Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) :=
monotone_image.strictMono_of_injective inj.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
alias ⟨Injective.existsUnique_of_mem_range, _⟩ := Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx]
theorem LeftInverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s := by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
theorem LeftInverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
protected theorem Involutive.preimage {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) : Involutive (preimage f) :=
hf.rightInverse.preimage_preimage
end Function
namespace EquivLike
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} {E : Type*} [EquivLike E ι ι']
@[simp] lemma range_comp {α : Type*} (f : ι' → α) (e : E) : range (f ∘ e) = range f :=
(EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _
end EquivLike
/-! ### Image and preimage on subtypes -/
namespace Subtype
variable {α : Type*}
theorem coe_image {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} :
(↑) '' s = { x | ∃ h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun a =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩ => h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩, fun ⟨ha, in_s⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : (↑) '' { x : ↥s | ↑x ∈ t } = t := by
ext x
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', hx⟩ => hx ▸ hx', fun hx => ⟨⟨x, h hx⟩, hx, rfl⟩⟩
theorem range_coe {s : Set α} : range ((↑) : s → α) = s := by
rw [← image_univ]
simp [-image_univ, coe_image]
/-- A variant of `range_coe`. Try to use `range_coe` if possible.
This version is useful when defining a new type that is defined as the subtype of something.
In that case, the coercion doesn't fire anymore. -/
theorem range_val {s : Set α} : range (Subtype.val : s → α) = s :=
range_coe
/-- We make this the simp lemma instead of `range_coe`. The reason is that if we write
for `s : Set α` the function `(↑) : s → α`, then the inferred implicit arguments of `(↑)` are
`↑α (fun x ↦ x ∈ s)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range ((↑) : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_self (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' s = univ := by
rw [← preimage_range, range_coe]
theorem range_val_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
theorem coe_image_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set s) : ((↑) : s → α) '' t ⊆ s :=
fun x ⟨y, _, yvaleq⟩ => by
rw [← yvaleq]; exact y.property
theorem coe_image_univ (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' Set.univ = s :=
image_univ.trans range_coe
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_coe (s t : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_eq_range_inter.trans <| congr_arg (· ∩ t) range_coe
theorem image_preimage_val (s t : Set α) : (Subtype.val : s → α) '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_coe s t
theorem preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff {s t u : Set α} :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe, coe_injective.image_injective.eq_iff]
theorem preimage_coe_self_inter (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, ← inter_assoc, inter_self]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_inter_self (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (t ∩ s) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_coe_self_inter]
theorem preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val : s → α) ⁻¹' t = Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff
lemma preimage_val_subset_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val ⁻¹' t : Set s) ⊆ Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u := by
constructor
· rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe]
exact image_subset _
· intro h x a
exact (h ⟨x.2, a⟩).2
theorem exists_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∃ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∃ s : Set α, s ⊆ t ∧ p s := by
rw [← exists_subset_range_and_iff, range_coe]
theorem forall_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∀ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s ⊆ t → p s := by
rw [← forall_subset_range_iff, range_coe]
theorem preimage_coe_nonempty {s t : Set α} :
(((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, image_nonempty]
theorem preimage_coe_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ∅ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, preimage_coe_nonempty]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_compl (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' sᶜ = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (inter_compl_self s)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_compl' (s : Set α) :
(fun x : (sᶜ : Set α) => (x : α)) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (compl_inter_self s)
end Subtype
/-! ### Images and preimages on `Option` -/
open Set
namespace Option
theorem injective_iff {α β} {f : Option α → β} :
Injective f ↔ Injective (f ∘ some) ∧ f none ∉ range (f ∘ some) := by
simp only [mem_range, not_exists, (· ∘ ·)]
refine
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.comp (Option.some_injective _), fun x => hf.ne <| Option.some_ne_none _⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h_some, h_none⟩ (_ | a) (_ | b) hab
exacts [rfl, (h_none _ hab.symm).elim, (h_none _ hab).elim, congr_arg some (h_some hab)]
theorem range_eq {α β} (f : Option α → β) : range f = insert (f none) (range (f ∘ some)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => Option.exists.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
end Option
namespace Set
open Function
/-! ### Injectivity and surjectivity lemmas for image and preimage -/
section ImagePreimage
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
theorem image_surjective : Surjective (image f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h y => ?_, Surjective.image_surjective⟩
rcases h {y} with ⟨s, hs⟩
have := mem_singleton y; rw [← hs] at this; rcases this with ⟨x, _, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_injective : Injective (image f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x x' hx => ?_, Injective.image_injective⟩
rw [← singleton_eq_singleton_iff]; apply h
rw [image_singleton, image_singleton, hx]
theorem preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
f ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = f '' t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
theorem eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ f '' s = t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
end ImagePreimage
end Set
/-! ### Disjoint lemmas for image and preimage -/
section Disjoint
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem Disjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _ hx => h.le_bot hx
lemma Codisjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Codisjoint s t) :
Codisjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := by
simp only [codisjoint_iff_le_sup, Set.sup_eq_union, top_le_iff, ← Set.preimage_union] at h ⊢
rw [h]; rfl
lemma IsCompl.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : IsCompl s t) :
IsCompl (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
⟨h.1.preimage f, h.2.preimage f⟩
namespace Set
theorem disjoint_image_image {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, f b ≠ g c) : Disjoint (f '' s) (g '' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by rintro a ⟨⟨b, hb, eq⟩, c, hc, rfl⟩; exact h b hb c hc eq
theorem disjoint_image_of_injective (hf : Injective f) {s t : Set α} (hd : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
disjoint_image_image fun _ hx _ hy => hf.ne fun H => Set.disjoint_iff.1 hd ⟨hx, H.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem _root_.Disjoint.of_image (h : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t)) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _ hx =>
disjoint_left.1 h (mem_image_of_mem _ hx.1) (mem_image_of_mem _ hx.2)
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_image_iff (hf : Injective f) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨Disjoint.of_image, disjoint_image_of_injective hf⟩
theorem _root_.Disjoint.of_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s t : Set β}
(h : Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← image_preimage_eq (_ ∩ _) hf, preimage_inter, h.inter_eq,
image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_preimage_iff (hf : Surjective f) {s t : Set β} :
Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨Disjoint.of_preimage hf, Disjoint.preimage _⟩
theorem preimage_eq_empty {s : Set β} (h : Disjoint s (range f)) :
f ⁻¹' s = ∅ := by
simpa using h.preimage f
theorem preimage_eq_empty_iff {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' s = ∅ ↔ Disjoint s (range f) :=
⟨fun h => by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, not_exists, mem_inter_iff,
not_and, mem_range, mem_preimage] at h ⊢
intro y hy x hx
rw [← hx] at hy
exact h x hy,
preimage_eq_empty⟩
end Set
end Disjoint
section Sigma
variable {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {i j : α} {s : Set (β i)}
lemma sigma_mk_preimage_image' (h : i ≠ j) : Sigma.mk j ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk i '' s) = ∅ := by
simp [image, h]
lemma sigma_mk_preimage_image_eq_self : Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk i '' s) = s := by
simp [image]
end Sigma
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,525 | 1,530 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
| cos_periodic.int_mul n x
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 346 | 346 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Order-closed topologies
In this file we introduce 3 typeclass mixins that relate topology and order structures:
- `ClosedIicTopology` says that all the intervals $(-∞, a]$ (formally, `Set.Iic a`)
are closed sets;
- `ClosedIciTopology` says that all the intervals $[a, +∞)$ (formally, `Set.Ici a`)
are closed sets;
- `OrderClosedTopology` says that the set of points `(x, y)` such that `x ≤ y`
is closed in the product topology.
The last predicate implies the first two.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts.
For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `ClosedIciTopology` vs `ClosedIicTopology,
`Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `isOpen_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `isOpen_Iio`, `isOpen_Ioi`, `isOpen_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `isClosed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `isClosed_Iic`, `isClosed_Ici`, `isClosed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a`); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `sSup` and `sInf`
* `Continuous.min`, `Continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `Tendsto.min`, `Tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
-/
open Set Filter
open OrderDual (toDual)
open scoped Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIicTopology α` means that `Iic a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIicTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `(-∞, a]` is closed. -/
isClosed_Iic (a : α) : IsClosed (Iic a)
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIciTopology α` means that `Ici a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIciTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `[a, +∞)` is closed. -/
isClosed_Ici (a : α) : IsClosed (Ici a)
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class OrderClosedTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The set `{ (x, y) | x ≤ y }` is a closed set. -/
isClosed_le' : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 }
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : FirstCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
theorem Dense.orderDual [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) :
Dense (OrderDual.ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
hs
section General
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] {s : Set α}
protected lemma BddAbove.of_closure : BddAbove (closure s) → BddAbove s :=
BddAbove.mono subset_closure
protected lemma BddBelow.of_closure : BddBelow (closure s) → BddBelow s :=
BddBelow.mono subset_closure
end General
section ClosedIicTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Iic : IsClosed (Iic a) :=
ClosedIicTopology.isClosed_Iic a
instance : ClosedIciTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_Iic (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
isClosed_Iic.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem le_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem le_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_closure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (closure s : Set α) = upperBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic, isClosed_Iic.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_closure : BddAbove (closure s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp_rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddAbove.closure⟩ := bddAbove_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot ↔ ¬IsBot a := by
constructor
· intro hd hbot
rw [hbot.atBot_eq, disjoint_principal_right] at hd
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hd le_rfl
· simp only [IsBot, not_forall]
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot b)
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hb
theorem IsLUB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsLUB (range f) a :=
⟨forall_mem_range.mpr hle, fun _c hc ↦ le_of_tendsto' hlim fun i ↦ hc <| mem_range_self i⟩
end Preorder
section NoBotOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot := by simp
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atBot (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atBot = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atBot_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atBot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a)
end NoBotOrder
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot F]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (hlim : Filter.Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨆ i, f i = a :=
have := F.nonempty_of_neBot
(IsLUB.range_of_tendsto hle hlim).ciSup_eq
theorem iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, f i < a) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Iic (f i) = Iio a := by
have obs : a ∉ range f := by
rw [mem_range]
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact (hlt i).false
rw [← biUnion_range, (IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (le_of_lt <| hlt ·) hlim).biUnion_Iic_eq_Iio obs]
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Ioi : IsOpen (Ioi a) := by
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
isOpen_Ioi.interior_eq
theorem Ioi_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b := IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioi h
theorem eventually_gt_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b < x := Ioi_mem_nhds hab
theorem Ici_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ici a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_nhds h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem eventually_ge_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b ≤ x := Ici_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u < f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_gt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_gt_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u ≤ f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_ge_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le
protected theorem Dense.exists_gt [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x < y :=
hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi (exists_gt x)
protected theorem Dense.exists_ge [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(hs.exists_gt x).imp fun _ h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩
theorem Dense.exists_ge' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (htop : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := by
by_cases hx : IsTop x
· exact ⟨x, htop x hx, le_rfl⟩
· simp only [IsTop, not_forall, not_le] at hx
rcases hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi hx with ⟨y, hys, hy : x < y⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, hy.le⟩
/-!
### Left neighborhoods on a `ClosedIicTopology`
Limits to the left of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to the left,
either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[<] a` and `𝓝[≤] a`.
Here we prove that all left-neighborhoods of a point are equal,
and we prove other useful characterizations which require the stronger hypothesis `OrderTopology α`
in another file.
-/
/-!
#### Point excluded
-/
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := by
simpa only [← Iio_inter_Ioi] using inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (Ioi_mem_nhds H)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT H.1) <| Ioo_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLT (h : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[<] b = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| h.Ioo_eq ▸ Ioo_mem_nhdsLT h.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iio := CovBy.nhdsLT
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLT [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ := by
if h : IsMin a then simp [h.Iio_eq]
else exact (Order.pred_covBy_of_not_isMin h).nhdsLT
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iio := PredOrder.nhdsLT
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGT_eq_nhdsNE [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[>] a = 𝓝[≠] a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGT, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[≥] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGE, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ico_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Icc_mem_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ico a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioo a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ico_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ico a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioo_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioo a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT h]
/-!
#### Point included
-/
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLE (H : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, H.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iic := CovBy.nhdsLE
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLE [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, PredOrder.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iic := PredOrder.nhdsLE
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
inter_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds H) self_mem_nhdsWithin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ico_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioc_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem H) Ioc_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Icc_mem_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Icc a b] b = 𝓝[≤] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsWithin_Iic := nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioc a b] b = 𝓝[≤] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Iic := nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Icc_iff_Iic (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Icc a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioc_iff_Iic (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioc a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE h]
end LinearOrder
end ClosedIicTopology
section ClosedIciTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIciTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Ici {a : α} : IsClosed (Ici a) :=
ClosedIciTopology.isClosed_Ici a
instance : ClosedIicTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Iic _ := isClosed_Ici (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ici (a : α) : closure (Ici a) = Ici a :=
isClosed_Ici.closure_eq
lemma ge_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
isClosed_Ici.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem ge_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
isClosed_Ici.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem ge_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma lowerBounds_closure (s : Set α) : lowerBounds (closure s : Set α) = lowerBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici, isClosed_Ici.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_closure : BddBelow (closure s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp_rw [BddBelow, lowerBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddBelow.closure⟩ := bddBelow_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atTop_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atTop ↔ ¬IsTop a :=
disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem IsGLB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, a ≤ f i)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsGLB (range f) a :=
IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) hle hlim
end Preorder
section NoTopOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoTopOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIciTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atTop (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atTop := disjoint_nhds_atBot (toDual a)
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atTop (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atTop = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atTop a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atTop a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atTop :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atTop a)
end NoTopOrder
theorem iInf_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIciTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨅ i, f i = a :=
iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) hle hlim
theorem iUnion_Ici_eq_Ioi_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIciTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, a < f i) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Ici (f i) = Ioi a :=
iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) hlt hlim
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIciTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Iio : IsOpen (Iio a) := isOpen_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem interior_Iio : interior (Iio a) = Iio a := isOpen_Iio.interior_eq
theorem Iio_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Iio b ∈ 𝓝 a := isOpen_Iio.mem_nhds h
theorem eventually_lt_nhds (hab : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b := Iio_mem_nhds hab
theorem Iic_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Iic b ∈ 𝓝 a :=
mem_of_superset (Iio_mem_nhds h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem eventually_le_nhds (hab : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b := Iic_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_lt_const {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : v < u)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, f a < u :=
h.eventually <| eventually_lt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_lt_of_tendsto_lt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_lt_const
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_le_const {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : v < u)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, f a ≤ u :=
h.eventually <| eventually_le_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_le_const
protected theorem Dense.exists_lt [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
hs.orderDual.exists_gt x
protected theorem Dense.exists_le [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
hs.orderDual.exists_ge x
theorem Dense.exists_le' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
hs.orderDual.exists_ge' hbot x
/-!
### Right neighborhoods on a `ClosedIciTopology`
Limits to the right of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to the right,
either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[>] a` and `𝓝[≥] a`.
Here we prove that all right-neighborhoods of a point are equal,
and we prove other useful characterizations which require the stronger hypothesis `OrderTopology α`
in another file.
-/
/-!
#### Point excluded
-/
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨Iio c, isOpen_Iio, H.2, by rw [inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]; exact Ioo_subset_Ioo_left H.1⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Ioo_mem_nhdsGT
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsGT (h : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ := h.toDual.nhdsLT
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Ioi := CovBy.nhdsGT
protected theorem SuccOrder.nhdsGT [SuccOrder α] : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ := PredOrder.nhdsLT (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias SuccOrder.nhdsWithin_Ioi := SuccOrder.nhdsGT
theorem SuccOrder.nhdsLT_eq_nhdsNE [SuccOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[<] a = 𝓝[≠] a :=
PredOrder.nhdsGT_eq_nhdsNE (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem SuccOrder.nhdsLE_eq_nhds [SuccOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[≤] a = 𝓝 a :=
PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Ioc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Ioc_mem_nhdsGT
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Ico_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ico_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Ico_mem_nhdsGT
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Icc_mem_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioc a b] a = 𝓝[>] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iic_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi := nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioo a b] a = 𝓝[>] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iio_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi := nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioc_iff_Ioi (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioc a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioo_iff_Ioi (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioo a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT h]
/-!
### Point included
-/
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsGE (H : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[≥] a = pure a := H.toDual.nhdsLE
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Ici := CovBy.nhdsGE
protected theorem SuccOrder.nhdsGE [SuccOrder α] : 𝓝[≥] a = pure a :=
PredOrder.nhdsLE (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias SuccOrder.nhdsWithin_Ici := SuccOrder.nhdsGE
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGE (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[≥] a :=
inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ <| Iio_mem_nhds H
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici' := Ico_mem_nhdsGE
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhdsGE H.2) <| Ico_subset_Ico_left H.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Ico_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhdsGE H.2) <| Ico_subset_Ioo_left H.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Ioo_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Ioc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem H) Ico_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGE (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[≥] a := Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici' := Icc_mem_nhdsGE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Icc a b] a = 𝓝[≥] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iic_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ici := nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ico a b] a = 𝓝[≥] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iio_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsWithin_Ici := nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Icc_iff_Ici (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Icc a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ico_iff_Ici (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ico a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE h]
end LinearOrder
end ClosedIciTopology
section OrderClosedTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [t : OrderClosedTopology α]
namespace Subtype
-- todo: add `OrderEmbedding.orderClosedTopology`
instance {p : α → Prop} : OrderClosedTopology (Subtype p) :=
have this : Continuous fun p : Subtype p × Subtype p => ((p.fst : α), (p.snd : α)) :=
continuous_subtype_val.prodMap continuous_subtype_val
OrderClosedTopology.mk (t.isClosed_le'.preimage this)
end Subtype
theorem isClosed_le_prod : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
t.isClosed_le'
theorem isClosed_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
IsClosed { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
continuous_iff_isClosed.mp (hf.prodMk hg) _ isClosed_le_prod
instance : ClosedIicTopology α where
isClosed_Iic _ := isClosed_le continuous_id continuous_const
instance : ClosedIciTopology α where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_le continuous_const continuous_id
instance : OrderClosedTopology αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le' (α := α)).preimage continuous_swap⟩
theorem isClosed_Icc {a b : α} : IsClosed (Icc a b) :=
IsClosed.inter isClosed_Ici isClosed_Iic
@[simp]
theorem closure_Icc (a b : α) : closure (Icc a b) = Icc a b :=
isClosed_Icc.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto {f g : β → α} {b : Filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} [NeBot b]
(hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : f ≤ᶠ[b] g) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
have : Tendsto (fun b => (f b, g b)) b (𝓝 (a₁, a₂)) := hf.prodMk_nhds hg
show (a₁, a₂) ∈ { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } from t.isClosed_le'.mem_of_tendsto this h
alias tendsto_le_of_eventuallyLE := le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' {f g : β → α} {b : Filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} [NeBot b]
(hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto hf hg (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp]
theorem closure_le_eq [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
closure { b | f b ≤ g b } = { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
(isClosed_le hf hg).closure_eq
theorem closure_lt_subset_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : closure { b | f b < g b } ⊆ { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
(closure_minimal fun _ => le_of_lt) <| isClosed_le hf hg
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.closure_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β} {x : β}
(hx : x ∈ closure s) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x)
(h : ∀ y ∈ s, f y ≤ g y) : f x ≤ g x :=
show (f x, g x) ∈ { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } from
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.closure_subset ((hf.prodMk hg).mem_closure hx h)
/-- If `s` is a closed set and two functions `f` and `g` are continuous on `s`,
then the set `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x}` is a closed set. -/
theorem IsClosed.isClosed_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) : IsClosed ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x }) :=
(hf.prodMk hg).preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed hs OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'
theorem le_on_closure [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x)
(hf : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) (hg : ContinuousOn g (closure s)) ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ closure s) :
f x ≤ g x :=
have : s ⊆ { y ∈ closure s | f y ≤ g y } := fun y hy => ⟨subset_closure hy, h y hy⟩
(closure_minimal this (isClosed_closure.isClosed_le hf hg) hx).2
theorem IsClosed.epigraph [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsClosed { p : β × α | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).isClosed_le (hf.comp continuousOn_fst Subset.rfl) continuousOn_snd
theorem IsClosed.hypograph [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsClosed { p : β × α | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).isClosed_le continuousOn_snd (hf.comp continuousOn_fst Subset.rfl)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [PartialOrder α] [t : OrderClosedTopology α]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 90) OrderClosedTopology.to_t2Space : T2Space α :=
t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal.2 <| by
simpa only [diagonal, le_antisymm_iff] using
t.isClosed_le'.inter (isClosed_le continuous_snd continuous_fst)
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α]
theorem isOpen_lt [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
IsOpen { b | f b < g b } := by
simpa only [lt_iff_not_le] using (isClosed_le hg hf).isOpen_compl
theorem isOpen_lt_prod : IsOpen { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd
variable {a b : α}
theorem isOpen_Ioo : IsOpen (Ioo a b) :=
IsOpen.inter isOpen_Ioi isOpen_Iio
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioo : interior (Ioo a b) = Ioo a b :=
isOpen_Ioo.interior_eq
theorem Ioo_subset_closure_interior : Ioo a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ioo a b)) := by
simp only [interior_Ioo, subset_closure]
theorem Ioo_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem Ioc_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds ha hb) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds ha hb) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Icc_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds ha hb) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
/-- The only order closed topology on a linear order which is a `PredOrder` and a `SuccOrder`
is the discrete topology.
This theorem is not an instance,
because it causes searches for `PredOrder` and `SuccOrder` with their `Preorder` arguments
and very rarely matches. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_predOrder_succOrder [PredOrder α] [SuccOrder α] :
DiscreteTopology α := by
refine discreteTopology_iff_nhds.mpr fun a ↦ ?_
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ, ← Iic_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union, PredOrder.nhdsLE, SuccOrder.nhdsGT,
sup_bot_eq]
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {f g : β → α}
section
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem lt_subset_interior_le (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
{ b | f b < g b } ⊆ interior { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
(interior_maximal fun _ => le_of_lt) <| isOpen_lt hf hg
theorem frontier_le_subset_eq (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
frontier { b | f b ≤ g b } ⊆ { b | f b = g b } := by
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, closure_le_eq hf hg]
rintro b ⟨hb₁, hb₂⟩
refine le_antisymm hb₁ (closure_lt_subset_le hg hf ?_)
convert hb₂ using 2; simp only [not_le.symm]; rfl
theorem frontier_Iic_subset (a : α) : frontier (Iic a) ⊆ {a} :=
frontier_le_subset_eq (@continuous_id α _) continuous_const
theorem frontier_Ici_subset (a : α) : frontier (Ici a) ⊆ {a} :=
frontier_Iic_subset (α := αᵒᵈ) _
theorem frontier_lt_subset_eq (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
frontier { b | f b < g b } ⊆ { b | f b = g b } := by
simpa only [← not_lt, ← compl_setOf, frontier_compl, eq_comm] using frontier_le_subset_eq hg hf
theorem continuous_if_le [TopologicalSpace γ] [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≤ g x)] {f' g' : β → γ}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (hf' : ContinuousOn f' { x | f x ≤ g x })
(hg' : ContinuousOn g' { x | g x ≤ f x }) (hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x → f' x = g' x) :
Continuous fun x => if f x ≤ g x then f' x else g' x := by
refine continuous_if (fun a ha => hfg _ (frontier_le_subset_eq hf hg ha)) ?_ (hg'.mono ?_)
· rwa [(isClosed_le hf hg).closure_eq]
· simp only [not_le]
exact closure_lt_subset_le hg hf
theorem Continuous.if_le [TopologicalSpace γ] [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≤ g x)] {f' g' : β → γ}
(hf' : Continuous f') (hg' : Continuous g') (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g)
(hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x → f' x = g' x) : Continuous fun x => if f x ≤ g x then f' x else g' x :=
continuous_if_le hf hg hf'.continuousOn hg'.continuousOn hfg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_lt {l : Filter γ} {f g : γ → α} {y z : α} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 y))
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 z)) (hyz : y < z) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x :=
let ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, h⟩ := hyz.exists_disjoint_Iio_Ioi
(hg.eventually (Ioi_mem_nhds hb)).mp <| (hf.eventually (Iio_mem_nhds ha)).mono fun _ h₁ h₂ =>
| h _ h₁ _ h₂
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.eventually_lt {x₀ : β} (hf : ContinuousAt f x₀) (hg : ContinuousAt g x₀)
(hfg : f x₀ < g x₀) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, f x < g x :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/OrderClosed.lean | 892 | 895 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Completion
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
/-!
# Real numbers from Cauchy sequences
This file defines `ℝ` as the type of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
This choice is motivated by how easy it is to prove that `ℝ` is a commutative ring, by simply
lifting everything to `ℚ`.
The facts that the real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring,
and a conditionally complete linear order,
have been deferred to the file `Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean`,
in order to keep the imports here simple.
The fact that the real numbers are a (trivial) *-ring has similarly been deferred to
`Mathlib/Data/Real/Star.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing
/-- The type `ℝ` of real numbers constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers. -/
structure Real where ofCauchy ::
/-- The underlying Cauchy completion -/
cauchy : CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "ℝ" => Real
namespace CauSeq.Completion
-- this can't go in `Data.Real.CauSeqCompletion` as the structure on `ℚ` isn't available
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_rat {abv : ℚ → ℚ} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (q : ℚ) :
ofRat (q : ℚ) = (q : Cauchy abv) :=
rfl
end CauSeq.Completion
namespace Real
open CauSeq CauSeq.Completion
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem ext_cauchy_iff : ∀ {x y : Real}, x = y ↔ x.cauchy = y.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by rw [ofCauchy.injEq]
theorem ext_cauchy {x y : Real} : x.cauchy = y.cauchy → x = y :=
ext_cauchy_iff.2
/-- The real numbers are isomorphic to the quotient of Cauchy sequences on the rationals. -/
def equivCauchy : ℝ ≃ CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
⟨Real.cauchy, Real.ofCauchy, fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
-- irreducible doesn't work for instances: https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/511
private irreducible_def zero : ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
private irreducible_def one : ℝ :=
⟨1⟩
private irreducible_def add : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
private noncomputable irreducible_def inv' : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨a⁻¹⟩
instance : Zero ℝ :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One ℝ :=
⟨one⟩
instance : Add ℝ :=
⟨add⟩
instance : Neg ℝ :=
⟨neg⟩
instance : Mul ℝ :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : Sub ℝ :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ :=
⟨inv'⟩
theorem ofCauchy_zero : (⟨0⟩ : ℝ) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_one : (⟨1⟩ : ℝ) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_add (a b) : (⟨a + b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
(add_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_neg (a) : (⟨-a⟩ : ℝ) = -⟨a⟩ :=
(neg_def _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_sub (a b) : (⟨a - b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofCauchy_add, ofCauchy_neg]
rfl
theorem ofCauchy_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_inv {f} : (⟨f⁻¹⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨f⟩⁻¹ :=
show _ = inv' _ by rw [inv']
theorem cauchy_zero : (0 : ℝ).cauchy = 0 :=
show zero.cauchy = 0 by rw [zero_def]
theorem cauchy_one : (1 : ℝ).cauchy = 1 :=
show one.cauchy = 1 by rw [one_def]
theorem cauchy_add : ∀ a b, (a + b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy + b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (add _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [add_def]
theorem cauchy_neg : ∀ a, (-a : ℝ).cauchy = -a.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩ => show (neg _).cauchy = _ by rw [neg_def]
theorem cauchy_mul : ∀ a b, (a * b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy * b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (mul _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [mul_def]
theorem cauchy_sub : ∀ a b, (a - b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy - b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← cauchy_neg, ← cauchy_add]
rfl
theorem cauchy_inv : ∀ f, (f⁻¹ : ℝ).cauchy = f.cauchy⁻¹
| ⟨f⟩ => show (inv' _).cauchy = _ by rw [inv']
instance instNatCast : NatCast ℝ where natCast n := ⟨n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast ℝ where intCast z := ⟨z⟩
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℝ where nnratCast q := ⟨q⟩
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℝ where ratCast q := ⟨q⟩
lemma ofCauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : ℝ) = n := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : ℝ) = z := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ).cauchy = n := rfl
lemma cauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : ℝ).cauchy = z := rfl
lemma cauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
instance commRing : CommRing ℝ where
natCast n := ⟨n⟩
intCast z := ⟨z⟩
zero := (0 : ℝ)
one := (1 : ℝ)
mul := (· * ·)
add := (· + ·)
| neg := @Neg.neg ℝ _
sub := @Sub.sub ℝ _
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Basic.lean | 171 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Killing
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.RootSystem.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.RootSystem.Reduced
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.RootSystem.Finite.CanonicalBilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
/-!
# The root system associated with a Lie algebra
We show that the roots of a finite dimensional splitting semisimple Lie algebra over a field of
characteristic 0 form a root system. We achieve this by studying root chains.
## Main results
- `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.apply_coroot_eq_cast`:
If `β - qα ... β ... β + rα` is the `α`-chain through `β`, then
`β (coroot α) = q - r`. In particular, it is an integer.
- `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.rootSpace_zsmul_add_ne_bot_iff`:
The `α`-chain through `β` (`β - qα ... β ... β + rα`) are the only roots of the form `β + kα`.
- `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.eq_neg_or_eq_of_eq_smul`:
`±α` are the only `K`-multiples of a root `α` that are also (non-zero) roots.
- `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.rootSystem`: The root system of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra with
non-degenerate Killing form over a field of characteristic zero,
relative to a splitting Cartan subalgebra.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace LieAlgebra.IsKilling
open LieModule Module
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [CharZero K] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra K L]
[IsKilling K L] [FiniteDimensional K L]
{H : LieSubalgebra K L} [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] [IsTriangularizable K H L]
variable (α β : Weight K H L)
private lemma chainLength_aux (hα : α.IsNonZero) {x} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H (chainTop α β)) :
∃ n : ℕ, n • x = ⁅coroot α, x⁆ := by
by_cases hx' : x = 0
· exact ⟨0, by simp [hx']⟩
obtain ⟨h, e, f, isSl2, he, hf⟩ := exists_isSl2Triple_of_weight_isNonZero hα
obtain rfl := isSl2.h_eq_coroot hα he hf
have : isSl2.HasPrimitiveVectorWith x (chainTop α β (coroot α)) :=
have := lie_mem_genWeightSpace_of_mem_genWeightSpace he hx
⟨hx', by rw [← lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace hx]; rfl,
by rwa [genWeightSpace_add_chainTop α β hα] at this⟩
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ := this.exists_nat
exact ⟨μ, by rw [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul K, ← hμ, lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace hx]⟩
/-- The length of the `α`-chain through `β`. See `chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff`. -/
def chainLength (α β : Weight K H L) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.propDecidable
if hα : α.IsZero then 0 else
(chainLength_aux α β hα (chainTop α β).exists_ne_zero.choose_spec.1).choose
lemma chainLength_of_isZero (hα : α.IsZero) : chainLength α β = 0 := dif_pos hα
lemma chainLength_nsmul {x} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H (chainTop α β)) :
chainLength α β • x = ⁅coroot α, x⁆ := by
by_cases hα : α.IsZero
· rw [coroot_eq_zero_iff.mpr hα, chainLength_of_isZero _ _ hα, zero_smul, zero_lie]
let x' := (chainTop α β).exists_ne_zero.choose
have h : x' ∈ rootSpace H (chainTop α β) ∧ x' ≠ 0 :=
(chainTop α β).exists_ne_zero.choose_spec
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : ∃ k : K, k • x' = x := by
simpa using (finrank_eq_one_iff_of_nonzero' ⟨x', h.1⟩ (by simpa using h.2)).mp
(finrank_rootSpace_eq_one _ (chainTop_isNonZero α β hα)) ⟨_, hx⟩
rw [lie_smul, smul_comm, chainLength, dif_neg hα, (chainLength_aux α β hα h.1).choose_spec]
lemma chainLength_smul {x} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H (chainTop α β)) :
(chainLength α β : K) • x = ⁅coroot α, x⁆ := by
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul, chainLength_nsmul _ _ hx]
lemma apply_coroot_eq_cast' :
β (coroot α) = ↑(chainLength α β - 2 * chainTopCoeff α β : ℤ) := by
by_cases hα : α.IsZero
· rw [coroot_eq_zero_iff.mpr hα, chainLength, dif_pos hα, hα.eq, chainTopCoeff_zero, map_zero,
CharP.cast_eq_zero, mul_zero, sub_self, Int.cast_zero]
obtain ⟨x, hx, x_ne0⟩ := (chainTop α β).exists_ne_zero
have := chainLength_smul _ _ hx
rw [lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace hx, ← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul,
smul_eq_zero_iff_left x_ne0, sub_eq_zero, coe_chainTop', nsmul_eq_mul, Pi.natCast_def,
Pi.add_apply, Pi.mul_apply, root_apply_coroot hα] at this
simp only [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_ofNat, eq_sub_iff_add_eq',
this, mul_comm (2 : K)]
lemma rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_le {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ chainLength α β) :
rootSpace H (- (n • α) + chainTop α β) ≠ ⊥ := by
by_cases hα : α.IsZero
· simpa only [hα.eq, smul_zero, neg_zero, chainTop_zero, zero_add, ne_eq] using β.2
obtain ⟨x, hx, x_ne0⟩ := (chainTop α β).exists_ne_zero
obtain ⟨h, e, f, isSl2, he, hf⟩ := exists_isSl2Triple_of_weight_isNonZero hα
obtain rfl := isSl2.h_eq_coroot hα he hf
have prim : isSl2.HasPrimitiveVectorWith x (chainLength α β : K) :=
have := lie_mem_genWeightSpace_of_mem_genWeightSpace he hx
⟨x_ne0, (chainLength_smul _ _ hx).symm, by rwa [genWeightSpace_add_chainTop _ _ hα] at this⟩
simp only [← smul_neg, ne_eq, LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨_, toEnd_pow_apply_mem hf hx n, prim.pow_toEnd_f_ne_zero_of_eq_nat rfl hn⟩
lemma rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_lt (hα : α.IsNonZero) {n : ℕ} (hn : chainLength α β < n) :
rootSpace H (- (n • α) + chainTop α β) = ⊥ := by
by_contra e
let W : Weight K H L := ⟨_, e⟩
have hW : (W : H → K) = - (n • α) + chainTop α β := rfl
have H₁ : 1 + n + chainTopCoeff (-α) W ≤ chainLength (-α) W := by
have := apply_coroot_eq_cast' (-α) W
simp only [coroot_neg, map_neg, hW, nsmul_eq_mul, Pi.natCast_def, coe_chainTop, zsmul_eq_mul,
Int.cast_natCast, Pi.add_apply, Pi.neg_apply, Pi.mul_apply, root_apply_coroot hα, mul_two,
neg_add_rev, apply_coroot_eq_cast' α β, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_ofNat,
mul_comm (2 : K), add_sub_cancel, neg_neg, add_sub, Nat.cast_inj,
eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← Nat.cast_add, ← sub_eq_neg_add, sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at this
omega
have H₂ : ((1 + n + chainTopCoeff (-α) W) • α + chainTop (-α) W : H → K) =
(chainTopCoeff α β + 1) • α + β := by
simp only [Weight.coe_neg, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℤ, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, coe_chainTop,
smul_neg, ← neg_smul, hW, ← add_assoc, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
congr 2
ring
have := rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_le (-α) W H₁
rw [Weight.coe_neg, ← smul_neg, neg_neg, ← Weight.coe_neg, H₂] at this
exact this (genWeightSpace_chainTopCoeff_add_one_nsmul_add α β hα)
lemma chainTopCoeff_le_chainLength : chainTopCoeff α β ≤ chainLength α β := by
by_cases hα : α.IsZero
· simp only [hα.eq, chainTopCoeff_zero, zero_le]
rw [← not_lt, ← Nat.succ_le]
intro e
apply genWeightSpace_nsmul_add_ne_bot_of_le α β
(Nat.sub_le (chainTopCoeff α β) (chainLength α β).succ)
rw [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℤ, Nat.cast_sub e, sub_smul, sub_eq_neg_add,
add_assoc, ← coe_chainTop, Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_lt α β hα (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff :
chainBotCoeff α β + chainTopCoeff α β = chainLength α β := by
by_cases hα : α.IsZero
· rw [hα.eq, chainTopCoeff_zero, chainBotCoeff_zero, zero_add, chainLength_of_isZero α β hα]
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le (chainTopCoeff_le_chainLength α β),
← not_lt, ← Nat.succ_le, chainBotCoeff, ← Weight.coe_neg]
intro e
apply genWeightSpace_nsmul_add_ne_bot_of_le _ _ e
rw [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℤ, Nat.cast_succ, Nat.cast_sub (chainTopCoeff_le_chainLength α β),
LieModule.Weight.coe_neg, smul_neg, ← neg_smul, neg_add_rev, neg_sub, sub_eq_neg_add,
← add_assoc, ← neg_add_rev, add_smul, add_assoc, ← coe_chainTop, neg_smul,
← @Nat.cast_one ℤ, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_lt α β hα (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
· rw [← not_lt]
intro e
apply rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_le α β e
rw [← Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℤ, ← neg_smul, coe_chainTop, ← add_assoc,
← add_smul, Nat.cast_add, neg_add, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero, neg_smul, ← smul_neg,
Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact genWeightSpace_chainTopCoeff_add_one_nsmul_add (-α) β (Weight.IsNonZero.neg hα)
lemma chainTopCoeff_add_chainBotCoeff :
chainTopCoeff α β + chainBotCoeff α β = chainLength α β := by
rw [add_comm, chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff]
lemma chainBotCoeff_le_chainLength : chainBotCoeff α β ≤ chainLength α β :=
(Nat.le_add_left _ _).trans_eq (chainTopCoeff_add_chainBotCoeff α β)
@[simp]
lemma chainLength_neg :
chainLength (-α) β = chainLength α β := by
rw [← chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff, ← chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff, add_comm,
Weight.coe_neg, chainTopCoeff_neg, chainBotCoeff_neg]
@[simp]
lemma chainLength_zero [Nontrivial L] : chainLength 0 β = 0 := by
simp [← chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff]
/-- If `β - qα ... β ... β + rα` is the `α`-chain through `β`, then
`β (coroot α) = q - r`. In particular, it is an integer. -/
lemma apply_coroot_eq_cast :
β (coroot α) = (chainBotCoeff α β - chainTopCoeff α β : ℤ) := by
rw [apply_coroot_eq_cast', ← chainTopCoeff_add_chainBotCoeff]; congr 1; omega
lemma le_chainBotCoeff_of_rootSpace_ne_top
(hα : α.IsNonZero) (n : ℤ) (hn : rootSpace H (-n • α + β) ≠ ⊥) :
n ≤ chainBotCoeff α β := by
contrapose! hn
lift n to ℕ using (Nat.cast_nonneg _).trans hn.le
rw [Nat.cast_lt, ← @Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right (chainTopCoeff α β),
chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff] at hn
have := rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_lt α β hα hn
rwa [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℤ, ← neg_smul, coe_chainTop, ← add_assoc,
← add_smul, Nat.cast_add, neg_add, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero] at this
/-- Members of the `α`-chain through `β` are the only roots of the form `β - kα`. -/
lemma rootSpace_zsmul_add_ne_bot_iff (hα : α.IsNonZero) (n : ℤ) :
rootSpace H (n • α + β) ≠ ⊥ ↔ n ≤ chainTopCoeff α β ∧ -n ≤ chainBotCoeff α β := by
constructor
· refine (fun hn ↦ ⟨?_, le_chainBotCoeff_of_rootSpace_ne_top α β hα _ (by rwa [neg_neg])⟩)
rw [← chainBotCoeff_neg, ← Weight.coe_neg]
apply le_chainBotCoeff_of_rootSpace_ne_top _ _ hα.neg
rwa [neg_smul, Weight.coe_neg, smul_neg, neg_neg]
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
set k := chainTopCoeff α β - n with hk; clear_value k
lift k to ℕ using (by rw [hk, le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]; exact h₁)
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq'] at hk
subst hk
simp only [neg_sub, tsub_le_iff_right, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le,
chainBotCoeff_add_chainTopCoeff] at h₂
have := rootSpace_neg_nsmul_add_chainTop_of_le α β h₂
rwa [coe_chainTop, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℤ, ← neg_smul,
← add_assoc, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_neg_add] at this
lemma rootSpace_zsmul_add_ne_bot_iff_mem (hα : α.IsNonZero) (n : ℤ) :
rootSpace H (n • α + β) ≠ ⊥ ↔ n ∈ Finset.Icc (-chainBotCoeff α β : ℤ) (chainTopCoeff α β) := by
rw [rootSpace_zsmul_add_ne_bot_iff α β hα n, Finset.mem_Icc, and_comm, neg_le]
lemma chainTopCoeff_of_eq_zsmul_add
(hα : α.IsNonZero) (β' : Weight K H L) (n : ℤ) (hβ' : (β' : H → K) = n • α + β) :
chainTopCoeff α β' = chainTopCoeff α β - n := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine le_sub_iff_add_le.mpr ((rootSpace_zsmul_add_ne_bot_iff α β hα _).mp ?_).1
rw [add_smul, add_assoc, ← hβ', ← coe_chainTop]
| exact (chainTop α β').2
· refine ((rootSpace_zsmul_add_ne_bot_iff α β' hα _).mp ?_).1
rw [hβ', ← add_assoc, ← add_smul, sub_add_cancel, ← coe_chainTop]
exact (chainTop α β).2
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Weights/RootSystem.lean | 230 | 234 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basis
/-!
# Rank of various constructions
## Main statements
- `rank_quotient_add_rank_le` : `rank M/N + rank N ≤ rank M`.
- `lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod`: `rank M × N ≤ rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_span_le_of_finite`: `rank (span s) ≤ #s` for finite `s`.
For free modules, we have
- `rank_prod` : `rank M × N = rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_finsupp` : `rank (ι →₀ M) = #ι * rank M`
- `rank_directSum`: `rank (⨁ Mᵢ) = ∑ rank Mᵢ`
- `rank_tensorProduct`: `rank (M ⊗ N) = rank M * rank N`.
Lemmas for ranks of submodules and subalgebras are also provided.
We have finrank variants for most lemmas as well.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u u' v v' u₁' w w'
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type u'} {M : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {M₁ : Type v}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Basis Cardinal DirectSum Function Module Set Submodule
section Quotient
variable [Ring R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M]
theorem LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
{M' : Submodule R M} {ι₁ ι₂} {f : ι₁ → M'} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) (g : ι₂ → M)
(hg : LinearIndependent R (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := M') ∘ g)) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim (f · : ι₁ → M) g) := by
refine .sum_type (hf.map' M'.subtype M'.ker_subtype) (.of_comp M'.mkQ hg) ?_
refine disjoint_def.mpr fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
have : x ∈ M' := span_le.mpr (Set.range_subset_iff.mpr fun i ↦ (f i).prop) h₁
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp.mp h₂
simp_rw [← Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← mkQ_apply, map_finsuppSum, map_smul, mkQ_apply] at this
rw [linearIndependent_iff.mp hg _ this, Finsupp.sum_zero_index]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias LinearIndependent.sum_elim_of_quotient := LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_of_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t) : LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
apply hs.union ht.of_comp
convert (Submodule.range_ker_disjoint ht).symm
· simp
aesop
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient {M' : Submodule R M}
{s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ M') (hs' : LinearIndepOn R id s) {t : Set M}
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ M') t) : LinearIndepOn R id (s ∪ t) :=
hs'.union_of_quotient <| by
rw [image_id]
exact ht.of_comp ((span R s).mapQ M' (LinearMap.id) (span_le.2 hs))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias LinearIndependent.union_of_quotient :=
LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient
theorem linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) ↔
LinearIndepOn R f s ∧ LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.union_of_quotient h.2⟩
· exact h.mono subset_union_left
apply (h.mono subset_union_right).map
simpa [← image_eq_range] using ((linearIndepOn_union_iff hst).1 h).2.2.symm
theorem LinearIndepOn.quotient_iff_union {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t ↔ LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
rw [linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient hst, and_iff_right hs]
theorem rank_quotient_add_rank_le [Nontrivial R] (M' : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ M') + Module.rank R M' ≤ Module.rank R M := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R (M ⧸ M')
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M'
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
refine ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ ?_
choose f hf using Submodule.Quotient.mk_surjective M'
simpa [add_comm] using (LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient ht (fun (i : s) ↦ f i)
(by simpa [Function.comp_def, hf] using hs)).cardinal_le_rank
theorem rank_quotient_le (p : Submodule R M) : Module.rank R (M ⧸ p) ≤ Module.rank R M :=
(mkQ p).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective
/-- The dimension of a quotient is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_quotient_le [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Finite R M]
(s : Submodule R M) : finrank R (M ⧸ s) ≤ finrank R M :=
toNat_le_toNat ((Submodule.mkQ s).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective)
(rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
end Quotient
variable [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
variable [Module R M]
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem rank_ulift : Module.rank R (ULift.{w} M) = Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) :=
Cardinal.lift_injective.{v} <| Eq.symm <| (lift_lift _).trans ULift.moduleEquiv.symm.lift_rank_eq
@[simp]
theorem finrank_ulift : finrank R (ULift M) = finrank R M := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_ulift, toNat_lift]
end ULift
section Prod
variable (R M M')
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M']
theorem rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ ≤ Module.rank R (M × M₁) := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M₁
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦
(linearIndependent_inl_union_inr' hs ht).cardinal_le_rank
theorem lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') ≤ Module.rank R (M × M') := by
rw [← rank_ulift, ← rank_ulift]
exact (rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod R _).trans_eq
(ULift.moduleEquiv.prodCongr ULift.moduleEquiv).rank_eq
variable {R M M'}
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Free R M'] [Module.Free R M₁]
open Module.Free
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free, then the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M).lift + (Module.rank R M').lift`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_prod : Module.rank R (M × M') =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + Cardinal.lift.{v, v'} (Module.rank R M') := by
simpa [rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M, rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M', lift_umax]
using ((chooseBasis R M).prod (chooseBasis R M')).mk_eq_rank.symm
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free (and lie in the same universe), the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M) + (Module.rank R M')`. -/
theorem rank_prod' : Module.rank R (M × M₁) = Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ := by simp
/-- The finrank of `M × M'` is `(finrank R M) + (finrank R M')`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_prod [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M'] :
finrank R (M × M') = finrank R M + finrank R M' := by
simp [finrank, rank_lt_aleph0 R M, rank_lt_aleph0 R M']
end Prod
section Finsupp
variable (R M M')
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module R M'] [Module.Free R M']
open Module.Free
@[simp]
theorem rank_finsupp (ι : Type w) :
Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι * Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, bs⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← bs.mk_eq_rank'', ← (Finsupp.basis fun _ : ι => bs).mk_eq_rank'', Cardinal.mk_sigma,
Cardinal.sum_const]
theorem rank_finsupp' (ι : Type v) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = #ι * Module.rank R M := by
simp [rank_finsupp]
/-- The rank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `(#ι).lift`. -/
theorem rank_finsupp_self (ι : Type w) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} #ι := by
simp
/-- If `R` and `ι` lie in the same universe, the rank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `# ι`. -/
theorem rank_finsupp_self' {ι : Type u} : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = #ι := by simp
/-- The rank of the direct sum is the sum of the ranks. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_directSum {ι : Type v} (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] :
Module.rank R (⨁ i, M i) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (M i) := by
let B i := chooseBasis R (M i)
let b : Basis _ R (⨁ i, M i) := DFinsupp.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite, the rank of `m × n` matrices over a module `M` is
`(#m).lift * (#n).lift * rank R M`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_matrix_module (m : Type w) (n : Type w') [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n M) =
lift.{max v w'} #m * lift.{max v w} #n * lift.{max w w'} (Module.rank R M) := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
cases nonempty_fintype n
obtain ⟨I, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← (b.matrix m n).mk_eq_rank'']
simp only [mk_prod, lift_mul, lift_lift, ← mul_assoc, b.mk_eq_rank'']
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe, the rank of `m × n` matrices over a
module `M` is `(#m * #n).lift * rank R M`. -/
@[simp high]
theorem rank_matrix_module' (m n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n M) =
lift.{max v} (#m * #n) * lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_matrix_module, lift_mul, lift_umax.{w, v}]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite, the rank of `m × n` matrices is `(#m).lift * (#n).lift`. -/
theorem rank_matrix (m : Type v) (n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) =
Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, v} #m * Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, w} #n := by
rw [rank_matrix_module, rank_self, lift_one, mul_one, ← lift_lift.{v, max u w}, lift_id,
← lift_lift.{w, max u v}, lift_id]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe, the rank of `m × n` matrices is
`(#n * #m).lift`. -/
theorem rank_matrix' (m n : Type v) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (#m * #n) := by
rw [rank_matrix, lift_mul, lift_umax.{v, u}]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe as `R`, the rank of `m × n` matrices
is `# m * # n`. -/
theorem rank_matrix'' (m n : Type u) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = #m * #n := by simp
open Fintype
namespace Module
@[simp]
theorem finrank_finsupp {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ M) = card ι * finrank R M := by
rw [finrank, finrank, rank_finsupp, ← mk_toNat_eq_card, toNat_mul, toNat_lift, toNat_lift]
/-- The finrank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `Fintype.card ι`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finrank_finsupp_self {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ R) = card ι := by
rw [finrank, rank_finsupp_self, ← mk_toNat_eq_card, toNat_lift]
/-- The finrank of the direct sum is the sum of the finranks. -/
@[simp]
theorem finrank_directSum {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Finite R (M i)] :
finrank R (⨁ i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) := by
letI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
simp only [finrank, fun i => rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R (M i), rank_directSum, ← mk_sigma,
mk_toNat_eq_card, card_sigma]
/-- If `m` and `n` are `Fintype`, the finrank of `m × n` matrices over a module `M` is
`(Fintype.card m) * (Fintype.card n) * finrank R M`. -/
theorem finrank_matrix (m n : Type*) [Fintype m] [Fintype n] :
finrank R (Matrix m n M) = card m * card n * finrank R M := by simp [finrank]
end Module
end Finsupp
section Pi
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (φ i)] [∀ i, Module R (φ i)] [∀ i, Module.Free R (φ i)]
open Module.Free
open LinearMap
/-- The rank of a finite product of free modules is the sum of the ranks. -/
-- this result is not true without the freeness assumption
@[simp]
theorem rank_pi [Finite η] : Module.rank R (∀ i, φ i) =
Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (φ i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype η
let B i := chooseBasis R (φ i)
let b : Basis _ R (∀ i, φ i) := Pi.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
variable (R)
/-- The finrank of `(ι → R)` is `Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_pi {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] :
finrank R (ι → R) = Fintype.card ι := by
simp [finrank]
--TODO: this should follow from `LinearEquiv.finrank_eq`, that is over a field.
/-- The finrank of a finite product is the sum of the finranks. -/
theorem Module.finrank_pi_fintype
{ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] {M : ι → Type w} [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Finite R (M i)] :
finrank R (∀ i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) := by
letI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
simp only [finrank, fun i => rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R (M i), rank_pi, ← mk_sigma,
mk_toNat_eq_card, Fintype.card_sigma]
variable {R}
variable [Fintype η]
theorem rank_fun {M η : Type u} [Fintype η] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] :
Module.rank R (η → M) = Fintype.card η * Module.rank R M := by
rw [rank_pi, Cardinal.sum_const', Cardinal.mk_fintype]
theorem rank_fun_eq_lift_mul : Module.rank R (η → M) =
(Fintype.card η : Cardinal.{max u₁' v}) * Cardinal.lift.{u₁'} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_pi, Cardinal.sum_const, Cardinal.mk_fintype, Cardinal.lift_natCast]
theorem rank_fun' : Module.rank R (η → R) = Fintype.card η := by
rw [rank_fun_eq_lift_mul, rank_self, Cardinal.lift_one, mul_one]
theorem rank_fin_fun (n : ℕ) : Module.rank R (Fin n → R) = n := by simp [rank_fun']
variable (R)
/-- The vector space of functions on a `Fintype ι` has finrank equal to the cardinality of `ι`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_fintype_fun_eq_card : finrank R (η → R) = Fintype.card η :=
finrank_eq_of_rank_eq rank_fun'
/-- The vector space of functions on `Fin n` has finrank equal to `n`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_fin_fun {n : ℕ} : finrank R (Fin n → R) = n := by simp
variable {R}
-- TODO: merge with the `Finrank` content
/-- An `n`-dimensional `R`-vector space is equivalent to `Fin n → R`. -/
def finDimVectorspaceEquiv (n : ℕ) (hn : Module.rank R M = n) : M ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
have : Cardinal.lift.{u} (n : Cardinal.{v}) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (n : Cardinal.{u}) := by simp
have hn := Cardinal.lift_inj.{v, u}.2 hn
rw [this] at hn
rw [← @rank_fin_fun R _ _ n] at hn
haveI : Module.Free R (Fin n → R) := Module.Free.pi _ _
exact Classical.choice (nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq hn)
end Pi
section TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [StrongRankCondition S]
variable [Module S M] [Module S M'] [Module.Free S M']
variable [Module S M₁] [Module.Free S M₁]
variable [Algebra S R] [IsScalarTower S R M] [Module.Free R M]
open Module.Free
/-- The `S`-rank of `M ⊗[R] M'` is `(Module.rank S M).lift * (Module.rank R M').lift`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_tensorProduct :
Module.rank R (M ⊗[S] M') =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) * Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank S M') := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, bM⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
obtain ⟨⟨_, bN⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := S) (M := M')
rw [← bM.mk_eq_rank'', ← bN.mk_eq_rank'', ← (bM.tensorProduct bN).mk_eq_rank'', Cardinal.mk_prod]
/-- If `M` and `M'` lie in the same universe, the `S`-rank of `M ⊗[R] M'` is
`(Module.rank S M) * (Module.rank R M')`. -/
theorem rank_tensorProduct' :
Module.rank R (M ⊗[S] M₁) = Module.rank R M * Module.rank S M₁ := by simp
theorem Module.rank_baseChange :
Module.rank R (R ⊗[S] M') = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Module.rank S M') := by simp
/-- The `S`-finrank of `M ⊗[R] M'` is `(finrank S M) * (finrank R M')`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_tensorProduct :
finrank R (M ⊗[S] M') = finrank R M * finrank S M' := by simp [finrank]
theorem Module.finrank_baseChange : finrank R (R ⊗[S] M') = finrank S M' := by simp
end TensorProduct
section SubmoduleRank
section
open Module
namespace Submodule
theorem lt_of_le_of_finrank_lt_finrank {s t : Submodule R M} (le : s ≤ t)
(lt : finrank R s < finrank R t) : s < t :=
lt_of_le_of_ne le fun h => ne_of_lt lt (by rw [h])
theorem lt_top_of_finrank_lt_finrank {s : Submodule R M} (lt : finrank R s < finrank R M) :
s < ⊤ := by
rw [← finrank_top R M] at lt
exact lt_of_le_of_finrank_lt_finrank le_top lt
end Submodule
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
/-- The dimension of a submodule is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_le [Module.Finite R M] (s : Submodule R M) :
finrank R s ≤ finrank R M :=
toNat_le_toNat (Submodule.rank_le s) (rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
/-- Pushforwards of finite submodules have a smaller finrank. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_map_le
[Module R M'] (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (p : Submodule R M) [Module.Finite R p] :
finrank R (p.map f) ≤ finrank R p :=
finrank_le_finrank_of_rank_le_rank (lift_rank_map_le _ _) (rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
theorem Submodule.finrank_mono {s t : Submodule R M} [Module.Finite R t] (hst : s ≤ t) :
finrank R s ≤ finrank R t :=
Cardinal.toNat_le_toNat (Submodule.rank_mono hst) (rank_lt_aleph0 R ↥t)
end
end SubmoduleRank
section Span
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
theorem rank_span_le (s : Set M) : Module.rank R (span R s) ≤ #s := by
rw [Finsupp.span_eq_range_linearCombination, ← lift_strictMono.le_iff_le]
refine (lift_rank_range_le _).trans ?_
rw [rank_finsupp_self]
simp only [lift_lift, le_refl]
theorem rank_span_finset_le (s : Finset M) : Module.rank R (span R (s : Set M)) ≤ s.card := by
simpa using rank_span_le s.toSet
theorem rank_span_of_finset (s : Finset M) : Module.rank R (span R (s : Set M)) < ℵ₀ :=
(rank_span_finset_le s).trans_lt (Cardinal.nat_lt_aleph0 _)
open Submodule Module
variable (R) in
/-- The rank of a set of vectors as a natural number. -/
protected noncomputable def Set.finrank (s : Set M) : ℕ :=
finrank R (span R s)
theorem finrank_span_le_card (s : Set M) [Fintype s] : finrank R (span R s) ≤ s.toFinset.card :=
finrank_le_of_rank_le (by simpa using rank_span_le (R := R) s)
theorem finrank_span_finset_le_card (s : Finset M) : (s : Set M).finrank R ≤ s.card :=
calc
(s : Set M).finrank R ≤ (s : Set M).toFinset.card := finrank_span_le_card (M := M) s
_ = s.card := by simp
theorem finrank_range_le_card {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (b : ι → M) :
(Set.range b).finrank R ≤ Fintype.card ι := by
classical
refine (finrank_span_le_card _).trans ?_
rw [Set.toFinset_range]
exact Finset.card_image_le
theorem finrank_span_eq_card [Nontrivial R] {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → M}
(hb : LinearIndependent R b) :
finrank R (span R (Set.range b)) = Fintype.card ι :=
finrank_eq_of_rank_eq
(by
have : Module.rank R (span R (Set.range b)) = #(Set.range b) := rank_span hb
rwa [← lift_inj, mk_range_eq_of_injective hb.injective, Cardinal.mk_fintype, lift_natCast,
lift_eq_nat_iff] at this)
theorem finrank_span_set_eq_card {s : Set M} [Fintype s] (hs : LinearIndepOn R id s) :
finrank R (span R s) = s.toFinset.card :=
finrank_eq_of_rank_eq
(by
have : Module.rank R (span R s) = #s := rank_span_set hs
rwa [Cardinal.mk_fintype, ← Set.toFinset_card] at this)
theorem finrank_span_finset_eq_card {s : Finset M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R id (s : Set M)) :
finrank R (span R (s : Set M)) = s.card := by
convert finrank_span_set_eq_card (s := (s : Set M)) hs
ext
simp
theorem span_lt_of_subset_of_card_lt_finrank {s : Set M} [Fintype s] {t : Submodule R M}
(subset : s ⊆ t) (card_lt : s.toFinset.card < finrank R t) : span R s < t :=
lt_of_le_of_finrank_lt_finrank (span_le.mpr subset)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (finrank_span_le_card _) card_lt)
theorem span_lt_top_of_card_lt_finrank {s : Set M} [Fintype s]
(card_lt : s.toFinset.card < finrank R M) : span R s < ⊤ :=
lt_top_of_finrank_lt_finrank (lt_of_le_of_lt (finrank_span_le_card _) card_lt)
lemma finrank_le_of_span_eq_top {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {v : ι → M}
(hv : Submodule.span R (Set.range v) = ⊤) : finrank R M ≤ Fintype.card ι := by
classical
rw [← finrank_top, ← hv]
exact (finrank_span_le_card _).trans (by convert Fintype.card_range_le v; rw [Set.toFinset_card])
end Span
section SubalgebraRank
open Module
section Semiring
variable {F E : Type*} [CommSemiring F] [Semiring E] [Algebra F E]
@[simp]
theorem Subalgebra.rank_toSubmodule (S : Subalgebra F E) :
Module.rank F (Subalgebra.toSubmodule S) = Module.rank F S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Subalgebra.finrank_toSubmodule (S : Subalgebra F E) :
finrank F (Subalgebra.toSubmodule S) = finrank F S :=
rfl
theorem subalgebra_top_rank_eq_submodule_top_rank :
Module.rank F (⊤ : Subalgebra F E) = Module.rank F (⊤ : Submodule F E) := by
rw [← Algebra.top_toSubmodule]
rfl
theorem subalgebra_top_finrank_eq_submodule_top_finrank :
finrank F (⊤ : Subalgebra F E) = finrank F (⊤ : Submodule F E) := by
rw [← Algebra.top_toSubmodule]
rfl
theorem Subalgebra.rank_top : Module.rank F (⊤ : Subalgebra F E) = Module.rank F E := by
rw [subalgebra_top_rank_eq_submodule_top_rank]
exact _root_.rank_top F E
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F E : Type*} [CommRing F] [Ring E] [Algebra F E]
variable [StrongRankCondition F] [NoZeroSMulDivisors F E] [Nontrivial E]
@[simp]
theorem Subalgebra.rank_bot : Module.rank F (⊥ : Subalgebra F E) = 1 :=
(Subalgebra.toSubmoduleEquiv (⊥ : Subalgebra F E)).symm.rank_eq.trans <| by
rw [Algebra.toSubmodule_bot, one_eq_span, rank_span_set, mk_singleton _]
letI := Module.nontrivial F E
exact LinearIndepOn.id_singleton _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem Subalgebra.finrank_bot : finrank F (⊥ : Subalgebra F E) = 1 :=
finrank_eq_of_rank_eq (by simp)
end Ring
end SubalgebraRank
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Constructions.lean | 561 | 565 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series (in one variable)
This file defines (univariate) formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
Formal power series in one variable are defined from multivariate
power series as `PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
The file sets up the (semi)ring structure on univariate power series.
We provide the natural inclusion from polynomials to formal power series.
Additional results can be found in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc`, truncation of power series;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse`, about inverses of power series,
and the fact that power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Order`, the order of a power series at 0,
and application to the fact that power series over an integral domain
form an integral domain.
## Implementation notes
Because of its definition,
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
a lot of proofs and properties from the multivariate case
can be ported to the single variable case.
However, it means that formal power series are indexed by `Unit →₀ ℕ`,
which is of course canonically isomorphic to `ℕ`.
We then build some glue to treat formal power series as if they were indexed by `ℕ`.
Occasionally this leads to proofs that are uglier than expected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Formal power series over a coefficient type `R` -/
abbrev PowerSeries (R : Type*) :=
MvPowerSeries Unit R
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section
-- Porting note: not available in Lean 4
-- local reducible PowerSeries
/--
`R⟦X⟧` is notation for `PowerSeries R`,
the semiring of formal power series in one variable over a semiring `R`.
-/
scoped notation:9000 R "⟦X⟧" => PowerSeries R
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Zero R] : Zero R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Semiring R] : Semiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Ring R] : Ring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S A⟦X⟧ :=
Pi.isScalarTower
instance {A} [Semiring A] [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R A] : Algebra R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
end
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : R⟦X⟧ →ₗ[R] R :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff R (single () n)
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as formal power series. -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.monomial R (single () n)
variable {R}
theorem coeff_def {s : Unit →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : s () = n) : coeff R n = MvPowerSeries.coeff R s := by
rw [coeff, ← h, ← Finsupp.unique_single s]
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : ∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun n => by
rw [← coeff_def]
· apply h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_coeff_eq_zero (φ : R⟦X⟧) : (∀ n, coeff R n φ = 0) ↔ φ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ext h, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc PowerSeries.ext_iff
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
subsingleton
/-- Constructor for formal power series. -/
def mk {R} (f : ℕ → R) : R⟦X⟧ := fun s => f (s ())
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R) : coeff R n (mk f) = f n :=
congr_arg f Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial (m n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
calc
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = _ := MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial _ _ _
_ = if m = n then a else 0 := by simp only [Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff]
theorem monomial_eq_mk (n : ℕ) (a : R) : monomial R n a = mk fun m => if m = n then a else 0 :=
ext fun m => by rw [coeff_monomial, coeff_mk]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
variable (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : R⟦X⟧ →+* R :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff Unit R
/-- The constant formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.C Unit R
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_eq {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] : algebraMap R R⟦X⟧ = C R := rfl
variable {R}
/-- The variable of the formal power series ring. -/
def X : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.X ()
theorem commute_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : Commute φ X :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X _ _
theorem X_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = φ * X :=
MvPowerSeries.X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X ^ n) :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X_pow _ _ _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * φ = φ * X ^ n :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R 0) = constantCoeff R := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero]
rfl
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 φ = constantCoeff R φ := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R 0) = C R := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `rw; rfl` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [monomial, Finsupp.single_zero, MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C]
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R 0 a = C R a := by simp
theorem coeff_C (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then a else 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R 0 (C R a) = a := by
rw [coeff_C, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_ne_zero_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : coeff R n (C R a) = 0 := by
rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff R (n + 1) (C R a) = 0 :=
coeff_ne_zero_C n.succ_ne_zero
theorem C_injective : Function.Injective (C R) := by
intro a b H
simp_rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at H
simpa only [coeff_zero_C] using H 0
protected theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ ↔ Subsingleton R := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
rw [subsingleton_iff] at h ⊢
exact fun a b ↦ C_injective (h (C R a) (C R b))
theorem X_eq : (X : R⟦X⟧) = monomial R 1 1 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_X (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (X : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 1 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X : coeff R 0 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero, X, MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_X : coeff R 1 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 1 := by rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : (X : R⟦X⟧) ≠ 0 := fun H => by
simpa only [coeff_one_X, one_ne_zero, map_zero] using congr_arg (coeff R 1) H
theorem X_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n = monomial R n 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_eq _ n
theorem coeff_X_pow (m n : ℕ) : coeff R m ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = if m = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff R n ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = 1 := by
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (1 : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C n 1
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R 0 (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_mul (n : ℕ) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
-- `rw` can't see that `PowerSeries = MvPowerSeries Unit`, so use `.trans`
refine (MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul _ φ ψ).trans ?_
rw [Finsupp.antidiagonal_single, Finset.sum_map]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : coeff R n (φ * C R a) = coeff R n φ * a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_C _ φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_C_mul _ φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S] (n : ℕ) (φ : PowerSeries S) (a : R) :
coeff S n (a • φ) = a • coeff S n φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S] (φ : PowerSeries S) (a : R) :
constantCoeff S (a • φ) = a • constantCoeff S φ :=
rfl
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (f : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : a • f = C R a * f := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_mul_X (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R (n + 1) (φ * X) = coeff R n φ := by
simp only [coeff, Finsupp.single_add]
convert φ.coeff_add_mul_monomial (single () n) (single () 1) _
rw [mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_X_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R (n + 1) (X * φ) = coeff R n φ := by
simp only [coeff, Finsupp.single_add, add_comm n 1]
convert φ.coeff_add_monomial_mul (single () 1) (single () n) _
rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_X_cancel {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : φ * X = ψ * X) : φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + 1)
theorem mul_X_injective : Function.Injective (· * X : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ mul_X_cancel
theorem mul_X_inj {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} : φ * X = ψ * X ↔ φ = ψ :=
mul_X_injective.eq_iff
theorem X_mul_cancel {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : X * φ = X * ψ) : φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + 1)
theorem X_mul_injective : Function.Injective (X * · : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ X_mul_cancel
theorem X_mul_inj {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = X * ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
X_mul_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (a : R) : constantCoeff R (C R a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : (constantCoeff R).comp (C R) = RingHom.id R :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_zero : constantCoeff R 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_one : constantCoeff R 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X : constantCoeff R X = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X _
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_mk {f : ℕ → R} : constantCoeff R (mk f) = f 0 := rfl
theorem coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 (φ * X) = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 (X * φ) = 0 := by simp
theorem constantCoeff_surj : Function.Surjective (constantCoeff R) :=
fun r => ⟨(C R) r, constantCoeff_C r⟩
-- The following section duplicates the API of `Data.Polynomial.Coeff` and should attempt to keep
-- up to date with that
section
theorem coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (C R x * X ^ k : R⟦X⟧) = if n = k then x else 0 := by
simp [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R (d + n) (p * X ^ n) = coeff R d p := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (d, n), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, mul_one]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R (d + n) (X ^ n * p) = coeff R d p := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (n, d), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, one_mul]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_comm, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· rw [add_comm]
exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
theorem mul_X_pow_cancel {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : φ * X ^ k = ψ * X ^ k) :
φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + k)
theorem mul_X_pow_injective {k : ℕ} : Function.Injective (· * X ^ k : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ mul_X_pow_cancel
theorem mul_X_pow_inj {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} :
φ * X ^ k = ψ * X ^ k ↔ φ = ψ :=
mul_X_pow_injective.eq_iff
| theorem X_pow_mul_cancel {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : X ^ k * φ = X ^ k * ψ) :
φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + k)
theorem X_pow_mul_injective {k : ℕ} : Function.Injective (X ^ k * · : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ X_pow_mul_cancel
theorem X_pow_mul_inj {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} :
X ^ k * φ = X ^ k * ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Basic.lean | 438 | 448 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Transferring `Traversable` instances along isomorphisms
This file allows to transfer `Traversable` instances along isomorphisms.
## Main declarations
* `Equiv.map`: Turns functorially a function `α → β` into a function `t' α → t' β` using the functor
`t` and the equivalence `Π α, t α ≃ t' α`.
* `Equiv.functor`: `Equiv.map` as a functor.
* `Equiv.traverse`: Turns traversably a function `α → m β` into a function `t' α → m (t' β)` using
the traversable functor `t` and the equivalence `Π α, t α ≃ t' α`.
* `Equiv.traversable`: `Equiv.traverse` as a traversable functor.
* `Equiv.isLawfulTraversable`: `Equiv.traverse` as a lawful traversable functor.
-/
universe u
namespace Equiv
section Functor
-- Porting note: `parameter` doesn't seem to work yet.
variable {t t' : Type u → Type u} (eqv : ∀ α, t α ≃ t' α)
variable [Functor t]
open Functor
/-- Given a functor `t`, a function `t' : Type u → Type u`, and
equivalences `t α ≃ t' α` for all `α`, then every function `α → β` can
be mapped to a function `t' α → t' β` functorially (see
`Equiv.functor`). -/
protected def map {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (x : t' α) : t' β :=
eqv β <| map f ((eqv α).symm x)
/-- The function `Equiv.map` transfers the functoriality of `t` to
`t'` using the equivalences `eqv`. -/
protected def functor : Functor t' where map := Equiv.map eqv
variable [LawfulFunctor t]
protected theorem id_map {α : Type u} (x : t' α) : Equiv.map eqv id x = x := by
simp [Equiv.map, id_map]
protected theorem comp_map {α β γ : Type u} (g : α → β) (h : β → γ) (x : t' α) :
Equiv.map eqv (h ∘ g) x = Equiv.map eqv h (Equiv.map eqv g x) := by
| simp [Equiv.map, Function.comp_def]
| Mathlib/Control/Traversable/Equiv.lean | 56 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe uR uS uA uB uM uN
variable (R : Type uR) (S : Type uS) (A : Type uA) (B : Type uB) (M : Type uM) (N : Type uN)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is of `FiniteType` if it is finitely generated
over the base ring as algebra. -/
class Algebra.FiniteType [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Finite
open Submodule Set
variable {R S M N}
section Algebra
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) finiteType {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] [hRA : Module.Finite R A] : Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨Subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg hRA.1⟩
end Algebra
end Finite
end Module
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace FiniteType
theorem self : FiniteType R R :=
⟨⟨{1}, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩
protected theorem polynomial : FiniteType R R[X] :=
⟨⟨{Polynomial.X}, by
rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
exact Polynomial.adjoin_X⟩⟩
protected theorem freeAlgebra (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (FreeAlgebra R ι) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image (FreeAlgebra.ι R), by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact FreeAlgebra.adjoin_range_ι R ι⟩⟩
protected theorem mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (MvPolynomial ι R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image MvPolynomial.X, by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X⟩⟩
theorem of_restrictScalars_finiteType [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [hA : FiniteType R A] :
FiniteType S A := by
obtain ⟨s, hS⟩ := hA.out
refine ⟨⟨s, eq_top_iff.2 fun b => ?_⟩⟩
have le : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S s) := by
apply (Algebra.adjoin_le _ : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S ↑s))
simp only [Subalgebra.coe_restrictScalars]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin
exact le (eq_top_iff.1 hS b)
variable {R S A B}
theorem of_surjective (hRA : FiniteType R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : FiniteType R B :=
⟨by
convert hRA.1.map f
simpa only [map_top f, @eq_comm _ ⊤, eq_top_iff, AlgHom.mem_range] using hf⟩
theorem equiv (hRA : FiniteType R A) (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FiniteType R B :=
hRA.of_surjective e e.surjective
theorem trans [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : FiniteType R S) (hSA : FiniteType S A) :
FiniteType R A :=
⟨fg_trans' hRS.1 hSA.1⟩
instance quotient (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] : Algebra.FiniteType R (S ⧸ I) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.trans h inferInstance
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a free algebra whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra :
FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (s : Finset A) (f : FreeAlgebra R s →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, FreeAlgebra.lift _ (↑), ?_⟩
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_range_eq_range_freeAlgebra_lift,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs, coe_top]
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R s) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial :
FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (s : Finset S) (f : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
use s, MvPolynomial.aeval (↑)
intro x
have hrw : (↑s : Set S) = fun x : S => x ∈ s.val := rfl
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_eq_range]
simp_rw [← hrw, hs]
exact Set.mem_univ x
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R { x // x ∈ s }) f hsur
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra' : FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type uA) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : FreeAlgebra R ι →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_freeAlgebra]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : A // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' : FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (ι : Type uS) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : S // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient of a polynomial ring
in `n` variables. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial'' :
FiniteType R S ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial']
rintro ⟨ι, hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
have equiv := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin ι)
exact ⟨Fintype.card ι, AlgHom.comp f equiv.symm.toAlgHom, by simpa using hsur⟩
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R (Fin n)) f hsur
instance prod [hA : FiniteType R A] [hB : FiniteType R B] : FiniteType R (A × B) :=
⟨by rw [← Subalgebra.prod_top]; exact hA.1.prod hB.1⟩
theorem isNoetherianRing (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] [IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing S := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h.1
apply
isNoetherianRing_of_surjective (MvPolynomial s R) S
(MvPolynomial.aeval (↑) : MvPolynomial s R →ₐ[R] S).toRingHom
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, ← AlgHom.coe_range,
← Algebra.adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs]
rfl
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_iff_finiteType (S : Subalgebra R A) : S.FG ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R S :=
S.fg_top.symm.trans ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.out⟩
end FiniteType
end Algebra
end ModuleAndAlgebra
namespace RingHom
variable {A B C : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
/-- A ring morphism `A →+* B` is of `FiniteType` if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
@[algebraize]
def FiniteType (f : A →+* B) : Prop :=
@Algebra.FiniteType A B _ _ f.toAlgebra
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (A) in
theorem id : FiniteType (RingHom.id A) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.self A
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_surjective hf
{ g with
toFun := g
commutes' := fun a => rfl }
hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →+* B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType := by
rw [← f.comp_id]
exact (id A).comp_surjective hf
theorem comp {g : B →+* C} {f : A →+* B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.trans hf hg
theorem of_finite {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : f.FiniteType :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
alias _root_.RingHom.Finite.to_finiteType := of_finite
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType := by
algebraize [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_restrictScalars_finiteType A B C
end FiniteType
end RingHom
namespace AlgHom
variable {R A B C : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R C]
/-- An algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] B` is of `FiniteType` if it is of finite type as ring morphism.
In other words, if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
def FiniteType (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : Prop :=
f.toRingHom.FiniteType
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
RingHom.Finite.finiteType hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (R A)
theorem id : FiniteType (AlgHom.id R A) :=
RingHom.FiniteType.id A
variable {R A}
theorem comp {g : B →ₐ[R] C} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp hg hf
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp_surjective hf hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_surjective f.toRingHom hf
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_comp_finiteType h
end FiniteType
end AlgHom
theorem algebraMap_finiteType_iff_algebra_finiteType {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] : (algebraMap R A).FiniteType ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R A := by
dsimp [RingHom.FiniteType]
constructor <;> (intro h; convert h; apply Algebra.algebra_ext; exact congrFun rfl)
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
open Algebra AddSubmonoid Submodule
section Span
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- An element of `R[M]` is in the subalgebra generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_adjoin_support (f : R[M]) : f ∈ adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support) := by
suffices span R (of' R M '' f.support) ≤
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support)) by
exact this (mem_span_support f)
rw [Submodule.span_le]
exact subset_adjoin
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the set of supports of
elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
refine le_antisymm le_top ?_
rw [← hS, adjoin_le_iff]
intro f hf
have hincl :
of' R M '' f.support ⊆ ⋃ (g : R[M]) (_ : g ∈ S), of' R M '' g.support := by
intro s hs
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨f, ⟨hf, hs⟩⟩
exact adjoin_mono hincl (mem_adjoin_support f)
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the image of the union of
the supports of elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen' {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
suffices (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M) by
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen hS
simp only [Set.image_iUnion]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- If `R[M]` is of finite type, then there is a `G : Finset M` such that its
image generates, as algebra, `R[M]`. -/
theorem exists_finset_adjoin_eq_top [h : FiniteType R R[M]] :
∃ G : Finset M, Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' G) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := h
letI : DecidableEq M := Classical.decEq M
use Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support
have : (Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support : Set M) = ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M) := by
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_coe, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen' hS
/-- The image of an element `m : M` in `R[M]` belongs the submodule generated by
`S : Set M` if and only if `m ∈ S`. -/
theorem of'_mem_span [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M} :
of' R M m ∈ span R (of' R M '' S) ↔ m ∈ S := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Submodule.subset_span <| Set.mem_image_of_mem (of R M) h⟩
unfold of' at h
rw [← Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported,
Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' R)] at h
simpa using h
/--
If the image of an element `m : M` in `R[M]` belongs the submodule generated by
the closure of some `S : Set M` then `m ∈ closure S`. -/
theorem mem_closure_of_mem_span_closure [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M}
(h : of' R M m ∈ span R (Submonoid.closure (of' R M '' S) : Set R[M])) :
m ∈ closure S := by
| suffices Multiplicative.ofAdd m ∈ Submonoid.closure (Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S) by
simpa [← toSubmonoid_closure]
let S' := @Submonoid.closure (Multiplicative M) Multiplicative.mulOneClass S
have h' : Submonoid.map (of R M) S' = Submonoid.closure ((fun x : M => (of R M) x) '' S) :=
MonoidHom.map_mclosure _ _
rw [Set.image_congr' (show ∀ x, of' R M x = of R M x from fun x => of'_eq_of x), ← h'] at h
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean | 393 | 398 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj]
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj, mul_comm]
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
x.norm = y.norm := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [norm_mul, (norm_eq_one_iff' hd _).mpr u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Norm
end
section
variable {d : ℕ}
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def Nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Nonnegg d 1 a b
instance : LE (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => Nonneg (b - a)⟩
instance : LT (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => ¬b ≤ a⟩
instance decidableNonnegg (c d a b) : Decidable (Nonnegg c d a b) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> unfold Nonnegg SqLe <;> infer_instance
instance decidableNonneg : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Decidable (Nonneg a)
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg _ _ _ _
instance decidableLE : DecidableLE (ℤ√d) := fun _ _ => decidableNonneg _
open Int in
theorem nonneg_cases : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[y+1]⟩, _ => ⟨x, y + 1, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x + 1, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, h => False.elim h
open Int in
theorem nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d)) (zw : Nonneg (⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d)) :
Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) := by
have : Nonneg ⟨Int.subNatNat x z, Int.subNatNat w y⟩ :=
Int.subNatNat_elim x z
(fun m n i => SqLe y d m 1 → SqLe n 1 w d → Nonneg ⟨i, Int.subNatNat w y⟩)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d (k + j) 1 → SqLe k 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨Int.ofNat j, i⟩)
(fun _ _ _ _ => trivial) fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel zw xy)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d k 1 → SqLe (k + j + 1) 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨-[j+1], i⟩)
(fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel xy zw) fun m n xy zw =>
let t := Nat.le_trans zw (sqLe_of_le (Nat.le_add_right n (m + 1)) le_rfl xy)
have : k + j + 1 ≤ k :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 (by simpa [one_mul] using t)
absurd this (not_le_of_gt <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_add_right _ _))
(nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw)
rw [add_def, neg_add_eq_sub]
rwa [Int.subNatNat_eq_coe, Int.subNatNat_eq_coe] at this
theorem Nonneg.add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a + b) := by
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩
· trivial
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro y (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro x (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro w (by simp [*])))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
· exact nonneg_add_lem ha hb
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro _ h))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· dsimp
rw [add_comm, add_comm (y : ℤ)]
exact nonneg_add_lem hb ha
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a : ℤ√d} : Nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show _ ↔ Nonneg _ by simp
theorem le_of_le_le {x y z w : ℤ} (xz : x ≤ z) (yw : y ≤ w) : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨z, w⟩ :=
show Nonneg ⟨z - x, w - y⟩ from
match z - x, w - y, Int.le.dest_sub xz, Int.le.dest_sub yw with
| _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => trivial
open Int in
protected theorem nonneg_total : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Nonneg a ∨ Nonneg (-a)
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ => Or.inl trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨(_ + 1 : ℕ), -[_+1]⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
| ⟨-[_+1], (_ + 1 : ℕ)⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
protected theorem le_total (a b : ℤ√d) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
have t := (b - a).nonneg_total
rwa [neg_sub] at t
instance preorder : Preorder (ℤ√d) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := show Nonneg (a - a) by simp only [sub_self]; trivial
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by simpa [sub_add_sub_cancel'] using hab.add hbc
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := (and_iff_right_of_imp (Zsqrtd.le_total _ _).resolve_left).symm
open Int in
theorem le_arch (a : ℤ√d) : ∃ n : ℕ, a ≤ n := by
obtain ⟨x, y, (h : a ≤ ⟨x, y⟩)⟩ : ∃ x y : ℕ, Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ + -a) :=
match -a with
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨0, 0, by trivial⟩
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨0, y + 1, by simp [add_def, Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨x + 1, 0, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨x + 1, y + 1, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
refine ⟨x + d * y, h.trans ?_⟩
change Nonneg ⟨↑x + d * y - ↑x, 0 - ↑y⟩
rcases y with - | y
· simp
trivial
have h : ∀ y, SqLe y d (d * y) 1 := fun y => by
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right (y * y) (Nat.le_mul_self d)
rw [show (x : ℤ) + d * Nat.succ y - x = d * Nat.succ y by simp]
exact h (y + 1)
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (ab : a ≤ b) (c : ℤ√d) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
show Nonneg _ by rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]; exact ab
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (a b c : ℤ√d) (h : c + a ≤ c + b) : a ≤ b := by
simpa using Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left _ _ h (-c)
protected theorem add_lt_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (h : a < b) (c) : c + a < c + b := fun h' =>
h (Zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left _ _ _ h')
theorem nonneg_smul {a : ℤ√d} {n : ℕ} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg ((n : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast n]
exact
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => by rw [smul_val]; trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_muld {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (sqrtd * a) :=
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val, mul_neg]
apply nonnegg_neg_pos.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val]
apply nonnegg_pos_neg.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_mul_lem {x y : ℕ} {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ * a) := by
have : (⟨x, y⟩ * a : ℤ√d) = (x : ℤ√d) * a + sqrtd * ((y : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [decompose, right_distrib, mul_assoc, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [this]
exact (nonneg_smul ha).add (nonneg_muld <| nonneg_smul ha)
theorem nonneg_mul {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a * b) :=
match a, b, nonneg_cases ha, nonneg_cases hb, ha, hb with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _, _ => trivial
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_mul.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.right.left (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2
(sqLe_mul.right.right.right (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
protected theorem mul_nonneg (a b : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b := by
simp_rw [← nonneg_iff_zero_le]
exact nonneg_mul
theorem not_sqLe_succ (c d y) (h : 0 < c) : ¬SqLe (y + 1) c 0 d :=
not_le_of_gt <| mul_pos (mul_pos h <| Nat.succ_pos _) <| Nat.succ_pos _
-- Porting note: renamed field and added theorem to make `x` explicit
/-- A nonsquare is a natural number that is not equal to the square of an
integer. This is implemented as a typeclass because it's a necessary condition
for much of the Pell equation theory. -/
class Nonsquare (x : ℕ) : Prop where
ns' : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n
theorem Nonsquare.ns (x : ℕ) [Nonsquare x] : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n := ns'
variable [dnsq : Nonsquare d]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) <| Ne.symm <| Nonsquare.ns d 0
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero {x y} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
let g := x.gcd y
Or.elim g.eq_zero_or_pos
(fun H => ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H, Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H⟩) fun gpos =>
False.elim <| by
let ⟨m, n, co, (hx : x = m * g), (hy : y = n * g)⟩ := Nat.exists_coprime _ _
rw [hx, hy] at h
have : m * m = d * (n * n) := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_pos gpos gpos).ne' ?_
-- Porting note: was `simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using h`
calc
g * g * (m * m)
_ = m * g * (m * g) := by ring
_ = d * (n * g) * (n * g) := h
_ = g * g * (d * (n * n)) := by ring
have co2 :=
let co1 := co.mul_right co
co1.mul co1
exact
Nonsquare.ns d m
(Nat.dvd_antisymm (by rw [this]; apply dvd_mul_right) <|
co2.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <| by simp [this])
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero_z {x y : ℤ} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natCast_mul, ← mul_assoc] at h
exact
let ⟨h1, h2⟩ := divides_sq_eq_zero (Int.ofNat.inj h)
⟨Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h1, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h2⟩
theorem not_divides_sq (x y) : (x + 1) * (x + 1) ≠ d * (y + 1) * (y + 1) := fun e => by
have t := (divides_sq_eq_zero e).left
contradiction
open Int in
theorem nonneg_antisymm : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → Nonneg (-a) → a = 0
| ⟨0, 0⟩, _, _ => rfl
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, xy, _ => False.elim xy
| ⟨(_ + 1 : Nat), (_ + 1 : Nat)⟩, _, yx => False.elim yx
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩, xy, _ => absurd xy (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ (by decide))
| ⟨(_ + 1 : Nat), 0⟩, _, yx => absurd yx (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ (by decide))
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩, xy, _ => absurd xy (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨0, (_ + 1 : Nat)⟩, _, yx => absurd yx (not_sqLe_succ _ _ _ d_pos)
| ⟨(x + 1 : Nat), -[y+1]⟩, (xy : SqLe _ _ _ _), (yx : SqLe _ _ _ _) => by
let t := le_antisymm yx xy
rw [one_mul] at t
exact absurd t (not_divides_sq _ _)
| ⟨-[x+1], (y + 1 : Nat)⟩, (xy : SqLe _ _ _ _), (yx : SqLe _ _ _ _) => by
let t := le_antisymm xy yx
rw [one_mul] at t
exact absurd t (not_divides_sq _ _)
theorem le_antisymm {a b : ℤ√d} (ab : a ≤ b) (ba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| nonneg_antisymm ba (by rwa [neg_sub])
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.preorder with
le_antisymm := fun _ _ => Zsqrtd.le_antisymm
le_total := Zsqrtd.le_total
toDecidableLE := Zsqrtd.decidableLE
toDecidableEq := inferInstance }
protected theorem eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : ℤ√d}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
| ⟨x, y⟩, ⟨z, w⟩, h => by
injection h with h1 h2
have h1 : x * z = -(d * y * w) := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left h1
have h2 : x * w = -(y * z) := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left h2
have fin : x * x = d * y * y → (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = 0 := fun e =>
match x, y, divides_sq_eq_zero_z e with
| _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
exact
if z0 : z = 0 then
if w0 : w = 0 then
Or.inr
(match z, w, z0, w0 with
| _, _, rfl, rfl => rfl)
else
Or.inl <|
fin <|
mul_right_cancel₀ w0 <|
calc
x * x * w = -y * (x * z) := by simp [h2, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
_ = d * y * y * w := by simp [h1, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
else
Or.inl <|
fin <|
mul_right_cancel₀ z0 <|
calc
x * x * z = d * -y * (x * w) := by simp [h1, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
_ = d * y * y * z := by simp [h2, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
instance : NoZeroDivisors (ℤ√d) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := Zsqrtd.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
instance : IsDomain (ℤ√d) :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
protected theorem mul_pos (a b : ℤ√d) (a0 : 0 < a) (b0 : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := fun ab =>
Or.elim
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
(le_antisymm ab (Zsqrtd.mul_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt a0) (le_of_lt b0))))
(fun e => ne_of_gt a0 e) fun e => ne_of_gt b0 e
instance : ZeroLEOneClass (ℤ√d) :=
{ zero_le_one := by trivial }
instance : IsOrderedAddMonoid (ℤ√d) :=
{ add_le_add_left := Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left }
instance : IsStrictOrderedRing (ℤ√d) :=
.of_mul_pos Zsqrtd.mul_pos
end
theorem norm_eq_zero {d : ℤ} (h_nonsquare : ∀ n : ℤ, d ≠ n * n) (a : ℤ√d) : norm a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun ha => Zsqrtd.ext_iff.mpr ?_, fun h => by rw [h, norm_zero]⟩
dsimp only [norm] at ha
rw [sub_eq_zero] at ha
by_cases h : 0 ≤ d
· obtain ⟨d', rfl⟩ := Int.eq_ofNat_of_zero_le h
haveI : Nonsquare d' := ⟨fun n h => h_nonsquare n <| mod_cast h⟩
exact divides_sq_eq_zero_z ha
· push_neg at h
suffices a.re * a.re = 0 by
rw [eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero this] at ha ⊢
simpa only [true_and, or_self_right, zero_re, zero_im, eq_self_iff_true, zero_eq_mul,
mul_zero, mul_eq_zero, h.ne, false_or, or_self_iff] using ha
apply _root_.le_antisymm _ (mul_self_nonneg _)
rw [ha, mul_assoc]
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg h.le (mul_self_nonneg _)
variable {R : Type}
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext [NonAssocRing R] {d : ℤ} (f g : ℤ√d →+* R) (h : f sqrtd = g sqrtd) : f = g := by
ext ⟨x_re, x_im⟩
simp [decompose, h]
variable [CommRing R]
/-- The unique `RingHom` from `ℤ√d` to a ring `R`, constructed by replacing `√d` with the provided
root. Conversely, this associates to every mapping `ℤ√d →+* R` a value of `√d` in `R`. -/
@[simps]
def lift {d : ℤ} : { r : R // r * r = ↑d } ≃ (ℤ√d →+* R) where
toFun r :=
{ toFun := fun a => a.1 + a.2 * (r : R)
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := fun a b => by
simp only [add_re, Int.cast_add, add_im]
ring
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun a b => by
have :
(a.re + a.im * r : R) * (b.re + b.im * r) =
a.re * b.re + (a.re * b.im + a.im * b.re) * r + a.im * b.im * (r * r) := by
ring
simp only [mul_re, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, mul_im, this, r.prop]
ring }
invFun f := ⟨f sqrtd, by rw [← f.map_mul, dmuld, map_intCast]⟩
left_inv r := by simp
right_inv f := by
ext
simp
/-- `lift r` is injective if `d` is non-square, and R has characteristic zero (that is, the map from
`ℤ` into `R` is injective). -/
theorem lift_injective [CharZero R] {d : ℤ} (r : { r : R // r * r = ↑d })
(hd : ∀ n : ℤ, d ≠ n * n) : Function.Injective (lift r) :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero (lift r)).mpr fun a ha => by
have h_inj : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℤ → R) := Int.cast_injective
suffices lift r a.norm = 0 by
simp only [intCast_re, add_zero, lift_apply_apply, intCast_im, Int.cast_zero,
zero_mul] at this
rwa [← Int.cast_zero, h_inj.eq_iff, norm_eq_zero hd] at this
rw [norm_eq_mul_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ha, zero_mul]
/-- An element of `ℤ√d` has norm equal to `1` if and only if it is contained in the submonoid
of unitary elements. -/
theorem norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} : a.norm = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
rw [unitary.mem_iff_self_mul_star, ← norm_eq_mul_conj]
norm_cast
/-- The kernel of the norm map on `ℤ√d` equals the submonoid of unitary elements. -/
theorem mker_norm_eq_unitary {d : ℤ} : MonoidHom.mker (@normMonoidHom d) = unitary (ℤ√d) :=
Submonoid.ext fun _ => norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary
end Zsqrtd
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 1,067 | 1,069 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Triangles
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and angles
in (possibly degenerate) triangles in real inner product spaces and
Euclidean affine spaces. More specialized results, and results
developed for simplices in general rather than just for triangles, are
in separate files. Definitions and results that make sense in more
general affine spaces rather than just in the Euclidean case go under
`LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace`.
## Implementation notes
Results in this file are generally given in a form with only those
non-degeneracy conditions needed for the particular result, rather
than requiring affine independence of the points of a triangle
unnecessarily.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_cosines
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pons_asinorum
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_angles_of_a_triangle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped CharZero Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on triangles in real inner product spaces
This section develops some results on (possibly degenerate) triangles
in real inner product spaces, where those definitions and results can
most conveniently be developed in terms of vectors and then used to
deduce corresponding results for Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
/-- **Law of cosines** (cosine rule), vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle (x y : V) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - 2 * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.cos (angle x y) := by
rw [show 2 * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.cos (angle x y) = 2 * (Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) by ring,
cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_sub_sub_self,
sub_add_eq_add_sub]
/-- **Pons asinorum**, vector angle form. -/
theorem angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
angle x (x - y) = angle y (y - x) := by
refine Real.injOn_cos ⟨angle_nonneg _ _, angle_le_pi _ _⟩ ⟨angle_nonneg _ _, angle_le_pi _ _⟩ ?_
rw [cos_angle, cos_angle, h, ← neg_sub, norm_neg, neg_sub, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, h, real_inner_comm x y]
/-- **Converse of pons asinorum**, vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_eq_of_angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_angle_ne_pi {x y : V}
(h : angle x (x - y) = angle y (y - x)) (hpi : angle x y ≠ π) : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
replace h := Real.arccos_injOn (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x (x - y)))
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one y (y - x))) h
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy]
· rw [← norm_neg (y - x), neg_sub, mul_comm, mul_comm ‖y‖, div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at h
replace h :=
mul_right_cancel₀ (inv_ne_zero fun hz => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 hz))) h
rw [inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib,
mul_self_mul_inv, mul_self_mul_inv, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub, ← mul_sub_left_distrib] at h
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0, norm_zero, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, zero_sub, neg_eq_zero] at h
rw [hx0, norm_zero, h]
· by_cases hy0 : y = 0
· rw [hy0, norm_zero, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, sub_zero] at h
rw [hy0, norm_zero, h]
· rw [inv_sub_inv (fun hz => hx0 (norm_eq_zero.1 hz)) fun hz => hy0 (norm_eq_zero.1 hz), ←
neg_sub, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, ← mul_neg_one] at h
symm
by_contra hyx
replace h := (mul_left_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hyx) h).symm
rw [real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, ← angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
exact hpi h
/-- The cosine of the sum of two angles in a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem cos_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_neg_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.cos (angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = -Real.cos (angle x y) := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, angle_self hy]
simp
· rw [Real.cos_add, cos_angle, cos_angle, cos_angle]
have hxn : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hx (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hyn : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hy (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hxyn : ‖x - y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 h))
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
have H1 :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ =
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * (‖x‖ * ‖x - y‖) *
(Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * (‖y‖ * ‖x - y‖)) := by
ring
have H2 :
⟪x, x⟫ * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, y⟫)) - (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
have H3 :
⟪y, y⟫ * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, x⟫)) - (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
rw [mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib,
H1, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, norm_sub_rev x y, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm,
norm_sub_rev y x, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right,
inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, H2, H3,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (sub_nonneg_of_le (real_inner_mul_inner_self_le x y)),
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp [hxn, hyn, hxyn]`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [sub_div', div_div, mul_div_assoc',
div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_sub', neg_div', neg_sub, eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
ring
/-- The sine of the sum of two angles in a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem sin_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_sin_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = Real.sin (angle x y) := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, angle_self hy]
simp
· rw [Real.sin_add, cos_angle, cos_angle]
have hxn : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hx (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hyn : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hy (norm_eq_zero.1 h)
have hxyn : ‖x - y‖ ≠ 0 := fun h => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 h))
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
apply mul_right_cancel₀ hxyn
have H1 :
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * (⟪y, y - x⟫ / (‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖)) * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖x - y‖ =
Real.sin (angle x (x - y)) * (‖x‖ * ‖x - y‖) * (⟪y, y - x⟫ / (‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖)) * ‖y‖ := by
ring
have H2 :
⟪x, x - y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y - x‖) * Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖ =
⟪x, x - y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y - x‖) * (Real.sin (angle y (y - x)) * (‖y‖ * ‖y - x‖)) * ‖x‖ := by
ring
have H3 :
⟪x, x⟫ * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, y⟫)) - (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
have H4 :
⟪y, y⟫ * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - (⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, x⟫)) - (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) * (⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫) =
⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
ring
rw [right_distrib, right_distrib, right_distrib, right_distrib, H1, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm,
norm_sub_rev x y, H2, sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, norm_sub_rev y x,
mul_assoc (Real.sin (angle x y)), sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_left,
inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, H3,
H4, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp [hxn, hyn, hxyn]`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [mul_div_assoc', div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_div,
sub_div', Real.sqrt_div', Real.sqrt_mul_self, add_div', div_add', eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
ring
/-- The cosine of the sum of the angles of a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem cos_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.cos (angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = -1 := by
rw [add_assoc, Real.cos_add, cos_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_neg_cos_angle hx hy,
sin_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_sin_angle hx hy, mul_neg, ← neg_add', add_comm, ← sq, ← sq,
Real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq]
/-- The sine of the sum of the angles of a possibly degenerate
triangle (where two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem sin_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.sin (angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x)) = 0 := by
rw [add_assoc, Real.sin_add, cos_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_neg_cos_angle hx hy,
sin_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_rev_eq_sin_angle hx hy]
ring
/-- The sum of the angles of a possibly degenerate triangle (where the
two given sides are nonzero), vector angle form. -/
theorem angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x) = π := by
have hcos := cos_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_neg_one hx hy
have hsin := sin_angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_zero hx hy
rw [Real.sin_eq_zero_iff] at hsin
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hsin
symm at hn
have h0 : 0 ≤ angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x) :=
add_nonneg (add_nonneg (angle_nonneg _ _) (angle_nonneg _ _)) (angle_nonneg _ _)
have h3lt : angle x y + angle x (x - y) + angle y (y - x) < π + π + π := by
by_contra hnlt
have hxy : angle x y = π := by
by_contra hxy
exact hnlt (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_ne
(angle_le_pi _ _) hxy) (angle_le_pi _ _)) (angle_le_pi _ _))
rw [hxy] at hnlt
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at hxy
rcases hxy with ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hxr⟩⟩⟩
rw [hxr, ← one_smul ℝ x, ← mul_smul, mul_one, ← sub_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_add_neg,
angle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (add_pos zero_lt_one (neg_pos_of_neg hr)), angle_self hx,
add_zero] at hnlt
apply hnlt
rw [add_assoc]
exact add_lt_add_left (lt_of_le_of_lt (angle_le_pi _ _) (lt_add_of_pos_right π Real.pi_pos)) _
have hn0 : 0 ≤ n := by
rw [hn, mul_nonneg_iff_left_nonneg_of_pos Real.pi_pos] at h0
norm_cast at h0
have hn3 : n < 3 := by
rw [hn, show π + π + π = 3 * π by ring] at h3lt
replace h3lt := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right h3lt (le_of_lt Real.pi_pos)
norm_cast at h3lt
interval_cases n
· simp [hn] at hcos
· norm_num [hn]
· simp [hn] at hcos
end InnerProductGeometry
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on triangles in Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some geometrical definitions and results on
(possibly degenerate) triangles in Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
open InnerProductGeometry
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- **Law of cosines** (cosine rule), angle-at-point form. -/
theorem dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_sub_two_mul_dist_mul_dist_mul_cos_angle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) :
dist p₁ p₃ * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ * dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ * dist p₃ p₂ -
2 * dist p₁ p₂ * dist p₃ p₂ * Real.cos (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₂]
unfold angle
convert norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle
(p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : V) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂ : V)
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p₃ p₂).symm
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p₃ p₂).symm
alias law_cos := dist_sq_eq_dist_sq_add_dist_sq_sub_two_mul_dist_mul_dist_mul_cos_angle
/-- **Isosceles Triangle Theorem**: Pons asinorum, angle-at-point form. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃] at h
unfold angle
convert angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁).symm
· exact (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁).symm
/-- Converse of pons asinorum, angle-at-point form. -/
theorem dist_eq_of_angle_eq_angle_of_angle_ne_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₃ p₂)
(hpi : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ ≠ π) : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃ := by
unfold angle at h hpi
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₃]
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at hpi
rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁] at h
exact norm_eq_of_angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_angle_ne_pi h hpi
/-- The **sum of the angles of a triangle** (possibly degenerate, where the
given vertex is distinct from the others), angle-at-point. -/
theorem angle_add_angle_add_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h2 : p₂ ≠ p₁) (h3 : p₃ ≠ p₁) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ + ∠ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π := by
rw [add_assoc, add_comm, add_comm (∠ p₂ p₃ p₁), angle_comm p₂ p₃ p₁]
unfold angle
| rw [← angle_neg_neg (p₁ -ᵥ p₃), ← angle_neg_neg (p₁ -ᵥ p₂), neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₂ p₃ p₁]
exact angle_add_angle_sub_add_angle_sub_eq_pi (fun he => h3 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
h2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- The **sum of the angles of a triangle** (possibly degenerate, where the triangle is a line),
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Triangle.lean | 289 | 295 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.W.Basic
/-!
# Polynomial functors
This file defines polynomial functors and the W-type construction as a
polynomial functor. (For the M-type construction, see
pfunctor/M.lean.)
-/
-- "W", "Idx"
universe u v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- A polynomial functor `P` is given by a type `A` and a family `B` of types over `A`. `P` maps
any type `α` to a new type `P α`, which is defined as the sigma type `Σ x, P.B x → α`.
An element of `P α` is a pair `⟨a, f⟩`, where `a` is an element of a type `A` and
`f : B a → α`. Think of `a` as the shape of the object and `f` as an index to the relevant
elements of `α`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
structure PFunctor where
/-- The head type -/
A : Type u
/-- The child family of types -/
B : A → Type u
namespace PFunctor
instance : Inhabited PFunctor :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
variable (P : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type v₁} {β : Type v₂} {γ : Type v₃}
/-- Applying `P` to an object of `Type` -/
@[coe]
def Obj (α : Type v) :=
Σ x : P.A, P.B x → α
instance : CoeFun PFunctor.{u} (fun _ => Type v → Type (max u v)) where
coe := Obj
/-- Applying `P` to a morphism of `Type` -/
def map (f : α → β) : P α → P β :=
fun ⟨a, g⟩ => ⟨a, f ∘ g⟩
instance Obj.inhabited [Inhabited P.A] [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (P α) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
instance : Functor.{v, max u v} P.Obj where map := @map P
/-- We prefer `PFunctor.map` to `Functor.map` because it is universe-polymorphic. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β : Type v} (f : α → β) (x : P α) : f <$> x = P.map f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq (f : α → β) (a : P.A) (g : P.B a → α) :
P.map f ⟨a, g⟩ = ⟨a, f ∘ g⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem id_map : ∀ x : P α, P.map id x = x := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
∀ x : P α, P.map g (P.map f x) = P.map (g ∘ f) x := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
instance : LawfulFunctor.{v, max u v} P.Obj where
map_const := rfl
id_map x := P.id_map x
comp_map f g x := P.map_map f g x |>.symm
/-- re-export existing definition of W-types and
adapt it to a packaged definition of polynomial functor -/
def W :=
WType P.B
/- inhabitants of W types is awkward to encode as an instance
assumption because there needs to be a value `a : P.A`
such that `P.B a` is empty to yield a finite tree -/
variable {P}
/-- root element of a W tree -/
def W.head : W P → P.A
| ⟨a, _f⟩ => a
/-- children of the root of a W tree -/
def W.children : ∀ x : W P, P.B (W.head x) → W P
| ⟨_a, f⟩ => f
/-- destructor for W-types -/
def W.dest : W P → P (W P)
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
/-- constructor for W-types -/
def W.mk : P (W P) → W P
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
@[simp]
theorem W.dest_mk (p : P (W P)) : W.dest (W.mk p) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[simp]
theorem W.mk_dest (p : W P) : W.mk (W.dest p) = p := by cases p; rfl
variable (P)
/-- `Idx` identifies a location inside the application of a pfunctor.
For `F : PFunctor`, `x : F α` and `i : F.Idx`, `i` can designate
one part of `x` or is invalid, if `i.1 ≠ x.1` -/
def Idx :=
Σ x : P.A, P.B x
instance Idx.inhabited [Inhabited P.A] [Inhabited (P.B default)] : Inhabited P.Idx :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
variable {P}
/-- `x.iget i` takes the component of `x` designated by `i` if any is or returns
a default value -/
def Obj.iget [DecidableEq P.A] {α} [Inhabited α] (x : P α) (i : P.Idx) : α :=
if h : i.1 = x.1 then x.2 (cast (congr_arg _ h) i.2) else default
@[simp]
theorem fst_map (x : P α) (f : α → β) : (P.map f x).1 = x.1 := by cases x; rfl
@[simp]
theorem iget_map [DecidableEq P.A] [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] (x : P α)
(f : α → β) (i : P.Idx) (h : i.1 = x.1) : (P.map f x).iget i = f (x.iget i) := by
simp only [Obj.iget, fst_map, *, dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true]
cases x
rfl
end PFunctor
/-
Composition of polynomial functors.
-/
namespace PFunctor
/-- functor composition for polynomial functors -/
def comp (P₂ P₁ : PFunctor.{u}) : PFunctor.{u} :=
⟨Σ a₂ : P₂.1, P₂.2 a₂ → P₁.1, fun a₂a₁ => Σ u : P₂.2 a₂a₁.1, P₁.2 (a₂a₁.2 u)⟩
/-- constructor for composition -/
def comp.mk (P₂ P₁ : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type} (x : P₂ (P₁ α)) : comp P₂ P₁ α :=
⟨⟨x.1, Sigma.fst ∘ x.2⟩, fun a₂a₁ => (x.2 a₂a₁.1).2 a₂a₁.2⟩
/-- destructor for composition -/
def comp.get (P₂ P₁ : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type} (x : comp P₂ P₁ α) : P₂ (P₁ α) :=
⟨x.1.1, fun a₂ => ⟨x.1.2 a₂, fun a₁ => x.2 ⟨a₂, a₁⟩⟩⟩
end PFunctor
/-
Lifting predicates and relations.
-/
namespace PFunctor
variable {P : PFunctor.{u}}
open Functor
theorem liftp_iff {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : P α) :
Liftp p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i, p (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases h : y with ⟨a, f⟩
refine ⟨a, fun i => (f i).val, ?_, fun i => (f i).property⟩
rw [← hy, h, map_eq_map, PFunctor.map_eq]
congr
rintro ⟨a, f, xeq, pf⟩
use ⟨a, fun i => ⟨f i, pf i⟩⟩
rw [xeq]; rfl
theorem liftp_iff' {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (a : P.A) (f : P.B a → α) :
@Liftp.{u} P.Obj _ α p ⟨a, f⟩ ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by
simp only [liftp_iff, Sigma.mk.inj_iff]; constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨a', f', heq, h'⟩
cases heq
assumption
repeat' first |constructor|assumption
theorem liftr_iff {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (x y : P α) :
Liftr r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i, r (f₀ i) (f₁ i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩
rcases h : u with ⟨a, f⟩
use a, fun i => (f i).val.fst, fun i => (f i).val.snd
constructor
· rw [← xeq, h]
rfl
constructor
· rw [← yeq, h]
rfl
intro i
exact (f i).property
rintro ⟨a, f₀, f₁, xeq, yeq, h⟩
use ⟨a, fun i => ⟨(f₀ i, f₁ i), h i⟩⟩
constructor
· rw [xeq]
rfl
rw [yeq]; rfl
open Set
theorem supp_eq {α : Type u} (a : P.A) (f : P.B a → α) :
@supp.{u} P.Obj _ α (⟨a, f⟩ : P α) = f '' univ := by
ext x; simp only [supp, image_univ, mem_range, mem_setOf_eq]
constructor <;> intro h
· apply @h fun x => ∃ y : P.B a, f y = x
rw [liftp_iff']
intro
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
· simp only [liftp_iff']
cases h
subst x
tauto
end PFunctor
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/Basic.lean | 244 | 255 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
|
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 120 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Projective
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.ExtraDegeneracy
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Ext
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Rep
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Free
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso.Balanced
/-!
# The structure of the `k[G]`-module `k[Gⁿ]`
This file contains facts about an important `k[G]`-module structure on `k[Gⁿ]`, where `k` is a
commutative ring and `G` is a group. The module structure arises from the representation
`G →* End(k[Gⁿ])` induced by the diagonal action of `G` on `Gⁿ.`
In particular, we define an isomorphism of `k`-linear `G`-representations between `k[Gⁿ⁺¹]` and
`k[G] ⊗ₖ k[Gⁿ]` (on which `G` acts by `ρ(g₁)(g₂ ⊗ x) = (g₁ * g₂) ⊗ x`).
This allows us to define a `k[G]`-basis on `k[Gⁿ⁺¹]`, by mapping the natural `k[G]`-basis of
`k[G] ⊗ₖ k[Gⁿ]` along the isomorphism.
We then define the standard resolution of `k` as a trivial representation, by
taking the alternating face map complex associated to an appropriate simplicial `k`-linear
`G`-representation. This simplicial object is the `Rep.linearization` of the simplicial `G`-set
given by the universal cover of the classifying space of `G`, `EG`. We prove this simplicial
`G`-set `EG` is isomorphic to the Čech nerve of the natural arrow of `G`-sets `G ⟶ {pt}`.
We then use this isomorphism to deduce that as a complex of `k`-modules, the standard resolution
of `k` as a trivial `G`-representation is homotopy equivalent to the complex with `k` at 0 and 0
elsewhere.
Putting this material together allows us to define `groupCohomology.projectiveResolution`, the
standard projective resolution of `k` as a trivial `k`-linear `G`-representation.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.resolution.actionDiagonalSucc`
* `groupCohomology.resolution.diagonalSucc`
* `groupCohomology.resolution.ofMulActionBasis`
* `classifyingSpaceUniversalCover`
* `groupCohomology.resolution.forget₂ToModuleCatHomotopyEquiv`
* `groupCohomology.projectiveResolution`
## Implementation notes
We express `k[G]`-module structures on a module `k`-module `V` using the `Representation`
definition. We avoid using instances `Module (G →₀ k) V` so that we do not run into possible
scalar action diamonds.
We also use the category theory library to bundle the type `k[Gⁿ]` - or more generally `k[H]` when
`H` has `G`-action - and the representation together, as a term of type `Rep k G`, and call it
`Rep.ofMulAction k G H.` This enables us to express the fact that certain maps are
`G`-equivariant by constructing morphisms in the category `Rep k G`, i.e., representations of `G`
over `k`.
-/
/- Porting note: most altered proofs in this file involved changing `simp` to `rw` or `erw`, so
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026 and
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5164 are relevant. -/
suppress_compilation
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] {n : ℕ}
open CategoryTheory Finsupp
local notation "Gⁿ" => Fin n → G
set_option quotPrecheck false
local notation "Gⁿ⁺¹" => Fin (n + 1) → G
namespace groupCohomology.resolution
open Finsupp hiding lift
open MonoidalCategory
open Fin (partialProd)
section Basis
variable (k G n) [Group G]
section Action
open Action
/-- An isomorphism of `G`-sets `Gⁿ⁺¹ ≅ G × Gⁿ`, where `G` acts by left multiplication on `Gⁿ⁺¹` and
`G` but trivially on `Gⁿ`. The map sends `(g₀, ..., gₙ) ↦ (g₀, (g₀⁻¹g₁, g₁⁻¹g₂, ..., gₙ₋₁⁻¹gₙ))`,
and the inverse is `(g₀, (g₁, ..., gₙ)) ↦ (g₀, g₀g₁, g₀g₁g₂, ..., g₀g₁...gₙ).` -/
def actionDiagonalSucc (G : Type u) [Group G] :
∀ n : ℕ, diagonal G (n + 1) ≅ leftRegular G ⊗ Action.mk (Fin n → G) 1
| 0 =>
diagonalOneIsoLeftRegular G ≪≫
(ρ_ _).symm ≪≫ tensorIso (Iso.refl _) (tensorUnitIso (Equiv.ofUnique PUnit _).toIso)
| n + 1 =>
diagonalSucc _ _ ≪≫
tensorIso (Iso.refl _) (actionDiagonalSucc G n) ≪≫
leftRegularTensorIso _ _ ≪≫
tensorIso (Iso.refl _)
(mkIso (Fin.insertNthEquiv (fun _ => G) 0).toIso fun _ => rfl)
theorem actionDiagonalSucc_hom_apply {G : Type u} [Group G] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → G) :
(actionDiagonalSucc G n).hom.hom f = (f 0, fun i => (f (Fin.castSucc i))⁻¹ * f i.succ) := by
induction n with
| zero => exact Prod.ext rfl (funext fun x => Fin.elim0 x)
| succ n hn =>
refine Prod.ext rfl (funext fun x => ?_)
/- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11039): broken proof was
· dsimp only [actionDiagonalSucc]
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, comp_hom, types_comp_apply, diagonalSucc_hom_hom,
leftRegularTensorIso_hom_hom, tensorIso_hom, mkIso_hom_hom, Equiv.toIso_hom,
Action.tensorHom, Equiv.piFinSuccAbove_symm_apply, tensor_apply, types_id_apply,
tensor_rho, MonoidHom.one_apply, End.one_def, hn fun j : Fin (n + 1) => f j.succ,
Fin.insertNth_zero']
refine' Fin.cases (Fin.cons_zero _ _) (fun i => _) x
· simp only [Fin.cons_succ, mul_left_inj, inv_inj, Fin.castSucc_fin_succ] -/
dsimp [actionDiagonalSucc]
erw [hn (fun (j : Fin (n + 1)) => f j.succ)]
exact Fin.cases rfl (fun i => rfl) x
theorem actionDiagonalSucc_inv_apply {G : Type u} [Group G] {n : ℕ} (g : G) (f : Fin n → G) :
(actionDiagonalSucc G n).inv.hom (g, f) = (g • Fin.partialProd f : Fin (n + 1) → G) := by
revert g
induction n with
| zero =>
intro g
funext (x : Fin 1)
simp only [Subsingleton.elim x 0, Pi.smul_apply, Fin.partialProd_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rfl
| succ n hn =>
intro g
/- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11039): broken proof was
ext
dsimp only [actionDiagonalSucc]
simp only [Iso.trans_inv, comp_hom, hn, diagonalSucc_inv_hom, types_comp_apply, tensorIso_inv,
Iso.refl_inv, Action.tensorHom, id_hom, tensor_apply, types_id_apply,
leftRegularTensorIso_inv_hom, tensor_ρ, leftRegular_ρ_apply, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
refine' Fin.cases _ _ x
· simp only [Fin.cons_zero, Fin.partialProd_zero, mul_one]
· intro i
simpa only [Fin.cons_succ, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Fin.partialProd_succ', mul_assoc] -/
funext x
dsimp [actionDiagonalSucc]
erw [hn, Fin.consEquiv_apply]
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) x
· simp only [Fin.insertNth_zero, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.partialProd_zero, mul_one]
· simp only [Fin.cons_succ, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Fin.partialProd_succ', ← mul_assoc]
rfl
end Action
section Rep
open Rep
/-- An isomorphism of `k`-linear representations of `G` from `k[Gⁿ⁺¹]` to `k[G] ⊗ₖ k[Gⁿ]` (on
which `G` acts by `ρ(g₁)(g₂ ⊗ x) = (g₁ * g₂) ⊗ x`) sending `(g₀, ..., gₙ)` to
`g₀ ⊗ (g₀⁻¹g₁, g₁⁻¹g₂, ..., gₙ₋₁⁻¹gₙ)`. The inverse sends `g₀ ⊗ (g₁, ..., gₙ)` to
`(g₀, g₀g₁, ..., g₀g₁...gₙ)`. -/
def diagonalSucc (n : ℕ) :
diagonal k G (n + 1) ≅ leftRegular k G ⊗ trivial k G ((Fin n → G) →₀ k) :=
(linearization k G).mapIso (actionDiagonalSucc G n) ≪≫
(Functor.Monoidal.μIso (linearization k G) _ _).symm ≪≫
tensorIso (Iso.refl _) (linearizationTrivialIso k G (Fin n → G))
variable {k G n}
theorem diagonalSucc_hom_single (f : Gⁿ⁺¹) (a : k) :
(diagonalSucc k G n).hom.hom (single f a) =
single (f 0) 1 ⊗ₜ single (fun i => (f (Fin.castSucc i))⁻¹ * f i.succ) a := by
dsimp [diagonalSucc]
erw [lmapDomain_apply, mapDomain_single, LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, finsuppTensorFinsupp',
LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, lcongr_symm, Equiv.refl_symm]
erw [lcongr_single]
rw [TensorProduct.lid_symm_apply, actionDiagonalSucc_hom_apply, finsuppTensorFinsupp_symm_single]
rfl
theorem diagonalSucc_inv_single_single (g : G) (f : Gⁿ) (a b : k) :
(diagonalSucc k G n).inv.hom (Finsupp.single g a ⊗ₜ Finsupp.single f b) =
single (g • partialProd f) (a * b) := by
/- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11039): broken proof was
dsimp only [diagonalSucc]
simp only [Iso.trans_inv, Iso.symm_inv, Iso.refl_inv, tensorIso_inv, Action.tensorHom,
Action.comp_hom, ModuleCat.comp_def, LinearMap.comp_apply, asIso_hom, Functor.mapIso_inv,
ModuleCat.MonoidalCategory.hom_apply, linearizationTrivialIso_inv_hom_apply,
linearization_μ_hom, Action.id_hom ((linearization k G).obj _), actionDiagonalSucc_inv_apply,
ModuleCat.id_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap,
finsuppTensorFinsupp'_single_tmul_single k (Action.leftRegular G).V,
linearization_map_hom_single (actionDiagonalSucc G n).inv (g, f) (a * b)] -/
change mapDomain (actionDiagonalSucc G n).inv.hom
(lcongr (Equiv.refl (G × (Fin n → G))) (TensorProduct.lid k k)
(finsuppTensorFinsupp k k k k G (Fin n → G) (single g a ⊗ₜ[k] single f b)))
= single (g • partialProd f) (a * b)
rw [finsuppTensorFinsupp_single, lcongr_single, mapDomain_single, Equiv.refl_apply,
actionDiagonalSucc_inv_apply]
rfl
theorem diagonalSucc_inv_single_left (g : G) (f : Gⁿ →₀ k) (r : k) :
(diagonalSucc k G n).inv.hom (Finsupp.single g r ⊗ₜ f) =
Finsupp.lift (Gⁿ⁺¹ →₀ k) k Gⁿ (fun f => single (g • partialProd f) r) f := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· simp only [TensorProduct.tmul_zero, map_zero]
· intro a b x _ _ hx
-- `simp` doesn't pick up on `diagonalSucc_inv_single_single` unless it has parentheses.
simp only [lift_apply, smul_single', mul_one, TensorProduct.tmul_add, map_add,
(diagonalSucc_inv_single_single), hx, Finsupp.sum_single_index, mul_comm b,
zero_mul, single_zero]
theorem diagonalSucc_inv_single_right (g : G →₀ k) (f : Gⁿ) (r : k) :
(diagonalSucc k G n).inv.hom (g ⊗ₜ Finsupp.single f r) =
Finsupp.lift _ k G (fun a => single (a • partialProd f) r) g := by
refine g.induction ?_ ?_
· simp only [TensorProduct.zero_tmul, map_zero]
· intro a b x _ _ hx
-- `simp` doesn't pick up on `diagonalSucc_inv_single_single` unless it has parentheses.
simp only [lift_apply, smul_single', map_add, hx, (diagonalSucc_inv_single_single),
TensorProduct.add_tmul, Finsupp.sum_single_index, zero_mul, single_zero]
end Rep
open scoped TensorProduct
open Representation
/-- The `k[G]`-linear isomorphism `k[G] ⊗ₖ k[Gⁿ] ≃ k[Gⁿ⁺¹]`, where the `k[G]`-module structure on
the lefthand side is `TensorProduct.leftModule`, whilst that of the righthand side comes from
`Representation.asModule`. Allows us to use `Algebra.TensorProduct.basis` to get a `k[G]`-basis
of the righthand side. -/
def ofMulActionBasisAux :
MonoidAlgebra k G ⊗[k] ((Fin n → G) →₀ k) ≃ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G]
(ofMulAction k G (Fin (n + 1) → G)).asModule :=
haveI e := (Rep.equivalenceModuleMonoidAlgebra.1.mapIso (diagonalSucc k G n).symm).toLinearEquiv
{ e with
map_smul' := fun r x => by
rw [RingHom.id_apply, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe, ← LinearEquiv.map_smul e]
congr 1
/- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11039): broken proof was
refine' x.induction_on _ (fun x y => _) fun y z hy hz => _
· simp only [smul_zero]
· simp only [TensorProduct.smul_tmul']
show (r * x) ⊗ₜ y = _
rw [← ofMulAction_self_smul_eq_mul, smul_tprod_one_asModule]
· rw [smul_add, hz, hy, smul_add] -/
show _ = Representation.asAlgebraHom (tensorObj (Rep.leftRegular k G)
(Rep.trivial k G ((Fin n → G) →₀ k))).ρ r _
refine x.induction_on ?_ (fun x y => ?_) fun y z hy hz => ?_
· rw [smul_zero, map_zero]
· rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, ← ofMulAction_self_smul_eq_mul]
exact (smul_tprod_one_asModule (Representation.ofMulAction k G G) r x y).symm
· rw [smul_add, hz, hy, map_add] }
/-- A `k[G]`-basis of `k[Gⁿ⁺¹]`, coming from the `k[G]`-linear isomorphism
`k[G] ⊗ₖ k[Gⁿ] ≃ k[Gⁿ⁺¹].` -/
def ofMulActionBasis :
Basis (Fin n → G) (MonoidAlgebra k G) (ofMulAction k G (Fin (n + 1) → G)).asModule :=
Basis.map
(Algebra.TensorProduct.basis (MonoidAlgebra k G)
(Finsupp.basisSingleOne : Basis (Fin n → G) k ((Fin n → G) →₀ k)))
(ofMulActionBasisAux k G n)
theorem ofMulAction_free :
Module.Free (MonoidAlgebra k G) (ofMulAction k G (Fin (n + 1) → G)).asModule :=
Module.Free.of_basis (ofMulActionBasis k G n)
end Basis
end groupCohomology.resolution
namespace Rep
variable (n) [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
open groupCohomology.resolution
/-- Given a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, the set of representation morphisms
`Hom(k[Gⁿ⁺¹], A)` is `k`-linearly isomorphic to the set of functions `Gⁿ → A`. -/
noncomputable def diagonalHomEquiv :
(Rep.diagonal k G (n + 1) ⟶ A) ≃ₗ[k] (Fin n → G) → A :=
Linear.homCongr k
((diagonalSucc k G n).trans ((Representation.ofMulAction k G G).repOfTprodIso 1))
(Iso.refl _) ≪≫ₗ
(Rep.MonoidalClosed.linearHomEquivComm _ _ _ ≪≫ₗ Rep.leftRegularHomEquiv _) ≪≫ₗ
(Finsupp.llift A k k (Fin n → G)).symm
variable {n A}
/-- Given a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `diagonalHomEquiv` is a `k`-linear isomorphism of
the set of representation morphisms `Hom(k[Gⁿ⁺¹], A)` with `Fun(Gⁿ, A)`. This lemma says that this
sends a morphism of representations `f : k[Gⁿ⁺¹] ⟶ A` to the function
`(g₁, ..., gₙ) ↦ f(1, g₁, g₁g₂, ..., g₁g₂...gₙ).` -/
theorem diagonalHomEquiv_apply (f : Rep.diagonal k G (n + 1) ⟶ A) (x : Fin n → G) :
diagonalHomEquiv n A f x = f.hom (Finsupp.single (Fin.partialProd x) 1) := by
/- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11039): broken proof was
unfold diagonalHomEquiv
simpa only [LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Rep.leftRegularHomEquiv_apply,
MonoidalClosed.linearHomEquivComm_hom, Finsupp.llift_symm_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
Linear.homCongr_apply, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.trans_inv, Action.comp_hom, ModuleCat.comp_def,
LinearMap.comp_apply, Representation.repOfTprodIso_inv_apply,
diagonalSucc_inv_single_single (1 : G) x, one_smul, one_mul] -/
change f.hom ((diagonalSucc k G n).inv.hom (Finsupp.single 1 1 ⊗ₜ[k] Finsupp.single x 1)) = _
rw [diagonalSucc_inv_single_single, one_smul, one_mul]
/-- Given a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `diagonalHomEquiv` is a `k`-linear isomorphism of
the set of representation morphisms `Hom(k[Gⁿ⁺¹], A)` with `Fun(Gⁿ, A)`. This lemma says that the
inverse map sends a function `f : Gⁿ → A` to the representation morphism sending
`(g₀, ... gₙ) ↦ ρ(g₀)(f(g₀⁻¹g₁, g₁⁻¹g₂, ..., gₙ₋₁⁻¹gₙ))`, where `ρ` is the representation attached
to `A`. -/
theorem diagonalHomEquiv_symm_apply (f : (Fin n → G) → A) (x : Fin (n + 1) → G) :
((diagonalHomEquiv n A).symm f).hom (Finsupp.single x 1) =
A.ρ (x 0) (f fun i : Fin n => (x (Fin.castSucc i))⁻¹ * x i.succ) := by
unfold diagonalHomEquiv
/- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11039): broken proof was
simp only [LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_symm, LinearEquiv.trans_apply,
Rep.leftRegularHomEquiv_symm_apply, Linear.homCongr_symm_apply, Action.comp_hom, Iso.refl_inv,
Category.comp_id, Rep.MonoidalClosed.linearHomEquivComm_symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
ModuleCat.comp_def, LinearMap.comp_apply, Representation.repOfTprodIso_apply,
diagonalSucc_hom_single x (1 : k), TensorProduct.uncurry_apply, Rep.leftRegularHom_hom,
Finsupp.lift_apply, ihom_obj_ρ_def, Rep.ihom_obj_ρ_apply, Finsupp.sum_single_index, zero_smul,
one_smul, Rep.of_ρ, Rep.Action_ρ_eq_ρ, Rep.trivial_def (x 0)⁻¹, Finsupp.llift_apply A k k] -/
simp only [LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_symm, LinearEquiv.trans_apply,
leftRegularHomEquiv_symm_apply, Linear.homCongr_symm_apply, Iso.trans_hom, Iso.refl_inv,
Category.comp_id, Action.comp_hom, MonoidalClosed.linearHomEquivComm_symm_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_comp, LinearMap.comp_apply]
rw [diagonalSucc_hom_single]
-- The prototype linter that checks if `erw` could be replaced with `rw` would time out
-- if it replaces the next `erw`s with `rw`s. So we focus down on the relevant part.
conv_lhs =>
erw [TensorProduct.uncurry_apply, Finsupp.lift_apply, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
· simp only [one_smul]
erw [Representation.linHom_apply]
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, MonoidHom.one_apply, Module.End.one_apply]
erw [Finsupp.llift_apply]
rw [Finsupp.lift_apply]
erw [Finsupp.sum_single_index]
· rw [one_smul]
· rw [zero_smul]
· rw [zero_smul]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for defining group cohomology, used to show that the isomorphism
`diagonalHomEquiv` commutes with the differentials in two complexes which compute
group cohomology. -/
theorem diagonalHomEquiv_symm_partialProd_succ (f : (Fin n → G) → A) (g : Fin (n + 1) → G)
(a : Fin (n + 1)) :
((diagonalHomEquiv n A).symm f).hom (Finsupp.single (Fin.partialProd g ∘ a.succ.succAbove) 1)
= f (Fin.contractNth a (· * ·) g) := by
simp only [diagonalHomEquiv_symm_apply, Function.comp_apply, Fin.succ_succAbove_zero,
Fin.partialProd_zero, map_one, Fin.succ_succAbove_succ, Module.End.one_apply,
Fin.partialProd_succ]
congr
ext
rw [← Fin.partialProd_succ, Fin.inv_partialProd_mul_eq_contractNth]
end Rep
| variable (G)
/-- The simplicial `G`-set sending `[n]` to `Gⁿ⁺¹` equipped with the diagonal action of `G`. -/
def classifyingSpaceUniversalCover [Monoid G] :
SimplicialObject (Action (Type u) G) where
obj n := Action.ofMulAction G (Fin (n.unop.len + 1) → G)
map f :=
{ hom := fun x => x ∘ f.unop.toOrderHom
comm := fun _ => rfl }
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
namespace classifyingSpaceUniversalCover
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable [Monoid G]
/-- When the category is `G`-Set, `cechNerveTerminalFrom` of `G` with the left regular action is
isomorphic to `EG`, the universal cover of the classifying space of `G` as a simplicial `G`-set. -/
def cechNerveTerminalFromIso :
cechNerveTerminalFrom (Action.ofMulAction G G) ≅ classifyingSpaceUniversalCover G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ => limit.isoLimitCone (Action.ofMulActionLimitCone _ _)) fun f => by
refine IsLimit.hom_ext (Action.ofMulActionLimitCone.{u, 0} G fun _ => G).2 fun j => ?_
dsimp only [cechNerveTerminalFrom, Pi.lift]
rw [Category.assoc, limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π, limit.lift_π, Category.assoc]
exact (limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π _ _).symm
/-- As a simplicial set, `cechNerveTerminalFrom` of a monoid `G` is isomorphic to the universal
cover of the classifying space of `G` as a simplicial set. -/
def cechNerveTerminalFromIsoCompForget :
cechNerveTerminalFrom G ≅ classifyingSpaceUniversalCover G ⋙ forget _ :=
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/Resolution.lean | 363 | 394 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Opposite
/-!
# Calculus of fractions
Following the definitions by [Gabriel and Zisman][gabriel-zisman-1967],
given a morphism property `W : MorphismProperty C` on a category `C`,
we introduce the class `W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions`. The main
result `Localization.exists_leftFraction` is that if `L : C ⥤ D`
is a localization functor for `W`, then for any morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` in `D`,
there exists an auxiliary object `Y' : C` and morphisms `g : X ⟶ Y'` and `s : Y ⟶ Y'`,
with `W s`, such that the given morphism is a sort of fraction `g / s`,
or more precisely of the form `L.map g ≫ (Localization.isoOfHom L W s hs).inv`.
We also show that the functor `L.mapArrow : Arrow C ⥤ Arrow D` is essentially surjective.
Similar results are obtained when `W` has a right calculus of fractions.
## References
* [P. Gabriel, M. Zisman, *Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory*][gabriel-zisman-1967]
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
open Category
namespace MorphismProperty
/-- A left fraction from `X : C` to `Y : C` for `W : MorphismProperty C` consists of the
datum of an object `Y' : C` and maps `f : X ⟶ Y'` and `s : Y ⟶ Y'` such that `W s`. -/
structure LeftFraction (W : MorphismProperty C) (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of a left fraction -/
{Y' : C}
/-- the numerator of a left fraction -/
f : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the denominator of a left fraction -/
s : Y ⟶ Y'
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
namespace LeftFraction
variable (W : MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C}
/-- The left fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
W.LeftFraction X Y := mk f (𝟙 Y) (W.id_mem Y)
variable {W}
/-- The left fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `s : Y ⟶ X` such that `W s`. -/
@[simps]
def ofInv (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) :
W.LeftFraction X Y := mk (𝟙 X) s hs
/-- If `φ : W.LeftFraction X Y` and `L` is a functor which inverts `W`, this is the
induced morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` -/
noncomputable def map (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y :=
have := hL _ φ.hs
L.map φ.f ≫ inv (L.map φ.s)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_map_s (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
φ.map L hL ≫ L.map φ.s = L.map φ.f := by
letI := hL _ φ.hs
simp [map]
variable (W)
lemma map_ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
(ofHom W f).map L hL = L.map f := by
simp [map]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_ofInv_hom_id (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
(ofInv s hs).map L hL ≫ L.map s = 𝟙 _ := by
letI := hL _ hs
simp [map]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_hom_ofInv_id (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.map s ≫ (ofInv s hs).map L hL = 𝟙 _ := by
letI := hL _ hs
simp [map]
variable {W}
lemma cases (α : W.LeftFraction X Y) :
∃ (Y' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y') (s : Y ⟶ Y') (hs : W s), α = LeftFraction.mk f s hs :=
⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩
end LeftFraction
/-- A right fraction from `X : C` to `Y : C` for `W : MorphismProperty C` consists of the
datum of an object `X' : C` and maps `s : X' ⟶ X` and `f : X' ⟶ Y` such that `W s`. -/
structure RightFraction (W : MorphismProperty C) (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of a right fraction -/
{X' : C}
/-- the denominator of a right fraction -/
s : X' ⟶ X
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
/-- the numerator of a right fraction -/
f : X' ⟶ Y
namespace RightFraction
variable (W : MorphismProperty C)
variable {X Y : C}
/-- The right fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
W.RightFraction X Y := mk (𝟙 X) (W.id_mem X) f
variable {W}
/-- The right fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `s : Y ⟶ X` such that `W s`. -/
@[simps]
def ofInv (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) :
W.RightFraction X Y := mk s hs (𝟙 Y)
/-- If `φ : W.RightFraction X Y` and `L` is a functor which inverts `W`, this is the
induced morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` -/
noncomputable def map (φ : W.RightFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y :=
have := hL _ φ.hs
inv (L.map φ.s) ≫ L.map φ.f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_s_comp_map (φ : W.RightFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.map φ.s ≫ φ.map L hL = L.map φ.f := by
letI := hL _ φ.hs
simp [map]
variable (W)
@[simp]
lemma map_ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
(ofHom W f).map L hL = L.map f := by
simp [map]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_ofInv_hom_id (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
(ofInv s hs).map L hL ≫ L.map s = 𝟙 _ := by
letI := hL _ hs
simp [map]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_hom_ofInv_id (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.map s ≫ (ofInv s hs).map L hL = 𝟙 _ := by
letI := hL _ hs
simp [map]
variable {W}
lemma cases (α : W.RightFraction X Y) :
∃ (X' : C) (s : X' ⟶ X) (hs : W s) (f : X' ⟶ Y) , α = RightFraction.mk s hs f :=
⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩
end RightFraction
variable (W : MorphismProperty C)
/-- A multiplicative morphism property `W` has left calculus of fractions if
any right fraction can be turned into a left fraction and that two morphisms
that can be equalized by precomposition with a morphism in `W` can also
be equalized by postcomposition with a morphism in `W`. -/
class HasLeftCalculusOfFractions : Prop extends W.IsMultiplicative where
exists_leftFraction ⦃X Y : C⦄ (φ : W.RightFraction X Y) :
∃ (ψ : W.LeftFraction X Y), φ.f ≫ ψ.s = φ.s ≫ ψ.f
ext : ∀ ⦃X' X Y : C⦄ (f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y) (s : X' ⟶ X) (_ : W s)
(_ : s ≫ f₁ = s ≫ f₂), ∃ (Y' : C) (t : Y ⟶ Y') (_ : W t), f₁ ≫ t = f₂ ≫ t
/-- A multiplicative morphism property `W` has right calculus of fractions if
any left fraction can be turned into a right fraction and that two morphisms
that can be equalized by postcomposition with a morphism in `W` can also
be equalized by precomposition with a morphism in `W`. -/
class HasRightCalculusOfFractions : Prop extends W.IsMultiplicative where
exists_rightFraction ⦃X Y : C⦄ (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) :
∃ (ψ : W.RightFraction X Y), ψ.s ≫ φ.f = ψ.f ≫ φ.s
ext : ∀ ⦃X Y Y' : C⦄ (f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y) (s : Y ⟶ Y') (_ : W s)
(_ : f₁ ≫ s = f₂ ≫ s), ∃ (X' : C) (t : X' ⟶ X) (_ : W t), t ≫ f₁ = t ≫ f₂
variable {W}
lemma RightFraction.exists_leftFraction [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] {X Y : C}
(φ : W.RightFraction X Y) : ∃ (ψ : W.LeftFraction X Y), φ.f ≫ ψ.s = φ.s ≫ ψ.f :=
HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.exists_leftFraction φ
/-- A choice of a left fraction deduced from a right fraction for a morphism property `W`
when `W` has left calculus of fractions. -/
noncomputable def RightFraction.leftFraction [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] {X Y : C}
(φ : W.RightFraction X Y) : W.LeftFraction X Y :=
φ.exists_leftFraction.choose
@[reassoc]
lemma RightFraction.leftFraction_fac [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] {X Y : C}
(φ : W.RightFraction X Y) : φ.f ≫ φ.leftFraction.s = φ.s ≫ φ.leftFraction.f :=
φ.exists_leftFraction.choose_spec
lemma LeftFraction.exists_rightFraction [W.HasRightCalculusOfFractions] {X Y : C}
(φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) : ∃ (ψ : W.RightFraction X Y), ψ.s ≫ φ.f = ψ.f ≫ φ.s :=
HasRightCalculusOfFractions.exists_rightFraction φ
/-- A choice of a right fraction deduced from a left fraction for a morphism property `W`
when `W` has right calculus of fractions. -/
noncomputable def LeftFraction.rightFraction [W.HasRightCalculusOfFractions] {X Y : C}
(φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) : W.RightFraction X Y :=
φ.exists_rightFraction.choose
@[reassoc]
lemma LeftFraction.rightFraction_fac [W.HasRightCalculusOfFractions] {X Y : C}
(φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) : φ.rightFraction.s ≫ φ.f = φ.rightFraction.f ≫ φ.s :=
φ.exists_rightFraction.choose_spec
/-- The equivalence relation on left fractions for a morphism property `W`. -/
def LeftFractionRel {X Y : C} (z₁ z₂ : W.LeftFraction X Y) : Prop :=
∃ (Z : C) (t₁ : z₁.Y' ⟶ Z) (t₂ : z₂.Y' ⟶ Z) (_ : z₁.s ≫ t₁ = z₂.s ≫ t₂)
(_ : z₁.f ≫ t₁ = z₂.f ≫ t₂), W (z₁.s ≫ t₁)
namespace LeftFractionRel
lemma refl {X Y : C} (z : W.LeftFraction X Y) : LeftFractionRel z z :=
⟨z.Y', 𝟙 _, 𝟙 _, rfl, rfl, by simpa only [Category.comp_id] using z.hs⟩
lemma symm {X Y : C} {z₁ z₂ : W.LeftFraction X Y} (h : LeftFractionRel z₁ z₂) :
LeftFractionRel z₂ z₁ := by
obtain ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩ := h
exact ⟨Z, t₂, t₁, hst.symm, hft.symm, by simpa only [← hst] using ht⟩
lemma trans {X Y : C} {z₁ z₂ z₃ : W.LeftFraction X Y}
[HasLeftCalculusOfFractions W]
(h₁₂ : LeftFractionRel z₁ z₂) (h₂₃ : LeftFractionRel z₂ z₃) :
LeftFractionRel z₁ z₃ := by
obtain ⟨Z₄, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩ := h₁₂
obtain ⟨Z₅, u₂, u₃, hsu, hfu, hu⟩ := h₂₃
obtain ⟨⟨v₄, v₅, hv₅⟩, fac⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.exists_leftFraction
(RightFraction.mk (z₁.s ≫ t₁) ht (z₃.s ≫ u₃))
simp only [Category.assoc] at fac
have eq : z₂.s ≫ u₂ ≫ v₅ = z₂.s ≫ t₂ ≫ v₄ := by
simpa only [← reassoc_of% hsu, reassoc_of% hst] using fac
obtain ⟨Z₇, w, hw, fac'⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ z₂.hs eq
simp only [Category.assoc] at fac'
refine ⟨Z₇, t₁ ≫ v₄ ≫ w, u₃ ≫ v₅ ≫ w, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [reassoc_of% fac]
· rw [reassoc_of% hft, ← fac', reassoc_of% hfu]
· rw [← reassoc_of% fac, ← reassoc_of% hsu, ← Category.assoc]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ hu (W.comp_mem _ _ hv₅ hw)
end LeftFractionRel
section
variable (W)
lemma equivalenceLeftFractionRel [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] (X Y : C) :
@_root_.Equivalence (W.LeftFraction X Y) LeftFractionRel where
refl := LeftFractionRel.refl
symm := LeftFractionRel.symm
trans := LeftFractionRel.trans
variable {W}
namespace LeftFraction
open HasLeftCalculusOfFractions
/-- Auxiliary definition for the composition of left fractions. -/
@[simp]
def comp₀ [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] {X Y Z : C}
(z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z) (z₃ : W.LeftFraction z₁.Y' z₂.Y') :
W.LeftFraction X Z :=
mk (z₁.f ≫ z₃.f) (z₂.s ≫ z₃.s) (W.comp_mem _ _ z₂.hs z₃.hs)
/-- The equivalence class of `z₁.comp₀ z₂ z₃` does not depend on the choice of `z₃` provided
they satisfy the compatibility `z₂.f ≫ z₃.s = z₁.s ≫ z₃.f`. -/
lemma comp₀_rel [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions]
{X Y Z : C} (z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z)
(z₃ z₃' : W.LeftFraction z₁.Y' z₂.Y') (h₃ : z₂.f ≫ z₃.s = z₁.s ≫ z₃.f)
(h₃' : z₂.f ≫ z₃'.s = z₁.s ≫ z₃'.f) :
LeftFractionRel (z₁.comp₀ z₂ z₃) (z₁.comp₀ z₂ z₃') := by
obtain ⟨z₄, fac⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk z₃.s z₃.hs z₃'.s)
dsimp at fac
have eq : z₁.s ≫ z₃.f ≫ z₄.f = z₁.s ≫ z₃'.f ≫ z₄.s := by
rw [← reassoc_of% h₃, ← reassoc_of% h₃', fac]
obtain ⟨Y, t, ht, fac'⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ z₁.hs eq
simp only [assoc] at fac'
refine ⟨Y, z₄.f ≫ t, z₄.s ≫ t, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [comp₀, assoc, reassoc_of% fac]
· simp only [comp₀, assoc, fac']
· simp only [comp₀, assoc, ← reassoc_of% fac]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ z₂.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₃'.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₄.hs ht))
variable (W) in
/-- The morphisms in the constructed localized category for a morphism property `W`
that has left calculus of fractions are equivalence classes of left fractions. -/
def Localization.Hom (X Y : C) :=
Quot (LeftFractionRel : W.LeftFraction X Y → W.LeftFraction X Y → Prop)
/-- The morphism in the constructed localized category that is induced by a left fraction. -/
def Localization.Hom.mk {X Y : C} (z : W.LeftFraction X Y) : Localization.Hom W X Y :=
Quot.mk _ z
lemma Localization.Hom.mk_surjective {X Y : C} (f : Localization.Hom W X Y) :
∃ (z : W.LeftFraction X Y), f = mk z := by
obtain ⟨z⟩ := f
exact ⟨z, rfl⟩
variable [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions]
/-- Auxiliary definition towards the definition of the composition of morphisms
in the constructed localized category for a morphism property that has
left calculus of fractions. -/
noncomputable def comp
{X Y Z : C} (z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z) :
Localization.Hom W X Z :=
Localization.Hom.mk (z₁.comp₀ z₂ (RightFraction.mk z₁.s z₁.hs z₂.f).leftFraction)
lemma comp_eq {X Y Z : C} (z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z)
(z₃ : W.LeftFraction z₁.Y' z₂.Y') (h₃ : z₂.f ≫ z₃.s = z₁.s ≫ z₃.f) :
z₁.comp z₂ = Localization.Hom.mk (z₁.comp₀ z₂ z₃) :=
Quot.sound (LeftFraction.comp₀_rel _ _ _ _
(RightFraction.leftFraction_fac (RightFraction.mk z₁.s z₁.hs z₂.f)) h₃)
namespace Localization
/-- Composition of morphisms in the constructed localized category
for a morphism property that has left calculus of fractions. -/
noncomputable def Hom.comp {X Y Z : C} (z₁ : Hom W X Y) (z₂ : Hom W Y Z) : Hom W X Z := by
refine Quot.lift₂ (fun a b => a.comp b) ?_ ?_ z₁ z₂
· rintro a b₁ b₂ ⟨U, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩
obtain ⟨z₁, fac₁⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk a.s a.hs b₁.f)
obtain ⟨z₂, fac₂⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk a.s a.hs b₂.f)
obtain ⟨w₁, fac₁'⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk z₁.s z₁.hs t₁)
obtain ⟨w₂, fac₂'⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk z₂.s z₂.hs t₂)
obtain ⟨u, fac₃⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk w₁.s w₁.hs w₂.s)
dsimp at fac₁ fac₂ fac₁' fac₂' fac₃ ⊢
have eq : a.s ≫ z₁.f ≫ w₁.f ≫ u.f = a.s ≫ z₂.f ≫ w₂.f ≫ u.s := by
rw [← reassoc_of% fac₁, ← reassoc_of% fac₂, ← reassoc_of% fac₁', ← reassoc_of% fac₂',
reassoc_of% hft, fac₃]
obtain ⟨Z, p, hp, fac₄⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ a.hs eq
simp only [assoc] at fac₄
rw [comp_eq _ _ z₁ fac₁, comp_eq _ _ z₂ fac₂]
apply Quot.sound
refine ⟨Z, w₁.f ≫ u.f ≫ p, w₂.f ≫ u.s ≫ p, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp
simp only [assoc, ← reassoc_of% fac₁', ← reassoc_of% fac₂',
reassoc_of% hst, reassoc_of% fac₃]
· dsimp
simp only [assoc, fac₄]
· dsimp
simp only [assoc]
rw [← reassoc_of% fac₁', ← reassoc_of% fac₃, ← assoc]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ ht (W.comp_mem _ _ w₂.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ u.hs hp))
· rintro a₁ a₂ b ⟨U, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩
obtain ⟨z₁, fac₁⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk a₁.s a₁.hs b.f)
obtain ⟨z₂, fac₂⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk a₂.s a₂.hs b.f)
obtain ⟨w₁, fac₁'⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk (a₁.s ≫ t₁) ht (b.f ≫ z₁.s))
obtain ⟨w₂, fac₂'⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk (a₂.s ≫ t₂)
(show W _ by rw [← hst]; exact ht) (b.f ≫ z₂.s))
let p₁ : W.LeftFraction X Z := LeftFraction.mk (a₁.f ≫ t₁ ≫ w₁.f) (b.s ≫ z₁.s ≫ w₁.s)
(W.comp_mem _ _ b.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₁.hs w₁.hs))
let p₂ : W.LeftFraction X Z := LeftFraction.mk (a₂.f ≫ t₂ ≫ w₂.f) (b.s ≫ z₂.s ≫ w₂.s)
(W.comp_mem _ _ b.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₂.hs w₂.hs))
dsimp at fac₁ fac₂ fac₁' fac₂' ⊢
simp only [assoc] at fac₁' fac₂'
rw [comp_eq _ _ z₁ fac₁, comp_eq _ _ z₂ fac₂]
apply Quot.sound
refine LeftFractionRel.trans ?_ ((?_ : LeftFractionRel p₁ p₂).trans ?_)
· have eq : a₁.s ≫ z₁.f ≫ w₁.s = a₁.s ≫ t₁ ≫ w₁.f := by rw [← fac₁', reassoc_of% fac₁]
obtain ⟨Z, u, hu, fac₃⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ a₁.hs eq
simp only [assoc] at fac₃
refine ⟨Z, w₁.s ≫ u, u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp [p₁]
simp only [assoc]
· dsimp [p₁]
simp only [assoc, fac₃]
· dsimp
simp only [assoc]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ b.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₁.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ w₁.hs hu))
· obtain ⟨q, fac₃⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk (z₁.s ≫ w₁.s)
(W.comp_mem _ _ z₁.hs w₁.hs) (z₂.s ≫ w₂.s))
dsimp at fac₃
simp only [assoc] at fac₃
have eq : a₁.s ≫ t₁ ≫ w₁.f ≫ q.f = a₁.s ≫ t₁ ≫ w₂.f ≫ q.s := by
rw [← reassoc_of% fac₁', ← fac₃, reassoc_of% hst, reassoc_of% fac₂']
obtain ⟨Z, u, hu, fac₄⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ a₁.hs eq
simp only [assoc] at fac₄
refine ⟨Z, q.f ≫ u, q.s ≫ u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [p₁, p₂, assoc, reassoc_of% fac₃]
· rw [assoc, assoc, assoc, assoc, fac₄, reassoc_of% hft]
· simp only [p₁, p₂, assoc, ← reassoc_of% fac₃]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ b.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₂.hs
(W.comp_mem _ _ w₂.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ q.hs hu)))
· have eq : a₂.s ≫ z₂.f ≫ w₂.s = a₂.s ≫ t₂ ≫ w₂.f := by
rw [← fac₂', reassoc_of% fac₂]
obtain ⟨Z, u, hu, fac₄⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ a₂.hs eq
simp only [assoc] at fac₄
refine ⟨Z, u, w₂.s ≫ u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp [p₁, p₂]
simp only [assoc]
· dsimp [p₁, p₂]
simp only [assoc, fac₄]
· dsimp [p₁, p₂]
simp only [assoc]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ b.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ z₂.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ w₂.hs hu))
lemma Hom.comp_eq {X Y Z : C} (z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z) :
Hom.comp (mk z₁) (mk z₂) = z₁.comp z₂ := rfl
end Localization
/-- The constructed localized category for a morphism property
that has left calculus of fractions. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Localization (_ : MorphismProperty C) := C
namespace Localization
noncomputable instance : Category (Localization W) where
Hom X Y := Localization.Hom W X Y
id _ := Localization.Hom.mk (ofHom W (𝟙 _))
comp f g := f.comp g
comp_id := by
rintro (X Y : C) f
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f
change (Hom.mk z).comp (Hom.mk (ofHom W (𝟙 Y))) = Hom.mk z
rw [Hom.comp_eq, comp_eq z (ofHom W (𝟙 Y)) (ofInv z.s z.hs) (by simp)]
dsimp [comp₀]
simp only [comp_id, id_comp]
id_comp := by
rintro (X Y : C) f
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f
change (Hom.mk (ofHom W (𝟙 X))).comp (Hom.mk z) = Hom.mk z
rw [Hom.comp_eq, comp_eq (ofHom W (𝟙 X)) z (ofHom W z.f) (by simp)]
dsimp
simp only [comp₀, id_comp, comp_id]
assoc := by
rintro (X₁ X₂ X₃ X₄ : C) f₁ f₂ f₃
obtain ⟨z₁, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f₁
obtain ⟨z₂, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f₂
obtain ⟨z₃, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f₃
change ((Hom.mk z₁).comp (Hom.mk z₂)).comp (Hom.mk z₃) =
(Hom.mk z₁).comp ((Hom.mk z₂).comp (Hom.mk z₃))
rw [Hom.comp_eq z₁ z₂, Hom.comp_eq z₂ z₃]
obtain ⟨z₁₂, fac₁₂⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk z₁.s z₁.hs z₂.f)
obtain ⟨z₂₃, fac₂₃⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk z₂.s z₂.hs z₃.f)
obtain ⟨z', fac⟩ := exists_leftFraction (RightFraction.mk z₁₂.s z₁₂.hs z₂₃.f)
dsimp at fac₁₂ fac₂₃ fac
rw [comp_eq z₁ z₂ z₁₂ fac₁₂, comp_eq z₂ z₃ z₂₃ fac₂₃, comp₀, comp₀,
Hom.comp_eq, Hom.comp_eq,
comp_eq _ z₃ (mk z'.f (z₂₃.s ≫ z'.s) (W.comp_mem _ _ z₂₃.hs z'.hs))
(by dsimp; rw [assoc, reassoc_of% fac₂₃, fac]),
comp_eq z₁ _ (mk (z₁₂.f ≫ z'.f) z'.s z'.hs)
(by dsimp; rw [assoc, ← reassoc_of% fac₁₂, fac])]
simp
variable (W) in
/-- The localization functor to the constructed localized category for a morphism property
that has left calculus of fractions. -/
@[simps obj]
def Q : C ⥤ Localization W where
obj X := X
map f := Hom.mk (ofHom W f)
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp {X Y Z} f g := by
change _ = Hom.comp _ _
rw [Hom.comp_eq, comp_eq (ofHom W f) (ofHom W g) (ofHom W g) (by simp)]
simp only [ofHom, comp₀, comp_id]
/-- The morphism on `Localization W` that is induced by a left fraction. -/
abbrev homMk {X Y : C} (f : W.LeftFraction X Y) : (Q W).obj X ⟶ (Q W).obj Y := Hom.mk f
lemma homMk_eq_hom_mk {X Y : C} (f : W.LeftFraction X Y) : homMk f = Hom.mk f := rfl
variable (W)
lemma Q_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Q W).map f = homMk (ofHom W f) := rfl
variable {W}
lemma homMk_comp_homMk {X Y Z : C} (z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z)
(z₃ : W.LeftFraction z₁.Y' z₂.Y') (h₃ : z₂.f ≫ z₃.s = z₁.s ≫ z₃.f) :
homMk z₁ ≫ homMk z₂ = homMk (z₁.comp₀ z₂ z₃) := by
change Hom.comp _ _ = _
rw [Hom.comp_eq, comp_eq z₁ z₂ z₃ h₃]
lemma homMk_eq_of_leftFractionRel {X Y : C} (z₁ z₂ : W.LeftFraction X Y)
(h : LeftFractionRel z₁ z₂) :
homMk z₁ = homMk z₂ :=
Quot.sound h
lemma homMk_eq_iff_leftFractionRel {X Y : C} (z₁ z₂ : W.LeftFraction X Y) :
homMk z₁ = homMk z₂ ↔ LeftFractionRel z₁ z₂ :=
@Equivalence.quot_mk_eq_iff _ _ (equivalenceLeftFractionRel W X Y) _ _
/-- The morphism in `Localization W` that is the formal inverse of a morphism
which belongs to `W`. -/
def Qinv {X Y : C} (s : X ⟶ Y) (hs : W s) : (Q W).obj Y ⟶ (Q W).obj X := homMk (ofInv s hs)
lemma Q_map_comp_Qinv {X Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y') (s : Y ⟶ Y') (hs : W s) :
(Q W).map f ≫ Qinv s hs = homMk (mk f s hs) := by
dsimp only [Q_map, Qinv]
rw [homMk_comp_homMk (ofHom W f) (ofInv s hs) (ofHom W (𝟙 _)) (by simp)]
simp
/-- The isomorphism in `Localization W` that is induced by a morphism in `W`. -/
@[simps]
def Qiso {X Y : C} (s : X ⟶ Y) (hs : W s) : (Q W).obj X ≅ (Q W).obj Y where
hom := (Q W).map s
inv := Qinv s hs
hom_inv_id := by
rw [Q_map_comp_Qinv]
apply homMk_eq_of_leftFractionRel
exact ⟨_, 𝟙 Y, s, by simp, by simp, by simpa using hs⟩
inv_hom_id := by
dsimp only [Qinv, Q_map]
rw [homMk_comp_homMk (ofInv s hs) (ofHom W s) (ofHom W (𝟙 Y)) (by simp)]
apply homMk_eq_of_leftFractionRel
exact ⟨_, 𝟙 Y, 𝟙 Y, by simp, by simp, by simpa using W.id_mem Y⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Qiso_hom_inv_id {X Y : C} (s : X ⟶ Y) (hs : W s) :
(Q W).map s ≫ Qinv s hs = 𝟙 _ := (Qiso s hs).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Qiso_inv_hom_id {X Y : C} (s : X ⟶ Y) (hs : W s) :
Qinv s hs ≫ (Q W).map s = 𝟙 _ := (Qiso s hs).inv_hom_id
instance {X Y : C} (s : X ⟶ Y) (hs : W s) : IsIso (Qinv s hs) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (Qiso s hs).inv)
section
variable {E : Type*} [Category E]
/-- The image by a functor which inverts `W` of an equivalence class of left fractions. -/
noncomputable def Hom.map {X Y : C} (f : Hom W X Y) (F : C ⥤ E) (hF : W.IsInvertedBy F) :
F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y :=
Quot.lift (fun f => f.map F hF) (by
intro a₁ a₂ ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, h⟩
dsimp
have := hF _ h
rw [← cancel_mono (F.map (a₁.s ≫ t₁)), F.map_comp, map_comp_map_s_assoc,
← F.map_comp, ← F.map_comp, hst, hft, F.map_comp,
F.map_comp, map_comp_map_s_assoc]) f
@[simp]
lemma Hom.map_mk {W} {X Y : C} (f : LeftFraction W X Y)
(F : C ⥤ E) (hF : W.IsInvertedBy F) :
Hom.map (Hom.mk f) F hF = f.map F hF := rfl
namespace StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget
variable (W)
lemma inverts : W.IsInvertedBy (Q W) := fun _ _ s hs =>
(inferInstance : IsIso (Qiso s hs).hom)
variable {W}
/-- The functor `Localization W ⥤ E` that is induced by a functor `C ⥤ E` which inverts `W`,
when `W` has a left calculus of fractions. -/
noncomputable def lift (F : C ⥤ E) (hF : W.IsInvertedBy F) :
Localization W ⥤ E where
obj X := F.obj X
map {_ _ : C} f := f.map F hF
map_id := by
intro (X : C)
change (Hom.mk (ofHom W (𝟙 X))).map F hF = _
rw [Hom.map_mk, map_ofHom, F.map_id]
map_comp := by
rintro (X Y Z : C) f g
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f
obtain ⟨g, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective g
dsimp
obtain ⟨z, fac⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.exists_leftFraction
(RightFraction.mk f.s f.hs g.f)
rw [homMk_comp_homMk f g z fac, Hom.map_mk]
dsimp at fac ⊢
have := hF _ g.hs
have := hF _ z.hs
rw [← cancel_mono (F.map g.s), assoc, map_comp_map_s,
← cancel_mono (F.map z.s), assoc, assoc, ← F.map_comp,
← F.map_comp, map_comp_map_s, fac]
dsimp
rw [F.map_comp, F.map_comp, map_comp_map_s_assoc]
lemma fac (F : C ⥤ E) (hF : W.IsInvertedBy F) : Q W ⋙ lift F hF = F :=
Functor.ext (fun _ => rfl) (fun X Y f => by
dsimp [lift]
rw [Q_map, Hom.map_mk, id_comp, comp_id, map_ofHom])
lemma uniq (F₁ F₂ : Localization W ⥤ E) (h : Q W ⋙ F₁ = Q W ⋙ F₂) : F₁ = F₂ :=
Functor.ext (fun X => Functor.congr_obj h X) (by
rintro (X Y : C) f
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := Hom.mk_surjective f
rw [show Hom.mk f = homMk (mk f.f f.s f.hs) by rfl,
← Q_map_comp_Qinv f.f f.s f.hs, F₁.map_comp, F₂.map_comp, assoc]
erw [Functor.congr_hom h f.f]
rw [assoc, assoc]
congr 2
have := inverts W _ f.hs
rw [← cancel_epi (F₂.map ((Q W).map f.s)), ← F₂.map_comp_assoc,
Qiso_hom_inv_id, Functor.map_id, id_comp]
erw [Functor.congr_hom h.symm f.s]
dsimp
rw [assoc, assoc, eqToHom_trans_assoc, eqToHom_refl, id_comp, ← F₁.map_comp,
Qiso_hom_inv_id]
dsimp
rw [F₁.map_id, comp_id])
end StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget
variable (W)
open StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget in
/-- The universal property of the localization for the constructed localized category
when there is a left calculus of fractions. -/
noncomputable def strictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget (E : Type*) [Category E] :
Localization.StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget (Q W) W E where
inverts := inverts W
lift := lift
fac := fac
uniq := uniq
instance : (Q W).IsLocalization W :=
Functor.IsLocalization.mk' _ _
(strictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget W _)
(strictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget W _)
end
lemma homMk_eq {X Y : C} (f : LeftFraction W X Y) :
homMk f = f.map (Q W) (Localization.inverts _ W) := by
have := Localization.inverts (Q W) W f.s f.hs
rw [← Q_map_comp_Qinv f.f f.s f.hs, ← cancel_mono ((Q W).map f.s),
assoc, Qiso_inv_hom_id, comp_id, map_comp_map_s]
lemma map_eq_iff {X Y : C} (f g : LeftFraction W X Y) :
f.map (LeftFraction.Localization.Q W) (Localization.inverts _ _) =
g.map (LeftFraction.Localization.Q W) (Localization.inverts _ _) ↔
LeftFractionRel f g := by
simp only [← Hom.map_mk _ (Q W)]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← homMk_eq_iff_leftFractionRel, homMk_eq, homMk_eq]
exact h
· intro h
congr 1
exact Quot.sound h
end Localization
section
lemma map_eq {W} {X Y : C} (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) [L.IsLocalization W] :
φ.map L (Localization.inverts L W) =
L.map φ.f ≫ (Localization.isoOfHom L W φ.s φ.hs).inv := rfl
lemma map_compatibility {W} {X Y : C}
(φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) {E : Type*} [Category E]
(L₁ : C ⥤ D) (L₂ : C ⥤ E) [L₁.IsLocalization W] [L₂.IsLocalization W] :
(Localization.uniq L₁ L₂ W).functor.map (φ.map L₁ (Localization.inverts L₁ W)) =
(Localization.compUniqFunctor L₁ L₂ W).hom.app X ≫
φ.map L₂ (Localization.inverts L₂ W) ≫
(Localization.compUniqFunctor L₁ L₂ W).inv.app Y := by
let e := Localization.compUniqFunctor L₁ L₂ W
have := Localization.inverts L₂ W φ.s φ.hs
rw [← cancel_mono (e.hom.app Y), assoc, assoc, e.inv_hom_id_app, comp_id,
← cancel_mono (L₂.map φ.s), assoc, assoc, map_comp_map_s, ← e.hom.naturality]
simpa [← Functor.map_comp_assoc, map_comp_map_s] using e.hom.naturality φ.f
lemma map_eq_of_map_eq {W} {X Y : C}
(φ₁ φ₂ : W.LeftFraction X Y) {E : Type*} [Category E]
(L₁ : C ⥤ D) (L₂ : C ⥤ E) [L₁.IsLocalization W] [L₂.IsLocalization W]
(h : φ₁.map L₁ (Localization.inverts L₁ W) = φ₂.map L₁ (Localization.inverts L₁ W)) :
φ₁.map L₂ (Localization.inverts L₂ W) = φ₂.map L₂ (Localization.inverts L₂ W) := by
apply (Localization.uniq L₂ L₁ W).functor.map_injective
rw [map_compatibility φ₁ L₂ L₁, map_compatibility φ₂ L₂ L₁, h]
lemma map_comp_map_eq_map {X Y Z : C} (z₁ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (z₂ : W.LeftFraction Y Z)
(z₃ : W.LeftFraction z₁.Y' z₂.Y') (h₃ : z₂.f ≫ z₃.s = z₁.s ≫ z₃.f)
(L : C ⥤ D) [L.IsLocalization W] :
z₁.map L (Localization.inverts L W) ≫ z₂.map L (Localization.inverts L W) =
(z₁.comp₀ z₂ z₃).map L (Localization.inverts L W) := by
have := Localization.inverts L W _ z₂.hs
have := Localization.inverts L W _ z₃.hs
have : IsIso (L.map (z₂.s ≫ z₃.s)) := by
rw [L.map_comp]
infer_instance
dsimp [LeftFraction.comp₀]
rw [← cancel_mono (L.map (z₂.s ≫ z₃.s)), map_comp_map_s,
L.map_comp, assoc, map_comp_map_s_assoc, ← L.map_comp, h₃,
L.map_comp, map_comp_map_s_assoc, L.map_comp]
end
end LeftFraction
end
end MorphismProperty
variable (L : C ⥤ D) (W : MorphismProperty C) [L.IsLocalization W]
section
variable [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions]
lemma Localization.exists_leftFraction {X Y : C} (f : L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y) :
∃ (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y), f = φ.map L (Localization.inverts L W) := by
let E := Localization.uniq (MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.Localization.Q W) L W
let e : _ ⋙ E.functor ≅ L := Localization.compUniqFunctor _ _ _
obtain ⟨f', rfl⟩ : ∃ (f' : E.functor.obj X ⟶ E.functor.obj Y),
f = e.inv.app _ ≫ f' ≫ e.hom.app _ := ⟨e.hom.app _ ≫ f ≫ e.inv.app _, by simp⟩
obtain ⟨g, rfl⟩ := E.functor.map_surjective f'
obtain ⟨g, rfl⟩ := MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.Localization.Hom.mk_surjective g
refine ⟨g, ?_⟩
rw [← MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.Localization.homMk_eq_hom_mk,
MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.Localization.homMk_eq g,
g.map_compatibility (MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.Localization.Q W) L,
assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, comp_id, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
lemma MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.map_eq_iff
{X Y : C} (φ ψ : W.LeftFraction X Y) :
φ.map L (Localization.inverts _ _) = ψ.map L (Localization.inverts _ _) ↔
LeftFractionRel φ ψ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.Localization.map_eq_iff]
apply map_eq_of_map_eq _ _ _ _ h
· intro h
simp only [← Localization.Hom.map_mk _ L (Localization.inverts _ _)]
congr 1
exact Quot.sound h
lemma MorphismProperty.map_eq_iff_postcomp {X Y : C} (f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y) :
L.map f₁ = L.map f₂ ↔ ∃ (Z : C) (s : Y ⟶ Z) (_ : W s), f₁ ≫ s = f₂ ≫ s := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← LeftFraction.map_ofHom W _ L (Localization.inverts _ _),
← LeftFraction.map_ofHom W _ L (Localization.inverts _ _),
LeftFraction.map_eq_iff] at h
obtain ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩ := h
dsimp at t₁ t₂ hst hft ht
simp only [id_comp] at hst
exact ⟨Z, t₁, by simpa using ht, by rw [hft, hst]⟩
· rintro ⟨Z, s, hs, fac⟩
simp only [← cancel_mono (Localization.isoOfHom L W s hs).hom,
Localization.isoOfHom_hom, ← L.map_comp, fac]
include W in
lemma Localization.essSurj_mapArrow :
L.mapArrow.EssSurj where
mem_essImage f := by
have := Localization.essSurj L W
obtain ⟨X, ⟨eX⟩⟩ : ∃ (X : C), Nonempty (L.obj X ≅ f.left) :=
⟨_, ⟨L.objObjPreimageIso f.left⟩⟩
obtain ⟨Y, ⟨eY⟩⟩ : ∃ (Y : C), Nonempty (L.obj Y ≅ f.right) :=
⟨_, ⟨L.objObjPreimageIso f.right⟩⟩
obtain ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := Localization.exists_leftFraction L W (eX.hom ≫ f.hom ≫ eY.inv)
refine ⟨Arrow.mk φ.f, ⟨Iso.symm ?_⟩⟩
refine Arrow.isoMk eX.symm (eY.symm ≪≫ Localization.isoOfHom L W φ.s φ.hs) ?_
dsimp
simp only [← cancel_epi eX.hom, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, reassoc_of% hφ,
MorphismProperty.LeftFraction.map_comp_map_s]
end
namespace MorphismProperty
variable {W}
/-- The right fraction in the opposite category corresponding to a left fraction. -/
@[simps]
def LeftFraction.op {X Y : C} (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) :
W.op.RightFraction (Opposite.op Y) (Opposite.op X) where
X' := Opposite.op φ.Y'
s := φ.s.op
hs := φ.hs
f := φ.f.op
/-- The left fraction in the opposite category corresponding to a right fraction. -/
@[simps]
def RightFraction.op {X Y : C} (φ : W.RightFraction X Y) :
W.op.LeftFraction (Opposite.op Y) (Opposite.op X) where
Y' := Opposite.op φ.X'
s := φ.s.op
hs := φ.hs
f := φ.f.op
/-- The right fraction corresponding to a left fraction in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def LeftFraction.unop {W : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ}
{X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) :
W.unop.RightFraction (Opposite.unop Y) (Opposite.unop X) where
X' := Opposite.unop φ.Y'
s := φ.s.unop
hs := φ.hs
f := φ.f.unop
/-- The left fraction corresponding to a right fraction in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def RightFraction.unop {W : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ}
{X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (φ : W.RightFraction X Y) :
W.unop.LeftFraction (Opposite.unop Y) (Opposite.unop X) where
Y' := Opposite.unop φ.X'
s := φ.s.unop
hs := φ.hs
f := φ.f.unop
lemma RightFraction.op_map
{X Y : C} (φ : W.RightFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
(φ.map L hL).op = φ.op.map L.op hL.op := by
dsimp [map, LeftFraction.map]
rw [op_inv]
lemma LeftFraction.op_map
{X Y : C} (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
| (φ.map L hL).op = φ.op.map L.op hL.op := by
dsimp [map, RightFraction.map]
rw [op_inv]
instance [h : W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] : W.op.HasRightCalculusOfFractions where
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/CalculusOfFractions.lean | 833 | 837 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ShortExact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Kernels
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
/-!
# Homology and exactness of short complexes of abelian groups
In this file, the homology of a short complex `S` of abelian groups is identified
with the quotient of `AddMonoidHom.ker S.g` by the image of the morphism
`S.abToCycles : S.X₁ →+ AddMonoidHom.ker S.g` induced by `S.f`.
The definitions are made in the `ShortComplex` namespace so as to enable dot notation.
The names contain the prefix `ab` in order to allow similar constructions for
other categories like `ModuleCat`.
## Main definitions
- `ShortComplex.abHomologyIso` identifies the homology of a short complex of abelian
groups to an explicit quotient.
- `ShortComplex.ab_exact_iff` expresses that a short complex of abelian groups `S`
is exact iff any element in the kernel of `S.g` belongs to the image of `S.f`.
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace ShortComplex
variable (S : ShortComplex Ab.{u})
@[simp]
lemma ab_zero_apply (x : S.X₁) : S.g (S.f x) = 0 := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, S.zero]
rfl
/-- The canonical additive morphism `S.X₁ →+ AddMonoidHom.ker S.g` induced by `S.f`. -/
@[simps!]
def abToCycles : S.X₁ →+ AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨S.f x, S.ab_zero_apply x⟩) (by aesop)
/-- The explicit left homology data of a short complex of abelian group that is
given by a kernel and a quotient given by the `AddMonoidHom` API. -/
@[simps]
def abLeftHomologyData : S.LeftHomologyData where
K := AddCommGrp.of (AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom)
H := AddCommGrp.of ((AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom) ⧸ AddMonoidHom.range S.abToCycles)
i := AddCommGrp.ofHom <| (AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom).subtype
π := AddCommGrp.ofHom <| QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
wi := by
ext ⟨_, hx⟩
exact hx
hi := AddCommGrp.kernelIsLimit _
wπ := by
ext (x : S.X₁)
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_zero_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_range]
apply exists_apply_eq_apply
hπ := AddCommGrp.cokernelIsColimit (AddCommGrp.ofHom S.abToCycles)
@[simp]
lemma abLeftHomologyData_f' : S.abLeftHomologyData.f' = AddCommGrp.ofHom S.abToCycles := rfl
/-- Given a short complex `S` of abelian groups, this is the isomorphism between
the abstract `S.cycles` of the homology API and the more concrete description as
`AddMonoidHom.ker S.g`. -/
noncomputable def abCyclesIso : S.cycles ≅ AddCommGrp.of (AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom) :=
S.abLeftHomologyData.cyclesIso
-- This was a simp lemma until we made `AddCommGrp.coe_of` a simp lemma,
-- after which the simp normal form linter complains.
-- It was not used a simp lemma in Mathlib.
-- Possible solution: higher priority function coercions that remove the `of`?
-- @[simp]
lemma abCyclesIso_inv_apply_iCycles (x : AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom) :
S.iCycles (S.abCyclesIso.inv x) = x := by
dsimp only [abCyclesIso]
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, S.abLeftHomologyData.cyclesIso_inv_comp_iCycles]
rfl
/-- Given a short complex `S` of abelian groups, this is the isomorphism between
the abstract `S.homology` of the homology API and the more explicit
quotient of `AddMonoidHom.ker S.g` by the image of
`S.abToCycles : S.X₁ →+ AddMonoidHom.ker S.g`. -/
noncomputable def abHomologyIso : S.homology ≅
AddCommGrp.of ((AddMonoidHom.ker S.g.hom) ⧸ AddMonoidHom.range S.abToCycles) :=
| S.abLeftHomologyData.homologyIso
lemma exact_iff_surjective_abToCycles :
S.Exact ↔ Function.Surjective S.abToCycles := by
rw [S.abLeftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f', abLeftHomologyData_f',
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Ab.lean | 93 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 1,060 | 1,071 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
-- TODO: remove Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced and move the last two lemmas to Lemmas
/-!
# Roots of unity
We define roots of unity in the context of an arbitrary commutative monoid,
as a subgroup of the group of units.
## Main definitions
* `rootsOfUnity n M`, for `n : ℕ` is the subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid `M`
consisting of elements `x` that satisfy `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main results
* `rootsOfUnity.isCyclic`: the roots of unity in an integral domain form a cyclic group.
## Implementation details
It is desirable that `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup,
and it will mainly be applied to rings (e.g. the ring of integers in a number field) and fields.
We therefore implement it as a subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid.
We have chosen to define `rootsOfUnity n` for `n : ℕ` and add a `[NeZero n]` typeclass
assumption when we need `n` to be non-zero (which is the case for most interesting statements).
Note that `rootsOfUnity 0 M` is the top subgroup of `Mˣ` (as the condition `ζ^0 = 1` is
satisfied for all units).
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
variable {M N G R S F : Type*}
variable [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N] [DivisionCommMonoid G]
section rootsOfUnity
variable {k l : ℕ}
/-- `rootsOfUnity k M` is the subgroup of elements `m : Mˣ` that satisfy `m ^ k = 1`. -/
def rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : Subgroup Mˣ where
carrier := {ζ | ζ ^ k = 1}
one_mem' := one_pow _
mul_mem' _ _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, mul_pow, one_mul]
inv_mem' _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, inv_pow, inv_one]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ ζ ^ k = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity` using `ζ : Mˣ`. -/
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity' (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ (ζ : M) ^ k = 1 := by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity]; norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity_one (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 1 M = ⊥ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_one, Subgroup.mem_bot]
@[simp]
lemma rootsOfUnity_zero (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 0 M = ⊤ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_zero, Subgroup.mem_top]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_injective {n : ℕ} :
Function.Injective (fun x : rootsOfUnity n M ↦ x.val.val) :=
Units.ext.comp fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.eq
/-- Make an element of `rootsOfUnity` from a member of the base ring, and a proof that it has
a positive power equal to one. -/
@[simps! coe_val]
def rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq (ζ : M) {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) : rootsOfUnity n M :=
⟨Units.ofPowEqOne ζ n h <| NeZero.ne n, Units.pow_ofPowEqOne _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_mkOfPowEq {ζ : M} {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) :
((rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq _ h : Mˣ) : M) = ζ :=
rfl
theorem rootsOfUnity_le_of_dvd (h : k ∣ l) : rootsOfUnity k M ≤ rootsOfUnity l M := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h
intro ζ h
simp_all only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_mul, one_pow]
theorem map_rootsOfUnity (f : Mˣ →* Nˣ) (k : ℕ) : (rootsOfUnity k M).map f ≤ rootsOfUnity k N := by
rintro _ ⟨ζ, h, rfl⟩
simp_all only [← map_pow, mem_rootsOfUnity, SetLike.mem_coe, MonoidHom.map_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_pow [CommMonoid R] (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) (m : ℕ) :
(((ζ ^ m :) : Rˣ) : R) = ((ζ : Rˣ) : R) ^ m := by
rw [Subgroup.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
/-- The canonical isomorphism from the `n`th roots of unity in `Mˣ`
to the `n`th roots of unity in `M`. -/
def rootsOfUnityUnitsMulEquiv (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n Mˣ ≃* rootsOfUnity n M where
toFun ζ := ⟨ζ.val, (mem_rootsOfUnity ..).mpr <| (mem_rootsOfUnity' ..).mp ζ.prop⟩
invFun ζ := ⟨toUnits ζ.val, by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, ← map_pow, EmbeddingLike.map_eq_one_iff]
exact (mem_rootsOfUnity ..).mp ζ.prop⟩
left_inv ζ := by simp only [toUnits_val_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv ζ := by simp only [val_toUnits_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
map_mul' ζ ζ' := by simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk]
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid R] [CommMonoid S] [FunLike F R S]
/-- Restrict a ring homomorphism to the nth roots of unity. -/
def restrictRootsOfUnity [MonoidHomClass F R S] (σ : F) (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n R →* rootsOfUnity n S :=
{ toFun := fun ξ ↦ ⟨Units.map σ (ξ : Rˣ), by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity, ← map_pow, Units.ext_iff, Units.coe_map, ξ.prop]
exact map_one σ⟩
map_one' := by ext1; simp only [OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one]
map_mul' := fun ξ₁ ξ₂ ↦ by
ext1; simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul, map_mul, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk] }
@[simp]
theorem restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply [MonoidHomClass F R S] (σ : F) (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(restrictRootsOfUnity σ k ζ : Sˣ) = σ (ζ : Rˣ) :=
rfl
/-- Restrict a monoid isomorphism to the nth roots of unity. -/
nonrec def MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity (σ : R ≃* S) (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n R ≃* rootsOfUnity n S where
toFun := restrictRootsOfUnity σ n
invFun := restrictRootsOfUnity σ.symm n
left_inv ξ := by ext; exact σ.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv ξ := by ext; exact σ.apply_symm_apply _
map_mul' := (restrictRootsOfUnity _ n).map_mul
@[simp]
theorem MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply (σ : R ≃* S) (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(σ.restrictRootsOfUnity k ζ : Sˣ) = σ (ζ : Rˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity_symm (σ : R ≃* S) :
(σ.restrictRootsOfUnity k).symm = σ.symm.restrictRootsOfUnity k :=
rfl
end CommMonoid
section IsDomain
-- The following results need `k` to be nonzero.
variable [NeZero k] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_iff_mem_nthRoots {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k R ↔ (ζ : R) ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) := by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, mem_nthRoots (NeZero.pos k), Units.ext_iff, Units.val_one,
Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
variable (k R)
/-- Equivalence between the `k`-th roots of unity in `R` and the `k`-th roots of `1`.
This is implemented as equivalence of subtypes,
because `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup of the group of units,
whereas `nthRoots` is a multiset. -/
def rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots : rootsOfUnity k R ≃ { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } where
toFun x := ⟨(x : Rˣ), mem_rootsOfUnity_iff_mem_nthRoots.mp x.2⟩
invFun x := by
refine ⟨⟨x, ↑x ^ (k - 1 : ℕ), ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
all_goals
rcases x with ⟨x, hx⟩; rw [mem_nthRoots <| NeZero.pos k] at hx
simp only [← pow_succ, ← pow_succ', hx, tsub_add_cancel_of_le NeZero.one_le]
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, hx, Units.val_one]
left_inv := by rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; ext; rfl
right_inv := by rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; ext; rfl
variable {k R}
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots_apply (x : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k x : R) = ((x : Rˣ) : R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots_symm_apply (x : { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) }) :
(((rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k).symm x : Rˣ) : R) = (x : R) :=
rfl
variable (k R)
instance rootsOfUnity.fintype : Fintype (rootsOfUnity k R) := by
classical
exact Fintype.ofEquiv { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } (rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k).symm
instance rootsOfUnity.isCyclic : IsCyclic (rootsOfUnity k R) :=
isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain ((Units.coeHom R).comp (rootsOfUnity k R).subtype) coe_injective
theorem card_rootsOfUnity : Fintype.card (rootsOfUnity k R) ≤ k := by
classical
calc
Fintype.card (rootsOfUnity k R) = Fintype.card { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } :=
Fintype.card_congr (rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k)
_ ≤ Multiset.card (nthRoots k (1 : R)).attach := Multiset.card_le_card (Multiset.dedup_le _)
_ = Multiset.card (nthRoots k (1 : R)) := Multiset.card_attach
_ ≤ k := card_nthRoots k 1
variable {k R}
theorem map_rootsOfUnity_eq_pow_self [FunLike F R R] [MonoidHomClass F R R] (σ : F)
(ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
∃ m : ℕ, σ (ζ : Rˣ) = ((ζ : Rˣ) : R) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := MonoidHom.map_cyclic (restrictRootsOfUnity σ k)
rw [← restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply, hm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.toNat_of_nonneg
(m.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (pos_iff_ne_zero.mp (orderOf_pos ζ)))),
zpow_natCast, rootsOfUnity.coe_pow]
exact ⟨(m % orderOf ζ).toNat, rfl⟩
end IsDomain
section Reduced
variable (R) [CommRing R] [IsReduced R]
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff'`
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff (p k : ℕ) (m : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity (p ^ k * m) R ↔ ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity m R := by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity', ExpChar.pow_prime_pow_mul_eq_one_iff]
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff` in terms of `ζ ^ _` -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff' (p k : ℕ) (m : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ^ (p ^ k * m) = 1 ↔ ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity m R := by
rw [← mem_rootsOfUnity, mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff]
end Reduced
end rootsOfUnity
section cyclic
namespace IsCyclic
/-- The isomorphism from the group of group homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group `G` of order
`n` into another group `G'` to the group of `n`th roots of unity in `G'` determined by a generator
`g` of `G`. It sends `φ : G →* G'` to `φ g`. -/
noncomputable
def monoidHomMulEquivRootsOfUnityOfGenerator {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] {g : G}
(hg : ∀ (x : G), x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers g) (G' : Type*) [CommGroup G'] :
(G →* G') ≃* rootsOfUnity (Nat.card G) G' where
toFun φ := ⟨(IsUnit.map φ <| Group.isUnit g).unit, by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, IsUnit.unit_spec,
← map_pow, pow_card_eq_one', map_one, Units.val_one]⟩
invFun ζ := monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers hg (g' := (ζ.val : G')) <| by
simpa only [orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one,
← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_eq_one] using ζ.prop
left_inv φ := (MonoidHom.eq_iff_eq_on_generator hg _ φ).mpr <| by
simp only [IsUnit.unit_spec, monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers_apply_gen]
right_inv φ := Subtype.ext <| by
simp only [monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers_apply_gen, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
map_mul' x y := by
simp only [MonoidHom.mul_apply, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq, Units.ext_iff,
IsUnit.unit_spec, Units.val_mul]
/-- The group of group homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group `G` of order `n` into another
group `G'` is (noncanonically) isomorphic to the group of `n`th roots of unity in `G'`. -/
lemma monoidHom_mulEquiv_rootsOfUnity (G : Type*) [CommGroup G] [IsCyclic G]
(G' : Type*) [CommGroup G'] :
Nonempty <| (G →* G') ≃* rootsOfUnity (Nat.card G) G' := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
exact ⟨monoidHomMulEquivRootsOfUnityOfGenerator hg G'⟩
end IsCyclic
end cyclic
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Basic.lean | 335 | 342 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
/-!
# The length function, reduced words, and descents
Throughout this file, `B` is a type and `M : CoxeterMatrix B` is a Coxeter matrix.
`cs : CoxeterSystem M W` is a Coxeter system; that is, `W` is a group, and `cs` holds the data
of a group isomorphism `W ≃* M.group`, where `M.group` refers to the quotient of the free group on
`B` by the Coxeter relations given by the matrix `M`. See `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean`
for more details.
Given any element $w \in W$, its *length* (`CoxeterSystem.length`), denoted $\ell(w)$, is the
minimum number $\ell$ such that $w$ can be written as a product of a sequence of $\ell$ simple
reflections:
$$w = s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell}.$$
We prove for all $w_1, w_2 \in W$ that $\ell (w_1 w_2) \leq \ell (w_1) + \ell (w_2)$
and that $\ell (w_1 w_2)$ has the same parity as $\ell (w_1) + \ell (w_2)$.
We define a *reduced word* (`CoxeterSystem.IsReduced`) for an element $w \in W$ to be a way of
writing $w$ as a product of exactly $\ell(w)$ simple reflections. Every element of $W$ has a reduced
word.
We say that $i \in B$ is a *left descent* (`CoxeterSystem.IsLeftDescent`) of $w \in W$ if
$\ell(s_i w) < \ell(w)$. We show that if $i$ is a left descent of $w$, then
$\ell(s_i w) + 1 = \ell(w)$. On the other hand, if $i$ is not a left descent of $w$, then
$\ell(s_i w) = \ell(w) + 1$. We similarly define right descents (`CoxeterSystem.IsRightDescent`) and
prove analogous results.
## Main definitions
* `cs.length`
* `cs.IsReduced`
* `cs.IsLeftDescent`
* `cs.IsRightDescent`
## References
* [A. Björner and F. Brenti, *Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups*](bjorner2005)
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CoxeterSystem
open List Matrix Function
variable {B : Type*}
variable {W : Type*} [Group W]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
/-! ### Length -/
private theorem exists_word_with_prod (w : W) : ∃ n ω, ω.length = n ∧ π ω = w := by
rcases cs.wordProd_surjective w with ⟨ω, rfl⟩
use ω.length, ω
open scoped Classical in
/-- The length of `w`; i.e., the minimum number of simple reflections that
must be multiplied to form `w`. -/
noncomputable def length (w : W) : ℕ := Nat.find (cs.exists_word_with_prod w)
local prefix:100 "ℓ" => cs.length
theorem exists_reduced_word (w : W) : ∃ ω, ω.length = ℓ w ∧ w = π ω := by
classical
have := Nat.find_spec (cs.exists_word_with_prod w)
tauto
open scoped Classical in
theorem length_wordProd_le (ω : List B) : ℓ (π ω) ≤ ω.length :=
Nat.find_min' (cs.exists_word_with_prod (π ω)) ⟨ω, by tauto⟩
@[simp] theorem length_one : ℓ (1 : W) = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (cs.length_wordProd_le [])
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {w : W} : ℓ w = 0 ↔ w = 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
have : ω = [] := eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (hω.trans h)
rw [this, wordProd_nil]
· rintro rfl
exact cs.length_one
@[simp]
theorem length_inv (w : W) : ℓ (w⁻¹) = ℓ w := by
apply Nat.le_antisymm
· rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
have := cs.length_wordProd_le (List.reverse ω)
rwa [wordProd_reverse, length_reverse, hω] at this
· rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w⁻¹ with ⟨ω, hω, h'ω⟩
have := cs.length_wordProd_le (List.reverse ω)
rwa [wordProd_reverse, length_reverse, ← h'ω, hω, inv_inv] at this
theorem length_mul_le (w₁ w₂ : W) :
ℓ (w₁ * w₂) ≤ ℓ w₁ + ℓ w₂ := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w₁ with ⟨ω₁, hω₁, rfl⟩
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w₂ with ⟨ω₂, hω₂, rfl⟩
have := cs.length_wordProd_le (ω₁ ++ ω₂)
simpa [hω₁, hω₂, wordProd_append] using this
theorem length_mul_ge_length_sub_length (w₁ w₂ : W) :
ℓ w₁ - ℓ w₂ ≤ ℓ (w₁ * w₂) := by
simpa [Nat.sub_le_of_le_add] using cs.length_mul_le (w₁ * w₂) w₂⁻¹
theorem length_mul_ge_length_sub_length' (w₁ w₂ : W) :
ℓ w₂ - ℓ w₁ ≤ ℓ (w₁ * w₂) := by
simpa [Nat.sub_le_of_le_add, add_comm] using cs.length_mul_le w₁⁻¹ (w₁ * w₂)
theorem length_mul_ge_max (w₁ w₂ : W) :
max (ℓ w₁ - ℓ w₂) (ℓ w₂ - ℓ w₁) ≤ ℓ (w₁ * w₂) :=
max_le_iff.mpr ⟨length_mul_ge_length_sub_length _ _ _, length_mul_ge_length_sub_length' _ _ _⟩
/-- The homomorphism that sends each element `w : W` to the parity of the length of `w`.
(See `lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length`.) -/
def lengthParity : W →* Multiplicative (ZMod 2) := cs.lift ⟨fun _ ↦ Multiplicative.ofAdd 1, by
simp_rw [CoxeterMatrix.IsLiftable, ← ofAdd_add, (by decide : (1 + 1 : ZMod 2) = 0)]
simp⟩
theorem lengthParity_simple (i : B) :
cs.lengthParity (s i) = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 := cs.lift_apply_simple _ _
theorem lengthParity_comp_simple :
cs.lengthParity ∘ cs.simple = fun _ ↦ Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 := funext cs.lengthParity_simple
theorem lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length (w : W) :
cs.lengthParity w = Multiplicative.ofAdd (↑(ℓ w)) := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
rw [← hω, wordProd, map_list_prod, List.map_map, lengthParity_comp_simple, map_const',
prod_replicate, ← ofAdd_nsmul, nsmul_one]
theorem length_mul_mod_two (w₁ w₂ : W) : ℓ (w₁ * w₂) % 2 = (ℓ w₁ + ℓ w₂) % 2 := by
rw [← ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff', Nat.cast_add]
simpa only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, ofAdd_add] using map_mul cs.lengthParity w₁ w₂
@[simp]
theorem length_simple (i : B) : ℓ (s i) = 1 := by
apply Nat.le_antisymm
· simpa using cs.length_wordProd_le [i]
· by_contra! length_lt_one
have : cs.lengthParity (s i) = Multiplicative.ofAdd 0 := by
rw [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, Nat.lt_one_iff.mp length_lt_one, Nat.cast_zero]
have : Multiplicative.ofAdd (0 : ZMod 2) = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 :=
this.symm.trans (cs.lengthParity_simple i)
contradiction
theorem length_eq_one_iff {w : W} : ℓ w = 1 ↔ ∃ i : B, w = s i := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
rcases List.length_eq_one_iff.mp (hω.trans h) with ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, cs.wordProd_singleton i⟩
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact cs.length_simple i
theorem length_mul_simple_ne (w : W) (i : B) : ℓ (w * s i) ≠ ℓ w := by
intro eq
have length_mod_two := cs.length_mul_mod_two w (s i)
rw [eq, length_simple] at length_mod_two
rcases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (ℓ w) with even | odd
· rw [even, Nat.succ_mod_two_eq_one_iff.mpr even] at length_mod_two
contradiction
· rw [odd, Nat.succ_mod_two_eq_zero_iff.mpr odd] at length_mod_two
contradiction
theorem length_simple_mul_ne (w : W) (i : B) : ℓ (s i * w) ≠ ℓ w := by
convert cs.length_mul_simple_ne w⁻¹ i using 1
· convert cs.length_inv ?_ using 2
simp
· simp
theorem length_mul_simple (w : W) (i : B) :
ℓ (w * s i) = ℓ w + 1 ∨ ℓ (w * s i) + 1 = ℓ w := by
rcases Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne (cs.length_mul_simple_ne w i) with lt | gt
· -- lt : ℓ (w * s i) < ℓ w
right
have length_ge := cs.length_mul_ge_length_sub_length w (s i)
simp only [length_simple, tsub_le_iff_right] at length_ge
-- length_ge : ℓ w ≤ ℓ (w * s i) + 1
omega
· -- gt : ℓ w < ℓ (w * s i)
left
have length_le := cs.length_mul_le w (s i)
simp only [length_simple] at length_le
-- length_le : ℓ (w * s i) ≤ ℓ w + 1
omega
theorem length_simple_mul (w : W) (i : B) :
ℓ (s i * w) = ℓ w + 1 ∨ ℓ (s i * w) + 1 = ℓ w := by
have := cs.length_mul_simple w⁻¹ i
rwa [(by simp : w⁻¹ * (s i) = ((s i) * w)⁻¹), length_inv, length_inv] at this
/-! ### Reduced words -/
/-- The proposition that `ω` is reduced; that is, it has minimal length among all words that
represent the same element of `W`. -/
def IsReduced (ω : List B) : Prop := ℓ (π ω) = ω.length
@[simp]
theorem isReduced_reverse_iff (ω : List B) : cs.IsReduced (ω.reverse) ↔ cs.IsReduced ω := by
simp [IsReduced]
theorem IsReduced.reverse {cs : CoxeterSystem M W} {ω : List B}
(hω : cs.IsReduced ω) : cs.IsReduced (ω.reverse) :=
(cs.isReduced_reverse_iff ω).mpr hω
theorem exists_reduced_word' (w : W) : ∃ ω : List B, cs.IsReduced ω ∧ w = π ω := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, hω, rfl⟩
use ω
tauto
private theorem isReduced_take_and_drop {ω : List B} (hω : cs.IsReduced ω) (j : ℕ) :
cs.IsReduced (ω.take j) ∧ cs.IsReduced (ω.drop j) := by
have h₁ : ℓ (π (ω.take j)) ≤ (ω.take j).length := cs.length_wordProd_le (ω.take j)
have h₂ : ℓ (π (ω.drop j)) ≤ (ω.drop j).length := cs.length_wordProd_le (ω.drop j)
have h₃ := calc
(ω.take j).length + (ω.drop j).length
_ = ω.length := by rw [← List.length_append, ω.take_append_drop j]
_ = ℓ (π ω) := hω.symm
_ = ℓ (π (ω.take j) * π (ω.drop j)) := by rw [← cs.wordProd_append, ω.take_append_drop j]
_ ≤ ℓ (π (ω.take j)) + ℓ (π (ω.drop j)) := cs.length_mul_le _ _
unfold IsReduced
omega
theorem IsReduced.take {cs : CoxeterSystem M W} {ω : List B} (hω : cs.IsReduced ω) (j : ℕ) :
cs.IsReduced (ω.take j) :=
(isReduced_take_and_drop _ hω _).1
theorem IsReduced.drop {cs : CoxeterSystem M W} {ω : List B} (hω : cs.IsReduced ω) (j : ℕ) :
cs.IsReduced (ω.drop j) :=
(isReduced_take_and_drop _ hω _).2
theorem not_isReduced_alternatingWord (i i' : B) {m : ℕ} (hM : M i i' ≠ 0) (hm : m > M i i') :
¬cs.IsReduced (alternatingWord i i' m) := by
induction' hm with m _ ih
· -- Base case; m = M i i' + 1
suffices h : ℓ (π (alternatingWord i i' (M i i' + 1))) < M i i' + 1 by
unfold IsReduced
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, length_alternatingWord]
omega
have : M i i' + 1 ≤ M i i' * 2 := by linarith [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hM]
rw [cs.prod_alternatingWord_eq_prod_alternatingWord_sub i i' _ this]
have : M i i' * 2 - (M i i' + 1) = M i i' - 1 := by omega
rw [this]
calc
ℓ (π (alternatingWord i' i (M i i' - 1)))
_ ≤ (alternatingWord i' i (M i i' - 1)).length := cs.length_wordProd_le _
_ = M i i' - 1 := length_alternatingWord _ _ _
_ ≤ M i i' := Nat.sub_le _ _
_ < M i i' + 1 := Nat.lt_succ_self _
· -- Inductive step
contrapose! ih
rw [alternatingWord_succ'] at ih
apply IsReduced.drop (j := 1) at ih
simpa using ih
/-! ### Descents -/
/-- The proposition that `i` is a left descent of `w`; that is, $\ell(s_i w) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsLeftDescent (w : W) (i : B) : Prop := ℓ (s i * w) < ℓ w
/-- The proposition that `i` is a right descent of `w`; that is, $\ell(w s_i) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsRightDescent (w : W) (i : B) : Prop := ℓ (w * s i) < ℓ w
theorem not_isLeftDescent_one (i : B) : ¬cs.IsLeftDescent 1 i := by simp [IsLeftDescent]
theorem not_isRightDescent_one (i : B) : ¬cs.IsRightDescent 1 i := by simp [IsRightDescent]
theorem isLeftDescent_inv_iff {w : W} {i : B} :
cs.IsLeftDescent w⁻¹ i ↔ cs.IsRightDescent w i := by
unfold IsLeftDescent IsRightDescent
nth_rw 1 [← length_inv]
simp
theorem isRightDescent_inv_iff {w : W} {i : B} :
cs.IsRightDescent w⁻¹ i ↔ cs.IsLeftDescent w i := by
simpa using (cs.isLeftDescent_inv_iff (w := w⁻¹)).symm
theorem exists_leftDescent_of_ne_one {w : W} (hw : w ≠ 1) : ∃ i : B, cs.IsLeftDescent w i := by
rcases cs.exists_reduced_word w with ⟨ω, h, rfl⟩
have h₁ : ω ≠ [] := by rintro rfl; simp at hw
rcases List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil h₁ with ⟨i, ω', rfl⟩
use i
rw [IsLeftDescent, ← h, wordProd_cons, simple_mul_simple_cancel_left]
calc
ℓ (π ω') ≤ ω'.length := cs.length_wordProd_le ω'
_ < (i :: ω').length := by simp
theorem exists_rightDescent_of_ne_one {w : W} (hw : w ≠ 1) : ∃ i : B, cs.IsRightDescent w i := by
simp only [← isLeftDescent_inv_iff]
apply exists_leftDescent_of_ne_one
simpa
theorem isLeftDescent_iff {w : W} {i : B} :
cs.IsLeftDescent w i ↔ ℓ (s i * w) + 1 = ℓ w := by
unfold IsLeftDescent
constructor
· intro _
exact (cs.length_simple_mul w i).resolve_left (by omega)
· omega
| theorem not_isLeftDescent_iff {w : W} {i : B} :
¬cs.IsLeftDescent w i ↔ ℓ (s i * w) = ℓ w + 1 := by
unfold IsLeftDescent
constructor
· intro _
exact (cs.length_simple_mul w i).resolve_right (by omega)
· omega
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Length.lean | 314 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
/-!
# Gaussian integers
The Gaussian integers are complex integer, complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are both
integers.
## Main definitions
The Euclidean domain structure on `ℤ[i]` is defined in this file.
The homomorphism `GaussianInt.toComplex` into the complex numbers is also defined in this file.
## See also
See `NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.QuadraticReciprocity` for:
* `prime_iff_mod_four_eq_three_of_nat_prime`:
A prime natural number is prime in `ℤ[i]` if and only if it is `3` mod `4`
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `ℤ[i]` for `GaussianInt`
## Implementation notes
Gaussian integers are implemented using the more general definition `Zsqrtd`, the type of integers
adjoined a square root of `d`, in this case `-1`. The definition is reducible, so that properties
and definitions about `Zsqrtd` can easily be used.
-/
open Zsqrtd Complex
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The Gaussian integers, defined as `ℤ√(-1)`. -/
abbrev GaussianInt : Type :=
Zsqrtd (-1)
local notation "ℤ[i]" => GaussianInt
namespace GaussianInt
instance : Repr ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x _ => "⟨" ++ repr x.re ++ ", " ++ repr x.im ++ "⟩"⟩
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ[i] :=
Zsqrtd.commRing
section
attribute [-instance] Complex.instField -- Avoid making things noncomputable unnecessarily.
/-- The embedding of the Gaussian integers into the complex numbers, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def toComplex : ℤ[i] →+* ℂ :=
Zsqrtd.lift ⟨I, by simp⟩
end
instance : Coe ℤ[i] ℂ :=
⟨toComplex⟩
theorem toComplex_def (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = x.re + x.im * I :=
rfl
theorem toComplex_def' (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y * I := by simp [toComplex_def]
theorem toComplex_def₂ (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = ⟨x.re, x.im⟩ := by
apply Complex.ext <;> simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem to_real_re (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.re : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).re := by simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem to_real_im (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.im : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).im := by simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_re (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re = x := by simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_im (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im = y := by simp [toComplex_def]
theorem toComplex_add (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x + y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y :=
toComplex.map_add _ _
theorem toComplex_mul (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x * y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x * y :=
toComplex.map_mul _ _
theorem toComplex_one : ((1 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 1 :=
toComplex.map_one
theorem toComplex_zero : ((0 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 0 :=
toComplex.map_zero
theorem toComplex_neg (x : ℤ[i]) : ((-x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = -x :=
toComplex.map_neg _
theorem toComplex_sub (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x - y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x - y :=
toComplex.map_sub _ _
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_star (x : ℤ[i]) : ((star x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = conj (x : ℂ) := by
rw [toComplex_def₂, toComplex_def₂]
exact congr_arg₂ _ rfl (Int.cast_neg _)
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_inj {x y : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = y ↔ x = y := by
cases x; cases y; simp [toComplex_def₂]
lemma toComplex_injective : Function.Injective GaussianInt.toComplex :=
fun ⦃_ _⦄ ↦ toComplex_inj.mp
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← toComplex_zero, toComplex_inj]
@[simp]
theorem intCast_real_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm : ℝ) = Complex.normSq (x : ℂ) := by
rw [Zsqrtd.norm, normSq]; simp
@[simp]
theorem intCast_complex_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm : ℂ) = Complex.normSq (x : ℂ) := by
cases x; rw [Zsqrtd.norm, normSq]; simp
theorem norm_nonneg (x : ℤ[i]) : 0 ≤ norm x :=
Zsqrtd.norm_nonneg (by norm_num) _
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : norm x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← @Int.cast_inj ℝ _ _ _]; simp
theorem norm_pos {x : ℤ[i]} : 0 < norm x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm, norm_eq_zero]; simp [norm_nonneg]
theorem abs_natCast_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm.natAbs : ℤ) = x.norm :=
Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_natAbs_norm {α : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] (x : ℤ[i]) :
(x.norm.natAbs : α) = x.norm := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, abs_natCast_norm]
theorem natAbs_norm_eq (x : ℤ[i]) :
x.norm.natAbs = x.re.natAbs * x.re.natAbs + x.im.natAbs * x.im.natAbs :=
Int.ofNat.inj <| by simp; simp [Zsqrtd.norm]
instance : Div ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x y =>
let n := (norm y : ℚ)⁻¹
let c := star y
⟨round ((x * c).re * n : ℚ), round ((x * c).im * n : ℚ)⟩⟩
theorem div_def (x y : ℤ[i]) :
x / y = ⟨round ((x * star y).re / norm y : ℚ), round ((x * star y).im / norm y : ℚ)⟩ :=
show Zsqrtd.mk _ _ = _ by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem toComplex_div_re (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re = round (x / y : ℂ).re := by
rw [div_def, ← @Rat.round_cast ℝ _ _]
simp [-Rat.round_cast, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_add, add_mul]
theorem toComplex_div_im (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im = round (x / y : ℂ).im := by
rw [div_def, ← @Rat.round_cast ℝ _ _, ← @Rat.round_cast ℝ _ _]
simp [-Rat.round_cast, mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_add, add_mul]
theorem normSq_le_normSq_of_re_le_of_im_le {x y : ℂ} (hre : |x.re| ≤ |y.re|)
(him : |x.im| ≤ |y.im|) : Complex.normSq x ≤ Complex.normSq y := by
rw [normSq_apply, normSq_apply, ← _root_.abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul, ←
_root_.abs_mul_self y.re, _root_.abs_mul y.re, ← _root_.abs_mul_self x.im,
_root_.abs_mul x.im, ← _root_.abs_mul_self y.im, _root_.abs_mul y.im]
exact
add_le_add (mul_self_le_mul_self (abs_nonneg _) hre) (mul_self_le_mul_self (abs_nonneg _) him)
theorem normSq_div_sub_div_lt_one (x y : ℤ[i]) :
Complex.normSq ((x / y : ℂ) - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ)) < 1 :=
calc
Complex.normSq ((x / y : ℂ) - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ))
_ = Complex.normSq
((x / y : ℂ).re - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re + ((x / y : ℂ).im - ((x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im) *
I : ℂ) :=
congr_arg _ <| by apply Complex.ext <;> simp
_ ≤ Complex.normSq (1 / 2 + 1 / 2 * I) := by
have : |(2⁻¹ : ℝ)| = 2⁻¹ := abs_of_nonneg (by norm_num)
exact normSq_le_normSq_of_re_le_of_im_le
(by rw [toComplex_div_re]; simp [normSq, this]; simpa using abs_sub_round (x / y : ℂ).re)
(by rw [toComplex_div_im]; simp [normSq, this]; simpa using abs_sub_round (x / y : ℂ).im)
_ < 1 := by simp [normSq]; norm_num
instance : Mod ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x y => x - y * (x / y)⟩
theorem mod_def (x y : ℤ[i]) : x % y = x - y * (x / y) :=
rfl
theorem norm_mod_lt (x : ℤ[i]) {y : ℤ[i]} (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x % y).norm < y.norm :=
have : (y : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← toComplex_zero, toComplex_inj]
(@Int.cast_lt ℝ _ _ _ _).1 <|
calc
↑(Zsqrtd.norm (x % y)) = Complex.normSq (x - y * (x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) := by simp [mod_def]
_ = Complex.normSq (y : ℂ) * Complex.normSq (x / y - (x / y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) := by
rw [← normSq_mul, mul_sub, mul_div_cancel₀ _ this]
_ < Complex.normSq (y : ℂ) * 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (normSq_div_sub_div_lt_one _ _) (normSq_pos.2 this))
_ = Zsqrtd.norm y := by simp
theorem natAbs_norm_mod_lt (x : ℤ[i]) {y : ℤ[i]} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(x % y).norm.natAbs < y.norm.natAbs :=
Int.ofNat_lt.1 (by simp [-Int.ofNat_lt, norm_mod_lt x hy])
theorem norm_le_norm_mul_left (x : ℤ[i]) {y : ℤ[i]} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(norm x).natAbs ≤ (norm (x * y)).natAbs := by
rw [Zsqrtd.norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul]
exact le_mul_of_one_le_right (Nat.zero_le _) (Int.ofNat_le.1 (by
rw [abs_natCast_norm]
exact Int.add_one_le_of_lt (norm_pos.2 hy)))
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℤ[i] :=
⟨⟨0, 1, by decide⟩⟩
instance : EuclideanDomain ℤ[i] :=
{ GaussianInt.instCommRing,
GaussianInt.instNontrivial with
quotient := (· / ·)
remainder := (· % ·)
quotient_zero := by simp [div_def]; rfl
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq := fun _ _ => by simp [mod_def]
r := _
r_wellFounded := (measure (Int.natAbs ∘ norm)).wf
remainder_lt := natAbs_norm_mod_lt
mul_left_not_lt := fun a _ hb0 => not_lt_of_ge <| norm_le_norm_mul_left a hb0 }
open PrincipalIdealRing
theorem sq_add_sq_of_nat_prime_of_not_irreducible (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(hpi : ¬Irreducible (p : ℤ[i])) : ∃ a b, a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 = p :=
have hpu : ¬IsUnit (p : ℤ[i]) :=
mt norm_eq_one_iff.2 <| by
rw [norm_natCast, Int.natAbs_mul, mul_eq_one]
exact fun h => (ne_of_lt hp.1.one_lt).symm h.1
have hab : ∃ a b, (p : ℤ[i]) = a * b ∧ ¬IsUnit a ∧ ¬IsUnit b := by
simpa [irreducible_iff, hpu, not_forall, not_or] using hpi
let ⟨a, b, hpab, hau, hbu⟩ := hab
have hnap : (norm a).natAbs = p :=
((hp.1.mul_eq_prime_sq_iff (mt norm_eq_one_iff.1 hau) (mt norm_eq_one_iff.1 hbu)).1 <| by
rw [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natCast_pow, sq, ← @norm_natCast (-1), hpab]; simp).1
⟨a.re.natAbs, a.im.natAbs, by simpa [natAbs_norm_eq, sq] using hnap⟩
end GaussianInt
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/GaussianInt.lean | 265 | 267 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.Structures
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.BumpFunction
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.PartitionOfUnity
import Mathlib.Topology.ShrinkingLemma
/-!
# Smooth partition of unity
In this file we define two structures, `SmoothBumpCovering` and `SmoothPartitionOfUnity`. Both
structures describe coverings of a set by a locally finite family of supports of smooth functions
with some additional properties. The former structure is mostly useful as an intermediate step in
the construction of a smooth partition of unity but some proofs that traditionally deal with a
partition of unity can use a `SmoothBumpCovering` as well.
Given a real manifold `M` and its subset `s`, a `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` is a collection of
`SmoothBumpFunction`s `f i` indexed by `i : ι` such that
* the center of each `f i` belongs to `s`;
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, there exists `i : ι` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`.
In the same settings, a `SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s` is a collection of smooth nonnegative
functions `f i : C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯`, `i : ι`, such that
* the family of sets `support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each `x ∈ s`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for each `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one.
We say that `f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → Set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
We prove that on a smooth finitely dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology,
for any `U : M → Set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. Then we use this fact to prove a similar statement about smooth partitions of
unity, see `SmoothPartitionOfUnity.exists_isSubordinate`.
Finally, we use existence of a partition of unity to prove lemma
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` that allows us to construct a globally defined smooth
function from local functions.
## TODO
* Build a framework for to transfer local definitions to global using partition of unity and use it
to define, e.g., the integral of a differential form over a manifold. Lemma
`exists_smooth_forall_mem_convex_of_local` is a first step in this direction.
## Tags
smooth bump function, partition of unity
-/
universe uι uE uH uM uF
open Function Filter Module Set
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
noncomputable section
variable {ι : Type uι} {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {H : Type uH}
[TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H) {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M]
/-!
### Covering by supports of smooth bump functions
In this section we define `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` to be a collection of
`SmoothBumpFunction`s such that their supports is a locally finite family of sets and for each
`x ∈ s` some function `f i` from the collection is equal to `1` in a neighborhood of `x`. A covering
of this type is useful to construct a smooth partition of unity and can be used instead of a
partition of unity in some proofs.
We prove that on a smooth finite dimensional real manifold with `σ`-compact Hausdorff topology, for
any `U : M → Set M` such that `∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x` there exists a `SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s`
subordinate to `U`. -/
variable (ι M)
/-- We say that a collection of `SmoothBumpFunction`s is a `SmoothBumpCovering` of a set `s` if
* `(f i).c ∈ s` for all `i`;
* the family `fun i ↦ support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for each point `x ∈ s` there exists `i` such that `f i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`;
in other words, `x` belongs to the interior of `{y | f i y = 1}`;
If `M` is a finite dimensional real manifold which is a `σ`-compact Hausdorff topological space,
then for every covering `U : M → Set M`, `∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x`, there exists a `SmoothBumpCovering`
subordinate to `U`, see `SmoothBumpCovering.exists_isSubordinate`.
This covering can be used, e.g., to construct a partition of unity and to prove the weak
Whitney embedding theorem. -/
structure SmoothBumpCovering [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (s : Set M := univ) where
/-- The center point of each bump in the smooth covering. -/
c : ι → M
/-- A smooth bump function around `c i`. -/
toFun : ∀ i, SmoothBumpFunction I (c i)
/-- All the bump functions in the covering are centered at points in `s`. -/
c_mem' : ∀ i, c i ∈ s
/-- Around each point, there are only finitely many nonzero bump functions in the family. -/
locallyFinite' : LocallyFinite fun i => support (toFun i)
/-- Around each point in `s`, one of the bump functions is equal to `1`. -/
eventuallyEq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, toFun i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1
/-- We say that a collection of functions form a smooth partition of unity on a set `s` if
* all functions are infinitely smooth and nonnegative;
* the family `fun i ↦ support (f i)` is locally finite;
* for all `x ∈ s` the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` equals one;
* for all `x`, the sum `∑ᶠ i, f i x` is less than or equal to one. -/
structure SmoothPartitionOfUnity (s : Set M := univ) where
/-- The family of functions forming the partition of unity. -/
toFun : ι → C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯
/-- Around each point, there are only finitely many nonzero functions in the family. -/
locallyFinite' : LocallyFinite fun i => support (toFun i)
/-- All the functions in the partition of unity are nonnegative. -/
nonneg' : ∀ i x, 0 ≤ toFun i x
/-- The functions in the partition of unity add up to `1` at any point of `s`. -/
sum_eq_one' : ∀ x ∈ s, ∑ᶠ i, toFun i x = 1
/-- The functions in the partition of unity add up to at most `1` everywhere. -/
sum_le_one' : ∀ x, ∑ᶠ i, toFun i x ≤ 1
variable {ι I M}
namespace SmoothPartitionOfUnity
variable {s : Set M} (f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) {n : ℕ∞}
instance {s : Set M} : FunLike (SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) ι C^∞⟮I, M; 𝓘(ℝ), ℝ⟯ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
protected theorem locallyFinite : LocallyFinite fun i => support (f i) :=
f.locallyFinite'
theorem nonneg (i : ι) (x : M) : 0 ≤ f i x :=
f.nonneg' i x
theorem sum_eq_one {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x = 1 :=
f.sum_eq_one' x hx
theorem exists_pos_of_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : ∃ i, 0 < f i x := by
by_contra! h
have H : ∀ i, f i x = 0 := fun i ↦ le_antisymm (h i) (f.nonneg i x)
have := f.sum_eq_one hx
simp_rw [H] at this
simpa
theorem sum_le_one (x : M) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x ≤ 1 :=
f.sum_le_one' x
/-- Reinterpret a smooth partition of unity as a continuous partition of unity. -/
@[simps]
def toPartitionOfUnity : PartitionOfUnity ι M s :=
{ f with toFun := fun i => f i }
theorem contMDiff_sum : ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ fun x => ∑ᶠ i, f i x :=
contMDiff_finsum (fun i => (f i).contMDiff) f.locallyFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_sum := contMDiff_sum
theorem le_one (i : ι) (x : M) : f i x ≤ 1 :=
f.toPartitionOfUnity.le_one i x
theorem sum_nonneg (x : M) : 0 ≤ ∑ᶠ i, f i x :=
f.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_nonneg x
theorem finsum_smul_mem_convex {g : ι → M → F} {t : Set F} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hg : ∀ i, f i x ≠ 0 → g i x ∈ t) (ht : Convex ℝ t) : ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x ∈ t :=
ht.finsum_mem (fun _ => f.nonneg _ _) (f.sum_eq_one hx) hg
theorem contMDiff_smul {g : M → F} {i} (hg : ∀ x ∈ tsupport (f i), ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n g x) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n fun x => f i x • g x :=
contMDiff_of_tsupport fun x hx =>
((f i).contMDiff.contMDiffAt.of_le (mod_cast le_top)).smul <| hg x
<| tsupport_smul_subset_left _ _ hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_smul := contMDiff_smul
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : Set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of
functions such that `g i` is $C^n$ smooth at every point of the topological support of `f i`, then
the sum `fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
theorem contMDiff_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F}
(hg : ∀ (i), ∀ x ∈ tsupport (f i), ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) x) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n fun x => ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x :=
(contMDiff_finsum fun i => f.contMDiff_smul (hg i)) <|
f.locallyFinite.subset fun _ => support_smul_subset_left _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_finsum_smul := contMDiff_finsum_smul
theorem contMDiffAt_finsum {x₀ : M} {g : ι → M → F}
(hφ : ∀ i, x₀ ∈ tsupport (f i) → ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) x₀) :
ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) x₀ := by
refine _root_.contMDiffAt_finsum (f.locallyFinite.smul_left _) fun i ↦ ?_
by_cases hx : x₀ ∈ tsupport (f i)
· exact ContMDiffAt.smul ((f i).contMDiff.of_le (mod_cast le_top)).contMDiffAt (hφ i hx)
· exact contMDiffAt_of_not_mem (compl_subset_compl.mpr
(tsupport_smul_subset_left (f i) (g i)) hx) n
theorem contDiffAt_finsum {s : Set E} (f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι 𝓘(ℝ, E) E s) {x₀ : E}
{g : ι → E → F} (hφ : ∀ i, x₀ ∈ tsupport (f i) → ContDiffAt ℝ n (g i) x₀) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x) x₀ := by
simp only [← contMDiffAt_iff_contDiffAt] at *
exact f.contMDiffAt_finsum hφ
section finsupport
variable {s : Set M} (ρ : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) (x₀ : M)
/-- The support of a smooth partition of unity at a point `x₀` as a `Finset`.
This is the set of `i : ι` such that `x₀ ∈ support f i`, i.e. `f i ≠ x₀`. -/
def finsupport : Finset ι := ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.finsupport x₀
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsupport {i : ι} : i ∈ ρ.finsupport x₀ ↔ i ∈ support fun i ↦ ρ i x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.mem_finsupport x₀
@[simp]
theorem coe_finsupport : (ρ.finsupport x₀ : Set ι) = support fun i ↦ ρ i x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.coe_finsupport x₀
theorem sum_finsupport (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) : ∑ i ∈ ρ.finsupport x₀, ρ i x₀ = 1 :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_finsupport hx₀
theorem sum_finsupport' (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) {I : Finset ι} (hI : ρ.finsupport x₀ ⊆ I) :
∑ i ∈ I, ρ i x₀ = 1 :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_finsupport' hx₀ hI
theorem sum_finsupport_smul_eq_finsum {A : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [Module ℝ A] (φ : ι → M → A) :
∑ i ∈ ρ.finsupport x₀, ρ i x₀ • φ i x₀ = ∑ᶠ i, ρ i x₀ • φ i x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.sum_finsupport_smul_eq_finsum φ
end finsupport
section fintsupport -- smooth partitions of unity have locally finite `tsupport`
variable {s : Set M} (ρ : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) (x₀ : M)
/-- The `tsupport`s of a smooth partition of unity are locally finite. -/
theorem finite_tsupport : {i | x₀ ∈ tsupport (ρ i)}.Finite :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.finite_tsupport _
/-- The tsupport of a partition of unity at a point `x₀` as a `Finset`.
This is the set of `i : ι` such that `x₀ ∈ tsupport f i`. -/
def fintsupport (x : M) : Finset ι :=
(ρ.finite_tsupport x).toFinset
theorem mem_fintsupport_iff (i : ι) : i ∈ ρ.fintsupport x₀ ↔ x₀ ∈ tsupport (ρ i) :=
Finite.mem_toFinset _
theorem eventually_fintsupport_subset : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x₀, ρ.fintsupport y ⊆ ρ.fintsupport x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.eventually_fintsupport_subset _
theorem finsupport_subset_fintsupport : ρ.finsupport x₀ ⊆ ρ.fintsupport x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.finsupport_subset_fintsupport x₀
theorem eventually_finsupport_subset : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x₀, ρ.finsupport y ⊆ ρ.fintsupport x₀ :=
ρ.toPartitionOfUnity.eventually_finsupport_subset x₀
end fintsupport
section IsSubordinate
/-- A smooth partition of unity `f i` is subordinate to a family of sets `U i` indexed by the same
type if for each `i` the closure of the support of `f i` is a subset of `U i`. -/
def IsSubordinate (f : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s) (U : ι → Set M) :=
∀ i, tsupport (f i) ⊆ U i
variable {f}
variable {U : ι → Set M}
@[simp]
theorem isSubordinate_toPartitionOfUnity :
f.toPartitionOfUnity.IsSubordinate U ↔ f.IsSubordinate U :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsSubordinate.toPartitionOfUnity⟩ := isSubordinate_toPartitionOfUnity
/-- If `f` is a smooth partition of unity on a set `s : Set M` subordinate to a family of open sets
`U : ι → Set M` and `g : ι → M → F` is a family of functions such that `g i` is $C^n$ smooth on
`U i`, then the sum `fun x ↦ ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x` is $C^n$ smooth on the whole manifold. -/
theorem IsSubordinate.contMDiff_finsum_smul {g : ι → M → F} (hf : f.IsSubordinate U)
(ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hg : ∀ i, ContMDiffOn I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n (g i) (U i)) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, F) n fun x => ∑ᶠ i, f i x • g i x :=
f.contMDiff_finsum_smul fun i _ hx => (hg i).contMDiffAt <| (ho i).mem_nhds (hf i hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")]
alias IsSubordinate.smooth_finsum_smul := IsSubordinate.contMDiff_finsum_smul
end IsSubordinate
end SmoothPartitionOfUnity
namespace BumpCovering
-- Repeat variables to drop `[FiniteDimensional ℝ E]` and `[IsManifold I ∞ M]`
theorem contMDiff_toPartitionOfUnity {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {M : Type uM}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {s : Set M} (f : BumpCovering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) (i : ι) : ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f.toPartitionOfUnity i) :=
(hf i).mul <| (contMDiff_finprod_cond fun j _ => contMDiff_const.sub (hf j)) <| by
simp only [Pi.sub_def, mulSupport_one_sub]
exact f.locallyFinite
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")]
alias smooth_toPartitionOfUnity := contMDiff_toPartitionOfUnity
variable {s : Set M}
/-- A `BumpCovering` such that all functions in this covering are smooth generates a smooth
partition of unity.
In our formalization, not every `f : BumpCovering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a
`SmoothBumpCovering`; instead, a `SmoothBumpCovering` is a covering by supports of
`SmoothBumpFunction`s. So, we define `BumpCovering.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity`, then reuse it
in `SmoothBumpCovering.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity`. -/
def toSmoothPartitionOfUnity (f : BumpCovering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) :
SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s :=
{ f.toPartitionOfUnity with
toFun := fun i => ⟨f.toPartitionOfUnity i, f.contMDiff_toPartitionOfUnity hf i⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem toSmoothPartitionOfUnity_toPartitionOfUnity (f : BumpCovering ι M s)
(hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) :
(f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf).toPartitionOfUnity = f.toPartitionOfUnity :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSmoothPartitionOfUnity (f : BumpCovering ι M s) (hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i))
(i : ι) : ⇑(f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf i) = f.toPartitionOfUnity i :=
rfl
theorem IsSubordinate.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity {f : BumpCovering ι M s} {U : ι → Set M}
(h : f.IsSubordinate U) (hf : ∀ i, ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ (f i)) :
(f.toSmoothPartitionOfUnity hf).IsSubordinate U :=
h.toPartitionOfUnity
end BumpCovering
namespace SmoothBumpCovering
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable {s : Set M} {U : M → Set M} (fs : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s)
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s) fun x => ∀ i : ι, SmoothBumpFunction I (x.c i) :=
⟨toFun⟩
/--
We say that `f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s` is *subordinate* to a map `U : M → Set M` if for each
index `i`, we have `tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f i).c`. This notion is a bit more general than
being subordinate to an open covering of `M`, because we make no assumption about the way `U x`
depends on `x`.
-/
def IsSubordinate {s : Set M} (f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s) (U : M → Set M) :=
∀ i, tsupport (f i) ⊆ U (f.c i)
theorem IsSubordinate.support_subset {fs : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s} {U : M → Set M}
(h : fs.IsSubordinate U) (i : ι) : support (fs i) ⊆ U (fs.c i) :=
Subset.trans subset_closure (h i)
variable (I) in
/-- Let `M` be a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional real vector space.
Suppose also that `M` is a Hausdorff `σ`-compact topological space. Let `s` be a closed set
in `M` and `U : M → Set M` be a collection of sets such that `U x ∈ 𝓝 x` for every `x ∈ s`.
Then there exists a smooth bump covering of `s` that is subordinate to `U`. -/
theorem exists_isSubordinate [T2Space M] [SigmaCompactSpace M] (hs : IsClosed s)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ (ι : Type uM) (f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s), f.IsSubordinate U := by
-- First we deduce some missing instances
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace H := I.locallyCompactSpace
haveI : LocallyCompactSpace M := ChartedSpace.locallyCompactSpace H M
-- Next we choose a covering by supports of smooth bump functions
have hB := fun x hx => SmoothBumpFunction.nhds_basis_support (I := I) (hU x hx)
rcases refinement_of_locallyCompact_sigmaCompact_of_nhds_basis_set hs hB with
⟨ι, c, f, hf, hsub', hfin⟩
choose hcs hfU using hf
-- Then we use the shrinking lemma to get a covering by smaller open
rcases exists_subset_iUnion_closed_subset hs (fun i => (f i).isOpen_support)
(fun x _ => hfin.point_finite x) hsub' with ⟨V, hsV, hVc, hVf⟩
choose r hrR hr using fun i => (f i).exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball (hVc i) (hVf i)
refine ⟨ι, ⟨c, fun i => (f i).updateRIn (r i) (hrR i), hcs, ?_, fun x hx => ?_⟩, fun i => ?_⟩
· simpa only [SmoothBumpFunction.support_updateRIn]
· refine (mem_iUnion.1 <| hsV hx).imp fun i hi => ?_
exact ((f i).updateRIn _ _).eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt
((f i).support_subset_source <| hVf _ hi) (hr i hi).2
· simpa only [SmoothBumpFunction.support_updateRIn, tsupport] using hfU i
protected theorem locallyFinite : LocallyFinite fun i => support (fs i) :=
fs.locallyFinite'
protected theorem point_finite (x : M) : {i | fs i x ≠ 0}.Finite :=
fs.locallyFinite.point_finite x
/-- Index of a bump function such that `fs i =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1`. -/
def ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : ι :=
(fs.eventuallyEq_one' x hx).choose
theorem eventuallyEq_one (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 :=
(fs.eventuallyEq_one' x hx).choose_spec
theorem apply_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : fs (fs.ind x hx) x = 1 :=
(fs.eventuallyEq_one x hx).eq_of_nhds
theorem mem_support_ind (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : x ∈ support (fs <| fs.ind x hx) := by
simp [fs.apply_ind x hx]
theorem mem_chartAt_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (chartAt H (fs.c i)).source :=
(fs i).support_subset_source <| by simp [h]
theorem mem_extChartAt_source_of_eq_one {i : ι} {x : M} (h : fs i x = 1) :
x ∈ (extChartAt I (fs.c i)).source := by
rw [extChartAt_source]; exact fs.mem_chartAt_source_of_eq_one h
theorem mem_chartAt_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) : x ∈ (chartAt H (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_chartAt_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
theorem mem_extChartAt_ind_source (x : M) (hx : x ∈ s) :
x ∈ (extChartAt I (fs.c (fs.ind x hx))).source :=
fs.mem_extChartAt_source_of_eq_one (fs.apply_ind x hx)
/-- The index type of a `SmoothBumpCovering` of a compact manifold is finite. -/
protected def fintype [CompactSpace M] : Fintype ι :=
fs.locallyFinite.fintypeOfCompact fun i => (fs i).nonempty_support
variable [T2Space M]
variable [IsManifold I ∞ M]
/-- Reinterpret a `SmoothBumpCovering` as a continuous `BumpCovering`. Note that not every
`f : BumpCovering ι M s` with smooth functions `f i` is a `SmoothBumpCovering`. -/
def toBumpCovering : BumpCovering ι M s where
toFun i := ⟨fs i, (fs i).continuous⟩
locallyFinite' := fs.locallyFinite
nonneg' i _ := (fs i).nonneg
le_one' i _ := (fs i).le_one
eventuallyEq_one' := fs.eventuallyEq_one'
@[simp]
theorem isSubordinate_toBumpCovering {f : SmoothBumpCovering ι I M s} {U : M → Set M} :
(f.toBumpCovering.IsSubordinate fun i => U (f.c i)) ↔ f.IsSubordinate U :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsSubordinate.toBumpCovering⟩ := isSubordinate_toBumpCovering
|
/-- Every `SmoothBumpCovering` defines a smooth partition of unity. -/
def toSmoothPartitionOfUnity : SmoothPartitionOfUnity ι I M s :=
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/PartitionOfUnity.lean | 448 | 450 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Inner product space derived from a norm
This file defines an `InnerProductSpace` instance from a norm that respects the
parallellogram identity. The parallelogram identity is a way to express the inner product of `x` and
`y` in terms of the norms of `x`, `y`, `x + y`, `x - y`.
## Main results
- `InnerProductSpace.ofNorm`: a normed space whose norm respects the parallellogram identity,
can be seen as an inner product space.
## Implementation notes
We define `inner_`
$$\langle x, y \rangle := \frac{1}{4} (‖x + y‖^2 - ‖x - y‖^2 + i ‖ix + y‖ ^ 2 - i ‖ix - y‖^2)$$
and use the parallelogram identity
$$‖x + y‖^2 + ‖x - y‖^2 = 2 (‖x‖^2 + ‖y‖^2)$$
to prove it is an inner product, i.e., that it is conjugate-symmetric (`inner_.conj_symm`) and
linear in the first argument. `add_left` is proved by judicious application of the parallelogram
identity followed by tedious arithmetic. `smul_left` is proved step by step, first noting that
$\langle λ x, y \rangle = λ \langle x, y \rangle$ for $λ ∈ ℕ$, $λ = -1$, hence $λ ∈ ℤ$ and $λ ∈ ℚ$
by arithmetic. Then by continuity and the fact that ℚ is dense in ℝ, the same is true for ℝ.
The case of ℂ then follows by applying the result for ℝ and more arithmetic.
## TODO
Move upstream to `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic`.
## References
- [Jordan, P. and von Neumann, J., *On inner products in linear, metric spaces*][Jordan1935]
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21792/norms-induced-by-inner-products-and-the-parallelogram-law
- https://math.dartmouth.edu/archive/m113w10/public_html/jordan-vneumann-thm.pdf
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- Predicate for the parallelogram identity to hold in a normed group. This is a scalar-less
version of `InnerProductSpace`. If you have an `InnerProductSpaceable` assumption, you can
locally upgrade that to `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` using `casesI nonempty_innerProductSpace 𝕜 E`.
-/
class InnerProductSpaceable : Prop where
parallelogram_identity :
∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖)
variable (𝕜) {E}
theorem InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable_ofReal
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] : InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ⟩
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ 𝕜
/-- Auxiliary definition of the inner product derived from the norm. -/
private noncomputable def inner_ (x y : E) : 𝕜 :=
4⁻¹ * (𝓚 ‖x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x + y‖ - 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ +
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ -
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖)
namespace InnerProductSpaceable
variable {𝕜} (E)
-- This has a prime added to avoid clashing with public `innerProp`
/-- Auxiliary definition for the `add_left` property. -/
private def innerProp' (r : 𝕜) : Prop :=
∀ x y : E, inner_ 𝕜 (r • x) y = conj r * inner_ 𝕜 x y
variable {E}
theorem _root_.Continuous.inner_ {f g : ℝ → E} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => inner_ 𝕜 (f x) (g x) := by
unfold _root_.inner_
fun_prop
theorem inner_.norm_sq (x : E) : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner_ 𝕜 x x) := by
simp only [inner_, normSq_apply, ofNat_re, ofNat_im, map_sub, map_add, map_zero, map_mul,
ofReal_re, ofReal_im, mul_re, inv_re, mul_im, I_re, inv_im]
have h₁ : ‖x - x‖ = 0 := by simp
have h₂ : ‖x + x‖ = 2 • ‖x‖ := by convert norm_nsmul 𝕜 2 x using 2; module
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
theorem inner_.conj_symm (x y : E) : conj (inner_ 𝕜 y x) = inner_ 𝕜 x y := by
simp only [inner_, map_sub, map_add, map_mul, map_inv₀, map_ofNat, conj_ofReal, conj_I]
rw [add_comm y x, norm_sub_rev]
by_cases hI : (I : 𝕜) = 0
· simp only [hI, neg_zero, zero_mul]
have hI' := I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI
have I_smul (v : E) : ‖(I : 𝕜) • v‖ = ‖v‖ := by rw [norm_smul, norm_I_of_ne_zero hI, one_mul]
have h₁ : ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - x‖ = ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ := by
convert I_smul ((I : 𝕜) • x + y) using 2
linear_combination (norm := module) -hI' • x
have h₂ : ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + x‖ = ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ := by
| convert (I_smul ((I : 𝕜) • y + x)).symm using 2
linear_combination (norm := module) -hI' • y
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
variable [InnerProductSpaceable E]
private theorem add_left_aux1 (x y z : E) :
‖2 • x + y‖ * ‖2 • x + y‖ + ‖2 • z + y‖ * ‖2 • z + y‖
= 2 * (‖x + y + z‖ * ‖x + y + z‖ + ‖x - z‖ * ‖x - z‖) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/OfNorm.lean | 126 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.InvariantForm
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Semisimple.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.TraceForm
/-!
# Lie algebras with non-degenerate Killing forms.
In characteristic zero, the following three conditions are equivalent:
1. The solvable radical of a Lie algebra is trivial
2. A Lie algebra is a direct sum of its simple ideals
3. A Lie algebra has non-degenerate Killing form
In positive characteristic, it is still true that 3 implies 2, and that 2 implies 1, but there are
counterexamples to the remaining implications. Thus condition 3 is the strongest assumption.
Furthermore, much of the Cartan-Killing classification of semisimple Lie algebras in characteristic
zero, continues to hold in positive characteristic (over a perfect field) if the Lie algebra has a
non-degenerate Killing form.
This file contains basic definitions and results for such Lie algebras.
## Main declarations
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling`: a typeclass encoding the fact that a Lie algebra has a non-singular
Killing form.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.instSemisimple`: if a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field
has non-singular Killing form then it is semisimple.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.instHasTrivialRadical`: if a Lie algebra over a PID
has non-singular Killing form then it has trivial radical.
## TODO
* Prove that in characteristic zero, a semisimple Lie algebra has non-singular Killing form.
-/
variable (R K L : Type*) [CommRing R] [Field K] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [LieAlgebra K L]
namespace LieAlgebra
/-- We say a Lie algebra is Killing if its Killing form is non-singular.
NB: This is not standard terminology (the literature does not seem to name Lie algebras with this
property). -/
class IsKilling : Prop where
/-- We say a Lie algebra is Killing if its Killing form is non-singular. -/
killingCompl_top_eq_bot : LieIdeal.killingCompl R L ⊤ = ⊥
attribute [simp] IsKilling.killingCompl_top_eq_bot
namespace IsKilling
variable [IsKilling R L]
@[simp] lemma ker_killingForm_eq_bot :
LinearMap.ker (killingForm R L) = ⊥ := by
simp [← LieIdeal.coe_killingCompl_top, killingCompl_top_eq_bot]
lemma killingForm_nondegenerate :
(killingForm R L).Nondegenerate := by
simp [LinearMap.BilinForm.nondegenerate_iff_ker_eq_bot]
variable {R L} in
lemma ideal_eq_bot_of_isLieAbelian
[Module.Free R L] [Module.Finite R L] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
(I : LieIdeal R L) [IsLieAbelian I] : I = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← killingCompl_top_eq_bot]
exact I.le_killingCompl_top_of_isLieAbelian
instance instSemisimple [IsKilling K L] [Module.Finite K L] : IsSemisimple K L := by
apply InvariantForm.isSemisimple_of_nondegenerate (Φ := killingForm K L)
· exact IsKilling.killingForm_nondegenerate _ _
· exact LieModule.traceForm_lieInvariant _ _ _
· exact (LieModule.traceForm_isSymm K L L).isRefl
· intro I h₁ h₂
exact h₁.1 <| IsKilling.ideal_eq_bot_of_isLieAbelian I
/-- The converse of this is true over a field of characteristic zero. There are counterexamples
over fields with positive characteristic.
Note that when the coefficients are a field this instance is redundant since we have
`LieAlgebra.IsKilling.instSemisimple` and `LieAlgebra.IsSemisimple.instHasTrivialRadical`. -/
instance instHasTrivialRadical
[Module.Free R L] [Module.Finite R L] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] :
HasTrivialRadical R L :=
(hasTrivialRadical_iff_no_abelian_ideals R L).mpr IsKilling.ideal_eq_bot_of_isLieAbelian
end IsKilling
section LieEquiv
variable {R L}
variable {L' : Type*} [LieRing L'] [LieAlgebra R L']
/-- Given an equivalence `e` of Lie algebras from `L` to `L'`, and elements `x y : L`, the
respective Killing forms of `L` and `L'` satisfy `κ'(e x, e y) = κ(x, y)`. -/
@[simp] lemma killingForm_of_equiv_apply (e : L ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L') (x y : L) :
killingForm R L' (e x) (e y) = killingForm R L x y := by
| simp_rw [killingForm_apply_apply, ← LieAlgebra.conj_ad_apply, ← LinearEquiv.conj_comp,
LinearMap.trace_conj']
/-- Given a Killing Lie algebra `L`, if `L'` is isomorphic to `L`, then `L'` is Killing too. -/
lemma isKilling_of_equiv [IsKilling R L] (e : L ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L') : IsKilling R L' := by
constructor
ext x'
simp_rw [LieIdeal.mem_killingCompl, LieModule.traceForm_comm]
refine ⟨fun hx' ↦ ?_, fun hx y _ ↦ hx ▸ LinearMap.map_zero₂ (killingForm R L') y⟩
suffices e.symm x' ∈ LinearMap.ker (killingForm R L) by
rw [IsKilling.ker_killingForm_eq_bot] at this
simpa [map_zero] using (e : L ≃ₗ[R] L').congr_arg this
ext y
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Killing.lean | 103 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# The complex numbers
The complex numbers are modelled as ℝ^2 in the obvious way and it is shown that they form a field
of characteristic zero. The result that the complex numbers are algebraically closed, see
`FieldTheory.AlgebraicClosure`.
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset Algebra
open Set Function
/-! ### Definition and basic arithmetic -/
/-- Complex numbers consist of two `Real`s: a real part `re` and an imaginary part `im`. -/
structure Complex : Type where
/-- The real part of a complex number. -/
re : ℝ
/-- The imaginary part of a complex number. -/
im : ℝ
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℂ" => Complex
namespace Complex
open ComplexConjugate
noncomputable instance : DecidableEq ℂ :=
Classical.decEq _
/-- The equivalence between the complex numbers and `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivRealProd : ℂ ≃ ℝ × ℝ where
toFun z := ⟨z.re, z.im⟩
invFun p := ⟨p.1, p.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ z : ℂ, Complex.mk z.re z.im = z
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
-- We only mark this lemma with `ext` *locally* to avoid it applying whenever terms of `ℂ` appear.
theorem ext : ∀ {z w : ℂ}, z.re = w.re → z.im = w.im → z = w
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
attribute [local ext] Complex.ext
lemma «forall» {p : ℂ → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ∀ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ := by aesop
lemma «exists» {p : ℂ → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ∃ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ := by aesop
theorem re_surjective : Surjective re := fun x => ⟨⟨x, 0⟩, rfl⟩
theorem im_surjective : Surjective im := fun y => ⟨⟨0, y⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_re : range re = univ :=
re_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_im : range im = univ :=
im_surjective.range_eq
/-- The natural inclusion of the real numbers into the complex numbers. -/
@[coe]
def ofReal (r : ℝ) : ℂ :=
⟨r, 0⟩
instance : Coe ℝ ℂ :=
⟨ofReal⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_re (r : ℝ) : Complex.re (r : ℂ) = r :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_im (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem ofReal_def (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ) = ⟨r, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = w ↔ z = w :=
⟨congrArg re, by apply congrArg⟩
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) := fun _ _ => congrArg re
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℝ (↑) fun z => z.im = 0 where
prf z hz := ⟨z.re, ext rfl hz.symm⟩
/-- The product of a set on the real axis and a set on the imaginary axis of the complex plane,
denoted by `s ×ℂ t`. -/
def reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : Set ℂ :=
re ⁻¹' s ∩ im ⁻¹' t
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-03")] protected alias Set.reProdIm := reProdIm
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:72 " ×ℂ " => reProdIm
theorem mem_reProdIm {z : ℂ} {s t : Set ℝ} : z ∈ s ×ℂ t ↔ z.re ∈ s ∧ z.im ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
instance : Zero ℂ :=
⟨(0 : ℝ)⟩
instance : Inhabited ℂ :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℂ).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
ofReal_inj
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_zero
instance : One ℂ :=
⟨(1 : ℝ)⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℂ).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 1 ↔ z = 1 :=
ofReal_inj
theorem ofReal_ne_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 1 ↔ z ≠ 1 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_one
instance : Add ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re + w.re, z.im + w.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
-- replaced by `re_ofNat`
-- replaced by `im_ofNat`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r + s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
-- replaced by `Complex.ofReal_ofNat`
instance : Neg ℂ :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.re, -z.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℂ) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℂ) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : ℂ) = -r :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
instance : Sub ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re - w.re, z.im - w.im⟩⟩
instance : Mul ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im, z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r * s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).re = r * z.re := by simp [ofReal]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).im = r * z.im := by simp [ofReal]
lemma re_mul_ofReal (z : ℂ) (r : ℝ) : (z * r).re = z.re * r := by simp [ofReal]
lemma im_mul_ofReal (z : ℂ) (r : ℝ) : (z * r).im = z.im * r := by simp [ofReal]
theorem ofReal_mul' (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : ↑r * z = ⟨r * z.re, r * z.im⟩ :=
ext (re_ofReal_mul _ _) (im_ofReal_mul _ _)
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
def I : ℂ :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem I_re : I.re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem I_im : I.im = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem I_mul_I : I * I = -1 :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
theorem I_mul (z : ℂ) : I * z = ⟨-z.im, z.re⟩ :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
@[simp] lemma I_ne_zero : (I : ℂ) ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) zero_ne_one.symm
theorem mk_eq_add_mul_I (a b : ℝ) : Complex.mk a b = a + b * I :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem re_add_im (z : ℂ) : (z.re : ℂ) + z.im * I = z :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
theorem mul_I_re (z : ℂ) : (z * I).re = -z.im := by simp
theorem mul_I_im (z : ℂ) : (z * I).im = z.re := by simp
theorem I_mul_re (z : ℂ) : (I * z).re = -z.im := by simp
theorem I_mul_im (z : ℂ) : (I * z).im = z.re := by simp
@[simp]
theorem equivRealProd_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) : equivRealProd.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * I := by
ext <;> simp [Complex.equivRealProd, ofReal]
/-- The natural `AddEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs apply symm_apply_re symm_apply_im]
def equivRealProdAddHom : ℂ ≃+ ℝ × ℝ :=
{ equivRealProd with map_add' := by simp }
theorem equivRealProdAddHom_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) :
equivRealProdAddHom.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * I := equivRealProd_symm_apply p
/-! ### Commutative ring instance and lemmas -/
/- We use a nonstandard formula for the `ℕ` and `ℤ` actions to make sure there is no
diamond from the other actions they inherit through the `ℝ`-action on `ℂ` and action transitivity
defined in `Data.Complex.Module`. -/
instance : Nontrivial ℂ :=
domain_nontrivial re rfl rfl
namespace SMul
-- The useless `0` multiplication in `smul` is to make sure that
-- `RestrictScalars.module ℝ ℂ ℂ = Complex.module` definitionally.
-- instance made scoped to avoid situations like instance synthesis
-- of `SMul ℂ ℂ` trying to proceed via `SMul ℂ ℝ`.
/-- Scalar multiplication by `R` on `ℝ` extends to `ℂ`. This is used here and in
`Matlib.Data.Complex.Module` to transfer instances from `ℝ` to `ℂ`, but is not
needed outside, so we make it scoped. -/
scoped instance instSMulRealComplex {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ] : SMul R ℂ where
smul r x := ⟨r • x.re - 0 * x.im, r • x.im + 0 * x.re⟩
end SMul
open scoped SMul
section SMul
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ]
theorem smul_re (r : R) (z : ℂ) : (r • z).re = r • z.re := by simp [(· • ·), SMul.smul]
theorem smul_im (r : R) (z : ℂ) : (r • z).im = r • z.im := by simp [(· • ·), SMul.smul]
@[simp]
theorem real_smul {x : ℝ} {z : ℂ} : x • z = x * z :=
rfl
end SMul
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup ℂ :=
{ zero := (0 : ℂ)
add := (· + ·)
neg := Neg.neg
sub := Sub.sub
nsmul := fun n z => n • z
zsmul := fun n z => n • z
zsmul_zero' := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im]
nsmul_zero := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im]
nsmul_succ := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im] <;> ring
zsmul_succ' := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im] <;> ring
zsmul_neg' := by intros; ext <;> simp [smul_re, smul_im] <;> ring
add_assoc := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
zero_add := by intros; ext <;> simp
add_zero := by intros; ext <;> simp
add_comm := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
neg_add_cancel := by intros; ext <;> simp }
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne ℂ :=
{ Complex.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
natCast_zero := by
ext <;> simp [Nat.cast, AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero]
natCast_succ := fun _ => by ext <;> simp [Nat.cast, AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ]
intCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun _ => by ext <;> rfl
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by
ext
· simp [AddGroupWithOne.intCast_negSucc]
show -(1 : ℝ) + (-n) = -(↑(n + 1))
simp [Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
· simp [AddGroupWithOne.intCast_negSucc]
show im ⟨n, 0⟩ = 0
rfl
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing ℂ :=
{ addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec _ ⟨(1 : ℂ)⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
add_comm := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
left_distrib := by intros; ext <;> simp [mul_re, mul_im] <;> ring
right_distrib := by intros; ext <;> simp [mul_re, mul_im] <;> ring
zero_mul := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_zero := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_assoc := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring
one_mul := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_one := by intros; ext <;> simp
mul_comm := by intros; ext <;> simp <;> ring }
/-- This shortcut instance ensures we do not find `Ring` via the noncomputable `Complex.field`
instance. -/
instance : Ring ℂ := by infer_instance
/-- This shortcut instance ensures we do not find `CommSemiring` via the noncomputable
`Complex.field` instance. -/
instance : CommSemiring ℂ :=
inferInstance
/-- This shortcut instance ensures we do not find `Semiring` via the noncomputable
`Complex.field` instance. -/
instance : Semiring ℂ :=
inferInstance
/-- The "real part" map, considered as an additive group homomorphism. -/
def reAddGroupHom : ℂ →+ ℝ where
toFun := re
map_zero' := zero_re
map_add' := add_re
@[simp]
theorem coe_reAddGroupHom : (reAddGroupHom : ℂ → ℝ) = re :=
rfl
/-- The "imaginary part" map, considered as an additive group homomorphism. -/
def imAddGroupHom : ℂ →+ ℝ where
toFun := im
map_zero' := zero_im
map_add' := add_im
@[simp]
theorem coe_imAddGroupHom : (imAddGroupHom : ℂ → ℝ) = im :=
rfl
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℂ where nnratCast q := ofReal q
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℂ where ratCast q := ofReal q
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofReal ofNat(n) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ofReal n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ofReal n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ofReal q = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofReal_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ofReal q = q := rfl
@[simp]
lemma re_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℂ).re = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp] lemma im_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℂ).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℂ).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma re_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℂ).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma im_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : (q : ℂ).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : (q : ℂ).im = 0 := rfl
lemma re_nsmul (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).re = n • z.re := smul_re ..
lemma im_nsmul (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).im = n • z.im := smul_im ..
lemma re_zsmul (n : ℤ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).re = n • z.re := smul_re ..
lemma im_zsmul (n : ℤ) (z : ℂ) : (n • z).im = n • z.im := smul_im ..
@[simp] lemma re_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).re = q • z.re := smul_re ..
@[simp] lemma im_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).im = q • z.im := smul_im ..
@[simp] lemma re_qsmul (q : ℚ) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).re = q • z.re := smul_re ..
@[simp] lemma im_qsmul (q : ℚ) (z : ℂ) : (q • z).im = q • z.im := smul_im ..
@[norm_cast] lemma ofReal_nsmul (n : ℕ) (r : ℝ) : ↑(n • r) = n • (r : ℂ) := by simp
@[norm_cast] lemma ofReal_zsmul (n : ℤ) (r : ℝ) : ↑(n • r) = n • (r : ℂ) := by simp
/-! ### Complex conjugation -/
/-- This defines the complex conjugate as the `star` operation of the `StarRing ℂ`. It
is recommended to use the ring endomorphism version `starRingEnd`, available under the
notation `conj` in the locale `ComplexConjugate`. -/
instance : StarRing ℂ where
star z := ⟨z.re, -z.im⟩
star_involutive x := by simp only [eta, neg_neg]
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm] <;> ring
star_add a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem conj_re (z : ℂ) : (conj z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conj_im (z : ℂ) : (conj z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : ℂ) = r :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [star]
@[simp]
theorem conj_I : conj I = -I :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
theorem conj_natCast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : ℂ) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : ℂ) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = I := by simp
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : ℂ} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = r :=
⟨fun h => ⟨z.re, ext rfl <| eq_zero_of_neg_eq (congr_arg im h)⟩, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => by
rw [e, conj_ofReal]⟩
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : ℂ} : conj z = z ↔ (z.re : ℂ) = z :=
conj_eq_iff_real.trans ⟨by rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩; simp [ofReal], fun h => ⟨_, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : ℂ} : conj z = z ↔ z.im = 0 :=
⟨fun h => add_self_eq_zero.mp (neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg im h)), fun h =>
ext rfl (neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero.mpr (add_self_eq_zero.mpr h))⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : ℂ → ℂ) = conj :=
rfl
/-! ### Norm squared -/
/-- The norm squared function. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def normSq : ℂ →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := z.re * z.re + z.im * z.im
map_zero' := by simp
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' z w := by
dsimp
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : ℂ) : normSq z = z.re * z.re + z.im * z.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem normSq_ofReal (r : ℝ) : normSq r = r * r := by
simp [normSq, ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_natCast (n : ℕ) : normSq n = n * n := normSq_ofReal _
@[simp]
theorem normSq_intCast (z : ℤ) : normSq z = z * z := normSq_ofReal _
@[simp]
theorem normSq_ratCast (q : ℚ) : normSq q = q * q := normSq_ofReal _
@[simp]
theorem normSq_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
normSq (ofNat(n) : ℂ) = ofNat(n) * ofNat(n) :=
normSq_natCast _
@[simp]
theorem normSq_mk (x y : ℝ) : normSq ⟨x, y⟩ = x * x + y * y :=
rfl
theorem normSq_add_mul_I (x y : ℝ) : normSq (x + y * I) = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 := by
rw [← mk_eq_add_mul_I, normSq_mk, sq, sq]
theorem normSq_eq_conj_mul_self {z : ℂ} : (normSq z : ℂ) = conj z * z := by
ext <;> simp [normSq, mul_comm, ofReal]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem normSq_one : normSq 1 = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem normSq_I : normSq I = 1 := by simp [normSq]
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : ℂ) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : ℂ} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
ext (eq_zero_of_mul_self_add_mul_self_eq_zero h)
(eq_zero_of_mul_self_add_mul_self_eq_zero <| (add_comm _ _).trans h),
fun h => h.symm ▸ normSq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem normSq_pos {z : ℂ} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 :=
(normSq_nonneg z).lt_iff_ne.trans <| not_congr (eq_comm.trans normSq_eq_zero)
@[simp]
theorem normSq_neg (z : ℂ) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp [normSq]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_conj (z : ℂ) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by simp [normSq]
theorem normSq_mul (z w : ℂ) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
normSq.map_mul z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : ℂ) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * (z * conj w).re := by
dsimp [normSq]; ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : ℂ) : z.re * z.re ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : ℂ) : z.im * z.im ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : ℂ) : z * conj z = normSq z :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [normSq, mul_comm, sub_eq_neg_add, add_comm, ofReal]
theorem add_conj (z : ℂ) : z + conj z = (2 * z.re : ℝ) :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [two_mul, ofReal]
/-- The coercion `ℝ → ℂ` as a `RingHom`. -/
def ofRealHom : ℝ →+* ℂ where
toFun x := (x : ℂ)
map_one' := ofReal_one
map_zero' := ofReal_zero
map_mul' := ofReal_mul
map_add' := ofReal_add
@[simp] lemma ofRealHom_eq_coe (r : ℝ) : ofRealHom r = r := rfl
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_add (f g : α → ℝ) : ofReal ∘ (f + g) = ofReal ∘ f + ofReal ∘ g :=
map_comp_add ofRealHom ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_sub (f g : α → ℝ) : ofReal ∘ (f - g) = ofReal ∘ f - ofReal ∘ g :=
map_comp_sub ofRealHom ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_neg (f : α → ℝ) : ofReal ∘ (-f) = -(ofReal ∘ f) :=
map_comp_neg ofRealHom _
lemma ofReal_comp_nsmul (n : ℕ) (f : α → ℝ) : ofReal ∘ (n • f) = n • (ofReal ∘ f) :=
map_comp_nsmul ofRealHom ..
lemma ofReal_comp_zsmul (n : ℤ) (f : α → ℝ) : ofReal ∘ (n • f) = n • (ofReal ∘ f) :=
map_comp_zsmul ofRealHom ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_mul (f g : α → ℝ) : ofReal ∘ (f * g) = ofReal ∘ f * ofReal ∘ g :=
map_comp_mul ofRealHom ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_pow (f : α → ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ofReal ∘ (f ^ n) = (ofReal ∘ f) ^ n :=
map_comp_pow ofRealHom ..
@[simp]
theorem I_sq : I ^ 2 = -1 := by rw [sq, I_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma I_pow_three : I ^ 3 = -I := by rw [pow_succ, I_sq, neg_one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem I_pow_four : I ^ 4 = 1 := by rw [(by norm_num : 4 = 2 * 2), pow_mul, I_sq, neg_one_sq]
lemma I_pow_eq_pow_mod (n : ℕ) : I ^ n = I ^ (n % 4) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.div_add_mod n 4]
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, I_pow_four]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℂ) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℂ) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r - s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : ℂ) = (r : ℂ) ^ n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, ofReal_mul, pow_succ]
theorem sub_conj (z : ℂ) : z - conj z = (2 * z.im : ℝ) * I :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, ofReal]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : ℂ) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * (z * conj w).re := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, normSq_add]
simp only [RingHom.map_neg, mul_neg, neg_re, normSq_neg]
ring
/-! ### Inversion -/
noncomputable instance : Inv ℂ :=
⟨fun z => conj z * ((normSq z)⁻¹ : ℝ)⟩
theorem inv_def (z : ℂ) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((normSq z)⁻¹ : ℝ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inv_re (z : ℂ) : z⁻¹.re = z.re / normSq z := by simp [inv_def, division_def, ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem inv_im (z : ℂ) : z⁻¹.im = -z.im / normSq z := by simp [inv_def, division_def, ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : ℂ) = (r : ℂ)⁻¹ :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
protected theorem inv_zero : (0⁻¹ : ℂ) = 0 := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ← ofReal_inv, inv_zero]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel {z : ℂ} (h : z ≠ 0) : z * z⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [inv_def, ← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ← ofReal_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ (mt normSq_eq_zero.1 h),
ofReal_one]
noncomputable instance instDivInvMonoid : DivInvMonoid ℂ where
lemma div_re (z w : ℂ) : (z / w).re = z.re * w.re / normSq w + z.im * w.im / normSq w := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma div_im (z w : ℂ) : (z / w).im = z.im * w.re / normSq w - z.re * w.im / normSq w := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
/-! ### Field instance and lemmas -/
noncomputable instance instField : Field ℂ where
mul_inv_cancel := @Complex.mul_inv_cancel
inv_zero := Complex.inv_zero
nnqsmul := (· • ·)
qsmul := (· • ·)
nnratCast_def q := by ext <;> simp [NNRat.cast_def, div_re, div_im, mul_div_mul_comm]
ratCast_def q := by ext <;> simp [Rat.cast_def, div_re, div_im, mul_div_mul_comm]
nnqsmul_def n z := Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [NNRat.smul_def, smul_re, smul_im]
qsmul_def n z := Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [Rat.smul_def, smul_re, smul_im]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (r : ℝ) : ofReal (q • r) = q • r := by simp [NNRat.smul_def]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_qsmul (q : ℚ) (r : ℝ) : ofReal (q • r) = q • r := by simp [Rat.smul_def]
theorem conj_inv (x : ℂ) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r / s := map_div₀ ofRealHom r s
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : ℂ) = (r : ℂ) ^ n := map_zpow₀ ofRealHom r n
@[simp]
theorem div_I (z : ℂ) : z / I = -(z * I) :=
(div_eq_iff_mul_eq I_ne_zero).2 <| by simp [mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem inv_I : I⁻¹ = -I := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_I, one_mul]
theorem normSq_inv (z : ℂ) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ := by simp
theorem normSq_div (z w : ℂ) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w := by simp
lemma div_ofReal (z : ℂ) (x : ℝ) : z / x = ⟨z.re / x, z.im / x⟩ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, ofReal_mul']
lemma div_natCast (z : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : z / n = ⟨z.re / n, z.im / n⟩ :=
mod_cast div_ofReal z n
lemma div_intCast (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : z / n = ⟨z.re / n, z.im / n⟩ :=
mod_cast div_ofReal z n
lemma div_ratCast (z : ℂ) (x : ℚ) : z / x = ⟨z.re / x, z.im / x⟩ :=
mod_cast div_ofReal z x
lemma div_ofNat (z : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
z / ofNat(n) = ⟨z.re / ofNat(n), z.im / ofNat(n)⟩ :=
div_natCast z n
@[simp] lemma div_ofReal_re (z : ℂ) (x : ℝ) : (z / x).re = z.re / x := by rw [div_ofReal]
@[simp] lemma div_ofReal_im (z : ℂ) (x : ℝ) : (z / x).im = z.im / x := by rw [div_ofReal]
@[simp] lemma div_natCast_re (z : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : (z / n).re = z.re / n := by rw [div_natCast]
@[simp] lemma div_natCast_im (z : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : (z / n).im = z.im / n := by rw [div_natCast]
@[simp] lemma div_intCast_re (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : (z / n).re = z.re / n := by rw [div_intCast]
@[simp] lemma div_intCast_im (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : (z / n).im = z.im / n := by rw [div_intCast]
@[simp] lemma div_ratCast_re (z : ℂ) (x : ℚ) : (z / x).re = z.re / x := by rw [div_ratCast]
@[simp] lemma div_ratCast_im (z : ℂ) (x : ℚ) : (z / x).im = z.im / x := by rw [div_ratCast]
@[simp]
lemma div_ofNat_re (z : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(z / ofNat(n)).re = z.re / ofNat(n) := div_natCast_re z n
@[simp]
lemma div_ofNat_im (z : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(z / ofNat(n)).im = z.im / ofNat(n) := div_natCast_im z n
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℂ :=
charZero_of_inj_zero fun n h => by rwa [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_eq_zero, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at h
/-- A complex number `z` plus its conjugate `conj z` is `2` times its real part. -/
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : ℂ) : (z.re : ℂ) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
simp only [add_conj, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (z.re : ℂ) two_ne_zero]
/-- A complex number `z` minus its conjugate `conj z` is `2i` times its imaginary part. -/
theorem im_eq_sub_conj (z : ℂ) : (z.im : ℂ) = (z - conj z) / (2 * I) := by
simp only [sub_conj, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, mul_right_comm,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero I_ne_zero : 2 * I ≠ 0)]
/-- Show the imaginary number ⟨x, y⟩ as an "x + y*I" string
Note that the Real numbers used for x and y will show as cauchy sequences due to the way Real
numbers are represented.
-/
unsafe instance instRepr : Repr ℂ where
reprPrec f p :=
(if p > 65 then (Std.Format.bracket "(" · ")") else (·)) <|
reprPrec f.re 65 ++ " + " ++ reprPrec f.im 70 ++ "*I"
section reProdIm
/-- The preimage under `equivRealProd` of `s ×ˢ t` is `s ×ℂ t`. -/
lemma preimage_equivRealProd_prod (s t : Set ℝ) : equivRealProd ⁻¹' (s ×ˢ t) = s ×ℂ t := rfl
/-- The inequality `s × t ⊆ s₁ × t₁` holds in `ℂ` iff it holds in `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
lemma reProdIm_subset_iff {s s₁ t t₁ : Set ℝ} : s ×ℂ t ⊆ s₁ ×ℂ t₁ ↔ s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ := by
rw [← @preimage_equivRealProd_prod s t, ← @preimage_equivRealProd_prod s₁ t₁]
exact Equiv.preimage_subset equivRealProd _ _
/-- If `s ⊆ s₁ ⊆ ℝ` and `t ⊆ t₁ ⊆ ℝ`, then `s × t ⊆ s₁ × t₁` in `ℂ`. -/
lemma reProdIm_subset_iff' {s s₁ t t₁ : Set ℝ} :
s ×ℂ t ⊆ s₁ ×ℂ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
convert prod_subset_prod_iff
exact reProdIm_subset_iff
variable {s t : Set ℝ}
@[simp] lemma reProdIm_nonempty : (s ×ℂ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
simp [Set.Nonempty, reProdIm, Complex.exists]
@[simp] lemma reProdIm_eq_empty : s ×ℂ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, reProdIm_nonempty, -not_and, not_and_or]
end reProdIm
open scoped Interval
section Rectangle
/-- A `Rectangle` is an axis-parallel rectangle with corners `z` and `w`. -/
def Rectangle (z w : ℂ) : Set ℂ := [[z.re, w.re]] ×ℂ [[z.im, w.im]]
end Rectangle
section Segments
/-- A real segment `[a₁, a₂]` translated by `b * I` is the complex line segment. -/
lemma horizontalSegment_eq (a₁ a₂ b : ℝ) :
(fun (x : ℝ) ↦ x + b * I) '' [[a₁, a₂]] = [[a₁, a₂]] ×ℂ {b} := by
rw [← preimage_equivRealProd_prod]
ext x
constructor
· intro hx
obtain ⟨x₁, hx₁, hx₁'⟩ := hx
simp [← hx₁', mem_preimage, mem_prod, hx₁]
· intro hx
obtain ⟨x₁, hx₁, hx₁', hx₁''⟩ := hx
refine ⟨x.re, x₁, by simp⟩
/-- A vertical segment `[b₁, b₂]` translated by `a` is the complex line segment. -/
lemma verticalSegment_eq (a b₁ b₂ : ℝ) :
(fun (y : ℝ) ↦ a + y * I) '' [[b₁, b₂]] = {a} ×ℂ [[b₁, b₂]] := by
rw [← preimage_equivRealProd_prod]
ext x
constructor
· intro hx
obtain ⟨x₁, hx₁, hx₁'⟩ := hx
simp [← hx₁', mem_preimage, mem_prod, hx₁]
· intro hx
simp only [equivRealProd_apply, singleton_prod, mem_image, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right_right, mem_preimage] at hx
obtain ⟨x₁, hx₁, hx₁', hx₁''⟩ := hx
refine ⟨x.im, x₁, by simp⟩
end Segments
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Basic.lean | 936 | 936 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
lemma disjoint_edgeFinset : Disjoint G₁.edgeFinset G₂.edgeFinset ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.disjoint_coe, coe_edgeFinset, disjoint_edgeSet]
lemma edgeFinset_eq_empty : G.edgeFinset = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by
rw [← edgeFinset_bot, edgeFinset_inj]
lemma edgeFinset_nonempty : G.edgeFinset.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeFinset_eq_empty.ne]
theorem edgeFinset_card : #G.edgeFinset = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : #(univ : Finset G.edgeSet) = #G.edgeFinset :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ({e | ¬e.IsDiag} : Finset _) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
#(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : #G.edgeFinset ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ := #(G.neighborFinset v)
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : #(G.neighborFinset v) = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
theorem degree_pos_iff_mem_support : 0 < G.degree v ↔ v ∈ G.support := by
rw [G.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj v, mem_support]
theorem degree_eq_zero_iff_not_mem_support : G.degree v = 0 ↔ v ∉ G.support := by
rw [← G.degree_pos_iff_mem_support v, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, not_ne_iff]
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] : #(G.incidenceFinset v) = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = {e ∈ G.edgeFinset | v ∈ e} := by
ext e
induction e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
variable {G v}
/-- If `G ≤ H` then `G.degree v ≤ H.degree v` for any vertex `v`. -/
lemma degree_le_of_le {H : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype (H.neighborSet v)] (hle : G ≤ H) :
G.degree v ≤ H.degree v := by
simp_rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card fun v hv => hle hv
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
variable {G}
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
intro v
rw [degree_compl, h v]
end LocallyFinite
section Finite
variable [Fintype V]
instance neighborSetFintype [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : Fintype (G.neighborSet v) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ (· ∈ G.neighborSet v)
(by
simp_rw [mem_neighborSet]
infer_instance)
_
theorem neighborFinset_eq_filter {v : V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
G.neighborFinset v = ({w | G.Adj v w} : Finset _) := by ext; simp
theorem neighborFinset_compl [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
simp only [neighborFinset, neighborSet_compl, Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_compl,
Set.toFinset_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem complete_graph_degree [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 := by
simp_rw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, top_adj, filter_ne]
rw [card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ v), card_univ]
theorem bot_degree (v : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = 0 := by
simp_rw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, bot_adj, filter_False]
exact Finset.card_empty
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1) := by
intro v
simp
/-- The minimum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_minimal_degree_vertex`, `minDegree_le_degree`
and `le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree`. -/
def minDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
WithTop.untopD 0 (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).min
/-- There exists a vertex of minimal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_minimal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.minDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := min_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
obtain ⟨v, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp (mem_of_min ht)
exact ⟨v, by simp [minDegree, ht]⟩
/-- The minimum degree in the graph is at most the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem minDegree_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.minDegree ≤ G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Finset.min_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.min_le_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [minDegree, ht]
/-- In a nonempty graph, if `k` is at most the degree of every vertex, it is at most the minimum
degree. Note the assumption that the graph is nonempty is necessary as long as `G.minDegree` is
defined to be a natural. -/
theorem le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] (k : ℕ)
(h : ∀ v, k ≤ G.degree v) : k ≤ G.minDegree := by
rcases G.exists_minimal_degree_vertex with ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [hv]
apply h
/-- If there are no vertices then the `minDegree` is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma minDegree_of_isEmpty [DecidableRel G.Adj] [IsEmpty V] : G.minDegree = 0 := by
rw [minDegree, WithTop.untopD_eq_self_iff]
simp
variable {G} in
/-- If `G` is a subgraph of `H` then `G.minDegree ≤ H.minDegree`. -/
lemma minDegree_le_minDegree {H : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
(hle : G ≤ H) : G.minDegree ≤ H.minDegree := by
by_cases hne : Nonempty V
· apply le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree
exact fun v ↦ (G.minDegree_le_degree v).trans (G.degree_le_of_le hle)
· rw [not_nonempty_iff] at hne
simp
/-- The maximum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_maximal_degree_vertex`, `degree_le_maxDegree`
and `maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le`. -/
def maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
Option.getD (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).max 0
/-- There exists a vertex of maximal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_maximal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.maxDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := max_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
have ht₂ := mem_of_max ht
simp only [mem_image, mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true] at ht₂
rcases ht₂ with ⟨v, _, rfl⟩
refine ⟨v, ?_⟩
rw [maxDegree, ht]
rfl
/-- The maximum degree in the graph is at least the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem degree_le_maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.degree v ≤ G.maxDegree := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := Finset.max_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.le_max_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [maxDegree, ht]
/-- In a graph, if `k` is at least the degree of every vertex, then it is at least the maximum
degree. -/
theorem maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le [DecidableRel G.Adj] (k : ℕ) (h : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ k) :
G.maxDegree ≤ k := by
by_cases hV : (univ : Finset V).Nonempty
· haveI : Nonempty V := univ_nonempty_iff.mp hV
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := G.exists_maximal_degree_vertex
rw [hv]
apply h
· rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hV
rw [maxDegree, hV, image_empty]
exact k.zero_le
theorem degree_lt_card_verts [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.degree v < Fintype.card V := by
classical
apply Finset.card_lt_card
rw [Finset.ssubset_iff]
exact ⟨v, by simp, Finset.subset_univ _⟩
/--
The maximum degree of a nonempty graph is less than the number of vertices. Note that the assumption
that `V` is nonempty is necessary, as otherwise this would assert the existence of a
natural number less than zero. -/
theorem maxDegree_lt_card_verts [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
G.maxDegree < Fintype.card V := by
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := G.exists_maximal_degree_vertex
rw [hv]
apply G.degree_lt_card_verts v
theorem card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v w : V) :
Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) ≤ G.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card Set.inter_subset_left
theorem card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_right [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v w : V) :
Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) ≤ G.degree w := by
simp_rw [commonNeighbors_symm _ v w, card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left]
theorem card_commonNeighbors_lt_card_verts [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v w : V) :
Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) < Fintype.card V :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (G.card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left _ _) (G.degree_lt_card_verts v)
/-- If the condition `G.Adj v w` fails, then `card_commonNeighbors_le_degree` is
the best we can do in general. -/
theorem Adj.card_commonNeighbors_lt_degree {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] {v w : V}
(h : G.Adj v w) : Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) < G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← Set.toFinset_card]
apply Finset.card_lt_card
rw [Finset.ssubset_iff]
use w
constructor
· rw [Set.mem_toFinset]
apply not_mem_commonNeighbors_right
· rw [Finset.insert_subset_iff]
constructor
· simpa
· rw [neighborFinset, Set.toFinset_subset_toFinset]
exact G.commonNeighbors_subset_neighborSet_left _ _
theorem card_commonNeighbors_top [DecidableEq V] {v w : V} (h : v ≠ w) :
Fintype.card ((⊤ : SimpleGraph V).commonNeighbors v w) = Fintype.card V - 2 := by
simp only [commonNeighbors_top_eq, ← Set.toFinset_card, Set.toFinset_diff]
rw [Finset.card_sdiff]
· simp [Finset.card_univ, h]
· simp only [Set.toFinset_subset_toFinset, Set.subset_univ]
end Finite
section Support
variable {s : Set V} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [Fintype V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
lemma edgeFinset_subset_sym2_of_support_subset (h : G.support ⊆ s) :
G.edgeFinset ⊆ s.toFinset.sym2 := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, Sym2.forall,
mem_edgeFinset, mem_edgeSet, mk_mem_sym2_iff, Set.mem_toFinset]
intro _ _ hadj
exact ⟨h ⟨_, hadj⟩, h ⟨_, hadj.symm⟩⟩
instance : DecidablePred (· ∈ G.support) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred (· ∈ { v | ∃ w, G.Adj v w })
variable [DecidableEq V]
theorem map_edgeFinset_induce :
| (G.induce s).edgeFinset.map (Embedding.subtype s).sym2Map
= G.edgeFinset ∩ s.toFinset.sym2 := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, Sym2.forall, mem_inter, mk_mem_sym2_iff, mem_map, Sym2.exists,
Set.mem_toFinset, mem_edgeSet, comap_adj, Embedding.sym2Map_apply, Embedding.coe_subtype,
Sym2.map_pair_eq, Sym2.eq_iff]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 442 | 446 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Nonnegative rationals
This file defines the nonnegative rationals as a subtype of `Rat` and provides its basic algebraic
order structure.
Note that `NNRat` is not declared as a `Semifield` here. See `Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat` for that
instance.
We also define an instance `CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0`. This instance can be used by the `lift` tactic to
replace `x : ℚ` and `hx : 0 ≤ x` in the proof context with `x : ℚ≥0` while replacing all occurrences
of `x` with `↑x`. This tactic also works for a function `f : α → ℚ` with a hypothesis
`hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x`.
## Notation
`ℚ≥0` is notation for `NNRat` in locale `NNRat`.
## Huge warning
Whenever you state a lemma about the coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ`, check that Lean inserts `NNRat.cast`, not
`Subtype.val`. Else your lemma will never apply.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice OrderedCommMonoid
library_note "specialised high priority simp lemma" /--
It sometimes happens that a `@[simp]` lemma declared early in the library can be proved by `simp`
using later, more general simp lemmas. In that case, the following reasons might be arguments for
the early lemma to be tagged `@[simp high]` (rather than `@[simp, nolint simpNF]` or
un``@[simp]``ed):
1. There is a significant portion of the library which needs the early lemma to be available via
`simp` and which doesn't have access to the more general lemmas.
2. The more general lemmas have more complicated typeclass assumptions, causing rewrites with them
to be slower.
-/
open Function
instance Rat.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℚ where
zero_le_one := rfl
instance Rat.instPosMulMono : PosMulMono ℚ where
elim := fun r p q h => by
simp only [mul_comm]
simpa [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using Rat.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 h) r.2
deriving instance CommSemiring for NNRat
deriving instance LinearOrder for NNRat
deriving instance Sub for NNRat
deriving instance Inhabited for NNRat
namespace NNRat
variable {p q : ℚ≥0}
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℚ≥0 where exists_pair_ne := ⟨1, 0, by decide⟩
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot ℚ≥0 where
bot := 0
bot_le q := q.2
@[simp] lemma val_eq_cast (q : ℚ≥0) : q.1 = q := rfl
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℚ≥0 where
cast_injective a b hab := by simpa using congr_arg num hab
instance canLift : CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0 (↑) fun q ↦ 0 ≤ q where
prf q hq := ⟨⟨q, hq⟩, rfl⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext : (p : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) → p = q :=
Subtype.ext
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (p : ℚ) = q ↔ p = q :=
Subtype.coe_inj
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℚ≥0} : (x : ℚ) ≠ (y : ℚ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
NNRat.coe_inj.not
-- TODO: We have to write `NNRat.cast` explicitly, else the statement picks up `Subtype.val` instead
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (q : ℚ) (hq) : NNRat.cast ⟨q, hq⟩ = q := rfl
lemma «forall» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∀ q, p q) ↔ ∀ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.forall
lemma «exists» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∃ q, p q) ↔ ∃ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.exists
/-- Reinterpret a rational number `q` as a non-negative rational number. Returns `0` if `q ≤ 0`. -/
def _root_.Rat.toNNRat (q : ℚ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨max q 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
theorem _root_.Rat.coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) : (q.toNNRat : ℚ) = q :=
max_eq_left hq
theorem _root_.Rat.le_coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) : q ≤ q.toNNRat :=
le_max_left _ _
open Rat (toNNRat)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nonneg (q : ℚ≥0) : (0 : ℚ) ≤ q :=
q.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : num 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_zero : den 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_one : num 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_one : den 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p + q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p * q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p * q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (↑(q ^ n) : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma num_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).num = q.num ^ n := by simp [num, Int.natAbs_pow]
@[simp] lemma den_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).den = q.den ^ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (h : q ≤ p) : ((p - q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p - q :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by rwa [sub_zero]
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem coe_eq_zero : (q : ℚ) = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by norm_cast
theorem coe_ne_zero : (q : ℚ) ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 :=
coe_eq_zero.not
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe : (p : ℚ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe : (p : ℚ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos : (0 : ℚ) < q ↔ 0 < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem coe_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
fun _ _ ↦ coe_le_coe.2
theorem toNNRat_mono : Monotone toNNRat :=
fun _ _ h ↦ max_le_max h le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : toNNRat q = q :=
ext <| max_eq_left q.2
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : toNNRat n = n :=
ext <| by simp only [Nat.cast_nonneg', Rat.coe_toNNRat]; rfl
/-- `toNNRat` and `(↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ` form a Galois insertion. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion toNNRat (↑) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro coe_mono toNNRat_mono Rat.le_coe_toNNRat toNNRat_coe
/-- Coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ` as a `RingHom`. -/
def coeHom : ℚ≥0 →+* ℚ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' := coe_mul
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(↑n : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_natCast (n : ℕ) : @Eq ℚ≥0 (⟨(n : ℚ), Nat.cast_nonneg' n⟩ : ℚ≥0) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : ⇑coeHom = ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem nsmul_coe (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ↑(n • q) = n • (q : ℚ) :=
coeHom.toAddMonoidHom.map_nsmul _ _
theorem bddAbove_coe {s : Set ℚ≥0} : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set ℚ) ↔ BddAbove s :=
⟨fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦
⟨toNNRat b, fun ⟨y, _⟩ hys ↦
show y ≤ max b 0 from (hb <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hys).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, fun _ ⟨_, hx, Eq⟩ ↦ Eq ▸ hb hx⟩⟩
theorem bddBelow_coe (s : Set ℚ≥0) : BddBelow (((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) '' s) :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨q, _, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ q.2⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((max x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = max (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_max
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((min x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = min (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_min
theorem sub_def (p q : ℚ≥0) : p - q = toNNRat (p - q) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem abs_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : |(q : ℚ)| = q :=
abs_of_nonneg q.2
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero (q : ℚ≥0) : q ≤ 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
⟨fun h => le_antisymm h q.2, fun h => h.symm ▸ q.2⟩
end NNRat
open NNRat
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_zero : toNNRat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_one : toNNRat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_pos : 0 < toNNRat q ↔ 0 < q := by simp [toNNRat, ← coe_lt_coe]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_eq_zero : toNNRat q = 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by
simpa [-toNNRat_pos] using (@toNNRat_pos q).not
alias ⟨_, toNNRat_of_nonpos⟩ := toNNRat_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_le_toNNRat_iff (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ q ≤ p := by
simp [← coe_le_coe, toNNRat, hp]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff' : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p ∧ 0 < p := by
simp [← coe_lt_coe, toNNRat, lt_irrefl]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff (h : 0 < p) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans (and_iff_left h)
| theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff_of_nonneg (hq : 0 ≤ q) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
| Mathlib/Data/NNRat/Defs.lean | 268 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DualNumber
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuaternionBasis
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Star
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Prod
/-!
# Other constructions isomorphic to Clifford Algebras
This file contains isomorphisms showing that other types are equivalent to some `CliffordAlgebra`.
## Rings
* `CliffordAlgebraRing.equiv`: any ring is equivalent to a `CliffordAlgebra` over a
zero-dimensional vector space.
## Complex numbers
* `CliffordAlgebraComplex.equiv`: the `Complex` numbers are equivalent as an `ℝ`-algebra to a
`CliffordAlgebra` over a one-dimensional vector space with a quadratic form that satisfies
`Q (ι Q 1) = -1`.
* `CliffordAlgebraComplex.toComplex`: the forward direction of this equiv
* `CliffordAlgebraComplex.ofComplex`: the reverse direction of this equiv
We show additionally that this equivalence sends `Complex.conj` to `CliffordAlgebra.involute` and
vice-versa:
* `CliffordAlgebraComplex.toComplex_involute`
* `CliffordAlgebraComplex.ofComplex_conj`
Note that in this algebra `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` is the identity and so the clifford conjugate
is the same as `CliffordAlgebra.involute`.
## Quaternion algebras
* `CliffordAlgebraQuaternion.equiv`: a `QuaternionAlgebra` over `R` is equivalent as an
`R`-algebra to a clifford algebra over `R × R`, sending `i` to `(0, 1)` and `j` to `(1, 0)`.
* `CliffordAlgebraQuaternion.toQuaternion`: the forward direction of this equiv
* `CliffordAlgebraQuaternion.ofQuaternion`: the reverse direction of this equiv
We show additionally that this equivalence sends `QuaternionAlgebra.conj` to the clifford conjugate
and vice-versa:
* `CliffordAlgebraQuaternion.toQuaternion_star`
* `CliffordAlgebraQuaternion.ofQuaternion_star`
## Dual numbers
* `CliffordAlgebraDualNumber.equiv`: `R[ε]` is equivalent as an `R`-algebra to a clifford
algebra over `R` where `Q = 0`.
-/
open CliffordAlgebra
/-! ### The clifford algebra isomorphic to a ring -/
namespace CliffordAlgebraRing
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem ι_eq_zero : ι (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit) = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Since the vector space is empty the ring is commutative. -/
instance : CommRing (CliffordAlgebra (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit)) :=
{ CliffordAlgebra.instRing _ with
mul_comm := fun x y => by
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap r => apply Algebra.commutes
| ι x => simp
| add x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ => rw [mul_add, add_mul, hx₁, hx₂]
| mul x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ => rw [mul_assoc, hx₂, ← mul_assoc, hx₁, ← mul_assoc] }
theorem reverse_apply (x : CliffordAlgebra (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit)) :
x.reverse = x := by
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap r => exact reverse.commutes _
| ι x => rw [ι_eq_zero, LinearMap.zero_apply, reverse.map_zero]
| mul x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ => rw [reverse.map_mul, mul_comm, hx₁, hx₂]
| add x₁ x₂ hx₁ hx₂ => rw [reverse.map_add, hx₁, hx₂]
@[simp]
theorem reverse_eq_id :
(reverse : CliffordAlgebra (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit) →ₗ[R] _) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_apply
@[simp]
theorem involute_eq_id :
(involute : CliffordAlgebra (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit) →ₐ[R] _) = AlgHom.id R _ := by ext; simp
/-- The clifford algebra over a 0-dimensional vector space is isomorphic to its scalars. -/
protected def equiv : CliffordAlgebra (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom
(CliffordAlgebra.lift (0 : QuadraticForm R Unit) <|
⟨0, fun _ : Unit => (zero_mul (0 : R)).trans (algebraMap R _).map_zero.symm⟩)
(Algebra.ofId R _) (by ext)
(by ext : 1; rw [ι_eq_zero, LinearMap.comp_zero, LinearMap.comp_zero])
end CliffordAlgebraRing
/-! ### The clifford algebra isomorphic to the complex numbers -/
namespace CliffordAlgebraComplex
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The quadratic form sending elements to the negation of their square. -/
def Q : QuadraticForm ℝ ℝ :=
-QuadraticMap.sq
@[simp]
theorem Q_apply (r : ℝ) : Q r = -(r * r) :=
rfl
/-- Intermediate result for `CliffordAlgebraComplex.equiv`: clifford algebras over
`CliffordAlgebraComplex.Q` above can be converted to `ℂ`. -/
def toComplex : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[ℝ] ℂ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨LinearMap.toSpanSingleton _ _ Complex.I, fun r => by
dsimp [LinearMap.toSpanSingleton, LinearMap.id]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_ι (r : ℝ) : toComplex (ι Q r) = r • Complex.I :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _ r
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` is analogous to `Complex.conj`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_involute (c : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
toComplex (involute c) = conj (toComplex c) := by
have : toComplex (involute (ι Q 1)) = conj (toComplex (ι Q 1)) := by
simp only [involute_ι, toComplex_ι, map_neg, one_smul, Complex.conj_I]
suffices toComplex.comp involute = Complex.conjAe.toAlgHom.comp toComplex by
exact AlgHom.congr_fun this c
ext : 2
exact this
/-- Intermediate result for `CliffordAlgebraComplex.equiv`: `ℂ` can be converted to
`CliffordAlgebraComplex.Q` above can be converted to. -/
def ofComplex : ℂ →ₐ[ℝ] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
Complex.lift
⟨CliffordAlgebra.ι Q 1, by
rw [CliffordAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar, Q_apply, one_mul, RingHom.map_neg, RingHom.map_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofComplex_I : ofComplex Complex.I = ι Q 1 :=
Complex.liftAux_apply_I _ (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_comp_ofComplex : toComplex.comp ofComplex = AlgHom.id ℝ ℂ := by
ext1
dsimp only [AlgHom.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, AlgHom.id_apply]
rw [ofComplex_I, toComplex_ι, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_ofComplex (c : ℂ) : toComplex (ofComplex c) = c :=
AlgHom.congr_fun toComplex_comp_ofComplex c
@[simp]
theorem ofComplex_comp_toComplex : ofComplex.comp toComplex = AlgHom.id ℝ (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext
| dsimp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, AlgHom.id_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply,
AlgHom.comp_apply]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Equivs.lean | 176 | 177 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
/-!
# Absorption of sets
Let `M` act on `α`, let `A` and `B` be sets in `α`.
We say that `A` *absorbs* `B` if for sufficiently large `a : M`, we have `B ⊆ a • A`.
Formally, "for sufficiently large `a : M`" means "for all but a bounded set of `a`".
Traditionally, this definition is formulated
for the action of a (semi)normed ring on a module over that ring.
We formulate it in a more general settings for two reasons:
- this way we don't have to depend on metric spaces, normed rings etc;
- some proofs look nicer with this definition than with something like
`∃ r : ℝ, ∀ a : R, r ≤ ‖a‖ → B ⊆ a • A`.
If `M` is a `GroupWithZero` (e.g., a division ring),
the sets absorbing a given set form a filter, see `Filter.absorbing`.
## Implementation notes
For now, all theorems assume that we deal with (a generalization of) a module over a division ring.
Some lemmas have multiplicative versions for `MulDistribMulAction`s.
They can be added later when someone needs them.
## Keywords
absorbs, absorbent
-/
assert_not_exists Real
open Set Bornology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
section Defs
variable (M : Type*) {α : Type*} [Bornology M] [SMul M α]
/-- A set `s` absorbs another set `t` if `t` is contained in all scalings of `s`
by all but a bounded set of elements. -/
def Absorbs (s t : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ a in cobounded M, t ⊆ a • s
/-- A set is *absorbent* if it absorbs every singleton. -/
def Absorbent (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ x, Absorbs M s {x}
end Defs
namespace Absorbs
section SMul
variable {M α : Type*} [Bornology M] [SMul M α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Set α} {S T : Set (Set α)}
protected lemma empty : Absorbs M s ∅ := by simp [Absorbs]
protected lemma eventually (h : Absorbs M s t) : ∀ᶠ a in cobounded M, t ⊆ a • s := h
@[simp] lemma of_boundedSpace [BoundedSpace M] : Absorbs M s t := by simp [Absorbs]
lemma mono_left (h : Absorbs M s₁ t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : Absorbs M s₂ t :=
h.mono fun _a ha ↦ ha.trans <| smul_set_mono hs
lemma mono_right (h : Absorbs M s t₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : Absorbs M s t₂ :=
h.mono fun _ ↦ ht.trans
lemma mono (h : Absorbs M s₁ t₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : Absorbs M s₂ t₂ :=
(h.mono_left hs).mono_right ht
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_union : Absorbs M s (t₁ ∪ t₂) ↔ Absorbs M s t₁ ∧ Absorbs M s t₂ := by
simp [Absorbs]
protected lemma union (h₁ : Absorbs M s t₁) (h₂ : Absorbs M s t₂) : Absorbs M s (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
absorbs_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
| lemma _root_.Set.Finite.absorbs_sUnion {T : Set (Set α)} (hT : T.Finite) :
Absorbs M s (⋃₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Absorbs M s t := by
simp [Absorbs, hT]
| Mathlib/Topology/Bornology/Absorbs.lean | 88 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Nailin Guan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Defs
/-!
# Continuous Monoid Homs
This file defines the space of continuous homomorphisms between two topological groups.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMonoidHom A B`: The continuous homomorphisms `A →* B`.
* `ContinuousAddMonoidHom A B`: The continuous additive homomorphisms `A →+ B`.
-/
assert_not_exists ContinuousLinearMap
assert_not_exists ContinuousLinearEquiv
section
open Function Topology
variable (F A B C D E : Type*)
variable [Monoid A] [Monoid B] [Monoid C] [Monoid D]
variable [TopologicalSpace A] [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace C] [TopologicalSpace D]
/-- The type of continuous additive monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ContinuousAddMonoidHom A B)`,
you should parametrize
over `(F : Type*) [FunLike F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B] [AddMonoidHomClass F A B] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure,
make sure to extend `ContinuousMapClass` and/or `AddMonoidHomClass`, if needed. -/
structure ContinuousAddMonoidHom (A B : Type*) [AddMonoid A] [AddMonoid B] [TopologicalSpace A]
[TopologicalSpace B] extends A →+ B, C(A, B)
/-- The type of continuous monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ContinuousMonoidHom A B)`,
you should parametrize
over `(F : Type*) [FunLike F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B] [MonoidHomClass F A B] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure,
make sure to extend `ContinuousMapClass` and/or `MonoidHomClass`, if needed. -/
@[to_additive "The type of continuous additive monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`."]
structure ContinuousMonoidHom extends A →* B, C(A, B)
/-- Reinterpret a `ContinuousMonoidHom` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
add_decl_doc ContinuousMonoidHom.toMonoidHom
/-- Reinterpret a `ContinuousAddMonoidHom` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
add_decl_doc ContinuousAddMonoidHom.toAddMonoidHom
/-- Reinterpret a `ContinuousMonoidHom` as a `ContinuousMap`. -/
add_decl_doc ContinuousMonoidHom.toContinuousMap
/-- Reinterpret a `ContinuousAddMonoidHom` as a `ContinuousMap`. -/
add_decl_doc ContinuousAddMonoidHom.toContinuousMap
namespace ContinuousMonoidHom
/-- The type of continuous monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`.-/
infixr:25 " →ₜ+ " => ContinuousAddMonoidHom
/-- The type of continuous monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`.-/
infixr:25 " →ₜ* " => ContinuousMonoidHom
variable {A B C D E}
@[to_additive]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (A →ₜ* B) A B where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨ _ , _ ⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨⟨ _ , _ ⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
@[to_additive]
instance instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (A →ₜ* B) A B where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
@[to_additive]
instance instContinuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass (A →ₜ* B) A B where
map_continuous f := f.continuous_toFun
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_toMonoidHom (f : A →ₜ* B) : f.toMonoidHom = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_toContinuousMap (f : A →ₜ* B) : f.toContinuousMap = f := rfl
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MonoidHomClass F A B` and `ContinuousMapClass F A B`
into a`ContinuousMonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to
`(A →ₜ* B)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe) "Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying
`AddMonoidHomClass F A B` and `ContinuousMapClass F A B` into a`ContinuousAddMonoidHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `ContinuousAddMonoidHom A B`."]
def toContinuousMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B] (f : F) : A →ₜ* B :=
{ MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom f with }
/-- Any type satisfying `MonoidHomClass` and `ContinuousMapClass` can be cast into
`ContinuousMonoidHom` via `ContinuousMonoidHom.toContinuousMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass` and `ContinuousMapClass` can be cast into
`ContinuousAddMonoidHom` via `ContinuousAddMonoidHom.toContinuousAddMonoidHom`."]
instance [MonoidHomClass F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B] : CoeOut F (A →ₜ* B) :=
⟨ContinuousMonoidHom.toContinuousMonoidHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_coe [MonoidHomClass F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A →ₜ* B) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma toMonoidHom_toContinuousMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B] (f : F) :
((f : A →ₜ* B) : A →* B) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma toContinuousMap_toContinuousMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F A B] [ContinuousMapClass F A B]
| (f : F) : ((f : A →ₜ* B) : C(A, B)) = f := rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/ContinuousMonoidHom.lean | 128 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
/-!
# Ergodic maps and measures
Let `f : α → α` be measure preserving with respect to a measure `μ`. We say `f` is ergodic with
respect to `μ` (or `μ` is ergodic with respect to `f`) if the only measurable sets `s` such that
`f⁻¹' s = s` are either almost empty or full.
In this file we define ergodic maps / measures together with quasi-ergodic maps / measures and
provide some basic API. Quasi-ergodicity is a weaker condition than ergodicity for which the measure
preserving condition is relaxed to quasi measure preserving.
# Main definitions:
* `PreErgodic`: the ergodicity condition without the measure preserving condition. This exists
to share code between the `Ergodic` and `QuasiErgodic` definitions.
* `Ergodic`: the definition of ergodic maps / measures.
* `QuasiErgodic`: the definition of quasi ergodic maps / measures.
* `Ergodic.quasiErgodic`: an ergodic map / measure is quasi ergodic.
* `QuasiErgodic.ae_empty_or_univ'`: when the map is quasi measure preserving, one may relax the
strict invariance condition to almost invariance in the ergodicity condition.
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α}
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be pre-ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if any measurable
strictly invariant set is either almost empty or full. -/
structure PreErgodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop where
aeconst_set ⦃s : Set α⦄ : MeasurableSet s → f ⁻¹' s = s → EventuallyConst s (ae μ)
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if it is measure
preserving and pre-ergodic. -/
structure Ergodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop extends
MeasurePreserving f μ μ, PreErgodic f μ
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be quasi ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if it is quasi
measure preserving and pre-ergodic. -/
structure QuasiErgodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop extends
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ, PreErgodic f μ
variable {f : α → α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace PreErgodic
theorem ae_empty_or_univ (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hfs : f ⁻¹' s = s) :
s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ∨ s =ᵐ[μ] univ := by
simpa only [eventuallyConst_set'] using hf.aeconst_set hs hfs
theorem measure_self_or_compl_eq_zero (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hs' : f ⁻¹' s = s) : μ s = 0 ∨ μ sᶜ = 0 := by
simpa using hf.ae_empty_or_univ hs hs'
theorem ae_mem_or_ae_nmem (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : f ⁻¹' s = s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) ∨ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyConst_set.1 <| hf.aeconst_set hsm hs
/-- On a probability space, the (pre)ergodicity condition is a zero one law. -/
theorem prob_eq_zero_or_one [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hs' : f ⁻¹' s = s) : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = 1 := by
simpa [hs] using hf.measure_self_or_compl_eq_zero hs hs'
theorem of_iterate (n : ℕ) (hf : PreErgodic f^[n] μ) : PreErgodic f μ :=
⟨fun _ hs hs' => hf.aeconst_set hs <| IsFixedPt.preimage_iterate hs' n⟩
theorem smul_measure {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(hf : PreErgodic f μ) (c : R) : PreErgodic f (c • μ) where
aeconst_set _s hs hfs := (hf.aeconst_set hs hfs).anti <| ae_smul_measure_le _
theorem zero_measure (f : α → α) : @PreErgodic α m f 0 where
aeconst_set _ _ _ := by simp
end PreErgodic
namespace MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving
variable {β : Type*} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {μ' : Measure β} {g : α → β}
theorem preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ μ') (hf : PreErgodic f μ)
{f' : β → β} (h_comm : Semiconj g f f') : PreErgodic f' μ' where
aeconst_set s hs₀ hs₁ := by
rw [← hg.aeconst_preimage hs₀.nullMeasurableSet]
apply hf.aeconst_set (hg.measurable hs₀)
rw [← preimage_comp, h_comm.comp_eq, preimage_comp, hs₁]
theorem preErgodic_conjugate_iff {e : α ≃ᵐ β} (h : MeasurePreserving e μ μ') :
PreErgodic (e ∘ f ∘ e.symm) μ' ↔ PreErgodic f μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf => preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate (h.symm e) hf ?_,
fun hf => preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate h hf ?_⟩
· simp [Semiconj]
· simp [Semiconj]
theorem ergodic_conjugate_iff {e : α ≃ᵐ β} (h : MeasurePreserving e μ μ') :
Ergodic (e ∘ f ∘ e.symm) μ' ↔ Ergodic f μ := by
have : MeasurePreserving (e ∘ f ∘ e.symm) μ' μ' ↔ MeasurePreserving f μ μ := by
rw [h.comp_left_iff, (MeasurePreserving.symm e h).comp_right_iff]
replace h : PreErgodic (e ∘ f ∘ e.symm) μ' ↔ PreErgodic f μ := h.preErgodic_conjugate_iff
exact ⟨fun hf => { this.mp hf.toMeasurePreserving, h.mp hf.toPreErgodic with },
fun hf => { this.mpr hf.toMeasurePreserving, h.mpr hf.toPreErgodic with }⟩
end MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving
namespace QuasiErgodic
theorem aeconst_set₀ (hf : QuasiErgodic f μ) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
EventuallyConst s (ae μ) :=
let ⟨_t, h₀, h₁, h₂⟩ := hf.toQuasiMeasurePreserving.exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae hsm hs
(hf.aeconst_set h₀ h₂).congr h₁
/-- For a quasi ergodic map, sets that are almost invariant (rather than strictly invariant) are
still either almost empty or full. -/
theorem ae_empty_or_univ₀ (hf : QuasiErgodic f μ) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ∨ s =ᵐ[μ] univ :=
eventuallyConst_set'.mp <| hf.aeconst_set₀ hsm hs
/-- For a quasi ergodic map, sets that are almost invariant (rather than strictly invariant) are
still either almost empty or full. -/
theorem ae_mem_or_ae_nmem₀ (hf : QuasiErgodic f μ) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) ∨ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyConst_set.mp <| hf.aeconst_set₀ hsm hs
theorem smul_measure {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(hf : QuasiErgodic f μ) (c : R) : QuasiErgodic f (c • μ) :=
⟨hf.1.smul_measure _, hf.2.smul_measure _⟩
theorem zero_measure {f : α → α} (hf : Measurable f) : @QuasiErgodic α m f 0 where
measurable := hf
absolutelyContinuous := by simp
toPreErgodic := .zero_measure f
end QuasiErgodic
namespace Ergodic
/-- An ergodic map is quasi ergodic. -/
theorem quasiErgodic (hf : Ergodic f μ) : QuasiErgodic f μ :=
{ hf.toPreErgodic, hf.toMeasurePreserving.quasiMeasurePreserving with }
/-- See also `Ergodic.ae_empty_or_univ_of_preimage_ae_le`. -/
theorem ae_empty_or_univ_of_preimage_ae_le' (hf : Ergodic f μ) (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
| (hs' : f ⁻¹' s ≤ᵐ[μ] s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ∨ s =ᵐ[μ] univ := by
refine hf.quasiErgodic.ae_empty_or_univ₀ hs ?_
refine ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge hs' (hf.measure_preimage hs).ge ?_ h_fin
exact hs.preimage hf.quasiMeasurePreserving
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Ergodic/Ergodic.lean | 155 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Endomorphism
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Preadditive categories
A preadditive category is a category in which `X ⟶ Y` is an abelian group in such a way that
composition of morphisms is linear in both variables.
This file contains a definition of preadditive category that directly encodes the definition given
above. The definition could also be phrased as follows: A preadditive category is a category
enriched over the category of Abelian groups. Once the general framework to state this in Lean is
available, the contents of this file should become obsolete.
## Main results
* Definition of preadditive categories and basic properties
* In a preadditive category, `f : Q ⟶ R` is mono if and only if `g ≫ f = 0 → g = 0` for all
composable `g`.
* A preadditive category with kernels has equalizers.
## Implementation notes
The simp normal form for negation and composition is to push negations as far as possible to
the outside. For example, `f ≫ (-g)` and `(-f) ≫ g` both become `-(f ≫ g)`, and `(-f) ≫ (-g)`
is simplified to `f ≫ g`.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
## Tags
additive, preadditive, Hom group, Ab-category, Ab-enriched
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- A category is called preadditive if `P ⟶ Q` is an abelian group such that composition is
linear in both variables. -/
@[stacks 00ZY]
class Preadditive where
homGroup : ∀ P Q : C, AddCommGroup (P ⟶ Q) := by infer_instance
add_comp : ∀ (P Q R : C) (f f' : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R), (f + f') ≫ g = f ≫ g + f' ≫ g := by
aesop_cat
comp_add : ∀ (P Q R : C) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g g' : Q ⟶ R), f ≫ (g + g') = f ≫ g + f ≫ g' := by
aesop_cat
attribute [inherit_doc Preadditive] Preadditive.homGroup Preadditive.add_comp Preadditive.comp_add
attribute [instance] Preadditive.homGroup
-- simp can already prove reassoc version
attribute [reassoc, simp] Preadditive.add_comp
attribute [reassoc] Preadditive.comp_add
attribute [simp] Preadditive.comp_add
end CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Preadditive
section Preadditive
open AddMonoidHom
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
section InducedCategory
universe u'
variable {D : Type u'} (F : D → C)
instance inducedCategory : Preadditive.{v} (InducedCategory C F) where
homGroup P Q := @Preadditive.homGroup C _ _ (F P) (F Q)
add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ := add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _ := comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
end InducedCategory
instance fullSubcategory (Z : ObjectProperty C) : Preadditive Z.FullSubcategory where
homGroup P Q := @Preadditive.homGroup C _ _ P.obj Q.obj
add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ := add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _ := comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
instance (X : C) : AddCommGroup (End X) := by
dsimp [End]
infer_instance
/-- Composition by a fixed left argument as a group homomorphism -/
def leftComp {P Q : C} (R : C) (f : P ⟶ Q) : (Q ⟶ R) →+ (P ⟶ R) :=
mk' (fun g => f ≫ g) fun g g' => by simp
/-- Composition by a fixed right argument as a group homomorphism -/
def rightComp (P : C) {Q R : C} (g : Q ⟶ R) : (P ⟶ Q) →+ (P ⟶ R) :=
mk' (fun f => f ≫ g) fun f f' => by simp
variable {P Q R : C} (f f' : P ⟶ Q) (g g' : Q ⟶ R)
/-- Composition as a bilinear group homomorphism -/
def compHom : (P ⟶ Q) →+ (Q ⟶ R) →+ (P ⟶ R) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => leftComp _ f) fun f₁ f₂ =>
AddMonoidHom.ext fun g => (rightComp _ g).map_add f₁ f₂
-- simp can prove the reassoc version
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem sub_comp : (f - f') ≫ g = f ≫ g - f' ≫ g :=
map_sub (rightComp P g) f f'
-- simp can prove the reassoc version
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_sub : f ≫ (g - g') = f ≫ g - f ≫ g' :=
map_sub (leftComp R f) g g'
-- simp can prove the reassoc version
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem neg_comp : (-f) ≫ g = -f ≫ g :=
map_neg (rightComp P g) f
-- simp can prove the reassoc version
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_neg : f ≫ (-g) = -f ≫ g :=
map_neg (leftComp R f) g
@[reassoc]
theorem neg_comp_neg : (-f) ≫ (-g) = f ≫ g := by simp
theorem nsmul_comp (n : ℕ) : (n • f) ≫ g = n • f ≫ g :=
map_nsmul (rightComp P g) n f
theorem comp_nsmul (n : ℕ) : f ≫ (n • g) = n • f ≫ g :=
map_nsmul (leftComp R f) n g
theorem zsmul_comp (n : ℤ) : (n • f) ≫ g = n • f ≫ g :=
map_zsmul (rightComp P g) n f
theorem comp_zsmul (n : ℤ) : f ≫ (n • g) = n • f ≫ g :=
map_zsmul (leftComp R f) n g
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_sum {P Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
(f ≫ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ≫ g j :=
map_sum (leftComp R f) _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem sum_comp {P Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : J → (P ⟶ Q)) (g : Q ⟶ R) :
(∑ j ∈ s, f j) ≫ g = ∑ j ∈ s, f j ≫ g :=
map_sum (rightComp P g) _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem sum_comp' {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : J → (P ⟶ Q)) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R))
(h : R ⟶ S) : (∑ j ∈ s, f j ≫ g j) ≫ h = ∑ j ∈ s, f j ≫ g j ≫ h := by
simp only [← Category.assoc]
apply sum_comp
instance {P Q : C} {f : P ⟶ Q} [Epi f] : Epi (-f) :=
⟨fun g g' H => by rwa [neg_comp, neg_comp, ← comp_neg, ← comp_neg, cancel_epi, neg_inj] at H⟩
instance {P Q : C} {f : P ⟶ Q} [Mono f] : Mono (-f) :=
⟨fun g g' H => by rwa [comp_neg, comp_neg, ← neg_comp, ← neg_comp, cancel_mono, neg_inj] at H⟩
instance (priority := 100) preadditiveHasZeroMorphisms : HasZeroMorphisms C where
zero := inferInstance
comp_zero f R := show leftComp R f 0 = 0 from map_zero _
zero_comp P _ _ f := show rightComp P f 0 = 0 from map_zero _
/-- Porting note: adding this before the ring instance allowed moduleEndRight to find
the correct Monoid structure on End. Moved both down after preadditiveHasZeroMorphisms
to make use of them -/
instance {X : C} : Semiring (End X) :=
{ End.monoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by dsimp [mul]; exact HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero f _
mul_zero := fun f => by dsimp [mul]; exact HasZeroMorphisms.zero_comp _ f
left_distrib := fun f g h => Preadditive.add_comp X X X g h f
right_distrib := fun f g h => Preadditive.comp_add X X X h f g }
/-- Porting note: It looks like Ring's parent classes changed in
Lean 4 so the previous instance needed modification. Was following my nose here. -/
instance {X : C} : Ring (End X) :=
{ (inferInstance : Semiring (End X)),
(inferInstance : AddCommGroup (End X)) with
neg_add_cancel := neg_add_cancel }
instance moduleEndRight {X Y : C} : Module (End Y) (X ⟶ Y) where
smul_add _ _ _ := add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
smul_zero _ := zero_comp
add_smul _ _ _ := comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
zero_smul _ := comp_zero
theorem mono_of_cancel_zero {Q R : C} (f : Q ⟶ R) (h : ∀ {P : C} (g : P ⟶ Q), g ≫ f = 0 → g = 0) :
Mono f where
right_cancellation := fun {Z} g₁ g₂ hg =>
sub_eq_zero.1 <| h _ <| (map_sub (rightComp Z f) g₁ g₂).trans <| sub_eq_zero.2 hg
theorem mono_iff_cancel_zero {Q R : C} (f : Q ⟶ R) :
Mono f ↔ ∀ (P : C) (g : P ⟶ Q), g ≫ f = 0 → g = 0 :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => zero_of_comp_mono _, mono_of_cancel_zero f⟩
theorem mono_of_kernel_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)]
(w : kernel.ι f = 0) : Mono f :=
mono_of_cancel_zero f fun g h => by rw [← kernel.lift_ι f g h, w, Limits.comp_zero]
lemma mono_of_isZero_kernel' {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f) (hc : IsLimit c)
(h : IsZero c.pt) : Mono f := mono_of_cancel_zero _ (fun g hg => by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hc _ hg
rw [← ha, h.eq_of_tgt a 0, Limits.zero_comp])
lemma mono_of_isZero_kernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] (h : IsZero (kernel f)) :
Mono f :=
mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ (kernelIsKernel _) h
theorem epi_of_cancel_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (h : ∀ {R : C} (g : Q ⟶ R), f ≫ g = 0 → g = 0) :
Epi f :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' hg =>
sub_eq_zero.1 <| h _ <| (map_sub (leftComp Z f) g g').trans <| sub_eq_zero.2 hg⟩
theorem epi_iff_cancel_zero {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
Epi f ↔ ∀ (R : C) (g : Q ⟶ R), f ≫ g = 0 → g = 0 :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => zero_of_epi_comp _, epi_of_cancel_zero f⟩
theorem epi_of_cokernel_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)]
(w : cokernel.π f = 0) : Epi f :=
epi_of_cancel_zero f fun g h => by rw [← cokernel.π_desc f g h, w, Limits.zero_comp]
lemma epi_of_isZero_cokernel' {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : CokernelCofork f) (hc : IsColimit c)
(h : IsZero c.pt) : Epi f := epi_of_cancel_zero _ (fun g hg => by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hc _ hg
rw [← ha, h.eq_of_src a 0, Limits.comp_zero])
lemma epi_of_isZero_cokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasCokernel f] (h : IsZero (cokernel f)) :
Epi f :=
epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ (cokernelIsCokernel _) h
namespace IsIso
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_eq_zero [IsIso f] : f ≫ g = 0 ↔ g = 0 := by
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp, Limits.comp_zero]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_eq_zero [IsIso g] : f ≫ g = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [← IsIso.eq_comp_inv, Limits.zero_comp]
end IsIso
open ZeroObject
variable [HasZeroObject C]
theorem mono_of_kernel_iso_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)]
(w : kernel f ≅ 0) : Mono f :=
mono_of_kernel_zero (zero_of_source_iso_zero _ w)
theorem epi_of_cokernel_iso_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)]
(w : cokernel f ≅ 0) : Epi f :=
epi_of_cokernel_zero (zero_of_target_iso_zero _ w)
end Preadditive
section Equalizers
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
section
variable {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Y}
/-- Map a kernel cone on the difference of two morphisms to the equalizer fork. -/
@[simps! pt]
def forkOfKernelFork (c : KernelFork (f - g)) : Fork f g :=
Fork.ofι c.ι <| by rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← comp_sub, c.condition]
@[simp]
theorem forkOfKernelFork_ι (c : KernelFork (f - g)) : (forkOfKernelFork c).ι = c.ι :=
rfl
/-- Map any equalizer fork to a cone on the difference of the two morphisms. -/
def kernelForkOfFork (c : Fork f g) : KernelFork (f - g) :=
Fork.ofι c.ι <| by rw [comp_sub, comp_zero, sub_eq_zero, c.condition]
@[simp]
theorem kernelForkOfFork_ι (c : Fork f g) : (kernelForkOfFork c).ι = c.ι :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem kernelForkOfFork_ofι {P : C} (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) :
kernelForkOfFork (Fork.ofι ι w) = KernelFork.ofι ι (by simp [w]) :=
rfl
/-- A kernel of `f - g` is an equalizer of `f` and `g`. -/
def isLimitForkOfKernelFork {c : KernelFork (f - g)} (i : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (forkOfKernelFork c) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨i.lift (kernelForkOfFork s), i.fac _ _, fun h => by apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; aesop_cat⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLimitForkOfKernelFork_lift {c : KernelFork (f - g)} (i : IsLimit c) (s : Fork f g) :
(isLimitForkOfKernelFork i).lift s = i.lift (kernelForkOfFork s) :=
rfl
/-- An equalizer of `f` and `g` is a kernel of `f - g`. -/
def isLimitKernelForkOfFork {c : Fork f g} (i : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (kernelForkOfFork c) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨i.lift (forkOfKernelFork s), i.fac _ _, fun h => by apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; aesop_cat⟩
variable (f g)
/-- A preadditive category has an equalizer for `f` and `g` if it has a kernel for `f - g`. -/
theorem hasEqualizer_of_hasKernel [HasKernel (f - g)] : HasEqualizer f g :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := forkOfKernelFork _
isLimit := isLimitForkOfKernelFork (equalizerIsEqualizer (f - g) 0) }
/-- A preadditive category has a kernel for `f - g` if it has an equalizer for `f` and `g`. -/
theorem hasKernel_of_hasEqualizer [HasEqualizer f g] : HasKernel (f - g) :=
| HasLimit.mk
{ cone := kernelForkOfFork (equalizer.fork f g)
isLimit := isLimitKernelForkOfFork (limit.isLimit (parallelPair f g)) }
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Basic.lean | 338 | 340 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
rw [eLpNorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
obtain hμ_top | hμ_ne_top := eq_or_ne (μ .univ) ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simpa [hμ, hc, hμ_ne_top, hμ_ne_top.lt_top, hc, hc'.lt_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_ne_top
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
theorem memLp_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [eLpNorm_const c h0 hμ]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc.lt_top (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp)
(measure_ne_top μ Set.univ))
theorem memLp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ :=
memLp_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const := memLp_const
theorem memLp_top_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) ∞ μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, by by_cases h : μ = 0 <;> simp [eLpNorm_const _, h, hc.lt_top]⟩
theorem memLp_top_const (c : E) : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) ∞ μ :=
memLp_top_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_top_const := memLp_top_const
theorem memLp_const_iff_enorm
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : ε''} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
simp_all [MemLp, aestronglyMeasurable_const,
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm hc hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
theorem memLp_const_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : E} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
memLp_const_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const_iff := memLp_const_iff
end Const
variable {f : α → F}
lemma eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
gcongr
lemma eLpNorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
dsimp [enorm]
gcongr
theorem eLpNorm'_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae hq (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_enorm_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ = ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ := by
have : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] (‖g ·‖ₑ ^ q) := hfg.mono fun x hx ↦ by simp [hx]
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_congr_ae this]
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ := by
have : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] (‖g ·‖ₑ ^ q) := hfg.mono fun x hx ↦ by simp [enorm, hx]
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_congr_ae this]
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_norm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_congr_enorm_ae (hfg.fun_comp _)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ = eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp enorm)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_enorm_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
theorem eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae h
· exact eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
theorem eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx)
· exact eLpNorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae' {ε' : Type*} [ENorm ε']
{f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae <| h.mono fun _x hx =>
hx.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (Real.norm_eq_abs _).symm.le)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_enorm {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae_real (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_enorm_bound {f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0∞} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le C hfC
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le (C : ℝ≥0∞) <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_enorm_bound {f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_enorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_enorm_bound {ε} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
{f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0∞} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖C‖ₑ := hfC.mono fun x hx ↦ hx.trans (Preorder.le_refl C)
refine (eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), one_div, enorm_eq_self, smul_eq_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖(C : ℝ)‖₊ := hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans_eq C.nnnorm_eq.symm
refine (eLpNorm_mono_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), C.enorm_eq, one_div, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * ENNReal.ofReal C := by
rw [← mul_comm]
exact eLpNorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound (hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ = ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem eLpNorm_indicator_sub_indicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) :
eLpNorm (s.indicator f - t.indicator f) p μ = eLpNorm ((s ∆ t).indicator f) p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae <| ae_of_all _ fun x ↦ by simp [Set.apply_indicator_symmDiff norm_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_norm {f : α → F} : eLpNorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_enorm {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖ₑ) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_norm (f : α → F) : eLpNorm (fun x => ‖f x‖) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => norm_norm _
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_enorm (f : α → ε) : eLpNorm (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ₑ) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => enorm_enorm _
theorem eLpNorm'_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (p q : ℝ) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ q) p μ = eLpNorm' f (p * q) μ ^ q := by
simp_rw [eLpNorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← one_div_mul_one_div, one_div,
mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ hq_pos.ne.symm, mul_one, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), mul_comm p,
| ← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hq_pos.le, ENNReal.rpow_mul]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 501 | 501 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Control.EquivFunctor
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Equivalences for `Option α`
We define
* `Equiv.optionCongr`: the `Option α ≃ Option β` constructed from `e : α ≃ β` by sending `none` to
`none`, and applying `e` elsewhere.
* `Equiv.removeNone`: the `α ≃ β` constructed from `Option α ≃ Option β` by removing `none` from
both sides.
-/
universe u
namespace Equiv
open Option
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section OptionCongr
/-- A universe-polymorphic version of `EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Option α ≃ Option β where
toFun := Option.map e
invFun := Option.map e.symm
left_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.symm_comp_self.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
right_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.self_comp_symm.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_refl : optionCongr (Equiv.refl α) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext <| congr_fun Option.map_id
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) : (optionCongr e).symm = optionCongr e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) :
(optionCongr e₁).trans (optionCongr e₂) = optionCongr (e₁.trans e₂) :=
ext <| Option.map_map _ _
/-- When `α` and `β` are in the same universe, this is the same as the result of
`EquivFunctor.mapEquiv`. -/
theorem optionCongr_eq_equivFunctor_mapEquiv {α β : Type u} (e : α ≃ β) :
optionCongr e = EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e :=
rfl
end OptionCongr
section RemoveNone
variable (e : Option α ≃ Option β)
/-- If we have a value on one side of an `Equiv` of `Option`
we also have a value on the other side of the equivalence
-/
def removeNone_aux (x : α) : β :=
if h : (e (some x)).isSome then Option.get _ h
else
Option.get _ <|
show (e none).isSome by
rw [← Option.ne_none_iff_isSome]
intro hn
rw [Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none, ← hn] at h
exact Option.some_ne_none _ (e.injective h)
theorem removeNone_aux_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e (some x) := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.isSome_iff_exists.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e none := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_inv (x : α) : removeNone_aux e.symm (removeNone_aux e x) = x :=
Option.some_injective _
(by
| cases h1 : e.symm (some (removeNone_aux e x)) <;> cases h2 : e (some x)
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h1]
exact (e.eq_symm_apply.mpr h2).symm
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Option.lean | 89 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [continuousOn_iff']
constructor
· intro h t ht
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu]
apply IsOpen.inter u_open hs
· intro h t ht
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, ?_⟩
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self]
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
(continuousOn_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_preimage {t : Set β} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hp : f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) := by
convert (continuousOn_open_iff hs).mp h t ht
rw [inter_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hp]
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rcases continuousOn_iff_isClosed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu.2]
apply IsClosed.inter hu.1 hs
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
calc
s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter (Subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
(hf.isOpen_inter_preimage hs isOpen_interior)
_ = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) := by rw [interior_inter, hs.interior_eq]
theorem continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ContinuousOn f (s ∩ t)) : ContinuousOn f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩
rwa [ContinuousWithinAt, ← nhdsWithin_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
theorem continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ T, f x ∈ t → f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
forall₂_congr fun x _ => by
delta ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun t => forall_swap
theorem continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ T, IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t)) :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s :=
continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff.2 fun _x hx t ht hxt => mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨_, h t ht, ⟨hx, hxt⟩, fun _y hy => hy.1.2⟩
/-!
### Congruence and monotonicity properties with respect to sets
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
/-- If two sets coincide around `x`, then being continuous within one or the other at `x` is
equivalent. See also `continuousWithinAt_congr_set'` which requires that the sets coincide
locally away from a point `y`, in a T1 space. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq.mpr h]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_set (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f t x :=
(continuousWithinAt_congr_set h).1 hf
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_union :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
/- `continuousWithinAt_insert` gives the same equivalence but at a point `y` possibly different
from `x`. As this requires the space to be T1, and this property is not available in this file,
this is found in another file although it is part of the basic API for `continuousWithinAt`. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h => (h.union ht).mono <| by simp only [diff_union_self, subset_union_left], fun h =>
h.mono diff_subset⟩
/-- See also `continuousWithinAt_diff_singleton` for the case of `s \ {y}`, but
requiring `T1Space α. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_diff_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ {x}) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_singleton.diff_iff
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_compl_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f {x}ᶜ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, continuousWithinAt_diff_self, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousOn.mono (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (hf x (h hx)).mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono _ h)
theorem antitone_continuousOn {f : α → β} : Antitone (ContinuousOn f) := fun _s _t hst hf =>
hf.mono hst
/-!
### Relation between `ContinuousAt` and `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
theorem ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
ContinuousWithinAt.mono ((continuousWithinAt_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [← univ_inter s, continuousWithinAt_inter h, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt hs).mp h
theorem IsOpen.continuousOn_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ContinuousAt f a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt ∘ hs.mem_nhds
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousAt (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).continuousAt hx
theorem continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (hcont x hx).continuousWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContinuousAt.continuousOn := continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.continuousOn (h : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at h
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
theorem Continuous.continuousWithinAt (h : Continuous f) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-!
### Congruence properties with respect to functions
-/
theorem ContinuousOn.congr_mono (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn g s₁ := by
intro x hx
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at A
rw [← h' hx] at A
exact A.congr' h'.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin.symm
theorem ContinuousOn.congr (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (Subset.refl _)
theorem continuousOn_congr (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
⟨fun h => ContinuousOn.congr h h'.symm, fun h => h.congr h'⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : f x = g x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx, tendsto_congr' h, ContinuousWithinAt]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
(h₁.congr_continuousWithinAt hx).2 h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_mem (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h.symm hx,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) h₁)
(mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_insert (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] g) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h.symm,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : g x = f x) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin h₁) hx
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr (fun x hx ↦ (h₁ x hx).symm) hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_of_mem (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_insert (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, g y = f y) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_of_insert
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, g y = f y) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_mono
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s₁ x :=
(h.mono h₁).congr h' hx
theorem ContinuousAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : g =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
ContinuousAt g x := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ] at h ⊢
exact h.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (by rwa [nhdsWithin_univ]) (mem_univ x)
/-!
### Composition
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin h)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : f x = y) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp hf h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_inter {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_inter_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_inter hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within f hf h)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x)
(hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin hf h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hs).comp hf (mapsTo_image f s)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] y) (hy : f x = y) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image hf hs
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt {g : β → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.continuousWithinAt.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt_of_eq {g : β → γ} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_continuousWithinAt hf
/-- See also `ContinuousOn.comp'` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)` instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx =>
ContinuousWithinAt.comp (hg _ (h hx)) (hf x hx) h
/-- Variant of `ContinuousOn.comp` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)` instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (fun x => g (f x)) s :=
ContinuousOn.comp hg hf h
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp_inter {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
/-- See also `Continuous.comp_continuousOn'` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)`
instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
theorem Continuous.comp_continuousOn {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.continuousOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
/-- Variant of `Continuous.comp_continuousOn` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)`
instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.comp_continuousOn' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ g (f x)) s :=
hg.comp_continuousOn hf
theorem ContinuousOn.comp_continuous {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : Continuous (g ∘ f) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at *
exact hg.comp hf fun x _ => hs x
theorem ContinuousOn.image_comp_continuous {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hg : ContinuousOn g (f '' s)) (hf : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.comp hf.continuousOn (s.mapsTo_image f)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_continuousWithinAt {f : β × γ → δ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} {x : α}
{s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hh : ContinuousWithinAt h s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) s x :=
ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt hf (hg.prodMk_nhds hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_continuousWithinAt_of_eq {f : β × γ → δ} {g : α → β}
{h : α → γ} {x : α} {s : Set α} {y : β × γ} (hf : ContinuousAt f y)
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) (hh : ContinuousWithinAt h s x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) s x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂_continuousWithinAt hg hh
/-!
### Image
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
haveI := mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 hx
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_preimage_image f s)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : f x ∈ closure t :=
closure_mono (image_subset_iff.2 ht) (h.mem_closure_image hx)
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousWithinAt {t : Set β}
(h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) := fun x hx => (hc x hx).mem_closure hx h
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousOn {t : Set β} (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) : MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) :=
h.closure_of_continuousWithinAt fun x hx => (hc x hx).mono subset_closure
|
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.image_closure
(hf : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
((mapsTo_image f s).closure_of_continuousWithinAt hf).image_subset
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 1,036 | 1,039 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Data.Vector3
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PellMatiyasevic
/-!
# Diophantine functions and Matiyasevic's theorem
Hilbert's tenth problem asked whether there exists an algorithm which for a given integer polynomial
determines whether this polynomial has integer solutions. It was answered in the negative in 1970,
the final step being completed by Matiyasevic who showed that the power function is Diophantine.
Here a function is called Diophantine if its graph is Diophantine as a set. A subset `S ⊆ ℕ ^ α` in
turn is called Diophantine if there exists an integer polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff
there exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
## Main definitions
* `IsPoly`: a predicate stating that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
* `Poly`: the type of multivariate integer polynomial functions.
* `Dioph`: a predicate stating that a set is Diophantine, i.e. a set `S ⊆ ℕ^α` is
Diophantine if there exists a polynomial on `α ⊕ β` such that `v ∈ S` iff there
exists `t : ℕ^β` with `p (v, t) = 0`.
* `DiophFn`: a predicate on a function stating that it is Diophantine in the sense that its graph
is Diophantine as a set.
## Main statements
* `pell_dioph` states that solutions to Pell's equation form a Diophantine set.
* `pow_dioph` states that the power function is Diophantine, a version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevic's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
## TODO
* Finish the solution of Hilbert's tenth problem.
* Connect `Poly` to `MvPolynomial`
-/
open Fin2 Function Nat Sum
local infixr:67 " ::ₒ " => Option.elim'
local infixr:65 " ⊗ " => Sum.elim
universe u
/-!
### Multivariate integer polynomials
Note that this duplicates `MvPolynomial`.
-/
section Polynomials
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A predicate asserting that a function is a multivariate integer polynomial.
(We are being a bit lazy here by allowing many representations for multiplication,
rather than only allowing monomials and addition, but the definition is equivalent
and this is easier to use.) -/
inductive IsPoly : ((α → ℕ) → ℤ) → Prop
| proj : ∀ i, IsPoly fun x : α → ℕ => x i
| const : ∀ n : ℤ, IsPoly fun _ : α → ℕ => n
| sub : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x - g x
| mul : ∀ {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ}, IsPoly f → IsPoly g → IsPoly fun x => f x * g x
theorem IsPoly.neg {f : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} : IsPoly f → IsPoly (-f) := by
rw [← zero_sub]; exact (IsPoly.const 0).sub
| theorem IsPoly.add {f g : (α → ℕ) → ℤ} (hf : IsPoly f) (hg : IsPoly g) : IsPoly (f + g) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add]; exact hf.sub hg.neg
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Dioph.lean | 85 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
/-!
# Homogeneous Localization
## Notation
- `ι` is a commutative monoid;
- `R` is a commutative semiring;
- `A` is a commutative ring and an `R`-algebra;
- `𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A` is the grading of `A`;
- `x : Submonoid A` is a submonoid
## Main definitions and results
This file constructs the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and denominator have the same grading,
i.e. `{a/b ∈ Aₓ | ∃ (i : ι), a ∈ 𝒜ᵢ ∧ b ∈ 𝒜ᵢ}`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg`: a structure with a numerator and denominator field
where they are required to have the same grading.
However `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` cannot have a ring structure for many reasons, for example if `c`
is a `NumDenSameDeg`, then generally, `c + (-c)` is not necessarily `0` for degree reasons ---
`0` is considered to have grade zero (see `deg_zero`) but `c + (-c)` has the same degree as `c`. To
circumvent this, we quotient `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` by the kernel of `c ↦ c.num / c.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding`: for `x : Submonoid A` and any
`c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a denominator of the same degree,
we get an element `c.num / c.den` of `Aₓ`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization`: `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` quotiented by kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.val`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.val` is an element
of `Aₓ`. In another word, one can view `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as a subring of `Aₓ`
through `HomogeneousLocalization.val`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.num : A` is the
numerator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.den : A` is the
denominator of `f`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then `f.deg : ι` is the
degree of `f` such that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg` and `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`
(see `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg` and `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`).
* `HomogeneousLocalization.num_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.num_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.den_mem_deg`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.den_mem_deg` is a proof that `f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.eq_num_div_den`: if `f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`, then
`f.val : Aₓ` is equal to `f.num / f.den`.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.isLocalRing`: `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is a local ring when `x` is
the complement of some prime ideals.
* `HomogeneousLocalization.map`: Let `A` and `B` be two graded rings and `g : A → B` a grading
preserving ring map. If `P ≤ A` and `Q ≤ B` are submonoids such that `P ≤ g⁻¹(Q)`, then `g`
induces a ring map between the homogeneous localization of `A` at `P` and the homogeneous
localization of `B` at `Q`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
noncomputable section
open DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike
variable {ι R A : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ι → Submodule R A)
variable (x : Submonoid A)
local notation "at " x => Localization x
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
section
/-- Let `x` be a submonoid of `A`, then `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` is a structure with a numerator and a
denominator with same grading such that the denominator is contained in `x`.
-/
structure NumDenSameDeg where
deg : ι
(num den : 𝒜 deg)
den_mem : (den : A) ∈ x
end
namespace NumDenSameDeg
open SetLike.GradedMonoid Submodule
variable {𝒜}
@[ext]
theorem ext {c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x} (hdeg : c1.deg = c2.deg) (hnum : (c1.num : A) = c2.num)
(hden : (c1.den : A) = c2.den) : c1 = c2 := by
rcases c1 with ⟨i1, ⟨n1, hn1⟩, ⟨d1, hd1⟩, h1⟩
rcases c2 with ⟨i2, ⟨n2, hn2⟩, ⟨d2, hd2⟩, h2⟩
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at *
subst hdeg hnum hden
congr
instance : Neg (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
neg c := ⟨c.deg, ⟨-c.num, neg_mem c.num.2⟩, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (-c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).num : A) = -c.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_neg (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((-c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
instance : SMul α (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
smul m c := ⟨c.deg, m • c.num, c.den, c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : (m • c).deg = c.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).num : A) = m • c.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_smul (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : ((m • c).den : A) = c.den :=
rfl
end SMul
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι] [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
instance : One (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one :=
{ deg := 0
-- Porting note: Changed `one_mem` to `GradedOne.one_mem`
num := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den := ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.one_mem _ }
@[simp]
theorem deg_one : (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num : A) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_one : ((1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Zero (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
zero := ⟨0, 0, ⟨1, GradedOne.one_mem⟩, Submonoid.one_mem _⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).deg = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_zero : (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).num = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_zero : ((0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x).den : A) = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Mul (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
mul p q :=
{ deg := p.deg + q.deg
-- Porting note: Changed `mul_mem` to `GradedMul.mul_mem`
num := ⟨p.num * q.num, GradedMul.mul_mem p.num.prop q.num.prop⟩
den := ⟨p.den * q.den, GradedMul.mul_mem p.den.prop q.den.prop⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ p.den_mem q.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 * c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).num : A) = c1.num * c2.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_mul (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 * c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
instance : Add (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
add c1 c2 :=
{ deg := c1.deg + c2.deg
num := ⟨c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num,
add_mem (GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.num.2)
(add_comm c2.deg c1.deg ▸ GradedMul.mul_mem c2.den.2 c1.num.2)⟩
den := ⟨c1.den * c2.den, GradedMul.mul_mem c1.den.2 c2.den.2⟩
den_mem := Submonoid.mul_mem _ c1.den_mem c2.den_mem }
@[simp]
theorem deg_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : (c1 + c2).deg = c1.deg + c2.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
((c1 + c2).num : A) = c1.den * c2.num + c2.den * c1.num :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_add (c1 c2 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : ((c1 + c2).den : A) = c1.den * c2.den :=
rfl
instance : CommMonoid (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := ext _ (add_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _) (mul_assoc _ _ _)
one_mul _ := ext _ (zero_add _) (one_mul _) (one_mul _)
mul_one _ := ext _ (add_zero _) (mul_one _) (mul_one _)
mul_comm _ _ := ext _ (add_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _) (mul_comm _ _)
instance : Pow (NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow c n :=
⟨n • c.deg, @GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.num,
@GradedMonoid.GMonoid.gnpow _ (fun i => ↥(𝒜 i)) _ _ n _ c.den, by
induction' n with n ih
· simpa only [coe_gnpow, pow_zero] using Submonoid.one_mem _
· simpa only [pow_succ, coe_gnpow] using x.mul_mem ih c.den_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem deg_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : (c ^ n).deg = n • c.deg :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem num_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).num : A) = (c.num : A) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem den_pow (c : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : ((c ^ n).den : A) = (c.den : A) ^ n :=
rfl
variable (𝒜)
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A` and any `p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x`, or equivalent a numerator and a
denominator of the same degree, we get an element `p.num / p.den` of `Aₓ`.
-/
def embedding (p : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Localization.mk p.num ⟨p.den, p.den_mem⟩
end NumDenSameDeg
end HomogeneousLocalization
/-- For `x : prime ideal of A`, `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` is `NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x` modulo the
kernel of `embedding 𝒜 x`. This is essentially the subring of `Aₓ` where the numerator and
denominator share the same grading.
-/
def HomogeneousLocalization : Type _ :=
Quotient (Setoid.ker <| HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x)
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
open HomogeneousLocalization HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
variable {𝒜} {x}
/-- Construct an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` from a homogeneous fraction. -/
abbrev mk (y : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x :=
Quotient.mk'' y
lemma mk_surjective : Function.Surjective (mk (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective
/-- View an element of `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` as an element of `Aₓ` by forgetting that the
numerator and denominator are of the same grading.
-/
def val (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : at x :=
Quotient.liftOn' y (NumDenSameDeg.embedding 𝒜 x) fun _ _ => id
@[simp]
theorem val_mk (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) :
val (mk i) = Localization.mk (i.num : A) ⟨i.den, i.den_mem⟩ :=
rfl
variable (x)
@[ext]
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (HomogeneousLocalization.val (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)) :=
fun a b => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' a b fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound' h
variable (𝒜) {x} in
lemma subsingleton (hx : 0 ∈ x) : Subsingleton (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
have := IsLocalization.subsingleton (S := at x) hx
(HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective (𝒜 := 𝒜) (x := x)).subsingleton
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α R] [SMul α A] [IsScalarTower α R A]
variable [IsScalarTower α A A]
instance : SMul α (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
smul m := Quotient.map' (m • ·) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_smul, den_smul]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => m • z) h <;> rw [Localization.smul_mk]
@[simp] lemma mk_smul (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (m : α) : mk (m • i) = m • mk i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_smul (n : α) : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (n • y).val = n • y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ by rw [← mk_smul, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.smul_mk]; rfl
theorem val_nsmul (n : ℕ) (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (n • y).val = n • y.val := by
rw [val_smul, OreLocalization.nsmul_eq_nsmul]
theorem val_zsmul (n : ℤ) (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (n • y).val = n • y.val := by
rw [val_smul, OreLocalization.zsmul_eq_zsmul]
end SMul
instance : Neg (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
neg := Quotient.map' Neg.neg fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_neg, den_neg, ← Localization.neg_mk]
exact congr_arg Neg.neg h
@[simp] lemma mk_neg (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (-i) = -mk i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg {x} : ∀ y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (-y).val = -y.val :=
Quotient.ind' fun y ↦ by rw [← mk_neg, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.neg_mk]; rfl
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι] [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
instance hasPow : Pow (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) ℕ where
pow z n :=
(Quotient.map' (· ^ n) fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_pow, den_pow]
convert congr_arg (fun z : at x => z ^ n) h <;> rw [Localization.mk_pow] <;> rfl :
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x → HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x)
z
@[simp] lemma mk_pow (i : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ) : mk (i ^ n) = mk i ^ n := rfl
instance : Add (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
add :=
Quotient.map₂ (· + ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_add, den_add, ← Localization.add_mk]
convert congr_arg₂ (· + ·) h h' <;> rw [Localization.add_mk] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_add (i j : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (i + j) = mk i + mk j := rfl
instance : Sub (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where sub z1 z2 := z1 + -z2
instance : Mul (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where
mul :=
Quotient.map₂ (· * ·)
fun c1 c2 (h : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) c3 c4
(h' : Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _) => by
change Localization.mk _ _ = Localization.mk _ _
simp only [num_mul, den_mul]
convert congr_arg₂ (· * ·) h h' <;> rw [Localization.mk_mul] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_mul (i j : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) : mk (i * j) = mk i * mk j := rfl
instance : One (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where one := Quotient.mk'' 1
@[simp] lemma mk_one : mk (1 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) = 1 := rfl
instance : Zero (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) where zero := Quotient.mk'' 0
@[simp] lemma mk_zero : mk (0 : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_eq : (0 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = Quotient.mk'' 0 :=
rfl
theorem one_eq : (1 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = Quotient.mk'' 1 :=
rfl
variable {x}
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : (0 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = 0 :=
Localization.mk_zero _
@[simp]
theorem val_one : (1 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = 1 :=
Localization.mk_one
@[simp]
theorem val_add : ∀ y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (y1 + y2).val = y1.val + y2.val :=
Quotient.ind₂' fun y1 y2 ↦ by rw [← mk_add, val_mk, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.add_mk]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_mul : ∀ y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x, (y1 * y2).val = y1.val * y2.val :=
Quotient.ind₂' fun y1 y2 ↦ by rw [← mk_mul, val_mk, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.mk_mul]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_sub (y1 y2 : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : (y1 - y2).val = y1.val - y2.val := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← val_neg, ← val_add]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_pow : ∀ (y : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) (n : ℕ), (y ^ n).val = y.val ^ n :=
Quotient.ind' fun y n ↦ by rw [← mk_pow, val_mk, val_mk, Localization.mk_pow]; rfl
instance : NatCast (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
⟨Nat.unaryCast⟩
instance : IntCast (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
⟨Int.castDef⟩
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = n :=
show val (Nat.unaryCast n) = _ by induction n <;> simp [Nat.unaryCast, *]
@[simp]
theorem val_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x).val = n :=
show val (Int.castDef n) = _ by cases n <;> simp [Int.castDef, *]
instance homogeneousLocalizationCommRing : CommRing (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
(HomogeneousLocalization.val_injective x).commRing _ val_zero val_one val_add val_mul val_neg
val_sub (val_nsmul x · ·) (val_zsmul x · ·) val_pow val_natCast val_intCast
instance homogeneousLocalizationAlgebra :
Algebra (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) (Localization x) where
smul p q := p.val * q
algebraMap :=
{ toFun := val
map_one' := val_one
map_mul' := val_mul
map_zero' := val_zero
map_add' := val_add }
commutes' _ _ := mul_comm _ _
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_apply (y) :
algebraMap (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) (Localization x) y = y.val := rfl
lemma mk_eq_zero_of_num (f : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (h : f.num = 0) : mk f = 0 := by
apply val_injective
simp only [val_mk, val_zero, h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, Localization.mk_zero]
lemma mk_eq_zero_of_den (f : NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x) (h : f.den = 0) : mk f = 0 := by
have := subsingleton 𝒜 (h ▸ f.den_mem)
exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
variable (𝒜 x) in
/-- The map from `𝒜 0` to the degree `0` part of `𝒜ₓ` sending `f ↦ f/1`. -/
def fromZeroRingHom : 𝒜 0 →+* HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x where
toFun f := .mk ⟨0, f, 1, one_mem _⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' f g := by ext; simp [Localization.mk_mul]
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' f g := by ext; simp [Localization.add_mk, add_comm f.1 g.1]
instance : Algebra (𝒜 0) (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :=
(fromZeroRingHom 𝒜 x).toAlgebra
lemma algebraMap_eq : algebraMap (𝒜 0) (HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) = fromZeroRingHom 𝒜 x := rfl
end HomogeneousLocalization
namespace HomogeneousLocalization
open HomogeneousLocalization HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg
variable {𝒜} {x}
/-- Numerator of an element in `HomogeneousLocalization x`. -/
def num (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : A :=
(Quotient.out f).num
/-- Denominator of an element in `HomogeneousLocalization x`. -/
def den (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : A :=
(Quotient.out f).den
/-- For an element in `HomogeneousLocalization x`, degree is the natural number `i` such that
`𝒜 i` contains both numerator and denominator. -/
def deg (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : ι :=
(Quotient.out f).deg
theorem den_mem (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f.den ∈ x :=
(Quotient.out f).den_mem
theorem num_mem_deg (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f.num ∈ 𝒜 f.deg :=
(Quotient.out f).num.2
theorem den_mem_deg (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f.den ∈ 𝒜 f.deg :=
(Quotient.out f).den.2
theorem eq_num_div_den (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :
f.val = Localization.mk f.num ⟨f.den, f.den_mem⟩ :=
congr_arg HomogeneousLocalization.val (Quotient.out_eq' f).symm
theorem den_smul_val (f : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) :
f.den • f.val = algebraMap _ _ f.num := by
rw [eq_num_div_den, Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.smul_mk']
exact IsLocalization.mk'_mul_cancel_left _ ⟨_, _⟩
theorem ext_iff_val (f g : HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x) : f = g ↔ f.val = g.val :=
⟨congr_arg val, fun e ↦ val_injective x e⟩
section
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι] [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
variable (𝒜) (𝔭 : Ideal A) [Ideal.IsPrime 𝔭]
/-- Localizing a ring homogeneously at a prime ideal. -/
abbrev AtPrime :=
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 𝔭.primeCompl
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_val (f : HomogeneousLocalization.AtPrime 𝒜 𝔭) :
IsUnit f.val ↔ IsUnit f := by
refine ⟨fun h1 ↦ ?_, IsUnit.map (algebraMap _ _)⟩
rcases h1 with ⟨⟨a, b, eq0, eq1⟩, rfl : a = f.val⟩
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := mk_surjective f
obtain ⟨b, s, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective 𝔭.primeCompl b
rw [val_mk, Localization.mk_eq_mk', ← IsLocalization.mk'_mul, IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul,
one_mul, IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists (M := 𝔭.primeCompl)] at eq0
obtain ⟨c, hc : _ = c.1 * (f.den.1 * s.1)⟩ := eq0
have : f.num.1 ∉ 𝔭 := by
exact fun h ↦ mul_mem c.2 (mul_mem f.den_mem s.2)
(hc ▸ Ideal.mul_mem_left _ c.1 (Ideal.mul_mem_right b _ h))
refine isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (Quotient.mk'' ⟨f.1, f.3, f.2, this⟩) ?_
rw [← mk_mul, ext_iff_val, val_mk]
simp [mul_comm f.den.1, Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk']
instance : Nontrivial (HomogeneousLocalization.AtPrime 𝒜 𝔭) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun r => by simp [ext_iff_val, val_zero, val_one, zero_ne_one] at r⟩⟩
instance isLocalRing : IsLocalRing (HomogeneousLocalization.AtPrime 𝒜 𝔭) :=
IsLocalRing.of_isUnit_or_isUnit_one_sub_self fun a => by
simpa only [← isUnit_iff_isUnit_val, val_sub, val_one]
using IsLocalRing.isUnit_or_isUnit_one_sub_self _
end
section
variable (𝒜) (f : A)
|
/-- Localizing away from powers of `f` homogeneously. -/
abbrev Away :=
HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 (Submonoid.powers f)
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [DecidableEq ι] [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
variable {𝒜} {f}
theorem Away.eventually_smul_mem {m} (hf : f ∈ 𝒜 m) (z : Away 𝒜 f) :
∀ᶠ n in Filter.atTop, f ^ n • z.val ∈ algebraMap _ _ '' (𝒜 (n • m) : Set A) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk : f ^ k = _⟩ := z.den_mem
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (Filter.Ici_mem_atTop k)
rintro k' (hk' : k ≤ k')
simp only [Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
by_cases hfk : f ^ k = 0
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousLocalization.lean | 561 | 575 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Composition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.HasLocalization
/-! The category of homological complexes up to quasi-isomorphisms
Given a category `C` with homology and any complex shape `c`, we define
the category `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` which is the localized
category of `HomologicalComplex C c` with respect to quasi-isomorphisms.
When `C` is abelian, this will be the derived category of `C` in the
particular case of the complex shape `ComplexShape.up ℤ`.
Under suitable assumptions on `c` (e.g. chain complexes, or cochain
complexes indexed by `ℤ`), we shall show that `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c`
is also the localized category of `HomotopyCategory C c` with respect to
the class of quasi-isomorphisms.
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits
section
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) [HasZeroMorphisms C]
[CategoryWithHomology C]
lemma HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso (i : ι) :
(quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy (homologyFunctor C c i) := fun _ _ _ hf => by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf
dsimp
infer_instance
variable [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization]
/-- The category of homological complexes up to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
abbrev HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso := (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).Localization'
variable {C c} in
/-- The localization functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c`. -/
abbrev HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c :=
(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).Q'
namespace HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
/-- The homology functor `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c ⥤ C` for each `i : ι`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctor (i : ι) : HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c ⥤ C :=
Localization.lift _ (HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso C c i) Q
/-- The homology functor on `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` is induced by
the homology functor on `HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorFactors (i : ι) :
Q ⋙ homologyFunctor C c i ≅ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor C c i :=
Localization.fac _ (HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso C c i) Q
variable {C c}
lemma isIso_Q_map_iff_mem_quasiIso {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} (f : K ⟶ L) :
IsIso (Q.map f) ↔ HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c f := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff, quasiIso_iff]
intro i
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap]
refine (NatIso.isIso_map_iff (homologyFunctorFactors C c i) f).1 ?_
dsimp
infer_instance
· intro h
exact Localization.inverts Q (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) _ h
end HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
end
section
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) [Preadditive C]
[CategoryWithHomology C]
lemma HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q_inverts_homotopyEquivalences
[(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization] :
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c).IsInvertedBy
HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q :=
MorphismProperty.IsInvertedBy.of_le _ _ _
(Localization.inverts Q (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c))
(homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso C c)
namespace HomotopyCategory
/-- The class of quasi-isomorphisms in the homotopy category. -/
def quasiIso : MorphismProperty (HomotopyCategory C c) :=
fun _ _ f => ∀ (i : ι), IsIso ((homologyFunctor C c i).map f)
variable {C c}
lemma mem_quasiIso_iff {X Y : HomotopyCategory C c} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
quasiIso C c f ↔ ∀ (n : ι), IsIso ((homologyFunctor _ _ n).map f) := by
rfl
lemma quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} (f : K ⟶ L) :
quasiIso C c ((quotient C c).map f) ↔ HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c f := by
have eq := fun (i : ι) => NatIso.isIso_map_iff (homologyFunctorFactors C c i) f
dsimp at eq
simp only [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff, mem_quasiIso_iff, quasiIso_iff,
quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap, eq]
variable (C c)
instance respectsIso_quasiIso : (quasiIso C c).RespectsIso := by
apply MorphismProperty.RespectsIso.of_respects_arrow_iso
intro f g e hf i
exact ((MorphismProperty.isomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
((homologyFunctor C c i).mapArrow.mapIso e)).1 (hf i)
lemma homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso (i : ι) :
(quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy (homologyFunctor C c i) := fun _ _ _ hf => hf i
lemma quasiIso_eq_quasiIso_map_quotient :
quasiIso C c = (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).map (quotient C c) := by
ext ⟨K⟩ ⟨L⟩ f
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).map_surjective f
constructor
· intro hf
rw [quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf
exact MorphismProperty.map_mem_map _ _ _ hf
· rintro ⟨K', L', g, h, ⟨e⟩⟩
rw [← quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff] at h
exact ((quasiIso C c).arrow_mk_iso_iff e).1 h
end HomotopyCategory
/-- The condition on a complex shape `c` saying that homotopic maps become equal in
the localized category with respect to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
class ComplexShape.QFactorsThroughHomotopy {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
(C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C]
[CategoryWithHomology C] : Prop where
areEqualizedByLocalization {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} {f g : K ⟶ L} (h : Homotopy f g) :
AreEqualizedByLocalization (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) f g
namespace HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
variable {C c}
variable [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization] [c.QFactorsThroughHomotopy C]
lemma Q_map_eq_of_homotopy {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} {f g : K ⟶ L} (h : Homotopy f g) :
Q.map f = Q.map g :=
(ComplexShape.QFactorsThroughHomotopy.areEqualizedByLocalization h).map_eq Q
/-- The functor `HomotopyCategory C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` from the homotopy
category to the localized category with respect to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
def Qh : HomotopyCategory C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c :=
CategoryTheory.Quotient.lift _ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q (by
intro K L f g ⟨h⟩
exact Q_map_eq_of_homotopy h)
variable (C c)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `HomotopyCategory.quotient C c ⋙ Qh ≅ Q`. -/
def quotientCompQhIso : HomotopyCategory.quotient C c ⋙ Qh ≅ Q := by
apply Quotient.lift.isLift
lemma Qh_inverts_quasiIso : (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy Qh := by
rintro ⟨K⟩ ⟨L⟩ φ
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).map_surjective φ
rw [HomotopyCategory.quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff φ,
← HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.isIso_Q_map_iff_mem_quasiIso]
exact (NatIso.isIso_map_iff (quotientCompQhIso C c) φ).2
instance : (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c ⋙ Qh).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) :=
Functor.IsLocalization.of_iso _ (quotientCompQhIso C c).symm
/-- The homology functor on `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` is induced by
the homology functor on `HomotopyCategory C c`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorFactorsh (i : ι) :
Qh ⋙ homologyFunctor C c i ≅ HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor C c i :=
Quotient.natIsoLift _ ((Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (quotientCompQhIso C c) _ ≪≫
homologyFunctorFactors C c i ≪≫ (HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors C c i).symm)
section
variable [(HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c)]
/-- The category `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` which was defined as a localization of
`HomologicalComplex C c` with respect to quasi-isomorphisms also identify to a localization
of the homotopy category with respect ot quasi-isomorphisms. -/
instance : HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Qh.IsLocalization (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C c) :=
Functor.IsLocalization.of_comp (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c)
Qh (HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c)
(HomotopyCategory.quasiIso C c) (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c)
(homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso C c)
(HomotopyCategory.quasiIso_eq_quasiIso_map_quotient C c)
end
end HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
end
section Cylinder
variable {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) (hc : ∀ j, ∃ i, c.Rel i j)
(C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
include hc
/-- The homotopy category satisfies the universal property of the localized category
with respect to homotopy equivalences. -/
def ComplexShape.strictUniversalPropertyFixedTargetQuotient (E : Type*) [Category E] :
Localization.StrictUniversalPropertyFixedTarget (HomotopyCategory.quotient C c)
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c) E where
inverts := HomotopyCategory.quotient_inverts_homotopyEquivalences C c
lift F hF := CategoryTheory.Quotient.lift _ F (by
intro K L f g ⟨h⟩
have : DecidableRel c.Rel := by classical infer_instance
exact h.map_eq_of_inverts_homotopyEquivalences hc F hF)
fac _ _ := rfl
uniq _ _ h := Quotient.lift_unique' _ _ _ h
|
lemma ComplexShape.quotient_isLocalization :
(HomotopyCategory.quotient C c).IsLocalization
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences _ _) := by
apply Functor.IsLocalization.mk'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Localization.lean | 228 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
/-!
# Homological complexes supported in a single degree
We define `single V j c : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c`,
which constructs complexes in `V` of shape `c`, supported in degree `j`.
In `ChainComplex.toSingle₀Equiv` we characterize chain maps to an
`ℕ`-indexed complex concentrated in degree 0; they are equivalent to
`{ f : C.X 0 ⟶ X // C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0 }`.
(This is useful translating between a projective resolution and
an augmented exact complex of projectives.)
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits ZeroObject
universe v u
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] [HasZeroObject V]
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c` creating a chain complex supported in a single degree.
-/
noncomputable def single (j : ι) : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c where
obj A :=
{ X := fun i => if i = j then A else 0
d := fun _ _ => 0 }
map f :=
{ f := fun i => if h : i = j then eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) ≫ f ≫
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) else 0 }
map_id A := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· #adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-07
the previous sensible proof `rw [if_neg h]; simp` fails with "motive not type correct".
The following is horrible. -/
convert (id_zero (C := V)).symm
all_goals simp [if_neg h]
map_comp f g := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
variable {V}
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_X_self (j : ι) (A : V) :
((single V c j).obj A).X j = A := if_pos rfl
lemma isZero_single_obj_X (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
IsZero (((single V c j).obj A).X i) := by
dsimp [single]
rw [if_neg hi]
exact Limits.isZero_zero V
/-- The object in degree `i` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A` when `i = j`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXIsoOfEq (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i = j) :
((single V c j).obj A).X i ≅ A :=
eqToIso (by subst hi; simp [single])
/-- The object in degree `j` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXSelf (j : ι) (A : V) : ((single V c j).obj A).X j ≅ A :=
singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A j rfl
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_d (j : ι) (A : V) (k l : ι) :
((single V c j).obj A).d k l = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem single_map_f_self (j : ι) {A B : V} (f : A ⟶ B) :
((single V c j).map f).f j = (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom ≫
f ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv := by
dsimp [single]
rw [dif_pos rfl]
rfl
variable (V)
/-- The natural isomorphism `single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def singleCompEvalIsoSelf (j : ι) : single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V :=
NatIso.ofComponents (singleObjXSelf c j) (fun {A B} f => by simp [single_map_f_self])
lemma isZero_single_comp_eval (j i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) : IsZero (single V c j ⋙ eval V c i) :=
Functor.isZero _ (fun _ ↦ isZero_single_obj_X c _ _ _ hi)
variable {V c}
@[ext]
lemma from_single_hom_ext {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V}
{f g : (single V c j).obj A ⟶ K} (hfg : f.f j = g.f j) : f = g := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
exact hfg
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i h).eq_of_src
@[ext]
lemma to_single_hom_ext {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V}
{f g : K ⟶ (single V c j).obj A} (hfg : f.f j = g.f j) : f = g := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
| exact hfg
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i h).eq_of_tgt
instance (j : ι) : (single V c j).Faithful where
map_injective {A B f g} w := by
rw [← cancel_mono (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv,
← cancel_epi (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom, ← single_map_f_self,
← single_map_f_self, w]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Single.lean | 120 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Measurable parametric Stieltjes functions
We provide tools to build a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at
+∞ for all `a : α` from a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ`. These measurable parametric Stieltjes
functions are cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of transition kernels.
The reason for going through `ℚ` instead of defining directly a Stieltjes function is that since
`ℚ` is countable, building a measurable function is easier and we can obtain properties of the
form `∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ∀ (q : ℚ), ...` (for some measure `μ` on `α`) by proving the weaker
`∀ (q : ℚ), ∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ...`.
This construction will be possible if `f a : ℚ → ℝ` satisfies a package of properties for all `a`:
monotonicity, limits at +-∞ and a continuity property. We define `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` to state
that this is the case at `a` and define the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF f` that `f` is measurable
and `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` for all `a`.
The function `α → StieltjesFunction` obtained by extending `f` by continuity from the right is then
called `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
In applications, we will often only have `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost surely with respect to
some measure. In order to turn that almost everywhere property into an everywhere property we define
`toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) := fun a q ↦ if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a q else defaultRatCDF q`,
which satisfies the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF (toRatCDF f)`.
Finally, we define `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`, composition of `toRatCDF` and
`IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
## Main definitions
* `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`: turn a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into a measurable
function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
/-- A measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ gives a measurable
function `α → Measure ℝ` by taking `StieltjesFunction.measure` at each point. -/
lemma StieltjesFunction.measurable_measure {α : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{f : α → StieltjesFunction} (hf : ∀ q, Measurable fun a ↦ f a q)
(hf_bot : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0))
(hf_top : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)) :
Measurable fun a ↦ (f a).measure :=
have : ∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (f a).measure :=
fun a ↦ (f a).isProbabilityMeasure (hf_bot a) (hf_top a)
.measure_of_isPiSystem_of_isProbabilityMeasure (borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic ℝ) isPiSystem_Iic <| by
simp_rw [forall_mem_range, StieltjesFunction.measure_Iic (f _) (hf_bot _), sub_zero]
exact fun _ ↦ (hf _).ennreal_ofReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α : Type*}
section IsMeasurableRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
/-- `a : α` is a Stieltjes point for `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` if `f a` is monotone with limit 0 at -∞
and 1 at +∞ and satisfies a continuity property. -/
structure IsRatStieltjesPoint (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) : Prop where
mono : Monotone (f a)
tendsto_atTop_one : Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)
tendsto_atBot_zero : Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)
iInf_rat_gt_eq : ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_unit_prod_iff (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun p : Unit × α ↦ f p.2) ((), a)
↔ IsRatStieltjesPoint f a := by
constructor <;>
exact fun h ↦ ⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one, h.tendsto_atBot_zero, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
lemma measurableSet_isRatStieltjesPoint [MeasurableSpace α] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a} := by
have h1 : MeasurableSet {a | Monotone (f a)} := by
change MeasurableSet {a | ∀ q r (_ : q ≤ r), f a q ≤ f a r}
simp_rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun r ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_le hf.eval hf.eval
have h2 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h3 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h4 : MeasurableSet {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t} := by
rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_eq_fun (.iInf fun _ ↦ hf.eval) hf.eval
suffices {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a}
= ({a | Monotone (f a)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)}
∩ {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t}) by
rw [this]
exact (((h1.inter h2).inter h3).inter h4)
ext a
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· exact ⟨⟨⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one⟩, h.tendsto_atBot_zero⟩, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
· exact ⟨h.1.1.1, h.1.1.2, h.1.2, h.2⟩
lemma IsRatStieltjesPoint.ite {f g : α → ℚ → ℝ} {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(hf : p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (hg : ¬ p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint g a) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun a ↦ if p a then f a else g a) a where
mono := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).mono, (hg h).mono]
tendsto_atTop_one := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atTop_one, (hg h).tendsto_atTop_one]
tendsto_atBot_zero := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atBot_zero, (hg h).tendsto_atBot_zero]
iInf_rat_gt_eq := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).iInf_rat_gt_eq, (hg h).iInf_rat_gt_eq]
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- A function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` is a (kernel) rational cumulative distribution function if it is
measurable in the first argument and if `f a` satisfies a list of properties for all `a : α`:
monotonicity between 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ and a form of continuity.
A function with these properties can be extended to a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
-/
structure IsMeasurableRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : Prop where
isRatStieltjesPoint : ∀ a, IsRatStieltjesPoint f a
measurable : Measurable f
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.nonneg {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
0 ≤ f a q :=
Monotone.le_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.le_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
f a q ≤ 1 :=
Monotone.ge_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atTop_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atBot_zero {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.iInf_rat_gt_eq {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α)
(q : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi q, f a r = f a q := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).iInf_rat_gt_eq q
end IsMeasurableRatCDF
section DefaultRatCDF
/-- A function with the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF`.
Used in a piecewise construction to convert a function which only satisfies the properties
defining `IsMeasurableRatCDF` on some set into a true `IsMeasurableRatCDF`. -/
def defaultRatCDF (q : ℚ) := if q < 0 then (0 : ℝ) else 1
lemma monotone_defaultRatCDF : Monotone defaultRatCDF := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
intro x y hxy
dsimp only
| split_ifs with h_1 h_2 h_2
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one, absurd (hxy.trans_lt h_2) h_1, le_rfl]
lemma defaultRatCDF_nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ defaultRatCDF q := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/MeasurableStieltjes.lean | 167 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 520 | 532 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Partial sums of geometric series
This file determines the values of the geometric series $\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i$ and
$\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i y^{n-1-i}$ and variants thereof. We also provide some bounds on the
"geometric" sum of `a/b^i` where `a b : ℕ`.
## Main statements
* `geom_sum_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^i=\frac{x^n-x^m}{x-1}$ in a division ring.
* `geom_sum₂_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^iy^{n - 1 - i}=\frac{x^n-y^{n-m}x^m}{x-y}$
in a field.
Several variants are recorded, generalising in particular to the case of a noncommutative ring in
which `x` and `y` commute. Even versions not using division or subtraction, valid in each semiring,
are recorded.
-/
variable {R K : Type*}
open Finset MulOpposite
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem geom_sum_succ {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = (x * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) + 1 := by
simp only [mul_sum, ← pow_succ', sum_range_succ', pow_zero]
theorem geom_sum_succ' {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = x ^ n + ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
(sum_range_succ _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
theorem geom_sum_zero (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 0, x ^ i = 0 :=
rfl
theorem geom_sum_one (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 1, x ^ i = 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem geom_sum_two {x : R} : ∑ i ∈ range 2, x ^ i = x + 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem zero_geom_sum : ∀ {n}, ∑ i ∈ range n, (0 : R) ^ i = if n = 0 then 0 else 1
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [geom_sum_succ']
simp [zero_geom_sum]
theorem one_geom_sum (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, (1 : R) ^ i = n := by simp
theorem op_geom_sum (x : R) (n : ℕ) : op (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, op x ^ i := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem op_geom_sum₂ (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ (n - 1 - i) * op x ^ i =
∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ i * op x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le] at j_in
congr
apply tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_right j_in
theorem geom_sum₂_with_one (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * 1 ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_congr rfl fun i _ => by rw [one_pow, mul_one]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n := by
let f : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun m i : ℕ => (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (m - 1 - i)
change (∑ i ∈ range n, (f n) i) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n
induction n with
| zero => rw [range_zero, sum_empty, zero_mul, zero_add, pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
have f_last : f (n + 1) n = (x + y) ^ n := by
dsimp only [f]
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, Nat.add_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one]
have f_succ : ∀ i, i ∈ range n → f (n + 1) i = y * f n i := fun i hi => by
dsimp only [f]
have : Commute y ((x + y) ^ i) := (h.symm.add_right (Commute.refl y)).pow_right i
rw [← mul_assoc, this.eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ' y (n - 1 - i), add_tsub_cancel_right,
← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm 1 i]
have : i + 1 + (n - (i + 1)) = n := add_tsub_cancel_of_le (mem_range.mp hi)
rw [add_comm (i + 1)] at this
rw [← this, add_tsub_cancel_right, add_comm i 1, ← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [pow_succ' (x + y), add_mul, sum_range_succ_comm, add_mul, f_last, add_assoc,
(((Commute.refl x).add_right h).pow_right n).eq, sum_congr rfl f_succ, ← mul_sum,
pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, ← mul_add y, ih]
end Semiring
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_geom_sum [Ring R] {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range n, (-1 : R) ^ i = if Even n then 0 else 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ k hk =>
simp only [geom_sum_succ', Nat.even_add_one, hk]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.neg_one_pow, add_zero]
· rw [(Nat.not_even_iff_odd.1 h).neg_one_pow, neg_add_cancel]
theorem geom_sum₂_self {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) = n * x ^ (n - 1) :=
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (i + (n - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [← pow_add]
_ = ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (n - 1) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ hi =>
congr_arg _ <| add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi
_ = #(range n) • x ^ (n - 1) := sum_const _
_ = n * x ^ (n - 1) := by rw [Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_add [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
theorem geom_sum_mul_add [Semiring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + 1) ^ i) * x + 1 = (x + 1) ^ n := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
have := (h.sub_left (Commute.refl y)).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [sub_add_cancel] at this
rw [← this, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Commute.mul_neg_geom_sum₂ [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((y - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_mul, op_sub, op_geom_sum₂, op_pow]
simp [(Commute.op h.symm).geom_sum₂_mul n]
theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂ [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rw [← neg_sub (y ^ n), ← h.mul_neg_geom_sum₂, ← neg_mul, neg_sub]
theorem geom_sum₂_mul [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul n
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R] [AddLeftMono R]
[ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x y : R} (hxy : y ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
apply eq_tsub_of_add_eq
simpa only [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hxy] using geom_sum₂_mul_add (x - y) y n
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_of_le [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R] [AddLeftMono R]
[ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x y : R} (hxy : x ≤ y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (y - x) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
rw [← Finset.sum_range_reflect]
convert geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge hxy n using 3
simp_all only [Finset.mem_range]
rw [mul_comm]
congr
omega
theorem Commute.sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
Dvd.intro _ <| h.mul_geom_sum₂ _
theorem sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x y n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rcases le_or_lt y x with h | h
· have : y ^ n ≤ x ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h _
exact mod_cast sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) n
· have : x ^ n ≤ y ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h.le _
exact (Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le this).symm ▸ dvd_zero (x - y)
theorem one_sub_dvd_one_sub_pow [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
1 - x ∣ 1 - x ^ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_left x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
x - 1 ∣ x ^ n - 1 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_right x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
lemma pow_one_sub_dvd_pow_mul_sub_one [Ring R] (x : R) (m n : ℕ) :
((x ^ m) - 1 : R) ∣ (x ^ (m * n) - 1) := by
rw [npow_mul]
exact sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one (x := x ^ m) (n := n)
lemma nat_pow_one_sub_dvd_pow_mul_sub_one (x m n : ℕ) : x ^ m - 1 ∣ x ^ (m * n) - 1 := by
nth_rw 2 [← Nat.one_pow n]
rw [Nat.pow_mul x m n]
apply nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x ^ m) 1
theorem Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) :
x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n := by
have h₁ := geom_sum₂_mul x (-y) n
rw [Odd.neg_pow h y, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_neg_eq_add] at h₁
exact Dvd.intro_left _ h₁
theorem Odd.nat_add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x y : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) : x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n :=
mod_cast Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) h
theorem geom_sum_mul [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
theorem geom_sum_mul_of_one_le [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R]
[AddLeftMono R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x : R} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
simpa using geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge hx n
theorem geom_sum_mul_of_le_one [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R]
[AddLeftMono R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x : R} (hx : x ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
simpa using geom_sum₂_mul_of_le hx n
theorem mul_geom_sum [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : ((x - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = x ^ n - 1 :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul (op x) n
theorem geom_sum_mul_neg [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
have := congr_arg Neg.neg (geom_sum_mul x n)
rw [neg_sub, ← mul_neg, neg_sub] at this
exact this
theorem mul_neg_geom_sum [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : ((1 - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = 1 - x ^ n :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul_neg (op x) n
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_comm [Semiring R] {x y : R} (n : ℕ)
(h : Commute x y) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
cases n; · simp
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
rw [← Finset.sum_flip]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
simpa [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hi))] using h.pow_pow _ _
theorem geom_sum₂_comm [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_comm n
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂ [DivisionRing K] {x y : K} (h' : Commute x y) (h : x ≠ y)
(n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h'.geom_sum₂_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
theorem geom₂_sum [Field K] {x y : K} (h : x ≠ y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂ h n
theorem geom₂_sum_of_gt [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
{x y : K} (h : y < x) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge h.le n)
theorem geom₂_sum_of_lt [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
{x y : K} (h : x < y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (y ^ n - x ^ n) / (y - x) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum₂_mul_of_le h.le n)
theorem geom_sum_eq [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (h : x ≠ 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) := by
have : x - 1 ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← geom_sum_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
lemma geom_sum_of_one_lt {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h : 1 < x) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum_mul_of_one_le h.le n)
lemma geom_sum_of_lt_one {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h : x < 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i = (1 - x ^ n) / (1 - x) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum_mul_of_le_one h.le n)
theorem geom_sum_lt {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h0 : x ≠ 0) (h1 : x < 1) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i < (1 - x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at h0
rw [geom_sum_of_lt_one h1, div_lt_iff₀, inv_mul_cancel₀, tsub_lt_self_iff]
· exact ⟨h0.trans h1, pow_pos h0 n⟩
· rwa [ne_eq, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, not_le]
· rwa [tsub_pos_iff_lt]
protected theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn]
have :
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * y ^ (n - 1 - k) =
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * (y ^ (n - m) * y ^ (m - 1 - k)) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [← pow_add]
congr
rw [mem_range] at j_in
omega
rw [this]
simp_rw [pow_mul_comm y (n - m) _]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
rw [← sum_mul, mul_sub, h.mul_geom_sum₂, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_geom_sum₂, sub_mul, ← pow_add,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right (x ^ n) (x ^ m * y ^ (n - m)) (y ^ n)]
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_succ_eq [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_range_succ_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one, add_right_inj, ← mul_assoc,
(h.symm.pow_right _).eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ']
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
suffices n - 1 - i + 1 = n - i by rw [this]
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
omega
theorem geom_sum₂_succ_eq [CommRing R] (x y : R) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_succ_eq
theorem mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [CommRing R] (x y : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) :=
| (Commute.all x y).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
| Mathlib/Algebra/GeomSum.lean | 343 | 345 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Diam
/-!
## Boundedness in (pseudo)-metric spaces
This file contains one definition, and various results on boundedness in pseudo-metric spaces.
* `Metric.diam s` : The `iSup` of the distances of members of `s`.
Defined in terms of `EMetric.diam`, for better handling of the case when it should be infinite.
* `isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall`: a non-empty set is bounded if and only if
it is included in some closed ball
* describing the cobounded filter, relating to the cocompact filter
* `IsCompact.isBounded`: compact sets are bounded
* `TotallyBounded.isBounded`: totally bounded sets are bounded
* `isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded`, the **Heine–Borel theorem**:
in a proper space, a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded.
* `cobounded_eq_cocompact`: in a proper space, cobounded and compact sets are the same
diameter of a subset, and its relation to boundedness
## Tags
metric, pseudo_metric, bounded, diameter, Heine-Borel theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Uniformity Topology Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
namespace Metric
section Bounded
variable {x : α} {s t : Set α} {r : ℝ}
/-- Closed balls are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_closedBall : IsBounded (closedBall x r) :=
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨r + r, fun y hy z hz =>
calc dist y z ≤ dist y x + dist z x := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ r + r := add_le_add hy hz⟩
/-- Open balls are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_ball : IsBounded (ball x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset ball_subset_closedBall
/-- Spheres are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_sphere : IsBounded (sphere x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset sphere_subset_closedBall
/-- Given a point, a bounded subset is included in some ball around this point -/
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
⟨fun h ↦ (isBounded_iff.1 (h.insert c)).imp fun _r hr _x hx ↦ hr (.inr hx) (mem_insert _ _),
fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_closedBall.subset hr⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) :
∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
(isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).1 h
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ ball c r :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := h.subset_closedBall c
⟨max r a + 1, (le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _), hr.trans <| closedBall_subset_ball <|
(le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) : ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
(h.subset_ball_lt 0 c).imp fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_ball (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
⟨(IsBounded.subset_ball · c), fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_ball.subset hr⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
let ⟨r, har, hr⟩ := h.subset_ball_lt a c
⟨r, har, hr.trans ball_subset_closedBall⟩
theorem isBounded_closure_of_isBounded (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
let ⟨C, h⟩ := isBounded_iff.1 h
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨C, fun _a ha _b hb => isClosed_Iic.closure_subset <|
map_mem_closure₂ continuous_dist ha hb h⟩
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.closure (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
isBounded_closure_of_isBounded h
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_closure_iff : IsBounded (closure s) ↔ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => h.subset subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_closedBall (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (closedBall c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).trans <| by simp⟩
theorem hasAntitoneBasis_cobounded_compl_closedBall (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasAntitoneBasis (fun r ↦ (closedBall c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨Metric.hasBasis_cobounded_compl_closedBall _, fun _ _ hr _ ↦ by simpa using hr.trans_lt⟩
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (ball c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_ball c).trans <| by simp⟩
theorem hasAntitoneBasis_cobounded_compl_ball (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasAntitoneBasis (fun r ↦ (ball c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨Metric.hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball _, fun _ _ hr _ ↦ by simpa using hr.trans⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_right_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist · c) atTop = cobounded α :=
(atTop_basis.comap _).eq_of_same_basis <| by
simpa only [compl_def, mem_ball, not_lt] using hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball c
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_left_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist c) atTop = cobounded α := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ c] using comap_dist_right_atTop c
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_dist_right_atTop_iff (c : α) {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ dist (f x) c) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded α) := by
rw [← comap_dist_right_atTop c, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_dist_left_atTop_iff (c : α) {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ dist c (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded α) := by
simp only [dist_comm c, tendsto_dist_right_atTop_iff]
theorem tendsto_dist_right_cobounded_atTop (c : α) : Tendsto (dist · c) (cobounded α) atTop :=
tendsto_iff_comap.2 (comap_dist_right_atTop c).ge
theorem tendsto_dist_left_cobounded_atTop (c : α) : Tendsto (dist c) (cobounded α) atTop :=
tendsto_iff_comap.2 (comap_dist_left_atTop c).ge
/-- A totally bounded set is bounded -/
theorem _root_.TotallyBounded.isBounded {s : Set α} (h : TotallyBounded s) : IsBounded s :=
-- We cover the totally bounded set by finitely many balls of radius 1,
-- and then argue that a finite union of bounded sets is bounded
let ⟨_t, fint, subs⟩ := (totallyBounded_iff.mp h) 1 zero_lt_one
((isBounded_biUnion fint).2 fun _ _ => isBounded_ball).subset subs
/-- A compact set is bounded -/
theorem _root_.IsCompact.isBounded {s : Set α} (h : IsCompact s) : IsBounded s :=
-- A compact set is totally bounded, thus bounded
h.totallyBounded.isBounded
theorem cobounded_le_cocompact : cobounded α ≤ cocompact α :=
hasBasis_cocompact.ge_iff.2 fun _s hs ↦ hs.isBounded
theorem isCobounded_iff_closedBall_compl_subset {s : Set α} (c : α) :
IsCobounded s ↔ ∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [← isBounded_compl_iff, isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c]
apply exists_congr
intro r
rw [compl_subset_comm]
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsCobounded.closedBall_compl_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsCobounded s)
(c : α) : ∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
(isCobounded_iff_closedBall_compl_subset c).mp hs
theorem closedBall_compl_subset_of_mem_cocompact {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ cocompact α) (c : α) :
∃ (r : ℝ), (Metric.closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
IsCobounded.closedBall_compl_subset (cobounded_le_cocompact hs) c
theorem mem_cocompact_of_closedBall_compl_subset [ProperSpace α] (c : α)
(h : ∃ r, (closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s) : s ∈ cocompact α := by
rcases h with ⟨r, h⟩
rw [Filter.mem_cocompact]
exact ⟨closedBall c r, isCompact_closedBall c r, h⟩
theorem mem_cocompact_iff_closedBall_compl_subset [ProperSpace α] (c : α) :
s ∈ cocompact α ↔ ∃ r, (closedBall c r)ᶜ ⊆ s :=
⟨(closedBall_compl_subset_of_mem_cocompact · _), mem_cocompact_of_closedBall_compl_subset _⟩
/-- Characterization of the boundedness of the range of a function -/
theorem isBounded_range_iff {f : β → α} : IsBounded (range f) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| by simp only [forall_mem_range]
theorem isBounded_image_iff {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
IsBounded (f '' s) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| by simp only [forall_mem_image]
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity {f : β → α}
(hf : Tendsto (Prod.map f f) (.cofinite ×ˢ .cofinite) (𝓤 α)) : IsBounded (range f) := by
rcases (hasBasis_cofinite.prod_self.tendsto_iff uniformity_basis_dist).1 hf 1 zero_lt_one with
⟨s, hsf, hs1⟩
rw [← image_union_image_compl_eq_range]
refine (hsf.image f).isBounded.union (isBounded_image_iff.2 ⟨1, fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_⟩)
exact le_of_lt (hs1 (x, y) ⟨hx, hy⟩)
theorem isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite {f : β → α} (hf : Cauchy (map f cofinite)) :
IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity <| (cauchy_map_iff.1 hf).2
theorem _root_.CauchySeq.isBounded_range {f : ℕ → α} (hf : CauchySeq f) : IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_cauchy_map_cofinite <| by rwa [Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 a)) :
IsBounded (range f) :=
isBounded_range_of_tendsto_cofinite_uniformity <|
(hf.prodMap hf).mono_right <| nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)
/-- In a compact space, all sets are bounded -/
theorem isBounded_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace α] : IsBounded s :=
isCompact_univ.isBounded.subset (subset_univ _)
theorem isBounded_range_of_tendsto (u : ℕ → α) {x : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
IsBounded (range u) :=
hu.cauchySeq.isBounded_range
theorem disjoint_nhds_cobounded (x : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (cobounded α) :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_right (ball_mem_nhds _ one_pos) isBounded_ball
theorem disjoint_cobounded_nhds (x : α) : Disjoint (cobounded α) (𝓝 x) :=
(disjoint_nhds_cobounded x).symm
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_cobounded {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (cobounded α) :=
hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left.2 fun _ _ ↦ disjoint_nhds_cobounded _
theorem disjoint_cobounded_nhdsSet {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) : Disjoint (cobounded α) (𝓝ˢ s) :=
(disjoint_nhdsSet_cobounded hs).symm
theorem exists_isBounded_image_of_tendsto {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β]
{l : Filter α} {f : α → β} {x : β} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) :
∃ s ∈ l, IsBounded (f '' s) :=
(l.basis_sets.map f).disjoint_iff_left.mp <| (disjoint_nhds_cobounded x).mono_left hf
/-- If a function is continuous within a set `s` at every point of a compact set `k`, then it is
bounded on some open neighborhood of `k` in `s`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt
[TopologicalSpace β] {k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ k, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' (t ∩ s)) := by
have : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ k ⊓ 𝓟 s) (comap f (cobounded α)) := by
rw [disjoint_assoc, inf_comm, hk.disjoint_nhdsSet_left]
exact fun x hx ↦ disjoint_left_comm.2 <|
tendsto_comap.disjoint (disjoint_cobounded_nhds _) (hf x hx)
rcases ((((hasBasis_nhdsSet _).inf_principal _)).disjoint_iff ((basis_sets _).comap _)).1 this
with ⟨U, ⟨hUo, hkU⟩, t, ht, hd⟩
refine ⟨U, hkU, hUo, (isBounded_compl_iff.2 ht).subset ?_⟩
rwa [image_subset_iff, preimage_compl, subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
/-- If a function is continuous at every point of a compact set `k`, then it is bounded on
some open neighborhood of `k`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt [TopologicalSpace β]
{k : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hf : ∀ x ∈ k, ContinuousAt f x) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ] at hf
simpa only [inter_univ] using
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt hk hf
/-- If a function is continuous on a set `s` containing a compact set `k`, then it is bounded on
some open neighborhood of `k` in `s`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn [TopologicalSpace β]
{k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hks : k ⊆ s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_inter_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousWithinAt hk fun x hx =>
hf x (hks hx)
/-- If a function is continuous on a neighborhood of a compact set `k`, then it is bounded on
some open neighborhood of `k`. -/
theorem exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn [TopologicalSpace β]
{k s : Set β} {f : β → α} (hk : IsCompact k) (hs : IsOpen s) (hks : k ⊆ s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ t, k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (f '' t) :=
exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_forall_continuousAt hk fun _x hx =>
hf.continuousAt (hs.mem_nhds (hks hx))
/-- The **Heine–Borel theorem**: In a proper space, a closed bounded set is compact. -/
theorem isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded [ProperSpace α] (hc : IsClosed s) (hb : IsBounded s) :
IsCompact s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, -⟩)
· exact isCompact_empty
· rcases hb.subset_closedBall x with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact (isCompact_closedBall x r).of_isClosed_subset hc hr
/-- The **Heine–Borel theorem**: In a proper space, the closure of a bounded set is compact. -/
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.isCompact_closure [ProperSpace α] (h : IsBounded s) :
IsCompact (closure s) :=
isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_closure h.closure
-- TODO: assume `[MetricSpace α]` instead of `[PseudoMetricSpace α] [T2Space α]`
/-- The **Heine–Borel theorem**:
In a proper Hausdorff space, a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_isClosed_bounded [T2Space α] [ProperSpace α] :
IsCompact s ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.isClosed, h.isBounded⟩, fun h => isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded h.1 h.2⟩
theorem compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ [ProperSpace α] :
CompactSpace α ↔ IsBounded (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@isBounded_of_compactSpace α _ _, fun hb => ⟨isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_univ hb⟩⟩
section CompactIccSpace
variable [Preorder α] [CompactIccSpace α]
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Icc (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Icc a b) :=
isCompact_Icc.totallyBounded
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Ico (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Ico a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Icc a b).subset Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Ioc (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Ioc a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Icc a b).subset Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem _root_.totallyBounded_Ioo (a b : α) : TotallyBounded (Ioo a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Icc a b).subset Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem isBounded_Icc (a b : α) : IsBounded (Icc a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Icc a b).isBounded
theorem isBounded_Ico (a b : α) : IsBounded (Ico a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Ico a b).isBounded
theorem isBounded_Ioc (a b : α) : IsBounded (Ioc a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Ioc a b).isBounded
theorem isBounded_Ioo (a b : α) : IsBounded (Ioo a b) :=
(totallyBounded_Ioo a b).isBounded
/-- In a pseudo metric space with a conditionally complete linear order such that the order and the
metric structure give the same topology, any order-bounded set is metric-bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_of_bddAbove_of_bddBelow {s : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : BddBelow s) :
IsBounded s :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := h₁
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := h₂
(isBounded_Icc l u).subset (fun _x hx => mem_Icc.mpr ⟨hl hx, hu hx⟩)
end CompactIccSpace
end Bounded
section Diam
variable {s : Set α} {x y z : α}
/-- The diameter of a set in a metric space. To get controllable behavior even when the diameter
should be infinite, we express it in terms of the `EMetric.diam` -/
noncomputable def diam (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (EMetric.diam s)
/-- The diameter of a set is always nonnegative -/
theorem diam_nonneg : 0 ≤ diam s :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
theorem diam_subsingleton (hs : s.Subsingleton) : diam s = 0 := by
simp only [diam, EMetric.diam_subsingleton hs, ENNReal.toReal_zero]
/-- The empty set has zero diameter -/
@[simp]
theorem diam_empty : diam (∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_empty
/-- A singleton has zero diameter -/
@[simp]
theorem diam_singleton : diam ({x} : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_subsingleton subsingleton_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_one [One α] : diam (1 : Set α) = 0 :=
diam_singleton
-- Does not work as a simp-lemma, since {x, y} reduces to (insert y {x})
theorem diam_pair : diam ({x, y} : Set α) = dist x y := by
simp only [diam, EMetric.diam_pair, dist_edist]
-- Does not work as a simp-lemma, since {x, y, z} reduces to (insert z (insert y {x}))
theorem diam_triple :
Metric.diam ({x, y, z} : Set α) = max (max (dist x y) (dist x z)) (dist y z) := by
simp only [Metric.diam, EMetric.diam_triple, dist_edist]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_max, ENNReal.toReal_max] <;> apply_rules [ne_of_lt, edist_lt_top, max_lt]
/-- If the distance between any two points in a set is bounded by some constant `C`,
then `ENNReal.ofReal C` bounds the emetric diameter of this set. -/
theorem ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le {C : ℝ} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C) :
EMetric.diam s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
EMetric.diam_le fun x hx y hy => (edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (h x hx y hy)
/-- If the distance between any two points in a set is bounded by some non-negative constant,
this constant bounds the diameter. -/
theorem diam_le_of_forall_dist_le {C : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 ≤ C) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C) :
diam s ≤ C :=
ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal h₀ (ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le h)
/-- If the distance between any two points in a nonempty set is bounded by some constant,
this constant bounds the diameter. -/
theorem diam_le_of_forall_dist_le_of_nonempty (hs : s.Nonempty) {C : ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C) : diam s ≤ C :=
have h₀ : 0 ≤ C :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
le_trans dist_nonneg (h x hx x hx)
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le h₀ h
/-- The distance between two points in a set is controlled by the diameter of the set. -/
theorem dist_le_diam_of_mem' (h : EMetric.diam s ≠ ⊤) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
dist x y ≤ diam s := by
rw [diam, dist_edist]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono h <| EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy
/-- Characterize the boundedness of a set in terms of the finiteness of its emetric.diameter. -/
theorem isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top : IsBounded s ↔ EMetric.diam s ≠ ⊤ :=
isBounded_iff.trans <| Iff.intro
(fun ⟨_C, hC⟩ => ne_top_of_le_ne_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top <| ediam_le_of_forall_dist_le hC)
fun h => ⟨diam s, fun _x hx _y hy => dist_le_diam_of_mem' h hx hy⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Bornology.IsBounded.ediam_ne_top, _⟩ := isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top
theorem ediam_eq_top_iff_unbounded : EMetric.diam s = ⊤ ↔ ¬IsBounded s :=
isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top.not_left.symm
theorem ediam_univ_eq_top_iff_noncompact [ProperSpace α] :
EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) = ∞ ↔ NoncompactSpace α := by
rw [← not_compactSpace_iff, compactSpace_iff_isBounded_univ, isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top,
Classical.not_not]
@[simp]
theorem ediam_univ_of_noncompact [ProperSpace α] [NoncompactSpace α] :
EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) = ∞ :=
ediam_univ_eq_top_iff_noncompact.mpr ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem diam_univ_of_noncompact [ProperSpace α] [NoncompactSpace α] : diam (univ : Set α) = 0 := by
simp [diam]
/-- The distance between two points in a set is controlled by the diameter of the set. -/
theorem dist_le_diam_of_mem (h : IsBounded s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : dist x y ≤ diam s :=
dist_le_diam_of_mem' h.ediam_ne_top hx hy
theorem ediam_of_unbounded (h : ¬IsBounded s) : EMetric.diam s = ∞ := ediam_eq_top_iff_unbounded.2 h
/-- An unbounded set has zero diameter. If you would prefer to get the value ∞, use `EMetric.diam`.
This lemma makes it possible to avoid side conditions in some situations -/
theorem diam_eq_zero_of_unbounded (h : ¬IsBounded s) : diam s = 0 := by
rw [diam, ediam_of_unbounded h, ENNReal.toReal_top]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then the diameter of `s` is bounded by that of `t`, provided `t` is bounded. -/
theorem diam_mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : IsBounded t) : diam s ≤ diam t :=
ENNReal.toReal_mono ht.ediam_ne_top <| EMetric.diam_mono h
/-- The diameter of a union is controlled by the sum of the diameters, and the distance between
any two points in each of the sets. This lemma is true without any side condition, since it is
obviously true if `s ∪ t` is unbounded. -/
theorem diam_union {t : Set α} (xs : x ∈ s) (yt : y ∈ t) :
diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := by
simp only [diam, dist_edist]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_le_add' (EMetric.diam_union xs yt) ?_ ?_).trans
(add_le_add_right ENNReal.toReal_add_le _)
· simp only [ENNReal.add_eq_top, edist_ne_top, or_false]
exact fun h ↦ top_unique <| h ▸ EMetric.diam_mono subset_union_left
· exact fun h ↦ top_unique <| h ▸ EMetric.diam_mono subset_union_right
/-- If two sets intersect, the diameter of the union is bounded by the sum of the diameters. -/
theorem diam_union' {t : Set α} (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + diam t := by
rcases h with ⟨x, ⟨xs, xt⟩⟩
simpa using diam_union xs xt
theorem diam_le_of_subset_closedBall {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h : s ⊆ closedBall x r) :
diam s ≤ 2 * r :=
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr) fun a ha b hb =>
calc
dist a b ≤ dist a x + dist b x := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ r + r := add_le_add (h ha) (h hb)
_ = 2 * r := by simp [mul_two, mul_comm]
/-- The diameter of a closed ball of radius `r` is at most `2 r`. -/
theorem diam_closedBall {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : diam (closedBall x r) ≤ 2 * r :=
diam_le_of_subset_closedBall h Subset.rfl
/-- The diameter of a ball of radius `r` is at most `2 r`. -/
theorem diam_ball {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : diam (ball x r) ≤ 2 * r :=
diam_le_of_subset_closedBall h ball_subset_closedBall
/-- If a family of complete sets with diameter tending to `0` is such that each finite intersection
is nonempty, then the total intersection is also nonempty. -/
theorem _root_.IsComplete.nonempty_iInter_of_nonempty_biInter {s : ℕ → Set α}
(h0 : IsComplete (s 0)) (hs : ∀ n, IsClosed (s n)) (h's : ∀ n, IsBounded (s n))
(h : ∀ N, (⋂ n ≤ N, s n).Nonempty) (h' : Tendsto (fun n => diam (s n)) atTop (𝓝 0)) :
(⋂ n, s n).Nonempty := by
let u N := (h N).some
have I : ∀ n N, n ≤ N → u N ∈ s n := by
intro n N hn
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (h N).choose_spec
intro x hx
simp only [mem_iInter] at hx
exact hx n hn
have : CauchySeq u := by
apply cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0 _ _ h'
intro m n N hm hn
exact dist_le_diam_of_mem (h's N) (I _ _ hm) (I _ _ hn)
obtain ⟨x, -, xlim⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s 0, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => u n) atTop (𝓝 x) :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h0 (fun n => I 0 n (zero_le _)) this
refine ⟨x, mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_⟩
apply (hs n).mem_of_tendsto xlim
filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop n] with p hp
exact I n p hp
/-- In a complete space, if a family of closed sets with diameter tending to `0` is such that each
finite intersection is nonempty, then the total intersection is also nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_iInter_of_nonempty_biInter [CompleteSpace α] {s : ℕ → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, IsClosed (s n)) (h's : ∀ n, IsBounded (s n)) (h : ∀ N, (⋂ n ≤ N, s n).Nonempty)
(h' : Tendsto (fun n => diam (s n)) atTop (𝓝 0)) : (⋂ n, s n).Nonempty :=
(hs 0).isComplete.nonempty_iInter_of_nonempty_biInter hs h's h h'
end Diam
end Metric
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: the diameter of a set is always nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Metric.diam _]
def evalDiam : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Metric.diam _ $inst $s) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(Metric.diam_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
|
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Bounded.lean | 526 | 528 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift : Type extends ℝ →o ℝ where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one _ := rfl
one_mul _ := rfl
mul_assoc _ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => x.toAdd + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
-/
/-- Monotone circle maps form a lattice with respect to the pointwise order -/
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun _ _ h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun _ _ h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf _ _ _ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
/-!
### Estimates on `(f * g) 0`
We prove the estimates `f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉` and some corollaries with added/removed
floors and ceils.
We also prove that for two semiconjugate maps `g₁`, `g₂`, the distance between `g₁ 0` and `g₂ 0`
is less than two.
-/
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_intCast _ _
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_intCast _ _
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_intCast _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_intCast _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
/-!
### Limits at infinities and continuity
-/
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
/-!
### Estimates on `(f^n) x`
If we know that `f x` is `≤`/`<`/`≥`/`>`/`=` to `x + m`, then we have a similar estimate on
`f^[n] x` and `x + n * m`.
For `≤`, `≥`, and `=` we formulate both `of` (implication) and `iff` versions because implications
work for `n = 0`. For `<` and `>` we formulate only `iff` versions.
-/
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
| theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 518 | 520 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic
/-!
# Zeckendorf's Theorem
This file proves Zeckendorf's theorem: Every natural number can be written uniquely as a sum of
distinct non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsZeckendorfRep`: Predicate for a list to be an increasing sequence of non-consecutive
natural numbers greater than or equal to `2`, namely a Zeckendorf representation.
* `Nat.greatestFib`: Greatest index of a Fibonacci number less than or equal to some natural.
* `Nat.zeckendorf`: Send a natural number to its Zeckendorf representation.
* `Nat.zeckendorfEquiv`: Zeckendorf's theorem, in the form of an equivalence between natural numbers
and Zeckendorf representations.
## TODO
We could prove that the order induced by `zeckendorfEquiv` on Zeckendorf representations is exactly
the lexicographic order.
## Tags
fibonacci, zeckendorf, digit
-/
open List Nat
-- TODO: The `local` attribute makes this not considered as an instance by linters
@[nolint defLemma docBlame]
local instance : IsTrans ℕ fun a b ↦ b + 2 ≤ a where
trans _a _b _c hba hcb := hcb.trans <| le_self_add.trans hba
namespace List
/-- A list of natural numbers is a Zeckendorf representation (of a natural number) if it is an
increasing sequence of non-consecutive numbers greater than or equal to `2`.
This is relevant for Zeckendorf's theorem, since if we write a natural `n` as a sum of Fibonacci
numbers `(l.map fib).sum`, `IsZeckendorfRep l` exactly means that we can't simplify any expression
of the form `fib n + fib (n + 1) = fib (n + 2)`, `fib 1 = fib 2` or `fib 0 = 0` in the sum. -/
def IsZeckendorfRep (l : List ℕ) : Prop := (l ++ [0]).Chain' (fun a b ↦ b + 2 ≤ a)
@[simp]
lemma IsZeckendorfRep_nil : IsZeckendorfRep [] := by simp [IsZeckendorfRep]
| lemma IsZeckendorfRep.sum_fib_lt : ∀ {n l}, IsZeckendorfRep l → (∀ a ∈ (l ++ [0]).head?, a < n) →
(l.map fib).sum < fib n
| _, [], _, hn => fib_pos.2 <| hn _ rfl
| n, a :: l, hl, hn => by
simp only [IsZeckendorfRep, cons_append, chain'_iff_pairwise, pairwise_cons] at hl
have : ∀ b, b ∈ head? (l ++ [0]) → b < a - 1 :=
fun b hb ↦ lt_tsub_iff_right.2 <| hl.1 _ <| mem_of_mem_head? hb
simp only [mem_append, mem_singleton, ← chain'_iff_pairwise, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq,
zero_add] at hl
simp only [map, List.sum_cons]
refine (add_lt_add_left (sum_fib_lt hl.2 this) _).trans_le ?_
rw [add_comm, ← fib_add_one (hl.1.2.trans_lt' zero_lt_two).ne']
exact fib_mono (hn _ rfl)
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Fib/Zeckendorf.lean | 53 | 65 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Rat
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
/-!
# The tensor product of R-algebras
This file provides results about the multiplicative structure on `A ⊗[R] B` when `R` is a
commutative (semi)ring and `A` and `B` are both `R`-algebras. On these tensor products,
multiplication is characterized by `(a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)`.
## Main declarations
- `LinearMap.baseChange A f` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗ f`, for an `R`-linear map `f`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.semiring`: the ring structure on `A ⊗[R] B` for two `R`-algebras `A`, `B`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.leftAlgebra`: the `S`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`, for when `A` is
additionally an `S` algebra.
- the structure isomorphisms
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A` (usually used with `S = R` or `S = A`)
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C))`
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv`: a universal property for the tensor product of algebras.
## References
* [C. Kassel, *Quantum Groups* (§II.4)][Kassel1995]
-/
assert_not_exists Equiv.Perm.cycleType
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open TensorProduct
/-!
### The base-change of a linear map of `R`-modules to a linear map of `A`-modules
-/
section Semiring
variable {R A B M N P : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
variable (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variable (A) in
/-- `baseChange A f` for `f : M →ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`.
This "base change" operation is also known as "extension of scalars". -/
def baseChange (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) f
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (a : A) (x : M) : f.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ f x :=
rfl
theorem baseChange_eq_ltensor : (f.baseChange A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.lTensor A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_add : (f + g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A + g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: added `-baseChange_tmul`
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, -baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_zero : baseChange A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_smul : (r • f).baseChange A = r • f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_id : (.id : M →ₗ[R] M).baseChange A = .id := by
ext; simp
lemma baseChange_comp (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
(g ∘ₗ f).baseChange A = g.baseChange A ∘ₗ f.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R M) in
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_one : (1 : Module.End R M).baseChange A = 1 := baseChange_id
lemma baseChange_mul (f g : Module.End R M) :
(f * g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A * g.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R A M N)
/-- `baseChange A e` for `e : M ≃ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`. -/
def _root_.LinearEquiv.baseChange (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.congr (.refl _ _) e
/-- `baseChange` as a linear map.
When `M = N`, this is true more strongly as `Module.End.baseChangeHom`. -/
@[simps]
def baseChangeHom : (M →ₗ[R] N) →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N where
toFun := baseChange A
map_add' := baseChange_add
map_smul' := baseChange_smul
/-- `baseChange` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.Module.End.baseChangeHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End A (A ⊗[R] M) :=
.ofLinearMap (LinearMap.baseChangeHom _ _ _ _) (baseChange_one _ _) baseChange_mul
lemma baseChange_pow (f : Module.End R M) (n : ℕ) :
(f ^ n).baseChange A = f.baseChange A ^ n :=
map_pow (Module.End.baseChangeHom _ _ _) f n
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R A B M N : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A] [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_sub : (f - g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A - g.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_sub]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_neg : (-f).baseChange A = -f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_neg]
end Ring
section liftBaseChange
variable {R M N} (A) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module A N] [IsScalarTower R A N]
/--
If `M` is an `R`-module and `N` is an `A`-module, then `A`-linear maps `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N`
correspond to `R` linear maps `M →ₗ[R] N` by composing with `M → A ⊗ M`, `x ↦ 1 ⊗ x`.
-/
noncomputable
def liftBaseChangeEquiv : (M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[A] (A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N) :=
(LinearMap.ringLmapEquivSelf _ _ _).symm.trans (AlgebraTensorModule.lift.equiv _ _ _ _ _ _)
/-- If `N` is an `A` module, we may lift a linear map `M →ₗ[R] N` to `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N` -/
noncomputable
abbrev liftBaseChange (l : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N :=
LinearMap.liftBaseChangeEquiv A l
@[simp]
lemma liftBaseChange_tmul (l : M →ₗ[R] N) (x y) : l.liftBaseChange A (x ⊗ₜ y) = x • l y := rfl
lemma liftBaseChange_one_tmul (l : M →ₗ[R] N) (y) : l.liftBaseChange A (1 ⊗ₜ y) = l y := by simp
@[simp]
lemma liftBaseChangeEquiv_symm_apply (l : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] N) (x) :
(liftBaseChangeEquiv A).symm l x = l (1 ⊗ₜ x) := rfl
lemma liftBaseChange_comp {P} [AddCommMonoid P] [Module A P] [Module R P] [IsScalarTower R A P]
(l : M →ₗ[R] N) (l' : N →ₗ[A] P) :
l' ∘ₗ l.liftBaseChange A = (l'.restrictScalars R ∘ₗ l).liftBaseChange A := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
lemma range_liftBaseChange (l : M →ₗ[R] N) :
LinearMap.range (l.liftBaseChange A) = Submodule.span A (LinearMap.range l) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x using TensorProduct.induction_on
· simp
· rw [LinearMap.liftBaseChange_tmul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, rfl⟩)
· rw [map_add]
exact add_mem ‹_› ‹_›
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨1 ⊗ₜ x, by simp⟩
end liftBaseChange
end LinearMap
namespace Module.End
open LinearMap
variable (R M N : Type*)
[CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
/-- The map `LinearMap.lTensorHom` which sends `f ↦ 1 ⊗ f` as a morphism of algebras. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def lTensorAlgHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End R (N ⊗[R] M) :=
.ofLinearMap (lTensorHom (M := N)) (lTensor_id N M) (lTensor_mul N)
/-- The map `LinearMap.rTensorHom` which sends `f ↦ f ⊗ 1` as a morphism of algebras. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def rTensorAlgHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
.ofLinearMap (rTensorHom (M := N)) (rTensor_id N M) (rTensor_mul N)
end Module.End
namespace Algebra
namespace TensorProduct
universe uR uS uA uB uC uD uE uF
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS}
variable {A : Type uA} {B : Type uB} {C : Type uC} {D : Type uD} {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF}
/-!
### The `R`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`
-/
section AddCommMonoidWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoidWithOne A] [Module R A]
variable [AddCommMonoidWithOne B] [Module R B]
instance : One (A ⊗[R] B) where one := 1 ⊗ₜ 1
theorem one_def : (1 : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) :=
rfl
instance instAddCommMonoidWithOne : AddCommMonoidWithOne (A ⊗[R] B) where
natCast n := n ⊗ₜ 1
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ n := by simp [add_tmul, one_def]
add_comm := add_comm
theorem natCast_def (n : ℕ) : (n : A ⊗[R] B) = (n : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
theorem natCast_def' (n : ℕ) : (n : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (n : B) := by
rw [natCast_def, ← nsmul_one, smul_tmul, nsmul_one]
end AddCommMonoidWithOne
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
/-- (Implementation detail)
The multiplication map on `A ⊗[R] B`,
as an `R`-bilinear map.
-/
@[irreducible]
def mul : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] B :=
TensorProduct.map₂ (LinearMap.mul R A) (LinearMap.mul R B)
unseal mul in
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
mul (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
-- providing this instance separately makes some downstream code substantially faster
instance instMul : Mul (A ⊗[R] B) where
mul a b := mul a b
unseal mul in
@[simp]
theorem tmul_mul_tmul (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) :
a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁ * a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂ = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (b₁ * b₂) :=
rfl
unseal mul in
theorem _root_.SemiconjBy.tmul {a₁ a₂ a₃ : A} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : B}
(ha : SemiconjBy a₁ a₂ a₃) (hb : SemiconjBy b₁ b₂ b₃) :
SemiconjBy (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) (a₃ ⊗ₜ[R] b₃) :=
congr_arg₂ (· ⊗ₜ[R] ·) ha.eq hb.eq
nonrec theorem _root_.Commute.tmul {a₁ a₂ : A} {b₁ b₂ : B}
(ha : Commute a₁ a₂) (hb : Commute b₁ b₂) :
Commute (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] b₁) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] b₂) :=
ha.tmul hb
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
left_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
right_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
zero_mul a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_zero a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
-- we want `isScalarTower_right` to take priority since it's better for unification elsewhere
instance (priority := 100) isScalarTower_right [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S A]
[IsScalarTower S A A] [SMulCommClass R S A] : IsScalarTower S (A ⊗[R] B) (A ⊗[R] B) where
smul_assoc r x y := by
change r • x * y = r • (x * y)
induction y with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a b => induction x with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a' b' =>
dsimp
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', TensorProduct.smul_tmul', tmul_mul_tmul, smul_mul_assoc]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, add_mul _, *]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, mul_add _, *]
-- we want `Algebra.to_smulCommClass` to take priority since it's better for unification elsewhere
instance (priority := 100) sMulCommClass_right [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S A]
[SMulCommClass S A A] [SMulCommClass R S A] : SMulCommClass S (A ⊗[R] B) (A ⊗[R] B) where
smul_comm r x y := by
change r • (x * y) = x * r • y
induction y with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a b => induction x with
| zero => simp [smul_zero]
| tmul a' b' =>
dsimp
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', TensorProduct.smul_tmul', tmul_mul_tmul, mul_smul_comm]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, add_mul _, *]
| add x y hx hy => simp [smul_add, mul_add _, *]
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
protected theorem one_mul (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (1 ⊗ₜ 1) x = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp +contextual
protected theorem mul_one (x : A ⊗[R] B) : mul x (1 ⊗ₜ 1) = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp +contextual
instance instNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
one_mul := Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
__ := instAddCommMonoidWithOne
end NonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
unseal mul in
protected theorem mul_assoc (x y z : A ⊗[R] B) : mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) := by
-- restate as an equality of morphisms so that we can use `ext`
suffices LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul ∘ₗ mul =
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ LinearMap.lflip <| LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul.flip ∘ₗ mul).flip by
exact DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun this x) y) z
ext xa xb ya yb za zb
exact congr_arg₂ (· ⊗ₜ ·) (mul_assoc xa ya za) (mul_assoc xb yb zb)
instance instNonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
mul_assoc := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
end NonUnitalSemiring
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C]
instance instSemiring : Semiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
left_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
right_distrib a b c := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
zero_mul a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_zero a := by simp [HMul.hMul, Mul.mul]
mul_assoc := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_assoc
one_mul := Algebra.TensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := Algebra.TensorProduct.mul_one
natCast_zero := AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero
natCast_succ := AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ
@[simp]
theorem tmul_pow (a : A) (b : B) (k : ℕ) : a ⊗ₜ[R] b ^ k = (a ^ k) ⊗ₜ[R] (b ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [one_def]
· simp [pow_succ, ih]
/-- The ring morphism `A →+* A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
@[simps]
def includeLeftRingHom : A →+* A ⊗[R] B where
toFun a := a ⊗ₜ 1
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [add_tmul]
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by simp
variable [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S A]
instance leftAlgebra [SMulCommClass R S A] : Algebra S (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ commutes' := fun r x => by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply, includeLeftRingHom_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← smul_tmul', ← one_def, mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc, mul_one,
one_mul]
smul_def' := fun r x => by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply, includeLeftRingHom_apply]
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← smul_tmul', smul_mul_assoc, ← one_def, one_mul]
algebraMap := TensorProduct.includeLeftRingHom.comp (algebraMap S A) }
example : (Semiring.toNatAlgebra : Algebra ℕ (ℕ ⊗[ℕ] B)) = leftAlgebra := rfl
-- This is for the `undergrad.yaml` list.
/-- The tensor product of two `R`-algebras is an `R`-algebra. -/
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (A ⊗[R] B) :=
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply [SMulCommClass R S A] (r : S) :
algebraMap S (A ⊗[R] B) r = (algebraMap S A) r ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_apply' (r : R) :
algebraMap R (A ⊗[R] B) r = 1 ⊗ₜ algebraMap R B r := by
rw [algebraMap_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_tmul]
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `a` to `a ⊗ₜ 1`. -/
def includeLeft [SMulCommClass R S A] : A →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B :=
{ includeLeftRingHom with commutes' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem includeLeft_apply [SMulCommClass R S A] (a : A) :
(includeLeft : A →ₐ[S] A ⊗[R] B) a = a ⊗ₜ 1 :=
rfl
/-- The algebra morphism `B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B` sending `b` to `1 ⊗ₜ b`. -/
def includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B where
toFun b := 1 ⊗ₜ b
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [tmul_add]
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by simp
commutes' r := by simp only [algebraMap_apply']
@[simp]
theorem includeRight_apply (b : B) : (includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B) b = 1 ⊗ₜ b :=
rfl
theorem includeLeftRingHom_comp_algebraMap :
(includeLeftRingHom.comp (algebraMap R A) : R →+* A ⊗[R] B) =
includeRight.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap R B) := by
ext
simp
section ext
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- A version of `TensorProduct.ext` for `AlgHom`.
Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of `Algebra.TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply
lemmas specific to `A →ₐ[S] _` and `B →ₐ[R] _`; notably this allows recursion into nested tensor
products of algebras.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ext ⦃f g : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C⦄
(ha : f.comp includeLeft = g.comp includeLeft)
(hb : (f.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = (g.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight) :
f = g := by
apply AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective
ext a b
have := congr_arg₂ HMul.hMul (AlgHom.congr_fun ha a) (AlgHom.congr_fun hb b)
dsimp at *
rwa [← map_mul, ← map_mul, tmul_mul_tmul, one_mul, mul_one] at this
theorem ext' {g h : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C} (H : ∀ a b, g (a ⊗ₜ b) = h (a ⊗ₜ b)) : g = h :=
ext (AlgHom.ext fun _ => H _ _) (AlgHom.ext fun _ => H _ _)
end ext
end Semiring
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne A] [Module R A]
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne B] [Module R B]
instance instAddCommGroupWithOne : AddCommGroupWithOne (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instAddCommMonoidWithOne
intCast z := z ⊗ₜ (1 : B)
intCast_ofNat n := by simp [natCast_def]
intCast_negSucc n := by simp [natCast_def, add_tmul, neg_tmul, one_def]
theorem intCast_def (z : ℤ) : (z : A ⊗[R] B) = (z : A) ⊗ₜ (1 : B) := rfl
end AddCommGroupWithOne
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocRing : NonUnitalNonAssocRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section NonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonAssocRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonAssocRing : NonAssocRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonAssocSemiring
__ := instAddCommGroupWithOne
end NonAssocRing
section NonUnitalRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [NonUnitalRing B] [Module R B] [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
instance instNonUnitalRing : NonUnitalRing (A ⊗[R] B) where
toAddCommGroup := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonUnitalSemiring
end NonUnitalRing
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R B]
instance instCommSemiring : CommSemiring (A ⊗[R] B) where
toSemiring := inferInstance
mul_comm x y := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a₁ b₁
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a₂ b₂
simp [mul_comm]
· intro a₂ b₂ ha hb
simp [mul_add, add_mul, ha, hb]
· intro x₁ x₂ h₁ h₂
simp [mul_add, add_mul, h₁, h₂]
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
instance instRing : Ring (A ⊗[R] B) where
toSemiring := instSemiring
__ := TensorProduct.addCommGroup
__ := instNonAssocRing
theorem intCast_def' (z : ℤ) : (z : A ⊗[R] B) = (1 : A) ⊗ₜ (z : B) := by
rw [intCast_def, ← zsmul_one, smul_tmul, zsmul_one]
-- verify there are no diamonds
example : (instRing : Ring (A ⊗[R] B)).toAddCommGroup = addCommGroup := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
-- fails at `with_reducible_and_instances rfl` https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : (Ring.toIntAlgebra _ : Algebra ℤ (ℤ ⊗[ℤ] B)) = leftAlgebra := rfl
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommRing B] [Algebra R B]
instance instCommRing : CommRing (A ⊗[R] B) :=
{ toRing := inferInstance
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end CommRing
section RightAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R B]
/-- `S ⊗[R] T` has a `T`-algebra structure. This is not a global instance or else the action of
`S` on `S ⊗[R] S` would be ambiguous. -/
abbrev rightAlgebra : Algebra B (A ⊗[R] B) :=
includeRight.toRingHom.toAlgebra' fun b x => by
suffices LinearMap.mulLeft R (includeRight b) = LinearMap.mulRight R (includeRight b) from
congr($this x)
ext xa xb
simp [mul_comm]
attribute [local instance] TensorProduct.rightAlgebra
instance right_isScalarTower : IsScalarTower R B (A ⊗[R] B) :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq fun r => (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight.commutes r).symm
end RightAlgebra
/-- Verify that typeclass search finds the ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example [Ring A] [Ring B] : Ring (A ⊗[ℤ] B) := by infer_instance
/-- Verify that typeclass search finds the comm_ring structure on `A ⊗[ℤ] B`
when `A` and `B` are merely comm_rings, by treating both as `ℤ`-algebras.
-/
example [CommRing A] [CommRing B] : CommRing (A ⊗[ℤ] B) := by infer_instance
/-!
We now build the structure maps for the symmetric monoidal category of `R`-algebras.
-/
section Monoidal
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra S C]
variable [Semiring D] [Algebra R D]
/-- To check a linear map preserves multiplication, it suffices to check it on pure tensors. See
`algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct` for a bundled version. -/
lemma _root_.LinearMap.map_mul_of_map_mul_tmul {f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C}
(hf : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(x y : A ⊗[R] B) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
f.map_mul_iff.2 (by
-- these instances are needed by the statement of `ext`, but not by the current definition.
letI : Algebra R C := RestrictScalars.algebra R S C
letI : IsScalarTower R S C := RestrictScalars.isScalarTower R S C
ext
dsimp
exact hf _ _ _ _) x y
/-- Build an algebra morphism from a linear map out of a tensor product, and evidence that on pure
tensors, it preserves multiplication and the identity.
Note that we state `h_one` using `1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1` instead of `1` so that lemmas about `f` applied to pure
tensors can be directly applied by the caller (without needing `TensorProduct.one_def`).
-/
def algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C)
(h_mul : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(h_one : f (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1) : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap f h_one (f.map_mul_of_map_mul_tmul h_mul)
@[simp]
theorem algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : A ⊗[R] B →ₐ[S] C) x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a tensor product, and evidence
that on pure tensors, it preserves multiplication and the identity.
Note that we state `h_one` using `1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1` instead of `1` so that lemmas about `f` applied to pure
tensors can be directly applied by the caller (without needing `TensorProduct.one_def`).
-/
def algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₗ[S] C)
(h_mul : ∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B), f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂))
(h_one : f (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1) : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[S] C :=
{ algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (f : A ⊗[R] B →ₗ[S] C) h_mul h_one, f with }
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[S] C) x = f x :=
rfl
variable [Algebra R C]
/-- Build an algebra equivalence from a linear equivalence out of a triple tensor product,
and evidence of multiplicativity on pure tensors.
-/
def algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct (f : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₗ[R] D)
(h_mul :
∀ (a₁ a₂ : A) (b₁ b₂ : B) (c₁ c₂ : C),
f ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂) ⊗ₜ (c₁ * c₂)) = f (a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁ ⊗ₜ c₁) * f (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂ ⊗ₜ c₂))
(h_one : f (((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : C)) = 1) :
(A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv f h_one <| f.map_mul_iff.2 <| by
ext
dsimp
exact h_mul _ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct_apply (f h_mul h_one x) :
(algEquivOfLinearEquivTripleTensorProduct f h_mul h_one : (A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C ≃ₐ[R] D) x = f x :=
rfl
section lift
variable [IsScalarTower R S C]
/-- The forward direction of the universal property of tensor products of algebras; any algebra
morphism from the tensor product can be factored as the product of two algebra morphisms that
commute.
See `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv` for the fact that every morphism factors this way. -/
def lift (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) : (A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct
(AlgebraTensorModule.lift <|
letI restr : (C →ₗ[S] C) →ₗ[S] _ :=
{ toFun := (·.restrictScalars R)
map_add' := fun _ _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl }
LinearMap.flip <| (restr ∘ₗ LinearMap.mul S C ∘ₗ f.toLinearMap).flip ∘ₗ g)
(fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => show f (a₁ * a₂) * g (b₁ * b₂) = f a₁ * g b₁ * (f a₂ * g b₂) by
rw [map_mul, map_mul, (hfg a₂ b₁).mul_mul_mul_comm])
(show f 1 * g 1 = 1 by rw [map_one, map_one, one_mul])
@[simp]
theorem lift_tmul (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y))
(a : A) (b : B) :
lift f g hfg (a ⊗ₜ b) = f a * g b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_includeLeft_includeRight :
lift includeLeft includeRight (fun _ _ => (Commute.one_right _).tmul (Commute.one_left _)) =
.id S (A ⊗[R] B) := by
ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_includeLeft (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
(lift f g hfg).comp includeLeft = f :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_includeRight (f : A →ₐ[S] C) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) (hfg : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
((lift f g hfg).restrictScalars R).comp includeRight = g :=
AlgHom.ext <| by simp
/-- The universal property of the tensor product of algebras.
Pairs of algebra morphisms that commute are equivalent to algebra morphisms from the tensor product.
This is `Algebra.TensorProduct.lift` as an equivalence.
See also `GradedTensorProduct.liftEquiv` for an alternative commutativity requirement for graded
algebra. -/
@[simps]
def liftEquiv : {fg : (A →ₐ[S] C) × (B →ₐ[R] C) // ∀ x y, Commute (fg.1 x) (fg.2 y)}
≃ ((A ⊗[R] B) →ₐ[S] C) where
toFun fg := lift fg.val.1 fg.val.2 fg.prop
invFun f' := ⟨(f'.comp includeLeft, (f'.restrictScalars R).comp includeRight), fun _ _ =>
((Commute.one_right _).tmul (Commute.one_left _)).map f'⟩
left_inv fg := by ext <;> simp
right_inv f' := by ext <;> simp
end lift
end
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Algebra S C] [IsScalarTower R S C]
variable [Semiring D] [Algebra R D]
variable [Semiring E] [Algebra R E] [Algebra S E] [IsScalarTower R S E]
variable [Semiring F] [Algebra R F]
section
variable (R A)
/-- The base ring is a left identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
-/
protected nonrec def lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (TensorProduct.lid R A) (by
simp only [mul_smul, lid_tmul, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc, Algebra.mul_smul_comm]
simp_rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm]
simp)
(by simp [Algebra.smul_def])
@[simp] theorem lid_toLinearEquiv :
(TensorProduct.lid R A).toLinearEquiv = _root_.TensorProduct.lid R A := rfl
variable {R} {A} in
@[simp]
theorem lid_tmul (r : R) (a : A) : TensorProduct.lid R A (r ⊗ₜ a) = r • a := rfl
variable {A} in
@[simp]
theorem lid_symm_apply (a : A) : (TensorProduct.lid R A).symm a = 1 ⊗ₜ a := rfl
variable (S)
/-- The base ring is a right identity for the tensor product of algebra, up to algebra isomorphism.
Note that if `A` is commutative this can be instantiated with `S = A`.
-/
protected nonrec def rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A :=
algEquivOfLinearEquivTensorProduct (AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S A)
(fun a₁ a₂ r₁ r₂ => smul_mul_smul_comm r₁ a₁ r₂ a₂ |>.symm)
(one_smul R _)
@[simp] theorem rid_toLinearEquiv :
| (TensorProduct.rid R S A).toLinearEquiv = AlgebraTensorModule.rid R S A := rfl
variable {R A} in
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 818 | 820 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Basic
/-!
# Functoriality of adic completions
In this file we establish functorial properties of the adic completion.
## Main definitions
- `AdicCauchySequence.map I f`: the linear map on `I`-adic cauchy sequences induced by `f`
- `AdicCompletion.map I f`: the linear map on `I`-adic completions induced by `f`
## Main results
- `sumEquivOfFintype`: adic completion commutes with finite sums
- `piEquivOfFintype`: adic completion commutes with finite products
-/
suppress_compilation
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R)
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable {P : Type*} [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P]
variable {T : Type*} [AddCommGroup T] [Module (AdicCompletion I R) T]
namespace LinearMap
/-- `R`-linear version of `reduceModIdeal`. -/
private def reduceModIdealAux (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
M ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M) →ₗ[R] N ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N) :=
Submodule.mapQ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M) (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N) f
(fun x hx ↦ by
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on hx (fun r hr x _ ↦ ?_) (fun x y hx hy ↦ ?_)
· simp [Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr Submodule.mem_top]
· simp [Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy])
@[local simp]
private theorem reduceModIdealAux_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) :
(f.reduceModIdealAux I) (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) x) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N)) (f x) :=
rfl
/-- The induced linear map on the quotients mod `I • ⊤`. -/
def reduceModIdeal (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
M ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M) →ₗ[R ⧸ I] N ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N) where
toFun := f.reduceModIdealAux I
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' r x := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn' r (fun r ↦ ?_)
refine Quotient.inductionOn' x (fun x ↦ ?_)
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.mk''_eq_mk, Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, Module.Quotient.mk_smul_mk,
Submodule.Quotient.mk_smul, LinearMapClass.map_smul, reduceModIdealAux_apply,
RingHomCompTriple.comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem reduceModIdeal_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) :
(f.reduceModIdeal I) (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) x) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N)) (f x) :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace AdicCompletion
open LinearMap
theorem transitionMap_comp_reduceModIdeal (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) : transitionMap I N hmn ∘ₗ f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) =
(f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ m) : _ →ₗ[R] _) ∘ₗ transitionMap I M hmn := by
ext x
simp
namespace AdicCauchySequence
/-- A linear map induces a linear map on adic cauchy sequences. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : AdicCauchySequence I M →ₗ[R] AdicCauchySequence I N where
toFun a := ⟨fun n ↦ f (a n), fun {m n} hmn ↦ by
have hm : Submodule.map f (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R M) ≤ (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R N) := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'']
exact smul_mono_right _ le_top
apply SModEq.mono hm
apply SModEq.map (a.property hmn) f⟩
map_add' a b := by ext n; simp
map_smul' r a := by ext n; simp
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map I (LinearMap.id (M := M)) = LinearMap.id :=
rfl
theorem map_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
map I g ∘ₗ map I f = map I (g ∘ₗ f) :=
rfl
theorem map_comp_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (a : AdicCauchySequence I M) :
map I g (map I f a) = map I (g ∘ₗ f) a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : map I (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 :=
rfl
end AdicCauchySequence
/-- `R`-linear version of `adicCompletion`. -/
private def adicCompletionAux (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[R] AdicCompletion I N :=
AdicCompletion.lift I (fun n ↦ reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) f ∘ₗ AdicCompletion.eval I M n)
(fun {m n} hmn ↦ by rw [← comp_assoc, AdicCompletion.transitionMap_comp_reduceModIdeal,
comp_assoc, transitionMap_comp_eval])
@[local simp]
private theorem adicCompletionAux_val_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {n : ℕ} (x : AdicCompletion I M) :
(adicCompletionAux I f x).val n = f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) (x.val n) :=
rfl
/-- A linear map induces a map on adic completions. -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[AdicCompletion I R] AdicCompletion I N where
toFun := adicCompletionAux I f
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' r x := by
ext n
simp only [adicCompletionAux_val_apply, smul_eval, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.id_apply]
rw [val_smul_eq_evalₐ_smul, val_smul_eq_evalₐ_smul, map_smul]
@[simp]
theorem map_val_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {n : ℕ} (x : AdicCompletion I M) :
(map I f x).val n = f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) (x.val n) :=
rfl
/-- Equality of maps out of an adic completion can be checked on Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem map_ext {N} {f g : AdicCompletion I M → N}
(h : ∀ (a : AdicCauchySequence I M),
f (AdicCompletion.mk I M a) = g (AdicCompletion.mk I M a)) :
f = g := by
ext x
apply induction_on I M x h
/-- Equality of linear maps out of an adic completion can be checked on Cauchy sequences. -/
@[ext]
theorem map_ext' {f g : AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[AdicCompletion I R] T}
(h : ∀ (a : AdicCauchySequence I M),
f (AdicCompletion.mk I M a) = g (AdicCompletion.mk I M a)) :
f = g := by
ext x
apply induction_on I M x h
/-- Equality of linear maps out of an adic completion can be checked on Cauchy sequences. -/
@[ext]
theorem map_ext'' {f g : AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[R] N}
(h : f.comp (AdicCompletion.mk I M) = g.comp (AdicCompletion.mk I M)) :
f = g := by
ext x
apply induction_on I M x (fun a ↦ LinearMap.ext_iff.mp h a)
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem map_id :
map I (LinearMap.id (M := M)) =
LinearMap.id (R := AdicCompletion I R) (M := AdicCompletion I M) := by
ext a n
| simp
theorem map_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
map I g ∘ₗ map I f = map I (g ∘ₗ f) := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdicCompletion/Functoriality.lean | 173 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes, Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.CoreAttrs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Factorial and variants
This file defines the factorial, along with the ascending and descending variants.
For the proof that the factorial of `n` counts the permutations of an `n`-element set,
see `Fintype.card_perm`.
## Main declarations
* `Nat.factorial`: The factorial.
* `Nat.ascFactorial`: The ascending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from `n` to
`n + k - 1`.
* `Nat.descFactorial`: The descending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from
`n - k + 1` to `n`.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.factorial n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| succ n => succ n * factorial n
/-- factorial notation `(n)!` for `Nat.factorial n`.
In Lean, names can end with exclamation marks (e.g. `List.get!`), so you cannot write
`n!` in Lean, but must write `(n)!` or `n !` instead. The former is preferred, since
Lean can confuse the `!` in `n !` as the (prefix) boolean negation operation in some
cases.
For numerals the parentheses are not required, so e.g. `0!` or `1!` work fine.
Todo: replace occurrences of `n !` with `(n)!` in Mathlib. -/
scoped notation:10000 n "!" => Nat.factorial n
section Factorial
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 :=
rfl
theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n ! :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 :=
rfl
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : n ≠ 0) : n * (n - 1)! = n ! :=
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn) ▸ rfl
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| succ n => Nat.mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n ! ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ∣ n ! := by
induction h with
| refl => exact Nat.dvd_refl _
| step _ ih => exact Nat.dvd_trans ih (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem dvd_factorial : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ n !
| succ _, _, _, h => Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem factorial_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ≤ n ! :=
le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
theorem factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ! * (m + 1) ^ n ≤ (m + n)!
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n + 1 => by
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (_ + 1), Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial (succ_le_succ (le_add_right _ _))
theorem factorial_lt (hn : 0 < n) : n ! < m ! ↔ n < m := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_le.mp fun hmn => Nat.not_le_of_lt h (factorial_le hmn), fun h => ?_⟩
have : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → n ! < (n + 1)! := by
intro k hk
rw [factorial_succ, succ_mul, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos]
exact Nat.mul_pos hk k.factorial_pos
induction h generalizing hn with
| refl => exact this hn
| step hnk ih => exact lt_trans (ih hn) <| this <| lt_trans hn <| lt_of_succ_le hnk
@[gcongr]
lemma factorial_lt_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : n < m) : n ! < m ! := (factorial_lt hn).mpr h
@[simp] lemma one_lt_factorial : 1 < n ! ↔ 1 < n := factorial_lt Nat.one_pos
@[simp]
theorem factorial_eq_one : n ! = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_factorial, h]
apply lt_irrefl
· rintro (_|_|_) <;> rfl
theorem factorial_inj (hn : 1 < n) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, congr_arg _⟩
obtain hnm | rfl | hnm := lt_trichotomy n m
· rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
· rfl
rw [← one_lt_factorial, h, one_lt_factorial] at hn
rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
theorem factorial_inj' (h : 1 < n ∨ 1 < m) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
obtain hn|hm := h
· exact factorial_inj hn
· rw [eq_comm, factorial_inj hm, eq_comm]
theorem self_le_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≤ n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| k + 1 => Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.one_le_of_lt k.factorial_pos)
theorem lt_factorial_self {n : ℕ} (hi : 3 ≤ n) : n < n ! := by
have : 0 < n := by omega
have hn : 1 < pred n := le_pred_of_lt (succ_le_iff.mp hi)
rw [← succ_pred_eq_of_pos ‹0 < n›, factorial_succ]
exact (Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right (pred n).succ_pos).2
((Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn (self_le_factorial _)))
theorem add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ {i : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
i + (n + 1)! < (i + n + 1)! := by
rw [factorial_succ (i + _), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul]
have := (i + n).self_le_factorial
refine Nat.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ((Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right ?_).2 ?_))
(factorial_le ?_) <;> omega
theorem add_factorial_lt_factorial_add {i n : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
i + n ! < (i + n)! := by
cases hn
· rw [factorial_one]
exact lt_factorial_self (succ_le_succ hi)
exact add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ _ hi
theorem add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ (i : ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
i + (n + 1)! ≤ (i + (n + 1))! := by
cases (le_or_lt (2 : ℕ) i)
· rw [← Nat.add_assoc]
apply Nat.le_of_lt
apply add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ
assumption
· match i with
| 0 => simp
| 1 =>
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ (1 + n), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_comm 1 n,
Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
exact Nat.mul_pos n.succ_pos n.succ.factorial_pos
| succ (succ n) => contradiction
theorem add_factorial_le_factorial_add (i : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : i + n ! ≤ (i + n)! := by
rcases n1 with - | @h
· exact self_le_factorial _
exact add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ i h
theorem factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) : n ! * n ^ (m - n) ≤ m ! := by
calc
_ ≤ n ! * (n + 1) ^ (m - n) := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ ≤ _ := by simpa [hnm] using @Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial n (m - n)
lemma factorial_le_pow : ∀ n, n ! ≤ n ^ n
| 0 => le_refl _
| n + 1 =>
calc
_ ≤ (n + 1) * n ^ n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ n.factorial_le_pow
_ ≤ (n + 1) * (n + 1) ^ n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ = _ := by rw [pow_succ']
end Factorial
/-! ### Ascending and descending factorials -/
section AscFactorial
/-- `n.ascFactorial k = n (n + 1) ⋯ (n + k - 1)`. This is closely related to `ascPochhammer`, but
much less general. -/
def ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| k + 1 => (n + k) * ascFactorial n k
@[simp]
theorem ascFactorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.ascFactorial 0 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem ascFactorial_succ {n k : ℕ} : n.ascFactorial k.succ = (n + k) * n.ascFactorial k :=
rfl
theorem zero_ascFactorial : ∀ (k : ℕ), (0 : ℕ).ascFactorial k.succ = 0
| 0 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, ascFactorial_zero, Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_mul]
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, zero_ascFactorial k, Nat.mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem one_ascFactorial : ∀ (k : ℕ), (1 : ℕ).ascFactorial k = k.factorial
| 0 => ascFactorial_zero 1
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, one_ascFactorial k, Nat.add_comm, factorial_succ]
theorem succ_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, n * n.succ.ascFactorial k = (n + k) * n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [Nat.add_zero, ascFactorial_zero, ascFactorial_zero]
| k + 1 => by rw [ascFactorial, Nat.mul_left_comm, succ_ascFactorial n k, ascFactorial, succ_add,
← Nat.add_assoc]
/-- `(n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k) ! / n !` but without ℕ-division. See
`Nat.ascFactorial_eq_div` for the version with ℕ-division. -/
theorem factorial_mul_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k, n ! * (n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k)!
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.mul_one]
| k + 1 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, ← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (n + 1 + k),
← Nat.mul_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial n k, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.add_right_comm]
/-- `n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! / (n - 1)!` for `n > 0` but without ℕ-division. See
`Nat.ascFactorial_eq_div` for the version with ℕ-division. Consider using
`factorial_mul_ascFactorial` to avoid complications of ℕ-subtraction. -/
theorem factorial_mul_ascFactorial' (n k : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) :
(n - 1) ! * n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_comm h, Nat.sub_one]
nth_rw 2 [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq h rfl]
rw [Nat.sub_one, factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
theorem ascFactorial_mul_ascFactorial (n l k : ℕ) :
n.ascFactorial l * (n + l).ascFactorial k = n.ascFactorial (l + k) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
cases l
· simp only [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.one_mul, Nat.zero_add]
· simp only [Nat.add_right_comm, zero_ascFactorial, Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_mul]
| succ n' =>
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel (factorial_pos n')
simp only [Nat.add_assoc, ← Nat.mul_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
rw [Nat.add_comm 1 l, ← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial, Nat.add_assoc]
/-- Avoid in favor of `Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial` if you can. ℕ-division isn't worth it. -/
theorem ascFactorial_eq_div (n k : ℕ) : (n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k)! / n ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right n.factorial_ne_zero (factorial_mul_ascFactorial _ _)
/-- Avoid in favor of `Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial'` if you can. ℕ-division isn't worth it. -/
theorem ascFactorial_eq_div' (n k : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) :
n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! / (n - 1) ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right (n - 1).factorial_ne_zero (factorial_mul_ascFactorial' _ _ h)
theorem ascFactorial_of_sub {n k : ℕ} :
(n - k) * (n - k + 1).ascFactorial k = (n - k).ascFactorial (k + 1) := by
rw [succ_ascFactorial, ascFactorial_succ]
theorem pow_succ_le_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k : ℕ, n ^ k ≤ n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.pow_zero]
| k + 1 => by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm, ascFactorial_succ, ← succ_ascFactorial]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul (Nat.le_refl n)
(Nat.le_trans (Nat.pow_le_pow_left (le_succ n) k) (pow_succ_le_ascFactorial n.succ k))
theorem pow_lt_ascFactorial' (n k : ℕ) : (n + 1) ^ (k + 2) < (n + 1).ascFactorial (k + 2) := by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, ascFactorial, Nat.mul_comm]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right k.succ_pos)
(pow_succ_le_ascFactorial n.succ _) (Nat.pow_pos n.succ_pos)
theorem pow_lt_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → (n + 1) ^ k < (n + 1).ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 => by intro; contradiction
| k + 2 => fun _ => pow_lt_ascFactorial' n k
theorem ascFactorial_le_pow_add (n : ℕ) : ∀ k : ℕ, (n+1).ascFactorial k ≤ (n + k) ^ k
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.pow_zero]
| k + 1 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm n 1 k]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right _
(Nat.le_trans (ascFactorial_le_pow_add _ k) (Nat.pow_le_pow_left (le_succ _) _))
theorem ascFactorial_lt_pow_add (n : ℕ) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → (n + 1).ascFactorial k < (n + k) ^ k
| 0 => by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 => by intro; contradiction
| k + 2 => fun _ => by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm, ascFactorial_succ, succ_add_eq_add_succ n (k + 1)]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (le_refl _) (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (ascFactorial_le_pow_add n _)
(Nat.pow_lt_pow_left (Nat.lt_succ_self _) k.succ_ne_zero)) (succ_pos _)
theorem ascFactorial_pos (n k : ℕ) : 0 < (n + 1).ascFactorial k :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pow_pos n.succ_pos) (pow_succ_le_ascFactorial (n + 1) k)
end AscFactorial
section DescFactorial
/-- `n.descFactorial k = n! / (n - k)!` (as seen in `Nat.descFactorial_eq_div`), but
implemented recursively to allow for "quick" computation when using `norm_num`. This is closely
related to `descPochhammer`, but much less general. -/
def descFactorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| k + 1 => (n - k) * descFactorial n k
@[simp]
theorem descFactorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.descFactorial 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem descFactorial_succ (n k : ℕ) : n.descFactorial (k + 1) = (n - k) * n.descFactorial k :=
rfl
theorem zero_descFactorial_succ (k : ℕ) : (0 : ℕ).descFactorial (k + 1) = 0 := by
rw [descFactorial_succ, Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_mul]
theorem descFactorial_one (n : ℕ) : n.descFactorial 1 = n := by simp
theorem succ_descFactorial_succ (n : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, (n + 1).descFactorial (k + 1) = (n + 1) * n.descFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [descFactorial_zero, descFactorial_one, Nat.mul_one]
| succ k => by
rw [descFactorial_succ, succ_descFactorial_succ _ k, descFactorial_succ, succ_sub_succ,
Nat.mul_left_comm]
theorem succ_descFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (n + 1 - k) * (n + 1).descFactorial k = (n + 1) * n.descFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [Nat.sub_zero, descFactorial_zero, descFactorial_zero]
| k + 1 => by
rw [descFactorial, succ_descFactorial _ k, descFactorial_succ, succ_sub_succ, Nat.mul_left_comm]
theorem descFactorial_self : ∀ n : ℕ, n.descFactorial n = n !
| 0 => by rw [descFactorial_zero, factorial_zero]
| succ n => by rw [succ_descFactorial_succ, descFactorial_self n, factorial_succ]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Basic.lean | 340 | 341 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,733 | 1,734 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.RegularMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
/-!
# Categories where inclusions into coproducts are monomorphisms
If `C` is a category, the class `MonoCoprod C` expresses that left
inclusions `A ⟶ A ⨿ B` are monomorphisms when `HasCoproduct A B`
is satisfied. If it is so, it is shown that right inclusions are
also monomorphisms.
More generally, we deduce that when suitable coproducts exists, then
if `X : I → C` and `ι : J → I` is an injective map,
then the canonical morphism `∐ (X ∘ ι) ⟶ ∐ X` is a monomorphism.
It also follows that for any `i : I`, `Sigma.ι X i : X i ⟶ ∐ X` is
a monomorphism.
TODO: define distributive categories, and show that they satisfy `MonoCoprod`, see
<https://ncatlab.org/toddtrimble/published/distributivity+implies+monicity+of+coproduct+inclusions>
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
/-- This condition expresses that inclusion morphisms into coproducts are monomorphisms. -/
class MonoCoprod : Prop where
/-- the left inclusion of a colimit binary cofan is mono -/
binaryCofan_inl : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (c : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c), Mono c.inl
variable {C}
instance (priority := 100) monoCoprodOfHasZeroMorphisms [HasZeroMorphisms C] : MonoCoprod C :=
⟨fun A B c hc => by
haveI : IsSplitMono c.inl :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (SplitMono.mk (hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 A) 0)) (IsColimit.fac _ _ _))
infer_instance⟩
namespace MonoCoprod
theorem binaryCofan_inr {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] (c : BinaryCofan A B) (hc : IsColimit c) :
Mono c.inr := by
haveI hc' : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f₁ f₂ => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk f₂ f₁))
(by simp) (by simp)
(fun f₁ f₂ m h₁ h₂ => BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat))
exact binaryCofan_inl _ hc'
instance {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] [HasBinaryCoproduct A B] : Mono (coprod.inl : A ⟶ A ⨿ B) :=
binaryCofan_inl _ (colimit.isColimit _)
instance {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] [HasBinaryCoproduct A B] : Mono (coprod.inr : B ⟶ A ⨿ B) :=
binaryCofan_inr _ (colimit.isColimit _)
theorem mono_inl_iff {A B : C} {c₁ c₂ : BinaryCofan A B} (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) :
Mono c₁.inl ↔ Mono c₂.inl := by
suffices
∀ (c₁ c₂ : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c₁) (_ : IsColimit c₂) (_ : Mono c₁.inl),
Mono c₂.inl
by exact ⟨fun h₁ => this _ _ hc₁ hc₂ h₁, fun h₂ => this _ _ hc₂ hc₁ h₂⟩
intro c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂
intro
simpa only [IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom] using
mono_comp c₁.inl (hc₁.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc₂).hom
theorem mk' (h : ∀ A B : C, ∃ (c : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c), Mono c.inl) : MonoCoprod C :=
⟨fun A B c' hc' => by
obtain ⟨c, hc₁, hc₂⟩ := h A B
simpa only [mono_inl_iff hc' hc₁] using hc₂⟩
instance monoCoprodType : MonoCoprod (Type u) :=
MonoCoprod.mk' fun A B => by
refine ⟨BinaryCofan.mk (Sum.inl : A ⟶ A ⊕ B) Sum.inr, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _
(fun f₁ f₂ x => by
rcases x with x | x
exacts [f₁ x, f₂ x])
(fun f₁ f₂ => by rfl)
(fun f₁ f₂ => by rfl)
(fun f₁ f₂ m h₁ h₂ => by
funext x
rcases x with x | x
· exact congr_fun h₁ x
· exact congr_fun h₂ x)
· rw [mono_iff_injective]
intro a₁ a₂ h
simpa using h
section
variable {I₁ I₂ : Type*} {X : I₁ ⊕ I₂ → C} (c : Cofan X)
(c₁ : Cofan (X ∘ Sum.inl)) (c₂ : Cofan (X ∘ Sum.inr))
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂)
include hc hc₁ hc₂
/-- Given a family of objects `X : I₁ ⊕ I₂ → C`, a cofan of `X`, and two colimit cofans
of `X ∘ Sum.inl` and `X ∘ Sum.inr`, this is a cofan for `c₁.pt` and `c₂.pt` whose
point is `c.pt`. -/
@[simp]
def binaryCofanSum : BinaryCofan c₁.pt c₂.pt :=
BinaryCofan.mk (Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₁ (fun i₁ => c.inj (Sum.inl i₁)))
(Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₂ (fun i₂ => c.inj (Sum.inr i₂)))
/-- The binary cofan `binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂` is colimit. -/
def isColimitBinaryCofanSum : IsColimit (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂) :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f₁ f₂ => Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc (fun i => match i with
| Sum.inl i₁ => c₁.inj i₁ ≫ f₁
| Sum.inr i₂ => c₂.inj i₂ ≫ f₂))
(fun f₁ f₂ => Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₁ _ _ (by simp))
(fun f₁ f₂ => Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₂ _ _ (by simp))
(fun f₁ f₂ m hm₁ hm₂ => by
apply Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
rintro (i₁|i₂) <;> aesop_cat)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inl [MonoCoprod C] :
Mono (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inl :=
MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inl _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inr [MonoCoprod C] :
Mono (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inr :=
MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inr _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inl' [MonoCoprod C] (inl : c₁.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(hinl : ∀ (i₁ : I₁), c₁.inj i₁ ≫ inl = c.inj (Sum.inl i₁)) :
Mono inl := by
suffices inl = (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inl by
rw [this]
exact MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inl _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
exact Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₁ _ _ (by simpa using hinl)
lemma mono_binaryCofanSum_inr' [MonoCoprod C] (inr : c₂.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(hinr : ∀ (i₂ : I₂), c₂.inj i₂ ≫ inr = c.inj (Sum.inr i₂)) :
Mono inr := by
suffices inr = (binaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂).inr by
rw [this]
exact MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inr _ (isColimitBinaryCofanSum c c₁ c₂ hc hc₁ hc₂)
exact Cofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc₂ _ _ (by simpa using hinr)
end
section
variable [MonoCoprod C] {I J : Type*} (X : I → C) (ι : J → I)
lemma mono_of_injective_aux (hι : Function.Injective ι) (c : Cofan X) (c₁ : Cofan (X ∘ ι))
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(c₂ : Cofan (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1))
(hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) : Mono (Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₁ (fun i => c.inj (ι i))) := by
classical
let e := ((Equiv.ofInjective ι hι).sumCongr (Equiv.refl _)).trans (Equiv.Set.sumCompl _)
refine mono_binaryCofanSum_inl' (Cofan.mk c.pt (fun i' => c.inj (e i'))) _ _ ?_
hc₁ hc₂ _ (by simp [e])
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ((IsColimit.ofCoconeEquiv (Cocones.equivalenceOfReindexing
(Discrete.equivalence e) (Iso.refl _))).symm hc) (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _))
variable (hι : Function.Injective ι) (c : Cofan X) (c₁ : Cofan (X ∘ ι))
(hc : IsColimit c) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
include hι
include hc in
lemma mono_of_injective [HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Cofan.IsColimit.desc hc₁ (fun i => c.inj (ι i))) :=
mono_of_injective_aux X ι hι c c₁ hc hc₁ _ (colimit.isColimit _)
lemma mono_of_injective' [HasCoproduct (X ∘ ι)] [HasCoproduct X]
[HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Sigma.desc (f := X ∘ ι) (fun j => Sigma.ι X (ι j))) :=
mono_of_injective X ι hι _ _ (colimit.isColimit _) (colimit.isColimit _)
lemma mono_map'_of_injective [HasCoproduct (X ∘ ι)] [HasCoproduct X]
[HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range ι)ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Sigma.map' ι (fun j => 𝟙 ((X ∘ ι) j))) := by
convert mono_of_injective' X ι hι
apply Sigma.hom_ext
intro j
rw [Sigma.ι_comp_map', id_comp, colimit.ι_desc]
simp
end
section
variable [MonoCoprod C] {I : Type*} (X : I → C)
lemma mono_inj (c : Cofan X) (h : IsColimit c) (i : I)
[HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range (fun _ : Unit ↦ i))ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Cofan.inj c i) := by
let ι : Unit → I := fun _ ↦ i
have hι : Function.Injective ι := fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl
exact mono_of_injective X ι hι c (Cofan.mk (X i) (fun _ ↦ 𝟙 _)) h
| (mkCofanColimit _ (fun s => s.inj ()))
instance mono_ι [HasCoproduct X] (i : I)
[HasCoproduct (fun (k : ((Set.range (fun _ : Unit ↦ i))ᶜ : Set I)) => X k.1)] :
Mono (Sigma.ι X i) :=
mono_inj X _ (colimit.isColimit _) i
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/MonoCoprod.lean | 209 | 215 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Joey van Langen, Casper Putz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.ValMinAbs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Matrix
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
/-!
# Finite fields
This file contains basic results about finite fields.
Throughout most of this file, `K` denotes a finite field
and `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`.
See `RingTheory.IntegralDomain` for the fact that the unit group of a finite field is a
cyclic group, as well as the fact that every finite integral domain is a field
(`Fintype.fieldOfDomain`).
## Main results
1. `Fintype.card_units`: The unit group of a finite field has cardinality `q - 1`.
2. `sum_pow_units`: The sum of `x^i`, where `x` ranges over the units of `K`, is
- `q-1` if `q-1 ∣ i`
- `0` otherwise
3. `FiniteField.card`: The cardinality `q` is a power of the characteristic of `K`.
See `FiniteField.card'` for a variant.
## Notation
Throughout most of this file, `K` denotes a finite field
and `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`.
## Implementation notes
While `Fintype Kˣ` can be inferred from `Fintype K` in the presence of `DecidableEq K`,
in this file we take the `Fintype Kˣ` argument directly to reduce the chance of typeclass
diamonds, as `Fintype` carries data.
-/
variable {K : Type*} {R : Type*}
local notation "q" => Fintype.card K
open Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace FiniteField
section Polynomial
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
open Polynomial
/-- The cardinality of a field is at most `n` times the cardinality of the image of a degree `n`
polynomial -/
theorem card_image_polynomial_eval [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] {p : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p.degree) :
Fintype.card R ≤ natDegree p * #(univ.image fun x => eval x p) :=
Finset.card_le_mul_card_image _ _ (fun a _ =>
calc
_ = #(p - C a).roots.toFinset :=
congr_arg card (by simp [Finset.ext_iff, ← mem_roots_sub_C hp])
_ ≤ Multiset.card (p - C a).roots := Multiset.toFinset_card_le _
_ ≤ _ := card_roots_sub_C' hp)
/-- If `f` and `g` are quadratic polynomials, then the `f.eval a + g.eval b = 0` has a solution. -/
theorem exists_root_sum_quadratic [Fintype R] {f g : R[X]} (hf2 : degree f = 2) (hg2 : degree g = 2)
(hR : Fintype.card R % 2 = 1) : ∃ a b, f.eval a + g.eval b = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
suffices ¬Disjoint (univ.image fun x : R => eval x f)
(univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g)) by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_image] at this
push_neg at this
rcases this with ⟨x, ⟨a, _, ha⟩, ⟨b, _, hb⟩⟩
exact ⟨a, b, by rw [ha, ← hb, eval_neg, neg_add_cancel]⟩
fun hd : Disjoint _ _ =>
lt_irrefl (2 * #((univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) ∪ univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g))) <|
calc 2 * #((univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) ∪ univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g))
≤ 2 * Fintype.card R := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Finset.card_le_univ _)
_ = Fintype.card R + Fintype.card R := two_mul _
_ < natDegree f * #(univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) +
natDegree (-g) * #(univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g)) :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(lt_of_le_of_ne (card_image_polynomial_eval (by rw [hf2]; decide))
(mt (congr_arg (· % 2)) (by simp [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hf2, hR])))
(card_image_polynomial_eval (by rw [degree_neg, hg2]; decide)))
_ = 2 * #((univ.image fun x : R => eval x f) ∪ univ.image fun x : R => eval x (-g)) := by
rw [card_union_of_disjoint hd]
simp [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hf2, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some hg2, mul_add]
end Polynomial
theorem prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [Fintype Kˣ] :
∏ x : Kˣ, x = (-1 : Kˣ) := by
classical
have : (∏ x ∈ (@univ Kˣ _).erase (-1), x) = 1 :=
prod_involution (fun x _ => x⁻¹) (by simp)
(fun a => by simp +contextual [Units.inv_eq_self_iff])
(fun a => by simp [@inv_eq_iff_eq_inv _ _ a]) (by simp)
rw [← insert_erase (mem_univ (-1 : Kˣ)), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), this, mul_one]
theorem card_cast_subgroup_card_ne_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K] [Nontrivial K]
(G : Subgroup Kˣ) [Fintype G] : (Fintype.card G : K) ≠ 0 := by
let n := Fintype.card G
intro nzero
have ⟨p, char_p⟩ := CharP.exists K
have hd : p ∣ n := (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff K p n).mp nzero
cases CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero K p with
| inr pzero =>
exact (Fintype.card_pos).ne' <| Nat.eq_zero_of_zero_dvd <| pzero ▸ hd
| inl pprime =>
have fact_pprime := Fact.mk pprime
-- G has an element x of order p by Cauchy's theorem
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card p hd
-- F has an element u (= ↑↑x) of order p
let u := ((x : Kˣ) : K)
have hu : orderOf u = p := by rwa [orderOf_units, Subgroup.orderOf_coe]
-- u ^ p = 1 implies (u - 1) ^ p = 0 and hence u = 1 ...
have h : u = 1 := by
rw [← sub_left_inj, sub_self 1]
apply pow_eq_zero (n := p)
rw [sub_pow_char_of_commute, one_pow, ← hu, pow_orderOf_eq_one, sub_self]
exact Commute.one_right u
-- ... meaning x didn't have order p after all, contradiction
apply pprime.one_lt.ne
rw [← hu, h, orderOf_one]
/-- The sum of a nontrivial subgroup of the units of a field is zero. -/
theorem sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] (hg : G ≠ ⊥) :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = 0 := by
rw [Subgroup.ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨a, ha⟩
-- The action of a on G as an embedding
let a_mul_emb : G ↪ G := mulLeftEmbedding a
-- ... and leaves G unchanged
have h_unchanged : Finset.univ.map a_mul_emb = Finset.univ := by simp
-- Therefore the sum of x over a G is the sum of a x over G
have h_sum_map := Finset.univ.sum_map a_mul_emb fun x => ((x : Kˣ) : K)
-- ... and the former is the sum of x over G.
-- By algebraic manipulation, we have Σ G, x = ∑ G, a x = a ∑ G, x
simp only [h_unchanged, mulLeftEmbedding_apply, Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, ← mul_sum,
a_mul_emb] at h_sum_map
-- thus one of (a - 1) or ∑ G, x is zero
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) - 1) = 0 ∨ ∑ x : ↥G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) = 0 := by
rw [← mul_eq_zero, sub_mul, ← h_sum_map, one_mul, sub_self]
apply Or.resolve_left hzero
contrapose! ha
ext
rwa [← sub_eq_zero]
/-- The sum of a subgroup of the units of a field is 1 if the subgroup is trivial and 1 otherwise -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_units [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] [Decidable (G = ⊥)] :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = if G = ⊥ then 1 else 0 := by
by_cases G_bot : G = ⊥
· subst G_bot
simp only [univ_unique, sum_singleton, ↓reduceIte, Units.val_eq_one, OneMemClass.coe_eq_one]
rw [Set.default_coe_singleton]
rfl
· simp only [G_bot, ite_false]
exact sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero G_bot
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_pow_eq_zero [CommRing K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Fintype.card G) :
∑ x : G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at k_lt_card_G
nontriviality K
have := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain K
rcases (exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic k_pos k_lt_card_G) with ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
have h_multiset_map :
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) =
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) := by
simp_rw [← mul_pow]
have as_comp :
(fun x : ↥G => (((x : Kˣ) : K) * ((a : Kˣ) : K)) ^ k)
= (fun x : ↥G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) ∘ fun x : ↥G => x * a := by
funext x
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul]
rw [as_comp, ← Multiset.map_map]
congr
rw [eq_comm]
exact Multiset.map_univ_val_equiv (Equiv.mulRight a)
have h_multiset_map_sum : (Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum =
(Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum := by
rw [h_multiset_map]
rw [Multiset.sum_map_mul_right] at h_multiset_map_sum
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k - 1 : K)
* (Multiset.map (fun i : G => (i.val : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum = 0 := by
rw [sub_mul, mul_comm, ← h_multiset_map_sum, one_mul, sub_self]
rw [mul_eq_zero] at hzero
refine hzero.resolve_left fun h => ha ?_
ext
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
simp_rw [SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, OneMemClass.coe_one, Units.val_one, h]
section
variable [GroupWithZero K] [Fintype K]
theorem pow_card_sub_one_eq_one (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ^ (q - 1) = 1 := by
calc
a ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) = (Units.mk0 a ha ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) : Kˣ).1 := by
rw [Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_mk0]
_ = 1 := by
classical
rw [← Fintype.card_units, pow_card_eq_one]
rfl
theorem pow_card (a : K) : a ^ q = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [h]; apply zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos Fintype.card_pos, pow_succ, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one,
pow_card_sub_one_eq_one a h, one_mul]
theorem pow_card_pow (n : ℕ) (a : K) : a ^ q ^ n = a := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [pow_succ, pow_mul, ih, pow_card]
end
variable (K) [Field K] [Fintype K]
/-- The cardinality `q` is a power of the characteristic of `K`. -/
@[stacks 09HY "first part"]
theorem card (p : ℕ) [CharP K p] : ∃ n : ℕ+, Nat.Prime p ∧ q = p ^ (n : ℕ) := by
haveI hp : Fact p.Prime := ⟨CharP.char_is_prime K p⟩
letI : Module (ZMod p) K := { (ZMod.castHom dvd_rfl K : ZMod p →+* _).toModule with }
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := VectorSpace.card_fintype (ZMod p) K
rw [ZMod.card] at h
refine ⟨⟨n, ?_⟩, hp.1, h⟩
apply Or.resolve_left (Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n)
rintro rfl
rw [pow_zero] at h
have : (0 : K) = 1 := by apply Fintype.card_le_one_iff.mp (le_of_eq h)
exact absurd this zero_ne_one
-- this statement doesn't use `q` because we want `K` to be an explicit parameter
theorem card' : ∃ (p : ℕ), CharP K p ∧ ∃ (n : ℕ+), Nat.Prime p ∧ Fintype.card K = p ^ (n : ℕ) :=
let ⟨p, hc⟩ := CharP.exists K
⟨p, hc, @FiniteField.card K _ _ p hc⟩
lemma isPrimePow_card : IsPrimePow (Fintype.card K) := by
obtain ⟨p, _, n, hp, hn⟩ := card' K
exact ⟨p, n, Nat.prime_iff.mp hp, n.prop, hn.symm⟩
theorem cast_card_eq_zero : (q : K) = 0 := by
simp
theorem forall_pow_eq_one_iff (i : ℕ) : (∀ x : Kˣ, x ^ i = 1) ↔ q - 1 ∣ i := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := Kˣ)
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Nat.card_units, ← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hx,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
constructor
· intro h; apply h
· intro h y
simp_rw [← mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers] at hx
rcases hx y with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]
/-- The sum of `x ^ i` as `x` ranges over the units of a finite field of cardinality `q`
is equal to `0` unless `(q - 1) ∣ i`, in which case the sum is `q - 1`. -/
theorem sum_pow_units [DecidableEq K] (i : ℕ) :
(∑ x : Kˣ, (x ^ i : K)) = if q - 1 ∣ i then -1 else 0 := by
let φ : Kˣ →* K :=
{ toFun := fun x => x ^ i
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by intros; simp [mul_pow] }
have : Decidable (φ = 1) := by classical infer_instance
calc (∑ x : Kˣ, φ x) = if φ = 1 then Fintype.card Kˣ else 0 := sum_hom_units φ
_ = if q - 1 ∣ i then -1 else 0 := by
suffices q - 1 ∣ i ↔ φ = 1 by
simp only [this]
split_ifs; swap
· exact Nat.cast_zero
· rw [Fintype.card_units, Nat.cast_sub,
cast_card_eq_zero, Nat.cast_one, zero_sub]
show 1 ≤ q; exact Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨0⟩
rw [← forall_pow_eq_one_iff, DFunLike.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'; intro x; simp [φ, Units.ext_iff]
/-- The sum of `x ^ i` as `x` ranges over a finite field of cardinality `q`
is equal to `0` if `i < q - 1`. -/
theorem sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one (i : ℕ) (h : i < q - 1) : ∑ x : K, x ^ i = 0 := by
by_cases hi : i = 0
· simp only [hi, nsmul_one, sum_const, pow_zero, card_univ, cast_card_eq_zero]
classical
have hiq : ¬q - 1 ∣ i := by contrapose! h; exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi) h
let φ : Kˣ ↪ K := ⟨fun x ↦ x, Units.ext⟩
have : univ.map φ = univ \ {0} := by
ext x
simpa only [mem_map, mem_univ, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, true_and, mem_sdiff,
mem_singleton, φ] using isUnit_iff_ne_zero
calc
∑ x : K, x ^ i = ∑ x ∈ univ \ {(0 : K)}, x ^ i := by
rw [← sum_sdiff ({0} : Finset K).subset_univ, sum_singleton, zero_pow hi, add_zero]
_ = ∑ x : Kˣ, (x ^ i : K) := by simp [φ, ← this, univ.sum_map φ]
_ = 0 := by rw [sum_pow_units K i, if_neg]; exact hiq
section frobenius
variable (R) [CommRing R] [Algebra K R]
/-- If `R` is an algebra over a finite field `K`, the Frobenius `K`-algebra endomorphism of `R` is
given by raising every element of `R` to its `#K`-th power. -/
@[simps!] def frobeniusAlgHom : R →ₐ[K] R where
__ := powMonoidHom q
map_zero' := zero_pow Fintype.card_pos.ne'
map_add' _ _ := by
obtain ⟨p, _, _, hp, card_eq⟩ := card' K
nontriviality R
have : CharP R p := charP_of_injective_algebraMap' K R p
have : ExpChar R p := .prime hp
simp only [OneHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe, powMonoidHom_apply, card_eq]
exact add_pow_expChar_pow ..
commutes' _ := by simp [← RingHom.map_pow, pow_card]
theorem coe_frobeniusAlgHom : ⇑(frobeniusAlgHom K R) = (· ^ q) := rfl
/-- If `R` is a perfect ring and an algebra over a finite field `K`, the Frobenius `K`-algebra
endomorphism of `R` is an automorphism. -/
@[simps!] noncomputable def frobeniusAlgEquiv (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] [PerfectRing R p] : R ≃ₐ[K] R :=
.ofBijective (frobeniusAlgHom K R) <| by
obtain ⟨p', _, n, hp, card_eq⟩ := card' K
rw [coe_frobeniusAlgHom, card_eq]
have : ExpChar K p' := ExpChar.prime hp
nontriviality R
have := ExpChar.eq ‹_› (expChar_of_injective_algebraMap (algebraMap K R).injective p')
subst this
apply bijective_iterateFrobenius
variable (L : Type*) [Field L] [Algebra K L]
/-- If `L/K` is an algebraic extension of a finite field, the Frobenius `K`-algebra endomorphism
of `L` is an automorphism. -/
@[simps!] noncomputable def frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] : L ≃ₐ[K] L :=
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom K L).symm (frobeniusAlgHom K L)
theorem coe_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] :
⇑(frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L) = (· ^ q) := rfl
variable [Finite L]
open Polynomial in
theorem orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom : orderOf (frobeniusAlgHom K L) = Module.finrank K L :=
(orderOf_eq_iff Module.finrank_pos).mpr <| by
have := Fintype.ofFinite L
refine ⟨DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ ?_, fun m lt pos eq ↦ ?_⟩
· simp_rw [AlgHom.coe_pow, coe_frobeniusAlgHom, pow_iterate, AlgHom.one_apply,
← Module.card_eq_pow_finrank, pow_card]
have := card_le_degree_of_subset_roots (R := L) (p := X ^ q ^ m - X) (Z := univ) fun x _ ↦ by
simp_rw [mem_roots', IsRoot, eval_sub, eval_pow, eval_X]
have := DFunLike.congr_fun eq x
rw [AlgHom.coe_pow, coe_frobeniusAlgHom, pow_iterate, AlgHom.one_apply, ← sub_eq_zero] at this
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, this⟩
simpa [if_neg (Nat.one_lt_pow pos.ne' Fintype.one_lt_card).ne] using congr_arg (coeff · 1) h
refine this.not_lt (((natDegree_sub_le ..).trans_eq ?_).trans_lt <|
(Nat.pow_lt_pow_right Fintype.one_lt_card lt).trans_eq Module.card_eq_pow_finrank.symm)
simp [Nat.one_le_pow _ _ Fintype.card_pos]
theorem orderOf_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic :
orderOf (frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L) = Module.finrank K L := by
simpa [orderOf_eq_iff Module.finrank_pos, DFunLike.ext_iff] using orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom K L
theorem bijective_frobeniusAlgHom_pow :
Function.Bijective fun n : Fin (Module.finrank K L) ↦ frobeniusAlgHom K L ^ n.1 :=
let e := (finCongr <| orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom K L).symm.trans <|
finEquivPowers (orderOf_pos_iff.mp <| orderOf_frobeniusAlgHom K L ▸ Module.finrank_pos)
(Subtype.val_injective.comp e.injective).bijective_of_nat_card_le
((card_algHom_le_finrank K L L).trans_eq <| by simp)
theorem bijective_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic_pow :
Function.Bijective fun n : Fin (Module.finrank K L) ↦ frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L ^ n.1 :=
((Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom K L).bijective.of_comp_iff' _).mp <| by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, map_pow] using bijective_frobeniusAlgHom_pow K L
instance (K L) [Finite L] [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] : IsCyclic (L ≃ₐ[K] L) where
exists_zpow_surjective :=
have := Finite.of_injective _ (algebraMap K L).injective
have := Fintype.ofFinite K
⟨frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic K L,
fun f ↦ have ⟨n, hn⟩ := (bijective_frobeniusAlgEquivOfAlgebraic_pow K L).2 f; ⟨n, hn⟩⟩
end frobenius
open Polynomial
section
variable [Fintype K] (K' : Type*) [Field K'] {p n : ℕ}
theorem X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p - X : K'[X]).natDegree = p := by
have h1 : (X : K'[X]).degree < (X ^ p : K'[X]).degree := by
rw [degree_X_pow, degree_X]
exact mod_cast hp
rw [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt h1), natDegree_X_pow]
theorem X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_natDegree_eq (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : 1 < p) :
(X ^ p ^ n - X : K'[X]).natDegree = p ^ n :=
X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq K' <| Nat.one_lt_pow hn hp
theorem X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p - X : K'[X]) ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <|
calc
1 < _ := hp
_ = _ := (X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq K' hp).symm
theorem X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p ^ n - X : K'[X]) ≠ 0 :=
X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero K' <| Nat.one_lt_pow hn hp
end
theorem roots_X_pow_card_sub_X : roots (X ^ q - X : K[X]) = Finset.univ.val := by
classical
have aux : (X ^ q - X : K[X]) ≠ 0 := X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero K Fintype.one_lt_card
have : (roots (X ^ q - X : K[X])).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
rw [eq_univ_iff_forall]
intro x
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots aux, IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_pow, eval_X,
| sub_eq_zero, pow_card]
rw [← this, Multiset.toFinset_val, eq_comm, Multiset.dedup_eq_self]
apply nodup_roots
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Finite/Basic.lean | 436 | 438 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Partial values of a type
This file defines `Part α`, the partial values of a type.
`o : Part α` carries a proposition `o.Dom`, its domain, along with a function `get : o.Dom → α`, its
value. The rule is then that every partial value has a value but, to access it, you need to provide
a proof of the domain.
`Part α` behaves the same as `Option α` except that `o : Option α` is decidably `none` or `some a`
for some `a : α`, while the domain of `o : Part α` doesn't have to be decidable. That means you can
translate back and forth between a partial value with a decidable domain and an option, and
`Option α` and `Part α` are classically equivalent. In general, `Part α` is bigger than `Option α`.
In current mathlib, `Part ℕ`, aka `PartENat`, is used to move decidability of the order to
decidability of `PartENat.find` (which is the smallest natural satisfying a predicate, or `∞` if
there's none).
## Main declarations
`Option`-like declarations:
* `Part.none`: The partial value whose domain is `False`.
* `Part.some a`: The partial value whose domain is `True` and whose value is `a`.
* `Part.ofOption`: Converts an `Option α` to a `Part α` by sending `none` to `none` and `some a` to
`some a`.
* `Part.toOption`: Converts a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an `Option α`.
* `Part.equivOption`: Classical equivalence between `Part α` and `Option α`.
Monadic structure:
* `Part.bind`: `o.bind f` has value `(f (o.get _)).get _` (`f o` morally) and is defined when `o`
and `f (o.get _)` are defined.
* `Part.map`: Maps the value and keeps the same domain.
Other:
* `Part.restrict`: `Part.restrict p o` replaces the domain of `o : Part α` by `p : Prop` so long as
`p → o.Dom`.
* `Part.assert`: `assert p f` appends `p` to the domains of the values of a partial function.
* `Part.unwrap`: Gets the value of a partial value regardless of its domain. Unsound.
## Notation
For `a : α`, `o : Part α`, `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a`. Formally, it means
`o.Dom` and `o.get _ = a`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
/-- `Part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `Option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
/-- The domain of a partial value -/
Dom : Prop
/-- Extract a value from a partial value given a proof of `Dom` -/
get : Dom → α
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
@[simp] lemma toOption_eq_none (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption = none ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
/-- `Part` eta expansion -/
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def Mem (o : Part α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
/-- The `none` value in `Part` has a `False` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
/-- The `some a` value in `Part` has a `True` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
theorem mem_right_unique : ∀ {a : α} {o p : Part α}, a ∈ o → a ∈ p → o = p
| _, _, _, ⟨ho, _⟩, ⟨hp, _⟩ => ext' (iff_of_true ho hp) (by simp [*])
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
theorem Mem.right_unique : Relator.RightUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_right_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : Part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
-- `simp`-normal form is `toOption_eq_some_iff`.
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
@[simp]
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
/-- Converts an `Option α` into a `Part α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
/-- `Part α` is (classically) equivalent to `Option α`. -/
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
/-- We give `Part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ f g _ := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm _ _ f g := Part.ext fun _ => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
/-- The map operation for `Part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· simp
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (fun y => some (f y)) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
@[simp]
theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o := by
simp [map, Function.comp_assoc]
instance : Monad Part where
pure := @some
map := @map
bind := @Part.bind
instance : LawfulMonad
Part where
bind_pure_comp := @bind_some_eq_map
id_map f := by cases f; rfl
pure_bind := @bind_some
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc
map_const := by simp [Functor.mapConst, Functor.map]
--Porting TODO : In Lean3 these were automatic by a tactic
seqLeft_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
seqRight_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
pure_seq x y := ext'
(by simp [Seq.seq, Part.bind, assert, (· <$> ·), pure])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
bind_map x y := ext'
(by simp [(· >>= ·), Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, get, (· <$> ·)] )
(fun _ _ => rfl)
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ x : α, f x = x) (o) : map f o = o := by
rw [show f = id from funext H]; exact id_map o
@[simp]
theorem bind_some_right (x : Part α) : x.bind some = x := by
rw [bind_some_eq_map]
simp [map_id']
@[simp]
theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : (return a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : f <$> o = map f o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : f >>= g = f.bind g :=
rfl
theorem bind_le {α} (x : Part α) (f : α → Part β) (y : Part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· intro a h' b
have h := h b
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp] at h
apply h _ h'
· intro b h'
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨a, h₀, h₁⟩
apply h _ h₀ _ h₁
-- TODO: if `MonadFail` is defined, define the below instance.
-- instance : MonadFail Part :=
-- { Part.monad with fail := fun _ _ => none }
/-- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (H : p → o.Dom) : Part α :=
⟨p, fun h => o.get (H h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (h : p → o.Dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o := by
dsimp [restrict, mem_eq]; constructor
· rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
rintro ⟨h₀, _, h₂⟩; exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition. This function is unsound. -/
unsafe def unwrap (o : Part α) : α :=
o.get lcProof
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ h : p, (f h).Dom → (assert p f).Dom :=
Exists.intro
theorem bind_defined {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} :
∀ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom → (f.bind g).Dom :=
assert_defined
@[simp]
theorem bind_dom {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : (f.bind g).Dom ↔ ∃ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
section Instances
/-!
We define several instances for constants and operations on `Part α` inherited from `α`.
This section could be moved to a separate file to avoid the import of `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs`.
-/
@[to_additive]
instance [One α] : One (Part α) where one := pure 1
@[to_additive]
instance [Mul α] : Mul (Part α) where mul a b := (· * ·) <$> a <*> b
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] : Inv (Part α) where inv := map Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
instance [Div α] : Div (Part α) where div a b := (· / ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Mod α] : Mod (Part α) where mod a b := (· % ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Append α] : Append (Part α) where append a b := (· ++ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Inter α] : Inter (Part α) where inter a b := (· ∩ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Union α] : Union (Part α) where union a b := (· ∪ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [SDiff α] : SDiff (Part α) where sdiff a b := (· \ ·) <$> a <*> b
section
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_def [Mul α] (a b : Part α) : a * b = bind a fun y ↦ map (y * ·) b := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem one_def [One α] : (1 : Part α) = some 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_def [Inv α] (a : Part α) : a⁻¹ = Part.map (· ⁻¹) a := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_def [Div α] (a b : Part α) : a / b = bind a fun y => map (y / ·) b := rfl
theorem mod_def [Mod α] (a b : Part α) : a % b = bind a fun y => map (y % ·) b := rfl
theorem append_def [Append α] (a b : Part α) : a ++ b = bind a fun y => map (y ++ ·) b := rfl
theorem inter_def [Inter α] (a b : Part α) : a ∩ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∩ ·) b := rfl
theorem union_def [Union α] (a b : Part α) : a ∪ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∪ ·) b := rfl
theorem sdiff_def [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) : a \ b = bind a fun y => map (y \ ·) b := rfl
end
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one [One α] : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Part α) :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma * mb ∈ a * b := ⟨⟨ha.1, hb.1⟩, by simp only [← ha.2, ← hb.2]; rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_get_eq [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a * b)) :
(a * b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mul_dom hab) * b.get (right_dom_of_mul_dom hab) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem some_mul_some [Mul α] (a b : α) : some a * some b = some (a * b) := by simp [mul_def]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv [Inv α] (a : Part α) (ma : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) : ma⁻¹ ∈ a⁻¹ := by
simp [inv_def]; aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_some [Inv α] (a : α) : (some a)⁻¹ = some a⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div [Div α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma / mb ∈ a / b := by simp [div_def]; aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_get_eq [Div α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a / b)) :
(a / b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_div_dom hab) / b.get (right_dom_of_div_dom hab) := by
simp [div_def]; aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem some_div_some [Div α] (a b : α) : some a / some b = some (a / b) := by simp [div_def]
theorem mod_mem_mod [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma % mb ∈ a % b := by simp [mod_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem mod_get_eq [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a % b)) :
(a % b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mod_dom hab) % b.get (right_dom_of_mod_dom hab) := by
simp [mod_def]; aesop
theorem some_mod_some [Mod α] (a b : α) : some a % some b = some (a % b) := by simp [mod_def]
theorem append_mem_append [Append α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ++ mb ∈ a ++ b := by simp [append_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem append_get_eq [Append α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : (a ++ b).get hab =
a.get (left_dom_of_append_dom hab) ++ b.get (right_dom_of_append_dom hab) := by
simp [append_def]; aesop
theorem some_append_some [Append α] (a b : α) : some a ++ some b = some (a ++ b) := by
simp [append_def]
theorem inter_mem_inter [Inter α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ∩ mb ∈ a ∩ b := by simp [inter_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_inter_dom [Inter α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_inter_dom [Inter α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem inter_get_eq [Inter α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) :
(a ∩ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_inter_dom hab) ∩ b.get (right_dom_of_inter_dom hab) := by
simp [inter_def]; aesop
theorem some_inter_some [Inter α] (a b : α) : some a ∩ some b = some (a ∩ b) := by
simp [inter_def]
theorem union_mem_union [Union α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ∪ mb ∈ a ∪ b := by simp [union_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_union_dom [Union α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_union_dom [Union α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem union_get_eq [Union α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) :
(a ∪ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_union_dom hab) ∪ b.get (right_dom_of_union_dom hab) := by
simp [union_def]; aesop
theorem some_union_some [Union α] (a b : α) : some a ∪ some b = some (a ∪ b) := by simp [union_def]
theorem sdiff_mem_sdiff [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma \ mb ∈ a \ b := by simp [sdiff_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_sdiff_dom [SDiff α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a \ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_sdiff_dom [SDiff α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a \ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_get_eq [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a \ b)) :
(a \ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_sdiff_dom hab) \ b.get (right_dom_of_sdiff_dom hab) := by
simp [sdiff_def]; aesop
theorem some_sdiff_some [SDiff α] (a b : α) : some a \ some b = some (a \ b) := by simp [sdiff_def]
end Instances
end Part
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 860 | 860 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions
/-!
# Lemmas on fractions
Let `W : MorphismProperty C`, and objects `X` and `Y` in `C`. In this file,
we introduce structures like `W.LeftFraction₂ X Y` which consists of two
left fractions with the "same denominator" which shall be important in
the construction of the preadditive structure on the localized category
when `C` is preadditive and `W` has a left calculus of fractions.
When `W` has a left calculus of fractions, we generalize the lemmas
`RightFraction.exists_leftFraction` as `RightFraction₂.exists_leftFraction₂`,
`Localization.exists_leftFraction` as `Localization.exists_leftFraction₂` and
`Localization.exists_leftFraction₃`, and
`LeftFraction.map_eq_iff` as `LeftFraction₂.map_eq_iff`.
## Implementation note
The lemmas in this file are phrased with data that is bundled into structures like
`LeftFraction₂` or `LeftFraction₃`. It could have been possible to phrase them
with "unbundled data". However, this would require introducing 4 or 5 variables instead
of one. It is also very convenient to use dot notation.
Many definitions have been made reducible so as to ease rewrites when this API is used.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (L : C ⥤ D) (W : MorphismProperty C)
[L.IsLocalization W]
namespace MorphismProperty
/-- This structure contains the data of two left fractions for
`W : MorphismProperty C` that have the same "denominator". -/
structure LeftFraction₂ (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of left fractions -/
{Y' : C}
/-- the numerator of the first left fraction -/
f : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the numerator of the second left fraction -/
f' : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the denominator of the left fractions -/
s : Y ⟶ Y'
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
/-- This structure contains the data of three left fractions for
`W : MorphismProperty C` that have the same "denominator". -/
structure LeftFraction₃ (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of left fractions -/
{Y' : C}
/-- the numerator of the first left fraction -/
f : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the numerator of the second left fraction -/
f' : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the numerator of the third left fraction -/
f'' : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the denominator of the left fractions -/
s : Y ⟶ Y'
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
/-- This structure contains the data of two right fractions for
`W : MorphismProperty C` that have the same "denominator". -/
structure RightFraction₂ (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of right fractions -/
{X' : C}
/-- the denominator of the right fractions -/
s : X' ⟶ X
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
/-- the numerator of the first right fraction -/
f : X' ⟶ Y
/-- the numerator of the second right fraction -/
f' : X' ⟶ Y
variable {W}
/-- The equivalence relation on tuples of left fractions with the same denominator
for a morphism property `W`. The fact it is an equivalence relation is not
formalized, but it would follow easily from `LeftFraction₂.map_eq_iff`. -/
def LeftFraction₂Rel {X Y : C} (z₁ z₂ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y) : Prop :=
∃ (Z : C) (t₁ : z₁.Y' ⟶ Z) (t₂ : z₂.Y' ⟶ Z) (_ : z₁.s ≫ t₁ = z₂.s ≫ t₂)
(_ : z₁.f ≫ t₁ = z₂.f ≫ t₂) (_ : z₁.f' ≫ t₁ = z₂.f' ≫ t₂), W (z₁.s ≫ t₁)
namespace LeftFraction₂
variable {X Y : C} (φ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y)
/-- The first left fraction. -/
abbrev fst : W.LeftFraction X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- The second left fraction. -/
abbrev snd : W.LeftFraction X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f'
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- The exchange of the two fractions. -/
abbrev symm : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f'
f' := φ.f
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
end LeftFraction₂
namespace LeftFraction₃
variable {X Y : C} (φ : W.LeftFraction₃ X Y)
/-- The first left fraction. -/
abbrev fst : W.LeftFraction X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- The second left fraction. -/
abbrev snd : W.LeftFraction X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f'
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- The third left fraction. -/
abbrev thd : W.LeftFraction X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f''
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- Forgets the first fraction. -/
abbrev forgetFst : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f'
f' := φ.f''
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- Forgets the second fraction. -/
abbrev forgetSnd : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f
f' := φ.f''
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- Forgets the third fraction. -/
abbrev forgetThd : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y where
Y' := φ.Y'
f := φ.f
f' := φ.f'
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
end LeftFraction₃
namespace LeftFraction₂Rel
variable {X Y : C} {z₁ z₂ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y}
lemma fst (h : LeftFraction₂Rel z₁ z₂) : LeftFractionRel z₁.fst z₂.fst := by
obtain ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, _, ht⟩ := h
exact ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩
lemma snd (h : LeftFraction₂Rel z₁ z₂) : LeftFractionRel z₁.snd z₂.snd := by
obtain ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, _, hft', ht⟩ := h
exact ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft', ht⟩
end LeftFraction₂Rel
namespace LeftFraction₂
variable (W)
variable [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions]
lemma map_eq_iff {X Y : C} (φ ψ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y) :
(φ.fst.map L (Localization.inverts _ _) = ψ.fst.map L (Localization.inverts _ _) ∧
φ.snd.map L (Localization.inverts _ _) = ψ.snd.map L (Localization.inverts _ _)) ↔
LeftFraction₂Rel φ ψ := by
simp only [LeftFraction.map_eq_iff L W]
constructor
· intro ⟨h, h'⟩
obtain ⟨Z, t₁, t₂, hst, hft, ht⟩ := h
obtain ⟨Z', t₁', t₂', hst', hft', ht'⟩ := h'
dsimp at t₁ t₂ t₁' t₂' hst hft hst' hft' ht ht'
have ⟨α, hα⟩ := (RightFraction.mk _ ht (φ.s ≫ t₁')).exists_leftFraction
simp only [Category.assoc] at hα
obtain ⟨Z'', u, hu, fac⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ φ.hs hα
have hα' : ψ.s ≫ t₂ ≫ α.f ≫ u = ψ.s ≫ t₂' ≫ α.s ≫ u := by
rw [← reassoc_of% hst, ← reassoc_of% hα, ← reassoc_of% hst']
obtain ⟨Z''', u', hu', fac'⟩ := HasLeftCalculusOfFractions.ext _ _ _ ψ.hs hα'
simp only [Category.assoc] at fac fac'
refine ⟨Z''', t₁' ≫ α.s ≫ u ≫ u', t₂' ≫ α.s ≫ u ≫ u', ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [reassoc_of% hst']
· rw [reassoc_of% fac, reassoc_of% hft, fac']
· rw [reassoc_of% hft']
· rw [← Category.assoc]
exact W.comp_mem _ _ ht' (W.comp_mem _ _ α.hs (W.comp_mem _ _ hu hu'))
· intro h
exact ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩
end LeftFraction₂
namespace RightFraction₂
variable {X Y : C}
variable (φ : W.RightFraction₂ X Y)
/-- The first right fraction. -/
abbrev fst : W.RightFraction X Y where
X' := φ.X'
f := φ.f
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
/-- The second right fraction. -/
abbrev snd : W.RightFraction X Y where
X' := φ.X'
f := φ.f'
s := φ.s
hs := φ.hs
lemma exists_leftFraction₂ [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] :
∃ (ψ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y), φ.f ≫ ψ.s = φ.s ≫ ψ.f ∧
φ.f' ≫ ψ.s = φ.s ≫ ψ.f' := by
obtain ⟨ψ₁, hψ₁⟩ := φ.fst.exists_leftFraction
obtain ⟨ψ₂, hψ₂⟩ := φ.snd.exists_leftFraction
obtain ⟨α, hα⟩ := (RightFraction.mk _ ψ₁.hs ψ₂.s).exists_leftFraction
dsimp at hψ₁ hψ₂ hα
refine ⟨LeftFraction₂.mk (ψ₁.f ≫ α.f) (ψ₂.f ≫ α.s) (ψ₂.s ≫ α.s)
(W.comp_mem _ _ ψ₂.hs α.hs), ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp
rw [hα, reassoc_of% hψ₁]
· rw [reassoc_of% hψ₂]
end RightFraction₂
end MorphismProperty
namespace Localization
variable [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions]
open MorphismProperty
| lemma exists_leftFraction₂ {X Y : C} (f f' : L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y) :
∃ (φ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y), f = φ.fst.map L (inverts L W) ∧
f' = φ.snd.map L (inverts L W) := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := exists_leftFraction L W f
have ⟨φ', hφ'⟩ := exists_leftFraction L W f'
obtain ⟨α, hα⟩ := (RightFraction.mk _ φ.hs φ'.s).exists_leftFraction
let ψ : W.LeftFraction₂ X Y :=
{ Y' := α.Y'
f := φ.f ≫ α.f
f' := φ'.f ≫ α.s
s := φ'.s ≫ α.s
hs := W.comp_mem _ _ φ'.hs α.hs }
have := inverts L W _ φ'.hs
have := inverts L W _ α.hs
have : IsIso (L.map (φ'.s ≫ α.s)) := by
rw [L.map_comp]
infer_instance
refine ⟨ψ, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← cancel_mono (L.map (φ'.s ≫ α.s)), LeftFraction.map_comp_map_s,
hα, L.map_comp, hφ, LeftFraction.map_comp_map_s_assoc,
L.map_comp]
· rw [← cancel_mono (L.map (φ'.s ≫ α.s)), hφ']
nth_rw 1 [L.map_comp]
rw [LeftFraction.map_comp_map_s_assoc, LeftFraction.map_comp_map_s,
L.map_comp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/CalculusOfFractions/Fractions.lean | 261 | 285 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Neighborhoods
/-!
# Neighborhoods of a set
In this file we define the filter `𝓝ˢ s` or `nhdsSet s` consisting of all neighborhoods of a set
`s`.
## Main Properties
There are a couple different notions equivalent to `s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t`:
* `s ⊆ interior t` using `subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet`
* `∀ x : X, x ∈ t → s ∈ 𝓝 x` using `mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall`
* `∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s` using `mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists`
Furthermore, we have the following results:
* `monotone_nhdsSet`: `𝓝ˢ` is monotone
* In T₁-spaces, `𝓝ˢ`is strictly monotone and hence injective:
`strict_mono_nhdsSet`/`injective_nhdsSet`. These results are in `Mathlib.Topology.Separation`.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Filter X}
{s t s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set X} {x : X}
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal (X) [TopologicalSpace (X × X)] :
𝓝ˢ (diagonal X) = ⨆ (x : X), 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhdsSet, ← range_diag, ← range_comp]
rfl
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∀ x : X, x ∈ t → s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [nhdsSet, Filter.mem_sSup, forall_mem_image]
| lemma nhdsSet_le : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ f ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ f := by simp [nhdsSet]
| Mathlib/Topology/NhdsSet.lean | 41 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) :=
monotone_image.strictMono_of_injective inj.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
alias ⟨Injective.existsUnique_of_mem_range, _⟩ := Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx]
theorem LeftInverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s := by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
theorem LeftInverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
protected theorem Involutive.preimage {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) : Involutive (preimage f) :=
hf.rightInverse.preimage_preimage
end Function
namespace EquivLike
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} {E : Type*} [EquivLike E ι ι']
@[simp] lemma range_comp {α : Type*} (f : ι' → α) (e : E) : range (f ∘ e) = range f :=
(EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _
end EquivLike
/-! ### Image and preimage on subtypes -/
namespace Subtype
variable {α : Type*}
theorem coe_image {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} :
(↑) '' s = { x | ∃ h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun a =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩ => h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩, fun ⟨ha, in_s⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : (↑) '' { x : ↥s | ↑x ∈ t } = t := by
ext x
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', hx⟩ => hx ▸ hx', fun hx => ⟨⟨x, h hx⟩, hx, rfl⟩⟩
theorem range_coe {s : Set α} : range ((↑) : s → α) = s := by
rw [← image_univ]
simp [-image_univ, coe_image]
/-- A variant of `range_coe`. Try to use `range_coe` if possible.
This version is useful when defining a new type that is defined as the subtype of something.
In that case, the coercion doesn't fire anymore. -/
theorem range_val {s : Set α} : range (Subtype.val : s → α) = s :=
range_coe
/-- We make this the simp lemma instead of `range_coe`. The reason is that if we write
for `s : Set α` the function `(↑) : s → α`, then the inferred implicit arguments of `(↑)` are
`↑α (fun x ↦ x ∈ s)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range ((↑) : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_self (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' s = univ := by
rw [← preimage_range, range_coe]
theorem range_val_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
theorem coe_image_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set s) : ((↑) : s → α) '' t ⊆ s :=
fun x ⟨y, _, yvaleq⟩ => by
rw [← yvaleq]; exact y.property
theorem coe_image_univ (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' Set.univ = s :=
image_univ.trans range_coe
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_coe (s t : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_eq_range_inter.trans <| congr_arg (· ∩ t) range_coe
theorem image_preimage_val (s t : Set α) : (Subtype.val : s → α) '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_coe s t
theorem preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff {s t u : Set α} :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe, coe_injective.image_injective.eq_iff]
theorem preimage_coe_self_inter (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, ← inter_assoc, inter_self]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_inter_self (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (t ∩ s) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_coe_self_inter]
theorem preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val : s → α) ⁻¹' t = Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff
lemma preimage_val_subset_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val ⁻¹' t : Set s) ⊆ Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u := by
constructor
· rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe]
exact image_subset _
· intro h x a
exact (h ⟨x.2, a⟩).2
theorem exists_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∃ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∃ s : Set α, s ⊆ t ∧ p s := by
rw [← exists_subset_range_and_iff, range_coe]
theorem forall_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∀ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s ⊆ t → p s := by
rw [← forall_subset_range_iff, range_coe]
theorem preimage_coe_nonempty {s t : Set α} :
(((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, image_nonempty]
theorem preimage_coe_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ∅ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, preimage_coe_nonempty]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_compl (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' sᶜ = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (inter_compl_self s)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_compl' (s : Set α) :
(fun x : (sᶜ : Set α) => (x : α)) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (compl_inter_self s)
end Subtype
/-! ### Images and preimages on `Option` -/
open Set
namespace Option
theorem injective_iff {α β} {f : Option α → β} :
Injective f ↔ Injective (f ∘ some) ∧ f none ∉ range (f ∘ some) := by
simp only [mem_range, not_exists, (· ∘ ·)]
refine
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.comp (Option.some_injective _), fun x => hf.ne <| Option.some_ne_none _⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h_some, h_none⟩ (_ | a) (_ | b) hab
exacts [rfl, (h_none _ hab.symm).elim, (h_none _ hab).elim, congr_arg some (h_some hab)]
theorem range_eq {α β} (f : Option α → β) : range f = insert (f none) (range (f ∘ some)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => Option.exists.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
end Option
namespace Set
open Function
/-! ### Injectivity and surjectivity lemmas for image and preimage -/
section ImagePreimage
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
theorem image_surjective : Surjective (image f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h y => ?_, Surjective.image_surjective⟩
rcases h {y} with ⟨s, hs⟩
have := mem_singleton y; rw [← hs] at this; rcases this with ⟨x, _, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_injective : Injective (image f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x x' hx => ?_, Injective.image_injective⟩
rw [← singleton_eq_singleton_iff]; apply h
rw [image_singleton, image_singleton, hx]
theorem preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
f ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = f '' t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
theorem eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ f '' s = t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
end ImagePreimage
end Set
/-! ### Disjoint lemmas for image and preimage -/
section Disjoint
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem Disjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _ hx => h.le_bot hx
lemma Codisjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Codisjoint s t) :
Codisjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := by
simp only [codisjoint_iff_le_sup, Set.sup_eq_union, top_le_iff, ← Set.preimage_union] at h ⊢
rw [h]; rfl
lemma IsCompl.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : IsCompl s t) :
IsCompl (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
⟨h.1.preimage f, h.2.preimage f⟩
namespace Set
theorem disjoint_image_image {f : β → α} {g : γ → α} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, f b ≠ g c) : Disjoint (f '' s) (g '' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by rintro a ⟨⟨b, hb, eq⟩, c, hc, rfl⟩; exact h b hb c hc eq
theorem disjoint_image_of_injective (hf : Injective f) {s t : Set α} (hd : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
disjoint_image_image fun _ hx _ hy => hf.ne fun H => Set.disjoint_iff.1 hd ⟨hx, H.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem _root_.Disjoint.of_image (h : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t)) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _ hx =>
disjoint_left.1 h (mem_image_of_mem _ hx.1) (mem_image_of_mem _ hx.2)
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_image_iff (hf : Injective f) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨Disjoint.of_image, disjoint_image_of_injective hf⟩
theorem _root_.Disjoint.of_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s t : Set β}
(h : Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← image_preimage_eq (_ ∩ _) hf, preimage_inter, h.inter_eq,
image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_preimage_iff (hf : Surjective f) {s t : Set β} :
Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨Disjoint.of_preimage hf, Disjoint.preimage _⟩
theorem preimage_eq_empty {s : Set β} (h : Disjoint s (range f)) :
f ⁻¹' s = ∅ := by
simpa using h.preimage f
theorem preimage_eq_empty_iff {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' s = ∅ ↔ Disjoint s (range f) :=
⟨fun h => by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, not_exists, mem_inter_iff,
not_and, mem_range, mem_preimage] at h ⊢
intro y hy x hx
rw [← hx] at hy
exact h x hy,
preimage_eq_empty⟩
end Set
end Disjoint
section Sigma
variable {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {i j : α} {s : Set (β i)}
lemma sigma_mk_preimage_image' (h : i ≠ j) : Sigma.mk j ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk i '' s) = ∅ := by
simp [image, h]
lemma sigma_mk_preimage_image_eq_self : Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' (Sigma.mk i '' s) = s := by
simp [image]
end Sigma
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,463 | 1,464 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Defs
/-!
# Theory of topological modules
We use the class `ContinuousSMul` for topological (semi) modules and topological vector spaces.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Filter Pointwise
universe u v w u'
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem ContinuousSMul.of_nhds_zero [IsTopologicalRing R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
(hmul : Tendsto (fun p : R × M => p.1 • p.2) (𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulleft : ∀ m : M, Tendsto (fun a : R => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulright : ∀ a : R, Tendsto (fun m : M => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)) : ContinuousSMul R M where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← nhds_prod_eq] at hmul
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂ (AddMonoidHom.smul : R →+ M →+ M) ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simpa [ContinuousAt]
variable (R M) in
omit [TopologicalSpace R] in
/-- A topological module over a ring has continuous negation.
This cannot be an instance, because it would cause search for `[Module ?R M]` with unknown `R`. -/
theorem ContinuousNeg.of_continuousConstSMul [ContinuousConstSMul R M] : ContinuousNeg M where
continuous_neg := by simpa using continuous_const_smul (T := M) (-1 : R)
end
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [ContinuousAdd M] [Module R M] [ContinuousSMul R M]
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior.
This is the case, e.g., if `R` is a nontrivially normed field. -/
theorem Submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [NeBot (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0)]
(s : Submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s : Set M)).Nonempty) : s = ⊤ := by
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine Submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 fun x => ?_
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy
have : Tendsto (fun c : R => y + c • x) (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0) (𝓝 (y + (0 : R) • x)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul tendsto_const_nhds)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this
obtain ⟨_, hu : y + _ • _ ∈ s, u, rfl⟩ :=
nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem (Filter.mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhdsWithin)
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_mem_nhds hy
rwa [s.add_mem_iff_right hy', ← Units.smul_def, s.smul_mem_iff' u] at hu
variable (R M)
/-- Let `R` be a topological ring such that zero is not an isolated point (e.g., a nontrivially
normed field, see `NormedField.punctured_nhds_neBot`). Let `M` be a nontrivial module over `R`
such that `c • x = 0` implies `c = 0 ∨ x = 0`. Then `M` has no isolated points. We formulate this
using `NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)`.
This lemma is not an instance because Lean would need to find `[ContinuousSMul ?m_1 M]` with
unknown `?m_1`. We register this as an instance for `R = ℝ` in `Real.punctured_nhds_module_neBot`.
One can also use `haveI := Module.punctured_nhds_neBot R M` in a proof.
-/
theorem Module.punctured_nhds_neBot [Nontrivial M] [NeBot (𝓝[≠] (0 : R))] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(x : M) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
rcases exists_ne (0 : M) with ⟨y, hy⟩
suffices Tendsto (fun c : R => x + c • y) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝[≠] x) from this.neBot
refine Tendsto.inf ?_ (tendsto_principal_principal.2 <| ?_)
· convert tendsto_const_nhds.add ((@tendsto_id R _).smul_const y)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero]
· intro c hc
simpa [hy] using hc
end
section LatticeOps
variable {R M₁ M₂ : Type*} [SMul R M₁] [SMul R M₂] [u : TopologicalSpace R]
{t : TopologicalSpace M₂} [ContinuousSMul R M₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M₁ M₂] [MulActionHomClass F R M₁ M₂] (f : F)
theorem continuousSMul_induced : @ContinuousSMul R M₁ _ u (t.induced f) :=
let _ : TopologicalSpace M₁ := t.induced f
IsInducing.continuousSMul ⟨rfl⟩ continuous_id (map_smul f _ _)
end LatticeOps
/-- The span of a separable subset with respect to a separable scalar ring is again separable. -/
lemma TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.span {R M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring R] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace R] [SeparableSpace R]
[ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousSMul R M] {s : Set M} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
IsSeparable (Submodule.span R s : Set M) := by
rw [Submodule.span_eq_iUnion_nat]
refine .iUnion fun n ↦ .image ?_ ?_
· have : IsSeparable {f : Fin n → R × M | ∀ (i : Fin n), f i ∈ Set.univ ×ˢ s} := by
apply isSeparable_pi (fun i ↦ .prod (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hs)
rwa [Set.univ_prod] at this
· apply continuous_finset_sum _ (fun i _ ↦ ?_)
exact (continuous_fst.comp (continuous_apply i)).smul (continuous_snd.comp (continuous_apply i))
namespace Submodule
instance topologicalAddGroup {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] (S : Submodule R M) : IsTopologicalAddGroup S :=
inferInstanceAs (IsTopologicalAddGroup S.toAddSubgroup)
end Submodule
section closure
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[ContinuousConstSMul R M]
theorem Submodule.mapsTo_smul_closure (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (closure s : Set M) (closure s) :=
have : Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (s : Set M) s := fun _ h ↦ s.smul_mem c h
this.closure (continuous_const_smul c)
theorem Submodule.smul_closure_subset (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
c • closure (s : Set M) ⊆ closure (s : Set M) :=
(s.mapsTo_smul_closure c).image_subset
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a submodule of a topological `R`-module `M` is itself
a submodule. -/
def Submodule.topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M :=
{ s.toAddSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
smul_mem' := s.mapsTo_smul_closure }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe (s : Submodule R M) :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set M) = closure (s : Set M) :=
rfl
theorem Submodule.le_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
subset_closure
theorem Submodule.closure_subset_topologicalClosure_span (s : Set M) :
closure s ⊆ (span R s).topologicalClosure := by
rw [Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe]
exact closure_mono subset_span
theorem Submodule.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set M) := isClosed_closure
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Submodule R M) {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set M)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono {s : Submodule R M} {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t) :
s.topologicalClosure ≤ t.topologicalClosure :=
closure_mono h
/-- The topological closure of a closed submodule `s` is equal to `s`. -/
theorem IsClosed.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq {s : Submodule R M} (hs : IsClosed (s : Set M)) :
s.topologicalClosure = s :=
SetLike.ext' hs.closure_eq
/-- A subspace is dense iff its topological closure is the entire space. -/
theorem Submodule.dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top {s : Submodule R M} :
Dense (s : Set M) ↔ s.topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq, dense_iff_closure_eq]
simp
instance Submodule.topologicalClosure.completeSpace {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
[UniformSpace M'] [ContinuousAdd M'] [ContinuousConstSMul R M'] [CompleteSpace M']
(U : Submodule R M') : CompleteSpace U.topologicalClosure :=
isClosed_closure.completeSpace_coe
/-- A maximal proper subspace of a topological module (i.e a `Submodule` satisfying `IsCoatom`)
is either closed or dense. -/
theorem Submodule.isClosed_or_dense_of_isCoatom (s : Submodule R M) (hs : IsCoatom s) :
IsClosed (s : Set M) ∨ Dense (s : Set M) := by
refine (hs.le_iff.mp s.le_topologicalClosure).symm.imp ?_ dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top.mpr
exact fun h ↦ h ▸ isClosed_closure
end closure
namespace Submodule
variable {ι R : Type*} {M : ι → Type*} [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well. -/
theorem closure_coe_iSup_map_single (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
closure (↑(⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) : Set (∀ i, M i)) =
Set.univ.pi fun i ↦ closure (s i) := by
rw [← closure_pi_set]
refine (closure_mono ?_).antisymm <| closure_minimal ?_ isClosed_closure
· exact SetLike.coe_mono <| iSup_map_single_le
· simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_closure_iff]
intro x hx U hU hxU
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.mp hU x hxU with ⟨t, V, hV, hVU⟩
refine ⟨∑ i ∈ t, Pi.single i (x i), hVU ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_all [Finset.sum_pi_single]
· exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| mem_map_of_mem <| hx _ <| Set.mem_univ _
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well.
This version is stated in terms of `Submodule.topologicalClosure`,
thus assumes that `M i`s are topological modules over `R`.
However, the statement is true without assuming continuity of the operations,
see `Submodule.closure_coe_iSup_map_single` above. -/
theorem topologicalClosure_iSup_map_single [∀ i, ContinuousAdd (M i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousConstSMul R (M i)] (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
topologicalClosure (⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) =
pi Set.univ fun i ↦ (s i).topologicalClosure :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| closure_coe_iSup_map_single _
end Submodule
section Pi
theorem LinearMap.continuous_on_pi {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Finite ι] [Semiring R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousAdd M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) : Continuous f := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
-- for the proof, write `f` in the standard basis, and use that each coordinate is a continuous
-- function.
have : (f : (ι → R) → M) = fun x => ∑ i : ι, x i • f fun j => if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
ext x
exact f.pi_apply_eq_sum_univ x
rw [this]
refine continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
exact (continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const
end Pi
section PointwiseLimits
variable {M₁ M₂ α R S : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M₂] [T2Space M₂] [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module S M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul S M₂]
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂] {σ : R →+* S} {l : Filter α}
/-- Constructs a bundled linear map from a function and a proof that this function belongs to the
closure of the set of linear maps. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe (f : M₁ → M₂)
(hf : f ∈ closure (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂))) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
{ addMonoidHomOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf with
map_smul' := (isClosed_setOf_map_smul M₁ M₂ σ).closure_subset_iff.2
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ) hf }
/-- Construct a bundled linear map from a pointwise limit of linear maps -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfTendsto (f : M₁ → M₂) (g : α → M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) [l.NeBot]
(h : Tendsto (fun a x => g a x) l (𝓝 f)) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f <|
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_range_self _
variable (M₁ M₂ σ)
theorem LinearMap.isClosed_range_coe : IsClosed (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂)) :=
isClosed_of_closure_subset fun f hf => ⟨linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf, rfl⟩
end PointwiseLimits
section Quotient
namespace Submodule
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M]
(S : Submodule R M)
instance _root_.QuotientModule.Quotient.topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.quotientRel))
theorem isOpenMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenMap_coe
theorem isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenQuotientMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk
instance topologicalAddGroup_quotient [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] : IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S.toAddSubgroup)
instance continuousSMul_quotient [TopologicalSpace R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] : ContinuousSMul R (M ⧸ S) where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← (IsOpenQuotientMap.id.prodMap S.isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ).continuous_comp_iff]
exact continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_smul
instance t3_quotient_of_isClosed [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] [IsClosed (S : Set M)] :
T3Space (M ⧸ S) :=
letI : IsClosed (S.toAddSubgroup : Set M) := ‹_›
QuotientAddGroup.instT3Space S.toAddSubgroup
end Submodule
end Quotient
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Basic.lean | 1,203 | 1,206 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/Adjunctions.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
open scoped List
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
rcases h with - | ⟨L₁, L₂⟩
simp [List.nil_eq_append_iff] at h'
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩ <;> simp_all
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp +contextual [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; simpa using ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
@[to_additive
"**Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma."]
theorem church_rosser : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₃ → Join Red L₂ L₃ :=
Relation.church_rosser fun _ b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, hcd.to_red⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons {p} : Red L₁ L₂ → Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) :=
ReflTransGen.lift (List.cons p) fun _ _ => Step.cons
@[to_additive]
theorem cons_cons_iff (p) : Red (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq₁ : (p :: L₁ : List _) = LL₁
generalize eq₂ : (p :: L₂ : List _) = LL₂
intro h
induction h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on generalizing L₁ L₂ with
| refl =>
subst_vars
cases eq₂
constructor
| head h₁₂ h ih =>
subst_vars
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := p
rw [Step.cons_left_iff] at h₁₂
rcases h₁₂ with (⟨L, h₁₂, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact (ih rfl rfl).head h₁₂
· exact (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not_rev)
cons_cons
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append_left_iff : ∀ L, Red (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| p :: L => by simp [append_append_left_iff L, cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem append_append (h₁ : Red L₁ L₃) (h₂ : Red L₂ L₄) : Red (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₃ ++ L₄) :=
(h₁.lift (fun L => L ++ L₂) fun _ _ => Step.append_right).trans ((append_append_left_iff _).2 h₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem to_append_iff : Red L (L₁ ++ L₂) ↔ ∃ L₃ L₄, L = L₃ ++ L₄ ∧ Red L₃ L₁ ∧ Red L₄ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(by
generalize eq : L₁ ++ L₂ = L₁₂
intro h
induction h generalizing L₁ L₂ with
| refl => exact ⟨_, _, eq.symm, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| tail hLL' h ih =>
obtain @⟨s, e, a, b⟩ := h
rcases List.append_eq_append_iff.1 eq with (⟨s', rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨e', rfl, rfl⟩)
· have : L₁ ++ (s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e) = L₁ ++ s' ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂.tail Step.not⟩
· have : s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: e' ++ L₂ = s ++ (a, b) :: (a, not b) :: (e' ++ L₂) :=
by simp
rcases ih this with ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨w₁, w₂, rfl, h₁.tail Step.not, h₂⟩)
fun ⟨_, _, Eq, h₃, h₄⟩ => Eq.symm ▸ append_append h₃ h₄
/-- The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "The empty word `[]` only reduces to itself."]
theorem nil_iff : Red [] L ↔ L = [] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => Red.not_step_nil
/-- A letter only reduces to itself. -/
@[to_additive "A letter only reduces to itself."]
theorem singleton_iff {x} : Red [x] L₁ ↔ L₁ = [x] :=
reflTransGen_iff_eq fun _ => not_step_singleton
/-- If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `xw` reduces to the empty word, then `w` reduces
to `x⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive
"If `x` is a letter and `w` is a word such that `x + w` reduces to the empty word, then `w`
reduces to `-x`."]
theorem cons_nil_iff_singleton {x b} : Red ((x, b) :: L) [] ↔ Red L [(x, not b)] :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
have h₁ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) [(x, not b)] := cons_cons h
have h₂ : Red ((x, not b) :: (x, b) :: L) L := ReflTransGen.single Step.cons_not_rev
let ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩ := church_rosser h₁ h₂
rw [singleton_iff] at h₁
subst L'
assumption)
fun h => (cons_cons h).tail Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
theorem red_iff_irreducible {x1 b1 x2 b2} (h : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2)) :
Red [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] L ↔ L = [(x1, !b1), (x2, b2)] := by
apply reflTransGen_iff_eq
generalize eq : [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] = L'
intro L h'
cases h'
simp only [List.cons_eq_append_iff, List.cons.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq, and_false,
List.nil_eq_append_iff, exists_const, or_self, or_false, List.cons_ne_nil] at eq
rcases eq with ⟨rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp at h
/-- If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `xw₁` reduces to `yw₂`, then
`w₁` reduces to `x⁻¹yw₂`. -/
@[to_additive "If `x` and `y` are distinct letters and `w₁ w₂` are words such that `x + w₁` reduces
to `y + w₂`, then `w₁` reduces to `-x + y + w₂`."]
theorem inv_of_red_of_ne {x1 b1 x2 b2} (H1 : (x1, b1) ≠ (x2, b2))
(H2 : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ((x2, b2) :: L₂)) : Red L₁ ((x1, not b1) :: (x2, b2) :: L₂) := by
have : Red ((x1, b1) :: L₁) ([(x2, b2)] ++ L₂) := H2
rcases to_append_iff.1 this with ⟨_ | ⟨p, L₃⟩, L₄, eq, h₁, h₂⟩
· simp [nil_iff] at h₁
· cases eq
show Red (L₃ ++ L₄) ([(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] ++ L₂)
apply append_append _ h₂
have h₁ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) [(x1, not b1), (x2, b2)] := cons_cons h₁
have h₂ : Red ((x1, not b1) :: (x1, b1) :: L₃) L₃ := Step.cons_not_rev.to_red
rcases church_rosser h₁ h₂ with ⟨L', h₁, h₂⟩
rw [red_iff_irreducible H1] at h₁
rwa [h₁] at h₂
open List -- for <+ notation
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.sublist (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : L₂ <+ L₁ := by
cases H; simp
/-- If `w₁ w₂` are words such that `w₁` reduces to `w₂`, then `w₂` is a sublist of `w₁`. -/
@[to_additive "If `w₁ w₂` are words such that `w₁` reduces to `w₂`, then `w₂` is a sublist of
`w₁`."]
protected theorem sublist : Red L₁ L₂ → L₂ <+ L₁ :=
@reflTransGen_of_transitive_reflexive
_ (fun a b => b <+ a) _ _ _
(fun l => List.Sublist.refl l)
(fun _a _b _c hab hbc => List.Sublist.trans hbc hab)
(fun _ _ => Red.Step.sublist)
@[to_additive]
theorem length_le (h : Red L₁ L₂) : L₂.length ≤ L₁.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
@[to_additive]
theorem sizeof_of_step : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)},
Step L₁ L₂ → sizeOf L₂ < sizeOf L₁
| _, _, @Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by
induction L1 with
| nil =>
dsimp
omega
| cons hd tl ih =>
dsimp
exact Nat.add_lt_add_left ih _
@[to_additive]
theorem length (h : Red L₁ L₂) : ∃ n, L₁.length = L₂.length + 2 * n := by
induction h with
| refl => exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
| tail _h₁₂ h₂₃ ih =>
rcases ih with ⟨n, eq⟩
exists 1 + n
simp [Nat.mul_add, eq, (Step.length h₂₃).symm, add_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem antisymm (h₁₂ : Red L₁ L₂) (h₂₁ : Red L₂ L₁) : L₁ = L₂ :=
h₂₁.sublist.antisymm h₁₂.sublist
end Red
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.equivalence_join_red]
theorem equivalence_join_red : Equivalence (Join (@Red α)) :=
equivalence_join_reflTransGen fun _ b c hab hac =>
match b, c, Red.Step.diamond hab hac rfl with
| b, _, Or.inl rfl => ⟨b, by rfl, by rfl⟩
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨d, hbd, hcd⟩ => ⟨d, ReflGen.single hbd, ReflTransGen.single hcd⟩
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.join_red_of_step]
theorem join_red_of_step (h : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
join_of_single reflexive_reflTransGen h.to_red
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.eqvGen_step_iff_join_red]
theorem eqvGen_step_iff_join_red : EqvGen Red.Step L₁ L₂ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
have : EqvGen (Join Red) L₁ L₂ := h.mono fun _ _ => join_red_of_step
equivalence_join_red.eqvGen_iff.1 this)
(join_of_equivalence (Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _) fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_equivalence (Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _) EqvGen.rel)
end FreeGroup
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeGroup α` is the free group generated by `α`.
This is a group equipped with a function `FreeGroup.of : α → FreeGroup α` which has
the following universal property: if `G` is any group, and `f : α → G` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeGroup.lift f : FreeGroup α →* G`.
A typical element of `FreeGroup α` is a formal product of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses, quotient by reduction.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x⁻¹ * y * y * x * y⁻¹` is a
"typical" element of `FreeGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeGroup α` is isomorphic to `Multiplicative ℤ`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeGroup α` is not commutative.
-/
@[to_additive
"
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAddGroup α` is the free additive group generated by `α`.
This is a group equipped with a function `FreeAddGroup.of : α → FreeAddGroup α` which has
the following universal property: if `G` is any group, and `f : α → G` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeAddGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeAddGroup.lift f : FreeAddGroup α →+ G`.
A typical element of `FreeAddGroup α` is a formal sum of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses, quotient by reduction.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `-x + y + y + x + -y` is a
\"typical\" element of `FreeAddGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAddGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeAddGroup α` is isomorphic to `ℤ`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeAddGroup α` is not commutative.
"]
def FreeGroup (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quot <| @FreeGroup.Red.Step α
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- The canonical map from `List (α × Bool)` to the free group on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from `List (α × Bool)` to the free additive group on `α`."]
def mk (L : List (α × Bool)) : FreeGroup α :=
Quot.mk Red.Step L
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk : Quot.mk Red.Step L = mk L :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_lift_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → β)
(H : ∀ L₁ L₂, Red.Step L₁ L₂ → f L₁ = f L₂) : Quot.lift f H (mk L) = f L :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_liftOn_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → β)
(H : ∀ L₁ L₂, Red.Step L₁ L₂ → f L₁ = f L₂) : Quot.liftOn (mk L) f H = f L :=
rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem quot_map_mk (β : Type v) (f : List (α × Bool) → List (β × Bool))
(H : (Red.Step ⇒ Red.Step) f f) : Quot.map f H (mk L) = mk (f L) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : One (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨mk []⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem one_eq_mk : (1 : FreeGroup α) = mk [] :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (FreeGroup α) := by unfold FreeGroup; infer_instance
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨fun x y =>
Quot.liftOn x
(fun L₁ =>
Quot.liftOn y (fun L₂ => mk <| L₁ ++ L₂) fun _L₂ _L₃ H =>
Quot.sound <| Red.Step.append_left H)
fun _L₁ _L₂ H => Quot.inductionOn y fun _L₃ => Quot.sound <| Red.Step.append_right H⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_mk : mk L₁ * mk L₂ = mk (L₁ ++ L₂) :=
rfl
/-- Transform a word representing a free group element into a word representing its inverse. -/
@[to_additive "Transform a word representing a free group element into a word representing its
negative."]
def invRev (w : List (α × Bool)) : List (α × Bool) :=
(List.map (fun g : α × Bool => (g.1, not g.2)) w).reverse
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_length : (invRev L₁).length = L₁.length := by simp [invRev]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_invRev : invRev (invRev L₁) = L₁ := by
simp [invRev, List.map_reverse, Function.comp_def]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_empty : invRev ([] : List (α × Bool)) = [] :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem invRev_append : invRev (L₁ ++ L₂) = invRev L₂ ++ invRev L₁ := by simp [invRev]
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_cons {a : (α × Bool)} : invRev (a :: L) = invRev L ++ invRev [a] := by
simp [invRev]
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_involutive : Function.Involutive (@invRev α) := fun _ => invRev_invRev
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_injective : Function.Injective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.injective
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_surjective : Function.Surjective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem invRev_bijective : Function.Bijective (@invRev α) :=
invRev_involutive.bijective
@[to_additive]
instance : Inv (FreeGroup α) :=
⟨Quot.map invRev
(by
intro a b h
cases h
simp [invRev])⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mk : (mk L)⁻¹ = mk (invRev L) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.Step.invRev {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)} (h : Red.Step L₁ L₂) :
Red.Step (FreeGroup.invRev L₁) (FreeGroup.invRev L₂) := by
obtain ⟨a, b, x, y⟩ := h
simp [FreeGroup.invRev]
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.invRev {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)} (h : Red L₁ L₂) : Red (invRev L₁) (invRev L₂) :=
Relation.ReflTransGen.lift _ (fun _a _b => Red.Step.invRev) h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Red.step_invRev_iff :
Red.Step (FreeGroup.invRev L₁) (FreeGroup.invRev L₂) ↔ Red.Step L₁ L₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [invRev_invRev] using h.invRev, fun h => h.invRev⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem red_invRev_iff : Red (invRev L₁) (invRev L₂) ↔ Red L₁ L₂ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [invRev_invRev] using h.invRev, fun h => h.invRev⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Group (FreeGroup α) where
mul := (· * ·)
one := 1
inv := Inv.inv
mul_assoc := by rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩ ⟨L₃⟩; simp
one_mul := by rintro ⟨L⟩; rfl
mul_one := by rintro ⟨L⟩; simp [one_eq_mk]
inv_mul_cancel := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact
List.recOn L rfl fun ⟨x, b⟩ tl ih =>
Eq.trans (Quot.sound <| by simp [invRev, one_eq_mk]) ih
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pow_mk (n : ℕ) : mk L ^ n = mk (List.flatten <| List.replicate n L) :=
match n with
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_mk, mul_mk, List.replicate_succ, List.flatten_cons]
/-- `of` is the canonical injection from the type to the free group over that type by sending each
element to the equivalence class of the letter that is the element. -/
@[to_additive "`of` is the canonical injection from the type to the free group over that type
by sending each element to the equivalence class of the letter that is the element."]
def of (x : α) : FreeGroup α :=
mk [(x, true)]
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.exact : mk L₁ = mk L₂ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ :=
calc
mk L₁ = mk L₂ ↔ EqvGen Red.Step L₁ L₂ := Iff.intro Quot.eqvGen_exact Quot.eqvGen_sound
_ ↔ Join Red L₁ L₂ := eqvGen_step_iff_join_red
/-- The canonical map from the type to the free group is an injection. -/
@[to_additive "The canonical map from the type to the additive free group is an injection."]
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (@of α) := fun _ _ H => by
let ⟨L₁, hx, hy⟩ := Red.exact.1 H
simp [Red.singleton_iff] at hx hy; aesop
section lift
variable {β : Type v} [Group β] (f : α → β) {x y : FreeGroup α}
/-- Given `f : α → β` with `β` a group, the canonical map `List (α × Bool) → β` -/
@[to_additive "Given `f : α → β` with `β` an additive group, the canonical map
`List (α × Bool) → β`"]
def Lift.aux : List (α × Bool) → β := fun L =>
List.prod <| L.map fun x => cond x.2 (f x.1) (f x.1)⁻¹
@[to_additive]
theorem Red.Step.lift {f : α → β} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Lift.aux f L₁ = Lift.aux f L₂ := by
obtain @⟨_, _, _, b⟩ := H; cases b <;> simp [Lift.aux]
/-- If `β` is a group, then any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to a group homomorphism
from the free group over `α` to `β` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps symm_apply)
"If `β` is an additive group, then any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to an
additive group homomorphism from the free additive group over `α` to `β`"]
def lift : (α → β) ≃ (FreeGroup α →* β) where
toFun f :=
MonoidHom.mk' (Quot.lift (Lift.aux f) fun _ _ => Red.Step.lift) <| by
rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩; simp [Lift.aux]
invFun g := g ∘ of
left_inv f := List.prod_singleton
right_inv g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact List.recOn L
(g.map_one.symm)
(by
rintro ⟨x, _ | _⟩ t (ih : _ = g (mk t))
· show _ = g ((of x)⁻¹ * mk t)
simpa [Lift.aux] using ih
· show _ = g (of x * mk t)
simpa [Lift.aux] using ih)
variable {f}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift.mk : lift f (mk L) = List.prod (L.map fun x => cond x.2 (f x.1) (f x.1)⁻¹) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift.of {x} : lift f (of x) = f x :=
List.prod_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* β) (hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = f x) {x} :
g x = FreeGroup.lift f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_eq.mp (funext hg : g ∘ FreeGroup.of = f)) x
/-- Two homomorphisms out of a free group are equal if they are equal on generators.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two homomorphisms out of a free additive group are equal if they are
equal on generators. See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]."]
theorem ext_hom {G : Type*} [Group G] (f g : FreeGroup α →* G) (h : ∀ a, f (of a) = g (of a)) :
f = g :=
lift.symm.injective <| funext h
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_of_eq_id (α) : lift of = MonoidHom.id (FreeGroup α) :=
lift.apply_symm_apply (MonoidHom.id _)
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.of_eq (x : FreeGroup α) : lift FreeGroup.of x = x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_of_eq_id α) x
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.range_le {s : Subgroup β} (H : Set.range f ⊆ s) : (lift f).range ≤ s := by
rintro _ ⟨⟨L⟩, rfl⟩
exact List.recOn L s.one_mem fun ⟨x, b⟩ tl ih ↦
Bool.recOn b (by simpa using s.mul_mem (s.inv_mem <| H ⟨x, rfl⟩) ih)
(by simpa using s.mul_mem (H ⟨x, rfl⟩) ih)
@[to_additive]
theorem lift.range_eq_closure : (lift f).range = Subgroup.closure (Set.range f) := by
apply le_antisymm (lift.range_le Subgroup.subset_closure)
rw [Subgroup.closure_le]
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨FreeGroup.of a, by simp only [lift.of]⟩
/-- The generators of `FreeGroup α` generate `FreeGroup α`. That is, the subgroup closure of the
set of generators equals `⊤`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_range_of (α) :
Subgroup.closure (Set.range (FreeGroup.of : α → FreeGroup α)) = ⊤ := by
rw [← lift.range_eq_closure, lift_of_eq_id]
exact MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 Function.surjective_id
end lift
section Map
variable {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {x y : FreeGroup α}
/-- Any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to a group homomorphism from the free group over
`α` to the free group over `β`. -/
@[to_additive "Any function from `α` to `β` extends uniquely to an additive group homomorphism from
the additive free group over `α` to the additive free group over `β`."]
def map : FreeGroup α →* FreeGroup β :=
MonoidHom.mk'
(Quot.map (List.map fun x => (f x.1, x.2)) fun L₁ L₂ H => by cases H; simp)
(by rintro ⟨L₁⟩ ⟨L₂⟩; simp)
variable {f}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.mk : map f (mk L) = mk (L.map fun x => (f x.1, x.2)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.id (x : FreeGroup α) : map id x = x := by rcases x with ⟨L⟩; simp [List.map_id']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.id' (x : FreeGroup α) : map (fun z => z) x = x :=
map.id x
@[to_additive]
theorem map.comp {γ : Type w} (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x) :
map g (map f x) = map (g ∘ f) x := by
rcases x with ⟨L⟩; simp [Function.comp_def]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map.of {x} : map f (of x) = of (f x) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* FreeGroup β)
(hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = FreeGroup.of (f x)) :
∀ {x}, g x = map f x := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
exact List.recOn L g.map_one fun ⟨x, b⟩ t (ih : g (FreeGroup.mk t) = map f (FreeGroup.mk t)) =>
Bool.recOn b
(show g ((FreeGroup.of x)⁻¹ * FreeGroup.mk t) =
FreeGroup.map f ((FreeGroup.of x)⁻¹ * FreeGroup.mk t) by
simp [g.map_mul, g.map_inv, hg, ih])
(show g (FreeGroup.of x * FreeGroup.mk t) =
FreeGroup.map f (FreeGroup.of x * FreeGroup.mk t) by simp [g.map_mul, hg, ih])
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_lift : map f x = lift (of ∘ f) x :=
Eq.symm <| map.unique _ fun x => by simp
/-- Equivalent types give rise to multiplicatively equivalent free groups.
The converse can be found in `Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.GeneratorEquiv`, as
`Equiv.ofFreeGroupEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps apply)
"Equivalent types give rise to additively equivalent additive free groups."]
def freeGroupCongr {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : FreeGroup α ≃* FreeGroup β where
toFun := map e
invFun := map e.symm
left_inv x := by simp [Function.comp, map.comp]
right_inv x := by simp [Function.comp, map.comp]
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem freeGroupCongr_refl : freeGroupCongr (Equiv.refl α) = MulEquiv.refl _ :=
MulEquiv.ext map.id
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem freeGroupCongr_symm {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : (freeGroupCongr e).symm = freeGroupCongr e.symm :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem freeGroupCongr_trans {α β γ} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ) :
(freeGroupCongr e).trans (freeGroupCongr f) = freeGroupCongr (e.trans f) :=
MulEquiv.ext <| map.comp _ _
end Map
section Prod
variable [Group α] (x y : FreeGroup α)
/-- If `α` is a group, then any function from `α` to `α` extends uniquely to a homomorphism from the
free group over `α` to `α`. This is the multiplicative version of `FreeGroup.sum`. -/
@[to_additive "If `α` is an additive group, then any function from `α` to `α` extends uniquely to an
additive homomorphism from the additive free group over `α` to `α`."]
def prod : FreeGroup α →* α :=
lift id
variable {x y}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk : prod (mk L) = List.prod (L.map fun x => cond x.2 x.1 x.1⁻¹) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.of {x : α} : prod (of x) = x :=
lift.of
@[to_additive]
theorem prod.unique (g : FreeGroup α →* α) (hg : ∀ x, g (FreeGroup.of x) = x) {x} : g x = prod x :=
lift.unique g hg
end Prod
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_eq_prod_map {β : Type v} [Group β] {f : α → β} {x} : lift f x = prod (map f x) := by
rw [← lift.unique (prod.comp (map f)) (by simp), MonoidHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
section Sum
variable [AddGroup α] (x y : FreeGroup α)
/-- If `α` is a group, then any function from `α` to `α` extends uniquely to a homomorphism from the
free group over `α` to `α`. This is the additive version of `Prod`. -/
def sum : α :=
@prod (Multiplicative _) _ x
variable {x y}
@[simp]
theorem sum_mk : sum (mk L) = List.sum (L.map fun x => cond x.2 x.1 (-x.1)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum.of {x : α} : sum (of x) = x :=
@prod.of _ (_) _
-- note: there are no bundled homs with different notation in the domain and codomain, so we copy
-- these manually
@[simp]
theorem sum.map_mul : sum (x * y) = sum x + sum y :=
(@prod (Multiplicative _) _).map_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum.map_one : sum (1 : FreeGroup α) = 0 :=
(@prod (Multiplicative _) _).map_one
@[simp]
theorem sum.map_inv : sum x⁻¹ = -sum x :=
(prod : FreeGroup (Multiplicative α) →* Multiplicative α).map_inv _
end Sum
/-- The bijection between the free group on the empty type, and a type with one element. -/
@[to_additive "The bijection between the additive free group on the empty type, and a type with one
element."]
def freeGroupEmptyEquivUnit : FreeGroup Empty ≃ Unit where
toFun _ := ()
invFun _ := 1
left_inv := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨⟨⟨⟩, _⟩, _⟩⟩; rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟩ => rfl
/-- The bijection between the free group on a singleton, and the integers. -/
def freeGroupUnitEquivInt : FreeGroup Unit ≃ ℤ where
toFun x := sum (by
revert x
exact ↑(map fun _ => (1 : ℤ)))
invFun x := of () ^ x
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨L⟩
simp only [quot_mk_eq_mk, map.mk, sum_mk, List.map_map]
exact List.recOn L
(by rfl)
(fun ⟨⟨⟩, b⟩ tl ih => by
cases b <;> simp [zpow_add] at ih ⊢ <;> rw [ih] <;> rfl)
right_inv x :=
Int.induction_on x (by simp)
(fun i ih => by
simp only [zpow_natCast, map_pow, map.of] at ih
simp [zpow_add, ih])
(fun i ih => by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, map_inv, map_pow, map.of, sum.map_inv, neg_inj] at ih
simp [zpow_add, ih, sub_eq_add_neg])
section Category
variable {β : Type u}
@[to_additive]
instance : Monad FreeGroup.{u} where
pure {_α} := of
map {_α _β f} := map f
bind {_α _β x f} := lift f x
| @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator)]
protected theorem induction_on {C : FreeGroup α → Prop} (z : FreeGroup α) (C1 : C 1)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 857 | 858 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Nat
/-!
# Properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.Coprime`
Definitions are provided in batteries.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.Coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
Most of this file could be moved to batteries as well.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
namespace Nat
variable {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : ℕ}
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) : (a ^ c - 1) % (a ^ b - 1) = a ^ (c % b) - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with rfl | ha0
· simp [zero_pow_eq]; split_ifs <;> simp
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ha0 with rfl | ha1
· simp
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb0
· simp
rcases lt_or_le c b with h | h
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt h]
rwa [Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right (one_le_pow c a ha0), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right ha1]
· suffices a ^ (c - b + b) - 1 = a ^ (c - b) * (a ^ b - 1) + (a ^ (c - b) - 1) by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, add_mod_right, this, add_mod, mul_mod, mod_self,
mul_zero, zero_mod, zero_add, mod_mod, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (one_le_pow (c - b) a ha0), ← mul_add_one, pow_add,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_pow b a ha0)]
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) :
gcd (a ^ b - 1) (a ^ c - 1) = a ^ gcd b c - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb
· simp
replace hb : c % b < b := mod_lt c hb
rw [gcd_rec, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one, pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one, ← gcd_rec]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h,
← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
/-!
### `Coprime`
See also `Nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `Nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `Nat.Coprime m n`.
-/
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
| theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 96 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s` is defined as `⊓ (t : ℕ → Set α) (ht : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n), ∑' n, μ (t n) ⊓ ν (t n)`
rw [← sInf_pair, Measure.sInf_apply hs, OuterMeasure.sInf_apply
(image_nonempty.2 <| insert_nonempty μ {ν})]
refine le_antisymm (le_sInf fun m ⟨t, ht₁⟩ ↦ ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun t' ht' ↦ ?_)
· subst ht₁
-- We first show `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)` for any `t : Set α`
-- For this, define the sequence `t' : ℕ → Set α` where `t' 0 = t ∩ s`, `t' 1 = tᶜ ∩ s` and
-- `∅` otherwise. Then, we have by construction
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) ≤ μ (t' 0) + ν (t' 1) = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)`.
set t' : ℕ → Set α := fun n ↦ if n = 0 then t ∩ s else if n = 1 then tᶜ ∩ s else ∅ with ht'
refine (iInf₂_le t' fun x hx ↦ ?_).trans ?_
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
rw [tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 0, tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 1, if_neg zero_ne_one.symm,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_eq_zero_iff.2 _, add_zero]
· exact add_le_add (inf_le_left.trans <| by simp [ht']) (inf_le_right.trans <| by simp [ht'])
· simp only [ite_eq_left_iff]
intro n hn₁ hn₀
simp only [ht', if_neg hn₀, if_neg hn₁, measure_empty, iInf_pair, le_refl, inf_of_le_left]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
-- Conversely, fixing `t' : ℕ → Set α` such that `s ⊆ ⋃ n, t' n`, we construct `t : Set α`
-- for which `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)`.
-- Denoting `I := {n | μ (t' n) ≤ ν (t' n)}`, we set `t = ⋃ n ∈ I, t' n`.
-- Clearly `μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n)` and `ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`, so
-- `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n) + ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`
-- where the RHS equals `∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)` by the choice of `I`.
set t := ⋃ n ∈ {k : ℕ | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}, t' n with ht
suffices hadd : μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) by
exact le_trans (sInf_le ⟨t, rfl⟩) hadd
have hle₁ : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}), μ (t' n) :=
(measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans <| measure_biUnion_le _ (to_countable _) _
have hcap : tᶜ ∩ s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}, t' n := by
simp_rw [ht, compl_iUnion]
refine fun x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ↦ mem_iUnion₂.2 ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 <| ht' hx₂
refine ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
by_contra h
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at h
exact mem_iInter₂.1 hx₁ i h hi
have hle₂ : ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}), ν (t' n) :=
(measure_mono hcap).trans (measure_biUnion_le ν (to_countable {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}) _)
refine (add_le_add hle₁ hle₂).trans ?_
have heq : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)} ∪ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)} = univ := by
ext k; simp [le_or_lt]
conv in ∑' (n : ℕ), μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) => rw [← tsum_univ, ← heq]
rw [ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun n ↦ μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)) ?_ ENNReal.summable]
· refine add_le_add (tsum_congr ?_).le (tsum_congr ?_).le
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn; simpa
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hn
simp [le_of_lt hn]
· rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro k ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hk₁ hk₂
exact False.elim <| hk₂.not_le hk₁
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
lemma nonempty_of_neZero (μ : Measure α) [NeZero μ] : Nonempty α :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty α).resolve_left fun h ↦ by
simpa [eq_empty_of_isEmpty] using NeZero.ne (μ univ)
section Sum
variable {f : ι → Measure α}
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = {x₀}`. For any Dirac
mass `δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure
`sum δ_x` gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any
measurable set containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one gets
`sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero : sum f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
simp +contextual [Measure.ext_iff, forall_swap (α := ι)]
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact ENNReal.summable.tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_add ENNReal.summable]
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun _ ht _ hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
instance cofinite.instIsMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated μ.cofinite where
exists_measurable_subset s hs := by
refine ⟨(toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ, ?_, (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
· rwa [compl_mem_cofinite, measure_toMeasurable]
· rw [compl_subset_comm]
apply subset_toMeasurable
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ae_neBot : (ae μ).NeBot ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans (not_congr ae_eq_bot)
instance Measure.ae.neBot [NeZero μ] : (ae μ).NeBot := ae_neBot.2 <| NeZero.ne μ
@[simp]
theorem ae_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} : ae (0 : Measure α) = ⊥ :=
ae_eq_bot.2 rfl
section Intervals
theorem biSup_measure_Iic [Preorder α] {s : Set α} (hsc : s.Countable)
(hst : ∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) :
⨆ x ∈ s, μ (Iic x) = μ univ := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_eq_iSup hsc]
· congr
simp only [← bex_def] at hst
exact iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 hst
· exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (hdir.directed_val.mono_comp _ fun x y => Iic_subset_Iic.2)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ico_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ico a x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (Ici a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ico_right]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (antitone_const.Ico monotone_id)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ioc_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α]
[(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ioc x a)) atBot (𝓝 (μ (Iic a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ioc_left]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot (monotone_id.Ioc antitone_const)
theorem tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop [Preorder α] [(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Iic x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ univ)) := by
rw [← iUnion_Iic]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop monotone_Iic
theorem tendsto_measure_Ici_atBot [Preorder α] [(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ici x)) atBot (𝓝 (μ univ)) :=
tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop (α := αᵒᵈ) μ
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Iio a =ᵐ[μ] Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_ae_eq_self, measure_mono_null Set.inter_subset_right ha]
theorem Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioi a =ᵐ[μ] Ici a :=
Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ioc_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioc a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ico a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Icc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' ha).symm.trans (Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' hb)
end Intervals
end
end MeasureTheory
end
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,659 | 1,661 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
|
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 761 | 764 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Damiano Testa,
Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
/-!
# Ordered monoids
This file develops the basics of ordered monoids.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
## Remark
Almost no monoid is actually present in this file: most assumptions have been generalized to
`Mul` or `MulOneClass`.
-/
-- TODO: If possible, uniformize lemma names, taking special care of `'`,
-- after the `ordered`-refactor is done.
open Function
section Nat
instance Nat.instMulLeftMono : MulLeftMono ℕ where
elim := fun _ _ _ h => mul_le_mul_left _ h
end Nat
section Int
instance Int.instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono ℤ where
elim := fun _ _ _ h => Int.add_le_add_left h _
end Int
variable {α β : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul α]
section LE
variable [LE α]
/- The prime on this lemma is present only on the multiplicative version. The unprimed version
is taken by the analogous lemma for semiring, with an extra non-negativity assumption. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add_left]
theorem mul_le_mul_left' [MulLeftMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b ≤ c) (a : α) :
a * b ≤ a * c :=
CovariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive le_of_add_le_add_left]
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left' [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(bc : a * b ≤ a * c) :
b ≤ c :=
ContravariantClass.elim _ bc
/- The prime on this lemma is present only on the multiplicative version. The unprimed version
is taken by the analogous lemma for semiring, with an extra non-negativity assumption. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add_right]
theorem mul_le_mul_right' [i : MulRightMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b ≤ c)
(a : α) :
b * a ≤ c * a :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive le_of_add_le_add_right]
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_right' [i : MulRightReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(bc : b * a ≤ c * a) :
b ≤ c :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_right [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
b * a ≤ c * a ↔ b ≤ c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) a
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (· * ·) (· < ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_right [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
b * a < c * a ↔ b < c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_lt_add_left]
theorem mul_lt_mul_left' [MulLeftStrictMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b < c) (a : α) :
a * b < a * c :=
CovariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive lt_of_add_lt_add_left]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b c : α}
(bc : a * b < a * c) :
b < c :=
ContravariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_lt_add_right]
theorem mul_lt_mul_right' [i : MulRightStrictMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b < c)
(a : α) :
b * a < c * a :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive lt_of_add_lt_add_right]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' [i : MulRightReflectLT α] {a b c : α}
(bc : b * a < c * a) :
b < c :=
i.elim a bc
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_mono [MulLeftMono α] {a : α} : Monotone (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_le_mul_left' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_mono [MulRightMono α] {a : α} : Monotone (· * a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_le_mul_right' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_strictMono [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a : α} : StrictMono (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_lt_mul_left' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_strictMono [MulRightStrictMono α] {a : α} : StrictMono (· * a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_lt_mul_right' h _
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α]
{a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) : a * c < b * d :=
calc
a * c < a * d := mul_lt_mul_left' h₂ a
_ < b * d := mul_lt_mul_right' h₁ d
alias add_lt_add := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_right' h₁ _).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_left' h₂ b)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_left' h₂ _).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_right' h₁ d)
/-- Only assumes left strict covariance. -/
@[to_additive "Only assumes left strict covariance"]
theorem Left.mul_lt_mul [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h₁.le h₂
/-- Only assumes right strict covariance. -/
@[to_additive "Only assumes right strict covariance"]
theorem Right.mul_lt_mul [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h₁ h₂.le
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add]
theorem mul_le_mul' [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α]
{a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
a * c ≤ b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_left' h₂ _).trans (mul_le_mul_right' h₁ d)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_mul_three [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d e f : α} (h₁ : a ≤ d) (h₂ : b ≤ e)
(h₃ : c ≤ f) :
a * b * c ≤ d * e * f :=
mul_le_mul' (mul_le_mul' h₁ h₂) h₃
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b < c)
(hle : d ≤ b) :
a * d < c :=
(mul_le_mul_left' hle a).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ≤ c)
(hle : d ≤ b) :
a * d ≤ c :=
@act_rel_of_rel_of_act_rel _ _ _ (· ≤ ·) _ _ a _ _ _ hle h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a * b < c) (hle : d ≤ a) :
d * b < c :=
(mul_le_mul_right' hle b).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : d ≤ a) :
d * b ≤ c :=
(mul_le_mul_right' hle b).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a < b * c)
(hle : c ≤ d) :
a < b * d :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' hle b)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a ≤ b * c)
(hle : c ≤ d) :
a ≤ b * d :=
@rel_act_of_rel_of_rel_act _ _ _ (· ≤ ·) _ _ b _ _ _ hle h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a < b * c) (hle : b ≤ d) :
a < d * c :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' hle c)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ d) :
a ≤ d * c :=
h.trans (mul_le_mul_right' hle c)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_cancel'' [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b = a * c) :
b = c :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.le).antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.ge)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_cancel'' [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b = c * b) :
a = c :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.le).antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.ge)
@[to_additive] lemma mul_le_mul_iff_of_ge [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
a₂ * b₂ ≤ a₁ * b₁ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
haveI := mulLeftMono_of_mulLeftStrictMono α
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
exacts [mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le ha hb, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt ha hb]
@[to_additive] theorem mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) :
a * b = c * d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
haveI := mulLeftMono_of_mulLeftStrictMono α
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
rw [le_antisymm_iff, eq_true (mul_le_mul' hac hbd), true_and, mul_le_mul_iff_of_ge hac hbd]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_inj_of_comparable [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b) :
c * a = b * a ↔ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, (· ▸ rfl)⟩
contrapose h'
obtain h | h := h
· exact mul_lt_mul_right' (h.lt_of_ne' h') a |>.ne'
· exact mul_lt_mul_right' (h.lt_of_ne h') a |>.ne
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_inj_of_comparable [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b) :
a * c = a * b ↔ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, (· ▸ rfl)⟩
contrapose h'
obtain h | h := h
· exact mul_lt_mul_left' (h.lt_of_ne' h') a |>.ne'
· exact mul_lt_mul_left' (h.lt_of_ne h') a |>.ne
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem trichotomy_of_mul_eq_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b = c * d) : (a = c ∧ b = d) ∨ a < c ∨ b < d := by
obtain hac | rfl | hca := lt_trichotomy a c
· right; left; exact hac
· left; simpa using mul_right_inj_of_comparable (LinearOrder.le_total d b)|>.1 h
· obtain hbd | rfl | hdb := lt_trichotomy b d
· right; right; exact hbd
· exact False.elim <| ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_right' hca b) h.symm
· exact False.elim <| ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt hca hdb) h.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_max [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) := mul_left_mono.map_max
@[to_additive]
lemma max_mul [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) := mul_right_mono.map_max
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_min [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
a * min b c = min (a * b) (a * c) := mul_left_mono.map_min
@[to_additive]
lemma min_mul [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
min a b * c = min (a * c) (b * c) := mul_right_mono.map_min
@[to_additive] lemma min_lt_max_of_mul_lt_mul
[MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α]
(h : a * b < c * d) : min a b < max c d := by
simp_rw [min_lt_iff, lt_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_le_mul' h.1.1 h.2.2
@[to_additive] lemma Left.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d := by
simp_rw [min_le_iff, le_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h.1.1.le h.2.2
@[to_additive] lemma Right.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d := by
simp_rw [min_le_iff, le_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h.1.1 h.2.2.le
@[to_additive] lemma min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d :=
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
Left.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul h
/-- Not an instance, to avoid loops with `IsLeftCancelMul.mulLeftStrictMono_of_mulLeftMono`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem MulLeftStrictMono.toIsLeftCancelMul [MulLeftStrictMono α] : IsLeftCancelMul α where
mul_left_cancel _ _ _ h := mul_left_strictMono.injective h
/-- Not an instance, to avoid loops with `IsRightCancelMul.mulRightStrictMono_of_mulRightMono`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem MulRightStrictMono.toIsRightCancelMul [MulRightStrictMono α] : IsRightCancelMul α where
mul_right_cancel _ _ _ h := mul_right_strictMono.injective h
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive max_add_add_le_max_add_max]
theorem max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max' : max (a * b) (c * d) ≤ max a c * max b d :=
max_le (mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) <| le_max_left _ _) <|
mul_le_mul' (le_max_right _ _) <| le_max_right _ _
@[to_additive min_add_min_le_min_add_add]
theorem min_mul_min_le_min_mul_mul' : min a c * min b d ≤ min (a * b) (c * d) :=
le_min (mul_le_mul' (min_le_left _ _) <| min_le_left _ _) <|
mul_le_mul' (min_le_right _ _) <| min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end Mul
-- using one
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α]
section LE
variable [LE α]
@[to_additive le_add_of_nonneg_right]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_right' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (h : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ a * b :=
calc
a = a * 1 := (mul_one a).symm
_ ≤ a * b := mul_le_mul_left' h a
@[to_additive add_le_of_nonpos_right]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_right' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (h : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ a :=
calc
a * b ≤ a * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' h a
_ = a := mul_one a
@[to_additive le_add_of_nonneg_left]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_left' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (h : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ b * a :=
calc
a = 1 * a := (one_mul a).symm
_ ≤ b * a := mul_le_mul_right' h a
@[to_additive add_le_of_nonpos_left]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_left' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (h : b ≤ 1) :
b * a ≤ a :=
calc
b * a ≤ 1 * a := mul_le_mul_right' h a
_ = a := one_mul a
@[to_additive]
theorem one_le_of_le_mul_right [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ a * b) :
1 ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_one_of_mul_le_right [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b : α} (h : a * b ≤ a) :
b ≤ 1 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_le_of_le_mul_left [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α}
(h : b ≤ a * b) :
1 ≤ a :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_one_of_mul_le_left [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α}
(h : a * b ≤ b) :
a ≤ 1 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_right' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_left' [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_iff_right a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_le_iff_nonpos_right]
theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_right' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_le_iff_nonpos_left]
theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_left' [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α} :
a * b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_iff_right b)
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α]
@[to_additive lt_add_of_pos_right]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α} (h : 1 < b) :
a < a * b :=
calc
a = a * 1 := (mul_one a).symm
_ < a * b := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
@[to_additive add_lt_of_neg_right]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α} (h : b < 1) :
a * b < a :=
calc
a * b < a * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
_ = a := mul_one a
@[to_additive lt_add_of_pos_left]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_left' [MulRightStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α}
(h : 1 < b) :
a < b * a :=
calc
a = 1 * a := (one_mul a).symm
_ < b * a := mul_lt_mul_right' h a
@[to_additive add_lt_of_neg_left]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_left' [MulRightStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α}
(h : b < 1) :
b * a < a :=
calc
b * a < 1 * a := mul_lt_mul_right' h a
_ = a := one_mul a
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_of_lt_mul_right [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} (h : a < a * b) :
1 < b :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_one_of_mul_lt_right [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} (h : a * b < a) :
b < 1 :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_of_lt_mul_left [MulRightReflectLT α] {a b : α}
(h : b < a * b) :
1 < a :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_one_of_mul_lt_left [MulRightReflectLT α] {a b : α}
(h : a * b < b) :
a < 1 :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) lt_add_iff_pos_right]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a < a * b ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) lt_add_iff_pos_left]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left' [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] (a : α) {b : α} : a < b * a ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_right a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_lt_iff_neg_left]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} :
a * b < a ↔ b < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_lt_iff_neg_right]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right' [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] {a : α} (b : α) : a * b < b ↔ a < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_right b)
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-! Lemmas of the form `b ≤ c → a ≤ 1 → b * a ≤ c`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_le_of_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a ≤ 1) :
b * a ≤ c :=
calc
b * a ≤ b * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_le_of_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a < b * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a ≤ 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a ≤ b * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ < c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a < b * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ < c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one' [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one hbc ha.le
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_nonpos`."]
theorem Left.mul_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_of_le_of_le_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_le_of_lt_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one'`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg'`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `b ≤ c → 1 ≤ a → b ≤ c * a`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : 1 ≤ a) :
b ≤ c * a :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ ≤ c * a := mul_le_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ < c * a := mul_lt_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 ≤ a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ ≤ c * a := mul_le_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ < c * a := mul_lt_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le hbc ha.le
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_le_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_nonneg "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_nonneg`."]
theorem Left.one_le_mul [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 ≤ a * b :=
le_mul_of_le_of_one_le ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul'`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos' "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos'`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `a ≤ 1 → b ≤ c → a * b ≤ c`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_of_le [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
a * b ≤ c :=
calc
a * b ≤ 1 * b := mul_le_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b < 1 * b := mul_lt_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b ≤ 1 * b := mul_le_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ < c := hb
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b < 1 * b := mul_lt_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ < c := hb
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt' [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hbc : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt ha.le hbc
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_nonpos`."]
theorem Right.mul_le_one [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_of_le_one_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : a < 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one'`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg'`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `1 ≤ a → b ≤ c → b ≤ a * c`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_of_le [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
b ≤ a * c :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ ≤ a * c := mul_le_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ < a * c := mul_lt_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ ≤ a * c := mul_le_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ < a * c := mul_lt_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt' [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt ha.le hbc
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_le_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_nonneg "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_nonneg`."]
theorem Right.one_le_mul [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 ≤ a * b :=
le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul'`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos' "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos'`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt' ha hb
alias mul_le_one' := Left.mul_le_one
alias mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt := Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt
alias mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le := Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le
alias mul_lt_one := Left.mul_lt_one
alias mul_lt_one' := Left.mul_lt_one'
attribute [to_additive add_nonpos "**Alias** of `Left.add_nonpos`."] mul_le_one'
attribute [to_additive add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt
attribute [to_additive add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le
attribute [to_additive "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg`."] mul_lt_one
attribute [to_additive "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg'`."] mul_lt_one'
alias one_le_mul := Left.one_le_mul
alias one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt' := Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt
alias one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' := Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le
alias one_lt_mul' := Left.one_lt_mul
alias one_lt_mul'' := Left.one_lt_mul'
attribute [to_additive add_nonneg "**Alias** of `Left.add_nonneg`."] one_le_mul
attribute [to_additive add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt'
attribute [to_additive add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le'
attribute [to_additive add_pos "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos`."] one_lt_mul'
attribute [to_additive add_pos' "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos'`."] one_lt_mul''
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_of_one_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b < c)
(hle : 1 ≤ b) :
a < c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_right' hle).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_one_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b ≤ c)
(hle : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_right' hle).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_lt_mul_of_le_one_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a < b * c)
(hle : c ≤ 1) :
a < b :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_of_le_one_right' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_le_mul_of_le_one_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a ≤ b * c)
(hle : c ≤ 1) :
a ≤ b :=
h.trans (mul_le_of_le_one_right' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_of_one_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b < c) (hle : 1 ≤ a) :
b < c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_left' hle).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_one_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : 1 ≤ a) :
b ≤ c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_left' hle).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_lt_mul_of_le_one_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a < b * c) (hle : b ≤ 1) :
a < c :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_of_le_one_left' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_le_mul_of_le_one_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ 1) :
a ≤ c :=
h.trans (mul_le_of_le_one_left' hle)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hab : a * b = 1 =>
have : a ≤ 1 := hab ▸ le_mul_of_le_of_one_le le_rfl hb
have : a = 1 := le_antisymm this ha
have : b ≤ 1 := hab ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ha le_rfl
have : b = 1 := le_antisymm this hb
And.intro ‹a = 1› ‹b = 1›)
(by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rw [mul_one])
section Left
variable [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_add_nonneg_left]
theorem eq_one_of_one_le_mul_left (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) (hab : 1 ≤ a * b) : a = 1 :=
ha.eq_of_not_lt fun h => hab.not_lt <| mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le h hb
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_of_mul_le_one_left (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (hab : a * b ≤ 1) : a = 1 :=
ha.eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.not_lt <| one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' h hb
end Left
section Right
variable [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_add_nonneg_right]
theorem eq_one_of_one_le_mul_right (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) (hab : 1 ≤ a * b) : b = 1 :=
hb.eq_of_not_lt fun h => hab.not_lt <| Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt ha h
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_of_mul_le_one_right (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (hab : a * b ≤ 1) : b = 1 :=
hb.eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.not_lt <| Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt ha h
end Right
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem exists_square_le [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) : ∃ b : α, b * b ≤ a := by
by_cases h : a < 1
· use a
have : a * a < a * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
rw [mul_one] at this
exact le_of_lt this
· use 1
push_neg at h
rwa [mul_one]
end LinearOrder
end MulOneClass
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
/- This is not instance, since we want to have an instance from `LeftCancelSemigroup`s
to the appropriate covariant class. -/
/-- A semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `LeftCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `a * c < b * c → a < b`) is a `LeftCancelSemigroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `AddLeftCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `c + a < c + b → a < b`) is a `AddLeftCancelSemigroup`."]
def Contravariant.toLeftCancelSemigroup [MulLeftReflectLE α] :
LeftCancelSemigroup α :=
{ ‹Semigroup α› with mul_left_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_left_cancel'' }
/- This is not instance, since we want to have an instance from `RightCancelSemigroup`s
to the appropriate covariant class. -/
/-- A semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `RightCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `a * c < b * c → a < b`) is a `RightCancelSemigroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `AddRightCancelSemigroup`
(`a + c < b + c → a < b`) is a `AddRightCancelSemigroup`."]
def Contravariant.toRightCancelSemigroup [MulRightReflectLE α] :
RightCancelSemigroup α :=
{ ‹Semigroup α› with mul_right_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_right_cancel'' }
end PartialOrder
end Semigroup
section Mono
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β}
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem Monotone.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (a : α) : Monotone fun x ↦ a * f x :=
mul_left_mono.comp hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem MonotoneOn.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (a : α) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => a * f x) s := mul_left_mono.comp_monotoneOn hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem Antitone.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (a : α) : Antitone fun x ↦ a * f x :=
mul_left_mono.comp_antitone hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem AntitoneOn.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (a : α) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => a * f x) s := mul_left_mono.comp_antitoneOn hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem Monotone.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (a : α) :
Monotone fun x => f x * a := mul_right_mono.comp hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (a : α) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x * a) s := mul_right_mono.comp_monotoneOn hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem Antitone.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (a : α) : Antitone fun x ↦ f x * a :=
mul_right_mono.comp_antitone hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (a : α) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x * a) s := mul_right_mono.comp_antitoneOn hf
/-- The product of two monotone functions is monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two monotone functions is monotone."]
theorem Monotone.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ h => mul_le_mul' (hf h) (hg h)
/-- The product of two monotone functions is monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two monotone functions is monotone."]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
mul_le_mul' (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h)
/-- The product of two antitone functions is antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two antitone functions is antitone."]
theorem Antitone.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ h => mul_le_mul' (hf h) (hg h)
/-- The product of two antitone functions is antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two antitone functions is antitone."]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_le_mul' (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h)
section Left
variable [MulLeftStrictMono α]
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictMono.const_mul' (hf : StrictMono f) (c : α) : StrictMono fun x => c * f x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictMonoOn.const_mul' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => c * f x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ha hb ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictAnti.const_mul' (hf : StrictAnti f) (c : α) : StrictAnti fun x => c * f x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictAntiOn.const_mul' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => c * f x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ha hb ab) c
end Left
section Right
variable [MulRightStrictMono α]
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictMono.mul_const' (hf : StrictMono f) (c : α) : StrictMono fun x => f x * c :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul_const' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * c) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ha hb ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictAnti.mul_const' (hf : StrictAnti f) (c : α) : StrictAnti fun x => f x * c :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul_const' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * c) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ha hb ab) c
end Right
/-- The product of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMono.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : StrictMono g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ ab =>
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ab) (hg ab)
/-- The product of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (hg : StrictMonoOn g s) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ha hb ab) (hg ha hb ab)
/-- The product of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAnti.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictAnti f) (hg : StrictAnti g) :
StrictAnti fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ab) (hg ab)
/-- The product of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (hg : StrictAntiOn g s) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ha hb ab) (hg ha hb ab)
/-- The product of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictMono "The sum of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem Monotone.mul_strictMono' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : StrictMono g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf h.le) (hg h)
/-- The product of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictMono "The sum of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul_strictMono' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : MonotoneOn f s)
(hg : StrictMonoOn g s) : StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf hx hy h.le) (hg hx hy h)
/-- The product of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictAnti "The sum of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem Antitone.mul_strictAnti' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : Antitone f)
(hg : StrictAnti g) :
StrictAnti fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf h.le) (hg h)
/-- The product of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictAnti "The sum of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul_strictAnti' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : AntitoneOn f s)
(hg : StrictAntiOn g s) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf hx hy h.le) (hg hx hy h)
variable [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
/-- The product of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_monotone "The sum of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMono.mul_monotone' (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : Monotone g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf h) (hg h.le)
/-- The product of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_monotone "The sum of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul_monotone' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h.le)
/-- The product of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_antitone "The sum of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAnti.mul_antitone' (hf : StrictAnti f) (hg : Antitone g) :
StrictAnti fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf h) (hg h.le)
/-- The product of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_antitone "The sum of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul_antitone' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h.le)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) cmp_add_left]
theorem cmp_mul_left' {α : Type*} [Mul α] [LinearOrder α] [MulLeftStrictMono α]
(a b c : α) :
cmp (a * b) (a * c) = cmp b c :=
(strictMono_id.const_mul' a).cmp_map_eq b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) cmp_add_right]
theorem cmp_mul_right' {α : Type*} [Mul α] [LinearOrder α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (a b c : α) :
cmp (a * c) (b * c) = cmp a b :=
(strictMono_id.mul_const' c).cmp_map_eq a b
end Mono
/-- An element `a : α` is `MulLECancellable` if `x ↦ a * x` is order-reflecting.
We will make a separate version of many lemmas that require `[MulLeftReflectLE α]` with
`MulLECancellable` assumptions instead. These lemmas can then be instantiated to specific types,
like `ENNReal`, where we can replace the assumption `AddLECancellable x` by `x ≠ ∞`.
-/
@[to_additive
"An element `a : α` is `AddLECancellable` if `x ↦ a + x` is order-reflecting.
We will make a separate version of many lemmas that require `[MulLeftReflectLE α]` with
`AddLECancellable` assumptions instead. These lemmas can then be instantiated to specific types,
like `ENNReal`, where we can replace the assumption `AddLECancellable x` by `x ≠ ∞`. "]
def MulLECancellable [Mul α] [LE α] (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃b c⦄, a * b ≤ a * c → b ≤ c
@[to_additive]
theorem Contravariant.MulLECancellable [Mul α] [LE α] [MulLeftReflectLE α]
{a : α} :
MulLECancellable a :=
fun _ _ => le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulLECancellable_one [MulOneClass α] [LE α] : MulLECancellable (1 : α) := fun a b => by
simpa only [one_mul] using id
namespace MulLECancellable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Injective [Mul α] [PartialOrder α] {a : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
Injective (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h => le_antisymm (ha h.le) (ha h.ge)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inj [Mul α] [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
ha.Injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem injective_left [Mul α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)] [PartialOrder α] {a : α}
(ha : MulLECancellable a) :
Injective (· * a) := fun b c h => ha.Injective <| by dsimp; rwa [i.comm a, i.comm a]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inj_left [Mul α] [@Std.Commutative α (· * ·)] [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
(hc : MulLECancellable c) :
a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
hc.injective_left.eq_iff
variable [LE α]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left [Mul α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α}
(ha : MulLECancellable a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h => ha h, fun h => mul_le_mul_left' h a⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_iff_right [Mul α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)]
[MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
b * a ≤ c * a ↔ b ≤ c := by rw [i.comm b, i.comm c, ha.mul_le_mul_iff_left]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_right [MulOneClass α] [MulLeftMono α]
{a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) ha.mul_le_mul_iff_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_right [MulOneClass α] [MulLeftMono α]
{a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) ha.mul_le_mul_iff_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_left [MulOneClass α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)]
[MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b := by rw [i.comm, ha.le_mul_iff_one_le_right]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_left [MulOneClass α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)]
[MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
b * a ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 := by rw [i.comm, ha.mul_le_iff_le_one_right]
@[to_additive] lemma mul [Semigroup α] {a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a)
(hb : MulLECancellable b) : MulLECancellable (a * b) :=
fun c d hcd ↦ hb <| ha <| by rwa [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]
@[to_additive] lemma of_mul_right [Semigroup α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
(h : MulLECancellable (a * b)) : MulLECancellable b :=
fun c d hcd ↦ h <| by rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left' hcd _
@[to_additive] lemma of_mul_left [CommSemigroup α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
(h : MulLECancellable (a * b)) : MulLECancellable a := (mul_comm a b ▸ h).of_mul_right
end MulLECancellable
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulLECancellable_mul [LE α] [CommSemigroup α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} :
MulLECancellable (a * b) ↔ MulLECancellable a ∧ MulLECancellable b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.of_mul_left, h.of_mul_right⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.mul h.2⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Unbundled/Basic.lean | 1,671 | 1,674 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
/-!
# Definition of nilpotent elements
This file defines the notion of a nilpotent element and proves the immediate consequences.
For results that require further theory, see `Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic`
and `Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas`.
## Main definitions
* `IsNilpotent`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_mul_left`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right`
* `nilpotencyClass`
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
variable {R S : Type*} {x y : R}
/-- An element is said to be nilpotent if some natural-number-power of it equals zero.
Note that we require only the bare minimum assumptions for the definition to make sense. Even
`MonoidWithZero` is too strong since nilpotency is important in the study of rings that are only
power-associative. -/
def IsNilpotent [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] (x : R) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 0
theorem IsNilpotent.mk [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] (x : R) (n : ℕ) (e : x ^ n = 0) : IsNilpotent x :=
⟨n, e⟩
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_of_subsingleton [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] [Subsingleton R] : IsNilpotent x :=
⟨0, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem IsNilpotent.zero [MonoidWithZero R] : IsNilpotent (0 : R) :=
⟨1, pow_one 0⟩
theorem not_isNilpotent_one [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] :
¬ IsNilpotent (1 : R) := fun ⟨_, H⟩ ↦ zero_ne_one (H.symm.trans (one_pow _))
lemma IsNilpotent.pow_succ (n : ℕ) {S : Type*} [MonoidWithZero S] {x : S}
(hx : IsNilpotent x) : IsNilpotent (x ^ n.succ) := by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hx
use N
rw [← pow_mul, Nat.succ_mul, pow_add, hN, mul_zero]
theorem IsNilpotent.of_pow [MonoidWithZero R] {x : R} {m : ℕ}
(h : IsNilpotent (x ^ m)) : IsNilpotent x := by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := h
use m * n
rw [← h, pow_mul x m n]
lemma IsNilpotent.pow_of_pos {n} {S : Type*} [MonoidWithZero S] {x : S}
(hx : IsNilpotent x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsNilpotent (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ => exact IsNilpotent.pow_succ _ hx
|
@[simp]
lemma IsNilpotent.pow_iff_pos {n} {S : Type*} [MonoidWithZero S] {x : S} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
IsNilpotent (x ^ n) ↔ IsNilpotent x :=
⟨of_pow, (pow_of_pos · hn)⟩
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nilpotent/Defs.lean | 70 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Integration
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
/-!
# Variance of random variables
We define the variance of a real-valued random variable as `Var[X] = 𝔼[(X - 𝔼[X])^2]` (in the
`ProbabilityTheory` locale).
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.evariance`: the variance of a real-valued random variable as an extended
non-negative real.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance`: the variance of a real-valued random variable as a real number.
## Main results
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_expectation_sq`: the inequality `Var[X] ≤ 𝔼[X^2]`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq`: Chebyshev's inequality, i.e.,
`ℙ {ω | c ≤ |X ω - 𝔼[X]|} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (Var[X] / c ^ 2)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq`: Chebyshev's inequality formulated with
`evariance` without requiring the random variables to be L².
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.variance_add`: the variance of the sum of two independent
random variables is the sum of the variances.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.variance_sum`: the variance of a finite sum of pairwise
independent random variables is the sum of the variances.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_sub_mul_sub`: the variance of a random variable `X` satisfying
`a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most `(b - 𝔼 X) * (𝔼 X - a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_sq_of_bounded`: the variance of a random variable `X` satisfying
`a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most`((b - a) / 2) ^ 2`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {μ : Measure Ω}
variable (X μ) in
-- Porting note: Consider if `evariance` or `eVariance` is better. Also,
-- consider `eVariationOn` in `Mathlib.Analysis.BoundedVariation`.
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of a real-valued random variable defined as the Lebesgue integral of
`‖X - 𝔼[X]‖^2`. -/
def evariance : ℝ≥0∞ := ∫⁻ ω, ‖X ω - μ[X]‖ₑ ^ 2 ∂μ
variable (X μ) in
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of a real-valued random variable defined by applying `ENNReal.toReal`
to `evariance`. -/
def variance : ℝ := (evariance X μ).toReal
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the measure `μ`.
This is defined as the Lebesgue integral of `(X - 𝔼[X])^2`. -/
scoped notation "eVar[" X "; " μ "]" => ProbabilityTheory.evariance X μ
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the volume
measure.
This is defined as the Lebesgue integral of `(X - 𝔼[X])^2`. -/
scoped notation "eVar[" X "]" => eVar[X; MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume]
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the measure `μ`.
It is set to `0` if `X` has infinite variance. -/
scoped notation "Var[" X "; " μ "]" => ProbabilityTheory.variance X μ
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the volume measure.
It is set to `0` if `X` has infinite variance. -/
scoped notation "Var[" X "]" => Var[X; MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume]
theorem evariance_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) : evariance X μ < ∞ := by
have := ENNReal.pow_lt_top (hX.sub <| memLp_const <| μ[X]).2 (n := 2)
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.toReal_one, one_div] at this
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ENNReal.rpow_one] at this
simp_rw [ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
exact this
lemma evariance_ne_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) : evariance X μ ≠ ∞ :=
(evariance_lt_top hX).ne
theorem evariance_eq_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hXm : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) (hX : ¬MemLp X 2 μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ := by
by_contra h
rw [← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h
have : MemLp (fun ω => X ω - μ[X]) 2 μ := by
refine ⟨hXm.sub aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top]
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, ENNReal.toReal_one, ENNReal.rpow_two, Ne]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by linarith) h.ne
refine hX ?_
convert this.add (memLp_const μ[X])
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, sub_add_cancel]
theorem evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ < ∞ ↔ MemLp X 2 μ where
mp := by contrapose!; rw [top_le_iff]; exact evariance_eq_top hX
mpr := evariance_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias evariance_lt_top_iff_memℒp := evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp
lemma evariance_eq_top_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ ↔ ¬ MemLp X 2 μ := by simp [← evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp hX]
theorem ofReal_variance [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) :
.ofReal (variance X μ) = evariance X μ := by
rw [variance, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact evariance_ne_top hX
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.evariance_lt_top := evariance_lt_top
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.evariance_ne_top := evariance_ne_top
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.ofReal_variance_eq := ofReal_variance
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_lt_top := evariance_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_ne_top := evariance_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal_variance_eq := ofReal_variance
variable (X μ) in
theorem evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal :
evariance X μ = ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal ((X ω - μ[X]) ^ 2) ∂μ := by
simp [evariance, ← enorm_pow, Real.enorm_of_nonneg (sq_nonneg _)]
lemma variance_eq_integral (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) : Var[X; μ] = ∫ ω, (X ω - μ[X]) ^ 2 ∂μ := by
simp [variance, evariance, toReal_enorm, ← integral_toReal ((hX.sub_const _).enorm.pow_const _) <|
.of_forall fun _ ↦ ENNReal.pow_lt_top enorm_lt_top]
lemma variance_of_integral_eq_zero (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) (hXint : μ[X] = 0) :
variance X μ = ∫ ω, X ω ^ 2 ∂μ := by
simp [variance_eq_integral hX, hXint]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq := variance_eq_integral
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq_of_integral_eq_zero := variance_of_integral_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem evariance_zero : evariance 0 μ = 0 := by simp [evariance]
theorem evariance_eq_zero_iff (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = 0 ↔ X =ᵐ[μ] fun _ => μ[X] := by
simp [evariance, lintegral_eq_zero_iff' ((hX.sub_const _).enorm.pow_const _), EventuallyEq,
sub_eq_zero]
theorem evariance_mul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
evariance (fun ω => c * X ω) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (c ^ 2) * evariance X μ := by
rw [evariance, evariance, ← lintegral_const_mul' _ _ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top.ne]
congr with ω
rw [integral_const_mul, ← mul_sub, enorm_mul, mul_pow, ← enorm_pow,
Real.enorm_of_nonneg (sq_nonneg _)]
@[simp]
theorem variance_zero (μ : Measure Ω) : variance 0 μ = 0 := by
simp only [variance, evariance_zero, ENNReal.toReal_zero]
theorem variance_nonneg (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) : 0 ≤ variance X μ :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
theorem variance_mul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
variance (fun ω => c * X ω) μ = c ^ 2 * variance X μ := by
rw [variance, evariance_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sq_nonneg _)]
rfl
theorem variance_smul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
variance (c • X) μ = c ^ 2 * variance X μ :=
variance_mul c X μ
theorem variance_smul' {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra A ℝ] (c : A) (X : Ω → ℝ)
(μ : Measure Ω) : variance (c • X) μ = c ^ 2 • variance X μ := by
convert variance_smul (algebraMap A ℝ c) X μ using 1
· congr; simp only [algebraMap_smul]
· simp only [Algebra.smul_def, map_pow]
theorem variance_def' [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) :
variance X μ = μ[X ^ 2] - μ[X] ^ 2 := by
simp only [variance_eq_integral hX.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable, sub_sq']
rw [integral_sub, integral_add]; rotate_left
· exact hX.integrable_sq
· apply integrable_const
· apply hX.integrable_sq.add
apply integrable_const
· exact ((hX.integrable one_le_two).const_mul 2).mul_const' _
simp only [integral_const, measureReal_univ_eq_one, smul_eq_mul, one_mul, integral_mul_const,
integral_const_mul, Pi.pow_apply]
ring
theorem variance_le_expectation_sq [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ}
(hm : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) : variance X μ ≤ μ[X ^ 2] := by
by_cases hX : MemLp X 2 μ
· rw [variance_def' hX]
simp only [sq_nonneg, sub_le_self_iff]
rw [variance, evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal, ← integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
· by_cases hint : Integrable X μ; swap
· simp only [integral_undef hint, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_zero]
exact le_rfl
· rw [integral_undef]
· exact integral_nonneg fun a => sq_nonneg _
intro h
have A : MemLp (X - fun ω : Ω => μ[X]) 2 μ :=
(memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq (hint.aestronglyMeasurable.sub aestronglyMeasurable_const)).2 h
have B : MemLp (fun _ : Ω => μ[X]) 2 μ := memLp_const _
apply hX
convert A.add B
simp
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun x => sq_nonneg _
· exact (AEMeasurable.pow_const (hm.aemeasurable.sub_const _) _).aestronglyMeasurable
theorem evariance_def' [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = (∫⁻ ω, ‖X ω‖ₑ ^ 2 ∂μ) - ENNReal.ofReal (μ[X] ^ 2) := by
by_cases hℒ : MemLp X 2 μ
· rw [← ofReal_variance hℒ, variance_def' hℒ, ENNReal.ofReal_sub _ (sq_nonneg _)]
congr
simp_rw [← enorm_pow, enorm]
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral]
· simp
· simpa using hℒ.abs.integrable_sq
· symm
rw [evariance_eq_top hX hℒ, ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff]
refine ⟨?_, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top⟩
rw [MemLp, not_and] at hℒ
specialize hℒ hX
simp only [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top, not_lt, top_le_iff,
ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, one_div, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, inv_lt_zero, inv_pos, and_true,
or_iff_not_imp_left, not_and_or, zero_lt_two] at hℒ
exact mod_cast hℒ fun _ => zero_le_two
/-- **Chebyshev's inequality** for `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance. -/
theorem meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) {c : ℝ≥0}
(hc : c ≠ 0) : μ {ω | ↑c ≤ |X ω - μ[X]|} ≤ evariance X μ / c ^ 2 := by
have A : (c : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have B : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun _ : Ω => μ[X]) μ := aestronglyMeasurable_const
convert meas_ge_le_mul_pow_eLpNorm μ two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top (hX.sub B) A using 1
· congr
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← coe_nnnorm,
NNReal.coe_le_coe, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
· rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top]
simp only [show ENNReal.ofNNReal (c ^ 2) = (ENNReal.ofNNReal c) ^ 2 by norm_cast,
ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, one_div, Pi.sub_apply]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow, mul_comm, ENNReal.rpow_two]
congr
simp_rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ENNReal.rpow_two,
ENNReal.rpow_one, evariance]
/-- **Chebyshev's inequality**: one can control the deviation probability of a real random variable
from its expectation in terms of the variance. -/
theorem meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {X : Ω → ℝ} (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) {c : ℝ}
(hc : 0 < c) : μ {ω | c ≤ |X ω - μ[X]|} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (variance X μ / c ^ 2) := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hc.ne.symm), hX.ofReal_variance_eq]
convert @meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq _ _ _ _ hX.1 c.toNNReal (by simp [hc]) using 1
· simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', max_le_iff, abs_nonneg, and_true]
· rw [ENNReal.ofReal_pow hc.le]
rfl
-- Porting note: supplied `MeasurableSpace Ω` argument of `h` by unification
/-- The variance of the sum of two independent random variables is the sum of the variances. -/
theorem IndepFun.variance_add [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (hX : MemLp X 2 μ)
(hY : MemLp Y 2 μ) (h : IndepFun X Y μ) : variance (X + Y) μ = variance X μ + variance Y μ :=
calc
variance (X + Y) μ = μ[fun a => X a ^ 2 + Y a ^ 2 + 2 * X a * Y a] - μ[X + Y] ^ 2 := by
simp [variance_def' (hX.add hY), add_sq']
| _ = μ[X ^ 2] + μ[Y ^ 2] + (2 : ℝ) * μ[X * Y] - (μ[X] + μ[Y]) ^ 2 := by
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.mul_apply, mul_assoc]
rw [integral_add, integral_add, integral_add, integral_const_mul]
· exact hX.integrable one_le_two
· exact hY.integrable one_le_two
· exact hX.integrable_sq
· exact hY.integrable_sq
| Mathlib/Probability/Variance.lean | 277 | 283 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
/-!
# The orthogonal projection
Given a nonempty complete subspace `K` of an inner product space `E`, this file constructs
`K.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K`, the orthogonal projection of `E` onto `K`. This map
satisfies: for any point `u` in `E`, the point `v = K.orthogonalProjection u` in `K` minimizes the
distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
Also a linear isometry equivalence `K.reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E` is constructed, by choosing, for
each `u : E`, the point `K.reflection u` to satisfy
`u + (K.reflection u) = 2 • K.orthogonalProjection u`.
Basic API for `orthogonalProjection` and `reflection` is developed.
Next, the orthogonal projection is used to prove a series of more subtle lemmas about the
orthogonal complement of complete subspaces of `E` (the orthogonal complement itself was
defined in `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal`); the lemma
`Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace`, stating that for a complete subspace `K` of `E` we have
`K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤`, is a typical example.
## References
The orthogonal projection construction is adapted from
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open InnerProductSpace
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Finsupp
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
/-! ### Orthogonal projection in inner product spaces -/
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
/-- **Existence of minimizers**, aka the **Hilbert projection theorem**.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete convex subset.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`. -/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
/-- Characterization of minimizers for the projection on a convex set in a real inner product
space. -/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
exact le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
namespace Submodule
/-- Existence of projections on complete subspaces.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty complete subspace.
Then there exists a (unique) `v` in `K` that minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` to `u`.
This point `v` is usually called the orthogonal projection of `u` onto `K`.
-/
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace, in the real case.
Let `u` be a point in a real inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`).
This is superseded by `norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero` that gives the same conclusion over
any `RCLike` field.
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
/-- Characterization of minimizers in the projection on a subspace.
Let `u` be a point in an inner product space, and let `K` be a nonempty subspace.
Then point `v` minimizes the distance `‖u - v‖` over points in `K` if and only if
for all `w ∈ K`, `⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0` (i.e., `u - v` is orthogonal to the subspace `K`)
-/
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply RCLike.ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (K'.norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero hv).2 this
/-- A subspace `K : Submodule 𝕜 E` has an orthogonal projection if every vector `v : E` admits an
orthogonal projection to `K`. -/
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
K.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases K.exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← K.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero hwK]
instance [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮ.HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).HasOrthogonalProjection where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
(K.map f.toLinearIsometry).HasOrthogonalProjection :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E).HasOrthogonalProjection := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace, as an
unbundled function. This definition is only intended for use in
setting up the bundled version `orthogonalProjection` and should not
be used once that is defined. -/
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
variable {K}
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is in the given subspace.
This lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
/-- The characterization of the unbundled orthogonal projection. This
lemma is only intended for use in setting up the bundled version
and should not be used once that is defined. -/
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
/-- The unbundled orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K`
with the orthogonality property. This lemma is only intended for use
in setting up the bundled version and should not be used once that is
defined. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - K.orthogonalProjectionFn u), K.orthogonalProjectionFn u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖v - K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ +
‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ * ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn v‖ := by
set p := K.orthogonalProjectionFn v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
/-- The orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace. -/
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨K.orthogonalProjectionFn v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (K.orthogonalProjectionFn x + K.orthogonalProjectionFn y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • K.orthogonalProjectionFn x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖K.orthogonalProjectionFn x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [K.orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq x]
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
K.orthogonalProjectionFn v = (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) :=
rfl
/-- The characterization of the orthogonal projection. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - K.orthogonalProjection v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
/-- The difference of `v` from its orthogonal projection onto `K` is in `Kᗮ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - K.orthogonalProjection v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
/-- The orthogonal projection is the unique point in `K` with the
orthogonality property. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
/-- A point in `K` with the orthogonality property (here characterized in terms of `Kᗮ`) must be the
orthogonal projection. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u : E) = u - K.orthogonalProjection u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (K.orthogonalProjection u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
Kᗮ.orthogonalProjection u =
⟨u - K.orthogonalProjection u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
/-- The orthogonal projection of `y` on `U` minimizes the distance `‖y - x‖` for `x ∈ U`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [U.HasOrthogonalProjection] (y : E) :
‖y - U.orthogonalProjection y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [U.norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
/-- The orthogonal projections onto equal subspaces are coerced back to the same point in `E`. -/
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [K'.HasOrthogonalProjection]
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (K.orthogonalProjection u : E) = (K'.orthogonalProjection u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- The orthogonal projection sends elements of `K` to themselves. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : K.orthogonalProjection v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
/-- A point equals its orthogonal projection if and only if it lies in the subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (K.orthogonalProjection v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : K.orthogonalProjection v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
@[simp]
theorem ker_orthogonalProjection : LinearMap.ker K.orthogonalProjection = Kᗮ := by
ext; exact orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection]
(x : E) : f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f.toLinearMap).orthogonalProjection (f x) := by
refine (eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero ?_ fun y hy => ?_).symm
· refine Submodule.apply_coe_mem_map _ _
rcases hy with ⟨x', hx', rfl : f x' = y⟩
rw [← f.map_sub, f.inner_map_map, orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x x' hx']
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] [(p.map f).HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E) :
f (p.orthogonalProjection x) = (p.map f).orthogonalProjection (f x) :=
have : (p.map f.toLinearMap).HasOrthogonalProjection := ‹_›
f.map_orthogonalProjection p x
/-- Orthogonal projection onto the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E')
(p : Submodule 𝕜 E) [p.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
((p.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')).orthogonalProjection x : E') =
f (p.orthogonalProjection (f.symm x)) := by
simpa only [f.coe_toLinearIsometry, f.apply_symm_apply] using
(f.toLinearIsometry.map_orthogonalProjection' p (f.symm x)).symm
/-- The orthogonal projection onto the trivial submodule is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_bot : (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E).orthogonalProjection = 0 := by ext
variable (K)
/-- The orthogonal projection has norm `≤ 1`. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_norm_le : ‖K.orthogonalProjection‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by norm_num) _
variable (𝕜)
theorem smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜) • ((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
suffices (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection (((‖v‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) • w)) : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v by
simpa using this
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
· rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
use ⟪v, w⟫
· rw [← Submodule.mem_orthogonal', Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left]
simp [inner_sub_left, inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, mul_comm]
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_singleton {v : E} (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = (⟪v, w⟫ / ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • v := by
by_cases hv : v = 0
· rw [hv, eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule (Submodule.span_zero_singleton 𝕜)]
simp
have hv' : ‖v‖ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.mpr hv)
have key :
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)) • (((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w) : E) =
(((‖v‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : 𝕜)⁻¹ * ⟪v, w⟫) • v := by
simp [mul_smul, smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w, -map_pow]
convert key using 1 <;> field_simp [hv']
/-- Formula for orthogonal projection onto a single unit vector. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_unit_singleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (w : E) :
((𝕜 ∙ v).orthogonalProjection w : E) = ⟪v, w⟫ • v := by
rw [← smul_orthogonalProjection_singleton 𝕜 w]
simp [hv]
end orthogonalProjection
section reflection
variable [K.HasOrthogonalProjection]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `reflection`: the reflection as a linear equivalence. -/
def reflectionLinearEquiv : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive
(2 • (K.subtype.comp K.orthogonalProjection.toLinearMap) - LinearMap.id) fun x => by
simp [two_smul]
/-- Reflection in a complete subspace of an inner product space. The word "reflection" is
sometimes understood to mean specifically reflection in a codimension-one subspace, and sometimes
more generally to cover operations such as reflection in a point. The definition here, of
reflection in a subspace, is a more general sense of the word that includes both those common
cases. -/
def reflection : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ K.reflectionLinearEquiv with
norm_map' := by
intro x
let w : K := K.orthogonalProjection x
let v := x - w
have : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0 := orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero x w w.2
convert norm_sub_eq_norm_add this using 2
· rw [LinearEquiv.coe_mk, reflectionLinearEquiv, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_ofInvolutive, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, two_smul,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply, Submodule.subtype_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
dsimp [v]
abel
· simp only [v, add_sub_cancel, eq_self_iff_true] }
variable {K}
/-- The result of reflecting. -/
theorem reflection_apply (p : E) : K.reflection p = 2 • (K.orthogonalProjection p : E) - p :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_symm : K.reflection.symm = K.reflection :=
rfl
/-- Reflection is its own inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_inv : K.reflection⁻¹ = K.reflection :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Reflecting twice in the same subspace. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_reflection (p : E) : K.reflection (K.reflection p) = p :=
K.reflection.left_inv p
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
theorem reflection_involutive : Function.Involutive K.reflection :=
K.reflection_reflection
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_trans_reflection :
K.reflection.trans K.reflection = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_involutive K
/-- Reflection is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_mul_reflection : K.reflection * K.reflection = 1 :=
reflection_trans_reflection _
theorem reflection_orthogonal_apply (v : E) : Kᗮ.reflection v = -K.reflection v := by
simp [reflection_apply]; abel
theorem reflection_orthogonal : Kᗮ.reflection = .trans K.reflection (.neg _) := by
ext; apply reflection_orthogonal_apply
variable {K}
theorem reflection_singleton_apply (u v : E) :
reflection (𝕜 ∙ u) v = 2 • (⟪u, v⟫ / ((‖u‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2)) • u - v := by
rw [reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_singleton, ofReal_pow]
/-- A point is its own reflection if and only if it is in the subspace. -/
theorem reflection_eq_self_iff (x : E) : K.reflection x = x ↔ x ∈ K := by
rw [← orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff, reflection_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← two_smul 𝕜,
two_smul ℕ, ← two_smul 𝕜]
refine (smul_right_injective E ?_).eq_iff
exact two_ne_zero
theorem reflection_mem_subspace_eq_self {x : E} (hx : x ∈ K) : K.reflection x = x :=
(reflection_eq_self_iff x).mpr hx
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map_apply {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (x : E') :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) x = f (K.reflection (f.symm x)) := by
simp [two_smul, reflection_apply, orthogonalProjection_map_apply f K x]
/-- Reflection in the `Submodule.map` of a subspace. -/
theorem reflection_map {E E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[K.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
reflection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) = f.symm.trans (K.reflection.trans f) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| reflection_map_apply f K
/-- Reflection through the trivial subspace {0} is just negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem reflection_bot : reflection (⊥ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg 𝕜 := by
ext; simp [reflection_apply]
end reflection
end Submodule
section Orthogonal
namespace Submodule
/-- If `K₁` is complete and contained in `K₂`, `K₁` and `K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂` span `K₂`. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace {K₁ K₂ : Submodule 𝕜 E} (h : K₁ ≤ K₂)
[K₁.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K₁ ⊔ K₁ᗮ ⊓ K₂ = K₂ := by
ext x
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
let v : K₁ := orthogonalProjection K₁ x
have hvm : x - v ∈ K₁ᗮ := sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
exact K₂.add_mem (h hy) hz.2
· exact fun hx => ⟨v, v.prop, x - v, ⟨hvm, K₂.sub_mem hx (h v.prop)⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable {K} in
/-- If `K` is complete, `K` and `Kᗮ` span the whole space. -/
theorem sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : K ⊔ Kᗮ = ⊤ := by
convert Submodule.sup_orthogonal_inf_of_completeSpace (le_top : K ≤ ⊤) using 2
simp
/-- If `K` is complete, any `v` in `E` can be expressed as a sum of elements of `K` and `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] (v : E) :
∃ y ∈ K, ∃ z ∈ Kᗮ, v = y + z :=
⟨K.orthogonalProjection v, Subtype.coe_prop _, v - K.orthogonalProjection v,
sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _, by simp⟩
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, then the orthogonal complement of its orthogonal
complement is itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : Kᗮᗮ = K := by
ext v
constructor
· obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := K.exists_add_mem_mem_orthogonal v
intro hv
have hz' : z = 0 := by
have hyz : ⟪z, y⟫ = 0 := by simp [hz y hy, inner_eq_zero_symm]
simpa [inner_add_right, hyz] using hv z hz
simp [hy, hz']
· intro hv w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact hw v hv
/-- In a Hilbert space, the orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement of a subspace `K`
is the topological closure of `K`.
Note that the completeness assumption is necessary. Let `E` be the space `ℕ →₀ ℝ` with inner space
structure inherited from `PiLp 2 (fun _ : ℕ ↦ ℝ)`. Let `K` be the subspace of sequences with the sum
of all elements equal to zero. Then `Kᗮ = ⊥`, `Kᗮᗮ = ⊤`. -/
theorem orthogonal_orthogonal_eq_closure [CompleteSpace E] :
Kᗮᗮ = K.topologicalClosure := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· convert Submodule.orthogonal_orthogonal_monotone K.le_topologicalClosure using 1
rw [K.topologicalClosure.orthogonal_orthogonal]
· exact K.topologicalClosure_minimal K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal Kᗮ.isClosed_orthogonal
variable {K}
/-- If `K` admits an orthogonal projection, `K` and `Kᗮ` are complements of each other. -/
theorem isCompl_orthogonal_of_completeSpace [K.HasOrthogonalProjection] : IsCompl K Kᗮ :=
| ⟨K.orthogonal_disjoint, codisjoint_iff.2 Submodule.sup_orthogonal_of_completeSpace⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 796 | 798 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
/-!
# Pell's equation and Matiyasevic's theorem
This file solves Pell's equation, i.e. integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`
*in the special case that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`*.
This is then applied to prove Matiyasevic's theorem that the power
function is Diophantine, which is the last key ingredient in the solution to Hilbert's tenth
problem. For the definition of Diophantine function, see `NumberTheory.Dioph`.
For results on Pell's equation for arbitrary (positive, non-square) `d`, see
`NumberTheory.Pell`.
## Main definition
* `pell` is a function assigning to a natural number `n` the `n`-th solution to Pell's equation
constructed recursively from the initial solution `(0, 1)`.
## Main statements
* `eq_pell` shows that every solution to Pell's equation is recursively obtained using `pell`
* `matiyasevic` shows that a certain system of Diophantine equations has a solution if and only if
the first variable is the `x`-component in a solution to Pell's equation - the key step towards
Hilbert's tenth problem in Davis' version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
* `eq_pow_of_pell` shows that the power function is Diophantine.
## Implementation notes
The proof of Matiyasevic's theorem doesn't follow Matiyasevic's original account of using Fibonacci
numbers but instead Davis' variant of using solutions to Pell's equation.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevič's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Pell's equation, Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
-/
namespace Pell
open Nat
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- The property of being a solution to the Pell equation, expressed
as a property of elements of `ℤ√d`. -/
def IsPell : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨x, y⟩ => x * x - d * y * y = 1
theorem isPell_norm : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b * star b = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff, IsPell, mul_comm]; ring_nf
theorem isPell_iff_mem_unitary : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b ∈ unitary (ℤ√d)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [unitary.mem_iff, isPell_norm, mul_comm (star _), and_self_iff]
theorem isPell_mul {b c : ℤ√d} (hb : IsPell b) (hc : IsPell c) : IsPell (b * c) :=
isPell_norm.2 (by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm c, mul_assoc,
star_mul, isPell_norm.1 hb, isPell_norm.1 hc])
theorem isPell_star : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ IsPell (star b)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [IsPell, Zsqrtd.star_mk]
end
section
variable {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a)
private def d (_a1 : 1 < a) :=
a * a - 1
@[simp]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d a1 :=
tsub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) (by decide) (Nat.zero_le _) : 1 * 1 < a * a)
-- TODO(lint): Fix double namespace issue
/-- The Pell sequences, i.e. the sequence of integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`, where
`d = a ^ 2 - 1`, defined together in mutual recursion. -/
--@[nolint dup_namespace]
def pell : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
| 0 => (1, 0)
| n+1 => ((pell n).1 * a + d a1 * (pell n).2, (pell n).1 + (pell n).2 * a)
/-- The Pell `x` sequence. -/
def xn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).1
/-- The Pell `y` sequence. -/
def yn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).2
@[simp]
theorem pell_val (n : ℕ) : pell a1 n = (xn a1 n, yn a1 n) :=
show pell a1 n = ((pell a1 n).1, (pell a1 n).2) from
match pell a1 n with
| (_, _) => rfl
@[simp]
theorem xn_zero : xn a1 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yn_zero : yn a1 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem xn_succ (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n * a + d a1 * yn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yn_succ (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n + yn a1 n * a :=
rfl
theorem xn_one : xn a1 1 = a := by simp
theorem yn_one : yn a1 1 = 1 := by simp
/-- The Pell `x` sequence, considered as an integer sequence. -/
def xz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
xn a1 n
/-- The Pell `y` sequence, considered as an integer sequence. -/
def yz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
yn a1 n
section
/-- The element `a` such that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`, considered as an integer. -/
def az (a : ℕ) : ℤ :=
a
end
include a1 in
theorem asq_pos : 0 < a * a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1)
(by have := @Nat.mul_le_mul_left 1 a a (le_of_lt a1); rwa [mul_one] at this)
theorem dz_val : ↑(d a1) = az a * az a - 1 :=
have : 1 ≤ a * a := asq_pos a1
by rw [Pell.d, Int.ofNat_sub this]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem xz_succ (n : ℕ) : (xz a1 (n + 1)) = xz a1 n * az a + d a1 * yz a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yz_succ (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n + yz a1 n * az a :=
rfl
/-- The Pell sequence can also be viewed as an element of `ℤ√d` -/
def pellZd (n : ℕ) : ℤ√(d a1) :=
⟨xn a1 n, yn a1 n⟩
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_re (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).re = xn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_im (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).im = yn a1 n :=
rfl
theorem isPell_nat {x y : ℕ} : IsPell (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ↔ x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1 :=
⟨fun h =>
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).1
(by rw [Int.ofNat_sub (Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat <| Int.le.intro_sub _ h)]; exact h),
fun h =>
show ((x * x : ℕ) - (d a1 * y * y : ℕ) : ℤ) = 1 by
rw [← Int.ofNat_sub <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ h, h]; rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_succ (n : ℕ) : pellZd a1 (n + 1) = pellZd a1 n * ⟨a, 1⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem isPell_one : IsPell (⟨a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) :=
show az a * az a - d a1 * 1 * 1 = 1 by simp [dz_val]
theorem isPell_pellZd : ∀ n : ℕ, IsPell (pellZd a1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
let o := isPell_one a1
simpa using Pell.isPell_mul (isPell_pellZd n) o
@[simp]
theorem pell_eqz (n : ℕ) : xz a1 n * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 n = 1 :=
isPell_pellZd a1 n
@[simp]
theorem pell_eq (n : ℕ) : xn a1 n * xn a1 n - d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n = 1 :=
let pn := pell_eqz a1 n
have h : (↑(xn a1 n * xn a1 n) : ℤ) - ↑(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n) = 1 := by
repeat' rw [Int.natCast_mul]; exact pn
have hl : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n ≤ xn a1 n * xn a1 n :=
Nat.cast_le.1 <| Int.le.intro _ <| add_eq_of_eq_sub' <| Eq.symm h
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).1 (by rw [Int.ofNat_sub hl]; exact h)
instance dnsq : Zsqrtd.Nonsquare (d a1) :=
⟨fun n h =>
have : n * n + 1 = a * a := by rw [← h]; exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (asq_pos a1)
have na : n < a := Nat.mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.1 (by rw [← this]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _)
have : (n + 1) * (n + 1) ≤ n * n + 1 := by rw [this]; exact Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self na
have : n + n ≤ 0 :=
@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ (n * n + 1) _ (by ring_nf at this ⊢; assumption)
Nat.ne_of_gt (d_pos a1) <| by
rwa [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero ((Nat.le_add_left _ _).trans this)] at h⟩
theorem xn_ge_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ≤ xn a1 n
| 0 => le_refl 1
| | n + 1 => by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, xn_succ]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PellMatiyasevic.lean | 223 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
/-!
# Tensor products of direct sums
This file shows that taking `TensorProduct`s commutes with taking `DirectSum`s in both arguments.
## Main results
* `TensorProduct.directSum`
* `TensorProduct.directSumLeft`
* `TensorProduct.directSumRight`
-/
suppress_compilation
universe u v₁ v₂ w₁ w₁' w₂ w₂'
section Ring
namespace TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
open DirectSum
open LinearMap
attribute [local ext] TensorProduct.ext
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] (S) [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable {ι₁ : Type v₁} {ι₂ : Type v₂}
variable [DecidableEq ι₁] [DecidableEq ι₂]
variable (M₁ : ι₁ → Type w₁) (M₁' : Type w₁') (M₂ : ι₂ → Type w₂) (M₂' : Type w₂')
variable [∀ i₁, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i₁)] [AddCommMonoid M₁']
variable [∀ i₂, AddCommMonoid (M₂ i₂)] [AddCommMonoid M₂']
variable [∀ i₁, Module R (M₁ i₁)] [Module R M₁'] [∀ i₂, Module R (M₂ i₂)] [Module R M₂']
variable [∀ i₁, Module S (M₁ i₁)] [∀ i₁, IsScalarTower R S (M₁ i₁)]
/-- The linear equivalence `(⨁ i₁, M₁ i₁) ⊗ (⨁ i₂, M₂ i₂) ≃ (⨁ i₁, ⨁ i₂, M₁ i₁ ⊗ M₂ i₂)`, i.e.
"tensor product distributes over direct sum". -/
protected def directSum :
((⨁ i₁, M₁ i₁) ⊗[R] ⨁ i₂, M₂ i₂) ≃ₗ[S] ⨁ i : ι₁ × ι₂, M₁ i.1 ⊗[R] M₂ i.2 := by
refine LinearEquiv.ofLinear ?toFun ?invFun ?left ?right
· exact AlgebraTensorModule.lift <|
toModule S _ _ fun i₁ => flip <| toModule R _ _ fun i₂ => flip <| AlgebraTensorModule.curry <|
DirectSum.lof S (ι₁ × ι₂) (fun i => M₁ i.1 ⊗[R] M₂ i.2) (i₁, i₂)
· exact toModule S _ _ fun i => AlgebraTensorModule.map (lof S _ M₁ i.1) (lof R _ M₂ i.2)
· ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ x₁ x₂ : 4
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, toModule_lof, AlgebraTensorModule.map_tmul,
AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, lift.tmul, coe_restrictScalars, flip_apply,
AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, curry_apply, id_comp]
· ext i₁ i₂ x₁ x₂ : 5
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, lift.tmul, toModule_lof, flip_apply,
AlgebraTensorModule.map_tmul, id_coe, id_eq]
/-- Tensor products distribute over a direct sum on the left . -/
def directSumLeft : (⨁ i₁, M₁ i₁) ⊗[R] M₂' ≃ₗ[R] ⨁ i, M₁ i ⊗[R] M₂' :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear
(lift <|
DirectSum.toModule R _ _ fun _ =>
(mk R _ _).compr₂ <| DirectSum.lof R ι₁ (fun i => M₁ i ⊗[R] M₂') _)
(DirectSum.toModule R _ _ fun _ => rTensor _ (DirectSum.lof R ι₁ _ _))
(DirectSum.linearMap_ext R fun i =>
TensorProduct.ext <|
LinearMap.ext₂ fun m₁ m₂ => by
dsimp only [comp_apply, compr₂_apply, id_apply, mk_apply]
simp_rw [DirectSum.toModule_lof, rTensor_tmul, lift.tmul, DirectSum.toModule_lof,
compr₂_apply, mk_apply])
(TensorProduct.ext <|
DirectSum.linearMap_ext R fun i =>
LinearMap.ext₂ fun m₁ m₂ => by
dsimp only [comp_apply, compr₂_apply, id_apply, mk_apply]
simp_rw [lift.tmul, DirectSum.toModule_lof, compr₂_apply,
mk_apply, DirectSum.toModule_lof, rTensor_tmul])
/-- Tensor products distribute over a direct sum on the right. -/
def directSumRight : (M₁' ⊗[R] ⨁ i, M₂ i) ≃ₗ[R] ⨁ i, M₁' ⊗[R] M₂ i :=
TensorProduct.comm R _ _ ≪≫ₗ directSumLeft R M₂ M₁' ≪≫ₗ
DFinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv fun _ => TensorProduct.comm R _ _
variable {M₁ M₁' M₂ M₂'}
@[simp]
theorem directSum_lof_tmul_lof (i₁ : ι₁) (m₁ : M₁ i₁) (i₂ : ι₂) (m₂ : M₂ i₂) :
TensorProduct.directSum R S M₁ M₂ (DirectSum.lof S ι₁ M₁ i₁ m₁ ⊗ₜ DirectSum.lof R ι₂ M₂ i₂ m₂) =
DirectSum.lof S (ι₁ × ι₂) (fun i => M₁ i.1 ⊗[R] M₂ i.2) (i₁, i₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) := by
simp [TensorProduct.directSum]
@[simp]
theorem directSum_symm_lof_tmul (i₁ : ι₁) (m₁ : M₁ i₁) (i₂ : ι₂) (m₂ : M₂ i₂) :
(TensorProduct.directSum R S M₁ M₂).symm
(DirectSum.lof S (ι₁ × ι₂) (fun i => M₁ i.1 ⊗[R] M₂ i.2) (i₁, i₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂)) =
(DirectSum.lof S ι₁ M₁ i₁ m₁ ⊗ₜ DirectSum.lof R ι₂ M₂ i₂ m₂) := by
rw [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, directSum_lof_tmul_lof]
@[simp]
theorem directSumLeft_tmul_lof (i : ι₁) (x : M₁ i) (y : M₂') :
directSumLeft R M₁ M₂' (DirectSum.lof R _ _ i x ⊗ₜ[R] y) =
DirectSum.lof R _ _ i (x ⊗ₜ[R] y) := by
dsimp only [directSumLeft, LinearEquiv.ofLinear_apply, lift.tmul]
rw [DirectSum.toModule_lof R i]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem directSumLeft_symm_lof_tmul (i : ι₁) (x : M₁ i) (y : M₂') :
(directSumLeft R M₁ M₂').symm (DirectSum.lof R _ _ i (x ⊗ₜ[R] y)) =
DirectSum.lof R _ _ i x ⊗ₜ[R] y := by
rw [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, directSumLeft_tmul_lof]
@[simp]
theorem directSumRight_tmul_lof (x : M₁') (i : ι₂) (y : M₂ i) :
directSumRight R M₁' M₂ (x ⊗ₜ[R] DirectSum.lof R _ _ i y) =
DirectSum.lof R _ _ i (x ⊗ₜ[R] y) := by
dsimp only [directSumRight, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, TensorProduct.comm_tmul]
rw [directSumLeft_tmul_lof]
exact DFinsupp.mapRange_single (hf := fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem directSumRight_symm_lof_tmul (x : M₁') (i : ι₂) (y : M₂ i) :
(directSumRight R M₁' M₂).symm (DirectSum.lof R _ _ i (x ⊗ₜ[R] y)) =
x ⊗ₜ[R] DirectSum.lof R _ _ i y := by
rw [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, directSumRight_tmul_lof]
lemma directSumRight_comp_rTensor (f : M₁' →ₗ[R] M₂'):
(directSumRight R M₂' M₁).toLinearMap ∘ₗ f.rTensor _ =
(lmap fun _ ↦ f.rTensor _) ∘ₗ directSumRight R M₁' M₁ := by
ext; simp
end TensorProduct
end Ring
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/DirectSum/TensorProduct.lean | 180 | 185 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Unions of finite sets
This file defines the union of a family `t : α → Finset β` of finsets bounded by a finset
`s : Finset α`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.disjUnion`: Given a hypothesis `h` which states that finsets `s` and `t` are disjoint,
`s.disjUnion t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`; this does
not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.biUnion`: Finite unions of finsets; given an indexing function `f : α → Finset β` and an
`s : Finset α`, `s.biUnion f` is the union of all finsets of the form `f a` for `a ∈ s`.
## TODO
Remove `Finset.biUnion` in favour of `Finset.sup`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero MulAction
variable {α β γ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {t t₁ t₂ : α → Finset β}
namespace Finset
section DisjiUnion
/-- `disjiUnion s f h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjiUnion s f` iff `a ∈ f i` for some `i ∈ s`.
It is the same as `s.biUnion f`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The
hypothesis ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (hf : (s : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint t) : Finset β :=
⟨s.val.bind (Finset.val ∘ t), Multiset.nodup_bind.2
⟨fun a _ ↦ (t a).nodup, s.nodup.pairwise fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦ disjoint_val.2 <| hf ha hb hab⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).1 = s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_empty (t : α → Finset β) : disjiUnion ∅ t (by simp) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_disjiUnion {b : β} {h} : b ∈ s.disjiUnion t h ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, disjiUnion_val, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_disjiUnion {h} : (s.disjiUnion t h : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_disjiUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (f : α → Finset β) (H) :
disjiUnion (cons a s ha) f H =
(f a).disjUnion ((s.disjiUnion f) fun _ hb _ hc ↦ H (mem_cons_of_mem hb) (mem_cons_of_mem hc))
(disjoint_left.2 fun _ hb h ↦
let ⟨_, hc, h⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp h
disjoint_left.mp
(H (mem_cons_self a s) (mem_cons_of_mem hc) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc ha).symm) hb h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.cons_bind _ _ _
@[simp] lemma singleton_disjiUnion (a : α) {h} : Finset.disjiUnion {a} t h = t a :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_bind _ _
lemma disjiUnion_disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (g : β → Finset γ) (h1 h2) :
(s.disjiUnion f h1).disjiUnion g h2 =
s.attach.disjiUnion
(fun a ↦ ((f a).disjiUnion g) fun _ hb _ hc ↦
h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hb⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hc⟩))
fun a _ b _ hab ↦
disjoint_left.mpr fun x hxa hxb ↦ by
obtain ⟨xa, hfa, hga⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxa
obtain ⟨xb, hfb, hgb⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxb
refine disjoint_left.mp
(h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hfa⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, b.prop, hfb⟩) ?_) hga
hgb
rintro rfl
exact disjoint_left.mp (h1 a.prop b.prop <| Subtype.coe_injective.ne hab) hfa hfb :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_assoc.trans (Multiset.attach_bind_coe _ _).symm
lemma sUnion_disjiUnion {f : α → Finset (Set β)} (I : Finset α)
(hf : (I : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint f) :
⋃₀ (I.disjiUnion f hf : Set (Set β)) = ⋃ a ∈ I, ⋃₀ ↑(f a) := by
ext
simp only [coe_disjiUnion, Set.mem_sUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, exists_prop]
tauto
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β}
private lemma pairwiseDisjoint_fibers : Set.PairwiseDisjoint ↑t fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a) :=
fun x' hx y' hy hne ↦ by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]; rintro i ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, rfl⟩; exact hne rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_filter_eq (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α → β) :
t.disjiUnion (fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a)) pairwiseDisjoint_fibers =
s.filter fun c ↦ f c ∈ t :=
ext fun b => by simpa using and_comm
lemma disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) :
t.disjiUnion (fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a)) pairwiseDisjoint_fibers = s := by
simpa [filter_eq_self]
end DecidableEq
theorem map_disjiUnion {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {t : β → Finset γ} {h} :
(s.map f).disjiUnion t h =
s.disjiUnion (fun a => t (f a)) fun _ ha _ hb hab =>
h (mem_map_of_mem _ ha) (mem_map_of_mem _ hb) (f.injective.ne hab) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_map _ _ _
theorem disjiUnion_map {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β} {f : β ↪ γ} {h} :
(s.disjiUnion t h).map f =
s.disjiUnion (fun a => (t a).map f) (h.mono' fun _ _ ↦ (disjoint_map _).2) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_bind _ _ _
variable {f : α → β} {op : β → β → β} [hc : Std.Commutative op] [ha : Std.Associative op]
theorem fold_disjiUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Finset α} {b : ι → β} {b₀ : β} (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).fold op (s.fold op b₀ b) f = s.fold op b₀ fun i => (t i).fold op (b i) f :=
(congr_arg _ <| Multiset.map_bind _ _ _).trans (Multiset.fold_bind _ _ _ _ _)
end DisjiUnion
section BUnion
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `Finset.biUnion s t` is the union of `t a` over `a ∈ s`.
(This was formerly `bind` due to the monad structure on types with `DecidableEq`.) -/
protected def biUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) : Finset β :=
(s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1).toFinset
@[simp] lemma biUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).1 = (s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1).dedup := rfl
@[simp] lemma biUnion_empty : Finset.biUnion ∅ t = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_biUnion {b : β} : b ∈ s.biUnion t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, biUnion_val, Multiset.mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_biUnion : (s.biUnion t : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_biUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp]
lemma biUnion_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : (insert a s).biUnion t = t a ∪ s.biUnion t := by
aesop
lemma biUnion_congr (hs : s₁ = s₂) (ht : ∀ a ∈ s₁, t₁ a = t₂ a) :
s₁.biUnion t₁ = s₂.biUnion t₂ := by
aesop
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_eq_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (hf) :
s.disjiUnion f hf = s.biUnion f := eq_of_veq (s.disjiUnion f hf).nodup.dedup.symm
lemma biUnion_subset {s' : Finset β} : s.biUnion t ⊆ s' ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ s' := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨fun H a ha b hb ↦ H ⟨a, ha, hb⟩, fun H b ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ ↦ H a ha hb⟩
@[simp]
lemma singleton_biUnion {a : α} : Finset.biUnion {a} t = t a := by
classical rw [← insert_empty_eq, biUnion_insert, biUnion_empty, union_empty]
lemma biUnion_inter (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (t : Finset β) :
s.biUnion f ∩ t = s.biUnion fun x ↦ f x ∩ t := by
ext x
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_inter]
tauto
|
lemma inter_biUnion (t : Finset β) (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) :
t ∩ s.biUnion f = s.biUnion fun x ↦ t ∩ f x := by
rw [inter_comm, biUnion_inter]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Union.lean | 175 | 178 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Gabriel Ebner, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Conditionally complete linear order structure on `ℕ`
In this file we
* define a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` structure on `ℕ`;
* prove a few lemmas about `iSup`/`iInf`/`Set.iUnion`/`Set.iInter` and natural numbers.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
open scoped Classical in
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true, eq_self_iff_true, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = 0 := by
rw [sInf_eq_zero]
right
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iInf_of_empty {ι : Sort*} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℕ) : iInf f = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
/-- This combines `Nat.iInf_of_empty` with `ciInf_const`. -/
@[simp]
lemma iInf_const_zero {ι : Sort*} : ⨅ _ : ι, 0 = 0 :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty ι).elim (fun h ↦ by simp) fun h ↦ sInf_eq_zero.2 <| by simp
theorem sInf_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s := by
classical
rw [Nat.sInf_def h]
exact Nat.find_spec h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_sInf {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m < sInf s) : m ∉ s := by
classical
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h; apply not_mem_empty
| inr h => rw [Nat.sInf_def h] at hm; exact Nat.find_min h hm
protected theorem sInf_le {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Nat.sInf_def ⟨m, hm⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨m, hm⟩ hm
theorem nonempty_of_pos_sInf {s : Set ℕ} (h : 0 < sInf s) : s.Nonempty := by
by_contra contra
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at contra
have h' : sInf s ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt h
apply h'
rw [Nat.sInf_eq_zero]
right
assumption
theorem nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ {s : Set ℕ} {k : ℕ} (h : sInf s = k + 1) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_pos_sInf (h.symm ▸ succ_pos k : sInf s > 0)
theorem eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed {s : Set ℕ} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hs' : ∀ k₁ k₂ : ℕ, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s) : s = Ici (sInf s) :=
ext fun n ↦ ⟨fun H ↦ Nat.sInf_le H, fun H ↦ hs' (sInf s) n H (sInf_mem hs)⟩
theorem sInf_upward_closed_eq_succ_iff {s : Set ℕ} (hs : ∀ k₁ k₂ : ℕ, k₁ ≤ k₂ → k₁ ∈ s → k₂ ∈ s)
(k : ℕ) : sInf s = k + 1 ↔ k + 1 ∈ s ∧ k ∉ s := by
classical
constructor
· intro H
rw [eq_Ici_of_nonempty_of_upward_closed (nonempty_of_sInf_eq_succ _) hs, H, mem_Ici, mem_Ici]
· exact ⟨le_rfl, k.not_succ_le_self⟩
· exact k
· assumption
· rintro ⟨H, H'⟩
rw [sInf_def (⟨_, H⟩ : s.Nonempty), find_eq_iff]
exact ⟨H, fun n hnk hns ↦ H' <| hs n k (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp hnk) hns⟩
/-- This instance is necessary, otherwise the lattice operations would be derived via
`ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` and marked as noncomputable. -/
instance : Lattice ℕ :=
LinearOrder.toLattice
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ℕ :=
{ (inferInstance : OrderBot ℕ), (LinearOrder.toLattice : Lattice ℕ),
(inferInstance : LinearOrder ℕ) with
le_csSup := fun s a hb ha ↦ by rw [sSup_def hb]; revert a ha; exact @Nat.find_spec _ _ hb
csSup_le := fun s a _ ha ↦ by rw [sSup_def ⟨a, ha⟩]; exact Nat.find_min' _ ha
le_csInf := fun s a hs hb ↦ by
rw [sInf_def hs]; exact hb (@Nat.find_spec (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ _)
csInf_le := fun s a _ ha ↦ by rw [sInf_def ⟨a, ha⟩]; exact Nat.find_min' _ ha
csSup_empty := by
simp only [sSup_def, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, forall_const, forall_prop_of_false,
not_false_iff, exists_const]
apply bot_unique (Nat.find_min' _ _)
trivial
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := by
intro s hs
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left, sSup,
mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff, forall_const, exists_const, dite_true]
rw [dif_neg]
· exact le_antisymm (zero_le _) (find_le trivial)
· exact hs
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s hs ↦ by simp at hs }
theorem sSup_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddAbove s) : sSup s ∈ s :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
h₁.csSup_mem ((finite_le_nat k).subset hk)
theorem sInf_add {n : ℕ} {p : ℕ → Prop} (hn : n ≤ sInf { m | p m }) :
sInf { m | p (m + n) } + n = sInf { m | p m } := by
classical
obtain h | ⟨m, hm⟩ := { m | p (m + n) }.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [h, Nat.sInf_empty, zero_add]
obtain hnp | hnp := hn.eq_or_lt
· exact hnp
suffices hp : p (sInf { m | p m } - n + n) from (h.subset hp).elim
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel hn]
exact csInf_mem (nonempty_of_pos_sInf <| n.zero_le.trans_lt hnp)
· have hp : ∃ n, n ∈ { m | p m } := ⟨_, hm⟩
rw [Nat.sInf_def ⟨m, hm⟩, Nat.sInf_def hp]
rw [Nat.sInf_def hp] at hn
exact find_add hn
theorem sInf_add' {n : ℕ} {p : ℕ → Prop} (h : 0 < sInf { m | p m }) :
sInf { m | p m } + n = sInf { m | p (m - n) } := by
suffices h₁ : n ≤ sInf {m | p (m - n)} by
convert sInf_add h₁
simp_rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := nonempty_of_pos_sInf h
refine
le_csInf ⟨m + n, ?_⟩ fun b hb ↦
le_of_not_lt fun hbn ↦
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ?_ (not_mem_of_lt_sInf h) (Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hbn.le)
· dsimp
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
· exact hb
section
variable {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α]
theorem iSup_lt_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k < n + 1, u k = (⨆ k < n, u k) ⊔ u n := by
simp_rw [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, biSup_le_eq_sup]
theorem iSup_lt_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k < n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊔ ⨆ k < n, u (k + 1) := by
rw [← sup_iSup_nat_succ]
simp
theorem iInf_lt_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ k < n + 1, u k = (⨅ k < n, u k) ⊓ u n :=
@iSup_lt_succ αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem iInf_lt_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ k < n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊓ ⨅ k < n, u (k + 1) :=
@iSup_lt_succ' αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem iSup_le_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k ≤ n + 1, u k = (⨆ k ≤ n, u k) ⊔ u (n + 1) := by
simp_rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, iSup_lt_succ]
theorem iSup_le_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨆ k ≤ n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊔ ⨆ k ≤ n, u (k + 1) := by
simp_rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, iSup_lt_succ']
theorem iInf_le_succ (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ k ≤ n + 1, u k = (⨅ k ≤ n, u k) ⊓ u (n + 1) :=
@iSup_le_succ αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem iInf_le_succ' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : ⨅ k ≤ n + 1, u k = u 0 ⊓ ⨅ k ≤ n, u (k + 1) :=
@iSup_le_succ' αᵒᵈ _ _ _
end
end Nat
|
namespace Set
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 208 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
ENat.toNat (trailingDegree p)
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) :=
.symm <| ENat.coe_toNat <| mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_inj]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, ENat.toNat_eq_iff hn]
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, h]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p :=
ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n :=
ENat.toNat_le_of_le_coe <| trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe <| support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 :=
Finset.min_eq_bot.trans mem_support_iff
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, or_comm]
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans <| by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p :=
(trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h).trans natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n :=
mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_le] at H
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (hq : q ≠ 0)
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree :=
ENat.toNat_le_toNat hpq <| by simpa
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
|
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 178 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Exhaustion
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure with a given density with respect to another measure
For a measure `μ` on `α` and a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, we define a new measure `μ.withDensity f`.
On a measurable set `s`, that measure has value `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ`.
An important result about `withDensity` is the Radon-Nikodym theorem. It states that, given measures
`μ, ν`, if `HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν` then `μ` is absolutely continuous with respect to
`ν` if and only if there exists a measurable function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` such that
`μ = ν.withDensity f`.
See `MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_iff_withDensity_rnDeriv_eq`.
-/
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory.Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a measure `μ : Measure α` and a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, `μ.withDensity f` is the
measure such that for a measurable set `s` we have `μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ`. -/
noncomputable
def Measure.withDensity {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ) (by simp) fun _ hs hd =>
lintegral_iUnion hs hd _
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_apply (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
Measure.ofMeasurable_apply s hs
theorem withDensity_apply_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ μ.withDensity f s := by
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
calc
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_set (subset_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)
_ = μ.withDensity f t :=
(withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)).symm
_ = μ.withDensity f s := measure_toMeasurable s
/-! In the next theorem, the s-finiteness assumption is necessary. Here is a counterexample
without this assumption. Let `α` be an uncountable space, let `x₀` be some fixed point, and consider
the σ-algebra made of those sets which are countable and do not contain `x₀`, and of their
complements. This is the σ-algebra generated by the sets `{x}` for `x ≠ x₀`. Define a measure equal
to `+∞` on nonempty sets. Let `s = {x₀}` and `f` the indicator of `sᶜ`. Then
* `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ = 0`. Indeed, consider a simple function `g ≤ f`. It vanishes on `s`. Then
`∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ = 0`. Taking the supremum over `g` gives the claim.
* `μ.withDensity f s = +∞`. Indeed, this is the infimum of `μ.withDensity f t` over measurable sets
`t` containing `s`. As `s` is not measurable, such a set `t` contains a point `x ≠ x₀`. Then
`μ.withDensity f t ≥ μ.withDensity f {x} = ∫⁻ a in {x}, f a ∂μ = μ {x} = +∞`.
One checks that `μ.withDensity f = μ`, while `μ.restrict s` gives zero mass to sets not
containing `x₀`, and infinite mass to those that contain it. -/
theorem withDensity_apply' [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (withDensity_apply_le f s)
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
μ.withDensity f s ≤ μ.withDensity f t := measure_mono (subset_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by congr 1; exact restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite s
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero_left (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : (0 : Measure α).withDensity f = 0 := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
simp
theorem withDensity_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f = μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae h)
lemma withDensity_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f ≤ μ.withDensity g := by
refine le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
refine setLIntegral_mono_ae' hs ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x h_le using fun _ ↦ h_le
theorem withDensity_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.add_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs,
← lintegral_add_left hf]
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
theorem withDensity_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
simpa only [add_comm] using withDensity_add_left hg f
theorem withDensity_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ + ν).withDensity f = μ.withDensity f + ν.withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_add, lintegral_add_measure, Measure.add_apply]
theorem withDensity_sum {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : ι → Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(sum μ).withDensity f = sum fun n => (μ n).withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_sum μ hs, lintegral_sum_measure]
theorem withDensity_smul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul r hf]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem withDensity_smul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem withDensity_smul_measure (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(r • μ).withDensity f = r • μ.withDensity f := by
ext s hs
simp [withDensity_apply, hs]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity f) :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top := by
rwa [withDensity_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_univ, lt_top_iff_ne_top] }
theorem withDensity_absolutelyContinuous {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity f ≪ μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs₁ hs₂ => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs₁]
exact setLIntegral_measure_zero _ _ hs₂
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_zero : μ.withDensity 0 = 0 := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_one : μ.withDensity 1 = μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : μ.withDensity (fun _ ↦ c) = c • μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
theorem withDensity_tsum {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, Measurable (f i)) :
μ.withDensity (∑' n, f n) = sum fun n => μ.withDensity (f n) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
change ∫⁻ x in s, (∑' n, f n) x ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ x, f i x ∂μ.restrict s
rw [← lintegral_tsum fun i => (h i).aemeasurable]
exact lintegral_congr fun x => tsum_apply (Pi.summable.2 fun _ => ENNReal.summable)
theorem withDensity_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator f) = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [withDensity_apply _ ht, lintegral_indicator hs, restrict_comm hs, ←
withDensity_apply _ ht]
theorem withDensity_indicator_one {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator 1) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [withDensity_indicator hs, withDensity_one]
theorem withDensity_ofReal_mutuallySingular {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) ⟂ₘ
μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| -f x := by
set S : Set α := { x | f x < 0 }
have hS : MeasurableSet S := measurableSet_lt hf measurable_const
refine ⟨S, hS, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact (ae_restrict_mem hS).mono fun x hx => ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (le_of_lt hx)
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS.compl, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.neg.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact
(ae_restrict_mem hS.compl).mono fun x hx =>
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (not_lt.1 <| mt neg_pos.1 hx)
theorem restrict_withDensity {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply _ (ht.inter hs),
restrict_restrict ht]
theorem restrict_withDensity' [SFinite μ] (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply' _ (t ∩ s),
restrict_restrict ht]
lemma trim_withDensity {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable[m] f) :
(μ.withDensity f).trim hm = (μ.trim hm).withDensity f := by
refine @Measure.ext _ m _ _ (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, restrict_trim _ _ hs, lintegral_trim _ hf, trim_measurableSet_eq _ hs,
withDensity_apply _ (hm s hs)]
lemma Measure.MutuallySingular.withDensity {ν : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ ⟂ₘ ν) :
μ.withDensity f ⟂ₘ ν :=
MutuallySingular.mono_ac h (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _) AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.withDensity f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, withDensity_apply _ .univ, restrict_univ, lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf]
alias ⟨withDensity_eq_zero, _⟩ := withDensity_eq_zero_iff
theorem withDensity_apply_eq_zero' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.withDensity f s = 0 ↔ μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s) = 0 := by
constructor
· intro hs
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
apply measure_mono_null (inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s))
have A : μ.withDensity f t = 0 := by rw [measure_toMeasurable, hs]
rw [withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ s),
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (AEMeasurable.restrict hf),
EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff'₀, ae_iff] at A
swap
· simp only [measurableSet_toMeasurable, MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, mem_setOf_eq, Filter.mem_mk] at A
convert A using 2
ext x
simp only [and_comm, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq,
mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
· intro hs
let t := toMeasurable μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s)
have A : s ⊆ t ∪ { x | f x = 0 } := by
intro x hx
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (fx | fx)
· simp only [fx, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, or_true]
· left
apply subset_toMeasurable _ _
exact ⟨fx, hx⟩
apply measure_mono_null A (measure_union_null _ _)
· apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
rwa [measure_toMeasurable]
rcases hf with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
have t : {x | f x = 0} =ᵐ[μ.withDensity f] {x | g x = 0} := by
apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
filter_upwards [hfg] with a ha
rw [eq_iff_iff]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h] at ha; exact ha.symm,
fun h ↦ by rw [h] at ha; exact ha⟩
rw [measure_congr t, withDensity_congr_ae hfg]
have M : MeasurableSet { x : α | g x = 0 } := hg (measurableSet_singleton _)
rw [withDensity_apply _ M, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hg]
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem M]
simp only [imp_self, Pi.zero_apply, imp_true_iff]
theorem withDensity_apply_eq_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity f s = 0 ↔ μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s) = 0 :=
withDensity_apply_eq_zero' <| hf.aemeasurable
theorem ae_withDensity_iff' {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
rw [ae_iff, ae_iff, withDensity_apply_eq_zero' hf, iff_iff_eq]
congr
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall]
theorem ae_withDensity_iff {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0 → p x :=
ae_withDensity_iff' <| hf.aemeasurable
theorem ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict' {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict { x | f x ≠ 0 }, p x := by
rw [ae_withDensity_iff' hf, ae_restrict_iff'₀]
· simp only [mem_setOf]
· rcases hf with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
have nonneg_eq_ae : {x | g x ≠ 0} =ᵐ[μ] {x | f x ≠ 0} := by
filter_upwards [hfg] with a ha
simp only [eq_iff_iff]
exact ⟨fun (h : g a ≠ 0) ↦ by rwa [← ha] at h,
fun (h : f a ≠ 0) ↦ by rwa [ha] at h⟩
exact NullMeasurableSet.congr
(MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet
<| hg (measurableSet_singleton _)).compl
nonneg_eq_ae
theorem ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict { x | f x ≠ 0 }, p x :=
ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict' <| hf.aemeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔
AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞) * g x) μ := by
have t : ∃ f', Measurable f' ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] f' := hf
rcases t with ⟨f', hf'_m, hf'_ae⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨g', g'meas, hg'⟩
have A : MeasurableSet {x | f' x ≠ 0} := hf'_m (measurableSet_singleton _).compl
refine ⟨fun x => f' x * g' x, hf'_m.coe_nnreal_ennreal.smul g'meas, ?_⟩
apply ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl { x | f' x ≠ 0 }
· rw [EventuallyEq, ae_withDensity_iff' hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal] at hg'
rw [ae_restrict_iff' A]
filter_upwards [hg', hf'_ae] with a ha h'a h_a_nonneg
have : (f' a : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero] using h_a_nonneg
rw [← h'a] at this ⊢
rw [ha this]
· rw [ae_restrict_iff' A.compl]
filter_upwards [hf'_ae] with a ha ha_null
have ha_null : f' a = 0 := Function.nmem_support.mp ha_null
rw [ha_null] at ha ⊢
rw [ha]
simp only [ENNReal.coe_zero, zero_mul]
· rintro ⟨g', g'meas, hg'⟩
refine ⟨fun x => ((f' x)⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * g' x, hf'_m.coe_nnreal_ennreal.inv.smul g'meas, ?_⟩
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_withDensity_iff' hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal]
filter_upwards [hg', hf'_ae] with a hfga hff'a h'a
rw [hff'a] at hfga h'a
rw [← hfga, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h'a ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
theorem aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Measurable f) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔
AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞) * g x) μ :=
aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff' <| hf.aemeasurable
open MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
/-- This is Exercise 1.2.1 from [tao2010]. It allows you to express integration of a measurable
function with respect to `(μ.withDensity f)` as an integral with respect to `μ`, called the base
measure. `μ` is often the Lebesgue measure, and in this circumstance `f` is the probability density
function, and `(μ.withDensity f)` represents any continuous random variable as a
probability measure, such as the uniform distribution between 0 and 1, the Gaussian distribution,
the exponential distribution, the Beta distribution, or the Cauchy distribution (see Section 2.4
of [wasserman2004]). Thus, this method shows how to one can calculate expectations, variances,
and other moments as a function of the probability density function.
-/
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(h_mf : Measurable f) :
∀ {g : α → ℝ≥0∞}, Measurable g → ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
apply Measurable.ennreal_induction
· intro c s h_ms
simp [*, mul_comm _ c, ← indicator_mul_right]
· intro g h _ h_mea_g _ h_ind_g h_ind_h
simp [mul_add, *, Measurable.mul]
· intro g h_mea_g h_mono_g h_ind
have : Monotone fun n a => f a * g n a := fun m n hmn x => mul_le_mul_left' (h_mono_g hmn x) _
simp [lintegral_iSup, ENNReal.mul_iSup, h_mf.mul (h_mea_g _), *]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul (μ : Measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ x in s, (f * g) x ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ hf hg]
/-- The Lebesgue integral of `g` with respect to the measure `μ.withDensity f` coincides with
the integral of `f * g`. This version assumes that `g` is almost everywhere measurable. For a
version without conditions on `g` but requiring that `f` is almost everywhere finite, see
`lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable` -/
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity f)) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
let f' := hf.mk f
have : μ.withDensity f = μ.withDensity f' := withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
rw [this] at hg ⊢
let g' := hg.mk g
calc
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f' = ∫⁻ a, g' a ∂μ.withDensity f' := lintegral_congr_ae hg.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f' * g') a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk)
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f' * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
apply ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl { x | f' x ≠ 0 }
· have Z := hg.ae_eq_mk
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict hf.measurable_mk] at Z
filter_upwards [Z]
intro x hx
simp only [g', hx, Pi.mul_apply]
· have M : MeasurableSet { x : α | f' x ≠ 0 }ᶜ :=
(hf.measurable_mk (measurableSet_singleton 0).compl).compl
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem M]
intro x hx
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, zero_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
_ = ∫⁻ a : α, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk]
intro x hx
simp only [f', hx, Pi.mul_apply]
lemma setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity f))
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf.restrict]
rw [← restrict_withDensity hs]
exact hg.restrict
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀ {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ :=
lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf (hg.mono' (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f))
lemma setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀ {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ :=
setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf
(hg.mono' (MeasureTheory.withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f)) hs
theorem lintegral_withDensity_le_lintegral_mul (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(f_meas : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) : (∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f) ≤ ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i i_meas => iSup_le fun hi => ?_
have A : f * i ≤ f * g := fun x => mul_le_mul_left' (hi x) _
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (f * i) (f_meas.mul i_meas) ?_
exact le_iSup_of_le A (le_of_eq (lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ f_meas i_meas))
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(f_meas : Measurable f) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (lintegral_withDensity_le_lintegral_mul μ f_meas g) ?_
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i i_meas => iSup_le fun hi => ?_
have A : (fun x => (f x)⁻¹ * i x) ≤ g := by
intro x
dsimp
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact div_le_of_le_mul' (hi x)
refine le_iSup_of_le (fun x => (f x)⁻¹ * i x) (le_iSup_of_le (f_meas.inv.mul i_meas) ?_)
refine le_iSup_of_le A ?_
rw [lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ f_meas (f_meas.inv.mul i_meas)]
apply lintegral_mono_ae
filter_upwards [hf]
intro x h'x
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (hx | hx)
· have := hi x
simp only [hx, zero_mul, Pi.mul_apply, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
simp [this]
· apply le_of_eq _
dsimp
rw [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hx h'x.ne, one_mul]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(f_meas : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x < ∞) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable _ f_meas hf]
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable₀ (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h'f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
let f' := hf.mk f
calc
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f' := by
rw [withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f' * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable _ hf.measurable_mk
filter_upwards [h'f, hf.ae_eq_mk]
intro x hx h'x
rwa [← h'x]
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk]
intro x hx
simp only [f', hx, Pi.mul_apply]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀ (μ : Measure α)
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h'f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x < ∞) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable₀ _ hf h'f]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀' (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ]
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Set α) (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(h'f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x < ∞) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity' s, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable₀ _ hf h'f]
theorem withDensity_mul₀ {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
μ.withDensity (f * g) = (μ.withDensity f).withDensity g := by
ext1 s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs, restrict_withDensity hs,
lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀ hf.restrict hg.restrict]
theorem withDensity_mul (μ : Measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
μ.withDensity (f * g) = (μ.withDensity f).withDensity g :=
withDensity_mul₀ hf.aemeasurable hg.aemeasurable
lemma withDensity_inv_same_le {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(μ.withDensity f).withDensity f⁻¹ ≤ μ := by
change (μ.withDensity f).withDensity (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) ≤ μ
rw [← withDensity_mul₀ hf hf.inv]
suffices (f * fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) ≤ᵐ[μ] 1 by
refine (withDensity_mono this).trans ?_
rw [withDensity_one]
filter_upwards with x
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.one_apply]
by_cases hx_top : f x = ∞
· simp only [hx_top, ENNReal.inv_top, mul_zero, zero_le]
by_cases hx_zero : f x = 0
· simp only [hx_zero, ENNReal.inv_zero, zero_mul, zero_le]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hx_zero hx_top]
lemma withDensity_inv_same₀ {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_ne_zero : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0) (hf_ne_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).withDensity (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) = μ := by
rw [← withDensity_mul₀ hf hf.inv]
suffices (f * fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) =ᵐ[μ] 1 by
rw [withDensity_congr_ae this, withDensity_one]
filter_upwards [hf_ne_zero, hf_ne_top] with x hf_ne_zero hf_ne_top
simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hf_ne_zero hf_ne_top, Pi.one_apply]
lemma withDensity_inv_same {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) (hf_ne_zero : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0) (hf_ne_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).withDensity (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) = μ :=
withDensity_inv_same₀ hf.aemeasurable hf_ne_zero hf_ne_top
/-- If `f` is almost everywhere positive, then `μ ≪ μ.withDensity f`. See also
`withDensity_absolutelyContinuous` for the reverse direction, which always holds. -/
lemma withDensity_absolutelyContinuous' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_ne_zero : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0) :
μ ≪ μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun s hs hμs ↦ ?_)
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.restrict,
ae_eq_restrict_iff_indicator_ae_eq hs, Set.indicator_zero', Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff] at hμs
simp only [ae_iff, ne_eq, not_not] at hf_ne_zero
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero, not_forall, exists_prop] at hμs
have hle : s ⊆ {a | a ∈ s ∧ ¬f a = 0} ∪ {a | f a = 0} :=
fun x hx ↦ or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr <| fun hnx ↦ ⟨hx, hnx⟩
exact measure_mono_null hle <| nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| le_trans (measure_union_le _ _)
<| hμs.symm ▸ zero_add _ |>.symm ▸ hf_ne_zero.le
theorem withDensity_ae_eq {β : Type} {f g : α → β} {d : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : AEMeasurable d μ) (h_ae_nonneg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, d x ≠ 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ.withDensity d] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
Iff.intro
(fun h ↦ Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_eq
(withDensity_absolutelyContinuous' hd h_ae_nonneg) h)
(fun h ↦ Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_eq
(withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ d) h)
/-- If `μ` is a σ-finite measure, then so is `μ.withDensity fun x ↦ f x`
for any `ℝ≥0`-valued function `f`. -/
| protected instance SigmaFinite.withDensity [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
SigmaFinite (μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ f x)) := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨fun n ↦ spanningSets μ n ∩ f ⁻¹' (Iic n), fun _ ↦ trivial, fun n ↦ ?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩
· rw [withDensity_apply']
apply setLIntegral_lt_top_of_bddAbove
· exact ((measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans_lt (measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ n)).ne
· exact ⟨n, forall_mem_image.2 fun x hx ↦ hx.2⟩
· rw [iUnion_eq_univ_iff]
refine fun x ↦ ⟨max (spanningSetsIndex μ x) ⌈f x⌉₊, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact mem_spanningSets_of_index_le _ _ (le_max_left ..)
· simp [Nat.le_ceil]
lemma SigmaFinite.withDensity_of_ne_top [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf_ne_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) : SigmaFinite (μ.withDensity f) := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensity.lean | 554 | 567 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Morenikeji Neri
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Nonunits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.UniqueFactorizationDomain
/-!
# Principal ideal rings, principal ideal domains, and Bézout rings
A principal ideal ring (PIR) is a ring in which all left ideals are principal. A
principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain which is a principal ideal ring.
The definition of `IsPrincipalIdealRing` can be found in `Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span`.
# Main definitions
Note that for principal ideal domains, one should use
`[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]`. There is no explicit definition of a PID.
Theorems about PID's are in the `PrincipalIdealRing` namespace.
- `IsBezout`: the predicate saying that every finitely generated left ideal is principal.
- `generator`: a generator of a principal ideal (or more generally submodule)
- `to_uniqueFactorizationMonoid`: a PID is a unique factorization domain
# Main results
- `Ideal.IsPrime.to_maximal_ideal`: a non-zero prime ideal in a PID is maximal.
- `EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain` : a Euclidean domain is a PID.
- `IsBezout.nonemptyGCDMonoid`: Every Bézout domain is a GCD domain.
-/
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
open Set Function
open Submodule
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
instance bot_isPrincipal : (⊥ : Submodule R M).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
instance top_isPrincipal : (⊤ : Submodule R R).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨1, Ideal.span_singleton_one.symm⟩⟩
variable (R)
/-- A Bézout ring is a ring whose finitely generated ideals are principal. -/
class IsBezout : Prop where
/-- Any finitely generated ideal is principal. -/
isPrincipal_of_FG : ∀ I : Ideal R, I.FG → I.IsPrincipal
instance (priority := 100) IsBezout.of_isPrincipalIdealRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] : IsBezout R :=
⟨fun I _ => IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal I⟩
instance (priority := 100) DivisionRing.isPrincipalIdealRing (K : Type u) [DivisionRing K] :
IsPrincipalIdealRing K where
principal S := by
rcases Ideal.eq_bot_or_top S with (rfl | rfl)
· apply bot_isPrincipal
· apply top_isPrincipal
end
namespace Submodule.IsPrincipal
variable [AddCommMonoid M]
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Module R M]
/-- `generator I`, if `I` is a principal submodule, is an `x ∈ M` such that `span R {x} = I` -/
noncomputable def generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : M :=
Classical.choose (principal S)
theorem span_singleton_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : span R {generator S} = S :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal S))
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_generator (I : Ideal R) [I.IsPrincipal] :
Ideal.span ({generator I} : Set R) = I :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal I))
@[simp]
theorem generator_mem (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : generator S ∈ S := by
have : generator S ∈ span R {generator S} := subset_span (mem_singleton _)
convert this
exact span_singleton_generator S |>.symm
theorem mem_iff_eq_smul_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : M} :
x ∈ S ↔ ∃ s : R, x = s • generator S := by
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ x, ← mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_generator]
theorem eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
S = ⊥ ↔ generator S = 0 := by rw [← @span_singleton_eq_bot R M, span_singleton_generator]
protected lemma fg {S : Submodule R M} (h : S.IsPrincipal) : S.FG :=
⟨{h.generator}, by simp only [Finset.coe_singleton, span_singleton_generator]⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.PrincipalIdealRing.isNoetherianRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing R where
noetherian S := (IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal S).fg
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.IsPrincipalIdealRing.of_isNoetherianRing_of_isBezout
[IsNoetherianRing R] [IsBezout R] : IsPrincipalIdealRing R where
principal S := IsBezout.isPrincipal_of_FG S (IsNoetherian.noetherian S)
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [Module R M]
theorem associated_generator_span_self [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [IsDomain R] (r : R) :
Associated (generator <| Ideal.span {r}) r := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton]
exact Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
theorem mem_iff_generator_dvd (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : R} : x ∈ S ↔ generator S ∣ x :=
(mem_iff_eq_smul_generator S).trans (exists_congr fun a => by simp only [mul_comm, smul_eq_mul])
theorem prime_generator_of_isPrime (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] [is_prime : S.IsPrime]
(ne_bot : S ≠ ⊥) : Prime (generator S) :=
⟨fun h => ne_bot ((eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero S).2 h), fun h =>
is_prime.ne_top (S.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem (generator_mem S) h), fun _ _ => by
simpa only [← mem_iff_generator_dvd S] using is_prime.2⟩
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_map_dvd_of_mem {N : Submodule R M} (ϕ : M →ₗ[R] R) [(N.map ϕ).IsPrincipal] {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ N) : generator (N.map ϕ) ∣ ϕ x := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, Submodule.mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_submoduleImage_dvd_of_mem {N O : Submodule R M} (hNO : N ≤ O) (ϕ : O →ₗ[R] R)
[(ϕ.submoduleImage N).IsPrincipal] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ N) :
generator (ϕ.submoduleImage N) ∣ ϕ ⟨x, hNO hx⟩ := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, LinearMap.mem_submoduleImage_of_le hNO]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
end CommRing
end Submodule.IsPrincipal
namespace IsBezout
section
variable [Ring R]
instance span_pair_isPrincipal [IsBezout R] (x y : R) : (Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal := by
classical exact isPrincipal_of_FG (Ideal.span {x, y}) ⟨{x, y}, by simp⟩
variable (x y : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
/-- A choice of gcd of two elements in a Bézout domain.
Note that the choice is usually not unique. -/
noncomputable def gcd : R := Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator (Ideal.span {x, y})
theorem span_gcd : Ideal.span {gcd x y} = Ideal.span {x, y} :=
Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
end
variable [CommRing R] (x y z : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
theorem gcd_dvd_left : gcd x y ∣ x :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
theorem gcd_dvd_right : gcd x y ∣ y :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
variable {x y z} in
theorem dvd_gcd (hx : z ∣ x) (hy : z ∣ y) : z ∣ gcd x y := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton] at hx hy ⊢
rw [span_gcd, Ideal.span_insert, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem gcd_eq_sum : ∃ a b : R, a * x + b * y = gcd x y :=
Ideal.mem_span_pair.mp (by rw [← span_gcd]; apply Ideal.subset_span; simp)
variable {x y}
theorem _root_.IsRelPrime.isCoprime (h : IsRelPrime x y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [← Ideal.isCoprime_span_singleton_iff, Ideal.isCoprime_iff_sup_eq, ← Ideal.span_union,
Set.singleton_union, ← span_gcd, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
exact h (gcd_dvd_left x y) (gcd_dvd_right x y)
theorem _root_.isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime : IsRelPrime x y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨IsRelPrime.isCoprime, IsCoprime.isRelPrime⟩
variable (R)
/-- Any Bézout domain is a GCD domain. This is not an instance since `GCDMonoid` contains data,
and this might not be how we would like to construct it. -/
noncomputable def toGCDDomain [IsBezout R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] : GCDMonoid R :=
gcdMonoidOfGCD (gcd · ·) (gcd_dvd_left · ·) (gcd_dvd_right · ·) dvd_gcd
instance nonemptyGCDMonoid [IsBezout R] [IsDomain R] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid R) := by
classical exact ⟨toGCDDomain R⟩
theorem associated_gcd_gcd [IsDomain R] [GCDMonoid R] :
Associated (IsBezout.gcd x y) (GCDMonoid.gcd x y) :=
gcd_greatest_associated (gcd_dvd_left _ _ ) (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (fun _ => dvd_gcd)
end IsBezout
namespace IsPrime
open Submodule.IsPrincipal Ideal
-- TODO -- for a non-ID one could perhaps prove that if p < q are prime then q maximal;
-- 0 isn't prime in a non-ID PIR but the Krull dimension is still <= 1.
-- The below result follows from this, but we could also use the below result to
-- prove this (quotient out by p).
theorem to_maximal_ideal [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] {S : Ideal R}
[hpi : IsPrime S] (hS : S ≠ ⊥) : IsMaximal S :=
isMaximal_iff.2
⟨(ne_top_iff_one S).1 hpi.1, by
intro T x hST hxS hxT
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 (hST <| generator_mem S)
cases hpi.mem_or_mem (show generator T * z ∈ S from hz ▸ generator_mem S) with
| inl h =>
have hTS : T ≤ S := by
rwa [← T.span_singleton_generator, Ideal.span_le, singleton_subset_iff]
exact (hxS <| hTS hxT).elim
| inr h =>
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 h
have : generator S ≠ 0 := mt (eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).2 hS
rw [← mul_one (generator S), hy, mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' this] at hz
exact hz.symm ▸ T.mul_mem_right _ (generator_mem T)⟩
end IsPrime
section
open EuclideanDomain
variable [EuclideanDomain R]
theorem mod_mem_iff {S : Ideal R} {x y : R} (hy : y ∈ S) : x % y ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨fun hxy => div_add_mod x y ▸ S.add_mem (S.mul_mem_right _ hy) hxy, fun hx =>
(mod_eq_sub_mul_div x y).symm ▸ S.sub_mem hx (S.mul_mem_right _ hy)⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain : IsPrincipalIdealRing R where
principal S := by classical exact
⟨if h : { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 }.Nonempty then
have wf : WellFounded (EuclideanDomain.r : R → R → Prop) := EuclideanDomain.r_wellFounded
have hmin : WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ∈ S ∧
WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ≠ 0 :=
WellFounded.min_mem wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h
⟨WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h,
Submodule.ext fun x => ⟨fun hx =>
div_add_mod x (WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h) ▸
(Ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 <| dvd_add (dvd_mul_right _ _) <| by
have : x % WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ∉
{ x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } :=
fun h₁ => WellFounded.not_lt_min wf _ h h₁ (mod_lt x hmin.2)
have : x % WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h = 0 := by
simp only [not_and_or, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_ne_iff] at this
exact this.neg_resolve_left <| (mod_mem_iff hmin.1).2 hx
simp [*]),
fun hx =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := Ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 hx
hy.symm ▸ S.mul_mem_right _ hmin.1⟩⟩
else ⟨0, Submodule.ext fun a => by
rw [← @Submodule.bot_coe R R _ _ _, span_eq, Submodule.mem_bot]
exact ⟨fun haS => by_contra fun ha0 => h ⟨a, ⟨haS, ha0⟩⟩,
fun h₁ => h₁.symm ▸ S.zero_mem⟩⟩⟩
end
theorem IsField.isPrincipalIdealRing {R : Type*} [Ring R] (h : IsField R) :
IsPrincipalIdealRing R :=
@EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain R (@Field.toEuclideanDomain R h.toField)
namespace PrincipalIdealRing
open IsPrincipalIdealRing
theorem isMaximal_of_irreducible [CommSemiring R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] {p : R}
(hp : Irreducible p) : Ideal.IsMaximal (span R ({p} : Set R)) :=
⟨⟨mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.1 hp.1, fun I hI => by
rcases principal I with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
rcases Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton.1 (le_of_lt hI) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine (of_irreducible_mul hp).resolve_right (mt (fun hb => ?_) (not_le_of_lt hI))
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, Ideal.submodule_span_eq,
Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd hb]⟩⟩
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- `factors a` is a multiset of irreducible elements whose product is `a`, up to units -/
noncomputable def factors (a : R) : Multiset R :=
if h : a = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors a h)
theorem factors_spec (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) :
(∀ b ∈ factors a, Irreducible b) ∧ Associated (factors a).prod a := by
unfold factors; rw [dif_neg h]
exact Classical.choose_spec (WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors a h)
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_factors {R : Type v} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
{a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ∈ factors a) : b ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero ((factors_spec a ha).1 b hb)
theorem mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s : Submonoid R) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hfac : ∀ b ∈ factors a, b ∈ s) (hunit : ∀ c : Rˣ, (c : R) ∈ s) : a ∈ s := by
rcases (factors_spec a ha).2 with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc]
exact mul_mem (multiset_prod_mem _ hfac) (hunit _)
/-- If a `RingHom` maps all units and all factors of an element `a` into a submonoid `s`, then it
also maps `a` into that submonoid. -/
theorem ringHom_mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset {R S : Type*} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [NonAssocSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (s : Submonoid S)
(a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ∀ b ∈ factors a, f b ∈ s) (hf : ∀ c : Rˣ, f c ∈ s) : f a ∈ s :=
mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s.comap f.toMonoidHom) ha h hf
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A principal ideal domain has unique factorization -/
instance (priority := 100) to_uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid R :=
{ (IsNoetherianRing.wfDvdMonoid : WfDvdMonoid R) with
irreducible_iff_prime := irreducible_iff_prime }
end
end PrincipalIdealRing
section Surjective
open Submodule
variable {S N F : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [Ring S]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
theorem Submodule.IsPrincipal.map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {S : Submodule R M}
(hI : IsPrincipal S) : IsPrincipal (map f S) :=
⟨⟨f (IsPrincipal.generator S), by
rw [← Set.image_singleton, ← map_span, span_singleton_generator]⟩⟩
theorem Submodule.IsPrincipal.of_comap (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(S : Submodule R N) [hI : IsPrincipal (S.comap f)] : IsPrincipal S := by
rw [← Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf S]
exact hI.map f
theorem Submodule.IsPrincipal.map_ringHom (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
(hI : IsPrincipal I) : IsPrincipal (Ideal.map f I) :=
⟨⟨f (IsPrincipal.generator I), by
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ← Set.image_singleton, ← Ideal.map_span,
Ideal.span_singleton_generator]⟩⟩
theorem Ideal.IsPrincipal.of_comap (f : F) (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I : Ideal S)
[hI : IsPrincipal (I.comap f)] : IsPrincipal I := by
rw [← map_comap_of_surjective f hf I]
exact hI.map_ringHom f
/-- The surjective image of a principal ideal ring is again a principal ideal ring. -/
theorem IsPrincipalIdealRing.of_surjective [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : IsPrincipalIdealRing S :=
⟨fun I => Ideal.IsPrincipal.of_comap f hf I⟩
end Surjective
section
open Ideal
variable [CommRing R]
section Bezout
variable [IsBezout R]
|
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd (x y : R) (nonzero : ¬(x = 0 ∧ y = 0))
(H : ∀ z ∈ nonunits R, z ≠ 0 → z ∣ x → ¬z ∣ y) : IsCoprime x y :=
(isRelPrime_of_no_nonunits_factors nonzero H).isCoprime
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PrincipalIdealDomain.lean | 392 | 396 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm.Subperm
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with the factors of natural numbers.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.factors n`: the prime factorization of `n`
- `Nat.factors_unique`: uniqueness of the prime factorisation
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- `primeFactorsList n` is the prime factorization of `n`, listed in increasing order. -/
def primeFactorsList : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| 1 => []
| k + 2 =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
m :: primeFactorsList ((k + 2) / m)
decreasing_by exact factors_lemma
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_zero : primeFactorsList 0 = [] := by rw [primeFactorsList]
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_one : primeFactorsList 1 = [] := by rw [primeFactorsList]
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_two : primeFactorsList 2 = [2] := by simp [primeFactorsList]
theorem prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p ∈ primeFactorsList n → Prime p := by
match n with
| | 0 => simp
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factors.lean | 53 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Finset
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Star
/-!
# Topological sums and functorial constructions
Lemmas on the interaction of `tprod`, `tsum`, `HasProd`, `HasSum` etc with products, Sigma and Pi
types, `MulOpposite`, etc.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-! ## Product, Sigma and Pi types -/
section ProdDomain
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_pi_single [DecidableEq β] (b : β) (a : α) : HasProd (Pi.mulSingle b a) a := by
convert hasProd_ite_eq b a
simp [Pi.mulSingle_apply]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_pi_single [DecidableEq β] (b : β) (a : α) : ∏' b', Pi.mulSingle b a b' = a := by
rw [tprod_eq_mulSingle b]
· simp
· intro b' hb'; simp [hb']
@[to_additive tsum_setProd_singleton_left]
lemma tprod_setProd_singleton_left (b : β) (t : Set γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(∏' x : {b} ×ˢ t, f x) = ∏' c : t, f (b, c) := by
rw [tprod_congr_set_coe _ Set.singleton_prod, tprod_image _ (Prod.mk_right_injective b).injOn]
@[to_additive tsum_setProd_singleton_right]
lemma tprod_setProd_singleton_right (s : Set β) (c : γ) (f : β × γ → α) :
(∏' x : s ×ˢ {c}, f x) = ∏' b : s, f (b, c) := by
rw [tprod_congr_set_coe _ Set.prod_singleton, tprod_image _ (Prod.mk_left_injective c).injOn]
@[to_additive Summable.prod_symm]
theorem Multipliable.prod_symm {f : β × γ → α} (hf : Multipliable f) :
Multipliable fun p : γ × β ↦ f p.swap :=
(Equiv.prodComm γ β).multipliable_iff.2 hf
end ProdDomain
section ProdCodomain
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
@[to_additive HasSum.prodMk]
theorem HasProd.prodMk {f : β → α} {g : β → γ} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : HasProd f a)
(hg : HasProd g b) : HasProd (fun x ↦ (⟨f x, g x⟩ : α × γ)) ⟨a, b⟩ := by
simp [HasProd, ← prod_mk_prod, Filter.Tendsto.prodMk_nhds hf hg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias HasSum.prod_mk := HasSum.prodMk
@[to_additive existing HasSum.prodMk, deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias HasProd.prod_mk := HasProd.prodMk
end ProdCodomain
section ContinuousMul
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ContinuousMul α]
section Sum
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.sum {α β M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M]
{f : α ⊕ β → M} {a b : M}
(h₁ : HasProd (f ∘ Sum.inl) a) (h₂ : HasProd (f ∘ Sum.inr) b) : HasProd f (a * b) := by
have : Tendsto ((∏ b ∈ ·, f b) ∘ sumEquiv.symm) (atTop.map sumEquiv) (nhds (a * b)) := by
rw [Finset.sumEquiv.map_atTop, ← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
convert (tendsto_mul.comp (nhds_prod_eq (x := a) (y := b) ▸ Tendsto.prodMap h₁ h₂))
ext s
simp
simpa [Tendsto, ← Filter.map_map] using this
@[to_additive "For the statement that `tsum` commutes with `Finset.sum`,
see `Summable.tsum_finsetSum`."]
protected lemma Multipliable.tprod_sum {α β M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [T2Space M] {f : α ⊕ β → M} (h₁ : Multipliable (f ∘ .inl))
(h₂ : Multipliable (f ∘ .inr)) : ∏' i, f i = (∏' i, f (.inl i)) * (∏' i, f (.inr i)) :=
(h₁.hasProd.sum h₂.hasProd).tprod_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_sum := Summable.tsum_sum
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_sum :=
Multipliable.tprod_sum
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.sum {α β M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M]
(f : α ⊕ β → M) (h₁ : Multipliable (f ∘ Sum.inl)) (h₂ : Multipliable (f ∘ Sum.inr)) :
Multipliable f :=
⟨_, .sum h₁.hasProd h₂.hasProd⟩
end Sum
section RegularSpace
variable [RegularSpace α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.sigma {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σ b : β, γ b) → α} {g : β → α} {a : α}
(ha : HasProd f a) (hf : ∀ b, HasProd (fun c ↦ f ⟨b, c⟩) (g b)) : HasProd g a := by
classical
refine (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (closed_nhds_basis a)).mpr ?_
rintro s ⟨hs, hsc⟩
rcases mem_atTop_sets.mp (ha hs) with ⟨u, hu⟩
use u.image Sigma.fst, trivial
intro bs hbs
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Finset.le_iff_subset] at hu
have : Tendsto (fun t : Finset (Σ b, γ b) ↦ ∏ p ∈ t with p.1 ∈ bs, f p) atTop
(𝓝 <| ∏ b ∈ bs, g b) := by
simp only [← sigma_preimage_mk, prod_sigma]
refine tendsto_finset_prod _ fun b _ ↦ ?_
change
Tendsto (fun t ↦ (fun t ↦ ∏ s ∈ t, f ⟨b, s⟩) (preimage t (Sigma.mk b) _)) atTop (𝓝 (g b))
exact (hf b).comp (tendsto_finset_preimage_atTop_atTop (sigma_mk_injective))
refine hsc.mem_of_tendsto this (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨u, fun t ht ↦ hu _ fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩)
exact mem_filter.2 ⟨ht hx, hbs <| mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
/-- If a function `f` on `β × γ` has product `a` and for each `b` the restriction of `f` to
`{b} × γ` has product `g b`, then the function `g` has product `a`. -/
@[to_additive HasSum.prod_fiberwise "If a series `f` on `β × γ` has sum `a` and for each `b` the
restriction of `f` to `{b} × γ` has sum `g b`, then the series `g` has sum `a`."]
theorem HasProd.prod_fiberwise {f : β × γ → α} {g : β → α} {a : α} (ha : HasProd f a)
(hf : ∀ b, HasProd (fun c ↦ f (b, c)) (g b)) : HasProd g a :=
HasProd.sigma ((Equiv.sigmaEquivProd β γ).hasProd_iff.2 ha) hf
| @[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.sigma' {γ : β → Type*} {f : (Σ b : β, γ b) → α} (ha : Multipliable f)
(hf : ∀ b, Multipliable fun c ↦ f ⟨b, c⟩) : Multipliable fun b ↦ ∏' c, f ⟨b, c⟩ :=
(ha.hasProd.sigma fun b ↦ (hf b).hasProd).multipliable
end RegularSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Constructions.lean | 146 | 151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Order.RelSeries
/-!
# Jordan-Hölder Theorem
This file proves the Jordan Hölder theorem for a `JordanHolderLattice`, a class also defined in
this file. Examples of `JordanHolderLattice` include `Subgroup G` if `G` is a group, and
`Submodule R M` if `M` is an `R`-module. Using this approach the theorem need not be proved
separately for both groups and modules, the proof in this file can be applied to both.
## Main definitions
The main definitions in this file are `JordanHolderLattice` and `CompositionSeries`,
and the relation `Equivalent` on `CompositionSeries`
A `JordanHolderLattice` is the class for which the Jordan Hölder theorem is proved. A
Jordan Hölder lattice is a lattice equipped with a notion of maximality, `IsMaximal`, and a notion
of isomorphism of pairs `Iso`. In the example of subgroups of a group, `IsMaximal H K` means that
`H` is a maximal normal subgroup of `K`, and `Iso (H₁, K₁) (H₂, K₂)` means that the quotient
`H₁ / K₁` is isomorphic to the quotient `H₂ / K₂`. `Iso` must be symmetric and transitive and must
satisfy the second isomorphism theorem `Iso (H, H ⊔ K) (H ⊓ K, K)`.
A `CompositionSeries X` is a finite nonempty series of elements of the lattice `X` such that
each element is maximal inside the next. The length of a `CompositionSeries X` is
one less than the number of elements in the series. Note that there is no stipulation
that a series start from the bottom of the lattice and finish at the top.
For a composition series `s`, `s.last` is the largest element of the series,
and `s.head` is the least element.
Two `CompositionSeries X`, `s₁` and `s₂` are equivalent if there is a bijection
`e : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length` such that for any `i`,
`Iso (s₁ i, s₁ i.succ) (s₂ (e i), s₂ (e i.succ))`
## Main theorems
The main theorem is `CompositionSeries.jordan_holder`, which says that if two composition
series have the same least element and the same largest element,
then they are `Equivalent`.
## TODO
Provide instances of `JordanHolderLattice` for subgroups, and potentially for modular lattices.
It is not entirely clear how this should be done. Possibly there should be no global instances
of `JordanHolderLattice`, and the instances should only be defined locally in order to prove
the Jordan-Hölder theorem for modules/groups and the API should be transferred because many of the
theorems in this file will have stronger versions for modules. There will also need to be an API for
mapping composition series across homomorphisms. It is also probably possible to
provide an instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for any `ModularLattice`, and in this case the
Jordan-Hölder theorem will say that there is a well defined notion of length of a modular lattice.
However an instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for a modular lattice will not be able to contain
the correct notion of isomorphism for modules, so a separate instance for modules will still be
required and this will clash with the instance for modular lattices, and so at least one of these
instances should not be a global instance.
> [!NOTE]
> The previous paragraph indicates that the instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for submodules should
> be obtained via `ModularLattice`. This is not the case in `mathlib4`.
> See `JordanHolderModule.instJordanHolderLattice`.
-/
universe u
open Set RelSeries
/-- A `JordanHolderLattice` is the class for which the Jordan Hölder theorem is proved. A
Jordan Hölder lattice is a lattice equipped with a notion of maximality, `IsMaximal`, and a notion
of isomorphism of pairs `Iso`. In the example of subgroups of a group, `IsMaximal H K` means that
`H` is a maximal normal subgroup of `K`, and `Iso (H₁, K₁) (H₂, K₂)` means that the quotient
`H₁ / K₁` is isomorphic to the quotient `H₂ / K₂`. `Iso` must be symmetric and transitive and must
satisfy the second isomorphism theorem `Iso (H, H ⊔ K) (H ⊓ K, K)`.
Examples include `Subgroup G` if `G` is a group, and `Submodule R M` if `M` is an `R`-module.
-/
class JordanHolderLattice (X : Type u) [Lattice X] where
IsMaximal : X → X → Prop
lt_of_isMaximal : ∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x y → x < y
sup_eq_of_isMaximal : ∀ {x y z}, IsMaximal x z → IsMaximal y z → x ≠ y → x ⊔ y = z
isMaximal_inf_left_of_isMaximal_sup :
∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y) → IsMaximal y (x ⊔ y) → IsMaximal (x ⊓ y) x
Iso : X × X → X × X → Prop
iso_symm : ∀ {x y}, Iso x y → Iso y x
iso_trans : ∀ {x y z}, Iso x y → Iso y z → Iso x z
second_iso : ∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y) → Iso (x, x ⊔ y) (x ⊓ y, y)
namespace JordanHolderLattice
variable {X : Type u} [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X]
theorem isMaximal_inf_right_of_isMaximal_sup {x y : X} (hxz : IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y))
(hyz : IsMaximal y (x ⊔ y)) : IsMaximal (x ⊓ y) y := by
rw [inf_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at hxz hyz
exact isMaximal_inf_left_of_isMaximal_sup hyz hxz
theorem isMaximal_of_eq_inf (x b : X) {a y : X} (ha : x ⊓ y = a) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hxb : IsMaximal x b)
(hyb : IsMaximal y b) : IsMaximal a y := by
have hb : x ⊔ y = b := sup_eq_of_isMaximal hxb hyb hxy
substs a b
exact isMaximal_inf_right_of_isMaximal_sup hxb hyb
theorem second_iso_of_eq {x y a b : X} (hm : IsMaximal x a) (ha : x ⊔ y = a) (hb : x ⊓ y = b) :
Iso (x, a) (b, y) := by substs a b; exact second_iso hm
theorem IsMaximal.iso_refl {x y : X} (h : IsMaximal x y) : Iso (x, y) (x, y) :=
second_iso_of_eq h (sup_eq_right.2 (le_of_lt (lt_of_isMaximal h)))
(inf_eq_left.2 (le_of_lt (lt_of_isMaximal h)))
end JordanHolderLattice
open JordanHolderLattice
attribute [symm] iso_symm
attribute [trans] iso_trans
/-- A `CompositionSeries X` is a finite nonempty series of elements of a
`JordanHolderLattice` such that each element is maximal inside the next. The length of a
`CompositionSeries X` is one less than the number of elements in the series.
Note that there is no stipulation that a series start from the bottom of the lattice and finish at
the top. For a composition series `s`, `s.last` is the largest element of the series,
and `s.head` is the least element.
-/
abbrev CompositionSeries (X : Type u) [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X] : Type u :=
RelSeries (IsMaximal (X := X))
namespace CompositionSeries
variable {X : Type u} [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X]
theorem lt_succ (s : CompositionSeries X) (i : Fin s.length) :
s (Fin.castSucc i) < s (Fin.succ i) :=
lt_of_isMaximal (s.step _)
protected theorem strictMono (s : CompositionSeries X) : StrictMono s :=
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 s.lt_succ
protected theorem injective (s : CompositionSeries X) : Function.Injective s :=
s.strictMono.injective
@[simp]
protected theorem inj (s : CompositionSeries X) {i j : Fin s.length.succ} : s i = s j ↔ i = j :=
s.injective.eq_iff
theorem total {s : CompositionSeries X} {x y : X} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Set.mem_range.1 hx with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rcases Set.mem_range.1 hy with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [s.strictMono.le_iff_le, s.strictMono.le_iff_le]
exact le_total i j
theorem toList_sorted (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.toList.Sorted (· < ·) :=
List.pairwise_iff_get.2 fun i j h => by
dsimp only [RelSeries.toList]
rw [List.get_ofFn, List.get_ofFn]
exact s.strictMono h
theorem toList_nodup (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.toList.Nodup :=
s.toList_sorted.nodup
/-- Two `CompositionSeries` are equal if they have the same elements. See also `ext_fun`. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
toList_injective <|
List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted
(by
classical
exact List.perm_of_nodup_nodup_toFinset_eq s₁.toList_nodup s₂.toList_nodup
(Finset.ext <| by simpa only [List.mem_toFinset, RelSeries.mem_toList]))
s₁.toList_sorted s₂.toList_sorted
@[simp]
theorem le_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : s i ≤ s.last :=
s.strictMono.monotone (Fin.le_last _)
theorem le_last_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : x ≤ s.last :=
let ⟨_i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.2 hx
hi ▸ le_last _
@[simp]
theorem head_le {s : CompositionSeries X} (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : s.head ≤ s i :=
s.strictMono.monotone (Fin.zero_le _)
theorem head_le_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.head ≤ x :=
let ⟨_i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.2 hx
hi ▸ head_le _
theorem last_eraseLast_le (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.eraseLast.last ≤ s.last := by
simp [eraseLast, last, s.strictMono.le_iff_le, Fin.le_iff_val_le_val]
theorem mem_eraseLast_of_ne_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X}
(hx : x ≠ s.last) (hxs : x ∈ s) : x ∈ s.eraseLast := by
rcases hxs with ⟨i, rfl⟩
have hi : (i : ℕ) < (s.length - 1).succ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.succ_sub (length_pos_of_nontrivial ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, _, s.last_mem, hx⟩),
Nat.add_one_sub_one]
exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.2) (by simpa [last, s.inj, Fin.ext_iff] using hx)
refine ⟨Fin.castSucc (n := s.length + 1) i, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
theorem mem_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
x ∈ s.eraseLast ↔ x ≠ s.last ∧ x ∈ s := by
simp only [RelSeries.mem_def, eraseLast]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
have hi : (i : ℕ) < s.length := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one s.length, Nat.succ_sub h]
exact i.2
simp [last, Fin.ext_iff, ne_of_lt hi, -Set.mem_range, Set.mem_range_self]
· intro h
exact mem_eraseLast_of_ne_of_mem h.1 h.2
theorem lt_last_of_mem_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (h : 0 < s.length)
(hx : x ∈ s.eraseLast) : x < s.last :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (le_last_of_mem ((mem_eraseLast h).1 hx).2) ((mem_eraseLast h).1 hx).1
theorem isMaximal_eraseLast_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
IsMaximal s.eraseLast.last s.last := by
have : s.length - 1 + 1 = s.length := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one s.length]; rw [Nat.succ_sub h]
rw [last_eraseLast, last]
convert s.step ⟨s.length - 1, by omega⟩; ext; simp [this]
theorem eq_snoc_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
s = snoc (eraseLast s) s.last (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_snoc, mem_eraseLast h, ne_eq]
by_cases h : x = s.last <;> simp [*, s.last_mem]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_eraseLast_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : IsMaximal s.eraseLast.last s.last) :
s.eraseLast.snoc s.last h = s :=
have h : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (fun hs => ne_of_gt (lt_of_isMaximal h) <| by simp [last, Fin.ext_iff, hs])
(eq_snoc_eraseLast h).symm
/-- Two `CompositionSeries X`, `s₁` and `s₂` are equivalent if there is a bijection
`e : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length` such that for any `i`,
`Iso (s₁ i) (s₁ i.succ) (s₂ (e i), s₂ (e i.succ))` -/
def Equivalent (s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X) : Prop :=
∃ f : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length,
∀ i : Fin s₁.length, Iso (s₁ (Fin.castSucc i), s₁ i.succ)
(s₂ (Fin.castSucc (f i)), s₂ (Fin.succ (f i)))
namespace Equivalent
@[refl]
theorem refl (s : CompositionSeries X) : Equivalent s s :=
⟨Equiv.refl _, fun _ => (s.step _).iso_refl⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : Equivalent s₁ s₂) : Equivalent s₂ s₁ :=
⟨h.choose.symm, fun i => iso_symm (by simpa using h.choose_spec (h.choose.symm i))⟩
@[trans]
theorem trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : CompositionSeries X} (h₁ : Equivalent s₁ s₂) (h₂ : Equivalent s₂ s₃) :
Equivalent s₁ s₃ :=
⟨h₁.choose.trans h₂.choose,
fun i => iso_trans (h₁.choose_spec i) (h₂.choose_spec (h₁.choose i))⟩
protected theorem smash {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hs : s₁.last = s₂.head) (ht : t₁.last = t₂.head)
(h₁ : Equivalent s₁ t₁) (h₂ : Equivalent s₂ t₂) :
Equivalent (smash s₁ s₂ hs) (smash t₁ t₂ ht) :=
let e : Fin (s₁.length + s₂.length) ≃ Fin (t₁.length + t₂.length) :=
calc
Fin (s₁.length + s₂.length) ≃ (Fin s₁.length) ⊕ (Fin s₂.length) := finSumFinEquiv.symm
_ ≃ (Fin t₁.length) ⊕ (Fin t₂.length) := Equiv.sumCongr h₁.choose h₂.choose
_ ≃ Fin (t₁.length + t₂.length) := finSumFinEquiv
⟨e, by
intro i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i
· intro i
simpa [e, smash_castAdd, smash_succ_castAdd] using h₁.choose_spec i
· intro i
simpa [e, smash_natAdd, smash_succ_natAdd] using h₂.choose_spec i⟩
protected theorem snoc {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} {x₁ x₂ : X} {hsat₁ : IsMaximal s₁.last x₁}
{hsat₂ : IsMaximal s₂.last x₂} (hequiv : Equivalent s₁ s₂)
(hlast : Iso (s₁.last, x₁) (s₂.last, x₂)) : Equivalent (s₁.snoc x₁ hsat₁) (s₂.snoc x₂ hsat₂) :=
let e : Fin s₁.length.succ ≃ Fin s₂.length.succ :=
calc
Fin (s₁.length + 1) ≃ Option (Fin s₁.length) := finSuccEquivLast
_ ≃ Option (Fin s₂.length) := Functor.mapEquiv Option hequiv.choose
_ ≃ Fin (s₂.length + 1) := finSuccEquivLast.symm
⟨e, fun i => by
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ ?_ i
· simpa [e, apply_last] using hlast
· intro i
simpa [e, Fin.succ_castSucc] using hequiv.choose_spec i⟩
theorem length_eq {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : Equivalent s₁ s₂) : s₁.length = s₂.length := by
simpa using Fintype.card_congr h.choose
theorem snoc_snoc_swap {s : CompositionSeries X} {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : X} {hsat₁ : IsMaximal s.last x₁}
{hsat₂ : IsMaximal s.last x₂} {hsaty₁ : IsMaximal (snoc s x₁ hsat₁).last y₁}
{hsaty₂ : IsMaximal (snoc s x₂ hsat₂).last y₂} (hr₁ : Iso (s.last, x₁) (x₂, y₂))
(hr₂ : Iso (x₁, y₁) (s.last, x₂)) :
Equivalent (snoc (snoc s x₁ hsat₁) y₁ hsaty₁) (snoc (snoc s x₂ hsat₂) y₂ hsaty₂) :=
let e : Fin (s.length + 1 + 1) ≃ Fin (s.length + 1 + 1) :=
Equiv.swap (Fin.last _) (Fin.castSucc (Fin.last _))
have h1 : ∀ {i : Fin s.length},
(Fin.castSucc (Fin.castSucc i)) ≠ (Fin.castSucc (Fin.last _)) := by simp
have h2 : ∀ {i : Fin s.length}, (Fin.castSucc (Fin.castSucc i)) ≠ Fin.last _ := by simp
⟨e, by
intro i
dsimp only [e]
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_left, snoc_castSucc,
show (snoc s x₁ hsat₁).toFun (Fin.last _) = x₁ from last_snoc _ _ _, Fin.succ_last,
show ((s.snoc x₁ hsat₁).snoc y₁ hsaty₁).toFun (Fin.last _) = y₁ from last_snoc _ _ _,
snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_last,
show (s.snoc _ hsat₂).toFun (Fin.last _) = x₂ from last_snoc _ _ _]
exact hr₂
· refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_right, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_last, last_snoc', last_snoc', last_snoc']
exact hr₁
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h2 h1, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
exact (s.step i).iso_refl⟩
end Equivalent
theorem length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero
{s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (hb : s₁.head = s₂.head)
(ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) (hs₁ : s₁.length = 0) : s₂.length = 0 := by
have : Fin.last s₂.length = (0 : Fin s₂.length.succ) :=
s₂.injective (hb.symm.trans ((congr_arg s₁ (Fin.ext (by simp [hs₁]))).trans ht)).symm
simpa [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem length_pos_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_pos {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) : 0 < s₁.length → 0 < s₂.length :=
not_imp_not.1
(by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, Decidable.not_not] using
length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb.symm ht.symm)
theorem eq_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) (hs₁0 : s₁.length = 0) : s₁ = s₂ := by
have : ∀ x, x ∈ s₁ ↔ x = s₁.last := fun x =>
⟨fun hx => subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs₁0 hx s₁.last_mem, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ s₁.last_mem⟩
have : ∀ x, x ∈ s₂ ↔ x = s₂.last := fun x =>
⟨fun hx =>
subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero
(length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb ht
hs₁0) hx s₂.last_mem,
fun hx => hx.symm ▸ s₂.last_mem⟩
ext
simp [*]
/-- Given a `CompositionSeries`, `s`, and an element `x`
such that `x` is maximal inside `s.last` there is a series, `t`,
such that `t.last = x`, `t.head = s.head`
and `snoc t s.last _` is equivalent to `s`. -/
theorem exists_last_eq_snoc_equivalent (s : CompositionSeries X) (x : X) (hm : IsMaximal x s.last)
(hb : s.head ≤ x) :
∃ t : CompositionSeries X,
t.head = s.head ∧ t.length + 1 = s.length ∧
∃ htx : t.last = x,
Equivalent s (snoc t s.last (show IsMaximal t.last _ from htx.symm ▸ hm)) := by
induction' hn : s.length with n ih generalizing s x
· exact
(ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt hb (lt_of_isMaximal hm))
(subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hn s.last_mem s.head_mem)).elim
· have h0s : 0 < s.length := hn.symm ▸ Nat.succ_pos _
by_cases hetx : s.eraseLast.last = x
· use s.eraseLast
simp [← hetx, hn, Equivalent.refl]
· have imxs : IsMaximal (x ⊓ s.eraseLast.last) s.eraseLast.last :=
isMaximal_of_eq_inf x s.last rfl (Ne.symm hetx) hm (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)
have := ih _ _ imxs (le_inf (by simpa) (le_last_of_mem s.eraseLast.head_mem)) (by simp [hn])
rcases this with ⟨t, htb, htl, htt, hteqv⟩
have hmtx : IsMaximal t.last x :=
isMaximal_of_eq_inf s.eraseLast.last s.last (by rw [inf_comm, htt]) hetx
(isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) hm
use snoc t x hmtx
refine ⟨by simp [htb], by simp [htl], by simp, ?_⟩
have : s.Equivalent ((snoc t s.eraseLast.last <| show IsMaximal t.last _ from
htt.symm ▸ imxs).snoc s.last
(by simpa using isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)) := by
conv_lhs => rw [eq_snoc_eraseLast h0s]
exact Equivalent.snoc hteqv (by simpa using (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s).iso_refl)
refine this.trans <| Equivalent.snoc_snoc_swap
(iso_symm
(second_iso_of_eq hm
(sup_eq_of_isMaximal hm (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) (Ne.symm hetx)) htt.symm))
(second_iso_of_eq (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)
(sup_eq_of_isMaximal (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) hm hetx) (by rw [inf_comm, htt]))
/-- The **Jordan-Hölder** theorem, stated for any `JordanHolderLattice`.
If two composition series start and finish at the same place, they are equivalent. -/
theorem jordan_holder (s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X)
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) :
Equivalent s₁ s₂ := by
induction' hle : s₁.length with n ih generalizing s₁ s₂
· rw [eq_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb ht hle]
· have h0s₂ : 0 < s₂.length :=
length_pos_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_pos hb ht (hle.symm ▸ Nat.succ_pos _)
rcases exists_last_eq_snoc_equivalent s₁ s₂.eraseLast.last
(ht.symm ▸ isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s₂)
(hb.symm ▸ s₂.head_eraseLast ▸ head_le_of_mem (last_mem _)) with
⟨t, htb, htl, htt, hteq⟩
have := ih t s₂.eraseLast (by simp [htb, ← hb]) htt (Nat.succ_inj.1 (htl.trans hle))
refine hteq.trans ?_
conv_rhs => rw [eq_snoc_eraseLast h0s₂]
simp only [ht]
exact Equivalent.snoc this (by simpa [htt] using (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s₂).iso_refl)
end CompositionSeries
| Mathlib/Order/JordanHolder.lean | 432 | 437 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sigma
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice.Finset
/-!
# Finite sets in a sigma type
This file defines a few `Finset` constructions on `Σ i, α i`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sigma`: Given a finset `s` in `ι` and finsets `t i` in each `α i`, `s.sigma t` is the
finset of the dependent sum `Σ i, α i`
* `Finset.sigmaLift`: Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map
`Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`.
## TODO
`Finset.sigmaLift` can be generalized to any alternative functor. But to make the generalization
worth it, we must first refactor the functor library so that the `alternative` instance for `Finset`
is computable and universe-polymorphic.
-/
open Function Multiset
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sigma
variable {α : ι → Type*} {β : Type*} (s s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (t t₁ t₂ : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
/-- `s.sigma t` is the finset of dependent pairs `⟨i, a⟩` such that `i ∈ s` and `a ∈ t i`. -/
protected def sigma : Finset (Σ i, α i) :=
⟨_, s.nodup.sigma fun i => (t i).nodup⟩
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sigma {a : Σ i, α i} : a ∈ s.sigma t ↔ a.1 ∈ s ∧ a.2 ∈ t a.1 :=
Multiset.mem_sigma
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
(s.sigma t : Set (Σ i, α i)) = (s : Set ι).sigma fun i ↦ (t i : Set (α i)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sigma
@[simp]
theorem sigma_nonempty : (s.sigma t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, (t i).Nonempty := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.sigma_nonempty_of_exists_nonempty⟩ := sigma_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem sigma_eq_empty : s.sigma t = ∅ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, t i = ∅ := by
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, sigma_nonempty, not_exists, not_and]
@[mono]
theorem sigma_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : ∀ i, t₁ i ⊆ t₂ i) : s₁.sigma t₁ ⊆ s₂.sigma t₂ :=
fun ⟨i, _⟩ h =>
let ⟨hi, ha⟩ := mem_sigma.1 h
mem_sigma.2 ⟨hs hi, ht i ha⟩
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk :
(s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i) := by
intro i _ j _ hij
rw [Function.onFun, disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
rintro _ ⟨y, _, rfl⟩ ⟨z, _, hz'⟩
exact hij (congr_arg Sigma.fst hz'.symm)
@[simp]
theorem disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk :
s.disjiUnion (fun i => (t i).map (Embedding.sigmaMk i)) pairwiseDisjoint_map_sigmaMk =
s.sigma t :=
rfl
theorem sigma_eq_biUnion [DecidableEq (Σ i, α i)] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i)) :
s.sigma t = s.biUnion fun i => (t i).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk i := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm]
variable (s t) (f : (Σ i, α i) → β)
theorem sup_sigma [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] :
(s.sigma t).sup f = s.sup fun i => (t i).sup fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_sigma, and_imp, Sigma.forall]
exact
⟨fun i a hi ha => (le_sup hi).trans' <| le_sup (f := fun a => f ⟨i, a⟩) ha, fun i hi a ha =>
le_sup <| mem_sigma.2 ⟨hi, ha⟩⟩
theorem inf_sigma [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] :
(s.sigma t).inf f = s.inf fun i => (t i).inf fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩ :=
@sup_sigma _ _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem _root_.biSup_finsetSigma [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → β) : ⨆ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⨆ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f ⟨i, j⟩ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.iSup_coe, Finset.coe_sigma, biSup_sigma]
theorem _root_.biSup_finsetSigma' [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → β) : ⨆ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f i j = ⨆ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
Eq.symm (biSup_finsetSigma _ _ _)
theorem _root_.biInf_finsetSigma [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → β) : ⨅ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⨅ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biSup_finsetSigma (β := βᵒᵈ) _ _ _
theorem _root_.biInf_finsetSigma' [CompleteLattice β] (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → β) : ⨅ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t i), f i j = ⨅ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
Eq.symm (biInf_finsetSigma _ _ _)
theorem _root_.Set.biUnion_finsetSigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → Set β) : ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j ∈ t i, f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biSup_finsetSigma _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biUnion_finsetSigma' (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → Set β) : ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j ∈ t i, f i j = ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.fst ij.snd :=
biSup_finsetSigma' _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biInter_finsetSigma (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : Sigma α → Set β) : ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij = ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j ∈ t i, f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
biInf_finsetSigma _ _ _
theorem _root_.Set.biInter_finsetSigma' (s : Finset ι) (t : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
(f : ∀ i, α i → Set β) : ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j ∈ t i, f i j = ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma t, f ij.1 ij.2 :=
biInf_finsetSigma' _ _ _
end Sigma
section SigmaLift
variable {α β γ : ι → Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Lifts maps `α i → β i → Finset (γ i)` to a map `Σ i, α i → Σ i, β i → Finset (Σ i, γ i)`. -/
def sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β) :
Finset (Sigma γ) :=
dite (a.1 = b.1) (fun h => (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk _) fun _ => ∅
theorem mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β)
(x : Sigma γ) :
x ∈ sigmaLift f a b ↔ ∃ (ha : a.1 = x.1) (hb : b.1 = x.1), x.2 ∈ f (ha ▸ a.2) (hb ▸ b.2) := by
obtain ⟨⟨i, a⟩, j, b⟩ := a, b
obtain rfl | h := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· constructor
· simp_rw [sigmaLift]
simp only [dite_eq_ite, ite_true, mem_map, Embedding.sigmaMk_apply, forall_exists_index,
and_imp]
rintro x hx rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, hx⟩
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
exact ⟨_, hx, by simp [Sigma.ext_iff]⟩
· rw [sigmaLift, dif_neg h]
refine iff_of_false (not_mem_empty _) ?_
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, _⟩
exact h rfl
theorem mk_mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (i : ι) (a : α i) (b : β i)
(x : γ i) : (⟨i, x⟩ : Sigma γ) ∈ sigmaLift f ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ x ∈ f a b := by
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx, _, rfl⟩
exact hx
theorem not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_left (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α)
(b : Sigma β) (x : Sigma γ) (h : a.1 ≠ x.1) : x ∉ sigmaLift f a b := by
rw [mem_sigmaLift]
exact fun H => h H.fst
theorem not_mem_sigmaLift_of_ne_right (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) {a : Sigma α}
(b : Sigma β) {x : Sigma γ} (h : b.1 ≠ x.1) : x ∉ sigmaLift f a b := by
rw [mem_sigmaLift]
exact fun H => h H.snd.fst
variable {f g : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)} {a : Σ i, α i} {b : Σ i, β i}
theorem sigmaLift_nonempty :
(sigmaLift f a b).Nonempty ↔ ∃ h : a.1 = b.1, (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).Nonempty := by
simp_rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sigmaLift]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem sigmaLift_eq_empty : sigmaLift f a b = ∅ ↔ ∀ h : a.1 = b.1, f (h ▸ a.2) b.2 = ∅ := by
simp_rw [sigmaLift]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, forall_prop_of_true h]
· simp [h, forall_prop_of_false h]
theorem sigmaLift_mono
(h : ∀ ⦃i⦄ ⦃a : α i⦄ ⦃b : β i⦄, f a b ⊆ g a b) (a : Σ i, α i) (b : Σ i, β i) :
sigmaLift f a b ⊆ sigmaLift g a b := by
| rintro x hx
rw [mem_sigmaLift] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨ha, hb, hx⟩ := hx
exact ⟨ha, hb, h hx⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sigma.lean | 198 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Subspace
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.Banach
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
/-!
# Symmetric linear maps in an inner product space
This file defines and proves basic theorems about symmetric **not necessarily bounded** operators
on an inner product space, i.e linear maps `T : E → E` such that `∀ x y, ⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫`.
In comparison to `IsSelfAdjoint`, this definition works for non-continuous linear maps, and
doesn't rely on the definition of the adjoint, which allows it to be stated in non-complete space.
## Main definitions
* `LinearMap.IsSymmetric`: a (not necessarily bounded) operator on an inner product space is
symmetric, if for all `x`, `y`, we have `⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫`
## Main statements
* `IsSymmetric.continuous`: if a symmetric operator is defined on a complete space, then
it is automatically continuous.
## Tags
self-adjoint, symmetric
-/
open RCLike
open ComplexConjugate
section Seminormed
variable {𝕜 E : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
namespace LinearMap
/-! ### Symmetric operators -/
/-- A (not necessarily bounded) operator on an inner product space is symmetric, if for all
`x`, `y`, we have `⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫`. -/
def IsSymmetric (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : Prop :=
∀ x y, ⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫
section Real
/-- An operator `T` on an inner product space is symmetric if and only if it is
`LinearMap.IsSelfAdjoint` with respect to the sesquilinear form given by the inner product. -/
theorem isSymmetric_iff_sesqForm (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
T.IsSymmetric ↔ LinearMap.IsSelfAdjoint (R := 𝕜) (M := E) sesqFormOfInner T :=
⟨fun h x y => (h y x).symm, fun h x y => (h y x).symm⟩
end Real
theorem IsSymmetric.conj_inner_sym {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric T) (x y : E) :
conj ⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪T y, x⟫ := by rw [hT x y, inner_conj_symm]
@[simp]
theorem IsSymmetric.apply_clm {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E)) (x y : E) :
⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫ :=
hT x y
@[simp]
protected theorem IsSymmetric.zero : (0 : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := fun x y =>
(inner_zero_right x : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0).symm ▸ (inner_zero_left y : ⟪0, y⟫ = 0)
@[simp]
protected theorem IsSymmetric.id : (LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := fun _ _ => rfl
@[aesop safe apply]
theorem IsSymmetric.add {T S : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) (hS : S.IsSymmetric) :
(T + S).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw [add_apply, inner_add_left, hT x y, hS x y, ← inner_add_right, add_apply]
@[aesop safe apply]
theorem IsSymmetric.sub {T S : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) (hS : S.IsSymmetric) :
(T - S).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw [sub_apply, inner_sub_left, hT x y, hS x y, ← inner_sub_right, sub_apply]
@[aesop safe apply]
theorem IsSymmetric.smul {c : 𝕜} (hc : conj c = c) {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) :
c • T |>.IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
simp only [smul_apply, inner_smul_left, hc, hT x y, inner_smul_right]
@[aesop 30% apply]
lemma IsSymmetric.mul_of_commute {S T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hS : S.IsSymmetric) (hT : T.IsSymmetric)
(hST : Commute S T) : (S * T).IsSymmetric :=
fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Module.End.mul_apply, hS, hT, hST, Module.End.mul_apply]
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma IsSymmetric.pow {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) (n : ℕ) : (T ^ n).IsSymmetric := by
refine Nat.le_induction (by simp [Module.End.one_eq_id]) (fun k _ ih ↦ ?_) n n.zero_le
rw [Module.End.iterate_succ, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
exact ih.mul_of_commute hT <| .pow_left rfl k
/-- For a symmetric operator `T`, the function `fun x ↦ ⟪T x, x⟫` is real-valued. -/
@[simp]
theorem IsSymmetric.coe_reApplyInnerSelf_apply {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E))
(x : E) : (T.reApplyInnerSelf x : 𝕜) = ⟪T x, x⟫ := by
rsuffices ⟨r, hr⟩ : ∃ r : ℝ, ⟪T x, x⟫ = r
· simp [hr, T.reApplyInnerSelf_apply]
rw [← conj_eq_iff_real]
exact hT.conj_inner_sym x x
/-- If a symmetric operator preserves a submodule, its restriction to that submodule is
symmetric. -/
theorem IsSymmetric.restrict_invariant {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric T) {V : Submodule 𝕜 E}
(hV : ∀ v ∈ V, T v ∈ V) : IsSymmetric (T.restrict hV) := fun v w => hT v w
theorem IsSymmetric.restrictScalars {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) :
letI := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E := RestrictScalars.isScalarTower _ _ _
(T.restrictScalars ℝ).IsSymmetric :=
fun x y => by simp [hT x y, real_inner_eq_re_inner, LinearMap.coe_restrictScalars ℝ]
section Complex
variable {V : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℂ V]
attribute [local simp] map_ofNat in -- use `ofNat` simp theorem with bad keys
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
/-- A linear operator on a complex inner product space is symmetric precisely when
`⟪T v, v⟫_ℂ` is real for all v. -/
theorem isSymmetric_iff_inner_map_self_real (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) :
IsSymmetric T ↔ ∀ v : V, conj ⟪T v, v⟫_ℂ = ⟪T v, v⟫_ℂ := by
constructor
· intro hT v
apply IsSymmetric.conj_inner_sym hT
· intro h x y
rw [← inner_conj_symm x (T y)]
rw [inner_map_polarization T x y]
simp only [starRingEnd_apply, star_div₀, star_sub, star_add, star_mul]
simp only [← starRingEnd_apply]
rw [h (x + y), h (x - y), h (x + Complex.I • y), h (x - Complex.I • y)]
simp only [Complex.conj_I]
rw [inner_map_polarization']
norm_num
ring
end Complex
/-- Polarization identity for symmetric linear maps.
See `inner_map_polarization` for the complex version without the symmetric assumption. -/
theorem IsSymmetric.inner_map_polarization {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) (x y : E) :
⟪T x, y⟫ =
(⟪T (x + y), x + y⟫ - ⟪T (x - y), x - y⟫ - I * ⟪T (x + (I : 𝕜) • y), x + (I : 𝕜) • y⟫ +
I * ⟪T (x - (I : 𝕜) • y), x - (I : 𝕜) • y⟫) /
4 := by
| rcases@I_mul_I_ax 𝕜 _ with (h | h)
· simp_rw [h, zero_mul, sub_zero, add_zero, map_add, map_sub, inner_add_left,
inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, hT x, ← inner_conj_symm x (T y)]
suffices (re ⟪T y, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪T y, x⟫ by
rw [conj_eq_iff_re.mpr this]
ring
rw [← re_add_im ⟪T y, x⟫]
simp_rw [h, mul_zero, add_zero]
norm_cast
· simp_rw [map_add, map_sub, inner_add_left, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right,
LinearMap.map_smul, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, RCLike.conj_I, mul_add, mul_sub,
sub_sub, ← mul_assoc, mul_neg, h, neg_neg, one_mul, neg_one_mul]
ring
end LinearMap
end Seminormed
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Symmetric.lean | 163 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- An isomorphism is an open immersion. -/
instance ofIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (H : X ≅ Y) : IsOpenImmersion H.hom where
base_open := (TopCat.homeoOfIso ((forget C).mapIso H)).isOpenEmbedding
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` will fail if Lean is not told that `H.hom.c` is iso
c_iso _ := letI : IsIso H.hom.c := c_isIso_of_iso H.hom; inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) ofIsIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsOpenImmersion f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso (asIso f)
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : PresheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) where
base_open := hf
c_iso U := by
dsimp
have : (Opens.map f).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) = U := by
ext1
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective
convert_to IsIso (Y.presheaf.map (𝟙 _))
· congr
· -- Porting note: was `apply Subsingleton.helim; rw [this]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
congr
· simp only [unop_op]
congr
apply Subsingleton.helim
rw [this]
· infer_instance
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : PresheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ := by
delta invApp
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
change X.presheaf.map _ = X.presheaf.map _
congr 1
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
have : ∀ (U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ), IsIso (f.c.app U) := by
intro U
have : U = op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj (unop U))) := by
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq _ ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')).symm
convert H.c_iso (Opens.map f.base |>.obj <| unop U)
have : IsIso f.c := NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app _
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) isIso_of_components
let t : X ≃ₜ Y := H.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := Subtype.val
invFun := fun x =>
⟨x, by rw [Set.range_eq_univ.mpr ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')]; trivial⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl }
exact (TopCat.isoOfHomeo t).isIso_hom
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
infer_instance
end
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- (Implementation.) The projection map when constructing the pullback along an open immersion.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftFst :
Y.restrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base) ⟶ X where
base := pullback.fst _ _
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
hf.invApp _ (unop U) ≫
g.c.app (op (hf.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj (unop U))) ≫
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
simp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, unop_op, op_inj_iff, Opens.map,
Subtype.coe_mk, Functor.op_obj]
apply LE.le.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype _ _).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h₂⟩
-- Porting note: need a slight hand holding
-- used to be `simpa using h₁` before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
change _ ∈ _ ⁻¹' _ ∧ _
simp only [TopCat.coe_of, restrict_carrier, Set.preimage_id', Set.mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· change _ ∈ U.unop at h₁
convert h₁
rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
· rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
· rintro _ ⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, h₁, CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩))
naturality := by
intro U V i
induction U
induction V
-- Note: this doesn't fire in `simp` because of reduction of the term via structure eta
-- before discrimination tree key generation
rw [inv_naturality_assoc]
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
rfl }
theorem pullback_cone_of_left_condition : pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ ≫ g := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun U => ?_
· simpa using pullback.condition
· induction U
-- Porting note: `NatTrans.comp_app` is not picked up by `dsimp`
-- Perhaps see : https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op, whiskerRight_app, pullbackConeOfLeftFst]
-- simp only [ofRestrict_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app]
simp only [app_invApp_assoc,
eqToHom_app, Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
erw [← Y.presheaf.map_comp, ← Y.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
/-- We construct the pullback along an open immersion via restricting along the pullback of the
maps of underlying spaces (which is also an open embedding).
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g) (Y.ofRestrict _)
(pullback_cone_of_left_condition f g)
variable (s : PullbackCone f g)
/-- (Implementation.) Any cone over `cospan f g` indeed factors through the constructed cone.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftLift : s.pt ⟶ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).pt where
base :=
pullback.lift s.fst.base s.snd.base
(congr_arg (fun x => PresheafedSpace.Hom.base x) s.condition)
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
s.snd.c.app _ ≫
s.pt.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
dsimp only [Opens.map, IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op]
congr 2
let s' : PullbackCone f.base g.base := PullbackCone.mk s.fst.base s.snd.base
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this is just an underscore
(congr_arg Hom.base s.condition)
have : _ = s.snd.base := limit.lift_π s' WalkingCospan.right
conv_lhs =>
rw [← this]
dsimp [s']
rw [Function.comp_def, ← Set.preimage_preimage]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _
(TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base).injective]
rfl))
naturality := fun U V i => by
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1 }
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).fst = s.fst := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = _
simp
· induction x with | op x => ?_
change ((_ ≫ _) ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
have := congr_app s.condition (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj x))
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op] at this
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
replace this := reassoc_of% this
erw [← this, hf.invApp_app_assoc, s.fst.c.naturality_assoc]
simp [eqToHom_map]
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd = s.snd := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = _
simp
· change (_ ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
trans s.snd.c.app x ≫ s.pt.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
instance pullbackConeSndIsOpenImmersion : IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd := by
erw [CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd]
infer_instance
/-- The constructed pullback cone is indeed the pullback. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s
intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans (pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackSndOfLeft : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackFstOfRight : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullbackToBaseIsOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfLeft : PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (forget C) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g)
(by
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan _) _).toFun
refine (IsLimit.equivIsoLimit ?_).toFun (limit.isLimit (cospan f.base g.base))
fapply Cones.ext
· exact Iso.refl _
change ∀ j, _ = 𝟙 _ ≫ _ ≫ _
simp_rw [Category.id_comp]
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> symm
· erw [Category.comp_id]
exact limit.w (cospan f.base g.base) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
· exact Category.comp_id _
· exact Category.comp_id _)
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfRight : PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry (forget C) f g
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
haveI := TopCat.snd_iso_of_left_embedding_range_subset hf.base_open.isEmbedding g.base H
have : IsIso (pullback.snd f g).base := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
change IsIso (_ ≫ pullback.snd _ _)
infer_instance
apply to_iso
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
haveI := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
/-- Two open immersions with equal range is isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfRangeEq [IsOpenImmersion g] (e : Set.range f.base = Set.range g.base) : X ≅ Y where
hom := lift g f (le_of_eq e)
inv := lift f g (le_of_eq e.symm)
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cancel_mono f]; simp
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp
end Pullback
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
section ToSheafedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace C} (Y : SheafedSpace C)
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toSheafedSpace (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] : SheafedSpace C where
IsSheaf := by
apply TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_of_iso (sheafIsoOfIso (isoRestrict f).symm).symm
apply TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf
exact (Y.restrict H.base_open).IsSheaf
toPresheafedSpace := X
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpace_toPresheafedSpace : (toSheafedSpace Y f).toPresheafedSpace = X :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of SheafedSpaces.
-/
def toSheafedSpaceHom : toSheafedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_base : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).base = f.base :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_c : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).c = f.c :=
rfl
instance toSheafedSpace_isOpenImmersion : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem sheafedSpace_toSheafedSpace {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
toSheafedSpace Y f = X := by cases X; rfl
|
end ToSheafedSpace
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 548 | 549 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Combinators
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Util.CompileInductive
import Aesop
/-!
# Option of a type
This file develops the basic theory of option types.
If `α` is a type, then `Option α` can be understood as the type with one more element than `α`.
`Option α` has terms `some a`, where `a : α`, and `none`, which is the added element.
This is useful in multiple ways:
* It is the prototype of addition of terms to a type. See for example `WithBot α` which uses
`none` as an element smaller than all others.
* It can be used to define failsafe partial functions, which return `some the_result_we_expect`
if we can find `the_result_we_expect`, and `none` if there is no meaningful result. This forces
any subsequent use of the partial function to explicitly deal with the exceptions that make it
return `none`.
* `Option` is a monad. We love monads.
`Part` is an alternative to `Option` that can be seen as the type of `True`/`False` values
along with a term `a : α` if the value is `True`.
-/
universe u
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
theorem coe_def : (fun a ↦ ↑a : α → Option α) = some :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {y : β} {o : Option α} : y ∈ o.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, f x = y := by simp
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Option.mem_def`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `H` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {o : Option α} :
f a ∈ o.map f ↔ a ∈ o := by
aesop
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
theorem coe_get {o : Option α} (h : o.isSome) : ((Option.get _ h : α) : Option α) = o :=
Option.some_get h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem {a : α} {o1 o2 : Option α} (h1 : a ∈ o1) (h2 : a ∈ o2) : o1 = o2 :=
h1.trans h2.symm
theorem Mem.leftUnique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Option α → Prop) :=
fun _ _ _=> mem_unique
theorem some_injective (α : Type*) : Function.Injective (@some α) := fun _ _ ↦ some_inj.mp
/-- `Option.map f` is injective if `f` is injective. -/
theorem map_injective {f : α → β} (Hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (Option.map f)
| none, none, _ => rfl
| some a₁, some a₂, H => by rw [Hf (Option.some.inj H)]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_some (f : α → β) : Option.map f ∘ some = some ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem none_bind' (f : α → Option β) : none.bind f = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem some_bind' (a : α) (f : α → Option β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
rfl
theorem bind_eq_some' {x : Option α} {f : α → Option β} {b : β} :
x.bind f = some b ↔ ∃ a, x = some a ∧ f a = some b := by
cases x <;> simp
@[congr]
theorem bind_congr' {f g : α → Option β} {x y : Option α} (hx : x = y)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ y, f a = g a) : x.bind f = y.bind g :=
hx.symm ▸ bind_congr hf
@[deprecated bind_congr (since := "2025-03-20")]
-- This was renamed from `bind_congr` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7529
-- upstreamed it with a slightly different statement.
theorem bind_congr'' {f g : α → Option β} {x : Option α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ x, f a = g a) : x.bind f = x.bind g := by
cases x <;> simp only [some_bind, none_bind, mem_def, h]
theorem joinM_eq_join : joinM = @join α :=
funext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem bind_eq_bind' {α β : Type u} {f : α → Option β} {x : Option α} : x >>= f = x.bind f :=
rfl
theorem map_coe {α β} {a : α} {f : α → β} : f <$> (a : Option α) = ↑(f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe' {a : α} {f : α → β} : Option.map f (a : Option α) = ↑(f a) :=
rfl
/-- `Option.map` as a function between functions is injective. -/
theorem map_injective' : Function.Injective (@Option.map α β) := fun f g h ↦
funext fun x ↦ some_injective _ <| by simp only [← map_some', h]
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {f g : α → β} : Option.map f = Option.map g ↔ f = g :=
map_injective'.eq_iff
attribute [simp] map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_id {f : α → α} : Option.map f = id ↔ f = id :=
map_injective'.eq_iff' map_id
theorem map_comm {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {g₁ : β → δ} {g₂ : γ → δ} (h : g₁ ∘ f₁ = g₂ ∘ f₂)
(a : α) :
(Option.map f₁ a).map g₁ = (Option.map f₂ a).map g₂ := by rw [map_map, h, ← map_map]
section pmap
variable {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a : α, p a → β) (x : Option α)
@[simp]
theorem pbind_eq_bind (f : α → Option β) (x : Option α) : (x.pbind fun a _ ↦ f a) = x.bind f := by
cases x <;> simp only [pbind, none_bind', some_bind']
theorem map_bind' (f : β → γ) (x : Option α) (g : α → Option β) :
Option.map f (x.bind g) = x.bind fun a ↦ Option.map f (g a) := by cases x <;> simp
theorem pbind_map (f : α → β) (x : Option α) (g : ∀ b : β, b ∈ x.map f → Option γ) :
pbind (Option.map f x) g = x.pbind fun a h ↦ g (f a) (mem_map_of_mem _ h) := by cases x <;> rfl
theorem mem_pmem {a : α} (h : ∀ a ∈ x, p a) (ha : a ∈ x) : f a (h a ha) ∈ pmap f x h := by
rw [mem_def] at ha ⊢
subst ha
rfl
theorem pmap_bind {α β γ} {x : Option α} {g : α → Option β} {p : β → Prop} {f : ∀ b, p b → γ} (H)
(H' : ∀ (a : α), ∀ b ∈ g a, b ∈ x >>= g) :
pmap f (x >>= g) H = x >>= fun a ↦ pmap f (g a) fun _ h ↦ H _ (H' a _ h) := by
cases x <;> simp only [pmap, bind_eq_bind, none_bind, some_bind]
theorem bind_pmap {α β γ} {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (x : Option α) (g : β → Option γ) (H) :
pmap f x H >>= g = x.pbind fun a h ↦ g (f a (H _ h)) := by
cases x <;> simp only [pmap, bind_eq_bind, none_bind, some_bind, pbind]
variable {f x}
theorem pbind_eq_none {f : ∀ a : α, a ∈ x → Option β}
(h' : ∀ a (H : a ∈ x), f a H = none → x = none) : x.pbind f = none ↔ x = none := by
cases x
· simp
· simp only [pbind, iff_false, reduceCtorEq]
intro h
cases h' _ rfl h
theorem pbind_eq_some {f : ∀ a : α, a ∈ x → Option β} {y : β} :
x.pbind f = some y ↔ ∃ (z : α) (H : z ∈ x), f z H = some y := by
rcases x with (_|x)
· simp
· simp only [pbind]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨x, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, H, hz⟩
| simp only [mem_def, Option.some_inj] at H
simpa [H] using hz
| Mathlib/Data/Option/Basic.lean | 180 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Monoidal
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories
This file defines rigid (autonomous) monoidal categories and the necessary theory about
exact pairings and duals.
## Main definitions
* `ExactPairing` of two objects of a monoidal category
* Type classes `HasLeftDual` and `HasRightDual` that capture that a pairing exists
* The `rightAdjointMate f` as a morphism `fᘁ : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ` for a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
* The classes of `RightRigidCategory`, `LeftRigidCategory` and `RigidCategory`
## Main statements
* `comp_rightAdjointMate`: The adjoint mates of the composition is the composition of
adjoint mates.
## Notations
* `η_` and `ε_` denote the coevaluation and evaluation morphism of an exact pairing.
* `Xᘁ` and `ᘁX` denote the right and left dual of an object, as well as the adjoint
mate of a morphism.
## Future work
* Show that `X ⊗ Y` and `Yᘁ ⊗ Xᘁ` form an exact pairing.
* Show that the left adjoint mate of the right adjoint mate of a morphism is the morphism itself.
* Simplify constructions in the case where a symmetry or braiding is present.
* Show that `ᘁ` gives an equivalence of categories `C ≅ (Cᵒᵖ)ᴹᵒᵖ`.
* Define pivotal categories (rigid categories equipped with a natural isomorphism `ᘁᘁ ≅ 𝟙 C`).
## Notes
Although we construct the adjunction `tensorLeft Y ⊣ tensorLeft X` from `ExactPairing X Y`,
this is not a bijective correspondence.
I think the correct statement is that `tensorLeft Y` and `tensorLeft X` are
module endofunctors of `C` as a right `C` module category,
and `ExactPairing X Y` is in bijection with adjunctions compatible with this right `C` action.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rigid+monoidal+category>
## Tags
rigid category, monoidal category
-/
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- An exact pairing is a pair of objects `X Y : C` which admit
a coevaluation and evaluation morphism which fulfill two triangle equalities. -/
class ExactPairing (X Y : C) where
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.coevaluation` instead. -/
coevaluation' : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing.
Do not use directly. Use `ExactPairing.evaluation` instead. -/
evaluation' : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C
coevaluation_evaluation' :
Y ◁ coevaluation' ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ evaluation' ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
aesop_cat
evaluation_coevaluation' :
coevaluation' ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ evaluation' = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv := by
aesop_cat
namespace ExactPairing
-- Porting note: as there is no mechanism equivalent to `[]` in Lean 3 to make
-- arguments for class fields explicit,
-- we now repeat all the fields without primes.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Making.20variable.20in.20class.20field.20explicit
variable (X Y : C)
variable [ExactPairing X Y]
/-- Coevaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def coevaluation : 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⊗ Y := @coevaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
/-- Evaluation of an exact pairing. -/
def evaluation : Y ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C := @evaluation' _ _ _ X Y _
@[inherit_doc] notation "η_" => ExactPairing.coevaluation
@[inherit_doc] notation "ε_" => ExactPairing.evaluation
lemma coevaluation_evaluation :
Y ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ X _ ▷ Y = (ρ_ Y).hom ≫ (λ_ Y).inv :=
coevaluation_evaluation'
lemma evaluation_coevaluation :
η_ _ _ ▷ X ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ X ◁ ε_ _ Y = (λ_ X).hom ≫ (ρ_ X).inv :=
evaluation_coevaluation'
lemma coevaluation_evaluation'' :
Y ◁ η_ X Y ⊗≫ ε_ X Y ▷ Y = ⊗𝟙.hom := by
convert coevaluation_evaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
lemma evaluation_coevaluation'' :
η_ X Y ▷ X ⊗≫ X ◁ ε_ X Y = ⊗𝟙.hom := by
convert evaluation_coevaluation X Y <;> simp [monoidalComp]
end ExactPairing
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.coevaluation_evaluation
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ExactPairing.evaluation_coevaluation
instance exactPairingUnit : ExactPairing (𝟙_ C) (𝟙_ C) where
coevaluation' := (ρ_ _).inv
evaluation' := (ρ_ _).hom
coevaluation_evaluation' := by monoidal_coherence
evaluation_coevaluation' := by monoidal_coherence
/-- A class of objects which have a right dual. -/
class HasRightDual (X : C) where
/-- The right dual of the object `X`. -/
rightDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing X rightDual]
/-- A class of objects which have a left dual. -/
class HasLeftDual (Y : C) where
/-- The left dual of the object `X`. -/
leftDual : C
[exact : ExactPairing leftDual Y]
attribute [instance] HasRightDual.exact
attribute [instance] HasLeftDual.exact
open ExactPairing HasRightDual HasLeftDual MonoidalCategory
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4596
The overlapping notation for `leftDual` and `leftAdjointMate` become more problematic in
after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4596, and we sometimes have to disambiguate with
e.g. `(ᘁX : C)` where previously just `ᘁX` was enough. -/
@[inherit_doc] prefix:1024 "ᘁ" => leftDual
@[inherit_doc] postfix:1024 "ᘁ" => rightDual
instance hasRightDualUnit : HasRightDual (𝟙_ C) where
rightDual := 𝟙_ C
instance hasLeftDualUnit : HasLeftDual (𝟙_ C) where
leftDual := 𝟙_ C
instance hasRightDualLeftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : HasRightDual ᘁX where
rightDual := X
instance hasLeftDualRightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : HasLeftDual Xᘁ where
leftDual := X
@[simp]
theorem leftDual_rightDual {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : ᘁXᘁ = X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightDual_leftDual {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁX)ᘁ = X :=
rfl
/-- The right adjoint mate `fᘁ : Xᘁ ⟶ Yᘁ` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Yᘁ ⟶ Xᘁ :=
(ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ _ ◁ f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
/-- The left adjoint mate `ᘁf : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX` of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def leftAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) : ᘁY ⟶ ᘁX :=
(λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ _ ≫ (_ ◁ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
@[inherit_doc] notation f "ᘁ" => rightAdjointMate f
@[inherit_doc] notation "ᘁ" f => leftAdjointMate f
@[simp]
theorem rightAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasRightDual X] : (𝟙 X)ᘁ = 𝟙 (Xᘁ) := by
simp [rightAdjointMate]
@[simp]
theorem leftAdjointMate_id {X : C} [HasLeftDual X] : (ᘁ(𝟙 X)) = 𝟙 (ᘁX) := by
simp [leftAdjointMate]
theorem rightAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Xᘁ ⟶ Z} :
fᘁ ≫ g =
(ρ_ (Yᘁ)).inv ≫
_ ◁ η_ X (Xᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ (Yᘁ) Y Z).inv ≫ ε_ Y (Yᘁ) ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ Z).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Yᘁ : C) ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ g) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [rightAdjointMate]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def]; monoidal
theorem leftAdjointMate_comp {X Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : (ᘁX) ⟶ Z} :
(ᘁf) ≫ g =
(λ_ _).inv ≫
η_ (ᘁX : C) X ▷ _ ≫ (g ⊗ f) ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ η_ (ᘁX : C) X ▷ (ᘁY) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ▷ (ᘁY) ⊗≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ g ▷ 𝟙_ C) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [leftAdjointMate]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [whisker_exchange, tensorHom_def']; monoidal
/-- The composition of right adjoint mates is the adjoint mate of the composition. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_rightAdjointMate {X Y Z : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] [HasRightDual Z]
{f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : (f ≫ g)ᘁ = gᘁ ≫ fᘁ := by
rw [rightAdjointMate_comp]
simp only [rightAdjointMate, comp_whiskerRight]
simp only [← Category.assoc]; congr 3; simp only [Category.assoc]
simp only [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]; congr 2
symm
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (Y ⊗ Yᘁ) ◁ η_ X Xᘁ) ⊗≫ Y ◁ Yᘁ ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫
Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [tensorHom_def']; monoidal
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ (X ⊗ Xᘁ) ≫ (Y ⊗ Yᘁ) ◁ f ▷ Xᘁ) ⊗≫
Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ f ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Yᘁ ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Yᘁ) ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ g ▷ Xᘁ ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ X Xᘁ ≫ f ▷ Xᘁ ≫ g ▷ Xᘁ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
/-- The composition of left adjoint mates is the adjoint mate of the composition. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_leftAdjointMate {X Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] [HasLeftDual Z] {f : X ⟶ Y}
{g : Y ⟶ Z} : (ᘁf ≫ g) = (ᘁg) ≫ ᘁf := by
rw [leftAdjointMate_comp]
simp only [leftAdjointMate, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
simp only [← Category.assoc]; congr 3; simp only [Category.assoc]
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight]; congr 2
symm
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ ((𝟙_ C) ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ η_ (ᘁX) X ▷ ((ᘁY) ⊗ Y)) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ▷ (ᘁY) ▷ Y ⊗≫
(ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [tensorHom_def]; monoidal
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ⊗≫ (((ᘁX) ⊗ X) ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ f) ▷ ((ᘁY) ⊗ Y)) ⊗≫
(ᘁX) ◁ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ⊗≫ ((ᘁX) ◁ f) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ (Y ◁ η_ (ᘁY) Y ⊗≫ ε_ (ᘁY) Y ▷ Y) ⊗≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = η_ (ᘁX) X ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ g := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
/-- Given an exact pairing on `Y Y'`,
we get a bijection on hom-sets `(Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)`
by "pulling the string on the left" up or down.
This gives the adjunction `tensorLeftAdjunction Y Y' : tensorLeft Y' ⊣ tensorLeft Y`.
This adjunction is often referred to as "Frobenius reciprocity" in the
fusion categories / planar algebras / subfactors literature.
-/
def tensorLeftHomEquiv (X Y Y' Z : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : (Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) where
toFun f := (λ_ _).inv ≫ η_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ f
invFun f := Y' ◁ f ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ε_ _ _ ▷ _ ≫ (λ_ _).hom
left_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ▷ X ⊗≫ ((Y' ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ▷ X ⊗≫ f := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
right_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ Y Y' ▷ X ≫ (Y ⊗ Y') ◁ f) ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ▷ Z ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
/-- Given an exact pairing on `Y Y'`,
we get a bijection on hom-sets `(X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y')`
by "pulling the string on the right" up or down.
-/
def tensorRightHomEquiv (X Y Y' Z : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : (X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z) ≃ (X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y') where
toFun f := (ρ_ _).inv ≫ _ ◁ η_ _ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ f ▷ _
invFun f := f ▷ _ ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ _ ◁ ε_ _ _ ≫ (ρ_ _).hom
left_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ X ◁ η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ (f ▷ (Y' ⊗ Y) ≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ X ◁ (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
right_inv f := by
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ η_ Y Y' ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Y')) ⊗≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y' ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ Z ◁ (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = f := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality {X Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : Y' ⊗ X ⟶ Z)
(g : Z ⟶ Z') :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z') (f ≫ g) = (tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z) f ≫ Y ◁ g := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality {X X' Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ X')
(g : X' ⟶ Y ⊗ Z) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm (f ≫ g) =
_ ◁ f ≫ (tensorLeftHomEquiv X' Y Y' Z).symm g := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality {X Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⊗ Y ⟶ Z)
(g : Z ⟶ Z') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z') (f ≫ g) = (tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z) f ≫ g ▷ Y' := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality {X X' Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ X')
(g : X' ⟶ Z ⊗ Y') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm (f ≫ g) =
f ▷ Y ≫ (tensorRightHomEquiv X' Y Y' Z).symm g := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv]
/-- If `Y Y'` have an exact pairing,
then the functor `tensorLeft Y'` is left adjoint to `tensorLeft Y`.
-/
def tensorLeftAdjunction (Y Y' : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : tensorLeft Y' ⊣ tensorLeft Y :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Z => tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z
homEquiv_naturality_left_symm := fun f g => tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_naturality f g
homEquiv_naturality_right := fun f g => tensorLeftHomEquiv_naturality f g }
/-- If `Y Y'` have an exact pairing,
then the functor `tensor_right Y` is left adjoint to `tensor_right Y'`.
-/
def tensorRightAdjunction (Y Y' : C) [ExactPairing Y Y'] : tensorRight Y ⊣ tensorRight Y' :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun X Z => tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z
homEquiv_naturality_left_symm := fun f g => tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_naturality f g
homEquiv_naturality_right := fun f g => tensorRightHomEquiv_naturality f g }
/--
If `Y` has a left dual `ᘁY`, then it is a closed object, with the internal hom functor `Y ⟶[C] -`
given by left tensoring by `ᘁY`.
This has to be a definition rather than an instance to avoid diamonds, for example between
`category_theory.monoidal_closed.functor_closed` and
`CategoryTheory.Monoidal.functorHasLeftDual`. Moreover, in concrete applications there is often
a more useful definition of the internal hom object than `ᘁY ⊗ X`, in which case the closed
structure shouldn't come from `has_left_dual` (e.g. in the category `FinVect k`, it is more
convenient to define the internal hom as `Y →ₗ[k] X` rather than `ᘁY ⊗ X` even though these are
naturally isomorphic).
-/
def closedOfHasLeftDual (Y : C) [HasLeftDual Y] : Closed Y where
rightAdj := tensorLeft (ᘁY)
adj := tensorLeftAdjunction (ᘁY) Y
/-- `tensorLeftHomEquiv` commutes with tensoring on the right -/
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_tensor {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)
(g : X' ⟶ Z') :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv (X ⊗ X') Y Y' (Z ⊗ Z')).symm ((f ⊗ g) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom) =
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((tensorLeftHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, tensorHom_def']
/-- `tensorRightHomEquiv` commutes with tensoring on the left -/
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_tensor {X X' Y Y' Z Z' : C} [ExactPairing Y Y'] (f : X ⟶ Z ⊗ Y')
(g : X' ⟶ Z') :
(tensorRightHomEquiv (X' ⊗ X) Y Y' (Z' ⊗ Z)).symm ((g ⊗ f) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv) =
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (g ⊗ (tensorRightHomEquiv X Y Y' Z).symm f) := by
simp [tensorRightHomEquiv, tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft {Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y']
(f : Y' ⟶ Z) : (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _).symm (η_ _ _ ≫ Y ◁ f) = (ρ_ _).hom ≫ f := by
calc
_ = Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ((Y' ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Z) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = (Y' ◁ η_ Y Y' ⊗≫ ε_ Y Y' ▷ Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X]
[HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _).symm (η_ _ _ ≫ f ▷ (Xᘁ)) = (ρ_ _).hom ≫ fᘁ := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, rightAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X]
[HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(tensorRightHomEquiv _ (ᘁY) _ _).symm (η_ (ᘁX : C) X ≫ (ᘁX : C) ◁ f) = (λ_ _).hom ≫ ᘁf := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv, leftAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_symm_coevaluation_comp_whiskerRight {Y Y' Z : C} [ExactPairing Y Y']
(f : Y ⟶ Z) : (tensorRightHomEquiv _ Y _ _).symm (η_ Y Y' ≫ f ▷ Y') = (λ_ _).hom ≫ f :=
calc
_ = η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ (f ▷ (Y' ⊗ Y) ≫ Z ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = (η_ Y Y' ▷ Y ⊗≫ Y ◁ ε_ Y Y') ⊗≫ f := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation {Y Z : C} [HasLeftDual Z] (f : Y ⟶ ᘁZ) :
(tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (Z ◁ f ≫ ε_ _ _) = f ≫ (ρ_ _).inv :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ (ᘁZ : C) Z ▷ Y ≫ ((ᘁZ) ⊗ Z) ◁ f) ⊗≫ (ᘁZ) ◁ ε_ (ᘁZ) Z := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ (η_ (ᘁZ) Z ▷ (ᘁZ) ⊗≫ (ᘁZ) ◁ ε_ (ᘁZ) Z) := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
@[simp]
theorem tensorLeftHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (f ▷ _ ≫ ε_ _ _) = (ᘁf) ≫ (ρ_ _).inv := by
dsimp [tensorLeftHomEquiv, leftAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerLeft_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (tensorRightHomEquiv _ _ _ _) ((Yᘁ : C) ◁ f ≫ ε_ _ _) = fᘁ ≫ (λ_ _).inv := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv, rightAdjointMate]
simp
@[simp]
theorem tensorRightHomEquiv_whiskerRight_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] (f : Y ⟶ Xᘁ) :
(tensorRightHomEquiv _ _ _ _) (f ▷ X ≫ ε_ X (Xᘁ)) = f ≫ (λ_ _).inv :=
calc
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (Y ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ≫ f ▷ (X ⊗ Xᘁ)) ⊗≫ ε_ X Xᘁ ▷ Xᘁ := by
dsimp [tensorRightHomEquiv]; monoidal
_ = f ⊗≫ (Xᘁ ◁ η_ X Xᘁ ⊗≫ ε_ X Xᘁ ▷ Xᘁ) := by
rw [whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = _ := by
rw [coevaluation_evaluation'']; monoidal
-- Next four lemmas passing `fᘁ` or `ᘁf` through (co)evaluations.
@[reassoc]
theorem coevaluation_comp_rightAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
η_ Y (Yᘁ) ≫ _ ◁ (fᘁ) = η_ _ _ ≫ f ▷ _ := by
apply_fun (tensorLeftHomEquiv _ Y (Yᘁ) _).symm
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftAdjointMate_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
X ◁ (ᘁf) ≫ ε_ _ _ = f ▷ _ ≫ ε_ _ _ := by
apply_fun tensorLeftHomEquiv _ (ᘁX) X _
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem coevaluation_comp_leftAdjointMate {X Y : C} [HasLeftDual X] [HasLeftDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
η_ (ᘁY) Y ≫ (ᘁf) ▷ Y = η_ (ᘁX) X ≫ (ᘁX) ◁ f := by
apply_fun (tensorRightHomEquiv _ (ᘁY) Y _).symm
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem rightAdjointMate_comp_evaluation {X Y : C} [HasRightDual X] [HasRightDual Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(fᘁ ▷ X) ≫ ε_ X (Xᘁ) = ((Yᘁ) ◁ f) ≫ ε_ Y (Yᘁ) := by
apply_fun tensorRightHomEquiv _ X (Xᘁ) _
simp
/-- Transport an exact pairing across an isomorphism in the first argument. -/
def exactPairingCongrLeft {X X' Y : C} [ExactPairing X' Y] (i : X ≅ X') : ExactPairing X Y where
evaluation' := Y ◁ i.hom ≫ ε_ _ _
coevaluation' := η_ _ _ ≫ i.inv ▷ Y
evaluation_coevaluation' :=
calc
_ = η_ X' Y ▷ X ⊗≫ (i.inv ▷ (Y ⊗ X) ≫ X ◁ (Y ◁ i.hom)) ⊗≫ X ◁ ε_ X' Y := by
monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (η_ X' Y ▷ X ≫ (X' ⊗ Y) ◁ i.hom) ⊗≫
(i.inv ▷ (Y ⊗ X') ≫ X ◁ ε_ X' Y) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
| _ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ i.hom ⊗≫ (η_ X' Y ▷ X' ⊗≫ X' ◁ ε_ X' Y) ⊗≫ i.inv ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← whisker_exchange, ← whisker_exchange]; monoidal
_ = 𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (i.hom ≫ i.inv) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [evaluation_coevaluation'']; monoidal
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Rigid/Basic.lean | 489 | 492 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
| setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 498 | 506 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- An isomorphism is an open immersion. -/
instance ofIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (H : X ≅ Y) : IsOpenImmersion H.hom where
base_open := (TopCat.homeoOfIso ((forget C).mapIso H)).isOpenEmbedding
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` will fail if Lean is not told that `H.hom.c` is iso
c_iso _ := letI : IsIso H.hom.c := c_isIso_of_iso H.hom; inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) ofIsIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsOpenImmersion f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso (asIso f)
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : PresheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) where
base_open := hf
c_iso U := by
dsimp
have : (Opens.map f).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) = U := by
ext1
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective
convert_to IsIso (Y.presheaf.map (𝟙 _))
· congr
· -- Porting note: was `apply Subsingleton.helim; rw [this]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
congr
· simp only [unop_op]
congr
apply Subsingleton.helim
rw [this]
· infer_instance
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : PresheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ := by
delta invApp
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
change X.presheaf.map _ = X.presheaf.map _
congr 1
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
have : ∀ (U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ), IsIso (f.c.app U) := by
intro U
have : U = op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj (unop U))) := by
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq _ ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')).symm
convert H.c_iso (Opens.map f.base |>.obj <| unop U)
have : IsIso f.c := NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app _
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) isIso_of_components
let t : X ≃ₜ Y := H.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := Subtype.val
invFun := fun x =>
⟨x, by rw [Set.range_eq_univ.mpr ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')]; trivial⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl }
exact (TopCat.isoOfHomeo t).isIso_hom
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
infer_instance
end
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- (Implementation.) The projection map when constructing the pullback along an open immersion.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftFst :
Y.restrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base) ⟶ X where
base := pullback.fst _ _
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
hf.invApp _ (unop U) ≫
g.c.app (op (hf.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj (unop U))) ≫
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
simp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, unop_op, op_inj_iff, Opens.map,
Subtype.coe_mk, Functor.op_obj]
apply LE.le.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype _ _).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h₂⟩
-- Porting note: need a slight hand holding
-- used to be `simpa using h₁` before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
change _ ∈ _ ⁻¹' _ ∧ _
simp only [TopCat.coe_of, restrict_carrier, Set.preimage_id', Set.mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· change _ ∈ U.unop at h₁
convert h₁
rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
· rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
· rintro _ ⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, h₁, CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩))
naturality := by
intro U V i
induction U
induction V
-- Note: this doesn't fire in `simp` because of reduction of the term via structure eta
-- before discrimination tree key generation
rw [inv_naturality_assoc]
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
rfl }
theorem pullback_cone_of_left_condition : pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ ≫ g := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun U => ?_
· simpa using pullback.condition
· induction U
-- Porting note: `NatTrans.comp_app` is not picked up by `dsimp`
-- Perhaps see : https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op, whiskerRight_app, pullbackConeOfLeftFst]
-- simp only [ofRestrict_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app]
simp only [app_invApp_assoc,
eqToHom_app, Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
erw [← Y.presheaf.map_comp, ← Y.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
/-- We construct the pullback along an open immersion via restricting along the pullback of the
maps of underlying spaces (which is also an open embedding).
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g) (Y.ofRestrict _)
(pullback_cone_of_left_condition f g)
variable (s : PullbackCone f g)
/-- (Implementation.) Any cone over `cospan f g` indeed factors through the constructed cone.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftLift : s.pt ⟶ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).pt where
base :=
pullback.lift s.fst.base s.snd.base
(congr_arg (fun x => PresheafedSpace.Hom.base x) s.condition)
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
s.snd.c.app _ ≫
s.pt.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
dsimp only [Opens.map, IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op]
congr 2
let s' : PullbackCone f.base g.base := PullbackCone.mk s.fst.base s.snd.base
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this is just an underscore
(congr_arg Hom.base s.condition)
have : _ = s.snd.base := limit.lift_π s' WalkingCospan.right
conv_lhs =>
rw [← this]
dsimp [s']
rw [Function.comp_def, ← Set.preimage_preimage]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _
(TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base).injective]
rfl))
naturality := fun U V i => by
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1 }
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).fst = s.fst := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = _
simp
· induction x with | op x => ?_
change ((_ ≫ _) ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
have := congr_app s.condition (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj x))
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op] at this
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
replace this := reassoc_of% this
erw [← this, hf.invApp_app_assoc, s.fst.c.naturality_assoc]
simp [eqToHom_map]
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd = s.snd := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = _
simp
· change (_ ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
trans s.snd.c.app x ≫ s.pt.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
instance pullbackConeSndIsOpenImmersion : IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd := by
erw [CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd]
infer_instance
/-- The constructed pullback cone is indeed the pullback. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s
intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans (pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackSndOfLeft : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackFstOfRight : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullbackToBaseIsOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfLeft : PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (forget C) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g)
(by
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan _) _).toFun
refine (IsLimit.equivIsoLimit ?_).toFun (limit.isLimit (cospan f.base g.base))
fapply Cones.ext
· exact Iso.refl _
change ∀ j, _ = 𝟙 _ ≫ _ ≫ _
simp_rw [Category.id_comp]
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> symm
· erw [Category.comp_id]
exact limit.w (cospan f.base g.base) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
· exact Category.comp_id _
· exact Category.comp_id _)
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfRight : PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry (forget C) f g
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
haveI := TopCat.snd_iso_of_left_embedding_range_subset hf.base_open.isEmbedding g.base H
have : IsIso (pullback.snd f g).base := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
change IsIso (_ ≫ pullback.snd _ _)
infer_instance
apply to_iso
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
haveI := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
/-- Two open immersions with equal range is isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfRangeEq [IsOpenImmersion g] (e : Set.range f.base = Set.range g.base) : X ≅ Y where
hom := lift g f (le_of_eq e)
inv := lift f g (le_of_eq e.symm)
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cancel_mono f]; simp
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp
end Pullback
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
section ToSheafedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace C} (Y : SheafedSpace C)
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toSheafedSpace (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] : SheafedSpace C where
IsSheaf := by
apply TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_of_iso (sheafIsoOfIso (isoRestrict f).symm).symm
apply TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf
exact (Y.restrict H.base_open).IsSheaf
toPresheafedSpace := X
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpace_toPresheafedSpace : (toSheafedSpace Y f).toPresheafedSpace = X :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of SheafedSpaces.
-/
def toSheafedSpaceHom : toSheafedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_base : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).base = f.base :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_c : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).c = f.c :=
rfl
instance toSheafedSpace_isOpenImmersion : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem sheafedSpace_toSheafedSpace {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
toSheafedSpace Y f = X := by cases X; rfl
end ToSheafedSpace
section ToLocallyRingedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace CommRingCat} (Y : LocallyRingedSpace)
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a LocallyRingedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toLocallyRingedSpace : LocallyRingedSpace where
toSheafedSpace := toSheafedSpace Y.toSheafedSpace f
isLocalRing x :=
haveI : IsLocalRing (Y.presheaf.stalk (f.base x)) := Y.isLocalRing _
(asIso (f.stalkMap x)).commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.isLocalRing
@[simp]
theorem toLocallyRingedSpace_toSheafedSpace :
(toLocallyRingedSpace Y f).toSheafedSpace = toSheafedSpace Y.1 f :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a LocallyRingedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of LocallyRingedSpace.
-/
def toLocallyRingedSpaceHom : toLocallyRingedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
⟨f, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
@[simp]
theorem toLocallyRingedSpaceHom_val : (toLocallyRingedSpaceHom Y f).toShHom = f :=
rfl
instance toLocallyRingedSpace_isOpenImmersion :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toLocallyRingedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem locallyRingedSpace_toLocallyRingedSpace {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] : toLocallyRingedSpace Y f.1 = X := by
cases X; delta toLocallyRingedSpace; simp
end ToLocallyRingedSpace
theorem isIso_of_subset {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] (U : Opens Y.carrier)
(hU : (U : Set Y.carrier) ⊆ Set.range f.base) : IsIso (f.c.app <| op U) := by
have : U = H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) := by
ext1
exact (Set.inter_eq_left.mpr hU).symm.trans Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range.symm
convert H.c_iso ((Opens.map f.base).obj U)
end PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
instance (priority := 100) of_isIso {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
@PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIsIso _ _ _ _ f
(SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_isIso _)
instance comp {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
[SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f g
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [H : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this local notation is often followed by a space to avoid confusion
-- with the forgetful functor, now it is often wrapped in a parenthesis
local notation "forget" => SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
instance : Mono f :=
(forget).mono_of_mono_map (show @Mono (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ f by infer_instance)
instance forgetMapIsOpenImmersion : PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((forget).map f) :=
⟨H.base_open, H.c_iso⟩
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_left : HasLimit (cospan f g ⋙ forget) := by
have : HasLimit (cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) := by
change HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map f) ((forget).map g))
infer_instance
apply hasLimit_of_iso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_left' :
HasLimit (cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl) ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) :=
show HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map f) ((forget).map g)) from inferInstance
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_right : HasLimit (cospan g f ⋙ forget) := by
have : HasLimit (cospan ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) := by
change HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map g) ((forget).map f))
infer_instance
apply hasLimit_of_iso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_right' :
HasLimit (cospan ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl) ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) :=
show HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map g) ((forget).map f)) from inferInstance
instance forgetCreatesPullbackOfLeft : CreatesLimit (cospan f g) forget :=
createsLimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace Y
(@pullback.snd (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ _ f g _))
(eqToIso (show pullback _ _ = pullback _ _ by congr) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm)
instance forgetCreatesPullbackOfRight : CreatesLimit (cospan g f) forget :=
createsLimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace Y
(@pullback.fst (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ _ g f _))
(eqToIso (show pullback _ _ = pullback _ _ by congr) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm)
instance sheafedSpace_forgetPreserves_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (SheafedSpace.forget C) :=
@Limits.comp_preservesLimit _ _ _ _ _ _ (cospan f g) _ _ forget (PresheafedSpace.forget C)
inferInstance <| by
have : PreservesLimit
(cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) (PresheafedSpace.forget C) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance sheafedSpace_forgetPreserves_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (SheafedSpace.forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance sheafedSpace_hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
hasLimit_of_created (cospan f g) forget
instance sheafedSpace_hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasLimit_of_created (cospan g f) forget
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_snd_of_left :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
have : _ = limit.π (cospan f g) right := preservesLimitIso_hom_π forget (cospan f g) right
rw [← this]
have := HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π (diagramIsoCospan (cospan f g ⋙ forget)) right
erw [Category.comp_id] at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
infer_instance
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_fst_of_right :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
delta pullback.fst
have : _ = limit.π (cospan g f) left := preservesLimitIso_hom_π forget (cospan g f) left
rw [← this]
have := HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π (diagramIsoCospan (cospan g f ⋙ forget)) left
erw [Category.comp_id] at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
infer_instance
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_to_base_isOpenImmersion [SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) one : pullback f g ⟶ Z) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
end Pullback
section OfStalkIso
variable [HasLimits C] [HasColimits C] {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)] [instCC : ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
variable [(CategoryTheory.forget C).ReflectsIsomorphisms]
[PreservesLimits (CategoryTheory.forget C)]
variable [PreservesFilteredColimits (CategoryTheory.forget C)]
include instCC in
/-- Suppose `X Y : SheafedSpace C`, where `C` is a concrete category,
whose forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms, preserves limits and filtered colimits.
Then a morphism `X ⟶ Y` that is a topological open embedding
is an open immersion iff every stalk map is an iso.
-/
theorem of_stalk_iso {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f.base)
[H : ∀ x : X.1, IsIso (f.stalkMap x)] : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
{ base_open := hf
c_iso := fun U => by
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true})
TopCat.Presheaf.app_isIso_of_stalkFunctor_map_iso
(show Y.sheaf ⟶ (TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ f.base).obj X.sheaf from ⟨f.c⟩)
rintro ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩
specialize H y
delta PresheafedSpace.Hom.stalkMap at H
haveI H' := TopCat.Presheaf.stalkPushforward.stalkPushforward_iso_of_isInducing C
hf.toIsInducing X.presheaf y
have := IsIso.comp_isIso' H (@IsIso.inv_isIso _ _ _ _ _ H')
rwa [Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id] at this }
end OfStalkIso
section
variable {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
SheafedSpace.isoMk <| PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict f
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp f U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
H.invApp _ (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality f i
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp _ U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp f U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp _ U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app f U
attribute [elementwise] invApp_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f U
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom <|
le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩).op :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f U
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : SheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict _ hf
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : SheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ h U
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
haveI : IsIso (forgetToPresheafedSpace.map f) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso f
apply isIso_of_reflects_iso _ (SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) :
IsIso (f.stalkMap x) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso f x
end
section Prod
-- Porting note: here `ι` should have same universe level as morphism of `C`, so needs explicit
-- universe level now
variable [HasLimits C] {ι : Type v} (F : Discrete ι ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, v, v} C) [HasColimit F]
(i : Discrete ι)
theorem sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding : IsOpenEmbedding (colimit.ι F i).base := by
rw [← show _ = (colimit.ι F i).base from ι_preservesColimitIso_inv (SheafedSpace.forget C) F i]
have : _ = _ ≫ colimit.ι (Discrete.functor ((F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C).obj ∘ Discrete.mk)) i :=
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom Discrete.natIsoFunctor i
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
rw [this]
have : colimit.ι _ _ ≫ _ = _ :=
TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι.{v, v} ((F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C).obj ∘ Discrete.mk) i.as
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
cases i
rw [this, ← Category.assoc]
-- Porting note: `simp_rw` can't use `TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso` and
-- `TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp`.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso, TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso,
TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso, TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp]
exact .sigmaMk
theorem image_preimage_is_empty (j : Discrete ι) (h : i ≠ j) (U : Opens (F.obj i)) :
(Opens.map (colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) j).base).obj
((Opens.map (preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.base).obj
((sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i).isOpenMap.functor.obj U)) =
⊥ := by
ext x
apply iff_false_intro
rintro ⟨y, hy, eq⟩
replace eq := ConcreteCategory.congr_arg (preservesColimitIso (SheafedSpace.forget C) F ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma.{v, v} _).hom eq
simp_rw [CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_hom, ← TopCat.comp_app, ← PresheafedSpace.comp_base] at eq
rw [ι_preservesColimitIso_inv] at eq
change
((SheafedSpace.forget C).map (colimit.ι F i) ≫ _) y =
((SheafedSpace.forget C).map (colimit.ι F j) ≫ _) x at eq
cases i; cases j
rw [ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc, ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc,
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom_assoc, HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom_assoc,
TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι, TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι] at eq
exact h (congr_arg Discrete.mk (congr_arg Sigma.fst eq))
instance sigma_ι_isOpenImmersion_aux [HasStrictTerminalObjects C] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (colimit.ι F i) where
base_open := sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i
c_iso U := by
have e : colimit.ι F i = _ :=
(ι_preservesColimitIso_inv SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F i).symm
have H :
IsOpenEmbedding
(colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) i ≫
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv).base :=
e ▸ sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i
suffices IsIso <| (colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) i ≫
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv).c.app <|
op (H.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11083): just `convert` is very slow, so helps it a bit
convert this using 2 <;> congr
rw [PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app,
← PresheafedSpace.colimitPresheafObjIsoComponentwiseLimit_hom_π]
-- Porting note: this instance created manually to make the `inferInstance` below work
have inst1 : IsIso (preservesColimitIso forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.c :=
PresheafedSpace.c_isIso_of_iso _
rsuffices : IsIso
(limit.π
(PresheafedSpace.componentwiseDiagram (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
((Opens.map
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.base).obj
(unop <| op <| H.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
(op i))
· infer_instance
apply limit_π_isIso_of_is_strict_terminal
intro j hj
induction j with | op j => ?_
dsimp
convert (F.obj j).sheaf.isTerminalOfEmpty using 3
convert image_preimage_is_empty F i j (fun h => hj (congr_arg op h.symm)) U using 6
exact (congr_arg PresheafedSpace.Hom.base e).symm
instance sigma_ι_isOpenImmersion {ι : Type w} [Small.{v} ι]
(F : Discrete ι ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, v, v} C) [HasColimit F] (i : Discrete ι)
[HasStrictTerminalObjects C] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (colimit.ι F i) := by
obtain ⟨ι', ⟨e⟩⟩ := Small.equiv_small (α := ι)
let f : Discrete ι' ≌ Discrete ι := Discrete.equivalence e.symm
have : colimit.ι F i = (colimit.ι F i ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence f (Iso.refl _)).inv) ≫
(HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence f (Iso.refl _)).hom := by
simp
rw [this, HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π]
infer_instance
end Prod
end SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
instance (X : LocallyRingedSpace) {U : TopCat} (f : U ⟶ X.toTopCat) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (X.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X.toPresheafedSpace hf
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
instance (priority := 100) of_isIso [IsIso g] : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g :=
@PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIsIso _ _ _ _ g.1
⟨⟨(inv g).1, by
erw [← LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom]; rw [IsIso.hom_inv_id]
erw [← LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom]; rw [IsIso.inv_hom_id]; constructor <;> rfl⟩⟩
instance comp (g : Z ⟶ Y) [LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f.1 g.1
instance mono : Mono f :=
LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.mono_of_mono_map (show Mono f.toShHom by infer_instance)
instance : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.map f) :=
H
/-- An explicit pullback cone over `cospan f g` if `f` is an open immersion. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g := by
refine PullbackCone.mk ?_
(Y.ofRestrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left H.base_open g.base)) ?_
· use PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftFst f.1 g.1
intro x
have := PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_cone_of_left_condition f.1 g.1) x
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp] at this
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at this
rw [this]
dsimp
infer_instance
· exact LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_cone_of_left_condition _ _)
instance : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd :=
show PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (Y.toPresheafedSpace.ofRestrict _) by infer_instance
/-- The constructed `pullbackConeOfLeft` is indeed limiting. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun s => by
refine ⟨LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.mk (PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift
f.1 g.1 (PullbackCone.mk _ _ (congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition))) ?_,
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f.1 g.1 _),
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1 _), ?_⟩
· intro x
have :=
PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1
(PullbackCone.mk s.fst.1 s.snd.1
(congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition)))
x
change _ = _ ≫ s.snd.1.stalkMap x at this
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp, ← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at this
rw [this]
infer_instance
· intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans <| LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1 <|
PullbackCone.mk s.fst.1 s.snd.1 <| congr_arg
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullback_snd_of_left :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullback_fst_of_right :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullback_to_base_isOpenImmersion [LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesPullbackOfLeft :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g) <| by
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm.toFun
apply isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f.1 g.1
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_preservesPullback_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g) <| by
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm.toFun
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f.1 g.1
instance forgetToPresheafedSpacePreservesOpenImmersion :
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
((LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map f) :=
H
instance forgetToTop_preservesPullback_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _) := by
change PreservesLimit _ <|
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) ⋙
PresheafedSpace.forget _
-- Porting note: was `apply (config := { instances := False }) ...`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
have : PreservesLimit
(cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map
WalkingCospan.Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map
WalkingCospan.Hom.inr)) (PresheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
have : PreservesLimit (cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
(PresheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat) := by
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
apply Limits.comp_preservesLimit
instance forget_reflectsPullback_of_left :
ReflectsLimit (cospan f g) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forget_preservesPullback_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_preservesPullback_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance forget_reflectsPullback_of_right :
ReflectsLimit (cospan g f) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_reflectsPullback_of_left :
ReflectsLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_reflectsPullback_of_right :
ReflectsLimit (cospan g f)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true}) Functor.ReflectsIsomorphisms.reflects
(F := LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace)
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true}) Functor.ReflectsIsomorphisms.reflects
(F := SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
erw [← PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) f g]
-- Porting note: was `inferInstance`
exact IsIso.comp_isIso' inferInstance <|
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset _ _ H'
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
have := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H'
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H' ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H' := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
theorem lift_range (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
Set.range (lift f g H').base = f.base ⁻¹' Set.range g.base := by
have := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H'
dsimp only [lift]
have : _ = (pullback.fst f g).base :=
PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _) f g
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_base, ← this, ← Category.assoc, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.range_comp,
Set.range_eq_univ.mpr, Set.image_univ]
· rw [TopCat.pullback_fst_range]
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩; exact ⟨y, eq.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩; exact ⟨y, eq.symm⟩
· rw [← TopCat.epi_iff_surjective, show (inv (pullback.snd f g)).base = _ from
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _).map_inv _]
infer_instance
end Pullback
/-- An open immersion is isomorphic to the induced open subscheme on its image. -/
noncomputable def isoRestrict {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] :
X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
LocallyRingedSpace.isoOfSheafedSpaceIso <|
SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.preimageIso <|
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict f.1
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
section OfStalkIso
/-- Suppose `X Y : SheafedSpace C`, where `C` is a concrete category,
whose forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms, preserves limits and filtered colimits.
Then a morphism `X ⟶ Y` that is a topological open embedding
is an open immersion iff every stalk map is an iso.
-/
theorem of_stalk_iso {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f.base)
[stalk_iso : ∀ x : X.1, IsIso (f.stalkMap x)] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso _ hf (H := stalk_iso)
end OfStalkIso
section
variable {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
ext1
dsimp [isoRestrict, isoOfSheafedSpaceIso]
apply SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_injective
rw [Functor.map_comp, SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_preimage]
exact SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f.1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
simp only [← isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp f.1 U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
H.invApp _ (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality f.1 i
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp _ U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp f.1 U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp _ U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app f.1 U
attribute [elementwise nosimp] invApp_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f.1 U
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom <|
le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩).op :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f.1 U
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : LocallyRingedSpace) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict _ hf
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp (X : LocallyRingedSpace) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ h U
instance stalk_iso (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso f.1 x
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
suffices IsIso (LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.map f) from
isIso_of_reflects_iso _ LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace
exact SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso f.1
end
end LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
end AlgebraicGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 1,283 | 1,284 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Nonnegative rationals
This file defines the nonnegative rationals as a subtype of `Rat` and provides its basic algebraic
order structure.
Note that `NNRat` is not declared as a `Semifield` here. See `Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat` for that
instance.
We also define an instance `CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0`. This instance can be used by the `lift` tactic to
replace `x : ℚ` and `hx : 0 ≤ x` in the proof context with `x : ℚ≥0` while replacing all occurrences
of `x` with `↑x`. This tactic also works for a function `f : α → ℚ` with a hypothesis
`hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x`.
## Notation
`ℚ≥0` is notation for `NNRat` in locale `NNRat`.
## Huge warning
Whenever you state a lemma about the coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ`, check that Lean inserts `NNRat.cast`, not
`Subtype.val`. Else your lemma will never apply.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice OrderedCommMonoid
library_note "specialised high priority simp lemma" /--
It sometimes happens that a `@[simp]` lemma declared early in the library can be proved by `simp`
using later, more general simp lemmas. In that case, the following reasons might be arguments for
the early lemma to be tagged `@[simp high]` (rather than `@[simp, nolint simpNF]` or
un``@[simp]``ed):
1. There is a significant portion of the library which needs the early lemma to be available via
`simp` and which doesn't have access to the more general lemmas.
2. The more general lemmas have more complicated typeclass assumptions, causing rewrites with them
to be slower.
-/
open Function
instance Rat.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℚ where
zero_le_one := rfl
instance Rat.instPosMulMono : PosMulMono ℚ where
elim := fun r p q h => by
simp only [mul_comm]
simpa [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using Rat.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 h) r.2
deriving instance CommSemiring for NNRat
deriving instance LinearOrder for NNRat
deriving instance Sub for NNRat
deriving instance Inhabited for NNRat
namespace NNRat
variable {p q : ℚ≥0}
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℚ≥0 where exists_pair_ne := ⟨1, 0, by decide⟩
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot ℚ≥0 where
bot := 0
bot_le q := q.2
@[simp] lemma val_eq_cast (q : ℚ≥0) : q.1 = q := rfl
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℚ≥0 where
cast_injective a b hab := by simpa using congr_arg num hab
instance canLift : CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0 (↑) fun q ↦ 0 ≤ q where
prf q hq := ⟨⟨q, hq⟩, rfl⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext : (p : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) → p = q :=
Subtype.ext
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (p : ℚ) = q ↔ p = q :=
Subtype.coe_inj
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℚ≥0} : (x : ℚ) ≠ (y : ℚ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
NNRat.coe_inj.not
-- TODO: We have to write `NNRat.cast` explicitly, else the statement picks up `Subtype.val` instead
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (q : ℚ) (hq) : NNRat.cast ⟨q, hq⟩ = q := rfl
lemma «forall» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∀ q, p q) ↔ ∀ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.forall
lemma «exists» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∃ q, p q) ↔ ∃ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.exists
/-- Reinterpret a rational number `q` as a non-negative rational number. Returns `0` if `q ≤ 0`. -/
def _root_.Rat.toNNRat (q : ℚ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨max q 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
theorem _root_.Rat.coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) : (q.toNNRat : ℚ) = q :=
max_eq_left hq
theorem _root_.Rat.le_coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) : q ≤ q.toNNRat :=
le_max_left _ _
open Rat (toNNRat)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nonneg (q : ℚ≥0) : (0 : ℚ) ≤ q :=
q.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : num 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_zero : den 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_one : num 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_one : den 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p + q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p * q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p * q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (↑(q ^ n) : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma num_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).num = q.num ^ n := by simp [num, Int.natAbs_pow]
@[simp] lemma den_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).den = q.den ^ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (h : q ≤ p) : ((p - q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p - q :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by rwa [sub_zero]
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem coe_eq_zero : (q : ℚ) = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by norm_cast
theorem coe_ne_zero : (q : ℚ) ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 :=
coe_eq_zero.not
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe : (p : ℚ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe : (p : ℚ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos : (0 : ℚ) < q ↔ 0 < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem coe_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
fun _ _ ↦ coe_le_coe.2
theorem toNNRat_mono : Monotone toNNRat :=
fun _ _ h ↦ max_le_max h le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : toNNRat q = q :=
ext <| max_eq_left q.2
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : toNNRat n = n :=
ext <| by simp only [Nat.cast_nonneg', Rat.coe_toNNRat]; rfl
/-- `toNNRat` and `(↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ` form a Galois insertion. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion toNNRat (↑) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro coe_mono toNNRat_mono Rat.le_coe_toNNRat toNNRat_coe
/-- Coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ` as a `RingHom`. -/
def coeHom : ℚ≥0 →+* ℚ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' := coe_mul
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(↑n : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_natCast (n : ℕ) : @Eq ℚ≥0 (⟨(n : ℚ), Nat.cast_nonneg' n⟩ : ℚ≥0) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : ⇑coeHom = ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem nsmul_coe (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ↑(n • q) = n • (q : ℚ) :=
coeHom.toAddMonoidHom.map_nsmul _ _
theorem bddAbove_coe {s : Set ℚ≥0} : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set ℚ) ↔ BddAbove s :=
⟨fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦
⟨toNNRat b, fun ⟨y, _⟩ hys ↦
show y ≤ max b 0 from (hb <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hys).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, fun _ ⟨_, hx, Eq⟩ ↦ Eq ▸ hb hx⟩⟩
theorem bddBelow_coe (s : Set ℚ≥0) : BddBelow (((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) '' s) :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨q, _, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ q.2⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((max x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = max (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_max
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((min x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = min (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_min
theorem sub_def (p q : ℚ≥0) : p - q = toNNRat (p - q) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem abs_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : |(q : ℚ)| = q :=
abs_of_nonneg q.2
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero (q : ℚ≥0) : q ≤ 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
⟨fun h => le_antisymm h q.2, fun h => h.symm ▸ q.2⟩
end NNRat
open NNRat
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_zero : toNNRat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_one : toNNRat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_pos : 0 < toNNRat q ↔ 0 < q := by simp [toNNRat, ← coe_lt_coe]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_eq_zero : toNNRat q = 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by
simpa [-toNNRat_pos] using (@toNNRat_pos q).not
alias ⟨_, toNNRat_of_nonpos⟩ := toNNRat_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_le_toNNRat_iff (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ q ≤ p := by
simp [← coe_le_coe, toNNRat, hp]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff' : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p ∧ 0 < p := by
simp [← coe_lt_coe, toNNRat, lt_irrefl]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff (h : 0 < p) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans (and_iff_left h)
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff_of_nonneg (hq : 0 ≤ q) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans ⟨And.left, fun h ↦ ⟨h, hq.trans_lt h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_add (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat (q + p) = toNNRat q + toNNRat p :=
NNRat.ext <| by simp [toNNRat, hq, hp, add_nonneg]
theorem toNNRat_add_le : toNNRat (q + p) ≤ toNNRat q + toNNRat p :=
coe_le_coe.1 <| max_le (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)) <| coe_nonneg _
theorem toNNRat_le_iff_le_coe {p : ℚ≥0} : toNNRat q ≤ p ↔ q ≤ ↑p :=
NNRat.gi.gc q p
|
theorem le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le {q : ℚ≥0} (hp : 0 ≤ p) : q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ ↑q ≤ p := by
| Mathlib/Data/NNRat/Defs.lean | 280 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
/-!
# N-ary images of sets
This file defines `Set.image2`, the binary image of sets.
This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations and `Set.seq`.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Finset.NAry`, to `Order.Filter.NAry`, and to
`Data.Option.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*} {f f' : α → β → γ}
variable {s s' : Set α} {t t' : Set β} {u : Set γ} {v : Set δ} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem mem_image2_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a', ha', b', hb', h⟩
rcases hf h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha', hb'⟩, fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
/-- image2 is monotone with respect to `⊆`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t' := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hs ha) (ht hb)
|
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s t' :=
| Mathlib/Data/Set/NAry.lean | 37 | 39 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
/-!
# More basic logic properties
A few more logic lemmas. These are in their own file, rather than `Logic.Basic`, because it is
convenient to be able to use the `tauto` or `split_ifs` tactics.
## Implementation notes
We spell those lemmas out with `dite` and `ite` rather than the `if then else` notation because this
would result in less delta-reduced statements.
-/
theorem iff_assoc {a b c : Prop} : ((a ↔ b) ↔ c) ↔ (a ↔ (b ↔ c)) := by tauto
theorem iff_left_comm {a b c : Prop} : (a ↔ (b ↔ c)) ↔ (b ↔ (a ↔ c)) := by tauto
theorem iff_right_comm {a b c : Prop} : ((a ↔ b) ↔ c) ↔ ((a ↔ c) ↔ b) := by tauto
protected alias ⟨HEq.eq, Eq.heq⟩ := heq_iff_eq
variable {α : Sort*} {p q : Prop} [Decidable p] [Decidable q] {a b c : α}
theorem dite_dite_distrib_left {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → q → α} {c : ¬p → ¬q → α} :
(dite p a fun hp ↦ dite q (b hp) (c hp)) =
dite q (fun hq ↦ (dite p a) fun hp ↦ b hp hq) fun hq ↦ (dite p a) fun hp ↦ c hp hq := by
| split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_dite_distrib_right {a : p → q → α} {b : p → ¬q → α} {c : ¬p → α} :
dite p (fun hp ↦ dite q (a hp) (b hp)) c =
| Mathlib/Logic/Lemmas.lean | 32 | 35 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
/-!
# Results about division in extended non-negative reals
This file establishes basic properties related to the inversion and division operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
For instance, as a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation
with integer exponent.
## Main results
A few order isomorphisms are worthy of mention:
- `OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ`: The map `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an order isomorphism to the dual.
- `orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`: The birational order isomorphism between
`ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` given by `x ↦ (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹` with inverse
`x ↦ (x⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹`
- `orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a`: Order isomorphism between an initial
interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0` given by the identity map.
- `orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`: An order isomorphism between
the extended nonnegative real numbers and the unit interval. This is `orderIsoIicOneBirational`
composed with the identity order isomorphism between `Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` and `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by
simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hr, coe_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ h0
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b * b⁻¹ = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b⁻¹ * b = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b / b = a := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' hb₀ hb
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b / b = a :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' ha₀ ha
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' ha₀ ha]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
protected alias ⟨_, Finiteness.inv_ne_top⟩ := ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1.lt_top (inv_ne_top.mpr h2).lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
protected theorem inv_mul_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ 0) (h2 : x ≠ ∞) :
x⁻¹ * y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ x * z := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_left h1 h2, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h1 h2, one_mul]
protected theorem mul_inv_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x * y⁻¹ ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.inv_mul_le_iff h1 h2, mul_comm]
protected theorem div_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem div_le_iff' {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ y * z := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
protected theorem inv_div {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (htop : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) (hzero : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ 0) :
(a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_zero] at htop
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_top] at hzero
rw [ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.mul_inv htop hzero, mul_comm, inv_inv]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
/-- The inverse map `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is an order isomorphism between `ℝ≥0∞` and its `OrderDual` -/
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
@[simp] protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
@[simp] protected lemma mul_inv_le_one (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a * a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := ENNReal.div_self_le_one
@[simp] protected lemma inv_mul_le_one (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a⁻¹ * a ≤ 1 := by simp [mul_comm]
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_ne_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a * a⁻¹ ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top one_ne_top a.mul_inv_le_one
@[simp] lemma inv_mul_ne_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a⁻¹ * a ≠ ⊤ := by simp [mul_comm]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
@[simp 900]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] <;>
· right
simp
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div (hab : a ≤ b) (hdc : d ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / d :=
div_eq_mul_inv b d ▸ div_eq_mul_inv a c ▸ mul_le_mul' hab (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mpr hdc)
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
ENNReal.div_le_div le_rfl h
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
ENNReal.div_le_div h le_rfl
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h), ← mul_assoc, h,
one_mul]
rintro rfl
simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h] at h
theorem mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b := by
rw [← @ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁,
one_mul]
theorem le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr
exact h r hr
lemma eq_of_forall_nnreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x ↔ ↑r ≤ y) : x = y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun _r hr ↦ (h _).1 hr.le)
(le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun _r hr ↦ (h _).2 hr.le)
theorem le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r → ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr =>
(zero_le r).eq_or_lt.elim (fun h => h ▸ zero_le _) fun h0 => h r h0 hr
theorem eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique <| le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r _ => h r
protected theorem add_div : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
right_distrib a b c⁻¹
protected theorem div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
ENNReal.add_div.symm
protected theorem div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
theorem mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
mul_le_of_le_div' le_rfl
theorem eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) : b = c / a ↔ a * b = c :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel ha ha'], fun h => by
rw [← h, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel ha ha']⟩
protected theorem div_eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b ≠ ∞) :
c / b = d / a ↔ a * c = b * d := by
rw [eq_div_iff ha ha']
conv_rhs => rw [eq_comm]
rw [← eq_div_iff hb hb', mul_div_assoc, eq_comm]
theorem div_eq_one_iff {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb₁ : b ≠ ∞) : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← (eq_div_iff hb₀ hb₁).mp h.symm, mul_one], fun h =>
h.symm ▸ ENNReal.div_self hb₀ hb₁⟩
theorem inv_two_add_inv_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.div_self two_ne_zero ofNat_ne_top]
theorem inv_three_add_inv_three : (3 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel three_ne_zero ofNat_ne_top]
ring
@[simp]
protected theorem add_halves (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem add_thirds (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, inv_three_add_inv_three, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem div_eq_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or]
protected lemma div_ne_zero : a / b ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero, div_pos_iff]
protected lemma div_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (htop : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv, inv_inv]
· ring
· simpa
· simpa
protected lemma mul_div_mul_comm (hc : c ≠ 0 ∨ d ≠ ∞) (hd : c ≠ ∞ ∨ d ≠ 0) :
a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv hc hd]
ring
protected theorem half_pos (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a / 2 :=
ENNReal.div_pos h ofNat_ne_top
protected theorem one_half_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) < 1 :=
ENNReal.inv_lt_one.2 <| one_lt_two
protected theorem half_lt_self (hz : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a / 2 < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
rw [coe_ne_zero] at hz
rw [← coe_two, ← coe_div, coe_lt_coe]
exacts [NNReal.half_lt_self hz, two_ne_zero' _]
protected theorem half_le_self : a / 2 ≤ a :=
le_add_self.trans_eq <| ENNReal.add_halves _
theorem sub_half (h : a ≠ ∞) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 := ENNReal.sub_eq_of_eq_add' h a.add_halves.symm
@[simp]
theorem one_sub_inv_two : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) - 2⁻¹ = 2⁻¹ := by
rw [← one_div, sub_half one_ne_top]
private lemma exists_lt_mul_left {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c < a * b) : ∃ a' < a, c < a' * b := by
obtain ⟨a', hc, ha'⟩ := exists_between (ENNReal.div_lt_of_lt_mul hc)
exact ⟨_, ha', (ENNReal.div_lt_iff (.inl <| by rintro rfl; simp at *)
(.inr <| by rintro rfl; simp at *)).1 hc⟩
private lemma exists_lt_mul_right {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c < a * b) : ∃ b' < b, c < a * b' := by
simp_rw [mul_comm a] at hc ⊢; exact exists_lt_mul_left hc
lemma mul_le_of_forall_lt {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' * b' ≤ c) : a * b ≤ c := by
refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun d hd ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a', ha', hd⟩ := exists_lt_mul_left hd
obtain ⟨b', hb', hd⟩ := exists_lt_mul_right hd
exact le_trans hd.le <| h _ ha' _ hb'
lemma le_mul_of_forall_lt {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (h₂ : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ a' > a, ∀ b' > b, c ≤ a' * b') : c ≤ a * b := by
rw [← ENNReal.inv_le_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv h₁ h₂]
exact mul_le_of_forall_lt fun a' ha' b' hb' ↦ ENNReal.le_inv_iff_le_inv.1 <|
(h _ (ENNReal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv.1 ha') _ (ENNReal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv.1 hb')).trans_eq
(ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hb'.ne_top) (Or.inl ha'.ne_top)).symm
/-- The birational order isomorphism between `ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`. -/
@[simps! apply_coe]
def orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
refine StrictMono.orderIsoOfRightInverse
(fun x => ⟨(x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹, ENNReal.inv_le_one.2 <| le_add_self⟩)
(fun x y hxy => ?_) (fun x => (x.1⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹) fun x => Subtype.ext ?_
· simpa only [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, ENNReal.inv_lt_inv, ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_right one_ne_top]
· have : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ x.1⁻¹ := ENNReal.one_le_inv.2 x.2
simp only [inv_inv, Subtype.coe_mk, tsub_add_cancel_of_le this]
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIicOneBirational_symm_apply (x : Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) :
orderIsoIicOneBirational.symm x = (x.1⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹ :=
rfl
/-- Order isomorphism between an initial interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0`. -/
@[simps! apply_coe]
def orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a :=
| OrderIso.symm
{ toFun := fun x => ⟨x, coe_le_coe.2 x.2⟩
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 567 | 568 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
/-!
# Homological complexes.
A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
We provide `ChainComplex V α` for
`α`-indexed chain complexes in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`,
and similarly `CochainComplex V α`, with `i = j + 1`.
There is a category structure, where morphisms are chain maps.
For `C : HomologicalComplex V c`, we define `C.xNext i`, which is either `C.X j` for some
arbitrarily chosen `j` such that `c.r i j`, or `C.X i` if there is no such `j`.
Similarly we have `C.xPrev j`.
Defined in terms of these we have `C.dFrom i : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i` and
`C.dTo j : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j`, which are either defined as `C.d i j`, or zero, as needed.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
-/
structure HomologicalComplex (c : ComplexShape ι) where
X : ι → V
d : ∀ i j, X i ⟶ X j
shape : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel i j → d i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
d_comp_d' : ∀ i j k, c.Rel i j → c.Rel j k → d i j ≫ d j k = 0 := by aesop_cat
namespace HomologicalComplex
attribute [simp] shape
variable {V} {c : ComplexShape ι}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_comp_d (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i j k : ι) : C.d i j ≫ C.d j k = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hjk : c.Rel j k
· exact C.d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk
· rw [C.shape j k hjk, comp_zero]
· rw [C.shape i j hij, zero_comp]
theorem ext {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h_X : C₁.X = C₂.X)
(h_d :
∀ i j : ι,
c.Rel i j → C₁.d i j ≫ eqToHom (congr_fun h_X j) = eqToHom (congr_fun h_X i) ≫ C₂.d i j) :
C₁ = C₂ := by
obtain ⟨X₁, d₁, s₁, h₁⟩ := C₁
obtain ⟨X₂, d₂, s₂, h₂⟩ := C₂
dsimp at h_X
subst h_X
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· simpa only [comp_id, id_comp, eqToHom_refl] using h_d i j hij
· rw [s₁ i j hij, s₂ i j hij]
/-- The obvious isomorphism `K.X p ≅ K.X q` when `p = q`. -/
def XIsoOfEq (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p q : ι} (h : p = q) : K.X p ≅ K.X q :=
eqToIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
lemma XIsoOfEq_rfl (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (p : ι) :
K.XIsoOfEq (rfl : p = p) = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₃₂.symm)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₂₁.symm.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₃₂.trans h₂₁).symm).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ : ι} (h : p₁ = p₂) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₁ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₁) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₃) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₃ = p₂) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
end HomologicalComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed chain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`.
-/
abbrev ChainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.down α)
/-- An `α`-indexed cochain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `i + 1 = j`.
-/
abbrev CochainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.up α)
namespace ChainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.down α).prev i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).prev_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.down α).next i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).next_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.down ℕ).next_eq' rfl
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.up α).prev i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).prev_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.up α).next i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).next_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev_eq' rfl
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {V}
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes consists of maps between the chain groups,
commuting with the differentials.
-/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) where
f : ∀ i, A.X i ⟶ B.X i
comm' : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f j := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Hom.comm {A B : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : A.Hom B) (i j : ι) :
f.f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f.f j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· exact f.comm' i j hij
· rw [A.shape i j hij, B.shape i j hij, comp_zero, zero_comp]
instance (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) : Inhabited (Hom A B) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0 }⟩
/-- Identity chain map. -/
def id (A : HomologicalComplex V c) : Hom A A where f _ := 𝟙 _
/-- Composition of chain maps. -/
def comp (A B C : HomologicalComplex V c) (φ : Hom A B) (ψ : Hom B C) : Hom A C where
f i := φ.f i ≫ ψ.f i
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
instance : Category (HomologicalComplex V c) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp _ _ _
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} (f g : C ⟶ D)
(h : ∀ i, f.f i = g.f i) : f = g := by
apply Hom.ext
funext
apply h
@[simp]
theorem id_f (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : Hom.f (𝟙 C) i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_f {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
(f ≫ g).f i = f.f i ≫ g.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h : C₁ = C₂) (n : ι) :
HomologicalComplex.Hom.f (eqToHom h) n =
eqToHom (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.X h) n) := by
subst h
rfl
-- We'll use this later to show that `HomologicalComplex V c` is preadditive when `V` is.
theorem hom_f_injective {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} :
Function.Injective fun f : Hom C₁ C₂ => f.f := by aesop_cat
instance (X Y : HomologicalComplex V c) : Zero (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0}⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_f (C D : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (HomologicalComplex V c) where
open ZeroObject
/-- The zero complex -/
noncomputable def zero [HasZeroObject V] : HomologicalComplex V c where
X _ := 0
d _ _ := 0
theorem isZero_zero [HasZeroObject V] : IsZero (zero : HomologicalComplex V c) := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
all_goals
ext
| dsimp only [zero]
subsingleton
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplex.lean | 294 | 295 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 3,127 | 3,129 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
end EMetric
open EMetric
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
alias ⟨_root_.Inseparable.edist_eq_zero, _⟩ := EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
section Compact
-- TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
end SecondCountable
end EMetric
variable {γ : Type w} [EMetricSpace γ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- An emetric space is separated -/
instance (priority := 100) EMetricSpace.instT0Space : T0Space γ where
t0 _ _ h := eq_of_edist_eq_zero <| inseparable_iff.1 h
/-- A map between emetric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem EMetric.isUniformEmbedding_iff' [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : γ → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing, isUniformInducing_iff, uniformContinuous_iff]
/-- If a `PseudoEMetricSpace` is a T₀ space, then it is an `EMetricSpace`. -/
-- TODO: make it an instance?
abbrev EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [T0Space α] :
EMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoEMetricSpace α› with
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := fun h => (EMetric.inseparable_iff.2 h).eq }
/-- The product of two emetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
metric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.emetricSpaceMax [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (γ × β) :=
.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace _
namespace EMetric
/-- A compact set in an emetric space is separable, i.e., it is the closure of a countable set. -/
theorem countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set γ} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s = closure t := by
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_compact hs with ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub.antisymm (closure_minimal hts hs.isClosed)⟩
end EMetric
/-!
### Separation quotient
-/
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EDist (SeparationQuotient X) where
edist := SeparationQuotient.lift₂ edist fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
edist_congr (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hx) (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hy)
@[simp] theorem SeparationQuotient.edist_mk [PseudoEMetricSpace X] (x y : X) :
edist (mk x) (mk y) = edist x y :=
rfl
open SeparationQuotient in
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X) :=
@EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X)
{ edist_self := surjective_mk.forall.2 edist_self,
edist_comm := surjective_mk.forall₂.2 edist_comm,
edist_triangle := surjective_mk.forall₃.2 edist_triangle,
toUniformSpace := inferInstance,
uniformity_edist := comap_injective (surjective_mk.prodMap surjective_mk) <| by
simp [comap_mk_uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist] } _
namespace TopologicalSpace
section Compact
open Topology
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
end Compact
end TopologicalSpace
section LebesgueNumberLemma
variable {s : Set α}
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric {ι : Sort*} {c : ι → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_sUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, IsOpen t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₂; simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric hs (by simpa) hc₂
end LebesgueNumberLemma
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 375 | 380 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Tactic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Additively-graded multiplicative structures
This module provides a set of heterogeneous typeclasses for defining a multiplicative structure
over the sigma type `GradedMonoid A` such that `(*) : A i → A j → A (i + j)`; that is to say, `A`
forms an additively-graded monoid. The typeclasses are:
* `GradedMonoid.GOne A`
* `GradedMonoid.GMul A`
* `GradedMonoid.GMonoid A`
* `GradedMonoid.GCommMonoid A`
These respectively imbue:
* `One (GradedMonoid A)`
* `Mul (GradedMonoid A)`
* `Monoid (GradedMonoid A)`
* `CommMonoid (GradedMonoid A)`
the base type `A 0` with:
* `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.One`
* `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.Mul`
* `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.Monoid`
* `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.CommMonoid`
and the `i`th grade `A i` with `A 0`-actions (`•`) defined as left-multiplication:
* (nothing)
* `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.SMul (A 0)`
* `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.MulAction (A 0)`
* (nothing)
For now, these typeclasses are primarily used in the construction of `DirectSum.Ring` and the rest
of that file.
## Dependent graded products
This also introduces `List.dProd`, which takes the (possibly non-commutative) product of a list
of graded elements of type `A i`. This definition primarily exist to allow `GradedMonoid.mk`
and `DirectSum.of` to be pulled outside a product, such as in `GradedMonoid.mk_list_dProd` and
`DirectSum.of_list_dProd`.
## Internally graded monoids
In addition to the above typeclasses, in the most frequent case when `A` is an indexed collection of
`SetLike` subobjects (such as `AddSubmonoid`s, `AddSubgroup`s, or `Submodule`s), this file
provides the `Prop` typeclasses:
* `SetLike.GradedOne A` (which provides the obvious `GradedMonoid.GOne A` instance)
* `SetLike.GradedMul A` (which provides the obvious `GradedMonoid.GMul A` instance)
* `SetLike.GradedMonoid A` (which provides the obvious `GradedMonoid.GMonoid A` and
`GradedMonoid.GCommMonoid A` instances)
which respectively provide the API lemmas
* `SetLike.one_mem_graded`
* `SetLike.mul_mem_graded`
* `SetLike.pow_mem_graded`, `SetLike.list_prod_map_mem_graded`
Strictly this last class is unnecessary as it has no fields not present in its parents, but it is
included for convenience. Note that there is no need for `SetLike.GradedRing` or similar, as all
the information it would contain is already supplied by `GradedMonoid` when `A` is a collection
of objects satisfying `AddSubmonoidClass` such as `Submodule`s. These constructions are explored
in `Algebra.DirectSum.Internal`.
This file also defines:
* `SetLike.IsHomogeneousElem A` (which says that `a` is homogeneous iff `a ∈ A i` for some `i : ι`)
* `SetLike.homogeneousSubmonoid A`, which is, as the name suggests, the submonoid consisting of
all the homogeneous elements.
## Tags
graded monoid
-/
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A type alias of sigma types for graded monoids. -/
def GradedMonoid (A : ι → Type*) :=
Sigma A
namespace GradedMonoid
instance {A : ι → Type*} [Inhabited ι] [Inhabited (A default)] : Inhabited (GradedMonoid A) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Inhabited (Sigma _)
/-- Construct an element of a graded monoid. -/
def mk {A : ι → Type*} : ∀ i, A i → GradedMonoid A :=
Sigma.mk
/-! ### Actions -/
section actions
variable {α β} {A : ι → Type*}
/-- If `R` acts on each `A i`, then it acts on `GradedMonoid A` via the `.2` projection. -/
instance [∀ i, SMul α (A i)] : SMul α (GradedMonoid A) where
smul r g := GradedMonoid.mk g.1 (r • g.2)
@[simp] theorem fst_smul [∀ i, SMul α (A i)] (a : α) (x : GradedMonoid A) :
(a • x).fst = x.fst := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_smul [∀ i, SMul α (A i)] (a : α) (x : GradedMonoid A) :
(a • x).snd = a • x.snd := rfl
theorem smul_mk [∀ i, SMul α (A i)] {i} (c : α) (a : A i) :
c • mk i a = mk i (c • a) :=
rfl
instance [∀ i, SMul α (A i)] [∀ i, SMul β (A i)]
[∀ i, SMulCommClass α β (A i)] :
SMulCommClass α β (GradedMonoid A) where
smul_comm a b g := Sigma.ext rfl <| heq_of_eq <| smul_comm a b g.2
instance [SMul α β] [∀ i, SMul α (A i)] [∀ i, SMul β (A i)]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower α β (A i)] :
IsScalarTower α β (GradedMonoid A) where
smul_assoc a b g := Sigma.ext rfl <| heq_of_eq <| smul_assoc a b g.2
instance [Monoid α] [∀ i, MulAction α (A i)] :
MulAction α (GradedMonoid A) where
one_smul g := Sigma.ext rfl <| heq_of_eq <| one_smul _ g.2
mul_smul r₁ r₂ g := Sigma.ext rfl <| heq_of_eq <| mul_smul r₁ r₂ g.2
end actions
/-! ### Typeclasses -/
section Defs
variable (A : ι → Type*)
/-- A graded version of `One`, which must be of grade 0. -/
class GOne [Zero ι] where
/-- The term `one` of grade 0 -/
one : A 0
/-- `GOne` implies `One (GradedMonoid A)` -/
instance GOne.toOne [Zero ι] [GOne A] : One (GradedMonoid A) :=
⟨⟨_, GOne.one⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem fst_one [Zero ι] [GOne A] : (1 : GradedMonoid A).fst = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_one [Zero ι] [GOne A] : (1 : GradedMonoid A).snd = GOne.one := rfl
/-- A graded version of `Mul`. Multiplication combines grades additively, like
`AddMonoidAlgebra`. -/
class GMul [Add ι] where
/-- The homogeneous multiplication map `mul` -/
mul {i j} : A i → A j → A (i + j)
/-- `GMul` implies `Mul (GradedMonoid A)`. -/
instance GMul.toMul [Add ι] [GMul A] : Mul (GradedMonoid A) :=
⟨fun x y : GradedMonoid A => ⟨_, GMul.mul x.snd y.snd⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem fst_mul [Add ι] [GMul A] (x y : GradedMonoid A) :
(x * y).fst = x.fst + y.fst := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_mul [Add ι] [GMul A] (x y : GradedMonoid A) :
(x * y).snd = GMul.mul x.snd y.snd := rfl
theorem mk_mul_mk [Add ι] [GMul A] {i j} (a : A i) (b : A j) :
mk i a * mk j b = mk (i + j) (GMul.mul a b) :=
rfl
namespace GMonoid
variable {A}
variable [AddMonoid ι] [GMul A] [GOne A]
/-- A default implementation of power on a graded monoid, like `npowRec`.
`GMonoid.gnpow` should be used instead. -/
def gnpowRec : ∀ (n : ℕ) {i}, A i → A (n • i)
| 0, i, _ => cast (congr_arg A (zero_nsmul i).symm) GOne.one
| n + 1, i, a => cast (congr_arg A (succ_nsmul i n).symm) (GMul.mul (gnpowRec _ a) a)
@[simp]
theorem gnpowRec_zero (a : GradedMonoid A) : GradedMonoid.mk _ (gnpowRec 0 a.snd) = 1 :=
Sigma.ext (zero_nsmul _) (heq_of_cast_eq _ rfl).symm
@[simp]
theorem gnpowRec_succ (n : ℕ) (a : GradedMonoid A) :
(GradedMonoid.mk _ <| gnpowRec n.succ a.snd) = ⟨_, gnpowRec n a.snd⟩ * a :=
Sigma.ext (succ_nsmul _ _) (heq_of_cast_eq _ rfl).symm
end GMonoid
/-- A tactic to for use as an optional value for `GMonoid.gnpow_zero'`. -/
macro "apply_gmonoid_gnpowRec_zero_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| apply GMonoid.gnpowRec_zero)
/-- A tactic to for use as an optional value for `GMonoid.gnpow_succ'`. -/
macro "apply_gmonoid_gnpowRec_succ_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| apply GMonoid.gnpowRec_succ)
/-- A graded version of `Monoid`
Like `Monoid.npow`, this has an optional `GMonoid.gnpow` field to allow definitional control of
natural powers of a graded monoid. -/
class GMonoid [AddMonoid ι] extends GMul A, GOne A where
/-- Multiplication by `one` on the left is the identity -/
one_mul (a : GradedMonoid A) : 1 * a = a
/-- Multiplication by `one` on the right is the identity -/
mul_one (a : GradedMonoid A) : a * 1 = a
/-- Multiplication is associative -/
mul_assoc (a b c : GradedMonoid A) : a * b * c = a * (b * c)
/-- Optional field to allow definitional control of natural powers -/
gnpow : ∀ (n : ℕ) {i}, A i → A (n • i) := GMonoid.gnpowRec
/-- The zeroth power will yield 1 -/
gnpow_zero' : ∀ a : GradedMonoid A, GradedMonoid.mk _ (gnpow 0 a.snd) = 1 := by
apply_gmonoid_gnpowRec_zero_tac
/-- Successor powers behave as expected -/
gnpow_succ' :
∀ (n : ℕ) (a : GradedMonoid A),
(GradedMonoid.mk _ <| gnpow n.succ a.snd) = ⟨_, gnpow n a.snd⟩ * a := by
apply_gmonoid_gnpowRec_succ_tac
/-- `GMonoid` implies a `Monoid (GradedMonoid A)`. -/
instance GMonoid.toMonoid [AddMonoid ι] [GMonoid A] : Monoid (GradedMonoid A) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
npow n a := GradedMonoid.mk _ (GMonoid.gnpow n a.snd)
npow_zero a := GMonoid.gnpow_zero' a
npow_succ n a := GMonoid.gnpow_succ' n a
one_mul := GMonoid.one_mul
mul_one := GMonoid.mul_one
mul_assoc := GMonoid.mul_assoc
@[simp] theorem fst_pow [AddMonoid ι] [GMonoid A] (x : GradedMonoid A) (n : ℕ) :
(x ^ n).fst = n • x.fst := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_pow [AddMonoid ι] [GMonoid A] (x : GradedMonoid A) (n : ℕ) :
(x ^ n).snd = GMonoid.gnpow n x.snd := rfl
theorem mk_pow [AddMonoid ι] [GMonoid A] {i} (a : A i) (n : ℕ) :
mk i a ^ n = mk (n • i) (GMonoid.gnpow _ a) := rfl
/-- A graded version of `CommMonoid`. -/
class GCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid ι] extends GMonoid A where
/-- Multiplication is commutative -/
mul_comm (a : GradedMonoid A) (b : GradedMonoid A) : a * b = b * a
/-- `GCommMonoid` implies a `CommMonoid (GradedMonoid A)`, although this is only used as an
instance locally to define notation in `gmonoid` and similar typeclasses. -/
instance GCommMonoid.toCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid ι] [GCommMonoid A] : CommMonoid (GradedMonoid A) :=
{ GMonoid.toMonoid A with mul_comm := GCommMonoid.mul_comm }
end Defs
/-! ### Instances for `A 0`
The various `g*` instances are enough to promote the `AddCommMonoid (A 0)` structure to various
types of multiplicative structure.
-/
section GradeZero
variable (A : ι → Type*)
section One
variable [Zero ι] [GOne A]
/-- `1 : A 0` is the value provided in `GOne.one`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
instance GradeZero.one : One (A 0) :=
⟨GOne.one⟩
end One
section Mul
variable [AddZeroClass ι] [GMul A]
/-- `(•) : A 0 → A i → A i` is the value provided in `GradedMonoid.GMul.mul`, composed with
an `Eq.rec` to turn `A (0 + i)` into `A i`.
-/
instance GradeZero.smul (i : ι) : SMul (A 0) (A i) where
smul x y := @Eq.rec ι (0+i) (fun a _ => A a) (GMul.mul x y) i (zero_add i)
/-- `(*) : A 0 → A 0 → A 0` is the value provided in `GradedMonoid.GMul.mul`, composed with
an `Eq.rec` to turn `A (0 + 0)` into `A 0`.
-/
instance GradeZero.mul : Mul (A 0) where mul := (· • ·)
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero_smul {i} (a : A 0) (b : A i) : mk _ (a • b) = mk _ a * mk _ b :=
Sigma.ext (zero_add _).symm <| eqRec_heq _ _
@[scoped simp]
theorem GradeZero.smul_eq_mul (a b : A 0) : a • b = a * b :=
rfl
end Mul
section Monoid
variable [AddMonoid ι] [GMonoid A]
instance : NatPow (A 0) where
pow x n := @Eq.rec ι (n • (0 : ι)) (fun a _ => A a) (GMonoid.gnpow n x) 0 (nsmul_zero n)
variable {A} in
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero_pow (a : A 0) (n : ℕ) : mk _ (a ^ n) = mk _ a ^ n :=
Sigma.ext (nsmul_zero n).symm <| eqRec_heq _ _
/-- The `Monoid` structure derived from `GMonoid A`. -/
instance GradeZero.monoid : Monoid (A 0) :=
Function.Injective.monoid (mk 0) sigma_mk_injective rfl mk_zero_smul mk_zero_pow
end Monoid
section Monoid
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [GCommMonoid A]
/-- The `CommMonoid` structure derived from `GCommMonoid A`. -/
instance GradeZero.commMonoid : CommMonoid (A 0) :=
Function.Injective.commMonoid (mk 0) sigma_mk_injective rfl mk_zero_smul mk_zero_pow
end Monoid
section MulAction
variable [AddMonoid ι] [GMonoid A]
/-- `GradedMonoid.mk 0` is a `MonoidHom`, using the `GradedMonoid.GradeZero.monoid` structure.
-/
def mkZeroMonoidHom : A 0 →* GradedMonoid A where
toFun := mk 0
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := mk_zero_smul
/-- Each grade `A i` derives an `A 0`-action structure from `GMonoid A`. -/
instance GradeZero.mulAction {i} : MulAction (A 0) (A i) :=
letI := MulAction.compHom (GradedMonoid A) (mkZeroMonoidHom A)
Function.Injective.mulAction (mk i) sigma_mk_injective mk_zero_smul
end MulAction
end GradeZero
end GradedMonoid
/-! ### Dependent products of graded elements -/
section DProd
variable {α : Type*} {A : ι → Type*} [AddMonoid ι] [GradedMonoid.GMonoid A]
/-- The index used by `List.dProd`. Propositionally this is equal to `(l.map fι).Sum`, but
definitionally it needs to have a different form to avoid introducing `Eq.rec`s in `List.dProd`. -/
def List.dProdIndex (l : List α) (fι : α → ι) : ι :=
l.foldr (fun i b => fι i + b) 0
@[simp]
theorem List.dProdIndex_nil (fι : α → ι) : ([] : List α).dProdIndex fι = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem List.dProdIndex_cons (a : α) (l : List α) (fι : α → ι) :
(a :: l).dProdIndex fι = fι a + l.dProdIndex fι :=
rfl
theorem List.dProdIndex_eq_map_sum (l : List α) (fι : α → ι) :
l.dProdIndex fι = (l.map fι).sum := by
match l with
| [] => simp
| head::tail => simp [List.dProdIndex_eq_map_sum tail fι]
/-- A dependent product for graded monoids represented by the indexed family of types `A i`.
This is a dependent version of `(l.map fA).prod`.
For a list `l : List α`, this computes the product of `fA a` over `a`, where each `fA` is of type
`A (fι a)`. -/
def List.dProd (l : List α) (fι : α → ι) (fA : ∀ a, A (fι a)) : A (l.dProdIndex fι) :=
l.foldrRecOn _ GradedMonoid.GOne.one fun _ x a _ => GradedMonoid.GMul.mul (fA a) x
@[simp]
theorem List.dProd_nil (fι : α → ι) (fA : ∀ a, A (fι a)) :
(List.nil : List α).dProd fι fA = GradedMonoid.GOne.one :=
rfl
-- the `( :)` in this lemma statement results in the type on the RHS not being unfolded, which
-- is nicer in the goal view.
@[simp]
theorem List.dProd_cons (fι : α → ι) (fA : ∀ a, A (fι a)) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).dProd fι fA = (GradedMonoid.GMul.mul (fA a) (l.dProd fι fA) :) :=
rfl
theorem GradedMonoid.mk_list_dProd (l : List α) (fι : α → ι) (fA : ∀ a, A (fι a)) :
GradedMonoid.mk _ (l.dProd fι fA) = (l.map fun a => GradedMonoid.mk (fι a) (fA a)).prod := by
match l with
| [] => simp only [List.dProdIndex_nil, List.dProd_nil, List.map_nil, List.prod_nil]; rfl
| head::tail =>
simp [← GradedMonoid.mk_list_dProd tail _ _, GradedMonoid.mk_mul_mk, List.prod_cons]
/-- A variant of `GradedMonoid.mk_list_dProd` for rewriting in the other direction. -/
theorem GradedMonoid.list_prod_map_eq_dProd (l : List α) (f : α → GradedMonoid A) :
(l.map f).prod = GradedMonoid.mk _ (l.dProd (fun i => (f i).1) fun i => (f i).2) := by
rw [GradedMonoid.mk_list_dProd, GradedMonoid.mk]
simp_rw [Sigma.eta]
theorem GradedMonoid.list_prod_ofFn_eq_dProd {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → GradedMonoid A) :
(List.ofFn f).prod =
GradedMonoid.mk _ ((List.finRange n).dProd (fun i => (f i).1) fun i => (f i).2) := by
rw [List.ofFn_eq_map, GradedMonoid.list_prod_map_eq_dProd]
end DProd
/-! ### Concrete instances -/
section
variable (ι) {R : Type*}
@[simps one]
instance One.gOne [Zero ι] [One R] : GradedMonoid.GOne fun _ : ι => R where one := 1
@[simps mul]
instance Mul.gMul [Add ι] [Mul R] : GradedMonoid.GMul fun _ : ι => R where mul x y := x * y
/-- If all grades are the same type and themselves form a monoid, then there is a trivial grading
structure. -/
@[simps gnpow]
instance Monoid.gMonoid [AddMonoid ι] [Monoid R] : GradedMonoid.GMonoid fun _ : ι => R :=
-- { Mul.gMul ι, One.gOne ι with
{ One.gOne ι with
mul := fun x y => x * y
one_mul := fun _ => Sigma.ext (zero_add _) (heq_of_eq (one_mul _))
mul_one := fun _ => Sigma.ext (add_zero _) (heq_of_eq (mul_one _))
mul_assoc := fun _ _ _ => Sigma.ext (add_assoc _ _ _) (heq_of_eq (mul_assoc _ _ _))
gnpow := fun n _ a => a ^ n
gnpow_zero' := fun _ => Sigma.ext (zero_nsmul _) (heq_of_eq (Monoid.npow_zero _))
gnpow_succ' := fun _ ⟨_, _⟩ => Sigma.ext (succ_nsmul _ _) (heq_of_eq (Monoid.npow_succ _ _)) }
/-- If all grades are the same type and themselves form a commutative monoid, then there is a
trivial grading structure. -/
instance CommMonoid.gCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid ι] [CommMonoid R] :
GradedMonoid.GCommMonoid fun _ : ι => R :=
{ Monoid.gMonoid ι with
| mul_comm := fun _ _ => Sigma.ext (add_comm _ _) (heq_of_eq (mul_comm _ _)) }
/-- When all the indexed types are the same, the dependent product is just the regular product. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GradedMonoid.lean | 462 | 465 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
/-!
# Results about division in extended non-negative reals
This file establishes basic properties related to the inversion and division operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
For instance, as a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation
with integer exponent.
## Main results
A few order isomorphisms are worthy of mention:
- `OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ`: The map `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an order isomorphism to the dual.
- `orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`: The birational order isomorphism between
`ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` given by `x ↦ (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹` with inverse
`x ↦ (x⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹`
- `orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a`: Order isomorphism between an initial
interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0` given by the identity map.
- `orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`: An order isomorphism between
the extended nonnegative real numbers and the unit interval. This is `orderIsoIicOneBirational`
composed with the identity order isomorphism between `Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` and `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by
simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hr, coe_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ h0
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b * b⁻¹ = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
| obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 128 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
/-!
# Probability density function
This file defines the probability density function of random variables, by which we mean
measurable functions taking values in a Borel space. The probability density function is defined
as the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the law of `X`. In particular, a measurable function `f`
is said to the probability density function of a random variable `X` if for all measurable
sets `S`, `ℙ(X ∈ S) = ∫ x in S, f x dx`. Probability density functions are one way of describing
the distribution of a random variable, and are useful for calculating probabilities and
finding moments (although the latter is better achieved with moment generating functions).
This file also defines the continuous uniform distribution and proves some properties about
random variables with this distribution.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.HasPDF` : A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to `HasPDF` with
respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E` if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X`
is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ` and they `HaveLebesgueDecomposition`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf` : If `X` is a random variable that `HasPDF X ℙ μ`, then `pdf X`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform` : A random variable `X` is said to follow the uniform
distribution if it has a constant probability density function with a compact, non-null support.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_pdf_smul` : Law of the unconscious statistician,
i.e. if a random variable `X : Ω → E` has pdf `f`, then `𝔼(g(X)) = ∫ x, f x • g x dx` for
all measurable `g : E → F`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.integral_mul_eq_integral` : A real-valued random variable `X` with
pdf `f` has expectation `∫ x, x * f x dx`.
* `MeasureTheory.pdf.IsUniform.integral_eq` : If `X` follows the uniform distribution with
its pdf having support `s`, then `X` has expectation `(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x dx` where `λ`
is the Lebesgue measure.
## TODO
Ultimately, we would also like to define characteristic functions to describe distributions as
it exists for all random variables. However, to define this, we will need Fourier transforms
which we currently do not have.
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E]
/-- A random variable `X : Ω → E` is said to have a probability density function (`HasPDF`)
with respect to the measure `ℙ` on `Ω` and `μ` on `E`
if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`
and they have a Lebesgue decomposition (`HaveLebesgueDecomposition`). -/
class HasPDF {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
Prop where
protected aemeasurable' : AEMeasurable X ℙ
protected haveLebesgueDecomposition' : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
protected absolutelyContinuous' : map X ℙ ≪ μ
section HasPDF
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X Y : Ω → E} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
theorem hasPDF_iff :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ AEMeasurable X ℙ ∧ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩⟩
theorem hasPDF_iff_of_aemeasurable (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) :
HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hasPDF_iff]
simp only [hX, true_and]
variable (X ℙ μ) in
@[measurability]
theorem HasPDF.aemeasurable [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : AEMeasurable X ℙ := HasPDF.aemeasurable' μ
instance HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : (map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ :=
HasPDF.haveLebesgueDecomposition'
theorem HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous [HasPDF X ℙ μ] : map X ℙ ≪ μ := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous'
/-- A random variable that `HasPDF` is quasi-measure preserving. -/
theorem HasPDF.quasiMeasurePreserving_of_measurable (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E)
[HasPDF X ℙ μ] (h : Measurable X) : QuasiMeasurePreserving X ℙ μ :=
{ measurable := h
absolutelyContinuous := HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous .. }
theorem HasPDF.congr (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] : HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨(HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ).congr hXY, ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.haveLebesgueDecomposition,
ℙ.map_congr hXY ▸ hX.absolutelyContinuous⟩
theorem HasPDF.congr_iff (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) : HasPDF X ℙ μ ↔ HasPDF Y ℙ μ :=
⟨fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY, fun _ ↦ HasPDF.congr hXY.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias HasPDF.congr' := HasPDF.congr_iff
/-- X `HasPDF` if there is a pdf `f` such that `map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f`. -/
theorem hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) (f : E → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨hX, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [h]
· rw [withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
exact haveLebesgueDecomposition_withDensity μ hf.measurable_mk
· exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f
end HasPDF
/-- If `X` is a random variable, then `pdf X ℙ μ`
is the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` with respect to `μ`. -/
def pdf {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :
E → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ
theorem pdf_def {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
pdf X ℙ μ = (map X ℙ).rnDeriv μ := rfl
theorem pdf_of_not_aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
{X : Ω → E} (hX : ¬AEMeasurable X ℙ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [pdf_def, map_of_not_aemeasurable hX]
exact rnDeriv_zero μ
theorem pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
{μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} (h : ¬(map X ℙ).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ) : pdf X ℙ μ = 0 :=
rnDeriv_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition h
theorem aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
(X : Ω → E) (h : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
contrapose! h
exact pdf_of_not_aemeasurable h
theorem hasPDF_of_pdf_ne_zero {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E}
(hac : map X ℙ ≪ μ) (hpdf : ¬pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, hac⟩
· exact aemeasurable_of_pdf_ne_zero X hpdf
· contrapose! hpdf
have := pdf_of_not_haveLebesgueDecomposition hpdf
filter_upwards using congrFun this
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : Measurable (pdf X ℙ μ) := by
exact measurable_rnDeriv _ _
theorem withDensity_pdf_le_map {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : μ.withDensity (pdf X ℙ μ) ≤ map X ℙ :=
withDensity_rnDeriv_le _ _
theorem setLIntegral_pdf_le_map {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) (s : Set E) :
∫⁻ x in s, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ ≤ map X ℙ s := by
apply (withDensity_apply_le _ s).trans
exact withDensity_pdf_le_map _ _ _ s
theorem map_eq_withDensity_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] :
map X ℙ = μ.withDensity (pdf X ℙ μ) := by
rw [pdf_def, withDensity_rnDeriv_eq _ _ hX.absolutelyContinuous]
theorem map_eq_setLIntegral_pdf {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → E) (ℙ : Measure Ω)
(μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) [hX : HasPDF X ℙ μ] {s : Set E}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : map X ℙ s = ∫⁻ x in s, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ := by
rw [← withDensity_apply _ hs, map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ]
namespace pdf
variable {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω} {μ : Measure E}
protected theorem congr {X Y : Ω → E} (hXY : X =ᵐ[ℙ] Y) : pdf X ℙ μ = pdf Y ℙ μ := by
rw [pdf_def, pdf_def, map_congr hXY]
theorem lintegral_eq_measure_univ {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] :
∫⁻ x, pdf X ℙ μ x ∂μ = ℙ Set.univ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_univ, ← map_eq_setLIntegral_pdf X ℙ μ MeasurableSet.univ,
map_apply_of_aemeasurable (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ) MeasurableSet.univ, Set.preimage_univ]
theorem eq_of_map_eq_withDensity [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] (f : E → ℝ≥0∞)
(hmf : AEMeasurable f μ) : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f ↔ pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ]
apply withDensity_eq_iff (measurable_pdf X ℙ μ).aemeasurable hmf
rw [lintegral_eq_measure_univ]
exact measure_ne_top _ _
theorem eq_of_map_eq_withDensity' [SigmaFinite μ] {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] (f : E → ℝ≥0∞)
(hmf : AEMeasurable f μ) : map X ℙ = μ.withDensity f ↔ pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] f :=
map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ ▸
withDensity_eq_iff_of_sigmaFinite (measurable_pdf X ℙ μ).aemeasurable hmf
nonrec theorem ae_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {μ : Measure E} {X : Ω → E} :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, pdf X ℙ μ x < ∞ :=
rnDeriv_lt_top (map X ℙ) μ
nonrec theorem ofReal_toReal_ae_eq [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {X : Ω → E} :
(fun x => ENNReal.ofReal (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] pdf X ℙ μ :=
ofReal_toReal_ae_eq ae_lt_top
section IntegralPDFMul
/-- **The Law of the Unconscious Statistician** for nonnegative random variables. -/
theorem lintegral_pdf_mul {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] {f : E → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : ∫⁻ x, pdf X ℙ μ x * f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f (X x) ∂ℙ := by
rw [pdf_def,
← lintegral_map' (hf.mono_ac HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous) (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ),
lintegral_rnDeriv_mul HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous hf]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
theorem integrable_pdf_smul_iff [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] {f : E → F}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Integrable (fun x => (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal • f x) μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => f (X x)) ℙ := by
rw [← Function.comp_def,
← integrable_map_measure (hf.mono_ac HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous) (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ),
map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ, pdf_def, integrable_rnDeriv_smul_iff HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous]
rw [withDensity_rnDeriv_eq _ _ HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous]
/-- **The Law of the Unconscious Statistician**: Given a random variable `X` and a measurable
function `f`, `f ∘ X` is a random variable with expectation `∫ x, pdf X x • f x ∂μ`
where `μ` is a measure on the codomain of `X`. -/
theorem integral_pdf_smul [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] {X : Ω → E} [HasPDF X ℙ μ] {f : E → F}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : ∫ x, (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal • f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f (X x) ∂ℙ := by
rw [← integral_map (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ) (hf.mono_ac HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous),
map_eq_withDensity_pdf X ℙ μ, pdf_def, integral_rnDeriv_smul HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous,
withDensity_rnDeriv_eq _ _ HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous]
end IntegralPDFMul
section
variable {F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace F] {ν : Measure F} (X : Ω → E) [HasPDF X ℙ μ] {g : E → F}
/-- A random variable that `HasPDF` transformed under a `QuasiMeasurePreserving`
map also `HasPDF` if `(map g (map X ℙ)).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ`.
`quasiMeasurePreserving_hasPDF` is more useful in the case we are working with a
probability measure and a real-valued random variable. -/
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_hasPDF (hg : QuasiMeasurePreserving g μ ν)
(hmap : (map g (map X ℙ)).HaveLebesgueDecomposition ν) : HasPDF (g ∘ X) ℙ ν := by
have hgm : AEMeasurable g (map X ℙ) := hg.aemeasurable.mono_ac HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous
rw [hasPDF_iff, ← AEMeasurable.map_map_of_aemeasurable hgm (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ)]
refine ⟨hg.measurable.comp_aemeasurable (HasPDF.aemeasurable _ _ μ), hmap, ?_⟩
exact (HasPDF.absolutelyContinuous.map hg.1).trans hg.2
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_hasPDF' [SFinite ℙ] [SigmaFinite ν]
(hg : QuasiMeasurePreserving g μ ν) : HasPDF (g ∘ X) ℙ ν :=
quasiMeasurePreserving_hasPDF X hg inferInstance
end
section Real
variable {X : Ω → ℝ}
nonrec theorem _root_.Real.hasPDF_iff [SFinite ℙ] :
HasPDF X ℙ ↔ AEMeasurable X ℙ ∧ map X ℙ ≪ volume := by
rw [hasPDF_iff, and_iff_right (inferInstance : HaveLebesgueDecomposition _ _)]
/-- A real-valued random variable `X` `HasPDF X ℙ λ` (where `λ` is the Lebesgue measure) if and
only if the push-forward measure of `ℙ` along `X` is absolutely continuous with respect to `λ`. -/
nonrec theorem _root_.Real.hasPDF_iff_of_aemeasurable [SFinite ℙ] (hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ) :
HasPDF X ℙ ↔ map X ℙ ≪ volume := by
rw [Real.hasPDF_iff, and_iff_right hX]
variable [IsFiniteMeasure ℙ]
/-- If `X` is a real-valued random variable that has pdf `f`, then the expectation of `X` equals
`∫ x, x * f x ∂λ` where `λ` is the Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem integral_mul_eq_integral [HasPDF X ℙ] : ∫ x, x * (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal = ∫ x, X x ∂ℙ :=
calc
_ = ∫ x, (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal * x := by congr with x; exact mul_comm _ _
_ = _ := integral_pdf_smul measurable_id.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_mul {f : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : pdf X ℙ =ᵐ[volume] g)
(hgi : ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖ₑ * g x ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral fun x => f x * (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal := by
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm]
have : (fun x => ‖f x‖ₑ * g x) =ᵐ[volume] fun x => ‖f x * (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal‖ₑ := by
refine ae_eq_trans ((ae_eq_refl _).mul (ae_eq_trans hg.symm ofReal_toReal_ae_eq.symm)) ?_
simp_rw [← smul_eq_mul, enorm_smul, smul_eq_mul]
refine .mul (ae_eq_refl _) ?_
simp only [Real.enorm_eq_ofReal ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ae_eq_refl]
rwa [lt_top_iff_ne_top, ← lintegral_congr_ae this]
end Real
section TwoVariables
open ProbabilityTheory
variable {F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace F] {ν : Measure F} {X : Ω → E} {Y : Ω → F}
/-- Random variables are independent iff their joint density is a product of marginal densities. -/
theorem indepFun_iff_pdf_prod_eq_pdf_mul_pdf
[IsFiniteMeasure ℙ] [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] [HasPDF (fun ω ↦ (X ω, Y ω)) ℙ (μ.prod ν)] :
IndepFun X Y ℙ ↔
pdf (fun ω ↦ (X ω, Y ω)) ℙ (μ.prod ν) =ᵐ[μ.prod ν] fun z ↦ pdf X ℙ μ z.1 * pdf Y ℙ ν z.2 := by
have : HasPDF X ℙ μ := quasiMeasurePreserving_hasPDF' (μ := μ.prod ν) (fun ω ↦ (X ω, Y ω))
quasiMeasurePreserving_fst
have : HasPDF Y ℙ ν := quasiMeasurePreserving_hasPDF' (μ := μ.prod ν) (fun ω ↦ (X ω, Y ω))
quasiMeasurePreserving_snd
have h₀ : (ℙ.map X).prod (ℙ.map Y) =
(μ.prod ν).withDensity fun z ↦ pdf X ℙ μ z.1 * pdf Y ℙ ν z.2 :=
prod_eq fun s t hs ht ↦ by rw [withDensity_apply _ (hs.prod ht), ← prod_restrict,
lintegral_prod_mul (measurable_pdf X ℙ μ).aemeasurable (measurable_pdf Y ℙ ν).aemeasurable,
map_eq_setLIntegral_pdf X ℙ μ hs, map_eq_setLIntegral_pdf Y ℙ ν ht]
rw [indepFun_iff_map_prod_eq_prod_map_map (HasPDF.aemeasurable X ℙ μ) (HasPDF.aemeasurable Y ℙ ν),
← eq_of_map_eq_withDensity, h₀]
exact (((measurable_pdf X ℙ μ).comp measurable_fst).mul
((measurable_pdf Y ℙ ν).comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
end TwoVariables
end pdf
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Density.lean | 326 | 329 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter hiding map
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
The measure of a set `s`, denoted `μ s`, is an extended nonnegative real. The real-valued version
is written `μ.real s`.
-/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
/-- Notation for `Measure` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra in the domain. -/
scoped notation "Measure[" mα "] " α:arg => @Measure α mα
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := measure_empty (μ := m.toOuterMeasure)
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
/-- The real-valued version of a measure. Maps infinite measure sets to zero. Use as `μ.real s`.
The API is developed in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real`. -/
protected def Measure.real {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
(μ s).toReal
theorem measureReal_def {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.real s = (μ s).toReal := rfl
alias Measure.real_def := measureReal_def
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by
rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- A variant of `measure_eq_iInf` which has a single `iInf`. This is useful when applying a
lemma next that only works for non-empty infima, in which case you can use
`nonempty_measurable_superset`. -/
theorem measure_eq_iInf' (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = ⨅ t : { t // s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t }, μ t := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_and, ← measure_eq_iInf]
theorem measure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ s = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
theorem toOuterMeasure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ.toOuterMeasure = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
theorem measure_eq_extend (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ s = extend (fun t (_ht : MeasurableSet t) => μ t) s := by
rw [extend_eq]
exact hs
theorem nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (h : μ s ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ measure_empty
| theorem measure_mono_top (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : μ s₁ = ∞) : μ s₂ = ∞ :=
top_unique <| h₁ ▸ measure_mono h
@[simp, mono]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 187 | 190 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on finsets
## Main definitions
- `Finset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
- `Finset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
## Implementation notes
Many of the proofs use the lemmas `gcd_def` and `lcm_def`, which relate `Finset.gcd`
and `Finset.lcm` to `Multiset.gcd` and `Multiset.lcm`.
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `Data.Finset.Lattice`
## Tags
finset, gcd
-/
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a finite set -/
def lcm (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.lcm 1 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_empty : (∅ : Finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
@[simp]
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.lcm_dvd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2
theorem dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
@[simp]
theorem lcm_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (f b) (s.lcm f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(lcm_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.lcm f) (Multiset.normalize_lcm (s.1.map f))).2 (dvd_lcm h)]
apply fold_insert h
@[simp]
theorem lcm_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).lcm f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.lcm_singleton
@[local simp] -- This will later be provable by other `simp` lemmas.
theorem normalize_lcm : normalize (s.lcm f) = s.lcm f := by simp [lcm_def]
theorem lcm_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (s₁.lcm f) (s₂.lcm f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, lcm_empty, lcm_one_left, normalize_lcm])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, lcm_insert, lcm_insert, ih, lcm_assoc]
theorem lcm_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.lcm f = s₂.lcm g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
theorem lcm_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.lcm f ∣ s.lcm g :=
lcm_dvd fun b hb ↦ (h b hb).trans (dvd_lcm hb)
theorem lcm_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.lcm f ∣ s₂.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd fun _ hb ↦ dvd_lcm (h hb)
theorem lcm_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).lcm f = s.lcm (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction s using Finset.induction <;> simp [*]
theorem lcm_eq_lcm_image [DecidableEq α] : s.lcm f = (s.image f).lcm id :=
Eq.symm <| lcm_image _
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial α] : s.lcm f = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ f '' s := by
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, lcm_def, Multiset.lcm_eq_zero_iff, Set.mem_image, mem_coe, ←
Finset.mem_def]
end lcm
/-! ### gcd -/
section gcd
/-- Greatest common divisor of a finite set -/
def gcd (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.gcd 0 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem gcd_def : s.gcd f = (s.1.map f).gcd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem gcd_empty : (∅ : Finset β).gcd f = 0 :=
fold_empty
theorem dvd_gcd_iff {a : α} : a ∣ s.gcd f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.dvd_gcd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem gcd_dvd {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.gcd f ∣ f b :=
dvd_gcd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
theorem dvd_gcd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b) → a ∣ s.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd_iff.2
@[simp]
theorem gcd_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (f b) (s.gcd f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(gcd_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.gcd f) (Multiset.normalize_gcd (s.1.map f))).2 (gcd_dvd h)]
apply fold_insert h
@[simp]
theorem gcd_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).gcd f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.gcd_singleton
@[local simp] -- This will later be provable by other `simp` lemmas.
theorem normalize_gcd : normalize (s.gcd f) = s.gcd f := by simp [gcd_def]
theorem gcd_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (s₁.gcd f) (s₂.gcd f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, gcd_empty, gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, gcd_insert, gcd_insert, ih, gcd_assoc]
theorem gcd_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.gcd f = s₂.gcd g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
theorem gcd_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.gcd f ∣ s.gcd g :=
dvd_gcd fun b hb ↦ (gcd_dvd hb).trans (h b hb)
theorem gcd_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.gcd f ∣ s₁.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd fun _ hb ↦ gcd_dvd (h hb)
theorem gcd_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).gcd f = s.gcd (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction s using Finset.induction <;> simp [*]
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_image [DecidableEq α] : s.gcd f = (s.image f).gcd id :=
Eq.symm <| gcd_image _
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff : s.gcd f = 0 ↔ ∀ x : β, x ∈ s → f x = 0 := by
rw [gcd_def, Multiset.gcd_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· intro b bs
apply h (f b)
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, mem_def.1 bs]
use b
simp only [mem_def.1 bs, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
· intro a as
rw [Multiset.mem_map] at as
rcases as with ⟨b, ⟨bs, rfl⟩⟩
apply h b (mem_def.1 bs)
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_filter_ne_zero [DecidablePred fun x : β ↦ f x = 0] :
s.gcd f = {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0}.gcd f := by
classical
trans ({x ∈ s | f x = 0} ∪ {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0}).gcd f
· rw [filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
rw [gcd_union]
refine Eq.trans (?_ : _ = GCDMonoid.gcd (0 : α) ?_) (?_ : GCDMonoid.gcd (0 : α) _ = _)
· exact gcd {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0} f
· refine congr (congr rfl <| s.induction_on ?_ ?_) (by simp)
· simp
· intro a s _ h
rw [filter_insert]
split_ifs with h1 <;> simp [h, h1]
simp only [gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd]
nonrec theorem gcd_mul_left {a : α} : (s.gcd fun x ↦ a * f x) = normalize a * s.gcd f := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro b t _ h
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, h, ← gcd_mul_left]
apply ((normalize_associated a).mul_right _).gcd_eq_right
nonrec theorem gcd_mul_right {a : α} : (s.gcd fun x ↦ f x * a) = s.gcd f * normalize a := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro b t _ h
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, h, ← gcd_mul_right]
apply ((normalize_associated a).mul_left _).gcd_eq_right
theorem extract_gcd' (f g : β → α) (hs : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x ≠ 0)
(hg : ∀ b ∈ s, f b = s.gcd f * g b) : s.gcd g = 1 :=
((@mul_right_eq_self₀ _ _ (s.gcd f) _).1 <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← normalize_gcd, ← gcd_mul_left, ← gcd_congr rfl hg]).resolve_right <| by
contrapose! hs
exact gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 hs
theorem extract_gcd (f : β → α) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ g : β → α, (∀ b ∈ s, f b = s.gcd f * g b) ∧ s.gcd g = 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = (0 : α)
· refine ⟨fun _ ↦ 1, fun b hb ↦ by rw [h b hb, gcd_eq_zero_iff.2 h, mul_one], ?_⟩
rw [gcd_eq_gcd_image, image_const hs, gcd_singleton, id, normalize_one]
· choose g' hg using @gcd_dvd _ _ _ _ s f
push_neg at h
refine ⟨fun b ↦ if hb : b ∈ s then g' hb else 0, fun b hb ↦ ?_,
extract_gcd' f _ h fun b hb ↦ ?_⟩
· simp only [hb, hg, dite_true]
rw [dif_pos hb, hg hb]
variable [Div α] [MulDivCancelClass α] {f : ι → α} {s : Finset ι} {i : ι}
/-- Given a nonempty Finset `s` and a function `f` from `s` to `ℕ`, if `d = s.gcd`,
then the `gcd` of `(f i) / d` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma gcd_div_eq_one (his : i ∈ s) (hfi : f i ≠ 0) : s.gcd (fun j ↦ f j / s.gcd f) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨g, he, hg⟩ := Finset.extract_gcd f ⟨i, his⟩
refine (Finset.gcd_congr rfl fun a ha ↦ ?_).trans hg
rw [he a ha, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
exact mt Finset.gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h ↦ hfi <| h i his
lemma gcd_div_id_eq_one {s : Finset α} {a : α} (has : a ∈ s) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
s.gcd (fun b ↦ b / s.gcd id) = 1 := gcd_div_eq_one has ha
| end gcd
end Finset
namespace Finset
section IsDomain
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Finset.lean | 253 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 2,081 | 2,083 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Finite
/-!
# Factorization of ideals and fractional ideals of Dedekind domains
Every nonzero ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product `∏_v v^{n_v}` over the
maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are natural numbers.
Similarly, every nonzero fractional ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product
`∏_v v^{n_v}` over the maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are integers. We define
`FractionalIdeal.count K v I` (abbreviated as `val_v(I)` in the documentation) to be `n_v`, and we
prove some of its properties. If `I = 0`, we define `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main definitions
- `FractionalIdeal.count` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of
`R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we
set `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main results
- `Ideal.finite_factors` : Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal.
- `Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : The ideal `I` equals the finprod
`∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, where `val_v(I)` denotes the multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`
and `v` runs over the maximal ideals of `R`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal,
`a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization'` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional
ideal, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal` : For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`,
the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finite_factors` : If `I ≠ 0`, then `val_v(I) = 0` for all but finitely many
maximal ideals of `R`.
## Implementation notes
Since we are only interested in the factorization of nonzero fractional ideals, we define
`val_v(0) = 0` so that every `val_v` is in `ℤ` and we can avoid having to use `WithTop ℤ`.
## Tags
dedekind domain, fractional ideal, ideal, factorization
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-! ### Factorization of ideals of Dedekind domains -/
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a maximal ideal `v` and an ideal `I` of `R`, `maxPowDividing` returns the maximal
power of `v` dividing `I`. -/
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
/-- Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal. -/
theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw)
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that the
multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`, denoted `val_v(I)`, is nonzero. -/
theorem Associates.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite,
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0 := by
have h_supp : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | ¬((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0} = {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I} := by
ext v
simp_rw [Int.natCast_eq_zero]
exact Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd hI v.irreducible
rw [Filter.eventually_cofinite, h_supp]
exact Ideal.finite_factors hI
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => v.maxPowDividing I).Finite :=
haveI h_subset : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 1} ⊆
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R |
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) ≠ 0} := by
intro v hv h_zero
have hv' : v.maxPowDividing I = 1 := by
rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, Int.natCast_eq_zero.mp h_zero,
pow_zero _]
exact hv hv'
Finite.subset (Filter.eventually_cofinite.mp (Associates.finite_factors hI)) h_subset
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))`, regarded as a fractional ideal, is not `(1)`. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [Ne, zpow_natCast, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^-(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_inv {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
(-((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ))).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [zpow_neg, Ne, inv_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport_coe hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, `v^(val_v(I) + 1)` does not divide `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_not_dvd (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) :
¬v.asIdeal ^ ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors + 1) ∣
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I := by
have hf := finite_mulSupport hI
have h_ne_zero : v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
rw [← mul_finprod_cond_ne v hf, pow_add, pow_one, finprod_cond_ne _ _ hf]
intro h_contr
have hv_prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw'⟩ :=
Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd hv_prime ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h_ne_zero).mp h_contr)
have hw_prime : Prime w.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime w.ne_bot w.isPrime
have hvw := Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow hv_prime hvw'
rw [Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated hv_prime hw_prime, associated_iff_eq] at hvw
exact (Finset.mem_erase.mp hw).1 (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw.symm)
end Ideal
theorem Associates.finprod_ne_zero (I : Ideal R) :
Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I) ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, finprod_def]
split_ifs
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro v _
apply pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
· exact one_ne_zero
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of `v` in `∏_v v^(val_v(I))` equals `val_v(I)`. -/
theorem finprod_count (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) : (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I)).factors =
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors := by
have h_ne_zero := Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := v.associates_irreducible
have h_dvd := finprod_mem_dvd v (Ideal.finite_mulSupport hI)
have h_not_dvd := Ideal.finprod_not_dvd v I hI
simp only [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing] at h_dvd h_ne_zero h_not_dvd
rw [← Associates.mk_dvd_mk] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [Associates.mk_pow, Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h_ne_zero hv] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [not_le] at h_not_dvd
apply Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ h_dvd h_not_dvd
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I = I := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq, ← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
classical
apply Associates.eq_of_eq_counts
· apply Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
· apply Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
intro v hv
obtain ⟨J, hJv⟩ := Associates.exists_rep v
rw [← hJv, Associates.irreducible_mk] at hv
rw [← hJv]
apply Ideal.finprod_count
⟨J, Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (irreducible_iff_prime.mp hv), Irreducible.ne_zero hv⟩ I hI
variable (K)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, when both sides are regarded as fractional
ideals of `R`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)) = I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization hI]
rw [FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_finprod R⁰ K (le_refl _)]
simp_rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow,
zpow_natCast]
end Ideal
/-! ### Factorization of fractional ideals of Dedekind domains -/
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Int IsLocalization
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) = I := by
have hJ_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have hJ := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K hJ_ne_zero
have ha_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have ha := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K ha_ne_zero
rw [haJ, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← hJ, ← ha,
← finprod_inv_distrib]
simp_rw [← zpow_neg]
rw [← finprod_mul_distrib (Ideal.finite_mulSupport_coe hJ_ne_zero)
(Ideal.finite_mulSupport_inv ha_ne_zero)]
apply finprod_congr
intro v
rw [← zpow_add₀ ((@coeIdeal_ne_zero R _ K _ _ _ _).mpr v.ne_bot), sub_eq_add_neg]
open scoped Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction {n : R} (hn : n ≠ 0) (d : ↥R⁰) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑d : R)}) :
Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) := by
have hd_ne_zero : (algebraMap R K) (d : R) ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ (IsFractionRing.injective R K) d.property
have h0 : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) ≠ 0 := by
rw [spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨(map_ne_zero_iff (algebraMap R K) (IsFractionRing.injective R K)).mpr hn, hd_ne_zero⟩
have hI : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) d)⁻¹ * ↑(Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R) := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
apply congr_arg
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
exact finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization h0 hI
open Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0)
(k : K) (hk : I = spanSingleton R⁰ k) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose
(mk'_surjective R⁰ k)} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑(choose
(choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)) : ↥R⁰) : R)}) : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = I := by
set n : R := choose (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)
set d : ↥R⁰ := choose (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hnd : mk' K n d = k := choose_spec (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
rw [← hnd, h, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, map_zero, zero_div, spanSingleton_zero] at hk
exact hI hk
rw [finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction hn0 d, hk, hnd]
variable (K)
open Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`,
then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we set `val_v(I) = 0`. -/
def count (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) : ℤ :=
dite (I = 0) (fun _ : I = 0 => 0) fun _ : ¬I = 0 =>
let a := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
let J := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ)
/-- val_v(0) = 0. -/
lemma count_zero : count K v (0 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by simp only [count, dif_pos]
open Classical in
lemma count_ne_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk
(choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)))).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)})).factors : ℤ) := by
simp only [count, dif_neg hI]
open Classical in
/-- `val_v(I)` does not depend on the choice of `a` and `J` used to represent `I`. -/
theorem count_well_defined {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (h_aJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) := by
set a₁ := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
set J₁ := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
have h_a₁J₁ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁)⁻¹ * ↑J₁ :=
(choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).2
have h_a₁_ne_zero : a₁ ≠ 0 := (choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).1
have h_J₁_ne_zero : J₁ ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_a₁J₁
have h_a_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_J_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_a₁' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
have h_a' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
rw [ne_eq, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at h_a_ne_zero
exact h_a_ne_zero
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by
exact Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
rw [h_a₁J₁, ← div_spanSingleton, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_div_iff h_a₁' h_a',
← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_mul, ← coeIdeal_mul] at h_aJ
rw [count, dif_neg hI, sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, ← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_add,
natCast_inj, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.mk_mul_mk, coeIdeal_injective h_aJ]
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_a_ne_zero
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. -/
theorem count_mul {I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hI' : I' ≠ 0) :
count K v (I * I') = count K v I + count K v I' := by
classical
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, haJ⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
have ha_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha
have hJ_ne_zero : Associates.mk J ≠ 0 := Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ)
obtain ⟨a', J', ha', haJ'⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I'
have ha'_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a'} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha'
have hJ'_ne_zero : Associates.mk J' ≠ 0 :=
Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI' haJ')
have h_prod : I * I' = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) (a * a'))⁻¹ * ↑(J * J') := by
rw [haJ, haJ', mul_assoc, mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K), mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, coeIdeal_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_inv,
mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)]
rw [count_well_defined K v hI haJ, count_well_defined K v hI' haJ',
count_well_defined K v (mul_ne_zero hI hI') h_prod, ← Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.count_mul hJ_ne_zero hJ'_ne_zero hv, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton,
← Associates.mk_mul_mk, Associates.count_mul ha_ne_zero ha'_ne_zero hv]
push_cast
ring
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. If `I` or `I'` is zero, then
`val_v(I*I') = 0`. -/
theorem count_mul' (I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) [Decidable (I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0)] :
count K v (I * I') = if I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0 then count K v I + count K v I' else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_mul K v h.1 h.2
· push_neg at h
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
· rw [h hI, MulZeroClass.mul_zero, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
/-- val_v(1) = 0. -/
theorem count_one : count K v (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have h1 : (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑(1 : Ideal R) := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, coeIdeal_top, mul_one, inv_one,
spanSingleton_one]
rw [count_well_defined K v one_ne_zero h1, Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, sub_self]
theorem count_prod {ι} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) (hS : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0) :
count K v (∏ i ∈ s, I i) = ∑ i ∈ s, count K v (I i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s hi hrec
· rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty, count_one]
· have hS' : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := fun j hj => hS j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)
have hS0 : ∏ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr hS'
have hi0 : I i ≠ 0 := hS i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)
rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, Finset.sum_insert hi, count_mul K v hi0 hS0, hrec hS']
/-- For every `n ∈ ℕ` and every ideal `I`, `val_v(I^n) = n*val_v(I)`. -/
theorem count_pow (n : ℕ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
induction' n with n h
· rw [pow_zero, ofNat_zero, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count_one]
· classical rw [pow_succ, count_mul']
by_cases hI : I = 0
· have h_neg : ¬(I ^ n ≠ 0 ∧ I ≠ 0) := by
rw [not_and', not_not, ne_eq]
intro h
exact absurd hI h
rw [if_neg h_neg, hI, count_zero, MulZeroClass.mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (And.intro (pow_ne_zero n hI) hI), h, Nat.cast_add,
Nat.cast_one]
ring
/-- `val_v(v) = 1`, when `v` is regarded as a fractional ideal. -/
theorem count_self : count K v (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 := by
have hv : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr v.ne_bot
have h_self : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑v.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hv_irred : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
classical rw [count_well_defined K v hv h_self, Associates.count_self hv_irred,
Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top, Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one,
Associates.count_zero hv_irred, ofNat_zero, sub_zero, ofNat_one]
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℕ`. -/
theorem count_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by
rw [count_pow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- `val_v(I⁻ⁿ) = -val_v(Iⁿ)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_neg_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ (-n)) = - count K v (I ^ n) := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, neg_zero, zpow_zero, count_one, neg_zero]
· rw [hI, zero_zpow n hn, zero_zpow (-n) (neg_ne_zero.mpr hn), count_zero, neg_zero]
· rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← count_mul K v (zpow_ne_zero _ hI) (zpow_ne_zero _ hI),
← zpow_add₀ hI, neg_add_cancel, zpow_zero]
exact count_one K v
theorem count_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I⁻¹) = - count K v I := by
rw [← zpow_neg_one, count_neg_zpow K v (1 : ℤ) I, zpow_one]
/-- `val_v(Iⁿ) = n*val_v(I)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
obtain n | n := n
· rw [ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact count_pow K v n I
· rw [negSucc_eq, count_neg_zpow, ← Int.natCast_succ, zpow_natCast, count_pow]
ring
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_zpow_self (n : ℤ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by
rw [count_zpow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- If `v ≠ w` are two maximal ideals of `R`, then `val_v(w) = 0`. -/
theorem count_maximal_coprime {w : HeightOneSpectrum R} (hw : w ≠ v) :
count K v (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have hw_fact : (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑w.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hw_ne_zero : (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr w.ne_bot
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
have hw' : Irreducible (Associates.mk w.asIdeal) := by apply w.associates_irreducible
classical
rw [count_well_defined K v hw_ne_zero hw_fact, Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top,
Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one, Associates.count_zero hv, ofNat_zero, sub_zero,
natCast_eq_zero, ← pow_one (Associates.mk w.asIdeal), Associates.factors_prime_pow hw',
Associates.count_some hv, Multiset.replicate_one, Multiset.count_eq_zero,
Multiset.mem_singleton]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq]
rw [Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, associated_iff_eq, ← HeightOneSpectrum.ext_iff]
exact Ne.symm hw
theorem count_maximal (w : HeightOneSpectrum R) [Decidable (w = v)] :
count K v (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = if w = v then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, count_self]
· exact count_maximal_coprime K v h
/-- `val_v(∏_{w ≠ v} w^{exps w}) = 0`. -/
theorem count_finprod_coprime (exps : HeightOneSpectrum R → ℤ) :
count K v (∏ᶠ (w : HeightOneSpectrum R) (_ : w ≠ v),
(w.asIdeal : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) ^ exps w) = 0 := by
apply finprod_mem_induction fun I => count K v I = 0
· exact count_one K v
· intro I I' hI hI'
classical
by_cases h : I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0
· rw [count_mul' K v, if_pos h, hI, hI', add_zero]
· rw [count_mul' K v, if_neg h]
· intro w hw
rw [count_zpow, count_maximal_coprime K v hw, MulZeroClass.mul_zero]
theorem count_finsuppProd (exps : HeightOneSpectrum R →₀ ℤ) :
count K v (exps.prod (HeightOneSpectrum.asIdeal · ^ ·)) = exps v := by
rw [Finsupp.prod, count_prod]
· classical simp only [count_zpow, count_maximal, mul_ite, mul_one, mul_zero, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
exps.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_not, ite_eq_right_iff, @eq_comm ℤ 0, imp_self]
· exact fun v hv ↦ zpow_ne_zero _ (coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr v.ne_bot)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias count_finsupp_prod := count_finsuppProd
/-- If `exps` is finitely supported, then `val_v(∏_w w^{exps w}) = exps v`. -/
theorem count_finprod (exps : HeightOneSpectrum R → ℤ)
(h_exps : ∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite, exps v = 0) :
count K v (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R,
(v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ exps v) = exps v := by
convert count_finsuppProd K v (Finsupp.mk h_exps.toFinset exps (fun _ ↦ h_exps.mem_toFinset))
rw [finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (s := h_exps.toFinset), Finsupp.prod]
· rfl
· rw [Finite.coe_toFinset]
intro v hv h
rw [mem_mulSupport, h, zpow_zero] at hv
exact hv (Eq.refl 1)
open scoped Classical in
theorem count_coe {J : Ideal R} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
count K v J = (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors := by
rw [count_well_defined K (J := J) (a := 1), Ideal.span_singleton_one, sub_eq_self,
Nat.cast_eq_zero, ← Ideal.one_eq_top, Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one,
Associates.count_zero v.associates_irreducible]
· simpa only [ne_eq, coeIdeal_eq_zero]
· simp only [map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
theorem count_coe_nonneg (J : Ideal R) : 0 ≤ count K v J := by
by_cases hJ : J = 0
· simp only [hJ, Submodule.zero_eq_bot, coeIdeal_bot, count_zero, le_refl]
· classical simp only [count_coe K v hJ, Nat.cast_nonneg]
theorem count_mono {I J} (hI : I ≠ 0) (h : I ≤ J) : count K v J ≤ count K v I := by
| by_cases hJ : J = 0
· exact (hI (FractionalIdeal.le_zero_iff.mp (h.trans hJ.le))).elim
have := FractionalIdeal.mul_le_mul_left h J⁻¹
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ hJ, FractionalIdeal.le_one_iff_exists_coeIdeal] at this
obtain ⟨J', hJ'⟩ := this
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ hJ I, ← hJ', count_mul K v hJ, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
· exact count_coe_nonneg K v J'
· exact hJ' ▸ mul_ne_zero (inv_ne_zero hJ) hI
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 522 | 529 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
/-!
# Higher differentiability over `ℝ` or `ℂ`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped NNReal Topology
section Real
/-!
### Results over `ℝ` or `ℂ`
The results in this section rely on the Mean Value Theorem, and therefore hold only over `ℝ` (and
its extension fields such as `ℂ`).
-/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {𝕂 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕂] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕂 E'] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕂 F']
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least 1, then at points in the interior of the
domain of definition, the term of order 1 of this series is a strict derivative of `f`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.hasStrictFDerivAt {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{s : Set E'} {f : E' → F'} {x : E'}
{p : E' → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕂 E' F'} (hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : HasStrictFDerivAt f ((continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕂 E' F') (p x 1)) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt (hf.eventually_hasFDerivAt hn hs) <|
(continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕂 E' F').continuousAt.comp <| (hf.cont 1 hn).continuousAt hs
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, and its derivative at that point is given to
us as `f'`, then `f'` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictFDerivAt' {f : E' → F'} {f' : E' →L[𝕂] F'} {x : E'}
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x) (hf' : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
rcases hf.of_le hn 1 le_rfl with ⟨u, H, p, hp⟩
simp only [nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, insert_eq_of_mem] at H
have := hp.hasStrictFDerivAt le_rfl H
rwa [hf'.unique this.hasFDerivAt]
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, and its derivative at that point is given to
us as `f'`, then `f'` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt' {f : 𝕂 → F'} {f' : F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x)
(hf' : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' hf' hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, then the derivative of `f` at this point
is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E' → F'} {x : E'} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕂 f x) x :=
hf.hasStrictFDerivAt' (hf.differentiableAt hn).hasFDerivAt hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, then the derivative of `f` at this point
is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f : 𝕂 → F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt hn).hasStrictDerivAt
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n`, then the derivative of `f` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiff.hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E' → F'} {x : E'} (hf : ContDiff 𝕂 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕂 f x) x :=
hf.contDiffAt.hasStrictFDerivAt hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n`, then the derivative of `f` is also a strict derivative. -/
theorem ContDiff.hasStrictDerivAt {f : 𝕂 → F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : ContDiff 𝕂 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
hf.contDiffAt.hasStrictDerivAt hn
/-- If `f` has a formal Taylor series `p` up to order `1` on `{x} ∪ s`, where `s` is a convex set,
and `‖p x 1‖₊ < K`, then `f` is `K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt {E F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E → F}
{p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries ℝ E F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn 1 f p (insert x s)) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (K : ℝ≥0)
(hK : ‖p x 1‖₊ < K) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t := by
set f' := fun y => continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 ℝ E F (p y 1)
have hder : ∀ y ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y := fun y hy =>
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt le_rfl (subset_insert x s hy)).mono (subset_insert x s)
have hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f' s x :=
(continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 ℝ E F).continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
((hf.cont _ le_rfl _ (mem_insert _ _)).mono (subset_insert x s))
replace hK : ‖f' x‖₊ < K := by simpa only [f', LinearIsometryEquiv.nnnorm_map]
exact
hs.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt
(eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| Eventually.of_forall hder) hcont K hK
/-- If `f` has a formal Taylor series `p` up to order `1` on `{x} ∪ s`, where `s` is a convex set,
then `f` is Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.exists_lipschitzOnWith {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E → F}
{p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries ℝ E F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn 1 f p (insert x s)) (hs : Convex ℝ s) :
∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t :=
(exists_gt _).imp <| hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt hs
/-- If `f` is `C^1` within a convex set `s` at `x`, then it is Lipschitz on a neighborhood of `x`
within `s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ 1 f s x) (hs : Convex ℝ s) :
∃ K : ℝ≥0, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t := by
rcases hf 1 le_rfl with ⟨t, hst, p, hp⟩
rcases Metric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.mp hst with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
replace hp : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn 1 f p (Metric.ball x ε ∩ insert x s) := hp.mono hε
clear hst hε t
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem (Metric.mem_ball_self ε0), ← insert_inter_distrib] at hp
rcases hp.exists_lipschitzOnWith ((convex_ball _ _).inter hs) with ⟨K, t, hst, hft⟩
| rw [inter_comm, ← nhdsWithin_restrict' _ (Metric.ball_mem_nhds _ ε0)] at hst
exact ⟨K, t, hst, hft⟩
/-- If `f` is `C^1` at `x` and `K > ‖fderiv 𝕂 f x‖`, then `f` is `K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of
`x`. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt {f : E' → F'} {x : E'}
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 1 f x) (K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖fderiv 𝕂 f x‖₊ < K) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f t :=
(hf.hasStrictFDerivAt le_rfl).exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt K hK
/-- If `f` is `C^1` at `x`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith {f : E' → F'} {x : E'} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕂 1 f x) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/RCLike.lean | 116 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Cauchy completion
This file generalizes the Cauchy completion of `(ℚ, abs)` to the completion of a ring
with absolute value.
-/
namespace CauSeq.Completion
open CauSeq
section
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
variable {β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- TODO: rename this to `CauSeq.Completion` instead of `CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy`.
/-- The Cauchy completion of a ring with absolute value. -/
def Cauchy :=
@Quotient (CauSeq _ abv) CauSeq.equiv
variable {abv}
/-- The map from Cauchy sequences into the Cauchy completion. -/
def mk : CauSeq _ abv → Cauchy abv :=
Quotient.mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk (f : CauSeq _ abv) : @Eq (Cauchy abv) ⟦f⟧ (mk f) :=
rfl
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq _ abv} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq
/-- The map from the original ring into the Cauchy completion. -/
def ofRat (x : β) : Cauchy abv :=
mk (const abv x)
instance : Zero (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨ofRat 0⟩
instance : One (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨ofRat 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨0⟩
theorem ofRat_zero : (ofRat 0 : Cauchy abv) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem ofRat_one : (ofRat 1 : Cauchy abv) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} : mk f = 0 ↔ LimZero f := by
have : mk f = 0 ↔ LimZero (f - 0) := Quotient.eq
rwa [sub_zero] at this
instance : Add (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map₂ (· + ·)) fun _ _ hf _ _ hg => add_equiv_add hf hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : mk f + mk g = mk (f + g) :=
rfl
instance : Neg (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map Neg.neg) fun _ _ hf => neg_equiv_neg hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : -mk f = mk (-f) :=
rfl
instance : Mul (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map₂ (· * ·)) fun _ _ hf _ _ hg => mul_equiv_mul hf hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : mk f * mk g = mk (f * g) :=
rfl
instance : Sub (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map₂ Sub.sub) fun _ _ hf _ _ hg => sub_equiv_sub hf hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : mk f - mk g = mk (f - g) :=
rfl
instance {γ : Type*} [SMul γ β] [IsScalarTower γ β β] : SMul γ (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun c => (Quotient.map (c • ·)) fun _ _ hf => smul_equiv_smul _ hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_smul {γ : Type*} [SMul γ β] [IsScalarTower γ β β] (c : γ) (f : CauSeq β abv) :
c • mk f = mk (c • f) :=
rfl
instance : Pow (Cauchy abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun x n => Quotient.map (· ^ n) (fun _ _ hf => pow_equiv_pow hf _) x⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_pow (n : ℕ) (f : CauSeq β abv) : mk f ^ n = mk (f ^ n) :=
rfl
instance : NatCast (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun n => mk n⟩
instance : IntCast (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun n => mk n⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_natCast (n : ℕ) : (ofRat n : Cauchy abv) = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_intCast (z : ℤ) : (ofRat z : Cauchy abv) = z :=
rfl
theorem ofRat_add (x y : β) :
ofRat (x + y) = (ofRat x + ofRat y : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_add _ _)
theorem ofRat_neg (x : β) : ofRat (-x) = (-ofRat x : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_neg _)
theorem ofRat_mul (x y : β) :
ofRat (x * y) = (ofRat x * ofRat y : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_mul _ _)
private theorem zero_def : 0 = mk (abv := abv) 0 :=
rfl
private theorem one_def : 1 = mk (abv := abv) 1 :=
rfl
instance Cauchy.ring : Ring (Cauchy abv) := fast_instance%
Function.Surjective.ring mk Quotient.mk'_surjective zero_def.symm one_def.symm
(fun _ _ => (mk_add _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_mul _ _).symm) (fun _ => (mk_neg _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_sub _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_pow _ _).symm) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
/-- `CauSeq.Completion.ofRat` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def ofRatRingHom : β →+* (Cauchy abv) where
toFun := ofRat
map_zero' := ofRat_zero
map_one' := ofRat_one
map_add' := ofRat_add
map_mul' := ofRat_mul
theorem ofRat_sub (x y : β) : ofRat (x - y) = (ofRat x - ofRat y : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_sub _ _)
end
section
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
variable {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
instance Cauchy.commRing : CommRing (Cauchy abv) := fast_instance%
Function.Surjective.commRing mk Quotient.mk'_surjective zero_def.symm one_def.symm
(fun _ _ => (mk_add _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_mul _ _).symm) (fun _ => (mk_neg _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_sub _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_pow _ _).symm) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
end
section
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
variable {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast (Cauchy abv) where nnratCast q := ofRat q
instance instRatCast : RatCast (Cauchy abv) where ratCast q := ofRat q
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofRat_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ofRat (q : β) = (q : Cauchy abv) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofRat_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ofRat (q : β) = (q : Cauchy abv) := rfl
open Classical in
noncomputable instance : Inv (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun x =>
(Quotient.liftOn x fun f => mk <| if h : LimZero f then 0 else inv f h) fun f g fg => by
have := limZero_congr fg
by_cases hf : LimZero f
· simp [hf, this.1 hf, Setoid.refl]
· have hg := mt this.2 hf
simp only [hf, dite_false, hg]
have If : mk (inv f hf) * mk f = 1 := mk_eq.2 (inv_mul_cancel hf)
have Ig : mk (inv g hg) * mk g = 1 := mk_eq.2 (inv_mul_cancel hg)
have Ig' : mk g * mk (inv g hg) = 1 := mk_eq.2 (mul_inv_cancel hg)
rw [mk_eq.2 fg, ← Ig] at If
rw [← mul_one (mk (inv f hf)), ← Ig', ← mul_assoc, If, mul_assoc, Ig', mul_one]⟩
theorem inv_zero : (0 : (Cauchy abv))⁻¹ = 0 :=
congr_arg mk <| by rw [dif_pos] <;> [rfl; exact zero_limZero]
@[simp]
theorem inv_mk {f} (hf) : (mk (abv := abv) f)⁻¹ = mk (inv f hf) :=
congr_arg mk <| by rw [dif_neg]
theorem cau_seq_zero_ne_one : ¬(0 : CauSeq _ abv) ≈ 1 := fun h =>
have : LimZero (1 - 0 : CauSeq _ abv) := Setoid.symm h
have : LimZero (1 : CauSeq _ abv) := by simpa
by apply one_ne_zero <| const_limZero.1 this
theorem zero_ne_one : (0 : (Cauchy abv)) ≠ 1 := fun h => cau_seq_zero_ne_one <| mk_eq.1 h
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel {x : (Cauchy abv)} : x ≠ 0 → x⁻¹ * x = 1 :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun f hf => by
simp only [mk_eq_mk, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero] at hf
simp only [mk_eq_mk, hf, not_false_eq_true, inv_mk, mk_mul]
exact Quotient.sound (CauSeq.inv_mul_cancel hf)
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel {x : (Cauchy abv)} : x ≠ 0 → x * x⁻¹ = 1 :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun f hf => by
simp only [mk_eq_mk, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero] at hf
simp only [mk_eq_mk, hf, not_false_eq_true, inv_mk, mk_mul]
exact Quotient.sound (CauSeq.mul_inv_cancel hf)
theorem ofRat_inv (x : β) : ofRat x⁻¹ = ((ofRat x)⁻¹ : (Cauchy abv)) :=
congr_arg mk <| by split_ifs with h <;>
[simp only [const_limZero.1 h, GroupWithZero.inv_zero, const_zero]; rfl]
noncomputable instance instDivInvMonoid : DivInvMonoid (Cauchy abv) where
lemma ofRat_div (x y : β) : ofRat (x / y) = (ofRat x / ofRat y : Cauchy abv) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ofRat_inv, ofRat_mul]
/-- The Cauchy completion forms a division ring. -/
noncomputable instance Cauchy.divisionRing : DivisionRing (Cauchy abv) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, zero_ne_one⟩
inv_zero := inv_zero
mul_inv_cancel _ := CauSeq.Completion.mul_inv_cancel
nnqsmul := (· • ·)
qsmul := (· • ·)
nnratCast_def q := by simp_rw [← ofRat_nnratCast, NNRat.cast_def, ofRat_div, ofRat_natCast]
ratCast_def q := by rw [← ofRat_ratCast, Rat.cast_def, ofRat_div, ofRat_natCast, ofRat_intCast]
nnqsmul_def _ x := Quotient.inductionOn x fun _ ↦ congr_arg mk <| ext fun _ ↦ NNRat.smul_def _ _
qsmul_def _ x := Quotient.inductionOn x fun _ ↦ congr_arg mk <| ext fun _ ↦ Rat.smul_def _ _
/-- Show the first 10 items of a representative of this equivalence class of cauchy sequences.
The representative chosen is the one passed in the VM to `Quot.mk`, so two cauchy sequences
converging to the same number may be printed differently.
-/
unsafe instance [Repr β] : Repr (Cauchy abv) where
reprPrec r _ :=
let N := 10
let seq := r.unquot
"(sorry /- " ++ Std.Format.joinSep ((List.range N).map <| repr ∘ seq) ", " ++ ", ... -/)"
end
section
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
variable {β : Type*} [Field β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
/-- The Cauchy completion forms a field. -/
noncomputable instance Cauchy.field : Field (Cauchy abv) :=
{ Cauchy.divisionRing, Cauchy.commRing with }
end
end CauSeq.Completion
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
namespace CauSeq
section
variable (β : Type*) [Ring β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
/-- A class stating that a ring with an absolute value is complete, i.e. every Cauchy
sequence has a limit. -/
class IsComplete : Prop where
/-- Every Cauchy sequence has a limit. -/
isComplete : ∀ s : CauSeq β abv, ∃ b : β, s ≈ const abv b
end
section
variable {β : Type*} [Ring β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
variable [IsComplete β abv]
theorem complete : ∀ s : CauSeq β abv, ∃ b : β, s ≈ const abv b :=
IsComplete.isComplete
/-- The limit of a Cauchy sequence in a complete ring. Chosen non-computably. -/
noncomputable def lim (s : CauSeq β abv) : β :=
Classical.choose (complete s)
theorem equiv_lim (s : CauSeq β abv) : s ≈ const abv (lim s) :=
Classical.choose_spec (complete s)
theorem eq_lim_of_const_equiv {f : CauSeq β abv} {x : β} (h : CauSeq.const abv x ≈ f) : x = lim f :=
const_equiv.mp <| Setoid.trans h <| equiv_lim f
theorem lim_eq_of_equiv_const {f : CauSeq β abv} {x : β} (h : f ≈ CauSeq.const abv x) : lim f = x :=
(eq_lim_of_const_equiv <| Setoid.symm h).symm
theorem lim_eq_lim_of_equiv {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : lim f = lim g :=
lim_eq_of_equiv_const <| Setoid.trans h <| equiv_lim g
@[simp]
theorem lim_const (x : β) : lim (const abv x) = x :=
lim_eq_of_equiv_const <| Setoid.refl _
theorem lim_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : lim f + lim g = lim (f + g) :=
eq_lim_of_const_equiv <|
show LimZero (const abv (lim f + lim g) - (f + g)) by
rw [const_add, add_sub_add_comm]
exact add_limZero (Setoid.symm (equiv_lim f)) (Setoid.symm (equiv_lim g))
theorem lim_mul_lim (f g : CauSeq β abv) : lim f * lim g = lim (f * g) :=
eq_lim_of_const_equiv <|
show LimZero (const abv (lim f * lim g) - f * g) by
have h :
const abv (lim f * lim g) - f * g =
(const abv (lim f) - f) * g + const abv (lim f) * (const abv (lim g) - g) := by
apply Subtype.ext
rw [coe_add]
simp [sub_mul, mul_sub]
rw [h]
exact
add_limZero (mul_limZero_left _ (Setoid.symm (equiv_lim _)))
(mul_limZero_right _ (Setoid.symm (equiv_lim _)))
theorem lim_mul (f : CauSeq β abv) (x : β) : lim f * x = lim (f * const abv x) := by
rw [← lim_mul_lim, lim_const]
theorem lim_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : lim (-f) = -lim f :=
lim_eq_of_equiv_const
(show LimZero (-f - const abv (-lim f)) by
rw [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact Setoid.symm (equiv_lim f))
theorem lim_eq_zero_iff (f : CauSeq β abv) : lim f = 0 ↔ LimZero f :=
⟨fun h => by
have hf := equiv_lim f
rw [h] at hf
exact (limZero_congr hf).mpr (const_limZero.mpr rfl),
fun h => by
have h₁ : f = f - const abv 0 := ext fun n => by simp [sub_apply, const_apply]
rw [h₁] at h
exact lim_eq_of_equiv_const h⟩
end
section
variable {β : Type*} [Field β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] [IsComplete β abv]
theorem lim_inv {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) : lim (inv f hf) = (lim f)⁻¹ :=
have hl : lim f ≠ 0 := by rwa [← lim_eq_zero_iff] at hf
lim_eq_of_equiv_const <|
show LimZero (inv f hf - const abv (lim f)⁻¹) from
have h₁ : ∀ (g f : CauSeq β abv) (hf : ¬LimZero f), LimZero (g - f * inv f hf * g) :=
fun g f hf => by
have h₂ : g - f * inv f hf * g = 1 * g - f * inv f hf * g := by rw [one_mul g]
have h₃ : f * inv f hf * g = (f * inv f hf) * g := by simp [mul_assoc]
have h₄ : g - f * inv f hf * g = (1 - f * inv f hf) * g := by rw [h₂, h₃, ← sub_mul]
have h₅ : g - f * inv f hf * g = g * (1 - f * inv f hf) := by rw [h₄, mul_comm]
have h₆ : g - f * inv f hf * g = g * (1 - inv f hf * f) := by rw [h₅, mul_comm f]
rw [h₆]; exact mul_limZero_right _ (Setoid.symm (CauSeq.inv_mul_cancel _))
have h₂ :
LimZero
(inv f hf - const abv (lim f)⁻¹ -
(const abv (lim f) - f) * (inv f hf * const abv (lim f)⁻¹)) := by
rw [sub_mul, ← sub_add, sub_sub, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_right_comm, sub_add]
show LimZero
(inv f hf - const abv (lim f) * (inv f hf * const abv (lim f)⁻¹) -
(const abv (lim f)⁻¹ - f * (inv f hf * const abv (lim f)⁻¹)))
exact sub_limZero
(by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm, const_inv hl]; exact h₁ _ _ _)
| (by rw [← mul_assoc]; exact h₁ _ _ _)
(limZero_congr h₂).mpr <| mul_limZero_left _ (Setoid.symm (equiv_lim f))
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Completion.lean | 386 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
| -/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 207 | 211 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Sheaf.ChangeOfRings
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LocallySurjective
/-!
# The associated sheaf of a presheaf of modules
In this file, given a presheaf of modules `M₀` over a presheaf of rings `R₀`,
we construct the associated sheaf of `M₀`. More precisely, if `R` is a sheaf of
rings and `α : R₀ ⟶ R.val` is locally bijective, and `A` is the sheafification
of the underlying presheaf of abelian groups of `M₀`, i.e. we have a locally bijective
map `φ : M₀.presheaf ⟶ A.val`, then we endow `A` with the structure of a
sheaf of modules over `R`: this is `PresheafOfModules.sheafify α φ`.
In many applications, the morphism `α` shall be the identity, but this more
general construction allows the sheafification of both the presheaf of rings
and the presheaf of modules.
-/
universe w v v₁ u₁ u
open CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {J : GrothendieckTopology C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Presieve.FamilyOfElements
section smul
variable {R : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ RingCat.{u}} {M : PresheafOfModules.{v} R} {X : C} {P : Presieve X}
(r : FamilyOfElements (R ⋙ forget _) P) (m : FamilyOfElements (M.presheaf ⋙ forget _) P)
/-- The scalar multiplication of family of elements of a presheaf of modules `M` over `R`
by a family of elements of `R`. -/
def smul : FamilyOfElements (M.presheaf ⋙ forget _) P := fun Y f hf =>
HSMul.hSMul (α := R.obj (Opposite.op Y)) (β := M.obj (Opposite.op Y)) (r f hf) (m f hf)
end smul
section
variable {R₀ R : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ RingCat.{u}} (α : R₀ ⟶ R) [Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J α]
{M₀ : PresheafOfModules.{v} R₀} {A : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrp.{v}} (φ : M₀.presheaf ⟶ A)
[Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J φ] (hA : Presheaf.IsSeparated J A)
{X : C} (r : R.obj (Opposite.op X)) (m : A.obj (Opposite.op X)) {P : Presieve X}
(r₀ : FamilyOfElements (R₀ ⋙ forget _) P) (m₀ : FamilyOfElements (M₀.presheaf ⋙ forget _) P)
include hA
lemma _root_.PresheafOfModules.Sheafify.app_eq_of_isLocallyInjective
{Y : C} (r₀ r₀' : R₀.obj (Opposite.op Y))
(m₀ m₀' : M₀.obj (Opposite.op Y))
(hr₀ : α.app _ r₀ = α.app _ r₀')
(hm₀ : φ.app _ m₀ = φ.app _ m₀') :
φ.app _ (r₀ • m₀) = φ.app _ (r₀' • m₀') := by
apply hA _ (Presheaf.equalizerSieve r₀ r₀' ⊓
Presheaf.equalizerSieve (F := M₀.presheaf) m₀ m₀')
· apply J.intersection_covering
· exact Presheaf.equalizerSieve_mem J α _ _ hr₀
· exact Presheaf.equalizerSieve_mem J φ _ _ hm₀
· intro Z g hg
rw [← NatTrans.naturality_apply (D := Ab), ← NatTrans.naturality_apply (D := Ab)]
erw [M₀.map_smul, M₀.map_smul, hg.1, hg.2]
rfl
lemma isCompatible_map_smul_aux {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
(r₀ : R₀.obj (Opposite.op Y)) (r₀' : R₀.obj (Opposite.op Z))
(m₀ : M₀.obj (Opposite.op Y)) (m₀' : M₀.obj (Opposite.op Z))
(hr₀ : α.app _ r₀ = R.map f.op r) (hr₀' : α.app _ r₀' = R.map (f.op ≫ g.op) r)
(hm₀ : φ.app _ m₀ = A.map f.op m) (hm₀' : φ.app _ m₀' = A.map (f.op ≫ g.op) m) :
φ.app _ (M₀.map g.op (r₀ • m₀)) = φ.app _ (r₀' • m₀') := by
rw [← PresheafOfModules.Sheafify.app_eq_of_isLocallyInjective α φ hA (R₀.map g.op r₀) r₀'
(M₀.map g.op m₀) m₀', M₀.map_smul]
· rw [hr₀', R.map_comp, RingCat.comp_apply, ← hr₀, ← RingCat.comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality,
RingCat.comp_apply]
· rw [hm₀', A.map_comp, AddCommGrp.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ← hm₀]
erw [NatTrans.naturality_apply φ]
variable (hr₀ : (r₀.map (whiskerRight α (forget _))).IsAmalgamation r)
(hm₀ : (m₀.map (whiskerRight φ (forget _))).IsAmalgamation m)
include hr₀ hm₀ in
lemma isCompatible_map_smul : ((r₀.smul m₀).map (whiskerRight φ (forget _))).Compatible := by
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ fac
let a₁ := r₀ f₁ h₁
let b₁ := m₀ f₁ h₁
let a₂ := r₀ f₂ h₂
let b₂ := m₀ f₂ h₂
let a₀ := R₀.map g₁.op a₁
let b₀ := M₀.map g₁.op b₁
have ha₁ : (α.app (Opposite.op Y₁)) a₁ = (R.map f₁.op) r := (hr₀ f₁ h₁).symm
have ha₂ : (α.app (Opposite.op Y₂)) a₂ = (R.map f₂.op) r := (hr₀ f₂ h₂).symm
have hb₁ : (φ.app (Opposite.op Y₁)) b₁ = (A.map f₁.op) m := (hm₀ f₁ h₁).symm
have hb₂ : (φ.app (Opposite.op Y₂)) b₂ = (A.map f₂.op) m := (hm₀ f₂ h₂).symm
have ha₀ : (α.app (Opposite.op Z)) a₀ = (R.map (f₁.op ≫ g₁.op)) r := by
dsimp [a₀]
rw [← RingCat.comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality, RingCat.comp_apply, ha₁, Functor.map_comp,
RingCat.comp_apply]
have hb₀ : (φ.app (Opposite.op Z)) b₀ = (A.map (f₁.op ≫ g₁.op)) m := by
dsimp [b₀]
erw [NatTrans.naturality_apply φ, hb₁, Functor.map_comp, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
have ha₀' : (α.app (Opposite.op Z)) a₀ = (R.map (f₂.op ≫ g₂.op)) r := by
rw [ha₀, ← op_comp, fac, op_comp]
have hb₀' : (φ.app (Opposite.op Z)) b₀ = (A.map (f₂.op ≫ g₂.op)) m := by
rw [hb₀, ← op_comp, fac, op_comp]
dsimp
erw [← NatTrans.naturality_apply φ, ← NatTrans.naturality_apply φ]
exact (isCompatible_map_smul_aux α φ hA r m f₁ g₁ a₁ a₀ b₁ b₀ ha₁ ha₀ hb₁ hb₀).trans
(isCompatible_map_smul_aux α φ hA r m f₂ g₂ a₂ a₀ b₂ b₀ ha₂ ha₀' hb₂ hb₀').symm
end
end Presieve.FamilyOfElements
end CategoryTheory
variable {R₀ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ RingCat.{u}} {R : Sheaf J RingCat.{u}} (α : R₀ ⟶ R.val)
[Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J α] [Presheaf.IsLocallySurjective J α]
namespace PresheafOfModules
variable {M₀ : PresheafOfModules.{v} R₀} {A : Sheaf J AddCommGrp.{v}}
(φ : M₀.presheaf ⟶ A.val)
[Presheaf.IsLocallyInjective J φ] [Presheaf.IsLocallySurjective J φ]
namespace Sheafify
variable {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (π : X ⟶ Y) (r r' : R.val.obj X) (m m' : A.val.obj X)
/-- Assuming `α : R₀ ⟶ R.val` is the sheafification map of a presheaf of rings `R₀`
and `φ : M₀.presheaf ⟶ A.val` is the sheafification map of the underlying
sheaf of abelian groups of a presheaf of modules `M₀` over `R₀`, then given
`r : R.val.obj X` and `m : A.val.obj X`, this structure contains the data
of `x : A.val.obj X` along with the property which makes `x` a good candidate
for the definition of the scalar multiplication `r • m`. -/
structure SMulCandidate where
/-- The candidate for the scalar product `r • m`. -/
x : A.val.obj X
h ⦃Y : Cᵒᵖ⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (r₀ : R₀.obj Y) (hr₀ : α.app Y r₀ = R.val.map f r)
(m₀ : M₀.obj Y) (hm₀ : φ.app Y m₀ = A.val.map f m) : A.val.map f x = φ.app Y (r₀ • m₀)
/-- Constructor for `SMulCandidate`. -/
def SMulCandidate.mk' (S : Sieve X.unop) (hS : S ∈ J X.unop)
(r₀ : Presieve.FamilyOfElements (R₀ ⋙ forget _) S.arrows)
(m₀ : Presieve.FamilyOfElements (M₀.presheaf ⋙ forget _) S.arrows)
(hr₀ : (r₀.map (whiskerRight α (forget _))).IsAmalgamation r)
(hm₀ : (m₀.map (whiskerRight φ (forget _))).IsAmalgamation m)
(a : A.val.obj X)
(ha : ((r₀.smul m₀).map (whiskerRight φ (forget _))).IsAmalgamation a) :
SMulCandidate α φ r m where
x := a
h Y f a₀ ha₀ b₀ hb₀ := by
apply A.isSeparated _ _ (J.pullback_stable f.unop hS)
rintro Z g hg
dsimp at hg
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← A.val.map_comp, ← NatTrans.naturality_apply (D := Ab)]
erw [M₀.map_smul] -- Mismatch between `M₀.map` and `M₀.presheaf.map`
refine (ha _ hg).trans (app_eq_of_isLocallyInjective α φ A.isSeparated _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_)
· rw [← RingCat.comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality, RingCat.comp_apply, ha₀]
apply (hr₀ _ hg).symm.trans
simp
· erw [NatTrans.naturality_apply φ, hb₀]
apply (hm₀ _ hg).symm.trans
dsimp
rw [Functor.map_comp]
rfl
instance : Nonempty (SMulCandidate α φ r m) := ⟨by
let S := (Presheaf.imageSieve α r ⊓ Presheaf.imageSieve φ m)
have hS : S ∈ J _ := by
apply J.intersection_covering
all_goals apply Presheaf.imageSieve_mem
have h₁ : S ≤ Presheaf.imageSieve α r := fun _ _ h => h.1
have h₂ : S ≤ Presheaf.imageSieve φ m := fun _ _ h => h.2
let r₀ := (Presieve.FamilyOfElements.localPreimage (whiskerRight α (forget _)) r).restrict h₁
let m₀ := (Presieve.FamilyOfElements.localPreimage (whiskerRight φ (forget _)) m).restrict h₂
have hr₀ : (r₀.map (whiskerRight α (forget _))).IsAmalgamation r := by
rw [Presieve.FamilyOfElements.restrict_map]
apply Presieve.isAmalgamation_restrict
apply Presieve.FamilyOfElements.isAmalgamation_map_localPreimage
have hm₀ : (m₀.map (whiskerRight φ (forget _))).IsAmalgamation m := by
rw [Presieve.FamilyOfElements.restrict_map]
apply Presieve.isAmalgamation_restrict
apply Presieve.FamilyOfElements.isAmalgamation_map_localPreimage
exact SMulCandidate.mk' α φ r m S hS r₀ m₀ hr₀ hm₀ _ (Presieve.IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation
(((sheafCompose J (forget _)).obj A).2.isSheafFor S hS)
(Presieve.FamilyOfElements.isCompatible_map_smul α φ A.isSeparated r m r₀ m₀ hr₀ hm₀))⟩
instance : Subsingleton (SMulCandidate α φ r m) where
allEq := by
rintro ⟨x₁, h₁⟩ ⟨x₂, h₂⟩
simp only [SMulCandidate.mk.injEq]
let S := (Presheaf.imageSieve α r ⊓ Presheaf.imageSieve φ m)
have hS : S ∈ J _ := by
apply J.intersection_covering
all_goals apply Presheaf.imageSieve_mem
apply A.isSeparated _ _ hS
intro Y f ⟨⟨r₀, hr₀⟩, ⟨m₀, hm₀⟩⟩
rw [h₁ f.op r₀ hr₀ m₀ hm₀, h₂ f.op r₀ hr₀ m₀ hm₀]
noncomputable instance : Unique (SMulCandidate α φ r m) :=
uniqueOfSubsingleton (Nonempty.some inferInstance)
/-- The (unique) element in `SMulCandidate α φ r m`. -/
noncomputable def smulCandidate : SMulCandidate α φ r m := default
/-- The scalar multiplication on the sheafification of a presheaf of modules. -/
noncomputable def smul : A.val.obj X := (smulCandidate α φ r m).x
lemma map_smul_eq {Y : Cᵒᵖ} (f : X ⟶ Y) (r₀ : R₀.obj Y) (hr₀ : α.app Y r₀ = R.val.map f r)
(m₀ : M₀.obj Y) (hm₀ : φ.app Y m₀ = A.val.map f m) :
A.val.map f (smul α φ r m) = φ.app Y (r₀ • m₀) :=
(smulCandidate α φ r m).h f r₀ hr₀ m₀ hm₀
protected lemma one_smul : smul α φ 1 m = m := by
apply A.isSeparated _ _ (Presheaf.imageSieve_mem J φ m)
rintro Y f ⟨m₀, hm₀⟩
rw [← hm₀, map_smul_eq α φ 1 m f.op 1 (by simp) m₀ hm₀, one_smul]
protected lemma zero_smul : smul α φ 0 m = 0 := by
apply A.isSeparated _ _ (Presheaf.imageSieve_mem J φ m)
rintro Y f ⟨m₀, hm₀⟩
rw [map_smul_eq α φ 0 m f.op 0 (by simp) m₀ hm₀, zero_smul, map_zero,
(A.val.map f.op).hom.map_zero]
protected lemma smul_zero : smul α φ r 0 = 0 := by
apply A.isSeparated _ _ (Presheaf.imageSieve_mem J α r)
rintro Y f ⟨r₀, hr₀⟩
rw [(A.val.map f.op).hom.map_zero, map_smul_eq α φ r 0 f.op r₀ hr₀ 0 (by simp),
smul_zero, map_zero]
protected lemma smul_add : smul α φ r (m + m') = smul α φ r m + smul α φ r m' := by
let S := Presheaf.imageSieve α r ⊓ Presheaf.imageSieve φ m ⊓ Presheaf.imageSieve φ m'
have hS : S ∈ J X.unop := by
refine J.intersection_covering (J.intersection_covering ?_ ?_) ?_
all_goals apply Presheaf.imageSieve_mem
apply A.isSeparated _ _ hS
rintro Y f ⟨⟨⟨r₀, hr₀⟩, ⟨m₀ : M₀.obj _, hm₀ : (φ.app _) _ = _⟩⟩,
⟨m₀' : M₀.obj _, hm₀' : (φ.app _) _ = _⟩⟩
rw [(A.val.map f.op).hom.map_add, map_smul_eq α φ r m f.op r₀ hr₀ m₀ hm₀,
map_smul_eq α φ r m' f.op r₀ hr₀ m₀' hm₀',
map_smul_eq α φ r (m + m') f.op r₀ hr₀ (m₀ + m₀')
(by rw [map_add, map_add, hm₀, hm₀']),
smul_add, map_add]
|
protected lemma add_smul : smul α φ (r + r') m = smul α φ r m + smul α φ r' m := by
let S := Presheaf.imageSieve α r ⊓ Presheaf.imageSieve α r' ⊓ Presheaf.imageSieve φ m
have hS : S ∈ J X.unop := by
refine J.intersection_covering (J.intersection_covering ?_ ?_) ?_
all_goals apply Presheaf.imageSieve_mem
apply A.isSeparated _ _ hS
rintro Y f ⟨⟨⟨r₀ : R₀.obj _, (hr₀ : (α.app (Opposite.op Y)) r₀ = (R.val.map f.op) r)⟩,
⟨r₀' : R₀.obj _, (hr₀' : (α.app (Opposite.op Y)) r₀' = (R.val.map f.op) r')⟩⟩, ⟨m₀, hm₀⟩⟩
rw [(A.val.map f.op).hom.map_add, map_smul_eq α φ r m f.op r₀ hr₀ m₀ hm₀,
map_smul_eq α φ r' m f.op r₀' hr₀' m₀ hm₀,
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/ModuleCat/Presheaf/Sheafify.lean | 251 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
|
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 200 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov,
Neil Strickland, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
/-!
# Divisibility and units
## Main definition
* `IsRelPrime x y`: that `x` and `y` are relatively prime, defined to mean that the only common
divisors of `x` and `y` are the units.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Units
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b : α} {u : αˣ}
/-- Elements of the unit group of a monoid represented as elements of the monoid
divide any element of the monoid. -/
theorem coe_dvd : ↑u ∣ a :=
⟨↑u⁻¹ * a, by simp⟩
/-- In a monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all
associates of `b`. -/
theorem dvd_mul_right : a ∣ b * u ↔ a ∣ b :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨c, eq⟩ ↦ ⟨c * ↑u⁻¹, by rw [← mul_assoc, ← eq, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩)
fun ⟨_, eq⟩ ↦ eq.symm ▸ (_root_.dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_right _
/-- In a monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
theorem mul_right_dvd : a * u ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨c, eq⟩ => ⟨↑u * c, eq.trans (mul_assoc _ _ _)⟩) fun h =>
dvd_trans (Dvd.intro (↑u⁻¹) (by rw [mul_assoc, u.mul_inv, mul_one])) h
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {u : αˣ}
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all left
associates of `b`. -/
theorem dvd_mul_left : a ∣ u * b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply dvd_mul_right
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all
left associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
theorem mul_left_dvd : ↑u * a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply mul_right_dvd
end CommMonoid
end Units
namespace IsUnit
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b u : α}
/-- Units of a monoid divide any element of the monoid. -/
@[simp]
theorem dvd (hu : IsUnit u) : u ∣ a := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.coe_dvd
@[simp]
theorem dvd_mul_right (hu : IsUnit u) : a ∣ b * u ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.dvd_mul_right
/-- In a monoid, an element a divides an element b iff all associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_dvd (hu : IsUnit u) : a * u ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.mul_right_dvd
theorem isPrimal (hu : IsUnit u) : IsPrimal u :=
fun _ _ _ ↦ ⟨u, 1, hu.dvd, one_dvd _, (mul_one u).symm⟩
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a b u : α}
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all left
associates of `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem dvd_mul_left (hu : IsUnit u) : a ∣ u * b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.dvd_mul_left
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all
left associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_dvd (hu : IsUnit u) : u * a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.mul_left_dvd
end CommMonoid
end IsUnit
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
theorem isUnit_iff_dvd_one {x : α} : IsUnit x ↔ x ∣ 1 :=
⟨IsUnit.dvd, fun ⟨y, h⟩ => ⟨⟨x, y, h.symm, by rw [h, mul_comm]⟩, rfl⟩⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_forall_dvd {x : α} : IsUnit x ↔ ∀ y, x ∣ y :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.trans ⟨fun h _ => h.trans (one_dvd _), fun h => h _⟩
theorem isUnit_of_dvd_unit {x y : α} (xy : x ∣ y) (hu : IsUnit y) : IsUnit x :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <| xy.trans <| isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 hu
theorem isUnit_of_dvd_one {a : α} (h : a ∣ 1) : IsUnit (a : α) :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.mpr h
|
theorem not_isUnit_of_not_isUnit_dvd {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) (hb : a ∣ b) : ¬IsUnit b :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Divisibility/Units.lean | 131 | 132 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.