Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
/-!
# Monotone functions on an order topology
This file contains lemmas about limits and continuity for monotone / antitone functions on
linearly-ordered sets (with the order topology). For example, we prove that a monotone function
has left and right limits at any point (`Monotone.tendsto_nhdsLT`, `Monotone.tendsto_nhdsGT`).
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β]
/-- A monotone function continuous at the supremum of a nonempty set sends this supremum to
the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csSup_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f A (sSup A))
(Mf : MonotoneOn f A) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddAbove A := by bddDefault) :
f (sSup A) = sSup (f '' A) :=
--This is a particular case of the more general `IsLUB.isLUB_of_tendsto`
.symm <| ((isLUB_csSup A_nonemp A_bdd).isLUB_of_tendsto Mf A_nonemp <|
Cf.mono_left fun ⦃_⦄ a ↦ a).csSup_eq (A_nonemp.image f)
/-- A monotone function continuous at the supremum of a nonempty set sends this supremum to
the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Monotone.map_csSup_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (sSup A)) (Mf : Monotone f) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty)
(A_bdd : BddAbove A := by bddDefault) : f (sSup A) = sSup (f '' A) :=
MonotoneOn.map_csSup_of_continuousWithinAt Cf.continuousWithinAt
(Mf.monotoneOn _) A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- A monotone function continuous at the indexed supremum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
theorem Monotone.map_ciSup_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iSup g)) (Mf : Monotone f)
(bdd : BddAbove (range g) := by bddDefault) : f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) := by
rw [iSup, Monotone.map_csSup_of_continuousAt Cf Mf (range_nonempty g) bdd, ← range_comp, iSup,
comp_def]
/-- A monotone function continuous at the infimum of a nonempty set sends this infimum to
the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csInf_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f A (sInf A))
(Mf : MonotoneOn f A) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddBelow A := by bddDefault) :
f (sInf A) = sInf (f '' A) :=
MonotoneOn.map_csSup_of_continuousWithinAt (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Mf.dual A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- A monotone function continuous at the infimum of a nonempty set sends this infimum to
the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Monotone.map_csInf_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sInf A))
(Mf : Monotone f) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddBelow A := by bddDefault) :
f (sInf A) = sInf (f '' A) :=
Monotone.map_csSup_of_continuousAt (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Mf.dual A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- A monotone function continuous at the indexed infimum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
infimum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
theorem Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iInf g)) (Mf : Monotone f)
(bdd : BddBelow (range g) := by bddDefault) : f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) := by
rw [iInf, Monotone.map_csInf_of_continuousAt Cf Mf (range_nonempty g) bdd, ← range_comp, iInf,
comp_def]
/-- An antitone function continuous at the infimum of a nonempty set sends this infimum to
the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.map_csInf_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f A (sInf A))
(Af : AntitoneOn f A) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddBelow A := by bddDefault) :
f (sInf A) = sSup (f '' A) :=
MonotoneOn.map_csInf_of_continuousWithinAt (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Af.dual_right A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- An antitone function continuous at the infimum of a nonempty set sends this infimum to
the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Antitone.map_csInf_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sInf A))
(Af : Antitone f) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddBelow A := by bddDefault) :
f (sInf A) = sSup (f '' A) :=
Monotone.map_csInf_of_continuousAt (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Af.dual_right A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- An antitone function continuous at the indexed infimum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
infimum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
theorem Antitone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iInf g)) (Af : Antitone f)
(bdd : BddBelow (range g) := by bddDefault) : f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) := by
rw [iInf, Antitone.map_csInf_of_continuousAt Cf Af (range_nonempty g) bdd, ← range_comp, iSup,
comp_def]
/-- An antitone function continuous at the supremum of a nonempty set sends this supremum to
the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.map_csSup_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f A (sSup A))
(Af : AntitoneOn f A) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddAbove A := by bddDefault) :
f (sSup A) = sInf (f '' A) :=
MonotoneOn.map_csSup_of_continuousWithinAt (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Af.dual_right A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- An antitone function continuous at the supremum of a nonempty set sends this supremum to
the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Antitone.map_csSup_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {A : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sSup A))
(Af : Antitone f) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddAbove A := by bddDefault) :
f (sSup A) = sInf (f '' A) :=
Monotone.map_csSup_of_continuousAt (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Af.dual_right A_nonemp A_bdd
/-- An antitone function continuous at the indexed supremum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this
indexed supremum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
theorem Antitone.map_ciSup_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iSup g)) (Af : Antitone f)
(bdd : BddAbove (range g) := by bddDefault) : f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) := by
rw [iSup, Antitone.map_csSup_of_continuousAt Cf Af (range_nonempty g) bdd, ← range_comp, iInf,
comp_def]
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
section CompleteLinearOrder
variable [CompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] [CompleteLinearOrder β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β]
theorem sSup_mem_closure {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s ∈ closure s :=
(isLUB_sSup s).mem_closure hs
theorem sInf_mem_closure {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ closure s :=
(isGLB_sInf s).mem_closure hs
theorem IsClosed.sSup_mem {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hc : IsClosed s) : sSup s ∈ s :=
(isLUB_sSup s).mem_of_isClosed hs hc
theorem IsClosed.sInf_mem {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hc : IsClosed s) : sInf s ∈ s :=
(isGLB_sInf s).mem_of_isClosed hs hc
/-- A monotone function `f` sending `bot` to `bot` and continuous at the supremum of a set sends
this supremum to the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.map_sSup_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f s (sSup s))
(Mf : MonotoneOn f s) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) : f (sSup s) = sSup (f '' s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, fbot]
· exact Mf.map_csSup_of_continuousWithinAt Cf h
/-- A monotone function `f` sending `bot` to `bot` and continuous at the supremum of a set sends
this supremum to the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Monotone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sSup s))
(Mf : Monotone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) : f (sSup s) = sSup (f '' s) :=
MonotoneOn.map_sSup_of_continuousWithinAt Cf.continuousWithinAt (Mf.monotoneOn _) fbot
/-- If a monotone function sending `bot` to `bot` is continuous at the indexed supremum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
theorem Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iSup g)) (Mf : Monotone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) := by
rw [iSup, Mf.map_sSup_of_continuousAt Cf fbot, ← range_comp, iSup, comp_def]
/-- A monotone function `f` sending `top` to `top` and continuous at the infimum of a set sends
this infimum to the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.map_sInf_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f s (sInf s)) (Mf : MonotoneOn f s) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) :
f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
MonotoneOn.map_sSup_of_continuousWithinAt (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Mf.dual ftop
/-- A monotone function `f` sending `top` to `top` and continuous at the infimum of a set sends
this infimum to the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Monotone.map_sInf_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sInf s))
(Mf : Monotone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
Monotone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Mf.dual ftop
/-- If a monotone function sending `top` to `top` is continuous at the indexed infimum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed infimum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
theorem Monotone.map_iInf_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iInf g)) (Mf : Monotone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) : f (iInf g) = iInf (f ∘ g) :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) Cf Mf.dual ftop
/-- An antitone function `f` sending `bot` to `top` and continuous at the supremum of a set sends
this supremum to the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.map_sSup_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f s (sSup s)) (Af : AntitoneOn f s) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊤) :
f (sSup s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
MonotoneOn.map_sSup_of_continuousWithinAt
(show ContinuousWithinAt (OrderDual.toDual ∘ f) s (sSup s) from Cf) Af fbot
/-- An antitone function `f` sending `bot` to `top` and continuous at the supremum of a set sends
this supremum to the infimum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Antitone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sSup s))
(Af : Antitone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊤) : f (sSup s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
Monotone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt (show ContinuousAt (OrderDual.toDual ∘ f) (sSup s) from Cf) Af
fbot
/-- An antitone function sending `bot` to `top` is continuous at the indexed supremum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
theorem Antitone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iSup g)) (Af : Antitone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊤) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt (show ContinuousAt (OrderDual.toDual ∘ f) (iSup g) from Cf) Af
fbot
/-- An antitone function `f` sending `top` to `bot` and continuous at the infimum of a set sends
this infimum to the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.map_sInf_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(Cf : ContinuousWithinAt f s (sInf s)) (Af : AntitoneOn f s) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊥) :
f (sInf s) = sSup (f '' s) :=
MonotoneOn.map_sInf_of_continuousWithinAt
(show ContinuousWithinAt (OrderDual.toDual ∘ f) s (sInf s) from Cf) Af ftop
/-- An antitone function `f` sending `top` to `bot` and continuous at the infimum of a set sends
this infimum to the supremum of the image of this set. -/
theorem Antitone.map_sInf_of_continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sInf s))
(Af : Antitone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊥) : f (sInf s) = sSup (f '' s) :=
Monotone.map_sInf_of_continuousAt (show ContinuousAt (OrderDual.toDual ∘ f) (sInf s) from Cf) Af
ftop
/-- If an antitone function sending `top` to `bot` is continuous at the indexed infimum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed infimum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
theorem Antitone.map_iInf_of_continuousAt {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iInf g)) (Af : Antitone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊥) : f (iInf g) = iSup (f ∘ g) :=
Monotone.map_iInf_of_continuousAt (show ContinuousAt (OrderDual.toDual ∘ f) (iInf g) from Cf) Af
ftop
end CompleteLinearOrder
| section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/Monotone.lean | 230 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Uthaiwat, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Identities
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Nilpotency in polynomial rings.
This file is a place for results related to nilpotency in (single-variable) polynomial rings.
## Main results:
* `Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff`
* `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`
-/
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} {r : R}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {P : R[X]}
lemma isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent ((C r) * X ^ n) := by
refine Commute.isNilpotent_mul_left (commute_X_pow _ _).symm ?_
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hnil
refine ⟨m, ?_⟩
rw [← C_pow, hm, C_0]
lemma isNilpotent_pow_X_mul_C_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent (X ^ n * (C r)) := by
rw [commute_X_pow]
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent n hnil
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_monomial_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsNilpotent (monomial (R := R) n r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simp
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_C_iff :
IsNilpotent (C r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simpa only [← C_pow] using C_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_X_mul_iff :
IsNilpotent (X * P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right_iff (commute_X P) (by simp)] at h
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨k, by simp [(commute_X P).mul_pow, hk]⟩
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_mul_X_iff :
IsNilpotent (P * X) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
rw [← commute_X P]
exact isNilpotent_X_mul_iff
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {P : R[X]}
protected lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent P ↔ ∀ i, IsNilpotent (coeff P i) := by
refine
⟨P.recOnHorner (by simp) (fun p r hp₀ _ hp hpr i ↦ ?_) (fun p _ hnp hpX i ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← sum_monomial_eq P]
exact isNilpotent_sum (fun i _ ↦ by simpa only [isNilpotent_monomial_iff] using h i)
· have hr : IsNilpotent (C r) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hpr
replace hp : eval 0 p = 0 := by rwa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero] at hp₀
refine isNilpotent_C_iff.mpr ⟨k, ?_⟩
simpa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero, hp] using congr_arg (fun q ↦ coeff q 0) hk
rcases i with - | i
· simpa [hp₀] using hr
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_C_succ, add_zero]
apply hp
simpa using Commute.isNilpotent_sub (Commute.all _ _) hpr hr
· rcases i with - | i
· simp
simpa using hnp (isNilpotent_mul_X_iff.mp hpX) i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reflect_iff {P : R[X]} {N : ℕ} (hN : P.natDegree ≤ N) :
IsNilpotent (reflect N P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
simp only [Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff, coeff_reverse]
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ ?_, fun h i ↦ ?_⟩ <;> rcases le_or_lt i N with hi | hi
· simpa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hi] using h (N - i)
· simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt hN hi]
· simpa [hi, revAt_le] using h (N - i)
· simpa [revAt_eq_self_of_lt hi] using h i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reverse_iff :
IsNilpotent P.reverse ↔ IsNilpotent P :=
isNilpotent_reflect_iff (le_refl _)
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If its constant term is a unit and its other coefficients are
nilpotent, then `P` is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
theorem isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent (hunit : IsUnit (P.coeff 0))
(hnil : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) : IsUnit P := by
induction' h : P.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with k hind generalizing P
by_cases hdeg : P.natDegree = 0
{ rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hdeg]
exact hunit.map C }
set P₁ := P.eraseLead with hP₁
suffices IsUnit P₁ by
rw [← eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff P, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← hP₁]
refine IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_left_of_commute ?_ this (Commute.all _ _)
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent _ (hnil _ hdeg)
have hdeg₂ := lt_of_le_of_lt P.eraseLead_natDegree_le (Nat.sub_lt
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hdeg) zero_lt_one)
refine hind P₁.natDegree ?_ ?_ (fun i hi => ?_) rfl
· simp_rw [P₁, ← h, hdeg₂]
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (Ne.symm hdeg), hunit]
· by_cases H : i ≤ P₁.natDegree
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H hdeg₂)), hnil i hi]
· simp_rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge H), IsNilpotent.zero]
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If `P` is a unit, then all its coefficients are nilpotent,
except its constant term which is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
theorem coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent_of_isUnit (hunit : IsUnit P) :
IsUnit (P.coeff 0) ∧ (∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) := by
obtain ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := IsUnit.exists_right_inv hunit
constructor
· refine isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (Q.coeff 0) ?_
have h := (mul_coeff_zero P Q).symm
rwa [hQ, coeff_one_zero] at h
· intros n hn
rw [nilpotent_iff_mem_prime]
intros I hI
let f := mapRingHom (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
have hPQ : degree (f P) = 0 ∧ degree (f Q) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff, ← degree_mul, ← map_mul, hQ, map_one, degree_one]
have hcoeff : (f P).coeff n = 0 := by
refine coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt ?_
rw [hPQ.1]
exact WithBot.coe_pos.2 hn.bot_lt
rw [coe_mapRingHom, coeff_map, ← RingHom.mem_ker, Ideal.mk_ker] at hcoeff
exact hcoeff
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. `P` is a unit if and only if all its coefficients are
nilpotent, except its constant term which is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff'`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent :
IsUnit P ↔ IsUnit (P.coeff 0) ∧ (∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) :=
⟨coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent_of_isUnit, fun H => isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent H.1 H.2⟩
| @[simp] lemma isUnit_C_add_X_mul_iff :
IsUnit (C r + X * P) ↔ IsUnit r ∧ IsNilpotent P := by
have : ∀ i, coeff (C r + X * P) (i + 1) = coeff P i := by simp
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent, Nat.forall_ne_zero_iff, this]
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_C_zero, mul_coeff_zero, coeff_X_zero, zero_mul, add_zero,
and_congr_right_iff, ← Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Nilpotent.lean | 160 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≤ a} = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ico a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioc a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ico a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ioc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Icc a b) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
end PartialOrder
section Prod
variable {β : Type*}
section sectL
lemma uIcc_map_sectL [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = uIcc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectL : (Icc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Icc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectL : (Ioc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectL : (Ico a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ico (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectL : (Ioo a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioo (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectL
section sectR
lemma uIcc_map_sectR [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectR c _) = uIcc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectR : (Icc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Icc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectR : (Ioc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectR : (Ico a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ico (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectR : (Ioo a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioo (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectR
end Prod
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : #(Ioi a) = #(Ici a) - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
|
end OrderTop
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 746 | 747 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
|
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 332 | 333 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.oangle`, with notation `∡`, is the oriented angle determined by three
points.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- A fixed choice of positive orientation of Euclidean space `ℝ²` -/
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- The oriented angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and `p₃`, modulo `2 * π`. If
either of those points equals `p₂`, this is 0. See `EuclideanGeometry.angle` for the
corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when neither end point equals the middle point. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
unfold oangle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
/-- The angle ∡AAB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABA at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the last two points are not equal.
-/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Reversing the order of the points passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
/-- Adding an angle to that with the order of the points reversed results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
/-- An oriented angle is zero if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- An oriented angle is `π` if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
`π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- An oriented angle is not zero or `π` if and only if the three points are affinely
independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3))]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
/-- An oriented angle is zero or `π` if and only if the three points are collinear. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
/-- An oriented angle has a sign zero if and only if the three points are collinear. -/
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
/-- If twice the oriented angles between two triples of points are equal, one triple is affinely
independent if and only if the other is. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
/-- If twice the oriented angles between two triples of points are equal, one triple is collinear
if and only if the other is. -/
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
/-- If corresponding pairs of points in two angles have the same vector span, twice those angles
are equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
/-- If the lines determined by corresponding pairs of points in two angles are parallel, twice
those angles are equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the second at `p` plus
the angle between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the second and the third at `p` plus
the angle between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the third at `p` minus
the angle between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the third at `p` minus
the angle between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, adding the angles between them at `p` in cyclic order
results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
angle-at-point form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle is acute, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle is acute, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` equals that of the
unoriented angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The oriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is plus or minus the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The unoriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is the absolute value of the
oriented angle. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle at `p` between two points is zero, either one of the points
equals `p` or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
/-- If the signs of two nondegenerate oriented angles between points are equal, the oriented
angles are equal if and only if the unoriented angles are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
/-- The oriented angle between three points equals the unoriented angle if the sign is
positive. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
/-- The oriented angle between three points equals minus the unoriented angle if the sign is
negative. -/
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
/-- The unoriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is zero if and only if the
unoriented angle is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The oriented angle between three points is `π` if and only if the unoriented angle is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `π / 2`, so is the unoriented angle. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `π / 2`, so is the unoriented angle
(reversed). -/
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the unoriented angle is `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the unoriented angle (reversed) is
`π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
/-- Swapping the first and second points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
/-- Swapping the first and third points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
/-- Swapping the second and third points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
/-- Rotating the points in an oriented angle does not change the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
/-- The oriented angle between three points is π if and only if the second point is strictly
between the other two. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at that
point is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at that
point (reversed) is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between three points is zero if and only if one of the first and third
points is weakly between the other two. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point by one weakly further away on the
same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
by_cases hp₁'p₂ : p₁' = p₂; · rw [hp₁'p₂, wbtw_self_iff] at h; exact False.elim (hp₁p₂ h)
rw [← oangle_add hp₁'p₂ hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, h.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero, zero_add]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point by one strictly further away on
the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_left h.ne_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point by one weakly further away on the
same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by rw [oangle_rev, h.oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂, ← oangle_rev]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point by one strictly further away on
the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_right h.ne_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point with the midpoint of the segment
between it and the second point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point with the midpoint of the segment
between the second point and that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₁) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_left]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point with the midpoint of the segment
between it and the second point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₃ p₂) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₃ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_right
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point with the midpoint of the segment
between the second point and that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₃) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_right]
/-- Replacing the first point by one on the same line but the opposite ray adds π to the oriented
angle. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
{p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi, oangle_add_swap h.left_ne h.right_ne hp₃p₂]
/-- Replacing the third point by one on the same line but the opposite ray adds π to the oriented
angle. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
{p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi, oangle_add hp₁p₂ h.right_ne h.left_ne]
/-- Replacing both the first and third points by ones on the same lines but the opposite rays
does not change the oriented angle (vertically opposite angles). -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h₁ : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁')
(h₃ : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃' := by
rw [h₁.oangle_eq_add_pi_left h₃.left_ne, h₃.oangle_eq_add_pi_right h₁.right_ne, add_assoc,
Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, add_zero]
/-- Replacing the first point by one on the same line does not change twice the oriented angle. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁'} : Set P)) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁'p₂ : p₁' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rcases h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw with (hw | hw | hw)
· have hw' : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁' := ⟨hw, hp₁p₂.symm, hp₁'p₂.symm⟩
rw [hw'.oangle_eq_add_pi_left hp₃p₂, smul_add, Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi, add_zero]
· rw [hw.oangle_eq_left hp₁'p₂]
· rw [hw.symm.oangle_eq_left hp₁p₂]
/-- Replacing the third point by one on the same line does not change twice the oriented angle. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₃, p₂, p₃'} : Set P)) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) (hp₃'p₂ : p₃' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by
rw [oangle_rev, smul_neg, h.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂ hp₃'p₂, ← smul_neg, ← oangle_rev]
/-- Two different points are equidistant from a third point if and only if that third point
equals some multiple of a `π / 2` rotation of the vector between those points, plus the midpoint
of those points. -/
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint {p₁ p₂ p : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p = dist p₂ p ↔
∃ r : ℝ, r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ = p := by
refine ⟨fun hd => ?_, fun hr => ?_⟩
· have hi : ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, p -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, ←
mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm] at hd
simp_rw [vsub_midpoint, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₁ p, inner_sub_left, inner_add_right,
inner_smul_right, hd, real_inner_comm (p -ᵥ p₁)]
abel
rw [@Orientation.inner_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two V _ _ _ o,
or_iff_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 h.symm)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [eq_comm, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hr
exact ⟨r, hr.symm⟩
· rcases hr with ⟨r, rfl⟩
simp_rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, left_vsub_midpoint, right_vsub_midpoint,
invOf_eq_inv, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, ← mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_sub_self]
simp [-neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
open AffineSubspace
/-- Given two pairs of distinct points on the same line, such that the vectors between those
pairs of points are on the same ray (oriented in the same direction on that line), and a fifth
point, the angles at the fifth point between each of those two pairs of points have the same
sign. -/
| theorem _root_.Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (p₅ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) (hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P))
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 593 | 594 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Adam Topaz, Johan Commelin, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ImageToKernel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Exact sequences in abelian categories
In an abelian category, we get several interesting results related to exactness which are not
true in more general settings.
## Main results
* A short complex `S` is exact iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
* If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` has the universal property of the kernel of `g`.
* `f` is a monomorphism iff `kernel.ι f = 0` iff `Exact 0 f`, and `f` is an epimorphism iff
`cokernel.π = 0` iff `Exact f 0`.
* A faithful functor between abelian categories that preserves zero morphisms reflects exact
sequences.
* `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ 0` is exact if and only if the second map is a cokernel of the first, and
`0 ⟶ X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z` is exact if and only if the first map is a kernel of the second.
* A functor `F` such that for all `S`, we have `S.Exact → (S.map F).Exact` preserves both
finite limits and colimits.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [Abelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace ShortComplex
variable (S : ShortComplex C)
attribute [local instance] hasEqualizers_of_hasKernels
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel' : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift]
have : factorThruImage S.f ≫ imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero = kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (kernel.ι _), kernel.lift_ι, imageToKernel',
Category.assoc, image.fac]
constructor
· intro
exact epi_of_epi_fac this
· intro
rw [← this]
apply epi_comp
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel']
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (imageSubobjectIso S.f).symm (kernelSubobjectIso S.g).symm
theorem exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ IsIso (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
apply isIso_of_mono_of_epi
· intro
infer_instance
/-- In an abelian category, a short complex `S` is exact
iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
-/
theorem exact_iff_image_eq_kernel : S.Exact ↔ imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g := by
rw [exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
exact Subobject.eq_of_comm (asIso (imageToKernel _ _ S.zero)) (by simp)
· intro h
exact ⟨Subobject.ofLE _ _ h.ge, by ext; simp, by ext; simp⟩
theorem exact_iff_of_forks {cg : KernelFork S.g} (hg : IsLimit cg) {cf : CokernelCofork S.f}
(hf : IsColimit cf) : S.Exact ↔ cg.ι ≫ cf.π = 0 := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero]
let e₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg
let e₂ := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf
have : cg.ι ≫ cf.π = e₁.inv ≫ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f ≫ e₂.hom := by
have eq₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg (.zero)
have eq₂ := IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf (.one)
dsimp at eq₁ eq₂
rw [← eq₁, ← eq₂, Category.assoc]
rw [this, IsIso.comp_left_eq_zero e₁.inv, ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero _ e₂.hom]
variable {S}
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.image.ι S.f` is a kernel of `S.g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Abelian.image.ι S.f)
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
exact KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun u hu ↦ kernel.lift (cokernel.π S.f) u
(by rw [← kernel.lift_ι S.g u hu, Category.assoc, h, comp_zero])) (by simp)
(fun _ _ _ hm => by rw [← cancel_mono (Abelian.image.ι S.f), hm, kernel.lift_ι])
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` is a kernel of `g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage' (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Limits.image.ι S.f)
(image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _ h.isLimitImage (Abelian.imageIsoImage S.f).symm <| IsImage.lift_fac _ _
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.coimage.π g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitCoimage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit
(CokernelCofork.ofπ (Abelian.coimage.π S.g) (Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero) :
CokernelCofork S.f) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
refine CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _
(fun u hu => cokernel.desc (kernel.ι S.g) u
(by rw [← cokernel.π_desc S.f u hu, ← Category.assoc, h, zero_comp]))
(by simp) ?_
intros _ _ _ _ hm
ext
rw [hm, cokernel.π_desc]
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `factorThruImage g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.factorThruImage S.g)
(comp_factorThruImage_eq_zero S.zero)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _ h.isColimitCoimage (Abelian.coimageIsoImage' S.g) <|
(cancel_mono (Limits.image.ι S.g)).1 <| by simp
theorem exact_kernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk (kernel.ι f) f (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ (kernelIsKernel f)
theorem exact_cokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk f (cokernel.π f) (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ (cokernelIsCokernel f)
variable (S)
theorem exact_iff_exact_image_ι :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk (Abelian.image.ι S.f) S.g
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := Abelian.factorThruImage S.f
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _ }
theorem exact_iff_exact_coimage_π :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk S.f (Abelian.coimage.π S.g)
(Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact := by
symm
exact ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := Abelian.factorThruCoimage S.g }
end ShortComplex
section
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Mono f, kernel.ι f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk (0 : Z ⟶ X) f zero_comp).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := mono_of_kernel_ι_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| _ => by rw [← cancel_mono f, kernel.condition, zero_comp]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 1 := ShortComplex.exact_iff_mono _ (by simp)
tfae_finish
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Epi f, cokernel.π f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := epi_of_cokernel_π_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| _ => by rw [← cancel_epi f, cokernel.condition, comp_zero]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 1 := ShortComplex.exact_iff_epi _ (by simp)
tfae_finish
end
namespace Functor
section
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [Abelian D]
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
lemma reflects_exact_of_faithful [F.Faithful] (S : ShortComplex C) (hS : (S.map F).Exact) :
S.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at hS ⊢
dsimp at hS
apply F.zero_of_map_zero
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ :=
kernel.lift' (F.map S.g) (F.map (kernel.ι S.g))
(by simp only [← F.map_comp, kernel.condition, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_zero])
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
cokernel.desc' (F.map S.f) (F.map (cokernel.π S.f))
(by simp only [← F.map_comp, cokernel.condition, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_zero])
rw [F.map_comp, ← hl, ← hk, Category.assoc, reassoc_of% hS, zero_comp, comp_zero]
end
end Functor
namespace Functor
open Limits Abelian
variable {A : Type u₁} {B : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} A] [Category.{v₂} B]
variable [Abelian A] [Abelian B]
variable (L : A ⥤ B)
section
variable [L.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
variable (hL : ∀ (S : ShortComplex A), S.Exact → (S.map L).Exact)
include hL
open ZeroObject
/-- A functor which preserves exactness preserves monomorphisms. -/
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_map_exact : L.PreservesMonomorphisms where
preserves f hf := by
apply ((Abelian.tfae_mono (L.map f) (L.obj 0)).out 2 0).mp
refine ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ?_ (hL _ (((tfae_mono f 0).out 0 2).mp hf))
exact ShortComplex.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
/-- A functor which preserves exactness preserves epimorphisms. -/
theorem preservesEpimorphisms_of_map_exact : L.PreservesEpimorphisms where
preserves f hf := by
apply ((Abelian.tfae_epi (L.map f) (L.obj 0)).out 2 0).mp
refine ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ?_ (hL _ (((tfae_epi f 0).out 0 2).mp hf))
exact ShortComplex.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
/-- A functor which preserves the exactness of short complexes preserves homology. -/
lemma preservesHomology_of_map_exact : L.PreservesHomology where
preservesCokernels X Y f := by
have := preservesEpimorphisms_of_map_exact _ hL
apply preservesColimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone (cokernelIsCokernel f)
apply (CokernelCofork.isColimitMapCoconeEquiv _ L).2
have : Epi ((ShortComplex.mk _ _ (cokernel.condition f)).map L).g := by
dsimp
infer_instance
exact (hL (ShortComplex.mk _ _ (cokernel.condition f))
(ShortComplex.exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ (cokernelIsCokernel f))).gIsCokernel
preservesKernels X Y f := by
have := preservesMonomorphisms_of_map_exact _ hL
apply preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (kernelIsKernel f)
apply (KernelFork.isLimitMapConeEquiv _ L).2
have : Mono ((ShortComplex.mk _ _ (kernel.condition f)).map L).f := by
dsimp
infer_instance
exact (hL (ShortComplex.mk _ _ (kernel.condition f))
(ShortComplex.exact_of_f_is_kernel _ (kernelIsKernel f))).fIsKernel
end
section
/-- A functor preserving zero morphisms, monos, and cokernels preserves homology. -/
lemma preservesHomology_of_preservesMonos_and_cokernels [PreservesZeroMorphisms L]
[PreservesMonomorphisms L] [∀ {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y), PreservesColimit (parallelPair f 0) L] :
PreservesHomology L := by
apply preservesHomology_of_map_exact
intro S hS
let φ : (ShortComplex.mk _ _ (Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero)).map L ⟶ S.map L :=
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := L.map (Abelian.factorThruCoimage S.g)
comm₂₃ := by
dsimp
rw [Category.id_comp, ← L.map_comp, cokernel.π_desc] }
apply (ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono φ).1
apply ShortComplex.exact_of_g_is_cokernel
exact CokernelCofork.mapIsColimit _ ((S.exact_iff_exact_coimage_π).1 hS).gIsCokernel L
/-- A functor preserving zero morphisms, epis, and kernels preserves homology. -/
lemma preservesHomology_of_preservesEpis_and_kernels [PreservesZeroMorphisms L]
[PreservesEpimorphisms L] [∀ {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y), PreservesLimit (parallelPair f 0) L] :
PreservesHomology L := by
apply preservesHomology_of_map_exact
intro S hS
let φ : S.map L ⟶ (ShortComplex.mk _ _ (Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero)).map L :=
{ τ₁ := L.map (Abelian.factorThruImage S.f)
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _
comm₁₂ := by
dsimp
rw [Category.comp_id, ← L.map_comp, kernel.lift_ι] }
apply (ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono φ).2
apply ShortComplex.exact_of_f_is_kernel
exact KernelFork.mapIsLimit _ ((S.exact_iff_exact_image_ι).1 hS).fIsKernel L
end
end Functor
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Exact.lean | 313 | 316 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Natural operations on ordinals
The goal of this file is to define natural addition and multiplication on ordinals, also known as
the Hessenberg sum and product, and provide a basic API. The natural addition of two ordinals
`a ♯ b` is recursively defined as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for `a' < a`
and `b' < b`. The natural multiplication `a ⨳ b` is likewise recursively defined as the least
ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for any `a' < a` and
`b' < b`.
These operations form a rich algebraic structure: they're commutative, associative, preserve order,
have the usual `0` and `1` from ordinals, and distribute over one another.
Moreover, these operations are the addition and multiplication of ordinals when viewed as
combinatorial `Game`s. This makes them particularly useful for game theory.
Finally, both operations admit simple, intuitive descriptions in terms of the Cantor normal form.
The natural addition of two ordinals corresponds to adding their Cantor normal forms as if they were
polynomials in `ω`. Likewise, their natural multiplication corresponds to multiplying the Cantor
normal forms as polynomials.
## Implementation notes
Given the rich algebraic structure of these two operations, we choose to create a type synonym
`NatOrdinal`, where we provide the appropriate instances. However, to avoid casting back and forth
between both types, we attempt to prove and state most results on `Ordinal`.
## Todo
- Prove the characterizations of natural addition and multiplication in terms of the Cantor normal
form.
-/
universe u v
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
/-! ### Basic casts between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal` -/
/-- A type synonym for ordinals with natural addition and multiplication. -/
def NatOrdinal : Type _ :=
Ordinal deriving Zero, Inhabited, One, WellFoundedRelation
-- The `LinearOrder, `SuccOrder` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance NatOrdinal.instLinearOrder : LinearOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instLinearOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instSuccOrder : SuccOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instSuccOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instOrderBot : OrderBot NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instOrderBot
instance NatOrdinal.instNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instNoMaxOrder
instance NatOrdinal.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass NatOrdinal := Ordinal.instZeroLEOneClass
instance NatOrdinal.instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : NatOrdinal) := Ordinal.instNeZeroOne
instance NatOrdinal.uncountable : Uncountable NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.uncountable
/-- The identity function between `Ordinal` and `NatOrdinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def Ordinal.toNatOrdinal : Ordinal ≃o NatOrdinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
/-- The identity function between `NatOrdinal` and `Ordinal`. -/
@[match_pattern]
def NatOrdinal.toOrdinal : NatOrdinal ≃o Ordinal :=
OrderIso.refl _
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_symm_eq : NatOrdinal.toOrdinal.symm = Ordinal.toNatOrdinal :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_toNatOrdinal (a : NatOrdinal) : a.toOrdinal.toNatOrdinal = a :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded NatOrdinal (· < ·) :=
Ordinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedLT NatOrdinal :=
Ordinal.wellFoundedLT
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot NatOrdinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
@[simp] theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : NatOrdinal) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_zero : toOrdinal 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_one : toOrdinal 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_eq_zero {a} : toOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem toOrdinal_eq_one {a} : toOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_max (a b : NatOrdinal) : toOrdinal (max a b) = max (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_min (a b : NatOrdinal) : toOrdinal (min a b) = min (toOrdinal a) (toOrdinal b) :=
rfl
theorem succ_def (a : NatOrdinal) : succ a = toNatOrdinal (toOrdinal a + 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_le (o : NatOrdinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
Ordinal.zero_le o
theorem not_lt_zero (o : NatOrdinal) : ¬ o < 0 :=
Ordinal.not_lt_zero o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {o : NatOrdinal} : o < 1 ↔ o = 0 :=
Ordinal.lt_one_iff_zero
/-- A recursor for `NatOrdinal`. Use as `induction x`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator, induction_eliminator]
protected def rec {β : NatOrdinal → Sort*} (h : ∀ a, β (toNatOrdinal a)) : ∀ a, β a := fun a =>
h (toOrdinal a)
/-- `Ordinal.induction` but for `NatOrdinal`. -/
theorem induction {p : NatOrdinal → Prop} : ∀ (i) (_ : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j), p i :=
Ordinal.induction
instance small_Iio (a : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio a) := Ordinal.small_Iio a
instance small_Iic (a : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic a) := Ordinal.small_Iic a
instance small_Ico (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ico a b) := Ordinal.small_Ico a b
instance small_Icc (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Icc a b) := Ordinal.small_Icc a b
instance small_Ioo (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ioo a b) := Ordinal.small_Ioo a b
instance small_Ioc (a b : NatOrdinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Ioc a b) := Ordinal.small_Ioc a b
end NatOrdinal
namespace Ordinal
variable {a b c : Ordinal.{u}}
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_symm_eq : toNatOrdinal.symm = NatOrdinal.toOrdinal := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_toOrdinal (a : Ordinal) : a.toNatOrdinal.toOrdinal = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_zero : toNatOrdinal 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_one : toNatOrdinal 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_zero (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem toNatOrdinal_eq_one (a) : toNatOrdinal a = 1 ↔ a = 1 := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_max (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (max a b) = max (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_min (a b : Ordinal) :
toNatOrdinal (min a b) = min (toNatOrdinal a) (toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
/-! We place the definitions of `nadd` and `nmul` before actually developing their API, as this
guarantees we only need to open the `NaturalOps` locale once. -/
/-- Natural addition on ordinals `a ♯ b`, also known as the Hessenberg sum, is recursively defined
as the least ordinal greater than `a' ♯ b` and `a ♯ b'` for all `a' < a` and `b' < b`. In contrast
to normal ordinal addition, it is commutative.
Natural addition can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from adding up
corresponding coefficients in the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b`. -/
noncomputable def nadd (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
max (⨆ x : Iio a, succ (nadd x.1 b)) (⨆ x : Iio b, succ (nadd a x.1))
termination_by (a, b)
decreasing_by all_goals cases x; decreasing_tactic
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:65 " ♯ " => Ordinal.nadd
open NaturalOps
/-- Natural multiplication on ordinals `a ⨳ b`, also known as the Hessenberg product, is recursively
defined as the least ordinal such that `a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b'` is greater than `a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b'` for all
`a' < a` and `b < b'`. In contrast to normal ordinal multiplication, it is commutative and
distributive (over natural addition).
Natural multiplication can equivalently be characterized as the ordinal resulting from multiplying
the Cantor normal forms of `a` and `b` as if they were polynomials in `ω`. Addition of exponents is
done via natural addition. -/
noncomputable def nmul (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Ordinal.{u} :=
sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, nmul a' b ♯ nmul a b' < c ♯ nmul a' b'}
termination_by (a, b)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NaturalOps] infixl:70 " ⨳ " => Ordinal.nmul
/-! ### Natural addition -/
theorem lt_nadd_iff : a < b ♯ c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' ♯ c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b ♯ c' := by
rw [nadd]
simp [Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff]
theorem nadd_le_iff : b ♯ c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' ♯ c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b ♯ c' < a := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_nadd_iff]
simp
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_left (h : b < c) (a) : a ♯ b < a ♯ c :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_right (h : b < c) (a) : b ♯ a < c ♯ a :=
lt_nadd_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨b, h, le_rfl⟩)
theorem nadd_le_nadd_left (h : b ≤ c) (a) : a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_left h a).le
· exact le_rfl
theorem nadd_le_nadd_right (h : b ≤ c) (a) : b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h | rfl)
· exact (nadd_lt_nadd_right h a).le
· exact le_rfl
variable (a b)
theorem nadd_comm (a b) : a ♯ b = b ♯ a := by
rw [nadd, nadd, max_comm]
congr <;> ext x <;> cases x <;> apply congr_arg _ (nadd_comm _ _)
termination_by (a, b)
@[deprecated "blsub will soon be deprecated" (since := "2024-11-18")]
theorem blsub_nadd_of_mono {f : ∀ c < a ♯ b, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) :
blsub.{u,v} _ f =
max (blsub.{u, v} a fun a' ha' => f (a' ♯ b) <| nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b)
(blsub.{u, v} b fun b' hb' => f (a ♯ b') <| nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) := by
apply (blsub_le_iff.2 fun i h => _).antisymm (max_le _ _)
· intro i h
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 h with (⟨a', ha', hi⟩ | ⟨b', hb', hi⟩)
· exact lt_max_of_lt_left ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_right ha' b) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ ha'))
· exact lt_max_of_lt_right ((hf h (nadd_lt_nadd_left hb' a) hi).trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ hb'))
all_goals
apply blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{u, u, v}
rintro c ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
private theorem iSup_nadd_of_monotone {a b} (f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) (h : Monotone f) :
⨆ x : Iio (a ♯ b), f x = max (⨆ a' : Iio a, f (a'.1 ♯ b)) (⨆ b' : Iio b, f (a ♯ b'.1)) := by
apply (max_le _ _).antisymm'
· rw [Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx, hi⟩ | ⟨x, hx, hi⟩ := lt_nadd_iff.1 hi
· exact le_max_of_le_left ((h hi).trans <| Ordinal.le_iSup (fun x : Iio a ↦ _) ⟨x, hx⟩)
· exact le_max_of_le_right ((h hi).trans <| Ordinal.le_iSup (fun x : Iio b ↦ _) ⟨x, hx⟩)
all_goals
apply csSup_le_csSup' (bddAbove_of_small _)
rintro _ ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, rfl⟩
refine mem_range_self (⟨_, ?_⟩ : Iio _)
apply_rules [nadd_lt_nadd_left, nadd_lt_nadd_right]
theorem nadd_assoc (a b c) : a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ (b ♯ c) := by
unfold nadd
rw [iSup_nadd_of_monotone fun a' ↦ succ (a' ♯ c), iSup_nadd_of_monotone fun b' ↦ succ (a ♯ b'),
max_assoc]
· congr <;> ext x <;> cases x <;> apply congr_arg _ (nadd_assoc _ _ _)
· exact succ_mono.comp fun x y h ↦ nadd_le_nadd_left h _
· exact succ_mono.comp fun x y h ↦ nadd_le_nadd_right h _
termination_by (a, b, c)
@[simp]
theorem nadd_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ♯ 0 = a := by
rw [nadd, ciSup_of_empty fun _ : Iio 0 ↦ _, sup_bot_eq]
convert iSup_succ a
rename_i x
cases x
exact nadd_zero _
termination_by a
@[simp]
theorem zero_nadd : 0 ♯ a = a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nadd_one (a : Ordinal) : a ♯ 1 = succ a := by
rw [nadd, ciSup_unique (s := fun _ : Iio 1 ↦ _), Iio_one_default_eq, nadd_zero,
max_eq_right_iff, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rwa [nadd_one, succ_le_succ_iff, succ_le_iff]
termination_by a
@[simp]
theorem one_nadd : 1 ♯ a = succ a := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_one]
theorem nadd_succ : a ♯ succ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← nadd_one (a ♯ b), nadd_assoc, nadd_one]
theorem succ_nadd : succ a ♯ b = succ (a ♯ b) := by rw [← one_nadd (a ♯ b), ← nadd_assoc, one_nadd]
@[simp]
theorem nadd_nat (n : ℕ) : a ♯ n = a + n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, nadd_succ, add_succ, hn]
@[simp]
theorem nat_nadd (n : ℕ) : ↑n ♯ a = a + n := by rw [nadd_comm, nadd_nat]
theorem add_le_nadd : a + b ≤ a ♯ b := by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp
| succ c h =>
rwa [add_succ, nadd_succ, succ_le_succ_iff]
| isLimit c hc H =>
rw [(isNormal_add_right a).apply_of_isLimit hc, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff]
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
exact (H i hi).trans (nadd_le_nadd_left hi.le a)
end Ordinal
namespace NatOrdinal
open Ordinal NaturalOps
instance : Add NatOrdinal := ⟨nadd⟩
instance : SuccAddOrder NatOrdinal := ⟨fun x => (nadd_one x).symm⟩
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : NatOrdinal} :
a < b + c ↔ (∃ b' < b, a ≤ b' + c) ∨ ∃ c' < c, a ≤ b + c' :=
Ordinal.lt_nadd_iff
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : NatOrdinal} :
b + c ≤ a ↔ (∀ b' < b, b' + c < a) ∧ ∀ c' < c, b + c' < a :=
Ordinal.nadd_le_iff
instance : AddLeftStrictMono NatOrdinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_lt_nadd_left h a⟩
instance : AddLeftMono NatOrdinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _ _ h => nadd_le_nadd_left h a⟩
instance : AddLeftReflectLE NatOrdinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c h => by
by_contra! h'
exact h.not_lt (add_lt_add_left h' a)⟩
instance : AddCommMonoid NatOrdinal :=
{ add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := nadd_assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_nadd
add_zero := nadd_zero
add_comm := nadd_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec }
instance : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid NatOrdinal :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun _ _ => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun _ _ _ => le_of_add_le_add_left }
instance : AddMonoidWithOne NatOrdinal :=
AddMonoidWithOne.unary
@[simp]
theorem toOrdinal_natCast (n : ℕ) : toOrdinal n = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· rfl
· change (toOrdinal n) ♯ 1 = n + 1
rw [hn]; exact nadd_one n
instance : CharZero NatOrdinal where
cast_injective m n h := by
apply_fun toOrdinal at h
simpa using h
end NatOrdinal
open NatOrdinal
open NaturalOps
namespace Ordinal
theorem nadd_eq_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ♯ b = toOrdinal (toNatOrdinal a + toNatOrdinal b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNatOrdinal_natCast (n : ℕ) : toNatOrdinal n = n := by
rw [← toOrdinal_natCast n]
rfl
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
theorem lt_of_nadd_lt_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a → b < c :=
@lt_of_add_lt_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_left : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_left NatOrdinal _ _ _
theorem le_of_nadd_le_nadd_right : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a → b ≤ c :=
@le_of_add_le_add_right NatOrdinal _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b < a ♯ c ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a < c ♯ a ↔ b < c :=
@add_lt_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_left : ∀ (a) {b c}, a ♯ b ≤ a ♯ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
@add_le_add_iff_left NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_le_nadd_iff_right : ∀ (a) {b c}, b ♯ a ≤ c ♯ a ↔ b ≤ c :=
@_root_.add_le_add_iff_right NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_le_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c ≤ b ♯ d :=
@add_le_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_lt_nadd : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le : ∀ {a b c d}, a < b → c ≤ d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c < d → a ♯ c < b ♯ d :=
@add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt NatOrdinal _ _ _ _
theorem nadd_left_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c → b = c :=
@_root_.add_left_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
theorem nadd_right_cancel : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = c ♯ b → a = c :=
@_root_.add_right_cancel NatOrdinal _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_left_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, a ♯ b = a ♯ c ↔ b = c :=
@add_left_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
@[simp]
theorem nadd_right_cancel_iff : ∀ {a b c}, b ♯ a = c ♯ a ↔ b = c :=
@add_right_cancel_iff NatOrdinal _ _
theorem le_nadd_self {a b} : a ≤ b ♯ a := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_nadd_left {a b c} (h : a ≤ c) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_nadd_self.trans (nadd_le_nadd_left h b)
theorem le_self_nadd {a b} : a ≤ a ♯ b := by simpa using nadd_le_nadd_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_nadd_right {a b c} (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b ♯ c :=
le_self_nadd.trans (nadd_le_nadd_right h c)
theorem nadd_left_comm : ∀ a b c, a ♯ (b ♯ c) = b ♯ (a ♯ c) :=
@add_left_comm NatOrdinal _
theorem nadd_right_comm : ∀ a b c, a ♯ b ♯ c = a ♯ c ♯ b :=
@add_right_comm NatOrdinal _
/-! ### Natural multiplication -/
variable {a b c d : Ordinal.{u}}
@[deprecated "avoid using the definition of `nmul` directly" (since := "2024-11-19")]
theorem nmul_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ⨳ b = sInf {c | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b'} := by
rw [nmul]
/-- The set in the definition of `nmul` is nonempty. -/
private theorem nmul_nonempty (a b : Ordinal.{u}) :
{c : Ordinal.{u} | ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b'}.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : BddAbove ((fun x ↦ x.1 ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ x.2) '' Set.Iio a ×ˢ Set.Iio b) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
exact ⟨_, fun x hx y hy ↦
(lt_succ_of_le <| hc <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| Set.mk_mem_prod hx hy).trans_le le_self_nadd⟩
theorem nmul_nadd_lt {a' b' : Ordinal} (ha : a' < a) (hb : b' < b) :
a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
conv_rhs => rw [nmul]
exact csInf_mem (nmul_nonempty a b) a' ha b' hb
theorem nmul_nadd_le {a' b' : Ordinal} (ha : a' ≤ a) (hb : b' ≤ b) :
a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' ≤ a ⨳ b ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hb with (hb | rfl)
· exact (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb).le
· rw [nadd_comm]
· exact le_rfl
theorem lt_nmul_iff : c < a ⨳ b ↔ ∃ a' < a, ∃ b' < b, c ♯ a' ⨳ b' ≤ a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [nmul] at h
simpa using not_mem_of_lt_csInf h ⟨0, fun _ _ => bot_le⟩
· rintro ⟨a', ha, b', hb, h⟩
have := h.trans_lt (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb)
rwa [nadd_lt_nadd_iff_right] at this
theorem nmul_le_iff : a ⨳ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ a' < a, ∀ b' < b, a' ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ b' < c ♯ a' ⨳ b' := by
rw [← not_iff_not]; simp [lt_nmul_iff]
theorem nmul_comm (a b) : a ⨳ b = b ⨳ a := by
rw [nmul, nmul]
congr; ext x; constructor <;> intro H c hc d hd
· rw [nadd_comm, ← nmul_comm, ← nmul_comm a, ← nmul_comm d]
exact H _ hd _ hc
· rw [nadd_comm, nmul_comm, nmul_comm c, nmul_comm c]
exact H _ hd _ hc
termination_by (a, b)
@[simp]
theorem nmul_zero (a) : a ⨳ 0 = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, nmul_le_iff]
exact fun _ _ a ha => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero a ha).elim
@[simp]
theorem zero_nmul (a) : 0 ⨳ a = 0 := by rw [nmul_comm, nmul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nmul_one (a : Ordinal) : a ⨳ 1 = a := by
rw [nmul]
convert csInf_Ici
ext b
refine ⟨fun H ↦ le_of_forall_lt (a := a) fun c hc ↦ ?_, fun ha c hc ↦ ?_⟩
-- Porting note: had to add arguments to `nmul_one` in the next two lines
-- for the termination checker.
· simpa [nmul_one c] using H c hc
· simpa [nmul_one c] using hc.trans_le ha
termination_by a
@[simp]
theorem one_nmul (a) : 1 ⨳ a = a := by rw [nmul_comm, nmul_one]
theorem nmul_lt_nmul_of_pos_left (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : 0 < c) : c ⨳ a < c ⨳ b :=
lt_nmul_iff.2 ⟨0, h₂, a, h₁, by simp⟩
theorem nmul_lt_nmul_of_pos_right (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : 0 < c) : a ⨳ c < b ⨳ c :=
lt_nmul_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, 0, h₂, by simp⟩
theorem nmul_le_nmul_left (h : a ≤ b) (c) : c ⨳ a ≤ c ⨳ b := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h₁ | rfl) <;> rcases (eq_zero_or_pos c).symm with (h₂ | rfl)
· exact (nmul_lt_nmul_of_pos_left h₁ h₂).le
all_goals simp
theorem nmul_le_nmul_right (h : a ≤ b) (c) : a ⨳ c ≤ b ⨳ c := by
rw [nmul_comm, nmul_comm b]
exact nmul_le_nmul_left h c
theorem nmul_nadd (a b c : Ordinal) : a ⨳ (b ♯ c) = a ⨳ b ♯ a ⨳ c := by
refine le_antisymm (nmul_le_iff.2 fun a' ha d hd => ?_)
(nadd_le_iff.2 ⟨fun d hd => ?_, fun d hd => ?_⟩)
· rw [nmul_nadd]
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 hd with (⟨b', hb, hd⟩ | ⟨c', hc, hd⟩)
· have := nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb) (nmul_nadd_le ha.le hd)
rw [nmul_nadd, nmul_nadd] at this
simp only [nadd_assoc] at this
rwa [nadd_left_comm, nadd_left_comm _ (a ⨳ b'), nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ b),
nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_left_comm (a' ⨳ b), nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ b),
nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, ← nadd_assoc, ← nadd_assoc] at this
· have := nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt (nmul_nadd_le ha.le hd) (nmul_nadd_lt ha hc)
rw [nmul_nadd, nmul_nadd] at this
simp only [nadd_assoc] at this
rwa [nadd_left_comm, nadd_comm (a ⨳ c), nadd_left_comm (a' ⨳ d), nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ c'),
nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ b), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_comm (a' ⨳ c), nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ d),
nadd_left_comm (a' ⨳ b), nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ b), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_comm (a ⨳ d),
nadd_comm (a' ⨳ d), ← nadd_assoc, ← nadd_assoc] at this
· rcases lt_nmul_iff.1 hd with ⟨a', ha, b', hb, hd⟩
have := nadd_lt_nadd_of_le_of_lt hd (nmul_nadd_lt ha (nadd_lt_nadd_right hb c))
rw [nmul_nadd, nmul_nadd, nmul_nadd a'] at this
simp only [nadd_assoc] at this
rwa [nadd_left_comm (a' ⨳ b'), nadd_left_comm, nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_left_comm,
nadd_left_comm _ (a' ⨳ b'), nadd_left_comm (a ⨳ b'), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left,
nadd_left_comm (a' ⨳ c), nadd_left_comm, nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_left_comm,
nadd_comm _ (a' ⨳ c), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left] at this
· rcases lt_nmul_iff.1 hd with ⟨a', ha, c', hc, hd⟩
have := nadd_lt_nadd_of_lt_of_le (nmul_nadd_lt ha (nadd_lt_nadd_left hc b)) hd
rw [nmul_nadd, nmul_nadd, nmul_nadd a'] at this
simp only [nadd_assoc] at this
rwa [nadd_left_comm _ (a' ⨳ b), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_left_comm (a' ⨳ c'),
nadd_left_comm _ (a' ⨳ c), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_left_comm, nadd_comm (a' ⨳ c'),
nadd_left_comm _ (a ⨳ c'), nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left, nadd_comm _ (a' ⨳ c'),
nadd_comm _ (a' ⨳ c'), nadd_left_comm, nadd_lt_nadd_iff_left] at this
termination_by (a, b, c)
theorem nadd_nmul (a b c) : (a ♯ b) ⨳ c = a ⨳ c ♯ b ⨳ c := by
rw [nmul_comm, nmul_nadd, nmul_comm, nmul_comm c]
theorem nmul_nadd_lt₃ {a' b' c' : Ordinal} (ha : a' < a) (hb : b' < b) (hc : c' < c) :
a' ⨳ b ⨳ c ♯ a ⨳ b' ⨳ c ♯ a ⨳ b ⨳ c' ♯ a' ⨳ b' ⨳ c' <
a ⨳ b ⨳ c ♯ a' ⨳ b' ⨳ c ♯ a' ⨳ b ⨳ c' ♯ a ⨳ b' ⨳ c' := by
simpa only [nadd_nmul, ← nadd_assoc] using nmul_nadd_lt (nmul_nadd_lt ha hb) hc
theorem nmul_nadd_le₃ {a' b' c' : Ordinal} (ha : a' ≤ a) (hb : b' ≤ b) (hc : c' ≤ c) :
a' ⨳ b ⨳ c ♯ a ⨳ b' ⨳ c ♯ a ⨳ b ⨳ c' ♯ a' ⨳ b' ⨳ c' ≤
a ⨳ b ⨳ c ♯ a' ⨳ b' ⨳ c ♯ a' ⨳ b ⨳ c' ♯ a ⨳ b' ⨳ c' := by
simpa only [nadd_nmul, ← nadd_assoc] using nmul_nadd_le (nmul_nadd_le ha hb) hc
private theorem nmul_nadd_lt₃' {a' b' c' : Ordinal} (ha : a' < a) (hb : b' < b) (hc : c' < c) :
| a' ⨳ (b ⨳ c) ♯ a ⨳ (b' ⨳ c) ♯ a ⨳ (b ⨳ c') ♯ a' ⨳ (b' ⨳ c') <
a ⨳ (b ⨳ c) ♯ a' ⨳ (b' ⨳ c) ♯ a' ⨳ (b ⨳ c') ♯ a ⨳ (b' ⨳ c') := by
simp only [nmul_comm _ (_ ⨳ _)]
convert nmul_nadd_lt₃ hb hc ha using 1 <;>
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/NaturalOps.lean | 601 | 604 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.ExteriorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Defs
/-!
# Contraction in Clifford Algebras
This file contains some of the results from [grinberg_clifford_2016][].
The key result is `CliffordAlgebra.equivExterior`.
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft`: contract a multivector by a `Module.Dual R M` on the left.
* `CliffordAlgebra.contractRight`: contract a multivector by a `Module.Dual R M` on the right.
* `CliffordAlgebra.changeForm`: convert between two algebras of different quadratic form, sending
vectors to vectors. The difference of the quadratic forms must be a bilinear form.
* `CliffordAlgebra.equivExterior`: in characteristic not-two, the `CliffordAlgebra Q` is
isomorphic as a module to the exterior algebra.
## Implementation notes
This file somewhat follows [grinberg_clifford_2016][], although we are missing some of the induction
principles needed to prove many of the results. Here, we avoid the quotient-based approach described
in [grinberg_clifford_2016][], instead directly constructing our objects using the universal
property.
Note that [grinberg_clifford_2016][] concludes that its contents are not novel, and are in fact just
a rehash of parts of [bourbaki2007][]; we should at some point consider swapping our references to
refer to the latter.
Within this file, we use the local notation
* `x ⌊ d` for `contractRight x d`
* `d ⌋ x` for `contractLeft d x`
-/
open LinearMap (BilinMap BilinForm)
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R : Type u1} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type u2} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section contractLeft
variable (d d' : Module.Dual R M)
/-- Auxiliary construction for `CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft` -/
@[simps!]
def contractLeftAux (d : Module.Dual R M) :
M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q × CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
haveI v_mul := (Algebra.lmul R (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q
d.smulRight (LinearMap.fst _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) (CliffordAlgebra Q)) -
v_mul.compl₂ (LinearMap.snd _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) _)
theorem contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux (v : M) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (fx : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractLeftAux Q d v (ι Q v * x, contractLeftAux Q d v (x, fx)) = Q v • fx := by
simp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← sub_add, mul_smul_comm, sub_self,
zero_add]
variable {Q}
/-- Contract an element of the clifford algebra with an element `d : Module.Dual R M` from the left.
Note that $v ⌋ x$ is spelt `contractLeft (Q.associated v) x`.
This includes [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 10.75 -/
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q where
toFun d := foldr' Q (contractLeftAux Q d) (contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d) 0
map_add' d₁ d₂ :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
rw [LinearMap.add_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with
| algebraMap => simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero, zero_add]
| add _ _ hx hy => rw [map_add, map_add, map_add, add_add_add_comm, hx, hy]
| ι_mul _ _ hx =>
rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [sub_add_sub_comm, mul_add, LinearMap.add_apply, add_smul]
map_smul' c d :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with
| algebraMap => simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero]
| add _ _ hx hy => rw [map_add, map_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
| ι_mul _ _ hx =>
rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_assoc, mul_smul_comm, smul_sub]
/-- Contract an element of the clifford algebra with an element `d : Module.Dual R M` from the
right.
Note that $x ⌊ v$ is spelt `contractRight x (Q.associated v)`.
This includes [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 16.75 -/
def contractRight : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearMap.flip (LinearMap.compl₂ (LinearMap.compr₂ contractLeft reverse) reverse)
theorem contractRight_eq (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractRight (Q := Q) x d = reverse (contractLeft (R := R) (M := M) d <| reverse x) :=
rfl
local infixl:70 "⌋" => contractLeft (R := R) (M := M)
local infixl:70 "⌊" => contractRight (R := R) (M := M) (Q := Q)
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 6 -/
theorem contractLeft_ι_mul (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(ι Q a * b) = d a • b - ι Q a * (d⌋b) := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine foldr'_ι_mul _ _ ?_ _ _ _
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 12 -/
theorem contractRight_mul_ι (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
b * ι Q a⌊d = d a • b - b⌊d * ι Q a := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractLeft_ι_mul, map_sub, map_smul,
reverse_reverse, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractRight_eq]
|
theorem contractLeft_algebraMap_mul (r : R) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(algebraMap _ _ r * b) = algebraMap _ _ r * (d⌋b) := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, map_smul, Algebra.smul_def]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 130 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
section congr
variable {g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.congr (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.congr (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.congr (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.congr (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
end congr
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
theorem ConvexOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem ConcaveOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
theorem LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.2 ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is concave it suffices to
verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`. The
main use case is `E = ℝ` however one can apply it, e.g., to `ℝ^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly convex, it suffices
to verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly concave it suffices
to verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
end LinearOrder
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If `g` is convex on `s`, so is `(f ∘ g)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.linear_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (g (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [g.map_add, g.map_smul, g.map_smul]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If `g` is concave on `s`, so is `(g ∘ f)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_linearMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
| f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 480 | 485 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.RCLike
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Hausdorff
/-!
# Hausdorff dimension
The Hausdorff dimension of a set `X` in an (extended) metric space is the unique number
`dimH s : ℝ≥0∞` such that for any `d : ℝ≥0` we have
- `μH[d] s = 0` if `dimH s < d`, and
- `μH[d] s = ∞` if `d < dimH s`.
In this file we define `dimH s` to be the Hausdorff dimension of `s`, then prove some basic
properties of Hausdorff dimension.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.dimH`: the Hausdorff dimension of a set. For the Hausdorff dimension of the whole
space we use `MeasureTheory.dimH (Set.univ : Set X)`.
## Main results
### Basic properties of Hausdorff dimension
* `hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH`, `dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top`,
`le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top`, `hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt`, `measure_zero_of_dimH_lt`,
`le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero`, `dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top`: various forms
of the characteristic property of the Hausdorff dimension;
* `dimH_union`: the Hausdorff dimension of the union of two sets is the maximum of their Hausdorff
dimensions.
* `dimH_iUnion`, `dimH_bUnion`, `dimH_sUnion`: the Hausdorff dimension of a countable union of sets
is the supremum of their Hausdorff dimensions;
* `dimH_empty`, `dimH_singleton`, `Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero`, `Set.Countable.dimH_zero` : `dimH s
= 0` whenever `s` is countable;
### (Pre)images under (anti)lipschitz and Hölder continuous maps
* `HolderWith.dimH_image_le` etc: if `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous with exponent `r > 0`, then
for any `s`, `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r`. We prove versions of this statement for `HolderWith`,
`HolderOnWith`, and locally Hölder maps, as well as for `Set.image` and `Set.range`.
* `LipschitzWith.dimH_image_le` etc: Lipschitz continuous maps do not increase the Hausdorff
dimension of sets.
* for a map that is known to be both Lipschitz and antilipschitz (e.g., for an `Isometry` or
a `ContinuousLinearEquiv`) we also prove `dimH (f '' s) = dimH s`.
### Hausdorff measure in `ℝⁿ`
* `Real.dimH_of_nonempty_interior`: if `s` is a set in a finite dimensional real vector space `E`
with nonempty interior, then the Hausdorff dimension of `s` is equal to the dimension of `E`.
* `dense_compl_of_dimH_lt_finrank`: if `s` is a set in a finite dimensional real vector space `E`
with Hausdorff dimension strictly less than the dimension of `E`, the `s` has a dense complement.
* `ContDiff.dense_compl_range_of_finrank_lt_finrank`: the complement to the range of a `C¹`
smooth map is dense provided that the dimension of the domain is strictly less than the dimension
of the codomain.
## Notations
We use the following notation localized in `MeasureTheory`. It is defined in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Hausdorff`.
- `μH[d]` : `MeasureTheory.Measure.hausdorffMeasure d`
## Implementation notes
* The definition of `dimH` explicitly uses `borel X` as a measurable space structure. This way we
can formulate lemmas about Hausdorff dimension without assuming that the environment has a
`[MeasurableSpace X]` instance that is equal but possibly not defeq to `borel X`.
Lemma `dimH_def` unfolds this definition using whatever `[MeasurableSpace X]` instance we have in
the environment (as long as it is equal to `borel X`).
* The definition `dimH` is irreducible; use API lemmas or `dimH_def` instead.
## Tags
Hausdorff measure, Hausdorff dimension, dimension
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set TopologicalSpace Module Filter
variable {ι X Y : Type*} [EMetricSpace X] [EMetricSpace Y]
/-- Hausdorff dimension of a set in an (e)metric space. -/
@[irreducible] noncomputable def dimH (s : Set X) : ℝ≥0∞ := by
borelize X; exact ⨆ (d : ℝ≥0) (_ : @hausdorffMeasure X _ _ ⟨rfl⟩ d s = ∞), d
/-!
### Basic properties
-/
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]
/-- Unfold the definition of `dimH` using `[MeasurableSpace X] [BorelSpace X]` from the
environment. -/
theorem dimH_def (s : Set X) : dimH s = ⨆ (d : ℝ≥0) (_ : μH[d] s = ∞), (d : ℝ≥0∞) := by
borelize X; rw [dimH]
theorem hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑d < dimH s) : μH[d] s = ∞ := by
simp only [dimH_def, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨d', hsd', hdd'⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hdd'
exact top_unique (hsd' ▸ hausdorffMeasure_mono hdd'.le _)
theorem dimH_le {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0∞} (H : ∀ d' : ℝ≥0, μH[d'] s = ∞ → ↑d' ≤ d) : dimH s ≤ d :=
(dimH_def s).trans_le <| iSup₂_le H
theorem dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s ≠ ∞) : dimH s ≤ d :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt hausdorffMeasure_of_lt_dimH h
theorem le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s = ∞) :
↑d ≤ dimH s := by
rw [dimH_def]; exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) d h
theorem hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : dimH s < d) : μH[d] s = 0 := by
rw [dimH_def] at h
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 h with ⟨d', hsd', hd'd⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hd'd
exact (hausdorffMeasure_zero_or_top hd'd s).resolve_right fun h₂ => hsd'.not_le <|
le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) d' h₂
theorem measure_zero_of_dimH_lt {μ : Measure X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μ ≪ μH[d]) {s : Set X}
(hd : dimH s < d) : μ s = 0 :=
h <| hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt hd
theorem le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero {s : Set X} {d : ℝ≥0} (h : μH[d] s ≠ 0) : ↑d ≤ dimH s :=
le_of_not_lt <| mt hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt h
theorem dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero_ne_top {d : ℝ≥0} {s : Set X} (h : μH[d] s ≠ 0)
(h' : μH[d] s ≠ ∞) : dimH s = d :=
le_antisymm (dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top h') (le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_zero h)
end Measurable
@[mono]
theorem dimH_mono {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : dimH s ≤ dimH t := by
borelize X
exact dimH_le fun d hd => le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top <| top_unique <| hd ▸ measure_mono h
theorem dimH_subsingleton {s : Set X} (h : s.Subsingleton) : dimH s = 0 := by
borelize X
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
refine dimH_le_of_hausdorffMeasure_ne_top ?_
exact ((hausdorffMeasure_le_one_of_subsingleton h le_rfl).trans_lt ENNReal.one_lt_top).ne
alias Set.Subsingleton.dimH_zero := dimH_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem dimH_empty : dimH (∅ : Set X) = 0 :=
subsingleton_empty.dimH_zero
@[simp]
theorem dimH_singleton (x : X) : dimH ({x} : Set X) = 0 :=
subsingleton_singleton.dimH_zero
@[simp]
theorem dimH_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set X) :
dimH (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, dimH (s i) := by
borelize X
refine le_antisymm (dimH_le fun d hd => ?_) (iSup_le fun i => dimH_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
contrapose! hd
have : ∀ i, μH[d] (s i) = 0 := fun i =>
hausdorffMeasure_of_dimH_lt ((le_iSup (fun i => dimH (s i)) i).trans_lt hd)
rw [measure_iUnion_null this]
exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem dimH_bUnion {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Countable) (t : ι → Set X) :
dimH (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, dimH (t i) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, dimH_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
@[simp]
theorem dimH_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Countable) : dimH (⋃₀ S) = ⨆ s ∈ S, dimH s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, dimH_bUnion hS]
@[simp]
theorem dimH_union (s t : Set X) : dimH (s ∪ t) = max (dimH s) (dimH t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, dimH_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq, cond, cond]
theorem dimH_countable {s : Set X} (hs : s.Countable) : dimH s = 0 :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ by simp only [dimH_bUnion hs, dimH_singleton, ENNReal.iSup_zero]
alias Set.Countable.dimH_zero := dimH_countable
theorem dimH_finite {s : Set X} (hs : s.Finite) : dimH s = 0 :=
hs.countable.dimH_zero
alias Set.Finite.dimH_zero := dimH_finite
@[simp]
theorem dimH_coe_finset (s : Finset X) : dimH (s : Set X) = 0 :=
s.finite_toSet.dimH_zero
alias Finset.dimH_zero := dimH_coe_finset
/-!
### Hausdorff dimension as the supremum of local Hausdorff dimensions
-/
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology X]
/-- If `r` is less than the Hausdorff dimension of a set `s` in an (extended) metric space with
second countable topology, then there exists a point `x ∈ s` such that every neighborhood
`t` of `x` within `s` has Hausdorff dimension greater than `r`. -/
theorem exists_mem_nhdsWithin_lt_dimH_of_lt_dimH {s : Set X} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < dimH s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, r < dimH t := by
contrapose! h; choose! t htx htr using h
rcases countable_cover_nhdsWithin htx with ⟨S, hSs, hSc, hSU⟩
calc
dimH s ≤ dimH (⋃ x ∈ S, t x) := dimH_mono hSU
_ = ⨆ x ∈ S, dimH (t x) := dimH_bUnion hSc _
_ ≤ r := iSup₂_le fun x hx => htr x <| hSs hx
/-- In an (extended) metric space with second countable topology, the Hausdorff dimension
of a set `s` is the supremum over `x ∈ s` of the limit superiors of `dimH t` along
`(𝓝[s] x).smallSets`. -/
theorem bsupr_limsup_dimH (s : Set X) : ⨆ x ∈ s, limsup dimH (𝓝[s] x).smallSets = dimH s := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun x _ => ?_) ?_
· refine limsup_le_of_le isCobounded_le_of_bot ?_
exact eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, fun t => dimH_mono⟩
· refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
rcases exists_mem_nhdsWithin_lt_dimH_of_lt_dimH hr with ⟨x, hxs, hxr⟩
refine le_iSup₂_of_le x hxs ?_; rw [limsup_eq]; refine le_sInf fun b hb => ?_
rcases eventually_smallSets.1 hb with ⟨t, htx, ht⟩
exact (hxr t htx).le.trans (ht t Subset.rfl)
/-- In an (extended) metric space with second countable topology, the Hausdorff dimension
of a set `s` is the supremum over all `x` of the limit superiors of `dimH t` along
`(𝓝[s] x).smallSets`. -/
theorem iSup_limsup_dimH (s : Set X) : ⨆ x, limsup dimH (𝓝[s] x).smallSets = dimH s := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun x => ?_) ?_
· refine limsup_le_of_le isCobounded_le_of_bot ?_
exact eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, fun t => dimH_mono⟩
· rw [← bsupr_limsup_dimH]; exact iSup₂_le_iSup _ _
end
/-!
### Hausdorff dimension and Hölder continuity
-/
variable {C K r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
/-- If `f` is a Hölder continuous map with exponent `r > 0`, then `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r`. -/
theorem HolderOnWith.dimH_image_le (h : HolderOnWith C r f s) (hr : 0 < r) :
dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r := by
borelize X Y
refine dimH_le fun d hd => ?_
have := h.hausdorffMeasure_image_le hr d.coe_nonneg
rw [hd, ← ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ d.coe_nonneg, top_le_iff] at this
have Hrd : μH[(r * d : ℝ≥0)] s = ⊤ := by
contrapose this
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top this
rw [ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le, mul_comm, ← ENNReal.coe_mul]
exacts [le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top Hrd, Or.inl (mt ENNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 hr.ne'),
Or.inl ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
namespace HolderWith
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous with a positive exponent `r`, then the Hausdorff dimension
of the image of a set `s` is at most `dimH s / r`. -/
theorem dimH_image_le (h : HolderWith C r f) (hr : 0 < r) (s : Set X) :
dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r :=
(h.holderOnWith s).dimH_image_le hr
/-- If `f` is a Hölder continuous map with exponent `r > 0`, then the Hausdorff dimension of its
range is at most the Hausdorff dimension of its domain divided by `r`. -/
theorem dimH_range_le (h : HolderWith C r f) (hr : 0 < r) :
dimH (range f) ≤ dimH (univ : Set X) / r :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ h.dimH_image_le hr univ
end HolderWith
/-- If `s` is a set in a space `X` with second countable topology and `f : X → Y` is Hölder
continuous in a neighborhood within `s` of every point `x ∈ s` with the same positive exponent `r`
but possibly different coefficients, then the Hausdorff dimension of the image `f '' s` is at most
the Hausdorff dimension of `s` divided by `r`. -/
theorem dimH_image_le_of_locally_holder_on [SecondCountableTopology X] {r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y}
(hr : 0 < r) {s : Set X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, HolderOnWith C r f t) :
dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s / r := by
choose! C t htn hC using hf
rcases countable_cover_nhdsWithin htn with ⟨u, hus, huc, huU⟩
replace huU := inter_eq_self_of_subset_left huU; rw [inter_iUnion₂] at huU
rw [← huU, image_iUnion₂, dimH_bUnion huc, dimH_bUnion huc]; simp only [ENNReal.iSup_div]
exact iSup₂_mono fun x hx => ((hC x (hus hx)).mono inter_subset_right).dimH_image_le hr
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Hölder continuous in a neighborhood of every point `x : X` with the same
positive exponent `r` but possibly different coefficients, then the Hausdorff dimension of the range
of `f` is at most the Hausdorff dimension of `X` divided by `r`. -/
theorem dimH_range_le_of_locally_holder_on [SecondCountableTopology X] {r : ℝ≥0} {f : X → Y}
(hr : 0 < r) (hf : ∀ x : X, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, HolderOnWith C r f s) :
dimH (range f) ≤ dimH (univ : Set X) / r := by
rw [← image_univ]
refine dimH_image_le_of_locally_holder_on hr fun x _ => ?_
simpa only [exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ] using hf x
/-!
### Hausdorff dimension and Lipschitz continuity
-/
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Lipschitz continuous on `s`, then `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.dimH_image_le (h : LipschitzOnWith K f s) : dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s := by
simpa using h.holderOnWith.dimH_image_le zero_lt_one
namespace LipschitzWith
/-- If `f` is a Lipschitz continuous map, then `dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s`. -/
theorem dimH_image_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set X) : dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s :=
h.lipschitzOnWith.dimH_image_le
/-- If `f` is a Lipschitz continuous map, then the Hausdorff dimension of its range is at most the
Hausdorff dimension of its domain. -/
theorem dimH_range_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) : dimH (range f) ≤ dimH (univ : Set X) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ h.dimH_image_le univ
end LipschitzWith
/-- If `s` is a set in an extended metric space `X` with second countable topology and `f : X → Y`
is Lipschitz in a neighborhood within `s` of every point `x ∈ s`, then the Hausdorff dimension of
the image `f '' s` is at most the Hausdorff dimension of `s`. -/
theorem dimH_image_le_of_locally_lipschitzOn [SecondCountableTopology X] {f : X → Y} {s : Set X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith C f t) : dimH (f '' s) ≤ dimH s := by
have : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, HolderOnWith C 1 f t := by
simpa only [holderOnWith_one] using hf
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_one, div_one] using dimH_image_le_of_locally_holder_on zero_lt_one this
/-- If `f : X → Y` is Lipschitz in a neighborhood of each point `x : X`, then the Hausdorff
dimension of `range f` is at most the Hausdorff dimension of `X`. -/
theorem dimH_range_le_of_locally_lipschitzOn [SecondCountableTopology X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : ∀ x : X, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith C f s) :
dimH (range f) ≤ dimH (univ : Set X) := by
rw [← image_univ]
refine dimH_image_le_of_locally_lipschitzOn fun x _ => ?_
simpa only [exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ] using hf x
namespace AntilipschitzWith
theorem dimH_preimage_le (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (s : Set Y) : dimH (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ dimH s := by
borelize X Y
refine dimH_le fun d hd => le_dimH_of_hausdorffMeasure_eq_top ?_
have := hf.hausdorffMeasure_preimage_le d.coe_nonneg s
rw [hd, top_le_iff] at this
contrapose! this
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top (by simp) this
theorem le_dimH_image (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (s : Set X) : dimH s ≤ dimH (f '' s) :=
calc
dimH s ≤ dimH (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := dimH_mono (subset_preimage_image _ _)
_ ≤ dimH (f '' s) := hf.dimH_preimage_le _
end AntilipschitzWith
/-!
### Isometries preserve Hausdorff dimension
-/
theorem Isometry.dimH_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set X) : dimH (f '' s) = dimH s :=
le_antisymm (hf.lipschitz.dimH_image_le _) (hf.antilipschitz.le_dimH_image _)
namespace IsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem dimH_image (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (s : Set X) : dimH (e '' s) = dimH s :=
e.isometry.dimH_image s
@[simp]
theorem dimH_preimage (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) (s : Set Y) : dimH (e ⁻¹' s) = dimH s := by
rw [← e.image_symm, e.symm.dimH_image]
|
theorem dimH_univ (e : X ≃ᵢ Y) : dimH (univ : Set X) = dimH (univ : Set Y) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDimension.lean | 386 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SModEq
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.BigOperators
/-!
# Power basis
This file defines a structure `PowerBasis R S`, giving a basis of the
`R`-algebra `S` as a finite list of powers `1, x, ..., x^n`.
For example, if `x` is algebraic over a ring/field, adjoining `x`
gives a `PowerBasis` structure generated by `x`.
## Definitions
* `PowerBasis R A`: a structure containing an `x` and an `n` such that
`1, x, ..., x^n` is a basis for the `R`-algebra `A` (viewed as an `R`-module).
* `finrank (hf : f ≠ 0) : Module.finrank K (AdjoinRoot f) = f.natDegree`,
the dimension of `AdjoinRoot f` equals the degree of `f`
* `PowerBasis.lift (pb : PowerBasis R S)`: if `y : S'` satisfies the same
equations as `pb.gen`, this is the map `S →ₐ[R] S'` sending `pb.gen` to `y`
* `PowerBasis.equiv`: if two power bases satisfy the same equations, they are
equivalent as algebras
## Implementation notes
Throughout this file, `R`, `S`, `A`, `B` ... are `CommRing`s, and `K`, `L`, ... are `Field`s.
`S` is an `R`-algebra, `B` is an `A`-algebra, `L` is a `K`-algebra.
## Tags
power basis, powerbasis
-/
open Polynomial Finsupp
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring S] [Algebra R S]
variable {A B : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- `pb : PowerBasis R S` states that `1, pb.gen, ..., pb.gen ^ (pb.dim - 1)`
is a basis for the `R`-algebra `S` (viewed as `R`-module).
This is a structure, not a class, since the same algebra can have many power bases.
For the common case where `S` is defined by adjoining an integral element to `R`,
the canonical power basis is given by `{Algebra,IntermediateField}.adjoin.powerBasis`.
-/
structure PowerBasis (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring S] [Algebra R S] where
gen : S
dim : ℕ
basis : Basis (Fin dim) R S
basis_eq_pow : ∀ (i), basis i = gen ^ (i : ℕ)
-- this is usually not needed because of `basis_eq_pow` but can be needed in some cases;
-- in such circumstances, add it manually using `@[simps dim gen basis]`.
initialize_simps_projections PowerBasis (-basis)
namespace PowerBasis
@[simp]
theorem coe_basis (pb : PowerBasis R S) : ⇑pb.basis = fun i : Fin pb.dim => pb.gen ^ (i : ℕ) :=
funext pb.basis_eq_pow
/-- Cannot be an instance because `PowerBasis` cannot be a class. -/
theorem finite (pb : PowerBasis R S) : Module.Finite R S := .of_basis pb.basis
theorem finrank [StrongRankCondition R] (pb : PowerBasis R S) :
Module.finrank R S = pb.dim := by
rw [Module.finrank_eq_card_basis pb.basis, Fintype.card_fin]
theorem mem_span_pow' {x y : S} {d : ℕ} :
y ∈ Submodule.span R (Set.range fun i : Fin d => x ^ (i : ℕ)) ↔
∃ f : R[X], f.degree < d ∧ y = aeval x f := by
have : (Set.range fun i : Fin d => x ^ (i : ℕ)) = (fun i : ℕ => x ^ i) '' ↑(Finset.range d) := by
ext n
simp_rw [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_range]
exact ⟨fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hy⟩ => ⟨i, hi, hy⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hy⟩ => ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hy⟩⟩
simp only [this, mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination, degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero, Finsupp.support,
exists_iff_exists_finsupp, coeff, aeval_def, eval₂RingHom', eval₂_eq_sum, Polynomial.sum,
mem_supported', linearCombination, Finsupp.sum, Algebra.smul_def, eval₂_zero, exists_prop,
LinearMap.id_coe, eval₂_one, id, not_lt, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_smulRight,
Finset.mem_range, AlgHom.coe_mks, Finset.mem_coe]
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ y]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem mem_span_pow {x y : S} {d : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) :
y ∈ Submodule.span R (Set.range fun i : Fin d => x ^ (i : ℕ)) ↔
∃ f : R[X], f.natDegree < d ∧ y = aeval x f := by
rw [mem_span_pow']
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨f, h, hy⟩
refine ⟨f, ?_, hy⟩
by_cases hf : f = 0
· simp only [hf, natDegree_zero, degree_zero] at h ⊢
first | exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le d) hd.symm | exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe d
simp_all only [degree_eq_natDegree hf]
· first | exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 h | exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 h
theorem dim_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis R S) : pb.dim ≠ 0 := fun h =>
not_nonempty_iff.mpr (h.symm ▸ Fin.isEmpty : IsEmpty (Fin pb.dim)) pb.basis.index_nonempty
theorem dim_pos [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis R S) : 0 < pb.dim :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pb.dim_ne_zero
theorem exists_eq_aeval [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis R S) (y : S) :
∃ f : R[X], f.natDegree < pb.dim ∧ y = aeval pb.gen f :=
(mem_span_pow pb.dim_ne_zero).mp (by simpa using pb.basis.mem_span y)
theorem exists_eq_aeval' (pb : PowerBasis R S) (y : S) : ∃ f : R[X], y = aeval pb.gen f := by
nontriviality S
obtain ⟨f, _, hf⟩ := exists_eq_aeval pb y
exact ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem algHom_ext {S' : Type*} [Semiring S'] [Algebra R S'] (pb : PowerBasis R S)
⦃f g : S →ₐ[R] S'⦄ (h : f pb.gen = g pb.gen) : f = g := by
ext x
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := pb.exists_eq_aeval' x
rw [← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply, ← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply, h]
open Ideal Finset Submodule in
theorem exists_smodEq (pb : PowerBasis A B) (b : B) :
∃ a, SModEq (Ideal.span ({pb.gen})) b (algebraMap A B a) := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial B
· exact ⟨0, by rw [SModEq, Subsingleton.eq_zero b, map_zero]⟩
refine ⟨pb.basis.repr b ⟨0, pb.dim_pos⟩, ?_⟩
have H := pb.basis.sum_repr b
rw [← insert_erase (mem_univ ⟨0, pb.dim_pos⟩), sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _)] at H
rw [SModEq, ← add_zero (algebraMap _ _ _), Quotient.mk_add]
nth_rewrite 1 [← H]
rw [Quotient.mk_add]
congr 1
· simp [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one ((pb.basis.repr b) _)]
· rw [Quotient.mk_zero, Quotient.mk_eq_zero, coe_basis]
refine sum_mem _ (fun i hi ↦ ?_)
rw [Algebra.smul_def']
refine Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ <| Ideal.pow_mem_of_mem _ (Ideal.subset_span (by simp)) _ <|
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| fun h ↦ not_mem_erase i univ <| Fin.eq_mk_iff_val_eq.2 h ▸ hi
open Submodule.Quotient in
theorem exists_gen_dvd_sub (pb : PowerBasis A B) (b : B) : ∃ a, pb.gen ∣ b - algebraMap A B a := by
simpa [← Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← mk_eq_zero, mk_sub, sub_eq_zero] using pb.exists_smodEq b
section minpoly
variable [Algebra A S]
/-- `pb.minpolyGen` is the minimal polynomial for `pb.gen`. -/
noncomputable def minpolyGen (pb : PowerBasis A S) : A[X] :=
X ^ pb.dim - ∑ i : Fin pb.dim, C (pb.basis.repr (pb.gen ^ pb.dim) i) * X ^ (i : ℕ)
theorem aeval_minpolyGen (pb : PowerBasis A S) : aeval pb.gen (minpolyGen pb) = 0 := by
simp_rw [minpolyGen, map_sub, map_sum, map_mul, map_pow, aeval_C, ← Algebra.smul_def, aeval_X]
refine sub_eq_zero.mpr ((pb.basis.linearCombination_repr (pb.gen ^ pb.dim)).symm.trans ?_)
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply, Finsupp.sum_fintype] <;>
simp only [pb.coe_basis, zero_smul, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
theorem minpolyGen_monic (pb : PowerBasis A S) : Monic (minpolyGen pb) := by
nontriviality A
apply (monic_X_pow _).sub_of_left _
rw [degree_X_pow]
exact degree_sum_fin_lt _
theorem dim_le_natDegree_of_root (pb : PowerBasis A S) {p : A[X]} (ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(root : aeval pb.gen p = 0) : pb.dim ≤ p.natDegree := by
refine le_of_not_lt fun hlt => ne_zero ?_
rw [p.as_sum_range' _ hlt, Finset.sum_range]
refine Fintype.sum_eq_zero _ fun i => ?_
simp_rw [aeval_eq_sum_range' hlt, Finset.sum_range, ← pb.basis_eq_pow] at root
have := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.1 pb.basis.linearIndependent _ root
rw [this, monomial_zero_right]
theorem dim_le_degree_of_root (h : PowerBasis A S) {p : A[X]} (ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(root : aeval h.gen p = 0) : ↑h.dim ≤ p.degree := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree ne_zero]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (h.dim_le_natDegree_of_root ne_zero root)
theorem degree_minpolyGen [Nontrivial A] (pb : PowerBasis A S) :
degree (minpolyGen pb) = pb.dim := by
unfold minpolyGen
rw [degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt] <;> rw [degree_X_pow]
apply degree_sum_fin_lt
theorem natDegree_minpolyGen [Nontrivial A] (pb : PowerBasis A S) :
natDegree (minpolyGen pb) = pb.dim :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some pb.degree_minpolyGen
@[simp]
theorem minpolyGen_eq (pb : PowerBasis A S) : pb.minpolyGen = minpoly A pb.gen := by
nontriviality A
refine minpoly.unique' A _ pb.minpolyGen_monic pb.aeval_minpolyGen fun q hq =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hn0 h0 => ?_
exact (pb.dim_le_degree_of_root hn0 h0).not_lt (pb.degree_minpolyGen ▸ hq)
theorem isIntegral_gen (pb : PowerBasis A S) : IsIntegral A pb.gen :=
⟨minpolyGen pb, minpolyGen_monic pb, aeval_minpolyGen pb⟩
@[simp]
theorem degree_minpoly [Nontrivial A] (pb : PowerBasis A S) :
degree (minpoly A pb.gen) = pb.dim := by rw [← minpolyGen_eq, degree_minpolyGen]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_minpoly [Nontrivial A] (pb : PowerBasis A S) :
(minpoly A pb.gen).natDegree = pb.dim := by rw [← minpolyGen_eq, natDegree_minpolyGen]
protected theorem leftMulMatrix (pb : PowerBasis A S) : Algebra.leftMulMatrix pb.basis pb.gen =
@Matrix.of (Fin pb.dim) (Fin pb.dim) _ fun i j =>
if ↑j + 1 = pb.dim then -pb.minpolyGen.coeff ↑i else if (i : ℕ) = j + 1 then 1 else 0 := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial A; · subsingleton
rw [Algebra.leftMulMatrix_apply, ← LinearEquiv.eq_symm_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_symm]
| refine pb.basis.ext fun k => ?_
simp_rw [Matrix.toLin_self, Matrix.of_apply, pb.basis_eq_pow]
apply (pow_succ' _ _).symm.trans
split_ifs with h
· simp_rw [h, neg_smul, Finset.sum_neg_distrib, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
convert pb.aeval_minpolyGen
rw [add_comm, aeval_eq_sum_range, Finset.sum_range_succ, ← leadingCoeff,
pb.minpolyGen_monic.leadingCoeff, one_smul, natDegree_minpolyGen, Finset.sum_range]
· rw [Fintype.sum_eq_single (⟨(k : ℕ) + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne k.2 h⟩ : Fin pb.dim), if_pos, one_smul]
· rfl
intro x hx
rw [if_neg, zero_smul]
apply mt Fin.ext hx
end minpoly
section Equiv
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerBasis.lean | 220 | 237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AddGroupWithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
/-!
# Definition and basic properties of extended natural numbers
In this file we define `ENat` (notation: `ℕ∞`) to be `WithTop ℕ` and prove some basic lemmas
about this type.
## Implementation details
There are two natural coercions from `ℕ` to `WithTop ℕ = ENat`: `WithTop.some` and `Nat.cast`. In
Lean 3, this difference was hidden in typeclass instances. Since these instances were definitionally
equal, we did not duplicate generic lemmas about `WithTop α` and `WithTop.some` coercion for `ENat`
and `Nat.cast` coercion. If you need to apply a lemma about `WithTop`, you may either rewrite back
and forth using `ENat.some_eq_coe`, or restate the lemma for `ENat`.
## TODO
Unify `ENat.add_iSup`/`ENat.iSup_add` with `ENNReal.add_iSup`/`ENNReal.iSup_add`. The key property
of `ENat` and `ENNReal` we are using is that all `a` are either absorbing for addition (`a + b = a`
for all `b`), or that it's order-cancellable (`a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c` for all `b`, `c`), and
similarly for multiplication.
-/
open Function
assert_not_exists Field
deriving instance Zero, CommSemiring, Nontrivial,
LinearOrder, Bot, Sub,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop, WellFoundedRelation
for ENat
-- The `CanonicallyOrderedAdd, OrderBot, OrderTop, OrderedSub, SuccOrder, WellFoundedLT, CharZero`
-- instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
-- In `Mathlib.Data.Nat.PartENat` proofs timed out when we included `deriving AddCommMonoidWithOne`,
-- and it seems to work without.
namespace ENat
instance : IsOrderedRing ℕ∞ := WithTop.instIsOrderedRing
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd ℕ∞ := WithTop.canonicallyOrderedAdd
instance : OrderBot ℕ∞ := WithTop.orderBot
instance : OrderTop ℕ∞ := WithTop.orderTop
instance : OrderedSub ℕ∞ := inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (WithTop ℕ))
instance : SuccOrder ℕ∞ := inferInstanceAs (SuccOrder (WithTop ℕ))
instance : WellFoundedLT ℕ∞ := inferInstanceAs (WellFoundedLT (WithTop ℕ))
instance : CharZero ℕ∞ := inferInstanceAs (CharZero (WithTop ℕ))
variable {a b c m n : ℕ∞}
/-- Lemmas about `WithTop` expect (and can output) `WithTop.some` but the normal form for coercion
`ℕ → ℕ∞` is `Nat.cast`. -/
@[simp] theorem some_eq_coe : (WithTop.some : ℕ → ℕ∞) = Nat.cast := rfl
theorem coe_inj {a b : ℕ} : (a : ℕ∞) = b ↔ a = b := WithTop.coe_inj
instance : SuccAddOrder ℕ∞ where
succ_eq_add_one x := by cases x <;> simp [SuccOrder.succ]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : ℕ∞) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℕ) : ℕ∞) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem coe_add (m n : ℕ) : ↑(m + n) = (m + n : ℕ∞) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m n : ℕ) : ↑(m - n) = (m - n : ℕ∞) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (m n : ℕ) : ↑(m * n) = (m * n : ℕ∞) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_top (hm : m ≠ 0) : m * ⊤ = ⊤ := WithTop.mul_top hm
@[simp] theorem top_mul (hm : m ≠ 0) : ⊤ * m = ⊤ := WithTop.top_mul hm
/-- A version of `mul_top` where the RHS is stated as an `ite` -/
theorem mul_top' : m * ⊤ = if m = 0 then 0 else ⊤ := WithTop.mul_top' m
/-- A version of `top_mul` where the RHS is stated as an `ite` -/
theorem top_mul' : ⊤ * m = if m = 0 then 0 else ⊤ := WithTop.top_mul' m
@[simp] lemma top_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (⊤ : ℕ∞) ^ n = ⊤ := WithTop.top_pow hn
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_top_iff {n : ℕ} : a ^ n = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∧ n ≠ 0 := WithTop.pow_eq_top_iff
lemma pow_ne_top_iff {n : ℕ} : a ^ n ≠ ⊤ ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∨ n = 0 := WithTop.pow_ne_top_iff
@[simp] lemma pow_lt_top_iff {n : ℕ} : a ^ n < ⊤ ↔ a < ⊤ ∨ n = 0 := WithTop.pow_lt_top_iff
lemma eq_top_of_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = ⊤) : a = ⊤ := WithTop.eq_top_of_pow n ha
/-- Convert a `ℕ∞` to a `ℕ` using a proof that it is not infinite. -/
def lift (x : ℕ∞) (h : x < ⊤) : ℕ := WithTop.untop x (WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp h)
@[simp] theorem coe_lift (x : ℕ∞) (h : x < ⊤) : (lift x h : ℕ∞) = x :=
WithTop.coe_untop x (WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp h)
@[simp] theorem lift_coe (n : ℕ) : lift (n : ℕ∞) (WithTop.coe_lt_top n) = n := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_lt_iff {x : ℕ∞} {h} {n : ℕ} : lift x h < n ↔ x < n := WithTop.untop_lt_iff _
@[simp] theorem lift_le_iff {x : ℕ∞} {h} {n : ℕ} : lift x h ≤ n ↔ x ≤ n := WithTop.untop_le_iff _
@[simp] theorem lt_lift_iff {x : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} {h} : x < lift n h ↔ x < n := WithTop.lt_untop_iff _
@[simp] theorem le_lift_iff {x : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} {h} : x ≤ lift n h ↔ x ≤ n := WithTop.le_untop_iff _
@[simp] theorem lift_zero : lift 0 (WithTop.coe_lt_top 0) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_one : lift 1 (WithTop.coe_lt_top 1) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift ofNat(n) (WithTop.coe_lt_top n) = OfNat.ofNat n := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_lt_top {a b : ℕ∞} : a + b < ⊤ ↔ a < ⊤ ∧ b < ⊤ := WithTop.add_lt_top
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b : ℕ∞) (h : a + b < ⊤) :
lift (a + b) h = lift a (add_lt_top.1 h).1 + lift b (add_lt_top.1 h).2 := by
apply coe_inj.1
simp
instance canLift : CanLift ℕ∞ ℕ (↑) (· ≠ ⊤) := WithTop.canLift
instance : WellFoundedRelation ℕ∞ where
rel := (· < ·)
wf := IsWellFounded.wf
/-- Conversion of `ℕ∞` to `ℕ` sending `∞` to `0`. -/
def toNat : ℕ∞ → ℕ := WithTop.untopD 0
/-- Homomorphism from `ℕ∞` to `ℕ` sending `∞` to `0`. -/
def toNatHom : MonoidWithZeroHom ℕ∞ ℕ where
toFun := toNat
map_one' := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_mul' := WithTop.untopD_zero_mul
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_toNatHom : toNatHom = toNat := rfl
lemma toNatHom_apply (n : ℕ) : toNatHom n = toNat n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_coe (n : ℕ) : toNat n = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_zero : toNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_one : toNat 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : toNat ofNat(n) = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_top : toNat ⊤ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_zero : toNat n = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = ⊤ := WithTop.untopD_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem recTopCoe_zero {C : ℕ∞ → Sort*} (d : C ⊤) (f : ∀ a : ℕ, C a) : @recTopCoe C d f 0 = f 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem recTopCoe_one {C : ℕ∞ → Sort*} (d : C ⊤) (f : ∀ a : ℕ, C a) : @recTopCoe C d f 1 = f 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem recTopCoe_ofNat {C : ℕ∞ → Sort*} (d : C ⊤) (f : ∀ a : ℕ, C a) (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] :
@recTopCoe C d f ofNat(x) = f (OfNat.ofNat x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_ne_coe (a : ℕ) : ⊤ ≠ (a : ℕ∞) :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem top_ne_ofNat (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : ⊤ ≠ (ofNat(a) : ℕ∞) :=
nofun
@[simp] lemma top_ne_zero : (⊤ : ℕ∞) ≠ 0 := nofun
@[simp] lemma top_ne_one : (⊤ : ℕ∞) ≠ 1 := nofun
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_top (a : ℕ) : (a : ℕ∞) ≠ ⊤ :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ℕ∞) ≠ ⊤ :=
nofun
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_top : 0 ≠ (⊤ : ℕ∞) := nofun
@[simp] lemma one_ne_top : 1 ≠ (⊤ : ℕ∞) := nofun
@[simp]
theorem top_sub_coe (a : ℕ) : (⊤ : ℕ∞) - a = ⊤ :=
WithTop.top_sub_coe
@[simp]
theorem top_sub_one : (⊤ : ℕ∞) - 1 = ⊤ :=
top_sub_coe 1
@[simp]
theorem top_sub_ofNat (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (⊤ : ℕ∞) - ofNat(a) = ⊤ :=
top_sub_coe a
@[simp]
theorem top_pos : (0 : ℕ∞) < ⊤ :=
| WithTop.top_pos
@[deprecated ENat.top_pos (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias zero_lt_top := top_pos
| Mathlib/Data/ENat/Basic.lean | 220 | 223 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`MonoidHom` (resp., `AddMonoidHom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
This file also defines the lesser-used (and notation-less) homomorphism types which are used as
building blocks for other homomorphisms:
* `ZeroHom`
* `OneHom`
* `AddHom`
* `MulHom`
## Notations
* `→+`: Bundled `AddMonoid` homs. Also use for `AddGroup` homs.
* `→*`: Bundled `Monoid` homs. Also use for `Group` homs.
* `→ₙ+`: Bundled `AddSemigroup` homs.
* `→ₙ*`: Bundled `Semigroup` homs.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `GroupHom` -- the idea is that `MonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `MonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `MonoidHom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `MonoidHom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `Deprecated/Group`.
## Tags
MonoidHom, AddMonoidHom
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β M N P : Type*}
-- monoids
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
-- groups
variable {F : Type*}
-- homs
section Zero
/-- `ZeroHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve zero.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ZeroHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [ZeroHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `ZeroHomClass`.
-/
structure ZeroHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
protected map_zero' : toFun 0 = 0
/-- `ZeroHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of zero-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `ZeroHom`.
-/
class ZeroHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] [FunLike F M N] :
Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
map_zero : ∀ f : F, f 0 = 0
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Zero
section Add
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve addition. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `AddHom` is a non-unital additive monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : AddHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddHomClass`.
-/
structure AddHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Add M] [Add N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
protected map_add' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` denotes the type of addition-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ+ " => AddHom
/-- `AddHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `AddHom`.
-/
class AddHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Add M] [Add N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
map_add : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Add
section add_zero
/-- `M →+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `AddZeroClass` structure.
`AddMonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →+ N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddMonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddMonoidHomClass`.
-/
structure AddMonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] extends
ZeroHom M N, AddHom M N
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `M →+ N` denotes the type of additive monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →+ " => AddMonoidHom
/-- `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `AddZeroClass`-preserving
homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `AddMonoidHom`.
-/
class AddMonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*)
[AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M N, ZeroHomClass F M N
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end add_zero
section One
variable [One M] [One N]
/-- `OneHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve one.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : OneHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `OneHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure OneHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [One M] [One N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
protected map_one' : toFun 1 = 1
/-- `OneHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of one-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `OneHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class OneHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [One M] [One N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
map_one : ∀ f : F, f 1 = 1
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.funLike : FunLike (OneHom M N) M N where
coe := OneHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.oneHomClass : OneHomClass (OneHom M N) M N where
map_one := OneHom.map_one'
library_note "low priority simp lemmas"
/--
The hom class hierarchy allows for a single lemma, such as `map_one`, to apply to a large variety
of morphism types, so long as they have an instance of `OneHomClass`. For example, this applies to
to `MonoidHom`, `RingHom`, `AlgHom`, `StarAlgHom`, as well as their `Equiv` variants, etc. However,
precisely because these lemmas are so widely applicable, they keys in the `simp` discrimination tree
are necessarily highly non-specific. For example, the key for `map_one` is
`@DFunLike.coe _ _ _ _ _ 1`.
Consequently, whenever lean sees `⇑f 1`, for some `f : F`, it will attempt to synthesize a
`OneHomClass F ?A ?B` instance. If no such instance exists, then Lean will need to traverse (almost)
the entirety of the `FunLike` hierarchy in order to determine this because so many classes have a
`OneHomClass` instance (in fact, this problem is likely worse for `ZeroHomClass`). This can lead to
a significant performance hit when `map_one` fails to apply.
To avoid this problem, we mark these widely applicable simp lemmas with key discimination tree keys
with `low` priority in order to ensure that they are not tried first.
-/
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f 1 = 1 :=
OneHomClass.map_one f
@[to_additive] lemma map_comp_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f ∘ (1 : ι → M) = 1 := by simp
/-- In principle this could be an instance, but in practice it causes performance issues. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem Subsingleton.of_oneHomClass [Subsingleton M] [OneHomClass F M N] :
Subsingleton F where
allEq f g := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (OneHom M N) := .of_oneHomClass
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_one_iff [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f)
{x : M} :
f x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := hf.eq_iff' (map_one f)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_ne_one_iff {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} : f x ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 := (map_eq_one_iff f hf).not
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_map {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S]
{f : F} {x : R} (hx : f x ≠ 1) : x ≠ 1 := ne_of_apply_ne f <| (by rwa [(map_one f)])
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OneHomClass F M N` into an actual
`OneHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `OneHom M N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `ZeroHomClass F M N` into an actual
`ZeroHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `ZeroHom M N`."]
def OneHomClass.toOneHom [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : OneHom M N where
toFun := f
map_one' := map_one f
/-- Any type satisfying `OneHomClass` can be cast into `OneHom` via `OneHomClass.toOneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `ZeroHomClass` can be cast into `ZeroHom` via
`ZeroHomClass.toZeroHom`. "]
instance [OneHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (OneHom M N) :=
⟨OneHomClass.toOneHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_coe [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) :
((f : OneHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end One
section Mul
variable [Mul M] [Mul N]
/-- `M →ₙ* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve multiplication. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `MulHom` is a non-unital monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →ₙ* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MulHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MulHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
protected map_mul' : ∀ x y, toFun (x * y) = toFun x * toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ* N` denotes the type of multiplication-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ* " => MulHom
/-- `MulHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `MulHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class MulHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
map_mul : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y
@[to_additive]
instance MulHom.funLike : FunLike (M →ₙ* N) M N where
coe := MulHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
/-- `MulHom` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms -/
@[to_additive "`AddHom` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms"]
instance MulHom.mulHomClass : MulHomClass (M →ₙ* N) M N where
map_mul := MulHom.map_mul'
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (x y : M) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
MulHomClass.map_mul f x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (g h : ι → M) : f ∘ (g * h) = f ∘ g * f ∘ h := by
ext; simp
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MulHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddHomClass F M N` into an actual
`AddHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ+ N`."]
def MulHomClass.toMulHom [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul f
/-- Any type satisfying `MulHomClass` can be cast into `MulHom` via `MulHomClass.toMulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddHomClass` can be cast into `AddHom` via
`AddHomClass.toAddHom`."]
instance [MulHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →ₙ* N) :=
⟨MulHomClass.toMulHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_coe [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : MulHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end Mul
section mul_one
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
/-- `M →* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `Monoid` structure.
`MonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MonoidHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] extends
OneHom M N, M →ₙ* N
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toOneHom
/-- `M →* N` denotes the type of monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →* " => MonoidHom
/-- `MonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `Monoid`-preserving homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
[FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends MulHomClass F M N, OneHomClass F M N
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instFunLike : FunLike (M →* N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
apply DFunLike.coe_injective'
exact h
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (M →* N) M N where
map_mul := MonoidHom.map_mul'
map_one f := f.toOneHom.map_one'
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (M →* N) := .of_oneHomClass
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MonoidHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` into an
actual `MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →+ N`."]
def MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →* N :=
{ (f : M →ₙ* N), (f : OneHom M N) with }
/-- Any type satisfying `MonoidHomClass` can be cast into `MonoidHom` via
`MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `AddMonoidHom` via
`AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom`."]
instance [MonoidHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →* N) :=
⟨MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_coe [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : M →* N) : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_eq_one [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) :
f a * f b = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul, h, map_one]
variable [FunLike F G H]
@[to_additive]
theorem map_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (a b : G) : f (a / b) = f a / f b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, hf]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (g h : ι → G) : f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by
ext; simp [map_div' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve inverse.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve negation."]
theorem map_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (a : G) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| map_mul_eq_one f <| inv_mul_cancel _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) :
f ∘ g⁻¹ = (f ∘ g)⁻¹ := by ext; simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a b : G) :
f (a * b⁻¹) = f a * (f b)⁻¹ := by rw [map_mul, map_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g * h⁻¹) = f ∘ g * (f ∘ h)⁻¹ := by simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
∀ a b, f (a / b) = f a / f b := map_div' _ <| map_inv f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by ext; simp
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)]
theorem map_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a : G) :
∀ n : ℕ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, map_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, map_mul, map_pow f a n]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) (n : ℕ) :
f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, map_pow, zpow_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, hf, map_pow, ← zpow_negSucc]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (g : ι → G) (n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by
| ext; simp [map_zpow' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve integer power.
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/Defs.lean | 473 | 476 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Rotate
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
/-!
# Permutations of `Fin n`
-/
assert_not_exists LinearMap
open Equiv
/-- Permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` are equivalent to fixing a single
`Fin (n + 1)` and permuting the remaining with a `Perm (Fin n)`.
The fixed `Fin (n + 1)` is swapped with `0`. -/
def Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin {n : ℕ} : Perm (Fin n.succ) ≃ Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n) :=
((Equiv.permCongr <| finSuccEquiv n).trans Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption).trans
(Equiv.prodCongr (finSuccEquiv n).symm (Equiv.refl _))
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, Equiv.refl _) = swap 0 p := by
simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Equiv.permCongr_def]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, 1) = swap 0 p :=
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl p
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 0 = p := by simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin n)) (p : Fin (n + 1))
(x : Fin n) : Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) x.succ = swap 0 p (e x).succ := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p
· simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· intro i
by_cases h : i = e x
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map, swap_apply_def, Ne.symm h]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin (n + 1))) (p : Fin (n + 2)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 1 = swap 0 p (e 0).succ := by
rw [← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ e p 0]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Perm.sign (Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e)) = ite (p = 0) 1 (-1) * Perm.sign e := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p <;> simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin]
/-- The set of all permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` can be constructed by augmenting the set of
permutations of `Fin n` by each element of `Fin (n + 1)` in turn. -/
theorem Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ {n : ℕ} :
@Finset.univ (Perm <| Fin n.succ) _ =
(Finset.univ : Finset <| Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n)).map
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm.toEmbedding :=
(Finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding _).symm
section CycleRange
/-! ### `cycleRange` section
Define the permutations `Fin.cycleRange i`, the cycle `(0 1 2 ... i)`.
-/
open Equiv.Perm
theorem finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin {n : ℕ} :
finRotate n.succ = decomposeFin.symm (1, finRotate n) := by
ext i
cases n; · simp
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· simp
rw [coe_finRotate, decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ, if_congr i.succ_eq_last_succ rfl rfl]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [Fin.val_succ, Function.Injective.map_swap Fin.val_injective, Fin.val_succ, coe_finRotate,
if_neg h, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) (Nat.succ_succ_ne_one _)]
@[simp]
theorem sign_finRotate (n : ℕ) : Perm.sign (finRotate (n + 1)) = (-1) ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin]
simp [ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem support_finRotate {n : ℕ} : support (finRotate (n + 2)) = Finset.univ := by
ext
simp
theorem support_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : support (finRotate n) = Finset.univ := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, support_finRotate]
theorem isCycle_finRotate {n : ℕ} : IsCycle (finRotate (n + 2)) := by
refine ⟨0, by simp, fun x hx' => ⟨x, ?_⟩⟩
clear hx'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
rw [zpow_natCast, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_mk]
induction' x with x ih; · rfl
rw [pow_succ', Perm.mul_apply, coe_finRotate_of_ne_last, ih (lt_trans x.lt_succ_self hx)]
rw [Ne, Fin.ext_iff, ih (lt_trans x.lt_succ_self hx), Fin.val_last]
exact ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hx)
theorem isCycle_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : IsCycle (finRotate n) := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm]
exact isCycle_finRotate
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_finRotate {n : ℕ} : cycleType (finRotate (n + 2)) = {n + 2} := by
rw [isCycle_finRotate.cycleType, support_finRotate, ← Fintype.card, Fintype.card_fin]
theorem cycleType_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : cycleType (finRotate n) = {n} := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, cycleType_finRotate]
namespace Fin
/-- `Fin.cycleRange i` is the cycle `(0 1 2 ... i)` leaving `(i+1 ... (n-1))` unchanged. -/
def cycleRange {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : Perm (Fin n) :=
(finRotate (i + 1)).extendDomain
(Equiv.ofLeftInverse' (Fin.castLEEmb (Nat.succ_le_of_lt i.is_lt)) (↑)
(by
intro x
ext
simp))
theorem cycleRange_of_gt {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n} (h : i < j) : cycleRange i j = j := by
rw [cycleRange, ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective,
← Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_eq_ofInjective, ← viaFintypeEmbedding,
viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_not_mem_range]
simpa
theorem cycleRange_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {i j : Fin n} (h : j ≤ i) :
cycleRange i j = if j = i then 0 else j + 1 := by
cases n
· subsingleton
have : j = (Fin.castLE (Nat.succ_le_of_lt i.is_lt))
⟨j, lt_of_le_of_lt h (Nat.lt_succ_self i)⟩ := by simp
ext
rw [this, cycleRange, ofLeftInverse'_eq_ofInjective, ←
Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_eq_ofInjective, ← viaFintypeEmbedding, ← coe_castLEEmb,
viaFintypeEmbedding_apply_image, coe_castLEEmb, coe_castLE, coe_finRotate]
simp only [Fin.ext_iff, val_last, val_mk, val_zero, Fin.eta, castLE_mk]
split_ifs with heq
· rfl
· rw [Fin.val_add_one_of_lt]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_ne h (mt (congr_arg _) heq)) (le_last i)
theorem coe_cycleRange_of_le {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n} (h : j ≤ i) :
(cycleRange i j : ℕ) = if j = i then 0 else (j : ℕ) + 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact absurd le_rfl i.pos.not_le
rw [cycleRange_of_le h]
split_ifs with h'
· rfl
exact
val_add_one_of_lt
(calc
(j : ℕ) < i := Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val.mp (lt_of_le_of_ne h h')
_ ≤ n := Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp i.2)
theorem cycleRange_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {i j : Fin n} (h : j < i) : cycleRange i j = j + 1 := by
rw [cycleRange_of_le h.le, if_neg h.ne]
theorem coe_cycleRange_of_lt {n : ℕ} {i j : Fin n} (h : j < i) :
(cycleRange i j : ℕ) = j + 1 := by rw [coe_cycleRange_of_le h.le, if_neg h.ne]
theorem cycleRange_of_eq {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {i j : Fin n} (h : j = i) : cycleRange i j = 0 := by
rw [cycleRange_of_le h.le, if_pos h]
@[simp]
theorem cycleRange_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : cycleRange i i = 0 :=
cycleRange_of_eq rfl
theorem cycleRange_apply {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i j : Fin n) :
cycleRange i j = if j < i then j + 1 else if j = i then 0 else j := by
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· exact cycleRange_of_lt h₁
· exact cycleRange_of_eq h₂
· exact cycleRange_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_gt h₁) (Ne.symm h₂))
@[simp]
theorem cycleRange_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : cycleRange (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
ext j
rcases (Fin.zero_le' j).eq_or_lt with rfl | hj
· simp
· rw [cycleRange_of_gt hj, one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem cycleRange_last (n : ℕ) : cycleRange (last n) = finRotate (n + 1) := by
ext i
rw [coe_cycleRange_of_le (le_last _), coe_finRotate]
@[simp]
theorem cycleRange_mk_zero {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : cycleRange ⟨0, h⟩ = 1 :=
have : NeZero n := .of_pos h
cycleRange_zero n
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")]
alias cycleRange_zero' := cycleRange_mk_zero
@[simp]
theorem sign_cycleRange {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : Perm.sign (cycleRange i) = (-1) ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp [cycleRange]
@[simp]
theorem succAbove_cycleRange {n : ℕ} (i j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove (i.cycleRange j) = swap 0 i.succ j.succ := by
cases n
· rcases j with ⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy j i with (hlt | heq | hgt)
· have : castSucc (j + 1) = j.succ := by
ext
rw [coe_castSucc, val_succ, Fin.val_add_one_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hlt i.le_last)]
rw [Fin.cycleRange_of_lt hlt, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, this, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· apply Fin.succ_ne_zero
· exact (Fin.succ_injective _).ne hlt.ne
· rw [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val]
simpa [this] using hlt
· rw [heq, Fin.cycleRange_self, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, swap_apply_right, Fin.castSucc_zero]
· rw [Fin.castSucc_zero]
apply Fin.succ_pos
· rw [Fin.cycleRange_of_gt hgt, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· apply Fin.succ_ne_zero
· apply (Fin.succ_injective _).ne hgt.ne.symm
· simpa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val] using hgt
@[simp]
theorem cycleRange_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
| i.cycleRange (i.succAbove j) = j.succ := by
rcases lt_or_ge (castSucc j) i with h | h
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, Fin.cycleRange_of_lt h, Fin.coeSucc_eq_succ]
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, Fin.cycleRange_of_gt (Fin.le_castSucc_iff.mp h)]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Fin.lean | 245 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deligne
/-!
# Dirichlet series as Mellin transforms
Here we prove general results of the form "the Mellin transform of a power series in exp (-t) is
a Dirichlet series".
-/
open Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open Complex
variable {ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
/-- Most basic version of the "Mellin transform = Dirichlet series" argument. -/
lemma hasSum_mellin {a : ι → ℂ} {p : ι → ℝ} {F : ℝ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hp : ∀ i, a i = 0 ∨ 0 < p i) (hs : 0 < s.re)
(hF : ∀ t ∈ Ioi 0, HasSum (fun i ↦ a i * rexp (-p i * t)) (F t))
(h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖a i‖ / (p i) ^ s.re) :
HasSum (fun i ↦ Gamma s * a i / p i ^ s) (mellin F s) := by
simp_rw [mellin, smul_eq_mul, ← setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi
(fun t ht ↦ congr_arg _ (hF t ht).tsum_eq), ← tsum_mul_left]
convert hasSum_integral_of_summable_integral_norm
(F := fun i t ↦ t ^ (s - 1) * (a i * rexp (-p i * t))) (fun i ↦ ?_) ?_ using 2 with i
· simp_rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (a _), mul_assoc (a _), mul_div_assoc, integral_const_mul]
rcases hp i with hai | hpi
· rw [hai, zero_mul, zero_mul]
have := integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi hs hpi
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul, ← ofReal_neg, ← ofReal_exp, ← neg_mul (p i)] at this
rw [this, one_div, inv_cpow _ _ (arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hpi.le ▸ pi_pos.ne), div_eq_inv_mul]
· -- integrability of terms
rcases hp i with hai | hpi
· simp [hai]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (a i), mul_assoc]
have := Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent hs
rw [← mul_zero (p i), ← integrableOn_Ioi_comp_mul_left_iff _ _ hpi] at this
refine (IntegrableOn.congr_fun (this.const_mul (1 / p i ^ (s - 1)))
(fun t (ht : 0 < t) ↦ ?_) measurableSet_Ioi).const_mul _
simp_rw [mul_comm (↑(rexp _) : ℂ), ← mul_assoc, neg_mul, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hpi.le ht.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, inv_mul_cancel₀, one_mul]
rw [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hpi.ne')
· -- summability of integrals of norms
apply Summable.of_norm
convert h_sum.mul_left (Real.Gamma s.re) using 2 with i
simp_rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (a i), mul_assoc, norm_mul (a i), integral_const_mul]
rw [← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm (Real.Gamma _), mul_div_assoc, norm_mul ‖a i‖, norm_norm]
rcases hp i with hai | hpi
· simp [hai]
congr 1
have := Real.integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi hs hpi
simp_rw [← neg_mul (p i), one_div, inv_rpow hpi.le, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at this
rw [norm_of_nonneg (integral_nonneg (fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _)), ← this]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
rw [norm_mul, norm_real, Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.abs_exp,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos ht, sub_re, one_re]
/-- Shortcut version for the commonly arising special case when `p i = π * q i` for some other
sequence `q`. -/
lemma hasSum_mellin_pi_mul {a : ι → ℂ} {q : ι → ℝ} {F : ℝ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hq : ∀ i, a i = 0 ∨ 0 < q i) (hs : 0 < s.re)
(hF : ∀ t ∈ Ioi 0, HasSum (fun i ↦ a i * rexp (-π * q i * t)) (F t))
(h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖a i‖ / (q i) ^ s.re) :
HasSum (fun i ↦ π ^ (-s) * Gamma s * a i / q i ^ s) (mellin F s) := by
have hp i : a i = 0 ∨ 0 < π * q i := by rcases hq i with h | h <;> simp [h, pi_pos]
convert hasSum_mellin hp hs (by simpa using hF) ?_ using 2 with i
· have : a i / ↑(π * q i) ^ s = π ^ (-s) * a i / q i ^ s := by
rcases hq i with h | h
· simp [h]
· rw [ofReal_mul, mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg pi_pos.le h.le, ← div_div, cpow_neg,
← div_eq_inv_mul]
simp_rw [mul_div_assoc, this]
ring_nf
· have (i) : ‖a i‖ / ↑(π * q i) ^ s.re = π ^ (-s.re) * ‖a i‖ / q i ^ s.re := by
rcases hq i with h | h
· simp [h]
· rw [mul_rpow pi_pos.le h.le, ← div_div, rpow_neg pi_pos.le, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
simpa only [this, mul_div_assoc] using h_sum.mul_left _
/-- Version allowing some constant terms (which are omitted from the sums). -/
lemma hasSum_mellin_pi_mul₀ {a : ι → ℂ} {p : ι → ℝ} {F : ℝ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hp : ∀ i, 0 ≤ p i) (hs : 0 < s.re)
(hF : ∀ t ∈ Ioi 0, HasSum (fun i ↦ if p i = 0 then 0 else a i * rexp (-π * p i * t)) (F t))
(h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖a i‖ / (p i) ^ s.re) :
HasSum (fun i ↦ π ^ (-s) * Gamma s * a i / p i ^ s) (mellin F s) := by
have hs' : s ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (zero_re ▸ h ▸ hs)
let a' i := if p i = 0 then 0 else a i
have hp' i : a' i = 0 ∨ 0 < p i := by
simp only [a']
split_ifs with h <;> try tauto
exact Or.inr (lt_of_le_of_ne (hp i) (Ne.symm h))
have (i t) : (if p i = 0 then 0 else a i * rexp (-π * p i * t)) =
a' i * rexp (-π * p i * t) := by
simp [a']
simp_rw [this] at hF
convert hasSum_mellin_pi_mul hp' hs hF ?_ using 2 with i
· rcases eq_or_ne (p i) 0 with h | h <;>
simp [a', h, if_false, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow hs', div_zero]
· refine h_sum.of_norm_bounded _ (fun i ↦ ?_)
simp only [a']
split_ifs
· simp only [norm_zero, zero_div]
positivity
· have := hp i
rw [norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
| /-- Tailored version for even Jacobi theta functions. -/
lemma hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq {a : ι → ℂ} {r : ι → ℝ} {F : ℝ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re)
(hF : ∀ t ∈ Ioi 0, HasSum (fun i ↦ if r i = 0 then 0 else a i * rexp (-π * r i ^ 2 * t)) (F t))
(h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖a i‖ / |r i| ^ s.re) :
HasSum (fun i ↦ Gammaℝ s * a i / |r i| ^ s) (mellin F (s / 2)) := by
have hs' : 0 < (s / 2).re := by rw [div_ofNat_re]; positivity
simp_rw [← sq_eq_zero_iff (a := r _)] at hF
convert hasSum_mellin_pi_mul₀ (fun i ↦ sq_nonneg (r i)) hs' hF ?_ using 3 with i
· rw [← neg_div, Gammaℝ_def]
· rw [← sq_abs, ofReal_pow, ← cpow_nat_mul']
· ring_nf
all_goals rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg _)]; linarith [pi_pos]
· convert h_sum using 3 with i
rw [← sq_abs, ← rpow_natCast_mul (abs_nonneg _), div_ofNat_re, Nat.cast_ofNat,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_pos.ne']
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/MellinEqDirichlet.lean | 112 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
obtain ⟨b', h'⟩ := Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h))
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
theorem dlookup_map (l : List (Sigma β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (g : ∀ a, β a → β' (f a)) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, g _ x.2⟩).dlookup (f a) = (l.dlookup a).map (g a) := by
induction' l with b l IH
· rw [map_nil, dlookup_nil, dlookup_nil, Option.map_none']
· rw [map_cons]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a b.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.map_some']
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ h, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ (fun he => h <| hf he), IH]
theorem dlookup_map₁ {β : Type v} (l : List (Σ _ : α, β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, x.2⟩ : List (Σ _ : α', β)).dlookup (f a) = l.dlookup a := by
rw [dlookup_map (β' := fun _ => β) l hf (fun _ x => x) a, Option.map_id']
theorem dlookup_map₂ {γ δ : α → Type*} {l : List (Σ a, γ a)} {f : ∀ a, γ a → δ a} (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨x.1, f _ x.2⟩ : List (Σ a, δ a)).dlookup a = (l.dlookup a).map (f a) :=
dlookup_map l Function.injective_id _ _
/-! ### `lookupAll` -/
/-- `lookup_all a l` is the list of all values in `l` corresponding to the key `a`. -/
def lookupAll (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (β a)
| [] => []
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then Eq.recOn h b :: lookupAll a l else lookupAll a l
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_nil (a : α) : lookupAll a [] = @nil (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookupAll a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = b :: lookupAll a l :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookupAll a (s :: l) = lookupAll a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem lookupAll_eq_nil {a : α} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, lookupAll a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp only [lookupAll_cons_eq, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and, not_or,
false_iff, not_forall, not_and, not_not, reduceCtorEq]
use b
simp
· simp [h, lookupAll_eq_nil]
theorem head?_lookupAll (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), head? (lookupAll a l) = dlookup a l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h; simp
· rw [lookupAll_cons_ne, dlookup_cons_ne, head?_lookupAll a l] <;> assumption
theorem mem_lookupAll {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ lookupAll a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
· simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
theorem lookupAll_sublist (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (lookupAll a l).map (Sigma.mk a) <+ l
| | [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp only [ne_eq, not_true, lookupAll_cons_eq, List.map]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons₂ _
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 282 | 287 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Coherent
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equiv
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformApproximation
/-!
# Topology and uniform structure of uniform convergence
This files endows `α → β` with the topologies / uniform structures of
- uniform convergence on `α`
- uniform convergence on a specified family `𝔖` of sets of `α`, also called `𝔖`-convergence
Since `α → β` is already endowed with the topologies and uniform structures of pointwise
convergence, we introduce type aliases `UniformFun α β` (denoted `α →ᵤ β`) and
`UniformOnFun α β 𝔖` (denoted `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`) and we actually endow *these* with the structures
of uniform and `𝔖`-convergence respectively.
Usual examples of the second construction include :
- the topology of compact convergence, when `𝔖` is the set of compacts of `α`
- the strong topology on the dual of a topological vector space (TVS) `E`, when `𝔖` is the set of
Von Neumann bounded subsets of `E`
- the weak-* topology on the dual of a TVS `E`, when `𝔖` is the set of singletons of `E`.
This file contains a lot of technical facts, so it is heavily commented, proofs included!
## Main definitions
* `UniformFun.gen`: basis sets for the uniformity of uniform convergence. These are sets
of the form `S(V) := {(f, g) | ∀ x : α, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for some `V : Set (β × β)`
* `UniformFun.uniformSpace`: uniform structure of uniform convergence. This is the
`UniformSpace` on `α →ᵤ β` whose uniformity is generated by the sets `S(V)` for `V ∈ 𝓤 β`.
We will denote this uniform space as `𝒰(α, β, uβ)`, both in the comments and as a local notation
in the Lean code, where `uβ` is the uniform space structure on `β`.
This is declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`.
* `UniformOnFun.uniformSpace`: uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, where
`𝔖 : Set (Set α)`. This is the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of the pullback of `𝒰 S β` by the map of
restriction to `S`. We will denote it `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`, where `uβ` is the uniform space structure
on `β`.
This is declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval`: evaluation is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`.
* `UniformFun.t2Space`: the topology of uniform convergence on `α →ᵤ β` is T₂ if
`β` is T₂.
* `UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly`: `𝒰(α, β, uβ)` is
indeed the uniform structure of uniform convergence
* `UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem`: evaluation at a point contained in a
set of `𝔖` is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`
* `UniformOnFun.t2Space_of_covering`: the topology of `𝔖`-convergence on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` is T₂ if
`β` is T₂ and `𝔖` covers `α`
* `UniformOnFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn`:
`𝒱(α, β, 𝔖 uβ)` is indeed the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence
### Functoriality and compatibility with product of uniform spaces
In order to avoid the need for filter bases as much as possible when using these definitions,
we develop an extensive API for manipulating these structures abstractly. As usual in the topology
section of mathlib, we first state results about the complete lattices of `UniformSpace`s on
fixed types, and then we use these to deduce categorical-like results about maps between two
uniform spaces.
We only describe these in the harder case of `𝔖`-convergence, as the names of the corresponding
results for uniform convergence can easily be guessed.
#### Order statements
* `UniformOnFun.mono`: let `u₁`, `u₂` be two uniform structures on `γ` and
`𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)`. If `u₁ ≤ u₂` and `𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁` then `𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂)`.
* `UniformOnFun.iInf_eq`: if `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i)`.
* `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`: if `u` is a uniform structures on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁)`.
An interesting note about these statements is that they are proved without ever unfolding the basis
definition of the uniform structure of uniform convergence! Instead, we build a
(not very interesting) Galois connection `UniformFun.gc` and then rely on the Galois
connection API to do most of the work.
#### Morphism statements (unbundled)
* `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous`: if `f : γ → β` is uniformly
continuous, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is uniformly continuous.
* `UniformOnFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing`: if `f : γ → β` is a uniform
inducing, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform inducing.
* `UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous`: let `f : γ → α`, `𝔖 : Set (Set α)`,
`𝔗 : Set (Set γ)`, and assume that `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, f '' T ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the function
`(fun g ↦ g ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β)` is uniformly continuous.
#### Isomorphism statements (bundled)
* `UniformOnFun.congrRight`: turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism
`(α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by post-composing.
* `UniformOnFun.congrLeft`: turn a bijection `e : γ ≃ α` such that we have both
`∀ T ∈ 𝔗, e '' T ∈ 𝔖` and `∀ S ∈ 𝔖, e ⁻¹' S ∈ 𝔗` into a uniform isomorphism
`(γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by pre-composing.
* `UniformOnFun.uniformEquivPiComm`: the natural bijection between `α → Π i, δ i`
and `Π i, α → δ i`, upgraded to a uniform isomorphism between `α →ᵤ[𝔖] (Π i, δ i)` and
`Π i, α →ᵤ[𝔖] δ i`.
#### Important use cases
* If `G` is a uniform group, then `α →ᵤ[𝔖] G` is a uniform group: since `(/) : G × G → G` is
uniformly continuous, `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous` tells us that
`((/) ∘ —) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G × G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is uniformly continuous. By precomposing with
`UniformOnFun.uniformEquivProdArrow`, this gives that
`(/) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is also uniformly continuous
* The transpose of a continuous linear map is continuous for the strong topologies: since
continuous linear maps are uniformly continuous and map bounded sets to bounded sets,
this is just a special case of `UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous`.
## TODO
* Show that the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence is exactly the structure of `𝔖'`-convergence,
where `𝔖'` is the ***noncovering*** bornology (i.e ***not*** what `Bornology` currently refers
to in mathlib) generated by `𝔖`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
uniform convergence
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Set Topology
open scoped Uniformity
section TypeAlias
/-- The type of functions from `α` to `β` equipped with the uniform structure and topology of
uniform convergence. We denote it `α →ᵤ β`. -/
def UniformFun (α β : Type*) :=
α → β
/-- The type of functions from `α` to `β` equipped with the uniform structure and topology of
uniform convergence on some family `𝔖` of subsets of `α`. We denote it `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def UniformOnFun (α β : Type*) (_ : Set (Set α)) :=
α → β
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UniformConvergence] notation:25 α " →ᵤ " β:0 => UniformFun α β
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UniformConvergence] notation:25 α " →ᵤ[" 𝔖 "] " β:0 => UniformOnFun α β 𝔖
open UniformConvergence
variable {α β : Type*} {𝔖 : Set (Set α)}
instance [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α →ᵤ β) := Pi.instNonempty
instance [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := Pi.instNonempty
instance [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α →ᵤ β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| α → β
instance [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| α → β
/-- Reinterpret `f : α → β` as an element of `α →ᵤ β`. -/
def UniformFun.ofFun : (α → β) ≃ (α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Reinterpret `f : α → β` as an element of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
def UniformOnFun.ofFun (𝔖) : (α → β) ≃ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Reinterpret `f : α →ᵤ β` as an element of `α → β`. -/
def UniformFun.toFun : (α →ᵤ β) ≃ (α → β) :=
UniformFun.ofFun.symm
/-- Reinterpret `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` as an element of `α → β`. -/
def UniformOnFun.toFun (𝔖) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ≃ (α → β) :=
(UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖).symm
@[simp] lemma UniformFun.toFun_ofFun (f : α → β) : toFun (ofFun f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformFun.ofFun_toFun (f : α →ᵤ β) : ofFun (toFun f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformOnFun.toFun_ofFun (f : α → β) : toFun 𝔖 (ofFun 𝔖 f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformOnFun.ofFun_toFun (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) : ofFun 𝔖 (toFun 𝔖 f) = f := rfl
-- Note: we don't declare a `CoeFun` instance because Lean wouldn't insert it when writing
-- `f x` (because of definitional equality with `α → β`).
end TypeAlias
open UniformConvergence
namespace UniformFun
variable (α β : Type*) {γ ι : Type*}
variable {p : Filter ι}
/-- Basis sets for the uniformity of uniform convergence: `gen α β V` is the set of pairs `(f, g)`
of functions `α →ᵤ β` such that `∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V`. -/
protected def gen (V : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
{ uv : (α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β) | ∀ x, (toFun uv.1 x, toFun uv.2 x) ∈ V }
/-- If `𝓕` is a filter on `β × β`, then the set of all `UniformFun.gen α β V` for
`V ∈ 𝓕` is a filter basis on `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)`. This will only be applied to `𝓕 = 𝓤 β` when
`β` is equipped with a `UniformSpace` structure, but it is useful to define it for any filter in
order to be able to state that it has a lower adjoint (see `UniformFun.gc`). -/
protected theorem isBasis_gen (𝓑 : Filter <| β × β) :
IsBasis (fun V : Set (β × β) => V ∈ 𝓑) (UniformFun.gen α β) :=
⟨⟨univ, univ_mem⟩, @fun U V hU hV =>
⟨U ∩ V, inter_mem hU hV, fun _ huv => ⟨fun x => (huv x).left, fun x => (huv x).right⟩⟩⟩
/-- For `𝓕 : Filter (β × β)`, this is the set of all `UniformFun.gen α β V` for
`V ∈ 𝓕` as a bundled `FilterBasis` over `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)`. This will only be applied to
`𝓕 = 𝓤 β` when `β` is equipped with a `UniformSpace` structure, but it is useful to define it for
any filter in order to be able to state that it has a lower adjoint
(see `UniformFun.gc`). -/
protected def basis (𝓕 : Filter <| β × β) : FilterBasis ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
(UniformFun.isBasis_gen α β 𝓕).filterBasis
/-- For `𝓕 : Filter (β × β)`, this is the filter generated by the filter basis
`UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕`. For `𝓕 = 𝓤 β`, this will be the uniformity of uniform
convergence on `α`. -/
protected def filter (𝓕 : Filter <| β × β) : Filter ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
(UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕).filter
--local notation "Φ" => fun (α β : Type*) (uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α) =>
--(uvx.fst.fst uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2)
protected def phi (α β : Type*) (uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α) : β × β :=
(uvx.fst.fst uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2)
set_option quotPrecheck false -- Porting note: error message suggested to do this
/- This is a lower adjoint to `UniformFun.filter` (see `UniformFun.gc`).
The exact definition of the lower adjoint `l` is not interesting; we will only use that it exists
(in `UniformFun.mono` and `UniformFun.iInf_eq`) and that
`l (Filter.map (Prod.map f f) 𝓕) = Filter.map (Prod.map ((∘) f) ((∘) f)) (l 𝓕)` for each
`𝓕 : Filter (γ × γ)` and `f : γ → α` (in `UniformFun.comap_eq`). -/
local notation "lowerAdjoint" => fun 𝓐 => map (UniformFun.phi α β) (𝓐 ×ˢ ⊤)
/-- The function `UniformFun.filter α β : Filter (β × β) → Filter ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β))`
has a lower adjoint `l` (in the sense of `GaloisConnection`). The exact definition of `l` is not
interesting; we will only use that it exists (in `UniformFun.mono` and
`UniformFun.iInf_eq`) and that
`l (Filter.map (Prod.map f f) 𝓕) = Filter.map (Prod.map ((∘) f) ((∘) f)) (l 𝓕)` for each
`𝓕 : Filter (γ × γ)` and `f : γ → α` (in `UniformFun.comap_eq`). -/
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection lowerAdjoint fun 𝓕 => UniformFun.filter α β 𝓕 := by
intro 𝓐 𝓕
symm
calc
𝓐 ≤ UniformFun.filter α β 𝓕 ↔ (UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕).sets ⊆ 𝓐.sets := by
rw [UniformFun.filter, ← FilterBasis.generate, le_generate_iff]
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕, UniformFun.gen α β U ∈ 𝓐 := image_subset_iff
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕,
{ uv | ∀ x, (uv, x) ∈ { t : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α | (t.1.1 t.2, t.1.2 t.2) ∈ U } } ∈
𝓐 :=
Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕,
{ uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α | (uvx.1.1 uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2) ∈ U } ∈
𝓐 ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall₂_congr fun U _hU => mem_prod_top.symm
_ ↔ lowerAdjoint 𝓐 ≤ 𝓕 := Iff.rfl
variable [UniformSpace β]
/-- Core of the uniform structure of uniform convergence. -/
protected def uniformCore : UniformSpace.Core (α →ᵤ β) :=
UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis (UniformFun.basis α β (𝓤 β))
(fun _ ⟨_, hV, hVU⟩ _ => hVU ▸ fun _ => refl_mem_uniformity hV)
(fun _ ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩ =>
hVU ▸
⟨UniformFun.gen α β (Prod.swap ⁻¹' V), ⟨Prod.swap ⁻¹' V, tendsto_swap_uniformity hV, rfl⟩,
fun _ huv x => huv x⟩)
fun _ ⟨_, hV, hVU⟩ =>
hVU ▸
let ⟨W, hW, hWV⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hV
⟨UniformFun.gen α β W, ⟨W, hW, rfl⟩, fun _ ⟨w, huw, hwv⟩ x => hWV ⟨w x, ⟨huw x, hwv x⟩⟩⟩
/-- Uniform structure of uniform convergence, declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`.
We will denote it `𝒰(α, β, uβ)` in the rest of this file. -/
instance uniformSpace : UniformSpace (α →ᵤ β) :=
UniformSpace.ofCore (UniformFun.uniformCore α β)
/-- Topology of uniform convergence, declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`. -/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (α →ᵤ β) :=
inferInstance
local notation "𝒰(" α ", " β ", " u ")" => @UniformFun.uniformSpace α β u
/-- By definition, the uniformity of `α →ᵤ β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}`
for `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ β)).HasBasis (· ∈ 𝓤 β) (UniformFun.gen α β) :=
(UniformFun.isBasis_gen α β (𝓤 β)).hasBasis
/-- The uniformity of `α →ᵤ β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓑` as
a filter basis, for any basis `𝓑` of `𝓤 β` (in the case `𝓑 = (𝓤 β).as_basis` this is true by
definition). -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) : (𝓤 (α →ᵤ β)).HasBasis p (UniformFun.gen α β ∘ s) :=
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).to_hasBasis
(fun _ hU =>
let ⟨i, hi, hiU⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp hU
⟨i, hi, fun _ huv x => hiU (huv x)⟩)
fun i hi => ⟨s i, h.mem_of_mem hi, subset_refl _⟩
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ β`, `𝓝 f` admits the family `{g | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter
basis, for any basis `𝓑` of `𝓤 β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_basis (f) {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis p fun i => { g | (f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β (s i) } :=
nhds_basis_uniformity' (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β h)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ β`, `𝓝 f` admits the family `{g | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a
filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds (f) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun V => V ∈ 𝓤 β) fun V => { g | (f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β V } :=
UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis α β f (Filter.basis_sets _)
variable {α}
/-- Evaluation at a fixed point is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_eval (x : α) :
UniformContinuous (Function.eval x ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ β) → β) := by
change _ ≤ _
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).le_basis_iff ((𝓤 _).basis_sets.comap _)]
exact fun U hU => ⟨U, hU, fun uv huv => huv x⟩
variable {β}
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_gen {β} {f g : α →ᵤ β} {V : Set (β × β)} :
(f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β V ↔ ∀ x, (toFun f x, toFun g x) ∈ V :=
.rfl
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ` and `u₁ ≤ u₂`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ≤ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem mono : Monotone (@UniformFun.uniformSpace α γ) := fun _ _ hu =>
(UniformFun.gc α γ).monotone_u hu
/-- If `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i)`. -/
protected theorem iInf_eq {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} : 𝒰(α, γ, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i) := by
-- This follows directly from the fact that the upper adjoint in a Galois connection maps
-- infimas to infimas.
ext : 1
change UniformFun.filter α γ 𝓤[⨅ i, u i] = 𝓤[⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i)]
rw [iInf_uniformity, iInf_uniformity]
exact (UniformFun.gc α γ).u_iInf
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ⊓ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem inf_eq {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} :
𝒰(α, γ, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ⊓ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂) := by
-- This follows directly from the fact that the upper adjoint in a Galois connection maps
-- infimas to infimas.
rw [inf_eq_iInf, inf_eq_iInf, UniformFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
cases i <;> rfl
/-- Post-composition by a uniform inducing function is
a uniform inducing function for the uniform structures of uniform convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniform inducing,
then `(f ∘ ·) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)` is uniform inducing. -/
lemma postcomp_isUniformInducing [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨((UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).comap _).eq_of_same_basis <|
UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis _ _ (hf.basis_uniformity (𝓤 β).basis_sets)⟩
/-- Post-composition by a uniform embedding is
a uniform embedding for the uniform structures of uniform convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform embedding,
then `(f ∘ ·) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)` is a uniform embedding. -/
protected theorem postcomp_isUniformEmbedding [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
IsUniformEmbedding (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) where
toIsUniformInducing := UniformFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing hf.isUniformInducing
injective _ _ H := funext fun _ ↦ hf.injective (congrFun H _)
/-- If `u` is a uniform structures on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒰(α, γ, u₁)`. -/
protected theorem comap_eq {f : γ → β} :
𝒰(α, γ, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) = 𝒰(α, β, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := by
letI : UniformSpace γ := .comap f ‹_›
exact (UniformFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing (f := f) ⟨rfl⟩).comap_uniformSpace.symm
/-- Post-composition by a uniformly continuous function is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniformly continuous, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)`
is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformContinuous [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) :
UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformFun.comap_eq`
refine uniformContinuous_iff.mpr ?_
exact (UniformFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf)).trans_eq UniformFun.comap_eq
-- Porting note: the original calc proof below gives a deterministic timeout
--calc
-- 𝒰(α, γ, _) ≤ 𝒰(α, γ, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) :=
-- UniformFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf)
-- _ = 𝒰(α, β, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := @UniformFun.comap_eq α β γ _ f
/-- Turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism `(α →ᵤ γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β)` by
post-composing. -/
protected def congrRight [UniformSpace γ] (e : γ ≃ᵤ β) : (α →ᵤ γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) :=
{ Equiv.piCongrRight fun _ => e.toEquiv with
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.symm.uniformContinuous }
/-- Pre-composition by any function is uniformly continuous for the uniform structures of
uniform convergence.
More precisely, for any `f : γ → α`, the function `(· ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ β) → (γ →ᵤ β)` is uniformly
continuous. -/
protected theorem precomp_uniformContinuous {f : γ → α} :
UniformContinuous fun g : α →ᵤ β => ofFun (toFun g ∘ f) := by
-- Here we simply go back to filter bases.
rw [UniformContinuous,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity γ β)]
exact fun U hU => ⟨U, hU, fun uv huv x => huv (f x)⟩
/-- Turn a bijection `γ ≃ α` into a uniform isomorphism
`(γ →ᵤ β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β)` by pre-composing. -/
protected def congrLeft (e : γ ≃ α) : (γ →ᵤ β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) where
toEquiv := e.arrowCongr (.refl _)
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
/-- The natural map `UniformFun.toFun` from `α →ᵤ β` to `α → β` is uniformly continuous.
In other words, the uniform structure of uniform convergence is finer than that of pointwise
convergence, aka the product uniform structure. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_toFun : UniformContinuous (toFun : (α →ᵤ β) → α → β) := by
-- By definition of the product uniform structure, this is just `uniform_continuous_eval`.
rw [uniformContinuous_pi]
intro x
exact uniformContinuous_eval β x
/-- The topology of uniform convergence is T₂. -/
instance [T2Space β] : T2Space (α →ᵤ β) :=
.of_injective_continuous toFun.injective UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun.continuous
/-- The topology of uniform convergence indeed gives the same notion of convergence as
`TendstoUniformly`. -/
protected theorem tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly {F : ι → α →ᵤ β} {f : α →ᵤ β} :
Tendsto F p (𝓝 f) ↔ TendstoUniformly (toFun ∘ F) (toFun f) p := by
rw [(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds α β f).tendsto_right_iff, TendstoUniformly]
simp only [mem_setOf, UniformFun.gen, Function.comp_def]
/-- The natural bijection between `α → β × γ` and `(α → β) × (α → γ)`, upgraded to a uniform
isomorphism between `α →ᵤ β × γ` and `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ γ)`. -/
protected def uniformEquivProdArrow [UniformSpace γ] : (α →ᵤ β × γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ γ) :=
-- Denote `φ` this bijection. We want to show that
-- `comap φ (𝒰(α, β, uβ) × 𝒰(α, γ, uγ)) = 𝒰(α, β × γ, uβ × uγ)`.
-- But `uβ × uγ` is defined as `comap fst uβ ⊓ comap snd uγ`, so we just have to apply
-- `UniformFun.inf_eq` and `UniformFun.comap_eq`, which leaves us to check
-- that some square commutes.
Equiv.toUniformEquivOfIsUniformInducing (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _) <| by
constructor
change
comap (Prod.map (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _) (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _))
_ = _
simp_rw [UniformFun]
rw [← uniformity_comap]
congr
unfold instUniformSpaceProd
rw [UniformSpace.comap_inf, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap]
have := (@UniformFun.inf_eq α (β × γ)
(UniformSpace.comap Prod.fst ‹_›) (UniformSpace.comap Prod.snd ‹_›)).symm
rwa [UniformFun.comap_eq, UniformFun.comap_eq] at this
-- the relevant diagram commutes by definition
variable (α) (δ : ι → Type*) [∀ i, UniformSpace (δ i)]
/-- The natural bijection between `α → Π i, δ i` and `Π i, α → δ i`, upgraded to a uniform
isomorphism between `α →ᵤ (Π i, δ i)` and `Π i, α →ᵤ δ i`. -/
protected def uniformEquivPiComm : UniformEquiv (α →ᵤ ∀ i, δ i) (∀ i, α →ᵤ δ i) :=
-- Denote `φ` this bijection. We want to show that
-- `comap φ (Π i, 𝒰(α, δ i, uδ i)) = 𝒰(α, (Π i, δ i), (Π i, uδ i))`.
-- But `Π i, uδ i` is defined as `⨅ i, comap (eval i) (uδ i)`, so we just have to apply
-- `UniformFun.iInf_eq` and `UniformFun.comap_eq`, which leaves us to check
-- that some square commutes.
@Equiv.toUniformEquivOfIsUniformInducing
_ _ 𝒰(α, ∀ i, δ i, Pi.uniformSpace δ)
(@Pi.uniformSpace ι (fun i => α → δ i) fun i => 𝒰(α, δ i, _)) (Equiv.piComm _) <| by
refine @IsUniformInducing.mk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
change comap (Prod.map Function.swap Function.swap) _ = _
rw [← uniformity_comap]
congr
unfold Pi.uniformSpace
rw [UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore, UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore,
UniformSpace.comap_iInf, UniformFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
rw [← UniformSpace.comap_comap, UniformFun.comap_eq]
rfl
-- Like in the previous lemma, the diagram actually commutes by definition
/-- The set of continuous functions is closed in the uniform convergence topology.
This is a simple wrapper over `TendstoUniformly.continuous`. -/
theorem isClosed_setOf_continuous [TopologicalSpace α] :
IsClosed {f : α →ᵤ β | Continuous (toFun f)} := by
refine isClosed_iff_forall_filter.2 fun f u _ hu huf ↦ ?_
rw [← tendsto_id', UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly] at huf
exact huf.continuous (le_principal_iff.mp hu)
variable {α} (β) in
theorem uniformSpace_eq_inf_precomp_of_cover {δ₁ δ₂ : Type*} (φ₁ : δ₁ → α) (φ₂ : δ₂ → α)
(h_cover : range φ₁ ∪ range φ₂ = univ) :
𝒰(α, β, _) =
.comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ₁) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ₁, β, _) ⊓
.comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ₂) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ₂, β, _) := by
ext : 1
refine le_antisymm (le_inf ?_ ?_) ?_
· exact tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
· exact tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
· refine
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity δ₁ β |>.comap _).inf
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity δ₂ β |>.comap _)
|>.le_basis_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β) |>.mpr fun U hU ↦
⟨⟨U, U⟩, ⟨hU, hU⟩, fun ⟨f, g⟩ hfg x ↦ ?_⟩
rcases h_cover.ge <| mem_univ x with (⟨y, rfl⟩|⟨y, rfl⟩)
· exact hfg.1 y
· exact hfg.2 y
variable {α} (β) in
theorem uniformSpace_eq_iInf_precomp_of_cover {δ : ι → Type*} (φ : Π i, δ i → α)
(h_cover : ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ⋃ i ∈ I, range (φ i) = univ) :
𝒰(α, β, _) = ⨅ i, .comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ i) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ i, β, _) := by
ext : 1
simp_rw [iInf_uniformity, uniformity_comap]
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous) ?_
rcases h_cover with ⟨I, I_finite, I_cover⟩
refine Filter.hasBasis_iInf (fun i : ι ↦ UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity (δ i) β |>.comap _)
|>.le_basis_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β) |>.mpr fun U hU ↦
⟨⟨I, fun _ ↦ U⟩, ⟨I_finite, fun _ ↦ hU⟩, fun ⟨f, g⟩ hfg x ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.mp <| I_cover.ge <| mem_univ x with ⟨i, hi, y, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInter.mp hfg ⟨i, hi⟩ y
end UniformFun
namespace UniformOnFun
variable {α β : Type*} {γ ι : Type*}
variable {s : Set α} {p : Filter ι}
local notation "𝒰(" α ", " β ", " u ")" => @UniformFun.uniformSpace α β u
/-- Basis sets for the uniformity of `𝔖`-convergence: for `S : Set α` and `V : Set (β × β)`,
`gen 𝔖 S V` is the set of pairs `(f, g)` of functions `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` such that
`∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V`. Note that the family `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is only used to specify which
type alias of `α → β` to use here. -/
protected def gen (𝔖) (S : Set α) (V : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)) :=
{ uv : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) | ∀ x ∈ S, (toFun 𝔖 uv.1 x, toFun 𝔖 uv.2 x) ∈ V }
/-- For `S : Set α` and `V : Set (β × β)`, we have
`UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V = (S.restrict × S.restrict) ⁻¹' (UniformFun.gen S β V)`.
This is the crucial fact for proving that the family `UniformOnFun.gen S V` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and
`V ∈ 𝓤 β` is indeed a basis for the uniformity `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` endowed with `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`
the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, as defined in `UniformOnFun.uniformSpace`. -/
protected theorem gen_eq_preimage_restrict {𝔖} (S : Set α) (V : Set (β × β)) :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V =
Prod.map (S.restrict ∘ UniformFun.toFun) (S.restrict ∘ UniformFun.toFun) ⁻¹'
UniformFun.gen S β V := by
ext uv
exact ⟨fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ => h x hx, fun h x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
/-- `UniformOnFun.gen` is antitone in the first argument and monotone in the second. -/
protected theorem gen_mono {𝔖} {S S' : Set α} {V V' : Set (β × β)} (hS : S' ⊆ S) (hV : V ⊆ V') :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V ⊆ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S' V' := fun _uv h x hx => hV (h x <| hS hx)
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed and `𝓑` is a filter basis on `β × β`, then the
family `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓑` is a filter basis on
`(α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)`.
We will show in `has_basis_uniformity_of_basis` that, if `𝓑` is a basis for `𝓤 β`, then the
corresponding filter is the uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem isBasis_gen (𝔖 : Set (Set α)) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖)
(𝓑 : FilterBasis <| β × β) :
IsBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓑) fun SV =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 :=
⟨h.prod 𝓑.nonempty, fun {U₁V₁ U₂V₂} h₁ h₂ =>
let ⟨U₃, hU₃, hU₁₃, hU₂₃⟩ := h' U₁V₁.1 h₁.1 U₂V₂.1 h₂.1
let ⟨V₃, hV₃, hV₁₂₃⟩ := 𝓑.inter_sets h₁.2 h₂.2
⟨⟨U₃, V₃⟩,
⟨⟨hU₃, hV₃⟩, fun _ H =>
⟨fun x hx => (hV₁₂₃ <| H x <| hU₁₃ hx).1, fun x hx => (hV₁₂₃ <| H x <| hU₂₃ hx).2⟩⟩⟩⟩
variable (α β) [UniformSpace β] (𝔖 : Set (Set α))
/-- Uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, i.e uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`,
declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. It is defined as the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of the pullback
by `S.restrict`, the map of restriction to `S`, of the uniform structure `𝒰(s, β, uβ)` on
`↥S →ᵤ β`. We will denote it `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`, where `uβ` is the uniform structure on `β`. -/
instance uniformSpace : UniformSpace (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
⨅ (s : Set α) (_ : s ∈ 𝔖),
.comap (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ s.restrict ∘ UniformOnFun.toFun 𝔖) 𝒰(s, β, _)
local notation "𝒱(" α ", " β ", " 𝔖 ", " u ")" => @UniformOnFun.uniformSpace α β u 𝔖
/-- Topology of `𝔖`-convergence, i.e uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`, declared as an
instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, _).toTopologicalSpace
/-- The topology of `𝔖`-convergence is the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of topology induced by the map
of `S.restrict : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (↥S →ᵤ β)` of restriction to `S`, where `↥S →ᵤ β` is endowed with
the topology of uniform convergence. -/
protected theorem topologicalSpace_eq :
UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace α β 𝔖 =
⨅ (s : Set α) (_ : s ∈ 𝔖), TopologicalSpace.induced
(UniformFun.ofFun ∘ s.restrict ∘ toFun 𝔖) (UniformFun.topologicalSpace s β) := by
simp only [UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
rfl
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) (S : Set α) :
(@uniformity (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ((UniformFun.uniformSpace S β).comap S.restrict)).HasBasis p fun i =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S (s i) := by
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.gen_eq_preimage_restrict, uniformity_comap]
exact (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis S β hb).comap _
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ (h : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
DirectedOn
((fun s : Set α => (UniformFun.uniformSpace s β).comap (s.restrict : (α →ᵤ β) → s →ᵤ β)) ⁻¹'o
GE.ge)
𝔖 :=
h.mono fun _ _ hst =>
((UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb _).le_basis_iff
(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb _)).mpr
fun V hV => ⟨V, hV, UniformOnFun.gen_mono hst subset_rfl⟩
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed and `𝓑` is a filter basis of `𝓤 β`, then the
uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and
`V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖)
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun Si : Set α × ι => Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2) fun Si =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 Si.1 (s Si.2) := by
simp only [iInf_uniformity]
exact
hasBasis_biInf_of_directed h (fun S => UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S ∘ s) _
(fun S _hS => UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb S)
(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ α β 𝔖 h' hb)
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, then the uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` admits the
family `{(f, g) | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓤 β) fun SV =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 :=
UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 h h' (𝓤 β).basis_sets
variable {α β}
/-- Let `t i` be a nonempty directed subfamily of `𝔖`
such that every `s ∈ 𝔖` is included in some `t i`.
Let `V` bounded by `p` be a basis of entourages of `β`.
Then `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t i) (V j)` bounded by `p j` is a basis of entourages of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_covering_of_basis {ι ι' : Type*} [Nonempty ι]
{t : ι → Set α} {p : ι' → Prop} {V : ι' → Set (β × β)} (ht : ∀ i, t i ∈ 𝔖)
(hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ i, s ⊆ t i) (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p V) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun i : ι × ι' ↦ p i.2) fun i ↦
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t i.1) (V i.2) := by
have hne : 𝔖.Nonempty := (range_nonempty t).mono (range_subset_iff.2 ht)
have hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖 := fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ ↦ by
rcases hex s₁ hs₁, hex s₂ hs₂ with ⟨⟨i₁, his₁⟩, i₂, his₂⟩
rcases hdir i₁ i₂ with ⟨i, hi₁, hi₂⟩
exact ⟨t i, ht _, his₁.trans hi₁, his₂.trans hi₂⟩
refine (UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 hne hd hb).to_hasBasis
(fun ⟨s, i'⟩ ⟨hs, hi'⟩ ↦ ?_) fun ⟨i, i'⟩ hi' ↦ ⟨(t i, i'), ⟨ht i, hi'⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
rcases hex s hs with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨(i, i'), hi', UniformOnFun.gen_mono hi Subset.rfl⟩
/-- If `t n` is a monotone sequence of sets in `𝔖`
such that each `s ∈ 𝔖` is included in some `t n`
and `V n` is an antitone basis of entourages of `β`,
then `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t n) (V n)` is an antitone basis of entourages of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem hasAntitoneBasis_uniformity {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{t : ι → Set α} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(ht : ∀ n, t n ∈ 𝔖) (hmono : Monotone t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ n, s ⊆ t n)
(hb : HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 β) V) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasAntitoneBasis fun n ↦ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t n) (V n) := by
have := hb.nonempty
refine ⟨(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_covering_of_basis 𝔖
ht hmono.directed_le hex hb.1).to_hasBasis ?_ fun i _ ↦ ⟨(i, i), trivial, Subset.rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨k, l⟩ -
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) k l with ⟨n, hkn, hln⟩
exact ⟨n, trivial, UniformOnFun.gen_mono (hmono hkn) (hb.2 <| hln)⟩
· exact fun k l h ↦ UniformOnFun.gen_mono (hmono h) (hb.2 h)
protected theorem isCountablyGenerated_uniformity [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] {t : ℕ → Set α}
(ht : ∀ n, t n ∈ 𝔖) (hmono : Monotone t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ n, s ⊆ t n) :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)) :=
let ⟨_V, hV⟩ := exists_antitone_basis (𝓤 β)
(UniformOnFun.hasAntitoneBasis_uniformity 𝔖 ht hmono hex hV).isCountablyGenerated
variable (α β)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`, where `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, `𝓝 f` admits the
family `{g | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter basis, for any basis
`𝓑` of `𝓤 β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_basis (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty)
(h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun Si : Set α × ι => Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2) fun Si =>
{ g | (g, f) ∈ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 Si.1 (s Si.2) } :=
letI : UniformSpace (α → β) := UniformOnFun.uniformSpace α β 𝔖
nhds_basis_uniformity (UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 h h' hb)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`, where `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, `𝓝 f` admits the
family `{g | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓤 β) fun SV =>
{ g | (g, f) ∈ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 } :=
UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis α β 𝔖 f h h' (Filter.basis_sets _)
/-- If `S ∈ 𝔖`, then the restriction to `S` is a uniformly continuous map from `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` to
`↥S →ᵤ β`. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_restrict (h : s ∈ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (s.restrict : (α → β) → s → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
change _ ≤ _
simp only [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, map_le_iff_le_comap, iInf_uniformity]
exact iInf₂_le s h
variable {α}
/-- A version of `UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis`
with weaker conclusion and weaker assumptions.
We make no assumptions about the set `𝔖`
but conclude only that the uniformity is equal to some indexed infimum. -/
protected theorem uniformity_eq_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p V) :
𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), 𝓟 (UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s (V i)) := by
simp_rw [iInf_uniformity, uniformity_comap,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis _ _ h).eq_biInf, comap_iInf, comap_principal,
Function.comp_apply, UniformFun.gen, Subtype.forall, UniformOnFun.gen, preimage_setOf_eq,
Prod.map_fst, Prod.map_snd, Function.comp_apply, UniformFun.toFun_ofFun, restrict_apply]
protected theorem uniformity_eq : 𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ V ∈ 𝓤 β, 𝓟 (UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s V) :=
UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq_of_basis _ _ (𝓤 β).basis_sets
protected theorem gen_mem_uniformity (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 β) :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s V ∈ 𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := by
rw [UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq]
apply_rules [mem_iInf_of_mem, mem_principal_self]
/-- A version of `UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis`
with weaker conclusion and weaker assumptions.
We make no assumptions about the set `𝔖`
but conclude only that the neighbourhoods filter is equal to some indexed infimum. -/
protected theorem nhds_eq_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p V) (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), 𝓟 {g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V i} := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq_of_basis _ _ h, comap_iInf,
comap_principal, UniformOnFun.gen, preimage_setOf_eq]
protected theorem nhds_eq (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ V ∈ 𝓤 β, 𝓟 {g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V} :=
UniformOnFun.nhds_eq_of_basis _ _ (𝓤 β).basis_sets f
protected theorem gen_mem_nhds (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V} ∈ 𝓝 f := by
rw [UniformOnFun.nhds_eq]
apply_rules [mem_iInf_of_mem, mem_principal_self]
theorem uniformContinuous_ofUniformFun :
UniformContinuous fun f : α →ᵤ β ↦ ofFun 𝔖 (UniformFun.toFun f) := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).eventually_iff]
exact fun _ _ U hU ↦ ⟨U, hU, fun f hf x _ ↦ hf x⟩
/-- The uniformity on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` is the same as the uniformity on `α →ᵤ β`,
provided that `Set.univ ∈ 𝔖`.
Here we formulate it as a `UniformEquiv`. -/
def uniformEquivUniformFun (h : univ ∈ 𝔖) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) where
toFun f := UniformFun.ofFun <| toFun _ f
invFun f := ofFun _ <| UniformFun.toFun f
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
uniformContinuous_toFun := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).tendsto_right_iff]
intro U hU
filter_upwards [UniformOnFun.gen_mem_uniformity _ _ h hU] with f hf x using hf x (mem_univ _)
uniformContinuous_invFun := uniformContinuous_ofUniformFun _ _
/-- Let `u₁`, `u₂` be two uniform structures on `γ` and `𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)`. If `u₁ ≤ u₂` and
`𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁` then `𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem mono ⦃u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ⦄ (hu : u₁ ≤ u₂) ⦃𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)⦄
(h𝔖 : 𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁) : 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂) :=
calc
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₁) := iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h𝔖
_ ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂) := iInf₂_mono fun _i _hi => UniformSpace.comap_mono <| UniformFun.mono hu
/-- If `x : α` is in some `S ∈ 𝔖`, then evaluation at `x` is uniformly continuous on
`α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous ((Function.eval x : (α → β) → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) :=
(UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval β (⟨x, hxs⟩ : s)).comp
(UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_restrict α β 𝔖 hs)
theorem uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem_sUnion {x : α} (hx : x ∈ ⋃₀ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous ((Function.eval x : (α → β) → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) :=
let ⟨_s, hs, hxs⟩ := hx
uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem _ _ hxs hs
variable {β} {𝔖}
theorem uniformContinuous_eval (h : ⋃₀ 𝔖 = univ) (x : α) :
UniformContinuous ((Function.eval x : (α → β) → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) :=
uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem_sUnion _ _ <| h.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- If `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i)`. -/
protected theorem iInf_eq {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} :
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, ⨅ i, u i) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i) := by
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, UniformFun.iInf_eq, UniformSpace.comap_iInf]
rw [iInf_comm]
exact iInf_congr fun s => iInf_comm
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁) ⊓ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem inf_eq {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} :
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁) ⊓ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₂) := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf, inf_eq_iInf, UniformOnFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
cases i <;> rfl
/-- If `u` is a uniform structure on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁)`. -/
protected theorem comap_eq {f : γ → β} :
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) = 𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := by
-- We reduce this to `UniformFun.comap_eq` using the fact that `comap` distributes
-- on `iInf`.
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, UniformSpace.comap_iInf, UniformFun.comap_eq, ←
UniformSpace.comap_comap]
-- By definition, `∀ S ∈ 𝔖, (f ∘ —) ∘ S.restrict = S.restrict ∘ (f ∘ —)`.
rfl
/-- Post-composition by a uniformly continuous function is uniformly continuous for the
uniform structures of `𝔖`-convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniformly continuous, then
`(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformContinuous [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : UniformContinuous (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`
rw [uniformContinuous_iff]
exact (UniformOnFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf) subset_rfl).trans_eq UniformOnFun.comap_eq
/-- Post-composition by a uniform inducing is a uniform inducing for the
uniform structures of `𝔖`-convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform inducing, then
`(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform inducing. -/
lemma postcomp_isUniformInducing [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`
constructor
replace hf : (𝓤 β).comap (Prod.map f f) = _ := hf.comap_uniformity
change comap (Prod.map (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖)) _ = _
rw [← uniformity_comap] at hf ⊢
congr
rw [← UniformSpace.ext hf, UniformOnFun.comap_eq]
rfl
/-- Post-composition by a uniform embedding is a uniform embedding for the
uniform structures of `𝔖`-convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform embedding, then
`(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform embedding. -/
protected theorem postcomp_isUniformEmbedding [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) : IsUniformEmbedding (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) where
toIsUniformInducing := UniformOnFun.postcomp_isUniformInducing hf.isUniformInducing
injective _ _ H := funext fun _ ↦ hf.injective (congrFun H _)
/-- Turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism `(α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)`
by post-composing. -/
protected def congrRight [UniformSpace γ] (e : γ ≃ᵤ β) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
{ Equiv.piCongrRight fun _a => e.toEquiv with
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.symm.uniformContinuous }
/-- Let `f : γ → α`, `𝔖 : Set (Set α)`, `𝔗 : Set (Set γ)`, and assume that `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, f '' T ∈ 𝔖`.
Then, the function `(fun g ↦ g ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β)` is uniformly continuous.
Note that one can easily see that assuming `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, ∃ S ∈ 𝔖, f '' T ⊆ S` would work too, but
we will get this for free when we prove that `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ) = 𝒱(α, β, 𝔖', uβ)` where `𝔖'` is the
***noncovering*** bornology generated by `𝔖`. -/
protected theorem precomp_uniformContinuous {𝔗 : Set (Set γ)} {f : γ → α}
(hf : MapsTo (f '' ·) 𝔗 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous fun g : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β => ofFun 𝔗 (toFun 𝔖 g ∘ f) := by
-- This follows from the fact that `(· ∘ f) × (· ∘ f)` maps `gen (f '' t) V` to `gen t V`.
simp_rw [UniformContinuous, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq, tendsto_iInf]
| refine fun t ht V hV ↦ tendsto_iInf' (f '' t) <| tendsto_iInf' (hf ht) <|
tendsto_iInf' V <| tendsto_iInf' hV ?_
simpa only [tendsto_principal_principal, UniformOnFun.gen] using fun _ ↦ forall_mem_image.1
/-- Turn a bijection `e : γ ≃ α` such that we have both `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, e '' T ∈ 𝔖` and
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergenceTopology.lean | 903 | 907 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.CompactConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equiv
/-!
# Ascoli Theorem
In this file, we prove the general **Arzela-Ascoli theorem**, and various related statements about
the topology of equicontinuous subsetes of `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α`, where `X` is a topological space, `𝔖` is
a family of compact subsets of `X`, and `α` is a uniform space.
## Main statements
* If `X` is a compact space, then the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence coincide on equicontinuous subsets. This is the key fact that makes equicontinuity
important in functional analysis. We state various versions of it:
- as an equality of `UniformSpace`s: `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`
- in terms of `IsUniformInducing`: `Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi`
- in terms of `IsInducing`: `Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi`
- in terms of convergence along a filter: `Equicontinuous.tendsto_uniformFun_iff_pi`
* As a consequence, if `𝔖` is a family of compact subsets of `X`, then the uniform structures of
uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence on `⋃₀ 𝔖` coincide on equicontinuous
subsets. Again, we prove multiple variations:
- as an equality of `UniformSpace`s: `EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq`
- in terms of `IsUniformInducing`: `EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
- in terms of `IsInducing`: `EquicontinuousOn.inducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
- in terms of convergence along a filter: `EquicontinuousOn.tendsto_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
* The **Arzela-Ascoli theorem** follows from the previous fact and Tykhonov's theorem.
All of its variations can be found under the `ArzelaAscoli` namespace.
## Implementation details
* The statements in this file may be a bit daunting because we prove everything for families and
embeddings instead of subspaces with the subspace topology. This is done because, in practice,
one would rarely work with `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` directly, so we need to provide API for bringing back the
statements to various other types, such as `C(X, Y)` or `E →L[𝕜] F`. To counteract this, all
statements (as well as most proofs!) are documented quite thoroughly.
* A lot of statements assume `∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K` instead of the more natural
`EquicontinuousOn F (⋃₀ 𝔖)`. This is in order to keep the most generality, as the first statement
is strictly weaker.
* In Bourbaki, the usual Arzela-Ascoli compactness theorem follows from a similar total boundedness
result. Here we go directly for the compactness result, which is the most useful in practice, but
this will be an easy addition/refactor if we ever need it.
## TODO
* Prove that, on an equicontinuous family, pointwise convergence and pointwise convergence on a
dense subset coincide, and deduce metrizability criterions for equicontinuous subsets.
* Prove the total boundedness version of the theorem
* Prove the converse statement: if a subset of `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` is compact, then it is equicontinuous
on each `K ∈ 𝔖`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
open Set Filter Uniformity Topology Function UniformConvergence
variable {ι X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [UniformSpace α] {F : ι → X → α}
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence induce the same uniform structure on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
Consider using `Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi` and
`Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi` instead, to avoid rewriting instances. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq [CompactSpace X] (F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
(UniformFun.uniformSpace X α).comap F =
(Pi.uniformSpace _).comap F := by
-- The `≤` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm (UniformSpace.comap_mono UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun) ?_
-- A bit of rewriting to get a nice intermediate statement.
simp_rw [UniformSpace.comap, UniformSpace.le_def, uniformity_comap, Pi.uniformity,
Filter.comap_iInf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
refine ((UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity X α).comap (Prod.map F F)).ge_iff.mpr ?_
-- Core of the proof: we need to show that, for any entourage `U` in `α`,
-- the set `𝐓(U) := {(i,j) : ι × ι | ∀ x : X, (F i x, F j x) ∈ U}` belongs to the filter
-- `⨅ x, comap ((i,j) ↦ (F i x, F j x)) (𝓤 α)`.
-- In other words, we have to show that it contains a finite intersection of
-- sets of the form `𝐒(V, x) := {(i,j) : ι × ι | (F i x, F j x) ∈ V}` for some
-- `x : X` and `V ∈ 𝓤 α`.
intro U hU
-- We will do an `ε/3` argument, so we start by choosing a symmetric entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 α`
-- such that `V ○ V ○ V ⊆ U`.
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, Vsymm, hVU⟩
-- Set `Ω x := {y | ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ V}`. The equicontinuity of `F` guarantees that
-- each `Ω x` is a neighborhood of `x`.
let Ω x : Set X := {y | ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ V}
-- Hence, by compactness of `X`, we can find some `A ⊆ X` finite such that the `Ω a`s for `a ∈ A`
-- still cover `X`.
rcases CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover Ω (fun x ↦ F_eqcont x V hV) with ⟨A, Acover⟩
-- We now claim that `⋂ a ∈ A, 𝐒(V, a) ⊆ 𝐓(U)`.
have : (⋂ a ∈ A, {ij : ι × ι | (F ij.1 a, F ij.2 a) ∈ V}) ⊆
(Prod.map F F) ⁻¹' UniformFun.gen X α U := by
-- Given `(i, j) ∈ ⋂ a ∈ A, 𝐒(V, a)` and `x : X`, we have to prove that `(F i x, F j x) ∈ U`.
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij x
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hij
-- We know that `x ∈ Ω a` for some `a ∈ A`, so that both `(F i x, F i a)` and `(F j a, F j x)`
-- are in `V`.
rcases mem_iUnion₂.mp (Acover.symm.subset <| mem_univ x) with ⟨a, ha, hax⟩
-- Since `(i, j) ∈ 𝐒(V, a)` we also have `(F i a, F j a) ∈ V`, and finally we get
-- `(F i x, F j x) ∈ V ○ V ○ V ⊆ U`.
exact hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel (prodMk_mem_compRel
(Vsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hax i)) (hij a ha)) (hax j))
-- This completes the proof.
exact mem_of_superset
(A.iInter_mem_sets.mpr fun x _ ↦ mem_iInf_of_mem x <| preimage_mem_comap hV) this
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence induce the same uniform structure on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a version of `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq` stated in terms of `IsUniformInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi [UniformSpace ι] [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
IsUniformInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ↔ IsUniformInducing F := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace, isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace,
← F_eqcont.comap_uniformFun_eq]
rfl
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the topologies of uniform convergence and pointwise convergence induce
the same topology on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a consequence of `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`, stated in terms of `IsInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi [TopologicalSpace ι] [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
IsInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ↔ IsInducing F := by
rw [isInducing_iff, isInducing_iff]
change (_ = (UniformFun.uniformSpace X α |>.comap F |>.toTopologicalSpace)) ↔
(_ = (Pi.uniformSpace _ |>.comap F |>.toTopologicalSpace))
rw [F_eqcont.comap_uniformFun_eq]
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family, and `ℱ` a filter on `ι`. Then, `F` tends *uniformly* to `f : X → α` along
`ℱ` iff it tends to `f` *pointwise* along `ℱ`. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.tendsto_uniformFun_iff_pi [CompactSpace X]
| (F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) (ℱ : Filter ι) (f : X → α) :
Tendsto (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ℱ (𝓝 <| UniformFun.ofFun f) ↔
Tendsto F ℱ (𝓝 f) := by
-- Assume `ℱ` is non trivial.
rcases ℱ.eq_or_neBot with rfl | ℱ_ne
· simp
constructor <;> intro H
-- The forward direction is always true, the interesting part is the converse.
· exact UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun.continuous.tendsto _|>.comp H
-- To prove it, assume that `F` tends to `f` *pointwise* along `ℱ`.
· set S : Set (X → α) := closure (range F)
set 𝒢 : Filter S := comap (↑) (map F ℱ)
-- We would like to use `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`, but applying it to `F` is not
-- enough since `f` has no reason to be in the range of `F`.
-- Instead, we will apply it to the inclusion `(↑) : S → (X → α)` where `S` is the closure of
-- the range of `F` *for the product topology*.
-- We know that `S` is still equicontinuous...
have hS : S.Equicontinuous := closure' (by rwa [equicontinuous_iff_range] at F_eqcont)
continuous_id
-- ... hence, as announced, the product topology and uniform convergence topology
-- coincide on `S`.
have ind : IsInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (↑) : S → X →ᵤ α) :=
hS.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi.mpr ⟨rfl⟩
-- By construction, `f` is in `S`.
have f_mem : f ∈ S := mem_closure_of_tendsto H range_mem_map
-- To conclude, we just have to translate our hypothesis and goal as statements about
-- `S`, on which we know the two topologies at play coincide.
-- For this, we define a filter on `S` by `𝒢 := comap (↑) (map F ℱ)`, and note that
-- it satisfies `map (↑) 𝒢 = map F ℱ`. Thus, both our hypothesis and our goal
-- can be rewritten as `𝒢 ≤ 𝓝 f`, where the neighborhood filter in the RHS corresponds
-- to one of the two topologies at play on `S`. Since they coincide, we are done.
have h𝒢ℱ : map (↑) 𝒢 = map F ℱ := Filter.map_comap_of_mem
(Subtype.range_coe ▸ mem_of_superset range_mem_map subset_closure)
have H' : Tendsto id 𝒢 (𝓝 ⟨f, f_mem⟩) := by
rwa [tendsto_id', nhds_induced, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, h𝒢ℱ]
rwa [ind.tendsto_nhds_iff, comp_id, ← tendsto_map'_iff, h𝒢ℱ] at H'
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Ascoli.lean | 163 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
end OrderedRing
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
variable {R}
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
alias ⟨_, Wbtw.mem_segment⟩ := mem_segment_iff_wbtw
lemma Convex.mem_of_wbtw {p₀ p₁ p₂ : V} {s : Set V} (hs : Convex R s) (h₀₁₂ : Wbtw R p₀ p₁ p₂)
(h₀ : p₀ ∈ s) (h₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : p₁ ∈ s := hs.segment_subset h₀ h₂ h₀₁₂.mem_segment
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
end OrderedRing
lemma AffineSubspace.mem_of_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxyz : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by obtain ⟨ε, -, rfl⟩ := hxyz; exact lineMap_mem _ hx hz
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
end OrderedRing
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
variable {R}
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
simp
rw [or_iff_right hxy, Wbtw, affineSegment, (lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Sbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne, and_comm, and_congr_right]
intro hxy
rw [(lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Wbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
wbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Sbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 :=
sbtw_lineMap_iff
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment, Set.mem_image]
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_ring]
simp
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_zero_one_iff]
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Sbtw, wbtw_zero_one_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Ioo]
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1.1.lt_of_ne (Ne.symm h.2.1), h.1.2.lt_of_ne h.2.2⟩, fun h =>
⟨⟨h.1.le, h.2.le⟩, h.1.ne', h.2.ne⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_zero_one_iff]
theorem Wbtw.trans_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : Wbtw R w x z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨t₂ * t₁, ⟨mul_nonneg ht₂.1 ht₁.1, mul_le_one₀ ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, lineMap_vsub_left, smul_smul]
theorem Wbtw.trans_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_left h₂
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z := by
refine ⟨h₁.trans_left h₂.wbtw, h₂.ne_left, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact h₂.right_ne ((wbtw_swap_right_iff R w).1 ⟨h₁, h₂.wbtw⟩)
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
| rw [sbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_sbtw_left h₂
theorem Sbtw.trans_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 438 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# The primitive recursive functions
The primitive recursive functions are the least collection of functions
`ℕ → ℕ` which are closed under projections (using the `pair`
pairing function), composition, zero, successor, and primitive recursion
(i.e. `Nat.rec` where the motive is `C n := ℕ`).
We can extend this definition to a large class of basic types by
using canonical encodings of types as natural numbers (Gödel numbering),
which we implement through the type class `Encodable`. (More precisely,
we need that the composition of encode with decode yields a
primitive recursive function, so we have the `Primcodable` type class
for this.)
In the above, the pairing function is primitive recursive by definition.
This deviates from the textbook definition of primitive recursive functions,
which instead work with *`n`-ary* functions. We formalize the textbook
definition in `Nat.Primrec'`. `Nat.Primrec'.prim_iff` then proves it is
equivalent to our chosen formulation. For more discussionn of this and
other design choices in this formalization, see [carneiro2019].
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions `f : ℕ → ℕ`
- `Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Primcodable α`: well-behaved encoding of `α` into `ℕ`, i.e. one such that roundtripping through
the encoding functions adds no computational power
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Denumerable Encodable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Calls the given function on a pair of entries `n`, encoded via the pairing function. -/
@[simp, reducible]
def unpaired {α} (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : α :=
f n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
/-- The primitive recursive functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
protected inductive Primrec : (ℕ → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Nat.Primrec fun _ => 0
| protected succ : Nat.Primrec succ
| left : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.1
| right : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => pair (f n) (g n)
| comp {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => f (g n)
| prec {f g} :
Nat.Primrec f →
Nat.Primrec g →
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.rec (f z) fun y IH => g <| pair z <| pair y IH)
namespace Primrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Nat.Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const : ∀ n : ℕ, Nat.Primrec fun _ => n
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => Primrec.succ.comp (const n)
protected theorem id : Nat.Primrec id :=
(left.pair right).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem prec1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) :
Nat.Primrec fun n => n.rec m fun y IH => f <| Nat.pair y IH :=
((prec (const m) (hf.comp right)).comp (zero.pair Primrec.id)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem casesOn1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Nat.Primrec (Nat.casesOn · m f) :=
(prec1 m (hf.comp left)).of_eq <| by simp
-- Porting note: `Nat.Primrec.casesOn` is already declared as a recursor.
theorem casesOn' {f g} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (hg : Nat.Primrec g) :
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.casesOn (f z) fun y => g <| Nat.pair z y) :=
(prec hf (hg.comp (pair left (left.comp right)))).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem swap : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap Nat.pair)) :=
(pair right left).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem swap' {f} (hf : Nat.Primrec (unpaired f)) : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap f)) :=
(hf.comp .swap).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem pred : Nat.Primrec pred :=
(casesOn1 0 Primrec.id).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp [*]
theorem add : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· + ·)) :=
(prec .id ((Primrec.succ.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem sub : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· - ·)) :=
(prec .id ((pred.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
theorem mul : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· * ·)) :=
(prec zero (add.comp (pair left (right.comp right)))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, mul_succ, add_comm _ (unpair p).fst]
theorem pow : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· ^ ·)) :=
(prec (const 1) (mul.comp (pair (right.comp right) left))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.pow_succ]
end Primrec
end Nat
/-- A `Primcodable` type is, essentially, an `Encodable` type for which
the encode/decode functions are primitive recursive.
However, such a definition is circular.
Instead, we ask that the composition of `decode : ℕ → Option α` with
`encode : Option α → ℕ` is primitive recursive. Said composition is
the identity function, restricted to the image of `encode`.
Thus, in a way, the added requirement ensures that no predicates
can be smuggled in through a cunning choice of the subset of `ℕ` into
which the type is encoded. -/
class Primcodable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
-- Porting note: was `prim [] `.
-- This means that `prim` does not take the type explicitly in Lean 4
prim : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (decode n)
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance (priority := 10) ofDenumerable (α) [Denumerable α] : Primcodable α :=
⟨Nat.Primrec.succ.of_eq <| by simp⟩
/-- Builds a `Primcodable` instance from an equivalence to a `Primcodable` type. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Primcodable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Primcodable β :=
{ __ := Encodable.ofEquiv α e
prim := (@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by
rw [decode_ofEquiv]
cases (@decode α _ n) <;>
simp [encode_ofEquiv] }
instance empty : Primcodable Empty :=
⟨zero⟩
instance unit : Primcodable PUnit :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 zero).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp⟩
instance option {α : Type*} [h : Primcodable α] : Primcodable (Option α) :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 ((casesOn1 0 (.comp .succ .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _))).of_eq fun n => by
cases n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n =>
rw [decode_option_succ]
cases H : @decode α _ n <;> simp [H]⟩
instance bool : Primcodable Bool :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 (casesOn1 2 zero)).of_eq fun n => match n with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| (n + 2) => by rw [decode_ge_two] <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
/-- `Primrec f` means `f` is primitive recursive (after
encoding its input and output as natural numbers). -/
def Primrec {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Nat.Primrec fun n => encode ((@decode α _ n).map f)
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
protected theorem encode : Primrec (@encode α _) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem decode : Primrec (@decode α _) :=
Nat.Primrec.succ.comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)
theorem dom_denumerable {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec fun n => encode (f (ofNat α n)) :=
⟨fun h => (pred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp, fun h =>
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp⟩
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} : Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec f :=
dom_denumerable
theorem encdec : Primrec fun n => encode (@decode α _ n) :=
nat_iff.2 Primcodable.prim
theorem option_some : Primrec (@some α) :=
((casesOn1 0 (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec fun _ : α => x :=
((casesOn1 0 (.const (encode x).succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem id : Primrec (@id α) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α).of_eq <| by simp
theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) :=
((casesOn1 0 (.comp hf (pred.comp hg))).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem succ : Primrec Nat.succ :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.succ
theorem pred : Primrec Nat.pred :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.pred
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl, Primrec.encode.comp⟩
theorem ofNat_iff {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Primrec fun n => f (ofNat α n) :=
dom_denumerable.trans <| nat_iff.symm.trans encode_iff
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Primrec (ofNat α) :=
ofNat_iff.1 Primrec.id
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => some (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| pred.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e :=
letI : Primcodable β := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 Primrec.encode
theorem of_equiv_symm {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e.symm :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 (show Primrec fun a => encode (e (e.symm a)) by simp [Primrec.encode])
theorem of_equiv_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → β} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv_symm.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv_symm_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e.symm (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv_symm.comp⟩
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance prod {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primcodable (α × β) :=
⟨((casesOn' zero ((casesOn' zero .succ).comp (pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1; · simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem fst {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.fst α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp left)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem snd {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.snd α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp right)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem pair {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => (f a, g a) :=
((casesOn1 0
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp <|
.pair (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf) (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hg))).comp
(@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq
fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem unpair : Primrec Nat.unpair :=
(pair (nat_iff.2 .left) (nat_iff.2 .right)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem list_getElem?₁ : ∀ l : List α, Primrec (l[·]? : ℕ → Option α)
| [] => dom_denumerable.2 zero
| a :: l =>
dom_denumerable.2 <|
(casesOn1 (encode a).succ <| dom_denumerable.1 <| list_getElem?₁ l).of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get?₁ := list_getElem?₁
end Primrec
/-- `Primrec₂ f` means `f` is a binary primitive recursive function.
This is technically unnecessary since we can always curry all
the arguments together, but there are enough natural two-arg
functions that it is convenient to express this directly. -/
def Primrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- `PrimrecPred p` means `p : α → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive predicate, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecPred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :=
Primrec fun a => decide (p a)
/-- `PrimrecRel p` means `p : α → β → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive relation, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → β → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecRel {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (s : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] :=
Primrec₂ fun a b => decide (s a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Primrec₂ f := hf
theorem of_eq {f g : α → β → σ} (hg : Primrec₂ f) (H : ∀ a b, f a b = g a b) : Primrec₂ g :=
(by funext a b; apply H : f = g) ▸ hg
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (_ : β) => x :=
Primrec.const _
protected theorem pair : Primrec₂ (@Prod.mk α β) :=
Primrec.pair .fst .snd
theorem left : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (_ : β) => a :=
.fst
theorem right : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (b : β) => b :=
.snd
theorem natPair : Primrec₂ Nat.pair := by simp [Primrec₂, Primrec]; constructor
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ → α} : Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.comp natPair, fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ} : Nat.Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
theorem encode_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => encode (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.encode_iff
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => some (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.option_some_iff
theorem ofNat_iff {α β σ} [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔ Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => f (ofNat α m) (ofNat β n) :=
(Primrec.ofNat_iff.trans <| by simp).trans unpaired
theorem uncurry {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec (Function.uncurry f) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
rw [show Function.uncurry f = fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 from funext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => rfl]; rfl
theorem curry {f : α × β → σ} : Primrec₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ Primrec f := by
rw [← uncurry, Function.uncurry_curry]
end Primrec₂
section Comp
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem Primrec.comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem Primrec₂.comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec h) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
Primrec.comp hf (hg.pair hh)
theorem Primrec₂.comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Primrec₂ f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
theorem PrimrecPred.comp {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α → β} :
PrimrecPred p → Primrec f → PrimrecPred fun a => p (f a) :=
Primrec.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp {R : β → γ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec f → Primrec g → PrimrecPred fun a => R (f a) (g a) :=
Primrec₂.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp₂ {R : γ → δ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β → γ}
{g : α → β → δ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec₂ f → Primrec₂ g → PrimrecRel fun a b => R (f a b) (g a b) :=
PrimrecRel.comp
end Comp
theorem PrimrecPred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) : PrimrecPred q :=
Primrec.of_eq hp fun a => Bool.decide_congr (H a)
theorem PrimrecRel.of_eq {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {r s : α → β → Prop}
[∀ a b, Decidable (r a b)] [∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] (hr : PrimrecRel r)
(H : ∀ a b, r a b ↔ s a b) : PrimrecRel s :=
Primrec₂.of_eq hr fun a b => Bool.decide_congr (H a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem swap {f : α → β → σ} (h : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec₂ (swap f) :=
h.comp₂ Primrec₂.right Primrec₂.left
theorem nat_iff {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec₂ f ↔ Nat.Primrec
(.unpaired fun m n => encode <| (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) := by
have :
∀ (a : Option α) (b : Option β),
Option.map (fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2)
(Option.bind a fun a : α => Option.map (Prod.mk a) b) =
Option.bind a fun a => Option.map (f a) b := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
simp [Primrec₂, Primrec, this]
theorem nat_iff' {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔
Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => Option.map (f a) (@decode β _ n) :=
nat_iff.trans <| unpaired'.trans encode_iff
end Primrec₂
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun _ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ × β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => n.rec (motive := fun _ => β) (f a) fun n IH => g a (n, IH) :=
Primrec₂.nat_iff.2 <|
((Nat.Primrec.casesOn' .zero <|
(Nat.Primrec.prec hf <|
.comp hg <|
Nat.Primrec.left.pair <|
(Nat.Primrec.left.comp .right).pair <|
Nat.Primrec.pred.comp <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp .right).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.right.pair <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp Nat.Primrec.left).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.id.pair <| (@Primcodable.prim α).comp Nat.Primrec.left).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, id_eq, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val, decode_nat,
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map, Option.map_some']
rcases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with - | a; · rfl
simp only [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one, encode_some, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, encodek, Option.map_some',
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map]
induction' n.unpair.2 with m <;> simp [encodek]
simp [*, encodek]
theorem nat_rec' {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ × β → β}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).rec (motive := fun _ => β) (g a) fun n IH => h a (n, IH) :=
(nat_rec hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_rec₁ {f : ℕ → α → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec (Nat.rec a f) :=
nat_rec' .id (const a) <| comp₂ hf Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn (f a) (g a) : β) :=
nat_rec hf <| hg.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| comp₂ fst Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => ((f a).casesOn (g a) (h a) : β) :=
(nat_casesOn' hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_casesOn₁ {f : ℕ → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec f) :
Primrec (fun (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn a f : α)) :=
nat_casesOn .id (const a) (comp₂ hf .right)
theorem nat_iterate {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => (h a)^[f a] (g a) :=
(nat_rec' hf hg (hh.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq fun a => by
induction f a <;> simp [*, -Function.iterate_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Primrec o)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
encode_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (encode_iff.2 hf) <|
pred.comp₂ <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.2 <|
(Primrec₂.nat_iff'.1 hg).comp₂ ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp fst).to₂
Primrec₂.right).of_eq
fun a => by rcases o a with - | b <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_bind₁ {f : α → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun o => Option.bind o f :=
option_bind .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)).of_eq fun x => by cases f x <;> rfl
theorem option_map₁ {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec (Option.map f) :=
option_map .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_iget [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@Option.iget α _) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const <| @default α _) .right).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_isSome : Primrec (@Option.isSome α) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const false) (const true).to₂).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_getD : Primrec₂ (@Option.getD α) :=
Primrec.of_eq (option_casesOn Primrec₂.left Primrec₂.right .right) fun ⟨o, a⟩ => by
cases o <;> rfl
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).bind (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [encodek] using h.comp fst ((@Primrec.encode β _).comp snd), fun h =>
option_bind (Primrec.decode.comp snd) <| h.comp (fst.comp fst) snd⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
simp only [Option.map_eq_bind]
exact bind_decode_iff.trans Primrec₂.option_some_iff
theorem nat_add : Primrec₂ ((· + ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.add
theorem nat_sub : Primrec₂ ((· - ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.sub
theorem nat_mul : Primrec₂ ((· * ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.mul
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Primrec c) (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => bif (c a) then (f a) else (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem ite {c : α → Prop} [DecidablePred c] {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : PrimrecPred c)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => if c a then f a else g a := by
simpa [Bool.cond_decide] using cond hc hf hg
theorem nat_le : PrimrecRel ((· ≤ ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_casesOn nat_sub (const true) (const false).to₂).of_eq fun p => by
dsimp [swap]
rcases e : p.1 - p.2 with - | n
· simp [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 e]
· simp [not_le.2 (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e)]
theorem nat_min : Primrec₂ (@min ℕ _) :=
ite nat_le fst snd
theorem nat_max : Primrec₂ (@max ℕ _) :=
ite (nat_le.comp fst snd) snd fst
theorem dom_bool (f : Bool → α) : Primrec f :=
(cond .id (const (f true)) (const (f false))).of_eq fun b => by cases b <;> rfl
theorem dom_bool₂ (f : Bool → Bool → α) : Primrec₂ f :=
(cond fst ((dom_bool (f true)).comp snd) ((dom_bool (f false)).comp snd)).of_eq fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
cases a <;> rfl
protected theorem not : Primrec not :=
dom_bool _
protected theorem and : Primrec₂ and :=
dom_bool₂ _
protected theorem or : Primrec₂ or :=
dom_bool₂ _
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.not {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) :
PrimrecPred fun a => ¬p a :=
(Primrec.not.comp hp).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.and {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∧ q a :=
(Primrec.and.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.or {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∨ q a :=
(Primrec.or.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem beq [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@BEq.beq α _) :=
have : PrimrecRel fun a b : ℕ => a = b :=
(PrimrecPred.and nat_le nat_le.swap).of_eq fun a => by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
(this.comp₂ (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
fun _ _ => encode_injective.eq_iff
protected theorem eq [DecidableEq α] : PrimrecRel (@Eq α) := Primrec.beq
theorem nat_lt : PrimrecRel ((· < ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_le.comp snd fst).not.of_eq fun p => by simp
theorem option_guard {p : α → β → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (p a b)] (hp : PrimrecRel p) {f : α → β}
(hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun a => Option.guard (p a) (f a) :=
ite (hp.comp Primrec.id hf) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (const none)
theorem option_orElse : Primrec₂ ((· <|> ·) : Option α → Option α → Option α) :=
(option_casesOn fst snd (fst.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun ⟨o₁, o₂⟩ => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> rfl
protected theorem decode₂ : Primrec (decode₂ α) :=
option_bind .decode <|
option_guard (Primrec.beq.comp₂ (by exact encode_iff.mpr snd) (by exact fst.comp fst)) snd
theorem list_findIdx₁ {p : α → β → Bool} (hp : Primrec₂ p) :
∀ l : List β, Primrec fun a => l.findIdx (p a)
| [] => const 0
| a :: l => (cond (hp.comp .id (const a)) (const 0) (succ.comp (list_findIdx₁ hp l))).of_eq fun n =>
by simp [List.findIdx_cons]
theorem list_idxOf₁ [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) : Primrec fun a => l.idxOf a :=
list_findIdx₁ (.swap .beq) l
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias list_indexOf₁ := list_idxOf₁
theorem dom_fintype [Finite α] (f : α → σ) : Primrec f :=
let ⟨l, _, m⟩ := Finite.exists_univ_list α
option_some_iff.1 <| by
haveI := decidableEqOfEncodable α
refine ((list_getElem?₁ (l.map f)).comp (list_idxOf₁ l)).of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_idxOf (m a), Option.map_some']
-- Porting note: These are new lemmas
-- I added it because it actually simplified the proofs
-- and because I couldn't understand the original proof
/-- A function is `PrimrecBounded` if its size is bounded by a primitive recursive function -/
def PrimrecBounded (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → ℕ, Primrec g ∧ ∀ x, encode (f x) ≤ g x
theorem nat_findGreatest {f : α → ℕ} {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x n, Decidable (p x n)]
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : PrimrecRel p) : Primrec fun x => (f x).findGreatest (p x) :=
(nat_rec' (h := fun x nih => if p x (nih.1 + 1) then nih.1 + 1 else nih.2)
hf (const 0) (ite (hp.comp fst (snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp))
(snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp) (snd.comp snd))).of_eq fun x => by
induction f x <;> simp [Nat.findGreatest, *]
/-- To show a function `f : α → ℕ` is primitive recursive, it is enough to show that the function
is bounded by a primitive recursive function and that its graph is primitive recursive -/
theorem of_graph {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : PrimrecBounded f)
(h₂ : PrimrecRel fun a b => f a = b) : Primrec f := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨g, pg, hg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x⟩
refine (nat_findGreatest pg h₂).of_eq fun n => ?_
exact (Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun b => f n = b) (hg n) rfl).symm
-- We show that division is primitive recursive by showing that the graph is
theorem nat_div : Primrec₂ ((· / ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) := by
refine of_graph ⟨_, fst, fun p => Nat.div_le_self _ _⟩ ?_
have : PrimrecRel fun (a : ℕ × ℕ) (b : ℕ) => (a.2 = 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨
(0 < a.2 ∧ b * a.2 ≤ a.1 ∧ a.1 < (b + 1) * a.2) :=
PrimrecPred.or
(.and (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp (fst |> snd.comp)) (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp snd))
(.and (nat_lt.comp (const 0) (fst |> snd.comp)) <|
.and (nat_le.comp (nat_mul.comp snd (fst |> snd.comp)) (fst |> fst.comp))
(nat_lt.comp (fst.comp fst) (nat_mul.comp (Primrec.succ.comp snd) (snd.comp fst))))
refine this.of_eq ?_
rintro ⟨a, k⟩ q
if H : k = 0 then simp [H, eq_comm]
else
have : q * k ≤ a ∧ a < (q + 1) * k ↔ q = a / k := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← (@Nat.lt_succ _ q), Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H),
Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H)]
simpa [H, zero_lt_iff, eq_comm (b := q)]
theorem nat_mod : Primrec₂ ((· % ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
(nat_sub.comp fst (nat_mul.comp snd nat_div)).to₂.of_eq fun m n => by
apply Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add
simp [add_comm (m % n), Nat.div_add_mod]
theorem nat_bodd : Primrec Nat.bodd :=
(Primrec.beq.comp (nat_mod.comp .id (const 2)) (const 1)).of_eq fun n => by
cases H : n.bodd <;> simp [Nat.mod_two_of_bodd, H]
theorem nat_div2 : Primrec Nat.div2 :=
(nat_div.comp .id (const 2)).of_eq fun n => n.div2_val.symm
theorem nat_double : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n) :=
nat_mul.comp (const _) Primrec.id
theorem nat_double_succ : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n + 1) :=
nat_double |> Primrec.succ.comp
end Primrec
section
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
variable (H : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (@decode (List β) _ n))
open Primrec
private def prim : Primcodable (List β) := ⟨H⟩
private theorem list_casesOn' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
letI := prim H
have :
@Primrec _ (Option σ) _ _ fun a =>
| (@decode (Option (β × List β)) _ (encode (f a))).map fun o => Option.casesOn o (g a) (h a) :=
((@map_decode_iff _ (Option (β × List β)) _ _ _ _ _).2 <|
to₂ <|
| Mathlib/Computability/Primrec.lean | 735 | 737 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
· apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1)
· rw [Nat.floor_of_nonpos]
· omega
· linarith
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊
have t1 : -s.re < n := by simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
have t2 : -(s + 1).re < n := by rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [Gamma_eq_GammaAux s n t1, Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s + 1) n t2, GammaAux_recurrence1 s n t1]
field_simp
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = GammaIntegral s :=
Gamma_eq_GammaAux s 0 (by norm_cast; linarith)
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by rw [Gamma_eq_integral] <;> simp
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
rw [Gamma_add_one n.succ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n]
simp only [Nat.cast_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]
congr
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℂ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [Gamma, zero_re, sub_zero, Nat.floor_one, GammaAux, div_zero]
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value 0. -/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Gamma_zero]
| succ n IH =>
have A : -(n.succ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : -(n : ℂ) = -↑n.succ + 1 := by simp
rw [this, Gamma_add_one _ A] at IH
contrapose! IH
exact mul_ne_zero A IH
theorem Gamma_conj (s : ℂ) : Gamma (conj s) = conj (Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : ℂ), GammaAux n (conj s) = conj (GammaAux n s) by
simp [Gamma, this]
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rw [GammaAux]; exact GammaIntegral_conj
| succ n IH =>
intro s
rw [GammaAux]
dsimp only
rw [div_eq_mul_inv _ s, RingHom.map_mul, conj_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
suffices conj s + 1 = conj (s + 1) by rw [this, IH]
rw [RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_one]
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))` in terms of the Gamma
function, for complex `a`. -/
lemma integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
have aux : (1 / r : ℂ) ^ a = 1 / r * (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← cpow_one (1 / r : ℂ)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (one_div_ne_zero <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hr.ne'), add_sub_cancel]
calc
_ = ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * (r * t) ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) := by
refine MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hr.le hx.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, ← ofReal_inv,
← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg (inv_pos.mpr hr).le hr.le, ← ofReal_mul r⁻¹,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr.ne', ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_mul]
_ = 1 / r * ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t) := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul]
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x ↦ _ * x ^ (a - 1) * exp (-x)) _ hr, mul_zero,
real_smul, ← one_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
_ = 1 / r * (1 / r : ℂ) ^ (a - 1) * (∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t)) := by
simp_rw [← MeasureTheory.integral_const_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [aux, Gamma_eq_integral ha]
congr 2 with x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, mul_comm]
end GammaDef
end Complex
namespace Real
/-- The `Γ` function (of a real variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
def Gamma (s : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Complex.Gamma s).re
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
Gamma s = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.Gamma_eq_integral (by rwa [Complex.ofReal_re] : 0 < Complex.re s)]
dsimp only [Complex.GammaIntegral]
simp_rw [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_sub]
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ↑(exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ ((s - 1 : ℝ) : ℂ) =
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ((exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ) : ℂ) by
have cc : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
conv_lhs => rw [this]; enter [1, 2, x]; rw [cc]
rw [_root_.integral_ofReal, ← cc, Complex.ofReal_re]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow (le_of_lt hx)]
push_cast; rfl
theorem Gamma_add_one {s : ℝ} (hs : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
simp_rw [Gamma]
rw [Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_add_one, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
rwa [Complex.ofReal_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_one, Complex.one_re]
theorem _root_.Complex.Gamma_ofReal (s : ℝ) : Complex.Gamma (s : ℂ) = Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_re, ← Complex.Gamma_conj, Complex.conj_ofReal]
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_one,
Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ← Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℝ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.Gamma_ofReal, Complex.ofReal_inj] using
Complex.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`.
-/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_natCast, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.Gamma_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] using Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero n
theorem Gamma_pos_of_pos {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) : 0 < Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
have : (Function.support fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) ∩ Ioi 0 = Ioi 0 := by
rw [inter_eq_right]
intro x hx
rw [Function.mem_support]
exact mul_ne_zero (exp_pos _).ne' (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).ne'
rw [setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [this, volume_Ioi, ← ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
· refine eventually_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) ?_
exact fun x hx => (mul_pos (exp_pos _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)).le
· exact GammaIntegral_convergent hs
theorem Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) : 0 ≤ Gamma s := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_lt_of_le hs
· rw [Gamma_zero]
· exact (Gamma_pos_of_pos h).le
open Complex in
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))`, for positive real `r`,
in terms of the Gamma function. -/
lemma integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ t : ℝ in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, ← Gamma_ofReal, ofReal_cpow (by positivity), ofReal_div]
convert integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi (by rwa [ofReal_re] : 0 < (a : ℂ).re) hr
refine integral_ofReal.symm.trans <| setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
norm_cast
simp_rw [← ofReal_cpow ht.le, RCLike.ofReal_mul, coe_algebraMap]
open Lean.Meta Qq Mathlib.Meta.Positivity in
/-- The `positivity` extension which identifies expressions of the form `Gamma a`. -/
@[positivity Gamma (_ : ℝ)]
def _root_.Mathlib.Meta.Positivity.evalGamma : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Gamma $a) =>
match ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a with
| .positive pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Gamma_pos_of_pos $pa))
| .nonnegative pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg $pa))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "failed to match on Gamma application"
/-- The Gamma function does not vanish on `ℝ` (except at non-positive integers, where the function
is mathematically undefined and we set it to `0` by convention). -/
theorem Gamma_ne_zero {s : ℝ} (hs : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) : Gamma s ≠ 0 := by
suffices ∀ {n : ℕ}, -(n : ℝ) < s → Gamma s ≠ 0 by
apply this
swap
· exact ⌊-s⌋₊ + 1
rw [neg_lt, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact Nat.lt_floor_add_one _
intro n
induction n generalizing s with
| zero =>
intro hs
refine (Gamma_pos_of_pos ?_).ne'
rwa [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero] at hs
| succ _ n_ih =>
intro hs'
have : Gamma (s + 1) ≠ 0 := by
apply n_ih
· intro m
specialize hs (1 + m)
contrapose! hs
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hs
rw [hs]
push_cast
ring
· rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add] at hs'
linarith
rw [Gamma_add_one, mul_ne_zero_iff] at this
· exact this.2
· simpa using hs 0
theorem Gamma_eq_zero_iff (s : ℝ) : Gamma s = 0 ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, s = -m :=
⟨by contrapose!; exact Gamma_ne_zero, by rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩; exact Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero m⟩
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 551 | 553 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
/-!
# Towers of algebras
In this file we prove basic facts about towers of algebra.
An algebra tower A/S/R is expressed by having instances of `Algebra A S`,
`Algebra R S`, `Algebra R A` and `IsScalarTower R S A`, the later asserting the
compatibility condition `(r • s) • a = r • (s • a)`.
An important definition is `toAlgHom R S A`, the canonical `R`-algebra homomorphism `S →ₐ[R] A`.
-/
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁ v₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁) (M : Type v₁)
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [Module B M]
variable [IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower R B M] [SMulCommClass A B M]
variable {A}
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A → End (M)` corresponding to the representation of the algebra `A`
on the `B`-module `M`.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toLinearMap`, and could also have been
called `Algebra.toModuleEnd`.
The typeclasses correspond to the situation where the types act on each other as
```
R ----→ B
| ⟍ |
| ⟍ |
↓ ↘ ↓
A ----→ M
```
where the diagram commutes, the action by `R` commutes with everything, and the action by `A` and
`B` on `M` commute.
Typically this is most useful with `B = R` as `Algebra.lsmul R R A : A →ₐ[R] Module.End R M`.
However this can be used to get the fact that left-multiplication by `A` is right `A`-linear, and
vice versa, as
```lean
example : A →ₐ[R] Module.End Aᵐᵒᵖ A := Algebra.lsmul R Aᵐᵒᵖ A
example : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₐ[R] Module.End A A := Algebra.lsmul R A A
```
respectively; though `LinearMap.mulLeft` and `LinearMap.mulRight` can also be used here.
-/
def lsmul : A →ₐ[R] Module.End B M where
toFun := DistribMulAction.toLinearMap B M
map_one' := LinearMap.ext fun _ => one_smul A _
map_mul' a b := LinearMap.ext <| smul_assoc a b
map_zero' := LinearMap.ext fun _ => zero_smul A _
map_add' _a _b := LinearMap.ext fun _ => add_smul _ _ _
commutes' r := LinearMap.ext <| algebraMap_smul A r
@[simp]
theorem lsmul_coe (a : A) : (lsmul R B M a : M → M) = (a • ·) := rfl
end Algebra
namespace IsScalarTower
section Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [MulAction A M]
variable {R} {M}
theorem algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R A M] (r : R) (x : M) :
algebraMap R A r • x = r • x := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
variable {A} in
theorem of_algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] (h : ∀ (r : R) (x : M), algebraMap R A r • x = r • x) :
IsScalarTower R A M where
smul_assoc r a x := by rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul, h]
variable (R M) in
theorem of_compHom : letI := MulAction.compHom M (algebraMap R A : R →* A); IsScalarTower R A M :=
letI := MulAction.compHom M (algebraMap R A : R →* A); of_algebraMap_smul fun _ _ ↦ rfl
end Module
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B]
variable {R S A}
theorem of_algebraMap_eq [Algebra R A]
(h : ∀ x, algebraMap R A x = algebraMap S A (algebraMap R S x)) : IsScalarTower R S A :=
⟨fun x y z => by simp_rw [Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, h]⟩
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem of_algebraMap_eq' [Algebra R A]
(h : algebraMap R A = (algebraMap S A).comp (algebraMap R S)) : IsScalarTower R S A :=
of_algebraMap_eq <| RingHom.ext_iff.1 h
variable (R S A)
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R A = (algebraMap S A).comp (algebraMap R S) :=
RingHom.ext fun x => by
simp_rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_apply (x : R) : algebraMap R A x = algebraMap S A (algebraMap R S x) := by
rw [algebraMap_eq R S A, RingHom.comp_apply]
@[ext]
theorem Algebra.ext {S : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] (h1 h2 : Algebra S A)
(h : ∀ (r : S) (x : A), (by have I := h1; exact r • x) = r • x) : h1 = h2 :=
Algebra.algebra_ext _ _ fun r => by
simpa only [@Algebra.smul_def _ _ _ _ h1, @Algebra.smul_def _ _ _ _ h2, mul_one] using h r 1
/-- In a tower, the canonical map from the middle element to the top element is an
algebra homomorphism over the bottom element. -/
def toAlgHom : S →ₐ[R] A :=
{ algebraMap S A with commutes' := fun _ => (algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm }
|
theorem toAlgHom_apply (y : S) : toAlgHom R S A y = algebraMap S A y := rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Tower.lean | 135 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Adjunction
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.IsTerminal
/-!
# Limits and colimits in the category of (co)algebras
This file shows that the forgetful functor `forget T : Algebra T ⥤ C` for a monad `T : C ⥤ C`
creates limits and creates any colimits which `T` preserves.
This is used to show that `Algebra T` has any limits which `C` has, and any colimits which `C` has
and `T` preserves.
This is generalised to the case of a monadic functor `D ⥤ C`.
Dually, this file shows that the forgetful functor `forget T : Coalgebra T ⥤ C` for a
comonad `T : C ⥤ C` creates colimits and creates any limits which `T` preserves.
This is used to show that `Coalgebra T` has any colimits which `C` has, and any limits which `C` has
and `T` preserves.
This is generalised to the case of a comonadic functor `D ⥤ C`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [category_theory universes].
namespace Monad
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {T : Monad C}
variable {J : Type u} [Category.{v} J]
namespace ForgetCreatesLimits
variable (D : J ⥤ Algebra T) (c : Cone (D ⋙ T.forget)) (t : IsLimit c)
/-- (Impl) The natural transformation used to define the new cone -/
@[simps]
def γ : D ⋙ T.forget ⋙ ↑T ⟶ D ⋙ T.forget where app j := (D.obj j).a
/-- (Impl) This new cone is used to construct the algebra structure -/
@[simps! π_app]
def newCone : Cone (D ⋙ forget T) where
pt := T.obj c.pt
π := (Functor.constComp _ _ (T : C ⥤ C)).inv ≫ whiskerRight c.π (T : C ⥤ C) ≫ γ D
/-- The algebra structure which will be the apex of the new limit cone for `D`. -/
@[simps]
def conePoint : Algebra T where
A := c.pt
a := t.lift (newCone D c)
unit :=
t.hom_ext fun j => by
rw [Category.assoc, t.fac, newCone_π_app, ← T.η.naturality_assoc, Functor.id_map,
(D.obj j).unit]
dsimp; simp
-- See library note [dsimp, simp]
assoc :=
t.hom_ext fun j => by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, t.fac (newCone D c), newCone_π_app, ←
Functor.map_comp_assoc, t.fac (newCone D c), newCone_π_app, ← T.μ.naturality_assoc,
(D.obj j).assoc, Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
rfl
/-- (Impl) Construct the lifted cone in `Algebra T` which will be limiting. -/
@[simps]
def liftedCone : Cone D where
pt := conePoint D c t
π :=
{ app := fun j => { f := c.π.app j }
naturality := fun X Y f => by
ext1
dsimp
erw [c.w f]
simp }
/-- (Impl) Prove that the lifted cone is limiting. -/
@[simps]
def liftedConeIsLimit : IsLimit (liftedCone D c t) where
lift s :=
{ f := t.lift ((forget T).mapCone s)
h :=
t.hom_ext fun j => by
dsimp
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, t.fac, newCone_π_app, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
t.fac, Functor.mapCone_π_app]
apply (s.π.app j).h }
uniq s m J := by
ext1
apply t.hom_ext
intro j
simpa [t.fac ((forget T).mapCone s) j] using congr_arg Algebra.Hom.f (J j)
end ForgetCreatesLimits
-- Theorem 5.6.5 from [Riehl][riehl2017]
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category creates limits. -/
noncomputable instance forgetCreatesLimits : CreatesLimitsOfSize (forget T) where
CreatesLimitsOfShape := {
CreatesLimit := fun {D} =>
createsLimitOfReflectsIso fun c t =>
{ liftedCone := ForgetCreatesLimits.liftedCone D c t
validLift := Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun _ => (id_comp _).symm
makesLimit := ForgetCreatesLimits.liftedConeIsLimit _ _ _ } }
/-- `D ⋙ forget T` has a limit, then `D` has a limit. -/
theorem hasLimit_of_comp_forget_hasLimit (D : J ⥤ Algebra T) [HasLimit (D ⋙ forget T)] :
HasLimit D :=
hasLimit_of_created D (forget T)
namespace ForgetCreatesColimits
-- Let's hide the implementation details in a namespace
variable {D : J ⥤ Algebra T} (c : Cocone (D ⋙ forget T)) (t : IsColimit c)
-- We have a diagram D of shape J in the category of algebras, and we assume that we are given a
-- colimit for its image D ⋙ forget T under the forgetful functor, say its point is L.
-- We'll construct a colimiting coalgebra for D, whose carrier will also be L.
-- To do this, we must find a map TL ⟶ L. Since T preserves colimits, TL is also a colimit.
-- In particular, it is a colimit for the diagram `(D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T`
-- so to construct a map TL ⟶ L it suffices to show that L is the point of a cocone for this
-- diagram. In other words, we need a natural transformation from const L to `(D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T`.
-- But we already know that L is the point of a cocone for the diagram `D ⋙ forget T`, so it
-- suffices to give a natural transformation `((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T) ⟶ (D ⋙ forget T)`:
/-- (Impl)
The natural transformation given by the algebra structure maps, used to construct a cocone `c` with
point `colimit (D ⋙ forget T)`.
-/
@[simps]
def γ : (D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T ⟶ D ⋙ forget T where app j := (D.obj j).a
/-- (Impl)
A cocone for the diagram `(D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ T` found by composing the natural transformation `γ`
with the colimiting cocone for `D ⋙ forget T`.
-/
@[simps]
def newCocone : Cocone ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ (T : C ⥤ C)) where
pt := c.pt
ι := γ ≫ c.ι
variable [PreservesColimit (D ⋙ forget T) (T : C ⥤ C)]
/-- (Impl)
Define the map `λ : TL ⟶ L`, which will serve as the structure of the coalgebra on `L`, and
we will show is the colimiting object. We use the cocone constructed by `c` and the fact that
`T` preserves colimits to produce this morphism.
-/
noncomputable abbrev lambda : ((T : C ⥤ C).mapCocone c).pt ⟶ c.pt :=
(isColimitOfPreserves _ t).desc (newCocone c)
/-- (Impl) The key property defining the map `λ : TL ⟶ L`. -/
theorem commuting (j : J) : (T : C ⥤ C).map (c.ι.app j) ≫ lambda c t = (D.obj j).a ≫ c.ι.app j :=
(isColimitOfPreserves _ t).fac (newCocone c) j
variable [PreservesColimit ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T) (T : C ⥤ C)]
/-- (Impl)
Construct the colimiting algebra from the map `λ : TL ⟶ L` given by `lambda`. We are required to
show it satisfies the two algebra laws, which follow from the algebra laws for the image of `D` and
our `commuting` lemma.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coconePoint : Algebra T where
A := c.pt
a := lambda c t
unit := by
apply t.hom_ext
intro j
rw [show c.ι.app j ≫ T.η.app c.pt ≫ _ = T.η.app (D.obj j).A ≫ _ ≫ _ from
T.η.naturality_assoc _ _,
commuting, Algebra.unit_assoc (D.obj j)]
dsimp; simp
-- See library note [dsimp, simp]
assoc := by
refine (isColimitOfPreserves _ (isColimitOfPreserves _ t)).hom_ext fun j => ?_
rw [Functor.mapCocone_ι_app, Functor.mapCocone_ι_app,
show (T : C ⥤ C).map ((T : C ⥤ C).map _) ≫ _ ≫ _ = _ from T.μ.naturality_assoc _ _, ←
Functor.map_comp_assoc, commuting, Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc, commuting]
apply (D.obj j).assoc_assoc _
/-- (Impl) Construct the lifted cocone in `Algebra T` which will be colimiting. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def liftedCocone : Cocone D where
pt := coconePoint c t
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
{ f := c.ι.app j
h := commuting _ _ _ }
naturality := fun A B f => by
ext1
dsimp
rw [comp_id]
apply c.w }
/-- (Impl) Prove that the lifted cocone is colimiting. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def liftedCoconeIsColimit : IsColimit (liftedCocone c t) where
desc s :=
{ f := t.desc ((forget T).mapCocone s)
h :=
(isColimitOfPreserves (T : C ⥤ C) t).hom_ext fun j => by
dsimp
rw [← Functor.map_comp_assoc, ← Category.assoc, t.fac, commuting, Category.assoc, t.fac]
apply Algebra.Hom.h }
uniq s m J := by
ext1
apply t.hom_ext
intro j
simpa using congr_arg Algebra.Hom.f (J j)
end ForgetCreatesColimits
open ForgetCreatesColimits
-- TODO: the converse of this is true as well
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category for a monad creates any colimit
which the monad itself preserves.
-/
noncomputable instance forgetCreatesColimit (D : J ⥤ Algebra T)
[PreservesColimit (D ⋙ forget T) (T : C ⥤ C)]
[PreservesColimit ((D ⋙ forget T) ⋙ ↑T) (T : C ⥤ C)] : CreatesColimit D (forget T) :=
createsColimitOfReflectsIso fun c t =>
{ liftedCocone :=
{ pt := coconePoint c t
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
{ f := c.ι.app j
h := commuting _ _ _ }
naturality := fun A B f => by
ext1
dsimp
erw [comp_id, c.w] } }
validLift := Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _)
makesColimit := liftedCoconeIsColimit _ _ }
noncomputable instance forgetCreatesColimitsOfShape [PreservesColimitsOfShape J (T : C ⥤ C)] :
CreatesColimitsOfShape J (forget T) where CreatesColimit := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance forgetCreatesColimits [PreservesColimitsOfSize.{v, u} (T : C ⥤ C)] :
CreatesColimitsOfSize.{v, u} (forget T) where CreatesColimitsOfShape := by infer_instance
/-- For `D : J ⥤ Algebra T`, `D ⋙ forget T` has a colimit, then `D` has a colimit provided colimits
of shape `J` are preserved by `T`.
-/
theorem forget_creates_colimits_of_monad_preserves [PreservesColimitsOfShape J (T : C ⥤ C)]
(D : J ⥤ Algebra T) [HasColimit (D ⋙ forget T)] : HasColimit D :=
hasColimit_of_created D (forget T)
end Monad
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
variable {J : Type u} [Category.{v} J]
instance comp_comparison_forget_hasLimit (F : J ⥤ D) (R : D ⥤ C) [MonadicRightAdjoint R]
[HasLimit (F ⋙ R)] :
HasLimit ((F ⋙ Monad.comparison (monadicAdjunction R)) ⋙ Monad.forget _) := by
assumption
instance comp_comparison_hasLimit (F : J ⥤ D) (R : D ⥤ C) [MonadicRightAdjoint R]
[HasLimit (F ⋙ R)] : HasLimit (F ⋙ Monad.comparison (monadicAdjunction R)) :=
Monad.hasLimit_of_comp_forget_hasLimit (F ⋙ Monad.comparison (monadicAdjunction R))
/-- Any monadic functor creates limits. -/
noncomputable def monadicCreatesLimits (R : D ⥤ C) [MonadicRightAdjoint R] :
CreatesLimitsOfSize.{v, u} R :=
createsLimitsOfNatIso (Monad.comparisonForget (monadicAdjunction R))
/-- The forgetful functor from the Eilenberg-Moore category for a monad creates any colimit
which the monad itself preserves.
-/
noncomputable def monadicCreatesColimitOfPreservesColimit (R : D ⥤ C) (K : J ⥤ D)
[MonadicRightAdjoint R] [PreservesColimit (K ⋙ R) (monadicLeftAdjoint R ⋙ R)]
[PreservesColimit ((K ⋙ R) ⋙ monadicLeftAdjoint R ⋙ R) (monadicLeftAdjoint R ⋙ R)] :
CreatesColimit K R := by
-- Porting note: It would be nice to have a variant of apply which introduces goals for missing
-- instances.
letI A := Monad.comparison (monadicAdjunction R)
letI B := Monad.forget (Adjunction.toMonad (monadicAdjunction R))
let i : (K ⋙ Monad.comparison (monadicAdjunction R)) ⋙ Monad.forget _ ≅ K ⋙ R :=
Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft K (Monad.comparisonForget (monadicAdjunction R))
letI : PreservesColimit ((K ⋙ A) ⋙ Monad.forget
(Adjunction.toMonad (monadicAdjunction R)))
(Adjunction.toMonad (monadicAdjunction R)).toFunctor := by
dsimp
exact preservesColimit_of_iso_diagram _ i.symm
letI : PreservesColimit
(((K ⋙ A) ⋙ Monad.forget (Adjunction.toMonad (monadicAdjunction R))) ⋙
(Adjunction.toMonad (monadicAdjunction R)).toFunctor)
(Adjunction.toMonad (monadicAdjunction R)).toFunctor := by
dsimp
exact preservesColimit_of_iso_diagram _ (isoWhiskerRight i (monadicLeftAdjoint R ⋙ R)).symm
letI : CreatesColimit (K ⋙ A) B := CategoryTheory.Monad.forgetCreatesColimit _
letI : CreatesColimit K (A ⋙ B) := CategoryTheory.compCreatesColimit _ _
let e := Monad.comparisonForget (monadicAdjunction R)
apply createsColimitOfNatIso e
/-- A monadic functor creates any colimits of shapes it preserves. -/
noncomputable def monadicCreatesColimitsOfShapeOfPreservesColimitsOfShape (R : D ⥤ C)
[MonadicRightAdjoint R] [PreservesColimitsOfShape J R] : CreatesColimitsOfShape J R :=
letI : PreservesColimitsOfShape J (monadicLeftAdjoint R) := by
apply (Adjunction.leftAdjoint_preservesColimits (monadicAdjunction R)).1
letI : PreservesColimitsOfShape J (monadicLeftAdjoint R ⋙ R) := by
apply CategoryTheory.Limits.comp_preservesColimitsOfShape _ _
⟨monadicCreatesColimitOfPreservesColimit _ _⟩
/-- A monadic functor creates colimits if it preserves colimits. -/
noncomputable def monadicCreatesColimitsOfPreservesColimits (R : D ⥤ C) [MonadicRightAdjoint R]
[PreservesColimitsOfSize.{v, u} R] : CreatesColimitsOfSize.{v, u} R where
CreatesColimitsOfShape :=
monadicCreatesColimitsOfShapeOfPreservesColimitsOfShape _
section
theorem hasLimit_of_reflective (F : J ⥤ D) (R : D ⥤ C) [HasLimit (F ⋙ R)] [Reflective R] :
HasLimit F :=
haveI := monadicCreatesLimits.{v, u} R
hasLimit_of_created F R
/-- If `C` has limits of shape `J` then any reflective subcategory has limits of shape `J`. -/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_reflective [HasLimitsOfShape J C] (R : D ⥤ C) [Reflective R] :
HasLimitsOfShape J D :=
⟨fun F => hasLimit_of_reflective F R⟩
/-- If `C` has limits then any reflective subcategory has limits. -/
theorem hasLimits_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [HasLimitsOfSize.{v, u} C] [Reflective R] :
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, u} D :=
⟨fun _ => hasLimitsOfShape_of_reflective R⟩
/-- If `C` has colimits of shape `J` then any reflective subcategory has colimits of shape `J`. -/
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [Reflective R] [HasColimitsOfShape J C] :
HasColimitsOfShape J D where
has_colimit := fun F => by
let c := (monadicLeftAdjoint R).mapCocone (colimit.cocone (F ⋙ R))
letI : PreservesColimitsOfShape J _ :=
(monadicAdjunction R).leftAdjoint_preservesColimits.1
let t : IsColimit c := isColimitOfPreserves (monadicLeftAdjoint R) (colimit.isColimit _)
apply HasColimit.mk ⟨_, (IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv _ _).symm t⟩
apply
(isoWhiskerLeft F (asIso (monadicAdjunction R).counit) :) ≪≫ F.rightUnitor
/-- If `C` has colimits then any reflective subcategory has colimits. -/
theorem hasColimits_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [Reflective R] [HasColimitsOfSize.{v, u} C] :
HasColimitsOfSize.{v, u} D :=
⟨fun _ => hasColimitsOfShape_of_reflective R⟩
/-- The reflector always preserves terminal objects. Note this in general doesn't apply to any other
limit.
-/
lemma leftAdjoint_preservesTerminal_of_reflective (R : D ⥤ C) [Reflective R] :
PreservesLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{v} PEmpty) (monadicLeftAdjoint R) where
preservesLimit {K} := by
let F := Functor.empty.{v} D
letI : PreservesLimit (F ⋙ R) (monadicLeftAdjoint R) := by
constructor
intro c h
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ R) := ⟨⟨⟨c, h⟩⟩⟩
haveI : HasLimit F := hasLimit_of_reflective F R
| constructor
apply isLimitChangeEmptyCone D (limit.isLimit F)
apply (asIso ((monadicAdjunction R).counit.app _)).symm.trans
apply (monadicLeftAdjoint R).mapIso
letI := monadicCreatesLimits.{v, v} R
let A := CategoryTheory.preservesLimit_of_createsLimit_and_hasLimit F R
apply (isLimitOfPreserves _ (limit.isLimit F)).conePointUniqueUpToIso h
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (Functor.emptyExt (F ⋙ R) _)
end
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monad/Limits.lean | 368 | 377 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,246 | 1,250 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
/-!
# Partial Equivalences
In this file, we define partial equivalences `PEquiv`, which are a bijection between a subset of `α`
and a subset of `β`. Notationally, a `PEquiv` is denoted by "`≃.`" (note that the full stop is part
of the notation). The way we store these internally is with two functions `f : α → Option β` and
the reverse function `g : β → Option α`, with the condition that if `f a` is `some b`,
then `g b` is `some a`.
## Main results
- `PEquiv.ofSet`: creates a `PEquiv` from a set `s`,
which sends an element to itself if it is in `s`.
- `PEquiv.single`: given two elements `a : α` and `b : β`, create a `PEquiv` that sends them to
each other, and ignores all other elements.
- `PEquiv.injective_of_forall_ne_isSome`/`injective_of_forall_isSome`: If the domain of a `PEquiv`
is all of `α` (except possibly one point), its `toFun` is injective.
## Canonical order
`PEquiv` is canonically ordered by inclusion; that is, if a function `f` defined on a subset `s`
is equal to `g` on that subset, but `g` is also defined on a larger set, then `f ≤ g`. We also have
a definition of `⊥`, which is the empty `PEquiv` (sends all to `none`), which in the end gives us a
`SemilatticeInf` with an `OrderBot` instance.
## Tags
pequiv, partial equivalence
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u v w x
/-- A `PEquiv` is a partial equivalence, a representation of a bijection between a subset
of `α` and a subset of `β`. See also `PartialEquiv` for a version that requires `toFun` and
`invFun` to be globally defined functions and has `source` and `target` sets as extra fields. -/
structure PEquiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
/-- The underlying partial function of a `PEquiv` -/
toFun : α → Option β
/-- The partial inverse of `toFun` -/
invFun : β → Option α
/-- `invFun` is the partial inverse of `toFun` -/
inv : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), a ∈ invFun b ↔ b ∈ toFun a
/-- A `PEquiv` is a partial equivalence, a representation of a bijection between a subset
of `α` and a subset of `β`. See also `PartialEquiv` for a version that requires `toFun` and
`invFun` to be globally defined functions and has `source` and `target` sets as extra fields. -/
infixr:25 " ≃. " => PEquiv
namespace PEquiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
open Function Option
instance : FunLike (α ≃. β) α (Option β) :=
{ coe := toFun
coe_injective' := by
rintro ⟨f₁, f₂, hf⟩ ⟨g₁, g₂, hg⟩ (rfl : f₁ = g₁)
congr with y x
simp only [hf, hg] }
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f₁ : α → Option β) (f₂ h) : (mk f₁ f₂ h : α → Option β) = f₁ :=
rfl
theorem coe_mk_apply (f₁ : α → Option β) (f₂ : β → Option α) (h) (x : α) :
(PEquiv.mk f₁ f₂ h : α → Option β) x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : α ≃. β} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- The identity map as a partial equivalence. -/
@[refl]
protected def refl (α : Type*) : α ≃. α where
toFun := some
invFun := some
inv _ _ := eq_comm
/-- The inverse partial equivalence. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (f : α ≃. β) : β ≃. α where
toFun := f.2
invFun := f.1
inv _ _ := (f.inv _ _).symm
theorem mem_iff_mem (f : α ≃. β) : ∀ {a : α} {b : β}, a ∈ f.symm b ↔ b ∈ f a :=
f.3 _ _
theorem eq_some_iff (f : α ≃. β) : ∀ {a : α} {b : β}, f.symm b = some a ↔ f a = some b :=
f.3 _ _
/-- Composition of partial equivalences `f : α ≃. β` and `g : β ≃. γ`. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) :
α ≃. γ where
toFun a := (f a).bind g
invFun a := (g.symm a).bind f.symm
inv a b := by simp_all [and_comm, eq_some_iff f, eq_some_iff g, bind_eq_some_iff]
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (a : α) : PEquiv.refl α a = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_refl : (PEquiv.refl α).symm = PEquiv.refl α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (f : α ≃. β) : f.symm.symm = f := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (PEquiv.symm : (α ≃. β) → β ≃. α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
theorem symm_injective : Function.Injective (@PEquiv.symm α β) :=
symm_bijective.injective
theorem trans_assoc (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (h : γ ≃. δ) :
(f.trans g).trans h = f.trans (g.trans h) :=
ext fun _ => Option.bind_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_trans (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) (c : γ) :
c ∈ f.trans g a ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ f a ∧ c ∈ g b :=
Option.bind_eq_some'
theorem trans_eq_some (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) (c : γ) :
f.trans g a = some c ↔ ∃ b, f a = some b ∧ g b = some c :=
Option.bind_eq_some'
theorem trans_eq_none (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) :
f.trans g a = none ↔ ∀ b c, b ∉ f a ∨ c ∉ g b := by
simp only [eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_trans, imp_iff_not_or.symm]
push_neg
exact forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (f : α ≃. β) : (PEquiv.refl α).trans f = f := by
ext; dsimp [PEquiv.trans]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (f : α ≃. β) : f.trans (PEquiv.refl β) = f := by
ext; dsimp [PEquiv.trans]; simp
protected theorem inj (f : α ≃. β) {a₁ a₂ : α} {b : β} (h₁ : b ∈ f a₁) (h₂ : b ∈ f a₂) :
a₁ = a₂ := by rw [← mem_iff_mem] at *; cases h : f.symm b <;> simp_all
/-- If the domain of a `PEquiv` is `α` except a point, its forward direction is injective. -/
theorem injective_of_forall_ne_isSome (f : α ≃. β) (a₂ : α)
(h : ∀ a₁ : α, a₁ ≠ a₂ → isSome (f a₁)) : Injective f :=
HasLeftInverse.injective
⟨fun b => Option.recOn b a₂ fun b' => Option.recOn (f.symm b') a₂ id, fun x => by
classical
cases hfx : f x
· have : x = a₂ := not_imp_comm.1 (h x) (hfx.symm ▸ by simp)
simp [this]
· dsimp only
rw [(eq_some_iff f).2 hfx]
rfl⟩
/-- If the domain of a `PEquiv` is all of `α`, its forward direction is injective. -/
| theorem injective_of_forall_isSome {f : α ≃. β} (h : ∀ a : α, isSome (f a)) : Injective f :=
(Classical.em (Nonempty α)).elim
| Mathlib/Data/PEquiv.lean | 174 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LinearMapPiProd
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Basic
/-!
# Continuous multilinear maps
We define continuous multilinear maps as maps from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂` which are multilinear
and continuous, by extending the space of multilinear maps with a continuity assumption.
Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type, and all these
spaces are also topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of continuous multilinear maps from
`(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`. We show that it is an `R`-module.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API of multilinear maps.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `M [×n]→L[R] M'` for the space of continuous `n`-multilinear maps from
`M^n` to `M'`. This is a particular case of the general notion (where we allow varying dependent
types as the arguments of our continuous multilinear maps), but arguably the most important one,
especially when defining iterated derivatives.
-/
open Function Fin Set
universe u v w w₁ w₁' w₂ w₃ w₄
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type v} {n : ℕ} {M : Fin n.succ → Type w} {M₁ : ι → Type w₁}
{M₁' : ι → Type w₁'} {M₂ : Type w₂} {M₃ : Type w₃} {M₄ : Type w₄}
/-- Continuous multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂`
are modules over `R` with a topological structure. In applications, there will be compatibility
conditions between the algebraic and the topological structures, but this is not needed for the
definition. -/
structure ContinuousMultilinearMap (R : Type u) {ι : Type v} (M₁ : ι → Type w₁) (M₂ : Type w₂)
[Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] extends MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
cont : Continuous toFun
attribute [inherit_doc ContinuousMultilinearMap] ContinuousMultilinearMap.cont
@[inherit_doc]
notation:25 M " [×" n "]→L[" R "] " M' => ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun i : Fin n => M) M'
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
[Module R M₄] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁' i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [TopologicalSpace M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₄]
(f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
theorem toMultilinearMap_injective :
Function.Injective
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
| ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, h => by subst h; rfl
instance funLike : FunLike (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' _ _ h := toMultilinearMap_injective <| MultilinearMap.coe_injective h
instance continuousMapClass :
ContinuousMapClass (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
map_continuous := ContinuousMultilinearMap.cont
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (L₁ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (v : ∀ i, M₁ i) : M₂ :=
L₁ v
initialize_simps_projections ContinuousMultilinearMap (-toMultilinearMap,
toMultilinearMap_toFun → apply)
@[continuity]
theorem coe_continuous : Continuous (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
f.cont
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe : (f.toMultilinearMap : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) = f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
@[simp]
theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_update_add' m i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")]
protected alias map_add := ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_add
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' m i c x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")]
protected alias map_smul := ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_smul
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ∀ i, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero i h
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_zero
instance : Zero (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨{ (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) with cont := continuous_const }⟩
instance : Inhabited (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) m = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultilinearMap_zero : (0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂).toMultilinearMap = 0 :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {R' R'' A : Type*} [Monoid R'] [Monoid R''] [Semiring A] [∀ i, Module A (M₁ i)]
[Module A M₂] [DistribMulAction R' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R' M₂]
[DistribMulAction R'' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R'' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R'' M₂]
instance : SMul R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun c f => { c • f.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.const_smul c }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) (c : R') (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultilinearMap_smul (c : R') (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :
(c • f).toMultilinearMap = c • f.toMultilinearMap :=
rfl
instance [SMulCommClass R' R'' M₂] : SMulCommClass R' R'' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance [SMul R' R''] [IsScalarTower R' R'' M₂] :
IsScalarTower R' R'' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance [DistribMulAction R'ᵐᵒᵖ M₂] [IsCentralScalar R' M₂] :
IsCentralScalar R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
instance : MulAction R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
Function.Injective.mulAction toMultilinearMap toMultilinearMap_injective fun _ _ => rfl
end SMul
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂]
instance : Add (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f f' => ⟨f.toMultilinearMap + f'.toMultilinearMap, f.cont.add f'.cont⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultilinearMap_add (f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(f + g).toMultilinearMap = f.toMultilinearMap + g.toMultilinearMap :=
rfl
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
toMultilinearMap_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Evaluation of a `ContinuousMultilinearMap` at a vector as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def applyAddHom (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →+ M₂ where
toFun f := f m
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i)
{s : Finset α} : (∑ a ∈ s, f a) m = ∑ a ∈ s, f a m :=
map_sum (applyAddHom m) f s
end ContinuousAdd
/-- If `f` is a continuous multilinear map, then `f.toContinuousLinearMap m i` is the continuous
linear map obtained by fixing all coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the
`i`-th coordinate. -/
@[simps!] def toContinuousLinearMap [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →L[R] M₂ :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.toLinearMap m i with
cont := f.cont.comp (continuous_const.update i continuous_id) }
/-- The cartesian product of two continuous multilinear maps, as a continuous multilinear map. -/
def prod (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.prod g.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.prodMk g.cont }
@[simp]
theorem prod_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f.prod g) m = (f m, g m) :=
rfl
/-- Combine a family of continuous multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
continuous multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `∀ i, M' i`. -/
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M' i)] (f : ∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
cont := continuous_pi fun i => (f i).coe_continuous
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.pi fun i => (f i).toMultilinearMap
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) : ⇑(pi f) = fun m j => f j m :=
rfl
theorem pi_apply {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (j : ι') : pi f m j = f j m :=
rfl
/-- Restrict the codomain of a continuous multilinear map to a submodule. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply_coe]
def codRestrict (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ p :=
⟨f.1.codRestrict p h, f.cont.subtype_mk _⟩
section
variable (R M₂ M₃)
/-- The natural equivalence between continuous linear maps from `M₂` to `M₃`
and continuous 1-multilinear maps from `M₂` to `M₃`. -/
@[simps! apply_toMultilinearMap apply_apply symm_apply_apply]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →L[R] M₃) ≃ ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₂) M₃ where
toFun f := ⟨MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i f,
(map_continuous f).comp (continuous_apply i)⟩
invFun f := ⟨(MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i).symm f.toMultilinearMap,
(map_continuous f).comp <| continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_id⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := toMultilinearMap_injective <|
(MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i).apply_symm_apply f.toMultilinearMap
variable (M₁) {M₂}
/-- The constant map is multilinear when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : M₂) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _ m
cont := continuous_const
end
/-- If `g` is continuous multilinear and `f` is a collection of continuous linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a continuous multilinear map, that we call
`g.compContinuousLinearMap f`. -/
def compContinuousLinearMap (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁' M₄)
(f : ∀ i : ι, M₁ i →L[R] M₁' i) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₄ :=
{ g.toMultilinearMap.compLinearMap fun i => (f i).toLinearMap with
cont := g.cont.comp <| continuous_pi fun j => (f j).cont.comp <| continuous_apply _ }
@[simp]
theorem compContinuousLinearMap_apply (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁' M₄)
(f : ∀ i : ι, M₁ i →L[R] M₁' i) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
g.compContinuousLinearMap f m = g fun i => f i <| m i :=
rfl
/-- Composing a continuous multilinear map with a continuous linear map gives again a
continuous multilinear map. -/
def _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃)
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ :=
{ g.toLinearMap.compMultilinearMap f.toMultilinearMap with cont := g.cont.comp f.cont }
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃)
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(g.compContinuousMultilinearMap f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₃) =
(g : M₂ → M₃) ∘ (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) := by
ext m
rfl
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.prod` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply_fst symm_apply_snd, simps -isSimp symm_apply]
def prodEquiv :
(ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ × ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) ≃
ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f := ((ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f,
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f)
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
theorem prod_ext_iff {f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)} :
f = g ↔ (ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g ∧
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g := by
rw [← Prod.mk_inj, ← prodEquiv_symm_apply, ← prodEquiv_symm_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[ext]
theorem prod_ext {f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)}
(h₁ : (ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g)
(h₂ : (ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f =
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap g) : f = g :=
prod_ext_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem eq_prod_iff {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)}
{g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} {h : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃} :
f = g.prod h ↔ (ContinuousLinearMap.fst _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f = g ∧
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd _ _ _).compContinuousMultilinearMap f = h :=
prod_ext_iff
theorem add_prod_add [ContinuousAdd M₂] [ContinuousAdd M₃]
(f₁ f₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g₁ g₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
(f₁ + f₂).prod (g₁ + g₂) = f₁.prod g₁ + f₂.prod g₂ :=
rfl
theorem smul_prod_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₂] [DistribMulAction S M₃]
[ContinuousConstSMul S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
[ContinuousConstSMul S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
(c : S) (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
(c • f).prod (c • g) = c • f.prod g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_prod_zero :
(0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂).prod (0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) = 0 :=
rfl
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def piEquiv {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)] :
(∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) ≃ ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
toFun := ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi
invFun f i := (ContinuousLinearMap.proj i : _ →L[R] M' i).compContinuousMultilinearMap f
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- An equivalence of the index set defines an equivalence between the spaces of continuous
multilinear maps. This is the forward map of this equivalence. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply]
nonrec def domDomCongr {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι')
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₂) M₃) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι' => M₂) M₃ where
toMultilinearMap := f.domDomCongr e
cont := f.cont.comp <| continuous_pi fun _ => continuous_apply _
/-- An equivalence of the index set defines an equivalence between the spaces of continuous
multilinear maps. In case of normed spaces, this is a linear isometric equivalence, see
`ContinuousMultilinearMap.domDomCongrₗᵢ`. -/
@[simps]
def domDomCongrEquiv {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₂) M₃ ≃
ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι' => M₂) M₃ where
toFun := domDomCongr e
invFun := domDomCongr e.symm
left_inv _ := ext fun _ => by simp
right_inv _ := ext fun _ => by simp
section linearDeriv
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x y : ∀ i, M₁ i)
/-- The derivative of a continuous multilinear map, as a continuous linear map
from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂`; see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasFDerivAt`. -/
def linearDeriv : (∀ i, M₁ i) →L[R] M₂ := ∑ i : ι, (f.toContinuousLinearMap x i).comp (.proj i)
@[simp]
lemma linearDeriv_apply : f.linearDeriv x y = ∑ i, f (Function.update x i (y i)) := by
unfold linearDeriv toContinuousLinearMap
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sum', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp',
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_mk', LinearMap.coe_mk, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, Finset.sum_apply]
rfl
end linearDeriv
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `(i : Fin (n+1)) → M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
additivity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_add (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x + y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.cons_add m x y
/-- In the specific case of continuous multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one
can build an element of `(i : Fin (n+1)) → M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the
multiplicativity of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_smul (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (c : R)
(x : M 0) : f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.cons_smul m c x
theorem map_piecewise_add [DecidableEq ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) (t : Finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s ∈ t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_piecewise_add _ _ _
/-- Additivity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
theorem map_add_univ [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : Finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_add_univ _ _
section ApplySum
open Fintype Finset
variable {α : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] (g : ∀ i, α i → M₁ i) (A : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the
sum of `f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum_finset [DecidableEq ι] :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_sum_finset _ _
/-- If `f` is continuous multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
(f fun i => ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : ∀ i, α i, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_sum _
end ApplySum
section RestrictScalar
variable (R)
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [SMul R A] [∀ i : ι, Module A (M₁ i)] [Module A M₂]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower R A (M₁ i)] [IsScalarTower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toMultilinearMap := f.toMultilinearMap.restrictScalars R
cont := f.cont
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ⇑(f.restrictScalars R) = f :=
rfl
end RestrictScalar
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] (f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_update_sub _ _ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")]
protected alias map_sub := ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_update_sub
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup M₂]
instance : Neg (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f => { -f.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.neg }⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (-f) m = -f m :=
rfl
instance : Sub (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f g => { f.toMultilinearMap - g.toMultilinearMap with cont := f.cont.sub g.cont }⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f - f') m = f m - f' m :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
toMultilinearMap_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
theorem neg_prod_neg [AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₃]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup M₃] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(g : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) : (-f).prod (-g) = - f.prod g :=
rfl
theorem sub_prod_sub [AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₃]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup M₃] (f₁ f₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(g₁ g₂ : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
(f₁ - f₂).prod (g₁ - g₂) = f₁.prod g₁ - f₂.prod g₂ :=
rfl
end IsTopologicalAddGroup
end Ring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂]
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
theorem map_piecewise_smul [DecidableEq ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) = (∏ i ∈ s, c i) • f m :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_piecewise_smul _ _ _
/-- Multiplicativity of a continuous multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i ↦ c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
theorem map_smul_univ [Fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(f fun i => c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_smul_univ _ _
end CommSemiring
section DistribMulAction
variable {R' R'' A : Type*} [Monoid R'] [Monoid R''] [Semiring A] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [∀ i, Module A (M₁ i)]
[Module A M₂] [DistribMulAction R' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R' M₂]
[DistribMulAction R'' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R'' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R'' M₂]
instance [ContinuousAdd M₂] : DistribMulAction R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction
{ toFun := toMultilinearMap,
map_zero' := toMultilinearMap_zero,
map_add' := toMultilinearMap_add }
toMultilinearMap_injective
fun _ _ => rfl
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable {R' A : Type*} [Semiring R'] [Semiring A] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [ContinuousAdd M₂] [∀ i, Module A (M₁ i)]
[Module A M₂] [Module R' M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul R' M₂] [SMulCommClass A R' M₂]
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the
pointwise addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : Module R' (ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) :=
Function.Injective.module _
{ toFun := toMultilinearMap,
map_zero' := toMultilinearMap_zero,
map_add' := toMultilinearMap_add }
toMultilinearMap_injective fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Linear map version of the map `toMultilinearMap` associating to a continuous multilinear map
the corresponding multilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def toMultilinearMapLinear : ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ M₂ →ₗ[R'] MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂ where
toFun := toMultilinearMap
map_add' := toMultilinearMap_add
map_smul' := toMultilinearMap_smul
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def piLinearEquiv {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M' i)] [∀ i, ContinuousAdd (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R' (M' i)]
[∀ i, Module A (M' i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass A R' (M' i)] [∀ i, ContinuousConstSMul R' (M' i)] :
(∀ i, ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ (M' i)) ≃ₗ[R'] ContinuousMultilinearMap A M₁ (∀ i, M' i) :=
{ piEquiv with
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
end Module
section CommAlgebra
variable (R ι) (A : Type*) [Fintype ι] [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
[TopologicalSpace A] [ContinuousMul A]
/-- The continuous multilinear map on `A^ι`, where `A` is a normed commutative algebra
over `𝕜`, associating to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebra : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => A) A where
cont := continuous_finset_prod _ fun _ _ => continuous_apply _
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebra_apply (m : ι → A) : ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end CommAlgebra
section Algebra
variable (R n) (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[ContinuousMul A]
/-- The continuous multilinear map on `A^n`, where `A` is a normed algebra over `𝕜`, associating to
`m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also: `ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebraFin : A[×n]→L[R] A where
cont := by
change Continuous fun m => (List.ofFn m).prod
simp_rw [List.ofFn_eq_map]
exact continuous_list_prod _ fun i _ => continuous_apply _
toMultilinearMap := MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A
variable {R n A}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply (m : Fin n → A) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A m = (List.ofFn m).prod :=
rfl
end Algebra
section SMulRight
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] [TopologicalSpace R] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂]
[ContinuousSMul R M₂] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂)
/-- Given a continuous `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smulRight z` is the
continuous multilinear map sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
@[simps! toMultilinearMap apply]
def smulRight : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toMultilinearMap := f.toMultilinearMap.smulRight z
cont := f.cont.smul continuous_const
end SMulRight
section CommRing
variable {M : Type*}
variable [Fintype ι] [CommRing R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable [ContinuousMul R] [ContinuousSMul R M]
variable (R ι) in
/-- The canonical continuous multilinear map on `R^ι`, associating to `m` the product of all the
`m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module) -/
protected def mkPiRing (z : M) : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R).smulRight z
@[simp]
theorem mkPiRing_apply (z : M) (m : ι → R) :
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z : (ι → R) → M) m = (∏ i, m i) • z :=
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (f fun _ => 1) = f :=
toMultilinearMap_injective f.toMultilinearMap.mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self
theorem mkPiRing_eq_iff {z₁ z₂ : M} :
ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₁ = ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₂ ↔
z₁ = z₂ := by
rw [← toMultilinearMap_injective.eq_iff]
exact MultilinearMap.mkPiRing_eq_iff
theorem mkPiRing_zero : ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (0 : M) = 0 := by
ext; rw [mkPiRing_apply, smul_zero, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem mkPiRing_eq_zero_iff (z : M) : ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
rw [← mkPiRing_zero, mkPiRing_eq_iff]
end CommRing
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 683 | 684 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-!
# Determinant of a matrix
This file defines the determinant of a matrix, `Matrix.det`, and its essential properties.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.det`: the determinant of a square matrix, as a sum over permutations
- `Matrix.detRowAlternating`: the determinant, as an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix
## Main results
- `det_mul`: the determinant of `A * B` is the product of determinants
- `det_zero_of_row_eq`: the determinant is zero if there is a repeated row
- `det_block_diagonal`: the determinant of a block diagonal matrix is a product
of the blocks' determinants
## Implementation notes
It is possible to configure `simp` to compute determinants. See the file
`MathlibTest/matrix.lean` for some examples.
-/
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
/-- `det` is an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix. -/
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
/-- The determinant of a matrix given by the Leibniz formula. -/
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
theorem det_eq_detp_sub_detp (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = M.detp 1 - M.detp (-1) := by
rw [det_apply, ← Equiv.sum_comp (Equiv.inv (Perm n)), ← ofSign_disjUnion, sum_disjUnion]
simp_rw [inv_apply, sign_inv, sub_eq_add_neg, detp, ← sum_neg_distrib]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) <;>
rw [mem_ofSign.mp hσ, ← Equiv.prod_comp σ] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
obtain ⟨x, h3⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2)
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
ext
exact det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 0) : det A = 1 :=
haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
det_isEmpty
/-- If `n` has only one element, the determinant of an `n` by `n` matrix is just that element.
Although `Unique` implies `DecidableEq` and `Fintype`, the instances might
not be syntactically equal. Thus, we need to fill in the args explicitly. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_unique {n : Type*} [Unique n] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) :
det A = A default default := by simp [det_apply, univ_unique]
theorem det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n R) (k : n) :
det A = A k k := by
have := uniqueOfSubsingleton k
convert det_unique A
theorem det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) (k : n) :
det A = A k k :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
theorem det_mul_aux {M N : Matrix n n R} {p : n → n} (H : ¬Bijective p) :
(∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ x, M (σ x) (p x) * N (p x) x) = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, j, hpij, hij⟩ : ∃ i j, p i = p j ∧ i ≠ j := by
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_bijective, Injective] at H
push_neg at H
exact H
exact
sum_involution (fun σ _ => σ * Equiv.swap i j)
(fun σ _ => by
have : (∏ x, M (σ x) (p x)) = ∏ x, M ((σ * Equiv.swap i j) x) (p x) :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (swap i j) _ _ (by simp [apply_swap_eq_self hpij])
simp [this, sign_swap hij, -sign_swap', prod_mul_distrib])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr mul_swap_eq_iff).mpr hij) (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun σ _ =>
mul_swap_involutive i j σ
@[simp]
theorem det_mul (M N : Matrix n n R) : det (M * N) = det M * det N :=
calc
det (M * N) = ∑ p : n → n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
simp only [det_apply', mul_apply, prod_univ_sum, mul_sum, Fintype.piFinset_univ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ = ∑ p : n → n with Bijective p, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
refine (sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun f _ hbij ↦ det_mul_aux ?_).symm
simpa only [true_and, mem_filter, mem_univ] using hbij
_ = ∑ τ : Perm n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (τ i) * N (τ i) i :=
sum_bij (fun p h ↦ Equiv.ofBijective p (mem_filter.1 h).2) (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _)
(fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ by injection h)
(fun b _ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _, b.bijective⟩, coe_fn_injective rfl⟩) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * ε τ * ∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j) := by
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * (ε σ * ε τ) * ∏ i, M (τ i) i :=
(sum_congr rfl fun σ _ =>
Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.mulRight σ⁻¹) _ _ fun τ => by
have : (∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j)) = ∏ j, M ((τ * σ⁻¹) j) j := by
rw [← (σ⁻¹ : _ ≃ _).prod_comp]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, apply_inv_self, Function.comp_apply]
have h : ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε τ :=
calc
ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε (τ * σ⁻¹ * σ) := by
rw [mul_comm, sign_mul (τ * σ⁻¹)]
simp only [Int.cast_mul, Units.val_mul]
_ = ε τ := by simp only [inv_mul_cancel_right]
simp_rw [Equiv.coe_mulRight, h]
simp only [this])
_ = det M * det N := by
simp only [det_apply', Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
/-- The determinant of a matrix, as a monoid homomorphism. -/
def detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →* R where
toFun := det
map_one' := det_one
map_mul' := det_mul
@[simp]
theorem coe_detMonoidHom : (detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R → R) = det :=
rfl
/-- On square matrices, `mul_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_comm (M N : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_left_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_left_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * (N * P)) = det (N * (M * P)) := by
rw [← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm M N, ← det_mul]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_right_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_right_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N * P) = det (M * P * N) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm N P, ← det_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M.val * N * M⁻¹.val) = det N := by
rw [det_mul_right_comm, Units.mul_inv, one_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj' (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M⁻¹.val * N * ↑M.val) = det N :=
det_units_conj M⁻¹ N
/-- Transposing a matrix preserves the determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_transpose (M : Matrix n n R) : Mᵀ.det = M.det := by
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
refine Fintype.sum_bijective _ inv_involutive.bijective _ _ ?_
intro σ
rw [sign_inv]
congr 1
apply Fintype.prod_equiv σ
simp
/-- Permuting the columns changes the sign of the determinant. -/
theorem det_permute (σ : Perm n) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M.submatrix σ id).det = Perm.sign σ * M.det :=
((detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_perm M σ).trans (by simp [Units.smul_def])
/-- Permuting the rows changes the sign of the determinant. -/
theorem det_permute' (σ : Perm n) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M.submatrix id σ).det = Perm.sign σ * M.det := by
rw [← det_transpose, transpose_submatrix, det_permute, det_transpose]
/-- Permuting rows and columns with the same equivalence does not change the determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_submatrix_equiv_self (e : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m R) :
det (A.submatrix e e) = det A := by
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
apply Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.permCongr e)
intro σ
rw [Equiv.Perm.sign_permCongr e σ]
congr 1
apply Fintype.prod_equiv e
intro i
rw [Equiv.permCongr_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, submatrix_apply]
/-- Permuting rows and columns with two equivalences does not change the absolute value of the
determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem abs_det_submatrix_equiv_equiv {R : Type*}
[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m R) :
|(A.submatrix e₁ e₂).det| = |A.det| := by
have hee : e₂ = e₁.trans (e₁.symm.trans e₂) := by ext; simp
rw [hee]
show |((A.submatrix id (e₁.symm.trans e₂)).submatrix e₁ e₁).det| = |A.det|
rw [Matrix.det_submatrix_equiv_self, Matrix.det_permute', abs_mul, abs_unit_intCast, one_mul]
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_submatrix_equiv_self`; this one is unsuitable because
`Matrix.reindex_apply` unfolds `reindex` first.
-/
theorem det_reindex_self (e : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m R) : det (reindex e e A) = det A :=
det_submatrix_equiv_self e.symm A
/-- Reindexing both indices along equivalences preserves the absolute of the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `abs_det_submatrix_equiv_equiv`;
this one is unsuitable because `Matrix.reindex_apply` unfolds `reindex` first.
-/
theorem abs_det_reindex {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(e₁ e₂ : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m R) :
|det (reindex e₁ e₂ A)| = |det A| :=
abs_det_submatrix_equiv_equiv e₁.symm e₂.symm A
theorem det_smul (A : Matrix n n R) (c : R) : det (c • A) = c ^ Fintype.card n * det A :=
calc
det (c • A) = det ((diagonal fun _ => c) * A) := by rw [smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
_ = det (diagonal fun _ => c) * det A := det_mul _ _
_ = c ^ Fintype.card n * det A := by simp
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_of_tower {α} [Monoid α] [MulAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass α R R] (c : α) (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (c • A) = c ^ Fintype.card n • det A := by
rw [← smul_one_smul R c A, det_smul, smul_pow, one_pow, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
theorem det_neg (A : Matrix n n R) : det (-A) = (-1) ^ Fintype.card n * det A := by
rw [← det_smul, neg_one_smul]
/-- A variant of `Matrix.det_neg` with scalar multiplication by `Units ℤ` instead of multiplication
by `R`. -/
theorem det_neg_eq_smul (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (-A) = (-1 : Units ℤ) ^ Fintype.card n • det A := by
rw [← det_smul_of_tower, Units.neg_smul, one_smul]
/-- Multiplying each row by a fixed `v i` multiplies the determinant by
the product of the `v`s. -/
theorem det_mul_row (v : n → R) (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (of fun i j => v j * A i j) = (∏ i, v i) * det A :=
calc
det (of fun i j => v j * A i j) = det (A * diagonal v) :=
congr_arg det <| by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
_ = (∏ i, v i) * det A := by rw [det_mul, det_diagonal, mul_comm]
/-- Multiplying each column by a fixed `v j` multiplies the determinant by
the product of the `v`s. -/
theorem det_mul_column (v : n → R) (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (of fun i j => v i * A i j) = (∏ i, v i) * det A :=
MultilinearMap.map_smul_univ _ v A
@[simp]
theorem det_pow (M : Matrix m m R) (n : ℕ) : det (M ^ n) = det M ^ n :=
(detMonoidHom : Matrix m m R →* R).map_pow M n
section HomMap
variable {S : Type w} [CommRing S]
theorem _root_.RingHom.map_det (f : R →+* S) (M : Matrix n n R) :
f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) := by
simp [Matrix.det_apply', map_sum f, map_prod f]
theorem _root_.RingEquiv.map_det (f : R ≃+* S) (M : Matrix n n R) :
f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toRingHom.map_det _
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_det [Algebra R S] {T : Type z} [CommRing T] [Algebra R T] (f : S →ₐ[R] T)
(M : Matrix n n S) : f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toRingHom.map_det _
| theorem _root_.AlgEquiv.map_det [Algebra R S] {T : Type z} [CommRing T] [Algebra R T]
(f : S ≃ₐ[R] T) (M : Matrix n n S) : f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toAlgHom.map_det _
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 320 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : α ⊕ (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec` -/
def Corec.f (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → Option α × (α ⊕ β)
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
rcases o with _ | b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s -/
def BisimO : α ⊕ (Computation α) → α ⊕ (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value -/
protected def Mem (s : Computation α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ pure b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_pure_mem, fun h => h ▸ ret_mem _⟩
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h
rw [p h]
exact h
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; rcases length (think s) with - | n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction n with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _ <;>
(intro s; apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _) <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := of_results_think h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
/-- Recursor based on membership -/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates` -/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation` -/
def Bind.g : β ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation` -/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Computation α ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) := by
apply s.recOn <;> intro <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Computation α, map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; simp only [map, comp_apply, id_eq]
have e : @Option.rec α (fun _ => Option α) none some = id := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
have h : ((fun x : Option α => x) = id) := rfl
simp [e, h, Stream'.map_id]
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Computation α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (pure a) f = f a := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = bind (pure a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨ c₁ = corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inr c₂)
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ =>
simp only [BisimO, bind, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap, destruct_pure]
rcases destruct (f a) with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
| _, c, Or.inr rfl =>
simp only [BisimO, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap]
rcases destruct c with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [bind, Bind.f]
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (pure ∘ f) = map f s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s (pure ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp
· simpa using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure' (s : Computation α) : bind s pure = s := by
simpa using bind_pure id s
@[simp]
theorem bind_assoc (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) (g : β → Computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ =>
c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp only [BisimO, ret_bind]; generalize f s = fs
apply recOn fs <;> intro t <;> simp
· rcases destruct (g t) with b | cb <;> simp
· simpa [BisimO] using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m)
(h2 : Results (f a) b n) : Results (bind s f) b (n + m) := by
have := h1.mem; revert m
apply memRecOn this _ fun s IH => _
· intro _ h1
rw [ret_bind]
rw [h1.len_unique (results_pure _)]
exact h2
· intro _ h3 _ h1
rw [think_bind]
obtain ⟨m', h⟩ := of_results_think h1
obtain ⟨h1, e⟩ := h
rw [e]
exact results_think (h3 h1)
theorem mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨_, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2
(results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : Terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem get_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem length_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [_T1 : Terminates s]
[_T2 : Terminates (f (get s))] : length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique <|
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b k} :
Results (bind s f) b k → ∃ a m n, Results s a m ∧ Results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m := by
induction k generalizing s with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _
<;> apply recOn s (fun a => _) fun s' => _ <;> intro e h
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, _, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN h)
contradiction
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, n + 1, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· simp only [think_bind, results_think_iff] at h
let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH h
rw [e']
exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h
let ⟨a, _, _, h1, h2, _⟩ := of_results_bind h
⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
theorem bind_promises {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : s ~> a)
(h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b := fun b' bB => by
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩
rw [← h1 a's] at ba'; exact h2 ba'
instance monad : Monad Computation where
map := @map
pure := @pure
bind := @bind
instance : LawfulMonad Computation := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := @map_id)
(bind_pure_comp := @bind_pure)
(pure_bind := @ret_bind)
(bind_assoc := @bind_assoc)
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : Computation α) : f <$> c = map f c :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_def (a) : (return a : Computation α) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_pure' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> pure a = pure (f a) :=
map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (s), f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) :=
map_think
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : Computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s := by
rw [← bind_pure]; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
rw [← bind_pure] at h
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
exact ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) [Terminates s] : Terminates (map f s) := by
rw [← bind_pure]; exact terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (α := β) (f (get s))))
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) : Terminates (map f s) ↔ Terminates s :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨_, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@Computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orElse (c₁ : Computation α) (c₂ : Unit → Computation α) : Computation α :=
@Computation.corec α (Computation α × Computation α)
(fun ⟨c₁, c₂⟩ =>
match destruct c₁ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₁' =>
match destruct c₂ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₂' => Sum.inr (c₁', c₂'))
(c₁, c₂ ())
instance instAlternativeComputation : Alternative Computation :=
{ Computation.monad with
orElse := @orElse
failure := @empty }
@[simp]
theorem ret_orElse (a : α) (c₂ : Computation α) : (pure a <|> c₂) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_pure (c₁ : Computation α) (a : α) : (think c₁ <|> pure a) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_think (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : (think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem empty_orElse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_empty (c : Computation α) : (c <|> empty α) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (c₂ <|> empty α) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
/-- `c₁ ~ c₂` asserts that `c₁` and `c₂` either both terminate with the same result,
or both loop forever. -/
def Equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : Prop :=
∀ a, a ∈ c₁ ↔ a ∈ c₂
/-- equivalence relation for computations -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~ " => Equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl (s : Computation α) : s ~ s := fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm {s t : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ s := fun h a => (h a).symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans {s t u : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u := fun h1 h2 a =>
(h1 a).trans (h2 a)
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
theorem equiv_of_mem {s t : Computation α} {a} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : a ∈ t) : s ~ t := fun a' =>
⟨fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h1]; exact h2, fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h2]; exact h1⟩
theorem terminates_congr {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) : Terminates c₁ ↔ Terminates c₂ := by
simp only [terminates_iff, exists_congr h]
theorem promises_congr {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) (a) : c₁ ~> a ↔ c₂ ~> a :=
forall_congr' fun a' => imp_congr (h a') Iff.rfl
theorem get_equiv {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) [Terminates c₁] [Terminates c₂] :
get c₁ = get c₂ :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (h _).2 <| get_mem _
theorem think_equiv (s : Computation α) : think s ~ s := fun _ => ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩
theorem thinkN_equiv (s : Computation α) (n) : thinkN s n ~ s := fun _ => thinkN_mem n
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : Computation α} {f1 f2 : α → Computation β} (h1 : s1 ~ s2)
(h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ f2 a) : bind s1 f1 ~ bind s2 f2 := fun b =>
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
mem_bind ((h1 a).1 ha) ((h2 a b).1 hb),
fun h =>
let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
mem_bind ((h1 a).2 ha) ((h2 a b).2 hb)⟩
theorem equiv_pure_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : s ~ pure a :=
equiv_of_mem h (ret_mem _)
/-- `LiftRel R ca cb` is a generalization of `Equiv` to relations other than
equality. It asserts that if `ca` terminates with `a`, then `cb` terminates with
some `b` such that `R a b`, and if `cb` terminates with `b` then `ca` terminates
with some `a` such that `R a b`. -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) : Prop :=
(∀ {a}, a ∈ ca → ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b) ∧ ∀ {b}, b ∈ cb → ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel (swap R) cb ca ↔ LiftRel R ca cb :=
@and_comm _ _
theorem lift_eq_iff_equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : LiftRel (· = ·) c₁ c₂ ↔ c₁ ~ c₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ a =>
⟨fun a1 => by let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := h1 a1; rwa [ab],
fun a2 => by let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := h2 a2; rwa [← ab]⟩,
fun e => ⟨fun {a} a1 => ⟨a, (e _).1 a1, rfl⟩, fun {a} a2 => ⟨a, (e _).2 a2, rfl⟩⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun _ =>
⟨fun {a} as => ⟨a, as, H a⟩, fun {b} bs => ⟨b, bs, H b⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun _ _ ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} a2 =>
let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := r a2
⟨b, b1, H ab⟩,
fun {_} a1 =>
let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l a1
⟨b, b2, H ab⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun _ _ _ ⟨l1, r1⟩ ⟨l2, r2⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} a1 =>
let ⟨_, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1
let ⟨c, c3, bc⟩ := l2 b2
⟨c, c3, H ab bc⟩,
fun {_} c3 =>
let ⟨_, b2, bc⟩ := r2 c3
let ⟨a, a1, ab⟩ := r1 b2
⟨a, a1, H ab bc⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @LiftRel.symm _ R @symm, @LiftRel.trans _ R @trans⟩
theorem LiftRel.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) (s t) :
LiftRel R s t → LiftRel S s t
| ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} as =>
let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as
⟨b, bt, H ab⟩,
fun {_} bt =>
let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt
⟨a, as, H ab⟩⟩
theorem terminates_of_liftRel {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} :
LiftRel R s t → (Terminates s ↔ Terminates t)
| ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, as⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨b, bt, _⟩ := l as
⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩,
fun ⟨⟨_, bt⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨a, as, _⟩ := r bt
⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩⟩
|
theorem rel_of_liftRel {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
LiftRel R ca cb → ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b
| ⟨l, _⟩, a, b, ma, mb => by
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 919 | 922 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Pointwise
/-!
# Infinite sums and products in topological groups
Lemmas on topological sums in groups (as opposed to monoids).
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section IsTopologicalGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalGroup α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
-- `by simpa using` speeds up elaboration. Why?
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.inv (h : HasProd f a) : HasProd (fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) a⁻¹ := by
simpa only using h.map (MonoidHom.id α)⁻¹ continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.inv (hf : Multipliable f) : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹ :=
hf.hasProd.inv.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.of_inv (hf : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) : Multipliable f := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using hf.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_inv_iff : (Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨Multipliable.of_inv, Multipliable.inv⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.div (hf : HasProd f a₁) (hg : HasProd g a₂) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b / g b) (a₁ / a₂) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.trans_div (hg : Multipliable g) (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f := by
simpa only [div_mul_cancel] using hfg.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_iff_of_multipliable_div (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.trans_div <| by simpa only [inv_div] using hfg.inv, fun hg ↦ hg.trans_div hfg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.update (hf : HasProd f a₁) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
HasProd (update f b a) (a / f b * a₁) := by
convert (hasProd_ite_eq b (a / f b)).mul hf with b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· rw [h, update_self]
simp [eq_self_iff_true, if_true, sub_add_cancel]
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, if_false, Ne, one_mul, not_false_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.update (hf : Multipliable f) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
Multipliable (update f b a) :=
(hf.hasProd.update b a).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) a₂ ↔ HasProd f (a₁ * a₂) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ hf.mul_compl h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at hf ⊢
rw [Set.mulIndicator_compl]
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_comm] using h.div hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_iff_compl {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd f a₂ ↔ HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) (a₂ / a₁) :=
Iff.symm <| hf.hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f where
mp := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_compl_iff.1 ha).multipliable
mpr := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_iff_compl.1 ha).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd f (a * ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_iff_compl (s : Finset β) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) (a / ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_iff_compl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
(Multipliable fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(s.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.Finite.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(hs.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_div_hasProd [DecidableEq β] (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) :
HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) (a / f b) := by
convert hf.update b 1 using 1
· ext n
rw [Function.update_apply]
· rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul]
/-- A more general version of `Multipliable.congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set.
Note that this requires the target to be a group, and hence fails for products valued
in a ring. See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite₀` for a version applying in this case,
with an additional non-vanishing hypothesis.
-/
@[to_additive "A more general version of `Summable.congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr_cofinite (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : f =ᶠ[cofinite] g) :
Multipliable g :=
hfg.multipliable_compl_iff.mp <| (hfg.multipliable_compl_iff.mpr hf).congr (by simp)
/-- A more general version of `multipliable_congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "A more general version of `summable_congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr_cofinite (hfg : f =ᶠ[cofinite] g) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.congr_cofinite hfg, fun h ↦ h.congr_cofinite (hfg.mono fun _ h' ↦ h'.symm)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.congr_atTop {f₁ g₁ : ℕ → α} (hf : Multipliable f₁) (hfg : f₁ =ᶠ[atTop] g₁) :
Multipliable g₁ := hf.congr_cofinite (Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hfg)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_congr_atTop {f₁ g₁ : ℕ → α} (hfg : f₁ =ᶠ[atTop] g₁) :
Multipliable f₁ ↔ Multipliable g₁ := multipliable_congr_cofinite (Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hfg)
section tprod
variable [T2Space α]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_inv : ∏' b, (f b)⁻¹ = (∏' b, f b)⁻¹ := by
by_cases hf : Multipliable f
· exact hf.hasProd.inv.tprod_eq
· simp [tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable hf,
tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable (mt Multipliable.of_inv hf)]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.tprod_div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
∏' b, (f b / g b) = (∏' b, f b) / ∏' b, g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).tprod_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_sub := Summable.tsum_sub
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_div :=
Multipliable.tprod_div
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.prod_mul_tprod_compl {s : Finset β} (hf : Multipliable f) :
(∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏' x : ↑(s : Set β)ᶜ, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
((s.hasProd f).mul_compl (s.multipliable_compl_iff.2 hf).hasProd).tprod_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias sum_add_tsum_compl := Summable.sum_add_tsum_compl
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias prod_mul_tprod_compl :=
Multipliable.prod_mul_tprod_compl
/-- Let `f : β → α` be a multipliable function and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite` writes `∏ n, f n` as `f b` times the product of the
remaining terms. -/
@[to_additive "Let `f : β → α` be a summable function and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite` writes `Σ' n, f n` as `f b` plus the sum of the
remaining terms."]
protected theorem Multipliable.tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite [DecidableEq β] (hf : Multipliable f)
(b : β) : ∏' n, f n = f b * ∏' n, ite (n = b) 1 (f n) := by
rw [(hasProd_ite_div_hasProd hf.hasProd b).tprod_eq]
exact (mul_div_cancel _ _).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite := Summable.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite :=
Multipliable.tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite
end tprod
end IsTopologicalGroup
section IsUniformGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [UniformSpace α]
/-- The **Cauchy criterion** for infinite products, also known as the **Cauchy convergence test** -/
@[to_additive "The **Cauchy criterion** for infinite sums, also known as the
**Cauchy convergence test**"]
theorem multipliable_iff_cauchySeq_finset [CompleteSpace α] {f : β → α} :
Multipliable f ↔ CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
classical exact cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
variable [IsUniformGroup α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → (∏ b ∈ t, f b) ∈ e := by
classical
simp only [CauchySeq, cauchy_map_iff, and_iff_right atTop_neBot, prod_atTop_atTop_eq,
| uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one α, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def, atTop_neBot, true_and]
rw [tendsto_atTop']
constructor
· intro h e he
obtain ⟨⟨s₁, s₂⟩, h⟩ := h e he
use s₁ ∪ s₂
intro t ht
specialize h (s₁ ∪ s₂, s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ t) ⟨le_sup_left, le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_right⟩
simpa only [Finset.prod_union ht.symm, mul_div_cancel_left] using h
· rintro h e he
rcases exists_nhds_split_inv he with ⟨d, hd, hde⟩
rcases h d hd with ⟨s, h⟩
use (s, s)
rintro ⟨t₁, t₂⟩ ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
have : ((∏ b ∈ t₂, f b) / ∏ b ∈ t₁, f b) = (∏ b ∈ t₂ \ s, f b) / ∏ b ∈ t₁ \ s, f b := by
rw [← Finset.prod_sdiff ht₁, ← Finset.prod_sdiff ht₂, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
simp only [this]
exact hde _ (h _ Finset.sdiff_disjoint) _ (h _ Finset.sdiff_disjoint)
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Group.lean | 226 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
/-!
# Minimality and Maximality
This file proves basic facts about minimality and maximality
of an element with respect to a predicate `P` on an ordered type `α`.
## Implementation Details
This file underwent a refactor from a version where minimality and maximality were defined using
sets rather than predicates, and with an unbundled order relation rather than a `LE` instance.
A side effect is that it has become less straightforward to state that something is minimal
with respect to a relation that is *not* defeq to the default `LE`.
One possible way would be with a type synonym,
and another would be with an ad hoc `LE` instance and `@` notation.
This was not an issue in practice anywhere in mathlib at the time of the refactor,
but it may be worth re-examining this to make it easier in the future; see the TODO below.
## TODO
* In the linearly ordered case, versions of lemmas like `minimal_mem_image` will hold with
`MonotoneOn`/`AntitoneOn` assumptions rather than the stronger `x ≤ y ↔ f x ≤ f y` assumptions.
* `Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert` and `Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton` will generalize to
lemmas about covering in the case of an `IsStronglyAtomic`/`IsStronglyCoatomic` order.
* `Finset` versions of the lemmas about sets.
* API to allow for easily expressing min/maximality with respect to an arbitrary non-`LE` relation.
* API for `MinimalFor`/`MaximalFor`
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Set OrderDual
variable {α : Type*} {P Q : α → Prop} {a x y : α}
section LE
variable [LE α]
@[simp] theorem minimal_toDual : Minimal (fun x ↦ P (ofDual x)) (toDual x) ↔ Maximal P x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Minimal.of_dual, Minimal.dual⟩ := minimal_toDual
@[simp] theorem maximal_toDual : Maximal (fun x ↦ P (ofDual x)) (toDual x) ↔ Minimal P x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Maximal.of_dual, Maximal.dual⟩ := maximal_toDual
@[simp] theorem minimal_false : ¬ Minimal (fun _ ↦ False) x := by
simp [Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_false : ¬ Maximal (fun _ ↦ False) x := by
simp [Maximal]
@[simp] theorem minimal_true : Minimal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ IsMin x := by
simp [IsMin, Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_true : Maximal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ IsMax x :=
minimal_true (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem minimal_subtype {x : Subtype Q} :
Minimal (fun x ↦ P x.1) x ↔ Minimal (P ⊓ Q) x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp only [Minimal, Subtype.forall, Subtype.mk_le_mk, Pi.inf_apply, inf_Prop_eq]
tauto
@[simp] theorem maximal_subtype {x : Subtype Q} :
Maximal (fun x ↦ P x.1) x ↔ Maximal (P ⊓ Q) x :=
minimal_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem maximal_true_subtype {x : Subtype P} : Maximal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ Maximal P x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp [Maximal, hx]
theorem minimal_true_subtype {x : Subtype P} : Minimal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ Minimal P x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp [Minimal, hx]
@[simp] theorem minimal_minimal : Minimal (Minimal P) x ↔ Minimal P x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.prop, fun h ↦ ⟨h, fun _ hy hyx ↦ h.le_of_le hy.prop hyx⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem maximal_maximal : Maximal (Maximal P) x ↔ Maximal P x :=
minimal_minimal (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If `P` is down-closed, then minimal elements satisfying `P` are exactly the globally minimal
elements satisfying `P`. -/
theorem minimal_iff_isMin (hP : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P y → x ≤ y → P x) : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ IsMin x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.prop, fun _ h' ↦ h.le_of_le (hP h.prop h') h'⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ _ h' ↦ h.2 h'⟩⟩
/-- If `P` is up-closed, then maximal elements satisfying `P` are exactly the globally maximal
elements satisfying `P`. -/
theorem maximal_iff_isMax (hP : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P y → y ≤ x → P x) : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ IsMax x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.prop, fun _ h' ↦ h.le_of_ge (hP h.prop h') h'⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ _ h' ↦ h.2 h'⟩⟩
theorem Minimal.mono (h : Minimal P x) (hle : Q ≤ P) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal Q x :=
⟨hQ, fun y hQy ↦ h.le_of_le (hle y hQy)⟩
theorem Maximal.mono (h : Maximal P x) (hle : Q ≤ P) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal Q x :=
⟨hQ, fun y hQy ↦ h.le_of_ge (hle y hQy)⟩
theorem Minimal.and_right (h : Minimal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.left) ⟨h.prop, hQ⟩
theorem Minimal.and_left (h : Minimal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal (fun x ↦ (Q x ∧ P x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.right) ⟨hQ, h.prop⟩
theorem Maximal.and_right (h : Maximal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal (fun x ↦ (P x ∧ Q x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.left) ⟨h.prop, hQ⟩
theorem Maximal.and_left (h : Maximal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal (fun x ↦ (Q x ∧ P x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.right) ⟨hQ, h.prop⟩
@[simp] theorem minimal_eq_iff : Minimal (· = y) x ↔ x = y := by
simp +contextual [Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_eq_iff : Maximal (· = y) x ↔ x = y := by
simp +contextual [Maximal]
theorem not_minimal_iff (hx : P x) : ¬ Minimal P x ↔ ∃ y, P y ∧ y ≤ x ∧ ¬ (x ≤ y) := by
simp [Minimal, hx]
theorem not_maximal_iff (hx : P x) : ¬ Maximal P x ↔ ∃ y, P y ∧ x ≤ y ∧ ¬ (y ≤ x) :=
not_minimal_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) hx
theorem Minimal.or (h : Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∨ Q x) x) : Minimal P x ∨ Minimal Q x := by
obtain ⟨h | h, hmin⟩ := h
· exact .inl ⟨h, fun y hy hyx ↦ hmin (Or.inl hy) hyx⟩
exact .inr ⟨h, fun y hy hyx ↦ hmin (Or.inr hy) hyx⟩
theorem Maximal.or (h : Maximal (fun x ↦ P x ∨ Q x) x) : Maximal P x ∨ Maximal Q x :=
Minimal.or (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x ↔ (Minimal P x) ∧ Q x := by
simp_rw [and_iff_left_of_imp (fun x ↦ hPQ x), iff_self_and]
exact fun h ↦ hPQ h.prop
theorem minimal_and_iff_left_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Minimal (fun x ↦ Q x ∧ P x) x ↔ Q x ∧ (Minimal P x) := by
simp_rw [iff_comm, and_comm, minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp hPQ, and_comm]
theorem maximal_and_iff_right_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Maximal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x ↔ (Maximal P x) ∧ Q x :=
minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ
theorem maximal_and_iff_left_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Maximal (fun x ↦ Q x ∧ P x) x ↔ Q x ∧ (Maximal P x) :=
minimal_and_iff_left_of_imp (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem minimal_iff_forall_lt : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y < x → ¬ P y := by
simp [Minimal, lt_iff_le_not_le, not_imp_not, imp.swap]
theorem maximal_iff_forall_gt : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, x < y → ¬ P y :=
minimal_iff_forall_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Minimal.not_prop_of_lt (h : Minimal P x) (hlt : y < x) : ¬ P y :=
(minimal_iff_forall_lt.1 h).2 hlt
theorem Maximal.not_prop_of_gt (h : Maximal P x) (hlt : x < y) : ¬ P y :=
(maximal_iff_forall_gt.1 h).2 hlt
theorem Minimal.not_lt (h : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) : ¬ (y < x) :=
fun hlt ↦ h.not_prop_of_lt hlt hy
theorem Maximal.not_gt (h : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) : ¬ (x < y) :=
fun hlt ↦ h.not_prop_of_gt hlt hy
@[simp] theorem minimal_le_iff : Minimal (· ≤ y) x ↔ x ≤ y ∧ IsMin x :=
minimal_iff_isMin (fun _ _ h h' ↦ h'.trans h)
@[simp] theorem maximal_ge_iff : Maximal (y ≤ ·) x ↔ y ≤ x ∧ IsMax x :=
minimal_le_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem minimal_lt_iff : Minimal (· < y) x ↔ x < y ∧ IsMin x :=
minimal_iff_isMin (fun _ _ h h' ↦ h'.trans_lt h)
| @[simp] theorem maximal_gt_iff : Maximal (y < ·) x ↔ y < x ∧ IsMax x :=
minimal_lt_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
| Mathlib/Order/Minimal.lean | 194 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.ConjTranspose
/-!
# Row and column matrices
This file provides results about row and column matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.replicateRow ι r : Matrix ι n α`: the matrix where every row is the vector `r : n → α`
* `Matrix.replicateCol ι c : Matrix m ι α`: the matrix where every column is the vector `c : m → α`
* `Matrix.updateRow M i r`: update the `i`th row of `M` to `r`
* `Matrix.updateCol M j c`: update the `j`th column of `M` to `c`
-/
variable {l m n o : Type*}
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
namespace Matrix
/--
`Matrix.replicateCol ι u` is the matrix with all columns equal to the vector `u`.
To get a column matrix with exactly one column,
`Matrix.replicateCol (Fin 1) u` is the canonical choice.
-/
def replicateCol (ι : Type*) (w : m → α) : Matrix m ι α :=
of fun x _ => w x
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `replicateCol`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem replicateCol_apply {ι : Type*} (w : m → α) (i) (j : ι) : replicateCol ι w i j = w i :=
rfl
/--
`Matrix.replicateRow ι u` is the matrix with all rows equal to the vector `u`.
To get a row matrix with exactly one row, `Matrix.replicateRow (Fin 1) u` is the canonical choice.
-/
def replicateRow (ι : Type*) (v : n → α) : Matrix ι n α :=
of fun _ y => v y
variable {ι : Type*}
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `replicateRow`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem replicateRow_apply (v : n → α) (i : ι) (j) : replicateRow ι v i j = v j :=
rfl
theorem replicateCol_injective [Nonempty ι] :
Function.Injective (replicateCol ι : (m → α) → Matrix m ι α) := by
inhabit ι
exact fun _x _y h => funext fun i => congr_fun₂ h i default
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_injective := replicateCol_injective
@[simp] theorem replicateCol_inj [Nonempty ι] {v w : m → α} :
replicateCol ι v = replicateCol ι w ↔ v = w :=
replicateCol_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_inj := replicateCol_inj
@[simp] theorem replicateCol_zero [Zero α] : replicateCol ι (0 : m → α) = 0 := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_zero := replicateCol_zero
@[simp] theorem replicateCol_eq_zero [Zero α] [Nonempty ι] (v : m → α) :
replicateCol ι v = 0 ↔ v = 0 :=
replicateCol_inj
|
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_eq_zero := replicateCol_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/RowCol.lean | 78 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.IndexNormal
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Rotate
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Alternating Groups
The alternating group on a finite type `α` is the subgroup of the permutation group `Perm α`
consisting of the even permutations.
## Main definitions
* `alternatingGroup α` is the alternating group on `α`, defined as a `Subgroup (Perm α)`.
## Main results
* `alternatingGroup.index_eq_two` shows that the index of the alternating group is two.
* `two_mul_card_alternatingGroup` shows that the alternating group is half as large as
the permutation group it is a subgroup of.
* `closure_three_cycles_eq_alternating` shows that the alternating group is
generated by 3-cycles.
* `alternatingGroup.isSimpleGroup_five` shows that the alternating group on `Fin 5` is simple.
The proof shows that the normal closure of any non-identity element of this group contains a
3-cycle.
* `Equiv.Perm.eq_alternatingGroup_of_index_eq_two` shows that a subgroup of index 2
of `Equiv.Perm α` is the alternating group.
* `Equiv.Perm.alternatingGroup_le_of_index_le_two` shows that a subgroup of index at most 2
of `Equiv.Perm α` contains the alternating group.
## Instances
* The alternating group is a characteristic subgroup of the permutaiton group.
## Tags
alternating group permutation simple characteristic index
## TODO
* Show that `alternatingGroup α` is simple if and only if `Fintype.card α ≠ 4`.
-/
-- An example on how to determine the order of an element of a finite group.
example : orderOf (-1 : ℤˣ) = 2 :=
orderOf_eq_prime (Int.units_sq _) (by decide)
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Subgroup Fintype
variable (α : Type*) [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α]
/-- The alternating group on a finite type, realized as a subgroup of `Equiv.Perm`.
For $A_n$, use `alternatingGroup (Fin n)`. -/
def alternatingGroup : Subgroup (Perm α) :=
sign.ker
instance alternatingGroup.instFintype : Fintype (alternatingGroup α) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ _ sign.decidableMemKer _
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (alternatingGroup α) :=
⟨⟨1⟩, fun ⟨p, _⟩ => Subtype.eq (Subsingleton.elim p _)⟩
variable {α}
theorem alternatingGroup_eq_sign_ker : alternatingGroup α = sign.ker :=
rfl
namespace Equiv.Perm
@[simp]
theorem mem_alternatingGroup {f : Perm α} : f ∈ alternatingGroup α ↔ sign f = 1 :=
sign.mem_ker
theorem prod_list_swap_mem_alternatingGroup_iff_even_length {l : List (Perm α)}
(hl : ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g) : l.prod ∈ alternatingGroup α ↔ Even l.length := by
rw [mem_alternatingGroup, sign_prod_list_swap hl, neg_one_pow_eq_one_iff_even]
decide
theorem IsThreeCycle.mem_alternatingGroup {f : Perm α} (h : IsThreeCycle f) :
f ∈ alternatingGroup α :=
Perm.mem_alternatingGroup.mpr h.sign
theorem finRotate_bit1_mem_alternatingGroup {n : ℕ} :
finRotate (2 * n + 1) ∈ alternatingGroup (Fin (2 * n + 1)) := by
rw [mem_alternatingGroup, sign_finRotate, pow_mul, pow_two, Int.units_mul_self, one_pow]
end Equiv.Perm
@[simp]
theorem alternatingGroup.index_eq_two [Nontrivial α] :
(alternatingGroup α).index = 2 := by
rw [alternatingGroup, index_ker, MonoidHom.range_eq_top.mpr (sign_surjective α)]
simp_rw [mem_top, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, card_subtype_true, card_units_int]
@[nontriviality]
theorem alternatingGroup.index_eq_one [Subsingleton α] : (alternatingGroup α).index = 1 := by
rw [Subgroup.index_eq_one]; apply Subsingleton.elim
theorem two_mul_card_alternatingGroup [Nontrivial α] :
2 * card (alternatingGroup α) = card (Perm α) := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← alternatingGroup.index_eq_two (α := α), index_mul_card]
namespace alternatingGroup
open Equiv.Perm
instance normal : (alternatingGroup α).Normal :=
sign.normal_ker
theorem isConj_of {σ τ : alternatingGroup α} (hc : IsConj (σ : Perm α) (τ : Perm α))
(hσ : (σ : Perm α).support.card + 2 ≤ Fintype.card α) : IsConj σ τ := by
obtain ⟨σ, hσ⟩ := σ
obtain ⟨τ, hτ⟩ := τ
obtain ⟨π, hπ⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk] at hπ
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or (Perm.sign π) with h | h
· rw [isConj_iff]
refine ⟨⟨π, mem_alternatingGroup.mp h⟩, Subtype.val_injective ?_⟩
simpa only [Subtype.val, Subgroup.coe_mul, coe_inv, coe_mk] using hπ
· have h2 : 2 ≤ σ.supportᶜ.card := by
rw [Finset.card_compl, le_tsub_iff_left σ.support.card_le_univ]
exact hσ
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, ab⟩ := Finset.one_lt_card.1 h2
refine isConj_iff.2 ⟨⟨π * swap a b, ?_⟩, Subtype.val_injective ?_⟩
· rw [mem_alternatingGroup, MonoidHom.map_mul, h, sign_swap ab, Int.units_mul_self]
· simp only [← hπ, coe_mk, Subgroup.coe_mul, Subtype.val]
have hd : Disjoint (swap a b) σ := by
rw [disjoint_iff_disjoint_support, support_swap ab, Finset.disjoint_insert_left,
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_compl.1 ha, Finset.mem_compl.1 hb⟩
rw [mul_assoc π _ σ, hd.commute.eq, coe_inv, coe_mk]
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem isThreeCycle_isConj (h5 : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α) {σ τ : alternatingGroup α}
(hσ : IsThreeCycle (σ : Perm α)) (hτ : IsThreeCycle (τ : Perm α)) : IsConj σ τ :=
alternatingGroup.isConj_of (isConj_iff_cycleType_eq.2 (hσ.trans hτ.symm))
(by rwa [hσ.card_support])
end alternatingGroup
namespace Equiv.Perm
open alternatingGroup
@[simp]
theorem closure_three_cycles_eq_alternating :
closure { σ : Perm α | IsThreeCycle σ } = alternatingGroup α :=
closure_eq_of_le _ (fun _ hσ => mem_alternatingGroup.2 hσ.sign) fun σ hσ => by
suffices hind :
∀ (n : ℕ) (l : List (Perm α)) (_ : ∀ g, g ∈ l → IsSwap g) (_ : l.length = 2 * n),
l.prod ∈ closure { σ : Perm α | IsThreeCycle σ } by
obtain ⟨l, rfl, hl⟩ := truncSwapFactors σ
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (prod_list_swap_mem_alternatingGroup_iff_even_length hl).1 hσ
rw [← two_mul] at hn
exact hind n l hl hn
intro n
induction' n with n ih <;> intro l hl hn
· simp [List.length_eq_zero_iff.1 hn, one_mem]
rw [Nat.mul_succ] at hn
obtain ⟨a, l, rfl⟩ := l.exists_of_length_succ hn
rw [List.length_cons, Nat.succ_inj] at hn
obtain ⟨b, l, rfl⟩ := l.exists_of_length_succ hn
rw [List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, ← mul_assoc]
rw [List.length_cons, Nat.succ_inj] at hn
exact
mul_mem
(IsSwap.mul_mem_closure_three_cycles (hl a List.mem_cons_self)
(hl b (List.mem_cons_of_mem a List.mem_cons_self)))
(ih _ (fun g hg => hl g (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg))) hn)
/-- A key lemma to prove $A_5$ is simple. Shows that any normal subgroup of an alternating group on
at least 5 elements is the entire alternating group if it contains a 3-cycle. -/
theorem IsThreeCycle.alternating_normalClosure (h5 : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α) {f : Perm α}
(hf : IsThreeCycle f) :
normalClosure ({⟨f, hf.mem_alternatingGroup⟩} : Set (alternatingGroup α)) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2
(by
have hi : Function.Injective (alternatingGroup α).subtype := Subtype.coe_injective
refine eq_top_iff.1 (map_injective hi (le_antisymm (map_mono le_top) ?_))
rw [← MonoidHom.range_eq_map, range_subtype, normalClosure, MonoidHom.map_closure]
refine (le_of_eq closure_three_cycles_eq_alternating.symm).trans (closure_mono ?_)
intro g h
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 (isConj_iff_cycleType_eq.2 (hf.trans h.symm))
refine ⟨⟨c * f * c⁻¹, h.mem_alternatingGroup⟩, ?_, rfl⟩
rw [Group.mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff]
exact ⟨⟨f, hf.mem_alternatingGroup⟩, Set.mem_singleton _, isThreeCycle_isConj h5 hf h⟩)
/-- Part of proving $A_5$ is simple. Shows that the square of any element of $A_5$ with a 3-cycle in
its cycle decomposition is a 3-cycle, so the normal closure of the original element must be
$A_5$. -/
theorem isThreeCycle_sq_of_three_mem_cycleType_five {g : Perm (Fin 5)} (h : 3 ∈ cycleType g) :
IsThreeCycle (g * g) := by
obtain ⟨c, g', rfl, hd, _, h3⟩ := mem_cycleType_iff.1 h
simp only [mul_assoc]
rw [hd.commute.eq, ← mul_assoc g']
suffices hg' : orderOf g' ∣ 2 by
rw [← pow_two, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.1 hg', one_mul]
exact (card_support_eq_three_iff.1 h3).isThreeCycle_sq
rw [← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
intro n hn
rw [le_antisymm (two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn) (le_trans (le_card_support_of_mem_cycleType hn) _)]
apply le_of_add_le_add_left
rw [← hd.card_support_mul, h3]
exact (c * g').support.card_le_univ
end Equiv.Perm
namespace alternatingGroup
open Equiv.Perm
theorem eq_bot_of_card_le_two (h2 : card α ≤ 2) : alternatingGroup α = ⊥ := by
nontriviality α
suffices hα' : card α = 2 by
rw [Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_card, ← Nat.mul_right_inj (a := 2) (by norm_num),
Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, two_mul_card_alternatingGroup, mul_one, card_perm, hα',
Nat.factorial_two]
exact h2.antisymm Fintype.one_lt_card
theorem nontrivial_of_three_le_card (h3 : 3 ≤ card α) : Nontrivial (alternatingGroup α) := by
haveI := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (lt_trans (by decide) h3)
rw [← Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ?_ (le_of_lt Nat.prime_two.pos)
rw [two_mul_card_alternatingGroup, card_perm, ← Nat.succ_le_iff]
exact le_trans h3 (card α).self_le_factorial
instance {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (alternatingGroup (Fin (n + 3))) :=
nontrivial_of_three_le_card
(by
rw [card_fin]
exact le_add_left (le_refl 3))
/-- The normal closure of the 5-cycle `finRotate 5` within $A_5$ is the whole group. This will be
used to show that the normal closure of any 5-cycle within $A_5$ is the whole group. -/
theorem normalClosure_finRotate_five : normalClosure ({⟨finRotate 5,
finRotate_bit1_mem_alternatingGroup (n := 2)⟩} : Set (alternatingGroup (Fin 5))) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2
(by
have h3 :
IsThreeCycle (Fin.cycleRange 2 * finRotate 5 * (Fin.cycleRange 2)⁻¹ * (finRotate 5)⁻¹) :=
card_support_eq_three_iff.1 (by decide)
rw [← h3.alternating_normalClosure (by rw [card_fin])]
refine normalClosure_le_normal ?_
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
have h :
(⟨finRotate 5, finRotate_bit1_mem_alternatingGroup (n := 2)⟩ : alternatingGroup (Fin 5)) ∈
normalClosure _ :=
SetLike.mem_coe.1 (subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _))
-- Porting note: added `:` to help the elaborator
exact (mul_mem (Subgroup.normalClosure_normal.conj_mem _ h
⟨Fin.cycleRange 2, Fin.isThreeCycle_cycleRange_two.mem_alternatingGroup⟩) (inv_mem h) :))
/-- The normal closure of $(04)(13)$ within $A_5$ is the whole group. This will be
used to show that the normal closure of any permutation of cycle type $(2,2)$ is the whole group.
-/
theorem normalClosure_swap_mul_swap_five :
normalClosure
({⟨swap 0 4 * swap 1 3, mem_alternatingGroup.2 (by decide)⟩} :
Set (alternatingGroup (Fin 5))) =
⊤ := by
let g1 := (⟨swap 0 2 * swap 0 1, mem_alternatingGroup.2 (by decide)⟩ : alternatingGroup (Fin 5))
let g2 := (⟨swap 0 4 * swap 1 3, mem_alternatingGroup.2 (by decide)⟩ : alternatingGroup (Fin 5))
have h5 : g1 * g2 * g1⁻¹ * g2⁻¹ =
⟨finRotate 5, finRotate_bit1_mem_alternatingGroup (n := 2)⟩ := by
rw [Subtype.ext_iff]
simp only [Fin.val_mk, Subgroup.coe_mul, Subgroup.coe_inv, Fin.val_mk]
decide
| rw [eq_top_iff, ← normalClosure_finRotate_five]
refine normalClosure_le_normal ?_
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe, ← h5]
have h : g2 ∈ normalClosure {g2} :=
SetLike.mem_coe.1 (subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _))
exact mul_mem (Subgroup.normalClosure_normal.conj_mem _ h g1) (inv_mem h)
/-- Shows that any non-identity element of $A_5$ whose cycle decomposition consists only of swaps
is conjugate to $(04)(13)$. This is used to show that the normal closure of such a permutation
in $A_5$ is $A_5$. -/
theorem isConj_swap_mul_swap_of_cycleType_two {g : Perm (Fin 5)} (ha : g ∈ alternatingGroup (Fin 5))
(h1 : g ≠ 1) (h2 : ∀ n, n ∈ cycleType (g : Perm (Fin 5)) → n = 2) :
IsConj (swap 0 4 * swap 1 3) g := by
have h := g.support.card_le_univ
rw [← Multiset.eq_replicate_card] at h2
rw [← sum_cycleType, h2, Multiset.sum_replicate, smul_eq_mul] at h
have h : Multiset.card g.cycleType ≤ 3 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right (le_trans h (by norm_num only [card_fin])) (by simp)
rw [mem_alternatingGroup, sign_of_cycleType, h2] at ha
norm_num at ha
rw [pow_add, pow_mul, Int.units_pow_two, one_mul, neg_one_pow_eq_one_iff_even] at ha
swap; · decide
rw [isConj_iff_cycleType_eq, h2]
interval_cases h_1 : Multiset.card g.cycleType
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/Alternating.lean | 280 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
@[simp] lemma IsClosed.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsClosed (s ∩ t) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isClosedMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
end SetNotation
end Subtype
section Quotient
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {r : X → X → Prop} {s : Setoid X}
theorem isQuotientMap_quot_mk : IsQuotientMap (@Quot.mk X r) :=
⟨Quot.exists_rep, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quot_mk := isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_mk : Continuous (@Quot.mk X r) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_quot_lift {f : X → Y} (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b) (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (Quot.lift f hr : Quot r → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem isQuotientMap_quotient_mk' : IsQuotientMap (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_quotient_mk' := isQuotientMap_quotient_mk'
theorem continuous_quotient_mk' : Continuous (@Quotient.mk' X s) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem Continuous.quotient_lift {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (Quotient.lift f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
continuous_coinduced_dom.2 h
theorem Continuous.quotient_liftOn' {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f)
(hs : ∀ a b, s a b → f a = f b) :
Continuous (fun x => Quotient.liftOn' x f hs : Quotient s → Y) :=
h.quotient_lift hs
open scoped Relator in
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.quotient_map' {t : Setoid Y} {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(H : (s.r ⇒ t.r) f f) : Continuous (Quotient.map' f H) :=
(continuous_quotient_mk'.comp hf).quotient_lift _
end Quotient
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} {κ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[T : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {f : X → ∀ i : ι, π i}
theorem continuous_pi_iff : Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i := by
simp only [continuous_iInf_rng, continuous_induced_rng, comp_def]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_pi (h : ∀ i, Continuous fun a => f a i) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi_iff.2 h
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_apply (i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i :=
continuous_iInf_dom continuous_induced_dom
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_apply_apply {ρ : κ → ι → Type*} [∀ j i, TopologicalSpace (ρ j i)] (j : κ)
(i : ι) : Continuous fun p : ∀ j, ∀ i, ρ j i => p j i :=
(continuous_apply i).comp (continuous_apply j)
theorem continuousAt_apply (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, π i) : ContinuousAt (fun p : ∀ i, π i => p i) x :=
(continuous_apply i).continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.apply_nhds {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) : Tendsto (fun a => f a i) l (𝓝 <| x i) :=
(continuousAt_apply i _).tendsto.comp h
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Continuous.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, Continuous (f i)) : Continuous (Pi.map f) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuous_apply i)
theorem nhds_pi {a : ∀ i, π i} : 𝓝 a = pi fun i => 𝓝 (a i) := by
simp only [nhds_iInf, nhds_induced, Filter.pi]
protected theorem IsOpenMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)] {f : ∀ i, π i → Y i}
(hfo : ∀ i, IsOpenMap (f i)) (hsurj : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) :
IsOpenMap (Pi.map f) := by
refine IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_pi, nhds_pi, map_piMap_pi hsurj]
exact Filter.pi_mono fun i ↦ (hfo i).nhds_le _
protected theorem IsOpenQuotientMap.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} (hf : ∀ i, IsOpenQuotientMap (f i)) : IsOpenQuotientMap (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2, .piMap (fun i ↦ (hf i).3) <|
.of_forall fun i ↦ (hf i).1⟩
theorem tendsto_pi_nhds {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {g : ∀ i, π i} {u : Filter Y} :
Tendsto f u (𝓝 g) ↔ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun i => f i x) u (𝓝 (g x)) := by
rw [nhds_pi, Filter.tendsto_pi]
theorem continuousAt_pi {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_pi' {f : X → ∀ i, π i} {x : X} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (fun y => f y i) x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem ContinuousAt.piMap {Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : ∀ i, π i → Y i} {x : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousAt (f i) (x i)) :
ContinuousAt (Pi.map f) x :=
continuousAt_pi.2 fun i ↦ (hf i).comp (continuousAt_apply i x)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) :=
continuous_pi fun j ↦ continuous_apply (φ j)
theorem Pi.continuous_precomp {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
Continuous (· ∘ φ : (ι → X) → (ι' → X)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' φ
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp' {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{g : ∀ i, π i → X i} (hg : ∀ i, Continuous (g i)) :
Continuous (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (i : ι) ↦ g i (f i)) :=
continuous_pi fun i ↦ (hg i).comp <| continuous_apply i
theorem Pi.continuous_postcomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : X → Y} (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (g ∘ · : (ι → X) → (ι → Y)) :=
Pi.continuous_postcomp' fun _ ↦ hg
lemma Pi.induced_precomp' {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (fun (f : (∀ i, π i)) (j : ι') ↦ f (φ j)) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) (T (φ i')) := by
simp [Pi.topologicalSpace, induced_iInf, induced_compose, comp_def]
lemma Pi.induced_precomp [TopologicalSpace Y] {ι' : Type*} (φ : ι' → ι) :
induced (· ∘ φ) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i', induced (eval (φ i')) ‹TopologicalSpace Y› :=
induced_precomp' φ
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict (S : Set ι) :
Continuous (S.restrict : (∀ i : ι, π i) → (∀ i : S, π i)) :=
Pi.continuous_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Pi.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Set ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict (s : Finset ι) : Continuous (s.restrict (π := π)) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂ {s t : Finset ι} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
Continuous (Finset.restrict₂ (π := π) hst) :=
continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _
variable [TopologicalSpace Z]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Set X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Pi.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Set X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict_apply (s : Finset X) {f : X → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrict f) := hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Finset.continuous_restrict₂_apply {s t : Finset X} (hst : s ⊆ t)
{f : t → Z} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (restrict₂ (π := fun _ ↦ Z) hst f) := hf.comp (continuous_inclusion hst)
lemma Pi.induced_restrict (S : Set ι) :
induced (S.restrict) Pi.topologicalSpace =
⨅ i ∈ S, induced (eval i) (T i) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [← iInf_subtype'', ← induced_precomp' ((↑) : S → ι),
restrict]
lemma Pi.induced_restrict_sUnion (𝔖 : Set (Set ι)) :
induced (⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict (Pi.topologicalSpace (Y := fun i : (⋃₀ 𝔖) ↦ π i)) =
⨅ S ∈ 𝔖, induced S.restrict Pi.topologicalSpace := by
simp_rw [Pi.induced_restrict, iInf_sUnion]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.update [DecidableEq ι] {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → ∀ i, π i} {x : ∀ i, π i}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (i : ι) {g : Y → π i} {xi : π i} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 xi)) :
Tendsto (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) l (𝓝 <| update x i xi) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => by rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hj) <;> simp [*, hf.apply_nhds]
theorem ContinuousAt.update [DecidableEq ι] {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : ContinuousAt g x) : ContinuousAt (fun a => update (f a) i (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.update i hg
theorem Continuous.update [DecidableEq ι] (hf : Continuous f) (i : ι) {g : X → π i}
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => update (f a) i (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.update i hg.continuousAt
/-- `Function.update f i x` is continuous in `(f, x)`. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_update [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun f : (∀ j, π j) × π i => update f.1 i f.2 :=
continuous_fst.update i continuous_snd
/-- `Pi.mulSingle i x` is continuous in `x`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) "`Pi.single i x` is continuous in `x`."]
theorem continuous_mulSingle [∀ i, One (π i)] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Continuous fun x => (Pi.mulSingle i x : ∀ i, π i) :=
continuous_const.update _ continuous_id
section Fin
variable {n : ℕ} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finCons
{f : Y → π 0} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.succ} {l : Filter Y} {x : π 0} {y : ∀ j, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.cons x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.cases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.finCons {f : X → π 0} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (Fin.succ j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.cons (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finCons hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.matrixVecCons
{f : Y → Z} {g : Y → Fin n → Z} {l : Filter Y} {x : Z} {y : Fin n → Z}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Matrix.vecCons x y) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem ContinuousAt.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Continuous.matrixVecCons
{f : X → Z} {g : X → Fin n → Z} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun a => Matrix.vecCons (f a) (g a) :=
hf.finCons hg
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finSnoc
{f : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : Y → π (Fin.last _)}
{l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π (Fin.castSucc j)} {y : π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.snoc x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.lastCases (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hf) j
theorem ContinuousAt.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finSnoc hg
theorem Continuous.finSnoc {f : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π j.castSucc} {g : X → π (Fin.last _)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => Fin.snoc (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finSnoc hg.continuousAt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : Y → π i} {g : Y → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {l : Filter Y}
{x : π i} {y : ∀ j, π (i.succAbove j)} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) l (𝓝 <| i.insertNth x y) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j => Fin.succAboveCases i (by simpa) (by simpa using tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hg) j
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Filter.Tendsto.fin_insertNth := Filter.Tendsto.finInsertNth
theorem ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
ContinuousAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInsertNth i hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias ContinuousAt.fin_insertNth := ContinuousAt.finInsertNth
theorem Continuous.finInsertNth
(i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : X → π i} {g : X → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => hf.continuousAt.finInsertNth i hg.continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-02")]
alias Continuous.fin_insertNth := Continuous.finInsertNth
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finInit {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.init x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.castSucc
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finInit
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finInit {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.init (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finInit
theorem Filter.Tendsto.finTail {f : Y → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {l : Filter Y} {x : ∀ j, π j}
(hg : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) l (𝓝 <| Fin.tail x) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun j ↦ apply_nhds hg j.succ
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} {x : X}
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a)) x :=
hf.tendsto.finTail
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.finTail {f : X → ∀ j : Fin (n + 1), π j} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun a ↦ Fin.tail (f a) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ hf.continuousAt.finTail
end Fin
theorem isOpen_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hi : i.Finite)
(hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsOpen (s a)) : IsOpen (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact hi.isOpen_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
theorem isOpen_pi_iff {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ (I : Finset ι) (u : ∀ a, Set (π a)),
(∀ a, a ∈ I → IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ (I : Set ι).pi u ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine ⟨I, fun a => eval a '' (I : Set ι).pi fun a => (h1 a).choose, fun i hi => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [eval_image_pi (Finset.mem_coe.mpr hi)
(pi_nonempty_iff.mpr fun i => ⟨_, fun _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.2.2⟩)]
exact (h1 i).choose_spec.2
· exact Subset.trans
(pi_mono fun i hi => (eval_image_pi_subset hi).trans (h1 i).choose_spec.1) h2
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
classical
refine ⟨I, fun a => ite (a ∈ I) (t a) univ, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· use t i
simp_rw [if_pos hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, (h1 i) hi⟩
· use univ
simp_rw [if_neg hi]
exact ⟨Subset.rfl, isOpen_univ, mem_univ _⟩
· rw [← univ_pi_ite]
simp only [← ite_and, ← Finset.mem_coe, and_self_iff, univ_pi_ite, h2]
theorem isOpen_pi_iff' [Finite ι] {s : Set (∀ a, π a)} :
IsOpen s ↔
∀ f, f ∈ s → ∃ u : ∀ a, Set (π a), (∀ a, IsOpen (u a) ∧ f a ∈ u a) ∧ univ.pi u ⊆ s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [isOpen_iff_nhds]
simp_rw [le_principal_iff, nhds_pi, Filter.mem_pi', mem_nhds_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun a _ => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨I, t, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
refine
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose,
⟨fun i => (h1 i).choose_spec.2,
(pi_mono fun i _ => (h1 i).choose_spec.1).trans (Subset.trans ?_ h2)⟩⟩
rw [← pi_inter_compl (I : Set ι)]
exact inter_subset_left
| · exact fun ⟨u, ⟨h1, _⟩⟩ =>
⟨Finset.univ, u, ⟨fun i => ⟨u i, ⟨rfl.subset, h1 i⟩⟩, by rwa [Finset.coe_univ]⟩⟩
theorem isClosed_set_pi {i : Set ι} {s : ∀ a, Set (π a)} (hs : ∀ a ∈ i, IsClosed (s a)) :
IsClosed (pi i s) := by
rw [pi_def]; exact isClosed_biInter fun a ha => (hs _ ha).preimage (continuous_apply _)
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 900 | 905 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.PrimePow
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Nat
/-!
# Lemmas about squarefreeness of natural numbers
A number is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares except the squares of units.
## Main Results
- `Nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList`: A positive natural number `x` is squarefree iff
the list `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
theorem squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
Squarefree n ↔ n.primeFactorsList.Nodup := by
rw [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors h0, Nat.factors_eq]
simp
end Nat
theorem Squarefree.nodup_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) : n.primeFactorsList.Nodup :=
(Nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList hn.ne_zero).mp hn
namespace Nat
variable {s : Finset ℕ} {m n p : ℕ}
theorem squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ↔ ∀ x, Prime x → ¬x * x ∣ n :=
squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible ⟨_, prime_two⟩
theorem _root_.Squarefree.natFactorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : Squarefree n) :
n.factorization p ≤ 1 := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn')
· simp
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one] at hn
by_cases hp : p.Prime
· have := hn p
rw [← multiplicity_eq_factorization hp hn']
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff, hp.ne_one, or_false] at this
exact multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le this
· rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
exact zero_le_one
lemma factorization_eq_one_of_squarefree (hn : Squarefree n) (hp : p.Prime) (hpn : p ∣ n) :
factorization n p = 1 :=
(hn.natFactorization_le_one _).antisymm <| (hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hn.ne_zero).1 hpn
theorem squarefree_of_factorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hn' : ∀ p, n.factorization p ≤ 1) :
Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList hn, List.nodup_iff_count_le_one]
intro a
rw [primeFactorsList_count_eq]
apply hn'
theorem squarefree_iff_factorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
Squarefree n ↔ ∀ p, n.factorization p ≤ 1 :=
⟨fun hn => hn.natFactorization_le_one, squarefree_of_factorization_le_one hn⟩
theorem Squarefree.ext_iff {n m : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) (hm : Squarefree m) :
n = m ↔ ∀ p, Prime p → (p ∣ n ↔ p ∣ m) := by
refine ⟨by rintro rfl; simp, fun h => eq_of_factorization_eq hn.ne_zero hm.ne_zero fun p => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p.Prime
· have h₁ := h _ hp
rw [← not_iff_not, hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hn.ne_zero, not_le, lt_one_iff,
hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hm.ne_zero, not_le, lt_one_iff] at h₁
have h₂ := hn.natFactorization_le_one p
have h₃ := hm.natFactorization_le_one p
omega
rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp, factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
theorem squarefree_pow_iff {n k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
Squarefree (n ^ k) ↔ Squarefree n ∧ k = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by rintro ⟨hn, rfl⟩; simpa⟩
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | -)
· simp [zero_pow hk] at h
refine ⟨h.squarefree_of_dvd (dvd_pow_self _ hk), by_contradiction fun h₁ => ?_⟩
have : 2 ≤ k := k.two_le_iff.mpr ⟨hk, h₁⟩
apply hn (Nat.isUnit_iff.1 (h _ _))
rw [← sq]
exact pow_dvd_pow _ this
theorem squarefree_and_prime_pow_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ∧ IsPrimePow n ↔ Prime n := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hn => ⟨hn.squarefree, hn.isPrimePow⟩⟩
rw [isPrimePow_nat_iff]
rintro ⟨h, p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩
rw [squarefree_pow_iff hp.ne_one hk.ne'] at h
rwa [h.2, pow_one]
/-- Assuming that `n` has no factors less than `k`, returns the smallest prime `p` such that
`p^2 ∣ n`. -/
def minSqFacAux : ℕ → ℕ → Option ℕ
| n, k =>
if h : n < k * k then none
else
have : Nat.sqrt n - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k := by
exact Nat.minFac_lemma n k h
if k ∣ n then
let n' := n / k
have : Nat.sqrt n' - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt <| Nat.div_le_self _ _) k) this
if k ∣ n' then some k else minSqFacAux n' (k + 2)
else minSqFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by n k => sqrt n + 2 - k
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor `p` of `n` such that `p^2 ∣ n`, or `none` if there is no
such `p` (that is, `n` is squarefree). See also `Nat.squarefree_iff_minSqFac`. -/
def minSqFac (n : ℕ) : Option ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then
let n' := n / 2
if 2 ∣ n' then some 2 else minSqFacAux n' 3
else minSqFacAux n 3
/-- The correctness property of the return value of `minSqFac`.
* If `none`, then `n` is squarefree;
* If `some d`, then `d` is a minimal square factor of `n` -/
def MinSqFacProp (n : ℕ) : Option ℕ → Prop
| none => Squarefree n
| some d => Prime d ∧ d * d ∣ n ∧ ∀ p, Prime p → p * p ∣ n → d ≤ p
theorem minSqFacProp_div (n) {k} (pk : Prime k) (dk : k ∣ n) (dkk : ¬k * k ∣ n) {o}
(H : MinSqFacProp (n / k) o) : MinSqFacProp n o := by
have : ∀ p, Prime p → p * p ∣ n → k * (p * p) ∣ n := fun p pp dp =>
have :=
(coprime_primes pk pp).2 fun e => by
subst e
contradiction
(coprime_mul_iff_right.2 ⟨this, this⟩).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd dk dp
rcases o with - | d
· rw [MinSqFacProp, squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree] at H ⊢
exact fun p pp dp => H p pp ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).2 (this _ pp dp))
· obtain ⟨H1, H2, H3⟩ := H
simp only [dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk] at H2 H3
exact ⟨H1, dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) H2, fun p pp dp => H3 _ pp (this _ pp dp)⟩
theorem minSqFacAux_has_prop {n : ℕ} (k) (n0 : 0 < n) (i) (e : k = 2 * i + 3)
(ih : ∀ m, Prime m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m) : MinSqFacProp n (minSqFacAux n k) := by
rw [minSqFacAux]
by_cases h : n < k * k <;> simp only [h, ↓reduceDIte]
· refine squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree.2 fun p pp d => ?_
have := ih p pp (dvd_trans ⟨_, rfl⟩ d)
have := Nat.mul_le_mul this this
exact not_le_of_lt h (le_trans this (le_of_dvd n0 d))
have k2 : 2 ≤ k := by omega
have k0 : 0 < k := lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) k2
have IH : ∀ n', n' ∣ n → ¬k ∣ n' → MinSqFacProp n' (n'.minSqFacAux (k + 2)) := by
intro n' nd' nk
have hn' := le_of_dvd n0 nd'
refine
have : Nat.sqrt n' - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt hn') _) (Nat.minFac_lemma n k h)
@minSqFacAux_has_prop n' (k + 2) (pos_of_dvd_of_pos nd' n0) (i + 1)
(by simp [e, left_distrib]) fun m m2 d => ?_
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (ih m m2 (dvd_trans d nd')) with me | ml
· subst me
contradiction
apply (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ml).resolve_left
intro me
rw [← me, e] at d
change 2 * (i + 2) ∣ n' at d
have := ih _ prime_two (dvd_trans (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd d) nd')
rw [e] at this
exact absurd this (by omega)
have pk : k ∣ n → Prime k := by
refine fun dk => prime_def_minFac.2 ⟨k2, le_antisymm (minFac_le k0) ?_⟩
exact ih _ (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt k2)) (dvd_trans (minFac_dvd _) dk)
split_ifs with dk dkk
· exact ⟨pk dk, (Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).1 dkk, fun p pp d => ih p pp (dvd_trans ⟨_, rfl⟩ d)⟩
· specialize IH (n / k) (div_dvd_of_dvd dk) dkk
exact minSqFacProp_div _ (pk dk) dk (mt (Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).2 dkk) IH
· exact IH n (dvd_refl _) dk
termination_by n.sqrt + 2 - k
theorem minSqFac_has_prop (n : ℕ) : MinSqFacProp n (minSqFac n) := by
dsimp only [minSqFac]; split_ifs with d2 d4
· exact ⟨prime_two, (dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd d2).1 d4, fun p pp _ => pp.two_le⟩
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with n0 | n0
· subst n0
cases d4 (by decide)
refine minSqFacProp_div _ prime_two d2 (mt (dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd d2).2 d4) ?_
refine minSqFacAux_has_prop 3 (Nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd n0 d2) (by decide)) 0 rfl ?_
refine fun p pp dp => succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne pp.two_le ?_)
rintro rfl
contradiction
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with n0 | n0
· subst n0
cases d2 (by decide)
refine minSqFacAux_has_prop _ n0 0 rfl ?_
refine fun p pp dp => succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne pp.two_le ?_)
rintro rfl
contradiction
theorem minSqFac_prime {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) : Prime d := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
rw [h] at this
exact this.1
theorem minSqFac_dvd {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) : d * d ∣ n := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
rw [h] at this
exact this.2.1
theorem minSqFac_le_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) {m} (m2 : 2 ≤ m) (md : m * m ∣ n) :
d ≤ m := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n; rw [h] at this
have fd := minFac_dvd m
exact
le_trans (this.2.2 _ (minFac_prime <| ne_of_gt m2) (dvd_trans (mul_dvd_mul fd fd) md))
(minFac_le <| lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) m2)
theorem squarefree_iff_minSqFac {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ↔ n.minSqFac = none := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
constructor <;> intro H
· rcases e : n.minSqFac with - | d
· rfl
rw [e] at this
cases squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree.1 H _ this.1 this.2.1
· rwa [H] at this
instance : DecidablePred (Squarefree : ℕ → Prop) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ squarefree_iff_minSqFac
theorem squarefree_two : Squarefree 2 := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList] <;> simp
theorem divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | Squarefree d} = n.divisors :=
Finset.ext fun d => ⟨@Finset.filter_subset _ _ _ _ d, fun hd =>
Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨hd, hn.squarefree_of_dvd (Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors hd) ⟩⟩
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | Squarefree d}.val =
(UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors n).toFinset.powerset.val.map fun x =>
x.val.prod := by
rw [(Finset.nodup _).ext ((Finset.nodup _).map_on _)]
· intro a
simp only [Multiset.mem_filter, id, Multiset.mem_map, Finset.filter_val, ← Finset.mem_def,
mem_divisors]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨an, h0⟩, hsq⟩
use (UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors a).toFinset
simp only [id, Finset.mem_powerset]
rcases an with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at h0
rw [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors h0.1] at hsq
rw [Multiset.toFinset_subset, Multiset.toFinset_val, hsq.dedup, ← associated_iff_eq,
normalizedFactors_mul h0.1 h0.2]
exact ⟨Multiset.subset_of_le (Multiset.le_add_right _ _), prod_normalizedFactors h0.1⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
rw [Finset.mem_powerset, ← Finset.val_le_iff, Multiset.toFinset_val] at hs
have hs0 : s.val.prod ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff]
intro con
apply
not_irreducible_zero
(irreducible_of_normalized_factor 0 (Multiset.mem_dedup.1 (Multiset.mem_of_le hs con)))
rw [(prod_normalizedFactors h0).symm.dvd_iff_dvd_right]
refine ⟨⟨Multiset.prod_dvd_prod_of_le (le_trans hs (Multiset.dedup_le _)), h0⟩, ?_⟩
have h :=
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.factors_unique irreducible_of_normalized_factor
(fun x hx =>
irreducible_of_normalized_factor x
(Multiset.mem_of_le (le_trans hs (Multiset.dedup_le _)) hx))
(prod_normalizedFactors hs0)
rw [associated_eq_eq, Multiset.rel_eq] at h
rw [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors hs0, h]
apply s.nodup
· intro x hx y hy h
rw [← Finset.val_inj, ← Multiset.rel_eq, ← associated_eq_eq]
rw [← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_powerset] at hx hy
apply UniqueFactorizationMonoid.factors_unique _ _ (associated_iff_eq.2 h)
· intro z hz
apply irreducible_of_normalized_factor z
· rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset]
apply hx hz
· intro z hz
apply irreducible_of_normalized_factor z
· rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset]
apply hy hz
theorem sum_divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α]
{f : ℕ → α} :
∑ d ∈ n.divisors with Squarefree d, f d =
∑ i ∈ (UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors n).toFinset.powerset, f i.val.prod := by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, divisors_filter_squarefree h0, Multiset.map_map,
Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
rfl
theorem sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
∃ a b : ℕ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ b ^ 2 * a = n ∧ Squarefree a := by
classical
set S := {s ∈ range (n + 1) | s ∣ n ∧ ∃ x, s = x ^ 2}
have hSne : S.Nonempty := by
use 1
have h1 : 0 < n ∧ ∃ x : ℕ, 1 = x ^ 2 := ⟨hn, ⟨1, (one_pow 2).symm⟩⟩
simp [S, h1]
let s := Finset.max' S hSne
have hs : s ∈ S := Finset.max'_mem S hSne
simp only [S, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] at hs
obtain ⟨-, ⟨a, hsa⟩, ⟨b, hsb⟩⟩ := hs
rw [hsa] at hn
obtain ⟨hlts, hlta⟩ := CanonicallyOrderedAdd.mul_pos.mp hn
rw [hsb] at hsa hn hlts
refine ⟨a, b, hlta, (pow_pos_iff two_ne_zero).mp hlts, hsa.symm, ?_⟩
rintro x ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff]
by_contra hx
refine Nat.lt_le_asymm ?_ (Finset.le_max' S ((b * x) ^ 2) ?_)
· convert lt_mul_of_one_lt_right hlts
(one_lt_pow two_ne_zero (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨fun h => by simp_all, hx⟩))
using 1
rw [mul_pow]
· simp_rw [S, hsa, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range]
refine ⟨Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (le_of_dvd hn ?_), ?_, ⟨b * x, rfl⟩⟩ <;> use y <;> rw [hy] <;> ring
|
theorem sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos' {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) :
∃ a b : ℕ, (b + 1) ^ 2 * (a + 1) = n ∧ Squarefree (a + 1) := by
obtain ⟨a₁, b₁, ha₁, hb₁, hab₁, hab₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos h
refine ⟨a₁.pred, b₁.pred, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simpa only [add_one, succ_pred_eq_of_pos, ha₁, hb₁]
theorem sq_mul_squarefree (n : ℕ) : ∃ a b : ℕ, b ^ 2 * a = n ∧ Squarefree a := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact ⟨1, 0, by simp, squarefree_one⟩
· obtain ⟨a, b, -, -, h₁, h₂⟩ := sq_mul_squarefree_of_pos (succ_pos n)
exact ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩
/-- `Squarefree` is multiplicative. Note that the → direction does not require `hmn`
and generalizes to arbitrary commutative monoids. See `Squarefree.of_mul_left` and
`Squarefree.of_mul_right` above for auxiliary lemmas. -/
theorem squarefree_mul {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m.Coprime n) :
Squarefree (m * n) ↔ Squarefree m ∧ Squarefree n := by
simp only [squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree, ← sq, ← forall_and]
refine forall₂_congr fun p hp => ?_
simp only [hmn.isPrimePow_dvd_mul (hp.isPrimePow.pow two_ne_zero), not_or]
theorem coprime_of_squarefree_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Squarefree (m * n)) : m.Coprime n :=
coprime_of_dvd fun p hp hm hn => squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree.mp h p hp (mul_dvd_mul hm hn)
theorem squarefree_mul_iff {m n : ℕ} :
Squarefree (m * n) ↔ m.Coprime n ∧ Squarefree m ∧ Squarefree n :=
⟨fun h => ⟨coprime_of_squarefree_mul h, (squarefree_mul <| coprime_of_squarefree_mul h).mp h⟩,
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Squarefree.lean | 328 | 354 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_closedBall (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
namespace Behrend
variable {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem card_box : #(box n d) = d ^ n := by simp [box]
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) := {x ∈ box n d | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k}
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by simp [sphere]
theorem sphere_subset_box : sphere n d k ⊆ box n d :=
filter_subset _ _
theorem norm_of_mem_sphere {x : Fin n → ℕ} (hx : x ∈ sphere n d k) :
‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)‖ = √↑k := by
rw [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq]
dsimp
simp_rw [abs_cast, ← cast_pow, ← cast_sum, (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
theorem sphere_subset_preimage_metric_sphere : (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) ⊆
(fun x : Fin n → ℕ => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)) ⁻¹'
Metric.sphere (0 : PiLp 2 fun _ : Fin n => ℝ) (√↑k) :=
fun x hx => by rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_of_mem_sphere hx]
/-- The map that appears in Behrend's bound on Roth numbers. -/
@[simps]
def map (d : ℕ) : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ ℕ where
toFun a := ∑ i, a i * d ^ (i : ℕ)
map_zero' := by simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero]
map_add' a b := by simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, add_mul, sum_add_distrib]
theorem map_zero (d : ℕ) (a : Fin 0 → ℕ) : map d a = 0 := by simp [map]
theorem map_succ (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) :
map d a = a 0 + (∑ x : Fin n, a x.succ * d ^ (x : ℕ)) * d := by
simp [map, Fin.sum_univ_succ, _root_.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ← sum_mul]
theorem map_succ' (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) : map d a = a 0 + map d (a ∘ Fin.succ) * d :=
map_succ _
theorem map_monotone (d : ℕ) : Monotone (map d : (Fin n → ℕ) → ℕ) := fun x y h => by
dsimp; exact sum_le_sum fun i _ => Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ <| h i
theorem map_mod (a : Fin n.succ → ℕ) : map d a % d = a 0 % d := by
rw [map_succ, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right]
theorem map_eq_iff {x₁ x₂ : Fin n.succ → ℕ} (hx₁ : ∀ i, x₁ i < d) (hx₂ : ∀ i, x₂ i < d) :
map d x₁ = map d x₂ ↔ x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 ∧ map d (x₁ ∘ Fin.succ) = map d (x₂ ∘ Fin.succ) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [map_succ', map_succ', h.1, h.2]⟩
have : x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 := by
rw [← mod_eq_of_lt (hx₁ _), ← map_mod, ← mod_eq_of_lt (hx₂ _), ← map_mod, h]
rw [map_succ, map_succ, this, add_right_inj, mul_eq_mul_right_iff] at h
exact ⟨this, h.resolve_right (pos_of_gt (hx₁ 0)).ne'⟩
theorem map_injOn : {x : Fin n → ℕ | ∀ i, x i < d}.InjOn (map d) := by
intro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ h
induction n with
| zero => simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| succ n ih =>
ext i
have x := (map_eq_iff hx₁ hx₂).1 h
exact Fin.cases x.1 (congr_fun <| ih (fun _ => hx₁ _) (fun _ => hx₂ _) x.2) i
theorem map_le_of_mem_box (hx : x ∈ box n d) :
map (2 * d - 1) x ≤ ∑ i : Fin n, (d - 1) * (2 * d - 1) ^ (i : ℕ) :=
map_monotone (2 * d - 1) fun _ => Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| mem_box.1 hx _
nonrec theorem threeAPFree_sphere : ThreeAPFree (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) := by
set f : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) :=
{ toFun := fun f => ((↑) : ℕ → ℝ) ∘ f
map_zero' := funext fun _ => cast_zero
map_add' := fun _ _ => funext fun _ => cast_add _ _ }
refine ThreeAPFree.of_image (AddMonoidHomClass.isAddFreimanHom f (Set.mapsTo_image _ _))
cast_injective.comp_left.injOn (Set.subset_univ _) ?_
refine (threeAPFree_sphere 0 (√↑k)).mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun x => ?_)
rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm]
exact norm_of_mem_sphere
theorem threeAPFree_image_sphere :
ThreeAPFree ((sphere n d k).image (map (2 * d - 1)) : Set ℕ) := by
rw [coe_image]
apply ThreeAPFree.image' (α := Fin n → ℕ) (β := ℕ) (s := sphere n d k) (map (2 * d - 1))
(map_injOn.mono _) threeAPFree_sphere
rw [Set.add_subset_iff]
rintro a ha b hb i
have hai := mem_box.1 (sphere_subset_box ha) i
have hbi := mem_box.1 (sphere_subset_box hb) i
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, ← succ_le_iff, two_mul]
exact (add_add_add_comm _ _ 1 1).trans_le (_root_.add_le_add hai hbi)
theorem sum_sq_le_of_mem_box (hx : x ∈ box n d) : ∑ i : Fin n, x i ^ 2 ≤ n * (d - 1) ^ 2 := by
rw [mem_box] at hx
have : ∀ i, x i ^ 2 ≤ (d - 1) ^ 2 := fun i =>
Nat.pow_le_pow_left (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (hx i)) _
exact (sum_le_card_nsmul univ _ _ fun i _ => this i).trans (by rw [card_fin, smul_eq_mul])
theorem sum_eq : (∑ i : Fin n, d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ)) = ((2 * d + 1) ^ n - 1) / 2 := by
refine (Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left zero_lt_two ?_).symm
rw [← sum_range fun i => d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ), ← mul_sum, mul_right_comm, mul_comm d, ←
geom_sum_mul_add, add_tsub_cancel_right, mul_comm]
theorem sum_lt : (∑ i : Fin n, d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ)) < (2 * d + 1) ^ n :=
sum_eq.trans_lt <| (Nat.div_le_self _ 2).trans_lt <| pred_lt (pow_pos (succ_pos _) _).ne'
theorem card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat (n d k : ℕ) :
#(sphere n d k) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) := by
cases n
· dsimp; refine (card_le_univ _).trans_eq ?_; rfl
cases d
· simp
apply threeAPFree_image_sphere.le_rothNumberNat _ _ (card_image_of_injOn _)
· simp only [subset_iff, mem_image, and_imp, forall_exists_index, mem_range,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, sphere, mem_filter]
rintro _ x hx _ rfl
exact (map_le_of_mem_box hx).trans_lt sum_lt
apply map_injOn.mono fun x => ?_
simp only [mem_coe, sphere, mem_filter, mem_box, and_imp, two_mul]
exact fun h _ i => (h i).trans_le le_self_add
/-!
### Optimization
Now that we know how to turn the integer points of any sphere into a 3AP-free set, we find a
sphere containing many integer points by the pigeonhole principle. This gives us an implicit bound
that we then optimize by tweaking the parameters. The (almost) optimal parameters are
`Behrend.nValue` and `Behrend.dValue`.
-/
theorem exists_large_sphere_aux (n d : ℕ) : ∃ k ∈ range (n * (d - 1) ^ 2 + 1),
(↑(d ^ n) / ((n * (d - 1) ^ 2 :) + 1) : ℝ) ≤ #(sphere n d k) := by
refine exists_le_card_fiber_of_nsmul_le_card_of_maps_to (fun x hx => ?_) nonempty_range_succ ?_
· rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact sum_sq_le_of_mem_box hx
· rw [card_range, _root_.nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div_assoc', cast_add_one, mul_div_cancel_left₀,
card_box]
exact (cast_add_one_pos _).ne'
theorem exists_large_sphere (n d : ℕ) :
∃ k, ((d ^ n :) / (n * d ^ 2 :) : ℝ) ≤ #(sphere n d k) := by
obtain ⟨k, -, hk⟩ := exists_large_sphere_aux n d
refine ⟨k, ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· simp
obtain rfl | hd := d.eq_zero_or_pos
· simp
refine (div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ?_ ?_ ?_).trans hk
· exact cast_nonneg _
· exact cast_add_one_pos _
simp only [← le_sub_iff_add_le', cast_mul, ← mul_sub, cast_pow, cast_sub hd, sub_sq, one_pow,
cast_one, mul_one, sub_add, sub_sub_self]
apply one_le_mul_of_one_le_of_one_le
· rwa [one_le_cast]
rw [_root_.le_sub_iff_add_le]
norm_num
exact one_le_cast.2 hd
theorem bound_aux' (n d : ℕ) : ((d ^ n :) / (n * d ^ 2 :) : ℝ) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_large_sphere n d
h.trans <| cast_le.2 <| card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat _ _ _
theorem bound_aux (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
(d ^ (n - 2 :) / n : ℝ) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) := by
convert bound_aux' n d using 1
rw [cast_mul, cast_pow, mul_comm, ← div_div, pow_sub₀ _ _ hn, ← div_eq_mul_inv, cast_pow]
rwa [cast_ne_zero]
open scoped Filter Topology
open Real
section NumericalBounds
theorem log_two_mul_two_le_sqrt_log_eight : log 2 * 2 ≤ √(log 8) := by
have : (8 : ℝ) = 2 ^ ((3 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by rw [rpow_natCast]; norm_num
rw [this, log_rpow zero_lt_two (3 : ℕ)]
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le
rw [mul_pow, sq (log 2), mul_assoc, mul_comm]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (log_nonneg one_le_two)
rw [← le_div_iff₀]
on_goal 1 => apply log_two_lt_d9.le.trans
all_goals norm_num1
theorem two_div_one_sub_two_div_e_le_eight : 2 / (1 - 2 / exp 1) ≤ 8 := by
rw [div_le_iff₀, mul_sub, mul_one, mul_div_assoc', le_sub_comm, div_le_iff₀ (exp_pos _)]
· linarith [exp_one_gt_d9]
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one] <;> exact exp_one_gt_d9.trans' (by norm_num)
theorem le_sqrt_log (hN : 4096 ≤ N) : log (2 / (1 - 2 / exp 1)) * (69 / 50) ≤ √(log ↑N) := by
have : (12 : ℕ) * log 2 ≤ log N := by
rw [← log_rpow zero_lt_two, rpow_natCast]
exact log_le_log (by positivity) (mod_cast hN)
refine (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (log_le_log ?_ two_div_one_sub_two_div_e_le_eight) <| by
norm_num1).trans ?_
· refine div_pos zero_lt_two ?_
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one (exp_pos _)]
exact exp_one_gt_d9.trans_le' (by norm_num1)
have l8 : log 8 = (3 : ℕ) * log 2 := by
rw [← log_rpow zero_lt_two, rpow_natCast]
norm_num
rw [l8]
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le (le_trans _ this)
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_pow, sq (log 2), ← mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (log_nonneg one_le_two)
rw [← le_div_iff₀']
· exact log_two_lt_d9.le.trans (by norm_num1)
exact sq_pos_of_ne_zero (by norm_num1)
theorem exp_neg_two_mul_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : exp (-2 * x) < exp (2 - ⌈x⌉₊) / ⌈x⌉₊ := by
have h₁ := ceil_lt_add_one hx.le
have h₂ : 1 - x ≤ 2 - ⌈x⌉₊ := by linarith
calc
_ ≤ exp (1 - x) / (x + 1) := ?_
_ ≤ exp (2 - ⌈x⌉₊) / (x + 1) := by gcongr
_ < _ := by gcongr
rw [le_div_iff₀ (add_pos hx zero_lt_one), ← le_div_iff₀' (exp_pos _), ← exp_sub, neg_mul,
sub_neg_eq_add, two_mul, sub_add_add_cancel, add_comm _ x]
exact le_trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one) (add_one_le_exp _)
theorem div_lt_floor {x : ℝ} (hx : 2 / (1 - 2 / exp 1) ≤ x) : x / exp 1 < (⌊x / 2⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
| apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (sub_one_lt_floor _)
have : 0 < 1 - 2 / exp 1 := by
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one (exp_pos _)]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (by norm_num) exp_one_gt_d9
rwa [le_sub_comm, div_eq_mul_one_div x, div_eq_mul_one_div x, ← mul_sub, div_sub', ←
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 323 | 327 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.PiTensorProduct
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
/-!
# Tensor product of `R`-algebras and rings
If `(Aᵢ)` is a family of `R`-algebras then the `R`-tensor product `⨂ᵢ Aᵢ` is an `R`-algebra as well
with structure map defined by `r ↦ r • 1`.
In particular if we take `R` to be `ℤ`, then this collapses into the tensor product of rings.
-/
open TensorProduct Function
variable {ι R' R : Type*} {A : ι → Type*}
namespace PiTensorProduct
noncomputable section AddCommMonoidWithOne
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoidWithOne (A i)] [∀ i, Module R (A i)]
instance instOne : One (⨂[R] i, A i) where
one := tprod R 1
lemma one_def : 1 = tprod R (1 : Π i, A i) := rfl
instance instAddCommMonoidWithOne : AddCommMonoidWithOne (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, A i))
__ := instOne
end AddCommMonoidWithOne
noncomputable section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (A i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (A i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass R (A i) (A i)] [∀ i, IsScalarTower R (A i) (A i)]
attribute [aesop safe] mul_add mul_smul_comm smul_mul_assoc add_mul in
/--
The multiplication in tensor product of rings is induced by `(xᵢ) * (yᵢ) = (xᵢ * yᵢ)`
-/
def mul : (⨂[R] i, A i) →ₗ[R] (⨂[R] i, A i) →ₗ[R] (⨂[R] i, A i) :=
PiTensorProduct.piTensorHomMap₂ <| tprod R fun _ ↦ LinearMap.mul _ _
@[simp] lemma mul_tprod_tprod (x y : (i : ι) → A i) :
mul (tprod R x) (tprod R y) = tprod R (x * y) := by
simp only [mul, piTensorHomMap₂_tprod_tprod_tprod, LinearMap.mul_apply', Pi.mul_def]
instance instMul : Mul (⨂[R] i, A i) where
mul x y := mul x y
lemma mul_def (x y : ⨂[R] i, A i) : x * y = mul x y := rfl
@[simp] lemma tprod_mul_tprod (x y : (i : ι) → A i) :
tprod R x * tprod R y = tprod R (x * y) :=
mul_tprod_tprod x y
theorem _root_.SemiconjBy.tprod {a₁ a₂ a₃ : Π i, A i}
(ha : SemiconjBy a₁ a₂ a₃) :
SemiconjBy (tprod R a₁) (tprod R a₂) (tprod R a₃) := by
rw [SemiconjBy, tprod_mul_tprod, tprod_mul_tprod, ha]
nonrec theorem _root_.Commute.tprod {a₁ a₂ : Π i, A i} (ha : Commute a₁ a₂) :
Commute (tprod R a₁) (tprod R a₂) :=
ha.tprod
lemma smul_tprod_mul_smul_tprod (r s : R) (x y : Π i, A i) :
(r • tprod R x) * (s • tprod R y) = (r * s) • tprod R (x * y) := by
simp only [mul_def, map_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply, mul_tprod_tprod, mul_comm r s, mul_smul]
instance instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := instMul
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, A i))
left_distrib _ _ _ := (mul _).map_add _ _
right_distrib _ _ _ := mul.map_add₂ _ _ _
zero_mul _ := mul.map_zero₂ _
mul_zero _ := map_zero (mul _)
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
noncomputable section NonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, NonAssocSemiring (A i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (A i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass R (A i) (A i)] [∀ i, IsScalarTower R (A i) (A i)]
protected lemma one_mul (x : ⨂[R] i, A i) : mul (tprod R 1) x = x := by
induction x using PiTensorProduct.induction_on with
| smul_tprod => simp
| add _ _ h1 h2 => simp [map_add, h1, h2]
protected lemma mul_one (x : ⨂[R] i, A i) : mul x (tprod R 1) = x := by
induction x using PiTensorProduct.induction_on with
| smul_tprod => simp
| add _ _ h1 h2 => simp [h1, h2]
instance instNonAssocSemiring : NonAssocSemiring (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
one_mul := PiTensorProduct.one_mul
mul_one := PiTensorProduct.mul_one
variable (R) in
/-- `PiTensorProduct.tprod` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def tprodMonoidHom : (Π i, A i) →* ⨂[R] i, A i where
toFun := tprod R
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' x y := (tprod_mul_tprod x y).symm
end NonAssocSemiring
noncomputable section NonUnitalSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, NonUnitalSemiring (A i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (A i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass R (A i) (A i)] [∀ i, IsScalarTower R (A i) (A i)]
protected lemma mul_assoc (x y z : ⨂[R] i, A i) : mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z) := by
-- restate as an equality of morphisms so that we can use `ext`
suffices LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul ∘ₗ mul =
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ LinearMap.lflip <| LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ mul.flip ∘ₗ mul).flip by
exact DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun this x) y) z
ext x y z
dsimp [← mul_def]
simpa only [tprod_mul_tprod] using congr_arg (tprod R) (mul_assoc x y z)
instance instNonUnitalSemiring : NonUnitalSemiring (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
mul_assoc := PiTensorProduct.mul_assoc
end NonUnitalSemiring
noncomputable section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R'] [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, Semiring (A i)]
variable [Algebra R' R] [∀ i, Algebra R (A i)] [∀ i, Algebra R' (A i)]
variable [∀ i, IsScalarTower R' R (A i)]
instance instSemiring : Semiring (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := instNonUnitalSemiring
__ := instNonAssocSemiring
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R' (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := hasSMul'
algebraMap :=
{ toFun := (· • 1)
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' r s := show (r * s) • 1 = mul (r • 1) (s • 1) by
rw [LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.smul_apply, mul_comm,
mul_smul]
congr
show (1 : ⨂[R] i, A i) = 1 * 1
rw [mul_one]
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' := by simp [add_smul] }
commutes' r x := by
simp only [RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk]
change mul _ _ = mul _ _
rw [LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.smul_apply]
change r • (1 * x) = r • (x * 1)
rw [mul_one, one_mul]
smul_def' r x := by
simp only [RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk]
change _ = mul _ _
rw [LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.smul_apply]
change _ = r • (1 * x)
rw [one_mul]
lemma algebraMap_apply (r : R') (i : ι) [DecidableEq ι] :
algebraMap R' (⨂[R] i, A i) r = tprod R (Pi.mulSingle i (algebraMap R' (A i) r)) := by
change r • tprod R 1 = _
have : Pi.mulSingle i (algebraMap R' (A i) r) = update (fun i ↦ 1) i (r • 1) := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]; rfl
rw [this, ← smul_one_smul R r (1 : A i), MultilinearMap.map_update_smul, update_eq_self,
smul_one_smul, Pi.one_def]
/--
The map `Aᵢ ⟶ ⨂ᵢ Aᵢ` given by `a ↦ 1 ⊗ ... ⊗ a ⊗ 1 ⊗ ...`
-/
@[simps]
def singleAlgHom [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : A i →ₐ[R] ⨂[R] i, A i where
toFun a := tprod R (MonoidHom.mulSingle _ i a)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one]; rfl
map_mul' a a' := by simp [map_mul]
map_zero' := MultilinearMap.map_update_zero _ _ _
map_add' _ _ := MultilinearMap.map_update_add _ _ _ _ _
commutes' r := show tprodCoeff R _ _ = r • tprodCoeff R _ _ by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, ← Pi.one_apply, MonoidHom.mulSingle_apply, Pi.mulSingle,
smul_tprodCoeff]
rfl
/--
Lifting a multilinear map to an algebra homomorphism from tensor product
-/
@[simps!]
def liftAlgHom {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : MultilinearMap R A S)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) : (⨂[R] i, A i) →ₐ[R] S :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (lift f) (show lift f (tprod R 1) = 1 by simp [one]) <|
LinearMap.map_mul_iff _ |>.mpr <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma tprod_noncommProd {κ : Type*} (s : Finset κ) (x : κ → Π i, A i) (hx) :
tprod R (s.noncommProd x hx) = s.noncommProd (fun k => tprod R (x k))
(hx.imp fun _ _ => Commute.tprod) :=
Finset.map_noncommProd s x _ (tprodMonoidHom R)
/-- To show two algebra morphisms from finite tensor products are equal, it suffices to show that
they agree on elements of the form $1 ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ a ⊗ 1 ⊗ ⋯$. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext {S : Type*} [Finite ι] [DecidableEq ι] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
⦃f g : (⨂[R] i, A i) →ₐ[R] S⦄ (h : ∀ i, f.comp (singleAlgHom i) = g.comp (singleAlgHom i)) :
f = g :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| PiTensorProduct.ext <| MultilinearMap.ext fun x =>
suffices f.toMonoidHom.comp (tprodMonoidHom R) = g.toMonoidHom.comp (tprodMonoidHom R) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this x
MonoidHom.pi_ext fun i xi => DFunLike.congr_fun (h i) xi
end Semiring
noncomputable section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [∀ i, Ring (A i)] [∀ i, Algebra R (A i)]
instance instRing : Ring (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := instSemiring
__ := inferInstanceAs <| AddCommGroup (⨂[R] i, A i)
end Ring
noncomputable section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, CommSemiring (A i)] [∀ i, Algebra R (A i)]
protected lemma mul_comm (x y : ⨂[R] i, A i) : mul x y = mul y x := by
suffices mul (R := R) (A := A) = mul.flip from
DFunLike.congr_fun (DFunLike.congr_fun this x) y
ext x y
dsimp
simp only [mul_tprod_tprod, mul_tprod_tprod, mul_comm x y]
instance instCommSemiring : CommSemiring (⨂[R] i, A i) where
__ := instSemiring
__ := inferInstanceAs <| AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, A i)
mul_comm := PiTensorProduct.mul_comm
@[simp] lemma tprod_prod {κ : Type*} (s : Finset κ) (x : κ → Π i, A i) :
tprod R (∏ k ∈ s, x k) = ∏ k ∈ s, tprod R (x k) :=
map_prod (tprodMonoidHom R) x s
section
open Function
variable [Fintype ι]
variable (R ι)
/--
The algebra equivalence from the tensor product of the constant family with
value `R` to `R`, given by multiplication of the entries.
-/
noncomputable def constantBaseRingEquiv : (⨂[R] _ : ι, R) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
letI toFun := lift (MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R)
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom
(AlgHom.ofLinearMap
toFun
((lift.tprod _).trans Finset.prod_const_one)
(by
-- one of these is required, the other is a performance optimization
letI : IsScalarTower R (⨂[R] x : ι, R) (⨂[R] x : ι, R) :=
IsScalarTower.right (R := R) (A := ⨂[R] (x : ι), R)
letI : SMulCommClass R (⨂[R] x : ι, R) (⨂[R] x : ι, R) :=
Algebra.to_smulCommClass (R := R) (A := ⨂[R] x : ι, R)
rw [LinearMap.map_mul_iff]
ext x y
show toFun (tprod R x * tprod R y) = toFun (tprod R x) * toFun (tprod R y)
simp_rw [tprod_mul_tprod, toFun, lift.tprod, MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra_apply,
Pi.mul_apply, Finset.prod_mul_distrib]))
(Algebra.ofId _ _)
(by ext)
(by classical ext)
| variable {R ι}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PiTensorProduct.lean | 290 | 292 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
/-!
# Union lift
This file defines `Set.iUnionLift` to glue together functions defined on each of a collection of
sets to make a function on the Union of those sets.
## Main definitions
* `Set.iUnionLift` - Given a Union of sets `iUnion S`, define a function on any subset of the Union
by defining it on each component, and proving that it agrees on the intersections.
* `Set.liftCover` - Version of `Set.iUnionLift` for the special case that the sets cover the
entire type.
## Main statements
There are proofs of the obvious properties of `iUnionLift`, i.e. what it does to elements of
each of the sets in the `iUnion`, stated in different ways.
There are also three lemmas about `iUnionLift` intended to aid with proving that `iUnionLift` is a
homomorphism when defined on a Union of substructures. There is one lemma each to show that
constants, unary functions, or binary functions are preserved. These lemmas are:
*`Set.iUnionLift_const`
*`Set.iUnionLift_unary`
*`Set.iUnionLift_binary`
## Tags
directed union, directed supremum, glue, gluing
-/
variable {α : Type*} {ι β : Sort _}
namespace Set
section UnionLift
/- The unused argument is left in the definition so that the `simp` lemmas
`iUnionLift_inclusion` will work without the user having to provide it explicitly to
simplify terms involving `iUnionLift`. -/
/-- Given a union of sets `iUnion S`, define a function on the Union by defining
it on each component, and proving that it agrees on the intersections. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
noncomputable def iUnionLift (S : ι → Set α) (f : ∀ i, S i → β)
(_ : ∀ (i j) (x : α) (hxi : x ∈ S i) (hxj : x ∈ S j), f i ⟨x, hxi⟩ = f j ⟨x, hxj⟩) (T : Set α)
(hT : T ⊆ iUnion S) (x : T) : β :=
let i := Classical.indefiniteDescription _ (mem_iUnion.1 (hT x.prop))
f i ⟨x, i.prop⟩
variable {S : ι → Set α} {f : ∀ i, S i → β}
{hf : ∀ (i j) (x : α) (hxi : x ∈ S i) (hxj : x ∈ S j), f i ⟨x, hxi⟩ = f j ⟨x, hxj⟩} {T : Set α}
{hT : T ⊆ iUnion S} (hT' : T = iUnion S)
@[simp]
theorem iUnionLift_mk {i : ι} (x : S i) (hx : (x : α) ∈ T) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT ⟨x, hx⟩ = f i x := hf _ i x _ _
theorem iUnionLift_inclusion {i : ι} (x : S i) (h : S i ⊆ T) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT (Set.inclusion h x) = f i x :=
iUnionLift_mk x _
theorem iUnionLift_of_mem (x : T) {i : ι} (hx : (x : α) ∈ S i) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT x = f i ⟨x, hx⟩ := by obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x; exact hf _ _ _ _ _
theorem preimage_iUnionLift (t : Set β) :
iUnionLift S f hf T hT ⁻¹' t =
inclusion hT ⁻¹' (⋃ i, inclusion (subset_iUnion S i) '' (f i ⁻¹' t)) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_image]
constructor
· rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hT x.prop) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine fun h => ⟨i, ⟨x, hi⟩, ?_, rfl⟩
rwa [iUnionLift_of_mem x hi] at h
· rintro ⟨i, ⟨y, hi⟩, h, hxy⟩
obtain rfl : y = x := congr_arg Subtype.val hxy
rwa [iUnionLift_of_mem x hi]
/-- `iUnionLift_const` is useful for proving that `iUnionLift` is a homomorphism
of algebraic structures when defined on the Union of algebraic subobjects.
For example, it could be used to prove that the lift of a collection
of group homomorphisms on a union of subgroups preserves `1`. -/
theorem iUnionLift_const (c : T) (ci : ∀ i, S i) (hci : ∀ i, (ci i : α) = c) (cβ : β)
(h : ∀ i, f i (ci i) = cβ) : iUnionLift S f hf T hT c = cβ := by
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 (hT c.prop)
have : ci i = ⟨c, hi⟩ := Subtype.ext (hci i)
rw [iUnionLift_of_mem _ hi, ← this, h]
/-- `iUnionLift_unary` is useful for proving that `iUnionLift` is a homomorphism
of algebraic structures when defined on the Union of algebraic subobjects.
For example, it could be used to prove that the lift of a collection
of linear_maps on a union of submodules preserves scalar multiplication. -/
theorem iUnionLift_unary (u : T → T) (ui : ∀ i, S i → S i)
(hui :
∀ (i) (x : S i),
u (Set.inclusion (show S i ⊆ T from hT'.symm ▸ Set.subset_iUnion S i) x) =
Set.inclusion (show S i ⊆ T from hT'.symm ▸ Set.subset_iUnion S i) (ui i x))
(uβ : β → β) (h : ∀ (i) (x : S i), f i (ui i x) = uβ (f i x)) (x : T) :
iUnionLift S f hf T (le_of_eq hT') (u x) = uβ (iUnionLift S f hf T (le_of_eq hT') x) := by
subst hT'
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 x.prop
rw [iUnionLift_of_mem x hi, ← h i]
have : x = Set.inclusion (Set.subset_iUnion S i) ⟨x, hi⟩ := by
cases x
rfl
conv_lhs => rw [this, hui, iUnionLift_inclusion]
/-- `iUnionLift_binary` is useful for proving that `iUnionLift` is a homomorphism
of algebraic structures when defined on the Union of algebraic subobjects.
For example, it could be used to prove that the lift of a collection
of group homomorphisms on a union of subgroups preserves `*`. -/
theorem iUnionLift_binary (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) (op : T → T → T) (opi : ∀ i, S i → S i → S i)
(hopi :
∀ i x y,
Set.inclusion (show S i ⊆ T from hT'.symm ▸ Set.subset_iUnion S i) (opi i x y) =
op (Set.inclusion (show S i ⊆ T from hT'.symm ▸ Set.subset_iUnion S i) x)
(Set.inclusion (show S i ⊆ T from hT'.symm ▸ Set.subset_iUnion S i) y))
(opβ : β → β → β) (h : ∀ (i) (x y : S i), f i (opi i x y) = opβ (f i x) (f i y)) (x y : T) :
iUnionLift S f hf T (le_of_eq hT') (op x y) =
opβ (iUnionLift S f hf T (le_of_eq hT') x) (iUnionLift S f hf T (le_of_eq hT') y) := by
| subst hT'
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 x.prop
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.1 y.prop
rcases dir i j with ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩
rw [iUnionLift_of_mem x (hik hi), iUnionLift_of_mem y (hjk hj), ← h k]
have hx : x = Set.inclusion (Set.subset_iUnion S k) ⟨x, hik hi⟩ := by
cases x
rfl
have hy : y = Set.inclusion (Set.subset_iUnion S k) ⟨y, hjk hj⟩ := by
cases y
rfl
have hxy : (Set.inclusion (Set.subset_iUnion S k) (opi k ⟨x, hik hi⟩ ⟨y, hjk hj⟩) : α) ∈ S k :=
(opi k ⟨x, hik hi⟩ ⟨y, hjk hj⟩).prop
conv_lhs => rw [hx, hy, ← hopi, iUnionLift_of_mem _ hxy]
end UnionLift
variable {S : ι → Set α} {f : ∀ i, S i → β}
{hf : ∀ (i j) (x : α) (hxi : x ∈ S i) (hxj : x ∈ S j), f i ⟨x, hxi⟩ = f j ⟨x, hxj⟩}
{hS : iUnion S = univ}
/-- Glue together functions defined on each of a collection `S` of sets that cover a type. See
also `Set.iUnionLift`. -/
noncomputable def liftCover (S : ι → Set α) (f : ∀ i, S i → β)
| Mathlib/Data/Set/UnionLift.lean | 127 | 150 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.AkraBazzi.GrowsPolynomially
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
/-!
# Divide-and-conquer recurrences and the Akra-Bazzi theorem
A divide-and-conquer recurrence is a function `T : ℕ → ℝ` that satisfies a recurrence relation of
the form `T(n) = ∑_{i=0}^{k-1} a_i T(r_i(n)) + g(n)` for large enough `n`, where `r_i(n)` is some
function where `‖r_i(n) - b_i n‖ ∈ o(n / (log n)^2)` for every `i`, the `a_i`'s are some positive
coefficients, and the `b_i`'s are reals `∈ (0,1)`. (Note that this can be improved to
`O(n / (log n)^(1+ε))`, this is left as future work.) These recurrences arise mainly in the
analysis of divide-and-conquer algorithms such as mergesort or Strassen's algorithm for matrix
multiplication. This class of algorithms works by dividing an instance of the problem of size `n`,
into `k` smaller instances, where the `i`'th instance is of size roughly `b_i n`, and calling itself
recursively on those smaller instances. `T(n)` then represents the running time of the algorithm,
and `g(n)` represents the running time required to actually divide up the instance and process the
answers that come out of the recursive calls. Since virtually all such algorithms produce instances
that are only approximately of size `b_i n` (they have to round up or down at the very least), we
allow the instance sizes to be given by some function `r_i(n)` that approximates `b_i n`.
The Akra-Bazzi theorem gives the asymptotic order of such a recurrence: it states that
`T(n) ∈ Θ(n^p (1 + ∑_{u=0}^{n-1} g(n) / u^{p+1}))`,
where `p` is the unique real number such that `∑ a_i b_i^p = 1`.
## Main definitions and results
* `AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r`: the predicate stating that `T : ℕ → ℝ` satisfies an Akra-Bazzi
recurrence with parameters `g`, `a`, `b` and `r` as above.
* `GrowsPolynomially`: The growth condition that `g` must satisfy for the theorem to apply.
It roughly states that
`c₁ g(n) ≤ g(u) ≤ c₂ g(n)`, for u between b*n and n for any constant `b ∈ (0,1)`.
* `sumTransform`: The transformation which turns a function `g` into
`n^p * ∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico n₀ n, g u / u^(p+1)`.
* `asympBound`: The asymptotic bound satisfied by an Akra-Bazzi recurrence, namely
`n^p (1 + ∑ g(u) / u^(p+1))`
* `isTheta_asympBound`: The main result stating that
`T(n) ∈ Θ(n^p (1 + ∑_{u=0}^{n-1} g(n) / u^{p+1}))`
## Implementation
Note that the original version of the theorem has an integral rather than a sum in the above
expression, and first considers the `T : ℝ → ℝ` case before moving on to `ℕ → ℝ`. We prove the
above version with a sum, as it is simpler and more relevant for algorithms.
## TODO
* Specialize this theorem to the very common case where the recurrence is of the form
`T(n) = ℓT(r_i(n)) + g(n)`
where `g(n) ∈ Θ(n^t)` for some `t`. (This is often called the "master theorem" in the literature.)
* Add the original version of the theorem with an integral instead of a sum.
## References
* Mohamad Akra and Louay Bazzi, On the solution of linear recurrence equations
* Tom Leighton, Notes on better master theorems for divide-and-conquer recurrences
* Manuel Eberl, Asymptotic reasoning in a proof assistant
-/
open Finset Real Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Topology
/-!
#### Definition of Akra-Bazzi recurrences
This section defines the predicate `AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r` which states that `T`
satisfies the recurrence
`T(n) = ∑_{i=0}^{k-1} a_i T(r_i(n)) + g(n)`
with appropriate conditions on the various parameters.
-/
/-- An Akra-Bazzi recurrence is a function that satisfies the recurrence
`T n = (∑ i, a i * T (r i n)) + g n`. -/
structure AkraBazziRecurrence {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [Nonempty α]
(T : ℕ → ℝ) (g : ℝ → ℝ) (a : α → ℝ) (b : α → ℝ) (r : α → ℕ → ℕ) where
/-- Point below which the recurrence is in the base case -/
n₀ : ℕ
/-- `n₀` is always `> 0` -/
n₀_gt_zero : 0 < n₀
/-- The `a`'s are nonzero -/
a_pos : ∀ i, 0 < a i
/-- The `b`'s are nonzero -/
b_pos : ∀ i, 0 < b i
/-- The b's are less than 1 -/
b_lt_one : ∀ i, b i < 1
/-- `g` is nonnegative -/
g_nonneg : ∀ x ≥ 0, 0 ≤ g x
/-- `g` grows polynomially -/
g_grows_poly : AkraBazziRecurrence.GrowsPolynomially g
/-- The actual recurrence -/
h_rec (n : ℕ) (hn₀ : n₀ ≤ n) : T n = (∑ i, a i * T (r i n)) + g n
/-- Base case: `T(n) > 0` whenever `n < n₀` -/
T_gt_zero' (n : ℕ) (hn : n < n₀) : 0 < T n
/-- The `r`'s always reduce `n` -/
r_lt_n : ∀ i n, n₀ ≤ n → r i n < n
/-- The `r`'s approximate the `b`'s -/
dist_r_b : ∀ i, (fun n => (r i n : ℝ) - b i * n) =o[atTop] fun n => n / (log n) ^ 2
namespace AkraBazziRecurrence
section min_max
variable {α : Type*} [Finite α] [Nonempty α]
/-- Smallest `b i` -/
noncomputable def min_bi (b : α → ℝ) : α :=
Classical.choose <| Finite.exists_min b
/-- Largest `b i` -/
noncomputable def max_bi (b : α → ℝ) : α :=
Classical.choose <| Finite.exists_max b
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma min_bi_le {b : α → ℝ} (i : α) : b (min_bi b) ≤ b i :=
Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_min b) i
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma max_bi_le {b : α → ℝ} (i : α) : b i ≤ b (max_bi b) :=
Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_max b) i
end min_max
lemma isLittleO_self_div_log_id :
(fun (n : ℕ) => n / log n ^ 2) =o[atTop] (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ)) := by
calc (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) / log n ^ 2) = fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) * ((log n) ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
_ =o[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) * 1⁻¹ := by
refine IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _) ?_
refine IsLittleO.inv_rev ?main ?zero
case zero => simp
case main => calc
_ = (fun (_ : ℕ) => ((1 : ℝ) ^ 2)) := by simp
_ =o[atTop] (fun (n : ℕ) => (log n)^2) :=
IsLittleO.pow (IsLittleO.natCast_atTop
<| isLittleO_const_log_atTop) (by norm_num)
_ = (fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ)) := by ext; simp
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] {T : ℕ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : α → ℝ} {r : α → ℕ → ℕ}
variable [Nonempty α] (R : AkraBazziRecurrence T g a b r)
section
include R
lemma dist_r_b' : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ∀ i, ‖(r i n : ℝ) - b i * n‖ ≤ n / log n ^ 2 := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
intro i
simpa using IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (R.dist_r_b i)
lemma eventually_b_le_r : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, (b i : ℝ) * n - (n / log n ^ 2) ≤ r i n := by
filter_upwards [R.dist_r_b'] with n hn
intro i
have h₁ : 0 ≤ b i := le_of_lt <| R.b_pos _
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add, add_comm, ← sub_le_iff_le_add]
calc (b i : ℝ) * n - r i n = ‖b i * n‖ - ‖(r i n : ℝ)‖ := by
simp only [norm_mul, RCLike.norm_natCast, sub_left_inj,
Nat.cast_eq_zero, Real.norm_of_nonneg h₁]
_ ≤ ‖(b i * n : ℝ) - r i n‖ := norm_sub_norm_le _ _
_ = ‖(r i n : ℝ) - b i * n‖ := norm_sub_rev _ _
_ ≤ n / log n ^ 2 := hn i
lemma eventually_r_le_b : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, r i n ≤ (b i : ℝ) * n + (n / log n ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [R.dist_r_b'] with n hn
intro i
calc r i n = b i * n + (r i n - b i * n) := by ring
_ ≤ b i * n + ‖r i n - b i * n‖ := by gcongr; exact Real.le_norm_self _
_ ≤ b i * n + n / log n ^ 2 := by gcongr; exact hn i
lemma eventually_r_lt_n : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, r i n < n := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop R.n₀] with n hn
exact fun i => R.r_lt_n i n hn
lemma eventually_bi_mul_le_r : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, (b (min_bi b) / 2) * n ≤ r i n := by
have gt_zero : 0 < b (min_bi b) := R.b_pos (min_bi b)
have hlo := isLittleO_self_div_log_id
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hlo
have hlo' := hlo (by positivity : 0 < b (min_bi b) / 2)
filter_upwards [hlo', R.eventually_b_le_r] with n hn hn'
intro i
simp only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ))] at hn
calc b (min_bi b) / 2 * n = b (min_bi b) * n - b (min_bi b) / 2 * n := by ring
_ ≤ b (min_bi b) * n - ‖n / log n ^ 2‖ := by gcongr
_ ≤ b i * n - ‖n / log n ^ 2‖ := by gcongr; aesop
_ = b i * n - n / log n ^ 2 := by
congr
exact Real.norm_of_nonneg <| by positivity
_ ≤ r i n := hn' i
lemma bi_min_div_two_lt_one : b (min_bi b) / 2 < 1 := by
have gt_zero : 0 < b (min_bi b) := R.b_pos (min_bi b)
calc b (min_bi b) / 2 < b (min_bi b) := by aesop (add safe apply div_two_lt_of_pos)
_ < 1 := R.b_lt_one _
lemma bi_min_div_two_pos : 0 < b (min_bi b) / 2 := div_pos (R.b_pos _) (by norm_num)
lemma exists_eventually_const_mul_le_r :
∃ c ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, c * n ≤ r i n := by
have gt_zero : 0 < b (min_bi b) := R.b_pos (min_bi b)
exact ⟨b (min_bi b) / 2, ⟨⟨by positivity, R.bi_min_div_two_lt_one⟩, R.eventually_bi_mul_le_r⟩⟩
lemma eventually_r_ge (C : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, C ≤ r i n := by
obtain ⟨c, hc_mem, hc⟩ := R.exists_eventually_const_mul_le_r
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop ⌈C / c⌉₊, hc] with n hn₁ hn₂
have h₁ := hc_mem.1
intro i
calc C = c * (C / c) := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc]
exact (mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (by positivity)).symm
_ ≤ c * ⌈C / c⌉₊ := by gcongr; simp [Nat.le_ceil]
_ ≤ c * n := by gcongr
_ ≤ r i n := hn₂ i
lemma tendsto_atTop_r (i : α) : Tendsto (r i) atTop atTop := by
rw [tendsto_atTop]
intro b
have := R.eventually_r_ge b
rw [Filter.eventually_all] at this
exact_mod_cast this i
lemma tendsto_atTop_r_real (i : α) : Tendsto (fun n => (r i n : ℝ)) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop (R.tendsto_atTop_r i)
lemma exists_eventually_r_le_const_mul :
∃ c ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, r i n ≤ c * n := by
let c := b (max_bi b) + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2
have h_max_bi_pos : 0 < b (max_bi b) := R.b_pos _
have h_max_bi_lt_one : 0 < 1 - b (max_bi b) := by
have : b (max_bi b) < 1 := R.b_lt_one _
linarith
have hc_pos : 0 < c := by positivity
have h₁ : 0 < (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2 := by positivity
have hc_lt_one : c < 1 :=
calc b (max_bi b) + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2 = b (max_bi b) * (1 / 2) + 1 / 2 := by ring
_ < 1 * (1 / 2) + 1 / 2 := by
gcongr
exact R.b_lt_one _
_ = 1 := by norm_num
refine ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc_lt_one⟩, ?_⟩
have hlo := isLittleO_self_div_log_id
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hlo
have hlo' := hlo h₁
filter_upwards [hlo', R.eventually_r_le_b] with n hn hn'
intro i
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)] at hn
simp only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ))] at hn
calc r i n ≤ b i * n + n / log n ^ 2 := by exact hn' i
_ ≤ b i * n + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2 * n := by gcongr
_ = (b i + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2) * n := by ring
_ ≤ (b (max_bi b) + (1 - b (max_bi b)) / 2) * n := by gcongr; exact max_bi_le _
lemma eventually_r_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < r i n := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
exact fun i => (R.tendsto_atTop_r i).eventually_gt_atTop 0
lemma eventually_log_b_mul_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < log (b i * n) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
intro i
have h : Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => log (b i * n)) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.comp tendsto_log_atTop
<| Tendsto.const_mul_atTop (b_pos R i) tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
exact h.eventually_gt_atTop 0
@[aesop safe apply] lemma T_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < T n := by
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind n h_ind =>
cases lt_or_le n R.n₀ with
| inl hn => exact R.T_gt_zero' n hn -- n < R.n₀
| inr hn => -- R.n₀ ≤ n
rw [R.h_rec n hn]
have := R.g_nonneg
refine add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (Finset.sum_pos ?sum_elems univ_nonempty) (by aesop)
exact fun i _ => mul_pos (R.a_pos i) <| h_ind _ (R.r_lt_n i _ hn)
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma T_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ T n := le_of_lt <| R.T_pos n
end
/-!
#### Smoothing function
We define `ε` as the "smoothing function" `fun n => 1 / log n`, which will be used in the form of a
factor of `1 ± ε n` needed to make the induction step go through.
This is its own definition to make it easier to switch to a different smoothing function.
For example, choosing `1 / log n ^ δ` for a suitable choice of `δ` leads to a slightly tighter
theorem at the price of a more complicated proof.
This part of the file then proves several properties of this function that will be needed later in
the proof.
-/
/-- The "smoothing function" is defined as `1 / log n`. This is defined as an `ℝ → ℝ` function
as opposed to `ℕ → ℝ` since this is more convenient for the proof, where we need to e.g. take
derivatives. -/
noncomputable def smoothingFn (n : ℝ) : ℝ := 1 / log n
local notation "ε" => smoothingFn
lemma one_add_smoothingFn_le_two {x : ℝ} (hx : exp 1 ≤ x) : 1 + ε x ≤ 2 := by
simp only [smoothingFn, ← one_add_one_eq_two]
gcongr
have : 1 < x := by
calc 1 = exp 0 := by simp
_ < exp 1 := by simp
_ ≤ x := hx
rw [div_le_one (log_pos this)]
calc 1 = log (exp 1) := by simp
_ ≤ log x := log_le_log (exp_pos _) hx
lemma isLittleO_smoothingFn_one : ε =o[atTop] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) := by
unfold smoothingFn
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun _ h => False.elim <| one_ne_zero h) ?_
simp only [one_div, div_one]
exact Tendsto.inv_tendsto_atTop Real.tendsto_log_atTop
lemma isEquivalent_one_add_smoothingFn_one : (fun x => 1 + ε x) ~[atTop] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :=
IsEquivalent.add_isLittleO IsEquivalent.refl isLittleO_smoothingFn_one
lemma isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one : (fun x => 1 - ε x) ~[atTop] (fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :=
IsEquivalent.sub_isLittleO IsEquivalent.refl isLittleO_smoothingFn_one
lemma growsPolynomially_one_sub_smoothingFn : GrowsPolynomially fun x => 1 - ε x :=
GrowsPolynomially.of_isEquivalent_const isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one
lemma growsPolynomially_one_add_smoothingFn : GrowsPolynomially fun x => 1 + ε x :=
GrowsPolynomially.of_isEquivalent_const isEquivalent_one_add_smoothingFn_one
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const_real (c : ℝ) (hc : c < 1) :
∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, c < 1 - ε x := by
have h₁ : Tendsto (fun x => 1 - ε x) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
rw [← isEquivalent_const_iff_tendsto one_ne_zero]
exact isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one
rw [tendsto_order] at h₁
exact h₁.1 c hc
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const (c : ℝ) (hc : c < 1) :
∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, c < 1 - ε n :=
Eventually.natCast_atTop (p := fun n => c < 1 - ε n)
<| eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const_real c hc
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos_real : ∀ᶠ (x : ℝ) in atTop, 0 < 1 - ε x :=
eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const_real 0 zero_lt_one
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 < 1 - ε n :=
(eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos_real).natCast_atTop
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_nonneg : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 ≤ 1 - ε n := by
filter_upwards [eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos] with n hn; exact le_of_lt hn
include R in
lemma eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_r_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < 1 - ε (r i n) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
exact fun i => (R.tendsto_atTop_r_real i).eventually eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos_real
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma differentiableAt_smoothingFn {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) : DifferentiableAt ℝ ε x := by
have : log x ≠ 0 := Real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one (by positivity) (ne_of_gt hx)
show DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun z => 1 / log z) x
simp_rw [one_div]
exact DifferentiableAt.inv (differentiableAt_log (by positivity)) this
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma differentiableAt_one_sub_smoothingFn {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun z => 1 - ε z) x :=
DifferentiableAt.sub (differentiableAt_const _) <| differentiableAt_smoothingFn hx
lemma differentiableOn_one_sub_smoothingFn : DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun z => 1 - ε z) (Set.Ioi 1) :=
fun _ hx => (differentiableAt_one_sub_smoothingFn hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[aesop safe apply]
lemma differentiableAt_one_add_smoothingFn {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun z => 1 + ε z) x :=
DifferentiableAt.add (differentiableAt_const _) <| differentiableAt_smoothingFn hx
lemma differentiableOn_one_add_smoothingFn : DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun z => 1 + ε z) (Set.Ioi 1) :=
fun _ hx => (differentiableAt_one_add_smoothingFn hx).differentiableWithinAt
lemma deriv_smoothingFn {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) : deriv ε x = -x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := by
have : log x ≠ 0 := Real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one (by positivity) (ne_of_gt hx)
show deriv (fun z => 1 / log z) x = -x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2)
rw [deriv_div] <;> aesop
lemma isLittleO_deriv_smoothingFn : deriv ε =o[atTop] fun x => x⁻¹ := calc
deriv ε =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => -x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx
rw [deriv_smoothingFn hx]
_ = fun x => (-x * log x ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [neg_div, div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv, neg_inv, neg_mul]
_ =o[atTop] fun x => (x * 1)⁻¹ := by
refine IsLittleO.inv_rev ?_ ?_
· refine IsBigO.mul_isLittleO
(by rw [isBigO_neg_right]; aesop (add safe isBigO_refl)) ?_
rw [isLittleO_one_left_iff]
exact Tendsto.comp tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop
<| Tendsto.comp (tendsto_pow_atTop (by norm_num)) tendsto_log_atTop
· exact Filter.Eventually.of_forall (fun x hx => by rw [mul_one] at hx; simp [hx])
_ = fun x => x⁻¹ := by simp
lemma eventually_deriv_one_sub_smoothingFn :
deriv (fun x => 1 - ε x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := calc
deriv (fun x => 1 - ε x) =ᶠ[atTop] -(deriv ε) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx; rw [deriv_sub] <;> aesop
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx
simp [deriv_smoothingFn hx, neg_div]
lemma eventually_deriv_one_add_smoothingFn :
deriv (fun x => 1 + ε x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => -x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := calc
deriv (fun x => 1 + ε x) =ᶠ[atTop] deriv ε := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx; rw [deriv_add] <;> aesop
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => -x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx
simp [deriv_smoothingFn hx]
lemma isLittleO_deriv_one_sub_smoothingFn :
deriv (fun x => 1 - ε x) =o[atTop] fun (x : ℝ) => x⁻¹ := calc
deriv (fun x => 1 - ε x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun z => -(deriv ε z) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx; rw [deriv_sub] <;> aesop
_ =o[atTop] fun x => x⁻¹ := by rw [isLittleO_neg_left]; exact isLittleO_deriv_smoothingFn
lemma isLittleO_deriv_one_add_smoothingFn :
deriv (fun x => 1 + ε x) =o[atTop] fun (x : ℝ) => x⁻¹ := calc
deriv (fun x => 1 + ε x) =ᶠ[atTop] fun z => deriv ε z := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx; rw [deriv_add] <;> aesop
_ =o[atTop] fun x => x⁻¹ := isLittleO_deriv_smoothingFn
lemma eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 < 1 + ε n := by
have h₁ := isLittleO_smoothingFn_one
rw [isLittleO_iff] at h₁
refine Eventually.natCast_atTop (p := fun n => 0 < 1 + ε n) ?_
filter_upwards [h₁ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1/2), eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x _ hx'
have : 0 < log x := Real.log_pos hx'
show 0 < 1 + 1 / log x
positivity
include R in
lemma eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_r_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < 1 + ε (r i n) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
exact fun i => (R.tendsto_atTop_r i).eventually (f := r i) eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_pos
lemma eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_nonneg : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 ≤ 1 + ε n := by
filter_upwards [eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_pos] with n hn; exact le_of_lt hn
lemma strictAntiOn_smoothingFn : StrictAntiOn ε (Set.Ioi 1) := by
show StrictAntiOn (fun x => 1 / log x) (Set.Ioi 1)
simp_rw [one_div]
refine StrictAntiOn.comp_strictMonoOn inv_strictAntiOn ?log fun _ hx => log_pos hx
refine StrictMonoOn.mono strictMonoOn_log (fun x hx => ?_)
exact Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi zero_le_one hx
lemma strictMonoOn_one_sub_smoothingFn :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => (1 : ℝ) - ε x) (Set.Ioi 1) := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact StrictMonoOn.const_add (StrictAntiOn.neg <| strictAntiOn_smoothingFn) 1
lemma strictAntiOn_one_add_smoothingFn : StrictAntiOn (fun (x : ℝ) => (1 : ℝ) + ε x) (Set.Ioi 1) :=
StrictAntiOn.const_add strictAntiOn_smoothingFn 1
section
include R
lemma isEquivalent_smoothingFn_sub_self (i : α) :
(fun (n : ℕ) => ε (b i * n) - ε n) ~[atTop] fun n => -log (b i) / (log n)^2 := by
calc (fun (n : ℕ) => 1 / log (b i * n) - 1 / log n)
=ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (log n - log (b i * n)) / (log (b i * n) * log n) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1, R.eventually_log_b_mul_pos] with n hn hn'
have h_log_pos : 0 < log n := Real.log_pos <| by aesop
simp only [one_div]
rw [inv_sub_inv (by have := hn' i; positivity) (by aesop)]
_ =ᶠ[atTop] (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ (log n - log (b i) - log n) / ((log (b i) + log n) * log n)) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with n hn
have : 0 < b i := R.b_pos i
rw [log_mul (by positivity) (by aesop), sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
_ = (fun (n : ℕ) => -log (b i) / ((log (b i) + log n) * log n)) := by ext; congr; ring
_ ~[atTop] (fun (n : ℕ) => -log (b i) / (log n * log n)) := by
refine IsEquivalent.div (IsEquivalent.refl) <| IsEquivalent.mul ?_ (IsEquivalent.refl)
have : (fun (n : ℕ) => log (b i) + log n) = fun (n : ℕ) => log n + log (b i) := by
ext; simp [add_comm]
rw [this]
exact IsEquivalent.add_isLittleO IsEquivalent.refl
<| IsLittleO.natCast_atTop (f := fun (_ : ℝ) => log (b i))
isLittleO_const_log_atTop
_ = (fun (n : ℕ) => -log (b i) / (log n)^2) := by ext; congr 1; rw [← pow_two]
lemma isTheta_smoothingFn_sub_self (i : α) :
(fun (n : ℕ) => ε (b i * n) - ε n) =Θ[atTop] fun n => 1 / (log n)^2 := by
calc (fun (n : ℕ) => ε (b i * n) - ε n) =Θ[atTop] fun n => (-log (b i)) / (log n)^2 := by
exact (R.isEquivalent_smoothingFn_sub_self i).isTheta
_ = fun (n : ℕ) => (-log (b i)) * 1 / (log n)^2 := by simp only [mul_one]
_ = fun (n : ℕ) => -log (b i) * (1 / (log n)^2) := by simp_rw [← mul_div_assoc]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => 1 / (log n)^2 := by
have : -log (b i) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero]
exact Real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one
(R.b_pos i) (ne_of_lt <| R.b_lt_one i)
rw [← isTheta_const_mul_right this]
/-!
#### Akra-Bazzi exponent `p`
Every Akra-Bazzi recurrence has an associated exponent, denoted by `p : ℝ`, such that
`∑ a_i b_i^p = 1`. This section shows the existence and uniqueness of this exponent `p` for any
`R : AkraBazziRecurrence`, and defines `R.asympBound` to be the asymptotic bound satisfied by `R`,
namely `n^p (1 + ∑_{u < n} g(u) / u^(p+1))`. -/
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_sumCoeffsExp : Continuous (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) := by
refine continuous_finset_sum Finset.univ fun i _ => Continuous.mul (by fun_prop) ?_
exact Continuous.rpow continuous_const continuous_id (fun x => Or.inl (ne_of_gt (R.b_pos i)))
lemma strictAnti_sumCoeffsExp : StrictAnti (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_fn]
refine Finset.sum_induction_nonempty _ _ (fun _ _ => StrictAnti.add) univ_nonempty ?terms
refine fun i _ => StrictAnti.const_mul ?_ (R.a_pos i)
exact Real.strictAnti_rpow_of_base_lt_one (R.b_pos i) (R.b_lt_one i)
lemma tendsto_zero_sumCoeffsExp : Tendsto (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have h₁ : Finset.univ.sum (fun _ : α => (0 : ℝ)) = 0 := by simp
rw [← h₁]
refine tendsto_finset_sum (univ : Finset α) (fun i _ => ?_)
rw [← mul_zero (a i)]
refine Tendsto.mul (by simp) <| tendsto_rpow_atTop_of_base_lt_one _ ?_ (R.b_lt_one i)
have := R.b_pos i
linarith
lemma tendsto_atTop_sumCoeffsExp : Tendsto (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) atBot atTop := by
have h₁ : Tendsto (fun p : ℝ => (a (max_bi b) : ℝ) * b (max_bi b) ^ p) atBot atTop :=
Tendsto.const_mul_atTop (R.a_pos (max_bi b)) <| tendsto_rpow_atBot_of_base_lt_one _
(by have := R.b_pos (max_bi b); linarith) (R.b_lt_one _)
refine tendsto_atTop_mono (fun p => ?_) h₁
refine Finset.single_le_sum (f := fun i => (a i : ℝ) * b i ^ p) (fun i _ => ?_) (mem_univ _)
have h₁ : 0 < a i := R.a_pos i
have h₂ : 0 < b i := R.b_pos i
positivity
lemma one_mem_range_sumCoeffsExp : 1 ∈ Set.range (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) := by
refine mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge R.continuous_sumCoeffsExp ?le_one ?ge_one
case le_one =>
exact R.tendsto_zero_sumCoeffsExp.eventually_le_const zero_lt_one |>.exists
case ge_one =>
exact R.tendsto_atTop_sumCoeffsExp.eventually_ge_atTop _ |>.exists
/-- The function x ↦ ∑ a_i b_i^x is injective. This implies the uniqueness of `p`. -/
lemma injective_sumCoeffsExp : Function.Injective (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) :=
R.strictAnti_sumCoeffsExp.injective
end
variable (a b) in
/-- The exponent `p` associated with a particular Akra-Bazzi recurrence. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def p : ℝ := Function.invFun (fun (p : ℝ) => ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p) 1
include R in
@[simp]
lemma sumCoeffsExp_p_eq_one : ∑ i, a i * (b i) ^ p a b = 1 := by
simp only [p]
exact Function.invFun_eq (by rw [← Set.mem_range]; exact R.one_mem_range_sumCoeffsExp)
/-!
#### The sum transform
This section defines the "sum transform" of a function `g` as
`∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico n₀ n, g u / u^(p+1)`,
and uses it to define `asympBound` as the bound satisfied by an Akra-Bazzi recurrence.
Several properties of the sum transform are then proven.
-/
/-- The transformation which turns a function `g` into
`n^p * ∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico n₀ n, g u / u^(p+1)`. -/
noncomputable def sumTransform (p : ℝ) (g : ℝ → ℝ) (n₀ n : ℕ) :=
n^p * ∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico n₀ n, g u / u^(p + 1)
lemma sumTransform_def {p : ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {n₀ n : ℕ} :
sumTransform p g n₀ n = n^p * ∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico n₀ n, g u / u^(p + 1) := rfl
variable (g) (a) (b)
/-- The asymptotic bound satisfied by an Akra-Bazzi recurrence, namely
`n^p (1 + ∑_{u < n} g(u) / u^(p+1))`. -/
noncomputable def asympBound (n : ℕ) : ℝ := n ^ p a b + sumTransform (p a b) g 0 n
lemma asympBound_def {α} [Fintype α] (a b : α → ℝ) {n : ℕ} :
asympBound g a b n = n ^ p a b + sumTransform (p a b) g 0 n := rfl
variable {g} {a} {b}
lemma asympBound_def' {α} [Fintype α] (a b : α → ℝ) {n : ℕ} :
asympBound g a b n = n ^ p a b * (1 + (∑ u ∈ range n, g u / u ^ (p a b + 1))) := by
simp [asympBound_def, sumTransform, mul_add, mul_one, Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range]
section
include R
lemma asympBound_pos (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : 0 < asympBound g a b n := by
calc 0 < (n : ℝ) ^ p a b * (1 + 0) := by aesop (add safe Real.rpow_pos_of_pos)
_ ≤ asympBound g a b n := by
simp only [asympBound_def']
gcongr n^p a b * (1 + ?_)
have := R.g_nonneg
aesop (add safe Real.rpow_nonneg,
safe div_nonneg,
safe Finset.sum_nonneg)
lemma eventually_asympBound_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, 0 < asympBound g a b n := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with n hn
exact R.asympBound_pos n hn
lemma eventually_asympBound_r_pos : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, 0 < asympBound g a b (r i n) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
exact fun i => (R.tendsto_atTop_r i).eventually R.eventually_asympBound_pos
lemma eventually_atTop_sumTransform_le :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n ≤ c * g n := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, hc₁⟩ := R.exists_eventually_const_mul_le_r
obtain ⟨c₂, hc₂_mem, hc₂⟩ := R.g_grows_poly.eventually_atTop_le_nat hc₁_mem
have hc₁_pos : 0 < c₁ := hc₁_mem.1
refine ⟨max c₂ (c₂ / c₁ ^ (p a b + 1)), by positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc₁, hc₂, R.eventually_r_pos, R.eventually_r_lt_n, eventually_gt_atTop 0]
with n hn₁ hn₂ hrpos hr_lt_n hn_pos
intro i
have hrpos_i := hrpos i
have g_nonneg : 0 ≤ g n := R.g_nonneg n (by positivity)
cases le_or_lt 0 (p a b + 1) with
| inl hp => -- 0 ≤ p a b + 1
calc sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n
= n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by rfl
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr with u hu
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have hu' : u ∈ Set.Icc (r i n) n := ⟨hu.1, by omega⟩
refine hn₂ u ?_
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, by norm_cast; omega⟩
calc c₁ * n ≤ r i n := by exact hn₁ i
_ ≤ u := by exact_mod_cast hu'.1
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ _u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / (r i n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr with u hu; rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu; exact hu.1
_ ≤ n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) • (c₂ * g n / r i n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact Finset.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ (fun x _ => by rfl)
_ = n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) * (c₂ * g n / r i n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = n ^ (p a b) * (n - r i n) * (c₂ * g n / (r i n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
congr; rw [Nat.card_Ico, Nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt <| hr_lt_n i)]
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * n * (c₂ * g n / (r i n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr; simp only [tsub_le_iff_right, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, Nat.cast_nonneg]
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * n * (c₂ * g n / (c₁ * n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact hn₁ i
_ = c₂ * g n * n ^ ((p a b) + 1) / (c₁ * n) ^ ((p a b) + 1) := by
rw [← Real.rpow_add_one (by positivity) (p a b)]; ring
_ = c₂ * g n * n ^ ((p a b) + 1) / (n ^ ((p a b) + 1) * c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
rw [mul_comm c₁, Real.mul_rpow (by positivity) (by positivity)]
_ = c₂ * g n * (n ^ ((p a b) + 1) / (n ^ ((p a b) + 1))) / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1) := by ring
_ = c₂ * g n / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1) := by rw [div_self (by positivity), mul_one]
_ = (c₂ / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * g n := by ring
_ ≤ max c₂ (c₂ / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * g n := by gcongr; exact le_max_right _ _
| inr hp => -- p a b + 1 < 0
calc sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n
= n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by rfl
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr with u hu
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have hu' : u ∈ Set.Icc (r i n) n := ⟨hu.1, by omega⟩
refine hn₂ u ?_
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, by norm_cast; omega⟩
calc c₁ * n ≤ r i n := by exact hn₁ i
_ ≤ u := by exact_mod_cast hu'.1
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ _u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr n ^ (p a b) * (Finset.Ico (r i n) n).sum (fun _ => c₂ * g n / ?_) with u hu
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have : 0 < u := calc
0 < r i n := by exact hrpos_i
_ ≤ u := by exact hu.1
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos (by positivity)
(by exact_mod_cast (le_of_lt hu.2)) (le_of_lt hp)
_ ≤ n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) • (c₂ * g n / n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact Finset.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ (fun x _ => by rfl)
_ = n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) * (c₂ * g n / n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = n ^ (p a b) * (n - r i n) * (c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
congr; rw [Nat.card_Ico, Nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt <| hr_lt_n i)]
_ ≤ n ^ (p a b) * n * (c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr; simp only [tsub_le_iff_right, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, Nat.cast_nonneg]
_ = c₂ * (n^((p a b) + 1) / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * g n := by
rw [← Real.rpow_add_one (by positivity) (p a b)]; ring
_ = c₂ * g n := by rw [div_self (by positivity), mul_one]
_ ≤ max c₂ (c₂ / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * g n := by gcongr; exact le_max_left _ _
lemma eventually_atTop_sumTransform_ge :
∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, c * g n ≤ sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n := by
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁_mem, hc₁⟩ := R.exists_eventually_const_mul_le_r
obtain ⟨c₂, hc₂_mem, hc₂⟩ := R.g_grows_poly.eventually_atTop_ge_nat hc₁_mem
obtain ⟨c₃, hc₃_mem, hc₃⟩ := R.exists_eventually_r_le_const_mul
have hc₁_pos : 0 < c₁ := hc₁_mem.1
have hc₃' : 0 < (1 - c₃) := by have := hc₃_mem.2; linarith
refine ⟨min (c₂ * (1 - c₃)) ((1 - c₃) * c₂ / c₁^((p a b) + 1)), by positivity, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc₁, hc₂, hc₃, R.eventually_r_pos, R.eventually_r_lt_n, eventually_gt_atTop 0]
with n hn₁ hn₂ hn₃ hrpos hr_lt_n hn_pos
intro i
have hrpos_i := hrpos i
have g_nonneg : 0 ≤ g n := R.g_nonneg n (by positivity)
cases le_or_gt 0 (p a b + 1) with
| inl hp => -- 0 ≤ (p a b) + 1
calc sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n
= n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := rfl
_ ≥ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / u^((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr with u hu
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have hu' : u ∈ Set.Icc (r i n) n := ⟨hu.1, by omega⟩
refine hn₂ u ?_
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, by norm_cast; omega⟩
calc c₁ * n ≤ r i n := by exact hn₁ i
_ ≤ u := by exact_mod_cast hu'.1
_ ≥ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ _u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr with u hu
· rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have := calc 0 < r i n := hrpos_i
_ ≤ u := hu.1
positivity
· rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
exact le_of_lt hu.2
_ ≥ n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) • (c₂ * g n / n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact Finset.card_nsmul_le_sum _ _ _ (fun x _ => by rfl)
_ = n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) * (c₂ * g n / n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = n ^ (p a b) * (n - r i n) * (c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
congr; rw [Nat.card_Ico, Nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt <| hr_lt_n i)]
_ ≥ n ^ (p a b) * (n - c₃ * n) * (c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact hn₃ i
_ = n ^ (p a b) * n * (1 - c₃) * (c₂ * g n / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by ring
_ = c₂ * (1 - c₃) * g n * (n ^ ((p a b) + 1) / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
rw [← Real.rpow_add_one (by positivity) (p a b)]; ring
_ = c₂ * (1 - c₃) * g n := by rw [div_self (by positivity), mul_one]
_ ≥ min (c₂ * (1 - c₃)) ((1 - c₃) * c₂ / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * g n := by
gcongr; exact min_le_left _ _
| inr hp => -- (p a b) + 1 < 0
calc sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n
= n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u^((p a b) + 1)) := by rfl
_ ≥ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr with u hu
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have hu' : u ∈ Set.Icc (r i n) n := ⟨hu.1, by omega⟩
refine hn₂ u ?_
rw [Set.mem_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, by norm_cast; omega⟩
calc c₁ * n ≤ r i n := by exact hn₁ i
_ ≤ u := by exact_mod_cast hu'.1
_ ≥ n ^ (p a b) * (∑ _u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, c₂ * g n / (r i n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr n^(p a b) * (Finset.Ico (r i n) n).sum (fun _ => c₂ * g n / ?_) with u hu
· rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
have := calc 0 < r i n := hrpos_i
_ ≤ u := hu.1
positivity
· rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hu
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos (by positivity)
(by exact_mod_cast hu.1) (le_of_lt hp)
_ ≥ n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) • (c₂ * g n / r i n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact Finset.card_nsmul_le_sum _ _ _ (fun x _ => by rfl)
_ = n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) * (c₂ * g n / r i n ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ ≥ n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) * (c₂ * g n / (c₁ * n) ^ (p a b + 1)) := by
gcongr n ^ p a b * #(Ico (r i n) n) * (c₂ * g n / ?_)
exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos (by positivity) (hn₁ i) (le_of_lt hp)
_ = n ^ (p a b) * (n - r i n) * (c₂ * g n / (c₁ * n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
congr; rw [Nat.card_Ico, Nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt <| hr_lt_n i)]
_ ≥ n ^ (p a b) * (n - c₃ * n) * (c₂ * g n / (c₁ * n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by
gcongr; exact hn₃ i
_ = n ^ (p a b) * n * (1 - c₃) * (c₂ * g n / (c₁ * n) ^ ((p a b) + 1)) := by ring
_ = n ^ (p a b) * n * (1 - c₃) * (c₂ * g n / (c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1) * n ^ ((p a b) + 1))) := by
rw [Real.mul_rpow (by positivity) (by positivity)]
_ = (n ^ ((p a b) + 1) / n ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * (1 - c₃) * c₂ * g n / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1) := by
rw [← Real.rpow_add_one (by positivity) (p a b)]; ring
_ = (1 - c₃) * c₂ / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1) * g n := by
rw [div_self (by positivity), one_mul]; ring
_ ≥ min (c₂ * (1 - c₃)) ((1 - c₃) * c₂ / c₁ ^ ((p a b) + 1)) * g n := by
gcongr; exact min_le_right _ _
end
/-!
#### Technical lemmas
The next several lemmas are technical lemmas leading up to `rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn_le` and
`rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn_ge`, which are key steps in the main proof.
-/
lemma eventually_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn (p : ℝ) :
deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z))
=ᶠ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * (1 - ε z) + z ^ (p-1) / (log z ^ 2) := calc
deriv (fun x => x ^ p * (1 - ε x))
=ᶠ[atTop] fun x => deriv (· ^ p) x * (1 - ε x) + x ^ p * deriv (1 - ε ·) x := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx
rw [deriv_mul]
· exact differentiableAt_rpow_const_of_ne _ (by positivity)
· exact differentiableAt_one_sub_smoothingFn hx
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => p * x ^ (p-1) * (1 - ε x) + x ^ p * (x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2)) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1, eventually_deriv_one_sub_smoothingFn]
with x hx hderiv
rw [hderiv, Real.deriv_rpow_const (Or.inl <| by positivity)]
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => p * x ^ (p-1) * (1 - ε x) + x ^ (p-1) / (log x ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [mul_div, ← Real.rpow_neg_one, ← Real.rpow_add (by positivity), sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma eventually_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn (p : ℝ) :
deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z))
=ᶠ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * (1 + ε z) - z ^ (p-1) / (log z ^ 2) := calc
deriv (fun x => x ^ p * (1 + ε x))
=ᶠ[atTop] fun x => deriv (· ^ p) x * (1 + ε x) + x ^ p * deriv (1 + ε ·) x := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx
rw [deriv_mul]
· exact differentiableAt_rpow_const_of_ne _ (by positivity)
· exact differentiableAt_one_add_smoothingFn hx
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => p * x ^ (p-1) * (1 + ε x) - x ^ p * (x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2)) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1, eventually_deriv_one_add_smoothingFn]
with x hx hderiv
simp [hderiv, Real.deriv_rpow_const (Or.inl <| by positivity), neg_div, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => p * x ^ (p-1) * (1 + ε x) - x ^ (p-1) / (log x ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
simp [mul_div, ← Real.rpow_neg_one, ← Real.rpow_add (by positivity), sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma isEquivalent_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z)) ~[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := calc
deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z))
=ᶠ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * (1 - ε z) + z^(p-1) / (log z ^ 2) :=
eventually_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn p
_ ~[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := by
refine IsEquivalent.add_isLittleO ?one ?two
case one => calc
(fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * (1 - ε z)) ~[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * 1 :=
IsEquivalent.mul IsEquivalent.refl isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one
_ = fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := by ext; ring
case two => calc
(fun z => z ^ (p-1) / (log z ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun z => z ^ (p-1) / 1 := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _)
(IsLittleO.inv_rev ?_ (by simp))
rw [isLittleO_const_left]
refine Or.inr <| Tendsto.comp tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop ?_
exact Tendsto.comp (g := fun z => z ^ 2)
(tendsto_pow_atTop (by norm_num)) tendsto_log_atTop
_ = fun z => z ^ (p-1) := by ext; simp
_ =Θ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := by
exact IsTheta.const_mul_right hp <| isTheta_refl _ _
lemma isEquivalent_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z)) ~[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := calc
deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z))
=ᶠ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * (1 + ε z) - z ^ (p-1) / (log z ^ 2) :=
eventually_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn p
_ ~[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := by
refine IsEquivalent.add_isLittleO ?one ?two
case one => calc
(fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * (1 + ε z)) ~[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) * 1 :=
IsEquivalent.mul IsEquivalent.refl isEquivalent_one_add_smoothingFn_one
_ = fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := by ext; ring
case two => calc
(fun z => -(z ^ (p-1) / (log z ^ 2))) =o[atTop] fun z => z ^ (p-1) / 1 := by
simp_rw [isLittleO_neg_left, div_eq_mul_inv]
refine IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _)
(IsLittleO.inv_rev ?_ (by simp))
rw [isLittleO_const_left]
refine Or.inr <| Tendsto.comp tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop ?_
exact Tendsto.comp (g := fun z => z ^ 2)
(tendsto_pow_atTop (by norm_num)) tendsto_log_atTop
_ = fun z => z ^ (p-1) := by ext; simp
_ =Θ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) := by
exact IsTheta.const_mul_right hp <| isTheta_refl _ _
lemma isTheta_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(fun x => ‖deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z)) x‖) =Θ[atTop] fun z => z ^ (p-1) := by
refine IsTheta.norm_left ?_
calc (fun x => deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z)) x) =Θ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) :=
(isEquivalent_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn hp).isTheta
_ =Θ[atTop] fun z => z ^ (p-1) :=
IsTheta.const_mul_left hp <| isTheta_refl _ _
lemma isTheta_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(fun x => ‖deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z)) x‖) =Θ[atTop] fun z => z ^ (p-1) := by
refine IsTheta.norm_left ?_
calc (fun x => deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z)) x) =Θ[atTop] fun z => p * z ^ (p-1) :=
(isEquivalent_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn hp).isTheta
_ =Θ[atTop] fun z => z ^ (p-1) :=
IsTheta.const_mul_left hp <| isTheta_refl _ _
lemma growsPolynomially_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn (p : ℝ) :
GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z)) x‖ := by
cases eq_or_ne p 0 with
| inl hp => -- p = 0
have h₁ : (fun x => ‖deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 - ε z)) x‖)
=ᶠ[atTop] fun z => z⁻¹ / (log z ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_deriv_one_sub_smoothingFn, eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx hx_pos
have : 0 ≤ x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := by
have hlog : 0 < log x := Real.log_pos hx_pos
positivity
simp only [hp, Real.rpow_zero, one_mul, differentiableAt_const, hx, Real.norm_of_nonneg this]
refine GrowsPolynomially.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ ?_
refine GrowsPolynomially.div (GrowsPolynomially.inv growsPolynomially_id)
(GrowsPolynomially.pow 2 growsPolynomially_log ?_)
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 1] with _ hx
exact log_nonneg hx
| inr hp => -- p ≠ 0
refine GrowsPolynomially.of_isTheta (growsPolynomially_rpow (p-1))
(isTheta_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn hp) ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with _ _
positivity
lemma growsPolynomially_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn (p : ℝ) :
GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z)) x‖ := by
cases eq_or_ne p 0 with
| inl hp => -- p = 0
have h₁ : (fun x => ‖deriv (fun z => z ^ p * (1 + ε z)) x‖)
=ᶠ[atTop] fun z => z⁻¹ / (log z ^ 2) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_deriv_one_add_smoothingFn, eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx hx_pos
have : 0 ≤ x⁻¹ / (log x ^ 2) := by
have hlog : 0 < log x := Real.log_pos hx_pos
positivity
simp only [neg_div, norm_neg, hp, Real.rpow_zero,
one_mul, differentiableAt_const, hx, Real.norm_of_nonneg this]
refine GrowsPolynomially.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ ?_
refine GrowsPolynomially.div (GrowsPolynomially.inv growsPolynomially_id)
(GrowsPolynomially.pow 2 growsPolynomially_log ?_)
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 1] with x hx
exact log_nonneg hx
| inr hp => -- p ≠ 0
refine GrowsPolynomially.of_isTheta (growsPolynomially_rpow (p-1))
(isTheta_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn hp) ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with _ _
positivity
include R
lemma isBigO_apply_r_sub_b (q : ℝ → ℝ) (hq_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1))
(hq_poly : GrowsPolynomially fun x => ‖deriv q x‖) (i : α) :
(fun n => q (r i n) - q (b i * n)) =O[atTop] fun n => (deriv q n) * (r i n - b i * n) := by
let b' := b (min_bi b) / 2
have hb_pos : 0 < b' := by have := R.b_pos (min_bi b); positivity
have hb_lt_one : b' < 1 := calc
b (min_bi b) / 2 < b (min_bi b) := by exact div_two_lt_of_pos (R.b_pos (min_bi b))
_ < 1 := R.b_lt_one (min_bi b)
have hb : b' ∈ Set.Ioo 0 1 := ⟨hb_pos, hb_lt_one⟩
have hb' : ∀ i, b' ≤ b i := fun i => calc
b (min_bi b) / 2 ≤ b i / 2 := by gcongr; aesop
_ ≤ b i := by exact le_of_lt <| div_two_lt_of_pos (R.b_pos i)
obtain ⟨c₁, _, c₂, _, hq_poly⟩ := hq_poly b' hb
rw [isBigO_iff]
refine ⟨c₂, ?_⟩
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun x => b' * x) atTop atTop :=
Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb_pos tendsto_id
filter_upwards [hq_poly.natCast_atTop, R.eventually_bi_mul_le_r, eventually_ge_atTop R.n₀,
eventually_gt_atTop 0, (h_tendsto.eventually_gt_atTop 1).natCast_atTop] with
n hn h_bi_le_r h_ge_n₀ h_n_pos h_bn
rw [norm_mul, ← mul_assoc]
refine Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le
(s := Set.Icc (b'*n) n) (fun z hz => ?diff) (fun z hz => (hn z hz).2)
(convex_Icc _ _) ?mem_Icc <| ⟨h_bi_le_r i, by exact_mod_cast (le_of_lt (R.r_lt_n i n h_ge_n₀))⟩
case diff =>
refine hq_diff.differentiableAt (Ioi_mem_nhds ?_)
calc 1 < b' * n := by exact h_bn
_ ≤ z := hz.1
case mem_Icc =>
refine ⟨by gcongr; exact hb' i, ?_⟩
calc b i * n ≤ 1 * n := by gcongr; exact le_of_lt <| R.b_lt_one i
_ = n := by simp
lemma rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn_le :
∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, (r i n) ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε (r i n))
≤ (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
intro i
let q : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => x ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε x)
have h_diff_q : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1) := by
refine DifferentiableOn.mul
(DifferentiableOn.mono (differentiableOn_rpow_const _) fun z hz => ?_)
differentiableOn_one_sub_smoothingFn
rw [Set.mem_compl_singleton_iff]
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hz
exact ne_of_gt <| zero_lt_one.trans hz
have h_deriv_q : deriv q =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := calc
deriv q = deriv fun x => (fun z => z ^ (p a b)) x * (fun z => 1 - ε z) x := by rfl
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => deriv (fun z => z ^ (p a b)) x * (1 - ε x) +
x ^ (p a b) * deriv (fun z => 1 - ε z) x := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0, eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx hx'
rw [deriv_mul] <;> aesop
_ =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := by
refine IsBigO.add ?left ?right
case left => calc
(fun x => deriv (fun z => z ^ (p a b)) x * (1 - ε x))
=O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) * (1 - ε x) := by
exact IsBigO.mul (isBigO_deriv_rpow_const_atTop (p a b)) (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) * 1 := by
refine IsBigO.mul (isBigO_refl _ _)
isEquivalent_one_sub_smoothingFn_one.isBigO
_ = fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := by ext; rw [mul_one]
case right => calc
(fun x => x ^ (p a b) * deriv (fun z => 1 - ε z) x)
=O[atTop] (fun x => x ^ (p a b) * x⁻¹) := by
exact IsBigO.mul (isBigO_refl _ _) isLittleO_deriv_one_sub_smoothingFn.isBigO
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [← Real.rpow_neg_one, ← Real.rpow_add hx, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
have h_main_norm : (fun (n : ℕ) => ‖q (r i n) - q (b i * n)‖)
≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => ‖(b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n)‖ := by
refine IsLittleO.eventuallyLE ?_
calc
(fun (n : ℕ) => q (r i n) - q (b i * n))
=O[atTop] fun n => (deriv q n) * (r i n - b i * n) := by
exact R.isBigO_apply_r_sub_b q h_diff_q
(growsPolynomially_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn (p a b)) i
_ =o[atTop] fun n => (deriv q n) * (n / log n ^ 2) := by
exact IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _) (R.dist_r_b i)
_ =O[atTop] fun n => n^((p a b) - 1) * (n / log n ^ 2) := by
exact IsBigO.mul (IsBigO.natCast_atTop h_deriv_q) (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun n => n^(p a b) / (log n) ^ 2 := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with n hn
have hn' : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by positivity
simp [← mul_div_assoc, ← Real.rpow_add_one hn']
_ = fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) ^ (p a b) * (1 / (log n)^2) := by
simp_rw [mul_div, mul_one]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 / (log n)^2) := by
refine IsTheta.symm ?_
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
refine IsTheta.const_mul_left ?_ (isTheta_refl _ _)
have := R.b_pos i; positivity
_ =Θ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i)^(p a b) * n^(p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n) := by
exact IsTheta.symm <| IsTheta.mul (isTheta_refl _ _)
<| R.isTheta_smoothingFn_sub_self i
have h_main : (fun (n : ℕ) => q (r i n) - q (b i * n))
≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n) := by
calc (fun (n : ℕ) => q (r i n) - q (b i * n))
≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => ‖q (r i n) - q (b i * n)‖ := by
filter_upwards with _; exact le_norm_self _
_ ≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => ‖(b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n)‖ :=
h_main_norm
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop ⌈(b i)⁻¹⌉₊, eventually_gt_atTop 1] with n hn hn'
refine norm_of_nonneg ?_
have h₁ := R.b_pos i
have h₂ : 0 ≤ ε (b i * n) - ε n := by
refine sub_nonneg_of_le <|
(strictAntiOn_smoothingFn.le_iff_le ?n_gt_one ?bn_gt_one).mpr ?le
case n_gt_one =>
rwa [Set.mem_Ioi, Nat.one_lt_cast]
case bn_gt_one =>
calc 1 = b i * (b i)⁻¹ := by rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ (by positivity)]
_ ≤ b i * ⌈(b i)⁻¹⌉₊ := by gcongr; exact Nat.le_ceil _
_ < b i * n := by gcongr
case le => calc b i * n ≤ 1 * n := by have := R.b_lt_one i; gcongr
_ = n := by rw [one_mul]
positivity
filter_upwards [h_main] with n hn
have h₁ : q (b i * n) + (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n)
= (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n) := by
have := R.b_pos i
simp only [q, mul_rpow (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ b i) (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ n)]
ring
show q (r i n) ≤ (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n)
rw [← h₁, ← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact hn
lemma rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn_ge :
∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ i, (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n)
≤ (r i n) ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε (r i n)) := by
rw [Filter.eventually_all]
intro i
let q : ℝ → ℝ := fun x => x ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε x)
have h_diff_q : DifferentiableOn ℝ q (Set.Ioi 1) := by
refine DifferentiableOn.mul
(DifferentiableOn.mono (differentiableOn_rpow_const _) fun z hz => ?_)
differentiableOn_one_add_smoothingFn
rw [Set.mem_compl_singleton_iff]
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hz
exact ne_of_gt <| zero_lt_one.trans hz
have h_deriv_q : deriv q =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := calc
deriv q = deriv fun x => (fun z => z ^ (p a b)) x * (fun z => 1 + ε z) x := by rfl
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => deriv (fun z => z ^ (p a b)) x * (1 + ε x)
+ x ^ (p a b) * deriv (fun z => 1 + ε z) x := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0, eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx hx'
rw [deriv_mul] <;> aesop
_ =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := by
refine IsBigO.add ?left ?right
case left => calc
(fun x => deriv (fun z => z ^ (p a b)) x * (1 + ε x))
=O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) * (1 + ε x) := by
exact IsBigO.mul (isBigO_deriv_rpow_const_atTop (p a b)) (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) * 1 :=
IsBigO.mul (isBigO_refl _ _) isEquivalent_one_add_smoothingFn_one.isBigO
_ = fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := by ext; rw [mul_one]
case right => calc
(fun x => x ^ (p a b) * deriv (fun z => 1 + ε z) x)
=O[atTop] (fun x => x ^ (p a b) * x⁻¹) := by
exact IsBigO.mul (isBigO_refl _ _)
isLittleO_deriv_one_add_smoothingFn.isBigO
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x => x ^ ((p a b) - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [← Real.rpow_neg_one, ← Real.rpow_add hx, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
have h_main_norm : (fun (n : ℕ) => ‖q (r i n) - q (b i * n)‖)
≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => ‖(b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n)‖ := by
refine IsLittleO.eventuallyLE ?_
calc
(fun (n : ℕ) => q (r i n) - q (b i * n))
=O[atTop] fun n => (deriv q n) * (r i n - b i * n) := by
exact R.isBigO_apply_r_sub_b q h_diff_q
(growsPolynomially_deriv_rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn (p a b)) i
_ =o[atTop] fun n => (deriv q n) * (n / log n ^ 2) := by
exact IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _) (R.dist_r_b i)
_ =O[atTop] fun n => n ^ ((p a b) - 1) * (n / log n ^ 2) := by
exact IsBigO.mul (IsBigO.natCast_atTop h_deriv_q) (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun n => n ^ (p a b) / (log n) ^ 2 := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with n hn
have hn' : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by positivity
simp [← mul_div_assoc, ← Real.rpow_add_one hn']
_ = fun (n : ℕ) => (n : ℝ) ^ (p a b) * (1 / (log n) ^ 2) := by simp_rw [mul_div, mul_one]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 / (log n) ^ 2) := by
refine IsTheta.symm ?_
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
refine IsTheta.const_mul_left ?_ (isTheta_refl _ _)
have := R.b_pos i; positivity
_ =Θ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n) := by
exact IsTheta.symm <| IsTheta.mul (isTheta_refl _ _)
<| R.isTheta_smoothingFn_sub_self i
have h_main : (fun (n : ℕ) => q (b i * n) - q (r i n))
≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n) := by
calc (fun (n : ℕ) => q (b i * n) - q (r i n))
≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => ‖q (r i n) - q (b i * n)‖ := by
filter_upwards with _; rw [norm_sub_rev]; exact le_norm_self _
_ ≤ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => ‖(b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n)‖ :=
h_main_norm
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun (n : ℕ) => (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop ⌈(b i)⁻¹⌉₊, eventually_gt_atTop 1] with n hn hn'
refine norm_of_nonneg ?_
have h₁ := R.b_pos i
have h₂ : 0 ≤ ε (b i * n) - ε n := by
refine sub_nonneg_of_le <|
(strictAntiOn_smoothingFn.le_iff_le ?n_gt_one ?bn_gt_one).mpr ?le
case n_gt_one =>
show 1 < (n : ℝ)
rw [Nat.one_lt_cast]
exact hn'
case bn_gt_one =>
calc 1 = b i * (b i)⁻¹ := by rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ (by positivity)]
_ ≤ b i * ⌈(b i)⁻¹⌉₊ := by gcongr; exact Nat.le_ceil _
_ < b i * n := by gcongr
case le => calc b i * n ≤ 1 * n := by have := R.b_lt_one i; gcongr
_ = n := by rw [one_mul]
positivity
filter_upwards [h_main] with n hn
have h₁ : q (b i * n) - (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (ε (b i * n) - ε n)
= (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n) := by
have := R.b_pos i
simp only [q, mul_rpow (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ b i) (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ n)]
ring
show (b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n) ≤ q (r i n)
rw [← h₁, sub_le_iff_le_add', ← sub_le_iff_le_add]
exact hn
/-!
#### Main proof
This final section proves the Akra-Bazzi theorem.
-/
lemma base_nonempty {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : (Finset.Ico (⌊b (min_bi b) / 2 * n⌋₊) n).Nonempty := by
let b' := b (min_bi b)
have hb_pos : 0 < b' := R.b_pos _
simp_rw [Finset.nonempty_Ico]
exact_mod_cast calc ⌊b' / 2 * n⌋₊ ≤ b' / 2 * n := by exact Nat.floor_le (by positivity)
_ < 1 / 2 * n := by gcongr; exact R.b_lt_one (min_bi b)
_ ≤ 1 * n := by gcongr; norm_num
_ = n := by simp
/-- The main proof of the upper bound part of the Akra-Bazzi theorem. The factor
`1 - ε n` does not change the asymptotic order, but is needed for the induction step to go
through. -/
lemma T_isBigO_smoothingFn_mul_asympBound :
T =O[atTop] (fun n => (1 - ε n) * asympBound g a b n) := by
let b' := b (min_bi b) / 2
have hb_pos : 0 < b' := R.bi_min_div_two_pos
rw [isBigO_atTop_iff_eventually_exists]
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁, h_sumTransform_aux⟩ := R.eventually_atTop_sumTransform_ge
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop R.n₀, -- n₀_ge_Rn₀
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos, -- h_smoothing_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr
<| eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_gt_const (1/2) (by norm_num), -- h_smoothing_gt_half
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_asympBound_pos, -- h_asympBound_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_asympBound_r_pos, -- h_asympBound_r_pos
(tendsto_nat_floor_mul_atTop b' hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop
R.eventually_asympBound_pos, -- h_asympBound_floor
eventually_gt_atTop 0, -- n₀_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_r_pos, -- h_smoothing_r_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.rpow_p_mul_one_sub_smoothingFn_le, -- bound1
(tendsto_nat_floor_mul_atTop b' hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop
eventually_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos, -- h_smoothingFn_floor
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr h_sumTransform_aux, -- h_sumTransform
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_bi_mul_le_r] -- h_bi_le_r
with n₀ n₀_ge_Rn₀ h_smoothing_pos h_smoothing_gt_half
h_asympBound_pos h_asympBound_r_pos h_asympBound_floor n₀_pos h_smoothing_r_pos
bound1 h_smoothingFn_floor h_sumTransform h_bi_le_r
-- Max of the ratio `T(n) / asympBound(n)` over the base case `n ∈ [b * n₀, n₀)`
have h_base_nonempty := R.base_nonempty n₀_pos
let base_max : ℝ :=
(Finset.Ico (⌊b' * n₀⌋₊) n₀).sup' h_base_nonempty
fun n => T n / ((1 - ε n) * asympBound g a b n)
-- The big-O constant we are aiming for: max of the base case ratio and what we need to
-- cancel out the `g(n)` term in the calculation below
set C := max (2 * c₁⁻¹) base_max with hC
refine ⟨C, fun n hn => ?_⟩
-- Base case: statement is true for `b' * n₀ ≤ n < n₀`
have h_base : ∀ n ∈ Finset.Ico (⌊b' * n₀⌋₊) n₀, T n ≤ C * ((1 - ε n) * asympBound g a b n) := by
intro n hn
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hn
have htmp1 : 0 < 1 - ε n := h_smoothingFn_floor n hn.1
have htmp2 : 0 < asympBound g a b n := h_asympBound_floor n hn.1
rw [← _root_.div_le_iff₀ (by positivity)]
rw [← Finset.mem_Ico] at hn
calc T n / ((1 - ε ↑n) * asympBound g a b n)
≤ (Finset.Ico (⌊b' * n₀⌋₊) n₀).sup' h_base_nonempty
(fun z => T z / ((1 - ε z) * asympBound g a b z)) :=
Finset.le_sup'_of_le _ (b := n) hn le_rfl
_ ≤ C := le_max_right _ _
have h_asympBound_pos' : 0 < asympBound g a b n := h_asympBound_pos n hn
have h_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos' : 0 < 1 - ε n := h_smoothing_pos n hn
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (R.T_nonneg n), Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
-- We now prove all other cases by induction
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind n h_ind =>
have b_mul_n₀_le_ri i : ⌊b' * ↑n₀⌋₊ ≤ r i n := by
exact_mod_cast calc ⌊b' * (n₀ : ℝ)⌋₊ ≤ b' * n₀ := Nat.floor_le <| by positivity
_ ≤ b' * n := by gcongr
_ ≤ r i n := h_bi_le_r n hn i
have g_pos : 0 ≤ g n := R.g_nonneg n (by positivity)
calc
T n = (∑ i, a i * T (r i n)) + g n := by exact R.h_rec n <| n₀_ge_Rn₀.trans hn
_ ≤ (∑ i, a i * (C * ((1 - ε (r i n)) * asympBound g a b (r i n)))) + g n := by
-- Apply the induction hypothesis, or use the base case depending on how large n is
gcongr (∑ i, a i * ?_) + g n with i _
· exact le_of_lt <| R.a_pos _
· if ri_lt_n₀ : r i n < n₀ then
exact h_base _ <| by
simp_all only [gt_iff_lt, Nat.ofNat_pos, div_pos_iff_of_pos_right,
eventually_atTop, sub_pos, one_div, mem_Ico, and_imp,
forall_true_left, mem_univ, and_self, b', C, base_max]
else
push_neg at ri_lt_n₀
exact h_ind (r i n) (R.r_lt_n _ _ (n₀_ge_Rn₀.trans hn)) ri_lt_n₀
(h_asympBound_r_pos _ hn _) (h_smoothing_r_pos n hn i)
_ = (∑ i, a i * (C * ((1 - ε (r i n)) * ((r i n) ^ (p a b)
* (1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))))))) + g n := by
simp_rw [asympBound_def']
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((r i n) ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε (r i n))
* ((1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))))) + g n := by
congr; ext; ring
_ ≤ (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n)
* ((1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))))) + g n := by
gcongr (∑ i, C * a i * (?_
* ((1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))))) + g n with i
· have := R.a_pos i
positivity
· refine add_nonneg zero_le_one <| Finset.sum_nonneg fun j _ => ?_
rw [div_nonneg_iff]
exact Or.inl ⟨R.g_nonneg j (by positivity), by positivity⟩
· exact bound1 n hn i
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n)
* ((1 + ((∑ u ∈ range n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))
- (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))))))) + g n := by
congr; ext i; congr
refine eq_sub_of_add_eq ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_eq_of_eq_sub <| Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub _
<| le_of_lt <| R.r_lt_n i n <| n₀_ge_Rn₀.trans hn
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n) * ((n ^ (p a b)
* (1 + (∑ u ∈ range n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))
- n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))))))
+ g n := by
congr; ext; ring
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n)
* ((asympBound g a b n - sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n)))) + g n := by
simp_rw [asympBound_def', sumTransform_def]
_ ≤ (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * (1 - ε n)
* ((asympBound g a b n - c₁ * g n)))) + g n := by
gcongr with i
· have := R.a_pos i
positivity
· have := R.b_pos i
positivity
· exact h_sumTransform n hn i
_ = (∑ i, C * (1 - ε n) * ((asympBound g a b n - c₁ * g n))
* (a i * (b i) ^ (p a b))) + g n := by
congr; ext; ring
_ = C * (1 - ε n) * (asympBound g a b n - c₁ * g n) + g n := by
rw [← Finset.mul_sum, R.sumCoeffsExp_p_eq_one, mul_one]
_ = C * (1 - ε n) * asympBound g a b n + (1 - C * c₁ * (1 - ε n)) * g n := by ring
_ ≤ C * (1 - ε n) * asympBound g a b n + 0 := by
gcongr
refine mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ?_ g_pos
rw [sub_nonpos]
calc 1 ≤ 2 * (c₁⁻¹ * c₁) * (1/2) := by
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ (by positivity : c₁ ≠ 0)]; norm_num
_ = (2 * c₁⁻¹) * c₁ * (1/2) := by ring
_ ≤ C * c₁ * (1 - ε n) := by gcongr
· rw [hC]; exact le_max_left _ _
· exact le_of_lt <| h_smoothing_gt_half n hn
_ = C * ((1 - ε n) * asympBound g a b n) := by ring
/-- The main proof of the lower bound part of the Akra-Bazzi theorem. The factor
`1 + ε n` does not change the asymptotic order, but is needed for the induction step to go
through. -/
lemma smoothingFn_mul_asympBound_isBigO_T :
(fun (n : ℕ) => (1 + ε n) * asympBound g a b n) =O[atTop] T := by
let b' := b (min_bi b) / 2
have hb_pos : 0 < b' := R.bi_min_div_two_pos
rw [isBigO_atTop_iff_eventually_exists_pos]
obtain ⟨c₁, hc₁, h_sumTransform_aux⟩ := R.eventually_atTop_sumTransform_le
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop R.n₀, -- n₀_ge_Rn₀
(tendsto_nat_floor_mul_atTop b' hb_pos).eventually_gt_atTop 0, -- h_b_floor
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_pos, -- h_smoothing_pos
(tendsto_nat_floor_mul_atTop b' hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop
eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_pos, -- h_smoothing_pos'
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_asympBound_pos, -- h_asympBound_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_asympBound_r_pos, -- h_asympBound_r_pos
(tendsto_nat_floor_mul_atTop b' hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop
R.eventually_asympBound_pos, -- h_asympBound_floor
eventually_gt_atTop 0, -- n₀_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_r_pos, -- h_smoothing_r_pos
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.rpow_p_mul_one_add_smoothingFn_ge, -- bound2
(tendsto_nat_floor_mul_atTop b' hb_pos).eventually_forall_ge_atTop
eventually_one_add_smoothingFn_pos, -- h_smoothingFn_floor
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr h_sumTransform_aux, -- h_sumTransform
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr R.eventually_bi_mul_le_r, -- h_bi_le_r
eventually_forall_ge_atTop.mpr (eventually_ge_atTop ⌈exp 1⌉₊)] -- h_exp
with n₀ n₀_ge_Rn₀ h_b_floor h_smoothing_pos h_smoothing_pos' h_asympBound_pos h_asympBound_r_pos
h_asympBound_floor n₀_pos h_smoothing_r_pos bound2 h_smoothingFn_floor h_sumTransform
h_bi_le_r h_exp
have h_base_nonempty := R.base_nonempty n₀_pos
-- Min of the ratio T(n) / asympBound(n) over the base case n ∈ [b * n₀, n₀)
set base_min : ℝ :=
(Finset.Ico (⌊b' * n₀⌋₊) n₀).inf' h_base_nonempty
(fun n => T n / ((1 + ε n) * asympBound g a b n)) with base_min_def
-- The big-O constant we are aiming for: min of the base case ratio and what we need to cancel
-- out the g(n) term in the calculation below
let C := min (2 * c₁)⁻¹ base_min
have hC_pos : 0 < C := by
refine lt_min (by positivity) ?_
obtain ⟨m, hm_mem, hm⟩ :=
Finset.exists_mem_eq_inf' h_base_nonempty (fun n => T n / ((1 + ε n) * asympBound g a b n))
calc 0 < T m / ((1 + ε m) * asympBound g a b m) := by
have H₁ : 0 < T m := by exact R.T_pos _
have H₂ : 0 < 1 + ε m := by rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hm_mem
exact h_smoothing_pos' m hm_mem.1
have H₃ : 0 < asympBound g a b m := by
refine R.asympBound_pos m ?_
calc 0 < ⌊b' * n₀⌋₊ := by exact h_b_floor
_ ≤ m := by rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hm_mem; exact hm_mem.1
positivity
_ = base_min := by rw [base_min_def, hm]
refine ⟨C, hC_pos, fun n hn => ?_⟩
-- Base case: statement is true for `b' * n₀ ≤ n < n₀`
have h_base : ∀ n ∈ Finset.Ico (⌊b' * n₀⌋₊) n₀, C * ((1 + ε n) * asympBound g a b n) ≤ T n := by
intro n hn
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hn
have htmp1 : 0 < 1 + ε n := h_smoothingFn_floor n hn.1
have htmp2 : 0 < asympBound g a b n := h_asympBound_floor n hn.1
rw [← _root_.le_div_iff₀ (by positivity)]
rw [← Finset.mem_Ico] at hn
calc T n / ((1 + ε ↑n) * asympBound g a b n)
≥ (Finset.Ico (⌊b' * n₀⌋₊) n₀).inf' h_base_nonempty
fun z => T z / ((1 + ε z) * asympBound g a b z) :=
Finset.inf'_le_of_le _ (b := n) hn <| le_refl _
_ ≥ C := min_le_right _ _
have h_asympBound_pos' : 0 < asympBound g a b n := h_asympBound_pos n hn
have h_one_sub_smoothingFn_pos' : 0 < 1 + ε n := h_smoothing_pos n hn
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (R.T_nonneg n), Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
-- We now prove all other cases by induction
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind n h_ind =>
have b_mul_n₀_le_ri i : ⌊b' * ↑n₀⌋₊ ≤ r i n := by
exact_mod_cast calc ⌊b' * ↑n₀⌋₊ ≤ b' * n₀ := Nat.floor_le <| by positivity
_ ≤ b' * n := by gcongr
_ ≤ r i n := h_bi_le_r n hn i
have g_pos : 0 ≤ g n := R.g_nonneg n (by positivity)
calc
T n = (∑ i, a i * T (r i n)) + g n := by exact R.h_rec n <| n₀_ge_Rn₀.trans hn
_ ≥ (∑ i, a i * (C * ((1 + ε (r i n)) * asympBound g a b (r i n)))) + g n := by
-- Apply the induction hypothesis, or use the base case depending on how large `n` is
gcongr (∑ i, a i * ?_) + g n with i _
· exact le_of_lt <| R.a_pos _
· cases lt_or_le (r i n) n₀ with
| inl ri_lt_n₀ => exact h_base _ <| Finset.mem_Ico.mpr ⟨b_mul_n₀_le_ri i, ri_lt_n₀⟩
| inr n₀_le_ri =>
exact h_ind (r i n) (R.r_lt_n _ _ (n₀_ge_Rn₀.trans hn)) n₀_le_ri
(h_asympBound_r_pos _ hn _) (h_smoothing_r_pos n hn i)
_ = (∑ i, a i * (C * ((1 + ε (r i n)) * ((r i n) ^ (p a b)
* (1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))))))) + g n := by
simp_rw [asympBound_def']
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((r i n)^(p a b) * (1 + ε (r i n))
* ((1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))))) + g n := by
congr; ext; ring
_ ≥ (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n)
* ((1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))))) + g n := by
gcongr (∑ i, C * a i * (?_ *
((1 + (∑ u ∈ range (r i n), g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))))) + g n with i
· have := R.a_pos i
positivity
· refine add_nonneg zero_le_one <| Finset.sum_nonneg fun j _ => ?_
rw [div_nonneg_iff]
exact Or.inl ⟨R.g_nonneg j (by positivity), by positivity⟩
· exact bound2 n hn i
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * n ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n)
* ((1 + ((∑ u ∈ range n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))
- (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))))))) + g n := by
congr; ext i; congr
refine eq_sub_of_add_eq ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_eq_of_eq_sub <| Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub _
<| le_of_lt <| R.r_lt_n i n <| n₀_ge_Rn₀.trans hn
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n)
* ((n ^ (p a b) * (1 + (∑ u ∈ range n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1)))
- n ^ (p a b) * (∑ u ∈ Finset.Ico (r i n) n, g u / u ^ ((p a b) + 1))))))
+ g n := by
congr; ext; ring
_ = (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n)
* ((asympBound g a b n - sumTransform (p a b) g (r i n) n)))) + g n := by
simp_rw [asympBound_def', sumTransform_def]
_ ≥ (∑ i, C * a i * ((b i) ^ (p a b) * (1 + ε n)
* ((asympBound g a b n - c₁ * g n)))) + g n := by
gcongr with i
· have := R.a_pos i
positivity
· have := R.b_pos i
positivity
· exact h_sumTransform n hn i
| _ = (∑ i, C * (1 + ε n) * ((asympBound g a b n - c₁ * g n))
* (a i * (b i) ^ (p a b))) + g n := by congr; ext; ring
_ = C * (1 + ε n) * (asympBound g a b n - c₁ * g n) + g n := by
rw [← Finset.mul_sum, R.sumCoeffsExp_p_eq_one, mul_one]
_ = C * (1 + ε n) * asympBound g a b n + (1 - C * c₁ * (1 + ε n)) * g n := by ring
_ ≥ C * (1 + ε n) * asympBound g a b n + 0 := by
gcongr
refine mul_nonneg ?_ g_pos
rw [sub_nonneg]
calc C * c₁ * (1 + ε n) ≤ C * c₁ * 2 := by
| Mathlib/Computability/AkraBazzi/AkraBazzi.lean | 1,440 | 1,449 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Renaming variables of polynomials
This file establishes the `rename` operation on multivariate polynomials,
which modifies the set of variables.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.rename`
* `MvPolynomial.renameEquiv`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ α : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R S : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` `[CommSemiring S]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R` elements of the coefficient ring
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ α`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {σ τ α R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
namespace MvPolynomial
section Rename
/-- Rename all the variables in a multivariable polynomial. -/
def rename (f : σ → τ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval (X ∘ f)
theorem rename_C (f : σ → τ) (r : R) : rename f (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem rename_X (f : σ → τ) (i : σ) : rename f (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X (f i) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
theorem map_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p
(fun a => by simp only [map_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, map_add]) fun p n hp => by
simp only [hp, rename_X, map_X, map_mul]
lemma map_comp_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) :
(map f).comp (rename g).toRingHom = (rename g).toRingHom.comp (map f) :=
RingHom.ext fun p ↦ map_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _ by
simp only [rename, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
-- Porting note: the Lean 3 proof of this was very fragile and included a nonterminal `simp`.
-- Hopefully this is less prone to breaking
rw [eval₂_comp_left (eval₂Hom (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial α R)) (X ∘ g)) C (X ∘ f) p]
simp only [comp_def, eval₂Hom_X']
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext1; simp only [comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, eval₂Hom_C]
lemma rename_comp_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) :
(rename (R := R) g).comp (rename f) = rename (g ∘ f) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ rename_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_id : rename id = AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ eval₂_eta p
lemma rename_id_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : rename id p = p := by
simp
theorem rename_monomial (f : σ → τ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
rename f (monomial d r) = monomial (d.mapDomain f) r := by
rw [rename, aeval_monomial, monomial_eq (s := Finsupp.mapDomain f d),
Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index]
· rfl
· exact fun n => pow_zero _
· exact fun n i₁ i₂ => pow_add _ _ _
theorem rename_eq (f : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename f p = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p := by
simp only [rename, aeval_def, eval₂, Finsupp.mapDomain, algebraMap_eq, comp_apply,
X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index]
rfl
theorem rename_injective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) := by
have :
(rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) :=
funext (rename_eq f)
rw [this]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_injective (Finsupp.mapDomain_injective hf)
theorem rename_leftInverse {f : σ → τ} {g : τ → σ} (hf : Function.LeftInverse f g) :
Function.LeftInverse (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) (rename g) := by
intro x
simp [hf.comp_eq_id]
theorem rename_rightInverse {f : σ → τ} {g : τ → σ} (hf : Function.RightInverse f g) :
Function.RightInverse (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) (rename g) :=
rename_leftInverse hf
theorem rename_surjective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) :=
let ⟨_, hf⟩ := hf.hasRightInverse; rename_rightInverse hf |>.surjective
section
variable {f : σ → τ} (hf : Function.Injective f)
open Classical in
/-- Given a function between sets of variables `f : σ → τ` that is injective with proof `hf`,
`MvPolynomial.killCompl hf` is the `AlgHom` from `R[τ]` to `R[σ]` that is left inverse to
`rename f : R[σ] → R[τ]` and sends the variables in the complement of the range of `f` to `0`. -/
def killCompl : MvPolynomial τ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval fun i => if h : i ∈ Set.range f then X <| (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
theorem killCompl_C (r : R) : killCompl hf (C r) = C r := algHom_C _ _
theorem killCompl_comp_rename : (killCompl hf).comp (rename f) = AlgHom.id R _ :=
algHom_ext fun i => by
dsimp
rw [rename, killCompl, aeval_X, comp_apply, aeval_X, dif_pos, Equiv.ofInjective_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem killCompl_rename_app (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : killCompl hf (rename f p) = p :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (killCompl_comp_rename hf) p
end
section
variable (R)
/-- `MvPolynomial.rename e` is an equivalence when `e` is. -/
@[simps apply]
def renameEquiv (f : σ ≃ τ) : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
{ rename f with
toFun := rename f
invFun := rename f.symm
left_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.symm_comp_self, rename_id_apply]
right_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.self_comp_symm, rename_id_apply] }
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_refl : renameEquiv R (Equiv.refl σ) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_symm (f : σ ≃ τ) : (renameEquiv R f).symm = renameEquiv R f.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_trans (e : σ ≃ τ) (f : τ ≃ α) :
(renameEquiv R e).trans (renameEquiv R f) = renameEquiv R (e.trans f) :=
AlgEquiv.ext (rename_rename e f)
end
section
variable (f : R →+* S) (k : σ → τ) (g : τ → S) (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
theorem eval₂_rename : (rename k p).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f (g ∘ k) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval_rename (g : τ → R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : eval g (rename k p) = eval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem eval₂Hom_rename : eval₂Hom f g (rename k p) = eval₂Hom f (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem aeval_rename [Algebra R S] : aeval g (rename k p) = aeval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂Hom_rename _ _ _ _
lemma aeval_comp_rename [Algebra R S] :
(aeval (R := R) g).comp (rename k) = MvPolynomial.aeval (g ∘ k) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ aeval_rename k g p
theorem rename_eval₂ (g : τ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename k (p.eval₂ C (g ∘ k)) = (rename k p).eval₂ C (rename k ∘ g) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem rename_prod_mk_eval₂ (j : τ) (g : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename (Prod.mk j) (p.eval₂ C g) = p.eval₂ C fun x => rename (Prod.mk j) (g x) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
| simp [*]
theorem eval₂_rename_prod_mk (g : σ × τ → S) (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial τ R) :
(rename (Prod.mk i) p).eval₂ f g = eval₂ f (fun j => g (i, j)) p := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Rename.lean | 213 | 217 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Acyclic graphs and trees
This module introduces *acyclic graphs* (a.k.a. *forests*) and *trees*.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.IsAcyclic` is a predicate for a graph having no cyclic walks.
* `SimpleGraph.IsTree` is a predicate for a graph being a tree (a connected acyclic graph).
## Main statements
* `SimpleGraph.isAcyclic_iff_path_unique` characterizes acyclicity in terms of uniqueness of
paths between pairs of vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.isAcyclic_iff_forall_edge_isBridge` characterizes acyclicity in terms of every
edge being a bridge edge.
* `SimpleGraph.isTree_iff_existsUnique_path` characterizes trees in terms of existence and
uniqueness of paths between pairs of vertices from a nonempty vertex type.
## References
The structure of the proofs for `SimpleGraph.IsAcyclic` and `SimpleGraph.IsTree`, including
supporting lemmas about `SimpleGraph.IsBridge`, generally follows the high-level description
for these theorems for multigraphs from [Chou1994].
## Tags
acyclic graphs, trees
-/
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
open Walk
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V)
/-- A graph is *acyclic* (or a *forest*) if it has no cycles. -/
def IsAcyclic : Prop := ∀ ⦃v : V⦄ (c : G.Walk v v), ¬c.IsCycle
/-- A *tree* is a connected acyclic graph. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsTree : Prop where
/-- Graph is connected. -/
protected isConnected : G.Connected
/-- Graph is acyclic. -/
protected IsAcyclic : G.IsAcyclic
variable {G}
@[simp] lemma isAcyclic_bot : IsAcyclic (⊥ : SimpleGraph V) := fun _a _w hw ↦ hw.ne_bot rfl
theorem isAcyclic_iff_forall_adj_isBridge :
G.IsAcyclic ↔ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, G.Adj v w → G.IsBridge s(v, w) := by
simp_rw [isBridge_iff_adj_and_forall_cycle_not_mem]
constructor
· intro ha v w hvw
apply And.intro hvw
intro u p hp
cases ha p hp
· rintro hb v (_ | ⟨ha, p⟩) hp
· exact hp.not_of_nil
· apply (hb ha).2 _ hp
rw [Walk.edges_cons]
apply List.mem_cons_self
theorem isAcyclic_iff_forall_edge_isBridge :
G.IsAcyclic ↔ ∀ ⦃e⦄, e ∈ (G.edgeSet) → G.IsBridge e := by
simp [isAcyclic_iff_forall_adj_isBridge, Sym2.forall]
theorem IsAcyclic.path_unique {G : SimpleGraph V} (h : G.IsAcyclic) {v w : V} (p q : G.Path v w) :
p = q := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := p
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := q
| rw [Subtype.mk.injEq]
induction p with
| nil =>
cases (Walk.isPath_iff_eq_nil _).mp hq
rfl
| cons ph p ih =>
rw [isAcyclic_iff_forall_adj_isBridge] at h
specialize h ph
rw [isBridge_iff_adj_and_forall_walk_mem_edges] at h
replace h := h.2 (q.append p.reverse)
simp only [Walk.edges_append, Walk.edges_reverse, List.mem_append, List.mem_reverse] at h
rcases h with h | h
· cases q with
| nil => simp [Walk.isPath_def] at hp
| cons _ q =>
rw [Walk.cons_isPath_iff] at hp hq
simp only [Walk.edges_cons, List.mem_cons, Sym2.eq_iff, true_and] at h
rcases h with (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩) | h
· cases ih hp.1 q hq.1
rfl
· simp at hq
· exact absurd (Walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges _ h) hq.2
· rw [Walk.cons_isPath_iff] at hp
exact absurd (Walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges _ h) hp.2
theorem isAcyclic_of_path_unique (h : ∀ (v w : V) (p q : G.Path v w), p = q) : G.IsAcyclic := by
intro v c hc
simp only [Walk.isCycle_def, Ne] at hc
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Acyclic.lean | 88 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Matroids
A `Matroid` is a structure that combinatorially abstracts
the notion of linear independence and dependence;
matroids have connections with graph theory, discrete optimization,
additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry.
Mathematically, a matroid `M` is a structure on a set `E` comprising a
collection of subsets of `E` called the bases of `M`,
where the bases are required to obey certain axioms.
This file gives a definition of a matroid `M` in terms of its bases,
and some API relating independent sets (subsets of bases) and the notion of a
basis of a set `X` (a maximal independent subset of `X`).
## Main definitions
* a `Matroid α` on a type `α` is a structure comprising a 'ground set'
and a suitably behaved 'base' predicate.
Given `M : Matroid α` ...
* `M.E` denotes the ground set of `M`, which has type `Set α`
* For `B : Set α`, `M.IsBase B` means that `B` is a base of `M`.
* For `I : Set α`, `M.Indep I` means that `I` is independent in `M`
(that is, `I` is contained in a base of `M`).
* For `D : Set α`, `M.Dep D` means that `D` is contained in the ground set of `M`
but isn't independent.
* For `I : Set α` and `X : Set α`, `M.IsBasis I X` means that `I` is a maximal independent
subset of `X`.
* `M.Finite` means that `M` has finite ground set.
* `M.Nonempty` means that the ground set of `M` is nonempty.
* `RankFinite M` means that the bases of `M` are finite.
* `RankInfinite M` means that the bases of `M` are infinite.
* `RankPos M` means that the bases of `M` are nonempty.
* `Finitary M` means that a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are
independent.
* `aesop_mat` : a tactic designed to prove `X ⊆ M.E` for some set `X` and matroid `M`.
## Implementation details
There are a few design decisions worth discussing.
### Finiteness
The first is that our matroids are allowed to be infinite.
Unlike with many mathematical structures, this isn't such an obvious choice.
Finite matroids have been studied since the 1930's,
and there was never controversy as to what is and isn't an example of a finite matroid -
in fact, surprisingly many apparently different definitions of a matroid
give rise to the same class of objects.
However, generalizing different definitions of a finite matroid
to the infinite in the obvious way (i.e. by simply allowing the ground set to be infinite)
gives a number of different notions of 'infinite matroid' that disagree with each other,
and that all lack nice properties.
Many different competing notions of infinite matroid were studied through the years;
in fact, the problem of which definition is the best was only really solved in 2013,
when Bruhn et al. [2] showed that there is a unique 'reasonable' notion of an infinite matroid
(these objects had previously defined by Higgs under the name 'B-matroid').
These are defined by adding one carefully chosen axiom to the standard set,
and adapting existing axioms to not mention set cardinalities;
they enjoy nearly all the nice properties of standard finite matroids.
Even though at least 90% of the literature is on finite matroids,
B-matroids are the definition we use, because they allow for additional generality,
nearly all theorems are still true and just as easy to state,
and (hopefully) the more general definition will prevent the need for a costly future refactor.
The disadvantage is that developing API for the finite case is harder work
(for instance, it is harder to prove that something is a matroid in the first place,
and one must deal with `ℕ∞` rather than `ℕ`).
For serious work on finite matroids, we provide the typeclasses
`[M.Finite]` and `[RankFinite M]` and associated API.
### Cardinality
Just as with bases of a vector space,
all bases of a finite matroid `M` are finite and have the same cardinality;
this cardinality is an important invariant known as the 'rank' of `M`.
For infinite matroids, bases are not in general equicardinal;
in fact the equicardinality of bases of infinite matroids is independent of ZFC [3].
What is still true is that either all bases are finite and equicardinal,
or all bases are infinite. This means that the natural notion of 'size'
for a set in matroid theory is given by the function `Set.encard`, which
is the cardinality as a term in `ℕ∞`. We use this function extensively
in building the API; it is preferable to both `Set.ncard` and `Finset.card`
because it allows infinite sets to be handled without splitting into cases.
### The ground `Set`
A last place where we make a consequential choice is making the ground set of a matroid
a structure field of type `Set α` (where `α` is the type of 'possible matroid elements')
rather than just having a type `α` of all the matroid elements.
This is because of how common it is to simultaneously consider
a number of matroids on different but related ground sets.
For example, a matroid `M` on ground set `E` can have its structure
'restricted' to some subset `R ⊆ E` to give a smaller matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`.
A statement like `(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂` is mathematically obvious.
But if the ground set of a matroid is a type, this doesn't typecheck,
and is only true up to canonical isomorphism.
Restriction is just the tip of the iceberg here;
one can also 'contract' and 'delete' elements and sets of elements
in a matroid to give a smaller matroid,
and in practice it is common to make statements like `M₁.E = M₂.E ∩ M₃.E` and
`((M ⟋ e) ↾ R) ⟋ C = M ⟋ (C ∪ {e}) ↾ R`.
Such things are a nightmare to work with unless `=` is actually propositional equality
(especially because the relevant coercions are usually between sets and not just elements).
So the solution is that the ground set `M.E` has type `Set α`,
and there are elements of type `α` that aren't in the matroid.
The tradeoff is that for many statements, one now has to add
hypotheses of the form `X ⊆ M.E` to make sure than `X` is actually 'in the matroid',
rather than letting a 'type of matroid elements' take care of this invisibly.
It still seems that this is worth it.
The tactic `aesop_mat` exists specifically to discharge such goals
with minimal fuss (using default values).
The tactic works fairly well, but has room for improvement.
A related decision is to not have matroids themselves be a typeclass.
This would make things be notationally simpler
(having `Base` in the presence of `[Matroid α]` rather than `M.Base` for a term `M : Matroid α`)
but is again just too awkward when one has multiple matroids on the same type.
In fact, in regular written mathematics,
it is normal to explicitly indicate which matroid something is happening in,
so our notation mirrors common practice.
### Notation
We use a few nonstandard conventions in theorem names that are related to the above.
First, we mirror common informal practice by referring explicitly to the `ground` set rather
than the notation `E`. (Writing `ground` everywhere in a proof term would be unwieldy, and
writing `E` in theorem names would be unnatural to read.)
Second, because we are typically interested in subsets of the ground set `M.E`,
using `Set.compl` is inconvenient, since `Xᶜ ⊆ M.E` is typically false for `X ⊆ M.E`.
On the other hand (especially when duals arise), it is common to complement
a set `X ⊆ M.E` *within* the ground set, giving `M.E \ X`.
For this reason, we use the term `compl` in theorem names to refer to taking a set difference
with respect to the ground set, rather than a complement within a type. The lemma
`compl_isBase_dual` is one of the many examples of this.
Finally, in theorem names, matroid predicates that apply to sets
(such as `Base`, `Indep`, `IsBasis`) are typically used as suffixes rather than prefixes.
For instance, we have `ground_indep_iff_isBase` rather than `indep_ground_iff_isBase`.
## References
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
* [H. Bruhn, R. Diestel, M. Kriesell, R. Pendavingh, P. Wollan, Axioms for infinite matroids,
Adv. Math 239 (2013), 18-46][bruhnDiestelKriesselPendavinghWollan2013]
* [N. Bowler, S. Geschke, Self-dual uniform matroids on infinite sets,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 459-471][bowlerGeschke2015]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
/-- A predicate `P` on sets satisfies the **exchange property** if,
for all `X` and `Y` satisfying `P` and all `a ∈ X \ Y`, there exists `b ∈ Y \ X` so that
swapping `a` for `b` in `X` maintains `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
/-- A set `X` has the maximal subset property for a predicate `P` if every subset of `X` satisfying
`P` is contained in a maximal subset of `X` satisfying `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → ∃ J, I ⊆ J ∧ Maximal (fun K ↦ P K ∧ K ⊆ X) J
/-- A `Matroid α` is a ground set `E` of type `Set α`, and a nonempty collection of its subsets
satisfying the exchange property and the maximal subset property. Each such set is called a
`Base` of `M`. An `Indep`endent set is just a set contained in a base, but we include this
predicate as a structure field for better definitional properties.
In most cases, using this definition directly is not the best way to construct a matroid,
since it requires specifying both the bases and independent sets. If the bases are known,
use `Matroid.ofBase` or a variant. If just the independent sets are known,
define an `IndepMatroid`, and then use `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
-/
structure Matroid (α : Type*) where
/-- `M` has a ground set `E`. -/
(E : Set α)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Base` defining its bases. -/
(IsBase : Set α → Prop)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Indep` defining its independent sets. -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
/-- The `Indep`endent sets are those contained in `Base`s. -/
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B)
/-- There is at least one `Base`. -/
(exists_isBase : ∃ B, IsBase B)
/-- For any bases `B`, `B'` and `e ∈ B \ B'`, there is some `f ∈ B' \ B` for which `B-e+f`
is a base. -/
(isBase_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty IsBase)
/-- Every independent subset `I` of a set `X` for is contained in a maximal independent
subset of `X`. -/
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
/-- Every base is contained in the ground set. -/
(subset_ground : ∀ B, IsBase B → B ⊆ E)
attribute [local ext] Matroid
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Base := IsBase
instance (M : Matroid α) : Nonempty {B // M.IsBase B} :=
nonempty_subtype.2 M.exists_isBase
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having finite ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Finite`. -/
@[mk_iff] protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is finite -/
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having nonempty ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Nonempty`. -/
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is nonempty -/
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
lemma nonempty_type (M : Matroid α) [h : M.Nonempty] : Nonempty α :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty.some⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
/-- A `RankFinite` matroid is one whose bases are finite -/
@[mk_iff] class RankFinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is a finite base -/
exists_finite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias FiniteRk := RankFinite
instance rankFinite_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : RankFinite M :=
⟨M.exists_isBase.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
/-- An `RankInfinite` matroid is one whose bases are infinite. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is an infinite base -/
exists_infinite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias InfiniteRk := RankInfinite
/-- A `RankPos` matroid is one whose bases are nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The empty set isn't a base -/
empty_not_isBase : ¬M.IsBase ∅
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias RkPos := RankPos
instance rankPos_nonempty {M : Matroid α} [M.RankPos] : M.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain rfl | ⟨e, heB⟩ := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact False.elim <| RankPos.empty_not_isBase hB
exact ⟨e, M.subset_ground B hB heB ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")] alias rkPos_iff_empty_not_base := rankPos_iff
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {IsBase : Set α → Prop} {B B' : Set α}
/-- A family of sets with the exchange property is an antichain. -/
theorem antichain (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB : IsBase B) (hB' : IsBase B') (h : B ⊆ B') :
B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
theorem encard_diff_le_aux {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
(exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
variable {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
/-- For any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property, the differences `B₁ \ B₂`
and `B₂ \ B₁` have the same `ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_diff_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
(encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB₂).antisymm (encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₂ hB₁)
/-- Any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property have the same
`ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_isBase_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter B₁ B₂, exch.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂, inter_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
end ExchangeProperty
end exchange
section aesop
/-- The `aesop_mat` tactic attempts to prove a set is contained in the ground set of a matroid.
It uses a `[Matroid]` ruleset, and is allowed to fail. -/
macro (name := aesop_mat) "aesop_mat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Matroid):ident]))
/- We add a number of trivial lemmas (deliberately specialized to statements in terms of the
ground set of a matroid) to the ruleset `Matroid` for `aesop`. -/
variable {X Y : Set α} {e : α}
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_right_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
X ∩ Y ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_left.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_left_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
Y ∩ X ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_right.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem diff_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : X \ Y ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_diff_subset_ground : M.E \ X ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset_ground rfl.subset
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem singleton_subset_ground (he : e ∈ M.E) : {e} ⊆ M.E :=
singleton_subset_iff.mpr he
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem subset_ground_of_subset (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hXY.trans hY
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem mem_ground_of_mem_of_subset (hX : X ⊆ M.E) (heX : e ∈ X) : e ∈ M.E :=
hX heX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem insert_subset_ground {e : α} {X : Set α} {M : Matroid α}
(he : e ∈ M.E) (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : insert e X ⊆ M.E :=
insert_subset he hX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_subset_ground {M : Matroid α} : M.E ⊆ M.E :=
rfl.subset
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])] empty_subset union_subset iUnion_subset
end aesop
section IsBase
variable {B B₁ B₂ : Set α}
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBase.subset_ground (hB : M.IsBase B) : B ⊆ M.E :=
M.subset_ground B hB
theorem IsBase.exchange {e : α} (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hx : e ∈ B₁ \ B₂) :
∃ y ∈ B₂ \ B₁, M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) :=
M.isBase_exchange B₁ B₂ hB₁ hB₂ _ hx
theorem IsBase.exchange_mem {e : α}
(hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hxB₁ : e ∈ B₁) (hxB₂ : e ∉ B₂) :
∃ y, (y ∈ B₂ ∧ y ∉ B₁) ∧ M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) := by
simpa using hB₁.exchange hB₂ ⟨hxB₁, hxB₂⟩
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hB₁B₂ : B₁ ⊆ B₂) :
B₁ = B₂ :=
M.isBase_exchange.antichain hB₁ hB₂ hB₁B₂
theorem IsBase.not_isBase_of_ssubset {X : Set α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (hX : X ⊂ B) : ¬ M.IsBase X :=
fun h ↦ hX.ne (h.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hX.subset)
theorem IsBase.insert_not_isBase {e : α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) :
¬ M.IsBase (insert e B) :=
fun h ↦ h.not_isBase_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) hB
theorem IsBase.encard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
M.isBase_exchange.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂
theorem IsBase.ncard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).ncard = (B₂ \ B₁).ncard := by
rw [ncard_def, hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [M.isBase_exchange.encard_isBase_eq hB₁ hB₂]
theorem IsBase.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.ncard = B₂.ncard := by
rw [ncard_def B₁, hB₁.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.finite_of_finite {B' : Set α}
(hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Finite) (hB' : M.IsBase B') : B'.Finite :=
(finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB')).mp h
theorem IsBase.infinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) :
B₁.Infinite :=
by_contra (fun hB_inf ↦ (hB₁.finite_of_finite (not_infinite.mp hB_inf) hB).not_infinite h)
theorem IsBase.finite [RankFinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Finite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankFinite M›.exists_finite_isBase
hB₀.1.finite_of_finite hB₀.2 hB
theorem IsBase.infinite [RankInfinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Infinite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankInfinite M›.exists_infinite_isBase
hB₀.1.infinite_of_infinite hB₀.2 hB
theorem empty_not_isBase [h : RankPos M] : ¬M.IsBase ∅ :=
h.empty_not_isBase
theorem IsBase.nonempty [RankPos M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact M.empty_not_isBase hB
theorem IsBase.rankPos_of_nonempty (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
rw [rankPos_iff]
intro he
obtain rfl := he.eq_of_subset_isBase hB (empty_subset B)
simp at h
theorem IsBase.rankFinite_of_finite (hB : M.IsBase B) (hfin : B.Finite) : RankFinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, hfin⟩⟩
theorem IsBase.rankInfinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) : RankInfinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, h⟩⟩
theorem not_rankFinite (M : Matroid α) [RankInfinite M] : ¬ RankFinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem not_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) [RankFinite M] : ¬ RankInfinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem rankFinite_or_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : RankFinite M ∨ RankInfinite M :=
let ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
B.finite_or_infinite.imp hB.rankFinite_of_finite hB.rankInfinite_of_infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-27")] alias finite_or_rankInfinite := rankFinite_or_rankInfinite
@[simp]
theorem not_rankFinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankFinite M ↔ RankInfinite M :=
M.rankFinite_or_rankInfinite.elim (fun h ↦ iff_of_false (by simpa) M.not_rankInfinite)
fun h ↦ iff_of_true M.not_rankFinite h
@[simp]
theorem not_rankInfinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankInfinite M ↔ RankFinite M := by
rw [← not_rankFinite_iff, not_not]
theorem IsBase.diff_finite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Finite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Finite :=
finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem IsBase.diff_infinite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Infinite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Infinite :=
infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem ext_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B)) : M₁ = M₂ := by
have h' : ∀ B, M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B :=
fun B ↦ ⟨fun hB ↦ (h hB.subset_ground).1 hB,
fun hB ↦ (h <| hB.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm).2 hB⟩
ext <;> simp [hE, M₁.indep_iff', M₂.indep_iff', h']
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_isBase_iff_isBase_forall := ext_isBase
theorem ext_iff_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ M₁.E = M₂.E ∧ ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simp [h], fun ⟨hE, h⟩ ↦ ext_isBase hE h⟩
theorem isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ↔ Maximal (fun I ↦ I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) B := by
simp_rw [maximal_iff, and_iff_right hB, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨_, h, disjoint_sdiff_right⟩,
fun I hI B' ⟨hB', hIB'⟩ hBI ↦ hBI.antisymm ?_⟩, fun ⟨⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩,h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [hB'.eq_of_subset_isBase h, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl] at hIB'
· exact fun e he ↦ (hIB' he).elim (fun h' ↦ (h' (hI he)).elim) id
rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right hB'.subset_ground, disjoint_comm]
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hBI hIB'
rw [h diff_subset B' ⟨hB', disjoint_sdiff_left⟩]
· simpa [hB'.subset_ground]
simp [subset_diff, hB, hBB']
end IsBase
section dep_indep
/-- A subset of `M.E` is `Dep`endent if it is not `Indep`endent . -/
def Dep (M : Matroid α) (D : Set α) : Prop := ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E
variable {B B' I J D X : Set α} {e f : α}
theorem indep_iff : M.Indep I ↔ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
M.indep_iff' (I := I)
theorem setOf_indep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {I | M.Indep I} = lowerClosure ({B | M.IsBase B}) := by
simp_rw [indep_iff, lowerClosure, LowerSet.coe_mk, mem_setOf, le_eq_subset]
theorem Indep.exists_isBase_superset (hI : M.Indep I) : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
indep_iff.1 hI
theorem dep_iff : M.Dep D ↔ ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E := Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_dep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {D | M.Dep D} = {I | M.Indep I}ᶜ ∩ Iic M.E := rfl
@[aesop unsafe 30% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Indep.subset_ground (hI : M.Indep I) : I ⊆ M.E := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hIB.trans hB.subset_ground
@[aesop unsafe 20% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Dep.subset_ground (hD : M.Dep D) : D ⊆ M.E :=
hD.2
theorem indep_or_dep (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep X ∨ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
apply em
theorem Indep.not_dep (hI : M.Indep I) : ¬ M.Dep I :=
fun h ↦ h.1 hI
theorem Dep.not_indep (hD : M.Dep D) : ¬ M.Indep D :=
hD.1
theorem dep_of_not_indep (hD : ¬ M.Indep D) (hDE : D ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep D :=
⟨hD, hDE⟩
theorem indep_of_not_dep (hI : ¬ M.Dep I) (hIE : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep I :=
by_contra (fun h ↦ hI ⟨h, hIE⟩)
@[simp] theorem not_dep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Dep X ↔ M.Indep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX, not_not]
@[simp] theorem not_indep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Indep X ↔ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
theorem indep_iff_not_dep : M.Indep I ↔ ¬M.Dep I ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
rw [dep_iff, not_and, not_imp_not]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ h, h.subset_ground⟩, fun h ↦ h.1 h.2⟩
theorem Indep.subset (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J) : M.Indep I := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hJB⟩ := hJ.exists_isBase_superset
exact indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, hIJ.trans hJB⟩
theorem Dep.superset (hD : M.Dep D) (hDX : D ⊆ X) (hXE : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep X :=
dep_of_not_indep (fun hI ↦ (hI.subset hDX).not_dep hD)
theorem IsBase.indep (hB : M.IsBase B) : M.Indep B :=
indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, subset_rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem empty_indep (M : Matroid α) : M.Indep ∅ :=
Exists.elim M.exists_isBase (fun _ hB ↦ hB.indep.subset (empty_subset _))
theorem Dep.nonempty (hD : M.Dep D) : D.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact hD.not_indep M.empty_indep
theorem Indep.finite [RankFinite M] (hI : M.Indep I) : I.Finite :=
let ⟨_, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hB.finite.subset hIB
theorem Indep.rankPos_of_nonempty (hI : M.Indep I) (hne : I.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hB.rankPos_of_nonempty (hne.mono hIB)
theorem Indep.inter_right (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I ∩ X) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_left
theorem Indep.inter_left (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (X ∩ I) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_right
theorem Indep.diff (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I \ X) :=
hI.subset diff_subset
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hI : M.Indep I) (hBI : B ⊆ I) : B = I :=
let ⟨B', hB', hB'I⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hBI.antisymm (by rwa [hB.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' (hBI.trans hB'I)])
theorem isBase_iff_maximal_indep : M.IsBase B ↔ Maximal M.Indep B := by
rw [maximal_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.indep, fun _ ↦ h.eq_of_subset_indep⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩ := h.exists_isBase_superset
rwa [h' hB'.indep hBB']
theorem Indep.isBase_of_maximal (hI : M.Indep I) (h : ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → I = J) :
M.IsBase I := by
rwa [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff, and_iff_right hI]
theorem IsBase.dep_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B ⊂ X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep X :=
⟨fun hX ↦ h.ne (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hX h.subset), hX⟩
theorem IsBase.dep_of_insert (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) (he : e ∈ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep (insert e B) := hB.dep_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) (insert_subset he hB.subset_ground)
theorem IsBase.mem_of_insert_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : M.Indep (insert e B)) : e ∈ B :=
by_contra fun he ↦ (hB.dep_of_insert he (heB.subset_ground (mem_insert _ _))).not_indep heB
/-- If the difference of two IsBases is a singleton, then they differ by an insertion/removal -/
theorem IsBase.eq_exchange_of_diff_eq_singleton (hB : M.IsBase B) (hB' : M.IsBase B')
(h : B \ B' = {e}) : ∃ f ∈ B' \ B, B' = (insert f B) \ {e} := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hb⟩ := hB.exchange hB' (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton e))
have hne : f ≠ e := by rintro rfl; exact hf.2 (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton f)).1
rw [insert_diff_singleton_comm hne] at hb
refine ⟨f, hf, (hb.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' ?_).symm⟩
rw [diff_subset_iff, insert_subset_iff, union_comm, ← diff_subset_iff, h, and_iff_left rfl.subset]
exact Or.inl hf.1
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f (B \ {e}))) : M.IsBase (insert f (B \ {e})) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
have hcard := hB'.encard_diff_comm hB
rw [insert_subset_iff, ← diff_eq_empty, diff_diff_comm, diff_eq_empty, subset_singleton_iff_eq]
at hIB'
obtain ⟨hfB, (h | h)⟩ := hIB'
· rw [h, encard_empty, encard_eq_zero, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] at hcard
exact (hcard f ⟨hfB, hf⟩).elim
rw [h, encard_singleton, encard_eq_one] at hcard
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hcard
obtain (rfl : f = x) := hx.subset ⟨hfB, hf⟩
simp_rw [← h, ← singleton_union, ← hx, sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_eq_inter, inter_comm B,
diff_union_inter]
exact hB'
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep' (hB : M.IsBase B) (he : e ∈ B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f B \ {e})) : M.IsBase (insert f B \ {e}) := by
have hfe : f ≠ e := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem he hf |>.symm
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm hfe] at *
exact hB.exchange_isBase_of_indep hf hI
lemma insert_isBase_of_insert_indep {M : Matroid α} {I : Set α} {e f : α}
(he : e ∉ I) (hf : f ∉ I) (heI : M.IsBase (insert e I)) (hfI : M.Indep (insert f I)) :
M.IsBase (insert f I) := by
obtain rfl | hef := eq_or_ne e f
· assumption
simpa [diff_singleton_eq_self he, hfI]
using heI.exchange_isBase_of_indep (e := e) (f := f) (by simp [hef.symm, hf])
theorem IsBase.insert_dep (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : e ∈ M.E \ B) : M.Dep (insert e B) := by
rw [← not_indep_iff (insert_subset h.1 hB.subset_ground)]
exact h.2 ∘ (fun hi ↦ insert_eq_self.mp (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hi (subset_insert e B)).symm)
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (hI : M.Indep I) (hI' : ¬M.IsBase I) (hB : M.IsBase B) :
∃ e ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
obtain ⟨x, hxB', hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (hIB'.ssubset_of_ne (by (rintro rfl; exact hI' hB')))
by_cases hxB : x ∈ B
· exact ⟨x, ⟨hxB, hx⟩, hB'.indep.subset (insert_subset hxB' hIB')⟩
obtain ⟨e,he, hBase⟩ := hB'.exchange hB ⟨hxB',hxB⟩
exact ⟨e, ⟨he.1, not_mem_subset hIB' he.2⟩,
indep_iff.2 ⟨_, hBase, insert_subset_insert (subset_diff_singleton hIB' hx)⟩⟩
/-- This is the same as `Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase`, but phrased so that
it is defeq to the augmentation axiom for independent sets. -/
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_maximal (M : Matroid α) ⦃I B : Set α⦄ (hI : M.Indep I)
(hInotmax : ¬ Maximal M.Indep I) (hB : Maximal M.Indep B) :
∃ x ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert x I) := by
simp only [maximal_subset_iff, hI, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, true_imp_iff] at hB hInotmax
refine hI.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (fun hIb ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hne⟩ := hInotmax
exact hne <| hIb.eq_of_subset_indep hII' hI'
exact hB.1.isBase_of_maximal fun J hJ hBJ ↦ hB.2 hJ hBJ
theorem Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (hB : M.Indep B)
(hBmax : ∀ e ∈ M.E \ B, ¬ M.Indep (insert e B)) : M.IsBase B := by
refine by_contra fun hnb ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨B', hB'⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨e, he, h⟩ := hB.exists_insert_of_not_isBase hnb hB'
exact hBmax e ⟨hB'.subset_ground he.1, he.2⟩ h
theorem ground_indep_iff_isBase : M.Indep M.E ↔ M.IsBase M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.isBase_of_maximal (fun _ hJ hEJ ↦ hEJ.antisymm hJ.subset_ground), IsBase.indep⟩
theorem IsBase.exists_insert_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (hIB : I ⊂ B) (hB' : M.IsBase B') :
∃ e ∈ B' \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) :=
(hB.indep.subset hIB.subset).exists_insert_of_not_isBase
(fun hI ↦ hIB.ne (hI.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hIB.subset)) hB'
@[ext] theorem ext_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I)) : M₁ = M₂ :=
have h' : M₁.Indep = M₂.Indep := by
ext I
by_cases hI : I ⊆ M₁.E
· rwa [h]
exact iff_of_false (fun hi ↦ hI hi.subset_ground)
(fun hi ↦ hI (hi.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm))
ext_isBase hE (fun B _ ↦ by simp_rw [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, h'])
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_indep
theorem ext_iff_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ (M₁.E = M₂.E) ∧ ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by (subst h; simp), fun h ↦ ext_indep h.1 h.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_iff_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_iff_indep
/-- If every base of `M₁` is independent in `M₂` and vice versa, then `M₁ = M₂`. -/
lemma ext_isBase_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(hM₁ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₁.IsBase B → M₂.Indep B) (hM₂ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₂.IsBase B → M₁.Indep B) : M₁ = M₂ := by
refine ext_indep hE fun I hIE ↦ ⟨fun hI ↦ ?_, fun hI ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₁ hB).subset hIB
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₂ hB).subset hIB
/-- A `Finitary` matroid is one where a set is independent if and only if it all
its finite subsets are independent, or equivalently a matroid whose circuits are finite. -/
@[mk_iff] class Finitary (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- `I` is independent if all its finite subsets are independent. -/
indep_of_forall_finite : ∀ I, (∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) → M.Indep I
theorem indep_of_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] (I : Set α)
(h : ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) : M.Indep I :=
Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I h
theorem indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] :
M.Indep I ↔ ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J :=
⟨fun h _ hJI _ ↦ h.subset hJI, Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I⟩
instance finitary_of_rankFinite {M : Matroid α} [RankFinite M] : Finitary M where
indep_of_forall_finite I hI := by
refine I.finite_or_infinite.elim (hI _ Subset.rfl) (fun h ↦ False.elim ?_)
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀I, hI₀fin, hI₀card⟩ := h.exists_subset_ncard_eq (B.ncard + 1)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hI₀B'⟩ := (hI _ hI₀I hI₀fin).exists_isBase_superset
have hle := ncard_le_ncard hI₀B' hB'.finite
rw [hI₀card, hB'.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase hB, Nat.add_one_le_iff] at hle
exact hle.ne rfl
/-- Matroids obey the maximality axiom -/
theorem existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (M : Matroid α) :
∀ X, X ⊆ M.E → ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty M.Indep X :=
M.maximality
end dep_indep
section copy
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with independence and base predicates and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps] def copy (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase Indep : Set α → Prop) (hE : E = M.E)
(hB : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) (hI : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α where
E := E
IsBase := IsBase
Indep := Indep
indep_iff' _ := by simp_rw [hI, hB, M.indep_iff]
exists_isBase := by
simp_rw [hB]
exact M.exists_isBase
isBase_exchange := by
simp_rw [show IsBase = M.IsBase from funext (by simp [hB])]
exact M.isBase_exchange
maximality := by
simp_rw [hE, show Indep = M.Indep from funext (by simp [hI])]
exact M.maximality
subset_ground := by
simp_rw [hE, hB]
exact M.subset_ground
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with an independence predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyIndep (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E M.IsBase Indep hE (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl) h
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with a base predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyBase (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E IsBase M.Indep hE h (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl)
end copy
section IsBasis
/-- A Basis for a set `X ⊆ M.E` is a maximal independent subset of `X`
(Often in the literature, the word 'Basis' is used to refer to what we call a 'Base'). -/
def IsBasis (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I ∧ X ⊆ M.E
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis := IsBasis
/-- `Matroid.IsBasis' I X` is the same as `Matroid.IsBasis I X`,
without the requirement that `X ⊆ M.E`. This is convenient for some
API building, especially when working with rank and closure. -/
def IsBasis' (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis' := IsBasis'
variable {B I J X Y : Set α} {e : α}
theorem IsBasis'.indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1
theorem IsBasis.indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1.1
theorem IsBasis.subset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : I ⊆ X :=
hI.1.1.2
theorem IsBasis.isBasis' (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.IsBasis' I X :=
hI.1
theorem IsBasis'.isBasis (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.IsBasis I X :=
⟨hI, hX⟩
theorem IsBasis'.subset (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : I ⊆ X :=
hI.1.2
@[aesop unsafe 15% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBasis.subset_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hI.2
theorem IsBasis.isBasis_inter_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) := by
convert hI
rw [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hI.subset_ground]
@[aesop unsafe 15% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBasis.left_subset_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : I ⊆ M.E :=
hI.indep.subset_ground
theorem IsBasis.eq_of_subset_indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J)
(hJX : J ⊆ X) : I = J :=
hIJ.antisymm (hI.1.2 ⟨hJ, hJX⟩ hIJ)
theorem IsBasis.Finite (hI : M.IsBasis I X) [RankFinite M] : I.Finite := hI.indep.finite
theorem isBasis_iff' :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ (M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ X ∧ ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → J ⊆ X → I = J) ∧ X ⊆ M.E := by
rw [IsBasis, maximal_subset_iff]
tauto
theorem isBasis_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ (M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ X ∧ ∀ J, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → J ⊆ X → I = J) := by
rw [isBasis_iff', and_iff_left hX]
theorem isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground : M.IsBasis' I X ↔ M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) := by
rw [IsBasis', IsBasis, and_iff_left inter_subset_right, maximal_iff_maximal_of_imp_of_forall]
· exact fun I hI ↦ ⟨hI.1, hI.2.trans inter_subset_left⟩
exact fun I hI ↦ ⟨I, rfl.le, hI.1, subset_inter hI.2 hI.1.subset_ground⟩
theorem isBasis'_iff_isBasis (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.IsBasis' I X ↔ M.IsBasis I X := by
rw [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hX]
theorem isBasis_iff_isBasis'_subset_ground : M.IsBasis I X ↔ M.IsBasis' I X ∧ X ⊆ M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.isBasis', h.subset_ground⟩, fun h ↦ (isBasis'_iff_isBasis h.2).mp h.1⟩
theorem IsBasis'.isBasis_inter_ground (hIX : M.IsBasis' I X) : M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) :=
isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground.mp hIX
theorem IsBasis'.eq_of_subset_indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J)
(hJX : J ⊆ X) : I = J :=
hIJ.antisymm (hI.2 ⟨hJ, hJX⟩ hIJ)
theorem IsBasis'.insert_not_indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (he : e ∈ X \ I) : ¬ M.Indep (insert e I) :=
fun hi ↦ he.2 <| insert_eq_self.1 <| Eq.symm <|
hI.eq_of_subset_indep hi (subset_insert _ _) (insert_subset he.1 hI.subset)
theorem isBasis_iff_maximal (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ Maximal (fun I ↦ M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ X) I := by
rw [IsBasis, and_iff_left hX]
theorem Indep.isBasis_of_maximal_subset (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X)
(hmax : ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → J ⊆ X → J ⊆ I) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis I X := by
rw [isBasis_iff (by aesop_mat : X ⊆ M.E), and_iff_right hI, and_iff_right hIX]
exact fun J hJ hIJ hJX ↦ hIJ.antisymm (hmax hJ hIJ hJX)
theorem IsBasis.isBasis_subset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hIY : I ⊆ Y) (hYX : Y ⊆ X) :
M.IsBasis I Y := by
rw [isBasis_iff (hYX.trans hI.subset_ground), and_iff_right hI.indep, and_iff_right hIY]
exact fun J hJ hIJ hJY ↦ hI.eq_of_subset_indep hJ hIJ (hJY.trans hYX)
@[simp] theorem isBasis_self_iff_indep : M.IsBasis I I ↔ M.Indep I := by
rw [isBasis_iff', and_iff_right rfl.subset, and_assoc, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun hi ↦ ⟨fun _ _ ↦ subset_antisymm, hi.subset_ground⟩
theorem Indep.isBasis_self (h : M.Indep I) : M.IsBasis I I :=
isBasis_self_iff_indep.mpr h
@[simp] theorem isBasis_empty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.IsBasis I ∅ ↔ I = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ subset_empty_iff.mp h.subset, fun h ↦ by (rw [h]; exact M.empty_indep.isBasis_self)⟩
theorem IsBasis.dep_of_ssubset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hIY : I ⊂ Y) (hYX : Y ⊆ X) : M.Dep Y := by
have : X ⊆ M.E := hI.subset_ground
rw [← not_indep_iff]
exact fun hY ↦ hIY.ne (hI.eq_of_subset_indep hY hIY.subset hYX)
theorem IsBasis.insert_dep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (he : e ∈ X \ I) : M.Dep (insert e I) :=
hI.dep_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert he.2) (insert_subset he.1 hI.subset)
theorem IsBasis.mem_of_insert_indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (he : e ∈ X) (hIe : M.Indep (insert e I)) :
e ∈ I :=
by_contra (fun heI ↦ (hI.insert_dep ⟨he, heI⟩).not_indep hIe)
theorem IsBasis'.mem_of_insert_indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (he : e ∈ X)
(hIe : M.Indep (insert e I)) : e ∈ I :=
hI.isBasis_inter_ground.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨he, hIe.subset_ground (mem_insert _ _)⟩ hIe
theorem IsBasis.not_isBasis_of_ssubset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hJI : J ⊂ I) : ¬ M.IsBasis J X :=
fun h ↦ hJI.ne (h.eq_of_subset_indep hI.indep hJI.subset hI.subset)
theorem Indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X)
(hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ∃ J, M.IsBasis J X ∧ I ⊆ J := by
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hJmax⟩ := M.maximality X hX I hI hIX
exact ⟨J, ⟨hJmax, hX⟩, hJ⟩
theorem Indep.subset_isBasis'_of_subset (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X) :
∃ J, M.IsBasis' J X ∧ I ⊆ J := by
simp_rw [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground]
exact hI.subset_isBasis_of_subset (subset_inter hIX hI.subset_ground)
theorem exists_isBasis (M : Matroid α) (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
∃ I, M.IsBasis I X :=
let ⟨_, hI, _⟩ := M.empty_indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (empty_subset X)
⟨_, hI⟩
theorem exists_isBasis' (M : Matroid α) (X : Set α) : ∃ I, M.IsBasis' I X :=
let ⟨_, hI, _⟩ := M.empty_indep.subset_isBasis'_of_subset (empty_subset X)
⟨_, hI⟩
theorem exists_isBasis_subset_isBasis (M : Matroid α) (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
∃ I J, M.IsBasis I X ∧ M.IsBasis J Y ∧ I ⊆ J := by
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis X (hXY.trans hY)
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (hI.subset.trans hXY)
exact ⟨_, _, hI, hJ, hIJ⟩
theorem IsBasis.exists_isBasis_inter_eq_of_superset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hXY : X ⊆ Y)
(hY : Y ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ∃ J, M.IsBasis J Y ∧ J ∩ X = I := by
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (hI.subset.trans hXY)
refine ⟨J, hJ, subset_antisymm ?_ (subset_inter hIJ hI.subset)⟩
exact fun e he ↦ hI.mem_of_insert_indep he.2 (hJ.indep.subset (insert_subset he.1 hIJ))
theorem exists_isBasis_union_inter_isBasis (M : Matroid α) (X Y : Set α)
(hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
∃ I, M.IsBasis I (X ∪ Y) ∧ M.IsBasis (I ∩ Y) Y :=
let ⟨J, hJ⟩ := M.exists_isBasis Y
(hJ.exists_isBasis_inter_eq_of_superset subset_union_right).imp
(fun I hI ↦ ⟨hI.1, by rwa [hI.2]⟩)
theorem Indep.eq_of_isBasis (hI : M.Indep I) (hJ : M.IsBasis J I) : J = I :=
hJ.eq_of_subset_indep hI hJ.subset rfl.subset
theorem IsBasis.exists_isBase (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I = B ∩ X :=
let ⟨B,hB, hIB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_isBase_superset
⟨B, hB, subset_antisymm (subset_inter hIB hI.subset)
(by rw [hI.eq_of_subset_indep (hB.indep.inter_right X) (subset_inter hIB hI.subset)
inter_subset_right])⟩
@[simp] theorem isBasis_ground_iff : M.IsBasis B M.E ↔ M.IsBase B := by
rw [IsBasis, and_iff_left rfl.subset, isBase_iff_maximal_indep,
maximal_and_iff_right_of_imp (fun _ h ↦ h.subset_ground),
and_iff_left_of_imp (fun h ↦ h.1.subset_ground)]
theorem IsBase.isBasis_ground (hB : M.IsBase B) : M.IsBasis B M.E :=
isBasis_ground_iff.mpr hB
theorem Indep.isBasis_iff_forall_insert_dep (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X) :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ ∀ e ∈ X \ I, M.Dep (insert e I) := by
rw [IsBasis, maximal_iff_forall_insert (fun I J hI hIJ ↦ ⟨hI.1.subset hIJ, hIJ.trans hI.2⟩)]
simp only [hI, hIX, and_self, insert_subset_iff, and_true, not_and, true_and, mem_diff, and_imp,
Dep, hI.subset_ground]
exact ⟨fun h e heX heI ↦ ⟨fun hi ↦ h.1 e heI hi heX, h.2 heX⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun e heI hi heX ↦ (h e heX heI).1 hi,
fun e heX ↦ (em (e ∈ I)).elim (fun h ↦ hI.subset_ground h) fun heI ↦ (h _ heX heI).2 ⟩⟩
theorem Indep.isBasis_of_forall_insert (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X)
(he : ∀ e ∈ X \ I, M.Dep (insert e I)) : M.IsBasis I X :=
(hI.isBasis_iff_forall_insert_dep hIX).mpr he
|
theorem Indep.isBasis_insert_iff (hI : M.Indep I) :
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 1,005 | 1,006 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Defs
/-!
# Theory of topological modules
We use the class `ContinuousSMul` for topological (semi) modules and topological vector spaces.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Filter Pointwise
universe u v w u'
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem ContinuousSMul.of_nhds_zero [IsTopologicalRing R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
(hmul : Tendsto (fun p : R × M => p.1 • p.2) (𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulleft : ∀ m : M, Tendsto (fun a : R => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulright : ∀ a : R, Tendsto (fun m : M => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)) : ContinuousSMul R M where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← nhds_prod_eq] at hmul
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂ (AddMonoidHom.smul : R →+ M →+ M) ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simpa [ContinuousAt]
variable (R M) in
omit [TopologicalSpace R] in
/-- A topological module over a ring has continuous negation.
This cannot be an instance, because it would cause search for `[Module ?R M]` with unknown `R`. -/
theorem ContinuousNeg.of_continuousConstSMul [ContinuousConstSMul R M] : ContinuousNeg M where
continuous_neg := by simpa using continuous_const_smul (T := M) (-1 : R)
end
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [ContinuousAdd M] [Module R M] [ContinuousSMul R M]
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior.
This is the case, e.g., if `R` is a nontrivially normed field. -/
theorem Submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [NeBot (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0)]
(s : Submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s : Set M)).Nonempty) : s = ⊤ := by
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine Submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 fun x => ?_
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy
have : Tendsto (fun c : R => y + c • x) (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0) (𝓝 (y + (0 : R) • x)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul tendsto_const_nhds)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this
obtain ⟨_, hu : y + _ • _ ∈ s, u, rfl⟩ :=
nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem (Filter.mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhdsWithin)
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_mem_nhds hy
rwa [s.add_mem_iff_right hy', ← Units.smul_def, s.smul_mem_iff' u] at hu
variable (R M)
/-- Let `R` be a topological ring such that zero is not an isolated point (e.g., a nontrivially
normed field, see `NormedField.punctured_nhds_neBot`). Let `M` be a nontrivial module over `R`
such that `c • x = 0` implies `c = 0 ∨ x = 0`. Then `M` has no isolated points. We formulate this
using `NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)`.
This lemma is not an instance because Lean would need to find `[ContinuousSMul ?m_1 M]` with
unknown `?m_1`. We register this as an instance for `R = ℝ` in `Real.punctured_nhds_module_neBot`.
One can also use `haveI := Module.punctured_nhds_neBot R M` in a proof.
-/
theorem Module.punctured_nhds_neBot [Nontrivial M] [NeBot (𝓝[≠] (0 : R))] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(x : M) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
rcases exists_ne (0 : M) with ⟨y, hy⟩
suffices Tendsto (fun c : R => x + c • y) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝[≠] x) from this.neBot
refine Tendsto.inf ?_ (tendsto_principal_principal.2 <| ?_)
· convert tendsto_const_nhds.add ((@tendsto_id R _).smul_const y)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero]
· intro c hc
simpa [hy] using hc
end
section LatticeOps
variable {R M₁ M₂ : Type*} [SMul R M₁] [SMul R M₂] [u : TopologicalSpace R]
{t : TopologicalSpace M₂} [ContinuousSMul R M₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M₁ M₂] [MulActionHomClass F R M₁ M₂] (f : F)
theorem continuousSMul_induced : @ContinuousSMul R M₁ _ u (t.induced f) :=
let _ : TopologicalSpace M₁ := t.induced f
IsInducing.continuousSMul ⟨rfl⟩ continuous_id (map_smul f _ _)
end LatticeOps
/-- The span of a separable subset with respect to a separable scalar ring is again separable. -/
lemma TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.span {R M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring R] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace R] [SeparableSpace R]
[ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousSMul R M] {s : Set M} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
IsSeparable (Submodule.span R s : Set M) := by
rw [Submodule.span_eq_iUnion_nat]
refine .iUnion fun n ↦ .image ?_ ?_
· have : IsSeparable {f : Fin n → R × M | ∀ (i : Fin n), f i ∈ Set.univ ×ˢ s} := by
apply isSeparable_pi (fun i ↦ .prod (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hs)
rwa [Set.univ_prod] at this
· apply continuous_finset_sum _ (fun i _ ↦ ?_)
exact (continuous_fst.comp (continuous_apply i)).smul (continuous_snd.comp (continuous_apply i))
namespace Submodule
instance topologicalAddGroup {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] (S : Submodule R M) : IsTopologicalAddGroup S :=
inferInstanceAs (IsTopologicalAddGroup S.toAddSubgroup)
end Submodule
section closure
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[ContinuousConstSMul R M]
theorem Submodule.mapsTo_smul_closure (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (closure s : Set M) (closure s) :=
have : Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (s : Set M) s := fun _ h ↦ s.smul_mem c h
this.closure (continuous_const_smul c)
theorem Submodule.smul_closure_subset (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
c • closure (s : Set M) ⊆ closure (s : Set M) :=
(s.mapsTo_smul_closure c).image_subset
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a submodule of a topological `R`-module `M` is itself
a submodule. -/
def Submodule.topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M :=
{ s.toAddSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
smul_mem' := s.mapsTo_smul_closure }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe (s : Submodule R M) :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set M) = closure (s : Set M) :=
rfl
theorem Submodule.le_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
subset_closure
theorem Submodule.closure_subset_topologicalClosure_span (s : Set M) :
closure s ⊆ (span R s).topologicalClosure := by
rw [Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe]
exact closure_mono subset_span
theorem Submodule.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set M) := isClosed_closure
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Submodule R M) {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set M)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono {s : Submodule R M} {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t) :
s.topologicalClosure ≤ t.topologicalClosure :=
closure_mono h
/-- The topological closure of a closed submodule `s` is equal to `s`. -/
theorem IsClosed.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq {s : Submodule R M} (hs : IsClosed (s : Set M)) :
s.topologicalClosure = s :=
SetLike.ext' hs.closure_eq
/-- A subspace is dense iff its topological closure is the entire space. -/
theorem Submodule.dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top {s : Submodule R M} :
Dense (s : Set M) ↔ s.topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq, dense_iff_closure_eq]
simp
instance Submodule.topologicalClosure.completeSpace {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
[UniformSpace M'] [ContinuousAdd M'] [ContinuousConstSMul R M'] [CompleteSpace M']
(U : Submodule R M') : CompleteSpace U.topologicalClosure :=
isClosed_closure.completeSpace_coe
/-- A maximal proper subspace of a topological module (i.e a `Submodule` satisfying `IsCoatom`)
is either closed or dense. -/
theorem Submodule.isClosed_or_dense_of_isCoatom (s : Submodule R M) (hs : IsCoatom s) :
IsClosed (s : Set M) ∨ Dense (s : Set M) := by
refine (hs.le_iff.mp s.le_topologicalClosure).symm.imp ?_ dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top.mpr
exact fun h ↦ h ▸ isClosed_closure
end closure
namespace Submodule
variable {ι R : Type*} {M : ι → Type*} [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well. -/
theorem closure_coe_iSup_map_single (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
closure (↑(⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) : Set (∀ i, M i)) =
Set.univ.pi fun i ↦ closure (s i) := by
rw [← closure_pi_set]
refine (closure_mono ?_).antisymm <| closure_minimal ?_ isClosed_closure
· exact SetLike.coe_mono <| iSup_map_single_le
· simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_closure_iff]
intro x hx U hU hxU
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.mp hU x hxU with ⟨t, V, hV, hVU⟩
refine ⟨∑ i ∈ t, Pi.single i (x i), hVU ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_all [Finset.sum_pi_single]
· exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| mem_map_of_mem <| hx _ <| Set.mem_univ _
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well.
This version is stated in terms of `Submodule.topologicalClosure`,
thus assumes that `M i`s are topological modules over `R`.
However, the statement is true without assuming continuity of the operations,
see `Submodule.closure_coe_iSup_map_single` above. -/
theorem topologicalClosure_iSup_map_single [∀ i, ContinuousAdd (M i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousConstSMul R (M i)] (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
topologicalClosure (⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) =
pi Set.univ fun i ↦ (s i).topologicalClosure :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| closure_coe_iSup_map_single _
end Submodule
section Pi
theorem LinearMap.continuous_on_pi {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Finite ι] [Semiring R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousAdd M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) : Continuous f := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
-- for the proof, write `f` in the standard basis, and use that each coordinate is a continuous
-- function.
have : (f : (ι → R) → M) = fun x => ∑ i : ι, x i • f fun j => if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
ext x
exact f.pi_apply_eq_sum_univ x
rw [this]
refine continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
exact (continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const
end Pi
section PointwiseLimits
variable {M₁ M₂ α R S : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M₂] [T2Space M₂] [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module S M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul S M₂]
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂] {σ : R →+* S} {l : Filter α}
/-- Constructs a bundled linear map from a function and a proof that this function belongs to the
closure of the set of linear maps. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe (f : M₁ → M₂)
(hf : f ∈ closure (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂))) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
{ addMonoidHomOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf with
map_smul' := (isClosed_setOf_map_smul M₁ M₂ σ).closure_subset_iff.2
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ) hf }
/-- Construct a bundled linear map from a pointwise limit of linear maps -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfTendsto (f : M₁ → M₂) (g : α → M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) [l.NeBot]
(h : Tendsto (fun a x => g a x) l (𝓝 f)) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f <|
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_range_self _
variable (M₁ M₂ σ)
theorem LinearMap.isClosed_range_coe : IsClosed (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂)) :=
isClosed_of_closure_subset fun f hf => ⟨linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf, rfl⟩
end PointwiseLimits
section Quotient
namespace Submodule
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M]
(S : Submodule R M)
instance _root_.QuotientModule.Quotient.topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.quotientRel))
theorem isOpenMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenMap_coe
theorem isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenQuotientMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk
instance topologicalAddGroup_quotient [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] : IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S.toAddSubgroup)
instance continuousSMul_quotient [TopologicalSpace R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] : ContinuousSMul R (M ⧸ S) where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← (IsOpenQuotientMap.id.prodMap S.isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ).continuous_comp_iff]
exact continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_smul
instance t3_quotient_of_isClosed [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] [IsClosed (S : Set M)] :
T3Space (M ⧸ S) :=
letI : IsClosed (S.toAddSubgroup : Set M) := ‹_›
QuotientAddGroup.instT3Space S.toAddSubgroup
end Submodule
end Quotient
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Basic.lean | 770 | 771 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.QuadraticReciprocity
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Basic
/-!
# Sums of two squares
Fermat's theorem on the sum of two squares. Every prime `p` congruent to 1 mod 4 is the
sum of two squares; see `Nat.Prime.sq_add_sq` (which has the weaker assumption `p % 4 ≠ 3`).
We also give the result that characterizes the (positive) natural numbers that are sums
of two squares as those numbers `n` such that for every prime `q` congruent to 3 mod 4, the
exponent of the largest power of `q` dividing `n` is even; see `Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_iff`.
There is an alternative characterization as the numbers of the form `a^2 * b`, where `b` is a
natural number such that `-1` is a square modulo `b`; see `Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_iff_eq_sq_mul`.
-/
section Fermat
open GaussianInt
/-- **Fermat's theorem on the sum of two squares**. Every prime not congruent to 3 mod 4 is the sum
of two squares. Also known as **Fermat's Christmas theorem**. -/
theorem Nat.Prime.sq_add_sq {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hp : p % 4 ≠ 3) :
∃ a b : ℕ, a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 = p := by
apply sq_add_sq_of_nat_prime_of_not_irreducible p
rwa [_root_.irreducible_iff_prime, prime_iff_mod_four_eq_three_of_nat_prime p]
end Fermat
/-!
### Generalities on sums of two squares
-/
section General
/-- The set of sums of two squares is closed under multiplication in any commutative ring.
See also `sq_add_sq_mul_sq_add_sq`. -/
theorem sq_add_sq_mul {R} [CommRing R] {a b x y u v : R} (ha : a = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2)
(hb : b = u ^ 2 + v ^ 2) : ∃ r s : R, a * b = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2 :=
⟨x * u - y * v, x * v + y * u, by rw [ha, hb]; ring⟩
/-- The set of natural numbers that are sums of two squares is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem Nat.sq_add_sq_mul {a b x y u v : ℕ} (ha : a = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2) (hb : b = u ^ 2 + v ^ 2) :
∃ r s : ℕ, a * b = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2 := by
zify at ha hb ⊢
obtain ⟨r, s, h⟩ := _root_.sq_add_sq_mul ha hb
refine ⟨r.natAbs, s.natAbs, ?_⟩
simpa only [Int.natCast_natAbs, sq_abs]
end General
/-!
### Results on when -1 is a square modulo a natural number
-/
section NegOneSquare
-- This could be formulated for a general integer `a` in place of `-1`,
-- but it would not directly specialize to `-1`,
-- because `((-1 : ℤ) : ZMod n)` is not the same as `(-1 : ZMod n)`.
/-- If `-1` is a square modulo `n` and `m` divides `n`, then `-1` is also a square modulo `m`. -/
theorem ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_dvd {m n : ℕ} (hd : m ∣ n) (hs : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n)) :
IsSquare (-1 : ZMod m) := by
let f : ZMod n →+* ZMod m := ZMod.castHom hd _
rw [← RingHom.map_one f, ← RingHom.map_neg]
exact hs.map f
/-- If `-1` is a square modulo coprime natural numbers `m` and `n`, then `-1` is also
a square modulo `m*n`. -/
theorem ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_mul {m n : ℕ} (hc : m.Coprime n) (hm : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod m))
(hn : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n)) : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod (m * n)) := by
have : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod m × ZMod n) := by
rw [show (-1 : ZMod m × ZMod n) = ((-1 : ZMod m), (-1 : ZMod n)) from rfl]
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hm
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hn
rw [hx, hy]
exact ⟨(x, y), rfl⟩
simpa only [RingEquiv.map_neg_one] using this.map (ZMod.chineseRemainder hc).symm
/-- If a prime `p` divides `n` such that `-1` is a square modulo `n`, then `p % 4 ≠ 3`. -/
theorem Nat.Prime.mod_four_ne_three_of_dvd_isSquare_neg_one {p n : ℕ} (hpp : p.Prime) (hp : p ∣ n)
(hs : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n)) : p % 4 ≠ 3 := by
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_dvd hp hs
rw [← sq, eq_comm, show (-1 : ZMod p) = -1 ^ 2 by ring] at h
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨hpp⟩
exact ZMod.mod_four_ne_three_of_sq_eq_neg_sq' one_ne_zero h
/-- If `n` is a squarefree natural number, then `-1` is a square modulo `n` if and only if
`n` is not divisible by a prime `q` such that `q % 4 = 3`. -/
theorem ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n) ↔ ∀ {q : ℕ}, q.Prime → q ∣ n → q % 4 ≠ 3 := by
refine ⟨fun H q hqp hqd => hqp.mod_four_ne_three_of_dvd_isSquare_neg_one hqd H, fun H => ?_⟩
induction n using induction_on_primes with
| h₀ => exact False.elim (hn.ne_zero rfl)
| h₁ => exact ⟨0, by simp only [mul_zero, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]⟩
| h p n hpp ih =>
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨hpp⟩
have hcp : p.Coprime n := by
by_contra hc
exact hpp.not_isUnit (hn p <| mul_dvd_mul_left p <| hpp.dvd_iff_not_coprime.mpr hc)
have hp₁ := ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff.mpr (H hpp (dvd_mul_right p n))
exact ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_mul hcp hp₁
(ih hn.of_mul_right fun hqp hqd => H hqp <| dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hqd _)
/-- If `n` is a squarefree natural number, then `-1` is a square modulo `n` if and only if
`n` has no divisor `q` that is `≡ 3 mod 4`. -/
theorem ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_iff' {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n) ↔ ∀ {q : ℕ}, q ∣ n → q % 4 ≠ 3 := by
have help : ∀ a b : ZMod 4, a ≠ 3 → b ≠ 3 → a * b ≠ 3 := by decide
rw [ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_iff hn]
refine ⟨?_, fun H q _ => H⟩
intro H
refine @induction_on_primes _ ?_ ?_ (fun p q hp hq hpq => ?_)
· exact fun _ => by norm_num
· exact fun _ => by norm_num
· replace hp := H hp (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd hpq)
replace hq := hq (dvd_of_mul_left_dvd hpq)
rw [show 3 = 3 % 4 by norm_num, Ne, ← ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff'] at hp hq ⊢
rw [Nat.cast_mul]
exact help p q hp hq
/-!
### Relation to sums of two squares
-/
/-- If `-1` is a square modulo the natural number `n`, then `n` is a sum of two squares. -/
theorem Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_of_isSquare_mod_neg_one {n : ℕ} (h : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n)) :
∃ x y : ℕ, n = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 := by
induction n using induction_on_primes with
| h₀ => exact ⟨0, 0, rfl⟩
| h₁ => exact ⟨0, 1, rfl⟩
| h p n hpp ih =>
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨hpp⟩
have hp : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod p) := ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_dvd ⟨n, rfl⟩ h
obtain ⟨u, v, huv⟩ := Nat.Prime.sq_add_sq (ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff.mp hp)
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := ih (ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_dvd ⟨p, mul_comm _ _⟩ h)
exact Nat.sq_add_sq_mul huv.symm hxy
/-- If the integer `n` is a sum of two squares of coprime integers,
then `-1` is a square modulo `n`. -/
theorem ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_eq_sq_add_sq_of_isCoprime {n x y : ℤ} (h : n = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2)
(hc : IsCoprime x y) : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n.natAbs) := by
obtain ⟨u, v, huv⟩ : IsCoprime x n := by
have hc2 : IsCoprime (x ^ 2) (y ^ 2) := hc.pow
rw [show y ^ 2 = n + -1 * x ^ 2 by omega] at hc2
exact (IsCoprime.pow_left_iff zero_lt_two).mp hc2.of_add_mul_right_right
have H : u * y * (u * y) - -1 = n * (-v ^ 2 * n + u ^ 2 + 2 * v) := by
linear_combination -u ^ 2 * h + (n * v - u * x - 1) * huv
refine ⟨u * y, ?_⟩
conv_rhs => tactic => norm_cast
rw [(by norm_cast : (-1 : ZMod n.natAbs) = (-1 : ℤ))]
exact (ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub _ _ _).mpr (Int.natAbs_dvd.mpr ⟨_, H⟩)
/-- If the natural number `n` is a sum of two squares of coprime natural numbers, then
`-1` is a square modulo `n`. -/
theorem ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_eq_sq_add_sq_of_coprime {n x y : ℕ} (h : n = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2)
(hc : x.Coprime y) : IsSquare (-1 : ZMod n) := by
zify at h
exact ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_eq_sq_add_sq_of_isCoprime h hc.isCoprime
/-- A natural number `n` is a sum of two squares if and only if `n = a^2 * b` with natural
numbers `a` and `b` such that `-1` is a square modulo `b`. -/
theorem Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_iff_eq_sq_mul {n : ℕ} :
(∃ x y : ℕ, n = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2) ↔ ∃ a b : ℕ, n = a ^ 2 * b ∧ IsSquare (-1 : ZMod b) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
by_cases hxy : x = 0 ∧ y = 0
· exact ⟨0, 1, by rw [h, hxy.1, hxy.2, zero_pow two_ne_zero, add_zero, zero_mul],
⟨0, by rw [zero_mul, neg_eq_zero, Fin.one_eq_zero_iff]⟩⟩
· have hg := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (mt Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff.mp hxy)
obtain ⟨g, x₁, y₁, _, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := Nat.exists_coprime' hg
exact ⟨g, x₁ ^ 2 + y₁ ^ 2, by rw [h, h₃, h₄]; ring,
ZMod.isSquare_neg_one_of_eq_sq_add_sq_of_coprime rfl h₂⟩
| · rintro ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨x', y', h⟩ := Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_of_isSquare_mod_neg_one h₂
exact ⟨a * x', a * y', by rw [h₁, h]; ring⟩
end NegOneSquare
/-!
### Characterization in terms of the prime factorization
-/
section Main
/-- A (positive) natural number `n` is a sum of two squares if and only if the exponent of
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SumTwoSquares.lean | 185 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
| @[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 650 | 651 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
| simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 925 | 930 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
| exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 763 | 772 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Equitable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Finite equipartitions
This file defines finite equipartitions, the partitions whose parts all are the same size up to a
difference of `1`.
## Main declarations
* `Finpartition.IsEquipartition`: Predicate for a `Finpartition` to be an equipartition.
* `Finpartition.IsEquipartition.exists_partPreservingEquiv`: part-preserving enumeration of a finset
equipped with an equipartition. Indices of elements in the same part are congruent modulo
the number of parts.
-/
open Finset Fintype
namespace Finpartition
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} (P : Finpartition s)
/-- An equipartition is a partition whose parts are all the same size, up to a difference of `1`. -/
def IsEquipartition : Prop :=
(P.parts : Set (Finset α)).EquitableOn card
theorem isEquipartition_iff_card_parts_eq_average :
P.IsEquipartition ↔
∀ a : Finset α, a ∈ P.parts → #a = #s / #P.parts ∨ #a = #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
simp_rw [IsEquipartition, Finset.equitableOn_iff, P.sum_card_parts]
variable {P}
lemma not_isEquipartition :
¬P.IsEquipartition ↔ ∃ a ∈ P.parts, ∃ b ∈ P.parts, #b + 1 < #a := Set.not_equitableOn
theorem _root_.Set.Subsingleton.isEquipartition (h : (P.parts : Set (Finset α)).Subsingleton) :
P.IsEquipartition :=
Set.Subsingleton.equitableOn h _
theorem IsEquipartition.card_parts_eq_average (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t = #s / #P.parts ∨ #t = #s / #P.parts + 1 :=
P.isEquipartition_iff_card_parts_eq_average.1 hP _ ht
theorem IsEquipartition.card_part_eq_average_iff (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#t = #s / #P.parts ↔ #t ≠ #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
have a := hP.card_parts_eq_average ht
have b : ¬(#t = #s / #P.parts ∧ #t = #s / #P.parts + 1) := by
by_contra h; exact absurd (h.1 ▸ h.2) (lt_add_one _).ne
tauto
theorem IsEquipartition.average_le_card_part (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
#s / #P.parts ≤ #t := by
rw [← P.sum_card_parts]
exact Finset.EquitableOn.le hP ht
theorem IsEquipartition.card_part_le_average_add_one (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (ht : t ∈ P.parts) :
| #t ≤ #s / #P.parts + 1 := by
rw [← P.sum_card_parts]
exact Finset.EquitableOn.le_add_one hP ht
| Mathlib/Order/Partition/Equipartition.lean | 68 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Bounds
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
/-!
# The real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring, and a conditionally complete linear order.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Pointwise CauSeq
namespace Real
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ} {a : ℝ}
instance instArchimedean : Archimedean ℝ :=
archimedean_iff_rat_le.2 fun x =>
Real.ind_mk x fun f =>
let ⟨M, _, H⟩ := f.bounded' 0
⟨M, mk_le_of_forall_le ⟨0, fun i _ => Rat.cast_le.2 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H i)).2⟩⟩
noncomputable instance : FloorRing ℝ :=
Archimedean.floorRing _
theorem isCauSeq_iff_lift {f : ℕ → ℚ} : IsCauSeq abs f ↔ IsCauSeq abs fun i => (f i : ℝ) where
mp H ε ε0 :=
let ⟨δ, δ0, δε⟩ := exists_pos_rat_lt ε0
(H _ δ0).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp; exact lt_trans (mod_cast hi _ ij) δε
mpr H ε ε0 :=
(H _ (Rat.cast_pos.2 ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp at hi; exact mod_cast hi _ ij
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → ℚ) (x : ℝ) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| < ε) :
∃ h', Real.mk ⟨f, h'⟩ = x :=
⟨isCauSeq_iff_lift.2 (CauSeq.of_near _ (const abs x) h),
sub_eq_zero.1 <|
abs_eq_zero.1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abs_nonneg _)) fun _ε ε0 =>
mk_near_of_forall_near <| (h _ ε0).imp fun _i h j ij => le_of_lt (h j ij)⟩
theorem exists_floor (x : ℝ) : ∃ ub : ℤ, (ub : ℝ) ≤ x ∧ ∀ z : ℤ, (z : ℝ) ≤ x → z ≤ ub :=
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_gt x
⟨n, fun _ h' => Int.cast_le.1 <| le_trans h' <| le_of_lt hn⟩)
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_lt x
⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩)
theorem exists_isLUB (hne : s.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddAbove s) : ∃ x, IsLUB s x := by
rcases hne, hbdd with ⟨⟨L, hL⟩, ⟨U, hU⟩⟩
have : ∀ d : ℕ, BddAbove { m : ℤ | ∃ y ∈ s, (m : ℝ) ≤ y * d } := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_int_gt U
refine fun d => ⟨k * d, fun z h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine Int.cast_le.1 (hy.trans ?_)
push_cast
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((hU yS).trans hk.le) d.cast_nonneg
choose f hf using fun d : ℕ =>
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd (this d) ⟨⌊L * d⌋, L, hL, Int.floor_le _⟩
have hf₁ : ∀ n > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, ((f n / n : ℚ) : ℝ) ≤ y := fun n n0 =>
let ⟨y, yS, hy⟩ := (hf n).1
⟨y, yS, by simpa using (div_le_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _)).2 hy⟩
have hf₂ : ∀ n > 0, ∀ y ∈ s, (y - ((n : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) < (f n / n : ℚ) := by
intro n n0 y yS
have := (Int.sub_one_lt_floor _).trans_le (Int.cast_le.2 <| (hf n).2 _ ⟨y, yS, Int.floor_le _⟩)
simp only [Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_intCast, Rat.cast_natCast, gt_iff_lt]
rwa [lt_div_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _), sub_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀]
exact ne_of_gt (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0)
have hg : IsCauSeq abs (fun n => f n / n : ℕ → ℚ) := by
intro ε ε0
suffices ∀ j ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, ∀ k ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, (f j / j - f k / k : ℚ) < ε by
refine ⟨_, fun j ij => abs_lt.2 ⟨?_, this _ ij _ le_rfl⟩⟩
rw [neg_lt, neg_sub]
exact this _ le_rfl _ ij
intro j ij k ik
replace ij := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ij)
replace ik := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ik)
have j0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ij)
have k0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ik)
rcases hf₁ _ j0 with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((Rat.cast_lt (K := ℝ)).1 ?_) ((inv_le_comm₀ ε0 (Nat.cast_pos.2 k0)).1 ik)
simpa using sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt hy <| sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1 <| hf₂ _ k0 _ yS)
let g : CauSeq ℚ abs := ⟨fun n => f n / n, hg⟩
refine ⟨mk g, ⟨fun x xS => ?_, fun y h => ?_⟩⟩
· refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun z xz => ?_
obtain ⟨K, hK⟩ := exists_nat_gt (x - z)⁻¹
refine le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨K, fun n nK => ?_⟩
replace xz := sub_pos.2 xz
replace hK := hK.le.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 nK)
have n0 : 0 < n := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 xz).trans_le hK)
refine le_trans ?_ (hf₂ _ n0 _ xS).le
rwa [le_sub_comm, inv_le_comm₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _) xz]
· exact
mk_le_of_forall_le
⟨1, fun n n1 =>
let ⟨x, xS, hx⟩ := hf₁ _ n1
le_trans hx (h xS)⟩
/-- A nonempty, bounded below set of real numbers has a greatest lower bound. -/
theorem exists_isGLB (hne : s.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddBelow s) : ∃ x, IsGLB s x := by
have hne' : (-s).Nonempty := Set.nonempty_neg.mpr hne
have hbdd' : BddAbove (-s) := bddAbove_neg.mpr hbdd
use -Classical.choose (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
rw [← isLUB_neg]
exact Classical.choose_spec (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℝ :=
⟨fun s => if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
theorem sSup_def (s : Set ℝ) :
sSup s = if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem isLUB_sSup (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
simp only [sSup_def, dif_pos (And.intro h₁ h₂)]
apply Classical.choose_spec
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℝ :=
⟨fun s => -sSup (-s)⟩
theorem sInf_def (s : Set ℝ) : sInf s = -sSup (-s) := rfl
protected theorem isGLB_sInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_def, ← isLUB_neg', neg_neg]
exact Real.isLUB_sSup h₁.neg h₂.neg
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder ℝ where
__ := Real.linearOrder
__ := Real.lattice
le_csSup s a hs ha := (Real.isLUB_sSup ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
csSup_le s a hs ha := (Real.isLUB_sSup hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csInf_le s a hs ha := (Real.isGLB_sInf ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
le_csInf s a hs ha := (Real.isGLB_sInf hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs := by simp [hs, sSup_def]
csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs := by simp [hs, sInf_def, sSup_def]
theorem lt_sInf_add_pos (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < sInf s + ε :=
exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
theorem add_neg_lt_sSup (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε < 0) : ∃ a ∈ s, sSup s + ε < a :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h <| add_lt_iff_neg_left.2 hε
theorem sInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (h' : s.Nonempty) :
sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x ∈ s, x < a + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
constructor <;> intro H ε ε_pos
· exact exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h' (H ε ε_pos)
· rcases H ε ε_pos with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact csInf_lt_of_lt h x_in hx
theorem le_sSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (h' : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ ε, ε < 0 → ∃ x ∈ s, a + ε < x := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
refine ⟨fun H ε ε_neg => ?_, fun H ε ε_pos => ?_⟩
· exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h' (lt_sub_iff_add_lt.mp (H _ (neg_pos.mpr ε_neg)))
· rcases H _ (neg_lt_zero.mpr ε_pos) with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add.mp (lt_csSup_of_lt h x_in hx)
@[simp]
theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set ℝ) = 0 :=
dif_neg <| by simp
@[simp] lemma iSup_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) : ⨆ i, f i = 0 := by
dsimp [iSup]
convert Real.sSup_empty
rw [Set.range_eq_empty_iff]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem iSup_const_zero : ⨆ _ : ι, (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· exact Real.iSup_of_isEmpty _
· exact ciSup_const
lemma sSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = 0 := dif_neg fun h => hs h.2
lemma iSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (Set.range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = 0 := sSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
theorem sSup_univ : sSup (@Set.univ ℝ) = 0 := Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove not_bddAbove_univ
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [sInf_def, sSup_empty]
@[simp] nonrec lemma iInf_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) : ⨅ i, f i = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_const_zero : ⨅ _ : ι, (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· exact Real.iInf_of_isEmpty _
· exact ciInf_const
theorem sInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.2 <| sSup_of_not_bddAbove <| mt bddAbove_neg.1 hs
theorem iInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (Set.range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = 0 :=
sInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are at most some nonnegative number `a` to show that `sSup s ≤ a`.
See also `csSup_le`. -/
protected lemma sSup_le (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
exacts [sSup_empty.trans_le ha, csSup_le hs' hs]
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty, it suffices to show
that all values of `f` are at most some nonnegative number `a` to show that `⨆ i, f i ≤ a`.
See also `ciSup_le`. -/
protected lemma iSup_le (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⨆ i, f i ≤ a :=
Real.sSup_le (Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf) ha
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are at least some nonpositive number `a` to show that `a ≤ sInf s`.
See also `le_csInf`. -/
protected lemma le_sInf (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x) (ha : a ≤ 0) : a ≤ sInf s := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
exacts [ha.trans_eq sInf_empty.symm, le_csInf hs' hs]
/-- As `⨅ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty, it suffices to show
that all values of `f` are at least some nonpositive number `a` to show that `a ≤ ⨅ i, f i`.
See also `le_ciInf`. -/
protected lemma le_iInf (hf : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) (ha : a ≤ 0) : a ≤ ⨅ i, f i :=
Real.le_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf) ha
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are nonpositive to show that `sSup s ≤ 0`. -/
lemma sSup_nonpos (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ 0) : sSup s ≤ 0 := Real.sSup_le hs le_rfl
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty,
it suffices to show that all values of `f` are nonpositive to show that `⨆ i, f i ≤ 0`. -/
lemma iSup_nonpos (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ 0) : ⨆ i, f i ≤ 0 := Real.iSup_le hf le_rfl
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is an empty set of reals, it suffices to show that all elements of `s`
are nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ sInf s`. -/
lemma sInf_nonneg (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sInf s := Real.le_sInf hs le_rfl
/-- As `⨅ i, f i = 0` when the domain of the real-valued function `f` is empty,
it suffices to show that all values of `f` are nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ ⨅ i, f i`. -/
lemma iInf_nonneg (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : 0 ≤ iInf f := Real.le_iInf hf le_rfl
/-- As `sSup s = 0` when `s` is a set of reals that's unbounded above, it suffices to show that `s`
contains a nonnegative element to show that `0 ≤ sSup s`. -/
lemma sSup_nonneg' (hs : ∃ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sSup s := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ := hs
exact dite _ (fun h ↦ le_csSup_of_le h hxs hx) fun h ↦ (sSup_of_not_bddAbove h).ge
/-- As `⨆ i, f i = 0` when the real-valued function `f` is unbounded above,
it suffices to show that `f` takes a nonnegative value to show that `0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i`. -/
| lemma iSup_nonneg' (hf : ∃ i, 0 ≤ f i) : 0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i := sSup_nonneg' <| Set.exists_range_iff.2 hf
/-- As `sInf s = 0` when `s` is a set of reals that's unbounded below, it suffices to show that `s`
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean | 261 | 263 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# `Tendsto` for relations and partial functions
This file generalizes `Filter` definitions from functions to partial functions and relations.
## Considering functions and partial functions as relations
A function `f : α → β` can be considered as the relation `Rel α β` which relates `x` and `f x` for
all `x`, and nothing else. This relation is called `Function.Graph f`.
A partial function `f : α →. β` can be considered as the relation `Rel α β` which relates `x` and
`f x` for all `x` for which `f x` exists, and nothing else. This relation is called
`PFun.Graph' f`.
In this regard, a function is a relation for which every element in `α` is related to exactly one
element in `β` and a partial function is a relation for which every element in `α` is related to at
most one element in `β`.
This file leverages this analogy to generalize `Filter` definitions from functions to partial
functions and relations.
## Notes
`Set.preimage` can be generalized to relations in two ways:
* `Rel.preimage` returns the image of the set under the inverse relation.
* `Rel.core` returns the set of elements that are only related to those in the set.
Both generalizations are sensible in the context of filters, so `Filter.comap` and `Filter.Tendsto`
get two generalizations each.
We first take care of relations. Then the definitions for partial functions are taken as special
cases of the definitions for relations.
-/
universe u v w
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Filter
/-! ### Relations -/
/-- The forward map of a filter under a relation. Generalization of `Filter.map` to relations. Note
that `Rel.core` generalizes `Set.preimage`. -/
def rmap (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) : Filter β where
sets := { s | r.core s ∈ l }
univ_sets := by simp
sets_of_superset hs st := mem_of_superset hs (Rel.core_mono _ st)
inter_sets hs ht := by
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
convert inter_mem hs ht
rw [← Rel.core_inter]
theorem rmap_sets (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) : (l.rmap r).sets = r.core ⁻¹' l.sets :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_rmap (r : Rel α β) (l : Filter α) (s : Set β) : s ∈ l.rmap r ↔ r.core s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem rmap_rmap (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (l : Filter α) :
rmap s (rmap r l) = rmap (r.comp s) l :=
filter_eq <| by simp [rmap_sets, Set.preimage, Rel.core_comp]
@[simp]
| theorem rmap_compose (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : rmap s ∘ rmap r = rmap (r.comp s) :=
funext <| rmap_rmap _ _
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Partial.lean | 78 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ULift
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.CharZero
/-!
# Further basic results about `Algebra`.
This file could usefully be split further.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
open Function
namespace Algebra
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type w}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
section PUnit
instance _root_.PUnit.algebra : Algebra R PUnit.{v + 1} where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun _ := PUnit.unit
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
commutes' _ _ := rfl
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_pUnit (r : R) : algebraMap R PUnit r = PUnit.unit :=
rfl
end PUnit
section ULift
instance _root_.ULift.algebra : Algebra R (ULift A) :=
{ ULift.module' with
algebraMap :=
{ (ULift.ringEquiv : ULift A ≃+* A).symm.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap R A) with
toFun := fun r => ULift.up (algebraMap R A r) }
commutes' := fun r x => ULift.down_injective <| Algebra.commutes r x.down
smul_def' := fun r x => ULift.down_injective <| Algebra.smul_def' r x.down }
theorem _root_.ULift.algebraMap_eq (r : R) :
algebraMap R (ULift A) r = ULift.up (algebraMap R A r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ULift.down_algebraMap (r : R) : (algebraMap R (ULift A) r).down = algebraMap R A r :=
rfl
end ULift
/-- Algebra over a subsemiring. This builds upon `Subsemiring.module`. -/
instance ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) : Algebra S A where
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp S.subtype
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := Algebra.commutes (r : R) x
smul_def' r x := Algebra.smul_def (r : R) x
theorem algebraMap_ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S →+* R) = Subsemiring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebraMap_ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) : (algebraMap S R : S → R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_ofSubsemiring_apply (S : Subsemiring R) (x : S) : algebraMap S R x = x :=
rfl
/-- Algebra over a subring. This builds upon `Subring.module`. -/
instance ofSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (S : Subring R) :
Algebra S A where
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp S.subtype
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := Algebra.commutes (r : R) x
smul_def' r x := Algebra.smul_def (r : R) x
theorem algebraMap_ofSubring {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S →+* R) = Subring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebraMap_ofSubring {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S → R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_ofSubring_apply {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) (x : S) :
algebraMap S R x = x :=
rfl
/-- Explicit characterization of the submonoid map in the case of an algebra.
`S` is made explicit to help with type inference -/
def algebraMapSubmonoid (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) : Submonoid S :=
M.map (algebraMap R S)
theorem mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {M : Submonoid R}
(x : M) : algebraMap R S x ∈ algebraMapSubmonoid S M :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem (algebraMap R S) x.2
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) :
x * (x - algebraMap R A r) = (x - algebraMap R A r) * x := by rw [mul_sub, ← commutes, sub_mul]
theorem mul_sub_algebraMap_pow_commutes [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
x * (x - algebraMap R A r) ^ n = (x - algebraMap R A r) ^ n * x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes, mul_assoc, ih, ← mul_assoc]
end CommSemiring
section Ring
/-- A `Semiring` that is an `Algebra` over a commutative ring carries a natural `Ring` structure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev semiringToRing (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Ring A :=
{ __ := (inferInstance : Semiring A)
__ := Module.addCommMonoidToAddCommGroup R
intCast := fun z => algebraMap R A z
intCast_ofNat := fun z => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, map_natCast]
intCast_negSucc := fun z => by simp }
instance {R : Type*} [Ring R] : Algebra (Subring.center R) R where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun := Subtype.val
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
commutes' r x := (Subring.mem_center_iff.1 r.2 x).symm
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
end Ring
end Algebra
open scoped Algebra
namespace Module
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
variable [SMulCommClass S R M] [SMul R S] [IsScalarTower R S M]
instance End.instAlgebra : Algebra R (Module.End S M) :=
Algebra.ofModule smul_mul_assoc fun r f g => (smul_comm r f g).symm
-- to prove this is a special case of the above
example : Algebra R (Module.End R M) := End.instAlgebra _ _ _
theorem algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id (a : R) : algebraMap R (End S M) a = a • LinearMap.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_end_apply (a : R) (m : M) : algebraMap R (End S M) a m = a • m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_algebraMap_end (K : Type u) (V : Type v) [Semifield K] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
(a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : LinearMap.ker ((algebraMap K (End K V)) a) = ⊥ :=
LinearMap.ker_smul _ _ ha
section
variable {R M}
theorem End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff {x : R}
(h : IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End S M) x)) (m m' : M) :
(↑(h.unit⁻¹) : Module.End S M) m = m' ↔ m = x • m' where
mp H := H ▸ (isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h m).symm
mpr H :=
H.symm ▸ by
apply_fun ⇑h.unit.val using ((isUnit_iff _).mp h).injective
simpa using Module.End.isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h (x • m')
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-28")]
alias End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff := End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff
theorem End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff' {x : R}
(h : IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End S M) x)) (m m' : M) :
m' = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : Module.End S M) m ↔ m = x • m' where
mp H := H ▸ (isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h m).symm
mpr H :=
H.symm ▸ by
apply_fun (↑h.unit : M → M) using ((isUnit_iff _).mp h).injective
simpa using isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h (x • m') |>.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-28")]
alias End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff' := End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff'
end
end Module
namespace LinearMap
variable {R : Type*} {A : Type*} {B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
/-- An alternate statement of `LinearMap.map_smul` for when `algebraMap` is more convenient to
work with than `•`. -/
theorem map_algebraMap_mul (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (a : A) (r : R) :
f (algebraMap R A r * a) = algebraMap R B r * f a := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← Algebra.smul_def, map_smul]
theorem map_mul_algebraMap (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (a : A) (r : R) :
f (a * algebraMap R A r) = f a * algebraMap R B r := by
rw [← Algebra.commutes, ← Algebra.commutes, map_algebraMap_mul]
|
end LinearMap
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Basic.lean | 234 | 236 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleRing.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformRing
/-!
# Completion of topological fields
The goal of this file is to prove the main part of Proposition 7 of Bourbaki GT III 6.8 :
The completion `hat K` of a Hausdorff topological field is a field if the image under
the mapping `x ↦ x⁻¹` of every Cauchy filter (with respect to the additive uniform structure)
which does not have a cluster point at `0` is a Cauchy filter
(with respect to the additive uniform structure).
Bourbaki does not give any detail here, he refers to the general discussion of extending
functions defined on a dense subset with values in a complete Hausdorff space. In particular
the subtlety about clustering at zero is totally left to readers.
Note that the separated completion of a non-separated topological field is the zero ring, hence
the separation assumption is needed. Indeed the kernel of the completion map is the closure of
zero which is an ideal. Hence it's either zero (and the field is separated) or the full field,
which implies one is sent to zero and the completion ring is trivial.
The main definition is `CompletableTopField` which packages the assumptions as a Prop-valued
type class and the main results are the instances `UniformSpace.Completion.Field` and
`UniformSpace.Completion.IsTopologicalDivisionRing`.
-/
noncomputable section
open uniformity Topology
open Set UniformSpace UniformSpace.Completion Filter
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [UniformSpace K]
local notation "hat" => Completion
/-- A topological field is completable if it is separated and the image under
the mapping x ↦ x⁻¹ of every Cauchy filter (with respect to the additive uniform structure)
which does not have a cluster point at 0 is a Cauchy filter
(with respect to the additive uniform structure). This ensures the completion is
a field.
-/
class CompletableTopField : Prop extends T0Space K where
nice : ∀ F : Filter K, Cauchy F → 𝓝 0 ⊓ F = ⊥ → Cauchy (map (fun x => x⁻¹) F)
namespace UniformSpace
namespace Completion
instance (priority := 100) [T0Space K] : Nontrivial (hat K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h => zero_ne_one <| (isUniformEmbedding_coe K).injective h⟩⟩
variable {K}
/-- extension of inversion to the completion of a field. -/
def hatInv : hat K → hat K :=
isDenseInducing_coe.extend fun x : K => (↑x⁻¹ : hat K)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuous_hatInv [CompletableTopField K] {x : hat K} (h : x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt hatInv x := by
refine isDenseInducing_coe.continuousAt_extend ?_
apply mem_of_superset (compl_singleton_mem_nhds h)
intro y y_ne
rw [mem_compl_singleton_iff] at y_ne
apply CompleteSpace.complete
have : (fun (x : K) => (↑x⁻¹ : hat K)) =
((fun (y : K) => (↑y : hat K))∘(fun (x : K) => (x⁻¹ : K))) := by
unfold Function.comp
simp
rw [this, ← Filter.map_map]
apply Cauchy.map _ (Completion.uniformContinuous_coe K)
apply CompletableTopField.nice
· haveI := isDenseInducing_coe.comap_nhds_neBot y
apply cauchy_nhds.comap
rw [Completion.comap_coe_eq_uniformity]
· have eq_bot : 𝓝 (0 : hat K) ⊓ 𝓝 y = ⊥ := by
by_contra h
exact y_ne (eq_of_nhds_neBot <| neBot_iff.mpr h).symm
rw [isDenseInducing_coe.nhds_eq_comap (0 : K), ← Filter.comap_inf]
norm_cast
rw [eq_bot]
exact comap_bot
open Classical in
/--
The value of `hat_inv` at zero is not really specified, although it's probably zero.
Here we explicitly enforce the `inv_zero` axiom.
-/
instance instInvCompletion : Inv (hat K) :=
⟨fun x => if x = 0 then 0 else hatInv x⟩
variable [IsTopologicalDivisionRing K]
theorem hatInv_extends {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : hatInv (x : hat K) = ↑(x⁻¹ : K) :=
isDenseInducing_coe.extend_eq_at ((continuous_coe K).continuousAt.comp (continuousAt_inv₀ h))
variable [CompletableTopField K]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (x : K) : (x : hat K)⁻¹ = ((x⁻¹ : K) : hat K) := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero]
dsimp [Inv.inv]
norm_cast
simp
· conv_lhs => dsimp [Inv.inv]
rw [if_neg]
· exact hatInv_extends h
· exact fun H => h (isDenseEmbedding_coe.injective H)
variable [IsUniformAddGroup K]
theorem mul_hatInv_cancel {x : hat K} (x_ne : x ≠ 0) : x * hatInv x = 1 := by
haveI : T1Space (hat K) := T2Space.t1Space
let f := fun x : hat K => x * hatInv x
let c := (fun (x : K) => (x : hat K))
change f x = 1
| have cont : ContinuousAt f x := by
fun_prop (disch := assumption)
have clo : x ∈ closure (c '' {0}ᶜ) := by
have := isDenseInducing_coe.dense x
rw [← image_univ, show (univ : Set K) = {0} ∪ {0}ᶜ from (union_compl_self _).symm,
image_union] at this
apply mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union this
rw [image_singleton]
exact compl_singleton_mem_nhds x_ne
have fxclo : f x ∈ closure (f '' (c '' {0}ᶜ)) := mem_closure_image cont clo
have : f '' (c '' {0}ᶜ) ⊆ {1} := by
rw [image_image]
rintro _ ⟨z, z_ne, rfl⟩
rw [mem_singleton_iff]
rw [mem_compl_singleton_iff] at z_ne
dsimp [f]
rw [hatInv_extends z_ne, ← coe_mul]
rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ z_ne, coe_one]
replace fxclo := closure_mono this fxclo
rwa [closure_singleton, mem_singleton_iff] at fxclo
instance instField : Field (hat K) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, fun h => zero_ne_one ((isUniformEmbedding_coe K).injective h)⟩
mul_inv_cancel := fun x x_ne => by simp only [Inv.inv, if_neg x_ne, mul_hatInv_cancel x_ne]
inv_zero := by simp only [Inv.inv, ite_true]
-- TODO: use a better defeq
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/UniformField.lean | 126 | 153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
| theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 822 | 826 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Exponentially tilted measures
The exponential tilting of a measure `μ` on `α` by a function `f : α → ℝ` is the measure with
density `x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ y, exp (f y) ∂μ` with respect to `μ`. This is sometimes also called
the Esscher transform.
The definition is mostly used for `f` linear, in which case the exponentially tilted measure belongs
to the natural exponential family of the base measure. Exponentially tilted measures for general `f`
can be used for example to establish variational expressions for the Kullback-Leibler divergence.
## Main definitions
* `Measure.tilted μ f`: exponential tilting of `μ` by `f`, equal to
`μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))`.
-/
open Real
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Exponentially tilted measure. When `x ↦ exp (f x)` is integrable, `μ.tilted f` is the
probability measure with density with respect to `μ` proportional to `exp (f x)`. Otherwise it is 0.
-/
noncomputable
def Measure.tilted (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) : Measure α :=
μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_integrable (hf : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
rw [Measure.tilted, integral_undef hf]
simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_aemeasurable (hf : ¬ AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
refine tilted_of_not_integrable ?_
suffices ¬ AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ by exact fun h ↦ this h.1.aemeasurable
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h)
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ) : (0 : Measure α).tilted f = 0 := by simp [Measure.tilted]
@[simp]
lemma tilted_const' (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => rw [h]; simp
| inr h0 =>
simp only [Measure.tilted, withDensity_const, integral_const, smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h_univ : μ Set.univ = ∞
· simp only [measureReal_def, h_univ, ENNReal.toReal_top, zero_mul, div_zero,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, zero_smul, ENNReal.inv_top]
congr
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ (exp_pos _).ne', mul_one,
measureReal_def, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
simp [h0.out]
| lemma tilted_const (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = μ := by simp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Tilted.lean | 70 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
- Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : α ⊕ (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {f : t.varFinset → β}
{v : β → M} (v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(t.restrictVar f).realize v = t.realize v' := by
induction t with
| var => simp [restrictVar, hv']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i ((by simp [Function.comp_apply, hv'])))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar' [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v :=
realize_restrictVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)}
{f : t.varFinsetLeft → β}
{xs : β ⊕ γ → M} (xs' : α → M) (hxs' : ∀ a, xs (Sum.inl (f a)) = xs' a) :
(t.restrictVarLeft f).realize xs = t.realize (Sum.elim xs' (xs ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
induction t with
| var a => cases a <;> simp [restrictVarLeft, hxs']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (by simp [hxs']))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVarLeft`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft' [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
realize_restrictVarLeft _ (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => simp
| @func n f ts ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· obtain - | f := f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (α ⊕ β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction t with
| var ab => rcases ab with a | b <;> simp [Language.con]
| func f ts ih =>
simp only [realize, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, ih, varsToConstants]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem HomClass.realize_term {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [HomClass L F M N]
(g : F) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, HomClass.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, max, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{v' : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs : Fin n → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs) = t.realize (Sum.elim v xs))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).Realize v' xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe [L'.Structure M] {k : ℕ}
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin (k + n)))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
(v : ∀ {n}, (Fin (k + n) → M) → α → M) {v' : β → M} (xs : Fin (k + n) → M)
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs' : Fin (k + n) → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs') = t.realize (Sum.elim (v xs') (xs' ∘ Fin.natAdd _)))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x)
(hv : ∀ (n) (xs : Fin (k + n) → M) (x : M), @v (n + 1) (snoc xs x : Fin _ → M) = v xs) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => castLE (add_assoc _ _ _).symm.le).Realize v' xs ↔
φ.Realize (v xs) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd _) := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, hv]
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {m n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {g : α → β ⊕ (Fin m)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (m + n) → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ Fin.castAdd n) ∘ g) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd m) := by
apply realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + n') → M}
(hmn : m + n' ≤ n + 1) :
(φ.liftAt n' m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') := by
rw [liftAt]
induction φ with
| falsum => simp [mapTermRel, Realize]
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1 hmn, ih2 hmn]
| @all k _ ih3 =>
have h : k + 1 + n' = k + n' + 1 := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1 n', ← add_assoc]
simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_castLE_of_eq h, ih3 (hmn.trans k.succ.le_succ)]
refine forall_congr' fun x => iff_eq_eq.mpr (congr rfl (funext (Fin.lastCases ?_ fun i => ?_)))
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, val_last, snoc_last]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
split_ifs <;> dsimp; omega
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, Fin.snoc_castSucc]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_castSucc _ _ _)
simp only [coe_castSucc, coe_cast]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt_one {n m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + 1) → M}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(φ.liftAt 1 m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then castSucc i else i.succ) := by
simp [realize_liftAt (add_le_add_right hmn 1), castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin (n + 1) → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ castSucc) := by
rw [realize_liftAt_one (refl n), iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_))
rw [if_pos i.is_lt]
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.subst tf).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (fun a => (tf a).realize v) xs :=
realize_mapTermRel_id
(fun n t x => by
rw [Term.realize_subst]
rcongr a
cases a
· simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Function.comp_apply, Term.realize_relabel, Sum.elim_comp_inl]
· rfl)
(by simp)
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
{f : φ.freeVarFinset → β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(φ.restrictFreeVar f).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v' xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_2]
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv']), realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| rel =>
simp only [Realize, freeVarFinset.eq_3, Finset.biUnion_val, restrictFreeVar]
congr!
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_4]
rw [ih1, ih2] <;> simp [hv']
| all _ ih3 =>
simp only [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
refine forall_congr' (fun _ => ?_)
rw [ih3]; simp [hv']
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictFreeVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar' [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑φ.freeVarFinset ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.restrictFreeVar (Set.inclusion h)).Realize (v ∘ (↑)) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs :=
realize_restrictFreeVar _ (by simp)
|
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquiv [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{n} {φ : L[[α]].BoundedFormula β n} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquiv φ).Realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun n R xs => ?_
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 441 | 445 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Approximations
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.CorrectnessTerminating
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Floor
/-!
# Termination of Continued Fraction Computations (`GenContFract.of`)
## Summary
We show that the continued fraction for a value `v`, as defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Basic`, terminates if and only if `v` corresponds to a
rational number, that is `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Main Theorems
- `GenContFract.coe_of_rat_eq` shows that
`GenContFract.of v = GenContFract.of q` for `v : α` given that `↑v = q` and `q : ℚ`.
- `GenContFract.terminates_iff_rat` shows that
`GenContFract.of v` terminates if and only if `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Tags
rational, continued fraction, termination
-/
namespace GenContFract
open GenContFract (of)
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [FloorRing K]
/-
We will have to constantly coerce along our structures in the following proofs using their provided
map functions.
-/
attribute [local simp] Pair.map IntFractPair.mapFr
section RatOfTerminates
/-!
### Terminating Continued Fractions Are Rational
We want to show that the computation of a continued fraction `GenContFract.of v`
terminates if and only if `v ∈ ℚ`. In this section, we show the implication from left to right.
We first show that every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number `q` and then use the
finite correctness proof (`of_correctness_of_terminates`) of `GenContFract.of` to show that
`v = ↑q`.
-/
variable (v : K) (n : ℕ)
nonrec theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_contsAux :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).contsAux n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) :=
Nat.strong_induction_on n
(by
clear n
let g := of v
intro n IH
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
-- n = 0
· suffices ∃ gp : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk (1 : K) 0 = gp.map (↑) by simpa [contsAux]
use Pair.mk 1 0
simp
-- n = 1
· suffices ∃ conts : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk g.h 1 = conts.map (↑) by simpa [contsAux]
use Pair.mk ⌊v⌋ 1
simp [g]
-- 2 ≤ n
· obtain ⟨pred_conts, pred_conts_eq⟩ := IH (n + 1) <| lt_add_one (n + 1)
-- invoke the IH
rcases s_ppred_nth_eq : g.s.get? n with gp_n | gp_n
-- option.none
· use pred_conts
have : g.contsAux (n + 2) = g.contsAux (n + 1) :=
contsAux_stable_of_terminated (n + 1).le_succ s_ppred_nth_eq
simp only [g, this, pred_conts_eq]
-- option.some
· -- invoke the IH a second time
obtain ⟨ppred_conts, ppred_conts_eq⟩ :=
IH n <| lt_of_le_of_lt n.le_succ <| lt_add_one <| n + 1
obtain ⟨a_eq_one, z, b_eq_z⟩ : gp_n.a = 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, gp_n.b = (z : K) :=
of_partNum_eq_one_and_exists_int_partDen_eq s_ppred_nth_eq
-- finally, unfold the recurrence to obtain the required rational value.
simp only [g, a_eq_one, b_eq_z,
contsAux_recurrence s_ppred_nth_eq ppred_conts_eq pred_conts_eq]
use nextConts 1 (z : ℚ) ppred_conts pred_conts
cases ppred_conts; cases pred_conts
simp [nextConts, nextNum, nextDen])
theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).conts n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) := by
rw [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_contAux]; exact exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_contsAux v <| n + 1
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_num : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).nums n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨a, _⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use a
simp [num_eq_conts_a, nth_cont_eq]
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_den : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).dens n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨_, b⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use b
simp [den_eq_conts_b, nth_cont_eq]
/-- Every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number. -/
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_conv : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).convs n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_rat_eq_nth_num v n with ⟨Aₙ, nth_num_eq⟩
rcases exists_rat_eq_nth_den v n with ⟨Bₙ, nth_den_eq⟩
use Aₙ / Bₙ
simp [nth_num_eq, nth_den_eq, conv_eq_num_div_den]
variable {v}
|
/-- Every terminating continued fraction corresponds to a rational number. -/
theorem exists_rat_eq_of_terminates (terminates : (of v).Terminates) : ∃ q : ℚ, v = ↑q := by
obtain ⟨n, v_eq_conv⟩ : ∃ n, v = (of v).convs n := of_correctness_of_terminates terminates
obtain ⟨q, conv_eq_q⟩ : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).convs n = (↑q : K) := exists_rat_eq_nth_conv v n
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Computation/TerminatesIffRat.lean | 119 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.NormalizedFactors
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file starts looking like the ring theory of $R[X]$
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {k : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero
(p : R[X]) (t : R) (hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t :=
(le_rootMultiplicity_iff hnezero).2 <|
pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : Polynomial.IsRoot p t)
(hnzd : (p.rootMultiplicity t : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(derivative p).rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
obtain ⟨g, hp, hndvd⟩ := p.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
have hm : m - 1 + 1 = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel <| (rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt
have hndvd : ¬(X - C t) ^ m ∣ derivative p := by
rw [hp, derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right _ _),
derivative_X_sub_C_pow, ← hm, pow_succ, hm, mul_comm (C _), mul_assoc,
dvd_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C t |>.pow _ |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot] at hndvd ⊢
rwa [eval_mul, eval_C, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd]
have hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ hndvd (by rw [h]; exact dvd_zero _)
exact le_antisymm (by rwa [rootMultiplicity_le_iff hnezero, hm])
(rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero _ t hnezero)
theorem isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < p.rootMultiplicity t) : (derivative^[n] p).IsRoot t :=
dvd_iff_isRoot.mp <| (dvd_pow_self _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn).trans
(pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd _ <| p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
open Finset in
theorem eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(derivative^[p.rootMultiplicity t] p).eval t =
(p.rootMultiplicity t).factorial • (p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t := by
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t with hm
conv_lhs => rw [← p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t, ← hm]
rw [iterate_derivative_mul, eval_finset_sum, sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (mem_range.mpr m.succ_pos)]
· rw [m.choose_zero_right, one_smul, eval_mul, m.sub_zero, iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow_self,
eval_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]; rfl
· intro b hb hb0
rw [iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow, eval_smul, eval_mul, eval_smul, eval_pow,
Nat.sub_sub_self (mem_range_succ_iff.mp hb), eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self,
zero_pow hb0, smul_zero, zero_mul, smul_zero]
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_contra! h'
replace hroot := hroot _ h'
simp only [IsRoot, eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity] at hroot
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := Nat.cast_dvd_cast (α := R) <| Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial h'
rw [hq, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors] at hnzd
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd.1] at hroot
exact eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero t h hroot
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
apply lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot
clear hroot
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
exact Submonoid.one_mem _
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors]
exact ⟨hnzd _ le_rfl n.succ_ne_zero, ih fun m h ↦ hnzd m (h.trans n.le_succ)⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| hm.trans_lt hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hr hnzd⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors' h hr hnzd⟩
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ 1, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h
(by rw [Nat.factorial_one, Nat.cast_one]; exact Submonoid.one_mem _)
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ p.IsRoot t ∧ (derivative p).IsRoot t := by
rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative h]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h 0 (by norm_num), h 1 (by norm_num)⟩, fun ⟨h0, h1⟩ m hm ↦ ?_⟩
obtain (_|_|m) := m
exacts [h0, h1, by omega]
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_gcd
[GCDMonoid R[X]] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ (gcd p (derivative p)).IsRoot t := by
simp_rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot h, ← dvd_iff_isRoot, dvd_gcd_iff]
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root [CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : p.IsRoot t) :
p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· rw [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
exact derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hpt <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt).ne'
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity [CharZero R] (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_cases h : p.IsRoot t
· exact (derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root h).symm.le
· rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_zero h, zero_tsub]
exact zero_le _
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative h hr⟩
/-- A sufficient condition for the set of roots of a nonzero polynomial `f` to be a subset of the
set of roots of `g` is that `f` divides `f.derivative * g`. Over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero, this is also a necessary condition.
See `isRoot_of_isRoot_iff_dvd_derivative_mul` -/
theorem isRoot_of_isRoot_of_dvd_derivative_mul [CharZero R] {f g : R[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0)
(hfd : f ∣ f.derivative * g) {a : R} (haf : f.IsRoot a) : g.IsRoot a := by
rcases hfd with ⟨r, hr⟩
have hdf0 : derivative f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! haf
rw [eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero haf] at hf0 ⊢
exact not_isRoot_C _ _ <| C_ne_zero.mp hf0
by_contra hg
have hdfg0 : f.derivative * g ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hdf0 (by rintro rfl; simp at hg)
have hr' := congr_arg (rootMultiplicity a) hr
rw [rootMultiplicity_mul hdfg0, derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root haf,
rootMultiplicity_eq_zero hg, add_zero, rootMultiplicity_mul (hr ▸ hdfg0), add_comm,
Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.succ_le_iff.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos hf0).2 haf))] at hr'
omega
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
instance instNormalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid R[X] where
normUnit p :=
⟨C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff), C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff)⁻¹, by
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1], by rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.inv_mul, C_1]⟩
normUnit_zero := Units.ext (by simp)
normUnit_mul hp0 hq0 :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at *
rw [leadingCoeff_mul, normUnit_mul hp0 hq0, Units.val_mul, C_mul])
normUnit_coe_units u :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [← mul_one u⁻¹, Units.val_mul, Units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq]
rcases Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 ⟨u, rfl⟩ with ⟨_, ⟨w, rfl⟩, h2⟩
rw [← h2, leadingCoeff_C, normUnit_coe_units, ← C_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem coe_normUnit {p : R[X]} : (normUnit p : R[X]) = C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff) := by
simp [normUnit]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_normalize (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (normalize p) = normalize (leadingCoeff p) := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem Monic.normalize_eq_self {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : normalize p = p := by
simp only [Polynomial.coe_normUnit, normalize_apply, hp.leadingCoeff, normUnit_one,
Units.val_one, Polynomial.C.map_one, mul_one]
theorem roots_normalize {p : R[X]} : (normalize p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [normalize_apply, mul_comm, coe_normUnit, roots_C_mul _ (normUnit (leadingCoeff p)).ne_zero]
theorem normUnit_X : normUnit (X : Polynomial R) = 1 := by
have := coe_normUnit (R := R) (p := X)
rwa [leadingCoeff_X, normUnit_one, Units.val_one, map_one, Units.val_eq_one] at this
theorem X_eq_normalize : (X : Polynomial R) = normalize X := by
simp only [normalize_apply, normUnit_X, Units.val_one, mul_one]
end NormalizationMonoid
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_pos_of_ne_zero_of_nonunit (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hp : ¬IsUnit p) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h] at hp0 hp
exact hp (IsUnit.map C (IsUnit.mk0 (coeff p 0) (mt C_inj.2 (by simpa using hp0))))
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [Polynomial.ext_iff]
congr!
simp [map_eq_zero, coeff_map, coeff_zero]
theorem map_ne_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
p.degree_map_eq_of_injective f.injective
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map _ f)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
simp only [← coeff_natDegree, coeff_map f, natDegree_map]
theorem monic_map_iff [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} {p : R[X]} :
(p.map f).Monic ↔ p.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_map, ← f.map_one, Function.Injective.eq_iff f.injective, Monic]
end DivisionRing
section Field
variable [Field R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero : IsUnit p ↔ degree p = 0 :=
⟨degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit, fun h =>
have : degree p ≤ 0 := by simp [*, le_refl]
have hc : coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := fun hc => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, hc] at h; simp only [map_zero] at h; contradiction
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2
⟨C (coeff p 0)⁻¹, by
conv in p => rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this]
rw [← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hc, C_1]⟩⟩
/-- Division of polynomials. See `Polynomial.divByMonic` for more details. -/
def div (p q : R[X]) :=
C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹))
/-- Remainder of polynomial division. See `Polynomial.modByMonic` for more details. -/
def mod (p q : R[X]) :=
p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)
private theorem quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux (p q : R[X]) : q * div p q + mod p q = p := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, mod, modByMonic_zero, zero_add]
· conv =>
rhs
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv h)]
rw [div, mod, add_comm, mul_assoc]
private theorem remainder_lt_aux (p : R[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) : degree (mod p q) < degree q := by
rw [← degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
exact degree_modByMonic_lt p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq)
instance : Div R[X] :=
⟨div⟩
instance : Mod R[X] :=
⟨mod⟩
theorem div_def : p / q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) :=
rfl
theorem mod_def : p % q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := rfl
theorem modByMonic_eq_mod (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p % q :=
show p %ₘ q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, mul_one, C_1]
theorem divByMonic_eq_div (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p /ₘ q = p / q :=
show p /ₘ q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, C_1, one_mul, mul_one]
theorem mod_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : R[X]) (a : R) : p % (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
modByMonic_eq_mod p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval _ _
theorem mul_div_eq_iff_isRoot : (X - C a) * (p / (X - C a)) = p ↔ IsRoot p a :=
divByMonic_eq_div p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot
instance instEuclideanDomain : EuclideanDomain R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.commRing,
Polynomial.nontrivial with
quotient := (· / ·)
quotient_zero := by simp [div_def]
remainder := (· % ·)
r := _
r_wellFounded := degree_lt_wf
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq := quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux
remainder_lt := fun _ _ hq => remainder_lt_aux _ hq
mul_left_not_lt := fun _ _ hq => not_lt_of_ge (degree_le_mul_left _ hq) }
theorem mod_eq_self_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p % q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0, fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) ≤ degree p :=
not_le_of_gt <| by rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
rw [mod_def, modByMonic, dif_pos (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
unfold divModByMonicAux
dsimp
simp only [this, false_and, if_false]⟩
theorem div_eq_zero_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p / q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => by
have := EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q
rwa [h, mul_zero, zero_add, mod_eq_self_iff hq0] at this,
fun h => by
have hlt : degree p < degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := by
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
have hm : Monic (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0
rw [div_def, (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hm).2 hlt, mul_zero]⟩
theorem degree_add_div (hq0 : q ≠ 0) (hpq : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p / q) = degree p := by
have : degree (p % q) < degree (q * (p / q)) :=
calc
degree (p % q) < degree q := EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0
_ ≤ _ := degree_le_mul_left _ (mt (div_eq_zero_iff hq0).1 (not_lt_of_ge hpq))
conv_rhs =>
rw [← EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_mul]
theorem degree_div_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p / q) ≤ degree p := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq]; exact degree_divByMonic_le _ _
theorem degree_div_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : 0 < degree q) : degree (p / q) < degree p := by
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := fun hq0 => by simp [hq0] at hq
rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]
exact degree_divByMonic_lt _ (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0) hp
(by rw [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]; exact hq)
theorem isUnit_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsUnit (p.map f) ↔ IsUnit p := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero, degree_map]
theorem map_div [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p / q).map f = p.map f / q.map f := by
if hq0 : q = 0 then simp [hq0]
else
rw [div_def, div_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_divByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0),
Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, leadingCoeff_map, map_inv₀]
theorem map_mod [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p % q).map f = p.map f % q.map f := by
by_cases hq0 : q = 0
· simp [hq0]
· rw [mod_def, mod_def, leadingCoeff_map f, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C f, ← Polynomial.map_mul f,
map_modByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
lemma natDegree_mod_lt [Field k] (p : k[X]) {q : k[X]} (hq : q.natDegree ≠ 0) :
(p % q).natDegree < q.natDegree := by
have hq' : q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hq
simp [hq]
rw [mod_def]
refine (natDegree_modByMonic_lt p ?_ ?_).trans_le ?_
· refine monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one ?_
rw [mul_inv_eq_one₀ hq']
· contrapose! hq
rw [← natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one ((inv_mul_eq_one₀ hq').mpr rfl)]
simp [hq]
· exact natDegree_mul_C_le q q.leadingCoeff⁻¹
section
open EuclideanDomain
theorem gcd_map [Field k] [DecidableEq R] [DecidableEq k] (f : R →+* k) :
gcd (p.map f) (q.map f) = (gcd p q).map f :=
GCD.induction p q (fun x => by simp_rw [Polynomial.map_zero, EuclideanDomain.gcd_zero_left])
fun x y _ ih => by rw [gcd_val, ← map_mod, ih, ← gcd_val]
end
theorem eval₂_gcd_eq_zero [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} (hf : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0)
(hg : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
rw [EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_gcd_ab f g, Polynomial.eval₂_add, Polynomial.eval₂_mul,
Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hf, hg, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem eval_gcd_eq_zero [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R}
(hf : f.eval α = 0) (hg : g.eval α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval α = 0 :=
eval₂_gcd_eq_zero hf hg
theorem root_left_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_right_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_gcd_iff_root_left_right [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ↔ f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ∧ g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨root_left_of_root_gcd h, root_right_of_root_gcd h⟩, fun h => eval₂_gcd_eq_zero h.1 h.2⟩
theorem isRoot_gcd_iff_isRoot_left_right [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).IsRoot α ↔ f.IsRoot α ∧ g.IsRoot α :=
root_gcd_iff_root_left_right
theorem isCoprime_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsCoprime (p.map f) (q.map f) ↔ IsCoprime p q := by
classical
rw [← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, ← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, gcd_map, isUnit_map]
theorem mem_roots_map [CommRing k] [IsDomain k] {f : R →+* k} {x : k} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots (map_ne_zero hp), IsRoot, Polynomial.eval_map]
theorem rootSet_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).rootSet S = {0} := by
classical
rw [rootSet, aroots_monomial ha,
Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.coe_singleton]
theorem rootSet_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : rootSet (C a * X ^ n) S = {0} := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, rootSet_monomial hn ha]
theorem rootSet_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).rootSet S = {0} := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n : R[X]), ← C_1, rootSet_C_mul_X_pow hn]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem rootSet_prod [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X])
(s : Finset ι) (h : s.prod f ≠ 0) : (s.prod f).rootSet S = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).rootSet S := by
classical
simp only [rootSet, aroots, ← Finset.mem_coe]
rw [Polynomial.map_prod, roots_prod, Finset.bind_toFinset, s.val_toFinset, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_prod, Ne, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X - C b).roots = {a⁻¹ * b} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X + C b).roots = {-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : p.roots = {-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0)} := by
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (show degree p ≤ 1 by rw [h])]
have : p.coeff 1 ≠ 0 := coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree h
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C _ this]
theorem exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : ∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
⟨-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0), by
rw [← mem_roots (by simp [← zero_le_degree_iff, h])]
simp [roots_degree_eq_one h]⟩
theorem coeff_inv_units (u : R[X]ˣ) (n : ℕ) : ((↑u : R[X]).coeff n)⁻¹ = (↑u⁻¹ : R[X]).coeff n := by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u), eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u⁻¹),
coeff_C, coeff_C, inv_eq_one_div]
split_ifs
· rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq (coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero u), coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero,
coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, ← eval_mul, ← Units.val_mul, inv_mul_cancel]
simp
· simp
theorem monic_normalize [DecidableEq R] (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : Monic (normalize p) := by
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← Ne, ← isUnit_iff_ne_zero] at hp0
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_normalize, normalize_eq_one]
apply hp0
theorem leadingCoeff_div (hpq : q.degree ≤ p.degree) :
(p / q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff / q.leadingCoeff := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
rw [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C,
leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq) _, mul_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv]
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
theorem div_C_mul : p / (C a * q) = C a⁻¹ * (p / q) := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
simp only [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, mul_inv, leadingCoeff_C, C.map_mul, mul_assoc]
congr 3
rw [mul_left_comm q, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_dvd (ha : a ≠ 0) : C a * p ∣ q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun h => dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) h, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm p, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul, hr]⟩⟩
theorem dvd_C_mul (ha : a ≠ 0) : p ∣ Polynomial.C a * q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_left_comm p, ← hr, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul]⟩,
fun h => dvd_trans h (dvd_mul_left _ _)⟩
theorem coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero [DecidableEq R] (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(normUnit p : R[X]) = C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹ := by
have : p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp
simp [CommGroupWithZero.coe_normUnit _ this]
theorem map_dvd_map' [Field k] (f : R →+* k) {x y : R[X]} : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero, zero_dvd_iff, zero_dvd_iff, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
· classical
rw [← normalize_dvd_iff, ← @normalize_dvd_iff R[X], normalize_apply, normalize_apply,
coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero H, coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero (mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 H),
leadingCoeff_map, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C, ← Polynomial.map_mul,
map_dvd_map _ f.injective (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv H)]
@[simp]
theorem degree_normalize [DecidableEq R] : degree (normalize p) = degree p := by
simp [normalize_apply]
theorem prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Prime p := by
classical
have : Prime (normalize p) :=
Monic.prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 ▸ degree_normalize)
(monic_normalize fun hp0 => absurd hp1 (hp0.symm ▸ by simp [degree_zero]))
exact (normalize_associated _).prime this
theorem irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Irreducible p :=
(prime_of_degree_eq_one hp1).irreducible
theorem not_irreducible_C (x : R) : ¬Irreducible (C x) := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, C_0]
exact not_irreducible_zero
· exact fun hx => hx.not_isUnit <| isUnit_C.2 <| isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 H
theorem degree_pos_of_irreducible (hp : Irreducible p) : 0 < p.degree :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hp0 =>
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hp0
not_irreducible_C (p.coeff 0) <| this ▸ hp
theorem X_sub_C_mul_divByMonic_eq_sub_modByMonic {K : Type*} [Ring K] (f : K[X]) (a : K) :
(X - C a) * (f /ₘ (X - C a)) = f - f %ₘ (X - C a) := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div]
exact monic_X_sub_C a
theorem divByMonic_add_X_sub_C_mul_derivate_divByMonic_eq_derivative
{K : Type*} [CommRing K] (f : K[X]) (a : K) :
f /ₘ (X - C a) + (X - C a) * derivative (f /ₘ (X - C a)) = derivative f := by
have key := by apply congrArg derivative <| X_sub_C_mul_divByMonic_eq_sub_modByMonic f a
simpa only [derivative_mul, derivative_sub, derivative_X, derivative_C, sub_zero, one_mul,
modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval] using key
theorem X_sub_C_dvd_derivative_of_X_sub_C_dvd_divByMonic {K : Type*} [Field K] (f : K[X]) {a : K}
(hf : (X - C a) ∣ f /ₘ (X - C a)) : X - C a ∣ derivative f := by
have key := divByMonic_add_X_sub_C_mul_derivate_divByMonic_eq_derivative f a
have ⟨u,hu⟩ := hf
rw [← key, hu, ← mul_add (X - C a) u _]
use (u + derivative ((X - C a) * u))
/-- If `f` is a polynomial over a field, and `a : K` satisfies `f' a ≠ 0`,
then `f / (X - a)` is coprime with `X - a`.
Note that we do not assume `f a = 0`, because `f / (X - a) = (f - f a) / (X - a)`. -/
theorem isCoprime_of_is_root_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero {K : Type*} [Field K] (f : K[X]) (a : K)
(hf' : f.derivative.eval a ≠ 0) : IsCoprime (X - C a : K[X]) (f /ₘ (X - C a)) := by
classical
refine Or.resolve_left
(EuclideanDomain.dvd_or_coprime (X - C a) (f /ₘ (X - C a))
(irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (Polynomial.degree_X_sub_C a))) ?_
contrapose! hf' with h
have : X - C a ∣ derivative f := X_sub_C_dvd_derivative_of_X_sub_C_dvd_divByMonic f h
rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (monic_X_sub_C _), modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval] at this
rwa [← C_inj, C_0]
/-- To check a polynomial over a field is irreducible, it suffices to check only for
divisors that have smaller degree.
See also: `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree`.
-/
theorem irreducible_iff_degree_lt (p : R[X]) (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hpu : ¬ IsUnit p) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ q, q.degree ≤ ↑(natDegree p / 2) → q ∣ p → IsUnit q := by
rw [← irreducible_mul_leadingCoeff_inv,
(monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hp0).irreducible_iff_degree_lt]
| · simp [hp0, natDegree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv]
· contrapose! hpu
exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hpu
/-- To check a polynomial `p` over a field is irreducible, it suffices to check there are no
divisors of degree `0 < d ≤ degree p / 2`.
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/FieldDivision.lean | 633 | 638 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx, rpow_one]⟩
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
theorem eq_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
theorem rpow_inv_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
theorem _root_.Real.nnnorm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ ^ y := by
ext; exact Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg hx
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (↑(x ^ y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ y := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : ↑(x ^ y) = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
theorem rpow_ofNNReal {M : ℝ≥0} {P : ℝ} (hP : 0 ≤ P) : (M : ℝ≥0∞) ^ P = ↑(M ^ P) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hP, ← ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
cases x with
| top => exact (h'x rfl).elim
| coe x =>
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simp [h] at hx
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_add this]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
induction x using recTopCoe
· rcases hy.eq_or_lt with rfl|hy
· rw [rpow_zero, one_mul, zero_add]
rcases hz.eq_or_lt with rfl|hz
· rw [rpow_zero, mul_one, add_zero]
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, hy, hz, add_pos hy hz]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hy, hz, add_nonneg hy hz, NNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg _ hy hz]
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· have A : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, NNReal.rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
· have : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, h, this, NNReal.rpow_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases x
· cases n <;> simp [top_rpow_of_pos (Nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (Nat.cast_nonneg n)]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow_eq_ite (x y : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = if (x = 0 ∧ y = ⊤ ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y = 0) ∧ z < 0 then ⊤ else x ^ z * y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz); · simp
replace hz := hz.lt_or_lt
wlog hxy : x ≤ y
· convert this y x z hz (le_of_not_le hxy) using 2 <;> simp only [mul_comm, and_comm, or_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx0)
· induction y <;> rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [*, hz.not_lt]
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy0)
· exact (hx0 (bot_unique hxy)).elim
induction x
· rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [hz, top_unique hxy]
induction y
· rw [ne_eq, coe_eq_zero] at hx0
rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [*]
simp only [*, if_false]
norm_cast at *
rw [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero hx0 hy0), NNReal.mul_rpow]
norm_cast
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) * y) ^ z = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z * (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z :=
mul_rpow_of_ne_top coe_ne_top coe_ne_top z
theorem prod_coe_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r = ((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← coe_mul_rpow, coe_mul]
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
theorem mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
simp [hz.not_lt, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
theorem prod_rpow_of_ne_top {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi ih =>
have h2f : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞ := fun i hi ↦ hf i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi
rw [prod_insert hi, prod_insert hi, ih h2f, ← mul_rpow_of_ne_top <| hf i <| mem_insert_self ..]
apply prod_ne_top h2f
theorem prod_rpow_of_nonneg {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hr]
|
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy); · simp only [rpow_zero, inv_one]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 694 | 696 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.html). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `HasDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
- `HasStrictDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability, i.e.,
`f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o (y - z)` as `y, z → x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `derivWithin f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `derivWithin f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderivWithin_derivWithin` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps (in `Linear.lean`)
- addition (in `Add.lean`)
- sum of finitely many functions (in `Add.lean`)
- negation (in `Add.lean`)
- subtraction (in `Add.lean`)
- star (in `Star.lean`)
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Mul.lean`)
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E` (in `Mul.lean`)
- powers of a function (in `Pow.lean` and `ZPow.lean`)
- inverse `x → x⁻¹` (in `Inv.lean`)
- division (in `Inv.lean`)
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Comp.lean`)
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F` (in `Comp.lean`)
- inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `Inverse.lean`)
- polynomials (in `Polynomial.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
We set up the simplifier so that it can compute the derivative of simple functions. For instance,
```lean
example (x : ℝ) :
deriv (fun x ↦ cos (sin x) * exp x) x = (cos (sin x) - sin (sin x) * cos x) * exp x := by
simp; ring
```
The relationship between the derivative of a function and its definition from a standard
undergraduate course as the limit of the slope `(f y - f x) / (y - x)` as `y` tends to `𝓝[≠] x`
is developed in the file `Slope.lean`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
The strategy to construct simp lemmas that give the simplifier the possibility to compute
derivatives is the same as the one for differentiability statements, as explained in
`FDeriv/Basic.lean`. See the explanations there.
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
section
variable [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def HasDerivAtFilter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : Filter 𝕜) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x L
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def HasDerivWithinAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def HasDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability.
That is, `f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. -/
def HasStrictDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x
end
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • derivWithin f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def derivWithin (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x 1
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderiv 𝕜 f x 1
variable {f f₀ f₁ : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section
variable [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L` in terms of `HasDerivAtFilter` -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L := by simp [HasDerivAtFilter]
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L → HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter.mp
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
/-- Expressing `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasFDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt.mp
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt.mp
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasDerivAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt.mp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x := by
simp [HasStrictDerivAt, HasStrictFDerivAt]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x → HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt.mp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt :
HasStrictDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasFDerivAt` -/
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
end
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h]
simp
theorem differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero (h : derivWithin f s x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
not_imp_comm.1 derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
end TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt (h : ¬UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 :=
derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt <| mt AccPt.uniqueDiffWithinAt h
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 := by
unfold deriv
rw [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h]
simp
theorem differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h : deriv f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
not_imp_comm.1 deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv (s : Set 𝕜) (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h₁ : HasDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq H h h₁
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' : 𝕜 => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) L (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
(fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
suffices AntilipschitzWith ‖f'‖₊⁻¹ (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') from hf.isBigO_sub_rev this
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') fun x => by
simp [norm_smul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 hf')]
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivAt f f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set 𝕜} (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set, _⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {x}) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iio x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iic x) x := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio, HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo [LinearOrder 𝕜] [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {x y : 𝕜} (h : x < y) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioo x y) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter <| Iio_mem_nhds h
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi⟩ := HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h => f (x + h) - f x - h • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.mono h hst
|
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic.lean | 342 | 344 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
import Mathlib.Tactic.MkIffOfInductiveProp
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.Unbundled
/-!
# Relation closures
This file defines the reflexive, transitive, reflexive transitive and equivalence closures
of relations and proves some basic results on them.
Note that this is about unbundled relations, that is terms of types of the form `α → β → Prop`. For
the bundled version, see `Rel`.
## Definitions
* `Relation.ReflGen`: Reflexive closure. `ReflGen r` relates everything `r` related, plus for all
`a` it relates `a` with itself. So `ReflGen r a b ↔ r a b ∨ a = b`.
* `Relation.TransGen`: Transitive closure. `TransGen r` relates everything `r` related
transitively. So `TransGen r a b ↔ ∃ x₀ ... xₙ, r a x₀ ∧ r x₀ x₁ ∧ ... ∧ r xₙ b`.
* `Relation.ReflTransGen`: Reflexive transitive closure. `ReflTransGen r` relates everything
`r` related transitively, plus for all `a` it relates `a` with itself. So
`ReflTransGen r a b ↔ (∃ x₀ ... xₙ, r a x₀ ∧ r x₀ x₁ ∧ ... ∧ r xₙ b) ∨ a = b`. It is the same as
the reflexive closure of the transitive closure, or the transitive closure of the reflexive
closure. In terms of rewriting systems, this means that `a` can be rewritten to `b` in a number of
rewrites.
* `Relation.EqvGen`: Equivalence closure. `EqvGen r` relates everything `ReflTransGen r` relates,
plus for all related pairs it relates them in the opposite order.
* `Relation.Comp`: Relation composition. We provide notation `∘r`. For `r : α → β → Prop` and
`s : β → γ → Prop`, `r ∘r s`relates `a : α` and `c : γ` iff there exists `b : β` that's related to
both.
* `Relation.Map`: Image of a relation under a pair of maps. For `r : α → β → Prop`, `f : α → γ`,
`g : β → δ`, `Map r f g` is the relation `γ → δ → Prop` relating `f a` and `g b` for all `a`, `b`
related by `r`.
* `Relation.Join`: Join of a relation. For `r : α → α → Prop`, `Join r a b ↔ ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c`. In
terms of rewriting systems, this means that `a` and `b` can be rewritten to the same term.
-/
open Function
variable {α β γ δ ε ζ : Type*}
section NeImp
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
theorem IsRefl.reflexive [IsRefl α r] : Reflexive r := fun x ↦ IsRefl.refl x
/-- To show a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
it suffices to show it holds when `x ≠ y`. -/
theorem Reflexive.rel_of_ne_imp (h : Reflexive r) {x y : α} (hr : x ≠ y → r x y) : r x y := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· exact hxy ▸ h x
· exact hr hxy
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. -/
theorem Reflexive.ne_imp_iff (h : Reflexive r) {x y : α} : x ≠ y → r x y ↔ r x y :=
⟨h.rel_of_ne_imp, fun hr _ ↦ hr⟩
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. Unlike `Reflexive.ne_imp_iff`, this uses `[IsRefl α r]`. -/
theorem reflexive_ne_imp_iff [IsRefl α r] {x y : α} : x ≠ y → r x y ↔ r x y :=
IsRefl.reflexive.ne_imp_iff
protected theorem Symmetric.iff (H : Symmetric r) (x y : α) : r x y ↔ r y x :=
⟨fun h ↦ H h, fun h ↦ H h⟩
theorem Symmetric.flip_eq (h : Symmetric r) : flip r = r :=
funext₂ fun _ _ ↦ propext <| h.iff _ _
theorem Symmetric.swap_eq : Symmetric r → swap r = r :=
Symmetric.flip_eq
theorem flip_eq_iff : flip r = r ↔ Symmetric r :=
⟨fun h _ _ ↦ (congr_fun₂ h _ _).mp, Symmetric.flip_eq⟩
theorem swap_eq_iff : swap r = r ↔ Symmetric r :=
flip_eq_iff
end NeImp
section Comap
variable {r : β → β → Prop}
theorem Reflexive.comap (h : Reflexive r) (f : α → β) : Reflexive (r on f) := fun a ↦ h (f a)
theorem Symmetric.comap (h : Symmetric r) (f : α → β) : Symmetric (r on f) := fun _ _ hab ↦ h hab
theorem Transitive.comap (h : Transitive r) (f : α → β) : Transitive (r on f) :=
fun _ _ _ hab hbc ↦ h hab hbc
theorem Equivalence.comap (h : Equivalence r) (f : α → β) : Equivalence (r on f) :=
⟨fun a ↦ h.refl (f a), h.symm, h.trans⟩
end Comap
namespace Relation
section Comp
variable {r : α → β → Prop} {p : β → γ → Prop} {q : γ → δ → Prop}
/-- The composition of two relations, yielding a new relation. The result
relates a term of `α` and a term of `γ` if there is an intermediate
term of `β` related to both.
-/
def Comp (r : α → β → Prop) (p : β → γ → Prop) (a : α) (c : γ) : Prop :=
∃ b, r a b ∧ p b c
@[inherit_doc]
local infixr:80 " ∘r " => Relation.Comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq_fun (f : γ → β) : r ∘r (· = f ·) = (r · <| f ·) := by
ext x y
simp [Comp]
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq : r ∘r (· = ·) = r := comp_eq_fun ..
@[simp]
theorem fun_eq_comp (f : γ → α) : (f · = ·) ∘r r = (r <| f ·) := by
ext x y
simp [Comp]
@[simp]
theorem eq_comp : (· = ·) ∘r r = r := fun_eq_comp ..
@[simp]
theorem iff_comp {r : Prop → α → Prop} : (· ↔ ·) ∘r r = r := by
have : (· ↔ ·) = (· = ·) := by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq
rw [this, eq_comp]
@[simp]
theorem comp_iff {r : α → Prop → Prop} : r ∘r (· ↔ ·) = r := by
have : (· ↔ ·) = (· = ·) := by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq
rw [this, comp_eq]
theorem comp_assoc : (r ∘r p) ∘r q = r ∘r p ∘r q := by
funext a d
apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩ ↦ ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩
theorem flip_comp : flip (r ∘r p) = flip p ∘r flip r := by
funext c a
apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩
end Comp
section Fibration
|
variable (rα : α → α → Prop) (rβ : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β)
/-- A function `f : α → β` is a fibration between the relation `rα` and `rβ` if for all
`a : α` and `b : β`, whenever `b : β` and `f a` are related by `rβ`, `b` is the image
of some `a' : α` under `f`, and `a'` and `a` are related by `rα`. -/
| Mathlib/Logic/Relation.lean | 167 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
/-!
# Dilations
We define dilations, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that satisfy
`edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y` for some `r ∉ {0, ∞}`.
The value `r = 0` is not allowed because we want dilations of (e)metric spaces to be automatically
injective. The value `r = ∞` is not allowed because this way we can define `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0`,
not `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0∞`. Also, we do not often need maps sending distinct points to points at
infinite distance.
## Main definitions
* `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0`: the value of `r` in the relation above, defaulting to 1 in the case
where it is not well-defined.
## Notation
- `α →ᵈ β`: notation for `Dilation α β`.
## Implementation notes
The type of dilations defined in this file are also referred to as "similarities" or "similitudes"
by other authors. The name `Dilation` was chosen to match the Wikipedia name.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoEMetricSpace` and we specialize to `PseudoMetricSpace` and `MetricSpace` when
needed.
## TODO
- Introduce dilation equivs.
- Refactor the `Isometry` API to match the `*HomClass` API below.
## References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilation_(metric_space)
- [Marcel Berger, *Geometry*][berger1987]
-/
noncomputable section
open Bornology Function Set Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
section Defs
variable (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
/-- A dilation is a map that uniformly scales the edistance between any two points. -/
structure Dilation where
toFun : α → β
edist_eq' : ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, edist (toFun x) (toFun y) = r * edist x y
@[inherit_doc] infixl:25 " →ᵈ " => Dilation
/-- `DilationClass F α β r` states that `F` is a type of `r`-dilations.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `Dilation`. -/
class DilationClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] : Prop where
edist_eq' : ∀ f : F, ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y
end Defs
namespace Dilation
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {F : Type*}
section Setup
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
instance funLike : FunLike (α →ᵈ β) α β where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance toDilationClass : DilationClass (α →ᵈ β) α β where
edist_eq' f := edist_eq' f
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : α →ᵈ β} : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → β) (h) : ⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : α →ᵈ β) = f :=
rfl
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : α →ᵈ β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
protected theorem congr_arg (f : α →ᵈ β) {x y : α} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ᵈ β} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : α →ᵈ β) (h) : Dilation.mk f h = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Copy of a `Dilation` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
protected def copy (f : α →ᵈ β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = ⇑f) : α →ᵈ β where
toFun := f'
edist_eq' := h.symm ▸ f.edist_eq'
theorem copy_eq_self (f : α →ᵈ β) {f' : α → β} (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable [FunLike F α β]
open Classical in
/-- The ratio of a dilation `f`. If the ratio is undefined (i.e., the distance between any two
points in `α` is either zero or infinity), then we choose one as the ratio. -/
def ratio [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ℝ≥0 :=
if ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ⊤ then 1 else (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose
theorem ratio_of_trivial [DilationClass F α β] (f : F)
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ∞) : ratio f = 1 :=
if_pos h
@[nontriviality]
theorem ratio_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ratio f = 1 :=
if_pos fun x y ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x y]
theorem ratio_ne_zero [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ratio f ≠ 0 := by
rw [ratio]; split_ifs
· exact one_ne_zero
exact (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose_spec.1
theorem ratio_pos [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : 0 < ratio f :=
(ratio_ne_zero f).bot_lt
@[simp]
theorem edist_eq [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
edist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * edist x y := by
rw [ratio]; split_ifs with key
· rcases DilationClass.edist_eq' f with ⟨r, hne, hr⟩
replace hr := hr x y
rcases key x y with h | h
· simp only [hr, h, mul_zero]
· simp [hr, h, hne]
exact (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose_spec.2 x y
@[simp]
theorem nndist_eq {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [FunLike F α β]
[DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
nndist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * nndist x y := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ← edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_mul, edist_eq]
@[simp]
theorem dist_eq {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [FunLike F α β]
[DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
dist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * dist x y := by
simp only [dist_nndist, nndist_eq, NNReal.coe_mul]
/-- The `ratio` is equal to the distance ratio for any two points with nonzero finite distance.
`dist` and `nndist` versions below -/
theorem ratio_unique [DilationClass F α β] {f : F} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0} (h₀ : edist x y ≠ 0)
(htop : edist x y ≠ ⊤) (hr : edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y) : r = ratio f := by
simpa only [hr, ENNReal.mul_left_inj h₀ htop, ENNReal.coe_inj] using edist_eq f x y
/-- The `ratio` is equal to the distance ratio for any two points
with nonzero finite distance; `nndist` version -/
theorem ratio_unique_of_nndist_ne_zero {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] [DilationClass F α β] {f : F} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0} (hxy : nndist x y ≠ 0)
(hr : nndist (f x) (f y) = r * nndist x y) : r = ratio f :=
ratio_unique (by rwa [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_ne_zero]) (edist_ne_top x y)
(by rw [edist_nndist, edist_nndist, hr, ENNReal.coe_mul])
/-- The `ratio` is equal to the distance ratio for any two points
with nonzero finite distance; `dist` version -/
theorem ratio_unique_of_dist_ne_zero {α β} {F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] [DilationClass F α β] {f : F} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0} (hxy : dist x y ≠ 0)
(hr : dist (f x) (f y) = r * dist x y) : r = ratio f :=
ratio_unique_of_nndist_ne_zero (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.1 hxy) <|
NNReal.eq <| by rw [coe_nndist, hr, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_nndist]
/-- Alternative `Dilation` constructor when the distance hypothesis is over `nndist` -/
def mkOfNNDistEq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α → β)
(h : ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, nndist (f x) (f y) = r * nndist x y) : α →ᵈ β where
toFun := f
edist_eq' := by
rcases h with ⟨r, hne, h⟩
refine ⟨r, hne, fun x y => ?_⟩
rw [edist_nndist, edist_nndist, ← ENNReal.coe_mul, h x y]
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkOfNNDistEq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) (h) :
⇑(mkOfNNDistEq f h : α →ᵈ β) = f :=
rfl
| @[simp]
theorem mk_coe_of_nndist_eq {α β} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (f : α →ᵈ β)
(h) : Dilation.mkOfNNDistEq f h = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Dilation.lean | 205 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
/-!
# Graph cliques
This file defines cliques in simple graphs.
A clique is a set of vertices that are pairwise adjacent.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.IsClique`: Predicate for a set of vertices to be a clique.
* `SimpleGraph.IsNClique`: Predicate for a set of vertices to be an `n`-clique.
* `SimpleGraph.cliqueFinset`: Finset of `n`-cliques of a graph.
* `SimpleGraph.CliqueFree`: Predicate for a graph to have no `n`-cliques.
-/
open Finset Fintype Function SimpleGraph.Walk
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {α β : Type*} (G H : SimpleGraph α)
/-! ### Cliques -/
section Clique
variable {s t : Set α}
/-- A clique in a graph is a set of vertices that are pairwise adjacent. -/
abbrev IsClique (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Pairwise G.Adj
theorem isClique_iff : G.IsClique s ↔ s.Pairwise G.Adj :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A clique is a set of vertices whose induced graph is complete. -/
theorem isClique_iff_induce_eq : G.IsClique s ↔ G.induce s = ⊤ := by
rw [isClique_iff]
constructor
· intro h
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [comap_adj, Subtype.coe_mk, top_adj, Ne, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact ⟨Adj.ne, h hv hw⟩
· intro h v hv w hw hne
have h2 : (G.induce s).Adj ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ = _ := rfl
conv_lhs at h2 => rw [h]
simp only [top_adj, ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, eq_iff_iff] at h2
exact h2.1 hne
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {s : Finset α} : Decidable (G.IsClique s) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ G.isClique_iff
variable {G H} {a b : α}
lemma isClique_empty : G.IsClique ∅ := by simp
lemma isClique_singleton (a : α) : G.IsClique {a} := by simp
theorem IsClique.of_subsingleton {G : SimpleGraph α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : G.IsClique s :=
hs.pairwise G.Adj
lemma isClique_pair : G.IsClique {a, b} ↔ a ≠ b → G.Adj a b := Set.pairwise_pair_of_symmetric G.symm
@[simp]
lemma isClique_insert : G.IsClique (insert a s) ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → G.Adj a b :=
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric G.symm
lemma isClique_insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) :
G.IsClique (insert a s) ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, G.Adj a b :=
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem G.symm ha
lemma IsClique.insert (hs : G.IsClique s) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → G.Adj a b) :
G.IsClique (insert a s) := hs.insert_of_symmetric G.symm h
theorem IsClique.mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.IsClique s → H.IsClique s := Set.Pairwise.mono' h
theorem IsClique.subset (h : t ⊆ s) : G.IsClique s → G.IsClique t := Set.Pairwise.mono h
@[simp]
theorem isClique_bot_iff : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).IsClique s ↔ (s : Set α).Subsingleton :=
Set.pairwise_bot_iff
alias ⟨IsClique.subsingleton, _⟩ := isClique_bot_iff
protected theorem IsClique.map (h : G.IsClique s) {f : α ↪ β} : (G.map f).IsClique (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ hab
exact ⟨a, b, h ha hb <| ne_of_apply_ne _ hab, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem isClique_map_iff_of_nontrivial {f : α ↪ β} {t : Set β} (ht : t.Nontrivial) :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ ∃ (s : Set α), G.IsClique s ∧ f '' s = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ?_, ?_⟩, by rintro ⟨x, hs, rfl⟩; exact hs.map⟩
· rintro x (hx : f x ∈ t) y (hy : f y ∈ t) hne
obtain ⟨u,v, huv, hux, hvy⟩ := h hx hy (by simpa)
rw [EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq] at hux hvy
rwa [← hux, ← hvy]
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_iff]
intro x hxt
obtain ⟨y,hyt, hyne⟩ := ht.exists_ne x
obtain ⟨u,v, -, rfl, rfl⟩ := h hyt hxt hyne
exact Set.mem_range_self _
theorem isClique_map_iff {f : α ↪ β} {t : Set β} :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ t.Subsingleton ∨ ∃ (s : Set α), G.IsClique s ∧ f '' s = t := by
obtain (ht | ht) := t.subsingleton_or_nontrivial
· simp [IsClique.of_subsingleton, ht]
simp [isClique_map_iff_of_nontrivial ht, ht.not_subsingleton]
@[simp] theorem isClique_map_image_iff {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsClique (f '' s) ↔ G.IsClique s := by
rw [isClique_map_iff, f.injective.subsingleton_image_iff]
obtain (hs | hs) := s.subsingleton_or_nontrivial
· simp [hs, IsClique.of_subsingleton]
simp [or_iff_right hs.not_subsingleton, Set.image_eq_image f.injective]
variable {f : α ↪ β} {t : Finset β}
theorem isClique_map_finset_iff_of_nontrivial (ht : t.Nontrivial) :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ ∃ (s : Finset α), G.IsClique s ∧ s.map f = t := by
constructor
· rw [isClique_map_iff_of_nontrivial (by simpa)]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hst⟩
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Set.Finite.exists_finset_coe <|
(show s.Finite from Set.Finite.of_finite_image (by simp [hst]) f.injective.injOn)
exact ⟨s,hs, Finset.coe_inj.1 (by simpa)⟩
rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
simpa using hs.map (f := f)
theorem isClique_map_finset_iff :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ #t ≤ 1 ∨ ∃ (s : Finset α), G.IsClique s ∧ s.map f = t := by
obtain (ht | ht) := le_or_lt #t 1
· simp only [ht, true_or, iff_true]
exact IsClique.of_subsingleton <| card_le_one.1 ht
rw [isClique_map_finset_iff_of_nontrivial, ← not_lt]
· simp [ht, Finset.map_eq_image]
exact Finset.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mp ht
protected theorem IsClique.finsetMap {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} (h : G.IsClique s) :
(G.map f).IsClique (s.map f) := by
simpa
/-- If a set of vertices `A` is a clique in subgraph of `G` induced by a superset of `A`,
its embedding is a clique in `G`. -/
theorem IsClique.of_induce {S : Subgraph G} {F : Set α} {A : Set F}
(c : (S.induce F).coe.IsClique A) : G.IsClique (Subtype.val '' A) := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
intro _ ⟨_, ainA⟩ _ ⟨_, binA⟩ anb
exact S.adj_sub (c ainA binA (Subtype.coe_ne_coe.mp anb)).2.2
lemma IsClique.sdiff_of_sup_edge {v w : α} {s : Set α} (hc : (G ⊔ edge v w).IsClique s) :
G.IsClique (s \ {v}) := by
intro _ hx _ hy hxy
have := hc hx.1 hy.1 hxy
simp_all [sup_adj, edge_adj]
lemma isClique_sup_edge_of_ne_sdiff {v w : α} {s : Set α} (h : v ≠ w ) (hv : G.IsClique (s \ {v}))
(hw : G.IsClique (s \ {w})) : (G ⊔ edge v w).IsClique s := by
intro x hx y hy hxy
by_cases h' : x ∈ s \ {v} ∧ y ∈ s \ {v} ∨ x ∈ s \ {w} ∧ y ∈ s \ {w}
· obtain (⟨hx, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, hy⟩) := h'
· exact hv.mono le_sup_left hx hy hxy
· exact hw.mono le_sup_left hx hy hxy
· exact Or.inr ⟨by by_cases x = v <;> aesop, hxy⟩
lemma isClique_sup_edge_of_ne_iff {v w : α} {s : Set α} (h : v ≠ w) :
(G ⊔ edge v w).IsClique s ↔ G.IsClique (s \ {v}) ∧ G.IsClique (s \ {w}) :=
⟨fun h' ↦ ⟨h'.sdiff_of_sup_edge, (edge_comm .. ▸ h').sdiff_of_sup_edge⟩,
fun h' ↦ isClique_sup_edge_of_ne_sdiff h h'.1 h'.2⟩
end Clique
/-! ### `n`-cliques -/
section NClique
variable {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α}
/-- An `n`-clique in a graph is a set of `n` vertices which are pairwise connected. -/
structure IsNClique (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) : Prop where
isClique : G.IsClique s
card_eq : #s = n
theorem isNClique_iff : G.IsNClique n s ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ #s = n :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} :
Decidable (G.IsNClique n s) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ G.isNClique_iff
variable {G H} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma isNClique_empty : G.IsNClique n ∅ ↔ n = 0 := by simp [isNClique_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
lemma isNClique_singleton : G.IsNClique n {a} ↔ n = 1 := by simp [isNClique_iff, eq_comm]
theorem IsNClique.mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.IsNClique n s → H.IsNClique n s := by
simp_rw [isNClique_iff]
exact And.imp_left (IsClique.mono h)
protected theorem IsNClique.map (h : G.IsNClique n s) {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsNClique n (s.map f) :=
⟨by rw [coe_map]; exact h.1.map, (card_map _).trans h.2⟩
theorem isNClique_map_iff (hn : 1 < n) {t : Finset β} {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsNClique n t ↔ ∃ s : Finset α, G.IsNClique n s ∧ s.map f = t := by
rw [isNClique_iff, isClique_map_finset_iff, or_and_right,
or_iff_right (by rintro ⟨h', rfl⟩; exact h'.not_lt hn)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp [isNClique_iff, hs]
rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
simp [hs.card_eq, hs.isClique]
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_bot_iff : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).IsNClique n s ↔ n ≤ 1 ∧ #s = n := by
rw [isNClique_iff, isClique_bot_iff]
refine and_congr_left ?_
rintro rfl
exact card_le_one.symm
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_zero : G.IsNClique 0 s ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, Finset.card_eq_zero, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; rintro rfl; simp
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_one : G.IsNClique 1 s ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, card_eq_one, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; simp
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
protected theorem IsNClique.insert (hs : G.IsNClique n s) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, G.Adj a b) :
G.IsNClique (n + 1) (insert a s) := by
constructor
· push_cast
exact hs.1.insert fun b hb _ => h _ hb
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem fun ha => (h _ ha).ne rfl, hs.2]
lemma IsNClique.erase_of_mem (hs : G.IsNClique n s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
G.IsNClique (n - 1) (s.erase a) where
isClique := hs.isClique.subset <| by simp
card_eq := by rw [card_erase_of_mem ha, hs.2]
protected lemma IsNClique.insert_erase
(hs : G.IsNClique n s) (ha : ∀ w ∈ s \ {b}, G.Adj a w) (hb : b ∈ s) :
G.IsNClique n (insert a (erase s b)) := by
cases n with
| zero => exact False.elim <| not_mem_empty _ (isNClique_zero.1 hs ▸ hb)
| succ _ => exact (hs.erase_of_mem hb).insert fun w h ↦ by aesop
theorem is3Clique_triple_iff : G.IsNClique 3 {a, b, c} ↔ G.Adj a b ∧ G.Adj a c ∧ G.Adj b c := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, isClique_iff, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric G.symm, coe_insert]
by_cases hab : a = b <;> by_cases hbc : b = c <;> by_cases hac : a = c <;> subst_vars <;>
simp [G.ne_of_adj, and_rotate, *]
theorem is3Clique_iff :
G.IsNClique 3 s ↔ ∃ a b c, G.Adj a b ∧ G.Adj a c ∧ G.Adj b c ∧ s = {a, b, c} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, b, c, -, -, -, hs⟩ := card_eq_three.1 h.card_eq
refine ⟨a, b, c, ?_⟩
rwa [hs, eq_self_iff_true, and_true, is3Clique_triple_iff.symm, ← hs]
· rintro ⟨a, b, c, hab, hbc, hca, rfl⟩
exact is3Clique_triple_iff.2 ⟨hab, hbc, hca⟩
end DecidableEq
theorem is3Clique_iff_exists_cycle_length_three :
(∃ s : Finset α, G.IsNClique 3 s) ↔ ∃ (u : α) (w : G.Walk u u), w.IsCycle ∧ w.length = 3 := by
classical
simp_rw [is3Clique_iff, isCycle_def]
exact
⟨(fun ⟨_, a, _, _, hab, hac, hbc, _⟩ => ⟨a, cons hab (cons hbc (cons hac.symm nil)), by aesop⟩),
(fun ⟨_, .cons hab (.cons hbc (.cons hca nil)), _, _⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, _, hab, hca.symm, hbc, rfl⟩)⟩
/-- If a set of vertices `A` is an `n`-clique in subgraph of `G` induced by a superset of `A`,
its embedding is an `n`-clique in `G`. -/
theorem IsNClique.of_induce {S : Subgraph G} {F : Set α} {s : Finset { x // x ∈ F }} {n : ℕ}
(cc : (S.induce F).coe.IsNClique n s) :
G.IsNClique n (Finset.map ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩ s) := by
rw [isNClique_iff] at cc ⊢
simp only [Subgraph.induce_verts, coe_map, card_map]
exact ⟨cc.left.of_induce, cc.right⟩
lemma IsNClique.erase_of_sup_edge_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {v w : α} {s : Finset α} {n : ℕ}
(hc : (G ⊔ edge v w).IsNClique n s) (hx : v ∈ s) : G.IsNClique (n - 1) (s.erase v) where
isClique := coe_erase v _ ▸ hc.1.sdiff_of_sup_edge
card_eq := by rw [card_erase_of_mem hx, hc.2]
end NClique
/-! ### Graphs without cliques -/
section CliqueFree
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- `G.CliqueFree n` means that `G` has no `n`-cliques. -/
def CliqueFree (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ t, ¬G.IsNClique n t
variable {G H} {s : Finset α}
theorem IsNClique.not_cliqueFree (hG : G.IsNClique n s) : ¬G.CliqueFree n :=
fun h ↦ h _ hG
theorem not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding {n : ℕ} (f : (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G) :
¬G.CliqueFree n := by
simp only [CliqueFree, isNClique_iff, isClique_iff_induce_eq, not_forall, Classical.not_not]
use Finset.univ.map f.toEmbedding
simp only [card_map, Finset.card_fin, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [coe_map, Set.mem_image, coe_univ, Set.mem_univ, true_and] at hv hw
obtain ⟨v', rfl⟩ := hv
obtain ⟨w', rfl⟩ := hw
simp_rw [RelEmbedding.coe_toEmbedding, comap_adj, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, f.map_adj_iff,
top_adj, ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, RelEmbedding.inj]
/-- An embedding of a complete graph that witnesses the fact that the graph is not clique-free. -/
noncomputable def topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree {n : ℕ} (h : ¬G.CliqueFree n) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G := by
simp only [CliqueFree, isNClique_iff, isClique_iff_induce_eq, not_forall, Classical.not_not] at h
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := h.choose_spec
have : (⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin #h.choose)) ≃g (⊤ : SimpleGraph h.choose) := by
apply Iso.completeGraph
simpa using (Fintype.equivFin h.choose).symm
rw [← ha] at this
convert (Embedding.induce ↑h.choose.toSet).comp this.toEmbedding
exact hb.symm
theorem not_cliqueFree_iff (n : ℕ) : ¬G.CliqueFree n ↔ Nonempty ((⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree h⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding f⟩
theorem cliqueFree_iff {n : ℕ} : G.CliqueFree n ↔ IsEmpty ((⊤ : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) ↪g G) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_cliqueFree_iff, not_isEmpty_iff]
theorem not_cliqueFree_card_of_top_embedding [Fintype α] (f : (⊤ : SimpleGraph α) ↪g G) :
¬G.CliqueFree (card α) := by
rw [not_cliqueFree_iff]
exact ⟨(Iso.completeGraph (Fintype.equivFin α)).symm.toEmbedding.trans f⟩
@[simp] lemma not_cliqueFree_zero : ¬ G.CliqueFree 0 :=
fun h ↦ h ∅ <| isNClique_empty.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem cliqueFree_bot (h : 2 ≤ n) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).CliqueFree n := by
intro t ht
have := le_trans h (isNClique_bot_iff.1 ht).1
contradiction
theorem CliqueFree.mono (h : m ≤ n) : G.CliqueFree m → G.CliqueFree n := by
intro hG s hs
obtain ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := exists_subset_card_eq (h.trans hs.card_eq.ge)
exact hG _ ⟨hs.isClique.subset hts, ht⟩
theorem CliqueFree.anti (h : G ≤ H) : H.CliqueFree n → G.CliqueFree n :=
forall_imp fun _ ↦ mt <| IsNClique.mono h
/-- If a graph is cliquefree, any graph that embeds into it is also cliquefree. -/
theorem CliqueFree.comap {H : SimpleGraph β} (f : H ↪g G) : G.CliqueFree n → H.CliqueFree n := by
intro h; contrapose h
exact not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding <| f.comp (topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree h)
@[simp] theorem cliqueFree_map_iff {f : α ↪ β} [Nonempty α] :
(G.map f).CliqueFree n ↔ G.CliqueFree n := by
obtain (hle | hlt) := le_or_lt n 1
· obtain (rfl | rfl) := Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 hle
· simp [CliqueFree]
simp [CliqueFree, show ∃ (_ : β), True from ⟨f (Classical.arbitrary _), trivial⟩]
simp [CliqueFree, isNClique_map_iff hlt]
/-- See `SimpleGraph.cliqueFree_of_chromaticNumber_lt` for a tighter bound. -/
theorem cliqueFree_of_card_lt [Fintype α] (hc : card α < n) : G.CliqueFree n := by
by_contra h
refine Nat.lt_le_asymm hc ?_
rw [cliqueFree_iff, not_isEmpty_iff] at h
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin] using Fintype.card_le_of_embedding h.some.toEmbedding
/-- A complete `r`-partite graph has no `n`-cliques for `r < n`. -/
theorem cliqueFree_completeMultipartiteGraph {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (V : ι → Type*)
(hc : card ι < n) : (completeMultipartiteGraph V).CliqueFree n := by
rw [cliqueFree_iff, isEmpty_iff]
intro f
obtain ⟨v, w, hn, he⟩ := exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt (Sigma.fst ∘ f) (by simp [hc])
rw [← top_adj, ← f.map_adj_iff, comap_adj, top_adj] at hn
exact absurd he hn
namespace completeMultipartiteGraph
variable {ι : Type*} (V : ι → Type*)
/-- Embedding of the complete graph on `ι` into `completeMultipartiteGraph` on `ι` nonempty parts -/
@[simps]
def topEmbedding (f : ∀ (i : ι), V i) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph ι) ↪g completeMultipartiteGraph V where
toFun := fun i ↦ ⟨i, f i⟩
inj' := fun _ _ h ↦ (Sigma.mk.inj_iff.1 h).1
map_rel_iff' := by simp
theorem not_cliqueFree_of_le_card [Fintype ι] (f : ∀ (i : ι), V i) (hc : n ≤ Fintype.card ι) :
¬ (completeMultipartiteGraph V).CliqueFree n :=
fun hf ↦ (cliqueFree_iff.1 <| hf.mono hc).elim' <|
(topEmbedding V f).comp (Iso.completeGraph (Fintype.equivFin ι).symm).toEmbedding
theorem not_cliqueFree_of_infinite [Infinite ι] (f : ∀ (i : ι), V i) :
¬ (completeMultipartiteGraph V).CliqueFree n :=
fun hf ↦ not_cliqueFree_of_top_embedding (topEmbedding V f |>.comp
<| Embedding.completeGraph <| Fin.valEmbedding.trans <| Infinite.natEmbedding ι) hf
theorem not_cliqueFree_of_le_enatCard (f : ∀ (i : ι), V i) (hc : n ≤ ENat.card ι) :
¬ (completeMultipartiteGraph V).CliqueFree n := by
by_cases h : Infinite ι
· exact not_cliqueFree_of_infinite V f
· have : Fintype ι := fintypeOfNotInfinite h
rw [ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Nat.cast_le] at hc
exact not_cliqueFree_of_le_card V f hc
end completeMultipartiteGraph
/-- Clique-freeness is preserved by `replaceVertex`. -/
protected theorem CliqueFree.replaceVertex [DecidableEq α] (h : G.CliqueFree n) (s t : α) :
(G.replaceVertex s t).CliqueFree n := by
contrapose h
obtain ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := topEmbeddingOfNotCliqueFree h
rw [not_cliqueFree_iff]
by_cases mt : t ∈ Set.range φ
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := mt
by_cases ms : s ∈ Set.range φ
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := ms
have e := @hφ x y
simp_rw [hx, hy, adj_comm, not_adj_replaceVertex_same, top_adj, false_iff, not_ne_iff] at e
rwa [← hx, e, hy, replaceVertex_self, not_cliqueFree_iff] at h
· unfold replaceVertex at hφ
use φ.setValue x s
intro a b
simp only [Embedding.coeFn_mk, Embedding.setValue, not_exists.mp ms, ite_false]
rw [apply_ite (G.Adj · _), apply_ite (G.Adj _ ·), apply_ite (G.Adj _ ·)]
convert @hφ a b <;> simp only [← φ.apply_eq_iff_eq, SimpleGraph.irrefl, hx]
· use φ
simp_rw [Set.mem_range, not_exists, ← ne_eq] at mt
conv at hφ => enter [a, b]; rw [G.adj_replaceVertex_iff_of_ne _ (mt a) (mt b)]
exact hφ
@[simp]
lemma cliqueFree_one : G.CliqueFree 1 ↔ IsEmpty α := by
simp [CliqueFree, isEmpty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cliqueFree_two : G.CliqueFree 2 ↔ G = ⊥ := by
classical
constructor
· simp_rw [← edgeSet_eq_empty, Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, Sym2.forall, mem_edgeSet]
exact fun h a b hab => h _ ⟨by simpa [hab.ne], card_pair hab.ne⟩
· rintro rfl
exact cliqueFree_bot le_rfl
lemma CliqueFree.mem_of_sup_edge_isNClique {x y : α} {t : Finset α} {n : ℕ} (h : G.CliqueFree n)
(hc : (G ⊔ edge x y).IsNClique n t) : x ∈ t := by
by_contra! hf
have ht : (t : Set α) \ {x} = t := sdiff_eq_left.mpr <| Set.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr hf
exact h t ⟨ht ▸ hc.1.sdiff_of_sup_edge, hc.2⟩
open Classical in
/-- Adding an edge increases the clique number by at most one. -/
protected theorem CliqueFree.sup_edge (h : G.CliqueFree n) (v w : α) :
(G ⊔ edge v w).CliqueFree (n + 1) :=
fun _ hs ↦ (hs.erase_of_sup_edge_of_mem <|
(h.mono n.le_succ).mem_of_sup_edge_isNClique hs).not_cliqueFree h
end CliqueFree
section CliqueFreeOn
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
/-- `G.CliqueFreeOn s n` means that `G` has no `n`-cliques contained in `s`. -/
def CliqueFreeOn (G : SimpleGraph α) (s : Set α) (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃t⦄, ↑t ⊆ s → ¬G.IsNClique n t
theorem CliqueFreeOn.subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : G.CliqueFreeOn s₂ n) : G.CliqueFreeOn s₁ n :=
fun _t hts => h₂ <| hts.trans hs
theorem CliqueFreeOn.mono (hmn : m ≤ n) (hG : G.CliqueFreeOn s m) : G.CliqueFreeOn s n := by
rintro t hts ht
obtain ⟨u, hut, hu⟩ := exists_subset_card_eq (hmn.trans ht.card_eq.ge)
exact hG ((coe_subset.2 hut).trans hts) ⟨ht.isClique.subset hut, hu⟩
theorem CliqueFreeOn.anti (hGH : G ≤ H) (hH : H.CliqueFreeOn s n) : G.CliqueFreeOn s n :=
fun _t hts ht => hH hts <| ht.mono hGH
@[simp]
theorem cliqueFreeOn_empty : G.CliqueFreeOn ∅ n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
simp [CliqueFreeOn, Set.subset_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cliqueFreeOn_singleton : G.CliqueFreeOn {a} n ↔ 1 < n := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n <;>
simp [CliqueFreeOn, isNClique_iff, ← subset_singleton_iff', (Nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm]
@[simp]
theorem cliqueFreeOn_univ : G.CliqueFreeOn Set.univ n ↔ G.CliqueFree n := by
simp [CliqueFree, CliqueFreeOn]
| protected theorem CliqueFree.cliqueFreeOn (hG : G.CliqueFree n) : G.CliqueFreeOn s n :=
fun _t _ ↦ hG _
theorem cliqueFreeOn_of_card_lt {s : Finset α} (h : #s < n) : G.CliqueFreeOn s n :=
fun _t hts ht => h.not_le <| ht.2.symm.trans_le <| card_mono hts
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Clique.lean | 517 | 522 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
/-!
# Absolute values in ordered groups
The absolute value of an element in a group which is also a lattice is its supremum with its
negation. This generalizes the usual absolute value on real numbers (`|x| = max x (-x)`).
## Notations
- `|a|`: The *absolute value* of an element `a` of an additive lattice ordered group
- `|a|ₘ`: The *absolute value* of an element `a` of a multiplicative lattice ordered group
-/
open Function
variable {G : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_pow (n : ℕ) (a : G) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 1
· rw [mabs_of_le_one ha, ← mabs_inv, ← inv_pow, mabs_of_one_le]
exact one_le_pow_of_one_le' (one_le_inv'.2 ha) n
· rw [mabs_of_one_le ha, mabs_of_one_le (one_le_pow_of_one_le' ha n)]
@[to_additive] private lemma mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1 := by
obtain ha | ha := le_or_lt 1 a <;> obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt 1 b
· simp [ha, hb, mabs_of_one_le, one_le_mul ha hb]
· exact (lt_irrefl (1 : G) <| ha.trans_lt <| hab.trans_lt hb).elim
swap
· simp [ha.le, hb.le, mabs_of_le_one, mul_le_one', mul_comm]
have : (|a * b|ₘ = a⁻¹ * b ↔ b ≤ 1) ↔
(|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1) := by
simp [ha.le, ha.not_le, hb, mabs_of_le_one, mabs_of_one_le]
refine this.mp ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simp only [h.antisymm hb, mabs_of_lt_one ha, mul_one]⟩
obtain ab | ab := le_or_lt (a * b) 1
· refine (eq_one_of_inv_eq' ?_).le
rwa [mabs_of_le_one ab, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm, mul_right_inj] at h
· rw [mabs_of_one_lt ab, mul_left_inj] at h
rw [eq_one_of_inv_eq' h.symm] at ha
cases ha.false
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_iff (a b : G) :
|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1 := by
obtain ab | ab := le_total a b
· exact mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le ab
· simpa only [mul_comm, and_comm] using mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le ab
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_le : |a|ₘ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b := by rw [mabs_le', and_comm, inv_le']
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mabs' : a ≤ |b|ₘ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ ∨ a ≤ b := by rw [le_mabs, or_comm, le_inv']
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_of_mabs_le (h : |a|ₘ ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
(mabs_le.mp h).1
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mabs_le (h : |a|ₘ ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
(mabs_le.mp h).2
/-- The **triangle inequality** in `LinearOrderedCommGroup`s. -/
@[to_additive "The **triangle inequality** in `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`s."]
theorem mabs_mul (a b : G) : |a * b|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ := by
rw [mabs_le, mul_inv]
constructor <;> gcongr <;> apply_rules [inv_mabs_le, le_mabs_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mul' (a b : G) : |a|ₘ ≤ |b|ₘ * |b * a|ₘ := by simpa using mabs_mul b⁻¹ (b * a)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div (a b : G) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mabs_inv b]
exact mabs_mul a _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_iff : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c ↔ a / b ≤ c ∧ b / a ≤ c := by
rw [mabs_le, inv_le_div_iff_le_mul, div_le_iff_le_mul', and_comm, div_le_iff_le_mul']
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_lt_iff : |a / b|ₘ < c ↔ a / b < c ∧ b / a < c := by
rw [mabs_lt, inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul', div_lt_iff_lt_mul', and_comm, div_lt_iff_lt_mul']
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_of_mabs_div_le_left (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c) : b / c ≤ a :=
div_le_comm.1 <| (mabs_div_le_iff.1 h).2
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_of_mabs_div_le_right (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b :=
div_le_of_mabs_div_le_left (mabs_div_comm a b ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_left (h : |a / b|ₘ < c) : b / c < a :=
div_lt_comm.1 <| (mabs_div_lt_iff.1 h).2
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_right (h : |a / b|ₘ < c) : a / c < b :=
div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_left (mabs_div_comm a b ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div (a b : G) : |a|ₘ / |b|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ :=
div_le_iff_le_mul.2 <|
calc
|a|ₘ = |a / b * b|ₘ := by rw [div_mul_cancel]
_ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b|ₘ := mabs_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div (a b : G) : |(|a|ₘ / |b|ₘ)|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ :=
mabs_div_le_iff.2
⟨mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div _ _, by rw [mabs_div_comm]; apply mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div⟩
/-- `|a / b|ₘ ≤ n` if `1 ≤ a ≤ n` and `1 ≤ b ≤ n`. -/
@[to_additive "`|a - b| ≤ n` if `0 ≤ a ≤ n` and `0 ≤ b ≤ n`."]
theorem mabs_div_le_of_one_le_of_le {a b n : G} (one_le_a : 1 ≤ a) (a_le_n : a ≤ n)
(one_le_b : 1 ≤ b) (b_le_n : b ≤ n) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ n := by
rw [mabs_div_le_iff, div_le_iff_le_mul, div_le_iff_le_mul]
exact ⟨le_mul_of_le_of_one_le a_le_n one_le_b, le_mul_of_le_of_one_le b_le_n one_le_a⟩
/-- `|a - b| < n` if `0 ≤ a < n` and `0 ≤ b < n`. -/
@[to_additive "`|a / b|ₘ < n` if `1 ≤ a < n` and `1 ≤ b < n`."]
theorem mabs_div_lt_of_one_le_of_lt {a b n : G} (one_le_a : 1 ≤ a) (a_lt_n : a < n)
(one_le_b : 1 ≤ b) (b_lt_n : b < n) : |a / b|ₘ < n := by
rw [mabs_div_lt_iff, div_lt_iff_lt_mul, div_lt_iff_lt_mul]
exact ⟨lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le a_lt_n one_le_b, lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le b_lt_n one_le_a⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_eq (hb : 1 ≤ b) : |a|ₘ = b ↔ a = b ∨ a = b⁻¹ := by
refine ⟨eq_or_eq_inv_of_mabs_eq, ?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [mabs_inv, mabs_of_one_le hb]
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_le_max_mabs_mabs (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : |b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |c|ₘ :=
mabs_le'.2
⟨by simp [hbc.trans (le_mabs_self c)], by
simp [(inv_le_inv_iff.mpr hab).trans (inv_le_mabs a)]⟩
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem min_mabs_mabs_le_mabs_max : min |a|ₘ |b|ₘ ≤ |max a b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (min_le_right _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (max_eq_right h).symm)
fun h => (min_le_left _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (max_eq_left h).symm
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem min_mabs_mabs_le_mabs_min : min |a|ₘ |b|ₘ ≤ |min a b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (min_le_left _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (min_eq_left h).symm)
fun h => (min_le_right _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (min_eq_right h).symm
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_max_le_max_mabs_mabs : |max a b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (congr_arg _ <| max_eq_right h).trans_le <| le_max_right _ _)
fun h => (congr_arg _ <| max_eq_left h).trans_le <| le_max_left _ _
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_min_le_max_mabs_mabs : |min a b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (congr_arg _ <| min_eq_left h).trans_le <| le_max_left _ _) fun h =>
(congr_arg _ <| min_eq_right h).trans_le <| le_max_right _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_mabs_div_eq_one {a b : G} (h : |a / b|ₘ = 1) : a = b :=
div_eq_one.1 <| mabs_eq_one.1 h
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le (a b c : G) : |a / c|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b / c|ₘ :=
calc
|a / c|ₘ = |a / b * (b / c)|ₘ := by rw [div_mul_div_cancel]
_ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b / c|ₘ := mabs_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mul_three (a b c : G) : |a * b * c|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ * |c|ₘ :=
(mabs_mul _ _).trans (mul_le_mul_right' (mabs_mul _ _) _)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_of_le_of_le {a b lb ub : G} (hal : lb ≤ a) (hau : a ≤ ub) (hbl : lb ≤ b)
(hbu : b ≤ ub) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ ub / lb :=
mabs_div_le_iff.2 ⟨div_le_div'' hau hbl, div_le_div'' hbu hal⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias dist_bdd_within_interval := abs_sub_le_of_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_mabs_div_le_one (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ 1) : a = b :=
eq_of_mabs_div_eq_one (le_antisymm h (one_le_mabs (a / b)))
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mabs_div_lt_all {x y : G} (h : ∀ ε > 1, |x / y|ₘ < ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_mabs_div_le_one <| forall_lt_iff_le'.mp h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mabs_div_le_all [DenselyOrdered G] {x y : G} (h : ∀ ε > 1, |x / y|ₘ ≤ ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_mabs_div_le_one <| forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense.mp h
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_one : |a / b|ₘ ≤ 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mabs_div_le_one, by rintro rfl; rw [div_self', mabs_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_pos : 1 < |a / b|ₘ ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_le.symm.trans mabs_div_le_one.not
|
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Abs.lean | 213 | 214 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter hiding map
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
The measure of a set `s`, denoted `μ s`, is an extended nonnegative real. The real-valued version
is written `μ.real s`.
-/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
/-- Notation for `Measure` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra in the domain. -/
scoped notation "Measure[" mα "] " α:arg => @Measure α mα
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := measure_empty (μ := m.toOuterMeasure)
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
/-- The real-valued version of a measure. Maps infinite measure sets to zero. Use as `μ.real s`.
The API is developed in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real`. -/
protected def Measure.real {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
(μ s).toReal
theorem measureReal_def {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.real s = (μ s).toReal := rfl
alias Measure.real_def := measureReal_def
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by
rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- A variant of `measure_eq_iInf` which has a single `iInf`. This is useful when applying a
lemma next that only works for non-empty infima, in which case you can use
`nonempty_measurable_superset`. -/
theorem measure_eq_iInf' (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = ⨅ t : { t // s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t }, μ t := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_and, ← measure_eq_iInf]
theorem measure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ s = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty s :=
measure_eq_trim _
theorem toOuterMeasure_eq_inducedOuterMeasure :
μ.toOuterMeasure = inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => μ s) MeasurableSet.empty μ.empty :=
μ.trimmed.symm
theorem measure_eq_extend (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ s = extend (fun t (_ht : MeasurableSet t) => μ t) s := by
rw [extend_eq]
exact hs
theorem nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (h : μ s ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ measure_empty
theorem measure_mono_top (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₁ : μ s₁ = ∞) : μ s₂ = ∞ :=
top_unique <| h₁ ▸ measure_mono h
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_left : μ s ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_left
@[simp, mono]
theorem measure_le_measure_union_right : μ t ≤ μ (s ∪ t) := μ.mono subset_union_right
/-- For every set there exists a measurable superset of the same measure. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using μ.toOuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_eq_trim s
/-- For every set `s` and a countable collection of measures `μ i` there exists a measurable
superset `t ⊇ s` such that each measure `μ i` takes the same value on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ ∀ i, μ i t = μ i s := by
simpa only [← measure_eq_trim] using
OuterMeasure.exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq_trim (fun i => (μ i).toOuterMeasure) s
theorem exists_measurable_superset₂ (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = μ s ∧ ν t = ν s := by
simpa only [Bool.forall_bool.trans and_comm] using
exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq (fun b => cond b μ ν) s
theorem exists_measurable_superset_of_null (h : μ s = 0) : ∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0 :=
h ▸ exists_measurable_superset μ s
theorem exists_measurable_superset_iff_measure_eq_zero :
(∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ MeasurableSet t ∧ μ t = 0) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_t, hst, _, ht⟩ => measure_mono_null hst ht, exists_measurable_superset_of_null⟩
theorem measure_biUnion_lt_top {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Finite)
(hfin : ∀ i ∈ s, μ (f i) < ∞) : μ (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) < ∞ := by
convert (measure_biUnion_finset_le (μ := μ) hs.toFinset f).trans_lt _ using 3
· ext
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset]
· simpa only [ENNReal.sum_lt_top, Finite.mem_toFinset]
theorem measure_union_lt_top (hs : μ s < ∞) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ :=
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hs, ht⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_lt_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) < ∞ ↔ μ s < ∞ ∧ μ t < ∞ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => measure_union_lt_top h.1 h.2⟩
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_left).trans_lt h
· exact (measure_mono Set.subset_union_right).trans_lt h
theorem measure_union_ne_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∪ t) ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_union_lt_top hs.lt_top ht.lt_top).ne
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem measure_symmDiff_ne_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞ :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top (measure_union_ne_top hs ht) <| measure_mono symmDiff_subset_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_eq_top_iff : μ (s ∪ t) = ∞ ↔ μ s = ∞ ∨ μ t = ∞ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simp only [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, ← Ne.eq_def, not_or, measure_union_lt_top_iff]
theorem exists_measure_pos_of_not_measure_iUnion_null [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : μ (⋃ n, s n) ≠ 0) : ∃ n, 0 < μ (s n) := by
contrapose! hs
exact measure_iUnion_null fun n => nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (hs n)
theorem measure_lt_top_of_subset (hst : t ⊆ s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ t < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (μ.mono hst) hs.lt_top
|
theorem measure_ne_top_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_lt_top_of_subset h ht).ne
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 254 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Primrec
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# The partial recursive functions
The partial recursive functions are defined similarly to the primitive
recursive functions, but now all functions are partial, implemented
using the `Part` monad, and there is an additional operation, called
μ-recursion, which performs unbounded minimization: `μ f` returns the
least natural number `n` for which `f n = 0`, or diverges if such `n` doesn't exist.
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for functions `f : ℕ →. ℕ`
- `Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for partial functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Computable f`: `f` is partial recursive, for total functions between `Primcodable` types
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Encodable Denumerable Part
attribute [-simp] not_forall
namespace Nat
section Rfind
variable (p : ℕ →. Bool)
private def lbp (m n : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n + 1 ∧ ∀ k ≤ n, false ∈ p k
private def wf_lbp (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom) : WellFounded (lbp p) :=
⟨by
let ⟨n, pn⟩ := H
suffices ∀ m k, n ≤ k + m → Acc (lbp p) k by exact fun a => this _ _ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
intro m k kn
induction' m with m IH generalizing k <;> refine ⟨_, fun y r => ?_⟩ <;> rcases r with ⟨rfl, a⟩
· injection mem_unique pn.1 (a _ kn)
· exact IH _ (by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; exact kn)⟩
variable (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a subtype. -/
def rfindX : { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } :=
suffices ∀ k, (∀ n < k, false ∈ p n) → { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } from
this 0 fun _ => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim
@WellFounded.fix _ _ (lbp p) (wf_lbp p H)
(by
intro m IH al
have pm : (p m).Dom := by
rcases H with ⟨n, h₁, h₂⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h₃ | h₃ | h₃)
· exact h₂ _ h₃
· rw [h₃]
exact h₁.fst
· injection mem_unique h₁ (al _ h₃)
cases e : (p m).get pm
· suffices ∀ᵉ k ≤ m, false ∈ p k from IH _ ⟨rfl, this⟩ fun n h => this _ (le_of_lt_succ h)
intro n h
rcases h.lt_or_eq_dec with h | h
· exact al _ h
· rw [h]
exact ⟨_, e⟩
· exact ⟨m, ⟨_, e⟩, al⟩)
end Rfind
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfind (p : ℕ →. Bool) : Part ℕ :=
⟨_, fun h => (rfindX p h).1⟩
theorem rfind_spec {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : true ∈ p n :=
h.snd ▸ (rfindX p h.fst).2.1
theorem rfind_min {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
@(h.snd ▸ @((rfindX p h.fst).2.2))
@[simp]
theorem rfind_dom {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → (p m).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
theorem rfind_dom' {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m ≤ n → (p m).Dom :=
exists_congr fun _ =>
and_congr_right fun pn =>
⟨fun H _ h => (Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le h).elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ pn.fst) (H _), fun H _ h =>
H (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_rfind {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} :
n ∈ rfind p ↔ true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
⟨fun h => ⟨rfind_spec h, @rfind_min _ _ h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨_, h₁, fun {m} mn => (h₂ mn).fst⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | h | h)
· injection mem_unique (h₂ h) (rfind_spec hm)
· rwa [← h]
· injection mem_unique h₁ (rfind_min hm h)⟩
theorem rfind_min' {p : ℕ → Bool} {m : ℕ} (pm : p m) : ∃ n ∈ rfind p, n ≤ m :=
have : true ∈ (p : ℕ →. Bool) m := ⟨trivial, pm⟩
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨m, this, fun {_} _ => ⟨⟩⟩
⟨n, hn, not_lt.1 fun h => by injection mem_unique this (rfind_min hn h)⟩
theorem rfind_zero_none (p : ℕ →. Bool) (p0 : p 0 = Part.none) : rfind p = Part.none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h =>
let ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := rfind_dom'.1 h.fst
(p0 ▸ h₂ (zero_le _) : (@Part.none Bool).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `f n`, where all `f k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfindOpt {α} (f : ℕ → Option α) : Part α :=
(rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).bind fun n => f n
theorem rfindOpt_spec {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} {a} (h : a ∈ rfindOpt f) : ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
let ⟨n, _, h₂⟩ := mem_bind_iff.1 h
⟨n, mem_coe.1 h₂⟩
theorem rfindOpt_dom {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} : (rfindOpt f).Dom ↔ ∃ n a, a ∈ f n :=
⟨fun h => (rfindOpt_spec ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp fun _ h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun h => by
have h' : ∃ n, (f n).isSome := h.imp fun n => Option.isSome_iff_exists.2
have s := Nat.find_spec h'
have fd : (rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).Dom :=
⟨Nat.find h', by simpa using s.symm, fun _ _ => trivial⟩
refine ⟨fd, ?_⟩
have := rfind_spec (get_mem fd)
simpa using this⟩
theorem rfindOpt_mono {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} (H : ∀ {a m n}, m ≤ n → a ∈ f m → a ∈ f n) {a} :
a ∈ rfindOpt f ↔ ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
⟨rfindOpt_spec, fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
have h' := rfindOpt_dom.2 ⟨_, _, h⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := rfindOpt_spec ⟨h', rfl⟩
have := (H (le_max_left _ _) h).symm.trans (H (le_max_right _ _) hk)
simp at this; simp [this, get_mem]⟩
/-- `Partrec f` means that the partial function `f : ℕ → ℕ` is partially recursive. -/
inductive Partrec : (ℕ →. ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Partrec (pure 0)
| succ : Partrec succ
| left : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => pair <$> f n <*> g n
| comp {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => g n >>= f
| prec {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec (unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (f a) fun y IH => do let i ← IH; g (pair a (pair y i)))
| rfind {f} : Partrec f → Partrec fun a => rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (pair a n)
namespace Partrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : ℕ →. ℕ} {g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Partrec g :=
hf.of_eq fun n => eq_some_iff.2 (H n)
theorem of_primrec {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Partrec f := by
induction hf with
| zero => exact zero
| succ => exact succ
| left => exact left
| right => exact right
| pair _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.pair pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp [Seq.seq]
| comp _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.comp pg).of_eq_tot fun n => (by simp)
| prec _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.prec pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp only [unpaired, PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind]
induction n.unpair.2 with
| zero => simp
| succ m IH =>
simp only [mem_bind_iff, mem_some_iff]
exact ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩
protected theorem some : Partrec some :=
of_primrec Primrec.id
theorem none : Partrec fun _ => none :=
(of_primrec (Nat.Primrec.const 1)).rfind.of_eq fun _ =>
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => by simp at h
theorem prec' {f g h} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g) (hh : Partrec h) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind fun n => n.rec (g a)
fun y IH => do {let i ← IH; h (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))} :=
((prec hg hh).comp (pair Partrec.some hf)).of_eq fun a =>
ext fun s => by simp [Seq.seq]
theorem ppred : Partrec fun n => ppred n :=
have : Primrec₂ fun n m => if n = Nat.succ m then 0 else 1 :=
(Primrec.ite
(@PrimrecRel.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Primrec.eq Primrec.fst (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp Primrec.snd))
(_root_.Primrec.const 0) (_root_.Primrec.const 1)).to₂
(of_primrec (Primrec₂.unpaired'.2 this)).rfind.of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
· exact
eq_none_iff.2 fun a ⟨⟨m, h, _⟩, _⟩ => by
simp [show 0 ≠ m.succ by intro h; injection h] at h
· refine eq_some_iff.2 ?_
simp only [mem_rfind, not_true, IsEmpty.forall_iff, decide_true, mem_some_iff,
false_eq_decide_iff, true_and]
intro m h
simp [ne_of_gt h]
end Partrec
end Nat
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α →. σ) :=
Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := α) n) fun a => (f a).map encode
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β →. σ) :=
Partrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- Computable functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types:
a function is computable if and only if it is partially recursive (as a partial function) -/
def Computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → σ) :=
Partrec (f : α →. σ)
/-- Computable functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Computable₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
theorem Primrec.to_comp {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) :
Computable f :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp (Nat.Partrec.of_primrec hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp; cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
nonrec theorem Primrec₂.to_comp {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Computable₂ f :=
hf.to_comp
protected theorem Computable.partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ}
(hf : Computable f) : Partrec (f : α →. σ) :=
hf
protected theorem Computable₂.partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) : Partrec₂ fun a => (f a : β →. σ) :=
hf
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Computable f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Computable g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (s : σ) : Computable fun _ : α => s :=
(Primrec.const _).to_comp
theorem ofOption {f : α → Option β} (hf : Computable f) : Partrec fun a => (f a : Part β) :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp hf).of_eq fun n => by
rcases decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp
rcases f a with - | b <;> simp
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Computable f) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
protected theorem id : Computable (@id α) :=
Primrec.id.to_comp
theorem fst : Computable (@Prod.fst α β) :=
Primrec.fst.to_comp
theorem snd : Computable (@Prod.snd α β) :=
Primrec.snd.to_comp
nonrec theorem pair {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a, g a) :=
(hf.pair hg).of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp [Seq.seq]
theorem unpair : Computable Nat.unpair :=
Primrec.unpair.to_comp
theorem succ : Computable Nat.succ :=
Primrec.succ.to_comp
theorem pred : Computable Nat.pred :=
Primrec.pred.to_comp
theorem nat_bodd : Computable Nat.bodd :=
Primrec.nat_bodd.to_comp
theorem nat_div2 : Computable Nat.div2 :=
Primrec.nat_div2.to_comp
theorem sumInl : Computable (@Sum.inl α β) :=
Primrec.sumInl.to_comp
theorem sumInr : Computable (@Sum.inr α β) :=
Primrec.sumInr.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inl := Computable.sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inr := Computable.sumInr
theorem list_cons : Computable₂ (@List.cons α) :=
Primrec.list_cons.to_comp
theorem list_reverse : Computable (@List.reverse α) :=
Primrec.list_reverse.to_comp
theorem list_getElem? : Computable₂ ((·[·]? : List α → ℕ → Option α)) :=
Primrec.list_getElem?.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get? := list_getElem?
theorem list_append : Computable₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
Primrec.list_append.to_comp
theorem list_concat : Computable₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
Primrec.list_concat.to_comp
theorem list_length : Computable (@List.length α) :=
Primrec.list_length.to_comp
theorem vector_cons {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.cons α n) :=
Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp
theorem vector_toList {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.toList α n) :=
Primrec.vector_toList.to_comp
theorem vector_length {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.length α n) :=
Primrec.vector_length.to_comp
theorem vector_head {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.head α n) :=
Primrec.vector_head.to_comp
theorem vector_tail {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.tail α n) :=
Primrec.vector_tail.to_comp
theorem vector_get {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.get α n) :=
Primrec.vector_get.to_comp
theorem vector_ofFn' {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.ofFn α n) :=
Primrec.vector_ofFn'.to_comp
theorem fin_app {n} : Computable₂ (@id (Fin n → σ)) :=
Primrec.fin_app.to_comp
protected theorem encode : Computable (@encode α _) :=
Primrec.encode.to_comp
protected theorem decode : Computable (decode (α := α)) :=
Primrec.decode.to_comp
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Computable (ofNat α) :=
(Primrec.ofNat _).to_comp
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem option_some : Computable (@Option.some α) :=
Primrec.option_some.to_comp
end Computable
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem of_eq {f g : α →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : α →. σ} {g : α → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Computable g :=
hf.of_eq fun a => eq_some_iff.2 (H a)
theorem none : Partrec fun _ : α => @Part.none σ :=
Nat.Partrec.none.of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
protected theorem some : Partrec (@Part.some α) :=
Computable.id
theorem _root_.Decidable.Partrec.const' (s : Part σ) [Decidable s.Dom] : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
(Computable.ofOption (const (toOption s))).of_eq fun _ => of_toOption s
theorem const' (s : Part σ) : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
haveI := Classical.dec s.Dom
Decidable.Partrec.const' s
protected theorem bind {f : α →. β} {g : α → β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(hg.comp (Nat.Partrec.some.pair hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp [Seq.seq]; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem map {f : α →. β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
simpa [bind_some_eq_map] using Partrec.bind (g := fun a x => some (g a x)) hf hg
theorem to₂ {f : α × β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α →. σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ →. σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Partrec g)
(hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).rec (g a) fun y IH => IH.bind fun i => h a (y, i) :=
(Nat.Partrec.prec' hf hg hh).of_eq fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e]
induction' f a with m IH <;> simp
rw [IH, Part.bind_map]
congr; funext s
simp [encodek]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β →. σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable g) :
Partrec fun a => f (g a) :=
(hf.comp hg).of_eq fun n => by simp; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec f := by simp [Partrec, map_id']
theorem map_encode_iff {f : α →. σ} : (Partrec fun a => (f a).map encode) ↔ Partrec f :=
Iff.rfl
end Partrec
namespace Partrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ →. α} : Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using Partrec.comp (g := fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.1, p.2)) h Primrec₂.pair.to_comp,
fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair.to_comp⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
Partrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ →. σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Partrec₂ f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable h) : Partrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ →. σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Partrec₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Partrec₂
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => f (g a) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
end Computable
namespace Computable₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Computable₂ f := hf
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Computable h) : Computable fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Computable₂
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem rfind {p : α → ℕ →. Bool} (hp : Partrec₂ p) : Partrec fun a => Nat.rfind (p a) :=
(Nat.Partrec.rfind <|
hp.map ((Primrec.dom_bool fun b => cond b 0 1).comp Primrec.snd).to₂.to_comp).of_eq
fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, Nat.rfind_zero_none, map_id']
congr; funext n
simp only [map_map, Function.comp]
refine map_id' (fun b => ?_) _
cases b <;> rfl
theorem rfindOpt {f : α → ℕ → Option σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) :
Partrec fun a => Nat.rfindOpt (f a) :=
(rfind (Primrec.option_isSome.to_comp.comp hf).partrec.to₂).bind (ofOption hf)
theorem nat_casesOn_right {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ →. σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).casesOn (some (g a)) (h a) :=
(nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst (pred.comp <| hf.comp fst)).to₂).of_eq fun a => by
simp only [PFun.coe_val, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]; rcases f a with - | n <;> simp
refine ext fun b => ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· rcases mem_bind_iff.1 H with ⟨c, _, h₂⟩
exact h₂
· have : ∀ m, (Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => Part σ)
(Part.some (g a)) (fun y IH => IH.bind fun _ => h a n) m).Dom := by
intro m
induction m <;> simp [*, H.fst]
exact ⟨⟨this n, H.fst⟩, H.snd⟩
theorem bind_decode₂_iff {f : α →. σ} :
Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode₂ α n) fun a => (f a).map encode :=
⟨fun hf =>
nat_iff.1 <|
(Computable.ofOption Primrec.decode₂.to_comp).bind <|
(map hf (Computable.encode.comp snd).to₂).comp snd,
fun h =>
map_encode_iff.1 <| by simpa [encodek₂] using (nat_iff.2 h).comp (@Computable.encode α _)⟩
theorem vector_mOfFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α →. σ},
(∀ i, Partrec (f i)) → Partrec fun a : α => Vector.mOfFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => const _
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simp only [Vector.mOfFn, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, pure_eq_some, bind_eq_bind]
exact
(hf 0).bind
(Partrec.bind ((vector_mOfFn fun i => hf i.succ).comp fst)
(Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))
end Partrec
@[simp]
theorem Vector.mOfFn_part_some {α n} :
∀ f : Fin n → α,
(List.Vector.mOfFn fun i => Part.some (f i)) = Part.some (List.Vector.ofFn f) :=
Vector.mOfFn_pure
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => Option.some (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| Primrec.pred.to_comp.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).bind (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f :=
⟨fun hf =>
Nat.Partrec.of_eq
(((Partrec.nat_iff.2
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp <| Nat.Partrec.of_primrec <| Primcodable.prim (α := β))).comp
snd).bind
(Computable.comp hf fst).to₂.partrec₂)
fun n => by
simp only [decode_prod_val, decode_nat, Option.map_some', PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind,
bind_some, Part.map_bind, map_some]
cases decode (α := α) n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases decode (α := β) n.unpair.2 <;> simp,
fun hf => by
have :
Partrec fun a : α × ℕ =>
(encode (decode (α := β) a.2)).casesOn (some Option.none)
fun n => Part.map (f a.1) (decode (α := β) n) :=
Partrec.nat_casesOn_right
(h := fun (a : α × ℕ) (n : ℕ) ↦ map (fun b ↦ f a.1 b) (Part.ofOption (decode n)))
(Primrec.encdec.to_comp.comp snd) (const Option.none)
((ofOption (Computable.decode.comp snd)).map (hf.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd).to₂)
refine this.of_eq fun a => ?_
simp; cases decode (α := β) a.2 <;> simp [encodek]⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).map (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f := by
convert (bind_decode_iff (f := fun a => Option.some ∘ f a)).trans option_some_iff
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => σ) (g a) (fun y IH => h a (y, IH)) (f a) :=
(Partrec.nat_rec hf hg hh.partrec₂).of_eq fun a => by simp; induction f a <;> simp [*]
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.casesOn (motive := fun _ => σ) (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst <| fst.comp snd).to₂
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Computable c) (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) : Computable fun a => cond (c a) (f a) (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Computable o)
(hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (map_decode_iff.2 hg)).of_eq fun a => by
cases o a <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) : Computable fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const Option.none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
convert option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem option_getD {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a).getD (g a) :=
(Computable.option_casesOn hf hg (show Computable₂ fun _ b => b from Computable.snd)).of_eq
fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem subtype_mk {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {h : ∀ a, p (f a)}
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hf : Computable f) :
@Computable _ _ _ (Primcodable.subtype hp) fun a => (⟨f a, h a⟩ : Subtype p) :=
hf
theorem sumCasesOn {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (nat_bodd.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf)
(option_map (Computable.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hh)
(option_map (Computable.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hg)).of_eq
fun a => by
rcases f a with b | c <;> simp [Nat.div2_val]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn := sumCasesOn
theorem nat_strong_rec (f : α → ℕ → σ) {g : α → List σ → Option σ} (hg : Computable₂ g)
(H : ∀ a n, g a ((List.range n).map (f a)) = Option.some (f a n)) : Computable₂ f :=
suffices Computable₂ fun a n => (List.range n).map (f a) from
option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_getElem?.comp (this.comp fst (succ.comp snd)) snd).to₂.of_eq fun a => by
simp [List.getElem?_range (Nat.lt_succ_self a.2)]
option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_rec snd (const (Option.some []))
(to₂ <|
option_bind (snd.comp snd) <|
to₂ <|
option_map (hg.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd)
(to₂ <| list_concat.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))).of_eq
fun a => by
induction' a.2 with n IH; · rfl
simp [IH, H, List.range_succ]
theorem list_ofFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ},
(∀ i, Computable (f i)) → Computable fun a => List.ofFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => by
simp only [List.ofFn_zero]
exact const []
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simp only [List.ofFn_succ]
exact list_cons.comp (hf 0) (list_ofFn fun i => hf i.succ)
theorem vector_ofFn {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ} (hf : ∀ i, Computable (f i)) :
Computable fun a => List.Vector.ofFn fun i => f i a :=
(Partrec.vector_mOfFn hf).of_eq fun a => by simp
end Computable
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem option_some_iff {f : α →. σ} : (Partrec fun a => (f a).map Option.some) ↔ Partrec f :=
⟨fun h => (Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp [Part.bind_assoc, bind_some_eq_map],
fun hf => hf.map (option_some.comp snd).to₂⟩
theorem optionCasesOn_right {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β →. σ} (ho : Computable o)
(hf : Computable f) (hg : Partrec₂ g) :
@Partrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (Part.some (f a)) (g a) :=
have :
Partrec fun a : α =>
Nat.casesOn (encode (o a)) (Part.some (f a)) (fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := β) n) (g a)) :=
nat_casesOn_right (h := fun a n ↦ Part.bind (ofOption (decode n)) fun b ↦ g a b)
(encode_iff.2 ho) hf.partrec <|
((@Computable.decode β _).comp snd).ofOption.bind (hg.comp (fst.comp fst) snd).to₂
this.of_eq fun a => by rcases o a with - | b <;> simp [encodek]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias option_casesOn_right := optionCasesOn_right
theorem sumCasesOn_right {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ →. σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Partrec₂ h) :
@Partrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (fun b => Part.some (g a b)) (h a) :=
have :
Partrec fun a =>
(Option.casesOn (Sum.casesOn (f a) (fun _ => Option.none) Option.some : Option γ)
(some (Sum.casesOn (f a) (fun b => some (g a b)) fun _ => Option.none)) fun c =>
(h a c).map Option.some :
Part (Option σ)) :=
optionCasesOn_right (g := fun a n => Part.map Option.some (h a n))
(sumCasesOn hf (const Option.none).to₂ (option_some.comp snd).to₂)
(sumCasesOn (g := fun a n => Option.some (g a n)) hf (option_some.comp hg)
(const Option.none).to₂)
(option_some_iff.2 hh)
option_some_iff.1 <| this.of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> simp
theorem sumCasesOn_left {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β →. σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Partrec₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) :
@Partrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun c => Part.some (h a c) :=
(sumCasesOn_right (sumCasesOn hf (sumInr.comp snd).to₂ (sumInl.comp snd).to₂) hh hg).of_eq
fun a => by cases f a <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn_left := sumCasesOn_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn_right := sumCasesOn_right
theorem fix_aux {α σ} (f : α →. σ ⊕ α) (a : α) (b : σ) :
let F : α → ℕ →. σ ⊕ α := fun a n =>
n.rec (some (Sum.inr a)) fun _ IH => IH.bind fun s => Sum.casesOn s (fun _ => Part.some s) f
(∃ n : ℕ,
((∃ b' : σ, Sum.inl b' ∈ F a n) ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → ∃ b : α, Sum.inr b ∈ F a m) ∧
Sum.inl b ∈ F a n) ↔
b ∈ PFun.fix f a := by
intro F; refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨n, ⟨_x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩
have : ∀ m a', Sum.inr a' ∈ F a m → b ∈ PFun.fix f a' → b ∈ PFun.fix f a := by
intro m a' am ba
induction' m with m IH generalizing a' <;> simp [F] at am
· rwa [← am]
rcases am with ⟨a₂, am₂, fa₂⟩
exact IH _ am₂ (PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, fa₂, ba⟩))
cases n <;> simp [F] at h₂
rcases h₂ with (h₂ | ⟨a', am', fa'⟩)
· obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h₁ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
injection mem_unique h h₂
· exact this _ _ am' (PFun.mem_fix_iff.2 (Or.inl fa'))
· suffices ∀ a', b ∈ PFun.fix f a' → ∀ k, Sum.inr a' ∈ F a k →
∃ n, Sum.inl b ∈ F a n ∧ ∀ m < n, k ≤ m → ∃ a₂, Sum.inr a₂ ∈ F a m by
rcases this _ h 0 (by simp [F]) with ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, hn₁⟩, fun {m} mn => hn₂ m mn (Nat.zero_le _)⟩, hn₁⟩
intro a₁ h₁
apply @PFun.fixInduction _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁
intro a₂ h₂ IH k hk
rcases PFun.mem_fix_iff.1 h₂ with (h₂ | ⟨a₃, am₃, _⟩)
· refine ⟨k.succ, ?_, fun m mk km => ⟨a₂, ?_⟩⟩
· simpa [F] using Or.inr ⟨_, hk, h₂⟩
· rwa [le_antisymm (Nat.le_of_lt_succ mk) km]
· rcases IH _ am₃ k.succ (by simpa [F] using ⟨_, hk, am₃⟩) with ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩
refine ⟨n, hn₁, fun m mn km => ?_⟩
rcases km.lt_or_eq_dec with km | km
· exact hn₂ _ mn km
· exact km ▸ ⟨_, hk⟩
theorem fix {f : α →. σ ⊕ α} (hf : Partrec f) : Partrec (PFun.fix f) := by
let F : α → ℕ →. σ ⊕ α := fun a n =>
n.rec (some (Sum.inr a)) fun _ IH => IH.bind fun s => Sum.casesOn s (fun _ => Part.some s) f
have hF : Partrec₂ F :=
Partrec.nat_rec snd (sumInr.comp fst).partrec
(sumCasesOn_right (snd.comp snd) (snd.comp <| snd.comp fst).to₂ (hf.comp snd).to₂).to₂
let p a n := @Part.map _ Bool (fun s => Sum.casesOn s (fun _ => true) fun _ => false) (F a n)
have hp : Partrec₂ p :=
hF.map ((sumCasesOn Computable.id (const true).to₂ (const false).to₂).comp snd).to₂
exact ((Partrec.rfind hp).bind (hF.bind (sumCasesOn_right snd snd.to₂ none.to₂).to₂).to₂).of_eq
fun a => ext fun b => by simpa [p] using fix_aux f _ _
end Partrec
| Mathlib/Computability/Partrec.lean | 787 | 801 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} :
∀ n, s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| 0, h => bisim h
| n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} : s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a :: corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1 :: corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a :: unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n))) = get s₁ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons]
rw [get_interleave_left n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem get_interleave_right : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n + 1) = get s₂ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n + 1))) = get s₂ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons,
get_interleave_right n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem mem_interleave_left {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_interleave_left])
theorem mem_interleave_right {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_interleave_right])
theorem odd_eq (s : Stream' α) : odd s = even (tail s) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_even (s : Stream' α) : head (even s) = head s :=
rfl
theorem tail_even (s : Stream' α) : tail (even s) = even (tail (tail s)) := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]
rfl
theorem even_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (s : Stream' α) : even (a₁::a₂::s) = a₁::even s := by
| unfold even
rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem even_tail (s : Stream' α) : even (tail s) = odd s :=
rfl
theorem even_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : even (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₁ :=
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 403 | 409 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Localization
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.CompatibleSheafification
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheafification
/-! # Functors which preserve sheafification
In this file, given a Grothendieck topology `J` on `C` and `F : A ⥤ B`,
we define a type class `J.PreservesSheafification F`. We say that `F` preserves
the sheafification if whenever a morphism of presheaves `P₁ ⟶ P₂` induces
an isomorphism on the associated sheaves, then the induced map `P₁ ⋙ F ⟶ P₂ ⋙ F`
also induces an isomorphism on the associated sheaves. (Note: it suffices to check
this property for the map from any presheaf `P` to its associated sheaf, see
`GrothendieckTopology.preservesSheafification_iff_of_adjunctions`).
In general, we define `Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F : Sheaf J A ⥤ Sheaf J B` as the functor
which sends a sheaf `G` to the sheafification of the composition `G.val ⋙ F`.
If `J.PreservesSheafification F`, we show that this functor can also be thought of
as the localization of the functor `_ ⋙ F` on presheaves: we construct an isomorphism
`presheafToSheafCompComposeAndSheafifyIso` between
`presheafToSheaf J A ⋙ Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F` and
`(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B`.
Moreover, if we assume `J.HasSheafCompose F`, we obtain an isomorphism
`sheafifyComposeIso J F P : sheafify J (P ⋙ F) ≅ sheafify J P ⋙ F`.
We show that under suitable assumptions, the forgetful functor from a concrete
category preserves sheafification; this holds more generally for
functors between such concrete categories which commute both with
suitable limits and colimits.
## TODO
* construct an isomorphism `Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F ≅ sheafCompose J F`
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
{A B : Type*} [Category A] [Category B] (F : A ⥤ B)
namespace GrothendieckTopology
/-- A functor `F : A ⥤ B` preserves the sheafification for the Grothendieck
topology `J` on a category `C` if whenever a morphism of presheaves `f : P₁ ⟶ P₂`
in `Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A` is such that becomes an iso after sheafification, then it is
also the case of `whiskerRight f F : P₁ ⋙ F ⟶ P₂ ⋙ F`. -/
class PreservesSheafification : Prop where
le : J.W ≤ J.W.inverseImage ((whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F)
variable [PreservesSheafification J F]
lemma W_of_preservesSheafification
{P₁ P₂ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : P₁ ⟶ P₂) (hf : J.W f) :
J.W (whiskerRight f F) :=
PreservesSheafification.le _ hf
variable [HasWeakSheafify J B]
lemma W_isInvertedBy_whiskeringRight_presheafToSheaf :
J.W.IsInvertedBy (((whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F) ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B) := by
intro P₁ P₂ f hf
dsimp
rw [← W_iff]
exact J.W_of_preservesSheafification F _ hf
end GrothendieckTopology
section
variable [HasWeakSheafify J B]
/-- This is the functor sending a sheaf `X : Sheaf J A` to the sheafification
of `X.val ⋙ F`. -/
noncomputable abbrev Sheaf.composeAndSheafify : Sheaf J A ⥤ Sheaf J B :=
sheafToPresheaf J A ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B
variable [HasWeakSheafify J A]
/-- The canonical natural transformation from
`(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B` to
`presheafToSheaf J A ⋙ Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def toPresheafToSheafCompComposeAndSheafify :
(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B ⟶
presheafToSheaf J A ⋙ Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F :=
whiskerRight (sheafificationAdjunction J A).unit
((whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B)
variable [J.PreservesSheafification F]
instance : IsIso (toPresheafToSheafCompComposeAndSheafify J F) := by
rw [NatTrans.isIso_iff_isIso_app]
intro X
dsimp
simpa only [← J.W_iff] using J.W_of_preservesSheafification F _ (J.W_toSheafify X)
/-- The canonical isomorphism between `presheafToSheaf J A ⋙ Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F`
and `(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B` when `F : A ⥤ B`
preserves sheafification. -/
@[simps! inv_app]
noncomputable def presheafToSheafCompComposeAndSheafifyIso :
presheafToSheaf J A ⋙ Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F ≅
(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B :=
(asIso (toPresheafToSheafCompComposeAndSheafify J F)).symm
noncomputable instance : Localization.Lifting (presheafToSheaf J A) J.W
((whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ presheafToSheaf J B) (Sheaf.composeAndSheafify J F) :=
⟨presheafToSheafCompComposeAndSheafifyIso J F⟩
end
section
variable {G₁ : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A} (adj₁ : G₁ ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A)
{G₂ : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ B) ⥤ Sheaf J B}
lemma GrothendieckTopology.preservesSheafification_iff_of_adjunctions
(adj₂ : G₂ ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J B) :
J.PreservesSheafification F ↔ ∀ (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A),
IsIso (G₂.map (whiskerRight (adj₁.unit.app P) F)) := by
simp only [← J.W_iff_isIso_map_of_adjunction adj₂]
constructor
· intro _ P
apply W_of_preservesSheafification
rw [J.W_iff_isIso_map_of_adjunction adj₁]
infer_instance
· intro h
constructor
intro P₁ P₂ f hf
rw [J.W_iff_isIso_map_of_adjunction adj₁] at hf
dsimp [MorphismProperty.inverseImage]
rw [← (W _).postcomp_iff _ _ (h P₂), ← whiskerRight_comp]
erw [adj₁.unit.naturality f]
dsimp only [Functor.comp_map]
rw [whiskerRight_comp, (W _).precomp_iff _ _ (h P₁)]
apply Localization.LeftBousfield.W_of_isIso
section HasSheafCompose
variable (adj₂ : G₂ ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J B) [J.HasSheafCompose F]
/-- The canonical natural transformation
`(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ G₂ ⟶ G₁ ⋙ sheafCompose J F`
when `F : A ⥤ B` is such that `J.HasSheafCompose F`, and that `G₁` and `G₂` are
left adjoints to the forget functors `sheafToPresheaf`. -/
def sheafComposeNatTrans :
(whiskeringRight Cᵒᵖ A B).obj F ⋙ G₂ ⟶ G₁ ⋙ sheafCompose J F where
app P := (adj₂.homEquiv _ _).symm (whiskerRight (adj₁.unit.app P) F)
naturality {P Q} f := by
dsimp
erw [← adj₂.homEquiv_naturality_left_symm,
← adj₂.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm]
dsimp
rw [← whiskerRight_comp, ← whiskerRight_comp]
erw [adj₁.unit.naturality f]
rfl
lemma sheafComposeNatTrans_fac (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) :
adj₂.unit.app (P ⋙ F) ≫
(sheafToPresheaf J B).map ((sheafComposeNatTrans J F adj₁ adj₂).app P) =
whiskerRight (adj₁.unit.app P) F := by
simp [sheafComposeNatTrans, -sheafToPresheaf_obj, -sheafToPresheaf_map,
Adjunction.homEquiv_counit]
lemma sheafComposeNatTrans_app_uniq (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A)
(α : G₂.obj (P ⋙ F) ⟶ (sheafCompose J F).obj (G₁.obj P))
(hα : adj₂.unit.app (P ⋙ F) ≫ (sheafToPresheaf J B).map α =
whiskerRight (adj₁.unit.app P) F) :
α = (sheafComposeNatTrans J F adj₁ adj₂).app P := by
apply (adj₂.homEquiv _ _).injective
dsimp [sheafComposeNatTrans]
erw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
rw [← hα]
apply adj₂.homEquiv_unit
lemma GrothendieckTopology.preservesSheafification_iff_of_adjunctions_of_hasSheafCompose :
J.PreservesSheafification F ↔ IsIso (sheafComposeNatTrans J F adj₁ adj₂) := by
rw [J.preservesSheafification_iff_of_adjunctions F adj₁ adj₂,
| NatTrans.isIso_iff_isIso_app]
apply forall_congr'
intro P
rw [← J.W_iff_isIso_map_of_adjunction adj₂, ← J.W_sheafToPreheaf_map_iff_isIso,
← sheafComposeNatTrans_fac J F adj₁ adj₂,
(W _).precomp_iff _ _ (J.W_adj_unit_app adj₂ (P ⋙ F))]
variable [J.PreservesSheafification F]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/PreservesSheafification.lean | 189 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.LeftHomology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
/-!
# Right Homology of short complexes
In this file, we define the dual notions to those defined in
`Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.LeftHomology`. In particular, if `S : ShortComplex C` is
a short complex consisting of two composable maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such
that `f ≫ g = 0`, we define `h : S.RightHomologyData` to be the datum of morphisms
`p : X₂ ⟶ Q` and `ι : H ⟶ Q` such that `Q` identifies to the cokernel of `f` and `H`
to the kernel of the induced map `g' : Q ⟶ X₃`.
When such a `S.RightHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasRightHomology]`
and we define `S.rightHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen right homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.opcycles` to be the `Q` field.
In `Homology.lean`, when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data
(i.e. they give the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define
`[S.HasHomology]` and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q` and
`ι : H ⟶ Q` such that `p` identifies `Q` to the kernel of `f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`,
and that `ι` identifies `H` to the kernel of the induced map `g' : Q ⟶ S.X₃` -/
structure RightHomologyData where
/-- a choice of cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` -/
Q : C
/-- a choice of kernel of the induced morphism `S.g' : S.Q ⟶ X₃` -/
H : C
/-- the projection from `S.X₂` -/
p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q
/-- the inclusion of the (right) homology in the chosen cokernel of `S.f` -/
ι : H ⟶ Q
/-- the cokernel condition for `p` -/
wp : S.f ≫ p = 0
/-- `p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` -/
hp : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ p wp)
/-- the kernel condition for `ι` -/
wι : ι ≫ hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ _ S.zero) = 0
/-- `ι : H ⟶ Q` is a kernel of `S.g' : Q ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hι : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι ι wι)
initialize_simps_projections RightHomologyData (-hp, -hι)
namespace RightHomologyData
/-- The chosen cokernels and kernels of the limits API give a `RightHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel
[HasCokernel S.f] [HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.RightHomologyData :=
{ Q := cokernel S.f,
H := kernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero),
p := cokernel.π _,
ι := kernel.ι _,
wp := cokernel.condition _,
hp := cokernelIsCokernel _,
wι := kernel.condition _,
hι := kernelIsKernel _, }
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wp wι
variable {S}
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Epi h.p := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hp⟩
instance : Mono h.ι := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hι⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : S.X₂ ⟶ A` such that `S.f ≫ k = 0` descends
to a morphism `Q ⟶ A` -/
def descQ (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.Q ⟶ A :=
h.hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_descQ (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.p ≫ h.descQ k hk = k :=
h.hp.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.one
/-- The morphism from the (right) homology attached to a morphism
`k : S.X₂ ⟶ A` such that `S.f ≫ k = 0`. -/
@[simp]
def descH (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.ι ≫ h.descQ k hk
/-- The morphism `h.Q ⟶ S.X₃` induced by `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` and the fact that
`h.Q` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
def g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃ := h.descQ S.g S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma p_g' : h.p ≫ h.g' = S.g := p_descQ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma ι_g' : h.ι ≫ h.g' = 0 := h.wι
@[reassoc]
lemma ι_descQ_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (x : S.X₃ ⟶ A) (hx : k = S.g ≫ x) :
h.ι ≫ h.descQ k (by rw [hx, S.zero_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = h.ι ≫ h.g' ≫ x by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_epi h.p, hx, p_descQ, p_g'_assoc]
/-- For `h : S.RightHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hι`, saying that
`ι : h.H ⟶ h.Q` is a kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def hι' : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι h.ι h.ι_g') := h.hι
/-- The morphism `A ⟶ H` induced by a morphism `k : A ⟶ Q` such that `k ≫ g' = 0` -/
def liftH (k : A ⟶ h.Q) (hk : k ≫ h.g' = 0) : A ⟶ h.H :=
h.hι.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftH_ι (k : A ⟶ h.Q) (hk : k ≫ h.g' = 0) : h.liftH k hk ≫ h.ι = k :=
h.hι.fac (KernelFork.ofι k hk) WalkingParallelPair.zero
lemma isIso_p (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.p :=
⟨h.descQ (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hf, comp_id]), p_descQ _ _ _, by
simp only [← cancel_epi h.p, p_descQ_assoc, id_comp, comp_id]⟩
lemma isIso_ι (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.ι := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' h.hι' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_epi h.p, id_comp, p_g', comp_zero, hg])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, by rw [← cancel_mono h.ι, assoc, hφ, comp_id, id_comp], hφ⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := S.X₂
H := c.pt
p := 𝟙 _
ι := c.ι
wp := by rw [comp_id, hf]
hp := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
wι := KernelFork.condition _
hι := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_g' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g)
(hc : IsLimit c) : (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).g' = S.g := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).p, p_g',
ofIsLimitKernelFork_p, id_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.RightHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := c.pt
H := c.pt
p := c.π
ι := 𝟙 _
wp := CokernelCofork.condition _
hp := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wι := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simp [hg])
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ (Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simp [hg]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_g' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).g' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).p, p_g', hg, comp_zero]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.RightHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂`
gives a right homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.RightHomologyData where
Q := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
p := 𝟙 _
ι := 𝟙 _
wp := by rw [comp_id, hf]
hp := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
wι := by
change 𝟙 _ ≫ S.g = 0
simp only [hg, comp_zero]
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
@[simp]
lemma ofZeros_g' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).g' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi ((ofZeros S hf hg).p), comp_zero, p_g', hg]
end RightHomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has right homology when there exists a `S.RightHomologyData` -/
class HasRightHomology : Prop where
condition : Nonempty S.RightHomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.RightHomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has right homology -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyData [HasRightHomology S] :
S.RightHomologyData := HasRightHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
namespace HasRightHomology
lemma mk' (h : S.RightHomologyData) : HasRightHomology S := ⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance of_hasCokernel_of_hasKernel
[HasCokernel S.f] [HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.HasRightHomology := HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
instance of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
end HasRightHomology
namespace RightHomologyData
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` induces a left homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.RightHomologyData) : S.op.LeftHomologyData where
K := Opposite.op h.Q
H := Opposite.op h.H
i := h.p.op
π := h.ι.op
wi := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wp
hi := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ h.hp
wπ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wι
hπ := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ h.hι
@[simp] lemma op_f' (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.op.f' = h.g'.op := rfl
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a left homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.RightHomologyData) : S.unop.LeftHomologyData where
K := Opposite.unop h.Q
H := Opposite.unop h.H
i := h.p.unop
π := h.ι.unop
wi := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wp
hi := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπUnop _ _ h.hp
wπ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wι
hπ := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιUnop _ _ h.hι
@[simp] lemma unop_f' {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.unop.f' = h.g'.unop := rfl
end RightHomologyData
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` induces a right homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : S.op.RightHomologyData where
Q := Opposite.op h.K
H := Opposite.op h.H
p := h.i.op
ι := h.π.op
wp := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wi
hp := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ h.hi
wι := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wπ
hι := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ h.hπ
@[simp] lemma op_g' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.op.g' = h.f'.op := rfl
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a right homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : S.unop.RightHomologyData where
Q := Opposite.unop h.K
H := Opposite.unop h.H
p := h.i.unop
ι := h.π.unop
wp := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wi
hp := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιUnop _ _ h.hi
wι := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wπ
hι := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπUnop _ _ h.hπ
@[simp] lemma unop_g' {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.unop.g' = h.f'.unop := rfl
end LeftHomologyData
instance [S.HasLeftHomology] : HasRightHomology S.op :=
HasRightHomology.mk' S.leftHomologyData.op
instance [S.HasRightHomology] : HasLeftHomology S.op :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' S.rightHomologyData.op
lemma hasLeftHomology_iff_op (S : ShortComplex C) :
S.HasLeftHomology ↔ S.op.HasRightHomology :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => HasLeftHomology.mk' S.op.rightHomologyData.unop⟩
lemma hasRightHomology_iff_op (S : ShortComplex C) :
S.HasRightHomology ↔ S.op.HasLeftHomology :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => HasRightHomology.mk' S.op.leftHomologyData.unop⟩
lemma hasLeftHomology_iff_unop (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) :
S.HasLeftHomology ↔ S.unop.HasRightHomology :=
S.unop.hasRightHomology_iff_op.symm
lemma hasRightHomology_iff_unop (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) :
S.HasRightHomology ↔ S.unop.HasLeftHomology :=
S.unop.hasLeftHomology_iff_op.symm
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
/-- Given right homology data `h₁` and `h₂` for two short complexes `S₁` and `S₂`,
a `RightHomologyMapData` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
consists of a description of the induced morphisms on the `Q` (opcycles)
and `H` (right homology) fields of `h₁` and `h₂`. -/
structure RightHomologyMapData where
/-- the induced map on opcycles -/
φQ : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q
/-- the induced map on right homology -/
φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H
/-- commutation with `p` -/
commp : h₁.p ≫ φQ = φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `g'` -/
commg' : φQ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `ι` -/
commι : φH ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.ι ≫ φQ := by aesop_cat
namespace RightHomologyMapData
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] commp commg' commι
/-- The right homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
RightHomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
φQ := 0
φH := 0
/-- The right homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.RightHomologyData) : RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of right homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : RightHomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
RightHomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
φQ := ψ.φQ ≫ ψ'.φQ
φH := ψ.φH ≫ ψ'.φH
instance : Subsingleton (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨fun ψ₁ ψ₂ => by
have hQ : ψ₁.φQ = ψ₂.φQ := by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.p, commp, commp]
have hH : ψ₁.φH = ψ₂.φH := by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.ι, commι, commι, hQ]
cases ψ₁
cases ψ₂
congr⟩
instance : Inhabited (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
let φQ : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q := h₁.descQ (φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p) (by rw [← φ.comm₁₂_assoc, h₂.wp, comp_zero])
have commg' : φQ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
rw [← cancel_epi h₁.p, RightHomologyData.p_descQ_assoc, assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g', φ.comm₂₃, RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc]
let φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := h₂.liftH (h₁.ι ≫ φQ)
(by rw [assoc, commg', RightHomologyData.ι_g'_assoc, zero_comp])
exact ⟨φQ, φH, by simp [φQ], commg', by simp [φH]⟩⟩
instance : Unique (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φH = γ₂.φH := by rw [eq]
lemma congr_φQ {γ₁ γ₂ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φQ = γ₂.φQ := by rw [eq]
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on right homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
φQ := φ.τ₂
φH := φ.τ₂
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on right homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φQ := φ.τ₂
φH := f
commg' := by simp only [RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork_g', φ.comm₂₃]
commι := comm.symm
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on right homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φQ := f
φH := f
commp := comm.symm
variable (S)
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the right homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the right homology data
`RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := c.ι
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the right homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the right homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
φQ := c.π
φH := c.π
end RightHomologyMapData
end
section
variable (S)
variable [S.HasRightHomology]
/-- The right homology of a short complex,
given by the `H` field of a chosen right homology data. -/
noncomputable def rightHomology : C := S.rightHomologyData.H
-- `S.rightHomology` is the simp normal form.
@[simp] lemma rightHomologyData_H : S.rightHomologyData.H = S.rightHomology := rfl
/-- The "opcycles" of a short complex, given by the `Q` field of a chosen right homology data.
This is the dual notion to cycles. -/
noncomputable def opcycles : C := S.rightHomologyData.Q
/-- The canonical map `S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyι : S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.ι
/-- The projection `S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def pOpcycles : S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles := S.rightHomologyData.p
/-- The canonical map `S.opcycles ⟶ X₃`. -/
noncomputable def fromOpcycles : S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃ := S.rightHomologyData.g'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma f_pOpcycles : S.f ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 := S.rightHomologyData.wp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_fromOpcycles : S.pOpcycles ≫ S.fromOpcycles = S.g := S.rightHomologyData.p_g'
instance : Epi S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp only [pOpcycles]
infer_instance
instance : Mono S.rightHomologyι := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyι]
infer_instance
lemma rightHomology_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.rightHomology) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ f₁ ≫ S.rightHomologyι = f₂ ≫ S.rightHomologyι := by
rw [cancel_mono]
@[ext]
lemma rightHomology_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.rightHomology)
(h : f₁ ≫ S.rightHomologyι = f₂ ≫ S.rightHomologyι) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [rightHomology_ext_iff]
lemma opcycles_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.opcycles ⟶ A) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ S.pOpcycles ≫ f₁ = S.pOpcycles ≫ f₂ := by
rw [cancel_epi]
@[ext]
lemma opcycles_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.opcycles ⟶ A)
(h : S.pOpcycles ≫ f₁ = S.pOpcycles ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [opcycles_ext_iff]
lemma isIso_pOpcycles (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso S.pOpcycles :=
RightHomologyData.isIso_p _ hf
/-- When `S.f = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ S.X₂`
induced by `S.pOpcycles`. -/
@[simps! inv]
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoX₂ (hf : S.f = 0) : S.opcycles ≅ S.X₂ := by
have := S.isIso_pOpcycles hf
exact (asIso S.pOpcycles).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoX₂_inv_hom_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.pOpcycles ≫ (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom = 𝟙 _ := (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoX₂_hom_inv_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
(S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom ≫ S.pOpcycles = 𝟙 _ := (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom_inv_id
lemma isIso_rightHomologyι (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso S.rightHomologyι :=
RightHomologyData.isIso_ι _ hg
/-- When `S.g = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ S.rightHomology` induced
by `S.rightHomologyι`. -/
@[simps! inv]
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoRightHomology (hg : S.g = 0) : S.opcycles ≅ S.rightHomology := by
have := S.isIso_rightHomologyι hg
exact (asIso S.rightHomologyι).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoRightHomology_inv_hom_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.rightHomologyι ≫ (S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoRightHomology_hom_inv_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom ≫ S.rightHomologyι = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom_inv_id
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
/-- The (unique) right homology map data associated to a morphism of short complexes that
are both equipped with right homology data. -/
def rightHomologyMapData : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and right homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced right homology map `h₁.H ⟶ h₁.H`. -/
def rightHomologyMap' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := (rightHomologyMapData φ _ _).φH
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and right homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced morphism `h₁.K ⟶ h₁.K` on opcycles. -/
def opcyclesMap' : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q := (rightHomologyMapData φ _ _).φQ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap' : h₁.p ≫ opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p :=
RightHomologyMapData.commp _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesMap'_g' : opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h₁.p, assoc, φ.comm₂₃, p_opcyclesMap'_assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc, RightHomologyData.p_g']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyι_naturality' :
rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.ι ≫ opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ :=
RightHomologyMapData.commι _
end
section
variable [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- The (right) homology map `S₁.rightHomology ⟶ S₂.rightHomology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyMap : S₁.rightHomology ⟶ S₂.rightHomology :=
rightHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The morphism `S₁.opcycles ⟶ S₂.opcycles` induced by a morphism `S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesMap : S₁.opcycles ⟶ S₂.opcycles :=
opcyclesMap' φ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap : S₁.pOpcycles ≫ opcyclesMap φ = φ.τ₂ ≫ S₂.pOpcycles :=
p_opcyclesMap' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_naturality : opcyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.fromOpcycles = S₁.fromOpcycles ≫ φ.τ₃ :=
opcyclesMap'_g' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyι_naturality :
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ S₂.rightHomologyι = S₁.rightHomologyι ≫ opcyclesMap φ :=
rightHomologyι_naturality' _ _ _
end
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma rightHomologyMap'_eq : rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φH :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma opcyclesMap'_eq : opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φQ :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φQ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end RightHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_id (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(RightHomologyMapData.id h).rightHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_id (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(RightHomologyMapData.id h).opcyclesMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_id [HasRightHomology S] :
rightHomologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
rightHomologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_id [HasRightHomology S] :
opcyclesMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
opcyclesMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).rightHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).opcyclesMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_zero [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] :
rightHomologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
rightHomologyMap'_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_zero [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] :
opcyclesMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
opcyclesMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = rightHomologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
rightHomologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := rightHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.rightHomologyMap'_eq, γ₂.rightHomologyMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).rightHomologyMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.comp_φH]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = opcyclesMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫ opcyclesMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := rightHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.opcyclesMap'_eq, γ₂.opcyclesMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).opcyclesMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.comp_φQ]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_comp [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] [HasRightHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
rightHomologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = rightHomologyMap φ₁ ≫ rightHomologyMap φ₂ :=
rightHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] [HasRightHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
opcyclesMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = opcyclesMap φ₁ ≫ opcyclesMap φ₂ :=
opcyclesMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
attribute [simp] rightHomologyMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `H` fields
of right homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def rightHomologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) : h₁.H ≅ h₂.H where
hom := rightHomologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := rightHomologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, rightHomologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, rightHomologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_rightHomologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (rightHomologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `Q` fields
of right homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def opcyclesMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) : h₁.Q ≅ h₂.Q where
hom := opcyclesMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := opcyclesMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, opcyclesMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, opcyclesMap'_id]
instance isIso_opcyclesMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (opcyclesMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.rightHomology ≅ S₂.rightHomology` induced by an isomorphism of
short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : S₁.rightHomology ≅ S₂.rightHomology where
hom := rightHomologyMap e.hom
inv := rightHomologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, rightHomologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, rightHomologyMap_id]
instance isIso_rightHomologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (rightHomologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.opcycles ≅ S₂.opcycles` induced by an isomorphism
of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : S₁.opcycles ≅ S₂.opcycles where
hom := opcyclesMap e.hom
inv := opcyclesMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, opcyclesMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, opcyclesMap_id]
instance isIso_opcyclesMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : IsIso (opcyclesMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (opcyclesMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
namespace RightHomologyData
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) [S.HasRightHomology]
/-- The isomorphism `S.rightHomology ≅ h.H` induced by a right homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyIso : S.rightHomology ≅ h.H :=
rightHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- The isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ h.Q` induced by a right homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIso : S.opcycles ≅ h.Q :=
opcyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv : h.p ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv = S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp [pOpcycles, RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso]
simp only [p_opcyclesMap', id_τ₂, id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcycles_comp_opcyclesIso_hom : S.pOpcycles ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom = h.p := by
simp only [← h.p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι :
h.rightHomologyIso.inv ≫ S.rightHomologyι = h.ι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyι, rightHomologyIso, opcyclesIso, rightHomologyMapIso',
opcyclesMapIso', Iso.refl]
rw [rightHomologyι_naturality']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_ι :
h.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ h.ι = S.rightHomologyι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h.opcyclesIso.inv, ← cancel_epi h.rightHomologyIso.inv,
assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι]
end RightHomologyData
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma rightHomologyMap_eq [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
rightHomologyMap φ = h₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso, rightHomologyMapIso']
rw [← γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, ← rightHomologyMap'_comp,
← rightHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma opcyclesMap_eq [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
opcyclesMap φ = h₁.opcyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φQ ≫ h₂.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp [RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso, cyclesMapIso']
rw [← γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, ← opcyclesMap'_comp, ← opcyclesMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma rightHomologyMap_comm [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.hom = h₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
| simp only [γ.rightHomologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
lemma opcyclesMap_comm [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/RightHomology.lean | 845 | 847 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
/-!
# Typeclasses for groups with an adjoined zero element
This file provides just the typeclass definitions, and the projection lemmas that expose their
members.
## Main definitions
* `GroupWithZero`
* `CommGroupWithZero`
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
universe u
-- We have to fix the universe of `G₀` here, since the default argument to
-- `GroupWithZero.div'` cannot contain a universe metavariable.
variable {G₀ : Type u} {M₀ : Type*}
/-- Typeclass for expressing that a type `M₀` with multiplication and a zero satisfies
`0 * a = 0` and `a * 0 = 0` for all `a : M₀`. -/
class MulZeroClass (M₀ : Type u) extends Mul M₀, Zero M₀ where
/-- Zero is a left absorbing element for multiplication -/
zero_mul : ∀ a : M₀, 0 * a = 0
/-- Zero is a right absorbing element for multiplication -/
mul_zero : ∀ a : M₀, a * 0 = 0
/-- A mixin for left cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsLeftCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication by a nonzero element is left cancellative. -/
protected mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, a ≠ 0 → a * b = a * c → b = c
section IsLeftCancelMulZero
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_left_cancel₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = a * c) : b = c :=
IsLeftCancelMulZero.mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero ha h
theorem mul_right_injective₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : Function.Injective (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ => mul_left_cancel₀ ha
end IsLeftCancelMulZero
/-- A mixin for right cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsRightCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- Multiplicatin by a nonzero element is right cancellative. -/
protected mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, b ≠ 0 → a * b = c * b → a = c
section IsRightCancelMulZero
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_right_cancel₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c * b) : a = c :=
IsRightCancelMulZero.mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero hb h
theorem mul_left_injective₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun a => a * b :=
fun _ _ => mul_right_cancel₀ hb
end IsRightCancelMulZero
/-- A mixin for cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop
extends IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀, IsRightCancelMulZero M₀
export MulZeroClass (zero_mul mul_zero)
attribute [simp] zero_mul mul_zero
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`
for all `a` and `b` of type `G₀`. -/
class NoZeroDivisors (M₀ : Type*) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- For all `a` and `b` of `G₀`, `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`. -/
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : M₀}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
export NoZeroDivisors (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero)
/-- A type `S₀` is a "semigroup with zero” if it is a semigroup with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
class SemigroupWithZero (S₀ : Type u) extends Semigroup S₀, MulZeroClass S₀
/-- A typeclass for non-associative monoids with zero elements. -/
class MulZeroOneClass (M₀ : Type u) extends MulOneClass M₀, MulZeroClass M₀
/-- A type `M₀` is a “monoid with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
class MonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type u) extends Monoid M₀, MulZeroOneClass M₀, SemigroupWithZero M₀
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
/-- If `x` is multiplicative with respect to `f`, then so is any `x^n`. -/
theorem pow_mul_apply_eq_pow_mul {M : Type*} [Monoid M] (f : M₀ → M) {x : M₀}
(hx : ∀ y : M₀, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (n : ℕ) :
∀ (y : M₀), f (x ^ n * y) = f x ^ n * f y := by
induction n with
| zero => intro y; rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul, one_mul]
| succ n hn => intro y; rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hx, hn]
end MonoidWithZero
/-- A type `M` is a `CancelMonoidWithZero` if it is a monoid with zero element, `0` is left
and right absorbing, and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
class CancelMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends MonoidWithZero M₀, IsCancelMulZero M₀
/-- A type `M` is a commutative “monoid with zero” if it is a commutative monoid with zero
element, and `0` is left and right absorbing. -/
class CommMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoid M₀, MonoidWithZero M₀
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_left_inj' (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
(mul_left_injective₀ hc).eq_iff
theorem mul_right_inj' (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_right_injective₀ ha).eq_iff
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup M₀] [Zero M₀]
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsRightCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero :=
fun hb h => mul_left_cancel₀ hb <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _)) }
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero :=
fun hb h => mul_right_cancel₀ hb <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _)) }
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero with }
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero with }
end CommSemigroup
/-- A type `M` is a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` if it is a commutative monoid with zero element,
`0` is left and right absorbing,
and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
class CancelCommMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoidWithZero M₀, IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀
-- See note [lower cancel priority]
attribute [instance 75] CancelCommMonoidWithZero.toCommMonoidWithZero
instance (priority := 100) CancelCommMonoidWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero
[CancelCommMonoidWithZero M₀] : CancelMonoidWithZero M₀ :=
{ IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero (M₀ := M₀) with }
/-- Prop-valued mixin for a monoid with zero to be equipped with a cancelling division.
The obvious use case is groups with zero, but this condition is also satisfied by `ℕ`, `ℤ` and, more
generally, any euclidean domain. -/
class MulDivCancelClass (M₀ : Type*) [MonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] : Prop where
protected mul_div_cancel (a b : M₀) : b ≠ 0 → a * b / b = a
section MulDivCancelClass
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] [MulDivCancelClass M₀]
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel_right₀ (a : M₀) {b : M₀} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
MulDivCancelClass.mul_div_cancel _ _ hb
end MulDivCancelClass
section MulDivCancelClass
variable [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] [MulDivCancelClass M₀]
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel_left₀ (b : M₀) {a : M₀} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ ha]
end MulDivCancelClass
/-- A type `G₀` is a “group with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`.
Examples include division rings and the ordered monoids that are the
target of valuations in general valuation theory. -/
class GroupWithZero (G₀ : Type u) extends MonoidWithZero G₀, DivInvMonoid G₀, Nontrivial G₀ where
/-- The inverse of `0` in a group with zero is `0`. -/
protected inv_zero : (0 : G₀)⁻¹ = 0
/-- Every nonzero element of a group with zero is invertible. -/
protected mul_inv_cancel (a : G₀) : a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a : G₀}
@[simp] lemma inv_zero : (0 : G₀)⁻¹ = 0 := GroupWithZero.inv_zero
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_cancel₀ (h : a ≠ 0) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := GroupWithZero.mul_inv_cancel a h
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GroupWithZero.toMulDivCancelClass : MulDivCancelClass G₀ where
mul_div_cancel a b hb := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hb, mul_one]
end GroupWithZero
/-- A type `G₀` is a commutative “group with zero”
if it is a commutative monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`. -/
class CommGroupWithZero (G₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoidWithZero G₀, GroupWithZero G₀
section
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {x : M₀}
lemma eq_zero_or_one_of_sq_eq_self (hx : x ^ 2 = x) : x = 0 ∨ x = 1 :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr (mul_left_injective₀ · <| by simpa [sq] using hx)
end
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right₀ (h : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
calc
a * b * b⁻¹ = a * (b * b⁻¹) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = a := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left₀ (h : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
| calc
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = a * a⁻¹ * b := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean | 242 | 243 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Antoine Labelle. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.TypeTags
/-!
# Monoid representations
This file introduces monoid representations and their characters and defines a few ways to construct
representations.
## Main definitions
* `Representation`
* `Representation.tprod`
* `Representation.linHom`
* `Representation.dual`
## Implementation notes
Representations of a monoid `G` on a `k`-module `V` are implemented as
homomorphisms `G →* (V →ₗ[k] V)`. We use the abbreviation `Representation` for this hom space.
The theorem `asAlgebraHom_def` constructs a module over the group `k`-algebra of `G` (implemented
as `MonoidAlgebra k G`) corresponding to a representation. If `ρ : Representation k G V`, this
module can be accessed via `ρ.asModule`. Conversely, given a `MonoidAlgebra k G`-module `M`,
`M.ofModule` is the associociated representation seen as a homomorphism.
-/
open MonoidAlgebra (lift of)
open LinearMap
section
variable (k G V : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
/-- A representation of `G` on the `k`-module `V` is a homomorphism `G →* (V →ₗ[k] V)`.
-/
abbrev Representation :=
G →* V →ₗ[k] V
end
namespace Representation
section trivial
variable (k G V : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
/-- The trivial representation of `G` on a `k`-module V.
-/
def trivial : Representation k G V :=
1
variable {G V}
@[simp]
theorem trivial_apply (g : G) (v : V) : trivial k G V g v = v :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- A predicate for representations that fix every element. -/
class IsTrivial (ρ : Representation k G V) : Prop where
out : ∀ g, ρ g = LinearMap.id := by aesop
instance : IsTrivial (trivial k G V) where
@[simp]
theorem isTrivial_def (ρ : Representation k G V) [IsTrivial ρ] (g : G) :
ρ g = LinearMap.id := IsTrivial.out g
theorem isTrivial_apply (ρ : Representation k G V) [IsTrivial ρ] (g : G) (x : V) :
ρ g x = x := congr($(isTrivial_def ρ g) x)
end trivial
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G V : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
variable (ρ : Representation k G V)
/-- A `k`-linear representation of `G` on `V` can be thought of as
an algebra map from `MonoidAlgebra k G` into the `k`-linear endomorphisms of `V`.
-/
noncomputable def asAlgebraHom : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] Module.End k V :=
(lift k G _) ρ
theorem asAlgebraHom_def : asAlgebraHom ρ = (lift k G _) ρ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem asAlgebraHom_single (g : G) (r : k) :
asAlgebraHom ρ (MonoidAlgebra.single g r) = r • ρ g := by
simp only [asAlgebraHom_def, MonoidAlgebra.lift_single]
theorem asAlgebraHom_single_one (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (MonoidAlgebra.single g 1) = ρ g := by simp
theorem asAlgebraHom_of (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (of k G g) = ρ g := by
simp only [MonoidAlgebra.of_apply, asAlgebraHom_single, one_smul]
/-- If `ρ : Representation k G V`, then `ρ.asModule` is a type synonym for `V`,
which we equip with an instance `Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule`.
You should use `asModuleEquiv : ρ.asModule ≃+ V` to translate terms.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def asModule (_ : Representation k G V) :=
V
-- The `AddCommMonoid` and `Module` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : AddCommMonoid (ρ.asModule) := inferInstanceAs <| AddCommMonoid V
instance : Inhabited ρ.asModule where
default := 0
/-- A `k`-linear representation of `G` on `V` can be thought of as
a module over `MonoidAlgebra k G`.
-/
noncomputable instance instModuleAsModule : Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule :=
Module.compHom V (asAlgebraHom ρ).toRingHom
instance : Module k ρ.asModule := inferInstanceAs <| Module k V
/-- The additive equivalence from the `Module (MonoidAlgebra k G)` to the original vector space
of the representative.
This is just the identity, but it is helpful for typechecking and keeping track of instances.
-/
def asModuleEquiv : ρ.asModule ≃ₗ[k] V :=
LinearEquiv.refl _ _
@[simp]
theorem asModuleEquiv_map_smul (r : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : ρ.asModule) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv (r • x) = ρ.asAlgebraHom r (ρ.asModuleEquiv x) :=
rfl
theorem asModuleEquiv_symm_map_smul (r : k) (x : V) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm (r • x) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) r • ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm x := by
rw [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq]
simp
@[simp]
theorem asModuleEquiv_symm_map_rho (g : G) (x : V) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm (ρ g x) = MonoidAlgebra.of k G g • ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm x := by
rw [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq]
simp
/-- Build a `Representation k G M` from a `[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) M]`.
This version is not always what we want, as it relies on an existing `[Module k M]`
instance, along with a `[IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M]` instance.
We remedy this below in `ofModule`
(with the tradeoff that the representation is defined
only on a type synonym of the original module.)
-/
noncomputable def ofModule' (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module k M]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) M] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M] : Representation k G M :=
(MonoidAlgebra.lift k G (M →ₗ[k] M)).symm (Algebra.lsmul k k M)
section
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) M]
/-- Build a `Representation` from a `[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) M]`.
Note that the representation is built on `restrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M`,
rather than on `M` itself.
-/
noncomputable def ofModule : Representation k G (RestrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M) :=
(MonoidAlgebra.lift k G
(RestrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M →ₗ[k]
RestrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M)).symm
(RestrictScalars.lsmul k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M)
/-!
## `ofModule` and `asModule` are inverses.
This requires a little care in both directions:
this is a categorical equivalence, not an isomorphism.
See `Rep.equivalenceModuleMonoidAlgebra` for the full statement.
Starting with `ρ : Representation k G V`, converting to a module and back again
we have a `Representation k G (restrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule)`.
To compare these, we use the composition of `restrictScalarsAddEquiv` and `ρ.asModuleEquiv`.
Similarly, starting with `Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) M`,
after we convert to a representation and back to a module,
we have `Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) (restrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M)`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem ofModule_asAlgebraHom_apply_apply (r : MonoidAlgebra k G)
(m : RestrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) M) :
((ofModule M).asAlgebraHom r) m =
(RestrictScalars.addEquiv _ _ _).symm (r • RestrictScalars.addEquiv _ _ _ m) := by
apply MonoidAlgebra.induction_on r
· intro g
simp only [one_smul, MonoidAlgebra.lift_symm_apply, MonoidAlgebra.of_apply,
Representation.asAlgebraHom_single, Representation.ofModule, AddEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq,
RestrictScalars.lsmul_apply_apply]
· intro f g fw gw
simp only [fw, gw, map_add, add_smul, LinearMap.add_apply]
· intro r f w
simp only [w, map_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply, RestrictScalars.addEquiv_symm_map_smul_smul]
@[simp]
theorem ofModule_asModule_act (g : G) (x : RestrictScalars k (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule) :
ofModule (k := k) (G := G) ρ.asModule g x = -- Porting note: more help with implicit
(RestrictScalars.addEquiv _ _ _).symm
(ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm (ρ g (ρ.asModuleEquiv (RestrictScalars.addEquiv _ _ _ x)))) := by
apply_fun RestrictScalars.addEquiv _ _ ρ.asModule using
(RestrictScalars.addEquiv _ _ ρ.asModule).injective
dsimp [ofModule, RestrictScalars.lsmul_apply_apply]
simp
theorem smul_ofModule_asModule (r : MonoidAlgebra k G) (m : (ofModule M).asModule) :
(RestrictScalars.addEquiv k _ _) ((ofModule M).asModuleEquiv (r • m)) =
r • (RestrictScalars.addEquiv k _ _) ((ofModule M).asModuleEquiv (G := G) m) := by
dsimp
simp only [AddEquiv.apply_symm_apply, ofModule_asAlgebraHom_apply_apply]
end
@[simp]
lemma single_smul (t : k) (g : G) (v : ρ.asModule) :
MonoidAlgebra.single (g : G) t • v = t • ρ g (ρ.asModuleEquiv v) := by
rw [← LinearMap.smul_apply, ← asAlgebraHom_single, ← asModuleEquiv_map_smul]
rfl
instance : IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule where
smul_assoc t x v := by
revert t
apply x.induction_on
· simp
· intro y z hy hz
simp [add_smul, hy, hz]
· intro s y hy t
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, hy (t * s), ← smul_eq_mul, smul_assoc]
aesop
end MonoidAlgebra
section AddCommGroup
variable {k G V : Type*} [CommRing k] [Monoid G] [I : AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable (ρ : Representation k G V)
instance : AddCommGroup ρ.asModule :=
I
end AddCommGroup
section MulAction
variable (k : Type*) [CommSemiring k] (G : Type*) [Monoid G] (H : Type*) [MulAction G H]
/-- A `G`-action on `H` induces a representation `G →* End(k[H])` in the natural way. -/
noncomputable def ofMulAction : Representation k G (H →₀ k) where
toFun g := Finsupp.lmapDomain k k (g • ·)
map_one' := by
ext x y
dsimp
simp
map_mul' x y := by
ext z w
simp [mul_smul]
variable {k G H}
theorem ofMulAction_def (g : G) : ofMulAction k G H g = Finsupp.lmapDomain k k (g • ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofMulAction_single (g : G) (x : H) (r : k) :
ofMulAction k G H g (Finsupp.single x r) = Finsupp.single (g • x) r :=
Finsupp.mapDomain_single
end MulAction
section DistribMulAction
variable (k G A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module k A]
[DistribMulAction G A] [SMulCommClass G k A]
/-- Turns a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of a monoid `G` into a
`k`-linear `G`-representation on `A`. -/
def ofDistribMulAction : Representation k G A where
toFun := fun m =>
{ DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidEnd G A m with
map_smul' := smul_comm _ }
map_one' := by ext; exact one_smul _ _
map_mul' := by intros; ext; exact mul_smul _ _ _
variable {k G A}
@[simp] theorem ofDistribMulAction_apply_apply (g : G) (a : A) :
ofDistribMulAction k G A g a = g • a := rfl
end DistribMulAction
section MulDistribMulAction
variable (M G : Type*) [Monoid M] [CommGroup G] [MulDistribMulAction M G]
/-- Turns a `CommGroup` `G` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of a monoid `M` into a
`ℤ`-linear `M`-representation on `Additive G`. -/
def ofMulDistribMulAction : Representation ℤ M (Additive G) :=
(addMonoidEndRingEquivInt (Additive G) : AddMonoid.End (Additive G) →* _).comp
((monoidEndToAdditive G : _ →* _).comp (MulDistribMulAction.toMonoidEnd M G))
@[simp] theorem ofMulDistribMulAction_apply_apply (g : M) (a : Additive G) :
ofMulDistribMulAction M G g a = Additive.ofMul (g • a.toMul) := rfl
end MulDistribMulAction
section Group
variable {k G V : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Group G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
variable (ρ : Representation k G V)
@[simp]
theorem ofMulAction_apply {H : Type*} [MulAction G H] (g : G) (f : H →₀ k) (h : H) :
ofMulAction k G H g f h = f (g⁻¹ • h) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← smul_inv_smul g h]
let h' := g⁻¹ • h
change ofMulAction k G H g f (g • h') = f h'
have hg : Function.Injective (g • · : H → H) := by
intro h₁ h₂
simp
simp only [ofMulAction_def, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply, Finsupp.mapDomain_apply, hg]
-- Porting note: did not need this in ML3; noncomputable because IR check complains
noncomputable instance :
HMul (MonoidAlgebra k G) ((ofMulAction k G G).asModule) (MonoidAlgebra k G) :=
inferInstanceAs <| HMul (MonoidAlgebra k G) (MonoidAlgebra k G) (MonoidAlgebra k G)
theorem ofMulAction_self_smul_eq_mul (x : MonoidAlgebra k G) (y : (ofMulAction k G G).asModule) :
x • y = (x * y : MonoidAlgebra k G) := -- by
-- Porting note: trouble figuring out the motive
x.induction_on (p := fun z => z • y = z * y)
(fun g => by
show asAlgebraHom (ofMulAction k G G) _ _ = _; ext
simp only [MonoidAlgebra.of_apply, asAlgebraHom_single, one_smul,
ofMulAction_apply, smul_eq_mul]
-- Porting note: single_mul_apply not firing in simp
rw [MonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply, one_mul]
)
(fun x y hx hy => by simp only [hx, hy, add_mul, add_smul]) fun r x hx => by
show asAlgebraHom (ofMulAction k G G) _ _ = _ -- Porting note: was simpa [← hx]
simp only [map_smul, smul_apply, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc]
rw [← hx]
rfl
/-- If we equip `k[G]` with the `k`-linear `G`-representation induced by the left regular action of
`G` on itself, the resulting object is isomorphic as a `k[G]`-module to `k[G]` with its natural
`k[G]`-module structure. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofMulActionSelfAsModuleEquiv :
(ofMulAction k G G).asModule ≃ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] MonoidAlgebra k G :=
{ (asModuleEquiv _).toAddEquiv with map_smul' := ofMulAction_self_smul_eq_mul }
/-- When `G` is a group, a `k`-linear representation of `G` on `V` can be thought of as
a group homomorphism from `G` into the invertible `k`-linear endomorphisms of `V`.
-/
def asGroupHom : G →* Units (V →ₗ[k] V) :=
MonoidHom.toHomUnits ρ
theorem asGroupHom_apply (g : G) : ↑(asGroupHom ρ g) = ρ g := by
simp only [asGroupHom, MonoidHom.coe_toHomUnits]
end Group
section TensorProduct
variable {k G V W : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V] [AddCommMonoid W] [Module k W]
variable (ρV : Representation k G V) (ρW : Representation k G W)
open TensorProduct
/-- Given representations of `G` on `V` and `W`, there is a natural representation of `G` on their
tensor product `V ⊗[k] W`.
-/
noncomputable def tprod : Representation k G (V ⊗[k] W) where
toFun g := TensorProduct.map (ρV g) (ρW g)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, TensorProduct.map_one]
map_mul' g h := by simp only [map_mul, TensorProduct.map_mul]
local notation ρV " ⊗ " ρW => tprod ρV ρW
@[simp]
theorem tprod_apply (g : G) : (ρV ⊗ ρW) g = TensorProduct.map (ρV g) (ρW g) :=
rfl
theorem smul_tprod_one_asModule (r : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : V) (y : W) :
-- Porting note: required to since Lean 4 doesn't unfold asModule
let x' : ρV.asModule := x
let z : (ρV.tprod 1).asModule := x ⊗ₜ y
r • z = (r • x') ⊗ₜ y := by
show asAlgebraHom (ρV ⊗ 1) _ _ = asAlgebraHom ρV _ _ ⊗ₜ _
simp only [asAlgebraHom_def, MonoidAlgebra.lift_apply, tprod_apply, MonoidHom.one_apply,
LinearMap.finsupp_sum_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, TensorProduct.map_tmul, Module.End.one_apply]
simp only [Finsupp.sum, TensorProduct.sum_tmul]
rfl
theorem smul_one_tprod_asModule (r : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : V) (y : W) :
-- Porting note: required to since Lean 4 doesn't unfold asModule
let y' : ρW.asModule := y
| let z : (1 ⊗ ρW).asModule := x ⊗ₜ y
r • z = x ⊗ₜ (r • y') := by
show asAlgebraHom (1 ⊗ ρW) _ _ = _ ⊗ₜ asAlgebraHom ρW _ _
simp only [asAlgebraHom_def, MonoidAlgebra.lift_apply, tprod_apply, MonoidHom.one_apply,
LinearMap.finsupp_sum_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, TensorProduct.map_tmul, Module.End.one_apply]
simp only [Finsupp.sum, TensorProduct.tmul_sum, TensorProduct.tmul_smul]
end TensorProduct
section LinearHom
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Basic.lean | 415 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules.
Given a fixed finite spanning set `b : ι → M` of an `R`-module `M`, we say that a matrix `M`
represents an endomorphism `f : M →ₗ[R] M` if the matrix as an endomorphism of `ι → R` commutes
with `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by `b`.
We show that every endomorphism has a matrix representation, and if `f.range ≤ I • ⊤` for some
ideal `I`, we may furthermore obtain a matrix representation whose entries fall in `I`.
This is used to conclude the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules over arbitrary rings.
-/
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
variable (b : ι → M)
open Polynomial Matrix
/-- The composition of a matrix (as an endomorphism of `ι → R`) with the projection
`(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromMatrix [DecidableEq ι] : Matrix ι ι R →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)).comp algEquivMatrix'.symm.toLinearMap
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A w = Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (j : ι) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A (Pi.single j 1) = ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i := by
rw [PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single]
simp_rw [MulOpposite.op_one, one_smul, transpose_apply]
/-- The endomorphisms of `M` acts on `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`, and takes the projection
to a `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromEnd : Module.End R M →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
LinearMap.lcomp _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply (f : Module.End R M) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f w = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (f : Module.End R M) (i : ι) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f (Pi.single i 1) = f (b i) := by
rw [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply_single, one_smul]
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_injective (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤) :
Function.Injective (PiToModule.fromEnd R b) := by
intro x y e
ext m
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : m ∈ LinearMap.range (Fintype.linearCombination R b) := by
rw [(Fintype.range_linearCombination R b).trans hb]
exact Submodule.mem_top
exact (LinearMap.congr_fun e m :)
section
variable {R} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- We say that a matrix represents an endomorphism of `M` if the matrix acting on `ι → R` is
equal to `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by a fixed (spanning) set. -/
def Matrix.Represents (A : Matrix ι ι R) (f : Module.End R M) : Prop :=
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A = PiToModule.fromEnd R b f
variable {b}
theorem Matrix.Represents.congr_fun {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(x) : Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
LinearMap.congr_fun h x
theorem Matrix.represents_iff {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔
∀ x, Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
⟨fun e x => e.congr_fun x, fun H => LinearMap.ext fun x => H x⟩
theorem Matrix.represents_iff' {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔ ∀ j, ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i = f (b j) := by
constructor
· intro h i
have := LinearMap.congr_fun h (Pi.single i 1)
rwa [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one, PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one] at this
· intro h
ext
simp_rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_single, PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one,
PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one]
apply h
theorem Matrix.Represents.mul {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A * A').Represents b (f * f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_mul]
ext
dsimp [PiToModule.fromEnd]
rw [← h'.congr_fun, ← h.congr_fun]
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.one : (1 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 1 := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_one]
ext
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.add {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
| (h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A + A').Represents b (f + f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h h' ⊢; rw [map_add, map_add, h, h']
theorem Matrix.Represents.zero : (0 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 0 := by
delta Matrix.Represents
rw [map_zero, map_zero]
theorem Matrix.Represents.smul {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/LinearMap.lean | 114 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Quotients of semirings
In this file, we directly define the quotient of a semiring by any relation,
by building a bigger relation that represents the ideal generated by that relation.
We prove the universal properties of the quotient, and recommend avoiding relying on the actual
definition, which is made irreducible for this purpose.
Since everything runs in parallel for quotients of `R`-algebras, we do that case at the same time.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
universe uR uS uT uA u₄
variable {R : Type uR} [Semiring R]
variable {S : Type uS} [CommSemiring S]
variable {T : Type uT}
variable {A : Type uA} [Semiring A] [Algebra S A]
namespace RingCon
instance (c : RingCon A) : Algebra S c.Quotient where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap := c.mk'.comp (algebraMap S A)
commutes' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def' _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ ↦ congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algebraMap (c : RingCon A) (s : S) :
(algebraMap S A s : c.Quotient) = algebraMap S _ s :=
rfl
end RingCon
namespace RingQuot
/-- Given an arbitrary relation `r` on a ring, we strengthen it to a relation `Rel r`,
such that the equivalence relation generated by `Rel r` has `x ~ y` if and only if
`x - y` is in the ideal generated by elements `a - b` such that `r a b`.
-/
inductive Rel (r : R → R → Prop) : R → R → Prop
| of ⦃x y : R⦄ (h : r x y) : Rel r x y
| add_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r a b → Rel r (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_right ⦃a b c⦄ : Rel r b c → Rel r (a * b) (a * c)
theorem Rel.add_right {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) : Rel r (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm a b, add_comm a c]
exact Rel.add_left h
theorem Rel.neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (-a) (-b) := by simp only [neg_eq_neg_one_mul a, neg_eq_neg_one_mul b, Rel.mul_right h]
theorem Rel.sub_left {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) :
Rel r (a - c) (b - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.add_left]
theorem Rel.sub_right {R : Type uR} [Ring R] {r : R → R → Prop} ⦃a b c : R⦄ (h : Rel r b c) :
Rel r (a - b) (a - c) := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, h.neg.add_right]
theorem Rel.smul {r : A → A → Prop} (k : S) ⦃a b : A⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (k • a) (k • b) := by
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, Rel.mul_right h]
/-- `EqvGen (RingQuot.Rel r)` is a ring congruence. -/
def ringCon (r : R → R → Prop) : RingCon R where
r := Relation.EqvGen (Rel r)
iseqv := Relation.EqvGen.is_equivalence _
add' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.add_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.add_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| Relation.EqvGen.refl _)
mul' {a b c d} hab hcd := by
induction hab generalizing c d with
| rel _ _ hab =>
refine (Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hab.mul_left).trans _ _ _ ?_
induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| refl => induction hcd with
| rel _ _ hcd => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ hcd.mul_right
| refl => exact Relation.EqvGen.refl _
| symm _ _ _ h => exact h.symm _ _
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h h' => exact h.trans _ _ _ h'
| symm x y _ hxy => exact (hxy hcd.symm).symm
| trans x y z _ _ h h' => exact (h hcd).trans _ _ _ (h' <| Relation.EqvGen.refl _)
theorem eqvGen_rel_eq (r : R → R → Prop) : Relation.EqvGen (Rel r) = RingConGen.Rel r := by
ext x₁ x₂
constructor
· intro h
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => induction h with
| of => exact RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ ‹_›
| add_left _ h => exact h.add (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_left _ h => exact h.mul (RingConGen.Rel.refl _)
| mul_right _ h => exact (RingConGen.Rel.refl _).mul h
| refl => exact RingConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm => exact RingConGen.Rel.symm ‹_›
| trans => exact RingConGen.Rel.trans ‹_› ‹_›
· intro h
induction h with
| of => exact Relation.EqvGen.rel _ _ (Rel.of ‹_›)
| refl => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).refl _
| symm => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).symm ‹_›
| trans => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).trans ‹_› ‹_›
| add => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).add ‹_› ‹_›
| mul => exact (RingQuot.ringCon r).mul ‹_› ‹_›
end RingQuot
/-- The quotient of a ring by an arbitrary relation. -/
structure RingQuot (r : R → R → Prop) where
toQuot : Quot (RingQuot.Rel r)
namespace RingQuot
variable (r : R → R → Prop)
-- can't be irreducible, causes diamonds in ℕ-algebras
private def natCast (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ n⟩
private irreducible_def zero : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩
private irreducible_def one : RingQuot r :=
⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩
private irreducible_def add : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· + ·) Rel.add_right Rel.add_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def mul : RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ (· * ·) Rel.mul_right Rel.mul_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ -a) Rel.neg a⟩
private irreducible_def sub {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) :
RingQuot r → RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨Quot.map₂ Sub.sub Rel.sub_right Rel.sub_left a b⟩
private irreducible_def npow (n : ℕ) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ =>
⟨Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.mk (RingQuot.Rel r) (a ^ n))
(fun a b (h : Rel r a b) ↦ by
-- note we can't define a `Rel.pow` as `Rel` isn't reflexive so `Rel r 1 1` isn't true
dsimp only
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
simpa only [pow_succ, mul_def, Quot.map₂_mk, mk.injEq] using
congr_arg₂ (fun x y ↦ mul r ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩) ih (Quot.sound h))
a⟩
-- note: this cannot be irreducible, as otherwise diamonds don't commute.
private def smul [Algebra S R] (n : S) : RingQuot r → RingQuot r
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨Quot.map (fun a ↦ n • a) (Rel.smul n) a⟩
instance : NatCast (RingQuot r) :=
⟨natCast r⟩
instance : Zero (RingQuot r) :=
⟨zero r⟩
instance : One (RingQuot r) :=
⟨one r⟩
instance : Add (RingQuot r) :=
⟨add r⟩
instance : Mul (RingQuot r) :=
⟨mul r⟩
instance : NatPow (RingQuot r) :=
⟨fun x n ↦ npow r n x⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Neg (RingQuot r) :=
⟨neg r⟩
instance {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) : Sub (RingQuot r) :=
⟨sub r⟩
instance [Algebra S R] : SMul S (RingQuot r) :=
⟨smul r⟩
theorem zero_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 0⟩ : RingQuot r) = 0 :=
show _ = zero r by rw [zero_def]
theorem one_quot : (⟨Quot.mk _ 1⟩ : RingQuot r) = 1 :=
show _ = one r by rw [one_def]
theorem add_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ + ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a + b)⟩ := by
show add r _ _ = _
rw [add_def]
rfl
theorem mul_quot {a b} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ * ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a * b)⟩ := by
show mul r _ _ = _
rw [mul_def]
rfl
theorem pow_quot {a} {n : ℕ} : (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ ^ n : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a ^ n)⟩ := by
show npow r _ _ = _
rw [npow_def]
theorem neg_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a} :
(-⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (-a)⟩ := by
show neg r _ = _
rw [neg_def]
rfl
theorem sub_quot {R : Type uR} [Ring R] (r : R → R → Prop) {a b} :
| (⟨Quot.mk _ a⟩ - ⟨Quot.mk _ b⟩ : RingQuot r) = ⟨Quot.mk _ (a - b)⟩ := by
show sub r _ _ = _
rw [sub_def]
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/RingQuot.lean | 238 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
/-!
# Isomorphisms
This file defines isomorphisms between objects of a category.
## Main definitions
- `structure Iso` : a bundled isomorphism between two objects of a category;
- `class IsIso` : an unbundled version of `iso`;
note that `IsIso f` is a `Prop`, and only asserts the existence of an inverse.
Of course, this inverse is unique, so it doesn't cost us much to use choice to retrieve it.
- `inv f`, for the inverse of a morphism with `[IsIso f]`
- `asIso` : convert from `IsIso` to `Iso` (noncomputable);
- `of_iso` : convert from `Iso` to `IsIso`;
- standard operations on isomorphisms (composition, inverse etc)
## Notations
- `X ≅ Y` : same as `Iso X Y`;
- `α ≪≫ β` : composition of two isomorphisms; it is called `Iso.trans`
## Tags
category, category theory, isomorphism
-/
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
/-- An isomorphism (a.k.a. an invertible morphism) between two objects of a category.
The inverse morphism is bundled.
See also `CategoryTheory.Core` for the category with the same objects and isomorphisms playing
the role of morphisms. -/
@[stacks 0017]
structure Iso {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (X Y : C) where
/-- The forward direction of an isomorphism. -/
hom : X ⟶ Y
/-- The backwards direction of an isomorphism. -/
inv : Y ⟶ X
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism is the identity on the source. -/
hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism in reverse order
is the identity on the target. -/
inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Iso.hom_inv_id Iso.inv_hom_id
/-- Notation for an isomorphism in a category. -/
infixr:10 " ≅ " => Iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace Iso
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃α β : X ≅ Y⦄ (w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
suffices α.inv = β.inv by
cases α
cases β
cases w
cases this
rfl
calc
α.inv = α.inv ≫ β.hom ≫ β.inv := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = (α.inv ≫ α.hom) ≫ β.inv := by rw [Category.assoc, ← w]
_ = β.inv := by rw [Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- Inverse isomorphism. -/
@[symm]
def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X where
hom := I.inv
inv := I.hom
@[simp]
theorem symm_hom (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.hom = α.inv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_inv (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.inv = α.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk {X Y : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id) :
Iso.symm { hom, inv, hom_inv_id := hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id := inv_hom_id } =
{ hom := inv, inv := hom, hom_inv_id := inv_hom_id, inv_hom_id := hom_inv_id } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm_eq {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.symm = α := rfl
theorem symm_bijective {X Y : C} : Function.Bijective (symm : (X ≅ Y) → _) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm_eq, symm_symm_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem symm_eq_iff {X Y : C} {α β : X ≅ Y} : α.symm = β.symm ↔ α = β :=
symm_bijective.injective.eq_iff
theorem nonempty_iso_symm (X Y : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ Y) ↔ Nonempty (Y ≅ X) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩, fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩⟩
/-- Identity isomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X where
hom := 𝟙 X
inv := 𝟙 X
instance : Inhabited (X ≅ X) := ⟨Iso.refl X⟩
theorem nonempty_iso_refl (X : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ X) := ⟨default⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm (X : C) : (Iso.refl X).symm = Iso.refl X := rfl
/-- Composition of two isomorphisms -/
@[simps]
def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z where
hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv
@[simps]
instance instTransIso : Trans (α := C) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) where
trans := trans
/-- Notation for composition of isomorphisms. -/
infixr:80 " ≪≫ " => Iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp]
theorem trans_mk {X Y Z : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id)
(hom' : Y ⟶ Z) (inv' : Z ⟶ Y) (hom_inv_id') (inv_hom_id') (hom_inv_id'') (inv_hom_id'') :
Iso.trans ⟨hom, inv, hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id⟩ ⟨hom', inv', hom_inv_id', inv_hom_id'⟩ =
⟨hom ≫ hom', inv' ≫ inv, hom_inv_id'', inv_hom_id''⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ≪≫ β).symm = β.symm ≪≫ α.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_assoc {Z' : C} (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) (γ : Z ≅ Z') :
(α ≪≫ β) ≪≫ γ = α ≪≫ β ≪≫ γ := by
ext; simp only [trans_hom, Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (α : X ≅ Y) : Iso.refl X ≪≫ α = α := by ext; apply Category.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ Iso.refl Y = α := by ext; apply Category.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm ≪≫ α = Iso.refl Y :=
ext α.inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ α.symm = Iso.refl X :=
ext α.hom_inv_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : α.symm ≪≫ α ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, symm_self_id, refl_trans]
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : X ≅ Z) : α ≪≫ α.symm ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, self_symm_id, refl_trans]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : α.inv ≫ f = g ↔ f = α.hom ≫ g :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = α.inv ≫ f ↔ α.hom ≫ g = f :=
(inv_comp_eq α.symm).symm
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.inv = g ↔ f = g ≫ α.hom :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ α.inv ↔ g ≫ α.hom = f :=
(comp_inv_eq α.symm).symm
theorem inv_eq_inv (f g : X ≅ Y) : f.inv = g.inv ↔ f.hom = g.hom :=
have : ∀ {X Y : C} (f g : X ≅ Y), f.hom = g.hom → f.inv = g.inv := fun f g h => by rw [ext h]
⟨this f.symm g.symm, this f g⟩
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : α.hom ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_inv_comp, comp_id]
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.hom = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_comp_inv, id_comp]
theorem inv_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : α.inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.hom :=
hom_comp_eq_id α.symm
| theorem comp_inv_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : f ≫ α.inv = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.hom :=
comp_hom_eq_id α.symm
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Iso.lean | 202 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual, Ico_toDual] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual, Icc_toDual] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inter_Icc_eq_singleton (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∩ Icc b c = {b} := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Iic_inter_Ici, inter_inter_inter_comm, Iic_inter_Ici]
simp [hab, hbc]
lemma Icc_eq_Icc_iff {d : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
Icc a b = Icc c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
refine ⟨fun heq ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
have h' : c ≤ d := by
by_contra contra; rw [Icc_eq_empty_iff.mpr contra, Icc_eq_empty_iff] at heq; contradiction
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_Icc] at heq
obtain ⟨-, h₁⟩ := (heq b).mp ⟨h, le_refl _⟩
| obtain ⟨h₂, -⟩ := (heq a).mp ⟨le_refl _, h⟩
obtain ⟨h₃, -⟩ := (heq c).mpr ⟨le_refl _, h'⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 845 | 846 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
/-!
# Oriented angles in right-angled triangles.
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and oriented angles in (possibly
degenerate) right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open Module
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = Real.arctan r := by
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | rfl | hr)
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = -(π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_neg _ _ hr, o.oangle_neg_right h, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h, ←
sub_eq_zero, add_comm, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
add_assoc, add_halves, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi]
simpa using h
-- Porting note: if the type is not given in `neg_neg` then Lean "forgets" about the instance
-- `Neg (Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))`
rw [← neg_inj, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, @neg_neg Real.Angle] at ha
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, oangle_rev,
(-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hr, Real.arctan_neg, Real.Angle.coe_neg, neg_neg]
· rw [zero_smul, add_zero, oangle_self, Real.arctan_zero, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· have ha : o.oangle x (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hr, o.oangle_rotation_self_right h]
rw [o.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two ha, norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map, mul_div_assoc, div_self (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h), mul_one,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos hr]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)
= Real.arctan r⁻¹ := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj, ←
neg_neg ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Real.Angle), ← rotation_neg_orientation_eq_neg, add_comm]
have hx : x = r⁻¹ • (-o).rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (r • (-o).rotation (-(π / 2 : ℝ)) x) := by simp [hr]
nth_rw 3 [hx]
refine (-o).oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two ?_ _
simp [hr, h]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle, where one side is a multiple of a
rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) = r := by
rw [o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two h, Real.Angle.tan_coe, Real.tan_arctan]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle, where one side is a multiple of a
rotation of another by `π / 2`. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) =
r⁻¹ := by
rw [o.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two h, Real.Angle.tan_coe, Real.tan_arctan]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x - x)
= Real.arctan r⁻¹ := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
have hx : -x = r⁻¹ • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) := by
simp [hr, ← Real.Angle.coe_add]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, hx, o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two]
simpa [hr] using h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, where one side is a multiple
of a rotation of another by `π / 2`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two {x : V} (h : x ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
o.oangle (x - r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x) x = Real.arctan r := by
by_cases hr : r = 0; · simp [hr]
have hx : x = r⁻¹ • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (-(r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x)) := by
simp [hr, ← Real.Angle.coe_add]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
nth_rw 3 [hx]
nth_rw 2 [hx]
rw [o.oangle_add_left_smul_rotation_pi_div_two, inv_inv]
simpa [hr] using h
end Orientation
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arccos (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arccos (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arcsin (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arcsin (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arctan (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arctan (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₂) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
| /-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.cos_coe, dist_comm p₁ p₃,
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 629 | 634 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,685 | 1,695 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
/-!
# Orientations of modules
This file defines orientations of modules.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation` is a type synonym for `Module.Ray` for the case where the module is that of
alternating maps from a module to its underlying ring. An orientation may be associated with an
alternating map or with a basis.
* `Module.Oriented` is a type class for a choice of orientation of a module that is considered
the positive orientation.
## Implementation notes
`Orientation` is defined for an arbitrary index type, but the main intended use case is when
that index type is a `Fintype` and there exists a basis of the same cardinality.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientation_(vector_space)
-/
noncomputable section
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι ι' : Type*)
/-- An orientation of a module, intended to be used when `ι` is a `Fintype` with the same
cardinality as a basis. -/
abbrev Orientation := Module.Ray R (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R)
/-- A type class fixing an orientation of a module. -/
class Module.Oriented where
/-- Fix a positive orientation. -/
positiveOrientation : Orientation R M ι
export Module.Oriented (positiveOrientation)
variable {R M}
/-- An equivalence between modules implies an equivalence between orientations. -/
def Orientation.map (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R N ι :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domLCongr R R ι R e
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.map ι e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.compLinearMap e.symm) (mt (v.compLinearEquiv_eq_zero_iff e.symm).mp hv) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_refl : (Orientation.map ι <| LinearEquiv.refl R M) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.map, AlternatingMap.domLCongr_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(Orientation.map ι e).symm = Orientation.map ι e.symm := rfl
section Reindex
variable (R M) {ι ι'}
/-- An equivalence between indices implies an equivalence between orientations. -/
def Orientation.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι') : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R M ι' :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ R e
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_apply (e : ι ≃ ι') (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.domDomCongr e) (mt (v.domDomCongr_eq_zero_iff e).mp hv) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_refl : (Orientation.reindex R M <| Equiv.refl ι) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.reindex, AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_symm (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(Orientation.reindex R M e).symm = Orientation.reindex R M e.symm :=
rfl
end Reindex
/-- A module is canonically oriented with respect to an empty index type. -/
instance (priority := 100) IsEmpty.oriented [IsEmpty ι] : Module.Oriented R M ι where
positiveOrientation :=
rayOfNeZero R (AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty 1) <|
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.injective.ne (by exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_positiveOrientation_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
Orientation.map ι f positiveOrientation = positiveOrientation := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : Orientation R M ι) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
Orientation.map ι f x = x := by
induction x using Module.Ray.ind with | h g hg =>
rw [Orientation.map_apply]
congr
ext i
rw [AlternatingMap.compLinearMap_apply]
congr
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end OrderedCommSemiring
section OrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M N : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R M] [Module R N]
@[simp]
protected theorem Orientation.map_neg {ι : Type*} (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Orientation.map ι f (-x) = -Orientation.map ι f x :=
Module.Ray.map_neg _ x
@[simp]
protected theorem Orientation.reindex_neg {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (-x) = -Orientation.reindex R M e x :=
Module.Ray.map_neg _ x
namespace Basis
variable {ι ι' : Type*}
/-- The value of `Orientation.map` when the index type has the cardinality of a basis, in terms
of `f.det`. -/
theorem map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul [Finite ι] (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι)
(f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) : Orientation.map ι f x = (LinearEquiv.det f)⁻¹ • x := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
letI := Classical.decEq ι
induction x using Module.Ray.ind with | h g hg =>
rw [Orientation.map_apply, smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff, Units.smul_def,
(g.compLinearMap f.symm).eq_smul_basis_det e, g.eq_smul_basis_det e,
AlternatingMap.compLinearMap_apply, AlternatingMap.smul_apply,
show (fun i ↦ (LinearEquiv.symm f).toLinearMap (e i)) = (LinearEquiv.symm f).toLinearMap ∘ e
by rfl, Basis.det_comp, Basis.det_self, mul_one, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul,
LinearEquiv.coe_inv_det]
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι']
/-- The orientation given by a basis. -/
protected def orientation (e : Basis ι R M) : Orientation R M ι :=
rayOfNeZero R _ e.det_ne_zero
theorem orientation_map (e : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(e.map f).orientation = Orientation.map ι f e.orientation := by
simp_rw [Basis.orientation, Orientation.map_apply, Basis.det_map']
theorem orientation_reindex (e : Basis ι R M) (eι : ι ≃ ι') :
(e.reindex eι).orientation = Orientation.reindex R M eι e.orientation := by
simp_rw [Basis.orientation, Orientation.reindex_apply, Basis.det_reindex']
/-- The orientation given by a basis derived using `units_smul`, in terms of the product of those
units. -/
theorem orientation_unitsSMul (e : Basis ι R M) (w : ι → Units R) :
(e.unitsSMul w).orientation = (∏ i, w i)⁻¹ • e.orientation := by
rw [Basis.orientation, Basis.orientation, smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff,
e.det.eq_smul_basis_det (e.unitsSMul w), det_unitsSMul_self, Units.smul_def, smul_smul]
norm_cast
simp only [inv_mul_cancel, Units.val_one, one_smul]
exact SameRay.rfl
@[simp]
theorem orientation_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
b.orientation = positiveOrientation := by
rw [Basis.orientation]
congr
exact b.det_isEmpty
end Basis
end OrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Orientation
/-- A module `M` over a linearly ordered commutative ring has precisely two "orientations" with
respect to an empty index type. (Note that these are only orientations of `M` of in the conventional
mathematical sense if `M` is zero-dimensional.) -/
theorem eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (o : Orientation R M ι) :
o = positiveOrientation ∨ o = -positiveOrientation := by
induction o using Module.Ray.ind with | h x hx =>
dsimp [positiveOrientation]
simp only [ray_eq_iff, sameRay_neg_swap]
rw [sameRay_or_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
intro h
set f : (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) ≃ₗ[R] R := AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm
have H : LinearIndependent R ![f x, 1] := by
convert h.map' f.toLinearMap f.ker
ext i
fin_cases i <;> simp [f]
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at H
simpa using H Finset.univ ![1, -f x] (by simp [Fin.sum_univ_succ]) 0 (by simp)
end Orientation
namespace Basis
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- The orientations given by two bases are equal if and only if the determinant of one basis
with respect to the other is positive. -/
theorem orientation_eq_iff_det_pos (e₁ e₂ : Basis ι R M) :
e₁.orientation = e₂.orientation ↔ 0 < e₁.det e₂ :=
calc
e₁.orientation = e₂.orientation ↔ SameRay R e₁.det e₂.det := ray_eq_iff _ _
_ ↔ SameRay R (e₁.det e₂ • e₂.det) e₂.det := by rw [← e₁.det.eq_smul_basis_det e₂]
_ ↔ 0 < e₁.det e₂ := sameRay_smul_left_iff_of_ne e₂.det_ne_zero (e₁.isUnit_det e₂).ne_zero
/-- Given a basis, any orientation equals the orientation given by that basis or its negation. -/
theorem orientation_eq_or_eq_neg (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
x = e.orientation ∨ x = -e.orientation := by
induction x using Module.Ray.ind with | h x hx =>
rw [← x.map_basis_ne_zero_iff e] at hx
rwa [Basis.orientation, ray_eq_iff, neg_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff, x.eq_smul_basis_det e,
sameRay_neg_smul_left_iff_of_ne e.det_ne_zero hx, sameRay_smul_left_iff_of_ne e.det_ne_zero hx,
lt_or_lt_iff_ne, ne_comm]
/-- Given a basis, an orientation equals the negation of that given by that basis if and only
if it does not equal that given by that basis. -/
theorem orientation_ne_iff_eq_neg (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
x ≠ e.orientation ↔ x = -e.orientation :=
⟨fun h => (e.orientation_eq_or_eq_neg x).resolve_left h, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ (Module.Ray.ne_neg_self e.orientation).symm⟩
/-- Composing a basis with a linear equiv gives the same orientation if and only if the
determinant is positive. -/
theorem orientation_comp_linearEquiv_eq_iff_det_pos (e : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
(e.map f).orientation = e.orientation ↔ 0 < LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) := by
rw [orientation_map, e.map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul, units_inv_smul, units_smul_eq_self_iff,
LinearEquiv.coe_det]
/-- Composing a basis with a linear equiv gives the negation of that orientation if and only if
the determinant is negative. -/
theorem orientation_comp_linearEquiv_eq_neg_iff_det_neg (e : Basis ι R M) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) :
(e.map f).orientation = -e.orientation ↔ LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) < 0 := by
rw [orientation_map, e.map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul, units_inv_smul, units_smul_eq_neg_iff,
LinearEquiv.coe_det]
/-- Negating a single basis vector (represented using `units_smul`) negates the corresponding
orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem orientation_neg_single (e : Basis ι R M) (i : ι) :
(e.unitsSMul (Function.update 1 i (-1))).orientation = -e.orientation := by
rw [orientation_unitsSMul, Finset.prod_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _)]
simp
/-- Given a basis and an orientation, return a basis giving that orientation: either the original
basis, or one constructed by negating a single (arbitrary) basis vector. -/
def adjustToOrientation [Nonempty ι] (e : Basis ι R M) (x : Orientation R M ι) :
Basis ι R M :=
haveI := Classical.decEq (Orientation R M ι)
if e.orientation = x then e else e.unitsSMul (Function.update 1 (Classical.arbitrary ι) (-1))
/-- `adjust_to_orientation` gives a basis with the required orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem orientation_adjustToOrientation [Nonempty ι] (e : Basis ι R M)
(x : Orientation R M ι) : (e.adjustToOrientation x).orientation = x := by
rw [adjustToOrientation]
split_ifs with h
· exact h
· rw [orientation_neg_single, eq_comm, ← orientation_ne_iff_eq_neg, ne_comm]
exact h
/-- Every basis vector from `adjust_to_orientation` is either that from the original basis or its
negation. -/
theorem adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg [Nonempty ι] (e : Basis ι R M)
(x : Orientation R M ι) (i : ι) :
e.adjustToOrientation x i = e i ∨ e.adjustToOrientation x i = -e i := by
rw [adjustToOrientation]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· by_cases hi : i = Classical.arbitrary ι <;> simp [unitsSMul_apply, hi]
theorem det_adjustToOrientation [Nonempty ι] (e : Basis ι R M)
(x : Orientation R M ι) :
(e.adjustToOrientation x).det = e.det ∨ (e.adjustToOrientation x).det = -e.det := by
dsimp [Basis.adjustToOrientation]
split_ifs
· left
rfl
· right
simp only [e.det_unitsSMul, ne_eq, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.prod_update_of_mem, not_true,
Pi.one_apply, Finset.prod_const_one, mul_one, inv_neg, inv_one, Units.val_neg, Units.val_one]
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem abs_det_adjustToOrientation [Nonempty ι] (e : Basis ι R M)
(x : Orientation R M ι) (v : ι → M) : |(e.adjustToOrientation x).det v| = |e.det v| := by
rcases e.det_adjustToOrientation x with h | h <;> simp [h]
end Basis
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable {R : Type*} [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Orientation
variable [Fintype ι]
open FiniteDimensional Module
/-- If the index type has cardinality equal to the finite dimension, any two orientations are
equal or negations. -/
theorem eq_or_eq_neg [FiniteDimensional R M] (x₁ x₂ : Orientation R M ι)
(h : Fintype.card ι = finrank R M) : x₁ = x₂ ∨ x₁ = -x₂ := by
have e := (finBasis R M).reindex (Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq h).symm
letI := Classical.decEq ι
rcases e.orientation_eq_or_eq_neg x₁ with (h₁ | h₁) <;>
rcases e.orientation_eq_or_eq_neg x₂ with (h₂ | h₂) <;> simp [h₁, h₂]
/-- If the index type has cardinality equal to the finite dimension, an orientation equals the
negation of another orientation if and only if they are not equal. -/
theorem ne_iff_eq_neg [FiniteDimensional R M] (x₁ x₂ : Orientation R M ι)
(h : Fintype.card ι = finrank R M) : x₁ ≠ x₂ ↔ x₁ = -x₂ :=
⟨fun hn => (eq_or_eq_neg x₁ x₂ h).resolve_left hn, fun he =>
he.symm ▸ (Module.Ray.ne_neg_self x₂).symm⟩
/-- The value of `Orientation.map` when the index type has cardinality equal to the finite
dimension, in terms of `f.det`. -/
theorem map_eq_det_inv_smul [FiniteDimensional R M] (x : Orientation R M ι) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M)
(h : Fintype.card ι = finrank R M) : Orientation.map ι f x = (LinearEquiv.det f)⁻¹ • x :=
haveI e := (finBasis R M).reindex (Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq h).symm
e.map_orientation_eq_det_inv_smul x f
/-- If the index type has cardinality equal to the finite dimension, composing an alternating
map with the same linear equiv on each argument gives the same orientation if and only if the
determinant is positive. -/
theorem map_eq_iff_det_pos [FiniteDimensional R M] (x : Orientation R M ι) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M)
(h : Fintype.card ι = finrank R M) :
Orientation.map ι f x = x ↔ 0 < LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· have H : finrank R M = 0 := h.symm.trans Fintype.card_eq_zero
simp [LinearMap.det_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_zero H]
rw [map_eq_det_inv_smul _ _ h, units_inv_smul, units_smul_eq_self_iff, LinearEquiv.coe_det]
/-- If the index type has cardinality equal to the finite dimension, composing an alternating
map with the same linear equiv on each argument gives the negation of that orientation if and
only if the determinant is negative. -/
theorem map_eq_neg_iff_det_neg (x : Orientation R M ι) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M)
| (h : Fintype.card ι = finrank R M) :
Orientation.map ι f x = -x ↔ LinearMap.det (f : M →ₗ[R] M) < 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· have H : finrank R M = 0 := h.symm.trans Fintype.card_eq_zero
simp [LinearMap.det_eq_one_of_finrank_eq_zero H, Module.Ray.ne_neg_self x]
have H : 0 < finrank R M := by
rw [← h]
exact Fintype.card_pos
haveI : FiniteDimensional R M := of_finrank_pos H
rw [map_eq_det_inv_smul _ _ h, units_inv_smul, units_smul_eq_neg_iff, LinearEquiv.coe_det]
/-- If the index type has cardinality equal to the finite dimension, a basis with the given
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Orientation.lean | 369 | 380 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
open Classical in
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hf, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_right_inj₀]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
have hfg := mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg
simp only [hfg, hf, hg, dite_false]
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _ |>.not
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q := by
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· simp [norm]
· simp [norm, not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq]
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hfg _ hpn
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases lt_or_le (padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg))) (padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
| inl hlt =>
exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
| inr hle =>
apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hle h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
exact if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦
hf <| equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
let i := max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg)
have hpf : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
have hpg : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) = padicNorm p (g i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
theorem norm_neg (a : PadicSeq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq <| by simp
theorem norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm := by
have : LimZero (f + g - 0) := h
have : f ≈ -g := show LimZero (f - -g) by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
have : f.norm = (-g).norm := norm_equiv this
simpa only [norm_neg] using this
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0 := mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : f + g ≈ g := show LimZero (f + g - g) by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (g - 0) := hg
have : f + g ≈ f := show LimZero (f + g - f) by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)]
else by
unfold norm at hfgne ⊢; split_ifs at hfgne ⊢
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at hfgne ⊢`
rw [lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg] at hfgne
· rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
exact padicNorm.add_eq_max_of_ne hfgne
end Embedding
end PadicSeq
/-- The `p`-adic numbers `ℚ_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
-/
def Padic (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (padicNorm p)
/-- notation for p-padic rationals -/
notation "ℚ_[" p "]" => Padic p
namespace Padic
section Completion
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance field : Field ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.field
instance : Inhabited ℚ_[p] :=
⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : CommRing ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.commRing
instance : Ring ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.ring
instance : Zero ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : One ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Add ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Mul ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Sub ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Neg ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Div ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : PadicSeq p → ℚ_[p] :=
Quotient.mk'
variable (p)
theorem zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
theorem mk_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padicNorm p) q ≈ const (padicNorm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨fun heq ↦ eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| const_limZero.1 heq, fun heq ↦ by
rw [heq]⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ Quotient.eq'.1, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
instance : CharZero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun m n ↦ by
rw [← Rat.cast_natCast]
norm_cast
exact id⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y :=
Rat.cast_add _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x :=
Rat.cast_neg _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y :=
Rat.cast_mul _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y :=
Rat.cast_sub _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y :=
Rat.cast_div _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
end Completion
end Padic
/-- The rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]` is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `‖ ‖`. -/
def padicNormE {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] : AbsoluteValue ℚ_[p] ℚ where
toFun := Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _
map_mul' q r := Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_mul
nonneg' q := Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
eq_zero' q := Quotient.inductionOn q fun r ↦ by
rw [Padic.zero_def, Quotient.eq]
exact PadicSeq.norm_zero_iff r
add_le' q r := by
trans
max ((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) q)
((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) r)
· exact Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonarchimedean
refine max_le_add_of_nonneg (Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg) ?_
exact Quotient.inductionOn r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
namespace padicNormE
section Embedding
open PadicSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem defn (f : PadicSeq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (Padic.mk f - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- `change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε` also works, but is very slow
suffices hyp : ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε by peel hyp with N; use N
by_contra! h
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := cauchy₂ f hε
rcases h N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩
have hne : ¬f - const (padicNorm p) (f i) ≈ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos h] at hge
exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε
unfold PadicSeq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge
cases _root_.le_total N (stationaryPoint hne) with
| inl hgen =>
exact hN _ hgen _ hi
| inr hngen =>
have := stationaryPoint_spec hne le_rfl hngen
rw [← this]
exact hN _ le_rfl _ hi
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) ≤ max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| norm_nonarchimedean
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padicNormE q ≠ padicNormE r → padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) = max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r fun _ _ ↦ PadicSeq.add_eq_max_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padicNormE (q : ℚ_[p]) = padicNorm p q :=
norm_const _
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padicNormE q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-n) :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun f hf ↦
have : ¬f ≈ 0 := (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf
norm_values_discrete f this
end Embedding
end padicNormE
namespace Padic
section Complete
open PadicSeq Padic
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (f : CauSeq _ (@padicNormE p _))
theorem rat_dense' (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, padicNormE (q - r : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun q' ↦
have : ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ N, ∀ n ≥ N, padicNorm p (q' m - q' n) < ε := cauchy₂ _ hε
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this
⟨q' N, by
classical
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- Porting note: this used to be `change`, but that times out.
convert_to PadicSeq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N)) < ε
rcases Decidable.em (q' - const (padicNorm p) (q' N) ≈ 0) with heq | hne'
· simpa only [heq, PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos]
· simp only [PadicSeq.norm, dif_neg hne']
change padicNorm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε
rcases Decidable.em (stationaryPoint hne' ≤ N) with hle | hle
· have := (stationaryPoint_spec hne' le_rfl hle).symm
simp only [const_apply, sub_apply, padicNorm.zero, sub_self] at this
simpa only [this]
· exact hN _ (lt_of_not_ge hle).le _ le_rfl⟩
private theorem div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < 1 / (n + 1 : ℚ) :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (mod_cast succ_pos _)
/-- `limSeq f`, for `f` a Cauchy sequence of `p`-adic numbers, is a sequence of rationals with the
same limit point as `f`. -/
def limSeq : ℕ → ℚ :=
fun n ↦ Classical.choose (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - (limSeq f i : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
refine (exists_nat_gt (1 / ε)).imp fun N hN i hi ↦ ?_
have h := Classical.choose_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i))
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h ((div_le_iff₀' <| mod_cast succ_pos _).mpr ?_)
rw [right_distrib]
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg
· exact (div_le_iff₀ hε).mp (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (mod_cast hi))
· apply le_of_lt
simpa
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) (limSeq f) := fun ε hε ↦ by
have hε3 : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3
exists max N N2
intro j hj
suffices
padicNormE (limSeq f j - f (max N N2) + (f (max N N2) - limSeq f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε by
ring_nf at this ⊢
rw [← padicNormE.eq_padic_norm']
exact mod_cast this
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· rw [← add_thirds ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· suffices padicNormE (limSeq f j - f j + (f j - f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε / 3 + ε / 3 by
simpa only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· apply _root_.add_lt_add
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
apply mod_cast hN j
exact le_of_max_le_left hj
· exact hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hj) _ (le_max_right _ _)
· apply mod_cast hN (max N N2)
apply le_max_left
private def lim' : PadicSeq p :=
⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] :=
⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (q - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
⟨lim f, fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (half_pos hε)
obtain ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padicNormE.defn (lim' f) (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨max N N2, fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel _ (lim' f i : ℚ_[p]) _]
refine (padicNormE.add_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· apply hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hi)
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN _ (le_of_max_le_left hi)⟩
theorem complete'' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - q : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete' f
refine ⟨x, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hx ε hε
refine ⟨N, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN i hi
end Complete
section NormedSpace
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Dist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y ↦ padicNormE (x - y : ℚ_[p])⟩
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y z ↦ by simpa [dist] using padicNormE.nonarchimedean' (x - y) (y - z)⟩
instance metricSpace : MetricSpace ℚ_[p] where
dist_self := by simp [dist]
dist := dist
dist_comm x y := by simp [dist, ← padicNormE.map_neg (x - y : ℚ_[p])]
dist_triangle x y z := by
dsimp [dist]
exact mod_cast padicNormE.sub_le x y z
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by
dsimp [dist]; intro _ _ h
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
apply padicNormE.eq_zero.1
exact mod_cast h
instance : Norm ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x ↦ padicNormE x⟩
instance normedField : NormedField ℚ_[p] :=
{ Padic.field,
Padic.metricSpace p with
dist_eq := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
norm_mul := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
norm := norm }
instance isAbsoluteValue : IsAbsoluteValue fun a : ℚ_[p] ↦ ‖a‖ where
abv_nonneg' := norm_nonneg
abv_eq_zero' := norm_eq_zero
abv_add' := norm_add_le
| abv_mul' := by simp [Norm.norm, map_mul]
theorem rat_dense (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, ‖q - r‖ < ε :=
let ⟨ε', hε'l, hε'r⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense' q (ε := ε') (by simpa using hε'l)
⟨r, lt_trans (by simpa [Norm.norm] using hr) hε'r⟩
end NormedSpace
end Padic
namespace padicNormE
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 734 | 745 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
/-!
# Maps equivariantly-homeomorphic to projection in a product
This file contains the definition `IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle F p`, a Prop saying that a
map `p : Z → B` between topological spaces is a "trivial fiber bundle" in the sense that there
exists a homeomorphism `h : Z ≃ₜ B × F` such that `proj x = (h x).1`. This is an abstraction which
is occasionally convenient in showing that a map is open, a quotient map, etc.
This material was formerly linked to the main definition of fiber bundles, but after a series of
refactors, there is no longer a direct connection.
-/
open Topology
variable {B : Type*} (F : Type*) {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace F]
[TopologicalSpace Z]
/-- A trivial fiber bundle with fiber `F` over a base `B` is a space `Z`
projecting on `B` for which there exists a homeomorphism to `B × F` that sends `proj`
to `Prod.fst`. -/
def IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle (proj : Z → B) : Prop :=
∃ e : Z ≃ₜ B × F, ∀ x, (e x).1 = proj x
namespace IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle
variable {F} {proj : Z → B}
protected theorem proj_eq (h : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle F proj) :
∃ e : Z ≃ₜ B × F, proj = Prod.fst ∘ e :=
⟨h.choose, (funext h.choose_spec).symm⟩
/-- The projection from a trivial fiber bundle to its base is surjective. -/
protected theorem surjective_proj [Nonempty F] (h : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle F proj) :
Function.Surjective proj := by
obtain ⟨e, rfl⟩ := h.proj_eq
| exact Prod.fst_surjective.comp e.surjective
/-- The projection from a trivial fiber bundle to its base is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous_proj (h : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle F proj) :
| Mathlib/Topology/FiberBundle/IsHomeomorphicTrivialBundle.lean | 43 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive (attr := simp) toReal_enorm]
lemma toReal_enorm' (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toReal = ‖x‖ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ofReal_norm]
lemma ofReal_norm' (x : E) : .ofReal ‖x‖ = ‖x‖ₑ := by
simp [enorm, ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal, nnnorm]
@[to_additive enorm_eq_iff_norm_eq]
theorem enorm'_eq_iff_norm_eq {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by congr⟩
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _) (norm_nonneg' _)).mp (ENNReal.coe_inj.mp h)
@[to_additive enorm_le_iff_norm_le]
theorem enorm'_le_iff_norm_le {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by gcongr⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _)] at h
exact h
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_right (a : E) : nndist a 1 = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma edist_one_right (a : E) : edist a 1 = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [edist_nndist, nndist_one_right, enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := NNReal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le]
lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ‖a ^ n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simpa [pow_succ, add_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le' norm_pow_le_mul_norm le_rfl
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le]
lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm {n : ℕ} : ‖a ^ n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ := by
simpa only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_natCast] using norm_pow_le_mul_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_abs_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_abs a n
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_natAbs_smul]
theorem nnnorm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_pow_natAbs a n
@[to_additive nnnorm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_isUnit a hn
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_left (a : E) : nndist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_one_left (a : E) : edist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_one_left]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma enorm_div_le : ‖a / b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add] using nnnorm_div_le a b
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
/-- An analogue of `nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add' (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add' _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
end NNNorm
section ENorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_zero]
lemma enorm_one' {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E] : ‖(1 : E)‖ₑ = 0 := by
rw [ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive exists_enorm_lt]
lemma exists_enorm_lt' (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
[hbot : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (1 : E))] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : ∃ x ≠ (1 : E), ‖x‖ₑ < c :=
frequently_iff_neBot.mpr hbot |>.and_eventually
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.tendsto' 1 0 (by simp) |>.eventually_lt_const hc.bot_lt)
|>.exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_neg]
lemma enorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
lemma ofReal_norm_eq_enorm' (a : E) : .ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ₑ := ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'
instance : ENorm ℝ≥0∞ where
enorm x := x
@[simp] lemma enorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0∞) : ‖x‖ₑ = x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_enorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖ₑ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub := edist_eq_enorm_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div := edist_eq_enorm_div
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_one_eq_enorm (x : E) : edist x 1 = ‖x‖ₑ := by rw [edist_eq_enorm_div, div_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm := edist_zero_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' := edist_one_eq_enorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball 1 r ↔ ‖a‖ₑ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_one_eq_enorm]
end ENorm
section ContinuousENorm
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousENorm E]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma continuous_enorm : Continuous fun a : E ↦ ‖a‖ₑ := ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → E} {s : Set X} {a : X}
@[fun_prop]
lemma Continuous.enorm : Continuous f → Continuous (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
continuous_enorm.comp
lemma ContinuousAt.enorm {a : X} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) a := by fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.enorm {s : Set X} {a : X} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) s a :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousWithinAt).comp (t := Set.univ) h
(fun _ _ ↦ by trivial)
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousOn.enorm (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (‖f ·‖ₑ) s :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousOn).comp (t := Set.univ) h <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
end ContinuousENorm
section ENormedMonoid
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
@[to_additive enorm_add_le]
lemma enorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := ENormedMonoid.enorm_mul_le a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_eq_zero]
lemma enorm_eq_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [enorm, ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive enorm_ne_zero]
lemma enorm_ne_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
enorm_eq_zero'.ne
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_pos]
lemma enorm_pos' {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ₑ ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans enorm_ne_zero'
end ENormedMonoid
instance : ENormedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0∞ where
continuous_enorm := continuous_id
enorm_eq_zero := by simp
enorm_add_le := by simp
open Set in
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds (x : E) (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 x) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y / x‖ := by
simp [NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt x |>.disjoint_iff_left, compl_setOf, eventually_iff]
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds_one (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 1) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simpa using disjoint_nhds 1 f
end SeminormedGroup
section Induced
variable (E F)
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a `SeminormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.induced [Group E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ PseudoMetricSpace.induced f toPseudoMetricSpace with
norm := fun x => ‖f x‖
dist_eq := fun x y => by simp only [map_div, ← dist_eq_norm_div]; rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a
`SeminormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddCommGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.induced
[CommGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `NormedGroup` induces a `NormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`NormedAddGroup` induces a `NormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedGroup.induced
[Group E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (h : Injective f) :
NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `NormedGroup` induces a
`NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a
`NormedCommGroup` induces a `NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.induced [CommGroup E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : Injective f) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end Induced
namespace Real
variable {r : ℝ}
instance norm : Norm ℝ where
norm r := |r|
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ = |r| :=
rfl
instance normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup ℝ :=
⟨fun _r _y => rfl⟩
theorem norm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ = r :=
abs_of_nonneg hr
theorem norm_of_nonpos (hr : r ≤ 0) : ‖r‖ = -r :=
abs_of_nonpos hr
theorem le_norm_self (r : ℝ) : r ≤ ‖r‖ :=
le_abs_self r
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖₊ = n := NNReal.eq <| norm_natCast _
@[simp 1100] lemma enorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ₑ = n := by simp [enorm]
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖ = ofNat(n) := norm_natCast n
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖₊ = ofNat(n) := nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖ = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖₊ = 2 := NNReal.eq <| by simp
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖ = q := norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm, -norm_eq_abs]
theorem nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖₊ = ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_of_nonneg hr
lemma enorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
simp [enorm, nnnorm_of_nonneg hr, ENNReal.ofReal, toNNReal, hr]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖₊ = ‖r‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖ₑ = ‖r‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, norm_of_nonneg hr]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal := enorm_eq_ofReal
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ₑ = ENNReal.ofReal |r| := by
rw [← enorm_eq_ofReal (abs_nonneg _), enorm_abs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal_abs := enorm_eq_ofReal_abs
theorem toNNReal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ‖r‖₊ := by
rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg hr]
ext
rw [coe_mk, coe_nnnorm r, Real.norm_eq_abs r, abs_of_nonneg hr]
-- Porting note: this is due to the change from `Subtype.val` to `NNReal.toReal` for the coercion
theorem ofReal_le_enorm (r : ℝ) : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ‖r‖ₑ := by
rw [enorm_eq_ofReal_abs]; gcongr; exact le_abs_self _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_le_ennnorm := ofReal_le_enorm
end Real
namespace NNReal
instance : NNNorm ℝ≥0 where
nnnorm x := x
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0) : ‖x‖₊ = x := rfl
end NNReal
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ← norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
theorem norm_multiset_sum_le {E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (m : Multiset E) :
‖m.sum‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum :=
m.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]
refine Multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[bound]
theorem norm_sum_le {ι E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∑ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
s.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le f
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_sum]
refine Finset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _ _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le s f).trans <| Finset.sum_le_sum h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f a : ι → E} {d : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) ≤ d b) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, d b := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, ← Finset.prod_div_distrib] at *
exact norm_prod_le_of_le s h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f a : ι → E) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) :=
dist_prod_prod_le_of_le s fun _ _ => le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ < r := by
rw [mem_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_iff_norm : a * b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' ball a r = ball (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_closedBall (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
(b * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall a r = closedBall (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_sphere (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' sphere a r = sphere (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_iff_norm', div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_closedBall {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ closedBall b r) :
a ^ n ∈ closedBall (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine norm_pow_le_mul_norm.trans ?_
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h n.cast_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_ball {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ∈ ball b r) : a ^ n ∈ ball (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt norm_pow_le_mul_norm ?_
replace hn : 0 < (n : ℝ) := by norm_cast
rw [nsmul_eq_mul]
nlinarith
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ closedBall (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ closedBall b r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ ball (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ ball b r := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_closedBall'' : a • closedBall b r = closedBall (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_closedBall, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, div_eq_inv_mul, ←
eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ball'' : a • ball b r = ball (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_ball, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, _root_.div_eq_inv_mul,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖₊ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖₊).sum :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
rw [Multiset.map_map]
exact norm_multiset_prod_le _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ a ∈ s, f a‖₊ ≤ ∑ a ∈ s, ‖f a‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
exact norm_prod_le _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖₊ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖₊ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le_of_le s h).trans_eq (NNReal.coe_sum ..).symm
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the LHS doesn't simplify
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) norm_norm]
lemma norm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖ = ‖x‖ := Real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg' _)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_norm]
lemma nnnorm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_norm]
lemma enorm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖ₑ = ‖x‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
lemma enorm_enorm {ε : Type*} [ENorm ε] (x : ε) : ‖‖x‖ₑ‖ₑ = ‖x‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
end SeminormedCommGroup
section NormedGroup
variable [NormedGroup E] {a b : E}
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_le_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_pos_iff]
lemma norm_pos_iff' : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := by rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_zero]
lemma norm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := (norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'
@[to_additive norm_ne_zero_iff]
lemma norm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_eq_zero'.not
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_le_zero_iff'' := norm_le_zero_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_le_zero_iff''' := norm_le_zero_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_pos_iff'' := norm_pos_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_eq_zero'' := norm_eq_zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_eq_zero''' := norm_eq_zero'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_eq_zero_iff : ‖a / b‖ = 0 ↔ a = b := by rw [norm_eq_zero', div_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_pos_iff : 0 < ‖a / b‖ ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [(norm_nonneg' _).lt_iff_ne, ne_comm]
exact norm_div_eq_zero_iff.not
@[to_additive eq_of_norm_sub_le_zero]
theorem eq_of_norm_div_le_zero (h : ‖a / b‖ ≤ 0) : a = b := by
rwa [← div_eq_one, ← norm_le_zero_iff']
alias ⟨eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero, _⟩ := norm_div_eq_zero_iff
attribute [to_additive] eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_norm_pos (a : E) : a = 1 ∨ 0 < ‖a‖ := by
simpa [eq_comm] using (norm_nonneg' a).eq_or_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_nnnorm_pos (a : E) : a = 1 ∨ 0 < ‖a‖₊ :=
eq_one_or_norm_pos a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_eq_zero]
theorem nnnorm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖₊ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_eq_zero, coe_nnnorm', norm_eq_zero']
@[to_additive nnnorm_ne_zero_iff]
theorem nnnorm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
nnnorm_eq_zero'.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_pos]
lemma nnnorm_pos' : 0 < ‖a‖₊ ↔ a ≠ 1 := pos_iff_ne_zero.trans nnnorm_ne_zero_iff'
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a normed group as a group norm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a normed group as an additive group norm."]
def normGroupNorm : GroupNorm E :=
{ normGroupSeminorm _ with eq_one_of_map_eq_zero' := fun _ => norm_eq_zero'.1 }
@[simp]
theorem coe_normGroupNorm : ⇑(normGroupNorm E) = norm :=
rfl
end NormedGroup
section NormedAddGroup
variable [NormedAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → E}
/-! Some relations with `HasCompactSupport` -/
theorem hasCompactSupport_norm_iff : (HasCompactSupport fun x => ‖f x‖) ↔ HasCompactSupport f :=
hasCompactSupport_comp_left norm_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, HasCompactSupport.norm⟩ := hasCompactSupport_norm_iff
end NormedAddGroup
lemma tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop : Tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) atTop atTop := tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
/-! ### `positivity` extensions -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are always nonnegative, and positive
on non-one inputs. -/
@[positivity ‖_‖]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $E $_n $a) =>
let _seminormedGroup_E ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $E)
assertInstancesCommute
-- Check whether we are in a normed group and whether the context contains a `a ≠ 1` assumption
let o : Option (Q(NormedGroup $E) × Q($a ≠ 1)) := ← do
let .some normedGroup_E ← trySynthInstanceQ q(NormedGroup $E) | return none
let some pa ← findLocalDeclWithTypeQ? q($a ≠ 1) | return none
return some (normedGroup_E, pa)
match o with
-- If so, return a proof of `0 < ‖a‖`
| some (_normedGroup_E, pa) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(norm_pos_iff'.2 $pa)
-- Else, return a proof of `0 ≤ ‖a‖`
| none => return .nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not `‖·‖`"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are always nonnegative, and positive
on non-zero inputs. -/
@[positivity ‖_‖]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $E $_n $a) =>
let _seminormedAddGroup_E ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $E)
assertInstancesCommute
-- Check whether we are in a normed group and whether the context contains a `a ≠ 0` assumption
let o : Option (Q(NormedAddGroup $E) × Q($a ≠ 0)) := ← do
let .some normedAddGroup_E ← trySynthInstanceQ q(NormedAddGroup $E) | return none
let some pa ← findLocalDeclWithTypeQ? q($a ≠ 0) | return none
return some (normedAddGroup_E, pa)
match o with
-- If so, return a proof of `0 < ‖a‖`
| some (_normedAddGroup_E, pa) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(norm_pos_iff.2 $pa)
-- Else, return a proof of `0 ≤ ‖a‖`
| none => return .nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not `‖·‖`"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,488 | 1,489 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
/-!
# Connected subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define connected subsets of a topological spaces and various other properties and
classes related to connectivity.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsConnected`: a nonempty set that has no non-trivial open partition.
See also the section below in the module doc.
* `connectedComponent` is the connected component of an element in the space.
We also have a class stating that the whole space satisfies that property: `ConnectedSpace`
## On the definition of connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreconnected`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
/-- If any two points of a set are contained in a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
/-- A union of a family of preconnected sets with a common point is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
theorem IsConnected.union {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (Hs : IsConnected s)
(Ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, ?_⟩
exact Hs.isPreconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Ht.isPreconnected
/-- The directed sUnion of a set S of preconnected subsets is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed {S : Set (Set α)} (K : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ S) := by
rintro u v hu hv Huv ⟨a, ⟨s, hsS, has⟩, hau⟩ ⟨b, ⟨t, htS, hbt⟩, hbv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hrS, hsr, htr⟩ : ∃ r ∈ S, s ⊆ r ∧ t ⊆ r := K s hsS t htS
have Hnuv : (r ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty :=
H _ hrS u v hu hv ((subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS).trans Huv) ⟨a, hsr has, hau⟩ ⟨b, htr hbt, hbv⟩
have Kruv : r ∩ (u ∩ v) ⊆ ⋃₀ S ∩ (u ∩ v) := inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS)
exact Hnuv.mono Kruv
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
let R := fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t
have P : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen R i j →
∃ p, p ⊆ t ∧ i ∈ p ∧ j ∈ p ∧ IsPreconnected (⋃ j ∈ p, s j) := fun i hi j hj h => by
induction h with
| refl =>
refine ⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hi, mem_singleton i, mem_singleton i, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_singleton]
exact H i hi
| @tail j k _ hjk ih =>
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := ih hjk.2
refine ⟨insert k p, insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hj, hpt⟩, mem_insert_of_mem k hip,
mem_insert k p, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_insert]
refine (H k hj).union' (hjk.1.mono ?_) hp
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hjp)
refine isPreconnected_of_forall_pair ?_
intro x hx y hy
obtain ⟨i : ι, hi : i ∈ t, hxi : x ∈ s i⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hx
obtain ⟨j : ι, hj : j ∈ t, hyj : y ∈ s j⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hy
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := P i hi j hj (K i hi j hj)
exact ⟨⋃ j ∈ p, s j, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hpt, mem_biUnion hip hxi,
mem_biUnion hjp hyj, hp⟩
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(ht : t.Nonempty) (H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨ht.some, ht.some_mem, (H _ ht.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
/-- Preconnectedness of the iUnion of a family of preconnected sets
indexed by the vertices of a preconnected graph,
where two vertices are joined when the corresponding sets intersect. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) := by
rw [← biUnion_univ]
exact IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i _ => H i) fun i _ j _ => by
simpa [mem_univ] using K i j
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_iUnion.2 <| Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun i : ι => ⟨i, (H _).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i => (H i).isPreconnected) K⟩
section SuccOrder
open Order
variable [LinearOrder β] [SuccOrder β] [IsSuccArchimedean β]
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is connected. -/
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_chain [Nonempty β] {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of preconnected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (ht : OrdConnected t)
(H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
have h1 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj (Ico_subset_Icc_self hk)
have h2 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → succ k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj ⟨hk.1.trans <| le_succ _, succ_le_of_lt hk.2⟩
have h3 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → (s k ∩ s (succ k)).Nonempty :=
fun hi hj hk => K _ (h1 hi hj hk) (h2 hi hj hk)
refine IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun i hi j hj => ?_
exact reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun k hk => ⟨h3 hi hj hk, h1 hi hj hk⟩) fun k hk =>
⟨by rw [inter_comm]; exact h3 hj hi hk, h2 hj hi hk⟩
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (hnt : t.Nonempty)
(ht : OrdConnected t) (H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨hnt.some, hnt.some_mem, (H _ hnt.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain ht (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
end SuccOrder
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a preconnected set and its closure, then it is
preconnected as well. See also `IsConnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsPreconnected t :=
fun u v hu hv htuv ⟨_y, hyt, hyu⟩ ⟨_z, hzt, hzv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hyt) u hu hyu
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hzt) v hv hzv
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (Subset.trans Kst htuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩
⟨r, Kst hrs, hruv⟩
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a connected set and its closure, then it is
connected as well. See also `IsPreconnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsConnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsConnected t :=
⟨Nonempty.mono Kst H.left, IsPreconnected.subset_closure H.right Kst Ktcs⟩
/-- The closure of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s) :
IsPreconnected (closure s) :=
IsPreconnected.subset_closure H subset_closure Subset.rfl
/-- The closure of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) : IsConnected (closure s) :=
IsConnected.subset_closure H subset_closure <| Subset.rfl
/-- The image of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) := by
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintro u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v' := by
rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv
replace huv := subset_inter huv Subset.rfl
rw [union_inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← union_inter_distrib_right] at huv
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹IsPreconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).Nonempty := by
refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, ?_⟩ ⟨y, ?_⟩ <;> rw [inter_comm]
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩]
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc, inter_comm s, inter_comm s,
← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
/-- The image of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) (f : α → β)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsConnected (f '' s) :=
⟨image_nonempty.mpr H.nonempty, H.isPreconnected.image f hf⟩
theorem isPreconnected_closed_iff {s : Set α} :
IsPreconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', IsClosed t → IsClosed t' →
s ⊆ t ∪ t' → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → (s ∩ t').Nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).Nonempty :=
⟨by
rintro h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xt' : x ∉ t' := (h' xs).resolve_left (absurd xt)
have yt : y ∉ t := (h' ys).resolve_right (absurd yt')
have := h _ _ ht.isOpen_compl ht'.isOpen_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty htt'.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq,
by
rintro h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xv : x ∉ v := (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id
have yu : y ∉ u := (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv)
have := h _ _ hu.isClosed_compl hv.isClosed_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty huv.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPreconnected_image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : IsInducing f) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) ↔ IsPreconnected s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.image _ hf.continuous.continuousOn⟩
rintro u v hu' hv' huv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hu' with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hv' with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
replace huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v := by rwa [image_subset_iff]
rcases h u v hu hv huv ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hys, hyv⟩ with
⟨_, ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩, hzuv⟩
exact ⟨z, hzs, hzuv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPreconnected_image := IsInducing.isPreconnected_image
/- TODO: The following lemmas about connection of preimages hold more generally for strict maps
(the quotient and subspace topologies of the image agree) whose fibers are preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) := fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f)
(hsf : s ⊆ range f) : IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2 fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_or_subset (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v) (huv : Disjoint u v)
(hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hs : IsPreconnected s) : s ⊆ u ∨ s ⊆ v := by
specialize hs u v hu hv hsuv
obtain hsu | hsu := (s ∩ u).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact Or.inr ((Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.2 hsu).subset_right_of_subset_union hsuv)
· replace hs := mt (hs hsu)
simp_rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 huv] at hs
exact Or.inl ((hs s.disjoint_empty).subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_left_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsu : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ u :=
Disjoint.subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv
(by
by_contra hsv
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] at hsv
obtain ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := hs u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 huv hx)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_right_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsv : (s ∩ v).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ v :=
hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hv hu huv.symm (union_comm u v ▸ hsuv) hsv
/-- If a preconnected set `s` intersects an open set `u`, and limit points of `u` inside `s` are
contained in `u`, then the whole set `s` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_of_closure_inter_subset (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hu : IsOpen u)
(h'u : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (h : closure u ∩ s ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u := by
have A : s ⊆ u ∪ (closure u)ᶜ := by
intro x hx
by_cases xu : x ∈ u
· exact Or.inl xu
· right
intro h'x
exact xu (h (mem_inter h'x hx))
apply hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hu isClosed_closure.isOpen_compl _ A h'u
exact disjoint_compl_right.mono_right (compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure)
theorem IsPreconnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ×ˢ t) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Prod.mk a₁ '' t ∪ flip Prod.mk b₂ '' s, ?_, .inl ⟨b₁, hb₁, rfl⟩, .inr ⟨a₂, ha₂, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro _ (⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ | ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨ha₁, hy⟩, ⟨hx, hb₂⟩]
· exact (ht.image _ (by fun_prop)).union (a₁, b₂) ⟨b₂, hb₂, rfl⟩
⟨a₁, ha₁, rfl⟩ (hs.image _ (Continuous.prodMk_left _).continuousOn)
theorem IsConnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
(ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ×ˢ t) :=
⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
theorem isPreconnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)}
(hs : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (pi univ s) := by
rintro u v uo vo hsuv ⟨f, hfs, hfu⟩ ⟨g, hgs, hgv⟩
classical
rcases exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds (uo.mem_nhds hfu) g with ⟨I, hI⟩
induction I using Finset.induction_on with
| empty =>
refine ⟨g, hgs, ⟨?_, hgv⟩⟩
simpa using hI
| insert i I _ ihI =>
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert] at hI
have := I.piecewise_mem_set_pi hfs hgs
refine (hsuv this).elim ihI fun h => ?_
set S := update (I.piecewise f g) i '' s i
have hsub : S ⊆ pi univ s := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun z hz => ?_
rwa [update_preimage_univ_pi]
exact fun j _ => this j trivial
have hconn : IsPreconnected S :=
(hs i).image _ (continuous_const.update i continuous_id).continuousOn
have hSu : (S ∩ u).Nonempty := ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ (hfs _ trivial), hI⟩
have hSv : (S ∩ v).Nonempty := ⟨_, ⟨_, this _ trivial, update_eq_self _ _⟩, h⟩
refine (hconn u v uo vo (hsub.trans hsuv) hSu hSv).mono ?_
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ hsub
@[simp]
theorem isConnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
IsConnected (pi univ s) ↔ ∀ i, IsConnected (s i) := by
simp only [IsConnected, ← univ_pi_nonempty_iff, forall_and, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun hne => ⟨fun hc i => ?_, isPreconnected_univ_pi⟩
rw [← eval_image_univ_pi hne]
exact hc.image _ (continuous_apply _).continuousOn
/-- The connected component of a point is the maximal connected set
that contains this point. -/
def connectedComponent (x : α) : Set α :=
⋃₀ { s : Set α | IsPreconnected s ∧ x ∈ s }
open Classical in
/-- Given a set `F` in a topological space `α` and a point `x : α`, the connected
component of `x` in `F` is the connected component of `x` in the subtype `F` seen as
a set in `α`. This definition does not make sense if `x` is not in `F` so we return the
empty set in this case. -/
def connectedComponentIn (F : Set α) (x : α) : Set α :=
if h : x ∈ F then (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) else ∅
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_image {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) :=
dif_pos h
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_empty {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = ∅ :=
dif_neg h
theorem mem_connectedComponent {x : α} : x ∈ connectedComponent x :=
mem_sUnion_of_mem (mem_singleton x) ⟨isPreconnected_singleton, mem_singleton x⟩
theorem mem_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hx : x ∈ F) :
x ∈ connectedComponentIn F x := by
simp [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, mem_connectedComponent, hx]
theorem connectedComponent_nonempty {x : α} : (connectedComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
(connectedComponentIn F x).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp [connectedComponent_nonempty, *]
theorem connectedComponentIn_subset (F : Set α) (x : α) : connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsPreconnected (connectedComponent x) :=
isPreconnected_sUnion x _ (fun _ => And.right) fun _ => And.left
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsPreconnected (connectedComponentIn F x) := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]; split_ifs
· exact IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mpr isPreconnected_connectedComponent
· exact isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsConnected (connectedComponent x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩, isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
theorem isConnected_connectedComponentIn_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsConnected (connectedComponentIn F x) ↔ x ∈ F := by
simp_rw [← connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff, IsConnected, isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn,
and_true]
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsPreconnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x := fun _z hz => mem_sUnion_of_mem hz ⟨H1, H2⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ connectedComponentIn F x := by
have : IsPreconnected (((↑) : F → α) ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mp ?_
rwa [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
have h2xs : (⟨x, hsF hxs⟩ : F) ∈ (↑) ⁻¹' s := by
rw [mem_preimage]
exact hxs
have := this.subset_connectedComponent h2xs
rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image (hsF hxs)]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (image_subset _ this)
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
theorem IsConnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsConnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
H1.2.subset_connectedComponent H2
theorem IsPreconnected.connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected F)
(hx : x ∈ F) : connectedComponentIn F x = F :=
(connectedComponentIn_subset F x).antisymm (h.subset_connectedComponentIn hx subset_rfl)
theorem connectedComponent_eq {x y : α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponent x) :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset (isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent
(Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset mem_connectedComponent
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)))
theorem connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem {x y : α} :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y ↔ x ∈ connectedComponent y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_connectedComponent, fun h => (connectedComponent_eq h).symm⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq {x y : α} {F : Set α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponentIn F x) :
connectedComponentIn F x = connectedComponentIn F y := by
have hx : x ∈ F := connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff.mp ⟨y, h⟩
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, h2y, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hy, connectedComponent_eq h2y]
theorem connectedComponentIn_univ (x : α) : connectedComponentIn univ x = connectedComponent x :=
subset_antisymm
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.subset_connectedComponent <|
mem_connectedComponentIn trivial)
(isPreconnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponentIn mem_connectedComponent <|
subset_univ _)
theorem connectedComponent_disjoint {x y : α} (h : connectedComponent x ≠ connectedComponent y) :
Disjoint (connectedComponent x) (connectedComponent y) :=
Set.disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 =>
h ((connectedComponent_eq h1).trans (connectedComponent_eq h2).symm)
theorem isClosed_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsClosed (connectedComponent x) :=
closure_subset_iff_isClosed.1 <|
isConnected_connectedComponent.closure.subset_connectedComponent <|
subset_closure mem_connectedComponent
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) (a : α) : f '' connectedComponent a ⊆ connectedComponent (f a) :=
(isConnected_connectedComponent.image f h.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponent
((mem_image f (connectedComponent a) (f a)).2 ⟨a, mem_connectedComponent, rfl⟩)
theorem Continuous.image_connectedComponentIn_subset [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
{a : α} (hf : Continuous f) (hx : a ∈ s) :
f '' connectedComponentIn s a ⊆ connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a) :=
(isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn.image _ hf.continuousOn).subset_connectedComponentIn
(mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_connectedComponentIn hx)
(image_subset _ <| connectedComponentIn_subset _ _)
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponent [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f)
(a : α) : MapsTo f (connectedComponent a) (connectedComponent (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| h.image_connectedComponent_subset a
theorem Continuous.mapsTo_connectedComponentIn [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : Continuous f) {a : α} (hx : a ∈ s) :
MapsTo f (connectedComponentIn s a) (connectedComponentIn (f '' s) (f a)) :=
mapsTo'.2 <| image_connectedComponentIn_subset h hx
theorem irreducibleComponent_subset_connectedComponent {x : α} :
irreducibleComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
isIrreducible_irreducibleComponent.isConnected.subset_connectedComponent mem_irreducibleComponent
@[mono]
theorem connectedComponentIn_mono (x : α) {F G : Set α} (h : F ⊆ G) :
connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ connectedComponentIn G x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ F
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, connectedComponentIn_eq_image (h hx), ←
show ((↑) : G → α) ∘ inclusion h = (↑) from rfl, image_comp]
exact image_subset _ ((continuous_inclusion h).image_connectedComponent_subset ⟨x, hx⟩)
· rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_empty hx]
exact Set.empty_subset _
/-- A preconnected space is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class PreconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The universal set `Set.univ` in a preconnected space is a preconnected set. -/
isPreconnected_univ : IsPreconnected (univ : Set α)
export PreconnectedSpace (isPreconnected_univ)
/-- A connected space is a nonempty one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
class ConnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop extends PreconnectedSpace α where
/-- A connected space is nonempty. -/
toNonempty : Nonempty α
attribute [instance 50] ConnectedSpace.toNonempty -- see Note [lower instance priority]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
theorem isConnected_univ [ConnectedSpace α] : IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨univ_nonempty, isPreconnected_univ⟩
lemma preconnectedSpace_iff_univ : PreconnectedSpace α ↔ IsPreconnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma connectedSpace_iff_univ : ConnectedSpace α ↔ IsConnected (univ : Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨univ_nonempty, h.1.1⟩,
fun h ↦ ConnectedSpace.mk (toPreconnectedSpace := ⟨h.2⟩) ⟨h.1.some⟩⟩
theorem isPreconnected_range [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] {f : α → β}
(h : Continuous f) : IsPreconnected (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ isPreconnected_univ.image _ h.continuousOn
theorem isConnected_range [TopologicalSpace β] [ConnectedSpace α] {f : α → β} (h : Continuous f) :
IsConnected (range f) :=
⟨range_nonempty f, isPreconnected_range h⟩
theorem Function.Surjective.connectedSpace [ConnectedSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : ConnectedSpace β := by
rw [connectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isConnected_range hf'
instance Quotient.instConnectedSpace {s : Setoid α} [ConnectedSpace α] :
ConnectedSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quotient.mk'_surjective.connectedSpace continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem DenseRange.preconnectedSpace [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] {f : α → β}
(hf : DenseRange f) (hc : Continuous f) : PreconnectedSpace β :=
⟨hf.closure_eq ▸ (isPreconnected_range hc).closure⟩
theorem connectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent :
ConnectedSpace α ↔ ∃ x : α, connectedComponent x = univ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
exact
⟨x, eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| isPreconnected_univ.subset_connectedComponent (mem_univ x)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, h⟩
haveI : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨by rw [← h]; exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
exact ⟨⟨x⟩⟩
theorem preconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent :
PreconnectedSpace α ↔ ∀ x : α, connectedComponent x = univ := by
constructor
· intro h x
exact eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| isPreconnected_univ.subset_connectedComponent (mem_univ x)
· intro h
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· exact ⟨by rw [univ_eq_empty_iff.mpr hα]; exact isPreconnected_empty⟩
· exact ⟨by rw [← h (Classical.choice hα)]; exact isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
@[simp]
theorem PreconnectedSpace.connectedComponent_eq_univ {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[h : PreconnectedSpace X] (x : X) : connectedComponent x = univ :=
preconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent.mp h x
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [PreconnectedSpace α] [PreconnectedSpace β] :
PreconnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨by
rw [← univ_prod_univ]
exact isPreconnected_univ.prod isPreconnected_univ⟩
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [ConnectedSpace α] [ConnectedSpace β] : ConnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, PreconnectedSpace (π i)] :
PreconnectedSpace (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨by rw [← pi_univ univ]; exact isPreconnected_univ_pi fun i => isPreconnected_univ⟩
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, ConnectedSpace (π i)] : ConnectedSpace (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PreirreducibleSpace.preconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
[PreirreducibleSpace α] : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨isPreirreducible_univ.isPreconnected⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IrreducibleSpace.connectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α]
[IrreducibleSpace α] : ConnectedSpace α where toNonempty := IrreducibleSpace.toNonempty
theorem Subtype.preconnectedSpace {s : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected s) : PreconnectedSpace s where
isPreconnected_univ := by
rwa [← IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image, image_univ, Subtype.range_val]
theorem Subtype.connectedSpace {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : ConnectedSpace s where
toPreconnectedSpace := Subtype.preconnectedSpace h.isPreconnected
toNonempty := h.nonempty.to_subtype
theorem isPreconnected_iff_preconnectedSpace {s : Set α} : IsPreconnected s ↔ PreconnectedSpace s :=
⟨Subtype.preconnectedSpace, fun h => by
simpa using isPreconnected_univ.image ((↑) : s → α) continuous_subtype_val.continuousOn⟩
theorem isConnected_iff_connectedSpace {s : Set α} : IsConnected s ↔ ConnectedSpace s :=
⟨Subtype.connectedSpace, fun h =>
⟨nonempty_subtype.mp h.2, isPreconnected_iff_preconnectedSpace.mpr h.1⟩⟩
end Preconnected
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 1,233 | 1,236 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.OrderedMonoid
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
/-!
# Prime factors of nonzero naturals
This file defines the factorization of a nonzero natural number `n` as a multiset of primes,
the multiplicity of `p` in this factors multiset being the p-adic valuation of `n`.
## Main declarations
* `PrimeMultiset`: Type of multisets of prime numbers.
* `FactorMultiset n`: Multiset of prime factors of `n`.
-/
/-- The type of multisets of prime numbers. Unique factorization
gives an equivalence between this set and ℕ+, as we will formalize
below. -/
def PrimeMultiset :=
Multiset Nat.Primes deriving Inhabited, AddCommMonoid, DistribLattice,
SemilatticeSup, Sub
-- The `CanonicallyOrderedAdd, OrderBot, OrderedSub` instances should be constructed by a deriving
-- handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (CanonicallyOrderedAdd (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderBot PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderedSub PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (Multiset Nat.Primes))
namespace PrimeMultiset
-- `@[derive]` doesn't work for `meta` instances
unsafe instance : Repr PrimeMultiset := by delta PrimeMultiset; infer_instance
/-- The multiset consisting of a single prime -/
def ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : PrimeMultiset :=
({p} : Multiset Nat.Primes)
theorem card_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : Multiset.card (ofPrime p) = 1 :=
rfl
/-- We can forget the primality property and regard a multiset
of primes as just a multiset of positive integers, or a multiset
of natural numbers. In the opposite direction, if we have a
multiset of positive integers or natural numbers, together with
a proof that all the elements are prime, then we can regard it
as a multiset of primes. The next block of results records
obvious properties of these coercions.
-/
def toNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coeNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨toNatMultiset⟩
/-- `PrimeMultiset.coe`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of
naturals, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeNatMonoidHom : (coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_nat_injective
theorem coeNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ) = {(p : ℕ)} :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
/-- Converts a `PrimeMultiset` to a `Multiset ℕ+`. -/
def toPNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coePNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ+) :=
⟨toPNatMultiset⟩
/-- `coePNat`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of positive
naturals, regarded as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ+ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coePNatMonoidHom : (coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_injective
theorem coePNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ+) = {(p : ℕ+)} :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ+) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ+)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
instance coeMultisetPNatNat : Coe (Multiset ℕ+) (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨fun v => v.map (↑)⟩
theorem coePNat_nat (v : PrimeMultiset) : ((v : Multiset ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ) := by
change (v.map ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+)).map Subtype.val = v.map Subtype.val
rw [Multiset.map_map]
congr
/-- The product of a `PrimeMultiset`, as a `ℕ+`. -/
def prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : ℕ+ :=
(v : Multiset PNat).prod
theorem coe_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : (v.prod : ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ).prod := by
have h : (v.prod : ℕ) = ((v.map (↑) : Multiset ℕ+).map (↑)).prod :=
PNat.coeMonoidHom.map_multiset_prod v.toPNatMultiset
simpa [Multiset.map_map] using h
theorem prod_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p).prod = (p : ℕ+) :=
Multiset.prod_singleton _
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ Nat.Primes Nat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨p, hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) : (ofNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ) = v := by
dsimp [ofNatMultiset, toNatMultiset]
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id']
theorem prod_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) :
((ofNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ) = (v.prod : ℕ) := by rw [coe_prod, to_ofNatMultiset]
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ+ Nat.Primes PNat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨(p : ℕ), hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ+) = v := by
dsimp [ofPNatMultiset, toPNatMultiset]
have : (fun (p : ℕ+) (h : p.Prime) => ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) ⟨p, h⟩) = fun p _ => id p := by
funext p h
apply Subtype.eq
rfl
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, this, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id]
theorem prod_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : ((ofPNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ+) = v.prod := by
dsimp [prod]
rw [to_ofPNatMultiset]
/-- Lists can be coerced to multisets; here we have some results
about how this interacts with our constructions on multisets. -/
def ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
theorem prod_ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h) : ((ofNatList l h).prod : ℕ) = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- If a `List ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset` with
the coercion from lists to multisets. -/
def ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
theorem prod_ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatList l h).prod = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- The product map gives a homomorphism from the additive monoid
of multisets to the multiplicative monoid ℕ+. -/
theorem prod_zero : (0 : PrimeMultiset).prod = 1 := by
exact Multiset.prod_zero
theorem prod_add (u v : PrimeMultiset) : (u + v).prod = u.prod * v.prod := by
change (coePNatMonoidHom (u + v)).prod = _
rw [coePNatMonoidHom.map_add]
exact Multiset.prod_add _ _
theorem prod_smul (d : ℕ) (u : PrimeMultiset) : (d • u).prod = u.prod ^ d := by
induction d with
| zero => simp only [zero_nsmul, pow_zero, prod_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [succ_nsmul, prod_add, ih, pow_succ]
end PrimeMultiset
namespace PNat
/-- The prime factors of n, regarded as a multiset -/
def factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) : PrimeMultiset :=
PrimeMultiset.ofNatList (Nat.primeFactorsList n) (@Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList n)
/-- The product of the factors is the original number -/
theorem prod_factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) : (factorMultiset n).prod = n :=
| eq <| by
dsimp [factorMultiset]
rw [PrimeMultiset.prod_ofNatList]
exact Nat.prod_primeFactorsList n.ne_zero
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Factors.lean | 207 | 210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma nnnorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖₊ = ‖z‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma enorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ₑ = ‖z‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
instance (priority := 100) : CStarRing K where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| ((norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_conj _)).symm
instance : StarModule ℝ K where
star_smul r a := by
apply RCLike.ext <;> simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im]
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ((q : ℝ) : K) = q := map_nnratCast (algebraMap ℝ K) _
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
natCast_re n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (ofNat(n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
| @[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 556 | 558 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.AffineMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
/-!
# The mean value inequality and equalities
In this file we prove the following facts:
* `Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le` : if `f` is differentiable on a convex set `s`
and the norm of its derivative is bounded by `C`, then `f` is Lipschitz continuous on `s` with
constant `C`; also a variant in which what is bounded by `C` is the norm of the difference of the
derivative from a fixed linear map. This lemma and its versions are formulated using `RCLike`,
so they work both for real and complex derivatives.
* `image_le_of*`, `image_norm_le_of_*` : several similar lemmas deducing `f x ≤ B x` or
`‖f x‖ ≤ B x` from upper estimates on `f'` or `‖f'‖`, respectively. These lemmas differ by
their assumptions:
* `of_liminf_*` lemmas assume that limit inferior of some ratio is less than `B' x`;
* `of_deriv_right_*`, `of_norm_deriv_right_*` lemmas assume that the right derivative
or its norm is less than `B' x`;
* `of_*_lt_*` lemmas assume a strict inequality whenever `f x = B x` or `‖f x‖ = B x`;
* `of_*_le_*` lemmas assume a non-strict inequality everywhere on `[a, b)`;
* name of a lemma ends with `'` if (1) it assumes that `B` is continuous on `[a, b]`
and has a right derivative at every point of `[a, b)`, and (2) the lemma has
a counterpart assuming that `B` is differentiable everywhere on `ℝ`
* `norm_image_sub_le_*_segment` : if derivative of `f` on `[a, b]` is bounded above
by a constant `C`, then `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * ‖x - a‖`; several versions deal with
right derivative and derivative within `[a, b]` (`HasDerivWithinAt` or `derivWithin`).
* `Convex.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero` : if a function has derivative `0` on a convex set `s`,
then it is a constant on `s`.
* `hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt` : a C^1 function over the reals is
strictly differentiable. (This is a corollary of the mean value inequality.)
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-! ### One-dimensional fencing inequalities -/
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
change Icc a b ⊆ { x | f x ≤ B x }
set s := { x | f x ≤ B x } ∩ Icc a b
have A : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x, B x)) (Icc a b) := hf.prodMk hB
have : IsClosed s := by
simp only [s, inter_comm]
exact A.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed isClosed_Icc OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'
apply this.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxB : f x ≤ B x, xab⟩ y hy
rcases hxB.lt_or_eq with hxB | hxB
· -- If `f x < B x`, then all we need is continuity of both sides
refine nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem ?_ (Ioc_mem_nhdsGT hy))
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[Icc a b] x, f x < B x :=
A x (Ico_subset_Icc_self xab) (IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd) hxB)
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] x, f x < B x := nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem xab) this
exact this.mono fun y => le_of_lt
· rcases exists_between (bound x xab hxB) with ⟨r, hfr, hrB⟩
specialize hf' x xab r hfr
have HB : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, r < slope B x z :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' <| lt_irrefl x).1 (hB' x xab).Ioi_of_Ici
(Ioi_mem_nhds hrB)
obtain ⟨z, hfz, hzB, hz⟩ : ∃ z, slope f x z < r ∧ r < slope B x z ∧ z ∈ Ioc x y :=
hf'.and_eventually (HB.and (Ioc_mem_nhdsGT hy)) |>.exists
refine ⟨z, ?_, hz⟩
have := (hfz.trans hzB).le
rwa [slope_def_field, slope_def_field, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (sub_pos.2 hz.1), hxB,
sub_le_sub_iff_right] at this
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by `B'`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) {B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
-- `bound` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ B' x`
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, B' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
have Hr : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∀ r > 0, f x ≤ B x + r * (x - a) := fun x hx r hr => by
apply image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf bound
· rwa [sub_self, mul_zero, add_zero]
· exact hB.add (continuousOn_const.mul (continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const))
· intro x hx
exact (hB' x hx).add (((hasDerivWithinAt_id x (Ici x)).sub_const a).const_mul r)
· intro x _ _
rw [mul_one]
exact (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 hr
exact hx
intro x hx
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => B x + r * (x - a)) (Ioi 0) 0 :=
continuousWithinAt_const.add (continuousWithinAt_id.mul continuousWithinAt_const)
convert continuousWithinAt_const.closure_le _ this (Hr x hx) using 1 <;> simp
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x ≤ B' x` on `[a, b)`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f' x ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary hf ha hB hB' fun x hx _ hr =>
(hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le (lt_of_le_of_lt (bound x hx) hr)
/-! ### Vector-valued functions `f : ℝ → E` -/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ}
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope (norm ∘ f) x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) hf' ha hB
hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` and `B` have right derivatives `f'` and `B'` respectively at every point of `[a, b)`;
* the norm of `f'` is strictly less than `B'` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* the norm of `f'` is strictly less than `B'` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` and `B` have right derivatives `f'` and `B'` respectively at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `‖f' x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b)`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) ha hB hB'
fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le ((bound x hx).trans_lt hr)
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* we have `‖f' x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b)`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the right derivative bounded by `C`
satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
let g x := f x - f a
have hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b) := hf.sub continuousOn_const
have hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x) (Ici x) x := by
intro x hx
simp [g, hf' x hx]
let B x := C * (x - a)
have hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B C x := by
intro x
simpa using (hasDerivAt_const x C).mul ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub (hasDerivAt_const x a))
convert image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary hg hg' _ hB bound
simp only [g, B]; rw [sub_self, norm_zero, sub_self, mul_zero]
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the derivative within `[a, b]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`, `HasDerivWithinAt`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc a b) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment (fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousWithinAt)
(fun x hx => ?_) bound
exact (hf x <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hx).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hx)
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the derivative within `[a, b]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`, `derivWithin`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment {C : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ C) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' ?_ bound
exact fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt
/-- A function on `[0, 1]` with the norm of the derivative within `[0, 1]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C`, `HasDerivWithinAt`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
/-- A function on `[0, 1]` with the norm of the derivative within `[0, 1]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C`, `derivWithin` version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01 {C : ℝ}
(hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖derivWithin f (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
theorem constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero (hcont : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f 0 (Ici x) x) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := by
have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ 0 * (x - a) := fun x hx =>
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment hcont hderiv (fun _ _ => norm_zero.le) x hx
simpa only [zero_mul, norm_le_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero] using this
theorem constant_of_derivWithin_zero (hdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, derivWithin f (Icc a b) x = 0) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := by
have H : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [norm_le_zero_iff] using fun x hx => hderiv x hx
simpa only [zero_mul, norm_le_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero] using fun x hx =>
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment hdiff H x hx
variable {f' g : ℝ → E}
/-- If two continuous functions on `[a, b]` have the same right derivative and are equal at `a`,
then they are equal everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem eq_of_has_deriv_right_eq (derivf : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(derivg : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x) (Ici x) x) (fcont : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(gcont : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b)) (hi : f a = g a) : ∀ y ∈ Icc a b, f y = g y := by
simp only [← @sub_eq_zero _ _ (f _)] at hi ⊢
exact hi ▸ constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero (fcont.sub gcont) fun y hy => by
simpa only [sub_self] using (derivf y hy).sub (derivg y hy)
/-- If two differentiable functions on `[a, b]` have the same derivative within `[a, b]` everywhere
on `[a, b)` and are equal at `a`, then they are equal everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem eq_of_derivWithin_eq (fdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(gdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ g (Icc a b))
(hderiv : EqOn (derivWithin f (Icc a b)) (derivWithin g (Icc a b)) (Ico a b)) (hi : f a = g a) :
∀ y ∈ Icc a b, f y = g y := by
have A : ∀ y ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f (Icc a b) y) (Ici y) y := fun y hy =>
(fdiff y (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)).hasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hy)
have B : ∀ y ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (derivWithin g (Icc a b) y) (Ici y) y := fun y hy =>
(gdiff y (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)).hasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hy)
exact eq_of_has_deriv_right_eq A (fun y hy => (hderiv hy).symm ▸ B y hy) fdiff.continuousOn
gdiff.continuousOn hi
end
/-!
### Vector-valued functions `f : E → G`
Theorems in this section work both for real and complex differentiable functions. We use assumptions
`[NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]` to
achieve this result. For the domain `E` we also assume `[NormedSpace ℝ E]` to have a notion
of a `Convex` set. -/
section
namespace Convex
variable {𝕜 G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{f g : E → G} {C : ℝ} {s : Set E} {x y : E} {f' g' : E → E →L[𝕜] G} {φ : E →L[𝕜] G}
instance (priority := 100) : PathConnectedSpace 𝕜 := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
infer_instance
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`, then
the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `HasFDerivWithinAt`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) : ‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
letI : NormedSpace ℝ G := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 G
/- By composition with `AffineMap.lineMap x y`, we reduce to a statement for functions defined
on `[0,1]`, for which it is proved in `norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment`.
We just have to check the differentiability of the composition and bounds on its derivative,
which is straightforward but tedious for lack of automation. -/
set g := (AffineMap.lineMap x y : ℝ → E)
have segm : MapsTo g (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ) s := hs.mapsTo_lineMap xs ys
have hD : ∀ t ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1,
HasDerivWithinAt (f ∘ g) (f' (g t) (y - x)) (Icc 0 1) t := fun t ht => by
simpa using ((hf (g t) (segm ht)).restrictScalars ℝ).comp_hasDerivWithinAt _
AffineMap.hasDerivWithinAt_lineMap segm
have bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖f' (g t) (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := fun t ht =>
le_of_opNorm_le _ (bound _ <| segm <| Ico_subset_Icc_self ht) _
simpa [g] using norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' hD bound
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C` on
`s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`. Version with `HasFDerivWithinAt` and
`LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖₊ ≤ C)
(hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s := by
rw [lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le]
intro x x_in y y_in
exact hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le hf bound y_in x_in
/-- Let `s` be a convex set in a real normed vector space `E`, let `f : E → G` be a function
differentiable within `s` in a neighborhood of `x : E` with derivative `f'`. Suppose that `f'` is
continuous within `s` at `x`. Then for any number `K : ℝ≥0` larger than `‖f' x‖₊`, `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz on some neighborhood of `x` within `s`. See also
`Convex.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt` for a version that claims
existence of `K` instead of an explicit estimate. -/
theorem exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt (hs : Convex ℝ s)
{f : E → G} (hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y)
(hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f' s x) (K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f' x‖₊ < K) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t := by
obtain ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0,
ball x ε ∩ s ⊆ { y | HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y ∧ ‖f' y‖₊ < K } :=
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 (hder.and <| hcont.nnnorm.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hK))
rw [inter_comm] at hε
refine ⟨s ∩ ball x ε, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ball_mem_nhds _ ε0), ?_⟩
exact
(hs.inter (convex_ball _ _)).lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun y hy => (hε hy).1.mono inter_subset_left) fun y hy => (hε hy).2.le
/-- Let `s` be a convex set in a real normed vector space `E`, let `f : E → G` be a function
differentiable within `s` in a neighborhood of `x : E` with derivative `f'`. Suppose that `f'` is
continuous within `s` at `x`. Then for any number `K : ℝ≥0` larger than `‖f' x‖₊`, `f` is Lipschitz
on some neighborhood of `x` within `s`. See also
`Convex.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt` for a version
with an explicit estimate on the Lipschitz constant. -/
theorem exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt (hs : Convex ℝ s) {f : E → G}
(hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y) (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f' s x) :
∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t :=
(exists_gt _).imp <|
hs.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt hder hcont
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function within this set is
bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `fderivWithin`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C` on
`s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`. Version with `fderivWithin` and
`LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_fderivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖₊ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`,
then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `fderiv`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderiv_le (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt) bound xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C` on
`s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`. Version with `fderiv` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_fderiv_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖₊ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`, then the function is
`C`-Lipschitz. Version with `fderiv` and `LipschitzWith`. -/
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_fderiv_le
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : E → G}
{C : ℝ≥0} (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f)
(bound : ∀ x, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖₊ ≤ C) : LipschitzWith C f := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 E
rw [← lipschitzOnWith_univ]
exact lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_fderiv_le (fun x _ ↦ hf x) (fun x _ ↦ bound x) convex_univ
/-- Variant of the mean value inequality on a convex set, using a bound on the difference between
the derivative and a fixed linear map, rather than a bound on the derivative itself. Version with
`HasFDerivWithinAt`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le'
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x - φ‖ ≤ C)
(hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) : ‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := by
/- We subtract `φ` to define a new function `g` for which `g' = 0`, for which the previous theorem
applies, `Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le`. Then, we just need to glue
together the pieces, expressing back `f` in terms of `g`. -/
let g y := f y - φ y
have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt g (f' x - φ) s x := fun x xs =>
(hf x xs).sub φ.hasFDerivWithinAt
calc
‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ = ‖f y - f x - (φ y - φ x)‖ := by simp
_ = ‖f y - φ y - (f x - φ x)‖ := by congr 1; abel
_ = ‖g y - g x‖ := by simp [g]
_ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le hg bound hs xs ys
/-- Variant of the mean value inequality on a convex set. Version with `fderivWithin`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le' (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x - φ‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le' (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
xs ys
/-- Variant of the mean value inequality on a convex set. Version with `fderiv`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderiv_le' (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x - φ‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le'
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt) bound xs ys
/-- If a function has zero Fréchet derivative at every point of a convex set,
then it is a constant on this set. -/
theorem is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y := by
have bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ ≤ 0 := fun x hx => by
simp only [hf' x hx, norm_zero, le_rfl]
simpa only [(dist_eq_norm _ _).symm, zero_mul, dist_le_zero, eq_comm] using
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le hf bound hx hy
theorem _root_.is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : E → G}
(hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hf' : ∀ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0)
(x y : E) : f x = f y := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 E
exact convex_univ.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero hf.differentiableOn
(fun x _ => by rw [fderivWithin_univ]; exact hf' x) trivial trivial
/-- If two functions have equal Fréchet derivatives at every point of a convex set, and are equal at
one point in that set, then they are equal on that set. -/
theorem eqOn_of_fderivWithin_eq (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) (hs' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s)) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfgx : f x = g x) :
s.EqOn f g := fun y hy => by
suffices f x - g x = f y - g y by rwa [hfgx, sub_self, eq_comm, sub_eq_zero] at this
refine hs.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero (hf.sub hg) (fun z hz => ?_) hx hy
rw [fderivWithin_sub (hs' _ hz) (hf _ hz) (hg _ hz), sub_eq_zero, hf' hz]
/-- If `f` has zero derivative on an open set, then `f` is locally constant on `s`. -/
-- TODO: change the spelling once we have `IsLocallyConstantOn`.
theorem _root_.IsOpen.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) 0) (t : Set G) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
refine Metric.isOpen_iff.mpr fun y ⟨hy, hy'⟩ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := Metric.isOpen_iff.mp hs y hy
refine ⟨r, hr, Set.subset_inter h fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
have := (convex_ball y r).is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero (hf.mono h) ?_ hx (mem_ball_self hr)
· simpa [this]
· intro z hz
simpa only [fderivWithin_of_isOpen Metric.isOpen_ball hz] using hf' (h hz)
theorem _root_.isLocallyConstant_of_fderiv_eq_zero (h₁ : Differentiable 𝕜 f)
(h₂ : ∀ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0) : IsLocallyConstant f := by
simpa using isOpen_univ.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero h₁.differentiableOn fun _ _ ↦ h₂ _
/-- If `f` has zero derivative on a connected open set, then `f` is constant on `s`. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) 0) : ∃ a, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = a := by
obtain (rfl|⟨y, hy⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
· refine ⟨f y, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
have h₁ := hs.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero hf hf' {f y}
have h₂ := hf.continuousOn.comp_continuous continuous_subtype_val (fun x ↦ x.2)
by_contra h₃
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := (isClosed_singleton (x := f y)).preimage h₂
have ht'' : ∀ a ∈ s, a ∈ t ↔ f a ≠ f y := by simpa [Set.ext_iff] using ht'
obtain ⟨z, H₁, H₂, H₃⟩ := hs' _ _ h₁ ht (fun x h ↦ by simp [h, ht'', eq_or_ne]) ⟨y, by simpa⟩
⟨x, by simp [ht'' _ hx, hx, h₃]⟩
exact (ht'' _ H₁).mp H₃ H₂.2
theorem _root_.IsOpen.is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) 0) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' hf hf'
rw [ha x hx, ha y hy]
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_eq_add_of_fderiv_eq (hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) (fderiv 𝕜 g)) : ∃ a, s.EqOn f (g · + a) := by
simp_rw [Set.EqOn, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
refine hs.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' (hf.sub hg) fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [fderiv_sub (hf.differentiableAt (hs.mem_nhds hx)) (hg.differentiableAt (hs.mem_nhds hx)),
hf' hx, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- If two functions have equal Fréchet derivatives at every point of a connected open set,
and are equal at one point in that set, then they are equal on that set. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.eqOn_of_fderiv_eq (hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, fderiv 𝕜 f x = fderiv 𝕜 g x) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfgx : f x = g x) :
s.EqOn f g := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs.exists_eq_add_of_fderiv_eq hs' hf hg hf'
obtain rfl := left_eq_add.mp (hfgx.symm.trans (ha hx))
simpa using ha
theorem _root_.eq_of_fderiv_eq
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f g : E → G}
(hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g)
(hf' : ∀ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x = fderiv 𝕜 g x) (x : E) (hfgx : f x = g x) : f = g := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 E
suffices Set.univ.EqOn f g from funext fun x => this <| mem_univ x
exact convex_univ.eqOn_of_fderivWithin_eq hf.differentiableOn hg.differentiableOn
uniqueDiffOn_univ (fun x _ => by simpa using hf' _) (mem_univ _) hfgx
lemma isLittleO_pow_succ {x₀ : E} {n : ℕ} (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (hf' : f' =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n) :
(fun x ↦ f x - f x₀) =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖ ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hf' ⊢
intro c hc
simp_rw [norm_pow, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, norm_norm]
simp_rw [norm_pow, norm_norm] at hf'
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, segment ℝ x₀ x ⊆ s ∧ ∀ y ∈ segment ℝ x₀ x, ‖f' y‖ ≤ c * ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n := by
have h1 : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, x ∈ s := eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
filter_upwards [h1, hs.eventually_nhdsWithin_segment hx₀s (hf' hc)] with x hxs h
refine ⟨hs.segment_subset hx₀s hxs, fun y hy ↦ (h y hy).trans ?_⟩
gcongr
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_segment hy
filter_upwards [this] with x ⟨h_segment, h⟩
convert (convex_segment x₀ x).norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(f := fun x ↦ f x - f x₀) (y := x) (x := x₀) (s := segment ℝ x₀ x) ?_ h
(left_mem_segment ℝ x₀ x) (right_mem_segment ℝ x₀ x) using 1
· simp
· simp only [hasFDerivWithinAt_sub_const_iff]
exact fun x hx ↦ (hff' x (h_segment hx)).mono h_segment
theorem isLittleO_pow_succ_real {f f' : ℝ → E} {x₀ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {s : Set ℝ}
(hs : Convex ℝ s) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (hf' : f' =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ (x - x₀) ^ n) :
(fun x ↦ f x - f x₀) =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ (x - x₀) ^ (n + 1) := by
have h := hs.isLittleO_pow_succ hx₀s hff' ?_ (n := n)
· rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at h ⊢
simpa using h
· rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hf' ⊢
convert hf' using 4 with c hc x
simp
end Convex
namespace Convex
variable {𝕜 G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{f f' : 𝕜 → G} {s : Set 𝕜} {x y : 𝕜}
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `HasDerivWithinAt`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) : ‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt)
(fun x hx => le_trans (by simp) (bound x hx)) hs xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C` on `s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`.
Version with `HasDerivWithinAt` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasDerivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖₊ ≤ C) :
LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
Convex.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt)
(fun x hx => le_trans (by simp) (bound x hx)) hs
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function within
this set is bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `derivWithin` -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_derivWithin_le {C : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖derivWithin f s x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt) bound xs
ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C` on `s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`.
Version with `derivWithin` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_derivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖derivWithin f s x‖₊ ≤ C) :
LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `deriv`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le {C : ℝ} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt) bound xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C` on `s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`.
Version with `deriv` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖deriv f x‖₊ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`,
then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `deriv` and `LipschitzWith`. -/
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f)
(bound : ∀ x, ‖deriv f x‖₊ ≤ C) : LipschitzWith C f :=
lipschitzOnWith_univ.1 <|
convex_univ.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le (fun x _ => hf x) fun x _ => bound x
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → G`, `𝕜 = R` or `𝕜 = ℂ`, is differentiable everywhere and its derivative equal zero,
then it is a constant function. -/
theorem _root_.is_const_of_deriv_eq_zero (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hf' : ∀ x, deriv f x = 0)
(x y : 𝕜) : f x = f y :=
is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hf (fun z => by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf']) _ _
theorem _root_.IsOpen.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_deriv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) 0) (t : Set G) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hs.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero hf
(fun x hx ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' hx]) t
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_is_const_of_deriv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) 0) : ∃ a, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = a :=
hs.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' hf (fun {x} hx ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' hx])
theorem _root_.IsOpen.is_const_of_deriv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) 0) {x y : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y :=
hs.is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' hf (fun a ha ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' ha]) hx hy
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_eq_add_of_deriv_eq {f g : 𝕜 → G} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hs' : IsPreconnected s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) (deriv g)) : ∃ a, s.EqOn f (g · + a) :=
hs.exists_eq_add_of_fderiv_eq hs' hf hg (fun x hx ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' hx])
theorem _root_.IsOpen.eqOn_of_deriv_eq {f g : 𝕜 → G} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) (deriv g)) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfgx : f x = g x) :
s.EqOn f g :=
hs.eqOn_of_fderiv_eq hs' hf hg (fun _ hx ↦ ContinuousLinearMap.ext_ring (hf' hx)) hx hfgx
end Convex
end
section RCLike
/-!
### Vector-valued functions `f : E → F`. Strict differentiability.
A `C^1` function is strictly differentiable, when the field is `ℝ` or `ℂ`. This follows from the
mean value inequality on balls, which is a particular case of the above results after restricting
the scalars to `ℝ`. Note that it does not make sense to talk of a convex set over `ℂ`, but balls
make sense and are enough. Many formulations of the mean value inequality could be generalized to
balls over `ℝ` or `ℂ`. For now, we only include the ones that we need.
-/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {H : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H] {f : G → H} {f' : G → G →L[𝕜] H} {x : G}
/-- Over the reals or the complexes, a continuously differentiable function is strictly
differentiable. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt
(hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasFDerivAt f (f' y) y) (hcont : ContinuousAt f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' x) x := by
-- turn little-o definition of strict_fderiv into an epsilon-delta statement
rw [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff]
refine fun c hc => Metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball.mpr ?_
-- the correct ε is the modulus of continuity of f'
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.mp (inter_mem hder (hcont <| ball_mem_nhds _ hc)) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
refine ⟨ε, ε0, ?_⟩
-- simplify formulas involving the product E × E
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ h
rw [← ball_prod_same, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq] at h
-- exploit the choice of ε as the modulus of continuity of f'
have hf' : ∀ x' ∈ ball x ε, ‖f' x' - f' x‖ ≤ c := fun x' H' => by
rw [← dist_eq_norm]
exact le_of_lt (hε H').2
-- apply mean value theorem
letI : NormedSpace ℝ G := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 G
refine (convex_ball _ _).norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le' ?_ hf' h.2 h.1
exact fun y hy => (hε hy).1.hasFDerivWithinAt
/-- Over the reals or the complexes, a continuously differentiable function is strictly
differentiable. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_continuousAt {f f' : 𝕜 → G} {x : 𝕜}
(hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasDerivAt f (f' y) y) (hcont : ContinuousAt f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (f' x) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt (hder.mono fun _ hy => hy.hasFDerivAt) <|
(smulRightL 𝕜 𝕜 G 1).continuous.continuousAt.comp hcont
end RCLike
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/MeanValue.lean | 1,013 | 1,017 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
/-!
# The Minkowski functional, normed field version
In this file we define `(egauge 𝕜 s ·)`
to be the Minkowski functional (gauge) of the set `s`
in a topological vector space `E` over a normed field `𝕜`,
as a function `E → ℝ≥0∞`.
It is defined as the infimum of the norms of `c : 𝕜` such that `x ∈ c • s`.
In particular, for `𝕜 = ℝ≥0` this definition gives an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued version of `gauge`
defined in `Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean`.
This definition can be used to generalize the notion of Fréchet derivative
to maps between topological vector spaces without norms.
Currently, we can't reuse results about `egauge` for `gauge`,
because we lack a theory of normed semifields.
-/
open Function Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology Pointwise ENNReal NNReal
section SMul
/-- The Minkowski functional for vector spaces over normed fields.
Given a set `s` in a vector space over a normed field `𝕜`,
`egauge s` is the functional which sends `x : E`
to the infimum of `‖c‖ₑ` over `c` such that `x` belongs to `s` scaled by `c`.
The definition only requires `𝕜` to have a `ENorm` instance
and `(· • ·) : 𝕜 → E → E` to be defined.
This way the definition applies, e.g., to `𝕜 = ℝ≥0`.
For `𝕜 = ℝ≥0`, the function is equal (up to conversion to `ℝ`)
to the usual Minkowski functional defined in `gauge`. -/
noncomputable def egauge (𝕜 : Type*) [ENorm 𝕜] {E : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E] (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (c : 𝕜) (_ : x ∈ c • s), ‖c‖ₑ
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NNNorm 𝕜] {E : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E] {c : 𝕜} {s t : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
lemma Set.MapsTo.egauge_le {E' F : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E'] [FunLike F E E'] [MulActionHomClass F 𝕜 E E']
(f : F) {t : Set E'} (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 t (f x) ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x :=
iInf_mono fun c ↦ iInf_mono' fun hc ↦ ⟨h.smul_set c hc, le_rfl⟩
@[mono, gcongr]
lemma egauge_anti (h : s ⊆ t) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 t x ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x :=
MapsTo.egauge_le _ (MulActionHom.id ..) h _
@[simp] lemma egauge_empty (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 ∅ x = ∞ := by simp [egauge]
variable {𝕜}
lemma egauge_le_of_mem_smul (h : x ∈ c • s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ ‖c‖ₑ := iInf₂_le c h
lemma le_egauge_iff : r ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x ↔ ∀ c : 𝕜, x ∈ c • s → r ≤ ‖c‖ₑ := le_iInf₂_iff
lemma egauge_eq_top : egauge 𝕜 s x = ∞ ↔ ∀ c : 𝕜, x ∉ c • s := by simp [egauge]
lemma egauge_lt_iff : egauge 𝕜 s x < r ↔ ∃ c : 𝕜, x ∈ c • s ∧ ‖c‖ₑ < r := by
simp [egauge, iInf_lt_iff]
lemma egauge_union (s t : Set E) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 (s ∪ t) x = egauge 𝕜 s x ⊓ egauge 𝕜 t x := by
unfold egauge
simp [smul_set_union, iInf_or, iInf_inf_eq]
lemma le_egauge_inter (s t : Set E) (x : E) :
egauge 𝕜 s x ⊔ egauge 𝕜 t x ≤ egauge 𝕜 (s ∩ t) x :=
max_le (egauge_anti _ inter_subset_left _) (egauge_anti _ inter_subset_right _)
lemma le_egauge_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)] {I : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ I) (s : ∀ i, Set (E i)) (x : ∀ i, E i) :
egauge 𝕜 (s i) (x i) ≤ egauge 𝕜 (I.pi s) x :=
MapsTo.egauge_le _ (Pi.evalMulActionHom i) (fun x hx ↦ by exact hx i hi) _
variable {F : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 F]
lemma le_egauge_prod (s : Set E) (t : Set F) (a : E) (b : F) :
max (egauge 𝕜 s a) (egauge 𝕜 t b) ≤ egauge 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) (a, b) :=
max_le (mapsTo_fst_prod.egauge_le 𝕜 (MulActionHom.fst 𝕜 E F) (a, b))
(MapsTo.egauge_le 𝕜 (MulActionHom.snd 𝕜 E F) mapsTo_snd_prod (a, b))
end SMul
section SMulZero
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NNNorm 𝕜] [Nonempty 𝕜] {E : Type*} [Zero E] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E] {x : E}
@[simp] lemma egauge_zero_left_eq_top : egauge 𝕜 0 x = ∞ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simp [egauge_eq_top]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, egauge_zero_left⟩ := egauge_zero_left_eq_top
end SMulZero
section NormedDivisionRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
{c : 𝕜} {s : Set E} {x : E}
/-- If `c • x ∈ s` and `c ≠ 0`, then `egauge 𝕜 s x` is at most `(‖c‖₊⁻¹ : ℝ≥0)`.
See also `egauge_le_of_smul_mem`. -/
lemma egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne (h : c • x ∈ s) (hc : c ≠ 0) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ (‖c‖₊⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) := by
rw [← nnnorm_inv]
exact egauge_le_of_mem_smul <| (mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ hc _ _).2 h
/-- If `c • x ∈ s`, then `egauge 𝕜 s x` is at most `‖c‖ₑ⁻¹`.
See also `egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne`. -/
lemma egauge_le_of_smul_mem (h : c • x ∈ s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ ‖c‖ₑ⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with rfl | hc
| · simp
· exact (egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne h hc).trans ENNReal.coe_inv_le
lemma mem_smul_of_egauge_lt (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (hc : egauge 𝕜 s x < ‖c‖ₑ) : x ∈ c • s :=
let ⟨a, hxa, ha⟩ := egauge_lt_iff.1 hc
hs.smul_mono (by simpa [enorm] using ha.le) hxa
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/EGauge.lean | 119 | 125 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
|
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 208 | 211 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≤ a} = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ico a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioc a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ico a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ioc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Icc a b) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
end PartialOrder
section Prod
variable {β : Type*}
section sectL
lemma uIcc_map_sectL [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = uIcc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectL : (Icc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Icc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectL : (Ioc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectL : (Ico a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ico (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectL : (Ioo a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioo (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
| end sectL
section sectR
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 691 | 693 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,080 | 1,083 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Two
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Induction
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Periodic
/-!
# Euler's totient function
This file defines [Euler's totient function](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_totient_function)
`Nat.totient n` which counts the number of naturals less than `n` that are coprime with `n`.
We prove the divisor sum formula, namely that `n` equals `φ` summed over the divisors of `n`. See
`sum_totient`. We also prove two lemmas to help compute totients, namely `totient_mul` and
`totient_prime_pow`.
-/
assert_not_exists Algebra LinearMap
open Finset
namespace Nat
/-- Euler's totient function. This counts the number of naturals strictly less than `n` which are
coprime with `n`. -/
def totient (n : ℕ) : ℕ := #{a ∈ range n | n.Coprime a}
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "φ" => Nat.totient
@[simp]
theorem totient_zero : φ 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem totient_one : φ 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem totient_eq_card_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = #{a ∈ range n | n.Coprime a} := rfl
/-- A characterisation of `Nat.totient` that avoids `Finset`. -/
theorem totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = Nat.card { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } := by
let e : { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } ≃ {x ∈ range n | n.Coprime x} :=
{ toFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
invFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
left_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta] }
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, card_congr e, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
theorem totient_le (n : ℕ) : φ n ≤ n :=
((range n).card_filter_le _).trans_eq (card_range n)
theorem totient_lt (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 < n) : φ n < n :=
(card_lt_card (filter_ssubset.2 ⟨0, by simp [hn.ne', pos_of_gt hn]⟩)).trans_eq (card_range n)
@[simp]
theorem totient_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ}, φ n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => by decide
| n + 1 =>
suffices ∃ x < n + 1, (n + 1).gcd x = 1 by simpa [totient, filter_eq_empty_iff]
⟨1 % (n + 1), mod_lt _ n.succ_pos, by rw [gcd_comm, ← gcd_rec, gcd_one_right]⟩
@[simp] theorem totient_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < φ n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
instance neZero_totient {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : NeZero n.totient :=
⟨(totient_pos.mpr <| NeZero.pos n).ne'⟩
theorem filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient (a n : ℕ) :
#{x ∈ Ico n (n + a) | a.Coprime x} = totient a := by
rw [totient, filter_Ico_card_eq_of_periodic, count_eq_card_filter_range]
exact periodic_coprime a
theorem Ico_filter_coprime_le {a : ℕ} (k n : ℕ) (a_pos : 0 < a) :
#{x ∈ Ico k (k + n) | a.Coprime x} ≤ totient a * (n / a + 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n a]
induction' n / a with i ih
· rw [← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a k]
simp only [add_zero, mul_one, mul_zero, le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos), zero_add]
gcongr
exact le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos)
simp only [mul_succ]
simp_rw [← add_assoc] at ih ⊢
calc
#{x ∈ Ico k (k + n % a + a * i + a) | a.Coprime x}
≤ #{x ∈ Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) ∪
Ico (k + n % a + a * i) (k + n % a + a * i + a) | a.Coprime x} := by
gcongr
apply Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
_ ≤ #{x ∈ Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) | a.Coprime x} + a.totient := by
rw [filter_union, ← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a (k + n % a + a * i)]
apply card_union_le
_ ≤ a.totient * i + a.totient + a.totient := add_le_add_right ih (totient a)
open ZMod
/-- Note this takes an explicit `Fintype ((ZMod n)ˣ)` argument to avoid trouble with instance
diamonds. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ZMod.card_units_eq_totient (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] [Fintype (ZMod n)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = φ n :=
calc
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = Fintype.card { x : ZMod n // x.val.Coprime n } :=
Fintype.card_congr ZMod.unitsEquivCoprime
_ = φ n := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero NeZero.out
simp only [totient, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, Fintype.card_subtype, Finset.sum_filter, ←
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range, @Nat.coprime_comm (m + 1)]
rfl
theorem totient_even {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) : Even n.totient := by
haveI : Fact (1 < n) := ⟨one_lt_two.trans hn⟩
haveI : NeZero n := NeZero.of_gt hn
suffices 2 = orderOf (-1 : (ZMod n)ˣ) by
rw [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, even_iff_two_dvd, this]
exact orderOf_dvd_card
rw [← orderOf_units, Units.coe_neg_one, orderOf_neg_one, ringChar.eq (ZMod n) n, if_neg hn.ne']
theorem totient_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : φ (m * n) = φ m * φ n :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases Nat.mul_eq_zero.1 hmn0 with h | h <;>
simp only [totient_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, h]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
simp only [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient]
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Units.mapEquiv (ZMod.chineseRemainder h).toMulEquiv).toEquiv,
Fintype.card_congr (@MulEquiv.prodUnits (ZMod m) (ZMod n) _ _).toEquiv, Fintype.card_prod]
/-- For `d ∣ n`, the totient of `n/d` equals the number of values `k < n` such that `gcd n k = d` -/
theorem totient_div_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (hnd : d ∣ n) :
φ (n / d) = #{k ∈ range n | n.gcd k = d} := by
rcases d.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hd0); · simp [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd hnd]
rcases hnd with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left x hd0]
apply Finset.card_bij fun k _ => d * k
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, and_imp, Coprime]
refine fun a ha1 ha2 => ⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).2 ha1, ?_⟩
rw [gcd_mul_left, ha2, mul_one]
· simp [hd0.ne']
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, exists_prop, and_imp]
refine fun b hb1 hb2 => ?_
have : d ∣ b := by
rw [← hb2]
apply gcd_dvd_right
rcases this with ⟨q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨q, ⟨⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).1 hb1, ?_⟩, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [gcd_mul_left, mul_right_eq_self_iff hd0] at hb2
theorem sum_totient (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sum φ = n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [← sum_div_divisors n φ]
have : n = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, #{k ∈ range n | n.gcd k = d} := by
nth_rw 1 [← card_range n]
refine card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun x _ => mem_divisors.2 ⟨?_, hn.ne'⟩
apply gcd_dvd_left
nth_rw 3 [this]
exact sum_congr rfl fun x hx => totient_div_of_dvd (dvd_of_mem_divisors hx)
theorem sum_totient' (n : ℕ) : ∑ m ∈ range n.succ with m ∣ n, φ m = n := by
convert sum_totient _ using 1
simp only [Nat.divisors, sum_filter, range_eq_Ico]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot] <;> simp
|
/-- When `p` is prime, then the totient of `p ^ (n + 1)` is `p ^ n * (p - 1)` -/
theorem totient_prime_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) : φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = p ^ n * (p - 1) :=
calc
φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = #{a ∈ range (p ^ (n + 1)) | (p ^ (n + 1)).Coprime a} :=
totient_eq_card_coprime _
_ = #(range (p ^ (n + 1)) \ (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p)) :=
congr_arg card
(by
rw [sdiff_eq_filter]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Totient.lean | 168 | 177 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# Affine independence
This file defines affinely independent families of points.
## Main definitions
* `AffineIndependent` defines affinely independent families of points
as those where no nontrivial weighted subtraction is `0`. This is
proved equivalent to two other formulations: linear independence of
the results of subtracting a base point in the family from the other
points in the family, or any equal affine combinations having the
same weights. A bundled type `Simplex` is provided for finite
affinely independent families of points, with an abbreviation
`Triangle` for the case of three points.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
open scoped Affine
section AffineIndependent
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An indexed family is said to be affinely independent if no
nontrivial weighted subtractions (where the sum of weights is 0) are
0. -/
def AffineIndependent (p : ι → P) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0
/-- The definition of `AffineIndependent`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_def (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A family with at most one point is affinely independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → P) : AffineIndependent k p :=
fun _ _ h _ i hi => Fintype.eq_of_subsingleton_of_sum_eq h i hi
/-- A family indexed by a `Fintype` is affinely independent if and
only if no nontrivial weighted subtractions over `Finset.univ` (where
the sum of the weights is 0) are 0. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 0 → Finset.univ.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i, w i = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h w hw hs i => h Finset.univ w hw hs i (Finset.mem_univ _)
· intro h s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hs
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hw
replace h := h ((↑s : Set ι).indicator w) hw hs i
simpa [hi] using h
@[simp] lemma affineIndependent_vadd {p : ι → P} {v : V} :
AffineIndependent k (v +ᵥ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
simp +contextual [AffineIndependent, weightedVSub_vadd]
protected alias ⟨AffineIndependent.of_vadd, AffineIndependent.vadd⟩ := affineIndependent_vadd
@[simp] lemma affineIndependent_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V]
[SMulCommClass G k V] {p : ι → V} {a : G} :
AffineIndependent k (a • p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
simp +contextual [AffineIndependent, weightedVSub_smul,
← smul_comm (α := V) a, ← smul_sum, smul_eq_zero_iff_eq]
protected alias ⟨AffineIndependent.of_smul, AffineIndependent.smul⟩ := affineIndependent_smul
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if the differences
from a base point in that family are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub (p : ι → P) (i1 : ι) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ LinearIndependent k fun i : { x // x ≠ i1 } => (p i -ᵥ p i1 : V) := by
classical
constructor
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
set f : ι → k := fun x => if hx : x = i1 then -∑ y ∈ s, g y else g ⟨x, hx⟩ with hfdef
let s2 : Finset ι := insert i1 (s.map (Embedding.subtype _))
have hfg : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, g x = f x := by
intro x
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg x.property, Subtype.coe_eta]
rw [hfg]
have hf : ∑ ι ∈ s2, f ι = 0 := by
rw [Finset.sum_insert
(Finset.not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property s (Classical.not_not.2 rfl)),
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => (hfg x).symm]
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos rfl]
exact neg_add_cancel _
have hs2 : s2.weightedVSub p f = (0 : V) := by
set f2 : ι → V := fun x => f x • (p x -ᵥ p i1) with hf2def
set g2 : { x // x ≠ i1 } → V := fun x => g x • (p x -ᵥ p i1)
have hf2g2 : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, f2 x = g2 x := by
simp only [g2, hf2def]
refine fun x => ?_
rw [hfg]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s2 f p hf (p i1),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => hf2g2 x]
exact hg
exact h s2 f hf hs2 i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_map.2 ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at h
intro s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p hw (p i1), ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase w p i1, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply] at hs
let f : ι → V := fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i1)
have hs2 : (∑ i ∈ (s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1, f i) = 0 := by
rw [← hs]
convert Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem f fun x => Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
have h2 := h ((s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1) (fun x => w x) hs2
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype] at h2
have h2b : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ i1 → w i = 0 := fun i his hi =>
h2 ⟨i, hi⟩ (Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hi his)
exact Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw h2b i hi
/-- A set is affinely independent if and only if the differences from
a base point in that set are linearly independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub {s : Set P} {p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P) ↔
LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → V) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (fun p => p : s → P) ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩]
constructor
· intro h
have hv : ∀ v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}), (v : V) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ s \ {p₁} := fun v =>
(vsub_left_injective p₁).mem_set_image.1 ((vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm ▸ v.property)
let f : (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } := fun x =>
⟨⟨(x : V) +ᵥ p₁, Set.mem_of_mem_diff (hv x)⟩, fun hx =>
Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff (hv x) (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (vadd_right_cancel p₁ (Subtype.ext_iff.1 (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
ext v
exact (vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm
· intro h
let f : { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } → (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) := fun x =>
⟨((x : s) : P) -ᵥ p₁, ⟨x, ⟨⟨(x : s).property, fun hx => x.property (Subtype.ext hx)⟩, rfl⟩⟩⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (vsub_left_cancel (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
/-- A set of nonzero vectors is linearly independent if and only if,
given a point `p₁`, the vectors added to `p₁` and `p₁` itself are
affinely independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton {s : Set V}
(hs : ∀ v ∈ s, v ≠ (0 : V)) (p₁ : P) : LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : s → V) ↔
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : ({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s : Set P) → P) := by
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k
(Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton p₁))]
have h : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s) \ {p₁}) = s := by
simp_rw [Set.union_diff_left, Set.image_diff (vsub_left_injective p₁), Set.image_image,
Set.image_singleton, vsub_self, vadd_vsub, Set.image_id']
exact Set.diff_singleton_eq_self fun h => hs 0 h rfl
rw [h]
/-- A family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point
have equal `Set.indicator`. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s1 s2 : Finset ι) (w1 w2 : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s1, w1 i = 1 →
∑ i ∈ s2, w2 i = 1 →
s1.affineCombination k p w1 = s2.affineCombination k p w2 →
Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 = Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 := by
classical
constructor
· intro ha s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 heq
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s1 ∪ s2
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w1 (s1.subset_union_left (s₂ := s2))] at hw1
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w2 (s1.subset_union_right)] at hw2
have hws : (∑ i ∈ s1 ∪ s2, (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) i) = 0 := by
simp [hw1, hw2]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (s1.subset_union_left (s₂ := s2)),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p s1.subset_union_right,
← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, Finset.affineCombination_vsub] at heq
exact ha (s1 ∪ s2) (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) hws heq i hi
· rw [← Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_union] at hi
have h₁ : Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_left _ i ↑s1 ↑s2) hi) h
have h₂ : Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_right _ i ↑s2 ↑s1) hi) h
simp [h₁, h₂]
· intro ha s w hw hs i0 hi0
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi0]
simp only [Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, const_apply]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i0 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi0 (Function.update_self ..)
fun _ _ hne => Function.update_of_ne hne ..
let w2 := w + w1
have hw2 : ∑ i ∈ s, w2 i = 1 := by
simp_all only [w2, Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, zero_add]
have hw2s : s.affineCombination k p w2 = p i0 := by
simp_all only [w2, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, zero_vadd]
replace ha := ha s s w2 w1 hw2 hw1 (hw1s.symm ▸ hw2s)
have hws : w2 i0 - w1 i0 = 0 := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe] at hi0
rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w2, ← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w1, ha, sub_self]
simpa [w2] using hws
/-- A finite family is affinely independent if and only if any affine
combinations (with sum of weights 1) that evaluate to the same point are equal. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ ∀ w1 w2 : ι → k, ∑ i, w1 i = 1 → ∑ i, w2 i = 1 →
Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w2 → w1 = w2 := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq]
constructor
· intro h w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
simpa only [Set.indicator_univ, Finset.coe_univ] using h _ _ w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
· intro h s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
have hw1' : (∑ i, (s1 : Set ι).indicator w1 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s1)]
have hw2' : (∑ i, (s2 : Set ι).indicator w2 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s2)]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (Finset.subset_univ s1),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p (Finset.subset_univ s2)] at hweq
exact h _ _ hw1' hw2' hweq
variable {k}
/-- If we single out one member of an affine-independent family of points and affinely transport
all others along the line joining them to this member, the resulting new family of points is affine-
independent.
This is the affine version of `LinearIndependent.units_smul`. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.units_lineMap {p : ι → P} (hp : AffineIndependent k p) (j : ι)
(w : ι → Units k) : AffineIndependent k fun i => AffineMap.lineMap (p j) (p i) (w i : k) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k _ j] at hp ⊢
simp only [AffineMap.lineMap_vsub_left, AffineMap.coe_const, AffineMap.lineMap_same, const_apply]
exact hp.units_smul fun i => w i
theorem AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 1) (h : s₁.affineCombination k p w₁ = s₂.affineCombination k p w₂) :
Set.indicator (↑s₁) w₁ = Set.indicator (↑s₂) w₂ :=
(affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq k p).1 ha s₁ s₂ w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂ h
/-- An affinely independent family is injective, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.injective [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : Function.Injective p := by
intro i j hij
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub _ _ j] at ha
by_contra hij'
refine ha.ne_zero ⟨i, hij'⟩ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.mpr ?_)
simp_all only [ne_eq]
/-- If a family is affinely independent, so is any subfamily given by
composition of an embedding into index type with the original
family. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.comp_embedding {ι2 : Type*} (f : ι2 ↪ ι) {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : AffineIndependent k (p ∘ f) := by
classical
intro fs w hw hs i0 hi0
let fs' := fs.map f
let w' i := if h : ∃ i2, f i2 = i then w h.choose else 0
have hw' : ∀ i2 : ι2, w' (f i2) = w i2 := by
intro i2
have h : ∃ i : ι2, f i = f i2 := ⟨i2, rfl⟩
have hs : h.choose = i2 := f.injective h.choose_spec
simp_rw [w', dif_pos h, hs]
have hw's : ∑ i ∈ fs', w' i = 0 := by
rw [← hw, Finset.sum_map]
simp [hw']
have hs' : fs'.weightedVSub p w' = (0 : V) := by
rw [← hs, Finset.weightedVSub_map]
congr with i
simp_all only [comp_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, exists_eq, dite_true]
rw [← ha fs' w' hw's hs' (f i0) ((Finset.mem_map' _).2 hi0), hw']
/-- If a family is affinely independent, so is any subfamily indexed
by a subtype of the index type. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.subtype {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s : Set ι) :
AffineIndependent k fun i : s => p i :=
ha.comp_embedding (Embedding.subtype _)
/-- If an indexed family of points is affinely independent, so is the
corresponding set of points. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.range {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P) := by
let f : Set.range p → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let fe : Set.range p ↪ ι := ⟨f, fun x₁ x₂ he => Subtype.ext (hf x₁ ▸ hf x₂ ▸ he ▸ rfl)⟩
convert ha.comp_embedding fe
ext
simp [fe, hf]
theorem affineIndependent_equiv {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') {p : ι' → P} :
AffineIndependent k (p ∘ e) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
refine ⟨?_, AffineIndependent.comp_embedding e.toEmbedding⟩
intro h
have : p = p ∘ e ∘ e.symm.toEmbedding := by
ext
simp
rw [this]
exact h.comp_embedding e.symm.toEmbedding
/-- If a set of points is affinely independent, so is any subset. -/
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mono {s t : Set P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : t → P)) (hs : s ⊆ t) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : s → P) :=
ha.comp_embedding (s.embeddingOfSubset t hs)
/-- If the range of an injective indexed family of points is affinely
independent, so is that family. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.of_set_of_injective {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P)) (hi : Function.Injective p) :
AffineIndependent k p :=
ha.comp_embedding
(⟨fun i => ⟨p i, Set.mem_range_self _⟩, fun _ _ h => hi (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 h)⟩ :
ι ↪ Set.range p)
section Composition
variable {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
/-- If the image of a family of points in affine space under an affine transformation is affine-
independent, then the original family of points is also affine-independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.of_comp {p : ι → P} (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) (hai : AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p)) :
AffineIndependent k p := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h | h
· haveI := h
apply affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
obtain ⟨i⟩ := h
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p i]
simp_rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (f ∘ p) i, Function.comp_apply, ←
f.linearMap_vsub] at hai
exact LinearIndependent.of_comp f.linear hai
/-- The image of a family of points in affine space, under an injective affine transformation, is
affine-independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.map' {p : ι → P} (hai : AffineIndependent k p) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h | h
· haveI := h
apply affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
obtain ⟨i⟩ := h
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k p i] at hai
simp_rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (f ∘ p) i, Function.comp_apply, ←
f.linearMap_vsub]
have hf' : LinearMap.ker f.linear = ⊥ := by rwa [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, f.linear_injective_iff]
exact LinearIndependent.map' hai f.linear hf'
/-- Injective affine maps preserve affine independence. -/
theorem AffineMap.affineIndependent_iff {p : ι → P} (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
AffineIndependent k (f ∘ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p :=
⟨AffineIndependent.of_comp f, fun hai => AffineIndependent.map' hai f hf⟩
/-- Affine equivalences preserve affine independence of families of points. -/
theorem AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_iff {p : ι → P} (e : P ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
AffineIndependent k (e ∘ p) ↔ AffineIndependent k p :=
e.toAffineMap.affineIndependent_iff e.toEquiv.injective
/-- Affine equivalences preserve affine independence of subsets. -/
theorem AffineEquiv.affineIndependent_set_of_eq_iff {s : Set P} (e : P ≃ᵃ[k] P₂) :
AffineIndependent k ((↑) : e '' s → P₂) ↔ AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → P) := by
have : e ∘ ((↑) : s → P) = ((↑) : e '' s → P₂) ∘ (e : P ≃ P₂).image s := rfl
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [← e.affineIndependent_iff, this, affineIndependent_equiv]
end Composition
/-- If a family is affinely independent, and the spans of points
indexed by two subsets of the index type have a point in common, those
subsets of the index type have an element in common, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} {p0 : P} (hp0s1 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s1))
(hp0s2 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s2)) : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ s1 ∩ s2 := by
rw [Set.image_eq_range] at hp0s1 hp0s2
rw [mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination, ←
Finset.eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype] at hp0s1 hp0s2
rcases hp0s1 with ⟨fs1, hfs1, w1, hw1, hp0s1⟩
rcases hp0s2 with ⟨fs2, hfs2, w2, hw2, hp0s2⟩
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq] at ha
replace ha := ha fs1 fs2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 (hp0s1 ▸ hp0s2)
have hnz : ∑ i ∈ fs1, w1 i ≠ 0 := hw1.symm ▸ one_ne_zero
rcases Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hnz with ⟨i, hifs1, hinz⟩
simp_rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem (Finset.mem_coe.2 hifs1) w1, ha] at hinz
use i, hfs1 hifs1
exact hfs2 (Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero hinz)
/-- If a family is affinely independent, the spans of points indexed
by disjoint subsets of the index type are disjoint, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.affineSpan_disjoint_of_disjoint [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} (hd : Disjoint s1 s2) :
Disjoint (affineSpan k (p '' s1) : Set P) (affineSpan k (p '' s2)) := by
refine Set.disjoint_left.2 fun p0 hp0s1 hp0s2 => ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := ha.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan hp0s1 hp0s2
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 hd hi
/-- If a family is affinely independent, a point in the family is in
the span of some of the points given by a subset of the index type if
and only if that point's index is in the subset, if the underlying
ring is nontrivial. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mem_affineSpan_iff [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (i : ι) (s : Set ι) : p i ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s) ↔ i ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs
have h :=
AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan ha hs
(mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _)))
rwa [← Set.nonempty_def, Set.inter_singleton_nonempty] at h
· exact fun h => mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p h)
/-- If a family is affinely independent, a point in the family is not
in the affine span of the other points, if the underlying ring is
nontrivial. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.not_mem_affineSpan_diff [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (i : ι) (s : Set ι) : p i ∉ affineSpan k (p '' (s \ {i})) := by
simp [ha]
theorem exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind {t : Finset V}
(h : ¬AffineIndependent k ((↑) : t → V)) :
∃ f : V → k, ∑ e ∈ t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∑ e ∈ t, f e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, f x ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype] at h
simp only [exists_prop, not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨w, hw, hwt, i, hi⟩ := h
simp only [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ w ((↑) : t → V) hw 0,
vsub_eq_sub, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sub_zero] at hwt
let f : ∀ x : V, x ∈ t → k := fun x hx => w ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨fun x => if hx : x ∈ t then f x hx else (0 : k), ?_, ?_, by use i; simp [f, hi]⟩
on_goal 1 =>
suffices (∑ e ∈ t, dite (e ∈ t) (fun hx => f e hx • e) fun _ => 0) = 0 by
convert this
rename V => x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [hx]
all_goals
simp only [f, Finset.sum_dite_of_true fun _ h => h, Finset.mk_coe, hwt, hw]
variable {s : Finset ι} {w w₁ w₂ : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, we can characterise affine independence
in terms of linear combinations. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff {ι} {p : ι → V} :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), s.sum w = 0 → ∑ e ∈ s, w e • p e = 0 → ∀ e ∈ s, w e = 0 :=
forall₃_congr fun s w hw => by simp [s.weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination hw]
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero (hp : AffineIndependent k p)
(hw₀ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i = 0) : ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
affineIndependent_iff.1 hp _ _ hw₀ hw₁
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_of_sum_eq_sum (hp : AffineIndependent k p)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i) (hwp : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i • p i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i • p i) :
∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i := by
refine fun i hi ↦ sub_eq_zero.1 (hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero (w := w₁ - w₂) ?_ ?_ _ hi) <;>
simpa [sub_mul, sub_smul, sub_eq_zero]
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype {s : Finset V}
(hp : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) {w : V → k} (hw₀ : ∑ x ∈ s, w x = 0)
(hw₁ : ∑ x ∈ s, w x • x = 0) : ∀ x ∈ s, w x = 0 := by
rw [← sum_attach] at hw₀ hw₁
exact fun x hx ↦ hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw₀ hw₁ ⟨x, hx⟩ (mem_univ _)
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_of_sum_eq_sum_subtype {s : Finset V}
(hp : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) {w₁ w₂ : V → k} (hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i)
(hwp : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i • i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i • i) : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i := by
refine fun i hi => sub_eq_zero.1 (hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype (w := w₁ - w₂) ?_ ?_ _ hi) <;>
simpa [sub_mul, sub_smul, sub_eq_zero]
/-- Given an affinely independent family of points, a weighted subtraction lies in the
`vectorSpan` of two points given as affine combinations if and only if it is a weighted
subtraction with weights a multiple of the difference between the weights of the two points. -/
theorem weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p) {w w₁ w₂ : ι → k}
{s : Finset ι} (hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) :
s.weightedVSub p w ∈
vectorSpan k ({s.affineCombination k p w₁, s.affineCombination k p w₂} : Set P) ↔
∃ r : k, ∀ i ∈ s, w i = r * (w₁ i - w₂ i) := by
rw [mem_vectorSpan_pair]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
refine ⟨r, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [s.affineCombination_vsub, ← s.weightedVSub_const_smul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub] at hr
have hw' : (∑ j ∈ s, (r • (w₁ - w₂) - w) j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.sub_apply, smul_sub, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ←
Finset.smul_sum, hw, hw₁, hw₂, sub_self]
have hr' := h s _ hw' hr i hi
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← smul_eq_mul]
exact hr'
· rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
refine ⟨r, ?_⟩
let w' i := r * (w₁ i - w₂ i)
change ∀ i ∈ s, w i = w' i at hr
rw [s.weightedVSub_congr hr fun _ _ => rfl, s.affineCombination_vsub, ←
s.weightedVSub_const_smul]
congr
/-- Given an affinely independent family of points, an affine combination lies in the
span of two points given as affine combinations if and only if it is an affine combination
with weights those of one point plus a multiple of the difference between the weights of the
two points. -/
theorem affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p)
{w w₁ w₂ : ι → k} {s : Finset ι} (_ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k p w ∈ line[k, s.affineCombination k p w₁, s.affineCombination k p w₂] ↔
∃ r : k, ∀ i ∈ s, w i = r * (w₂ i - w₁ i) + w₁ i := by
rw [← vsub_vadd (s.affineCombination k p w) (s.affineCombination k p w₁),
AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _),
direction_affineSpan, s.affineCombination_vsub, Set.pair_comm,
weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair h _ hw₂ hw₁]
· simp only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
· simp_all only [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, sub_self]
end AffineIndependent
section DivisionRing
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
/-- An affinely independent set of points can be extended to such a
set that spans the whole space. -/
theorem exists_subset_affineIndependent_affineSpan_eq_top {s : Set P}
(h : AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P)) :
∃ t : Set P, s ⊆ t ∧ AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : t → P) ∧ affineSpan k t = ⊤ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩)
· have p₁ : P := AddTorsor.nonempty.some
let hsv := Basis.ofVectorSpace k V
have hsvi := hsv.linearIndependent
have hsvt := hsv.span_eq
rw [Basis.coe_ofVectorSpace] at hsvi hsvt
have h0 : ∀ v : V, v ∈ Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex k V → v ≠ 0 := by
intro v hv
simpa [hsv] using hsv.ne_zero ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton k h0 p₁] at hsvi
exact
⟨{p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' _, Set.empty_subset _, hsvi,
affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top p₁ hsvt⟩
· rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k hp₁] at h
let bsv := Basis.extend h
have hsvi := bsv.linearIndependent
have hsvt := bsv.span_eq
rw [Basis.coe_extend] at hsvi hsvt
rw [linearIndependent_subtype_iff] at hsvi h
have hsv := h.subset_extend (Set.subset_univ _)
have h0 : ∀ v : V, v ∈ h.extend (Set.subset_univ _) → v ≠ 0 := by
intro v hv
simpa [bsv] using bsv.ne_zero ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [← linearIndependent_subtype_iff,
linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton k h0 p₁] at hsvi
refine ⟨{p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' h.extend (Set.subset_univ _), ?_, ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ?_ (Set.union_subset_union_right _ (Set.image_subset _ hsv))
simp [Set.image_image]
· use hsvi
exact affineSpan_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top p₁ hsvt
variable (k V)
theorem exists_affineIndependent (s : Set P) :
∃ t ⊆ s, affineSpan k t = affineSpan k s ∧ AffineIndependent k ((↑) : t → P) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨p, hp⟩)
· exact ⟨∅, Set.empty_subset ∅, rfl, affineIndependent_of_subsingleton k _⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂, hb₃⟩ := exists_linearIndependent k ((Equiv.vaddConst p).symm '' s)
have hb₀ : ∀ v : V, v ∈ b → v ≠ 0 := fun v hv => hb₃.ne_zero (⟨v, hv⟩ : b)
rw [linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton k hb₀ p] at hb₃
refine ⟨{p} ∪ Equiv.vaddConst p '' b, ?_, ?_, hb₃⟩
· apply Set.union_subset (Set.singleton_subset_iff.mpr hp)
rwa [← (Equiv.vaddConst p).subset_symm_image b s]
· rw [Equiv.coe_vaddConst_symm, ← vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k hp] at hb₂
apply AffineSubspace.ext_of_direction_eq
· have : Submodule.span k b = Submodule.span k (insert 0 b) := by simp
simp only [direction_affineSpan, ← hb₂, Equiv.coe_vaddConst, Set.singleton_union,
vectorSpan_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (Set.mem_insert p _), this]
congr
change (Equiv.vaddConst p).symm '' insert p (Equiv.vaddConst p '' b) = _
rw [Set.image_insert_eq, ← Set.image_comp]
simp
· use p
simp only [Equiv.coe_vaddConst, Set.singleton_union, Set.mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_insert p _), mem_affineSpan k hp⟩
variable {V}
/-- Two different points are affinely independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_ne {p₁ p₂ : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) : AffineIndependent k ![p₁, p₂] := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k ![p₁, p₂] 0]
let i₁ : { x // x ≠ (0 : Fin 2) } := ⟨1, by norm_num⟩
have he' : ∀ i, i = i₁ := by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
ext
fin_cases i
· simp at hi
· simp [i₁]
haveI : Unique { x // x ≠ (0 : Fin 2) } := ⟨⟨i₁⟩, he'⟩
apply linearIndependent_unique
rw [he' default]
simpa using h.symm
variable {k}
/-- If all but one point of a family are affinely independent, and that point does not lie in
the affine span of that family, the family is affinely independent. -/
theorem AffineIndependent.affineIndependent_of_not_mem_span {p : ι → P} {i : ι}
(ha : AffineIndependent k fun x : { y // y ≠ i } => p x)
(hi : p i ∉ affineSpan k (p '' { x | x ≠ i })) : AffineIndependent k p := by
classical
intro s w hw hs
let s' : Finset { y // y ≠ i } := s.subtype (· ≠ i)
let p' : { y // y ≠ i } → P := fun x => p x
by_cases his : i ∈ s ∧ w i ≠ 0
· refine False.elim (hi ?_)
let wm : ι → k := -(w i)⁻¹ • w
have hms : s.weightedVSub p wm = (0 : V) := by simp [wm, hs]
have hwm : ∑ i ∈ s, wm i = 0 := by simp [wm, ← Finset.mul_sum, hw]
have hwmi : wm i = -1 := by simp [wm, his.2]
let w' : { y // y ≠ i } → k := fun x => wm x
have hw' : ∑ x ∈ s', w' x = 1 := by
simp_rw [w', s', Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
rw [← s.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not (· ≠ i)] at hwm
simpa only [not_not, Finset.filter_eq' _ i, if_pos his.1, sum_singleton, hwmi,
add_neg_eq_zero] using hwm
rw [← s.affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one hms his.1 hwmi, ←
(Subtype.range_coe : _ = { x | x ≠ i }), ← Set.range_comp, ←
s.affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter]
exact affineCombination_mem_affineSpan hw' p'
· rw [not_and_or, Classical.not_not] at his
let w' : { y // y ≠ i } → k := fun x => w x
have hw' : ∑ x ∈ s', w' x = 0 := by
simp_rw [w', s', Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
rw [Finset.sum_filter_of_ne, hw]
rintro x hxs hwx rfl
exact hwx (his.neg_resolve_left hxs)
have hs' : s'.weightedVSub p' w' = (0 : V) := by
simp_rw [w', s', p', Finset.weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_filter_of_ne, hs]
rintro x hxs hwx rfl
exact hwx (his.neg_resolve_left hxs)
intro j hj
by_cases hji : j = i
· rw [hji] at hj
exact hji.symm ▸ his.neg_resolve_left hj
· exact ha s' w' hw' hs' ⟨j, hji⟩ (Finset.mem_subtype.2 hj)
/-- If distinct points `p₁` and `p₂` lie in `s` but `p₃` does not, the three points are affinely
independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∉ s) :
AffineIndependent k ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
have ha : AffineIndependent k fun x : { x : Fin 3 // x ≠ 2 } => ![p₁, p₂, p₃] x := by
rw [← affineIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (2 : Fin 3))]
convert affineIndependent_of_ne k hp₁p₂
ext x
fin_cases x <;> rfl
refine ha.affineIndependent_of_not_mem_span ?_
intro h
refine hp₃ ((AffineSubspace.le_def' _ s).1 ?_ p₃ h)
simp_rw [affineSpan_le, Set.image_subset_iff, Set.subset_def, Set.mem_preimage]
intro x
fin_cases x <;> simp +decide [hp₁, hp₂]
/-- If distinct points `p₁` and `p₃` lie in `s` but `p₂` does not, the three points are affinely
independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∉ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [← affineIndependent_equiv (Equiv.swap (1 : Fin 3) 2)]
convert affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem hp₁p₃ hp₁ hp₃ hp₂ using 1
ext x
fin_cases x <;> rfl
/-- If distinct points `p₂` and `p₃` lie in `s` but `p₁` does not, the three points are affinely
independent. -/
theorem affineIndependent_of_ne_of_not_mem_of_mem_of_mem {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) (hp₁ : p₁ ∉ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [← affineIndependent_equiv (Equiv.swap (0 : Fin 3) 2)]
convert affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_mem_of_not_mem hp₂p₃.symm hp₃ hp₂ hp₁ using 1
ext x
fin_cases x <;> rfl
end DivisionRing
section Ordered
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [LinearOrder k] [IsStrictOrderedRing k]
[AddCommGroup V]
variable [Module k V] [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
|
/-- Given an affinely independent family of points, suppose that an affine combination lies in
the span of two points given as affine combinations, and suppose that, for two indices, the
coefficients in the first point in the span are zero and those in the second point in the span
have the same sign. Then the coefficients in the combination lying in the span have the same
sign. -/
theorem sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Independent.lean | 718 | 724 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Chebyshev
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
/-!
# Numerical bounds for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
This file gathers the numerical facts required by the proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.stepBound`: During the inductive step, a partition of size `n` is blown to
size at most `stepBound n`.
* `SzemerediRegularity.initialBound`: The size of the partition we start the induction with.
* `SzemerediRegularity.bound`: The upper bound on the size of the partition produced by our version
of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function Real
namespace SzemerediRegularity
/-- Auxiliary function for Szemerédi's regularity lemma. Blowing up a partition of size `n` during
the induction results in a partition of size at most `stepBound n`. -/
def stepBound (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
n * 4 ^ n
theorem le_stepBound : id ≤ stepBound := fun n =>
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| pow_pos (by norm_num) n
theorem stepBound_mono : Monotone stepBound := fun _ _ h =>
Nat.mul_le_mul h <| Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) h
| theorem stepBound_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < stepBound n ↔ 0 < n :=
mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right <| by positivity
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Bound.lean | 47 | 48 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,693 | 1,698 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
theorem add_den_dvd_lcm (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den.lcm q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq, Nat.div_dvd_iff_dvd_mul (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
(Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right (by simp)), ← Nat.gcd_mul_lcm,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (Nat.lcm_ne_zero (by simp) (by simp)), Nat.dvd_gcd_iff]
refine ⟨?_, dvd_mul_right _ _⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs]
apply Int.dvd_add
<;> apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right <;> rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
<;> [exact Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _; exact Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _]
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).num = q₁.num * q₂.num / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_den (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).den =
q₁.den * q₂.den / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num := by
rw [mul_num, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Int.ofNat_one, Int.ediv_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem mul_self_den (q : ℚ) : (q * q).den = q.den * q.den := by
rw [Rat.mul_den, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem add_num_den (q r : ℚ) :
q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num : ℤ) /. (↑q.den * ↑r.den : ℤ) := by
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.den_pos
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.den_pos
conv_lhs => rw [← num_divInt_den q, ← num_divInt_den r, divInt_add_divInt _ _ hqd hrd]
rw [mul_comm r.num q.den]
theorem isSquare_iff {q : ℚ} : IsSquare q ↔ IsSquare q.num ∧ IsSquare q.den := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨qr, rfl⟩
rw [Rat.mul_self_num, mul_self_den]
simp only [IsSquare.mul_self, and_self]
· rintro ⟨⟨nr, hnr⟩, ⟨dr, hdr⟩⟩
refine ⟨nr / dr, ?_⟩
rw [div_mul_div_comm, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← hnr, ← hdr, num_div_den]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : IsSquare (n : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare n := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, num_natCast, den_natCast, IsSquare.one, and_true, Int.isSquare_natCast_iff]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} : IsSquare (z : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare z := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, intCast_num, intCast_den, IsSquare.one, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem isSquare_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsSquare (ofNat(n) : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
isSquare_natCast_iff
section Casts
theorem exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (n : ℤ) {d : ℤ} (d_ne_zero : d ≠ 0) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).den :=
haveI : (n : ℚ) / d = Rat.divInt n d := by rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div]
Rat.num_den_mk d_ne_zero this
theorem mul_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q * r).num * q.den * r.den = q.num * r.num * (q * r).den := by
let s := q.num * r.num /. (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.num) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
rw [Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_mul_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h, mul_comm, ← Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul, ← divInt_eq_div]
theorem add_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q + r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) * (q + r).den := by
let s := divInt (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
repeat rw [Int.mul_assoc]
apply mul_eq_mul_left_iff.2
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_add_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h]
rw [mul_comm]
apply Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul.mp
rw [← divInt_eq_div]
theorem substr_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q - r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den - r.num * q.den) * (q - r).den := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← num_neg_eq_neg_num, ← den_neg_eq_den r,
add_num_den' q (-r)]
end Casts
protected theorem inv_neg (q : ℚ) : (-q)⁻¹ = -q⁻¹ := by
rw [← num_divInt_den q]
simp only [Rat.neg_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', eq_self_iff_true, Rat.divInt_neg]
theorem num_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
(a / b : ℚ).num = a := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem den_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
((a / b : ℚ).den : ℤ) = b := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem div_int_inj {a b c d : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hd0 : 0 < d) (h1 : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs)
(h2 : Nat.Coprime c.natAbs d.natAbs) (h : (a : ℚ) / b = (c : ℚ) / d) : a = c ∧ b = d := by
apply And.intro
· rw [← num_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, num_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
· rw [← den_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, den_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_div_self (n : ℤ) : ((n / n : ℤ) : ℚ) = n / n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp only [Int.cast_zero, Int.zero_tdiv, zero_div, Int.ediv_zero]
· have : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by rwa [← coe_int_inj] at hn
simp only [Int.ediv_self hn, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff, div_self this]
@[norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div_self (n : ℕ) : ((n / n : ℕ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
intCast_div_self n
theorem intCast_div (a b : ℤ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℤ) : ℚ) = a / b := by
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [mul_comm b, Int.mul_ediv_assoc c (dvd_refl b), Int.cast_mul,
intCast_div_self, Int.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc]
theorem natCast_div (a b : ℕ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℕ) : ℚ) = a / b :=
intCast_div a b (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr h)
theorem den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℤ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m := by
replace hn : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := num_ne_zero.mp hn
constructor
· rw [Rat.den_eq_one_iff, eq_div_iff hn]
exact mod_cast (Dvd.intro_left _)
· exact (intCast_div _ _ · ▸ rfl)
theorem den_div_natCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m :=
(den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff m n (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hn)).trans Int.ofNat_dvd
theorem inv_intCast_num_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply num_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_num_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_intCast_num_of_pos (mod_cast ha0 : 0 < (a : ℤ))
theorem inv_intCast_den_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : ((a : ℚ)⁻¹.den : ℤ) = a := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply den_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
| theorem inv_natCast_den_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = a := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, ← Int.cast_natCast a, inv_intCast_den_of_pos]
rwa [Int.natCast_pos]
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_num (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a := by
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 247 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
/-- Variant of `Ideal.IsPrime.comap` where ideal is explicit rather than implicit. -/
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
H.comap f
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I J : Ideal S) :
(I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
rfl
section Surjective
section
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction (hx := H) (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
end
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
(I : Ideal S) : map e (comap e I) = I :=
I.map_comap_of_surjective e (EquivLike.surjective e)
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
instance (priority := low) (f : R →+* S) [RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) [I.IsTwoSided] :
(I.map f).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left b ha := by
rw [map_eq_submodule_map] at ha ⊢
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := f.surjective b
rw [RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap, ← map_mul]
exact ⟨_, I.mul_mem_right _ ha, rfl⟩
open Function in
theorem IsMaximal.comap_piEvalRingHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
{i : ι} {I : Ideal (R i)} (h : I.IsMaximal) : (I.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i).IsMaximal := by
refine isMaximal_iff.mpr ⟨I.ne_top_iff_one.mp h.ne_top, fun J x le hxI hxJ ↦ ?_⟩
have ⟨r, y, hy, eq⟩ := h.exists_inv hxI
classical
convert J.add_mem (J.mul_mem_left (update 0 i r) hxJ)
(b := update 1 i y) (le <| by apply update_self i y 1 ▸ hy)
ext j
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa [eq_comm] using eq
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I J : Ideal S) :
comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
inj' _ _ eq := SetLike.ext' (Set.preimage_injective.mpr hf <| SetLike.ext'_iff.mp eq)
map_rel_iff' := comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective _ hf ..
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {I : Ideal R}
(H : IsMaximal I) : map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top ↦ ⟨⟨ne_top, fun _J hJ ↦ comap_injective_of_surjective f hf <|
H.1.2 _ (le_comap_map.trans_lt <| (orderEmbeddingOfSurjective f hf).strictMono hJ)⟩⟩
end Surjective
section Injective
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
theorem comap_bot_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm {I : Ideal S} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv (RingEquiv.symm f)
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {y : S} :
f.symm y ∈ I ↔ y ∈ I.map f := by
rw [← comap_symm, mem_comap]
@[simp]
theorem apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {x : R} :
f x ∈ I.map f ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← comap_symm, Ideal.mem_comap, f.symm_apply_apply]
theorem mem_map_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{I : Ideal R} (y : S) : y ∈ map e I ↔ ∃ x ∈ I, e x = y := by
constructor
· intro h
simp_rw [show map e I = _ from map_comap_of_equiv (e : R ≃+* S)] at h
exact ⟨(e : R ≃+* S).symm y, h, (e : R ≃+* S).apply_symm_apply y⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mem_map_of_mem e hx
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f) {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S}
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := map_comap_of_surjective _ hf.2
right_inv J :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ h ↦ have ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf.2).mp h; hf.1 eq ▸ hy)
le_comap_map
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, comap_mono⟩
have := map_mono (f := f) h
simpa only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, map_comap_of_surjective f hf.2] using this
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
lemma comap_map_of_bijective : (I.map f).comap f = I :=
le_antisymm ((comap_le_iff_le_map f hf).mpr fun _ ↦ id) le_comap_map
theorem isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (map f I) ↔ IsMaximal I := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).symm.isCoatom_iff _
theorem isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (comap f K) ↔ IsMaximal K := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).isCoatom_iff _
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.map_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.comap_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective
/-- A ring isomorphism sends a maximal ideal to a maximal ideal. -/
instance map_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (map e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.map_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
/-- The pullback of a maximal ideal under a ring isomorphism is a maximal ideal. -/
instance comap_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal S} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (comap e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.comap_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
theorem isMaximal_iff_of_bijective : (⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h ↦ map_bot (f := f) ▸ h.map_bijective f hf, fun h ↦ have e := RingEquiv.ofBijective f hf
map_bot (f := e.symm) ▸ h.map_bijective _ e.symm.bijective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias map.isMaximal := IsMaximal.map_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias comap.isMaximal := IsMaximal.comap_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff := isMaximal_iff_of_bijective
end Bijective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I : Ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
-- May not hold if `R` is a semiring: consider `ℕ →+* ZMod 2`.
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] :
IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end Surjective
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable (I J : Ideal R) (K L : Ideal S)
protected theorem map_mul {R} [Semiring R] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
(f : F) (I J : Ideal R) :
map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a (semi)ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →+* Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' := Ideal.map_mul f
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_add' I J := Ideal.map_sup f I J
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(Ideal.map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
lemma disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
{p : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} [p.IsPrime] :
Disjoint (I : Set S) (p.primeCompl.map f) ↔ I.comap f ≤ p := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
simp [Set.disjoint_iff, Set.ext_iff, Ideal.primeCompl, not_imp_not, SetLike.le_def]
/-- For a prime ideal `p` of `R`, `p` extended to `S` and
restricted back to `R` is `p` if and only if `p` is the restriction of a prime in `S`. -/
lemma comap_map_eq_self_iff_of_isPrime {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S}
(p : Ideal R) [p.IsPrime] :
(p.map f).comap f = p ↔ (∃ (q : Ideal S), q.IsPrime ∧ q.comap f = p) := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂, hq₃⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_prime_disjoint _ _
(disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mpr hp.le)
exact ⟨q, hq₁, le_antisymm (disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mp hq₃)
(map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hq₂)⟩
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
simp
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
variable (f : F) (g : G)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : Ideal R :=
Ideal.comap f ⊥
instance (priority := low) : (ker f).IsTwoSided := inferInstanceAs (Ideal.comap f ⊥).IsTwoSided
variable {f} in
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero. -/
@[simp] theorem mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 := by rw [ker, Ideal.mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot]
theorem ker_eq : (ker f : Set R) = Set.preimage f {0} :=
rfl
theorem ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = Ideal.comap f ⊥ :=
rfl
theorem comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : (ker f).comap g = ker (f.comp g) := by
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, Ideal.comap_comap, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel. -/
theorem not_one_mem_ker [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : (1 : R) ∉ ker f := by
rw [mem_ker, map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem ker_ne_top [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : ker f ≠ ⊤ :=
(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr <| not_one_mem_ker f
lemma _root_.Pi.ker_ringHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
(φ : ∀ i, S →+* R i) : ker (Pi.ringHom φ) = ⨅ i, ker (φ i) := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Ideal.mem_iInf, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeSRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeSRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
@[simp]
| theorem ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ := by
ext; simp
theorem ker_coe_toRingHom : ker (f : R →+* S) = ker f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_equiv {F' : Type*} [EquivLike F' R S] [RingEquivClass F' R S] (f : F') :
ker f = ⊥ := by
ext; simp
lemma ker_equiv_comp (f : R →+* S) (e : S ≃+* T) :
ker (e.toRingHom.comp f) = RingHom.ker f := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 691 | 702 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
/-!
# Rank one valuations
We define rank one valuations.
## Main Definitions
* `RankOne` : A valuation `v` has rank one if it is nontrivial and its image is contained in `ℝ≥0`.
Note that this class contains the data of the inclusion of the codomain of `v` into `ℝ≥0`.
## Tags
valuation, rank one
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Multiplicative
open scoped NNReal
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {Γ₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
namespace Valuation
/-- A valuation has rank one if it is nontrivial and its image is contained in `ℝ≥0`.
Note that this class includes the data of an inclusion morphism `Γ₀ → ℝ≥0`. -/
class RankOne (v : Valuation R Γ₀) where
/-- The inclusion morphism from `Γ₀` to `ℝ≥0`. -/
hom : Γ₀ →*₀ ℝ≥0
strictMono' : StrictMono hom
nontrivial' : ∃ r : R, v r ≠ 0 ∧ v r ≠ 1
namespace RankOne
variable (v : Valuation R Γ₀) [RankOne v]
lemma strictMono : StrictMono (hom v) := strictMono'
lemma nontrivial : ∃ r : R, v r ≠ 0 ∧ v r ≠ 1 := nontrivial'
/-- If `v` is a rank one valuation and `x : Γ₀` has image `0` under `RankOne.hom v`, then
`x = 0`. -/
theorem zero_of_hom_zero {x : Γ₀} (hx : hom v x = 0) : x = 0 := by
refine (eq_of_le_of_not_lt (zero_le' (a := x)) fun h_lt ↦ ?_).symm
have hs := strictMono v h_lt
rw [map_zero, hx] at hs
exact hs.false
/-- If `v` is a rank one valuation, then`x : Γ₀` has image `0` under `RankOne.hom v` if and
only if `x = 0`. -/
| theorem hom_eq_zero_iff {x : Γ₀} : RankOne.hom v x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_hom_zero v h, fun h ↦ by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/RankOne.lean | 59 | 60 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 2,408 | 2,412 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.Basic
/-!
# M-types
M types are potentially infinite tree-like structures. They are defined
as the greatest fixpoint of a polynomial functor.
-/
universe u v w
open Nat Function
open List
variable (F : PFunctor.{u})
namespace PFunctor
namespace Approx
/-- `CofixA F n` is an `n` level approximation of an M-type -/
inductive CofixA : ℕ → Type u
| continue : CofixA 0
| intro {n} : ∀ a, (F.B a → CofixA n) → CofixA (succ n)
/-- default inhabitant of `CofixA` -/
protected def CofixA.default [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro default fun _ => CofixA.default n
instance [Inhabited F.A] {n} : Inhabited (CofixA F n) :=
⟨CofixA.default F n⟩
theorem cofixA_eq_zero : ∀ x y : CofixA F 0, x = y
| CofixA.continue, CofixA.continue => rfl
variable {F}
/-- The label of the root of the tree for a non-trivial
approximation of the cofix of a pfunctor.
-/
def head' : ∀ {n}, CofixA F (succ n) → F.A
| _, CofixA.intro i _ => i
/-- for a non-trivial approximation, return all the subtrees of the root -/
def children' : ∀ {n} (x : CofixA F (succ n)), F.B (head' x) → CofixA F n
| _, CofixA.intro _ f => f
theorem approx_eta {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (n + 1)) : x = CofixA.intro (head' x) (children' x) := by
cases x; rfl
/-- Relation between two approximations of the cofix of a pfunctor
that state they both contain the same data until one of them is truncated -/
inductive Agree : ∀ {n : ℕ}, CofixA F n → CofixA F (n + 1) → Prop
| continu (x : CofixA F 0) (y : CofixA F 1) : Agree x y
| intro {n} {a} (x : F.B a → CofixA F n) (x' : F.B a → CofixA F (n + 1)) :
(∀ i : F.B a, Agree (x i) (x' i)) → Agree (CofixA.intro a x) (CofixA.intro a x')
/-- Given an infinite series of approximations `approx`,
`AllAgree approx` states that they are all consistent with each other.
-/
def AllAgree (x : ∀ n, CofixA F n) :=
∀ n, Agree (x n) (x (succ n))
@[simp]
theorem agree_trivial {x : CofixA F 0} {y : CofixA F 1} : Agree x y := by constructor
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias agree_trival := agree_trivial
theorem agree_children {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (succ n)) (y : CofixA F (succ n + 1)) {i j}
(h₀ : HEq i j) (h₁ : Agree x y) : Agree (children' x i) (children' y j) := by
obtain - | ⟨_, _, hagree⟩ := h₁; cases h₀
apply hagree
/-- `truncate a` turns `a` into a more limited approximation -/
def truncate : ∀ {n : ℕ}, CofixA F (n + 1) → CofixA F n
| 0, CofixA.intro _ _ => CofixA.continue
| succ _, CofixA.intro i f => CofixA.intro i <| truncate ∘ f
theorem truncate_eq_of_agree {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F n) (y : CofixA F (succ n)) (h : Agree x y) :
truncate y = x := by
induction n <;> cases x <;> cases y
· rfl
· -- cases' h with _ _ _ _ _ h₀ h₁
cases h
simp only [truncate, Function.comp_def, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): used to be `ext y`
rename_i n_ih a f y h₁
suffices (fun x => truncate (y x)) = f
by simp [this]
funext y
apply n_ih
apply h₁
variable {X : Type w}
variable (f : X → F X)
/-- `sCorec f i n` creates an approximation of height `n`
of the final coalgebra of `f` -/
def sCorec : X → ∀ n, CofixA F n
| _, 0 => CofixA.continue
| j, succ _ => CofixA.intro (f j).1 fun i => sCorec ((f j).2 i) _
theorem P_corec (i : X) (n : ℕ) : Agree (sCorec f i n) (sCorec f i (succ n)) := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing i
constructor
obtain ⟨y, g⟩ := f i
constructor
introv
apply n_ih
/-- `Path F` provides indices to access internal nodes in `Corec F` -/
def Path (F : PFunctor.{u}) :=
List F.Idx
instance Path.inhabited : Inhabited (Path F) :=
⟨[]⟩
open List Nat
instance CofixA.instSubsingleton : Subsingleton (CofixA F 0) :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl⟩
theorem head_succ' (n m : ℕ) (x : ∀ n, CofixA F n) (Hconsistent : AllAgree x) :
head' (x (succ n)) = head' (x (succ m)) := by
suffices ∀ n, head' (x (succ n)) = head' (x 1) by simp [this]
clear m n
intro n
rcases h₀ : x (succ n) with - | ⟨_, f₀⟩
cases h₁ : x 1
dsimp only [head']
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [h₁] at h₀
cases h₀
trivial
· have H := Hconsistent (succ n)
cases h₂ : x (succ n)
rw [h₀, h₂] at H
apply n_ih (truncate ∘ f₀)
rw [h₂]
obtain - | ⟨_, _, hagree⟩ := H
congr
funext j
dsimp only [comp_apply]
rw [truncate_eq_of_agree]
apply hagree
end Approx
open Approx
/-- Internal definition for `M`. It is needed to avoid name clashes
between `M.mk` and `M.casesOn` and the declarations generated for
the structure -/
structure MIntl where
/-- An `n`-th level approximation, for each depth `n` -/
approx : ∀ n, CofixA F n
/-- Each approximation agrees with the next -/
consistent : AllAgree approx
/-- For polynomial functor `F`, `M F` is its final coalgebra -/
def M :=
MIntl F
theorem M.default_consistent [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, Agree (default : CofixA F n) default
| 0 => Agree.continu _ _
| succ n => Agree.intro _ _ fun _ => M.default_consistent n
instance M.inhabited [Inhabited F.A] : Inhabited (M F) :=
⟨{ approx := default
consistent := M.default_consistent _ }⟩
instance MIntl.inhabited [Inhabited F.A] : Inhabited (MIntl F) :=
show Inhabited (M F) by infer_instance
namespace M
theorem ext' (x y : M F) (H : ∀ i : ℕ, x.approx i = y.approx i) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
congr with n
apply H
variable {X : Type*}
variable (f : X → F X)
variable {F}
/-- Corecursor for the M-type defined by `F`. -/
protected def corec (i : X) : M F where
approx := sCorec f i
consistent := P_corec _ _
/-- given a tree generated by `F`, `head` gives us the first piece of data
it contains -/
def head (x : M F) :=
head' (x.1 1)
/-- return all the subtrees of the root of a tree `x : M F` -/
def children (x : M F) (i : F.B (head x)) : M F :=
let H := fun n : ℕ => @head_succ' _ n 0 x.1 x.2
{ approx := fun n => children' (x.1 _) (cast (congr_arg _ <| by simp only [head, H]) i)
consistent := by
intro n
have P' := x.2 (succ n)
apply agree_children _ _ _ P'
trans i
· apply cast_heq
symm
apply cast_heq }
/-- select a subtree using an `i : F.Idx` or return an arbitrary tree if
`i` designates no subtree of `x` -/
def ichildren [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] (i : F.Idx) (x : M F) : M F :=
if H' : i.1 = head x then children x (cast (congr_arg _ <| by simp only [head, H']) i.2)
else default
theorem head_succ (n m : ℕ) (x : M F) : head' (x.approx (succ n)) = head' (x.approx (succ m)) :=
head_succ' n m _ x.consistent
theorem head_eq_head' : ∀ (x : M F) (n : ℕ), head x = head' (x.approx <| n + 1)
| ⟨_, h⟩, _ => head_succ' _ _ _ h
theorem head'_eq_head : ∀ (x : M F) (n : ℕ), head' (x.approx <| n + 1) = head x
| ⟨_, h⟩, _ => head_succ' _ _ _ h
theorem truncate_approx (x : M F) (n : ℕ) : truncate (x.approx <| n + 1) = x.approx n :=
truncate_eq_of_agree _ _ (x.consistent _)
/-- unfold an M-type -/
def dest : M F → F (M F)
| x => ⟨head x, fun i => children x i⟩
namespace Approx
/-- generates the approximations needed for `M.mk` -/
protected def sMk (x : F (M F)) : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro x.1 fun i => (x.2 i).approx n
protected theorem P_mk (x : F (M F)) : AllAgree (Approx.sMk x)
| 0 => by constructor
| succ n => by
constructor
introv
apply (x.2 i).consistent
end Approx
/-- constructor for M-types -/
protected def mk (x : F (M F)) : M F where
approx := Approx.sMk x
consistent := Approx.P_mk x
/-- `Agree' n` relates two trees of type `M F` that
are the same up to depth `n` -/
inductive Agree' : ℕ → M F → M F → Prop
| trivial (x y : M F) : Agree' 0 x y
| step {n : ℕ} {a} (x y : F.B a → M F) {x' y'} :
x' = M.mk ⟨a, x⟩ → y' = M.mk ⟨a, y⟩ → (∀ i, Agree' n (x i) (y i)) → Agree' (succ n) x' y'
@[simp]
theorem dest_mk (x : F (M F)) : dest (M.mk x) = x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_dest (x : M F) : M.mk (dest x) = x := by
apply ext'
intro n
dsimp only [M.mk]
induction' n with n
· apply @Subsingleton.elim _ CofixA.instSubsingleton
dsimp only [Approx.sMk, dest, head]
rcases h : x.approx (succ n) with - | ⟨hd, ch⟩
have h' : hd = head' (x.approx 1) := by
rw [← head_succ' n, h, head']
apply x.consistent
revert ch
rw [h']
intros ch h
congr
ext a
dsimp only [children]
generalize hh : cast _ a = a''
rw [cast_eq_iff_heq] at hh
revert a''
rw [h]
intros _ hh
cases hh
rfl
theorem mk_inj {x y : F (M F)} (h : M.mk x = M.mk y) : x = y := by rw [← dest_mk x, h, dest_mk]
/-- destructor for M-types -/
protected def cases {r : M F → Sort w} (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) (x : M F) : r x :=
suffices r (M.mk (dest x)) by
rw [← mk_dest x]
exact this
f _
/-- destructor for M-types -/
protected def casesOn {r : M F → Sort w} (x : M F) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) : r x :=
M.cases f x
/-- destructor for M-types, similar to `casesOn` but also
gives access directly to the root and subtrees on an M-type -/
protected def casesOn' {r : M F → Sort w} (x : M F) (f : ∀ a f, r (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩)) : r x :=
M.casesOn x (fun ⟨a, g⟩ => f a g)
theorem approx_mk (a : F.A) (f : F.B a → M F) (i : ℕ) :
(M.mk ⟨a, f⟩).approx (succ i) = CofixA.intro a fun j => (f j).approx i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem agree'_refl {n : ℕ} (x : M F) : Agree' n x x := by
induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x <;>
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' <;> constructor <;> try rfl
intros
apply n_ih
theorem agree_iff_agree' {n : ℕ} (x y : M F) :
Agree (x.approx n) (y.approx <| n + 1) ↔ Agree' n x y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x y
· constructor
· induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
simp only [approx_mk] at h
obtain - | ⟨_, _, hagree⟩ := h
constructor <;> try rfl
intro i
apply n_ih
apply hagree
· induction' n with _ n_ih generalizing x y
· constructor
· obtain - | @⟨_, a, x', y'⟩ := h
induction' x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with x_a x_f
induction' y using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with y_a y_f
simp only [approx_mk]
have h_a_1 := mk_inj ‹M.mk ⟨x_a, x_f⟩ = M.mk ⟨a, x'⟩›
cases h_a_1
replace h_a_2 := mk_inj ‹M.mk ⟨y_a, y_f⟩ = M.mk ⟨a, y'⟩›
cases h_a_2
constructor
intro i
apply n_ih
simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem cases_mk {r : M F → Sort*} (x : F (M F)) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) :
PFunctor.M.cases f (M.mk x) = f x := by
dsimp only [M.mk, PFunctor.M.cases, dest, head, Approx.sMk, head']
cases x; dsimp only [Approx.sMk]
simp only [Eq.mpr]
apply congrFun
rfl
@[simp]
theorem casesOn_mk {r : M F → Sort*} (x : F (M F)) (f : ∀ x : F (M F), r (M.mk x)) :
PFunctor.M.casesOn (M.mk x) f = f x :=
cases_mk x f
@[simp]
theorem casesOn_mk' {r : M F → Sort*} {a} (x : F.B a → M F)
(f : ∀ (a) (f : F.B a → M F), r (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩)) :
PFunctor.M.casesOn' (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩) f = f a x :=
@cases_mk F r ⟨a, x⟩ (fun ⟨a, g⟩ => f a g)
/-- `IsPath p x` tells us if `p` is a valid path through `x` -/
inductive IsPath : Path F → M F → Prop
| nil (x : M F) : IsPath [] x
| cons (xs : Path F) {a} (x : M F) (f : F.B a → M F) (i : F.B a) :
x = M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ → IsPath xs (f i) → IsPath (⟨a, i⟩ :: xs) x
theorem isPath_cons {xs : Path F} {a a'} {f : F.B a → M F} {i : F.B a'} :
IsPath (⟨a', i⟩ :: xs) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) → a = a' := by
generalize h : M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ = x
rintro (_ | ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, _⟩)
cases mk_inj h
rfl
theorem isPath_cons' {xs : Path F} {a} {f : F.B a → M F} {i : F.B a} :
IsPath (⟨a, i⟩ :: xs) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) → IsPath xs (f i) := by
generalize h : M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ = x
rintro (_ | ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, hp⟩)
cases mk_inj h
exact hp
/-- follow a path through a value of `M F` and return the subtree
found at the end of the path if it is a valid path for that value and
return a default tree -/
def isubtree [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] : Path F → M F → M F
| [], x => x
| ⟨a, i⟩ :: ps, x =>
PFunctor.M.casesOn' (r := fun _ => M F) x (fun a' f =>
if h : a = a' then
isubtree ps (f <| cast (by rw [h]) i)
else
default (α := M F)
)
/-- similar to `isubtree` but returns the data at the end of the path instead
of the whole subtree -/
def iselect [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) : M F → F.A := fun x : M F =>
head <| isubtree ps x
theorem iselect_eq_default [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) (x : M F)
(h : ¬IsPath ps x) : iselect ps x = head default := by
induction' ps with ps_hd ps_tail ps_ih generalizing x
· exfalso
apply h
constructor
· obtain ⟨a, i⟩ := ps_hd
induction' x using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with x_a x_f
simp only [iselect, isubtree] at ps_ih ⊢
by_cases h'' : a = x_a
· subst x_a
simp only [dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true, casesOn_mk']
rw [ps_ih]
intro h'
apply h
constructor <;> try rfl
apply h'
· simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem head_mk (x : F (M F)) : head (M.mk x) = x.1 :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x.1 = (dest (M.mk x)).1 := by rw [dest_mk]
_ = head (M.mk x) := rfl
theorem children_mk {a} (x : F.B a → M F) (i : F.B (head (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩))) :
children (M.mk ⟨a, x⟩) i = x (cast (by rw [head_mk]) i) := by apply ext'; intro n; rfl
@[simp]
theorem ichildren_mk [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (x : F (M F)) (i : F.Idx) :
ichildren i (M.mk x) = x.iget i := by
dsimp only [ichildren, PFunctor.Obj.iget]
congr with h
@[simp]
theorem isubtree_cons [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) {a} (f : F.B a → M F)
{i : F.B a} : isubtree (⟨_, i⟩ :: ps) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = isubtree ps (f i) := by
simp only [isubtree, ichildren_mk, PFunctor.Obj.iget, dif_pos, isubtree, M.casesOn_mk']; rfl
@[simp]
theorem iselect_nil [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] {a} (f : F.B a → M F) :
iselect nil (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem iselect_cons [DecidableEq F.A] [Inhabited (M F)] (ps : Path F) {a} (f : F.B a → M F) {i} :
iselect (⟨a, i⟩ :: ps) (M.mk ⟨a, f⟩) = iselect ps (f i) := by simp only [iselect, isubtree_cons]
theorem corec_def {X} (f : X → F X) (x₀ : X) : M.corec f x₀ = M.mk (F.map (M.corec f) (f x₀)) := by
dsimp only [M.corec, M.mk]
congr with n
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp only [sCorec, Approx.sMk]
· dsimp only [sCorec, Approx.sMk]
cases f x₀
dsimp only [PFunctor.map]
congr
theorem ext_aux [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] {n : ℕ} (x y z : M F) (hx : Agree' n z x)
(hy : Agree' n z y) (hrec : ∀ ps : Path F, n = ps.length → iselect ps x = iselect ps y) :
x.approx (n + 1) = y.approx (n + 1) := by
induction' n with n n_ih generalizing x y z
· specialize hrec [] rfl
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
simp only [iselect_nil] at hrec
subst hrec
simp only [approx_mk, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, zero_eq, CofixA.intro.injEq,
heq_eq_eq, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, and_self]
· cases hx
cases hy
induction x using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
induction y using PFunctor.M.casesOn'
subst z
iterate 3 (have := mk_inj ‹_›; cases this)
rename_i n_ih a f₃ f₂ hAgree₂ _ _ h₂ _ _ f₁ h₁ hAgree₁ clr
simp only [approx_mk, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
have := mk_inj h₁
cases this; clear h₁
have := mk_inj h₂
cases this; clear h₂
congr
ext i
apply n_ih
· solve_by_elim
· solve_by_elim
introv h
specialize hrec (⟨_, i⟩ :: ps) (congr_arg _ h)
simp only [iselect_cons] at hrec
exact hrec
open PFunctor.Approx
theorem ext [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A] (x y : M F)
(H : ∀ ps : Path F, iselect ps x = iselect ps y) :
x = y := by
apply ext'; intro i
induction' i with i i_ih
· cases x.approx 0
cases y.approx 0
constructor
· apply ext_aux x y x
· rw [← agree_iff_agree']
apply x.consistent
· rw [← agree_iff_agree', i_ih]
apply y.consistent
introv H'
dsimp only [iselect] at H
cases H'
apply H ps
section Bisim
variable (R : M F → M F → Prop)
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimulation is the standard proof technique for equality between
infinite tree-like structures -/
structure IsBisimulation : Prop where
/-- The head of the trees are equal -/
head : ∀ {a a'} {f f'}, M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ~ M.mk ⟨a', f'⟩ → a = a'
/-- The tails are equal -/
tail : ∀ {a} {f f' : F.B a → M F}, M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ~ M.mk ⟨a, f'⟩ → ∀ i : F.B a, f i ~ f' i
theorem nth_of_bisim [Inhabited (M F)] [DecidableEq F.A]
(bisim : IsBisimulation R) (s₁ s₂) (ps : Path F) :
(R s₁ s₂) →
IsPath ps s₁ ∨ IsPath ps s₂ →
iselect ps s₁ = iselect ps s₂ ∧
∃ (a : _) (f f' : F.B a → M F),
isubtree ps s₁ = M.mk ⟨a, f⟩ ∧
isubtree ps s₂ = M.mk ⟨a, f'⟩ ∧ ∀ i : F.B a, f i ~ f' i := by
intro h₀ hh
induction' s₁ using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a f
induction' s₂ using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a' f'
obtain rfl : a = a' := bisim.head h₀
induction' ps with i ps ps_ih generalizing a f f'
· exists rfl, a, f, f', rfl, rfl
apply bisim.tail h₀
obtain ⟨a', i⟩ := i
obtain rfl : a = a' := by rcases hh with hh|hh <;> cases isPath_cons hh <;> rfl
dsimp only [iselect] at ps_ih ⊢
have h₁ := bisim.tail h₀ i
induction' h : f i using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a₀ f₀
induction' h' : f' i using PFunctor.M.casesOn' with a₁ f₁
simp only [h, h', isubtree_cons] at ps_ih ⊢
rw [h, h'] at h₁
obtain rfl : a₀ = a₁ := bisim.head h₁
apply ps_ih _ _ _ h₁
rw [← h, ← h']
apply Or.imp isPath_cons' isPath_cons' hh
theorem eq_of_bisim [Nonempty (M F)] (bisim : IsBisimulation R) : ∀ s₁ s₂, R s₁ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := by
inhabit M F
classical
introv Hr; apply ext
introv
by_cases h : IsPath ps s₁ ∨ IsPath ps s₂
· have H := nth_of_bisim R bisim _ _ ps Hr h
exact H.left
· rw [not_or] at h
obtain ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ := h
simp only [iselect_eq_default, *, not_false_iff]
end Bisim
universe u' v'
/-- corecursor for `M F` with swapped arguments -/
def corecOn {X : Type*} (x₀ : X) (f : X → F X) : M F :=
M.corec f x₀
variable {P : PFunctor.{u}} {α : Type*}
theorem dest_corec (g : α → P α) (x : α) : M.dest (M.corec g x) = P.map (M.corec g) (g x) := by
rw [corec_def, dest_mk]
theorem bisim (R : M P → M P → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, R x y → ∃ a f f', M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ M.dest y = ⟨a, f'⟩ ∧ ∀ i, R (f i) (f' i)) :
∀ x y, R x y → x = y := by
introv h'
haveI := Inhabited.mk x.head
apply eq_of_bisim R _ _ _ h'; clear h' x y
constructor <;> introv ih <;> rcases h _ _ ih with ⟨a'', g, g', h₀, h₁, h₂⟩ <;> clear h
· replace h₀ := congr_arg Sigma.fst h₀
replace h₁ := congr_arg Sigma.fst h₁
simp only [dest_mk] at h₀ h₁
rw [h₀, h₁]
· simp only [dest_mk] at h₀ h₁
cases h₀
cases h₁
apply h₂
theorem bisim' {α : Type*} (Q : α → Prop) (u v : α → M P)
(h : ∀ x, Q x → ∃ a f f',
M.dest (u x) = ⟨a, f⟩
∧ M.dest (v x) = ⟨a, f'⟩
∧ ∀ i, ∃ x', Q x' ∧ f i = u x' ∧ f' i = v x') :
∀ x, Q x → u x = v x := fun x Qx =>
let R := fun w z : M P => ∃ x', Q x' ∧ w = u x' ∧ z = v x'
@M.bisim P R
(fun _ _ ⟨x', Qx', xeq, yeq⟩ =>
let ⟨a, f, f', ux'eq, vx'eq, h'⟩ := h x' Qx'
⟨a, f, f', xeq.symm ▸ ux'eq, yeq.symm ▸ vx'eq, h'⟩)
_ _ ⟨x, Qx, rfl, rfl⟩
-- for the record, show M_bisim follows from _bisim'
theorem bisim_equiv (R : M P → M P → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, R x y → ∃ a f f', M.dest x = ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ M.dest y = ⟨a, f'⟩ ∧ ∀ i, R (f i) (f' i)) :
∀ x y, R x y → x = y := fun x y Rxy =>
let Q : M P × M P → Prop := fun p => R p.fst p.snd
bisim' Q Prod.fst Prod.snd
(fun p Qp =>
let ⟨a, f, f', hx, hy, h'⟩ := h p.fst p.snd Qp
⟨a, f, f', hx, hy, fun i => ⟨⟨f i, f' i⟩, h' i, rfl, rfl⟩⟩)
⟨x, y⟩ Rxy
theorem corec_unique (g : α → P α) (f : α → M P) (hyp : ∀ x, M.dest (f x) = P.map f (g x)) :
f = M.corec g := by
ext x
apply bisim' (fun _ => True) _ _ _ _ trivial
clear x
intro x _
rcases gxeq : g x with ⟨a, f'⟩
have h₀ : M.dest (f x) = ⟨a, f ∘ f'⟩ := by rw [hyp, gxeq, PFunctor.map_eq]
have h₁ : M.dest (M.corec g x) = ⟨a, M.corec g ∘ f'⟩ := by rw [dest_corec, gxeq, PFunctor.map_eq]
refine ⟨_, _, _, h₀, h₁, ?_⟩
intro i
exact ⟨f' i, trivial, rfl, rfl⟩
/-- corecursor where the state of the computation can be sent downstream
in the form of a recursive call -/
def corec₁ {α : Type u} (F : ∀ X, (α → X) → α → P X) : α → M P :=
M.corec (F _ id)
/-- corecursor where it is possible to return a fully formed value at any point
of the computation -/
def corec' {α : Type u} (F : ∀ {X : Type u}, (α → X) → α → M P ⊕ P X) (x : α) : M P :=
corec₁
(fun _ rec (a : M P ⊕ α) =>
let y := a >>= F (rec ∘ Sum.inr)
match y with
| Sum.inr y => y
| Sum.inl y => P.map (rec ∘ Sum.inl) (M.dest y))
(@Sum.inr (M P) _ x)
end M
end PFunctor
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/M.lean | 690 | 699 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
/-!
# Topological groups
This file defines the following typeclasses:
* `IsTopologicalGroup`, `IsTopologicalAddGroup`: multiplicative and additive topological groups,
i.e., groups with continuous `(*)` and `(⁻¹)` / `(+)` and `(-)`;
* `ContinuousSub G` means that `G` has a continuous subtraction operation.
There is an instance deducing `ContinuousSub` from `IsTopologicalGroup` but we use a separate
typeclass because, e.g., `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0` have continuous subtraction but are not additive groups.
We also define `Homeomorph` versions of several `Equiv`s: `Homeomorph.mulLeft`,
`Homeomorph.mulRight`, `Homeomorph.inv`, and prove a few facts about neighbourhood filters in
groups.
## Tags
topological space, group, topological group
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function Topology MulOpposite Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {G : Type w} {H : Type x} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### Groups with continuous multiplication
In this section we prove a few statements about groups with continuous `(*)`.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Multiplication from the left in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the left in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulLeft (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.coe_mulLeft (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulLeft a) = (a * ·) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulLeft_symm (a : G) : (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).symm = Homeomorph.mulLeft a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma isOpenMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsOpenMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.left_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_left x _ h
@[to_additive]
lemma isClosedMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsClosedMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.left_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_left x _ h
/-- Multiplication from the right in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the right in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulRight (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulRight a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_mulRight (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulRight a) = (· * a) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulRight_symm (a : G) :
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).symm = Homeomorph.mulRight a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsOpenMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.right_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (op x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsClosedMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.right_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (op x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one (h : IsOpen ({1} : Set G)) :
DiscreteTopology G := by
rw [← singletons_open_iff_discrete]
intro g
suffices {g} = (g⁻¹ * ·) ⁻¹' {1} by
rw [this]
exact (continuous_mul_left g⁻¹).isOpen_preimage _ h
simp only [mul_one, Set.preimage_mul_left_singleton, eq_self_iff_true, inv_inv,
Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_iff_isOpen_singleton_one : DiscreteTopology G ↔ IsOpen ({1} : Set G) :=
⟨fun h => forall_open_iff_discrete.mpr h {1}, discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one⟩
end ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### `ContinuousInv` and `ContinuousNeg`
-/
section ContinuousInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [ContinuousInv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.induced {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [Group α]
[DivisionMonoid β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [ContinuousInv β] (f : F) :
@ContinuousInv α (tβ.induced f) _ := by
let _tα := tβ.induced f
refine ⟨continuous_induced_rng.2 ?_⟩
simp only [Function.comp_def, map_inv]
fun_prop
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.inv {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : (x⁻¹) ⤳ (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.inv {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) : Inseparable (x⁻¹) (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : ∀ m : ℤ, (x ^ m) ⤳ (y ^ m)
| .ofNat n => by simpa using h.pow n
| .negSucc n => by simpa using (h.pow (n + 1)).inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) (m : ℤ) :
Inseparable (x ^ m) (y ^ m) :=
(h.specializes.zpow m).antisymm (h.specializes'.zpow m)
@[to_additive]
instance : ContinuousInv (ULift G) :=
⟨continuous_uliftUp.comp (continuous_inv.comp continuous_uliftDown)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_inv {s : Set G} : ContinuousOn Inv.inv s :=
continuous_inv.continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inv {s : Set G} {x : G} : ContinuousWithinAt Inv.inv s x :=
continuous_inv.continuousWithinAt
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_inv {x : G} : ContinuousAt Inv.inv x :=
continuous_inv.continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv (a : G) : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a⁻¹) :=
continuousAt_inv
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instContinuousInv : ContinuousInv Gᵒᵈ := ‹ContinuousInv G›
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.continuousInv [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] :
ContinuousInv (G × H) :=
⟨continuous_inv.fst'.prodMk continuous_inv.snd'⟩
variable {ι : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.continuousInv {C : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (C i)] [∀ i, Inv (C i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousInv (C i)] : ContinuousInv (∀ i, C i) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
/-- A version of `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. It is needed because sometimes
Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions. It is needed
because sometimes Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions."]
instance Pi.has_continuous_inv' : ContinuousInv (ι → G) :=
Pi.continuousInv
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) continuousInv_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H]
[DiscreteTopology H] : ContinuousInv H :=
⟨continuous_of_discreteTopology⟩
section PointwiseLimits
variable (G₁ G₂ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G₂] [T2Space G₂]
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosed_setOf_map_inv [Inv G₁] [Inv G₂] [ContinuousInv G₂] :
IsClosed { f : G₁ → G₂ | ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹ } := by
simp only [setOf_forall]
exact isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_eq (continuous_apply _) (continuous_apply _).inv
end PointwiseLimits
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] : ContinuousNeg (Additive H) where
continuous_neg := @continuous_inv H _ _ _
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Neg H] [ContinuousNeg H] : ContinuousInv (Multiplicative H) where
continuous_inv := @continuous_neg H _ _ _
end ContinuousInv
section ContinuousInvolutiveInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] {s : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.inv (hs : IsCompact s) : IsCompact s⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv_eq_inv]
exact hs.image continuous_inv
variable (G)
/-- Inversion in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Negation in a topological group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.inv (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G]
[ContinuousInv G] : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.inv G with
continuous_toFun := continuous_inv
continuous_invFun := continuous_inv }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_inv {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] :
⇑(Homeomorph.inv G) = Inv.inv := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_inv (a : G) : 𝓝 a⁻¹ = (𝓝 a)⁻¹ :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq a).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_inv : IsOpenMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_inv : IsClosedMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isClosedMap
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOpen.inv (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem IsClosed.inv (hs : IsClosed s) : IsClosed s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_closure : ∀ s : Set G, (closure s)⁻¹ = closure s⁻¹ :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).preimage_closure
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuous_inv_iff : Continuous f⁻¹ ↔ Continuous f := (Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuous_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousAt_inv_iff : ContinuousAt f⁻¹ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousAt_iff _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousOn_inv_iff : ContinuousOn f⁻¹ s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Continuous.of_inv, _⟩ := continuous_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousAt.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousAt_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousOn.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousOn_inv_iff
end ContinuousInvolutiveInv
section LatticeOps
variable {ι' : Sort*} [Inv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_sInf {ts : Set (TopologicalSpace G)}
(h : ∀ t ∈ ts, @ContinuousInv G t _) : @ContinuousInv G (sInf ts) _ :=
letI := sInf ts
{ continuous_inv :=
continuous_sInf_rng.2 fun t ht =>
continuous_sInf_dom ht (@ContinuousInv.continuous_inv G t _ (h t ht)) }
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_iInf {ts' : ι' → TopologicalSpace G}
(h' : ∀ i, @ContinuousInv G (ts' i) _) : @ContinuousInv G (⨅ i, ts' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact continuousInv_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace G} (h₁ : @ContinuousInv G t₁ _)
(h₂ : @ContinuousInv G t₂ _) : @ContinuousInv G (t₁ ⊓ t₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine continuousInv_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
end LatticeOps
@[to_additive]
theorem Topology.IsInducing.continuousInv {G H : Type*} [Inv G] [Inv H] [TopologicalSpace G]
[TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousInv H] {f : G → H} (hf : IsInducing f)
(hf_inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) : ContinuousInv G :=
⟨hf.continuous_iff.2 <| by simpa only [Function.comp_def, hf_inv] using hf.continuous.inv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.continuousInv := IsInducing.continuousInv
section IsTopologicalGroup
/-!
### Topological groups
A topological group is a group in which the multiplication and inversion operations are
continuous. Topological additive groups are defined in the same way. Equivalently, we can require
that the division operation `x y ↦ x * y⁻¹` (resp., subtraction) is continuous.
-/
section Conj
instance ConjAct.units_continuousConstSMul {M} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] : ContinuousConstSMul (ConjAct Mˣ) M :=
⟨fun _ => (continuous_const.mul continuous_id).mul continuous_const⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [Mul G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `mul` and `inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive continuous_addConj_prod
"Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj_prod [ContinuousInv G] :
Continuous fun g : G × G => g.fst * g.snd * g.fst⁻¹ :=
continuous_mul.mul (continuous_inv.comp continuous_fst)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_conj_sum := IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_addConj_prod
/-- Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `mul` is continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `add` is continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj (g : G) : Continuous fun h : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right g⁻¹).comp (continuous_mul_left g)
/-- Conjugation acting on fixed element of the group is continuous when both `mul` and
`inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation acting on fixed element of the additive group is continuous when both
`add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj' [ContinuousInv G] (h : G) :
Continuous fun g : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right h).mul continuous_inv
end Conj
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G}
{s : Set α} {x : α}
instance : IsTopologicalGroup (ULift G) where
section ZPow
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem continuous_zpow : ∀ z : ℤ, Continuous fun a : G => a ^ z
| Int.ofNat n => by simpa using continuous_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => by simpa using (continuous_pow (n + 1)).inv
instance AddGroup.continuousConstSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousConstSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_zsmul⟩
instance AddGroup.continuousSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_prod_of_discrete_left.mpr continuous_zsmul⟩
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem Continuous.zpow {f : α → G} (h : Continuous f) (z : ℤ) : Continuous fun b => f b ^ z :=
(continuous_zpow z).comp h
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_zpow {s : Set G} (z : ℤ) : ContinuousOn (fun x => x ^ z) s :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_zpow (x : G) (z : ℤ) : ContinuousAt (fun x => x ^ z) x :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.zpow {α} {l : Filter α} {f : α → G} {x : G} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
(z : ℤ) : Tendsto (fun x => f x ^ z) l (𝓝 (x ^ z)) :=
(continuousAt_zpow _ _).tendsto.comp hf
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(z : ℤ) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ z) s x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x ^ z) x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousOn.zpow {f : α → G} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x ^ z) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).zpow z
end ZPow
section OrderedCommGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [CommGroup H] [PartialOrder H] [IsOrderedMonoid H] [ContinuousInv H]
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) (𝓝[<] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) (𝓝[>] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a) (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a) (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≤] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≥] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv
end OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.instIsTopologicalGroup [TopologicalSpace H] [Group H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] :
IsTopologicalGroup (G × H) where
continuous_inv := continuous_inv.prodMap continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instIsTopologicalGroup : IsTopologicalGroup Gᵒᵈ where
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.topologicalGroup {C : β → Type*} [∀ b, TopologicalSpace (C b)] [∀ b, Group (C b)]
[∀ b, IsTopologicalGroup (C b)] : IsTopologicalGroup (∀ b, C b) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] [ContinuousInv α] : ContinuousInv αᵐᵒᵖ :=
opHomeomorph.symm.isInducing.continuousInv unop_inv
/-- If multiplication is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[to_additive "If addition is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵃᵒᵖ`."]
instance [Group α] [IsTopologicalGroup α] : IsTopologicalGroup αᵐᵒᵖ where
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm : comap Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).comap_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm' : map Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_nhds_one {S : Set G} (hS : S ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G)) : S⁻¹ ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := by
rwa [← nhds_one_symm'] at hS
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x * y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping."]
protected def Homeomorph.shearMulRight : G × G ≃ₜ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
continuous_toFun := by dsimp; fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by dsimp; fun_prop }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G) = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_symm_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G).symm = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2) :=
rfl
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.topologicalGroup {F : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G] (f : F) (hf : IsInducing f) : IsTopologicalGroup H :=
{ toContinuousMul := hf.continuousMul _
toContinuousInv := hf.continuousInv (map_inv f) }
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.topologicalGroup := IsInducing.topologicalGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_induced {F : Type*} [Group H] [FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G]
(f : F) :
@IsTopologicalGroup H (induced f ‹_›) _ :=
letI := induced f ‹_›
IsInducing.topologicalGroup f ⟨rfl⟩
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance (S : Subgroup G) : IsTopologicalGroup S :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.topologicalGroup S.subtype
end Subgroup
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a subgroup of a topological group is
itself a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The (topological-space) closure of an additive subgroup of an additive topological group is
itself an additive subgroup."]
def Subgroup.topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
carrier := _root_.closure (s : Set G)
inv_mem' := fun {g} hg => by simpa only [← Set.mem_inv, inv_closure, inv_coe_set] using hg }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe {s : Subgroup G} :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.le_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
_root_.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set G) := isClosed_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Subgroup G) {t : Subgroup G} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set G)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
@[to_additive]
theorem DenseRange.topologicalClosure_map_subgroup [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[IsTopologicalGroup H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Continuous f) (hf' : DenseRange f) {s : Subgroup G}
(hs : s.topologicalClosure = ⊤) : (s.map f).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff] at hs ⊢
simp only [Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe, Subgroup.coe_top, ← dense_iff_closure_eq] at hs ⊢
exact hf'.dense_image hf hs
/-- The topological closure of a normal subgroup is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The topological closure of a normal additive subgroup is normal."]
theorem Subgroup.is_normal_topologicalClosure {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] (N : Subgroup G) [N.Normal] :
(Subgroup.topologicalClosure N).Normal where
conj_mem n hn g := by
apply map_mem_closure (IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj g) hn
exact fun m hm => Subgroup.Normal.conj_mem inferInstance m hm g
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [MulOneClass G]
[ContinuousMul G] {g h : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G))
(hh : h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) : g * h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [connectedComponent_eq hg]
have hmul : g ∈ connectedComponent (g * h) := by
apply Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset (continuous_mul_left g)
rw [← connectedComponent_eq hh]
exact ⟨(1 : G), mem_connectedComponent, by simp only [mul_one]⟩
simpa [← connectedComponent_eq hmul] using mem_connectedComponent
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [DivisionMonoid G]
[ContinuousInv G] {g : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) :
g⁻¹ ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [← inv_one]
exact
Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset continuous_inv _
((Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩)
/-- The connected component of 1 is a subgroup of `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The connected component of 0 is a subgroup of `G`."]
def Subgroup.connectedComponentOfOne (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] : Subgroup G where
carrier := connectedComponent (1 : G)
one_mem' := mem_connectedComponent
mul_mem' hg hh := mul_mem_connectedComponent_one hg hh
inv_mem' hg := inv_mem_connectedComponent_one hg
/-- If a subgroup of a topological group is commutative, then so is its topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[to_additive
"If a subgroup of an additive topological group is commutative, then so is its
topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]."]
abbrev Subgroup.commGroupTopologicalClosure [T2Space G] (s : Subgroup G)
(hs : ∀ x y : s, x * y = y * x) : CommGroup s.topologicalClosure :=
{ s.topologicalClosure.toGroup, s.toSubmonoid.commMonoidTopologicalClosure hs with }
variable (G) in
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.coe_topologicalClosure_bot :
((⊥ : Subgroup G).topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure ({1} : Set G) := by simp
@[to_additive exists_nhds_half_neg]
theorem exists_nhds_split_inv {s : Set G} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G)) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), ∀ v ∈ V, ∀ w ∈ V, v / w ∈ s := by
have : (fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2⁻¹) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 ((1, 1) : G × G) :=
continuousAt_fst.mul continuousAt_snd.inv (by simpa)
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_self_iff, prod_subset_iff, mem_preimage] using
this
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_translation_mul_inv (x : G) : comap (· * x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight x⁻¹).comap_nhds_eq 1).trans <| show 𝓝 (1 * x⁻¹⁻¹) = 𝓝 x by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds (x y : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (x * y) :=
(Homeomorph.mulLeft x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds_one (x : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds (x y : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (y * x) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds_one (x : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_of_one {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set G}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓝 1 : Filter G) p s) (x : G) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) p fun i => { y | y / x ∈ s i } := by
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv]
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hb.comap _
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_one {x : G} {s : Set G} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ U ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G), ∃ y ∈ s, y / x ∈ U := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis ((𝓝 1 : Filter G).basis_sets.nhds_of_one x)]
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, id]
/-- A monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements `MonoidHomClass`) from a
topological group to a topological monoid is continuous provided that it is continuous at one. See
also `uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements
`AddMonoidHomClass`) from an additive topological group to an additive topological monoid is
continuous provided that it is continuous at zero. See also
`uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero`."]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one {M hom : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [FunLike hom G M] [MonoidHomClass hom G M] (f : hom)
(hf : ContinuousAt f 1) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => by
simpa only [ContinuousAt, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def,
map_mul, map_one, mul_one] using hf.tendsto.const_mul (f x)
@[to_additive continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one₂ {H M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] (f : G →* H →* M)
(hf : ContinuousAt (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) (1, 1))
(hl : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (f x) 1) (hr : ∀ y, ContinuousAt (f · y) 1) :
Continuous (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) := continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun (x, y) => by
simp only [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one y,
prod_map_map_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, map_mul, MonoidHom.mul_apply] at *
refine ((tendsto_const_nhds.mul ((hr y).comp tendsto_fst)).mul
(((hl x).comp tendsto_snd).mul hf)).mono_right (le_of_eq ?_)
simp only [map_one, mul_one, MonoidHom.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsTopologicalGroup.isInducing_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] {F : Type*}
[FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
Topology.IsInducing f ↔ 𝓝 (1 : G) = (𝓝 (1 : H)).comap f := by
rw [Topology.isInducing_iff_nhds]
refine ⟨(map_one f ▸ · 1), fun hf x ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv, ← nhds_translation_mul_inv (f x), Filter.comap_comap, hf,
Filter.comap_comap]
congr 1
ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma TopologicalGroup.isOpenMap_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Monoid H] [TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousConstSMul H H]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ 𝓝 1 ≤ .map f (𝓝 1) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ map_one f ▸ H.nhds_le 1, fun h ↦ IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_⟩
have : Filter.map (f x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 (f x) := by
simpa [-Homeomorph.map_nhds_eq, Units.smul_def] using
(Homeomorph.smul ((toUnits x).map (MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom f))).map_nhds_eq (1 : H)
rw [← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def, ← this]
refine (Filter.map_mono h).trans ?_
simp [Function.comp_def]
-- TODO: unify with `QuotientGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk`
/-- Let `A` and `B` be topological groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous surjective group
homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map. -/
@[to_additive "Let `A` and `B` be topological additive groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous
surjective additive group homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map."]
lemma MonoidHom.isOpenQuotientMap_of_isQuotientMap {A : Type*} [Group A]
[TopologicalSpace A] [ContinuousMul A] {B : Type*} [Group B] [TopologicalSpace B]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [MonoidHomClass F A B] {φ : F}
(hφ : IsQuotientMap φ) : IsOpenQuotientMap φ where
surjective := hφ.surjective
continuous := hφ.continuous
isOpenMap := by
-- We need to check that if `U ⊆ A` is open then `φ⁻¹ (φ U)` is open.
intro U hU
rw [← hφ.isOpen_preimage]
-- It suffices to show that `φ⁻¹ (φ U) = ⋃ (U * k⁻¹)` as `k` runs through the kernel of `φ`,
-- as `U * k⁻¹` is open because `x ↦ x * k` is continuous.
-- Remark: here is where we use that we have groups not monoids (you cannot avoid
-- using both `k` and `k⁻¹` at this point).
suffices ⇑φ ⁻¹' (⇑φ '' U) = ⋃ k ∈ ker (φ : A →* B), (fun x ↦ x * k) ⁻¹' U by
exact this ▸ isOpen_biUnion (fun k _ ↦ Continuous.isOpen_preimage (by fun_prop) _ hU)
ext x
-- But this is an elementary calculation.
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hyU, hyx⟩
apply Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem (x⁻¹ * y)
simp_all
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, _, ⟨(hk : φ k = 1), rfl⟩, hx⟩
use x * k, hx
rw [map_mul, hk, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _)
(h : @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1) : t = t' :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t _ _ x, ← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t' _ _ x, ← h]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _) :
t = t' ↔ @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, tg.ext tg'⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one {G : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x : G => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (fun x : G => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : ContinuousInv G := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x₀ => ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x => x₀⁻¹ * (x₀ * x⁻¹ * x₀⁻¹)) (𝓝 1) (map (x₀⁻¹ * ·) (𝓝 1)) :=
(tendsto_map.comp <| hconj x₀).comp hinv
simpa only [ContinuousAt, hleft x₀, hleft x₀⁻¹, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, mul_assoc,
mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_left] using this
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hright : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x * x₀) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
{ toContinuousMul := ContinuousMul.of_nhds_one hmul hleft hright
toContinuousInv :=
ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one hinv hleft fun x₀ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [show (fun x => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) = (fun x => x * x₀⁻¹) ∘ fun x => x₀ * x from rfl, ←
map_map, ← hleft, hright, map_map]
simp [(· ∘ ·)]) }
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
| (hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G := by
refine IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' hmul hinv hleft fun x₀ => ?_
replace hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, map (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 1 :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 854 | 859 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
/-!
# Normed bump function
In this file we define `ContDiffBump.normed f μ` to be the bump function `f` normalized so that
`∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1` and prove some properties of this function.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Filter Set Metric MeasureTheory Module Measure
open scoped Topology
namespace ContDiffBump
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [HasContDiffBump E]
[MeasurableSpace E] {c : E} (f : ContDiffBump c) {x : E} {n : ℕ∞} {μ : Measure E}
/-- A bump function normed so that `∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1`. -/
protected def normed (μ : Measure E) : E → ℝ := fun x => f x / ∫ x, f x ∂μ
theorem normed_def {μ : Measure E} (x : E) : f.normed μ x = f x / ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
rfl
theorem nonneg_normed (x : E) : 0 ≤ f.normed μ x :=
div_nonneg f.nonneg <| integral_nonneg f.nonneg'
theorem contDiff_normed {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiff ℝ n (f.normed μ) :=
f.contDiff.div_const _
theorem continuous_normed : Continuous (f.normed μ) :=
f.continuous.div_const _
theorem normed_sub (x : E) : f.normed μ (c - x) = f.normed μ (c + x) := by
simp_rw [f.normed_def, f.sub]
theorem normed_neg (f : ContDiffBump (0 : E)) (x : E) : f.normed μ (-x) = f.normed μ x := by
simp_rw [f.normed_def, f.neg]
variable [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
protected theorem integrable : Integrable f μ :=
f.continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport f.hasCompactSupport
protected theorem integrable_normed : Integrable (f.normed μ) μ :=
f.integrable.div_const _
section
variable [μ.IsOpenPosMeasure]
theorem integral_pos : 0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
refine (integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg f.nonneg' f.integrable).mpr ?_
rw [f.support_eq]
exact measure_ball_pos μ c f.rOut_pos
theorem integral_normed : ∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1 := by
simp_rw [ContDiffBump.normed, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm (f _), ← smul_eq_mul, integral_smul]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ f.integral_pos.ne'
theorem support_normed_eq : Function.support (f.normed μ) = Metric.ball c f.rOut := by
unfold ContDiffBump.normed
rw [support_div, f.support_eq, support_const f.integral_pos.ne', inter_univ]
theorem tsupport_normed_eq : tsupport (f.normed μ) = Metric.closedBall c f.rOut := by
rw [tsupport, f.support_normed_eq, closure_ball _ f.rOut_pos.ne']
theorem hasCompactSupport_normed : HasCompactSupport (f.normed μ) := by
simp only [HasCompactSupport, f.tsupport_normed_eq (μ := μ), isCompact_closedBall]
theorem tendsto_support_normed_smallSets {ι} {φ : ι → ContDiffBump c} {l : Filter ι}
(hφ : Tendsto (fun i => (φ i).rOut) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => Function.support fun x => (φ i).normed μ x) l (𝓝 c).smallSets := by
simp_rw [NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero, Real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_eq_self.mpr (φ _).rOut_pos.le] at hφ
rw [nhds_basis_ball.smallSets.tendsto_right_iff]
refine fun ε hε ↦ (hφ ε hε).mono fun i hi ↦ ?_
rw [(φ i).support_normed_eq]
exact ball_subset_ball hi.le
variable (μ)
theorem integral_normed_smul {X} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace ℝ X]
[CompleteSpace X] (z : X) : ∫ x, f.normed μ x • z ∂μ = z := by
simp_rw [integral_smul_const, f.integral_normed (μ := μ), one_smul]
end
variable (μ)
theorem measure_closedBall_le_integral : μ.real (closedBall c f.rIn) ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by calc
μ.real (closedBall c f.rIn) = ∫ x in closedBall c f.rIn, 1 ∂μ := by simp
_ = ∫ x in closedBall c f.rIn, f x ∂μ := setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_closedBall
(fun x hx ↦ (one_of_mem_closedBall f hx).symm)
_ ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := setIntegral_le_integral f.integrable (Eventually.of_forall (fun x ↦ f.nonneg))
theorem normed_le_div_measure_closedBall_rIn [μ.IsOpenPosMeasure] (x : E) :
f.normed μ x ≤ 1 / μ.real (closedBall c f.rIn) := by
rw [normed_def]
gcongr
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos (measure_closedBall_pos _ _ f.rIn_pos).ne' measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne
· exact f.le_one
· exact f.measure_closedBall_le_integral μ
theorem integral_le_measure_closedBall : ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ μ.real (closedBall c f.rOut) := by calc
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in closedBall c f.rOut, f x ∂μ := by
apply (setIntegral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero (fun x hx ↦ ?_)).symm
apply f.zero_of_le_dist (le_of_lt _)
simpa using hx
| _ ≤ ∫ x in closedBall c f.rOut, 1 ∂μ := by
apply setIntegral_mono f.integrable.integrableOn _ (fun x ↦ f.le_one)
simp [measure_closedBall_lt_top]
_ = μ.real (closedBall c f.rOut) := by simp
theorem measure_closedBall_div_le_integral [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (K : ℝ) (h : f.rOut ≤ K * f.rIn) :
μ.real (closedBall c f.rOut) / K ^ finrank ℝ E ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/BumpFunction/Normed.lean | 117 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Init
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.StacksAttribute
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
/-!
# Categories
Defines a category, as a type class parametrised by the type of objects.
## Notations
Introduces notations in the `CategoryTheory` scope
* `X ⟶ Y` for the morphism spaces (type as `\hom`),
* `𝟙 X` for the identity morphism on `X` (type as `\b1`),
* `f ≫ g` for composition in the 'arrows' convention (type as `\gg`).
Users may like to add `g ⊚ f` for composition in the standard convention, using
```lean
local notation:80 g " ⊚ " f:80 => CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct.comp f g -- type as \oo
```
-/
library_note "CategoryTheory universes"
/--
The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C : Type u`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are independent, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`.
Typically any concrete example will either be a `SmallCategory`, where `v = u`,
which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type u} [SmallCategory C]
```
or a `LargeCategory`, where `u = v+1`, which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type (u+1)} [LargeCategory C]
```
In order for the library to handle these cases uniformly,
we generally work with the unconstrained `Category.{v u}`,
for which objects live in `Type u` and morphisms live in `Type v`.
Because the universe parameter `u` for the objects can be inferred from `C`
when we write `Category C`, while the universe parameter `v` for the morphisms
can not be automatically inferred, through the category theory library
we introduce universe parameters with morphism levels listed first,
as in
```
universe v u
```
or
```
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
```
when multiple independent universes are needed.
This has the effect that we can simply write `Category.{v} C`
(that is, only specifying a single parameter) while `u` will be inferred.
Often, however, it's not even necessary to include the `.{v}`.
(Although it was in earlier versions of Lean.)
If it is omitted a "free" universe will be used.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A preliminary structure on the way to defining a category,
containing the data, but none of the axioms. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
class CategoryStruct (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends Quiver.{v + 1} obj where
/-- The identity morphism on an object. -/
id : ∀ X : obj, Hom X X
/-- Composition of morphisms in a category, written `f ≫ g`. -/
comp : ∀ {X Y Z : obj}, (X ⟶ Y) → (Y ⟶ Z) → (X ⟶ Z)
initialize_simps_projections CategoryStruct (-toQuiver_Hom)
/-- Notation for the identity morphism in a category. -/
scoped notation "𝟙" => CategoryStruct.id -- type as \b1
/-- Notation for composition of morphisms in a category. -/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫ " => CategoryStruct.comp -- type as \gg
/-- Close the main goal with `sorry` if its type contains `sorry`, and fail otherwise. -/
syntax (name := sorryIfSorry) "sorry_if_sorry" : tactic
open Lean Meta Elab.Tactic in
@[tactic sorryIfSorry, inherit_doc sorryIfSorry] def evalSorryIfSorry : Tactic := fun _ => do
let goalType ← getMainTarget
if goalType.hasSorry then
closeMainGoal `sorry_if_sorry (← mkSorry goalType true)
else
throwError "The goal does not contain `sorry`"
/--
`rfl_cat` is a macro for `intros; rfl` which is attempted in `aesop_cat` before
doing the more expensive `aesop` tactic.
This gives a speedup because `simp` (called by `aesop`) is too slow.
There is a fix for this slowness in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7428.
So, when that is resolved, the performance impact of `rfl_cat` should be measured again.
Implementation notes:
* `refine id ?_`:
In some cases it is important that the type of the proof matches the expected type exactly.
e.g. if the goal is `2 = 1 + 1`, the `rfl` tactic will give a proof of type `2 = 2`.
Starting a proof with `refine id ?_` is a trick to make sure that the proof has exactly
the expected type, in this case `2 = 1 + 1`. See also https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/changing.20a.20proof.20can.20break.20a.20later.20proof
* `apply_rfl`:
`rfl` is a macro that attempts both `eq_refl` and `apply_rfl`. Since `apply_rfl`
subsumes `eq_refl`, we can use `apply_rfl` instead. This fails twice as fast as `rfl`.
-/
macro (name := rfl_cat) "rfl_cat" : tactic => do `(tactic| (refine id ?_; intros; apply_rfl))
/--
A thin wrapper for `aesop` which adds the `CategoryTheory` rule set and
allows `aesop` to look through semireducible definitions when calling `intros`.
This tactic fails when it is unable to solve the goal, making it suitable for
use in auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat) "aesop_cat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | rfl_cat |
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
We also use `aesop_cat?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_cat`
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat?) "aesop_cat?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | try_this rfl_cat |
aesop? $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_cat` which does not fail when it is unable to solve the
goal. Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal `aesop` is even worse than
nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat_nonterminal) "aesop_cat_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Subsingleton.elim
/-- The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are unconstrained, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`. (See also `LargeCategory` and `SmallCategory`.) -/
@[pp_with_univ, stacks 0014]
class Category (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends CategoryStruct.{v} obj where
/-- Identity morphisms are left identities for composition. -/
id_comp : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Identity morphisms are right identities for composition. -/
comp_id : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition in a category is associative. -/
assoc : ∀ {W X Y Z : obj} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z), (f ≫ g) ≫ h = f ≫ g ≫ h := by
aesop_cat
attribute [simp] Category.id_comp Category.comp_id Category.assoc
attribute [trans] CategoryStruct.comp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by simp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by simp
/-- A `LargeCategory` has objects in one universe level higher than the universe level of
the morphisms. It is useful for examples such as the category of types, or the category
of groups, etc.
-/
abbrev LargeCategory (C : Type (u + 1)) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
/-- A `SmallCategory` has objects and morphisms in the same universe level.
-/
abbrev SmallCategory (C : Type u) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
section
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
initialize_simps_projections Category (-Hom)
/-- postcompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem eq_whisker {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f = g) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ h = g ≫ h := by rw [w]
/-- precompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem whisker_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) {g h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : g = h) : f ≫ g = f ≫ h := by rw [w]
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the right).
If `f g : X ⟶ Y` and `w : f = g` and `h : Y ⟶ Z`, then `w =≫ h : f ≫ h = g ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " =≫ " => eq_whisker
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the left).
If `g h : Y ⟶ Z` and `w : g = h` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `f ≫= w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h`.
| -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Category/Basic.lean | 213 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
/-!
# The Giry monad
Let X be a measurable space. The collection of all measures on X again
forms a measurable space. This construction forms a monad on
measurable spaces and measurable functions, called the Giry monad.
Note that most sources use the term "Giry monad" for the restriction
to *probability* measures. Here we include all measures on X.
See also `MeasureTheory/Category/MeasCat.lean`, containing an upgrade of the type-level
monad to an honest monad of the functor `measure : MeasCat ⥤ MeasCat`.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Giry+monad>
## Tags
giry monad
-/
noncomputable section
open ENNReal Set Filter
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
/-- Measurability structure on `Measure`: Measures are measurable w.r.t. all projections -/
instance instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace (Measure α) :=
⨆ (s : Set α) (_ : MeasurableSet s), (borel ℝ≥0∞).comap fun μ => μ s
theorem measurable_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun μ : Measure α => μ s :=
Measurable.of_comap_le <| le_iSup_of_le s <| le_iSup_of_le hs <| le_rfl
theorem measurable_of_measurable_coe (f : β → Measure α)
(h : ∀ (s : Set α), MeasurableSet s → Measurable fun b => f b s) : Measurable f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <|
iSup₂_le fun s hs =>
MeasurableSpace.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <| by rw [MeasurableSpace.map_comp]; exact h s hs
instance instMeasurableAdd₂ {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} : MeasurableAdd₂ (Measure α) := by
refine ⟨Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
refine Measurable.add ?_ ?_
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp measurable_fst
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp measurable_snd
theorem measurable_measure {μ : α → Measure β} :
Measurable μ ↔ ∀ (s : Set β), MeasurableSet s → Measurable fun b => μ b s :=
⟨fun hμ _s hs => (measurable_coe hs).comp hμ, measurable_of_measurable_coe μ⟩
theorem _root_.Measurable.measure_of_isPiSystem {μ : α → Measure β} [∀ a, IsFiniteMeasure (μ a)]
{S : Set (Set β)} (hgen : ‹MeasurableSpace β› = .generateFrom S) (hpi : IsPiSystem S)
(h_basic : ∀ s ∈ S, Measurable fun a ↦ μ a s) (h_univ : Measurable fun a ↦ μ a univ) :
Measurable μ := by
rw [measurable_measure]
intro s hs
induction s, hs using MeasurableSpace.induction_on_inter hgen hpi with
| empty => simp
| basic s hs => exact h_basic s hs
| compl s hsm ihs =>
simp only [measure_compl hsm (measure_ne_top _ _)]
exact h_univ.sub ihs
| iUnion f hfd hfm ihf =>
simpa only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm] using .ennreal_tsum ihf
theorem _root_.Measurable.measure_of_isPiSystem_of_isProbabilityMeasure {μ : α → Measure β}
[∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (μ a)]
{S : Set (Set β)} (hgen : ‹MeasurableSpace β› = .generateFrom S) (hpi : IsPiSystem S)
(h_basic : ∀ s ∈ S, Measurable fun a ↦ μ a s) : Measurable μ :=
.measure_of_isPiSystem hgen hpi h_basic <| by simp
@[fun_prop]
theorem measurable_map (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun μ : Measure α => map f μ := by
refine measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [map_apply hf hs]
exact measurable_coe (hf hs)
@[fun_prop]
theorem measurable_dirac : Measurable (Measure.dirac : α → Measure α) := by
refine measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator hs
@[fun_prop]
theorem measurable_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun μ : Measure α => ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral, hf, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
refine .iSup fun n => Finset.measurable_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
refine Measurable.const_mul ?_ _
exact measurable_coe ((SimpleFunc.eapprox f n).measurableSet_preimage _)
/-- Monadic join on `Measure` in the category of measurable spaces and measurable
functions. -/
def join (m : Measure (Measure α)) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => ∫⁻ μ, μ s ∂m)
(by simp only [measure_empty, lintegral_const, zero_mul])
(by
intro f hf h
simp_rw [measure_iUnion h hf]
apply lintegral_tsum
intro i; exact (measurable_coe (hf i)).aemeasurable)
@[simp]
theorem join_apply {m : Measure (Measure α)} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
join m s = ∫⁻ μ, μ s ∂m :=
Measure.ofMeasurable_apply s hs
theorem le_join_apply (m : Measure (Measure α)) (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ μ, μ s ∂m ≤ join m s := by
rw [measure_eq_iInf]
exact le_iInf₂ fun t hst ↦ le_iInf fun htm ↦ join_apply htm ▸ by gcongr
@[simp]
theorem join_smul {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R)
(m : Measure (Measure α)) : (c • m).join = c • m.join := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp]
theorem join_dirac (μ : Measure α) : join (dirac μ) = μ := by
ext s hs
simp [hs, lintegral_dirac', measurable_coe]
theorem le_ae_join (m : Measure (Measure α)) : (ae m).bind ae ≤ ae m.join := by
intro s hs
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
rw [join_apply htm, lintegral_eq_zero_iff (measurable_coe htm)] at ht
rw [mem_bind']
exact ht.mono fun _ ↦ measure_mono_null hst
theorem ae_ae_of_ae_join {m : Measure (Measure α)} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂m.join, p a) :
∀ᵐ μ ∂m, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a :=
le_ae_join m h
theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.ae_of_join {m : Measure (Measure α)} {f : α → β}
(h : AEMeasurable f m.join) : ∀ᵐ μ ∂m, AEMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; (ae_ae_of_ae_join hg).mono fun _μ hμ ↦ ⟨g, hgm, hμ⟩
theorem aemeasurable_lintegral {m : Measure (Measure α)} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : AEMeasurable f m.join) : AEMeasurable (fun μ ↦ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) m :=
let ⟨g, hgm, hfg⟩ := h
⟨fun μ ↦ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ, measurable_lintegral hgm,
| (ae_ae_of_ae_join hfg).mono fun _ ↦ lintegral_congr_ae⟩
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/GiryMonad.lean | 159 | 159 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.