refine ⟨Z.erase P, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert hZI
rw [this, Multiset.cons_erase hPZ']
· refine fun h => h_eraseZ (Z.erase P) ⟨h, ?_⟩ (Multiset.erase_lt.mpr hPZ)
exact hZP0
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
lemma not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A}
(hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ¬(I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) ≤ 1 := by
have hNF : ¬IsField A := fun h ↦ letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).elim hI0 hI1
wlog hM : I.IsMaximal generalizing I
· rcases I.exists_le_maximal hI1 with ⟨M, hmax, hIM⟩
have hMbot : M ≠ ⊥ := (M.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF).ne'
refine mt (le_trans <| inv_anti_mono ?_ ?_ ?_) (this hMbot hmax.ne_top hmax) <;>
simpa only [coeIdeal_ne_zero, coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal]
have hI0 : ⊥ < I := I.bot_lt_of_maximal hNF
obtain ⟨⟨a, haI⟩, ha0⟩ := Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt hI0
replace ha0 : a ≠ 0 := Subtype.coe_injective.ne ha0
let J : Ideal A := Ideal.span {a}
have hJ0 : J ≠ ⊥ := mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp ha0
have hJI : J ≤ I := I.span_singleton_le_iff_mem.2 haI
-- Then we can find a product of prime (hence maximal) ideals contained in `J`,
-- such that removing element `M` from the product is not contained in `J`.
obtain ⟨Z, hle, hnle⟩ := exists_multiset_prod_cons_le_and_prod_not_le hNF hJ0 hJI
-- Choose an element `b` of the product that is not in `J`.
obtain ⟨b, hbZ, hbJ⟩ := SetLike.not_le_iff_exists.mp hnle
have hnz_fa : algebraMap A K a ≠ 0 :=
mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) a) ha0
-- Then `b a⁻¹ : K` is in `M⁻¹` but not in `1`.
refine Set.not_subset.2 ⟨algebraMap A K b * (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹, (mem_inv_iff ?_).mpr ?_, ?_⟩
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0.ne'
· rintro y₀ hy₀
obtain ⟨y, h_Iy, rfl⟩ := (mem_coeIdeal _).mp hy₀
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul]
have h_yb : y * b ∈ J := by
apply hle
rw [Multiset.prod_cons]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul h_Iy hbZ
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at h_yb
rcases h_yb with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hnz_fa, mul_one]
apply coe_mem_one
· refine mt (mem_one_iff _).mp ?_
rintro ⟨x', h₂_abs⟩
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq hnz_fa, ← RingHom.map_mul] at h₂_abs
have := Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨x', IsFractionRing.injective A K h₂_abs⟩
contradiction
theorem exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) : ∃ x ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x ∉ (1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :=
Set.not_subset.1 <| not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot hI0 hI1
theorem mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one [h : IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal A} (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥)
(hI : (I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1) : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show a contradiction with `exists_not_mem_one_of_ne_bot`:
-- `J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹` cannot have an element `x ∉ 1`, so it must equal `1`.
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ : ∃ J : Ideal A, (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) = I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp mul_one_div_le_one
by_cases hJ0 : J = ⊥
· subst hJ0
refine absurd ?_ hI0
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K, hJ]
exact coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv K I
by_cases hJ1 : J = ⊤
· rw [← hJ, hJ1, coeIdeal_top]
exact (not_inv_le_one_of_ne_bot (K := K) hJ0 hJ1 (hJ ▸ hI)).elim
/-- Nonzero integral ideals in a Dedekind domain are invertible.
We will use this to show that nonzero fractional ideals are invertible,
and finally conclude that fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain form a group with zero.
-/
theorem coe_ideal_mul_inv [h : IsDedekindDomain A] (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) :
I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- We'll show `1 ≤ J⁻¹ = (I * I⁻¹)⁻¹ ≤ 1`.
apply mul_inv_cancel_of_le_one hI0
by_cases hJ0 : I * (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0
· rw [hJ0, inv_zero']; exact zero_le _
intro x hx
-- In particular, we'll show all `x ∈ J⁻¹` are integral.
suffices x ∈ integralClosure A K by
rwa [IsIntegrallyClosed.integralClosure_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_bot, Set.mem_range,
← mem_one_iff] at this
-- For that, we'll find a subalgebra that is f.g. as a module and contains `x`.
-- `A` is a noetherian ring, so we just need to find a subalgebra between `{x}` and `I⁻¹`.
rw [mem_integralClosure_iff_mem_fg]
have x_mul_mem : ∀ b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), x * b ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
intro b hb
rw [mem_inv_iff (coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI0)]
dsimp only at hx
rw [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ0] at hx
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_comm b] at hx ⊢
intro y hy
exact hx _ (mul_mem_mul hy hb)
-- It turns out the subalgebra consisting of all `p(x)` for `p : A[X]` works.
refine ⟨AlgHom.range (Polynomial.aeval x : A[X] →ₐ[A] K),
isNoetherian_submodule.mp (isNoetherian (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) _ fun y hy => ?_,
⟨Polynomial.X, Polynomial.aeval_X x⟩⟩
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := (AlgHom.mem_range _).mp hy
rw [Polynomial.aeval_eq_sum_range]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ?_
clear hi
induction' i with i ih
· rw [pow_zero]; exact one_mem_inv_coe_ideal hI0
· show x ^ i.succ ∈ (I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)
rw [pow_succ']; exact x_mul_mem _ ih
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain are units.
This is also available as `_root_.mul_inv_cancel`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hne : I ≠ 0) :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, hJ⟩ :
∃ (a : A) (aI : Ideal A), a ≠ 0 ∧ I = spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap A K a)⁻¹ * aI :=
exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
suffices h₂ : I * (spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹) = 1 by
rw [mul_inv_cancel_iff]
exact ⟨spanSingleton A⁰ (algebraMap _ _ a) * (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K)⁻¹, h₂⟩
subst hJ
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), coe_ideal_mul_inv, mul_one,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, inv_mul_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
· exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap A K)).mp (IsFractionRing.injective A K) _) ha
· exact coeIdeal_ne_zero.mp (right_ne_zero_of_mul hne)
theorem mul_right_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
∀ {I I'}, I * J ≤ I' * J ↔ I ≤ I' := by
intro I I'
constructor
· intro h
convert mul_right_mono J⁻¹ h <;> dsimp only <;>
rw [mul_assoc, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
· exact fun h => mul_right_mono J h
theorem mul_left_le_iff [IsDedekindDomain A] {J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) {I I'} :
J * I ≤ J * I' ↔ I ≤ I' := by convert mul_right_le_iff hJ using 1; simp only [mul_comm]
theorem mul_right_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (· * I) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_right_le_iff hI).symm
theorem mul_left_strictMono [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
StrictMono (I * ·) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => (mul_left_le_iff hI).symm
/-- This is also available as `_root_.div_eq_mul_inv`, using the
`Semifield` instance defined below.
-/
protected theorem div_eq_mul_inv [IsDedekindDomain A] (I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) :
I / J = I * J⁻¹ := by
by_cases hJ : J = 0
· rw [hJ, div_zero, inv_zero', mul_zero]
refine le_antisymm ((mul_right_le_iff hJ).mp ?_) ((le_div_iff_mul_le hJ).mpr ?_)
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one, mul_le]
intro x hx y hy
rw [mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ] at hx
exact hx y hy
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm J⁻¹, FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hJ, mul_one]
end FractionalIdeal
/-- `IsDedekindDomain` and `IsDedekindDomainInv` are equivalent ways
to express that an integral domain is a Dedekind domain. -/
theorem isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv [IsDomain A] :
IsDedekindDomain A ↔ IsDedekindDomainInv A :=
⟨fun _h _I hI => FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel hI, fun h => h.isDedekindDomain⟩
end Inverse
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open FractionalIdeal
open Ideal
noncomputable instance FractionalIdeal.semifield : Semifield (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ := coeIdeal_injective.nontrivial
inv_zero := inv_zero' _
div_eq_mul_inv := FractionalIdeal.div_eq_mul_inv
mul_inv_cancel _ := FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
#adaptation_note /-- 2025-03-29 for lean4#7717 had to add `mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero` field.
TODO(kmill) There is trouble calculating the type of the `IsLeftCancelMulZero` parent. -/
/-- Fractional ideals have cancellative multiplication in a Dedekind domain.
Although this instance is a direct consequence of the instance
`FractionalIdeal.semifield`, we define this instance to provide
a computable alternative.
-/
instance FractionalIdeal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) where
__ : CommSemiring (FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := inferInstance
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := mul_left_cancel₀
instance Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero : CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Ideal A) :=
{ Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero (coeIdealHom A⁰ (FractionRing A)) coeIdeal_injective
(RingHom.map_zero _) (RingHom.map_one _) (RingHom.map_mul _) (RingHom.map_pow _) with }
-- Porting note: Lean can infer all it needs by itself
instance Ideal.isDomain : IsDomain (Ideal A) := { }
/-- For ideals in a Dedekind domain, to divide is to contain. -/
theorem Ideal.dvd_iff_le {I J : Ideal A} : I ∣ J ↔ J ≤ I :=
⟨Ideal.le_of_dvd, fun h => by
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· have hJ : J = ⊥ := by rwa [hI, ← eq_bot_iff] at h
rw [hI, hJ]
have hI' : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
have : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A))⁻¹ * J ≤ 1 := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel₀ hI']
exact mul_left_mono _ ((coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal _).mpr h)
obtain ⟨H, hH⟩ := le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal.mp this
use H
refine coeIdeal_injective (show (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = ↑(I * H) from ?_)
rw [coeIdeal_mul, hH, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hI', one_mul]⟩
theorem Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt {I J : Ideal A} : DvdNotUnit I J ↔ J < I :=
⟨fun ⟨hI, H, hunit, hmul⟩ =>
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp ⟨H, hmul⟩)
(mt
(fun h =>
have : H = 1 := mul_left_cancel₀ hI (by rw [← hmul, h, mul_one])
show IsUnit H from this.symm ▸ isUnit_one)
hunit),
fun h =>
dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr (le_of_lt h))
(mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt h))⟩
instance : WfDvdMonoid (Ideal A) where
wf := by
have : WellFoundedGT (Ideal A) := inferInstance
convert this.wf
ext
rw [Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt]
instance Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ irreducible_iff_prime := by
intro P
exact ⟨fun hirr => ⟨hirr.ne_zero, hirr.not_isUnit, fun I J => by
have : P.IsMaximal := by
refine ⟨⟨mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mpr hirr.not_isUnit, ?_⟩⟩
intro J hJ
obtain ⟨_J_ne, H, hunit, P_eq⟩ := Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mpr hJ
exact Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp ((hirr.isUnit_or_isUnit P_eq).resolve_right hunit)
rw [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.dvd_iff_le, SetLike.le_def, SetLike.le_def,
SetLike.le_def]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨x, x_mem, x_not_mem⟩, ⟨y, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩⟩
exact
⟨x * y, Ideal.mul_mem_mul x_mem y_mem,
mt this.isPrime.mem_or_mem (not_or_intro x_not_mem y_not_mem)⟩⟩, Prime.irreducible⟩ }
instance Ideal.normalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid (Ideal A) := .ofUniqueUnits
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.dvd_span_singleton {I : Ideal A} {x : A} : I ∣ Ideal.span {x} ↔ x ∈ I :=
Ideal.dvd_iff_le.trans (Ideal.span_le.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff)
theorem Ideal.isPrime_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) : IsPrime P := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
rw [← Ideal.one_eq_top] at h
exact h.not_unit isUnit_one
· simp only [← Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hxy ⊢
exact h.dvd_or_dvd hxy
theorem Ideal.prime_of_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (h : IsPrime P) : Prime P := by
refine ⟨hP, mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp h.ne_top, fun I J hIJ => ?_⟩
simpa only [Ideal.dvd_iff_le] using h.mul_le.mp (Ideal.le_of_dvd hIJ)
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the (nonzero) prime elements of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`
are exactly the prime ideals. -/
theorem Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime {P : Ideal A} (hP : P ≠ ⊥) : Prime P ↔ IsPrime P :=
⟨Ideal.isPrime_of_prime, Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP⟩
/-- In a Dedekind domain, the prime ideals are the zero ideal together with the prime elements
of the monoid with zero `Ideal A`. -/
theorem Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime {P : Ideal A} : IsPrime P ↔ P = ⊥ ∨ Prime P :=
⟨fun hp => (eq_or_ne P ⊥).imp_right fun hp0 => Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hp0 hp, fun hp =>
hp.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_prime) Ideal.isPrime_of_prime⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.prime_span_singleton_iff {a : A} : Prime (Ideal.span {a}) ↔ Prime a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· rw [Set.singleton_zero, span_zero, ← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_prime_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· have ha' : span {a} ≠ ⊥ := by simpa only [ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot] using ha
rw [Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime ha', Ideal.span_singleton_prime ha]
open Submodule.IsPrincipal in
theorem Ideal.prime_generator_of_prime {P : Ideal A} (h : Prime P) [P.IsPrincipal] :
Prime (generator P) :=
have : Ideal.IsPrime P := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime h
prime_generator_of_isPrime _ h.ne_zero
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid in
nonrec theorem Ideal.mem_normalizedFactors_iff {p I : Ideal A} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
p ∈ normalizedFactors I ↔ p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p := by
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [← zero_eq_bot] at hI
simp only [hp, zero_not_mem_normalizedFactors, zero_dvd_iff, hI, false_iff, not_and,
not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
· rwa [mem_normalizedFactors_iff hI, prime_iff_isPrime]
theorem Ideal.pow_right_strictAnti (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) :
StrictAnti (I ^ · : ℕ → Ideal A) :=
strictAnti_nat_of_succ_lt fun e =>
Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp ⟨pow_ne_zero _ hI0, I, mt isUnit_iff.mp hI1, pow_succ I e⟩
theorem Ideal.pow_lt_self (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) (he : 2 ≤ e) :
I ^ e < I := by
convert I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 he
dsimp only
rw [pow_one]
theorem Ideal.exists_mem_pow_not_mem_pow_succ (I : Ideal A) (hI0 : I ≠ ⊥) (hI1 : I ≠ ⊤) (e : ℕ) :
∃ x ∈ I ^ e, x ∉ I ^ (e + 1) :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (I.pow_right_strictAnti hI0 hI1 e.lt_succ_self)
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_of_succ_lt_of_le {P I : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥)
{i : ℕ} (hlt : P ^ (i + 1) < I) (hle : I ≤ P ^ i) : I = P ^ i := by
refine le_antisymm hle ?_
have P_prime' := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP P_prime
have h1 : I ≠ ⊥ := (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le hlt).ne'
have := pow_ne_zero i hP
have h3 := pow_ne_zero (i + 1) hP
rw [← Ideal.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt, dvdNotUnit_iff_normalizedFactors_lt_normalizedFactors h1 h3,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, Multiset.lt_replicate_succ] at hlt
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_pow,
normalizedFactors_irreducible P_prime'.irreducible, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
all_goals assumption
theorem Ideal.pow_succ_lt_pow {P : Ideal A} [P_prime : P.IsPrime] (hP : P ≠ ⊥) (i : ℕ) :
P ^ (i + 1) < P ^ i :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.le_succ _))
(mt (pow_inj_of_not_isUnit (mt Ideal.isUnit_iff.mp P_prime.ne_top) hP).mp i.succ_ne_self)
theorem Associates.le_singleton_iff (x : A) (n : ℕ) (I : Ideal A) :
Associates.mk I ^ n ≤ Associates.mk (Ideal.span {x}) ↔ x ∈ I ^ n := by
simp_rw [← Associates.dvd_eq_le, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk,
Ideal.dvd_span_singleton]
variable {K}
lemma FractionalIdeal.le_inv_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J⁻¹ ↔ J ≤ I⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, inv_eq, le_div_iff_mul_le hI, le_div_iff_mul_le hJ, mul_comm]
lemma FractionalIdeal.inv_le_comm {I J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
I⁻¹ ≤ J ↔ J⁻¹ ≤ I := by
simpa using le_inv_comm (A := A) (K := K) (inv_ne_zero hI) (inv_ne_zero hJ)
open FractionalIdeal
/-- Strengthening of `IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples`:
Let `J ≠ ⊤` be an ideal in a Dedekind domain `A`, and `f ≠ 0` a finite collection
of elements of `K = Frac(A)`, then we can multiply the elements of `f` by some `a : K`
to find a collection of elements of `A` that is not completely contained in `J`. -/
theorem Ideal.exist_integer_multiples_not_mem {J : Ideal A} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
(f : ι → K) {j} (hjs : j ∈ s) (hjf : f j ≠ 0) :
∃ a : K,
(∀ i ∈ s, IsLocalization.IsInteger A (a * f i)) ∧
∃ i ∈ s, a * f i ∉ (J : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K) := by
-- Consider the fractional ideal `I` spanned by the `f`s.
let I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K := spanFinset A s f
have hI0 : I ≠ 0 := spanFinset_ne_zero.mpr ⟨j, hjs, hjf⟩
-- We claim the multiplier `a` we're looking for is in `I⁻¹ \ (J / I)`.
suffices ↑J / I < I⁻¹ by
obtain ⟨_, a, hI, hpI⟩ := SetLike.lt_iff_le_and_exists.mp this
rw [mem_inv_iff hI0] at hI
refine ⟨a, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
-- By definition, `a ∈ I⁻¹` multiplies elements of `I` into elements of `1`,
-- in other words, `a * f i` is an integer.
· exact (mem_one_iff _).mp (hI (f i) (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hi)))
· contrapose! hpI
-- And if all `a`-multiples of `I` are an element of `J`,
-- then `a` is actually an element of `J / I`, contradiction.
refine (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI0).mpr fun y hy => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hy
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; exact hpI i hi
· rw [mul_zero]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [mul_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
· intro b x _ hx; rw [mul_smul_comm]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ b hx
-- To show the inclusion of `J / I` into `I⁻¹ = 1 / I`, note that `J < I`.
calc
↑J / I = ↑J * I⁻¹ := div_eq_mul_inv (↑J) I
_ < 1 * I⁻¹ := mul_right_strictMono (inv_ne_zero hI0) ?_
_ = I⁻¹ := one_mul _
rw [← coeIdeal_top]
-- And multiplying by `I⁻¹` is indeed strictly monotone.
exact
strictMono_of_le_iff_le (fun _ _ => (coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal K).symm)
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hJ)
section Gcd
namespace Ideal
/-! ### GCD and LCM of ideals in a Dedekind domain
We show that the gcd of two ideals in a Dedekind domain is just their supremum,
and the lcm is their infimum, and use this to instantiate `NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_inf (I J : Ideal A) : (I ⊔ J) * (I ⊓ J) = I * J := by
letI := UniqueFactorizationMonoid.toNormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A)
have hgcd : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [gcd_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [dvd_iff_le, sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _⟩
· rw [dvd_gcd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
have hlcm : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := by
rw [lcm_eq_normalize _ _, normalize_eq]
· rw [lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le]
simp
· rw [dvd_iff_le, le_inf_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
exact ⟨dvd_lcm_left _ _, dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩
rw [← hgcd, ← hlcm, associated_iff_eq.mp (gcd_mul_lcm _ _)]
/-- Ideals in a Dedekind domain have gcd and lcm operators that (trivially) are compatible with
the normalization operator. -/
instance : NormalizedGCDMonoid (Ideal A) :=
{ Ideal.normalizationMonoid with
gcd := (· ⊔ ·)
gcd_dvd_left := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_left
gcd_dvd_right := fun _ _ => by simpa only [dvd_iff_le] using le_sup_right
dvd_gcd := by
simp only [dvd_iff_le]
exact fun h1 h2 => @sup_le (Ideal A) _ _ _ _ h1 h2
lcm := (· ⊓ ·)
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq]
lcm_zero_right := fun _ => by simp only [zero_eq_bot, inf_bot_eq]
gcd_mul_lcm := fun _ _ => by rw [associated_iff_eq, sup_mul_inf]
normalize_gcd := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _
normalize_lcm := fun _ _ => normalize_eq _ }
-- In fact, any lawful gcd and lcm would equal sup and inf respectively.
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_sup (I J : Ideal A) : gcd I J = I ⊔ J := rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_inf (I J : Ideal A) : lcm I J = I ⊓ J := rfl
theorem isCoprime_iff_gcd {I J : Ideal A} : IsCoprime I J ↔ gcd I J = 1 := by
rw [Ideal.isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, one_eq_top, gcd_eq_sup]
theorem factors_span_eq {p : K[X]} : factors (span {p}) = (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with rfl | hp; · simpa [Set.singleton_zero] using normalizedFactors_zero
have : ∀ q ∈ (factors p).map (fun q ↦ span {q}), Prime q := fun q hq ↦ by
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp hq
exact prime_span_singleton_iff.mpr <| prime_of_factor r hr
rw [← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr (factors_prod hp), ← multiset_prod_span_singleton,
factors_eq_normalizedFactors, normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime this]
end Ideal
end Gcd
end IsDedekindDomain
section IsDedekindDomain
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] [IsDedekindDomain T] {I J : Ideal T}
open Multiset UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
theorem prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : (normalizedFactors I).prod = I :=
associated_iff_eq.1 (prod_normalizedFactors hI)
theorem count_le_of_ideal_ge [DecidableEq (Ideal T)]
{I J : Ideal T} (h : I ≤ J) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (K : Ideal T) :
count K (normalizedFactors J) ≤ count K (normalizedFactors I) :=
le_iff_count.1 ((dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI h) hI).1
(dvd_iff_le.2 h))
_
theorem sup_eq_prod_inf_factors [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
I ⊔ J = (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod := by
have H : normalizedFactors (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J).prod =
normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J := by
apply normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime
intro p hp
rw [mem_inter] at hp
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left
have := Multiset.prod_ne_zero_of_prime (normalizedFactors I ∩ normalizedFactors J) fun _ h =>
prime_of_normalized_factor _ (Multiset.mem_inter.1 h).1
apply le_antisymm
· rw [sup_le_iff, ← dvd_iff_le, ← dvd_iff_le]
constructor
· rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors this hI, H]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors this hJ, H]
exact inf_le_right
· rw [← dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors,
normalizedFactors_prod_of_prime, le_iff_count]
· intro a
rw [Multiset.count_inter]
exact le_min (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_left hI a) (count_le_of_ideal_ge le_sup_right hJ a)
· intro p hp
rw [mem_inter] at hp
exact prime_of_normalized_factor p hp.left
· exact ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hI le_sup_left
· exact this
theorem irreducible_pow_sup [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ min ((normalizedFactors I).count J) n := by
rw [sup_eq_prod_inf_factors (pow_ne_zero n hJ.ne_zero) hI, min_comm,
normalizedFactors_of_irreducible_pow hJ, normalize_eq J, replicate_inter, prod_replicate]
theorem irreducible_pow_sup_of_le (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≤ emultiplicity J I) :
J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ n := by
classical
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· simp_all
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_right]
rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J] at hn
exact_mod_cast hn
theorem irreducible_pow_sup_of_ge (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : Irreducible J) (n : ℕ)
(hn : emultiplicity J I ≤ n) : J ^ n ⊔ I = J ^ multiplicity J I := by
classical
rw [irreducible_pow_sup hI hJ, min_eq_left]
· congr
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), ← FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity,
emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J]
rw [← emultiplicity_lt_top]
apply hn.trans_lt
simp
· rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hJ hI, normalize_eq J] at hn
exact_mod_cast hn
theorem Ideal.eq_prime_pow_mul_coprime [DecidableEq (Ideal T)] {I : Ideal T} (hI : I ≠ ⊥)
(P : Ideal T) [hpm : P.IsMaximal] :
∃ Q : Ideal T, P ⊔ Q = ⊤ ∧ I = P ^ (Multiset.count P (normalizedFactors I)) * Q := by
use (filter (¬ P = ·) (normalizedFactors I)).prod
constructor
· refine P.sup_multiset_prod_eq_top (fun p hpi ↦ ?_)
have hp : Prime p := prime_of_normalized_factor p (filter_subset _ (normalizedFactors I) hpi)
exact hpm.coprime_of_ne ((isPrime_of_prime hp).isMaximal hp.ne_zero) (of_mem_filter hpi)
· nth_rw 1 [← prod_normalizedFactors_eq_self hI, ← filter_add_not (P = ·) (normalizedFactors I)]
rw [prod_add, pow_count]
end IsDedekindDomain
/-!
### Height one spectrum of a Dedekind domain
If `R` is a Dedekind domain of Krull dimension 1, the maximal ideals of `R` are exactly its nonzero
prime ideals.
We define `HeightOneSpectrum` and provide lemmas to recover the facts that prime ideals of height
one are prime and irreducible.
-/
namespace IsDedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
/-- The height one prime spectrum of a Dedekind domain `R` is the type of nonzero prime ideals of
`R`. Note that this equals the maximal spectrum if `R` has Krull dimension 1. -/
@[ext, nolint unusedArguments]
structure HeightOneSpectrum where
asIdeal : Ideal R
isPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
ne_bot : asIdeal ≠ ⊥
attribute [instance] HeightOneSpectrum.isPrime
variable (v : HeightOneSpectrum R) {R}
namespace HeightOneSpectrum
instance isMaximal : v.asIdeal.IsMaximal := v.isPrime.isMaximal v.ne_bot
theorem prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
theorem irreducible : Irreducible v.asIdeal :=
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.irreducible_iff_prime.mpr v.prime
theorem associates_irreducible : Irreducible <| Associates.mk v.asIdeal :=
Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
/-- An equivalence between the height one and maximal spectra for rings of Krull dimension 1. -/
def equivMaximalSpectrum (hR : ¬IsField R) : HeightOneSpectrum R ≃ MaximalSpectrum R where
toFun v := ⟨v.asIdeal, v.isPrime.isMaximal v.ne_bot⟩
invFun v :=
⟨v.asIdeal, v.isMaximal.isPrime, Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField v.isMaximal hR⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
variable (R)
/-- A Dedekind domain is equal to the intersection of its localizations at all its height one
non-zero prime ideals viewed as subalgebras of its field of fractions. -/
theorem iInf_localization_eq_bot [Algebra R K] [hK : IsFractionRing R K] :
(⨅ v : HeightOneSpectrum R,
Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ v.asIdeal.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors) = ⊥ := by
ext x
rw [Algebra.mem_iInf]
constructor
on_goal 1 => by_cases hR : IsField R
· rcases Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mp
(IsField.localization_map_bijective (Rₘ := K) (flip nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero rfl : 0 ∉ R⁰) hR)
with ⟨algebra_map_inv, _, algebra_map_right_inv⟩
exact fun _ => Algebra.mem_bot.mpr ⟨algebra_map_inv x, algebra_map_right_inv x⟩
all_goals rw [← MaximalSpectrum.iInf_localization_eq_bot, Algebra.mem_iInf]
· exact fun hx ⟨v, hv⟩ => hx ((equivMaximalSpectrum hR).symm ⟨v, hv⟩)
· exact fun hx ⟨v, hv, hbot⟩ => hx ⟨v, hv.isMaximal hbot⟩
end HeightOneSpectrum
end IsDedekindDomain
section
open Ideal
variable {R A}
variable [IsDedekindDomain A] {I : Ideal R} {J : Ideal A}
/-- The map from ideals of `R` dividing `I` to the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
a homomorphism `f : R/I →+* A/J` -/
@[simps] -- Porting note: use `Subtype` instead of `Set` to make linter happy
def idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{p : Ideal R // p ∣ I} →o {p : Ideal A // p ∣ J} where
toFun X := ⟨comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)), by
have : RingHom.ker (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) ≤
comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (map f (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X)) :=
ker_le_comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
rw [mk_ker] at this
exact dvd_iff_le.mpr this⟩
monotone' := by
rintro ⟨X, hX⟩ ⟨Y, hY⟩ h
rw [← Subtype.coe_le_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk] at h ⊢
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, map_le_iff_le_comap, Subtype.coe_mk,
comap_map_of_surjective _ hf (map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y)]
suffices map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) X ≤ map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) Y by
exact le_sup_of_le_left this
rwa [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, ← RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, mk_ker,
sup_eq_left.mpr <| le_of_dvd hY]
@[simp]
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id :
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (RingHom.id (A ⧸ J)).surjective = OrderHom.id :=
OrderHom.ext _ _
(funext fun X => by
simp only [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, map_id, OrderHom.coe_mk, OrderHom.id_coe, id,
comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, ←
RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot (Ideal.Quotient.mk J), mk_ker,
sup_eq_left.mpr (dvd_iff_le.mp X.prop), Subtype.coe_eta])
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] {L : Ideal B}
theorem idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp {f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J} {g : A ⧸ J →+* B ⧸ L}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
(idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hg).comp (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom hf) =
idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom (show Function.Surjective (g.comp f) from hg.comp hf) := by
refine OrderHom.ext _ _ (funext fun x => ?_)
rw [idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.comp_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk,
OrderHom.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom, OrderHom.coe_mk,
Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, map_comap_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, map_map]
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (f : R ⧸ I ≃+* A ⧸ J)
/-- The bijection between ideals of `R` dividing `I` and the ideals of `A` dividing `J` induced by
an isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
def idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I } ≃o { p : Ideal A | p ∣ J } := by
have f_surj : Function.Surjective (f : R ⧸ I →+* A ⧸ J) := f.surjective
have fsym_surj : Function.Surjective (f.symm : A ⧸ J →+* R ⧸ I) := f.symm.surjective
refine OrderIso.ofHomInv (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom f_surj) (idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom fsym_surj)
?_ ?_
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp fsym_surj f_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.comp_symm, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
· have := idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_comp f_surj fsym_surj
simp only [RingEquiv.symm_comp, idealFactorsFunOfQuotHom_id] at this
rw [← this, OrderHom.coe_eq, OrderHom.coe_eq]
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm = idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm := rfl
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso {L M : Ideal R} (hL : L ∣ I) (hM : M ∣ I) :
(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ : Ideal A) ∣ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ↔
L ∣ M := by
suffices
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨M, hM⟩ ≤ idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, hL⟩ ↔
(⟨M, hM⟩ : { p : Ideal R | p ∣ I }) ≤ ⟨L, hL⟩
by rw [dvd_iff_le, dvd_iff_le, Subtype.coe_le_coe, this, Subtype.mk_le_mk]
exact (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).le_iff_le
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
{L : Ideal R} (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
↑(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨L, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hL⟩)
∈ normalizedFactors J := by
have hI : I ≠ ⊥ := by
intro hI
rw [hI, bot_eq_zero, normalizedFactors_zero, ← Multiset.empty_eq_zero] at hL
exact Finset.not_mem_empty _ hL
refine mem_normalizedFactors_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
rintro ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f
/-- The bijection between the sets of normalized factors of I and J induced by a ring
isomorphism `f : R/I ≅ A/J`. -/
def normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
{ L : Ideal R | L ∈ normalizedFactors I } ≃ { M : Ideal A | M ∈ normalizedFactors J } where
toFun j :=
⟨idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩,
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f hJ j.prop⟩
invFun j :=
⟨(idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).symm ⟨↑j, dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors j.prop⟩, by
rw [idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm]
exact
idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors f.symm hI
j.prop⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => by simp [-Set.coe_setOf]
@[simp]
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_symm (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ).symm =
normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f.symm hJ hI := rfl
/-- The map `normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv` preserves multiplicities. -/
theorem normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (hJ : J ≠ ⊥)
(L : Ideal R) (hL : L ∈ normalizedFactors I) :
emultiplicity (↑(normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f hI hJ ⟨L, hL⟩)) J = emultiplicity L I := by
rw [normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine emultiplicity_factor_dvd_iso_eq_emultiplicity_of_mem_normalizedFactors hI hJ hL
(d := (idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv f).toEquiv) ?_
exact fun ⟨l, hl⟩ ⟨l', hl'⟩ => idealFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv_is_dvd_iso f hl hl'
end
section ChineseRemainder
open Ideal UniqueFactorizationMonoid
variable {R}
theorem Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq [Ring.DimensionLEOne R] {P Q : Ideal R}
[hP : P.IsPrime] [hQ : Q.IsPrime] (hP0 : P ≠ ⊥) : P ≤ Q ↔ P = Q :=
⟨(hP.isMaximal hP0).eq_of_le hQ.ne_top, Eq.le⟩
theorem Ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge {I J : Ideal R} (h : ∀ P, I ≤ P → J ≤ P → ¬IsPrime P) :
IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
by_contra hIJ
obtain ⟨P, hP, hIJ⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_maximal _ hIJ
exact h P (le_trans le_sup_left hIJ) (le_trans le_sup_right hIJ) hP.isPrime
section DedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain R]
theorem Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow (I : Ideal R) [hI : I.IsPrime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I ^ n) : a ∈ I ∨ b ∈ I ^ n := by
cases n; · simp
by_cases hI0 : I = ⊥; · simpa [pow_succ, hI0] using h
simp only [← Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at h ⊢
by_cases ha : I ∣ span {a}
· exact Or.inl ha
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact Or.inr (Prime.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ((Ideal.prime_iff_isPrime hI0).mpr hI) _ ha h)
theorem Ideal.IsPrime.mem_pow_mul (I : Ideal R) [hI : I.IsPrime] {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : a * b ∈ I ^ n) : a ∈ I ^ n ∨ b ∈ I := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
rw [or_comm]
exact Ideal.IsPrime.mul_mem_pow _ h
section
theorem Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq {p x : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (hle : x ≤ p ^ n)
[DecidableEq (Ideal R)] (hlt : ¬x ≤ p ^ (n + 1)) : (normalizedFactors x).count p = n :=
count_normalizedFactors_eq' ((Ideal.isPrime_iff_bot_or_prime.mp hp).imp_right Prime.irreducible)
(normalize_eq _) (Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr hle) (mt Ideal.le_of_dvd hlt)
/-- The number of times an ideal `I` occurs as normalized factor of another ideal `J` is stable
when regarding these ideals as associated elements of the monoid of ideals. -/
theorem count_associates_factors_eq [DecidableEq (Ideal R)] [DecidableEq <| Associates (Ideal R)]
[∀ (p : Associates <| Ideal R), Decidable (Irreducible p)]
{I J : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J.IsPrime) (hJ₀ : J ≠ ⊥) :
(Associates.mk J).count (Associates.mk I).factors = Multiset.count J (normalizedFactors I) := by
replace hI : Associates.mk I ≠ 0 := Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
have hJ' : Irreducible (Associates.mk J) := by
simpa only [Associates.irreducible_mk] using (Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hJ₀ hJ).irreducible
apply (Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq (p := J) (x := I) _ _).symm
all_goals
rw [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le, ← Associates.mk_dvd_mk, Associates.mk_pow]
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le]
rw [Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le hI hJ']
omega
end
theorem Ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors {I J K : Ideal R}
(coprime : ∀ P, J ≤ P → K ≤ P → ¬IsPrime P) (hJ : I ≤ J) (hK : I ≤ K) : I ≤ J * K := by
simp only [← Ideal.dvd_iff_le] at coprime hJ hK ⊢
by_cases hJ0 : J = 0
· simpa only [hJ0, zero_mul] using hJ
obtain ⟨I', rfl⟩ := hK
rw [mul_comm]
refine mul_dvd_mul_left K
(UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors (b := K) hJ0 ?_ hJ)
exact fun hPJ hPK => mt Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (coprime _ hPJ hPK)
/-- The intersection of distinct prime powers in a Dedekind domain is the product of these
prime powers. -/
theorem IsDedekindDomain.inf_prime_pow_eq_prod {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R)
(e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (f i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → f i ≠ f j) :
(s.inf fun i => f i ^ e i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ e i := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
revert prime coprime
refine s.induction ?_ ?_
· simp
intro a s ha ih prime coprime
specialize
ih (fun i hi => prime i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi j hj =>
coprime i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)
rw [Finset.inf_insert, Finset.prod_insert ha, ih]
refine le_antisymm (Ideal.le_mul_of_no_prime_factors ?_ inf_le_left inf_le_right) Ideal.mul_le_inf
intro P hPa hPs hPp
obtain ⟨b, hb, hPb⟩ := hPp.prod_le.mp hPs
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s))
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb))
refine coprime a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s) b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb) ?_ ?_
· exact (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha).symm
· refine ((Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq ?_).mp (hPp.le_of_pow_le hPa)).trans
((Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq ?_).mp (hPp.le_of_pow_le hPb)).symm
· exact (prime a (Finset.mem_insert_self a s)).ne_zero
· exact (prime b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb)).ne_zero
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: if the ideal `I` factors as
`∏ i, P i ^ e i`, then `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`. -/
noncomputable def IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (I : Ideal R)
(P : ι → Ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i, Prime (P i))
(coprime : Pairwise fun i j => P i ≠ P j)
(prod_eq : ∏ i, P i ^ e i = I) : R ⧸ I ≃+* ∀ i, R ⧸ P i ^ e i :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq
(by
simp only [← prod_eq, Finset.inf_eq_iInf, Finset.mem_univ, ciInf_pos,
← IsDedekindDomain.inf_prime_pow_eq_prod _ _ _ (fun i _ => prime i)
(coprime.set_pairwise _)])).trans <|
Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient _ fun i j hij => Ideal.coprime_of_no_prime_ge <| by
intro P hPi hPj hPp
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime i)
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (prime j)
exact coprime hij <| ((Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (prime i).ne_zero).mp
(hPp.le_of_pow_le hPi)).trans <| Eq.symm <|
(Ring.DimensionLeOne.prime_le_prime_iff_eq (prime j).ne_zero).mp (hPp.le_of_pow_le hPj)
open scoped Classical in
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π i, R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`,
where `P i` ranges over the prime factors of `I` and `e i` over the multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiFactors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
R ⧸ I ≃+* ∀ P : (factors I).toFinset, R ⧸ (P : Ideal R) ^ (Multiset.count ↑P (factors I)) :=
IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq _ _ _
(fun P : (factors I).toFinset => prime_of_factor _ (Multiset.mem_toFinset.mp P.prop))
(fun _ _ hij => Subtype.coe_injective.ne hij)
(calc
(∏ P : (factors I).toFinset, (P : Ideal R) ^ (factors I).count (P : Ideal R)) =
∏ P ∈ (factors I).toFinset, P ^ (factors I).count P :=
(factors I).toFinset.prod_coe_sort fun P => P ^ (factors I).count P
_ = ((factors I).map fun P => P).prod := (Finset.prod_multiset_map_count (factors I) id).symm
_ = (factors I).prod := by rw [Multiset.map_id']
_ = I := associated_iff_eq.mp (factors_prod hI)
)
@[simp]
theorem IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiFactors_mk {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) (x : R) :
IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiFactors hI (Ideal.Quotient.mk I x) = fun _P =>
Ideal.Quotient.mk _ x := rfl
/-- **Chinese remainder theorem** for a Dedekind domain: if the ideal `I` factors as
`∏ i ∈ s, P i ^ e i`, then `R ⧸ I` factors as `Π (i : s), R ⧸ (P i ^ e i)`.
This is a version of `IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq` where we restrict
the product to a finite subset `s` of a potentially infinite indexing type `ι`.
-/
noncomputable def IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfFinsetProdEq {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι}
(I : Ideal R) (P : ι → Ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (P i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j)
(prod_eq : ∏ i ∈ s, P i ^ e i = I) : R ⧸ I ≃+* ∀ i : s, R ⧸ P i ^ e i :=
IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfProdEq I (fun i : s => P i) (fun i : s => e i)
(fun i => prime i i.2) (fun i j h => coprime i i.2 j j.2 (Subtype.coe_injective.ne h))
(_root_.trans (Finset.prod_coe_sort s fun i => P i ^ e i) prod_eq)
/-- Corollary of the Chinese remainder theorem: given elements `x i : R / P i ^ e i`,
we can choose a representative `y : R` such that `y ≡ x i (mod P i ^ e i)`. -/
theorem IsDedekindDomain.exists_representative_mod_finset {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι}
(P : ι → Ideal R) (e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (P i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j) (x : ∀ i : s, R ⧸ P i ^ e i) :
∃ y, ∀ (i) (hi : i ∈ s), Ideal.Quotient.mk (P i ^ e i) y = x ⟨i, hi⟩ := by
let f := IsDedekindDomain.quotientEquivPiOfFinsetProdEq _ P e prime coprime rfl
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := f.surjective x
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y
exact ⟨z, fun i _hi => rfl⟩
/-- Corollary of the Chinese remainder theorem: given elements `x i : R`,
we can choose a representative `y : R` such that `y - x i ∈ P i ^ e i`. -/
theorem IsDedekindDomain.exists_forall_sub_mem_ideal {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} (P : ι → Ideal R)
(e : ι → ℕ) (prime : ∀ i ∈ s, Prime (P i))
(coprime : ∀ᵉ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ s), i ≠ j → P i ≠ P j) (x : s → R) :
∃ y, ∀ (i) (hi : i ∈ s), y - x ⟨i, hi⟩ ∈ P i ^ e i := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ :=
IsDedekindDomain.exists_representative_mod_finset P e prime coprime fun i =>
Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (x i)
exact ⟨y, fun i hi => Ideal.Quotient.eq.mp (hy i hi)⟩
end DedekindDomain
end ChineseRemainder
section PID
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
variable {R}
variable [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
theorem span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd {a b : R} :
Ideal.span {a} ∣ Ideal.span ({b} : Set R) ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨fun h => mem_span_singleton.mp (dvd_iff_le.mp h (mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl b))), fun h =>
dvd_iff_le.mpr fun _d hd => mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_trans h (mem_span_singleton.mp hd))⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.squarefree_span_singleton {a : R} :
Squarefree (span {a}) ↔ Squarefree a := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h I hI ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd, ← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton] at hx
simpa using h _ hx
· rw [← span_singleton_generator I, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton,
span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd] at hI
exact isUnit_iff.mpr <| eq_top_of_isUnit_mem _ (Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator_mem I) (h _ hI)
theorem singleton_span_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors [NormalizationMonoid R]
{a b : R} (ha : a ∈ normalizedFactors b) :
Ideal.span ({a} : Set R) ∈ normalizedFactors (Ideal.span ({b} : Set R)) := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· rw [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mpr hb, bot_eq_zero, normalizedFactors_zero]
rw [hb, normalizedFactors_zero] at ha
exact absurd ha (Multiset.not_mem_zero a)
· suffices Prime (Ideal.span ({a} : Set R)) by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := exists_mem_normalizedFactors_of_dvd ?_ this.irreducible
(dvd_iff_le.mpr (span_singleton_le_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors ha)))
rwa [associated_iff_eq.mp hc']
· by_contra h
exact hb (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h)
rw [prime_iff_isPrime]
· exact (span_singleton_prime (prime_of_normalized_factor a ha).ne_zero).mpr
(prime_of_normalized_factor a ha)
· by_contra h
exact (prime_of_normalized_factor a ha).ne_zero (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_span {a b : R} :
emultiplicity (Ideal.span {a}) (Ideal.span ({b} : Set R)) = emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases h : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· rw [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd <;>
rw [Ideal.span_singleton_pow, span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd]
· exact pow_multiplicity_dvd a b
· apply h.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
apply lt_add_one
· suffices ¬FiniteMultiplicity (Ideal.span ({a} : Set R)) (Ideal.span ({b} : Set R)) by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 this]
exact FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mpr fun n => by
rw [Ideal.span_singleton_pow, span_singleton_dvd_span_singleton_iff_dvd]
exact FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp h n
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
/-- The bijection between the (normalized) prime factors of `r` and the (normalized) prime factors
of `span {r}` -/
noncomputable def normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
{ d : R | d ∈ normalizedFactors r } ≃
{ I : Ideal R | I ∈ normalizedFactors (Ideal.span ({r} : Set R)) } := by
refine Equiv.ofBijective ?_ ?_
· exact fun d =>
⟨Ideal.span {↑d}, singleton_span_mem_normalizedFactors_of_mem_normalizedFactors d.prop⟩
· refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h
rw [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, Subtype.coe_mk,
Subtype.coe_mk] at h
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mpr (mem_normalizedFactors_eq_of_associated ha hb h)
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
have : i.IsPrime := isPrime_of_prime (prime_of_normalized_factor i hi)
have := exists_mem_normalizedFactors_of_dvd hr
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.prime_generator_of_isPrime i
(prime_of_normalized_factor i hi).ne_zero).irreducible ?_
· obtain ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := this
use ⟨a, ha⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← span_singleton_eq_span_singleton.mpr ha',
Ideal.span_singleton_generator]
· exact (Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd i).mp
((show Ideal.span {r} ≤ i from dvd_iff_le.mp (dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hi))
(mem_span_singleton.mpr (dvd_refl r)))
/-- The bijection `normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors` between the set of prime
factors of `r` and the set of prime factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` preserves multiplicities. See
`count_normalizedFactorsSpan_eq_count` for the version stated in terms of multisets `count`. -/
theorem emultiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_eq_emultiplicity {r d : R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (hd : d ∈ normalizedFactors r) :
emultiplicity d r =
emultiplicity (normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors hr ⟨d, hd⟩ : Ideal R)
(Ideal.span {r}) := by
simp only [normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors, emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_span,
Subtype.coe_mk, Equiv.ofBijective_apply]
/-- The bijection `normalized_factors_equiv_span_normalized_factors.symm` between the set of prime
factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` and the set of prime factors of `r` preserves multiplicities. -/
theorem emultiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_symm_eq_emultiplicity {r : R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (I : { I : Ideal R | I ∈ normalizedFactors (Ideal.span ({r} : Set R)) }) :
emultiplicity ((normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors hr).symm I : R) r =
emultiplicity (I : Ideal R) (Ideal.span {r}) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors hr).surjective I
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := x
rw [hx.symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, Subtype.coe_mk,
emultiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_eq_emultiplicity hr ha]
variable [DecidableEq R] [DecidableEq (Ideal R)]
/-- The bijection between the set of prime factors of the ideal `⟨r⟩` and the set of prime factors
of `r` preserves `count` of the corresponding multisets. See
`multiplicity_normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors_eq_multiplicity` for the version
stated in terms of multiplicity. -/
theorem count_span_normalizedFactors_eq {r X : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) (hX : Prime X) :
Multiset.count (Ideal.span {X} : Ideal R) (normalizedFactors (Ideal.span {r})) =
Multiset.count (normalize X) (normalizedFactors r) := by
have := emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_span (R := R) (a := X) (b := r)
rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors (Prime.irreducible hX) hr,
emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors (Prime.irreducible ?_), normalize_apply,
normUnit_eq_one, Units.val_one, one_eq_top, mul_top, Nat.cast_inj] at this
· simp only [normalize_apply, this]
· simp only [Submodule.zero_eq_bot, ne_eq, span_singleton_eq_bot, hr, not_false_eq_true]
· simpa only [prime_span_singleton_iff]
theorem count_span_normalizedFactors_eq_of_normUnit {r X : R}
(hr : r ≠ 0) (hX₁ : normUnit X = 1) (hX : Prime X) :
Multiset.count (Ideal.span {X} : Ideal R) (normalizedFactors (Ideal.span {r})) =
Multiset.count X (normalizedFactors r) := by
simpa [hX₁, normalize_apply] using count_span_normalizedFactors_eq hr hX
end NormalizationMonoid
end PID
section primesOverFinset
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The finite set of all prime factors of the pushforward of `p`. -/
noncomputable abbrev primesOverFinset {A : Type*} [CommRing A] (p : Ideal A) (B : Type*)
[CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] [Algebra A B] : Finset (Ideal B) :=
(factors (p.map (algebraMap A B))).toFinset
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] {p : Ideal A} (hpb : p ≠ ⊥) [hpm : p.IsMaximal]
(B : Type*) [CommRing B] [IsDedekindDomain B] [Algebra A B] [NoZeroSMulDivisors A B]
include hpb in
theorem coe_primesOverFinset : primesOverFinset p B = primesOver p B := by
classical
ext P
rw [primesOverFinset, factors_eq_normalizedFactors, Finset.mem_coe, Multiset.mem_toFinset]
exact (P.mem_normalizedFactors_iff (map_ne_bot_of_ne_bot hpb)).trans <| Iff.intro
(fun ⟨hPp, h⟩ => ⟨hPp, ⟨hpm.eq_of_le (comap_ne_top _ hPp.ne_top) (le_comap_of_map_le h)⟩⟩)
(fun ⟨hPp, h⟩ => ⟨hPp, map_le_of_le_comap h.1.le⟩)
variable (p) [Algebra.IsIntegral A B]
theorem primesOver_finite : (primesOver p B).Finite := by
by_cases hpb : p = ⊥
· rw [hpb] at hpm ⊢
haveI : IsDomain A := IsDomain.of_bot_isPrime A
rw [primesOver_bot A B]
exact Set.finite_singleton ⊥
· rw [← coe_primesOverFinset hpb B]
exact (primesOverFinset p B).finite_toSet
theorem primesOver_ncard_ne_zero : (primesOver p B).ncard ≠ 0 := by
rcases exists_ideal_liesOver_maximal_of_isIntegral p B with ⟨P, hPm, hp⟩
exact Set.ncard_ne_zero_of_mem ⟨hPm.isPrime, hp⟩ (primesOver_finite p B)
theorem one_le_primesOver_ncard : 1 ≤ (primesOver p B).ncard :=
Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr (primesOver_ncard_ne_zero p B)
end primesOverFinset
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 1,536 | 1,543 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Newell Jensen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Newell Jensen, Mitchell Lee, Óscar Álvarez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Matrix
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PresentedGroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.DivMod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
/-!
# Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems
This file defines Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems.
Let `B` be a (possibly infinite) type, and let $M = (M_{i,i'})_{i, i' \in B}$ be a matrix
of natural numbers. Further assume that $M$ is a *Coxeter matrix* (`CoxeterMatrix`); that is, $M$ is
symmetric and $M_{i,i'} = 1$ if and only if $i = i'$. The *Coxeter group* associated to $M$
(`CoxeterMatrix.group`) has the presentation
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$
The elements $s_i$ are called the *simple reflections* (`CoxeterMatrix.simple`) of the Coxeter
group. Note that every simple reflection is an involution.
A *Coxeter system* (`CoxeterSystem`) is a group $W$, together with an isomorphism between $W$ and
the Coxeter group associated to some Coxeter matrix $M$. By abuse of language, we also say that $W$
is a Coxeter group (`IsCoxeterGroup`), and we may speak of the simple reflections $s_i \in W$
(`CoxeterSystem.simple`). We state all of our results about Coxeter groups in terms of Coxeter
systems where possible.
Let $W$ be a group equipped with a Coxeter system. For all monoids $G$ and all functions
$f \colon B \to G$ whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations, we may lift $f$ to a multiplicative
homomorphism $W \to G$ (`CoxeterSystem.lift`) in a unique way.
A *word* is a sequence of elements of $B$. The word $(i_1, \ldots, i_\ell)$ has a corresponding
product $s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell} \in W$ (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd`). Every element of $W$ is the
product of some word (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd_surjective`). The words that alternate between two
elements of $B$ (`CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`) are particularly important.
## Implementation details
Much of the literature on Coxeter groups conflates the set $S = \{s_i : i \in B\} \subseteq W$ of
simple reflections with the set $B$ that indexes the simple reflections. This is usually permissible
because the simple reflections $s_i$ of any Coxeter group are all distinct (a nontrivial fact that
we do not prove in this file). In contrast, we try not to refer to the set $S$ of simple
reflections unless necessary; instead, we state our results in terms of $B$ wherever possible.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterMatrix.Group`
* `CoxeterSystem`
* `IsCoxeterGroup`
* `CoxeterSystem.simple` : If `cs` is a Coxeter system on the group `W`, then `cs.simple i` is the
simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.lift` : Extend a function `f : B → G` to a monoid homomorphism `f' : W → G`
satisfying `f' (cs.simple i) = f i` for all `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.wordProd`
* `CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 4--6*](bourbaki1968) chapter IV
pages 4--5, 13--15
* [J. Baez, *Coxeter and Dynkin Diagrams*](https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/twf_dynkin.pdf)
## TODO
* The simple reflections of a Coxeter system are distinct.
* Introduce some ways to actually construct some Coxeter groups. For example, given a Coxeter matrix
$M : B \times B \to \mathbb{N}$, a real vector space $V$, a basis $\{\alpha_i : i \in B\}$
and a bilinear form $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \colon V \times V \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying
$$\langle \alpha_i, \alpha_{i'}\rangle = - \cos(\pi / M_{i,i'}),$$ one can form the subgroup of
$GL(V)$ generated by the reflections in the $\alpha_i$, and it is a Coxeter group. We can use this
to combinatorially describe the Coxeter groups of type $A$, $B$, $D$, and $I$.
* State and prove Matsumoto's theorem.
* Classify the finite Coxeter groups.
## Tags
coxeter system, coxeter group
-/
open Function Set List
/-! ### Coxeter groups -/
namespace CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (e : B ≃ B')
/-- The Coxeter relation associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$ and two indices $i, i' \in B$.
That is, the relation $(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}$, considered as an element of the free group
on $\{s_i\}_{i \in B}$.
If $M_{i, i'} = 0$, then this is the identity, indicating that there is no relation between
$s_i$ and $s_{i'}$. -/
def relation (i i' : B) : FreeGroup B := (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i'
/-- The set of all Coxeter relations associated to the Coxeter matrix $M$. -/
def relationsSet : Set (FreeGroup B) := range <| uncurry M.relation
/-- The Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$; that is, the group
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$ -/
protected def Group : Type _ := PresentedGroup M.relationsSet
instance : Group M.Group := QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _
/-- The simple reflection of the Coxeter group `M.group` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : M.Group := PresentedGroup.of i
theorem reindex_relationsSet :
(M.reindex e).relationsSet =
FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e '' M.relationsSet := let M' := M.reindex e; calc
Set.range (uncurry M'.relation)
_ = Set.range (uncurry M'.relation ∘ Prod.map e e) := by simp [Set.range_comp]
_ = Set.range (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e ∘ uncurry M.relation) := by
apply congrArg Set.range
ext ⟨i, i'⟩
simp [relation, reindex_apply, M']
_ = _ := by simp [Set.range_comp, relationsSet]
/-- The isomorphism between the Coxeter group associated to the reindexed matrix `M.reindex e` and
the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def reindexGroupEquiv : (M.reindex e).Group ≃* M.Group :=
.symm <| QuotientGroup.congr
(Subgroup.normalClosure M.relationsSet)
(Subgroup.normalClosure (M.reindex e).relationsSet)
(FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e)
(by
rw [reindex_relationsSet,
Subgroup.map_normalClosure _ _ (by simpa using (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e).surjective),
MonoidHom.coe_coe])
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_apply_simple (i : B') :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e) ((M.reindex e).simple i) = M.simple (e.symm i) := rfl
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_symm_apply_simple (i : B) :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm (M.simple i) = (M.reindex e).simple (e i) := rfl
end CoxeterMatrix
/-! ### Coxeter systems -/
section
variable {B : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B)
/-- A Coxeter system `CoxeterSystem M W` is a structure recording the isomorphism between
a group `W` and the Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
@[ext]
structure CoxeterSystem (W : Type*) [Group W] where
/-- The isomorphism between `W` and the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
mulEquiv : W ≃* M.Group
/-- A group is a Coxeter group if it admits a Coxeter system for some Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
class IsCoxeterGroup.{u} (W : Type u) [Group W] : Prop where
nonempty_system : ∃ B : Type u, ∃ M : CoxeterMatrix B, Nonempty (CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- The canonical Coxeter system on the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem : CoxeterSystem M M.Group := ⟨.refl _⟩
end
namespace CoxeterSystem
open CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (e : B ≃ B')
variable {W H : Type*} [Group W] [Group H]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- Reindex a Coxeter system through a bijection of the indexing sets. -/
@[simps]
protected def reindex (e : B ≃ B') : CoxeterSystem (M.reindex e) W :=
⟨cs.mulEquiv.trans (M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm⟩
/-- Push a Coxeter system through a group isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (e : W ≃* H) : CoxeterSystem M H := ⟨e.symm.trans cs.mulEquiv⟩
/-! ### Simple reflections -/
/-- The simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : W := cs.mulEquiv.symm (PresentedGroup.of i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem_simple (M : CoxeterMatrix B) :
M.toCoxeterSystem.simple = M.simple := rfl
@[simp] theorem reindex_simple (i' : B') : (cs.reindex e).simple i' = cs.simple (e.symm i') := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_simple (e : W ≃* H) (i : B) : (cs.map e).simple i = e (cs.simple i) := rfl
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_self (i : B) : s i * s i = 1 := by
have : (FreeGroup.of i) * (FreeGroup.of i) ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i), by simp [relation]⟩
have : (PresentedGroup.mk _ (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i) : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
| unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, PresentedGroup.of, map_mul]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean | 204 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
| have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 518 | 523 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts.
Binary biproducts are defined in `CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryBiproducts`.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
For results about biproducts in preadditive categories see
`CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`.
For biproducts indexed by a `Fintype J`, a `bicone` consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
## Implementation notes
Prior to https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/14046,
`HasFiniteBiproducts` required a `DecidableEq` instance on the indexing type.
As this had no pay-off (everything about limits is non-constructive in mathlib),
and occasional cost
(constructing decidability instances appropriate for constructions involving the indexing type),
we made everything classical.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory Functor
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J : Type w}
universe uC' uC uD' uD
variable {C : Type uC} [Category.{uC'} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
open scoped Classical in
/-- A `c : Bicone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* morphisms `π j : pt ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ pt` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
structure Bicone (F : J → C) where
pt : C
π : ∀ j, pt ⟶ F j
ι : ∀ j, F j ⟶ pt
ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' =
if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congrArg F h) else 0 := by aesop
attribute [inherit_doc Bicone] Bicone.pt Bicone.π Bicone.ι Bicone.ι_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) := by
simpa using B.ι_π j j
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') : B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 := by
simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
variable {F : J → C}
/-- A bicone morphism between two bicones for the same diagram is a morphism of the bicone points
which commutes with the cone and cocone legs. -/
structure BiconeMorphism {F : J → C} (A B : Bicone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the bicones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wπ : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π j = A.π j := by aesop_cat
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wι : ∀ j : J, A.ι j ≫ hom = B.ι j := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wι BiconeMorphism.wπ
/-- The category of bicones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Bicone.category : Category (Bicone F) where
Hom A B := BiconeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the `hom` field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
theorem BiconeMorphism.ext {c c' : Bicone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
congr
namespace Bicones
/-- To give an isomorphism between cocones, it suffices to give an
isomorphism between their vertices which commutes with the cocone
maps. -/
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory]), simps]
def ext {c c' : Bicone F} (φ : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(wι : ∀ j, c.ι j ≫ φ.hom = c'.ι j := by aesop_cat)
(wπ : ∀ j, φ.hom ≫ c'.π j = c.π j := by aesop_cat) : c ≅ c' where
hom := { hom := φ.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := φ.inv
wι := fun j => φ.comp_inv_eq.mpr (wι j).symm
wπ := fun j => φ.inv_comp_eq.mpr (wπ j).symm }
variable (F) in
/-- A functor `G : C ⥤ D` sends bicones over `F` to bicones over `G.obj ∘ F` functorially. -/
@[simps]
def functoriality (G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G] :
Bicone F ⥤ Bicone (G.obj ∘ F) where
obj A :=
{ pt := G.obj A.pt
π := fun j => G.map (A.π j)
ι := fun j => G.map (A.ι j)
ι_π := fun i j => (Functor.map_comp _ _ _).symm.trans <| by
rw [A.ι_π]
aesop_cat }
map f :=
{ hom := G.map f.hom
wπ := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wπ, ← f.wπ j]
wι := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wι, ← f.wι j] }
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
instance functoriality_full [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Full] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Full where
map_surjective t :=
⟨{ hom := G.preimage t.hom
wι := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wι j)
wπ := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wπ j) }, by aesop_cat⟩
instance functoriality_faithful [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Faithful where
map_injective {_X} {_Y} f g h :=
BiconeMorphism.ext f g <| G.map_injective <| congr_arg BiconeMorphism.hom h
end Bicones
namespace Bicone
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
def toConeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, π := { app := fun j => B.π j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wπ _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toConeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCone (B : Bicone F) : Cone (Discrete.functor F) := toConeFunctor.obj B
-- TODO Consider changing this API to `toFan (B : Bicone F) : Fan F`.
@[simp] theorem toCone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_π_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCone.π.app j = B.π j.as := rfl
theorem toCone_π_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ = B.π j := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCone_proj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Fan.proj B.toCone j = B.π j := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
def toCoconeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cocone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, ι := { app := fun j => B.ι j.as } }
map {_ _} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wι _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toCoconeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCocone (B : Bicone F) : Cocone (Discrete.functor F) := toCoconeFunctor.obj B
@[simp] theorem toCocone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCocone.pt = B.pt := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_ι_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCocone.ι.app j = B.ι j.as := rfl
@[simp] theorem toCocone_inj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Cofan.inj B.toCocone j = B.ι j := rfl
theorem toCocone_ι_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCocone.ι.app ⟨j⟩ = B.ι j := rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofLimitCone {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsLimit t) : Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := t.π.app ⟨j⟩
ι j := ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem ι_of_isLimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
open scoped Classical in
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofColimitCocone {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι j := t.ι.app ⟨j⟩
ι_π j j' := by simp
open scoped Classical in
theorem π_of_isColimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure IsBilimit {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) where
isLimit : IsLimit B.toCone
isColimit : IsColimit B.toCocone
attribute [inherit_doc IsBilimit] IsBilimit.isLimit IsBilimit.isColimit
attribute [simp] IsBilimit.mk.injEq
attribute [local ext] Bicone.IsBilimit
instance subsingleton_isBilimit {f : J → C} {c : Bicone f} : Subsingleton c.IsBilimit :=
⟨fun _ _ => Bicone.IsBilimit.ext (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
section Whisker
variable {K : Type w'}
/-- Whisker a bicone with an equivalence between the indexing types. -/
@[simps]
def whisker {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) : Bicone (f ∘ g) where
pt := c.pt
π k := c.π (g k)
ι k := c.ι (g k)
ι_π k k' := by
simp only [c.ι_π]
split_ifs with h h' h' <;> simp [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq g] at h h' <;> tauto
/-- Taking the cone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cone and postcomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCone ≅
(Cones.postcompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).inv).obj
(c.toCone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Taking the cocone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cocone and precomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCocone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCocone ≅
(Cocones.precompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).hom).obj
(c.toCocone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- Whiskering a bicone with an equivalence between types preserves being a bilimit bicone. -/
noncomputable def whiskerIsBilimitIff {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).IsBilimit ≃ c.IsBilimit := by
refine equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩) fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· let this := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc.isLimit (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g)
let this := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _) this
exact IsLimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· let this := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc.isColimit (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g)
let this := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _) this
exact IsColimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g).symm
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _).symm _
exact IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isLimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
· apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g).symm
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _).symm _
exact IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isColimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
end Whisker
end Bicone
/-- A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
structure LimitBicone (F : J → C) where
bicone : Bicone F
isBilimit : bicone.IsBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc LimitBicone] LimitBicone.bicone LimitBicone.isBilimit
/-- `HasBiproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`. -/
class HasBiproduct (F : J → C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_biproduct : Nonempty (LimitBicone F)
attribute [inherit_doc HasBiproduct] HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
theorem HasBiproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : LimitBicone F) : HasBiproduct F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `BiproductData F` from `HasBiproduct F`. -/
def getBiproductData (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : LimitBicone F :=
Classical.choice HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Bicone F :=
(getBiproductData F).bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.isBilimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).IsBilimit :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.isLimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsLimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isLimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.isColimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsColimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasProduct F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCone
isLimit := biproduct.isLimit F }
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasCoproduct F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone
isColimit := biproduct.isColimit F }
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`. -/
class HasBiproductsOfShape : Prop where
has_biproduct : ∀ F : J → C, HasBiproduct F
attribute [instance 100] HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct
/-- `HasFiniteBiproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type. -/
class HasFiniteBiproducts : Prop where
out : ∀ n, HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C
attribute [inherit_doc HasFiniteBiproducts] HasFiniteBiproducts.out
variable {J}
theorem hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv {K : Type w'} [HasBiproductsOfShape K C] (e : J ≃ K) :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C :=
⟨fun F =>
let ⟨⟨h⟩⟩ := HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct (F ∘ e.symm)
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
HasBiproduct.mk <| by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm_apply_apply] using
LimitBicone.mk (c.whisker e) ((c.whiskerIsBilimitIff _).2 hc)⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproductsOfShape_finite [HasFiniteBiproducts C] [Finite J] :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin J with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
haveI : HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C := HasFiniteBiproducts.out n
exact hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv C e
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteProducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteCoproducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor⟩
instance (priority := 100) hasProductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasProductsOfShape J C where
has_limit _ := hasLimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproductsOfShape_of_hasBiproductsOfShape [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
HasCoproductsOfShape J C where
has_colimit _ := hasColimit_of_iso Discrete.natIsoFunctor
variable {C}
/-- The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit. -/
def biproductIso (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Limits.piObj F ≅ Limits.sigmaObj F :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (biproduct.isLimit F)).trans <|
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit _)
variable {J : Type w} {K : Type*}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbrev biproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).pt
@[inherit_doc biproduct]
notation "⨁ " f:20 => biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
/-- Note that as this lemma has an `if` in the statement, we include a `DecidableEq` argument.
This means you may not be able to `simp` using this lemma unless you `open scoped Classical`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_π [DecidableEq J] (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0 := by
convert (biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both versions proven by simp
theorem biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ := by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 := by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.eqToHom_comp_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ biproduct.ι f j' = biproduct.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.π_comp_eqToHom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
biproduct.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = biproduct.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.lift {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).lift (Fan.mk P p)
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).desc (Cofan.mk P p)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j := (biproduct.isLimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j := (biproduct.isColimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbrev biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsLimit.map (biproduct.bicone f).toCone (biproduct.isLimit g)
(Discrete.natTrans (fun j => p j.as))
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbrev biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsColimit.map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as)
-- We put this at slightly higher priority than `biproduct.hom_ext'`,
-- to get the matrix indices in the "right" order.
@[ext 1001]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
@[ext]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen product. -/
def biproduct.isoProduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∏ᶜ f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit f) (limit.isLimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).hom = Pi.lift (biproduct.π f) :=
limit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoProduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).inv = biproduct.lift (Pi.π f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen coproduct. -/
def biproduct.isoCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∐ f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit f) (colimit.isColimit _)
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).inv = Sigma.desc (biproduct.ι f) :=
colimit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoCoproduct]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).hom = biproduct.desc (Sigma.ι f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ fun j => by simp [← Iso.eq_comp_inv]
/-- If a category has biproducts of a shape `J`, its `colim` and `lim` functor on diagrams over `J`
are isomorphic. -/
@[simps!]
def HasBiproductsOfShape.colimIsoLim [HasBiproductsOfShape J C] :
colim (J := Discrete J) (C := C) ≅ lim :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun F => (Sigma.isoColimit F).symm ≪≫
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).symm ≪≫ biproduct.isoProduct _ ≪≫ Pi.isoLimit F)
fun η => colimit.hom_ext fun ⟨i⟩ => limit.hom_ext fun ⟨j⟩ => by
classical
by_cases h : i = j <;>
simp_all [h, Sigma.isoColimit, Pi.isoLimit, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc]
theorem biproduct.map_eq_map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
biproduct.map p = biproduct.map' p := by
classical
ext
dsimp
simp only [Discrete.natTrans_app, Limits.IsColimit.ι_map_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.map_π,
Category.assoc, ← Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk, ← biproduct.bicone_π, ← Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk,
← biproduct.bicone_ι]
dsimp
rw [biproduct.ι_π_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_π {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.π g j = biproduct.π f j ≫ p j :=
Limits.IsLimit.map_π _ _ _ (Discrete.mk j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.map p = p j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
rw [biproduct.map_eq_map']
apply
Limits.IsColimit.ι_map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as) (Discrete.mk j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_desc {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
{P : C} (k : ∀ j, g j ⟶ P) :
biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.desc k = biproduct.desc fun j => p j ≫ k j := by
ext; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] {P : C}
(k : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j) :
biproduct.lift k ≫ biproduct.map p = biproduct.lift fun j => k j ≫ p j := by
ext; simp
/-- Given a collection of isomorphisms between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain an isomorphism between the biproducts. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.mapIso {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) :
⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).hom
inv := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).inv
instance biproduct.map_epi {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Epi (p j)] : Epi (biproduct.map p) := by
classical
have : biproduct.map p =
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).hom ≫ Sigma.map p ≫ (biproduct.isoCoproduct _).inv := by
ext
simp only [map_π, isoCoproduct_hom, isoCoproduct_inv, Category.assoc, ι_desc_assoc,
ι_colimMap_assoc, Discrete.functor_obj_eq_as, Discrete.natTrans_app, colimit.ι_desc_assoc,
Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app, ι_π, ι_π_assoc]
split
all_goals simp_all
rw [this]
infer_instance
instance Pi.map_epi {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Epi (p j)] : Epi (Pi.map p) := by
rw [show Pi.map p = (biproduct.isoProduct _).inv ≫ biproduct.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoProduct _).hom by aesop]
infer_instance
instance biproduct.map_mono {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Mono (p j)] : Mono (biproduct.map p) := by
rw [show biproduct.map p = (biproduct.isoProduct _).hom ≫ Pi.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoProduct _).inv by aesop]
infer_instance
instance Sigma.map_mono {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
[∀ j, Mono (p j)] : Mono (Sigma.map p) := by
rw [show Sigma.map p = (biproduct.isoCoproduct _).inv ≫ biproduct.map p ≫
(biproduct.isoCoproduct _).hom by aesop]
infer_instance
/-- Two biproducts which differ by an equivalence in the indexing type,
and up to isomorphism in the factors, are isomorphic.
Unfortunately there are two natural ways to define each direction of this isomorphism
(because it is true for both products and coproducts separately).
We give the alternative definitions as lemmas below. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.whiskerEquiv {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K) (w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j)
[HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] : ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.desc fun j => (w j).inv ≫ biproduct.ι g (e j)
inv := biproduct.desc fun k => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ (w (e.symm k)).hom ≫ biproduct.ι f _
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_hom_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).hom =
biproduct.lift fun k => biproduct.π f (e.symm k) ≫ (w _).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp) := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_hom]
ext k j
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· rintro rfl
simp at h
· exact Ne.symm h
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_inv_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).inv =
biproduct.lift fun j => biproduct.π g (e j) ≫ (w j).hom := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_inv]
ext j k
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp only [ι_desc_assoc, ← eqToHom_iso_hom_naturality_assoc w (e.symm_apply_apply j).symm,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply, eqToHom_comp_ι, Category.assoc, bicone_ι_π_self, Category.comp_id,
lift_π, bicone_ι_π_self_assoc]
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· exact h
· rintro rfl
simp at h
attribute [local simp] Sigma.forall in
instance {ι} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasBiproduct (g i)] [HasBiproduct fun i => ⨁ g i] :
HasBiproduct fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2 where
exists_biproduct := Nonempty.intro
{ bicone :=
{ pt := ⨁ fun i => ⨁ g i
ι := fun X => biproduct.ι (g X.1) X.2 ≫ biproduct.ι (fun i => ⨁ g i) X.1
π := fun X => biproduct.π (fun i => ⨁ g i) X.1 ≫ biproduct.π (g X.1) X.2
ι_π := fun ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨j', y⟩ => by
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h
simp
· simp only [Sigma.mk.inj_iff, not_and] at h
by_cases w : j = j'
· cases w
simp only [heq_eq_eq, forall_true_left] at h
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h]
· simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc _ w] }
isBilimit :=
{ isLimit := mkFanLimit _
(fun s => biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.lift fun c => s.proj ⟨b, c⟩)
isColimit := mkCofanColimit _
(fun s => biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.desc fun c => s.inj ⟨b, c⟩) } }
/-- An iterated biproduct is a biproduct over a sigma type. -/
@[simps]
def biproductBiproductIso {ι} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasBiproduct (g i)] [HasBiproduct fun i => ⨁ g i] :
(⨁ fun i => ⨁ g i) ≅ (⨁ fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2) where
hom := biproduct.lift fun ⟨i, x⟩ => biproduct.π _ i ≫ biproduct.π _ x
inv := biproduct.lift fun i => biproduct.lift fun x => biproduct.π _ (⟨i, x⟩ : Σ i, f i)
section πKernel
section
variable (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f]
variable (p : J → Prop) [HasBiproduct (Subtype.restrict p f)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the biproduct over a restricted index type to the biproduct of
the full index type. -/
def biproduct.fromSubtype : ⨁ Subtype.restrict p f ⟶ ⨁ f :=
biproduct.desc fun j => biproduct.ι _ j.val
/-- The canonical morphism from a biproduct to the biproduct over a restriction of its index
type. -/
def biproduct.toSubtype : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ Subtype.restrict p f :=
biproduct.lift fun _ => biproduct.π _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_π [DecidablePred p] (j : J) :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j =
if h : p j then biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 := by
classical
ext i; dsimp
rw [biproduct.fromSubtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
by_cases h : p j
· rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show (i : J) ≠ j from fun h₂ => h (h₂ ▸ i.2)), comp_zero]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_eq_lift [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p =
biproduct.lift fun j => if h : p j then biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ (by simp)
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both version solved using simp
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j = biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) j := by
classical
ext
rw [biproduct.fromSubtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_π (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.toSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) j = biproduct.π f j :=
biproduct.lift_π _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_toSubtype [DecidablePred p] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p =
if h : p j then biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 := by
classical
ext i
rw [biproduct.toSubtype, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π]
by_cases h : p j
· rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show j ≠ i from fun h₂ => h (h₂.symm ▸ i.2)), zero_comp]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_eq_desc [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.toSubtype f p =
biproduct.desc fun j => if h : p j then biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ (by simp)
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_toSubtype_subtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p = biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) j := by
classical
ext
rw [biproduct.toSubtype, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_fromSubtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) j ≫ biproduct.fromSubtype f p = biproduct.ι f j :=
biproduct.ι_desc _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p = 𝟙 (⨁ Subtype.restrict p f) := by
refine biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => ?_
rw [Category.assoc, biproduct.toSubtype_π, biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype, Category.id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.toSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.fromSubtype f p =
biproduct.map fun j => if p j then 𝟙 (f j) else 0 := by
ext1 i
by_cases h : p i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
end
section
variable (f : J → C) (i : J) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f)]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.π f i` is the inclusion from the biproduct which omits `i`
from the index set `J` into the biproduct over `J`. -/
def biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (biproduct.fromSubtype f fun j => j ≠ i) (by simp) :
KernelFork (biproduct.π f i)) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨s.ι ≫ biproduct.toSubtype _ _, by
apply biproduct.hom_ext; intro j
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.map_π]
rcases Classical.em (i = j) with (rfl | h)
· rw [if_neg (Classical.not_not.2 rfl), comp_zero, comp_zero, KernelFork.condition]
· rw [if_pos (Ne.symm h), Category.comp_id], by
intro m hm
rw [← hm, KernelFork.ι_ofι, Category.assoc, biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype]
exact (Category.comp_id _).symm⟩
instance : HasKernel (biproduct.π f i) :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype f i⟩
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.π f i` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict {i}ᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def kernelBiproductπIso : kernel (biproduct.π f i) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f :=
limit.isoLimitCone ⟨_, biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype f i⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.ι f i` is the projection from the biproduct over the index set `J`
onto the biproduct omitting `i`. -/
def biproduct.isColimitToSubtype :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (biproduct.toSubtype f fun j => j ≠ i) (by simp) :
CokernelCofork (biproduct.ι f i)) :=
Cofork.IsColimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨biproduct.fromSubtype _ _ ≫ s.π, by
apply biproduct.hom_ext'; intro j
rw [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ, biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.ι_map_assoc]
rcases Classical.em (i = j) with (rfl | h)
· rw [if_neg (Classical.not_not.2 rfl), zero_comp, CokernelCofork.condition]
· rw [if_pos (Ne.symm h), Category.id_comp], by
intro m hm
rw [← hm, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ, ← Category.assoc, biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype]
exact (Category.id_comp _).symm⟩
instance : HasCokernel (biproduct.ι f i) :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, biproduct.isColimitToSubtype f i⟩
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.ι f i` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict {i}ᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def cokernelBiproductιIso : cokernel (biproduct.ι f i) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, biproduct.isColimitToSubtype f i⟩
end
section
-- Per https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/15067, we only allow indexing in `Type 0` here.
variable {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] (f : K → C)
/-- The limit cone exhibiting `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f` as the kernel of
`biproduct.toSubtype f p` -/
@[simps]
def kernelForkBiproductToSubtype (p : Set K) :
LimitCone (parallelPair (biproduct.toSubtype f p) 0) where
cone :=
KernelFork.ofι (biproduct.fromSubtype f pᶜ)
(by
classical
ext j k
simp only [Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.ι_toSubtype_assoc,
comp_zero, zero_comp]
rw [dif_neg k.2]
simp only [zero_comp])
isLimit :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun {_} g _ => g ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f pᶜ)
(by
classical
intro W' g' w
ext j
simp only [Category.assoc, biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype, Pi.compl_apply,
biproduct.map_π]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· replace w := w =≫ biproduct.π _ ⟨j, not_not.mp h⟩
simpa using w.symm)
(by aesop_cat)
instance (p : Set K) : HasKernel (biproduct.toSubtype f p) :=
HasLimit.mk (kernelForkBiproductToSubtype f p)
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.toSubtype f p` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def kernelBiproductToSubtypeIso (p : Set K) :
kernel (biproduct.toSubtype f p) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f :=
limit.isoLimitCone (kernelForkBiproductToSubtype f p)
/-- The colimit cocone exhibiting `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f` as the cokernel of
`biproduct.fromSubtype f p` -/
@[simps]
def cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype (p : Set K) :
ColimitCocone (parallelPair (biproduct.fromSubtype f p) 0) where
cocone :=
CokernelCofork.ofπ (biproduct.toSubtype f pᶜ)
(by
classical
ext j k
simp only [Category.assoc, Pi.compl_apply, biproduct.ι_fromSubtype_assoc,
biproduct.ι_toSubtype_assoc, comp_zero, zero_comp]
rw [dif_neg]
· simp only [zero_comp]
· exact not_not.mpr k.2)
isColimit :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _ (fun {_} g _ => biproduct.fromSubtype f pᶜ ≫ g)
(by
classical
intro W g' w
ext j
simp only [biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, Pi.compl_apply, biproduct.ι_map_assoc]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· replace w := biproduct.ι _ (⟨j, not_not.mp h⟩ : p) ≫= w
simpa using w.symm)
(by aesop_cat)
instance (p : Set K) : HasCokernel (biproduct.fromSubtype f p) :=
HasColimit.mk (cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype f p)
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.fromSubtype f p` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def cokernelBiproductFromSubtypeIso (p : Set K) :
cokernel (biproduct.fromSubtype f p) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone (cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype f p)
end
end πKernel
section FiniteBiproducts
variable {J : Type} [Finite J] {K : Type} [Finite K] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
/-- Convert a (dependently typed) matrix to a morphism of biproducts. -/
def biproduct.matrix (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
biproduct.desc fun j => biproduct.lift fun k => m j k
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.matrix_π (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) (k : K) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.π g k = biproduct.desc fun j => m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.matrix]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_matrix (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.matrix]
/-- Extract the matrix components from a morphism of biproducts. -/
def biproduct.components (m : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g) (j : J) (k : K) : f j ⟶ g k :=
biproduct.ι f j ≫ m ≫ biproduct.π g k
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.matrix_components (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) (j : J) (k : K) :
biproduct.components (biproduct.matrix m) j k = m j k := by simp [biproduct.components]
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.components_matrix (m : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g) :
(biproduct.matrix fun j k => biproduct.components m j k) = m := by
ext
simp [biproduct.components]
/-- Morphisms between direct sums are matrices. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.matrixEquiv : (⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g) ≃ ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k where
toFun := biproduct.components
invFun := biproduct.matrix
left_inv := biproduct.components_matrix
right_inv m := by
ext
apply biproduct.matrix_components
end FiniteBiproducts
variable {J : Type w}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
instance biproduct.ι_mono (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : IsSplitMono (biproduct.ι f b) := by
classical exact IsSplitMono.mk' { retraction := biproduct.desc <| Pi.single b (𝟙 (f b)) }
instance biproduct.π_epi (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : IsSplitEpi (biproduct.π f b) := by
classical exact IsSplitEpi.mk' { section_ := biproduct.lift <| Pi.single b (𝟙 (f b)) }
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `biproduct.uniqueUpToIso`. -/
theorem biproduct.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {b : Bicone f}
(hb : b.IsBilimit) :
(hb.isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit _)).hom = biproduct.lift b.π :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `biproduct.uniqueUpToIso`. -/
theorem biproduct.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {b : Bicone f}
(hb : b.IsBilimit) :
(hb.isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit _)).inv = biproduct.desc b.ι := by
classical
refine biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ fun j => hb.isLimit.hom_ext fun j' => ?_
rw [Category.assoc, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp, Bicone.toCone_π_app,
biproduct.bicone_π, biproduct.ι_desc, biproduct.ι_π, b.toCone_π_app, b.ι_π]
/-- Biproducts are unique up to isomorphism. This already follows because bilimits are limits,
but in the case of biproducts we can give an isomorphism with particularly nice definitional
properties, namely that `biproduct.lift b.π` and `biproduct.desc b.ι` are inverses of each
other. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.uniqueUpToIso (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {b : Bicone f} (hb : b.IsBilimit) :
b.pt ≅ ⨁ f where
hom := biproduct.lift b.π
inv := biproduct.desc b.ι
hom_inv_id := by
rw [← biproduct.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom f hb, ←
biproduct.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv f hb, Iso.hom_inv_id]
inv_hom_id := by
rw [← biproduct.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom f hb, ←
biproduct.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv f hb, Iso.inv_hom_id]
variable (C)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A category with finite biproducts has a zero object. -/
instance (priority := 100) hasZeroObject_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasZeroObject C := by
refine ⟨⟨biproduct Empty.elim, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, ?_⟩⟩⟩⟩
· intro a; apply biproduct.hom_ext'; simp
· intro a; apply biproduct.hom_ext; simp
section
variable {C}
attribute [local simp] eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton in
/-- The limit bicone for the biproduct over an index type with exactly one term. -/
@[simps]
def limitBiconeOfUnique [Unique J] (f : J → C) : LimitBicone f where
bicone :=
{ pt := f default
π := fun j => eqToHom (by congr; rw [← Unique.uniq] )
ι := fun j => eqToHom (by congr; rw [← Unique.uniq] ) }
isBilimit :=
{ isLimit := (limitConeOfUnique f).isLimit
isColimit := (colimitCoconeOfUnique f).isColimit }
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproduct_unique [Subsingleton J] [Nonempty J] (f : J → C) :
HasBiproduct f :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_unique J; .mk (limitBiconeOfUnique f)
/-- A biproduct over an index type with exactly one term is just the object over that term. -/
@[simps!]
def biproductUniqueIso [Unique J] (f : J → C) : ⨁ f ≅ f default :=
(biproduct.uniqueUpToIso _ (limitBiconeOfUnique f).isBilimit).symm
end
end CategoryTheory.Limits
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 2,146 | 2,148 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Exhaustion
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
/-!
# s-finite measures can be written as `withDensity` of a finite measure
If `μ` is an s-finite measure, then there exists a finite measure `μ.toFinite`
such that a set is `μ`-null iff it is `μ.toFinite`-null.
In particular, `MeasureTheory.ae μ.toFinite = MeasureTheory.ae μ` and `μ.toFinite = 0` iff `μ = 0`.
As a corollary, `μ` can be represented as `μ.toFinite.withDensity (μ.rnDeriv μ.toFinite)`.
Our definition of `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite` ensures some extra properties:
- if `μ` is a finite measure, then `μ.toFinite = μ[|univ] = (μ univ)⁻¹ • μ`;
- in particular, `μ.toFinite = μ` for a probability measure;
- if `μ ≠ 0`, then `μ.toFinite` is a probability measure.
## Main definitions
In these definitions and the results below, `μ` is an s-finite measure (`SFinite μ`).
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite`: a finite measure with `μ ≪ μ.toFinite` and `μ.toFinite ≪ μ`.
If `μ ≠ 0`, this is a probability measure.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.densityToFinite` (deprecated, use `MeasureTheory.Measure.rnDeriv`):
the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `μ.toFinite` with respect to `μ`.
## Main statements
* `absolutelyContinuous_toFinite`: `μ ≪ μ.toFinite`.
* `toFinite_absolutelyContinuous`: `μ.toFinite ≪ μ`.
* `ae_toFinite`: `ae μ.toFinite = ae μ`.
-/
open Set
open scoped ENNReal ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite`. -/
noncomputable def Measure.toFiniteAux (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : Measure α :=
letI := Classical.dec
if IsFiniteMeasure μ then μ else (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose
/-- A finite measure obtained from an s-finite measure `μ`, such that
`μ = μ.toFinite.withDensity μ.densityToFinite` (see `withDensity_densitytoFinite`).
If `μ` is non-zero, this is a probability measure. -/
noncomputable def Measure.toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : Measure α :=
μ.toFiniteAux[|univ]
@[local simp]
lemma ae_toFiniteAux [SFinite μ] : ae μ.toFiniteAux = ae μ := by
rw [Measure.toFiniteAux]
split_ifs
· simp
· obtain ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose_spec
exact h₂.ae_le.antisymm h₁.ae_le
@[local instance]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_toFiniteAux [SFinite μ] : IsFiniteMeasure μ.toFiniteAux := by
rw [Measure.toFiniteAux]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose_spec.1
@[simp]
lemma ae_toFinite [SFinite μ] : ae μ.toFinite = ae μ := by
simp [Measure.toFinite, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
@[simp]
lemma toFinite_apply_eq_zero_iff [SFinite μ] {s : Set α} : μ.toFinite s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
simp only [← compl_mem_ae_iff, ae_toFinite]
@[simp]
lemma toFinite_eq_zero_iff [SFinite μ] : μ.toFinite = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, toFinite_apply_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
lemma toFinite_zero : Measure.toFinite (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp
lemma toFinite_eq_self [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ.toFinite = μ := by
rw [Measure.toFinite, Measure.toFiniteAux, if_pos, ProbabilityTheory.cond_univ]
infer_instance
instance [SFinite μ] : IsFiniteMeasure μ.toFinite := by
rw [Measure.toFinite]
infer_instance
instance [SFinite μ] [NeZero μ] : IsProbabilityMeasure μ.toFinite := by
apply ProbabilityTheory.cond_isProbabilityMeasure
simp [ne_eq, ← compl_mem_ae_iff, ae_toFiniteAux]
lemma absolutelyContinuous_toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : μ ≪ μ.toFinite :=
Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous.mp ae_toFinite.ge
lemma sfiniteSeq_absolutelyContinuous_toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (n : ℕ) :
sfiniteSeq μ n ≪ μ.toFinite :=
(sfiniteSeq_le μ n).absolutelyContinuous.trans (absolutelyContinuous_toFinite μ)
lemma toFinite_absolutelyContinuous (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : μ.toFinite ≪ μ :=
Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous.mp ae_toFinite.le
lemma restrict_compl_sigmaFiniteSet [SFinite μ] :
μ.restrict μ.sigmaFiniteSetᶜ = ∞ • μ.toFinite.restrict μ.sigmaFiniteSetᶜ := by
rw [Measure.sigmaFiniteSet,
restrict_compl_sigmaFiniteSetWRT (Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl μ)]
ext t ht
simp only [Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
by_cases hμt : μ (t ∩ (μ.sigmaFiniteSetWRT μ)ᶜ) = 0
· rw [hμt, toFinite_absolutelyContinuous μ hμt]
· rw [ENNReal.top_mul hμt, ENNReal.top_mul]
exact fun h ↦ hμt (absolutelyContinuous_toFinite μ h)
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensityFinite.lean | 232 | 249 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Hom
/-!
# Congruence relations
This file proves basic properties of the quotient of a type by a congruence relation.
The second half of the file concerns congruence relations on monoids, in which case the
quotient by the congruence relation is also a monoid. There are results about the universal
property of quotients of monoids, and the isomorphism theorems for monoids.
## Implementation notes
A congruence relation on a monoid `M` can be thought of as a submonoid of `M × M` for which
membership is an equivalence relation, but whilst this fact is established in the file, it is not
used, since this perspective adds more layers of definitional unfolding.
## Tags
congruence, congruence relation, quotient, quotient by congruence relation, monoid,
quotient monoid, isomorphism theorems
-/
variable (M : Type*) {N : Type*} {P : Type*}
open Function Setoid
variable {M}
namespace Con
section
variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (c : Con M)
variable {c}
/-- Given types with multiplications `M, N`, the product of two congruence relations `c` on `M` and
`d` on `N`: `(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ M × N` are related by `c.prod d` iff `x₁` is related to `y₁`
by `c` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `d`. -/
@[to_additive prod "Given types with additions `M, N`, the product of two congruence relations
`c` on `M` and `d` on `N`: `(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ M × N` are related by `c.prod d` iff `x₁`
is related to `y₁` by `c` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `d`."]
protected def prod (c : Con M) (d : Con N) : Con (M × N) :=
{ c.toSetoid.prod d.toSetoid with
mul' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.mul h1.1 h2.1, d.mul h1.2 h2.2⟩ }
/-- The product of an indexed collection of congruence relations. -/
@[to_additive "The product of an indexed collection of additive congruence relations."]
def pi {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Mul (f i)] (C : ∀ i, Con (f i)) : Con (∀ i, f i) :=
{ @piSetoid _ _ fun i => (C i).toSetoid with
mul' := fun h1 h2 i => (C i).mul (h1 i) (h2 i) }
/-- Makes an isomorphism of quotients by two congruence relations, given that the relations are
equal. -/
@[to_additive "Makes an additive isomorphism of quotients by two additive congruence relations,
given that the relations are equal."]
protected def congr {c d : Con M} (h : c = d) : c.Quotient ≃* d.Quotient :=
{ Quotient.congr (Equiv.refl M) <| by apply Con.ext_iff.mp h with
map_mul' := fun x y => by rcases x with ⟨⟩; rcases y with ⟨⟩; rfl }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem congr_mk {c d : Con M} (h : c = d) (a : M) :
Con.congr h (a : c.Quotient) = (a : d.Quotient) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_conGen {M N : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N)
(H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (rel : N → N → Prop) :
conGen (fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) ≤ Con.comap f H (conGen rel) := by
intro x y h
simp only [Con.comap_rel]
exact .rec (fun x y h ↦ .of (f x) (f y) h) (fun x ↦ .refl (f x))
(fun _ h ↦ .symm h) (fun _ _ h1 h2 ↦ h1.trans h2) (fun {w x y z} _ _ h1 h2 ↦
(congrArg (fun a ↦ conGen rel a (f (x * z))) (H w y)).mpr
(((congrArg (fun a ↦ conGen rel (f w * f y) a) (H x z))).mpr
(.mul h1 h2))) h
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_conGen_equiv {M N : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : MulEquiv M N) (rel : N → N → Prop) :
Con.comap f (map_mul f) (conGen rel) = conGen (fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (le_comap_conGen f (map_mul f) rel)
intro a b h
simp only [Con.comap_rel] at h
have H : ∀ n1 n2, (conGen rel) n1 n2 → ∀ a b, f a = n1 → f b = n2 →
(conGen fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) a b := by
intro n1 n2 h
induction h with
| of x y h =>
intro _ _ fa fb
apply ConGen.Rel.of
rwa [fa, fb]
| refl x =>
intro _ _ fc fd
rw [f.injective (fc.trans fd.symm)]
exact ConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm _ h => exact fun a b fs fb ↦ ConGen.Rel.symm (h b a fb fs)
| trans _ _ ih ih1 =>
exact fun a b fa fb ↦ Exists.casesOn (f.surjective _) fun c' hc' ↦
ConGen.Rel.trans (ih a c' fa hc') (ih1 c' b hc' fb)
| mul _ _ ih ih1 =>
rename_i w x y z _ _
intro a b fa fb
rw [← f.eq_symm_apply, map_mul] at fa fb
rw [fa, fb]
exact ConGen.Rel.mul (ih (f.symm w) (f.symm x) (by simp) (by simp))
(ih1 (f.symm y) (f.symm z) (by simp) (by simp))
exact H (f a) (f b) h a b (refl _) (refl _)
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_conGen_of_bijective {M N : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N)
(hf : Function.Bijective f) (H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (rel : N → N → Prop) :
Con.comap f H (conGen rel) = conGen (fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) :=
comap_conGen_equiv (MulEquiv.ofBijective (MulHom.mk f H) hf) rel
end
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (c : Con M)
/-- The submonoid of `M × M` defined by a congruence relation on a monoid `M`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe) "The `AddSubmonoid` of `M × M` defined by an additive congruence
relation on an `AddMonoid` `M`."]
protected def submonoid : Submonoid (M × M) where
carrier := { x | c x.1 x.2 }
one_mem' := c.iseqv.1 1
mul_mem' := c.mul
variable {c}
/-- The congruence relation on a monoid `M` from a submonoid of `M × M` for which membership
is an equivalence relation. -/
@[to_additive "The additive congruence relation on an `AddMonoid` `M` from
an `AddSubmonoid` of `M × M` for which membership is an equivalence relation."]
def ofSubmonoid (N : Submonoid (M × M)) (H : Equivalence fun x y => (x, y) ∈ N) : Con M where
r x y := (x, y) ∈ N
iseqv := H
mul' := N.mul_mem
/-- Coercion from a congruence relation `c` on a monoid `M` to the submonoid of `M × M` whose
elements are `(x, y)` such that `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
@[to_additive "Coercion from a congruence relation `c` on an `AddMonoid` `M`
to the `AddSubmonoid` of `M × M` whose elements are `(x, y)` such that `x`
is related to `y` by `c`."]
instance toSubmonoid : Coe (Con M) (Submonoid (M × M)) :=
⟨fun c => c.submonoid⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_coe {c : Con M} {x y} : (x, y) ∈ (↑c : Submonoid (M × M)) ↔ (x, y) ∈ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem to_submonoid_inj (c d : Con M) (H : (c : Submonoid (M × M)) = d) : c = d :=
ext fun x y => show (x, y) ∈ c.submonoid ↔ (x, y) ∈ d from H ▸ Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_iff {c d : Con M} : c ≤ d ↔ (c : Submonoid (M × M)) ≤ d :=
⟨fun h _ H => h H, fun h x y hc => h <| show (x, y) ∈ c from hc⟩
variable (x y : M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
-- Porting note: removed dot notation
theorem mrange_mk' : MonoidHom.mrange c.mk' = ⊤ :=
MonoidHom.mrange_eq_top.2 mk'_surjective
variable {f : M →* P}
/-- Given a congruence relation `c` on a monoid and a homomorphism `f` constant on `c`'s
equivalence classes, `f` has the same image as the homomorphism that `f` induces on the
quotient. -/
@[to_additive "Given an additive congruence relation `c` on an `AddMonoid` and a homomorphism `f`
constant on `c`'s equivalence classes, `f` has the same image as the homomorphism that `f` induces
on the quotient."]
theorem lift_range (H : c ≤ ker f) : MonoidHom.mrange (c.lift f H) = MonoidHom.mrange f :=
Submonoid.ext fun x => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨y⟩, hy⟩; exact ⟨y, hy⟩, fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => ⟨↑y, hy⟩⟩
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f`, the induced homomorphism on the quotient by `f`'s kernel has
the same image as `f`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Given an `AddMonoid` homomorphism `f`, the induced homomorphism
on the quotient by `f`'s kernel has the same image as `f`."]
theorem kerLift_range_eq : MonoidHom.mrange (kerLift f) = MonoidHom.mrange f :=
lift_range fun _ _ => id
variable (c)
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem for monoids**. -/
@[to_additive "The first isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s."]
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange (f : M →* P) : (ker f).Quotient ≃* MonoidHom.mrange f :=
{ Equiv.ofBijective
((@MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MonoidHom.mrange (kerLift f)) _ _ _ <|
MulEquiv.submonoidCongr kerLift_range_eq).comp
(kerLift f).mrangeRestrict) <|
((Equiv.bijective (@MulEquiv.toEquiv (MonoidHom.mrange (kerLift f)) _ _ _ <|
MulEquiv.submonoidCongr kerLift_range_eq)).comp
⟨fun x y h =>
kerLift_injective f <| by rcases x with ⟨⟩; rcases y with ⟨⟩; injections,
fun ⟨w, z, hz⟩ => ⟨z, by rcases hz with ⟨⟩; rfl⟩⟩) with
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _ }
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for monoids in the case of a homomorphism with right inverse. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The first isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s in the case of a homomorphism
with right inverse."]
def quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (f : M →* P) (g : P → M) (hf : Function.RightInverse g f) :
(ker f).Quotient ≃* P :=
{ kerLift f with
toFun := kerLift f
invFun := (↑) ∘ g
left_inv := fun x => kerLift_injective _ (by rw [Function.comp_apply, kerLift_mk, hf])
right_inv := fun x => by (conv_rhs => rw [← hf x]); rfl }
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for Monoids in the case of a surjective homomorphism.
For a `computable` version, see `Con.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`.
-/
@[to_additive "The first isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s in the case of a surjective
homomorphism.
For a `computable` version, see `AddCon.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`.
"]
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (f : M →* P) (hf : Surjective f) :
(ker f).Quotient ≃* P :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse _ _ hf.hasRightInverse.choose_spec
/-- If e : M →* N is surjective then (c.comap e).Quotient ≃* c.Quotient with c : Con N -/
@[to_additive "If e : M →* N is surjective then (c.comap e).Quotient ≃* c.Quotient with c :
AddCon N"]
noncomputable def comapQuotientEquivOfSurj (c : Con M) (f : N →* M) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(Con.comap f f.map_mul c).Quotient ≃* c.Quotient :=
(Con.congr Con.comap_eq).trans <| Con.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (c.mk'.comp f) <|
Con.mk'_surjective.comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma comapQuotientEquivOfSurj_mk (c : Con M) {f : N →* M} (hf : Function.Surjective f) (x : N) :
comapQuotientEquivOfSurj c f hf x = f x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma comapQuotientEquivOfSurj_symm_mk (c : Con M) {f : N →* M} (hf) (x : N) :
(comapQuotientEquivOfSurj c f hf).symm (f x) = x :=
(MulEquiv.symm_apply_eq (c.comapQuotientEquivOfSurj f hf)).mpr rfl
/-- This version infers the surjectivity of the function from a MulEquiv function -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "This version infers the surjectivity of the function from a
MulEquiv function"]
lemma comapQuotientEquivOfSurj_symm_mk' (c : Con M) (f : N ≃* M) (x : N) :
((@MulEquiv.symm (Con.Quotient (comap ⇑f _ c)) _ _ _
(comapQuotientEquivOfSurj c (f : N →* M) f.surjective)) ⟦f x⟧) = ↑x :=
(MulEquiv.symm_apply_eq (@comapQuotientEquivOfSurj M N _ _ c f _)).mpr rfl
/-- The **second isomorphism theorem for monoids**. -/
@[to_additive "The second isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s."]
noncomputable def comapQuotientEquiv (f : N →* M) :
(comap f f.map_mul c).Quotient ≃* MonoidHom.mrange (c.mk'.comp f) :=
(Con.congr comap_eq).trans <| quotientKerEquivRange <| c.mk'.comp f
/-- The **third isomorphism theorem for monoids**. -/
@[to_additive "The third isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s."]
def quotientQuotientEquivQuotient (c d : Con M) (h : c ≤ d) :
(ker (c.map d h)).Quotient ≃* d.Quotient :=
{ Setoid.quotientQuotientEquivQuotient c.toSetoid d.toSetoid h with
map_mul' := fun x y =>
Con.induction_on₂ x y fun w z =>
Con.induction_on₂ w z fun a b =>
show _ = d.mk' a * d.mk' b by rw [← d.mk'.map_mul]; rfl }
end MulOneClass
section Monoids
@[to_additive]
theorem smul {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M) (a : α)
{w x : M} (h : c w x) : c (a • w) (a • x) := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using c.mul (c.refl' (a • (1 : M) : M)) h
end Monoids
section Actions
@[to_additive]
instance instSMul {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M) :
SMul α c.Quotient where
smul a := (Quotient.map' (a • ·)) fun _ _ => c.smul a
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_smul {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M)
(a : α) (x : M) : (↑(a • x) : c.Quotient) = a • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass {α β M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [SMul β M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] [IsScalarTower β M M] [SMulCommClass α β M] (c : Con M) :
SMulCommClass α β c.Quotient where
smul_comm a b := Quotient.ind' fun m => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_comm a b m
instance instIsScalarTower {α β M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α β] [SMul α M] [SMul β M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] [IsScalarTower β M M] [IsScalarTower α β M] (c : Con M) :
IsScalarTower α β c.Quotient where
smul_assoc a b := Quotient.ind' fun m => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_assoc a b m
instance instIsCentralScalar {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] [IsScalarTower αᵐᵒᵖ M M] [IsCentralScalar α M] (c : Con M) :
IsCentralScalar α c.Quotient where
op_smul_eq_smul a := Quotient.ind' fun m => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| op_smul_eq_smul a m
@[to_additive]
instance mulAction {α M : Type*} [Monoid α] [MulOneClass M] [MulAction α M] [IsScalarTower α M M]
(c : Con M) : MulAction α c.Quotient where
one_smul := Quotient.ind' fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| one_smul _ _
mul_smul _ _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| mul_smul _ _ _
instance mulDistribMulAction {α M : Type*} [Monoid α] [Monoid M] [MulDistribMulAction α M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M) : MulDistribMulAction α c.Quotient :=
{ smul_one := fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_one _
smul_mul := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_mul' _ _ _ }
end Actions
end Con
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Congruence/Basic.lean | 1,248 | 1,249 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.ENNReal
/-!
# Counting measure
In this file we define the counting measure `MeasurTheory.Measure.count`
as `MeasureTheory.Measure.sum MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac`
and prove basic properties of this measure.
-/
open Set
open scoped ENNReal Finset
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
/-- Counting measure on any measurable space. -/
def count : Measure α :=
sum dirac
@[simp] lemma count_ne_zero'' [Nonempty α] : (count : Measure α) ≠ 0 := by simp [count]
theorem le_count_apply : ∑' _ : s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ count s :=
calc
(∑' _ : s, 1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑' i, indicator s 1 i := tsum_subtype s 1
_ ≤ ∑' i, dirac i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => le_dirac_apply
_ ≤ count s := le_sum_apply _ _
|
theorem count_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : count s = s.encard := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Count.lean | 37 | 38 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
| · rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 737 | 743 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_closedBall (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
namespace Behrend
variable {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem card_box : #(box n d) = d ^ n := by simp [box]
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) := {x ∈ box n d | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k}
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by simp [sphere]
theorem sphere_subset_box : sphere n d k ⊆ box n d :=
filter_subset _ _
theorem norm_of_mem_sphere {x : Fin n → ℕ} (hx : x ∈ sphere n d k) :
‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)‖ = √↑k := by
rw [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq]
dsimp
simp_rw [abs_cast, ← cast_pow, ← cast_sum, (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
theorem sphere_subset_preimage_metric_sphere : (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) ⊆
(fun x : Fin n → ℕ => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)) ⁻¹'
Metric.sphere (0 : PiLp 2 fun _ : Fin n => ℝ) (√↑k) :=
fun x hx => by rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_of_mem_sphere hx]
/-- The map that appears in Behrend's bound on Roth numbers. -/
@[simps]
def map (d : ℕ) : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ ℕ where
toFun a := ∑ i, a i * d ^ (i : ℕ)
map_zero' := by simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero]
map_add' a b := by simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, add_mul, sum_add_distrib]
theorem map_zero (d : ℕ) (a : Fin 0 → ℕ) : map d a = 0 := by simp [map]
theorem map_succ (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) :
map d a = a 0 + (∑ x : Fin n, a x.succ * d ^ (x : ℕ)) * d := by
simp [map, Fin.sum_univ_succ, _root_.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ← sum_mul]
theorem map_succ' (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) : map d a = a 0 + map d (a ∘ Fin.succ) * d :=
map_succ _
theorem map_monotone (d : ℕ) : Monotone (map d : (Fin n → ℕ) → ℕ) := fun x y h => by
dsimp; exact sum_le_sum fun i _ => Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ <| h i
theorem map_mod (a : Fin n.succ → ℕ) : map d a % d = a 0 % d := by
rw [map_succ, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right]
theorem map_eq_iff {x₁ x₂ : Fin n.succ → ℕ} (hx₁ : ∀ i, x₁ i < d) (hx₂ : ∀ i, x₂ i < d) :
| map d x₁ = map d x₂ ↔ x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 ∧ map d (x₁ ∘ Fin.succ) = map d (x₂ ∘ Fin.succ) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [map_succ', map_succ', h.1, h.2]⟩
have : x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 150 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.IdentDistrib
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.FloorPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
/-!
# The strong law of large numbers
We prove the strong law of large numbers, in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`:
If `X n` is a sequence of independent identically distributed integrable random
variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`.
We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence.
This file also contains the Lᵖ version of the strong law of large numbers provided by
`ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_Lp` which shows `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges in Lᵖ to
`𝔼[X 0]` provided `X n` is independent identically distributed and is Lᵖ.
## Implementation
The main point is to prove the result for real-valued random variables, as the general case
of Banach-space valued random variables follows from this case and approximation by simple
functions. The real version is given in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae_real`.
We follow the proof by Etemadi
[Etemadi, *An elementary proof of the strong law of large numbers*][etemadi_strong_law],
which goes as follows.
It suffices to prove the result for nonnegative `X`, as one can prove the general result by
splitting a general `X` into its positive part and negative part.
Consider `Xₙ` a sequence of nonnegative integrable identically distributed pairwise independent
random variables. Let `Yₙ` be the truncation of `Xₙ` up to `n`. We claim that
* Almost surely, `Xₙ = Yₙ` for all but finitely many indices. Indeed, `∑ ℙ (Xₙ ≠ Yₙ)` is bounded by
`1 + 𝔼[X]` (see `sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le` and `tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top`).
* Let `c > 1`. Along the sequence `n = c ^ k`, then `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ])/n` converges almost
surely to `0`. This follows from a variance control, as
```
∑_k ℙ (|∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ]| > c^k ε)
≤ ∑_k (c^k ε)^{-2} ∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Var[Yᵢ] (by Markov inequality)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) Var[Yᵢ] (as ∑_{c^k > i} 1/(c^k)^2 ≤ C/i^2)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) 𝔼[Yᵢ^2]
≤ 2C 𝔼[X^2] (see `sum_variance_truncation_le`)
```
* As `𝔼[Yᵢ]` converges to `𝔼[X]`, it follows from the two previous items and Cesàro that, along
the sequence `n = c^k`, one has `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ) / n → 𝔼[X]` almost surely.
* To generalize it to all indices, we use the fact that `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ` is nondecreasing and
that, if `c` is close enough to `1`, the gap between `c^k` and `c^(k+1)` is small.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Set (indicator)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-! ### Prerequisites on truncations -/
section Truncation
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Truncating a real-valued function to the interval `(-A, A]`. -/
def truncation (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) :=
indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id ∘ f
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{A : ℝ} : AEStronglyMeasurable (truncation f A) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable _ hf.aemeasurable
exact (stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem abs_truncation_le_bound (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |A| := by
simp only [truncation, Set.indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_le_abs h.2 (neg_le.2 h.1.le)
· simp [abs_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem truncation_zero (f : α → ℝ) : truncation f 0 = 0 := by simp [truncation]; rfl
theorem abs_truncation_le_abs_self (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) (x : α) : |truncation f A x| ≤ |f x| := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· simp [abs_nonneg]
theorem truncation_eq_self {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} {x : α} (h : |f x| < A) :
truncation f A x = f x := by
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Icc, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro H
apply H.elim
simp [(abs_lt.1 h).1, (abs_lt.1 h).2.le]
theorem truncation_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} {A : ℝ} (h : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
truncation f A = indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id ∘ f := by
ext x
rcases (h x).lt_or_eq with (hx | hx)
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, Set.mem_Ioc, id, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases h'x : f x ≤ A
· have : -A < f x := by linarith [h x]
simp only [this, true_and]
· simp only [h'x, and_false]
· simp only [truncation, indicator, hx, id, Function.comp_apply, ite_self]
theorem truncation_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (A : ℝ) {x : α} (h : 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ truncation f A x :=
Set.indicator_apply_nonneg fun _ => h
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.memLp_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0∞} : MemLp (truncation f A) p μ :=
MemLp.of_bound hf.truncation |A| (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => abs_truncation_le_bound _ _ _)
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integrable_truncation [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} : Integrable (truncation f A) μ := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]; exact hf.memLp_truncation
theorem moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ} (hA : 0 ≤ A)
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ^ n ∂μ = ∫ y in -A..A, y ^ n ∂Measure.map f μ := by
have M : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc (-A) A) := measurableSet_Ioc
change ∫ x, (fun z => indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id z ^ n) (f x) ∂μ = _
rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le,
← integral_indicator M]
· simp only [indicator, zero_pow hn, id, ite_pow]
· linarith
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h'f : 0 ≤ f) :
∫ x, truncation f A x ^ n ∂μ = ∫ y in (0)..A, y ^ n ∂Measure.map f μ := by
have M : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc 0 A) := measurableSet_Ioc
have M' : MeasurableSet (Set.Ioc A 0) := measurableSet_Ioc
rw [truncation_eq_of_nonneg h'f]
change ∫ x, (fun z => indicator (Set.Ioc 0 A) id z ^ n) (f x) ∂μ = _
rcases le_or_lt 0 A with (hA | hA)
· rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hA,
← integral_indicator M]
· simp only [indicator, zero_pow hn, id, ite_pow]
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
· rw [← integral_map (f := fun z => _ ^ n) hf.aemeasurable, intervalIntegral.integral_of_ge hA.le,
← integral_indicator M']
· simp only [Set.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le hA.le, zero_pow hn, Set.indicator_empty, integral_zero,
zero_eq_neg]
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂Measure.map f μ, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x :=
(ae_map_iff hf.aemeasurable measurableSet_Ici).2 (Eventually.of_forall h'f)
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
simp only [indicator, Set.mem_Ioc, Pi.zero_apply, ite_eq_right_iff, and_imp]
intro _ h''x
have : x = 0 := by linarith
simp [this, zero_pow hn]
· exact ((measurable_id.indicator M).pow_const n).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
(hA : 0 ≤ A) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ = ∫ y in -A..A, y ∂Measure.map f μ := by
simpa using moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral hf hA one_ne_zero
theorem integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {A : ℝ}
(h'f : 0 ≤ f) : ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ = ∫ y in (0)..A, y ∂Measure.map f μ := by
simpa using moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hf one_ne_zero h'f
theorem integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg (hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : 0 ≤ f) {A : ℝ} :
∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
apply integral_mono_of_nonneg
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_) hf (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
· exact truncation_nonneg _ (h'f x)
· calc
truncation f A x ≤ |truncation f A x| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |f x| := abs_truncation_le_abs_self _ _ _
_ = f x := abs_of_nonneg (h'f x)
/-- If a function is integrable, then the integral of its truncated versions converges to the
integral of the whole function. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_truncation {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun A => ∫ x, truncation f A x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x => abs (f x)) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun A ↦ hf.aestronglyMeasurable.truncation
· filter_upwards with A
filter_upwards with x
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_truncation_le_abs_self _ _ _
· exact hf.abs
· filter_upwards with x
apply tendsto_const_nhds.congr' _
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop (abs (f x))] with A hA
exact (truncation_eq_self hA).symm
theorem IdentDistrib.truncation {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ}
{g : β → ℝ} (h : IdentDistrib f g μ ν) {A : ℝ} :
IdentDistrib (truncation f A) (truncation g A) μ ν :=
h.comp (measurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc)
end Truncation
section StrongLawAeReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasureSpace Ω] [IsProbabilityMeasure (ℙ : Measure Ω)]
section MomentEstimates
theorem sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) {K : ℕ} {N : ℕ}
(hKN : K ≤ N) :
∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) := by
let ρ : Measure ℝ := Measure.map X ℙ
haveI : IsProbabilityMeasure ρ := isProbabilityMeasure_map hint.aemeasurable
have A : ∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in j..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ ≤ 𝔼[X] + 1 :=
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in j..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ =
∑ j ∈ range K, ∑ i ∈ Ico j N, ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
apply sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals_Ico ((mem_range.1 hj).le.trans hKN)]
intro k _
exact continuous_const.intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∑ i ∈ range N, ∑ j ∈ range (min (i + 1) K), ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
simp_rw [sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
aesop (add simp Nat.lt_succ_iff)
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range N, (i + 1) * ∫ _ in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_min]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_left _ _) ?_
apply intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg
· simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
· simp only [zero_le_one, imp_true_iff]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range N, ∫ x in i..(i + 1 : ℕ), x + 1 ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
have I : (i : ℝ) ≤ (i + 1 : ℕ) := by
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le I, ← integral_const_mul]
apply setIntegral_mono_on
· exact continuous_const.integrableOn_Ioc
· exact (continuous_id.add continuous_const).integrableOn_Ioc
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
· intro x hx
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Set.mem_Ioc] at hx
simp [hx.1.le]
_ = ∫ x in (0)..N, x + 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals fun k _ => ?_]
· norm_cast
· exact (continuous_id.add continuous_const).intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∫ x in (0)..N, x ∂ρ + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add]
· exact continuous_id.intervalIntegrable _ _
· exact continuous_const.intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = 𝔼[truncation X N] + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ := by
rw [integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 hnonneg]
_ ≤ 𝔼[X] + ∫ x in (0)..N, 1 ∂ρ :=
(add_le_add_right (integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg hint hnonneg) _)
_ ≤ 𝔼[X] + 1 := by
refine add_le_add le_rfl ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (Nat.cast_nonneg _)]
simp only [integral_const, measureReal_restrict_apply', measurableSet_Ioc, Set.univ_inter,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_one]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.one_ne_top prob_le_one
have B : ∀ a b, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc a b} = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in Set.Ioc a b, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
intro a b
rw [ofReal_setIntegral_one ρ _,
Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable hint.aemeasurable measurableSet_Ioc]
rfl
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N} =
∑ j ∈ range K, ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by simp_rw [B]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_sum_of_nonneg]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ j ∈ range K, ∫ _ in (j : ℝ)..N, (1 : ℝ) ∂ρ) := by
congr 1
refine sum_congr rfl fun j hj => ?_
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 ((mem_range.1 hj).le.trans hKN))]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) := ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal A
theorem tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) :
(∑' j : ℕ, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)}) < ∞ := by
suffices ∀ K : ℕ, ∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (𝔼[X] + 1) from
(le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto (ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum _) tendsto_const_nhds
(Eventually.of_forall this)).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
intro K
have A : Tendsto (fun N : ℕ => ∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (j : ℝ) N}) atTop
(𝓝 (∑ j ∈ range K, ℙ {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)})) := by
refine tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
have : {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioi (i : ℝ)} = ⋃ N : ℕ, {ω | X ω ∈ Set.Ioc (i : ℝ) N} := by
apply Set.Subset.antisymm _ _
· intro ω hω
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, X ω ≤ N := exists_nat_ge (X ω)
exact Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨N, hω, hN⟩
· simp +contextual only [Set.mem_Ioc, Set.mem_Ioi,
Set.iUnion_subset_iff, Set.setOf_subset_setOf, imp_true_iff]
rw [this]
apply tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop
intro m n hmn x hx
exact ⟨hx.1, hx.2.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 hmn)⟩
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto A tendsto_const_nhds
filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop K] with N hN
exact sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le hint hnonneg hN
theorem sum_variance_truncation_le {X : Ω → ℝ} (hint : Integrable X) (hnonneg : 0 ≤ X) (K : ℕ) :
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * 𝔼[truncation X j ^ 2] ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X] := by
set Y := fun n : ℕ => truncation X n
let ρ : Measure ℝ := Measure.map X ℙ
have Y2 : ∀ n, 𝔼[Y n ^ 2] = ∫ x in (0)..n, x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
intro n
change 𝔼[fun x => Y n x ^ 2] = _
rw [moment_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 two_ne_zero hnonneg]
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * 𝔼[Y j ^ 2] =
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * ∫ x in (0)..j, x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by simp_rw [Y2]
_ = ∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * ∑ k ∈ range j, ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
congr 1 with j
congr 1
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals]
· norm_cast
intro k _
exact (continuous_id.pow _).intervalIntegrable _ _
_ = ∑ k ∈ range K, (∑ j ∈ Ioo k K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹) * ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_mul, sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
aesop (add unsafe lt_trans)
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ range K, 2 / (k + 1 : ℝ) * ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), x ^ 2 ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun k _ => ?_
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (sum_Ioo_inv_sq_le _ _) ?_
refine intervalIntegral.integral_nonneg_of_forall ?_ fun u => sq_nonneg _
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one]
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ range K, ∫ x in k..(k + 1 : ℕ), 2 * x ∂ρ := by
apply sum_le_sum fun k _ => ?_
have Ik : (k : ℝ) ≤ (k + 1 : ℕ) := by simp
rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Ik,
intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Ik]
refine setIntegral_mono_on ?_ ?_ measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
· apply Continuous.integrableOn_Ioc
exact continuous_const.mul (continuous_pow 2)
· apply Continuous.integrableOn_Ioc
exact continuous_const.mul continuous_id'
· calc
↑2 / (↑k + ↑1) * x ^ 2 = x / (k + 1) * (2 * x) := by ring
_ ≤ 1 * (2 * x) :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (by
convert (div_le_one _).2 hx.2
· norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
linarith only [show (0 : ℝ) ≤ k from Nat.cast_nonneg k])
(mul_nonneg zero_le_two ((Nat.cast_nonneg k).trans hx.1.le)))
_ = 2 * x := by rw [one_mul]
_ = 2 * ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..K, x ∂ρ := by
rw [intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals fun k _ => ?_]
swap; · exact (continuous_const.mul continuous_id').intervalIntegrable _ _
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
norm_cast
_ ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X] := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (by
rw [← integral_truncation_eq_intervalIntegral_of_nonneg hint.1 hnonneg]
exact integral_truncation_le_integral_of_nonneg hint hnonneg) zero_le_two
end MomentEstimates
/-! Proof of the strong law of large numbers (almost sure version, assuming only
pairwise independence) for nonnegative random variables, following Etemadi's proof. -/
section StrongLawNonneg
variable (X : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (hint : Integrable (X 0))
(hindep : Pairwise (IndepFun on X)) (hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0))
(hnonneg : ∀ i ω, 0 ≤ X i ω)
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncation of `Xᵢ` up to `i` satisfies the strong law of large numbers (with respect to
the truncated expectation) along the sequence `c^n`, for any `c > 1`, up to a given `ε > 0`.
This follows from a variance control. -/
theorem strong_law_aux1 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) : ∀ᵐ ω, ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop,
|∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i ω - 𝔼[∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i]| <
ε * ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ := by
/- Let `S n = ∑ i ∈ range n, Y i` where `Y i = truncation (X i) i`. We should show that
`|S k - 𝔼[S k]| / k ≤ ε` along the sequence of powers of `c`. For this, we apply Borel-Cantelli:
it suffices to show that the converse probabilities are summable. From Chebyshev inequality,
this will follow from a variance control `∑' Var[S (c^i)] / (c^i)^2 < ∞`. This is checked in
`I2` using pairwise independence to expand the variance of the sum as the sum of the variances,
and then a straightforward but tedious computation (essentially boiling down to the fact that
the sum of `1/(c ^ i)^2` beyond a threshold `j` is comparable to `1/j^2`).
Note that we have written `c^i` in the above proof sketch, but rigorously one should put integer
parts everywhere, making things more painful. We write `u i = ⌊c^i⌋₊` for brevity. -/
have c_pos : 0 < c := zero_lt_one.trans c_one
have hX : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (X i) ℙ := fun i =>
(hident i).symm.aestronglyMeasurable_snd hint.1
have A : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (indicator (Set.Ioc (-i : ℝ) i) id) := fun i =>
stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc
set Y := fun n : ℕ => truncation (X n) n
set S := fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, Y i with hS
let u : ℕ → ℕ := fun n => ⌊c ^ n⌋₊
have u_mono : Monotone u := fun i j hij => Nat.floor_mono (pow_right_mono₀ c_one.le hij)
have I1 : ∀ K, ∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[Y j] ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X 0] := by
intro K
calc
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[Y j] ≤
∑ j ∈ range K, ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * 𝔼[truncation (X 0) j ^ 2] := by
apply sum_le_sum fun j _ => ?_
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (inv_nonneg.2 (sq_nonneg _))
rw [(hident j).truncation.variance_eq]
exact variance_le_expectation_sq (hX 0).truncation
_ ≤ 2 * 𝔼[X 0] := sum_variance_truncation_le hint (hnonneg 0) K
let C := c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 * (2 * 𝔼[X 0])
have I2 : ∀ N, ∑ i ∈ range N, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[S (u i)] ≤ C := by
intro N
calc
∑ i ∈ range N, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[S (u i)] =
∑ i ∈ range N, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * ∑ j ∈ range (u i), Var[Y j] := by
congr 1 with i
congr 1
rw [hS, IndepFun.variance_sum]
· intro j _
exact (hident j).aestronglyMeasurable_fst.memLp_truncation
· intro k _ l _ hkl
exact (hindep hkl).comp (A k).measurable (A l).measurable
_ = ∑ j ∈ range (u (N - 1)), (∑ i ∈ range N with j < u i, ((u i : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹) * Var[Y j] := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_mul, sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) (fun p ↦ ⟨p.2, p.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [mem_sigma, mem_range, filter_congr_decidable, mem_filter, and_imp,
Sigma.forall]
exact fun a b haN hb ↦ ⟨hb.trans_le <| u_mono <| Nat.le_pred_of_lt haN, haN, hb⟩
all_goals simp
_ ≤ ∑ j ∈ range (u (N - 1)), c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 / ↑j ^ 2 * Var[Y j] := by
apply sum_le_sum fun j hj => ?_
rcases eq_zero_or_pos j with (rfl | hj)
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, zero_pow, Ne, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, div_zero, zero_mul]
simp only [Y, Nat.cast_zero, truncation_zero, variance_zero, mul_zero, le_rfl]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (variance_nonneg _ _)
convert sum_div_nat_floor_pow_sq_le_div_sq N (Nat.cast_pos.2 hj) c_one using 2
· simp only [u, Nat.cast_lt]
· simp only [Y, S, u, C, one_div]
_ = c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 * ∑ j ∈ range (u (N - 1)), ((j : ℝ) ^ 2)⁻¹ * Var[Y j] := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ c ^ 5 * (c - 1)⁻¹ ^ 3 * (2 * 𝔼[X 0]) := by
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (I1 _)
apply mul_nonneg (pow_nonneg c_pos.le _)
exact pow_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (sub_nonneg.2 c_one.le)) _
have I3 : ∀ N, ∑ i ∈ range N, ℙ {ω | (u i * ε : ℝ) ≤ |S (u i) ω - 𝔼[S (u i)]|} ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ε⁻¹ ^ 2 * C) := by
intro N
calc
∑ i ∈ range N, ℙ {ω | (u i * ε : ℝ) ≤ |S (u i) ω - 𝔼[S (u i)]|} ≤
∑ i ∈ range N, ENNReal.ofReal (Var[S (u i)] / (u i * ε) ^ 2) := by
refine sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
apply meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq
· exact memLp_finset_sum' _ fun j _ => (hident j).aestronglyMeasurable_fst.memLp_truncation
· apply mul_pos (Nat.cast_pos.2 _) εpos
refine zero_lt_one.trans_le ?_
apply Nat.le_floor
rw [Nat.cast_one]
apply one_le_pow₀ c_one.le
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (∑ i ∈ range N, Var[S (u i)] / (u i * ε) ^ 2) := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_sum_of_nonneg fun i _ => ?_]
exact div_nonneg (variance_nonneg _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε⁻¹ ^ 2 * C) := by
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
-- Porting note: do most of the rewrites under `conv` so as not to expand `variance`
conv_lhs =>
enter [2, i]
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_comm _ ε⁻¹, mul_pow, mul_assoc]
rw [← mul_sum]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (sq_nonneg _)
conv_lhs => enter [2, i]; rw [inv_pow]
exact I2 N
have I4 : (∑' i, ℙ {ω | (u i * ε : ℝ) ≤ |S (u i) ω - 𝔼[S (u i)]|}) < ∞ :=
(le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' (ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum _) tendsto_const_nhds I3).trans_lt
ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
filter_upwards [ae_eventually_not_mem I4.ne] with ω hω
simp_rw [S, not_le, mul_comm, sum_apply] at hω
convert hω; simp only [Y, S, u, C, sum_apply]
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncation of `Xᵢ` up to `i` satisfies the strong law of large numbers
(with respect to the truncated expectation) along the sequence
`c^n`, for any `c > 1`. This follows from `strong_law_aux1` by varying `ε`. -/
theorem strong_law_aux2 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) :
∀ᵐ ω, (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i ω -
𝔼[∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i]) =o[atTop] fun n : ℕ => (⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
obtain ⟨v, -, v_pos, v_lim⟩ :
∃ v : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti v ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < v n) ∧ Tendsto v atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have := fun i => strong_law_aux1 X hint hindep hident hnonneg c_one (v_pos i)
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with ω hω
apply Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε εpos => ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, v i < ε := ((tendsto_order.1 v_lim).2 ε εpos).exists
filter_upwards [hω i] with n hn
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_abs, Nat.abs_cast]
exact hn.le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hi.le (Nat.cast_nonneg _))
include hint hident in
/-- The expectation of the truncated version of `Xᵢ` behaves asymptotically like the whole
expectation. This follows from convergence and Cesàro averaging. -/
theorem strong_law_aux3 :
(fun n => 𝔼[∑ i ∈ range n, truncation (X i) i] - n * 𝔼[X 0]) =o[atTop] ((↑) : ℕ → ℝ) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun i => 𝔼[truncation (X i) i]) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) := by
convert (tendsto_integral_truncation hint).comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop using 1
ext i
exact (hident i).truncation.integral_eq
convert Asymptotics.isLittleO_sum_range_of_tendsto_zero (tendsto_sub_nhds_zero_iff.2 A) using 1
ext1 n
simp only [sum_sub_distrib, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, sum_apply, sub_left_inj]
rw [integral_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_]
exact ((hident i).symm.integrable_snd hint).1.integrable_truncation
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncation of `Xᵢ` up to `i` satisfies the strong law of large numbers
(with respect to the original expectation) along the sequence
`c^n`, for any `c > 1`. This follows from the version from the truncated expectation, and the
fact that the truncated and the original expectations have the same asymptotic behavior. -/
theorem strong_law_aux4 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) :
∀ᵐ ω, (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, truncation (X i) i ω - ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ * 𝔼[X 0]) =o[atTop]
fun n : ℕ => (⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
filter_upwards [strong_law_aux2 X hint hindep hident hnonneg c_one] with ω hω
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ⌊c ^ n⌋₊) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_nat_floor_atTop.comp (tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt c_one)
convert hω.add ((strong_law_aux3 X hint hident).comp_tendsto A) using 1
ext1 n
simp
include hint hident hnonneg in
/-- The truncated and non-truncated versions of `Xᵢ` have the same asymptotic behavior, as they
almost surely coincide at all but finitely many steps. This follows from a probability computation
and Borel-Cantelli. -/
theorem strong_law_aux5 :
∀ᵐ ω, (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range n, truncation (X i) i ω - ∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) =o[atTop]
fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ) := by
have A : (∑' j : ℕ, ℙ {ω | X j ω ∈ Set.Ioi (j : ℝ)}) < ∞ := by
convert tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top hint (hnonneg 0) using 2
ext1 j
exact (hident j).measure_mem_eq measurableSet_Ioi
have B : ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => truncation (X n) n ω - X n ω) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
filter_upwards [ae_eventually_not_mem A.ne] with ω hω
apply tendsto_const_nhds.congr' _
filter_upwards [hω, Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with n hn npos
simp only [truncation, indicator, Set.mem_Ioc, id, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h
· exact (sub_self _).symm
· have : -(n : ℝ) < X n ω := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (hnonneg n ω)
simpa only [Right.neg_neg_iff, Nat.cast_pos] using npos
simp only [this, true_and, not_le] at h
exact (hn h).elim
filter_upwards [B] with ω hω
convert isLittleO_sum_range_of_tendsto_zero hω using 1
ext n
rw [sum_sub_distrib]
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- `Xᵢ` satisfies the strong law of large numbers along the sequence
`c^n`, for any `c > 1`. This follows from the version for the truncated `Xᵢ`, and the fact that
`Xᵢ` and its truncated version have the same asymptotic behavior. -/
theorem strong_law_aux6 {c : ℝ} (c_one : 1 < c) :
∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, X i ω) / ⌊c ^ n⌋₊) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) := by
have H : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ℝ) < ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ := by
intro n
refine zero_lt_one.trans_le ?_
simp only [Nat.one_le_cast, Nat.one_le_floor_iff, one_le_pow₀ c_one.le]
filter_upwards [strong_law_aux4 X hint hindep hident hnonneg c_one,
strong_law_aux5 X hint hident hnonneg] with ω hω h'ω
rw [← tendsto_sub_nhds_zero_iff, ← Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_iff ℝ]
have L : (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range ⌊c ^ n⌋₊, X i ω - ⌊c ^ n⌋₊ * 𝔼[X 0]) =o[atTop] fun n =>
(⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ⌊c ^ n⌋₊) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_nat_floor_atTop.comp (tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt c_one)
convert hω.sub (h'ω.comp_tendsto A) using 1
ext1 n
simp only [Function.comp_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left]
convert L.mul_isBigO (isBigO_refl (fun n : ℕ => (⌊c ^ n⌋₊ : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop) using 1 <;>
(ext1 n; field_simp [(H n).ne'])
include hint hindep hident hnonneg in
/-- `Xᵢ` satisfies the strong law of large numbers along all integers. This follows from the
corresponding fact along the sequences `c^n`, and the fact that any integer can be sandwiched
between `c^n` and `c^(n+1)` with comparably small error if `c` is close enough to `1`
(which is formalized in `tendsto_div_of_monotone_of_tendsto_div_floor_pow`). -/
theorem strong_law_aux7 :
∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) := by
obtain ⟨c, -, cone, clim⟩ :
∃ c : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti c ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 1 < c n) ∧ Tendsto c atTop (𝓝 1) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (1 : ℝ)
have : ∀ k, ∀ᵐ ω,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range ⌊c k ^ n⌋₊, X i ω) / ⌊c k ^ n⌋₊) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[X 0]) :=
fun k => strong_law_aux6 X hint hindep hident hnonneg (cone k)
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with ω hω
apply tendsto_div_of_monotone_of_tendsto_div_floor_pow _ _ _ c cone clim _
· intro m n hmn
exact sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hmn) fun i _ _ => hnonneg i ω
· exact hω
end StrongLawNonneg
/-- **Strong law of large numbers**, almost sure version: if `X n` is a sequence of independent
identically distributed integrable real-valued random variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n`
converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`. We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only
requires pairwise independence. Superseded by `strong_law_ae`, which works for random variables
taking values in any Banach space. -/
theorem strong_law_ae_real {Ω : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
(X : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (hint : Integrable (X 0) μ)
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 μ[X 0]) := by
let mΩ : MeasureSpace Ω := ⟨μ⟩
-- first get rid of the trivial case where the space is not a probability space
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ ω, X 0 ω = 0
· have I : ∀ᵐ ω, ∀ i, X i ω = 0 := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
intro i
exact (hident i).symm.ae_snd (p := fun x ↦ x = 0) measurableSet_eq h
filter_upwards [I] with ω hω
simpa [hω] using (integral_eq_zero_of_ae h).symm
have : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
hint.isProbabilityMeasure_of_indepFun (X 0) (X 1) h (hindep zero_ne_one)
-- then consider separately the positive and the negative part, and apply the result
-- for nonnegative functions to them.
let pos : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => max x 0
let neg : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => max (-x) 0
have posm : Measurable pos := measurable_id'.max measurable_const
have negm : Measurable neg := measurable_id'.neg.max measurable_const
have A : ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, (pos ∘ X i) ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[pos ∘ X 0]) :=
strong_law_aux7 _ hint.pos_part (fun i j hij => (hindep hij).comp posm posm)
(fun i => (hident i).comp posm) fun i ω => le_max_right _ _
have B : ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (∑ i ∈ range n, (neg ∘ X i) ω) / n) atTop (𝓝 𝔼[neg ∘ X 0]) :=
strong_law_aux7 _ hint.neg_part (fun i j hij => (hindep hij).comp negm negm)
(fun i => (hident i).comp negm) fun i ω => le_max_right _ _
filter_upwards [A, B] with ω hωpos hωneg
convert hωpos.sub hωneg using 2
· simp only [pos, neg, ← sub_div, ← sum_sub_distrib, max_zero_sub_max_neg_zero_eq_self,
Function.comp_apply]
· simp only [pos, neg, ← integral_sub hint.pos_part hint.neg_part,
max_zero_sub_max_neg_zero_eq_self, Function.comp_apply, mΩ]
end StrongLawAeReal
section StrongLawVectorSpace
variable {Ω : Type*} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E]
open Set TopologicalSpace
/-- Preliminary lemma for the strong law of large numbers for vector-valued random variables:
the composition of the random variables with a simple function satisfies the strong law of large
numbers. -/
lemma strong_law_ae_simpleFunc_comp (X : ℕ → Ω → E) (h' : Measurable (X 0))
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) (φ : SimpleFunc E E) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, φ (X i ω))) atTop (𝓝 μ[φ ∘ (X 0)]) := by
-- this follows from the one-dimensional version when `φ` takes a single value, and is then
-- extended to the general case by linearity.
classical
refine SimpleFunc.induction (motive := fun ψ ↦ ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, ψ (X i ω))) atTop (𝓝 μ[ψ ∘ (X 0)])) ?_ ?_ φ
· intro c s hs
simp only [SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, SimpleFunc.coe_const,
SimpleFunc.coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator, Function.comp_apply]
let F : E → ℝ := indicator s 1
have F_meas : Measurable F := (measurable_indicator_const_iff 1).2 hs
let Y : ℕ → Ω → ℝ := fun n ↦ F ∘ (X n)
have : ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Y i ω)
atTop (𝓝 μ[Y 0]) := by
simp only [Function.const_one, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
apply strong_law_ae_real
· exact SimpleFunc.integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
((SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const _ (1 : ℝ))
(SimpleFunc.const _ (0 : ℝ))).comp (X 0) h')
· exact fun i j hij ↦ IndepFun.comp (hindep hij) F_meas F_meas
· exact fun i ↦ (hident i).comp F_meas
filter_upwards [this] with ω hω
have I : indicator s (Function.const E c) = (fun x ↦ (indicator s (1 : E → ℝ) x) • c) := by
ext
rw [← indicator_smul_const_apply]
congr! 1
ext
simp
simp only [I, integral_smul_const]
convert Tendsto.smul_const hω c using 1
simp [F, Y, ← sum_smul, smul_smul]
· rintro φ ψ - hφ hψ
filter_upwards [hφ, hψ] with ω hωφ hωψ
convert hωφ.add hωψ using 1
· simp [sum_add_distrib]
· congr 1
rw [← integral_add]
· rfl
· exact (φ.comp (X 0) h').integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
· exact (ψ.comp (X 0) h').integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
variable [BorelSpace E]
/-- Preliminary lemma for the strong law of large numbers for vector-valued random variables,
assuming measurability in addition to integrability. This is weakened to ae measurability in
the full version `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`. -/
lemma strong_law_ae_of_measurable
(X : ℕ → Ω → E) (hint : Integrable (X 0) μ) (h' : StronglyMeasurable (X 0))
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[X 0]) := by
/- Choose a simple function `φ` such that `φ (X 0)` approximates well enough `X 0` -- this is
possible as `X 0` is strongly measurable. Then `φ (X n)` approximates well `X n`.
Then the strong law for `φ (X n)` implies the strong law for `X n`, up to a small
error controlled by `n⁻¹ ∑_{i=0}^{n-1} ‖X i - φ (X i)‖`. This one is also controlled thanks
to the one-dimensional law of large numbers: it converges ae to `𝔼[‖X 0 - φ (X 0)‖]`, which
is arbitrarily small for well chosen `φ`. -/
let s : Set E := Set.range (X 0) ∪ {0}
have zero_s : 0 ∈ s := by simp [s]
have : SeparableSpace s := h'.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
have : Nonempty s := ⟨0, zero_s⟩
-- sequence of approximating simple functions.
let φ : ℕ → SimpleFunc E E :=
SimpleFunc.nearestPt (fun k => Nat.casesOn k 0 ((↑) ∘ denseSeq s) : ℕ → E)
let Y : ℕ → ℕ → Ω → E := fun k i ↦ (φ k) ∘ (X i)
-- strong law for `φ (X n)`
have A : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ k,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, Y k i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[Y k 0]) :=
ae_all_iff.2 (fun k ↦ strong_law_ae_simpleFunc_comp X h'.measurable hindep hident (φ k))
-- strong law for the error `‖X i - φ (X i)‖`
have B : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ k, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (∑ i ∈ range n, ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖) / n)
atTop (𝓝 μ[(fun ω ↦ ‖(X 0 - Y k 0) ω‖)]) := by
apply ae_all_iff.2 (fun k ↦ ?_)
let G : ℕ → E → ℝ := fun k x ↦ ‖x - φ k x‖
have G_meas : ∀ k, Measurable (G k) :=
fun k ↦ (measurable_id.sub_stronglyMeasurable (φ k).stronglyMeasurable).norm
have I : ∀ k i, (fun ω ↦ ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖) = (G k) ∘ (X i) := fun k i ↦ rfl
apply strong_law_ae_real (fun i ω ↦ ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖)
· exact (hint.sub ((φ k).comp (X 0) h'.measurable).integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure).norm
· unfold Function.onFun
simp_rw [I]
intro i j hij
exact (hindep hij).comp (G_meas k) (G_meas k)
· intro i
simp_rw [I]
apply (hident i).comp (G_meas k)
-- check that, when both convergences above hold, then the strong law is satisfied
filter_upwards [A, B] with ω hω h'ω
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero, tendsto_order]
refine ⟨fun c hc ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun n ↦ hc.trans_le (norm_nonneg _)), ?_⟩
-- start with some positive `ε` (the desired precision), and fix `δ` with `3 δ < ε`.
intro ε (εpos : 0 < ε)
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ δ + δ + δ < ε := ⟨ε/4, by positivity, by linarith⟩
-- choose `k` large enough so that `φₖ (X 0)` approximates well enough `X 0`, up to the
-- precision `δ`.
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k, ∫ ω, ‖(X 0 - Y k 0) ω‖ ∂μ < δ := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, norm_sub_rev (X 0 _)]
exact ((tendsto_order.1 (tendsto_integral_norm_approxOn_sub h'.measurable hint)).2 δ
δpos).exists
have : ‖μ[Y k 0] - μ[X 0]‖ < δ := by
rw [norm_sub_rev, ← integral_sub hint]
· exact (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans_lt hk
· exact ((φ k).comp (X 0) h'.measurable).integrable_of_isFiniteMeasure
-- consider `n` large enough for which the above convergences have taken place within `δ`.
have I : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (∑ i ∈ range n, ‖(X i - Y k i) ω‖) / n < δ :=
(tendsto_order.1 (h'ω k)).2 δ hk
have J : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ‖(n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, Y k i ω) - μ[Y k 0]‖ < δ := by
specialize hω k
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero] at hω
exact (tendsto_order.1 hω).2 δ δpos
filter_upwards [I, J] with n hn h'n
-- at such an `n`, the strong law is realized up to `ε`.
calc
‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, X i ω - μ[X 0]‖
= ‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, (X i ω - Y k i ω) +
((n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Y k i ω - μ[Y k 0]) + (μ[Y k 0] - μ[X 0])‖ := by
congr
simp only [Function.comp_apply, sum_sub_distrib, smul_sub]
abel
_ ≤ ‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, (X i ω - Y k i ω)‖ +
‖(n : ℝ)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, Y k i ω - μ[Y k 0]‖ + ‖μ[Y k 0] - μ[X 0]‖ :=
norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, ‖X i ω - Y k i ω‖) / n + δ + δ := by
gcongr
simp only [Function.comp_apply, norm_smul, norm_inv, RCLike.norm_natCast,
div_eq_inv_mul, inv_pos, Nat.cast_pos, inv_lt_zero]
gcongr
exact norm_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ δ + δ + δ := by
gcongr
exact hn.le
_ < ε := hδ
omit [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] in
/-- **Strong law of large numbers**, almost sure version: if `X n` is a sequence of independent
identically distributed integrable random variables taking values in a Banach space,
then `n⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ range n, X i` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`. We give here the strong
version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence. -/
theorem strong_law_ae (X : ℕ → Ω → E) (hint : Integrable (X 0) μ)
(hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[X 0]) := by
-- First exclude the trivial case where the space is not a probability space
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, X 0 ω = 0
· have I : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, X i ω = 0 := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
intro i
exact (hident i).symm.ae_snd (p := fun x ↦ x = 0) measurableSet_eq h
filter_upwards [I] with ω hω
simpa [hω] using (integral_eq_zero_of_ae h).symm
have : IsProbabilityMeasure μ :=
hint.isProbabilityMeasure_of_indepFun (X 0) (X 1) h (hindep zero_ne_one)
-- we reduce to the case of strongly measurable random variables, by using `Y i` which is strongly
-- measurable and ae equal to `X i`.
have A : ∀ i, Integrable (X i) μ := fun i ↦ (hident i).integrable_iff.2 hint
let Y : ℕ → Ω → E := fun i ↦ (A i).1.mk (X i)
have B : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ n, X n ω = Y n ω :=
ae_all_iff.2 (fun i ↦ AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (A i).1)
have Yint : Integrable (Y 0) μ := Integrable.congr hint (AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (A 0).1)
have C : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, Y i ω)) atTop (𝓝 μ[Y 0]) := by
apply strong_law_ae_of_measurable Y Yint ((A 0).1.stronglyMeasurable_mk)
(fun i j hij ↦ IndepFun.congr (hindep hij) (A i).1.ae_eq_mk (A j).1.ae_eq_mk)
(fun i ↦ ((A i).1.identDistrib_mk.symm.trans (hident i)).trans (A 0).1.identDistrib_mk)
filter_upwards [B, C] with ω h₁ h₂
have : μ[X 0] = μ[Y 0] := integral_congr_ae (AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (A 0).1)
rw [this]
apply Tendsto.congr (fun n ↦ ?_) h₂
congr with i
exact (h₁ i).symm
end StrongLawVectorSpace
| section StrongLawLp
variable {Ω : Type*} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
/-- **Strong law of large numbers**, Lᵖ version: if `X n` is a sequence of independent
identically distributed random variables in Lᵖ, then `n⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ range n, X i`
converges in `Lᵖ` to `𝔼[X 0]`. -/
theorem strong_law_Lp {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (X : ℕ → Ω → E)
(hℒp : MemLp (X 0) p μ) (hindep : Pairwise ((IndepFun · · μ) on X))
(hident : ∀ i, IdentDistrib (X i) (X 0) μ μ) :
Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => eLpNorm (fun ω => (n : ℝ) ⁻¹ • (∑ i ∈ range n, X i ω) - μ[X 0]) p μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
-- First exclude the trivial case where the space is not a probability space
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, X 0 ω = 0
· have I : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, X i ω = 0 := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
intro i
exact (hident i).symm.ae_snd (p := fun x ↦ x = 0) measurableSet_eq h
| Mathlib/Probability/StrongLaw.lean | 830 | 849 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hy, _, hy, ?_⟩
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_one]; simp
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_zero]; simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, vsub_self]
module
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₃₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide z x :=
h.symm.wOppSide₁₃ hy
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
@[simp]
theorem wOppSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} : s.WOppSide x x ↔ x ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, -, -, -, h₁, -⟩ := h.exists_eq_smul_add
rw [add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at h₁
rw [h₁]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem a hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact fun h => ⟨x, h, x, h, SameRay.rfl⟩
theorem not_sOppSide_self (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x : P) : ¬s.SOppSide x x := by
rw [SOppSide]
simp
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← hr, smul_smul, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr₂.ne.symm,
← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wSameSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [SSameSide, and_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_iff_exists_left h, ← and_assoc, and_comm (a := y ∉ s), and_assoc]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(-r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right x p₁ p₁']
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) hr
ring
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wOppSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h]
constructor
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_right h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
and_congr_right_iff]
rintro _ hy
rw [or_iff_right hy]
theorem WSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SSameSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sSameSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.wSameSide.trans_sSameSide hyz, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem SSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.wSameSide.trans_wOppSide hyz hxy.2.2
theorem SSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem WOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_wOppSide hxy.symm hy).symm
theorem WOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wSameSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
rw [← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at hyz
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h ▸ hp₂)
theorem WOppSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WSameSide x y ∧ s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ y ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ho⟩
rw [wOppSide_comm] at ho
by_contra h
rw [not_or] at h
exact h.1 (wOppSide_self_iff.1 (hs.trans_wOppSide ho h.2))
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_left_mem y h, wOppSide_of_left_mem y h⟩
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_right_mem x h, wOppSide_of_right_mem x h⟩
theorem WSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h, ho.1⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact ho.2.1 hx
· exact ho.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.WOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h.1, ho⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact h.2.1 hx
· exact h.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y :=
fun ho => h.not_wOppSide ho.1
theorem WOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_wOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.WSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_sOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => h.not_wSameSide hs.1
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, Wbtw R x p y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨p, hp, h⟩ => h.wOppSide₁₃ hp⟩
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h]
exact ⟨p₁, hp₁, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [← h]
exact ⟨p₂, hp₂, wbtw_self_right _ _ _⟩
· refine ⟨lineMap x y (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)), ?_, ?_⟩
· have : (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (y -ᵥ p₂ + (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) - (x -ᵥ p₁)) + (x -ᵥ p₁) =
(r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ y]
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) (r₁ + r₂)⁻¹ • h
rw [lineMap_apply, ← vsub_vadd x p₁, ← vsub_vadd y p₂, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc,
← vadd_assoc, vadd_eq_add, this]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _
⟨by positivity,
div_le_one_of_le₀ (le_add_of_nonneg_left hr₁.le) (Left.add_pos hr₁ hr₂).le⟩
theorem SOppSide.exists_sbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
∃ p ∈ s, Sbtw R x p y := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hw⟩ := wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw.1 h.wOppSide
refine ⟨p, hp, hw, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.1 hp
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.2 hp
theorem _root_.Sbtw.sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P}
(h : Sbtw R x y z) (hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : s.SOppSide x z := by
refine ⟨h.wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ hy, hx, fun hz => hx ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rw [lineMap_apply] at hy
have ht : t ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
simp [lineMap_apply] at hyz
have hy' := vsub_mem_direction hy hz
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, ← neg_one_smul R (z -ᵥ x), ← add_smul,
← sub_eq_add_neg, s.direction.smul_mem_iff (sub_ne_zero_of_ne ht)] at hy'
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy')] at hy
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne.symm,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sSameSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sOppSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ici 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ici]
constructor
· rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, (div_pos hr₁ hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ioi 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ioi]
| constructor
· rw [sSameSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, div_pos hr₁ hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_wOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iic 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iic]
constructor
· rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 673 | 695 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Simple functions
A function `f` from a measurable space to any type is called *simple*, if every preimage `f ⁻¹' {x}`
is measurable, and the range is finite. In this file, we define simple functions and establish their
basic properties; and we construct a sequence of simple functions approximating an arbitrary Borel
measurable function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
The theorem `Measurable.ennreal_induction` shows that in order to prove something for an arbitrary
measurable function into `ℝ≥0∞`, it is sufficient to show that the property holds for (multiples of)
characteristic functions and is closed under addition and supremum of increasing sequences of
functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- A function `f` from a measurable space to any type is called *simple*,
if every preimage `f ⁻¹' {x}` is measurable, and the range is finite. This structure bundles
a function with these properties. -/
structure SimpleFunc.{u, v} (α : Type u) [MeasurableSpace α] (β : Type v) where
/-- The underlying function -/
toFun : α → β
measurableSet_fiber' : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (toFun ⁻¹' {x})
finite_range' : (Set.range toFun).Finite
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →ₛ β) α β where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem coe_injective ⦃f g : α →ₛ β⦄ (H : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g := DFunLike.ext' H
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ₛ β} (H : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g := DFunLike.ext _ _ H
theorem finite_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (Set.range f).Finite :=
f.finite_range'
theorem measurableSet_fiber (f : α →ₛ β) (x : β) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
f.measurableSet_fiber' x
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f : α → β) (h h') : ⇑(mk f h h') = f := rfl
theorem apply_mk (f : α → β) (h h') (x : α) : SimpleFunc.mk f h h' x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Simple function defined on a finite type. -/
def ofFinite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : α →ₛ β where
toFun := f
measurableSet_fiber' x := (toFinite (f ⁻¹' {x})).measurableSet
finite_range' := Set.finite_range f
/-- Simple function defined on the empty type. -/
def ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : α →ₛ β := ofFinite isEmptyElim
/-- Range of a simple function `α →ₛ β` as a `Finset β`. -/
protected def range (f : α →ₛ β) : Finset β :=
f.finite_range.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {b} : b ∈ f.range ↔ b ∈ range f :=
Finite.mem_toFinset _
theorem mem_range_self (f : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : f x ∈ f.range :=
mem_range.2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (↑f.range : Set β) = Set.range f :=
f.finite_range.coe_toFinset
theorem mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero {f : α →ₛ β} {x : β} {μ : Measure α} (H : μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) ≠ 0) :
x ∈ f.range :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero H
mem_range.2 ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem forall_mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) := by
simp only [mem_range, Set.forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_range_iff {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) := by
simpa only [mem_range, exists_prop] using Set.exists_range_iff
theorem preimage_eq_empty_iff (f : α →ₛ β) (b : β) : f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ↔ b ∉ f.range :=
preimage_singleton_eq_empty.trans <| not_congr mem_range.symm
theorem exists_forall_le [Nonempty β] [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] (f : α →ₛ β) :
∃ C, ∀ x, f x ≤ C :=
f.range.exists_le.imp fun _ => forall_mem_range.1
/-- Constant function as a `SimpleFunc`. -/
def const (α) {β} [MeasurableSpace α] (b : β) : α →ₛ β :=
⟨fun _ => b, fun _ => MeasurableSet.const _, finite_range_const⟩
instance instInhabited [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨const _ default⟩
theorem const_apply (a : α) (b : β) : (const α b) a = b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const (α) [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty α] (b : β) : (const α b).range = {b} :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp +unfoldPartialApp [Function.const]
theorem range_const_subset (α) [MeasurableSpace α] (b : β) : (const α b).range ⊆ {b} :=
Finset.coe_subset.1 <| by simp
theorem simpleFunc_bot {α} (f : @SimpleFunc α ⊥ β) [Nonempty β] : ∃ c, ∀ x, f x = c := by
have hf_meas := @SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber α _ ⊥ f
simp_rw [MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_bot_iff] at hf_meas
exact (exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton hf_meas).imp fun c hc ↦ congr_fun hc
theorem simpleFunc_bot' {α} [Nonempty β] (f : @SimpleFunc α ⊥ β) :
∃ c, f = @SimpleFunc.const α _ ⊥ c :=
letI : MeasurableSpace α := ⊥; (simpleFunc_bot f).imp fun _ ↦ ext
theorem measurableSet_cut (r : α → β → Prop) (f : α →ₛ β) (h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet { a | r a b }) :
MeasurableSet { a | r a (f a) } := by
have : { a | r a (f a) } = ⋃ b ∈ range f, { a | r a b } ∩ f ⁻¹' {b} := by
ext a
suffices r a (f a) ↔ ∃ i, r a (f i) ∧ f a = f i by simpa
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ⟨h, rfl⟩⟩, fun ⟨a', ⟨h', e⟩⟩ => e.symm ▸ h'⟩
rw [this]
exact
MeasurableSet.biUnion f.finite_range.countable fun b _ =>
MeasurableSet.inter (h b) (f.measurableSet_fiber _)
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (s) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) :=
measurableSet_cut (fun _ b => b ∈ s) f fun b => MeasurableSet.const (b ∈ s)
/-- A simple function is measurable -/
@[measurability, fun_prop]
protected theorem measurable [MeasurableSpace β] (f : α →ₛ β) : Measurable f := fun s _ =>
measurableSet_preimage f s
@[measurability]
protected theorem aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure α} (f : α →ₛ β) :
AEMeasurable f μ :=
f.measurable.aemeasurable
protected theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) {μ : Measure α} (s : Finset β) :
(∑ y ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) :=
sum_measure_preimage_singleton _ fun _ _ => f.measurableSet_fiber _
theorem sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (μ : Measure α) :
(∑ y ∈ f.range, μ (f ⁻¹' {y})) = μ univ := by
rw [f.sum_measure_preimage_singleton, coe_range, preimage_range]
open scoped Classical in
/-- If-then-else as a `SimpleFunc`. -/
def piecewise (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ β :=
⟨s.piecewise f g, fun _ =>
letI : MeasurableSpace β := ⊤
f.measurable.piecewise hs g.measurable trivial,
(f.finite_range.union g.finite_range).subset range_ite_subset⟩
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem coe_piecewise {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) :
⇑(piecewise s hs f g) = s.piecewise f g :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
theorem piecewise_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f g : α →ₛ β) (a) :
piecewise s hs f g a = if a ∈ s then f a else g a :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_compl {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet sᶜ) (f g : α →ₛ β) :
piecewise sᶜ hs f g = piecewise s hs.of_compl g f :=
coe_injective <| by simp [hs]
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_univ (f g : α →ₛ β) : piecewise univ MeasurableSet.univ f g = f :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_empty (f g : α →ₛ β) : piecewise ∅ MeasurableSet.empty f g = g :=
coe_injective <| by simp
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem piecewise_same (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s hs f f = f :=
coe_injective <| Set.piecewise_same _ _
theorem support_indicator [Zero β] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α →ₛ β) :
Function.support (f.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const α 0)) = s ∩ Function.support f :=
Set.support_indicator
open scoped Classical in
theorem range_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hs_nonempty : s.Nonempty)
(hs_ne_univ : s ≠ univ) (x y : β) :
(piecewise s hs (const α x) (const α y)).range = {x, y} := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_inj, coe_range, coe_piecewise, range_piecewise, coe_const,
Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_singleton, hs_nonempty.image_const,
(nonempty_compl.2 hs_ne_univ).image_const, singleton_union, Function.const]
theorem measurable_bind [MeasurableSpace γ] (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α → γ)
(hg : ∀ b, Measurable (g b)) : Measurable fun a => g (f a) a := fun s hs =>
f.measurableSet_cut (fun a b => g b a ∈ s) fun b => hg b hs
/-- If `f : α →ₛ β` is a simple function and `g : β → α →ₛ γ` is a family of simple functions,
then `f.bind g` binds the first argument of `g` to `f`. In other words, `f.bind g a = g (f a) a`. -/
def bind (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α →ₛ γ) : α →ₛ γ :=
⟨fun a => g (f a) a, fun c =>
f.measurableSet_cut (fun a b => g b a = c) fun b => (g b).measurableSet_preimage {c},
(f.finite_range.biUnion fun b _ => (g b).finite_range).subset <| by
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩; simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → α →ₛ γ) (a) : f.bind g a = g (f a) a :=
rfl
/-- Given a function `g : β → γ` and a simple function `f : α →ₛ β`, `f.map g` return the simple
function `g ∘ f : α →ₛ γ` -/
def map (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ γ :=
bind f (const α ∘ g)
theorem map_apply (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a) : f.map g a = g (f a) :=
rfl
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (h : γ → δ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g).map h = f.map (h ∘ g) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g : α → γ) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_map [DecidableEq γ] (g : β → γ) (f : α →ₛ β) : (f.map g).range = f.range.image g :=
Finset.coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_range, coe_map, Finset.coe_image, range_comp]
@[simp]
theorem map_const (g : β → γ) (b : β) : (const α b).map g = const α (g b) :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
theorem map_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → γ) (s : Set γ) :
f.map g ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' ↑{b ∈ f.range | g b ∈ s} := by
simp only [coe_range, sep_mem_eq, coe_map, Finset.coe_filter,
← mem_preimage, inter_comm, preimage_inter_range, ← Finset.mem_coe]
exact preimage_comp
open scoped Classical in
theorem map_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (g : β → γ) (c : γ) :
f.map g ⁻¹' {c} = f ⁻¹' ↑{b ∈ f.range | g b = c} :=
map_preimage _ _ _
/-- Composition of a `SimpleFun` and a measurable function is a `SimpleFunc`. -/
def comp [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) (g : α → β) (hgm : Measurable g) : α →ₛ γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
finite_range' := f.finite_range.subset <| Set.range_comp_subset_range _ _
measurableSet_fiber' z := hgm (f.measurableSet_fiber z)
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hgm : Measurable g) :
⇑(f.comp g hgm) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
theorem range_comp_subset_range [MeasurableSpace β] (f : β →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hgm : Measurable g) :
(f.comp g hgm).range ⊆ f.range :=
Finset.coe_subset.1 <| by simp only [coe_range, coe_comp, Set.range_comp_subset_range]
/-- Extend a `SimpleFunc` along a measurable embedding: `f₁.extend g hg f₂` is the function
`F : β →ₛ γ` such that `F ∘ g = f₁` and `F y = f₂ y` whenever `y ∉ range g`. -/
def extend [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) (g : α → β) (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : β →ₛ γ where
toFun := Function.extend g f₁ f₂
finite_range' :=
(f₁.finite_range.union <| f₂.finite_range.subset (image_subset_range _ _)).subset
(range_extend_subset _ _ _)
measurableSet_fiber' := by
letI : MeasurableSpace γ := ⊤; haveI : MeasurableSingletonClass γ := ⟨fun _ => trivial⟩
exact fun x => hg.measurable_extend f₁.measurable f₂.measurable (measurableSet_singleton _)
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) (x : α) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂) (g x) = f₁ x :=
hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply' [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) {y : β} (h : ¬∃ x, g x = y) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂) y = f₂ y :=
Function.extend_apply' _ _ _ h
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp_eq' [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : f₁.extend g hg f₂ ∘ g = f₁ :=
funext fun _ => extend_apply _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem extend_comp_eq [MeasurableSpace β] (f₁ : α →ₛ γ) {g : α → β} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
(f₂ : β →ₛ γ) : (f₁.extend g hg f₂).comp g hg.measurable = f₁ :=
coe_injective <| extend_comp_eq' _ hg _
/-- If `f` is a simple function taking values in `β → γ` and `g` is another simple function
with the same domain and codomain `β`, then `f.seq g = f a (g a)`. -/
def seq (f : α →ₛ β → γ) (g : α →ₛ β) : α →ₛ γ :=
f.bind fun f => g.map f
@[simp]
theorem seq_apply (f : α →ₛ β → γ) (g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : f.seq g a = f a (g a) :=
rfl
/-- Combine two simple functions `f : α →ₛ β` and `g : α →ₛ β`
into `fun a => (f a, g a)`. -/
def pair (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) : α →ₛ β × γ :=
(f.map Prod.mk).seq g
@[simp]
theorem pair_apply (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (a) : pair f g a = (f a, g a) :=
rfl
theorem pair_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (s : Set β) (t : Set γ) :
pair f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
-- A special form of `pair_preimage`
theorem pair_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) (b : β) (c : γ) :
pair f g ⁻¹' {(b, c)} = f ⁻¹' {b} ∩ g ⁻¹' {c} := by
rw [← singleton_prod_singleton]
exact pair_preimage _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem map_fst_pair (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) : (f.pair g).map Prod.fst = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_snd_pair (f : α →ₛ β) (g : α →ₛ γ) : (f.pair g).map Prod.snd = g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind_const (f : α →ₛ β) : f.bind (const α) = f := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
instance instOne [One β] : One (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨const α 1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance instMul [Mul β] : Mul (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· * ·)).seq g⟩
@[to_additive]
instance instDiv [Div β] : Div (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· / ·)).seq g⟩
@[to_additive]
instance instInv [Inv β] : Inv (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f => f.map Inv.inv⟩
instance instSup [Max β] : Max (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· ⊔ ·)).seq g⟩
instance instInf [Min β] : Min (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.map (· ⊓ ·)).seq g⟩
instance instLE [LE β] : LE (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun f g => ∀ a, f a ≤ g a⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem const_one [One β] : const α (1 : β) = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one [One β] : ⇑(1 : α →ₛ β) = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul [Mul β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f * g) = ⇑f * ⇑g :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv [Inv β] (f : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f⁻¹) = (⇑f)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div [Div β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f / g) = ⇑f / ⇑g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le [LE β] {f g : α →ₛ β} : (f : α → β) ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup [Max β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = ⇑f ⊔ ⇑g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf [Min β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = ⇑f ⊓ ⇑g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_apply [Mul β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f * g) a = f a * g a :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_apply [Div β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : (f / g) x = f x / g x :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_apply [Inv β] (f : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : f⁻¹ x = (f x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply [Max β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a :=
rfl
theorem inf_apply [Min β] (f g : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem range_one [Nonempty α] [One β] : (1 : α →ₛ β).range = {1} :=
Finset.ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_of_isEmpty {β} [hα : IsEmpty α] (f : α →ₛ β) : f.range = ∅ := by
rw [← Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
by_contra h
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem⟩ := h
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range, Set.mem_range] at hy_mem
obtain ⟨x, hxy⟩ := hy_mem
rw [isEmpty_iff] at hα
exact hα x
theorem eq_zero_of_mem_range_zero [Zero β] : ∀ {y : β}, y ∈ (0 : α →ₛ β).range → y = 0 :=
@(forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => rfl)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_map₂ [Mul β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : f * g = (pair f g).map fun p : β × β => p.1 * p.2 :=
rfl
theorem sup_eq_map₂ [Max β] (f g : α →ₛ β) : f ⊔ g = (pair f g).map fun p : β × β => p.1 ⊔ p.2 :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem const_mul_eq_map [Mul β] (f : α →ₛ β) (b : β) : const α b * f = f.map fun a => b * a :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul [Mul β] [Mul γ] {g : β → γ} (hg : ∀ x y, g (x * y) = g x * g y) (f₁ f₂ : α →ₛ β) :
(f₁ * f₂).map g = f₁.map g * f₂.map g :=
ext fun _ => hg _ _
variable {K : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance instSMul [SMul K β] : SMul K (α →ₛ β) :=
⟨fun k f => f.map (k • ·)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_smul [SMul K β] (c : K) (f : α →ₛ β) : ⇑(c • f) = c • ⇑f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_apply [SMul K β] (k : K) (f : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (k • f) a = k • f a :=
rfl
instance hasNatSMul [AddMonoid β] : SMul ℕ (α →ₛ β) := inferInstance
@[to_additive existing hasNatSMul]
instance hasNatPow [Monoid β] : Pow (α →ₛ β) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n => f.map (· ^ n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_pow [Monoid β] (f : α →ₛ β) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (⇑f) ^ n :=
rfl
theorem pow_apply [Monoid β] (n : ℕ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ^ n) a = f a ^ n :=
rfl
instance hasIntPow [DivInvMonoid β] : Pow (α →ₛ β) ℤ :=
⟨fun f n => f.map (· ^ n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zpow [DivInvMonoid β] (f : α →ₛ β) (z : ℤ) : ⇑(f ^ z) = (⇑f) ^ z :=
rfl
theorem zpow_apply [DivInvMonoid β] (z : ℤ) (f : α →ₛ β) (a : α) : (f ^ z) a = f a ^ z :=
rfl
-- TODO: work out how to generate these instances with `to_additive`, which gets confused by the
-- argument order swap between `coe_smul` and `coe_pow`.
section Additive
instance instAddMonoid [AddMonoid β] : AddMonoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addMonoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid β] : AddCommMonoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addCommMonoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instAddGroup [AddGroup β] : AddGroup (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add coe_neg
coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instAddCommGroup [AddCommGroup β] : AddCommGroup (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
end Additive
@[to_additive existing]
instance instMonoid [Monoid β] : Monoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.monoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
@[to_additive existing]
instance instCommMonoid [CommMonoid β] : CommMonoid (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.commMonoid (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
@[to_additive existing]
instance instGroup [Group β] : Group (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.group (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_inv
coe_div coe_pow coe_zpow
@[to_additive existing]
instance instCommGroup [CommGroup β] : CommGroup (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.commGroup (fun f => show α → β from f) coe_injective coe_one coe_mul coe_inv
coe_div coe_pow coe_zpow
instance instModule [Semiring K] [AddCommMonoid β] [Module K β] : Module K (α →ₛ β) :=
Function.Injective.module K ⟨⟨fun f => show α → β from f, coe_zero⟩, coe_add⟩
coe_injective coe_smul
theorem smul_eq_map [SMul K β] (k : K) (f : α →ₛ β) : k • f = f.map (k • ·) :=
rfl
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ : α →ₛ β} {hs : MeasurableSet s}
instance instPreorder : Preorder (α →ₛ β) := Preorder.lift (⇑)
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : ⇑f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g := .rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : ⇑f < g ↔ f < g := .rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_le_mk {f g : α → β} {hf hg hf' hg'} : mk f hf hf' ≤ mk g hg hg' ↔ f ≤ g := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_mk {f g : α → β} {hf hg hf' hg'} : mk f hf hf' < mk g hg hg' ↔ f < g := Iff.rfl
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mk_le_mk⟩ := mk_le_mk
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mk_lt_mk⟩ := mk_lt_mk
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.coe_le_coe⟩ := coe_le_coe
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.coe_lt_coe⟩ := coe_lt_coe
open scoped Classical in
@[gcongr]
lemma piecewise_mono (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f₁ a ≤ f₂ a) (hg : ∀ a ∉ s, g₁ a ≤ g₂ a) :
piecewise s hs f₁ g₁ ≤ piecewise s hs f₂ g₂ := Set.piecewise_mono hf hg
end Preorder
instance instPartialOrder [PartialOrder β] : PartialOrder (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instPreorder with
le_antisymm := fun _f _g hfg hgf => ext fun a => le_antisymm (hfg a) (hgf a) }
instance instOrderBot [LE β] [OrderBot β] : OrderBot (α →ₛ β) where
bot := const α ⊥
bot_le _ _ := bot_le
instance instOrderTop [LE β] [OrderTop β] : OrderTop (α →ₛ β) where
top := const α ⊤
le_top _ _ := le_top
@[to_additive]
instance [CommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedMonoid β] :
IsOrderedMonoid (α →ₛ β) where
mul_le_mul_left _ _ h _ _ := mul_le_mul_left' (h _) _
instance instSemilatticeInf [SemilatticeInf β] : SemilatticeInf (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instPartialOrder with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => inf_le_right
le_inf := fun _f _g _h hfh hgh a => le_inf (hfh a) (hgh a) }
instance instSemilatticeSup [SemilatticeSup β] : SemilatticeSup (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instPartialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ => le_sup_left
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ => le_sup_right
sup_le := fun _f _g _h hfh hgh a => sup_le (hfh a) (hgh a) }
instance instLattice [Lattice β] : Lattice (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instSemilatticeSup, SimpleFunc.instSemilatticeInf with }
instance instBoundedOrder [LE β] [BoundedOrder β] : BoundedOrder (α →ₛ β) :=
{ SimpleFunc.instOrderBot, SimpleFunc.instOrderTop with }
theorem finset_sup_apply [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] {f : γ → α →ₛ β} (s : Finset γ) (a : α) :
s.sup f a = s.sup fun c => f c a := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s rfl ?_
intro a s _ ih
rw [Finset.sup_insert, Finset.sup_insert, sup_apply, ih]
section Restrict
variable [Zero β]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Restrict a simple function `f : α →ₛ β` to a set `s`. If `s` is measurable,
then `f.restrict s a = if a ∈ s then f a else 0`, otherwise `f.restrict s = const α 0`. -/
def restrict (f : α →ₛ β) (s : Set α) : α →ₛ β :=
if hs : MeasurableSet s then piecewise s hs f 0 else 0
theorem restrict_of_not_measurable {f : α →ₛ β} {s : Set α} (hs : ¬MeasurableSet s) :
restrict f s = 0 :=
dif_neg hs
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrict (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
⇑(restrict f s) = indicator s f := by
classical
rw [restrict, dif_pos hs, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ (f : α →ₛ β) : restrict f univ = f := by simp [restrict]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty (f : α →ₛ β) : restrict f ∅ = 0 := by simp [restrict]
open scoped Classical in
theorem map_restrict_of_zero [Zero γ] {g : β → γ} (hg : g 0 = 0) (f : α →ₛ β) (s : Set α) :
(f.restrict s).map g = (f.map g).restrict s :=
ext fun x =>
if hs : MeasurableSet s then by simp [hs, Set.indicator_comp_of_zero hg]
else by simp [restrict_of_not_measurable hs, hg]
theorem map_coe_ennreal_restrict (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (s : Set α) :
(f.restrict s).map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) = (f.map (↑)).restrict s :=
map_restrict_of_zero ENNReal.coe_zero _ _
theorem map_coe_nnreal_restrict (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (s : Set α) :
(f.restrict s).map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) = (f.map (↑)).restrict s :=
map_restrict_of_zero NNReal.coe_zero _ _
theorem restrict_apply (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a) :
restrict f s a = indicator s f a := by simp only [f.coe_restrict hs]
theorem restrict_preimage (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) : restrict f s ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp [hs, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem _ _ ht, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_preimage_singleton (f : α →ₛ β) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {r : β}
(hr : r ≠ 0) : restrict f s ⁻¹' {r} = s ∩ f ⁻¹' {r} :=
f.restrict_preimage hs hr.symm
theorem mem_restrict_range {r : β} {s : Set α} {f : α →ₛ β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
r ∈ (restrict f s).range ↔ r = 0 ∧ s ≠ univ ∨ r ∈ f '' s := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe, coe_range, coe_restrict _ hs, mem_range_indicator]
open scoped Classical in
theorem mem_image_of_mem_range_restrict {r : β} {s : Set α} {f : α →ₛ β}
(hr : r ∈ (restrict f s).range) (h0 : r ≠ 0) : r ∈ f '' s :=
if hs : MeasurableSet s then by simpa [mem_restrict_range hs, h0, -mem_range] using hr
else by
rw [restrict_of_not_measurable hs] at hr
exact (h0 <| eq_zero_of_mem_range_zero hr).elim
open scoped Classical in
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem restrict_mono [Preorder β] (s : Set α) {f g : α →ₛ β} (H : f ≤ g) :
f.restrict s ≤ g.restrict s :=
if hs : MeasurableSet s then fun x => by
simp only [coe_restrict _ hs, indicator_le_indicator (H x)]
else by simp only [restrict_of_not_measurable hs, le_refl]
end Restrict
section Approx
section
variable [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] [Zero β]
/-- Fix a sequence `i : ℕ → β`. Given a function `α → β`, its `n`-th approximation
by simple functions is defined so that in case `β = ℝ≥0∞` it sends each `a` to the supremum
of the set `{i k | k ≤ n ∧ i k ≤ f a}`, see `approx_apply` and `iSup_approx_apply` for details. -/
def approx (i : ℕ → β) (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) : α →ₛ β :=
(Finset.range n).sup fun k => restrict (const α (i k)) { a : α | i k ≤ f a }
open scoped Classical in
theorem approx_apply [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] {i : ℕ → β} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ} (a : α) (hf : Measurable f) :
(approx i f n : α →ₛ β) a = (Finset.range n).sup fun k => if i k ≤ f a then i k else 0 := by
dsimp only [approx]
rw [finset_sup_apply]
congr
funext k
rw [restrict_apply]
· simp only [coe_const, mem_setOf_eq, indicator_apply, Function.const_apply]
· exact hf measurableSet_Ici
theorem monotone_approx (i : ℕ → β) (f : α → β) : Monotone (approx i f) := fun _ _ h =>
Finset.sup_mono <| Finset.range_subset.2 h
theorem approx_comp [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] {i : ℕ → β} {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} {n : ℕ} (a : α)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
(approx i (f ∘ g) n : α →ₛ β) a = (approx i f n : γ →ₛ β) (g a) := by
rw [approx_apply _ hf, approx_apply _ (hf.comp hg), Function.comp_apply]
end
theorem iSup_approx_apply [TopologicalSpace β] [CompleteLattice β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [Zero β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (i : ℕ → β) (f : α → β) (a : α) (hf : Measurable f)
(h_zero : (0 : β) = ⊥) : ⨆ n, (approx i f n : α →ₛ β) a = ⨆ (k) (_ : i k ≤ f a), i k := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun k => iSup_le fun hk => ?_)
· rw [approx_apply a hf, h_zero]
refine Finset.sup_le fun k _ => ?_
split_ifs with h
· exact le_iSup_of_le k (le_iSup (fun _ : i k ≤ f a => i k) h)
· exact bot_le
· refine le_iSup_of_le (k + 1) ?_
rw [approx_apply a hf]
have : k ∈ Finset.range (k + 1) := Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (Finset.le_sup this)
rw [if_pos hk]
end Approx
section EApprox
variable {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- A sequence of `ℝ≥0∞`s such that its range is the set of non-negative rational numbers. -/
def ennrealRatEmbed (n : ℕ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
ENNReal.ofReal ((Encodable.decode (α := ℚ) n).getD (0 : ℚ))
theorem ennrealRatEmbed_encode (q : ℚ) :
ennrealRatEmbed (Encodable.encode q) = Real.toNNReal q := by
rw [ennrealRatEmbed, Encodable.encodek]; rfl
/-- Approximate a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` by a sequence of simple functions. -/
def eapprox : (α → ℝ≥0∞) → ℕ → α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ :=
approx ennrealRatEmbed
theorem eapprox_lt_top (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : eapprox f n a < ∞ := by
simp only [eapprox, approx, finset_sup_apply, Finset.mem_range, ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, restrict]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff (α := ℝ≥0∞) WithTop.top_pos]
intro b _
split_ifs
· simp only [coe_zero, coe_piecewise, piecewise_eq_indicator, coe_const]
calc
{ a : α | ennrealRatEmbed b ≤ f a }.indicator (fun _ => ennrealRatEmbed b) a ≤
ennrealRatEmbed b :=
indicator_le_self _ _ a
_ < ⊤ := ENNReal.coe_lt_top
· exact WithTop.top_pos
@[mono]
theorem monotone_eapprox (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : Monotone (eapprox f) :=
monotone_approx _ f
@[gcongr]
lemma eapprox_mono {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : eapprox f m ≤ eapprox f n := monotone_eapprox _ hmn
lemma iSup_eapprox_apply (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) : ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) a = f a := by
rw [eapprox, iSup_approx_apply ennrealRatEmbed f a hf rfl]
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun hi => hi) (le_of_not_gt ?_)
intro h
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn.1 h with ⟨q, _, lt_q, q_lt⟩
have :
(Real.toNNReal q : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ⨆ (k : ℕ) (_ : ennrealRatEmbed k ≤ f a), ennrealRatEmbed k := by
refine le_iSup_of_le (Encodable.encode q) ?_
rw [ennrealRatEmbed_encode q]
exact le_iSup_of_le (le_of_lt q_lt) le_rfl
exact lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt this lt_q)
lemma iSup_coe_eapprox (hf : Measurable f) : ⨆ n, ⇑(eapprox f n) = f := by
simpa [funext_iff] using iSup_eapprox_apply hf
theorem eapprox_comp [MeasurableSpace γ] {f : γ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → γ} {n : ℕ} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : (eapprox (f ∘ g) n : α → ℝ≥0∞) = (eapprox f n : γ →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) ∘ g :=
funext fun a => approx_comp a hf hg
lemma tendsto_eapprox {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : Measurable f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ eapprox f n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a)) := by
nth_rw 2 [← iSup_coe_eapprox hf_meas]
rw [iSup_apply]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun _ _ hnm ↦ monotone_eapprox f hnm a
/-- Approximate a function `α → ℝ≥0∞` by a series of simple functions taking their values
in `ℝ≥0`. -/
def eapproxDiff (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℕ → α →ₛ ℝ≥0
| 0 => (eapprox f 0).map ENNReal.toNNReal
| n + 1 => (eapprox f (n + 1) - eapprox f n).map ENNReal.toNNReal
theorem sum_eapproxDiff (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(∑ k ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (eapproxDiff f k a : ℝ≥0∞)) = eapprox f n a := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [Nat.zero_add, Finset.sum_singleton, Finset.range_one]
rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, IH, eapproxDiff, coe_map, Function.comp_apply,
coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le (monotone_eapprox f (Nat.le_succ _) _)]
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt _ (eapprox_lt_top f (n + 1) a)).ne
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
exact le_self_add
theorem tsum_eapproxDiff (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
(∑' n, (eapproxDiff f n a : ℝ≥0∞)) = f a := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat' (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1), sum_eapproxDiff,
iSup_eapprox_apply hf a]
end EApprox
end Measurable
section Measure
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- Integral of a simple function whose codomain is `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
def lintegral {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∑ x ∈ f.range, x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x})
theorem lintegral_eq_of_subset (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Finset ℝ≥0∞}
(hs : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {f x}) ≠ 0 → f x ∈ s) :
f.lintegral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) := by
refine Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero (fun r _ _ => r) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [forall_mem_range, mul_ne_zero_iff, and_imp]
· intros
assumption
· intro b _ hb
refine ⟨b, ?_, hb, rfl⟩
rw [mem_range, ← preimage_singleton_nonempty]
exact nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero_iff.1 hb).2
· intros
rfl
theorem lintegral_eq_of_subset' (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Finset ℝ≥0∞} (hs : f.range \ {0} ⊆ s) :
f.lintegral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
f.lintegral_eq_of_subset fun x hfx _ =>
hs <| Finset.mem_sdiff.2 ⟨f.mem_range_self x, mt Finset.mem_singleton.1 hfx⟩
/-- Calculate the integral of `(g ∘ f)`, where `g : β → ℝ≥0∞` and `f : α →ₛ β`. -/
theorem map_lintegral (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) (f : α →ₛ β) :
(f.map g).lintegral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, g x * μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) := by
simp only [lintegral, range_map]
refine Finset.sum_image' _ fun b hb => ?_
rcases mem_range.1 hb with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [map_preimage_singleton, ← f.sum_measure_preimage_singleton, Finset.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ ?_
· congr
· intro x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter]
rintro ⟨_, h⟩
rw [h]
theorem add_lintegral (f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : (f + g).lintegral μ = f.lintegral μ + g.lintegral μ :=
calc
(f + g).lintegral μ =
∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, (x.1 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x}) + x.2 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x})) := by
rw [add_eq_map₂, map_lintegral]; exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun a _ => add_mul _ _ _
_ = (∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, x.1 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x})) +
∑ x ∈ (pair f g).range, x.2 * μ (pair f g ⁻¹' {x}) := by
rw [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
_ = ((pair f g).map Prod.fst).lintegral μ + ((pair f g).map Prod.snd).lintegral μ := by
rw [map_lintegral, map_lintegral]
_ = lintegral f μ + lintegral g μ := rfl
theorem const_mul_lintegral (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (x : ℝ≥0∞) :
(const α x * f).lintegral μ = x * f.lintegral μ :=
calc
(f.map fun a => x * a).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, x * r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r}) := map_lintegral _ _
_ = x * ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r}) := by simp_rw [Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
/-- Integral of a simple function `α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞` as a bilinear map. -/
def lintegralₗ {m : MeasurableSpace α} : (α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := lintegral f
map_add' := by simp [lintegral, mul_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
map_smul' := fun c μ => by
simp [lintegral, mul_left_comm _ c, Finset.mul_sum, Measure.smul_apply c] }
map_add' f g := LinearMap.ext fun _ => add_lintegral f g
map_smul' c f := LinearMap.ext fun _ => const_mul_lintegral f c
@[simp]
theorem zero_lintegral : (0 : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞).lintegral μ = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext_iff.1 lintegralₗ.map_zero μ
theorem lintegral_add {ν} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral (μ + ν) = f.lintegral μ + f.lintegral ν :=
(lintegralₗ f).map_add μ ν
theorem lintegral_smul {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (c : R) : f.lintegral (c • μ) = c • f.lintegral μ := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (lintegralₗ f).map_smul (c • 1) μ
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral 0 = 0 :=
(lintegralₗ f).map_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum {ι} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Finset ι) :
f.lintegral (∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f.lintegral (μ i) :=
map_sum (lintegralₗ f) ..
theorem lintegral_sum {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
f.lintegral (Measure.sum μ) = ∑' i, f.lintegral (μ i) := by
simp only [lintegral, Measure.sum_apply, f.measurableSet_preimage, ← Finset.tsum_subtype, ←
ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
apply ENNReal.tsum_comm
open scoped Classical in
theorem restrict_lintegral (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(restrict f s).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r} ∩ s) :=
calc
(restrict f s).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (restrict f s ⁻¹' {r}) :=
lintegral_eq_of_subset _ fun x hx =>
if hxs : x ∈ s then fun _ => by
simp only [f.restrict_apply hs, indicator_of_mem hxs, mem_range_self]
else False.elim <| hx <| by simp [*]
_ = ∑ r ∈ f.range, r * μ (f ⁻¹' {r} ∩ s) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl <|
forall_mem_range.2 fun b =>
if hb : f b = 0 then by simp only [hb, zero_mul]
else by rw [restrict_preimage_singleton _ hs hb, inter_comm]
theorem lintegral_restrict {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
f.lintegral (μ.restrict s) = ∑ y ∈ f.range, y * μ (f ⁻¹' {y} ∩ s) := by
simp only [lintegral, Measure.restrict_apply, f.measurableSet_preimage]
theorem restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (restrict f s).lintegral μ = f.lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [f.restrict_lintegral hs, lintegral_restrict]
theorem lintegral_restrict_iUnion_of_directed {ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
(f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) (μ : Measure α) :
f.lintegral (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, f.lintegral (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
simp only [lintegral, Measure.restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup hd (measurableSet_preimage ..),
ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine finsetSum_iSup fun i j ↦ (hd i j).imp fun k ⟨hik, hjk⟩ ↦ fun a ↦ ?_
-- TODO https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/14739 make `gcongr` close this goal
constructor <;> · gcongr; refine Measure.restrict_mono ?_ le_rfl _; assumption
theorem const_lintegral (c : ℝ≥0∞) : (const α c).lintegral μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [lintegral]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· simp [μ.eq_zero_of_isEmpty]
· simp only [range_const, coe_const, Finset.sum_singleton]
unfold Function.const; rw [preimage_const_of_mem (mem_singleton c)]
theorem const_lintegral_restrict (c : ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
(const α c).lintegral (μ.restrict s) = c * μ s := by
rw [const_lintegral, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
theorem restrict_const_lintegral (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
((const α c).restrict s).lintegral μ = c * μ s := by
rw [restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, const_lintegral_restrict]
@[gcongr]
theorem lintegral_mono_fun {f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (h : f ≤ g) : f.lintegral μ ≤ g.lintegral μ := by
refine Monotone.of_left_le_map_sup (f := (lintegral · μ)) (fun f g ↦ ?_) h
calc
f.lintegral μ = ((pair f g).map Prod.fst).lintegral μ := by rw [map_fst_pair]
_ ≤ ((pair f g).map fun p ↦ p.1 ⊔ p.2).lintegral μ := by
simp only [map_lintegral]
gcongr
exact le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_lintegral (f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) : f.lintegral μ ⊔ g.lintegral μ ≤ (f ⊔ g).lintegral μ :=
Monotone.le_map_sup (fun _ _ ↦ lintegral_mono_fun) f g
@[gcongr]
theorem lintegral_mono_measure {f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ ≤ ν) : f.lintegral μ ≤ f.lintegral ν := by
simp only [lintegral]
gcongr
apply h
/-- `SimpleFunc.lintegral` is monotone both in function and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem lintegral_mono {f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ g) (hμν : μ ≤ ν) :
f.lintegral μ ≤ g.lintegral ν :=
(lintegral_mono_fun hfg).trans (lintegral_mono_measure hμν)
/-- `SimpleFunc.lintegral` depends only on the measures of `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem lintegral_eq_of_measure_preimage [MeasurableSpace β] {f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} {g : β →ₛ ℝ≥0∞}
{ν : Measure β} (H : ∀ y, μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) = ν (g ⁻¹' {y})) : f.lintegral μ = g.lintegral ν := by
simp only [lintegral, ← H]
apply lintegral_eq_of_subset
simp only [H]
intros
exact mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero ‹_›
/-- If two simple functions are equal a.e., then their `lintegral`s are equal. -/
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f.lintegral μ = g.lintegral μ :=
lintegral_eq_of_measure_preimage fun y =>
measure_congr <| Eventually.set_eq <| h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx]
theorem lintegral_map' {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {μ' : Measure β} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (g : β →ₛ ℝ≥0∞)
(m' : α → β) (eq : ∀ a, f a = g (m' a)) (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ' s = μ (m' ⁻¹' s)) :
f.lintegral μ = g.lintegral μ' :=
lintegral_eq_of_measure_preimage fun y => by
simp only [preimage, eq]
exact (h (g ⁻¹' {y}) (g.measurableSet_preimage _)).symm
theorem lintegral_map {β} [MeasurableSpace β] (g : β →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
g.lintegral (Measure.map f μ) = (g.comp f hf).lintegral μ :=
Eq.symm <| lintegral_map' _ _ f (fun _ => rfl) fun _s hs => Measure.map_apply hf hs
end Measure
section FinMeasSupp
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical in
theorem support_eq [MeasurableSpace α] [Zero β] (f : α →ₛ β) :
support f = ⋃ y ∈ {y ∈ f.range | y ≠ 0}, f ⁻¹' {y} :=
Set.ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_support, Set.mem_preimage, mem_filter, mem_range_self, true_and, exists_prop,
mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_right']
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} [Zero β] [Zero γ] {μ : Measure α} {f : α →ₛ β}
theorem measurableSet_support [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α →ₛ β) : MeasurableSet (support f) := by
rw [f.support_eq]
exact Finset.measurableSet_biUnion _ fun y _ => measurableSet_fiber _ _
lemma measure_support_lt_top (f : α →ₛ β) (hf : ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞) :
μ (support f) < ∞ := by
classical
rw [support_eq]
refine (measure_biUnion_finset_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.sum_lt_top.mpr fun y hy => ?_)
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hf y hy.2
/-- A `SimpleFunc` has finite measure support if it is equal to `0` outside of a set of finite
measure. -/
protected def FinMeasSupp {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ β) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
f =ᶠ[μ.cofinite] 0
theorem finMeasSupp_iff_support : f.FinMeasSupp μ ↔ μ (support f) < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem finMeasSupp_iff : f.FinMeasSupp μ ↔ ∀ y, y ≠ 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞ := by
classical
constructor
· refine fun h y hy => lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono ?_) h
exact fun x hx (H : f x = 0) => hy <| H ▸ Eq.symm hx
· intro H
rw [finMeasSupp_iff_support, support_eq]
exact measure_biUnion_lt_top (finite_toSet _) fun y hy ↦ H y (mem_filter.1 hy).2
namespace FinMeasSupp
theorem meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero (h : f.FinMeasSupp μ) {y : β} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
μ (f ⁻¹' {y}) < ∞ :=
finMeasSupp_iff.1 h y hy
protected theorem map {g : β → γ} (hf : f.FinMeasSupp μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) : (f.map g).FinMeasSupp μ :=
flip lt_of_le_of_lt hf (measure_mono <| support_comp_subset hg f)
theorem of_map {g : β → γ} (h : (f.map g).FinMeasSupp μ) (hg : ∀ b, g b = 0 → b = 0) :
f.FinMeasSupp μ :=
flip lt_of_le_of_lt h <| measure_mono <| support_subset_comp @(hg) _
theorem map_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : ∀ {b}, g b = 0 ↔ b = 0) :
(f.map g).FinMeasSupp μ ↔ f.FinMeasSupp μ :=
⟨fun h => h.of_map fun _ => hg.1, fun h => h.map <| hg.2 rfl⟩
protected theorem pair {g : α →ₛ γ} (hf : f.FinMeasSupp μ) (hg : g.FinMeasSupp μ) :
(pair f g).FinMeasSupp μ :=
calc
μ (support <| pair f g) = μ (support f ∪ support g) := congr_arg μ <| support_prod_mk f g
_ ≤ μ (support f) + μ (support g) := measure_union_le _ _
_ < _ := add_lt_top.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
protected theorem map₂ [Zero δ] (hf : f.FinMeasSupp μ) {g : α →ₛ γ} (hg : g.FinMeasSupp μ)
{op : β → γ → δ} (H : op 0 0 = 0) : ((pair f g).map (Function.uncurry op)).FinMeasSupp μ :=
(hf.pair hg).map H
protected theorem add {β} [AddZeroClass β] {f g : α →ₛ β} (hf : f.FinMeasSupp μ)
(hg : g.FinMeasSupp μ) : (f + g).FinMeasSupp μ := by
rw [add_eq_map₂]
exact hf.map₂ hg (zero_add 0)
protected theorem mul {β} [MulZeroClass β] {f g : α →ₛ β} (hf : f.FinMeasSupp μ)
(hg : g.FinMeasSupp μ) : (f * g).FinMeasSupp μ := by
rw [mul_eq_map₂]
exact hf.map₂ hg (zero_mul 0)
theorem lintegral_lt_top {f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (hm : f.FinMeasSupp μ) (hf : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≠ ∞) :
f.lintegral μ < ∞ := by
refine sum_lt_top.2 fun a ha => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with (rfl | ha)
· simp only [ae_iff, Ne, Classical.not_not] at hf
simp [Set.preimage, hf]
· by_cases ha0 : a = 0
· subst a
simp
· exact mul_lt_top ha.lt_top (finMeasSupp_iff.1 hm _ ha0)
theorem of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (h : f.lintegral μ ≠ ∞) : f.FinMeasSupp μ := by
refine finMeasSupp_iff.2 fun b hb => ?_
rw [f.lintegral_eq_of_subset' (Finset.subset_insert b _)] at h
refine ENNReal.lt_top_of_mul_ne_top_right ?_ hb
exact (lt_top_of_sum_ne_top h (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).ne
theorem iff_lintegral_lt_top {f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≠ ∞) :
f.FinMeasSupp μ ↔ f.lintegral μ < ∞ :=
⟨fun h => h.lintegral_lt_top hf, fun h => of_lintegral_ne_top h.ne⟩
end FinMeasSupp
lemma measure_support_lt_top_of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞} (hf : f.lintegral μ ≠ ∞) :
μ (support f) < ∞ := by
refine measure_support_lt_top f ?_
rw [← finMeasSupp_iff]
exact FinMeasSupp.of_lintegral_ne_top hf
end FinMeasSupp
/-- To prove something for an arbitrary simple function, it suffices to show
that the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions and is closed under
addition (of functions with disjoint support).
It is possible to make the hypotheses in `h_add` a bit stronger, and such conditions can be added
once we need them (for example it is only necessary to consider the case where `g` is a multiple
of a characteristic function, and that this multiple doesn't appear in the image of `f`).
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is `induction f using SimpleFunc.induction with`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {α γ} [MeasurableSpace α] [AddZeroClass γ]
{motive : SimpleFunc α γ → Prop}
(const : ∀ (c) {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s),
motive (SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const _ c) (SimpleFunc.const _ 0)))
(add : ∀ ⦃f g : SimpleFunc α γ⦄,
Disjoint (support f) (support g) → motive f → motive g → motive (f + g))
(f : SimpleFunc α γ) : motive f := by
classical
generalize h : f.range \ {0} = s
rw [← Finset.coe_inj, Finset.coe_sdiff, Finset.coe_singleton, SimpleFunc.coe_range] at h
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing f with
| empty =>
rw [Finset.coe_empty, diff_eq_empty, range_subset_singleton] at h
convert const 0 MeasurableSet.univ
ext x
simp [h]
| insert x s hxs ih =>
have mx := f.measurableSet_preimage {x}
let g := SimpleFunc.piecewise (f ⁻¹' {x}) mx 0 f
have Pg : motive g := by
apply ih
simp only [g, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, range_piecewise]
rw [image_compl_preimage, union_diff_distrib, diff_diff_comm, h, Finset.coe_insert,
insert_diff_self_of_not_mem, diff_eq_empty.mpr, Set.empty_union]
· rw [Set.image_subset_iff]
convert Set.subset_univ _
exact preimage_const_of_mem (mem_singleton _)
· rwa [Finset.mem_coe]
convert add _ Pg (const x mx)
· ext1 y
by_cases hy : y ∈ f ⁻¹' {x}
· simpa [g, hy]
· simp [g, hy]
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro y
by_cases hy : y ∈ f ⁻¹' {x} <;> simp [g, hy]
/-- To prove something for an arbitrary simple function, it suffices to show
that the property holds for constant functions and that it is closed under piecewise combinations
of functions.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is `induction f with`. -/
@[induction_eliminator]
protected theorem induction' {α γ} [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty γ] {P : SimpleFunc α γ → Prop}
(const : ∀ (c), P (SimpleFunc.const _ c))
(pcw : ∀ ⦃f g : SimpleFunc α γ⦄ {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s), P f → P g →
P (f.piecewise s hs g))
(f : SimpleFunc α γ) : P f := by
let c : γ := Classical.ofNonempty
classical
generalize h : f.range \ {c} = s
rw [← Finset.coe_inj, Finset.coe_sdiff, Finset.coe_singleton, SimpleFunc.coe_range] at h
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing f with
| empty =>
rw [Finset.coe_empty, diff_eq_empty, range_subset_singleton] at h
convert const c
ext x
simp [h]
| insert x s hxs ih =>
have mx := f.measurableSet_preimage {x}
let g := SimpleFunc.piecewise (f ⁻¹' {x}) mx (SimpleFunc.const α c) f
have Pg : P g := by
apply ih
simp only [g, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, range_piecewise]
rw [image_compl_preimage, union_diff_distrib, diff_diff_comm, h, Finset.coe_insert,
insert_diff_self_of_not_mem, diff_eq_empty.mpr, Set.empty_union]
· rw [Set.image_subset_iff]
convert Set.subset_univ _
exact preimage_const_of_mem (mem_singleton _)
· rwa [Finset.mem_coe]
convert pcw mx.compl Pg (const x)
· ext1 y
by_cases hy : y ∈ f ⁻¹' {x}
· simpa [g, hy]
· simp [g, hy]
/-- In a topological vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a simple function is
measurable. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_simpleFunc
{E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E] [AddCancelMonoid E] [MeasurableAdd E]
{g : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (f : SimpleFunc α E) :
Measurable (g + (f : α → E)) := by
classical
induction f using SimpleFunc.induction with
| @const c s hs =>
simp only [SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, SimpleFunc.coe_const,
SimpleFunc.coe_zero]
rw [← s.piecewise_same g, ← piecewise_add]
exact Measurable.piecewise hs (hg.add_const _) (hg.add_const _)
| @add f f' hff' hf hf' =>
have : (g + ↑(f + f')) = (Function.support f).piecewise (g + (f : α → E)) (g + f') := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ Function.support f
· simpa only [SimpleFunc.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Function.mem_support, ne_eq, not_not,
Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ hx, _root_.add_right_inj, add_eq_left]
using Set.disjoint_left.1 hff' hx
· simpa only [SimpleFunc.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Function.mem_support, ne_eq, not_not,
Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ hx, _root_.add_right_inj, add_eq_right] using hx
rw [this]
exact Measurable.piecewise f.measurableSet_support hf hf'
/-- In a topological vector space, the addition of a simple function and a measurable function is
measurable. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.simpleFunc_add
{E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E] [AddCancelMonoid E] [MeasurableAdd E]
{g : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (f : SimpleFunc α E) :
Measurable ((f : α → E) + g) := by
classical
induction f using SimpleFunc.induction with
| @const c s hs =>
simp only [SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, SimpleFunc.coe_const,
SimpleFunc.coe_zero]
rw [← s.piecewise_same g, ← piecewise_add]
exact Measurable.piecewise hs (hg.const_add _) (hg.const_add _)
| @add f f' hff' hf hf' =>
have : (↑(f + f') + g) = (Function.support f).piecewise ((f : α → E) + g) (f' + g) := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ Function.support f
· simpa only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Function.mem_support, ne_eq, not_not,
Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ hx, _root_.add_left_inj, add_eq_left]
using Set.disjoint_left.1 hff' hx
· simpa only [SimpleFunc.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Function.mem_support, ne_eq, not_not,
Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ hx, _root_.add_left_inj, add_eq_right] using hx
rw [this]
exact Measurable.piecewise f.measurableSet_support hf hf'
end SimpleFunc
| end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- To prove something for an arbitrary measurable function into `ℝ≥0∞`, it suffices to show
that the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions and is closed under addition
and supremum of increasing sequences of functions.
It is possible to make the hypotheses in the induction steps a bit stronger, and such conditions
can be added once we need them (for example in `h_add` it is only necessary to consider the sum of
a simple function with a multiple of a characteristic function and that the intersection
of their images is a subset of `{0}`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Measurable.ennreal_induction {motive : (α → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop}
(indicator : ∀ (c : ℝ≥0∞) ⦃s⦄, MeasurableSet s → motive (Set.indicator s fun _ => c))
(add : ∀ ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄, Disjoint (support f) (support g) →
Measurable f → Measurable g → motive f → motive g → motive (f + g))
(iSup : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞⦄, (∀ n, Measurable (f n)) → Monotone f →
(∀ n, motive (f n)) → motive fun x => ⨆ n, f n x)
⦃f : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hf : Measurable f) : motive f := by
convert iSup (fun n => (eapprox f n).measurable) (monotone_eapprox f) _ using 2
· rw [iSup_eapprox_apply hf]
· exact fun n =>
SimpleFunc.induction (fun c s hs => indicator c hs)
(fun f g hfg hf hg => add hfg f.measurable g.measurable hf hg) (eapprox f n)
/-- To prove something for an arbitrary measurable function into `ℝ≥0∞`, it suffices to show
that the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions with finite mass according to
some sigma-finite measure and is closed under addition and supremum of increasing sequences of
functions.
It is possible to make the hypotheses in the induction steps a bit stronger, and such conditions
can be added once we need them (for example in `h_add` it is only necessary to consider the sum of
a simple function with a multiple of a characteristic function and that the intersection
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFunc.lean | 1,278 | 1,313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
· apply le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (exp_pos 1).le hx0) (exp_nonneg x)
· have h := add_one_le_exp (log x)
rwa [← exp_le_exp, exp_add, exp_log (lt_of_not_le hx0), mul_comm] at h
theorem two_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : 2 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x < 0
· exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (by simp only [Nat.ofNat_nonneg]) hx0.le)
(exp_nonneg x)
· apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (le_of_not_lt hx0)) exp_one_mul_le_exp
have := Real.add_one_le_exp 1
rwa [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℝ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `log 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma log_div_self (x : ℝ) : log (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
@[gcongr, bound]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
@[bound]
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx).le).2 hx
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
@[bound]
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
@[bound]
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx.le, not_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-16")]
alias log_nonpos_iff' := log_nonpos_iff
@[bound]
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff hx).2 h'x
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
· rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
theorem log_le_sub_one_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ x - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le]
convert add_one_le_exp (log x)
rw [exp_log hx]
lemma one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 - x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
simpa [add_comm] using log_le_sub_one_of_pos (inv_pos.2 hx)
/-- See `Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma log_le_self (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ x := by
obtain rfl | hx := hx.eq_or_lt
· simp
· exact (log_le_sub_one_of_pos hx).trans (by linarith)
/-- See `Real.one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma neg_inv_le_log (hx : 0 ≤ x) : -x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
rw [neg_le, ← log_inv]; exact log_le_self <| inv_nonneg.2 hx
/-- Bound for `|log x * x|` in the interval `(0, 1]`. -/
theorem abs_log_mul_self_lt (x : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) : |log x * x| < 1 := by
have : 0 < 1 / x := by simpa only [one_div, inv_pos] using h1
replace := log_le_sub_one_of_pos this
replace : log (1 / x) < 1 / x := by linarith
rw [log_div one_ne_zero h1.ne', log_one, zero_sub, lt_div_iff₀ h1] at this
have aux : 0 ≤ -log x * x := by
refine mul_nonneg ?_ h1.le
rw [← log_inv]
| apply log_nonneg
rw [← le_inv_comm₀ h1 zero_lt_one, inv_one]
exact h2
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 315 | 317 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Anatole Dedecker, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
/-!
# Derivative of `f x * g x`
In this file we prove formulas for `(f x * g x)'` and `(f x • g x)'`.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative, multiplication
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {f : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s : Set 𝕜}
variable {L : Filter 𝕜}
/-! ### Derivative of bilinear maps -/
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G} {u : 𝕜 → E} {v : 𝕜 → F} {u' : E} {v' : F}
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_of_bilinear
(hu : HasDerivWithinAt u u' s x) (hv : HasDerivWithinAt v v' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x ↦ B (u x) (v x)) (B (u x) v' + B u' (v x)) s x := by
simpa using (B.hasFDerivWithinAt_of_bilinear
hu.hasFDerivWithinAt hv.hasFDerivWithinAt).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem hasDerivAt_of_bilinear (hu : HasDerivAt u u' x) (hv : HasDerivAt v v' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x ↦ B (u x) (v x)) (B (u x) v' + B u' (v x)) x := by
simpa using (B.hasFDerivAt_of_bilinear hu.hasFDerivAt hv.hasFDerivAt).hasDerivAt
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_of_bilinear (hu : HasStrictDerivAt u u' x) (hv : HasStrictDerivAt v v' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x ↦ B (u x) (v x)) (B (u x) v' + B u' (v x)) x := by
simpa using
(B.hasStrictFDerivAt_of_bilinear hu.hasStrictFDerivAt hv.hasStrictFDerivAt).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem derivWithin_of_bilinear
(hu : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 u s x) (hv : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 v s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => B (u y) (v y)) s x =
B (u x) (derivWithin v s x) + B (derivWithin u s x) (v x) := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (B.hasDerivWithinAt_of_bilinear hu.hasDerivWithinAt hv.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
theorem deriv_of_bilinear (hu : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 u x) (hv : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 v x) :
deriv (fun y => B (u y) (v y)) x = B (u x) (deriv v x) + B (deriv u x) (v x) :=
(B.hasDerivAt_of_bilinear hu.hasDerivAt hv.hasDerivAt).deriv
end ContinuousLinearMap
section SMul
/-! ### Derivative of the multiplication of a scalar function and a vector function -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {c' : 𝕜'}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.smul (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) s x := by
simpa using (HasFDerivWithinAt.smul hc hf).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.smul (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.smul hf
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.smul (hc : HasStrictDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c' • f x) x := by
simpa using (hc.smul hf).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem derivWithin_smul (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => c y • f y) s x = c x • derivWithin f s x + derivWithin c s x • f x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
theorem deriv_smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (fun y => c y • f y) x = c x • deriv f x + deriv c x • f x :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.smul hf.hasDerivAt).deriv
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.smul_const (hc : HasStrictDerivAt c c' x) (f : F) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c y • f) (c' • f) x := by
have := hc.smul (hasStrictDerivAt_const x f)
rwa [smul_zero, zero_add] at this
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.smul_const (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (f : F) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f) (c' • f) s x := by
have := hc.smul (hasDerivWithinAt_const x s f)
rwa [smul_zero, zero_add] at this
theorem HasDerivAt.smul_const (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (f : F) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y • f) (c' • f) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.smul_const f
theorem derivWithin_smul_const (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
derivWithin (fun y => c y • f) s x = derivWithin c s x • f := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.smul_const f).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
theorem deriv_smul_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
deriv (fun y => c y • f) x = deriv c x • f :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.smul_const f).deriv
end SMul
section ConstSMul
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F] [ContinuousConstSMul R F]
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_smul (c : R) (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c • f y) (c • f') x := by
simpa using (hf.const_smul c).hasStrictDerivAt
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.const_smul (c : R) (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
HasDerivAtFilter (fun y => c • f y) (c • f') x L := by
simpa using (hf.const_smul c).hasDerivAtFilter
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_smul (c : R) (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c • f y) (c • f') s x :=
hf.const_smul c
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.const_smul (c : R) (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c • f y) (c • f') x :=
hf.const_smul c
theorem derivWithin_const_smul (c : R) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => c • f y) s x = c • derivWithin f s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hf.hasDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
theorem deriv_const_smul (c : R) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
deriv (fun y => c • f y) x = c • deriv f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.const_smul c).deriv
/-- A variant of `deriv_const_smul` without differentiability assumption when the scalar
multiplication is by field elements. -/
lemma deriv_const_smul' {f : 𝕜 → F} {x : 𝕜} {R : Type*} [Field R] [Module R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F]
[ContinuousConstSMul R F] (c : R) :
deriv (fun y ↦ c • f y) x = c • deriv f x := by
by_cases hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
· exact deriv_const_smul c hf
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with rfl | hc
· simp only [zero_smul, deriv_const']
· have H : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y ↦ c • f y) x := by
contrapose! hf
conv => enter [2, y]; rw [← inv_smul_smul₀ hc (f y)]
exact DifferentiableAt.const_smul hf c⁻¹
rw [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt hf, deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt H, smul_zero]
end ConstSMul
section Mul
/-! ### Derivative of the multiplication of two functions -/
variable {𝕜' 𝔸 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸]
{c d : 𝕜 → 𝔸} {c' d' : 𝔸} {u v : 𝕜 → 𝕜'}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mul (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hd : HasDerivWithinAt d d' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') s x := by
have := (HasFDerivWithinAt.mul' hc hd).hasDerivWithinAt
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, one_smul, one_smul,
add_comm] at this
theorem HasDerivAt.mul (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasDerivAt d d' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.mul hd
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.mul (hc : HasStrictDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictDerivAt d d' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x := by
have := (HasStrictFDerivAt.mul' hc hd).hasStrictDerivAt
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, one_smul, one_smul,
add_comm] at this
theorem derivWithin_mul (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => c y * d y) s x = derivWithin c s x * d x + c x * derivWithin d s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.mul hd.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_mul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
deriv (fun y => c y * d y) x = deriv c x * d x + c x * deriv d x :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.mul hd.hasDerivAt).deriv
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mul_const (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (d : 𝔸) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y * d) (c' * d) s x := by
convert hc.mul (hasDerivWithinAt_const x s d) using 1
rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
theorem HasDerivAt.mul_const (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (d : 𝔸) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y * d) (c' * d) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.mul_const d
theorem hasDerivAt_mul_const (c : 𝕜) : HasDerivAt (fun x => x * c) c x := by
simpa only [one_mul] using (hasDerivAt_id' x).mul_const c
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.mul_const (hc : HasStrictDerivAt c c' x) (d : 𝔸) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c y * d) (c' * d) x := by
convert hc.mul (hasStrictDerivAt_const x d) using 1
rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
theorem derivWithin_mul_const (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝔸) :
derivWithin (fun y => c y * d) s x = derivWithin c s x * d := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.mul_const d).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
lemma derivWithin_mul_const_field (u : 𝕜') :
derivWithin (fun y => v y * u) s x = derivWithin v s x * u := by
by_cases hv : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 v s x
· rw [derivWithin_mul_const hv u]
by_cases hu : u = 0
· simp [hu]
rw [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt hv, zero_mul,
derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
have : v = fun x ↦ (v x * u) * u⁻¹ := by ext; simp [hu]
exact fun h_diff ↦ hv <| this ▸ h_diff.mul_const _
theorem deriv_mul_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝔸) :
deriv (fun y => c y * d) x = deriv c x * d :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.mul_const d).deriv
theorem deriv_mul_const_field (v : 𝕜') : deriv (fun y => u y * v) x = deriv u x * v := by
by_cases hu : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 u x
· exact deriv_mul_const hu v
· rw [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt hu, zero_mul]
rcases eq_or_ne v 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [mul_zero, deriv_const]
· refine deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (mt (fun H => ?_) hu)
simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hd] using H.mul_const v⁻¹
@[simp]
| theorem deriv_mul_const_field' (v : 𝕜') : (deriv fun x => u x * v) = fun x => deriv u x * v :=
funext fun _ => deriv_mul_const_field v
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_mul (c : 𝔸) (hd : HasDerivWithinAt d d' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c * d y) (c * d') s x := by
convert (hasDerivWithinAt_const x s c).mul hd using 1
rw [zero_mul, zero_add]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Mul.lean | 274 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (a := y \ x) (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
theorem sdiff_lt_left : x \ y < x ↔ ¬ Disjoint y x := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, and_iff_right sdiff_le]
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_right : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) : z \ x ≤ z \ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, sdiff_le_sdiff_left⟩
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hx, ← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left h
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z \ (x \ y) ⊓ z \ (y \ x) := sdiff_sup
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z \ x ⊓ z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x := by rw [← sup_inf_right]
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y := by ac_rfl
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_left (hca : z ≤ x) : (x \ y) \ (x \ z) = z \ y :=
sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff.antisymm <|
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hca
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_right (hcb : z ≤ y) : (x \ z) \ (y \ z) = x \ y := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, sdiff_le_comm]
exact ⟨sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff,
(disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb⟩
theorem inf_sdiff : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x \ z ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z = (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊔ x) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_sdiff_self_right, inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_sup_right]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ (x ⊔ z)) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_self, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_comm y, sup_inf_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := sup_eq_left.2 (inf_le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le))
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x \ z ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊓ x \ z) ⊓ y \ z := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, bot_inf_eq])
/-- See also `sdiff_inf_right_comm`. -/
theorem inf_sdiff_assoc (x y z : α) : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [← inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff])
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊓ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
/-- See also `inf_sdiff_assoc`. -/
theorem sdiff_inf_right_comm (x y z : α) : x \ z ⊓ y = (x ⊓ y) \ z := by
rw [inf_comm x, inf_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
lemma inf_sdiff_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b \ c) = b ⊓ (a \ c) := by
simp_rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-08")] alias inf_sdiff_right_comm := sdiff_inf_right_comm
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_left (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b \ c = (a ⊓ b) \ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 inf_le_left, bot_sup_eq, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_right (a b c : α) : a \ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) \ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_sdiff_distrib_left]
theorem disjoint_sdiff_comm : Disjoint (x \ z) y ↔ Disjoint x (y \ z) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff, sdiff_inf_right_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf : x ⊔ y = x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y = (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x \ y ⊔ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ (y \ x ⊔ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_sdiff_right, sup_sdiff_right]
_ = x ⊔ y := by rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff_self_left, inf_idem]
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left (h : y < z \ x) (hxz : x ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hxz]
refine (sup_le_sup_left h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left h').trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < z \ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sdiff_sup_cancel hyz]
refine (sup_le_sup_right h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right h').trans sdiff_le
instance Prod.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
sup_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (sup_inf_sdiff _ _) (sup_inf_sdiff _ _)
inf_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (inf_inf_sdiff _ _) (inf_inf_sdiff _ _)
-- Porting note: Once `pi_instance` has been ported, this is just `by pi_instance`.
instance Pi.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sup_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => sup_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
inf_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => inf_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
/-!
### Boolean algebras
-/
/-- A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator `ᶜ` such that
`x ⊓ xᶜ = ⊥` and `x ⊔ xᶜ = ⊤`. For convenience, it must also provide a set difference operation `\`
and a Heyting implication `⇨` satisfying `x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ` and `x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ`.
This is a generalization of (classical) logic of propositions, or the powerset lattice.
Since `BoundedOrder`, `OrderBot`, and `OrderTop` are mixins that require `LE`
to be present at define-time, the `extends` mechanism does not work with them.
Instead, we extend using the underlying `Bot` and `Top` data typeclasses, and replicate the
order axioms of those classes here. A "forgetful" instance back to `BoundedOrder` is provided.
-/
class BooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends
DistribLattice α, HasCompl α, SDiff α, HImp α, Top α, Bot α where
/-- The infimum of `x` and `xᶜ` is at most `⊥` -/
inf_compl_le_bot : ∀ x : α, x ⊓ xᶜ ≤ ⊥
/-- The supremum of `x` and `xᶜ` is at least `⊤` -/
top_le_sup_compl : ∀ x : α, ⊤ ≤ x ⊔ xᶜ
/-- `⊤` is the greatest element -/
le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤
/-- `⊥` is the least element -/
bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a
/-- `x \ y` is equal to `x ⊓ yᶜ` -/
sdiff := fun x y => x ⊓ yᶜ
/-- `x ⇨ y` is equal to `y ⊔ xᶜ` -/
himp := fun x y => y ⊔ xᶜ
/-- `x \ y` is equal to `x ⊓ yᶜ` -/
sdiff_eq : ∀ x y : α, x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ := by aesop
/-- `x ⇨ y` is equal to `y ⊔ xᶜ` -/
himp_eq : ∀ x y : α, x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ := by aesop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [h : BooleanAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ h with }
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- A bounded generalized boolean algebra is a boolean algebra. -/
abbrev GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [OrderTop α] :
BooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
__ := ‹OrderTop α›
compl a := ⊤ \ a
inf_compl_le_bot _ := disjoint_sdiff_self_right.le_bot
top_le_sup_compl _ := le_sup_sdiff
sdiff_eq a b := by
change _ = a ⊓ (⊤ \ b)
rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_top_eq]
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α]
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot' : x ⊓ xᶜ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| BooleanAlgebra.inf_compl_le_bot x
@[simp]
theorem sup_compl_eq_top : x ⊔ xᶜ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| BooleanAlgebra.top_le_sup_compl x
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup_eq_top : xᶜ ⊔ x = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_compl_eq_top]
theorem isCompl_compl : IsCompl x xᶜ :=
IsCompl.of_eq inf_compl_eq_bot' sup_compl_eq_top
theorem sdiff_eq : x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ :=
BooleanAlgebra.sdiff_eq x y
theorem himp_eq : x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ :=
BooleanAlgebra.himp_eq x y
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toComplementedLattice : ComplementedLattice α :=
⟨fun x => ⟨xᶜ, isCompl_compl⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹BooleanAlgebra α›
sup_inf_sdiff a b := by rw [sdiff_eq, ← inf_sup_left, sup_compl_eq_top, inf_top_eq]
inf_inf_sdiff a b := by
rw [sdiff_eq, ← inf_inf_distrib_left, inf_compl_eq_bot', inf_bot_eq]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toBiheytingAlgebra : BiheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹BooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
hnot := compl
le_himp_iff a b c := by rw [himp_eq, isCompl_compl.le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le]
himp_bot _ := _root_.himp_eq.trans (bot_sup_eq _)
top_sdiff a := by rw [sdiff_eq, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_eq_compl : ￢x = xᶜ :=
rfl
/- NOTE: Is this theorem needed at all or can we use `top_sdiff'`. -/
theorem top_sdiff : ⊤ \ x = xᶜ :=
top_sdiff' x
theorem eq_compl_iff_isCompl : x = yᶜ ↔ IsCompl x y :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [h]
exact isCompl_compl.symm, IsCompl.eq_compl⟩
theorem compl_eq_iff_isCompl : xᶜ = y ↔ IsCompl x y :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact isCompl_compl, IsCompl.compl_eq⟩
theorem compl_eq_comm : xᶜ = y ↔ yᶜ = x := by
rw [eq_comm, compl_eq_iff_isCompl, eq_compl_iff_isCompl]
theorem eq_compl_comm : x = yᶜ ↔ y = xᶜ := by
rw [eq_comm, compl_eq_iff_isCompl, eq_compl_iff_isCompl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl (x : α) : xᶜᶜ = x :=
(@isCompl_compl _ x _).symm.compl_eq
theorem compl_comp_compl : compl ∘ compl = @id α :=
funext compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_involutive : Function.Involutive (compl : α → α) :=
compl_compl
theorem compl_bijective : Function.Bijective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.bijective
theorem compl_surjective : Function.Surjective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.surjective
theorem compl_injective : Function.Injective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.injective
@[simp]
theorem compl_inj_iff : xᶜ = yᶜ ↔ x = y :=
compl_injective.eq_iff
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : zᶜ = y ↔ z = x :=
h.compl_eq ▸ compl_inj_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_top : xᶜ = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊥ :=
isCompl_bot_top.compl_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_bot : xᶜ = ⊥ ↔ x = ⊤ :=
isCompl_top_bot.compl_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf : (x ⊓ y)ᶜ = xᶜ ⊔ yᶜ :=
hnot_inf_distrib _ _
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl_iff_le : yᶜ ≤ xᶜ ↔ x ≤ y :=
⟨fun h => by have h := compl_le_compl h; simpa using h, compl_le_compl⟩
@[simp] lemma compl_lt_compl_iff_lt : yᶜ < xᶜ ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' compl_le_compl_iff_le compl_le_compl_iff_le
theorem compl_le_of_compl_le (h : yᶜ ≤ x) : xᶜ ≤ y := by
simpa only [compl_compl] using compl_le_compl h
theorem compl_le_iff_compl_le : xᶜ ≤ y ↔ yᶜ ≤ x :=
⟨compl_le_of_compl_le, compl_le_of_compl_le⟩
@[simp] theorem compl_le_self : xᶜ ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ := by simpa using le_compl_self (a := xᶜ)
@[simp] theorem compl_lt_self [Nontrivial α] : xᶜ < x ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simpa using lt_compl_self (a := xᶜ)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_compl : x \ yᶜ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sdiff_eq, compl_compl]
instance OrderDual.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
__ := instDistribLattice α
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
sdiff_eq _ _ := @himp_eq α _ _ _
himp_eq _ _ := @sdiff_eq α _ _ _
inf_compl_le_bot a := (@codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ (ofDual a)).top_le
top_le_sup_compl a := (@disjoint_compl_right _ _ (ofDual a)).le_bot
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_inf_compl : x ⊓ y ⊔ x ⊓ yᶜ = x := by rw [← sdiff_eq, sup_inf_sdiff _ _]
theorem compl_sdiff : (x \ y)ᶜ = x ⇨ y := by
rw [sdiff_eq, himp_eq, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_himp : (x ⇨ y)ᶜ = x \ y :=
@compl_sdiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem compl_sdiff_compl : xᶜ \ yᶜ = y \ x := by rw [sdiff_compl, sdiff_eq, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_himp_compl : xᶜ ⇨ yᶜ = y ⇨ x :=
@compl_sdiff_compl αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff : Disjoint xᶜ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl]
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff : Disjoint x yᶜ ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl]
theorem codisjoint_himp_self_left : Codisjoint (x ⇨ y) x :=
@disjoint_sdiff_self_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_himp_self_right : Codisjoint x (x ⇨ y) :=
@disjoint_sdiff_self_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem himp_le : x ⇨ y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ z ∧ Codisjoint x z :=
(@le_sdiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _).trans <| and_congr_right' <| @codisjoint_comm _ (_) _ _ _
@[simp] lemma himp_le_left : x ⇨ y ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ codisjoint_self.1 <| codisjoint_himp_self_right.mono_right h, fun h ↦ le_top.trans h.ge⟩
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_left : x ⇨ y = x ↔ x = ⊤ ∧ y = ⊤ := by
rw [codisjoint_himp_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma himp_ne_right : x ⇨ y ≠ x ↔ x ≠ ⊤ ∨ y ≠ ⊤ := himp_eq_left.not.trans not_and_or
lemma codisjoint_iff_compl_le_left : Codisjoint x y ↔ yᶜ ≤ x :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left.symm
lemma codisjoint_iff_compl_le_right : Codisjoint x y ↔ xᶜ ≤ y :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.symm
end BooleanAlgebra
instance Prop.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra Prop where
__ := Prop.instHeytingAlgebra
__ := GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
compl := Not
himp_eq _ _ := propext imp_iff_or_not
inf_compl_le_bot _ H := H.2 H.1
top_le_sup_compl p _ := Classical.em p
instance Prod.instBooleanAlgebra [BooleanAlgebra α] [BooleanAlgebra β] :
BooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
__ := instDistribLattice α β
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
himp_eq x y := by ext <;> simp [himp_eq]
sdiff_eq x y := by ext <;> simp [sdiff_eq]
inf_compl_le_bot x := by constructor <;> simp
top_le_sup_compl x := by constructor <;> simp
instance Pi.instBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type u} {α : ι → Type v} [∀ i, BooleanAlgebra (α i)] :
BooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
__ := instDistribLattice
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
sdiff_eq _ _ := funext fun _ => sdiff_eq
himp_eq _ _ := funext fun _ => himp_eq
inf_compl_le_bot _ _ := BooleanAlgebra.inf_compl_le_bot _
top_le_sup_compl _ _ := BooleanAlgebra.top_le_sup_compl _
instance Bool.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra Bool where
| __ := instBoundedOrder
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 738 | 738 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Junyan Xu, Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu, Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.DomAct.Basic
/-!
# Subgroup of `Equiv.Perm α` preserving a function
Let `α` and `ι` by types and let `f : α → ι`
* `DomMulAct.mem_stabilizer_iff` proves that the stabilizer of `f : α → ι`
in `(Equiv.Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ` is the set of `g : (Equiv.Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ` such that `f ∘ (mk.symm g) = f`.
The natural equivalence from `stabilizer (Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ f` to `{ g : Perm α // p ∘ g = f }`
can be obtained as `subtypeEquiv mk.symm (fun _ => mem_stabilizer_iff)`
* `DomMulAct.stabilizerMulEquiv` is the `MulEquiv` from
the MulOpposite of this stabilizer to the product,
for `i : ι`, of `Equiv.Perm {a // f a = i}`.
* Under `Fintype α` and `Fintype ι`, `DomMulAct.stabilizer_card p` computes
the cardinality of the type of permutations preserving `p` :
`Fintype.card {g : Perm α // f ∘ g = f} = ∏ i, (Fintype.card {a // f a = i})!`.
* Without `Fintype ι`, `DomMulAct.stabilizer_card' p` gives an equivalent
formula, where the product is restricted to `Finset.univ.image f`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Equiv MulAction
variable {α ι : Type*} {f : α → ι}
namespace DomMulAct
lemma mem_stabilizer_iff {g : (Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ} :
g ∈ stabilizer (Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ f ↔ f ∘ (mk.symm g :) = f := by
simp only [MulAction.mem_stabilizer_iff]; rfl
/-- The `invFun` component of `MulEquiv` from `MulAction.stabilizer (Perm α) f`
to the product of the `Equiv.Perm {a // f a = i} -/
def stabilizerEquiv_invFun (g : ∀ i, Perm {a // f a = i}) (a : α) : α := g (f a) ⟨a, rfl⟩
lemma stabilizerEquiv_invFun_eq (g : ∀ i, Perm {a // f a = i}) {a : α} {i : ι} (h : f a = i) :
stabilizerEquiv_invFun g a = g i ⟨a, h⟩ := by subst h; rfl
lemma comp_stabilizerEquiv_invFun (g : ∀ i, Perm {a // f a = i}) (a : α) :
f (stabilizerEquiv_invFun g a) = f a :=
(g (f a) ⟨a, rfl⟩).prop
/-- The `invFun` component of `MulEquiv` from `MulAction.stabilizer (Perm α) p`
to the product of the `Equiv.Perm {a | f a = i} (as an `Equiv.Perm α`) -/
def stabilizerEquiv_invFun_aux (g : ∀ i, Perm {a // f a = i}) : Perm α where
toFun := stabilizerEquiv_invFun g
invFun := stabilizerEquiv_invFun (fun i ↦ (g i).symm)
left_inv a := by
rw [stabilizerEquiv_invFun_eq _ (comp_stabilizerEquiv_invFun g a)]
exact congr_arg Subtype.val ((g <| f a).left_inv _)
right_inv a := by
rw [stabilizerEquiv_invFun_eq _ (comp_stabilizerEquiv_invFun _ a)]
exact congr_arg Subtype.val ((g <| f a).right_inv _)
variable (f) in
/-- The `MulEquiv` from the `MulOpposite` of `MulAction.stabilizer (Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ f`
to the product of the `Equiv.Perm {a // f a = i}` -/
def stabilizerMulEquiv : (stabilizer (Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ f)ᵐᵒᵖ ≃* (∀ i, Perm {a // f a = i}) where
toFun g i := Perm.subtypePerm (mk.symm g.unop) fun a ↦ by
rw [← Function.comp_apply (f := f), mem_stabilizer_iff.mp g.unop.prop]
invFun g := ⟨mk (stabilizerEquiv_invFun_aux g), by
ext a
rw [smul_apply, symm_apply_apply, Perm.smul_def]
apply comp_stabilizerEquiv_invFun⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv g := by ext i a; apply stabilizerEquiv_invFun_eq
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
lemma stabilizerMulEquiv_apply (g : (stabilizer (Perm α)ᵈᵐᵃ f)ᵐᵒᵖ) {a : α} {i : ι} (h : f a = i) :
((stabilizerMulEquiv f)) g i ⟨a, h⟩ = (mk.symm g.unop : Equiv.Perm α) a := rfl
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α]
open Nat
variable (f)
/-- The cardinality of the type of permutations preserving a function -/
theorem stabilizer_card [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] :
| Fintype.card {g : Perm α // f ∘ g = f} = ∏ i, (Fintype.card {a // f a = i})! := by
-- rewriting via Nat.card because Fintype instance is not found
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
Nat.card_congr (subtypeEquiv mk fun _ ↦ ?_),
Nat.card_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv,
Nat.card_congr (DomMulAct.stabilizerMulEquiv f).toEquiv, Nat.card_pi]
· exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ by rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_perm]
· rfl
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/DomMulAct.lean | 97 | 104 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Patrick Massot, Wen Yang, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
/-!
# Equivalence relations: partitions
This file comprises properties of equivalence relations viewed as partitions.
There are two implementations of partitions here:
* A collection `c : Set (Set α)` of sets is a partition of `α` if `∅ ∉ c` and each element `a : α`
belongs to a unique set `b ∈ c`. This is expressed as `IsPartition c`
* An indexed partition is a map `s : ι → α` whose image is a partition. This is
expressed as `IndexedPartition s`.
Of course both implementations are related to `Quotient` and `Setoid`.
`Setoid.isPartition.partition` and `Finpartition.isPartition_parts` furnish
a link between `Setoid.IsPartition` and `Finpartition`.
## TODO
Could the design of `Finpartition` inform the one of `Setoid.IsPartition`? Maybe bundling it and
changing it from `Set (Set α)` to `Set α` where `[Lattice α] [OrderBot α]` would make it more
usable.
## Tags
setoid, equivalence, iseqv, relation, equivalence relation, partition, equivalence class
-/
namespace Setoid
variable {α : Type*}
/-- If x ∈ α is in 2 elements of a set of sets partitioning α, those 2 sets are equal. -/
theorem eq_of_mem_eqv_class {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x b b'}
(hc : b ∈ c) (hb : x ∈ b) (hc' : b' ∈ c) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
(H x).unique ⟨hc, hb⟩ ⟨hc', hb'⟩
/-- Makes an equivalence relation from a set of sets partitioning α. -/
def mkClasses (c : Set (Set α)) (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) : Setoid α where
r x y := ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s → y ∈ s
iseqv.refl := fun _ _ _ hx => hx
iseqv.symm := fun {x _y} h s hs hy => by
obtain ⟨t, ⟨ht, hx⟩, _⟩ := H x
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy ht (h t ht hx)]
iseqv.trans := fun {_x _ _} h1 h2 s hs hx => h2 s hs (h1 s hs hx)
/-- Makes the equivalence classes of an equivalence relation. -/
def classes (r : Setoid α) : Set (Set α) :=
{ s | ∃ y, s = { x | r x y } }
theorem mem_classes (r : Setoid α) (y) : { x | r x y } ∈ r.classes :=
⟨y, rfl⟩
theorem classes_ker_subset_fiber_set {β : Type*} (f : α → β) :
(Setoid.ker f).classes ⊆ Set.range fun y => { x | f x = y } := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨f x, rfl⟩
theorem finite_classes_ker {α β : Type*} [Finite β] (f : α → β) : (Setoid.ker f).classes.Finite :=
(Set.finite_range _).subset <| classes_ker_subset_fiber_set f
theorem card_classes_ker_le {α β : Type*} [Fintype β] (f : α → β)
[Fintype (Setoid.ker f).classes] : Fintype.card (Setoid.ker f).classes ≤ Fintype.card β := by
classical exact
le_trans (Set.card_le_card (classes_ker_subset_fiber_set f)) (Fintype.card_range_le _)
/-- Two equivalence relations are equal iff all their equivalence classes are equal. -/
theorem eq_iff_classes_eq {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} :
r₁ = r₂ ↔ ∀ x, { y | r₁ x y } = { y | r₂ x y } :=
⟨fun h _x => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext fun x => Set.ext_iff.1 <| h x⟩
theorem rel_iff_exists_classes (r : Setoid α) {x y} : r x y ↔ ∃ c ∈ r.classes, x ∈ c ∧ y ∈ c :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, r.mem_classes y, h, r.refl' y⟩, fun ⟨c, ⟨z, hz⟩, hx, hy⟩ => by
subst c
exact r.trans' hx (r.symm' hy)⟩
/-- Two equivalence relations are equal iff their equivalence classes are equal. -/
theorem classes_inj {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} : r₁ = r₂ ↔ r₁.classes = r₂.classes :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext fun a b => by simp only [rel_iff_exists_classes, exists_prop, h]⟩
/-- The empty set is not an equivalence class. -/
theorem empty_not_mem_classes {r : Setoid α} : ∅ ∉ r.classes := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
Set.not_mem_empty y <| hy.symm ▸ r.refl' y
/-- Equivalence classes partition the type. -/
theorem classes_eqv_classes {r : Setoid α} (a) : ∃! b ∈ r.classes, a ∈ b :=
ExistsUnique.intro { x | r x a } ⟨r.mem_classes a, r.refl' _⟩ <| by
rintro y ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, ha⟩
ext x
exact ⟨fun hx => r.trans' hx (r.symm' ha), fun hx => r.trans' hx ha⟩
/-- If x ∈ α is in 2 equivalence classes, the equivalence classes are equal. -/
theorem eq_of_mem_classes {r : Setoid α} {x b} (hc : b ∈ r.classes) (hb : x ∈ b) {b'}
(hc' : b' ∈ r.classes) (hb' : x ∈ b') : b = b' :=
eq_of_mem_eqv_class classes_eqv_classes hc hb hc' hb'
/-- The elements of a set of sets partitioning α are the equivalence classes of the
equivalence relation defined by the set of sets. -/
theorem eq_eqv_class_of_mem {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {s y}
(hs : s ∈ c) (hy : y ∈ s) : s = { x | mkClasses c H x y } := by
ext x
constructor
· intro hx _s' hs' hx'
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs' hx' hs hx]
· intro hx
obtain ⟨b', ⟨hc, hb'⟩, _⟩ := H x
rwa [eq_of_mem_eqv_class H hs hy hc (hx b' hc hb')]
/-- The equivalence classes of the equivalence relation defined by a set of sets
partitioning α are elements of the set of sets. -/
theorem eqv_class_mem {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {y} :
{ x | mkClasses c H x y } ∈ c :=
(H y).elim fun _ hc _ => eq_eqv_class_of_mem H hc.1 hc.2 ▸ hc.1
theorem eqv_class_mem' {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) {x} :
{ y : α | mkClasses c H x y } ∈ c := by
convert @Setoid.eqv_class_mem _ _ H x using 3
rw [Setoid.comm']
/-- Distinct elements of a set of sets partitioning α are disjoint. -/
theorem eqv_classes_disjoint {c : Set (Set α)} (H : ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b) :
c.PairwiseDisjoint id := fun _b₁ h₁ _b₂ h₂ h =>
Set.disjoint_left.2 fun x hx1 hx2 =>
(H x).elim fun _b _hc _hx => h <| eq_of_mem_eqv_class H h₁ hx1 h₂ hx2
/-- A set of disjoint sets covering α partition α (classical). -/
theorem eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union {c : Set (Set α)} (hu : Set.sUnion c = @Set.univ α)
(H : c.PairwiseDisjoint id) (a) : ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b :=
let ⟨b, hc, ha⟩ := Set.mem_sUnion.1 <| show a ∈ _ by rw [hu]; exact Set.mem_univ a
ExistsUnique.intro b ⟨hc, ha⟩ fun _ hc' => H.elim_set hc'.1 hc _ hc'.2 ha
/-- Makes an equivalence relation from a set of disjoints sets covering α. -/
def setoidOfDisjointUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hu : Set.sUnion c = @Set.univ α)
(H : c.PairwiseDisjoint id) : Setoid α :=
Setoid.mkClasses c <| eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union hu H
/-- The equivalence relation made from the equivalence classes of an equivalence
relation r equals r. -/
theorem mkClasses_classes (r : Setoid α) : mkClasses r.classes classes_eqv_classes = r :=
ext fun x _y =>
⟨fun h => r.symm' (h { z | r z x } (r.mem_classes x) <| r.refl' x), fun h _b hb hx =>
eq_of_mem_classes (r.mem_classes x) (r.refl' x) hb hx ▸ r.symm' h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_classes (r : Setoid α) : ⋃₀ r.classes = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x => Set.mem_sUnion.2 ⟨{ y | r y x }, ⟨x, rfl⟩, Setoid.refl _⟩
/-- The equivalence between the quotient by an equivalence relation and its
type of equivalence classes. -/
noncomputable def quotientEquivClasses (r : Setoid α) : Quotient r ≃ Setoid.classes r := by
let f (a : α) : Setoid.classes r := ⟨{ x | r x a }, Setoid.mem_classes r a⟩
have f_respects_relation (a b : α) (a_rel_b : r a b) : f a = f b := by
rw [Subtype.mk.injEq]
exact Setoid.eq_of_mem_classes (Setoid.mem_classes r a) (Setoid.symm a_rel_b)
(Setoid.mem_classes r b) (Setoid.refl b)
apply Equiv.ofBijective (Quot.lift f f_respects_relation)
constructor
· intro (q_a : Quotient r) (q_b : Quotient r) h_eq
induction' q_a using Quotient.ind with a
induction' q_b using Quotient.ind with b
simp only [f, Quotient.lift_mk, Subtype.ext_iff] at h_eq
apply Quotient.sound
show a ∈ { x | r x b }
rw [← h_eq]
exact Setoid.refl a
· rw [Quot.surjective_lift]
intro ⟨c, a, hc⟩
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext hc.symm⟩
@[simp]
lemma quotientEquivClasses_mk_eq (r : Setoid α) (a : α) :
(quotientEquivClasses r (Quotient.mk r a) : Set α) = { x | r x a } :=
(@Subtype.ext_iff_val _ _ _ ⟨{ x | r x a }, Setoid.mem_classes r a⟩).mp rfl
section Partition
/-- A collection `c : Set (Set α)` of sets is a partition of `α` into pairwise
disjoint sets if `∅ ∉ c` and each element `a : α` belongs to a unique set `b ∈ c`. -/
def IsPartition (c : Set (Set α)) := ∅ ∉ c ∧ ∀ a, ∃! b ∈ c, a ∈ b
/-- A partition of `α` does not contain the empty set. -/
theorem nonempty_of_mem_partition {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) {s} (h : s ∈ c) :
s.Nonempty :=
Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun hs0 => hc.1 <| hs0 ▸ h
theorem isPartition_classes (r : Setoid α) : IsPartition r.classes :=
⟨empty_not_mem_classes, classes_eqv_classes⟩
theorem IsPartition.pairwiseDisjoint {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) :
c.PairwiseDisjoint id :=
eqv_classes_disjoint hc.2
lemma _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.isPartition_of_exists_of_ne_empty {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)}
(h₁ : s.PairwiseDisjoint id) (h₂ : ∀ a : α, ∃ x ∈ s, a ∈ x) (h₃ : ∅ ∉ s) :
Setoid.IsPartition s := by
refine ⟨h₃, fun a ↦ existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique (h₂ a) ?_⟩
intro b₁ b₂ hb₁ hb₂
apply h₁.elim hb₁.1 hb₂.1
simp only [Set.not_disjoint_iff]
exact ⟨a, hb₁.2, hb₂.2⟩
theorem IsPartition.sUnion_eq_univ {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) : ⋃₀ c = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x =>
Set.mem_sUnion.2 <|
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hc.2 x
⟨t, by
simp only [existsUnique_iff_exists] at ht
tauto⟩
/-- All elements of a partition of α are the equivalence class of some y ∈ α. -/
theorem exists_of_mem_partition {c : Set (Set α)} (hc : IsPartition c) {s} (hs : s ∈ c) :
∃ y, s = { x | mkClasses c hc.2 x y } :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_partition hc hs
⟨y, eq_eqv_class_of_mem hc.2 hs hy⟩
/-- The equivalence classes of the equivalence relation defined by a partition of α equal
the original partition. -/
theorem classes_mkClasses (c : Set (Set α)) (hc : IsPartition c) :
(mkClasses c hc.2).classes = c := by
ext s
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hy⟩, _⟩ := hc.2 y
rwa [← eq_eqv_class_of_mem _ hb hy]
· exact exists_of_mem_partition hc
/-- Defining `≤` on partitions as the `≤` defined on their induced equivalence relations. -/
instance Partition.le : LE (Subtype (@IsPartition α)) :=
⟨fun x y => mkClasses x.1 x.2.2 ≤ mkClasses y.1 y.2.2⟩
/-- Defining a partial order on partitions as the partial order on their induced
equivalence relations. -/
instance Partition.partialOrder : PartialOrder (Subtype (@IsPartition α)) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt x y := x ≤ y ∧ ¬y ≤ x
le_refl _ := @le_refl (Setoid α) _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans (Setoid α) _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm x y hx hy := by
let h := @le_antisymm (Setoid α) _ _ _ hx hy
rw [Subtype.ext_iff_val, ← classes_mkClasses x.1 x.2, ← classes_mkClasses y.1 y.2, h]
variable (α) in
/-- The order-preserving bijection between equivalence relations on a type `α`, and
partitions of `α` into subsets. -/
protected def Partition.orderIso : Setoid α ≃o { C : Set (Set α) // IsPartition C } where
toFun r := ⟨r.classes, empty_not_mem_classes, classes_eqv_classes⟩
invFun C := mkClasses C.1 C.2.2
left_inv := mkClasses_classes
right_inv C := by rw [Subtype.ext_iff_val, ← classes_mkClasses C.1 C.2]
map_rel_iff' {r s} := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mkClasses_classes r, ← mkClasses_classes s]
rfl
/-- A complete lattice instance for partitions; there is more infrastructure for the
equivalent complete lattice on equivalence relations. -/
instance Partition.completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Subtype (@IsPartition α)) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice <|
@OrderIso.toGaloisInsertion _ (Subtype (@IsPartition α)) _ (PartialOrder.toPreorder) <|
Partition.orderIso α
end Partition
/-- A finite setoid partition furnishes a finpartition -/
@[simps]
def IsPartition.finpartition {c : Finset (Set α)} (hc : Setoid.IsPartition (c : Set (Set α))) :
Finpartition (Set.univ : Set α) where
parts := c
supIndep := Finset.supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint.mpr <| eqv_classes_disjoint hc.2
sup_parts := c.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion.trans hc.sUnion_eq_univ
not_bot_mem := hc.left
end Setoid
/-- A finpartition gives rise to a setoid partition -/
theorem Finpartition.isPartition_parts {α} (f : Finpartition (Set.univ : Set α)) :
Setoid.IsPartition (f.parts : Set (Set α)) :=
⟨f.not_bot_mem,
Setoid.eqv_classes_of_disjoint_union (f.parts.sup_id_set_eq_sUnion.symm.trans f.sup_parts)
f.supIndep.pairwiseDisjoint⟩
/-- Constructive information associated with a partition of a type `α` indexed by another type `ι`,
`s : ι → Set α`.
`IndexedPartition.index` sends an element to its index, while `IndexedPartition.some` sends
an index to an element of the corresponding set.
This type is primarily useful for definitional control of `s` - if this is not needed, then
`Setoid.ker index` by itself may be sufficient. -/
structure IndexedPartition {ι α : Type*} (s : ι → Set α) where
/-- two indexes are equal if they are equal in membership -/
eq_of_mem : ∀ {x i j}, x ∈ s i → x ∈ s j → i = j
/-- sends an index to an element of the corresponding set -/
some : ι → α
/-- membership invariance for `some` -/
some_mem : ∀ i, some i ∈ s i
/-- index for type `α` -/
index : α → ι
/-- membership invariance for `index` -/
mem_index : ∀ x, x ∈ s (index x)
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- The non-constructive constructor for `IndexedPartition`. -/
noncomputable def IndexedPartition.mk' {ι α : Type*} (s : ι → Set α)
(dis : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (nonempty : ∀ i, (s i).Nonempty)
(ex : ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ s i) : IndexedPartition s where
eq_of_mem {_x _i _j} hxi hxj := by_contradiction fun h => (dis h).le_bot ⟨hxi, hxj⟩
some i := (nonempty i).some
some_mem i := (nonempty i).choose_spec
index x := (ex x).choose
mem_index x := (ex x).choose_spec
namespace IndexedPartition
open Set
variable {ι α : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
/-- On a unique index set there is the obvious trivial partition -/
instance [Unique ι] [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (IndexedPartition fun _i : ι => (Set.univ : Set α)) :=
⟨{ eq_of_mem := fun {_x _i _j} _hi _hj => Subsingleton.elim _ _
some := default
some_mem := Set.mem_univ
index := default
mem_index := Set.mem_univ }⟩
attribute [simp] some_mem
variable (hs : IndexedPartition s)
include hs in
theorem exists_mem (x : α) : ∃ i, x ∈ s i :=
⟨hs.index x, hs.mem_index x⟩
include hs in
theorem iUnion : ⋃ i, s i = univ := by
ext x
simp [hs.exists_mem x]
include hs in
theorem disjoint : Pairwise (Disjoint on s) := fun {_i _j} h =>
disjoint_left.mpr fun {_x} hxi hxj => h (hs.eq_of_mem hxi hxj)
theorem mem_iff_index_eq {x i} : x ∈ s i ↔ hs.index x = i :=
⟨fun hxi => (hs.eq_of_mem hxi (hs.mem_index x)).symm, fun h => h ▸ hs.mem_index _⟩
theorem eq (i) : s i = { x | hs.index x = i } :=
Set.ext fun _ => hs.mem_iff_index_eq
/-- The equivalence relation associated to an indexed partition. Two
elements are equivalent if they belong to the same set of the partition. -/
protected abbrev setoid (hs : IndexedPartition s) : Setoid α :=
Setoid.ker hs.index
@[simp]
theorem index_some (i : ι) : hs.index (hs.some i) = i :=
(mem_iff_index_eq _).1 <| hs.some_mem i
theorem some_index (x : α) : hs.setoid (hs.some (hs.index x)) x :=
hs.index_some (hs.index x)
/-- The quotient associated to an indexed partition. -/
protected def Quotient :=
Quotient hs.setoid
/-- The projection onto the quotient associated to an indexed partition. -/
def proj : α → hs.Quotient :=
Quotient.mk''
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited hs.Quotient :=
⟨hs.proj default⟩
theorem proj_eq_iff {x y : α} : hs.proj x = hs.proj y ↔ hs.index x = hs.index y :=
Quotient.eq''
@[simp]
theorem proj_some_index (x : α) : hs.proj (hs.some (hs.index x)) = hs.proj x :=
Quotient.eq''.2 (hs.some_index x)
/-- The obvious equivalence between the quotient associated to an indexed partition and
the indexing type. -/
def equivQuotient : ι ≃ hs.Quotient :=
(Setoid.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse hs.index hs.some <| hs.index_some).symm
@[simp]
theorem equivQuotient_index_apply (x : α) : hs.equivQuotient (hs.index x) = hs.proj x :=
hs.proj_eq_iff.mpr (some_index hs x)
@[simp]
theorem equivQuotient_symm_proj_apply (x : α) : hs.equivQuotient.symm (hs.proj x) = hs.index x :=
rfl
theorem equivQuotient_index : hs.equivQuotient ∘ hs.index = hs.proj :=
funext hs.equivQuotient_index_apply
/-- A map choosing a representative for each element of the quotient associated to an indexed
partition. This is a computable version of `Quotient.out` using `IndexedPartition.some`. -/
def out : hs.Quotient ↪ α :=
hs.equivQuotient.symm.toEmbedding.trans ⟨hs.some, Function.LeftInverse.injective hs.index_some⟩
/-- This lemma is analogous to `Quotient.mk_out'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem out_proj (x : α) : hs.out (hs.proj x) = hs.some (hs.index x) :=
rfl
/-- The indices of `Quotient.out` and `IndexedPartition.out` are equal. -/
theorem index_out (x : hs.Quotient) : hs.index x.out = hs.index (hs.out x) :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x fun x => (Setoid.ker_apply_mk_out x).trans (hs.index_some _).symm
/-- This lemma is analogous to `Quotient.out_eq'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem proj_out (x : hs.Quotient) : hs.proj (hs.out x) = x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x fun x => Quotient.sound' <| hs.some_index x
theorem class_of {x : α} : setOf (hs.setoid x) = s (hs.index x) :=
Set.ext fun _y => eq_comm.trans hs.mem_iff_index_eq.symm
theorem proj_fiber (x : hs.Quotient) : hs.proj ⁻¹' {x} = s (hs.equivQuotient.symm x) :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x fun x => by
ext y
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff, hs.mem_iff_index_eq]
exact Quotient.eq''
/-- Combine functions with disjoint domains into a new function.
You can use the regular expression `def.*piecewise` to search for
other ways to define piecewise functions in mathlib4. -/
def piecewise {β : Type*} (f : ι → α → β) : α → β := fun x => f (hs.index x) x
lemma piecewise_apply {β : Type*} {f : ι → α → β} (x : α) : hs.piecewise f x = f (hs.index x) x :=
rfl
open Function
/-- A family of injective functions with pairwise disjoint
domains and pairwise disjoint ranges can be glued together
to form an injective function. -/
theorem piecewise_inj {β : Type*} {f : ι → α → β}
(h_injOn : ∀ i, InjOn (f i) (s i))
(h_disjoint : PairwiseDisjoint (univ : Set ι) fun i => (f i) '' (s i)) :
Injective (piecewise hs f) := by
intro x y h
suffices hs.index x = hs.index y by
apply h_injOn (hs.index x) (hs.mem_index x) (this ▸ hs.mem_index y)
simpa only [piecewise_apply, this] using h
apply h_disjoint.elim trivial trivial
contrapose! h
exact h.ne_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem _ (hs.mem_index x)) (mem_image_of_mem _ (hs.mem_index y))
/-- A family of bijective functions with pairwise disjoint
domains and pairwise disjoint ranges can be glued together
to form a bijective function. -/
theorem piecewise_bij {β : Type*} {f : ι → α → β}
{t : ι → Set β} (ht : IndexedPartition t)
(hf : ∀ i, BijOn (f i) (s i) (t i)) :
Bijective (piecewise hs f) := by
set g := piecewise hs f with hg
have hg_bij : ∀ i, BijOn g (s i) (t i) := by
intro i
refine BijOn.congr (hf i) ?_
intro x hx
rw [hg, piecewise_apply, hs.mem_iff_index_eq.mp hx]
have hg_inj : InjOn g (⋃ i, s i) := by
refine injOn_of_injective ?_
refine piecewise_inj hs (fun i ↦ BijOn.injOn (hf i)) ?h_disjoint
simp only [fun i ↦ BijOn.image_eq (hf i)]
rintro i - j - hij
exact ht.disjoint hij
rw [bijective_iff_bijOn_univ, ← hs.iUnion, ← ht.iUnion]
exact bijOn_iUnion hg_bij hg_inj
end IndexedPartition
| Mathlib/Data/Setoid/Partition.lean | 518 | 535 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/Adjunctions.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
open scoped List
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
rcases h with - | ⟨L₁, L₂⟩
simp [List.nil_eq_append_iff] at h'
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩ <;> simp_all
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp +contextual [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; simpa using ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
@[to_additive
"**Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma."]
theorem church_rosser : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₃ → Join Red L₂ L₃ :=
Relation.church_rosser fun _ b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, hcd.to_red⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons {p} : Red L₁ L₂ → Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) :=
ReflTransGen.lift (List.cons p) fun _ _ => Step.cons
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons_iff (p) : Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq₁ : (p :: L₁ : List _) = LL₁
generalize eq₂ : (p :: L₂ : List _) = LL₂
intro h
induction h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on generalizing L₁ L₂ with
| refl =>
subst_vars
cases eq₂
constructor
| head h₁₂ h ih =>
subst_vars
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := p
rw [Step.cons_left_iff] at h₁₂
rcases h₁₂ with (⟨L, h₁₂, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact (ih rfl rfl).head h₁₂
· exact (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not_rev)
cons_cons
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append_left_iff : ∀ L, Red (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| p :: L => by simp [append_append_left_iff L, cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append (h₁ : Red L₁ L₃) (h₂ : Red L₂ L₄) : Red (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₃ ++ L₄) :=
(h₁.lift (fun L => L ++ L₂) fun _ _ => Step.append_right).trans ((append_append_left_iff _).2 h₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem to_append_iff : Red L (L₁ ++ L₂) ↔ ∃ L₃ L₄, L = L₃ ++ L₄ ∧ Red L₃ L₁ ∧ Red L₄ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq : L₁ ++ L₂ = L₁₂
intro h
induction h generalizing L₁ L₂ with
| refl => exact ⟨_, _, eq.symm, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| tail hLL' h ih =>
obtain @⟨s, e, a, b⟩ := h
rcases List.append_eq_append_iff.1 eq with (⟨s', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨e', rfl, rfl⟩)
· have : L₁ ++ (s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e) = L₁ ++ s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂.tail Step.not⟩
· have : s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e' ++ L₂ = s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: (e' ++ L₂) :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁.tail Step.not, h₂⟩)
fun ⟨_, _, Eq, h₃, h₄⟩ => Eq.symm ▸ append_append h₃ h₄
/-- The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself."]
theorem nil_iff : Red [] L ↔ L = [] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => Red.not_step_nil
/-- A letter only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "A letter only reduces to itself."]
theorem singleton_iff {x} : Red [x] L₁ ↔ L₁ = [x] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => not_step_singleton
/-- If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `xw` reduces to the empty word, then `w` reduces
to `x⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive
"If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `x + w` reduces to the empty word, then `w`
reduces to `-x`."]
theorem cons_nil_iff_singleton {x b} : Red ((x, b) :: L) [] ↔ Red L [(x, not b)] :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
have h₁ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) [(x, not b)] := cons_cons h
have h₂ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) L := ReflTransGen.single Step.cons_not_rev
let ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩ := church_rosser h₁ h₂
rw [singleton_iff] at h₁
subst L'
assumption)
| fun h => (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 275 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 553 | 555 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Casts of rational numbers into linear ordered fields.
-/
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem castHom_rat : castHom ℚ = RingHom.id ℚ :=
RingHom.ext cast_id
section LinearOrderedField
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
theorem cast_pos_of_pos (hq : 0 < q) : (0 : K) < q := by
rw [Rat.cast_def]
exact div_pos (Int.cast_pos.2 <| num_pos.2 hq) (Nat.cast_pos.2 q.pos)
@[mono]
theorem cast_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℚ → K) := fun p q => by
simpa only [sub_pos, cast_sub] using cast_pos_of_pos (K := K) (q := q - p)
@[mono]
theorem cast_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ → K) :=
cast_strictMono.monotone
/-- Coercion from `ℚ` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps!]
def castOrderEmbedding : ℚ ↪o K :=
OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono (↑) cast_strictMono
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (p : K) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q := castOrderEmbedding.le_iff_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (p : K) < q ↔ p < q := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_le_ratCast⟩ := cast_le
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_lt_ratCast⟩ := cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : 0 ≤ (q : K) ↔ 0 ≤ q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (q : K) ≤ 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : K) < q ↔ 0 < q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (q : K) < 0 ↔ q < 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le_natCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℕ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Order.lean | 62 | 62 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Maximal length of chains
This file contains lemmas to work with the maximal length of strictly descending finite
sequences (chains) in a partial order.
## Main definition
- `Set.subchain`: The set of strictly ascending lists of `α` contained in a `Set α`.
- `Set.chainHeight`: The maximal length of a strictly ascending sequence in a partial order.
This is defined as the maximum of the lengths of `Set.subchain`s, valued in `ℕ∞`.
## Main results
- `Set.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight`: For each `n : ℕ` such that `n ≤ s.chainHeight`, there
exists `s.subchain` of length `n`.
- `Set.chainHeight_mono`: If `s ⊆ t` then `s.chainHeight ≤ t.chainHeight`.
- `Set.chainHeight_image`: If `f` is an order embedding, then
`(f '' s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight`.
- `Set.chainHeight_insert_of_forall_lt`: If `∀ y ∈ s, y < x`, then
`(insert x s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + 1`.
- `Set.chainHeight_insert_of_forall_gt`: If `∀ y ∈ s, x < y`, then
`(insert x s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + 1`.
- `Set.chainHeight_union_eq`: If `∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, s ≤ t`, then
`(s ∪ t).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + t.chainHeight`.
- `Set.wellFoundedGT_of_chainHeight_ne_top`:
If `s` has finite height, then `>` is well-founded on `s`.
- `Set.wellFoundedLT_of_chainHeight_ne_top`:
If `s` has finite height, then `<` is well-founded on `s`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List hiding le_antisymm
open OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section LT
variable [LT α] [LT β] (s t : Set α)
/-- The set of strictly ascending lists of `α` contained in a `Set α`. -/
def subchain : Set (List α) :=
{ l | l.Chain' (· < ·) ∧ ∀ i ∈ l, i ∈ s }
@[simp]
theorem nil_mem_subchain : [] ∈ s.subchain := ⟨trivial, fun _ ↦ nofun⟩
variable {s} {l : List α} {a : α}
theorem cons_mem_subchain_iff :
(a::l) ∈ s.subchain ↔ a ∈ s ∧ l ∈ s.subchain ∧ ∀ b ∈ l.head?, a < b := by
simp only [subchain, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_cons, chain'_cons', and_left_comm, and_comm,
and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_mem_subchain_iff : [a] ∈ s.subchain ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [cons_mem_subchain_iff]
instance : Nonempty s.subchain :=
⟨⟨[], s.nil_mem_subchain⟩⟩
variable (s)
/-- The maximal length of a strictly ascending sequence in a partial order. -/
noncomputable def chainHeight : ℕ∞ :=
⨆ l ∈ s.subchain, length l
theorem chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype : s.chainHeight = ⨆ l : s.subchain, ↑l.1.length :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight {n : ℕ} (hn : ↑n ≤ s.chainHeight) :
∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n := by
rcases (le_top : s.chainHeight ≤ ⊤).eq_or_lt with ha | ha <;>
rw [chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype] at ha
· obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩, h₃⟩ :=
not_bddAbove_iff'.mp (WithTop.iSup_coe_eq_top.1 ha) n
exact ⟨l.take n, ⟨h₁.take _, fun x h ↦ h₂ _ <| take_subset _ _ h⟩,
(l.length_take).trans <| min_eq_left <| le_of_not_ge h₃⟩
· rw [ENat.iSup_coe_lt_top] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩, e : l.length = _⟩ := Nat.sSup_mem (Set.range_nonempty _) ha
refine
⟨l.take n, ⟨h₁.take _, fun x h ↦ h₂ _ <| take_subset _ _ h⟩,
(l.length_take).trans <| min_eq_left <| ?_⟩
rwa [e, ← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), sSup_range, ENat.coe_iSup ha, ← chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype]
theorem le_chainHeight_TFAE (n : ℕ) :
TFAE [↑n ≤ s.chainHeight, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, n ≤ length l] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := s.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun ⟨l, hls, he⟩ ↦ ⟨l, hls, he.ge⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := fun ⟨l, hs, hn⟩ ↦ le_iSup₂_of_le l hs (WithTop.coe_le_coe.2 hn)
tfae_finish
variable {s t}
theorem le_chainHeight_iff {n : ℕ} : ↑n ≤ s.chainHeight ↔ ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n :=
(le_chainHeight_TFAE s n).out 0 1
theorem length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain (hl : l ∈ s.subchain) : ↑l.length ≤ s.chainHeight :=
le_chainHeight_iff.mpr ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
theorem chainHeight_eq_top_iff : s.chainHeight = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n := by
refine ⟨fun h n ↦ le_chainHeight_iff.1 (le_top.trans_eq h.symm), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! h; obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := WithTop.ne_top_iff_exists.1 h
exact ⟨n + 1, fun l hs ↦ (Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 <| Nat.cast_le.1 <|
(length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain hs).trans_eq hn.symm).ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_le_chainHeight_iff : 1 ≤ s.chainHeight ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, Set.le_chainHeight_iff]
simp only [length_eq_one_iff, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), @eq_comm _ _ [_], exists_exists_eq_and,
singleton_mem_subchain_iff, Set.Nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_eq_zero_iff : s.chainHeight = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, one_le_chainHeight_iff,
nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_empty : (∅ : Set α).chainHeight = 0 :=
chainHeight_eq_zero_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] : s.chainHeight = 0 :=
chainHeight_eq_zero_iff.mpr (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
theorem le_chainHeight_add_nat_iff {n m : ℕ} :
↑n ≤ s.chainHeight + m ↔ ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, n ≤ length l + m := by
simp_rw [← tsub_le_iff_right, ← ENat.coe_sub, (le_chainHeight_TFAE s (n - m)).out 0 2]
theorem chainHeight_add_le_chainHeight_add (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (n m : ℕ) :
s.chainHeight + n ≤ t.chainHeight + m ↔
∀ l ∈ s.subchain, ∃ l' ∈ t.subchain, length l + n ≤ length l' + m := by
refine
⟨fun e l h ↦
le_chainHeight_add_nat_iff.1
((add_le_add_right (length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain h) _).trans e),
fun H ↦ ?_⟩
by_cases h : s.chainHeight = ⊤
· suffices t.chainHeight = ⊤ by
rw [this, top_add]
| exact le_top
rw [chainHeight_eq_top_iff] at h ⊢
intro k
| Mathlib/Order/Height.lean | 157 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
/-!
# Isomorphism theorems for modules.
* The Noether's first, second, and third isomorphism theorems for modules are proved as
`LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange`, `LinearMap.quotientInfEquivSupQuotient` and
`Submodule.quotientQuotientEquivQuotient`.
-/
universe u v
variable {R M M₂ M₃ : Type*}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-! The first and second isomorphism theorems for modules. -/
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
section IsomorphismLaws
/-- The **first isomorphism law for modules**. The quotient of `M` by the kernel of `f` is linearly
equivalent to the range of `f`. -/
noncomputable def quotKerEquivRange : (M ⧸ LinearMap.ker f) ≃ₗ[R] LinearMap.range f :=
(LinearEquiv.ofInjective ((LinearMap.ker f).liftQ f <| le_rfl) <|
ker_eq_bot.mp <| Submodule.ker_liftQ_eq_bot _ _ _ (le_refl (LinearMap.ker f))).trans
(LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ <| Submodule.range_liftQ _ _ _)
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem for surjective linear maps**. -/
noncomputable def quotKerEquivOfSurjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(M ⧸ LinearMap.ker f) ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
f.quotKerEquivRange.trans <| .ofTop (LinearMap.range f) <| range_eq_top.2 hf
@[simp]
theorem quotKerEquivRange_apply_mk (x : M) :
(f.quotKerEquivRange (Submodule.Quotient.mk x) : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotKerEquivRange_symm_apply_image (x : M) (h : f x ∈ LinearMap.range f) :
f.quotKerEquivRange.symm ⟨f x, h⟩ = (LinearMap.ker f).mkQ x :=
f.quotKerEquivRange.symm_apply_apply ((LinearMap.ker f).mkQ x)
/-- Linear map from `p` to `p+p'/p'` where `p p'` are submodules of `R` -/
abbrev subToSupQuotient (p p' : Submodule R M) :
{ x // x ∈ p } →ₗ[R] { x // x ∈ p ⊔ p' } ⧸ comap (Submodule.subtype (p ⊔ p')) p' :=
(comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p').mkQ.comp (Submodule.inclusion le_sup_left)
theorem comap_leq_ker_subToSupQuotient (p p' : Submodule R M) :
comap (Submodule.subtype p) (p ⊓ p') ≤ ker (subToSupQuotient p p') := by
rw [LinearMap.ker_comp, Submodule.inclusion, comap_codRestrict, ker_mkQ, map_comap_subtype]
exact comap_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ le_sup_left)
/-- Canonical linear map from the quotient `p/(p ∩ p')` to `(p+p')/p'`, mapping `x + (p ∩ p')`
to `x + p'`, where `p` and `p'` are submodules of an ambient module.
Note that in the following declaration the type of the domain is expressed using
``comap p.subtype p ⊓ comap p.subtype p'`
instead of
`comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')`
because the former is the simp normal form (see also `Submodule.comap_inf`). -/
def quotientInfToSupQuotient (p p' : Submodule R M) :
(↥p) ⧸ (comap p.subtype p ⊓ comap p.subtype p') →ₗ[R]
(↥(p ⊔ p')) ⧸ (comap (p ⊔ p').subtype p') :=
(comap p.subtype (p ⊓ p')).liftQ (subToSupQuotient p p') (comap_leq_ker_subToSupQuotient p p')
theorem quotientInfEquivSupQuotient_injective (p p' : Submodule R M) :
Function.Injective (quotientInfToSupQuotient p p') := by
rw [← ker_eq_bot, quotientInfToSupQuotient, ker_liftQ_eq_bot]
rw [ker_comp, ker_mkQ]
exact fun ⟨x, hx1⟩ hx2 => ⟨hx1, hx2⟩
theorem quotientInfEquivSupQuotient_surjective (p p' : Submodule R M) :
Function.Surjective (quotientInfToSupQuotient p p') := by
rw [← range_eq_top, quotientInfToSupQuotient, range_liftQ, eq_top_iff']
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; rcases mem_sup.1 hx with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
use ⟨y, hy⟩; apply (Submodule.Quotient.eq _).2
| simp only [mem_comap, map_sub, coe_subtype, coe_inclusion, sub_add_cancel_left, neg_mem_iff, hz]
/--
Second Isomorphism Law : the canonical map from `p/(p ∩ p')` to `(p+p')/p'` as a linear isomorphism.
Note that in the following declaration the type of the domain is expressed using
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Isomorphisms.lean | 88 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Complex
/-!
# Cyclotomic polynomials.
For `n : ℕ` and an integral domain `R`, we define a modified version of the `n`-th cyclotomic
polynomial with coefficients in `R`, denoted `cyclotomic' n R`, as `∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ` varies
over the primitive `n`th roots of unity. If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R` then
this the standard definition. We then define the standard cyclotomic polynomial `cyclotomic n R`
with coefficients in any ring `R`.
## Main definition
* `cyclotomic n R` : the `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_cyclotomic` : The degree of `cyclotomic n` is `totient n`.
* `Polynomial.prod_cyclotomic_eq_X_pow_sub_one` : `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (cyclotomic i)`, where `i`
divides `n`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_eq_prod_X_pow_sub_one_pow_moebius` : The Möbius inversion formula for
`cyclotomic n R` over an abstract fraction field for `R[X]`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `cyclotomic' n R` makes sense in any integral domain `R`, but the interesting
results hold if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. In particular, our definition is
not the standard one unless there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `R`. For example,
`cyclotomic' 3 ℤ = 1`, since there are no primitive cube roots of unity in `ℤ`. The main example is
`R = ℂ`, we decided to work in general since the difficulties are essentially the same.
To get the standard cyclotomic polynomials, we use `unique_int_coeff_of_cycl`, with `R = ℂ`,
to get a polynomial with integer coefficients and then we map it to `R[X]`, for any ring `R`.
-/
open scoped Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace Polynomial
section Cyclotomic'
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
/-- The modified `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`, it is the usual cyclotomic
polynomial if there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `R`. -/
def cyclotomic' (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : R[X] :=
∏ μ ∈ primitiveRoots n R, (X - C μ)
/-- The zeroth modified cyclotomic polyomial is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_zero (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 0 R = 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_empty, primitiveRoots_zero]
/-- The first modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_one (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' 1 R = X - 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic', Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_one,
IsPrimitiveRoot.primitiveRoots_one]
/-- The second modified cyclotomic polyomial is `X + 1` if the characteristic of `R` is not `2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic'_two (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p : ℕ) [CharP R p] (hp : p ≠ 2) :
cyclotomic' 2 R = X + 1 := by
rw [cyclotomic']
have prim_root_two : primitiveRoots 2 R = {(-1 : R)} := by
simp only [Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_primitiveRoots two_pos]
exact ⟨IsPrimitiveRoot.neg_one p hp, fun x => IsPrimitiveRoot.eq_neg_one_of_two_right⟩
simp only [prim_root_two, Finset.prod_singleton, RingHom.map_neg, RingHom.map_one, sub_neg_eq_add]
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is monic. -/
theorem cyclotomic'.monic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).Monic :=
monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun _ _ => monic_X_sub_C _
/-- `cyclotomic' n R` is different from `0`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : cyclotomic' n R ≠ 0 :=
(cyclotomic'.monic n R).ne_zero
/-- The natural degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of
unity in `R`. -/
theorem natDegree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).natDegree = Nat.totient n := by
rw [cyclotomic']
rw [natDegree_prod (primitiveRoots n R) fun z : R => X - C z]
· simp only [IsPrimitiveRoot.card_primitiveRoots h, mul_one, natDegree_X_sub_C, Nat.cast_id,
Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
intro z _
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero z
/-- The degree of `cyclotomic' n R` is `totient n` if there is a primitive root of unity in `R`. -/
theorem degree_cyclotomic' {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
(cyclotomic' n R).degree = Nat.totient n := by
simp only [degree_eq_natDegree (cyclotomic'_ne_zero n R), natDegree_cyclotomic' h]
/-- The roots of `cyclotomic' n R` are the primitive `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem roots_of_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
(cyclotomic' n R).roots = (primitiveRoots n R).val := by
rw [cyclotomic']; exact roots_prod_X_sub_C (primitiveRoots n R)
/-- If there is a primitive `n`th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1 = ∏ (X - μ)`, where `μ`
varies over the `n`-th roots of unity. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod {ζ : R} {n : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
X ^ n - 1 = ∏ ζ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R), (X - C ζ) := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset, ← Multiset.toFinset_eq (IsPrimitiveRoot.nthRoots_one_nodup h)]
simp only [Finset.prod_mk, RingHom.map_one]
rw [nthRoots]
have hmonic : (X ^ n - C (1 : R)).Monic := monic_X_pow_sub_C (1 : R) (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
symm
apply prod_multiset_X_sub_C_of_monic_of_roots_card_eq hmonic
rw [@natDegree_X_pow_sub_C R _ _ n 1, ← nthRoots]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- `cyclotomic' n K` splits. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_splits (n : ℕ) : Splits (RingHom.id K) (cyclotomic' n K) := by
apply splits_prod (RingHom.id K)
intro z _
simp only [splits_X_sub_C (RingHom.id K)]
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `X ^ n - 1` splits. -/
theorem X_pow_sub_one_splits {ζ : K} {n : ℕ} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
Splits (RingHom.id K) (X ^ n - C (1 : K)) := by
rw [splits_iff_card_roots, ← nthRoots, IsPrimitiveRoot.card_nthRoots_one h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then
`∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic' i K = X ^ n - 1`. -/
theorem prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
∏ i ∈ Nat.divisors n, cyclotomic' i K = X ^ n - 1 := by
classical
have hd : (n.divisors : Set ℕ).PairwiseDisjoint fun k => primitiveRoots k K :=
fun x _ y _ hne => IsPrimitiveRoot.disjoint hne
simp only [X_pow_sub_one_eq_prod hpos h, cyclotomic', ← Finset.prod_biUnion hd,
IsPrimitiveRoot.nthRoots_one_eq_biUnion_primitiveRoots]
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then
`cyclotomic' n K = (X ^ k - 1) /ₘ (∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors k, cyclotomic' i K)`. -/
theorem cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one_div {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(hpos : 0 < n) (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
cyclotomic' n K = (X ^ n - 1) /ₘ ∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors n, cyclotomic' i K := by
rw [← prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos h, ← Nat.cons_self_properDivisors hpos.ne',
Finset.prod_cons]
have prod_monic : (∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors n, cyclotomic' i K).Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic
intro i _
exact cyclotomic'.monic i K
rw [(div_modByMonic_unique (cyclotomic' n K) 0 prod_monic _).1]
simp only [degree_zero, zero_add]
refine ⟨by rw [mul_comm], ?_⟩
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
intro h
exact Monic.ne_zero prod_monic (degree_eq_bot.1 h)
/-- If there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`, then `cyclotomic' n K` comes from a
monic polynomial with integer coefficients. -/
theorem int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] {ζ : K} {n : ℕ}
(h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) : ∃ P : ℤ[X], map (Int.castRingHom K) P =
cyclotomic' n K ∧ P.degree = (cyclotomic' n K).degree ∧ P.Monic := by
refine lifts_and_degree_eq_and_monic ?_ (cyclotomic'.monic n K)
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with k ihk generalizing ζ
rcases k.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· use 1
simp only [cyclotomic'_zero, coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_one]
let B : K[X] := ∏ i ∈ Nat.properDivisors k, cyclotomic' i K
have Bmo : B.Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic
intro i _
exact cyclotomic'.monic i K
have Bint : B ∈ lifts (Int.castRingHom K) := by
refine Subsemiring.prod_mem (lifts (Int.castRingHom K)) ?_
intro x hx
have xsmall := (Nat.mem_properDivisors.1 hx).2
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := (Nat.mem_properDivisors.1 hx).1
rw [mul_comm] at hd
exact ihk x xsmall (h.pow hpos hd)
replace Bint := lifts_and_degree_eq_and_monic Bint Bmo
obtain ⟨B₁, hB₁, _, hB₁mo⟩ := Bint
let Q₁ : ℤ[X] := (X ^ k - 1) /ₘ B₁
have huniq : 0 + B * cyclotomic' k K = X ^ k - 1 ∧ (0 : K[X]).degree < B.degree := by
constructor
· rw [zero_add, mul_comm, ← prod_cyclotomic'_eq_X_pow_sub_one hpos h, ←
Nat.cons_self_properDivisors hpos.ne', Finset.prod_cons]
· simpa only [degree_zero, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot] using Bmo.ne_zero
replace huniq := div_modByMonic_unique (cyclotomic' k K) (0 : K[X]) Bmo huniq
simp only [lifts, RingHom.mem_rangeS]
use Q₁
rw [coe_mapRingHom, map_divByMonic (Int.castRingHom K) hB₁mo, hB₁, ← huniq.1]
simp
/-- If `K` is of characteristic `0` and there is a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `K`,
then `cyclotomic n K` comes from a unique polynomial with integer coefficients. -/
theorem unique_int_coeff_of_cycl {K : Type*} [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CharZero K] {ζ : K}
{n : ℕ+} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ n) :
∃! P : ℤ[X], map (Int.castRingHom K) P = cyclotomic' n K := by
obtain ⟨P, hP⟩ := int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' h
refine ⟨P, hP.1, fun Q hQ => ?_⟩
apply map_injective (Int.castRingHom K) Int.cast_injective
rw [hP.1, hQ]
end Field
end Cyclotomic'
section Cyclotomic
/-- The `n`-th cyclotomic polynomial with coefficients in `R`. -/
def cyclotomic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] : R[X] :=
if h : n = 0 then 1
else map (Int.castRingHom R) (int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n h)).choose
theorem int_cyclotomic_rw {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
cyclotomic n ℤ = (int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n h)).choose := by
simp only [cyclotomic, h, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
ext i
simp only [coeff_map, Int.cast_id, eq_intCast]
/-- `cyclotomic n R` comes from `cyclotomic n ℤ`. -/
theorem map_cyclotomic_int (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] :
map (Int.castRingHom R) (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic n R := by
by_cases hzero : n = 0
· simp only [hzero, cyclotomic, dif_pos, Polynomial.map_one]
simp [cyclotomic, hzero]
theorem int_cyclotomic_spec (n : ℕ) :
map (Int.castRingHom ℂ) (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic' n ℂ ∧
(cyclotomic n ℤ).degree = (cyclotomic' n ℂ).degree ∧ (cyclotomic n ℤ).Monic := by
by_cases hzero : n = 0
· simp only [hzero, cyclotomic, degree_one, monic_one, cyclotomic'_zero, dif_pos,
eq_self_iff_true, Polynomial.map_one, and_self_iff]
rw [int_cyclotomic_rw hzero]
exact (int_coeff_of_cyclotomic' (Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp n hzero)).choose_spec
theorem int_cyclotomic_unique {n : ℕ} {P : ℤ[X]} (h : map (Int.castRingHom ℂ) P = cyclotomic' n ℂ) :
P = cyclotomic n ℤ := by
apply map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℂ) Int.cast_injective
rw [h, (int_cyclotomic_spec n).1]
/-- The definition of `cyclotomic n R` commutes with any ring homomorphism. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_cyclotomic (n : ℕ) {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
map f (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic n S := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int n R, ← map_cyclotomic_int n S, map_map]
have : Subsingleton (ℤ →+* S) := inferInstance
congr!
theorem cyclotomic.eval_apply {R S : Type*} (q : R) (n : ℕ) [Ring R] [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) :
eval (f q) (cyclotomic n S) = f (eval q (cyclotomic n R)) := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic n f, eval_map, eval₂_at_apply]
@[simp] theorem cyclotomic.eval_apply_ofReal (q : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
eval (q : ℂ) (cyclotomic n ℂ) = (eval q (cyclotomic n ℝ)) :=
cyclotomic.eval_apply q n (algebraMap ℝ ℂ)
/-- The zeroth cyclotomic polyomial is `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_zero (R : Type*) [Ring R] : cyclotomic 0 R = 1 := by
simp only [cyclotomic, dif_pos]
/-- The first cyclotomic polyomial is `X - 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_one (R : Type*) [Ring R] : cyclotomic 1 R = X - 1 := by
have hspec : map (Int.castRingHom ℂ) (X - 1) = cyclotomic' 1 ℂ := by
simp only [cyclotomic'_one, PNat.one_coe, map_X, Polynomial.map_one, Polynomial.map_sub]
symm
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← int_cyclotomic_unique hspec]
simp only [map_X, Polynomial.map_one, Polynomial.map_sub]
/-- `cyclotomic n` is monic. -/
theorem cyclotomic.monic (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Ring R] : (cyclotomic n R).Monic := by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int]
| exact (int_cyclotomic_spec n).2.2.map _
/-- `cyclotomic n` is primitive. -/
theorem cyclotomic.isPrimitive (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [CommRing R] : (cyclotomic n R).IsPrimitive :=
(cyclotomic.monic n R).isPrimitive
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 291 | 295 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Lemmas about the interaction of power operations with order in terms of `CovariantClass`
-/
open Function
variable {β G M : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder M]
namespace Left
variable [MulLeftMono M] {a : M}
@[to_additive Left.nsmul_nonneg]
theorem one_le_pow_of_le (ha : 1 ≤ a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 => by simp
| k + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact one_le_mul (one_le_pow_of_le ha k) ha
@[to_additive nsmul_nonpos]
theorem pow_le_one_of_le (ha : a ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≤ 1 := one_le_pow_of_le (M := Mᵒᵈ) ha n
@[to_additive nsmul_neg]
theorem pow_lt_one_of_lt {a : M} {n : ℕ} (h : a < 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n < 1 := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [pow_succ']
exact mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le h (pow_le_one_of_le h.le _)
end Left
@[to_additive nsmul_nonneg] alias one_le_pow_of_one_le' := Left.one_le_pow_of_le
@[to_additive nsmul_nonpos] alias pow_le_one' := Left.pow_le_one_of_le
@[to_additive nsmul_neg] alias pow_lt_one' := Left.pow_lt_one_of_lt
section Left
variable [MulLeftMono M] {a : M} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive nsmul_left_monotone]
theorem pow_right_monotone (ha : 1 ≤ a) : Monotone fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n ↦ by rw [pow_succ]; exact le_mul_of_one_le_right' ha
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) nsmul_le_nsmul_left]
theorem pow_le_pow_right' {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
pow_right_monotone ha h
@[to_additive nsmul_le_nsmul_left_of_nonpos]
theorem pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' {n m : ℕ} (ha : a ≤ 1) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ m ≤ a ^ n :=
pow_le_pow_right' (M := Mᵒᵈ) ha h
@[to_additive nsmul_pos]
theorem one_lt_pow' (ha : 1 < a) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 < a ^ k :=
pow_lt_one' (M := Mᵒᵈ) ha hk
@[to_additive]
lemma le_self_pow (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ≤ a ^ n := by
simpa using pow_le_pow_right' ha (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)
end Left
section LeftLt
variable [MulLeftStrictMono M] {a : M} {n m : ℕ}
@[to_additive nsmul_left_strictMono]
theorem pow_right_strictMono' (ha : 1 < a) : StrictMono ((a ^ ·) : ℕ → M) :=
strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n ↦ by rw [pow_succ]; exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' (a ^ n) ha
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) nsmul_lt_nsmul_left]
theorem pow_lt_pow_right' (ha : 1 < a) (h : n < m) : a ^ n < a ^ m :=
pow_right_strictMono' ha h
end LeftLt
section Right
variable [MulRightMono M] {x : M}
@[to_additive Right.nsmul_nonneg]
theorem Right.one_le_pow_of_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 1 ≤ x ^ n
| 0 => (pow_zero _).ge
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact Right.one_le_mul (Right.one_le_pow_of_le hx) hx
@[to_additive Right.nsmul_nonpos]
theorem Right.pow_le_one_of_le (hx : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} : x ^ n ≤ 1 :=
Right.one_le_pow_of_le (M := Mᵒᵈ) hx
@[to_additive Right.nsmul_neg]
theorem Right.pow_lt_one_of_lt {n : ℕ} {x : M} (hn : 0 < n) (h : x < 1) : x ^ n < 1 := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne' with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt (pow_le_one_of_le h.le) h
/-- This lemma is useful in non-cancellative monoids, like sets under pointwise operations. -/
@[to_additive
"This lemma is useful in non-cancellative monoids, like sets under pointwise operations."]
lemma pow_le_pow_mul_of_sq_le_mul [MulLeftMono M] {a b : M} (hab : a ^ 2 ≤ b * a) :
∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → a ^ n ≤ b ^ (n - 1) * a
| 1, _ => by simp
| n + 2, _ => by
calc
a ^ (n + 2) = a ^ (n + 1) * a := by rw [pow_succ]
_ ≤ b ^ n * a * a := mul_le_mul_right' (pow_le_pow_mul_of_sq_le_mul hab (by omega)) _
_ = b ^ n * a ^ 2 := by rw [mul_assoc, sq]
_ ≤ b ^ n * (b * a) := mul_le_mul_left' hab _
_ = b ^ (n + 1) * a := by rw [← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
end Right
section CovariantLTSwap
variable [Preorder β] [MulLeftStrictMono M] [MulRightStrictMono M] {f : β → M} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive StrictMono.const_nsmul]
theorem StrictMono.pow_const (hf : StrictMono f) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → StrictMono (f · ^ n)
| 0, hn => (hn rfl).elim
| 1, _ => by simpa
| Nat.succ <| Nat.succ n, _ => by
simpa only [pow_succ] using (hf.pow_const n.succ_ne_zero).mul' hf
/-- See also `pow_left_strictMonoOn₀`. -/
@[to_additive nsmul_right_strictMono]
theorem pow_left_strictMono (hn : n ≠ 0) : StrictMono (· ^ n : M → M) := strictMono_id.pow_const hn
@[to_additive (attr := mono, gcongr) nsmul_lt_nsmul_right]
lemma pow_lt_pow_left' (hn : n ≠ 0) {a b : M} (hab : a < b) : a ^ n < b ^ n :=
pow_left_strictMono hn hab
end CovariantLTSwap
section CovariantLESwap
variable [Preorder β] [MulLeftMono M] [MulRightMono M]
@[to_additive (attr := mono, gcongr) nsmul_le_nsmul_right]
theorem pow_le_pow_left' {a b : M} (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ i : ℕ, a ^ i ≤ b ^ i
| 0 => by simp
| k + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact mul_le_mul' (pow_le_pow_left' hab k) hab
@[to_additive Monotone.const_nsmul]
theorem Monotone.pow_const {f : β → M} (hf : Monotone f) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monotone fun a => f a ^ n
| 0 => by simpa using monotone_const
| n + 1 => by
simp_rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monotone.pow_const hf _).mul' hf
@[to_additive nsmul_right_mono]
theorem pow_left_mono (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun a : M => a ^ n := monotone_id.pow_const _
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
lemma pow_le_pow {a b : M} (hab : a ≤ b) (ht : 1 ≤ b) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : a ^ m ≤ b ^ n :=
(pow_le_pow_left' hab _).trans (pow_le_pow_right' ht hmn)
end CovariantLESwap
end Preorder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup M] [MulLeftMono M] [MulRightMono M] {a b : M} {n : ℕ}
lemma le_pow_sup : a ^ n ⊔ b ^ n ≤ (a ⊔ b) ^ n :=
sup_le (pow_le_pow_left' le_sup_left _) (pow_le_pow_left' le_sup_right _)
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf M] [MulLeftMono M] [MulRightMono M] {a b : M} {n : ℕ}
lemma pow_inf_le : (a ⊓ b) ^ n ≤ a ^ n ⊓ b ^ n :=
le_inf (pow_le_pow_left' inf_le_left _) (pow_le_pow_left' inf_le_right _)
end SemilatticeInf
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder M]
section CovariantLE
variable [MulLeftMono M]
-- This generalises to lattices. See `pow_two_semiclosed`
| @[to_additive nsmul_nonneg_iff]
theorem one_le_pow_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ n ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt fun h => pow_lt_one' h hn, fun h => one_le_pow_of_one_le' h n⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_le_one_iff {x : M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 :=
one_le_pow_iff (M := Mᵒᵈ) hn
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Unbundled/Pow.lean | 205 | 211 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
## References
* [Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.][Hytonen_VanNeerven_Veraar_Wies_2016]
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : ℕ → α} {m : ℕ}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· simp [Set.preimage, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_cod
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_dom
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {b : β} : StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one [One β] : StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) := stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
section aux
omit [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete`. -/
private noncomputable def simpleFuncAux (f : α → β) (g : ℕ → α) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β
| 0 => .const _ (f (g 0))
| n + 1 => .piecewise {g n} (.singleton _) (.const _ <| f (g n)) (simpleFuncAux f g n)
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt : ∀ n > m, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m)
| _, .refl => by simp [simpleFuncAux]
| _, Nat.le.step (m := n) hmn => by
obtain hnm | hnm := eq_or_ne (g n) (g m) <;>
simp [simpleFuncAux, Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem , hnm.symm, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt _ hmn]
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m) :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨_, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt⟩
end aux
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete [Countable α] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
nontriviality β
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_surjective_nat α
exact ⟨simpleFuncAux f g, hg.forall.2 fun m ↦
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq⟩
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete (since := "2025-04-09")]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] : StronglyMeasurable f := .of_discrete
end StronglyMeasurable
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀ h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq, ← Finset.mem_coe]
classical
refine fun n => measure_biUnion_lt_top {y ∈ (fs n).range | y ≠ 0}.finite_toSet fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
protected theorem prodMk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prodMk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] protected alias prod_mk := StronglyMeasurable.prodMk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_right
protected theorem prod_swap {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β × α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
protected theorem fst {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_fst
protected theorem snd [mα : MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk stronglyMeasurable_const)
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Max β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Min β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : IsEmbedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : IsClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.injective.preimage_image] at this
/-- A sequential limit of strongly measurable functions is strongly measurable. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
StronglyMeasurable g := by
borelize β
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' u (fun i => (hf i).measurable) lim
· rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ i, range (f (v i)))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun i => (hf (v i)).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto ((lim x).comp hv)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
protected theorem piecewise {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
{_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (Set.piecewise s f g) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hf.tendsto_approx x
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hg.tendsto_approx x
/-- this is slightly different from `StronglyMeasurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`StronglyMeasurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact StronglyMeasurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) stronglyMeasurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_const`, but replacing `StronglyMeasurable.ite` by
`StronglyMeasurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
protected theorem ite {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {p : α → Prop}
{_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a }) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
StronglyMeasurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {g' : γ → β}
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg' : StronglyMeasurable g') :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.extend g f g') := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.extend (hf.approx n) g hg (hg'.approx n), ?_⟩
intro x
by_cases hx : ∃ y, g y = x
· rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa only [SimpleFunc.extend_apply, hg.injective, Injective.extend_apply] using
hf.tendsto_approx y
· simpa only [hx, SimpleFunc.extend_apply', not_false_iff, extend_apply'] using
hg'.tendsto_approx x
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hne : γ → Nonempty β) :
∃ f' : γ → β, StronglyMeasurable f' ∧ f' ∘ g = f :=
⟨Function.extend g f fun x => Classical.choice (hne x),
hg.stronglyMeasurable_extend hf (stronglyMeasurable_const' fun _ _ => rfl),
funext fun _ => hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : StronglyMeasurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : StronglyMeasurable fun a : t => f a) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality β; inhabit β
suffices Function.extend Subtype.val (fun x : s ↦ f x)
(Function.extend (↑) (fun x : t ↦ f x) fun _ ↦ default) = f from
this ▸ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).stronglyMeasurable_extend hc <|
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe ht).stronglyMeasurable_extend hd stronglyMeasurable_const
ext x
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· lift x to s using hxs
simp [Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
· lift x to t using (h trivial).resolve_left hxs
rw [extend_apply', Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
exact fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ hxs <| hy ▸ y.2
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h₁ : StronglyMeasurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : StronglyMeasurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁
h₂
@[measurability]
protected theorem indicator {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant indicator functions of measurable sets and that it is closed under
addition and pointwise limit.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction with`. -/
theorem induction [MeasurableSpace α] [AddZeroClass β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(ind : ∀ c ⦃s : Set α⦄ (hs : MeasurableSet s),
P (s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) (stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator hs))
(add : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hfg : StronglyMeasurable (f + g)), Disjoint f.support g.support →
P f hf → P g hg → P (f + g) hfg)
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n using SimpleFunc.induction with
| const c hs => exact ind c hs
| @add f g h_supp hf hg =>
exact add f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable (f + g).stronglyMeasurable h_supp hf hg
open scoped Classical in
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant functions and that it is closed under piecewise combination of functions
and pointwise limits.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction' with`. -/
theorem induction' [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(const : ∀ (c), P (fun _ ↦ c) stronglyMeasurable_const)
(pcw : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ {s} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s), P f hf → P g hg → P (s.piecewise f g) (hf.piecewise hs hg))
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n with
| const c => exact const c
| @pcw f g s hs Pf Pg =>
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact pcw f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable hs Pf Pg
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem dist {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f g : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => dist (f x) (g x) :=
continuous_dist.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[measurability]
protected theorem norm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
@[measurability]
protected theorem nnnorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
/-- The `enorm` of a strongly measurable function is measurable.
Unlike `StrongMeasurable.norm` and `StronglyMeasurable.nnnorm`, this lemma proves measurability,
**not** strong measurability. This is an intentional decision: for functions taking values in
ℝ≥0∞, measurability is much more useful than strong measurability. -/
@[fun_prop, measurability]
protected theorem enorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
{f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
(ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf.nnnorm).measurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ennnorm := StronglyMeasurable.enorm
@[measurability]
protected theorem real_toNNReal {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x).toNNReal :=
continuous_real_toNNReal.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
section PseudoMetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Preorder E] [OrderClosedTopology E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_le (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a ≤ g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_le_prod.measurableSet
lemma measurableSet_lt (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a < g a} := by
simpa only [lt_iff_le_not_le] using (hf.measurableSet_le hg).inter (hg.measurableSet_le hf).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyLE, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_le hg).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_le_of_ae_le_trim, ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end PseudoMetrizableSpace
section MetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [MetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_eq_fun (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a = g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_diagonal.measurableSet
lemma ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
| exact (hf.measurableSet_eq_fun hg).compl
lemma ae_eq_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim, ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 913 | 917 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jiale Miao. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jiale Miao, Kevin Buzzard, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
/-!
# Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization
In this file we introduce Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization and Orthonormalization.
The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span.
## Main results
- `gramSchmidt` : the Gram-Schmidt process
- `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` :
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors.
- `span_gramSchmidt` :
`gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors.
- `gramSchmidt_ne_zero` :
If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero.
- `gramSchmidt_basis` :
The basis produced by the Gram-Schmidt process when given a basis as input.
- `gramSchmidtNormed` :
the normalized `gramSchmidt` (i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.)
- `gramSchmidt_orthonormal` :
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors.
- `gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis`: orthonormal basis constructed by the Gram-Schmidt process from
an indexed set of vectors of the right size
-/
open Finset Submodule Module
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [WellFoundedLT ι]
attribute [local instance] IsWellOrder.toHasWellFounded
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- The Gram-Schmidt process takes a set of vectors as input
and outputs a set of orthogonal vectors which have the same span. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidt [WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
f n - ∑ i : Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt f i).orthogonalProjection (f n)
termination_by n
decreasing_by exact mem_Iio.1 i.2
/-- This lemma uses `∑ i in` instead of `∑ i :`. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_def (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n = f n - ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [← sum_attach, attach_eq_univ, gramSchmidt]
theorem gramSchmidt_def' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n, (𝕜 ∙ gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i).orthogonalProjection (f n) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, sub_add_cancel]
theorem gramSchmidt_def'' (f : ι → E) (n : ι) :
f n = gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n + ∑ i ∈ Iio n,
(⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i, f n⟫ / (‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i := by
convert gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f n
rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton, RCLike.ofReal_pow]
@[simp]
theorem gramSchmidt_zero {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrder ι] [OrderBot ι]
[WellFoundedLT ι] (f : ι → E) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f ⊥ = f ⊥ := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def, Iio_eq_Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, sub_zero]
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalisation**:
`gramSchmidt` produces an orthogonal system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthogonal (f : ι → E) {a b : ι} (h₀ : a ≠ b) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := by
suffices ∀ a b : ι, a < b → ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 by
rcases h₀.lt_or_lt with ha | hb
· exact this _ _ ha
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact this _ _ hb
clear h₀ a b
intro a b h₀
revert a
apply wellFounded_lt.induction b
intro b ih a h₀
simp only [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f b, inner_sub_right, inner_sum, orthogonalProjection_singleton,
inner_smul_right]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem a (Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h₀)]
· by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a = 0
· simp only [h, inner_zero_left, zero_div, zero_mul, sub_zero]
· rw [RCLike.ofReal_pow, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, div_mul_cancel₀, sub_self]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
intro i hi hia
simp only [mul_eq_zero, div_eq_zero_iff, inner_self_eq_zero]
right
rcases hia.lt_or_lt with hia₁ | hia₂
· rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact ih a h₀ i hia₁
· exact ih i (mem_Iio.1 hi) a hia₂
/-- This is another version of `gramSchmidt_orthogonal` using `Pairwise` instead. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_pairwise_orthogonal (f : ι → E) :
Pairwise fun a b => ⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 f a, gramSchmidt 𝕜 f b⟫ = 0 := fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
theorem gramSchmidt_inv_triangular (v : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) :
⟪gramSchmidt 𝕜 v j, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def'' 𝕜 v]
simp only [inner_add_right, inner_sum, inner_smul_right]
set b : ι → E := gramSchmidt 𝕜 v
convert zero_add (0 : 𝕜)
· exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v hij.ne'
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
rintro k hki'
have hki : k < i := by simpa using hki'
have : ⟪b j, b k⟫ = 0 := gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 v (hki.trans hij).ne'
simp [this]
open Submodule Set Order
theorem mem_span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j) := by
rw [gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
exact Submodule.add_mem _ (subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hij)
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => smul_mem (span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic j)) _ <|
subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) <| (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).le.trans hij)
theorem gramSchmidt_mem_span (f : ι → E) :
∀ {j i}, i ≤ j → gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) := by
intro j i hij
rw [gramSchmidt_def 𝕜 f i]
simp_rw [orthogonalProjection_singleton]
refine Submodule.sub_mem _ (subset_span (mem_image_of_mem _ hij))
(Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_)
let hkj : k < j := (Finset.mem_Iio.1 hk).trans_le hij
exact smul_mem _ _
(span_mono (image_subset f <| Set.Iic_subset_Iic.2 hkj.le) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ le_rfl)
termination_by j => j
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iic (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iic c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _
theorem span_gramSchmidt_Iio (f : ι → E) (c : ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' Set.Iio c) = span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio c) :=
span_eq_span (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun _ hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 hi) <| mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _ le_rfl
/-- `gramSchmidt` preserves span of vectors. -/
theorem span_gramSchmidt (f : ι → E) : span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f)) = span 𝕜 (range f) :=
span_eq_span (range_subset_iff.2 fun _ =>
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) <| gramSchmidt_mem_span _ _ le_rfl) <|
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ =>
span_mono (image_subset_range _ _) <| mem_span_gramSchmidt _ _ le_rfl
theorem gramSchmidt_of_orthogonal {f : ι → E} (hf : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪f i, f j⟫ = 0) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f = f := by
ext i
rw [gramSchmidt_def]
trans f i - 0
· congr
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro j hj
rw [Submodule.coe_eq_zero]
suffices span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iic j) ⟂ 𝕜 ∙ f i by
apply orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_orthogonalComplement_eq_zero
rw [mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
rw [← mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right]
exact this (gramSchmidt_mem_span 𝕜 f (le_refl j))
rw [isOrtho_span]
rintro u ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ v (rfl : v = f i)
apply hf
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt hk (Finset.mem_Iio.mp hj)).ne
· simp
variable {𝕜}
theorem gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe {f : ι → E} (n : ι)
(h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι))) : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
have h₁ : f n ∈ span 𝕜 (f '' Set.Iio n) := by
rw [← span_gramSchmidt_Iio 𝕜 f n, gramSchmidt_def' 𝕜 f, h, zero_add]
apply Submodule.sum_mem _ _
intro a ha
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_Iio, orthogonalProjection_singleton]
apply Submodule.smul_mem _ _ _
rw [Finset.mem_Iio] at ha
exact subset_span ⟨a, ha, by rfl⟩
have h₂ : (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι)) ⟨n, le_refl n⟩ ∈
span 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι) '' Set.Iio ⟨n, le_refl n⟩) := by
rw [image_comp]
simpa using h₁
apply LinearIndependent.not_mem_span_image h₀ _ h₂
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_iff]
/-- If the input vectors of `gramSchmidt` are linearly independent,
then the output vectors are non-zero. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_ne_zero {f : ι → E} (n : ι) (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n ≠ 0 :=
gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe _ (LinearIndependent.comp h₀ _ Subtype.coe_injective)
/-- `gramSchmidt` produces a triangular matrix of vectors when given a basis. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_triangular {i j : ι} (hij : i < j) (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
b.repr (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i) j = 0 := by
have : gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i ∈ span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b '' Set.Iio j) :=
subset_span ((Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨i, hij, rfl⟩)
have : gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i ∈ span 𝕜 (b '' Set.Iio j) := by rwa [← span_gramSchmidt_Iio 𝕜 b j]
have : ↑(b.repr (gramSchmidt 𝕜 b i)).support ⊆ Set.Iio j :=
Basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span b (Set.Iio j) this
exact (Finsupp.mem_supported' _ _).1 ((Finsupp.mem_supported 𝕜 _).2 this) j Set.not_mem_Iio_self
/-- `gramSchmidt` produces linearly independent vectors when given linearly independent vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_linearIndependent {f : ι → E} (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
LinearIndependent 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f) :=
linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero (fun _ => gramSchmidt_ne_zero _ h₀) fun _ _ =>
gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f
/-- When given a basis, `gramSchmidt` produces a basis. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtBasis (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : Basis ι 𝕜 E :=
Basis.mk (gramSchmidt_linearIndependent b.linearIndependent)
((span_gramSchmidt 𝕜 b).trans b.span_eq).ge
theorem coe_gramSchmidtBasis (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : (gramSchmidtBasis b : ι → E) = gramSchmidt 𝕜 b :=
Basis.coe_mk _ _
variable (𝕜) in
/-- the normalized `gramSchmidt`
(i.e each vector in `gramSchmidtNormed` has unit length.) -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtNormed (f : ι → E) (n : ι) : E :=
(‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹ • gramSchmidt 𝕜 f n
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length_coe {f : ι → E} (n : ι)
(h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 (f ∘ ((↑) : Set.Iic n → ι))) : ‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 := by
simp only [gramSchmidt_ne_zero_coe n h₀, gramSchmidtNormed, norm_smul_inv_norm, Ne,
not_false_iff]
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length {f : ι → E} (n : ι) (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 :=
gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length_coe _ (LinearIndependent.comp h₀ _ Subtype.coe_injective)
theorem gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length' {f : ι → E} {n : ι} (hn : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n ≠ 0) :
‖gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f n‖ = 1 := by
rw [gramSchmidtNormed] at *
rw [norm_smul_inv_norm]
simpa using hn
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization**:
`gramSchmidtNormed` applied to a linearly independent set of vectors produces an orthornormal
system of vectors. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthonormal {f : ι → E} (h₀ : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) := by
unfold Orthonormal
constructor
· simp only [gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length, h₀, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
· intro i j hij
simp only [gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, RCLike.conj_inv,
RCLike.conj_ofReal, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
repeat' right
exact gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f hij
/-- **Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalization**:
`gramSchmidtNormed` produces an orthornormal system of vectors after removing the vectors which
become zero in the process. -/
theorem gramSchmidt_orthonormal' (f : ι → E) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 fun i : { i | gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i ≠ 0 } => gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i := by
refine ⟨fun i => gramSchmidtNormed_unit_length' i.prop, ?_⟩
rintro i j (hij : ¬_)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at hij
simp [gramSchmidtNormed, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, gramSchmidt_orthogonal 𝕜 f hij]
theorem span_gramSchmidtNormed (f : ι → E) (s : Set ι) :
span 𝕜 (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f '' s) = span 𝕜 (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f '' s) := by
refine span_eq_span
(Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun i hi => smul_mem _ _ <| subset_span <| mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
(Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun i hi =>
span_mono (image_subset _ <| singleton_subset_set_iff.2 hi) ?_)
simp only [coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
by_cases h : gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i = 0
· simp [h]
· refine mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨‖gramSchmidt 𝕜 f i‖, smul_inv_smul₀ ?_ _⟩
exact mod_cast norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h
theorem span_gramSchmidtNormed_range (f : ι → E) :
span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f)) = span 𝕜 (range (gramSchmidt 𝕜 f)) := by
simpa only [image_univ.symm] using span_gramSchmidtNormed f univ
section OrthonormalBasis
variable [Fintype ι] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (h : finrank 𝕜 E = Fintype.card ι) (f : ι → E)
/-- Given an indexed family `f : ι → E` of vectors in an inner product space `E`, for which the
size of the index set is the dimension of `E`, produce an orthonormal basis for `E` which agrees
with the orthonormal set produced by the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process on the elements of
`ι` for which this process gives a nonzero number. -/
noncomputable def gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis : OrthonormalBasis ι 𝕜 E :=
((gramSchmidt_orthonormal' f).exists_orthonormalBasis_extension_of_card_eq
(v := gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) h).choose
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply {f : ι → E} {i : ι} (hi : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i ≠ 0) :
gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i = gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i :=
((gramSchmidt_orthonormal' f).exists_orthonormalBasis_extension_of_card_eq
| (v := gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f) h).choose_spec i hi
theorem gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply_of_orthogonal {f : ι → E}
(hf : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪f i, f j⟫ = 0) {i : ι} (hi : f i ≠ 0) :
gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis h f i = (‖f i‖⁻¹ : 𝕜) • f i := by
have H : gramSchmidtNormed 𝕜 f i = (‖f i‖⁻¹ : 𝕜) • f i := by
rw [gramSchmidtNormed, gramSchmidt_of_orthogonal 𝕜 hf]
rw [gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_apply h, H]
simpa [H] using hi
theorem inner_gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_eq_zero {f : ι → E} {i : ι}
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/GramSchmidtOrtho.lean | 308 | 318 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.hasProd_iff := IsInducing.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
| ⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 212 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Semantics
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Equiv
/-!
# First Order Language of Rings
This file defines the first order language of rings, as well as defining instance of `Add`, `Mul`,
etc. on terms in the language.
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.ring` : the language of rings, with function symbols `+`, `*`, `-`, `0`, `1`
- `FirstOrder.Ring.CompatibleRing` : A class stating that a type is a `Language.ring.Structure`, and
that this structure is the same as the structure given by the classes `Add`, `Mul`, etc. already
on `R`.
- `FirstOrder.Ring.compatibleRingOfRing` : Given a type `R` with instances for each of the `Ring`
operations, make a `compatibleRing` instance.
## Implementation Notes
There are implementation difficulties with the model theory of rings caused by the fact that there
are two different ways to say that `R` is a `Ring`. We can say `Ring R` or
`Language.ring.Structure R` and `Theory.ring.Model R` (The theory of rings is not implemented yet).
The recommended way to use this library is to use the hypotheses `CompatibleRing R` and `Ring R`
on any theorem that requires both a `Ring` instance and a `Language.ring.Structure` instance
in order to state the theorem. To apply such a theorem to a ring `R` with a `Ring` instance,
use the tactic `let _ := compatibleRingOfRing R`. To apply the theorem to `K`
a `Language.ring.Structure K` instance and for example an instance of `Theory.field.Model K`,
you must add local instances with definitions like `ModelTheory.Field.fieldOfModelField K` and
`FirstOrder.Ring.compatibleRingOfModelField K`.
(in `Mathlib/ModelTheory/Algebra/Field/Basic.lean`), depending on the Theory.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace FirstOrder
open FirstOrder
/-- The type of Ring functions, to be used in the definition of the language of rings.
It contains the operations (+,*,-,0,1) -/
inductive ringFunc : ℕ → Type
| add : ringFunc 2
| mul : ringFunc 2
| neg : ringFunc 1
| zero : ringFunc 0
| one : ringFunc 0
deriving DecidableEq
/-- The language of rings contains the operations (+,*,-,0,1) -/
def Language.ring : Language :=
{ Functions := ringFunc
Relations := fun _ => Empty }
deriving IsAlgebraic
namespace Ring
open ringFunc Language
/-- This instance does not get inferred without `instDecidableEqFunctions` in
`ModelTheory/Basic`. -/
example (n : ℕ) : DecidableEq (Language.ring.Functions n) := inferInstance
/-- This instance does not get inferred without `instDecidableEqRelations` in
`ModelTheory/Basic`. -/
example (n : ℕ) : DecidableEq (Language.ring.Relations n) := inferInstance
/-- `RingFunc.add`, but with the defeq type `Language.ring.Functions 2` instead
of `RingFunc 2` -/
abbrev addFunc : Language.ring.Functions 2 := add
/-- `RingFunc.mul`, but with the defeq type `Language.ring.Functions 2` instead
of `RingFunc 2` -/
abbrev mulFunc : Language.ring.Functions 2 := mul
/-- `RingFunc.neg`, but with the defeq type `Language.ring.Functions 1` instead
of `RingFunc 1` -/
abbrev negFunc : Language.ring.Functions 1 := neg
/-- `RingFunc.zero`, but with the defeq type `Language.ring.Functions 0` instead
of `RingFunc 0` -/
abbrev zeroFunc : Language.ring.Functions 0 := zero
/-- `RingFunc.one`, but with the defeq type `Language.ring.Functions 0` instead
of `RingFunc 0` -/
abbrev oneFunc : Language.ring.Functions 0 := one
instance (α : Type*) : Zero (Language.ring.Term α) :=
{ zero := Constants.term zeroFunc }
theorem zero_def (α : Type*) : (0 : Language.ring.Term α) = Constants.term zeroFunc := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : One (Language.ring.Term α) :=
{ one := Constants.term oneFunc }
theorem one_def (α : Type*) : (1 : Language.ring.Term α) = Constants.term oneFunc := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : Add (Language.ring.Term α) :=
{ add := addFunc.apply₂ }
theorem add_def (α : Type*) (t₁ t₂ : Language.ring.Term α) :
t₁ + t₂ = addFunc.apply₂ t₁ t₂ := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : Mul (Language.ring.Term α) :=
{ mul := mulFunc.apply₂ }
theorem mul_def (α : Type*) (t₁ t₂ : Language.ring.Term α) :
t₁ * t₂ = mulFunc.apply₂ t₁ t₂ := rfl
instance (α : Type*) : Neg (Language.ring.Term α) :=
{ neg := negFunc.apply₁ }
theorem neg_def (α : Type*) (t : Language.ring.Term α) :
-t = negFunc.apply₁ t := rfl
instance : Fintype Language.ring.Symbols :=
⟨⟨Multiset.ofList
[Sum.inl ⟨2, .add⟩,
Sum.inl ⟨2, .mul⟩,
Sum.inl ⟨1, .neg⟩,
Sum.inl ⟨0, .zero⟩,
Sum.inl ⟨0, .one⟩], by
dsimp [Language.Symbols]; decide⟩, by
intro x
dsimp [Language.Symbols]
rcases x with ⟨_, f⟩ | ⟨_, f⟩
· cases f <;> decide
· cases f ⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_ring : card Language.ring = 5 := by
have : Fintype.card Language.ring.Symbols = 5 := rfl
simp [Language.card, this]
open Language Structure
/-- A Type `R` is a `CompatibleRing` if it is a structure for the language of rings and this
structure is the same as the structure already given on `R` by the classes `Add`, `Mul` etc.
It is recommended to use this type class as a hypothesis to any theorem whose statement
requires a type to have be both a `Ring` (or `Field` etc.) and a
`Language.ring.Structure` -/
/- This class does not extend `Add` etc, because this way it can be used in
combination with a `Ring`, or `Field` instance without having multiple different
`Add` structures on the Type. -/
class CompatibleRing (R : Type*) [Add R] [Mul R] [Neg R] [One R] [Zero R]
extends Language.ring.Structure R where
/-- Addition in the `Language.ring.Structure` is the same as the addition given by the
`Add` instance -/
funMap_add : ∀ x, funMap addFunc x = x 0 + x 1
/-- Multiplication in the `Language.ring.Structure` is the same as the multiplication given by the
`Mul` instance -/
funMap_mul : ∀ x, funMap mulFunc x = x 0 * x 1
/-- Negation in the `Language.ring.Structure` is the same as the negation given by the
`Neg` instance -/
funMap_neg : ∀ x, funMap negFunc x = -x 0
/-- The constant `0` in the `Language.ring.Structure` is the same as the constant given by the
`Zero` instance -/
funMap_zero : ∀ x, funMap (zeroFunc : Language.ring.Constants) x = 0
/-- The constant `1` in the `Language.ring.Structure` is the same as the constant given by the
`One` instance -/
funMap_one : ∀ x, funMap (oneFunc : Language.ring.Constants) x = 1
open CompatibleRing
attribute [simp] funMap_add funMap_mul funMap_neg funMap_zero funMap_one
section
variable {R : Type*} [Add R] [Mul R] [Neg R] [One R] [Zero R] [CompatibleRing R]
@[simp]
theorem realize_add (x y : ring.Term α) (v : α → R) :
Term.realize v (x + y) = Term.realize v x + Term.realize v y := by
simp [add_def, funMap_add]
@[simp]
theorem realize_mul (x y : ring.Term α) (v : α → R) :
Term.realize v (x * y) = Term.realize v x * Term.realize v y := by
simp [mul_def, funMap_mul]
| @[simp]
theorem realize_neg (x : ring.Term α) (v : α → R) :
Term.realize v (-x) = -Term.realize v x := by
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Algebra/Ring/Basic.lean | 190 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Gluing
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Diagonal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ChosenFiniteProducts.Over
/-!
# Fibred products of schemes
In this file we construct the fibred product of schemes via gluing.
We roughly follow [har77] Theorem 3.3.
In particular, the main construction is to show that for an open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `X`, if there
exist fibred products `Uᵢ ×[Z] Y` for each `i`, then there exists a fibred product `X ×[Z] Y`.
Then, for constructing the fibred product for arbitrary schemes `X, Y, Z`, we can use the
construction to reduce to the case where `X, Y, Z` are all affine, where fibred products are
constructed via tensor products.
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme
namespace Pullback
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : OpenCover.{u} X) (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [∀ i, HasPullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g]
/-- The intersection of `Uᵢ ×[Z] Y` and `Uⱼ ×[Z] Y` is given by (Uᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uⱼ -/
def v (i j : 𝒰.J) : Scheme :=
pullback ((pullback.fst (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g) ≫ 𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map j)
/-- The canonical transition map `(Uᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uⱼ ⟶ (Uⱼ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uᵢ` given by the fact
that pullbacks are associative and symmetric. -/
def t (i j : 𝒰.J) : v 𝒰 f g i j ⟶ v 𝒰 f g j i := by
have : HasPullback (pullback.snd _ _ ≫ 𝒰.map i ≫ f) g :=
hasPullback_assoc_symm (𝒰.map j) (𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g
have : HasPullback (pullback.snd _ _ ≫ 𝒰.map j ≫ f) g :=
hasPullback_assoc_symm (𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map j) (𝒰.map j ≫ f) g
refine (pullbackSymmetry ..).hom ≫ (pullbackAssoc ..).inv ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackAssoc ..).hom ≫ (pullbackSymmetry ..).hom
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· rw [pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc, pullback.condition_assoc, Category.comp_id]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_fst_fst (i j : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_fst,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_fst,
pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_fst_snd (i j : 𝒰.J) :
t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_snd,
pullback.lift_snd, Category.comp_id, pullbackAssoc_inv_snd, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_snd (i j : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd, pullbackAssoc_hom_fst,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_snd,
pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc]
theorem t_id (i : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i i = 𝟙 _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> rw [Category.id_comp]
· apply pullback.hom_ext
· rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]; simp only [pullback.condition, Category.assoc, t_fst_fst]
· simp only [Category.assoc, t_fst_snd]
· rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]; simp only [pullback.condition, t_snd, Category.assoc]
/-- The inclusion map of `V i j = (Uᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uⱼ ⟶ Uᵢ ×[Z] Y` -/
abbrev fV (i j : 𝒰.J) : v 𝒰 f g i j ⟶ pullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g :=
pullback.fst _ _
/-- The map `((Xᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xⱼ) ×[Xᵢ ×[Z] Y] ((Xᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xₖ)` ⟶
`((Xⱼ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xₖ) ×[Xⱼ ×[Z] Y] ((Xⱼ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xᵢ)` needed for gluing -/
def t' (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
pullback (fV 𝒰 f g i j) (fV 𝒰 f g i k) ⟶ pullback (fV 𝒰 f g j k) (fV 𝒰 f g j i) := by
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso ..).hom ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso ..).inv
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (t 𝒰 f g i j) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· simp_rw [Category.comp_id, t_fst_fst_assoc, ← pullback.condition]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_fst_fst_fst (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_fst,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_fst_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_snd,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
@[simp, reassoc]
| theorem t'_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_snd, pullback.lift_snd, Category.comp_id,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_snd]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Pullbacks.lean | 118 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
/-!
# Primality and GCD on pnat
This file extends the theory of `ℕ+` with `gcd`, `lcm` and `Prime` functions, analogous to those on
`Nat`.
-/
namespace Nat.Primes
/-- The canonical map from `Nat.Primes` to `ℕ+` -/
@[coe] def toPNat : Nat.Primes → ℕ+ :=
fun p => ⟨(p : ℕ), p.property.pos⟩
instance coePNat : Coe Nat.Primes ℕ+ :=
⟨toPNat⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pnat_nat (p : Nat.Primes) : ((p : ℕ+) : ℕ) = p :=
rfl
theorem coe_pnat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) := fun p q h =>
Subtype.ext (by injection h)
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pnat_inj (p q : Nat.Primes) : (p : ℕ+) = (q : ℕ+) ↔ p = q :=
coe_pnat_injective.eq_iff
end Nat.Primes
namespace PNat
open Nat
/-- The greatest common divisor (gcd) of two positive natural numbers,
viewed as positive natural number. -/
def gcd (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left (m : ℕ) n.pos⟩
/-- The least common multiple (lcm) of two positive natural numbers,
viewed as positive natural number. -/
def lcm (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), by
let h := mul_pos n.pos m.pos
rw [← gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), mul_comm] at h
exact pos_of_dvd_of_pos (Dvd.intro (Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ)) rfl) h⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem gcd_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (gcd n m : ℕ) = Nat.gcd n m :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lcm_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (lcm n m : ℕ) = Nat.lcm n m :=
rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_left (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem gcd_dvd_right (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : k ∣ m) (hn : k ∣ n) : k ∣ gcd m n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_gcd (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
theorem dvd_lcm_left (n m : ℕ+) : n ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem dvd_lcm_right (n m : ℕ+) : m ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : m ∣ k) (hn : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
dvd_iff.2 (@Nat.lcm_dvd (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m * lcm n m = n * m :=
Subtype.eq (Nat.gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem eq_one_of_lt_two {n : ℕ+} : n < 2 → n = 1 := by
intro h; apply le_antisymm; swap
· apply PNat.one_le
· exact PNat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h
section Prime
/-! ### Prime numbers -/
/-- Primality predicate for `ℕ+`, defined in terms of `Nat.Prime`. -/
def Prime (p : ℕ+) : Prop :=
(p : ℕ).Prime
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → 1 < p :=
Nat.Prime.one_lt
theorem prime_two : (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_two
instance {p : ℕ+} [h : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime := h
instance fact_prime_two : Fact (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_two⟩
theorem prime_three : (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_three
instance fact_prime_three : Fact (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_three⟩
theorem prime_five : (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_five
instance fact_prime_five : Fact (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_five⟩
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ+} (pp : p.Prime) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
rw [PNat.dvd_iff]
rw [Nat.dvd_prime pp]
simp
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → p ≠ 1 := by
intro pp
intro contra
apply Nat.Prime.ne_one pp
rw [PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
apply contra
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬(1 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → ¬p ∣ 1 := fun pp : p.Prime => by
rw [dvd_iff]
apply Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one pp
theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ+} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p : ℕ+, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd (mt coe_eq_one_iff.mp hn)
exists (⟨p, Nat.Prime.pos hp.left⟩ : ℕ+); rw [dvd_iff]; apply hp
end Prime
section Coprime
/-! ### Coprime numbers and gcd -/
/-- Two pnats are coprime if their gcd is 1. -/
def Coprime (m n : ℕ+) : Prop :=
m.gcd n = 1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coprime_coe {m n : ℕ+} : Nat.Coprime ↑m ↑n ↔ m.Coprime n := by
unfold Nat.Coprime Coprime
rw [← coe_inj]
simp
theorem Coprime.mul {k m n : ℕ+} : m.Coprime k → n.Coprime k → (m * n).Coprime k := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul
theorem Coprime.mul_right {k m n : ℕ+} : k.Coprime m → k.Coprime n → k.Coprime (m * n) := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul_right
theorem gcd_comm {m n : ℕ+} : m.gcd n = n.gcd m := by
apply eq
simp only [gcd_coe]
apply Nat.gcd_comm
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : m.gcd n = m ↔ m ∣ n := by
rw [dvd_iff, ← Nat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd, ← coe_inj]
simp
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : n.gcd m = m ↔ m ∣ n := by
rw [gcd_comm]
apply gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime n → (k * m).gcd n = m.gcd n := by
intro h; apply eq; simp only [gcd_coe, mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel; simpa
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime n → (m * k).gcd n = m.gcd n := by rw [mul_comm]; apply Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime m → m.gcd (k * n) = m.gcd n := by
intro h; iterate 2 rw [gcd_comm]; symm
apply Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel _ h
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel_right (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime m → m.gcd (n * k) = m.gcd n := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem one_gcd {n : ℕ+} : gcd 1 n = 1 := by
rw [gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd]
apply one_dvd
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one {n : ℕ+} : gcd n 1 = 1 := by
rw [gcd_comm]
apply one_gcd
@[symm]
theorem Coprime.symm {m n : ℕ+} : m.Coprime n → n.Coprime m := by
unfold Coprime
rw [gcd_comm]
simp
@[simp]
theorem one_coprime {n : ℕ+} : (1 : ℕ+).Coprime n :=
one_gcd
@[simp]
theorem coprime_one {n : ℕ+} : n.Coprime 1 :=
Coprime.symm one_coprime
theorem Coprime.coprime_dvd_left {m k n : ℕ+} : m ∣ k → k.Coprime n → m.Coprime n := by
rw [dvd_iff]
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_left
theorem Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_left {a b m n : ℕ+} (cop : m.Coprime n) (am : a ∣ m) (bn : b ∣ n) :
a = (a * b).gcd m := by
rw [← gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd] at am
conv_lhs => rw [← am]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Coprime.gcd_mul_right_cancel a
apply Coprime.coprime_dvd_left bn cop.symm
theorem Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_right {a b m n : ℕ+} (cop : m.Coprime n) (am : a ∣ m) (bn : b ∣ n) :
a = (b * a).gcd m := by rw [mul_comm]; apply Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_left cop am bn
theorem Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_left_right {a b m n : ℕ+} (cop : m.Coprime n) (am : a ∣ m)
(bn : b ∣ n) : a = m.gcd (a * b) := by rw [gcd_comm]; apply Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_left cop am bn
theorem Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_right_right {a b m n : ℕ+} (cop : m.Coprime n) (am : a ∣ m)
(bn : b ∣ n) : a = m.gcd (b * a) := by
rw [gcd_comm]
apply Coprime.factor_eq_gcd_right cop am bn
theorem Coprime.gcd_mul (k : ℕ+) {m n : ℕ+} (h : m.Coprime n) :
k.gcd (m * n) = k.gcd m * k.gcd n := by
rw [← coprime_coe] at h; apply eq
simp only [gcd_coe, mul_coe]; apply Nat.Coprime.gcd_mul k h
theorem gcd_eq_left {m n : ℕ+} : m ∣ n → m.gcd n = m := by
rw [dvd_iff]
intro h
apply eq
simp only [gcd_coe]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_left h
theorem Coprime.pow {m n : ℕ+} (k l : ℕ) (h : m.Coprime n) : (m ^ k : ℕ).Coprime (n ^ l) := by
rw [← coprime_coe] at *; apply Nat.Coprime.pow; apply h
end Coprime
end PNat
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Prime.lean | 288 | 289 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
| @[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 233 | 234 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
/-!
# Characterizations of weak convergence of finite measures and probability measures
This file will provide portmanteau characterizations of the weak convergence of finite measures
and of probability measures, i.e., the standard characterizations of convergence in distribution.
## Main definitions
The topologies of weak convergence on the types of finite measures and probability measures are
already defined in their corresponding files; no substantial new definitions are introduced here.
## Main results
The main result will be the portmanteau theorem providing various characterizations of the
weak convergence of measures (probability measures or finite measures). Given measures μs
and μ on a topological space Ω, the conditions that will be proven equivalent (under quite
general hypotheses) are:
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly.
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
The separate implications are:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto` is the implication (T) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge` is the equivalence (C) ↔ (O).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier` is the implication (O) → (B).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure` is the implication (B) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_of_forall_isOpen_le_liminf` gives the implication (O) → (T) for
any sequence of Borel probability measures.
## Implementation notes
Many of the characterizations of weak convergence hold for finite measures and are proven in that
generality and then specialized to probability measures. Some implications hold with slightly
more general assumptions than in the usual statement of portmanteau theorem. The full portmanteau
theorem, however, is most convenient for probability measures on pseudo-emetrizable spaces with
their Borel sigma algebras.
Some specific considerations on the assumptions in the different implications:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto`, i.e., implication (T) → (C),
assumes that in the underlying topological space, indicator functions of closed sets have
decreasing bounded continuous pointwise approximating sequences. The assumption is in the form
of the type class `HasOuterApproxClosed`. Type class inference knows that for example the more
common assumptions of metrizability or pseudo-emetrizability suffice.
* Where formulations are currently only provided for probability measures, one can obtain the
finite measure formulations using the characterization of convergence of finite measures by
their total masses and their probability-normalized versions, i.e., by
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_normalize_iff_tendsto`.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, convergence in distribution, convergence in law, finite measure,
probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen
/-! ### Portmanteau: limsup condition for closed sets iff liminf condition for open sets
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, the following two conditions are equivalent:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
Either of these will later be shown to be equivalent to the weak convergence of the sequence
of measures.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E) :
μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [liminf_bot, le_top]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.liminf fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.liminf ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_limsup_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ) :
μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
compl_compl E ▸ le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
theorem limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.limsup fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.limsup ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_liminf_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E :=
compl_compl E ▸ limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One pair of implications of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, the following two are equivalent:
(C) The limsup of the measures of any closed set is at most the measure of the closed set
under a candidate limit measure.
(O) The liminf of the measures of any open set is at least the measure of the open set
under a candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] :
(∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F) ↔
∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G := by
constructor
· intro h G G_open
exact le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le
G_open.measurableSet (h Gᶜ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
· intro h F F_closed
exact limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl
F_closed.measurableSet (h Fᶜ (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr F_closed))
end LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen -- section
section TendstoOfNullFrontier
/-! ### Portmanteau: limit of measures of Borel sets whose boundary carries no mass in the limit
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, either of the following equivalent conditions:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
implies that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} {E₀ E E₁ : Set Ω} (E₀_subset : E₀ ⊆ E) (subset_E₁ : E ⊆ E₁)
(nulldiff : μ (E₁ \ E₀) = 0) (h_E₀ : μ E₀ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀)
(h_E₁ : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁) ≤ μ E₁) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
apply tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
· have E₀_ae_eq_E : E₀ =ᵐ[μ] E :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm E₀_subset.eventuallyLE
(subset_E₁.eventuallyLE.trans (ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff))
calc
μ E = μ E₀ := measure_congr E₀_ae_eq_E.symm
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀ := h_E₀
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
liminf_le_liminf (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono E₀_subset)
· have E_ae_eq_E₁ : E =ᵐ[μ] E₁ :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm subset_E₁.eventuallyLE
((ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff).trans E₀_subset.eventuallyLE)
calc
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁ :=
limsup_le_limsup (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono subset_E₁)
_ ≤ μ E₁ := h_E₁
_ = μ E := measure_congr E_ae_eq_E₁.symm
· infer_param
· infer_param
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, if the liminf of the measures of any open set is at
least the measure of the open set under a candidate limit measure, then for any set whose
boundary carries no probability mass under the candidate limit measure, then its measures under the
sequence converge to its measure under the candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G) {E : Set Ω}
(E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F :=
limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge.mpr h_opens
tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le interior_subset subset_closure
E_nullbdry (h_opens _ isOpen_interior) (h_closeds _ isClosed_closure)
end TendstoOfNullFrontier --section
section ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: weak convergence implies a limsup condition for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (T) implies also both
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G);
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of finite measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed set is
at most the measure of the closed set under the limit measure.
-/
theorem FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μs : ι → FiniteMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro ε ε_pos _
have ε_pos' := (ENNReal.half_pos (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr ε_pos.ne.symm)).ne.symm
let fs := F_closed.apprSeq
have key₁ : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ ω, (fs n ω : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) F)) :=
HasOuterApproxClosed.tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq F_closed (μ : Measure Ω)
have room₁ : (μ : Measure Ω) F < (μ : Measure Ω) F + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (measure_lt_top (μ : Measure Ω) F).ne ε_pos'
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp <| key₁.eventually_lt_const room₁
have key₂ := FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mp μs_lim (fs M)
have room₂ :
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) <
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_of_lt ((fs M).lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _)) ε_pos'
have ev_near := key₂.eventually_le_const room₂
have ev_near' := ev_near.mono
(fun n ↦ le_trans (HasOuterApproxClosed.measure_le_lintegral F_closed (μs n) M))
apply (Filter.limsup_le_limsup ev_near').trans
rw [limsup_const]
apply le_trans (add_le_add (hM M rfl.le).le (le_refl (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞)))
simp only [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves, le_refl]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed
set is at most the measure of the closed set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
apply FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
((tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds L).mp μs_lim) F_closed
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the liminf of the measures of any open set
is at least the measure of the open set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{G : Set Ω} (G_open : IsOpen G) :
(μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F :=
fun _ F_closed ↦ limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto μs_lim F_closed
le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le G_open.measurableSet
(h_closeds _ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' {Ω ι : Type*}
{L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
[HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω}
(μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : (μ : Measure Ω) (frontier E) = 0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) E) L (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) E)) :=
haveI h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → (μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
fun _ G_open ↦ le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto μs_lim G_open
tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier h_opens E_nullbdry
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that if the boundary of a Borel set
carries no probability mass under the limit measure, then the limit of the measures of the set
equals the measure of the set under the limit probability measure.
A version with coercions to ordinary `ℝ≥0∞`-valued measures is
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto'`.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have key := tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' μs_lim (by simpa using E_nullbdry)
exact (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal (measure_ne_top (↑μ) E)).comp key
end ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE --section
section LimitBorelImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: limit condition for Borel sets implies limsup for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B)
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (B) implies also
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
-/
open ENNReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem exists_null_frontier_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) {a b : ℝ}
(hab : a < b) : ∃ r ∈ Ioo a b, μ (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) = 0 := by
have mbles : ∀ r : ℝ, MeasurableSet (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) :=
fun r ↦ isClosed_frontier.measurableSet
have disjs := Metric.frontier_thickening_disjoint s
have key := Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion (μ := μ) mbles disjs
have aux := measure_diff_null (s := Ioo a b) (Set.Countable.measure_zero key volume)
have len_pos : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) := by simp only [hab, ENNReal.ofReal_pos, sub_pos]
rw [← Real.volume_Ioo, ← aux] at len_pos
rcases nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero len_pos.ne.symm with ⟨r, ⟨r_in_Ioo, hr⟩⟩
refine ⟨r, r_in_Ioo, ?_⟩
simpa only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt, le_zero_iff] using hr
theorem exists_null_frontiers_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) :
∃ rs : ℕ → ℝ,
Tendsto rs atTop (𝓝 0) ∧ ∀ n, 0 < rs n ∧ μ (frontier (Metric.thickening (rs n) s)) = 0 := by
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ) with ⟨Rs, ⟨_, ⟨Rs_pos, Rs_lim⟩⟩⟩
have obs := fun n : ℕ => exists_null_frontier_thickening μ s (Rs_pos n)
refine ⟨fun n : ℕ => (obs n).choose, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds Rs_lim
(fun n ↦ (obs n).choose_spec.1.1.le) fun n ↦ (obs n).choose_spec.1.2.le
· exact fun n ↦ ⟨(obs n).choose_spec.1.1, (obs n).choose_spec.2⟩
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Assuming that for all Borel sets E whose boundary ∂E carries no probability mass under a
candidate limit probability measure μ we have convergence of the measures μsᵢ(E) to μ(E),
then for all closed sets F we have the limsup condition limsup μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F). -/
lemma limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure
{Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
{μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {μs : ι → Measure Ω}
(h : ∀ {E : Set Ω}, MeasurableSet E → μ (frontier E) = 0 →
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)))
(F : Set Ω) (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
L.limsup (fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_eq_zero', zero_le]
have ex := exists_null_frontiers_thickening μ F
let rs := Classical.choose ex
have rs_lim : Tendsto rs atTop (𝓝 0) := (Classical.choose_spec ex).1
| have rs_pos : ∀ n, 0 < rs n := fun n ↦ ((Classical.choose_spec ex).2 n).1
have rs_null : ∀ n, μ (frontier (Metric.thickening (rs n) F)) = 0 :=
fun n ↦ ((Classical.choose_spec ex).2 n).2
have Fthicks_open : ∀ n, IsOpen (Metric.thickening (rs n) F) :=
fun n ↦ Metric.isOpen_thickening
have key := fun (n : ℕ) ↦ h (Fthicks_open n).measurableSet (rs_null n)
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intros ε ε_pos μF_finite
have keyB := tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed (μ := μ) (s := F)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Portmanteau.lean | 413 | 421 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.L1
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.VitaliCaratheodory
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 1,088 | 1,097 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
/-!
# Hahn Series
If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of formal series over `Γ` with
coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered. With further structure on `R` and
`Γ`, we can add further structure on `HahnSeries Γ R`, with the most studied case being when `Γ` is
a linearly ordered abelian group and `R` is a field, in which case `HahnSeries Γ R` is a
valued field, with value group `Γ`.
These generalize Laurent series (with value group `ℤ`), and Laurent series are implemented that way
in the file `Mathlib/RingTheory/LaurentSeries.lean`.
## Main Definitions
* If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of
formal series over `Γ` with coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered.
* `support x` is the subset of `Γ` whose coefficients are nonzero.
* `single a r` is the Hahn series which has coefficient `r` at `a` and zero otherwise.
* `orderTop x` is a minimal element of `WithTop Γ` where `x` has a nonzero
coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is `⊤` when `x = 0`.
* `order x` is a minimal element of `Γ` where `x` has a nonzero coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is zero
when `x = 0`.
* `map` takes each coefficient of a Hahn series to its target under a zero-preserving map.
* `embDomain` preserves coefficients, but embeds the index set `Γ` in a larger poset.
## References
- [J. van der Hoeven, *Operators on Generalized Power Series*][van_der_hoeven]
-/
open Finset Function
noncomputable section
/-- If `Γ` is linearly ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of
formal series over `Γ` with coefficients in `R`, whose supports are well-founded. -/
@[ext]
structure HahnSeries (Γ : Type*) (R : Type*) [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R] where
/-- The coefficient function of a Hahn Series. -/
coeff : Γ → R
isPWO_support' : (Function.support coeff).IsPWO
variable {Γ Γ' R S : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Zero
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : HahnSeries Γ R → Γ → R) :=
fun _ _ => HahnSeries.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj {x y : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = y.coeff ↔ x = y :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
/-- The support of a Hahn series is just the set of indices whose coefficients are nonzero.
Notably, it is well-founded. -/
nonrec def support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Set Γ :=
support x.coeff
@[simp]
theorem isPWO_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsPWO :=
x.isPWO_support'
@[simp]
theorem isWF_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsWF :=
x.isPWO_support.isWF
@[simp]
theorem mem_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (a : Γ) : a ∈ x.support ↔ x.coeff a ≠ 0 :=
Iff.refl _
instance : Zero (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨{ coeff := 0
isPWO_support' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨fun _ _ => HahnSeries.ext (by subsingleton)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero {a : Γ} : (0 : HahnSeries Γ R).coeff a = 0 :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias zero_coeff := coeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff' rfl
theorem ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
mt (fun x0 => (x0.symm ▸ coeff_zero : x.coeff g = 0)) h
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : support (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ∅ :=
Function.support_zero
@[simp]
nonrec theorem support_nonempty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support.Nonempty ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [support, support_nonempty_iff, Ne, coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support = ∅ ↔ x = 0 :=
Function.support_eq_empty_iff.trans coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
/-- The map of Hahn series induced by applying a zero-preserving map to each coefficient. -/
@[simps]
def map [Zero S] (x : HahnSeries Γ R) {F : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [ZeroHomClass F R S] (f : F) :
HahnSeries Γ S where
coeff g := f (x.coeff g)
isPWO_support' := x.isPWO_support.mono <| Function.support_comp_subset (ZeroHomClass.map_zero f) _
@[simp]
protected lemma map_zero [Zero S] (f : ZeroHom R S) :
(0 : HahnSeries Γ R).map f = 0 := by
ext; simp
/-- Change a HahnSeries with coefficients in HahnSeries to a HahnSeries on the Lex product. -/
def ofIterate [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R)) :
HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
coeff := fun g => coeff (coeff x g.1) g.2
isPWO_support' := by
refine Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.subsetProdLex ?_ ?_
· refine Set.IsPWO.mono x.isPWO_support' ?_
simp_rw [Set.image_subset_iff, support_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Function.mem_support]
exact fun _ ↦ ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
· exact fun a => by simpa [Function.mem_support, ne_eq] using (x.coeff a).isPWO_support'
@[simp]
lemma mk_eq_zero (f : Γ → R) (h) : HahnSeries.mk f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
simp_rw [HahnSeries.ext_iff, funext_iff, coeff_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- Change a Hahn series on a lex product to a Hahn series with coefficients in a Hahn series. -/
def toIterate [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R) :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) where
coeff := fun g => {
coeff := fun g' => coeff x (g, g')
isPWO_support' := Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g
}
isPWO_support' := by
have h₁ : (Function.support fun g => HahnSeries.mk (fun g' => x.coeff (g, g'))
(Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g)) = Function.support
fun g => fun g' => x.coeff (g, g') := by
simp only [Function.support, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero]
rw [h₁, Function.support_curry' x.coeff]
exact Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.imageProdLex x.isPWO_support'
/-- The equivalence between iterated Hahn series and Hahn series on the lex product. -/
@[simps]
def iterateEquiv [PartialOrder Γ'] :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) ≃ HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
toFun := ofIterate
invFun := toIterate
left_inv := congrFun rfl
right_inv := congrFun rfl
open Classical in
/-- `single a r` is the Hahn series which has coefficient `r` at `a` and zero otherwise. -/
def single (a : Γ) : ZeroHom R (HahnSeries Γ R) where
toFun r :=
{ coeff := Pi.single a r
isPWO_support' := (Set.isPWO_singleton a).mono Pi.support_single_subset }
map_zero' := HahnSeries.ext (Pi.single_zero _)
variable {a b : Γ} {r : R}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_single_same (a : Γ) (r : R) : (single a r).coeff a = r := by
classical exact Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ => R) a r
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias single_coeff_same := coeff_single_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_single_of_ne (h : b ≠ a) : (single a r).coeff b = 0 := by
classical exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) h r
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias single_coeff_of_ne := coeff_single_of_ne
open Classical in
theorem coeff_single : (single a r).coeff b = if b = a then r else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias single_coeff := coeff_single
@[simp]
theorem support_single_of_ne (h : r ≠ 0) : support (single a r) = {a} := by
classical exact Pi.support_single_of_ne h
theorem support_single_subset : support (single a r) ⊆ {a} := by
classical exact Pi.support_single_subset
theorem eq_of_mem_support_single {b : Γ} (h : b ∈ support (single a r)) : b = a :=
support_single_subset h
theorem single_eq_zero : single a (0 : R) = 0 :=
(single a).map_zero
theorem single_injective (a : Γ) : Function.Injective (single a : R → HahnSeries Γ R) :=
fun r s rs => by rw [← coeff_single_same a r, ← coeff_single_same a s, rs]
theorem single_ne_zero (h : r ≠ 0) : single a r ≠ 0 := fun con =>
h (single_injective a (con.trans single_eq_zero.symm))
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero_iff {a : Γ} {r : R} : single a r = 0 ↔ r = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff _ <| single_injective a
@[simp]
protected lemma map_single [Zero S] (f : ZeroHom R S) : (single a r).map f = single a (f r) := by
ext g
by_cases h : g = a <;> simp [h]
instance [Nonempty Γ] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨r, s, rs⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
inhabit Γ
refine ⟨single default r, single default s, fun con => rs ?_⟩
rw [← coeff_single_same (default : Γ) r, con, coeff_single_same]⟩
section Order
open Classical in
/-- The orderTop of a Hahn series `x` is a minimal element of `WithTop Γ` where `x` has a nonzero
coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is `⊤` when `x = 0`. -/
def orderTop (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : WithTop Γ :=
if h : x = 0 then ⊤ else x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_zero : orderTop (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_of_Subsingleton [Subsingleton R] {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.orderTop = ⊤ :=
(Subsingleton.eq_zero x) ▸ orderTop_zero
theorem orderTop_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
orderTop x = x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
dif_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero_iff_orderTop {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x ≠ 0 ↔ orderTop x ≠ ⊤ := by
constructor
· exact fun hx => Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun h ↦ h ≠ ⊤) (orderTop_of_ne hx)) WithTop.coe_ne_top
· contrapose!
simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
theorem orderTop_eq_top_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : orderTop x = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 := by
constructor
· contrapose!
exact ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp
· simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
theorem orderTop_eq_of_le {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (hg : g ∈ x.support)
(hx : ∀ g' ∈ x.support, g ≤ g') : orderTop x = g := by
rw [orderTop_of_ne <| support_nonempty_iff.mp <| Set.nonempty_of_mem hg,
x.isWF_support.min_eq_of_le hg hx]
theorem untop_orderTop_of_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
WithTop.untop x.orderTop (ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp hx) =
x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
WithTop.coe_inj.mp ((WithTop.coe_untop (orderTop x) (ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp hx)).trans
(orderTop_of_ne hx))
theorem coeff_orderTop_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (hg : x.orderTop = g) :
x.coeff g ≠ 0 := by
have h : orderTop x ≠ ⊤ := by simp_all only [ne_eq, WithTop.coe_ne_top, not_false_eq_true]
have hx : x ≠ 0 := ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mpr h
rw [orderTop_of_ne hx, WithTop.coe_eq_coe] at hg
rw [← hg]
exact x.isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx)
theorem orderTop_le_of_coeff_ne_zero {Γ} [LinearOrder Γ] {x : HahnSeries Γ R}
{g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x.orderTop ≤ g := by
rw [orderTop_of_ne (ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero h), WithTop.coe_le_coe]
exact Set.IsWF.min_le _ _ ((mem_support _ _).2 h)
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_single (h : r ≠ 0) : (single a r).orderTop = a :=
(orderTop_of_ne (single_ne_zero h)).trans
(WithTop.coe_inj.mpr (support_single_subset
((single a r).isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 (single_ne_zero h)))))
theorem orderTop_single_le : a ≤ (single a r).orderTop := by
by_cases hr : r = 0
· simp only [hr, map_zero, orderTop_zero, le_top]
· rw [orderTop_single hr]
theorem lt_orderTop_single {g g' : Γ} (hgg' : g < g') : g < (single g' r).orderTop :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (WithTop.coe_lt_coe.mpr hgg') orderTop_single_le
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_orderTop {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {i : Γ} (hi : i < x.orderTop) :
x.coeff i = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· exact coeff_zero
contrapose! hi
rw [← mem_support] at hi
rw [orderTop_of_ne hx, WithTop.coe_lt_coe]
exact Set.IsWF.not_lt_min _ _ hi
open Classical in
/-- A leading coefficient of a Hahn series is the coefficient of a lowest-order nonzero term, or
zero if the series vanishes. -/
def leadingCoeff (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : R :=
if h : x = 0 then 0 else x.coeff (x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h))
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem leadingCoeff_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
x.leadingCoeff = x.coeff (x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx)) :=
dif_neg hx
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.leadingCoeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
refine { mp := ?_, mpr := fun hx => hx ▸ leadingCoeff_zero }
contrapose!
exact fun hx => (leadingCoeff_of_ne hx) ▸ coeff_orderTop_ne (orderTop_of_ne hx)
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
leadingCoeff_eq_iff.not
theorem leadingCoeff_of_single {a : Γ} {r : R} : leadingCoeff (single a r) = r := by
simp only [leadingCoeff, single_eq_zero_iff]
by_cases h : r = 0 <;> simp [h]
variable [Zero Γ]
open Classical in
/-- The order of a nonzero Hahn series `x` is a minimal element of `Γ` where `x` has a
nonzero coefficient, the order of 0 is 0. -/
def order (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Γ :=
if h : x = 0 then 0 else x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem order_zero : order (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem order_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
order x = x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
dif_neg hx
theorem order_eq_orderTop_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) : order x = orderTop x := by
rw [order_of_ne hx, orderTop_of_ne hx]
theorem coeff_order_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x.coeff x.order ≠ 0 := by
rw [order_of_ne hx]
exact x.isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx)
theorem order_le_of_coeff_ne_zero {Γ} [Zero Γ] [LinearOrder Γ] {x : HahnSeries Γ R}
{g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x.order ≤ g :=
le_trans (le_of_eq (order_of_ne (ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero h)))
(Set.IsWF.min_le _ _ ((mem_support _ _).2 h))
@[simp]
theorem order_single (h : r ≠ 0) : (single a r).order = a :=
(order_of_ne (single_ne_zero h)).trans
(support_single_subset
((single a r).isWF_support.min_mem (support_nonempty_iff.2 (single_ne_zero h))))
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_order {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {i : Γ} (hi : i < x.order) :
x.coeff i = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
contrapose! hi
rw [← mem_support] at hi
rw [order_of_ne hx]
exact Set.IsWF.not_lt_min _ _ hi
theorem zero_lt_orderTop_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
0 < x.orderTop ↔ 0 < x.order := by
simp_all [orderTop_of_ne hx, order_of_ne hx]
theorem zero_lt_orderTop_of_order {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : 0 < x.order) : 0 < x.orderTop := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp_all only [order_zero, lt_self_iff_false]
· exact (zero_lt_orderTop_iff h).mpr hx
theorem zero_le_orderTop_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : 0 ≤ x.orderTop ↔ 0 ≤ x.order := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp_all
· simp_all [order_of_ne h, orderTop_of_ne h, zero_lt_orderTop_iff]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.leadingCoeff = x.coeff x.order := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· rw [h, leadingCoeff_zero, coeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff_of_ne h, order_of_ne h]
end Order
section Domain
variable [PartialOrder Γ']
open Classical in
/-- Extends the domain of a `HahnSeries` by an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def embDomain (f : Γ ↪o Γ') : HahnSeries Γ R → HahnSeries Γ' R := fun x =>
{ coeff := fun b : Γ' => if h : b ∈ f '' x.support then x.coeff (Classical.choose h) else 0
isPWO_support' :=
(x.isPWO_support.image_of_monotone f.monotone).mono fun b hb => by
contrapose! hb
rw [Function.mem_support, dif_neg hb, Classical.not_not] }
|
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_coeff {f : Γ ↪o Γ'} {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {a : Γ} :
(embDomain f x).coeff (f a) = x.coeff a := by
rw [embDomain]
dsimp only
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Basic.lean | 412 | 417 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
/-!
# Series of a relation
If `r` is a relation on `α` then a relation series of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
variable {α : Type*} (r : Rel α α)
variable {β : Type*} (s : Rel β β)
/--
Let `r` be a relation on `α`, a relation series of `r` of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
structure RelSeries where
/-- The number of inequalities in the series -/
length : ℕ
/-- The underlying function of a relation series -/
toFun : Fin (length + 1) → α
/-- Adjacent elements are related -/
step : ∀ (i : Fin length), r (toFun (Fin.castSucc i)) (toFun i.succ)
namespace RelSeries
instance : CoeFun (RelSeries r) (fun x ↦ Fin (x.length + 1) → α) :=
{ coe := RelSeries.toFun }
/--
For any type `α`, each term of `α` gives a relation series with the right most index to be 0.
-/
@[simps!] def singleton (a : α) : RelSeries r where
length := 0
toFun _ := a
step := Fin.elim0
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (RelSeries r) where
false x := IsEmpty.false (x 0)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (RelSeries r) where
default := singleton r default
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (RelSeries r) :=
Nonempty.map (singleton r) inferInstance
variable {r}
@[ext (iff := false)]
lemma ext {x y : RelSeries r} (length_eq : x.length = y.length)
(toFun_eq : x.toFun = y.toFun ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [length_eq])) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨nx, fx⟩
dsimp only at length_eq toFun_eq
subst length_eq toFun_eq
rfl
lemma rel_of_lt [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i < j) :
r (x i) (x j) :=
(Fin.liftFun_iff_succ r).mpr x.step h
lemma rel_or_eq_of_le [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) :
r (x i) (x j) ∨ x i = x j :=
(Fin.lt_or_eq_of_le h).imp (x.rel_of_lt ·) (by rw [·])
/--
Given two relations `r, s` on `α` such that `r ≤ s`, any relation series of `r` induces a relation
series of `s`
-/
@[simps!]
def ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) : RelSeries s where
length := x.length
toFun := x
step _ := h _ _ <| x.step _
lemma coe_ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) :
(x.ofLE h : _ → _) = x := rfl
/-- Every relation series gives a list -/
def toList (x : RelSeries r) : List α := List.ofFn x
@[simp]
lemma length_toList (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.length = x.length + 1 :=
List.length_ofFn
lemma toList_chain' (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.Chain' r := by
rw [List.chain'_iff_get]
intros i h
convert x.step ⟨i, by simpa [toList] using h⟩ <;> apply List.get_ofFn
lemma toList_ne_nil (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList ≠ [] := fun m =>
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mp m (x 0) <| List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- Every nonempty list satisfying the chain condition gives a relation series -/
@[simps]
def fromListChain' (x : List α) (x_ne_nil : x ≠ []) (hx : x.Chain' r) : RelSeries r where
length := x.length - 1
toFun i := x[Fin.cast (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x_ne_nil) i]
step i := List.chain'_iff_get.mp hx i i.2
/-- Relation series of `r` and nonempty list of `α` satisfying `r`-chain condition bijectively
corresponds to each other. -/
protected def Equiv : RelSeries r ≃ {x : List α | x ≠ [] ∧ x.Chain' r} where
toFun x := ⟨_, x.toList_ne_nil, x.toList_chain'⟩
invFun x := fromListChain' _ x.2.1 x.2.2
left_inv x := ext (by simp [toList]) <| by ext; dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn
right_inv x := by
refine Subtype.ext (List.ext_get ?_ fun n hn1 _ => by dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn)
have := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x.2.1
simp_all [toList]
lemma toList_injective : Function.Injective (RelSeries.toList (r := r)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (RelSeries.Equiv).injective <| Subtype.ext h
-- TODO : build a similar bijection between `RelSeries α` and `Quiver.Path`
end RelSeries
namespace Rel
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class FiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
exists_longest_relSeries : ∃ x : RelSeries r, ∀ y : RelSeries r, y.length ≤ x.length
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of arbitrary
length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class InfiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of
arbitrary length. -/
exists_relSeries_with_length : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ x : RelSeries r, x.length = n
end Rel
namespace RelSeries
/-- The longest relational series when a relation is finite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] : RelSeries r :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose
lemma length_le_length_longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] (x : RelSeries r) :
x.length ≤ (RelSeries.longestOf r).length :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose_spec _
/-- A relation series with length `n` if the relation is infinite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) : RelSeries r :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose
@[simp] lemma length_withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) :
(RelSeries.withLength r n).length = n :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose_spec
section
variable {r} {s : RelSeries r} {x : α}
/-- If a relation on `α` is infinite dimensional, then `α` is nonempty. -/
lemma nonempty_of_infiniteDimensional [r.InfiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α :=
⟨RelSeries.withLength r 0 0⟩
lemma nonempty_of_finiteDimensional [r.FiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α := by
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := (Rel.finiteDimensional_iff r).mp ‹_›
exact ⟨p 0⟩
instance membership : Membership α (RelSeries r) :=
⟨Function.swap (· ∈ Set.range ·)⟩
theorem mem_def : x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ Set.range s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_toList : x ∈ s.toList ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [RelSeries.toList, List.mem_ofFn', RelSeries.mem_def]
theorem subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero (hs : s.length = 0) : {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩ - ⟨j, rfl⟩
congr!
exact finCongr (by rw [hs, zero_add]) |>.injective <| Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) _ _
theorem length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : s.length ≠ 0 :=
fun hs ↦ h.not_subsingleton <| subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs
theorem length_pos_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial h
theorem length_ne_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length ≠ 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨s 0, by simp [mem_def], s 1, by simp [mem_def], fun rid ↦ irrefl (s 0) ?_⟩,
length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial⟩
nth_rw 2 [rid]
convert s.step ⟨0, by omega⟩
ext
simpa [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem length_pos (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : 0 < s.length ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| length_ne_zero irrefl
lemma length_eq_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length = 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_ne_iff, length_ne_zero irrefl, Set.not_nontrivial_iff]
/-- Start of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its head is `a₀`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def head (x : RelSeries r) : α := x 0
/-- End of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its last element is `aₙ`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def last (x : RelSeries r) : α := x <| Fin.last _
lemma apply_last (x : RelSeries r) : x (Fin.last <| x.length) = x.last := rfl
lemma head_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.head ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
lemma last_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.last ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma head_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).head = x := by simp [singleton, head]
@[simp]
lemma last_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).last = x := by simp [singleton, last]
end
variable {r s}
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and `b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ` are two strict series
such that `r aₙ b₀`, then there is a chain of length `n + m + 1` given by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ`.
-/
@[simps length]
def append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + q.length + 1
toFun := Fin.append p q ∘ Fin.cast (by omega)
step i := by
obtain hi | rfl | hi :=
lt_trichotomy i (Fin.castLE (by omega) (Fin.last _ : Fin (p.length + 1)))
· convert p.step ⟨i.1, hi⟩ <;> convert Fin.append_left p q _ <;> rfl
· convert connect
· convert Fin.append_left p q _
· convert Fin.append_right p q _; rfl
· set x := _; set y := _
change r (Fin.append p q x) (Fin.append p q y)
have hx : x = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <|
i.2.trans <| by omega⟩ := by
ext; dsimp [x, y]; rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel']; exact hi
have hy : y = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - p.length, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (le_of_lt hi)
(by exact i.2)⟩ := by
ext
dsimp
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm p.length 1, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel' <| le_of_lt (show p.length < i.1 from hi), add_comm]
rfl
rw [hx, Fin.append_right, hy, Fin.append_right]
convert q.step ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <| by omega⟩
rw [Fin.succ_mk, Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_of_lt hi : p.length ≤ i),
Nat.add_assoc _ 1, add_comm 1, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
exact hi
lemma append_apply_left (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect ((i.castAdd (q.length + 1)).cast (by dsimp; omega)) = p i := by
delta append
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_left _ _ _
lemma append_apply_right (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (q.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect (i.natAdd p.length + 1) = q i := by
delta append
simp only [Fin.coe_natAdd, Nat.cast_add, Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_right _ _ _
ext
simp only [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_natAdd]
conv_rhs => rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, ← add_assoc]
change _ % _ = _
simp only [Nat.add_mod_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_succ_eq_iff_lt]
omega
@[simp] lemma head_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).head = p.head :=
append_apply_left p q connect 0
@[simp] lemma last_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).last = q.last := by
delta last
convert append_apply_right p q connect (Fin.last _)
ext
change _ = _ % _
simp only [append_length, Fin.val_last, Fin.natAdd_last, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod,
Nat.mod_succ]
/--
For two types `α, β` and relation on them `r, s`, if `f : α → β` preserves relation `r`, then an
`r`-series can be pushed out to an `s`-series by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ ↦ f a₀ -s→ f a₁ -s→ ... -s→ f aₙ`
-/
@[simps length]
def map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : RelSeries s where
length := p.length
toFun := f.1.comp p
step := (f.2 <| p.step ·)
@[simp] lemma map_apply (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.map f i = f (p i) := rfl
@[simp] lemma head_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).head = f p.head := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).last = f p.last := rfl
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` is an `r`-series and `a` is such that
`aᵢ -r→ a -r→ a_ᵢ₊₁`, then
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aᵢ -r→ a -r→ aᵢ₊₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`
is another `r`-series
-/
@[simps]
def insertNth (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin p.length) (a : α)
(prev_connect : r (p (Fin.castSucc i)) a) (connect_next : r a (p i.succ)) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + 1
toFun := (Fin.castSucc i.succ).insertNth a p
step m := by
set x := _; set y := _; change r x y
obtain hm | hm | hm := lt_trichotomy m.1 i.1
· convert p.step ⟨m, hm.trans i.2⟩
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· change m.1 + 1 < i.1 + 1; rwa [add_lt_add_iff_right]
simp; rfl
· rw [show x = p m from show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _ by
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· show m.1 < i.1 + 1; exact hm ▸ lt_add_one _
simp]
convert prev_connect
· ext; exact hm
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.succ = i.succ.castSucc by ext; change _ + 1 = _ + 1; rw [hm],
Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
obtain hm | hm := hm
· convert p.step ⟨m.1 - 1, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add (by omega) m.2⟩
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above (h := hm)]
aesop
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp only [Fin.val_succ, Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant, Fin.succ_mk]
congr
exact Fin.ext <| Eq.symm <| Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_trans (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) hm)
· convert connect_next
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.castSucc = i.succ.castSucc from Fin.ext hm.symm, Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· change i.1 + 1 < m.1 + 1; omega
simp only [Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant]
congr; ext; exact hm.symm
/--
A relation series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` of `r` gives a relation series of the reverse of `r`
by reversing the series `aₙ ←r- aₙ₋₁ ←r- ... ←r- a₁ ←r- a₀`.
-/
@[simps length]
def reverse (p : RelSeries r) : RelSeries (fun (a b : α) ↦ r b a) where
length := p.length
toFun := p ∘ Fin.rev
step i := by
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply]
have hi : i.1 + 1 ≤ p.length := by omega
convert p.step ⟨p.length - (i.1 + 1), Nat.sub_lt_self (by omega) hi⟩
· ext; simp
· ext
simp only [Fin.val_rev, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_succ]
omega
@[simp] lemma reverse_apply (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.reverse i = p i.rev := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.last = p.head := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma head_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.head = p.last := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma reverse_reverse {r : Rel α α} (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
ext <;> simp
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `a₀ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a -r→ a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) : RelSeries r :=
(singleton r newHead).append p rel
@[simp] lemma head_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).head = newHead := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).last = p.last := by
delta cons
rw [last_append]
lemma cons_cast_succ (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r a s.head) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
| (s.cons a h) (.cast (by simp) (.succ i)) = s i := by
dsimp [cons]
convert append_apply_right (singleton r a) s h i
ext
show i.1 + 1 = _ % _
simpa using (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by simp)).symm
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `aₙ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ a`.
-/
@[simps! length]
| Mathlib/Order/RelSeries.lean | 427 | 438 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.hasProd_iff := IsInducing.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.map_tprod [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] (hf : Multipliable f)
{G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
g (∏' i, f i) = ∏' i, g (f i) := (HasProd.tprod_eq (HasProd.map hf.hasProd g hg)).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma Topology.IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[T2Space γ] {G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable (g ∘ f) ∧ ∏' i, g (f i) ∈ Set.range g := by
constructor
· intro hf
constructor
· exact hf.map g hg.continuous
· use ∏' i, f i
exact hf.map_tprod g hg.continuous
· rintro ⟨hgf, a, ha⟩
use a
have := hgf.hasProd
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← ha] at this
exact (hg.hasProd_iff f a).mp this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range :=
IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range
/-- "A special case of `Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience" -/
@[to_additive "A special case of `Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience"]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_equiv [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[EquivLike G α γ] [MulEquivClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g)
(hg' : Continuous (EquivLike.inv g : γ → α)) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse g (g : α ≃* γ).symm hg hg' (EquivLike.left_inv g)
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Surjective.multipliable_iff_of_hasProd_iff {α' : Type*} [CommMonoid α']
[TopologicalSpace α'] {e : α' → α} (hes : Function.Surjective e) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, HasProd f (e a) ↔ HasProd g a) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
hes.exists.trans <| exists_congr <| @he
variable [ContinuousMul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul (hf : HasProd f a) (hg : HasProd g b) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b * g b) (a * b) := by
dsimp only [HasProd] at hf hg ⊢
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib]
exact hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b * g b :=
(hf.hasProd.mul hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : Finset γ} :
(∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f i) (a i)) → HasProd (fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [hasProd_one, prod_empty, forall_true_iff]) <| by
simp +contextual only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_iff,
prod_insert, and_imp]
exact fun x s _ IH hx h ↦ hx.mul (IH h)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_prod {f : γ → β → α} {s : Finset γ} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Multipliable (f i)) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b :=
(hasProd_prod fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_disjoint {s t : Set β} (hs : Disjoint s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (s ∪ t : Set β) → α) (a * b) := by
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Set.mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint hs]
exact ha.mul hb
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod_disjoint {ι} (s : Finset ι) {t : ι → Set β} {a : ι → α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t i → α) (a i)) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) → α) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
simp_rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion _ _ hs]
exact hasProd_prod hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_isCompl {s t : Set β} (hs : IsCompl s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) := by
simpa [← hs.compl_eq] using
(hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 ha).mul (hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 hb)
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_compl {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul_compl {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.mul_compl hsc.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.compl_mul {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl.symm hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.compl_add {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.compl_mul hsc.hasProd).multipliable
/-- Version of `HasProd.update` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`,
it gives a relationship between the products of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `HasSum.update` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist."]
theorem HasProd.update' {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a a' : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (x : α)
(hf' : HasProd (update f b x) a') : a * x = a' * f b := by
have : ∀ b', f b' * ite (b' = b) x 1 = update f b x b' * ite (b' = b) (f b) 1 := by
intro b'
split_ifs with hb'
· simpa only [Function.update_apply, hb', eq_self_iff_true] using mul_comm (f b) x
· simp only [Function.update_apply, hb', if_false]
have h := hf.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b x)
simp_rw [this] at h
exact HasProd.unique h (hf'.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b (f b)))
/-- Version of `hasProd_ite_div_hasProd` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`, it gives
a relationship between the products of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist."]
theorem eq_mul_of_hasProd_ite {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (a' : α)
(hf' : HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) a') : a = a' * f b := by
refine (mul_one a).symm.trans (hf.update' b 1 ?_)
convert hf'
apply update_apply
end HasProd
section tprod
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_set_coe (f : β → α) {s t : Set β} (h : s = t) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x : t, f x := by rw [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_subtype (f : β → α) {P Q : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) :
∏' x : {x // P x}, f x = ∏' x : {x // Q x}, f x :=
tprod_congr_set_coe f <| Set.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_finprod (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ᶠ b, f b := by simp [tprod_def, multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport hf, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod' {s : Finset β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_finprod (s.finite_toSet.subset hf), finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod {s : Finset β} (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b :=
tprod_eq_prod' <| mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_one : ∏' _ : β, (1 : α) = 1 := by rw [tprod_eq_finprod] <;> simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_empty [IsEmpty β] : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := (∅ : Finset β))] <;> simp
@[to_additive]
| theorem tprod_congr {f g : β → α}
(hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∏' b, f b = ∏' b, g b :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 391 | 392 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Grade
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Intervals of finsets as finsets
This file provides the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for `Finset α` and calculates the cardinality
of finite intervals of finsets.
If `s t : Finset α`, then `Finset.Icc s t` is the finset of finsets which include `s` and are
included in `t`. For example,
`Finset.Icc {0, 1} {0, 1, 2, 3} = {{0, 1}, {0, 1, 2}, {0, 1, 3}, {0, 1, 2, 3}}`
and
`Finset.Icc {0, 1, 2} {0, 1, 3} = {}`.
In addition, this file gives characterizations of monotone and strictly monotone functions
out of `Finset α` in terms of `Finset.insert`
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Finset α) where
finsetIcc s t := {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊆ u}
finsetIco s t := {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊆ u}
finsetIoc s t := {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊂ u}
finsetIoo s t := {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊂ u}
finset_mem_Icc s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_powerset]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ico s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_ssubsets]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ioc s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_powerset]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ioo s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_ssubsets]
exact and_comm
theorem Icc_eq_filter_powerset : Icc s t = {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊆ u} :=
rfl
theorem Ico_eq_filter_ssubsets : Ico s t = {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊆ u} :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_eq_filter_powerset : Ioc s t = {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊂ u} :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_eq_filter_ssubsets : Ioo s t = {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊂ u} :=
rfl
theorem Iic_eq_powerset : Iic s = s.powerset :=
filter_true_of_mem fun t _ => empty_subset t
theorem Iio_eq_ssubsets : Iio s = s.ssubsets :=
filter_true_of_mem fun t _ => empty_subset t
variable {s t}
theorem Icc_eq_image_powerset (h : s ⊆ t) : Icc s t = (t \ s).powerset.image (s ∪ ·) := by
ext u
simp_rw [mem_Icc, mem_image, mem_powerset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
exact ⟨u \ s, sdiff_le_sdiff_right ht, sup_sdiff_cancel_right hs⟩
· rintro ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact ⟨le_sup_left, union_subset h <| hv.trans sdiff_subset⟩
theorem Ico_eq_image_ssubsets (h : s ⊆ t) : Ico s t = (t \ s).ssubsets.image (s ∪ ·) := by
ext u
simp_rw [mem_Ico, mem_image, mem_ssubsets]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
exact ⟨u \ s, sdiff_lt_sdiff_right ht hs, sup_sdiff_cancel_right hs⟩
· rintro ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact ⟨le_sup_left, sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left hv h⟩
/-- Cardinality of a non-empty `Icc` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Icc_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Icc s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) := by
rw [← card_sdiff h, ← card_powerset, Icc_eq_image_powerset h, Finset.card_image_iff]
rintro u hu v hv (huv : s ⊔ u = s ⊔ v)
rw [mem_coe, mem_powerset] at hu hv
rw [← (disjoint_sdiff.mono_right hu : Disjoint s u).sup_sdiff_cancel_left, ←
(disjoint_sdiff.mono_right hv : Disjoint s v).sup_sdiff_cancel_left, huv]
/-- Cardinality of an `Ico` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Ico_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ico s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 1 := by
rw [card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc_finset h]
/-- Cardinality of an `Ioc` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Ioc_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ioc s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 1 := by
rw [card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc_finset h]
/-- Cardinality of an `Ioo` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Ioo_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ioo s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two, card_Icc_finset h]
|
/-- Cardinality of an `Iic` of finsets. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Interval.lean | 110 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Dimension of modules and vector spaces
## Main definitions
* The rank of a module is defined as `Module.rank : Cardinal`.
This is defined as the supremum of the cardinalities of linearly independent subsets.
## Main statements
* `LinearMap.rank_le_of_injective`: the source of an injective linear map has dimension
at most that of the target.
* `LinearMap.rank_le_of_surjective`: the target of a surjective linear map has dimension
at most that of that source.
## Implementation notes
Many theorems in this file are not universe-generic when they relate dimensions
in different universes. They should be as general as they can be without
inserting `lift`s. The types `M`, `M'`, ... all live in different universes,
and `M₁`, `M₂`, ... all live in the same universe.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' u u' v v'
variable {R : Type u} {R' : Type u'} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'}
open Cardinal Submodule Function Set
section Module
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (R M)
/-- The rank of a module, defined as a term of type `Cardinal`.
We define this as the supremum of the cardinalities of linearly independent subsets.
The supremum may not be attained, see https://mathoverflow.net/a/263053.
For a free module over any ring satisfying the strong rank condition
(e.g. left-noetherian rings, commutative rings, and in particular division rings and fields),
this is the same as the dimension of the space (i.e. the cardinality of any basis).
In particular this agrees with the usual notion of the dimension of a vector space.
See also `Module.finrank` for a `ℕ`-valued function which returns the correct value
for a finite-dimensional vector space (but 0 for an infinite-dimensional vector space).
-/
@[stacks 09G3 "first part"]
protected irreducible_def Module.rank : Cardinal :=
⨆ ι : { s : Set M // LinearIndepOn R id s }, (#ι.1)
theorem rank_le_card : Module.rank R M ≤ #M :=
(Module.rank_def _ _).trans_le (ciSup_le' fun _ ↦ mk_set_le _)
lemma nonempty_linearIndependent_set : Nonempty {s : Set M // LinearIndepOn R id s } :=
⟨⟨∅, linearIndepOn_empty _ _⟩⟩
end
namespace LinearIndependent
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [Nontrivial R]
theorem cardinal_lift_le_rank {ι : Type w} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [Module.rank]
refine le_trans ?_ (lift_le.mpr <| le_ciSup (bddAbove_range _) ⟨_, hv.linearIndepOn_id⟩)
exact lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective _ hv.injective).toEmbedding⟩
lemma aleph0_le_rank {ι : Type w} [Infinite ι] {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : ℵ₀ ≤ Module.rank R M :=
aleph0_le_lift.mp <| (aleph0_le_lift.mpr <| aleph0_le_mk ι).trans hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
theorem cardinal_le_rank {ι : Type v} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : #ι ≤ Module.rank R M := by
simpa using hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
theorem cardinal_le_rank' {s : Set M}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M)) : #s ≤ Module.rank R M :=
hs.cardinal_le_rank
theorem _root_.LinearIndepOn.encard_le_toENat_rank {ι : Type*} {v : ι → M} {s : Set ι}
(hs : LinearIndepOn R v s) : s.encard ≤ (Module.rank R M).toENat := by
simpa using OrderHom.mono (β := ℕ∞) Cardinal.toENat hs.linearIndependent.cardinal_lift_le_rank
end LinearIndependent
section SurjectiveInjective
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Semiring R']
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R' → R` is an injective map
non-zero elements, `j : M →+ M'` is an injective monoid homomorphism, such that the scalar
multiplications on `M` and `M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to
the rank of `M' / R'`. As a special case, taking `R = R'` it is
`LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective`. -/
theorem lift_rank_le_of_injective_injectiveₛ (i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M')
(hi : Injective i) (hj : Injective j)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) ≤ lift.{v} (Module.rank R' M') := by
| simp_rw [Module.rank, lift_iSup (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range _) fun ⟨s, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨j '' s,
LinearIndepOn.id_image (h.linearIndependent.map_of_injective_injectiveₛ i j hi hj hc)⟩,
lift_mk_le'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.image j s hj).toEmbedding⟩⟩
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R → R'` is a surjective map, and
`j : M →+ M'` is an injective monoid homomorphism, such that the scalar multiplications on `M` and
`M'` are compatible, then the rank of `M / R` is smaller than or equal to the rank of `M' / R'`.
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Basic.lean | 122 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
/-!
# Quotient category
Constructs the quotient of a category by an arbitrary family of relations on its hom-sets,
by introducing a type synonym for the objects, and identifying homs as necessary.
This is analogous to 'the quotient of a group by the normal closure of a subset', rather
than 'the quotient of a group by a normal subgroup'. When taking the quotient by a congruence
relation, `functor_map_eq_iff` says that no unnecessary identifications have been made.
-/
/-- A `HomRel` on `C` consists of a relation on every hom-set. -/
def HomRel (C) [Quiver C] :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄, (X ⟶ Y) → (X ⟶ Y) → Prop
-- The `Inhabited` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance (C) [Quiver C] : Inhabited (HomRel C) where
default := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ PUnit
namespace CategoryTheory
section
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A functor induces a `HomRel` on its domain, relating those maps that have the same image. -/
def Functor.homRel : HomRel C :=
fun _ _ f g ↦ F.map f = F.map g
@[simp]
lemma Functor.homRel_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
F.homRel f g ↔ F.map f = F.map g := Iff.rfl
end
variable {C : Type _} [Category C] (r : HomRel C)
/-- A `HomRel` is a congruence when it's an equivalence on every hom-set, and it can be composed
from left and right. -/
class Congruence : Prop where
/-- `r` is an equivalence on every hom-set. -/
equivalence : ∀ {X Y}, _root_.Equivalence (@r X Y)
/-- Precomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compLeft : ∀ {X Y Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g g' : Y ⟶ Z}, r g g' → r (f ≫ g) (f ≫ g')
/-- Postcomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compRight : ∀ {X Y Z} {f f' : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z), r f f' → r (f ≫ g) (f' ≫ g)
/-- For `F : C ⥤ D`, `F.homRel` is a congruence. -/
instance Functor.congruence_homRel {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D) :
Congruence F.homRel where
equivalence :=
{ refl := fun _ ↦ rfl
symm := by aesop
trans := by aesop }
compLeft := by aesop
compRight := by aesop
/-- A type synonym for `C`, thought of as the objects of the quotient category. -/
@[ext]
structure Quotient (r : HomRel C) where
/-- The object of `C`. -/
as : C
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Quotient r) :=
⟨{ as := default }⟩
namespace Quotient
/-- Generates the closure of a family of relations w.r.t. composition from left and right. -/
inductive CompClosure (r : HomRel C) ⦃s t : C⦄ : (s ⟶ t) → (s ⟶ t) → Prop
| intro {a b : C} (f : s ⟶ a) (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ t) (h : r m₁ m₂) :
CompClosure r (f ≫ m₁ ≫ g) (f ≫ m₂ ≫ g)
theorem CompClosure.of {a b : C} (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (h : r m₁ m₂) : CompClosure r m₁ m₂ := by
simpa using CompClosure.intro (𝟙 _) m₁ m₂ (𝟙 _) h
theorem comp_left {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
∀ (g₁ g₂ : b ⟶ c) (_ : CompClosure r g₁ g₂), CompClosure r (f ≫ g₁) (f ≫ g₂)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro (f ≫ x) m₁ m₂ y h
theorem comp_right {a b c : C} (g : b ⟶ c) :
∀ (f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b) (_ : CompClosure r f₁ f₂), CompClosure r (f₁ ≫ g) (f₂ ≫ g)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro x m₁ m₂ (y ≫ g) h
/-- Hom-sets of the quotient category. -/
def Hom (s t : Quotient r) :=
Quot <| @CompClosure C _ r s.as t.as
instance (a : Quotient r) : Inhabited (Hom r a a) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)⟩
/-- Composition in the quotient category. -/
def comp ⦃a b c : Quotient r⦄ : Hom r a b → Hom r b c → Hom r a c := fun hf hg ↦
Quot.liftOn hf
(fun f ↦
Quot.liftOn hg (fun g ↦ Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g)) fun g₁ g₂ h ↦
Quot.sound <| comp_left r f g₁ g₂ h)
fun f₁ f₂ h ↦ Quot.inductionOn hg fun g ↦ Quot.sound <| comp_right r g f₁ f₂ h
@[simp]
theorem comp_mk {a b c : Quotient r} (f : a.as ⟶ b.as) (g : b.as ⟶ c.as) :
comp r (Quot.mk _ f) (Quot.mk _ g) = Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
-- Porting note: Had to manually add the proofs of `comp_id` `id_comp` and `assoc`
instance category : Category (Quotient r) where
Hom := Hom r
id a := Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)
comp := @comp _ _ r
comp_id f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
id_comp f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
assoc f g h := Quot.inductionOn f <| Quot.inductionOn g <| Quot.inductionOn h <| by simp
/-- The functor from a category to its quotient. -/
def functor : C ⥤ Quotient r where
obj a := { as := a }
map := @fun _ _ f ↦ Quot.mk _ f
instance full_functor : (functor r).Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨Quot.out f, by simp [functor]⟩
instance essSurj_functor : (functor r).EssSurj where
mem_essImage Y :=
| ⟨Y.as, ⟨eqToIso (by
ext
rfl)⟩⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Quotient.lean | 134 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Morenikeji Neri
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Nonunits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.UniqueFactorizationDomain
/-!
# Principal ideal rings, principal ideal domains, and Bézout rings
A principal ideal ring (PIR) is a ring in which all left ideals are principal. A
principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain which is a principal ideal ring.
The definition of `IsPrincipalIdealRing` can be found in `Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span`.
# Main definitions
Note that for principal ideal domains, one should use
`[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]`. There is no explicit definition of a PID.
Theorems about PID's are in the `PrincipalIdealRing` namespace.
- `IsBezout`: the predicate saying that every finitely generated left ideal is principal.
- `generator`: a generator of a principal ideal (or more generally submodule)
- `to_uniqueFactorizationMonoid`: a PID is a unique factorization domain
# Main results
- `Ideal.IsPrime.to_maximal_ideal`: a non-zero prime ideal in a PID is maximal.
- `EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain` : a Euclidean domain is a PID.
- `IsBezout.nonemptyGCDMonoid`: Every Bézout domain is a GCD domain.
-/
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
open Set Function
open Submodule
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
instance bot_isPrincipal : (⊥ : Submodule R M).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
instance top_isPrincipal : (⊤ : Submodule R R).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨1, Ideal.span_singleton_one.symm⟩⟩
variable (R)
/-- A Bézout ring is a ring whose finitely generated ideals are principal. -/
class IsBezout : Prop where
/-- Any finitely generated ideal is principal. -/
isPrincipal_of_FG : ∀ I : Ideal R, I.FG → I.IsPrincipal
instance (priority := 100) IsBezout.of_isPrincipalIdealRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] : IsBezout R :=
⟨fun I _ => IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal I⟩
instance (priority := 100) DivisionRing.isPrincipalIdealRing (K : Type u) [DivisionRing K] :
IsPrincipalIdealRing K where
principal S := by
rcases Ideal.eq_bot_or_top S with (rfl | rfl)
· apply bot_isPrincipal
· apply top_isPrincipal
end
namespace Submodule.IsPrincipal
variable [AddCommMonoid M]
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Module R M]
/-- `generator I`, if `I` is a principal submodule, is an `x ∈ M` such that `span R {x} = I` -/
noncomputable def generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : M :=
Classical.choose (principal S)
theorem span_singleton_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : span R {generator S} = S :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal S))
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_generator (I : Ideal R) [I.IsPrincipal] :
Ideal.span ({generator I} : Set R) = I :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal I))
@[simp]
theorem generator_mem (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : generator S ∈ S := by
have : generator S ∈ span R {generator S} := subset_span (mem_singleton _)
convert this
exact span_singleton_generator S |>.symm
theorem mem_iff_eq_smul_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : M} :
x ∈ S ↔ ∃ s : R, x = s • generator S := by
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ x, ← mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_generator]
theorem eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
S = ⊥ ↔ generator S = 0 := by rw [← @span_singleton_eq_bot R M, span_singleton_generator]
protected lemma fg {S : Submodule R M} (h : S.IsPrincipal) : S.FG :=
⟨{h.generator}, by simp only [Finset.coe_singleton, span_singleton_generator]⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.PrincipalIdealRing.isNoetherianRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing R where
noetherian S := (IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal S).fg
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.IsPrincipalIdealRing.of_isNoetherianRing_of_isBezout
[IsNoetherianRing R] [IsBezout R] : IsPrincipalIdealRing R where
principal S := IsBezout.isPrincipal_of_FG S (IsNoetherian.noetherian S)
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [Module R M]
theorem associated_generator_span_self [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [IsDomain R] (r : R) :
Associated (generator <| Ideal.span {r}) r := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton]
exact Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
theorem mem_iff_generator_dvd (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : R} : x ∈ S ↔ generator S ∣ x :=
(mem_iff_eq_smul_generator S).trans (exists_congr fun a => by simp only [mul_comm, smul_eq_mul])
theorem prime_generator_of_isPrime (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] [is_prime : S.IsPrime]
(ne_bot : S ≠ ⊥) : Prime (generator S) :=
⟨fun h => ne_bot ((eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero S).2 h), fun h =>
is_prime.ne_top (S.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem (generator_mem S) h), fun _ _ => by
simpa only [← mem_iff_generator_dvd S] using is_prime.2⟩
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_map_dvd_of_mem {N : Submodule R M} (ϕ : M →ₗ[R] R) [(N.map ϕ).IsPrincipal] {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ N) : generator (N.map ϕ) ∣ ϕ x := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, Submodule.mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_submoduleImage_dvd_of_mem {N O : Submodule R M} (hNO : N ≤ O) (ϕ : O →ₗ[R] R)
[(ϕ.submoduleImage N).IsPrincipal] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ N) :
generator (ϕ.submoduleImage N) ∣ ϕ ⟨x, hNO hx⟩ := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, LinearMap.mem_submoduleImage_of_le hNO]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
end CommRing
end Submodule.IsPrincipal
namespace IsBezout
section
variable [Ring R]
instance span_pair_isPrincipal [IsBezout R] (x y : R) : (Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal := by
classical exact isPrincipal_of_FG (Ideal.span {x, y}) ⟨{x, y}, by simp⟩
variable (x y : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
/-- A choice of gcd of two elements in a Bézout domain.
Note that the choice is usually not unique. -/
noncomputable def gcd : R := Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator (Ideal.span {x, y})
theorem span_gcd : Ideal.span {gcd x y} = Ideal.span {x, y} :=
Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
end
variable [CommRing R] (x y z : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
theorem gcd_dvd_left : gcd x y ∣ x :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
theorem gcd_dvd_right : gcd x y ∣ y :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
variable {x y z} in
theorem dvd_gcd (hx : z ∣ x) (hy : z ∣ y) : z ∣ gcd x y := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton] at hx hy ⊢
rw [span_gcd, Ideal.span_insert, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem gcd_eq_sum : ∃ a b : R, a * x + b * y = gcd x y :=
Ideal.mem_span_pair.mp (by rw [← span_gcd]; apply Ideal.subset_span; simp)
variable {x y}
| theorem _root_.IsRelPrime.isCoprime (h : IsRelPrime x y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [← Ideal.isCoprime_span_singleton_iff, Ideal.isCoprime_iff_sup_eq, ← Ideal.span_union,
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PrincipalIdealDomain.lean | 200 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
| theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 395 | 396 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.GaussianIntegral
/-! # Convexity properties of the Gamma function
In this file, we prove that `Gamma` and `log ∘ Gamma` are convex functions on the positive real
line. We then prove the Bohr-Mollerup theorem, which characterises `Gamma` as the *unique*
positive-real-valued, log-convex function on the positive reals satisfying `f (x + 1) = x f x` and
`f 1 = 1`.
The proof of the Bohr-Mollerup theorem is bound up with the proof of (a weak form of) the Euler
limit formula, `Real.BohrMollerup.tendsto_logGammaSeq`, stating that for positive
real `x` the sequence `x * log n + log n! - ∑ (m : ℕ) ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + m)`
tends to `log Γ(x)` as `n → ∞`. We prove that any function satisfying the hypotheses of the
Bohr-Mollerup theorem must agree with the limit in the Euler limit formula, so there is at most one
such function; then we show that `Γ` satisfies these conditions.
Since most of the auxiliary lemmas for the Bohr-Mollerup theorem are of no relevance outside the
context of this proof, we place them in a separate namespace `Real.BohrMollerup` to avoid clutter.
(This includes the logarithmic form of the Euler limit formula, since later we will prove a more
general form of the Euler limit formula valid for any real or complex `x`; see
`Real.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma` and `Complex.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma` in the file
`Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean`.)
As an application of the Bohr-Mollerup theorem we prove the Legendre doubling formula for the
Gamma function for real positive `s` (which will be upgraded to a proof for all complex `s` in a
later file).
TODO: This argument can be extended to prove the general `k`-multiplication formula (at least up
to a constant, and it should be possible to deduce the value of this constant using Stirling's
formula).
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Set MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat ENNReal Topology Real
namespace Real
section Convexity
/-- Log-convexity of the Gamma function on the positive reals (stated in multiplicative form),
proved using the Hölder inequality applied to Euler's integral. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_add_mul_le_rpow_Gamma_mul_rpow_Gamma {s t a b : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
Gamma (a * s + b * t) ≤ Gamma s ^ a * Gamma t ^ b := by
-- We will apply Hölder's inequality, for the conjugate exponents `p = 1 / a`
-- and `q = 1 / b`, to the functions `f a s` and `f b t`, where `f` is as follows:
let f : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ → ℝ := fun c u x => exp (-c * x) * x ^ (c * (u - 1))
have e : HolderConjugate (1 / a) (1 / b) := Real.holderConjugate_one_div ha hb hab
have hab' : b = 1 - a := by linarith
have hst : 0 < a * s + b * t := by positivity
-- some properties of f:
have posf : ∀ c u x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioi (0 : ℝ) → 0 ≤ f c u x := fun c u x hx =>
mul_nonneg (exp_pos _).le (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).le
have posf' : ∀ c u : ℝ, ∀ᵐ x : ℝ ∂volume.restrict (Ioi 0), 0 ≤ f c u x := fun c u =>
(ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ (posf c u))
have fpow :
∀ {c x : ℝ} (_ : 0 < c) (u : ℝ) (_ : 0 < x), exp (-x) * x ^ (u - 1) = f c u x ^ (1 / c) := by
intro c x hc u hx
dsimp only [f]
rw [mul_rpow (exp_pos _).le ((rpow_nonneg hx.le) _), ← exp_mul, ← rpow_mul hx.le]
congr 2 <;> field_simp [hc.ne']; ring
-- show `f c u` is in `ℒp` for `p = 1/c`:
have f_mem_Lp :
∀ {c u : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hu : 0 < u),
MemLp (f c u) (ENNReal.ofReal (1 / c)) (volume.restrict (Ioi 0)) := by
intro c u hc hu
have A : ENNReal.ofReal (1 / c) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, one_div_pos]
have B : ENNReal.ofReal (1 / c) ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
rw [← memLp_norm_rpow_iff _ A B, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (one_div_nonneg.mpr hc.le),
ENNReal.div_self A B, memLp_one_iff_integrable]
· apply Integrable.congr (GammaIntegral_convergent hu)
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [fpow hc u hx]
congr 1
exact (norm_of_nonneg (posf _ _ x hx)).symm
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
refine (Continuous.continuousOn ?_).mul (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx => ?_)
· exact continuous_exp.comp (continuous_const.mul continuous_id')
· exact continuousAt_rpow_const _ _ (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')
-- now apply Hölder:
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs, Gamma_eq_integral ht, Gamma_eq_integral hst]
convert
MeasureTheory.integral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_nonneg e (posf' a s) (posf' b t) (f_mem_Lp ha hs)
(f_mem_Lp hb ht) using
1
· refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
have A : exp (-x) = exp (-a * x) * exp (-b * x) := by
rw [← exp_add, ← add_mul, ← neg_add, hab, neg_one_mul]
have B : x ^ (a * s + b * t - 1) = x ^ (a * (s - 1)) * x ^ (b * (t - 1)) := by
rw [← rpow_add hx, hab']; congr 1; ring
rw [A, B]
ring
· rw [one_div_one_div, one_div_one_div]
congr 2 <;> exact setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => fpow (by assumption) _ hx
theorem convexOn_log_Gamma : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) (log ∘ Gamma) := by
refine convexOn_iff_forall_pos.mpr ⟨convex_Ioi _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
have : b = 1 - a := by linarith
subst this
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, smul_eq_mul]
simp only [mem_Ioi] at hx hy
rw [← log_rpow, ← log_rpow, ← log_mul]
· gcongr
exact Gamma_mul_add_mul_le_rpow_Gamma_mul_rpow_Gamma hx hy ha hb hab
all_goals positivity
theorem convexOn_Gamma : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) Gamma := by
refine
((convexOn_exp.subset (subset_univ _) ?_).comp convexOn_log_Gamma
(exp_monotone.monotoneOn _)).congr
fun x hx => exp_log (Gamma_pos_of_pos hx)
rw [convex_iff_isPreconnected]
refine isPreconnected_Ioi.image _ fun x hx => ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt ?_
refine (differentiableAt_Gamma fun m => ?_).continuousAt.log (Gamma_pos_of_pos hx).ne'
exact (neg_lt_iff_pos_add.mpr (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mem_Ioi.mp hx) (Nat.cast_nonneg m))).ne'
end Convexity
section BohrMollerup
namespace BohrMollerup
/-- The function `n ↦ x log n + log n! - (log x + ... + log (x + n))`, which we will show tends to
`log (Gamma x)` as `n → ∞`. -/
def logGammaSeq (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
x * log n + log n ! - ∑ m ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + m)
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem f_nat_eq (hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = f 1 + log (n - 1)! := by
refine Nat.le_induction (by simp) (fun m hm IH => ?_) n (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)
have A : 0 < (m : ℝ) := Nat.cast_pos.2 hm
simp only [hf_feq A, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero]
rw [IH, add_assoc, ← log_mul (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)) A.ne', ←
Nat.cast_mul]
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hm, Nat.factorial_succ, mul_comm]
congr
exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hm).symm
theorem f_add_nat_eq (hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (n : ℕ) :
f (x + n) = f x + ∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, log (x + m) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
have : x + n.succ = x + n + 1 := by push_cast; ring
rw [this, hf_feq, hn]
· rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.sum_insert Finset.not_mem_range_self]
abel
· linarith [(Nat.cast_nonneg n : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ))]
/-- Linear upper bound for `f (x + n)` on unit interval -/
theorem f_add_nat_le (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) :
f (n + x) ≤ f n + x * log n := by
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
have : f n + x * log n = (1 - x) * f n + x * f (n + 1) := by rw [hf_feq hn']; ring
rw [this, (by ring : (n : ℝ) + x = (1 - x) * n + x * (n + 1))]
simpa only [smul_eq_mul] using
hf_conv.2 hn' (by linarith : 0 < (n + 1 : ℝ)) (by linarith : 0 ≤ 1 - x) hx.le (by linarith)
/-- Linear lower bound for `f (x + n)` on unit interval -/
theorem f_add_nat_ge (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hn : 2 ≤ n) (hx : 0 < x) :
f n + x * log (n - 1) ≤ f (n + x) := by
have npos : 0 < (n : ℝ) - 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, sub_pos, Nat.cast_lt]; omega
have c :=
(convexOn_iff_slope_mono_adjacent.mp <| hf_conv).2 npos (by linarith : 0 < (n : ℝ) + x)
(by linarith : (n : ℝ) - 1 < (n : ℝ)) (by linarith)
rw [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_sub_cancel, div_one] at c
have : f (↑n - 1) = f n - log (↑n - 1) := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← hf_feq npos, sub_add_cancel]
rwa [this, le_div_iff₀ hx, sub_sub_cancel, le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm _ x, add_comm] at c
theorem logGammaSeq_add_one (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
logGammaSeq (x + 1) n = logGammaSeq x (n + 1) + log x - (x + 1) * (log (n + 1) - log n) := by
dsimp only [Nat.factorial_succ, logGammaSeq]
conv_rhs => rw [Finset.sum_range_succ', Nat.cast_zero, add_zero]
rw [Nat.cast_mul, log_mul]; rotate_left
· rw [Nat.cast_ne_zero]; exact Nat.succ_ne_zero n
· rw [Nat.cast_ne_zero]; exact Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
have :
∑ m ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + 1 + ↑m) =
∑ k ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), log (x + ↑(k + 1)) := by
congr! 2 with m
push_cast
abel
rw [← this, Nat.cast_add_one n]
ring
theorem le_logGammaSeq (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) :
f x ≤ f 1 + x * log (n + 1) - x * log n + logGammaSeq x n := by
rw [logGammaSeq, ← add_sub_assoc, le_sub_iff_add_le, ← f_add_nat_eq (@hf_feq) hx, add_comm x]
refine (f_add_nat_le hf_conv (@hf_feq) (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n) hx hx').trans (le_of_eq ?_)
rw [f_nat_eq @hf_feq (by omega : n + 1 ≠ 0), Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.cast_add_one]
ring
theorem ge_logGammaSeq (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f 1 + logGammaSeq x n ≤ f x := by
dsimp [logGammaSeq]
rw [← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← f_add_nat_eq (@hf_feq) hx, add_comm x _]
refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (f_add_nat_ge hf_conv @hf_feq ?_ hx)
· rw [f_nat_eq @hf_feq, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.cast_add_one, add_sub_cancel_right]
· ring
· exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
· omega
theorem tendsto_logGammaSeq_of_le_one (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) :
Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| f x - f 1) := by
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' (f := logGammaSeq x)
(g := fun n ↦ f x - f 1 - x * (log (n + 1) - log n)) ?_ tendsto_const_nhds ?_ ?_
· have : f x - f 1 = f x - f 1 - x * 0 := by ring
nth_rw 2 [this]
exact Tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds (tendsto_log_nat_add_one_sub_log.const_mul _)
· filter_upwards with n
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', sub_le_iff_le_add']
convert le_logGammaSeq hf_conv (@hf_feq) hx hx' n using 1
ring
· show ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, logGammaSeq x n ≤ f x - f 1
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with n hn using
le_sub_iff_add_le'.mpr (ge_logGammaSeq hf_conv hf_feq hx hn)
theorem tendsto_logGammaSeq (hf_conv : ConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) f)
(hf_feq : ∀ {y : ℝ}, 0 < y → f (y + 1) = f y + log y) (hx : 0 < x) :
Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| f x - f 1) := by
suffices ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m < x → x ≤ m + 1 → Tendsto (logGammaSeq x) atTop (𝓝 <| f x - f 1) by
refine this ⌈x - 1⌉₊ ?_ ?_
· rcases lt_or_le x 1 with ⟨⟩
· rwa [Nat.ceil_eq_zero.mpr (by linarith : x - 1 ≤ 0), Nat.cast_zero]
· convert Nat.ceil_lt_add_one (by linarith : 0 ≤ x - 1)
abel
· rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add]; exact Nat.le_ceil _
intro m
induction' m with m hm generalizing x
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_add]
exact fun _ hx' => tendsto_logGammaSeq_of_le_one hf_conv (@hf_feq) hx hx'
· intro hy hy'
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ← sub_le_iff_le_add] at hy'
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hy
specialize hm ((Nat.cast_nonneg _).trans_lt hy) hy hy'
-- now massage gauss_product n (x - 1) into gauss_product (n - 1) x
have :
∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop,
logGammaSeq (x - 1) n =
logGammaSeq x (n - 1) + x * (log (↑(n - 1) + 1) - log ↑(n - 1)) - log (x - 1) := by
refine Eventually.mp (eventually_ge_atTop 1) (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn => ?_)
have := logGammaSeq_add_one (x - 1) (n - 1)
rw [sub_add_cancel, Nat.sub_add_cancel hn] at this
rw [this]
ring
replace hm :=
((Tendsto.congr' this hm).add (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _ => log (x - 1)) _ _)).comp
(tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1)
have :
((fun x_1 : ℕ =>
(fun n : ℕ =>
logGammaSeq x (n - 1) + x * (log (↑(n - 1) + 1) - log ↑(n - 1)) - log (x - 1))
x_1 +
(fun b : ℕ => log (x - 1)) x_1) ∘
fun a : ℕ => a + 1) =
fun n => logGammaSeq x n + x * (log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n) := by
| ext1 n
dsimp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [sub_add_cancel, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
rw [this] at hm
convert hm.sub (tendsto_log_nat_add_one_sub_log.const_mul x) using 2
· ring
· have := hf_feq ((Nat.cast_nonneg m).trans_lt hy)
rw [sub_add_cancel] at this
rw [this]
ring
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/BohrMollerup.lean | 278 | 287 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 161 | 161 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,137 | 1,137 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.KanExtension.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Predicate
/-!
# Right derived functors
In this file, given a functor `F : C ⥤ H`, and `L : C ⥤ D` that is a
localization functor for `W : MorphismProperty C`, we define
`F.totalRightDerived L W : D ⥤ H` as the left Kan extension of `F`
along `L`: it is defined if the type class `F.HasRightDerivedFunctor W`
asserting the existence of a left Kan extension is satisfied.
(The name `totalRightDerived` is to avoid name-collision with
`Functor.rightDerived` which are the right derived functors in
the context of abelian categories.)
Given `RF : D ⥤ H` and `α : F ⟶ L ⋙ RF`, we also introduce a type class
`F.IsRightDerivedFunctor α W` saying that `α` is a left Kan extension of `F`
along the localization functor `L`.
## TODO
- refactor `Functor.rightDerived` (and `Functor.leftDerived`) when the necessary
material enters mathlib: derived categories, injective/projective derivability
structures, existence of derived functors from derivability structures.
## References
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/derived+functor
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Functor
variable {C C' D D' H H' : Type _} [Category C] [Category C']
[Category D] [Category D'] [Category H] [Category H']
(RF RF' RF'' : D ⥤ H) {F F' F'' : C ⥤ H} (e : F ≅ F') {L : C ⥤ D}
(α : F ⟶ L ⋙ RF) (α' : F' ⟶ L ⋙ RF') (α'' : F'' ⟶ L ⋙ RF'') (α'₂ : F ⟶ L ⋙ RF')
(W : MorphismProperty C)
/-- A functor `RF : D ⥤ H` is a right derived functor of `F : C ⥤ H`
if it is equipped with a natural transformation `α : F ⟶ L ⋙ RF`
which makes it a left Kan extension of `F` along `L`,
where `L : C ⥤ D` is a localization functor for `W : MorphismProperty C`. -/
class IsRightDerivedFunctor [L.IsLocalization W] : Prop where
isLeftKanExtension' : RF.IsLeftKanExtension α
lemma IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension
[L.IsLocalization W] [RF.IsRightDerivedFunctor α W] :
RF.IsLeftKanExtension α :=
IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension' W
lemma isRightDerivedFunctor_iff_isLeftKanExtension [L.IsLocalization W] :
RF.IsRightDerivedFunctor α W ↔ RF.IsLeftKanExtension α := by
constructor
· exact fun _ => IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension RF α W
· exact fun h => ⟨h⟩
variable {RF RF'} in
lemma isRightDerivedFunctor_iff_of_iso (α' : F ⟶ L ⋙ RF') (W : MorphismProperty C)
[L.IsLocalization W] (e : RF ≅ RF') (comm : α ≫ whiskerLeft L e.hom = α') :
RF.IsRightDerivedFunctor α W ↔ RF'.IsRightDerivedFunctor α' W := by
simp only [isRightDerivedFunctor_iff_isLeftKanExtension]
exact isLeftKanExtension_iff_of_iso e _ _ comm
section
variable [L.IsLocalization W] [RF.IsRightDerivedFunctor α W]
/-- Constructor for natural transformations from a right derived functor. -/
noncomputable def rightDerivedDesc (G : D ⥤ H) (β : F ⟶ L ⋙ G) : RF ⟶ G :=
have := IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension RF α W
RF.descOfIsLeftKanExtension α G β
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightDerived_fac (G : D ⥤ H) (β : F ⟶ L ⋙ G) :
α ≫ whiskerLeft L (RF.rightDerivedDesc α W G β) = β :=
have := IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension RF α W
RF.descOfIsLeftKanExtension_fac α G β
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightDerived_fac_app (G : D ⥤ H) (β : F ⟶ L ⋙ G) (X : C) :
α.app X ≫ (RF.rightDerivedDesc α W G β).app (L.obj X) = β.app X :=
have := IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension RF α W
RF.descOfIsLeftKanExtension_fac_app α G β X
include W in
lemma rightDerived_ext (G : D ⥤ H) (γ₁ γ₂ : RF ⟶ G)
(hγ : α ≫ whiskerLeft L γ₁ = α ≫ whiskerLeft L γ₂) : γ₁ = γ₂ :=
have := IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension RF α W
RF.hom_ext_of_isLeftKanExtension α γ₁ γ₂ hγ
/-- The natural transformation `RF ⟶ RF'` on right derived functors that is
induced by a natural transformation `F ⟶ F'`. -/
noncomputable def rightDerivedNatTrans (τ : F ⟶ F') : RF ⟶ RF' :=
RF.rightDerivedDesc α W RF' (τ ≫ α')
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightDerivedNatTrans_fac (τ : F ⟶ F') :
α ≫ whiskerLeft L (rightDerivedNatTrans RF RF' α α' W τ) = τ ≫ α' := by
dsimp only [rightDerivedNatTrans]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightDerivedNatTrans_app (τ : F ⟶ F') (X : C) :
α.app X ≫ (rightDerivedNatTrans RF RF' α α' W τ).app (L.obj X) =
τ.app X ≫ α'.app X := by
dsimp only [rightDerivedNatTrans]
simp
@[simp]
lemma rightDerivedNatTrans_id :
rightDerivedNatTrans RF RF α α W (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 RF :=
rightDerived_ext RF α W _ _ _ (by simp)
variable [RF'.IsRightDerivedFunctor α' W]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightDerivedNatTrans_comp (τ : F ⟶ F') (τ' : F' ⟶ F'') :
rightDerivedNatTrans RF RF' α α' W τ ≫ rightDerivedNatTrans RF' RF'' α' α'' W τ' =
rightDerivedNatTrans RF RF'' α α'' W (τ ≫ τ') :=
rightDerived_ext RF α W _ _ _ (by simp)
/-- The natural isomorphism `RF ≅ RF'` on right derived functors that is
induced by a natural isomorphism `F ≅ F'`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightDerivedNatIso (τ : F ≅ F') :
RF ≅ RF' where
hom := rightDerivedNatTrans RF RF' α α' W τ.hom
inv := rightDerivedNatTrans RF' RF α' α W τ.inv
/-- Uniqueness (up to a natural isomorphism) of the right derived functor. -/
noncomputable abbrev rightDerivedUnique [RF'.IsRightDerivedFunctor α'₂ W] : RF ≅ RF' :=
rightDerivedNatIso RF RF' α α'₂ W (Iso.refl F)
lemma isRightDerivedFunctor_iff_isIso_rightDerivedDesc (G : D ⥤ H) (β : F ⟶ L ⋙ G) :
G.IsRightDerivedFunctor β W ↔ IsIso (RF.rightDerivedDesc α W G β) := by
rw [isRightDerivedFunctor_iff_isLeftKanExtension]
have := IsRightDerivedFunctor.isLeftKanExtension _ α W
exact isLeftKanExtension_iff_isIso _ α _ (by simp)
end
variable (F)
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ H` has a right derived functor with respect to
`W : MorphismProperty C` if it has a left Kan extension along
`W.Q : C ⥤ W.Localization` (or any localization functor `L : C ⥤ D`
for `W`, see `hasRightDerivedFunctor_iff`). -/
class HasRightDerivedFunctor : Prop where
hasLeftKanExtension' : HasLeftKanExtension W.Q F
variable (L)
| variable [L.IsLocalization W]
lemma hasRightDerivedFunctor_iff :
F.HasRightDerivedFunctor W ↔ HasLeftKanExtension L F := by
have : HasRightDerivedFunctor F W ↔ HasLeftKanExtension W.Q F :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Functor/Derived/RightDerived.lean | 160 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Span
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules, we construct the lattice structure on Lie submodules and we
use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule`
* `LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian`
* `LieSubmodule.lieSpan`
* `LieSubmodule.map`
* `LieSubmodule.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubmodule
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure LieSubmodule extends Submodule R M where
lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier
attribute [nolint docBlame] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
attribute [coe] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R L M}
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
instance : SetLike (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
add_mem {N} _ _ := N.add_mem'
zero_mem N := N.zero_mem'
neg_mem {N} x hx := show -x ∈ N.toSubmodule from neg_mem hx
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (LieSubmodule R L M) R M where
smul_mem {s} c _ h := s.smul_mem' c h
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (0 : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 h]; apply lie_zero }⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance (priority := high) coeSort : CoeSort (LieSubmodule R L M) (Type w) where
coe N := { x : M // x ∈ N }
instance (priority := mid) coeSubmodule : CoeOut (LieSubmodule R L M) (Submodule R M) :=
⟨toSubmodule⟩
instance : CanLift (Submodule R M) (LieSubmodule R L M) (·)
(fun N ↦ ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ N → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N) where
prf N hN := ⟨⟨N, hN⟩, rfl⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((N : Submodule R M) : Set M) = N :=
rfl
theorem mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff' (p : Submodule R M) (h) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨p, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias mem_coeSubmodule := mem_toSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Set M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N :=
zero_mem N
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {x} (h : x ∈ N) : (⟨x, h⟩ : N) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext_iff_val
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSet_mk (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R M) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem := h } : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_mk := toSubmodule_mk
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M → Submodule R M) := fun x y h ↦ by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_injective := toSubmodule_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_inj : (N : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_inj := toSubmodule_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toSubmodule_eq_iff := toSubmodule_inj
/-- Copy of a `LieSubmodule` with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by simp [hs]
add_mem' x y := by rw [hs] at x y ⊢; exact N.add_mem' x y
smul_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem'
lie_mem := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance : LieRingModule L N where
bracket (x : L) (m : N) := ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩
add_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply add_lie
lie_add := by intro x m n; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_add
leibniz_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply leibniz_lie
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) :
(↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ :=
rfl
-- Copying instances from `Submodule` for correct discrimination keys
instance [IsNoetherian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsNoetherian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsNoetherian R N.toSubmodule
instance [IsArtinian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsArtinian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsArtinian R N.toSubmodule
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| NoZeroSMulDivisors R N.toSubmodule
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
instance instLieModule : LieModule R L N where
lie_smul := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_smul
smul_lie := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply smul_lie
instance [Subsingleton M] : Unique (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨⟨0⟩, fun _ ↦ (toSubmodule_inj _ _).mp (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
end LieSubmodule
variable {R M}
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R M) :
(∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨N, rfl⟩ _ _; exact N.lie_mem
· intro h; use { p with lie_mem := @h }
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable {L}
variable [LieAlgebra R L]
variable (K : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def toLieSubmodule : LieSubmodule R K L :=
{ (K : Submodule R L) with lie_mem := fun {x _} hy ↦ K.lie_mem x.property hy }
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLieSubmodule : (K.toLieSubmodule : Submodule R L) = K := rfl
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem mem_toLieSubmodule (x : L) : x ∈ K.toLieSubmodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
end LieSubalgebra
| end LieSubmodule
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Submodule.lean | 239 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
/-! # The groupoid of `C^n`, fiberwise-linear maps
This file contains preliminaries for the definition of a `C^n` vector bundle: an associated
`StructureGroupoid`, the groupoid of `contMDiffFiberwiseLinear` functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped Manifold Topology
/-! ### The groupoid of `C^n`, fiberwise-linear maps -/
variable {𝕜 B F : Type*} [TopologicalSpace B]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
namespace FiberwiseLinear
variable {φ φ' : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F} {U U' : Set B}
/-- For `B` a topological space and `F` a `𝕜`-normed space, a map from `U : Set B` to `F ≃L[𝕜] F`
determines a partial homeomorphism from `B × F` to itself by its action fiberwise. -/
def partialHomeomorph (φ : B → F ≃L[𝕜] F) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) :
PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F) where
toFun x := (x.1, φ x.1 x.2)
invFun x := (x.1, (φ x.1).symm x.2)
source := U ×ˢ univ
target := U ×ˢ univ
map_source' _x hx := mk_mem_prod hx.1 (mem_univ _)
map_target' _x hx := mk_mem_prod hx.1 (mem_univ _)
left_inv' _ _ := Prod.ext rfl (ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply _ _)
right_inv' _ _ := Prod.ext rfl (ContinuousLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply _ _)
open_source := hU.prod isOpen_univ
open_target := hU.prod isOpen_univ
continuousOn_toFun :=
have : ContinuousOn (fun p : B × F => ((φ p.1 : F →L[𝕜] F), p.2)) (U ×ˢ univ) :=
hφ.prodMap continuousOn_id
continuousOn_fst.prodMk (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn this)
continuousOn_invFun :=
have : ContinuousOn (fun p : B × F => (((φ p.1).symm : F →L[𝕜] F), p.2)) (U ×ˢ univ) :=
h2φ.prodMap continuousOn_id
continuousOn_fst.prodMk (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn this)
/-- Compute the composition of two partial homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
theorem trans_partialHomeomorph_apply (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) (hU' : IsOpen U')
(hφ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
(h2φ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') (b : B) (v : F) :
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ')
⟨b, v⟩ =
⟨b, φ' b (φ b v)⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Compute the source of the composition of two partial homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
theorem source_trans_partialHomeomorph (hU : IsOpen U)
(hφ : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U)
(h2φ : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U) (hU' : IsOpen U')
(hφ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => φ' x : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U')
| (h2φ' : ContinuousOn (fun x => (φ' x).symm : B → F →L[𝕜] F) U') :
(FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ hU hφ h2φ ≫ₕ
FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph φ' hU' hφ' h2φ').source =
(U ∩ U') ×ˢ univ := by
dsimp only [FiberwiseLinear.partialHomeomorph]; mfld_set_tac
/-- Compute the target of the composition of two partial homeomorphisms induced by fiberwise linear
equivalences. -/
theorem target_trans_partialHomeomorph (hU : IsOpen U)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/VectorBundle/FiberwiseLinear.lean | 74 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Isabel Longbottom, Kim Morrison, Apurva Nakade, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.PGame.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Combinatorial games.
In this file we construct an instance `OrderedAddCommGroup SetTheory.Game`.
## Multiplication on pre-games
We define the operations of multiplication and inverse on pre-games, and prove a few basic theorems
about them. Multiplication is not well-behaved under equivalence of pre-games i.e. `x ≈ y` does not
imply `x * z ≈ y * z`. Hence, multiplication is not a well-defined operation on games. Nevertheless,
the abelian group structure on games allows us to simplify many proofs for pre-games.
-/
-- Porting note: many definitions here are noncomputable as the compiler does not support PGame.rec
noncomputable section
namespace SetTheory
open Function PGame
universe u
-- Porting note: moved the setoid instance to PGame.lean
/-- The type of combinatorial games. In ZFC, a combinatorial game is constructed from
two sets of combinatorial games that have been constructed at an earlier
stage. To do this in type theory, we say that a combinatorial pre-game is built
inductively from two families of combinatorial games indexed over any type
in Type u. The resulting type `PGame.{u}` lives in `Type (u+1)`,
reflecting that it is a proper class in ZFC.
A combinatorial game is then constructed by quotienting by the equivalence
`x ≈ y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`. -/
abbrev Game :=
Quotient PGame.setoid
namespace Game
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11445): added this definition
/-- Negation of games. -/
instance : Neg Game where
neg := Quot.map Neg.neg <| fun _ _ => (neg_equiv_neg_iff).2
instance : Zero Game where zero := ⟦0⟧
instance : Add Game where
add := Quotient.map₂ HAdd.hAdd <| fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => PGame.add_congr hx hy
instance instAddCommGroupWithOneGame : AddCommGroupWithOne Game where
zero := ⟦0⟧
one := ⟦1⟧
add_zero := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact Quot.sound (add_zero_equiv x)
zero_add := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact Quot.sound (zero_add_equiv x)
add_assoc := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨z⟩
exact Quot.sound add_assoc_equiv
neg_add_cancel := Quotient.ind <| fun x => Quot.sound (neg_add_cancel_equiv x)
add_comm := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quot.sound add_comm_equiv
nsmul := nsmulRec
zsmul := zsmulRec
instance : Inhabited Game :=
⟨0⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Game) = ⟦0⟧ :=
rfl
instance instPartialOrderGame : PartialOrder Game where
le := Quotient.lift₂ (· ≤ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (le_congr hx hy)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact le_refl x
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨z⟩
exact @le_trans _ _ x y z
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h₁ h₂
apply Quot.sound
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lt := Quotient.lift₂ (· < ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lt_congr hx hy)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact @lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ x y
/-- The less or fuzzy relation on games.
If `0 ⧏ x` (less or fuzzy with), then Left can win `x` as the first player. -/
def LF : Game → Game → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PGame.LF fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lf_congr hx hy)
/-- On `Game`, simp-normal inequalities should use as few negations as possible. -/
@[simp]
theorem not_le : ∀ {x y : Game}, ¬x ≤ y ↔ Game.LF y x := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact PGame.not_le
/-- On `Game`, simp-normal inequalities should use as few negations as possible. -/
@[simp]
theorem not_lf : ∀ {x y : Game}, ¬Game.LF x y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact PGame.not_lf
/-- The fuzzy, confused, or incomparable relation on games.
If `x ‖ 0`, then the first player can always win `x`. -/
def Fuzzy : Game → Game → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PGame.Fuzzy fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (fuzzy_congr hx hy)
-- Porting note: had to replace ⧏ with LF, otherwise cannot differentiate with the operator on PGame
instance : IsTrichotomous Game LF :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
change _ ∨ ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ ∨ _
rw [Quotient.eq]
apply lf_or_equiv_or_gf⟩
/-! It can be useful to use these lemmas to turn `PGame` inequalities into `Game` inequalities, as
the `AddCommGroup` structure on `Game` often simplifies many proofs. -/
end Game
namespace PGame
-- Porting note: In a lot of places, I had to add explicitly that the quotient element was a Game.
-- In Lean4, quotients don't have the setoid as an instance argument,
-- but as an explicit argument, see https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/confusion.20between.20equivalence.20and.20instance.20setoid/near/360822354
theorem le_iff_game_le {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) ≤ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lf_iff_game_lf {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y ↔ Game.LF ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_game_lt {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) < ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem equiv_iff_game_eq {x y : PGame} : x ≈ y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y⟧ :=
(@Quotient.eq' _ _ x y).symm
alias ⟨game_eq, _⟩ := equiv_iff_game_eq
theorem fuzzy_iff_game_fuzzy {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y ↔ Game.Fuzzy ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
end PGame
namespace Game
local infixl:50 " ⧏ " => LF
local infixl:50 " ‖ " => Fuzzy
instance addLeftMono : AddLeftMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_le_add_left _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addRightMono : AddRightMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_le_add_right _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addRightStrictMono : AddRightStrictMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_lt_add_right _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
theorem add_lf_add_right : ∀ {b c : Game} (_ : b ⧏ c) (a), (b + a : Game) ⧏ c + a := by
rintro ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h ⟨a⟩
apply PGame.add_lf_add_right h
theorem add_lf_add_left : ∀ {b c : Game} (_ : b ⧏ c) (a), (a + b : Game) ⧏ a + c := by
rintro ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h ⟨a⟩
apply PGame.add_lf_add_left h
instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid Game :=
{ add_le_add_left := @add_le_add_left _ _ _ Game.addLeftMono }
/-- A small family of games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Game.{u}) :
BddAbove (Set.range f) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := PGame.bddAbove_range_of_small (Quotient.out ∘ f)
refine ⟨⟦x⟧, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [PGame.le_iff_game_le] using hx <| Set.mem_range_self i
/-- A small set of games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Game.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s := by
simpa using bddAbove_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → Game.{u})
/-- A small family of games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Game.{u}) :
BddBelow (Set.range f) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := PGame.bddBelow_range_of_small (Quotient.out ∘ f)
refine ⟨⟦x⟧, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [PGame.le_iff_game_le] using hx <| Set.mem_range_self i
/-- A small set of games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_of_small (s : Set Game.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddBelow s := by
simpa using bddBelow_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → Game.{u})
end Game
namespace PGame
@[simp] theorem quot_zero : (⟦0⟧ : Game) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_one : (⟦1⟧ : Game) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_neg (a : PGame) : (⟦-a⟧ : Game) = -⟦a⟧ := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_add (a b : PGame) : ⟦a + b⟧ = (⟦a⟧ : Game) + ⟦b⟧ := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_sub (a b : PGame) : ⟦a - b⟧ = (⟦a⟧ : Game) - ⟦b⟧ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quot_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, ⟦(n : PGame)⟧ = (n : Game)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [PGame.nat_succ, quot_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, quot_natCast]
rfl
theorem quot_eq_of_mk'_quot_eq {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves)
(R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves) (hl : ∀ i, (⟦x.moveLeft i⟧ : Game) = ⟦y.moveLeft (L i)⟧)
(hr : ∀ j, (⟦x.moveRight j⟧ : Game) = ⟦y.moveRight (R j)⟧) : (⟦x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y⟧ :=
game_eq (.of_equiv L R (fun _ => equiv_iff_game_eq.2 (hl _))
(fun _ => equiv_iff_game_eq.2 (hr _)))
/-! Multiplicative operations can be defined at the level of pre-games,
but to prove their properties we need to use the abelian group structure of games.
Hence we define them here. -/
/-- The product of `x = {xL | xR}` and `y = {yL | yR}` is
`{xL*y + x*yL - xL*yL, xR*y + x*yR - xR*yR | xL*y + x*yR - xL*yR, xR*y + x*yL - xR*yL}`. -/
instance : Mul PGame.{u} :=
⟨fun x y => by
| induction x generalizing y with | mk xl xr _ _ IHxl IHxr => _
induction y with | mk yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr => _
have y := mk yl yr yL yR
refine ⟨(xl × yl) ⊕ (xr × yr), (xl × yr) ⊕ (xr × yl), ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro (⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩)
· exact IHxl i y + IHyl j - IHxl i (yL j)
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Basic.lean | 249 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
/-!
# Group actions by isometries
In this file we define two typeclasses:
- `IsIsometricSMul M X` says that `M` multiplicatively acts on a (pseudo extended) metric space
`X` by isometries;
- `IsIsometricVAdd` is an additive version of `IsIsometricSMul`.
We also prove basic facts about isometric actions and define bundled isometries
`IsometryEquiv.constSMul`, `IsometryEquiv.mulLeft`, `IsometryEquiv.mulRight`,
`IsometryEquiv.divLeft`, `IsometryEquiv.divRight`, and `IsometryEquiv.inv`, as well as their
additive versions.
If `G` is a group, then `IsIsometricSMul G G` means that `G` has a left-invariant metric while
`IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G` means that `G` has a right-invariant metric. For a commutative group,
these two notions are equivalent. A group with a right-invariant metric can be also represented as a
`NormedGroup`.
-/
open Set
open ENNReal Pointwise
universe u v w
variable (M : Type u) (G : Type v) (X : Type w)
/-- An additive action is isometric if each map `x ↦ c +ᵥ x` is an isometry. -/
class IsIsometricVAdd [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [VAdd M X] : Prop where
protected isometry_vadd : ∀ c : M, Isometry ((c +ᵥ ·) : X → X)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias IsometricVAdd := IsIsometricVAdd
/-- A multiplicative action is isometric if each map `x ↦ c • x` is an isometry. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsIsometricSMul [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] : Prop where
protected isometry_smul : ∀ c : M, Isometry ((c • ·) : X → X)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias IsometricSMul := IsIsometricSMul
-- Porting note: Lean 4 doesn't support `[]` in classes, so make a lemma instead of `export`ing
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_smul {M : Type u} (X : Type w) [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) : Isometry (c • · : X → X) :=
IsIsometricSMul.isometry_smul c
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) IsIsometricSMul.to_continuousConstSMul [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X] : ContinuousConstSMul M X :=
⟨fun c => (isometry_smul X c).continuous⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) IsIsometricSMul.opposite_of_comm [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X] [IsCentralScalar M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] : IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X :=
⟨fun c x y => by simpa only [← op_smul_eq_smul] using isometry_smul X c.unop x y⟩
variable {M G X}
section EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [Group G] [MulAction G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_smul_left [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
edist (c • x) (c • y) = edist x y :=
isometry_smul X c x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ediam_smul [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (s : Set X) :
EMetric.diam (c • s) = EMetric.diam s :=
(isometry_smul _ _).ediam_image s
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_mul_left [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a : M) :
Isometry (a * ·) :=
isometry_smul M a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_mul_left [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
edist (a * b) (a * c) = edist b c :=
isometry_mul_left a b c
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a : M) :
Isometry fun x => x * a :=
isometry_smul M (MulOpposite.op a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
edist (a * c) (b * c) = edist a b :=
isometry_mul_right c a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : edist (a / c) (b / c) = edist a b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_inv_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(a b : G) : edist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = edist a b := by
rw [← edist_mul_left a, ← edist_mul_right _ _ b, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right,
edist_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] :
Isometry (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
edist_inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(x y : G) : edist x⁻¹ y = edist x y⁻¹ := by rw [← edist_inv_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_div_left [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(a b c : G) : edist (a / b) (a / c) = edist b c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_left, edist_inv_inv]
namespace IsometryEquiv
/-- If a group `G` acts on `X` by isometries, then `IsometryEquiv.constSMul` is the isometry of
`X` given by multiplication of a constant element of the group. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! toEquiv apply) "If an additive group `G` acts on `X` by isometries,
then `IsometryEquiv.constVAdd` is the isometry of `X` given by addition of a constant element of the
group."]
def constSMul (c : G) : X ≃ᵢ X where
toEquiv := MulAction.toPerm c
isometry_toFun := isometry_smul X c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem constSMul_symm (c : G) : (constSMul c : X ≃ᵢ X).symm = constSMul c⁻¹ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace G]
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ x * y` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def mulLeft [IsIsometricSMul G G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.mulLeft c
isometry_toFun := edist_mul_left c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulLeft_symm [IsIsometricSMul G G] (x : G) :
(mulLeft x).symm = IsometryEquiv.mulLeft x⁻¹ :=
constSMul_symm x
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ y * x` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def mulRight [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.mulRight c
isometry_toFun a b := edist_mul_right a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRight_symm [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (x : G) : (mulRight x).symm = mulRight x⁻¹ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Division `y ↦ y / x` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Subtraction `y ↦ y - x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def divRight [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.divRight c
isometry_toFun a b := edist_div_right a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem divRight_symm [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : (divRight c).symm = mulRight c :=
ext fun _ => rfl
variable [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
/-- Division `y ↦ x / y` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply symm_apply toEquiv)
"Subtraction `y ↦ x - y` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def divLeft (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.divLeft c
isometry_toFun := edist_div_left c
variable (G)
/-- Inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def inv : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.inv G
isometry_toFun := edist_inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem inv_symm : (inv G).symm = inv G := rfl
end IsometryEquiv
namespace EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_emetric_ball _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' ball x r = ball (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_ball]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : c • closedBall x r = closedBall (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_emetric_closedBall _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r = closedBall (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_closedBall]
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_ball [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_ball a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_ball [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_ball (MulOpposite.op a) b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_closedBall a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_closedBall (MulOpposite.op a) b r
end EMetric
end EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
dist (c • x) (c • y) = dist x y :=
(isometry_smul X c).dist_eq x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
nndist (c • x) (c • y) = nndist x y :=
(isometry_smul X c).nndist_eq x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (s : Set X) :
Metric.diam (c • s) = Metric.diam s :=
(isometry_smul _ _).diam_image s
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_left [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
dist (a * b) (a * c) = dist b c :=
dist_smul a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_mul_left [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
nndist (a * b) (a * c) = nndist b c :=
nndist_smul a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
dist (a * c) (b * c) = dist a b :=
dist_smul (MulOpposite.op c) a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_mul_right [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
nndist (a * c) (b * c) = nndist a b :=
nndist_smul (MulOpposite.op c) a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : dist (a / c) (b / c) = dist a b := by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : nndist (a / c) (b / c) = nndist a b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, nndist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_inv_inv [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) : dist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = dist a b :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv G).dist_eq a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_inv_inv [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) : nndist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = nndist a b :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv G).nndist_eq a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_left [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b c : G) : dist (a / b) (a / c) = dist b c := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_div_left [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b c : G) : nndist (a / b) (a / c) = nndist b c := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
/-- If `G` acts isometrically on `X`, then the image of a bounded set in `X` under scalar
multiplication by `c : G` is bounded. See also `Bornology.IsBounded.smul₀` for a similar lemma about
normed spaces. -/
@[to_additive "Given an additive isometric action of `G` on `X`, the image of a bounded set in `X`
under translation by `c : G` is bounded"]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X] {s : Set X}
(hs : IsBounded s) (c : G) : IsBounded (c • s) :=
(isometry_smul X c).lipschitz.isBounded_image hs
namespace Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace X] [Group G] [MulAction G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_ball _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) : (c • ·) ⁻¹' ball x r = ball (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_ball]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) : c • closedBall x r = closedBall (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_closedBall _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r = closedBall (c⁻¹ • x) r := by rw [preimage_smul, smul_closedBall]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_sphere (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) : c • sphere x r = sphere (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_sphere _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_sphere (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' sphere x r = sphere (c⁻¹ • x) r := by rw [preimage_smul, smul_sphere]
variable [PseudoMetricSpace G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_ball [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_ball a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_ball [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_ball (MulOpposite.op a) b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_closedBall a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_closedBall (MulOpposite.op a) b r
end Metric
section Instances
variable {Y : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [PseudoEMetricSpace Y] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X]
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.instIsIsometricSMul [SMul M Y] [IsIsometricSMul M Y] : IsIsometricSMul M (X × Y) :=
⟨fun c => (isometry_smul X c).prodMap (isometry_smul Y c)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.isIsometricSMul' {N} [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] [Mul N]
[PseudoEMetricSpace N] [IsIsometricSMul N N] : IsIsometricSMul (M × N) (M × N) :=
⟨fun c => (isometry_smul M c.1).prodMap (isometry_smul N c.2)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.isIsometricSMul'' {N} [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
[Mul N] [PseudoEMetricSpace N] [IsIsometricSMul Nᵐᵒᵖ N] :
IsIsometricSMul (M × N)ᵐᵒᵖ (M × N) :=
⟨fun c => (isometry_mul_right c.unop.1).prodMap (isometry_mul_right c.unop.2)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Units.isIsometricSMul [Monoid M] : IsIsometricSMul Mˣ X :=
⟨fun c => isometry_smul X (c : M)⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : IsIsometricSMul M Xᵐᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun c x y => by simpa only using edist_smul_left c x.unop y.unop⟩
@[to_additive]
instance ULift.isIsometricSMul : IsIsometricSMul (ULift M) X :=
⟨fun c => by simpa only using isometry_smul X c.down⟩
@[to_additive]
instance ULift.isIsometricSMul' : IsIsometricSMul M (ULift X) :=
⟨fun c x y => by simpa only using edist_smul_left c x.1 y.1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance {ι} {X : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SMul M (X i)] [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, IsIsometricSMul M (X i)] : IsIsometricSMul M (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun c => .piMap (fun _ => (c • ·)) fun i => isometry_smul (X i) c⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.isIsometricSMul' {ι} {M X : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, SMul (M i) (X i)]
[∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (X i)] [∀ i, IsIsometricSMul (M i) (X i)] :
IsIsometricSMul (∀ i, M i) (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun c => .piMap (fun i => (c i • ·)) fun _ => isometry_smul _ _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.isIsometricSMul'' {ι} {M : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Mul (M i)]
[∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (M i)] [∀ i, IsIsometricSMul (M i)ᵐᵒᵖ (M i)] :
IsIsometricSMul (∀ i, M i)ᵐᵒᵖ (∀ i, M i) :=
⟨fun c => .piMap (fun i (x : M i) => x * c.unop i) fun _ => isometry_mul_right _⟩
instance Additive.isIsIsometricVAdd : IsIsometricVAdd (Additive M) X :=
⟨fun c => isometry_smul X c.toMul⟩
instance Additive.isIsIsometricVAdd' [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] :
IsIsometricVAdd (Additive M) (Additive M) :=
⟨fun c x y => edist_smul_left c.toMul x.toMul y.toMul⟩
instance Additive.isIsIsometricVAdd'' [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] :
IsIsometricVAdd (Additive M)ᵃᵒᵖ (Additive M) :=
⟨fun c x y => edist_smul_left (MulOpposite.op c.unop.toMul) x.toMul y.toMul⟩
instance Multiplicative.isIsometricSMul {M X} [VAdd M X] [PseudoEMetricSpace X]
[IsIsometricVAdd M X] : IsIsometricSMul (Multiplicative M) X :=
⟨fun c => isometry_vadd X c.toAdd⟩
instance Multiplicative.isIsometricSMul' [Add M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricVAdd M M] :
IsIsometricSMul (Multiplicative M) (Multiplicative M) :=
⟨fun c x y => edist_vadd_left c.toAdd x.toAdd y.toAdd⟩
instance Multiplicative.isIsIsometricVAdd'' [Add M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M]
[IsIsometricVAdd Mᵃᵒᵖ M] : IsIsometricSMul (Multiplicative M)ᵐᵒᵖ (Multiplicative M) :=
⟨fun c x y => edist_vadd_left (AddOpposite.op c.unop.toAdd) x.toAdd y.toAdd⟩
end Instances
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/IsometricSMul.lean | 485 | 488 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.IsFreeGroup
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# The coproduct (a.k.a. the free product) of groups or monoids
Given an `ι`-indexed family `M` of monoids,
we define their coproduct (a.k.a. free product) `Monoid.CoprodI M`.
As usual, we use the suffix `I` for an indexed (co)product,
leaving `Coprod` for the coproduct of two monoids.
When `ι` and all `M i` have decidable equality,
the free product bijects with the type `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` of reduced words.
This bijection is constructed
by defining an action of `Monoid.CoprodI M` on `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
When `M i` are all groups, `Monoid.CoprodI M` is also a group
(and the coproduct in the category of groups).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.CoprodI M`: the free product, defined as a quotient of a free monoid.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.of {i} : M i →* Monoid.CoprodI M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift : (∀ {i}, M i →* N) ≃ (Monoid.CoprodI M →* N)`: the universal property.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`: the type of reduced words.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word.equiv M : Monoid.CoprodI M ≃ word M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.NeWord M i j`: an inductive description of non-empty words
with first letter from `M i` and last letter from `M j`,
together with an API (`singleton`, `append`, `head`, `tail`, `to_word`, `Prod`, `inv`).
Used in the proof of the Ping-Pong-lemma.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift_injective_of_ping_pong`: The Ping-Pong-lemma,
proving injectivity of the `lift`. See the documentation of that theorem for more information.
## Remarks
There are many answers to the question "what is the coproduct of a family `M` of monoids?",
and they are all equivalent but not obviously equivalent.
We provide two answers.
The first, almost tautological answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI M`,
which is a quotient of the type of words in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`.
It's straightforward to define and easy to prove its universal property.
But this answer is not completely satisfactory,
because it's difficult to tell when two elements `x y : Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct
since `Monoid.CoprodI M` is defined as a quotient.
The second, maximally efficient answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
An element of `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` is a word in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
where the letter `⟨i, 1⟩` doesn't occur and no adjacent letters share an index `i`.
Since we only work with reduced words, there is no need for quotienting,
and it is easy to tell when two elements are distinct.
However it's not obvious that this is even a monoid!
We prove that every element of `Monoid.CoprodI M` can be represented by a unique reduced word,
i.e. `Monoid.CoprodI M` and `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` are equivalent types.
This means that `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` can be given a monoid structure,
and it lets us tell when two elements of `Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct.
There is also a completely tautological, maximally inefficient answer
given by `MonCat.Colimits.ColimitType`.
Whereas `Monoid.CoprodI M` at least ensures that
(any instance of) associativity holds by reflexivity,
in this answer associativity holds because of quotienting.
Yet another answer, which is constructively more satisfying,
could be obtained by showing that `Monoid.CoprodI.Rel` is confluent.
## References
[van der Waerden, *Free products of groups*][MR25465]
-/
open Set
variable {ι : Type*} (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Monoid (M i)]
/-- A relation on the free monoid on alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
relating `⟨i, 1⟩` with `1` and `⟨i, x⟩ * ⟨i, y⟩` with `⟨i, x * y⟩`. -/
inductive Monoid.CoprodI.Rel : FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → Prop
| of_one (i : ι) : Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, 1⟩) 1
| of_mul {i : ι} (x y : M i) :
Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x⟩ * FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, y⟩) (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x * y⟩)
/-- The free product (categorical coproduct) of an indexed family of monoids. -/
def Monoid.CoprodI : Type _ := (conGen (Monoid.CoprodI.Rel M)).Quotient
-- The `Monoid` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Monoid (Monoid.CoprodI M) := by
delta Monoid.CoprodI; infer_instance
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.CoprodI M) :=
⟨1⟩
namespace Monoid.CoprodI
/-- The type of reduced words. A reduced word cannot contain a letter `1`, and no two adjacent
letters can come from the same summand. -/
@[ext]
structure Word where
/-- A `Word` is a `List (Σ i, M i)`, such that `1` is not in the list, and no
two adjacent letters are from the same summand -/
toList : List (Σi, M i)
/-- A reduced word does not contain `1` -/
ne_one : ∀ l ∈ toList, Sigma.snd l ≠ 1
/-- Adjacent letters are not from the same summand. -/
chain_ne : toList.Chain' fun l l' => Sigma.fst l ≠ Sigma.fst l'
variable {M}
/-- The inclusion of a summand into the free product. -/
def of {i : ι} : M i →* CoprodI M where
toFun x := Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i x)
map_one' := (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_one i))
map_mul' x y := Eq.symm <| (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_mul x y))
theorem of_apply {i} (m : M i) : of m = Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i m) :=
rfl
variable {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
-- Porting note: higher `ext` priority
@[ext 1100]
theorem ext_hom (f g : CoprodI M →* N) (h : ∀ i, f.comp (of : M i →* _) = g.comp of) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
FreeMonoid.hom_eq fun ⟨i, x⟩ => by
rw [MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← of_apply]
unfold CoprodI
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h]
/-- A map out of the free product corresponds to a family of maps out of the summands. This is the
universal property of the free product, characterizing it as a categorical coproduct. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift : (∀ i, M i →* N) ≃ (CoprodI M →* N) where
toFun fi :=
Con.lift _ (FreeMonoid.lift fun p : Σi, M i => fi p.fst p.snd) <|
Con.conGen_le <| by
simp_rw [Con.ker_rel]
rintro _ _ (i | ⟨x, y⟩) <;> simp
invFun f _ := f.comp of
left_inv := by
intro fi
ext i x
rfl
right_inv := by
intro f
ext i x
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) i : (lift fi).comp of = fi i :=
congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_apply fi) i
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) {i} (m : M i) : lift fi (of m) = fi i m :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_of ..) m
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of' {N} [Monoid N] (f : CoprodI M →* N) :
lift (fun i ↦ f.comp (of (i := i))) = f :=
lift.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem lift_of' : lift (fun i ↦ (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = .id (CoprodI M) :=
lift_comp_of' (.id _)
theorem of_leftInverse [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Function.LeftInverse (lift <| Pi.mulSingle i (MonoidHom.id (M i))) of := fun x => by
simp only [lift_of, Pi.mulSingle_eq_same, MonoidHom.id_apply]
theorem of_injective (i : ι) : Function.Injective (of : M i →* _) := by
classical exact (of_leftInverse i).injective
theorem mrange_eq_iSup {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) = ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) := by
rw [lift, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Con.lift_range, FreeMonoid.mrange_lift,
range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
simp only [MonoidHom.mclosure_range]
theorem lift_mrange_le {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) {s : Submonoid N} :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) ≤ s ↔ ∀ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) ≤ s := by
simp [mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mrange_of : ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (of : M i →* CoprodI M) = ⊤ := by
simp [← mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem mclosure_iUnion_range_of :
Submonoid.closure (⋃ i, Set.range (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = ⊤ := by
simp [Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_left {motive : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : motive 1)
(mul : ∀ {i} (m : M i) x, motive x → motive (of m * x)) : motive m := by
induction m using Submonoid.induction_of_closure_eq_top_left mclosure_iUnion_range_of with
| one => exact one
| mul x hx y ihy =>
obtain ⟨i, m, rfl⟩ : ∃ (i : ι) (m : M i), of m = x := by simpa using hx
exact mul m y ihy
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {motive : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : motive 1)
(of : ∀ (i) (m : M i), motive (of m))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive m := by
induction m using CoprodI.induction_left with
| one => exact one
| mul m x hx => exact mul _ _ (of _ _) hx
section Group
variable (G : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Group (G i)]
instance : Inv (CoprodI G) where
inv :=
MulOpposite.unop ∘ lift fun i => (of : G i →* _).op.comp (MulEquiv.inv' (G i)).toMonoidHom
theorem inv_def (x : CoprodI G) :
x⁻¹ =
MulOpposite.unop
(lift (fun i => (of : G i →* _).op.comp (MulEquiv.inv' (G i)).toMonoidHom) x) :=
rfl
| instance : Group (CoprodI G) :=
{ inv_mul_cancel := by
intro m
rw [inv_def]
induction m using CoprodI.induction_on with
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CoprodI.lean | 234 | 238 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Gluing
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Diagonal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ChosenFiniteProducts.Over
/-!
# Fibred products of schemes
In this file we construct the fibred product of schemes via gluing.
We roughly follow [har77] Theorem 3.3.
In particular, the main construction is to show that for an open cover `{ Uᵢ }` of `X`, if there
exist fibred products `Uᵢ ×[Z] Y` for each `i`, then there exists a fibred product `X ×[Z] Y`.
Then, for constructing the fibred product for arbitrary schemes `X, Y, Z`, we can use the
construction to reduce to the case where `X, Y, Z` are all affine, where fibred products are
constructed via tensor products.
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme
namespace Pullback
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : OpenCover.{u} X) (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [∀ i, HasPullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g]
/-- The intersection of `Uᵢ ×[Z] Y` and `Uⱼ ×[Z] Y` is given by (Uᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uⱼ -/
def v (i j : 𝒰.J) : Scheme :=
pullback ((pullback.fst (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g) ≫ 𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map j)
/-- The canonical transition map `(Uᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uⱼ ⟶ (Uⱼ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uᵢ` given by the fact
that pullbacks are associative and symmetric. -/
def t (i j : 𝒰.J) : v 𝒰 f g i j ⟶ v 𝒰 f g j i := by
have : HasPullback (pullback.snd _ _ ≫ 𝒰.map i ≫ f) g :=
hasPullback_assoc_symm (𝒰.map j) (𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g
have : HasPullback (pullback.snd _ _ ≫ 𝒰.map j ≫ f) g :=
hasPullback_assoc_symm (𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map j) (𝒰.map j ≫ f) g
refine (pullbackSymmetry ..).hom ≫ (pullbackAssoc ..).inv ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackAssoc ..).hom ≫ (pullbackSymmetry ..).hom
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· rw [pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc, pullback.condition_assoc, Category.comp_id]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_fst_fst (i j : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_fst,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_fst,
pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_fst_snd (i j : 𝒰.J) :
t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_snd,
pullback.lift_snd, Category.comp_id, pullbackAssoc_inv_snd, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_snd (i j : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd, pullbackAssoc_hom_fst,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_snd,
pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc]
theorem t_id (i : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i i = 𝟙 _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> rw [Category.id_comp]
· apply pullback.hom_ext
· rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]; simp only [pullback.condition, Category.assoc, t_fst_fst]
· simp only [Category.assoc, t_fst_snd]
· rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]; simp only [pullback.condition, t_snd, Category.assoc]
/-- The inclusion map of `V i j = (Uᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Uⱼ ⟶ Uᵢ ×[Z] Y` -/
abbrev fV (i j : 𝒰.J) : v 𝒰 f g i j ⟶ pullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g :=
pullback.fst _ _
/-- The map `((Xᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xⱼ) ×[Xᵢ ×[Z] Y] ((Xᵢ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xₖ)` ⟶
`((Xⱼ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xₖ) ×[Xⱼ ×[Z] Y] ((Xⱼ ×[Z] Y) ×[X] Xᵢ)` needed for gluing -/
def t' (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
pullback (fV 𝒰 f g i j) (fV 𝒰 f g i k) ⟶ pullback (fV 𝒰 f g j k) (fV 𝒰 f g j i) := by
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso ..).hom ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso ..).inv
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (t 𝒰 f g i j) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· simp_rw [Category.comp_id, t_fst_fst_assoc, ← pullback.condition]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_fst_fst_fst (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_fst,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
@[simp, reassoc]
| theorem t'_fst_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_snd,
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Pullbacks.lean | 110 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Indexed product of uniform spaces
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Uniformity Topology
open Filter UniformSpace Function Set
universe u
variable {ι ι' β : Type*} (α : ι → Type u) [U : ∀ i, UniformSpace (α i)] [UniformSpace β]
instance Pi.uniformSpace : UniformSpace (∀ i, α i) :=
UniformSpace.ofCoreEq (⨅ i, UniformSpace.comap (eval i) (U i)).toCore
Pi.topologicalSpace <|
Eq.symm toTopologicalSpace_iInf
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_eq :
Pi.uniformSpace α = ⨅ i, UniformSpace.comap (eval i) (U i) := by
ext : 1; rfl
theorem Pi.uniformity :
𝓤 (∀ i, α i) = ⨅ i : ι, (Filter.comap fun a => (a.1 i, a.2 i)) (𝓤 (α i)) :=
iInf_uniformity
variable {α}
instance [Countable ι] [∀ i, IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α i))] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (∀ i, α i)) := by
rw [Pi.uniformity]
infer_instance
theorem uniformContinuous_pi {β : Type*} [UniformSpace β] {f : β → ∀ i, α i} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous fun x => f x i := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, Pi.uniformity, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
variable (α)
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_proj (i : ι) : UniformContinuous fun a : ∀ i : ι, α i => a i :=
uniformContinuous_pi.1 uniformContinuous_id i
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp' (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformContinuous (fun (f : (∀ i, α i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
uniformContinuous_pi.mpr fun j ↦ uniformContinuous_proj α (φ j)
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformContinuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → β) → (ι' → β)) :=
Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp' _ φ
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_postcomp' {β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, UniformSpace (β i)]
{g : ∀ i, α i → β i} (hg : ∀ i, UniformContinuous (g i)) :
UniformContinuous (fun (f : (∀ i, α i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
uniformContinuous_pi.mpr fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| uniformContinuous_proj α i
theorem Pi.uniformContinuous_postcomp {α : Type*} [UniformSpace α] {g : α → β}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (g ∘ · : (ι → α) → (ι → β)) :=
Pi.uniformContinuous_postcomp' _ fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_comap_precomp' (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformSpace.comap (fun g i' ↦ g (φ i')) (Pi.uniformSpace (fun i' ↦ α (φ i'))) =
⨅ i', UniformSpace.comap (eval (φ i')) (U (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.uniformSpace_eq, UniformSpace.comap_iInf, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap, comp_def]
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_comap_precomp (φ : ι' → ι) :
UniformSpace.comap (· ∘ φ) (Pi.uniformSpace (fun _ ↦ β)) =
⨅ i', UniformSpace.comap (eval (φ i')) ‹UniformSpace β› :=
uniformSpace_comap_precomp' (fun _ ↦ β) φ
lemma Pi.uniformContinuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
UniformContinuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, α i) → (∀ i : S, α i)) :=
Pi.uniformContinuous_precomp' _ ((↑) : S → ι)
lemma Pi.uniformSpace_comap_restrict (S : Set ι) :
UniformSpace.comap (S.restrict) (Pi.uniformSpace (fun i : S ↦ α i)) =
⨅ i ∈ S, UniformSpace.comap (eval i) (U i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp
[← iInf_subtype'', ← uniformSpace_comap_precomp' _ ((↑) : S → ι), Set.restrict]
lemma cauchy_pi_iff [Nonempty ι] {l : Filter (∀ i, α i)} :
Cauchy l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (map (eval i) l) := by
simp_rw [Pi.uniformSpace_eq, cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace, cauchy_comap_uniformSpace]
lemma cauchy_pi_iff' {l : Filter (∀ i, α i)} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (map (eval i) l) := by
simp_rw [Pi.uniformSpace_eq, cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace', cauchy_comap_uniformSpace]
lemma Cauchy.pi [Nonempty ι] {l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)} (hl : ∀ i, Cauchy (l i)) :
Cauchy (Filter.pi l) := by
have := fun i ↦ (hl i).1
simpa [cauchy_pi_iff]
instance Pi.complete [∀ i, CompleteSpace (α i)] : CompleteSpace (∀ i, α i) where
complete {f} hf := by
| have := hf.1
simp_rw [cauchy_pi_iff', cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds] at hf
choose x hx using hf
use x
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Pi.lean | 103 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Absolute values in linear ordered rings.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_zpow (n : ℤ) (a : α) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ |n| := by
obtain n0 | n0 := le_total 0 n
· obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le n0
simp only [mabs_pow, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast]
· obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (neg_nonneg.2 n0)
rw [← mabs_inv, ← zpow_neg, ← abs_neg, h, zpow_natCast, Nat.abs_cast, zpow_natCast]
exact mabs_pow m _
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
lemma odd_abs [LinearOrder α] [Ring α] {a : α} : Odd (abs a) ↔ Odd a := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, odd_neg]
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {n : ℕ} {a b : α}
@[simp] lemma abs_one : |(1 : α)| = 1 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_one
lemma abs_two : |(2 : α)| = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma abs_mul (a b : α) : |a * b| = |a| * |b| := by
rw [abs_eq (mul_nonneg (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b))]
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha <;> rcases le_total b 0 with hb | hb <;>
simp only [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, true_or, or_true, eq_self_iff_true, neg_mul,
mul_neg, neg_neg, *]
/-- `abs` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
def absHom : α →*₀ α where
toFun := abs
map_zero' := abs_zero
map_one' := abs_one
map_mul' := abs_mul
@[simp]
lemma abs_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a ^ n| = |a| ^ n := (absHom.toMonoidHom : α →* α).map_pow _ _
lemma pow_abs (a : α) (n : ℕ) : |a| ^ n = |a ^ n| := (abs_pow a n).symm
lemma Even.pow_abs (hn : Even n) (a : α) : |a| ^ n = a ^ n := by
rw [← abs_pow, abs_eq_self]; exact hn.pow_nonneg _
lemma abs_neg_one_pow (n : ℕ) : |(-1 : α) ^ n| = 1 := by rw [← pow_abs, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
lemma abs_pow_eq_one (a : α) (h : n ≠ 0) : |a ^ n| = 1 ↔ |a| = 1 := by
convert pow_left_inj₀ (abs_nonneg a) zero_le_one h
exacts [(pow_abs _ _).symm, (one_pow _).symm]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma abs_mul_abs_self (a : α) : |a| * |a| = a * a :=
abs_by_cases (fun x => x * x = a * a) rfl (neg_mul_neg a a)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_self (a : α) : |a * a| = a * a := by rw [abs_mul, abs_mul_abs_self]
lemma abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq : |a| = |b| ↔ a * a = b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact (mul_self_inj (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)).symm
lemma abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt : |a| < |b| ↔ a * a < b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_iff_mul_self_le : |a| ≤ |b| ↔ a * a ≤ b * b := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self, ← abs_mul_abs_self b]
exact mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma abs_le_one_iff_mul_self_le_one : |a| ≤ 1 ↔ a * a ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [abs_one, one_mul] using abs_le_iff_mul_self_le (a := a) (b := 1)
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma sq_abs (a : α) : |a| ^ 2 = a ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_abs_self a
lemma abs_sq (x : α) : |x ^ 2| = x ^ 2 := by simpa only [sq] using abs_mul_self x
lemma sq_lt_sq : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 ↔ |a| < |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_lt_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_lt_sq' (h1 : -b < a) (h2 : a < b) : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 :=
sq_lt_sq.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (abs_lt.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma sq_le_sq : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 ↔ |a| ≤ |b| := by
simpa only [sq_abs] using sq_le_sq₀ (abs_nonneg a) (abs_nonneg b)
lemma sq_le_sq' (h1 : -b ≤ a) (h2 : a ≤ b) : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
sq_le_sq.2 (le_trans (abs_le.mpr ⟨h1, h2⟩) (le_abs_self _))
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| < b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_lt_sq]
lemma abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq' (h : a ^ 2 < b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b < a ∧ a < b :=
abs_lt.1 <| abs_lt_of_sq_lt_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : |a| ≤ b := by
rwa [← abs_of_nonneg hb, ← sq_le_sq]
theorem le_of_sq_le_sq (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_abs_self a |>.trans <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
lemma abs_le_of_sq_le_sq' (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : -b ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b :=
abs_le.1 <| abs_le_of_sq_le_sq h hb
| lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_abs_eq_abs (a b : α) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ |a| = |b| := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, sq_le_sq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Abs.lean | 125 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin
/-!
# Definition of `ZMod n` + basic results.
This file provides the basic details of `ZMod n`, including its commutative ring structure.
## Implementation details
This used to be inlined into `Data.ZMod.Basic`. This file imports `CharP.Lemmas`, which is an
issue; all `CharP` instances create an `Algebra (ZMod p) R` instance; however, this instance may
not be definitionally equal to other `Algebra` instances (for example, `GaloisField` also has an
`Algebra` instance as it is defined as a `SplittingField`). The way to fix this is to use the
forgetful inheritance pattern, and make `CharP` carry the data of what the `smul` should be (so
for example, the `smul` on the `GaloisField` `CharP` instance should be equal to the `smul` from
its `SplittingField` structure); there is only one possible `ZMod p` algebra for any `p`, so this
is not an issue mathematically. For this to be possible, however, we need `CharP.Lemmas` to be
able to import some part of `ZMod`.
-/
namespace Fin
/-!
## Ring structure on `Fin n`
We define a commutative ring structure on `Fin n`.
Afterwards, when we define `ZMod n` in terms of `Fin n`, we use these definitions
to register the ring structure on `ZMod n` as type class instance.
-/
open Nat.ModEq Int
/-- Multiplicative commutative semigroup structure on `Fin n`. -/
instance instCommSemigroup (n : ℕ) : CommSemigroup (Fin n) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Mul (Fin n)) with
mul_assoc := fun ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩ ⟨c, _⟩ =>
Fin.eq_of_val_eq <|
calc
a * b % n * c ≡ a * b * c [MOD n] := (Nat.mod_modEq _ _).mul_right _
_ ≡ a * (b * c) [MOD n] := by rw [mul_assoc]
_ ≡ a * (b * c % n) [MOD n] := (Nat.mod_modEq _ _).symm.mul_left _
mul_comm := Fin.mul_comm }
private theorem left_distrib_aux (n : ℕ) : ∀ a b c : Fin n, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
fun ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩ ⟨c, _⟩ =>
| Fin.eq_of_val_eq <|
calc
a * ((b + c) % n) ≡ a * (b + c) [MOD n] := (Nat.mod_modEq _ _).mul_left _
_ ≡ a * b + a * c [MOD n] := by rw [mul_add]
_ ≡ a * b % n + a * c % n [MOD n] := (Nat.mod_modEq _ _).symm.add (Nat.mod_modEq _ _).symm
/-- Commutative ring structure on `Fin n`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Defs.lean | 58 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZeta
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeriesComplex
/-!
# Definition of the Riemann zeta function
## Main definitions:
* `riemannZeta`: the Riemann zeta function `ζ : ℂ → ℂ`.
* `completedRiemannZeta`: the completed zeta function `Λ : ℂ → ℂ`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (away from the poles of `Γ(s / 2)`).
* `completedRiemannZeta₀`: the entire function `Λ₀` satisfying
`Λ₀(s) = Λ(s) + 1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s` wherever the RHS is defined.
Note that mathematically `ζ(s)` is undefined at `s = 1`, while `Λ(s)` is undefined at both `s = 0`
and `s = 1`. Our construction assigns some values at these points; exact formulae involving the
Euler-Mascheroni constant will follow in a subsequent PR.
## Main results:
* `differentiable_completedZeta₀` : the function `Λ₀(s)` is entire.
* `differentiableAt_completedZeta` : the function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and
`s = 1`.
* `differentiableAt_riemannZeta` : the function `ζ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 1`.
* `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow` : for `1 < re s`, we have
`ζ(s) = ∑' (n : ℕ), 1 / (n + 1) ^ s`.
* `completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub`, `completedRiemannZeta_one_sub`, and `riemannZeta_one_sub` :
functional equation relating values at `s` and `1 - s`
For special-value formulae expressing `ζ (2 * k)` and `ζ (1 - 2 * k)` in terms of Bernoulli numbers
see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaValues`. For computation of the constant term as
`s → 1`, see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.ZetaAsymp`.
## Outline of proofs:
These results are mostly special cases of more general results for even Hurwitz zeta functions
proved in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaEven`.
-/
open CharZero Set Filter HurwitzZeta
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp
open scoped Topology Real
noncomputable section
/-!
## Definition of the completed Riemann zeta
-/
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function with its poles removed, `Λ(s) + 1 / s - 1 / (s - 1)`. -/
def completedRiemannZeta₀ (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function, `Λ(s)`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (up to a minor correction at `s = 0`). -/
def completedRiemannZeta (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀,
hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma completedRiemannZeta_eq (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s - 1 / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
simp_rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, if_true]
/-- The modified completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s) + 1 / s + 1 / (1 - s)` is entire. -/
theorem differentiable_completedZeta₀ : Differentiable ℂ completedRiemannZeta₀ :=
differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_completedZeta {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ completedRiemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 (Or.inl hs) hs'
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ₀`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ₀(1 - s) = Λ₀ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta₀ (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero, ← completedCosZeta₀_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub]
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ (1 - s) = Λ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero, ← completedCosZeta_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub]
/-- The residue of `Λ(s)` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedRiemannZeta_residue_one :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedRiemannZeta s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one 0
/-!
## The un-completed Riemann zeta function
-/
/-- The Riemann zeta function `ζ(s)`. -/
def riemannZeta := hurwitzZetaEven 0
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZetaEven_zero : hurwitzZetaEven 0 = riemannZeta := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.cosZeta_zero : cosZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
simp_rw [cosZeta, riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, if_true, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero,
completedCosZeta_zero]
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZeta_zero : hurwitzZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
simpa [hurwitzZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_zero] using hurwitzZetaOdd_neg 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.expZeta_zero : expZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
rw [expZeta, cosZeta_zero, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro I_ne_zero, false_or,
← eq_neg_self_iff, ← sinZeta_neg, neg_zero]
/-- The Riemann zeta function is differentiable away from `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_riemannZeta {s : ℂ} (hs' : s ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ riemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven _ hs'
/-- We have `ζ(0) = -1 / 2`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_zero : riemannZeta 0 = -1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_self, if_true]
lemma riemannZeta_def_of_ne_zero {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
riemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta s / Gammaℝ s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne hs, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the zeta function. -/
theorem riemannZeta_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one (n : ℕ) : riemannZeta (-2 * (n + 1)) = 0 :=
hurwitzZetaEven_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one 0 n
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `ζ`: if `1 - s ∉ ℕ`, then we have
| `ζ (1 - s) = 2 ^ (1 - s) * π ^ (-s) * Γ s * sin (π * (1 - s) / 2) * ζ s`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_one_sub {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ n : ℕ, s ≠ -n) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/RiemannZeta.lean | 149 | 150 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Span
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules, we construct the lattice structure on Lie submodules and we
use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule`
* `LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian`
* `LieSubmodule.lieSpan`
* `LieSubmodule.map`
* `LieSubmodule.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubmodule
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure LieSubmodule extends Submodule R M where
lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier
attribute [nolint docBlame] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
attribute [coe] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R L M}
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
instance : SetLike (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
add_mem {N} _ _ := N.add_mem'
zero_mem N := N.zero_mem'
neg_mem {N} x hx := show -x ∈ N.toSubmodule from neg_mem hx
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (LieSubmodule R L M) R M where
smul_mem {s} c _ h := s.smul_mem' c h
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (0 : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 h]; apply lie_zero }⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance (priority := high) coeSort : CoeSort (LieSubmodule R L M) (Type w) where
coe N := { x : M // x ∈ N }
instance (priority := mid) coeSubmodule : CoeOut (LieSubmodule R L M) (Submodule R M) :=
⟨toSubmodule⟩
instance : CanLift (Submodule R M) (LieSubmodule R L M) (·)
(fun N ↦ ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ N → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N) where
prf N hN := ⟨⟨N, hN⟩, rfl⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((N : Submodule R M) : Set M) = N :=
rfl
theorem mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff' (p : Submodule R M) (h) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨p, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias mem_coeSubmodule := mem_toSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Set M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N :=
zero_mem N
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {x} (h : x ∈ N) : (⟨x, h⟩ : N) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext_iff_val
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSet_mk (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R M) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem := h } : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_mk := toSubmodule_mk
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M → Submodule R M) := fun x y h ↦ by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_injective := toSubmodule_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_inj : (N : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_inj := toSubmodule_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toSubmodule_eq_iff := toSubmodule_inj
/-- Copy of a `LieSubmodule` with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by simp [hs]
add_mem' x y := by rw [hs] at x y ⊢; exact N.add_mem' x y
smul_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem'
lie_mem := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance : LieRingModule L N where
bracket (x : L) (m : N) := ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩
add_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply add_lie
lie_add := by intro x m n; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_add
leibniz_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply leibniz_lie
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) :
(↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ :=
rfl
-- Copying instances from `Submodule` for correct discrimination keys
instance [IsNoetherian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsNoetherian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsNoetherian R N.toSubmodule
instance [IsArtinian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsArtinian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsArtinian R N.toSubmodule
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| NoZeroSMulDivisors R N.toSubmodule
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
instance instLieModule : LieModule R L N where
lie_smul := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_smul
smul_lie := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply smul_lie
instance [Subsingleton M] : Unique (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨⟨0⟩, fun _ ↦ (toSubmodule_inj _ _).mp (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
end LieSubmodule
variable {R M}
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R M) :
(∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨N, rfl⟩ _ _; exact N.lie_mem
· intro h; use { p with lie_mem := @h }
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable {L}
variable [LieAlgebra R L]
variable (K : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def toLieSubmodule : LieSubmodule R K L :=
{ (K : Submodule R L) with lie_mem := fun {x _} hy ↦ K.lie_mem x.property hy }
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLieSubmodule : (K.toLieSubmodule : Submodule R L) = K := rfl
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem mem_toLieSubmodule (x : L) : x ∈ K.toLieSubmodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
end LieSubalgebra
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
section LatticeStructure
open Set
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubmodule R L M → Set M) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule : (N : Submodule R M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N' :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule := toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule
instance : Bot (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instUniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M)
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubmodule : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias bot_coeSubmodule := bot_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_bot : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_bot_iff := toSubmodule_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_bot_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot (x : M) : x ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x = 0 :=
mem_singleton_iff
instance : Top (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submodule R M) with lie_mem := fun {x m} _ ↦ mem_univ ⁅x, m⁆ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias top_coeSubmodule := top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_top_iff := toSubmodule_eq_top
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_top_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
mem_univ x
instance : Min (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N N' ↦
{ (N ⊓ N' : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun h ↦ mem_inter (N.lie_mem h.1) (N'.lie_mem h.2) }⟩
instance : InfSet (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ toSubmodule := sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S}
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
simp only [Submodule.mem_carrier, mem_iInter, Submodule.sInf_coe, mem_setOf_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, forall_exists_index, and_imp] at h ⊢
intro N hN; apply N.lie_mem (h N hN) }⟩
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : (↑(N ⊓ N') : Set M) = ↑N ∩ ↑N' :=
rfl
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊓ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊓ (N' : Submodule R M) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias inf_coe_toSubmodule := inf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule := sInf_toSubmodule
theorem sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sInf_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sInf_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule' := sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨅ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_toSubmodule]; ext; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iInf_coe_toSubmodule := iInf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, sInf_toSubmodule, Submodule.sInf_coe]
ext m
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp,
and_imp, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
instance : Max (LieSubmodule R L M) where
max N N' :=
{ toSubmodule := (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
lie_mem := by
rintro x m (hm : m ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M))
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at hm ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hm
exact ⟨⁅x, y⁆, N.lie_mem hy, ⁅x, z⁆, N'.lie_mem hz, (lie_add _ _ _).symm⟩ }
instance : SupSet (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sSup S :=
{ toSubmodule := sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
lie_mem := by
intro x m (hm : m ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S})
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
obtain ⟨s, hs, hsm⟩ := Submodule.mem_sSup_iff_exists_finset.mp hm
clear hm
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on generalizing m with
| empty =>
replace hsm : m = 0 := by simpa using hsm
simp [hsm]
| insert q t hqt ih =>
rw [Finset.iSup_insert] at hsm
obtain ⟨m', hm', u, hu, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp hsm
rw [lie_add]
refine add_mem ?_ (ih (Subset.trans (by simp) hs) hu)
obtain ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ : ∃ p ∈ S, ↑p = q := hs (Finset.mem_insert_self q t)
suffices p ≤ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S} by exact this (p.lie_mem hm')
exact le_sSup ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem sup_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊔ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sup_coe_toSubmodule := sup_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sSup_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = sSup {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule := sSup_toSubmodule
theorem sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sSup_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sSup_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule' := sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨆ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iSup, sSup_toSubmodule]; ext; simp [Submodule.mem_sSup, Submodule.mem_iSup]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iSup_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_toSubmodule
/-- The set of Lie submodules of a Lie module form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
{ toSubmodule_injective.completeLattice toSubmodule sup_toSubmodule inf_toSubmodule
sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf rfl rfl with
toPartialOrder := SetLike.instPartialOrder }
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι} {b : M} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ N i) :
b ∈ ⨆ i, N i :=
(le_iSup N i) h
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma iSup_induction {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : M → Prop} {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (mem : ∀ i, ∀ y ∈ N i, motive y) (zero : motive 0)
(add : ∀ y z, motive y → motive z → motive (y + z)) : motive x := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule] at hx
exact Submodule.iSup_induction (motive := motive) (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) hx mem zero add
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iSup_induction' {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : (x : M) → (x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (i) (x) (hx : x ∈ N i), motive x (mem_iSup_of_mem i hx)) (zero : motive 0 (zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, motive x hx → motive y hy → motive (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) : motive x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (hc : motive x hx) => hc
refine iSup_induction N (motive := fun x : M ↦ ∃ (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i), motive x hx) hx
(fun i x hx => ?_) ?_ fun x y => ?_
· exact ⟨_, mem _ _ hx⟩
· exact ⟨_, zero⟩
· rintro ⟨_, Cx⟩ ⟨_, Cy⟩
exact ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ Cx Cy⟩
variable {N N'}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_toSubmodule :
Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Disjoint N N' := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, inf_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule,
← disjoint_iff]
@[deprecated disjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem disjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Disjoint N N' ↔ Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := disjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := disjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma codisjoint_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Codisjoint N N' := by
rw [codisjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, sup_toSubmodule,
top_toSubmodule, ← codisjoint_iff]
@[deprecated codisjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint N N' ↔ Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) :=
codisjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias codisjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma isCompl_toSubmodule :
IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ IsCompl N N' := by
simp [isCompl_iff]
@[deprecated isCompl_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem isCompl_iff_toSubmodule :
IsCompl N N' ↔ IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := isCompl_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias isCompl_iff_coe_toSubmodule := isCompl_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma iSupIndep_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
iSupIndep (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) ↔ iSupIndep N := by
simp [iSupIndep_def, ← disjoint_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated iSupIndep_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
iSupIndep N ↔ iSupIndep fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M) := iSupIndep_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias iSupIndep_iff_coe_toSubmodule := iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias independent_iff_toSubmodule := iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias independent_iff_coe_toSubmodule := independent_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, N i = ⊤ := by
rw [← iSup_toSubmodule, ← top_toSubmodule (L := L), toSubmodule_inj]
@[deprecated iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem iSup_eq_top_iff_toSubmodule {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, N i = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ := iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias iSup_eq_top_iff_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_eq_top_iff_toSubmodule
instance : Add (LieSubmodule R L M) where add := max
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) where zero := ⊥
instance : AddCommMonoid (LieSubmodule R L M) where
add_assoc := sup_assoc
zero_add := bot_sup_eq
add_zero := sup_bot_eq
add_comm := sup_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec
variable (N N')
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup : N + N' = N ⊔ N' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊓ N' ↔ x ∈ N ∧ x ∈ N' := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule,
Submodule.mem_inf]
theorem mem_sup (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊔ N' ↔ ∃ y ∈ N, ∃ z ∈ N', y + z = x := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, sup_toSubmodule, Submodule.mem_sup]; exact Iff.rfl
nonrec theorem eq_bot_iff : N = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m : M, m ∈ N → m = 0 := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact Iff.rfl
instance subsingleton_of_bot : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)) := by
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top
ext ⟨_, hx⟩
simp only [mem_bot, mk_eq_zero, mem_top, iff_true]
exact hx
instance : IsModularLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _ _ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule, sup_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule]
exact IsModularLattice.sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _
variable (R L M)
/-- The natural functor that forgets the action of `L` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps] def toSubmodule_orderEmbedding : LieSubmodule R L M ↪o Submodule R M :=
{ toFun := (↑)
inj' := toSubmodule_injective
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl }
instance wellFoundedGT_of_noetherian [IsNoetherian R M] : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).dual.ltEmbedding
theorem wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian [IsArtinian R M] : WellFoundedLT (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).ltEmbedding
instance [IsArtinian R M] : IsAtomic (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt <| (wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M).wf
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton M :=
have h : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton (Submodule R M) := by
rw [← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← toSubmodule_inj,
top_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule]
h.trans <| Submodule.subsingleton_iff R
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Nontrivial M :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans <| subsingleton_iff R L M).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
instance [Nontrivial M] : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
(nontrivial_iff R L M).mpr ‹_›
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot {N : LieSubmodule R L M} : Nontrivial N ↔ N ≠ ⊥ := by
constructor <;> contrapose!
· rintro rfl
⟨⟨m₁, h₁ : m₁ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, ⟨m₂, h₂ : m₂ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, h₁₂⟩
simp [(LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₁, (LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₂] at h₁₂
· rw [not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff]
rintro ⟨h⟩ m hm
simpa using h ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨_, N.zero_mem⟩
variable {R L M}
section InclusionMaps
/-- The inclusion of a Lie submodule into its ambient space is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def incl : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ Submodule.subtype (N : Submodule R M) with map_lie' := fun {_ _} ↦ rfl }
@[simp]
theorem incl_coe : (N.incl : N →ₗ[R] M) = (N : Submodule R M).subtype :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem incl_apply (m : N) : N.incl m = m :=
rfl
theorem incl_eq_val : (N.incl : N → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem injective_incl : Function.Injective N.incl := Subtype.coe_injective
variable {N N'}
variable (h : N ≤ N')
/-- Given two nested Lie submodules `N ⊆ N'`,
the inclusion `N ↪ N'` is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def inclusion : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N' where
__ := Submodule.inclusion (show N.toSubmodule ≤ N'.toSubmodule from h)
map_lie' := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion (m : N) : (inclusion h m : M) = m :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_apply (m : N) : inclusion h m = ⟨m.1, h m.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_injective : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := fun x y ↦ by
simp only [inclusion_apply, imp_self, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
end InclusionMaps
section LieSpan
variable (R L) (s : Set M)
/-- The `lieSpan` of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest Lie submodule of `M` that contains `s`. -/
def lieSpan : LieSubmodule R L M :=
sInf { N | s ⊆ N }
variable {R L s}
theorem mem_lieSpan {x : M} : x ∈ lieSpan R L s ↔ ∀ N : LieSubmodule R L M, s ⊆ N → x ∈ N := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, lieSpan, sInf_coe]
exact mem_iInter₂
theorem subset_lieSpan : s ⊆ lieSpan R L s := by
intro m hm
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN
exact hN hm
theorem submodule_span_le_lieSpan : Submodule.span R s ≤ lieSpan R L s := by
rw [Submodule.span_le]
apply subset_lieSpan
@[simp]
theorem lieSpan_le {N} : lieSpan R L s ≤ N ↔ s ⊆ N := by
constructor
· exact Subset.trans subset_lieSpan
· intro hs m hm; rw [mem_lieSpan] at hm; exact hm _ hs
theorem lieSpan_mono {t : Set M} (h : s ⊆ t) : lieSpan R L s ≤ lieSpan R L t := by
rw [lieSpan_le]
exact Subset.trans h subset_lieSpan
theorem lieSpan_eq (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : lieSpan R L (N : Set M) = N :=
le_antisymm (lieSpan_le.mpr rfl.subset) subset_lieSpan
theorem coe_lieSpan_submodule_eq_iff {p : Submodule R M} :
(lieSpan R L (p : Set M) : Submodule R M) = p ↔ ∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p := by
rw [p.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff L]; constructor <;> intro h
· intro x m hm; rw [← h, mem_toSubmodule]; exact lie_mem _ (subset_lieSpan hm)
· rw [← toSubmodule_mk p @h, coe_toSubmodule, toSubmodule_inj, lieSpan_eq]
variable (R L M)
/-- `lieSpan` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from `LieSubmodule` to `Set`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (lieSpan R L : Set M → LieSubmodule R L M) (↑) where
choice s _ := lieSpan R L s
gc _ _ := lieSpan_le
le_l_u _ := subset_lieSpan
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : lieSpan R L (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : lieSpan R L (Set.univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_lieSpan
theorem lieSpan_eq_bot_iff : lieSpan R L s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, m = (0 : M) := by
rw [_root_.eq_bot_iff, lieSpan_le, bot_coe, subset_singleton_iff]
variable {M}
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : lieSpan R L (s ∪ t) = lieSpan R L s ⊔ lieSpan R L t :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_sup
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : lieSpan R L (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, lieSpan R L (s i) :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_iSup
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for 0 and all elements of `s`, and is
preserved under addition, scalar multiplication and the Lie bracket, then `p` holds for all
elements of the Lie submodule spanned by `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem lieSpan_induction {p : (x : M) → x ∈ lieSpan R L s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_lieSpan h))
(zero : p 0 (LieSubmodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul : ∀ (a : R) (x hx), p x hx → p (a • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx)) {x}
(lie : ∀ (x : L) (y hy), p y hy → p (⁅x, y⁆) (LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ ‹_›))
(hx : x ∈ lieSpan R L s) : p x hx := by
let p : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
add_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hpx⟩
lie_mem := fun ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, lie _ _ _ hpy⟩ }
exact lieSpan_le (N := p) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_lieSpan hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
lemma isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton (m : M) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement (lieSpan R L {m}) := by
rw [CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le]
intro s hne hdir hsup
replace hsup : m ∈ (↑(sSup s) : Set M) := (SetLike.le_def.mp hsup) (subset_lieSpan rfl)
suffices (↑(sSup s) : Set M) = ⋃ N ∈ s, ↑N by
obtain ⟨N : LieSubmodule R L M, hN : N ∈ s, hN' : m ∈ N⟩ := by
simp_rw [this, Set.mem_iUnion, SetLike.mem_coe, exists_prop] at hsup; assumption
exact ⟨N, hN, by simpa⟩
replace hne : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hne
have := Submodule.coe_iSup_of_directed _ hdir.directed_val
simp_rw [← iSup_toSubmodule, Set.iUnion_coe_set, coe_toSubmodule] at this
rw [← this, SetLike.coe_set_eq, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_subtype]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton : sSup ((fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N) = N := by
refine le_antisymm (sSup_le <| by simp) ?_
simp_rw [← toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule, sSup_toSubmodule, Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe]
refine fun m hm ↦ Submodule.mem_sSup.mpr fun N' hN' ↦ ?_
replace hN' : ∀ m ∈ N, lieSpan R L {m} ≤ N' := by simpa using hN'
exact hN' _ hm (subset_lieSpan rfl)
instance instIsCompactlyGenerated : IsCompactlyGenerated (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N ↦ ⟨(fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N, fun _ ⟨m, _, hm⟩ ↦
hm ▸ isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton R L m, N.sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton⟩⟩
end LieSpan
end LatticeStructure
end LieSubmodule
section LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {L' : Type w₂} {M : Type w} {M' : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieRing L'] [LieAlgebra R L']
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') (N N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) (N' : LieSubmodule R L M')
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pushes forward Lie submodules of `M` to Lie submodules
of `M'`. -/
def map : LieSubmodule R L M' :=
{ (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m'} h ↦ by
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hfm⟩; use ⁅x, m⁆; constructor
· apply N.lie_mem hm
· norm_cast at hfm; simp [hfm] }
@[simp] theorem coe_map : (N.map f : Set M') = f '' N := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_map : (N.map f : Submodule R M') = (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_map := toSubmodule_map
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pulls back Lie submodules of `M'` to Lie submodules of
`M`. -/
def comap : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
suffices ⁅x, f m⁆ ∈ N' by simp [this]
apply N'.lie_mem h }
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_comap :
(N'.comap f : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_comap := toSubmodule_comap
variable {f N N₂ N'}
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f N ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ comap f N' :=
Set.image_subset_iff
variable (f) in
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem map_inf_le : (N ⊓ N₂).map f ≤ N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_inter_subset f N N₂
theorem map_inf (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(N ⊓ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
@[simp]
theorem map_sup : (N ⊔ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊔ N₂.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf {N₂' : LieSubmodule R L M'} :
(N' ⊓ N₂').comap f = N'.comap f ⊓ N₂'.comap f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(⨆ i, N i).map f = ⨆ i, (N i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_map (m' : M') : m' ∈ N.map f ↔ ∃ m, m ∈ N ∧ f m = m' :=
Submodule.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {m : M} (h : m ∈ N) : f m ∈ N.map f :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {m : M} : m ∈ comap f N' ↔ f m ∈ N' :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_incl_eq_top : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊤ ↔ N ≤ N₂ := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_comap, LieSubmodule.incl_coe,
LieSubmodule.top_toSubmodule, Submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top, toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule]
theorem comap_incl_eq_bot : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊥ ↔ N ⊓ N₂ = ⊥ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_comap, incl_coe, bot_toSubmodule,
inf_toSubmodule]
rw [← Submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot, disjoint_iff]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem map_mono (h : N ≤ N₂) : N.map f ≤ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_subset _ h
theorem map_comp
{M'' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M''] [Module R M''] [LieRingModule L M''] {g : M' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M''} :
N.map (g.comp f) = (N.map f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [← Set.image_comp, coe_map, LinearMap.coe_comp, LieModuleHom.coe_comp]
@[simp]
theorem map_id : N.map LieModuleHom.id = N := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem map_bot :
(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).map f = ⊥ := by
ext m; simp [eq_comm]
lemma map_le_map_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) :
N.map f ≤ N₂.map f ↔ N ≤ N₂ :=
Set.image_subset_image_iff hf
lemma map_injective_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f) := fun {N N'} h ↦
SetLike.coe_injective <| hf.image_injective <| by simp only [← coe_map, h]
/-- An injective morphism of Lie modules embeds the lattice of submodules of the domain into that
of the target. -/
@[simps] def mapOrderEmbedding {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
LieSubmodule R L M ↪o LieSubmodule R L M' where
toFun := LieSubmodule.map f
inj' := map_injective_of_injective hf
map_rel_iff' := Set.image_subset_image_iff hf
variable (N) in
/-- For an injective morphism of Lie modules, any Lie submodule is equivalent to its image. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (hf : Function.Injective f) :
N ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N.map f :=
{ Submodule.equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') hf N with
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to specify `invFun` explicitly this way, otherwise we'd get a type mismatch
invFun := by exact DFunLike.coe (Submodule.equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') hf N).symm
map_lie' := by rintro x ⟨m, hm : m ∈ N⟩; ext; exact f.map_lie x m }
/-- An equivalence of Lie modules yields an order-preserving equivalence of their lattices of Lie
Submodules. -/
@[simps] def orderIsoMapComap (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
LieSubmodule R L M ≃o LieSubmodule R L M' where
toFun := map e
invFun := comap e
left_inv := fun N ↦ by ext; simp
right_inv := fun N ↦ by ext; simp [e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
map_rel_iff' := fun {_ _} ↦ Set.image_subset_image_iff e.injective
end LieSubmodule
end LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
namespace LieModuleHom
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {N : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [LieRingModule L N]
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N)
/-- The kernel of a morphism of Lie algebras, as an ideal in the domain. -/
def ker : LieSubmodule R L M :=
LieSubmodule.comap f ⊥
@[simp]
theorem ker_toSubmodule : (f.ker : Submodule R M) = LinearMap.ker (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias ker_coeSubmodule := ker_toSubmodule
theorem ker_eq_bot : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ Function.Injective f := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, ker_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.bot_toSubmodule,
LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, coe_toLinearMap]
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ker {m : M} : m ∈ f.ker ↔ f m = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_id : (LieModuleHom.id : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M).ker = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_ker_incl : f.comp f.ker.incl = 0 := by ext ⟨m, hm⟩; exact mem_ker.mp hm
theorem le_ker_iff_map (M' : LieSubmodule R L M) : M' ≤ f.ker ↔ LieSubmodule.map f M' = ⊥ := by
rw [ker, eq_bot_iff, LieSubmodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
variable (f)
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` is a Lie submodule of `N`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range : LieSubmodule R L N :=
(LieSubmodule.map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_range : f.range = Set.range f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_range : f.range = LinearMap.range (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_range := toSubmodule_range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (n : N) : n ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ m, f m = n :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_top : LieSubmodule.map f ⊤ = f.range := by ext; simp [LieSubmodule.mem_map]
theorem range_eq_top : f.range = ⊤ ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_range, LieSubmodule.top_coe, Set.range_eq_univ]
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` whose values lie in a Lie submodule `P ⊆ N` can be
restricted to a morphism of Lie modules `M → P`. -/
def codRestrict (P : LieSubmodule R L N) (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (h : ∀ m, f m ∈ P) :
M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P where
toFun := f.toLinearMap.codRestrict P h
__ := f.toLinearMap.codRestrict P h
map_lie' {x m} := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma codRestrict_apply (P : LieSubmodule R L N) (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (h : ∀ m, f m ∈ P) (m : M) :
(f.codRestrict P h m : N) = f m :=
rfl
end LieModuleHom
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
@[simp]
theorem ker_incl : N.incl.ker = ⊥ := (LieModuleHom.ker_eq_bot N.incl).mpr <| injective_incl N
@[simp]
theorem range_incl : N.incl.range = N := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, LieModuleHom.toSubmodule_range, incl_coe]
rw [Submodule.range_subtype]
@[simp]
theorem comap_incl_self : comap N.incl N = ⊤ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_comap, incl_coe, top_toSubmodule]
rw [Submodule.comap_subtype_self]
theorem map_incl_top : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L N).map N.incl = N := by simp
variable {N}
@[simp]
lemma map_le_range {M' : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
N.map f ≤ f.range := by
rw [← LieModuleHom.map_top]
exact LieSubmodule.map_mono le_top
@[simp]
lemma map_incl_lt_iff_lt_top {N' : LieSubmodule R L N} :
N'.map (LieSubmodule.incl N) < N ↔ N' < ⊤ := by
convert (LieSubmodule.mapOrderEmbedding (f := N.incl) Subtype.coe_injective).lt_iff_lt
simp
@[simp]
lemma map_incl_le {N' : LieSubmodule R L N} :
N'.map N.incl ≤ N := by
conv_rhs => rw [← N.map_incl_top]
exact LieSubmodule.map_mono le_top
end LieSubmodule
section TopEquiv
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie submodule and the enclosing Lie module. -/
def LieModuleEquiv.ofTop : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ LinearEquiv.ofTop ⊤ rfl with
map_lie' := rfl }
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Submodule.lean | 1,060 | 1,060 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft_symm (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv = (λ_ X).inv ≫ _ ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f = (λ_ X).inv ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ f ≫ (λ_ X').hom := by
simp only [id_whiskerLeft, assoc, inv_hom_id, comp_id, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f ≫ (ρ_ X').inv = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ _ := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ◁ f = 𝟙_ C ◁ g ↔ f = g := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f ▷ 𝟙_ C = g ▷ 𝟙_ C ↔ f = g := by simp
/-! The lemmas in the next section are true by coherence,
but we prove them directly as they are used in proving the coherence theorem. -/
section
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom :
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (X Y : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv ≫ ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y) = X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom := by
rw [← triangle, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ X).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).hom = X ◁ (λ_ Y).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (X Y : C) :
(X ◁ (λ_ Y).inv) ≫ (α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv = (ρ_ X).inv ▷ Y := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y)]
/-- We state it as a simp lemma, which is regarded as an involved version of
`id_whiskerRight X Y : 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y)`.
-/
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_whiskerRight (X Y : C) :
(λ_ X).hom ▷ Y = (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).hom ≫ (λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, whiskerLeft_comp, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ←
cancel_epi ((α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _), pentagon_assoc, triangle, ← associator_naturality_middle, ←
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, triangle, associator_naturality_left]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight (X Y : C) :
(λ_ X).inv ▷ Y = (λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv ≫ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor (X Y : C) :
X ◁ (ρ_ Y).hom = (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).inv ≫ (ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv, ←
cancel_epi (X ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv), pentagon_inv_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right, ←
associator_inv_naturality_middle, ← whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right,
associator_inv_naturality_right]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv (X Y : C) :
X ◁ (ρ_ Y).inv = (ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_tensor (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom = (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).inv ≫ (λ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_tensor_inv (X Y : C) :
(λ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv = (λ_ X).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ (𝟙_ C) X Y).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_tensor (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).hom = (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).hom ≫ X ◁ (ρ_ Y).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_tensor_inv (X Y : C) :
(ρ_ (X ⊗ Y)).inv = X ◁ (ρ_ Y).inv ≫ (α_ X Y (𝟙_ C)).inv := by simp
end
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(f ⊗ g ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ ((f ⊗ g) ⊗ h) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem associator_conjugation {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
(f ⊗ g) ⊗ h = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (f ⊗ g ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').inv := by
rw [associator_inv_naturality, hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_conjugation {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (g : Y ⟶ Y') (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
f ⊗ g ⊗ h = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ ((f ⊗ g) ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X' Y' Z').hom := by
rw [associator_naturality, inv_hom_id_assoc]
-- TODO these next two lemmas aren't so fundamental, and perhaps could be removed
-- (replacing their usages by their proofs).
@[reassoc]
theorem id_tensor_associator_naturality {X Y Z Z' : C} (h : Z ⟶ Z') :
| (𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ h) ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (𝟙 X ⊗ 𝟙 Y ⊗ h) := by
rw [← tensor_id, associator_naturality]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 634 | 635 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Control.EquivFunctor
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Equivalences for `Option α`
We define
* `Equiv.optionCongr`: the `Option α ≃ Option β` constructed from `e : α ≃ β` by sending `none` to
`none`, and applying `e` elsewhere.
* `Equiv.removeNone`: the `α ≃ β` constructed from `Option α ≃ Option β` by removing `none` from
both sides.
-/
universe u
namespace Equiv
open Option
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section OptionCongr
/-- A universe-polymorphic version of `EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Option α ≃ Option β where
toFun := Option.map e
invFun := Option.map e.symm
left_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.symm_comp_self.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
right_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.self_comp_symm.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_refl : optionCongr (Equiv.refl α) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext <| congr_fun Option.map_id
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) : (optionCongr e).symm = optionCongr e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) :
(optionCongr e₁).trans (optionCongr e₂) = optionCongr (e₁.trans e₂) :=
ext <| Option.map_map _ _
/-- When `α` and `β` are in the same universe, this is the same as the result of
`EquivFunctor.mapEquiv`. -/
theorem optionCongr_eq_equivFunctor_mapEquiv {α β : Type u} (e : α ≃ β) :
optionCongr e = EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e :=
rfl
end OptionCongr
section RemoveNone
variable (e : Option α ≃ Option β)
/-- If we have a value on one side of an `Equiv` of `Option`
we also have a value on the other side of the equivalence
-/
def removeNone_aux (x : α) : β :=
if h : (e (some x)).isSome then Option.get _ h
else
Option.get _ <|
show (e none).isSome by
rw [← Option.ne_none_iff_isSome]
intro hn
rw [Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none, ← hn] at h
exact Option.some_ne_none _ (e.injective h)
theorem removeNone_aux_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e (some x) := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.isSome_iff_exists.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e none := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_inv (x : α) : removeNone_aux e.symm (removeNone_aux e x) = x :=
Option.some_injective _
(by
cases h1 : e.symm (some (removeNone_aux e x)) <;> cases h2 : e (some x)
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h1]
exact (e.eq_symm_apply.mpr h2).symm
· rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h2⟩] at h1
simp at h1
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h2] at h1
simp at h1
· rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h1⟩]
rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h2⟩]
simp)
/-- Given an equivalence between two `Option` types, eliminate `none` from that equivalence by
mapping `e.symm none` to `e none`. -/
def removeNone : α ≃ β where
toFun := removeNone_aux e
invFun := removeNone_aux e.symm
left_inv := removeNone_aux_inv e
right_inv := removeNone_aux_inv e.symm
@[simp]
theorem removeNone_symm : (removeNone e).symm = removeNone e.symm :=
rfl
theorem removeNone_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone e x) = e (some x) :=
removeNone_aux_some e h
theorem removeNone_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) : some (removeNone e x) = e none :=
removeNone_aux_none e h
@[simp]
theorem option_symm_apply_none_iff : e.symm none = none ↔ e none = none :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using (congr_arg e h).symm, fun h => by simpa using (congr_arg e.symm h).symm⟩
theorem some_removeNone_iff {x : α} : some (removeNone e x) = e none ↔ e.symm none = some x := by
rcases h : e (some x) with a | a
· rw [removeNone_none _ h]
simpa using (congr_arg e.symm h).symm
· rw [removeNone_some _ ⟨a, h⟩]
have h1 := congr_arg e.symm h
rw [symm_apply_apply] at h1
simp only [apply_eq_iff_eq, reduceCtorEq]
simp [h1, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem removeNone_optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : removeNone e.optionCongr = e :=
Equiv.ext fun x => Option.some_injective _ <| removeNone_some _ ⟨e x, by simp [EquivFunctor.map]⟩
end RemoveNone
theorem optionCongr_injective : Function.Injective (optionCongr : α ≃ β → Option α ≃ Option β) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective removeNone_optionCongr
|
/-- Equivalences between `Option α` and `β` that send `none` to `x` are equivalent to
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Option.lean | 144 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.symm.trans hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Subgroup.zpowers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`Subgroup.zmultiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`."]
noncomputable def finEquivZPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Fin (orderOf x) ≃ zpowers x :=
(finEquivPowers hx).trans <| Equiv.setCongr hx.powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivZPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_symm_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivZPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩ =
⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [finEquivZPowers, Equiv.symm_trans_apply]; exact finEquivPowers_symm_apply _ n
end Group
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid G] {x y : G}
/-- Elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mul (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) : IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
(Commute.all x y).isOfFinOrder_mul hx hy
end CommMonoid
section FiniteMonoid
variable [Monoid G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_card_orderOf_eq_card_pow_eq_one [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ m ∈ divisors n, #{x : G | orderOf x = m} = #{x : G | x ^ n = 1} := by
refine (Finset.card_biUnion ?_).symm.trans ?_
· simp +contextual [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff]
· congr; ext; simp [hn, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card_univ [Fintype G] : orderOf x ≤ Fintype.card G :=
Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range (x ^ ·) (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _) pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card [Finite G] : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨⟩ := nonempty_fintype G
simpa using orderOf_le_card_univ
end FiniteMonoid
section FiniteCancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G]
-- TODO: Of course everything also works for `RightCancelMonoid`.
section Finite
variable [Finite G] {x y : G} {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Use this to show that a finite left cancellative monoid is a group.
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_of_finite (x : G) : IsOfFinOrder x := by
by_contra h; exact infinite_not_isOfFinOrder h <| Set.toFinite _
/-- This is the same as `IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit assumption since this
is automatic in case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit
assumption since this is automatic in case of a finite cancellative additive monoid."]
lemma orderOf_pos (x : G) : 0 < orderOf x := (isOfFinOrder_of_finite x).orderOf_pos
/-- This is the same as `orderOf_pow'` and `orderOf_pow''` but with one assumption less which is
automatic in the case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `addOrderOf_nsmul'` and
`addOrderOf_nsmul` but with one assumption less which is automatic in the case of a
finite cancellative additive monoid."]
theorem orderOf_pow (x : G) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).orderOf_pow ..
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' (orderOf_pos x) <| pow_mod_orderOf _
/-- The equivalence between `Submonoid.powers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Submonoid.multiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def powersEquivPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) : powers x ≃ powers y :=
(finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <|
(finCongr h).trans <| finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem powersEquivPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
powersEquivPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, rfl⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, rfl⟩ := by
rw [powersEquivPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq_card_powers : orderOf x = Fintype.card (powers x : Submonoid G) :=
(Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩
end FiniteCancelMonoid
section FiniteGroup
variable [Group G] {x y : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq {n : ℤ} : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq {m n : ℤ} : x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← zpow_sub, zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq, Int.modEq_iff_dvd, Int.modEq_iff_dvd,
zero_sub, neg_sub]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem injective_zpow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : (Injective fun n : ℤ => x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro h ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn.ne' (h <| by simpa using hx)
rwa [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Nat.cast_zero, Int.modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
section Finite
variable [Finite G]
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_zpow_eq_one (x : G) : ∃ (i : ℤ) (_ : i ≠ 0), x ^ (i : ℤ) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨w, hw1, hw2⟩ := isOfFinOrder_of_finite x
refine ⟨w, Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (_root_.ne_of_gt hw1), ?_⟩
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hw2
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers : y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma powers_eq_zpowers (x : G) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Subgroup.zpowers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Subgroup.zmultiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def zpowersEquivZPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) :
Subgroup.zpowers x ≃ Subgroup.zpowers y :=
(finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <| (finCongr h).trans <|
finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zmultiples_equiv_zmultiples_apply]
theorem zpowersEquivZPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
zpowersEquivZPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, zpow_natCast y n⟩ := by
rw [zpowersEquivZPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
/-- See also `Nat.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Nat.card_zmultiples`."]
theorem Fintype.card_zpowers : Fintype.card (zpowers x) = orderOf x :=
(Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_zpowers_le (a : G) {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0)
(ha : a ^ k = 1) : Fintype.card (Subgroup.zpowers a) ≤ k := by
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt ha
open QuotientGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_card : orderOf x ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical
have ft_prod : Fintype ((G ⧸ zpowers x) × zpowers x) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv G groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
have ft_s : Fintype (zpowers x) := @Fintype.prodRight _ _ _ ft_prod _
have ft_cosets : Fintype (G ⧸ zpowers x) :=
@Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (zpowers x).one_mem⟩⟩
have eq₁ : Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_prod :=
@Fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
_ = @Fintype.card _ (@instFintypeProd _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :=
congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
_ = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
@Fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s
have eq₂ : orderOf x = @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
orderOf x = _ := Fintype.card_zpowers.symm
_ = _ := congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Dvd.intro (@Fintype.card (G ⧸ Subgroup.zpowers x) ft_cosets) (by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm])
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (x : G) : orderOf x ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite G
· simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, orderOf_dvd_card]
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, dvd_zero]
@[to_additive]
nonrec lemma Subgroup.orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) :
orderOf x ∣ Nat.card s := by simpa using orderOf_dvd_natCard (⟨x, hx⟩ : s)
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s :=
le_of_dvd (Nat.card_pos_iff.2 <| ⟨s.coe_nonempty.to_subtype, hs.to_subtype⟩) <|
s.orderOf_dvd_natCard hx
@[to_additive]
lemma Submonoid.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Submonoid G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_submonoidPowers]; exact Nat.card_mono hs <| powers_le.2 hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero']
theorem pow_card_eq_one' {G : Type*} [Group G] {x : G} : x ^ Nat.card G = 1 :=
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.mp <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_card_eq_one : x ^ Fintype.card G = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.pow_index_mem {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H] (g : G) :
g ^ index H ∈ H := by rw [← eq_one_iff, QuotientGroup.mk_pow H, index, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n orderOf_dvd_card, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_zsmul]
theorem zpow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Fintype.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 orderOf_dvd_card), zpow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n <|
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, zpow_mod_orderOf]
/-- If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the `n`th power map is a bijection -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the smul by `n` is a bijection"]
noncomputable def powCoprime {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : G ≃ G where
toFun g := g ^ n
invFun g := g ^ (Nat.card G).gcdB n
left_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
right_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul', zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_one {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : powCoprime h 1 = 1 :=
one_pow n
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) {g : G} :
powCoprime h g⁻¹ = (powCoprime h g)⁻¹ :=
inv_pow g n
@[to_additive Nat.Coprime.nsmul_right_bijective]
lemma Nat.Coprime.pow_left_bijective {G} [Group G] (hn : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) :
Bijective (· ^ n : G → G) :=
(powCoprime hn).bijective
/- TODO: Generalise to `Submonoid.powers`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
Finset.image (fun i => x ^ i) (Finset.range (orderOf x)) = (zpowers x : Set G).toFinset := by
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
ext x
rw [Set.mem_toFinset, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf]
/- TODO: Generalise to `Finite` + `CancelMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_card_eq_zero_iff]
theorem pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x ^ gcd n (Fintype.card G) = 1 :=
⟨fun h => pow_gcd_eq_one _ h <| pow_card_eq_one, fun h => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (Fintype.card G)
rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
lemma smul_eq_of_le_smul
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : a ≤ g • a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (le_pow_smul h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
| Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm key h
lemma smul_eq_of_smul_le
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 992 | 996 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma nnnorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖₊ = ‖z‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma enorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ₑ = ‖z‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
instance (priority := 100) : CStarRing K where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| ((norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_conj _)).symm
instance : StarModule ℝ K where
star_smul r a := by
apply RCLike.ext <;> simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im]
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ((q : ℝ) : K) = q := map_nnratCast (algebraMap ℝ K) _
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
natCast_re n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (ofNat(n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
theorem ofNat_mul_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
re (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * re z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, re_ofReal_mul]
theorem ofNat_mul_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
im (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * im z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_intCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_im]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ratCast (n : ℚ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_ratCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : re (q : K) = q := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : im (q : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_im]
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ‖(r : K)‖ = r :=
(norm_ofReal _).trans (abs_of_nonneg h)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖ = n := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast]
exact norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg n)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖₊ = n := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖ = ofNat(n) :=
norm_natCast n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖₊ = ofNat(n) :=
nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖ = 2 := norm_ofNat 2
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖₊ = 2 := nnnorm_ofNat 2
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖ = q := by
rw [← ofReal_nnratCast]; exact norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm]
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) : ‖n • x‖ = n • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using norm_smul (n : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
‖n • x‖₊ = n • ‖x‖₊ := by simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using nnnorm_smul (n : K) x
section NormedField
variable [NormedField E] [CharZero E] [NormedSpace K E]
include K
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖ = q • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using norm_smul (q : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖₊ = q • ‖x‖₊ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using nnnorm_smul (q : K) x
@[bound]
lemma norm_expect_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → E} : ‖𝔼 i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ 𝔼 i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
Finset.le_expect_of_subadditive norm_zero norm_add_le fun _ _ ↦ by rw [norm_nnqsmul K]
end NormedField
theorem mul_self_norm (z : K) : ‖z‖ * ‖z‖ = normSq z := by rw [normSq_eq_def', sq]
attribute [rclike_simps] norm_zero norm_one norm_eq_zero abs_norm norm_inv norm_div
theorem abs_re_le_norm (z : K) : |re z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply re_sq_le_normSq
theorem abs_im_le_norm (z : K) : |im z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply im_sq_le_normSq
theorem norm_re_le_norm (z : K) : ‖re z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_re_le_norm z
theorem norm_im_le_norm (z : K) : ‖im z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_im_le_norm z
theorem re_le_norm (z : K) : re z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_re_le_norm z)).2
theorem im_le_norm (z : K) : im z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_le_norm _)).2
theorem im_eq_zero_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : im a = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_self_norm a, normSq_apply, left_eq_add, mul_self_eq_zero]
using congr_arg (fun z => z * z) ((re_le_norm a).antisymm h)
theorem re_eq_self_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : (re a : K) = a := by
rw [← conj_eq_iff_re, conj_eq_iff_im, im_eq_zero_of_le h]
open IsAbsoluteValue
theorem abs_re_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |re z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_re_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem abs_im_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |im z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_im_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem norm_I_of_ne_zero (hI : (I : K) ≠ 0) : ‖(I : K)‖ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg I) zero_le_one, one_mul, ← norm_mul,
I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI, norm_neg, norm_one]
theorem re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (x : K) : re (x * conj x) = ‖x * conj x‖ := by
rw [mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow]; simp [-map_pow]
theorem norm_sq_re_add_conj (x : K) : ‖x + conj x‖ ^ 2 = re (x + conj x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_conj, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_mul, norm_ofReal, sq_abs, ofReal_re]
theorem norm_sq_re_conj_add (x : K) : ‖conj x + x‖ ^ 2 = re (conj x + x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_comm, norm_sq_re_add_conj]
/-! ### Cauchy sequences -/
theorem isCauSeq_re (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => re (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_re_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
theorem isCauSeq_im (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => im (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_im_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
/-- The real part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqRe (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_re f⟩
/-- The imaginary part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqIm (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_im f⟩
theorem isCauSeq_norm {f : ℕ → K} (hf : IsCauSeq norm f) : IsCauSeq abs (norm ∘ f) := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf ε ε0
⟨i, fun j hj => lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_norm_sub_norm_le _ _) (hi j hj)⟩
end RCLike
section Instances
noncomputable instance Real.instRCLike : RCLike ℝ where
re := AddMonoidHom.id ℝ
im := 0
I := 0
I_re_ax := by simp only [AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
I_mul_I_ax := Or.intro_left _ rfl
re_add_im_ax z := by
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, RingHom.id_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
ofReal_re_ax _ := rfl
ofReal_im_ax _ := rfl
mul_re_ax z w := by simp only [sub_zero, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_ax z w := by simp only [add_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_re_ax z := by simp only [starRingEnd_apply, star_id_of_comm]
conj_im_ax _ := by simp only [neg_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_I_ax := by simp only [RingHom.map_zero, neg_zero]
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := by simp only [sq, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← abs_mul, abs_mul_self z, add_zero,
mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_I_ax _ := by simp only [mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
le_iff_re_im := (and_iff_left rfl).symm
end Instances
namespace RCLike
section Order
open scoped ComplexOrder
variable {z w : K}
theorem lt_iff_re_im : z < w ↔ re z < re w ∧ im z = im w := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, @RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, heq⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, mt (fun hreq => ext hreq hi) heq⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hrn⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, ne_of_apply_ne _ hrn⟩
theorem nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using le_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
| theorem pos_iff : 0 < z ↔ 0 < re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using lt_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 764 | 766 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Dylan MacKenzie, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Power
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Bounds
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.ModEq
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file contains important specific limit computations in (semi-)normed groups/rings/spaces, as
well as such computations in `ℝ` when the natural proof passes through a fact about normed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Asymptotics Topology Nat NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂
(isLittleO_of_tendsto fun _ hn ↦ False.elim <| H.ne' <| pow_eq_zero hn) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
(div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr fun _ ↦ div_pow _ _ _
theorem isBigO_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ h ▸ isBigO_refl _ _) fun h ↦ (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).isBigO
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : |r₁| < |r₂|) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
refine (IsLittleO.of_norm_left ?_).of_norm_right
exact (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
open List in
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
theorem TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
TFAE
[∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a < R, ∃ C : ℝ, (0 < C ∨ 0 < R) ∧ ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n, ∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n] := by
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have 1 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
tfae_have 3 → 2
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩
tfae_have 2 → 4 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have 4 → 6
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le] using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne')
tfae_have 6 → 5 := fun ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, C, Or.inl H₀, H⟩
tfae_have 5 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩ => by
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n) with (rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩)
· obtain rfl : f = 0 := by
ext n
simpa using H n
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or] at h₀
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, isBigO_zero _ _⟩
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
isBigO_of_le' _ fun n ↦ (H n).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le⟩
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have 2 → 8
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn
tfae_have 8 → 7 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩
tfae_have 7 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, A ⟨?_, ha⟩, .of_norm_eventuallyLE H⟩
exact nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans)
tfae_finish
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 1 < r) : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
have : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ ↦ x ^ k) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
((continuous_id.pow k).tendsto' (1 : ℝ) 1 (one_pow _)).mono_left inf_le_left
obtain ⟨r' : ℝ, hr' : r' ^ k < r, h1 : 1 < r'⟩ :=
((this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hr)).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have h0 : 0 ≤ r' := zero_le_one.trans h1.le
suffices (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =O[atTop] fun n : ℕ ↦ (r' ^ k) ^ n from
this.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (pow_nonneg h0 _) hr')
conv in (r' ^ _) ^ _ => rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul]
suffices ∀ n : ℕ, ‖(n : R)‖ ≤ (r' - 1)⁻¹ * ‖(1 : R)‖ * ‖r' ^ n‖ from
(isBigO_of_le' _ this).pow _
intro n
rw [mul_right_comm]
refine n.norm_cast_le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _))
simpa [_root_.div_eq_inv_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h0] using n.cast_le_pow_div_sub h1
/-- For a real `r > 1` we have `n = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
((↑) : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt R _ 1 _ hr
/-- If `‖r₁‖ < r₂`, then for any natural `k` we have `n ^ k r₁ ^ n = o (r₂ ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ)
{r₁ : R} {r₂ : ℝ} (h : ‖r₁‖ < r₂) :
(fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k * r₁ ^ n : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
by_cases h0 : r₁ = 0
· refine (isLittleO_zero _ _).congr' (mem_atTop_sets.2 <| ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩) EventuallyEq.rfl
simp [zero_pow (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 hn), h0]
rw [← Ne, ← norm_pos_iff] at h0
have A : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ (r₂ / ‖r₁‖) ^ n :=
isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k ((one_lt_div h0).2 h)
suffices (fun n ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ ‖r₁‖ ^ n by
simpa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (pow_pos h0 _).ne', div_pow] using A.mul_isBigO this
exact .of_norm_eventuallyLE <| eventually_norm_pow_le r₁
theorem tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k / r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr).tendsto_div_nhds_zero
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases h0 : r = 0
· exact tendsto_const_nhds.congr'
(mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ by simp [zero_lt_one.trans_le hn |>.ne', h0]⟩)
have hr' : 1 < |r|⁻¹ := (one_lt_inv₀ (abs_pos.2 h0)).2 hr
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr'
/-- For `k ≠ 0` and a constant `r` the function `r / n ^ k` tends to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_const_div_pow (r : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r / n ^ k) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using Filter.Tendsto.const_div_atTop (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop (R := ℝ).comp
(tendsto_pow_atTop hk) ) r
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`.
This is a specialized version of `tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out
for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one k (abs_lt.2 ⟨neg_one_lt_zero.trans_le hr, h'r⟩)
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one 1 hr
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. This is a specialized version of
`tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one 1 hr h'r
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `‖x‖ < 1` tend to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [SeminormedRing R] {x : R}
(h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x)
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h
lemma tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [SeminormedRing R] [NormMulClass R]
{x : R} : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ‖x‖ < 1 := by
-- this proof is slightly fiddly since `‖x ^ n‖ = ‖x‖ ^ n` might not hold for `n = 0`
refine ⟨?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one⟩
rw [← abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), ← tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff,
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
apply Tendsto.congr'
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 1] with n hn
induction n, hn using Nat.le_induction with
| base => simp
| succ n hn IH => simp [norm_pow, pow_succ, IH]
/-! ### Geometric series -/
/-- A normed ring has summable geometric series if, for all `ξ` of norm `< 1`, the geometric series
`∑ ξ ^ n` converges. This holds both in complete normed rings and in normed fields, providing a
convenient abstraction of these two classes to avoid repeating the same proofs. -/
class HasSummableGeomSeries (K : Type*) [NormedRing K] : Prop where
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one : ∀ (ξ : K), ‖ξ‖ < 1 → Summable (fun n ↦ ξ ^ n)
lemma summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {K : Type*} [NormedRing K] [HasSummableGeomSeries K]
{x : K} (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : Summable (fun n ↦ x ^ n) :=
HasSummableGeomSeries.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one x h
instance {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] [CompleteSpace R] : HasSummableGeomSeries R := by
constructor
intro x hx
have h1 : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖x‖ ^ n := summable_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) hx
exact h1.of_norm_bounded_eventually_nat _ (eventually_norm_pow_le x)
section HasSummableGeometricSeries
variable {R : Type*} [NormedRing R]
open NormedSpace
/-- Bound for the sum of a geometric series in a normed ring. This formula does not assume that the
normed ring satisfies the axiom `‖1‖ = 1`. -/
theorem tsum_geometric_le_of_norm_lt_one (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
‖∑' n : ℕ, x ^ n‖ ≤ ‖(1 : R)‖ - 1 + (1 - ‖x‖)⁻¹ := by
by_cases hx : Summable (fun n ↦ x ^ n)
· rw [hx.tsum_eq_zero_add]
simp only [_root_.pow_zero]
refine le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) ?_
have : ‖∑' b : ℕ, (fun n ↦ x ^ (n + 1)) b‖ ≤ (1 - ‖x‖)⁻¹ - 1 := by
refine tsum_of_norm_bounded ?_ fun b ↦ norm_pow_le' _ (Nat.succ_pos b)
convert (hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr (hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg x) h)
simp
linarith
· simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hx]
nontriviality R
have : 1 ≤ ‖(1 : R)‖ := one_le_norm_one R
have : 0 ≤ (1 - ‖x‖) ⁻¹ := inv_nonneg.2 (by linarith)
linarith
variable [HasSummableGeomSeries R]
theorem geom_series_mul_neg (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : (∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 := by
have := (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).hasSum.mul_right (1 - x)
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat ?_
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 - x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h)
convert← this
rw [← geom_sum_mul_neg, Finset.sum_mul]
theorem mul_neg_geom_series (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : (1 - x) * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i = 1 := by
have := (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).hasSum.mul_left (1 - x)
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat ?_
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 - x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h)
convert← this
rw [← mul_neg_geom_sum, Finset.mul_sum]
theorem geom_series_succ (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ (i + 1) = ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i - 1 := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_eq_zero_add,
pow_zero, add_comm]
theorem geom_series_mul_shift (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
x * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i = ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ (i + 1) := by
simp_rw [← (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_mul_left, ← _root_.pow_succ']
theorem geom_series_mul_one_add (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
(1 + x) * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i = 2 * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i - 1 := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul, geom_series_mul_shift x h, geom_series_succ x h, two_mul, add_sub_assoc]
/-- In a normed ring with summable geometric series, a perturbation of `1` by an element `t`
of distance less than `1` from `1` is a unit. Here we construct its `Units` structure. -/
@[simps val]
def Units.oneSub (t : R) (h : ‖t‖ < 1) : Rˣ where
val := 1 - t
inv := ∑' n : ℕ, t ^ n
val_inv := mul_neg_geom_series t h
inv_val := geom_series_mul_neg t h
theorem geom_series_eq_inverse (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
∑' i, x ^ i = Ring.inverse (1 - x) := by
change (Units.oneSub x h) ⁻¹ = Ring.inverse (1 - x)
rw [← Ring.inverse_unit]
rfl
theorem hasSum_geom_series_inverse (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun i ↦ x ^ i) (Ring.inverse (1 - x)) := by
convert (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).hasSum
exact (geom_series_eq_inverse x h).symm
lemma isUnit_one_sub_of_norm_lt_one {x : R} (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : IsUnit (1 - x) :=
⟨Units.oneSub x h, rfl⟩
end HasSummableGeometricSeries
section Geometric
variable {K : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing K] {ξ : K}
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n) (1 - ξ)⁻¹ := by
have xi_ne_one : ξ ≠ 1 := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
have A : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (ξ ^ n - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm]
· simpa [geom_sum_eq, xi_ne_one, neg_inv, div_eq_mul_inv] using A
· simp [norm_pow, summable_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h]
instance : HasSummableGeomSeries K :=
⟨fun _ h ↦ (hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).summable⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, ξ ^ n = (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_eq
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
theorem summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
theorem tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
/-- A geometric series in a normed field is summable iff the norm of the common ratio is less than
one. -/
@[simp]
theorem summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one : (Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n) ↔ ‖ξ‖ < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one⟩
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : dist (ξ ^ k) 0 < 1⟩ :=
(h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)).exists
simp only [norm_pow, dist_zero_right] at hk
rw [← one_pow k] at hk
exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left₀ _ zero_le_one hk
end Geometric
section MulGeometric
variable {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
theorem summable_norm_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {k : ℕ} {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) {u : ℕ → ℕ} (hu : (fun n ↦ (u n : ℝ)) =O[atTop] (fun n ↦ (↑(n ^ k) : ℝ))) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖(u n * r ^ n : R)‖ := by
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hrr', h⟩
rw [← norm_norm] at hrr'
apply summable_of_isBigO_nat (summable_geometric_of_lt_one ((norm_nonneg _).trans hrr'.le) h)
calc
fun n ↦ ‖↑(u n) * r ^ n‖
_ =O[atTop] fun n ↦ u n * ‖r‖ ^ n := by
apply (IsBigOWith.of_bound (c := ‖(1 : R)‖) ?_).isBigO
filter_upwards [eventually_norm_pow_le r] with n hn
simp only [norm_norm, norm_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_cast, norm_pow, abs_norm]
apply (norm_mul_le _ _).trans
have : ‖(u n : R)‖ * ‖r ^ n‖ ≤ (u n * ‖(1 : R)‖) * ‖r‖ ^ n := by
gcongr; exact norm_cast_le (u n)
exact this.trans (le_of_eq (by ring))
_ =O[atTop] fun n ↦ ↑(n ^ k) * ‖r‖ ^ n := hu.mul (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r' ^ n := by
simp only [cast_pow]
exact (isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt k hrr').isBigO
theorem summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖((n : R) ^ k * r ^ n : R)‖ := by
simp only [← cast_pow]
| exact summable_norm_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k := k) (u := fun n ↦ n ^ k) hr
(isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem summable_norm_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖(r ^ n : R)‖ := by
simpa using summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one 0 hr
variable [HasSummableGeomSeries R]
lemma hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one'
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ (n + k).choose k * r ^ n) (Ring.inverse (1 - r) ^ (k + 1)) := by
induction k with
| zero => simpa using hasSum_geom_series_inverse r hr
| succ k ih =>
have I1 : Summable (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ‖(n + k).choose k * r ^ n‖) := by
apply summable_norm_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k := k) hr
apply isBigO_iff.2 ⟨2 ^ k, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop k] with n (hn : k < n)
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_cast, cast_pow, norm_pow]
norm_cast
calc (n + k).choose k
_ ≤ (2 * n).choose k := choose_le_choose k (by omega)
_ ≤ (2 * n) ^ k := Nat.choose_le_pow _ _
_ = 2 ^ k * n ^ k := Nat.mul_pow 2 n k
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Normed.lean | 381 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.SubboxInduction
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Split
/-!
# Filters used in box-based integrals
First we define a structure `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`. This structure will be used as an
argument in the definition of `BoxIntegral.integral` in order to use the same definition for a few
well-known definitions of integrals based on partitions of a rectangular box into subboxes (Riemann
integral, Henstock-Kurzweil integral, and McShane integral).
This structure holds three boolean values (see below), and encodes eight different sets of
parameters; only four of these values are used somewhere in `mathlib4`. Three of them correspond to
the integration theories listed above, and one is a generalization of the one-dimensional
Henstock-Kurzweil integral such that the divergence theorem works without additional integrability
assumptions.
Finally, for each set of parameters `l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` and a rectangular box
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`, we define several `Filter`s that will be used either in the definition of
the corresponding integral, or in the proofs of its properties. We equip
`BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` with a `BoundedOrder` structure such that larger
`IntegrationParams` produce larger filters.
## Main definitions
### Integration parameters
The structure `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` has 3 boolean fields with the following meaning:
* `bRiemann`: the value `true` means that the filter corresponds to a Riemann-style integral, i.e.
in the definition of integrability we require a constant upper estimate `r` on the size of boxes
of a tagged partition; the value `false` means that the estimate may depend on the position of the
tag.
* `bHenstock`: the value `true` means that we require that each tag belongs to its own closed box;
the value `false` means that we only require that tags belong to the ambient box.
* `bDistortion`: the value `true` means that `r` can depend on the maximal ratio of sides of the
same box of a partition. Presence of this case make quite a few proofs harder but we can prove the
divergence theorem only for the filter `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥ =
{bRiemann := false, bHenstock := true, bDistortion := true}`.
### Well-known sets of parameters
Out of eight possible values of `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`, the following four are used in
the library.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.Riemann` (`bRiemann = true`, `bHenstock = true`,
`bDistortion = false`): this value corresponds to the Riemann integral; in the corresponding
filter, we require that the diameters of all boxes `J` of a tagged partition are bounded from
above by a constant upper estimate that may not depend on the geometry of `J`, and each tag
belongs to the corresponding closed box.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.Henstock` (`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = true`,
`bDistortion = false`): this value corresponds to the most natural generalization of
Henstock-Kurzweil integral to higher dimension; the only (but important!) difference between this
theory and Riemann integral is that instead of a constant upper estimate on the size of all boxes
of a partition, we require that the partition is *subordinate* to a possibly discontinuous
function `r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}`, i.e. each box `J` is included in a closed ball with
center `π.tag J` and radius `r J`.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.McShane` (`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = false`,
`bDistortion = false`): this value corresponds to the McShane integral; the only difference with
the Henstock integral is that we allow tags to be outside of their boxes; the tags still have to
be in the ambient closed box, and the partition still has to be subordinate to a function.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥` (`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = true`,
`bDistortion = true`): this is the least integration theory in our list, i.e., all functions
integrable in any other theory is integrable in this one as well. This is a non-standard
generalization of the Henstock-Kurzweil integral to higher dimension. In dimension one, it
generates the same filter as `Henstock`. In higher dimension, this generalization defines an
integration theory such that the divergence of any Fréchet differentiable function `f` is
integrable, and its integral is equal to the sum of integrals of `f` over the faces of the box,
taken with appropriate signs.
A function `f` is `GP`-integrable if for any `ε > 0` and `c : ℝ≥0` there exists
`r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}` such that for any tagged partition `π` subordinate to `r`, if each
tag belongs to the corresponding closed box and for each box `J ∈ π`, the maximal ratio of its
sides is less than or equal to `c`, then the integral sum of `f` over `π` is `ε`-close to the
integral.
### Filters and predicates on `TaggedPrepartition I`
For each value of `IntegrationParams` and a rectangular box `I`, we define a few filters on
`TaggedPrepartition I`. First, we define a predicate
```
structure BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet (l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams)
(I : BoxIntegral.Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ))
(π : BoxIntegral.TaggedPrepartition I) : Prop where
```
This predicate says that
* if `l.bHenstock`, then `π` is a Henstock prepartition, i.e. each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then the distortion of each box in `π` is less than or equal to `c`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then there exists a prepartition `π'` with distortion `≤ c` that covers
exactly `I \ π.iUnion`.
The last condition is always true for `c > 1`, see TODO section for more details.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.RCond` on functions
`r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}`. If `l.bRiemann`, then this predicate requires `r` to be a constant
function, otherwise it imposes no restrictions on `r`. We introduce this definition to prove a few
dot-notation lemmas: e.g., `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.RCond.min` says that the pointwise
minimum of two functions that satisfy this condition satisfies this condition as well.
Then we define four filters on `BoxIntegral.TaggedPrepartition I`.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilterDistortion`: an auxiliary filter that takes parameters
`(l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams) (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)` and returns the
filter generated by all sets `{π | MemBaseSet l I c r π}`, where `r` is a function satisfying
the predicate `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.RCond l`;
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilter l I`: the supremum of `l.toFilterDistortion I c`
over all `c : ℝ≥0`;
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilterDistortioniUnion l I c π₀`, where `π₀` is a
prepartition of `I`: the infimum of `l.toFilterDistortion I c` and the principal filter
generated by `{π | π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion}`;
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion l I π₀`: the supremum of
`l.toFilterDistortioniUnion l I c π₀` over all `c : ℝ≥0`. This is the filter (in the case
`π₀ = ⊤` is the one-box partition of `I`) used in the definition of the integral of a function
over a box.
## Implementation details
* Later we define the integral of a function over a rectangular box as the limit (if it exists) of
the integral sums along `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion l I ⊤`. While it is
possible to define the integral with a general filter on `BoxIntegral.TaggedPrepartition I` as a
parameter, many lemmas (e.g., Sacks-Henstock lemma and most results about integrability of
functions) require the filter to have a predictable structure. So, instead of adding assumptions
about the filter here and there, we define this auxiliary type that can encode all integration
theories we need in practice.
* While the definition of the integral only uses the filter
`BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion l I ⊤` and partitions of a box, some lemmas
(e.g., the Henstock-Sacks lemmas) are best formulated in terms of the predicate `MemBaseSet` and
other filters defined above.
* We use `Bool` instead of `Prop` for the fields of `IntegrationParams` in order to have decidable
equality and inequalities.
## TODO
Currently, `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet` explicitly requires that there exists a
partition of the complement `I \ π.iUnion` with distortion `≤ c`. For `c > 1`, this condition is
always true but the proof of this fact requires more API about
`BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany`. We should formalize this fact, then either require `c > 1`
everywhere, or replace `≤ c` with `< c` so that we automatically get `c > 1` for a non-trivial
prepartition (and consider the special case `π = ⊥` separately if needed).
## Tags
integral, rectangular box, partition, filter
-/
open Set Function Filter Metric Finset Bool
open scoped Topology Filter NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I J : Box ι} {c c₁ c₂ : ℝ≥0}
open TaggedPrepartition
/-- An `IntegrationParams` is a structure holding 3 boolean values used to define a filter to be
used in the definition of a box-integrable function.
* `bRiemann`: the value `true` means that the filter corresponds to a Riemann-style integral, i.e.
in the definition of integrability we require a constant upper estimate `r` on the size of boxes
of a tagged partition; the value `false` means that the estimate may depend on the position of the
tag.
* `bHenstock`: the value `true` means that we require that each tag belongs to its own closed box;
the value `false` means that we only require that tags belong to the ambient box.
* `bDistortion`: the value `true` means that `r` can depend on the maximal ratio of sides of the
same box of a partition. Presence of this case makes quite a few proofs harder but we can prove
the divergence theorem only for the filter `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥ =
{bRiemann := false, bHenstock := true, bDistortion := true}`.
-/
@[ext]
structure IntegrationParams : Type where
(bRiemann bHenstock bDistortion : Bool)
variable {l l₁ l₂ : IntegrationParams}
namespace IntegrationParams
/-- Auxiliary equivalence with a product type used to lift an order. -/
def equivProd : IntegrationParams ≃ Bool × Boolᵒᵈ × Boolᵒᵈ where
toFun l := ⟨l.1, OrderDual.toDual l.2, OrderDual.toDual l.3⟩
invFun l := ⟨l.1, OrderDual.ofDual l.2.1, OrderDual.ofDual l.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
instance : PartialOrder IntegrationParams :=
PartialOrder.lift equivProd equivProd.injective
/-- Auxiliary `OrderIso` with a product type used to lift a `BoundedOrder` structure. -/
def isoProd : IntegrationParams ≃o Bool × Boolᵒᵈ × Boolᵒᵈ :=
⟨equivProd, Iff.rfl⟩
instance : BoundedOrder IntegrationParams :=
isoProd.symm.toGaloisInsertion.liftBoundedOrder
/-- The value `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥`
(`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = true`, `bDistortion = true`)
corresponds to a generalization of the Henstock integral such that the Divergence theorem holds true
without additional integrability assumptions, see the module docstring for details. -/
instance : Inhabited IntegrationParams :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance : DecidableLE (IntegrationParams) :=
fun _ _ => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∧ _))
instance : DecidableEq IntegrationParams :=
fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff _ IntegrationParams.ext_iff.symm
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the Riemann integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the diameters of all boxes `J` of a tagged partition are
bounded from above by a constant upper estimate that may not depend on the geometry of `J`, and each
tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. -/
def Riemann : IntegrationParams where
bRiemann := true
bHenstock := true
bDistortion := false
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r` and each tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. -/
def Henstock : IntegrationParams :=
⟨false, true, false⟩
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the McShane integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r`; the tags may be outside of the corresponding closed box
(but still inside the ambient closed box `I.Icc`). -/
def McShane : IntegrationParams :=
⟨false, false, false⟩
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the generalized Perron integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r` and each tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. We also
require an upper estimate on the distortion of all boxes of the partition. -/
def GP : IntegrationParams := ⊥
theorem henstock_le_riemann : Henstock ≤ Riemann := by trivial
theorem henstock_le_mcShane : Henstock ≤ McShane := by trivial
theorem gp_le : GP ≤ l :=
bot_le
/-- The predicate corresponding to a base set of the filter defined by an
`IntegrationParams`. It says that
* if `l.bHenstock`, then `π` is a Henstock prepartition, i.e. each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then the distortion of each box in `π` is less than or equal to `c`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then there exists a prepartition `π'` with distortion `≤ c` that covers
exactly `I \ π.iUnion`.
The last condition is automatically verified for partitions, and is used in the proof of the
Sacks-Henstock inequality to compare two prepartitions covering the same part of the box.
It is also automatically satisfied for any `c > 1`, see TODO section of the module docstring for
| details. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Filter.lean | 280 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Homology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Opposite
/-!
# Homology of preadditive categories
In this file, it is shown that if `C` is a preadditive category, then
`ShortComplex C` is a preadditive category.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
namespace ShortComplex
variable {S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
attribute [local simp] Hom.comm₁₂ Hom.comm₂₃
instance : Add (S₁ ⟶ S₂) where
add φ φ' :=
{ τ₁ := φ.τ₁ + φ'.τ₁
τ₂ := φ.τ₂ + φ'.τ₂
τ₃ := φ.τ₃ + φ'.τ₃ }
instance : Sub (S₁ ⟶ S₂) where
sub φ φ' :=
{ τ₁ := φ.τ₁ - φ'.τ₁
τ₂ := φ.τ₂ - φ'.τ₂
τ₃ := φ.τ₃ - φ'.τ₃ }
instance : Neg (S₁ ⟶ S₂) where
neg φ :=
{ τ₁ := -φ.τ₁
τ₂ := -φ.τ₂
τ₃ := -φ.τ₃ }
instance : AddCommGroup (S₁ ⟶ S₂) where
add_assoc := fun a b c => by ext <;> apply add_assoc
add_zero := fun a => by ext <;> apply add_zero
zero_add := fun a => by ext <;> apply zero_add
neg_add_cancel := fun a => by ext <;> apply neg_add_cancel
add_comm := fun a b => by ext <;> apply add_comm
sub_eq_add_neg := fun a b => by ext <;> apply sub_eq_add_neg
nsmul := nsmulRec
zsmul := zsmulRec
@[simp] lemma add_τ₁ (φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (φ + φ').τ₁ = φ.τ₁ + φ'.τ₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_τ₂ (φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (φ + φ').τ₂ = φ.τ₂ + φ'.τ₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_τ₃ (φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (φ + φ').τ₃ = φ.τ₃ + φ'.τ₃ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_τ₁ (φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (φ - φ').τ₁ = φ.τ₁ - φ'.τ₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_τ₂ (φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (φ - φ').τ₂ = φ.τ₂ - φ'.τ₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_τ₃ (φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (φ - φ').τ₃ = φ.τ₃ - φ'.τ₃ := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_τ₁ (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (-φ).τ₁ = -φ.τ₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_τ₂ (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (-φ).τ₂ = -φ.τ₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_τ₃ (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (-φ).τ₃ = -φ.τ₃ := rfl
instance : Preadditive (ShortComplex C) where
section LeftHomology
variable {φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable (γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (γ' : LeftHomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂)
/-- Given a left homology map data for morphism `φ`, this is the induced left homology
map data for `-φ`. -/
@[simps]
def neg : LeftHomologyMapData (-φ) h₁ h₂ where
φK := -γ.φK
φH := -γ.φH
/-- Given left homology map data for morphisms `φ` and `φ'`, this is
the induced left homology map data for `φ + φ'`. -/
@[simps]
def add : LeftHomologyMapData (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ where
φK := γ.φK + γ'.φK
φH := γ.φH + γ'.φH
end LeftHomologyMapData
variable (h₁ h₂)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_neg :
leftHomologyMap' (-φ) h₁ h₂ = -leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ.neg.leftHomologyMap'_eq, LeftHomologyMapData.neg_φH]
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_neg :
cyclesMap' (-φ) h₁ h₂ = -cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.cyclesMap'_eq, γ.neg.cyclesMap'_eq, LeftHomologyMapData.neg_φK]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_add :
leftHomologyMap' (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ = leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ +
leftHomologyMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
have γ' : LeftHomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ'.leftHomologyMap'_eq,
(γ.add γ').leftHomologyMap'_eq, LeftHomologyMapData.add_φH]
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_add :
cyclesMap' (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ = cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ +
cyclesMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
have γ' : LeftHomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.cyclesMap'_eq, γ'.cyclesMap'_eq,
(γ.add γ').cyclesMap'_eq, LeftHomologyMapData.add_φK]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_sub :
leftHomologyMap' (φ - φ') h₁ h₂ = leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ -
leftHomologyMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, leftHomologyMap'_add, leftHomologyMap'_neg]
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_sub :
cyclesMap' (φ - φ') h₁ h₂ = cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ -
cyclesMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, cyclesMap'_add, cyclesMap'_neg]
variable (φ φ')
section
variable [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_neg : leftHomologyMap (-φ) = -leftHomologyMap φ :=
leftHomologyMap'_neg _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_neg : cyclesMap (-φ) = -cyclesMap φ :=
cyclesMap'_neg _ _
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_add : leftHomologyMap (φ + φ') = leftHomologyMap φ + leftHomologyMap φ' :=
leftHomologyMap'_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_add : cyclesMap (φ + φ') = cyclesMap φ + cyclesMap φ' :=
cyclesMap'_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_sub : leftHomologyMap (φ - φ') = leftHomologyMap φ - leftHomologyMap φ' :=
leftHomologyMap'_sub _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_sub : cyclesMap (φ - φ') = cyclesMap φ - cyclesMap φ' :=
cyclesMap'_sub _ _
end
instance leftHomologyFunctor_additive [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] :
(leftHomologyFunctor C).Additive where
instance cyclesFunctor_additive [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] :
(cyclesFunctor C).Additive where
end LeftHomology
section RightHomology
variable {φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable (γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (γ' : RightHomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂)
/-- Given a right homology map data for morphism `φ`, this is the induced right homology
map data for `-φ`. -/
@[simps]
def neg : RightHomologyMapData (-φ) h₁ h₂ where
φQ := -γ.φQ
φH := -γ.φH
/-- Given right homology map data for morphisms `φ` and `φ'`, this is the induced
right homology map data for `φ + φ'`. -/
@[simps]
def add : RightHomologyMapData (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ where
φQ := γ.φQ + γ'.φQ
φH := γ.φH + γ'.φH
end RightHomologyMapData
variable (h₁ h₂)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_neg :
rightHomologyMap' (-φ) h₁ h₂ = -rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, γ.neg.rightHomologyMap'_eq, RightHomologyMapData.neg_φH]
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_neg :
opcyclesMap' (-φ) h₁ h₂ = -opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, γ.neg.opcyclesMap'_eq, RightHomologyMapData.neg_φQ]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_add :
rightHomologyMap' (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ = rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ +
rightHomologyMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
have γ' : RightHomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, γ'.rightHomologyMap'_eq,
(γ.add γ').rightHomologyMap'_eq, RightHomologyMapData.add_φH]
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_add :
opcyclesMap' (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ = opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ +
opcyclesMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
have γ' : RightHomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, γ'.opcyclesMap'_eq,
(γ.add γ').opcyclesMap'_eq, RightHomologyMapData.add_φQ]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_sub :
rightHomologyMap' (φ - φ') h₁ h₂ = rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ -
rightHomologyMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rightHomologyMap'_add, rightHomologyMap'_neg]
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_sub :
opcyclesMap' (φ - φ') h₁ h₂ = opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ -
opcyclesMap' φ' h₁ h₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, opcyclesMap'_add, opcyclesMap'_neg]
variable (φ φ')
section
variable [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_neg : rightHomologyMap (-φ) = -rightHomologyMap φ :=
rightHomologyMap'_neg _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_neg : opcyclesMap (-φ) = -opcyclesMap φ :=
opcyclesMap'_neg _ _
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_add :
rightHomologyMap (φ + φ') = rightHomologyMap φ + rightHomologyMap φ' :=
rightHomologyMap'_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_add : opcyclesMap (φ + φ') = opcyclesMap φ + opcyclesMap φ' :=
opcyclesMap'_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_sub :
rightHomologyMap (φ - φ') = rightHomologyMap φ - rightHomologyMap φ' :=
rightHomologyMap'_sub _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_sub : opcyclesMap (φ - φ') = opcyclesMap φ - opcyclesMap φ' :=
opcyclesMap'_sub _ _
end
instance rightHomologyFunctor_additive [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] :
(rightHomologyFunctor C).Additive where
instance opcyclesFunctor_additive [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] :
(opcyclesFunctor C).Additive where
end RightHomology
section Homology
variable {φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
namespace HomologyMapData
variable (γ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (γ' : HomologyMapData φ' h₁ h₂)
/-- Given a homology map data for a morphism `φ`, this is the induced homology
map data for `-φ`. -/
@[simps]
def neg : HomologyMapData (-φ) h₁ h₂ where
left := γ.left.neg
right := γ.right.neg
/-- Given homology map data for morphisms `φ` and `φ'`, this is the induced homology
map data for `φ + φ'`. -/
@[simps]
def add : HomologyMapData (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ where
left := γ.left.add γ'.left
right := γ.right.add γ'.right
end HomologyMapData
variable (h₁ h₂)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap'_neg :
homologyMap' (-φ) h₁ h₂ = -homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ :=
leftHomologyMap'_neg _ _
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap'_add :
homologyMap' (φ + φ') h₁ h₂ = homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ + homologyMap' φ' h₁ h₂ :=
leftHomologyMap'_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap'_sub :
homologyMap' (φ - φ') h₁ h₂ = homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ - homologyMap' φ' h₁ h₂ :=
leftHomologyMap'_sub _ _
variable (φ φ')
section
variable [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_neg : homologyMap (-φ) = -homologyMap φ :=
homologyMap'_neg _ _
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_add : homologyMap (φ + φ') = homologyMap φ + homologyMap φ' :=
homologyMap'_add _ _
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_sub : homologyMap (φ - φ') = homologyMap φ - homologyMap φ' :=
homologyMap'_sub _ _
end
instance homologyFunctor_additive [CategoryWithHomology C] :
(homologyFunctor C).Additive where
end Homology
section Homotopy
variable (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ φ₄ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- A homotopy between two morphisms of short complexes `S₁ ⟶ S₂` consists of various
maps and conditions which will be sufficient to show that they induce the same morphism
in homology. -/
@[ext]
structure Homotopy where
/-- a morphism `S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁` -/
h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁
h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0 := by aesop_cat
/-- a morphism `S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁` -/
h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁
/-- a morphism `S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂` -/
h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂
/-- a morphism `S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃` -/
h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃
g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0 := by aesop_cat
comm₁ : φ₁.τ₁ = S₁.f ≫ h₁ + h₀ + φ₂.τ₁ := by aesop_cat
comm₂ : φ₁.τ₂ = S₁.g ≫ h₂ + h₁ ≫ S₂.f + φ₂.τ₂ := by aesop_cat
comm₃ : φ₁.τ₃ = h₃ + h₂ ≫ S₂.g + φ₂.τ₃ := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Homotopy.h₀_f Homotopy.g_h₃
variable (S₁ S₂)
/-- Constructor for null homotopic morphisms, see also `Homotopy.ofNullHomotopic`
and `Homotopy.eq_add_nullHomotopic`. -/
@[simps]
def nullHomotopic (h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
S₁ ⟶ S₂ where
τ₁ := h₀ + S₁.f ≫ h₁
τ₂ := h₁ ≫ S₂.f + S₁.g ≫ h₂
τ₃ := h₂ ≫ S₂.g + h₃
namespace Homotopy
attribute [local simp] neg_comp
variable {S₁ S₂ φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ φ₄}
/-- The obvious homotopy between two equal morphisms of short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def ofEq (h : φ₁ = φ₂) : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂ where
h₀ := 0
h₁ := 0
h₂ := 0
h₃ := 0
/-- The obvious homotopy between a morphism of short complexes and itself. -/
@[simps!]
def refl (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : Homotopy φ φ := ofEq rfl
/-- The symmetry of homotopy between morphisms of short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def symm (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Homotopy φ₂ φ₁ where
h₀ := -h.h₀
h₁ := -h.h₁
h₂ := -h.h₂
h₃ := -h.h₃
comm₁ := by rw [h.comm₁, comp_neg]; abel
comm₂ := by rw [h.comm₂, comp_neg, neg_comp]; abel
comm₃ := by rw [h.comm₃, neg_comp]; abel
/-- If two maps of short complexes are homotopic, their opposites also are. -/
@[simps]
def neg (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Homotopy (-φ₁) (-φ₂) where
h₀ := -h.h₀
h₁ := -h.h₁
h₂ := -h.h₂
h₃ := -h.h₃
comm₁ := by rw [neg_τ₁, neg_τ₁, h.comm₁, neg_add_rev, comp_neg]; abel
comm₂ := by rw [neg_τ₂, neg_τ₂, h.comm₂, neg_add_rev, comp_neg, neg_comp]; abel
comm₃ := by rw [neg_τ₃, neg_τ₃, h.comm₃, neg_comp]; abel
/-- The transitivity of homotopy between morphisms of short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def trans (h₁₂ : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) (h₂₃ : Homotopy φ₂ φ₃) : Homotopy φ₁ φ₃ where
h₀ := h₁₂.h₀ + h₂₃.h₀
h₁ := h₁₂.h₁ + h₂₃.h₁
h₂ := h₁₂.h₂ + h₂₃.h₂
h₃ := h₁₂.h₃ + h₂₃.h₃
comm₁ := by rw [h₁₂.comm₁, h₂₃.comm₁, comp_add]; abel
comm₂ := by rw [h₁₂.comm₂, h₂₃.comm₂, comp_add, add_comp]; abel
comm₃ := by rw [h₁₂.comm₃, h₂₃.comm₃, add_comp]; abel
/-- Homotopy between morphisms of short complexes is compatible with addition. -/
@[simps]
def add (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) (h' : Homotopy φ₃ φ₄) : Homotopy (φ₁ + φ₃) (φ₂ + φ₄) where
h₀ := h.h₀ + h'.h₀
h₁ := h.h₁ + h'.h₁
h₂ := h.h₂ + h'.h₂
h₃ := h.h₃ + h'.h₃
comm₁ := by rw [add_τ₁, add_τ₁, h.comm₁, h'.comm₁, comp_add]; abel
comm₂ := by rw [add_τ₂, add_τ₂, h.comm₂, h'.comm₂, comp_add, add_comp]; abel
comm₃ := by rw [add_τ₃, add_τ₃, h.comm₃, h'.comm₃, add_comp]; abel
/-- Homotopy between morphisms of short complexes is compatible with subtraction. -/
@[simps]
def sub (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) (h' : Homotopy φ₃ φ₄) : Homotopy (φ₁ - φ₃) (φ₂ - φ₄) where
h₀ := h.h₀ - h'.h₀
h₁ := h.h₁ - h'.h₁
h₂ := h.h₂ - h'.h₂
h₃ := h.h₃ - h'.h₃
comm₁ := by rw [sub_τ₁, sub_τ₁, h.comm₁, h'.comm₁, comp_sub]; abel
comm₂ := by rw [sub_τ₂, sub_τ₂, h.comm₂, h'.comm₂, comp_sub, sub_comp]; abel
comm₃ := by rw [sub_τ₃, sub_τ₃, h.comm₃, h'.comm₃, sub_comp]; abel
/-- Homotopy between morphisms of short complexes is compatible with precomposition. -/
@[simps]
def compLeft (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) (ψ : S₃ ⟶ S₁) : Homotopy (ψ ≫ φ₁) (ψ ≫ φ₂) where
h₀ := ψ.τ₁ ≫ h.h₀
h₁ := ψ.τ₂ ≫ h.h₁
h₂ := ψ.τ₃ ≫ h.h₂
h₃ := ψ.τ₃ ≫ h.h₃
g_h₃ := by rw [← ψ.comm₂₃_assoc, h.g_h₃, comp_zero]
comm₁ := by rw [comp_τ₁, comp_τ₁, h.comm₁, comp_add, comp_add, add_left_inj, ψ.comm₁₂_assoc]
comm₂ := by rw [comp_τ₂, comp_τ₂, h.comm₂, comp_add, comp_add, assoc, ψ.comm₂₃_assoc]
comm₃ := by rw [comp_τ₃, comp_τ₃, h.comm₃, comp_add, comp_add, assoc]
/-- Homotopy between morphisms of short complexes is compatible with postcomposition. -/
@[simps]
def compRight (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) (ψ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) : Homotopy (φ₁ ≫ ψ) (φ₂ ≫ ψ) where
h₀ := h.h₀ ≫ ψ.τ₁
h₁ := h.h₁ ≫ ψ.τ₁
h₂ := h.h₂ ≫ ψ.τ₂
h₃ := h.h₃ ≫ ψ.τ₃
comm₁ := by rw [comp_τ₁, comp_τ₁, h.comm₁, add_comp, add_comp, assoc]
comm₂ := by rw [comp_τ₂, comp_τ₂, h.comm₂, add_comp, add_comp, assoc, assoc, assoc, ψ.comm₁₂]
comm₃ := by rw [comp_τ₃, comp_τ₃, h.comm₃, add_comp, add_comp, assoc, assoc, ψ.comm₂₃]
/-- Homotopy between morphisms of short complexes is compatible with composition. -/
@[simps!]
def comp (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) {ψ₁ ψ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃} (h' : Homotopy ψ₁ ψ₂) :
Homotopy (φ₁ ≫ ψ₁) (φ₂ ≫ ψ₂) :=
(h.compRight ψ₁).trans (h'.compLeft φ₂)
/-- The homotopy between morphisms in `ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ` that is induced by a homotopy
between morphisms in `ShortComplex C`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Homotopy (opMap φ₁) (opMap φ₂) where
h₀ := h.h₃.op
h₁ := h.h₂.op
h₂ := h.h₁.op
h₃ := h.h₀.op
h₀_f := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.g_h₃
g_h₃ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.h₀_f
comm₁ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by dsimp; rw [h.comm₃]; abel)
comm₂ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by dsimp; rw [h.comm₂]; abel)
comm₃ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by dsimp; rw [h.comm₁]; abel)
/-- The homotopy between morphisms in `ShortComplex C` that is induced by a homotopy
between morphisms in `ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ₁ φ₂ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) :
Homotopy (unopMap φ₁) (unopMap φ₂) where
h₀ := h.h₃.unop
h₁ := h.h₂.unop
h₂ := h.h₁.unop
h₃ := h.h₀.unop
h₀_f := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.g_h₃
g_h₃ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.h₀_f
comm₁ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by dsimp; rw [h.comm₃]; abel)
comm₂ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by dsimp; rw [h.comm₂]; abel)
comm₃ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by dsimp; rw [h.comm₁]; abel)
variable (φ₁ φ₂)
/-- Equivalence expressing that two morphisms are homotopic iff
their difference is homotopic to zero. -/
@[simps]
def equivSubZero : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂ ≃ Homotopy (φ₁ - φ₂) 0 where
toFun h := (h.sub (refl φ₂)).trans (ofEq (sub_self φ₂))
invFun h := ((ofEq (sub_add_cancel φ₁ φ₂).symm).trans
(h.add (refl φ₂))).trans (ofEq (zero_add φ₂))
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
variable {φ₁ φ₂}
lemma eq_add_nullHomotopic (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) :
φ₁ = φ₂ + nullHomotopic _ _ h.h₀ h.h₀_f h.h₁ h.h₂ h.h₃ h.g_h₃ := by
ext
· dsimp; rw [h.comm₁]; abel
· dsimp; rw [h.comm₂]; abel
· dsimp; rw [h.comm₃]; abel
variable (S₁ S₂)
/-- A morphism constructed with `nullHomotopic` is homotopic to zero. -/
@[simps]
def ofNullHomotopic (h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
Homotopy (nullHomotopic _ _ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃) 0 where
h₀ := h₀
h₁ := h₁
h₂ := h₂
h₃ := h₃
h₀_f := h₀_f
g_h₃ := g_h₃
comm₁ := by rw [nullHomotopic_τ₁, zero_τ₁, add_zero]; abel
comm₂ := by rw [nullHomotopic_τ₂, zero_τ₂, add_zero]; abel
comm₃ := by rw [nullHomotopic_τ₃, zero_τ₃, add_zero]; abel
end Homotopy
variable {S₁ S₂}
/-- The left homology map data expressing that null homotopic maps induce the zero
morphism in left homology. -/
def LeftHomologyMapData.ofNullHomotopic
(H₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (H₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
(h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
LeftHomologyMapData (nullHomotopic _ _ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃) H₁ H₂ where
φK := H₂.liftK (H₁.i ≫ h₁ ≫ S₂.f) (by simp)
φH := 0
commf' := by
rw [← cancel_mono H₂.i, assoc, LeftHomologyData.liftK_i, LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc,
nullHomotopic_τ₁, add_comp, add_comp, assoc, assoc, assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i,
right_eq_add, h₀_f]
commπ := by
rw [H₂.liftK_π_eq_zero_of_boundary (H₁.i ≫ h₁ ≫ S₂.f) (H₁.i ≫ h₁) (by rw [assoc]), comp_zero]
/-- The right homology map data expressing that null homotopic maps induce the zero
morphism in right homology. -/
def RightHomologyMapData.ofNullHomotopic
(H₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (H₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
(h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
RightHomologyMapData (nullHomotopic _ _ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃) H₁ H₂ where
φQ := H₁.descQ (S₁.g ≫ h₂ ≫ H₂.p) (by simp)
φH := 0
commg' := by
rw [← cancel_epi H₁.p, RightHomologyData.p_descQ_assoc, RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc,
nullHomotopic_τ₃, comp_add, assoc, assoc, RightHomologyData.p_g', g_h₃, add_zero]
commι := by
rw [H₁.ι_descQ_eq_zero_of_boundary (S₁.g ≫ h₂ ≫ H₂.p) (h₂ ≫ H₂.p) rfl, zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_nullHomotopic
(H₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (H₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
(h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
leftHomologyMap' (nullHomotopic _ _ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃) H₁ H₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.ofNullHomotopic H₁ H₂ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_nullHomotopic
(H₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (H₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
(h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
rightHomologyMap' (nullHomotopic _ _ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃) H₁ H₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.ofNullHomotopic H₁ H₂ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃).rightHomologyMap'_eq
| @[simp]
lemma homologyMap'_nullHomotopic
(H₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (H₂ : S₂.HomologyData)
(h₀ : S₁.X₁ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₀_f : h₀ ≫ S₂.f = 0)
(h₁ : S₁.X₂ ⟶ S₂.X₁) (h₂ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₂) (h₃ : S₁.X₃ ⟶ S₂.X₃) (g_h₃ : S₁.g ≫ h₃ = 0) :
homologyMap' (nullHomotopic _ _ h₀ h₀_f h₁ h₂ h₃ g_h₃) H₁ H₂ = 0 := by
apply leftHomologyMap'_nullHomotopic
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Preadditive.lean | 612 | 618 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
/-!
# Analytic functions
A function is analytic in one dimension around `0` if it can be written as a converging power series
`Σ pₙ zⁿ`. This definition can be extended to any dimension (even in infinite dimension) by
requiring that `pₙ` is a continuous `n`-multilinear map. In general, `pₙ` is not unique (in two
dimensions, taking `p₂ (x, y) (x', y') = x y'` or `y x'` gives the same map when applied to a
vector `(x, y) (x, y)`). A way to guarantee uniqueness is to take a symmetric `pₙ`, but this is not
always possible in nonzero characteristic (in characteristic 2, the previous example has no
symmetric representative). Therefore, we do not insist on symmetry or uniqueness in the definition,
and we only require the existence of a converging series.
The general framework is important to say that the exponential map on bounded operators on a Banach
space is analytic, as well as the inverse on invertible operators.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`.
* `p.radius`: the largest `r : ℝ≥0∞` such that `‖p n‖ * r^n` grows subexponentially.
* `p.le_radius_of_bound`, `p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal`, `p.le_radius_of_isBigO`: if `‖p n‖ * r ^ n`
is bounded above, then `r ≤ p.radius`;
* `p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius`, `p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius`,
`p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius`,
`p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`, `p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`: if `r < p.radius`, then
`‖p n‖ * r ^ n` tends to zero exponentially;
* `p.lt_radius_of_isBigO`: if `r ≠ 0` and `‖p n‖ * r ^ n = O(a ^ n)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then
`r < p.radius`;
* `p.partialSum n x`: the sum `∑_{i = 0}^{n-1} pᵢ xⁱ`.
* `p.sum x`: the sum `∑'_{i = 0}^{∞} pᵢ xⁱ`.
Additionally, let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₙ yⁿ`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`.
* `AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` such that holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We also define versions of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall`, `AnalyticAt`, and `AnalyticOnNhd` restricted to
a set, similar to `ContinuousWithinAt`. See `Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within` for basic properties.
* `AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` means a power series at `x` converges to `f` on `𝓝[s ∪ {x}] x`.
* `AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s t` means `∀ x ∈ t, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function admits a power series, it is continuous (see
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn` and `HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt` and
`AnalyticAt.continuousAt`).
* In a complete space, the sum of a formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the
disk of convergence, see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`.
## Implementation details
We only introduce the radius of convergence of a power series, as `p.radius`.
For a power series in finitely many dimensions, there is a finer (directional, coordinate-dependent)
notion, describing the polydisk of convergence. This notion is more specific, and not necessary to
build the general theory. We do not define it here.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal Set Asymptotics
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.sum x` is the sum `Σ pₙ xⁿ`. A
priori, it only behaves well when `‖x‖ < p.radius`. -/
protected def sum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : F :=
∑' n : ℕ, p n fun _ => x
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.partialSum n x` is the sum
`Σ pₖ xᵏ` for `k ∈ {0,..., n-1}`. -/
def partialSum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) (x : E) : F :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, p k fun _ : Fin k => x
/-- The partial sums of a formal multilinear series are continuous. -/
theorem partialSum_continuous (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (p.partialSum n) := by
unfold partialSum
fun_prop
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### The radius of a formal multilinear series -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
/-- The radius of a formal multilinear series is the largest `r` such that the sum `Σ ‖pₙ‖ ‖y‖ⁿ`
converges for all `‖y‖ < r`. This implies that `Σ pₙ yⁿ` converges for all `‖y‖ < r`, but these
definitions are *not* equivalent in general. -/
def radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0) (C : ℝ) (_ : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C), (r : ℝ≥0∞)
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound (C : ℝ) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
le_iSup_of_le r <| le_iSup_of_le C <| le_iSup (fun _ => (r : ℝ≥0∞)) h
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (C : ℝ≥0) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => mod_cast h n
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(1)`, as `n → ∞`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_isBigO (h : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
Exists.elim (isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff.1 h) fun C hC =>
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (hC n)
theorem le_radius_of_eventually_le (C) (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO <| IsBigO.of_bound C <| h.mono fun n hn => by simpa
theorem le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (∑' n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) fun _ => h.le_tsum' _
theorem le_radius_of_summable (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm <| by
simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at h
exact mod_cast h
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
(h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h r)
theorem radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, p n = 0) : p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO fun r =>
(isBigO_zero _ _).congr' (h.mono fun n hn => by simp [hn]) EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ m, p (m + n) = 0) :
p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero <|
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n, fun _ hk => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hk ▸ hn _⟩
@[simp]
theorem constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius {v : F} :
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius = ⊤ :=
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 1
(by simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries])
/-- `0` has infinite radius of convergence -/
@[simp] lemma zero_radius : (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F).radius = ∞ := by
rw [← constFormalMultilinearSeries_zero]
exact constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1`, `‖p n‖ rⁿ = o(aⁿ)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (a ^ ·) := by
have := (TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4
rw [this]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [(TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4]
simp only [radius, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, C, hC, rt⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at rt
have : 0 < (t : ℝ) := r.coe_nonneg.trans_lt rt
rw [← div_lt_one this] at rt
refine ⟨_, rt, C, Or.inr zero_lt_one, fun n => ?_⟩
calc
|‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n| = ‖p n‖ * (t : ℝ) ^ n * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by
field_simp [mul_right_comm, abs_mul]
_ ≤ C * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by gcongr; apply hC
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = o(1)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
| (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (fun _ => 1 : ℕ → ℝ) :=
let ⟨_, ha, hp⟩ := p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h
hp.trans <| (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left ha.1.le ha.2).congr (fun _ => rfl) one_pow
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1` and `C > 0`, `‖p n‖ * r ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n`. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 5).mp
(p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h)
rcases this with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, H⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, C, hC, fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (H n)⟩
/-- If `r ≠ 0` and `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(aⁿ)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then `r < p.radius`. -/
theorem lt_radius_of_isBigO (h₀ : r ≠ 0) {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1)
(hp : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] (a ^ ·)) : ↑r < p.radius := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 193 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.DependsOn
/-!
# Update a function on a set of values
This file defines `Function.updateFinset`, the operation that updates a function on a
(finite) set of values.
This is a very specific function used for `MeasureTheory.marginal`, and possibly not that useful
for other purposes.
-/
variable {ι : Sort _} {π : ι → Sort _} {x : ∀ i, π i} [DecidableEq ι]
namespace Function
/-- `updateFinset x s y` is the vector `x` with the coordinates in `s` changed to the values of `y`.
-/
def updateFinset (x : ∀ i, π i) (s : Finset ι) (y : ∀ i : ↥s, π i) (i : ι) : π i :=
if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i
open Finset Equiv
theorem updateFinset_def {s : Finset ι} {y} :
updateFinset x s y = fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem updateFinset_empty {y} : updateFinset x ∅ y = x :=
rfl
theorem updateFinset_singleton {i y} :
updateFinset x {i} y = Function.update x i (y ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩) := by
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_self, updateFinset]
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
theorem update_eq_updateFinset {i y} :
Function.update x i y = updateFinset x {i} (uniqueElim y) := by
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_self, updateFinset]
exact uniqueElim_default (α := fun j : ({i} : Finset ι) => π j) y
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
|
/-- If one replaces the variables indexed by a finite set `t`, then `f` no longer depends on
those variables. -/
theorem _root_.DependsOn.updateFinset {α : Type*} {f : (Π i, π i) → α} {s : Set ι}
(hf : DependsOn f s) {t : Finset ι} (y : Π i : t, π i) :
DependsOn (fun x ↦ f (updateFinset x t y)) (s \ t) := by
refine fun x₁ x₂ h ↦ hf (fun i hi ↦ ?_)
simp only [Function.updateFinset]
split_ifs; · rfl
simp_all
/-- If one replaces the variable indexed by `i`, then `f` no longer depends on
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Update.lean | 52 | 63 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
| trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,025 | 1,026 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-! # Functions integrable on a set and at a filter
We define `IntegrableOn f s μ := Integrable f (μ.restrict s)` and prove theorems like
`integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ`.
Next we define a predicate `IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α)`
saying that `f` is integrable at some set `s ∈ l` and prove that a measurable function is integrable
at `l` with respect to `μ` provided that `f` is bounded above at `l ⊓ ae μ` and `μ` is finite
at `l`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Function
open scoped Topology Interval Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ε E F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [ENorm ε] [TopologicalSpace ε]
section
variable [TopologicalSpace β] {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function `f` is strongly measurable at a filter `l` w.r.t. a measure `μ` if it is
ae strongly measurable w.r.t. `μ.restrict s` for some `s ∈ l`. -/
def StronglyMeasurableAtFilter (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)
@[simp]
theorem stronglyMeasurableAt_bot {f : α → β} : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f ⊥ μ :=
⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp⟩
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.eventually (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
(eventually_smallSets' fun _ _ => AEStronglyMeasurable.mono_set).2 h
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.filter_mono (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ)
(h' : l' ≤ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := h
⟨s, h' hsl, hs⟩
protected theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ]⟩
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem {s}
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hl : s ∈ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨s, hl, h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-12")]
alias AeStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem
protected theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
h.aestronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
end
namespace MeasureTheory
section NormedAddCommGroup
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
{μ : Measure α} {C} (hs : μ s < ∞) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.restrict s) :=
haveI : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨by rwa [Measure.restrict_apply_univ]⟩
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded hf
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g : α → E} {s t : Set α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function is `IntegrableOn` a set `s` if it is almost everywhere strongly measurable on `s`
and if the integral of its pointwise norm over `s` is less than infinity. -/
def IntegrableOn (f : α → ε) (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable f (μ.restrict s)
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : Integrable f (μ.restrict s) :=
h
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_empty : IntegrableOn f ∅ μ := by simp [IntegrableOn, integrable_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_univ : IntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_univ]
theorem integrableOn_zero : IntegrableOn (fun _ => (0 : E)) s μ :=
integrable_zero _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_const {C : E} : IntegrableOn (fun _ => C) s μ ↔ C = 0 ∨ μ s < ∞ :=
integrable_const_iff.trans <| by rw [isFiniteMeasure_restrict, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
theorem IntegrableOn.mono (h : IntegrableOn f t ν) (hs : s ⊆ t) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono hs hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono hst le_rfl
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_measure (h : IntegrableOn f s ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono (Subset.refl _) hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.integrable.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_ae hst
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set_ae hst.le
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun_ae (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
Integrable.congr h hst
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun_ae (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst, fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst.symm⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
h.congr_fun_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 (Eventually.of_forall hst))
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun hst hs, fun h => h.congr_fun hst.symm hs⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableOn (h : Integrable f μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ := h.restrict
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t) := by
dsimp only [IntegrableOn] at h ⊢
exact h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_measure Measure.restrict_le_self _
theorem IntegrableOn.inter_of_restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t)) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∩ t) μ := by
have := h.mono_set (inter_subset_left (t := t))
rwa [IntegrableOn, μ.restrict_restrict_of_subset inter_subset_right] at this
lemma Integrable.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : IntegrableOn g sᶜ μ) :
Integrable (s.piecewise f g) μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn] at hf hg
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact MemLp.piecewise hs hf hg
theorem IntegrableOn.left_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_left
theorem IntegrableOn.right_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_right
theorem IntegrableOn.union (hs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ :=
(hs.add_measure ht).mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_union_le _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_union, h.right_of_union⟩, fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_singleton_iff {x : α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
IntegrableOn f {x} μ ↔ f x = 0 ∨ μ {x} < ∞ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x}] fun _ => f x := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_singleton x)] with _ ha
simp only [mem_singleton_iff.1 ha]
rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr this, integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict,
lt_top_iff_ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_biUnion {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hf => simp [hf, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finset_iUnion {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ :=
integrableOn_finite_biUnion s.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_iUnion [Finite β] {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype β
simpa using @integrableOn_finset_iUnion _ _ _ _ _ f μ Finset.univ t
lemma IntegrableOn.finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
rw [← s.toSet.biUnion_of_singleton]
simp [integrableOn_finset_iUnion, measure_lt_top]
lemma IntegrableOn.of_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simpa using IntegrableOn.finset (s := hs.toFinset)
theorem IntegrableOn.add_measure (hμ : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hν : IntegrableOn f s ν) :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) := by
delta IntegrableOn; rw [Measure.restrict_add]; exact hμ.integrable.add_measure hν
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_add_measure :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_right le_rfl), h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_left le_rfl)⟩,
fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, he.restrict_map, he.integrable_map_iff]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range e) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableOn_map_iff, he.map_comap, IntegrableOn,
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_range_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableOn f (range e) μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ e) (μ.comap e) := by
rw [he.integrableOn_iff_comap .rfl, preimage_range, integrableOn_univ]
theorem integrableOn_iff_comap_subtypeVal (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ (↑) : s → E) (μ.comap (↑)) := by
rw [← (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableOn_range_iff_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem integrableOn_map_equiv [MeasurableSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set β} : IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp only [IntegrableOn, e.restrict_map, integrable_map_equiv e]
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
(h₁.restrict_preimage_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_image [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (e '' s) ν ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) s μ :=
((h₁.restrict_image_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂).symm
theorem integrable_indicator_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, Integrable, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm,
enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, lintegral_indicator hs,
aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs]
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_indicator (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
(integrable_indicator_iff hs).2 h
@[fun_prop]
theorem Integrable.indicator (h : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
h.integrableOn.integrable_indicator hs
theorem IntegrableOn.indicator (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
IntegrableOn (indicator t f) s μ :=
Integrable.indicator h ht
theorem integrable_indicatorConstLp {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
Integrable (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) μ := by
rw [integrable_congr indicatorConstLp_coeFn, integrable_indicator_iff hs, IntegrableOn,
integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict]
exact .inr hμs
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and nonzero there, then the measurable hull of `s` is
well behaved: the restriction of the measure to `toMeasurable μ s` coincides with its restriction
to `s`. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict_toMeasurable (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (h's : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s := by
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ) with ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩
let v n := toMeasurable (μ.restrict s) { x | u n ≤ ‖f x‖ }
have A : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ v n) ≠ ∞ := by
intro n
rw [inter_comm, ← Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_toMeasurable]
exact (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top (u_pos n)).ne
apply Measure.restrict_toMeasurable_of_cover _ A
intro x hx
have : 0 < ‖f x‖ := by simp only [h's x hx, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < ‖f x‖ := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ this).exists
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, subset_toMeasurable _ _ hn.le⟩
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s`, and vanishes on `t \ s`, then it is integrable on `t`
if `t` is null-measurable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.of_ae_diff_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ t \ s → f x = 0) : IntegrableOn f t μ := by
let u := { x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0 }
have hu : IntegrableOn f u μ := hf.mono_set fun x hx => hx.1
let v := toMeasurable μ u
have A : IntegrableOn f v μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, hu.restrict_toMeasurable]
· exact hu
· intro x hx; exact hx.2
have B : IntegrableOn f (t \ v) μ := by
apply integrableOn_zero.congr
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_of_ae h't,
ae_restrict_mem₀ (ht.diff (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ u).nullMeasurableSet)] with x hxt hx
by_cases h'x : x ∈ s
· by_contra H
exact hx.2 (subset_toMeasurable μ u ⟨h'x, Ne.symm H⟩)
· exact (hxt ⟨hx.1, h'x⟩).symm
apply (A.union B).mono_set _
rw [union_diff_self]
exact subset_union_right
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s`, and vanishes on `t \ s`, then it is integrable on `t`
if `t` is measurable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.of_forall_diff_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h't : ∀ x ∈ t \ s, f x = 0) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
hf.of_ae_diff_eq_zero ht.nullMeasurableSet (Eventually.of_forall h't)
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and vanishes almost everywhere on its complement,
then it is integrable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_of_ae_not_mem_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s → f x = 0) : Integrable f μ := by
rw [← integrableOn_univ]
apply hf.of_ae_diff_eq_zero nullMeasurableSet_univ
filter_upwards [h't] with x hx h'x using hx h'x.2
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and vanishes everywhere on its complement,
then it is integrable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_of_forall_not_mem_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(h't : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) : Integrable f μ :=
hf.integrable_of_ae_not_mem_eq_zero (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => h't x hx)
theorem integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset (h1s : support f ⊆ s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.integrableOn⟩
refine h.integrable_of_forall_not_mem_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_
contrapose! hx
exact h1s (mem_support.2 hx)
theorem integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(f : Lp E p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
refine memLp_one_iff_integrable.mp ?_
have hμ_restrict_univ : (μ.restrict s) Set.univ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Set.univ_inter, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
haveI hμ_finite : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨hμ_restrict_univ⟩
exact ((Lp.memLp _).restrict s).mono_exponent hp
theorem Integrable.lintegral_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
(∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
calc
(∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ x, ↑‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_enorm f
_ < ∞ := hf.2
theorem IntegrableOn.setLIntegral_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
(∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
Integrable.lintegral_lt_top hf
/-- We say that a function `f` is *integrable at filter* `l` if it is integrable on some
set `s ∈ l`. Equivalently, it is eventually integrable on `s` in `l.smallSets`. -/
def IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → ε) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, IntegrableOn f s μ
variable {l l' : Filter α}
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableAtFilter_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l.map e) (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableAtFilter (f ∘ e) l μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableAtFilter, he.integrableOn_map_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
· exact ⟨_, hs⟩
· exact ⟨e '' s, by rwa [mem_map, he.injective.preimage_image]⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableAtFilter_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l.map e) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter (f ∘ e) l (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableAtFilter_map_iff, IntegrableAtFilter, he.map_comap]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨s, hs, int⟩
· exact ⟨s, hs, int.mono_measure <| μ.restrict_le_self⟩
· exact ⟨_, inter_mem hs range_mem_map, int.inter_of_restrict⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableAtFilter (h : Integrable f μ) (l : Filter α) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, Filter.univ_mem, integrableOn_univ.2 h⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.eventually (h : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, IntegrableOn f s μ :=
Iff.mpr (eventually_smallSets' fun _s _t hst ht => ht.mono_set hst) h
theorem integrableAtFilter_atBot_iff [Preorder α] [IsDirected α fun (x1 x2 : α) => x1 ≥ x2]
[Nonempty α] :
IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ↔ ∃ a, IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, hs, hi⟩ ↦ ?_, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, ha⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hs
exact ⟨t, hi.mono_set fun _ hx ↦ ht _ hx⟩
theorem integrableAtFilter_atTop_iff [Preorder α] [IsDirected α fun (x1 x2 : α) => x1 ≤ x2]
[Nonempty α] :
IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ↔ ∃ a, IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableAtFilter_atBot_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.add {f g : α → E}
(hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (f + g) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
rcases hg with ⟨t, tl, ht⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ t, inter_mem sl tl, ?_⟩
exact (hs.mono_set inter_subset_left).add (ht.mono_set inter_subset_right)
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.neg {f : α → E} (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (-f) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, sl, hs.neg⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.sub {f g : α → E}
(hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (f - g) l μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] {f : α → E} (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (c : 𝕜) :
IntegrableAtFilter (c • f) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, sl, hs.smul c⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.norm (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (fun x => ‖f x‖) l μ :=
Exists.casesOn hf fun s hs ↦ ⟨s, hs.1, hs.2.norm⟩
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.filter_mono (hl : l ≤ l') (hl' : IntegrableAtFilter f l' μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
let ⟨s, hs, hsf⟩ := hl'
⟨s, hl hs, hsf⟩
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_of_left (hl : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊓ l') μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_of_right (hl : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l' ⊓ l) μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_right
@[simp]
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_ae_iff {l : Filter α} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊓ ae μ) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h.filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨t, ht, u, hu, rfl⟩, hf⟩
refine ⟨t, ht, hf.congr_set_ae <| eventuallyEq_set.2 ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hu] with x hx using (and_iff_left hx).symm
alias ⟨IntegrableAtFilter.of_inf_ae, _⟩ := IntegrableAtFilter.inf_ae_iff
@[simp]
theorem integrableAtFilter_top : IntegrableAtFilter f ⊤ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.integrableAtFilter ⊤⟩
obtain ⟨s, hsf, hs⟩ := h
exact (integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset fun _ _ ↦ hsf _).mp hs
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff {l l' : Filter α} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊔ l') μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f l μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f l' μ := by
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨h.filter_mono le_sup_left, h.filter_mono le_sup_right⟩
· exact fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, ⟨t, htl, ht⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨s ∪ t, union_mem_sup hsl htl, hs.union ht⟩
/-- If `μ` is a measure finite at filter `l` and `f` is a function such that its norm is bounded
above at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`. -/
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter {l : Filter α} [IsMeasurablyGenerated l]
(hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l)
(hf : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (norm ∘ f)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
hf.imp fun C hC => eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨_, hC, fun t => id⟩
rcases (hfm.eventually.and (hμ.eventually.and hC)).exists_measurable_mem_of_smallSets with
⟨s, hsl, hsm, hfm, hμ, hC⟩
refine ⟨s, hsl, ⟨hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded hμ (C := C) ?_⟩⟩
rw [ae_restrict_eq hsm, eventually_inf_principal]
exact Eventually.of_forall hC
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto_ae {l : Filter α}
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l] (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l) {b}
(hf : Tendsto f (l ⊓ ae μ) (𝓝 b)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
(hμ.inf_of_left.integrableAtFilter (hfm.filter_mono inf_le_left)
hf.norm.isBoundedUnder_le).of_inf_ae
alias _root_.Filter.Tendsto.integrableAtFilter_ae :=
Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto_ae
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto {l : Filter α}
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l] (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l) {b}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
hμ.integrableAtFilter hfm hf.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
alias _root_.Filter.Tendsto.integrableAtFilter :=
Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto
lemma Measure.integrableOn_of_bounded (s_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (f_mble : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{M : ℝ} (f_bdd : ∀ᵐ a ∂(μ.restrict s), ‖f a‖ ≤ M) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
⟨f_mble.restrict, hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded (C := M) s_finite.lt_top f_bdd⟩
theorem integrable_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E} (h : Disjoint (support f) (support g))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => h.1.add h.2⟩
· rw [← indicator_add_eq_left h]; exact hfg.indicator hf.measurableSet_support
· rw [← indicator_add_eq_right h]; exact hfg.indicator hg.measurableSet_support
/-- If a function converges along a filter to a limit `a`, is integrable along this filter, and
all elements of the filter have infinite measure, then the limit has to vanish. -/
lemma IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto
(h : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (h' : ∀ s ∈ l, μ s = ∞) {a : E}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : a = 0 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε ∧ ε < ‖a‖ := exists_between (norm_pos_iff.mpr H)
rcases h with ⟨u, ul, hu⟩
let v := u ∩ {b | ε < ‖f b‖}
have hv : IntegrableOn f v μ := hu.mono_set inter_subset_left
have vl : v ∈ l := inter_mem ul ((tendsto_order.1 hf.norm).1 _ hε)
have : μ.restrict v v < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right)
(Integrable.measure_gt_lt_top hv.norm εpos)
have : μ v ≠ ∞ := ne_of_lt (by simpa only [Measure.restrict_apply_self])
exact this (h' v vl)
end NormedAddCommGroup
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- A function which is continuous on a set `s` is almost everywhere measurable with respect to
`μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aemeasurable [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
nontriviality α; inhabit α
have : (Set.piecewise s f fun _ => f default) =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
refine ⟨Set.piecewise s f fun _ => f default, ?_, this.symm⟩
apply measurable_of_isOpen
intro t ht
obtain ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩ : ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
_root_.continuousOn_iff'.1 hf t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage, Set.ite, hu]
exact (u_open.measurableSet.inter hs).union ((measurable_const ht.measurableSet).diff hs)
/-- A function which is continuous on a separable set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable
with respect to `μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isSeparable [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
borelize β
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.aemeasurable hs, f '' s, hf.isSeparable_image h's, ?_⟩
exact mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict hs) (subset_preimage_image _ _)
/-- A function which is continuous on a set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable with
respect to `μ.restrict s` when either the source space or the target space is second-countable. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
{f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
borelize β
refine
aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable.2
⟨hf.aemeasurable hs, f '' s, ?_,
mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict hs) (subset_preimage_image _ _)⟩
cases h.out
· rw [image_eq_range]
exact isSeparable_range <| continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf
· exact .of_separableSpace _
/-- A function which is continuous on a compact set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable
with respect to `μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsCompact s) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
borelize β
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.aemeasurable h's, f '' s, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isSeparable
· exact mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict h's) (subset_preimage_image _ _)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin_of_isSeparable [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
{a : α} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} (hft : ContinuousOn f t) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h't : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) (ha : a ∈ t) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[t] a) μ :=
haveI : (𝓝[t] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated := ht.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
(hft a ha).integrableAtFilter
⟨_, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hft.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isSeparable ht h't⟩
(μ.finiteAt_nhdsWithin _ _)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin [TopologicalSpace α]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α E] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {a : α} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} (hft : ContinuousOn f t)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (ha : a ∈ t) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[t] a) μ :=
haveI : (𝓝[t] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated := ht.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
(hft a ha).integrableAtFilter ⟨_, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hft.aestronglyMeasurable ht⟩
(μ.finiteAt_nhdsWithin _ _)
theorem Continuous.integrableAt_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α E]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E}
(hf : Continuous f) (a : α) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 a) μ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
exact hf.continuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin MeasurableSet.univ (mem_univ a)
/-- If a function is continuous on an open set `s`, then it is strongly measurable at the filter
`𝓝 x` for all `x ∈ s` if either the source space or the target space is second-countable. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
∀ x ∈ s, StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ := fun _x hx =>
⟨s, IsOpen.mem_nhds hs hx, hf.aestronglyMeasurable hs.measurableSet⟩
theorem ContinuousAt.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) : ∀ x ∈ s, StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ :=
ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter hs <| continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt hf
theorem Continuous.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter α) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
/-- If a function is continuous on a measurable set `s`, then it is measurable at the filter
`𝓝[s] x` for all `x`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_nhdsWithin {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (x : α) :
StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ :=
⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf.aestronglyMeasurable hs⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about adding and removing interval boundaries
The primed lemmas take explicit arguments about the measure being finite at the endpoint, while
the unprimed ones use `[NoAtoms μ]`.
-/
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → E} {μ : Measure α} {a b : α}
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) :
| IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· rw [← Ioc_union_left hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr ha.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Icc_eq_empty hab, Ioc_eq_empty]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegrableOn.lean | 653 | 657 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Constant speed
This file defines the notion of constant (and unit) speed for a function `f : ℝ → E` with
pseudo-emetric structure on `E` with respect to a set `s : Set ℝ` and "speed" `l : ℝ≥0`, and shows
that if `f` has locally bounded variation on `s`, it can be obtained (up to distance zero, on `s`),
as a composite `φ ∘ (variationOnFromTo f s a)`, where `φ` has unit speed and `a ∈ s`.
## Main definitions
* `HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `l`.
* `HasUnitSpeedOn f s`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `1`.
* `naturalParameterization f s a : ℝ → E`, the unit speed reparameterization of `f` on `s` relative
to `a`.
## Main statements
* `unique_unit_speed_on_Icc_zero` proves that if `f` and `f ∘ φ` are both naturally
parameterized on closed intervals starting at `0`, then `φ` must be the identity on
those intervals.
* `edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero` proves that if `f` has locally bounded variation, then
precomposing `naturalParameterization f s a` with `variationOnFromTo f s a` yields a function
at distance zero from `f` on `s`.
* `has_unit_speed_naturalParameterization` proves that if `f` has locally bounded
variation, then `naturalParameterization f s a` has unit speed on `s`.
## Tags
arc-length, parameterization
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
open Set
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
variable (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) (l : ℝ≥0)
/-- `f` has constant speed `l` on `s` if the variation of `f` on `s ∩ Icc x y` is equal to
`l * (y - x)` for any `x y` in `s`.
-/
def HasConstantSpeedOnWith :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x))
variable {f s l}
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn (h : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l) :
LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s := fun x y hx hy => by
simp only [BoundedVariationOn, h hx hy, Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, not_false_iff]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_of_subsingleton (f : ℝ → E) {s : Set ℝ} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(l : ℝ≥0) : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l := by
rintro x hx y hy; cases hs hx hy
rw [eVariationOn.subsingleton f (fun y hy z hz => hs hy.1 hz.1 : (s ∩ Icc x x).Subsingleton)]
simp only [sub_self, mul_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s),
x ≤ y → eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x)) := by
refine ⟨fun h x xs y ys _ => h xs ys, fun h x xs y ys => ?_⟩
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· exact h xs ys xy
· rw [eVariationOn.subsingleton, ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos]
· exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos l.prop (sub_nonpos_of_le yx)
· rintro z ⟨zs, xz, zy⟩ w ⟨ws, xw, wy⟩
cases le_antisymm (zy.trans yx) xz
cases le_antisymm (wy.trans yx) xw
rfl
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l ↔ LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), variationOnFromTo f s x y = l * (y - x) := by
constructor
· rintro h; refine ⟨h.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn, fun x xs y ys => ?_⟩
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered] at h
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le f s xy, h xs ys xy]
exact ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr xy))
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_ge f s yx, h ys xs yx]
have := ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr yx))
simp_all only [NNReal.val_eq_coe]; ring
· rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered]
rintro h x xs y ys xy
rw [← h.2 xs ys, variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le f s xy, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (h.1 x y xs ys)]
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.union {t : Set ℝ} (hfs : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l)
(hft : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f t l) {x : ℝ} (hs : IsGreatest s x) (ht : IsLeast t x) :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (s ∪ t) l := by
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered] at hfs hft ⊢
rintro z (zs | zt) y (ys | yt) zy
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = s ∩ Icc z y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨ws, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨(le_antisymm (wy.trans (hs.2 ys)) (ht.2 wt)).symm ▸ hs.1, zw, wy⟩
· rintro ⟨ws, zwy⟩; exact ⟨Or.inl ws, zwy⟩
rw [this, hfs zs ys zy]
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = s ∩ Icc z x ∪ t ∩ Icc x y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
exacts [Or.inl ⟨ws, zw, hs.2 ws⟩, Or.inr ⟨wt, ht.2 wt, wy⟩]
· rintro (⟨ws, zw, wx⟩ | ⟨wt, xw, wy⟩)
exacts [⟨Or.inl ws, zw, wx.trans (ht.2 yt)⟩, ⟨Or.inr wt, (hs.2 zs).trans xw, wy⟩]
rw [this, @eVariationOn.union _ _ _ _ f _ _ x, hfs zs hs.1 (hs.2 zs), hft ht.1 yt (ht.2 yt)]
· have q := ENNReal.ofReal_add (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr (hs.2 zs)))
(mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr (ht.2 yt)))
simp only [NNReal.val_eq_coe] at q
rw [← q]
ring_nf
exacts [⟨⟨hs.1, hs.2 zs, le_rfl⟩, fun w ⟨_, _, wx⟩ => wx⟩,
⟨⟨ht.1, le_rfl, ht.2 yt⟩, fun w ⟨_, xw, _⟩ => xw⟩]
· cases le_antisymm zy ((hs.2 ys).trans (ht.2 zt))
simp only [Icc_self, sub_self, mul_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact eVariationOn.subsingleton _ fun _ ⟨_, uz⟩ _ ⟨_, vz⟩ => uz.trans vz.symm
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = t ∩ Icc z y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨le_antisymm ((ht.2 zt).trans zw) (hs.2 ws) ▸ ht.1, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨wt, zw, wy⟩
· rintro ⟨wt, zwy⟩; exact ⟨Or.inr wt, zwy⟩
rw [this, hft zt yt zy]
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.Icc_Icc {x y z : ℝ} (hfs : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc x y) l)
(hft : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc y z) l) : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc x z) l := by
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· rcases le_total y z with (yz | zy)
· rw [← Set.Icc_union_Icc_eq_Icc xy yz]
exact hfs.union hft (isGreatest_Icc xy) (isLeast_Icc yz)
· rintro u ⟨xu, uz⟩ v ⟨xv, vz⟩
rw [Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu, inf_of_le_right vz, ←
hfs ⟨xu, uz.trans zy⟩ ⟨xv, vz.trans zy⟩, Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu,
inf_of_le_right (vz.trans zy)]
· rintro u ⟨xu, uz⟩ v ⟨xv, vz⟩
rw [Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu, inf_of_le_right vz, ←
hft ⟨yx.trans xu, uz⟩ ⟨yx.trans xv, vz⟩, Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right (yx.trans xu),
inf_of_le_right vz]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_zero_iff :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s 0 ↔ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), edist (f x) (f y) = 0 := by
dsimp [HasConstantSpeedOnWith]
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· by_contra!
obtain ⟨h, hfs⟩ := this
simp_rw [ne_eq, eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff] at hfs h
push_neg at hfs
obtain ⟨x, xs, y, ys, hxy⟩ := hfs
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· exact hxy (h xs ys x ⟨xs, le_rfl, xy⟩ y ⟨ys, xy, le_rfl⟩)
· rw [edist_comm] at hxy
exact hxy (h ys xs y ⟨ys, le_rfl, yx⟩ x ⟨xs, yx, le_rfl⟩)
· rintro h x _ y _
refine le_antisymm ?_ zero_le'
rw [← h]
exact eVariationOn.mono f inter_subset_left
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.ratio {l' : ℝ≥0} (hl' : l' ≠ 0) {φ : ℝ → ℝ} (φm : MonotoneOn φ s)
(hfφ : HasConstantSpeedOnWith (f ∘ φ) s l) (hf : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (φ '' s) l') ⦃x : ℝ⦄
(xs : x ∈ s) : EqOn φ (fun y => l / l' * (y - x) + φ x) s := by
rintro y ys
rw [← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, eq_div_iff (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr hl')]
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq] at hf
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq] at hfφ
symm
calc
(y - x) * l = l * (y - x) := by rw [mul_comm]
_ = variationOnFromTo (f ∘ φ) s x y := (hfφ.2 xs ys).symm
_ = variationOnFromTo f (φ '' s) (φ x) (φ y) :=
(variationOnFromTo.comp_eq_of_monotoneOn f φ φm xs ys)
_ = l' * (φ y - φ x) := (hf.2 ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩ ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩)
_ = (φ y - φ x) * l' := by rw [mul_comm]
/-- `f` has unit speed on `s` if it is linearly parameterized by `l = 1` on `s`. -/
def HasUnitSpeedOn (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) :=
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s 1
theorem HasUnitSpeedOn.union {t : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hfs : HasUnitSpeedOn f s)
(hft : HasUnitSpeedOn f t) (hs : IsGreatest s x) (ht : IsLeast t x) :
HasUnitSpeedOn f (s ∪ t) :=
HasConstantSpeedOnWith.union hfs hft hs ht
theorem HasUnitSpeedOn.Icc_Icc {x y z : ℝ} (hfs : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc x y))
(hft : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc y z)) : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc x z) :=
HasConstantSpeedOnWith.Icc_Icc hfs hft
/-- If both `f` and `f ∘ φ` have unit speed (on `t` and `s` respectively) and `φ`
monotonically maps `s` onto `t`, then `φ` is just a translation (on `s`).
-/
theorem unique_unit_speed {φ : ℝ → ℝ} (φm : MonotoneOn φ s) (hfφ : HasUnitSpeedOn (f ∘ φ) s)
(hf : HasUnitSpeedOn f (φ '' s)) ⦃x : ℝ⦄ (xs : x ∈ s) : EqOn φ (fun y => y - x + φ x) s := by
dsimp only [HasUnitSpeedOn] at hf hfφ
convert HasConstantSpeedOnWith.ratio one_ne_zero φm hfφ hf xs using 3
norm_num
/-- If both `f` and `f ∘ φ` have unit speed (on `Icc 0 t` and `Icc 0 s` respectively)
and `φ` monotonically maps `Icc 0 s` onto `Icc 0 t`, then `φ` is the identity on `Icc 0 s`
-/
theorem unique_unit_speed_on_Icc_zero {s t : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) (ht : 0 ≤ t) {φ : ℝ → ℝ}
(φm : MonotoneOn φ <| Icc 0 s) (φst : φ '' Icc 0 s = Icc 0 t)
(hfφ : HasUnitSpeedOn (f ∘ φ) (Icc 0 s)) (hf : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc 0 t)) :
EqOn φ id (Icc 0 s) := by
rw [← φst] at hf
convert unique_unit_speed φm hfφ hf ⟨le_rfl, hs⟩ using 1
have : φ 0 = 0 := by
have hm : 0 ∈ φ '' Icc 0 s := by simp only [φst, ht, mem_Icc, le_refl, and_self]
obtain ⟨x, xs, hx⟩ := hm
apply le_antisymm ((φm ⟨le_rfl, hs⟩ xs xs.1).trans_eq hx) _
have := φst ▸ mapsTo_image φ (Icc 0 s)
exact (mem_Icc.mp (@this 0 (by rw [mem_Icc]; exact ⟨le_rfl, hs⟩))).1
simp only [tsub_zero, this, add_zero]
rfl
/-- The natural parameterization of `f` on `s`, which, if `f` has locally bounded variation on `s`,
* has unit speed on `s` (by `has_unit_speed_naturalParameterization`).
* composed with `variationOnFromTo f s a`, is at distance zero from `f`
(by `edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero`).
-/
noncomputable def naturalParameterization (f : α → E) (s : Set α) (a : α) : ℝ → E :=
f ∘ @Function.invFunOn _ _ ⟨a⟩ (variationOnFromTo f s a) s
theorem edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
(hf : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) {a : α} (as : a ∈ s) {b : α} (bs : b ∈ s) :
edist (naturalParameterization f s a (variationOnFromTo f s a b)) (f b) = 0 := by
dsimp only [naturalParameterization]
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨a⟩
obtain ⟨cs, hc⟩ := Function.invFunOn_pos (b := variationOnFromTo f s a b) ⟨b, bs, rfl⟩
rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_left_iff hf as cs bs] at hc
apply variationOnFromTo.edist_zero_of_eq_zero hf cs bs hc
theorem has_unit_speed_naturalParameterization (f : α → E) {s : Set α}
(hf : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) {a : α} (as : a ∈ s) :
HasUnitSpeedOn (naturalParameterization f s a) (variationOnFromTo f s a '' s) := by
dsimp only [HasUnitSpeedOn]
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered]
rintro _ ⟨b, bs, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, cs, rfl⟩ h
rcases le_total c b with (cb | bc)
· rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, le_antisymm h (variationOnFromTo.monotoneOn hf as cs bs cb),
sub_self, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, Icc_self, eVariationOn.subsingleton]
exact fun x hx y hy => hx.2.trans hy.2.symm
· rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, variationOnFromTo.eq_neg_swap, neg_neg, add_comm,
variationOnFromTo.add hf bs as cs, ← variationOnFromTo.eq_neg_swap f]
rw [←
eVariationOn.comp_inter_Icc_eq_of_monotoneOn (naturalParameterization f s a) _
(variationOnFromTo.monotoneOn hf as) bs cs]
rw [@eVariationOn.eq_of_edist_zero_on _ _ _ _ _ f]
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le _ _ bc, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (hf b c bs cs)]
· rintro x ⟨xs, _, _⟩
exact edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero hf as xs
| Mathlib/Analysis/ConstantSpeed.lean | 259 | 277 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [continuousOn_iff']
constructor
· intro h t ht
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu]
apply IsOpen.inter u_open hs
· intro h t ht
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, ?_⟩
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self]
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
(continuousOn_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_preimage {t : Set β} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hp : f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) := by
convert (continuousOn_open_iff hs).mp h t ht
rw [inter_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hp]
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rcases continuousOn_iff_isClosed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu.2]
apply IsClosed.inter hu.1 hs
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
calc
s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter (Subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
(hf.isOpen_inter_preimage hs isOpen_interior)
_ = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) := by rw [interior_inter, hs.interior_eq]
theorem continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ContinuousOn f (s ∩ t)) : ContinuousOn f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩
rwa [ContinuousWithinAt, ← nhdsWithin_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
theorem continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ T, f x ∈ t → f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
forall₂_congr fun x _ => by
delta ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun t => forall_swap
theorem continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ T, IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t)) :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s :=
continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff.2 fun _x hx t ht hxt => mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨_, h t ht, ⟨hx, hxt⟩, fun _y hy => hy.1.2⟩
/-!
### Congruence and monotonicity properties with respect to sets
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
/-- If two sets coincide around `x`, then being continuous within one or the other at `x` is
equivalent. See also `continuousWithinAt_congr_set'` which requires that the sets coincide
locally away from a point `y`, in a T1 space. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq.mpr h]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_set (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f t x :=
(continuousWithinAt_congr_set h).1 hf
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_union :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
/- `continuousWithinAt_insert` gives the same equivalence but at a point `y` possibly different
from `x`. As this requires the space to be T1, and this property is not available in this file,
this is found in another file although it is part of the basic API for `continuousWithinAt`. -/
|
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 761 | 763 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Alexey Soloyev, Junyan Xu, Kamila Szewczyk
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.LinearRecurrence
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.NatFib
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Prime
/-!
# The golden ratio and its conjugate
This file defines the golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2` and its conjugate
`ψ := (1 - √5)/2`, which are the two real roots of `X² - X - 1`.
Along with various computational facts about them, we prove their
irrationality, and we link them to the Fibonacci sequence by proving
Binet's formula.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
/-- The golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenRatio : ℝ := (1 + √5) / 2
/-- The conjugate of the golden ratio `ψ := (1 - √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenConj : ℝ := (1 - √5) / 2
@[inherit_doc goldenRatio] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "φ" => goldenRatio
@[inherit_doc goldenConj] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "ψ" => goldenConj
open Real goldenRatio
/-- The inverse of the golden ratio is the opposite of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_gold : φ⁻¹ = -ψ := by
have : 1 + √5 ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (add_pos (by norm_num) <| Real.sqrt_pos.mpr (by norm_num))
field_simp [sub_mul, mul_add]
norm_num
/-- The opposite of the golden ratio is the inverse of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_goldConj : ψ⁻¹ = -φ := by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, ← neg_inv, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
exact inv_gold.symm
@[simp]
theorem gold_mul_goldConj : φ * ψ = -1 := by
field_simp
rw [← sq_sub_sq]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem goldConj_mul_gold : ψ * φ = -1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact gold_mul_goldConj
@[simp]
theorem gold_add_goldConj : φ + ψ = 1 := by
rw [goldenRatio, goldenConj]
ring
theorem one_sub_goldConj : 1 - φ = ψ := by
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
theorem one_sub_gold : 1 - ψ = φ := by
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
@[simp]
theorem gold_sub_goldConj : φ - ψ = √5 := by ring
theorem gold_pow_sub_gold_pow (n : ℕ) : φ ^ (n + 2) - φ ^ (n + 1) = φ ^ n := by
rw [goldenRatio]; ring_nf; norm_num; ring
@[simp 1200]
theorem gold_sq : φ ^ 2 = φ + 1 := by
rw [goldenRatio, ← sub_eq_zero]
ring_nf
rw [Real.sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
@[simp 1200]
theorem goldConj_sq : ψ ^ 2 = ψ + 1 := by
rw [goldenConj, ← sub_eq_zero]
ring_nf
rw [Real.sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
theorem gold_pos : 0 < φ :=
mul_pos (by apply add_pos <;> norm_num) <| inv_pos.2 zero_lt_two
theorem gold_ne_zero : φ ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt gold_pos
theorem one_lt_gold : 1 < φ := by
| refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ?_ (le_of_lt gold_pos)
simp [← sq, gold_pos, zero_lt_one]
theorem gold_lt_two : φ < 2 := by calc
| Mathlib/Data/Real/GoldenRatio.lean | 98 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.IntegralCompProd
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.StandardBorel
/-!
# Lebesgue and Bochner integrals of conditional kernels
Integrals of `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel` and `MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_condKernel`: the integral
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)` is equal to
`∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a)`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.setIntegral_condKernel`:
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ`
Corresponding statements for the Lebesgue integral and/or without the sets `s` and `t` are also
provided.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β Ω : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem (a : α) {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x) (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
simp_rw [Kernel.compProd_apply hs]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : κ a (s ×ˢ t) = (Kernel.fst κ ⊗ₖ Kernel.condKernel κ) a (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (κ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, Kernel.compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s ×ˢ t}
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [Set.preimage, this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ hf]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.setLIntegral_compProd _ _ _ hf hs ht]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a hs MeasurableSet.univ]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a MeasurableSet.univ ht]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Lintegral
section Integral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{E : Type*} {f : β × Ω → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_condKernel (a : α)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (κ a)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x)))
(Kernel.fst κ a) := by
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd hf
lemma integral_condKernel (a : α) (hf : Integrable f (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [integral_compProd hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [setIntegral_compProd hs ht hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ Set.univ) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a hs MeasurableSet.univ hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (a : α) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a MeasurableSet.univ ht hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Integral
| end ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {β Ω : Type*} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Integral.lean | 125 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta.Basic
/-!
# Urysohn's lemma
In this file we prove Urysohn's lemma `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed`: for any two disjoint
closed sets `s` and `t` in a normal topological space `X` there exists a continuous function
`f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
We also give versions in a regular locally compact space where one assumes that `s` is compact
and `t` is closed, in `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact`
and `exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact` (the latter providing additionally a function with
compact support).
We write a generic proof so that it applies both to normal spaces and to regular locally
compact spaces.
## Implementation notes
Most paper sources prove Urysohn's lemma using a family of open sets indexed by dyadic rational
numbers on `[0, 1]`. There are many technical difficulties with formalizing this proof (e.g., one
needs to formalize the "dyadic induction", then prove that the resulting family of open sets is
monotone). So, we formalize a slightly different proof.
Let `Urysohns.CU` be the type of pairs `(C, U)` of a closed set `C` and an open set `U` such that
`C ⊆ U`. Since `X` is a normal topological space, for each `c : CU` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u ∧ closure u ⊆ c.U`. We define `c.left` and `c.right` to be `(c.C, u)` and
`(closure u, c.U)`, respectively. Then we define a family of functions
`Urysohns.CU.approx (c : Urysohns.CU) (n : ℕ) : X → ℝ` by recursion on `n`:
* `c.approx 0` is the indicator of `c.Uᶜ`;
* `c.approx (n + 1) x = (c.left.approx n x + c.right.approx n x) / 2`.
For each `x` this is a monotone family of functions that are equal to zero on `c.C` and are equal to
one outside of `c.U`. We also have `c.approx n x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `c`, `n`, and `x`.
Let `Urysohns.CU.lim c` be the supremum (or equivalently, the limit) of `c.approx n`. Then
properties of `Urysohns.CU.approx` immediately imply that
* `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `x`;
* `c.lim` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
* `c.lim x = (c.left.lim x + c.right.lim x) / 2`.
In order to prove that `c.lim` is continuous at `x`, we prove by induction on `n : ℕ` that for `y`
in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `|c.lim y - c.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Induction base follows
from `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]`, `c.lim y ∈ [0, 1]`. For the induction step, consider two cases:
* `x ∈ c.left.U`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `y ∈ c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C`
(hence `c.right.lim x = c.right.lim y = 0`) and `|c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`.
Then
`|c.lim y - c.lim x| = |c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| / 2 ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n / 2 < (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
* otherwise, `x ∉ c.left.right.C`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have
`y ∉ c.left.right.C ⊇ c.left.left.U` (hence `c.left.left.lim x = c.left.left.lim y = 1`),
`|c.left.right.lim y - c.left.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`, and
`|c.right.lim y - c.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Combining these inequalities, the triangle
inequality, and the recurrence formula for `c.lim`, we get
`|c.lim x - c.lim y| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
The actual formalization uses `midpoint ℝ x y` instead of `(x + y) / 2` because we have more API
lemmas about `midpoint`.
## Tags
Urysohn's lemma, normal topological space, locally compact topological space
-/
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
/--
An auxiliary type for the proof of Urysohn's lemma: a pair of a closed set `C` and its open
neighborhood `U`, together with the assumption that `C` and `U` satisfy the property `P C U`.
The latter assumption will make it possible to prove simultaneously both versions of Urysohn's
lemma, in normal spaces (with `P` always true) and in locally compact spaces
(with `P C U = IsCompact C`). We put also in the structure the assumption that, for any such pair,
one may find an intermediate pair in between satisfying `P`,
to avoid carrying it around in the argument.
-/
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Set X → Prop) where
/-- The inner set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected C : Set X
/-- The outer set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected U : Set X
/-- The proof that `C` and `U` satisfy the property `P C U` -/
protected P_C_U : P C U
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
/-- The proof that we can divide `CU` pairs in half -/
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c u → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ (v : Set X), IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P c v ∧ P (closure v) u
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Set X → Prop}
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.left` is the pair `(c.C, u)`. -/
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2.1
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.right` is the pair `(closure u, c.U)`. -/
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
/-- `n`-th approximation to a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that `f = 0` on `c.C` and `f = 1`
outside of `c.U`. -/
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
| succ n ihn =>
| simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
theorem approx_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∉ c.U) : c.approx n x = 1 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 161 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
| theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 467 | 470 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
/-! # Power function on `ℂ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are complex numbers.
-/
open Real Topology Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
namespace Complex
/-- The complex power function `x ^ y`, given by `x ^ y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the
principal determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and
`0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : Pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨cpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def_of_ne_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℂ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
if_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff {x y : ℂ} :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or, ne_eq, not_not]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff_of_exponent_ne_zero {x y : ℂ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [cpow_def, *]
theorem zero_cpow_eq_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [cpow_def, eq_self_iff_true, if_true] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true] at hyp
right
exact ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [if_neg h] at hyp
left
exact ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_cpow h
· exact cpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_cpow_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : a = (0 : ℂ) ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_cpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp]
theorem one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [one_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def, ite_mul, boole_mul, mul_ite, mul_boole]
simp_all [exp_add, mul_add]
theorem cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc]
theorem cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [cpow_def, neg_eq_zero, mul_neg]
split_ifs <;> simp [exp_neg]
theorem cpow_sub {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cpow_add _ _ hx, cpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ := by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
/-- See also `Complex.cpow_int_mul'`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy <;> simp [*, zero_zpow]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_left_comm, exp_int_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_int (x y : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by rw [mul_comm, cpow_int_mul]
lemma cpow_nat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n :=
mod_cast cpow_int_mul x n y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (ofNat(n) * y) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_nat_mul x n y
lemma cpow_mul_nat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [mul_comm, cpow_nat_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_ofNat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (y * ofNat(n)) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_mul_nat x y n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cpow_natCast (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n := by simpa using cpow_nat_mul x n 1
@[simp]
lemma cpow_ofNat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℂ) = x ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_natCast x n
theorem cpow_two (x : ℂ) : x ^ (2 : ℂ) = x ^ (2 : ℕ) := cpow_ofNat x 2
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cpow_intCast (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n := by simpa using cpow_int_mul x n 1
@[simp]
theorem cpow_nat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← cpow_nat_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀, cpow_one]
assumption_mod_cast
@[simp]
lemma cpow_ofNat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(x ^ ((ofNat(n) : ℂ)⁻¹)) ^ (ofNat(n) : ℕ) = x :=
cpow_nat_inv_pow _ (NeZero.ne n)
/-- A version of `Complex.cpow_int_mul` with RHS that matches `Complex.cpow_mul`.
The assumptions on the arguments are needed
because the equality fails, e.g., for `x = -I`, `n = 2`, `y = 1/2`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℤ} (hlt : -π < n * x.arg) (hle : n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
rw [mul_comm] at hlt hle
rw [cpow_mul, cpow_intCast] <;> simpa [log_im]
/-- A version of `Complex.cpow_nat_mul` with RHS that matches `Complex.cpow_mul`.
The assumptions on the arguments are needed
because the equality fails, e.g., for `x = -I`, `n = 2`, `y = 1/2`. -/
lemma cpow_nat_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hlt : -π < n * x.arg) (hle : n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ n) ^ y :=
cpow_int_mul' hlt hle y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] (hlt : -π < OfNat.ofNat n * x.arg)
(hle : OfNat.ofNat n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n * y) = (x ^ ofNat(n)) ^ y :=
cpow_nat_mul' hlt hle y
lemma pow_cpow_nat_inv {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h₀ : n ≠ 0) (hlt : -(π / n) < x.arg) (hle : x.arg ≤ π / n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← cpow_nat_mul', mul_inv_cancel₀ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 h₀), cpow_one]
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.2 h₀.bot_lt), neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.2 h₀.bot_lt)]
lemma pow_cpow_ofNat_inv {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] (hlt : -(π / OfNat.ofNat n) < x.arg)
(hle : x.arg ≤ π / OfNat.ofNat n) :
(x ^ ofNat(n)) ^ ((OfNat.ofNat n : ℂ)⁻¹) = x :=
pow_cpow_nat_inv (NeZero.ne n) hlt hle
/-- See also `Complex.pow_cpow_ofNat_inv` for a version that also works for `x * I`, `0 ≤ x`. -/
lemma sq_cpow_two_inv {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 < x.re) : (x ^ (2 : ℕ)) ^ (2⁻¹ : ℂ) = x :=
pow_cpow_ofNat_inv (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff.2 <| .inl hx)
(arg_le_pi_div_two_iff.2 <| .inl hx.le)
theorem mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (r : ℂ) :
((a : ℂ) * (b : ℂ)) ^ r = (a : ℂ) ^ r * (b : ℂ) ^ r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr)
· simp only [cpow_zero, mul_one]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le ha with (rfl | ha')
· rw [ofReal_zero, zero_mul, zero_cpow hr, zero_mul]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hb with (rfl | hb')
· rw [ofReal_zero, mul_zero, zero_cpow hr, mul_zero]
have ha'' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha'.ne'
have hb'' : (b : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hb'.ne'
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero ha'' hb''), log_ofReal_mul ha' hb'', ofReal_log ha,
add_mul, exp_add, ← cpow_def_of_ne_zero ha'', ← cpow_def_of_ne_zero hb'']
lemma natCast_mul_natCast_cpow (m n : ℕ) (s : ℂ) : (m * n : ℂ) ^ s = m ^ s * n ^ s :=
ofReal_natCast m ▸ ofReal_natCast n ▸ mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg m.cast_nonneg n.cast_nonneg s
lemma natCast_cpow_natCast_mul (n m : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n : ℂ) ^ (m * z) = ((n : ℂ) ^ m) ^ z := by
refine cpow_nat_mul' (x := n) (n := m) ?_ ?_ z
· simp only [natCast_arg, mul_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff, pi_pos]
· simp only [natCast_arg, mul_zero, pi_pos.le]
theorem inv_cpow_eq_ite (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
x⁻¹ ^ n = if x.arg = π then conj (x ^ conj n)⁻¹ else (x ^ n)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [Complex.cpow_def, log_inv_eq_ite, inv_eq_zero, map_eq_zero, ite_mul, neg_mul,
RCLike.conj_inv, apply_ite conj, apply_ite exp, apply_ite Inv.inv, map_zero, map_one, exp_neg,
inv_one, inv_zero, ← exp_conj, map_mul, conj_conj]
split_ifs with hx hn ha ha <;> rfl
theorem inv_cpow (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : x⁻¹ ^ n = (x ^ n)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_cpow_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
/-- `Complex.inv_cpow_eq_ite` with the `ite` on the other side. -/
theorem inv_cpow_eq_ite' (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
(x ^ n)⁻¹ = if x.arg = π then conj (x⁻¹ ^ conj n) else x⁻¹ ^ n := by
rw [inv_cpow_eq_ite, apply_ite conj, conj_conj, conj_conj]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· rw [inv_cpow _ _ h]
theorem conj_cpow_eq_ite (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
conj x ^ n = if x.arg = π then x ^ n else conj (x ^ conj n) := by
simp_rw [cpow_def, map_eq_zero, apply_ite conj, map_one, map_zero, ← exp_conj, map_mul, conj_conj,
log_conj_eq_ite]
| split_ifs with hcx hn hx <;> rfl
theorem conj_cpow (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : conj x ^ n = conj (x ^ conj n) := by
rw [conj_cpow_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Complex.lean | 230 | 233 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
| toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 429 | 434 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Manuel Candales. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Manuel Candales, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
/-!
# Power of a point (intersecting chords and secants)
This file proves basic geometrical results about power of a point (intersecting chords and
secants) in spheres in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main theorems
* `mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_pi`: Intersecting Chords Theorem (Freek No. 55).
* `mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_zero`: Intersecting Secants Theorem.
-/
open Real
open EuclideanGeometry RealInnerProductSpace Real
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
namespace InnerProductGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on spheres in real inner product spaces
This section develops some results on spheres in real inner product spaces,
which are used to deduce corresponding results for Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
theorem mul_norm_eq_abs_sub_sq_norm {x y z : V} (h₁ : ∃ k : ℝ, k ≠ 1 ∧ x + y = k • (x - y))
(h₂ : ‖z - y‖ = ‖z + y‖) : ‖x - y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = |‖z + y‖ ^ 2 - ‖z - x‖ ^ 2| := by
obtain ⟨k, hk_ne_one, hk⟩ := h₁
let r := (k - 1)⁻¹ * (k + 1)
have hxy : x = r • y := by
rw [← smul_smul, eq_inv_smul_iff₀ (sub_ne_zero.mpr hk_ne_one), ← sub_eq_zero]
calc
(k - 1) • x - (k + 1) • y = k • x - x - (k • y + y) := by
simp_rw [sub_smul, add_smul, one_smul]
_ = k • x - k • y - (x + y) := by simp_rw [← sub_sub, sub_right_comm]
_ = k • (x - y) - (x + y) := by rw [← smul_sub k x y]
_ = 0 := sub_eq_zero.mpr hk.symm
have hzy : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0 := by
rwa [inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, ← norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two,
eq_comm]
have hzx : ⟪z, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [hxy, inner_smul_right, hzy, mul_zero]
calc
‖x - y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖(r - 1) • y‖ * ‖(r + 1) • y‖ := by simp [sub_smul, add_smul, hxy]
_ = ‖r - 1‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖r + 1‖ * ‖y‖) := by simp_rw [norm_smul]
_ = ‖r - 1‖ * ‖r + 1‖ * ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by ring
_ = |(r - 1) * (r + 1) * ‖y‖ ^ 2| := by simp [abs_mul]
_ = |r ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2| := by ring_nf
_ = |‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2| := by simp [hxy, norm_smul, mul_pow, sq_abs]
_ = |‖z + y‖ ^ 2 - ‖z - x‖ ^ 2| := by
simp [norm_add_sq_real, norm_sub_sq_real, hzy, hzx, abs_sub_comm]
end InnerProductGeometry
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on spheres in Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some results on spheres in Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {P : Type*} [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- If `P` is a point on the line `AB` and `Q` is equidistant from `A` and `B`, then
`AP * BP = abs (BQ ^ 2 - PQ ^ 2)`. -/
theorem mul_dist_eq_abs_sub_sq_dist {a b p q : P} (hp : ∃ k : ℝ, k ≠ 1 ∧ b -ᵥ p = k • (a -ᵥ p))
(hq : dist a q = dist b q) : dist a p * dist b p = |dist b q ^ 2 - dist p q ^ 2| := by
let m : P := midpoint ℝ a b
have h1 := vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left a p m
have h2 := vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p q m
have h3 := vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left a q m
have h : ∀ r, b -ᵥ r = m -ᵥ r + (m -ᵥ a) := fun r => by
rw [midpoint_vsub_left, ← right_vsub_midpoint, add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
iterate 4 rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V]
rw [← h1, ← h2, h, h]
rw [← h1, h] at hp
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V a q, dist_eq_norm_vsub V b q, ← h3, h] at hq
exact mul_norm_eq_abs_sub_sq_norm hp hq
/-- If `A`, `B`, `C`, `D` are cospherical and `P` is on both lines `AB` and `CD`, then
`AP * BP = CP * DP`. -/
theorem mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical {a b c d p : P} (h : Cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : Set P))
(hapb : ∃ k₁ : ℝ, k₁ ≠ 1 ∧ b -ᵥ p = k₁ • (a -ᵥ p))
(hcpd : ∃ k₂ : ℝ, k₂ ≠ 1 ∧ d -ᵥ p = k₂ • (c -ᵥ p)) :
dist a p * dist b p = dist c p * dist d p := by
obtain ⟨q, r, h'⟩ := (cospherical_def {a, b, c, d}).mp h
obtain ⟨ha, hb, hc, hd⟩ := h' a (by simp), h' b (by simp), h' c (by simp), h' d (by simp)
rw [← hd] at hc
rw [← hb] at ha
rw [mul_dist_eq_abs_sub_sq_dist hapb ha, hb, mul_dist_eq_abs_sub_sq_dist hcpd hc, hd]
/-- **Intersecting Chords Theorem**. -/
theorem mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_pi {a b c d p : P}
(h : Cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : Set P)) (hapb : ∠ a p b = π) (hcpd : ∠ c p d = π) :
dist a p * dist b p = dist c p * dist d p := by
obtain ⟨-, k₁, _, hab⟩ := angle_eq_pi_iff.mp hapb
obtain ⟨-, k₂, _, hcd⟩ := angle_eq_pi_iff.mp hcpd
| exact mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical h ⟨k₁, by linarith, hab⟩ ⟨k₂, by linarith, hcd⟩
/-- **Intersecting Secants Theorem**. -/
theorem mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical_of_angle_eq_zero {a b c d p : P}
(h : Cospherical ({a, b, c, d} : Set P)) (hab : a ≠ b) (hcd : c ≠ d) (hapb : ∠ a p b = 0)
(hcpd : ∠ c p d = 0) : dist a p * dist b p = dist c p * dist d p := by
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Sphere/Power.lean | 113 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
/-!
# Discrete quotients of a topological space.
This file defines the type of discrete quotients of a topological space,
denoted `DiscreteQuotient X`. To avoid quantifying over types, we model such
quotients as setoids whose equivalence classes are clopen.
## Definitions
1. `DiscreteQuotient X` is the type of discrete quotients of `X`.
It is endowed with a coercion to `Type`, which is defined as the
quotient associated to the setoid in question, and each such quotient
is endowed with the discrete topology.
2. Given `S : DiscreteQuotient X`, the projection `X → S` is denoted
`S.proj`.
3. When `X` is compact and `S : DiscreteQuotient X`, the space `S` is
endowed with a `Fintype` instance.
## Order structure
The type `DiscreteQuotient X` is endowed with an instance of a `SemilatticeInf` with `OrderTop`.
The partial ordering `A ≤ B` mathematically means that `B.proj` factors through `A.proj`.
The top element `⊤` is the trivial quotient, meaning that every element of `X` is collapsed
to a point. Given `h : A ≤ B`, the map `A → B` is `DiscreteQuotient.ofLE h`.
Whenever `X` is a locally connected space, the type `DiscreteQuotient X` is also endowed with an
instance of an `OrderBot`, where the bot element `⊥` is given by the `connectedComponentSetoid`,
i.e., `x ~ y` means that `x` and `y` belong to the same connected component. In particular, if `X`
is a discrete topological space, then `x ~ y` is equivalent (propositionally, not definitionally) to
`x = y`.
Given `f : C(X, Y)`, we define a predicate `DiscreteQuotient.LEComap f A B` for
`A : DiscreteQuotient X` and `B : DiscreteQuotient Y`, asserting that `f` descends to `A → B`. If
`cond : DiscreteQuotient.LEComap h A B`, the function `A → B` is obtained by
`DiscreteQuotient.map f cond`.
## Theorems
The two main results proved in this file are:
1. `DiscreteQuotient.eq_of_forall_proj_eq` which states that when `X` is compact, T₂, and totally
disconnected, any two elements of `X` are equal if their projections in `Q` agree for all
`Q : DiscreteQuotient X`.
2. `DiscreteQuotient.exists_of_compat` which states that when `X` is compact, then any
system of elements of `Q` as `Q : DiscreteQuotient X` varies, which is compatible with
respect to `DiscreteQuotient.ofLE`, must arise from some element of `X`.
## Remarks
The constructions in this file will be used to show that any profinite space is a limit
of finite discrete spaces.
-/
open Set Function TopologicalSpace Topology
variable {α X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
/-- The type of discrete quotients of a topological space. -/
@[ext]
structure DiscreteQuotient (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] extends Setoid X where
/-- For every point `x`, the set `{ y | Rel x y }` is an open set. -/
protected isOpen_setOf_rel : ∀ x, IsOpen (setOf (toSetoid x))
namespace DiscreteQuotient
variable (S : DiscreteQuotient X)
lemma toSetoid_injective : Function.Injective (@toSetoid X _)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, _ => by congr
/-- Construct a discrete quotient from a clopen set. -/
def ofIsClopen {A : Set X} (h : IsClopen A) : DiscreteQuotient X where
toSetoid := ⟨fun x y => x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A, fun _ => Iff.rfl, Iff.symm, Iff.trans⟩
isOpen_setOf_rel x := by by_cases hx : x ∈ A <;> simp [hx, h.1, h.2, ← compl_setOf]
theorem refl : ∀ x, S.toSetoid x x := S.refl'
theorem symm (x y : X) : S.toSetoid x y → S.toSetoid y x := S.symm'
theorem trans (x y z : X) : S.toSetoid x y → S.toSetoid y z → S.toSetoid x z := S.trans'
/-- The setoid whose quotient yields the discrete quotient. -/
add_decl_doc toSetoid
instance : CoeSort (DiscreteQuotient X) (Type _) :=
⟨fun S => Quotient S.toSetoid⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace S :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.toSetoid))
/-- The projection from `X` to the given discrete quotient. -/
def proj : X → S := Quotient.mk''
theorem fiber_eq (x : X) : S.proj ⁻¹' {S.proj x} = setOf (S.toSetoid x) :=
Set.ext fun _ => eq_comm.trans Quotient.eq''
theorem proj_surjective : Function.Surjective S.proj :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective
theorem proj_isQuotientMap : IsQuotientMap S.proj :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias proj_quotientMap := proj_isQuotientMap
theorem proj_continuous : Continuous S.proj :=
S.proj_isQuotientMap.continuous
instance : DiscreteTopology S :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.1 <| S.proj_surjective.forall.2 fun x => by
rw [← S.proj_isQuotientMap.isOpen_preimage, fiber_eq]
exact S.isOpen_setOf_rel _
theorem proj_isLocallyConstant : IsLocallyConstant S.proj :=
(IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous S.proj).2 S.proj_continuous
theorem isClopen_preimage (A : Set S) : IsClopen (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(isClopen_discrete A).preimage S.proj_continuous
theorem isOpen_preimage (A : Set S) : IsOpen (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(S.isClopen_preimage A).2
theorem isClosed_preimage (A : Set S) : IsClosed (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(S.isClopen_preimage A).1
theorem isClopen_setOf_rel (x : X) : IsClopen (setOf (S.toSetoid x)) := by
rw [← fiber_eq]
apply isClopen_preimage
instance : Min (DiscreteQuotient X) :=
⟨fun S₁ S₂ => ⟨S₁.1 ⊓ S₂.1, fun x => (S₁.2 x).inter (S₂.2 x)⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (DiscreteQuotient X) :=
Injective.semilatticeInf toSetoid toSetoid_injective fun _ _ => rfl
instance : OrderTop (DiscreteQuotient X) where
top := ⟨⊤, fun _ => isOpen_univ⟩
le_top a := by tauto
instance : Inhabited (DiscreteQuotient X) := ⟨⊤⟩
instance inhabitedQuotient [Inhabited X] : Inhabited S := ⟨S.proj default⟩
-- TODO: add instances about `Nonempty (Quot _)`/`Nonempty (Quotient _)`
instance [Nonempty X] : Nonempty S := Nonempty.map S.proj ‹_›
/-- The quotient by `⊤ : DiscreteQuotient X` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance : Subsingleton (⊤ : DiscreteQuotient X) where
allEq := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩; exact Quotient.sound trivial
section Comap
variable (g : C(Y, Z)) (f : C(X, Y))
/-- Comap a discrete quotient along a continuous map. -/
def comap (S : DiscreteQuotient Y) : DiscreteQuotient X where
toSetoid := Setoid.comap f S.1
isOpen_setOf_rel _ := (S.2 _).preimage f.continuous
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : S.comap (ContinuousMap.id X) = S := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp (S : DiscreteQuotient Z) : S.comap (g.comp f) = (S.comap g).comap f :=
rfl
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono {A B : DiscreteQuotient Y} (h : A ≤ B) : A.comap f ≤ B.comap f := by tauto
end Comap
section OfLE
variable {A B C : DiscreteQuotient X}
/-- The map induced by a refinement of a discrete quotient. -/
def ofLE (h : A ≤ B) : A → B :=
Quotient.map' id h
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_refl : ofLE (le_refl A) = id := by
ext ⟨⟩
rfl
theorem ofLE_refl_apply (a : A) : ofLE (le_refl A) a = a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_ofLE (h₁ : A ≤ B) (h₂ : B ≤ C) (x : A) :
ofLE h₂ (ofLE h₁ x) = ofLE (h₁.trans h₂) x := by
rcases x with ⟨⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_comp_ofLE (h₁ : A ≤ B) (h₂ : B ≤ C) : ofLE h₂ ∘ ofLE h₁ = ofLE (le_trans h₁ h₂) :=
funext <| ofLE_ofLE _ _
theorem ofLE_continuous (h : A ≤ B) : Continuous (ofLE h) :=
continuous_of_discreteTopology
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_proj (h : A ≤ B) (x : X) : ofLE h (A.proj x) = B.proj x :=
Quotient.sound' (B.refl _)
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_comp_proj (h : A ≤ B) : ofLE h ∘ A.proj = B.proj :=
funext <| ofLE_proj _
end OfLE
/-- When `X` is a locally connected space, there is an `OrderBot` instance on
`DiscreteQuotient X`. The bottom element is given by `connectedComponentSetoid X`
-/
instance [LocallyConnectedSpace X] : OrderBot (DiscreteQuotient X) where
bot :=
{ toSetoid := connectedComponentSetoid X
isOpen_setOf_rel := fun x => by
convert isOpen_connectedComponent (x := x)
ext y
simpa only [connectedComponentSetoid, ← connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem] using eq_comm }
bot_le S := fun x y (h : connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y) =>
(S.isClopen_setOf_rel x).connectedComponent_subset (S.refl _) <| h.symm ▸ mem_connectedComponent
@[simp]
theorem proj_bot_eq [LocallyConnectedSpace X] {x y : X} :
proj ⊥ x = proj ⊥ y ↔ connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
Quotient.eq''
theorem proj_bot_inj [DiscreteTopology X] {x y : X} : proj ⊥ x = proj ⊥ y ↔ x = y := by simp
theorem proj_bot_injective [DiscreteTopology X] : Injective (⊥ : DiscreteQuotient X).proj :=
fun _ _ => proj_bot_inj.1
theorem proj_bot_bijective [DiscreteTopology X] : Bijective (⊥ : DiscreteQuotient X).proj :=
⟨proj_bot_injective, proj_surjective _⟩
section Map
variable (f : C(X, Y)) (A A' : DiscreteQuotient X) (B B' : DiscreteQuotient Y)
/-- Given `f : C(X, Y)`, `DiscreteQuotient.LEComap f A B` is defined as
`A ≤ B.comap f`. Mathematically this means that `f` descends to a morphism `A → B`. -/
def LEComap : Prop :=
A ≤ B.comap f
theorem leComap_id : LEComap (.id X) A A := le_rfl
variable {A A' B B'} {f} {g : C(Y, Z)} {C : DiscreteQuotient Z}
@[simp]
theorem leComap_id_iff : LEComap (ContinuousMap.id X) A A' ↔ A ≤ A' :=
Iff.rfl
theorem LEComap.comp : LEComap g B C → LEComap f A B → LEComap (g.comp f) A C := by tauto
| @[mono]
| Mathlib/Topology/DiscreteQuotient.lean | 266 | 266 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Grayson Burton, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.WithTopBot
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.WithBotTop
/-!
# The covering relation
This file proves properties of the covering relation in an order.
We say that `b` *covers* `a` if `a < b` and there is no element in between.
We say that `b` *weakly covers* `a` if `a ≤ b` and there is no element between `a` and `b`.
In a partial order this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ a = b`,
in a preorder this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a)`
## Notation
* `a ⋖ b` means that `b` covers `a`.
* `a ⩿ b` means that `b` weakly covers `a`.
-/
open Set OrderDual
variable {α β : Type*}
section WeaklyCovers
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.le (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1
theorem WCovBy.refl (a : α) : a ⩿ a :=
⟨le_rfl, fun _ hc => hc.not_lt⟩
@[simp] lemma WCovBy.rfl : a ⩿ a := WCovBy.refl a
protected theorem Eq.wcovBy (h : a = b) : a ⩿ b :=
h ▸ WCovBy.rfl
theorem wcovBy_of_le_of_le (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h1, fun _ hac hcb => (hac.trans hcb).not_le h2⟩
alias LE.le.wcovBy_of_le := wcovBy_of_le_of_le
theorem AntisymmRel.wcovBy (h : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ b :=
wcovBy_of_le_of_le h.1 h.2
theorem WCovBy.wcovBy_iff_le (hab : a ⩿ b) : b ⩿ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h.le, fun h => h.wcovBy_of_le hab.le⟩
theorem wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_wcovBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⩿ c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans hbc.le, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ c ↔ b ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_wcovBy, hab.trans_wcovBy⟩
theorem WCovBy.trans_antisymm_rel (hab : a ⩿ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.le.trans hbc.1, fun _ had hdc => hab.2 had <| hdc.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⩿ a ↔ c ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab.symm⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_wcovBy_iff (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a ⩿ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [WCovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
instance WCovBy.isRefl : IsRefl α (· ⩿ ·) :=
⟨WCovBy.refl⟩
theorem WCovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h.2 hx.1 hx.2
theorem wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⩿ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le' (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem WCovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⩿ f b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨f.le_iff_le.mp h.le, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem WCovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⩿ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⩿ f b := by
refine ⟨f.monotone hab.le, fun c ha hb => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := h.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨ha.le, hb.le⟩
rw [f.lt_iff_lt] at ha hb
exact hab.2 ha hb
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⩿ f b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h2 => h2.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_wcovBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⩿ e b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⩿ toDual a ↔ a ⩿ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⩿ ofDual b ↔ b ⩿ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff
theorem OrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ↪o β) {x y : α} (h : f x ⩿ f y) : x ⩿ y := by
use f.le_iff_le.1 h.1
intro a
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, ← f.lt_iff_lt]
apply h.2
theorem OrderIso.map_wcovBy {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : f x ⩿ f y ↔ x ⩿ y := by
use f.toOrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x, ← f.symm_apply_apply y]
exact f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b := by
rcases h2.eq_or_lt with (h2 | h2); · exact Or.inl h2.symm
rcases h3.eq_or_lt with (h3 | h3); · exact Or.inr h3
exact (h.2 h2 h3).elim
/-- An `iff` version of `WCovBy.eq_or_eq` and `wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem wcovBy_iff_le_and_eq_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.le, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
theorem WCovBy.le_and_le_iff (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ c ∧ c ≤ b ↔ c = a ∨ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h2 => h.eq_or_eq h2.1 h2.2, ?_⟩; rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨le_rfl, h.le⟩, ⟨h.le, le_rfl⟩]
theorem WCovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} := by
ext c
exact h.le_and_le_iff
theorem WCovBy.Ico_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ico a b ⊆ {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff, pair_comm]
theorem WCovBy.Ioc_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioc a b ⊆ {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
end PartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.sup_eq (hac : a ⩿ c) (hbc : b ⩿ c) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊔ b = c :=
(sup_le hac.le hbc.le).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
hab.lt_sup_or_lt_sup.elim (fun h' => hac.2 h' h) fun h' => hbc.2 h' h
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.inf_eq (hca : c ⩿ a) (hcb : c ⩿ b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b = c :=
(le_inf hca.le hcb.le).eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.inf_lt_or_inf_lt.elim (hca.2 h) (hcb.2 h)
end SemilatticeInf
end WeaklyCovers
section LT
variable [LT α] {a b : α}
theorem CovBy.lt (h : a ⋖ b) : a < b :=
h.1
/-- If `a < b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_covBy_iff (h : a < b) : ¬a ⋖ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [CovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
alias ⟨exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy, _⟩ := not_covBy_iff
alias LT.lt.exists_lt_lt := exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy
/-- In a dense order, nothing covers anything. -/
theorem not_covBy [DenselyOrdered α] : ¬a ⋖ b := fun h =>
let ⟨_, hc⟩ := exists_between h.1
h.2 hc.1 hc.2
theorem denselyOrdered_iff_forall_not_covBy : DenselyOrdered α ↔ ∀ a b : α, ¬a ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h _ _ => @not_covBy _ _ _ _ h, fun h =>
⟨fun _ _ hab => exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy hab <| h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toDual_covBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⋖ toDual a ↔ a ⋖ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⋖ ofDual b ↔ b ⋖ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
alias ⟨_, CovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_covBy_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, CovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.le (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1.le
protected theorem CovBy.ne (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≠ b :=
h.lt.ne
theorem CovBy.ne' (h : a ⋖ b) : b ≠ a :=
h.lt.ne'
protected theorem CovBy.wcovBy (h : a ⋖ b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h.le, h.2⟩
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_not_le (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : ¬b ≤ a) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_not_le h2, h.2⟩
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_lt (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a < b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h2, h.2⟩
lemma CovBy.of_le_of_lt (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b < c) : b ⋖ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma CovBy.of_lt_of_le (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a < b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem not_covBy_of_lt_of_lt (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b < c) : ¬a ⋖ c :=
(not_covBy_iff (h₁.trans h₂)).2 ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a < b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_lt h.2⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt.not_le⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_not_le h.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun h' => h.covBy_of_not_le fun hba => h' ⟨h.le, hba⟩,
fun h' => h'.elim (fun h => h.wcovBy) fun h => h.1.wcovBy_of_le h.2⟩
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_le_and_le, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_covBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans_lt hbc.lt, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem covBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⋖ c ↔ b ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_covBy, hab.trans_covBy⟩
theorem CovBy.trans_antisymmRel (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.lt.trans_le hbc.1, fun _ had hdb => hab.2 had <| hdb.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem covBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⋖ a ↔ c ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab.symm⟩
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder α (· ⩿ ·) (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ =>
covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le.trans <| and_congr_right fun h => h.wcovBy_iff_le.not.symm⟩
instance CovBy.isIrrefl : IsIrrefl α (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ ha => ha.ne rfl⟩
theorem CovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
h.wcovBy.Ioo_eq
theorem covBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem CovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⋖ f b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨f.lt_iff_lt.mp h.lt, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem CovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⋖ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⋖ f b :=
(hab.wcovBy.image f h).covBy_of_lt <| f.strictMono hab.lt
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⋖ f b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨CovBy.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_covBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⋖ e b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_covBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
theorem covBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a < b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem OrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ↪o β) {x y : α} (h : f x ⋖ f y) : x ⋖ y := by
use f.lt_iff_lt.1 h.1
intro a
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, ← f.lt_iff_lt]
apply h.2
theorem OrderIso.map_covBy {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : f x ⋖ f y ↔ x ⋖ y := by
use f.toOrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x, ← f.symm_apply_apply y]
exact f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_ne (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≠ b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_ne h2, h.2⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_ne : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.ne⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_ne h.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a = b := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le]
theorem wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy : a ⩿ b ↔ a = b ∨ a ⋖ b :=
wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq.trans or_comm
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_eq, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq
alias ⟨WCovBy.eq_or_covBy, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy
theorem CovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⋖ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b :=
h.wcovBy.eq_or_eq h2 h3
/-- An `iff` version of `CovBy.eq_or_eq` and `covBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem covBy_iff_lt_and_eq_or_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.lt, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec covBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
theorem CovBy.Ico_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ico a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_left h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Ioc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioc a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_right h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} :=
h.wcovBy.Icc_eq
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.Ioi_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioi a = Ici b := by
rw [← Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Iio_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Iio b = Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_union_Ioo_eq_Iio h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, union_empty]
theorem WCovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hcb : c < b) : c ≤ a :=
not_lt.1 fun hac => hab.2 hac hcb
theorem WCovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hac : a < c) : b ≤ c :=
not_lt.1 <| hab.2 hac
theorem CovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⋖ b) : c < b → c ≤ a :=
hab.wcovBy.le_of_lt
theorem CovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⋖ b) : a < c → b ≤ c :=
hab.wcovBy.ge_of_gt
theorem CovBy.unique_left (ha : a ⋖ c) (hb : b ⋖ c) : a = b :=
(hb.le_of_lt ha.lt).antisymm <| ha.le_of_lt hb.lt
theorem CovBy.unique_right (hb : a ⋖ b) (hc : a ⋖ c) : b = c :=
(hb.ge_of_gt hc.lt).antisymm <| hc.ge_of_gt hb.lt
/-- If `a`, `b`, `c` are consecutive and `a < x < c` then `x = b`. -/
theorem CovBy.eq_of_between {x : α} (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) (hax : a < x) (hxc : x < c) :
x = b :=
le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt fun h => hbc.2 h hxc) (le_of_not_lt <| hab.2 hax)
theorem covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, z < y ↔ z ≤ x where
mp := fun hx _z ↦ ⟨hx.le_of_lt, fun hz ↦ hz.trans_lt hx.lt⟩
mpr := fun H ↦ ⟨H.2 le_rfl, fun _z hx hz ↦ (H.1 hz).not_lt hx⟩
theorem covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, z ≤ x ↔ z < y := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left, iff_comm]
theorem covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, x < z ↔ y ≤ z := by
trans ∀ {z}, ¬ z ≤ x ↔ ¬ z < y
· simp_rw [covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left, not_iff_not]
· simp
theorem covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_right {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, y ≤ z ↔ x < z := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right, iff_comm]
alias ⟨CovBy.lt_iff_le_left, _⟩ := covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left
alias ⟨CovBy.le_iff_lt_left, _⟩ := covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left
alias ⟨CovBy.lt_iff_le_right, _⟩ := covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right
alias ⟨CovBy.le_iff_lt_right, _⟩ := covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_right
/-- If `a < b` then there exist `a' > a` and `b' < b` such that `Set.Iio a'` is strictly to the left
of `Set.Ioi b'`. -/
lemma LT.lt.exists_disjoint_Iio_Ioi (h : a < b) :
∃ a' > a, ∃ b' < b, ∀ x < a', ∀ y > b', x < y := by
by_cases h' : a ⋖ b
· exact ⟨b, h, a, h, fun x hx y hy => hx.trans_le <| h'.ge_of_gt hy⟩
· rcases h.exists_lt_lt h' with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, ha, c, hb, fun _ h₁ _ => lt_trans h₁⟩
end LinearOrder
namespace Bool
@[simp] theorem wcovBy_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b := by unfold WCovBy; decide
@[simp] theorem covBy_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a ⋖ b ↔ a < b := by unfold CovBy; decide
instance instDecidableRelWCovBy : DecidableRel (· ⩿ · : Bool → Bool → Prop) := fun _ _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ wcovBy_iff.symm
instance instDecidableRelCovBy : DecidableRel (· ⋖ · : Bool → Bool → Prop) := fun _ _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ covBy_iff.symm
end Bool
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma wcovBy_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⩿ insert x s := by
refine wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (subset_insert x s) fun t hst h2t => ?_
by_cases h : x ∈ t
· exact Or.inr (subset_antisymm h2t <| insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨h, hst⟩)
· refine Or.inl (subset_antisymm ?_ hst)
rwa [← diff_singleton_eq_self h, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_wcovBy (s : Set α) (a : α) : s \ {a} ⩿ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· convert wcovBy_insert a _
ext
simp [ha]
· simp [ha]
@[simp] lemma covBy_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⋖ insert a s :=
(wcovBy_insert _ _).covBy_of_lt <| ssubset_insert ha
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_covBy (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ {a} ⋖ s :=
⟨sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _, (sdiff_singleton_wcovBy _ _).2⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_insert (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_insert.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssuperset <| h.2 <| ssubset_insert ha).symm⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssubset fun h' ↦ h.2 h' <|
sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _).symm⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_insert : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_insert, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact covBy_insert ha⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_sdiff_singleton : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact sdiff_singleton_covBy ha⟩
end Set
section Relation
open Relation
lemma wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] : ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
ext x y; simp_rw [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, @eq_comm _ x, reflGen_iff]
lemma transGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
TransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, transGen_reflGen]
lemma reflTransGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
ReflTransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, reflTransGen_reflGen]
end Relation
namespace Prod
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β} {x y : α × β}
@[simp]
theorem swap_wcovBy_swap : x.swap ⩿ y.swap ↔ x ⩿ y :=
apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
@[simp]
theorem swap_covBy_swap : x.swap ⋖ y.swap ↔ x ⋖ y :=
apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
theorem fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy : x ⩿ y → x.1 = y.1 ∨ x.2 = y.2 := by
refine fun h => of_not_not fun hab => ?_
push_neg at hab
exact
h.2 (mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inl ⟨hab.1.lt_of_le h.1.1, le_rfl⟩)
(mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inr ⟨le_rfl, hab.2.lt_of_le h.1.2⟩)
theorem _root_.WCovBy.fst (h : x ⩿ y) : x.1 ⩿ y.1 :=
⟨h.1.1, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_left.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h₂.le, h.1.2⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.1⟩⟩
theorem _root_.WCovBy.snd (h : x ⩿ y) : x.2 ⩿ y.2 :=
⟨h.1.2, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_right.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h.1.1, h₂.le⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.2⟩⟩
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⩿ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ := by
refine ⟨WCovBy.fst, (And.imp mk_le_mk_iff_left.2) fun h c h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
have : c.2 = b := h₂.le.2.antisymm h₁.le.2
rw [← @Prod.mk.eta _ _ c, this, mk_lt_mk_iff_left] at h₁ h₂
exact h h₁ h₂
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⩿ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⩿ b₂ :=
swap_wcovBy_swap.trans mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⋖ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⋖ a₂ := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left, mk_lt_mk_iff_left]
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⋖ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⋖ b₂ := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right, mk_lt_mk_iff_right]
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff : (a₁, b₁) ⩿ (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ ⩿ b₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | rfl : a₁ = a₂ ∨ b₁ = b₂ := fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy h
· exact Or.inr ⟨mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right.1 h, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left.1 h, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨h, rfl⟩)
· exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left.2 h
· exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right.2 h
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff : (a₁, b₁) ⋖ (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ ⋖ a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ ⋖ b₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | rfl : a₁ = a₂ ∨ b₁ = b₂ := fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy h.wcovBy
· exact Or.inr ⟨mk_covBy_mk_iff_right.1 h, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨mk_covBy_mk_iff_left.1 h, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨h, rfl⟩)
· exact mk_covBy_mk_iff_left.2 h
· exact mk_covBy_mk_iff_right.2 h
theorem wcovBy_iff : x ⩿ y ↔ x.1 ⩿ y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ x.2 ⩿ y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 := by
cases x
cases y
exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff
theorem covBy_iff : x ⋖ y ↔ x.1 ⋖ y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ x.2 ⋖ y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 := by
cases x
cases y
exact mk_covBy_mk_iff
end Prod
namespace WithTop
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_wcovBy_coe : (a : WithTop α) ⩿ b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff OrderEmbedding.withTopCoe <| by
simp [WithTop.range_coe, ordConnected_Iio]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_covBy_coe : (a : WithTop α) ⋖ b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff OrderEmbedding.withTopCoe <| by
simp [WithTop.range_coe, ordConnected_Iio]
@[simp] lemma coe_covBy_top : (a : WithTop α) ⋖ ⊤ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [covBy_iff_Ioo_eq, ← image_coe_Ioi, coe_lt_top, image_eq_empty,
true_and, Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
|
@[simp] lemma coe_wcovBy_top : (a : WithTop α) ⩿ ⊤ ↔ IsMax a := by
| Mathlib/Order/Cover.lean | 584 | 585 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrongEpi
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Factorization
/-!
# Categorical images
We define the categorical image of `f` as a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism `m`,
so that `m` factors through the `m'` in any other such factorisation.
## Main definitions
* A `MonoFactorisation` is a factorisation `f = e ≫ m`, where `m` is a monomorphism
* `IsImage F` means that a given mono factorisation `F` has the universal property of the image.
* `HasImage f` means that there is some image factorization for the morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`.
* In this case, `image f` is some image object (selected with choice), `image.ι f : image f ⟶ Y`
is the monomorphism `m` of the factorisation and `factorThruImage f : X ⟶ image f` is the
morphism `e`.
* `HasImages C` means that every morphism in `C` has an image.
* Let `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : P ⟶ Q` be morphisms in `C`, which we will represent as objects of the
arrow category `Arrow C`. Then `sq : f ⟶ g` is a commutative square in `C`. If `f` and `g` have
images, then `HasImageMap sq` represents the fact that there is a morphism
`i : image f ⟶ image g` making the diagram
X ----→ image f ----→ Y
| | |
| | |
↓ ↓ ↓
P ----→ image g ----→ Q
commute, where the top row is the image factorisation of `f`, the bottom row is the image
factorisation of `g`, and the outer rectangle is the commutative square `sq`.
* If a category `HasImages`, then `HasImageMaps` means that every commutative square admits an
image map.
* If a category `HasImages`, then `HasStrongEpiImages` means that the morphism to the image is
always a strong epimorphism.
## Main statements
* When `C` has equalizers, the morphism `e` appearing in an image factorisation is an epimorphism.
* When `C` has strong epi images, then these images admit image maps.
## Future work
* TODO: coimages, and abelian categories.
* TODO: connect this with existing working in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
-/
noncomputable section
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- A factorisation of a morphism `f = e ≫ m`, with `m` monic. -/
structure MonoFactorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) where
I : C -- Porting note: violates naming conventions but can't think a better replacement
m : I ⟶ Y
[m_mono : Mono m]
e : X ⟶ I
fac : e ≫ m = f := by aesop_cat
attribute [inherit_doc MonoFactorisation] MonoFactorisation.I MonoFactorisation.m
MonoFactorisation.m_mono MonoFactorisation.e MonoFactorisation.fac
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoFactorisation.fac
attribute [instance] MonoFactorisation.m_mono
namespace MonoFactorisation
/-- The obvious factorisation of a monomorphism through itself. -/
def self [Mono f] : MonoFactorisation f where
I := X
m := f
e := 𝟙 X
-- I'm not sure we really need this, but the linter says that an inhabited instance
-- ought to exist...
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (MonoFactorisation f) := ⟨self f⟩
variable {f}
/-- The morphism `m` in a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism is uniquely
determined. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hI : F.I = F'.I)
(hm : F.m = eqToHom hI ≫ F'.m) : F = F' := by
obtain ⟨_, Fm, _, Ffac⟩ := F; obtain ⟨_, Fm', _, Ffac'⟩ := F'
cases hI
simp? at hm says simp only [eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp] at hm
congr
apply (cancel_mono Fm).1
| rw [Ffac, hm, Ffac']
/-- Any mono factorisation of `f` gives a mono factorisation of `f ≫ g` when `g` is a mono. -/
@[simps]
def compMono (F : MonoFactorisation f) {Y' : C} (g : Y ⟶ Y') [Mono g] :
MonoFactorisation (f ≫ g) where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ g
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Images.lean | 108 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Damiano Testa, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Division
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Induction on polynomials
This file contains lemmas dealing with different flavours of induction on polynomials.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
/-- `divX p` returns a polynomial `q` such that `q * X + C (p.coeff 0) = p`.
It can be used in a semiring where the usual division algorithm is not possible -/
def divX (p : R[X]) : R[X] :=
⟨AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf p.toFinsupp 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_divX : (divX p).coeff n = p.coeff (n + 1) := by
rw [add_comm]; cases p; rfl
theorem divX_mul_X_add (p : R[X]) : divX p * X + C (p.coeff 0) = p :=
ext <| by rintro ⟨_ | _⟩ <;> simp [coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_divX_add (p : R[X]) : X * divX p + C (p.coeff 0) = p :=
ext <| by rintro ⟨_ | _⟩ <;> simp [coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_mul_X]
| @[simp]
theorem divX_C (a : R) : divX (C a) = 0 :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Inductions.lean | 50 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FunProp.Attr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Measurability
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file defines measurable spaces and measurable functions.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function
-/
assert_not_exists Covariant MonoidWithZero
open Set Encodable Function Equiv
variable {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {s t u : Set α}
/-- A measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra. -/
@[class] structure MeasurableSpace (α : Type*) where
/-- Predicate saying that a given set is measurable. Use `MeasurableSet` in the root namespace
instead. -/
MeasurableSet' : Set α → Prop
/-- The empty set is a measurable set. Use `MeasurableSet.empty` instead. -/
measurableSet_empty : MeasurableSet' ∅
/-- The complement of a measurable set is a measurable set. Use `MeasurableSet.compl` instead. -/
measurableSet_compl : ∀ s, MeasurableSet' s → MeasurableSet' sᶜ
/-- The union of a sequence of measurable sets is a measurable set. Use a more general
`MeasurableSet.iUnion` instead. -/
measurableSet_iUnion : ∀ f : ℕ → Set α, (∀ i, MeasurableSet' (f i)) → MeasurableSet' (⋃ i, f i)
instance [h : MeasurableSpace α] : MeasurableSpace αᵒᵈ := h
/-- `MeasurableSet s` means that `s` is measurable (in the ambient measure space on `α`) -/
def MeasurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] (s : Set α) : Prop :=
‹MeasurableSpace α›.MeasurableSet' s
/-- Notation for `MeasurableSet` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra. -/
scoped[MeasureTheory] notation "MeasurableSet[" m "]" => @MeasurableSet _ m
open MeasureTheory
section
open scoped symmDiff
@[simp, measurability]
theorem MeasurableSet.empty [MeasurableSpace α] : MeasurableSet (∅ : Set α) :=
MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_empty _
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.compl : MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet sᶜ :=
MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_compl _ s
protected theorem MeasurableSet.of_compl (h : MeasurableSet sᶜ) : MeasurableSet s :=
compl_compl s ▸ h.compl
@[simp]
theorem MeasurableSet.compl_iff : MeasurableSet sᶜ ↔ MeasurableSet s :=
⟨.of_compl, .compl⟩
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.univ : MeasurableSet (univ : Set α) :=
.of_compl <| by simp
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurableSet [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} : MeasurableSet s :=
Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
theorem MeasurableSet.congr {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : s = t) : MeasurableSet t := by
rwa [← h]
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.iUnion [Countable ι] ⦃f : ι → Set α⦄
(h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b, f b) := by
| cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean | 103 | 104 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.DensityTheorem
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
/-!
# Covering theorems for Lebesgue measure in one dimension
We have a general theory of covering theorems for doubling measures, developed notably
in `DensityTheorem.lean`. In this file, we expand the API for this theory in one dimension,
by showing that intervals belong to the relevant Vitali family.
-/
open Set MeasureTheory IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure Filter
open scoped Topology
namespace Real
theorem Icc_mem_vitaliFamily_at_right {x y : ℝ} (hxy : x < y) :
Icc x y ∈ (vitaliFamily (volume : Measure ℝ) 1).setsAt x := by
| rw [Icc_eq_closedBall]
refine closedBall_mem_vitaliFamily_of_dist_le_mul _ ?_ (by linarith)
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_of_nonneg] <;> linarith
theorem tendsto_Icc_vitaliFamily_right (x : ℝ) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/OneDim.lean | 26 | 30 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The sign of a `Real.Angle` is `0` if the angle is `0` or `π`, `1` if the angle is strictly
between `0` and `π` and `-1` is the angle is strictly between `-π` and `0`. It is defined as the
sign of the sine of the angle. -/
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 758 | 759 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplexBiprod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.IsInvertedBy
/-! The homotopy cofiber of a morphism of homological complexes
In this file, we construct the homotopy cofiber of a morphism `φ : F ⟶ G`
between homological complexes in `HomologicalComplex C c`. In degree `i`,
it is isomorphic to `(F.X j) ⊞ (G.X i)` if there is a `j` such that `c.Rel i j`,
and `G.X i` otherwise. (This is also known as the mapping cone of `φ`. Under
the name `CochainComplex.mappingCone`, a specific API shall be developed
for the case of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`.)
When we assume `hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j` (which holds in the case of chain complexes,
or cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`), then for any homological complex `K`,
there is a bijection `HomologicalComplex.homotopyCofiber.descEquiv φ K hc`
between `homotopyCofiber φ ⟶ K` and the tuples `(α, hα)` with
`α : G ⟶ K` and `hα : Homotopy (φ ≫ α) 0`.
We shall also study the cylinder of a homological complex `K`: this is the
homotopy cofiber of the morphism `biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K) : K ⟶ K ⊞ K`.
Then, a morphism `K.cylinder ⟶ M` is determined by the data of two
morphisms `φ₀ φ₁ : K ⟶ M` and a homotopy `h : Homotopy φ₀ φ₁`,
see `cylinder.desc`. There is also a homotopy equivalence
`cylinder.homotopyEquiv K : HomotopyEquiv K.cylinder K`. From the construction of
the cylinder, we deduce the lemma `Homotopy.map_eq_of_inverts_homotopyEquivalences`
which assert that if a functor inverts homotopy equivalences, then the image of
two homotopic maps are equal.
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*} {c : ComplexShape ι} {F G K : HomologicalComplex C c} (φ : F ⟶ G)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `φ : F ⟶ G` has a homotopy cofiber if for all
indices `i` and `j` such that `c.Rel i j`, the binary biproduct `F.X j ⊞ G.X i` exists. -/
class HasHomotopyCofiber (φ : F ⟶ G) : Prop where
hasBinaryBiproduct (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) : HasBinaryBiproduct (F.X j) (G.X i)
instance [HasBinaryBiproducts C] : HasHomotopyCofiber φ where
hasBinaryBiproduct _ _ _ := inferInstance
variable [HasHomotopyCofiber φ] [DecidableRel c.Rel]
namespace homotopyCofiber
/-- The `X` field of the homological complex `homotopyCofiber φ`. -/
noncomputable def X (i : ι) : C :=
if hi : c.Rel i (c.next i)
then
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hi
(F.X (c.next i)) ⊞ (G.X i)
else G.X i
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(homotopyCofiber φ).X i ≅ F.X j ⊞ G.X i` when `c.Rel i j`. -/
noncomputable def XIsoBiprod (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) [HasBinaryBiproduct (F.X j) (G.X i)] :
X φ i ≅ F.X j ⊞ G.X i :=
eqToIso (by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
apply dif_pos hij)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(homotopyCofiber φ).X i ≅ G.X i` when `¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)`. -/
noncomputable def XIso (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
X φ i ≅ G.X i :=
eqToIso (dif_neg hi)
/-- The second projection `(homotopyCofiber φ).X i ⟶ G.X i`. -/
noncomputable def sndX (i : ι) : X φ i ⟶ G.X i :=
if hi : c.Rel i (c.next i)
then
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hi
(XIsoBiprod φ _ _ hi).hom ≫ biprod.snd
else
(XIso φ i hi).hom
/-- The right inclusion `G.X i ⟶ (homotopyCofiber φ).X i`. -/
noncomputable def inrX (i : ι) : G.X i ⟶ X φ i :=
if hi : c.Rel i (c.next i)
then
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hi
biprod.inr ≫ (XIsoBiprod φ _ _ hi).inv
else
(XIso φ i hi).inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inrX_sndX (i : ι) : inrX φ i ≫ sndX φ i = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [sndX, inrX]
split_ifs with hi <;> simp
@[reassoc]
lemma sndX_inrX (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
sndX φ i ≫ inrX φ i = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [sndX, inrX]
simp only [dif_neg hi, Iso.hom_inv_id]
/-- The first projection `(homotopyCofiber φ).X i ⟶ F.X j` when `c.Rel i j`. -/
noncomputable def fstX (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) : X φ i ⟶ F.X j :=
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hij
(XIsoBiprod φ i j hij).hom ≫ biprod.fst
/-- The left inclusion `F.X i ⟶ (homotopyCofiber φ).X j` when `c.Rel j i`. -/
noncomputable def inlX (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) : F.X i ⟶ X φ j :=
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hij
biprod.inl ≫ (XIsoBiprod φ j i hij).inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inlX_fstX (i j : ι ) (hij : c.Rel j i) :
inlX φ i j hij ≫ fstX φ j i hij = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inlX, fstX]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inlX_sndX (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) :
inlX φ i j hij ≫ sndX φ j = 0 := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
simp [inlX, sndX, dif_pos hij]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inrX_fstX (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) :
inrX φ i ≫ fstX φ i j hij = 0 := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
simp [inrX, fstX, dif_pos hij]
/-- The `d` field of the homological complex `homotopyCofiber φ`. -/
noncomputable def d (i j : ι) : X φ i ⟶ X φ j :=
if hij : c.Rel i j
then
(if hj : c.Rel j (c.next j) then -fstX φ i j hij ≫ F.d _ _ ≫ inlX φ _ _ hj else 0) +
fstX φ i j hij ≫ φ.f j ≫ inrX φ j + sndX φ i ≫ G.d i j ≫ inrX φ j
else
0
lemma ext_to_X (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) {A : C} {f g : A ⟶ X φ i}
(h₁ : f ≫ fstX φ i j hij = g ≫ fstX φ i j hij) (h₂ : f ≫ sndX φ i = g ≫ sndX φ i) :
f = g := by
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hij
rw [← cancel_mono (XIsoBiprod φ i j hij).hom]
apply biprod.hom_ext
· simpa using h₁
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
simpa [sndX, dif_pos hij] using h₂
lemma ext_to_X' (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) {A : C} {f g : A ⟶ X φ i}
(h : f ≫ sndX φ i = g ≫ sndX φ i) : f = g := by
rw [← cancel_mono (XIso φ i hi).hom]
simpa only [sndX, dif_neg hi] using h
lemma ext_from_X (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) {A : C} {f g : X φ j ⟶ A}
(h₁ : inlX φ i j hij ≫ f = inlX φ i j hij ≫ g) (h₂ : inrX φ j ≫ f = inrX φ j ≫ g) :
f = g := by
haveI := HasHomotopyCofiber.hasBinaryBiproduct φ _ _ hij
rw [← cancel_epi (XIsoBiprod φ j i hij).inv]
apply biprod.hom_ext'
· simpa [inlX] using h₁
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
simpa [inrX, dif_pos hij] using h₂
lemma ext_from_X' (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) {A : C} {f g : X φ i ⟶ A}
(h : inrX φ i ≫ f = inrX φ i ≫ g) : f = g := by
rw [← cancel_epi (XIso φ i hi).inv]
simpa only [inrX, dif_neg hi] using h
@[reassoc]
lemma d_fstX (i j k : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) (hjk : c.Rel j k) :
d φ i j ≫ fstX φ j k hjk = -fstX φ i j hij ≫ F.d j k := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hjk
simp [d, dif_pos hij, dif_pos hjk]
@[reassoc]
lemma d_sndX (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) :
d φ i j ≫ sndX φ j = fstX φ i j hij ≫ φ.f j + sndX φ i ≫ G.d i j := by
dsimp [d]
split_ifs with hij <;> simp
@[reassoc]
lemma inlX_d (i j k : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) (hjk : c.Rel j k) :
inlX φ j i hij ≫ d φ i j = -F.d j k ≫ inlX φ k j hjk + φ.f j ≫ inrX φ j := by
apply ext_to_X φ j k hjk
· dsimp
simp [d_fstX φ _ _ _ hij hjk]
· simp [d_sndX φ _ _ hij]
@[reassoc]
lemma inlX_d' (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j) (hj : ¬ c.Rel j (c.next j)) :
inlX φ j i hij ≫ d φ i j = φ.f j ≫ inrX φ j := by
apply ext_to_X' _ _ hj
simp [d_sndX φ i j hij]
lemma shape (i j : ι) (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
d φ i j = 0 :=
dif_neg hij
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inrX_d (i j : ι) :
inrX φ i ≫ d φ i j = G.d i j ≫ inrX φ j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hj : c.Rel j (c.next j)
· apply ext_to_X _ _ _ hj
· simp [d_fstX φ _ _ _ hij]
· simp [d_sndX φ _ _ hij]
· apply ext_to_X' _ _ hj
simp [d_sndX φ _ _ hij]
· rw [shape φ _ _ hij, G.shape _ _ hij, zero_comp, comp_zero]
end homotopyCofiber
/-- The homotopy cofiber of a morphism of homological complexes,
also known as the mapping cone. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def homotopyCofiber : HomologicalComplex C c where
X i := homotopyCofiber.X φ i
d i j := homotopyCofiber.d φ i j
shape i j hij := homotopyCofiber.shape φ i j hij
d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk := by
apply homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X φ j i hij
· dsimp
simp only [comp_zero, homotopyCofiber.inlX_d_assoc φ i j k hij hjk,
add_comp, assoc, homotopyCofiber.inrX_d, Hom.comm_assoc, neg_comp]
by_cases hk : c.Rel k (c.next k)
· simp [homotopyCofiber.inlX_d φ j k _ hjk hk]
· simp [homotopyCofiber.inlX_d' φ j k hjk hk]
· simp
namespace homotopyCofiber
/-- The right inclusion `G ⟶ homotopyCofiber φ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def inr : G ⟶ homotopyCofiber φ where
f i := inrX φ i
section
/-- The composition `φ ≫ mappingCone.inr φ` is homotopic to `0`. -/
noncomputable def inrCompHomotopy (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j) :
Homotopy (φ ≫ inr φ) 0 where
hom i j :=
if hij : c.Rel j i then inlX φ i j hij else 0
zero _ _ hij := dif_neg hij
comm j := by
obtain ⟨i, hij⟩ := hc j
rw [prevD_eq _ hij, dif_pos hij]
by_cases hj : c.Rel j (c.next j)
· simp only [comp_f, homotopyCofiber_d, zero_f, add_zero,
inlX_d φ i j _ hij hj, dNext_eq _ hj, dif_pos hj,
add_neg_cancel_left, inr_f]
· rw [dNext_eq_zero _ _ hj, zero_add, zero_f, add_zero, homotopyCofiber_d,
inlX_d' _ _ _ _ hj, comp_f, inr_f]
variable (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j)
lemma inrCompHomotopy_hom (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) :
(inrCompHomotopy φ hc).hom i j = inlX φ i j hij := dif_pos hij
lemma inrCompHomotopy_hom_eq_zero (i j : ι) (hij : ¬ c.Rel j i) :
(inrCompHomotopy φ hc).hom i j = 0 := dif_neg hij
end
section
variable (α : G ⟶ K) (hα : Homotopy (φ ≫ α) 0)
/-- The morphism `homotopyCofiber φ ⟶ K` that is induced by a morphism `α : G ⟶ K`
and a homotopy `hα : Homotopy (φ ≫ α) 0`. -/
noncomputable def desc :
homotopyCofiber φ ⟶ K where
f j :=
if hj : c.Rel j (c.next j)
then fstX φ j _ hj ≫ hα.hom _ j + sndX φ j ≫ α.f j
else sndX φ j ≫ α.f j
comm' j k hjk := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hjk
dsimp
simp [dif_pos hjk]
have H := hα.comm (c.next j)
simp only [comp_f, zero_f, add_zero, prevD_eq _ hjk] at H
split_ifs with hj
· simp only [comp_add, d_sndX_assoc _ _ _ hjk, add_comp, assoc, H,
d_fstX_assoc _ _ _ _ hjk, neg_comp, dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
abel
· simp only [d_sndX_assoc _ _ _ hjk, add_comp, assoc, add_left_inj, H,
dNext_eq_zero _ _ hj, zero_add]
lemma desc_f (j k : ι) (hjk : c.Rel j k) :
(desc φ α hα).f j = fstX φ j _ hjk ≫ hα.hom _ j + sndX φ j ≫ α.f j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hjk
apply dif_pos hjk
lemma desc_f' (j : ι) (hj : ¬ c.Rel j (c.next j)) :
(desc φ α hα).f j = sndX φ j ≫ α.f j := by
apply dif_neg hj
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inlX_desc_f (i j : ι) (hjk : c.Rel j i) :
inlX φ i j hjk ≫ (desc φ α hα).f j = hα.hom i j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hjk
dsimp [desc]
rw [dif_pos hjk, comp_add, inlX_fstX_assoc, inlX_sndX_assoc, zero_comp, add_zero]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inrX_desc_f (i : ι) :
inrX φ i ≫ (desc φ α hα).f i = α.f i := by
dsimp [desc]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_desc :
inr φ ≫ desc φ α hα = α := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inrCompHomotopy_hom_desc_hom (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j) (i j : ι) :
(inrCompHomotopy φ hc).hom i j ≫ (desc φ α hα).f j = hα.hom i j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel j i
· dsimp
simp only [inrCompHomotopy_hom φ hc i j hij, desc_f φ α hα _ _ hij,
comp_add, inlX_fstX_assoc, inlX_sndX_assoc, zero_comp, add_zero]
· simp only [Homotopy.zero _ _ _ hij, zero_comp]
lemma eq_desc (f : homotopyCofiber φ ⟶ K) (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j) :
f = desc φ (inr φ ≫ f) (Homotopy.trans (Homotopy.ofEq (by simp))
(((inrCompHomotopy φ hc).compRight f).trans (Homotopy.ofEq (by simp)))) := by
ext j
by_cases hj : c.Rel j (c.next j)
· apply ext_from_X φ _ _ hj
· simp [inrCompHomotopy_hom _ _ _ _ hj]
· simp
· apply ext_from_X' φ _ hj
simp
end
lemma descSigma_ext_iff {φ : F ⟶ G} {K : HomologicalComplex C c}
(x y : Σ (α : G ⟶ K), Homotopy (φ ≫ α) 0) :
x = y ↔ x.1 = y.1 ∧ (∀ (i j : ι) (_ : c.Rel j i), x.2.hom i j = y.2.hom i j) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· obtain ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ := y
rintro ⟨rfl, h⟩
simp only [Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij : c.Rel j i
· exact h _ _ hij
· simp only [Homotopy.zero _ _ _ hij]
/-- Morphisms `homotopyCofiber φ ⟶ K` are uniquely determined by
a morphism `α : G ⟶ K` and a homotopy from `φ ≫ α` to `0`. -/
noncomputable def descEquiv (K : HomologicalComplex C c) (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j) :
(Σ (α : G ⟶ K), Homotopy (φ ≫ α) 0) ≃ (homotopyCofiber φ ⟶ K) where
toFun := fun ⟨α, hα⟩ => desc φ α hα
invFun f := ⟨inr φ ≫ f, Homotopy.trans (Homotopy.ofEq (by simp))
(((inrCompHomotopy φ hc).compRight f).trans (Homotopy.ofEq (by simp)))⟩
right_inv f := (eq_desc φ f hc).symm
left_inv := fun ⟨α, hα⟩ => by
rw [descSigma_ext_iff]
aesop_cat
end homotopyCofiber
section
variable (K)
variable [∀ i, HasBinaryBiproduct (K.X i) (K.X i)]
[HasHomotopyCofiber (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K))]
/-- The cylinder object of a homological complex `K` is the homotopy cofiber
of the morphism `biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K) : K ⟶ K ⊞ K`. -/
noncomputable abbrev cylinder := homotopyCofiber (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K))
namespace cylinder
/-- The left inclusion `K ⟶ K.cylinder`. -/
noncomputable def ι₀ : K ⟶ K.cylinder := biprod.inl ≫ homotopyCofiber.inr _
/-- The right inclusion `K ⟶ K.cylinder`. -/
noncomputable def ι₁ : K ⟶ K.cylinder := biprod.inr ≫ homotopyCofiber.inr _
variable {K}
section
variable (φ₀ φ₁ : K ⟶ F) (h : Homotopy φ₀ φ₁)
/-- The morphism `K.cylinder ⟶ F` that is induced by two morphisms `φ₀ φ₁ : K ⟶ F`
and a homotopy `h : Homotopy φ₀ φ₁`. -/
noncomputable def desc : K.cylinder ⟶ F :=
homotopyCofiber.desc _ (biprod.desc φ₀ φ₁)
(Homotopy.trans (Homotopy.ofEq (by
simp only [biprod.lift_desc, id_comp, neg_comp, sub_eq_add_neg]))
((Homotopy.equivSubZero h)))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι₀_desc : ι₀ K ≫ desc φ₀ φ₁ h = φ₀ := by simp [ι₀, desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι₁_desc : ι₁ K ≫ desc φ₀ φ₁ h = φ₁ := by simp [ι₁, desc]
end
variable (K)
/-- The projection `π : K.cylinder ⟶ K`. -/
noncomputable def π : K.cylinder ⟶ K := desc (𝟙 K) (𝟙 K) (Homotopy.refl _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι₀_π : ι₀ K ≫ π K = 𝟙 K := by simp [π]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι₁_π : ι₁ K ≫ π K = 𝟙 K := by simp [π]
/-- The left inclusion `K.X i ⟶ K.cylinder.X j` when `c.Rel j i`. -/
noncomputable abbrev inlX (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) : K.X i ⟶ K.cylinder.X j :=
homotopyCofiber.inlX (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K)) i j hij
/-- The right inclusion `(K ⊞ K).X i ⟶ K.cylinder.X i`. -/
noncomputable abbrev inrX (i : ι) : (K ⊞ K).X i ⟶ K.cylinder.X i :=
homotopyCofiber.inrX (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K)) i
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inlX_π (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) :
inlX K i j hij ≫ (π K).f j = 0 := by
erw [homotopyCofiber.inlX_desc_f]
simp [Homotopy.equivSubZero]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inrX_π (i : ι) :
inrX K i ≫ (π K).f i = (biprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 K)).f i :=
homotopyCofiber.inrX_desc_f _ _ _ _
section
variable (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j)
namespace πCompι₀Homotopy
/-- A null homotopic map `K.cylinder ⟶ K.cylinder` which identifies to
`π K ≫ ι₀ K - 𝟙 _`, see `nullHomotopicMap_eq`. -/
noncomputable def nullHomotopicMap : K.cylinder ⟶ K.cylinder :=
Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'
(fun i j hij => homotopyCofiber.sndX (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K)) i ≫
(biprod.snd : K ⊞ K ⟶ K).f i ≫ inlX K i j hij)
/-- The obvious homotopy from `nullHomotopicMap K` to zero. -/
noncomputable def nullHomotopy : Homotopy (nullHomotopicMap K) 0 :=
Homotopy.nullHomotopy' _
lemma inlX_nullHomotopy_f (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel j i) :
inlX K i j hij ≫ (nullHomotopicMap K).f j =
inlX K i j hij ≫ (π K ≫ ι₀ K - 𝟙 _).f j := by
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap]
by_cases hj : ∃ (k : ι), c.Rel k j
· obtain ⟨k, hjk⟩ := hj
simp only [assoc, Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f hjk hij, homotopyCofiber_X, homotopyCofiber_d,
homotopyCofiber.d_sndX_assoc _ _ _ hij, add_comp, comp_add, homotopyCofiber.inlX_fstX_assoc,
homotopyCofiber.inlX_sndX_assoc, zero_comp, add_zero, comp_sub, inlX_π_assoc, comp_id,
zero_sub, ← HomologicalComplex.comp_f_assoc, biprod.lift_snd, neg_f_apply, id_f,
neg_comp, id_comp]
· simp only [not_exists] at hj
simp only [Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_right hij hj,
homotopyCofiber_X, homotopyCofiber_d, assoc, comp_sub, comp_id,
homotopyCofiber.d_sndX_assoc _ _ _ hij, add_comp, comp_add, zero_comp, add_zero,
homotopyCofiber.inlX_fstX_assoc, homotopyCofiber.inlX_sndX_assoc,
← HomologicalComplex.comp_f_assoc, biprod.lift_snd, neg_f_apply, id_f, neg_comp,
id_comp, inlX_π_assoc, zero_sub]
include hc
lemma inrX_nullHomotopy_f (j : ι) :
inrX K j ≫ (nullHomotopicMap K).f j = inrX K j ≫ (π K ≫ ι₀ K - 𝟙 _).f j := by
have : biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K) = biprod.inl - biprod.inr :=
biprod.hom_ext _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
obtain ⟨i, hij⟩ := hc j
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap]
by_cases hj : ∃ (k : ι), c.Rel j k
· obtain ⟨k, hjk⟩ := hj
simp only [Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f hij hjk,
homotopyCofiber_X, homotopyCofiber_d, assoc, comp_add,
homotopyCofiber.inrX_d_assoc, homotopyCofiber.inrX_sndX_assoc, comp_sub,
inrX_π_assoc, comp_id, ← Hom.comm_assoc, homotopyCofiber.inlX_d _ _ _ _ _ hjk,
comp_neg, add_neg_cancel_left]
rw [← cancel_epi (biprodXIso K K j).inv]
ext
· simp [ι₀]
· dsimp
simp only [inr_biprodXIso_inv_assoc, biprod_inr_snd_f_assoc, comp_sub,
biprod_inr_desc_f_assoc, id_f, id_comp, ι₀, comp_f, this,
sub_f_apply, sub_comp, homotopyCofiber_X, homotopyCofiber.inr_f]
· simp only [not_exists] at hj
simp only [assoc, Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left hij hj, homotopyCofiber_X,
homotopyCofiber_d, homotopyCofiber.inlX_d' _ _ _ _ (hj _), homotopyCofiber.inrX_sndX_assoc,
comp_sub, inrX_π_assoc, comp_id, ι₀, comp_f, homotopyCofiber.inr_f]
rw [← cancel_epi (biprodXIso K K j).inv]
ext
· simp
· simp [this]
lemma nullHomotopicMap_eq : nullHomotopicMap K = π K ≫ ι₀ K - 𝟙 _ := by
ext i
by_cases hi : c.Rel i (c.next i)
· exact homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K)) (c.next i) i hi
(inlX_nullHomotopy_f _ _ _ _) (inrX_nullHomotopy_f _ hc _)
· exact homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X' (biprod.lift (𝟙 K) (-𝟙 K)) _ hi (inrX_nullHomotopy_f _ hc _)
end πCompι₀Homotopy
/-- The homotopy between `π K ≫ ι₀ K` and `𝟙 K.cylinder`. -/
noncomputable def πCompι₀Homotopy : Homotopy (π K ≫ ι₀ K) (𝟙 K.cylinder) :=
Homotopy.equivSubZero.symm
((Homotopy.ofEq (πCompι₀Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap_eq K hc).symm).trans
(πCompι₀Homotopy.nullHomotopy K))
/-- The homotopy equivalence between `K.cylinder` and `K`. -/
noncomputable def homotopyEquiv : HomotopyEquiv K.cylinder K where
hom := π K
inv := ι₀ K
homotopyHomInvId := πCompι₀Homotopy K hc
homotopyInvHomId := Homotopy.ofEq (by simp)
/-- The homotopy between `cylinder.ι₀ K` and `cylinder.ι₁ K`. -/
noncomputable def homotopy₀₁ : Homotopy (ι₀ K) (ι₁ K) :=
(Homotopy.ofEq (by simp)).trans (((πCompι₀Homotopy K hc).compLeft (ι₁ K)).trans
(Homotopy.ofEq (by simp)))
|
include hc in
lemma map_ι₀_eq_map_ι₁ {D : Type*} [Category D] (H : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ D)
(hH : (homotopyEquivalences C c).IsInvertedBy H) :
H.map (ι₀ K) = H.map (ι₁ K) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCofiber.lean | 534 | 538 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
| theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 198 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r ⟨typein r a, typein_lt_type r a⟩ = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
(enum _).map_rel_iff
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
¬r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₂ ≤ o₁ := by
rw [enum_lt_enum (r := r), not_lt]
-- TODO: generalize to other well-orders
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type (· < ·))} :
enum (· < ·) o₁ ≤ enum (α := a.toType) (· < ·) o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ := by
rw [← enum_le_enum, not_lt]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
enum r o₁ = enum r o₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq _
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r ⟨0, h0⟩) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.toType) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, type_toType _ ▸ h0⟩ ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hs⟩ := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (g.transRelIso f)]; rfl
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hr.trans_eq (Quotient.sound ⟨f⟩)⟩ :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.toType`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp]
noncomputable def enumIsoToType (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.toType where
toFun x := enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨x.1, type_toType _ ▸ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv _ := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := enum_le_enum' _
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio o) :=
⟨_, ⟨(enumIsoToType _).toEquiv⟩⟩
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_union_right]
infer_instance
instance small_Ico (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `o ≠ 0`. -/
def toTypeOrderBot {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' (by rwa [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero])
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
@[deprecated "use toTypeOrderBot" (since := "2025-02-13")]
def toTypeOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, by rwa [type_toType]⟩ =
have H := toTypeOrderBot (o := o) (by rintro rfl; simp at ho)
(⊥ : o.toType) :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, _, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (enum _) wo.wf)
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : typein s (f a) = typein r a := by
rw [← f.transPrincipal_apply _ a, (f.transPrincipal _).eq]
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `liftInitialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) : lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't seem to work. -/
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't work. -/
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg)
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) := by
refine Quotient.eq'.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a = lift.{u, v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a < lift.{u, v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_typein_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : lift.{u} (typein s f.top) = lift (type r) :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def liftInitialSeg : Ordinal.{v} ≤i Ordinal.{max u v} := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone lift.{u} (by simp),
fun a b ↦ Ordinal.inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_id'.{max u v} (type s),
← lift_umax.{v, u}, lift_type_lt] at h
obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
use typein r f.top
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_umax, lift_typein_top, lift_id']
@[simp]
theorem liftInitialSeg_coe : (liftInitialSeg.{v, u} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v, u} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
(liftInitialSeg.trans liftInitialSeg).eq liftInitialSeg a
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (card a) = card (lift.{u} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem mem_range_lift_of_le {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v} a) :
b ∈ Set.range lift.{v} :=
liftInitialSeg.mem_range_of_le h
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' ≤ a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.le_apply_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' < a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.lt_apply_iff
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal ω -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega0 : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift (typeLT ℕ)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega0
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega0]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : typeLT ℕ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem card_omega0 : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega0 : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
| -/
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 760 | 761 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Data.Option.NAry
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Basic
/-!
# `WithBot`, `WithTop`
Adding a `bot` or a `top` to an order.
## Main declarations
* `With<Top/Bot> α`: Equips `Option α` with the order on `α` plus `none` as the top/bottom element.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
namespace WithBot
variable {a b : α}
instance nontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (WithBot α) :=
Option.nontrivial
open Function
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : α → WithBot α) :=
Option.some_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (a : WithBot α) = b ↔ a = b :=
Option.some_inj
protected theorem «forall» {p : WithBot α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p ⊥ ∧ ∀ x : α, p x :=
Option.forall
protected theorem «exists» {p : WithBot α → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ p ⊥ ∨ ∃ x : α, p x :=
Option.exists
theorem none_eq_bot : (none : WithBot α) = (⊥ : WithBot α) :=
rfl
theorem some_eq_coe (a : α) : (Option.some a : WithBot α) = (↑a : WithBot α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_coe : ⊥ ≠ (a : WithBot α) :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_bot : (a : WithBot α) ≠ ⊥ :=
nofun
/-- Specialization of `Option.getD` to values in `WithBot α` that respects API boundaries.
-/
def unbotD (d : α) (x : WithBot α) : α :=
recBotCoe d id x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot' := unbotD
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_bot {α} (d : α) : unbotD d ⊥ = d :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_bot := unbotD_bot
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_coe {α} (d x : α) : unbotD d x = x :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_coe := unbotD_coe
theorem coe_eq_coe : (a : WithBot α) = b ↔ a = b := coe_inj
theorem unbotD_eq_iff {d y : α} {x : WithBot α} : unbotD d x = y ↔ x = y ∨ x = ⊥ ∧ y = d := by
induction x <;> simp [@eq_comm _ d]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_iff := unbotD_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_eq_self_iff {d : α} {x : WithBot α} : unbotD d x = d ↔ x = d ∨ x = ⊥ := by
simp [unbotD_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_self_iff := unbotD_eq_self_iff
theorem unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff {d : α} {x y : WithBot α} :
unbotD d x = unbotD d y ↔ x = y ∨ x = d ∧ y = ⊥ ∨ x = ⊥ ∧ y = d := by
induction y <;> simp [unbotD_eq_iff, or_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_unbot'_iff := unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff
/-- Lift a map `f : α → β` to `WithBot α → WithBot β`. Implemented using `Option.map`. -/
def map (f : α → β) : WithBot α → WithBot β :=
Option.map f
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : α → β) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_eq_bot_iff {f : α → β} {a : WithBot α} :
map f a = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := Option.map_eq_none_iff
theorem map_eq_some_iff {f : α → β} {y : β} {v : WithBot α} :
WithBot.map f v = .some y ↔ ∃ x, v = .some x ∧ f x = y := Option.map_eq_some_iff
theorem some_eq_map_iff {f : α → β} {y : β} {v : WithBot α} :
.some y = WithBot.map f v ↔ ∃ x, v = .some x ∧ f x = y := by
cases v <;> simp [eq_comm]
theorem map_comm {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {g₁ : β → δ} {g₂ : γ → δ}
(h : g₁ ∘ f₁ = g₂ ∘ f₂) (a : α) :
map g₁ (map f₁ a) = map g₂ (map f₂ a) :=
Option.map_comm h _
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function
`WithBot α → WithBot β → WithBot γ`.
| Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ : (α → β → γ) → WithBot α → WithBot β → WithBot γ := Option.map₂
| Mathlib/Order/WithBot.lean | 139 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.RightAngle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Circumcenter
/-!
# Angles in circles and sphere.
This file proves results about angles in circles and spheres.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented vector angle
form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y z : V} (hxyne : x ≠ y) (hxzne : x ≠ z)
(hxy : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (hxz : ‖x‖ = ‖z‖) : o.oangle y z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) := by
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxyne hxy
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (hxy.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
have hz : z ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (hxz ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)
calc
o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y := (o.oangle_sub_left hx hy hz).symm
_ = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - z) x - (π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - y) x) := by
rw [o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxzne.symm hxz.symm,
o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxyne.symm hxy.symm]
_ = (2 : ℤ) • (o.oangle (x - y) x - o.oangle (x - z) x) := by abel
_ = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - y) (x - z) := by
rw [o.oangle_sub_right (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxyne) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxzne) hx]
_ = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) := by rw [← oangle_neg_neg, neg_sub, neg_sub]
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented vector angle
form with radius specified. -/
theorem oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real {x y z : V} (hxyne : x ≠ y) (hxzne : x ≠ z)
{r : ℝ} (hx : ‖x‖ = r) (hy : ‖y‖ = r) (hz : ‖z‖ = r) :
o.oangle y z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) :=
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxyne hxzne (hy.symm ▸ hx) (hz.symm ▸ hx)
/-- Oriented vector angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of
a cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same
result), represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_sub_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x₁ x₂ y z : V} (hx₁yne : x₁ ≠ y)
(hx₁zne : x₁ ≠ z) (hx₂yne : x₂ ≠ y) (hx₂zne : x₂ ≠ z) {r : ℝ} (hx₁ : ‖x₁‖ = r) (hx₂ : ‖x₂‖ = r)
(hy : ‖y‖ = r) (hz : ‖z‖ = r) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x₁) (z - x₁) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x₂) (z - x₂) :=
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real hx₁yne hx₁zne hx₁ hy hz ▸
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real hx₂yne hx₂zne hx₂ hy hz
end Orientation
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
local notation "o" => Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
namespace Sphere
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented angle version. -/
theorem oangle_center_eq_two_zsmul_oangle {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∡ p₁ s.center p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [mem_sphere, @dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at hp₁ hp₂ hp₃
rw [oangle, oangle, o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real _ _ hp₂ hp₁ hp₃] <;>
| simp [hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃]
/-- Oriented angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a
cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same result),
represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_eq {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Sphere.lean | 82 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Log
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `Real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and its relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log x / log b
theorem log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
@[simp]
theorem logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
theorem logb_zero_left : logb 0 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_zero, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_zero_left_eq_zero : logb 0 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_zero_left, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem logb_one_left : logb 1 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_one, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_one_left_eq_zero : logb 1 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_one_left, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
lemma logb_self_eq_one (hb : 1 < b) : logb b b = 1 :=
div_self (log_pos hb).ne'
lemma logb_self_eq_one_iff : logb b b = 1 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ -1 :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h h' => by simp [logb, h'] at h, div_self⟩ log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b |x| = logb b x := by rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
@[simp]
theorem logb_neg_eq_logb (x : ℝ) : logb b (-x) = logb b x := by
rw [← logb_abs x, ← logb_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem logb_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x * y) = logb b x + logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_mul hx hy, add_div]
theorem logb_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x / y) = logb b x - logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_div hx hy, sub_div]
@[simp]
theorem logb_inv (x : ℝ) : logb b x⁻¹ = -logb b x := by simp [logb, neg_div]
theorem inv_logb (a b : ℝ) : (logb a b)⁻¹ = logb b a := by simp_rw [logb, inv_div]
theorem inv_logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a * b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_mul h₁ h₂
theorem inv_logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a / b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_div h₁ h₂
theorem logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a * b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_mul_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
theorem logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a / b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_logb_div_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv]
theorem mul_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : b ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 1) (h₃ : b ≠ -1) :
logb a b * logb b c = logb a c := by
unfold logb
rw [mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel₀ (log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)]
theorem div_logb {a b c : ℝ} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ 1) (h₃ : c ≠ -1) :
logb a c / logb b c = logb a b :=
div_div_div_cancel_left' _ _ <| log_ne_zero.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem logb_rpow_eq_mul_logb_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : logb b (x ^ y) = y * logb b x := by
rw [logb, log_rpow hx, logb, mul_div_assoc]
theorem logb_pow (b x : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : logb b (x ^ k) = k * logb b x := by
rw [logb, logb, log_pow, mul_div_assoc]
section BPosAndNeOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_ne_one : b ≠ 1)
include b_pos b_ne_one
private theorem log_b_ne_zero : log b ≠ 0 := by
have b_ne_zero : b ≠ 0 := by linarith
have b_ne_minus_one : b ≠ -1 := by linarith
simp [b_ne_one, b_ne_zero, b_ne_minus_one]
@[simp]
theorem logb_rpow : logb b (b ^ x) = x := by
rw [logb, div_eq_iff, log_rpow b_pos]
exact log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one
theorem rpow_logb_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ logb b x = |x| := by
apply log_injOn_pos
· simp only [Set.mem_Ioi]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· simp only [abs_pos, mem_Ioi, Ne, hx, not_false_iff]
rw [log_rpow b_pos, logb, log_abs]
field_simp [log_b_ne_zero b_pos b_ne_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_logb (hx : 0 < x) : b ^ logb b x = x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem rpow_logb_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : b ^ logb b x = -x := by
rw [rpow_logb_eq_abs b_pos b_ne_one (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem logb_eq_iff_rpow_eq (hy : 0 < y) : logb b y = x ↔ b ^ x = y := by
constructor <;> rintro rfl
· exact rpow_logb b_pos b_ne_one hy
· exact logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one
theorem surjOn_logb : SurjOn (logb b) (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨b ^ x, rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
theorem logb_surjective : Surjective (logb b) := fun x => ⟨b ^ x, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_logb : range (logb b) = univ :=
(logb_surjective b_pos b_ne_one).range_eq
theorem surjOn_logb' : SurjOn (logb b) (Iio 0) univ := by
intro x _
use -b ^ x
constructor
· simp only [Right.neg_neg_iff, Set.mem_Iio]
apply rpow_pos_of_pos b_pos
· rw [logb_neg_eq_logb, logb_rpow b_pos b_ne_one]
end BPosAndNeOne
section OneLtB
variable (hb : 1 < b)
include hb
private theorem b_pos : 0 < b := by linarith
-- Name has a prime added to avoid clashing with `b_ne_one` further down the file
private theorem b_ne_one' : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb), log_le_log_iff h h₁]
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_le (h : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y :=
(logb_le_logb hb h (by linarith)).mpr hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem logb_lt_logb (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b x < logb b y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : logb b x < logb b y ↔ x < y := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (log_pos hb)]
exact log_lt_log_iff hx hy
theorem logb_le_iff_le_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ b ^ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hx]
theorem logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ x < b ^ y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hx]
theorem le_logb_iff_rpow_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ b ^ x ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hy]
theorem lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ b ^ x < y := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff hb, rpow_logb (b_pos hb) (b_ne_one' hb) hy]
theorem logb_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← @logb_one b]
rw [logb_lt_logb_iff hb zero_lt_one hx]
theorem logb_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < logb b x := by
rw [logb_pos_iff hb (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
exact hx
theorem logb_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← logb_one]
exact logb_lt_logb_iff hb h zero_lt_one
theorem logb_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff hb h0).2 h1
theorem logb_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff hb hx, not_lt]
theorem logb_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ logb b x :=
(logb_nonneg_iff hb (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem logb_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff hb hx, not_lt]
theorem logb_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
exact logb_nonpos_iff hb hx
theorem logb_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : logb b x ≤ 0 :=
(logb_nonpos_iff' hb hx).2 h'x
theorem strictMonoOn_logb : StrictMonoOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy =>
logb_lt_logb hb hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_logb : StrictAntiOn (logb b) (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x]
refine logb_lt_logb hb (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem logb_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
(strictMonoOn_logb hb).injOn
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) : x = 1 :=
logb_injOn_pos hb (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.logb_one.symm)
theorem logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero hb hx_pos) hx
theorem tendsto_logb_atTop : Tendsto (logb b) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.atTop_div_const (log_pos hb) tendsto_log_atTop
end OneLtB
section BPosAndBLtOne
variable (b_pos : 0 < b) (b_lt_one : b < 1)
include b_lt_one
private theorem b_ne_one : b ≠ 1 := by linarith
include b_pos
@[simp]
theorem logb_le_logb_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : logb b x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_le_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one), log_le_log_iff h₁ h]
theorem logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) : logb b y < logb b x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)]
exact log_lt_log hx hxy
@[simp]
theorem logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) :
logb b x < logb b y ↔ y < x := by
rw [logb, logb, div_lt_div_right_of_neg (log_neg b_pos b_lt_one)]
exact log_lt_log_iff hy hx
theorem logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ y ↔ b ^ y ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
theorem logb_lt_iff_lt_rpow_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x < y ↔ b ^ y < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hx]
theorem le_logb_iff_rpow_le_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ logb b y ↔ y ≤ b ^ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
theorem lt_logb_iff_rpow_lt_of_base_lt_one (hy : 0 < y) : x < logb b y ↔ y < b ^ x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one, rpow_logb b_pos (b_ne_one b_lt_one) hy]
theorem logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < logb b x ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one zero_lt_one hx]
theorem logb_pos_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x < 1) : 0 < logb b x := by
rw [logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx]
exact hx'
theorem logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one (h : 0 < x) : logb b x < 0 ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← @logb_one b, logb_lt_logb_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one h zero_lt_one]
theorem logb_neg_of_base_lt_one (h1 : 1 < x) : logb b x < 0 :=
(logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (lt_trans zero_lt_one h1)).2 h1
theorem logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ logb b x ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_neg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
theorem logb_nonneg_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) (hx' : x ≤ 1) : 0 ≤ logb b x := by
rw [logb_nonneg_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx]
exact hx'
theorem logb_nonpos_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx : 0 < x) : logb b x ≤ 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← not_lt, logb_pos_iff_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx, not_lt]
theorem strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one : StrictAntiOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy =>
logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx hxy
theorem strictMonoOn_logb_of_base_lt_one : StrictMonoOn (logb b) (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← logb_abs y, ← logb_abs x]
refine logb_lt_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one : Set.InjOn (logb b) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
(strictAntiOn_logb_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one).injOn
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : logb b x = 0) : x = 1 :=
logb_injOn_pos_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one)
(h₂.trans Real.logb_one.symm)
theorem logb_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one_of_base_lt_one (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : logb b x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_logb_eq_zero_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one hx_pos) hx
theorem tendsto_logb_atTop_of_base_lt_one : Tendsto (logb b) atTop atBot := by
rw [tendsto_atTop_atBot]
intro e
use 1 ⊔ b ^ e
intro a
simp only [and_imp, sup_le_iff]
intro ha
rw [logb_le_iff_le_rpow_of_base_lt_one b_pos b_lt_one]
· tauto
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ha
end BPosAndBLtOne
@[norm_cast]
theorem floor_logb_natCast {b : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
⌊logb b r⌋ = Int.log b r := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [logb_zero, Int.log_zero_right, Int.floor_zero]
by_cases hb : 1 < b
· have hb1' : 1 < (b : ℝ) := Nat.one_lt_cast.mpr hb
| apply le_antisymm
· rw [← Int.zpow_le_iff_le_log hb hr, ← rpow_intCast b]
refine le_of_le_of_eq ?_ (rpow_logb (zero_lt_one.trans hb1') hb1'.ne' hr)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Base.lean | 361 | 363 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
theorem setToL1_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f := by
induction f using Lp.induction (hp_ne_top := one_ne_top) with
| @indicatorConst c s hs hμs =>
rw [setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs, setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT' hs hμs]
exact hTT' s hs hμs c
| @add f g hf hg _ hf_le hg_le =>
rw [(setToL1 hT).map_add, (setToL1 hT').map_add]
exact add_le_add hf_le hg_le
| isClosed => exact isClosed_le (setToL1 hT).continuous (setToL1 hT').continuous
theorem setToL1_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f :=
setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToL1_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁[μ] G'}
| (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f := by
suffices ∀ f : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g }, 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f from
this (⟨f, hf⟩ : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g })
refine fun g =>
@isClosed_property { g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } _ _
(fun g => 0 ≤ setToL1 hT g)
(denseRange_coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' one_ne_top) ?_ ?_ g
· exact isClosed_le continuous_zero ((setToL1 hT).continuous.comp continuous_induced_dom)
· intro g
have : (coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' g : α →₁[μ] G') = (g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G') := rfl
rw [this, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_nonneg (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg g.2
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 539 | 550 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.