Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Ashwin Iyengar. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Johan Commelin, Ashwin Iyengar, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.OpenSubgroup
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
/-!
# Nonarchimedean Topology
In this file we set up the theory of nonarchimedean topological groups and rings.
A nonarchimedean group is a topological group whose topology admits a basis of
open neighborhoods of the identity element in the group consisting of open subgroups.
A nonarchimedean ring is a topological ring whose underlying topological (additive)
group is nonarchimedean.
## Definitions
- `NonarchimedeanAddGroup`: nonarchimedean additive group.
- `NonarchimedeanGroup`: nonarchimedean multiplicative group.
- `NonarchimedeanRing`: nonarchimedean ring.
-/
open Topology
open scoped Pointwise
/-- A topological additive group is nonarchimedean if every neighborhood of 0
contains an open subgroup. -/
class NonarchimedeanAddGroup (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] : Prop
extends IsTopologicalAddGroup G where
is_nonarchimedean : ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), ∃ V : OpenAddSubgroup G, (V : Set G) ⊆ U
/-- A topological group is nonarchimedean if every neighborhood of 1 contains an open subgroup. -/
@[to_additive]
class NonarchimedeanGroup (G : Type*) [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] : Prop
extends IsTopologicalGroup G where
is_nonarchimedean : ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), ∃ V : OpenSubgroup G, (V : Set G) ⊆ U
/-- A topological ring is nonarchimedean if its underlying topological additive
group is nonarchimedean. -/
class NonarchimedeanRing (R : Type*) [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] : Prop
extends IsTopologicalRing R where
is_nonarchimedean : ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : R), ∃ V : OpenAddSubgroup R, (V : Set R) ⊆ U
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Every nonarchimedean ring is naturally a nonarchimedean additive group. -/
instance (priority := 100) NonarchimedeanRing.to_nonarchimedeanAddGroup (R : Type*) [Ring R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [t : NonarchimedeanRing R] : NonarchimedeanAddGroup R :=
{ t with }
namespace NonarchimedeanGroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [NonarchimedeanGroup G]
variable {H : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H]
variable {K : Type*} [Group K] [TopologicalSpace K] [NonarchimedeanGroup K]
/-- If a topological group embeds into a nonarchimedean group, then it is nonarchimedean. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem nonarchimedean_of_emb (f : G →* H) (emb : IsOpenEmbedding f) : NonarchimedeanGroup H :=
{ is_nonarchimedean := fun U hU =>
have h₁ : f ⁻¹' U ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := by
apply emb.continuous.tendsto
rwa [f.map_one]
let ⟨V, hV⟩ := is_nonarchimedean (f ⁻¹' U) h₁
⟨{ Subgroup.map f V with isOpen' := emb.isOpenMap _ V.isOpen }, Set.image_subset_iff.2 hV⟩ }
/-- An open neighborhood of the identity in the cartesian product of two nonarchimedean groups
contains the cartesian product of an open neighborhood in each group. -/
@[to_additive NonarchimedeanAddGroup.prod_subset "An open neighborhood of the identity in
the cartesian product of two nonarchimedean groups contains the cartesian product of
an open neighborhood in each group."]
theorem prod_subset {U} (hU : U ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G × K)) :
∃ (V : OpenSubgroup G) (W : OpenSubgroup K), (V : Set G) ×ˢ (W : Set K) ⊆ U := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.mem_prod_iff] at hU
rcases hU with ⟨U₁, hU₁, U₂, hU₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨V, hV⟩ := is_nonarchimedean _ hU₁
obtain ⟨W, hW⟩ := is_nonarchimedean _ hU₂
use V; use W
rw [Set.prod_subset_iff]
| intro x hX y hY
exact Set.Subset.trans (Set.prod_mono hV hW) h (Set.mem_sep hX hY)
/-- An open neighborhood of the identity in the cartesian square of a nonarchimedean group
contains the cartesian square of an open neighborhood in the group. -/
@[to_additive NonarchimedeanAddGroup.prod_self_subset "An open neighborhood of the identity in
the cartesian square of a nonarchimedean group contains the cartesian square of
an open neighborhood in the group."]
theorem prod_self_subset {U} (hU : U ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G × G)) :
∃ V : OpenSubgroup G, (V : Set G) ×ˢ (V : Set G) ⊆ U :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Nonarchimedean/Basic.lean | 84 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Transfer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Schreier's Lemma
In this file we prove Schreier's lemma.
## Main results
- `closure_mul_image_eq` : **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Set G` is a right_transversal
of `H : Subgroup G` with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Set G`,
then `H` is generated by the `Set` `(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`.
- `fg_of_index_ne_zero` : **Schreier's Lemma**: A finite index subgroup of a finitely generated
group is finitely generated.
- `card_commutator_le_of_finite_commutatorSet`: A theorem of Schur: The size of the commutator
subgroup is bounded in terms of the number of commutators.
-/
open scoped Finset Pointwise
section CommGroup
open Subgroup
variable (G : Type*) [CommGroup G] [Group.FG G]
@[to_additive]
theorem card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank : Nat.card G ∣ Monoid.exponent G ^ Group.rank G := by
classical
obtain ⟨S, hS1, hS2⟩ := Group.rank_spec G
rw [← hS1, ← Fintype.card_coe, ← Finset.card_univ, ← Finset.prod_const]
let f : (∀ g : S, zpowers (g : G)) →* G := noncommPiCoprod fun s t _ x y _ _ => mul_comm x _
have hf : Function.Surjective f := by
rw [← MonoidHom.range_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← hS2, closure_le]
exact fun g hg => ⟨Pi.mulSingle ⟨g, hg⟩ ⟨g, mem_zpowers g⟩, noncommPiCoprod_mulSingle _ _⟩
replace hf := card_dvd_of_surjective f hf
rw [Nat.card_pi] at hf
refine hf.trans (Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd _ _ fun g _ => ?_)
rw [Nat.card_zpowers]
exact Monoid.order_dvd_exponent (g : G)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank' {n : ℕ} (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
Nat.card G ∣ n ^ Group.rank G :=
(card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank G).trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (Monoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one hG) (Group.rank G))
end CommGroup
namespace Subgroup
open MemRightTransversals
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {H : Subgroup G} {R S : Set G}
theorem closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top
(hR : IsComplement H R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R) (hS : closure S = ⊤) :
(closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹)) * R = ⊤ := by
let f : G → R := hR.toRightFun
let U : Set G := (R * S).image fun g => g * (f g : G)⁻¹
change (closure U : Set G) * R = ⊤
refine top_le_iff.mp fun g _ => ?_
refine closure_induction_right ?_ ?_ ?_ (eq_top_iff.mp hS (mem_top g))
· exact ⟨1, (closure U).one_mem, 1, hR1, one_mul 1⟩
· rintro - - s hs ⟨u, hu, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [show u * r * s = u * (r * s * (f (r * s) : G)⁻¹) * f (r * s) by group]
refine Set.mul_mem_mul ((closure U).mul_mem hu ?_) (f (r * s)).coe_prop
exact subset_closure ⟨r * s, Set.mul_mem_mul hr hs, rfl⟩
· rintro - - s hs ⟨u, hu, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [show u * r * s⁻¹ = u * (f (r * s⁻¹) * s * r⁻¹)⁻¹ * f (r * s⁻¹) by group]
refine Set.mul_mem_mul ((closure U).mul_mem hu ((closure U).inv_mem ?_)) (f (r * s⁻¹)).2
refine subset_closure ⟨f (r * s⁻¹) * s, Set.mul_mem_mul (f (r * s⁻¹)).2 hs, ?_⟩
rw [mul_right_inj, inv_inj, ← Subtype.coe_mk r hr, ← Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply (isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.mp hR (f (r * s⁻¹) * s)).unique
(hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem (f (r * s⁻¹) * s))
rw [mul_assoc, ← inv_inv s, ← mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
exact hR.toRightFun_mul_inv_mem (r * s⁻¹)
/-- **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Set G` is a `rightTransversal` of `H : Subgroup G`
with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Set G`, then `H` is generated by the `Set`
`(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`. -/
theorem closure_mul_image_eq (hR : IsComplement H R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure S = ⊤) : closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹) = H := by
have hU : closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹) ≤ H := by
rw [closure_le]
rintro - ⟨g, -, rfl⟩
exact hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem g
refine le_antisymm hU fun h hh => ?_
obtain ⟨g, hg, r, hr, rfl⟩ :=
show h ∈ _ from eq_top_iff.mp (closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top hR hR1 hS) (mem_top h)
suffices (⟨r, hr⟩ : R) = (⟨1, hR1⟩ : R) by
simpa only [show r = 1 from Subtype.ext_iff.mp this, mul_one]
apply (isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.mp hR r).unique
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, mul_inv_cancel]
exact H.one_mem
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, inv_one, mul_one]
exact (H.mul_mem_cancel_left (hU hg)).mp hh
/-- **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Set G` is a `rightTransversal` of `H : Subgroup G`
with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Set G`, then `H` is generated by the `Set`
`(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`. -/
theorem closure_mul_image_eq_top (hR : IsComplement H R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure S = ⊤) : closure ((R * S).image fun g =>
⟨g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹, hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem g⟩ : Set H) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← map_subtype_le_map_subtype, MonoidHom.map_closure, Set.image_image]
exact (map_subtype_le ⊤).trans (ge_of_eq (closure_mul_image_eq hR hR1 hS))
/-- **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Finset G` is a `rightTransversal` of `H : Subgroup G`
with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Finset G`, then `H` is generated by the `Finset`
`(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`. -/
theorem closure_mul_image_eq_top' [DecidableEq G] {R S : Finset G}
(hR : IsComplement (H : Set G) R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure (S : Set G) = ⊤) :
closure (((R * S).image fun g => ⟨_, hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem g⟩ : Finset H) : Set H) = ⊤ := by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_mul]
exact closure_mul_image_eq_top hR hR1 hS
variable (H)
theorem exists_finset_card_le_mul [FiniteIndex H] {S : Finset G} (hS : closure (S : Set G) = ⊤) :
∃ T : Finset H, #T ≤ H.index * #S ∧ closure (T : Set H) = ⊤ := by
letI := H.fintypeQuotientOfFiniteIndex
haveI : DecidableEq G := Classical.decEq G
obtain ⟨R₀, hR, hR1⟩ := H.exists_isComplement_right 1
haveI : Fintype R₀ := Fintype.ofEquiv _ hR.rightQuotientEquiv
let R : Finset G := Set.toFinset R₀
replace hR : IsComplement (H : Set G) R := by rwa [Set.coe_toFinset]
replace hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R := by rwa [Set.mem_toFinset]
refine ⟨_, ?_, closure_mul_image_eq_top' hR hR1 hS⟩
calc
_ ≤ #(R * S) := Finset.card_image_le
_ ≤ #R * #S := Finset.card_mul_le
_ = H.index * S.card := congr_arg (· * S.card) ?_
calc
#R = Fintype.card R := (Fintype.card_coe R).symm
_ = _ := (Fintype.card_congr hR.rightQuotientEquiv).symm
_ = Fintype.card (G ⧸ H) := QuotientGroup.card_quotient_rightRel H
_ = H.index := by rw [index_eq_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
/-- **Schreier's Lemma**: A finite index subgroup of a finitely generated
group is finitely generated. -/
instance fg_of_index_ne_zero [hG : Group.FG G] [FiniteIndex H] : Group.FG H := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := hG.1
obtain ⟨T, -, hT⟩ := exists_finset_card_le_mul H hS
exact ⟨⟨T, hT⟩⟩
theorem rank_le_index_mul_rank [hG : Group.FG G] [FiniteIndex H] :
Group.rank H ≤ H.index * Group.rank G := by
haveI := H.fg_of_index_ne_zero
obtain ⟨S, hS₀, hS⟩ := Group.rank_spec G
obtain ⟨T, hT₀, hT⟩ := exists_finset_card_le_mul H hS
calc
Group.rank H ≤ #T := Group.rank_le hT
_ ≤ H.index * #S := hT₀
_ = H.index * Group.rank G := congr_arg (H.index * ·) hS₀
variable (G)
/-- If `G` has `n` commutators `[g₁, g₂]`, then `|G'| ∣ [G : Z(G)] ^ ([G : Z(G)] * n + 1)`,
| where `G'` denotes the commutator of `G`. -/
theorem card_commutator_dvd_index_center_pow [Finite (commutatorSet G)] :
Nat.card (_root_.commutator G) ∣
(center G).index ^ ((center G).index * Nat.card (commutatorSet G) + 1) := by
-- First handle the case when `Z(G)` has infinite index and `[G : Z(G)]` is defined to be `0`
by_cases hG : (center G).index = 0
· simp_rw [hG, zero_mul, zero_add, pow_one, dvd_zero]
haveI : FiniteIndex (center G) := ⟨hG⟩
-- Rewrite as `|Z(G) ∩ G'| * [G' : Z(G) ∩ G'] ∣ [G : Z(G)] ^ ([G : Z(G)] * n) * [G : Z(G)]`
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Schreier.lean | 169 | 177 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series (in one variable)
This file defines (univariate) formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
Formal power series in one variable are defined from multivariate
power series as `PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
The file sets up the (semi)ring structure on univariate power series.
We provide the natural inclusion from polynomials to formal power series.
Additional results can be found in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc`, truncation of power series;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse`, about inverses of power series,
and the fact that power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Order`, the order of a power series at 0,
and application to the fact that power series over an integral domain
form an integral domain.
## Implementation notes
Because of its definition,
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
a lot of proofs and properties from the multivariate case
can be ported to the single variable case.
However, it means that formal power series are indexed by `Unit →₀ ℕ`,
which is of course canonically isomorphic to `ℕ`.
We then build some glue to treat formal power series as if they were indexed by `ℕ`.
Occasionally this leads to proofs that are uglier than expected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Formal power series over a coefficient type `R` -/
abbrev PowerSeries (R : Type*) :=
MvPowerSeries Unit R
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section
-- Porting note: not available in Lean 4
-- local reducible PowerSeries
/--
`R⟦X⟧` is notation for `PowerSeries R`,
the semiring of formal power series in one variable over a semiring `R`.
-/
scoped notation:9000 R "⟦X⟧" => PowerSeries R
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Zero R] : Zero R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Semiring R] : Semiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Ring R] : Ring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S A⟦X⟧ :=
Pi.isScalarTower
instance {A} [Semiring A] [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R A] : Algebra R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
end
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : R⟦X⟧ →ₗ[R] R :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff R (single () n)
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as formal power series. -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.monomial R (single () n)
variable {R}
theorem coeff_def {s : Unit →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : s () = n) : coeff R n = MvPowerSeries.coeff R s := by
rw [coeff, ← h, ← Finsupp.unique_single s]
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : ∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun n => by
rw [← coeff_def]
· apply h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_coeff_eq_zero (φ : R⟦X⟧) : (∀ n, coeff R n φ = 0) ↔ φ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ext h, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc PowerSeries.ext_iff
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
subsingleton
/-- Constructor for formal power series. -/
def mk {R} (f : ℕ → R) : R⟦X⟧ := fun s => f (s ())
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R) : coeff R n (mk f) = f n :=
congr_arg f Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial (m n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
calc
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = _ := MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial _ _ _
_ = if m = n then a else 0 := by simp only [Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff]
theorem monomial_eq_mk (n : ℕ) (a : R) : monomial R n a = mk fun m => if m = n then a else 0 :=
ext fun m => by rw [coeff_monomial, coeff_mk]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
variable (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : R⟦X⟧ →+* R :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff Unit R
/-- The constant formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.C Unit R
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_eq {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] : algebraMap R R⟦X⟧ = C R := rfl
variable {R}
/-- The variable of the formal power series ring. -/
def X : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.X ()
theorem commute_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : Commute φ X :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X _ _
theorem X_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = φ * X :=
MvPowerSeries.X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X ^ n) :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X_pow _ _ _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * φ = φ * X ^ n :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R 0) = constantCoeff R := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero]
rfl
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 φ = constantCoeff R φ := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R 0) = C R := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `rw; rfl` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [monomial, Finsupp.single_zero, MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C]
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R 0 a = C R a := by simp
theorem coeff_C (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then a else 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R 0 (C R a) = a := by
rw [coeff_C, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_ne_zero_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : coeff R n (C R a) = 0 := by
rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff R (n + 1) (C R a) = 0 :=
coeff_ne_zero_C n.succ_ne_zero
theorem C_injective : Function.Injective (C R) := by
intro a b H
| simp_rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at H
simpa only [coeff_zero_C] using H 0
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Basic.lean | 255 | 256 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
/-!
# A predicate on adjoining roots of polynomial
This file defines a predicate `IsAdjoinRoot S f`, which states that the ring `S` can be
constructed by adjoining a specified root of the polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
This predicate is useful when the same ring can be generated by adjoining the root of different
polynomials, and you want to vary which polynomial you're considering.
The results in this file are intended to mirror those in `RingTheory.AdjoinRoot`,
in order to provide an easier way to translate results from one to the other.
## Motivation
`AdjoinRoot` presents one construction of a ring `R[α]`. However, it is possible to obtain
rings of this form in many ways, such as `NumberField.ringOfIntegers ℚ(√-5)`,
or `Algebra.adjoin R {α, α^2}`, or `IntermediateField.adjoin R {α, 2 - α}`,
or even if we want to view `ℂ` as adjoining a root of `X^2 + 1` to `ℝ`.
## Main definitions
The two main predicates in this file are:
* `IsAdjoinRoot S f`: `S` is generated by adjoining a specified root of `f : R[X]` to `R`
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic S f`: `S` is generated by adjoining a root of the monic polynomial
`f : R[X]` to `R`
Using `IsAdjoinRoot` to map into `S`:
* `IsAdjoinRoot.map`: inclusion from `R[X]` to `S`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.root`: the specific root adjoined to `R` to give `S`
Using `IsAdjoinRoot` to map out of `S`:
* `IsAdjoinRoot.repr`: choose a non-unique representative in `R[X]`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.lift`, `IsAdjoinRoot.liftHom`: lift a morphism `R →+* T` to `S →+* T`
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.modByMonicHom`: a unique representative in `R[X]` if `f` is monic
## Main results
* `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot` and `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRootMonic`:
`AdjoinRoot` satisfies the conditions on `IsAdjoinRoot`(`_monic`)
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`: the `root` generates a power basis on `S` over `R`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.aequiv`: algebra isomorphism showing adjoining a root gives a unique ring
up to isomorphism
* `IsAdjoinRoot.ofEquiv`: transfer `IsAdjoinRoot` across an algebra isomorphism
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.minpoly_eq`: the minimal polynomial of the adjoined root of `f` is equal to
`f`, if `f` is irreducible and monic, and `R` is a GCD domain
-/
open scoped Polynomial
open Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u v
-- Porting note: this looks like something that should not be here
-- section MoveMe
--
-- end MoveMe
-- This class doesn't really make sense on a predicate
/-- `IsAdjoinRoot S f` states that the ring `S` can be constructed by adjoining a specified root
of the polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
Compare `PowerBasis R S`, which does not explicitly specify which polynomial we adjoin a root of
(in particular `f` does not need to be the minimal polynomial of the root we adjoin),
and `AdjoinRoot` which constructs a new type.
This is not a typeclass because the choice of root given `S` and `f` is not unique.
-/
structure IsAdjoinRoot {R : Type u} (S : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : R[X]) : Type max u v where
map : R[X] →+* S
map_surjective : Function.Surjective map
ker_map : RingHom.ker map = Ideal.span {f}
algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R S = map.comp Polynomial.C
-- This class doesn't really make sense on a predicate
/-- `IsAdjoinRootMonic S f` states that the ring `S` can be constructed by adjoining a specified
root of the monic polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
As long as `f` is monic, there is a well-defined representation of elements of `S` as polynomials
in `R[X]` of degree lower than `deg f` (see `modByMonicHom` and `coeff`). In particular,
we have `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`.
Bundling `Monic` into this structure is very useful when working with explicit `f`s such as
`X^2 - C a * X - C b` since it saves you carrying around the proofs of monicity.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note: This linter does not exist yet.
structure IsAdjoinRootMonic {R : Type u} (S : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : R[X]) extends IsAdjoinRoot S f where
Monic : Monic f
section Ring
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring S] {f : R[X]} [Algebra R S]
namespace IsAdjoinRoot
/-- `(h : IsAdjoinRoot S f).root` is the root of `f` that can be adjoined to generate `S`. -/
def root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : S :=
h.map X
theorem subsingleton (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton S :=
h.map_surjective.subsingleton
theorem algebraMap_apply (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : R) :
algebraMap R S x = h.map (Polynomial.C x) := by rw [h.algebraMap_eq, RingHom.comp_apply]
theorem mem_ker_map (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) {p} : p ∈ RingHom.ker h.map ↔ f ∣ p := by
rw [h.ker_map, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) {p} : h.map p = 0 ↔ f ∣ p := by
rw [← h.mem_ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker]
@[simp]
theorem map_X (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.map X = h.root := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_self (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.map f = 0 := h.map_eq_zero_iff.mpr dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (p : R[X]) : aeval h.root p = h.map p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun x => by rw [aeval_C, h.algebraMap_apply])
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [map_mul, aeval_C, map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, ← h.algebraMap_apply,
RingHom.map_pow, map_X]
theorem aeval_root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : aeval h.root f = 0 := by rw [aeval_eq, map_self]
/-- Choose an arbitrary representative so that `h.map (h.repr x) = x`.
If `f` is monic, use `IsAdjoinRootMonic.modByMonicHom` for a unique choice of representative.
-/
def repr (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) : R[X] :=
(h.map_surjective x).choose
theorem map_repr (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) : h.map (h.repr x) = x :=
(h.map_surjective x).choose_spec
/-- `repr` preserves zero, up to multiples of `f` -/
theorem repr_zero_mem_span (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.repr 0 ∈ Ideal.span ({f} : Set R[X]) := by
rw [← h.ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker, h.map_repr]
/-- `repr` preserves addition, up to multiples of `f` -/
theorem repr_add_sub_repr_add_repr_mem_span (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x y : S) :
h.repr (x + y) - (h.repr x + h.repr y) ∈ Ideal.span ({f} : Set R[X]) := by
rw [← h.ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker, map_sub, h.map_repr, map_add, h.map_repr, h.map_repr, sub_self]
/-- Extensionality of the `IsAdjoinRoot` structure itself. See `IsAdjoinRootMonic.ext_elem`
for extensionality of the ring elements. -/
theorem ext_map (h h' : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (eq : ∀ x, h.map x = h'.map x) : h = h' := by
cases h; cases h'; congr
exact RingHom.ext eq
/-- Extensionality of the `IsAdjoinRoot` structure itself. See `IsAdjoinRootMonic.ext_elem`
for extensionality of the ring elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext (h h' : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (eq : h.root = h'.root) : h = h' :=
h.ext_map h' fun x => by rw [← h.aeval_eq, ← h'.aeval_eq, eq]
section lift
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] {i : R →+* T} {x : T}
section
variable (hx : f.eval₂ i x = 0)
include hx
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `IsAdjoinRoot.lift` -/
theorem eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (z : S) (w : R[X])
(hzw : h.map w = z) : (h.repr z).eval₂ i x = w.eval₂ i x := by
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← h.map_repr z, ← map_sub, h.map_eq_zero_iff] at hzw
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hzw
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← eval₂_sub, hy, eval₂_mul, hx, zero_mul]
variable (i x)
-- To match `AdjoinRoot.lift`
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism `R →+* T` to `S →+* T` by specifying a root `x` of `f` in `T`,
where `S` is given by adjoining a root of `f` to `R`. -/
def lift (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (hx : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : S →+* T where
toFun z := (h.repr z).eval₂ i x
map_zero' := by
rw [h.eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq hx _ _ (map_zero _), eval₂_zero]
map_add' z w := by
rw [h.eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq hx _ (h.repr z + h.repr w), eval₂_add]
rw [map_add, map_repr, map_repr]
map_one' := by
rw [h.eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq hx _ _ (map_one _), eval₂_one]
map_mul' z w := by
rw [h.eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq hx _ (h.repr z * h.repr w), eval₂_mul]
rw [map_mul, map_repr, map_repr]
variable {i x}
@[simp]
theorem lift_map (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (z : R[X]) : h.lift i x hx (h.map z) = z.eval₂ i x := by
rw [lift, RingHom.coe_mk]
dsimp
rw [h.eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq hx _ _ rfl]
@[simp]
theorem lift_root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.lift i x hx h.root = x := by
rw [← h.map_X, lift_map, eval₂_X]
@[simp]
theorem lift_algebraMap (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (a : R) :
h.lift i x hx (algebraMap R S a) = i a := by rw [h.algebraMap_apply, lift_map, eval₂_C]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `apply_eq_lift` -/
theorem apply_eq_lift (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (g : S →+* T) (hmap : ∀ a, g (algebraMap R S a) = i a)
(hroot : g h.root = x) (a : S) : g a = h.lift i x hx a := by
rw [← h.map_repr a, Polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow (h.repr a)]
simp only [map_sum, map_mul, map_pow, h.map_X, hroot, ← h.algebraMap_apply, hmap, lift_root,
lift_algebraMap]
/-- Unicity of `lift`: a map that agrees on `R` and `h.root` agrees with `lift` everywhere. -/
theorem eq_lift (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (g : S →+* T) (hmap : ∀ a, g (algebraMap R S a) = i a)
(hroot : g h.root = x) : g = h.lift i x hx :=
RingHom.ext (h.apply_eq_lift hx g hmap hroot)
end
variable [Algebra R T] (hx' : aeval x f = 0)
variable (x) in
-- To match `AdjoinRoot.liftHom`
/-- Lift the algebra map `R → T` to `S →ₐ[R] T` by specifying a root `x` of `f` in `T`,
where `S` is given by adjoining a root of `f` to `R`. -/
def liftHom (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : S →ₐ[R] T :=
{ h.lift (algebraMap R T) x hx' with commutes' := fun a => h.lift_algebraMap hx' a }
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftHom (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) :
(h.liftHom x hx' : S →+* T) = h.lift (algebraMap R T) x hx' := rfl
theorem lift_algebraMap_apply (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (z : S) :
h.lift (algebraMap R T) x hx' z = h.liftHom x hx' z := rfl
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_map (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (z : R[X]) : h.liftHom x hx' (h.map z) = aeval x z := by
rw [← lift_algebraMap_apply, lift_map, aeval_def]
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.liftHom x hx' h.root = x := by
rw [← lift_algebraMap_apply, lift_root]
/-- Unicity of `liftHom`: a map that agrees on `h.root` agrees with `liftHom` everywhere. -/
theorem eq_liftHom (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (g : S →ₐ[R] T) (hroot : g h.root = x) :
g = h.liftHom x hx' :=
AlgHom.ext (h.apply_eq_lift hx' g g.commutes hroot)
end lift
end IsAdjoinRoot
namespace AdjoinRoot
variable (f)
/-- `AdjoinRoot f` is indeed given by adjoining a root of `f`. -/
protected def isAdjoinRoot : IsAdjoinRoot (AdjoinRoot f) f where
map := AdjoinRoot.mk f
map_surjective := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
ker_map := by
ext
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, ← @AdjoinRoot.mk_self _ _ f, AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk, Ideal.mem_span_singleton,
← dvd_add_left (dvd_refl f), sub_add_cancel]
algebraMap_eq := AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq f
/-- `AdjoinRoot f` is indeed given by adjoining a root of `f`. If `f` is monic this is more
powerful than `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot`. -/
protected def isAdjoinRootMonic (hf : Monic f) : IsAdjoinRootMonic (AdjoinRoot f) f :=
{ AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot f with Monic := hf }
@[simp]
theorem isAdjoinRoot_map_eq_mk : (AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot f).map = AdjoinRoot.mk f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAdjoinRootMonic_map_eq_mk (hf : f.Monic) :
(AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRootMonic f hf).map = AdjoinRoot.mk f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAdjoinRoot_root_eq_root : (AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot f).root = AdjoinRoot.root f := by
simp only [IsAdjoinRoot.root, AdjoinRoot.root, AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot_map_eq_mk]
@[simp]
theorem isAdjoinRootMonic_root_eq_root (hf : Monic f) :
(AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRootMonic f hf).root = AdjoinRoot.root f := by
simp only [IsAdjoinRoot.root, AdjoinRoot.root, AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRootMonic_map_eq_mk]
end AdjoinRoot
namespace IsAdjoinRootMonic
open IsAdjoinRoot
theorem map_modByMonic (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (g : R[X]) : h.map (g %ₘ f) = h.map g := by
rw [← RingHom.sub_mem_ker_iff, mem_ker_map, modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ h.Monic, sub_right_comm,
sub_self, zero_sub, dvd_neg]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem modByMonic_repr_map (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (g : R[X]) :
h.repr (h.map g) %ₘ f = g %ₘ f :=
modByMonic_eq_of_dvd_sub h.Monic <| by rw [← h.mem_ker_map, RingHom.sub_mem_ker_iff, map_repr]
/-- `IsAdjoinRoot.modByMonicHom` sends the equivalence class of `f` mod `g` to `f %ₘ g`. -/
def modByMonicHom (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : S →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun x := h.repr x %ₘ f
map_add' x y := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← h.map_repr x, ← h.map_repr y, ← map_add]
beta_reduce -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
rw [h.modByMonic_repr_map, add_modByMonic]
map_smul' c x := by
rw [RingHom.id_apply, ← h.map_repr x, Algebra.smul_def, h.algebraMap_apply, ← map_mul]
dsimp only -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10752): added `dsimp only`
rw [h.modByMonic_repr_map, ← smul_eq_C_mul, smul_modByMonic, h.map_repr]
@[simp]
theorem modByMonicHom_map (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (g : R[X]) :
h.modByMonicHom (h.map g) = g %ₘ f := h.modByMonic_repr_map g
@[simp]
theorem map_modByMonicHom (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (x : S) : h.map (h.modByMonicHom x) = x := by
simp [modByMonicHom, map_modByMonic, map_repr]
@[simp]
theorem modByMonicHom_root_pow (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) {n : ℕ} (hdeg : n < natDegree f) :
h.modByMonicHom (h.root ^ n) = X ^ n := by
nontriviality R
rw [← h.map_X, ← map_pow, modByMonicHom_map, modByMonic_eq_self_iff h.Monic, degree_X_pow]
contrapose! hdeg
simpa [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le] using hdeg
@[simp]
theorem modByMonicHom_root (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (hdeg : 1 < natDegree f) :
h.modByMonicHom h.root = X := by simpa using modByMonicHom_root_pow h hdeg
/-- The basis on `S` generated by powers of `h.root`.
Auxiliary definition for `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`. -/
def basis (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : Basis (Fin (natDegree f)) R S :=
Basis.ofRepr
{ toFun := fun x => (h.modByMonicHom x).toFinsupp.comapDomain _ Fin.val_injective.injOn
invFun := fun g => h.map (ofFinsupp (g.mapDomain Fin.val))
left_inv := fun x => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· subsingleton [h.subsingleton]
simp only
rw [Finsupp.mapDomain_comapDomain, Polynomial.eta, h.map_modByMonicHom x]
· exact Fin.val_injective
intro i hi
refine Set.mem_range.mpr ⟨⟨i, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
contrapose! hi
simp only [Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply, Classical.not_not, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne,
modByMonicHom, LinearMap.coe_mk, Finset.mem_coe]
obtain rfl | hf := eq_or_ne f 1
· simp
· exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| (natDegree_modByMonic_lt _ h.Monic hf).trans_le hi
right_inv := fun g => by
nontriviality R
ext i
simp only [h.modByMonicHom_map, Finsupp.comapDomain_apply, Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply]
rw [(Polynomial.modByMonic_eq_self_iff h.Monic).mpr, Polynomial.coeff]
· rw [Finsupp.mapDomain_apply Fin.val_injective]
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h.Monic.ne_zero, degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero]
intro m hm
rw [Polynomial.coeff]
rw [Finsupp.mapDomain_notin_range]
rw [Set.mem_range, not_exists]
rintro i rfl
exact i.prop.not_le hm
map_add' := fun x y => by
rw [map_add, toFinsupp_add, Finsupp.comapDomain_add_of_injective Fin.val_injective]
-- Porting note: the original simp proof with the same lemmas does not work
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- simp only [map_add, Finsupp.comapDomain_add_of_injective Fin.val_injective, toFinsupp_add]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
rw [map_smul, toFinsupp_smul, Finsupp.comapDomain_smul_of_injective Fin.val_injective,
RingHom.id_apply] }
-- Porting note: the original simp proof with the same lemmas does not work
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- simp only [map_smul, Finsupp.comapDomain_smul_of_injective Fin.val_injective,
-- RingHom.id_apply, toFinsupp_smul] }
@[simp]
theorem basis_apply (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (i) : h.basis i = h.root ^ (i : ℕ) :=
Basis.apply_eq_iff.mpr <|
show (h.modByMonicHom (h.toIsAdjoinRoot.root ^ (i : ℕ))).toFinsupp.comapDomain _
Fin.val_injective.injOn = Finsupp.single _ _ by
ext j
rw [Finsupp.comapDomain_apply, modByMonicHom_root_pow]
· rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_apply_left Fin.val_injective]
· exact i.is_lt
theorem deg_pos [Nontrivial S] (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : 0 < natDegree f := by
rcases h.basis.index_nonempty with ⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩
exact (Nat.zero_le _).trans_lt hi
theorem deg_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : natDegree f ≠ 0 :=
h.deg_pos.ne'
/-- If `f` is monic, the powers of `h.root` form a basis. -/
@[simps! gen dim basis]
def powerBasis (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : PowerBasis R S where
gen := h.root
dim := natDegree f
basis := h.basis
basis_eq_pow := h.basis_apply
@[simp]
theorem basis_repr (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (x : S) (i : Fin (natDegree f)) :
h.basis.repr x i = (h.modByMonicHom x).coeff (i : ℕ) := by
change (h.modByMonicHom x).toFinsupp.comapDomain _ Fin.val_injective.injOn i = _
rw [Finsupp.comapDomain_apply, Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply]
theorem basis_one (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (hdeg : 1 < natDegree f) :
h.basis ⟨1, hdeg⟩ = h.root := by rw [h.basis_apply, Fin.val_mk, pow_one]
/-- `IsAdjoinRootMonic.liftPolyₗ` lifts a linear map on polynomials to a linear map on `S`. -/
@[simps!]
def liftPolyₗ {T : Type*} [AddCommGroup T] [Module R T] (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f)
(g : R[X] →ₗ[R] T) : S →ₗ[R] T :=
g.comp h.modByMonicHom
/-- `IsAdjoinRootMonic.coeff h x i` is the `i`th coefficient of the representative of `x : S`.
-/
def coeff (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : S →ₗ[R] ℕ → R :=
h.liftPolyₗ
{ toFun := Polynomial.coeff
map_add' := fun p q => funext (Polynomial.coeff_add p q)
map_smul' := fun c p => funext (Polynomial.coeff_smul c p) }
theorem coeff_apply_lt (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (z : S) (i : ℕ) (hi : i < natDegree f) :
h.coeff z i = h.basis.repr z ⟨i, hi⟩ := by
simp only [coeff, LinearMap.comp_apply, Finsupp.lcoeFun_apply, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, liftPolyₗ_apply, LinearMap.coe_mk, h.basis_repr]
rfl
theorem coeff_apply_coe (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (z : S) (i : Fin (natDegree f)) :
h.coeff z i = h.basis.repr z i := h.coeff_apply_lt z i i.prop
theorem coeff_apply_le (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (z : S) (i : ℕ) (hi : natDegree f ≤ i) :
h.coeff z i = 0 := by
simp only [coeff, LinearMap.comp_apply, Finsupp.lcoeFun_apply, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, liftPolyₗ_apply, LinearMap.coe_mk, h.basis_repr]
nontriviality R
exact
Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
((degree_modByMonic_lt _ h.Monic).trans_le (Polynomial.degree_le_of_natDegree_le hi))
theorem coeff_apply (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (z : S) (i : ℕ) :
h.coeff z i = if hi : i < natDegree f then h.basis.repr z ⟨i, hi⟩ else 0 := by
split_ifs with hi
· exact h.coeff_apply_lt z i hi
· exact h.coeff_apply_le z i (le_of_not_lt hi)
theorem coeff_root_pow (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) {n} (hn : n < natDegree f) :
h.coeff (h.root ^ n) = Pi.single n 1 := by
ext i
rw [coeff_apply]
split_ifs with hi
· calc
h.basis.repr (h.root ^ n) ⟨i, _⟩ = h.basis.repr (h.basis ⟨n, hn⟩) ⟨i, hi⟩ := by
rw [h.basis_apply, Fin.val_mk]
_ = Pi.single (f := fun _ => R) ((⟨n, hn⟩ : Fin _) : ℕ) (1 : (fun _ => R) n)
↑(⟨i, _⟩ : Fin _) := by
rw [h.basis.repr_self, ← Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single,
Finsupp.single_apply_left Fin.val_injective]
_ = Pi.single (f := fun _ => R) n 1 i := by rw [Fin.val_mk, Fin.val_mk]
· refine (Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) ?_ (1 : (fun _ => R) n)).symm
rintro rfl
simp [hi] at hn
theorem coeff_one [Nontrivial S] (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : h.coeff 1 = Pi.single 0 1 := by
rw [← h.coeff_root_pow h.deg_pos, pow_zero]
theorem coeff_root (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (hdeg : 1 < natDegree f) :
h.coeff h.root = Pi.single 1 1 := by rw [← h.coeff_root_pow hdeg, pow_one]
theorem coeff_algebraMap [Nontrivial S] (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) (x : R) :
h.coeff (algebraMap R S x) = Pi.single 0 x := by
ext i
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, map_smul, coeff_one, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
refine (Pi.apply_single (fun _ y => x * y) ?_ 0 1 i).trans (by simp)
simp
theorem ext_elem (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) ⦃x y : S⦄
(hxy : ∀ i < natDegree f, h.coeff x i = h.coeff y i) : x = y :=
EquivLike.injective h.basis.equivFun <|
funext fun i => by
rw [Basis.equivFun_apply, ← h.coeff_apply_coe, Basis.equivFun_apply, ← h.coeff_apply_coe,
hxy i i.prop]
theorem ext_elem_iff (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) {x y : S} :
x = y ↔ ∀ i < natDegree f, h.coeff x i = h.coeff y i :=
⟨fun hxy _ _=> hxy ▸ rfl, fun hxy => h.ext_elem hxy⟩
theorem coeff_injective (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : Function.Injective h.coeff := fun _ _ hxy =>
h.ext_elem fun _ _ => hxy ▸ rfl
theorem isIntegral_root (h : IsAdjoinRootMonic S f) : IsIntegral R h.root :=
⟨f, h.Monic, h.aeval_root⟩
end IsAdjoinRootMonic
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] {f : R[X]}
| namespace IsAdjoinRoot
section lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_self_apply (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) :
h.lift (algebraMap R S) h.root h.aeval_root x = x := by
rw [← h.map_repr x, lift_map, ← aeval_def, h.aeval_eq]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IsAdjoinRoot.lean | 530 | 537 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
| lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,122 | 1,123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Renaming variables of polynomials
This file establishes the `rename` operation on multivariate polynomials,
which modifies the set of variables.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.rename`
* `MvPolynomial.renameEquiv`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ α : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R S : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` `[CommSemiring S]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R` elements of the coefficient ring
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ α`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {σ τ α R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
namespace MvPolynomial
section Rename
/-- Rename all the variables in a multivariable polynomial. -/
def rename (f : σ → τ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval (X ∘ f)
theorem rename_C (f : σ → τ) (r : R) : rename f (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem rename_X (f : σ → τ) (i : σ) : rename f (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X (f i) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
theorem map_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p
(fun a => by simp only [map_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, map_add]) fun p n hp => by
simp only [hp, rename_X, map_X, map_mul]
lemma map_comp_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) :
(map f).comp (rename g).toRingHom = (rename g).toRingHom.comp (map f) :=
RingHom.ext fun p ↦ map_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _ by
simp only [rename, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
-- Porting note: the Lean 3 proof of this was very fragile and included a nonterminal `simp`.
-- Hopefully this is less prone to breaking
rw [eval₂_comp_left (eval₂Hom (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial α R)) (X ∘ g)) C (X ∘ f) p]
simp only [comp_def, eval₂Hom_X']
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext1; simp only [comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, eval₂Hom_C]
lemma rename_comp_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) :
(rename (R := R) g).comp (rename f) = rename (g ∘ f) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ rename_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_id : rename id = AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ eval₂_eta p
lemma rename_id_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : rename id p = p := by
simp
theorem rename_monomial (f : σ → τ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
rename f (monomial d r) = monomial (d.mapDomain f) r := by
rw [rename, aeval_monomial, monomial_eq (s := Finsupp.mapDomain f d),
Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index]
· rfl
· exact fun n => pow_zero _
· exact fun n i₁ i₂ => pow_add _ _ _
theorem rename_eq (f : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename f p = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p := by
simp only [rename, aeval_def, eval₂, Finsupp.mapDomain, algebraMap_eq, comp_apply,
X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index]
rfl
theorem rename_injective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) := by
have :
(rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) :=
funext (rename_eq f)
rw [this]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_injective (Finsupp.mapDomain_injective hf)
theorem rename_leftInverse {f : σ → τ} {g : τ → σ} (hf : Function.LeftInverse f g) :
Function.LeftInverse (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) (rename g) := by
intro x
simp [hf.comp_eq_id]
theorem rename_rightInverse {f : σ → τ} {g : τ → σ} (hf : Function.RightInverse f g) :
Function.RightInverse (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) (rename g) :=
rename_leftInverse hf
theorem rename_surjective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) :=
let ⟨_, hf⟩ := hf.hasRightInverse; rename_rightInverse hf |>.surjective
section
variable {f : σ → τ} (hf : Function.Injective f)
open Classical in
/-- Given a function between sets of variables `f : σ → τ` that is injective with proof `hf`,
`MvPolynomial.killCompl hf` is the `AlgHom` from `R[τ]` to `R[σ]` that is left inverse to
`rename f : R[σ] → R[τ]` and sends the variables in the complement of the range of `f` to `0`. -/
def killCompl : MvPolynomial τ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval fun i => if h : i ∈ Set.range f then X <| (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
theorem killCompl_C (r : R) : killCompl hf (C r) = C r := algHom_C _ _
theorem killCompl_comp_rename : (killCompl hf).comp (rename f) = AlgHom.id R _ :=
algHom_ext fun i => by
dsimp
rw [rename, killCompl, aeval_X, comp_apply, aeval_X, dif_pos, Equiv.ofInjective_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem killCompl_rename_app (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : killCompl hf (rename f p) = p :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (killCompl_comp_rename hf) p
end
section
variable (R)
/-- `MvPolynomial.rename e` is an equivalence when `e` is. -/
@[simps apply]
def renameEquiv (f : σ ≃ τ) : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
{ rename f with
toFun := rename f
invFun := rename f.symm
left_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.symm_comp_self, rename_id_apply]
right_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.self_comp_symm, rename_id_apply] }
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_refl : renameEquiv R (Equiv.refl σ) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_symm (f : σ ≃ τ) : (renameEquiv R f).symm = renameEquiv R f.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_trans (e : σ ≃ τ) (f : τ ≃ α) :
(renameEquiv R e).trans (renameEquiv R f) = renameEquiv R (e.trans f) :=
AlgEquiv.ext (rename_rename e f)
end
section
variable (f : R →+* S) (k : σ → τ) (g : τ → S) (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
theorem eval₂_rename : (rename k p).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f (g ∘ k) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval_rename (g : τ → R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : eval g (rename k p) = eval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem eval₂Hom_rename : eval₂Hom f g (rename k p) = eval₂Hom f (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem aeval_rename [Algebra R S] : aeval g (rename k p) = aeval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂Hom_rename _ _ _ _
lemma aeval_comp_rename [Algebra R S] :
(aeval (R := R) g).comp (rename k) = MvPolynomial.aeval (g ∘ k) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ aeval_rename k g p
theorem rename_eval₂ (g : τ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename k (p.eval₂ C (g ∘ k)) = (rename k p).eval₂ C (rename k ∘ g) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem rename_prod_mk_eval₂ (j : τ) (g : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename (Prod.mk j) (p.eval₂ C g) = p.eval₂ C fun x => rename (Prod.mk j) (g x) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval₂_rename_prod_mk (g : σ × τ → S) (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial τ R) :
(rename (Prod.mk i) p).eval₂ f g = eval₂ f (fun j => g (i, j)) p := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval_rename_prod_mk (g : σ × τ → R) (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial τ R) :
eval g (rename (Prod.mk i) p) = eval (fun j => g (i, j)) p :=
eval₂_rename_prod_mk (RingHom.id _) _ _ _
end
/-- Every polynomial is a polynomial in finitely many variables. -/
theorem exists_finset_rename (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
∃ (s : Finset σ) (q : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R), p = rename (↑) q := by
classical
apply induction_on p
· intro r
exact ⟨∅, C r, by rw [rename_C]⟩
· rintro p q ⟨s, p, rfl⟩ ⟨t, q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine rename (Subtype.map id ?_) p + rename (Subtype.map id ?_) q <;>
simp +contextual only [id, true_or, or_true,
Finset.mem_union, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [rename_rename, map_add]
rfl
· rintro p n ⟨s, p, rfl⟩
refine ⟨insert n s, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine rename (Subtype.map id ?_) p * X ⟨n, s.mem_insert_self n⟩
simp +contextual only [id, or_true, Finset.mem_insert, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [rename_rename, rename_X, Subtype.coe_mk, map_mul]
rfl
/-- `exists_finset_rename` for two polynomials at once: for any two polynomials `p₁`, `p₂` in a
polynomial semiring `R[σ]` of possibly infinitely many variables, `exists_finset_rename₂` yields
a finite subset `s` of `σ` such that both `p₁` and `p₂` are contained in the polynomial semiring
`R[s]` of finitely many variables. -/
theorem exists_finset_rename₂ (p₁ p₂ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
∃ (s : Finset σ) (q₁ q₂ : MvPolynomial s R), p₁ = rename (↑) q₁ ∧ p₂ = rename (↑) q₂ := by
obtain ⟨s₁, q₁, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename p₁
obtain ⟨s₂, q₂, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename p₂
classical
use s₁ ∪ s₂
use rename (Set.inclusion s₁.subset_union_left) q₁
use rename (Set.inclusion s₁.subset_union_right) q₂
constructor <;> simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- Every polynomial is a polynomial in finitely many variables. -/
theorem exists_fin_rename (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n → σ) (_hf : Injective f) (q : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R), p = rename f q := by
obtain ⟨s, q, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename p
let n := Fintype.card { x // x ∈ s }
let e := Fintype.equivFin { x // x ∈ s }
refine ⟨n, (↑) ∘ e.symm, Subtype.val_injective.comp e.symm.injective, rename e q, ?_⟩
rw [← rename_rename, rename_rename e]
simp only [Function.comp_def, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, rename_rename]
end Rename
theorem eval₂_cast_comp (f : σ → τ) (c : ℤ →+* R) (g : τ → R) (p : MvPolynomial σ ℤ) :
eval₂ c (g ∘ f) p = eval₂ c g (rename f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p (fun n => by simp only [eval₂_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, rename, eval₂_add, map_add])
fun p n hp => by simp only [eval₂_mul, hp, eval₂_X, comp_apply, map_mul, rename_X, eval₂_mul]
section Coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_rename_mapDomain (f : σ → τ) (hf : Injective f) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(rename f φ).coeff (d.mapDomain f) = φ.coeff d := by
classical
apply φ.induction_on' (P := fun ψ => coeff (Finsupp.mapDomain f d) ((rename f) ψ) = coeff d ψ)
-- Lean could no longer infer the motive
· intro u r
rw [rename_monomial, coeff_monomial, coeff_monomial]
simp only [(Finsupp.mapDomain_injective hf).eq_iff]
· intros
simp only [*, map_add, coeff_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_rename_embDomain (f : σ ↪ τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(rename f φ).coeff (d.embDomain f) = φ.coeff d := by
rw [Finsupp.embDomain_eq_mapDomain f, coeff_rename_mapDomain f f.injective]
theorem coeff_rename_eq_zero (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (d : τ →₀ ℕ)
(h : ∀ u : σ →₀ ℕ, u.mapDomain f = d → φ.coeff u = 0) : (rename f φ).coeff d = 0 := by
classical
rw [rename_eq, ← not_mem_support_iff]
intro H
replace H := mapDomain_support H
rw [Finset.mem_image] at H
obtain ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩ := H
specialize h u rfl
simp? at h hu says simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq] at h hu
contradiction
theorem coeff_rename_ne_zero (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (d : τ →₀ ℕ)
(h : (rename f φ).coeff d ≠ 0) : ∃ u : σ →₀ ℕ, u.mapDomain f = d ∧ φ.coeff u ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h
apply coeff_rename_eq_zero _ _ _ h
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_rename {τ : Type*} (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
constantCoeff (rename f φ) = constantCoeff φ := by
apply φ.induction_on
· intro a
simp only [constantCoeff_C, rename_C]
· intro p q hp hq
simp only [hp, hq, map_add]
· intro p n hp
simp only [hp, rename_X, constantCoeff_X, map_mul]
end Coeff
section Support
theorem support_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} [DecidableEq τ]
(h : Function.Injective f) :
(rename f p).support = Finset.image (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p.support := by
rw [rename_eq]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_support_of_injective (Finsupp.mapDomain_injective h) _
end Support
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Rename.lean | 346 | 350 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Geoffrey Irving. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler, Geoffrey Irving, Stefan Kebekus
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.Units
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.OfScalars
/-!
# Various ways to combine analytic functions
We show that the following are analytic:
1. Cartesian products of analytic functions
2. Arithmetic on analytic functions: `mul`, `smul`, `inv`, `div`
3. Finite sums and products: `Finset.sum`, `Finset.prod`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology
open Filter Asymptotics ENNReal NNReal
variable {α : Type*}
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E F G H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [NormedAddCommGroup H]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕝] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕝]
variable {A : Type*} [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
/-!
### Constants are analytic
-/
theorem hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e ⊤ := by
refine ⟨by simp, WithTop.top_pos, fun _ => hasSum_single 0 fun n hn => ?_⟩
simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries_apply hn]
theorem hasFPowerSeriesAt_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e :=
⟨⊤, hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem analyticAt_const {v : F} {x : E} : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) x :=
⟨constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v, hasFPowerSeriesAt_const⟩
theorem analyticOnNhd_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
fun _ _ => analyticAt_const
theorem analyticWithinAt_const {v : F} {s : Set E} {x : E} : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s x :=
analyticAt_const.analyticWithinAt
theorem analyticOn_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
analyticOnNhd_const.analyticOn
/-!
### Addition, negation, subtraction, scalar multiplication
-/
section
variable {f g : E → F} {pf pg : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {s : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
{c : 𝕜}
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.add (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f pf s x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g pg s x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) s x r :=
{ r_le := le_trans (le_min_iff.2 ⟨hf.r_le, hg.r_le⟩) (pf.min_radius_le_radius_add pg)
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun hy h'y => (hf.hasSum hy h'y).add (hg.hasSum hy h'y) }
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.add (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x r) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) x r :=
{ r_le := le_trans (le_min_iff.2 ⟨hf.r_le, hg.r_le⟩) (pf.min_radius_le_radius_add pg)
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun hy => (hf.hasSum hy).add (hg.hasSum hy) }
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.add
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f pf s x) (hg : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt g pg s x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (f + g) (pf + pg) s x := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.add (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) (hg : HasFPowerSeriesAt g pg x) :
| HasFPowerSeriesAt (f + g) (pf + pg) x := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.add (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hg : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (f + g) s x :=
let ⟨_, hpf⟩ := hf
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Constructions.lean | 91 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Natural operations on ordinals
The goal of this file is to define natural addition and multiplication on ordinals, also known as
the Hessenberg sum and product, and provide a basic API. The natural addition of two ordinals
`a ♯ b` is recursively defined as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for `a' < a`
and `b' < b`. The natural multiplication `a ⨳ b` is likewise recursively defined as the least
ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for any `a' < a` and
`b' < b`.
These operations form a rich algebraic structure: they're commutative, associative, preserve order,
have the usual `0` and `1` from ordinals, and distribute over one another.
Moreover, these operations are the addition and multiplication of ordinals when viewed as
combinatorial `Game`s. This makes them particularly useful for game theory.
Finally, both operations admit simple, intuitive descriptions in terms of the Cantor normal form.
The natural addition of two ordinals corresponds to adding their Cantor normal forms as if they were
polynomials in `ω`. Likewise, their natural multiplication corresponds to multiplying the Cantor
normal forms as polynomials.
## Implementation notes
Given the rich algebraic structure of these two operations, we choose to create a type synonym
`NatOrdinal`, where we provide the appropriate instances. However, to avoid casting back and forth
between both types, we attempt to prove and state most results on `Ordinal`.
## Todo
- Prove the characterizations of natural addition and multiplication in terms of the Cantor normal
form.
-/
universe u v
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
/-! ### Basic casts between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal` -/
/-- A type synonym for ordinals with natural addition and multiplication. -/
def NatOrdinal : Type _ :=
Ordinal deriving Zero, Inhabited, One, WellFoundedRelation
-- The `LinearOrder, `SuccOrder` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance NatOrdinal.instLinearOrder : LinearOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instLinearOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instSuccOrder : SuccOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instSuccOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instOrderBot : OrderBot NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instOrderBot
instance NatOrdinal.instNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instNoMaxOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instZeroLEOneClass
instance NatOrdinal.instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : NatOrdinal) := Ordinal.instNeZeroOne
instance NatOrdinal.uncountable : Uncountable NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.uncountable
/-- The identity function between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def Ordinal.toNatOrdinal : Ordinal ≃o NatOrdinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
/-- The identity function between `NatOrdinal` and `Ordinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def NatOrdinal.toOrdinal : NatOrdinal ≃o Ordinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_symm_eq : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal.symm = Ordinal.toNatOrdinal :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal (a : NatOrdinal) : a.toOrdinal.toNatOrdinal = a :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedLT NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.wellFoundedLT
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot NatOrdinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
@[simp] theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : NatOrdinal) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_zero : toOrdinal 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_one : toOrdinal 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_eq_zero {a} : toOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_eq_one {a} : toOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_max (a b : NatOrdinal) : toOrdinal (max a b) = max (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_min (a b : NatOrdinal) : toOrdinal (min a b) = min (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
theorem succ_def (a : NatOrdinal) : succ a = toNatOrdinal (toOrdinal a + 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_le (o : NatOrdinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
Ordinal.zero_le o
theorem not_lt_zero (o : NatOrdinal) : ¬ o < 0 :=
Ordinal.not_lt_zero o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {o : NatOrdinal} : o < 1 ↔ o = 0 :=
Ordinal.lt_one_iff_zero
/-- A recursor for `NatOrdinal`. Use as `induction x`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator, induction_eliminator]
protected def rec {β : NatOrdinal → Sort*} (h : ∀ a, β (toNatOrdinal a)) : ∀ a, β a := fun a =>
h (toOrdinal a)
/-- `Ordinal.induction` but for `NatOrdinal`. -/
theorem induction {p : NatOrdinal → Prop} : ∀ (i) (_ : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j), p i :=
Ordinal.induction
instance small_Iio (a : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio a) := Ordinal.small_Iio a
instance small_Iic (a : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic a) := Ordinal.small_Iic a
instance small_Ico (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ico a b) := Ordinal.small_Ico a b
instance small_Icc (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Icc a b) := Ordinal.small_Icc a b
instance small_Ioo (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ioo a b) := Ordinal.small_Ioo a b
instance small_Ioc (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ioc a b) := Ordinal.small_Ioc a b
end NatOrdinal
namespace Ordinal
variable {a b c : Ordinal.{u}}
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_symm_eq : toNatOrdinal.symm = NatOrdinal.toOrdinal := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal (a : Ordinal) : a.toNatOrdinal.toOrdinal = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_zero : toNatOrdinal 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_one : toNatOrdinal 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_max (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (max a b) = max (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_min (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (min a b) = min (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
/-! We place the definitions of `nadd` and `nmul` before actually developing their API, as this
guarantees we only need to open the `NaturalOps` locale once. -/
/-- Natural addition on ordinals `a ♯ b`, also known as the Hessenberg sum, is recursively defined
as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for all `a' < a` and `b' < b`. In contrast
to normal ordinal addition, it is commutative.
Natural addition can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from adding up
corresponding coefficients in the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b`. -/
noncomputable def nadd (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
max (⨆ x : Iio a, succ (nadd x.1 b)) (⨆ x : Iio b, succ (nadd a x.1))
termination_by (a, b)
decreasing_by all_goals cases x; decreasing_tactic
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:65 " ♯ " => Ordinal.nadd
open NaturalOps
/-- Natural multiplication on ordinals `a ⨳ b`, also known as the Hessenberg product, is recursively
defined as the least ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for all
`a' < a` and `b < b'`. In contrast to normal ordinal multiplication, it is commutative and
distributive (over natural addition).
Natural multiplication can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from multiplying
the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b` as if they were polynomials in `ω`. Addition of exponents is
done via natural addition. -/
noncomputable def nmul (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, nmul a' b ♯ nmul a b' < c ♯ nmul a' b'}
termination_by (a, b)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:70 " ⨳ " => Ordinal.nmul
/-! ### Natural addition -/
theorem lt_nadd_iff : a < b ♯ c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' ♯ c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b ♯ c' := by
rw [nadd]
simp [Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff]
theorem nadd_le_iff : b ♯ c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' ♯ c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b ♯ c' < a := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_nadd_iff]
simp
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_left (h : b < c) (a) : a ♯ b < a ♯ c :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_right (h : b < c) (a) : b ♯ a < c ♯ a :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
theorem nadd_le_nadd_left (h : b ≤ c) (a) : a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_left h a).le
· exact le_rfl
theorem nadd_le_nadd_right (h : b ≤ c) (a) : b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_right h a).le
· exact le_rfl
variable (a b)
theorem nadd_comm (a b) : a ♯ b = b ♯ a := by
rw [nadd, nadd, max_comm]
congr <;> ext x <;> cases x <;> apply congr_arg _ (nadd_comm _ _)
termination_by (a, b)
@[deprecated "blsub will soon be deprecated" (since := "2024-11-18")]
theorem blsub_nadd_of_mono {f : ∀ c < a ♯ b, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) :
blsub.{u,v} _ f =
max (blsub.{u, v} a fun a' ha' => f (a' ♯ b) <| nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b)
(blsub.{u, v} b fun b' hb' => f (a ♯ b') <| nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) := by
apply (blsub_le_iff.2 fun i h => _).antisymm (max_le _ _)
· intro i h
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 h with (⟨a', ha', hi⟩ | ⟨b', hb', hi⟩)
· exact lt_max_of_lt_left ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ ha'))
· exact lt_max_of_lt_right ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ hb'))
all_goals
apply blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{u, u, v}
rintro c ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
private theorem iSup_nadd_of_monotone {a b} (f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (h : Monotone f) :
⨆ x : Iio (a ♯ b), f x = max (⨆ a' : Iio a, f (a'.1 ♯ b)) (⨆ b' : Iio b, f (a ♯ b'.1)) := by
apply (max_le _ _).antisymm'
· rw [Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx, hi⟩ | ⟨x, hx, hi⟩ := lt_nadd_iff.1 hi
· exact le_max_of_le_left ((h hi).trans <| Ordinal.le_iSup (fun x : Iio a ↦ _) ⟨x, hx⟩)
· exact le_max_of_le_right ((h hi).trans <| Ordinal.le_iSup (fun x : Iio b ↦ _) ⟨x, hx⟩)
all_goals
apply csSup_le_csSup' (bddAbove_of_small _)
rintro _ ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, rfl⟩
refine mem_range_self (⟨_, ?_⟩ : Iio _)
apply_rules [nadd_lt_nadd_left, nadd_lt_nadd_right]
theorem nadd_assoc (a b c) : a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ (b ♯ c) := by
unfold nadd
rw [iSup_nadd_of_monotone fun a' ↦ succ (a' ♯ c), iSup_nadd_of_monotone fun b' ↦ succ (a ♯ b'),
max_assoc]
· congr <;> ext x <;> cases x <;> apply congr_arg _ (nadd_assoc _ _ _)
· exact succ_mono.comp fun x y h ↦ nadd_le_nadd_left h _
· exact succ_mono.comp fun x y h ↦ nadd_le_nadd_right h _
termination_by (a, b, c)
@[simp]
theorem nadd_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ♯ 0 = a := by
rw [nadd, ciSup_of_empty fun _ : Iio 0 ↦ _, sup_bot_eq]
convert iSup_succ a
rename_i x
cases x
exact nadd_zero _
termination_by a
@[simp]
theorem zero_nadd : 0 ♯ a = a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nadd_one (a : Ordinal) : a ♯ 1 = succ a := by
rw [nadd, ciSup_unique (s := fun _ : Iio 1 ↦ _), Iio_one_default_eq, nadd_zero,
max_eq_right_iff, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rwa [nadd_one, succ_le_succ_iff, succ_le_iff]
termination_by a
@[simp]
theorem one_nadd : 1 ♯ a = succ a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_one]
theorem nadd_succ : a ♯ succ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← nadd_one (a ♯ b), nadd_assoc, nadd_one]
theorem succ_nadd : succ a ♯ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← one_nadd (a ♯ b), ← nadd_assoc, one_nadd]
@[simp]
theorem nadd_nat (n : ℕ) : a ♯ n = a + n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, nadd_succ, add_succ, hn]
@[simp]
theorem nat_nadd (n : ℕ) : ↑n ♯ a = a + n := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_nat]
theorem add_le_nadd : a + b ≤ a ♯ b := by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp
| succ c h =>
rwa [add_succ, nadd_succ, succ_le_succ_iff]
| isLimit c hc H =>
rw [(isNormal_add_right a).apply_of_isLimit hc, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
exact (H i hi).trans (nadd_le_nadd_left hi.le a)
end Ordinal
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal NaturalOps
instance : Add NatOrdinal := ⟨nadd⟩
instance : SuccAddOrder NatOrdinal := ⟨fun x => (nadd_one x).symm⟩
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : NatOrdinal} :
a < b + c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' + c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b + c' :=
Ordinal.lt_nadd_iff
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : NatOrdinal} :
b + c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' + c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b + c' < a :=
Ordinal.nadd_le_iff
instance : AddLeftStrictMono NatOrdinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_lt_nadd_left h a⟩
instance : AddLeftMono NatOrdinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_left h a⟩
instance : AddLeftReflectLE NatOrdinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c h => by
by_contra! h'
exact h.not_lt (add_lt_add_left h' a)⟩
instance : AddCommMonoid NatOrdinal :=
{ add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := nadd_assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_nadd
add_zero := nadd_zero
add_comm := nadd_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec }
instance : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid NatOrdinal :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun _ _ => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun _ _ _ => le_of_add_le_add_left }
instance : AddMonoidWithOne NatOrdinal :=
AddMonoidWithOne.unary
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_natCast (n : ℕ) : toOrdinal n = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· rfl
· change (toOrdinal n) ♯ 1 = n + 1
rw [hn]; exact nadd_one n
instance : CharZero NatOrdinal where
cast_injective m n h := by
apply_fun toOrdinal at h
simpa using h
end NatOrdinal
open NatOrdinal
open NaturalOps
namespace Ordinal
theorem nadd_eq_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ♯ b = toOrdinal (toNatOrdinal a + toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_natCast (n : ℕ) : toNatOrdinal n = n := by
rw [← toOrdinal_natCast n]
rfl
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
@add_le_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a ↔ b ≤ c :=
@_root_.add_le_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_le_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c ≤ b ♯ d :=
@add_le_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_lt_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_left_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c → b = c :=
@_root_.add_left_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
theorem nadd_right_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = c ♯ b → a = c :=
@_root_.add_right_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_left_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c ↔ b = c :=
@add_left_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_right_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a = c ♯ a ↔ b = c :=
@add_right_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
theorem le_nadd_self {a b} : a ≤ b ♯ a := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_nadd_left {a b c} (h : a ≤ c) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_nadd_self.trans (nadd_le_nadd_left h b)
theorem le_self_nadd {a b} : a ≤ a ♯ b := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_nadd_right {a b c} (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_self_nadd.trans (nadd_le_nadd_right h c)
theorem nadd_left_comm : ∀ a b c, a ♯ (b ♯ c) = b ♯ (a ♯ c) :=
@add_left_comm NatOrdinal _
theorem nadd_right_comm : ∀ a b c, a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ c ♯ b :=
@add_right_comm NatOrdinal _
/-! ### Natural multiplication -/
variable {a b c d : Ordinal.{u}}
@[deprecated "avoid using the definition of `nmul` directly" (since := "2024-11-19")]
theorem nmul_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ⨳ b = sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b'} := by
rw [nmul]
/-- The set in the definition of `nmul` is nonempty. -/
private theorem nmul_nonempty (a b : Ordinal.{u}) :
{c : Ordinal.{u} | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b'}.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : BddAbove ((fun x ↦ x.1 ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ x.2) '' Set.Iio a ×ˢ Set.Iio b) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
exact ⟨_, fun x hx y hy ↦
(lt_succ_of_le <| hc <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| Set.mk_mem_prod hx hy).trans_le le_self_nadd⟩
theorem nmul_nadd_lt {a' b' : Ordinal} (ha : a' < a) (hb : b' < b) :
a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
conv_rhs => rw [nmul]
exact csInf_mem (nmul_nonempty a b) a' ha b' hb
theorem nmul_nadd_le {a' b' : Ordinal} (ha : a' ≤ a) (hb : b' ≤ b) :
a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' ≤ a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hb with (hb | rfl)
· exact (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb).le
· rw [nadd_comm]
· exact le_rfl
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/NaturalOps.lean | 492 | 492 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DFinsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basic
/-!
# Some finiteness results of tensor product
This file contains some finiteness results of tensor product.
- `TensorProduct.exists_multiset`, `TensorProduct.exists_finsupp_left`,
`TensorProduct.exists_finsupp_right`, `TensorProduct.exists_finset`:
any element of `M ⊗[R] N` can be written as a finite sum of pure tensors.
See also `TensorProduct.span_tmul_eq_top`.
- `TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_left_of_finite`,
`TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_right_of_finite`,
`TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_of_finite`:
any finite subset of `M ⊗[R] N` is contained in `M' ⊗[R] N`,
resp. `M ⊗[R] N'`, resp. `M' ⊗[R] N'`,
for some finitely generated submodules `M'` and `N'` of `M` and `N`, respectively.
- `TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_left_of_finite'`,
`TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_right_of_finite'`,
`TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_of_finite'`:
variation of the above results where `M` and `N` are already submodules.
## Tags
tensor product, finitely generated
-/
open scoped TensorProduct
open Submodule
variable {R M N : Type*}
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M] [Module R N]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Submodule R M} {N₁ N₂ : Submodule R N}
namespace TensorProduct
/-- For any element `x` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there exists a (finite) multiset `{ (m_i, n_i) }`
of `M × N`, such that `x` is equal to the sum of `m_i ⊗ₜ[R] n_i`. -/
theorem exists_multiset (x : M ⊗[R] N) :
∃ S : Multiset (M × N), x = (S.map fun i ↦ i.1 ⊗ₜ[R] i.2).sum := by
induction x with
| zero => exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
| tmul x y => exact ⟨{(x, y)}, by simp⟩
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨Sx, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨Sy, hy⟩ := hy
exact ⟨Sx + Sy, by rw [Multiset.map_add, Multiset.sum_add, hx, hy]⟩
/-- For any element `x` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there exists a finite subset `{ (m_i, n_i) }`
of `M × N` such that each `m_i` is distinct (we represent it as an element of `M →₀ N`),
such that `x` is equal to the sum of `m_i ⊗ₜ[R] n_i`. -/
theorem exists_finsupp_left (x : M ⊗[R] N) :
∃ S : M →₀ N, x = S.sum fun m n ↦ m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
induction x with
| zero => exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
| tmul x y => exact ⟨Finsupp.single x y, by simp⟩
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨Sx, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨Sy, hy⟩ := hy
use Sx + Sy
rw [hx, hy]
exact (Finsupp.sum_add_index' (by simp) TensorProduct.tmul_add).symm
/-- For any element `x` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there exists a finite subset `{ (m_i, n_i) }`
of `M × N` such that each `n_i` is distinct (we represent it as an element of `N →₀ M`),
such that `x` is equal to the sum of `m_i ⊗ₜ[R] n_i`. -/
theorem exists_finsupp_right (x : M ⊗[R] N) :
∃ S : N →₀ M, x = S.sum fun n m ↦ m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
obtain ⟨S, h⟩ := exists_finsupp_left (TensorProduct.comm R M N x)
refine ⟨S, (TensorProduct.comm R M N).injective ?_⟩
simp_rw [h, Finsupp.sum, map_sum, comm_tmul]
/-- For any element `x` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there exists a finite subset `{ (m_i, n_i) }`
of `M × N`, such that `x` is equal to the sum of `m_i ⊗ₜ[R] n_i`. -/
theorem exists_finset (x : M ⊗[R] N) :
∃ S : Finset (M × N), x = S.sum fun i ↦ i.1 ⊗ₜ[R] i.2 := by
obtain ⟨S, h⟩ := exists_finsupp_left x
use S.graph
rw [h, Finsupp.sum]
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun m ↦ ⟨m, S m⟩) Prod.fst <;> simp
/-- For a finite subset `s` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there are finitely generated
submodules `M'` and `N'` of `M` and `N`, respectively, such that `s` is contained in the image
of `M' ⊗[R] N'` in `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
theorem exists_finite_submodule_of_finite (s : Set (M ⊗[R] N)) (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ (M' : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R N), Module.Finite R M' ∧ Module.Finite R N' ∧
s ⊆ LinearMap.range (mapIncl M' N') := by
simp_rw [Module.Finite.iff_fg]
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact ⟨_, _, fg_bot, fg_bot, Set.empty_subset _⟩
| @insert a s _ _ ih =>
obtain ⟨M', N', hM', hN', h⟩ := ih
refine TensorProduct.induction_on a ?_ (fun x y ↦ ?_) fun x y hx hy ↦ ?_
· exact ⟨M', N', hM', hN', Set.insert_subset (zero_mem _) h⟩
· refine ⟨_, _, hM'.sup (fg_span_singleton x),
hN'.sup (fg_span_singleton y), Set.insert_subset ?_ fun z hz ↦ ?_⟩
· exact ⟨⟨x, mem_sup_right (mem_span_singleton_self x)⟩ ⊗ₜ
⟨y, mem_sup_right (mem_span_singleton_self y)⟩, rfl⟩
· exact range_mapIncl_mono le_sup_left le_sup_left (h hz)
· obtain ⟨M₁', N₁', hM₁', hN₁', h₁⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨M₂', N₂', hM₂', hN₂', h₂⟩ := hy
refine ⟨_, _, hM₁'.sup hM₂', hN₁'.sup hN₂', Set.insert_subset (add_mem ?_ ?_) fun z hz ↦ ?_⟩
· exact range_mapIncl_mono le_sup_left le_sup_left (h₁ (Set.mem_insert x s))
· exact range_mapIncl_mono le_sup_right le_sup_right (h₂ (Set.mem_insert y s))
· exact range_mapIncl_mono le_sup_left le_sup_left (h₁ (Set.subset_insert x s hz))
/-- For a finite subset `s` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there exists a finitely generated
submodule `M'` of `M`, such that `s` is contained in the image
of `M' ⊗[R] N` in `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
theorem exists_finite_submodule_left_of_finite (s : Set (M ⊗[R] N)) (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ M' : Submodule R M, Module.Finite R M' ∧ s ⊆ LinearMap.range (M'.subtype.rTensor N) := by
obtain ⟨M', _, hfin, _, h⟩ := exists_finite_submodule_of_finite s hs
refine ⟨M', hfin, ?_⟩
rw [mapIncl, ← LinearMap.rTensor_comp_lTensor] at h
exact h.trans (LinearMap.range_comp_le_range _ _)
/-- For a finite subset `s` of `M ⊗[R] N`, there exists a finitely generated
submodule `N'` of `N`, such that `s` is contained in the image
of `M ⊗[R] N'` in `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
theorem exists_finite_submodule_right_of_finite (s : Set (M ⊗[R] N)) (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ N' : Submodule R N, Module.Finite R N' ∧ s ⊆ LinearMap.range (N'.subtype.lTensor M) := by
obtain ⟨_, N', _, hfin, h⟩ := exists_finite_submodule_of_finite s hs
refine ⟨N', hfin, ?_⟩
rw [mapIncl, ← LinearMap.lTensor_comp_rTensor] at h
exact h.trans (LinearMap.range_comp_le_range _ _)
|
/-- Variation of `TensorProduct.exists_finite_submodule_of_finite` where `M` and `N` are
already submodules. -/
theorem exists_finite_submodule_of_finite' (s : Set (M₁ ⊗[R] N₁)) (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ (M' : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R N) (hM : M' ≤ M₁) (hN : N' ≤ N₁),
Module.Finite R M' ∧ Module.Finite R N' ∧
s ⊆ LinearMap.range (TensorProduct.map (inclusion hM) (inclusion hN)) := by
obtain ⟨M', N', _, _, h⟩ := exists_finite_submodule_of_finite s hs
have hM := map_subtype_le M₁ M'
have hN := map_subtype_le N₁ N'
refine ⟨_, _, hM, hN, .map _ _, .map _ _, ?_⟩
rw [mapIncl,
show M'.subtype = inclusion hM ∘ₗ M₁.subtype.submoduleMap M' by ext; simp,
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Finiteness.lean | 140 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
/-!
# Determinant of families of vectors
This file defines the determinant of an endomorphism, and of a family of vectors
with respect to some basis. For the determinant of a matrix, see the file
`LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant`.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `Basis.det`: the determinant of a family of vectors with respect to a basis,
as a multilinear map
* `LinearMap.det`: the determinant of an endomorphism `f : End R M` as a
multiplicative homomorphism (if `M` does not have a finite `R`-basis, the
result is `1` instead)
* `LinearEquiv.det`: the determinant of an isomorphism `f : M ≃ₗ[R] M` as a
multiplicative homomorphism (if `M` does not have a finite `R`-basis, the
result is `1` instead)
## Tags
basis, det, determinant
-/
noncomputable section
open Matrix LinearMap Submodule Set Function
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {M' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M']
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable (e : Basis ι R M)
section Conjugate
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A]
variable {m n : Type*}
/-- If `R^m` and `R^n` are linearly equivalent, then `m` and `n` are also equivalent. -/
def equivOfPiLEquivPi {R : Type*} [Finite m] [Finite n] [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R]
(e : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R) : m ≃ n :=
Basis.indexEquiv (Basis.ofEquivFun e.symm) (Pi.basisFun _ _)
namespace Matrix
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they are square matrices up to
equivalence of types. -/
def indexEquivOfInv [Nontrivial A] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n A}
{M' : Matrix n m A} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : m ≃ n :=
equivOfPiLEquivPi (toLin'OfInv hMM' hM'M)
theorem det_comm [DecidableEq n] (M N : Matrix n n A) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- If there exists a two-sided inverse `M'` for `M` (indexed differently),
then `det (N * M) = det (M * N)`. -/
theorem det_comm' [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n m A} {N : Matrix m n A}
{M' : Matrix m n A} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
nontriviality A
-- Although `m` and `n` are different a priori, we will show they have the same cardinality.
-- This turns the problem into one for square matrices, which is easy.
let e := indexEquivOfInv hMM' hM'M
rw [← det_submatrix_equiv_self e, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.refl n) _, det_comm,
submatrix_mul_equiv, Equiv.coe_refl, submatrix_id_id]
/-- If `M'` is a two-sided inverse for `M` (indexed differently), `det (M * N * M') = det N`.
See `Matrix.det_conj` and `Matrix.det_conj'` for the case when `M' = M⁻¹` or vice versa. -/
theorem det_conj_of_mul_eq_one [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n A}
{M' : Matrix n m A} {N : Matrix n n A} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) :
det (M * N * M') = det N := by
rw [← det_comm' hM'M hMM', ← Matrix.mul_assoc, hM'M, Matrix.one_mul]
end Matrix
end Conjugate
namespace LinearMap
/-! ### Determinant of a linear map -/
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Module A M]
variable {κ : Type*} [Fintype κ]
/-- The determinant of `LinearMap.toMatrix` does not depend on the choice of basis. -/
theorem det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix [DecidableEq κ] (b : Basis ι A M) (c : Basis κ A M)
(f : M →ₗ[A] M) : det (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) = det (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by
rw [← linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix c b c, ← basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix b c b,
Matrix.det_conj_of_mul_eq_one] <;>
rw [Basis.toMatrix_mul_toMatrix, Basis.toMatrix_self]
/-- The determinant of an endomorphism given a basis.
See `LinearMap.det` for a version that populates the basis non-computably.
Although the `Trunc (Basis ι A M)` parameter makes it slightly more convenient to switch bases,
there is no good way to generalize over universe parameters, so we can't fully state in `detAux`'s
type that it does not depend on the choice of basis. Instead you can use the `detAux_def''` lemma,
or avoid mentioning a basis at all using `LinearMap.det`.
-/
irreducible_def detAux : Trunc (Basis ι A M) → (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A :=
Trunc.lift
(fun b : Basis ι A M => detMonoidHom.comp (toMatrixAlgEquiv b : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* Matrix ι ι A))
fun b c => MonoidHom.ext <| det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix b c
/-- Unfold lemma for `detAux`.
See also `detAux_def''` which allows you to vary the basis.
-/
theorem detAux_def' (b : Basis ι A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.detAux (Trunc.mk b) f = Matrix.det (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
rw [detAux]
rfl
theorem detAux_def'' {ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι'] (tb : Trunc <| Basis ι A M)
(b' : Basis ι' A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.detAux tb f = Matrix.det (LinearMap.toMatrix b' b' f) := by
induction tb using Trunc.induction_on with
| h b => rw [detAux_def', det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix b b']
@[simp]
theorem detAux_id (b : Trunc <| Basis ι A M) : LinearMap.detAux b LinearMap.id = 1 :=
(LinearMap.detAux b).map_one
@[simp]
theorem detAux_comp (b : Trunc <| Basis ι A M) (f g : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.detAux b (f.comp g) = LinearMap.detAux b f * LinearMap.detAux b g :=
(LinearMap.detAux b).map_mul f g
section
open scoped Classical in
-- Discourage the elaborator from unfolding `det` and producing a huge term by marking it
-- as irreducible.
/-- The determinant of an endomorphism independent of basis.
If there is no finite basis on `M`, the result is `1` instead.
-/
protected irreducible_def det : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s A M) then LinearMap.detAux (Trunc.mk H.choose_spec.some)
else 1
open scoped Classical in
theorem coe_det [DecidableEq M] :
⇑(LinearMap.det : (M →ₗ[A] M) →* A) =
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s A M) then
LinearMap.detAux (Trunc.mk H.choose_spec.some)
else 1 := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.det_def]
split_ifs
· congr -- use the correct `DecidableEq` instance
rfl
end
-- Auxiliary lemma, the `simp` normal form goes in the other direction
-- (using `LinearMap.det_toMatrix`)
theorem det_eq_det_toMatrix_of_finset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s A M)
(f : M →ₗ[A] M) : LinearMap.det f = Matrix.det (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s A M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [LinearMap.coe_det, dif_pos, detAux_def'' _ b] <;> assumption
@[simp]
theorem det_toMatrix (b : Basis ι A M) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
Matrix.det (toMatrix b b f) = LinearMap.det f := by
haveI := Classical.decEq M
rw [det_eq_det_toMatrix_of_finset b.reindexFinsetRange,
det_toMatrix_eq_det_toMatrix b b.reindexFinsetRange]
@[simp]
theorem det_toMatrix' {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (f : (ι → A) →ₗ[A] ι → A) :
Matrix.det (LinearMap.toMatrix' f) = LinearMap.det f := by simp [← toMatrix_eq_toMatrix']
@[simp]
theorem det_toLin (b : Basis ι R M) (f : Matrix ι ι R) :
LinearMap.det (Matrix.toLin b b f) = f.det := by
rw [← LinearMap.det_toMatrix b, LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin]
@[simp]
theorem det_toLin' (f : Matrix ι ι R) : LinearMap.det (Matrix.toLin' f) = Matrix.det f := by
simp only [← toLin_eq_toLin', det_toLin]
/-- To show `P (LinearMap.det f)` it suffices to consider `P (Matrix.det (toMatrix _ _ f))` and
`P 1`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem det_cases [DecidableEq M] {P : A → Prop} (f : M →ₗ[A] M)
(hb : ∀ (s : Finset M) (b : Basis s A M), P (Matrix.det (toMatrix b b f))) (h1 : P 1) :
P (LinearMap.det f) := by
classical
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s A M) then
obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
rw [← det_toMatrix b]
exact hb s b
else
rwa [LinearMap.det_def, dif_neg H]
@[simp]
theorem det_comp (f g : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.det (f.comp g) = LinearMap.det f * LinearMap.det g :=
LinearMap.det.map_mul f g
@[simp]
theorem det_id : LinearMap.det (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[A] M) = 1 :=
LinearMap.det.map_one
/-- Multiplying a map by a scalar `c` multiplies its determinant by `c ^ dim M`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul [Module.Free A M] (c : A) (f : M →ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.det (c • f) = c ^ Module.finrank A M * LinearMap.det f := by
nontriviality A
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s A M)
· have : Module.Finite A M := by
rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨hs⟩⟩
exact Module.Finite.of_basis hs
simp only [← det_toMatrix (Module.finBasis A M), LinearEquiv.map_smul,
Fintype.card_fin, Matrix.det_smul]
· classical
have : Module.finrank A M = 0 := finrank_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis H
simp [coe_det, H, this]
theorem det_zero' {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] [Nonempty ι] (b : Basis ι A M) :
LinearMap.det (0 : M →ₗ[A] M) = 0 := by
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rwa [← det_toMatrix b, LinearEquiv.map_zero, det_zero]
/-- In a finite-dimensional vector space, the zero map has determinant `1` in dimension `0`,
and `0` otherwise. We give a formula that also works in infinite dimension, where we define
the determinant to be `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_zero [Module.Free A M] :
LinearMap.det (0 : M →ₗ[A] M) = (0 : A) ^ Module.finrank A M := by
simp only [← zero_smul A (1 : M →ₗ[A] M), det_smul, mul_one, MonoidHom.map_one]
theorem det_eq_one_of_not_module_finite (h : ¬Module.Finite R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : f.det = 1 := by
rw [LinearMap.det, dif_neg, MonoidHom.one_apply]
exact fun ⟨_, ⟨b⟩⟩ ↦ h (Module.Finite.of_basis b)
theorem det_eq_one_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) = 1 := by
have b : Basis (Fin 0) R M := Basis.empty M
rw [← f.det_toMatrix b]
exact Matrix.det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M]
[Module 𝕜 M] (h : Module.finrank 𝕜 M = 0) (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) :
LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) = 1 := by
classical
refine @LinearMap.det_cases M _ 𝕜 _ _ _ (fun t => t = 1) f ?_ rfl
intro s b
have : IsEmpty s := by
rw [← Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff]
exact (Module.finrank_eq_card_basis b).symm.trans h
exact Matrix.det_isEmpty
/-- Conjugating a linear map by a linear equiv does not change its determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_conj {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module A N] (f : M →ₗ[A] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[A] N) :
LinearMap.det ((e : M →ₗ[A] N) ∘ₗ f ∘ₗ (e.symm : N →ₗ[A] M)) = LinearMap.det f := by
classical
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s A M)
· rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [← det_toMatrix b f, ← det_toMatrix (b.map e), toMatrix_comp (b.map e) b (b.map e),
toMatrix_comp (b.map e) b b, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.det_conj_of_mul_eq_one]
· rw [← toMatrix_comp, LinearEquiv.comp_coe, e.symm_trans_self, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap,
toMatrix_id]
· rw [← toMatrix_comp, LinearEquiv.comp_coe, e.self_trans_symm, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap,
toMatrix_id]
· have H' : ¬∃ t : Finset N, Nonempty (Basis t A N) := by
contrapose! H
rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨(b.map e.symm).reindexFinsetRange⟩⟩
simp only [coe_det, H, H', MonoidHom.one_apply, dif_neg, not_false_eq_true]
/-- If a linear map is invertible, so is its determinant. -/
theorem isUnit_det {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Module A M] (f : M →ₗ[A] M) (hf : IsUnit f) :
IsUnit (LinearMap.det f) := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, f.comp g = 1 := hf.exists_right_inv
have : LinearMap.det f * LinearMap.det g = 1 := by
simp only [← LinearMap.det_comp, hg, MonoidHom.map_one]
exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ this
/-- If a linear map has determinant different from `1`, then the space is finite-dimensional. -/
theorem finiteDimensional_of_det_ne_one {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 M] (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M)
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 1) : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 M := by
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s 𝕜 M)
· rcases H with ⟨s, ⟨hs⟩⟩
exact FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis hs
· classical simp [LinearMap.coe_det, H] at hf
/-- If the determinant of a map vanishes, then the map is not onto. -/
theorem range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 M] {f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M}
(hf : LinearMap.det f = 0) : LinearMap.range f < ⊤ := by
have : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 M := by simp [f.finiteDimensional_of_det_ne_one, hf]
contrapose hf
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Classical.not_not, ← isUnit_iff_range_eq_top] at hf
exact isUnit_iff_ne_zero.1 (f.isUnit_det hf)
/-- If the determinant of a map vanishes, then the map is not injective. -/
theorem bot_lt_ker_of_det_eq_zero {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 M] {f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M}
(hf : LinearMap.det f = 0) : ⊥ < LinearMap.ker f := by
have : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 M := by simp [f.finiteDimensional_of_det_ne_one, hf]
contrapose hf
simp only [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Classical.not_not, ← isUnit_iff_ker_eq_bot] at hf
exact isUnit_iff_ne_zero.1 (f.isUnit_det hf)
/-- When the function is over the base ring, the determinant is the evaluation at `1`. -/
@[simp] lemma det_ring (f : R →ₗ[R] R) : f.det = f 1 := by
simp [← det_toMatrix (Basis.singleton Unit R)]
lemma det_mulLeft (a : R) : (mulLeft R a).det = a := by simp
lemma det_mulRight (a : R) : (mulRight R a).det = a := by simp
theorem det_prodMap [Module.Free R M] [Module.Free R M'] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M']
(f : Module.End R M) (f' : Module.End R M') :
(prodMap f f').det = f.det * f'.det := by
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M
let b' := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M'
rw [← det_toMatrix (b.prod b'), ← det_toMatrix b, ← det_toMatrix b', toMatrix_prodMap,
det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_toMatrix]
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
theorem det_pi [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] (f : ι → M →ₗ[R] M) :
(LinearMap.pi (fun i ↦ (f i).comp (LinearMap.proj i))).det = ∏ i, (f i).det := by
classical
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M
let B := (Pi.basis (fun _ : ι ↦ b)).reindex <|
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).trans (Equiv.prodComm _ _)
simp_rw [← LinearMap.det_toMatrix B, ← LinearMap.det_toMatrix b]
have : ((LinearMap.toMatrix B B) (LinearMap.pi fun i ↦ f i ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i)) =
Matrix.blockDiagonal (fun i ↦ LinearMap.toMatrix b b (f i)) := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ ⟨j₁, j₂⟩
unfold B
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply', Matrix.blockDiagonal_apply, Basis.coe_reindex,
Function.comp_apply, Basis.repr_reindex_apply, Equiv.symm_trans_apply, Equiv.prodComm_symm,
Equiv.prodComm_apply, Equiv.sigmaEquivProd_symm_apply, Prod.swap_prod_mk, Pi.basis_apply,
Pi.basis_repr, LinearMap.pi_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
LinearMap.toMatrix_apply', LinearMap.coe_proj, Function.eval, Pi.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
· simp only [map_zero, Finsupp.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
rw [this, Matrix.det_blockDiagonal]
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
/-- On a `LinearEquiv`, the domain of `LinearMap.det` can be promoted to `Rˣ`. -/
protected def det : (M ≃ₗ[R] M) →* Rˣ :=
(Units.map (LinearMap.det : (M →ₗ[R] M) →* R)).comp
(LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.generalLinearEquiv R M).symm.toMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : ↑(LinearEquiv.det f) = LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inv_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : ↑(LinearEquiv.det f)⁻¹ = LinearMap.det (f.symm : M →ₗ[R] M) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem det_refl : LinearEquiv.det (LinearEquiv.refl R M) = 1 :=
Units.ext <| LinearMap.det_id
@[simp]
theorem det_trans (f g : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
LinearEquiv.det (f.trans g) = LinearEquiv.det g * LinearEquiv.det f :=
map_mul _ g f
@[simp]
theorem det_symm (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : LinearEquiv.det f.symm = LinearEquiv.det f⁻¹ :=
map_inv _ f
/-- Conjugating a linear equiv by a linear equiv does not change its determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_conj (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
LinearEquiv.det ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = LinearEquiv.det f := by
rw [← Units.eq_iff, coe_det, coe_det, ← comp_coe, ← comp_coe, LinearMap.det_conj]
attribute [irreducible] LinearEquiv.det
end LinearEquiv
/-- The determinants of a `LinearEquiv` and its inverse multiply to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.det_mul_det_symm {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Module A M] (f : M ≃ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[A] M) * LinearMap.det (f.symm : M →ₗ[A] M) = 1 := by
simp [← LinearMap.det_comp]
/-- The determinants of a `LinearEquiv` and its inverse multiply to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.det_symm_mul_det {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Module A M] (f : M ≃ₗ[A] M) :
LinearMap.det (f.symm : M →ₗ[A] M) * LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[A] M) = 1 := by
simp [← LinearMap.det_comp]
-- Cannot be stated using `LinearMap.det` because `f` is not an endomorphism.
theorem LinearEquiv.isUnit_det (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι R M') :
IsUnit (LinearMap.toMatrix v v' f).det := by
apply isUnit_det_of_left_inverse
simpa using (LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v v' v f.symm f).symm
/-- Specialization of `LinearEquiv.isUnit_det` -/
theorem LinearEquiv.isUnit_det' {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Module A M] (f : M ≃ₗ[A] M) :
IsUnit (LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[A] M)) :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ f.det_mul_det_symm
/-- The determinant of `f.symm` is the inverse of that of `f` when `f` is a linear equiv. -/
theorem LinearEquiv.det_coe_symm {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 M] (f : M ≃ₗ[𝕜] M) :
LinearMap.det (f.symm : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) = (LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M))⁻¹ := by
field_simp [IsUnit.ne_zero f.isUnit_det']
/-- Builds a linear equivalence from a linear map whose determinant in some bases is a unit. -/
@[simps]
def LinearEquiv.ofIsUnitDet {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} {v : Basis ι R M} {v' : Basis ι R M'}
(h : IsUnit (LinearMap.toMatrix v v' f).det) : M ≃ₗ[R] M' where
toFun := f
map_add' := f.map_add
map_smul' := f.map_smul
invFun := toLin v' v (toMatrix v v' f)⁻¹
left_inv x :=
calc toLin v' v (toMatrix v v' f)⁻¹ (f x)
_ = toLin v v ((toMatrix v v' f)⁻¹ * toMatrix v v' f) x := by
rw [toLin_mul v v' v, toLin_toMatrix, LinearMap.comp_apply]
_ = x := by simp [h]
right_inv x :=
calc f (toLin v' v (toMatrix v v' f)⁻¹ x)
_ = toLin v' v' (toMatrix v v' f * (toMatrix v v' f)⁻¹) x := by
rw [toLin_mul v' v v', LinearMap.comp_apply, toLin_toMatrix v v']
_ = x := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.coe_ofIsUnitDet {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} {v : Basis ι R M} {v' : Basis ι R M'}
(h : IsUnit (LinearMap.toMatrix v v' f).det) :
(LinearEquiv.ofIsUnitDet h : M →ₗ[R] M') = f := by
ext x
rfl
/-- Builds a linear equivalence from a linear map on a finite-dimensional vector space whose
determinant is nonzero. -/
abbrev LinearMap.equivOfDetNeZero {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module 𝕜 M]
[FiniteDimensional 𝕜 M] (f : M →ₗ[𝕜] M) (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) : M ≃ₗ[𝕜] M :=
have : IsUnit (LinearMap.toMatrix (Module.finBasis 𝕜 M)
(Module.finBasis 𝕜 M) f).det := by
rw [LinearMap.det_toMatrix]
exact isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hf
LinearEquiv.ofIsUnitDet this
theorem LinearMap.associated_det_of_eq_comp (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (f f' : M →ₗ[R] M)
(h : ∀ x, f x = f' (e x)) : Associated (LinearMap.det f) (LinearMap.det f') := by
suffices Associated (LinearMap.det (f' ∘ₗ ↑e)) (LinearMap.det f') by
convert this using 2
ext x
exact h x
rw [← mul_one (LinearMap.det f'), LinearMap.det_comp]
exact Associated.mul_left _ (associated_one_iff_isUnit.mpr e.isUnit_det')
theorem LinearMap.associated_det_comp_equiv {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
(f : N →ₗ[R] M) (e e' : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
Associated (LinearMap.det (f ∘ₗ ↑e)) (LinearMap.det (f ∘ₗ ↑e')) := by
refine LinearMap.associated_det_of_eq_comp (e.trans e'.symm) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearEquiv.trans_apply,
LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The determinant of a family of vectors with respect to some basis, as an alternating
| multilinear map. -/
nonrec def Basis.det : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R where
toMultilinearMap :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun v ↦ det (e.toMatrix v))
(fun v i x y ↦ by
simp only [e.toMatrix_update, map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, det_updateCol_add])
(fun u i c x ↦ by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Determinant.lean | 491 | 497 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Independent
/-!
# Simplicial complexes
In this file, we define simplicial complexes in `𝕜`-modules. A simplicial complex is a collection
of simplices closed by inclusion (of vertices) and intersection (of underlying sets).
We model them by a downward-closed set of affine independent finite sets whose convex hulls "glue
nicely", each finite set and its convex hull corresponding respectively to the vertices and the
underlying set of a simplex.
## Main declarations
* `SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E`: A simplicial complex in the `𝕜`-module `E`.
* `SimplicialComplex.vertices`: The zero dimensional faces of a simplicial complex.
* `SimplicialComplex.facets`: The maximal faces of a simplicial complex.
## Notation
`s ∈ K` means that `s` is a face of `K`.
`K ≤ L` means that the faces of `K` are faces of `L`.
## Implementation notes
"glue nicely" usually means that the intersection of two faces (as sets in the ambient space) is a
face. Given that we store the vertices, not the faces, this would be a bit awkward to spell.
Instead, `SimplicialComplex.inter_subset_convexHull` is an equivalent condition which works on the
vertices.
## TODO
Simplicial complexes can be generalized to affine spaces once `ConvexHull` has been ported.
-/
open Finset Set
variable (𝕜 E : Type*) [Ring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
namespace Geometry
-- TODO: update to new binder order? not sure what binder order is correct for `down_closed`.
/-- A simplicial complex in a `𝕜`-module is a collection of simplices which glue nicely together.
Note that the textbook meaning of "glue nicely" is given in
`Geometry.SimplicialComplex.disjoint_or_exists_inter_eq_convexHull`. It is mostly useless, as
`Geometry.SimplicialComplex.convexHull_inter_convexHull` is enough for all purposes. -/
@[ext]
structure SimplicialComplex where
/-- the faces of this simplicial complex: currently, given by their spanning vertices -/
faces : Set (Finset E)
/-- the empty set is not a face: hence, all faces are non-empty -/
not_empty_mem : ∅ ∉ faces
/-- the vertices in each face are affine independent: this is an implementation detail -/
indep : ∀ {s}, s ∈ faces → AffineIndependent 𝕜 ((↑) : s → E)
/-- faces are downward closed: a non-empty subset of its spanning vertices spans another face -/
down_closed : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ⊆ s → t ≠ ∅ → t ∈ faces
inter_subset_convexHull : ∀ {s t}, s ∈ faces → t ∈ faces →
convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ∩ convexHull 𝕜 ↑t ⊆ convexHull 𝕜 (s ∩ t : Set E)
namespace SimplicialComplex
variable {𝕜 E}
variable {K : SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E} {s t : Finset E} {x : E}
/-- A `Finset` belongs to a `SimplicialComplex` if it's a face of it. -/
instance : Membership (Finset E) (SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E) :=
⟨fun K s => s ∈ K.faces⟩
/-- The underlying space of a simplicial complex is the union of its faces. -/
def space (K : SimplicialComplex 𝕜 E) : Set E :=
⋃ s ∈ K.faces, convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E)
-- Porting note: Expanded `∃ s ∈ K.faces` to get the type to match more closely with Lean 3
theorem mem_space_iff : x ∈ K.space ↔ ∃ s ∈ K.faces, x ∈ convexHull 𝕜 (s : Set E) := by
simp [space]
-- Porting note: Original proof was `:= subset_biUnion_of_mem hs`
theorem convexHull_subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : convexHull 𝕜 ↑s ⊆ K.space := by
convert subset_biUnion_of_mem hs
rfl
protected theorem subset_space (hs : s ∈ K.faces) : (s : Set E) ⊆ K.space :=
| (subset_convexHull 𝕜 _).trans <| convexHull_subset_space hs
theorem convexHull_inter_convexHull (hs : s ∈ K.faces) (ht : t ∈ K.faces) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/SimplicialComplex/Basic.lean | 91 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The sign of a `Real.Angle` is `0` if the angle is `0` or `π`, `1` if the angle is strictly
between `0` and `π` and `-1` is the angle is strictly between `-π` and `0`. It is defined as the
sign of the sine of the angle. -/
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_toReal {θ : Angle} (h : θ ≠ π) : SignType.sign θ.toReal = θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (ht | ht | ht)
· simp [ht, toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 ht]
· simp [sign, ht, ← sin_toReal]
· rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_pos ht,
sign_pos
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi ht ((toReal_le_pi θ).lt_of_ne (toReal_eq_pi_iff.not.2 h)))]
theorem coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} (h : 0 ≤ θ.sign) : ↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [abs_eq_self.2 (toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg.2 h), coe_toReal]
theorem neg_coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonpos {θ : Angle} (h : θ.sign ≤ 0) : -↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [SignType.nonpos_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h)
· rw [abs_of_neg (toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.2 h), coe_neg, neg_neg, coe_toReal]
· rw [sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [abs_of_pos Real.pi_pos]
theorem eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq {θ ψ : Angle} :
θ = ψ ↔ θ.sign = ψ.sign ∧ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h with ⟨hs, hr⟩
rw [abs_eq_abs] at hr
rcases hr with (hr | hr)
· exact toReal_injective hr
· by_cases h : θ = π
· rw [h, toReal_pi, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal ψ).ne hr)
· by_cases h' : ψ = π
· rw [h', toReal_pi] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal θ).ne hr.symm)
· rw [← sign_toReal h, ← sign_toReal h', hr, Left.sign_neg, SignType.neg_eq_self_iff,
_root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hs
rw [hs, toReal_zero, neg_zero, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hr
rw [hr, hs]
theorem eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : θ.sign = ψ.sign) :
θ = ψ ↔ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by simpa [h] using @eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq θ ψ
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi_div_two : (↑(π / 2) : Angle).sign = 1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, sin_pi_div_two, sign_one]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_neg_pi_div_two : (↑(-π / 2) : Angle).sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, neg_div, Real.sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two, Left.sign_neg, sign_one]
theorem sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
0 ≤ (θ : Angle).sign := by
rw [sign, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
theorem sign_neg_coe_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
(-θ : Angle).sign ≤ 0 := by
rw [sign, sign_nonpos_iff, sin_neg, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
theorem sign_two_nsmul_eq_sign_iff {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).sign = θ.sign ↔ θ = π ∨ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
by_cases hpi : θ = π; · simp [hpi]
rw [or_iff_right hpi]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· by_contra hle
rw [not_lt, le_abs, le_neg] at hle
have hpi' : θ.toReal ≠ π := by simpa using hpi
rcases hle with (hle | hle) <;> rcases hle.eq_or_lt with (heq | hlt)
· rw [← coe_toReal θ, ← heq] at h
simp at h
· rw [← sign_toReal hpi, sign_pos (pi_div_two_pos.trans hlt), ← sign_toReal,
two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi.2 hlt, _root_.sign_neg] at h
· simp at h
· rw [← mul_sub]
exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg two_pos (sub_neg.2 ((toReal_le_pi _).lt_of_ne hpi'))
· intro he
simp [he] at h
· rw [← coe_toReal θ, heq] at h
simp at h
· rw [← sign_toReal hpi, _root_.sign_neg (hlt.trans (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 pi_div_two_pos)), ←
sign_toReal] at h
swap
· intro he
| simp [he] at h
rw [← neg_div] at hlt
rw [two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi.2 hlt.le, sign_pos] at h
· simp at h
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 843 | 846 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We prove basic results about univariate polynomials.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal.map
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {p q : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S}
(hz : aeval z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.natDegree :=
natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp (algebraMap R S) hz inj
theorem degree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S} (hz : aeval z p = 0)
(inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.degree :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root hp hz inj)
end
theorem smul_modByMonic (c : R) (p : R[X]) : c • p %ₘ q = c • (p %ₘ q) := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR | hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (c • (p /ₘ q)) (c • (p %ₘ q)) hq
⟨by rw [mul_smul_comm, ← smul_add, modByMonic_add_div p hq],
(degree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq)⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
/-- `_ %ₘ q` as an `R`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def modByMonicHom (q : R[X]) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p %ₘ q
map_add' := add_modByMonic
map_smul' := smul_modByMonic
theorem mem_ker_modByMonic (hq : q.Monic) {p : R[X]} :
p ∈ LinearMap.ker (modByMonicHom q) ↔ q ∣ p :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq)
section
variable [Ring S]
theorem aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root [Algebra R S] {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.Monic) {x : S}
(hx : aeval x q = 0) : aeval x (p %ₘ q) = aeval x p := by
--`eval₂_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root` doesn't work here as it needs commutativity
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq, map_sub, map_mul, hx, zero_mul,
sub_zero]
end
end CommRing
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem trailingDegree_mul : (p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, zero_mul, trailingDegree_zero, top_add]
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mul_zero, trailingDegree_zero, add_top]
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (mul_ne_zero hp hq), natTrailingDegree_mul hp hq]
apply WithTop.coe_add
end NoZeroDivisors
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
p.rootMultiplicity t = (p.comp (X + C t)).rootMultiplicity 0 := by
classical
simp_rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, comp_X_add_C_eq_zero_iff]
congr 1
rw [C_0, sub_zero]
convert (multiplicity_map_eq <| algEquivAevalXAddC t).symm using 2
simp [C_eq_algebraMap]
/-- See `Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree'` for the special case of `t = 0`. -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
p.rootMultiplicity t = (p.comp (X + C t)).natTrailingDegree :=
rootMultiplicity_eq_rootMultiplicity.trans rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree'
section nonZeroDivisors
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
theorem Monic.mem_nonZeroDivisors {p : R[X]} (h : p.Monic) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonzeroDivisors_of_coeff_mem _ (h.coeff_natDegree ▸ one_mem R⁰)
theorem mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (h : p.leadingCoeff ∈ R⁰) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonzeroDivisors_of_coeff_mem _ h
theorem mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (h : p.trailingCoeff ∈ R⁰) : p ∈ R[X]⁰ :=
mem_nonzeroDivisors_of_coeff_mem _ h
end nonZeroDivisors
theorem natDegree_pos_of_monic_of_aeval_eq_zero [Nontrivial R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
[FaithfulSMul R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) {x : S} (hx : aeval x p = 0) :
0 < p.natDegree :=
natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root (Monic.ne_zero hp) hx
((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R S)).mp (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R S))
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow {p : R[X]} {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
(p * (X - C a) ^ n).rootMultiplicity a = p.rootMultiplicity a + n := by
have h2 := monic_X_sub_C a |>.pow n |>.mul_left_ne_zero h
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [rootMultiplicity_le_iff h2, add_assoc, add_comm n, ← add_assoc, pow_add,
dvd_cancel_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C a |>.pow n |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
exact pow_rootMultiplicity_not_dvd h a
· rw [le_rootMultiplicity_iff h2, pow_add]
exact mul_dvd_mul_right (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd p a) _
/-- The multiplicity of `a` as root of `(X - a) ^ n` is `n`. -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow [Nontrivial R] (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
rootMultiplicity a ((X - C a) ^ n) = n := by
have := rootMultiplicity_mul_X_sub_C_pow (a := a) (n := n) C.map_one_ne_zero
rwa [rootMultiplicity_C, map_one, one_mul, zero_add] at this
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self [Nontrivial R] {x : R} :
rootMultiplicity x (X - C x) = 1 :=
pow_one (X - C x) ▸ rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_pow x 1
-- Porting note: swapped instance argument order
theorem rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] [DecidableEq R] {x y : R} :
rootMultiplicity x (X - C y) = if x = y then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with hxy
· rw [hxy]
exact rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C_self
exact rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (mt root_X_sub_C.mp (Ne.symm hxy))
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul' {p q : R[X]} {x : R}
(hpq : (p /ₘ (X - C x) ^ p.rootMultiplicity x).eval x *
(q /ₘ (X - C x) ^ q.rootMultiplicity x).eval x ≠ 0) :
rootMultiplicity x (p * q) = rootMultiplicity x p + rootMultiplicity x q := by
simp_rw [eval_divByMonic_eq_trailingCoeff_comp] at hpq
simp_rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_natTrailingDegree, mul_comp, natTrailingDegree_mul' hpq]
theorem Monic.neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
((-1) ^ p.natDegree * p.comp (-X)).Monic := by
simp only [Monic]
calc
((-1) ^ p.natDegree * p.comp (-X)).leadingCoeff =
(p.comp (-X) * C ((-1) ^ p.natDegree)).leadingCoeff := by
simp [mul_comm]
_ = 1 := by
apply monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one
simp [← pow_add, hp]
variable [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_eq_degree_of_associated (h : Associated p q) : degree p = degree q := by
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h
simp [hu.symm]
theorem prime_X_sub_C (r : R) : Prime (X - C r) :=
⟨X_sub_C_ne_zero r, not_isUnit_X_sub_C r, fun _ _ => by
simp_rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot.def, eval_mul, mul_eq_zero]
exact id⟩
theorem prime_X : Prime (X : R[X]) := by
convert prime_X_sub_C (0 : R)
simp
theorem Monic.prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) (hm : Monic p) : Prime p :=
have : p = X - C (-p.coeff 0) := by simpa [hm.leadingCoeff] using eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hp1
this.symm ▸ prime_X_sub_C _
theorem irreducible_X_sub_C (r : R) : Irreducible (X - C r) :=
(prime_X_sub_C r).irreducible
theorem irreducible_X : Irreducible (X : R[X]) :=
Prime.irreducible prime_X
theorem Monic.irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) (hm : Monic p) : Irreducible p :=
(hm.prime_of_degree_eq_one hp1).irreducible
lemma aeval_ne_zero_of_isCoprime {R} [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial S] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
{p q : R[X]} (h : IsCoprime p q) (s : S) : aeval s p ≠ 0 ∨ aeval s q ≠ 0 := by
by_contra! hpq
rcases h with ⟨_, _, h⟩
apply_fun aeval s at h
simp only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hpq.left, hpq.right, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
theorem isCoprime_X_sub_C_of_isUnit_sub {R} [CommRing R] {a b : R} (h : IsUnit (a - b)) :
IsCoprime (X - C a) (X - C b) :=
⟨-C h.unit⁻¹.val, C h.unit⁻¹.val, by
rw [neg_mul_comm, ← left_distrib, neg_add_eq_sub, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, ← C_sub, ← C_mul]
rw [← C_1]
congr
exact h.val_inv_mul⟩
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem pairwise_coprime_X_sub_C {K} [Field K] {I : Type v} {s : I → K} (H : Function.Injective s) :
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : I => X - C (s i)) := fun _ _ hij =>
isCoprime_X_sub_C_of_isUnit_sub (sub_ne_zero_of_ne <| H.ne hij).isUnit
theorem rootMultiplicity_mul {p q : R[X]} {x : R} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
rootMultiplicity x (p * q) = rootMultiplicity x p + rootMultiplicity x q := by
classical
have hp : p ≠ 0 := left_ne_zero_of_mul hpq
have hq : q ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul hpq
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (p * q), if_neg hpq, rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity p,
if_neg hp, rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity q, if_neg hq,
multiplicity_mul (prime_X_sub_C x) (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C _ hpq)]
open Multiset in
theorem exists_multiset_roots [DecidableEq R] :
∀ {p : R[X]} (_ : p ≠ 0), ∃ s : Multiset R,
(Multiset.card s : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p ∧ ∀ a, s.count a = rootMultiplicity a p
| p, hp =>
haveI := Classical.propDecidable (∃ x, IsRoot p x)
if h : ∃ x, IsRoot p x then
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
have hpd : 0 < degree p := degree_pos_of_root hp hx
have hd0 : p /ₘ (X - C x) ≠ 0 := fun h => by
rw [← mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot.2 hx, h, mul_zero] at hp; exact hp rfl
have wf : degree (p /ₘ (X - C x)) < degree p :=
degree_divByMonic_lt _ (monic_X_sub_C x) hp ((degree_X_sub_C x).symm ▸ by decide)
let ⟨t, htd, htr⟩ := @exists_multiset_roots _ (p /ₘ (X - C x)) hd0
have hdeg : degree (X - C x) ≤ degree p := by
rw [degree_X_sub_C, degree_eq_natDegree hp]
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp] at hpd
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 hpd)
have hdiv0 : p /ₘ (X - C x) ≠ 0 :=
mt (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff (monic_X_sub_C x)).1 <| not_lt.2 hdeg
⟨x ::ₘ t,
calc
(card (x ::ₘ t) : WithBot ℕ) = Multiset.card t + 1 := by
congr
exact mod_cast Multiset.card_cons _ _
_ ≤ degree p := by
rw [← degree_add_divByMonic (monic_X_sub_C x) hdeg, degree_X_sub_C, add_comm]
exact add_le_add (le_refl (1 : WithBot ℕ)) htd,
by
intro a
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot.mpr hx]
rw [rootMultiplicity_mul (mul_ne_zero (X_sub_C_ne_zero x) hdiv0),
rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, ← htr a]
split_ifs with ha
· rw [ha, count_cons_self, add_comm]
· rw [count_cons_of_ne ha, zero_add]⟩
else
⟨0, (degree_eq_natDegree hp).symm ▸ WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.zero_le _), by
intro a
rw [count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_exists.mp h a)]⟩
termination_by p => natDegree p
decreasing_by {
simp_wf
apply (Nat.cast_lt (α := WithBot ℕ)).mp
simp only [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hd0] at wf
assumption}
end CommRing
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/RingDivision.lean | 729 | 730 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
| @[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 304 | 305 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Fin.consEquiv _).symm.trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, isTrivial_apply, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
lemma dZero_comp_subtype : dZero A ∘ₗ A.ρ.invariants.subtype = 0 := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ g
replace hx := hx g
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
exact hx
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.val_eq_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A =
threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show (ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A)).hom = _
have h1 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1, ModuleCat.ofHom_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_ofHom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc,
zero_comp, comp_zero, ModuleCat.hom_zero]
open ShortComplex
/-- The (exact) short complex `A.ρ.invariants ⟶ A ⟶ (G → A)`. -/
def shortComplexH0 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk _ _ (dZero_comp_subtype A)
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH1 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dZero A) (dOne A) (dOne_comp_dZero A)
/-- The short complex `Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH2 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dOne A) (dTwo A) (dTwo_comp_dOne A)
end Differentials
section Cocycles
/-- The 1-cocycles `Z¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def oneCocycles : Submodule k (G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dOne A)
/-- The 2-cocycles `Z²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)` sending
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
def twoCocycles : Submodule k (G × G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dTwo A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCocycles A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCocycles A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : oneCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCocycles A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
theorem mem_oneCocycles_def (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, A.ρ g (f h) - f (g * h) + f g = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dOne_apply, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_iff (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = A.ρ g (f h) + f g := by
simp_rw [mem_oneCocycles_def, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_one (f : oneCocycles A) : f 1 = 0 := by
have := (mem_oneCocycles_def f).1 f.2 1 1
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, mul_one, sub_self, zero_add] using this
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_inv (f : oneCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f g⁻¹) = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← oneCocycles_map_one f, ← mul_inv_cancel g,
(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹]
theorem dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles (x : A) :
dZero A x ∈ oneCocycles A :=
congr($(dOne_comp_dZero A) x)
theorem oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial [A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (g h : G) :
f (g * h) = f g + f h := by
rw [(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f h), add_comm]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
f ∘ Additive.ofMul ∈ oneCocycles A :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff _).2 fun g h => by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ofMul_mul, map_add,
oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f (Additive.ofMul h)),
add_comm (f (Additive.ofMul g))]
variable (A) in
/-- When `A : Rep k G` is a trivial representation of `G`, `Z¹(G, A)` is isomorphic to the
group homs `G → A`. -/
@[simps] def oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial [hA : A.IsTrivial] :
oneCocycles A ≃ₗ[k] Additive G →+ A where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ Additive.toMul
map_zero' := oneCocycles_map_one f
map_add' := oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial f }
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f :=
{ val := f
property := mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom f }
left_inv f := by ext; rfl
right_inv f := by ext; rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCocycles A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCocycles A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : twoCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCocycles A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
theorem mem_twoCocycles_def (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) - f (g * h, j) + f (g, h * j) - f (g, h) = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dTwo_apply, Prod.mk.eta, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_twoCocycles_iff (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) =
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j) := by
simp_rw [mem_twoCocycles_def, sub_eq_zero, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_comm,
add_comm (f (_ * _, _))]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_fst (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
have := ((mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 1 1 g).symm
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, one_mul, add_right_inj, this]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_snd (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = A.ρ g (f (1, 1)) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g 1 1
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj, this]
lemma twoCocycles_ρ_map_inv_sub_map_inv (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f (g⁻¹, g)) - f (g, g⁻¹)
= f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, twoCocycles_map_one_fst _ g]
at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
theorem dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles (x : G → A) :
dOne A x ∈ twoCocycles A :=
congr($(dTwo_comp_dOne A) x)
end Cocycles
section Coboundaries
/-- The 1-coboundaries `B¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`A → Fun(G, A)` sending `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
def oneCoboundaries : Submodule k (G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dZero A)
/-- The 2-coboundaries `B²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def twoCoboundaries : Submodule k (G × G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dOne A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCoboundaries A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCoboundaries A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : oneCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
variable (A) in
lemma oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A ≤ oneCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B¹(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z¹(G, A)`. -/
abbrev oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] oneCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles_apply (x : oneCoboundaries A) :
oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
theorem oneCoboundaries_eq_bot_of_isTrivial (A : Rep k G) [A.IsTrivial] :
oneCoboundaries A = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [oneCoboundaries, dZero_eq_zero]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_bot.2 rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCoboundaries A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCoboundaries A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : twoCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) :
f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
variable (A) in
lemma twoCoboundaries_le_twoCocycles : twoCoboundaries A ≤ twoCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B²(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z²(G, A)`. -/
abbrev twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles : twoCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] twoCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (twoCoboundaries_le_twoCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles_apply (x : twoCoboundaries A) :
twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
end Coboundaries
section IsCocycle
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) + f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsOneCocycle (f : G → A) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h + f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) + f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) + f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCocycle (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Monoid G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
theorem map_one_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, left_eq_add] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, add_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
@[scoped simp] theorem map_inv_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← map_one_of_isOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_cancel g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_sub_map_inv_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) - f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
end
end IsCocycle
section IsCoboundary
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : A` such that
`g • x - x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsOneCoboundary (f : G → A) : Prop := ∃ x : A, ∀ g : G, g • x - x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → A` such
that `g • x(h) - x(gh) + x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → A, ∀ g h : G, g • x h - x (g * h) + x g = f (g, h)
end IsCoboundary
section ofDistribMulAction
variable {k G A : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [Module k A]
[DistribMulAction G A] [SMulCommClass G k A]
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCocyclesOfIsOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isOneCocycle_of_mem_oneCocycles
(f : G → A) (hf : f ∈ oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCocycle f :=
fun _ _ => (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).1 hf _ _
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-coboundary condition, produces a 1-coboundary for the representation
on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCoboundariesOfIsOneCoboundary {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext hf.choose_spec⟩
theorem isOneCoboundary_of_mem_oneCoboundaries
(f : G → A) (hf : f ∈ oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCoboundary f := by
rcases hf with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCocyclesOfIsTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isTwoCocycle_of_mem_twoCocycles
(f : G × G → A) (hf : f ∈ twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCocycle f := (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).1 hf
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-coboundary condition, produces a 2-coboundary for the
representation on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCoboundariesOfIsTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, hf.choose,funext fun g ↦ hf.choose_spec g.1 g.2⟩
theorem isTwoCoboundary_of_mem_twoCoboundaries
(f : G × G → A) (hf : f ∈ twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCoboundary f := by
rcases hf with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
end ofDistribMulAction
/-! The next few sections, until the section `Cohomology`, are a multiplicative copy of the
previous few sections beginning with `IsCocycle`. Unfortunately `@[to_additive]` doesn't work with
scalar actions. -/
section IsMulCocycle
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) * f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCocycle (f : G → M) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h * f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) * f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) * f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCocycle (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) * f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) * f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Monoid G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
theorem map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, left_eq_mul] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, mul_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, mul_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Group G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
@[scoped simp] theorem map_inv_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = (f g)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, ← map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_cancel g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_div_map_inv_of_isMulTwoCocycle
{f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) / f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) / f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact div_eq_div_iff_mul_eq_mul.2 this.symm
end
end IsMulCocycle
section IsMulCoboundary
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : M`
such that `g • x / x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCoboundary (f : G → M) : Prop := ∃ x : M, ∀ g : G, g • x / x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → M` such
that `g • x(h) / x(gh) * x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → M, ∀ g h : G, g • x h / x (g * h) * x g = f (g, h)
end IsMulCoboundary
section ofMulDistribMulAction
variable {G M : Type} [Group G] [CommGroup M] [MulDistribMulAction G M]
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the
representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCocyclesOfIsMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨Additive.ofMul ∘ f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isMulOneCocycle_of_mem_oneCocycles
(f : G → M) (hf : f ∈ oneCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulOneCocycle (Additive.toMul ∘ f) :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).1 hf
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 1-coboundary condition, produces a
1-coboundary for the representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCoboundariesOfIsMulOneCoboundary {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext hf.choose_spec⟩
theorem isMulOneCoboundary_of_mem_oneCoboundaries
(f : G → M) (hf : f ∈ oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulOneCoboundary (M := M) (Additive.ofMul ∘ f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the
representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCocyclesOfIsMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨Additive.ofMul ∘ f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isMulTwoCocycle_of_mem_twoCocycles
(f : G × G → M) (hf : f ∈ twoCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulTwoCocycle (Additive.toMul ∘ f) :=
(mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).1 hf
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 2-coboundary condition, produces a
2-coboundary for the representation on `M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
def twoCoboundariesOfIsMulTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext fun g ↦ hf.choose_spec g.1 g.2⟩
theorem isMulTwoCoboundary_of_mem_twoCoboundaries
(f : G × G → M) (hf : f ∈ twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulTwoCoboundary (M := M) (Additive.toMul ∘ f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
| end ofMulDistribMulAction
section Cohomology
/-- We define the 0th group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H⁰(G, A)`, to be
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 695 | 699 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.HittingTime
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Doob's upcrossing estimate
Given a discrete real-valued submartingale $(f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$, denoting by $U_N(a, b)$ the
number of times $f_n$ crossed from below $a$ to above $b$ before time $N$, Doob's upcrossing
estimate (also known as Doob's inequality) states that
$$(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(f_N - a)^+].$$
Doob's upcrossing estimate is an important inequality and is central in proving the martingale
convergence theorems.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing above `b` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing below `a` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat a b f N`: is the predictable process which is 1 if `n` is
between a consecutive pair of lower and upper crossings and is 0 otherwise. Intuitively
one might think of the `upcrossingStrat` as the strategy of buying 1 share whenever the process
crosses below `a` for the first time after selling and selling 1 share whenever the process
crosses above `b` for the first time after buying.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore a b f N`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to
above `b` before time `N`.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossings a b f`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to above
`b`. This takes value in `ℝ≥0∞` and so is allowed to be `∞`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime`: `upperCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime`: `lowerCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part`: Doob's
upcrossing estimate.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part`: the inequality
obtained by taking the supremum on both sides of Doob's upcrossing estimate.
### References
We mostly follow the proof from [Kallenberg, *Foundations of modern probability*][kallenberg2021]
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
/-!
## Proof outline
In this section, we will denote by $U_N(a, b)$ the number of upcrossings of $(f_n)$ from below $a$
to above $b$ before time $N$.
To define $U_N(a, b)$, we will construct two stopping times corresponding to when $(f_n)$ crosses
below $a$ and above $b$. Namely, we define
$$
\sigma_n := \inf \{n \ge \tau_n \mid f_n \le a\} \wedge N;
$$
$$
\tau_{n + 1} := \inf \{n \ge \sigma_n \mid f_n \ge b\} \wedge N.
$$
These are `lowerCrossingTime` and `upperCrossingTime` in our formalization which are defined
using `MeasureTheory.hitting` allowing us to specify a starting and ending time.
Then, we may simply define $U_N(a, b) := \sup \{n \mid \tau_n < N\}$.
Fixing $a < b \in \mathbb{R}$, we will first prove the theorem in the special case that
$0 \le f_0$ and $a \le f_N$. In particular, we will show
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This is `MeasureTheory.integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral` in our formalization.
To prove this, we use the fact that given a non-negative, bounded, predictable process $(C_n)$
(i.e. $(C_{n + 1})$ is adapted), $(C \bullet f)_n := \sum_{k \le n} C_{k + 1}(f_{k + 1} - f_k)$ is
a submartingale if $(f_n)$ is.
Define $C_n := \sum_{k \le n} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)$. It is easy to see that
$(1 - C_n)$ is non-negative, bounded and predictable, and hence, given a submartingale $(f_n)$,
$(1 - C) \bullet f$ is also a submartingale. Thus, by the submartingale property,
$0 \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_0] \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_N]$ implying
$$
\mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N] \le \mathbb{E}[(1 \bullet f)_N] = \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0].
$$
Furthermore,
\begin{align}
(C \bullet f)_N & =
\sum_{n \le N} \sum_{k \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} \sum_{n \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\sigma_k + 1} - f_{\sigma_k} + f_{\sigma_k + 2} - f_{\sigma_k + 1}
+ \cdots + f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\tau_{k + 1} - 1})\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k})
\ge \sum_{k < U_N(a, b)} (b - a) = (b - a) U_N(a, b)
\end{align}
where the inequality follows since for all $k < U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k} \ge b - a$ while for all $k > U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} = f_{\sigma_k} = f_N$ and
$f_{\tau_{U_N(a, b) + 1}} - f_{\sigma_{U_N(a, b)}} = f_N - a \ge 0$. Hence, we have
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N]
\le \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N],
$$
as required.
To obtain the general case, we simply apply the above to $((f_n - a)^+)_n$.
-/
/-- `lowerCrossingTimeAux a f c N` is the first time `f` reached below `a` after time `c` before
time `N`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTimeAux [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (a : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ) (c N : ι) :
Ω → ι :=
hitting f (Set.Iic a) c N
/-- `upperCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
above `b` after `f` reached below `a` for the `n - 1`-th time. -/
noncomputable def upperCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) : ℕ → Ω → ι
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => fun ω =>
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω
/-- `lowerCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
below `a` after `f` reached above `b` for the `n`-th time. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ι := fun ω => hitting f (Set.Iic a) (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω
section
variable [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero : upperCrossingTime a b f N 0 = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_zero : lowerCrossingTime a b f N 0 = hitting f (Set.Iic a) ⊥ N :=
rfl
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime]
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ_eq (ω : Ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω := by
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ]
rfl
end
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem upperCrossingTime_le : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
cases n
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_le]
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ, hitting_le]
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero' : upperCrossingTime a b f ⊥ n ω = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 upperCrossingTime_le
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le ω]
theorem upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, le_hitting upperCrossingTime_le ω]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ]
exact le_hitting lowerCrossingTime_le ω
theorem lowerCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
theorem upperCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} {N : ℕ} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≠ N) :
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω ≤ a := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 lowerCrossingTime_le⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
b ≤ stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 (hitting_le _)⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_lowerCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans ?_ (stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime hn)
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
theorem lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans (stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime hn) ?_
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_succ (hab : a < b) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime hab hn)
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (lowerCrossingTime_mono hnm))
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (upperCrossingTime_mono hnm))
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
lowerCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le hn)
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
upperCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le hn)
-- `upperCrossingTime_bound_eq` provides an explicit bound
theorem exists_upperCrossingTime_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
∃ n, upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
by_contra h; push_neg at h
have : StrictMono fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω :=
strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab (h _)
obtain ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, hk⟩ :
∃ (m : _) (_ : m ∈ Set.range fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω), N < m :=
⟨upperCrossingTime a b f N (N + 1) ω, ⟨N + 1, rfl⟩,
lt_of_lt_of_le N.lt_succ_self (StrictMono.id_le this (N + 1))⟩
exact not_le.2 hk upperCrossingTime_le
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove (hab : a < b) :
BddAbove {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N} := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab
refine ⟨k, fun n (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) => ?_⟩
by_contra hn'
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_stabilize (not_le.1 hn').le hk)
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty (hN : 0 < N) :
{n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty :=
⟨0, hN⟩
theorem upperCrossingTime_bound_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N N ω = N := by
by_cases hN' : N < Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)
· refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le ?_
have hmono : StrictMonoOn (fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω)
(Set.Iic (Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)).pred) := by
refine strictMonoOn_Iic_of_lt_succ fun m hm => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab ?_
rw [Nat.lt_pred_iff] at hm
convert Nat.find_min _ hm
convert StrictMonoOn.Iic_id_le hmono N (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hN')
· rw [not_lt] at hN'
exact upperCrossingTime_stabilize hN' (Nat.find_spec (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab))
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le (hab : a < b) (hn : N ≤ n) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le
(le_trans (upperCrossingTime_bound_eq f N ω hab).symm.le (upperCrossingTime_mono hn))
variable {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0}
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_crossing (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) ∧
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) := by
induction' n with k ih
· refine ⟨isStoppingTime_const _ 0, ?_⟩
simp [hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Iic]
· obtain ⟨_, ih₂⟩ := ih
have : IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) := by
intro n
simp_rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime ih₂ (fun _ => lowerCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Ici hf _
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
intro n
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime this (fun _ => upperCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Iic hf _
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.1
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.2
/-- `upcrossingStrat a b f N n` is 1 if `n` is between a consecutive pair of lower and upper
crossings and is 0 otherwise. `upcrossingStrat` is shifted by one index so that it is adapted
rather than predictable. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingStrat (a b : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N,
(Set.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)).indicator 1 n
theorem upcrossingStrat_nonneg : 0 ≤ upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω :=
Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => Set.indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
theorem upcrossingStrat_le_one : upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω ≤ 1 := by
rw [upcrossingStrat, ← Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply]
· exact Set.indicator_le_self' (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
intro i _ j _ hij
simp only [Set.Ico_disjoint_Ico]
obtain hij' | hij' := lt_or_gt_of_ne hij
· rw [min_eq_left (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_right (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at hij'
rw [min_eq_right (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_left (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
theorem Adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
Adapted ℱ (upcrossingStrat a b f N) := by
intro n
change StronglyMeasurable[ℱ n] fun ω =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, ({n | lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω ≤ n} ∩
{n | n < upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω}).indicator 1 n
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun i _ =>
stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ((hf.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime n).inter ?_)
simp_rw [← not_le]
exact (hf.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime n).compl
theorem Submartingale.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ :=
hf.sum_mul_sub hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (fun _ _ => upcrossingStrat_le_one) fun _ _ =>
upcrossingStrat_nonneg
theorem Submartingale.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ := by
refine hf.sum_mul_sub (fun n => (adapted_const ℱ 1 n).sub (hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted n))
(?_ : ∀ n ω, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N n) ω ≤ 1) ?_
· exact fun n ω => sub_le_self _ upcrossingStrat_nonneg
· intro n ω
simp [upcrossingStrat_le_one]
theorem Submartingale.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] ≤ μ[f n] - μ[f 0] := by
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) ≤
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
have := (hf.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).setIntegral_le (zero_le n) MeasurableSet.univ
rw [setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_univ] at this
refine le_trans ?_ this
simp only [Finset.range_zero, Finset.sum_empty, integral_zero', le_refl]
have h₂ : μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] =
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (f (k + 1) - f k)] -
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
simp only [sub_mul, one_mul, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_apply,
Pi.mul_apply]
refine integral_sub (Integrable.sub (integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)
(integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)) ?_
convert (hf.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).integrable n using 1
ext; simp
rw [h₂, sub_nonneg] at h₁
refine le_trans h₁ ?_
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_sub, integral_sub' (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _), le_refl]
/-- The number of upcrossings (strictly) before time `N`. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingsBefore [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (ω : Ω) : ℕ :=
sSup {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_bot [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω} : upcrossingsBefore a b f ⊥ ω = ⊥ := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 ω = 0 := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero' : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 = 0 := by
ext ω; exact upcrossingsBefore_zero
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n ≤ upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
haveI : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
(upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN).csSup_mem
((OrderBot.bddBelow _).finite_of_bddAbove (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab))
lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono hn) this
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt (hab : a < b)
(hn : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < n) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (not_lt.1 ?_)
convert not_mem_of_csSup_lt hn (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) using 1
theorem upcrossingsBefore_le (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤ N := by
by_cases hN : N = 0
· subst hN
rw [upcrossingsBefore_zero]
· refine csSup_le ⟨0, zero_lt_iff.2 hN⟩ fun n (hn : _ < N) => ?_
by_contra hnN
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le hab (not_le.1 hnN).le)
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have h' : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime h
induction' n with k ih
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, bot_eq_zero', eq_self_iff_true,
lowerCrossingTime_zero, true_and, eq_comm]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
· specialize ih (lt_of_le_of_lt (lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h')
have : upperCrossingTime a b f M k.succ ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N k.succ ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h'
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h'
rw [eq_comm, ih.2]
exact hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, eq_comm, this, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl] at h
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M (n + 1) ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have := (crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt hNM
(lt_of_le_of_lt lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ h)).2
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, eq_comm, this]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
cases n
· simp
· exact (crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt hNM h).1
theorem upcrossingsBefore_mono (hab : a < b) : Monotone fun N ω => upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω := by
intro N M hNM ω
simp only [upcrossingsBefore]
by_cases hemp : {n : ℕ | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty
· refine csSup_le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) hemp fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt hNM hn]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hn hNM
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hemp
simp [hemp, csSup_empty, bot_eq_zero', zero_le']
theorem upcrossingsBefore_lt_of_exists_upcrossing (hab : a < b) {N₁ N₂ : ℕ} (hN₁ : N ≤ N₁)
(hN₁' : f N₁ ω < a) (hN₂ : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hN₂' : b < f N₂ ω) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < upcrossingsBefore a b f (N₂ + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self _) (le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) ?_)
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl]
refine ⟨N₂, ⟨?_, Nat.lt_succ_self _⟩, hN₂'.le⟩
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
refine ⟨N₁, ⟨le_trans ?_ hN₁, hN₂⟩, hN₁'.le⟩
by_cases hN : 0 < N
· have : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
Nat.sSup_mem (upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN) (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab)
rw [upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt (hN₁.trans (hN₂.trans <| Nat.le_succ _))
this]
exact this.le
· rw [not_lt, Nat.le_zero] at hN
rw [hN, upcrossingsBefore_zero, upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_zero']
theorem lowerCrossingTime_lt_of_lt_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n < upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
lt_of_le_of_lt lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
(upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore hN hab hn)
theorem le_sub_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n < upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) :
b - a ≤ stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω :=
sub_le_sub
(stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore hN hab hn).ne)
(stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (lowerCrossingTime_lt_of_lt_upcrossingsBefore hN hab hn).ne)
theorem sub_eq_zero_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt (hab : a < b) (hn : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < n) :
stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω = 0 := by
have : N ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
rw [upcrossingsBefore] at hn
rw [← not_lt]
exact fun h => not_le.2 hn (le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) h)
simp [stoppedValue, upperCrossingTime_stabilize' (Nat.le_succ n) this,
lowerCrossingTime_stabilize' le_rfl (le_trans this upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime)]
theorem mul_upcrossingsBefore_le (hf : a ≤ f N ω) (hab : a < b) :
(b - a) * upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, upcrossingStrat a b f N k ω * (f (k + 1) - f k) ω := by
classical
by_cases hN : N = 0
· simp [hN]
simp_rw [upcrossingStrat, Finset.sum_mul, ←
Set.indicator_mul_left _ _ (fun x ↦ (f (x + 1) - f x) ω), Pi.one_apply, Pi.sub_apply, one_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
have h₁ : ∀ k, ∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, (Set.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω)
(upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)).indicator (fun m => f (m + 1) ω - f m ω) n =
stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω := by
intro k
rw [Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter, (_ : Finset.filter (fun i => i ∈ Set.Ico
(lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)) (Finset.range N) =
Finset.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)),
Finset.sum_Ico_eq_add_neg _ lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ,
Finset.sum_range_sub fun n => f n ω, Finset.sum_range_sub fun n => f n ω, neg_sub,
sub_add_sub_cancel]
· rfl
· ext i
simp only [Set.mem_Ico, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_Ico,
and_iff_right_iff_imp, and_imp]
exact fun _ h => lt_of_lt_of_le h upperCrossingTime_le
simp_rw [h₁]
have h₂ : ∑ _k ∈ Finset.range (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω), (b - a) ≤
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, (stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω) := by
calc
∑ _k ∈ Finset.range (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω), (b - a) ≤
∑ k ∈ Finset.range (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω),
(stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω) := by
refine Finset.sum_le_sum fun i hi =>
le_sub_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (zero_lt_iff.2 hN) hab ?_
rwa [Finset.mem_range] at hi
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, (stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω) := by
refine Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
(Finset.range_subset.2 (upcrossingsBefore_le f ω hab)) fun i _ hi => ?_
by_cases hi' : i = upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω
· subst hi'
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt hab (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
by_cases heq : lowerCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω = N
· rw [heq, sub_self]
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact le_trans (stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime heq) hf
· rw [sub_eq_zero_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt hab]
rw [Finset.mem_range, not_lt] at hi
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hi (Ne.symm hi')
refine le_trans ?_ h₂
rw [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
theorem integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hfN : ∀ ω, a ≤ f N ω) (hfzero : 0 ≤ f 0) (hab : a < b) :
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ μ[f N] :=
calc
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
rw [← integral_const_mul]
refine integral_mono_of_nonneg ?_ ((hf.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).integrable N) ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun ω => mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hab.le) (Nat.cast_nonneg _)
· filter_upwards with ω
simpa using mul_upcrossingsBefore_le (hfN ω) hab
_ ≤ μ[f N] - μ[f 0] := hf.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le
_ ≤ μ[f N] := (sub_le_self_iff _).2 (integral_nonneg hfzero)
theorem crossing_pos_eq (hab : a < b) :
upperCrossingTime 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N n = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ∧
lowerCrossingTime 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N n = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n := by
have hab' : 0 < b - a := sub_pos.2 hab
have hf : ∀ ω i, b - a ≤ (f i ω - a)⁺ ↔ b ≤ f i ω := by
intro i ω
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rwa [← sub_le_sub_iff_right a, ←
posPart_eq_of_posPart_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le hab' h)]
· rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right a] at h
rwa [posPart_eq_self.2 (le_trans hab'.le h)]
have hf' (ω i) : (f i ω - a)⁺ ≤ 0 ↔ f i ω ≤ a := by rw [posPart_nonpos, sub_nonpos]
induction' n with k ih
· refine ⟨rfl, ?_⟩
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [lowerCrossingTime_zero, hitting,
Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Iic]
ext ω
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
· simp_rw [hf']
· simp_rw [Set.mem_Iic, ← hf' _ _] at h₂
exact False.elim (h₂ h₁)
· simp_rw [Set.mem_Iic, hf' _ _] at h₁
exact False.elim (h₁ h₂)
· rfl
· have : upperCrossingTime 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N (k + 1) =
upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) := by
ext ω
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, ← ih.2, hitting, Set.mem_Ici, tsub_le_iff_right]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
· simp_rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, hf ω]
· refine False.elim (h₂ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Ici, not_true_eq_false]
· refine False.elim (h₁ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Ici]
· rfl
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
ext ω
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, this, hitting, Set.mem_Iic]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
· simp_rw [hf' ω]
· refine False.elim (h₂ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Iic, not_true_eq_false]
· refine False.elim (h₁ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Iic]
· rfl
theorem upcrossingsBefore_pos_eq (hab : a < b) :
upcrossingsBefore 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N ω = upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω := by
simp_rw [upcrossingsBefore, (crossing_pos_eq hab).1]
theorem mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part_aux [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hab : a < b) :
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ μ[fun ω => (f N ω - a)⁺] := by
refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_)
(integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral (hf.sub_martingale (martingale_const _ _ _)).pos
(fun ω => posPart_nonneg _)
(fun ω => posPart_nonneg _) (sub_pos.2 hab))
simp_rw [sub_zero, ← upcrossingsBefore_pos_eq hab]
rfl
/-- **Doob's upcrossing estimate**: given a real valued discrete submartingale `f` and real
values `a` and `b`, we have `(b - a) * 𝔼[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ 𝔼[(f N - a)⁺]` where
`upcrossingsBefore a b f N` is the number of times the process `f` crossed from below `a` to above
`b` before the time `N`. -/
theorem Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(a b : ℝ) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (N : ℕ) :
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ μ[fun ω => (f N ω - a)⁺] := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· exact mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part_aux hf hab
· rw [not_lt, ← sub_nonpos] at hab
exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hab (by positivity))
(integral_nonneg fun ω => posPart_nonneg _)
/-!
### Variant of the upcrossing estimate
Now, we would like to prove a variant of the upcrossing estimate obtained by taking the supremum
over $N$ of the original upcrossing estimate. Namely, we want the inequality
$$
(b - a) \sup_N \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \sup_N \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This inequality is central for the martingale convergence theorem as it provides a uniform bound
for the upcrossings.
We note that on top of taking the supremum on both sides of the inequality, we had also used
the monotone convergence theorem on the left hand side to take the supremum outside of the
integral. To do this, we need to make sure $U_N(a, b)$ is measurable and integrable. Integrability
is easy to check as $U_N(a, b) ≤ N$ and so it suffices to show measurability. Indeed, by
noting that
$$
U_N(a, b) = \sum_{i = 1}^N \mathbf{1}_{\{U_N(a, b) < N\}}
$$
$U_N(a, b)$ is measurable as $\{U_N(a, b) < N\}$ is a measurable set since $U_N(a, b)$ is a
stopping time.
-/
theorem upcrossingsBefore_eq_sum (hab : a < b) : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω =
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico 1 (N + 1), {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.indicator 1 i := by
by_cases hN : N = 0
· simp [hN]
rw [← Finset.sum_Ico_consecutive _ (Nat.succ_le_succ zero_le')
(Nat.succ_le_succ (upcrossingsBefore_le f ω hab))]
have h₁ : ∀ k ∈ Finset.Ico 1 (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω + 1),
{n : ℕ | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.indicator 1 k = 1 := by
rintro k hk
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hk
rw [Set.indicator_of_mem]
· rfl
· exact upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (zero_lt_iff.2 hN) hab
(Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 hk.2)
have h₂ : ∀ k ∈ Finset.Ico (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω + 1) (N + 1),
{n : ℕ | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.indicator 1 k = 0 := by
rintro k hk
rw [Finset.mem_Ico, Nat.succ_le_iff] at hk
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
exact (upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt hab hk.1).symm.le
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl h₁, Finset.sum_congr rfl h₂, Finset.sum_const, Finset.sum_const,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, Nat.card_Ico, Nat.add_succ_sub_one,
add_zero, add_zero]
theorem Adapted.measurable_upcrossingsBefore (hf : Adapted ℱ f) (hab : a < b) :
Measurable (upcrossingsBefore a b f N) := by
have : upcrossingsBefore a b f N = fun ω =>
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico 1 (N + 1), {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.indicator 1 i := by
ext ω
exact upcrossingsBefore_eq_sum hab
rw [this]
exact Finset.measurable_sum _ fun i _ => Measurable.indicator measurable_const <|
ℱ.le N _ (hf.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred N)
theorem Adapted.integrable_upcrossingsBefore [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Adapted ℱ f) (hab : a < b) :
Integrable (fun ω => (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω : ℝ)) μ :=
haveI : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ‖(upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω : ℝ)‖ ≤ N := by
filter_upwards with ω
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, Nat.abs_cast, Nat.cast_le]
exact upcrossingsBefore_le _ _ hab
⟨Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable (measurable_from_top.comp (hf.measurable_upcrossingsBefore hab)),
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded this⟩
/-- The number of upcrossings of a realization of a stochastic process (`upcrossings` takes value
in `ℝ≥0∞` and so is allowed to be `∞`). -/
noncomputable def upcrossings [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(ω : Ω) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ N, (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω : ℝ≥0∞)
theorem Adapted.measurable_upcrossings (hf : Adapted ℱ f) (hab : a < b) :
Measurable (upcrossings a b f) :=
.iSup fun _ => measurable_from_top.comp (hf.measurable_upcrossingsBefore hab)
theorem upcrossings_lt_top_iff :
upcrossings a b f ω < ∞ ↔ ∃ k, ∀ N, upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤ k := by
have : upcrossings a b f ω < ∞ ↔ ∃ k : ℝ≥0, upcrossings a b f ω ≤ k := by
constructor
· intro h
lift upcrossings a b f ω to ℝ≥0 using h.ne with r hr
exact ⟨r, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
exact lt_of_le_of_lt hk ENNReal.coe_lt_top
simp_rw [this, upcrossings, iSup_le_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_nat_ge k
refine ⟨m, fun N => Nat.cast_le.1 ((hk N).trans ?_)⟩
rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
· refine ⟨k, fun N => ?_⟩
simp only [ENNReal.coe_natCast, Nat.cast_le, hk N]
/-- A variant of Doob's upcrossing estimate obtained by taking the supremum on both sides. -/
theorem Submartingale.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (a b : ℝ)
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) * ∫⁻ ω, upcrossings a b f ω ∂μ ≤
⨆ N, ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal ((f N ω - a)⁺) ∂μ := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· simp_rw [upcrossings]
have : ∀ N, ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal ((f N ω - a)⁺) ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ ω, (f N ω - a)⁺ ∂μ) := by
intro N
rw [ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· exact (hf.sub_martingale (martingale_const _ _ _)).pos.integrable _
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun ω => posPart_nonneg _
rw [lintegral_iSup']
· simp_rw [this, ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro N
rw [(by simp :
∫⁻ ω, upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ∂μ = ∫⁻ ω, ↑(upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω : ℝ≥0) ∂μ),
lintegral_coe_eq_integral, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (sub_pos.2 hab).le]
· simp_rw [NNReal.coe_natCast]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
(hf.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part a b N)).trans
(le_iSup (α := ℝ≥0∞) _ N)
· simp only [NNReal.coe_natCast, hf.adapted.integrable_upcrossingsBefore hab]
· exact fun n => measurable_from_top.comp_aemeasurable
(hf.adapted.measurable_upcrossingsBefore hab).aemeasurable
· filter_upwards with ω N M hNM
rw [Nat.cast_le]
exact upcrossingsBefore_mono hab hNM ω
· rw [not_lt, ← sub_nonpos] at hab
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hab, zero_mul]
exact zero_le _
| end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Upcrossing.lean | 815 | 822 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
/-!
# Groups with an adjoined zero element
This file describes structures that are not usually studied on their own right in mathematics,
namely a special sort of monoid: apart from a distinguished “zero element” they form a group,
or in other words, they are groups with an adjoined zero element.
Examples are:
* division rings;
* the value monoid of a multiplicative valuation;
* in particular, the non-negative real numbers.
## Main definitions
Various lemmas about `GroupWithZero` and `CommGroupWithZero`.
To reduce import dependencies, the type-classes themselves are in
`Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs`.
## Implementation details
As is usual in mathlib, we extend the inverse function to the zero element,
and require `0⁻¹ = 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
section
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → a ≠ 0 :=
mt fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 :=
mt (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)
theorem ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul h, right_ne_zero_of_mul h⟩
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_ne_zero_imp_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (h : a ≠ 0 → b = 0) : a * b = 0 := by
have : Decidable (a = 0) := Classical.propDecidable (a = 0)
exact if ha : a = 0 then by rw [ha, zero_mul] else by rw [h ha, mul_zero]
/-- To match `one_mul_eq_id`. -/
theorem zero_mul_eq_const : ((0 : M₀) * ·) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext zero_mul
/-- To match `mul_one_eq_id`. -/
theorem mul_zero_eq_const : (· * (0 : M₀)) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext mul_zero
end MulZeroClass
section Mul
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).elim id id
@[field_simps]
theorem mul_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
mt eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
end Mul
namespace NeZero
instance mul [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {x y : M₀} [NeZero x] [NeZero y] :
NeZero (x * y) :=
⟨mul_ne_zero out out⟩
end NeZero
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the only element. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a : M₀) : a = 0 := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← h, mul_zero]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the unique element.
Somewhat arbitrarily, we define the default element to be `0`.
All other elements will be provably equal to it, but not necessarily definitionally equal. -/
def uniqueOfZeroEqOne (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) : Unique M₀ where
default := 0
uniq := eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one h
/-- In a monoid with zero, zero equals one if and only if all elements of that semiring
are equal. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one : (0 : M₀) = 1 ↔ Subsingleton M₀ :=
⟨fun h => haveI := uniqueOfZeroEqOne h; inferInstance, fun h => @Subsingleton.elim _ h _ _⟩
alias ⟨subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem eq_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a b : M₀) : a = b :=
@Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) a b
/-- In a monoid with zero, either zero and one are nonequal, or zero is the only element. -/
theorem zero_ne_one_or_forall_eq_0 : (0 : M₀) ≠ 1 ∨ ∀ a : M₀, a = 0 :=
not_or_of_imp eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : b ≠ 0 :=
right_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
end
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] {a : M₀} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma zero_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ, mul_zero]
lemma zero_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (0 : M₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero]
· rw [zero_pow h]
lemma zero_pow_eq_one₀ [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [zero_pow_eq, one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff]
lemma pow_eq_zero_of_le : ∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → a ^ m = 0 → a ^ n = 0
| _, _, Nat.le.refl, ha => ha
| _, _, Nat.le.step hmn, ha => by rw [pow_succ, pow_eq_zero_of_le hmn ha, zero_mul]
lemma ne_zero_pow (hn : n ≠ 0) (ha : a ^ n ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact ha <| zero_pow hn
@[simp]
lemma zero_pow_eq_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨by rintro h rfl; simp at h, zero_pow⟩
lemma pow_mul_eq_zero_of_le {a b : M₀} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(h : a ^ m * b = 0) : a ^ n * b = 0 := by
rw [show n = n - m + m by omega, pow_add, mul_assoc, h]
simp
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
lemma pow_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, a ^ n = 0 → a = 0
| 0, ha => by simpa using congr_arg (a * ·) ha
| n + 1, ha => by rw [pow_succ, mul_eq_zero] at ha; exact ha.elim pow_eq_zero id
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨pow_eq_zero, by rintro rfl; exact zero_pow hn⟩
lemma pow_ne_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := (pow_eq_zero_iff hn).not
@[field_simps]
lemma pow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 := mt pow_eq_zero h
instance NeZero.pow [NeZero a] : NeZero (a ^ n) := ⟨pow_ne_zero n NeZero.out⟩
lemma sq_eq_zero_iff : a ^ 2 = 0 ↔ a = 0 := pow_eq_zero_iff two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff' [Nontrivial M₀] : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_right_inv_of_exists_left_inv {α} [MonoidWithZero α]
(h : ∀ a : α, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : α, b * a = 1) {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ b : α, a * b = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ := subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· exact ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h a ha
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h b (left_ne_zero_of_mul <| hb.trans_ne one_ne_zero)
refine ⟨b, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← one_mul (a * b), ← hc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc b, hb, one_mul, hc]
end MonoidWithZero
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) CancelMonoidWithZero.to_noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors M₀ :=
⟨fun ab0 => or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ha => mul_left_cancel₀ ha <|
ab0.trans (mul_zero _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_right_iff : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b ∨ c = 0 := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> [simp only [hc, mul_zero, or_true]; simp [mul_left_inj', hc]]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_left_iff : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c ∨ a = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> [simp only [ha, zero_mul, or_true]; simp [mul_right_inj', ha]]
theorem mul_right_eq_self₀ : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 :=
calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 := mul_eq_mul_left_iff
theorem mul_left_eq_self₀ : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 :=
calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 := mul_eq_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_left₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_right_inj' ha, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_right₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_left_inj' hb, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_mul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_left₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_right₀ hb]
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by right multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : a * b = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_left_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (mul_one a).symm
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by left multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : b * a = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_right_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (one_mul a).symm
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b x : G₀}
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_right_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => x * y := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul] using congr_arg (fun y => x⁻¹ * y) w
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_left_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => y * x := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one] using congr_arg (fun y => y * x⁻¹) w
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right₀ (h : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
calc
a * b⁻¹ * b = a * (b⁻¹ * b) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = a := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (h : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
calc
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = a⁻¹ * a * b := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
_ = b := by simp [h]
private theorem inv_eq_of_mul (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h) b, h, mul_one]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GroupWithZero.toDivisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid G₀ :=
{ ‹GroupWithZero G₀› with
inv := Inv.inv,
inv_inv := fun a => by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp [h]
· exact left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_cancel₀ <| inv_ne_zero h) (inv_mul_cancel₀ h)
,
mul_inv_rev := fun a b => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· simp [hb]
apply inv_eq_of_mul
simp [mul_assoc, ha, hb],
inv_eq_of_mul := fun _ _ => inv_eq_of_mul }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero : CancelMonoidWithZero G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hx h => by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx y, h, inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx z],
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hy h => by
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy x, h, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy z] }
end GroupWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : G₀) : 0 / a = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : G₀) : a / 0 = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_zero, mul_zero]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then by its inverse results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_mul_inv (a : G₀) : a * a * a⁻¹ = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one]
/-- Multiplying `a` by its inverse and then by itself results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_mul_cancel (a : G₀) : a * a⁻¹ * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a⁻¹` by `a` twice results in `a` (whether or not `a`
is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_mul_self (a : G₀) : a⁻¹ * a * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then dividing by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_div_self (a : G₀) : a * a / a = a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_self_mul_inv a]
/-- Dividing `a` by itself and then multiplying by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem div_self_mul_self (a : G₀) : a / a * a = a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_mul_cancel a]
attribute [local simp] div_eq_mul_inv mul_comm mul_assoc mul_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem div_self_mul_self' (a : G₀) : a / (a * a) = a⁻¹ :=
calc
a / (a * a) = a⁻¹⁻¹ * a⁻¹ * a⁻¹ := by simp [mul_inv_rev]
_ = a⁻¹ := inv_mul_mul_self _
theorem one_div_ne_zero {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : 1 / a ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [one_div] using inv_ne_zero h
@[simp]
theorem inv_eq_zero {a : G₀} : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_inv {a : G₀} : 0 = a⁻¹ ↔ 0 = a :=
eq_comm.trans <| inv_eq_zero.trans eq_comm
/-- Dividing `a` by the result of dividing `a` by itself results in
`a` (whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem div_div_self (a : G₀) : a / (a / a) = a := by
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div]
exact mul_self_div_self a
theorem ne_zero_of_one_div_ne_zero {a : G₀} (h : 1 / a ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := fun ha : a = 0 => by
rw [ha, div_zero] at h
contradiction
theorem eq_zero_of_one_div_eq_zero {a : G₀} (h : 1 / a = 0) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byCases (fun ha => ha) fun ha => ((one_div_ne_zero ha) h).elim
theorem mul_left_surjective₀ {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : Surjective fun g => a * g := fun g =>
⟨a⁻¹ * g, by simp [← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h]⟩
theorem mul_right_surjective₀ {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : Surjective fun g => g * a := fun g =>
⟨g * a⁻¹, by simp [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ h]⟩
lemma zero_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, n ≠ 0 → (0 : G₀) ^ n = 0
| (n : ℕ), h => by rw [zpow_natCast, zero_pow]; simpa [Int.natCast_eq_zero] using h
| .negSucc n, _ => by simp
|
lemma zero_zpow_eq (n : ℤ) : (0 : G₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, zpow_zero]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Basic.lean | 399 | 402 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Bracket
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file gives lemmas about semirings, rings and domains.
This is analogous to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic`,
the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
For the definitions of semirings and rings see `Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs`.
-/
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
open Function
namespace Commute
@[simp]
theorem add_right [Distrib R] {a b c : R} : Commute a b → Commute a c → Commute a (b + c) :=
SemiconjBy.add_right
-- for some reason mathport expected `Semiring` instead of `Distrib`?
@[simp]
theorem add_left [Distrib R] {a b c : R} : Commute a c → Commute b c → Commute (a + b) c :=
SemiconjBy.add_left
-- for some reason mathport expected `Semiring` instead of `Distrib`?
/-- Representation of a difference of two squares of commuting elements as a product. -/
theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b : R} (h : Commute a b) :
a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) := by
rw [add_mul, mul_sub, mul_sub, h.eq, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq' [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b : R} (h : Commute a b) :
a * a - b * b = (a - b) * (a + b) := by
rw [mul_add, sub_mul, sub_mul, h.eq, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {a b : R}
(h : Commute a b) : a * a = b * b ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, h.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, mul_eq_zero, or_comm, sub_eq_zero,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
section
variable [Mul R] [HasDistribNeg R] {a b : R}
theorem neg_right : Commute a b → Commute a (-b) :=
SemiconjBy.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem neg_right_iff : Commute a (-b) ↔ Commute a b :=
SemiconjBy.neg_right_iff
theorem neg_left : Commute a b → Commute (-a) b :=
SemiconjBy.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem neg_left_iff : Commute (-a) b ↔ Commute a b :=
SemiconjBy.neg_left_iff
end
section
variable [MulOneClass R] [HasDistribNeg R]
theorem neg_one_right (a : R) : Commute a (-1) :=
SemiconjBy.neg_one_right a
theorem neg_one_left (a : R) : Commute (-1) a :=
SemiconjBy.neg_one_left a
end
section
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b c : R}
@[simp]
theorem sub_right : Commute a b → Commute a c → Commute a (b - c) :=
SemiconjBy.sub_right
@[simp]
theorem sub_left : Commute a c → Commute b c → Commute (a - b) c :=
SemiconjBy.sub_left
end
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {a b : R}
protected lemma sq_sub_sq (h : Commute a b) : a ^ 2 - b ^ 2 = (a + b) * (a - b) := by
rw [sq, sq, h.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
protected lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg (h : Commute a b) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, h.sq_sub_sq, mul_eq_zero, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, sub_eq_zero, or_comm]
end Ring
end Commute
section HasDistribNeg
variable (R)
variable [Monoid R] [HasDistribNeg R]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_or : ∀ n : ℕ, (-1 : R) ^ n = 1 ∨ (-1 : R) ^ n = -1
| 0 => Or.inl (pow_zero _)
| n + 1 => (neg_one_pow_eq_or n).symm.imp
(fun h ↦ by rw [pow_succ, h, neg_one_mul, neg_neg])
(fun h ↦ by rw [pow_succ, h, one_mul])
variable {R}
lemma neg_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (-a) ^ n = (-1) ^ n * a ^ n :=
neg_one_mul a ▸ (Commute.neg_one_left a).mul_pow n
lemma neg_pow' (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (-a) ^ n = a ^ n * (-1) ^ n :=
mul_neg_one a ▸ (Commute.neg_one_right a).mul_pow n
lemma neg_sq (a : R) : (-a) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 := by simp [sq]
lemma neg_one_sq : (-1 : R) ^ 2 = 1 := by simp [neg_sq, one_pow]
alias neg_pow_two := neg_sq
alias neg_one_pow_two := neg_one_sq
end HasDistribNeg
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {a : R} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma neg_one_pow_mul_eq_zero_iff : (-1) ^ n * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rcases neg_one_pow_eq_or R n with h | h <;> simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mul_neg_one_pow_eq_zero_iff : a * (-1) ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
obtain h | h := neg_one_pow_eq_or R n <;> simp [h]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two (n : ℕ) : (-1 : R) ^ n = (-1) ^ (n % 2) := by
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n 2, pow_add, pow_mul]; simp [sq]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
@[simp] lemma sq_eq_one_iff : a ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 := by
rw [← (Commute.one_right a).sq_eq_sq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, one_pow]
lemma sq_ne_one_iff : a ^ 2 ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 ∧ a ≠ -1 := sq_eq_one_iff.not.trans not_or
end Ring
/-- Representation of a difference of two squares in a commutative ring as a product. -/
theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self [NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R] (a b : R) :
a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
(Commute.all a b).mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq
theorem mul_self_sub_one [NonAssocRing R] (a : R) : a * a - 1 = (a + 1) * (a - 1) := by
rw [← (Commute.one_right a).mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, mul_one]
theorem mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff [NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {a b : R} :
a * a = b * b ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b :=
(Commute.all a b).mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff
theorem mul_self_eq_one_iff [NonAssocRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {a : R} :
a * a = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 := by
rw [← (Commute.one_right a).mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff, mul_one]
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
lemma sq_sub_sq (a b : R) : a ^ 2 - b ^ 2 = (a + b) * (a - b) := (Commute.all a b).sq_sub_sq
alias pow_two_sub_pow_two := sq_sub_sq
lemma sub_sq (a b : R) : (a - b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 - 2 * a * b + b ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_sq, neg_sq, mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
alias sub_pow_two := sub_sq
lemma sub_sq' (a b : R) : (a - b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 - 2 * a * b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_sq', neg_sq, mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma sub_sq_comm (a b : R) : (a - b) ^ 2 = (b - a) ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_sq', mul_right_comm, add_comm, sub_sq']
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] {a b : R}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Commute.lean | 200 | 200 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
section NthRoots
/-- `nthRoots n a` noncomputably returns the solutions to `x ^ n = a`. -/
def nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset R :=
roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRoots {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a x : R} : x ∈ nthRoots n a ↔ x ^ n = a := by
rw [nthRoots, mem_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a), IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_pow,
eval_X, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero (r : R) : nthRoots 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [empty_eq_zero, pow_zero, nthRoots, ← C_1, ← C_sub, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero_right {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (n : ℕ) :
nthRoots n (0 : R) = Multiset.replicate n 0 := by
rw [nthRoots, C.map_zero, sub_zero, roots_pow, roots_X, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
theorem card_nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset.card (nthRoots n a) ≤ n := by
classical exact
(if hn : n = 0 then
if h : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a = 0 then by
simp [Nat.zero_le, nthRoots, roots, h, dif_pos rfl, empty_eq_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots h)
(by
rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_sub]
exact degree_C_le))
else by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)]
rw [← degree_X_pow_sub_C (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a]
exact card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a))
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_two_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : nthRoots 2 r = 0 ↔ ¬IsSquare r := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_nthRoots (by norm_num : 0 < 2),
← not_exists, eq_comm]
/-- The multiset `nthRoots ↑n a` as a Finset. Previously `nthRootsFinset n` was defined to be
`nthRoots n (1 : R)` as a Finset. That situation can be recovered by setting `a` to be `(1 : R)` -/
def nthRootsFinset (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : Finset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a)
lemma nthRootsFinset_def (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] :
nthRootsFinset n a = Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a) := by
unfold nthRootsFinset
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRootsFinset {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (a : R) {x : R} :
x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a ↔ x ^ (n : ℕ) = a := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset_def, mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots h]
@[simp]
theorem nthRootsFinset_zero (a : R) : nthRootsFinset 0 a = ∅ := by
classical simp [nthRootsFinset_def]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[MonoidHomClass F R S] {a : R} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n (f a) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn] at hx
· rw [mem_nthRootsFinset <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn, ← map_pow, (mem_nthRootsFinset
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a).1 hx]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset_one {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[RingHomClass F R S] {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1 := by
rw [← (map_one f)]
exact map_mem_nthRootsFinset hx _
theorem mul_mem_nthRootsFinset
{η₁ η₂ : R} {a₁ a₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₁) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₂) :
η₁ * η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (a₁ * a₂) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη₁
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos] at hη₁ hη₂ ⊢
rw [mul_pow, hη₁, hη₂]
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_nthRootsFinset {η : R} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hη : η ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) :
η ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
rintro rfl
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos, zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at hη
exact ha hη.symm
theorem one_mem_nthRootsFinset (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R) := by
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset hn, one_pow]
end NthRoots
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
variable [CommRing T]
/-- Given a polynomial `p` with coefficients in a ring `T` and a `T`-algebra `S`, `aroots p S` is
the multiset of roots of `p` regarded as a polynomial over `S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, roots_C_mul]
rwa [map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
@[simp]
theorem aroots_smul_nonzero [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, aroots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).aroots S = n • p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_pow, roots_pow]
theorem aroots_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_pow, aroots_X]
theorem aroots_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(C a * X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_C_mul _ ha, aroots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n a).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, aroots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
variable (R S) in
@[simp]
theorem aroots_map (p : T[X]) [CommRing S] [Algebra T S] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
[IsScalarTower T S R] :
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).aroots R = p.aroots R := by
rw [aroots_def, aroots_def, map_map, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq T S R]
/-- The set of distinct roots of `p` in `S`.
If you have a non-separable polynomial, use `Polynomial.aroots` for the multiset
where multiple roots have the appropriate multiplicity. -/
def rootSet (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Set S :=
haveI := Classical.decEq S
(p.aroots S).toFinset
theorem rootSet_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [DecidableEq S] :
p.rootSet S = (p.aroots S).toFinset := by
rw [rootSet]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).rootSet S = ∅ := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, aroots_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.coe_empty]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_0, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_one (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (1 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_1, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_neg (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(-p).rootSet S = p.rootSet S := by
rw [rootSet, aroots_neg, rootSet]
instance rootSetFintype (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
Fintype (p.rootSet S) :=
FinsetCoe.fintype _
theorem rootSet_finite (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(p.rootSet S).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
/-- The set of roots of all polynomials of bounded degree and having coefficients in a finite set
is finite. -/
theorem bUnion_roots_finite {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [DecidableEq S]
(m : R →+* S) (d : ℕ) {U : Set R} (h : U.Finite) :
(⋃ (f : R[X]) (_ : f.natDegree ≤ d ∧ ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ U),
((f.map m).roots.toFinset.toSet : Set S)).Finite :=
Set.Finite.biUnion
(by
-- We prove that the set of polynomials under consideration is finite because its
-- image by the injective map `π` is finite
let π : R[X] → Fin (d + 1) → R := fun f i => f.coeff i
refine ((Set.Finite.pi fun _ => h).subset <| ?_).of_finite_image (?_ : Set.InjOn π _)
· exact Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun f hf i _ => hf.2 i
· refine fun x hx y hy hxy => (ext_iff_natDegree_le hx.1 hy.1).2 fun i hi => ?_
exact id congr_fun hxy ⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi⟩)
fun _ _ => Finset.finite_toSet _
theorem mem_rootSet' {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S} :
a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, Finset.mem_coe, mem_toFinset, mem_aroots']
theorem mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : S} : a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_rootSet', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
theorem mem_rootSet_of_ne {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] (hp : p ≠ 0) {a : S} : a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ aeval a p = 0 :=
mem_rootSet.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem rootSet_maps_to' {p : T[X]} {S S'} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [CommRing S']
[IsDomain S'] [Algebra T S'] (hp : p.map (algebraMap T S') = 0 → p.map (algebraMap T S) = 0)
(f : S →ₐ[T] S') : (p.rootSet S).MapsTo f (p.rootSet S') := fun x hx => by
rw [mem_rootSet'] at hx ⊢
rw [aeval_algHom, AlgHom.comp_apply, hx.2, _root_.map_zero]
exact ⟨mt hp hx.1, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S}
(h : a ∈ p.rootSet S) : p ≠ 0 := fun hf => by rwa [hf, rootSet_zero] at h
theorem aeval_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S}
| (hx : a ∈ p.rootSet S) : aeval a p = 0 :=
(mem_rootSet'.1 hx).2
theorem rootSet_mapsTo {p : T[X]} {S S'} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [CommRing S']
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 562 | 565 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.NNReal
/-!
# Limits and asymptotics of power functions at `+∞`
This file contains results about the limiting behaviour of power functions at `+∞`. For convenience
some results on asymptotics as `x → 0` (those which are not just continuity statements) are also
located here.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Topology NNReal ENNReal Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-!
## Limits at `+∞`
-/
section Limits
open Real Filter
/-- The function `x ^ y` tends to `+∞` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ y) atTop atTop := by
rw [(atTop_basis' 0).tendsto_right_iff]
intro b hb
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 0, eventually_ge_atTop (b ^ (1 / y))] with x hx₀ hx
simpa (disch := positivity) [Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos] using hx
/-- The function `x ^ (-y)` tends to `0` at `+∞` for any positive real `y`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_neg_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (-y)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
Tendsto.congr' (eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) fun _ hx => (rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) y).symm)
(tendsto_rpow_atTop hy).inv_tendsto_atTop
open Asymptotics in
lemma tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_lt_one (b : ℝ) (hb₀ : -1 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with hb|rfl|hb
case inl => -- b < 0
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos hb.le, hb.ne, ite_false]
rw [← isLittleO_const_iff (c := (1 : ℝ)) one_ne_zero, (one_mul (1 : ℝ)).symm]
refine IsLittleO.mul_isBigO ?exp ?cos
case exp =>
rw [isLittleO_const_iff one_ne_zero]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg ?_).mpr tendsto_id
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, log_neg_iff (by linarith)]
linarith
case cos =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
exact ⟨1, Eventually.of_forall fun x => by simp [Real.abs_cos_le_one]⟩
case inr.inl => -- b = 0
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (Iff.mpr pure_le_nhds_iff rfl)
rw [tendsto_pure]
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with _ hx
simp [hx]
case inr.inr => -- b > 0
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos hb]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_neg ?_).mpr tendsto_id
exact (log_neg_iff hb).mpr hb₁
lemma tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_gt_one (b : ℝ) (hb : 1 < b) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_of_pos ?_).mpr tendsto_id
exact (log_pos_iff (by positivity)).mpr <| by aesop
lemma tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_lt_one (b : ℝ) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b < 1) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot atTop := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atTop.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atTop_iff_neg <| tendsto_id (α := ℝ)).mpr ?_
exact (log_neg_iff hb₀).mpr hb₁
lemma tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_gt_one (b : ℝ) (hb : 1 < b) :
Tendsto (b ^ · : ℝ → ℝ) atBot (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [Real.rpow_def_of_pos (by positivity : 0 < b)]
refine tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| (tendsto_const_mul_atBot_iff_pos <| tendsto_id (α := ℝ)).mpr ?_
exact (log_pos_iff (by positivity)).mpr <| by aesop
/-- The function `x ^ (a / (b * x + c))` tends to `1` at `+∞`, for any real numbers `a`, `b`, and
`c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (a b c : ℝ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ (a / (b * x + c))) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
refine
Tendsto.congr' ?_
((tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one.comp
(by
simpa only [mul_zero, pow_one] using
(tendsto_const_nhds (x := a)).mul
(tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop b c 1 hb))).comp
tendsto_log_atTop)
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_Ioi, Function.comp_apply] at hx ⊢
rw [exp_log hx, ← exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx (a / (b * x + c))), log_rpow hx (a / (b * x + c))]
field_simp
/-- The function `x ^ (1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_div : Tendsto (fun x => x ^ ((1 : ℝ) / x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (1 : ℝ) _ (0 : ℝ) zero_ne_one
ring
/-- The function `x ^ (-1 / x)` tends to `1` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_neg_div : Tendsto (fun x => x ^ (-(1 : ℝ) / x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert tendsto_rpow_div_mul_add (-(1 : ℝ)) _ (0 : ℝ) zero_ne_one
ring
/-- The function `exp(x) / x ^ s` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any real number `s`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop (s : ℝ) : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => exp x / x ^ s) atTop atTop := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := archimedean_iff_nat_lt.1 Real.instArchimedean s
refine tendsto_atTop_mono' _ ?_ (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0 : ℝ), eventually_ge_atTop (1 : ℝ)] with x hx₀ hx₁
gcongr
simpa using rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx₁ hn.le
/-- The function `exp (b * x) / x ^ s` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any real `s` and `b > 0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop (s : ℝ) (b : ℝ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => exp (b * x) / x ^ s) atTop atTop := by
refine ((tendsto_rpow_atTop hb).comp (tendsto_exp_div_rpow_atTop (s / b))).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with x hx₀
simp [Real.div_rpow, (exp_pos x).le, rpow_nonneg, ← Real.rpow_mul, ← exp_mul,
mul_comm x, hb.ne', *]
/-- The function `x ^ s * exp (-b * x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any real `s` and `b > 0`. -/
theorem tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero (s : ℝ) (b : ℝ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s b hb).inv_tendsto_atTop.congr' ?_
filter_upwards with x using by simp [exp_neg, inv_div, div_eq_mul_inv _ (exp _)]
nonrec theorem NNReal.tendsto_rpow_atTop {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y) atTop atTop := by
rw [Filter.tendsto_atTop_atTop]
| intro b
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := tendsto_atTop_atTop.mp (tendsto_rpow_atTop hy) b
use c.toNNReal
intro a ha
exact mod_cast hc a (Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe.mp ha)
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Asymptotics.lean | 141 | 146 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.DenseEmbedding
/-!
# Uniform embeddings of uniform spaces.
Extension of uniform continuous functions.
-/
open Filter Function Set Uniformity Topology
section
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
{f : α → β}
/-!
### Uniform inducing maps
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is called *uniform inducing* if the uniformity filter
on `α` is the pullback of the uniformity filter on `β` under `Prod.map f f`. If `α` is a separated
space, then this implies that `f` is injective, hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformInducing (f : α → β) : Prop where
/-- The uniformity filter on the domain is the pullback of the uniformity filter on the codomain
under `Prod.map f f`. -/
comap_uniformity : comap (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 β) = 𝓤 α
lemma isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f = ‹UniformSpace α› := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformSpace.ext_iff, Filter.ext_iff]
rfl
protected alias ⟨IsUniformInducing.comap_uniformSpace, _⟩ := isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace
lemma isUniformInducing_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformContinuous, tendsto_iff_comap, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]; rfl
protected lemma Filter.HasBasis.isUniformInducing_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp [isUniformInducing_iff', h.uniformContinuous_iff h', (h'.comap _).le_basis_iff h, subset_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.mk' {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s) : IsUniformInducing f :=
⟨by simp [eq_comm, Filter.ext_iff, subset_def, h]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.id : IsUniformInducing (@id α) :=
⟨by rw [← Prod.map_def, Prod.map_id, comap_id]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) :=
⟨by rw [← hf.1, ← hg.1, comap_comap]; rfl⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hg.comp⟩
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, ← h.comap_uniformity,
Function.comp_def, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.basis_uniformity {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {ι : Sort*}
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (H : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => Prod.map f f ⁻¹' s i :=
hf.1 ▸ H.comap _
theorem IsUniformInducing.cauchy_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {F : Filter α} :
Cauchy (map f F) ↔ Cauchy F := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap, ← hf.comap_uniformity]
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hgf : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f)) : IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ hf.le_comap⟩
rw [← hgf.1, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_comp_map f f g g, ← comap_comap]
exact comap_mono hg.le_comap
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
UniformContinuous f := (isUniformInducing_iff'.1 hf).1
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuous f ↔ UniformContinuous (g ∘ f) := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuous, Tendsto]
simp only [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def]
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.isUniformInducing_comp_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
simp only [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {S : Set α}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuousOn f S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (g ∘ f) S := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuousOn, Tendsto]
rw [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, comp_def, comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.isInducing {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) : IsInducing f := by
obtain rfl := h.comap_uniformSpace
exact .induced f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsUniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias UniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
theorem IsUniformInducing.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace α'] [UniformSpace β']
| {e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : IsUniformInducing e₁) (h₂ : IsUniformInducing e₂) :
IsUniformInducing fun p : α × β => (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) :=
⟨by simp [Function.comp_def, uniformity_prod, ← h₁.1, ← h₂.1, comap_inf, comap_comap]⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformEmbedding.lean | 116 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Triangle.Basic
/-!
# Construct a tripartite graph from its triangles
This file contains the construction of a simple graph on `α ⊕ β ⊕ γ` from a list of triangles
`(a, b, c)` (with `a` in the first component, `b` in the second, `c` in the third).
We call
* `t : Finset (α × β × γ)` the set of *triangle indices* (its elements are not triangles within the
graph but instead index them).
* *explicit* a triangle of the constructed graph coming from a triangle index.
* *accidental* a triangle of the constructed graph not coming from a triangle index.
The two important properties of this construction are:
* `SimpleGraph.TripartiteFromTriangles.ExplicitDisjoint`: Whether the explicit triangles are
edge-disjoint.
* `SimpleGraph.TripartiteFromTriangles.NoAccidental`: Whether all triangles are explicit.
This construction shows up unrelatedly twice in the theory of Roth numbers:
* The lower bound of the Ruzsa-Szemerédi problem: From a set `s` in a finite abelian group `G` of
odd order, we construct a tripartite graph on `G ⊕ G ⊕ G`. The triangle indices are
`(x, x + a, x + 2 * a)` for `x` any element and `a ∈ s`. The explicit triangles are always
edge-disjoint and there is no accidental triangle if `s` is 3AP-free.
* The proof of the corners theorem from the triangle removal lemma: For a set `s` in a finite
abelian group `G`, we construct a tripartite graph on `G ⊕ G ⊕ G`, whose vertices correspond to
the horizontal, vertical and diagonal lines in `G × G`. The explicit triangles are `(h, v, d)`
where `h`, `v`, `d` are horizontal, vertical, diagonal lines that intersect in an element of `s`.
The explicit triangles are always edge-disjoint and there is no accidental triangle if `s` is
corner-free.
-/
open Finset Function Sum3
variable {α β γ 𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
{t : Finset (α × β × γ)} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c c' : γ} {x : α × β × γ}
namespace SimpleGraph
namespace TripartiteFromTriangles
/-- The underlying relation of the tripartite-from-triangles graph.
Two vertices are related iff there exists a triangle index containing them both. -/
@[mk_iff] inductive Rel (t : Finset (α × β × γ)) : α ⊕ β ⊕ γ → α ⊕ β ⊕ γ → Prop
| in₀₁ ⦃a b c⦄ : (a, b, c) ∈ t → Rel t (in₀ a) (in₁ b)
| in₁₀ ⦃a b c⦄ : (a, b, c) ∈ t → Rel t (in₁ b) (in₀ a)
| in₀₂ ⦃a b c⦄ : (a, b, c) ∈ t → Rel t (in₀ a) (in₂ c)
| in₂₀ ⦃a b c⦄ : (a, b, c) ∈ t → Rel t (in₂ c) (in₀ a)
| in₁₂ ⦃a b c⦄ : (a, b, c) ∈ t → Rel t (in₁ b) (in₂ c)
| in₂₁ ⦃a b c⦄ : (a, b, c) ∈ t → Rel t (in₂ c) (in₁ b)
open Rel
lemma rel_irrefl : ∀ x, ¬ Rel t x x := fun _x hx ↦ nomatch hx
lemma rel_symm : Symmetric (Rel t) := fun x y h ↦ by cases h <;> constructor <;> assumption
/-- The tripartite-from-triangles graph. Two vertices are related iff there exists a triangle index
containing them both. -/
def graph (t : Finset (α × β × γ)) : SimpleGraph (α ⊕ β ⊕ γ) := ⟨Rel t, rel_symm, rel_irrefl⟩
namespace Graph
@[simp] lemma not_in₀₀ : ¬ (graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₀ a') := fun h ↦ nomatch h
@[simp] lemma not_in₁₁ : ¬ (graph t).Adj (in₁ b) (in₁ b') := fun h ↦ nomatch h
@[simp] lemma not_in₂₂ : ¬ (graph t).Adj (in₂ c) (in₂ c') := fun h ↦ nomatch h
@[simp] lemma in₀₁_iff : (graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₁ b) ↔ ∃ c, (a, b, c) ∈ t :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ in₀₁ h⟩
@[simp] lemma in₁₀_iff : (graph t).Adj (in₁ b) (in₀ a) ↔ ∃ c, (a, b, c) ∈ t :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ in₁₀ h⟩
@[simp] lemma in₀₂_iff : (graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₂ c) ↔ ∃ b, (a, b, c) ∈ t :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ in₀₂ h⟩
@[simp] lemma in₂₀_iff : (graph t).Adj (in₂ c) (in₀ a) ↔ ∃ b, (a, b, c) ∈ t :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ in₂₀ h⟩
@[simp] lemma in₁₂_iff : (graph t).Adj (in₁ b) (in₂ c) ↔ ∃ a, (a, b, c) ∈ t :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ in₁₂ h⟩
@[simp] lemma in₂₁_iff : (graph t).Adj (in₂ c) (in₁ b) ↔ ∃ a, (a, b, c) ∈ t :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ in₂₁ h⟩
lemma in₀₁_iff' :
(graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₁ b) ↔ ∃ x : α × β × γ, x ∈ t ∧ x.1 = a ∧ x.2.1 = b where
mp := by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨⟨a, b, c⟩, h, rfl, rfl⟩; constructor; assumption
lemma in₁₀_iff' :
(graph t).Adj (in₁ b) (in₀ a) ↔ ∃ x : α × β × γ, x ∈ t ∧ x.2.1 = b ∧ x.1 = a where
mp := by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨⟨a, b, c⟩, h, rfl, rfl⟩; constructor; assumption
lemma in₀₂_iff' :
(graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₂ c) ↔ ∃ x : α × β × γ, x ∈ t ∧ x.1 = a ∧ x.2.2 = c where
mp := by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨⟨a, b, c⟩, h, rfl, rfl⟩; constructor; assumption
lemma in₂₀_iff' :
(graph t).Adj (in₂ c) (in₀ a) ↔ ∃ x : α × β × γ, x ∈ t ∧ x.2.2 = c ∧ x.1 = a where
mp := by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨⟨a, b, c⟩, h, rfl, rfl⟩; constructor; assumption
lemma in₁₂_iff' :
(graph t).Adj (in₁ b) (in₂ c) ↔ ∃ x : α × β × γ, x ∈ t ∧ x.2.1 = b ∧ x.2.2 = c where
mp := by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨⟨a, b, c⟩, h, rfl, rfl⟩; constructor; assumption
lemma in₂₁_iff' :
(graph t).Adj (in₂ c) (in₁ b) ↔ ∃ x : α × β × γ, x ∈ t ∧ x.2.2 = c ∧ x.2.1 = b where
mp := by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨⟨a, b, c⟩, h, rfl, rfl⟩; constructor; assumption
end Graph
open Graph
/-- Predicate on the triangle indices for the explicit triangles to be edge-disjoint. -/
class ExplicitDisjoint (t : Finset (α × β × γ)) : Prop where
inj₀ : ∀ ⦃a b c a'⦄, (a, b, c) ∈ t → (a', b, c) ∈ t → a = a'
inj₁ : ∀ ⦃a b c b'⦄, (a, b, c) ∈ t → (a, b', c) ∈ t → b = b'
inj₂ : ∀ ⦃a b c c'⦄, (a, b, c) ∈ t → (a, b, c') ∈ t → c = c'
/-- Predicate on the triangle indices for there to be no accidental triangle.
Note that we cheat a bit, since the exact translation of this informal description would have
`(a', b', c') ∈ t` as a conclusion rather than `a = a' ∨ b = b' ∨ c = c'`. Those conditions are
equivalent when the explicit triangles are edge-disjoint (which is the case we care about). -/
class NoAccidental (t : Finset (α × β × γ)) : Prop where
eq_or_eq_or_eq : ∀ ⦃a a' b b' c c'⦄, (a', b, c) ∈ t → (a, b', c) ∈ t → (a, b, c') ∈ t →
a = a' ∨ b = b' ∨ c = c'
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] [DecidableEq γ]
instance graph.instDecidableRelAdj : DecidableRel (graph t).Adj
| in₀ _a, in₀ _a' => Decidable.isFalse not_in₀₀
| in₀ _a, in₁ _b' => decidable_of_iff' _ in₀₁_iff'
| in₀ _a, in₂ _c' => decidable_of_iff' _ in₀₂_iff'
| in₁ _b, in₀ _a' => decidable_of_iff' _ in₁₀_iff'
| in₁ _b, in₁ _b' => Decidable.isFalse not_in₁₁
| in₁ _b, in₂ _b' => decidable_of_iff' _ in₁₂_iff'
| in₂ _c, in₀ _a' => decidable_of_iff' _ in₂₀_iff'
| in₂ _c, in₁ _b' => decidable_of_iff' _ in₂₁_iff'
| in₂ _c, in₂ _b' => Decidable.isFalse not_in₂₂
/-- This lemma reorders the elements of a triangle in the tripartite graph. It turns a triangle
`{x, y, z}` into a triangle `{a, b, c}` where `a : α `, `b : β`, `c : γ`. -/
lemma graph_triple ⦃x y z⦄ :
(graph t).Adj x y → (graph t).Adj x z → (graph t).Adj y z → ∃ a b c,
({in₀ a, in₁ b, in₂ c} : Finset (α ⊕ β ⊕ γ)) = {x, y, z} ∧ (graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₁ b) ∧
(graph t).Adj (in₀ a) (in₂ c) ∧ (graph t).Adj (in₁ b) (in₂ c) := by
rintro (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) (_ | _ | _) <;>
refine ⟨_, _, _, by ext; simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]; try tauto,
?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption
/-- The map that turns a triangle index into an explicit triangle. -/
@[simps] def toTriangle : α × β × γ ↪ Finset (α ⊕ β ⊕ γ) where
toFun x := {in₀ x.1, in₁ x.2.1, in₂ x.2.2}
inj' := fun ⟨a, b, c⟩ ⟨a', b', c'⟩ ↦ by simpa only [Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff, Finset.subset_iff,
mem_insert, mem_singleton, forall_eq_or_imp, forall_eq, Prod.mk_inj, or_false, false_or,
in₀, in₁, in₂, Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, reduceCtorEq] using And.left
lemma toTriangle_is3Clique (hx : x ∈ t) : (graph t).IsNClique 3 (toTriangle x) := by
simp only [toTriangle_apply, is3Clique_triple_iff, in₀₁_iff, in₀₂_iff, in₁₂_iff]
exact ⟨⟨_, hx⟩, ⟨_, hx⟩, _, hx⟩
lemma exists_mem_toTriangle {x y : α ⊕ β ⊕ γ} (hxy : (graph t).Adj x y) :
∃ z ∈ t, x ∈ toTriangle z ∧ y ∈ toTriangle z := by cases hxy <;> exact ⟨_, ‹_›, by simp⟩
nonrec lemma is3Clique_iff [NoAccidental t] {s : Finset (α ⊕ β ⊕ γ)} :
(graph t).IsNClique 3 s ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ t ∧ toTriangle x = s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [is3Clique_iff] at h
obtain ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hxz, hyz, rfl⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a, b, c, habc, hab, hac, hbc⟩ := graph_triple hxy hxz hyz
refine ⟨(a, b, c), ?_, habc⟩
obtain ⟨c', hc'⟩ := in₀₁_iff.1 hab
obtain ⟨b', hb'⟩ := in₀₂_iff.1 hac
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := in₁₂_iff.1 hbc
obtain rfl | rfl | rfl := NoAccidental.eq_or_eq_or_eq ha' hb' hc' <;> assumption
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact toTriangle_is3Clique hx
lemma toTriangle_surjOn [NoAccidental t] :
(t : Set (α × β × γ)).SurjOn toTriangle ((graph t).cliqueSet 3) := fun _ ↦ is3Clique_iff.1
variable (t)
lemma map_toTriangle_disjoint [ExplicitDisjoint t] :
(t.map toTriangle : Set (Finset (α ⊕ β ⊕ γ))).Pairwise
fun x y ↦ (x ∩ y : Set (α ⊕ β ⊕ γ)).Subsingleton := by
intro
simp only [Finset.coe_map, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Prod.exists, Ne,
forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro a b c habc rfl e x y z hxyz rfl h'
have := ne_of_apply_ne _ h'
simp only [Ne, Prod.mk_inj, not_and] at this
simp only [toTriangle_apply, in₀, in₁, in₂, Set.mem_inter_iff, mem_insert, mem_singleton,
mem_coe, and_imp, Sum.forall, or_false, forall_eq, false_or, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff,
true_and, and_true, Set.Subsingleton]
suffices ¬ (a = x ∧ b = y) ∧ ¬ (a = x ∧ c = z) ∧ ¬ (b = y ∧ c = z) by aesop
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact this rfl rfl (ExplicitDisjoint.inj₂ habc hxyz)
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact this rfl (ExplicitDisjoint.inj₁ habc hxyz) rfl
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact this (ExplicitDisjoint.inj₀ habc hxyz) rfl rfl
lemma cliqueSet_eq_image [NoAccidental t] : (graph t).cliqueSet 3 = toTriangle '' t := by
ext; exact is3Clique_iff
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β] [Fintype γ]
lemma cliqueFinset_eq_image [NoAccidental t] : (graph t).cliqueFinset 3 = t.image toTriangle :=
coe_injective <| by push_cast; exact cliqueSet_eq_image _
lemma cliqueFinset_eq_map [NoAccidental t] : (graph t).cliqueFinset 3 = t.map toTriangle := by
simp [cliqueFinset_eq_image, map_eq_image]
@[simp] lemma card_triangles [NoAccidental t] : #((graph t).cliqueFinset 3) = #t := by
rw [cliqueFinset_eq_map, card_map]
lemma farFromTriangleFree [ExplicitDisjoint t] {ε : 𝕜}
(ht : ε * ((Fintype.card α + Fintype.card β + Fintype.card γ) ^ 2 : ℕ) ≤ #t) :
(graph t).FarFromTriangleFree ε :=
farFromTriangleFree_of_disjoint_triangles (t.map toTriangle)
(map_subset_iff_subset_preimage.2 fun x hx ↦ by simpa using toTriangle_is3Clique hx)
(map_toTriangle_disjoint t) <| by simpa [add_assoc] using ht
end Fintype
end DecidableEq
variable (t)
lemma locallyLinear [ExplicitDisjoint t] [NoAccidental t] : (graph t).LocallyLinear := by
| classical
refine ⟨?_, fun x y hxy ↦ ?_⟩
· unfold EdgeDisjointTriangles
convert map_toTriangle_disjoint t
rw [cliqueSet_eq_image, coe_map]
· obtain ⟨z, hz, hxy⟩ := exists_mem_toTriangle hxy
exact ⟨_, toTriangle_is3Clique hz, hxy⟩
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Triangle/Tripartite.lean | 235 | 242 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ #σ.support :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
theorem pow_prime_eq_one_iff {σ : Perm α} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] :
σ ^ p = 1 ↔ ∀ c ∈ σ.cycleType, c = p := by
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, ← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun c ↦ ⟨fun hc h ↦ Or.resolve_left (hp.elim.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd c (hc h))
(Nat.ne_of_lt' (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType h)),
fun hc h ↦ by rw [hc h]⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : #σ.support < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cycleType_prime_order h1
rw [← σ.sum_cycleType, hn, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id,
mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ), Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero] at h2
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, hn, card_replicate, h2]
theorem cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset {f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
f.cycleType ≤ g.cycleType := by
have hf' := mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff.1 hf
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, hf'.left.cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton]
refine map_le_map ?_
simpa only [Finset.singleton_val, singleton_le, Finset.mem_val] using hf
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_mul {f g : Perm α} (h : f.Disjoint g) :
(f * g).cycleType = f.cycleType + g.cycleType := by
simp only [Perm.cycleType]
rw [h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union]
simp only [Finset.union_val, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _, Multiset.map_add]
simp only [Finset.disjoint_val, Disjoint.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j))
(hs' : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j) :=
hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute)) :
(s.noncommProd k hs').cycleType = s.sum fun i ↦ (k i).cycleType := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.sum_insert hi]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleType_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
{f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
(g * f⁻¹).cycleType = g.cycleType - f.cycleType :=
add_right_cancel (b := f.cycleType) <| by
rw [← (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf).cycleType, inv_mul_cancel_right,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf)]
theorem isConj_of_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} (h : cycleType σ = cycleType τ) : IsConj σ τ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on generalizing τ with
| base_one =>
rw [cycleType_one, eq_comm, cycleType_eq_zero] at h
rw [h]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
have hτ := card_cycleType_eq_one.2 hσ
rw [h, card_cycleType_eq_one] at hτ
apply hσ.isConj hτ
rwa [hσ.cycleType, hτ.cycleType, Multiset.singleton_inj] at h
| induction_disjoint σ π hd hc hσ hπ =>
rw [hd.cycleType] at h
have h' : #σ.support ∈ τ.cycleType := by
simp [← h, hc.cycleType]
obtain ⟨σ', hσ'l, hσ'⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp h'
have key : IsConj (σ' * τ * σ'⁻¹) τ := (isConj_iff.2 ⟨σ', rfl⟩).symm
refine IsConj.trans ?_ key
rw [mul_assoc]
have hs : σ.cycleType = σ'.cycleType := by
rw [← Finset.mem_def, mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at hσ'l
rw [hc.cycleType, ← hσ', hσ'l.left.cycleType]; rfl
refine hd.isConj_mul (hσ hs) (hπ ?_) ?_
· rw [cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub, ← h, add_comm, hs,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
rwa [Finset.mem_def]
· exact (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hσ'l).symm
theorem isConj_iff_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} : IsConj σ τ ↔ σ.cycleType = τ.cycleType :=
⟨fun h => by
obtain ⟨π, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 h
rw [cycleType_conj], isConj_of_cycleType_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_extendDomain {β : Type*} [Fintype β] [DecidableEq β] {p : β → Prop}
[DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
cycleType (g.extendDomain f) = cycleType g := by
induction g using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => rw [extendDomain_one, cycleType_one, cycleType_one]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
rw [(hσ.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ.cycleType, card_support_extend_domain]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ =>
rw [hd.cycleType, ← extendDomain_mul, (hd.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ, hτ]
theorem cycleType_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {g : Perm (Subtype p)} :
cycleType (ofSubtype g) = cycleType g :=
cycleType_extendDomain (Equiv.refl (Subtype p))
theorem mem_cycleType_iff {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} :
n ∈ cycleType σ ↔ ∃ c τ, σ = c * τ ∧ Disjoint c τ ∧ IsCycle c ∧ c.support.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨l, rfl, hlc, hld⟩ := truncCycleFactors σ
rw [cycleType_eq _ rfl hlc hld, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_map] at h
obtain ⟨c, cl, rfl⟩ := h
rw [(List.perm_cons_erase cl).pairwise_iff @(Disjoint.symmetric)] at hld
refine ⟨c, (l.erase c).prod, ?_, ?_, hlc _ cl, rfl⟩
· rw [← List.prod_cons, (List.perm_cons_erase cl).symm.prod_eq' (hld.imp Disjoint.commute)]
· exact disjoint_prod_right _ fun g => List.rel_of_pairwise_cons hld
· rintro ⟨c, t, rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩
simp [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType]
theorem le_card_support_of_mem_cycleType {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} (h : n ∈ cycleType σ) :
n ≤ #σ.support :=
(le_sum_of_mem h).trans (le_of_eq σ.sum_cycleType)
theorem cycleType_of_card_le_mem_cycleType_add_two {n : ℕ} {g : Perm α}
(hn2 : Fintype.card α < n + 2) (hng : n ∈ g.cycleType) : g.cycleType = {n} := by
obtain ⟨c, g', rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_cycleType_iff.1 hng
suffices g'1 : g' = 1 by
rw [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType, g'1, cycleType_one, add_zero]
contrapose! hn2 with g'1
apply le_trans _ (c * g').support.card_le_univ
rw [hd.card_support_mul]
exact add_le_add_left (two_le_card_support_of_ne_one g'1) _
end CycleType
theorem card_compl_support_modEq [DecidableEq α] {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] {σ : Perm α}
(hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : σ.supportᶜ.card ≡ Fintype.card α [MOD p] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd', ← Finset.card_compl, compl_compl, ← sum_cycleType]
· refine Multiset.dvd_sum fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨m, -, hm⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
obtain ⟨l, -, rfl⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
| ((congr_arg _ hm).mp (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hk))
exact dvd_pow_self _ fun h => (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hk).ne <| by rw [h, pow_zero]
· exact Finset.card_le_univ _
open Function in
/-- The number of fixed points of a `p ^ n`-th root of the identity function over a finite set
and the set's cardinality have the same residue modulo `p`, where `p` is a prime. -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 352 | 358 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
obtain ⟨b', h'⟩ := Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h))
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
theorem dlookup_map (l : List (Sigma β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (g : ∀ a, β a → β' (f a)) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, g _ x.2⟩).dlookup (f a) = (l.dlookup a).map (g a) := by
induction' l with b l IH
· rw [map_nil, dlookup_nil, dlookup_nil, Option.map_none']
· rw [map_cons]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a b.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.map_some']
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ h, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ (fun he => h <| hf he), IH]
theorem dlookup_map₁ {β : Type v} (l : List (Σ _ : α, β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, x.2⟩ : List (Σ _ : α', β)).dlookup (f a) = l.dlookup a := by
rw [dlookup_map (β' := fun _ => β) l hf (fun _ x => x) a, Option.map_id']
theorem dlookup_map₂ {γ δ : α → Type*} {l : List (Σ a, γ a)} {f : ∀ a, γ a → δ a} (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨x.1, f _ x.2⟩ : List (Σ a, δ a)).dlookup a = (l.dlookup a).map (f a) :=
dlookup_map l Function.injective_id _ _
/-! ### `lookupAll` -/
/-- `lookup_all a l` is the list of all values in `l` corresponding to the key `a`. -/
def lookupAll (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (β a)
| [] => []
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then Eq.recOn h b :: lookupAll a l else lookupAll a l
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_nil (a : α) : lookupAll a [] = @nil (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookupAll a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = b :: lookupAll a l :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookupAll a (s :: l) = lookupAll a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem lookupAll_eq_nil {a : α} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, lookupAll a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp only [lookupAll_cons_eq, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and, not_or,
false_iff, not_forall, not_and, not_not, reduceCtorEq]
use b
simp
· simp [h, lookupAll_eq_nil]
theorem head?_lookupAll (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), head? (lookupAll a l) = dlookup a l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h; simp
· rw [lookupAll_cons_ne, dlookup_cons_ne, head?_lookupAll a l] <;> assumption
theorem mem_lookupAll {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ lookupAll a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
· simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
theorem lookupAll_sublist (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (lookupAll a l).map (Sigma.mk a) <+ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp only [ne_eq, not_true, lookupAll_cons_eq, List.map]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons₂ _
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, lookupAll_cons_ne]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons _
theorem lookupAll_length_le_one (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
length (lookupAll a l) ≤ 1 := by
have := Nodup.sublist ((lookupAll_sublist a l).map _) h
rw [map_map] at this
rwa [← nodup_replicate, ← map_const]
theorem lookupAll_eq_dlookup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
lookupAll a l = (dlookup a l).toList := by
rw [← head?_lookupAll]
have h1 := lookupAll_length_le_one a h; revert h1
rcases lookupAll a l with (_ | ⟨b, _ | ⟨c, l⟩⟩) <;> intro h1 <;> try rfl
exact absurd h1 (by simp)
theorem lookupAll_nodup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) : (lookupAll a l).Nodup := by
(rw [lookupAll_eq_dlookup a h]; apply Option.toList_nodup)
theorem perm_lookupAll (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookupAll a l₁ = lookupAll a l₂ := by
simp [lookupAll_eq_dlookup, nd₁, nd₂, perm_dlookup a nd₁ nd₂ p]
theorem dlookup_append (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)) (a : α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).dlookup a = (l₁.dlookup a).or (l₂.dlookup a) := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rfl
| cons x l₁ IH =>
rw [cons_append]
obtain rfl | hb := Decidable.eq_or_ne a x.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.or]
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ hb, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ hb, IH]
/-! ### `kreplace` -/
/-- Replaces the first value with key `a` by `b`. -/
def kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
lookmap fun s => if a = s.1 then some ⟨a, b⟩ else none
theorem kreplace_of_forall_not (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)}
(H : ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l) : kreplace a b l = l :=
lookmap_of_forall_not _ <| by
rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h; dsimp; split_ifs
· subst a'
exact H _ h
· rfl
theorem kreplace_self {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) : kreplace a b l = l := by
refine (lookmap_congr ?_).trans (lookmap_id' (Option.guard fun (s : Sigma β) => a = s.1) ?_ _)
· rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h'
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· subst a'
simp [nd.eq_of_mk_mem h h']
· rfl
· rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· simp
· rintro ⟨⟩
theorem keys_kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (kreplace a b l).keys = l.keys :=
lookmap_map_eq _ _ <| by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₂⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with h <;> simp +contextual [h]
theorem kreplace_nodupKeys (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)} :
(kreplace a b l).NodupKeys ↔ l.NodupKeys := by simp [NodupKeys, keys_kreplace]
theorem Perm.kreplace {a : α} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l₁.NodupKeys) :
l₁ ~ l₂ → kreplace a b l₁ ~ kreplace a b l₂ :=
perm_lookmap _ <| by
refine nd.pairwise_ne.imp ?_
intro x y h z h₁ w h₂
split_ifs at h₁ h₂ with h_2 h_1 <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂
exact (h (h_2.symm.trans h_1)).elim
/-! ### `kerase` -/
/-- Remove the first pair with the key `a`. -/
def kerase (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
eraseP fun s => a = s.1
@[simp]
theorem kerase_nil {a} : @kerase _ β _ a [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_eq {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a = s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = l := by simp [kerase, h]
@[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_ne {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ≠ s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = s :: kerase a l := by simp [kerase, h]
@[simp]
theorem kerase_of_not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∉ l.keys) : kerase a l = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [not_or] at h; simp [h.1, ih h.2]
theorem kerase_sublist (a : α) (l : List (Sigma β)) : kerase a l <+ l :=
eraseP_sublist
theorem kerase_keys_subset (a) (l : List (Sigma β)) : (kerase a l).keys ⊆ l.keys :=
((kerase_sublist a l).map _).subset
theorem mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase {a₁ a₂} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
a₁ ∈ (kerase a₂ l).keys → a₁ ∈ l.keys :=
@kerase_keys_subset _ _ _ _ _ _
theorem exists_of_kerase {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ (b : β a) (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)),
a ∉ l₁.keys ∧ l = l₁ ++ ⟨a, b⟩ :: l₂ ∧ kerase a l = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
induction l with
| nil => cases h
| cons hd tl ih =>
by_cases e : a = hd.1
· subst e
exact ⟨hd.2, [], tl, by simp, by cases hd; rfl, by simp⟩
· simp only [keys_cons, mem_cons] at h
rcases h with h | h
· exact absurd h e
rcases ih h with ⟨b, tl₁, tl₂, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
exact ⟨b, hd :: tl₁, tl₂, not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem e h₁, by (rw [h₂]; rfl), by
simp [e, h₃]⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_keys_kerase_of_ne {a₁ a₂} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a₁ ≠ a₂) :
a₁ ∈ (kerase a₂ l).keys ↔ a₁ ∈ l.keys :=
(Iff.intro mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase) fun p =>
if q : a₂ ∈ l.keys then
match l, kerase a₂ l, exists_of_kerase q, p with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, rfl⟩, p => by simpa [keys, h] using p
else by simp [q, p]
theorem keys_kerase {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (kerase a l).keys = l.keys.erase a := by
rw [keys, kerase, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, Function.comp_def]
congr
theorem kerase_kerase {a a'} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
(kerase a' l).kerase a = (kerase a l).kerase a' := by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'; rfl
induction' l with x xs
· rfl
· by_cases a' = x.1
· subst a'
simp [kerase_cons_ne h, kerase_cons_eq rfl]
by_cases h' : a = x.1
· subst a
simp [kerase_cons_eq rfl, kerase_cons_ne (Ne.symm h)]
· simp [kerase_cons_ne, *]
theorem NodupKeys.kerase (a : α) : NodupKeys l → (kerase a l).NodupKeys :=
NodupKeys.sublist <| kerase_sublist _ _
theorem Perm.kerase {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l₁.NodupKeys) :
l₁ ~ l₂ → kerase a l₁ ~ kerase a l₂ := by
apply Perm.eraseP
apply (nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp
intros; simp_all
@[simp]
| theorem not_mem_keys_kerase (a) {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
a ∉ (kerase a l).keys := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp? at nd says simp only [nodupKeys_cons] at nd
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 456 | 461 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,637 | 2,639 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
## References
* [Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.][Hytonen_VanNeerven_Veraar_Wies_2016]
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : ℕ → α} {m : ℕ}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· simp [Set.preimage, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_cod
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_dom
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {b : β} : StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one [One β] : StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) := stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
section aux
omit [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete`. -/
private noncomputable def simpleFuncAux (f : α → β) (g : ℕ → α) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β
| 0 => .const _ (f (g 0))
| n + 1 => .piecewise {g n} (.singleton _) (.const _ <| f (g n)) (simpleFuncAux f g n)
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt : ∀ n > m, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m)
| _, .refl => by simp [simpleFuncAux]
| _, Nat.le.step (m := n) hmn => by
obtain hnm | hnm := eq_or_ne (g n) (g m) <;>
simp [simpleFuncAux, Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem , hnm.symm, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt _ hmn]
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m) :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨_, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt⟩
end aux
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete [Countable α] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
nontriviality β
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_surjective_nat α
exact ⟨simpleFuncAux f g, hg.forall.2 fun m ↦
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq⟩
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete (since := "2025-04-09")]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] : StronglyMeasurable f := .of_discrete
end StronglyMeasurable
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀ h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq, ← Finset.mem_coe]
classical
refine fun n => measure_biUnion_lt_top {y ∈ (fs n).range | y ≠ 0}.finite_toSet fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
protected theorem prodMk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prodMk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] protected alias prod_mk := StronglyMeasurable.prodMk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_right
protected theorem prod_swap {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β × α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
protected theorem fst {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_fst
protected theorem snd [mα : MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk stronglyMeasurable_const)
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Max β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Min β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : IsEmbedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : IsClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.injective.preimage_image] at this
/-- A sequential limit of strongly measurable functions is strongly measurable. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
StronglyMeasurable g := by
borelize β
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' u (fun i => (hf i).measurable) lim
· rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ i, range (f (v i)))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun i => (hf (v i)).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto ((lim x).comp hv)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
protected theorem piecewise {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
{_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (Set.piecewise s f g) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hf.tendsto_approx x
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hg.tendsto_approx x
/-- this is slightly different from `StronglyMeasurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`StronglyMeasurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact StronglyMeasurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) stronglyMeasurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_const`, but replacing `StronglyMeasurable.ite` by
`StronglyMeasurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
protected theorem ite {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {p : α → Prop}
{_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a }) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
StronglyMeasurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {g' : γ → β}
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg' : StronglyMeasurable g') :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.extend g f g') := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.extend (hf.approx n) g hg (hg'.approx n), ?_⟩
intro x
by_cases hx : ∃ y, g y = x
· rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa only [SimpleFunc.extend_apply, hg.injective, Injective.extend_apply] using
hf.tendsto_approx y
· simpa only [hx, SimpleFunc.extend_apply', not_false_iff, extend_apply'] using
hg'.tendsto_approx x
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hne : γ → Nonempty β) :
∃ f' : γ → β, StronglyMeasurable f' ∧ f' ∘ g = f :=
⟨Function.extend g f fun x => Classical.choice (hne x),
hg.stronglyMeasurable_extend hf (stronglyMeasurable_const' fun _ _ => rfl),
funext fun _ => hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : StronglyMeasurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : StronglyMeasurable fun a : t => f a) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality β; inhabit β
suffices Function.extend Subtype.val (fun x : s ↦ f x)
(Function.extend (↑) (fun x : t ↦ f x) fun _ ↦ default) = f from
this ▸ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).stronglyMeasurable_extend hc <|
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe ht).stronglyMeasurable_extend hd stronglyMeasurable_const
ext x
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· lift x to s using hxs
simp [Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
· lift x to t using (h trivial).resolve_left hxs
rw [extend_apply', Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
exact fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ hxs <| hy ▸ y.2
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h₁ : StronglyMeasurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : StronglyMeasurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁
h₂
@[measurability]
protected theorem indicator {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant indicator functions of measurable sets and that it is closed under
addition and pointwise limit.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction with`. -/
theorem induction [MeasurableSpace α] [AddZeroClass β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(ind : ∀ c ⦃s : Set α⦄ (hs : MeasurableSet s),
P (s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) (stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator hs))
(add : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hfg : StronglyMeasurable (f + g)), Disjoint f.support g.support →
P f hf → P g hg → P (f + g) hfg)
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n using SimpleFunc.induction with
| const c hs => exact ind c hs
| @add f g h_supp hf hg =>
exact add f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable (f + g).stronglyMeasurable h_supp hf hg
open scoped Classical in
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant functions and that it is closed under piecewise combination of functions
and pointwise limits.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction' with`. -/
theorem induction' [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(const : ∀ (c), P (fun _ ↦ c) stronglyMeasurable_const)
(pcw : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ {s} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s), P f hf → P g hg → P (s.piecewise f g) (hf.piecewise hs hg))
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n with
| const c => exact const c
| @pcw f g s hs Pf Pg =>
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact pcw f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable hs Pf Pg
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem dist {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f g : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => dist (f x) (g x) :=
continuous_dist.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[measurability]
protected theorem norm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
@[measurability]
protected theorem nnnorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
/-- The `enorm` of a strongly measurable function is measurable.
Unlike `StrongMeasurable.norm` and `StronglyMeasurable.nnnorm`, this lemma proves measurability,
**not** strong measurability. This is an intentional decision: for functions taking values in
ℝ≥0∞, measurability is much more useful than strong measurability. -/
@[fun_prop, measurability]
protected theorem enorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
{f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
(ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf.nnnorm).measurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ennnorm := StronglyMeasurable.enorm
@[measurability]
protected theorem real_toNNReal {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x).toNNReal :=
continuous_real_toNNReal.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
section PseudoMetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Preorder E] [OrderClosedTopology E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_le (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a ≤ g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_le_prod.measurableSet
lemma measurableSet_lt (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a < g a} := by
simpa only [lt_iff_le_not_le] using (hf.measurableSet_le hg).inter (hg.measurableSet_le hf).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyLE, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_le hg).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_le_of_ae_le_trim, ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end PseudoMetrizableSpace
section MetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [MetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_eq_fun (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a = g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_diagonal.measurableSet
lemma ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_eq_fun hg).compl
lemma ae_eq_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim, ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end MetrizableSpace
theorem stronglyMeasurable_in_set {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {s : Set α}
{f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hf_zero : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) :
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β,
(∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))) ∧ ∀ x ∉ s, ∀ n, fs n x = 0 := by
let g_seq_s : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n => (hf.approx n).restrict s
have hg_eq : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ n, g_seq_s n x = hf.approx n x := by
intro x hx n
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_restrict _ hs, Set.indicator_of_mem hx]
have hg_zero : ∀ x ∉ s, ∀ n, g_seq_s n x = 0 := by
intro x hx n
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_restrict _ hs, Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine ⟨g_seq_s, fun x => ?_, hg_zero⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp_rw [hg_eq x hx]
exact hf.tendsto_approx x
· simp_rw [hg_zero x hx, hf_zero x hx]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
/-- If the restriction to a set `s` of a σ-algebra `m` is included in the restriction to `s` of
another σ-algebra `m₂` (hypothesis `hs`), the set `s` is `m` measurable and a function `f` supported
on `s` is `m`-strongly-measurable, then `f` is also `m₂`-strongly-measurable. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_measurableSpace_le_on {α E} {m m₂ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Zero E] {s : Set α} {f : α → E} (hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hs : ∀ t, MeasurableSet[m] (s ∩ t) → MeasurableSet[m₂] (s ∩ t))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hf_zero : ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 0) :
StronglyMeasurable[m₂] f := by
have hs_m₂ : MeasurableSet[m₂] s := by
rw [← Set.inter_univ s]
refine hs Set.univ ?_
rwa [Set.inter_univ]
obtain ⟨g_seq_s, hg_seq_tendsto, hg_seq_zero⟩ := stronglyMeasurable_in_set hs_m hf hf_zero
let g_seq_s₂ : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m₂ E := fun n =>
{ toFun := g_seq_s n
measurableSet_fiber' := fun x => by
rw [← Set.inter_univ (g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x}), ← Set.union_compl_self s,
Set.inter_union_distrib_left, Set.inter_comm (g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x})]
refine MeasurableSet.union (hs _ (hs_m.inter ?_)) ?_
· exact @SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber _ _ m _ _
by_cases hx : x = 0
· suffices g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x} ∩ sᶜ = sᶜ by
rw [this]
exact hs_m₂.compl
ext1 y
rw [hx, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => ⟨hg_seq_zero y h n, h⟩⟩
· suffices g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x} ∩ sᶜ = ∅ by
rw [this]
exact MeasurableSet.empty
ext1 y
simp only [mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_compl_iff,
mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and, not_not_mem]
refine Function.mtr fun hys => ?_
rw [hg_seq_zero y hys n]
exact Ne.symm hx
finite_range' := @SimpleFunc.finite_range _ _ m (g_seq_s n) }
exact ⟨g_seq_s₂, hg_seq_tendsto⟩
/-- If a function `f` is strongly measurable w.r.t. a sub-σ-algebra `m` and the measure is σ-finite
on `m`, then there exists spanning measurable sets with finite measure on which `f` has bounded
norm. In particular, `f` is integrable on each of those sets. -/
theorem exists_spanning_measurableSet_norm_le [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
∃ s : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet[m] (s n) ∧ μ (s n) < ∞ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s n, ‖f x‖ ≤ n) ∧
⋃ i, s i = Set.univ := by
obtain ⟨s, hs, hs_univ⟩ :=
@exists_spanning_measurableSet_le _ m _ hf.nnnorm.measurable (μ.trim hm) _
refine ⟨s, fun n ↦ ⟨(hs n).1, (le_trim hm).trans_lt (hs n).2.1, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩, hs_univ⟩
have hx_nnnorm : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ n := (hs n).2.2 x hx
rw [← coe_nnnorm]
norm_cast
end StronglyMeasurable
/-! ## Finitely strongly measurable functions -/
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_zero {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [Zero β]
[TopologicalSpace β] : FinStronglyMeasurable (0 : α → β) μ :=
⟨0, by
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_zero, support_zero', measure_empty,
zero_lt_top, forall_const],
fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
namespace FinStronglyMeasurable
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → β}
section sequence
variable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that `∀ x, Tendsto (fun n ↦ hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`
and `∀ n, μ (support (hf.approx n)) < ∞`. These properties are given by
`FinStronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx` and `FinStronglyMeasurable.fin_support_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx : ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem fin_support_approx : ∀ n, μ (support (hf.approx n)) < ∞ :=
hf.choose_spec.1
protected theorem tendsto_approx : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec.2
end sequence
/-- A finitely strongly measurable function is strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨hf.approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
theorem exists_set_sigmaFinite [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β]
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ (∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) ∧ SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := by
rcases hf with ⟨fs, hT_lt_top, h_approx⟩
let T n := support (fs n)
have hT_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (T n) := fun n => SimpleFunc.measurableSet_support (fs n)
let t := ⋃ n, T n
refine ⟨t, MeasurableSet.iUnion hT_meas, ?_, ?_⟩
· have h_fs_zero : ∀ n, ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists] at hxt
simpa [T] using hxt n
refine fun x hxt => tendsto_nhds_unique (h_approx x) ?_
rw [funext fun n => h_fs_zero n x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
· refine ⟨⟨⟨fun n => tᶜ ∪ T n, fun _ => trivial, fun n => ?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩
· rw [Measure.restrict_apply' (MeasurableSet.iUnion hT_meas), Set.union_inter_distrib_right,
Set.compl_inter_self t, Set.empty_union]
exact (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt (hT_lt_top n)
· rw [← Set.union_iUnion tᶜ T]
exact Set.compl_union_self _
/-- A finitely strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
protected theorem measurable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : Measurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable.measurable
section Arithmetic
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem mul [MulZeroClass β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f * g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
intro n
exact (measure_mono (support_mul_subset_left _ _)).trans_lt (hf.fin_support_approx n)
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem add [AddZeroClass β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f + g) μ :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n + hg.approx n, fun n =>
(measure_mono (Function.support_add _ _)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩)),
fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).add (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem neg [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousNeg β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
FinStronglyMeasurable (-f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun n => -hf.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).neg⟩
suffices μ (Function.support fun x => -(hf.approx n) x) < ∞ by convert this
rw [Function.support_neg (hf.approx n)]
exact hf.fin_support_approx n
@[measurability]
protected theorem sub [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousSub β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f - g) μ :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n - hg.approx n, fun n =>
(measure_mono (Function.support_sub _ _)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩)),
fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).sub (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [Zero β]
[SMulZeroClass 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
FinStronglyMeasurable (c • f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_smul]
exact (measure_mono (support_const_smul_subset c _)).trans_lt (hf.fin_support_approx n)
end Arithmetic
section Order
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [SemilatticeSup β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
refine (measure_mono (support_sup _ _)).trans_lt ?_
exact measure_union_lt_top_iff.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [SemilatticeInf β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
refine (measure_mono (support_inf _ _)).trans_lt ?_
exact measure_union_lt_top_iff.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩
end Order
end FinStronglyMeasurable
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_iff_stronglyMeasurable_and_exists_set_sigmaFinite {α β} {f : α → β}
[TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β] [Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔
StronglyMeasurable f ∧
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ (∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) ∧ SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.stronglyMeasurable, hf.exists_set_sigmaFinite⟩, fun hf =>
hf.1.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite hf.2.choose_spec.1 hf.2.choose_spec.2.1
hf.2.choose_spec.2.2⟩
section SecondCountableTopology
variable {G : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
[SecondCountableTopology G] {f : α → G}
/-- In a space with second countable topology and a sigma-finite measure, `FinStronglyMeasurable`
and `Measurable` are equivalent. -/
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => (Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h).finStronglyMeasurable μ⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology and a sigma-finite measure, a measurable function
is `FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_measurable {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[SigmaFinite μ] (hf : Measurable f) : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
(finStronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable μ).mpr hf
end SecondCountableTopology
theorem measurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_measurable {α β ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MetrizableSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OpensMeasurableSpace ι]
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {u : ι → α → β} (hu_cont : ∀ x, Continuous fun i => u i x)
(h : ∀ i, Measurable (u i)) : Measurable (Function.uncurry u) := by
obtain ⟨t_sf, ht_sf⟩ :
∃ t : ℕ → SimpleFunc ι ι, ∀ j x, Tendsto (fun n => u (t n j) x) atTop (𝓝 <| u j x) := by
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable (id : ι → ι) := stronglyMeasurable_id
refine ⟨h_str_meas.approx, fun j x => ?_⟩
exact ((hu_cont x).tendsto j).comp (h_str_meas.tendsto_approx j)
let U (n : ℕ) (p : ι × α) := u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd
have h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 fun p => u p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
exact fun p => ht_sf p.fst p.snd
refine measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto
have h_meas : Measurable fun p : (t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd := by
have :
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : α × (t_sf n).range => u (↑p.snd) p.fst) ∘ Prod.swap :=
rfl
rw [this, @measurable_swap_iff α (↥(t_sf n).range) β m]
exact measurable_from_prod_countable fun j => h j
have :
(fun p : ι × α => u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u p.fst p.snd) ∘ fun p : ι × α =>
(⟨t_sf n p.fst, SimpleFunc.mem_range_self _ _⟩, p.snd) :=
rfl
simp_rw [U, this]
refine h_meas.comp (Measurable.prodMk ?_ measurable_snd)
exact ((t_sf n).measurable.comp measurable_fst).subtype_mk
theorem stronglyMeasurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_stronglyMeasurable {α β ι : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace ι] [MetrizableSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OpensMeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace α]
{u : ι → α → β} (hu_cont : ∀ x, Continuous fun i => u i x) (h : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (u i)) :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.uncurry u) := by
borelize β
obtain ⟨t_sf, ht_sf⟩ :
∃ t : ℕ → SimpleFunc ι ι, ∀ j x, Tendsto (fun n => u (t n j) x) atTop (𝓝 <| u j x) := by
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable (id : ι → ι) := stronglyMeasurable_id
refine ⟨h_str_meas.approx, fun j x => ?_⟩
exact ((hu_cont x).tendsto j).comp (h_str_meas.tendsto_approx j)
let U (n : ℕ) (p : ι × α) := u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd
have h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 fun p => u p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
exact fun p => ht_sf p.fst p.snd
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable fun p : (t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd := by
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· have :
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : α × (t_sf n).range => u (↑p.snd) p.fst) ∘ Prod.swap :=
rfl
rw [this, measurable_swap_iff]
exact measurable_from_prod_countable fun j => (h j).measurable
· have : IsSeparable (⋃ i : (t_sf n).range, range (u i)) :=
.iUnion fun i => (h i).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨⟨i, x⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_range]
exact ⟨i, x, rfl⟩
have :
(fun p : ι × α => u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u p.fst p.snd) ∘ fun p : ι × α =>
(⟨t_sf n p.fst, SimpleFunc.mem_range_self _ _⟩, p.snd) :=
rfl
simp_rw [U, this]
refine h_str_meas.comp_measurable (Measurable.prodMk ?_ measurable_snd)
exact ((t_sf n).measurable.comp measurable_fst).subtype_mk
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 1,472 | 1,475 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
@[to_additive nsmul_sub]
lemma div_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_sub]
lemma div_zpow (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_zpow, inv_zpow]
attribute [field_simps] div_pow div_zpow
end DivisionCommMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b c d : G} {n : ℤ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_inv_self : a / b = b⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_eq_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_surjective (a : G) : Surjective (a * ·) :=
fun x ↦ ⟨a⁻¹ * x, mul_inv_cancel_left a x⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_surjective (a : G) : Function.Surjective fun x ↦ x * a := fun x ↦
⟨x * a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_right x a⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (h : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (h : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul (h : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left, fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv]
/-- Variant of `mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv` with swapped equality. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv' : a * b = 1 ↔ b = a⁻¹ := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq, eq_comm]
/-- Variant of `mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq` with swapped equality. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq' : a * b = 1 ↔ b⁻¹ = a := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one : a = b⁻¹ ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_one : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inj]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem conj_eq_one_iff : a * b * a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_eq_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_left_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ a / b := by
-- FIXME this could be by `simpa`, but it fails. This is probably a bug in `simpa`.
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ mul_left_injective b⁻¹ h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ b / a := by
-- FIXME see above
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ inv_injective (mul_right_injective b h)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma div_mul_cancel_right (a b : G) : a / (b * a) = b⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_div, mul_div_cancel_right]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 731 | 731 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
/-!
# Right-angled triangles
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and angles in (possibly degenerate)
right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
## Implementation notes
Results in this file are generally given in a form with only those non-degeneracy conditions
needed for the particular result, rather than requiring affine independence of the points of a
triangle unnecessarily.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero]
exact inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq' (x y : V) (h : angle x y = π / 2) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero]
exact inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq' (x y : V) (h : angle x y = π / 2) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y).2 h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
angle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [angle, inner_add_right, h, add_zero, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
by_cases hx : ‖x‖ = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [div_mul_eq_div_div, mul_self_div_self]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
angle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hxy : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by
rw [pow_two, norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h, ne_comm]
refine ne_of_lt ?_
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0)
· exact
Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)) (mul_self_nonneg _)
· exact
Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0))
rw [angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h,
Real.arccos_eq_arcsin (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)), div_pow, one_sub_div hxy]
nth_rw 1 [pow_two]
rw [norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h, pow_two, add_sub_cancel_left, ← pow_two, ← div_pow,
Real.sqrt_sq (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0) :
angle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero h (Or.inl h0), Real.arctan_eq_arcsin, ←
div_mul_eq_div_div, norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero.2 h]
nth_rw 3 [← Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg x)]
rw_mod_cast [← Real.sqrt_mul (sq_nonneg _), div_pow, pow_two, pow_two, mul_add, mul_one, mul_div,
mul_comm (‖x‖ * ‖x‖), ← mul_div, div_self (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)).ne', mul_one]
/-- An angle in a non-degenerate right-angled triangle is positive. -/
theorem angle_add_pos_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x = 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
0 < angle x (x + y) := by
rw [angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h, Real.arccos_pos,
norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero.2 h]
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [div_lt_one (Real.sqrt_pos.2 (Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mul_self_pos.2
(norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)) (mul_self_nonneg _))), Real.lt_sqrt (norm_nonneg _), pow_two]
simpa [hx] using h0
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle is at most `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_add_le_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
angle x (x + y) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h, Real.arccos_le_pi_div_two]
exact div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
/-- An angle in a non-degenerate right-angled triangle is less than `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_add_lt_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0) :
angle x (x + y) < π / 2 := by
rw [angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h, Real.arccos_lt_pi_div_two,
norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero.2 h]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 h0) (Real.sqrt_pos.2 (Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
(mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)) (mul_self_nonneg _)))
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.cos (angle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h,
Real.cos_arccos (le_trans (by norm_num) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)))
(div_le_one_of_le₀ _ (norm_nonneg _))]
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _),
norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
Real.sin (angle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero h h0,
Real.sin_arcsin (le_trans (by norm_num) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)))
(div_le_one_of_le₀ _ (norm_nonneg _))]
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _),
norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.tan (angle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
by_cases h0 : x = 0; · simp [h0]
rw [angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero h h0, Real.tan_arctan]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.cos (angle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
by_cases hxy : ‖x + y‖ = 0
· have h' := norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h
rw [hxy, zero_mul, eq_comm,
add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg ‖x‖) (mul_self_nonneg ‖y‖), mul_self_eq_zero] at h'
simp [h'.1]
· exact div_mul_cancel₀ _ hxy
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.sin (angle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
by_cases h0 : x = 0 ∧ y = 0; · simp [h0]
rw [not_and_or] at h0
rw [sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0, div_mul_cancel₀]
rw [← mul_self_ne_zero, norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h]
refine (ne_of_lt ?_).symm
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0)
· exact Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)) (mul_self_nonneg _)
· exact Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0))
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0) :
Real.tan (angle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0) <;> simp [h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0) :
‖x‖ / Real.cos (angle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0)
· rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)]
· simp [h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x = 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
‖y‖ / Real.sin (angle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0); · simp [h0]
rw [sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h (Or.inr h0), div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x = 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
‖y‖ / Real.tan (angle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
rw [tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0)
· simp [h0]
· rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
angle x (x - y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
angle x (x - y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [or_comm, ← neg_ne_zero, or_comm] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero h h0, norm_neg]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0) :
angle x (x - y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero h h0, norm_neg]
/-- An angle in a non-degenerate right-angled triangle is positive, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem angle_sub_pos_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x = 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
0 < angle x (x - y) := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [← neg_ne_zero] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact angle_add_pos_of_inner_eq_zero h h0
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle is at most `π / 2`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem angle_sub_le_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
angle x (x - y) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact angle_add_le_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero h
/-- An angle in a non-degenerate right-angled triangle is less than `π / 2`, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem angle_sub_lt_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0) :
angle x (x - y) < π / 2 := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact angle_add_lt_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero h h0
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.cos (angle x (x - y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [or_comm, ← neg_ne_zero, or_comm] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0, norm_neg]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.tan (angle x (x - y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h, norm_neg]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.cos (angle x (x - y)) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h, norm_neg]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0) :
Real.tan (angle x (x - y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [← neg_eq_zero] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h h0, norm_neg]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0) :
‖x‖ / Real.cos (angle x (x - y)) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [← neg_eq_zero] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x = 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
‖y‖ / Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [← neg_ne_zero] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← norm_neg, norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x = 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
‖y‖ / Real.tan (angle x (x - y)) = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right] at h
rw [← neg_ne_zero] at h0
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← norm_neg, norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
end InnerProductGeometry
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- **Pythagorean theorem**, if-and-only-if angle-at-point form. -/
theorem dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) :
dist p₁ p₃ * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ * dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ * dist p₃ p₂ ↔
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
erw [dist_comm p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂,
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₂ p₃, ← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₃, norm_neg]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arccos (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arcsin (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, @ne_comm _ p₃, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ p₂, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₃ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arctan (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂) := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- An angle in a non-degenerate right-angled triangle is positive. -/
theorem angle_pos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂) : 0 < ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, eq_comm, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃, add_comm]
exact angle_add_pos_of_inner_eq_zero h h0
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle is at most `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_le_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃, add_comm]
exact angle_add_le_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero h
/-- An angle in a non-degenerate right-angled triangle is less than `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_lt_pi_div_two_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₃ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ < π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V] at h0
rw [angle, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃, add_comm]
exact angle_add_lt_pi_div_two_of_inner_eq_zero h h0
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.cos (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : Real.sin (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, @ne_comm _ p₃, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ p₂, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.tan (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.cos (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2) :
Real.sin (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : Real.tan (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₃ p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem dist_div_cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂) : dist p₃ p₂ / Real.cos (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₃ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem dist_div_sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂) : dist p₁ p₂ / Real.sin (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₃ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [eq_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem dist_div_tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2)
(h0 : p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂) : dist p₁ p₂ / Real.tan (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [angle, ← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, real_inner_comm, ← neg_eq_zero, ←
inner_neg_left, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at h
rw [eq_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, or_comm] at h0
rw [angle, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub' V p₃ p₂, ← vsub_add_vsub_cancel p₁ p₂ p₃,
add_comm, norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero h h0]
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/RightAngle.lean | 476 | 482 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (Pi.map f) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuous_apply i)
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
protected theorem IsOpenMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] {f : ∀ i, π i → Y i}
(hfo : ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f i)) (hsurj : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) :
IsOpenMap (Pi.map f) := by
refine IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_pi, nhds_pi, map_piMap_pi hsurj]
exact Filter.pi_mono fun i ↦ (hfo i).nhds_le _
protected theorem IsOpenQuotientMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, IsOpenQuotientMap (f i)) : IsOpenQuotientMap (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2, .piMap (fun i ↦ (hf i).3) <|
.of_forall fun i ↦ (hf i).1⟩
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem ContinuousAt.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} {x : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (f i) (x i)) :
ContinuousAt (Pi.map f) x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuousAt_apply i x)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp_def]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Set ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict (s : Finset ι) : Continuous (s.restrict (π := π)) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Finset ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
Continuous (Finset.restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
variable [TopologicalSpace Z]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Set X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Set X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Finset X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Finset X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
section Fin
variable {n : ℕ} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finCons
{f : Y → π 0} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.succ} {l : Filter Y} {x : π 0} {y : ∀ j, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.cons x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.cases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finCons hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.matrixVecCons
{f : Y → Z} {g : Y → Fin n → Z} {l : Filter Y} {x : Z} {y : Fin n → Z}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Matrix.vecCons x y) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem ContinuousAt.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finSnoc
{f : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : Y → π (Fin.last _)}
{l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π (Fin.castSucc j)} {y : π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.snoc x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.lastCases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hf) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finSnoc hg
theorem Continuous.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finSnoc hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {l : Filter Y}
{x : π i} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth := Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInsertNth i hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth := ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
theorem Continuous.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finInsertNth i hg.continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Continuous.fin_insertNth := Continuous.finInsertNth
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInit {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.init x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.castSucc
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInit
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finInit
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finTail {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.tail x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.succ
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finTail
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finTail
end Fin
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
classical
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
· rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
theorem isOpen_pi_iff' [Finite ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ u : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ univ.pi u ⊆ s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose,
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose_spec.2,
(pi_mono fun i _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.1).trans (Subset.trans ?_ h2)⟩⟩
rw [← pi_inter_compl (I : Set ι)]
exact inter_subset_left
· exact fun ⟨u, ⟨h1, _⟩⟩ =>
⟨Finset.univ, u, ⟨fun i => ⟨u i, ⟨rfl.subset, h1 i⟩⟩, by rwa [Finset.coe_univ]⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsClosed (s a)) :
IsClosed (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact isClosed_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem mem_nhds_of_pi_mem_nhds {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) (hs : I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a)
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ I) : s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi] at hs; exact mem_of_pi_mem_pi hs hi
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ 𝓝 (x a)) : pi i s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [pi_def, biInter_mem hi]
exact fun a ha => (continuous_apply a).continuousAt (hs a ha)
theorem set_pi_mem_nhds_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} (a : ∀ i, π i) :
I.pi s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ i : ι, i ∈ I → s i ∈ 𝓝 (a i) := by
rw [nhds_pi, pi_mem_pi_iff hI]
theorem interior_pi_set {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
interior (pi I s) = I.pi fun i => interior (s i) := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_pi, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, set_pi_mem_nhds_iff hI]
theorem exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds [DecidableEq ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} {x : ∀ a, π a}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (y : ∀ a, π a) : ∃ I : Finset ι, I.piecewise x y ∈ s := by
simp only [nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi'] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨I, t, htx, hts⟩
refine ⟨I, hts fun i hi => ?_⟩
simpa [Finset.mem_coe.1 hi] using mem_of_mem_nhds (htx i)
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom
{ t | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi (↑i) s } := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· apply le_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨s, i, hi, rfl⟩
letI := fun a => generateFrom (g a)
exact isOpen_set_pi i.finite_toSet (fun a ha => GenerateOpen.basic _ (hi a ha))
· classical
refine le_iInf fun i => coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 <| le_generateFrom fun s hs => ?_
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨update (fun i => univ) i s, {i}, ?_⟩
simp [hs]
theorem pi_eq_generateFrom :
Pi.topologicalSpace =
generateFrom
{ g | ∃ (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) (i : Finset ι), (∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) ∧ g = pi (↑i) s } :=
calc Pi.topologicalSpace
_ = @Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun _ => generateFrom { s | IsOpen s } := by
simp only [generateFrom_setOf_isOpen]
_ = _ := pi_generateFrom_eq
theorem pi_generateFrom_eq_finite {π : ι → Type*} {g : ∀ a, Set (Set (π a))} [Finite ι]
(hg : ∀ a, ⋃₀ g a = univ) :
(@Pi.topologicalSpace ι π fun a => generateFrom (g a)) =
generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s } := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [pi_generateFrom_eq]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti ?_) (le_generateFrom ?_)
· exact fun s ⟨t, ht, Eq⟩ => ⟨t, Finset.univ, by simp [ht, Eq]⟩
· rintro s ⟨t, i, ht, rfl⟩
letI := generateFrom { t | ∃ s : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, s a ∈ g a) ∧ t = pi univ s }
refine isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open.2 fun f hf => ?_
choose c hcg hfc using fun a => sUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (hg a) (f a)
refine ⟨pi i t ∩ pi ((↑i)ᶜ : Set ι) c, inter_subset_left, ?_, ⟨hf, fun a _ => hfc a⟩⟩
classical
rw [← univ_pi_piecewise]
refine GenerateOpen.basic _ ⟨_, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩
by_cases a ∈ i <;> simp [*]
theorem induced_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : X → ∀ i, π i) :
induced f Pi.topologicalSpace = ⨅ i, induced (f · i) inferInstance := by
simp_rw [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, Function.comp_def]
/-- Suppose `π i` is a family of topological spaces indexed by `i : ι`, and `X` is a type
endowed with a family of maps `f i : X → π i` for every `i : ι`, hence inducing a
map `g : X → Π i, π i`. This lemma shows that infimum of the topologies on `X` induced by
the `f i` as `i : ι` varies is simply the topology on `X` induced by `g : X → Π i, π i`
where `Π i, π i` is endowed with the usual product topology. -/
theorem inducing_iInf_to_pi {X : Type*} (f : ∀ i, X → π i) :
@IsInducing X (∀ i, π i) (⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance) _ fun x i => f i x :=
letI := ⨅ i, induced (f i) inferInstance; ⟨(induced_to_pi _).symm⟩
variable [Finite ι] [∀ i, DiscreteTopology (π i)]
/-- A finite product of discrete spaces is discrete. -/
instance Pi.discreteTopology : DiscreteTopology (∀ i, π i) :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp fun x => by
rw [← univ_pi_singleton]
exact isOpen_set_pi finite_univ fun i _ => (isOpen_discrete {x i})
end Pi
section Sigma
variable {ι κ : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} {τ : κ → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (σ i)]
[∀ k, TopologicalSpace (τ k)] [TopologicalSpace X]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sigmaMk {i : ι} : Continuous (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
continuous_iSup_rng continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem isOpen_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [isOpen_iSup_iff]
rfl
theorem isClosed_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sigma_iff, preimage_compl]
theorem isOpenMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isOpen_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isOpen_empty
theorem isOpen_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpen (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isOpenMap_sigmaMk.isOpen_range
theorem isClosedMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by
intro s hs
rw [isClosed_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isClosed_empty
theorem isClosed_range_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosed (range (@Sigma.mk ι σ i)) :=
isClosedMap_sigmaMk.isClosed_range
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
.of_continuous_injective_isOpenMap continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective isOpenMap_sigmaMk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMk := IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk
lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsClosedEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
.of_continuous_injective_isClosedMap continuous_sigmaMk sigma_mk_injective isClosedMap_sigmaMk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isClosedEmbedding_sigmaMk := IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsEmbedding (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
IsClosedEmbedding.sigmaMk.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_sigmaMk := IsEmbedding.sigmaMk
theorem Sigma.nhds_mk (i : ι) (x : σ i) : 𝓝 (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma σ) = Filter.map (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 x) :=
(IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk.map_nhds_eq x).symm
theorem Sigma.nhds_eq (x : Sigma σ) : 𝓝 x = Filter.map (Sigma.mk x.1) (𝓝 x.2) := by
cases x
apply Sigma.nhds_mk
theorem comap_sigmaMk_nhds (i : ι) (x : σ i) : comap (Sigma.mk i) (𝓝 ⟨i, x⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
(IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.nhds_eq_comap _).symm
theorem isOpen_sigma_fst_preimage (s : Set ι) : IsOpen (Sigma.fst ⁻¹' s : Set (Σ a, σ a)) := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
simp only [← range_sigmaMk]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_range_sigmaMk
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous iff its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuous_sigma_iff {f : Sigma σ → X} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceSigma
rw [continuous_iSup_dom]
exact forall_congr' fun _ => continuous_coinduced_dom
/-- A map out of a sum type is continuous if its restriction to each summand is. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_sigma_iff.2 hf
/-- A map defined on a sigma type (a.k.a. the disjoint union of an indexed family of topological
spaces) is inducing iff its restriction to each component is inducing and each the image of each
component under `f` can be separated from the images of all other components by an open set. -/
theorem inducing_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} :
IsInducing f ↔ (∀ i, IsInducing (f ∘ Sigma.mk i)) ∧
(∀ i, ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ U ↔ x.1 = i) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ h.comp IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.1, fun i ↦ ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases h.isOpen_iff.1 (isOpen_range_sigmaMk (i := i)) with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
refine ⟨U, hUo, ?_⟩
simpa [Set.ext_iff] using hU
· refine fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ isInducing_iff_nhds.2 fun ⟨i, x⟩ ↦ ?_
rw [Sigma.nhds_mk, (h₁ i).nhds_eq_comap, comp_apply, ← comap_comap, map_comap_of_mem]
rcases h₂ i with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap <| hUo.mem_nhds <| (hU _).2 rfl] with y hy
simpa [hU] using hy
@[simp 1100]
theorem continuous_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i) :=
continuous_sigma_iff.trans <| by
simp only [Sigma.map, IsEmbedding.sigmaMk.continuous_iff, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f₂ i)) :
Continuous (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) :=
continuous_sigma_map.2 hf
theorem isOpenMap_sigma {f : Sigma σ → X} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩ := by
simp only [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_eq, map_map, comp_def]
theorem isOpenMap_sigma_map {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} :
IsOpenMap (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f₂ i) :=
isOpenMap_sigma.trans <|
forall_congr' fun i => (@IsOpenEmbedding.sigmaMk _ _ _ (f₁ i)).isOpenMap_iff.symm
lemma Topology.isInducing_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)}
(h₁ : Injective f₁) : IsInducing (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsInducing (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isInducing_iff_nhds, Sigma.forall, Sigma.nhds_mk, Sigma.map_mk,
← map_sigma_mk_comap h₁, map_inj sigma_mk_injective]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_sigma_map := isInducing_sigmaMap
lemma Topology.isEmbedding_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)}
(h : Injective f₁) : IsEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isEmbedding_iff, Injective.sigma_map, isInducing_sigmaMap h, forall_and,
h.sigma_map_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_sigma_map := isEmbedding_sigmaMap
lemma Topology.isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMap {f₁ : ι → κ} {f₂ : ∀ i, σ i → τ (f₁ i)} (h : Injective f₁) :
IsOpenEmbedding (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenEmbedding (f₂ i) := by
simp only [isOpenEmbedding_iff_isEmbedding_isOpenMap, isOpenMap_sigma_map, isEmbedding_sigmaMap h,
forall_and]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias isOpenEmbedding_sigma_map := isOpenEmbedding_sigmaMap
end Sigma
section ULift
theorem ULift.isOpen_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [ULift.topologicalSpace, ← Equiv.ulift_apply, ← Equiv.ulift.coinduced_symm, ← isOpen_coinduced]
theorem ULift.isClosed_iff [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set (ULift.{v} X)} :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed (ULift.up ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff, preimage_compl]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_uliftDown [TopologicalSpace X] : Continuous (ULift.down : ULift.{v, u} X → X) :=
continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_uliftUp [TopologicalSpace X] : Continuous (ULift.up : X → ULift.{v, u} X) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 continuous_id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-10")] alias continuous_uLift_down := continuous_uliftDown
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-10")] alias continuous_uLift_up := continuous_uliftUp
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_uliftMap [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
(f : X → Y) (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (ULift.map f : ULift.{u'} X → ULift.{v'} Y) := by
change Continuous (ULift.up ∘ f ∘ ULift.down)
fun_prop
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.uliftDown [TopologicalSpace X] :
IsEmbedding (ULift.down : ULift.{v, u} X → X) := ⟨⟨rfl⟩, ULift.down_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_uLift_down := IsEmbedding.uliftDown
lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.uliftDown [TopologicalSpace X] :
IsClosedEmbedding (ULift.down : ULift.{v, u} X → X) :=
⟨.uliftDown, by simp only [ULift.down_surjective.range_eq, isClosed_univ]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ULift.isClosedEmbedding_down := IsClosedEmbedding.uliftDown
instance [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (ULift X) :=
IsEmbedding.uliftDown.discreteTopology
end ULift
section Monad
variable [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} {t : Set s}
theorem IsOpen.trans (ht : IsOpen t) (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen (t : Set X) := by
rcases isOpen_induced_iff.mp ht with ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter hs'
theorem IsClosed.trans (ht : IsClosed t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsClosed (t : Set X) := by
rcases isClosed_induced_iff.mp ht with ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter hs'
end Monad
section NhdsSet
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{s : Set X} {t : Set Y}
/-- The product of a neighborhood of `s` and a neighborhood of `t` is a neighborhood of `s ×ˢ t`,
formulated in terms of a filter inequality. -/
theorem nhdsSet_prod_le (s : Set X) (t : Set Y) : 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ t) ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t :=
((hasBasis_nhdsSet _).prod (hasBasis_nhdsSet _)).ge_iff.2 fun (_u, _v) ⟨⟨huo, hsu⟩, hvo, htv⟩ ↦
(huo.prod hvo).mem_nhdsSet.2 <| prod_mono hsu htv
theorem Filter.eventually_nhdsSet_prod_iff {p : X × Y → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ q in 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ t), p q) ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t,
∃ px : X → Prop, (∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, px x') ∧ ∃ py : Y → Prop, (∀ᶠ y' in 𝓝 y, py y') ∧
∀ {x : X}, px x → ∀ {y : Y}, py y → p (x, y) := by
simp_rw [eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall, forall_prod_set, nhds_prod_eq, eventually_prod_iff]
theorem Filter.Eventually.prod_nhdsSet {p : X × Y → Prop} {px : X → Prop} {py : Y → Prop}
(hp : ∀ {x : X}, px x → ∀ {y : Y}, py y → p (x, y)) (hs : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, px x)
(ht : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝ˢ t, py y) : ∀ᶠ q in 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ t), p q :=
nhdsSet_prod_le _ _ (mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod hs ht) fun _ ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ hp hx hy)
end NhdsSet
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,478 | 1,480 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Ira Fesefeldt
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Monad.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.Part
import Mathlib.Order.Preorder.Chain
import Mathlib.Order.ScottContinuity
/-!
# Omega Complete Partial Orders
An omega-complete partial order is a partial order with a supremum
operation on increasing sequences indexed by natural numbers (which we
call `ωSup`). In this sense, it is strictly weaker than join complete
semi-lattices as only ω-sized totally ordered sets have a supremum.
The concept of an omega-complete partial order (ωCPO) is useful for the
formalization of the semantics of programming languages. Its notion of
supremum helps define the meaning of recursive procedures.
## Main definitions
* class `OmegaCompletePartialOrder`
* `ite`, `map`, `bind`, `seq` as continuous morphisms
## Instances of `OmegaCompletePartialOrder`
* `Part`
* every `CompleteLattice`
* pi-types
* product types
* `OrderHom`
* `ContinuousHom` (with notation →𝒄)
* an instance of `OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α →𝒄 β)`
* `ContinuousHom.ofFun`
* `ContinuousHom.ofMono`
* continuous functions:
* `id`
* `ite`
* `const`
* `Part.bind`
* `Part.map`
* `Part.seq`
## References
* [Chain-complete posets and directed sets with applications][markowsky1976]
* [Recursive definitions of partial functions and their computations][cadiou1972]
* [Semantics of Programming Languages: Structures and Techniques][gunter1992]
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
universe u v
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β γ δ : Type*}
namespace OmegaCompletePartialOrder
/-- A chain is a monotone sequence.
See the definition on page 114 of [gunter1992]. -/
def Chain (α : Type u) [Preorder α] :=
ℕ →o α
namespace Chain
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
instance : FunLike (Chain α) ℕ α := inferInstanceAs <| FunLike (ℕ →o α) ℕ α
instance : OrderHomClass (Chain α) ℕ α := inferInstanceAs <| OrderHomClass (ℕ →o α) ℕ α
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Chain α) :=
⟨⟨default, fun _ _ _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
instance : Membership α (Chain α) :=
⟨fun (c : ℕ →o α) a => ∃ i, a = c i⟩
variable (c c' : Chain α)
variable (f : α →o β)
variable (g : β →o γ)
instance : LE (Chain α) where le x y := ∀ i, ∃ j, x i ≤ y j
lemma isChain_range : IsChain (· ≤ ·) (Set.range c) := Monotone.isChain_range (OrderHomClass.mono c)
lemma directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) c := directedOn_range.2 c.isChain_range.directedOn
/-- `map` function for `Chain` -/
-- Porting note: `simps` doesn't work with type synonyms
-- @[simps! -fullyApplied]
def map : Chain β :=
f.comp c
@[simp] theorem map_coe : ⇑(map c f) = f ∘ c := rfl
variable {f}
theorem mem_map (x : α) : x ∈ c → f x ∈ Chain.map c f :=
fun ⟨i, h⟩ => ⟨i, h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ c.map f → ∃ a, a ∈ c ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨i, h⟩ => ⟨c i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff {b : β} : b ∈ c.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ c ∧ f a = b :=
⟨exists_of_mem_map _, fun h => by
rcases h with ⟨w, h, h'⟩
subst b
apply mem_map c _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_id : c.map OrderHom.id = c :=
OrderHom.comp_id _
theorem map_comp : (c.map f).map g = c.map (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[mono]
theorem map_le_map {g : α →o β} (h : f ≤ g) : c.map f ≤ c.map g :=
fun i => by simp only [map_coe, Function.comp_apply]; exists i; apply h
/-- `OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain.zip` pairs up the elements of two chains
that have the same index. -/
-- Porting note: `simps` doesn't work with type synonyms
-- @[simps!]
def zip (c₀ : Chain α) (c₁ : Chain β) : Chain (α × β) :=
OrderHom.prod c₀ c₁
@[simp] theorem zip_coe (c₀ : Chain α) (c₁ : Chain β) (n : ℕ) : c₀.zip c₁ n = (c₀ n, c₁ n) := rfl
/-- An example of a `Chain` constructed from an ordered pair. -/
def pair (a b : α) (hab : a ≤ b) : Chain α where
toFun
| 0 => a
| _ => b
monotone' _ _ _ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma pair_zero (a b : α) (hab) : pair a b hab 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma pair_succ (a b : α) (hab) (n : ℕ) : pair a b hab (n + 1) = b := rfl
@[simp] lemma range_pair (a b : α) (hab) : Set.range (pair a b hab) = {a, b} := by
ext; exact Nat.or_exists_add_one.symm.trans (by aesop)
@[simp] lemma pair_zip_pair (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) (ha hb) :
(pair a₁ a₂ ha).zip (pair b₁ b₂ hb) = pair (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) (Prod.le_def.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩) := by
unfold Chain; ext n : 2; cases n <;> rfl
end Chain
end OmegaCompletePartialOrder
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
/-- An omega-complete partial order is a partial order with a supremum
operation on increasing sequences indexed by natural numbers (which we
call `ωSup`). In this sense, it is strictly weaker than join complete
semi-lattices as only ω-sized totally ordered sets have a supremum.
See the definition on page 114 of [gunter1992]. -/
class OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α : Type*) extends PartialOrder α where
/-- The supremum of an increasing sequence -/
ωSup : Chain α → α
/-- `ωSup` is an upper bound of the increasing sequence -/
le_ωSup : ∀ c : Chain α, ∀ i, c i ≤ ωSup c
/-- `ωSup` is a lower bound of the set of upper bounds of the increasing sequence -/
ωSup_le : ∀ (c : Chain α) (x), (∀ i, c i ≤ x) → ωSup c ≤ x
namespace OmegaCompletePartialOrder
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α]
/-- Transfer an `OmegaCompletePartialOrder` on `β` to an `OmegaCompletePartialOrder` on `α`
using a strictly monotone function `f : β →o α`, a definition of ωSup and a proof that `f` is
continuous with regard to the provided `ωSup` and the ωCPO on `α`. -/
protected abbrev lift [PartialOrder β] (f : β →o α) (ωSup₀ : Chain β → β)
(h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y → x ≤ y) (h' : ∀ c, f (ωSup₀ c) = ωSup (c.map f)) :
OmegaCompletePartialOrder β where
ωSup := ωSup₀
ωSup_le c x hx := h _ _ (by rw [h']; apply ωSup_le; intro i; apply f.monotone (hx i))
le_ωSup c i := h _ _ (by rw [h']; apply le_ωSup (c.map f))
theorem le_ωSup_of_le {c : Chain α} {x : α} (i : ℕ) (h : x ≤ c i) : x ≤ ωSup c :=
le_trans h (le_ωSup c _)
theorem ωSup_total {c : Chain α} {x : α} (h : ∀ i, c i ≤ x ∨ x ≤ c i) : ωSup c ≤ x ∨ x ≤ ωSup c :=
by_cases
(fun (this : ∀ i, c i ≤ x) => Or.inl (ωSup_le _ _ this))
(fun (this : ¬∀ i, c i ≤ x) =>
have : ∃ i, ¬c i ≤ x := by simp only [not_forall] at this ⊢; assumption
let ⟨i, hx⟩ := this
have : x ≤ c i := (h i).resolve_left hx
Or.inr <| le_ωSup_of_le _ this)
@[mono]
theorem ωSup_le_ωSup_of_le {c₀ c₁ : Chain α} (h : c₀ ≤ c₁) : ωSup c₀ ≤ ωSup c₁ :=
(ωSup_le _ _) fun i => by
obtain ⟨_, h⟩ := h i
exact le_trans h (le_ωSup _ _)
@[simp] theorem ωSup_le_iff {c : Chain α} {x : α} : ωSup c ≤ x ↔ ∀ i, c i ≤ x := by
constructor <;> intros
· trans ωSup c
· exact le_ωSup _ _
· assumption
exact ωSup_le _ _ ‹_›
lemma isLUB_range_ωSup (c : Chain α) : IsLUB (Set.range c) (ωSup c) := by
constructor
· simp only [upperBounds, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun a ↦ le_ωSup c a
· simp only [lowerBounds, upperBounds, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun ⦃a⦄ a_1 ↦ ωSup_le c a a_1
lemma ωSup_eq_of_isLUB {c : Chain α} {a : α} (h : IsLUB (Set.range c) a) : a = ωSup c := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff]
simp only [IsLUB, IsLeast, upperBounds, lowerBounds, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at h
constructor
· apply h.2
exact fun a ↦ le_ωSup c a
· rw [ωSup_le_iff]
apply h.1
/-- A subset `p : α → Prop` of the type closed under `ωSup` induces an
`OmegaCompletePartialOrder` on the subtype `{a : α // p a}`. -/
def subtype {α : Type*} [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] (p : α → Prop)
(hp : ∀ c : Chain α, (∀ i ∈ c, p i) → p (ωSup c)) : OmegaCompletePartialOrder (Subtype p) :=
OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lift (OrderHom.Subtype.val p)
(fun c => ⟨ωSup _, hp (c.map (OrderHom.Subtype.val p)) fun _ ⟨n, q⟩ => q.symm ▸ (c n).2⟩)
(fun _ _ h => h) (fun _ => rfl)
section Continuity
open Chain
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder β]
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder γ]
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
/-- A function `f` between `ω`-complete partial orders is `ωScottContinuous` if it is
Scott continuous over chains. -/
def ωScottContinuous (f : α → β) : Prop :=
ScottContinuousOn (Set.range fun c : Chain α => Set.range c) f
lemma _root_.ScottContinuous.ωScottContinuous (hf : ScottContinuous f) : ωScottContinuous f :=
hf.scottContinuousOn
lemma ωScottContinuous.monotone (h : ωScottContinuous f) : Monotone f :=
ScottContinuousOn.monotone _ (fun a b hab => by
use pair a b hab; exact range_pair a b hab) h
lemma ωScottContinuous.isLUB {c : Chain α} (hf : ωScottContinuous f) :
IsLUB (Set.range (c.map ⟨f, hf.monotone⟩)) (f (ωSup c)) := by
simpa [map_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk, Set.range_comp]
using hf (by simp) (Set.range_nonempty _) (isChain_range c).directedOn (isLUB_range_ωSup c)
lemma ωScottContinuous.id : ωScottContinuous (id : α → α) := ScottContinuousOn.id
lemma ωScottContinuous.map_ωSup (hf : ωScottContinuous f) (c : Chain α) :
f (ωSup c) = ωSup (c.map ⟨f, hf.monotone⟩) := ωSup_eq_of_isLUB hf.isLUB
/-- `ωScottContinuous f` asserts that `f` is both monotone and distributes over ωSup. -/
lemma ωScottContinuous_iff_monotone_map_ωSup :
ωScottContinuous f ↔ ∃ hf : Monotone f, ∀ c : Chain α, f (ωSup c) = ωSup (c.map ⟨f, hf⟩) := by
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.monotone, hf.map_ωSup⟩, ?_⟩
intro hf _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ _ _ hda
convert isLUB_range_ωSup (c.map { toFun := f, monotone' := hf.1 })
· rw [map_coe, OrderHom.coe_mk, ← hc, ← (Set.range_comp f ⇑c)]
· rw [← hc] at hda
rw [← hf.2 c, ωSup_eq_of_isLUB hda]
alias ⟨ωScottContinuous.monotone_map_ωSup, ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup⟩ :=
ωScottContinuous_iff_monotone_map_ωSup
/- A monotone function `f : α →o β` is ωScott continuous if and only if it distributes over ωSup. -/
lemma ωScottContinuous_iff_map_ωSup_of_orderHom {f : α →o β} :
ωScottContinuous f ↔ ∀ c : Chain α, f (ωSup c) = ωSup (c.map f) := by
rw [ωScottContinuous_iff_monotone_map_ωSup]
exact exists_prop_of_true f.monotone'
alias ⟨ωScottContinuous.map_ωSup_of_orderHom, ωScottContinuous.of_map_ωSup_of_orderHom⟩ :=
ωScottContinuous_iff_map_ωSup_of_orderHom
lemma ωScottContinuous.comp (hg : ωScottContinuous g) (hf : ωScottContinuous f) :
ωScottContinuous (g.comp f) :=
ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨hg.monotone.comp hf.monotone, by simp [hf.map_ωSup, hg.map_ωSup, map_comp]⟩
lemma ωScottContinuous.const {x : β} : ωScottContinuous (Function.const α x) := by
simp [ωScottContinuous, ScottContinuousOn, Set.range_nonempty]
end Continuity
end OmegaCompletePartialOrder
namespace Part
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
theorem eq_of_chain {c : Chain (Part α)} {a b : α} (ha : some a ∈ c) (hb : some b ∈ c) : a = b := by
obtain ⟨i, ha⟩ := ha; replace ha := ha.symm
obtain ⟨j, hb⟩ := hb; replace hb := hb.symm
rw [eq_some_iff] at ha hb
rcases le_total i j with hij | hji
· have := c.monotone hij _ ha; apply mem_unique this hb
· have := c.monotone hji _ hb; apply Eq.symm; apply mem_unique this ha
open Classical in
/-- The (noncomputable) `ωSup` definition for the `ω`-CPO structure on `Part α`. -/
protected noncomputable def ωSup (c : Chain (Part α)) : Part α :=
if h : ∃ a, some a ∈ c then some (Classical.choose h) else none
theorem ωSup_eq_some {c : Chain (Part α)} {a : α} (h : some a ∈ c) : Part.ωSup c = some a :=
have : ∃ a, some a ∈ c := ⟨a, h⟩
have a' : some (Classical.choose this) ∈ c := Classical.choose_spec this
calc
Part.ωSup c = some (Classical.choose this) := dif_pos this
_ = some a := congr_arg _ (eq_of_chain a' h)
theorem ωSup_eq_none {c : Chain (Part α)} (h : ¬∃ a, some a ∈ c) : Part.ωSup c = none :=
dif_neg h
theorem mem_chain_of_mem_ωSup {c : Chain (Part α)} {a : α} (h : a ∈ Part.ωSup c) : some a ∈ c := by
simp only [Part.ωSup] at h; split_ifs at h with h_1
· have h' := Classical.choose_spec h_1
rw [← eq_some_iff] at h
rw [← h]
exact h'
· rcases h with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
noncomputable instance omegaCompletePartialOrder :
OmegaCompletePartialOrder (Part α) where
ωSup := Part.ωSup
le_ωSup c i := by
intro x hx
rw [← eq_some_iff] at hx ⊢
rw [ωSup_eq_some]
rw [← hx]
exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
ωSup_le := by
rintro c x hx a ha
replace ha := mem_chain_of_mem_ωSup ha
obtain ⟨i, ha⟩ := ha
apply hx i
rw [← ha]
apply mem_some
section Inst
theorem mem_ωSup (x : α) (c : Chain (Part α)) : x ∈ ωSup c ↔ some x ∈ c := by
simp only [ωSup, Part.ωSup]
constructor
· split_ifs with h
swap
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
intro h'
have hh := Classical.choose_spec h
simp only [mem_some_iff] at h'
subst x
exact hh
· intro h
have h' : ∃ a : α, some a ∈ c := ⟨_, h⟩
rw [dif_pos h']
have hh := Classical.choose_spec h'
rw [eq_of_chain hh h]
simp
end Inst
end Part
section Pi
variable {β : α → Type*}
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Chain
instance [∀ a, OmegaCompletePartialOrder (β a)] :
OmegaCompletePartialOrder (∀ a, β a) where
ωSup c a := ωSup (c.map (Pi.evalOrderHom a))
ωSup_le _ _ hf a :=
ωSup_le _ _ <| by
rintro i
apply hf
le_ωSup _ _ _ := le_ωSup_of_le _ <| le_rfl
namespace OmegaCompletePartialOrder
variable [∀ x, OmegaCompletePartialOrder <| β x]
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder γ]
variable {f : γ → ∀ x, β x}
lemma ωScottContinuous.apply₂ (hf : ωScottContinuous f) (a : α) : ωScottContinuous (f · a) :=
ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hf.monotone h a, fun c ↦ congr_fun (hf.map_ωSup c) a⟩
lemma ωScottContinuous.of_apply₂ (hf : ∀ a, ωScottContinuous (f · a)) : ωScottContinuous f :=
ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨fun _ _ h a ↦ (hf a).monotone h, fun c ↦ by ext a; apply (hf a).map_ωSup c⟩
lemma ωScottContinuous_iff_apply₂ : ωScottContinuous f ↔ ∀ a, ωScottContinuous (f · a) :=
⟨ωScottContinuous.apply₂, ωScottContinuous.of_apply₂⟩
end OmegaCompletePartialOrder
end Pi
namespace Prod
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α]
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder β]
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder γ]
/-- The supremum of a chain in the product `ω`-CPO. -/
@[simps]
protected def ωSup (c : Chain (α × β)) : α × β :=
(ωSup (c.map OrderHom.fst), ωSup (c.map OrderHom.snd))
@[simps! ωSup_fst ωSup_snd]
instance : OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α × β) where
ωSup := Prod.ωSup
ωSup_le := fun _ _ h => ⟨ωSup_le _ _ fun i => (h i).1, ωSup_le _ _ fun i => (h i).2⟩
le_ωSup c i := ⟨le_ωSup (c.map OrderHom.fst) i, le_ωSup (c.map OrderHom.snd) i⟩
theorem ωSup_zip (c₀ : Chain α) (c₁ : Chain β) : ωSup (c₀.zip c₁) = (ωSup c₀, ωSup c₁) := by
apply eq_of_forall_ge_iff; rintro ⟨z₁, z₂⟩
simp [ωSup_le_iff, forall_and]
end Prod
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
namespace CompleteLattice
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Any complete lattice has an `ω`-CPO structure where the countable supremum is a special case
of arbitrary suprema. -/
instance (priority := 100) [CompleteLattice α] : OmegaCompletePartialOrder α where
ωSup c := ⨆ i, c i
ωSup_le := fun ⟨c, _⟩ s hs => by
simp only [iSup_le_iff, OrderHom.coe_mk] at hs ⊢; intro i; apply hs i
le_ωSup := fun ⟨c, _⟩ i => by apply le_iSup_of_le i; rfl
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] [CompleteLattice β] {f g : α → β}
-- TODO Prove this result for `ScottContinuousOn` and deduce this as a special case
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/15412
open Chain in
lemma ωScottContinuous.prodMk (hf : ωScottContinuous f) (hg : ωScottContinuous g) :
ωScottContinuous fun x => (f x, g x) := ScottContinuousOn.prodMk (fun a b hab => by
use pair a b hab; exact range_pair a b hab) hf hg
lemma ωScottContinuous.iSup {f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i, ωScottContinuous (f i)) :
ωScottContinuous (⨆ i, f i) := by
refine ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨Monotone.iSup fun i ↦ (hf i).monotone, fun c ↦ eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a ↦ ?_⟩
simp +contextual [ωSup_le_iff, (hf _).map_ωSup, @forall_swap ι]
lemma ωScottContinuous.sSup {s : Set (α → β)} (hs : ∀ f ∈ s, ωScottContinuous f) :
ωScottContinuous (sSup s) := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup]; exact ωScottContinuous.iSup fun f ↦ ωScottContinuous.iSup <| hs f
lemma ωScottContinuous.sup (hf : ωScottContinuous f) (hg : ωScottContinuous g) :
ωScottContinuous (f ⊔ g) := by
rw [← sSup_pair]
apply ωScottContinuous.sSup
rintro f (rfl | rfl | _) <;> assumption
lemma ωScottContinuous.top : ωScottContinuous (⊤ : α → β) :=
ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨monotone_const, fun c ↦ eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a ↦ by simp⟩
lemma ωScottContinuous.bot : ωScottContinuous (⊥ : α → β) := by
rw [← sSup_empty]; exact ωScottContinuous.sSup (by simp)
end CompleteLattice
namespace CompleteLattice
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] [CompleteLinearOrder β] {f g : α → β}
-- TODO Prove this result for `ScottContinuousOn` and deduce this as a special case
-- Also consider if it holds in greater generality (e.g. finite sets)
-- N.B. The Scott Topology coincides with the Upper Topology on a Complete Linear Order
-- `Topology.IsScott.scott_eq_upper_of_completeLinearOrder`
-- We have that the product topology coincides with the upper topology
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/12133
lemma ωScottContinuous.inf (hf : ωScottContinuous f) (hg : ωScottContinuous g) :
ωScottContinuous (f ⊓ g) := by
refine ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨hf.monotone.inf hg.monotone, fun c ↦ eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Pi.inf_apply, hf.map_ωSup c, hg.map_ωSup c, inf_le_iff, ωSup_le_iff, Chain.map_coe,
Function.comp, OrderHom.coe_mk, ← forall_or_left, ← forall_or_right]
exact ⟨fun h _ ↦ h _ _, fun h i j ↦
(h (max j i)).imp (le_trans <| hf.monotone <| c.mono <| le_max_left _ _)
(le_trans <| hg.monotone <| c.mono <| le_max_right _ _)⟩
end CompleteLattice
namespace OmegaCompletePartialOrder
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] [OmegaCompletePartialOrder β]
variable [OmegaCompletePartialOrder γ] [OmegaCompletePartialOrder δ]
namespace OrderHom
/-- The `ωSup` operator for monotone functions. -/
@[simps]
protected def ωSup (c : Chain (α →o β)) : α →o β where
toFun a := ωSup (c.map (OrderHom.apply a))
monotone' _ _ h := ωSup_le_ωSup_of_le ((Chain.map_le_map _) fun a => a.monotone h)
@[simps! ωSup_coe]
instance omegaCompletePartialOrder : OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α →o β) :=
OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lift OrderHom.coeFnHom OrderHom.ωSup (fun _ _ h => h) fun _ => rfl
end OrderHom
variable (α β) in
/-- A monotone function on `ω`-continuous partial orders is said to be continuous
if for every chain `c : chain α`, `f (⊔ i, c i) = ⊔ i, f (c i)`.
This is just the bundled version of `OrderHom.continuous`. -/
structure ContinuousHom extends OrderHom α β where
/-- The underlying function of a `ContinuousHom` is continuous, i.e. it preserves `ωSup` -/
protected map_ωSup' (c : Chain α) : toFun (ωSup c) = ωSup (c.map toOrderHom)
attribute [nolint docBlame] ContinuousHom.toOrderHom
@[inherit_doc] infixr:25 " →𝒄 " => ContinuousHom -- Input: \r\MIc
instance : FunLike (α →𝒄 β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ h; congr; exact DFunLike.ext' h
instance : OrderHomClass (α →𝒄 β) α β where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.mono h
instance : PartialOrder (α →𝒄 β) :=
(PartialOrder.lift fun f => f.toOrderHom.toFun) <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩ h; congr
namespace ContinuousHom
protected lemma ωScottContinuous (f : α →𝒄 β) : ωScottContinuous f :=
ωScottContinuous.of_map_ωSup_of_orderHom f.map_ωSup'
-- Not a `simp` lemma because in many cases projection is simpler than a generic coercion
theorem toOrderHom_eq_coe (f : α →𝒄 β) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f : α →o β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom (f : α →𝒄 β) : ⇑f.1 = f := rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We specify this explicitly because we don't have a DFunLike
instance.
-/
def Simps.apply (h : α →𝒄 β) : α → β :=
h
initialize_simps_projections ContinuousHom (toFun → apply)
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : α →𝒄 β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
protected theorem congr_arg (f : α →𝒄 β) {x y : α} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg f h
protected theorem monotone (f : α →𝒄 β) : Monotone f :=
f.monotone'
@[mono]
theorem apply_mono {f g : α →𝒄 β} {x y : α} (h₁ : f ≤ g) (h₂ : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ g y :=
OrderHom.apply_mono (show (f : α →o β) ≤ g from h₁) h₂
theorem ωSup_bind {β γ : Type v} (c : Chain α) (f : α →o Part β) (g : α →o β → Part γ) :
ωSup (c.map (f.partBind g)) = ωSup (c.map f) >>= ωSup (c.map g) := by
apply eq_of_forall_ge_iff; intro x
simp only [ωSup_le_iff, Part.bind_le, Chain.mem_map_iff, and_imp, OrderHom.partBind_coe,
exists_imp]
constructor <;> intro h'''
· intro b hb
apply ωSup_le _ _ _
rintro i y hy
simp only [Part.mem_ωSup] at hb
rcases hb with ⟨j, hb⟩
replace hb := hb.symm
simp only [Part.eq_some_iff, Chain.map_coe, Function.comp_apply, OrderHom.apply_coe] at hy hb
replace hb : b ∈ f (c (max i j)) := f.mono (c.mono (le_max_right i j)) _ hb
replace hy : y ∈ g (c (max i j)) b := g.mono (c.mono (le_max_left i j)) _ _ hy
apply h''' (max i j)
simp only [exists_prop, Part.bind_eq_bind, Part.mem_bind_iff, Chain.map_coe,
Function.comp_apply, OrderHom.partBind_coe]
exact ⟨_, hb, hy⟩
· intro i
intro y hy
simp only [exists_prop, Part.bind_eq_bind, Part.mem_bind_iff, Chain.map_coe,
Function.comp_apply, OrderHom.partBind_coe] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨b, hb₀, hb₁⟩
apply h''' b _
· apply le_ωSup (c.map g) _ _ _ hb₁
· apply le_ωSup (c.map f) i _ hb₀
-- TODO: We should move `ωScottContinuous` to the root namespace
lemma ωScottContinuous.bind {β γ} {f : α → Part β} {g : α → β → Part γ} (hf : ωScottContinuous f)
(hg : ωScottContinuous g) : ωScottContinuous fun x ↦ f x >>= g x :=
ωScottContinuous.of_monotone_map_ωSup
⟨hf.monotone.partBind hg.monotone, fun c ↦ by rw [hf.map_ωSup, hg.map_ωSup, ← ωSup_bind]; rfl⟩
lemma ωScottContinuous.map {β γ} {f : β → γ} {g : α → Part β} (hg : ωScottContinuous g) :
ωScottContinuous fun x ↦ f <$> g x := by
simpa only [map_eq_bind_pure_comp] using ωScottContinuous.bind hg ωScottContinuous.const
lemma ωScottContinuous.seq {β γ} {f : α → Part (β → γ)} {g : α → Part β} (hf : ωScottContinuous f)
(hg : ωScottContinuous g) : ωScottContinuous fun x ↦ f x <*> g x := by
simp only [seq_eq_bind_map]
exact ωScottContinuous.bind hf <| ωScottContinuous.of_apply₂ fun _ ↦ ωScottContinuous.map hg
theorem continuous (F : α →𝒄 β) (C : Chain α) : F (ωSup C) = ωSup (C.map F) :=
F.ωScottContinuous.map_ωSup _
/-- Construct a continuous function from a bare function, a continuous function, and a proof that
they are equal. -/
@[simps!]
def copy (f : α → β) (g : α →𝒄 β) (h : f = g) : α →𝒄 β where
toOrderHom := g.1.copy f h
map_ωSup' := by rw [OrderHom.copy_eq]; exact g.map_ωSup'
/-- The identity as a continuous function. -/
@[simps!]
def id : α →𝒄 α := ⟨OrderHom.id, ωScottContinuous.id.map_ωSup⟩
/-- The composition of continuous functions. -/
@[simps!]
def comp (f : β →𝒄 γ) (g : α →𝒄 β) : α →𝒄 γ :=
⟨.comp f.1 g.1, (f.ωScottContinuous.comp g.ωScottContinuous).map_ωSup⟩
@[ext]
protected theorem ext (f g : α →𝒄 β) (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := DFunLike.ext f g h
protected theorem coe_inj (f g : α →𝒄 β) (h : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext' h
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : β →𝒄 γ) : f.comp id = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : β →𝒄 γ) : id.comp f = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : γ →𝒄 δ) (g : β →𝒄 γ) (h : α →𝒄 β) : f.comp (g.comp h) = (f.comp g).comp h :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply (a : α) (f : α →𝒄 β) : (f : α →o β) a = f a :=
rfl
/-- `Function.const` is a continuous function. -/
@[simps!]
def const (x : β) : α →𝒄 β := ⟨.const _ x, ωScottContinuous.const.map_ωSup⟩
instance [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α →𝒄 β) :=
⟨const default⟩
/-- The map from continuous functions to monotone functions is itself a monotone function. -/
@[simps]
def toMono : (α →𝒄 β) →o α →o β where
toFun f := f
monotone' _ _ h := h
/-- When proving that a chain of applications is below a bound `z`, it suffices to consider the
functions and values being selected from the same index in the chains.
This lemma is more specific than necessary, i.e. `c₀` only needs to be a
chain of monotone functions, but it is only used with continuous functions. -/
@[simp]
theorem forall_forall_merge (c₀ : Chain (α →𝒄 β)) (c₁ : Chain α) (z : β) :
(∀ i j : ℕ, (c₀ i) (c₁ j) ≤ z) ↔ ∀ i : ℕ, (c₀ i) (c₁ i) ≤ z := by
constructor <;> introv h
· apply h
· apply le_trans _ (h (max i j))
trans c₀ i (c₁ (max i j))
· apply (c₀ i).monotone
apply c₁.monotone
apply le_max_right
· apply c₀.monotone
apply le_max_left
@[simp]
theorem forall_forall_merge' (c₀ : Chain (α →𝒄 β)) (c₁ : Chain α) (z : β) :
(∀ j i : ℕ, (c₀ i) (c₁ j) ≤ z) ↔ ∀ i : ℕ, (c₀ i) (c₁ i) ≤ z := by
rw [forall_swap, forall_forall_merge]
/-- The `ωSup` operator for continuous functions, which takes the pointwise countable supremum
of the functions in the `ω`-chain. -/
@[simps!]
protected def ωSup (c : Chain (α →𝒄 β)) : α →𝒄 β where
toOrderHom := ωSup <| c.map toMono
map_ωSup' c' := eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a ↦ by simp [(c _).ωScottContinuous.map_ωSup]
@[simps ωSup]
instance : OmegaCompletePartialOrder (α →𝒄 β) :=
OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lift ContinuousHom.toMono ContinuousHom.ωSup
(fun _ _ h => h) (fun _ => rfl)
namespace Prod
/-- The application of continuous functions as a continuous function. -/
@[simps]
def apply : (α →𝒄 β) × α →𝒄 β where
| toFun f := f.1 f.2
monotone' x y h := by
dsimp
trans y.fst x.snd <;> [apply h.1; apply y.1.monotone h.2]
map_ωSup' c := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply ωSup_le
| Mathlib/Order/OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lean | 715 | 721 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions.ComposableArrows
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions.Preadditive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Functor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Localization
/-! # Localization of triangulated categories
If `L : C ⥤ D` is a localization functor for a class of morphisms `W` that is compatible
with the triangulation on the category `C` and admits a left calculus of fractions,
it is shown in this file that `D` can be equipped with a pretriangulated category structure,
and that it is triangulated.
## References
* [Jean-Louis Verdier, *Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes*][verdier1996]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Pretriangulated Localization
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (L : C ⥤ D)
[HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C] [HasZeroObject C]
[∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C]
[HasShift D ℤ] [L.CommShift ℤ]
namespace MorphismProperty
/-- Given `W` is a class of morphisms in a pretriangulated category `C`, this is the condition
that `W` is compatible with the triangulation on `C`. -/
class IsCompatibleWithTriangulation (W : MorphismProperty C) : Prop
extends W.IsCompatibleWithShift ℤ where
compatible_with_triangulation (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(_ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (_ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C)
(a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂) (_ : W a) (_ : W b)
(_ : T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁) :
∃ (c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (_ : W c),
(T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂) ∧ (T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦1⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃)
export IsCompatibleWithTriangulation (compatible_with_triangulation)
end MorphismProperty
namespace Functor
/-- Given a functor `C ⥤ D` from a pretriangulated category, this is the set of
triangles in `D` that are in the essential image of distinguished triangles of `C`. -/
def essImageDistTriang : Set (Triangle D) :=
fun T => ∃ (T' : Triangle C) (_ : T ≅ L.mapTriangle.obj T'), T' ∈ distTriang C
lemma essImageDistTriang_mem_of_iso {T₁ T₂ : Triangle D} (e : T₂ ≅ T₁)
(h : T₁ ∈ L.essImageDistTriang) : T₂ ∈ L.essImageDistTriang := by
obtain ⟨T', e', hT'⟩ := h
exact ⟨T', e ≪≫ e', hT'⟩
lemma contractible_mem_essImageDistTriang [EssSurj L] [HasZeroObject D]
[HasZeroMorphisms D] [L.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (X : D) :
contractibleTriangle X ∈ L.essImageDistTriang := by
refine ⟨contractibleTriangle (L.objPreimage X), ?_, contractible_distinguished _⟩
exact ((contractibleTriangleFunctor D).mapIso (L.objObjPreimageIso X)).symm ≪≫
| Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) L.mapZeroObject.symm (by simp) (by simp) (by simp)
lemma rotate_essImageDistTriang [Preadditive D] [L.Additive]
[∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor D n).Additive] (T : Triangle D) :
T ∈ L.essImageDistTriang ↔ T.rotate ∈ L.essImageDistTriang := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨T', e', hT'⟩
exact ⟨T'.rotate, (rotate D).mapIso e' ≪≫ L.mapTriangleRotateIso.app T',
rot_of_distTriang T' hT'⟩
· rintro ⟨T', e', hT'⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/Triangulated.lean | 68 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Irreducible
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Nilpotent
/-!
# Polynomials over an irreducible ring
This file contains results about the polynomials over an irreducible ring (i.e. a ring with only
one minimal prime ideal, equivalently, whose spectrum is an irreducible topological space).
## Main results
- `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map_of_isPrime_nilradical`: a monic polynomial over
an irreducible ring is irreducible if it is irreducible after mapping into an integral domain.
A generalization to `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map`.
## Tags
polynomial, irreducible ring, nilradical, prime ideal
-/
open Polynomial
noncomputable section
/-- A polynomial over an irreducible ring `R` is irreducible if it is monic and irreducible after
mapping into an integral domain `S` (https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4843432/235999).
A generalization to `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map`. -/
theorem Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map_of_isPrime_nilradical
{R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [(nilradical R).IsPrime] [CommRing S] [IsDomain S]
| (φ : R →+* S) (f : R[X]) (hm : f.Monic) (hi : Irreducible (f.map φ)) : Irreducible f := by
let R' := R ⧸ nilradical R
let ψ : R' →+* S := Ideal.Quotient.lift (nilradical R) φ
(haveI := RingHom.ker_isPrime φ; nilradical_le_prime (RingHom.ker φ))
let ι := algebraMap R R'
rw [show φ = ψ.comp ι from rfl, ← map_map] at hi
replace hi := hm.map ι |>.irreducible_of_irreducible_map _ _ hi
refine ⟨fun h ↦ hi.1 <| (mapRingHom ι).isUnit_map h, fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
wlog hb : IsUnit (b.map ι) generalizing a b
· exact (this b a (mul_comm a b ▸ h)
(hi.2 (by rw [h, Polynomial.map_mul]) |>.resolve_right hb)).symm
have hn (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : IsNilpotent (b.coeff i) := by
obtain ⟨_, _, h⟩ := Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 hb
simpa only [coeff_map, coeff_C, hi, ite_false, ← RingHom.mem_ker,
show RingHom.ker ι = nilradical R from Ideal.mk_ker] using congr(coeff $(h.symm) i)
refine .inr <| isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent (isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_right
(x := a.coeff f.natDegree) <| (IsUnit.neg_iff _).1 ?_) hn
have hc : f.leadingCoeff = _ := congr(coeff $h f.natDegree)
rw [hm, coeff_mul, Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ fun i j ↦ a.coeff i * b.coeff j,
Finset.sum_range_succ, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, Nat.sub_self] at hc
rw [← add_sub_cancel_left 1 (-(_ * _)), ← sub_eq_add_neg, hc]
exact IsNilpotent.isUnit_sub_one <| show _ ∈ nilradical R from sum_mem fun i hi ↦
Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ <| hn _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt (List.mem_range.1 hi)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/IrreducibleRing.lean | 37 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.AddCharacter
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.ZModChar
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard
/-!
# Gauss sums
We define the Gauss sum associated to a multiplicative and an additive
character of a finite field and prove some results about them.
## Main definition
Let `R` be a finite commutative ring and let `R'` be another commutative ring.
If `χ` is a multiplicative character `R → R'` (type `MulChar R R'`) and `ψ`
is an additive character `R → R'` (type `AddChar R R'`, which abbreviates
`(Multiplicative R) →* R'`), then the *Gauss sum* of `χ` and `ψ` is `∑ a, χ a * ψ a`.
## Main results
Some important results are as follows.
* `gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card`: The product of the Gauss
sums of `χ` and `ψ` and that of `χ⁻¹` and `ψ⁻¹` is the cardinality
of the source ring `R` (if `χ` is nontrivial, `ψ` is primitive and `R` is a field).
* `gaussSum_sq`: The square of the Gauss sum is `χ(-1)` times
the cardinality of `R` if in addition `χ` is a quadratic character.
* `MulChar.IsQuadratic.gaussSum_frob`: For a quadratic character `χ`, raising
the Gauss sum to the `p`th power (where `p` is the characteristic of
the target ring `R'`) multiplies it by `χ p`.
* `Char.card_pow_card`: When `F` and `F'` are finite fields and `χ : F → F'`
is a nontrivial quadratic character, then `(χ (-1) * #F)^(#F'/2) = χ #F'`.
* `FiniteField.two_pow_card`: For every finite field `F` of odd characteristic,
we have `2^(#F/2) = χ₈ #F` in `F`.
This machinery can be used to derive (a generalization of) the Law of
Quadratic Reciprocity.
## Tags
additive character, multiplicative character, Gauss sum
-/
universe u v
open AddChar MulChar
section GaussSumDef
-- `R` is the domain of the characters
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [Fintype R]
-- `R'` is the target of the characters
variable {R' : Type v} [CommRing R']
/-!
### Definition and first properties
-/
/-- Definition of the Gauss sum associated to a multiplicative and an additive character. -/
def gaussSum (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') : R' :=
∑ a, χ a * ψ a
/-- Replacing `ψ` by `mulShift ψ a` and multiplying the Gauss sum by `χ a` does not change it. -/
theorem gaussSum_mulShift (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') (a : Rˣ) :
χ a * gaussSum χ (mulShift ψ a) = gaussSum χ ψ := by
simp only [gaussSum, mulShift_apply, Finset.mul_sum]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc, ← map_mul]
exact Fintype.sum_bijective _ a.mulLeft_bijective _ _ fun x ↦ rfl
end GaussSumDef
/-!
### The product of two Gauss sums
-/
section GaussSumProd
open Finset in
/-- A formula for the product of two Gauss sums with the same additive character. -/
lemma gaussSum_mul {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [Fintype R] {R' : Type v} [CommRing R']
(χ φ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') :
gaussSum χ ψ * gaussSum φ ψ = ∑ t : R, ∑ x : R, χ x * φ (t - x) * ψ t := by
rw [gaussSum, gaussSum, sum_mul_sum]
conv => enter [1, 2, x, 2, x_1]; rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
simp only [← ψ.map_add_eq_mul]
have sum_eq x : ∑ y : R, χ x * φ y * ψ (x + y) = ∑ y : R, χ x * φ (y - x) * ψ y := by
rw [sum_bij (fun a _ ↦ a + x)]
· simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left, forall_const]
· simp only [mem_univ, add_left_inj, imp_self, forall_const]
· exact fun b _ ↦ ⟨b - x, mem_univ _, by rw [sub_add_cancel]⟩
· exact fun a _ ↦ by rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_comm]
rw [sum_congr rfl fun x _ ↦ sum_eq x, sum_comm]
-- In the following, we need `R` to be a finite field.
variable {R : Type u} [Field R] [Fintype R] {R' : Type v} [CommRing R']
lemma mul_gaussSum_inv_eq_gaussSum (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') :
χ (-1) * gaussSum χ ψ⁻¹ = gaussSum χ ψ := by
rw [ψ.inv_mulShift, ← Units.coe_neg_one]
exact gaussSum_mulShift χ ψ (-1)
| variable [IsDomain R'] -- From now on, `R'` needs to be a domain.
-- A helper lemma for `gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card` below
-- Is this useful enough in other contexts to be public?
private theorem gaussSum_mul_aux {χ : MulChar R R'} (hχ : χ ≠ 1) (ψ : AddChar R R')
(b : R) :
∑ a, χ (a * b⁻¹) * ψ (a - b) = ∑ c, χ c * ψ (b * (c - 1)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· -- case `b = 0`
simp only [hb, inv_zero, mul_zero, MulChar.map_zero, zero_mul,
Finset.sum_const_zero, map_zero_eq_one, mul_one, χ.sum_eq_zero_of_ne_one hχ]
· -- case `b ≠ 0`
refine (Fintype.sum_bijective _ (mulLeft_bijective₀ b hb) _ _ fun x ↦ ?_).symm
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm x, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hb, one_mul, mul_sub, mul_one]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/GaussSum.lean | 108 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
| simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 686 | 686 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Ruben Van de Velde. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ruben Van de Velde
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# Extending a continuous `ℝ`-linear map to a continuous `𝕜`-linear map
In this file we provide a way to extend a continuous `ℝ`-linear map to a continuous `𝕜`-linear map
in a way that bounds the norm by the norm of the original map, when `𝕜` is either `ℝ` (the
extension is trivial) or `ℂ`. We formulate the extension uniformly, by assuming `RCLike 𝕜`.
We motivate the form of the extension as follows. Note that `fc : F →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜` is determined fully by
`re fc`: for all `x : F`, `fc (I • x) = I * fc x`, so `im (fc x) = -re (fc (I • x))`. Therefore,
given an `fr : F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ`, we define `fc x = fr x - fr (I • x) * I`.
## Main definitions
* `LinearMap.extendTo𝕜`
* `ContinuousLinearMap.extendTo𝕜`
## Implementation details
For convenience, the main definitions above operate in terms of `RestrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 F`.
Alternate forms which operate on `[IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 F]` instead are provided with a primed name.
-/
open RCLike
open ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {F : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module ℝ F] [Module 𝕜 F] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 F]
/-- Extend `fr : F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ` to `F →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜` in a way that will also be continuous and have its norm
bounded by `‖fr‖` if `fr` is continuous. -/
noncomputable def extendTo𝕜' (fr : F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) : F →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜 := by
let fc : F → 𝕜 := fun x => (fr x : 𝕜) - (I : 𝕜) * fr ((I : 𝕜) • x)
have add : ∀ x y : F, fc (x + y) = fc x + fc y := by
intro x y
simp only [fc, smul_add, LinearMap.map_add, ofReal_add]
rw [mul_add]
abel
have A : ∀ (c : ℝ) (x : F), (fr ((c : 𝕜) • x) : 𝕜) = (c : 𝕜) * (fr x : 𝕜) := by
intro c x
rw [← ofReal_mul]
congr 1
rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_assoc, fr.map_smul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_smul]
have smul_ℝ : ∀ (c : ℝ) (x : F), fc ((c : 𝕜) • x) = (c : 𝕜) * fc x := by
intro c x
dsimp only [fc]
rw [A c x, smul_smul, mul_comm I (c : 𝕜), ← smul_smul, A, mul_sub]
ring
have smul_I : ∀ x : F, fc ((I : 𝕜) • x) = (I : 𝕜) * fc x := by
intro x
dsimp only [fc]
rcases @I_mul_I_ax 𝕜 _ with h | h
· simp [h]
rw [mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, smul_smul, h]
simp only [neg_mul, LinearMap.map_neg, one_mul, one_smul, mul_neg, ofReal_neg, neg_smul,
sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
have smul_𝕜 : ∀ (c : 𝕜) (x : F), fc (c • x) = c • fc x := by
intro c x
rw [← re_add_im c, add_smul, add_smul, add, smul_ℝ, ← smul_smul, smul_ℝ, smul_I, ← mul_assoc]
rfl
exact
{ toFun := fc
map_add' := add
map_smul' := smul_𝕜 }
theorem extendTo𝕜'_apply (fr : F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) (x : F) :
fr.extendTo𝕜' x = (fr x : 𝕜) - (I : 𝕜) * (fr ((I : 𝕜) • x) : 𝕜) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem extendTo𝕜'_apply_re (fr : F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) (x : F) : re (fr.extendTo𝕜' x : 𝕜) = fr x := by
simp only [extendTo𝕜'_apply, map_sub, zero_mul, mul_zero, sub_zero,
rclike_simps]
theorem norm_extendTo𝕜'_apply_sq (fr : F →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) (x : F) :
‖(fr.extendTo𝕜' x : 𝕜)‖ ^ 2 = fr (conj (fr.extendTo𝕜' x : 𝕜) • x) :=
calc
‖(fr.extendTo𝕜' x : 𝕜)‖ ^ 2 = re (conj (fr.extendTo𝕜' x) * fr.extendTo𝕜' x : 𝕜) := by
rw [RCLike.conj_mul, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
_ = fr (conj (fr.extendTo𝕜' x : 𝕜) • x) := by
| rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, extendTo𝕜'_apply_re]
end LinearMap
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Extend.lean | 93 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Impartial
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Nimber.Basic
/-!
# Nim and the Sprague-Grundy theorem
This file contains the definition for nim for any ordinal `o`. In the game of `nim o₁` both players
may move to `nim o₂` for any `o₂ < o₁`.
We also define a Grundy value for an impartial game `G` and prove the Sprague-Grundy theorem, that
`G` is equivalent to `nim (grundyValue G)`.
Finally, we prove that the grundy value of a sum `G + H` corresponds to the nimber sum of the
individual grundy values.
## Implementation details
The pen-and-paper definition of nim defines the possible moves of `nim o` to be `Set.Iio o`.
However, this definition does not work for us because it would make the type of nim
`Ordinal.{u} → SetTheory.PGame.{u + 1}`, which would make it impossible for us to state the
Sprague-Grundy theorem, since that requires the type of `nim` to be
`Ordinal.{u} → SetTheory.PGame.{u}`. For this reason, we instead use `o.toType` for the possible
moves. We expose `toLeftMovesNim` and `toRightMovesNim` to conveniently convert an ordinal less than
`o` into a left or right move of `nim o`, and vice versa.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
open Ordinal Nimber
namespace PGame
/-- The definition of single-heap nim, which can be viewed as a pile of stones where each player can
take a positive number of stones from it on their turn. -/
noncomputable def nim (o : Ordinal.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
⟨o.toType, o.toType,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val⟩
termination_by o
decreasing_by all_goals exact ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).prop
@[deprecated "you can use `rw [nim]` directly" (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem nim_def (o : Ordinal) : nim o =
⟨o.toType, o.toType,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val,
fun x => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val⟩ := by
rw [nim]
theorem leftMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).LeftMoves = o.toType := by rw [nim]; rfl
theorem rightMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).RightMoves = o.toType := by rw [nim]; rfl
theorem moveLeft_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
HEq (nim o).moveLeft fun i : o.toType => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm i) := by rw [nim]; rfl
theorem moveRight_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
HEq (nim o).moveRight fun i : o.toType => nim ((enumIsoToType o).symm i) := by rw [nim]; rfl
/-- Turns an ordinal less than `o` into a left move for `nim o` and vice versa. -/
noncomputable def toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).LeftMoves :=
(enumIsoToType o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (leftMoves_nim o).symm)
/-- Turns an ordinal less than `o` into a right move for `nim o` and vice versa. -/
noncomputable def toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).RightMoves :=
(enumIsoToType o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (rightMoves_nim o).symm)
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves) :
toLeftMovesNim.symm i < o :=
(toLeftMovesNim.symm i).prop
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).RightMoves) :
toRightMovesNim.symm i < o :=
(toRightMovesNim.symm i).prop
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveLeft i = nim (toLeftMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveLeft_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
@[deprecated moveLeft_nim (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias moveLeft_nim' := moveLeft_nim
theorem moveLeft_toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} (i) :
(nim o).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNim i) = nim i := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight i = nim (toRightMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveRight_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
@[deprecated moveRight_nim (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias moveRight_nim' := moveRight_nim
theorem moveRight_toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} (i) :
(nim o).moveRight (toRightMovesNim i) = nim i := by
simp
/-- A recursion principle for left moves of a nim game. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def leftMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).LeftMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toLeftMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
/-- A recursion principle for right moves of a nim game. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def rightMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).RightMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).RightMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toRightMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toRightMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).LeftMoves := by
rw [nim]
exact isEmpty_toType_zero
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).RightMoves := by
rw [nim]
exact isEmpty_toType_zero
/-- `nim 0` has exactly the same moves as `0`. -/
def nimZeroRelabelling : nim 0 ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
theorem nim_zero_equiv : nim 0 ≈ 0 :=
Equiv.isEmpty _
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneLeftMoves : Unique (nim 1).LeftMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| leftMoves_nim 1).unique
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneRightMoves : Unique (nim 1).RightMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| rightMoves_nim 1).unique
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_leftMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).LeftMoves) = @toLeftMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_rightMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).RightMoves) = @toRightMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toLeftMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toRightMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem nim_one_moveLeft (x) : (nim 1).moveLeft x = nim 0 := by simp
theorem nim_one_moveRight (x) : (nim 1).moveRight x = nim 0 := by simp
/-- `nim 1` has exactly the same moves as `star`. -/
def nimOneRelabelling : nim 1 ≡r star := by
rw [nim]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun i => ?_, fun j => ?_⟩
any_goals dsimp; apply Equiv.ofUnique
all_goals simpa [enumIsoToType] using nimZeroRelabelling
theorem nim_one_equiv : nim 1 ≈ star :=
nimOneRelabelling.equiv
@[simp]
theorem nim_birthday (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).birthday = o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim, birthday_def]
dsimp
rw [max_eq_right le_rfl]
convert lsub_typein o with i
exact IH _ (typein_lt_self i)
@[simp]
theorem neg_nim (o : Ordinal) : -nim o = nim o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim]; dsimp; congr <;> funext i <;> exact IH _ (Ordinal.typein_lt_self i)
instance impartial_nim (o : Ordinal) : Impartial (nim o) := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [impartial_def, neg_nim]
refine ⟨equiv_rfl, fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩ <;> simpa using IH _ (typein_lt_self _)
theorem nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : nim o ‖ 0 := by
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_lf, lf_zero_le]
use toRightMovesNim ⟨0, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho⟩
simp
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_equiv_zero_iff (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : (nim o₁ + nim o₂ ≈ 0) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
constructor
· refine not_imp_not.1 fun hne : _ ≠ _ => (Impartial.not_equiv_zero_iff (nim o₁ + nim o₂)).2 ?_
wlog h : o₁ < o₂
· exact (fuzzy_congr_left add_comm_equiv).1 (this _ _ hne.symm (hne.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h))
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_gf, zero_lf_le]
| use toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inr <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨_, h⟩)
· simpa using (Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)).2
· rintro rfl
exact Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : nim o₁ + nim o₂ ‖ 0 ↔ o₁ ≠ o₂ := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Nim.lean | 206 | 212 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2.Init
/-!
# The symmetric square
This file defines the symmetric square, which is `α × α` modulo
swapping. This is also known as the type of unordered pairs.
More generally, the symmetric square is the second symmetric power
(see `Data.Sym.Basic`). The equivalence is `Sym2.equivSym`.
From the point of view that an unordered pair is equivalent to a
multiset of cardinality two (see `Sym2.equivMultiset`), there is a
`Mem` instance `Sym2.Mem`, which is a `Prop`-valued membership
test. Given `h : a ∈ z` for `z : Sym2 α`, then `Mem.other h` is the other
element of the pair, defined using `Classical.choice`. If `α` has
decidable equality, then `h.other'` computably gives the other element.
The universal property of `Sym2` is provided as `Sym2.lift`, which
states that functions from `Sym2 α` are equivalent to symmetric
two-argument functions from `α`.
Recall that an undirected graph (allowing self loops, but no multiple
edges) is equivalent to a symmetric relation on the vertex type `α`.
Given a symmetric relation on `α`, the corresponding edge set is
constructed by `Sym2.fromRel` which is a special case of `Sym2.lift`.
## Notation
The element `Sym2.mk (a, b)` can be written as `s(a, b)` for short.
## Tags
symmetric square, unordered pairs, symmetric powers
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Finset Function Sym
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Sym2
/-- This is the relation capturing the notion of pairs equivalent up to permutations. -/
@[aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2]) [safe [constructors, cases], norm]]
inductive Rel (α : Type u) : α × α → α × α → Prop
| refl (x y : α) : Rel _ (x, y) (x, y)
| swap (x y : α) : Rel _ (x, y) (y, x)
attribute [refl] Rel.refl
@[symm]
theorem Rel.symm {x y : α × α} : Rel α x y → Rel α y x := by aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
@[trans]
theorem Rel.trans {x y z : α × α} (a : Rel α x y) (b : Rel α y z) : Rel α x z := by
aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
theorem Rel.is_equivalence : Equivalence (Rel α) :=
{ refl := fun (x, y) ↦ Rel.refl x y, symm := Rel.symm, trans := Rel.trans }
/-- One can use `attribute [local instance] Sym2.Rel.setoid` to temporarily
make `Quotient` functionality work for `α × α`. -/
def Rel.setoid (α : Type u) : Setoid (α × α) :=
⟨Rel α, Rel.is_equivalence⟩
@[simp]
theorem rel_iff' {p q : α × α} : Rel α p q ↔ p = q ∨ p = q.swap := by
aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
theorem rel_iff {x y z w : α} : Rel α (x, y) (z, w) ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp
end Sym2
/-- `Sym2 α` is the symmetric square of `α`, which, in other words, is the
type of unordered pairs.
It is equivalent in a natural way to multisets of cardinality 2 (see
`Sym2.equivMultiset`).
-/
abbrev Sym2 (α : Type u) := Quot (Sym2.Rel α)
/-- Constructor for `Sym2`. This is the quotient map `α × α → Sym2 α`. -/
protected abbrev Sym2.mk {α : Type*} (p : α × α) : Sym2 α := Quot.mk (Sym2.Rel α) p
/-- `s(x, y)` is an unordered pair,
which is to say a pair modulo the action of the symmetric group.
It is equal to `Sym2.mk (x, y)`. -/
notation3 "s(" x ", " y ")" => Sym2.mk (x, y)
namespace Sym2
protected theorem sound {p p' : α × α} (h : Sym2.Rel α p p') : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk p' :=
Quot.sound h
protected theorem exact {p p' : α × α} (h : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk p') : Sym2.Rel α p p' :=
Quotient.exact (s := Sym2.Rel.setoid α) h
@[simp]
protected theorem eq {p p' : α × α} : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk p' ↔ Sym2.Rel α p p' :=
Quotient.eq' (s₁ := Sym2.Rel.setoid α)
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator, induction_eliminator]
protected theorem ind {f : Sym2 α → Prop} (h : ∀ x y, f s(x, y)) : ∀ i, f i :=
Quot.ind <| Prod.rec <| h
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn {f : Sym2 α → Prop} (i : Sym2 α) (hf : ∀ x y, f s(x, y)) : f i :=
i.ind hf
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn₂ {f : Sym2 α → Sym2 β → Prop} (i : Sym2 α) (j : Sym2 β)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, f s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂)) : f i j :=
Quot.induction_on₂ i j <| by
intro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
exact hf _ _ _ _
/-- Dependent recursion principal for `Sym2`. See `Quot.rec`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec {motive : Sym2 α → Sort*}
(f : (p : α × α) → motive (Sym2.mk p))
(h : (p q : α × α) → (h : Sym2.Rel α p q) → Eq.ndrec (f p) (Sym2.sound h) = f q)
(z : Sym2 α) : motive z :=
Quot.rec f h z
/-- Dependent recursion principal for `Sym2` when the target is a `Subsingleton` type.
See `Quot.recOnSubsingleton`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected abbrev recOnSubsingleton {motive : Sym2 α → Sort*}
[(p : α × α) → Subsingleton (motive (Sym2.mk p))]
(z : Sym2 α) (f : (p : α × α) → motive (Sym2.mk p)) : motive z :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton z f
protected theorem «exists» {α : Sort _} {f : Sym2 α → Prop} :
(∃ x : Sym2 α, f x) ↔ ∃ x y, f s(x, y) :=
Quot.mk_surjective.exists.trans Prod.exists
protected theorem «forall» {α : Sort _} {f : Sym2 α → Prop} :
(∀ x : Sym2 α, f x) ↔ ∀ x y, f s(x, y) :=
Quot.mk_surjective.forall.trans Prod.forall
theorem eq_swap {a b : α} : s(a, b) = s(b, a) := Quot.sound (Rel.swap _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mk_prod_swap_eq {p : α × α} : Sym2.mk p.swap = Sym2.mk p := by
cases p
exact eq_swap
theorem congr_right {a b c : α} : s(a, b) = s(a, c) ↔ b = c := by
simp +contextual
theorem congr_left {a b c : α} : s(b, a) = s(c, a) ↔ b = c := by
simp +contextual
theorem eq_iff {x y z w : α} : s(x, y) = s(z, w) ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff {p q : α × α} : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk q ↔ p = q ∨ p = q.swap := by
cases p
cases q
simp only [eq_iff, Prod.mk_inj, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
/-- The universal property of `Sym2`; symmetric functions of two arguments are equivalent to
functions from `Sym2`. Note that when `β` is `Prop`, it can sometimes be more convenient to use
`Sym2.fromRel` instead. -/
def lift : { f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁ } ≃ (Sym2 α → β) where
toFun f :=
Quot.lift (uncurry ↑f) <| by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
exacts [rfl, f.prop _ _]
invFun F := ⟨curry (F ∘ Sym2.mk), fun _ _ => congr_arg F eq_swap⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := funext <| Sym2.ind fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk (f : { f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁ }) (a₁ a₂ : α) :
lift f s(a₁, a₂) = (f : α → α → β) a₁ a₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_lift_symm_apply (F : Sym2 α → β) (a₁ a₂ : α) :
(lift.symm F : α → α → β) a₁ a₂ = F s(a₁, a₂) :=
rfl
/-- A two-argument version of `Sym2.lift`. -/
def lift₂ :
{ f : α → α → β → β → γ //
∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₂ a₁ b₁ b₂ ∧ f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₁ a₂ b₂ b₁ } ≃
(Sym2 α → Sym2 β → γ) where
toFun f :=
Quotient.lift₂ (s₁ := Sym2.Rel.setoid α) (s₂ := Sym2.Rel.setoid β)
(fun (a : α × α) (b : β × β) => f.1 a.1 a.2 b.1 b.2)
(by
rintro _ _ _ _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exacts [rfl, (f.2 _ _ _ _).2, (f.2 _ _ _ _).1, (f.2 _ _ _ _).1.trans (f.2 _ _ _ _).2])
invFun F :=
⟨fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => F s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂), fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => by
constructor
exacts [congr_arg₂ F eq_swap rfl, congr_arg₂ F rfl eq_swap]⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := funext₂ fun a b => Sym2.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift₂_mk
(f :
{ f : α → α → β → β → γ //
∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₂ a₁ b₁ b₂ ∧ f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₁ a₂ b₂ b₁ })
(a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) : lift₂ f s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂) = (f : α → α → β → β → γ) a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_lift₂_symm_apply (F : Sym2 α → Sym2 β → γ) (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
(lift₂.symm F : α → α → β → β → γ) a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = F s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂) :=
rfl
/-- The functor `Sym2` is functorial, and this function constructs the induced maps.
-/
def map (f : α → β) : Sym2 α → Sym2 β :=
Quot.map (Prod.map f f)
(by intro _ _ h; cases h <;> constructor)
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (@id α) = id := by
ext ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
rfl
theorem map_comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} : Sym2.map (g ∘ f) = Sym2.map g ∘ Sym2.map f := by
ext ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
rfl
theorem map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (x : Sym2 α) : map g (map f x) = map (g ∘ f) x := by
induction x; aesop
@[simp]
theorem map_pair_eq (f : α → β) (x y : α) : map f s(x, y) = s(f x, f y) :=
rfl
theorem map.injective {f : α → β} (hinj : Injective f) : Injective (map f) := by
intro z z'
refine Sym2.inductionOn₂ z z' (fun x y x' y' => ?_)
simp [hinj.eq_iff]
/-- `mk a` as an embedding. This is the symmetric version of `Function.Embedding.sectL`. -/
@[simps]
def mkEmbedding (a : α) : α ↪ Sym2 α where
toFun b := s(a, b)
inj' b₁ b₁ h := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h
obtain rfl | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h <;> rfl
/-- `Sym2.map` as an embedding. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.Function.Embedding.sym2Map (f : α ↪ β) : Sym2 α ↪ Sym2 β where
toFun := map f
inj' := map.injective f.injective
lemma lift_comp_map {g : γ → α} (f : {f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁}) :
lift f ∘ map g = lift ⟨fun (c₁ c₂ : γ) => f.val (g c₁) (g c₂), fun _ _ => f.prop _ _⟩ :=
lift.symm_apply_eq.mp rfl
lemma lift_map_apply {g : γ → α} (f : {f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁}) (p : Sym2 γ) :
lift f (map g p) = lift ⟨fun (c₁ c₂ : γ) => f.val (g c₁) (g c₂), fun _ _ => f.prop _ _⟩ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← lift_comp_map, comp_apply]
section Membership
/-! ### Membership and set coercion -/
/-- This is a predicate that determines whether a given term is a member of a term of the
symmetric square. From this point of view, the symmetric square is the subtype of
cardinality-two multisets on `α`.
-/
protected def Mem (x : α) (z : Sym2 α) : Prop :=
∃ y : α, z = s(x, y)
@[aesop norm (rule_sets := [Sym2])]
theorem mem_iff' {a b c : α} : Sym2.Mem a s(b, c) ↔ a = b ∨ a = c :=
{ mp := by
rintro ⟨_, h⟩
rw [eq_iff] at h
aesop
mpr := by
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
rw [eq_swap]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩ }
instance : SetLike (Sym2 α) α where
coe z := { x | z.Mem x }
coe_injective' z z' h := by
simp only [Set.ext_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at h
obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
obtain ⟨x', y'⟩ := z'
have hx := h x; have hy := h y; have hx' := h x'; have hy' := h y'
simp only [mem_iff', eq_self_iff_true] at hx hy hx' hy'
aesop
@[simp]
theorem mem_iff_mem {x : α} {z : Sym2 α} : Sym2.Mem x z ↔ x ∈ z :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_iff_exists {x : α} {z : Sym2 α} : x ∈ z ↔ ∃ y : α, z = s(x, y) :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Sym2 α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ p ↔ x ∈ q) : p = q :=
SetLike.ext h
theorem mem_mk_left (x y : α) : x ∈ s(x, y) :=
⟨y, rfl⟩
theorem mem_mk_right (x y : α) : y ∈ s(x, y) :=
eq_swap ▸ mem_mk_left y x
@[simp, aesop norm (rule_sets := [Sym2])]
theorem mem_iff {a b c : α} : a ∈ s(b, c) ↔ a = b ∨ a = c :=
mem_iff'
theorem out_fst_mem (e : Sym2 α) : e.out.1 ∈ e :=
⟨e.out.2, by rw [Sym2.mk, e.out_eq]⟩
theorem out_snd_mem (e : Sym2 α) : e.out.2 ∈ e :=
⟨e.out.1, by rw [eq_swap, Sym2.mk, e.out_eq]⟩
theorem ball {p : α → Prop} {a b : α} : (∀ c ∈ s(a, b), p c) ↔ p a ∧ p b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h _ <| mem_mk_left _ _, h _ <| mem_mk_right _ _⟩, fun h c hc => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | rfl := Sym2.mem_iff.1 hc
· exact h.1
· exact h.2
/-- Given an element of the unordered pair, give the other element using `Classical.choose`.
See also `Mem.other'` for the computable version.
-/
noncomputable def Mem.other {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : α :=
Classical.choose h
@[simp]
theorem other_spec {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : s(a, Mem.other h) = z := by
erw [← Classical.choose_spec h]
theorem other_mem {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : Mem.other h ∈ z := by
convert mem_mk_right a <| Mem.other h
rw [other_spec h]
theorem mem_and_mem_iff {x y : α} {z : Sym2 α} (hne : x ≠ y) : x ∈ z ∧ y ∈ z ↔ z = s(x, y) := by
constructor
· cases z
rw [mem_iff, mem_iff]
aesop
· rintro rfl
simp
theorem eq_of_ne_mem {x y : α} {z z' : Sym2 α} (h : x ≠ y) (h1 : x ∈ z) (h2 : y ∈ z) (h3 : x ∈ z')
(h4 : y ∈ z') : z = z' :=
((mem_and_mem_iff h).mp ⟨h1, h2⟩).trans ((mem_and_mem_iff h).mp ⟨h3, h4⟩).symm
instance Mem.decidable [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (z : Sym2 α) : Decidable (x ∈ z) :=
z.recOnSubsingleton fun ⟨_, _⟩ => decidable_of_iff' _ mem_iff
end Membership
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {z : Sym2 α} : b ∈ Sym2.map f z ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ z ∧ f a = b := by
cases z
simp only [map_pair_eq, mem_iff, exists_eq_or_imp, exists_eq_left]
aesop
@[congr]
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Sym2 α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) : map f s = map g s := by
ext y
simp only [mem_map]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨w, hw, rfl⟩
exact ⟨w, hw, by simp [hw, h]⟩
/-- Note: `Sym2.map_id` will not simplify `Sym2.map id z` due to `Sym2.map_congr`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : (map fun x : α => x) = id :=
map_id
/--
Partial map. If `f : ∀ a, p a → β` is a partial function defined on `a : α` satisfying `p`,
then `pmap f s h` is essentially the same as `map f s` but is defined only when all members of `s`
satisfy `p`, using the proof to apply `f`.
-/
def pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, P a → β) (s : Sym2 α) : (∀ a ∈ s, P a) → Sym2 β :=
let g (p : α × α) (H : ∀ a ∈ Sym2.mk p, P a) : Sym2 β :=
s(f p.1 (H p.1 <| mem_mk_left _ _), f p.2 (H p.2 <| mem_mk_right _ _))
Quot.recOn s g fun p q hpq => funext fun Hq => by
rw [rel_iff'] at hpq
have Hp : ∀ a ∈ Sym2.mk p, P a := fun a hmem =>
Hq a (Sym2.mk_eq_mk_iff.2 hpq ▸ hmem : a ∈ Sym2.mk q)
have h : ∀ {s₂ e H}, Eq.ndrec (motive := fun s => (∀ a ∈ s, P a) → Sym2 β) (g p) (b := s₂) e H =
g p Hp := by
rintro s₂ rfl _
rfl
refine h.trans (Quot.sound ?_)
rw [rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
apply hpq.imp <;> rintro rfl <;> simp
theorem forall_mem_pair {P : α → Prop} {a b : α} : (∀ x ∈ s(a, b), P x) ↔ P a ∧ P b := by
simp only [mem_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, forall_eq]
lemma pair_eq_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, P a → β) (a b : α) (h : P a) (h' : P b) :
s(f a h, f b h') = pmap f s(a, b) (forall_mem_pair.mpr ⟨h, h'⟩) := rfl
lemma pmap_pair {P : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, P a → β) (a b : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ s(a, b), P x) :
pmap f s(a, b) h = s(f a (h a (mem_mk_left a b)), f b (h b (mem_mk_right a b))) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_pmap_iff {P : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, P a → β) (z : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ a ∈ z, P a) (b : β) :
b ∈ z.pmap f h ↔ ∃ (a : α) (ha : a ∈ z), b = f a (h a ha) := by
obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rw [pmap_pair f x y h]
aesop
lemma pmap_eq_map {P : α → Prop} (f : α → β) (z : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ a ∈ z, P a) :
z.pmap (fun a _ => f a) h = z.map f := by
cases z; rfl
lemma map_pmap {Q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (g : ∀ b, Q b → γ) (z : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ b ∈ z.map f, Q b):
(z.map f).pmap g h =
z.pmap (fun a ha => g (f a) (h (f a) (mem_map.mpr ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩))) (fun _ ha => ha) := by
cases z; rfl
lemma pmap_map {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} (f : ∀ a, P a → β) (g : β → γ)
(z : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ a ∈ z, P a) (h' : ∀ b ∈ z.pmap f h, Q b) :
(z.pmap f h).map g = z.pmap (fun a ha => g (f a (h a ha))) (fun _ ha ↦ ha) := by
cases z; rfl
lemma pmap_pmap {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} (f : ∀ a, P a → β) (g : ∀ b, Q b → γ)
(z : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ a ∈ z, P a) (h' : ∀ b ∈ z.pmap f h, Q b) :
(z.pmap f h).pmap g h' = z.pmap (fun a ha => g (f a (h a ha))
(h' _ ((mem_pmap_iff f z h _).mpr ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩))) (fun _ ha ↦ ha) := by
cases z; rfl
@[simp]
lemma pmap_subtype_map_subtypeVal {P : α → Prop} (s : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, P a) :
(s.pmap Subtype.mk h).map Subtype.val = s := by
cases s; rfl
/--
"Attach" a proof `P a` that holds for all the elements of `s` to produce a new Sym2 object
with the same elements but in the type `{x // P x}`.
-/
def attachWith {P : α → Prop} (s : Sym2 α) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, P a) : Sym2 {a // P a} :=
pmap Subtype.mk s h
@[simp]
lemma attachWith_map_subtypeVal {s : Sym2 α} {P : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, P a) :
(s.attachWith h).map Subtype.val = s := by
cases s; rfl
/-! ### Diagonal -/
variable {e : Sym2 α} {f : α → β}
/-- A type `α` is naturally included in the diagonal of `α × α`, and this function gives the image
of this diagonal in `Sym2 α`.
-/
def diag (x : α) : Sym2 α := s(x, x)
theorem diag_injective : Function.Injective (Sym2.diag : α → Sym2 α) := fun x y h => by
cases Sym2.exact h <;> rfl
/-- A predicate for testing whether an element of `Sym2 α` is on the diagonal.
-/
def IsDiag : Sym2 α → Prop :=
lift ⟨Eq, fun _ _ => propext eq_comm⟩
theorem mk_isDiag_iff {x y : α} : IsDiag s(x, y) ↔ x = y :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_iff_proj_eq (z : α × α) : IsDiag (Sym2.mk z) ↔ z.1 = z.2 :=
Prod.recOn z fun _ _ => mk_isDiag_iff
protected lemma IsDiag.map : e.IsDiag → (e.map f).IsDiag := Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ congr_arg f) e
lemma isDiag_map (hf : Injective f) : (e.map f).IsDiag ↔ e.IsDiag :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ hf.eq_iff) e
@[simp]
theorem diag_isDiag (a : α) : IsDiag (diag a) :=
Eq.refl a
theorem IsDiag.mem_range_diag {z : Sym2 α} : IsDiag z → z ∈ Set.range (@diag α) := by
obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro (rfl : x = y)
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem isDiag_iff_mem_range_diag (z : Sym2 α) : IsDiag z ↔ z ∈ Set.range (@diag α) :=
⟨IsDiag.mem_range_diag, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => hi ▸ diag_isDiag i⟩
instance IsDiag.decidablePred (α : Type u) [DecidableEq α] : DecidablePred (@IsDiag α) :=
fun z => z.recOnSubsingleton fun a => decidable_of_iff' _ (isDiag_iff_proj_eq a)
theorem other_ne {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (hd : ¬IsDiag z) (h : a ∈ z) : Mem.other h ≠ a := by
contrapose! hd
have h' := Sym2.other_spec h
rw [hd] at h'
rw [← h']
simp
section Relations
/-! ### Declarations about symmetric relations -/
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
/-- Symmetric relations define a set on `Sym2 α` by taking all those pairs
of elements that are related.
-/
def fromRel (sym : Symmetric r) : Set (Sym2 α) :=
setOf (lift ⟨r, fun _ _ => propext ⟨(sym ·), (sym ·)⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem fromRel_proj_prop {sym : Symmetric r} {z : α × α} : Sym2.mk z ∈ fromRel sym ↔ r z.1 z.2 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fromRel_prop {sym : Symmetric r} {a b : α} : s(a, b) ∈ fromRel sym ↔ r a b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fromRel_bot : fromRel (fun (_ _ : α) z => z : Symmetric ⊥) = ∅ := by
apply Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun e => _
apply Sym2.ind
simp [-Set.bot_eq_empty, Prop.bot_eq_false]
theorem fromRel_top : fromRel (fun (_ _ : α) z => z : Symmetric ⊤) = Set.univ := by
apply Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun e => _
apply Sym2.ind
simp [-Set.top_eq_univ, Prop.top_eq_true]
theorem fromRel_ne : fromRel (fun (_ _ : α) z => z.symm : Symmetric Ne) = {z | ¬IsDiag z} := by
ext z; exact z.ind (by simp)
theorem fromRel_irreflexive {sym : Symmetric r} :
Irreflexive r ↔ ∀ {z}, z ∈ fromRel sym → ¬IsDiag z :=
{ mp := by intro h; apply Sym2.ind; aesop
mpr := fun h _ hr => h (fromRel_prop.mpr hr) rfl }
theorem mem_fromRel_irrefl_other_ne {sym : Symmetric r} (irrefl : Irreflexive r) {a : α}
{z : Sym2 α} (hz : z ∈ fromRel sym) (h : a ∈ z) : Mem.other h ≠ a :=
other_ne (fromRel_irreflexive.mp irrefl hz) h
instance fromRel.decidablePred (sym : Symmetric r) [h : DecidableRel r] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ Sym2.fromRel sym) := fun z => z.recOnSubsingleton fun _ => h _ _
lemma fromRel_relationMap {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Symmetric r) (f : α → β) :
fromRel (Relation.map_symmetric hr f) = Sym2.map f '' Sym2.fromRel hr := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp only [fromRel_proj_prop, Relation.Map, Set.mem_image, Sym2.exists, map_pair_eq, Sym2.eq,
rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk, and_or_left, exists_or, iff_self_or,
forall_exists_index, and_imp]
exact fun c d hcd hc hd ↦ ⟨d, c, hr hcd, hd, hc⟩
/-- The inverse to `Sym2.fromRel`. Given a set on `Sym2 α`, give a symmetric relation on `α`
(see `Sym2.toRel_symmetric`). -/
def ToRel (s : Set (Sym2 α)) (x y : α) : Prop :=
s(x, y) ∈ s
@[simp]
theorem toRel_prop (s : Set (Sym2 α)) (x y : α) : ToRel s x y ↔ s(x, y) ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem toRel_symmetric (s : Set (Sym2 α)) : Symmetric (ToRel s) := fun x y => by simp [eq_swap]
theorem toRel_fromRel (sym : Symmetric r) : ToRel (fromRel sym) = r :=
rfl
theorem fromRel_toRel (s : Set (Sym2 α)) : fromRel (toRel_symmetric s) = s :=
Set.ext fun z => Sym2.ind (fun _ _ => Iff.rfl) z
end Relations
section SymEquiv
/-! ### Equivalence to the second symmetric power -/
attribute [local instance] List.Vector.Perm.isSetoid
private def fromVector : List.Vector α 2 → α × α
| ⟨[a, b], _⟩ => (a, b)
private theorem perm_card_two_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} :
[a₁, b₁].Perm [a₂, b₂] ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ a₁ = b₂ ∧ b₁ = a₂ :=
{ mp := by
simp only [← Multiset.coe_eq_coe, ← Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.coe_nil, Multiset.cons_zero,
Multiset.cons_eq_cons, Multiset.singleton_inj, ne_eq, Multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff,
exists_eq_right_right, and_true]
tauto
mpr := fun
| .inl ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | .inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [h₁, h₂]
first | done | apply List.Perm.swap'; rfl }
/-- The symmetric square is equivalent to length-2 vectors up to permutations. -/
def sym2EquivSym' : Equiv (Sym2 α) (Sym' α 2) where
toFun :=
Quot.map (fun x : α × α => ⟨[x.1, x.2], rfl⟩)
(by
rintro _ _ ⟨_⟩
· constructor; apply List.Perm.refl
apply List.Perm.swap'
rfl)
invFun :=
Quot.map fromVector
(by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h
rcases x with - | ⟨_, x⟩; · simp at hx
rcases x with - | ⟨_, x⟩; · simp at hx
rcases x with - | ⟨_, x⟩; swap
· exfalso
simp at hx
rcases y with - | ⟨_, y⟩; · simp at hy
rcases y with - | ⟨_, y⟩; · simp at hy
rcases y with - | ⟨_, y⟩; swap
· exfalso
simp at hy
rcases perm_card_two_iff.mp h with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
apply Sym2.Rel.swap)
left_inv := by apply Sym2.ind; aesop (add norm unfold [Sym2.fromVector])
right_inv x := by
refine x.recOnSubsingleton fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
obtain - | ⟨-, x⟩ := x
· simp at hx
rcases x with - | ⟨_, x⟩
· simp at hx
rcases x with - | ⟨_, x⟩
swap
· exfalso
simp at hx
rfl
/-- The symmetric square is equivalent to the second symmetric power. -/
def equivSym (α : Type*) : Sym2 α ≃ Sym α 2 :=
Equiv.trans sym2EquivSym' symEquivSym'.symm
/-- The symmetric square is equivalent to multisets of cardinality
two. (This is currently a synonym for `equivSym`, but it's provided
in case the definition for `Sym` changes.) -/
def equivMultiset (α : Type*) : Sym2 α ≃ { s : Multiset α // Multiset.card s = 2 } :=
equivSym α
end SymEquiv
section Decidable
/-- Given `[DecidableEq α]` and `[Fintype α]`, the following instance gives `Fintype (Sym2 α)`.
-/
instance instDecidableRel [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (Rel α) :=
fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ rel_iff
section
attribute [local instance] Sym2.Rel.setoid
instance instDecidableRel' [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (HasEquiv.Equiv (α := α × α)) :=
instDecidableRel
end
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Sym2 α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq (Quotient (Sym2.Rel.setoid α))
/-! ### The other element of an element of the symmetric square -/
/--
A function that gives the other element of a pair given one of the elements. Used in `Mem.other'`.
-/
@[aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [Sym2])]
private def pairOther [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (z : α × α) : α :=
if a = z.1 then z.2 else z.1
/-- Get the other element of the unordered pair using the decidable equality.
This is the computable version of `Mem.other`. -/
@[aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [Sym2])]
def Mem.other' [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : α :=
Sym2.rec (fun s _ => pairOther a s) (by
clear h z
intro x y h
ext hy
convert_to Sym2.pairOther a x = _
· have : ∀ {c e h}, @Eq.ndrec (Sym2 α) (Sym2.mk x)
(fun x => a ∈ x → α) (fun _ => Sym2.pairOther a x) c e h = Sym2.pairOther a x := by
intro _ e _; subst e; rfl
apply this
· rw [mem_iff] at hy
aesop (add norm unfold [pairOther]))
z h
@[simp]
theorem other_spec' [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) : s(a, Mem.other' h) = z := by
induction z
| have h' := mem_iff.mp h
aesop (add norm unfold [Sym2.rec, Quot.rec]) (rule_sets := [Sym2])
@[simp]
theorem other_eq_other' [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {z : Sym2 α} (h : a ∈ z) :
Mem.other h = Mem.other' h := by rw [← congr_right, other_spec' h, other_spec]
| Mathlib/Data/Sym/Sym2.lean | 716 | 721 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Basic
/-!
# Non-unital Subalgebras over Commutative Semirings
In this file we define `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
universe u u' v v' w w'
section NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
variable {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- Embedding of a non-unital subalgebra into the non-unital algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype s, SMulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = ((↑) : s → A) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that is also a submodule. -/
structure NonUnitalSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubsemiring A, Submodule R A
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `Submodule`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and `SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem := @fun s => s.smul_mem'
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubsemiring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubsemiring A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = U.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff
theorem mem_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) {x} : x ∈ S.toSubmodule ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubmodule : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Submodule R A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, h]
theorem toSubmodule_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = U.toSubmodule ↔ S = U :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a non-unital subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.copy s hs with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : a ∈ s) => by
show r • a ∈ s
rw [hs] at ha ⊢
exact S.smul_mem' r ha }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
| rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 164 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Path
/-!
# Product of homotopies
In this file, we introduce definitions for the product of
homotopies. We show that the products of relative homotopies
are still relative homotopies. Finally, we specialize to the case
of path homotopies, and provide the definition for the product of path classes.
We show various lemmas associated with these products, such as the fact that
path products commute with path composition, and that projection is the inverse
of products.
## Definitions
### General homotopies
- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.pi homotopies`: Let f and g be a family of functions
indexed on I, such that for each i ∈ I, fᵢ and gᵢ are maps from A to Xᵢ.
Let `homotopies` be a family of homotopies from fᵢ to gᵢ for each i.
Then `Homotopy.pi homotopies` is the canonical homotopy
from ∏ f to ∏ g, where ∏ f is the product map from A to Πi, Xᵢ,
and similarly for ∏ g.
- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.pi homotopies`: Same as `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.pi`, but
all homotopies are done relative to some set S ⊆ A.
- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.prod F G` is the product of homotopies F and G,
where F is a homotopy between f₀ and f₁, G is a homotopy between g₀ and g₁.
The result F × G is a homotopy between (f₀ × g₀) and (f₁ × g₁).
Again, all homotopies are done relative to S.
- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.prod F G`: Same as `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.prod`, but
all homotopies are done relative to some set S ⊆ A.
### Path products
- `Path.Homotopic.pi` The product of a family of path classes, where a path class is an equivalence
class of paths up to path homotopy.
- `Path.Homotopic.prod` The product of two path classes.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContinuousMap
open ContinuousMap
section Pi
variable {I A : Type*} {X : I → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [TopologicalSpace A]
{f g : ∀ i, C(A, X i)} {S : Set A}
/-- The relative product homotopy of `homotopies` between functions `f` and `g` -/
@[simps!]
def HomotopyRel.pi (homotopies : ∀ i : I, HomotopyRel (f i) (g i) S) :
HomotopyRel (pi f) (pi g) S :=
{ Homotopy.pi fun i => (homotopies i).toHomotopy with
prop' := by
intro t x hx
dsimp only [coe_mk, pi_eval, toFun_eq_coe, HomotopyWith.coe_toContinuousMap]
simp only [funext_iff, ← forall_and]
intro i
exact (homotopies i).prop' t x hx }
end Pi
section Prod
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {A : Type*} [TopologicalSpace A]
{f₀ f₁ : C(A, α)} {g₀ g₁ : C(A, β)} {S : Set A}
/-- The product of homotopies `F` and `G`,
where `F` takes `f₀` to `f₁` and `G` takes `g₀` to `g₁` -/
@[simps]
def Homotopy.prod (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (G : Homotopy g₀ g₁) :
Homotopy (ContinuousMap.prodMk f₀ g₀) (ContinuousMap.prodMk f₁ g₁) where
toFun t := (F t, G t)
map_zero_left x := by simp only [prod_eval, Homotopy.apply_zero]
map_one_left x := by simp only [prod_eval, Homotopy.apply_one]
/-- The relative product of homotopies `F` and `G`,
where `F` takes `f₀` to `f₁` and `G` takes `g₀` to `g₁` -/
@[simps!]
def HomotopyRel.prod (F : HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S) (G : HomotopyRel g₀ g₁ S) :
HomotopyRel (prodMk f₀ g₀) (prodMk f₁ g₁) S where
toHomotopy := Homotopy.prod F.toHomotopy G.toHomotopy
prop' t x hx := Prod.ext (F.prop' t x hx) (G.prop' t x hx)
end Prod
end ContinuousMap
namespace Path.Homotopic
attribute [local instance] Path.Homotopic.setoid
local infixl:70 " ⬝ " => Quotient.comp
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] {as bs cs : ∀ i, X i}
/-- The product of a family of path homotopies. This is just a specialization of `HomotopyRel`. -/
def piHomotopy (γ₀ γ₁ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) (H : ∀ i, Path.Homotopy (γ₀ i) (γ₁ i)) :
Path.Homotopy (Path.pi γ₀) (Path.pi γ₁) :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.pi H
/-- The product of a family of path homotopy classes. -/
def pi (γ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i)) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs :=
(Quotient.map Path.pi fun x y hxy =>
Nonempty.map (piHomotopy x y) (Classical.nonempty_pi.mpr hxy)) (Quotient.choice γ)
theorem pi_lift (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) :
(Path.Homotopic.pi fun i => ⟦γ i⟧) = ⟦Path.pi γ⟧ := by unfold pi; simp
/-- Composition and products commute.
This is `Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans` descended to path homotopy classes. -/
theorem comp_pi_eq_pi_comp (γ₀ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i))
(γ₁ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (bs i) (cs i)) : pi γ₀ ⬝ pi γ₁ = pi fun i ↦ γ₀ i ⬝ γ₁ i := by
induction γ₁ using Quotient.induction_on_pi with | _ a =>
induction γ₀ using Quotient.induction_on_pi
simp only [pi_lift]
rw [← Path.Homotopic.comp_lift, Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans, ← pi_lift]
rfl
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the ith coordinate. -/
abbrev proj (i : ι) (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i) :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_apply i⟩
/-- Lemmas showing projection is the inverse of pi. -/
@[simp]
theorem proj_pi (i : ι) (paths : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i)) :
proj i (pi paths) = paths i := by
induction paths using Quotient.induction_on_pi
rw [proj, pi_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem pi_proj (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs) : (pi fun i => proj i p) = p := by
induction p using Quotient.inductionOn
simp_rw [proj, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
erw [pi_lift]
congr
end Pi
section Prod
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {a₁ a₂ a₃ : α} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : β}
{p₁ p₁' : Path a₁ a₂} {p₂ p₂' : Path b₁ b₂} (q₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₁ a₂)
(q₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₁ b₂)
/-- The product of homotopies h₁ and h₂.
This is `HomotopyRel.prod` specialized for path homotopies. -/
def prodHomotopy (h₁ : Path.Homotopy p₁ p₁') (h₂ : Path.Homotopy p₂ p₂') :
Path.Homotopy (p₁.prod p₂) (p₁'.prod p₂') :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.prod h₁ h₂
/-- The product of path classes q₁ and q₂. This is `Path.prod` descended to the quotient. -/
def prod (q₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₁ a₂) (q₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₁ b₂) :
Path.Homotopic.Quotient (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) :=
Quotient.map₂ Path.prod (fun _ _ h₁ _ _ h₂ => Nonempty.map2 prodHomotopy h₁ h₂) q₁ q₂
variable (p₁ p₁' p₂ p₂')
theorem prod_lift : prod ⟦p₁⟧ ⟦p₂⟧ = ⟦p₁.prod p₂⟧ :=
rfl
variable (r₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₂ a₃) (r₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₂ b₃)
/-- Products commute with path composition.
This is `trans_prod_eq_prod_trans` descended to the quotient. -/
theorem comp_prod_eq_prod_comp : prod q₁ q₂ ⬝ prod r₁ r₂ = prod (q₁ ⬝ r₁) (q₂ ⬝ r₂) := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
induction r₁, r₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
simp only [prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.comp_lift, Path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans]
variable {c₁ c₂ : α × β}
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the left coordinate of a path class. -/
abbrev projLeft (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁ c₂) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁.1 c₂.1 :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_fst⟩
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the right coordinate of a path class. -/
abbrev projRight (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁ c₂) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁.2 c₂.2 :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_snd⟩
/-- Lemmas showing projection is the inverse of product. -/
@[simp]
theorem projLeft_prod : projLeft (prod q₁ q₂) = q₁ := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
rw [projLeft, prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem projRight_prod : projRight (prod q₁ q₂) = q₂ := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
rw [projRight, prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem prod_projLeft_projRight (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)) :
prod (projLeft p) (projRight p) = p := by
induction p using Quotient.inductionOn
simp only [projLeft, projRight, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift, prod_lift]
congr
end Prod
end Path.Homotopic
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Product.lean | 247 | 253 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
/-!
# Down-compressions
This file defines down-compression.
Down-compressing `𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)` along `a : α` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜`,
when the resulting set is not already in `𝒜`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.nonMemberSubfamily`: `𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a` is the subfamily of sets not containing
`a`.
* `Finset.memberSubfamily`: `𝒜.memberSubfamily a` is the image of the subfamily of sets containing
`a` under removing `a`.
* `Down.compression`: Down-compression.
## Notation
`𝓓 a 𝒜` is notation for `Down.compress a 𝒜` in locale `SetFamily`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, down-compression
-/
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α} {a : α}
namespace Finset
/-- Elements of `𝒜` that do not contain `a`. -/
def nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) := {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s}
/-- Image of the elements of `𝒜` which contain `a` under removing `a`. Finsets that do not contain
`a` such that `insert a s ∈ 𝒜`. -/
def memberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s}.image fun s => erase s a
@[simp]
theorem mem_nonMemberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ↔ s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp [nonMemberSubfamily]
@[simp]
theorem mem_memberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ↔ insert a s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨insert a s, ⟨h.1, by simp⟩, erase_insert h.2⟩⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs1, hs2⟩, rfl⟩
rw [insert_erase hs2]
exact ⟨hs1, not_mem_erase _ _⟩
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_inter_distrib _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
unfold memberSubfamily
rw [filter_inter_distrib, image_inter_of_injOn _ _ ((erase_injOn' _).mono _)]
simp
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_union _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, filter_union, image_union]
theorem card_memberSubfamily_add_card_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
#(𝒜.memberSubfamily a) + #(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a) = #𝒜 := by
rw [memberSubfamily, nonMemberSubfamily, card_image_of_injOn]
· conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun s => (a ∈ s))]
· apply (erase_injOn' _).mono
simp
theorem memberSubfamily_union_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.image fun s => s.erase a := by
ext s
simp only [mem_union, mem_memberSubfamily, mem_nonMemberSubfamily, mem_image, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_insert h.2⟩
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_eq_of_not_mem h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inl ⟨by rwa [insert_erase ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [erase_eq_of_not_mem ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_memberSubfamily : (𝒜.memberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily : (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_memberSubfamily :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily :
(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
lemma memberSubfamily_image_insert (h𝒜 : ∀ s ∈ 𝒜, a ∉ s) :
(𝒜.image <| insert a).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜 := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ ⟨⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h𝒜 _ hs⟩⟩
rintro ⟨⟨t, ht, hts⟩, hs⟩
rwa [← insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn (h𝒜 _ ht) hs hts]
@[simp] lemma nonMemberSubfamily_image_insert : (𝒜.image <| insert a).nonMemberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] lemma memberSubfamily_image_erase : (𝒜.image (erase · a)).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' (mem_insert_self _ _) (not_mem_erase _ _)).symm]
lemma image_insert_memberSubfamily (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (a : α) :
| (𝒜.memberSubfamily a).image (insert a) = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s} := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨hs, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨erase s a, ⟨?_, not_mem_erase _ _⟩, insert_erase ha⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨hs, mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· rwa [insert_erase ha]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/Down.lean | 139 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.HasOuterApproxClosed
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
/-!
# Finite measures
This file defines the type of finite measures on a given measurable space. When the underlying
space has a topology and the measurable space structure (sigma algebra) is finer than the Borel
sigma algebra, then the type of finite measures is equipped with the topology of weak convergence
of measures. The topology of weak convergence is the coarsest topology w.r.t. which
for every bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued function `f`, the integration of `f` against the
measure is continuous.
## Main definitions
The main definitions are
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`: The type of finite measures on `Ω` with the topology of weak
convergence of measures.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → (WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`:
Interpret a finite measure as a continuous linear functional on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω`. This is used for the definition of the
topology of weak convergence.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.map`: The push-forward `f* μ` of a finite measure `μ` on `Ω`
along a measurable function `f : Ω → Ω'`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mapCLM`: The push-forward along a given continuous `f : Ω → Ω'`
as a continuous linear map `f* : FiniteMeasure Ω →L[ℝ≥0] FiniteMeasure Ω'`.
## Main results
* Finite measures `μ` on `Ω` give rise to continuous linear functionals on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω` via integration:
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → (WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto`: Convergence of finite
measures is characterized by the convergence of integrals of all bounded continuous functions.
This shows that the chosen definition of topology coincides with the common textbook definition
of weak convergence of measures. A similar characterization by the convergence of integrals (in
the `MeasureTheory.lintegral` sense) of all bounded continuous nonnegative functions is
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.continuous_map`: For a continuous function `f : Ω → Ω'`, the
push-forward of finite measures `f* : FiniteMeasure Ω → FiniteMeasure Ω'` is continuous.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.t2Space`: The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures
is Hausdorff on spaces where indicators of closed sets have continuous decreasing approximating
sequences (in particular on any pseudo-metrizable spaces).
## Implementation notes
The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures is defined using a mapping from
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` to `WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)`, inheriting the topology from the
latter.
The implementation of `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` and is directly as a subtype of
`MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`, and the coercion to a function is the composition `ENNReal.toNNReal`
and the coercion to function of `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. Another alternative would have been to
use a bijection with `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure Ω ℝ≥0` as an intermediate step. Some
considerations:
* Potential advantages of using the `NNReal`-valued vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would avoid need to compose with `ENNReal.toNNReal`, the
`NNReal`-valued API could be more directly available.
* Potential drawbacks of the vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would lose monotonicity, as non-measurable sets would be defined to
have measure 0.
* No integration theory directly. E.g., the topology definition requires
`MeasureTheory.lintegral` w.r.t. a coercion to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω` in any case.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, finite measure
-/
noncomputable section
open BoundedContinuousFunction Filter MeasureTheory Set Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace FiniteMeasure
section FiniteMeasure
/-! ### Finite measures
In this section we define the `Type` of `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`, when `Ω` is a measurable
space. Finite measures on `Ω` are a module over `ℝ≥0`.
If `Ω` is moreover a topological space and the sigma algebra on `Ω` is finer than the Borel sigma
algebra (i.e. `[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]`), then `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` is equipped with
the topology of weak convergence of measures. This is implemented by defining a pairing of finite
measures `μ` on `Ω` with continuous bounded nonnegative functions `f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0` via integration,
and using the associated weak topology (essentially the weak-star topology on the dual of
`Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0`).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- Finite measures are defined as the subtype of measures that have the property of being finite
measures (i.e., their total mass is finite). -/
def _root_.MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsFiniteMeasure μ }
/-- Coercion from `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. -/
@[coe]
def toMeasure : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
/-- A finite measure can be interpreted as a measure. -/
instance instCoe : Coe (FiniteMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) := { coe := toMeasure }
instance isFiniteMeasure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) := μ.prop
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) := rfl
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (FiniteMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective <| Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_lt_top (↑ν) s).ne
@[simp]
theorem null_iff_toMeasure_null (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
ν s = 0 ↔ (ν : Measure Ω) s = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure, h, ENNReal.coe_zero],
fun h ↦ congrArg ENNReal.toNNReal h⟩
theorem apply_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : Set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ :=
ENNReal.toNNReal_mono (measure_ne_top _ s₂) ((μ : Measure Ω).mono h)
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
protected lemma tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {f : ι → Set Ω} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
simpa [← ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure]
using tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate (μ := μ.toMeasure) (ι := ι)
/-- The (total) mass of a finite measure `μ` is `μ univ`, i.e., the cast to `NNReal` of
`(μ : measure Ω) univ`. -/
def mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ℝ≥0 := μ univ
@[simp] theorem apply_le_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) : μ s ≤ μ.mass := by
simpa using apply_mono μ (subset_univ s)
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_mass {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} : (μ.mass : ℝ≥0∞) = (μ : Measure Ω) univ :=
ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure μ Set.univ
instance instZero : Zero (FiniteMeasure Ω) where zero := ⟨0, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : FiniteMeasure Ω) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_mass : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).mass = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mass_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun μ_mass => ?_, fun hμ => by simp only [hμ, zero_mass]⟩
apply toMeasure_injective
apply Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.mp
rwa [← ennreal_mass, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
theorem mass_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff μ
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → (μ : Measure Ω) s = (ν : Measure Ω) s) : μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
ext1 s s_mble
exact h s s_mble
theorem eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
ext1 s s_mble
simpa [ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble)
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (FiniteMeasure Ω) := ⟨0⟩
instance instAdd : Add (FiniteMeasure Ω) where add μ ν := ⟨μ + ν, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd⟩
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul : SMul R (FiniteMeasure Ω) where
smul (c : R) μ := ⟨c • (μ : Measure Ω), MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_zero : ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) 0 = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(μ + ν) = (↑μ + ↑ν : Measure Ω) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_smul (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(c • μ) = c • (μ : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : (⇑(μ + ν) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (⇑μ + ⇑ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_inj, ne_eq, ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
ENNReal.coe_add]
norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(⇑(c • μ) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = c • (⇑μ : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext; simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ENNReal.coe_smul]
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
toMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid _ toMeasure_zero toMeasure_add fun _ _ ↦ toMeasure_smul _ _
/-- Coercion is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def toMeasureAddMonoidHom : FiniteMeasure Ω →+ Measure Ω where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := toMeasure_zero
map_add' := toMeasure_add
instance {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Module ℝ≥0 (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
Function.Injective.module _ toMeasureAddMonoidHom toMeasure_injective toMeasure_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s := by
rw [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
/-- Restrict a finite measure μ to a set A. -/
def restrict (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω where
val := (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A
property := MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure Ω) A
theorem restrict_measure_eq (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) = (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A := rfl
theorem restrict_apply_measure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω}
(s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) s = (μ : Measure Ω) (s ∩ A) :=
Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
theorem restrict_apply (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω} (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict A) s = μ (s ∩ A) := by
apply congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal
exact Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
theorem restrict_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : (μ.restrict A).mass = μ A := by
simp only [mass, restrict_apply μ A MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
theorem restrict_eq_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A = 0 ↔ μ A = 0 := by
rw [← mass_zero_iff, restrict_mass]
theorem restrict_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A ≠ 0 ↔ μ A ≠ 0 := by
rw [← mass_nonzero_iff, restrict_mass]
/-- The type of finite measures is a measurable space when equipped with the Giry monad. -/
instance : MeasurableSpace (FiniteMeasure Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace
/-- The set of all finite measures is a measurable set in the Giry monad. -/
lemma measurableSet_isFiniteMeasure : MeasurableSet { μ : Measure Ω | IsFiniteMeasure μ } := by
suffices { μ : Measure Ω | IsFiniteMeasure μ } = (fun μ => μ univ) ⁻¹' (Set.Ico 0 ∞) by
rw [this]
exact Measure.measurable_coe MeasurableSet.univ measurableSet_Ico
ext μ
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_iUnion, mem_preimage, mem_Ico, zero_le, true_and, exists_const]
exact isFiniteMeasure_iff μ
/-- The monoidal product is a measurabule function from the product of finite measures over
`α` and `β` into the type of finite measures over `α × β`. -/
theorem measurable_prod {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
Measurable (fun (μ : FiniteMeasure α × FiniteMeasure β)
↦ μ.1.toMeasure.prod μ.2.toMeasure) := by
have Heval {u v} (Hu : MeasurableSet u) (Hv : MeasurableSet v):
Measurable fun a : (FiniteMeasure α × FiniteMeasure β) ↦
a.1.toMeasure u * a.2.toMeasure v :=
Measurable.mul
((Measure.measurable_coe Hu).comp (measurable_subtype_coe.comp measurable_fst))
((Measure.measurable_coe Hv).comp (measurable_subtype_coe.comp measurable_snd))
apply Measurable.measure_of_isPiSystem generateFrom_prod.symm isPiSystem_prod _
· simp_rw [← Set.univ_prod_univ, Measure.prod_prod, Heval MeasurableSet.univ MeasurableSet.univ]
simp only [mem_image2, mem_setOf_eq, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intros _ _ Hu _ Hv Heq
simp_rw [← Heq, Measure.prod_prod, Heval Hu Hv]
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω]
/-- Two finite Borel measures are equal if the integrals of all non-negative bounded continuous
functions with respect to both agree. -/
theorem ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
{μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : ∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ν) :
μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
change (μ : Measure Ω) = (ν : Measure Ω)
exact ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq_of_IsFiniteMeasure h
/-- Two finite Borel measures are equal if the integrals of all bounded continuous functions with
respect to both agree. -/
theorem ext_of_forall_integral_eq [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
{μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : ∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ), ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂ν) :
μ = ν := by
apply ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq
intro f
apply (ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal_iff' (lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal μ f).ne
(lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal ν f).ne).mp
rw [toReal_lintegral_coe_eq_integral f μ, toReal_lintegral_coe_eq_integral f ν]
exact h ⟨⟨fun x => (f x).toReal, Continuous.comp' NNReal.continuous_coe f.continuous⟩,
f.map_bounded'⟩
/-- The pairing of a finite (Borel) measure `μ` with a nonnegative bounded continuous
function is obtained by (Lebesgue) integrating the (test) function against the measure.
This is `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`. -/
def testAgainstNN (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0 :=
(∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω)).toNNReal
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_coe_eq {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} :
(μ.testAgainstNN f : ℝ≥0∞) = ∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω) :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _).ne
theorem testAgainstNN_const (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (c : ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (BoundedContinuousFunction.const Ω c) = c * μ.mass := by
simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj]
theorem testAgainstNN_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} (f_le_g : (f : Ω → ℝ≥0) ≤ g) :
μ.testAgainstNN f ≤ μ.testAgainstNN g := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
gcongr
apply f_le_g
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_zero (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using μ.testAgainstNN_const 0
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_one (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 1 = μ.mass := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, coe_one, Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.coe_one, lintegral_one]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_testAgainstNN_apply (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN f = 0 := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_zero, lintegral_zero_measure, ENNReal.toNNReal_zero]
theorem zero_testAgainstNN : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN = 0 := by
funext
simp only [zero_testAgainstNN_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem smul_testAgainstNN_apply (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
(c • μ).testAgainstNN f = c • μ.testAgainstNN f := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.smul_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def,
lintegral_smul_measure]
section weak_convergence
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem testAgainstNN_add (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f₁ f₂ : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (f₁ + f₂) = μ.testAgainstNN f₁ + μ.testAgainstNN f₂ := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
exact lintegral_add_left (BoundedContinuousFunction.measurable_coe_ennreal_comp _) _
theorem testAgainstNN_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] [PseudoMetricSpace R] [Zero R]
[IsBoundedSMul R ℝ≥0] (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (c : R) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (c • f) = c • μ.testAgainstNN f := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_smul, testAgainstNN_coe_eq,
ENNReal.coe_smul]
simp_rw [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞ c (f _ : ℝ≥0∞), ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞ c (lintegral _ _ : ℝ≥0∞),
smul_eq_mul]
exact lintegral_const_mul (c • (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) f.measurable_coe_ennreal_comp
theorem testAgainstNN_lipschitz_estimate (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN f ≤ μ.testAgainstNN g + nndist f g * μ.mass := by
simp only [← μ.testAgainstNN_const (nndist f g), ← testAgainstNN_add, ← ENNReal.coe_le_coe,
BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_add, const_apply, ENNReal.coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist, testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
apply lintegral_mono
have le_dist : ∀ ω, dist (f ω) (g ω) ≤ nndist f g := BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_coe_le_dist
intro ω
have le' : f ω ≤ g ω + nndist f g := by
calc f ω
_ ≤ g ω + nndist (f ω) (g ω) := NNReal.le_add_nndist (f ω) (g ω)
_ ≤ g ω + nndist f g := (add_le_add_iff_left (g ω)).mpr (le_dist ω)
have le : (f ω : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (g ω : ℝ≥0∞) + nndist f g := by
simpa only [← ENNReal.coe_add] using (by exact_mod_cast le')
rwa [coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist] at le
theorem testAgainstNN_lipschitz (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
LipschitzWith μ.mass fun f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0 ↦ μ.testAgainstNN f := by
rw [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul]
intro f₁ f₂
suffices abs (μ.testAgainstNN f₁ - μ.testAgainstNN f₂ : ℝ) ≤ μ.mass * dist f₁ f₂ by
rwa [NNReal.dist_eq]
apply abs_le.mpr
constructor
· have key := μ.testAgainstNN_lipschitz_estimate f₂ f₁
rw [mul_comm] at key
suffices ↑(μ.testAgainstNN f₂) ≤ ↑(μ.testAgainstNN f₁) + ↑μ.mass * dist f₁ f₂ by linarith
simpa [nndist_comm] using NNReal.coe_mono key
· have key := μ.testAgainstNN_lipschitz_estimate f₁ f₂
rw [mul_comm] at key
suffices ↑(μ.testAgainstNN f₁) ≤ ↑(μ.testAgainstNN f₂) + ↑μ.mass * dist f₁ f₂ by linarith
simpa using NNReal.coe_mono key
/-- Finite measures yield elements of the `WeakDual` of bounded continuous nonnegative
functions via `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`, i.e., integration. -/
def toWeakDualBCNN (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) where
toFun f := μ.testAgainstNN f
map_add' := testAgainstNN_add μ
map_smul' := testAgainstNN_smul μ
cont := μ.testAgainstNN_lipschitz.continuous
@[simp]
theorem coe_toWeakDualBCNN (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ⇑μ.toWeakDualBCNN = μ.testAgainstNN :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWeakDualBCNN_apply (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.toWeakDualBCNN f = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ : Measure Ω)).toNNReal := rfl
/-- The topology of weak convergence on `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` is inherited (induced)
from the weak-* topology on `WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)` via the function
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN`. -/
instance instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced toWeakDualBCNN inferInstance
theorem toWeakDualBCNN_continuous : Continuous (@toWeakDualBCNN Ω _ _ _) :=
continuous_induced_dom
/-- Integration of (nonnegative bounded continuous) test functions against finite Borel measures
depends continuously on the measure. -/
theorem continuous_testAgainstNN_eval (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
Continuous fun μ : FiniteMeasure Ω ↦ μ.testAgainstNN f := by
show Continuous ((fun φ : WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) ↦ φ f) ∘ toWeakDualBCNN)
refine Continuous.comp ?_ (toWeakDualBCNN_continuous (Ω := Ω))
exact WeakBilin.eval_continuous _ _
/-- The total mass of a finite measure depends continuously on the measure. -/
theorem continuous_mass : Continuous fun μ : FiniteMeasure Ω ↦ μ.mass := by
simp_rw [← testAgainstNN_one]; exact continuous_testAgainstNN_eval 1
/-- Convergence of finite measures implies the convergence of their total masses. -/
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.mass {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ)) : Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).mass) F (𝓝 μ.mass) :=
(continuous_mass.tendsto μ).comp h
theorem tendsto_iff_weakDual_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔ Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).toWeakDualBCNN) F (𝓝 μ.toWeakDualBCNN) :=
IsInducing.tendsto_nhds_iff ⟨rfl⟩
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_toWeakDualBCNN_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ}
{μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω} {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0, Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).toWeakDualBCNN f) F (𝓝 (μ.toWeakDualBCNN f)) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_weakDual_tendsto, tendsto_iff_forall_eval_tendsto_topDualPairing]; rfl
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_testAgainstNN_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ}
{μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω} {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0, Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).testAgainstNN f) F (𝓝 (μ.testAgainstNN f)) := by
rw [FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_toWeakDualBCNN_tendsto]; rfl
/-- If the total masses of finite measures tend to zero, then the measures tend to
zero. This formulation concerns the associated functionals on bounded continuous
nonnegative test functions. See `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_zero_of_tendsto_zero_mass` for
a formulation stating the weak convergence of measures. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_testAgainstNN_of_tendsto_zero_mass {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ}
{μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω} (mass_lim : Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).mass) F (𝓝 0)) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).testAgainstNN f) F (𝓝 0) := by
apply tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.mpr
have obs := fun i ↦ (μs i).testAgainstNN_lipschitz_estimate f 0
simp_rw [testAgainstNN_zero, zero_add] at obs
simp_rw [show ∀ i, dist ((μs i).testAgainstNN f) 0 = (μs i).testAgainstNN f by
simp only [dist_nndist, NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val', eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]]
apply squeeze_zero (fun i ↦ NNReal.coe_nonneg _) obs
have lim_pair : Tendsto (fun i ↦ (⟨nndist f 0, (μs i).mass⟩ : ℝ × ℝ)) F (𝓝 ⟨nndist f 0, 0⟩) :=
(Prod.tendsto_iff _ _).mpr ⟨tendsto_const_nhds, (NNReal.continuous_coe.tendsto 0).comp mass_lim⟩
simpa using tendsto_mul.comp lim_pair
/-- If the total masses of finite measures tend to zero, then the measures tend to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_tendsto_zero_mass {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω}
(mass_lim : Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i).mass) F (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto μs F (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_forall_testAgainstNN_tendsto]
intro f
convert tendsto_zero_testAgainstNN_of_tendsto_zero_mass mass_lim f
rw [zero_testAgainstNN_apply]
/-- A characterization of weak convergence in terms of integrals of bounded continuous
nonnegative functions. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0,
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) F (𝓝 (∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ : Measure Ω))) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_forall_toWeakDualBCNN_tendsto]
simp_rw [toWeakDualBCNN_apply _ _, ← testAgainstNN_coe_eq, ENNReal.tendsto_coe,
ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
end weak_convergence -- section
section Hausdorff
variable [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
open Function
/-- The mapping `toWeakDualBCNN` from finite Borel measures to the weak dual of `Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0` is
injective, if in the underlying space `Ω`, indicator functions of closed sets have decreasing
approximations by sequences of continuous functions (in particular if `Ω` is pseudometrizable). -/
lemma injective_toWeakDualBCNN :
Injective (toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)) := by
intro μ ν hμν
apply ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq
intro f
have key := congr_fun (congrArg DFunLike.coe hμν) f
apply (ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff' ?_ ?_).mp key
· exact (lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal μ f).ne
· exact (lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal ν f).ne
variable (Ω)
lemma isEmbedding_toWeakDualBCNN :
IsEmbedding (toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)) where
eq_induced := rfl
injective := injective_toWeakDualBCNN
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_toWeakDualBCNN := isEmbedding_toWeakDualBCNN
/-- On topological spaces where indicators of closed sets have decreasing approximating sequences of
continuous functions (`HasOuterApproxClosed`), the topology of weak convergence of finite Borel
measures is Hausdorff (`T2Space`). -/
instance t2Space : T2Space (FiniteMeasure Ω) := (isEmbedding_toWeakDualBCNN Ω).t2Space
end Hausdorff -- section
end FiniteMeasure
-- section
section FiniteMeasureBoundedConvergence
/-! ### Bounded convergence results for finite measures
This section is about bounded convergence theorems for finite measures.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If a sequence of bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant
and tend pointwise to a limit, then their integrals (`MeasureTheory.lintegral`) against the finite
measure tend to the integral of the limit.
A related result with more general assumptions is
`MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const`.
-/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_nn_of_le_const (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {fs : ℕ → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ n ω, fs n ω ≤ c) {f : Ω → ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ ω, Tendsto (fun n ↦ fs n ω) atTop (𝓝 (f ω))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ ω, fs n ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω)) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω))) :=
tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const μ
(.of_forall fun n ↦ .of_forall (fs_le_const n))
(.of_forall fs_lim)
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and tend to a
limit, then their integrals against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere;
* integration is the pairing against non-negative continuous test functions
(`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`).
A related result using `MeasureTheory.lintegral` for integration is
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const`.
-/
theorem tendsto_testAgainstNN_filter_of_le_const {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[L.IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {fs : ι → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω), fs i ω ≤ c) {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω), Tendsto (fun i ↦ fs i ω) L (𝓝 (f ω))) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ.testAgainstNN (fs i)) L (𝓝 (μ.testAgainstNN f)) := by
apply (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal (μ : Measure Ω)).ne).comp
exact tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const (Ω := Ω) μ fs_le_const fs_lim
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If a sequence of bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and
tend pointwise to a limit, then their integrals (`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`)
against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
Related results:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_testAgainstNN_filter_of_le_const`:
more general assumptions
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_lintegral_nn_of_le_const`:
using `MeasureTheory.lintegral` for integration.
-/
theorem tendsto_testAgainstNN_of_le_const {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {fs : ℕ → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ n ω, fs n ω ≤ c) {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ ω, Tendsto (fun n ↦ fs n ω) atTop (𝓝 (f ω))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ μ.testAgainstNN (fs n)) atTop (𝓝 (μ.testAgainstNN f)) :=
tendsto_testAgainstNN_filter_of_le_const
(.of_forall fun n ↦ .of_forall (fs_le_const n))
(.of_forall fs_lim)
end FiniteMeasureBoundedConvergence
-- section
section FiniteMeasureConvergenceByBoundedContinuousFunctions
/-! ### Weak convergence of finite measures with bounded continuous real-valued functions
In this section we characterize the weak convergence of finite measures by the usual (defining)
condition that the integrals of all bounded continuous real-valued functions converge.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem tendsto_of_forall_integral_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μ : FiniteMeasure Ω}
(h : ∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ,
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, f x ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) F (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂(μ : Measure Ω)))) :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) := by
apply tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mpr
intro f
apply (ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff (fi := F)
(fun i ↦ (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal (μs i)).ne) (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal μ).ne).mp
have lip : LipschitzWith 1 ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) := isometry_subtype_coe.lipschitz
set f₀ := BoundedContinuousFunction.comp _ lip f with _def_f₀
have f₀_eq : ⇑f₀ = ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ ⇑f := rfl
have f₀_nn : 0 ≤ ⇑f₀ := fun _ ↦ by
simp only [f₀_eq, Pi.zero_apply, Function.comp_apply, NNReal.zero_le_coe]
have f₀_ae_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[(μ : Measure Ω)] ⇑f₀ := .of_forall f₀_nn
have f₀_ae_nns : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[(μs i : Measure Ω)] ⇑f₀ := fun i ↦ .of_forall f₀_nn
have aux :=
integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae f₀_ae_nn f₀.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable
have auxs := fun i ↦
integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (f₀_ae_nns i) f₀.continuous.measurable.aestronglyMeasurable
simp_rw [f₀_eq, Function.comp_apply, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] at aux auxs
simpa only [← aux, ← auxs] using h f₀
/-- A characterization of weak convergence in terms of integrals of bounded continuous
real-valued functions. -/
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto {γ : Type*} {F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ,
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, f x ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) F (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂(μ : Measure Ω))) := by
refine ⟨?_, tendsto_of_forall_integral_tendsto⟩
rw [tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto]
intro h f
simp_rw [BoundedContinuousFunction.integral_eq_integral_nnrealPart_sub]
set f_pos := f.nnrealPart with _def_f_pos
set f_neg := (-f).nnrealPart with _def_f_neg
have tends_pos := (ENNReal.tendsto_toReal (f_pos.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal μ).ne).comp (h f_pos)
have tends_neg := (ENNReal.tendsto_toReal (f_neg.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal μ).ne).comp (h f_neg)
have aux :
∀ g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0,
(ENNReal.toReal ∘ fun i : γ ↦ ∫⁻ x : Ω, ↑(g x) ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) =
fun i : γ ↦ (∫⁻ x : Ω, ↑(g x) ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)).toReal :=
fun _ ↦ rfl
simp_rw [aux, BoundedContinuousFunction.toReal_lintegral_coe_eq_integral] at tends_pos tends_neg
exact Tendsto.sub tends_pos tends_neg
theorem tendsto_iff_forall_integral_rclike_tendsto {γ : Type*} (𝕜 : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜]
{F : Filter γ} {μs : γ → FiniteMeasure Ω} {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} :
Tendsto μs F (𝓝 μ) ↔
∀ f : Ω →ᵇ 𝕜,
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ ω, f ω ∂(μs i : Measure Ω)) F (𝓝 (∫ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω))) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto]
refine ⟨fun h f ↦ ?_, fun h f ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← integral_re_add_im (integrable μ f)]
simp_rw [← integral_re_add_im (integrable (μs _) f)]
refine Tendsto.add ?_ ?_
· exact (RCLike.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp (h (f.comp RCLike.re RCLike.lipschitzWith_re))
· exact (Tendsto.comp (RCLike.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _)
(h (f.comp RCLike.im RCLike.lipschitzWith_im))).mul_const _
· specialize h ((RCLike.ofRealAm (K := 𝕜)).compLeftContinuousBounded ℝ
RCLike.lipschitzWith_ofReal f)
simp only [AlgHom.compLeftContinuousBounded_apply_apply, RCLike.ofRealAm_coe,
Complex.coe_algebraMap, integral_ofReal] at h
exact tendsto_ofReal_iff'.mp h
lemma continuous_integral_boundedContinuousFunction
{α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] (f : α →ᵇ ℝ) :
Continuous fun μ : FiniteMeasure α ↦ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro μ
exact continuousAt_of_tendsto_nhds
(FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto.mp tendsto_id f)
end FiniteMeasureConvergenceByBoundedContinuousFunctions -- section
section map
variable {Ω Ω' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω']
/-- The push-forward of a finite measure by a function between measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def map (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω → Ω') : FiniteMeasure Ω' :=
⟨(ν : Measure Ω).map f, by
constructor
by_cases f_aemble : AEMeasurable f ν
· rw [Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable f_aemble MeasurableSet.univ]
exact measure_lt_top (↑ν) (f ⁻¹' univ)
· simp [Measure.map, f_aemble]⟩
@[simp] lemma toMeasure_map (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω → Ω') :
(ν.map f).toMeasure = ν.toMeasure.map f := rfl
/-- Note that this is an equality of elements of `ℝ≥0∞`. See also
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.map_apply` for the corresponding equality as elements of `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma map_apply' (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f : Ω → Ω'} (f_aemble : AEMeasurable f ν)
{A : Set Ω'} (A_mble : MeasurableSet A) :
(ν.map f : Measure Ω') A = (ν : Measure Ω) (f ⁻¹' A) :=
Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable f_aemble A_mble
lemma map_apply_of_aemeasurable (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f : Ω → Ω'} (f_aemble : AEMeasurable f ν)
{A : Set Ω'} (A_mble : MeasurableSet A) :
ν.map f A = ν (f ⁻¹' A) := by
have key := ν.map_apply' f_aemble A_mble
exact (ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff' (measure_ne_top _ _) (measure_ne_top _ _)).mpr key
lemma map_apply (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f : Ω → Ω'} (f_mble : Measurable f)
{A : Set Ω'} (A_mble : MeasurableSet A) :
ν.map f A = ν (f ⁻¹' A) :=
map_apply_of_aemeasurable ν f_mble.aemeasurable A_mble
@[simp] lemma map_add {f : Ω → Ω'} (f_mble : Measurable f) (ν₁ ν₂ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(ν₁ + ν₂).map f = ν₁.map f + ν₂.map f := by
ext s s_mble
simp only [map_apply' _ f_mble.aemeasurable s_mble, toMeasure_add, Measure.add_apply]
@[simp] lemma map_smul {f : Ω → Ω'} (c : ℝ≥0) (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(c • ν).map f = c • (ν.map f) := by
ext s _
simp [toMeasure_smul]
/-- The push-forward of a finite measure by a function between measurable spaces as a linear map. -/
noncomputable def mapHom {f : Ω → Ω'} (f_mble : Measurable f) :
FiniteMeasure Ω →ₗ[ℝ≥0] FiniteMeasure Ω' where
| toFun := fun ν ↦ ν.map f
map_add' := map_add f_mble
map_smul' := map_smul
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/FiniteMeasure.lean | 769 | 772 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Basic
/-!
# Index of a Subgroup
In this file we define the index of a subgroup, and prove several divisibility properties.
Several theorems proved in this file are known as Lagrange's theorem.
## Main definitions
- `H.index` : the index of `H : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite.
- `H.relindex K` : the relative index of `H : Subgroup G` in `K : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite.
# Main results
- `card_mul_index` : `Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G`
- `index_mul_card` : `H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G`
- `index_dvd_card` : `H.index ∣ Fintype.card G`
- `relindex_mul_index` : If `H ≤ K`, then `H.relindex K * K.index = H.index`
- `index_dvd_of_le` : If `H ≤ K`, then `K.index ∣ H.index`
- `relindex_mul_relindex` : `relindex` is multiplicative in towers
- `MulAction.index_stabilizer`: the index of the stabilizer is the cardinality of the orbit
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
open Cardinal Function
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] (H K L : Subgroup G)
/-- The index of a subgroup as a natural number. Returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The index of an additive subgroup as a natural number.
Returns 0 if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def index : ℕ :=
Nat.card (G ⧸ H)
/-- If `H` and `K` are subgroups of a group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ` is the index
of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "If `H` and `K` are subgroups of an additive group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ`
is the index of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def relindex : ℕ :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap_of_surjective {f : G' →* G} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.comap f).index = H.index := by
have key : ∀ x y : G',
QuotientGroup.leftRel (H.comap f) x y ↔ QuotientGroup.leftRel H (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
exact fun x y => iff_of_eq (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]))
refine Cardinal.toNat_congr (Equiv.ofBijective (Quotient.map' f fun x y => (key x y).mp) ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [← Quotient.eq''] at key
refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
refine Quotient.ind' fun y => ?_
exact (key x y).mpr
· refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, (Quotient.map'_mk'' f _ y).trans (congr_arg Quotient.mk'' hy)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap (f : G' →* G) :
(H.comap f).index = H.relindex f.range :=
Eq.trans (congr_arg index (by rfl))
((H.subgroupOf f.range).index_comap_of_surjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_comap (f : G' →* G) (K : Subgroup G') :
relindex (comap f H) K = relindex H (map f K) := by
rw [relindex, subgroupOf, comap_comap, index_comap, ← f.map_range, K.range_subtype]
variable {H K L}
@[to_additive relindex_mul_index]
theorem relindex_mul_index (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K * K.index = H.index :=
((mul_comm _ _).trans (Cardinal.toNat_mul _ _).symm).trans
(congr_arg Cardinal.toNat (Equiv.cardinal_eq (quotientEquivProdOfLE h))).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem index_dvd_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : K.index ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_left_eq (H.relindex K) (relindex_mul_index h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_right_eq K.index (relindex_mul_index h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_subgroupOf (hKL : K ≤ L) :
(H.subgroupOf L).relindex (K.subgroupOf L) = H.relindex K :=
((index_comap (H.subgroupOf L) (inclusion hKL)).trans (congr_arg _ (inclusion_range hKL))).symm
variable (H K L)
@[to_additive relindex_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_mul_relindex (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) :
H.relindex K * K.relindex L = H.relindex L := by
rw [← relindex_subgroupOf hKL]
exact relindex_mul_index fun x hx => hHK hx
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_right : (H ⊓ K).relindex K = H.relindex K := by
rw [relindex, relindex, inf_subgroupOf_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_left : (H ⊓ K).relindex H = K.relindex H := by
rw [inf_comm, inf_relindex_right]
@[to_additive relindex_inf_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_inf_mul_relindex : H.relindex (K ⊓ L) * K.relindex L = (H ⊓ K).relindex L := by
rw [← inf_relindex_right H (K ⊓ L), ← inf_relindex_right K L, ← inf_relindex_right (H ⊓ K) L,
inf_assoc, relindex_mul_relindex (H ⊓ (K ⊓ L)) (K ⊓ L) L inf_le_right inf_le_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_right [K.Normal] : K.relindex (H ⊔ K) = K.relindex H :=
Nat.card_congr (QuotientGroup.quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient H K).toEquiv.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_left [K.Normal] : K.relindex (K ⊔ H) = K.relindex H := by
rw [sup_comm, relindex_sup_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_normal [H.Normal] : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
relindex_sup_right K H ▸ relindex_dvd_index_of_le le_sup_right
variable {H K}
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) : K.relindex L ∣ H.relindex L :=
inf_of_le_left hHK ▸ dvd_of_mul_left_eq _ (relindex_inf_mul_relindex _ _ _)
/-- A subgroup has index two if and only if there exists `a` such that for all `b`, exactly one
of `b * a` and `b` belong to `H`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup has index two if and only if there exists `a` such that
for all `b`, exactly one of `b + a` and `b` belong to `H`."]
theorem index_eq_two_iff : H.index = 2 ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b, Xor' (b * a ∈ H) (b ∈ H) := by
simp only [index, Nat.card_eq_two_iff' ((1 : G) : G ⧸ H), ExistsUnique, inv_mem_iff,
QuotientGroup.exists_mk, QuotientGroup.forall_mk, Ne, QuotientGroup.eq, mul_one,
xor_iff_iff_not]
refine exists_congr fun a =>
⟨fun ha b => ⟨fun hba hb => ?_, fun hb => ?_⟩, fun ha => ⟨?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩⟩
· exact ha.1 ((mul_mem_cancel_left hb).1 hba)
· exact inv_inv b ▸ ha.2 _ (mt (inv_mem_iff (x := b)).1 hb)
· rw [← inv_mem_iff (x := a), ← ha, inv_mul_cancel]
exact one_mem _
· rwa [ha, inv_mem_iff (x := b)]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_iff_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ (a ∈ H ↔ b ∈ H) := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ H; · simp only [ha, true_iff, mul_mem_cancel_left ha]
by_cases hb : b ∈ H; · simp only [hb, iff_true, mul_mem_cancel_right hb]
simp only [ha, hb, iff_true]
rcases index_eq_two_iff.1 h with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine (hc _).or.resolve_left ?_
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_mem_cancel_right ((hc _).or.resolve_right hb)]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_self_mem_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) (a : G) : a * a ∈ H := by
rw [mul_mem_iff_of_index_two h]
@[to_additive two_smul_mem_of_index_two]
theorem sq_mem_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) (a : G) : a ^ 2 ∈ H :=
(pow_two a).symm ▸ mul_self_mem_of_index_two h a
variable (H K) {f : G →* G'}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem index_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).index = 1 :=
Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique.mpr ⟨QuotientGroup.subsingleton_quotient_top, ⟨1⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem index_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).index = Nat.card G :=
Cardinal.toNat_congr QuotientGroup.quotientBot.toEquiv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_top_left : (⊤ : Subgroup G).relindex H = 1 :=
index_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_top_right : H.relindex ⊤ = H.index := by
rw [← relindex_mul_index (show H ≤ ⊤ from le_top), index_top, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_bot_left : (⊥ : Subgroup G).relindex H = Nat.card H := by
rw [relindex, bot_subgroupOf, index_bot]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_bot_right : H.relindex ⊥ = 1 := by rw [relindex, subgroupOf_bot_eq_top, index_top]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_self : H.relindex H = 1 := by rw [relindex, subgroupOf_self, index_top]
@[to_additive]
theorem index_ker (f : G →* G') : f.ker.index = Nat.card f.range := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comap_bot, index_comap, relindex_bot_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_ker (f : G →* G') : f.ker.relindex K = Nat.card (K.map f) := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comap_bot, relindex_comap, relindex_bot_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_mul_index]
theorem card_mul_index : Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G := by
rw [← relindex_bot_left, ← index_bot]
exact relindex_mul_index bot_le
@[to_additive]
theorem card_dvd_of_surjective (f : G →* G') (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Nat.card G' ∣ Nat.card G := by
rw [← Nat.card_congr (QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective f hf).toEquiv]
exact Dvd.intro_left (Nat.card f.ker) f.ker.card_mul_index
@[to_additive]
theorem card_range_dvd (f : G →* G') : Nat.card f.range ∣ Nat.card G :=
card_dvd_of_surjective f.rangeRestrict f.rangeRestrict_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem card_map_dvd (f : G →* G') : Nat.card (H.map f) ∣ Nat.card H :=
card_dvd_of_surjective (f.subgroupMap H) (f.subgroupMap_surjective H)
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map (f : G →* G') :
(H.map f).index = (H ⊔ f.ker).index * f.range.index := by
rw [← comap_map_eq, index_comap, relindex_mul_index (H.map_le_range f)]
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map_dvd {f : G →* G'} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).index ∣ H.index := by
rw [index_map, f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, index_top, mul_one]
exact index_dvd_of_le le_sup_left
@[to_additive]
theorem dvd_index_map {f : G →* G'} (hf : f.ker ≤ H) :
H.index ∣ (H.map f).index := by
rw [index_map, sup_of_le_left hf]
apply dvd_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map_eq (hf1 : Surjective f) (hf2 : f.ker ≤ H) : (H.map f).index = H.index :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (H.index_map_dvd hf1) (H.dvd_index_map hf2)
@[to_additive]
lemma index_map_of_bijective (hf : Bijective f) (H : Subgroup G) : (H.map f).index = H.index :=
index_map_eq _ hf.2 (by rw [f.ker_eq_bot_iff.2 hf.1]; exact bot_le)
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map_of_injective {f : G →* G'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(H.map f).index = H.index * f.range.index := by
rw [H.index_map, f.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr hf, sup_bot_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem index_map_subtype {H : Subgroup G} (K : Subgroup H) :
(K.map H.subtype).index = K.index * H.index := by
rw [K.index_map_of_injective H.subtype_injective, H.range_subtype]
@[to_additive]
theorem index_eq_card : H.index = Nat.card (G ⧸ H) :=
rfl
@[to_additive index_mul_card]
theorem index_mul_card : H.index * Nat.card H = Nat.card G := by
rw [mul_comm, card_mul_index]
@[to_additive]
theorem index_dvd_card : H.index ∣ Nat.card G :=
⟨Nat.card H, H.index_mul_card.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_card : H.relindex K ∣ Nat.card K :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index_dvd_card
variable {H K L}
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K.relindex L = 0) : H.relindex L = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (hKL ▸ relindex_dvd_of_le_left L hHK)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right (hKL : K ≤ L) (hHK : H.relindex K = 0) : H.relindex L = 0 :=
Finite.card_eq_zero_of_embedding (quotientSubgroupOfEmbeddingOfLE H hKL) hHK
@[to_additive]
theorem index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero (h : H.relindex K = 0) : H.index = 0 :=
H.relindex_top_right.symm.trans (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right le_top h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_le_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) (hHL : H.relindex L ≠ 0) :
K.relindex L ≤ H.relindex L :=
Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hHL) (relindex_dvd_of_le_left L hHK)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_le_of_le_right (hKL : K ≤ L) (hHL : H.relindex L ≠ 0) :
H.relindex K ≤ H.relindex L :=
Finite.card_le_of_embedding' (quotientSubgroupOfEmbeddingOfLE H hKL) fun h => (hHL h).elim
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_ne_zero_trans (hHK : H.relindex K ≠ 0) (hKL : K.relindex L ≠ 0) :
H.relindex L ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mul_ne_zero (mt (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right (show K ⊓ L ≤ K from inf_le_left)) hHK) hKL
((relindex_inf_mul_relindex H K L).trans (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left inf_le_left h))
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_inf_ne_zero (hH : H.relindex L ≠ 0) (hK : K.relindex L ≠ 0) :
(H ⊓ K).relindex L ≠ 0 := by
replace hH : H.relindex (K ⊓ L) ≠ 0 := mt (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_right inf_le_right) hH
rw [← inf_relindex_right] at hH hK ⊢
rw [inf_assoc]
exact relindex_ne_zero_trans hH hK
@[to_additive]
theorem index_inf_ne_zero (hH : H.index ≠ 0) (hK : K.index ≠ 0) : (H ⊓ K).index ≠ 0 := by
rw [← relindex_top_right] at hH hK ⊢
exact relindex_inf_ne_zero hH hK
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_inf_le : (H ⊓ K).relindex L ≤ H.relindex L * K.relindex L := by
by_cases h : H.relindex L = 0
· exact (le_of_eq (relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left inf_le_left h)).trans (zero_le _)
rw [← inf_relindex_right, inf_assoc, ← relindex_mul_relindex _ _ L inf_le_right inf_le_right,
inf_relindex_right, inf_relindex_right]
exact mul_le_mul_right' (relindex_le_of_le_right inf_le_right h) (K.relindex L)
@[to_additive]
theorem index_inf_le : (H ⊓ K).index ≤ H.index * K.index := by
simp_rw [← relindex_top_right, relindex_inf_le]
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_iInf_ne_zero {ι : Type*} [_hι : Finite ι] {f : ι → Subgroup G}
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).relindex L ≠ 0) : (⨅ i, f i).relindex L ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite ι
(Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr fun i _hi => hf i) ∘
Nat.card_pi.symm.trans ∘
Finite.card_eq_zero_of_embedding (quotientiInfSubgroupOfEmbedding f L)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_iInf_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → Subgroup G) :
(⨅ i, f i).relindex L ≤ ∏ i, (f i).relindex L :=
le_of_le_of_eq
(Finite.card_le_of_embedding' (quotientiInfSubgroupOfEmbedding f L) fun h =>
let ⟨i, _hi, h⟩ := Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff.mp (Nat.card_pi.symm.trans h)
relindex_eq_zero_of_le_left (iInf_le f i) h)
Nat.card_pi
@[to_additive]
theorem index_iInf_ne_zero {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : ι → Subgroup G}
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).index ≠ 0) : (⨅ i, f i).index ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [← relindex_top_right] at hf ⊢
exact relindex_iInf_ne_zero hf
@[to_additive]
theorem index_iInf_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → Subgroup G) :
(⨅ i, f i).index ≤ ∏ i, (f i).index := by simp_rw [← relindex_top_right, relindex_iInf_le]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) index_eq_one]
theorem index_eq_one : H.index = 1 ↔ H = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h =>
QuotientGroup.subgroup_eq_top_of_subsingleton H (Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique.mp h).1,
fun h => (congr_arg index h).trans index_top⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp) relindex_eq_one]
theorem relindex_eq_one : H.relindex K = 1 ↔ K ≤ H :=
index_eq_one.trans subgroupOf_eq_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_eq_one]
theorem card_eq_one : Nat.card H = 1 ↔ H = ⊥ :=
H.relindex_bot_left ▸ relindex_eq_one.trans le_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma inf_eq_bot_of_coprime (h : Nat.Coprime (Nat.card H) (Nat.card K)) : H ⊓ K = ⊥ :=
card_eq_one.1 <| Nat.eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes h
(card_dvd_of_le inf_le_left) (card_dvd_of_le inf_le_right)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-18")]
alias _root_.add_inf_eq_bot_of_coprime := AddSubgroup.inf_eq_bot_of_coprime
@[to_additive]
theorem index_ne_zero_of_finite [hH : Finite (G ⧸ H)] : H.index ≠ 0 := by
cases nonempty_fintype (G ⧸ H)
rw [index_eq_card]
exact Nat.card_pos.ne'
/-- Finite index implies finite quotient. -/
@[to_additive "Finite index implies finite quotient."]
noncomputable def fintypeOfIndexNeZero (hH : H.index ≠ 0) : Fintype (G ⧸ H) :=
@Fintype.ofFinite _ (Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero hH)
@[to_additive]
lemma index_eq_zero_iff_infinite : H.index = 0 ↔ Infinite (G ⧸ H) := by
simp [index_eq_card, Nat.card_eq_zero]
@[to_additive one_lt_index_of_ne_top]
theorem one_lt_index_of_ne_top [Finite (G ⧸ H)] (hH : H ≠ ⊤) : 1 < H.index :=
Nat.one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨index_ne_zero_of_finite, mt index_eq_one.mp hH⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma finite_quotient_of_finite_quotient_of_index_ne_zero {X : Type*} [MulAction G X]
[Finite <| MulAction.orbitRel.Quotient G X] (hi : H.index ≠ 0) :
Finite <| MulAction.orbitRel.Quotient H X := by
have := fintypeOfIndexNeZero hi
exact MulAction.finite_quotient_of_finite_quotient_of_finite_quotient
@[to_additive]
lemma finite_quotient_of_pretransitive_of_index_ne_zero {X : Type*} [MulAction G X]
[MulAction.IsPretransitive G X] (hi : H.index ≠ 0) :
Finite <| MulAction.orbitRel.Quotient H X := by
have := (MulAction.pretransitive_iff_subsingleton_quotient G X).1 inferInstance
exact finite_quotient_of_finite_quotient_of_index_ne_zero hi
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_pow_mem_of_index_ne_zero (h : H.index ≠ 0) (a : G) :
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ n ≤ H.index ∧ a ^ n ∈ H := by
suffices ∃ n₁ n₂, n₁ < n₂ ∧ n₂ ≤ H.index ∧ ((a ^ n₂ : G) : G ⧸ H) = ((a ^ n₁ : G) : G ⧸ H) by
rcases this with ⟨n₁, n₂, hlt, hle, he⟩
refine ⟨n₂ - n₁, by omega, by omega, ?_⟩
rw [eq_comm, QuotientGroup.eq, ← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_neg, ← zpow_add,
add_comm] at he
rw [← zpow_natCast]
convert he
omega
suffices ∃ n₁ n₂, n₁ ≠ n₂ ∧ n₁ ≤ H.index ∧ n₂ ≤ H.index ∧
((a ^ n₂ : G) : G ⧸ H) = ((a ^ n₁ : G) : G ⧸ H) by
rcases this with ⟨n₁, n₂, hne, hle₁, hle₂, he⟩
rcases hne.lt_or_lt with hlt | hlt
· exact ⟨n₁, n₂, hlt, hle₂, he⟩
· exact ⟨n₂, n₁, hlt, hle₁, he.symm⟩
by_contra hc
simp_rw [not_exists] at hc
let f : (Set.Icc 0 H.index) → G ⧸ H := fun n ↦ (a ^ (n : ℕ) : G)
have hf : Function.Injective f := by
rintro ⟨n₁, h₁, hle₁⟩ ⟨n₂, h₂, hle₂⟩ he
have hc' := hc n₁ n₂
dsimp only [f] at he
simpa [hle₁, hle₂, he] using hc'
have := (fintypeOfIndexNeZero h).finite
have hcard := Finite.card_le_of_injective f hf
simp [← index_eq_card] at hcard
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_pow_mem_of_relindex_ne_zero (h : H.relindex K ≠ 0) {a : G} (ha : a ∈ K) :
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ n ≤ H.relindex K ∧ a ^ n ∈ H ⊓ K := by
rcases exists_pow_mem_of_index_ne_zero h ⟨a, ha⟩ with ⟨n, hlt, hle, he⟩
refine ⟨n, hlt, hle, ?_⟩
simpa [pow_mem ha, mem_subgroupOf] using he
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_mem_of_index_ne_zero_of_dvd (h : H.index ≠ 0) (a : G) {n : ℕ}
(hn : ∀ m, 0 < m → m ≤ H.index → m ∣ n) : a ^ n ∈ H := by
rcases exists_pow_mem_of_index_ne_zero h a with ⟨m, hlt, hle, he⟩
rcases hn m hlt hle with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [pow_mul]
exact pow_mem he _
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_mem_of_relindex_ne_zero_of_dvd (h : H.relindex K ≠ 0) {a : G} (ha : a ∈ K) {n : ℕ}
(hn : ∀ m, 0 < m → m ≤ H.relindex K → m ∣ n) : a ^ n ∈ H ⊓ K := by
convert pow_mem_of_index_ne_zero_of_dvd h ⟨a, ha⟩ hn
simp [pow_mem ha, mem_subgroupOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) index_prod]
lemma index_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup G') : (H.prod K).index = H.index * K.index := by
simp_rw [index, ← Nat.card_prod]
refine Nat.card_congr
((Quotient.congrRight (fun x y ↦ ?_)).trans (Setoid.prodQuotientEquiv _ _).symm)
rw [QuotientGroup.leftRel_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.index_sum := AddSubgroup.index_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma index_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (H : ι → Subgroup G) :
(Subgroup.pi Set.univ H).index = ∏ i, (H i).index := by
simp_rw [index, ← Nat.card_pi]
refine Nat.card_congr
((Quotient.congrRight (fun x y ↦ ?_)).trans (Setoid.piQuotientEquiv _).symm)
rw [QuotientGroup.leftRel_pi]
@[simp]
lemma index_toAddSubgroup : (Subgroup.toAddSubgroup H).index = H.index :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.AddSubgroup.index_toSubgroup {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (H : AddSubgroup G) :
(AddSubgroup.toSubgroup H).index = H.index :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma relindex_toAddSubgroup :
(Subgroup.toAddSubgroup H).relindex (Subgroup.toAddSubgroup K) = H.relindex K :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.AddSubgroup.relindex_toSubgroup {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (H K : AddSubgroup G) :
(AddSubgroup.toSubgroup H).relindex (AddSubgroup.toSubgroup K) = H.relindex K :=
rfl
section FiniteIndex
/-- Typeclass for finite index subgroups. -/
class _root_.AddSubgroup.FiniteIndex {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (H : AddSubgroup G) : Prop where
/-- The additive subgroup has finite index;
recall that `AddSubgroup.index` returns 0 when the index is infinite. -/
index_ne_zero : H.index ≠ 0
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-13")]
alias _root_AddSubgroup.FiniteIndex.finiteIndex := AddSubgroup.FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero
variable (H) in
/-- Typeclass for finite index subgroups. -/
@[to_additive] class FiniteIndex : Prop where
/-- The subgroup has finite index;
recall that `Subgroup.index` returns 0 when the index is infinite. -/
index_ne_zero : H.index ≠ 0
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-13")] alias FiniteIndex.finiteIndex := FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero
/-- Typeclass for a subgroup `H` to have finite index in a subgroup `K`. -/
class _root_.AddSubgroup.IsFiniteRelIndex {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (H K : AddSubgroup G) :
Prop where
protected relindex_ne_zero : H.relindex K ≠ 0
variable (H K) in
/-- Typeclass for a subgroup `H` to have finite index in a subgroup `K`. -/
@[to_additive] class IsFiniteRelIndex : Prop where
protected relindex_ne_zero : H.relindex K ≠ 0
@[to_additive] lemma relindex_ne_zero [H.IsFiniteRelIndex K] : H.relindex K ≠ 0 :=
IsFiniteRelIndex.relindex_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
instance IsFiniteRelIndex.to_finiteIndex_subgroupOf [H.IsFiniteRelIndex K] :
(H.subgroupOf K).FiniteIndex where
index_ne_zero := relindex_ne_zero
/-- A finite index subgroup has finite quotient. -/
@[to_additive "A finite index subgroup has finite quotient"]
noncomputable def fintypeQuotientOfFiniteIndex [FiniteIndex H] : Fintype (G ⧸ H) :=
fintypeOfIndexNeZero FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
instance finite_quotient_of_finiteIndex [FiniteIndex H] : Finite (G ⧸ H) :=
fintypeQuotientOfFiniteIndex.finite
@[to_additive]
theorem finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient [Finite (G ⧸ H)] : FiniteIndex H :=
⟨index_ne_zero_of_finite⟩
-- Porting note: had to manually provide finite instance for quotient when it should be automatic
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) finiteIndex_of_finite [Finite G] : FiniteIndex H :=
@finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient _ _ H (Quotient.finite _)
@[to_additive]
instance : FiniteIndex (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
⟨ne_of_eq_of_ne index_top one_ne_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [FiniteIndex H] [FiniteIndex K] : FiniteIndex (H ⊓ K) :=
⟨index_inf_ne_zero FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finiteIndex_iInf {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : ι → Subgroup G}
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).FiniteIndex) : (⨅ i, f i).FiniteIndex :=
⟨index_iInf_ne_zero fun i => (hf i).index_ne_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finiteIndex_iInf' {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι}
(f : ι → Subgroup G) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).FiniteIndex) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, f i).FiniteIndex := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact finiteIndex_iInf fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => hs i hi
@[to_additive]
instance instFiniteIndex_subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) [H.FiniteIndex] :
(H.subgroupOf K).FiniteIndex :=
⟨fun h => H.index_ne_zero_of_finite <| H.index_eq_zero_of_relindex_eq_zero h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finiteIndex_of_le [FiniteIndex H] (h : H ≤ K) : FiniteIndex K :=
⟨ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero (index_dvd_of_le h)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
lemma index_antitone (h : H ≤ K) [H.FiniteIndex] : K.index ≤ H.index :=
Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero FiniteIndex.index_ne_zero) (index_dvd_of_le h)
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
lemma index_strictAnti (h : H < K) [H.FiniteIndex] : K.index < H.index := by
have h0 : K.index ≠ 0 := (finiteIndex_of_le h.le).index_ne_zero
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (index_antitone h.le)
rw [← relindex_mul_index h.le, Ne, eq_comm, mul_eq_right₀ h0, relindex_eq_one]
exact h.not_le
variable (H K)
@[to_additive]
instance finiteIndex_ker {G' : Type*} [Group G'] (f : G →* G') [Finite f.range] :
f.ker.FiniteIndex :=
@finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient G _ f.ker
(Finite.of_equiv f.range (QuotientGroup.quotientKerEquivRange f).symm)
instance finiteIndex_normalCore [H.FiniteIndex] : H.normalCore.FiniteIndex := by
rw [normalCore_eq_ker]
infer_instance
end FiniteIndex
end Subgroup
namespace MulAction
variable (G : Type*) {X : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G X] (x : X)
|
@[to_additive] theorem index_stabilizer :
(stabilizer G x).index = (orbit G x).ncard :=
(Nat.card_congr (MulAction.orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer G x)).symm.trans
(Set.Nat.card_coe_set_eq (orbit G x))
@[to_additive] theorem index_stabilizer_of_transitive [IsPretransitive G X] :
(stabilizer G x).index = Nat.card X := by
rw [index_stabilizer, orbit_eq_univ, Set.ncard_univ]
end MulAction
namespace MonoidHom
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Index.lean | 626 | 638 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GlueData
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Opens
import Mathlib.Tactic.Generalize
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
/-!
# Gluing Topological spaces
Given a family of gluing data (see `Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GlueData.lean`), we can then glue them
together.
The construction should be "sealed" and considered as a black box, while only using the API
provided.
## Main definitions
* `TopCat.GlueData`: A structure containing the family of gluing data.
* `CategoryTheory.GlueData.glued`: The glued topological space.
This is defined as the multicoequalizer of `∐ V i j ⇉ ∐ U i`, so that the general colimit API
can be used.
* `CategoryTheory.GlueData.ι`: The immersion `ι i : U i ⟶ glued` for each `i : ι`.
* `TopCat.GlueData.Rel`: A relation on `Σ i, D.U i` defined by `⟨i, x⟩ ~ ⟨j, y⟩` iff
`⟨i, x⟩ = ⟨j, y⟩` or `t i j x = y`. See `TopCat.GlueData.ι_eq_iff_rel`.
* `TopCat.GlueData.mk`: A constructor of `GlueData` whose conditions are stated in terms of
elements rather than subobjects and pullbacks.
* `TopCat.GlueData.ofOpenSubsets`: Given a family of open sets, we may glue them into a new
topological space. This new space embeds into the original space, and is homeomorphic to it if
the given family is an open cover (`TopCat.GlueData.openCoverGlueHomeo`).
## Main results
* `TopCat.GlueData.isOpen_iff`: A set in `glued` is open iff its preimage along each `ι i` is
open.
* `TopCat.GlueData.ι_jointly_surjective`: The `ι i`s are jointly surjective.
* `TopCat.GlueData.rel_equiv`: `Rel` is an equivalence relation.
* `TopCat.GlueData.ι_eq_iff_rel`: `ι i x = ι j y ↔ ⟨i, x⟩ ~ ⟨j, y⟩`.
* `TopCat.GlueData.image_inter`: The intersection of the images of `U i` and `U j` in `glued` is
`V i j`.
* `TopCat.GlueData.preimage_range`: The preimage of the image of `U i` in `U j` is `V i j`.
* `TopCat.GlueData.preimage_image_eq_image`: The preimage of the image of some `U ⊆ U i` is
given by XXX.
* `TopCat.GlueData.ι_isOpenEmbedding`: Each of the `ι i`s are open embeddings.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Topology
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace TopCat
/-- A family of gluing data consists of
1. An index type `J`
2. An object `U i` for each `i : J`.
3. An object `V i j` for each `i j : J`.
(Note that this is `J × J → TopCat` rather than `J → J → TopCat` to connect to the
limits library easier.)
4. An open embedding `f i j : V i j ⟶ U i` for each `i j : ι`.
5. A transition map `t i j : V i j ⟶ V j i` for each `i j : ι`.
such that
6. `f i i` is an isomorphism.
7. `t i i` is the identity.
8. `V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V i j ⟶ V j i` factors through `V j k ×[U j] V j i ⟶ V j i` via some
`t' : V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V j k ×[U j] V j i`.
(This merely means that `V i j ∩ V i k ⊆ t i j ⁻¹' (V j i ∩ V j k)`.)
9. `t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _`.
We can then glue the topological spaces `U i` together by identifying `V i j` with `V j i`, such
that the `U i`'s are open subspaces of the glued space.
Most of the times it would be easier to use the constructor `TopCat.GlueData.mk'` where the
conditions are stated in a less categorical way.
-/
structure GlueData extends CategoryTheory.GlueData TopCat where
f_open : ∀ i j, IsOpenEmbedding (f i j)
f_mono i j := (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mpr (f_open i j).isEmbedding.injective
namespace GlueData
variable (D : GlueData.{u})
local notation "𝖣" => D.toGlueData
theorem π_surjective : Function.Surjective 𝖣.π :=
(TopCat.epi_iff_surjective 𝖣.π).mp inferInstance
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set 𝖣.glued) : IsOpen U ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (𝖣.ι i ⁻¹' U) := by
delta CategoryTheory.GlueData.ι
simp_rw [← Multicoequalizer.ι_sigmaπ 𝖣.diagram]
rw [← (homeoOfIso (Multicoequalizer.isoCoequalizer 𝖣.diagram).symm).isOpen_preimage]
rw [coequalizer_isOpen_iff, colimit_isOpen_iff.{u}]
tauto
theorem ι_jointly_surjective (x : 𝖣.glued) : ∃ (i : _) (y : D.U i), 𝖣.ι i y = x :=
𝖣.ι_jointly_surjective (forget TopCat) x
/-- An equivalence relation on `Σ i, D.U i` that holds iff `𝖣.ι i x = 𝖣.ι j y`.
See `TopCat.GlueData.ι_eq_iff_rel`.
-/
def Rel (a b : Σ i, ((D.U i : TopCat) : Type _)) : Prop :=
∃ x : D.V (a.1, b.1), D.f _ _ x = a.2 ∧ D.f _ _ (D.t _ _ x) = b.2
theorem rel_equiv : Equivalence D.Rel :=
⟨fun x => ⟨inv (D.f _ _) x.2, IsIso.inv_hom_id_apply (D.f x.fst x.fst) _,
-- Use `elementwise_of%` elaborator instead of `IsIso.inv_hom_id_apply` to work around
-- `ConcreteCategory`/`HasForget` mismatch:
by simp [elementwise_of% IsIso.inv_hom_id (D.f x.fst x.fst)]⟩, by
rintro a b ⟨x, e₁, e₂⟩
exact ⟨D.t _ _ x, e₂, by rw [← e₁, D.t_inv_apply]⟩, by
rintro ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨j, b⟩ ⟨k, c⟩ ⟨x, e₁, e₂⟩
rintro ⟨y, e₃, e₄⟩
let z := (pullbackIsoProdSubtype (D.f j i) (D.f j k)).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, e₂.trans e₃.symm⟩
have eq₁ : (D.t j i) ((pullback.fst _ _ : _ /-(D.f j k)-/ ⟶ D.V (j, i)) z) = x := by
dsimp only [coe_of, z]
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply, D.t_inv_apply]
have eq₂ : (pullback.snd _ _ : _ ⟶ D.V _) z = y := pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply _ _ _
clear_value z
use (pullback.fst _ _ : _ ⟶ D.V (i, k)) (D.t' _ _ _ z)
dsimp only at *
substs eq₁ eq₂ e₁ e₃ e₄
have h₁ : D.t' j i k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ D.f i k = pullback.fst _ _ ≫ D.t j i ≫ D.f i j := by
| rw [← 𝖣.t_fac_assoc]; congr 1; exact pullback.condition
have h₂ : D.t' j i k ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ D.t i k ≫ D.f k i =
pullback.snd _ _ ≫ D.t j k ≫ D.f k j := by
rw [← 𝖣.t_fac_assoc]
apply @Epi.left_cancellation _ _ _ _ (D.t' k j i)
rw [𝖣.cocycle_assoc, 𝖣.t_fac_assoc, 𝖣.t_inv_assoc]
exact pullback.condition.symm
exact ⟨CategoryTheory.congr_fun h₁ z, CategoryTheory.congr_fun h₂ z⟩⟩
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
theorem eqvGen_of_π_eq
-- Porting note: was `{x y : ∐ D.U}`
{x y : sigmaObj (β := D.toGlueData.J) (C := TopCat) D.toGlueData.U}
(h : 𝖣.π x = 𝖣.π y) :
Relation.EqvGen
(Function.Coequalizer.Rel 𝖣.diagram.fstSigmaMap 𝖣.diagram.sndSigmaMap) x y := by
delta GlueData.π Multicoequalizer.sigmaπ at h
replace h : coequalizer.π D.diagram.fstSigmaMap D.diagram.sndSigmaMap x =
coequalizer.π D.diagram.fstSigmaMap D.diagram.sndSigmaMap y :=
(TopCat.mono_iff_injective (Multicoequalizer.isoCoequalizer 𝖣.diagram).inv).mp
inferInstance h
let diagram := parallelPair 𝖣.diagram.fstSigmaMap 𝖣.diagram.sndSigmaMap ⋙ forget _
have : colimit.ι diagram one x = colimit.ι diagram one y := by
dsimp only [coequalizer.π] at h
rw [← ι_preservesColimitIso_hom, ConcreteCategory.forget_map_eq_coe, types_comp_apply]
erw [h]
| Mathlib/Topology/Gluing.lean | 133 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Aurélien Saue, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# `ring` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions (`a * b`)
- scalar multiplication of expressions (`n • a`; the multiplier must have type `ℕ`)
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The extension to exponents means that something like `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)` can be proved,
even though it is not strictly speaking an equation in the language of commutative rings.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ExSum` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The outline of the file:
- Define a mutual inductive family of types `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The mutual induction ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ExSum` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ExSum` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `Ex*` types)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
## Caveats and future work
The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ringNFCore`.
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
/-- A shortcut instance for `CommSemiring ℕ` used by ring. -/
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
/--
A typed expression of type `CommSemiring ℕ` used when we are working on
ring subexpressions of type `ℕ`.
-/
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
mutual
/-- The base `e` of a normalized exponent expression. -/
inductive ExBase : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/--
An atomic expression `e` with id `id`.
Atomic expressions are those which `ring` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring1` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms, but `ring_nf` does.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions, modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom for a given expression.
-/
| atom {sα} {e} (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
/-- A sum of monomials. -/
| sum {sα} {e} (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
/--
A monomial, which is a product of powers of `ExBase` expressions,
terminated by a (nonzero) constant coefficient.
-/
inductive ExProd : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- A coefficient `value`, which must not be `0`. `e` is a raw rat cast.
If `value` is not an integer, then `hyp` should be a proof of `(value.den : α) ≠ 0`. -/
| const {sα} {e} (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
/-- A product `x ^ e * b` is a monomial if `b` is a monomial. Here `x` is an `ExBase`
and `e` is an `ExProd` representing a monomial expression in `ℕ` (it is a monomial instead of
a polynomial because we eagerly normalize `x ^ (a + b) = x ^ a * x ^ b`.) -/
| mul {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
/-- A polynomial expression, which is a sum of monomials. -/
inductive ExSum : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- Zero is a polynomial. `e` is the expression `0`. -/
| zero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
/-- A sum `a + b` is a polynomial if `a` is a monomial and `b` is another polynomial. -/
| add {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/-- Equality test for expressions. This is not a `BEq` instance because it is heterogeneous. -/
partial def ExBase.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/--
A total order on normalized expressions.
This is not an `Ord` instance because it is heterogeneous.
-/
partial def ExBase.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
variable {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)}
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
/-- Converts `ExBase sα` to `ExBase sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExBase.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
/-- Converts `ExProd sα` to `ExProd sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExProd.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
/-- Converts `ExSum sα` to `ExSum sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExSum.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
variable {u : Lean.Level}
/--
The result of evaluating an (unnormalized) expression `e` into the type family `E`
(one of `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`) is a (normalized) element `e'`
and a representation `E e'` for it, and a proof of `e = e'`.
-/
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The normalized result. -/
expr : Q($α)
/-- The data associated to the normalization. -/
val : E expr
/-- A proof that the original expression is equal to the normalized result. -/
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance {α : Q(Type u)} {E : Q($α) → Type} {e : Q($α)} [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] :
Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const n`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const (-n)`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const q h` for `q = n / d`
and `h` a proof that `(d : α) ≠ 0`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
/-- Embed an exponent (an `ExBase, ExProd` pair) as an `ExProd` by multiplying by 1. -/
def ExBase.toProd {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)}
(va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
/-- Embed `ExProd` in `ExSum` by adding 0. -/
def ExProd.toSum {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) :=
.add v .zero
/-- Get the leading coefficient of an `ExProd`. -/
def ExProd.coeff {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
/--
Two monomials are said to "overlap" if they differ by a constant factor, in which case the
constants just add. When this happens, the constant may be either zero (if the monomials cancel)
or nonzero (if they add up); the zero case is handled specially.
-/
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to `0`. -/
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to another monomial
(with nonzero leading coefficient). -/
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
variable {a a' a₁ a₂ a₃ b b' b₁ b₂ b₃ c c₁ c₂ : R}
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
-- TODO: decide if this is a good idea globally in
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60MonadLift.20Option.20.28OptionT.20m.29.60/near/469097834
private local instance {m} [Pure m] : MonadLift Option (OptionT m) where
monadLift f := .mk <| pure f
/--
Given monomials `va, vb`, attempts to add them together to get another monomial.
If the monomials are not compatible, returns `none`.
For example, `xy + 2xy = 3xy` is a `.nonzero` overlap, while `xy + xz` returns `none`
and `xy + -xy = 0` is a `.zero` overlap.
-/
def evalAddOverlap {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
/-- Adds two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 + b = b`
* `a + 0 = a`
* `a * x + a * y = a * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `evalAddOverlap`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + (a₂ + (b₁ + b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + ((a₁ + a₂) + b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalAdd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => return ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => return ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match ← (evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁).run with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) :
a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap {ea eb e : ℕ} (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
/-- Multiplies two monomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result monomial.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * (b₂ * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * y = a₁ * (a₂ * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(x ^ ea * a₂) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ (ea + eb) * (a₂ * b₂)`
(if `ea` and `eb` are identical except coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = a₁ * (a₂ * (b₁ * b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * ((a₁ * a₂) * b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalMulProd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
return ⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₃ vb
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₃
return ⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) ← (evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb).run then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add {d : R} (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
/-- Multiplies a monomial `va` to a polynomial `vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a * 0 = 0`
* `a * (b₁ + b₂) = (a * b₁) + (a * b₂)`
-/
def evalMul₁ {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(mul_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul₁ va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁.toSum vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(mul_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem zero_mul (b : R) : 0 * b = 0 := by simp
theorem add_mul {d : R} (_ : (a₁ : R) * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ * b = c₂) (_ : c₁ + c₂ = d) :
(a₁ + a₂) * b = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.add_mul]
/-- Multiplies two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 * b = 0`
* `(a₁ + a₂) * b = (a₁ * b) + (a₂ * b)`
-/
def evalMul {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_mul $b)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMul₁ sα va₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul va₂ vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(add_mul $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem natCast_nat (n) : ((Nat.rawCast n : ℕ) : R) = Nat.rawCast n := by simp
theorem natCast_mul {a₁ a₃ : ℕ} (a₂) (_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁)
(_ : ((a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₃) : ((a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ ^ a₂ * b₃ := by
subst_vars; simp
theorem natCast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 := Nat.cast_zero
theorem natCast_add {a₁ a₂ : ℕ}
(_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁) (_ : ((a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₂) : ((a₁ + a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp
mutual
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* An atom `e` causes `↑e` to be allocated as a new atom.
* A sum delegates to `ExSum.evalNatCast`.
-/
partial def ExBase.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExBase sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => do
let (i, ⟨b', _⟩) ← addAtomQ q($a)
pure ⟨b', ExBase.atom i, q(Eq.refl $b')⟩
| .sum va => do
let ⟨_, vc, p⟩ ← va.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .sum vc, p⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat monomial to produce a monomial in `α`.
* `↑c = c` if `c` is a numeric literal
* `↑(a ^ n * b) = ↑a ^ n * ↑b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .const c hc =>
have n : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
pure ⟨q(Nat.rawCast $n), .const c hc, (q(natCast_nat (R := $α) $n) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₃, pb₃⟩ ← va₃.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .mul vb₁ va₂ vb₃, q(natCast_mul $a₂ $pb₁ $pb₃)⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* `↑0 = 0`
* `↑(a + b) = ↑a + ↑b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .zero => pure ⟨_, .zero, q(natCast_zero (R := $α))⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← va₂.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, q(natCast_add $pb₁ $pb₂)⟩
end
theorem smul_nat {a b c : ℕ} (_ : (a * b : ℕ) = c) : a • b = c := by subst_vars; simp
theorem smul_eq_cast {a : ℕ} (_ : ((a : ℕ) : R) = a') (_ : a' * b = c) : a • b = c := by
subst_vars; simp
/-- Constructs the scalar multiplication `n • a`, where both `n : ℕ` and `a : α` are normalized
polynomial expressions.
* `a • b = a * b` if `α = ℕ`
* `a • b = ↑a * b` otherwise
-/
def evalNSMul {a : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a • $b)) := do
if ← isDefEq sα sℕ then
let ⟨_, va'⟩ := va.cast
have _b : Q(ℕ) := b
let ⟨(_c : Q(ℕ)), vc, (pc : Q($a * $_b = $_c))⟩ ← evalMul sα va' vb
pure ⟨_, vc, (q(smul_nat $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, va', pa'⟩ ← va.evalNatCast sα
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα va' vb
pure ⟨_, vc, (q(smul_eq_cast $pa' $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem neg_one_mul {R} [Ring R] {a b : R} (_ : (Int.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)).rawCast * a = b) :
-a = b := by subst_vars; simp [Int.negOfNat]
theorem neg_mul {R} [Ring R] (a₁ : R) (a₂) {a₃ b : R}
(_ : -a₃ = b) : -(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃) = a₁ ^ a₂ * b := by subst_vars; simp
/-- Negates a monomial `va` to get another monomial.
* `-c = (-c)` (for `c` coefficient)
* `-(a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * -a₂`
-/
def evalNegProd {a : Q($α)} (rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExProd sα a) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q(-$a) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va with
| .const za ha =>
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit 1
let ⟨m1, _⟩ := ExProd.mkNegNat sα rα 1
let rm := Result.isNegNat rα lit (q(IsInt.of_raw $α (.negOfNat $lit)) : Expr)
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha
let rb := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($m1 * $a) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) rm ra).get!
let ⟨zb, hb⟩ := rb.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨b, (pb : Q((Int.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)).rawCast * $a = $b))⟩ := rb.toRawEq
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(neg_one_mul (R := $α) $pb) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ =>
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalNegProd rα va₃
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vb, (q(neg_mul $a₁ $a₂ $pb) : Expr)⟩
theorem neg_zero {R} [Ring R] : -(0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem neg_add {R} [Ring R] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : R}
(_ : -a₁ = b₁) (_ : -a₂ = b₂) : -(a₁ + a₂) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_comm]
/-- Negates a polynomial `va` to get another polynomial.
* `-0 = 0` (for `c` coefficient)
* `-(a₁ + a₂) = -a₁ + -a₂`
-/
def evalNeg {a : Q($α)} (rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q(-$a) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, (q(neg_zero (R := $α)) : Expr)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← evalNegProd sα rα va₁
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← evalNeg rα va₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, (q(neg_add $pb₁ $pb₂) : Expr)⟩
theorem sub_pf {R} [Ring R] {a b c d : R}
(_ : -b = c) (_ : a + c = d) : a - b = d := by subst_vars; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- Subtracts two polynomials `va, vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a - b = a + -b`
-/
def evalSub {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {a b : Q($α)}
(rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a - $b) := do
let ⟨_c, vc, pc⟩ ← evalNeg sα rα vb
let ⟨d, vd, (pd : Q($a + $_c = $d))⟩ ← evalAdd sα va vc
return ⟨d, vd, (q(sub_pf $pc $pd) : Expr)⟩
theorem pow_prod_atom (a : R) (b) : a ^ b = (a + 0) ^ b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp
/--
The fallback case for exponentiating polynomials is to use `ExBase.toProd` to just build an
exponent expression. (This has a slightly different normalization than `evalPowAtom` because
the input types are different.)
* `x ^ e = (x + 0) ^ e * 1`
-/
def evalPowProdAtom {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b) :=
⟨_, (ExBase.sum va.toSum).toProd vb, q(pow_prod_atom $a $b)⟩
theorem pow_atom (a : R) (b) : a ^ b = a ^ b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
/--
The fallback case for exponentiating polynomials is to use `ExBase.toProd` to just build an
exponent expression.
* `x ^ e = x ^ e * 1 + 0`
-/
def evalPowAtom {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) :=
⟨_, (va.toProd vb).toSum, q(pow_atom $a $b)⟩
theorem const_pos (n : ℕ) (h : Nat.ble 1 n = true) : 0 < (n.rawCast : ℕ) := Nat.le_of_ble_eq_true h
theorem mul_exp_pos {a₁ a₂ : ℕ} (n) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) : 0 < a₁ ^ n * a₂ :=
Nat.mul_pos (Nat.pow_pos h₁) h₂
theorem add_pos_left {a₁ : ℕ} (a₂) (h : 0 < a₁) : 0 < a₁ + a₂ :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
theorem add_pos_right {a₂ : ℕ} (a₁) (h : 0 < a₂) : 0 < a₁ + a₂ :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
mutual
/-- Attempts to prove that a polynomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* Atoms are not (necessarily) positive
* Sums defer to `ExSum.evalPos`
-/
partial def ExBase.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => none
| .sum va => va.evalPos
/-- Attempts to prove that a monomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* `0 < c` (where `c` is a numeral) is true by the normalization invariant (`c` is not zero)
* `0 < x ^ e * b` if `0 < x` and `0 < b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .const _ _ =>
-- it must be positive because it is a nonzero nat literal
have lit : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
haveI : $a =Q Nat.rawCast $lit := ⟨⟩
haveI p : Nat.ble 1 $lit =Q true := ⟨⟩
some q(const_pos $lit $p)
| .mul (e := ea₁) vxa₁ _ va₂ => do
let pa₁ ← vxa₁.evalPos
let pa₂ ← va₂.evalPos
some q(mul_exp_pos $ea₁ $pa₁ $pa₂)
/-- Attempts to prove that a polynomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* `0 < 0` fails
* `0 < a + b` if `0 < a` or `0 < b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .zero => none
| .add (a := a₁) (b := a₂) va₁ va₂ => do
match va₁.evalPos with
| some p => some q(add_pos_left $a₂ $p)
| none => let p ← va₂.evalPos; some q(add_pos_right $a₁ $p)
end
theorem pow_one (a : R) : a ^ nat_lit 1 = a := by simp
theorem pow_bit0 {k : ℕ} (_ : (a : R) ^ k = b) (_ : b * b = c) :
a ^ (Nat.mul (nat_lit 2) k) = c := by
subst_vars; simp [Nat.succ_mul, pow_add]
theorem pow_bit1 {k : ℕ} {d : R} (_ : (a : R) ^ k = b) (_ : b * b = c) (_ : c * a = d) :
a ^ (Nat.add (Nat.mul (nat_lit 2) k) (nat_lit 1)) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [Nat.succ_mul, pow_add]
/--
The main case of exponentiation of ring expressions is when `va` is a polynomial and `n` is a
nonzero literal expression, like `(x + y)^5`. In this case we work out the polynomial completely
into a sum of monomials.
* `x ^ 1 = x`
* `x ^ (2*n) = x ^ n * x ^ n`
* `x ^ (2*n+1) = x ^ n * x ^ n * x`
-/
partial def evalPowNat {a : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (n : Q(ℕ)) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $n) := do
let nn := n.natLit!
if nn = 1 then
return ⟨_, va, (q(pow_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let nm := nn >>> 1
have m : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit nm
if nn &&& 1 = 0 then
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalPowNat va m
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα vb vb
return ⟨_, vc, (q(pow_bit0 $pb $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalPowNat va m
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα vb vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalMul sα vc va
return ⟨_, vd, (q(pow_bit1 $pb $pc $pd) : Expr)⟩
theorem one_pow (b : ℕ) : ((nat_lit 1).rawCast : R) ^ b = (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp
theorem mul_pow {ea₁ b c₁ : ℕ} {xa₁ : R}
(_ : ea₁ * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ ^ b = c₂) : (xa₁ ^ ea₁ * a₂ : R) ^ b = xa₁ ^ c₁ * c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_pow, pow_mul]
/-- There are several special cases when exponentiating monomials:
* `1 ^ n = 1`
* `x ^ y = (x ^ y)` when `x` and `y` are constants
* `(a * b) ^ e = a ^ e * b ^ e`
In all other cases we use `evalPowProdAtom`.
-/
def evalPowProd {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
let res : OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b)) := do
match va, vb with
| .const 1, _ => return ⟨_, va, (q(one_pow (R := $α) $b) : Expr)⟩
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
assert! 0 ≤ zb
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha
have lit : Q(ℕ) := b.appArg!
let rb := (q(IsNat.of_raw ℕ $lit) : Expr)
let rc ← NormNum.evalPow.core q($a ^ $b) q(HPow.hPow) q($a) q($b) lit rb
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul vxa₁ vea₁ va₂, vb =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sℕ vea₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalPowProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa₁ vc₁ vc₂, q(mul_pow $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
return (← res.run).getD (evalPowProdAtom sα va vb)
/--
The result of `extractCoeff` is a numeral and a proof that the original expression
factors by this numeral.
-/
structure ExtractCoeff (e : Q(ℕ)) where
/-- A raw natural number literal. -/
k : Q(ℕ)
/-- The result of extracting the coefficient is a monic monomial. -/
e' : Q(ℕ)
/-- `e'` is a monomial. -/
ve' : ExProd sℕ e'
/-- The proof that `e` splits into the coefficient `k` and the monic monomial `e'`. -/
p : Q($e = $e' * $k)
theorem coeff_one (k : ℕ) : k.rawCast = (nat_lit 1).rawCast * k := by simp
theorem coeff_mul {a₃ c₂ k : ℕ}
(a₁ a₂ : ℕ) (_ : a₃ = c₂ * k) : a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ = (a₁ ^ a₂ * c₂) * k := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
/-- Given a monomial expression `va`, splits off the leading coefficient `k` and the remainder
`e'`, stored in the `ExtractCoeff` structure.
* `c = 1 * c` (if `c` is a constant)
* `a * b = (a * b') * k` if `b = b' * k`
-/
def extractCoeff {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : ExtractCoeff a :=
match va with
| .const _ _ =>
have k : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
⟨k, q((nat_lit 1).rawCast), .const 1, (q(coeff_one $k) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ =>
let ⟨k, _, vc, pc⟩ := extractCoeff va₃
⟨k, _, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, q(coeff_mul $a₁ $a₂ $pc)⟩
theorem pow_one_cast (a : R) : a ^ (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp
theorem zero_pow {b : ℕ} (_ : 0 < b) : (0 : R) ^ b = 0 := match b with | b+1 => by simp [pow_succ]
theorem single_pow {b : ℕ} (_ : (a : R) ^ b = c) : (a + 0) ^ b = c + 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem pow_nat {b c k : ℕ} {d e : R} (_ : b = c * k) (_ : a ^ c = d) (_ : d ^ k = e) :
(a : R) ^ b = e := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_mul]
/-- Exponentiates a polynomial `va` by a monomial `vb`, including several special cases.
* `a ^ 1 = a`
* `0 ^ e = 0` if `0 < e`
* `(a + 0) ^ b = a ^ b` computed using `evalPowProd`
* `a ^ b = (a ^ b') ^ k` if `b = b' * k` and `k > 1`
Otherwise `a ^ b` is just encoded as `a ^ b * 1 + 0` using `evalPowAtom`.
-/
partial def evalPow₁ {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
match va, vb with
| va, .const 1 =>
haveI : $b =Q Nat.rawCast (nat_lit 1) := ⟨⟩
return ⟨_, va, q(pow_one_cast $a)⟩
| .zero, vb => match vb.evalPos with
| some p => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_pow (R := $α) $p)⟩
| none => return evalPowAtom sα (.sum .zero) vb
| ExSum.add va .zero, vb => -- TODO: using `.add` here takes a while to compile?
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalPowProd sα va vb
return ⟨_, vc.toSum, q(single_pow $pc)⟩
| va, vb =>
if vb.coeff > 1 then
let ⟨k, _, vc, pc⟩ := extractCoeff vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalPow₁ va vc
let ⟨_, ve, pe⟩ ← evalPowNat sα vd k
return ⟨_, ve, q(pow_nat $pc $pd $pe)⟩
else
return evalPowAtom sα (.sum va) vb
theorem pow_zero (a : R) : a ^ 0 = (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
theorem pow_add {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} {d : R}
(_ : a ^ b₁ = c₁) (_ : a ^ b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ * c₂ = d) : (a : R) ^ (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.pow_add]
/-- Exponentiates two polynomials `va, vb`.
* `a ^ 0 = 1`
* `a ^ (b₁ + b₂) = a ^ b₁ * a ^ b₂`
-/
def evalPow {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, (ExProd.mkNat sα 1).2.toSum, q(pow_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalPow₁ sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalPow va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalMul sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(pow_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
/-- This cache contains data required by the `ring` tactic during execution. -/
structure Cache {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) where
/-- A ring instance on `α`, if available. -/
rα : Option Q(Ring $α)
/-- A division ring instance on `α`, if available. -/
dα : Option Q(DivisionRing $α)
/-- A characteristic zero ring instance on `α`, if available. -/
| czα : Option Q(CharZero $α)
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 897 | 898 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
/-!
# Gershgorin's circle theorem
This file gives the proof of Gershgorin's circle theorem `eigenvalue_mem_ball` on the eigenvalues
of matrices and some applications.
## Reference
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gershgorin_circle_theorem
-/
variable {K n : Type*} [NormedField K] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n K}
/-- **Gershgorin's circle theorem**: for any eigenvalue `μ` of a square matrix `A`, there exists an
index `k` such that `μ` lies in the closed ball of center the diagonal term `A k k` and of
radius the sum of the norms `∑ j ≠ k, ‖A k j‖. -/
theorem eigenvalue_mem_ball {μ : K} (hμ : Module.End.HasEigenvalue (Matrix.toLin' A) μ) :
∃ k, μ ∈ Metric.closedBall (A k k) (∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A k j‖) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· exfalso
exact hμ Submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
· obtain ⟨v, h_eg, h_nz⟩ := hμ.exists_hasEigenvector
obtain ⟨i, -, h_i⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup' Finset.univ_nonempty (fun i => ‖v i‖)
have h_nz : v i ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h_nz
ext j
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
refine (h_i ▸ Finset.le_sup' (fun i => ‖v i‖) (Finset.mem_univ j)).trans ?_
exact norm_le_zero_iff.mpr h_nz
have h_le : ∀ j, ‖v j * (v i)⁻¹‖ ≤ 1 := fun j => by
rw [norm_mul, norm_inv, mul_inv_le_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h_nz), one_mul]
exact h_i ▸ Finset.le_sup' (fun i => ‖v i‖) (Finset.mem_univ j)
simp_rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
refine ⟨i, ?_⟩
calc
_ = ‖(A i i * v i - μ * v i) * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by congr; field_simp [h_nz]; ring
_ = ‖(A i i * v i - ∑ j, A i j * v j) * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by
rw [show μ * v i = ∑ x : n, A i x * v x by
rw [← dotProduct, ← Matrix.mulVec]
exact (congrFun (Module.End.mem_eigenspace_iff.mp h_eg) i).symm]
_ = ‖(∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, A i j * v j) * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by
rw [Finset.sum_erase_eq_sub (Finset.mem_univ i), ← neg_sub, neg_mul, norm_neg]
_ ≤ ∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, ‖A i j‖ * ‖v j * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by
rw [Finset.sum_mul]
exact (norm_sum_le _ _).trans (le_of_eq (by simp_rw [mul_assoc, norm_mul]))
_ ≤ ∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, ‖A i j‖ :=
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => mul_le_of_le_one_right (norm_nonneg _) (h_le j))
/-- If `A` is a row strictly dominant diagonal matrix, then it's determinant is nonzero. -/
theorem det_ne_zero_of_sum_row_lt_diag (h : ∀ k, ∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A k j‖ < ‖A k k‖) :
A.det ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h
suffices ∃ k, 0 ∈ Metric.closedBall (A k k) (∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A k j‖) by
exact this.imp (fun a h ↦ by rwa [mem_closedBall_iff_norm', sub_zero] at h)
refine eigenvalue_mem_ball ?_
rw [Module.End.hasEigenvalue_iff, Module.End.eigenspace_zero, ne_comm]
exact ne_of_lt (LinearMap.bot_lt_ker_of_det_eq_zero (by rwa [LinearMap.det_toLin']))
/-- If `A` is a column strictly dominant diagonal matrix, then it's determinant is nonzero. -/
| theorem det_ne_zero_of_sum_col_lt_diag (h : ∀ k, ∑ i ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A i k‖ < ‖A k k‖) :
A.det ≠ 0 := by
rw [← Matrix.det_transpose]
exact det_ne_zero_of_sum_row_lt_diag (by simp_rw [Matrix.transpose_apply]; exact h)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Gershgorin.lean | 69 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
/-!
# Square root of a real number
In this file we define
* `NNReal.sqrt` to be the square root of a nonnegative real number.
* `Real.sqrt` to be the square root of a real number, defined to be zero on negative numbers.
Then we prove some basic properties of these functions.
## Implementation notes
We define `NNReal.sqrt` as the noncomputable inverse to the function `x ↦ x * x`. We use general
theory of inverses of strictly monotone functions to prove that `NNReal.sqrt x` exists. As a side
effect, `NNReal.sqrt` is a bundled `OrderIso`, so for `NNReal` numbers we get continuity as well as
theorems like `NNReal.sqrt x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y * y` for free.
Then we define `Real.sqrt x` to be `NNReal.sqrt (Real.toNNReal x)`.
## Tags
square root
-/
open Set Filter
open scoped Filter NNReal Topology
namespace NNReal
variable {x y : ℝ≥0}
/-- Square root of a nonnegative real number. -/
-- Porting note (kmill): `pp_nodot` has no effect here
-- unless RFC https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/6178 leads to dot notation pp for CoeFun
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def sqrt : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
OrderIso.symm <| powOrderIso 2 two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma sq_sqrt (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x ^ 2 = x := sqrt.symm_apply_apply _
@[simp] lemma sqrt_sq (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x ^ 2) = x := sqrt.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp] lemma mul_self_sqrt (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x * sqrt x = x := by rw [← sq, sq_sqrt]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_mul_self (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x * x) = x := by rw [← sq, sqrt_sq]
lemma sqrt_le_sqrt : sqrt x ≤ sqrt y ↔ x ≤ y := sqrt.le_iff_le
lemma sqrt_lt_sqrt : sqrt x < sqrt y ↔ x < y := sqrt.lt_iff_lt
lemma sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq : sqrt x = y ↔ x = y ^ 2 := sqrt.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
lemma sqrt_le_iff_le_sq : sqrt x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ 2 := sqrt.to_galoisConnection _ _
lemma le_sqrt_iff_sq_le : x ≤ sqrt y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y := (sqrt.symm.to_galoisConnection _ _).symm
@[simp] lemma sqrt_eq_zero : sqrt x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_eq_one : sqrt x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by simp [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_zero : sqrt 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma sqrt_one : sqrt 1 = 1 := by simp
@[simp] lemma sqrt_le_one : sqrt x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt, sqrt_one]
@[simp] lemma one_le_sqrt : 1 ≤ sqrt x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt, sqrt_one]
theorem sqrt_mul (x y : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x * y) = sqrt x * sqrt y := by
rw [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow, sq_sqrt, sq_sqrt]
/-- `NNReal.sqrt` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
noncomputable def sqrtHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ≥0 :=
⟨⟨sqrt, sqrt_zero⟩, sqrt_one, sqrt_mul⟩
theorem sqrt_inv (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x⁻¹ = (sqrt x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ sqrtHom x
theorem sqrt_div (x y : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x / y) = sqrt x / sqrt y :=
map_div₀ sqrtHom x y
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sqrt : Continuous sqrt := sqrt.continuous
@[simp] theorem sqrt_pos : 0 < sqrt x ↔ 0 < x := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
alias ⟨_, sqrt_pos_of_pos⟩ := sqrt_pos
attribute [bound] sqrt_pos_of_pos
end NNReal
namespace Real
/-- The square root of a real number. This returns 0 for negative inputs.
This has notation `√x`. Note that `√x⁻¹` is parsed as `√(x⁻¹)`. -/
noncomputable def sqrt (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
NNReal.sqrt (Real.toNNReal x)
-- TODO: replace this with a typeclass
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:max "√" => Real.sqrt
variable {x y : ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sqrt {x : ℝ≥0} : (NNReal.sqrt x : ℝ) = √(x : ℝ) := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.toNNReal_coe]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sqrt : Continuous (√· : ℝ → ℝ) :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp <| NNReal.continuous_sqrt.comp continuous_real_toNNReal
theorem sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (h : x ≤ 0) : sqrt x = 0 := by simp [sqrt, Real.toNNReal_eq_zero.2 h]
@[simp] theorem sqrt_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ √x := NNReal.coe_nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_sqrt (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x * √x = x := by
rw [Real.sqrt, ← NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.mul_self_sqrt, Real.coe_toNNReal _ h]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_mul_self (h : 0 ≤ x) : √(x * x) = x :=
(mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) h).1 (mul_self_sqrt (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem sqrt_eq_cases : √x = y ↔ y * y = x ∧ 0 ≤ y ∨ x < 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hle | hlt
· exact Or.inl ⟨mul_self_sqrt hle, sqrt_nonneg x⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hlt, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hlt.le⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [sqrt_mul_self hy, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx.le]
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = y ↔ x = y * y :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_self_sqrt hx], fun h => by rw [h, sqrt_mul_self hy]⟩
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq_of_pos (h : 0 < y) : √x = y ↔ y * y = x := by
simp [sqrt_eq_cases, h.ne', h.le]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_eq_one : √x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
calc
√x = 1 ↔ 1 * 1 = x := sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq_of_pos zero_lt_one
_ ↔ x = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem sq_sqrt (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x ^ 2 = x := by rw [sq, mul_self_sqrt h]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_sq (h : 0 ≤ x) : √(x ^ 2) = x := by rw [sq, sqrt_mul_self h]
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = y ↔ x = y ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq hx hy]
theorem sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : √(x * x) = |x| := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self x, sqrt_mul_self (abs_nonneg _)]
theorem sqrt_sq_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : √(x ^ 2) = |x| := by rw [sq, sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_zero : √0 = 0 := by simp [Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_one : √1 = 1 := by simp [Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x ≤ √y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.sqrt_le_sqrt, toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff hy]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √x < √y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (sqrt_le_sqrt_iff hx)
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 < y) : √x < √y ↔ x < y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.sqrt_lt_sqrt, toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff hy]
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt (h : x ≤ y) : √x ≤ √y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.sqrt_le_sqrt]
exact toNNReal_le_toNNReal h
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : x < y) : √x < √y :=
(sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff hx).2 h
theorem sqrt_le_left (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ 2 := by
rw [sqrt, ← Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hy, NNReal.sqrt_le_iff_le_sq, sq, ← Real.toNNReal_mul hy,
Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff (mul_self_nonneg y), sq]
theorem sqrt_le_iff : √x ≤ y ↔ 0 ≤ y ∧ x ≤ y ^ 2 := by
rw [← and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (sqrt_nonneg x).trans h, and_congr_right_iff]
exact sqrt_le_left
theorem sqrt_lt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x < y ↔ x < y ^ 2 := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff hx, sqrt_sq hy]
theorem sqrt_lt' (hy : 0 < y) : √x < y ↔ x < y ^ 2 := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (pow_pos hy _), sqrt_sq hy.le]
/-- Note: if you want to conclude `x ≤ √y`, then use `Real.le_sqrt_of_sq_le`.
If you have `x > 0`, consider using `Real.le_sqrt'` -/
theorem le_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : x ≤ √y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| sqrt_lt hy hx
theorem le_sqrt' (hx : 0 < x) : x ≤ √y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| sqrt_lt' hx
theorem abs_le_sqrt (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : |x| ≤ √y := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs]; exact sqrt_le_sqrt h
theorem sq_le (h : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ 2 ≤ y ↔ -√y ≤ x ∧ x ≤ √y := by
constructor
· simpa only [abs_le] using abs_le_sqrt
· rw [← abs_le, ← sq_abs]
exact (le_sqrt (abs_nonneg x) h).mp
theorem neg_sqrt_le_of_sq_le (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : -√y ≤ x :=
((sq_le ((sq_nonneg x).trans h)).mp h).1
theorem le_sqrt_of_sq_le (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : x ≤ √y :=
((sq_le ((sq_nonneg x).trans h)).mp h).2
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_inj (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = √y ↔ x = y := by
simp [le_antisymm_iff, hx, hy]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_eq_zero (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simpa using sqrt_inj h le_rfl
theorem sqrt_eq_zero' : √x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by
rw [sqrt, NNReal.coe_eq_zero, NNReal.sqrt_eq_zero, Real.toNNReal_eq_zero]
theorem sqrt_ne_zero (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by rw [not_iff_not, sqrt_eq_zero h]
theorem sqrt_ne_zero' : √x ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← not_le, not_iff_not, sqrt_eq_zero']
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_pos : 0 < √x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (Iff.trans (by simp [le_antisymm_iff, sqrt_nonneg]) sqrt_eq_zero')
alias ⟨_, sqrt_pos_of_pos⟩ := sqrt_pos
lemma sqrt_le_sqrt_iff' (hx : 0 < x) : √x ≤ √y ↔ x ≤ y := by
obtain hy | hy := le_total y 0
· exact iff_of_false ((sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hy).trans_lt <| sqrt_pos.2 hx).not_le
(hy.trans_lt hx).not_le
· exact sqrt_le_sqrt_iff hy
@[simp] lemma one_le_sqrt : 1 ≤ √x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt_iff' zero_lt_one, sqrt_one]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_le_one : √x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt_iff zero_le_one, sqrt_one]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: a square root of a strictly positive nonnegative real is
positive. -/
@[positivity NNReal.sqrt _]
def evalNNRealSqrt : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(NNReal), ~q(NNReal.sqrt $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| | .positive pa => pure (.positive q(NNReal.sqrt_pos_of_pos $pa))
| _ => failure -- this case is dealt with by generic nonnegativity of nnreals
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Sqrt.lean | 280 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Theory of sieves
- For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X`
which is closed under left-composition.
- The complete lattice structure on sieves is given, as well as the Galois insertion
given by downward-closing.
- A `Sieve X` (functorially) induces a presheaf on `C` together with a monomorphism to
the yoneda embedding of `X`.
## Tags
sieve, pullback
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
/-- A set of arrows all with codomain `X`. -/
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting of arrows which belong to a
presieve on `X`. -/
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
/-- Construct an object of `P.category`. -/
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated diagram `S.diagram` is defined to be
the natural functor from the full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting
of arrows in `S` to `C`. -/
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
ObjectProperty.ι _ ⋙ Over.forget X
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated cocone `S.cocone` is defined to be
the natural cocone over the diagram defined above with cocone point `X`. -/
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (ObjectProperty.ι _)
/-- Given a set of arrows `S` all with codomain `X`, and a set of arrows with codomain `Y` for each
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S`, produce a set of arrows with codomain `X`:
`{ g ≫ f | (f : Y ⟶ X) ∈ S, (g : Z ⟶ Y) ∈ R f }`.
-/
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Presieve.bind S R h`. -/
structure BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) where
/-- the intermediate object -/
Y : C
/-- a morphism in the family of presieves `R` -/
g : Z ⟶ Y
/-- a morphism in the presieve `S` -/
f : Y ⟶ X
hf : S f
hg : R hf g
fac : g ≫ f = h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BindStruct.fac
/-- If a morphism `h` satisfies `Presieve.bind S R h`, this is a choice of a structure
in `BindStruct S R h`. -/
noncomputable def bind.bindStruct {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (H : bind S R h) : BindStruct S R h :=
Nonempty.some (by
obtain ⟨Y, g, f, hf, hg, fac⟩ := H
exact ⟨{ hf := hf, hg := hg, fac := fac, .. }⟩)
lemma BindStruct.bind {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (b : BindStruct S R h) : bind S R h :=
⟨b.Y, b.g, b.f, b.hf, b.hg, b.fac⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
/-- Pullback a set of arrows with given codomain along a fixed map, by taking the pullback in the
category.
This is not the same as the arrow set of `Sieve.pullback`, but there is a relation between them
in `pullbackArrows_comm`.
-/
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd h f)
theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd g f) := by
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
/-- Construct the presieve given by the family of arrows indexed by `ι`. -/
inductive ofArrows {ι : Type*} (Y : ι → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) : Presieve X
| mk (i : ι) : ofArrows _ _ (f i)
theorem ofArrows_pUnit : (ofArrows _ fun _ : PUnit => f) = singleton f := by
funext Y
ext g
constructor
· rintro ⟨_⟩
apply singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact ofArrows.mk PUnit.unit
theorem ofArrows_pullback [HasPullbacks C] {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X) :
(ofArrows (fun i => pullback (g i) f) fun _ => pullback.snd _ _) =
pullbackArrows f (ofArrows Z g) := by
funext T
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨hk⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk _ _ (ofArrows.mk hk)
· rintro ⟨W, k, ⟨_⟩⟩
apply ofArrows.mk
theorem ofArrows_bind {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X)
(j : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), ofArrows Z g f → Type*) (W : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H), j f H → C)
(k : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H i), W f H i ⟶ Y) :
((ofArrows Z g).bind fun _ f H => ofArrows (W f H) (k f H)) =
ofArrows (fun i : Σi, j _ (ofArrows.mk i) => W (g i.1) _ i.2) fun ij =>
k (g ij.1) _ ij.2 ≫ g ij.1 := by
funext Y
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, _, ⟨i⟩, ⟨i'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ofArrows.mk (Sigma.mk _ _)
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact bind_comp _ (ofArrows.mk _) (ofArrows.mk _)
theorem ofArrows_surj {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ X)
(hg : ofArrows Y f g) : ∃ (i : ι) (h : Y i = Z),
g = eqToHom h.symm ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, rfl, by simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `F(X)`, we can define a presieve on `X` by taking the preimage via `F`. -/
def functorPullback (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) : Presieve X := fun _ f => R (F.map f)
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_mem (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
R.functorPullback F f ↔ R (F.map f) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_id (R : Presieve X) : R.functorPullback (𝟭 _) = R :=
rfl
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `X`, the predicate `R.hasPullbacks` means that for all arrows `f` and
`g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
class hasPullbacks (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
/-- For all arrows `f` and `g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
has_pullbacks : ∀ {Y Z} {f : Y ⟶ X} (_ : R f) {g : Z ⟶ X} (_ : R g), HasPullback f g
instance (R : Presieve X) [HasPullbacks C] : R.hasPullbacks := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
instance {α : Type v₂} {X : α → C} {B : C} (π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B)
[(Presieve.ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks] (a b : α) : HasPullback (π a) (π b) :=
Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _) (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _)
section FunctorPushforward
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, we can define a presieve on `F(X)` (which is actually a sieve)
by taking the sieve generated by the image via `F`.
-/
def functorPushforward (S : Presieve X) : Presieve (F.obj X) := fun Y f =>
∃ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ F.obj Z), S g ∧ f = h ≫ F.map g
/-- An auxiliary definition in order to fix the choice of the preimages between various definitions.
-/
structure FunctorPushforwardStructure (S : Presieve X) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ F.obj X) where
/-- an object in the source category -/
preobj : C
/-- a map in the source category which has to be in the presieve -/
premap : preobj ⟶ X
/-- the morphism which appear in the factorisation -/
lift : Y ⟶ F.obj preobj
/-- the condition that `premap` is in the presieve -/
cover : S premap
/-- the factorisation of the morphism -/
fac : f = lift ≫ F.map premap
/-- The fixed choice of a preimage. -/
noncomputable def getFunctorPushforwardStructure {F : C ⥤ D} {S : Presieve X} {Y : D}
{f : Y ⟶ F.obj X} (h : S.functorPushforward F f) : FunctorPushforwardStructure F S f := by
choose Z f' g h₁ h using h
exact ⟨Z, f', g, h₁, h⟩
theorem functorPushforward_comp (R : Presieve X) :
R.functorPushforward (F ⋙ G) = (R.functorPushforward F).functorPushforward G := by
funext x
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨F.obj X, F.map f₁, g₁, ⟨X, f₁, 𝟙 _, h₁, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, ⟨X', f₂, g₂, h₁, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨X', f₂, g₁ ≫ G.map g₂, h₁, by simp⟩
theorem image_mem_functorPushforward (R : Presieve X) {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : R f) :
R.functorPushforward F (F.map f) :=
⟨Y, f, 𝟙 _, h, by simp⟩
end FunctorPushforward
end Presieve
/--
For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X` which is closed under
left-composition.
-/
structure Sieve {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (X : C) where
/-- the underlying presieve -/
arrows : Presieve X
/-- stability by precomposition -/
downward_closed : ∀ {Y Z f} (_ : arrows f) (g : Z ⟶ Y), arrows (g ≫ f)
namespace Sieve
instance : CoeFun (Sieve X) fun _ => Presieve X :=
⟨Sieve.arrows⟩
initialize_simps_projections Sieve (arrows → apply)
variable {S R : Sieve X}
attribute [simp] downward_closed
theorem arrows_ext : ∀ {R S : Sieve X}, R.arrows = S.arrows → R = S := by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl
rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {R S : Sieve X} (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f ↔ S f) : R = S :=
arrows_ext <| funext fun _ => funext fun f => propext <| h f
open Lattice
/-- The supremum of a collection of sieves: the union of them all. -/
protected def sup (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∃ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ f} hf _ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS, hf⟩ := hf
exact ⟨S, hS, S.downward_closed hf _⟩
/-- The infimum of a collection of sieves: the intersection of them all. -/
protected def inf (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∀ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ _} hf g S H := S.downward_closed (hf S H) g
/-- The union of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def union (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∨ R f
downward_closed := by rintro _ _ _ (h | h) g <;> simp [h]
/-- The intersection of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def inter (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∧ R f
downward_closed := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ g
simp [h₁, h₂]
/-- Sieves on an object `X` form a complete lattice.
We generate this directly rather than using the galois insertion for nicer definitional properties.
-/
instance : CompleteLattice (Sieve X) where
le S R := ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S f → R f
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ S₁₂ S₂₃ _ _ h := S₂₃ _ (S₁₂ _ h)
le_antisymm _ _ p q := Sieve.ext fun _ _ => ⟨p _, q _⟩
top :=
{ arrows := fun _ => Set.univ
downward_closed := fun _ _ => ⟨⟩ }
bot :=
{ arrows := fun _ => ∅
downward_closed := False.elim }
sup := Sieve.union
inf := Sieve.inter
sSup := Sieve.sup
sInf := Sieve.inf
le_sSup _ S hS _ _ hf := ⟨S, hS, hf⟩
sSup_le := fun _ _ ha _ _ ⟨b, hb, hf⟩ => (ha b hb) _ hf
sInf_le _ _ hS _ _ h := h _ hS
le_sInf _ _ hS _ _ hf _ hR := hS _ hR _ hf
le_sup_left _ _ _ _ := Or.inl
le_sup_right _ _ _ _ := Or.inr
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ f := by--ℰ S hS Y f := by
rintro (hf | hf)
· exact h₁ _ hf
· exact h₂ _ hf
inf_le_left _ _ _ _ := And.left
inf_le_right _ _ _ _ := And.right
le_inf _ _ _ p q _ _ z := ⟨p _ z, q _ z⟩
le_top _ _ _ _ := trivial
bot_le _ _ _ := False.elim
/-- The maximal sieve always exists. -/
instance sieveInhabited : Inhabited (Sieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[simp]
theorem sInf_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sInf Ss f ↔ ∀ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sSup Ss f ↔ ∃ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f := by
simp [sSup, Sieve.sup, setOf]
@[simp]
theorem inter_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊓ S) f ↔ R f ∧ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊔ S) f ↔ R f ∨ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply (f : Y ⟶ X) : (⊤ : Sieve X) f :=
trivial
/-- Generate the smallest sieve containing the given set of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def generate (R : Presieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows Z f := ∃ (Y : _) (h : Z ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ X), R g ∧ h ≫ g = f
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z _ ⟨W, g, f, hf, rfl⟩ h
exact ⟨_, h ≫ g, _, hf, by simp⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, and a sieve on each domain of an arrow in the presieve, we can bind to
produce a sieve on `X`.
-/
@[simps]
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y) : Sieve X where
arrows := S.bind fun _ _ h => R h
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z f ⟨W, f, h, hh, hf, rfl⟩ g
exact ⟨_, g ≫ f, _, hh, by simp [hf]⟩
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Sieve.bind S R h`. -/
abbrev BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) :=
Presieve.BindStruct S (fun _ _ hf ↦ R hf) h
open Order Lattice
theorem generate_le_iff (R : Presieve X) (S : Sieve X) : generate R ≤ S ↔ R ≤ S :=
⟨fun H _ _ hg => H _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hg, id_comp _⟩, fun ss Y f => by
rintro ⟨Z, f, g, hg, rfl⟩
exact S.downward_closed (ss Z hg) f⟩
/-- Show that there is a galois insertion (generate, set_over). -/
def giGenerate : GaloisInsertion (generate : Presieve X → Sieve X) arrows where
gc := generate_le_iff
choice 𝒢 _ := generate 𝒢
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
le_l_u _ _ _ hf := ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hf, id_comp _⟩
theorem le_generate (R : Presieve X) : R ≤ generate R :=
giGenerate.gc.le_u_l R
@[simp]
theorem generate_sieve (S : Sieve X) : generate S = S :=
giGenerate.l_u_eq S
/-- If the identity arrow is in a sieve, the sieve is maximal. -/
theorem id_mem_iff_eq_top : S (𝟙 X) ↔ S = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => top_unique fun Y f _ => by simpa using downward_closed _ h f, fun h => h.symm ▸ trivial⟩
/-- If an arrow set contains a split epi, it generates the maximal sieve. -/
theorem generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi {R : Presieve X} (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] (hf : R f) :
generate R = ⊤ := by
rw [← id_mem_iff_eq_top]
exact ⟨_, section_ f, f, hf, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] :
generate (Presieve.singleton f) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi f (Presieve.singleton_self _)
@[simp]
theorem generate_top : generate (⊤ : Presieve X) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi (𝟙 _) ⟨⟩
@[simp]
lemma comp_mem_iff (i : X ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso i] (S : Sieve Z) :
S (i ≫ f) ↔ S f := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ S.downward_closed H _⟩
convert S.downward_closed H (inv i)
simp
section
variable {I : Type*} {X : C} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X)
/-- The sieve of `X` generated by family of morphisms `Y i ⟶ X`. -/
abbrev ofArrows : Sieve X := generate (Presieve.ofArrows Y f)
lemma ofArrows_mk (i : I) : ofArrows Y f (f i) :=
⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, ⟨i⟩, by simp⟩
lemma mem_ofArrows_iff {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f g ↔ ∃ (i : I) (a : W ⟶ Y i), g = a ≫ f i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨T, a, b, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
apply downward_closed _ (ofArrows_mk Y f i)
variable {Y f} {W : C} {g : W ⟶ X} (hg : ofArrows Y f g)
include hg in
lemma ofArrows.exists : ∃ (i : I) (h : W ⟶ Y i), g = h ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨_, h, _, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, h, rfl⟩
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a choice of `i` such that `g`
factors through `f i`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.i : I := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a morphism `h : W ⟶ Y (i hg)` such
that `h ≫ f (i hg) = g`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.h : W ⟶ Y (i hg) := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ofArrows.fac : h hg ≫ f (i hg) = g :=
(ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose_spec.symm
end
/-- The sieve generated by two morphisms. -/
abbrev ofTwoArrows {U V X : C} (i : U ⟶ X) (j : V ⟶ X) : Sieve X :=
Sieve.ofArrows (Y := pairFunction U V) (fun k ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn k i j)
/-- The sieve of `X : C` that is generated by a family of objects `Y : I → C`:
it consists of morphisms to `X` which factor through at least one of the `Y i`. -/
def ofObjects {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (X : C) : Sieve X where
arrows Z _ := ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i)
downward_closed := by
rintro Z₁ Z₂ p ⟨i, ⟨f⟩⟩ g
exact ⟨i, ⟨g ≫ f⟩⟩
lemma mem_ofObjects_iff {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {Z X : C} (g : Z ⟶ X) :
ofObjects Y X g ↔ ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i) := by rfl
lemma ofArrows_le_ofObjects
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {X : C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) :
Sieve.ofArrows Y f ≤ Sieve.ofObjects Y X := by
intro W g hg
rw [mem_ofArrows_iff] at hg
obtain ⟨i, a, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, ⟨a⟩⟩
lemma ofArrows_eq_ofObjects {X : C} (hX : IsTerminal X)
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f = ofObjects Y X := by
refine le_antisymm (ofArrows_le_ofObjects Y f) (fun W g => ?_)
rw [mem_ofArrows_iff, mem_ofObjects_iff]
rintro ⟨i, ⟨h⟩⟩
exact ⟨i, h, hX.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Given a morphism `h : Y ⟶ X`, send a sieve S on X to a sieve on Y
as the inverse image of S with `_ ≫ h`.
That is, `Sieve.pullback S h := (≫ h) '⁻¹ S`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (h : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) : Sieve Y where
arrows _ sl := S (sl ≫ h)
downward_closed g := by simp [g]
@[simp]
theorem pullback_id : S.pullback (𝟙 _) = S := by simp [Sieve.ext_iff]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 530 | 531 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is locally closed (e.g. open or closed), then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is
integrable on every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf k hk ↦ hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs with ⟨U, Z, hU, hZ, rfl⟩
rcases exists_compact_subset hU hx.1 with ⟨K, hK, hxK, hKU⟩
rw [nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hU.mem_nhds hx.1)]
refine ⟨Z ∩ K, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hxK), ?_⟩
exact hf (Z ∩ K) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨hKU hy.2, hy.1⟩) (.inter_left hK hZ)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
/-- If `s` is closed, being locally integrable on `s` wrt `μ` is equivalent to being locally
integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`. For the one-way implication without assuming `s` closed,
see `locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hs : IsClosed s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x => ?_, locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict⟩
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, ht_nhds, ht_int⟩ := hf x h
obtain ⟨u, hu_o, hu_x, hu_sub⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht_nhds
refine ⟨u, hu_o.mem_nhds hu_x, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet]
exact ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
· rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at hs
refine ⟨sᶜ, hs.mem_nhds h, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict, inter_comm, inter_compl_self, ← IntegrableOn]
exacts [integrableOn_empty, hs.measurableSet]
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on any compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact {k : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hk : IsCompact k) : IntegrableOn f k μ :=
(hf.locallyIntegrableOn k).integrableOn_isCompact hk
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on an open neighborhood of any
compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {k : Set X}
(hk : IsCompact k) : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ k ⊆ u ∧ IntegrableOn f u μ := by
refine IsCompact.induction_on hk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine ⟨∅, isOpen_empty, Subset.rfl, integrableOn_empty⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨u, u_open, tu, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, hst.trans tu, hu⟩
· rintro s t ⟨u, u_open, su, hu⟩ ⟨v, v_open, tv, hv⟩
exact ⟨u ∪ v, u_open.union v_open, union_subset_union su tv, hu.union hv⟩
· intro x _
rcases hf x with ⟨u, ux, hu⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ux with ⟨v, vu, v_open, xv⟩
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv), v, v_open, Subset.rfl, hu.mono_set vu⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] :
LocallyIntegrable f μ ↔ ∀ k : Set X, IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ :=
⟨fun hf _k hk => hf.integrableOn_isCompact hk, fun hf x =>
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨K, h2K, hf K hK⟩⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
simpa only [restrict_univ] using (locallyIntegrableOn_univ.mpr hf).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If a function is locally integrable in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets covering the space on which it is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ ((⋃ n, u n) = univ) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n) μ) := by
rcases (hf.locallyIntegrableOn univ).exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_union, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, eq_univ_of_univ_subset u_union, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [inter_univ] using hu n
theorem MemLp.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : X → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
have : Fact (μ U < ⊤) := ⟨h'U⟩
refine ⟨U, hU, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
apply (hf.restrict U).mono_exponent hp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.locallyIntegrable := MemLp.locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ :=
(memLp_top_const c).locallyIntegrable le_top
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ => c) s μ :=
(locallyIntegrable_const c).locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem locallyIntegrable_zero : LocallyIntegrable (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) μ :=
(integrable_zero X E μ).locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_zero : LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) s μ :=
locallyIntegrable_zero.locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem LocallyIntegrable.indicator (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : LocallyIntegrable (s.indicator f) μ := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
exact ⟨U, hU, h'U.indicator hs⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_map_homeomorph [BorelSpace X] [BorelSpace Y] (e : X ≃ₜ Y) {f : Y → E}
{μ : Measure X} : LocallyIntegrable f (Measure.map e μ) ↔ LocallyIntegrable (f ∘ e) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x => ?_⟩
· rcases h (e x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e ⁻¹' U, e.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
exact (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).1 h'U
· rcases h (e.symm x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e.symm ⁻¹' U, e.symm.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
apply (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).2
simp only [Homeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv_coe]
convert h'U
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Homeomorph.symm_apply_apply]
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.add (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f + g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).add (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.sub (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f - g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).sub (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (-f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).neg
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
LocallyIntegrable (c • f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).smul c
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Finset.sum_induction f (fun g => LocallyIntegrable g μ) (fun _ _ => LocallyIntegrable.add)
locallyIntegrable_zero hf
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (fun a ↦ ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by
simpa only [← Finset.sum_apply] using locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' s hf
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `g • f` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_left_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → ℝ} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ g x • f x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ g x • f x) = (fun x ↦ g x • f x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_right
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `f • g` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_right_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X] {f : X → ℝ} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
{g : X → E} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ f x • g x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ f x • g x) = (fun x ↦ f x • g x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul_left]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_left
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
open Filter
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact :
Integrable f μ ↔ (IntegrableAtFilter f (cocompact X) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ) := by
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsc, hs⟩, hloc⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, htc, ht⟩ := mem_cocompact'.mp hsc
rewrite [← integrableOn_univ, ← compl_union_self s, integrableOn_union]
exact ⟨(hloc.integrableOn_isCompact htc).mono ht le_rfl, hs⟩
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔
(IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ) ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.integrableAtFilter _⟩, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact (IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff.mpr h.1).filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot_atTop
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [OrderTop X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact h.1.filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [OrderBot X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
variable {a : X}
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
haveI : Nonempty X := Nonempty.intro a
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hs.mono ha' le_rfl, ?_⟩).mono Iic_subset_Iic_union_Icc le_rfl
exact h.integrableOn_compact_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self isCompact_Icc
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
theorem integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMinOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[<] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨Iio a, Iio_mem_atBot a, h⟩, ⟨Iio a, self_mem_nhdsWithin, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩
· intro ⟨hbot, ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, hlocal⟩
obtain ⟨s', ⟨hs'_mono, hs'⟩⟩ := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨?_, hs.mono hs' le_rfl⟩).mono Iio_subset_Iic_union_Ioo le_rfl
exact integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot.mpr
⟨hbot, hlocal.mono_set (Iic_subset_Iio.mpr hs'_mono)⟩
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMaxOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[>] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ :=
integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin (X := Xᵒᵈ)
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
section borel
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
variable {K : Set X} {a b : X}
/-- A continuous function `f` is locally integrable with respect to any locally finite measure. -/
theorem Continuous.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X E]
(hf : Continuous f) : LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
hf.integrableAt_nhds
/-- A function `f` continuous on a set `K` is locally integrable on this set with respect
to any locally finite measure. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X E] (hf : ContinuousOn f K)
(hK : MeasurableSet K) : LocallyIntegrableOn f K μ := fun _x hx =>
hf.integrableAt_nhdsWithin hK hx
variable [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ]
/-- A function `f` continuous on a compact set `K` is integrable on this set with respect to any
locally finite measure. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact'
(hK : IsCompact K) (h'K : MeasurableSet K) (hf : ContinuousOn f K) :
IntegrableOn f K μ := by
refine ⟨ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact hf hK h'K, ?_⟩
have : Fact (μ K < ∞) := ⟨hK.measure_lt_top⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ f '' K, ‖x‖ ≤ C :=
IsBounded.exists_norm_le (hK.image_of_continuousOn hf).isBounded
apply hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded (C := C)
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem h'K] with x hx using hC _ (mem_image_of_mem f hx)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact [T2Space X]
(hK : IsCompact K) (hf : ContinuousOn f K) : IntegrableOn f K μ :=
hf.integrableOn_compact' hK hK.measurableSet
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_Icc [Preorder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ :=
hf.integrableOn_compact isCompact_Icc
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_Icc [Preorder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ :=
hf.continuousOn.integrableOn_Icc
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_Ioc [Preorder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Icc.mono_set Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_uIcc [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]]) : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Icc
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_uIcc [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Icc
open scoped Interval in
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_uIoc [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Ioc
/-- A continuous function with compact support is integrable on the whole space. -/
theorem Continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport (hf : Continuous f) (hcf : HasCompactSupport f) :
Integrable f μ :=
(integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset (subset_tsupport f)).mp <|
hf.continuousOn.integrableOn_compact' hcf (isClosed_tsupport _).measurableSet
end borel
open scoped ENNReal
section Monotone
variable [BorelSpace X] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder X] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder E]
[OrderTopology X] [OrderTopology E] [SecondCountableTopology E] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem MonotoneOn.memLp_top (hmono : MonotoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f ∞ (μ.restrict s) := by
borelize E
have hbelow : BddBelow (f '' s) := ⟨f a, fun x ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ => hyx ▸ hmono ha.1 hy (ha.2 hy)⟩
have habove : BddAbove (f '' s) := ⟨f b, fun x ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ => hyx ▸ hmono hy hb.1 (hb.2 hy)⟩
have : IsBounded (f '' s) := Metric.isBounded_of_bddAbove_of_bddBelow habove hbelow
rcases isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le.mp this with ⟨C, hC⟩
have A : MemLp (fun _ => C) ⊤ (μ.restrict s) := memLp_top_const _
apply MemLp.mono A (aemeasurable_restrict_of_monotoneOn h's hmono).aestronglyMeasurable
apply (ae_restrict_iff' h's).mpr
apply ae_of_all _ fun y hy ↦ ?_
exact (hC _ (mem_image_of_mem f hy)).trans (le_abs_self _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias MonotoneOn.memℒp_top := MonotoneOn.memLp_top
theorem MonotoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (hmono : MonotoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
(hmono.memLp_top ha hb h's).mono_exponent_of_measure_support_ne_top (s := univ)
(by simp) (by simpa using hs) le_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias MonotoneOn.memℒp_of_measure_ne_top := MonotoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top
theorem MonotoneOn.memLp_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hmono : MonotoneOn f s) : MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) := by
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
· exact hmono.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (hs.isLeast_sInf h) (hs.isGreatest_sSup h)
hs.measure_lt_top.ne hs.measurableSet
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias MonotoneOn.memℒp_isCompact := MonotoneOn.memLp_isCompact
theorem AntitoneOn.memLp_top (hanti : AntitoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f ∞ (μ.restrict s) :=
MonotoneOn.memLp_top (E := Eᵒᵈ) hanti ha hb h's
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias AntitoneOn.memℒp_top := AntitoneOn.memLp_top
theorem AntitoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (hanti : AntitoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
MonotoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (E := Eᵒᵈ) hanti ha hb hs h's
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias AntitoneOn.memℒp_of_measure_ne_top := AntitoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top
theorem AntitoneOn.memLp_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hanti : AntitoneOn f s) : MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
MonotoneOn.memLp_isCompact (E := Eᵒᵈ) hs hanti
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias AntitoneOn.memℒp_isCompact := AntitoneOn.memLp_isCompact
theorem MonotoneOn.integrableOn_of_measure_ne_top (hmono : MonotoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hmono.memLp_of_measure_ne_top ha hb hs h's)
theorem MonotoneOn.integrableOn_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hmono : MonotoneOn f s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hmono.memLp_isCompact hs)
theorem AntitoneOn.integrableOn_of_measure_ne_top (hanti : AntitoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hanti.memLp_of_measure_ne_top ha hb hs h's)
theorem AntitoneOn.integrableOn_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hanti : AntitoneOn f s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hanti.memLp_isCompact hs)
theorem Monotone.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (hmono : Monotone f) :
LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, xab, hab, abU⟩ : ∃ a b : X, x ∈ Icc a b ∧ Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ Icc a b ⊆ U :=
exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhds hU
have ab : a ≤ b := xab.1.trans xab.2
refine ⟨Icc a b, hab, ?_⟩
exact
(hmono.monotoneOn _).integrableOn_of_measure_ne_top (isLeast_Icc ab) (isGreatest_Icc ab)
((measure_mono abU).trans_lt h'U).ne measurableSet_Icc
theorem Antitone.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (hanti : Antitone f) :
LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
hanti.dual_right.locallyIntegrable
end Monotone
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace X] {A K : Set X}
section Mul
variable [NormedRing R] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X R] {g g' : X → R}
theorem IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn_of_subset (hg : IntegrableOn g A μ) (hg' : ContinuousOn g' K)
(hA : MeasurableSet A) (hK : IsCompact K) (hAK : A ⊆ K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) A μ := by
rcases IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn hK hg' with ⟨C, hC⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hg ⊢
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict A, ‖g x * g' x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem hA] with x hx
refine (norm_mul_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [mul_comm]
gcongr
exact hC x (hAK hx)
exact
MemLp.of_le_mul hg (hg.aestronglyMeasurable.mul <| (hg'.mono hAK).aestronglyMeasurable hA) this
theorem IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn [T2Space X] (hg : IntegrableOn g K μ)
(hg' : ContinuousOn g' K) (hK : IsCompact K) : IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) K μ :=
hg.mul_continuousOn_of_subset hg' hK.measurableSet hK (Subset.refl _)
theorem IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul_of_subset (hg : ContinuousOn g K) (hg' : IntegrableOn g' A μ)
(hK : IsCompact K) (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hAK : A ⊆ K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) A μ := by
rcases IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn hK hg with ⟨C, hC⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hg' ⊢
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict A, ‖g x * g' x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖ := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem hA] with x hx
refine (norm_mul_le _ _).trans ?_
gcongr
exact hC x (hAK hx)
exact
MemLp.of_le_mul hg' (((hg.mono hAK).aestronglyMeasurable hA).mul hg'.aestronglyMeasurable) this
theorem IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul [T2Space X] (hg : ContinuousOn g K)
(hg' : IntegrableOn g' K μ) (hK : IsCompact K) : IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) K μ :=
hg'.continuousOn_mul_of_subset hg hK hK.measurableSet Subset.rfl
end Mul
section SMul
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
theorem IntegrableOn.continuousOn_smul [T2Space X] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X 𝕜] {g : X → E}
(hg : IntegrableOn g K μ) {f : X → 𝕜} (hf : ContinuousOn f K) (hK : IsCompact K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => f x • g x) K μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, ← integrable_norm_iff]
· simp_rw [norm_smul]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul ?_ hg.norm hK
exact continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf
· exact (hf.aestronglyMeasurable hK.measurableSet).smul hg.1
theorem IntegrableOn.smul_continuousOn [T2Space X] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X E] {f : X → 𝕜}
(hf : IntegrableOn f K μ) {g : X → E} (hg : ContinuousOn g K) (hK : IsCompact K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => f x • g x) K μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, ← integrable_norm_iff]
· simp_rw [norm_smul]
refine IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn hf.norm ?_ hK
exact continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hg
· exact hf.1.smul (hg.aestronglyMeasurable hK.measurableSet)
end SMul
namespace LocallyIntegrableOn
theorem continuousOn_mul [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] [NormedRing R]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X R] {f g : X → R} {s : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => g x * f x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).continuousOn_mul (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
theorem mul_continuousOn [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] [NormedRing R]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X R] {f g : X → R} {s : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => f x * g x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).mul_continuousOn (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
theorem continuousOn_smul [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : X → E} {g : X → 𝕜} {s : Set X}
(hs : IsLocallyClosed s) (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => g x • f x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).continuousOn_smul (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
|
theorem smul_continuousOn [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : X → 𝕜} {g : X → E} {s : Set X}
(hs : IsLocallyClosed s) (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => f x • g x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 680 | 685 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ` -/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit` -/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")]
alias nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse := nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A * A⁻¹ = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A⁻¹ * A = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A * A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A * A⁻¹ = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A⁻¹ * A = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹ * B = C ↔ B = A * C :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible]⟩
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
B * A⁻¹ = C ↔ B = C * A :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]⟩
lemma inv_mulVec_eq_vec {A : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A]
{u v : n → α} (hM : u = A.mulVec v) : A⁻¹.mulVec u = v := by
rw [hM, Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, Matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible, Matrix.one_mulVec]
lemma mul_right_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix n m α) => A * x) :=
fun _ _ h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible] using congr_arg (A⁻¹ * ·) h
lemma mul_left_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix m n α) => x * A) :=
fun a x hax => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible] using congr_arg (· * A⁻¹) hax
lemma mul_right_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix n m α} : A * x = A * y ↔ x = y :=
(mul_right_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
lemma mul_left_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix m n α} : x * A = y * A ↔ x = y :=
(mul_left_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
end Inv
section InjectiveMul
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommRing α]
lemma mul_left_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix l m α => x * A) := fun _ _ g => by
simpa only [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_one, h] using congr_arg (· * B) g
lemma mul_right_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix m l α => B * x) :=
fun _ _ g => by simpa only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.one_mul, h] using congr_arg (A * ·) g
end InjectiveMul
section vecMul
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse
[DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Finite n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, B * A = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨y ᵥ* B, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose rows hrows using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨Matrix.of rows, Matrix.ext fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [mul_apply_eq_vecMul, one_eq_pi_single, ← hrows]
rfl
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse
[DecidableEq m] [Finite m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, A * B = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨B *ᵥ y, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose cols hcols using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨(Matrix.of cols)ᵀ, Matrix.ext fun i j ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm, ← hcols j]
rfl
end Semiring
variable [DecidableEq m] {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Fintype m]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse, exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse, exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit]
exact LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (f := A.vecMulLinear) h
change Function.Injective A.vecMulLinear
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
intro c hc
replace h := h.invertible
simpa using congr_arg A⁻¹.vecMulLinear hc
theorem mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← isUnit_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit]
simp_rw [vecMul_transpose]
theorem linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.row ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← col_transpose, ← mulVec_injective_iff, ← coe_mulVecLin, mulVecLin_transpose,
← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit, coe_vecMulLinear]
theorem linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.col ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← row_transpose, linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit, isUnit_transpose]
theorem vecMul_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem vecMul_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.row :=
linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.col :=
linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
end vecMul
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero : A⁻¹ * A = 1 ∧ A * A⁻¹ = 1 ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· exact Or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩
· exact Or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h)
theorem det_nonsing_inv_mul_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 := by
rw [← det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
@[simp]
theorem det_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹.det = Ring.inverse A.det := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, det_invOf]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· rw [det_isEmpty, det_isEmpty, Ring.inverse_one]
· rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h, det_zero ‹_›]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit A⁻¹.det :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det h)
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A :=
calc
A⁻¹⁻¹ = 1 * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [Matrix.one_mul]
_ = A * A⁻¹ * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [A.mul_nonsing_inv h]
_ = A := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, A⁻¹.mul_nonsing_inv (A.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det h), Matrix.mul_one]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹.det ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_nonsing_inv, isUnit_ringInverse]
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹ ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_isUnit_det, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
-- `IsUnit.invertible` lifts the proposition `IsUnit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`.
/-- A version of `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is
therefore noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def invertibleOfIsUnitDet (h : IsUnit A.det) : Invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
/-- A version of `Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is therefore
noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def nonsingInvUnit (h : IsUnit A.det) : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ _ (invertibleOfIsUnitDet A h)
theorem unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit [Invertible A.det] :
unitOfDetInvertible A = nonsingInvUnit A (isUnit_of_invertible _) := by
ext
rfl
variable {A} {B}
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
letI := invertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
invOf_eq_nonsing_inv A ▸ invOf_eq_left_inv h
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
inv_eq_left_inv (mul_eq_one_comm.2 h)
section InvEqInv
variable {C : Matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem left_inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_left_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : A * C = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_right_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_left_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
theorem inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : IsUnit A.det) : A = B := by
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') ?_
rw [h]
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ ?_
rwa [← isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ← h, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
end InvEqInv
variable (A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with ht | ht
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rcases (Fintype.card n).zero_le.eq_or_lt with hc | hc
· rw [eq_comm, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hc
haveI := hc
ext i
exact (IsEmpty.false i).elim
· have hn : Nonempty n := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp hc
refine nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ ?_
simp [hn]
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.one, Matrix.inv with inv_one := inv_eq_left_inv (by simp) }
theorem inv_smul (k : α) [Invertible k] (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = ⅟ k • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_smul' (k : αˣ) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = k⁻¹ • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (adjugate A)⁻¹ = h.unit⁻¹ • A := by
refine inv_eq_left_inv ?_
rw [smul_mul, mul_adjugate, Units.smul_def, smul_smul, h.val_inv_mul, one_smul]
section Diagonal
/-- `diagonal v` is invertible if `v` is -/
def diagonalInvertible {α} [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] :
Invertible (diagonal v) :=
Invertible.map (diagonalRingHom n α) v
theorem invOf_diagonal_eq {α} [Semiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] [Invertible (diagonal v)] :
⅟ (diagonal v) = diagonal (⅟ v) := by
rw [@Invertible.congr _ _ _ _ _ (diagonalInvertible v) rfl]
rfl
/-- `v` is invertible if `diagonal v` is -/
def invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible (v : n → α) [Invertible (diagonal v)] : Invertible v where
invOf := diag (⅟ (diagonal v))
invOf_mul_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_assoc, prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
mul_invOf_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_prod_erase _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
/-- Together `Matrix.diagonalInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible (v : n → α) : Invertible (diagonal v) ≃ Invertible v where
toFun := @invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
invFun := @diagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_diagonal {v : n → α} : IsUnit (diagonal v) ↔ IsUnit v := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible v).nonempty_congr]
theorem inv_diagonal (v : n → α) : (diagonal v)⁻¹ = diagonal (Ring.inverse v) := by
rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse]
by_cases h : IsUnit v
· have := isUnit_diagonal.mpr h
cases this.nonempty_invertible
cases h.nonempty_invertible
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_diagonal_eq]
· have := isUnit_diagonal.not.mpr h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Pi.zero_def, diagonal_zero, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this]
end Diagonal
/-- The inverse of a 1×1 or 0×0 matrix is always diagonal.
While we could write this as `of fun _ _ => Ring.inverse (A default default)` on the RHS, this is
less useful because:
* It wouldn't work for 0×0 matrices.
* More things are true about diagonal matrices than constant matrices, and so more lemmas exist.
`Matrix.diagonal_unique` can be used to reach this form, while `Ring.inverse_eq_inv` can be used
to replace `Ring.inverse` with `⁻¹`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem inv_subsingleton [Subsingleton m] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix m m α) :
A⁻¹ = diagonal fun i => Ring.inverse (A i i) := by
rw [inv_def, adjugate_subsingleton, smul_one_eq_diagonal]
congr! with i
exact det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
section Woodbury
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (U : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix m m α) (V : Matrix m n α)
/-- The **Woodbury Identity** (`⁻¹` version). -/
theorem add_mul_mul_inv_eq_sub (hA : IsUnit A) (hC : IsUnit C) (hAC : IsUnit (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)) :
(A + U * C * V)⁻¹ = A⁻¹ - A⁻¹ * U * (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)⁻¹ * V * A⁻¹ := by
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hA.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hC.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨iAC⟩ := hAC.nonempty_invertible
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv] at iAC
letI := invertibleAddMulMul A U C V
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
apply invOf_add_mul_mul
end Woodbury
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_inv (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹⁻¹⁻¹ = A⁻¹ := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· rw [nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv _ h]
· simp [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_add_inv'` -/
theorem inv_add_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ + B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (A + B) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse] using Ring.inverse_add_inverse h
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_sub_inv'` -/
theorem inv_sub_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ - B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (B - A) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse] using Ring.inverse_sub_inverse h
theorem mul_inv_rev (A B : Matrix n n α) : (A * B)⁻¹ = B⁻¹ * A⁻¹ := by
simp only [inv_def]
rw [Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.mul_smul, smul_smul, det_mul, adjugate_mul_distrib,
Ring.mul_inverse_rev]
/-- A version of `List.prod_inv_reverse` for `Matrix.inv`. -/
theorem list_prod_inv_reverse : ∀ l : List (Matrix n n α), l.prod⁻¹ = (l.reverse.map Inv.inv).prod
| [] => by rw [List.reverse_nil, List.map_nil, List.prod_nil, inv_one]
| A::Xs => by
rw [List.reverse_cons', List.map_concat, List.prod_concat, List.prod_cons,
mul_inv_rev, list_prod_inv_reverse Xs]
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • A⁻¹ *ᵥ b = cramer A b := by
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec, A.nonsing_inv_apply h, ← smul_mulVec_assoc, smul_smul,
h.mul_val_inv, one_smul]
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_vecMul_eq_cramer_transpose (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • b ᵥ* A⁻¹ = cramer Aᵀ b := by
rw [← A⁻¹.transpose_transpose, vecMul_transpose, transpose_nonsing_inv, ← det_transpose,
Aᵀ.det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer _ (isUnit_det_transpose A h)]
/-! ### Inverses of permutated matrices
Note that the simp-normal form of `Matrix.reindex` is `Matrix.submatrix`, so we prove most of these
results about only the latter.
| -/
section Submatrix
variable [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is invertible if `A` is -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 652 | 660 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Integral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
/-!
# Minimal polynomials on an algebra over a field
This file specializes the theory of minpoly to the setting of field extensions
and derives some well-known properties, amongst which the fact that minimal polynomials
are irreducible, and uniquely determined by their defining property.
-/
open Polynomial Set Function minpoly
namespace minpoly
variable {A B : Type*}
variable (A) [Field A]
section Ring
variable [Ring B] [Algebra A B] (x : B)
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a nonzero polynomial `p`, then the degree of `p` is at least the
degree of the minimal polynomial of `x`. See also `minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed.degree_le_of_ne_zero`
which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem degree_le_of_ne_zero {p : A[X]} (pnz : p ≠ 0) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p :=
calc
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) :=
min A x (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv pnz) (by simp [hp])
_ = degree p := degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv p pnz
theorem ne_zero_of_finite (e : B) [FiniteDimensional A B] : minpoly A e ≠ 0 :=
minpoly.ne_zero <| .of_finite A _
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` is uniquely characterized by its defining property:
if there is another monic polynomial of minimal degree that has `x` as a root, then this polynomial
is equal to the minimal polynomial of `x`. See also `minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed.Minpoly.unique`
which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem unique {p : A[X]} (pmonic : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0)
(pmin : ∀ q : A[X], q.Monic → Polynomial.aeval x q = 0 → degree p ≤ degree q) :
p = minpoly A x := by
have hx : IsIntegral A x := ⟨p, pmonic, hp⟩
symm; apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
by_contra hnz
apply degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz (by simp [hp]) |>.not_lt
apply degree_sub_lt _ (minpoly.ne_zero hx)
· rw [(monic hx).leadingCoeff, pmonic.leadingCoeff]
· exact le_antisymm (min A x pmonic hp) (pmin (minpoly A x) (monic hx) (aeval A x))
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a polynomial `p`, then the minimal polynomial of `x` divides `p`.
See also `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd` which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for
stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem dvd {p : A[X]} (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) : minpoly A x ∣ p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp only [hp0, dvd_zero]
have hx : IsIntegral A x := IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨p, hp0, hp⟩
| rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (monic hx)]
by_contra hnz
apply degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz
((aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root (monic hx) (aeval _ _)).trans hp) |>.not_lt
exact degree_modByMonic_lt _ (monic hx)
variable {A x} in
lemma dvd_iff {p : A[X]} : minpoly A x ∣ p ↔ Polynomial.aeval x p = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ ↦ by rw [hq, map_mul, aeval, zero_mul], minpoly.dvd A x⟩
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/Field.lean | 68 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann, Kyle Miller, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Fibonacci Numbers
This file defines the fibonacci series, proves results about it and introduces
methods to compute it quickly.
-/
/-!
# The Fibonacci Sequence
## Summary
Definition of the Fibonacci sequence `F₀ = 0, F₁ = 1, Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁`.
## Main Definitions
- `Nat.fib` returns the stream of Fibonacci numbers.
## Main Statements
- `Nat.fib_add_two`: shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.`.
- `Nat.fib_gcd`: `fib n` is a strong divisibility sequence.
- `Nat.fib_succ_eq_sum_choose`: `fib` is given by the sum of `Nat.choose` along an antidiagonal.
- `Nat.fib_succ_eq_succ_sum`: shows that `F₀ + F₁ + ⋯ + Fₙ = Fₙ₊₂ - 1`.
- `Nat.fib_two_mul` and `Nat.fib_two_mul_add_one` are the basis for an efficient algorithm to
compute `fib` (see `Nat.fastFib`).
## Implementation Notes
For efficiency purposes, the sequence is defined using `Stream.iterate`.
## Tags
fib, fibonacci
-/
namespace Nat
/-- Implementation of the fibonacci sequence satisfying
`fib 0 = 0, fib 1 = 1, fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1)`.
*Note:* We use a stream iterator for better performance when compared to the naive recursive
implementation.
-/
@[pp_nodot]
def fib (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.snd, p.fst + p.snd))^[n] (0, 1)).fst
@[simp]
theorem fib_zero : fib 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fib_one : fib 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fib_two : fib 2 = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Shows that `fib` indeed satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence `Fₙ₊₂ = Fₙ + Fₙ₊₁.` -/
theorem fib_add_two {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1) := by
simp [fib, Function.iterate_succ_apply']
lemma fib_add_one : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → fib (n + 1) = fib (n - 1) + fib n
| _n + 1, _ => fib_add_two
theorem fib_le_fib_succ {n : ℕ} : fib n ≤ fib (n + 1) := by cases n <;> simp [fib_add_two]
|
@[mono]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Fib/Basic.lean | 86 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Scan
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Additional theorems and definitions about the `Vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `Vector.cons`.
-/
universe u
variable {α β γ σ φ : Type*} {m n : ℕ}
namespace List.Vector
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
/-- Two `v w : Vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
/-- The empty `Vector` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ (cons a v).toList, p x) :
(cons a v).pmap f hp = cons (f a (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.1))
(v.pmap f (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.2)) := rfl
/-- Opposite direction of `Vector.pmap_cons` -/
theorem pmap_cons' {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(ha : p a) (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
cons (f a ha) (v.pmap f hp) = (cons a v).pmap f (by simpa [ha]) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.map f)[i] = f v[i] := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_map, List.getElem_map]
@[simp]
theorem toList_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).toList = v.toList.pmap f hp := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).head = f v.head (hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, head_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inl rfl) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).tail = v.tail.pmap f (fun x hx ↦ hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inr hx) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.pmap f hp)[i] = f v[i] (hp _ (by simp [getElem_def, List.getElem_mem])) := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_pmap, List.getElem_pmap]
theorem get_eq_get_toList (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias get_eq_get := get_eq_get_toList
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.getElem_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get_toList]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_cons (hd₁ : α) (tl₁ : Vector α n) (hd₂ : β) (tl₂ : Vector β n) (f : α → β → γ) :
Vector.map₂ f (hd₁ ::ᵥ tl₁) (hd₂ ::ᵥ tl₂) = f hd₁ hd₂ ::ᵥ (Vector.map₂ f tl₁ tl₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f i := by
conv_rhs => erw [← List.get_ofFn f ⟨i, by simp⟩]
simp only [get_eq_get_toList]
congr <;> simp [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_get (v : Vector α n) : ofFn (get v) = v := by
rcases v with ⟨l, rfl⟩
apply toList_injective
dsimp
| simpa only [toList_ofFn] using List.ofFn_get _
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 172 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
/-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
variable [CharZero K]
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338
We name `hcycl` so it can be used as a named argument,
but since https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338, this is considered unused,
| so we need to disable the linter. -/
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 213 | 219 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.CompactConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equiv
/-!
# Ascoli Theorem
In this file, we prove the general **Arzela-Ascoli theorem**, and various related statements about
the topology of equicontinuous subsetes of `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α`, where `X` is a topological space, `𝔖` is
a family of compact subsets of `X`, and `α` is a uniform space.
## Main statements
* If `X` is a compact space, then the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence coincide on equicontinuous subsets. This is the key fact that makes equicontinuity
important in functional analysis. We state various versions of it:
- as an equality of `UniformSpace`s: `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`
- in terms of `IsUniformInducing`: `Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi`
- in terms of `IsInducing`: `Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi`
- in terms of convergence along a filter: `Equicontinuous.tendsto_uniformFun_iff_pi`
* As a consequence, if `𝔖` is a family of compact subsets of `X`, then the uniform structures of
uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence on `⋃₀ 𝔖` coincide on equicontinuous
subsets. Again, we prove multiple variations:
- as an equality of `UniformSpace`s: `EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq`
- in terms of `IsUniformInducing`: `EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
- in terms of `IsInducing`: `EquicontinuousOn.inducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
- in terms of convergence along a filter: `EquicontinuousOn.tendsto_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
* The **Arzela-Ascoli theorem** follows from the previous fact and Tykhonov's theorem.
All of its variations can be found under the `ArzelaAscoli` namespace.
## Implementation details
* The statements in this file may be a bit daunting because we prove everything for families and
embeddings instead of subspaces with the subspace topology. This is done because, in practice,
one would rarely work with `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` directly, so we need to provide API for bringing back the
statements to various other types, such as `C(X, Y)` or `E →L[𝕜] F`. To counteract this, all
statements (as well as most proofs!) are documented quite thoroughly.
* A lot of statements assume `∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K` instead of the more natural
`EquicontinuousOn F (⋃₀ 𝔖)`. This is in order to keep the most generality, as the first statement
is strictly weaker.
* In Bourbaki, the usual Arzela-Ascoli compactness theorem follows from a similar total boundedness
result. Here we go directly for the compactness result, which is the most useful in practice, but
this will be an easy addition/refactor if we ever need it.
## TODO
* Prove that, on an equicontinuous family, pointwise convergence and pointwise convergence on a
dense subset coincide, and deduce metrizability criterions for equicontinuous subsets.
* Prove the total boundedness version of the theorem
* Prove the converse statement: if a subset of `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` is compact, then it is equicontinuous
on each `K ∈ 𝔖`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
open Set Filter Uniformity Topology Function UniformConvergence
variable {ι X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [UniformSpace α] {F : ι → X → α}
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence induce the same uniform structure on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
Consider using `Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi` and
`Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi` instead, to avoid rewriting instances. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq [CompactSpace X] (F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
(UniformFun.uniformSpace X α).comap F =
(Pi.uniformSpace _).comap F := by
-- The `≤` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm (UniformSpace.comap_mono UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun) ?_
-- A bit of rewriting to get a nice intermediate statement.
simp_rw [UniformSpace.comap, UniformSpace.le_def, uniformity_comap, Pi.uniformity,
Filter.comap_iInf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
refine ((UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity X α).comap (Prod.map F F)).ge_iff.mpr ?_
-- Core of the proof: we need to show that, for any entourage `U` in `α`,
-- the set `𝐓(U) := {(i,j) : ι × ι | ∀ x : X, (F i x, F j x) ∈ U}` belongs to the filter
-- `⨅ x, comap ((i,j) ↦ (F i x, F j x)) (𝓤 α)`.
-- In other words, we have to show that it contains a finite intersection of
-- sets of the form `𝐒(V, x) := {(i,j) : ι × ι | (F i x, F j x) ∈ V}` for some
-- `x : X` and `V ∈ 𝓤 α`.
intro U hU
-- We will do an `ε/3` argument, so we start by choosing a symmetric entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 α`
-- such that `V ○ V ○ V ⊆ U`.
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, Vsymm, hVU⟩
-- Set `Ω x := {y | ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ V}`. The equicontinuity of `F` guarantees that
-- each `Ω x` is a neighborhood of `x`.
let Ω x : Set X := {y | ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ V}
-- Hence, by compactness of `X`, we can find some `A ⊆ X` finite such that the `Ω a`s for `a ∈ A`
-- still cover `X`.
rcases CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover Ω (fun x ↦ F_eqcont x V hV) with ⟨A, Acover⟩
-- We now claim that `⋂ a ∈ A, 𝐒(V, a) ⊆ 𝐓(U)`.
have : (⋂ a ∈ A, {ij : ι × ι | (F ij.1 a, F ij.2 a) ∈ V}) ⊆
(Prod.map F F) ⁻¹' UniformFun.gen X α U := by
-- Given `(i, j) ∈ ⋂ a ∈ A, 𝐒(V, a)` and `x : X`, we have to prove that `(F i x, F j x) ∈ U`.
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij x
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hij
-- We know that `x ∈ Ω a` for some `a ∈ A`, so that both `(F i x, F i a)` and `(F j a, F j x)`
-- are in `V`.
rcases mem_iUnion₂.mp (Acover.symm.subset <| mem_univ x) with ⟨a, ha, hax⟩
-- Since `(i, j) ∈ 𝐒(V, a)` we also have `(F i a, F j a) ∈ V`, and finally we get
-- `(F i x, F j x) ∈ V ○ V ○ V ⊆ U`.
exact hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel (prodMk_mem_compRel
(Vsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hax i)) (hij a ha)) (hax j))
-- This completes the proof.
exact mem_of_superset
(A.iInter_mem_sets.mpr fun x _ ↦ mem_iInf_of_mem x <| preimage_mem_comap hV) this
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence induce the same uniform structure on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a version of `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq` stated in terms of `IsUniformInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi [UniformSpace ι] [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
IsUniformInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ↔ IsUniformInducing F := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace, isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace,
← F_eqcont.comap_uniformFun_eq]
rfl
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
| equicontinuous family. Then, the topologies of uniform convergence and pointwise convergence induce
the same topology on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a consequence of `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`, stated in terms of `IsInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi [TopologicalSpace ι] [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
IsInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ↔ IsInducing F := by
rw [isInducing_iff, isInducing_iff]
change (_ = (UniformFun.uniformSpace X α |>.comap F |>.toTopologicalSpace)) ↔
(_ = (Pi.uniformSpace _ |>.comap F |>.toTopologicalSpace))
rw [F_eqcont.comap_uniformFun_eq]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Ascoli.lean | 143 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
/-!
# Infimum separation
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `Set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `Set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `Set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
|
theorem einfsep_lt_iff {d} :
s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < d := by
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 69 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Rotate
/-!
# The rank nullity theorem
In this file we provide the rank nullity theorem as a typeclass, and prove various corollaries
of the theorem. The main definition is `HasRankNullity.{u} R`, which states that
1. Every `R`-module `M : Type u` has a linear independent subset of cardinality `Module.rank R M`.
2. `rank (M ⧸ N) + rank N = rank M` for every `R`-module `M : Type u` and every `N : Submodule R M`.
The following instances are provided in mathlib:
1. `DivisionRing.hasRankNullity` for division rings in `LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean`.
2. `IsDomain.hasRankNullity` for commutative domains in `LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Localization.lean`.
TODO: prove the rank-nullity theorem for `[Ring R] [IsDomain R] [StrongRankCondition R]`.
See `nonempty_oreSet_of_strongRankCondition` for a start.
-/
universe u v
open Function Set Cardinal Submodule LinearMap
variable {R} {M M₁ M₂ M₃ : Type u} {M' : Type v} [Ring R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃] [AddCommGroup M']
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M']
/--
`HasRankNullity.{u}` is a class of rings satisfying
1. Every `R`-module `M : Type u` has a linear independent subset of cardinality `Module.rank R M`.
2. `rank (M ⧸ N) + rank N = rank M` for every `R`-module `M : Type u` and every `N : Submodule R M`.
Usually such a ring satisfies `HasRankNullity.{w}` for all universes `w`, and the universe
argument is there because of technical limitations to universe polymorphism.
See `DivisionRing.hasRankNullity` and `IsDomain.hasRankNullity`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasRankNullity (R : Type v) [inst : Ring R] : Prop where
exists_set_linearIndependent : ∀ (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M],
∃ s : Set M, #s = Module.rank R M ∧ LinearIndepOn R id s
rank_quotient_add_rank : ∀ {M : Type u} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (N : Submodule R M),
Module.rank R (M ⧸ N) + Module.rank R N = Module.rank R M
variable [HasRankNullity.{u} R]
lemma Submodule.rank_quotient_add_rank (N : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ N) + Module.rank R N = Module.rank R M :=
HasRankNullity.rank_quotient_add_rank N
variable (R M) in
lemma exists_set_linearIndependent :
∃ s : Set M, #s = Module.rank R M ∧ LinearIndependent (ι := s) R Subtype.val :=
HasRankNullity.exists_set_linearIndependent M
variable (R) in
theorem nontrivial_of_hasRankNullity : Nontrivial R := by
refine (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun H ↦ ?_
have := rank_quotient_add_rank (R := R) (M := PUnit) ⊥
simp [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_hasRankNullity
theorem LinearMap.lift_rank_range_add_rank_ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
lift.{u} (Module.rank R (LinearMap.range f)) + lift.{v} (Module.rank R (LinearMap.ker f)) =
lift.{v} (Module.rank R M) := by
haveI := fun p : Submodule R M => Classical.decEq (M ⧸ p)
rw [← f.quotKerEquivRange.lift_rank_eq, ← lift_add, rank_quotient_add_rank]
/-- The **rank-nullity theorem** -/
theorem LinearMap.rank_range_add_rank_ker (f : M →ₗ[R] M₁) :
Module.rank R (LinearMap.range f) + Module.rank R (LinearMap.ker f) = Module.rank R M := by
haveI := fun p : Submodule R M => Classical.decEq (M ⧸ p)
| rw [← f.quotKerEquivRange.rank_eq, rank_quotient_add_rank]
theorem LinearMap.lift_rank_eq_of_surjective {f : M →ₗ[R] M'} (h : Surjective f) :
lift.{v} (Module.rank R M) =
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/RankNullity.lean | 81 | 84 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
| theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 309 | 309 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Cover.Open
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.GammaSpecAdjunction
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.InvSubmonoid
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHom.Surjective
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.CommRingCat
/-!
# Affine schemes
We define the category of `AffineScheme`s as the essential image of `Spec`.
We also define predicates about affine schemes and affine open sets.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme`: The category of affine schemes.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffine`: A scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an
isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.isoSpec`: The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine
scheme.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme.equivCommRingCat`: The equivalence of categories
`AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ` given by `AffineScheme.Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme` and
`AffineScheme.Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRingCat`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen`: An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is
affine.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.fromSpec`: The immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Spec (structureSheaf)
/-- The category of affine schemes -/
def AffineScheme :=
Scheme.Spec.EssImageSubcategory
deriving Category
/-- A Scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an isomorphism. -/
class IsAffine (X : Scheme) : Prop where
affine : IsIso X.toSpecΓ
attribute [instance] IsAffine.affine
instance (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] : IsIso (ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X) := @IsAffine.affine X _
/-- The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine scheme. -/
@[simps! -isSimp hom]
def Scheme.isoSpec (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : X ≅ Spec Γ(X, ⊤) :=
asIso X.toSpecΓ
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_hom_naturality {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
X.isoSpec.hom ≫ Spec.map (f.appTop) = f ≫ Y.isoSpec.hom := by
simp only [isoSpec, asIso_hom, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality]
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Spec.map (f.appTop) ≫ Y.isoSpec.inv = X.isoSpec.inv ≫ f := by
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, isoSpec, asIso_hom, ← Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality_assoc, isoSpec,
asIso_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] :
X.toSpecΓ ≫ X.isoSpec.inv = 𝟙 _ :=
X.isoSpec.hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.isoSpec_inv_toSpecΓ (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] :
X.isoSpec.inv ≫ X.toSpecΓ = 𝟙 _ :=
X.isoSpec.inv_hom_id
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme and the information that it is affine.
Also see `AffineScheme.of` for a typeclass version. -/
@[simps]
def AffineScheme.mk (X : Scheme) (_ : IsAffine X) : AffineScheme :=
⟨X, ΓSpec.adjunction.mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso _⟩
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme. Also see `AffineScheme.mk` for a non-typeclass
version. -/
def AffineScheme.of (X : Scheme) [h : IsAffine X] : AffineScheme :=
AffineScheme.mk X h
/-- Type check a morphism of schemes as a morphism in `AffineScheme`. -/
def AffineScheme.ofHom {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
AffineScheme.of X ⟶ AffineScheme.of Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem essImage_Spec {X : Scheme} : Scheme.Spec.essImage X ↔ IsAffine X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Functor.essImage.unit_isIso h⟩,
fun _ => ΓSpec.adjunction.mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")] alias mem_Spec_essImage := essImage_Spec
instance isAffine_affineScheme (X : AffineScheme.{u}) : IsAffine X.obj :=
⟨Functor.essImage.unit_isIso X.property⟩
instance (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) : IsAffine (Scheme.Spec.obj R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.isAffine_affineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_essImage R⟩
instance isAffine_Spec (R : CommRingCat) : IsAffine (Spec R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.isAffine_affineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_essImage (op R)⟩
theorem IsAffine.of_isIso {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] [h : IsAffine Y] : IsAffine X := by
rw [← essImage_Spec] at h ⊢; exact Functor.essImage.ofIso (asIso f).symm h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-31")] alias isAffine_of_isIso := IsAffine.of_isIso
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Y` is a morphism between affine schemes, the corresponding arrow is isomorphic
to the arrow of the morphism on prime spectra induced by the map on global sections. -/
noncomputable
def arrowIsoSpecΓOfIsAffine {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk (Spec.map f.appTop) :=
Arrow.isoMk X.isoSpec Y.isoSpec (ΓSpec.adjunction.unit_naturality _)
/-- If `f : A ⟶ B` is a ring homomorphism, the corresponding arrow is isomorphic
to the arrow of the morphism induced on global sections by the map on prime spectra. -/
def arrowIsoΓSpecOfIsAffine {A B : CommRingCat} (f : A ⟶ B) :
Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk ((Spec.map f).appTop) :=
Arrow.isoMk (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).symm (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).symm
(Scheme.ΓSpecIso_inv_naturality f).symm
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec = Scheme.Spec.mapIso (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).op :=
Iso.ext (SpecMap_ΓSpecIso_hom R).symm
@[simp] theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec_hom (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec.hom = Spec.map (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).hom :=
(SpecMap_ΓSpecIso_hom R).symm
@[simp] theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec_inv (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec.inv = Spec.map (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).inv :=
congr($(isoSpec_Spec R).inv)
lemma ext_of_isAffine {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] {f g : X ⟶ Y} (e : f.appTop = g.appTop) :
f = g := by
rw [← cancel_mono Y.toSpecΓ, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality, e]
namespace AffineScheme
/-- The `Spec` functor into the category of affine schemes. -/
def Spec : CommRingCatᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme :=
Scheme.Spec.toEssImage
/-! We copy over instances from `Scheme.Spec.toEssImage`. -/
instance Spec_full : Spec.Full := Functor.Full.toEssImage _
instance Spec_faithful : Spec.Faithful := Functor.Faithful.toEssImage _
instance Spec_essSurj : Spec.EssSurj := Functor.EssSurj.toEssImage (F := _)
/-- The forgetful functor `AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme`. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetToScheme : AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme :=
Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι
/-! We copy over instances from `Scheme.Spec.essImageInclusion`. -/
instance forgetToScheme_full : forgetToScheme.Full :=
inferInstanceAs Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι.Full
instance forgetToScheme_faithful : forgetToScheme.Faithful :=
inferInstanceAs Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι.Faithful
/-- The global section functor of an affine scheme. -/
def Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRingCat :=
forgetToScheme.op ⋙ Scheme.Γ
/-- The category of affine schemes is equivalent to the category of commutative rings. -/
def equivCommRingCat : AffineScheme ≌ CommRingCatᵒᵖ :=
equivEssImageOfReflective.symm
instance : Γ.{u}.rightOp.IsEquivalence := equivCommRingCat.isEquivalence_functor
instance : Γ.{u}.rightOp.op.IsEquivalence := equivCommRingCat.op.isEquivalence_functor
instance ΓIsEquiv : Γ.{u}.IsEquivalence :=
inferInstanceAs (Γ.{u}.rightOp.op ⋙ (opOpEquivalence _).functor).IsEquivalence
instance hasColimits : HasColimits AffineScheme.{u} :=
haveI := Adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence.{u} Γ.{u}
Adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence.{u} (opOpEquivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
instance hasLimits : HasLimits AffineScheme.{u} := by
haveI := Adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence Γ.{u}
haveI : HasLimits AffineScheme.{u}ᵒᵖᵒᵖ := Limits.hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits
exact Adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence (opOpEquivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
noncomputable instance Γ_preservesLimits : PreservesLimits Γ.{u}.rightOp := inferInstance
noncomputable instance forgetToScheme_preservesLimits : PreservesLimits forgetToScheme := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true })
@preservesLimits_of_natIso _ _ _ _ _ _
(isoWhiskerRight equivCommRingCat.unitIso forgetToScheme).symm
change PreservesLimits (equivCommRingCat.functor ⋙ Scheme.Spec)
infer_instance
end AffineScheme
/-- An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is affine. -/
def IsAffineOpen {X : Scheme} (U : X.Opens) : Prop :=
IsAffine U
/-- The set of affine opens as a subset of `opens X`. -/
def Scheme.affineOpens (X : Scheme) : Set X.Opens :=
{U : X.Opens | IsAffineOpen U}
instance {Y : Scheme.{u}} (U : Y.affineOpens) : IsAffine U :=
U.property
theorem isAffineOpen_opensRange {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : IsOpenImmersion f] : IsAffineOpen (Scheme.Hom.opensRange f) := by
refine .of_isIso (IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq f (Y.ofRestrict _) ?_).inv
exact Subtype.range_val.symm
theorem isAffineOpen_top (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : IsAffineOpen (⊤ : X.Opens) := by
convert isAffineOpen_opensRange (𝟙 X)
ext1
exact Set.range_id.symm
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineCover (X : Scheme) (i : X.affineCover.J) :
IsAffine (X.affineCover.obj i) :=
isAffine_Spec _
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineBasisCover (X : Scheme) (i : X.affineBasisCover.J) :
IsAffine (X.affineBasisCover.obj i) :=
isAffine_Spec _
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineOpenCover (X : Scheme) (𝒰 : X.AffineOpenCover) (i : 𝒰.J) :
IsAffine (𝒰.openCover.obj i) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsAffine (Spec (𝒰.obj i)))
instance {X} [IsAffine X] (i) :
IsAffine ((Scheme.coverOfIsIso (P := @IsOpenImmersion) (𝟙 X)).obj i) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
theorem isBasis_affine_open (X : Scheme) : Opens.IsBasis X.affineOpens := by
rw [Opens.isBasis_iff_nbhd]
rintro U x (hU : x ∈ (U : Set X))
obtain ⟨S, hS, hxS, hSU⟩ := X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open hU U.isOpen
refine ⟨⟨S, X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.isOpen hS⟩, ?_, hxS, hSU⟩
rcases hS with ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact isAffineOpen_opensRange _
theorem iSup_affineOpens_eq_top (X : Scheme) : ⨆ i : X.affineOpens, (i : X.Opens) = ⊤ := by
apply Opens.ext
rw [Opens.coe_iSup]
apply IsTopologicalBasis.sUnion_eq
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
exact isBasis_affine_open X
theorem Scheme.map_PrimeSpectrum_basicOpen_of_affine
(X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] (f : Γ(X, ⊤)) :
X.isoSpec.hom ⁻¹ᵁ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f = X.basicOpen f :=
Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _
theorem isBasis_basicOpen (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] :
Opens.IsBasis (Set.range (X.basicOpen : Γ(X, ⊤) → X.Opens)) := by
delta Opens.IsBasis
convert PrimeSpectrum.isBasis_basic_opens.isInducing
(TopCat.homeoOfIso (Scheme.forgetToTop.mapIso X.isoSpec)).isInducing using 1
ext
simp only [Set.mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Opens.carrier (Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _)
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Opens.carrier (Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _).symm
/-- The canonical map `U ⟶ Spec Γ(X, U)` for an open `U ⊆ X`. -/
noncomputable
def Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toScheme ⟶ Spec Γ(X, U) :=
U.toScheme.toSpecΓ ≫ Spec.map U.topIso.inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_SpecMap_map {X : Scheme} (U V : X.Opens) (h : U ≤ V) :
U.toSpecΓ ≫ Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (homOfLE h).op) = X.homOfLE h ≫ V.toSpecΓ := by
delta Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ
simp [← Spec.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, toSpecΓ_naturality_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_top {X : Scheme} :
(⊤ : X.Opens).toSpecΓ = (⊤ : X.Opens).ι ≫ X.toSpecΓ := by
simp [Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ, toSpecΓ_naturality]; rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_appTop {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toSpecΓ.appTop = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ U.topIso.inv := by
simp [Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ]
namespace IsAffineOpen
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {U : X.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (f : Γ(X, U))
attribute [-simp] eqToHom_op in
/-- The isomorphism `U ≅ Spec Γ(X, U)` for an affine `U`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp inv]
def isoSpec :
↑U ≅ Spec Γ(X, U) :=
haveI : IsAffine U := hU
U.toScheme.isoSpec ≪≫ Scheme.Spec.mapIso U.topIso.symm.op
lemma isoSpec_hom : hU.isoSpec.hom = U.toSpecΓ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv : U.toSpecΓ ≫ hU.isoSpec.inv = 𝟙 _ := hU.isoSpec.hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoSpec_inv_toSpecΓ : hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.toSpecΓ = 𝟙 _ := hU.isoSpec.inv_hom_id
open IsLocalRing in
lemma isoSpec_hom_base_apply (x : U) :
hU.isoSpec.hom.base x = (Spec.map (X.presheaf.germ U x x.2)).base (closedPoint _) := by
dsimp [IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_hom, Scheme.isoSpec_hom, Scheme.toSpecΓ_base, Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ]
rw [← Scheme.comp_base_apply, ← Spec.map_comp,
(Iso.eq_comp_inv _).mpr (Scheme.Opens.germ_stalkIso_hom U (V := ⊤) x trivial),
X.presheaf.germ_res_assoc, Spec.map_comp, Scheme.comp_base_apply]
congr 1
exact IsLocalRing.comap_closedPoint (U.stalkIso x).inv.hom
lemma isoSpec_inv_appTop :
hU.isoSpec.inv.appTop = U.topIso.hom ≫ (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv := by
simp_rw [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_obj, isoSpec_inv, Scheme.isoSpec, asIso_inv,
Scheme.comp_app, Scheme.Opens.topIso_hom, Scheme.ΓSpecIso_inv_naturality,
Scheme.inv_appTop, -- `check_compositions` reports defeq problems starting after this step.
IsIso.inv_comp_eq]
rw [Scheme.toSpecΓ_appTop]
-- We need `erw` here because the goal has
-- `Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(↑U, ⊤)).hom ≫ Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤)).inv`
-- and `Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤)` is non-reducibly defeq to `Γ(↑U, ⊤)`.
erw [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
simp only [Opens.map_top]
lemma isoSpec_hom_appTop :
hU.isoSpec.hom.appTop = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ U.topIso.inv := by
have := congr(inv $hU.isoSpec_inv_appTop)
rw [IsIso.inv_comp, IsIso.Iso.inv_inv, IsIso.Iso.inv_hom] at this
have := (Scheme.Γ.map_inv hU.isoSpec.inv.op).trans this
rwa [← op_inv, IsIso.Iso.inv_inv] at this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-16")] alias isoSpec_inv_app_top := isoSpec_inv_appTop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-16")] alias isoSpec_hom_app_top := isoSpec_hom_appTop
/-- The open immersion `Spec Γ(X, U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`. -/
def fromSpec :
Spec Γ(X, U) ⟶ X :=
haveI : IsAffine U := hU
hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.ι
instance isOpenImmersion_fromSpec :
IsOpenImmersion hU.fromSpec := by
delta fromSpec
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoSpec_inv_ι : hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.ι = hU.fromSpec := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toSpecΓ_fromSpec : U.toSpecΓ ≫ hU.fromSpec = U.ι := toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv_assoc _ _
@[simp]
theorem range_fromSpec :
Set.range hU.fromSpec.base = (U : Set X) := by
| delta IsAffineOpen.fromSpec; dsimp [IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_inv]
rw [Set.range_comp, Set.range_eq_univ.mpr, Set.image_univ]
· exact Subtype.range_coe
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/AffineScheme.lean | 383 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
| theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 225 | 227 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Bhavik Mehta, Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Defs
/-!
# Binomial coefficients
This file defines binomial coefficients and proves simple lemmas (i.e. those not
requiring more imports).
For the lemma that `n.choose k` counts the `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element set,
see `Fintype.card_powersetCard` in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset`.
## Main definition and results
* `Nat.choose`: binomial coefficients, defined inductively
* `Nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial`: a proof that `choose n k = n! / (k! * (n - k)!)`
* `Nat.choose_symm`: symmetry of binomial coefficients
* `Nat.choose_le_succ_of_lt_half_left`: `choose n k` is increasing for small values of `k`
* `Nat.choose_le_middle`: `choose n r` is maximised when `r` is `n/2`
* `Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose`: Relates binomial coefficients to the descending
factorial. This is used to prove `Nat.choose_le_pow` and variants. We provide similar statements
for the ascending factorial.
* `Nat.multichoose`: whereas `choose` counts combinations, `multichoose` counts multicombinations.
The fact that this is indeed the correct counting function for multisets is proved in
`Sym.card_sym_eq_multichoose` in `Data.Sym.Card`.
* `Nat.multichoose_eq` : a proof that `multichoose n k = (n + k - 1).choose k`.
This is central to the "stars and bars" technique in informal mathematics, where we switch between
counting multisets of size `k` over an alphabet of size `n` to counting strings of `k` elements
("stars") separated by `n-1` dividers ("bars"). See `Data.Sym.Card` for more detail.
## Tags
binomial coefficient, combination, multicombination, stars and bars
-/
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- `choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial
coefficients. For the fact that this is the number of `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element
set, see `Fintype.card_powersetCard`. -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 => choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_succ' (n k : ℕ) : choose (n + 1) (k + 1) = choose n k + choose n (k + 1) :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_left (n k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) :
choose (n + 1) k = choose n (k - 1) + choose n k := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, k = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hk
rfl
theorem choose_succ_right (n k : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
choose n (k + 1) = choose (n - 1) k + choose (n - 1) (k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, n = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hn
rfl
theorem choose_eq_choose_pred_add {n k : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (hk : 0 < k) :
choose n k = choose (n - 1) (k - 1) + choose (n - 1) k := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, k = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hk
rw [choose_succ_right _ _ hn, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
theorem choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _, 0, hk => absurd hk (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| 0, _ + 1, _ => choose_zero_succ _
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => by
have hnk : n < k := lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk
have hnk1 : n < k + 1 := lt_of_succ_lt hk
rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp]
theorem choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 := by
induction n <;> simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp]
lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n := by induction n <;> simp [*, choose, Nat.add_comm]
-- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number
theorem triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * (n + 1 - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n := by
rw [← add_mul_div_left, Nat.mul_comm 2 n, ← Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_comm]
cases n <;> rfl; apply zero_lt_succ
/-- `choose n 2` is the `n`-th triangle number. -/
theorem choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [triangle_succ n, choose, ih]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
theorem choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0, _, hk => by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; decide
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| _ + 1, _ + 1, hk => Nat.add_pos_left (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) _
theorem choose_eq_zero_iff {n k : ℕ} : n.choose k = 0 ↔ n < k :=
⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge (mt Nat.choose_pos h.symm.not_lt), Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt⟩
theorem succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0, 0 => by decide
| 0, k + 1 => by simp [choose]
| n + 1, 0 => by simp [choose, mul_succ, Nat.add_comm]
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), Nat.add_mul, ← succ_mul_choose_eq n, mul_succ, ←
succ_mul_choose_eq n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_add, ← choose_succ_succ, ← succ_mul]
theorem choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * k ! * (n - k)! = n !
| 0, _, hk => by simp [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, succ k, hk => by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ | hk₁
· have h : choose n k * k.succ ! * (n - k)! = (k + 1) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₁ : (n - k)! = (n - k) * (n - k.succ)! := by
rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), factorial_succ]
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * k.succ ! * ((n - k) * (n - k.succ)!) = (n - k) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_lt_succ hk₁)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₃ : k * n ! ≤ n * n ! := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)
rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, Nat.add_mul,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, factorial_succ, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, Nat.add_assoc,
← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_comm]
· rw [hk₁]; simp [hk₁, Nat.mul_comm, choose, Nat.sub_self]
theorem choose_mul {n k s : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n) (hsk : s ≤ k) :
n.choose k * k.choose s = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) :=
have h : 0 < (n - k)! * (k - s)! * s ! := by apply_rules [factorial_pos, Nat.mul_pos]
Nat.mul_right_cancel h <|
calc
n.choose k * k.choose s * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) =
n.choose k * (k.choose s * s ! * (k - s)!) * (n - k)! := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc _ s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (n - k)!, Nat.mul_comm s !]
_ = n ! := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hsk, choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hkn]
_ = n.choose s * s ! * ((n - s).choose (k - s) * (k - s)! * (n - s - (k - s))!) := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.sub_le_sub_right hkn _),
choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (hsk.trans hkn)]
_ = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right hsk, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (k - s)!, Nat.mul_comm s !, Nat.mul_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
theorem choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) :
choose n k = n ! / (k ! * (n - k)!) := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]
exact (mul_div_left _ (Nat.mul_pos (factorial_pos _) (factorial_pos _))).symm
theorem add_choose (i j : ℕ) : (i + j).choose j = (i + j)! / (i ! * j !) := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.le_add_left j i), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_comm]
theorem add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (i j : ℕ) :
(i + j).choose j * i ! * j ! = (i + j)! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_right_comm]
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : k ! * (n - k)! ∣ n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]; exact Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add (i j : ℕ) : i ! * j ! ∣ (i + j)! := by
suffices i ! * (i + j - i) ! ∣ (i + j)! by
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left i j] at this
exact factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n - k) = choose n k := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial hk, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.sub_le _ _),
Nat.sub_sub_self hk, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : Nat.choose n a = Nat.choose n b := by
suffices choose n (n - b) = choose n b by
rw [h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right] at this; rwa [h]
exact choose_symm (h ▸ le_add_left _ _)
theorem choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a + b) a = choose (a + b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
theorem choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m := by
apply choose_symm_of_eq_add
rw [Nat.add_comm m 1, Nat.add_assoc 1 m m, Nat.add_comm (2 * m) 1, Nat.two_mul m]
theorem choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) := by
have e : (n + 1) * choose n k = choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) + choose n k * (k + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm (choose _ _), ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq]
rw [← Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self_right : ∀ n : ℕ, (n + 1).choose n = n + 1
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right n, choose_self]
theorem choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k * (n + 1) = (n + 1).choose k * (n + 1 - k) := by
cases k with
| zero => simp
| succ k =>
obtain hk | hk := le_or_lt (k + 1) (n + 1)
· rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, ← choose_succ_right_eq, ← succ_sub_succ,
Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ hk)]
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (n.lt_succ_self.trans hk), Nat.zero_mul,
Nat.zero_mul]
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) :
(n + 1).ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k).choose k := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n + k - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial <| Nat.le_add_left k n, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
← factorial_mul_ascFactorial, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' (n k : ℕ) :
n.ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k - 1).choose k := by
cases n
· cases k
· rw [ascFactorial_zero, choose_zero_right, factorial_zero, Nat.mul_one]
· simp only [zero_ascFactorial, zero_eq, Nat.zero_add, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.le_zero_eq, Nat.sub_zero, choose_succ_self, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
simp only [succ_add_sub_one]
theorem factorial_dvd_ascFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.ascFactorial k :=
⟨(n + k - 1).choose k, ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _⟩
|
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k).choose k = (n + 1).ascFactorial k / k ! := by
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel k.factorial_pos
rw [← ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' <| factorial_dvd_ascFactorial _ _).symm
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial' (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k - 1).choose k = n.ascFactorial k / k ! :=
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Basic.lean | 243 | 251 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.SphereNormEquiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
/-!
# Generalized polar coordinate change
Consider an `n`-dimensional normed space `E` and an additive Haar measure `μ` on `E`.
Then `μ.toSphere` is the measure on the unit sphere
such that `μ.toSphere s` equals `n • μ (Set.Ioo 0 1 • s)`.
If `n ≠ 0`, then `μ` can be represented (up to `homeomorphUnitSphereProd`)
as the product of `μ.toSphere`
and the Lebesgue measure on `(0, +∞)` taken with density `fun r ↦ r ^ n`.
One can think about this fact as a version of polar coordinate change formula
for a general nontrivial normed space.
-/
open Set Function Metric MeasurableSpace intervalIntegral
open scoped Pointwise ENNReal NNReal
local notation "dim" => Module.finrank ℝ
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E]
namespace Measure
/-- If `μ` is an additive Haar measure on a normed space `E`,
then `μ.toSphere` is the measure on the unit sphere in `E`
such that `μ.toSphere s = Module.finrank ℝ E • μ (Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 • s)`. -/
def toSphere (μ : Measure E) : Measure (sphere (0 : E) 1) :=
dim E • ((μ.comap (Subtype.val ∘ (homeomorphUnitSphereProd E).symm)).restrict
(univ ×ˢ Iio ⟨1, mem_Ioi.2 one_pos⟩)).fst
variable (μ : Measure E)
theorem toSphere_apply_aux (s : Set (sphere (0 : E) 1)) (r : Ioi (0 : ℝ)) :
μ ((↑) '' (homeomorphUnitSphereProd E ⁻¹' s ×ˢ Iio r)) = μ (Ioo (0 : ℝ) r • ((↑) '' s)) := by
rw [← image2_smul, image2_image_right, ← Homeomorph.image_symm, image_image,
← image_subtype_val_Ioi_Iio, image2_image_left, image2_swap, ← image_prod]
rfl
variable [BorelSpace E]
theorem toSphere_apply' {s : Set (sphere (0 : E) 1)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.toSphere s = dim E * μ (Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 • ((↑) '' s)) := by
rw [toSphere, smul_apply, fst_apply hs, restrict_apply (measurable_fst hs),
((MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe (measurableSet_singleton _).compl).comp
(Homeomorph.measurableEmbedding _)).comap_apply,
image_comp, Homeomorph.image_symm, univ_prod, ← Set.prod_eq, nsmul_eq_mul, toSphere_apply_aux]
theorem toSphere_apply_univ' : μ.toSphere univ = dim E * μ (ball 0 1 \ {0}) := by
rw [μ.toSphere_apply' .univ, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe, Ioo_smul_sphere_zero] <;> simp
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [μ.IsAddHaarMeasure]
|
@[simp]
theorem toSphere_apply_univ : μ.toSphere univ = dim E * μ (ball 0 1) := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/HaarToSphere.lean | 68 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Equivalence relations
This file defines the complete lattice of equivalence relations on a type, results about the
inductively defined equivalence closure of a binary relation, and the analogues of some isomorphism
theorems for quotients of arbitrary types.
## Implementation notes
The complete lattice instance for equivalence relations could have been defined by lifting
the Galois insertion of equivalence relations on α into binary relations on α, and then using
`CompleteLattice.copy` to define a complete lattice instance with more appropriate
definitional equalities (a similar example is `Filter.CompleteLattice` in
`Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean`). This does not save space, however, and is less clear.
Partitions are not defined as a separate structure here; users are encouraged to
reason about them using the existing `Setoid` and its infrastructure.
## Tags
setoid, equivalence, iseqv, relation, equivalence relation
-/
attribute [refl, simp] Setoid.refl
attribute [symm] Setoid.symm
attribute [trans] Setoid.trans
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
namespace Setoid
attribute [ext] ext
/-- Two equivalence relations are equal iff their underlying binary operations are equal. -/
theorem eq_iff_rel_eq {r₁ r₂ : Setoid α} : r₁ = r₂ ↔ ⇑r₁ = ⇑r₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, fun h => Setoid.ext fun _ _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl⟩
/-- Defining `≤` for equivalence relations. -/
instance : LE (Setoid α) :=
⟨fun r s => ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → s x y⟩
theorem le_def {r s : Setoid α} : r ≤ s ↔ ∀ {x y}, r x y → s x y :=
Iff.rfl
@[refl]
theorem refl' (r : Setoid α) (x) : r x x := r.iseqv.refl x
@[symm]
theorem symm' (r : Setoid α) : ∀ {x y}, r x y → r y x := r.iseqv.symm
@[trans]
theorem trans' (r : Setoid α) : ∀ {x y z}, r x y → r y z → r x z := r.iseqv.trans
theorem comm' (s : Setoid α) {x y} : s x y ↔ s y x :=
⟨s.symm', s.symm'⟩
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- The kernel of a function is an equivalence relation. -/
def ker (f : α → β) : Setoid α :=
⟨(· = ·) on f, eq_equivalence.comap f⟩
/-- The kernel of the quotient map induced by an equivalence relation r equals r. -/
@[simp]
theorem ker_mk_eq (r : Setoid α) : ker (@Quotient.mk'' _ r) = r :=
ext fun _ _ => Quotient.eq
theorem ker_apply_mk_out {f : α → β} (a : α) : f (⟦a⟧ : Quotient (Setoid.ker f)).out = f a :=
@Quotient.mk_out _ (Setoid.ker f) a
theorem ker_def {f : α → β} {x y : α} : ker f x y ↔ f x = f y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given types `α`, `β`, the product of two equivalence relations `r` on `α` and `s` on `β`:
`(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ α × β` are related by `r.prod s` iff `x₁` is related to `y₁`
by `r` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `s`. -/
protected def prod (r : Setoid α) (s : Setoid β) :
Setoid (α × β) where
r x y := r x.1 y.1 ∧ s x.2 y.2
iseqv :=
⟨fun x => ⟨r.refl' x.1, s.refl' x.2⟩, fun h => ⟨r.symm' h.1, s.symm' h.2⟩,
fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨r.trans' h₁.1 h₂.1, s.trans' h₁.2 h₂.2⟩⟩
lemma prod_apply {r : Setoid α} {s : Setoid β} {x₁ x₂ : α} {y₁ y₂ : β} :
@Setoid.r _ (r.prod s) (x₁, y₁) (x₂, y₂) ↔ (@Setoid.r _ r x₁ x₂ ∧ @Setoid.r _ s y₁ y₂) :=
Iff.rfl
lemma piSetoid_apply {ι : Sort*} {α : ι → Sort*} {r : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)} {x y : ∀ i, α i} :
@Setoid.r _ (@piSetoid _ _ r) x y ↔ ∀ i, @Setoid.r _ (r i) (x i) (y i) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A bijection between the product of two quotients and the quotient by the product of the
equivalence relations. -/
@[simps]
def prodQuotientEquiv (r : Setoid α) (s : Setoid β) :
Quotient r × Quotient s ≃ Quotient (r.prod s) where
toFun | (x, y) => Quotient.map₂ Prod.mk (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩) x y
invFun q := Quotient.liftOn' q (fun xy ↦ (Quotient.mk'' xy.1, Quotient.mk'' xy.2))
fun x y hxy ↦ Prod.ext (by simpa using hxy.1) (by simpa using hxy.2)
left_inv q := by
rcases q with ⟨qa, qb⟩
exact Quotient.inductionOn₂' qa qb fun _ _ ↦ rfl
right_inv q := by
simp only
refine Quotient.inductionOn' q fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- A bijection between an indexed product of quotients and the quotient by the product of the
equivalence relations. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def piQuotientEquiv {ι : Sort*} {α : ι → Sort*} (r : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)) :
(∀ i, Quotient (r i)) ≃ Quotient (@piSetoid _ _ r) where
toFun x := Quotient.mk'' fun i ↦ (x i).out
invFun q := Quotient.liftOn' q (fun x i ↦ Quotient.mk'' (x i)) fun x y hxy ↦ by
ext i
simpa using hxy i
left_inv q := by
ext i
simp
right_inv q := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn' q fun _ ↦ ?_
simp only [Quotient.liftOn'_mk'', Quotient.eq'']
intro i
change Setoid.r _ _
rw [← Quotient.eq'']
simp
/-- The infimum of two equivalence relations. -/
instance : Min (Setoid α) :=
⟨fun r s =>
⟨fun x y => r x y ∧ s x y,
⟨fun x => ⟨r.refl' x, s.refl' x⟩, fun h => ⟨r.symm' h.1, s.symm' h.2⟩, fun h1 h2 =>
⟨r.trans' h1.1 h2.1, s.trans' h1.2 h2.2⟩⟩⟩⟩
/-- The infimum of 2 equivalence relations r and s is the same relation as the infimum
of the underlying binary operations. -/
theorem inf_def {r s : Setoid α} : ⇑(r ⊓ s) = ⇑r ⊓ ⇑s :=
rfl
theorem inf_iff_and {r s : Setoid α} {x y} : (r ⊓ s) x y ↔ r x y ∧ s x y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of a set of equivalence relations. -/
instance : InfSet (Setoid α) :=
⟨fun S =>
{ r := fun x y => ∀ r ∈ S, r x y
iseqv := ⟨fun x r _ => r.refl' x, fun h r hr => r.symm' <| h r hr, fun h1 h2 r hr =>
r.trans' (h1 r hr) <| h2 r hr⟩ }⟩
/-- The underlying binary operation of the infimum of a set of equivalence relations
is the infimum of the set's image under the map to the underlying binary operation. -/
theorem sInf_def {s : Set (Setoid α)} : ⇑(sInf s) = sInf ((⇑) '' s) := by
ext
simp only [sInf_image, iInf_apply, iInf_Prop_eq]
rfl
instance : PartialOrder (Setoid α) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt r s := r ≤ s ∧ ¬s ≤ r
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ hr hs _ _ h := hs <| hr h
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm _ _ h1 h2 := Setoid.ext fun _ _ => ⟨fun h => h1 h, fun h => h2 h⟩
/-- The complete lattice of equivalence relations on a type, with bottom element `=`
and top element the trivial equivalence relation. -/
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Setoid α) :=
{ (completeLatticeOfInf (Setoid α)) fun _ =>
⟨fun _ hr _ _ h => h _ hr, fun _ hr _ _ h _ hr' => hr hr' h⟩ with
inf := Min.min
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ _ h => h.1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ _ h => h.2
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h1 h2 _ _ h => ⟨h1 h, h2 h⟩
top := ⟨fun _ _ => True, ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun h => h, fun h1 _ => h1⟩⟩
le_top := fun _ _ _ _ => trivial
bot := ⟨(· = ·), ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun h => h.symm, fun h1 h2 => h1.trans h2⟩⟩
bot_le := fun r x _ h => h ▸ r.2.1 x }
@[simp]
theorem top_def : ⇑(⊤ : Setoid α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_def : ⇑(⊥ : Setoid α) = (· = ·) :=
rfl
theorem eq_top_iff {s : Setoid α} : s = (⊤ : Setoid α) ↔ ∀ x y : α, s x y := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, Setoid.le_def, Setoid.top_def]
simp only [Pi.top_apply, Prop.top_eq_true, forall_true_left]
lemma sInf_equiv {S : Set (Setoid α)} {x y : α} :
letI := sInf S
x ≈ y ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s x y := Iff.rfl
lemma sInf_iff {S : Set (Setoid α)} {x y : α} :
sInf S x y ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s x y := Iff.rfl
lemma quotient_mk_sInf_eq {S : Set (Setoid α)} {x y : α} :
Quotient.mk (sInf S) x = Quotient.mk (sInf S) y ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s x y := by
simp [sInf_iff]
/-- The map induced between quotients by a setoid inequality. -/
def map_of_le {s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Quotient s → Quotient t :=
Quotient.map' id h
/-- The map from the quotient of the infimum of a set of setoids into the quotient
by an element of this set. -/
def map_sInf {S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) :
Quotient (sInf S) → Quotient s :=
Setoid.map_of_le fun _ _ a ↦ a s h
section EqvGen
open Relation
/-- The inductively defined equivalence closure of a binary relation r is the infimum
of the set of all equivalence relations containing r. -/
theorem eqvGen_eq (r : α → α → Prop) :
EqvGen.setoid r = sInf { s : Setoid α | ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → s x y } :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ _ H =>
EqvGen.rec (fun _ _ h _ hs => hs h) (refl' _) (fun _ _ _ => symm' _)
(fun _ _ _ _ _ => trans' _) H)
(sInf_le fun _ _ h => EqvGen.rel _ _ h)
/-- The supremum of two equivalence relations r and s is the equivalence closure of the binary
relation `x is related to y by r or s`. -/
theorem sup_eq_eqvGen (r s : Setoid α) :
r ⊔ s = EqvGen.setoid fun x y => r x y ∨ s x y := by
rw [eqvGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
simp only [le_def, or_imp, ← forall_and]
/-- The supremum of 2 equivalence relations r and s is the equivalence closure of the
supremum of the underlying binary operations. -/
theorem sup_def {r s : Setoid α} : r ⊔ s = EqvGen.setoid (⇑r ⊔ ⇑s) := by
rw [sup_eq_eqvGen]; rfl
/-- The supremum of a set S of equivalence relations is the equivalence closure of the binary
relation `there exists r ∈ S relating x and y`. -/
theorem sSup_eq_eqvGen (S : Set (Setoid α)) :
sSup S = EqvGen.setoid fun x y => ∃ r : Setoid α, r ∈ S ∧ r x y := by
rw [eqvGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
simp only [upperBounds, le_def, and_imp, exists_imp]
ext
exact ⟨fun H x y r hr => H hr, fun H r hr x y => H r hr⟩
/-- The supremum of a set of equivalence relations is the equivalence closure of the
supremum of the set's image under the map to the underlying binary operation. -/
theorem sSup_def {s : Set (Setoid α)} : sSup s = EqvGen.setoid (sSup ((⇑) '' s)) := by
rw [sSup_eq_eqvGen, sSup_image]
congr with (x y)
simp only [iSup_apply, iSup_Prop_eq, exists_prop]
/-- The equivalence closure of an equivalence relation r is r. -/
@[simp]
theorem eqvGen_of_setoid (r : Setoid α) : EqvGen.setoid r.r = r :=
le_antisymm (by rw [eqvGen_eq]; exact sInf_le fun _ _ => id) EqvGen.rel
/-- Equivalence closure is idempotent. -/
theorem eqvGen_idem (r : α → α → Prop) : EqvGen.setoid (EqvGen.setoid r) = EqvGen.setoid r :=
eqvGen_of_setoid _
/-- The equivalence closure of a binary relation r is contained in any equivalence
relation containing r. -/
theorem eqvGen_le {r : α → α → Prop} {s : Setoid α} (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) :
EqvGen.setoid r ≤ s := by rw [eqvGen_eq]; exact sInf_le h
/-- Equivalence closure of binary relations is monotone. -/
theorem eqvGen_mono {r s : α → α → Prop} (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) :
EqvGen.setoid r ≤ EqvGen.setoid s :=
eqvGen_le fun _ _ hr => EqvGen.rel _ _ <| h _ _ hr
/-- There is a Galois insertion of equivalence relations on α into binary relations
on α, with equivalence closure the lower adjoint. -/
def gi : @GaloisInsertion (α → α → Prop) (Setoid α) _ _ EqvGen.setoid (⇑) where
choice r _ := EqvGen.setoid r
gc _ s := ⟨fun H _ _ h => H <| EqvGen.rel _ _ h, fun H => eqvGen_of_setoid s ▸ eqvGen_mono H⟩
le_l_u x := (eqvGen_of_setoid x).symm ▸ le_refl x
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
end EqvGen
open Function
/-- A function from α to β is injective iff its kernel is the bottom element of the complete lattice
of equivalence relations on α. -/
theorem injective_iff_ker_bot (f : α → β) : Injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ :=
(@eq_bot_iff (Setoid α) _ _ (ker f)).symm
/-- The elements related to x ∈ α by the kernel of f are those in the preimage of f(x) under f. -/
theorem ker_iff_mem_preimage {f : α → β} {x y} : ker f x y ↔ x ∈ f ⁻¹' {f y} :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Equivalence between functions `α → β` such that `r x y → f x = f y` and functions
`quotient r → β`. -/
def liftEquiv (r : Setoid α) : { f : α → β // r ≤ ker f } ≃ (Quotient r → β) where
toFun f := Quotient.lift (f : α → β) f.2
invFun f := ⟨f ∘ Quotient.mk'', fun x y h => by simp [ker_def, Quotient.sound' h]⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => rfl
right_inv _ := funext fun x => Quotient.inductionOn' x fun _ => rfl
/-- The uniqueness part of the universal property for quotients of an arbitrary type. -/
theorem lift_unique {r : Setoid α} {f : α → β} (H : r ≤ ker f) (g : Quotient r → β)
(Hg : f = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') : Quotient.lift f H = g := by
ext ⟨x⟩
rw [← Quotient.mk, Quotient.lift_mk f H, Hg, Function.comp_apply, Quotient.mk''_eq_mk]
/-- Given a map f from α to β, the natural map from the quotient of α by the kernel of f is
| injective. -/
theorem ker_lift_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (@Quotient.lift _ _ (ker f) f fun _ _ h => h) :=
fun x y => Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound' h
/-- Given a map f from α to β, the kernel of f is the unique equivalence relation on α whose
| Mathlib/Data/Setoid/Basic.lean | 319 | 323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-! # Free modules over PID
A free `R`-module `M` is a module with a basis over `R`,
equivalently it is an `R`-module linearly equivalent to `ι →₀ R` for some `ι`.
This file proves a submodule of a free `R`-module of finite rank is also
a free `R`-module of finite rank, if `R` is a principal ideal domain (PID),
i.e. we have instances `[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]`.
We express "free `R`-module of finite rank" as a module `M` which has a basis
`b : ι → R`, where `ι` is a `Fintype`.
We call the cardinality of `ι` the rank of `M` in this file;
it would be equal to `finrank R M` if `R` is a field and `M` is a vector space.
## Main results
In this section, `M` is a free and finitely generated `R`-module, and
`N` is a submodule of `M`.
- `Submodule.inductionOnRank`: if `P` holds for `⊥ : Submodule R M` and if
`P N` follows from `P N'` for all `N'` that are of lower rank, then `P` holds
on all submodules
- `Submodule.exists_basis_of_pid`: if `R` is a PID, then `N : Submodule R M` is
free and finitely generated. This is the first part of the structure theorem
for modules.
- `Submodule.smithNormalForm`: if `R` is a PID, then `M` has a basis
`bM` and `N` has a basis `bN` such that `bN i = a i • bM i`.
Equivalently, a linear map `f : M →ₗ M` with `range f = N` can be written as
a matrix in Smith normal form, a diagonal matrix with the coefficients `a i`
along the diagonal.
## Tags
free module, finitely generated module, rank, structure theorem
-/
universe u v
section Ring
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
open Submodule.IsPrincipal Submodule
theorem eq_bot_of_generator_maximal_map_eq_zero (b : Basis ι R M) {N : Submodule R M}
{ϕ : M →ₗ[R] R} (hϕ : ∀ ψ : M →ₗ[R] R, ¬N.map ϕ < N.map ψ) [(N.map ϕ).IsPrincipal]
(hgen : generator (N.map ϕ) = (0 : R)) : N = ⊥ := by
rw [Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
refine b.ext_elem fun i ↦ ?_
rw [(eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).mpr hgen] at hϕ
rw [LinearEquiv.map_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply]
exact
(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp (not_bot_lt_iff.1 <| hϕ (Finsupp.lapply i ∘ₗ ↑b.repr)) _
⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem eq_bot_of_generator_maximal_submoduleImage_eq_zero {N O : Submodule R M} (b : Basis ι R O)
(hNO : N ≤ O) {ϕ : O →ₗ[R] R} (hϕ : ∀ ψ : O →ₗ[R] R, ¬ϕ.submoduleImage N < ψ.submoduleImage N)
| [(ϕ.submoduleImage N).IsPrincipal] (hgen : generator (ϕ.submoduleImage N) = 0) : N = ⊥ := by
rw [Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
refine (mk_eq_zero _ _).mp (show (⟨x, hNO hx⟩ : O) = 0 from b.ext_elem fun i ↦ ?_)
rw [(eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).mpr hgen] at hϕ
rw [LinearEquiv.map_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply]
refine (Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp (not_bot_lt_iff.1 <| hϕ (Finsupp.lapply i ∘ₗ ↑b.repr)) _ ?_
exact (LinearMap.mem_submoduleImage_of_le hNO).mpr ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
end Ring
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FreeModule/PID.lean | 72 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.SubboxInduction
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Tagged
/-!
# Induction on subboxes
In this file we prove (see
`BoxIntegral.Box.exists_taggedPartition_isHenstock_isSubordinate_homothetic`) that for every box `I`
in `ℝⁿ` and a function `r : ℝⁿ → ℝ` positive on `I` there exists a tagged partition `π` of `I` such
that
* `π` is a Henstock partition;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* each box in `π` is homothetic to `I` with coefficient of the form `1 / 2 ^ n`.
Later we will use this lemma to prove that the Henstock filter is nontrivial, hence the Henstock
integral is well-defined.
## Tags
partition, tagged partition, Henstock integral
-/
namespace BoxIntegral
open Set Metric
open Topology
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I J : Box ι}
namespace Prepartition
/-- Split a box in `ℝⁿ` into `2 ^ n` boxes by hyperplanes passing through its center. -/
def splitCenter (I : Box ι) : Prepartition I where
boxes := Finset.univ.map (Box.splitCenterBoxEmb I)
le_of_mem' := by simp [I.splitCenterBox_le]
pairwiseDisjoint := by
rw [Finset.coe_map, Finset.coe_univ, image_univ]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩ Hne
exact I.disjoint_splitCenterBox (mt (congr_arg _) Hne)
@[simp]
theorem mem_splitCenter : J ∈ splitCenter I ↔ ∃ s, I.splitCenterBox s = J := by simp [splitCenter]
theorem isPartition_splitCenter (I : Box ι) : IsPartition (splitCenter I) := fun x hx => by
simp [hx]
theorem upper_sub_lower_of_mem_splitCenter (h : J ∈ splitCenter I) (i : ι) :
J.upper i - J.lower i = (I.upper i - I.lower i) / 2 :=
| let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_splitCenter.1 h
hs ▸ I.upper_sub_lower_splitCenterBox s i
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/SubboxInduction.lean | 59 | 60 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
/-!
# Basic definitions about impartial (pre-)games
We will define an impartial game, one in which left and right can make exactly the same moves.
Our definition differs slightly by saying that the game is always equivalent to its negative,
no matter what moves are played. This allows for games such as poker-nim to be classified as
impartial.
-/
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
private def ImpartialAux (G : PGame) : Prop :=
(G ≈ -G) ∧ (∀ i, ImpartialAux (G.moveLeft i)) ∧ ∀ j, ImpartialAux (G.moveRight j)
termination_by G
/-- An impartial game is one that's equivalent to its negative, such that each left and right move
is also impartial.
Note that this is a slightly more general definition than the one that's usually in the literature,
as we don't require `G ≡ -G`. Despite this, the Sprague-Grundy theorem still holds: see
`SetTheory.PGame.equiv_nim_grundyValue`.
In such a game, both players have the same payoffs at any subposition. -/
class Impartial (G : PGame) : Prop where
out : ImpartialAux G
private theorem impartial_iff_aux {G : PGame} : G.Impartial ↔ G.ImpartialAux :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem impartial_def {G : PGame} :
G.Impartial ↔ G ≈ -G ∧ (∀ i, Impartial (G.moveLeft i)) ∧ ∀ j, Impartial (G.moveRight j) := by
simp_rw [impartial_iff_aux]
rw [ImpartialAux]
namespace Impartial
instance impartial_zero : Impartial 0 := by
rw [impartial_def]
simp
instance impartial_star : Impartial star := by
rw [impartial_def]
simpa using Impartial.impartial_zero
theorem neg_equiv_self (G : PGame) [h : G.Impartial] : G ≈ -G :=
(impartial_def.1 h).1
@[simp]
theorem mk'_neg_equiv_self (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : -(⟦G⟧ : Game) = ⟦G⟧ :=
game_eq (Equiv.symm (neg_equiv_self G))
instance moveLeft_impartial {G : PGame} [h : G.Impartial] (i : G.LeftMoves) :
(G.moveLeft i).Impartial :=
(impartial_def.1 h).2.1 i
instance moveRight_impartial {G : PGame} [h : G.Impartial] (j : G.RightMoves) :
(G.moveRight j).Impartial :=
(impartial_def.1 h).2.2 j
theorem impartial_congr {G H : PGame} (e : G ≡r H) [G.Impartial] : H.Impartial :=
impartial_def.2
⟨Equiv.trans e.symm.equiv (Equiv.trans (neg_equiv_self G) (neg_equiv_neg_iff.2 e.equiv)),
fun i => impartial_congr (e.moveLeftSymm i), fun j => impartial_congr (e.moveRightSymm j)⟩
termination_by G
instance impartial_add (G H : PGame) [G.Impartial] [H.Impartial] : (G + H).Impartial := by
rw [impartial_def]
refine ⟨Equiv.trans (add_congr (neg_equiv_self G) (neg_equiv_self _))
(Equiv.symm (negAddRelabelling _ _).equiv), fun k => ?_, fun k => ?_⟩
· apply leftMoves_add_cases k
all_goals
intro i; simp only [add_moveLeft_inl, add_moveLeft_inr]
apply impartial_add
· apply rightMoves_add_cases k
all_goals
intro i; simp only [add_moveRight_inl, add_moveRight_inr]
apply impartial_add
termination_by (G, H)
instance impartial_neg (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : (-G).Impartial := by
rw [impartial_def]
refine ⟨?_, fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩
· rw [neg_neg]
exact Equiv.symm (neg_equiv_self G)
· rw [moveLeft_neg]
exact impartial_neg _
· rw [moveRight_neg]
exact impartial_neg _
termination_by G
variable (G : PGame) [Impartial G]
theorem nonpos : ¬0 < G := by
apply (lt_asymm · ?_)
rwa [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_zero, ← lt_congr_right (neg_equiv_self G)]
theorem nonneg : ¬G < 0 := by
simpa using nonpos (-G)
/-- In an impartial game, either the first player always wins, or the second player always wins. -/
theorem equiv_or_fuzzy_zero : G ≈ 0 ∨ G ‖ 0 := by
rcases lt_or_equiv_or_gt_or_fuzzy G 0 with (h | h | h | h)
· exact ((nonneg G) h).elim
· exact Or.inl h
· exact ((nonpos G) h).elim
· exact Or.inr h
@[simp]
theorem not_equiv_zero_iff : ¬ G ≈ 0 ↔ G ‖ 0 :=
⟨(equiv_or_fuzzy_zero G).resolve_left, Fuzzy.not_equiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_fuzzy_zero_iff : ¬ G ‖ 0 ↔ G ≈ 0 :=
⟨(equiv_or_fuzzy_zero G).resolve_right, Equiv.not_fuzzy⟩
theorem add_self : G + G ≈ 0 :=
Equiv.trans (add_congr_left (neg_equiv_self G)) (neg_add_cancel_equiv G)
@[simp]
theorem mk'_add_self : (⟦G⟧ : Game) + ⟦G⟧ = 0 :=
game_eq (add_self G)
/-- This lemma doesn't require `H` to be impartial. -/
theorem equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero (H : PGame) : H ≈ G ↔ H + G ≈ 0 := by
rw [equiv_iff_game_eq, ← add_right_cancel_iff (a := ⟦G⟧), mk'_add_self, ← quot_add,
equiv_iff_game_eq, quot_zero]
/-- This lemma doesn't require `H` to be impartial. -/
theorem equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero' (H : PGame) : G ≈ H ↔ G + H ≈ 0 := by
rw [equiv_iff_game_eq, ← add_left_cancel_iff, mk'_add_self, ← quot_add, equiv_iff_game_eq,
Eq.comm, quot_zero]
theorem le_zero_iff {G : PGame} [G.Impartial] : G ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ G := by
rw [← zero_le_neg_iff, le_congr_right (neg_equiv_self G)]
theorem lf_zero_iff {G : PGame} [G.Impartial] : G ⧏ 0 ↔ 0 ⧏ G := by
rw [← zero_lf_neg_iff, lf_congr_right (neg_equiv_self G)]
theorem equiv_zero_iff_le : (G ≈ 0) ↔ G ≤ 0 :=
⟨And.left, fun h => ⟨h, le_zero_iff.1 h⟩⟩
theorem fuzzy_zero_iff_lf : G ‖ 0 ↔ G ⧏ 0 :=
⟨And.left, fun h => ⟨h, lf_zero_iff.1 h⟩⟩
theorem equiv_zero_iff_ge : (G ≈ 0) ↔ 0 ≤ G :=
⟨And.right, fun h => ⟨le_zero_iff.2 h, h⟩⟩
theorem fuzzy_zero_iff_gf : G ‖ 0 ↔ 0 ⧏ G :=
⟨And.right, fun h => ⟨lf_zero_iff.2 h, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_leftMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero : (∀ i, G.moveLeft i ‖ 0) ↔ G ≈ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hb => ?_, fun hp i => ?_⟩
· rw [equiv_zero_iff_le G, le_zero_lf]
exact fun i => (hb i).1
· rw [fuzzy_zero_iff_lf]
exact hp.1.moveLeft_lf i
theorem forall_rightMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero : (∀ j, G.moveRight j ‖ 0) ↔ G ≈ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hb => ?_, fun hp i => ?_⟩
· rw [equiv_zero_iff_ge G, zero_le_lf]
exact fun i => (hb i).2
· rw [fuzzy_zero_iff_gf]
| exact hp.2.lf_moveRight i
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Impartial.lean | 179 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Multilinear maps
We define multilinear maps as maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are linear in each
coordinate. Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type
(although some statements will require it to be a fintype). This space, denoted by
`MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂`, inherits a module structure by pointwise addition and multiplication.
## Main definitions
* `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of multilinear maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`.
* `f.map_update_smul` is the multiplicativity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_update_add` is the additivity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_smul_univ` expresses the multiplicativity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`.
* `f.map_add_univ` expresses the additivity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time, writing
`f (m + m')` as the sum over all subsets `s` of `ι` of `f (s.piecewise m m')`.
* `f.map_sum` expresses `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` as the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all possible functions.
See `Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry` for the currying of multilinear maps.
## Implementation notes
Expressing that a map is linear along the `i`-th coordinate when all other coordinates are fixed
can be done in two (equivalent) different ways:
* fixing a vector `m : ∀ (j : ι - i), M₁ j.val`, and then choosing separately the `i`-th coordinate
* fixing a vector `m : ∀j, M₁ j`, and then modifying its `i`-th coordinate
The second way is more artificial as the value of `m` at `i` is not relevant, but it has the
advantage of avoiding subtype inclusion issues. This is the definition we use, based on
`Function.update` that allows to change the value of `m` at `i`.
Note that the use of `Function.update` requires a `DecidableEq ι` term to appear somewhere in the
statement of `MultilinearMap.map_update_add'` and `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul'`.
Three possible choices are:
1. Requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `MultilinearMap` (as we did originally).
2. Using `Classical.decEq ι` in the statement of `map_add'` and `map_smul'`.
3. Quantifying over all possible `DecidableEq ι` instances in the statement of `map_add'` and
`map_smul'`.
Option 1 works fine, but puts unnecessary constraints on the user
(the zero map certainly does not need decidability).
Option 2 looks great at first, but in the common case when `ι = Fin n`
it introduces non-defeq decidability instance diamonds
within the context of proving `map_update_add'` and `map_update_smul'`,
of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = Classical.decEq (Fin n)`.
Option 3 of course does something similar, but of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = _inst`,
which is much easier to clean up since `_inst` is a free variable
and so the equality can just be substituted.
-/
open Fin Function Finset Set
universe uR uS uι v v' v₁ v₂ v₃
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS} {ι : Type uι} {n : ℕ}
{M : Fin n.succ → Type v} {M₁ : ι → Type v₁} {M₂ : Type v₂} {M₃ : Type v₃} {M' : Type v'}
-- Don't generate injectivity lemmas, which the `simpNF` linter will time out on.
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- Multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules
over `R`. -/
structure MultilinearMap (R : Type uR) {ι : Type uι} (M₁ : ι → Type v₁) (M₂ : Type v₂) [Semiring R]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] where
/-- The underlying multivariate function of a multilinear map. -/
toFun : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂
/-- A multilinear map is additive in every argument. -/
map_update_add' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (x + y)) = toFun (update m i x) + toFun (update m i y)
/-- A multilinear map is compatible with scalar multiplication in every argument. -/
map_update_smul' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (c • x)) = c • toFun (update m i x)
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[Module R M₃] [Module R M'] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : FunLike (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; cases h; rfl
initialize_simps_projections MultilinearMap (toFun → apply)
/-- Constructor for `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` when the
index type `ι` is already endowed with a `DecidableEq` instance. -/
@[simps]
def mk' [DecidableEq ι] (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂)
(h₁ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) := by aesop)
(h₂ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) := by aesop) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' m i x y := by convert h₁ m i x y
map_update_smul' m i c x := by convert h₂ m i c x
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) (h₁ h₂) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem congr_fun {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (h : f = g) (x : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
nonrec theorem congr_arg (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {x y : ∀ i, M₁ i} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} : (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_update_add' m i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add' := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
/-- Earlier, this name was used by what is now called `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul_left`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' m i c x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul' := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ∀ i, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 := by
classical
have : (0 : R) • (0 : M₁ i) = 0 := by simp
rw [← update_eq_self i m, h, ← this, f.map_update_smul, zero_smul]
@[simp]
theorem map_update_zero [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : f (update m i 0) = 0 :=
f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ Set.univ := Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty ι
exact map_coord_zero f i rfl
instance : Add (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f f' =>
⟨fun x => f x + f' x, fun m i x y => by simp [add_left_comm, add_assoc], fun m i c x => by
simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m :=
rfl
instance : Zero (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => 0, fun _ _ _ _ => by simp, fun _ _ c _ => by simp⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) m = 0 :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [DistribSMul S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
instance : SMul S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun c f =>
⟨fun m => c • f m, fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add], fun l i x d => by
simp [← smul_comm x c (_ : M₂)]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (c : S) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
theorem coe_smul (c : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : ⇑(c • f) = c • (⇑ f) := rfl
end SMul
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Coercion of a multilinear map to a function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def coeAddMonoidHom : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →+ (((i : ι) → M₁ i) → M₂) where
toFun := DFunLike.coe; map_zero' := rfl; map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, ⇑(f a) :=
map_sum coeAddMonoidHom f s
theorem sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) {s : Finset α} :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a) m = ∑ a ∈ s, f a m := by simp
/-- If `f` is a multilinear map, then `f.toLinearMap m i` is the linear map obtained by fixing all
coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the `i`-th coordinate. -/
@[simps]
def toLinearMap [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun x := f (update m i x)
map_add' x y := by simp
map_smul' c x := by simp
/-- The cartesian product of two multilinear maps, as a multilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) where
toFun m := (f m, g m)
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
/-- Combine a family of multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `∀ i, M' i`. -/
@[simps]
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, MultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) : MultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
toFun m i := f i m
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_add _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_smul _ _ _ _
section
variable (R M₂ M₃)
/-- Equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃` and one-multilinear maps. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f (x i)
map_update_add' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton]
map_update_smul' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f fun _ ↦ x
map_add' := fun x y ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_add 0 i x y
map_smul' := fun c x ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_smul 0 i c x }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext x; refine congr_arg f ?_; exact (eq_const_of_subsingleton _ _).symm
variable (M₁) {M₂}
/-- The constant map is multilinear when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := Function.const _ m
map_update_add' _ := isEmptyElim
map_update_smul' _ := isEmptyElim
end
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `Fin n`) and a subset `s` of `k`
of these variables, one gets a new multilinear map on `Fin k` by varying these variables, and fixing
the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by `f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a
proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit identification between `Fin k` and `s` that
we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => M') M₂) (s : Finset (Fin n))
(hk : #s = k) (z : M') : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin k => M') M₂ where
toFun v := f fun j => if h : j ∈ s then v ((s.orderIsoOfFin hk).symm ⟨j, h⟩) else z
/- Porting note: The proofs of the following two lemmas used to only use `erw` followed by `simp`,
but it seems `erw` no longer unfolds or unifies well enough to work without more help. -/
map_update_add' v i x y := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
map_update_smul' v i c x := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x + y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `snoc`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (x y : M (last n)) :
f (snoc m (x + y)) = f (snoc m x) + f (snoc m y) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_snoc_last]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (c : R)
(x : M (last n)) : f (snoc m (c • x)) = c • f (snoc m x) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_snoc_last]
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)]
variable {M₁'' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁'' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁'' i)]
/-- If `g` is a multilinear map and `f` is a collection of linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a multilinear map, that we call
`g.compLinearMap f`. -/
def compLinearMap (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun m := g fun i => f i (m i)
map_update_add' m i x y := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_apply (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : g.compLinearMap f m = g fun i => f i (m i) :=
rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map twice with a linear map in each argument is
the same as composing with their composition. -/
theorem compLinearMap_assoc (g : MultilinearMap R M₁'' M₂) (f₁ : ∀ i, M₁' i →ₗ[R] M₁'' i)
(f₂ : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap f₁).compLinearMap f₂ = g.compLinearMap fun i => f₁ i ∘ₗ f₂ i :=
rfl
/-- Composing the zero multilinear map with a linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_compLinearMap (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(0 : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂).compLinearMap f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map with the identity linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_id (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) :
(g.compLinearMap fun _ => LinearMap.id) = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing with a family of surjective linear maps is injective. -/
theorem compLinearMap_injective (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i)) :
Injective fun g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ => g.compLinearMap f := fun g₁ g₂ h =>
ext fun x => by
simpa [fun i => surjInv_eq (hf i)]
using MultilinearMap.ext_iff.mp h fun i => surjInv (hf i) (x i)
theorem compLinearMap_inj (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i))
(g₁ g₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) : g₁.compLinearMap f = g₂.compLinearMap f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
(compLinearMap_injective _ hf).eq_iff
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear equiv on each argument gives the zero map
if and only if the multilinear map is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem comp_linearEquiv_eq_zero_iff (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i ≃ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)) = 0 ↔ g = 0 := by
set f' := fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
rw [← zero_compLinearMap f', compLinearMap_inj f' fun i => (f i).surjective]
end
/-- If one adds to a vector `m'` another vector `m`, but only for coordinates in a finset `t`, then
the image under a multilinear map `f` is the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` along all subsets `s` of
`t`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when `t = univ`, given in
`map_add_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not require the index set `ι`
to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_add [DecidableEq ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) (t : Finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s ∈ t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
revert m'
refine Finset.induction_on t (by simp) ?_
intro i t hit Hrec m'
have A : (insert i t).piecewise (m + m') m' = update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i + m' i) :=
t.piecewise_insert _ _ _
have B : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m' i) = t.piecewise (m + m') m' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [hit]
· simp [h]
let m'' := update m' i (m i)
have C : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i) = t.piecewise (m + m'') m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ t <;> simp [m'', h, hit, h']
rw [A, f.map_update_add, B, C, Finset.sum_powerset_insert hit, Hrec, Hrec, add_comm (_ : M₂)]
congr 1
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun s hs => ?_
have : (insert i s).piecewise m m' = s.piecewise m m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', Finset.not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem hs hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ s <;> simp [m'', h, h']
rw [this]
/-- Additivity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
theorem map_add_univ [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : Finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
simpa using f.map_piecewise_add m m' Finset.univ
section ApplySum
variable {α : ι → Type*} (g : ∀ i, α i → M₁ i) (A : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
open Fintype Finset
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. Here, we give an auxiliary statement tailored for an inductive proof. Use instead
`map_sum_finset`. -/
theorem map_sum_finset_aux [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ} (h : (∑ i, #(A i)) = n) :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
letI := fun i => Classical.decEq (α i)
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on generalizing A with | h n IH =>
-- If one of the sets is empty, then all the sums are zero
by_cases Ai_empty : ∃ i, A i = ∅
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j = 0 := Ai_empty.imp fun i hi ↦ by simp [hi]
have hpi : piFinset A = ∅ := by simpa
rw [f.map_coord_zero i hi, hpi, Finset.sum_empty]
push_neg at Ai_empty
-- Otherwise, if all sets are at most singletons, then they are exactly singletons and the result
-- is again straightforward
by_cases Ai_singleton : ∀ i, #(A i) ≤ 1
· have Ai_card : ∀ i, #(A i) = 1 := by
intro i
have pos : #(A i) ≠ 0 := by simp [Finset.card_eq_zero, Ai_empty i]
have : #(A i) ≤ 1 := Ai_singleton i
exact le_antisymm this (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (_root_.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr pos))
have :
∀ r : ∀ i, α i, r ∈ piFinset A → (f fun i => g i (r i)) = f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j := by
intro r hr
congr with i
have : ∀ j ∈ A i, g i j = g i (r i) := by
intro j hj
congr
apply Finset.card_le_one_iff.1 (Ai_singleton i) hj
exact mem_piFinset.mp hr i
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.sum_const, Ai_card i, one_nsmul]
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Ai_card, card_piFinset, prod_const_one, one_nsmul,
Finset.sum_const]
-- Remains the interesting case where one of the `A i`, say `A i₀`, has cardinality at least 2.
-- We will split into two parts `B i₀` and `C i₀` of smaller cardinality, let `B i = C i = A i`
-- for `i ≠ i₀`, apply the inductive assumption to `B` and `C`, and add up the corresponding
-- parts to get the sum for `A`.
push_neg at Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ : ∃ i, 1 < #(A i) := Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨j₁, j₂, _, hj₂, _⟩ : ∃ j₁ j₂, j₁ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₂ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₁ ≠ j₂ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.1 hi₀
let B := Function.update A i₀ (A i₀ \ {j₂})
let C := Function.update A i₀ {j₂}
have B_subset_A : ∀ i, B i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [B, sdiff_subset, update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
have C_subset_A : ∀ i, C i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [C, hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
-- split the sum at `i₀` as the sum over `B i₀` plus the sum over `C i₀`, to use additivity.
have A_eq_BC :
(fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) =
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀
((∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) + ∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi, update_self]
have : A i₀ = B i₀ ∪ C i₀ := by
simp only [B, C, Function.update_self, Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
symm
simp only [hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.union_eq_left]
rw [this]
refine Finset.sum_union <| Finset.disjoint_right.2 fun j hj => ?_
have : j = j₂ := by
simpa [C] using hj
rw [this]
simp only [B, mem_sdiff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, not_false_iff, Finset.mem_singleton,
update_self, and_false]
· simp [hi]
have Beq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ B i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
have Ceq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ C i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
-- Express the inductive assumption for `B`
have Brec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ B i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset B, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : ∑ i, #(B i) < ∑ i, #(A i) := by
refine sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => card_le_card (B_subset_A i)) ⟨i₀, mem_univ _, ?_⟩
have : {j₂} ⊆ A i₀ := by simp [hj₂]
simp only [B, Finset.card_sdiff this, Function.update_self, Finset.card_singleton]
exact Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (lt_trans Nat.zero_lt_one hi₀))
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this B rfl
-- Express the inductive assumption for `C`
have Crec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ C i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset C, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : (∑ i, #(C i)) < ∑ i, #(A i) :=
Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => Finset.card_le_card (C_subset_A i))
⟨i₀, Finset.mem_univ _, by simp [C, hi₀]⟩
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this C rfl
have D : Disjoint (piFinset B) (piFinset C) :=
haveI : Disjoint (B i₀) (C i₀) := by simp [B, C]
piFinset_disjoint_of_disjoint B C this
have pi_BC : piFinset A = piFinset B ∪ piFinset C := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm
· intro r hr
by_cases hri₀ : r i₀ = j₂
· apply Finset.mem_union_right
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ C i₀ := by simp [C, hri₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [C, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· apply Finset.mem_union_left
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ B i₀ := by simp [B, hri₀, mem_piFinset.1 hr i₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [B, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· exact
Finset.union_subset (piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => B_subset_A i)
(piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => C_subset_A i)
rw [A_eq_BC]
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, Beq, Ceq, Brec, Crec, pi_BC]
rw [← Finset.sum_union D]
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum_finset [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset_aux _ _ rfl
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
(f fun i => ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : ∀ i, α i, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset g fun _ => Finset.univ
theorem map_update_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (t : Finset α) (i : ι) (g : α → M₁ i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f (update m i (∑ a ∈ t, g a)) = ∑ a ∈ t, f (update m i (g a)) := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, ih]
end ApplySum
/-- Restrict the codomain of a multilinear map to a submodule.
This is the multilinear version of `LinearMap.codRestrict`. -/
@[simps]
def codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ p where
toFun v := ⟨f v, h v⟩
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_add _ _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_smul _ _ _ _ _
section RestrictScalar
variable (R)
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [SMul R A] [∀ i : ι, Module A (M₁ i)] [Module A M₂]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower R A (M₁ i)] [IsScalarTower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' := f.map_update_add
map_update_smul' m i := (f.toLinearMap m i).map_smul_of_tower
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ⇑(f.restrictScalars R) = f :=
rfl
end RestrictScalar
section
variable {ι₁ ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
/-- Transfer the arguments to a map along an equivalence between argument indices.
The naming is derived from `Finsupp.domCongr`, noting that here the permutation applies to the
domain of the domain. -/
@[simps apply]
def domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun v := m fun i => v (σ i)
map_update_add' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_smul]
theorem domDomCongr_trans (σ₁ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (σ₂ : ι₂ ≃ ι₃)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₁.trans σ₂) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
theorem domDomCongr_mul (σ₁ : Equiv.Perm ι₁) (σ₂ : Equiv.Perm ι₁)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₂ * σ₁) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as an equivalence.
This is declared separately because it does not work with dot notation. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrEquiv (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun := domDomCongr σ
invFun := domDomCongr σ.symm
left_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
right_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
/-- The results of applying `domDomCongr` to two maps are equal if
and only if those maps are. -/
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_eq_iff (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (f g : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
f.domDomCongr σ = g.domDomCongr σ ↔ f = g :=
(domDomCongrEquiv σ : _ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ => M₂) M₃).apply_eq_iff_eq
end
/-! If `{a // P a}` is a subtype of `ι` and if we fix an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`,
then a multilinear map on `M₁` defines a multilinear map on the restriction of `M₁` to
`{a // P a}`, by fixing the arguments out of `{a // P a}` equal to the values of `z`. -/
lemma domDomRestrict_aux {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then Function.update x i c ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h, Function.update_self]
simp only [i.2, update_self, dite_true]
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h]
by_cases h' : P j
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_true]
have h'' : ¬ ⟨j, h'⟩ = i :=
fun he => by apply_fun (fun x => x.1) at he; exact h he
rw [Function.update_of_ne h'']
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_false]
lemma domDomRestrict_aux_right {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // ¬ P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else Function.update z i c ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
simpa only [dite_not] using domDomRestrict_aux _ z (fun j ↦ x ⟨j.1, not_not.mp j.2⟩) i c
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `(i : ι) → M i`, a (decidable) predicate `P` on `ι` and
an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`, construct a multilinear map on
`(i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i)` whose value at `x` is `f` evaluated at the vector with `i`th coordinate
`x i` if `P i` and `z i` otherwise.
The naming is similar to `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr`: here we are applying the restriction to the
domain of the domain.
For a linear map version, see `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrictₗ`.
-/
def domDomRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
(z : (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂ where
toFun x := f (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩)
map_update_add' x i a b := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' z i c a := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul]
@[simp]
lemma domDomRestrict_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred P] (x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
f.domDomRestrict P z x = f (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) := rfl
-- TODO: Should add a ref here when available.
/-- The "derivative" of a multilinear map, as a linear map from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`.
For continuous multilinear maps, this will indeed be the derivative. -/
def linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) : ((i : ι) → M₁ i) →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
∑ i : ι, (f.toLinearMap x i).comp (LinearMap.proj i)
@[simp]
lemma linearDeriv_apply [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x y : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f.linearDeriv x y = ∑ i, f (update x i (y i)) := by
unfold linearDeriv
simp only [LinearMap.coeFn_sum, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_proj, Finset.sum_apply,
Function.comp_apply, Function.eval, toLinearMap_apply]
end Semiring
end MultilinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M']
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear map gives again a multilinear map. -/
def compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g ∘ f
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
⇑(g.compMultilinearMap f) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_apply (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
g.compMultilinearMap f m = g (f m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_zero (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
g.compMultilinearMap (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = 0 :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_zero g
@[simp]
theorem zero_compMultilinearMap (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).compMultilinearMap f = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_add (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (f₁ + f₂) = g.compMultilinearMap f₁ + g.compMultilinearMap f₂ :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_add g _ _
@[simp]
theorem add_compMultilinearMap (g₁ g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).compMultilinearMap f = g₁.compMultilinearMap f + g₂.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_smul [DistribSMul S M₂] [DistribSMul S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (s • f) = s • g.compMultilinearMap f :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => g.map_smul_of_tower _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul_compMultilinearMap [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(s • g).compMultilinearMap f = s • g.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.subtype_comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem subtype_compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(h) : p.subtype.compMultilinearMap (f.codRestrict p h) = f :=
rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(p : Submodule R M₃) (h) :
(g.codRestrict p h).compMultilinearMap f =
(g.compMultilinearMap f).codRestrict p fun v => h (f v) :=
rfl
variable {ι₁ ι₂ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M') M₂) :
(g.compMultilinearMap f).domDomCongr σ = g.compMultilinearMap (f.domDomCongr σ) := by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr]
end LinearMap
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [(i : ι) → AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [(i : ι) → Module R (M₁ i)]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₂] [Module R M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] :
DistribMulAction S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.distribMulAction coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
section Module
variable [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : Module S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.module _ coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors S M₂] : NoZeroSMulDivisors S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.noZeroSMulDivisors _ rfl coe_smul
variable [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module S M₃] [Module R M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
variable (S) in
/-- `LinearMap.compMultilinearMap` as an `S`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.LinearMap.compMultilinearMapₗ [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g.compMultilinearMap
map_add' := g.compMultilinearMap_add
map_smul' := g.compMultilinearMap_smul
variable (R S M₁ M₂ M₃)
section OfSubsingleton
/-- Linear equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃`
and one-multilinear maps `MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃`. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def ofSubsingletonₗ [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ :=
{ ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i with
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
end OfSubsingleton
/-- The dependent version of `MultilinearMap.domDomCongrLinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv' {ι' : Type*} (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun i => M₁ (σ.symm i)) M₂ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ (σ.piCongrLeft' M₁).symm
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_smul] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ σ.piCongrLeft' M₁
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_smul] }
map_add' f₁ f₂ := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
left_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
right_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The space of constant maps is equivalent to the space of maps that are multilinear with respect
to an empty family. -/
@[simps]
def constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f := f 0
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := ext fun _ => MultilinearMap.congr_arg f <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv {ι₁ ι₂} (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ :=
{ (domDomCongrEquiv σ :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃) with
map_smul' := fun c f => by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr] }
end Module
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [Π i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [Π i, Module R (M₁' i)]
/-- Given a predicate `P`, one may associate to a multilinear map `f` a multilinear map
from the elements satisfying `P` to the multilinear maps on elements not satisfying `P`.
In other words, splitting the variables into two subsets one gets a multilinear map into
multilinear maps.
This is a linear map version of the function `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrict`. -/
def domDomRestrictₗ (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) => M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦ domDomRestrict f P z
map_update_add' := by
intro h m i x y
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
map_update_smul' := by
intro h m i c x
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
lemma iteratedFDeriv_aux {ι} {M₁ : ι → Type*} {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
(s : Set ι) [DecidableEq { x // x ∈ s }] (e : α ≃ s)
(m : α → ((i : ι) → M₁ i)) (a : α) (z : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
(fun i ↦ update m a z (e.symm i) i) =
(fun i ↦ update (fun j ↦ m (e.symm j) j) (e a) (z (e a)) i) := by
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne a (e.symm i) with rfl | hne
· rw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply e i, update_self, update_self]
· rw [update_of_ne hne.symm, update_of_ne fun h ↦ (Equiv.symm_apply_apply .. ▸ h ▸ hne) rfl]
/-- One of the components of the iterated derivative of a multilinear map. Given a bijection `e`
between a type `α` (typically `Fin k`) and a subset `s` of `ι`, this component is a multilinear map
of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ`, mapping them to `f (x₁, (v_{e.symm 2})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at
indices `i` in `s` one uses the `i`-th coordinate of the vector `v_{e.symm i}` and otherwise one
uses the `i`-th coordinate of a reference vector `x`.
This is multilinear in the components of `x` outside of `s`, and in the `v_j`. -/
noncomputable def iteratedFDerivComponent {α : Type*}
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {s : Set ι} (e : α ≃ s) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // a ∉ s}) ↦ M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : α) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦
{ toFun := fun v ↦ domDomRestrictₗ f (fun i ↦ i ∈ s) z (fun i ↦ v (e.symm i) i)
map_update_add' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux]
map_update_smul' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux] }
map_update_add' := by intros; ext; simp
map_update_smul' := by intros; ext; simp
open Classical in
/-- The `k`-th iterated derivative of a multilinear map `f` at the point `x`. It is a multilinear
map of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ` (with the same type as `x`), mapping them
to `∑ f (x₁, (v_{i₁})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at each index `j` one uses either `xⱼ` or one
of the `(vᵢ)ⱼ`, and each `vᵢ` has to be used exactly once.
The sum is parameterized by the embeddings of `Fin k` in the index type `ι` (or, equivalently,
by the subsets `s` of `ι` of cardinality `k` and then the bijections between `Fin k` and `s`).
For the continuous version, see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv`. -/
protected noncomputable def iteratedFDeriv [Fintype ι]
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (k : ℕ) (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : Fin k) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂ :=
∑ e : Fin k ↪ ι, iteratedFDerivComponent f e.toEquivRange (fun i ↦ x i)
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapₗ (f : Π (i : ι), M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := fun g ↦ g.compLinearMap f
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g` and multilinear in
`f₁, ..., fₙ`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapMultilinear :
@MultilinearMap R ι (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
((MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) _ _ _
(fun _ ↦ LinearMap.module) _ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.compLinearMapₗ
map_update_add' := by
intro _ f i f₁ f₂
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (f₁ + f₂) j <| x j) =
(g fun j ↦ update f i f₁ j <|x j) + g fun j ↦ update f i f₂ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_add (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i (f₁ (x i)) (f₂ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (f₁ + f₂) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₁ j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₂ j
map_update_smul' := by
intro _ f i a f₀
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (a • f₀) j <| x j) = a • g fun j ↦ update f i f₀ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_smul (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i a (f₀ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (a • f₀) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₀ j
/--
Let `M₁ᵢ` and `M₁ᵢ'` be two families of `R`-modules and `M₂` an `R`-module.
Let us denote `Π i, M₁ᵢ` and `Π i, M₁ᵢ'` by `M` and `M'` respectively.
If `g` is a multilinear map `M' → M₂`, then `g` can be reinterpreted as a multilinear
map from `Π i, M₁ᵢ ⟶ M₁ᵢ'` to `M ⟶ M₂` via `(fᵢ) ↦ v ↦ g(fᵢ vᵢ)`.
-/
@[simps!] def piLinearMap :
MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ →ₗ[R]
MultilinearMap R (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) where
toFun g := (LinearMap.applyₗ g).compMultilinearMap compLinearMapMultilinear
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
end
/-- If one multiplies by `c i` the coordinates in a finset `s`, then the image under a multilinear
map is multiplied by `∏ i ∈ s, c i`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when
`s = univ`, given in `map_smul_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not
require the index set `ι` to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_smul [DecidableEq ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) = (∏ i ∈ s, c i) • f m := by
refine s.induction_on (by simp) ?_
intro j s j_not_mem_s Hrec
have A :
Function.update (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) j (m j) =
s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· rw [h]
simp [j_not_mem_s]
· simp [h]
rw [s.piecewise_insert, f.map_update_smul, A, Hrec]
simp [j_not_mem_s, mul_smul]
/-- Multiplicativity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
theorem map_smul_univ [Fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(f fun i => c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m := by
classical simpa using map_piecewise_smul f c m Finset.univ
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul_left [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update (c • m) i x) = c ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) • f (update m i x) := by
have :
f ((Finset.univ.erase i).piecewise (c • update m i x) (update m i x)) =
(∏ _i ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, c) • f (update m i x) :=
map_piecewise_smul f _ _ _
simpa [← Function.update_smul c m] using this
section
variable (R ι)
variable (A : Type*) [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Fintype ι]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebra` is the multilinear map on `A^ι` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin` for a version that works with a non-commutative
algebra `A` but requires `ι = Fin n`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebra : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => A) A where
toFun m := ∏ i, m i
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem, add_mul]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem]
variable {R A ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebra_apply (m : ι → A) : MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end
section
variable (R n)
variable (A : Type*) [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebraFin` is the multilinear map on `A^n` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra` for a version that assumes `[CommSemiring A]` but works
for `A^ι` with any finite type `ι`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebraFin : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => A) A :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun m ↦ (List.ofFn m).prod)
(fun m i x y ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, add_mul, this,
mul_add, add_mul])
(fun m i c x ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, this])
variable {R A n}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply (m : Fin n → A) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A m = (List.ofFn m).prod :=
rfl
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply_const (a : A) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A fun _ => a) = a ^ n := by simp
end
/-- Given an `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smulRight z` is the map
sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
def smulRight (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ :=
(LinearMap.smulRight LinearMap.id z).compMultilinearMap f
@[simp]
theorem smulRight_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f.smulRight z m = f m • z :=
rfl
variable (R ι)
/-- The canonical multilinear map on `R^ι` when `ι` is finite, associating to `m` the product of
all the `m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module). See also
`mkPiAlgebra` for a more general version. -/
protected def mkPiRing [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂ :=
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R).smulRight z
variable {R ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiRing_apply [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) (m : ι → R) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z : (ι → R) → M₂) m = (∏ i, m i) • z :=
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (f fun _ => 1) = f := by
ext m
have : m = fun i => m i • (1 : R) := by
ext j
simp
conv_rhs => rw [this, f.map_smul_univ]
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_eq_iff [Fintype ι] {z₁ z₂ : M₂} :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₁ = MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₂ ↔ z₁ = z₂ := by
simp_rw [MultilinearMap.ext_iff, mkPiRing_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using h fun _ => 1
· intro x
simp [h]
theorem mkPiRing_zero [Fintype ι] : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (0 : M₂) = 0 := by
ext; rw [mkPiRing_apply, smul_zero, MultilinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem mkPiRing_eq_zero_iff [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
rw [← mkPiRing_zero, mkPiRing_eq_iff]
end CommSemiring
section RangeAddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : Neg (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun m => -f m, fun m i x y => by simp [add_comm], fun m i c x => by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (-f) m = -f m :=
rfl
instance : Sub (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨fun m => f m - g m, fun m i x y => by
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
abel,
fun m i c x => by simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul, smul_sub]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f - g) m = f m - g m :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
{ MultilinearMap.addCommMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
sub_eq_add_neg := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => sub_eq_add_neg _ _
zsmul := fun n f =>
{ toFun := fun m => n • f m
map_update_add' := fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add]
map_update_smul' := fun l i x d => by simp [← smul_comm x n (_ : M₂)] }
zsmul_zero' := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_zero' _
zsmul_succ' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_succ' _ _
zsmul_neg' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_neg' _ _ }
end RangeAddCommGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_update_neg [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (-x)) = -f (update m i x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by
rw [← MultilinearMap.map_update_add, neg_add_cancel, f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_neg := MultilinearMap.map_update_neg
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, MultilinearMap.map_update_add, map_update_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_sub := MultilinearMap.map_update_sub
lemma map_update [DecidableEq ι] (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (i : ι) (v : M₁ i) :
f (update x i v) = f x - f (update x i (x i - v)) := by
rw [map_update_sub, update_eq_self, sub_sub_cancel]
open Finset in
lemma map_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f a - f (s.piecewise b a) =
∑ i ∈ s, f (fun j ↦ if j ∈ s → j < i then a j else if i = j then a j - b j else b j) := by
refine s.induction_on_min ?_ fun k s hk ih ↦ ?_
· rw [Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_empty, sub_self]
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert, map_update, ← sub_add, ih,
add_comm, sum_insert (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
simp_rw [s.mem_insert]
congr 1
· congr; ext i; split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [update_of_ne, Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
· exact fun h ↦ (hk i h).not_lt (h₁ <| .inr h)
· exact fun h ↦ (h₁ <| .inl h).ne h
· cases h₂
rw [update_self, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
· push_neg at h₁
rw [update_of_ne (Ne.symm h₂), s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ (h₁.1.resolve_left <| Ne.symm h₂)]
· apply sum_congr rfl; intro i hi; congr; ext j; congr 1; apply propext
simp_rw [imp_iff_not_or, not_or]; apply or_congr_left'
intro h; rw [and_iff_right]; rintro rfl; exact h (hk i hi)
/-- This calculates the differences between the values of a multilinear map at
two arguments that differ on a finset `s` of `ι`. It requires a
linear order on `ι` in order to express the result. -/
lemma map_piecewise_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b v : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise a v) - f (s.piecewise b v) = ∑ i ∈ s, f
fun j ↦ if j ∈ s then if j < i then a j else if j = i then a j - b j else b j else v j := by
rw [← s.piecewise_idem_right b a, map_sub_map_piecewise]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg f <| funext fun j ↦ ?_
by_cases hjs : j ∈ s
· rw [if_pos hjs]; by_cases hji : j < i
· rw [if_pos fun _ ↦ hji, if_pos hji, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hjs]
rw [if_neg (Classical.not_imp.mpr ⟨hjs, hji⟩), if_neg hji]
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [if_pos rfl, if_pos rfl, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hi]
· rw [if_neg hij, if_neg hij.symm]
· rw [if_neg hjs, if_pos fun h ↦ (hjs h).elim, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ hjs]
open Finset in
lemma map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) = f x + f.linearDeriv x h + ∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, f (s.piecewise h x) := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_univ, ← Finset.powerset_univ,
← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not _ (2 ≤ #·)]
simp_rw [not_le, Nat.lt_succ, le_iff_lt_or_eq (b := 1), Nat.lt_one_iff, filter_or,
← powersetCard_eq_filter, sum_union (univ.pairwise_disjoint_powersetCard zero_ne_one),
powersetCard_zero, powersetCard_one, sum_singleton, Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_map,
Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Finset.piecewise_singleton, linearDeriv_apply, add_comm]
open Finset in
/-- This expresses the difference between the values of a multilinear map
at two points "close to `x`" in terms of the "derivative" of the multilinear map at `x`
and of "second-order" terms. -/
lemma map_add_sub_map_add_sub_linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h h' : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) - f (x + h') - f.linearDeriv x (h - h') =
∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, (f (s.piecewise h x) - f (s.piecewise h' x)) := by
simp_rw [map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, sub_self, zero_add,
← LinearMap.map_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, sum_sub_distrib]
end AddCommGroup
|
section CommSemiring
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 1,346 | 1,348 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.BoundedLattice
/-!
# Heyting algebra morphisms
A Heyting homomorphism between two Heyting algebras is a bounded lattice homomorphism that preserves
Heyting implication.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `HeytingHom`: Heyting homomorphisms.
* `CoheytingHom`: Co-Heyting homomorphisms.
* `BiheytingHom`: Bi-Heyting homomorphisms.
## Typeclasses
* `HeytingHomClass`
* `CoheytingHomClass`
* `BiheytingHomClass`
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of Heyting homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. Bounded lattice homomorphisms that preserve
Heyting implication. -/
structure HeytingHom (α β : Type*) [HeytingAlgebra α] [HeytingAlgebra β] extends
LatticeHom α β where
/-- The proposition that a Heyting homomorphism preserves the bottom element. -/
protected map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
/-- The proposition that a Heyting homomorphism preserves the Heyting implication. -/
protected map_himp' : ∀ a b, toFun (a ⇨ b) = toFun a ⇨ toFun b
/-- The type of co-Heyting homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. Bounded lattice homomorphisms that
preserve difference. -/
structure CoheytingHom (α β : Type*) [CoheytingAlgebra α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] extends
LatticeHom α β where
/-- The proposition that a co-Heyting homomorphism preserves the top element. -/
protected map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
/-- The proposition that a co-Heyting homomorphism preserves the difference operation. -/
protected map_sdiff' : ∀ a b, toFun (a \ b) = toFun a \ toFun b
/-- The type of bi-Heyting homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. Bounded lattice homomorphisms that
preserve Heyting implication and difference. -/
structure BiheytingHom (α β : Type*) [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] extends
LatticeHom α β where
/-- The proposition that a bi-Heyting homomorphism preserves the Heyting implication. -/
protected map_himp' : ∀ a b, toFun (a ⇨ b) = toFun a ⇨ toFun b
/-- The proposition that a bi-Heyting homomorphism preserves the difference operation. -/
protected map_sdiff' : ∀ a b, toFun (a \ b) = toFun a \ toFun b
/-- `HeytingHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of Heyting homomorphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `HeytingHom`. -/
class HeytingHomClass (F α β : Type*) [HeytingAlgebra α] [HeytingAlgebra β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends LatticeHomClass F α β where
/-- The proposition that a Heyting homomorphism preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
/-- The proposition that a Heyting homomorphism preserves the Heyting implication. -/
map_himp (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b
/-- `CoheytingHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of co-Heyting homomorphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `CoheytingHom`. -/
class CoheytingHomClass (F α β : Type*) [CoheytingAlgebra α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop
extends LatticeHomClass F α β where
/-- The proposition that a co-Heyting homomorphism preserves the top element. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
/-- The proposition that a co-Heyting homomorphism preserves the difference operation. -/
map_sdiff (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b
/-- `BiheytingHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of bi-Heyting homomorphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `BiheytingHom`. -/
class BiheytingHomClass (F α β : Type*) [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop
extends LatticeHomClass F α β where
/-- The proposition that a bi-Heyting homomorphism preserves the Heyting implication. -/
map_himp (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b
/-- The proposition that a bi-Heyting homomorphism preserves the difference operation. -/
map_sdiff (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b
export HeytingHomClass (map_himp)
export CoheytingHomClass (map_sdiff)
attribute [simp] map_himp map_sdiff
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-! This section passes in some instances implicitly. See note [implicit instance arguments] -/
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingHomClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass [HeytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : HeytingAlgebra β} [HeytingHomClass F α β] : BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹HeytingHomClass F α β› with
map_top := fun f => by rw [← @himp_self α _ ⊥, ← himp_self, map_himp] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingHomClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass [CoheytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : CoheytingAlgebra β} [CoheytingHomClass F α β] : BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹CoheytingHomClass F α β› with
map_bot := fun f => by rw [← @sdiff_self α _ ⊤, ← sdiff_self, map_sdiff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingHomClass.toHeytingHomClass [BiheytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : BiheytingAlgebra β} [BiheytingHomClass F α β] : HeytingHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BiheytingHomClass F α β› with
map_bot := fun f => by rw [← @sdiff_self α _ ⊤, ← sdiff_self, BiheytingHomClass.map_sdiff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingHomClass.toCoheytingHomClass [BiheytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : BiheytingAlgebra β} [BiheytingHomClass F α β] : CoheytingHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BiheytingHomClass F α β› with
map_top := fun f => by rw [← @himp_self α _ ⊥, ← himp_self, map_himp] }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toHeytingHomClass [HeytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : HeytingAlgebra β} [OrderIsoClass F α β] : HeytingHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass with
map_himp := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by
simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_himp_iff]
rw [← OrderIsoClass.map_le_map_iff f]
simp }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toCoheytingHomClass [CoheytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : CoheytingAlgebra β} [OrderIsoClass F α β] : CoheytingHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass with
map_sdiff := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by
simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
rw [← OrderIsoClass.map_le_map_iff f]
simp }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toBiheytingHomClass [BiheytingAlgebra α]
{ _ : BiheytingAlgebra β} [OrderIsoClass F α β] : BiheytingHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass with
map_himp := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by
simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_himp_iff]
rw [← OrderIsoClass.map_le_map_iff f]
simp
map_sdiff := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by
simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
rw [← OrderIsoClass.map_le_map_iff f]
simp }
end Equiv
variable [FunLike F α β]
instance BoundedLatticeHomClass.toBiheytingHomClass [BooleanAlgebra α] [BooleanAlgebra β]
[BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β] : BiheytingHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β› with
map_himp := fun f a b => by rw [himp_eq, himp_eq, map_sup, (isCompl_compl.map _).compl_eq]
map_sdiff := fun f a b => by rw [sdiff_eq, sdiff_eq, map_inf, (isCompl_compl.map _).compl_eq] }
section HeytingAlgebra
open scoped symmDiff
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] [HeytingAlgebra β] [HeytingHomClass F α β] (f : F)
@[simp]
theorem map_compl (a : α) : f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, ← himp_bot, map_himp, map_bot]
@[simp]
theorem map_bihimp (a b : α) : f (a ⇔ b) = f a ⇔ f b := by simp_rw [bihimp, map_inf, map_himp]
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
open scoped symmDiff
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] [CoheytingHomClass F α β] (f : F)
@[simp]
theorem map_hnot (a : α) : f (￢a) = ￢f a := by rw [← top_sdiff', ← top_sdiff', map_sdiff, map_top]
@[simp]
theorem map_symmDiff (a b : α) : f (a ∆ b) = f a ∆ f b := by simp_rw [symmDiff, map_sup, map_sdiff]
end CoheytingAlgebra
instance [HeytingAlgebra α] [HeytingAlgebra β] [HeytingHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (HeytingHom α β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_sup' := map_sup f
map_inf' := map_inf f
map_bot' := map_bot f
map_himp' := map_himp f }⟩
instance [CoheytingAlgebra α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] [CoheytingHomClass F α β] :
CoeTC F (CoheytingHom α β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_sup' := map_sup f
map_inf' := map_inf f
map_top' := map_top f
map_sdiff' := map_sdiff f }⟩
instance [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] [BiheytingHomClass F α β] :
CoeTC F (BiheytingHom α β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_sup' := map_sup f
map_inf' := map_inf f
map_himp' := map_himp f
map_sdiff' := map_sdiff f }⟩
namespace HeytingHom
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] [HeytingAlgebra β] [HeytingAlgebra γ] [HeytingAlgebra δ]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (HeytingHom α β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr
instance instHeytingHomClass : HeytingHomClass (HeytingHom α β) α β where
map_sup f := f.map_sup'
map_inf f := f.map_inf'
map_bot f := f.map_bot'
map_himp := HeytingHom.map_himp'
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : HeytingHom α β} : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe_aux {f : HeytingHom α β} : (↑f.toLatticeHom) = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : HeytingHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `HeytingHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : HeytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : HeytingHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sup' := by simpa only [h] using map_sup f
map_inf' := by simpa only [h] using map_inf f
map_bot' := by simpa only [h] using map_bot f
map_himp' := by simpa only [h] using map_himp f
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : HeytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : HeytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `HeytingHom`. -/
protected def id : HeytingHom α α :=
{ BotHom.id _ with
toLatticeHom := LatticeHom.id _
map_himp' := fun _ _ => rfl }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(HeytingHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : HeytingHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (HeytingHom α α) :=
⟨HeytingHom.id _⟩
instance : PartialOrder (HeytingHom α β) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
/-- Composition of `HeytingHom`s as a `HeytingHom`. -/
def comp (f : HeytingHom β γ) (g : HeytingHom α β) : HeytingHom α γ :=
{ f.toLatticeHom.comp g.toLatticeHom with
toFun := f ∘ g
map_bot' := by simp
map_himp' := fun a b => by simp }
variable {f f₁ f₂ : HeytingHom α β} {g g₁ g₂ : HeytingHom β γ}
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : HeytingHom β γ) (g : HeytingHom α β) : ⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : HeytingHom β γ) (g : HeytingHom α β) (a : α) : f.comp g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : HeytingHom γ δ) (g : HeytingHom β γ) (h : HeytingHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : HeytingHom α β) : f.comp (HeytingHom.id α) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : HeytingHom α β) : (HeytingHom.id β).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right (hf : Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg (fun a ↦ comp a f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left (hg : Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => HeytingHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end HeytingHom
namespace CoheytingHom
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] [CoheytingAlgebra γ] [CoheytingAlgebra δ]
instance : FunLike (CoheytingHom α β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr
instance : CoheytingHomClass (CoheytingHom α β) α β where
map_sup f := f.map_sup'
map_inf f := f.map_inf'
map_top f := f.map_top'
map_sdiff := CoheytingHom.map_sdiff'
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : CoheytingHom α β} : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe_aux {f : CoheytingHom α β} : (↑f.toLatticeHom) = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CoheytingHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `CoheytingHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : CoheytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : CoheytingHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sup' := by simpa only [h] using map_sup f
map_inf' := by simpa only [h] using map_inf f
map_top' := by simpa only [h] using map_top f
map_sdiff' := by simpa only [h] using map_sdiff f
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : CoheytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : CoheytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `CoheytingHom`. -/
protected def id : CoheytingHom α α :=
{ TopHom.id _ with
toLatticeHom := LatticeHom.id _
map_sdiff' := fun _ _ => rfl }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(CoheytingHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : CoheytingHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (CoheytingHom α α) :=
⟨CoheytingHom.id _⟩
instance : PartialOrder (CoheytingHom α β) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
/-- Composition of `CoheytingHom`s as a `CoheytingHom`. -/
def comp (f : CoheytingHom β γ) (g : CoheytingHom α β) : CoheytingHom α γ :=
{ f.toLatticeHom.comp g.toLatticeHom with
toFun := f ∘ g
map_top' := by simp
map_sdiff' := fun a b => by simp }
variable {f f₁ f₂ : CoheytingHom α β} {g g₁ g₂ : CoheytingHom β γ}
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : CoheytingHom β γ) (g : CoheytingHom α β) : ⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : CoheytingHom β γ) (g : CoheytingHom α β) (a : α) : f.comp g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : CoheytingHom γ δ) (g : CoheytingHom β γ) (h : CoheytingHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : CoheytingHom α β) : f.comp (CoheytingHom.id α) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : CoheytingHom α β) : (CoheytingHom.id β).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right (hf : Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg (fun a ↦ comp a f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left (hg : Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => CoheytingHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end CoheytingHom
namespace BiheytingHom
variable [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] [BiheytingAlgebra γ] [BiheytingAlgebra δ]
instance : FunLike (BiheytingHom α β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr
instance : BiheytingHomClass (BiheytingHom α β) α β where
map_sup f := f.map_sup'
map_inf f := f.map_inf'
map_himp f := f.map_himp'
map_sdiff f := f.map_sdiff'
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : BiheytingHom α β} : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe_aux {f : BiheytingHom α β} : (↑f.toLatticeHom) = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : BiheytingHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `BiheytingHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : BiheytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : BiheytingHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sup' := by simpa only [h] using map_sup f
map_inf' := by simpa only [h] using map_inf f
map_himp' := by simpa only [h] using map_himp f
map_sdiff' := by simpa only [h] using map_sdiff f
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : BiheytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : BiheytingHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `BiheytingHom`. -/
protected def id : BiheytingHom α α :=
{ HeytingHom.id _, CoheytingHom.id _ with toLatticeHom := LatticeHom.id _ }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(BiheytingHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : BiheytingHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (BiheytingHom α α) :=
⟨BiheytingHom.id _⟩
instance : PartialOrder (BiheytingHom α β) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
/-- Composition of `BiheytingHom`s as a `BiheytingHom`. -/
def comp (f : BiheytingHom β γ) (g : BiheytingHom α β) : BiheytingHom α γ :=
{ f.toLatticeHom.comp g.toLatticeHom with
toFun := f ∘ g
map_himp' := fun a b => by simp
map_sdiff' := fun a b => by simp }
variable {f f₁ f₂ : BiheytingHom α β} {g g₁ g₂ : BiheytingHom β γ}
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : BiheytingHom β γ) (g : BiheytingHom α β) : ⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : BiheytingHom β γ) (g : BiheytingHom α β) (a : α) : f.comp g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : BiheytingHom γ δ) (g : BiheytingHom β γ) (h : BiheytingHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : BiheytingHom α β) : f.comp (BiheytingHom.id α) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : BiheytingHom α β) : (BiheytingHom.id β).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right (hf : Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg (fun a ↦ comp a f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left (hg : Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => BiheytingHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end BiheytingHom
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Hom.lean | 621 | 622 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Holder
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.MetricSeparated
/-!
# Hausdorff measure and metric (outer) measures
In this file we define the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure on an (extended) metric space `X` and
the Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (extended) metric space. Let `μ d δ` be the maximal outer
measure such that `μ d δ s ≤ (EMetric.diam s) ^ d` for every set of diameter less than `δ`. Then
the Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` of `s` is defined as `⨆ δ > 0, μ d δ s`. By Caratheodory theorem
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`, this is a Borel measure on `X`.
The value of `μH[d]`, `d > 0`, on a set `s` (measurable or not) is given by
```
μH[d] s = ⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : 0 < r), ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n)
(ht : ∀ n, EMetric.diam (t n) ≤ r), ∑' n, EMetric.diam (t n) ^ d
```
For every set `s` for any `d < d'` we have either `μH[d] s = ∞` or `μH[d'] s = 0`, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top`. In
`Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDimension` we use this fact to define the Hausdorff dimension
`dimH` of a set in an (extended) metric space.
We also define two generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. In one generalization (see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) we take any function `m (diam s)` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. In
an even more general definition (see `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'`) we use any function
of `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`. Some authors start with a partial function `m` defined only on some sets
`s : Set X` (e.g., only on balls or only on measurable sets). This is equivalent to our definition
applied to `MeasureTheory.extend m`.
We also define a predicate `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric` which says that an outer measure
is additive on metric separated pairs of sets: `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` provided that
`⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), edist x y ≠ 0`. This is the property required for the Caratheodory theorem
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`, so we prove this theorem for any
metric outer measure, then prove that outer measures constructed using `mkMetric'` are metric outer
measures.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric`: an outer measure `μ` is called *metric* if
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` for any two metric separated sets `s` and `t`. A metric outer measure in a
Borel extended metric space is guaranteed to satisfy the Caratheodory condition, see
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`.
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` and its particular case
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric`: a construction of an outer measure that is guaranteed to
be metric. Both constructions are generalizations of the Hausdorff measure. The same measures
interpreted as Borel measures are called `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'` and
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure` a.k.a. `μH[d]`: the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
There are many definitions of the Hausdorff measure that differ from each other by a
multiplicative constant. We put
`μH[d] s = ⨆ r > 0, ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (hts : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (ht : ∀ n, EMetric.diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ (ht : ¬Set.Subsingleton (t n)), (EMetric.diam (t n)) ^ d`,
see `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_apply`. In the most interesting case `0 < d` one
can omit the `⨆ (ht : ¬Set.Subsingleton (t n))` part.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsMetric.borel_le_caratheodory`: if `μ` is a metric outer measure
on an extended metric space `X` (that is, it is additive on pairs of metric separated sets), then
every Borel set is Caratheodory measurable (hence, `μ` defines an actual
`MeasureTheory.Measure`). See also `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_mono`: `μH[d] s` is an antitone function
of `d`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top`: if `d₁ < d₂`, then for any `s`, either
`μH[d₂] s = 0` or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. Together with the previous lemma, this means that `μH[d] s` is
equal to infinity on some ray `(-∞, D)` and is equal to zero on `(D, +∞)`, where `D` is a possibly
infinite number called the *Hausdorff dimension* of `s`; `μH[D] s` can be zero, infinity, or
anything in between.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.noAtoms_hausdorff`: Hausdorff measure has no atoms.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `MeasureTheory.hausdorffMeasure_pi_real`: for a nonempty `ι`, `μH[card ι]` on `ι → ℝ` equals
Lebesgue measure.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `MeasureTheory`.
- `μH[d]` : `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d`
## Implementation notes
There are a few similar constructions called the `d`-dimensional Hausdorff measure. E.g., some
sources only allow coverings by balls and use `r ^ d` instead of `(diam s) ^ d`. While these
construction lead to different Hausdorff measures, they lead to the same notion of the Hausdorff
dimension.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.10][Federer1996]
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, measure, metric measure
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open EMetric Set Function Filter Encodable Module TopologicalSpace
noncomputable section
variable {ι X Y : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] [EMetricSpace Y]
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
/-!
### Metric outer measures
In this section we define metric outer measures and prove Caratheodory theorem: a metric outer
measure has the Caratheodory property.
-/
/-- We say that an outer measure `μ` in an (e)metric space is *metric* if `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`
for any two metric separated sets `s`, `t`. -/
def IsMetric (μ : OuterMeasure X) : Prop :=
∀ s t : Set X, Metric.AreSeparated s t → μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t
namespace IsMetric
variable {μ : OuterMeasure X}
/-- A metric outer measure is additive on a finite set of pairwise metric separated sets. -/
theorem finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated (hm : IsMetric μ) {I : Finset ι} {s : ι → Set X}
(hI : ∀ i ∈ I, ∀ j ∈ I, i ≠ j → Metric.AreSeparated (s i) (s j)) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = ∑ i ∈ I, μ (s i) := by
classical
induction I using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i I hiI ihI =>
simp only [Finset.mem_insert] at hI
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_insert, hm, ihI, Finset.sum_insert hiI]
exacts [fun i hi j hj hij => hI i (Or.inr hi) j (Or.inr hj) hij,
Metric.AreSeparated.finset_iUnion_right fun j hj =>
hI i (Or.inl rfl) j (Or.inr hj) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hiI).symm]
/-- Caratheodory theorem. If `m` is a metric outer measure, then every Borel measurable set `t` is
Caratheodory measurable: for any (not necessarily measurable) set `s` we have
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s`. -/
theorem borel_le_caratheodory (hm : IsMetric μ) : borel X ≤ μ.caratheodory := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_isClosed]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => μ.isCaratheodory_iff_le.2 fun s => ?_
set S : ℕ → Set X := fun n => {x ∈ s | (↑n)⁻¹ ≤ infEdist x t}
have Ssep (n) : Metric.AreSeparated (S n) t :=
⟨n⁻¹, ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _),
fun x hx y hy ↦ hx.2.trans <| infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy⟩
have Ssep' : ∀ n, Metric.AreSeparated (S n) (s ∩ t) := fun n =>
(Ssep n).mono Subset.rfl inter_subset_right
have S_sub : ∀ n, S n ⊆ s \ t := fun n =>
subset_inter inter_subset_left (Ssep n).subset_compl_right
have hSs : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s := fun n =>
calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) = μ (s ∩ t ∪ S n) := Eq.symm <| hm _ _ <| (Ssep' n).symm
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t ∪ s \ t) := μ.mono <| union_subset_union_right _ <| S_sub n
_ = μ s := by rw [inter_union_diff]
have iUnion_S : ⋃ n, S n = s \ t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (iUnion_subset S_sub) ?_
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht] at hxt
rcases ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt hxt with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, hxs, hn.le⟩
/- Now we have `∀ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) ≤ μ s` and we need to prove
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ s`. We can't pass to the limit because
`μ` is only an outer measure. -/
by_cases htop : μ (s \ t) = ∞
· rw [htop, add_top, ← htop]
exact μ.mono diff_subset
suffices μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ ⨆ n, μ (S n) by calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∩ t) + μ (⋃ n, S n) := by rw [iUnion_S]
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + ⨆ n, μ (S n) := by gcongr
_ = ⨆ n, μ (s ∩ t) + μ (S n) := ENNReal.add_iSup ..
_ ≤ μ s := iSup_le hSs
/- It suffices to show that `∑' k, μ (S (k + 1) \ S k) ≠ ∞`. Indeed, if we have this,
then for all `N` we have `μ (⋃ n, S n) ≤ μ (S N) + ∑' k, m (S (N + k + 1) \ S (N + k))`
and the second term tends to zero, see `OuterMeasure.iUnion_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top`
for details. -/
have : ∀ n, S n ⊆ S (n + 1) := fun n x hx =>
⟨hx.1, le_trans (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.2 <| Nat.cast_le.2 n.le_succ) hx.2⟩
refine (μ.iUnion_nat_of_monotone_of_tsum_ne_top this ?_).le; clear this
/- While the sets `S (k + 1) \ S k` are not pairwise metric separated, the sets in each
subsequence `S (2 * k + 1) \ S (2 * k)` and `S (2 * k + 2) \ S (2 * k)` are metric separated,
so `m` is additive on each of those sequences. -/
rw [← tsum_even_add_odd ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable, ENNReal.add_ne_top]
suffices ∀ a, (∑' k : ℕ, μ (S (2 * k + 1 + a) \ S (2 * k + a))) ≠ ∞ from
⟨by simpa using this 0, by simpa using this 1⟩
refine fun r => ne_top_of_le_ne_top htop ?_
rw [← iUnion_S, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_le_iff]
intro n
rw [← hm.finset_iUnion_of_pairwise_separated]
· exact μ.mono (iUnion_subset fun i => iUnion_subset fun _ x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨_, hx.1⟩)
suffices ∀ i j, i < j → Metric.AreSeparated (S (2 * i + 1 + r)) (s \ S (2 * j + r)) from
fun i _ j _ hij => hij.lt_or_lt.elim
(fun h => (this i j h).mono inter_subset_left fun x hx => by exact ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩)
fun h => (this j i h).symm.mono (fun x hx => by exact ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩) inter_subset_left
intro i j hj
have A : ((↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ := by
rw [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, Nat.cast_lt]; omega
refine ⟨(↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ - (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹, by simpa [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le] using A,
fun x hx y hy => ?_⟩
have : infEdist y t < (↑(2 * j + r))⁻¹ := not_le.1 fun hle => hy.2 ⟨hy.1, hle⟩
rcases infEdist_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨z, hzt, hyz⟩
have hxz : (↑(2 * i + 1 + r))⁻¹ ≤ edist x z := le_infEdist.1 hx.2 _ hzt
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right hyz.ne_top
refine le_trans ?_ (edist_triangle _ _ _)
refine (add_le_add le_rfl hyz.le).trans (Eq.trans_le ?_ hxz)
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le A.le]
theorem le_caratheodory [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (hm : IsMetric μ) :
‹MeasurableSpace X› ≤ μ.caratheodory := by
rw [BorelSpace.measurable_eq (α := X)]
exact hm.borel_le_caratheodory
end IsMetric
/-!
### Constructors of metric outer measures
In this section we provide constructors `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` and
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric` and prove that these outer measures are metric outer
measures. We also prove basic lemmas about `map`/`comap` of these measures.
-/
/-- Auxiliary definition for `OuterMeasure.mkMetric'`: given a function on sets
`m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, returns the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for any set `s` of diameter at most `r`. -/
def mkMetric'.pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
boundedBy <| extend fun s (_ : diam s ≤ r) => m s
/-- Given a function `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric' m` is the supremum of `mkMetric'.pre m r`
over `r > 0`. Equivalently, it is the limit of `mkMetric'.pre m r` as `r` tends to zero from
the right. -/
def mkMetric' (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
⨆ r > 0, mkMetric'.pre m r
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞` and `r > 0`, let `μ r` be the maximal outer measure such that
`μ s ≤ m (EMetric.diam s)` whenever `EMetric.diam s < r`. Then `mkMetric m = ⨆ r > 0, μ r`. -/
def mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X :=
mkMetric' fun s => m (diam s)
namespace mkMetric'
variable {m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {μ : OuterMeasure X} {s : Set X}
theorem le_pre : μ ≤ pre m r ↔ ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m s := by
simp only [pre, le_boundedBy, extend, le_iInf_iff]
theorem pre_le (hs : diam s ≤ r) : pre m r s ≤ m s :=
(boundedBy_le _).trans <| iInf_le _ hs
theorem mono_pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r ≤ r') : pre m r' ≤ pre m r :=
le_pre.2 fun _ hs => pre_le (hs.trans h)
theorem mono_pre_nat (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : Monotone fun k : ℕ => pre m k⁻¹ :=
fun k l h => le_pre.2 fun _ hs => pre_le (hs.trans <| by simpa)
theorem tendsto_pre (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set X) :
Tendsto (fun r => pre m r s) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 <| mkMetric' m s) := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]
simp only [mkMetric', OuterMeasure.iSup_apply, iSup_subtype']
exact tendsto_atBot_iSup fun r r' hr => mono_pre _ hr _
theorem tendsto_pre_nat (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set X) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => pre m n⁻¹ s) atTop (𝓝 <| mkMetric' m s) := by
refine (tendsto_pre m s).comp (tendsto_inf.2 ⟨ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero, ?_⟩)
refine tendsto_principal.2 (Eventually.of_forall fun n => ?_)
simp
theorem eq_iSup_nat (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : mkMetric' m = ⨆ n : ℕ, mkMetric'.pre m n⁻¹ := by
ext1 s
rw [iSup_apply]
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre_nat m s)
(tendsto_atTop_iSup fun k l hkl => mkMetric'.mono_pre_nat m hkl s)
/-- `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre m r` is a trimmed measure provided that
`m (closure s) = m s` for any set `s`. -/
theorem trim_pre [MeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞)
(hcl : ∀ s, m (closure s) = m s) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : (pre m r).trim = pre m r := by
refine le_antisymm (le_pre.2 fun s hs => ?_) (le_trim _)
rw [trim_eq_iInf]
refine iInf_le_of_le (closure s) <| iInf_le_of_le subset_closure <|
iInf_le_of_le measurableSet_closure ((pre_le ?_).trans_eq (hcl _))
rwa [diam_closure]
end mkMetric'
/-- An outer measure constructed using `OuterMeasure.mkMetric'` is a metric outer measure. -/
theorem mkMetric'_isMetric (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : (mkMetric' m).IsMetric := by
rintro s t ⟨r, r0, hr⟩
refine tendsto_nhds_unique_of_eventuallyEq
(mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ _) ((mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ _).add (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ _)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at r0
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT r0]
rintro ε ⟨_, εr⟩
refine boundedBy_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter ?_
rintro u ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hyt, hyu⟩
have : ε < diam u := εr.trans_le ((hr x hxs y hyt).trans <| edist_le_diam_of_mem hxu hyu)
exact iInf_eq_top.2 fun h => (this.not_le h).elim
/-- If `c ∉ {0, ∞}` and `m₁ d ≤ c * m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0`
(we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then `mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono_smul {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h0 : c ≠ 0)
(hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] c • m₂) : (mkMetric m₁ : OuterMeasure X) ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ := by
classical
rcases (mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset' zero_lt_one).1 hle with ⟨r, hr0, hr⟩
refine fun s =>
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ s)
(ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul (mkMetric'.tendsto_pre _ s) (Or.inr hc))
(mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hr0) fun r' hr' => ?_)
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mkMetric'.pre, RingHom.id_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_apply, smul_boundedBy hc]
refine le_boundedBy.2 (fun t => (boundedBy_le _).trans ?_) _
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply, extend, iInf_eq_if]
split_ifs with ht
· apply hr
exact ⟨zero_le _, ht.trans_lt hr'.2⟩
· simp [h0]
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric_top : (mkMetric (fun _ => ∞ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : OuterMeasure X) = ⊤ := by
simp_rw [mkMetric, mkMetric', mkMetric'.pre, extend_top, boundedBy_top, eq_top_iff]
rw [le_iSup_iff]
intro b hb
simpa using hb ⊤
/-- If `m₁ d ≤ m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0` (we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then
`mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] m₂) :
(mkMetric m₁ : OuterMeasure X) ≤ mkMetric m₂ := by
convert @mkMetric_mono_smul X _ _ m₂ _ ENNReal.one_ne_top one_ne_zero _ <;> simp [*]
theorem isometry_comap_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {f : X → Y} (hf : Isometry f)
(H : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) : comap f (mkMetric m) = mkMetric m := by
simp only [mkMetric, mkMetric', mkMetric'.pre, inducedOuterMeasure, comap_iSup]
refine surjective_id.iSup_congr id fun ε => surjective_id.iSup_congr id fun hε => ?_
rw [comap_boundedBy _ (H.imp _ id)]
· congr with s : 1
apply extend_congr
· simp [hf.ediam_image]
· intros; simp [hf.injective.subsingleton_image_iff, hf.ediam_image]
· intro h_mono s t hst
simp only [extend, le_iInf_iff]
intro ht
apply le_trans _ (h_mono (diam_mono hst))
simp only [(diam_mono hst).trans ht, le_refl, ciInf_pos]
theorem mkMetric_smul (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hc' : c ≠ 0) :
(mkMetric (c • m) : OuterMeasure X) = c • mkMetric m := by
simp only [mkMetric, mkMetric', mkMetric'.pre, inducedOuterMeasure, ENNReal.smul_iSup]
simp_rw [smul_iSup, smul_boundedBy hc, smul_extend _ hc', Pi.smul_apply]
theorem mkMetric_nnreal_smul (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {c : ℝ≥0} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(mkMetric (c • m) : OuterMeasure X) = c • mkMetric m := by
rw [ENNReal.smul_def, ENNReal.smul_def,
mkMetric_smul m ENNReal.coe_ne_top (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr hc)]
theorem isometry_map_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) {f : X → Y} (hf : Isometry f)
(H : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) : map f (mkMetric m) = restrict (range f) (mkMetric m) := by
rw [← isometry_comap_mkMetric _ hf H, map_comap]
theorem isometryEquiv_comap_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (f : X ≃ᵢ Y) :
comap f (mkMetric m) = mkMetric m :=
isometry_comap_mkMetric _ f.isometry (Or.inr f.surjective)
theorem isometryEquiv_map_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (f : X ≃ᵢ Y) :
map f (mkMetric m) = mkMetric m := by
rw [← isometryEquiv_comap_mkMetric _ f, map_comap_of_surjective f.surjective]
theorem trim_mkMetric [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mkMetric m : OuterMeasure X).trim = mkMetric m := by
simp only [mkMetric, mkMetric'.eq_iSup_nat, trim_iSup]
congr 1 with n : 1
refine mkMetric'.trim_pre _ (fun s => ?_) _
simp
theorem le_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : OuterMeasure X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (h0 : 0 < r)
(hr : ∀ s, diam s ≤ r → μ s ≤ m (diam s)) : μ ≤ mkMetric m :=
le_iSup₂_of_le r h0 <| mkMetric'.le_pre.2 fun _ hs => hr _ hs
end OuterMeasure
/-!
### Metric measures
In this section we use `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure` and theorems about
`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric'`/`MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.mkMetric` to define
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric'`/`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`. We also restate some lemmas
about metric outer measures for metric measures.
-/
namespace Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- Given a function `m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric' m` is the supremum of `μ r`
over `r > 0`, where `μ r` is the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s`
for all `s`. While each `μ r` is an *outer* measure, the supremum is a measure. -/
def mkMetric' (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure X :=
(OuterMeasure.mkMetric' m).toMeasure (OuterMeasure.mkMetric'_isMetric _).le_caratheodory
/-- Given a function `m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞`, `mkMetric m` is the supremum of `μ r` over `r > 0`, where
`μ r` is the maximal outer measure `μ` such that `μ s ≤ m s` for all sets `s` that contain at least
two points. While each `mkMetric'.pre` is an *outer* measure, the supremum is a measure. -/
def mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure X :=
(OuterMeasure.mkMetric m).toMeasure (OuterMeasure.mkMetric'_isMetric _).le_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric'_toOuterMeasure (m : Set X → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mkMetric' m).toOuterMeasure = (OuterMeasure.mkMetric' m).trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric_toOuterMeasure (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
(mkMetric m : Measure X).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.mkMetric m :=
OuterMeasure.trim_mkMetric m
end Measure
theorem OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
⇑(OuterMeasure.mkMetric m : OuterMeasure X) = Measure.mkMetric m := by
rw [← Measure.mkMetric_toOuterMeasure, Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure]
namespace Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- If `c ∉ {0, ∞}` and `m₁ d ≤ c * m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0`
(we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then `mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono_smul {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) (h0 : c ≠ 0)
(hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] c • m₂) : (mkMetric m₁ : Measure X) ≤ c • mkMetric m₂ := fun s ↦ by
rw [← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric, coe_smul, ← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric]
exact OuterMeasure.mkMetric_mono_smul hc h0 hle s
@[simp]
theorem mkMetric_top : (mkMetric (fun _ => ∞ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure X) = ⊤ := by
apply toOuterMeasure_injective
rw [mkMetric_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.mkMetric_top, toOuterMeasure_top]
/-- If `m₁ d ≤ m₂ d` for `d < ε` for some `ε > 0` (we use `≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0]` to state this), then
`mkMetric m₁ hm₁ ≤ mkMetric m₂ hm₂`. -/
theorem mkMetric_mono {m₁ m₂ : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : m₁ ≤ᶠ[𝓝[≥] 0] m₂) :
(mkMetric m₁ : Measure X) ≤ mkMetric m₂ := by
convert @mkMetric_mono_smul X _ _ _ _ m₂ _ ENNReal.one_ne_top one_ne_zero _ <;> simp [*]
/-- A formula for `MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`. -/
theorem mkMetric_apply (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set X) :
mkMetric m s =
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (_ : 0 < r),
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t) (_ : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, m (diam (t n)) := by
classical
-- We mostly unfold the definitions but we need to switch the order of `∑'` and `⨅`
simp only [← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric, OuterMeasure.mkMetric, OuterMeasure.mkMetric',
OuterMeasure.iSup_apply, OuterMeasure.mkMetric'.pre, OuterMeasure.boundedBy_apply, extend]
refine
surjective_id.iSup_congr id fun r =>
iSup_congr_Prop Iff.rfl fun _ =>
surjective_id.iInf_congr _ fun t => iInf_congr_Prop Iff.rfl fun ht => ?_
dsimp
by_cases htr : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r
· rw [iInf_eq_if, if_pos htr]
congr 1 with n : 1
simp only [iInf_eq_if, htr n, id, if_true, iSup_and']
· rw [iInf_eq_if, if_neg htr]
push_neg at htr; rcases htr with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨n, ?_⟩
rw [iSup_eq_if, if_pos, iInf_eq_if, if_neg]
· exact hn.not_le
rcases diam_pos_iff.1 ((zero_le r).trans_lt hn) with ⟨x, hx, -⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
theorem le_mkMetric (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure X) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(h : ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ ε → μ s ≤ m (diam s)) : μ ≤ mkMetric m := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_le, mkMetric_toOuterMeasure]
exact OuterMeasure.le_mkMetric m μ.toOuterMeasure ε h₀ h
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure (or, more generally, for a measure defined using
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending to
`0`, indexed by any sequence of countable types. -/
theorem mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, Countable (ι n)] (s : Set X)
{l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
mkMetric m s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑' i, m (diam (t n i))) l := by
haveI : ∀ n, Encodable (ι n) := fun n => Encodable.ofCountable _
simp only [mkMetric_apply]
refine iSup₂_le fun ε hε => ?_
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun c hc => ?_
rcases ((frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt (by isBoundedDefault) hc).and_eventually
((hr.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hε)).and (ht.and hst))).exists with
⟨n, hn, hrn, htn, hstn⟩
set u : ℕ → Set X := fun j => ⋃ b ∈ decode₂ (ι n) j, t n b
refine iInf₂_le_of_le u (by rwa [iUnion_decode₂]) ?_
refine iInf_le_of_le (fun j => ?_) ?_
· rw [EMetric.diam_iUnion_mem_option]
exact iSup₂_le fun _ _ => (htn _).trans hrn.le
· calc
(∑' j : ℕ, ⨆ _ : (u j).Nonempty, m (diam (u j))) = _ :=
tsum_iUnion_decode₂ (fun t : Set X => ⨆ _ : t.Nonempty, m (diam t)) (by simp) _
_ ≤ ∑' i : ι n, m (diam (t n i)) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun b => iSup_le fun _ => le_rfl
_ ≤ c := hn.le
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure (or, more generally, for a measure defined using
`MeasureTheory.Measure.mkMetric`) of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending to
`0`, indexed by any sequence of finite types. -/
theorem mkMetric_le_liminf_sum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [hι : ∀ n, Fintype (ι n)] (s : Set X)
{l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0)) (t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X)
(ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n) (hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) (m : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) :
mkMetric m s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑ i, m (diam (t n i))) l := by
simpa only [tsum_fintype] using mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum s r hr t ht hst m
/-!
### Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension
-/
/-- Hausdorff measure on an (e)metric space. -/
def hausdorffMeasure (d : ℝ) : Measure X :=
mkMetric fun r => r ^ d
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[MeasureTheory] notation "μH[" d "]" => MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d
theorem le_hausdorffMeasure (d : ℝ) (μ : Measure X) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(h : ∀ s : Set X, diam s ≤ ε → μ s ≤ diam s ^ d) : μ ≤ μH[d] :=
le_mkMetric _ μ ε h₀ h
/-- A formula for `μH[d] s`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_apply (d : ℝ) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] s =
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0∞) (_ : 0 < r),
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (_ : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ r),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, diam (t n) ^ d :=
mkMetric_apply _ _
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending
to `0`, indexed by any sequence of countable types. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_tsum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, Countable (ι n)]
(d : ℝ) (s : Set X) {l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0))
(t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X) (ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n)
(hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) : μH[d] s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑' i, diam (t n i) ^ d) l :=
mkMetric_le_liminf_tsum s r hr t ht hst _
/-- To bound the Hausdorff measure of a set, one may use coverings with maximum diameter tending
to `0`, indexed by any sequence of finite types. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum {β : Type*} {ι : β → Type*} [∀ n, Fintype (ι n)]
(d : ℝ) (s : Set X) {l : Filter β} (r : β → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 0))
(t : ∀ n : β, ι n → Set X) (ht : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n)
(hst : ∀ᶠ n in l, s ⊆ ⋃ i, t n i) : μH[d] s ≤ liminf (fun n => ∑ i, diam (t n i) ^ d) l :=
mkMetric_le_liminf_sum s r hr t ht hst _
/-- If `d₁ < d₂`, then for any set `s` we have either `μH[d₂] s = 0`, or `μH[d₁] s = ∞`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top {d₁ d₂ : ℝ} (h : d₁ < d₂) (s : Set X) :
μH[d₂] s = 0 ∨ μH[d₁] s = ∞ := by
by_contra! H
suffices ∀ c : ℝ≥0, c ≠ 0 → μH[d₂] s ≤ c * μH[d₁] s by
rcases ENNReal.exists_nnreal_pos_mul_lt H.2 H.1 with ⟨c, hc0, hc⟩
exact hc.not_le (this c (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hc0))
intro c hc
refine le_iff'.1 (mkMetric_mono_smul ENNReal.coe_ne_top (mod_cast hc) ?_) s
have : 0 < ((c : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (d₂ - d₁)⁻¹) := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hc, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero,
NNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff]
exact mt And.left hc
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsGE this]
rintro r ⟨hr₀, hrc⟩
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hrc
rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul,
← ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inr ENNReal.coe_ne_top) (Or.inr <| mt ENNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 hc)]
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr₀)
· rcases lt_or_le 0 d₂ with (h₂ | h₂)
· simp only [h₂, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_le, ENNReal.zero_div, ENNReal.coe_zero]
· simp only [h.trans_le h₂, ENNReal.div_top, zero_le, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_neg,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
· have : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using hr₀
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_sub _ _ this ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
refine (ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hrc (sub_pos.2 h)).le.trans ?_
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_pos.2 h).ne', ENNReal.rpow_one]
/-- Hausdorff measure `μH[d] s` is monotone in `d`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_mono {d₁ d₂ : ℝ} (h : d₁ ≤ d₂) (s : Set X) : μH[d₂] s ≤ μH[d₁] s := by
rcases h.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h); · exact le_rfl
rcases hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top h s with hs | hs
· rw [hs]; exact zero_le _
· rw [hs]; exact le_top
variable (X) in
theorem noAtoms_hausdorff {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 < d) : NoAtoms (hausdorffMeasure d : Measure X) := by
refine ⟨fun x => ?_⟩
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, hausdorffMeasure_apply]
refine iSup₂_le fun ε _ => iInf₂_le_of_le (fun _ => {x}) ?_ <| iInf_le_of_le (fun _ => ?_) ?_
· exact subset_iUnion (fun _ => {x} : ℕ → Set X) 0
· simp only [EMetric.diam_singleton, zero_le]
· simp [hd]
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton (x : X) : μH[0] ({x} : Set X) = 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· let r : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞ := fun _ => 0
let t : ℕ → Unit → Set X := fun _ _ => {x}
have ht : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ i, diam (t n i) ≤ r n := by
simp only [t, r, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, diam_singleton, eventually_atTop,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, exists_const]
simpa [t, liminf_const] using hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum 0 {x} r tendsto_const_nhds t ht
· rw [hausdorffMeasure_apply]
suffices
(1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set X) (_ : {x} ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) (_ : ∀ n, diam (t n) ≤ 1),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, diam (t n) ^ (0 : ℝ) by
apply le_trans this _
convert le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) (1 : ℝ≥0∞) zero_lt_one
rfl
simp only [ENNReal.rpow_zero, le_iInf_iff]
intro t hst _
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hst (mem_singleton x)) with ⟨m, hm⟩
have A : (t m).Nonempty := ⟨x, hm⟩
calc
(1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨆ h : (t m).Nonempty, 1 := by simp only [A, ciSup_pos]
_ ≤ ∑' n, ⨆ h : (t n).Nonempty, 1 := ENNReal.le_tsum _
theorem one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty {s : Set X} (h : s.Nonempty) : 1 ≤ μH[0] s := by
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
calc
(1 : ℝ≥0∞) = μH[0] ({x} : Set X) := (hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton x).symm
_ ≤ μH[0] s := measure_mono (singleton_subset_iff.2 hx)
theorem hausdorffMeasure_le_one_of_subsingleton {s : Set X} (hs : s.Subsingleton) {d : ℝ}
(hd : 0 ≤ d) : μH[d] s ≤ 1 := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
· simp only [measure_empty, zero_le]
· rw [(subsingleton_iff_singleton hx).1 hs]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with (rfl | dpos)
· simp only [le_refl, hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton]
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff X dpos
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton]
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
/-!
### Hausdorff measure, Hausdorff dimension, and Hölder or Lipschitz continuous maps
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y] [BorelSpace Y]
namespace HolderOnWith
variable {C r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous on `s` with a positive exponent `r`, then
`μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ C ^ d * μH[r * d] s`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image_le (h : HolderOnWith C r f s) (hr : 0 < r) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[r * d] s := by
-- We start with the trivial case `C = 0`
rcases (zero_le C).eq_or_lt with (rfl | hC0)
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
· simp only [measure_empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_zero, image_empty]
have : f '' s = {f x} :=
have : (f '' s).Subsingleton := by simpa [diam_eq_zero_iff] using h.ediam_image_le
(subsingleton_iff_singleton (mem_image_of_mem f hx)).1 this
rw [this]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with (rfl | h'd)
· simp only [ENNReal.rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_zero]
rw [hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton]
exact one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty ⟨x, hx⟩
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff Y h'd
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton]
-- Now assume `C ≠ 0`
· have hCd0 : (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ 0 := by simp [hC0.ne']
have hCd : (C : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ ∞ := by simp [hd]
simp only [hausdorffMeasure_apply, ENNReal.mul_iSup, ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne hCd0 hCd,
← ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
refine iSup_le fun R => iSup_le fun hR => ?_
have : Tendsto (fun d : ℝ≥0∞ => (C : ℝ≥0∞) * d ^ (r : ℝ)) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_const_mul_rpow_nhds_zero_of_pos ENNReal.coe_ne_top hr
rcases ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic.eventually_iff.1 (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hR)) with
⟨δ, δ0, H⟩
refine le_iSup₂_of_le δ δ0 <| iInf₂_mono' fun t hst ↦
⟨fun n => f '' (t n ∩ s), ?_, iInf_mono' fun htδ ↦
⟨fun n => (h.ediam_image_inter_le (t n)).trans (H (htδ n)).le, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← image_iUnion, ← iUnion_inter]
exact image_subset _ (subset_inter hst Subset.rfl)
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_
simp only [iSup_le_iff, image_nonempty]
intro hft
simp only [Nonempty.mono ((t n).inter_subset_left) hft, ciSup_pos]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hd]
exact ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow (h.ediam_image_inter_le _) hd
end HolderOnWith
namespace LipschitzOnWith
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
/-- If `f : X → Y` is `K`-Lipschitz on `s`, then `μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ K ^ d * μH[d] s`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image_le (h : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] s := by
simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using h.holderOnWith.hausdorffMeasure_image_le zero_lt_one hd
end LipschitzOnWith
namespace LipschitzWith
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y}
/-- If `f` is a `K`-Lipschitz map, then it increases the Hausdorff `d`-measures of sets at most
by the factor of `K ^ d`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] (f '' s) ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] s :=
h.lipschitzOnWith.hausdorffMeasure_image_le hd
end LipschitzWith
open scoped Pointwise
theorem MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure_smul₀ {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d)
{r : 𝕜} (hr : r ≠ 0) (s : Set E) : μH[d] (r • s) = ‖r‖₊ ^ d • μH[d] s := by
have {r : 𝕜} (s : Set E) : μH[d] (r • s) ≤ ‖r‖₊ ^ d • μH[d] s := by
simpa [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hd]
using (lipschitzWith_smul r).hausdorffMeasure_image_le hd s
refine le_antisymm (this s) ?_
rw [← le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos]
· dsimp
rw [← NNReal.inv_rpow, ← nnnorm_inv]
· refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (this (r • s))
rw [inv_smul_smul₀ hr]
· simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hr]
/-!
### Antilipschitz maps do not decrease Hausdorff measures and dimension
-/
namespace AntilipschitzWith
variable {f : X → Y} {K : ℝ≥0} {d : ℝ}
theorem hausdorffMeasure_preimage_le (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : Set Y) :
μH[d] (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] s := by
rcases eq_or_ne K 0 with (rfl | h0)
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (f ⁻¹' s) with (hs | ⟨x, hx⟩)
· simp only [hs, measure_empty, zero_le]
have : f ⁻¹' s = {x} := by
haveI : Subsingleton X := hf.subsingleton
have : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := subsingleton_univ.anti (subset_univ _)
exact (subsingleton_iff_singleton hx).1 this
rw [this]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hd with (rfl | h'd)
· simp only [ENNReal.rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_zero]
rw [hausdorffMeasure_zero_singleton]
exact one_le_hausdorffMeasure_zero_of_nonempty ⟨f x, hx⟩
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff X h'd
simp only [zero_le, measure_singleton]
have hKd0 : (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ 0 := by simp [h0]
have hKd : (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d ≠ ∞ := by simp [hd]
simp only [hausdorffMeasure_apply, ENNReal.mul_iSup, ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne hKd0 hKd,
← ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
refine iSup₂_le fun ε ε0 => ?_
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (ε / K) (by simp [ε0.ne']) ?_
refine le_iInf₂ fun t hst => le_iInf fun htε => ?_
replace hst : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ _ := preimage_mono hst; rw [preimage_iUnion] at hst
refine iInf₂_le_of_le _ hst (iInf_le_of_le (fun n => ?_) ?_)
· exact (hf.ediam_preimage_le _).trans (ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div' <| htε n)
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => iSup_le_iff.2 fun hft => ?_
simp only [nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hft, ciSup_pos]
rw [← ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hd]
exact ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow (hf.ediam_preimage_le _) hd
theorem le_hausdorffMeasure_image (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (hd : 0 ≤ d) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] s ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] (f '' s) :=
calc
μH[d] s ≤ μH[d] (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := measure_mono (subset_preimage_image _ _)
_ ≤ (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ d * μH[d] (f '' s) := hf.hausdorffMeasure_preimage_le hd (f '' s)
end AntilipschitzWith
/-!
### Isometries preserve the Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension
-/
namespace Isometry
variable {f : X → Y} {d : ℝ}
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image (hf : Isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective f) (s : Set X) :
μH[d] (f '' s) = μH[d] s := by
simp only [hausdorffMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.coe_mkMetric, ← OuterMeasure.comap_apply]
rw [OuterMeasure.isometry_comap_mkMetric _ hf (hd.imp_left _)]
exact ENNReal.monotone_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem hausdorffMeasure_preimage (hf : Isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective f) (s : Set Y) :
μH[d] (f ⁻¹' s) = μH[d] (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.hausdorffMeasure_image hd, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
theorem map_hausdorffMeasure (hf : Isometry f) (hd : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective f) :
Measure.map f μH[d] = μH[d].restrict (range f) := by
ext1 s hs
rw [map_apply hf.continuous.measurable hs, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
hf.hausdorffMeasure_preimage hd]
end Isometry
namespace IsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_image (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) (s : Set X) : μH[d] (e '' s) = μH[d] s :=
e.isometry.hausdorffMeasure_image (Or.inr e.surjective) s
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_preimage (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) (s : Set Y) : μH[d] (e ⁻¹' s) = μH[d] s := by
rw [← e.image_symm, e.symm.hausdorffMeasure_image]
@[simp]
theorem map_hausdorffMeasure (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) : Measure.map e μH[d] = μH[d] := by
rw [e.isometry.map_hausdorffMeasure (Or.inr e.surjective), e.surjective.range_eq, restrict_univ]
theorem measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (d : ℝ) : MeasurePreserving e μH[d] μH[d] :=
⟨e.continuous.measurable, map_hausdorffMeasure _ _⟩
end IsometryEquiv
namespace MeasureTheory
@[to_additive]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_smul {α : Type*} [SMul α X] [IsIsometricSMul α X] {d : ℝ} (c : α)
(h : 0 ≤ d ∨ Surjective (c • · : X → X)) (s : Set X) : μH[d] (c • s) = μH[d] s :=
(isometry_smul X c).hausdorffMeasure_image h _
@[to_additive]
instance {d : ℝ} [Group X] [IsIsometricSMul X X] : IsMulLeftInvariant (μH[d] : Measure X) where
map_mul_left_eq_self x := (IsometryEquiv.constSMul x).map_hausdorffMeasure _
@[to_additive]
instance {d : ℝ} [Group X] [IsIsometricSMul Xᵐᵒᵖ X] : IsMulRightInvariant (μH[d] : Measure X) where
map_mul_right_eq_self x := (IsometryEquiv.constSMul (MulOpposite.op x)).map_hausdorffMeasure _
/-!
### Hausdorff measure and Lebesgue measure
-/
/-- In the space `ι → ℝ`, the Hausdorff measure coincides exactly with the Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_pi_real {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] :
(μH[Fintype.card ι] : Measure (ι → ℝ)) = volume := by
classical
-- it suffices to check that the two measures coincide on products of rational intervals
refine (pi_eq_generateFrom (fun _ => Real.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioo_rat.symm)
(fun _ => Real.isPiSystem_Ioo_rat) (fun _ => Real.finiteSpanningSetsInIooRat _) ?_).symm
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
-- fix such a product `s` of rational intervals, of the form `Π (a i, b i)`.
intro s hs
choose a b H using hs
obtain rfl : s = fun i => Ioo (α := ℝ) (a i) (b i) := funext fun i => (H i).2
replace H := fun i => (H i).1
apply le_antisymm _
-- first check that `volume s ≤ μH s`
· have Hle : volume ≤ (μH[Fintype.card ι] : Measure (ι → ℝ)) := by
refine le_hausdorffMeasure _ _ ∞ ENNReal.coe_lt_top fun s _ => ?_
rw [ENNReal.rpow_natCast]
exact Real.volume_pi_le_diam_pow s
rw [← volume_pi_pi fun i => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)]
exact Measure.le_iff'.1 Hle _
/- For the other inequality `μH s ≤ volume s`, we use a covering of `s` by sets of small diameter
`1/n`, namely cubes with left-most point of the form `a i + f i / n` with `f i` ranging between
`0` and `⌈(b i - a i) * n⌉`. Their number is asymptotic to `n^d * Π (b i - a i)`. -/
have I : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (b i : ℝ) - a i := fun i => by
simpa only [sub_nonneg, Rat.cast_le] using (H i).le
let γ := fun n : ℕ => ∀ i : ι, Fin ⌈((b i : ℝ) - a i) * n⌉₊
let t : ∀ n : ℕ, γ n → Set (ι → ℝ) := fun n f =>
Set.pi univ fun i => Icc (a i + f i / n) (a i + (f i + 1) / n)
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ≥0∞)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [one_div, ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero]
have B : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ i : γ n, diam (t n i) ≤ 1 / n := by
refine eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
intro f
refine diam_pi_le_of_le fun b => ?_
simp only [Real.ediam_Icc, add_div, ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn), le_refl,
add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, ENNReal.ofReal_one, ENNReal.ofReal_natCast]
have C : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, (Set.pi univ fun i : ι => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) ⊆ ⋃ i : γ n, t n i := by
refine eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
have npos : (0 : ℝ) < n := Nat.cast_pos.2 hn
intro x hx
simp only [mem_Ioo, mem_univ_pi] at hx
simp only [t, mem_iUnion, mem_Ioo, mem_univ_pi]
let f : γ n := fun i =>
⟨⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊, by
apply Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
· refine (mul_lt_mul_right npos).2 ?_
simp only [(hx i).right, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· refine mul_pos ?_ npos
simpa only [Rat.cast_lt, sub_pos] using H i⟩
refine ⟨f, fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· calc
(a i : ℝ) + ⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊ / n ≤ (a i : ℝ) + (x i - a i) * n / n := by
gcongr
exact Nat.floor_le (mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 (hx i).1.le) npos.le)
_ = x i := by field_simp [npos.ne']
· calc
x i = (a i : ℝ) + (x i - a i) * n / n := by field_simp [npos.ne']
_ ≤ (a i : ℝ) + (⌊(x i - a i) * n⌋₊ + 1) / n := by
gcongr
exact (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).le
calc
μH[Fintype.card ι] (Set.pi univ fun i : ι => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) ≤
liminf (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i : γ n, diam (t n i) ^ ((Fintype.card ι) : ℝ)) atTop :=
hausdorffMeasure_le_liminf_sum _ (Set.pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i))
(fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ≥0∞)) A t B C
_ ≤ liminf (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i : γ n, (1 / (n : ℝ≥0∞)) ^ Fintype.card ι) atTop := by
refine liminf_le_liminf ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [B] with _ hn
apply Finset.sum_le_sum fun i _ => _
simp only [ENNReal.rpow_natCast]
intros i _
exact pow_le_pow_left' (hn i) _
· isBoundedDefault
_ = liminf (fun n : ℕ => ∏ i : ι, (⌈((b i : ℝ) - a i) * n⌉₊ : ℝ≥0∞) / n) atTop := by
simp only [γ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.cast_prod, one_mul, Fintype.card_fin, Finset.sum_const,
nsmul_eq_mul, Fintype.card_pi, div_eq_mul_inv, Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_const]
_ = ∏ i : ι, volume (Ioo (a i : ℝ) (b i)) := by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo]
apply Tendsto.liminf_eq
refine ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top _ (fun i _ => ?_) fun i _ => ?_
· apply
Tendsto.congr' _
((ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp
((tendsto_nat_ceil_mul_div_atTop (I i)).comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop))
apply eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, fun n hn => _⟩
intros n hn
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn), comp_apply,
ENNReal.ofReal_natCast]
· simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, Ne, not_false_iff]
instance isAddHaarMeasure_hausdorffMeasure {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (G := E) μH[finrank ℝ E] where
lt_top_of_isCompact K hK := by
set e : E ≃L[ℝ] Fin (finrank ℝ E) → ℝ := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq (by simp)
suffices μH[finrank ℝ E] (e '' K) < ⊤ by
rw [← e.symm_image_image K]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt <| e.symm.lipschitz.hausdorffMeasure_image_le (by simp) (e '' K)
rw [ENNReal.rpow_natCast]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top (ENNReal.pow_lt_top ENNReal.coe_lt_top) this
conv_lhs => congr; congr; rw [← Fintype.card_fin (finrank ℝ E)]
rw [hausdorffMeasure_pi_real]
exact (hK.image e.continuous).measure_lt_top
open_pos U hU hU' := by
set e : E ≃L[ℝ] Fin (finrank ℝ E) → ℝ := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq (by simp)
suffices 0 < μH[finrank ℝ E] (e '' U) from
(ENNReal.mul_pos_iff.mp (lt_of_lt_of_le this <|
e.lipschitz.hausdorffMeasure_image_le (by simp) _)).2.ne'
conv_rhs => congr; congr; rw [← Fintype.card_fin (finrank ℝ E)]
rw [hausdorffMeasure_pi_real]
apply (e.isOpenMap U hU).measure_pos (μ := volume)
simpa
variable (ι X)
theorem hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_funUnique [Unique ι]
[SecondCountableTopology X] (d : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.funUnique ι X) μH[d] μH[d] :=
(IsometryEquiv.funUnique ι X).measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure _
theorem hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_piFinTwo (α : Fin 2 → Type*)
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, EMetricSpace (α i)] [∀ i, BorelSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, SecondCountableTopology (α i)] (d : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (MeasurableEquiv.piFinTwo α) μH[d] μH[d] :=
(IsometryEquiv.piFinTwo α).measurePreserving_hausdorffMeasure _
/-- In the space `ℝ`, the Hausdorff measure coincides exactly with the Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_real : (μH[1] : Measure ℝ) = volume := by
rw [← (volume_preserving_funUnique Unit ℝ).map_eq,
← (hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_funUnique Unit ℝ 1).map_eq,
← hausdorffMeasure_pi_real, Fintype.card_unit, Nat.cast_one]
/-- In the space `ℝ × ℝ`, the Hausdorff measure coincides exactly with the Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_prod_real : (μH[2] : Measure (ℝ × ℝ)) = volume := by
rw [← (volume_preserving_piFinTwo fun _ => ℝ).map_eq,
← (hausdorffMeasure_measurePreserving_piFinTwo (fun _ => ℝ) _).map_eq,
← hausdorffMeasure_pi_real, Fintype.card_fin, Nat.cast_two]
/-! ### Geometric results in affine spaces -/
section Geometric
variable {𝕜 E P : Type*}
theorem hausdorffMeasure_smul_right_image [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (v : E) (s : Set ℝ) :
μH[1] ((fun r => r • v) '' s) = ‖v‖₊ • μH[1] s := by
obtain rfl | hv := eq_or_ne v 0
· haveI := noAtoms_hausdorff E one_pos
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
simp [hs]
have hn : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hv
-- break lineMap into pieces
suffices
μH[1] ((‖v‖ • ·) '' (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℝ E (‖v‖⁻¹ • v) '' s)) = ‖v‖₊ • μH[1] s by
simpa only [Set.image_image, smul_comm (norm _), inv_smul_smul₀ hn,
LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply] using this
have iso_smul : Isometry (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℝ E (‖v‖⁻¹ • v)) := by
refine AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm _ fun x => (norm_smul _ _).trans ?_
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_norm, inv_mul_cancel₀ hn, mul_one, LinearMap.id_apply]
rw [Set.image_smul, Measure.hausdorffMeasure_smul₀ zero_le_one hn, nnnorm_norm,
NNReal.rpow_one, iso_smul.hausdorffMeasure_image (Or.inl <| zero_le_one' ℝ)]
section NormedFieldAffine
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [MeasurableSpace P]
variable [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor E P] [BorelSpace P]
/-- Scaling by `c` around `x` scales the measure by `‖c‖₊ ^ d`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_homothety_image {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) (x : P) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0)
(s : Set P) : μH[d] (AffineMap.homothety x c '' s) = ‖c‖₊ ^ d • μH[d] s := by
suffices
μH[d] (IsometryEquiv.vaddConst x '' ((c • ·) '' ((IsometryEquiv.vaddConst x).symm '' s))) =
‖c‖₊ ^ d • μH[d] s by
simpa only [Set.image_image]
borelize E
rw [IsometryEquiv.hausdorffMeasure_image, Set.image_smul, Measure.hausdorffMeasure_smul₀ hd hc,
IsometryEquiv.hausdorffMeasure_image]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_homothety_preimage {d : ℝ} (hd : 0 ≤ d) (x : P) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0)
(s : Set P) : μH[d] (AffineMap.homothety x c ⁻¹' s) = ‖c‖₊⁻¹ ^ d • μH[d] s := by
change μH[d] (AffineEquiv.homothetyUnitsMulHom x (Units.mk0 c hc) ⁻¹' s) = _
rw [← AffineEquiv.image_symm, AffineEquiv.coe_homothetyUnitsMulHom_apply_symm,
hausdorffMeasure_homothety_image hd x (_ : 𝕜ˣ).isUnit.ne_zero, Units.val_inv_eq_inv_val,
Units.val_mk0, nnnorm_inv]
/-! TODO: prove `Measure.map (AffineMap.homothety x c) μH[d] = ‖c‖₊⁻¹ ^ d • μH[d]`, which needs a
more general version of `AffineMap.homothety_continuous`. -/
end NormedFieldAffine
section RealAffine
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace P]
variable [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor E P] [BorelSpace P]
/-- Mapping a set of reals along a line segment scales the measure by the length of a segment.
This is an auxiliary result used to prove `hausdorffMeasure_affineSegment`. -/
theorem hausdorffMeasure_lineMap_image (x y : P) (s : Set ℝ) :
μH[1] (AffineMap.lineMap x y '' s) = nndist x y • μH[1] s := by
suffices μH[1] (IsometryEquiv.vaddConst x '' ((· • (y -ᵥ x)) '' s)) = nndist x y • μH[1] s by
simpa only [Set.image_image]
borelize E
rw [IsometryEquiv.hausdorffMeasure_image, hausdorffMeasure_smul_right_image,
nndist_eq_nnnorm_vsub' E]
/-- The measure of a segment is the distance between its endpoints. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_affineSegment (x y : P) : μH[1] (affineSegment ℝ x y) = edist x y := by
rw [affineSegment, hausdorffMeasure_lineMap_image, hausdorffMeasure_real, Real.volume_Icc,
sub_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_one, ← Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact (edist_nndist _ _).symm
end RealAffine
/-- The measure of a segment is the distance between its endpoints. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_segment {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (x y : E) : μH[1] (segment ℝ x y) = edist x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_eq_segment, hausdorffMeasure_affineSegment]
end Geometric
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Hausdorff.lean | 1,103 | 1,111 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,723 | 1,726 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter hiding map
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
The measure of a set `s`, denoted `μ s`, is an extended nonnegative real. The real-valued version
is written `μ.real s`.
-/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
/-- Notation for `Measure` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra in the domain. -/
scoped notation "Measure[" mα "] " α:arg => @Measure α mα
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := measure_empty (μ := m.toOuterMeasure)
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
/-- The real-valued version of a measure. Maps infinite measure sets to zero. Use as `μ.real s`.
The API is developed in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real`. -/
protected def Measure.real {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
(μ s).toReal
theorem measureReal_def {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.real s = (μ s).toReal := rfl
alias Measure.real_def := measureReal_def
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by
rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- A variant of `measure_eq_iInf` which has a single `iInf`. This is useful when applying a
lemma next that only works for non-empty infima, in which case you can use
`nonempty_measurable_superset`. -/
theorem measure_eq_iInf' (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = ⨅ t : { t // s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t }, μ t := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_and, ← measure_eq_iInf]
theorem measure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ s = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
theorem toOuterMeasure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ.toOuterMeasure = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
theorem measure_eq_extend (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ s = extend (fun t (_ht : MeasurableSet t) => μ t) s := by
rw [extend_eq]
exact hs
theorem nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (h : μ s ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ measure_empty
theorem measure_mono_top (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : μ s₁ = ∞) : μ s₂ = ∞ :=
top_unique <| h₁ ▸ measure_mono h
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_left : μ s ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_left
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_right : μ t ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_right
/-- For every set there exists a measurable superset of the same measure. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using μ.toOuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim s
/-- For every set `s` and a countable collection of measures `μ i` there exists a measurable
superset `t ⊇ s` such that each measure `μ i` takes the same value on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ ∀ i, μ i t = μ i s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using
OuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim (fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) s
theorem exists_measurable_superset₂ (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s ∧ ν t = ν s := by
simpa only [Bool.forall_bool.trans and_comm] using
exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq (fun b => cond b μ ν) s
theorem exists_measurable_superset_of_null (h : μ s = 0) : ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0 :=
h ▸ exists_measurable_superset μ s
theorem exists_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero :
(∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_t, hst, _, ht⟩ => measure_mono_null hst ht, exists_measurable_superset_of_null⟩
theorem measure_biUnion_lt_top {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Finite)
(hfin : ∀ i ∈ s, μ (f i) < ∞) : μ (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) < ∞ := by
convert (measure_biUnion_finset_le (μ := μ) hs.toFinset f).trans_lt _ using 3
· ext
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset]
· simpa only [ENNReal.sum_lt_top, Finite.mem_toFinset]
theorem measure_union_lt_top (hs : μ s < ∞) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ :=
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hs, ht⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_lt_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ ↔ μ s < ∞ ∧ μ t < ∞ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => measure_union_lt_top h.1 h.2⟩
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_left).trans_lt h
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_right).trans_lt h
theorem measure_union_ne_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_union_lt_top hs.lt_top ht.lt_top).ne
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem measure_symmDiff_ne_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞ :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top (measure_union_ne_top hs ht) <| measure_mono symmDiff_subset_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_eq_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) = ∞ ↔ μ s = ∞ ∨ μ t = ∞ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simp only [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, ← Ne.eq_def, not_or, measure_union_lt_top_iff]
theorem exists_measure_pos_of_not_measure_iUnion_null [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : μ (⋃ n, s n) ≠ 0) : ∃ n, 0 < μ (s n) := by
contrapose! hs
exact measure_iUnion_null fun n => nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (hs n)
theorem measure_lt_top_of_subset (hst : t ⊆ s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ t < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (μ.mono hst) hs.lt_top
theorem measure_ne_top_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_lt_top_of_subset h ht).ne
theorem measure_inter_lt_top_of_left_ne_top (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ :=
measure_lt_top_of_subset inter_subset_left hs_finite
theorem measure_inter_lt_top_of_right_ne_top (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ :=
measure_lt_top_of_subset inter_subset_right ht_finite
theorem measure_inter_null_of_null_right (S : Set α) {T : Set α} (h : μ T = 0) : μ (S ∩ T) = 0 :=
measure_mono_null inter_subset_right h
theorem measure_inter_null_of_null_left {S : Set α} (T : Set α) (h : μ S = 0) : μ (S ∩ T) = 0 :=
measure_mono_null inter_subset_left h
/-! ### The almost everywhere filter -/
section ae
/-- Given a predicate on `β` and `Set α` where both `α` and `β` are measurable spaces, if the
predicate holds for almost every `x : β` and
- `∅ : Set α`
- a family of sets generating the σ-algebra of `α`
Moreover, if for almost every `x : β`, the predicate is closed under complements and countable
disjoint unions, then the predicate holds for almost every `x : β` and all measurable sets of `α`.
This is an AE version of `MeasurableSpace.induction_on_inter` where the condition is dependent
on a measurable space `β`. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSpace.ae_induction_on_inter
{α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure β}
{C : β → Set α → Prop} {s : Set (Set α)} [m : MeasurableSpace α]
(h_eq : m = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom s)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem s) (h_empty : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, C x ∅) (h_basic : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ t ∈ s, C x t)
(h_compl : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ t, MeasurableSet t → C x t → C x tᶜ)
(h_union : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ f : ℕ → Set α,
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → (∀ i, C x (f i)) → C x (⋃ i, f i)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ ⦃t⦄, MeasurableSet t → C x t := by
filter_upwards [h_empty, h_basic, h_compl, h_union] with x hx_empty hx_basic hx_compl hx_union
using MeasurableSpace.induction_on_inter (C := fun t _ ↦ C x t)
h_eq h_inter hx_empty hx_basic hx_compl hx_union
end ae
open Classical in
/-- A measurable set `t ⊇ s` such that `μ t = μ s`. It even satisfies `μ (t ∩ u) = μ (s ∩ u)` for
any measurable set `u` if `μ s ≠ ∞`, see `measure_toMeasurable_inter`.
(This property holds without the assumption `μ s ≠ ∞` when the space is s-finite -- for example
σ-finite), see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`).
If `s` is a null measurable set, then
we also have `t =ᵐ[μ] s`, see `NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq`.
This notion is sometimes called a "measurable hull" in the literature. -/
irreducible_def toMeasurable (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Set α :=
if h : ∃ t, t ⊇ s ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ t =ᵐ[μ] s then h.choose else
if h' : ∃ t, t ⊇ s ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧
∀ u, MeasurableSet u → μ (t ∩ u) = μ (s ∩ u) then h'.choose
else (exists_measurable_superset μ s).choose
theorem subset_toMeasurable (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ toMeasurable μ s := by
rw [toMeasurable_def]; split_ifs with hs h's
exacts [hs.choose_spec.1, h's.choose_spec.1, (exists_measurable_superset μ s).choose_spec.1]
theorem ae_le_toMeasurable : s ≤ᵐ[μ] toMeasurable μ s :=
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
@[simp]
theorem measurableSet_toMeasurable (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
MeasurableSet (toMeasurable μ s) := by
rw [toMeasurable_def]; split_ifs with hs h's
exacts [hs.choose_spec.2.1, h's.choose_spec.2.1,
(exists_measurable_superset μ s).choose_spec.2.1]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable (s : Set α) : μ (toMeasurable μ s) = μ s := by
rw [toMeasurable_def]; split_ifs with hs h's
· exact measure_congr hs.choose_spec.2.2
· simpa only [inter_univ] using h's.choose_spec.2.2 univ MeasurableSet.univ
· exact (exists_measurable_superset μ s).choose_spec.2.2
/-- A measure space is a measurable space equipped with a
measure, referred to as `volume`. -/
class MeasureSpace (α : Type*) extends MeasurableSpace α where
volume : Measure α
export MeasureSpace (volume)
/-- `volume` is the canonical measure on `α`. -/
add_decl_doc volume
section MeasureSpace
/-- `∀ᵐ a, p a` means that `p a` for a.e. `a`, i.e. `p` holds true away from a null set.
This is notation for `Filter.Eventually P (MeasureTheory.ae MeasureSpace.volume)`. -/
notation3 "∀ᵐ "(...)", "r:(scoped P =>
Filter.Eventually P <| MeasureTheory.ae MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume) => r
/-- `∃ᵐ a, p a` means that `p` holds frequently, i.e. on a set of positive measure,
w.r.t. the volume measure.
This is notation for `Filter.Frequently P (MeasureTheory.ae MeasureSpace.volume)`. -/
notation3 "∃ᵐ "(...)", "r:(scoped P =>
Filter.Frequently P <| MeasureTheory.ae MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume) => r
| /-- The tactic `exact volume`, to be used in optional (`autoParam`) arguments. -/
macro "volume_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic| (first | exact MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume))
end MeasureSpace
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 357 | 361 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.PeakFunction
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
/-!
# Fourier inversion formula
In a finite-dimensional real inner product space, we show the Fourier inversion formula, i.e.,
`𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v = f v` if `f` and `𝓕 f` are integrable, and `f` is continuous at `v`. This is proved
in `MeasureTheory.Integrable.fourier_inversion`. See also `Continuous.fourier_inversion`
giving `𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) = f` under an additional continuity assumption for `f`.
We use the following proof. A naïve computation gives
`𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v
= ∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw
= ∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) ∫_x, exp (-2 I π ⟪w, x⟫) f x dx) dw
= ∫_x (∫_ w, exp (2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw) f x dx `
However, the Fubini step does not make sense for lack of integrability, and the middle integral
`∫_ w, exp (2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw` (which one would like to be a Dirac at `v - x`) is not defined.
To gain integrability, one multiplies with a Gaussian function `exp (-c⁻¹ ‖w‖^2)`, with a large
(but finite) `c`. As this function converges pointwise to `1` when `c → ∞`, we get
`∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw = lim_c ∫_w exp (-c⁻¹ ‖w‖^2 + 2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw`.
One can perform Fubini on the right hand side for fixed `c`, writing the integral as
`∫_x (∫_w exp (-c⁻¹‖w‖^2 + 2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw)) f x dx`.
The middle factor is the Fourier transform of a more and more flat function
(converging to the constant `1`), hence it becomes more and more concentrated, around the
point `v`. (Morally, it converges to the Dirac at `v`). Moreover, it has integral one.
Therefore, multiplying by `f` and integrating, one gets a term converging to `f v` as `c → ∞`.
Since it also converges to `𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v`, this proves the result.
To check the concentration property of the middle factor and the fact that it has integral one, we
rely on the explicit computation of the Fourier transform of Gaussians.
-/
open Filter MeasureTheory Complex Module Metric Real Bornology
open scoped Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace Complex
variable {V E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : V → E}
namespace Real
lemma tendsto_integral_cexp_sq_smul (hf : Integrable f) :
Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ v : V, cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖v‖^2) • f v))
atTop (𝓝 (∫ v : V, f v)) := by
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence _ _ _ hf.norm
· filter_upwards with v
nth_rewrite 2 [show f v = cexp (- (0 : ℝ) * ‖v‖^2) • f v by simp]
apply (Tendsto.cexp _).smul_const
exact tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.ofReal.neg.mul_const _
· filter_upwards with c using
AEStronglyMeasurable.smul (Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable (by fun_prop)) hf.1
· filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with c (hc : 0 ≤ c)
filter_upwards with v
simp only [ofReal_inv, neg_mul, norm_smul]
norm_cast
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul (‖f v‖)]
gcongr
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, exp_le_one_iff, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
positivity
variable [CompleteSpace E]
lemma tendsto_integral_gaussian_smul (hf : Integrable f) (h'f : Integrable (𝓕 f)) (v : V) :
Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦
∫ w : V, ((π * c) ^ (finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π ^ 2 * c * ‖v - w‖ ^ 2)) • f w)
atTop (𝓝 (𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v)) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ w : V, cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖w‖^2 + 2 * π * I * ⟪v, w⟫)
• (𝓕 f) w)) atTop (𝓝 (𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v)) := by
have : Integrable (fun w ↦ 𝐞 ⟪w, v⟫ • (𝓕 f) w) := by
have B : Continuous fun p : V × V => (- innerₗ V) p.1 p.2 := continuous_inner.neg
simpa using
(VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff Real.continuous_fourierChar B v).2 h'f
convert tendsto_integral_cexp_sq_smul this using 4 with c w
· rw [Submonoid.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, smul_smul, ← Complex.exp_add, real_inner_comm]
congr 3
simp only [ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat]
ring
· simp [fourierIntegralInv_eq]
have B : Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ w : V,
𝓕 (fun w ↦ cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖w‖^2 + 2 * π * I * ⟪v, w⟫)) w • f w)) atTop
(𝓝 (𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v)) := by
apply A.congr'
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with c (hc : 0 < c)
have J : Integrable (fun w ↦ cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖w‖^2 + 2 * π * I * ⟪v, w⟫)) :=
GaussianFourier.integrable_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add (by simpa) _ _
simpa using (VectorFourier.integral_fourierIntegral_smul_eq_flip (L := innerₗ V)
Real.continuous_fourierChar continuous_inner J hf).symm
apply B.congr'
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with c (hc : 0 < c)
congr with w
rw [fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace' (by simpa)]
congr
· simp
· simp; ring
| lemma tendsto_integral_gaussian_smul' (hf : Integrable f) {v : V} (h'f : ContinuousAt f v) :
Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦
∫ w : V, ((π * c : ℂ) ^ (finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π ^ 2 * c * ‖v - w‖ ^ 2)) • f w)
atTop (𝓝 (f v)) := by
let φ : V → ℝ := fun w ↦ π ^ (finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℝ) * Real.exp (-π^2 * ‖w‖^2)
have A : Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ ∫ w : V, (c ^ finrank ℝ V * φ (c • (v - w))) • f w)
atTop (𝓝 (f v)) := by
apply tendsto_integral_comp_smul_smul_of_integrable'
· exact fun x ↦ by positivity
· rw [integral_const_mul, GaussianFourier.integral_rexp_neg_mul_sq_norm (by positivity)]
nth_rewrite 2 [← pow_one π]
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_sub pi_pos, ← rpow_mul pi_nonneg,
← rpow_add pi_pos]
ring_nf
exact rpow_zero _
· have A : Tendsto (fun (w : V) ↦ π^2 * ‖w‖^2) (cobounded V) atTop := by
rw [tendsto_const_mul_atTop_of_pos (by positivity)]
apply (tendsto_pow_atTop two_ne_zero).comp tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop
have B := tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero (finrank ℝ V / 2) 1
zero_lt_one |>.comp A |>.const_mul (π ^ (-finrank ℝ V / 2 : ℝ))
rw [mul_zero] at B
convert B using 2 with x
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, Function.comp_apply, ← mul_assoc, ← rpow_natCast, φ]
congr 1
rw [mul_rpow (by positivity) (by positivity), ← rpow_mul pi_nonneg,
← rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _), ← mul_assoc, ← rpow_add pi_pos, mul_comm]
congr <;> ring
· exact hf
· exact h'f
have B : Tendsto
(fun (c : ℝ) ↦ ∫ w : V, ((c^(1/2 : ℝ)) ^ finrank ℝ V * φ ((c^(1/2 : ℝ)) • (v - w))) • f w)
atTop (𝓝 (f v)) :=
A.comp (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by norm_num))
apply B.congr'
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with c (hc : 0 < c)
congr with w
rw [← coe_smul]
congr
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_exp, ← mul_assoc]
congr
· rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg pi_nonneg hc.le, ← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hc.le, mul_comm,
ofReal_cpow pi_nonneg, ofReal_cpow hc.le]
simp [div_eq_inv_mul]
· norm_cast
simp only [one_div, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, mul_pow, sq_abs, neg_mul, neg_inj,
← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hc.le, mul_assoc]
norm_num
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/Inversion.lean | 104 | 150 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Thomas Browning, Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.FixedPoints
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Subgroups generated by transpositions
This file studies subgroups generated by transpositions.
## Main results
- `swap_mem_closure_isSwap` : If a subgroup is generated by transpositions, then a transposition
`swap x y` lies in the subgroup if and only if `x` lies in the same orbit as `y`.
- `mem_closure_isSwap` : If a subgroup is generated by transpositions, then a permutation `f`
lies in the subgroup if and only if `f` has finite support and `f x` always lies in the same
orbit as `x`.
-/
open Equiv List MulAction Pointwise Set Subgroup
variable {G α : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
/-- If the support of each element in a generating set of a permutation group is finite,
then the support of every element in the group is finite. -/
theorem finite_compl_fixedBy_closure_iff {S : Set G} :
(∀ g ∈ closure S, (fixedBy α g)ᶜ.Finite) ↔ ∀ g ∈ S, (fixedBy α g)ᶜ.Finite :=
⟨fun h g hg ↦ h g (subset_closure hg), fun h g hg ↦ by
refine closure_induction h (by simp) (fun g g' _ _ hg hg' ↦ (hg.union hg').subset ?_)
(by simp) hg
simp_rw [← compl_inter, compl_subset_compl, fixedBy_mul]⟩
/-- Given a symmetric generating set of a permutation group, if T is a nonempty proper subset of
an orbit, then there exists a generator that sends some element of T into the complement of T. -/
theorem exists_smul_not_mem_of_subset_orbit_closure (S : Set G) (T : Set α) {a : α}
(hS : ∀ g ∈ S, g⁻¹ ∈ S) (subset : T ⊆ orbit (closure S) a) (not_mem : a ∉ T)
(nonempty : T.Nonempty) : ∃ σ ∈ S, ∃ a ∈ T, σ • a ∉ T := by
have key0 : ¬ closure S ≤ stabilizer G T := by
have ⟨b, hb⟩ := nonempty
| obtain ⟨σ, rfl⟩ := subset hb
contrapose! not_mem with h
exact smul_mem_smul_set_iff.mp ((h σ.2).symm ▸ hb)
contrapose! key0
refine (closure_le _).mpr fun σ hσ ↦ ?_
simp_rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_stabilizer_iff, Set.ext_iff, mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
exact fun a ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ smul_inv_smul σ a ▸ key0 σ hσ (σ⁻¹ • a) h, key0 σ⁻¹ (hS σ hσ) a⟩
variable [DecidableEq α]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/ClosureSwap.lean | 47 | 55 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
/-! # Image and map operations on finite sets
This file provides the finite analog of `Set.image`, along with some other similar functions.
Note there are two ways to take the image over a finset; via `Finset.image` which applies the
function then removes duplicates (requiring `DecidableEq`), or via `Finset.map` which exploits
injectivity of the function to avoid needing to deduplicate. Choosing between these is similar to
choosing between `insert` and `Finset.cons`, or between `Finset.union` and `Finset.disjUnion`.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.filterMap` Given a function `f : α → Option β`, `s.filterMap f` is the
image finset in `β`, filtering out `none`s.
* `Finset.subtype`: `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose elements belong to `s`.
* `Finset.fin`:`s.fin n` is the finset of all elements of `s` less than `n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid OrderedCommMonoid
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Multiset
open Function
namespace Finset
/-! ### map -/
section Map
open Function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, s.2.map f.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : Finset α).map f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
-- Higher priority to apply before `mem_map`.
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f.toEmbedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_map]
exact
⟨by
rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩
simpa, fun h => ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
| theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ a, a ∈ s.map f → Prop} :
(∀ y (H : y ∈ s.map f), p y H) ↔ ∀ x (H : x ∈ s), p (f x) (mem_map_of_mem _ H) :=
⟨fun h y hy => h (f y) (mem_map_of_mem _ hy),
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Image.lean | 81 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# (Lax) monoidal functors
A lax monoidal functor `F` between monoidal categories `C` and `D`
is a functor between the underlying categories equipped with morphisms
* `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` (called the unit morphism)
* `μ X Y : (F.obj X) ⊗ (F.obj Y) ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)` (called the tensorator, or strength).
satisfying various axioms. This is implemented as a typeclass `F.LaxMonoidal`.
Similarly, we define the typeclass `F.OplaxMonoidal`. For these oplax monoidal functors,
we have similar data `η` and `δ`, but with morphisms in the opposite direction.
A monoidal functor (`F.Monoidal`) is defined here as the combination of `F.LaxMonoidal`
and `F.OplaxMonoidal`, with the additional conditions that `ε`/`η` and `μ`/`δ` are
inverse isomorphisms.
We show that the composition of (lax) monoidal functors gives a (lax) monoidal functor.
See `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation` for monoidal natural transformations.
We show in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_` that lax monoidal functors take monoid objects
to monoid objects.
## References
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFL>.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₁' u₁ u₂ u₃ u₁'
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Functor MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
{D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D]
{E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] [MonoidalCategory.{v₃} E]
{C' : Type u₁'} [Category.{v₁'} C']
(F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
namespace Functor
-- The direction of `left_unitality` and `right_unitality` as simp lemmas may look strange:
-- remember the rule of thumb that component indices of natural transformations
-- "weigh more" than structural maps.
-- (However by this argument `associativity` is currently stated backwards!)
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` between monoidal categories is lax monoidal if it is
equipped with morphisms `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` and `μ X Y : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)`,
satisfying the appropriate coherences. -/
@[ext]
class LaxMonoidal where
/-- unit morphism -/
ε' : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)
/-- tensorator -/
μ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)
μ'_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
F.map f ▷ F.obj X' ≫ μ' Y X' = μ' X X' ≫ F.map (f ▷ X') := by
aesop_cat
μ'_natural_right :
∀ {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) ,
F.obj X' ◁ F.map f ≫ μ' X' Y = μ' X' X ≫ F.map (X' ◁ f) := by
aesop_cat
/-- associativity of the tensorator -/
associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
μ' X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ F.obj X ◁ μ' Y Z ≫ μ' X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat
-- unitality
left_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = ε' ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ' (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
right_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.obj X ◁ ε' ≫ μ' X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
namespace LaxMonoidal
section
variable [F.LaxMonoidal]
/-- the unit morphism of a lax monoidal functor -/
def ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C) := ε'
/-- the tensorator of a lax monoidal functor -/
def μ (X Y : C) : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y) := μ' X Y
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma μ_natural_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C) :
F.map f ▷ F.obj X' ≫ μ F Y X' = μ F X X' ≫ F.map (f ▷ X') := by
apply μ'_natural_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma μ_natural_right {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.obj X' ◁ F.map f ≫ μ F X' Y = μ F X' X ≫ F.map (X' ◁ f) := by
apply μ'_natural_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma associativity (X Y Z : C) :
μ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ F (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ F.obj X ◁ μ F Y Z ≫ μ F X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
apply associativity'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma left_unitality (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = ε F ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ F (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
apply left_unitality'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma right_unitality (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.obj X ◁ ε F ≫ μ F X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
apply right_unitality'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_natural {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ F Y Y' = μ F X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem left_unitality_inv (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ ε F ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ F (𝟙_ C) X = F.map (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, left_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem right_unitality_inv (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.obj X ◁ ε F ≫ μ F X (𝟙_ C) = F.map (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, right_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem associativity_inv (X Y Z : C) :
F.obj X ◁ μ F Y Z ≫ μ F X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).inv ≫ μ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ F (X ⊗ Y) Z := by
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, ← associativity_assoc, ← F.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id,
F.map_id, comp_id]
end
section
variable {F}
/- unit morphism -/
(ε' : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C))
/- tensorator -/
(μ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y))
(μ'_natural :
∀ {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y'),
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ' Y Y' = μ' X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
aesop_cat)
/- associativity of the tensorator -/
| (associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(μ' X Y ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj Z)) ≫ μ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ μ' Y Z) ≫ μ' X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Functor.lean | 164 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Antidiag.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Main definitions
- `MvPowerSeries.C`: constant power series
- `MvPowerSeries.X`: the indeterminates
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff`, `MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff`:
the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries`, its constant coefficient
- `MvPowerSeries.monomial`: the monomials
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul`: computes the coefficients of the product of two `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_prod` : computes the coefficients of products of `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_pow` : computes the coefficients of powers of a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_nilpotent`: if the constant coefficient
of a `MvPowerSeries` is nilpotent, then some coefficients of its powers are automatically zero
- `MvPowerSeries.map`: apply a `RingHom` to the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries` (as a `RingHom)
- `MvPowerSeries.X_pow_dvd_iff`, `MvPowerSeries.X_dvd_iff`: equivalent
conditions for (a power of) an indeterminate to divide a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPolynomial.toMvPowerSeries`: the canonical coercion from `MvPolynomial` to `MvPowerSeries`
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
theorem coeff_apply (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R d f = f d :=
rfl
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
dsimp only [coeff, MvPowerSeries]
rw [monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m), LinearMap.single_apply, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_same _ _
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_coeff_zero {f : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
f = 0 ↔ (∀ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f = 0) :=
MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff_exists_coeff_ne_zero (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
f ≠ 0 ↔ (∃ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f ≠ 0) := by
simp only [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff, ne_eq, coeff_zero, not_forall]
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact le_add_left le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem commute_monomial {a : R} {n} :
Commute φ (monomial R n a) ↔ ∀ m, Commute (coeff R m φ) a := by
rw [commute_iff_eq, MvPowerSeries.ext_iff]
refine ⟨fun h m => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· have := h (m + n)
rwa [coeff_add_mul_monomial, add_comm, coeff_add_monomial_mul] at this
· rw [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial_mul]
split_ifs <;> [apply h; rfl]
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = φ :=
ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ 1
protected theorem mul_one : φ * 1 = φ :=
ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ 1
protected theorem mul_add (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : φ₁ * (φ₂ + φ₃) = φ₁ * φ₂ + φ₁ * φ₃ :=
ext fun n => by
classical simp only [coeff_mul, mul_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib, LinearMap.map_add]
protected theorem add_mul (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : (φ₁ + φ₂) * φ₃ = φ₁ * φ₃ + φ₂ * φ₃ :=
ext fun n => by
classical simp only [coeff_mul, add_mul, Finset.sum_add_distrib, LinearMap.map_add]
protected theorem mul_assoc (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : φ₁ * φ₂ * φ₃ = φ₁ * (φ₂ * φ₃) := by
ext1 n
classical
simp only [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_mul, Finset.mul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l + j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i + k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp [add_assoc, mul_assoc])
instance : Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with
mul_one := MvPowerSeries.mul_one
one_mul := MvPowerSeries.one_mul
mul_assoc := MvPowerSeries.mul_assoc
mul_zero := MvPowerSeries.mul_zero
zero_mul := MvPowerSeries.zero_mul
left_distrib := MvPowerSeries.mul_add
right_distrib := MvPowerSeries.add_mul }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := fun φ ψ =>
ext fun n => by
classical
simpa only [coeff_mul, mul_comm] using
sum_antidiagonal_swap n fun a b => coeff R a φ * coeff R b ψ }
instance [Ring R] : Ring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with }
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a b : R) :
monomial R m a * monomial R n b = monomial R (m + n) (a * b) := by
classical
ext k
simp only [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₃ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [← h₂, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h₁] at h₃
exact (h₃ rfl).elim
· rw [h₃, add_tsub_cancel_right] at h₂
exact (h₂ rfl).elim
· exact zero_mul b
· rw [h₂] at h₁
exact (h₁ <| le_add_left le_rfl).elim
variable (σ) (R)
/-- The constant multivariate formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* MvPowerSeries σ R :=
{ monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) with
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun a b => (monomial_mul_monomial 0 0 a b).symm
map_zero' := (monomial R 0).map_zero }
variable {σ} {R}
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = C σ R :=
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) a = C σ R a :=
rfl
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a) = if n = 0 then a else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (C σ R a) = a :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 a
/-- The variables of the multivariate formal power series ring. -/
def X (s : σ) : MvPowerSeries σ R :=
monomial R (single s 1) 1
theorem coeff_X [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) :
coeff R n (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = single s 1 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_index_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s t : σ) :
coeff R (single t 1) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if t = s then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X, single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℕ) ≠ 0)]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_index_single_self_X (s : σ) : coeff R (single s 1) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same _ _
theorem coeff_zero_X (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coeff_X, if_neg]
intro h
exact one_ne_zero (single_eq_zero.mp h.symm)
theorem commute_X (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : Commute φ (X s) :=
φ.commute_monomial.mpr fun _m => Commute.one_right _
theorem X_mul {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} {s : σ} : X s * φ = φ * X s :=
φ.commute_X s |>.symm.eq
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X s ^ n) :=
φ.commute_X s |>.pow_right _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} {s : σ} {n : ℕ} : X s ^ n * φ = φ * X s ^ n :=
φ.commute_X_pow s n |>.symm.eq
theorem X_def (s : σ) : X s = monomial R (single s 1) 1 :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq (s : σ) (n : ℕ) : (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n = monomial R (single s n) 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ih, Finsupp.single_add, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R m ((X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n) = if m = single s n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq s n, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (φ * C σ R a) = coeff R n φ * a := by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ a
theorem coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ * X s) = 0 := by
have : ¬single s 1 ≤ 0 := fun h => by simpa using h s
simp only [X, coeff_mul_monomial, if_neg this]
theorem coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s * φ) = 0 := by
rw [← (φ.commute_X s).eq, coeff_zero_mul_X]
variable (σ) (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : MvPowerSeries σ R →+* R :=
{ coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) with
toFun := coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)
map_one' := coeff_zero_one
map_mul' := fun φ ψ => by classical simp [coeff_mul, support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := LinearMap.map_zero _ }
variable {σ} {R}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = constantCoeff σ R :=
rfl
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) φ = constantCoeff σ R φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (a : R) : constantCoeff σ R (C σ R a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : (constantCoeff σ R).comp (C σ R) = RingHom.id R :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_zero : constantCoeff σ R 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_one : constantCoeff σ R 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (s : σ) : constantCoeff σ R (X s) = 0 :=
coeff_zero_X s
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S]
(φ : MvPowerSeries σ S) (a : R) :
constantCoeff σ S (a • φ) = a • constantCoeff σ S φ := rfl
/-- If a multivariate formal power series is invertible,
then so is its constant coefficient. -/
theorem isUnit_constantCoeff (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (h : IsUnit φ) :
IsUnit (constantCoeff σ R φ) :=
h.map _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (n) (a : R) : coeff _ n (a • f) = a * coeff _ n f :=
rfl
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) : a • f = C σ R a * f := by
ext
simp
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] {s t : σ} : (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = X t ↔ s = t :=
⟨by
classical
intro h
replace h := congr_arg (coeff R (single s 1)) h
rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl, coeff_X] at h
split_ifs at h with H
· rw [Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff] at H
rcases H with H | H
· exact H.1
· exfalso
exact one_ne_zero H.1
· exfalso
exact one_ne_zero h, congr_arg X⟩
end Semiring
section Map
variable {S T : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
variable (σ) in
/-- The map between multivariate formal power series induced by a map on the coefficients. -/
def map : MvPowerSeries σ R →+* MvPowerSeries σ S where
toFun φ n := f <| coeff R n φ
map_zero' := ext fun _n => f.map_zero
map_one' :=
ext fun n =>
show f ((coeff R n) 1) = (coeff S n) 1 by
classical
rw [coeff_one, coeff_one]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [ite_true, map_one, h]
· simp only [ite_false, map_zero, h]
map_add' φ ψ :=
ext fun n => show f ((coeff R n) (φ + ψ)) = f ((coeff R n) φ) + f ((coeff R n) ψ) by simp
map_mul' φ ψ :=
ext fun n =>
show f _ = _ by
classical
rw [coeff_mul, map_sum, coeff_mul]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ _; rw [f.map_mul]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map σ (RingHom.id R) = RingHom.id _ :=
rfl
theorem map_comp : map σ (g.comp f) = (map σ g).comp (map σ f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_map (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : coeff S n (map σ f φ) = f (coeff R n φ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_map (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
constantCoeff σ S (map σ f φ) = f (constantCoeff σ R φ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : map σ f (monomial R n a) = monomial S n (f a) := by
classical
ext m
simp [coeff_monomial, apply_ite f]
@[simp]
theorem map_C (a : R) : map σ f (C σ R a) = C σ S (f a) :=
map_monomial _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem map_X (s : σ) : map σ f (X s) = X s := by simp [MvPowerSeries.X]
end Map
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero {S : Type*} [DivisionSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S]
(φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (f : R →+* S) : φ.map σ f = 0 ↔ φ = 0 := by
simp only [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff]
congr! with n
simp
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem X_pow_dvd_iff {s : σ} {n : ℕ} {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
(X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m s < n → coeff R m φ = 0 := by
classical
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ m h
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul]
contrapose! h
dsimp at h
subst i
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hij
rw [← hij, Finsupp.add_apply, Finsupp.single_eq_same]
exact Nat.le_add_right n _
· intro h
refine ⟨fun m => coeff R (m + single s n) φ, ?_⟩
ext m
by_cases H : m - single s n + single s n = m
· rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (single s n, m - single s n)]
· rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, one_mul]
simpa using congr_arg (fun m : σ →₀ ℕ => coeff R m φ) H.symm
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij hne
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hij
rw [coeff_X_pow]
split_ifs with hi
· exfalso
apply hne
rw [← hij, ← hi, Prod.mk_inj]
refine ⟨rfl, ?_⟩
ext t
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_left, Finsupp.add_apply, Finsupp.tsub_apply]
· exact zero_mul _
· intro hni
exfalso
apply hni
rwa [mem_antidiagonal, add_comm]
· rw [h, coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hij
rw [coeff_X_pow]
split_ifs with hi
· exfalso
apply H
rw [← hij, hi]
ext
rw [coe_add, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, add_tsub_cancel_left, add_comm]
· exact zero_mul _
· contrapose! H
ext t
by_cases hst : s = t
· subst t
simpa using tsub_add_cancel_of_le H
· simp [Finsupp.single_apply, hst]
theorem X_dvd_iff {s : σ} {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
(X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m s = 0 → coeff R m φ = 0 := by
rw [← pow_one (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R), X_pow_dvd_iff]
constructor <;> intro h m hm
· exact h m (hm.symm ▸ zero_lt_one)
· exact h m (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hm)
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
open Finset.HasAntidiagonal Finset
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Coefficients of a product of power series -/
theorem coeff_prod [DecidableEq σ]
(f : ι → MvPowerSeries σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : Finset ι) :
coeff R d (∏ j ∈ s, f j) =
∑ l ∈ finsuppAntidiag s d,
∏ i ∈ s, coeff R (l i) (f i) := by
induction s using Finset.induction_on generalizing d with
| empty =>
simp only [prod_empty, sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_one, coeff_one, finsuppAntidiag_empty]
split_ifs
· simp only [card_singleton, Nat.cast_one]
· simp only [card_empty, Nat.cast_zero]
| insert a s ha ih =>
rw [finsuppAntidiag_insert ha, prod_insert ha, coeff_mul, sum_biUnion]
· apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
simp only [mem_antidiagonal, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, coe_update, Prod.forall]
rintro u v rfl
rw [ih, Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_attach]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
simp only [mem_attach, Finset.prod_insert ha, Function.update_self, forall_true_left,
Subtype.forall]
rintro x -
rw [Finset.prod_congr rfl]
intro i hi
rw [Function.update_of_ne]
exact ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi ha
· simp only [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, mem_coe, mem_antidiagonal, ne_eq,
disjoint_left, mem_map, mem_attach, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, true_and, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂,
Prod.forall, Prod.mk.injEq]
rintro u v rfl u' v' huv h k - l - hkl
obtain rfl : u' = u := by
simpa only [Finsupp.coe_update, Function.update_self] using DFunLike.congr_fun hkl a
simp only [add_right_inj] at huv
exact h rfl huv.symm
/-- The `d`th coefficient of a power of a multivariate power series
is the sum, indexed by `finsuppAntidiag (Finset.range n) d`, of products of coefficients -/
theorem coeff_pow [DecidableEq σ] (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) {n : ℕ} (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff R d (f ^ n) =
∑ l ∈ finsuppAntidiag (Finset.range n) d,
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, coeff R (l i) f := by
suffices f ^ n = (Finset.range n).prod fun _ ↦ f by
rw [this, coeff_prod]
rw [Finset.prod_const, card_range]
/-- Vanishing of coefficients of powers of multivariate power series
when the constant coefficient is nilpotent
[N. Bourbaki, *Algebra {II}*, Chapter 4, §4, n°2, proposition 3][bourbaki1981] -/
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_nilpotent {f : MvPowerSeries σ R} {m : ℕ}
(hf : constantCoeff σ R f ^ m = 0) {d : σ →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (hn : m + degree d ≤ n) :
coeff R d (f ^ n) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coeff_pow]
apply sum_eq_zero
intro k hk
rw [mem_finsuppAntidiag] at hk
set s := {i ∈ range n | k i = 0} with hs_def
have hs : s ⊆ range n := filter_subset _ _
have hs' (i : ℕ) (hi : i ∈ s) : coeff R (k i) f = constantCoeff σ R f := by
simp only [hs_def, mem_filter] at hi
rw [hi.2, coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
have hs'' (i : ℕ) (hi : i ∈ s) : k i = 0 := by
simp only [hs_def, mem_filter] at hi
rw [hi.2]
rw [← prod_sdiff (s₁ := s) (filter_subset _ _)]
apply mul_eq_zero_of_right
rw [prod_congr rfl hs', prod_const]
suffices m ≤ #s by
obtain ⟨m', hm'⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le this
rw [hm', pow_add, hf, MulZeroClass.zero_mul]
rw [← Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, add_comm #s,
Finset.card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card (filter_subset _ _), card_range]
apply le_trans _ hn
simp only [add_comm m, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← hk.1,
← sum_sdiff (hs), sum_eq_zero (s := s) hs'', add_zero]
rw [← hs_def]
convert Finset.card_nsmul_le_sum (range n \ s) (fun x ↦ degree (k x)) 1 _
· simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
· simp only [degree_eq_weight_one, map_sum]
· simp only [hs_def, mem_filter, mem_sdiff, mem_range, not_and, and_imp]
intro i hi hi'
rw [← not_lt, Nat.lt_one_iff, degree_eq_zero_iff]
exact hi' hi
end CommSemiring
section Algebra
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
{B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
instance : Algebra R (MvPowerSeries σ A) where
algebraMap := (MvPowerSeries.map σ (algebraMap R A)).comp (C σ R)
commutes' := fun a φ => by
ext n
simp [Algebra.commutes]
smul_def' := fun a σ => by
ext n
simp [(coeff A n).map_smul_of_tower a, Algebra.smul_def]
theorem c_eq_algebraMap : C σ R = algebraMap R (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_apply {r : R} :
algebraMap R (MvPowerSeries σ A) r = C σ A (algebraMap R A r) := by
change (MvPowerSeries.map σ (algebraMap R A)).comp (C σ R) r = _
simp
/-- Change of coefficients in mv power series, as an `AlgHom` -/
def mapAlgHom (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) :
MvPowerSeries σ A →ₐ[R] MvPowerSeries σ B where
toRingHom := MvPowerSeries.map σ φ
commutes' r := by
simp only [RingHom.toMonoidHom_eq_coe, OneHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe,
MonoidHom.coe_coe, MvPowerSeries.algebraMap_apply, map_C, RingHom.coe_coe, AlgHom.commutes]
theorem mapAlgHom_apply (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) (f : MvPowerSeries σ A) :
mapAlgHom (σ := σ) φ f = MvPowerSeries.map σ φ f := rfl
instance [Nonempty σ] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (Subalgebra R (MvPowerSeries σ R)) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, by
classical
rw [Ne, SetLike.ext_iff, not_forall]
inhabit σ
refine ⟨X default, ?_⟩
simp only [Algebra.mem_bot, not_exists, Set.mem_range, iff_true, Algebra.mem_top]
intro x
rw [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff, not_forall]
refine ⟨Finsupp.single default 1, ?_⟩
simp [algebraMap_apply, coeff_C]⟩⟩
end Algebra
end MvPowerSeries
namespace MvPolynomial
open Finsupp
variable {σ : Type*} {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R)
-- Porting note: added so we can add the `@[coe]` attribute
/-- The natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials into multivariate formal power series. -/
@[coe]
def toMvPowerSeries : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPowerSeries σ R :=
fun φ n => coeff n φ
/-- The natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials into multivariate formal power series. -/
instance coeToMvPowerSeries : Coe (MvPolynomial σ R) (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨toMvPowerSeries⟩
theorem coe_def : (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) = fun n => coeff n φ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeff_coe (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries.coeff R n ↑φ = coeff n φ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
(monomial n a : MvPowerSeries σ R) = MvPowerSeries.monomial R n a :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun m => by
classical
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_monomial, MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> first |rfl|subst m; contradiction
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : MvPolynomial σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : MvPolynomial σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 1 :=
coe_monomial _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((φ + ψ : MvPolynomial σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R) = φ + ψ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ((φ * ψ : MvPolynomial σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R) = φ * ψ :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun n => by
classical
simp only [coeff_coe, MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul, coeff_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_C (a : R) : ((C a : MvPolynomial σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R) = MvPowerSeries.C σ R a :=
coe_monomial _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_X (s : σ) : ((X s : MvPolynomial σ R) : MvPowerSeries σ R) = MvPowerSeries.X s :=
coe_monomial _ _
variable (σ R)
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (Coe.coe : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
fun x y h => by
ext
simp_rw [← coeff_coe]
congr
variable {σ R φ ψ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) = ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
(coe_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff : (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 ↔ φ = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, coe_inj]
| @[simp]
theorem coe_eq_one_iff : (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 1 ↔ φ = 1 := by rw [← coe_one, coe_inj]
/-- The coercion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate power series
as a ring homomorphism.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 852 | 856 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.IntegralCompProd
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.StandardBorel
/-!
# Lebesgue and Bochner integrals of conditional kernels
Integrals of `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel` and `MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_condKernel`: the integral
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)` is equal to
`∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a)`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.setIntegral_condKernel`:
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ`
Corresponding statements for the Lebesgue integral and/or without the sets `s` and `t` are also
provided.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β Ω : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem (a : α) {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x) (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
simp_rw [Kernel.compProd_apply hs]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : κ a (s ×ˢ t) = (Kernel.fst κ ⊗ₖ Kernel.condKernel κ) a (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (κ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, Kernel.compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s ×ˢ t}
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [Set.preimage, this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ hf]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.setLIntegral_compProd _ _ _ hf hs ht]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a hs MeasurableSet.univ]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a MeasurableSet.univ ht]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Lintegral
| section Integral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{E : Type*} {f : β × Ω → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Integral.lean | 85 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Order.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Basic
/-!
# Denumerable types
This file defines denumerable (countably infinite) types as a typeclass extending `Encodable`. This
is used to provide explicit encode/decode functions from and to `ℕ`, with the information that those
functions are inverses of each other.
## Implementation notes
This property already has a name, namely `α ≃ ℕ`, but here we are interested in using it as a
typeclass.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A denumerable type is (constructively) bijective with `ℕ`. Typeclass equivalent of `α ≃ ℕ`. -/
class Denumerable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
/-- `decode` and `encode` are inverses. -/
decode_inv : ∀ n, ∃ a ∈ decode n, encode a = n
open Finset Nat
namespace Denumerable
section
variable [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β]
open Encodable
theorem decode_isSome (α) [Denumerable α] (n : ℕ) : (decode (α := α) n).isSome :=
Option.isSome_iff_exists.2 <| (decode_inv n).imp fun _ => And.left
/-- Returns the `n`-th element of `α` indexed by the decoding. -/
def ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] (n : ℕ) : α :=
Option.get _ (decode_isSome α n)
@[simp]
theorem decode_eq_ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] (n : ℕ) : decode (α := α) n = some (ofNat α n) :=
Option.eq_some_of_isSome _
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_of_decode {n b} (h : decode (α := α) n = some b) : ofNat (α := α) n = b :=
Option.some.inj <| (decode_eq_ofNat _ _).symm.trans h
@[simp]
theorem encode_ofNat (n) : encode (ofNat α n) = n := by
obtain ⟨a, h, e⟩ := decode_inv (α := α) n
rwa [ofNat_of_decode h]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_encode (a) : ofNat α (encode a) = a :=
ofNat_of_decode (encodek _)
/-- A denumerable type is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def eqv (α) [Denumerable α] : α ≃ ℕ :=
⟨encode, ofNat α, ofNat_encode, encode_ofNat⟩
-- See Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) : Infinite α :=
Infinite.of_surjective _ (eqv α).surjective
/-- A type equivalent to `ℕ` is denumerable. -/
def mk' {α} (e : α ≃ ℕ) : Denumerable α where
encode := e
decode := some ∘ e.symm
encodek _ := congr_arg some (e.symm_apply_apply _)
decode_inv _ := ⟨_, rfl, e.apply_symm_apply _⟩
/-- Denumerability is conserved by equivalences. This is transitivity of equivalence the denumerable
way. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Denumerable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Denumerable β :=
{ Encodable.ofEquiv _ e with
decode_inv := fun n => by
simp [decode_ofEquiv, encode_ofEquiv] }
@[simp]
theorem ofEquiv_ofNat (α) {β} [Denumerable α] (e : β ≃ α) (n) :
@ofNat β (ofEquiv _ e) n = e.symm (ofNat α n) := by
letI := ofEquiv _ e
refine ofNat_of_decode ?_
rw [decode_ofEquiv e]
simp
/-- All denumerable types are equivalent. -/
def equiv₂ (α β) [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β] : α ≃ β :=
(eqv α).trans (eqv β).symm
instance nat : Denumerable ℕ :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_nat (n) : ofNat ℕ n = n :=
rfl
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then so is `Option α`. -/
instance option : Denumerable (Option α) :=
⟨fun n => by
cases n with
| zero =>
refine ⟨none, ?_, encode_none⟩
rw [decode_option_zero, Option.mem_def]
| succ n =>
refine ⟨some (ofNat α n), ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [decode_option_succ, decode_eq_ofNat, Option.map_some', Option.mem_def]
rw [encode_some, encode_ofNat]⟩
/-- If `α` and `β` are denumerable, then so is their sum. -/
instance sum : Denumerable (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨fun n => by
suffices ∃ a ∈ @decodeSum α β _ _ n, encodeSum a = bit (bodd n) (div2 n) by simpa [bit_decomp]
simp only [decodeSum, boddDiv2_eq, decode_eq_ofNat, Option.some.injEq, Option.map_some',
Option.mem_def, Sum.exists]
cases bodd n <;> simp [decodeSum, bit, encodeSum, Nat.two_mul]⟩
section Sigma
variable {γ : α → Type*} [∀ a, Denumerable (γ a)]
/-- A denumerable collection of denumerable types is denumerable. -/
instance sigma : Denumerable (Sigma γ) :=
⟨fun n => by simp [decodeSigma]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sigma_ofNat_val (n : ℕ) :
ofNat (Sigma γ) n = ⟨ofNat α (unpair n).1, ofNat (γ _) (unpair n).2⟩ :=
Option.some.inj <| by rw [← decode_eq_ofNat, decode_sigma_val]; simp
end Sigma
/-- If `α` and `β` are denumerable, then so is their product. -/
instance prod : Denumerable (α × β) :=
ofEquiv _ (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd α β).symm
theorem prod_ofNat_val (n : ℕ) :
ofNat (α × β) n = (ofNat α (unpair n).1, ofNat β (unpair n).2) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_nat_ofNat : ofNat (ℕ × ℕ) = unpair := by funext; simp
instance int : Denumerable ℤ :=
Denumerable.mk' Equiv.intEquivNat
instance pnat : Denumerable ℕ+ :=
Denumerable.mk' Equiv.pnatEquivNat
/-- The lift of a denumerable type is denumerable. -/
instance ulift : Denumerable (ULift α) :=
ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift
/-- The lift of a denumerable type is denumerable. -/
instance plift : Denumerable (PLift α) :=
ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift
/-- If `α` is denumerable, then `α × α` and `α` are equivalent. -/
def pair : α × α ≃ α :=
equiv₂ _ _
end
end Denumerable
namespace Nat.Subtype
open Function Encodable
/-! ### Subsets of `ℕ` -/
variable {s : Set ℕ} [Infinite s]
section Classical
theorem exists_succ (x : s) : ∃ n, (x : ℕ) + n + 1 ∈ s := by
by_contra h
have (a : ℕ) (ha : a ∈ s) : a < x + 1 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hax => h ⟨a - (x + 1), by rwa [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_sub_cancel' hax]⟩
classical
exact Fintype.false
⟨(((Multiset.range (succ x)).filter (· ∈ s)).pmap
(fun (y : ℕ) (hy : y ∈ s) => Subtype.mk y hy) (by simp [-Multiset.range_succ])).toFinset,
by simpa [Subtype.ext_iff_val, Multiset.mem_filter, -Multiset.range_succ] ⟩
end Classical
variable [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
/-- Returns the next natural in a set, according to the usual ordering of `ℕ`. -/
def succ (x : s) : s :=
have h : ∃ m, (x : ℕ) + m + 1 ∈ s := exists_succ x
⟨↑x + Nat.find h + 1, Nat.find_spec h⟩
theorem succ_le_of_lt {x y : s} (h : y < x) : succ y ≤ x :=
have hx : ∃ m, (y : ℕ) + m + 1 ∈ s := exists_succ _
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt h
have : Nat.find hx ≤ k := Nat.find_min' _ (hk ▸ x.2)
show (y : ℕ) + Nat.find hx + 1 ≤ x by omega
theorem le_succ_of_forall_lt_le {x y : s} (h : ∀ z < x, z ≤ y) : x ≤ succ y :=
have hx : ∃ m, (y : ℕ) + m + 1 ∈ s := exists_succ _
show (x : ℕ) ≤ (y : ℕ) + Nat.find hx + 1 from
le_of_not_gt fun hxy =>
(h ⟨_, Nat.find_spec hx⟩ hxy).not_lt <|
(by omega : (y : ℕ) < (y : ℕ) + Nat.find hx + 1)
theorem lt_succ_self (x : s) : x < succ x :=
calc
(x : ℕ) ≤ (x + _) := le_add_right ..
_ < (succ x) := Nat.lt_succ_self (x + _)
theorem lt_succ_iff_le {x y : s} : x < succ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
⟨fun h => le_of_not_gt fun h' => not_le_of_gt h (succ_le_of_lt h'), fun h =>
lt_of_le_of_lt h (lt_succ_self _)⟩
/-- Returns the `n`-th element of a set, according to the usual ordering of `ℕ`. -/
def ofNat (s : Set ℕ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [Infinite s] : ℕ → s
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => succ (ofNat s n)
theorem ofNat_surjective : Surjective (ofNat s)
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => by
set t : List s :=
((List.range x).filter fun y => y ∈ s).pmap
(fun (y : ℕ) (hy : y ∈ s) => ⟨y, hy⟩)
(by intros a ha; simpa using (List.mem_filter.mp ha).2) with ht
have hmt : ∀ {y : s}, y ∈ t ↔ y < ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
simp [List.mem_filter, Subtype.ext_iff_val, ht]
cases hmax : List.maximum t with
| bot =>
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm bot_le (le_of_not_gt fun h => List.not_mem_nil (a := (⊥ : s)) ?_)⟩
rwa [← List.maximum_eq_bot.1 hmax, hmt]
| coe m =>
have wf : ↑m < x := by simpa using hmt.mp (List.maximum_mem hmax)
rcases ofNat_surjective m with ⟨a, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a + 1, le_antisymm (succ_le_of_lt wf) ?_⟩
exact le_succ_of_forall_lt_le fun z hz => List.le_maximum_of_mem (hmt.2 hz) hmax
termination_by n => n.val
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_range : Set.range (ofNat s) = Set.univ :=
ofNat_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_ofNat_range : Set.range ((↑) ∘ ofNat s : ℕ → ℕ) = s := by
rw [Set.range_comp Subtype.val, ofNat_range, Set.image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
private def toFunAux (x : s) : ℕ :=
(List.range x).countP (· ∈ s)
private theorem toFunAux_eq {s : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (x : s) :
toFunAux x = #{y ∈ Finset.range x | y ∈ s} := by
rw [toFunAux, List.countP_eq_length_filter]
rfl
open Finset
private theorem right_inverse_aux : ∀ n, toFunAux (ofNat s n) = n
| 0 => by
rw [toFunAux_eq, card_eq_zero, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
rintro n hn
rw [mem_filter, ofNat, mem_range] at hn
exact bot_le.not_lt (show (⟨n, hn.2⟩ : s) < ⊥ from hn.1)
| n + 1 => by
have ih : toFunAux (ofNat s n) = n := right_inverse_aux n
| have h₁ : (ofNat s n : ℕ) ∉ {x ∈ range (ofNat s n) | x ∈ s} := by simp
have h₂ : {x ∈ range (succ (ofNat s n)) | x ∈ s} =
insert ↑(ofNat s n) {x ∈ range (ofNat s n) | x ∈ s} := by
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, mem_insert, mem_range, mem_filter]
exact fun m =>
⟨fun h => by
simp only [h.2, and_true]
exact Or.symm (lt_or_eq_of_le ((@lt_succ_iff_le _ _ _ ⟨m, h.2⟩ _).1 h.1)),
fun h =>
h.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨lt_succ_self _, (ofNat s n).prop⟩) fun h =>
⟨h.1.trans (lt_succ_self _), h.2⟩⟩
simp only [toFunAux_eq, ofNat, range_succ] at ih ⊢
conv =>
rhs
rw [← ih, ← card_insert_of_not_mem h₁, ← h₂]
/-- Any infinite set of naturals is denumerable. -/
def denumerable (s : Set ℕ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [Infinite s] : Denumerable s :=
Denumerable.ofEquiv ℕ
{ toFun := toFunAux
invFun := ofNat s
left_inv := leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse ofNat_surjective right_inverse_aux
right_inv := right_inverse_aux }
| Mathlib/Logic/Denumerable.lean | 276 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| | ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 389 | 392 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Matrices as a normed space
In this file we provide the following non-instances for norms on matrices:
* The elementwise norm:
* `Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.normedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.normedSpace`
* `Matrix.isBoundedSMul`
* The Frobenius norm:
* `Matrix.frobeniusSeminormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedSpace`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedRing`
* `Matrix.frobeniusNormedAlgebra`
* `Matrix.frobeniusIsBoundedSMul`
* The $L^\infty$ operator norm:
* `Matrix.linftyOpSeminormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedAddCommGroup`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedSpace`
* `Matrix.linftyOpIsBoundedSMul`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpSemiNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedRing`
* `Matrix.linftyOpNormedAlgebra`
These are not declared as instances because there are several natural choices for defining the norm
of a matrix.
The norm induced by the identification of `Matrix m n 𝕜` with
`EuclideanSpace n 𝕜 →L[𝕜] EuclideanSpace m 𝕜` (i.e., the ℓ² operator norm) can be found in
`Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Matrix`. It is separated to avoid extraneous imports in this file.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {R l m n α β ι : Type*} [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [Unique ι]
/-! ### The elementwise supremum norm -/
section LinfLinf
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Seminormed group instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a seminormed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
protected def seminormedAddCommGroup : SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.seminormedAddCommGroup
attribute [local instance] Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup
theorem norm_def (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖A‖ = ‖fun i j => A i j‖ := rfl
/-- The norm of a matrix is the sup of the sup of the nnnorm of the entries -/
lemma norm_eq_sup_sup_nnnorm (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = Finset.sup Finset.univ fun i ↦ Finset.sup Finset.univ fun j ↦ ‖A i j‖₊ := by
simp_rw [Matrix.norm_def, Pi.norm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
theorem nnnorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖A‖₊ = ‖fun i j => A i j‖₊ := rfl
theorem norm_le_iff {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) {A : Matrix m n α} : ‖A‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖ ≤ r := by
simp_rw [norm_def, pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg hr]
theorem nnnorm_le_iff {r : ℝ≥0} {A : Matrix m n α} : ‖A‖₊ ≤ r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖₊ ≤ r := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_def, pi_nnnorm_le_iff]
theorem norm_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {A : Matrix m n α} : ‖A‖ < r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖ < r := by
simp_rw [norm_def, pi_norm_lt_iff hr]
theorem nnnorm_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : 0 < r) {A : Matrix m n α} :
‖A‖₊ < r ↔ ∀ i j, ‖A i j‖₊ < r := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_def, pi_nnnorm_lt_iff hr]
theorem norm_entry_le_entrywise_sup_norm (A : Matrix m n α) {i : m} {j : n} : ‖A i j‖ ≤ ‖A‖ :=
(norm_le_pi_norm (A i) j).trans (norm_le_pi_norm A i)
theorem nnnorm_entry_le_entrywise_sup_nnnorm (A : Matrix m n α) {i : m} {j : n} : ‖A i j‖₊ ≤ ‖A‖₊ :=
(nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm (A i) j).trans (nnnorm_le_pi_nnnorm A i)
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊) :
‖A.map f‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by
simp only [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def, Matrix.map_apply, hf]
@[simp]
theorem norm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖ = ‖a‖) : ‖A.map f‖ = ‖A‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_map_eq A f fun a => Subtype.ext <| hf a :)
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
Finset.sup_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem norm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_transpose A
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
(nnnorm_map_eq _ _ nnnorm_star).trans A.nnnorm_transpose
@[simp]
theorem norm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᴴ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_conjTranspose A
instance [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] : NormedStarGroup (Matrix m m α) :=
⟨(le_of_eq <| norm_conjTranspose ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
simp [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias nnnorm_col := nnnorm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem norm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_replicateCol v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias norm_col := norm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
simp [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias nnnorm_row := nnnorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem norm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_replicateRow v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias norm_row := norm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_diagonal [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) : ‖diagonal v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
simp_rw [nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr 1 with i : 1
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun j hj => ?_) ?_
· obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij, nnnorm_zero]
exact zero_le _
· refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_univ i))
rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
@[simp]
theorem norm_diagonal [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) : ‖diagonal v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| nnnorm_diagonal v
/-- Note this is safe as an instance as it carries no data. -/
-- Porting note: not yet implemented: `@[nolint fails_quickly]`
instance [Nonempty n] [DecidableEq n] [One α] [NormOneClass α] : NormOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨(norm_diagonal _).trans <| norm_one⟩
end SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed group instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a normed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
protected def normedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] : NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.normedAddCommGroup
section NormedSpace
attribute [local instance] Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup
/-- This applies to the sup norm of sup norm. -/
protected theorem isBoundedSMul [SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α]
[IsBoundedSMul R α] : IsBoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.instIsBoundedSMul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] protected alias boundedSMul := Matrix.isBoundedSMul
variable [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α]
/-- Normed space instance (using sup norm of sup norm) for matrices over a normed space. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
protected def normedSpace : NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
Pi.normedSpace
end NormedSpace
end LinfLinf
/-! ### The $L_\infty$ operator norm
This section defines the matrix norm $\|A\|_\infty = \operatorname{sup}_i (\sum_j \|A_{ij}\|)$.
Note that this is equivalent to the operator norm, considering $A$ as a linear map between two
$L^\infty$ spaces.
-/
section LinftyOp
/-- Seminormed group instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a seminormed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpSeminormedAddCommGroup [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : SeminormedAddCommGroup (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
/-- Normed group instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] :
NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedAddCommGroup (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
/-- This applies to the sup norm of L1 norm. -/
@[local instance]
protected theorem linftyOpIsBoundedSMul
[SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α] [IsBoundedSMul R α] :
IsBoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : IsBoundedSMul R (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
/-- Normed space instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed space. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedSpace [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α] :
NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedSpace R (m → PiLp 1 fun j : n => α))
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α]
theorem linfty_opNorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = ((Finset.univ : Finset m).sup fun i : m => ∑ j : n, ‖A i j‖₊ : ℝ≥0) := by
-- Porting note: added
change ‖fun i => (WithLp.equiv 1 _).symm (A i)‖ = _
simp [Pi.norm_def, PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L1]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = (Finset.univ : Finset m).sup fun i : m => ∑ j : n, ‖A i j‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| linfty_opNorm_def A
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNNNorm_col := linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNorm_replicateCol (v : m → α) : ‖replicateCol ι v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNorm_col := linfty_opNorm_replicateCol
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖₊ = ∑ i, ‖v i‖₊ := by
simp [linfty_opNNNorm_def]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNNNorm_row := linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNorm_replicateRow (v : n → α) : ‖replicateRow ι v‖ = ∑ i, ‖v i‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow v).trans <| by simp [NNReal.coe_sum]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias linfty_opNorm_row := linfty_opNNNorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (v : m → α) : ‖diagonal v‖₊ = ‖v‖₊ := by
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr 1 with i : 1
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.mem_univ i) fun j _hj hij => ?_).trans ?_
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne' _ hij, nnnorm_zero]
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq]
@[simp]
theorem linfty_opNorm_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (v : m → α) : ‖diagonal v‖ = ‖v‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| linfty_opNNNorm_diagonal v
end SeminormedAddCommGroup
section NonUnitalSeminormedRing
variable [NonUnitalSeminormedRing α]
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_mul (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix m n α) : ‖A * B‖₊ ≤ ‖A‖₊ * ‖B‖₊ := by
simp_rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def, Matrix.mul_apply]
calc
(Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ k, ‖∑ j, A i j * B j k‖₊) ≤
Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ k, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ * ‖B j k‖₊ :=
Finset.sup_mono_fun fun i _hi =>
Finset.sum_le_sum fun k _hk => nnnorm_sum_le_of_le _ fun j _hj => nnnorm_mul_le _ _
_ = Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ * ∑ k, ‖B j k‖₊ := by
simp_rw [@Finset.sum_comm m, Finset.mul_sum]
_ ≤ Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ * Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖B i j‖₊ := by
refine Finset.sup_mono_fun fun i _hi => ?_
gcongr with j hj
exact Finset.le_sup (f := fun i ↦ ∑ k : n, ‖B i k‖₊) hj
_ ≤ (Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊) * Finset.univ.sup fun i => ∑ j, ‖B i j‖₊ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.sum_mul, ← NNReal.finset_sup_mul]
rfl
theorem linfty_opNorm_mul (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix m n α) : ‖A * B‖ ≤ ‖A‖ * ‖B‖ :=
linfty_opNNNorm_mul _ _
theorem linfty_opNNNorm_mulVec (A : Matrix l m α) (v : m → α) : ‖A *ᵥ v‖₊ ≤ ‖A‖₊ * ‖v‖₊ := by
rw [← linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol (ι := Fin 1) (A *ᵥ v),
← linfty_opNNNorm_replicateCol v (ι := Fin 1)]
exact linfty_opNNNorm_mul A (replicateCol (Fin 1) v)
theorem linfty_opNorm_mulVec (A : Matrix l m α) (v : m → α) : ‖A *ᵥ v‖ ≤ ‖A‖ * ‖v‖ :=
linfty_opNNNorm_mulVec _ _
end NonUnitalSeminormedRing
/-- Seminormed non-unital ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a semi normed
non-unital ring. Not declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining
the norm of a matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing [NonUnitalSeminormedRing α] :
NonUnitalSeminormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpSeminormedAddCommGroup, Matrix.instNonUnitalRing with
norm_mul_le := linfty_opNorm_mul }
/-- The `L₁-L∞` norm preserves one on non-empty matrices. Note this is safe as an instance, as it
carries no data. -/
instance linfty_opNormOneClass [SeminormedRing α] [NormOneClass α] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] :
NormOneClass (Matrix n n α) where norm_one := (linfty_opNorm_diagonal _).trans norm_one
/-- Seminormed ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a semi normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpSemiNormedRing [SeminormedRing α] [DecidableEq n] :
SeminormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing, Matrix.instRing with }
/-- Normed non-unital ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed
non-unital ring. Not declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining
the norm of a matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNonUnitalNormedRing [NonUnitalNormedRing α] :
NonUnitalNormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpNonUnitalSemiNormedRing with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
/-- Normed ring instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed ring. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedRing [NormedRing α] [DecidableEq n] : NormedRing (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpSemiNormedRing with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
/-- Normed algebra instance (using sup norm of L1 norm) for matrices over a normed algebra. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
protected def linftyOpNormedAlgebra [NormedField R] [SeminormedRing α] [NormedAlgebra R α]
[DecidableEq n] : NormedAlgebra R (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.linftyOpNormedSpace, Matrix.instAlgebra with }
section
variable [NormedDivisionRing α] [NormedAlgebra ℝ α]
/-- Auxiliary construction; an element of norm 1 such that `a * unitOf a = ‖a‖`. -/
private def unitOf (a : α) : α := by classical exact if a = 0 then 1 else ‖a‖ • a⁻¹
private theorem norm_unitOf (a : α) : ‖unitOf a‖₊ = 1 := by
rw [unitOf]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· rw [← nnnorm_eq_zero] at h
rw [nnnorm_smul, nnnorm_inv, nnnorm_norm, mul_inv_cancel₀ h]
private theorem mul_unitOf (a : α) : a * unitOf a = algebraMap _ _ (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) := by
simp only [unitOf, coe_nnnorm]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
end
/-!
For a matrix over a field, the norm defined in this section agrees with the operator norm on
`ContinuousLinearMap`s between function types (which have the infinity norm).
-/
section
variable [NontriviallyNormedField α] [NormedAlgebra ℝ α]
lemma linfty_opNNNorm_eq_opNNNorm (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = ‖ContinuousLinearMap.mk (Matrix.mulVecLin A)‖₊ := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.opNNNorm_eq_of_bounds _ (linfty_opNNNorm_mulVec _) fun N hN => ?_]
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_def]
refine Finset.sup_le fun i _ => ?_
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· simp
classical
let x : n → α := fun j => unitOf (A i j)
have hxn : ‖x‖₊ = 1 := by
simp_rw [x, Pi.nnnorm_def, norm_unitOf, Finset.sup_const Finset.univ_nonempty]
specialize hN x
rw [hxn, mul_one, Pi.nnnorm_def, Finset.sup_le_iff] at hN
replace hN := hN i (Finset.mem_univ _)
dsimp [mulVec, dotProduct] at hN
simp_rw [x, mul_unitOf, ← map_sum, nnnorm_algebraMap, ← NNReal.coe_sum, NNReal.nnnorm_eq,
nnnorm_one, mul_one] at hN
exact hN
lemma linfty_opNorm_eq_opNorm (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = ‖ContinuousLinearMap.mk (Matrix.mulVecLin A)‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (linfty_opNNNorm_eq_opNNNorm A)
variable [DecidableEq n]
@[simp] lemma linfty_opNNNorm_toMatrix (f : (n → α) →L[α] (m → α)) :
‖LinearMap.toMatrix' (↑f : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (m → α))‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ := by
rw [linfty_opNNNorm_eq_opNNNorm]
simp only [← toLin'_apply', toLin'_toMatrix']
@[simp] lemma linfty_opNorm_toMatrix (f : (n → α) →L[α] (m → α)) :
‖LinearMap.toMatrix' (↑f : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (m → α))‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (linfty_opNNNorm_toMatrix f)
end
end LinftyOp
/-! ### The Frobenius norm
This is defined as $\|A\| = \sqrt{\sum_{i,j} \|A_{ij}\|^2}$.
When the matrix is over the real or complex numbers, this norm is submultiplicative.
-/
section frobenius
open scoped Matrix
/-- Seminormed group instance (using frobenius norm) for matrices over a seminormed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
def frobeniusSeminormedAddCommGroup [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
inferInstanceAs (SeminormedAddCommGroup (PiLp 2 fun _i : m => PiLp 2 fun _j : n => α))
/-- Normed group instance (using frobenius norm) for matrices over a normed group. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
def frobeniusNormedAddCommGroup [NormedAddCommGroup α] : NormedAddCommGroup (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedAddCommGroup (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
/-- This applies to the frobenius norm. -/
@[local instance]
theorem frobeniusIsBoundedSMul [SeminormedRing R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [Module R α]
[IsBoundedSMul R α] :
IsBoundedSMul R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : IsBoundedSMul R (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias frobeniusBoundedSMul := frobeniusIsBoundedSMul
/-- Normed space instance (using frobenius norm) for matrices over a normed space. Not
declared as an instance because there are several natural choices for defining the norm of a
matrix. -/
@[local instance]
def frobeniusNormedSpace [NormedField R] [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [NormedSpace R α] :
NormedSpace R (Matrix m n α) :=
(by infer_instance : NormedSpace R (PiLp 2 fun i : m => PiLp 2 fun j : n => α))
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖₊ = (∑ i, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖₊ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) := by
-- Porting note: added, along with `WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply` below
change ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm fun i => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm fun j => A i j‖₊ = _
simp_rw [PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L2, NNReal.sq_sqrt, NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow, NNReal.rpow_two,
WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
theorem frobenius_norm_def (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖A‖ = (∑ i, ∑ j, ‖A i j‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (frobenius_nnnorm_def A)).trans <| by simp [NNReal.coe_sum]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊) :
‖A.map f‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by simp_rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, Matrix.map_apply, hf]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_map_eq (A : Matrix m n α) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a, ‖f a‖ = ‖a‖) :
‖A.map f‖ = ‖A‖ :=
(congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq A f fun a => Subtype.ext <| hf a :)
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ := by
rw [frobenius_nnnorm_def, frobenius_nnnorm_def, Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [Matrix.transpose_apply]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_transpose (A : Matrix m n α) : ‖Aᵀ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_transpose A
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖₊ = ‖A‖₊ :=
(frobenius_nnnorm_map_eq _ _ nnnorm_star).trans A.frobenius_nnnorm_transpose
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] (A : Matrix m n α) :
‖Aᴴ‖ = ‖A‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) <| frobenius_nnnorm_conjTranspose A
instance frobenius_normedStarGroup [StarAddMonoid α] [NormedStarGroup α] :
NormedStarGroup (Matrix m m α) :=
⟨(le_of_eq <| frobenius_norm_conjTranspose ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_replicateRow (v : m → α) :
‖replicateRow ι v‖ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖ := by
rw [frobenius_norm_def, Fintype.sum_unique, PiLp.norm_eq_of_L2, Real.sqrt_eq_rpow]
simp only [replicateRow_apply, Real.rpow_two, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias frobenius_norm_row := frobenius_norm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_nnnorm_replicateRow (v : m → α) :
‖replicateRow ι v‖₊ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| frobenius_norm_replicateRow v
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias frobenius_nnnorm_row := frobenius_nnnorm_replicateRow
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_norm_replicateCol (v : n → α) :
| ‖replicateCol ι v‖ = ‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm v‖ := by
simp_rw [frobenius_norm_def, Fintype.sum_unique, PiLp.norm_eq_of_L2, Real.sqrt_eq_rpow]
simp only [replicateCol_apply, Real.rpow_two, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias frobenius_norm_col := frobenius_norm_replicateCol
| Mathlib/Analysis/Matrix.lean | 559 | 564 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℂ g x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivAt h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ g s x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableWithinAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℂ g s)
(h0 : Set.MapsTo f s slitPlane) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).cpow (hg x hx) (h0 hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s :=
hf.cpow (differentiableOn_const c) h0
theorem Differentiable.cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f) (hg : Differentiable ℂ g)
(h0 : ∀ x, f x ∈ slitPlane) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).cpow (hg x) (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.const_cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiable_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] :
Differentiable ℂ fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
differentiable_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiableAt_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] (t : ℂ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s) t :=
differentiableAt_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end fderiv
section deriv
open Complex
variable {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `HasFDerivAt.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `HasDerivAt.cpow`. -/
private theorem aux : ((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' := by
simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul']
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa using (hf.cpow hg h0).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h).comp x hf
theorem Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun z : ℂ => z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x := by
simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
(hasStrictDerivAt_id x).cpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x c) h
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') s x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
/-- Although `fun x => x ^ r` for fixed `r` is *not* complex-differentiable along the negative real
line, it is still real-differentiable, and the derivative is what one would formally expect.
See `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const` for an alternate formulation. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ -1) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← Ne] at hr
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hx.symm with (hx | hx)
· -- easy case : `0 < x`
apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (e := fun y => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1))
convert HasDerivAt.div_const (𝕜 := ℂ) ?_ (r + 1) using 1
· exact (mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr).symm
· convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
· -- harder case : `x < 0`
have : ∀ᶠ y : ℝ in 𝓝 x,
(y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) = (-y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) * exp (π * I * (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
refine Filter.eventually_of_mem (Iio_mem_nhds hx) fun y hy => ?_
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hy)]
refine HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hx)]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-↑y) ^ (r + 1) * exp (↑π * I * (r + 1)))
((r + 1) * (-↑x) ^ r * exp (↑π * I * r)) x by
convert this.div_const (r + 1) using 1
conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr]
rw [mul_add ((π : ℂ) * _), mul_one, exp_add, exp_pi_mul_I, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) (-1 : ℂ),
neg_one_mul]
simp_rw [mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← ofReal_neg]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (↑(-y) : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) (-(r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) x by
convert this.neg.mul_const _ using 1; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) (-x) by
convert @HasDerivAt.scomp ℝ _ ℂ _ _ x ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this (hasDerivAt_neg x) using 1
rw [real_smul, ofReal_neg 1, ofReal_one]; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) ↑(-x) by
exact this.comp_ofReal
conv in ↑_ ^ _ => rw [(by ring : r = r + 1 - 1)]
convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id ((-x : ℝ) : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-15")] alias hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow := hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'
/-- An alternate formulation of `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ r) (r * x ^ (r - 1)) x := by
have := HasDerivAt.const_mul r <| hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' hx
(by rwa [ne_eq, sub_eq_neg_self])
simpa [sub_add_cancel, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr] using this
/-- A version of `DifferentiableAt.cpow_const` for a real function. -/
theorem DifferentiableAt.ofReal_cpow_const {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h0 : f x ≠ 0) (h1 : c ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun (y : ℝ) => (f y : ℂ) ^ c) x :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const h0 h1).differentiableAt.comp x hf
theorem Complex.deriv_cpow_const (hx : x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ x ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const hx).hasDerivAt.deriv
/-- A version of `Complex.deriv_cpow_const` for a real variable. -/
theorem Complex.deriv_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x : ℂ) ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc).deriv
theorem deriv_cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hx : f x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ f x ^ c) x = c * f x ^ (c - 1) * deriv f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.cpow_const hx).deriv
|
theorem isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop {c : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =Θ[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
calc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ c * x ^ (c - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with x hx using by rw [deriv_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ ‖(x : ℂ) ^ (c - 1)‖ :=
(Asymptotics.IsTheta.of_norm_eventuallyEq EventuallyEq.rfl).const_mul_left hc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x ↦ x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx, sub_re, one_re]
theorem isBigO_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop (c : ℂ) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 289 | 301 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Preadditive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-!
# Homology of linear categories
In this file, it is shown that if `C` is a `R`-linear category, then
`ShortComplex C` is a `R`-linear category. Various homological notions
are also shown to be linear.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {R C : Type*} [Semiring R] [Category C] [Preadditive C] [Linear R C]
namespace ShortComplex
variable {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
attribute [local simp] Hom.comm₁₂ Hom.comm₂₃ mul_smul add_smul
instance : SMul R (S₁ ⟶ S₂) where
smul a φ :=
{ τ₁ := a • φ.τ₁
τ₂ := a • φ.τ₂
τ₃ := a • φ.τ₃ }
@[simp] lemma smul_τ₁ (a : R) (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (a • φ).τ₁ = a • φ.τ₁ := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_τ₂ (a : R) (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (a • φ).τ₂ = a • φ.τ₂ := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_τ₃ (a : R) (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : (a • φ).τ₃ = a • φ.τ₃ := rfl
instance : Module R (S₁ ⟶ S₂) where
zero_smul := by aesop_cat
one_smul := by aesop_cat
smul_zero := by aesop_cat
smul_add := by aesop_cat
add_smul := by aesop_cat
mul_smul := by aesop_cat
instance : Linear R (ShortComplex C) where
section LeftHomology
variable {φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable (γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
/-- Given a left homology map data for morphism `φ`, this is the induced left homology
map data for `a • φ`. -/
@[simps]
def smul (a : R) : LeftHomologyMapData (a • φ) h₁ h₂ where
φK := a • γ.φK
φH := a • γ.φH
end LeftHomologyMapData
variable (h₁ h₂ φ)
variable (a : R)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_smul :
leftHomologyMap' (a • φ) h₁ h₂ = a • leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [(γ.smul a).leftHomologyMap'_eq, LeftHomologyMapData.smul_φH, γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq]
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_smul :
cyclesMap' (a • φ) h₁ h₂ = a • cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [(γ.smul a).cyclesMap'_eq, LeftHomologyMapData.smul_φK, γ.cyclesMap'_eq]
section
variable [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_smul : leftHomologyMap (a • φ) = a • leftHomologyMap φ :=
leftHomologyMap'_smul _ _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_smul : cyclesMap (a • φ) = a • cyclesMap φ :=
cyclesMap'_smul _ _ _ _
end
instance leftHomologyFunctor_linear [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] :
Functor.Linear R (leftHomologyFunctor C) where
instance cyclesFunctor_linear [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] :
Functor.Linear R (cyclesFunctor C) where
end LeftHomology
section RightHomology
variable {φ φ' : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable (γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
/-- Given a right homology map data for morphism `φ`, this is the induced right homology
map data for `a • φ`. -/
@[simps]
def smul (a : R) : RightHomologyMapData (a • φ) h₁ h₂ where
φQ := a • γ.φQ
φH := a • γ.φH
end RightHomologyMapData
variable (h₁ h₂ φ)
variable (a : R)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_smul :
rightHomologyMap' (a • φ) h₁ h₂ = a • rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [(γ.smul a).rightHomologyMap'_eq, RightHomologyMapData.smul_φH, γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq]
| @[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_smul :
opcyclesMap' (a • φ) h₁ h₂ = a • opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ := by
have γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
simp only [(γ.smul a).opcyclesMap'_eq, RightHomologyMapData.smul_φQ, γ.opcyclesMap'_eq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Linear.lean | 130 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
/-!
# Lemmas about commuting elements in a `MonoidWithZero` or a `GroupWithZero`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
namespace Ring
theorem mul_inverse_rev' {a b : M₀} (h : Commute a b) :
inverse (a * b) = inverse b * inverse a := by
by_cases hab : IsUnit (a * b)
· obtain ⟨⟨a, rfl⟩, b, rfl⟩ := h.isUnit_mul_iff.mp hab
rw [← Units.val_mul, inverse_unit, inverse_unit, inverse_unit, ← Units.val_mul, mul_inv_rev]
obtain ha | hb := not_and_or.mp (mt h.isUnit_mul_iff.mpr hab)
· rw [inverse_non_unit _ hab, inverse_non_unit _ ha, mul_zero]
· rw [inverse_non_unit _ hab, inverse_non_unit _ hb, zero_mul]
theorem mul_inverse_rev {M₀} [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] (a b : M₀) :
Ring.inverse (a * b) = inverse b * inverse a :=
mul_inverse_rev' (Commute.all _ _)
lemma inverse_pow (r : M₀) : ∀ n : ℕ, Ring.inverse r ^ n = Ring.inverse (r ^ n)
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ring.inverse_one]
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, Ring.mul_inverse_rev' ((Commute.refl r).pow_left n),
Ring.inverse_pow r n]
lemma inverse_pow_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul {a : M₀} (b c : M₀) (ha : IsUnit a) {k : ℕ} :
| Ring.inverse a ^ k * b = c ↔ b = a ^ k * c := by
rw [Ring.inverse_pow, Ring.inverse_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul _ _ _ (IsUnit.pow _ ha)]
end Ring
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Commute.lean | 42 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.OpenCover
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyClosed
/-!
# Properties of maps that are local at the target or at the source.
We show that the following properties of continuous maps are local at the target :
- `IsInducing`
- `IsOpenMap`
- `IsClosedMap`
- `IsEmbedding`
- `IsOpenEmbedding`
- `IsClosedEmbedding`
- `GeneralizingMap`
We show that the following properties of continuous maps are local at the source:
- `IsOpenMap`
- `GeneralizingMap`
-/
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace Topology
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
variable {ι : Type*} {U : ι → Opens β}
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_isInducing (s : Set β) (h : IsInducing f) :
IsInducing (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
simp_rw [← IsInducing.subtypeVal.of_comp_iff, isInducing_iff_nhds, restrictPreimage,
MapsTo.coe_restrict, restrict_eq, ← @Filter.comap_comap _ _ _ _ _ f, Function.comp_apply] at h ⊢
intro a
rw [← h, ← IsInducing.subtypeVal.nhds_eq_comap]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Set.restrictPreimage_inducing := Set.restrictPreimage_isInducing
alias Topology.IsInducing.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_isInducing
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.restrictPreimage := IsInducing.restrictPreimage
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_isEmbedding (s : Set β) (h : IsEmbedding f) :
IsEmbedding (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨h.1.restrictPreimage s, h.2.restrictPreimage s⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Set.restrictPreimage_embedding := Set.restrictPreimage_isEmbedding
alias Topology.IsEmbedding.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_isEmbedding
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.restrictPreimage := IsEmbedding.restrictPreimage
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_isOpenEmbedding (s : Set β) (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
IsOpenEmbedding (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨h.1.restrictPreimage s,
(s.range_restrictPreimage f).symm ▸ continuous_subtype_val.isOpen_preimage _ h.isOpen_range⟩
alias Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_isOpenEmbedding
theorem Set.restrictPreimage_isClosedEmbedding (s : Set β) (h : IsClosedEmbedding f) :
IsClosedEmbedding (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
⟨h.1.restrictPreimage s,
(s.range_restrictPreimage f).symm ▸ IsInducing.subtypeVal.isClosed_preimage _ h.isClosed_range⟩
alias Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.restrictPreimage := Set.restrictPreimage_isClosedEmbedding
theorem IsClosedMap.restrictPreimage (H : IsClosedMap f) (s : Set β) :
IsClosedMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
intro t
suffices ∀ u, IsClosed u → Subtype.val ⁻¹' u = t →
∃ v, IsClosed v ∧ Subtype.val ⁻¹' v = s.restrictPreimage f '' t by
simpa [isClosed_induced_iff]
exact fun u hu e => ⟨f '' u, H u hu, by simp [← e, image_restrictPreimage]⟩
theorem IsOpenMap.restrictPreimage (H : IsOpenMap f) (s : Set β) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
intro t
suffices ∀ u, IsOpen u → Subtype.val ⁻¹' u = t →
∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ Subtype.val ⁻¹' v = s.restrictPreimage f '' t by
simpa [isOpen_induced_iff]
exact fun u hu e => ⟨f '' u, H u hu, by simp [← e, image_restrictPreimage]⟩
lemma GeneralizingMap.restrictPreimage (H : GeneralizingMap f) (s : Set β) :
GeneralizingMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
intro x y h
obtain ⟨a, ha, hy⟩ := H (h.map <| continuous_subtype_val (p := s))
use ⟨a, by simp [hy]⟩
simp [hy, subtype_specializes_iff, ha]
namespace TopologicalSpace.IsOpenCover
section LocalAtTarget
variable {U : ι → Opens β} {s : Set β} (hU : IsOpenCover U)
include hU
theorem isOpen_iff_inter :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (s ∩ U i) := by
constructor
· exact fun H i ↦ H.inter (U i).isOpen
· intro H
simpa [← inter_iUnion, hU.iSup_set_eq_univ] using isOpen_iUnion H
theorem isOpen_iff_coe_preimage :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set (U i)) := by
simp [hU.isOpen_iff_inter (s := s), (U _).2.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
theorem isClosed_iff_coe_preimage {s : Set β} :
IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set (U i)) := by
simpa using hU.isOpen_iff_coe_preimage (s := sᶜ)
theorem isLocallyClosed_iff_coe_preimage {s : Set β} :
IsLocallyClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsLocallyClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set (U i)) := by
have (i) : coborder ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set (U i)) = Subtype.val ⁻¹' coborder s :=
(U i).isOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.coborder_preimage _
simp [isLocallyClosed_iff_isOpen_coborder, hU.isOpen_iff_coe_preimage, this]
theorem isOpenMap_iff_restrictPreimage :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsOpenMap ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ h.restrictPreimage _, fun H s hs ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hU.isOpen_iff_coe_preimage]
| intro i
convert H i _ (hs.preimage continuous_subtype_val)
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
suffices (∃ y, y ∈ s ∧ f y = x) ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ s ∧ f y ∈ U i ∧ f y = x by simpa [← Subtype.coe_inj]
exact ⟨fun ⟨a, b, c⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, c.symm ▸ hx, c⟩, by tauto⟩
theorem isClosedMap_iff_restrictPreimage :
IsClosedMap f ↔ ∀ i, IsClosedMap ((U i).1.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => h.restrictPreimage _, fun H s hs ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hU.isClosed_iff_coe_preimage]
intro i
convert H i _ ⟨⟨_, hs.1, eq_compl_comm.mpr rfl⟩⟩
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
suffices (∃ y, y ∈ s ∧ f y = x) ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ s ∧ f y ∈ U i ∧ f y = x by simpa [← Subtype.coe_inj]
exact ⟨fun ⟨a, b, c⟩ => ⟨a, b, c.symm ▸ hx, c⟩, by tauto⟩
theorem isInducing_iff_restrictPreimage (h : Continuous f) :
| Mathlib/Topology/LocalAtTarget.lean | 129 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Aaron Anderson, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
/-!
# support of a permutation
## Main definitions
In the following, `f g : Equiv.Perm α`.
* `Equiv.Perm.Disjoint`: two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if every element is fixed
either by `f`, or by `g`.
Equivalently, `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` iff their `support` are disjoint.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsSwap`: `f = swap x y` for `x ≠ y`.
* `Equiv.Perm.support`: the elements `x : α` that are not fixed by `f`.
Assume `α` is a Fintype:
* `Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one f` says that `f` has
strictly less than `Fintype.card α - 1` fixed points, unless `f = 1`.
(Equivalently, `f.support` has at least 2 elements.)
-/
open Equiv Finset Function
namespace Equiv.Perm
variable {α : Type*}
section Disjoint
/-- Two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if their supports are disjoint, i.e.,
every element is fixed either by `f`, or by `g`. -/
def Disjoint (f g : Perm α) :=
∀ x, f x = x ∨ g x = x
variable {f g h : Perm α}
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm : Disjoint f g → Disjoint g f := by simp only [Disjoint, or_comm, imp_self]
theorem Disjoint.symmetric : Symmetric (@Disjoint α) := fun _ _ => Disjoint.symm
instance : IsSymm (Perm α) Disjoint :=
⟨Disjoint.symmetric⟩
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint f g ↔ Disjoint g f :=
⟨Disjoint.symm, Disjoint.symm⟩
theorem Disjoint.commute (h : Disjoint f g) : Commute f g :=
Equiv.ext fun x =>
(h x).elim
(fun hf =>
(h (g x)).elim (fun hg => by simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]) fun hg => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, g.injective hg])
fun hg =>
(h (f x)).elim (fun hf => by simp [mul_apply, f.injective hf, hg]) fun hf => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_left (f : Perm α) : Disjoint 1 f := fun _ => Or.inl rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_right (f : Perm α) : Disjoint f 1 := fun _ => Or.inr rfl
theorem disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq : Disjoint f g ↔ ∀ x : α, f x = x ∨ g x = x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_refl_iff : Disjoint f f ↔ f = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ disjoint_one_left 1⟩
ext x
rcases h x with hx | hx <;> simp [hx]
theorem Disjoint.inv_left (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f⁻¹ g := by
intro x
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, eq_comm]
exact h x
theorem Disjoint.inv_right (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f g⁻¹ :=
h.symm.inv_left.symm
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_left_iff : Disjoint f⁻¹ g ↔ Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.inv_left⟩
convert h.inv_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_right_iff : Disjoint f g⁻¹ ↔ Disjoint f g := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_inv_left_iff, disjoint_comm]
theorem Disjoint.mul_left (H1 : Disjoint f h) (H2 : Disjoint g h) : Disjoint (f * g) h := fun x =>
by cases H1 x <;> cases H2 x <;> simp [*]
theorem Disjoint.mul_right (H1 : Disjoint f g) (H2 : Disjoint f h) : Disjoint f (g * h) := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
exact H1.symm.mul_left H2.symm
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: make it `@[simp]`
theorem disjoint_conj (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) ↔ Disjoint f g :=
(h⁻¹).forall_congr fun {_} ↦ by simp only [mul_apply, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem Disjoint.conj (H : Disjoint f g) (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) :=
(disjoint_conj h).2 H
theorem disjoint_prod_right (l : List (Perm α)) (h : ∀ g ∈ l, Disjoint f g) :
Disjoint f l.prod := by
induction' l with g l ih
· exact disjoint_one_right _
· rw [List.prod_cons]
exact (h _ List.mem_cons_self).mul_right (ih fun g hg => h g (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg))
theorem disjoint_noncommProd_right {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j))
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, g.Disjoint (k i)) :
Disjoint g (s.noncommProd k (hs)) :=
noncommProd_induction s k hs g.Disjoint (fun _ _ ↦ Disjoint.mul_right) (disjoint_one_right g) hg
open scoped List in
theorem disjoint_prod_perm {l₁ l₂ : List (Perm α)} (hl : l₁.Pairwise Disjoint) (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.prod = l₂.prod :=
hp.prod_eq' <| hl.imp Disjoint.commute
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint {l : List (Perm α)} (h1 : (1 : Perm α) ∉ l)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup := by
refine List.Pairwise.imp_of_mem ?_ h2
intro τ σ h_mem _ h_disjoint _
subst τ
suffices (σ : Perm α) = 1 by
rw [this] at h_mem
exact h1 h_mem
exact ext fun a => or_self_iff.mp (h_disjoint a)
theorem pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, hfx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n]
theorem zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℤ, (f ^ n) x = x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx]
theorem pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x ∨ (f ^ n) x = f x
| 0 => Or.inl rfl
| n + 1 =>
(pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n).elim
(fun h => Or.inr (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h]))
fun h => Or.inl (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h, hffx])
theorem zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = x ∨ (f ^ i) x = f x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, ← f.injective.eq_iff, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ', eq_comm,
inv_eq_iff_eq, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ, @eq_comm _ x, or_comm]
exact pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx _
theorem Disjoint.mul_apply_eq_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) {a : α} :
(σ * τ) a = a ↔ σ a = a ∧ τ a = a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [mul_apply, h.2, h.1]⟩
rcases hστ a with hσ | hτ
· exact ⟨hσ, σ.injective (h.trans hσ.symm)⟩
· exact ⟨(congr_arg σ hτ).symm.trans h, hτ⟩
theorem Disjoint.mul_eq_one_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) :
σ * τ = 1 ↔ σ = 1 ∧ τ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, one_apply, hστ.mul_apply_eq_iff, forall_and]
theorem Disjoint.zpow_disjoint_zpow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℤ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) := fun x =>
Or.imp (fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h m)
(fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h n) (hστ x)
theorem Disjoint.pow_disjoint_pow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℕ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) :=
hστ.zpow_disjoint_zpow m n
end Disjoint
section IsSwap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- `f.IsSwap` indicates that the permutation `f` is a transposition of two elements. -/
def IsSwap (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ f = swap x y
@[simp]
theorem ofSubtype_swap_eq {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (x y : Subtype p) :
ofSubtype (Equiv.swap x y) = Equiv.swap ↑x ↑y :=
Equiv.ext fun z => by
by_cases hz : p z
· rw [swap_apply_def, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _ hz]
split_ifs with hzx hzy
· simp_rw [hzx, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_left]
· simp_rw [hzy, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_right]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
simp [Subtype.ext_iff, *]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _ hz, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop x
intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop y
theorem IsSwap.of_subtype_isSwap {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : Perm (Subtype p)}
(h : f.IsSwap) : (ofSubtype f).IsSwap :=
let ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩, hxy⟩ := h
⟨x, y, by
simp only [Ne, Subtype.ext_iff] at hxy
exact hxy.1, by
rw [hxy.2, ofSubtype_swap_eq]⟩
theorem ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self {f : Perm α} {x y : α} (hy : (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y) :
f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := by
simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, f.injective.eq_iff] at *
by_cases h : f y = x
· constructor <;> intro <;> simp_all only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne]
· split_ifs at hy with h <;> try { simp [*] at * }
end IsSwap
section support
section Set
variable (p q : Perm α)
theorem set_support_inv_eq : { x | p⁻¹ x ≠ x } = { x | p x ≠ x } := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [inv_def, symm_apply_eq, eq_comm]
theorem set_support_apply_mem {p : Perm α} {a : α} :
p a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } ↔ a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } := by simp
theorem set_support_zpow_subset (n : ℤ) : { x | (p ^ n) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
intro hx H
simp [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self H] at hx
theorem set_support_mul_subset : { x | (p * q) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } ∪ { x | q x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
by_cases hq : q x = x <;> simp [hq]
end Set
@[simp]
theorem apply_pow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_pow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem apply_zpow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℤ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_zpow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {f g : Perm α}
/-- The `Finset` of nonfixed points of a permutation. -/
def support (f : Perm α) : Finset α := {x | f x ≠ x}
@[simp]
theorem mem_support {x : α} : x ∈ f.support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [support, mem_filter, and_iff_right (mem_univ x)]
theorem not_mem_support {x : α} : x ∉ f.support ↔ f x = x := by simp
theorem coe_support_eq_set_support (f : Perm α) : (f.support : Set α) = { x | f x ≠ x } := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {σ : Perm α} : σ.support = ∅ ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, not_not,
Equiv.Perm.ext_iff, one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem support_one : (1 : Perm α).support = ∅ := by rw [support_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem support_refl : support (Equiv.refl α) = ∅ :=
support_one
theorem support_congr (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) (h' : ∀ x ∈ g.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ g.support
· exact h' x hx
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx, ← not_mem_support]
exact fun H => hx (h H)
/-- If g and c commute, then g stabilizes the support of c -/
theorem mem_support_iff_of_commute {g c : Perm α} (hgc : Commute g c) (x : α) :
x ∈ c.support ↔ g x ∈ c.support := by
simp only [mem_support, not_iff_not, ← mul_apply]
rw [← hgc, mul_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
theorem support_mul_le (f g : Perm α) : (f * g).support ≤ f.support ⊔ g.support := fun x => by
simp only [sup_eq_union]
rw [mem_union, mem_support, mem_support, mem_support, mul_apply, ← not_and_or, not_imp_not]
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
rw [hg, hf]
theorem exists_mem_support_of_mem_support_prod {l : List (Perm α)} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ l.prod.support) : ∃ f : Perm α, f ∈ l ∧ x ∈ f.support := by
contrapose! hx
simp_rw [mem_support, not_not] at hx ⊢
induction' l with f l ih
· rfl
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_apply, ih, hx]
| · simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons, true_or]
intros f' hf'
refine hx f' ?_
simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons]
exact Or.inr hf'
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Support.lean | 324 | 329 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Derivative and series expansion of real logarithm
In this file we prove that `Real.log` is infinitely smooth at all nonzero `x : ℝ`. We also prove
that the series `∑' n : ℕ, x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)` converges to `(-Real.log (1 - x))` for all
`x : ℝ`, `|x| < 1`.
## Tags
logarithm, derivative
-/
open Filter Finset Set
open scoped Topology ContDiff
namespace Real
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
have : HasStrictDerivAt log (exp <| log x)⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_exp <| log x).of_local_left_inverse (continuousAt_log hx.ne')
(ne_of_gt <| exp_pos _) <|
Eventually.mono (lt_mem_nhds hx) @exp_log
rwa [exp_log hx] at this
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· convert (hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr hx)).comp x (hasStrictDerivAt_neg x) using 1
· ext y; exact (log_neg_eq_log y).symm
· field_simp [hx.ne]
· exact hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos hx
theorem hasDerivAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt log x⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).hasDerivAt
@[fun_prop] theorem differentiableAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ log x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).differentiableAt
theorem differentiableOn_log : DifferentiableOn ℝ log {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(differentiableAt_log hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_log_iff : DifferentiableAt ℝ log x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h => continuousAt_log_iff.1 h.continuousAt, differentiableAt_log⟩
theorem deriv_log (x : ℝ) : deriv log x = x⁻¹ :=
if hx : x = 0 then by
rw [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (differentiableAt_log_iff.not_left.2 hx), hx, inv_zero]
else (hasDerivAt_log hx).deriv
@[simp]
theorem deriv_log' : deriv log = Inv.inv :=
funext deriv_log
theorem contDiffAt_log {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {x : ℝ} : ContDiffAt ℝ n log x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ continuousAt_log_iff.1 h.continuousAt, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
have A y (hy : 0 < y) : ContDiffAt ℝ n log y := by
apply expPartialHomeomorph.contDiffAt_symm_deriv (f₀' := y) hy.ne' (by simpa)
· convert hasDerivAt_exp (log y)
rw [exp_log hy]
· exact analyticAt_rexp.contDiffAt
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· have : ContDiffAt ℝ n (log ∘ (fun y ↦ -y)) x := by
apply ContDiffAt.comp
apply A _ (Left.neg_pos_iff.mpr hx)
apply contDiffAt_id.neg
convert this
ext x
simp
· exact A x hx
theorem contDiffOn_log {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiffOn ℝ n log {0}ᶜ := by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
exact (contDiffAt_log.2 hx).contDiffWithinAt
end Real
section LogDifferentiable
open Real
section deriv
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x f' : ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.log (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) s x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.log (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hf.log hx
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.log (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).comp x hf
theorem derivWithin.log (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℝ s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => log (f x)) s x = derivWithin f s x / f x :=
(hf.hasDerivWithinAt.log hx).derivWithin hxs
@[simp]
theorem deriv.log (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x => log (f x)) x = deriv f x / f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.log hx).deriv
/-- The derivative of `log ∘ f` is the logarithmic derivative provided `f` is differentiable and
`f x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma Real.deriv_log_comp_eq_logDeriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (h₁ : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h₂ : f x ≠ 0) : deriv (log ∘ f) x = logDeriv f x := by
simp only [ne_eq, logDeriv, Pi.div_apply, ← deriv.log h₁ h₂, Function.comp_def]
end deriv
section fderiv
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {f : E → ℝ} {x : E} {f' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
{s : Set E}
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.log (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => log (f x)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') s x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.log (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => log (f x)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.log (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => log (f x)) ((f x)⁻¹ • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.log (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.log hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.log (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.log hx).differentiableAt
theorem ContDiffAt.log {n} (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => log (f x)) x :=
(contDiffAt_log.2 hx).comp x hf
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.log {n} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => log (f x)) s x :=
(contDiffAt_log.2 hx).comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
theorem ContDiffOn.log {n} (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => log (f x)) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).log (hs x hx)
theorem ContDiff.log {n} (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => log (f x) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun x => hf.contDiffAt.log (h x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.log (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (hx : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) s := fun x h => (hf x h).log (hx x h)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.log (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hx : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
Differentiable ℝ fun x => log (f x) := fun x => (hf x).log (hx x)
theorem fderivWithin.log (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℝ s x) :
fderivWithin ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) s x = (f x)⁻¹ • fderivWithin ℝ f s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.log hx).fderivWithin hxs
@[simp]
theorem fderiv.log (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
fderiv ℝ (fun x => log (f x)) x = (f x)⁻¹ • fderiv ℝ f x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.log hx).fderiv
end fderiv
end LogDifferentiable
namespace Real
/-- The function `x * log (1 + t / x)` tends to `t` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_log_one_plus_div_atTop (t : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun x => x * log (1 + t / x)) atTop (𝓝 t) := by
have h₁ : Tendsto (fun h => h⁻¹ * log (1 + t * h)) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 t) := by
simpa [hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope, slope_fun_def] using
(((hasDerivAt_id (0 : ℝ)).const_mul t).const_add 1).log (by simp)
have h₂ : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x⁻¹) atTop (𝓝[≠] 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_nhdsGT_zero.mono_right (nhdsGT_le_nhdsNE _)
simpa only [Function.comp_def, inv_inv] using h₁.comp h₂
/-- A crude lemma estimating the difference between `log (1-x)` and its Taylor series at `0`,
where the main point of the bound is that it tends to `0`. The goal is to deduce the series
expansion of the logarithm, in `hasSum_pow_div_log_of_abs_lt_1`.
TODO: use one of generic theorems about Taylor's series to prove this estimate.
-/
theorem abs_log_sub_add_sum_range_le {x : ℝ} (h : |x| < 1) (n : ℕ) :
|(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)) + log (1 - x)| ≤ |x| ^ (n + 1) / (1 - |x|) := by
/- For the proof, we show that the derivative of the function to be estimated is small,
and then apply the mean value inequality. -/
let F : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)) + log (1 - x)
let F' : ℝ → ℝ := fun x ↦ -x ^ n / (1 - x)
-- Porting note: In `mathlib3`, the proof used `deriv`/`DifferentiableAt`. `simp` failed to
-- compute `deriv`, so I changed the proof to use `HasDerivAt` instead
-- First step: compute the derivative of `F`
have A : ∀ y ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivAt F (F' y) y := fun y hy ↦ by
have : HasDerivAt F ((∑ i ∈ range n, ↑(i + 1) * y ^ i / (↑i + 1)) + (-1) / (1 - y)) y :=
.add (.sum fun i _ ↦ (hasDerivAt_pow (i + 1) y).div_const ((i : ℝ) + 1))
(((hasDerivAt_id y).const_sub _).log <| sub_ne_zero.2 hy.2.ne')
convert this using 1
calc
-y ^ n / (1 - y) = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, y ^ i + -1 / (1 - y) := by
field_simp [geom_sum_eq hy.2.ne, sub_ne_zero.2 hy.2.ne, sub_ne_zero.2 hy.2.ne']
ring
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, ↑(i + 1) * y ^ i / (↑i + 1) + -1 / (1 - y) := by
congr with i
rw [Nat.cast_succ, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Nat.cast_add_one_pos i).ne']
-- second step: show that the derivative of `F` is small
have B : ∀ y ∈ Icc (-|x|) |x|, |F' y| ≤ |x| ^ n / (1 - |x|) := fun y hy ↦
calc
|F' y| = |y| ^ n / |1 - y| := by simp [F', abs_div]
_ ≤ |x| ^ n / (1 - |x|) := by
have : |y| ≤ |x| := abs_le.2 hy
have : 1 - |x| ≤ |1 - y| := le_trans (by linarith [hy.2]) (le_abs_self _)
gcongr
exact sub_pos.2 h
-- third step: apply the mean value inequality
have C : ‖F x - F 0‖ ≤ |x| ^ n / (1 - |x|) * ‖x - 0‖ := by
refine Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le
(fun y hy ↦ (A _ ?_).hasDerivWithinAt) B (convex_Icc _ _) ?_ ?_
· exact Icc_subset_Ioo (neg_lt_neg h) h hy
· simp
· simp [le_abs_self x, neg_le.mp (neg_le_abs x)]
-- fourth step: conclude by massaging the inequality of the third step
simpa [F, div_mul_eq_mul_div, pow_succ] using C
/-- Power series expansion of the logarithm around `1`. -/
theorem hasSum_pow_div_log_of_abs_lt_one {x : ℝ} (h : |x| < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)) (-log (1 - x)) := by
rw [Summable.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
· show Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)) atTop (𝓝 (-log (1 - x)))
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
simp only [norm_eq_abs, sub_neg_eq_add]
refine squeeze_zero (fun n => abs_nonneg _) (abs_log_sub_add_sum_range_le h) ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun t : ℕ => |x| ^ (t + 1) / (1 - |x|)) atTop (𝓝 (|x| * 0 / (1 - |x|))) by
simpa
simp only [pow_succ']
refine (tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_).div_const _
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg _) h
show Summable fun n : ℕ => x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)
refine .of_norm_bounded _ (summable_geometric_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg _) h) fun i => ?_
calc
‖x ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1)‖ = |x| ^ (i + 1) / (i + 1) := by
have : (0 : ℝ) ≤ i + 1 := le_of_lt (Nat.cast_add_one_pos i)
rw [norm_eq_abs, abs_div, ← pow_abs, abs_of_nonneg this]
_ ≤ |x| ^ (i + 1) / (0 + 1) := by
gcongr
exact i.cast_nonneg
_ ≤ |x| ^ i := by
simpa [pow_succ] using mul_le_of_le_one_right (pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg x) i) (le_of_lt h)
/-- Power series expansion of `log(1 + x) - log(1 - x)` for `|x| < 1`. -/
theorem hasSum_log_sub_log_of_abs_lt_one {x : ℝ} (h : |x| < 1) :
HasSum (fun k : ℕ => (2 : ℝ) * (1 / (2 * k + 1)) * x ^ (2 * k + 1))
(log (1 + x) - log (1 - x)) := by
set term := fun n : ℕ => -1 * ((-x) ^ (n + 1) / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) + x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)
have h_term_eq_goal :
term ∘ (2 * ·) = fun k : ℕ => 2 * (1 / (2 * k + 1)) * x ^ (2 * k + 1) := by
ext n
dsimp only [term, (· ∘ ·)]
rw [Odd.neg_pow (⟨n, rfl⟩ : Odd (2 * n + 1)) x]
push_cast
ring_nf
rw [← h_term_eq_goal, (mul_right_injective₀ (two_ne_zero' ℕ)).hasSum_iff]
· have h₁ := (hasSum_pow_div_log_of_abs_lt_one (Eq.trans_lt (abs_neg x) h)).mul_left (-1)
convert h₁.add (hasSum_pow_div_log_of_abs_lt_one h) using 1
ring_nf
· intro m hm
| rw [range_two_mul, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← Nat.even_add_one] at hm
dsimp [term]
rw [Even.neg_pow hm, neg_one_mul, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Expansion of `log (1 + a⁻¹)` as a series in powers of `1 / (2 * a + 1)`. -/
theorem hasSum_log_one_add_inv {a : ℝ} (h : 0 < a) :
HasSum (fun k : ℕ => (2 : ℝ) * (1 / (2 * k + 1)) * (1 / (2 * a + 1)) ^ (2 * k + 1))
(log (1 + a⁻¹)) := by
have h₁ : |1 / (2 * a + 1)| < 1 := by
rw [abs_of_pos, div_lt_one]
· linarith
· linarith
· exact div_pos one_pos (by linarith)
convert hasSum_log_sub_log_of_abs_lt_one h₁ using 1
have h₂ : (2 : ℝ) * a + 1 ≠ 0 := by linarith
have h₃ := h.ne'
rw [← log_div]
· congr
field_simp
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Deriv.lean | 297 | 315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Matroids
A `Matroid` is a structure that combinatorially abstracts
the notion of linear independence and dependence;
matroids have connections with graph theory, discrete optimization,
additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry.
Mathematically, a matroid `M` is a structure on a set `E` comprising a
collection of subsets of `E` called the bases of `M`,
where the bases are required to obey certain axioms.
This file gives a definition of a matroid `M` in terms of its bases,
and some API relating independent sets (subsets of bases) and the notion of a
basis of a set `X` (a maximal independent subset of `X`).
## Main definitions
* a `Matroid α` on a type `α` is a structure comprising a 'ground set'
and a suitably behaved 'base' predicate.
Given `M : Matroid α` ...
* `M.E` denotes the ground set of `M`, which has type `Set α`
* For `B : Set α`, `M.IsBase B` means that `B` is a base of `M`.
* For `I : Set α`, `M.Indep I` means that `I` is independent in `M`
(that is, `I` is contained in a base of `M`).
* For `D : Set α`, `M.Dep D` means that `D` is contained in the ground set of `M`
but isn't independent.
* For `I : Set α` and `X : Set α`, `M.IsBasis I X` means that `I` is a maximal independent
subset of `X`.
* `M.Finite` means that `M` has finite ground set.
* `M.Nonempty` means that the ground set of `M` is nonempty.
* `RankFinite M` means that the bases of `M` are finite.
* `RankInfinite M` means that the bases of `M` are infinite.
* `RankPos M` means that the bases of `M` are nonempty.
* `Finitary M` means that a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are
independent.
* `aesop_mat` : a tactic designed to prove `X ⊆ M.E` for some set `X` and matroid `M`.
## Implementation details
There are a few design decisions worth discussing.
### Finiteness
The first is that our matroids are allowed to be infinite.
Unlike with many mathematical structures, this isn't such an obvious choice.
Finite matroids have been studied since the 1930's,
and there was never controversy as to what is and isn't an example of a finite matroid -
in fact, surprisingly many apparently different definitions of a matroid
give rise to the same class of objects.
However, generalizing different definitions of a finite matroid
to the infinite in the obvious way (i.e. by simply allowing the ground set to be infinite)
gives a number of different notions of 'infinite matroid' that disagree with each other,
and that all lack nice properties.
Many different competing notions of infinite matroid were studied through the years;
in fact, the problem of which definition is the best was only really solved in 2013,
when Bruhn et al. [2] showed that there is a unique 'reasonable' notion of an infinite matroid
(these objects had previously defined by Higgs under the name 'B-matroid').
These are defined by adding one carefully chosen axiom to the standard set,
and adapting existing axioms to not mention set cardinalities;
they enjoy nearly all the nice properties of standard finite matroids.
Even though at least 90% of the literature is on finite matroids,
B-matroids are the definition we use, because they allow for additional generality,
nearly all theorems are still true and just as easy to state,
and (hopefully) the more general definition will prevent the need for a costly future refactor.
The disadvantage is that developing API for the finite case is harder work
(for instance, it is harder to prove that something is a matroid in the first place,
and one must deal with `ℕ∞` rather than `ℕ`).
For serious work on finite matroids, we provide the typeclasses
`[M.Finite]` and `[RankFinite M]` and associated API.
### Cardinality
Just as with bases of a vector space,
all bases of a finite matroid `M` are finite and have the same cardinality;
this cardinality is an important invariant known as the 'rank' of `M`.
For infinite matroids, bases are not in general equicardinal;
in fact the equicardinality of bases of infinite matroids is independent of ZFC [3].
What is still true is that either all bases are finite and equicardinal,
or all bases are infinite. This means that the natural notion of 'size'
for a set in matroid theory is given by the function `Set.encard`, which
is the cardinality as a term in `ℕ∞`. We use this function extensively
in building the API; it is preferable to both `Set.ncard` and `Finset.card`
because it allows infinite sets to be handled without splitting into cases.
### The ground `Set`
A last place where we make a consequential choice is making the ground set of a matroid
a structure field of type `Set α` (where `α` is the type of 'possible matroid elements')
rather than just having a type `α` of all the matroid elements.
This is because of how common it is to simultaneously consider
a number of matroids on different but related ground sets.
For example, a matroid `M` on ground set `E` can have its structure
'restricted' to some subset `R ⊆ E` to give a smaller matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`.
A statement like `(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂` is mathematically obvious.
But if the ground set of a matroid is a type, this doesn't typecheck,
and is only true up to canonical isomorphism.
Restriction is just the tip of the iceberg here;
one can also 'contract' and 'delete' elements and sets of elements
in a matroid to give a smaller matroid,
and in practice it is common to make statements like `M₁.E = M₂.E ∩ M₃.E` and
`((M ⟋ e) ↾ R) ⟋ C = M ⟋ (C ∪ {e}) ↾ R`.
Such things are a nightmare to work with unless `=` is actually propositional equality
(especially because the relevant coercions are usually between sets and not just elements).
So the solution is that the ground set `M.E` has type `Set α`,
and there are elements of type `α` that aren't in the matroid.
The tradeoff is that for many statements, one now has to add
hypotheses of the form `X ⊆ M.E` to make sure than `X` is actually 'in the matroid',
rather than letting a 'type of matroid elements' take care of this invisibly.
It still seems that this is worth it.
The tactic `aesop_mat` exists specifically to discharge such goals
with minimal fuss (using default values).
The tactic works fairly well, but has room for improvement.
A related decision is to not have matroids themselves be a typeclass.
This would make things be notationally simpler
(having `Base` in the presence of `[Matroid α]` rather than `M.Base` for a term `M : Matroid α`)
but is again just too awkward when one has multiple matroids on the same type.
In fact, in regular written mathematics,
it is normal to explicitly indicate which matroid something is happening in,
so our notation mirrors common practice.
### Notation
We use a few nonstandard conventions in theorem names that are related to the above.
First, we mirror common informal practice by referring explicitly to the `ground` set rather
than the notation `E`. (Writing `ground` everywhere in a proof term would be unwieldy, and
writing `E` in theorem names would be unnatural to read.)
Second, because we are typically interested in subsets of the ground set `M.E`,
using `Set.compl` is inconvenient, since `Xᶜ ⊆ M.E` is typically false for `X ⊆ M.E`.
On the other hand (especially when duals arise), it is common to complement
a set `X ⊆ M.E` *within* the ground set, giving `M.E \ X`.
For this reason, we use the term `compl` in theorem names to refer to taking a set difference
with respect to the ground set, rather than a complement within a type. The lemma
`compl_isBase_dual` is one of the many examples of this.
Finally, in theorem names, matroid predicates that apply to sets
(such as `Base`, `Indep`, `IsBasis`) are typically used as suffixes rather than prefixes.
For instance, we have `ground_indep_iff_isBase` rather than `indep_ground_iff_isBase`.
## References
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
* [H. Bruhn, R. Diestel, M. Kriesell, R. Pendavingh, P. Wollan, Axioms for infinite matroids,
Adv. Math 239 (2013), 18-46][bruhnDiestelKriesselPendavinghWollan2013]
* [N. Bowler, S. Geschke, Self-dual uniform matroids on infinite sets,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 459-471][bowlerGeschke2015]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
/-- A predicate `P` on sets satisfies the **exchange property** if,
for all `X` and `Y` satisfying `P` and all `a ∈ X \ Y`, there exists `b ∈ Y \ X` so that
swapping `a` for `b` in `X` maintains `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
/-- A set `X` has the maximal subset property for a predicate `P` if every subset of `X` satisfying
`P` is contained in a maximal subset of `X` satisfying `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → ∃ J, I ⊆ J ∧ Maximal (fun K ↦ P K ∧ K ⊆ X) J
/-- A `Matroid α` is a ground set `E` of type `Set α`, and a nonempty collection of its subsets
satisfying the exchange property and the maximal subset property. Each such set is called a
`Base` of `M`. An `Indep`endent set is just a set contained in a base, but we include this
predicate as a structure field for better definitional properties.
In most cases, using this definition directly is not the best way to construct a matroid,
since it requires specifying both the bases and independent sets. If the bases are known,
use `Matroid.ofBase` or a variant. If just the independent sets are known,
define an `IndepMatroid`, and then use `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
-/
structure Matroid (α : Type*) where
/-- `M` has a ground set `E`. -/
(E : Set α)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Base` defining its bases. -/
(IsBase : Set α → Prop)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Indep` defining its independent sets. -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
/-- The `Indep`endent sets are those contained in `Base`s. -/
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B)
/-- There is at least one `Base`. -/
(exists_isBase : ∃ B, IsBase B)
/-- For any bases `B`, `B'` and `e ∈ B \ B'`, there is some `f ∈ B' \ B` for which `B-e+f`
is a base. -/
(isBase_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty IsBase)
/-- Every independent subset `I` of a set `X` for is contained in a maximal independent
subset of `X`. -/
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
/-- Every base is contained in the ground set. -/
(subset_ground : ∀ B, IsBase B → B ⊆ E)
attribute [local ext] Matroid
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Base := IsBase
instance (M : Matroid α) : Nonempty {B // M.IsBase B} :=
nonempty_subtype.2 M.exists_isBase
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having finite ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Finite`. -/
@[mk_iff] protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is finite -/
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having nonempty ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Nonempty`. -/
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is nonempty -/
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
lemma nonempty_type (M : Matroid α) [h : M.Nonempty] : Nonempty α :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty.some⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
/-- A `RankFinite` matroid is one whose bases are finite -/
@[mk_iff] class RankFinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is a finite base -/
exists_finite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias FiniteRk := RankFinite
instance rankFinite_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : RankFinite M :=
⟨M.exists_isBase.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
/-- An `RankInfinite` matroid is one whose bases are infinite. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is an infinite base -/
exists_infinite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias InfiniteRk := RankInfinite
/-- A `RankPos` matroid is one whose bases are nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The empty set isn't a base -/
empty_not_isBase : ¬M.IsBase ∅
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias RkPos := RankPos
instance rankPos_nonempty {M : Matroid α} [M.RankPos] : M.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain rfl | ⟨e, heB⟩ := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact False.elim <| RankPos.empty_not_isBase hB
exact ⟨e, M.subset_ground B hB heB ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")] alias rkPos_iff_empty_not_base := rankPos_iff
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {IsBase : Set α → Prop} {B B' : Set α}
/-- A family of sets with the exchange property is an antichain. -/
theorem antichain (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB : IsBase B) (hB' : IsBase B') (h : B ⊆ B') :
B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
theorem encard_diff_le_aux {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
(exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
variable {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
/-- For any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property, the differences `B₁ \ B₂`
and `B₂ \ B₁` have the same `ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_diff_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
(encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB₂).antisymm (encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₂ hB₁)
/-- Any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property have the same
`ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_isBase_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter B₁ B₂, exch.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂, inter_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
end ExchangeProperty
end exchange
section aesop
/-- The `aesop_mat` tactic attempts to prove a set is contained in the ground set of a matroid.
It uses a `[Matroid]` ruleset, and is allowed to fail. -/
macro (name := aesop_mat) "aesop_mat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Matroid):ident]))
/- We add a number of trivial lemmas (deliberately specialized to statements in terms of the
ground set of a matroid) to the ruleset `Matroid` for `aesop`. -/
variable {X Y : Set α} {e : α}
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_right_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
X ∩ Y ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_left.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_left_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
Y ∩ X ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_right.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem diff_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : X \ Y ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_diff_subset_ground : M.E \ X ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset_ground rfl.subset
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem singleton_subset_ground (he : e ∈ M.E) : {e} ⊆ M.E :=
singleton_subset_iff.mpr he
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem subset_ground_of_subset (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hXY.trans hY
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem mem_ground_of_mem_of_subset (hX : X ⊆ M.E) (heX : e ∈ X) : e ∈ M.E :=
hX heX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem insert_subset_ground {e : α} {X : Set α} {M : Matroid α}
(he : e ∈ M.E) (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : insert e X ⊆ M.E :=
insert_subset he hX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_subset_ground {M : Matroid α} : M.E ⊆ M.E :=
rfl.subset
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])] empty_subset union_subset iUnion_subset
end aesop
section IsBase
variable {B B₁ B₂ : Set α}
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBase.subset_ground (hB : M.IsBase B) : B ⊆ M.E :=
M.subset_ground B hB
theorem IsBase.exchange {e : α} (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hx : e ∈ B₁ \ B₂) :
∃ y ∈ B₂ \ B₁, M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) :=
M.isBase_exchange B₁ B₂ hB₁ hB₂ _ hx
theorem IsBase.exchange_mem {e : α}
(hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hxB₁ : e ∈ B₁) (hxB₂ : e ∉ B₂) :
∃ y, (y ∈ B₂ ∧ y ∉ B₁) ∧ M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) := by
simpa using hB₁.exchange hB₂ ⟨hxB₁, hxB₂⟩
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hB₁B₂ : B₁ ⊆ B₂) :
B₁ = B₂ :=
M.isBase_exchange.antichain hB₁ hB₂ hB₁B₂
theorem IsBase.not_isBase_of_ssubset {X : Set α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (hX : X ⊂ B) : ¬ M.IsBase X :=
fun h ↦ hX.ne (h.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hX.subset)
theorem IsBase.insert_not_isBase {e : α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) :
¬ M.IsBase (insert e B) :=
fun h ↦ h.not_isBase_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) hB
theorem IsBase.encard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
M.isBase_exchange.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂
theorem IsBase.ncard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).ncard = (B₂ \ B₁).ncard := by
rw [ncard_def, hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [M.isBase_exchange.encard_isBase_eq hB₁ hB₂]
theorem IsBase.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.ncard = B₂.ncard := by
rw [ncard_def B₁, hB₁.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.finite_of_finite {B' : Set α}
(hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Finite) (hB' : M.IsBase B') : B'.Finite :=
(finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB')).mp h
theorem IsBase.infinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) :
B₁.Infinite :=
by_contra (fun hB_inf ↦ (hB₁.finite_of_finite (not_infinite.mp hB_inf) hB).not_infinite h)
theorem IsBase.finite [RankFinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Finite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankFinite M›.exists_finite_isBase
hB₀.1.finite_of_finite hB₀.2 hB
theorem IsBase.infinite [RankInfinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Infinite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankInfinite M›.exists_infinite_isBase
hB₀.1.infinite_of_infinite hB₀.2 hB
theorem empty_not_isBase [h : RankPos M] : ¬M.IsBase ∅ :=
h.empty_not_isBase
theorem IsBase.nonempty [RankPos M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact M.empty_not_isBase hB
theorem IsBase.rankPos_of_nonempty (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
rw [rankPos_iff]
intro he
obtain rfl := he.eq_of_subset_isBase hB (empty_subset B)
simp at h
theorem IsBase.rankFinite_of_finite (hB : M.IsBase B) (hfin : B.Finite) : RankFinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, hfin⟩⟩
theorem IsBase.rankInfinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) : RankInfinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, h⟩⟩
theorem not_rankFinite (M : Matroid α) [RankInfinite M] : ¬ RankFinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem not_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) [RankFinite M] : ¬ RankInfinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem rankFinite_or_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : RankFinite M ∨ RankInfinite M :=
let ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
B.finite_or_infinite.imp hB.rankFinite_of_finite hB.rankInfinite_of_infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-27")] alias finite_or_rankInfinite := rankFinite_or_rankInfinite
@[simp]
theorem not_rankFinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankFinite M ↔ RankInfinite M :=
M.rankFinite_or_rankInfinite.elim (fun h ↦ iff_of_false (by simpa) M.not_rankInfinite)
fun h ↦ iff_of_true M.not_rankFinite h
@[simp]
theorem not_rankInfinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankInfinite M ↔ RankFinite M := by
rw [← not_rankFinite_iff, not_not]
theorem IsBase.diff_finite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Finite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Finite :=
finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem IsBase.diff_infinite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Infinite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Infinite :=
infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem ext_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B)) : M₁ = M₂ := by
have h' : ∀ B, M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B :=
fun B ↦ ⟨fun hB ↦ (h hB.subset_ground).1 hB,
fun hB ↦ (h <| hB.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm).2 hB⟩
ext <;> simp [hE, M₁.indep_iff', M₂.indep_iff', h']
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_isBase_iff_isBase_forall := ext_isBase
theorem ext_iff_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ M₁.E = M₂.E ∧ ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simp [h], fun ⟨hE, h⟩ ↦ ext_isBase hE h⟩
theorem isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ↔ Maximal (fun I ↦ I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) B := by
simp_rw [maximal_iff, and_iff_right hB, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨_, h, disjoint_sdiff_right⟩,
fun I hI B' ⟨hB', hIB'⟩ hBI ↦ hBI.antisymm ?_⟩, fun ⟨⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩,h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [hB'.eq_of_subset_isBase h, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl] at hIB'
· exact fun e he ↦ (hIB' he).elim (fun h' ↦ (h' (hI he)).elim) id
rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right hB'.subset_ground, disjoint_comm]
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hBI hIB'
rw [h diff_subset B' ⟨hB', disjoint_sdiff_left⟩]
· simpa [hB'.subset_ground]
simp [subset_diff, hB, hBB']
end IsBase
section dep_indep
/-- A subset of `M.E` is `Dep`endent if it is not `Indep`endent . -/
def Dep (M : Matroid α) (D : Set α) : Prop := ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E
variable {B B' I J D X : Set α} {e f : α}
theorem indep_iff : M.Indep I ↔ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
M.indep_iff' (I := I)
theorem setOf_indep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {I | M.Indep I} = lowerClosure ({B | M.IsBase B}) := by
simp_rw [indep_iff, lowerClosure, LowerSet.coe_mk, mem_setOf, le_eq_subset]
theorem Indep.exists_isBase_superset (hI : M.Indep I) : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
indep_iff.1 hI
theorem dep_iff : M.Dep D ↔ ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E := Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_dep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {D | M.Dep D} = {I | M.Indep I}ᶜ ∩ Iic M.E := rfl
@[aesop unsafe 30% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Indep.subset_ground (hI : M.Indep I) : I ⊆ M.E := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hIB.trans hB.subset_ground
@[aesop unsafe 20% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Dep.subset_ground (hD : M.Dep D) : D ⊆ M.E :=
hD.2
theorem indep_or_dep (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep X ∨ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
apply em
theorem Indep.not_dep (hI : M.Indep I) : ¬ M.Dep I :=
fun h ↦ h.1 hI
theorem Dep.not_indep (hD : M.Dep D) : ¬ M.Indep D :=
hD.1
theorem dep_of_not_indep (hD : ¬ M.Indep D) (hDE : D ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep D :=
⟨hD, hDE⟩
theorem indep_of_not_dep (hI : ¬ M.Dep I) (hIE : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep I :=
by_contra (fun h ↦ hI ⟨h, hIE⟩)
@[simp] theorem not_dep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Dep X ↔ M.Indep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX, not_not]
@[simp] theorem not_indep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Indep X ↔ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
theorem indep_iff_not_dep : M.Indep I ↔ ¬M.Dep I ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
rw [dep_iff, not_and, not_imp_not]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ h, h.subset_ground⟩, fun h ↦ h.1 h.2⟩
theorem Indep.subset (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J) : M.Indep I := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hJB⟩ := hJ.exists_isBase_superset
exact indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, hIJ.trans hJB⟩
theorem Dep.superset (hD : M.Dep D) (hDX : D ⊆ X) (hXE : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep X :=
dep_of_not_indep (fun hI ↦ (hI.subset hDX).not_dep hD)
theorem IsBase.indep (hB : M.IsBase B) : M.Indep B :=
indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, subset_rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem empty_indep (M : Matroid α) : M.Indep ∅ :=
Exists.elim M.exists_isBase (fun _ hB ↦ hB.indep.subset (empty_subset _))
theorem Dep.nonempty (hD : M.Dep D) : D.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact hD.not_indep M.empty_indep
theorem Indep.finite [RankFinite M] (hI : M.Indep I) : I.Finite :=
let ⟨_, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hB.finite.subset hIB
theorem Indep.rankPos_of_nonempty (hI : M.Indep I) (hne : I.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hB.rankPos_of_nonempty (hne.mono hIB)
theorem Indep.inter_right (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I ∩ X) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_left
theorem Indep.inter_left (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (X ∩ I) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_right
theorem Indep.diff (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I \ X) :=
hI.subset diff_subset
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hI : M.Indep I) (hBI : B ⊆ I) : B = I :=
let ⟨B', hB', hB'I⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hBI.antisymm (by rwa [hB.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' (hBI.trans hB'I)])
theorem isBase_iff_maximal_indep : M.IsBase B ↔ Maximal M.Indep B := by
rw [maximal_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.indep, fun _ ↦ h.eq_of_subset_indep⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩ := h.exists_isBase_superset
rwa [h' hB'.indep hBB']
theorem Indep.isBase_of_maximal (hI : M.Indep I) (h : ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → I = J) :
M.IsBase I := by
rwa [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff, and_iff_right hI]
theorem IsBase.dep_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B ⊂ X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep X :=
⟨fun hX ↦ h.ne (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hX h.subset), hX⟩
theorem IsBase.dep_of_insert (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) (he : e ∈ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep (insert e B) := hB.dep_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) (insert_subset he hB.subset_ground)
theorem IsBase.mem_of_insert_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : M.Indep (insert e B)) : e ∈ B :=
by_contra fun he ↦ (hB.dep_of_insert he (heB.subset_ground (mem_insert _ _))).not_indep heB
/-- If the difference of two IsBases is a singleton, then they differ by an insertion/removal -/
theorem IsBase.eq_exchange_of_diff_eq_singleton (hB : M.IsBase B) (hB' : M.IsBase B')
(h : B \ B' = {e}) : ∃ f ∈ B' \ B, B' = (insert f B) \ {e} := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hb⟩ := hB.exchange hB' (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton e))
have hne : f ≠ e := by rintro rfl; exact hf.2 (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton f)).1
rw [insert_diff_singleton_comm hne] at hb
refine ⟨f, hf, (hb.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' ?_).symm⟩
rw [diff_subset_iff, insert_subset_iff, union_comm, ← diff_subset_iff, h, and_iff_left rfl.subset]
exact Or.inl hf.1
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f (B \ {e}))) : M.IsBase (insert f (B \ {e})) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
have hcard := hB'.encard_diff_comm hB
rw [insert_subset_iff, ← diff_eq_empty, diff_diff_comm, diff_eq_empty, subset_singleton_iff_eq]
at hIB'
obtain ⟨hfB, (h | h)⟩ := hIB'
· rw [h, encard_empty, encard_eq_zero, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] at hcard
exact (hcard f ⟨hfB, hf⟩).elim
rw [h, encard_singleton, encard_eq_one] at hcard
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hcard
obtain (rfl : f = x) := hx.subset ⟨hfB, hf⟩
simp_rw [← h, ← singleton_union, ← hx, sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_eq_inter, inter_comm B,
diff_union_inter]
exact hB'
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep' (hB : M.IsBase B) (he : e ∈ B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f B \ {e})) : M.IsBase (insert f B \ {e}) := by
have hfe : f ≠ e := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem he hf |>.symm
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm hfe] at *
exact hB.exchange_isBase_of_indep hf hI
lemma insert_isBase_of_insert_indep {M : Matroid α} {I : Set α} {e f : α}
(he : e ∉ I) (hf : f ∉ I) (heI : M.IsBase (insert e I)) (hfI : M.Indep (insert f I)) :
M.IsBase (insert f I) := by
obtain rfl | hef := eq_or_ne e f
· assumption
simpa [diff_singleton_eq_self he, hfI]
using heI.exchange_isBase_of_indep (e := e) (f := f) (by simp [hef.symm, hf])
theorem IsBase.insert_dep (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : e ∈ M.E \ B) : M.Dep (insert e B) := by
rw [← not_indep_iff (insert_subset h.1 hB.subset_ground)]
exact h.2 ∘ (fun hi ↦ insert_eq_self.mp (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hi (subset_insert e B)).symm)
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (hI : M.Indep I) (hI' : ¬M.IsBase I) (hB : M.IsBase B) :
∃ e ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
obtain ⟨x, hxB', hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (hIB'.ssubset_of_ne (by (rintro rfl; exact hI' hB')))
by_cases hxB : x ∈ B
· exact ⟨x, ⟨hxB, hx⟩, hB'.indep.subset (insert_subset hxB' hIB')⟩
obtain ⟨e,he, hBase⟩ := hB'.exchange hB ⟨hxB',hxB⟩
exact ⟨e, ⟨he.1, not_mem_subset hIB' he.2⟩,
indep_iff.2 ⟨_, hBase, insert_subset_insert (subset_diff_singleton hIB' hx)⟩⟩
/-- This is the same as `Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase`, but phrased so that
it is defeq to the augmentation axiom for independent sets. -/
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_maximal (M : Matroid α) ⦃I B : Set α⦄ (hI : M.Indep I)
(hInotmax : ¬ Maximal M.Indep I) (hB : Maximal M.Indep B) :
∃ x ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert x I) := by
simp only [maximal_subset_iff, hI, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, true_imp_iff] at hB hInotmax
refine hI.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (fun hIb ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hne⟩ := hInotmax
exact hne <| hIb.eq_of_subset_indep hII' hI'
exact hB.1.isBase_of_maximal fun J hJ hBJ ↦ hB.2 hJ hBJ
theorem Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (hB : M.Indep B)
(hBmax : ∀ e ∈ M.E \ B, ¬ M.Indep (insert e B)) : M.IsBase B := by
refine by_contra fun hnb ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨B', hB'⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨e, he, h⟩ := hB.exists_insert_of_not_isBase hnb hB'
exact hBmax e ⟨hB'.subset_ground he.1, he.2⟩ h
theorem ground_indep_iff_isBase : M.Indep M.E ↔ M.IsBase M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.isBase_of_maximal (fun _ hJ hEJ ↦ hEJ.antisymm hJ.subset_ground), IsBase.indep⟩
theorem IsBase.exists_insert_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (hIB : I ⊂ B) (hB' : M.IsBase B') :
∃ e ∈ B' \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) :=
(hB.indep.subset hIB.subset).exists_insert_of_not_isBase
(fun hI ↦ hIB.ne (hI.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hIB.subset)) hB'
@[ext] theorem ext_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I)) : M₁ = M₂ :=
have h' : M₁.Indep = M₂.Indep := by
ext I
by_cases hI : I ⊆ M₁.E
· rwa [h]
exact iff_of_false (fun hi ↦ hI hi.subset_ground)
(fun hi ↦ hI (hi.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm))
ext_isBase hE (fun B _ ↦ by simp_rw [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, h'])
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_indep
theorem ext_iff_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ (M₁.E = M₂.E) ∧ ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by (subst h; simp), fun h ↦ ext_indep h.1 h.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_iff_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_iff_indep
/-- If every base of `M₁` is independent in `M₂` and vice versa, then `M₁ = M₂`. -/
lemma ext_isBase_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(hM₁ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₁.IsBase B → M₂.Indep B) (hM₂ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₂.IsBase B → M₁.Indep B) : M₁ = M₂ := by
refine ext_indep hE fun I hIE ↦ ⟨fun hI ↦ ?_, fun hI ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₁ hB).subset hIB
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₂ hB).subset hIB
/-- A `Finitary` matroid is one where a set is independent if and only if it all
its finite subsets are independent, or equivalently a matroid whose circuits are finite. -/
@[mk_iff] class Finitary (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- `I` is independent if all its finite subsets are independent. -/
indep_of_forall_finite : ∀ I, (∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) → M.Indep I
theorem indep_of_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] (I : Set α)
(h : ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) : M.Indep I :=
Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I h
theorem indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] :
M.Indep I ↔ ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J :=
⟨fun h _ hJI _ ↦ h.subset hJI, Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I⟩
instance finitary_of_rankFinite {M : Matroid α} [RankFinite M] : Finitary M where
indep_of_forall_finite I hI := by
refine I.finite_or_infinite.elim (hI _ Subset.rfl) (fun h ↦ False.elim ?_)
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀I, hI₀fin, hI₀card⟩ := h.exists_subset_ncard_eq (B.ncard + 1)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hI₀B'⟩ := (hI _ hI₀I hI₀fin).exists_isBase_superset
have hle := ncard_le_ncard hI₀B' hB'.finite
rw [hI₀card, hB'.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase hB, Nat.add_one_le_iff] at hle
exact hle.ne rfl
/-- Matroids obey the maximality axiom -/
theorem existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (M : Matroid α) :
∀ X, X ⊆ M.E → ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty M.Indep X :=
M.maximality
end dep_indep
section copy
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with independence and base predicates and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps] def copy (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase Indep : Set α → Prop) (hE : E = M.E)
(hB : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) (hI : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α where
E := E
IsBase := IsBase
Indep := Indep
indep_iff' _ := by simp_rw [hI, hB, M.indep_iff]
exists_isBase := by
simp_rw [hB]
exact M.exists_isBase
isBase_exchange := by
simp_rw [show IsBase = M.IsBase from funext (by simp [hB])]
exact M.isBase_exchange
maximality := by
simp_rw [hE, show Indep = M.Indep from funext (by simp [hI])]
exact M.maximality
subset_ground := by
simp_rw [hE, hB]
exact M.subset_ground
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with an independence predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyIndep (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E M.IsBase Indep hE (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl) h
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with a base predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyBase (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E IsBase M.Indep hE h (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl)
end copy
section IsBasis
/-- A Basis for a set `X ⊆ M.E` is a maximal independent subset of `X`
(Often in the literature, the word 'Basis' is used to refer to what we call a 'Base'). -/
def IsBasis (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I ∧ X ⊆ M.E
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis := IsBasis
/-- `Matroid.IsBasis' I X` is the same as `Matroid.IsBasis I X`,
without the requirement that `X ⊆ M.E`. This is convenient for some
API building, especially when working with rank and closure. -/
def IsBasis' (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis' := IsBasis'
variable {B I J X Y : Set α} {e : α}
theorem IsBasis'.indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1
theorem IsBasis.indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1.1
theorem IsBasis.subset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : I ⊆ X :=
hI.1.1.2
theorem IsBasis.isBasis' (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.IsBasis' I X :=
hI.1
theorem IsBasis'.isBasis (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.IsBasis I X :=
⟨hI, hX⟩
theorem IsBasis'.subset (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : I ⊆ X :=
hI.1.2
@[aesop unsafe 15% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBasis.subset_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hI.2
theorem IsBasis.isBasis_inter_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) := by
convert hI
rw [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hI.subset_ground]
@[aesop unsafe 15% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBasis.left_subset_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : I ⊆ M.E :=
hI.indep.subset_ground
theorem IsBasis.eq_of_subset_indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J)
(hJX : J ⊆ X) : I = J :=
| hIJ.antisymm (hI.1.2 ⟨hJ, hJX⟩ hIJ)
theorem IsBasis.Finite (hI : M.IsBasis I X) [RankFinite M] : I.Finite := hI.indep.finite
theorem isBasis_iff' :
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 859 | 863 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_self {x y : R} (h : ↑n ∣ x - y) :
↑n ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub h).mpr (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (p x : R) (n : ℕ) :
p ^ 2 ∣ (x + p) ^ n - x ^ (n - 1) * p * n - x ^ n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, sub_zero, sub_self, dvd_zero, mul_zero]
· simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, Nat.cast_succ, add_pow, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Nat.choose_self, Nat.succ_sub _, tsub_self, pow_one, Nat.choose_succ_self_right, pow_zero,
mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_left]
suffices p ^ 2 ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * p ^ (n + 1 - i) * ↑((n + 1).choose i) by
convert this; abel
apply Finset.dvd_sum
intro y hy
calc
p ^ 2 ∣ p ^ (n + 1 - y) :=
pow_dvd_pow p (le_tsub_of_add_le_left (by linarith [Finset.mem_range.mp hy]))
_ ∣ x ^ y * p ^ (n + 1 - y) * ↑((n + 1).choose y) :=
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left _ _) _
theorem not_dvd_geom_sum₂ {p : R} (hp : Prime p) (hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
¬p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := fun h =>
hx <|
hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow <| (hp.dvd_or_dvd <| (dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' hxy).mp h).resolve_left hn
variable {p : ℕ} (a b)
theorem odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub (hp : Odd p) :
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + p * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) - p * a ^ (p - 1) := by
have h1 : ∀ (i : ℕ),
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * i + a ^ i) := by
intro i
calc
↑p ^ 2 ∣ (↑p * b) ^ 2 := by simp only [mul_pow, dvd_mul_right]
_ ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) := by
simp only [sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (↑p * b) a i, ← sub_sub]
simp_rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at *
let s : R := (p : R)^2
calc
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (span {s})) (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + (p : R) * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range p,
mk (span {s}) ((a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [s, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, ← map_pow, h1, ← map_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x))) := by
ring_nf
simp_rw [← map_sum, sum_add_distrib, map_add]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ _x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 1)) := by
rw [add_right_inj]
have : ∀ (x : ℕ), (hx : x ∈ range p) → a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x)) = a ^ (p - 1) := by
intro x hx
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc _ x, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx)
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl this]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [add_right_inj, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s}) (↑p * b * ∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 2) * x) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_add]
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl]
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨x⟩) hx
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· have : x.succ - 1 + (p - 1 - x.succ) = p - 2 := by
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx))]
exact congr_arg Nat.pred (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left _ _)
rw [this]
ring1
_ = mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
have : Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : R)) =
((Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : ℕ)))) := by simp only [Nat.cast_sum]
simp only [add_eq_right, ← Finset.mul_sum, this]
norm_cast
simp only [Finset.sum_range_id]
norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_mul, map_mul,
Nat.mul_div_assoc p (even_iff_two_dvd.mp (Nat.Odd.sub_odd hp odd_one))]
ring_nf
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left ?_ _
refine Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr ?_
simp [s, mem_span_singleton]
section IntegralDomain
variable [IsDomain R]
theorem emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime {p : R} (hp : Prime p) {x y : R}
(hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
emultiplicity p (x ^ n - y ^ n) = emultiplicity p (x - y) := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, emultiplicity_mul hp,
emultiplicity_eq_zero.2 (not_dvd_geom_sum₂ hp hxy hx hn), zero_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_sub_pow_of_prime := emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime
| variable (hp : Prime (p : R)) (hp1 : Odd p) (hxy : ↑p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x)
include hp hp1 hxy hx
theorem emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 155 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
/-! # Ordinal exponential
In this file we define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals. The two are
related by the lemma `Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x` for nontrivial inputs
`b`, `c`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion.
We call this `opow` in theorems in order to disambiguate from other exponentials. -/
instance instPow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b ↦ if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2⟩
private theorem opow_of_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b =
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2 :=
if_neg h
/-- `0 ^ a = 1` if `a = 0` and `0 ^ a = 0` otherwise. -/
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
if_pos rfl
theorem zero_opow_le (a : Ordinal) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [zero_opow']
exact sub_le_self 1 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero b), mul_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_succ]
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = ⨆ x : Iio b, a ^ x.1 := by
simp_rw [opow_of_ne_zero ha, limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ hb]
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by
rw [opow_limit a0 h, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Subtype.forall]
rfl
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]
simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]
simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero]
| succ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| isLimit b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero => exact h0
| succ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| isLimit b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
@[simp]
theorem opow_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ^ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp
· simp [hb]
· simp [opow_ne_zero b ha, ha]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem opow_natCast (a : Ordinal) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n : Ordinal) = a ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, opow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n IH => rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ, pow_succ, IH]
theorem isNormal_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).lt_iff
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_iff
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).inj
theorem isLimit_opow {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(isNormal_opow a1).isLimit
theorem isLimit_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact isLimit_mul (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact isLimit_opow l.one_lt l'
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| succ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| isLimit c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
theorem opow_le_opow {a b c d : Ordinal} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : a ^ b ≤ c ^ d :=
(opow_le_opow_left b hac).trans (opow_le_opow_right hc hbd)
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
rcases le_or_gt a 1 with a1 | a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow]
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
theorem left_lt_opow {a b : Ordinal} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a < a ^ b := by
conv_lhs => rw [← opow_one a]
rwa [opow_lt_opow_iff_right ha]
theorem right_le_opow {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_apply
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : Ordinal} (ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c := by
rw [opow_succ, opow_succ]
exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((Ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab)))
theorem opow_add (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | a0)
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | c0)
· simp
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne'
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with (rfl | a1)
· simp only [one_opow, mul_one]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp
| succ c IH =>
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
| isLimit c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((isNormal_opow a1).trans (isNormal_add_right b)).limit_le l).trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp +contextual only [IH]
exact
(((isNormal_mul_right <| opow_pos b (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(isNormal_opow a1)).limit_le
l).symm
theorem opow_one_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b := by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
⟨a ^ (c - b), by rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]⟩
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) <|
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 <| a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
theorem opow_mul (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 | a1
· subst a1
simp only [one_opow]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((isNormal_opow a1).trans (isNormal_mul_right (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le
l).trans
?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp +contextual only [IH]
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm
theorem opow_mul_add_pos {b v : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) (u : Ordinal) (hv : v ≠ 0) (w : Ordinal) :
0 < b ^ u * v + w :=
(opow_pos u <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb).trans_le <|
(le_mul_left _ <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hv).trans <| le_add_right _ _
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ {b u w : Ordinal} (v : Ordinal) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ u * succ v := by
rwa [mul_succ, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ {b u v w : Ordinal} (hvb : v < b) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ succ u := by
convert (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ v hw).trans_le
(mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt hvb) _) using 1
exact opow_succ b u
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation `x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and
`w < b ^ u`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
| def log (b : Ordinal) (x : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if 1 < b then pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) else 0
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 270 | 271 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
/-!
# Internally graded rings and algebras
This module provides `DirectSum.GSemiring` and `DirectSum.GCommSemiring` instances for a collection
of subobjects `A` when a `SetLike.GradedMonoid` instance is available:
* `SetLike.gnonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`
* `SetLike.gsemiring`
* `SetLike.gcommSemiring`
With these instances in place, it provides the bundled canonical maps out of a direct sum of
subobjects into their carrier type:
* `DirectSum.coeRingHom` (a `RingHom` version of `DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom`)
* `DirectSum.coeAlgHom` (an `AlgHom` version of `DirectSum.coeLinearMap`)
Strictly the definitions in this file are not sufficient to fully define an "internal" direct sum;
to represent this case, `(h : DirectSum.IsInternal A) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]` is
needed. In the future there will likely be a data-carrying, constructive, typeclass version of
`DirectSum.IsInternal` for providing an explicit decomposition function.
When `iSupIndep (Set.range A)` (a weaker condition than
`DirectSum.IsInternal A`), these provide a grading of `⨆ i, A i`, and the
mapping `⨁ i, A i →+ ⨆ i, A i` can be obtained as
`DirectSum.toAddMonoid (fun i ↦ AddSubmonoid.inclusion <| le_iSup A i)`.
This file also provides some extra structure on `A 0`, namely:
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subsemiring`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instSemiring`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instCommSemiring`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subring`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instRing`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instCommRing`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subalgebra`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instAlgebra`
## Tags
internally graded ring
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι : Type*} {σ S R : Type*}
theorem SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded [Zero ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (s : S) : algebraMap S R s ∈ A 0 := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact (A 0).smul_mem s <| SetLike.one_mem_graded _
theorem SetLike.natCast_mem_graded [Zero ι] [AddMonoidWithOne R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (n : ℕ) : (n : R) ∈ A 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
rw [Nat.cast_zero]
exact zero_mem (A 0)
| succ _ n_ih =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
exact add_mem n_ih (SetLike.one_mem_graded _)
theorem SetLike.intCast_mem_graded [Zero ι] [AddGroupWithOne R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (z : ℤ) : (z : R) ∈ A 0 := by
cases z
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast]
exact SetLike.natCast_mem_graded _ _
· rw [Int.cast_negSucc]
exact neg_mem (SetLike.natCast_mem_graded _ _)
section DirectSum
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-! #### From `AddSubmonoid`s and `AddSubgroup`s -/
namespace SetLike
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` instance for a collection of additive
submonoids. -/
instance gnonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [Add ι] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedMul A] :
DirectSum.GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gMul A with
mul_zero := fun _ => Subtype.ext (mul_zero _)
zero_mul := fun _ => Subtype.ext (zero_mul _)
mul_add := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (mul_add _ _ _)
add_mul := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (add_mul _ _ _) }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GSemiring` instance for a collection of additive submonoids. -/
instance gsemiring [AddMonoid ι] [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GSemiring fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gMonoid A with
mul_zero := fun _ => Subtype.ext (mul_zero _)
zero_mul := fun _ => Subtype.ext (zero_mul _)
mul_add := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (mul_add _ _ _)
add_mul := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (add_mul _ _ _)
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, SetLike.natCast_mem_graded _ _⟩
natCast_zero := Subtype.ext Nat.cast_zero
natCast_succ := fun n => Subtype.ext (Nat.cast_succ n) }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GCommSemiring` instance for a collection of additive submonoids. -/
instance gcommSemiring [AddCommMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R]
(A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GCommSemiring fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gCommMonoid A, SetLike.gsemiring A with }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GRing` instance for a collection of additive subgroups. -/
instance gring [AddMonoid ι] [Ring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GRing fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gsemiring A with
intCast := fun z => ⟨z, SetLike.intCast_mem_graded _ _⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun _n => Subtype.ext <| Int.cast_natCast _
intCast_negSucc_ofNat := fun n => Subtype.ext <| Int.cast_negSucc n }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GCommRing` instance for a collection of additive submonoids. -/
instance gcommRing [AddCommMonoid ι] [CommRing R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GCommRing fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gCommMonoid A, SetLike.gring A with }
end SetLike
namespace DirectSum
section coe
variable [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
/-- The canonical ring isomorphism between `⨁ i, A i` and `R` -/
def coeRingHom [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : (⨁ i, A i) →+* R :=
DirectSum.toSemiring (fun i => AddSubmonoidClass.subtype (A i)) rfl fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The canonical ring isomorphism between `⨁ i, A i` and `R` -/
@[simp]
theorem coeRingHom_of [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (i : ι) (x : A i) :
(coeRingHom A : _ →+* R) (of (fun i => A i) i x) = x :=
DirectSum.toSemiring_of _ _ _ _ _
theorem coe_mul_apply [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
[∀ (i : ι) (x : A i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) :
((r * r') n : R) =
∑ ij ∈ r.support ×ˢ r'.support with ij.1 + ij.2 = n, (r ij.1 * r' ij.2 : R) := by
rw [mul_eq_sum_support_ghas_mul, DFinsupp.finset_sum_apply, AddSubmonoidClass.coe_finset_sum]
simp_rw [coe_of_apply, apply_ite, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, ← Finset.sum_filter, SetLike.coe_gMul]
theorem coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
[∀ (i : ι) (x : A i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) :
((r * r') n : R) = r.sum fun i ri => r'.sum fun j rj => if i + j = n then (ri * rj : R)
else 0 := by
rw [mul_eq_dfinsuppSum]
iterate 2 rw [DFinsupp.sum_apply, DFinsupp.sum, AddSubmonoidClass.coe_finset_sum]; congr; ext
dsimp only
split_ifs with h
· subst h
rw [of_eq_same]
rfl
· rw [of_eq_of_ne _ _ _ h]
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")]
alias coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsupp_sum := coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_aux [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] {i : ι} (r : A i)
(r' : ⨁ i, A i) {j n : ι} (H : ∀ x : ι, i + x = n ↔ x = j) :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = r * r' j := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, zero_mul, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
simp_rw [DFinsupp.sum, H, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with h
· rfl
rw [DFinsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, mul_zero]
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_aux [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι}
(r' : A i) {j n : ι} (H : ∀ x : ι, x + i = n ↔ x = j) :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = r j * r' := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum, DFinsupp.sum_comm]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, mul_zero, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
simp_rw [DFinsupp.sum, H, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with h
· rfl
rw [DFinsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, zero_mul]
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_add [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] {i : ι} (r : A i)
(r' : ⨁ i, A i) (j : ι) : ((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') (i + j) : R) = r * r' j :=
coe_of_mul_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => ⟨fun h => add_left_cancel h, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_add [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : ⨁ i, A i)
{i : ι} (r' : A i) (j : ι) : ((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') (j + i) : R) = r j * r' :=
coe_mul_of_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => ⟨fun h => add_right_cancel h, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_of_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : A 0)
(r' : ⨁ i, A i) (j : ι) : ((of (fun i => A i) 0 r * r') j : R) = r * r' j :=
coe_of_mul_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => by rw [zero_add]
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_of_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : ⨁ i, A i)
(r' : A 0) (j : ι) : ((r * of (fun i => A i) 0 r') j : R) = r j * r' :=
coe_mul_of_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => by rw [add_zero]
end coe
section CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [PartialOrder ι] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_of_not_le {i : ι} (r : A i) (r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, zero_mul, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
· rw [DFinsupp.sum, Finset.sum_ite_of_false, Finset.sum_const_zero]
exact fun x _ H => h ((self_le_add_right i x).trans_eq H)
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_of_not_le (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι} (r' : A i) (n : ι) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum, DFinsupp.sum_comm]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, mul_zero, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
· rw [DFinsupp.sum, Finset.sum_ite_of_false, Finset.sum_const_zero]
exact fun x _ H => h ((self_le_add_left i x).trans_eq H)
variable [Sub ι] [OrderedSub ι] [AddLeftReflectLE ι]
/- The following two lemmas only require the same hypotheses as `eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le`, but we
state them for the above typeclasses for convenience. -/
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_of_le (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι} (r' : A i) (n : ι) (h : i ≤ n) :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = r (n - i) * r' :=
coe_mul_of_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => (eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le h).symm
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_of_le {i : ι} (r : A i) (r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) (h : i ≤ n) :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = r * r' (n - i) :=
coe_of_mul_apply_aux _ _ _ fun x => by rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le h, add_comm]
theorem coe_mul_of_apply (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι} (r' : A i) (n : ι) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = if i ≤ n then (r (n - i) : R) * r' else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [coe_mul_of_apply_of_le _ _ _ n h, coe_mul_of_apply_of_not_le _ _ _ n h]
theorem coe_of_mul_apply {i : ι} (r : A i) (r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = if i ≤ n then (r * r' (n - i) : R) else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [coe_of_mul_apply_of_le _ _ _ n h, coe_of_mul_apply_of_not_le _ _ _ n h]
end CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
end DirectSum
/-! #### From `Submodule`s -/
namespace Submodule
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GAlgebra` instance for a collection of `Submodule`s. -/
instance galgebra [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R] (A : ι → Submodule S R)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GAlgebra S fun i => A i where
toFun :=
((Algebra.linearMap S R).codRestrict (A 0) <| SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded A).toAddMonoidHom
map_one := Subtype.ext <| (algebraMap S R).map_one
| map_mul _x _y := Sigma.subtype_ext (add_zero 0).symm <| (algebraMap S R).map_mul _ _
commutes := fun _r ⟨i, _xi⟩ =>
Sigma.subtype_ext ((zero_add i).trans (add_zero i).symm) <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def := fun _r ⟨i, _xi⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext (zero_add i).symm <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Internal.lean | 280 | 283 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Pointwise
/-!
# Infinite sums and products in topological groups
Lemmas on topological sums in groups (as opposed to monoids).
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section IsTopologicalGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalGroup α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
-- `by simpa using` speeds up elaboration. Why?
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.inv (h : HasProd f a) : HasProd (fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) a⁻¹ := by
simpa only using h.map (MonoidHom.id α)⁻¹ continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.inv (hf : Multipliable f) : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹ :=
hf.hasProd.inv.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.of_inv (hf : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) : Multipliable f := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using hf.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_inv_iff : (Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨Multipliable.of_inv, Multipliable.inv⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.div (hf : HasProd f a₁) (hg : HasProd g a₂) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b / g b) (a₁ / a₂) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.trans_div (hg : Multipliable g) (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f := by
simpa only [div_mul_cancel] using hfg.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_iff_of_multipliable_div (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.trans_div <| by simpa only [inv_div] using hfg.inv, fun hg ↦ hg.trans_div hfg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.update (hf : HasProd f a₁) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
HasProd (update f b a) (a / f b * a₁) := by
convert (hasProd_ite_eq b (a / f b)).mul hf with b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· rw [h, update_self]
simp [eq_self_iff_true, if_true, sub_add_cancel]
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, if_false, Ne, one_mul, not_false_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.update (hf : Multipliable f) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
Multipliable (update f b a) :=
(hf.hasProd.update b a).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) a₂ ↔ HasProd f (a₁ * a₂) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ hf.mul_compl h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at hf ⊢
rw [Set.mulIndicator_compl]
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_comm] using h.div hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_iff_compl {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd f a₂ ↔ HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) (a₂ / a₁) :=
Iff.symm <| hf.hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f where
mp := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_compl_iff.1 ha).multipliable
mpr := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_iff_compl.1 ha).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd f (a * ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_iff_compl (s : Finset β) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) (a / ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_iff_compl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
(Multipliable fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(s.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.Finite.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(hs.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_div_hasProd [DecidableEq β] (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) :
HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) (a / f b) := by
convert hf.update b 1 using 1
· ext n
rw [Function.update_apply]
· rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul]
/-- A more general version of `Multipliable.congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set.
Note that this requires the target to be a group, and hence fails for products valued
in a ring. See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite₀` for a version applying in this case,
with an additional non-vanishing hypothesis.
-/
@[to_additive "A more general version of `Summable.congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr_cofinite (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : f =ᶠ[cofinite] g) :
Multipliable g :=
hfg.multipliable_compl_iff.mp <| (hfg.multipliable_compl_iff.mpr hf).congr (by simp)
/-- A more general version of `multipliable_congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "A more general version of `summable_congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr_cofinite (hfg : f =ᶠ[cofinite] g) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.congr_cofinite hfg, fun h ↦ h.congr_cofinite (hfg.mono fun _ h' ↦ h'.symm)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.congr_atTop {f₁ g₁ : ℕ → α} (hf : Multipliable f₁) (hfg : f₁ =ᶠ[atTop] g₁) :
Multipliable g₁ := hf.congr_cofinite (Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hfg)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_congr_atTop {f₁ g₁ : ℕ → α} (hfg : f₁ =ᶠ[atTop] g₁) :
Multipliable f₁ ↔ Multipliable g₁ := multipliable_congr_cofinite (Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hfg)
section tprod
variable [T2Space α]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_inv : ∏' b, (f b)⁻¹ = (∏' b, f b)⁻¹ := by
by_cases hf : Multipliable f
· exact hf.hasProd.inv.tprod_eq
· simp [tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable hf,
tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable (mt Multipliable.of_inv hf)]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.tprod_div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
∏' b, (f b / g b) = (∏' b, f b) / ∏' b, g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).tprod_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_sub := Summable.tsum_sub
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_div :=
Multipliable.tprod_div
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.prod_mul_tprod_compl {s : Finset β} (hf : Multipliable f) :
(∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏' x : ↑(s : Set β)ᶜ, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
((s.hasProd f).mul_compl (s.multipliable_compl_iff.2 hf).hasProd).tprod_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias sum_add_tsum_compl := Summable.sum_add_tsum_compl
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias prod_mul_tprod_compl :=
Multipliable.prod_mul_tprod_compl
/-- Let `f : β → α` be a multipliable function and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite` writes `∏ n, f n` as `f b` times the product of the
remaining terms. -/
@[to_additive "Let `f : β → α` be a summable function and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite` writes `Σ' n, f n` as `f b` plus the sum of the
remaining terms."]
protected theorem Multipliable.tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite [DecidableEq β] (hf : Multipliable f)
(b : β) : ∏' n, f n = f b * ∏' n, ite (n = b) 1 (f n) := by
rw [(hasProd_ite_div_hasProd hf.hasProd b).tprod_eq]
exact (mul_div_cancel _ _).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite := Summable.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite :=
Multipliable.tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite
end tprod
end IsTopologicalGroup
section IsUniformGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [UniformSpace α]
/-- The **Cauchy criterion** for infinite products, also known as the **Cauchy convergence test** -/
@[to_additive "The **Cauchy criterion** for infinite sums, also known as the
**Cauchy convergence test**"]
theorem multipliable_iff_cauchySeq_finset [CompleteSpace α] {f : β → α} :
Multipliable f ↔ CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
classical exact cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
variable [IsUniformGroup α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → (∏ b ∈ t, f b) ∈ e := by
classical
simp only [CauchySeq, cauchy_map_iff, and_iff_right atTop_neBot, prod_atTop_atTop_eq,
uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one α, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def, atTop_neBot, true_and]
rw [tendsto_atTop']
constructor
· intro h e he
obtain ⟨⟨s₁, s₂⟩, h⟩ := h e he
use s₁ ∪ s₂
intro t ht
specialize h (s₁ ∪ s₂, s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ t) ⟨le_sup_left, le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_right⟩
simpa only [Finset.prod_union ht.symm, mul_div_cancel_left] using h
· rintro h e he
rcases exists_nhds_split_inv he with ⟨d, hd, hde⟩
rcases h d hd with ⟨s, h⟩
use (s, s)
rintro ⟨t₁, t₂⟩ ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
have : ((∏ b ∈ t₂, f b) / ∏ b ∈ t₁, f b) = (∏ b ∈ t₂ \ s, f b) / ∏ b ∈ t₁ \ s, f b := by
rw [← Finset.prod_sdiff ht₁, ← Finset.prod_sdiff ht₂, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
simp only [this]
exact hde _ (h _ Finset.sdiff_disjoint) _ (h _ Finset.sdiff_disjoint)
@[to_additive]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_tprod_vanishing :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t : Set β, Disjoint t s → (∏' b : t, f b) ∈ e := by
simp_rw [cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing, Set.disjoint_left, disjoint_left]
refine ⟨fun vanish e he ↦ ?_, fun vanish e he ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨o, ho, o_closed, oe⟩ := exists_mem_nhds_isClosed_subset he
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := vanish o ho
refine ⟨s, fun t hts ↦ oe ?_⟩
by_cases ht : Multipliable fun a : t ↦ f a
· classical
| refine o_closed.mem_of_tendsto ht.hasProd (Eventually.of_forall fun t' ↦ ?_)
rw [← prod_subtype_map_embedding fun _ _ ↦ by rfl]
apply hs
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Group.lean | 256 | 258 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Continuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Normed groups are uniform groups
This file proves lipschitzness of normed group operations and shows that normed groups are uniform
groups.
-/
variable {𝓕 E F : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] {s : Set E} {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_right : IsIsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
| theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Uniform.lean | 74 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee, Óscar Álvarez
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Length
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Reflections, inversions, and inversion sequences
Throughout this file, `B` is a type and `M : CoxeterMatrix B` is a Coxeter matrix.
`cs : CoxeterSystem M W` is a Coxeter system; that is, `W` is a group, and `cs` holds the data
of a group isomorphism `W ≃* M.group`, where `M.group` refers to the quotient of the free group on
`B` by the Coxeter relations given by the matrix `M`. See `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean`
for more details.
We define a *reflection* (`CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`) to be an element of the form
$t = u s_i u^{-1}$, where $u \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. We say that a reflection $t$
is a *left inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`) of an element $w \in W$ if
$\ell(t w) < \ell(w)$, and we say it is a *right inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`) of
$w$ if $\ell(w t) > \ell(w)$. Here $\ell$ is the length function
(see `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Length.lean`).
Given a word, we define its *left inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`) and its
*right inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`). We prove that if a word is reduced, then
both of its inversion sequences contain no duplicates. In fact, the right (respectively, left)
inversion sequence of a reduced word for $w$ consists of all of the right (respectively, left)
inversions of $w$ in some order, but we do not prove that in this file.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`
* `CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`
## References
* [A. Björner and F. Brenti, *Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups*](bjorner2005)
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CoxeterSystem
open List Matrix Function
variable {B : Type*}
variable {W : Type*} [Group W]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
local prefix:100 "ℓ" => cs.length
/-- `t : W` is a *reflection* of the Coxeter system `cs` if it is of the form
$w s_i w^{-1}$, where $w \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. -/
def IsReflection (t : W) : Prop := ∃ w i, t = w * s i * w⁻¹
theorem isReflection_simple (i : B) : cs.IsReflection (s i) := by use 1, i; simp
namespace IsReflection
variable {cs}
variable {t : W} (ht : cs.IsReflection t)
include ht
theorem pow_two : t ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp
theorem mul_self : t * t = 1 := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp
theorem inv : t⁻¹ = t := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem isReflection_inv : cs.IsReflection t⁻¹ := by rwa [ht.inv]
theorem odd_length : Odd (ℓ t) := by
suffices cs.lengthParity t = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 by
simpa [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, ZMod.eq_one_iff_odd]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem length_mul_left_ne (w : W) : ℓ (w * t) ≠ ℓ w := by
suffices cs.lengthParity (w * t) ≠ cs.lengthParity w by
contrapose! this
simp only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, this]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem length_mul_right_ne (w : W) : ℓ (t * w) ≠ ℓ w := by
suffices cs.lengthParity (t * w) ≠ cs.lengthParity w by
contrapose! this
simp only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, this]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem conj (w : W) : cs.IsReflection (w * t * w⁻¹) := by
obtain ⟨u, i, rfl⟩ := ht
use w * u, i
group
end IsReflection
@[simp]
theorem isReflection_conj_iff (w t : W) :
cs.IsReflection (w * t * w⁻¹) ↔ cs.IsReflection t := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa [← mul_assoc] using h.conj w⁻¹
· exact IsReflection.conj (w := w)
/-- The proposition that `t` is a right inversion of `w`; i.e., `t` is a reflection and
$\ell (w t) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsRightInversion (w t : W) : Prop := cs.IsReflection t ∧ ℓ (w * t) < ℓ w
/-- The proposition that `t` is a left inversion of `w`; i.e., `t` is a reflection and
$\ell (t w) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsLeftInversion (w t : W) : Prop := cs.IsReflection t ∧ ℓ (t * w) < ℓ w
theorem isRightInversion_inv_iff {w t : W} :
cs.IsRightInversion w⁻¹ t ↔ cs.IsLeftInversion w t := by
apply and_congr_right
intro ht
rw [← length_inv, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, ht.inv, cs.length_inv w]
theorem isLeftInversion_inv_iff {w t : W} :
cs.IsLeftInversion w⁻¹ t ↔ cs.IsRightInversion w t := by
convert cs.isRightInversion_inv_iff.symm
simp
namespace IsReflection
variable {cs}
variable {t : W} (ht : cs.IsReflection t)
include ht
theorem isRightInversion_mul_left_iff {w : W} :
cs.IsRightInversion (w * t) t ↔ ¬cs.IsRightInversion w t := by
unfold IsRightInversion
simp only [mul_assoc, ht.inv, ht.mul_self, mul_one, ht, true_and, not_lt]
constructor
· exact le_of_lt
· exact (lt_of_le_of_ne' · (ht.length_mul_left_ne w))
theorem not_isRightInversion_mul_left_iff {w : W} :
¬cs.IsRightInversion (w * t) t ↔ cs.IsRightInversion w t :=
ht.isRightInversion_mul_left_iff.not_left
theorem isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff {w : W} :
cs.IsLeftInversion (t * w) t ↔ ¬cs.IsLeftInversion w t := by
rw [← isRightInversion_inv_iff, ← isRightInversion_inv_iff, mul_inv_rev, ht.inv,
ht.isRightInversion_mul_left_iff]
theorem not_isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff {w : W} :
¬cs.IsLeftInversion (t * w) t ↔ cs.IsLeftInversion w t :=
ht.isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff.not_left
end IsReflection
@[simp]
| theorem isRightInversion_simple_iff_isRightDescent (w : W) (i : B) :
cs.IsRightInversion w (s i) ↔ cs.IsRightDescent w i := by
simp [IsRightInversion, IsRightDescent, cs.isReflection_simple i]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Inversion.lean | 170 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual, Ico_toDual] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual, Icc_toDual] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inter_Icc_eq_singleton (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∩ Icc b c = {b} := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Iic_inter_Ici, inter_inter_inter_comm, Iic_inter_Ici]
simp [hab, hbc]
lemma Icc_eq_Icc_iff {d : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
Icc a b = Icc c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
| refine ⟨fun heq ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
have h' : c ≤ d := by
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 840 | 841 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
/-!
# Topological groups
This file defines the following typeclasses:
* `IsTopologicalGroup`, `IsTopologicalAddGroup`: multiplicative and additive topological groups,
i.e., groups with continuous `(*)` and `(⁻¹)` / `(+)` and `(-)`;
* `ContinuousSub G` means that `G` has a continuous subtraction operation.
There is an instance deducing `ContinuousSub` from `IsTopologicalGroup` but we use a separate
typeclass because, e.g., `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0` have continuous subtraction but are not additive groups.
We also define `Homeomorph` versions of several `Equiv`s: `Homeomorph.mulLeft`,
`Homeomorph.mulRight`, `Homeomorph.inv`, and prove a few facts about neighbourhood filters in
groups.
## Tags
topological space, group, topological group
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function Topology MulOpposite Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {G : Type w} {H : Type x} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### Groups with continuous multiplication
In this section we prove a few statements about groups with continuous `(*)`.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Multiplication from the left in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the left in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulLeft (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.coe_mulLeft (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulLeft a) = (a * ·) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulLeft_symm (a : G) : (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).symm = Homeomorph.mulLeft a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma isOpenMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsOpenMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.left_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_left x _ h
@[to_additive]
lemma isClosedMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsClosedMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.left_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_left x _ h
/-- Multiplication from the right in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the right in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulRight (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulRight a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_mulRight (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulRight a) = (· * a) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulRight_symm (a : G) :
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).symm = Homeomorph.mulRight a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsOpenMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.right_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (op x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsClosedMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.right_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (op x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one (h : IsOpen ({1} : Set G)) :
DiscreteTopology G := by
rw [← singletons_open_iff_discrete]
intro g
suffices {g} = (g⁻¹ * ·) ⁻¹' {1} by
rw [this]
exact (continuous_mul_left g⁻¹).isOpen_preimage _ h
simp only [mul_one, Set.preimage_mul_left_singleton, eq_self_iff_true, inv_inv,
Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_iff_isOpen_singleton_one : DiscreteTopology G ↔ IsOpen ({1} : Set G) :=
⟨fun h => forall_open_iff_discrete.mpr h {1}, discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one⟩
end ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### `ContinuousInv` and `ContinuousNeg`
-/
section ContinuousInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [ContinuousInv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.induced {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [Group α]
[DivisionMonoid β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [ContinuousInv β] (f : F) :
@ContinuousInv α (tβ.induced f) _ := by
let _tα := tβ.induced f
refine ⟨continuous_induced_rng.2 ?_⟩
simp only [Function.comp_def, map_inv]
fun_prop
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.inv {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : (x⁻¹) ⤳ (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.inv {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) : Inseparable (x⁻¹) (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : ∀ m : ℤ, (x ^ m) ⤳ (y ^ m)
| .ofNat n => by simpa using h.pow n
| .negSucc n => by simpa using (h.pow (n + 1)).inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) (m : ℤ) :
Inseparable (x ^ m) (y ^ m) :=
(h.specializes.zpow m).antisymm (h.specializes'.zpow m)
@[to_additive]
instance : ContinuousInv (ULift G) :=
⟨continuous_uliftUp.comp (continuous_inv.comp continuous_uliftDown)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_inv {s : Set G} : ContinuousOn Inv.inv s :=
continuous_inv.continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inv {s : Set G} {x : G} : ContinuousWithinAt Inv.inv s x :=
continuous_inv.continuousWithinAt
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_inv {x : G} : ContinuousAt Inv.inv x :=
continuous_inv.continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv (a : G) : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a⁻¹) :=
continuousAt_inv
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instContinuousInv : ContinuousInv Gᵒᵈ := ‹ContinuousInv G›
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.continuousInv [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] :
ContinuousInv (G × H) :=
⟨continuous_inv.fst'.prodMk continuous_inv.snd'⟩
variable {ι : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.continuousInv {C : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (C i)] [∀ i, Inv (C i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousInv (C i)] : ContinuousInv (∀ i, C i) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
/-- A version of `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. It is needed because sometimes
Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions. It is needed
because sometimes Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions."]
instance Pi.has_continuous_inv' : ContinuousInv (ι → G) :=
Pi.continuousInv
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) continuousInv_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H]
[DiscreteTopology H] : ContinuousInv H :=
⟨continuous_of_discreteTopology⟩
section PointwiseLimits
variable (G₁ G₂ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G₂] [T2Space G₂]
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosed_setOf_map_inv [Inv G₁] [Inv G₂] [ContinuousInv G₂] :
IsClosed { f : G₁ → G₂ | ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹ } := by
simp only [setOf_forall]
exact isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_eq (continuous_apply _) (continuous_apply _).inv
end PointwiseLimits
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] : ContinuousNeg (Additive H) where
continuous_neg := @continuous_inv H _ _ _
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Neg H] [ContinuousNeg H] : ContinuousInv (Multiplicative H) where
continuous_inv := @continuous_neg H _ _ _
end ContinuousInv
section ContinuousInvolutiveInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] {s : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.inv (hs : IsCompact s) : IsCompact s⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv_eq_inv]
exact hs.image continuous_inv
variable (G)
/-- Inversion in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Negation in a topological group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.inv (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G]
[ContinuousInv G] : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.inv G with
continuous_toFun := continuous_inv
continuous_invFun := continuous_inv }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_inv {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] :
⇑(Homeomorph.inv G) = Inv.inv := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_inv (a : G) : 𝓝 a⁻¹ = (𝓝 a)⁻¹ :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq a).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_inv : IsOpenMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_inv : IsClosedMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isClosedMap
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOpen.inv (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem IsClosed.inv (hs : IsClosed s) : IsClosed s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_closure : ∀ s : Set G, (closure s)⁻¹ = closure s⁻¹ :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).preimage_closure
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuous_inv_iff : Continuous f⁻¹ ↔ Continuous f := (Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuous_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousAt_inv_iff : ContinuousAt f⁻¹ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousAt_iff _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousOn_inv_iff : ContinuousOn f⁻¹ s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Continuous.of_inv, _⟩ := continuous_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousAt.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousAt_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousOn.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousOn_inv_iff
end ContinuousInvolutiveInv
section LatticeOps
variable {ι' : Sort*} [Inv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_sInf {ts : Set (TopologicalSpace G)}
(h : ∀ t ∈ ts, @ContinuousInv G t _) : @ContinuousInv G (sInf ts) _ :=
letI := sInf ts
{ continuous_inv :=
continuous_sInf_rng.2 fun t ht =>
continuous_sInf_dom ht (@ContinuousInv.continuous_inv G t _ (h t ht)) }
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_iInf {ts' : ι' → TopologicalSpace G}
(h' : ∀ i, @ContinuousInv G (ts' i) _) : @ContinuousInv G (⨅ i, ts' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact continuousInv_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace G} (h₁ : @ContinuousInv G t₁ _)
(h₂ : @ContinuousInv G t₂ _) : @ContinuousInv G (t₁ ⊓ t₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine continuousInv_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
end LatticeOps
@[to_additive]
theorem Topology.IsInducing.continuousInv {G H : Type*} [Inv G] [Inv H] [TopologicalSpace G]
[TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousInv H] {f : G → H} (hf : IsInducing f)
(hf_inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) : ContinuousInv G :=
⟨hf.continuous_iff.2 <| by simpa only [Function.comp_def, hf_inv] using hf.continuous.inv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.continuousInv := IsInducing.continuousInv
section IsTopologicalGroup
/-!
### Topological groups
A topological group is a group in which the multiplication and inversion operations are
continuous. Topological additive groups are defined in the same way. Equivalently, we can require
that the division operation `x y ↦ x * y⁻¹` (resp., subtraction) is continuous.
-/
section Conj
instance ConjAct.units_continuousConstSMul {M} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] : ContinuousConstSMul (ConjAct Mˣ) M :=
⟨fun _ => (continuous_const.mul continuous_id).mul continuous_const⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [Mul G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `mul` and `inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive continuous_addConj_prod
"Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj_prod [ContinuousInv G] :
Continuous fun g : G × G => g.fst * g.snd * g.fst⁻¹ :=
continuous_mul.mul (continuous_inv.comp continuous_fst)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_conj_sum := IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_addConj_prod
/-- Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `mul` is continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `add` is continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj (g : G) : Continuous fun h : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right g⁻¹).comp (continuous_mul_left g)
/-- Conjugation acting on fixed element of the group is continuous when both `mul` and
`inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation acting on fixed element of the additive group is continuous when both
`add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj' [ContinuousInv G] (h : G) :
Continuous fun g : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right h).mul continuous_inv
end Conj
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G}
{s : Set α} {x : α}
instance : IsTopologicalGroup (ULift G) where
section ZPow
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem continuous_zpow : ∀ z : ℤ, Continuous fun a : G => a ^ z
| Int.ofNat n => by simpa using continuous_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => by simpa using (continuous_pow (n + 1)).inv
instance AddGroup.continuousConstSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousConstSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_zsmul⟩
instance AddGroup.continuousSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_prod_of_discrete_left.mpr continuous_zsmul⟩
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem Continuous.zpow {f : α → G} (h : Continuous f) (z : ℤ) : Continuous fun b => f b ^ z :=
(continuous_zpow z).comp h
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_zpow {s : Set G} (z : ℤ) : ContinuousOn (fun x => x ^ z) s :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_zpow (x : G) (z : ℤ) : ContinuousAt (fun x => x ^ z) x :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.zpow {α} {l : Filter α} {f : α → G} {x : G} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
(z : ℤ) : Tendsto (fun x => f x ^ z) l (𝓝 (x ^ z)) :=
(continuousAt_zpow _ _).tendsto.comp hf
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(z : ℤ) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ z) s x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x ^ z) x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousOn.zpow {f : α → G} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x ^ z) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).zpow z
end ZPow
section OrderedCommGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [CommGroup H] [PartialOrder H] [IsOrderedMonoid H] [ContinuousInv H]
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) (𝓝[<] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) (𝓝[>] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a) (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a) (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≤] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≥] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv
end OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.instIsTopologicalGroup [TopologicalSpace H] [Group H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] :
IsTopologicalGroup (G × H) where
continuous_inv := continuous_inv.prodMap continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instIsTopologicalGroup : IsTopologicalGroup Gᵒᵈ where
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.topologicalGroup {C : β → Type*} [∀ b, TopologicalSpace (C b)] [∀ b, Group (C b)]
[∀ b, IsTopologicalGroup (C b)] : IsTopologicalGroup (∀ b, C b) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] [ContinuousInv α] : ContinuousInv αᵐᵒᵖ :=
opHomeomorph.symm.isInducing.continuousInv unop_inv
/-- If multiplication is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[to_additive "If addition is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵃᵒᵖ`."]
instance [Group α] [IsTopologicalGroup α] : IsTopologicalGroup αᵐᵒᵖ where
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm : comap Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).comap_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm' : map Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_nhds_one {S : Set G} (hS : S ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G)) : S⁻¹ ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := by
rwa [← nhds_one_symm'] at hS
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x * y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping."]
protected def Homeomorph.shearMulRight : G × G ≃ₜ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
continuous_toFun := by dsimp; fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by dsimp; fun_prop }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G) = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_symm_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G).symm = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2) :=
rfl
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.topologicalGroup {F : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G] (f : F) (hf : IsInducing f) : IsTopologicalGroup H :=
{ toContinuousMul := hf.continuousMul _
toContinuousInv := hf.continuousInv (map_inv f) }
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.topologicalGroup := IsInducing.topologicalGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_induced {F : Type*} [Group H] [FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G]
(f : F) :
@IsTopologicalGroup H (induced f ‹_›) _ :=
letI := induced f ‹_›
IsInducing.topologicalGroup f ⟨rfl⟩
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance (S : Subgroup G) : IsTopologicalGroup S :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.topologicalGroup S.subtype
end Subgroup
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a subgroup of a topological group is
itself a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The (topological-space) closure of an additive subgroup of an additive topological group is
itself an additive subgroup."]
def Subgroup.topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
carrier := _root_.closure (s : Set G)
inv_mem' := fun {g} hg => by simpa only [← Set.mem_inv, inv_closure, inv_coe_set] using hg }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe {s : Subgroup G} :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.le_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
_root_.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set G) := isClosed_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Subgroup G) {t : Subgroup G} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set G)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
@[to_additive]
theorem DenseRange.topologicalClosure_map_subgroup [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[IsTopologicalGroup H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Continuous f) (hf' : DenseRange f) {s : Subgroup G}
(hs : s.topologicalClosure = ⊤) : (s.map f).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff] at hs ⊢
simp only [Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe, Subgroup.coe_top, ← dense_iff_closure_eq] at hs ⊢
exact hf'.dense_image hf hs
/-- The topological closure of a normal subgroup is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The topological closure of a normal additive subgroup is normal."]
theorem Subgroup.is_normal_topologicalClosure {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] (N : Subgroup G) [N.Normal] :
(Subgroup.topologicalClosure N).Normal where
conj_mem n hn g := by
apply map_mem_closure (IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj g) hn
exact fun m hm => Subgroup.Normal.conj_mem inferInstance m hm g
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [MulOneClass G]
[ContinuousMul G] {g h : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G))
(hh : h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) : g * h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [connectedComponent_eq hg]
have hmul : g ∈ connectedComponent (g * h) := by
apply Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset (continuous_mul_left g)
rw [← connectedComponent_eq hh]
exact ⟨(1 : G), mem_connectedComponent, by simp only [mul_one]⟩
simpa [← connectedComponent_eq hmul] using mem_connectedComponent
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [DivisionMonoid G]
[ContinuousInv G] {g : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) :
g⁻¹ ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [← inv_one]
exact
Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset continuous_inv _
((Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩)
/-- The connected component of 1 is a subgroup of `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The connected component of 0 is a subgroup of `G`."]
def Subgroup.connectedComponentOfOne (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] : Subgroup G where
carrier := connectedComponent (1 : G)
one_mem' := mem_connectedComponent
mul_mem' hg hh := mul_mem_connectedComponent_one hg hh
inv_mem' hg := inv_mem_connectedComponent_one hg
/-- If a subgroup of a topological group is commutative, then so is its topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[to_additive
"If a subgroup of an additive topological group is commutative, then so is its
topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]."]
abbrev Subgroup.commGroupTopologicalClosure [T2Space G] (s : Subgroup G)
(hs : ∀ x y : s, x * y = y * x) : CommGroup s.topologicalClosure :=
{ s.topologicalClosure.toGroup, s.toSubmonoid.commMonoidTopologicalClosure hs with }
variable (G) in
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.coe_topologicalClosure_bot :
((⊥ : Subgroup G).topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure ({1} : Set G) := by simp
@[to_additive exists_nhds_half_neg]
theorem exists_nhds_split_inv {s : Set G} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G)) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), ∀ v ∈ V, ∀ w ∈ V, v / w ∈ s := by
have : (fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2⁻¹) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 ((1, 1) : G × G) :=
continuousAt_fst.mul continuousAt_snd.inv (by simpa)
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_self_iff, prod_subset_iff, mem_preimage] using
this
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_translation_mul_inv (x : G) : comap (· * x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight x⁻¹).comap_nhds_eq 1).trans <| show 𝓝 (1 * x⁻¹⁻¹) = 𝓝 x by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds (x y : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (x * y) :=
(Homeomorph.mulLeft x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds_one (x : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds (x y : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (y * x) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds_one (x : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_of_one {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set G}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓝 1 : Filter G) p s) (x : G) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) p fun i => { y | y / x ∈ s i } := by
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv]
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hb.comap _
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_one {x : G} {s : Set G} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ U ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G), ∃ y ∈ s, y / x ∈ U := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis ((𝓝 1 : Filter G).basis_sets.nhds_of_one x)]
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, id]
/-- A monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements `MonoidHomClass`) from a
topological group to a topological monoid is continuous provided that it is continuous at one. See
also `uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements
`AddMonoidHomClass`) from an additive topological group to an additive topological monoid is
continuous provided that it is continuous at zero. See also
`uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero`."]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one {M hom : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [FunLike hom G M] [MonoidHomClass hom G M] (f : hom)
(hf : ContinuousAt f 1) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => by
simpa only [ContinuousAt, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def,
map_mul, map_one, mul_one] using hf.tendsto.const_mul (f x)
@[to_additive continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one₂ {H M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] (f : G →* H →* M)
(hf : ContinuousAt (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) (1, 1))
(hl : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (f x) 1) (hr : ∀ y, ContinuousAt (f · y) 1) :
Continuous (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) := continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun (x, y) => by
simp only [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one y,
prod_map_map_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, map_mul, MonoidHom.mul_apply] at *
refine ((tendsto_const_nhds.mul ((hr y).comp tendsto_fst)).mul
(((hl x).comp tendsto_snd).mul hf)).mono_right (le_of_eq ?_)
simp only [map_one, mul_one, MonoidHom.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsTopologicalGroup.isInducing_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] {F : Type*}
[FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
Topology.IsInducing f ↔ 𝓝 (1 : G) = (𝓝 (1 : H)).comap f := by
rw [Topology.isInducing_iff_nhds]
refine ⟨(map_one f ▸ · 1), fun hf x ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv, ← nhds_translation_mul_inv (f x), Filter.comap_comap, hf,
Filter.comap_comap]
congr 1
ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma TopologicalGroup.isOpenMap_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Monoid H] [TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousConstSMul H H]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ 𝓝 1 ≤ .map f (𝓝 1) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ map_one f ▸ H.nhds_le 1, fun h ↦ IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_⟩
have : Filter.map (f x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 (f x) := by
simpa [-Homeomorph.map_nhds_eq, Units.smul_def] using
(Homeomorph.smul ((toUnits x).map (MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom f))).map_nhds_eq (1 : H)
rw [← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def, ← this]
refine (Filter.map_mono h).trans ?_
simp [Function.comp_def]
-- TODO: unify with `QuotientGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk`
/-- Let `A` and `B` be topological groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous surjective group
homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map. -/
@[to_additive "Let `A` and `B` be topological additive groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous
surjective additive group homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map."]
lemma MonoidHom.isOpenQuotientMap_of_isQuotientMap {A : Type*} [Group A]
[TopologicalSpace A] [ContinuousMul A] {B : Type*} [Group B] [TopologicalSpace B]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [MonoidHomClass F A B] {φ : F}
(hφ : IsQuotientMap φ) : IsOpenQuotientMap φ where
surjective := hφ.surjective
continuous := hφ.continuous
isOpenMap := by
-- We need to check that if `U ⊆ A` is open then `φ⁻¹ (φ U)` is open.
intro U hU
rw [← hφ.isOpen_preimage]
-- It suffices to show that `φ⁻¹ (φ U) = ⋃ (U * k⁻¹)` as `k` runs through the kernel of `φ`,
-- as `U * k⁻¹` is open because `x ↦ x * k` is continuous.
-- Remark: here is where we use that we have groups not monoids (you cannot avoid
-- using both `k` and `k⁻¹` at this point).
suffices ⇑φ ⁻¹' (⇑φ '' U) = ⋃ k ∈ ker (φ : A →* B), (fun x ↦ x * k) ⁻¹' U by
exact this ▸ isOpen_biUnion (fun k _ ↦ Continuous.isOpen_preimage (by fun_prop) _ hU)
ext x
-- But this is an elementary calculation.
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hyU, hyx⟩
apply Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem (x⁻¹ * y)
simp_all
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, _, ⟨(hk : φ k = 1), rfl⟩, hx⟩
use x * k, hx
rw [map_mul, hk, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _)
(h : @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1) : t = t' :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t _ _ x, ← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t' _ _ x, ← h]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _) :
t = t' ↔ @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, tg.ext tg'⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one {G : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x : G => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (fun x : G => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : ContinuousInv G := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x₀ => ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x => x₀⁻¹ * (x₀ * x⁻¹ * x₀⁻¹)) (𝓝 1) (map (x₀⁻¹ * ·) (𝓝 1)) :=
(tendsto_map.comp <| hconj x₀).comp hinv
simpa only [ContinuousAt, hleft x₀, hleft x₀⁻¹, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, mul_assoc,
mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_left] using this
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hright : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x * x₀) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
{ toContinuousMul := ContinuousMul.of_nhds_one hmul hleft hright
toContinuousInv :=
ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one hinv hleft fun x₀ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [show (fun x => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) = (fun x => x * x₀⁻¹) ∘ fun x => x₀ * x from rfl, ←
map_map, ← hleft, hright, map_map]
simp [(· ∘ ·)]) }
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G := by
refine IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' hmul hinv hleft fun x₀ => ?_
replace hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, map (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 1 :=
fun x₀ => map_eq_of_inverse (x₀⁻¹ * · * x₀⁻¹⁻¹) (by ext; simp [mul_assoc]) (hconj _) (hconj _)
rw [← hconj x₀]
simpa [Function.comp_def] using hleft _
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_comm_of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [CommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one hmul hinv hleft (by simpa using tendsto_id)
variable (G) in
/-- Any first countable topological group has an antitone neighborhood basis `u : ℕ → Set G` for
which `(u (n + 1)) ^ 2 ⊆ u n`. The existence of such a neighborhood basis is a key tool for
`QuotientGroup.completeSpace` -/
@[to_additive
"Any first countable topological additive group has an antitone neighborhood basis
`u : ℕ → set G` for which `u (n + 1) + u (n + 1) ⊆ u n`.
The existence of such a neighborhood basis is a key tool for `QuotientAddGroup.completeSpace`"]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.exists_antitone_basis_nhds_one [FirstCountableTopology G] :
∃ u : ℕ → Set G, (𝓝 1).HasAntitoneBasis u ∧ ∀ n, u (n + 1) * u (n + 1) ⊆ u n := by
rcases (𝓝 (1 : G)).exists_antitone_basis with ⟨u, hu, u_anti⟩
have :=
((hu.prod_nhds hu).tendsto_iff hu).mp
(by simpa only [mul_one] using continuous_mul.tendsto ((1, 1) : G × G))
simp only [and_self_iff, mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, exists_true_left, Prod.exists,
forall_true_left] at this
have event_mul : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ m in atTop, u m * u m ⊆ u n := by
intro n
rcases this n with ⟨j, k, -, h⟩
refine atTop_basis.eventually_iff.mpr ⟨max j k, True.intro, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rintro - ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact h a b (u_anti ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm) ha) (u_anti ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm) hb)
obtain ⟨φ, -, hφ, φ_anti_basis⟩ := HasAntitoneBasis.subbasis_with_rel ⟨hu, u_anti⟩ event_mul
exact ⟨u ∘ φ, φ_anti_basis, fun n => hφ n.lt_succ_self⟩
end IsTopologicalGroup
section ContinuousDiv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Div G] [ContinuousDiv G]
@[to_additive const_sub]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.const_div' (b : G) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) : Tendsto (fun k : α => b / f k) l (𝓝 (b / c)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.div' h
@[to_additive]
lemma Filter.tendsto_const_div_iff {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousDiv G]
(b : G) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun k : α ↦ b / f k) l (𝓝 (b / c)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Filter.Tendsto.const_div' b⟩
convert h.const_div' b with k <;> rw [div_div_cancel]
@[to_additive sub_const]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div_const' {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 c))
(b : G) : Tendsto (f · / b) l (𝓝 (c / b)) :=
h.div' tendsto_const_nhds
lemma Filter.tendsto_div_const_iff {G : Type*}
[CommGroupWithZero G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousDiv G]
{b : G} (hb : b ≠ 0) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (f · / b) l (𝓝 (c / b)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Filter.Tendsto.div_const' h b⟩
convert h.div_const' b⁻¹ with k <;> rw [div_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hb, div_one]
lemma Filter.tendsto_sub_const_iff {G : Type*}
[AddCommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousSub G]
(b : G) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (f · - b) l (𝓝 (c - b)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Filter.Tendsto.sub_const h b⟩
convert h.sub_const (-b) with k <;> rw [sub_sub, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self, sub_zero]
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_sub_left]
lemma continuous_div_left' (a : G) : Continuous (a / ·) := continuous_const.div' continuous_id
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_sub_right]
lemma continuous_div_right' (a : G) : Continuous (· / a) := continuous_id.div' continuous_const
end ContinuousDiv
section DivInvTopologicalGroup
variable [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
/-- A version of `Homeomorph.mulLeft a b⁻¹` that is defeq to `a / b`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! +simpRhs)
"A version of `Homeomorph.addLeft a (-b)` that is defeq to `a - b`."]
def Homeomorph.divLeft (x : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.divLeft x with
continuous_toFun := continuous_const.div' continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_inv.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_div_left (a : G) : IsOpenMap (a / ·) :=
(Homeomorph.divLeft _).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_div_left (a : G) : IsClosedMap (a / ·) :=
(Homeomorph.divLeft _).isClosedMap
/-- A version of `Homeomorph.mulRight a⁻¹ b` that is defeq to `b / a`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! +simpRhs)
"A version of `Homeomorph.addRight (-a) b` that is defeq to `b - a`. "]
def Homeomorph.divRight (x : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.divRight x with
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.div' continuous_const
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive]
lemma isOpenMap_div_right (a : G) : IsOpenMap (· / a) := (Homeomorph.divRight a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
lemma isClosedMap_div_right (a : G) : IsClosedMap (· / a) := (Homeomorph.divRight a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_div_nhds_one_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : G} {u : α → G} :
Tendsto (u · / x) l (𝓝 1) ↔ Tendsto u l (𝓝 x) :=
haveI A : Tendsto (fun _ : α => x) l (𝓝 x) := tendsto_const_nhds
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.mul A, fun h => by simpa using h.div' A⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_translation_div (x : G) : comap (· / x) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using nhds_translation_mul_inv x
end DivInvTopologicalGroup
section FilterMul
section
variable (G) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.t1Space (h : @IsClosed G _ {1}) : T1Space G :=
⟨fun x => by simpa using isClosedMap_mul_right x _ h⟩
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
variable (S : Subgroup G) [Subgroup.Normal S] [IsClosed (S : Set G)]
/-- A subgroup `S` of a topological group `G` acts on `G` properly discontinuously on the left, if
it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact `K`. (See also
`DiscreteTopology`.) -/
@[to_additive
"A subgroup `S` of an additive topological group `G` acts on `G` properly
discontinuously on the left, if it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact
`K`. (See also `DiscreteTopology`."]
theorem Subgroup.properlyDiscontinuousSMul_of_tendsto_cofinite (S : Subgroup G)
(hS : Tendsto S.subtype cofinite (cocompact G)) : ProperlyDiscontinuousSMul S G :=
{ finite_disjoint_inter_image := by
intro K L hK hL
have H : Set.Finite _ := hS ((hL.prod hK).image continuous_div').compl_mem_cocompact
rw [preimage_compl, compl_compl] at H
convert H
ext x
simp only [image_smul, mem_setOf_eq, coe_subtype, mem_preimage, mem_image, Prod.exists]
exact Set.smul_inter_ne_empty_iff' }
/-- A subgroup `S` of a topological group `G` acts on `G` properly discontinuously on the right, if
it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact `K`. (See also
`DiscreteTopology`.)
If `G` is Hausdorff, this can be combined with `t2Space_of_properlyDiscontinuousSMul_of_t2Space`
to show that the quotient group `G ⧸ S` is Hausdorff. -/
@[to_additive
"A subgroup `S` of an additive topological group `G` acts on `G` properly discontinuously
on the right, if it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact `K`.
(See also `DiscreteTopology`.)
If `G` is Hausdorff, this can be combined with `t2Space_of_properlyDiscontinuousVAdd_of_t2Space`
to show that the quotient group `G ⧸ S` is Hausdorff."]
theorem Subgroup.properlyDiscontinuousSMul_opposite_of_tendsto_cofinite (S : Subgroup G)
(hS : Tendsto S.subtype cofinite (cocompact G)) : ProperlyDiscontinuousSMul S.op G :=
{ finite_disjoint_inter_image := by
intro K L hK hL
have : Continuous fun p : G × G => (p.1⁻¹, p.2) := continuous_inv.prodMap continuous_id
have H : Set.Finite _ :=
hS ((hK.prod hL).image (continuous_mul.comp this)).compl_mem_cocompact
simp only [preimage_compl, compl_compl, coe_subtype, comp_apply] at H
apply Finite.of_preimage _ (equivOp S).surjective
convert H using 1
ext x
simp only [image_smul, mem_setOf_eq, coe_subtype, mem_preimage, mem_image, Prod.exists]
exact Set.op_smul_inter_ne_empty_iff }
end
section
/-! Some results about an open set containing the product of two sets in a topological group. -/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [MulOneClass G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of `1`
such that `K * V ⊆ U`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of
`0` such that `K + V ⊆ U`."]
theorem compact_open_separated_mul_right {K U : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hKU : K ⊆ U) : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), K * V ⊆ U := by
refine hK.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨univ, by simp⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
exact ⟨V, hV, (mul_subset_mul_right hst).trans hV'⟩
· rintro s t ⟨V, V_in, hV'⟩ ⟨W, W_in, hW'⟩
use V ∩ W, inter_mem V_in W_in
rw [union_mul]
exact
union_subset ((mul_subset_mul_left V.inter_subset_left).trans hV')
((mul_subset_mul_left V.inter_subset_right).trans hW')
· intro x hx
have := tendsto_mul (show U ∈ 𝓝 (x * 1) by simpa using hU.mem_nhds (hKU hx))
rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩
rw [← image_subset_iff, image_mul_prod] at h
exact ⟨t, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ht, s, hs, h⟩
open MulOpposite
/-- Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of `1`
such that `V * K ⊆ U`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of
`0` such that `V + K ⊆ U`."]
theorem compact_open_separated_mul_left {K U : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hKU : K ⊆ U) : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), V * K ⊆ U := by
rcases compact_open_separated_mul_right (hK.image continuous_op) (opHomeomorph.isOpenMap U hU)
(image_subset op hKU) with
⟨V, hV : V ∈ 𝓝 (op (1 : G)), hV' : op '' K * V ⊆ op '' U⟩
refine ⟨op ⁻¹' V, continuous_op.continuousAt hV, ?_⟩
rwa [← image_preimage_eq V op_surjective, ← image_op_mul, image_subset_iff,
preimage_image_eq _ op_injective] at hV'
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
/-- A compact set is covered by finitely many left multiplicative translates of a set
with non-empty interior. -/
@[to_additive
"A compact set is covered by finitely many left additive translates of a set
with non-empty interior."]
theorem compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) : ∃ t : Finset G, K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (g * ·) ⁻¹' V := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ : ∃ t : Finset G, K ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, interior ((x * ·) ⁻¹' V) := by
refine
hK.elim_finite_subcover (fun x => interior <| (x * ·) ⁻¹' V) (fun x => isOpen_interior) ?_
obtain ⟨g₀, hg₀⟩ := hV
refine fun g _ => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨g₀ * g⁻¹, ?_⟩
refine preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage (continuous_const.mul continuous_id) ?_
rwa [mem_preimage, Function.id_def, inv_mul_cancel_right]
exact ⟨t, Subset.trans ht <| iUnion₂_mono fun g _ => interior_subset⟩
/-- Every weakly locally compact separable topological group is σ-compact.
Note: this is not true if we drop the topological group hypothesis. -/
@[to_additive SeparableWeaklyLocallyCompactAddGroup.sigmaCompactSpace
"Every weakly locally compact separable topological additive group is σ-compact.
Note: this is not true if we drop the topological group hypothesis."]
instance (priority := 100) SeparableWeaklyLocallyCompactGroup.sigmaCompactSpace [SeparableSpace G]
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace G] : SigmaCompactSpace G := by
obtain ⟨L, hLc, hL1⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds (1 : G)
refine ⟨⟨fun n => (fun x => x * denseSeq G n) ⁻¹' L, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· intro n
exact (Homeomorph.mulRight _).isCompact_preimage.mpr hLc
· refine iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨_, ⟨n, rfl⟩, hn⟩ : (range (denseSeq G) ∩ (fun y => x * y) ⁻¹' L).Nonempty := by
rw [← (Homeomorph.mulLeft x).apply_symm_apply 1] at hL1
exact (denseRange_denseSeq G).inter_nhds_nonempty
((Homeomorph.mulLeft x).continuous.continuousAt <| hL1)
exact ⟨n, hn⟩
/-- Given two compact sets in a noncompact topological group, there is a translate of the second
one that is disjoint from the first one. -/
@[to_additive
"Given two compact sets in a noncompact additive topological group, there is a
translate of the second one that is disjoint from the first one."]
theorem exists_disjoint_smul_of_isCompact [NoncompactSpace G] {K L : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hL : IsCompact L) : ∃ g : G, Disjoint K (g • L) := by
have A : ¬K * L⁻¹ = univ := (hK.mul hL.inv).ne_univ
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g ∉ K * L⁻¹ := by
contrapose! A
exact eq_univ_iff_forall.2 A
refine ⟨g, ?_⟩
refine disjoint_left.2 fun a ha h'a => hg ?_
rcases h'a with ⟨b, bL, rfl⟩
refine ⟨g * b, ha, b⁻¹, by simpa only [Set.mem_inv, inv_inv] using bL, ?_⟩
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel_right]
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_mul (x y : G) : 𝓝 (x * y) = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y :=
calc
𝓝 (x * y) = map (x * ·) (map (· * y) (𝓝 1 * 𝓝 1)) := by simp
_ = map₂ (fun a b => x * (a * b * y)) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1) := by rw [← map₂_mul, map_map₂, map_map₂]
_ = map₂ (fun a b => x * a * (b * y)) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1) := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y := by
rw [← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, ← map_mul_right_nhds_one y, ← map₂_mul, map₂_map_left,
map₂_map_right]
/-- On a topological group, `𝓝 : G → Filter G` can be promoted to a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"On an additive topological group, `𝓝 : G → Filter G` can be promoted to an `AddHom`."]
def nhdsMulHom : G →ₙ* Filter G where
toFun := 𝓝
map_mul' _ _ := nhds_mul _ _
end
end FilterMul
instance {G} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] :
IsTopologicalAddGroup (Additive G) where
continuous_neg := @continuous_inv G _ _ _
instance {G} [TopologicalSpace G] [AddGroup G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] :
IsTopologicalGroup (Multiplicative G) where
continuous_inv := @continuous_neg G _ _ _
/-- If `G` is a group with topological `⁻¹`, then it is homeomorphic to its units. -/
@[to_additive "If `G` is an additive group with topological negation, then it is homeomorphic to
its additive units."]
def toUnits_homeomorph [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousInv G] : G ≃ₜ Gˣ where
toEquiv := toUnits.toEquiv
continuous_toFun := Units.continuous_iff.2 ⟨continuous_id, continuous_inv⟩
continuous_invFun := Units.continuous_val
@[to_additive] theorem Units.isEmbedding_val [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousInv G] :
IsEmbedding (val : Gˣ → G) :=
toUnits_homeomorph.symm.isEmbedding
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Units.embedding_val := Units.isEmbedding_val
lemma Continuous.of_coeHom_comp [Group G] [Monoid H] [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalSpace H]
[ContinuousInv G] {f : G →* Hˣ} (hf : Continuous ((Units.coeHom H).comp f)) : Continuous f := by
apply continuous_induced_rng.mpr ?_
refine continuous_prodMk.mpr ⟨hf, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← map_inv]
exact MulOpposite.continuous_op.comp (hf.comp continuous_inv)
namespace Units
open MulOpposite (continuous_op continuous_unop)
variable [Monoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] [Monoid β] [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive]
instance [ContinuousMul α] : IsTopologicalGroup αˣ where
continuous_inv := Units.continuous_iff.2 <| ⟨continuous_coe_inv, continuous_val⟩
/-- The topological group isomorphism between the units of a product of two monoids, and the product
of the units of each monoid. -/
@[to_additive prodAddUnits
"The topological group isomorphism between the additive units of a product of two
additive monoids, and the product of the additive units of each additive monoid."]
def _root_.Homeomorph.prodUnits : (α × β)ˣ ≃ₜ αˣ × βˣ where
continuous_toFun :=
(continuous_fst.units_map (MonoidHom.fst α β)).prodMk
(continuous_snd.units_map (MonoidHom.snd α β))
continuous_invFun :=
Units.continuous_iff.2
⟨continuous_val.fst'.prodMk continuous_val.snd',
continuous_coe_inv.fst'.prodMk continuous_coe_inv.snd'⟩
toEquiv := MulEquiv.prodUnits.toEquiv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Homeomorph.sumAddUnits := Homeomorph.prodAddUnits
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias Homeomorph.prodUnits := Homeomorph.prodUnits
end Units
section LatticeOps
variable {ι : Sort*} [Group G]
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_sInf {ts : Set (TopologicalSpace G)}
(h : ∀ t ∈ ts, @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) : @IsTopologicalGroup G (sInf ts) _ :=
letI := sInf ts
{ toContinuousInv :=
@continuousInv_sInf _ _ _ fun t ht => @IsTopologicalGroup.toContinuousInv G t _ <| h t ht
toContinuousMul :=
@continuousMul_sInf _ _ _ fun t ht =>
@IsTopologicalGroup.toContinuousMul G t _ <| h t ht }
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_iInf {ts' : ι → TopologicalSpace G}
(h' : ∀ i, @IsTopologicalGroup G (ts' i) _) : @IsTopologicalGroup G (⨅ i, ts' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact topologicalGroup_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace G} (h₁ : @IsTopologicalGroup G t₁ _)
(h₂ : @IsTopologicalGroup G t₂ _) : @IsTopologicalGroup G (t₁ ⊓ t₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine topologicalGroup_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
end LatticeOps
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 1,987 | 1,989 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Union
/-!
# Finite sets in `Option α`
In this file we define
* `Option.toFinset`: construct an empty or singleton `Finset α` from an `Option α`;
* `Finset.insertNone`: given `s : Finset α`, lift it to a finset on `Option α` using `Option.some`
and then insert `Option.none`;
* `Finset.eraseNone`: given `s : Finset (Option α)`, returns `t : Finset α` such that
`x ∈ t ↔ some x ∈ s`.
Then we prove some basic lemmas about these definitions.
## Tags
finset, option
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
open Function
namespace Option
/-- Construct an empty or singleton finset from an `Option` -/
def toFinset (o : Option α) : Finset α :=
o.elim ∅ singleton
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_none : none.toFinset = (∅ : Finset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_some {a : α} : (some a).toFinset = {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinset {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ o.toFinset ↔ a ∈ o := by
cases o <;> simp [eq_comm]
theorem card_toFinset (o : Option α) : o.toFinset.card = o.elim 0 1 := by cases o <;> rfl
end Option
namespace Finset
/-- Given a finset on `α`, lift it to being a finset on `Option α`
using `Option.some` and then insert `Option.none`. -/
def insertNone : Finset α ↪o Finset (Option α) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff fun s => cons none (s.map Embedding.some) <| by simp) fun s t => by
rw [le_iff_subset, cons_subset_cons, map_subset_map, le_iff_subset]
@[simp]
theorem mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, o ∈ insertNone s ↔ ∀ a ∈ o, a ∈ s
| none => iff_of_true (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _) fun a h => by cases h
| some a => Multiset.mem_cons.trans <| by simp
lemma forall_mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} {p : Option α → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ insertNone s, p a) ↔ p none ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a := by simp [Option.forall]
theorem some_mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} {a : α} : some a ∈ insertNone s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp
lemma none_mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} : none ∈ insertNone s := by simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma insertNone_nonempty {s : Finset α} : insertNone s |>.Nonempty := ⟨none, none_mem_insertNone⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_insertNone (s : Finset α) : s.insertNone.card = s.card + 1 := by simp [insertNone]
/-- Given `s : Finset (Option α)`, `eraseNone s : Finset α` is the set of `x : α` such that
`some x ∈ s`. -/
def eraseNone : Finset (Option α) →o Finset α :=
(Finset.mapEmbedding (Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv α).toEmbedding).toOrderHom.comp
⟨Finset.subtype _, subtype_mono⟩
@[simp]
| theorem mem_eraseNone {s : Finset (Option α)} {x : α} : x ∈ eraseNone s ↔ some x ∈ s := by
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Option.lean | 87 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
| · constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 555 | 559 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.LimitsOfProductsAndEqualizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FintypeCat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.MonoCoprod
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ConcreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Diagonal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.SingleObj
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
/-!
# Definition and basic properties of Galois categories
We define the notion of a Galois category and a fiber functor as in SGA1, following
the definitions in Lenstras notes (see below for a reference).
## Main definitions
* `PreGaloisCategory` : defining properties of Galois categories not involving a fiber functor
* `FiberFunctor` : a fiber functor from a `PreGaloisCategory` to `FintypeCat`
* `GaloisCategory` : a `PreGaloisCategory` that admits a `FiberFunctor`
* `IsConnected` : an object of a category is connected if it is not initial
and does not have non-trivial subobjects
## Implementation details
We mostly follow Def 3.1 in Lenstras notes. In axiom (G3)
we omit the factorisation of morphisms in epimorphisms and monomorphisms
as this is not needed for the proof of the fundamental theorem on Galois categories
(and then follows from it).
## References
* [lenstraGSchemes]: H. W. Lenstra. Galois theory for schemes.
-/
universe u₁ u₂ v₁ v₂ w t
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits Functor
/-!
A category `C` is a PreGalois category if it satisfies all properties
of a Galois category in the sense of SGA1 that do not involve a fiber functor.
A Galois category should furthermore admit a fiber functor.
The only difference between `[PreGaloisCategory C] (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat) [FiberFunctor F]` and
`[GaloisCategory C]` is that the former fixes one fiber functor `F`.
-/
/-- Definition of a (Pre)Galois category. Lenstra, Def 3.1, (G1)-(G3) -/
class PreGaloisCategory (C : Type u₁) [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] : Prop where
/-- `C` has a terminal object (G1). -/
hasTerminal : HasTerminal C := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has pullbacks (G1). -/
hasPullbacks : HasPullbacks C := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has finite coproducts (G2). -/
hasFiniteCoproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has quotients by finite groups (G2). -/
hasQuotientsByFiniteGroups (G : Type u₂) [Group G] [Finite G] :
HasColimitsOfShape (SingleObj G) C := by infer_instance
/-- Every monomorphism in `C` induces an isomorphism on a direct summand (G3). -/
monoInducesIsoOnDirectSummand {X Y : C} (i : X ⟶ Y) [Mono i] : ∃ (Z : C) (u : Z ⟶ Y),
Nonempty (IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk i u))
namespace PreGaloisCategory
/-- Definition of a fiber functor from a Galois category. Lenstra, Def 3.1, (G4)-(G6) -/
class FiberFunctor {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] [PreGaloisCategory C]
(F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) where
/-- `F` preserves terminal objects (G4). -/
preservesTerminalObjects : PreservesLimitsOfShape (CategoryTheory.Discrete PEmpty.{1}) F := by
infer_instance
/-- `F` preserves pullbacks (G4). -/
preservesPullbacks : PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F := by infer_instance
/-- `F` preserves finite coproducts (G5). -/
preservesFiniteCoproducts : PreservesFiniteCoproducts F := by infer_instance
/-- `F` preserves epimorphisms (G5). -/
preservesEpis : Functor.PreservesEpimorphisms F := by infer_instance
/-- `F` preserves quotients by finite groups (G5). -/
preservesQuotientsByFiniteGroups (G : Type u₂) [Group G] [Finite G] :
PreservesColimitsOfShape (SingleObj G) F := by infer_instance
/-- `F` reflects isomorphisms (G6). -/
reflectsIsos : F.ReflectsIsomorphisms := by infer_instance
/-- An object of a category `C` is connected if it is not initial
and has no non-trivial subobjects. Lenstra, 3.12. -/
class IsConnected {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] (X : C) : Prop where
/-- `X` is not an initial object. -/
notInitial : IsInitial X → False
/-- `X` has no non-trivial subobjects. -/
noTrivialComponent (Y : C) (i : Y ⟶ X) [Mono i] : (IsInitial Y → False) → IsIso i
/-- A functor is said to preserve connectedness if whenever `X : C` is connected,
also `F.obj X` is connected. -/
class PreservesIsConnected {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] {D : Type v₁}
[Category.{v₂, v₁} D] (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
/-- `F.obj X` is connected if `X` is connected. -/
preserves : ∀ {X : C} [IsConnected X], IsConnected (F.obj X)
section
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] [PreGaloisCategory C]
attribute [instance] hasTerminal hasPullbacks hasFiniteCoproducts hasQuotientsByFiniteGroups
instance : HasFiniteLimits C := hasFiniteLimits_of_hasTerminal_and_pullbacks
instance : HasBinaryProducts C := hasBinaryProducts_of_hasTerminal_and_pullbacks C
instance : HasEqualizers C := hasEqualizers_of_hasPullbacks_and_binary_products
-- A `PreGaloisCategory` has quotients by finite groups in arbitrary universes. -/
instance {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] : HasColimitsOfShape (SingleObj G) C := by
obtain ⟨G', hg, hf, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_type_univ_nonempty_mulEquiv G
exact Limits.hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence e.toSingleObjEquiv.symm
end
namespace FiberFunctor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] {F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}} [PreGaloisCategory C]
[FiberFunctor F]
attribute [instance] preservesTerminalObjects preservesPullbacks preservesEpis
preservesFiniteCoproducts reflectsIsos preservesQuotientsByFiniteGroups
noncomputable instance : ReflectsLimitsOfShape (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) F :=
reflectsLimitsOfShape_of_reflectsIsomorphisms
noncomputable instance : ReflectsColimitsOfShape (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) F :=
reflectsColimitsOfShape_of_reflectsIsomorphisms
noncomputable instance : PreservesFiniteLimits F :=
preservesFiniteLimits_of_preservesTerminal_and_pullbacks F
/-- Fiber functors preserve quotients by finite groups in arbitrary universes. -/
instance {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] :
PreservesColimitsOfShape (SingleObj G) F := by
choose G' hg hf he using Finite.exists_type_univ_nonempty_mulEquiv G
exact Limits.preservesColimitsOfShape_of_equiv he.some.toSingleObjEquiv.symm F
/-- Fiber functors reflect monomorphisms. -/
instance : ReflectsMonomorphisms F := ReflectsMonomorphisms.mk <| by
intro X Y f _
haveI : IsIso (pullback.fst (F.map f) (F.map f)) :=
isIso_fst_of_mono (F.map f)
haveI : IsIso (F.map (pullback.fst f f)) := by
rw [← PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst]
exact IsIso.comp_isIso
haveI : IsIso (pullback.fst f f) := isIso_of_reflects_iso (pullback.fst _ _) F
exact (pullback.diagonal_isKernelPair f).mono_of_isIso_fst
/-- Fiber functors are faithful. -/
instance : F.Faithful where
map_injective {X Y} f g h := by
haveI : IsIso (equalizer.ι (F.map f) (F.map g)) := equalizer.ι_of_eq h
haveI : IsIso (F.map (equalizer.ι f g)) := by
rw [← equalizerComparison_comp_π f g F]
exact IsIso.comp_isIso
haveI : IsIso (equalizer.ι f g) := isIso_of_reflects_iso _ F
exact eq_of_epi_equalizer
section
/-- If `F` is a fiber functor and `E` is an equivalence between categories of finite types,
then `F ⋙ E` is again a fiber functor. -/
lemma comp_right (E : FintypeCat.{w} ⥤ FintypeCat.{t}) [E.IsEquivalence] :
FiberFunctor (F ⋙ E) where
preservesQuotientsByFiniteGroups _ := comp_preservesColimitsOfShape F E
end
end FiberFunctor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C]
(F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w})
/-- The canonical action of `Aut F` on the fiber of each object. -/
instance (X : C) : MulAction (Aut F) (F.obj X) where
smul σ x := σ.hom.app X x
one_smul _ := rfl
mul_smul _ _ _ := rfl
lemma mulAction_def {X : C} (σ : Aut F) (x : F.obj X) :
σ • x = σ.hom.app X x :=
rfl
lemma mulAction_naturality {X Y : C} (σ : Aut F) (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : F.obj X) :
σ • F.map f x = F.map f (σ • x) :=
FunctorToFintypeCat.naturality F F σ.hom f x
/-- An object that is neither initial or connected has a non-trivial subobject. -/
lemma has_non_trivial_subobject_of_not_isConnected_of_not_initial (X : C) (hc : ¬ IsConnected X)
(hi : IsInitial X → False) :
∃ (Y : C) (v : Y ⟶ X), (IsInitial Y → False) ∧ Mono v ∧ (¬ IsIso v) := by
contrapose! hc
exact ⟨hi, fun Y i hm hni ↦ hc Y i hni hm⟩
/-- The cardinality of the fiber is preserved under isomorphisms. -/
lemma card_fiber_eq_of_iso {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : Nat.card (F.obj X) = Nat.card (F.obj Y) := by
have e : F.obj X ≃ F.obj Y := Iso.toEquiv (mapIso (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) i)
exact Nat.card_eq_of_bijective e (Equiv.bijective e)
variable [PreGaloisCategory C] [FiberFunctor F]
/-- An object is initial if and only if its fiber is empty. -/
lemma initial_iff_fiber_empty (X : C) : Nonempty (IsInitial X) ↔ IsEmpty (F.obj X) := by
rw [(IsInitial.isInitialIffObj F X).nonempty_congr]
haveI : PreservesFiniteColimits (forget FintypeCat) := by
show PreservesFiniteColimits FintypeCat.incl
infer_instance
haveI : ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} _) (forget FintypeCat) := by
show ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} _) FintypeCat.incl
infer_instance
exact Concrete.initial_iff_empty_of_preserves_of_reflects (F.obj X)
/-- An object is not initial if and only if its fiber is nonempty. -/
lemma not_initial_iff_fiber_nonempty (X : C) : (IsInitial X → False) ↔ Nonempty (F.obj X) := by
rw [← not_isEmpty_iff]
refine ⟨fun h he ↦ ?_, fun h hin ↦ h <| (initial_iff_fiber_empty F X).mp ⟨hin⟩⟩
exact Nonempty.elim ((initial_iff_fiber_empty F X).mpr he) h
/-- An object whose fiber is inhabited is not initial. -/
lemma not_initial_of_inhabited {X : C} (x : F.obj X) (h : IsInitial X) : False :=
((initial_iff_fiber_empty F X).mp ⟨h⟩).false x
/-- The fiber of a connected object is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_fiber_of_isConnected (X : C) [IsConnected X] : Nonempty (F.obj X) := by
by_contra h
have ⟨hin⟩ : Nonempty (IsInitial X) := (initial_iff_fiber_empty F X).mpr (not_nonempty_iff.mp h)
exact IsConnected.notInitial hin
/-- The fiber of the equalizer of `f g : X ⟶ Y` is equivalent to the set of agreement of `f`
and `g`. -/
noncomputable def fiberEqualizerEquiv {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
F.obj (equalizer f g) ≃ { x : F.obj X // F.map f x = F.map g x } :=
(PreservesEqualizer.iso (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) f g ≪≫
Types.equalizerIso (F.map f) (F.map g)).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma fiberEqualizerEquiv_symm_ι_apply {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (x : F.obj X)
| (h : F.map f x = F.map g x) :
F.map (equalizer.ι f g) ((fiberEqualizerEquiv F f g).symm ⟨x, h⟩) = x := by
simp [fiberEqualizerEquiv]
change ((Types.equalizerIso _ _).inv ≫ _ ≫ (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl).map (equalizer.ι f g)) _ = _
erw [PreservesEqualizer.iso_inv_ι, Types.equalizerIso_inv_comp_ι]
/-- The fiber of the pullback is the fiber product of the fibers. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Galois/Basic.lean | 248 | 254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, George Shakan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, George Shakan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# The Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality
This file proves Ruzsa's triangle inequality, the Plünnecke-Petridis lemma, and the Plünnecke-Ruzsa
inequality.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.ruzsa_triangle_inequality_sub_sub_sub`: The Ruzsa triangle inequality, difference version.
* `Finset.ruzsa_triangle_inequality_add_add_add`: The Ruzsa triangle inequality, sum version.
* `Finset.pluennecke_petridis_inequality_add`: The Plünnecke-Petridis inequality.
* `Finset.pluennecke_ruzsa_inequality_nsmul_sub_nsmul_add`: The Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality.
## References
* [Giorgis Petridis, *The Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality: an overview*][petridis2014]
* [Terrence Tao, Van Vu, *Additive Combinatorics][tao-vu]
## See also
In general non-abelian groups, small doubling doesn't imply small powers anymore, but small tripling
does. See `Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.SmallTripling`.
-/
open MulOpposite Nat
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Finset
variable {G : Type*} [DecidableEq G]
section Group
variable [Group G] {A B C : Finset G}
/-! ### Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality -/
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Division version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Subtraction version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_div_div (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A / C) * #B ≤ #(A / B) * #(C / B) := by
rw [← card_product (A / B), ← mul_one #((A / B) ×ˢ (C / B))]
refine card_mul_le_card_mul (fun b (a, c) ↦ a / c = b) (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
fun x _ ↦ card_le_one_iff.2 fun hu hv ↦
((mem_bipartiteBelow _).1 hu).2.symm.trans ?_
· obtain ⟨a, ha, c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_div.1 hx
refine card_le_card_of_injOn (fun b ↦ (a / b, c / b)) (fun b hb ↦ ?_) fun b₁ _ b₂ _ h ↦ ?_
· rw [mem_bipartiteAbove]
exact ⟨mk_mem_product (div_mem_div ha hb) (div_mem_div hc hb), div_div_div_cancel_right ..⟩
· exact div_right_injective (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).1
· exact ((mem_bipartiteBelow _).1 hv).2
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Mulinv-mulinv-mulinv version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Addneg-addneg-addneg version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mulInv_mulInv_mulInv (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A * C⁻¹) * #B ≤ #(A * B⁻¹) * #(C * B⁻¹) := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_div_div A B C
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Invmul-invmul-invmul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Negadd-negadd-negadd version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_invMul_invMul_invMul (A B C : Finset G) :
#B * #(A⁻¹ * C) ≤ #(B⁻¹ * A) * #(B⁻¹ * C) := by
simpa [mul_comm, div_eq_mul_inv, ← map_op_mul, ← map_op_inv] using
ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_div_div (G := Gᵐᵒᵖ) (C.map opEquiv.toEmbedding)
(B.map opEquiv.toEmbedding) (A.map opEquiv.toEmbedding)
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Div-mul-mul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Sub-add-add version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_mul_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A / C) * #B ≤ #(A * B) * #(C * B) := by
simpa using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_div_div A B⁻¹ C
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Mulinv-mul-mul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Addneg-add-add version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mulInv_mul_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A * C⁻¹) * #B ≤ #(A * B) * #(C * B) := by
simpa using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mulInv_mulInv_mulInv A B⁻¹ C
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Invmul-mul-mul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Negadd-add-add version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_invMul_mul_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#B * #(A⁻¹ * C) ≤ #(B * A) * #(B * C) := by
simpa using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_invMul_invMul_invMul A B⁻¹ C
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Mul-div-mul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-sub-add version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_div_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#B * #(A * C) ≤ #(B / A) * #(B * C) := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_invMul_mul_mul A⁻¹ B C
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Mul-mulinv-mul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-addneg-add version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_mulInv_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#B * #(A * C) ≤ #(B * A⁻¹) * #(B * C) := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_div_mul A B C
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Mul-mul-invmul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-add-negadd version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_mul_invMul (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A * C) * #B ≤ #(A * B) * #(C⁻¹ * B) := by
simpa using ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mulInv_mul_mul A B C⁻¹
/-! ### Plünnecke-Petridis inequality -/
@[to_additive]
theorem pluennecke_petridis_inequality_mul (C : Finset G)
(hA : ∀ A' ⊆ A, #(A * B) * #A' ≤ #(A' * B) * #A) :
#(C * A * B) * #A ≤ #(A * B) * #(C * A) := by
induction C using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert x C _ ih =>
set A' := A ∩ ({x}⁻¹ * C * A) with hA'
set C' := insert x C with hC'
have h₀ : {x} * A' = {x} * A ∩ (C * A) := by
rw [hA', mul_assoc, singleton_mul_inter, (isUnit_singleton x).mul_inv_cancel_left]
have h₁ : C' * A * B = C * A * B ∪ ({x} * A * B) \ ({x} * A' * B) := by
rw [hC', insert_eq, union_comm, union_mul, union_mul]
refine (sup_sdiff_eq_sup ?_).symm
rw [h₀]
gcongr
exact inter_subset_right
have h₂ : {x} * A' * B ⊆ {x} * A * B := by gcongr; exact inter_subset_left
have h₃ : #(C' * A * B) ≤ #(C * A * B) + #(A * B) - #(A' * B) := by
rw [h₁]
refine (card_union_le _ _).trans_eq ?_
rw [card_sdiff h₂, ← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (card_le_card h₂), mul_assoc {_}, mul_assoc {_},
card_singleton_mul, card_singleton_mul]
refine (mul_le_mul_right' h₃ _).trans ?_
rw [tsub_mul, add_mul]
refine (tsub_le_tsub (add_le_add_right ih _) <| hA _ inter_subset_left).trans_eq ?_
rw [← mul_add, ← mul_tsub, ← hA', hC', insert_eq, union_mul, ← card_singleton_mul x A, ←
card_singleton_mul x A', add_comm #_, h₀, eq_tsub_of_add_eq (card_union_add_card_inter _ _)]
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup G] {A B C : Finset G}
/-! ### Commutative Ruzsa triangle inequality -/
-- Auxiliary lemma for Ruzsa's triangle sum inequality, and the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality.
@[to_additive]
private theorem mul_aux (hA : A.Nonempty) (hAB : A ⊆ B)
(h : ∀ A' ∈ B.powerset.erase ∅, (#(A * C) : ℚ≥0) / #A ≤ #(A' * C) / #A') :
∀ A' ⊆ A, #(A * C) * #A' ≤ #(A' * C) * #A := by
rintro A' hAA'
obtain rfl | hA' := A'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
have hA₀ : (0 : ℚ≥0) < #A := cast_pos.2 hA.card_pos
have hA₀' : (0 : ℚ≥0) < #A' := cast_pos.2 hA'.card_pos
exact mod_cast
(div_le_div_iff₀ hA₀ hA₀').1
(h _ <| mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hA'.ne_empty <| mem_powerset.2 <| hAA'.trans hAB)
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Multiplication version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Addition version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_mul_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A * C) * #B ≤ #(A * B) * #(B * C) := by
obtain rfl | hB := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
have hB' : B ∈ B.powerset.erase ∅ := mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hB.ne_empty (mem_powerset_self _)
obtain ⟨U, hU, hUA⟩ :=
exists_min_image (B.powerset.erase ∅) (fun U ↦ #(U * A) / #U : _ → ℚ≥0) ⟨B, hB'⟩
rw [mem_erase, mem_powerset, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at hU
refine cast_le.1 (?_ : (_ : ℚ≥0) ≤ _)
push_cast
rw [← le_div_iff₀ (cast_pos.2 hB.card_pos), mul_div_right_comm, mul_comm _ B]
refine (Nat.cast_le.2 <| card_le_card_mul_left hU.1).trans ?_
refine le_trans ?_
(mul_le_mul (hUA _ hB') (cast_le.2 <| card_le_card <| mul_subset_mul_right hU.2)
(zero_le _) (zero_le _))
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, ← mul_assoc, le_div_iff₀ (cast_pos.2 hU.1.card_pos), mul_comm _ C,
← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ C]
exact mod_cast pluennecke_petridis_inequality_mul C (mul_aux hU.1 hU.2 hUA)
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Mul-div-div version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-sub-sub version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_div_div (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A * C) * #B ≤ #(A / B) * #(B / C) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← card_inv B, ← card_inv (B / C), inv_div', div_inv_eq_mul]
exact ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_mul_mul _ _ _
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Div-mul-div version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Sub-add-sub version."]
theorem ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_mul_div (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A / C) * #B ≤ #(A * B) * #(B / C) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_mul_mul _ _ _
/-- **Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Div-div-mul version. -/
@[to_additive "**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Sub-sub-add version."]
theorem card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul (A B C : Finset G) :
#(A / C) * #B ≤ #(A / B) * #(B * C) := by
rw [← div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ruzsa_triangle_inequality_mul_div_div _ _ _
-- Auxiliary lemma towards the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality
@[to_additive]
private lemma card_mul_pow_le (hAB : ∀ A' ⊆ A, #(A * B) * #A' ≤ #(A' * B) * #A) (n : ℕ) :
#(A * B ^ n) ≤ (#(A * B) / #A : ℚ≥0) ^ n * #A := by
obtain rfl | hA := A.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (by positivity : (0 : ℚ≥0) < #A)
calc
((#(A * B ^ (n + 1))) * #A : ℚ≥0)
= #(B ^ n * A * B) * #A := by rw [pow_succ, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ #(A * B) * #(B ^ n * A) := mod_cast pluennecke_petridis_inequality_mul _ hAB
_ ≤ #(A * B) * ((#(A * B) / #A) ^ n * #A) := by rw [mul_comm _ A]; gcongr
_ = (#(A * B) / #A) ^ (n + 1) * #A * #A := by field_simp; ring
/-- The **Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality**. Multiplication version. Note that this is genuinely harder
than the division version because we cannot use a double counting argument. -/
@[to_additive "The **Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality**. Addition version. Note that this is genuinely
harder than the subtraction version because we cannot use a double counting argument."]
theorem pluennecke_ruzsa_inequality_pow_div_pow_mul (hA : A.Nonempty) (B : Finset G) (m n : ℕ) :
#(B ^ m / B ^ n) ≤ (#(A * B) / #A : ℚ≥0) ^ (m + n) * #A := by
have hA' : A ∈ A.powerset.erase ∅ := mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hA.ne_empty (mem_powerset_self _)
obtain ⟨C, hC, hCmin⟩ :=
exists_min_image (A.powerset.erase ∅) (fun C ↦ #(C * B) / #C : _ → ℚ≥0) ⟨A, hA'⟩
rw [mem_erase, mem_powerset, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at hC
obtain ⟨hC, hCA⟩ := hC
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (by positivity : (0 : ℚ≥0) < #C)
calc
(#(B ^ m / B ^ n) * #C : ℚ≥0)
≤ #(B ^ m * C) * #(B ^ n * C) := mod_cast ruzsa_triangle_inequality_div_mul_mul ..
_ = #(C * B ^ m) * #(C * B ^ n) := by simp_rw [mul_comm]
_ ≤ ((#(C * B) / #C) ^ m * #C) * ((#(C * B) / #C : ℚ≥0) ^ n * #C) := by
gcongr <;> exact card_mul_pow_le (mul_aux hC hCA hCmin) _
_ = (#(C * B) / #C) ^ (m + n) * #C * #C := by ring
_ ≤ (#(A * B) / #A) ^ (m + n) * #A * #C := by gcongr (?_ ^ _) * #?_ * _; exact hCmin _ hA'
/-- The **Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality**. Division version. -/
| @[to_additive "The **Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality**. Subtraction version."]
theorem pluennecke_ruzsa_inequality_pow_div_pow_div (hA : A.Nonempty) (B : Finset G) (m n : ℕ) :
#(B ^ m / B ^ n) ≤ (#(A / B) / #A : ℚ≥0) ^ (m + n) * #A := by
rw [← card_inv, inv_div', ← inv_pow, ← inv_pow, div_eq_mul_inv A]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/PluenneckeRuzsa.lean | 248 | 251 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is locally closed (e.g. open or closed), then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is
integrable on every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf k hk ↦ hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs with ⟨U, Z, hU, hZ, rfl⟩
rcases exists_compact_subset hU hx.1 with ⟨K, hK, hxK, hKU⟩
rw [nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hU.mem_nhds hx.1)]
refine ⟨Z ∩ K, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hxK), ?_⟩
exact hf (Z ∩ K) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨hKU hy.2, hy.1⟩) (.inter_left hK hZ)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
/-- If `s` is closed, being locally integrable on `s` wrt `μ` is equivalent to being locally
integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`. For the one-way implication without assuming `s` closed,
see `locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hs : IsClosed s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x => ?_, locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict⟩
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, ht_nhds, ht_int⟩ := hf x h
obtain ⟨u, hu_o, hu_x, hu_sub⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht_nhds
refine ⟨u, hu_o.mem_nhds hu_x, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet]
exact ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
· rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at hs
refine ⟨sᶜ, hs.mem_nhds h, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict, inter_comm, inter_compl_self, ← IntegrableOn]
exacts [integrableOn_empty, hs.measurableSet]
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on any compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact {k : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hk : IsCompact k) : IntegrableOn f k μ :=
(hf.locallyIntegrableOn k).integrableOn_isCompact hk
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on an open neighborhood of any
compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {k : Set X}
(hk : IsCompact k) : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ k ⊆ u ∧ IntegrableOn f u μ := by
refine IsCompact.induction_on hk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine ⟨∅, isOpen_empty, Subset.rfl, integrableOn_empty⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨u, u_open, tu, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, hst.trans tu, hu⟩
· rintro s t ⟨u, u_open, su, hu⟩ ⟨v, v_open, tv, hv⟩
exact ⟨u ∪ v, u_open.union v_open, union_subset_union su tv, hu.union hv⟩
· intro x _
rcases hf x with ⟨u, ux, hu⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ux with ⟨v, vu, v_open, xv⟩
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv), v, v_open, Subset.rfl, hu.mono_set vu⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] :
LocallyIntegrable f μ ↔ ∀ k : Set X, IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ :=
⟨fun hf _k hk => hf.integrableOn_isCompact hk, fun hf x =>
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨K, h2K, hf K hK⟩⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
simpa only [restrict_univ] using (locallyIntegrableOn_univ.mpr hf).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If a function is locally integrable in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets covering the space on which it is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ ((⋃ n, u n) = univ) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n) μ) := by
rcases (hf.locallyIntegrableOn univ).exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_union, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, eq_univ_of_univ_subset u_union, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [inter_univ] using hu n
theorem MemLp.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : X → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
have : Fact (μ U < ⊤) := ⟨h'U⟩
refine ⟨U, hU, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
apply (hf.restrict U).mono_exponent hp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.locallyIntegrable := MemLp.locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ :=
(memLp_top_const c).locallyIntegrable le_top
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ => c) s μ :=
(locallyIntegrable_const c).locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem locallyIntegrable_zero : LocallyIntegrable (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) μ :=
(integrable_zero X E μ).locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_zero : LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) s μ :=
locallyIntegrable_zero.locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem LocallyIntegrable.indicator (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : LocallyIntegrable (s.indicator f) μ := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
exact ⟨U, hU, h'U.indicator hs⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_map_homeomorph [BorelSpace X] [BorelSpace Y] (e : X ≃ₜ Y) {f : Y → E}
{μ : Measure X} : LocallyIntegrable f (Measure.map e μ) ↔ LocallyIntegrable (f ∘ e) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x => ?_⟩
· rcases h (e x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e ⁻¹' U, e.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
exact (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).1 h'U
· rcases h (e.symm x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e.symm ⁻¹' U, e.symm.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
apply (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).2
simp only [Homeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv_coe]
convert h'U
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Homeomorph.symm_apply_apply]
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.add (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f + g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).add (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.sub (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f - g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).sub (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (-f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).neg
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
LocallyIntegrable (c • f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).smul c
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Finset.sum_induction f (fun g => LocallyIntegrable g μ) (fun _ _ => LocallyIntegrable.add)
locallyIntegrable_zero hf
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (fun a ↦ ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by
simpa only [← Finset.sum_apply] using locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' s hf
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `g • f` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_left_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → ℝ} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ g x • f x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ g x • f x) = (fun x ↦ g x • f x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_right
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `f • g` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_right_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X] {f : X → ℝ} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
{g : X → E} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ f x • g x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ f x • g x) = (fun x ↦ f x • g x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul_left]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_left
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
open Filter
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact :
Integrable f μ ↔ (IntegrableAtFilter f (cocompact X) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ) := by
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsc, hs⟩, hloc⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, htc, ht⟩ := mem_cocompact'.mp hsc
rewrite [← integrableOn_univ, ← compl_union_self s, integrableOn_union]
exact ⟨(hloc.integrableOn_isCompact htc).mono ht le_rfl, hs⟩
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔
(IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ) ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.integrableAtFilter _⟩, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact (IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff.mpr h.1).filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot_atTop
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [OrderTop X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact h.1.filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [OrderBot X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
variable {a : X}
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
haveI : Nonempty X := Nonempty.intro a
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hs.mono ha' le_rfl, ?_⟩).mono Iic_subset_Iic_union_Icc le_rfl
exact h.integrableOn_compact_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self isCompact_Icc
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
theorem integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMinOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[<] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ := by
| constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨Iio a, Iio_mem_atBot a, h⟩, ⟨Iio a, self_mem_nhdsWithin, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩
· intro ⟨hbot, ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, hlocal⟩
obtain ⟨s', ⟨hs'_mono, hs'⟩⟩ := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨?_, hs.mono hs' le_rfl⟩).mono Iio_subset_Iic_union_Ioo le_rfl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 400 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Composition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.HasLocalization
/-! The category of homological complexes up to quasi-isomorphisms
Given a category `C` with homology and any complex shape `c`, we define
the category `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` which is the localized
category of `HomologicalComplex C c` with respect to quasi-isomorphisms.
When `C` is abelian, this will be the derived category of `C` in the
particular case of the complex shape `ComplexShape.up ℤ`.
Under suitable assumptions on `c` (e.g. chain complexes, or cochain
complexes indexed by `ℤ`), we shall show that `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c`
is also the localized category of `HomotopyCategory C c` with respect to
the class of quasi-isomorphisms.
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits
section
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) [HasZeroMorphisms C]
[CategoryWithHomology C]
lemma HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso (i : ι) :
(quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy (homologyFunctor C c i) := fun _ _ _ hf => by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf
dsimp
infer_instance
variable [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization]
/-- The category of homological complexes up to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
abbrev HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso := (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).Localization'
variable {C c} in
/-- The localization functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c`. -/
abbrev HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c :=
(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).Q'
namespace HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
/-- The homology functor `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c ⥤ C` for each `i : ι`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctor (i : ι) : HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c ⥤ C :=
Localization.lift _ (HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso C c i) Q
/-- The homology functor on `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` is induced by
the homology functor on `HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorFactors (i : ι) :
Q ⋙ homologyFunctor C c i ≅ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor C c i :=
Localization.fac _ (HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso C c i) Q
variable {C c}
lemma isIso_Q_map_iff_mem_quasiIso {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} (f : K ⟶ L) :
IsIso (Q.map f) ↔ HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c f := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff, quasiIso_iff]
intro i
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap]
refine (NatIso.isIso_map_iff (homologyFunctorFactors C c i) f).1 ?_
dsimp
infer_instance
· intro h
exact Localization.inverts Q (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) _ h
end HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
end
section
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) [Preadditive C]
[CategoryWithHomology C]
lemma HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q_inverts_homotopyEquivalences
[(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization] :
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c).IsInvertedBy
HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q :=
MorphismProperty.IsInvertedBy.of_le _ _ _
(Localization.inverts Q (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c))
(homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso C c)
namespace HomotopyCategory
/-- The class of quasi-isomorphisms in the homotopy category. -/
def quasiIso : MorphismProperty (HomotopyCategory C c) :=
fun _ _ f => ∀ (i : ι), IsIso ((homologyFunctor C c i).map f)
variable {C c}
lemma mem_quasiIso_iff {X Y : HomotopyCategory C c} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
quasiIso C c f ↔ ∀ (n : ι), IsIso ((homologyFunctor _ _ n).map f) := by
rfl
lemma quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} (f : K ⟶ L) :
quasiIso C c ((quotient C c).map f) ↔ HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c f := by
have eq := fun (i : ι) => NatIso.isIso_map_iff (homologyFunctorFactors C c i) f
dsimp at eq
simp only [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff, mem_quasiIso_iff, quasiIso_iff,
quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap, eq]
variable (C c)
instance respectsIso_quasiIso : (quasiIso C c).RespectsIso := by
apply MorphismProperty.RespectsIso.of_respects_arrow_iso
intro f g e hf i
exact ((MorphismProperty.isomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
((homologyFunctor C c i).mapArrow.mapIso e)).1 (hf i)
lemma homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso (i : ι) :
(quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy (homologyFunctor C c i) := fun _ _ _ hf => hf i
lemma quasiIso_eq_quasiIso_map_quotient :
quasiIso C c = (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).map (quotient C c) := by
ext ⟨K⟩ ⟨L⟩ f
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).map_surjective f
constructor
· intro hf
rw [quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf
exact MorphismProperty.map_mem_map _ _ _ hf
· rintro ⟨K', L', g, h, ⟨e⟩⟩
rw [← quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff] at h
exact ((quasiIso C c).arrow_mk_iso_iff e).1 h
end HomotopyCategory
/-- The condition on a complex shape `c` saying that homotopic maps become equal in
the localized category with respect to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
class ComplexShape.QFactorsThroughHomotopy {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
(C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C]
[CategoryWithHomology C] : Prop where
areEqualizedByLocalization {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} {f g : K ⟶ L} (h : Homotopy f g) :
AreEqualizedByLocalization (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) f g
namespace HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
variable {C c}
variable [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization] [c.QFactorsThroughHomotopy C]
lemma Q_map_eq_of_homotopy {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} {f g : K ⟶ L} (h : Homotopy f g) :
Q.map f = Q.map g :=
(ComplexShape.QFactorsThroughHomotopy.areEqualizedByLocalization h).map_eq Q
/-- The functor `HomotopyCategory C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` from the homotopy
category to the localized category with respect to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
def Qh : HomotopyCategory C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c :=
CategoryTheory.Quotient.lift _ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q (by
intro K L f g ⟨h⟩
exact Q_map_eq_of_homotopy h)
variable (C c)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `HomotopyCategory.quotient C c ⋙ Qh ≅ Q`. -/
def quotientCompQhIso : HomotopyCategory.quotient C c ⋙ Qh ≅ Q := by
apply Quotient.lift.isLift
lemma Qh_inverts_quasiIso : (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy Qh := by
rintro ⟨K⟩ ⟨L⟩ φ
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).map_surjective φ
rw [HomotopyCategory.quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff φ,
← HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.isIso_Q_map_iff_mem_quasiIso]
exact (NatIso.isIso_map_iff (quotientCompQhIso C c) φ).2
instance : (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c ⋙ Qh).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) :=
Functor.IsLocalization.of_iso _ (quotientCompQhIso C c).symm
/-- The homology functor on `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` is induced by
the homology functor on `HomotopyCategory C c`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorFactorsh (i : ι) :
Qh ⋙ homologyFunctor C c i ≅ HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor C c i :=
Quotient.natIsoLift _ ((Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (quotientCompQhIso C c) _ ≪≫
homologyFunctorFactors C c i ≪≫ (HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors C c i).symm)
section
variable [(HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c)]
/-- The category `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` which was defined as a localization of
`HomologicalComplex C c` with respect to quasi-isomorphisms also identify to a localization
of the homotopy category with respect ot quasi-isomorphisms. -/
instance : HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Qh.IsLocalization (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C c) :=
Functor.IsLocalization.of_comp (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c)
Qh (HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c)
(HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C c) (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c)
(homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso C c)
(HomotopyCategory.quasiIso_eq_quasiIso_map_quotient C c)
end
end HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
end
section Cylinder
variable {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j)
(C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
include hc
/-- The homotopy category satisfies the universal property of the localized category
with respect to homotopy equivalences. -/
def ComplexShape.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetQuotient (E : Type*) [Category E] :
Localization.StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c)
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c) E where
inverts := HomotopyCategory.quotient_inverts_homotopyEquivalences C c
lift F hF := CategoryTheory.Quotient.lift _ F (by
intro K L f g ⟨h⟩
have : DecidableRel c.Rel := by classical infer_instance
exact h.map_eq_of_inverts_homotopyEquivalences hc F hF)
fac _ _ := rfl
uniq _ _ h := Quotient.lift_unique' _ _ _ h
lemma ComplexShape.quotient_isLocalization :
(HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences _ _) := by
apply Functor.IsLocalization.mk'
all_goals apply c.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetQuotient hc
lemma ComplexShape.QFactorsThroughHomotopy_of_exists_prev [CategoryWithHomology C] :
c.QFactorsThroughHomotopy C where
areEqualizedByLocalization {K L f g} h := by
have : DecidableRel c.Rel := by classical infer_instance
exact h.map_eq_of_inverts_homotopyEquivalences hc _
(MorphismProperty.IsInvertedBy.of_le _ _ _
(Localization.inverts _ (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C _))
(homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso C _))
end Cylinder
section ChainComplex
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} [Preadditive C]
[AddRightCancelSemigroup ι] [One ι] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
instance : (HomotopyCategory.quotient C (ComplexShape.down ι)).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences _ _) :=
(ComplexShape.down ι).quotient_isLocalization (fun _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩) C
variable [CategoryWithHomology C]
instance : (ComplexShape.down ι).QFactorsThroughHomotopy C :=
(ComplexShape.down ι).QFactorsThroughHomotopy_of_exists_prev (fun _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩) C
example [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C (ComplexShape.down ι)).HasLocalization] :
HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Qh.IsLocalization
(HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C (ComplexShape.down ι)) :=
inferInstance
/- By duality, the results obtained here for chain complexes could be dualized in
order to obtain similar results for general cochain complexes. However, the case of
interest for the construction of the derived category (cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`)
can also be obtained directly, which is done below. -/
end ChainComplex
section CochainComplex
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} [Preadditive C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
instance : (HomotopyCategory.quotient C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences _ _) :=
(ComplexShape.up ℤ).quotient_isLocalization (fun n => ⟨n - 1, by simp⟩) C
variable [CategoryWithHomology C]
instance : (ComplexShape.up ℤ).QFactorsThroughHomotopy C :=
(ComplexShape.up ℤ).QFactorsThroughHomotopy_of_exists_prev (fun n => ⟨n - 1, by simp⟩) C
/-- When we define the derived category as `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)`,
i.e. as the localization of cochain complexes with respect to quasi-isomorphisms, this
example shall say that the derived category is also the localization of the homotopy
category with respect to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
example [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).HasLocalization] :
HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Qh.IsLocalization
(HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)) :=
inferInstance
end CochainComplex
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
{ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
section
variable [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D]
[CategoryWithHomology C] [CategoryWithHomology D]
[(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso D c).HasLocalization]
[F.Additive] [F.PreservesHomology]
| /-- The localizer morphism which expresses that `F.mapHomologicalComplex c` preserves
quasi-isomorphisms. -/
@[simps]
def mapHomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIsoLocalizerMorphism :
LocalizerMorphism (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso D c) where
functor := F.mapHomologicalComplex c
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Localization.lean | 308 | 313 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.